natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes that under Rule 94 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure, ‘the provisions governing the procedure for granting discharge to the Commission in accordance with Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in respect of the implementation of the budget, shall also apply to the procedure for granting discharge to: […] the persons responsible for the implementation of the budgets of other institutions and bodies of the European Union such as the Council […]’;
ugotavlja, da se v skladu s členom 94 Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta „[d]oločbe, ki v skladu s členom 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije urejajo postopek podelitve razrešnice Komisiji glede izvrševanja proračuna, […] smiselno uporabljajo tudi za postopek podelitve razrešnice: […] osebam, odgovornim za izvrševanje proračunov drugih institucij in organov Evropske unije, kot so Svet […]“;
Regrets that the Council continues to be silent in relation to the remarks made by Parliament in its discharge resolution of 27 April 2017 [1] on the trend from previous years;
obžaluje, da se Svet še vedno ni odzval na pripombe o trendu iz preteklih let, ki jih je Parlament zapisal v resoluciji o razrešnici z dne 27. aprila 2017 [1];
Notes with satisfaction that for the first time the Council provided the Parliament the 2015 annual activity reports of the Directorate-General for Administration, of the Legal Service and of the Directorate-General for Communication and Document Management; notes that the remaining directorates do not have authorising officers by delegation that implement Section II — European Council and Council — of the general budget of the European Union;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je Svet Parlamentu prvič predložil letna poročila o dejavnostih za leto 2015 za generalni direktorat za upravo, za pravno službo ter za generalni direktorat za komuniciranje in upravljanje dokumentov; ugotavlja, da preostali direktorati nimajo odredbodajalcev na podlagi prenosa, ki bi izvrševali oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet – splošnega proračuna Evropske unije;
Notes that, in March 2017, the coordinators of Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control decided to establish a working group, represented by all the political groups, to draft a proposal on the Council discharge exercise procedure; stresses that that proposal has now been approved by the Committee on Budgetary Control and sent to the Conference of Presidents, which is the body responsible for Parliament's interinstitutional relations;
ugotavlja, da so koordinatorji Odbora Parlamenta za proračunski nadzor marca 2017 ustanovili delovno skupino, v kateri so bile zastopane vse politične skupine in ki je pripravila predlog o postopku podelitve razrešnice Svetu; poudarja, da je Odbor za proračunski nadzor ta predlog zdaj že potrdil in poslal konferenci predsednikov, ki je organ, pristojen za medinstitucionalne odnose Parlamenta;
Regrets that the budget of the European Council and the budget of Council have not yet been separated, as recommended by Parliament in several of its recent discharge resolutions;
obžaluje, da proračun Evropskega sveta in proračun Sveta še nista bila ločena, kot je Parlament priporočil v več nedavnih resolucijah o razrešnicah;
Notes that the information on the Council's building policy provided on its website does not include details about the costs incurred in relation to the Council's buildings; is aware that occasionally information is exchanged between the building departments of Parliament and the Council; proposes that that exchange becomes regular and that detailed information be given to Parliament in the Council's annual financial report;
ugotavlja, da informacije o nepremičninski politiki Sveta, objavljene na njegovem spletišču, ne vključujejo podrobnosti o stroških, ki so nastali v zvezi s stavbami te institucije; se zaveda, da občasno poteka izmenjava informacij med oddelki za stavbe Parlamenta in Sveta; predlaga, da izmenjava postane redna in da Svet podrobne informacije vključi v letno finančno poročilo, ki ga posreduje Parlamentu;
Reiterates its call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date; calls for information on the costs related to the delayed completion of the Europa building;
ponovno poziva k poročilom o napredku nepremičninskih projektov in podrobni razčlenitvi doslej nastalih stroškov; poziva, da se zagotovijo informacije o stroških, povezanih z zamudo dokončanja stavbe Evropa;
Notes that new ethics guidelines for the Council were published in 2015 and are to be followed up by awareness-raising activities on ethics and integrity; regrets that the Council's whistleblowing rules continue to be publicly unavailable;
ugotavlja, da so bile leta 2015 objavljene nove etične smernice za Svet, ki bi jim morale slediti dejavnosti za ozaveščanje o etiki in integriteti; obžaluje, da pravila Sveta o prijavljanju nepravilnosti še vedno niso dostopna javnosti;
