natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is a principle recently re-affirmed by the Court of Justice as follows: ‘In a situation such as that in the main proceedings, the existence of an exceptional circumstance also cannot be upheld in the light of the principle of legal certainty, since the Court has already held, essentially, that, so long as the Commission has not taken a decision approving aid, …the recipient cannot be certain as to the lawfulness of the aid, with the result that neither the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations nor that of legal certainty can be relied upon’ [45].
To načelo je nedavno vnovič potrdilo Sodišče: „V položaju, kakršen je ta v postopku v glavni stvari, obstoj izjemne okoliščine prav tako ne more biti sprejet glede na načelo pravne varnosti, saj je Sodišče v bistvu že odločilo, da če Komisija dolgo časa ne sprejme odločbe o odobritvi pomoči, [..] prejemnik ne more biti prepričan o zakonitosti pomoči“ [45].
In principle, the case-law of the Court of Justice has stated that a legitimate expectation that aid is lawful cannot be invoked unless that aid has been granted in compliance with the procedure laid down in Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 [46], remarking that a diligent business man should normally be able to determine whether that procedure has been followed [47].Notwithstanding this, the Court has also accepted that in exceptional circumstances a recipient of aid which is granted unlawfully because it was not notified may rely on legitimate expectations that the aid was lawful in order to oppose its repayment [48].
S sodno prakso Sodišča je načelno določeno, da se ni mogoče sklicevati na legitimno pričakovanje, da je pomoč zakonita, razen če je bila pomoč dodeljena v skladu s postopkom iz člena 1(3) dela I Protokola 3 [46], pri čemer je dodano, da bi vesten poslovnež običajno moral biti sposoben ugotoviti, ali je bil ta postopek upoštevan [47].Ne glede na to se je Sodišče strinjalo tudi, da se v izjemnih okoliščinah prejemnik pomoči, ki je bila dodeljena nezakonito, ker ni bila priglašena, pri nasprotovanju njenemu vračilu lahko sklicuje na legitimna pričakovanja, da je bila pomoč zakonita [48].
The Court of Justice has held that an entity may rely on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations where a Community authority has caused it to entertain expectations which are justified [49].
Sodišče je razsodilo, da se subjekt lahko sklicuje na načelo zaščite legitimnih pričakovanj, kadar je zaradi organa Skupnosti ustvaril pričakovanja, ki so utemeljena [49].
This means in this context that a State or beneficiary must have relied on the previous actions of the Authority (or the European Commission) in, for example, approving the same or a similar aid measure.
To v tem okviru pomeni, da se je država ali upravičenec moral zanašati na predhodne ukrepe Nadzornega organa (ali Evropske komisije), na primer pri odobritvi enakega ali podobnega ukrepa pomoči.
Neither the Authority nor the Commission has taken such action, and indeed the decisions of the Authority in disallowing fiscal aid measures in Finland and Norway shortly before the implementation of the Liechtenstein Tax Act should have made it clear that tax measures favouring certain companies or groups of companies should be notified to the Authority [50].Finally, the Authority does not accept that any arguments relating to legal certainty can be valid in this case given the jurisprudence of the court and the wide ranging applicability of Articles 61 (of the EEA Agreement) and 107 (TFEU).
Niti Nadzorni organ niti Komisija nista sprejela nobenega takšnega ukrepa, odločitve Nadzornega organa o zavrnitvi ukrepov fiskalne pomoči na Finskem in Norveškem malo pred uvedbo lihtenštajnskega zakona o davku pa bi morale jasno pokazati, da morajo biti davčni ukrepi, ki dajejo prednost posameznim družbam ali skupinam družb, priglašeni Nadzornemu organu [50].Nadzorni organ se prav tako ne more strinjati, da bi lahko bila glede na sodno prakso Sodišča in široko uporabo členov 61 (Sporazuma EGP) in 107 (PDEU) v tem primeru tehtna katera koli od utemeljitev v zvezi s pravno varnostjo.
The Authority does not accept therefore that this Decision breaches fundamental principles of EEA law.
Nadzorni organ se tako ne strinja s trditvijo, da ta odločba krši temeljna načela prava EGP.
Case C-8/03, Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA (BBL) v Belgian State [2004] ECR.
