natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Decision No 195/04/COL of the Authority of 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37), as amended by Decision No 319/05/COL of the Authority of 14 December 2005 (OJ C 286, 23.11.2006, p. 9).
Odločba Nadzornega organa št. 195/04/COL z dne 14. julija 2004 (UL L 139, 25.5.2006, str. 37), kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo Nadzornega organa št. 319/05/COL z dne 14. decembra 2005 (UL C 286, 23.11.2006, str. 9).
See also Case T-195/01 Gibraltar v Commission [2001] ECR II-3915.
Glej tudi zadevo T-195/01 Gibraltar proti Komisiji [2001] Recueil, str. II-3915.
It should be noted that since the initial establishment of the scheme was ‘unlawful’ in terms of procedure, all subsequent modifications of that scheme must also be treated as unlawful aid.
Treba je opozoriti, da je treba zato, ker je bila začetna ustanovitev sheme „nezakonita“ v smislu postopka, vse naknadne spremembe te sheme tudi obravnavati kot nezakonito pomoč.
See Decision No 327/99/COL of the Authority of 16 December 1999 on the map of assisted areas and levels of aid (Norway).
Glej Odločbo Nadzornega organa št. 327/99/COL z dne 16. decembra 1999 o zemljevidu območij, ki prejemajo pomoč, in stopnjah pomoči (Norveška).
The previous Chapter 25 of the State Aid Guidelines on regional aid was replaced by new guidelines on 6 April 2006 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 (incorporated by Joint Committee Decision No 157/2006, published in OJ L 89, 29.3.2007, p. 33, and EEA Supplement No 15, 29.3.2007, p. 24).
Prejšnje poglavje 25 Smernic o državni pomoči za regionalno pomoč, kakor so ga nadomestile nove smernice z dne 6. aprila 2006 in Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1628/2006 (vključena s Sklepom Skupnega odbora št. 157/2006, objavljena v UL L 89, 29.3.2007, str. 33, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 15, 29.3.2007, str. 24).
The Regulation entered into force 9 December 2006.
Uredba je začela veljati 9. decembra 2006.
See the (regional aid) ceilings referred to in the table attached to the Internal EEA Guidelines and the explanatory part on investment aid (section 4.6).
Glej zgornje meje (regionalne pomoči), navedene v tabeli, priloženi k internim smernicam EGP in razlagalni del o pomoči za naložbe (oddelek 4.6).
The previous guidelines on research and development were replaced by new guidelines on 7 February 2007.
Prejšnje smernice o raziskavah in razvoju so 7. februarja 2007 nadomestile nove smernice.
The 2000 and 2001 versions appear not to fix a specific aid intensity for technical preparatory studies at all.
Različici za leto 2000 in 2001 sploh ne določata intenzivnosti posebne pomoči za tehnične pripravljalne študije.
Section 5.3(7) of the then Chapter 14 of the State Aid Guidelines on research and development aid.
Oddelek 5.3(7) takratnega poglavja 14 Smernic o državni pomoči za raziskave in razvoj.
See Article 3(3) in the block exemption Regulations on SMEs and on training aid, respectively.
Glej člen 3(3) uredb o skupinskih izjemah za MSP oziroma za pomoč za usposabljanje.
Compliance with the formal conditions of the block exemption exempts the aid measure from the notification requirement.
Na podlagi skladnosti s formalnimi pogoji o skupinskih izjemah je ukrep pomoči oproščen obveznosti priglasitve.
Section 4.4 thereof.
Oddelek 4.4 internih smernic.
Sections 4.3 and 4.3.1 thereof.
Oddelka 4.3 in 4.3.1 internih smernic.
The previous chapter in the State Aid Guidelines on aid for SMEs was superseded by the block exemption Regulation on SMEs as of 26 June 2002.
Prejšnje poglavje v Smernicah o državni pomoči za MSP je s 26. junijem 2002 nadomestila uredba o skupinskih izjemah za MSP.
Such measures include measures similar to performance improvement (kompetansehevning).
Ti ukrepi vključujejo ukrepe, podobne kot za izboljšavo učinkovitosti („kompetansehevning“).
The practice of funding 100 % of project costs raises both an issue of the presence of State aid and one of compatibility.