Welcomes the improvements made by the Council with regard to corporate policies, particularly transparency; regrets, however, that the Council has not yet joined the Union transparency register;
pozdravlja napredek Sveta v zvezi s korporativnimi politikami, zlasti preglednostjo; obžaluje pa, da se Svet še ni pridružil registru Unije za preglednost;
Urges the Council to develop detailed anti-corruption guidelines and independent policies within its structures;
odločno poziva Svet, naj oblikuje podrobne smernice za boj proti korupciji in neodvisne politike v organizaciji;
Regrets the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council; points out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 for the reasons set out in its resolutions of 10 May 2011 [2], 25 October 2011 [3], 10 May 2012 [4], 23 October 2012 [5], 17 April 2013 [6], 9 October 2013 [7], 3 April 2014 [8], 23 October 2014 [9], 29 April 2015 [10], 27 October 2015 [11], 28 April 2016 [12] and 27 October 2016 [13], and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2015 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 27 April 2017;
obžaluje, da so se v dosedanjih postopkih podelitve razrešnice vedno znova pojavljale težave, ker Svet ni bil pripravljen sodelovati; poudarja, da je Parlament zavrnil podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunska leta 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 in 2014 ter razloge za to navedel v resolucijah z dne 10. maja 2011 [2], 25. oktobra 2011 [3], 10. maja 2012 [4], 23. oktobra 2012 [5], 17. aprila 2013 [6], 9. oktobra 2013 [7], 3. aprila 2014 [8], 23. oktobra 2014 [9], 29. aprila 2015 [10], 27. oktobra 2015 [11], 28. aprila 2016 [12] in 27. oktobra 2016 [13], podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunsko leto 2015 pa je odložil zaradi razlogov, ki jih je navedel v resoluciji z dne 27. aprila 2017;
Notes that failure to grant discharge has not led to consequences of any kind; considers that the situation should nevertheless be resolved as rapidly as possible, principally in the interests of the citizens of the Union;
ugotavlja, da nepodelitev razrešnice ni imela nikakršnih posledic; meni, da bi bilo to situacijo treba čim prej rešiti, predvsem v interesu državljanov Unije;
Insists that an effective budgetary control exercise requires the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, as set out in Parliament's resolution of 27 April 2017; confirms that Parliament is unable to make an informed decision on granting discharge;
vztraja, da je za izvajanje učinkovitega proračunskega nadzora potrebno sodelovanje Parlamenta in Sveta, kot je zapisano v resoluciji Parlamenta z dne 27. aprila 2017; potrjuje, da Parlament ne more sprejeti informirane odločitve o podelitvi razrešnice;
Reminds the Council of the Commission's view, expressed in January 2014, that all institutions should be fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure;
opozarja Svet na stališče Komisije iz pisma iz januarja 2014, da bi morale biti vse institucije v celoti del procesa nadaljnjih ukrepov v zvezi z ugotovitvami Parlamenta v postopku podelitve razrešnice in da bi morale vse institucije v medsebojnem sodelovanju zagotoviti nemoten potek postopka razrešnice;
Notes that the Commission has stated that it will not oversee the implementation of the budget of the other institutions and that giving a response to questions addressed to another institution would infringe the autonomy of that institution to implement its own section of the budget;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija navedla, da ne bo nadzorovala izvrševanja proračunov drugih institucij in da bi odgovarjanje na vprašanja, naslovljenih na drugo institucijo, posegalo v avtonomijo te institucije pri izvrševanju lastnega dela proračuna;
Insists that the Council's expenditure must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and that the fundamental elements of such scrutiny have been laid down in Parliament's discharge resolutions of the past years;
vztraja, da je treba odhodke Sveta pregledovati na enak način kot odhodke drugih institucij in da so bili temeljni elementi takšnega pregledovanja določeni v resolucijah Parlamenta o podelitvi razrešnice iz preteklih let;
Emphasises Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge pursuant to Articles 316, 317 and 319 TFEU, in line with current interpretation and practice, namely to grant discharge of each heading of the budget individually in order to maintain transparency and democratic accountability towards Union taxpayers;
poudarja pristojnost Parlamenta za podelitev razrešnice na podlagi členov 316, 317 in 319 PDEU, ki je v skladu s sedanjo razlago in prakso, in sicer da razrešnico podeli za vsak proračunski naslov posebej, da se ohranita preglednost in demokratična odgovornost davkoplačevalcem Unije;
Considers that the lack of cooperation of the European Council and the Council with the discharge authority is a negative sign to the citizens of the Union.
meni, da je nezadostno sodelovanje Evropskega sveta in Sveta z organom za podelitev razrešnice negativno znamenje za državljane Unije.