Zadeva C-8/03, Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA (BBL) proti državi Belgiji, Zodl.
I-10157, paragraphs 42 and 43.
2004, str. I-10157, točki 42 in 43.
Case C-1/09 Centre d'Exportation du Livre Français (CELF), Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication v Société Internationale de Diffusion et d'Édition, judgment of 11.3.2010.
Sodba z dne 11. marca 2010 v zadevi C-1/09, Centre d’Exportation du Livre Français (CELF) in Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication proti Société Internationale de Diffusion et d’Édition.
See also Case C-91/01 Italy v Commission [2004] ECR I-4355, paragraphs 66 and 67.
Glej tudi zadevo C-91/01, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2004, str. I-4355, točki 66 in 67.
See Government Bill No 69/1995, p. 10, in which it was stated that the repeal of the coupon tax on ‘their’ distributions was a pre-condition for the foundation of investment undertakings. Regarding the entry into force, see Gesetz vom3.5.1996über die Abänderung des Steuergesetzes, LGBl.
Glej osnutek zakona št. 69/1995, str. 10, v katerem je bilo navedeno, da je ukinitev davka na obresti od kuponskih obveznic na „njihova“ izplačila predpogoj za ustanovitev investicijskih družb.
Pursuant to Article 1(3) of Part I of Protocol 3, ‘the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall be informed, in sufficient time to enable it to submit its comments, of any plans to grant or alter aid (…). The State concerned shall not put its proposed measures into effect until the procedure has resulted in a final decision’. The Liechtenstein authorities did not notify the aid measures to the Authority.
V skladu s členom 1(3) dela I Protokola 3 „mora biti Nadzorni organ Efte o vseh načrtih za dodelitev ali spremembo pomoči obveščen dovolj zgodaj, da lahko predloži pripombe […]. Zadevna država ne sme izvajati svojih predlaganih ukrepov, dokler v tem postopku ni sprejeta dokončna odločitev.“ Lihtenštajnski organi ukrepa pomoči niso priglasili Nadzornemu organu.
No 1/2010/SC
št. 1/2010/SO
establishing an EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee 2009-2014
o ustanovitvi Začasnega odbora za finančni mehanizem EGP za obdobje 2009–2014
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adjusted by the Protocol Adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, kakor je bil prilagojen s Protokolom o prilagoditvi Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP),
Having regard to the agreement to be concluded establishing a new EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014,
ob upoštevanju sporazuma o novem finančnem mehanizmu EGP, ki bo sklenjen za obdobje 2009–2014,
Considering the agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Community to establish a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014,
ob upoštevanju sporazuma med Kraljevino Norveško in Evropsko skupnostjo o norveškem finančnem mehanizmu za obdobje 2009–2014 –
An EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee 2009-2014, hereinafter referred to as the Interim Committee, which should be operative as soon as possible, is hereby established.
Ustanovi se začasni odbor za finančni mehanizem EGP za obdobje 2009–2014 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Začasni odbor), ki mora postati čim prej operativen.
The Interim Committee shall assist the EFTA States in preparing for the implementation of the EEA Financial Mechanism for 2009-2014.
Začasni odbor pomaga državam Efte pri pripravah na izvajanje finančnega mehanizma EGP za obdobje 2009–2014.
The Interim Committee shall report to the Standing Committee.
Začasni odbor poroča Stalnemu odboru.
The Interim Committee may be assisted by the Missions of the EEA EFTA States to the EU.
Začasnemu odboru lahko pomagajo misije držav Efte, ki so članice EGP, pri EU.
The Interim Committee shall on the day of entering into force or on the day of provisional application of the legal act establishing the EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014 be replaced by an EEA Financial Mechanism Committee 2009-2014.
Odbor za finančni mehanizem EGP za obdobje 2009–2014 nadomesti Začasni odbor na dan začetka veljavnosti ali začasne uporabe pravnega akta o finančnem mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014.
The Interim Committee shall discuss and assess possible coordination between the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism.
Začasni odbor razpravlja in oceni možno uskladitev med finančnim mehanizmom EGP in norveškim finančnim mehanizmom.
The Interim Committee shall agree upon a Chairman who shall be confirmed by the Standing Committee.