Pri praksi financiranja 100 % stroškov projekta se zastavlja vprašanje prisotnosti državne pomoči in združljivosti.
Given the reference in the Working Group Report to this possibility, it is assumed that the Scheme envisages such a practice and that the compatibility of the provisions governing that practice must be assessed for compatibility (this section).
Glede na sklicevanje v Poročilu delovne skupine na to možnost se predpostavlja, da shema predvideva tako prakso in da je treba združljivost določb, ki urejajo to prakso, ocenjevati glede združljivosti (ta oddelek).
The issue concerning the presence (or absence) of State aid will be relevant only to the matter of recovery.
Vprašanje prisotnosti (ali odsotnosti) državne pomoči bo relevantno samo v zvezi z izterjavo.
Section 5.3(7) of the then Chapter 14 on research and development aid.
Oddelek 5.3(7) takratnega poglavja 14 o pomoči za raziskave in razvoj.
As stated by the Norwegian authorities it is the date that the Norwegian authorities gave their consent (tilsagn) which determines whether the previous Chapter 12 of the State Aid Guidelines or the subsequent de minimis Regulation is applicable to the grant in question.
Kot so navedli norveški organi, je datum, ko so organi dali odobritev („tilsagn“), tisti, ki določa, ali se za zadevno subvencijo uporablja prejšnje poglavje 12 Smernic o državni pomoči ali naknadna uredba de minimis.
See in this regard the reference to ‘control modality’ in the State Aid Guidelines.
Glej v tem smislu sklicevanje na „način nadzora“ v Smernicah o državni pomoči.
The fact that many consents may be below the de minimis threshold is not relevant since the Authority is, for purposes of analysing whether State aid is compatible, limited to considering the terms of the Wood Scheme.
Dejstvo, da so bila številna soglasja dana za pomoč pod pragom de minimis, ni pomembno, saj je Nadzorni organ pri analizi, ali je državna pomoč združljiva, omejen z upoštevanjem pogojev Lesne sheme.
The factual situation will be relevant for the question of recovery.
Dejansko stanje bo pomembno za vprašanje izterjave.
See section I-2.5 above for a description of the practice.
Glej oddelek I-2.5 zgoraj za opis prakse.
Commission Decision 2003/643/EC of 13 May 2003 on the State aid implemented by Germany for Kahla Porzellan GmbH and Kahla/Thüringen Porzellan GmbH (OJ L 227, 11.9.2003, p. 12).
Odločba Komisije 2003/643/ES z dne 13. maja 2003 o Državni pomoči, ki jo izvaja Nemčija v korist Kahla Porzellan GmbH in Kahla/Thüringen Porzellan GmbH (UL L 227, 11.9.2003, str. 12).
In a similar vein, when assessing whether the relevant aid intensities set out in the State Aid Guidelines have been complied with, the total amount of aid granted to the same undertaking must be taken into account.
Podobno je treba pri ocenjevanju, ali je bila upoštevana ustrezna intenzivnost pomoči, določena v Smernicah o državni pomoči, upoštevati skupni znesek pomoči, dodeljene istemu podjetju.
It should be noted that the relevant aid intensities must also be respected.
Treba je opozoriti, da mora biti upoštevana tudi ustrezna intenzivnost pomoči.
Where de minimis aid is granted in combination with other aid, the total amount of aid may not exceed the maximum aid intensities for the various categories of aid.
Če se pomoč de minimis dodeli v kombinaciji z drugimi vrstami pomoči, skupni znesek pomoči ne sme presegati največje intenzivnosti pomoči za različne kategorije.
This is, of course, only relevant where total aid does not qualify as de minimis aid.
To je seveda pomembno samo, če se ustrezna skupna pomoč ne šteje kot pomoč de minimis.
See, for example, Commission Decision 2004/343/EC of 16 December 2003 on the aid scheme implemented by France for the takeover of firms in difficulty (OJ L 108, 16.4.2004, p. 38), and Commission Decision 2003/86/EC of 20 December 2001 on a State aid scheme implemented by Spain in 1993 for certain newly established firms in Vizcaya (Spain) (OJ L 40, 14.2.2003, p. 11).