Texts adopted of that date, P8_TA(2017)0147.
Sprejeta besedila, P8_TA(2017)0147.
OJ L 250, 27.9.2011, p.
UL L 250, 27.9.2011, str.
OJ L 313, 26.11.2011, p.
UL L 313, 26.11.2011, str.
OJ L 350, 20.12.2012, p.
UL L 350, 20.12.2012, str.
OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p.
UL L 328, 7.12.2013, str.
Resolution (EU) 2018/2072 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU) 2018/2072
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section II — European Council and Council
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2016, oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section II – European Council and Council,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2016, oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet,
B. Whereas Parliament's role in respect of the budget discharge is specified in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and in the Financial Regulation;
B. ker je vloga Parlamenta v postopku razrešnice za izvrševanje proračuna opredeljena v Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in finančni uredbi;
Recalls that the Union institutions have administrative autonomy in matters relating to their respective operations and underlines the importance of them acting responsibly in the implementation of their budgets;
opominja, da imajo institucije Unije upravno avtonomnost v zadevah, ki se nanašajo na njihovo lastno delovanje, in poudarja, kako pomembno je, da svoje proračune izvršujejo odgovorno;
Underlines the role of Parliament within the discharge procedure, as governed by the TFEU, the Financial Regulation and Parliament's Rules of Procedure;
poudarja vlogo Parlamenta v postopku razrešnice, kot jo določajo PDEU, finančna uredba in poslovnik Parlamenta;
Regrets that Council has not replied to the observations made by Parliament in its discharge resolution of 18 April 2018, following the trend from previous years;
obžaluje, da Svet podobno kot v preteklih letih ni odgovoril na ugotovitve iz resolucije Parlamenta o razrešnici z dne 18. aprila 2018;
Deeply regrets that the recommendations of Parliament have not been followed up at all and that no reason or justification has been given; insists that Council implement the observations made in Parliament's discharge resolution of 18 April 2018, in particular the observations below, and immediately react to the observations;
globoko obžaluje, da priporočila Parlamenta niso bila upoštevana, za kar ni bilo podanih nobenih razlogov ali utemeljitev; vztraja, da Svet upošteva ugotovitve iz resolucije o razrešnici Parlamenta z dne 18. aprila 2018, zlasti tiste v nadaljevanju, in se nemudoma odzove nanje;
Expresses support for the successful paradigm shift towards performance-based budgeting in the Commission's budget planning introduced in September 2015 as part of the ‘EU Budget Focused on Results’ initiative; encourages the European Council and the Council to apply the method to their own budget-planning procedure;
izraža podporo uspešni spremembi paradigme v smeri priprave proračuna glede na uspešnost pri proračunskem načrtovanju Komisije, ki je bile uvedena septembra 2015 v okviru pobude „Proračun EU, osredotočen na rezultate“; spodbuja Evropski svet in Svet, naj to metodo uporabita za svoj postopek proračunskega načrtovanja;
Regrets that the request for the budgets of the European Council and the Council to be separated, made by Parliament in previous discharge resolutions, has not been considered;
obžaluje, da zahteva za ločitev proračuna Evropskega sveta in Sveta, ki jo je Parlament izrazil v prejšnjih resolucijah o razrešnicah, ni bila upoštevana;
Notes that Council is still working on a reply to the European Ombudsman's strategic report on the ‘Transparency of the Council legislative process’ (OI/2/2017/TE), despite the fact that the European Ombudsman requested a reply to her recommendations and suggestions for improvements by 9 May 2018; acknowledges that Council is engaging in serious and thorough research in preparing its reply but nevertheless urges Council to respect the request of the Ombudsman; recalls that the European Ombudsman also sent her findings to Parliament and that two of its committees are currently working on a report on the findings for which reason Council is called upon to transmit its reply and findings to Parliament as soon as possible;