Začasni odbor imenuje predsednika, ki ga potrdi Stalni odbor.
Prinz Nikolaus von Liechtenstein
Njegova presvetla visokost Princ Nikolaus von Lihtenštajn
No 3/2010/SC
št. 3/2010/SC
on internal cost sharing
glede notranje delitve stroškov
The contributions of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (hereinafter referred to as the EFTA States) to the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014 are to be divided into five annual tranches and determined on the basis of Article 2.
Prispevki Islandije, Lihtenštajna in Norveške (v nadaljnjem besedilu: države Efte) k finančnemu mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014 se razdelijo na pet letnih obrokov in se določijo na podlagi člena 2.
The contributions of the EFTA States to the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014 are based on their Gross Domestic Products (GDP).
Prispevki držav Efte k finančnemu mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014 so določeni na podlagi bruto domačega proizvoda (BDP).
For any EFTA State, the contribution for a specific financial year t is to be based on the available GDP data for the year t-2 and corresponds to that States’ share of GDP (t-2) in the overall GDP (t-2) of the EFTA States.
Za vsako državo Efte se prispevki za določeno proračunsko leto t določijo na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov o BDP-ju za leto t–2 in ti prispevki ustrezajo deležu državnega BDP-ja (t–2) v celotnem BDP-ju (t–2) držav Efte.
For Iceland, the contribution to each of the five annual tranches may not exceed the amount of EUR 6,795 million.
Za Islandijo prispevki za vsakega od petih letnih obrokov ne smejo presegati 6,795 milijona EUR.
If Iceland’s contribution for a specific financial year t, calculated on Iceland’s share of GDP (t-2) in the overall GDP (t-2) of the EFTA States, should exceed the amount of EUR 6,795 million, Liechtenstein and Norway shall be obliged to cover the excessive sum in proportion to their respective shares of GDP (t-2).
Če prispevki Islandije za določeno leto t, ki so bili izračunani na podlagi islandskega deleža BDP-ja (t–2) v celotnem BDP-ju (t–2) držav Efte, presegajo znesek 6,795 milijona EUR, morata Lihtenštajn in Norveška pokriti presežek v sorazmerju z njunima deležema BDP-ja (t–2).
The respective GDP data on which the contributions for a specific year t are to be based shall be delivered annually by each EFTA States by 1 March.
Zadevne podatke o BDP-ju, na podlagi katerih se izračunajo prispevki za določeno leto t, posreduje vsaka država Efte za posamezno leto do 1. marca.
They shall relate to the year t-2.
Navedeni podatki se nanašajo na leto t–2.
Contributions shall be expressed in euros.
Prispevki so izraženi v eurih.
The accession of an EFTA State to the EU shall not affect its obligation to contribute to the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014 in accordance with this Decision.
Pristop države Efte k EU ne vpliva na njeno obveznost, da prispeva k finančnemu mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014 v skladu s tem sklepom.
This Decision shall take effect on the day of entering into force or on the day of provisional application of the legal act establishing the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014.
Ta sklep začne veljati na dan začetka veljavnosti ali začasne uporabe pravnega akta o finančnem mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014.
The Standing Committee agrees that, before finalising possible negotiations regarding post 2014 financial contributions to reduce the economic and social disparities in the EEA, a review of the cost sharing mechanism in view of a change from GDP to GNI as the basis for the calculation shall take place.
Stalni odbor se strinja, da se pred zaključkom možnih pogajanj glede finančnih prispevkov, ki bi jih prispevali po letu 2014 za zmanjšanje gospodarskih in socialnih razlik v EGP, izvede pregled mehanizma delitve stroškov zaradi prehoda z BDP na BND kot osnovo za izračun.