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije 2004/343/ES z dne 16. decembra 2003 o shemi pomoči, ki jo izvaja Francija za prevzem podjetij v težavah (UL L 108, 16.4.2004, str. 38), in Odločbo Komisije 2003/86/ES z dne 20. decembra 2001 o shemi državne pomoči, ki jo je izvajala Španija leta 1993 za nekatera novoustanovljena podjetja v Vizcayi (Španija) (UL L 40, 14.2.2003, str. 11).
See footnote 49.
Glej opombo 49.
ELIGIBLE COSTS SET OUT IN THE INTERNAL EEA GUIDELINES
UPRAVIČENI STROŠKI, DOLOČENI V INTERNIH SMERNICAH EGP
With respect to aid for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [1] eligible costs are (i) consultancy services provided by outside consultants (excluding those of a continuous or periodic character and those relating to usual operating expenditure); (ii) participation, for the first time, in fairs and exhibitions; and (iii) networking and cooperation in both the establishment and start-up phase.
Kar zadeva pomoč za mala in srednje velika podjetja (MSP) [1], med upravičene stroške spadajo (i) svetovalne storitve zunanjih svetovalcev (razen stalnih ali periodičnih storitev in tistih, ki so povezane z običajnimi operativnimi stroški); (ii) prva udeležba na sejmih in razstavah ter (iii) mreženje in sodelovanje v fazi ustanavljanja in zagona.
The establishment phase covers funding for identifying work partners, developing strategies, structuring and formalising the cooperation etc. The start-up phase covers administration costs for administering the cooperation during the first 3 years (progressively decreasing) and ‘extraordinary joint actions’.
Faza ustanovitve vključuje financiranje za iskanje poslovnih partnerjev, razvoj strategij, strukturiranje in formalizacijo sodelovanja itd. Zagonska faza zajema administrativne stroške za upravljanje sodelovanja v prvih treh letih (progresivno padajoče) in „izredne skupne ukrepe“.
An example of the latter is ‘competence improvement’ but funding under the heading of ‘extraordinary joint actions’ may also be granted to other similar measures during both the establishment phase and later on during the operational phase.
Primer slednjega je „izboljšanje kompetenc“, vendar se sredstva iz postavke „izredni skupni ukrepi“ lahko dodelijo tudi za druge podobne ukrepe ne samo v fazi ustanavljanja, ampak tudi pozneje med samim delovanjem.
For the purposes of granting aid for training a distinction is drawn between specific training and general training.
Za namene dodeljevanja pomoči za usposabljanje je treba ločevati med posebnim in splošnim usposabljanjem.
The latter covers tuition directly and principally applicable to the employee’s present or future position and providing qualifications which are not (or only to a limited extent) transferable to other firms or fields of work.
Posebno usposabljanje pomeni usposabljanje, ki ga delojemalec neposredno in v pretežni meri uporablja na trenutnem ali prihodnjem delovnem mestu delojemalca in ki mu daje znanja, ki niso (ali pa so zgolj v omejenem obsegu) prenosljiva na druga podjetja ali delovna področja.
General training is training involving tuition, not applicable only to the employee’s present or future position, but providing qualifications that are largely transferable to other entities and substantially improve employability of the employee.
Splošno usposabljanje je usposabljanje, vključno s šolnino, ki se ne uporablja samo za trenutno ali prihodnje delovno mesto delojemalca, ampak zagotavlja usposobljenost, ki se lahko prenaša na druge subjekte in bistveno izboljša zaposljivost delojemalca.
Eligible costs for training are trainers’ personnel costs; trainers’ and trainees’ travel expenses; other current expenses (such as materials and supplies); depreciation of tools and equipment (to the extent that they are used exclusively for the training project); cost of guidance and counselling services with regard to the training project; trainees’ personnel costs up to the amount of the total of the other eligible costs referred to.
Upravičeni stroški za usposabljanje so stroški vodje usposabljanja za osebje; potni stroški izvajalcev in udeležencev usposabljanja; drugi tekoči stroški (kot so material in zaloge); amortizacija orodja in opreme v obsegu, v katerem se uporabljajo izključno za projekt usposabljanja; stroški vodenja in svetovanja, ki se nanašajo na projekt usposabljanja; stroški oseb, ki se usposabljajo, do skupnega zneska vseh drugih navedenih upravičenih stroškov.
Only the hours during which the trainees actually participate in the training after deduction of any productive hours or of their equivalent may be taken into account.