ugotavlja, da Svet še vedno pripravlja odgovor na strateško poročilo evropske varuhinje človekovih pravic o preglednosti zakonodajnega postopka v Svetu (OI/2/2017/TE), čeprav je zahtevala odgovor na svoja priporočila in predloge za izboljšave do 9. maja 2018; priznava, da Svet ta odgovor pripravlja resno in temeljito, vendar ga vseeno poziva, da spoštuje zahtevo varuhinje; spominja, da je varuhinja svoje ugotovitve poslala tudi Parlamentu in da dva izmed njegovih odborov trenutno pripravljata poročilo o njih, zato poziva Svet, naj svoj odgovor in ugotovitve čim prej posreduje Parlamentu;
Regrets that, despite the occasional exchange of information between the building departments of Parliament and Council, Council continues not to provide detailed information on its building policy in its annual financial report; regrets the lack of information on its buildings policy and related expenditures and asks for full public access to this information as a sign of transparency for Union citizens;
obžaluje, da kljub občasni izmenjavi informacij med oddelkoma za nepremičnine Parlamenta in Sveta Svet v letna finančna poročila še vedno ne vključuje podrobnih podatkov o svoji nepremičninski politiki; obžaluje, da so informacije o nepremičninski politiki in z njo povezanih stroških pomanjkljive, in poziva k neoviranemu dostopu javnosti do teh podatkov, da se državljanom Unije pošlje sporočilo o preglednosti;
Reiterates its call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date; takes note of the publication of the Final Financial Statements 2017 — the Council of the European Union and the European Council, dated 12 June 2018, which puts the cost of the Europa building at EUR 312143710,53;
ponovno poziva k poročilom o napredku nepremičninskih projektov in podrobni razčlenitvi doslej nastalih stroškov; je seznanjen, da je Svet objavil končne računovodske izkaze za leto 2017 – Svet Evropske unije in Evropski svet z dne 12. junija 2018, v katerem stroški stavbe Evropa znašajo 312143710,53 EUR;
Reiterates its call for an overview of human resources to be broken down by category, grade, gender, nationality and training;
znova poziva k razčlenitvi pregleda človeških virov po kategorijah, razredih, spolu, narodnosti in usposobljenosti;
Welcomes the ongoing inter-institutional negotiations to strengthen the Union transparency register; reiterates its call for a successful outcome of the negotiations that will lead to Council joining the register;
pozdravlja potekajoča medinstitucionalna pogajanja o izboljšavah registra Unije za preglednost; znova poziva k uspešnemu izidu pogajanj, namreč da se bo Svet pridružil temu registru;
Reiterates its call on Council to clarify what measures it has taken to overcome the irregular nomination of a judge to the Court of Justice of the European Union;
znova poziva Svet, naj pojasni, kakšne ukrepe je sprejel, da bi rešil zaplet zaradi nepravilnega imenovanja sodnika Sodišča Evropske unije;
Takes note of the decision by the United Kingdom to withdraw from the Union; observes that at this point no predictions can be made about the financial, administrative, human and other consequences related to the withdrawal; asks the European Council and the Council to perform impact assessments and to inform Parliament of the results by the end of the year 2018;
je seznanjen z odločitvijo Združenega kraljestva, da izstopi iz Unije; ugotavlja, da trenutno ni mogoče napovedati finančnih, upravnih, človeških in drugih posledic izstopa; poziva Evropski svet in Svet, naj opravita ocene učinka in Parlament do konca leta 2018 obvestita o rezultatih;
State of play
Sedanje stanje
Welcomes the informal exchanges that took place between Parliament and Council in order to discuss solutions to the current impasse in respect of the discharge procedure; notes that Council replied to the Parliament proposal on the Council discharge exercise procedure on 2 May 2018 with an amended proposal, and that following an informal meeting between Parliament and Council on 10 July 2018 the Budgetary Control Committee sent its reaction to Council's amended proposal on 21 July 2018; urges Council to react to the latest proposals from the Budgetary Control Committee swiftly, so that the new arrangements for the discharge exercise can be applied as soon as possible;