No 5/2010/SC
št. 5/2010/SC
amending Decision of the Standing Committee No 4/2004/SC establishing a Financial Mechanism Committee
o spremembi Sklepa Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 4/2004/SC o ustanovitvi odbora za finančni mehanizem
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area as adjusted by the Protocol Adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, kakor je bil prilagojen s Protokolom o prilagoditvi Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP),
Having regard to the Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Islandijo, Kneževino Lihtenštajn in Kraljevino Norveško o finančnem mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014,
Having regard to Protocol 38b on the EEA Financial Mechanism inserted into the EEA Agreement by the aforementioned Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014,
ob upoštevanju Protokola 38b o finančnem mehanizmu EGP, ki je bil vključen v Sporazum EGP z zgoraj navedenim sporazumom med Evropsko unijo, Islandijo, Kneževino Lihtenštajn in Kraljevino Norveško o finančnem mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014,
Having regard to the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med Kraljevino Norveško in Evropsko unijo o norveškem finančnem mehanizmu za obdobje 2009–2014,
Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 4/2004/SC of 3 June 2004 establishing a Financial Mechanism Committee [1],
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 4/2004/SC z dne 3. junija 2004 o ustanovitvi odbora za finančni mehanizem [1],
Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 1/2010/SC of 28 January 2010 establishing an EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee 2009-2014 [2],
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 1/2010/SO z dne 28. januarja 2010 o ustanovitvi Začasnega odbora za finančni mehanizem EGP 2009–2014 [2] –
In Article 1 of Decision No 4/2004/SC the second sentence of paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following wording:
Drugi stavek prvega odstavka člena 1 Sklepa št. 4/2004/SC se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘The Committee shall manage the EEA Financial Mechanism 2004-2009 and the EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014.’
„Odbor bo upravljal s finančnim mehanizmom EGP za obdobje 2004–2009 in finančnim mehanizmom EGP za obdobje 2009–2014“.
This Decision shall take effect on the day of entering into force or on the day of provisional application of the legal act establishing the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014.
Ta Sklep začne veljati na dan začetka veljavnosti ali začasne uporabe pravnega akta o finančnem mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014.
OJ L 52, 23.2.2006, p. 54.
UL L 52, 23.2.2006, str. 54.
OJ L 53, 4.3.2010, p. 19.
UL L 53, 4.3.2010, str. 19.
No 6/2010/SC
št. 6/2010/SC
extending the tasks of the Office for the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism
o razširitvi nalog Urada za finančni mehanizem EGP in norveški finančni mehanizem
Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 1/2004/SC of 5 February 2004 establishing an Office for the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 1/2004/SC z dne 5. februarja 2004 o ustanovitvi Urada za finančni mehanizem EGP in norveški finančni mehanizem,
Having regard to Protocol 38b on the EEA Financial Mechanism, inserted into the EEA Agreement by the aforementioned Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014,
ob upoštevanju Protokola 38b o finančnem mehanizmu EGP, ki je bil vključen v Sporazum EGP z zgoraj navedenim sporazumom med Evropsko unijo, Islandijo, Kneževino Lihtenštajn in Kraljevino Norveško o finančnem mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014,
Recalling that Article 1, paragraph 1 of the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 1/2004/SC only gives the Office for the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism a mandate to administer the 2004-2009 Financial Mechanisms,
ob upoštevanju, da prvi odstavek člena 1 Sklepa Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 1/2004/SC pooblašča le Urad za finančni mehanizem EGP in norveški finančni mehanizem za upravljanje finančnih mehanizmov za obdobje 2004–2009,
The Office for the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism, established by Standing Committee Decision No 1/2004/SC, is hereby additionally entrusted with the task of serving as a secretariat assisting in the management of the EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014 and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009-2014.
Urad za finančni mehanizem EGP in norveški finančni mehanizem, ki je bil ustanovljen s Sklepom Stalnega odbora držav Efte 1/2004/SC, je dodatno odgovoren za opravljanje nalog sekretariata pri upravljanju finančnega mehanizma EGP za obdobje 2009–2014 in norveškega finančnega mehanizma za obdobje 2009–2014.
Regarding the EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014, the Office shall report to the EEA Financial Mechanism Committee.
O finančnem mehanizmu EGP za obdobje 2009–2014 Urad poroča odboru za finančni mehanizem EGP.
Regarding the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009-2014, the Office shall report to the Norwegian Ministry for Foreign Affairs.
O norveškem finančnem mehanizmu za obdobju 2009–2014 pa Urad poroča norveškemu Ministrstvu za zunanje zadeve.