Upoštevajo se lahko samo ure, ko so osebe, ki se usposabljajo, dejansko sodelovale pri usposabljanju, po odbitku produktivnih ur ali njihovega ekvivalenta.
The eligible costs shall be supported by documentary evidence which shall be transparent and itemised.
Upravičene stroške je treba podpreti z dokumentarnimi dokazili, ki morajo biti pregledna in razčlenjena.
As regards research and development the Internal EEA Guidelines provide that eligible costs are personnel costs (researchers, technicians and assistance personnel, exclusively used for the research and development activity), instruments, equipment, working space and buildings (permanently and exclusively used for the research and development activity); consultancy assistance and corresponding services (exclusively used in the context of the research and development activity) and administration directly related to the research and development activity.
Interne smernice EGP glede raziskav in razvoja določajo, da upravičeni stroški vključujejo stroške osebja (raziskovalci, tehniki in pomožno osebje, ki so izključno vključeni v raziskovalno in razvojno dejavnost), instrumente, opremo, delovni prostor in stavbe (ki se stalno in izključno uporabljajo za raziskovalno in razvojno dejavnost); svetovalno pomoč in ustrezne storitve (ki se izključno uporabljajo v okviru raziskovalne in razvojne dejavnosti) in administracijo, neposredno povezano z raziskovalno in razvojno dejavnostjo.
Other eligible costs could be operating expenses such as materials, supplies and similar products which are directly related to the research and development activity.
Drugi upravičeni stroški so lahko stroški poslovanja, kot so materiali, zaloge in podobni proizvodi, ki so neposredno povezani z raziskovalno in razvojno dejavnostjo.
With respect to ‘investments’ (by SMEs and in the context of regional aid) eligible costs are buildings, plants, machines, fundamental investments as well as expenses in relation to patents and the acquisition of patents, licenses and technical knowledge.
Kar zadeva „naložbe“ (MSP in v kontekstu regionalne pomoči), so upravičeni stroški stavbe, objekti, stroji, osnovne naložbe, pa tudi stroški v zvezi s patenti in pridobivanjem patentov, licenc in tehničnega znanja.
Special rules apply to projects in which investment costs exceed EUR 50 million.
Posebna pravila se uporabljajo za projekte, pri katerih naložbeni stroški presegajo 50 milijonov EUR.
Operating aid (defined as routine tasks or expenses for distribution, marketing and accounting) cannot be granted.
Pomoči za operativne stroške (opredeljene kot rutinske naloge ali stroške za distribucijo, trženje in računovodstvo) ni možno dodeliti.
Only the main terms of the definition of SME’s are stated in the Internal EEA Guidelines.
V internih smernicah EGP so navedeni samo glavni pogoji opredelitve MSP.
Reference is otherwise made to the original definition in the State Aid Guidelines.
Sklicevanje se sicer nanaša na prvotno opredelitev v Smernicah o državni pomoči.
MAXIMUM FUNDING RATES FOR VARIOUS SCHEMES ADMINISTERED BY INNOVASJON NORGE — SIZE OF UNDERTAKINGS AND AREAS ELIGIBLE FOR AID
NAJVEČJI OBSEG FINANCIRANJA ZA RAZLIČNE SHEME, KI JIH UPRAVLJA INNOVASJON NORGE – VELIKOST PODJETJA IN OBMOČJA, UPRAVIČENA DO POMOČI
indicates that the scheme is only exceptionally relevant for the stated purposes and/or type of undertakings.
pomeni, da je shema samo izjemoma primerna za navedeni namen in/ali vrsto podjetja.
Up to EUR 100000 may be granted under all schemes on the basis of the rules on de minimis aid.
Do 100000 EUR se lahko dodeli v okviru vseh shem na podlagi pravil o pomoči de minimis.
Measure — Scheme
Ukrep – Shema pomoči
SMEs (< 250 employees and two other criteria)
MSP (< 250 zaposlenih in dve drugi merili)
Large undertakings
Velika podjetja
(< 50 employees and two other criteria)
(< 50 zaposlenih in dve drugi merili)
Medium-sized enterprises
Srednje velika podjetja
(< 250 employees and two other criteria)
(< 250 zaposlenih in dve drugi merili)
aid
0Pomoč za usposabljanje
aid (shall not be given from LI for the moment)
0Pomoč za usposabljanje (trenutno ne bo dana iz LI)
(Specific/general — 35 %/70 %)
(Posebna/splošna — 35 %/70 %)
(Specific/general — 25 %/50 %)
(Posebna/splošna — 25 %/50 %)
R&D:
RAZISKAVE IN RAZVOJ:
Development activities for commercialisation
Razvojne dejavnosti za komercializacijo
Technical preparatory studies
Strokovne pripravljalne študije
(Individual Research, Technical preparatory studies)
(Posamezne raziskave, strokovne pripravljalne študije)
35 % (regional area + 5 %)
35 % (regionalno območje + 5 %)
25 % (regional area + 5 %)
25 % (regionalno območje + 5 %)
(Individual research, Technical preparatory studies)
(Posamezne raziskave, strokovne pripravljalne študije)
Investments:
Naložbe:
Soft aid
Blaga pomoč
Specific/general — 40 %/75 %
Posebna/splošna — 40 %/75 %
Specific/general — 30 %/55 %
Posebna/splošna — 30 %/55 %
Outside reg. area
Zunaj reg. območja
0— Within reg. area
0— V reg. območju
Zone A: 30 %, B: 25 % and C: 20 % (25 %) [2]
Območje A: 30 %, B: 25 % in C: 20 % (25 %) [2]
Zone A: 25 %, B: 20 % and C: 10 % (15 %)
Območje A: 25 %, B: 20 % and C: 10 % (15 %)
Soft aid:
Blaga pomoč:
Within reg. area
V reg. območju
Training aid:
Pomoč za usposabljanje:
Specific/general — 35 %/70 %
Posebna/splošna — 35 %/70 %
Specific/general — 25 %/50 %
Posebna/splošna — 25 %/50 %
Outside reg. area:
Zunaj reg. območja:
Within reg. area:
V reg. območju:
‘Etablererstipend’
„Etabelarerstipend“
Max. NOK 400000 (in spec. cases more but not over EUR 100000)
Največ 400000 NOK (v posebnih primerih več, vendar ne več kot 100000 EUR)
Up to 25 %/15 % may be used for measures which can be expected to have a strong effect from a district policy point of view.
Do 25 %/15 % se lahko uporabi za ukrepe, za katere je z vidika okrožne politike pričakovati, da bodo imeli močan učinek.
In the counties of Vest-Agder, Rogaland and Hordaland the aid threshold may not be in excess of 20 %/10 %.
V okrajih Vest-Agder, Rogaland in Hordaland prag pomoči ne sme presegati 20 %/10 %.
Up to 25 %/15 % may be used for measures which can be expected to have a strong regional effect.
Do 25 %/15 % se lahko uporabi za ukrepe, za katere je pričakovati, da bodo imeli močan regionalni učinek.
In the counties of Vest-Agder, Rogaland and Hordaland the thresholds may not be in excess of 20 %/10 %.
V okrajih Vest-Agder, Rogaland in Hordaland prag ne sme presegati 20 %/10 %.
While the Internal EEA Guidelines specify aid intensities for SMEs [33], aid intensities for other types of aid are indicated only by reference to a table, entitled ‘Maximum funding rates for schemes administered by Innovasjon Norge — size of undertaking and areas eligible for aid’.
Čeprav interne smernice EGP določajo intenzivnost pomoči za MSP [33], je intenzivnost pomoči za druge vrste pomoči navedena samo s sklicevanjem na tabelo z naslovom „Največji obseg financiranja za sheme, ki jih upravlja Innovasjon Norge – velikost podjetja in območja, upravičena do pomoči“.
In this regard it is specifically stated in Section 4.3 of the White Paper that ‘Norway exports approximately 85-90 % of the wholesale production of wood and paper products and approximately 35 % of the timber production. Supplies to EU countries amount to 70 % and 90 % respectively of total exports. Any strategies or political interventions within the EU which can affect the EU’s import of forest industry products could have significant consequences for the Norwegian forest sector’ [40].
V zvezi s tem je v oddelku 4.3 Bele knjige posebej navedeno, da „Norveška izvozi približno 85 do 90 % proizvodnje lesnih in papirnih izdelkov za veleprodajo ter približno 35 % proizvodnje gradbenega lesa. Dobave v države EU znašajo 70 % in 90 % celotnega izvoza. Kakršne koli strategije ali politična posredovanja v EU, ki lahko vplivajo na uvoz izdelkov gozdarske industrije v EU, bi lahko imeli velike posledice za norveški gozdarski sektor“ [40].
The obligation to submit information on aid received 3 years counted from the time of the letter of consent must be read in context with the text regarding the obligation not to receive aid over ‘any’ period of 3 years.
Obveznost pošiljanja informacij o prejeti pomoči v obdobju treh let od dopisa o odobritvi je treba brati v sobesedilu v zvezi z obveznostjo, da se pomoč ne prejme v „katerem koli“ obdobju treh let.
According to the authorities this ensures compliance with the de minimis Regulation.
Po mnenju organov to zagotavlja združljivost z uredbo de minimis.
The table, which does not include a reference to the Wood Scheme, is reproduced in a translated version in Annex II hereto.
Tabela, ki ne vsebuje sklicevanja na Lesno shemo, je navedena v prevedeni različici Priloge II spodaj.
The authorities have subsequently explained that the reference to a lack of compliance with ‘procedural rules’ means that in 10 cases aid was awarded up to the permitted aid intensity but topped up with de minimis aid without informing the recipient of the de minimis element of the aid.
Organi so naknadno razložili, da sklicevanje na premajhno skladnost z „vsebinskimi pravili“ pomeni, da je bila v desetih zadevah pomoč dodeljena do dovoljene meje intenzivnosti, ki pa ji je bila dodana pomoč de minimis, ne da bi prejemnik poslal obvestilo o elementu pomoči de minimis.
In Case C-66/02 Italy v Commission [2005] ECR p. I-10901, paragraph 91, the Court stated ‘In the case of an aid scheme, the Commission may confine itself to examining the general characteristics of the scheme in question without being required to examine each particular case in which it applies […] in order to establish whether the scheme involves elements of aid.’. See also Case E-2/05 ESA v Iceland [2005] EFTA Court Report p. 202, paragraph 24.
V zadevi C-66/02 Italija proti Komisiji [2005] ZOdl., str. I-10901, odstavek 91, se je sodišče izreklo takole: „V primeru sheme pomoči se Komisija lahko omeji na preiskovanje splošnih značilnosti zadevne sheme, ne da bi ji bilo treba preiskati vsak posamezen primer, v katerem se shema uporablja […], da bi ugotovila, če shema vsebuje elemente pomoči.“ Glej tudi zadevo E-2/05 ESA proti Islandiji [2005] Poročilo sodišča EFTA, str. 202, odstavek 24.
Moreover, it appears from Eurostat statistics that wood products are extensively traded in the EU [41].
Poleg tega iz Eurostatove statistike izhaja, da se v EU veliko trguje z lesnimi izdelki [41].
In this regard the Authority recalls that in Case C-310/99, the European Court of Justice stated that: ‘There was no need for the contested decision to include an analysis of the aid granted in individual cases on the basis of the scheme. It is only at the stage of recovery of the aid that it is necessary to look at the individual situation of each undertaking concerned.’ [48]. In line with that case law, the Authority has assessed the Wood Scheme on the basis of the characteristics of the scheme (as opposed to the specifics of the individual awards under the scheme).
V tem smislu Nadzorni organ opozarja, da je v zadevi C-310/99 Evropsko sodišče izjavilo, da: „Ni bilo potrebe, da bi spodbijana odločitev vsebovala analizo pomoči, dane v posameznih primerih na podlagi sheme. Šele v fazi izterjave pomoči je treba pregledati posamezno stanje vsakega zadevnega podjetja.“ [48] V skladu s to sodno prakso je Nadzorni organ ocenil Lesno shemo na podlagi značilnosti sheme (v nasprotju z značilnostmi posameznih dodelitev subvencij v okviru sheme).
The Norwegian authorities stated that the results (of the project) are accessible for its member companies, and that, in any event, much of Norsk Treteknisk Institutt’s information is generally accessible via its library.2.5. De minimis aid
Norveški organi so navedli, da so rezultati (projekta) na voljo podjetjem, ki so njegovi člani, in da je v vsakem primeru mnogo informacij Norsk Treteknisk Institutta na splošno dostopnih prek njegove knjižnice.2.5 Pomoč de minimis