pozdravlja neuradno razpravo med Parlamentom in Svetom o rešitvah za trenutni zastoj v postopku razrešnice; je seznanjen, da je Svet na predlog Parlamenta o postopku podelitve razrešnice Svetu z dne 2. maja 2018 odgovoril s spremenjenim predlogom in da je Odbor za proračunski nadzor po neuradnem srečanju med Parlamentom in Svetom, ki je potekalo 10. julija 2018, 21. julija 2018 posredoval svoj odgovor na spremembe Sveta; poziva Svet, naj se na zadnji predlog Odbora za proračunski nadzor odzove hitro, da bo mogoče čim prej uporabiti novo ureditev za postopek razrešnice;
Regrets the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date which were due to a lack of cooperation from Council; points out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 for the reasons set out in its resolutions of 10 May 2011, 25 October 2011, 10 May 2012, 23 October 2012, 17 April 2013, 9 October 2013, 3 April 2014, 23 October 2014, 27 October 2015, 27 October 2016 and 25 October 2017 and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2016 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 18 April 2018;
obžaluje, da so se v dosedanjih postopkih podelitve razrešnice vedno znova pojavljale težave, ker Svet ni bil pripravljen sodelovati; poudarja, da Parlament ni podelil razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunska leta 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 in 2015 ter razloge za to navedel v resolucijah z dne 10. maja 2011, 25. oktobra 2011, 10. maja 2012, 23. oktobra 2012, 17. aprila 2013, 9. oktobra 2013, 3. aprila 2014, 23. oktobra 2014, 27. oktobra 2015, 27. oktobra 2016 in 25. oktobra 2017, podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunsko leto 2016 pa je odložil zaradi razlogov, ki jih je navedel v resoluciji z dne 18. aprila 2018;
Notes the Commission's view, expressed in January 2014, that all institutions are fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure;
je seznanjen s stališčem Komisije iz januarja 2014, da so vse institucije v celoti del procesa nadaljnjih ukrepov v zvezi z ugotovitvami Parlamenta v postopku razrešnice in da bi morale v medsebojnem sodelovanju zagotoviti nemoten potek tega postopka;
Notes that the Commission has stated that it will not oversee the implementation of the budget of the other institutions and that giving a response to questions addressed to another institution would infringe on the autonomy of that institution to implement its own section of the budget;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija navedla, da ne bo nadzorovala izvrševanja proračunov drugih institucij in da bi odgovarjanje na vprašanja, naslovljena na drugo institucijo, posegalo v avtonomijo te institucije pri izvrševanju lastnega dela proračuna;
Regrets that Council continues to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions;
obžaluje, da Svet še vedno ni odgovoril na vprašanja Parlamenta;
Insists that the expenditure of Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and that the fundamental elements of such scrutiny have been laid down in its discharge resolutions of the past years;
vztraja, da je treba odhodke Sveta pregledovati na enak način kot odhodke drugih institucij in da so bili temeljni elementi tega pregledovanja določeni v resolucijah o podelitvi razrešnice iz preteklih let;
Emphasises Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge pursuant to Articles 316, 317 and 319 TFEU, in line with current interpretation and practice, namely to grant discharge of each heading of the budget individually in order to maintain transparency and democratic accountability towards Union taxpayers.
opozarja na pristojnost Parlamenta za podelitev razrešnice na podlagi členov 316, 317 in 319 PDEU, ki je v skladu s sedanjo razlago in prakso, in sicer da razrešnico podeli za vsak proračunski naslov posebej, da se ohranita preglednost in demokratična odgovornost davkoplačevalcem Unije.
Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 23 January 2018, FV v Council of the European Union, T-639/16 P, ECLI:EU:T:2018:22.
Sodba splošnega sodišča (pritožbeni senat) z dne 23. januarja 2018, FV proti Svetu Evropske unije, T-639/16 P, ECLI:EU:T:2018:22.
OJ L 250, 27.9.2011, p. 25.
UL L 250, 27.9.2011, str. 25.
OJ L 313, 26.11.2011, p. 13.
UL L 313, 26.11.2011, str. 13.
OJ L 286, 17.10.2012, p. 23.
UL L 286, 17.10.2012, str. 23.
OJ L 350, 20.12.2012, p. 71.
UL L 350, 20.12.2012, str. 71.
OJ L 308, 16.11.2013, p. 22.
UL L 308, 16.11.2013, str. 22.
OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 97.
UL L 328, 7.12.2013, str. 97.
OJ L 266, 5.9.2014, p. 26.
UL L 266, 5.9.2014, str. 26.
OJ L 334, 21.11.2014, p. 95.
UL L 334, 21.11.2014, str. 95.