Considering the need for a Secretariat to administer the EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms 2009-2014,
ob upoštevanju, da je potreben sekretariat za vodenje finančnega mehanizma EGP in norveškega finančnega mehanizma za obdobje 2009–2014 –
No 8/11/COL
št. 8/11/COL
amending the list contained in point 39 of Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement on the European Economic Area listing border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway agreed for veterinary checks on live animals and animal products from third countries and repealing EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 43/10/COL of 10 February 2010
o spremembi seznama iz točke 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, ki navaja mejne kontrolne točke na Islandiji in na Norveškem, dogovorjene za veterinarske preglede živih živali ter živalskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav, ter o razveljavitvi Odločbe Nadzornega organa Efte št. 43/10/COL z dne 10. februarja 2010
Having regard to points 4(B)(1) and (3) and point 5(b) of the Introductory Part of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement,
ob upoštevanju točk 4(B)(1) in (3) ter točke 5(b) uvodnega dela poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP,
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 1.1.4 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries), as amended and adapted to the EEA Agreement by the sectorial adaptations referred to in Annex I to that Agreement, and in particular to Article 6(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 1.1.4 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav), kakor je bil spremenjen in prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s sektorskimi prilagoditvami iz Priloge I k navedenemu sporazumu, in zlasti člena 6(2) akta,
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 1.1.5 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC), as amended and adapted to the EEA Agreement by the sectorial adaptations referred to in Annex I to that Agreement, and in particular to Article 6(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 1.1.5 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 91/496/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o določitvi načel o organizaciji veterinarskih pregledov živali, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav, in o spremembi direktiv 89/662/EGS, 90/425/EGS ter 90/675/EGS), kakor je bil spremenjen in prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s sektorskimi prilagoditvami iz Priloge I k navedenemu sporazumu, in zlasti člena 6(4) akta,
EFTA Surveillance Authority (the Authority), by Decision No 43/10/COL of 10 February 2010 [1], repealed its Decision No 301/08/COL of 21 May 2008 [2] and drew up a new list of border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway approved for veterinary checks on live animal and animal products from third countries.The Government of Norway requested to add a new border inspection post (BIP) in Florø for the categories NHC-NT(6)(16) and to list a new BIP in Larvik for the category HC(2).
Nadzorni organ Efte je z Odločbo št. 43/10/COL z dne 10. februarja 2010 [1] razveljavil svojo Odločbo št. 301/08/COL z dne 21. maja 2008 [2] in sestavil nov seznam mejnih kontrolnih točk na Islandiji in na Norveškem, dogovorjenih za veterinarske preglede živih živali in živalskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav.Norveška vlada je zahtevala, da se dodata nova mejna kontrolna točka (MKT) v mestu Florø za kategorije NHC-NT(6)(16) in nova MKT v mestu Larvik za kategorijo HC(2).
The Government of Norway also requested to list additional categories in the inspection centre (IC) Skutvik under BIP Ålesund, HC-T(CH)(1)(2)(3), HC-NT(6) and NHC-NT(6) and to list an additional category in the BIP Kirkenes, HC-NT(1)(2)(3).
Norveška vlada zahteva tudi, da se kontrolnemu središču Skutvik v okviru MKT Ålesund dodajo kategorije: HC-T(CH)(1)(2)(3), HC-NT(6) in NHC-NT(6) ter da se MKT Kirkenes doda kategorija HC-NT(1)(2)(3).
From 8 to 12 November 2010, the Authority carried out a joint inspection with the European Commission.
Nadzorni organ in Evropska komisija sta od 8. do 12. novembra 2010 izvedla skupni pregled.
In the course of that inspection, the proposed border inspection posts of Larvik and Florø, as well as the border inspection posts of Ålesund Port (TRACES code NO AES 1), Kirkenes Port (TRACES code NO KKN 1) were visited.
V okviru tega pregleda so bile obiskane predlagani MKT Larvik in Florø ter MKT v pristanišču Ålesund (oznaka TRACES NO AES 1) in pristanišču Kirkenes (oznaka TRACES NO KKN 1).
On the basis on the observations made during the joint inspection, a common recommendation was signed on 12 November 2010 by inspectors of the Authority and of the European Commission.
Inšpektorji Nadzornega organa in Evropske komisije so 12. novembra 2010 na podlagi ugotovitev skupnega pregleda podpisali skupno priporočilo.
Accordingly, it is proposed to:
Zato se predlaga, da: