natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes with satisfaction that according to the annual activity report, as well as the Court of Auditors’ audit findings, the level and nature of transfers in 2012 have remained within the limits of the financial rules; commends the Authority for its good budgetary planning;
potrjuje, da je upravni odbor organa 19. novembra 2013 sprejel nova pravila o obvladovanju navzkrižij interesov v zvezi s člani odbora nadzornikov in upravnega odbora ter da je izvršni direktor sprejel podobna pravila v zvezi s člani osebja in pogodbenimi strankami; ugotavlja, da oba sklopa pravil vsebujeta jasne zahteve v zvezi z izjavami, opredelitev navzkrižij in kršitev ter postopke obvladovanja in sankcij;
Notes that for the year 2012, neither sampled transactions nor other audit findings have led to any comments on the Authority’s procurement procedures in the Court of Auditors’ annual audit report;
ugotavlja, da je zaradi proračunskega spremljanja v proračunskem letu 2012 skupna stopnja izvrševanja proračuna dosegla 90,63 %; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je bila stopnja izvrševanja plačil 67,21 %;
Notes that the Court of Auditors made no comments in its annual audit report for 2012 as regards the Authority’s recruitment procedures;
obžaluje, da je bila stopnja prenosa sredstev za prevzem obveznosti za naslov III (operativni odhodki) v leto 2013 zelo visoka, saj je znašala 79 % vseh proračunskih sredstev; potrjuje, da je to predvsem posledica kompleksnosti in dolgotrajnosti enega postopka oddaje javnega naročila na področju IT, za katerega je bila decembra 2012 v skladu z načrti podpisana pogodba v višini 2200000 EUR; ugotavlja, da je stopnja izvršitve odobrenih proračunskih sredstev za naslov III, prenesenih iz leta 2012, v letu 2013 dosegla 95 %;
Takes note that 342 posts out of 355 had been filled and that 124 contract agents and seconded national experts were employed by the Authority by the end of 2012; acknowledges the Authority’s improved occupation rate compared to 2011;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je iz letnega poročila o dejavnostih in ugotovitev revizije Računskega sodišča razvidno, da sta bili višina in narava prerazporeditev v letu 2012 skladni s finančnimi pravili;
Appreciates the public interest in the decision-making process within the Authority, which is done within its legal role and responsibilities; notes that it currently dedicates 70 % of its human resources to scientific activities, evaluation and data collection; encourages the Authority to progress further on this path;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je organ začel izvajati akcijski načrt, katerega cilj je izboljšati njegove postopke za oddajo javnih naročil, da bi bili popolnoma v skladu s pravili Unije o javnem naročanju;
Believes that the procedure for assessing possible conflicts of interest at the Authority, where declarations of interest are screened by Heads of Unit and are generally assessed on a case by case basis, is burdensome and is subject to criticism, raising questions about its credibility and effectiveness; notes with concern that even a revised procedure has not helped dispel fears about the Authority’s expert impartiality; calls on the Authority to come up with a simplified procedure with less uncertainty which would validate and streamline the process and save both human resources and money without, however, jeopardising the newly set standards for the detection and prevention of conflicts of interests;
obžaluje, da je bila ena pogodba za izdelavo finančne podatkovne zbirke razdeljena v štiri sklope, od katerih vsak obsega 60000 EUR, ki so bili vsi neposredno dodeljeni dvema podjetjema; meni, da bi bilo treba glede na skupno vrednost storitev, ki jih je treba pridobiti za isti projekt (240000 EUR), uporabiti odprti ali omejeni postopek in da so s tem povezane obveznosti in plačila zaradi tega nepravilni;
Welcomes the progress made by the Authority on its conflicts of interests policy; calls on the Authority to continue its work and to dedicate sufficient resources and staff to this matter, and to consider appointing specialised staff for the screening work on conflicts of interests;
pričakuje, zlasti ob upoštevanju zgoraj omenjenih postopkov javnega naročanja, da so vsi uslužbenci, ki pri tem sodelujejo, že bili ustrezno usposobljeni, tako da lahko dosledno uporabljajo novo finančno uredbo in da znajo presoditi, kdaj se javna naročila lahko delijo in kdaj ne;
Notes with concern that the Authority applies a less stringent conflicts of interest policy to experts from food safety organisations (FSOs), as the list which the Authority uses to indicate these FSOs includes institutes that are nominated by Member States and co-financed by private or undisclosed partners, creating a possible loophole;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je organ sprejel politiko in pravila glede obvladovanja navzkrižij interesov za člane odbora nadzornikov in upravnega odbora ter uslužbence in pogodbene stranke; potrjuje, da je organ leta 2011 sprejel pravila etičnega ravnanja in sprejel posebne določbe za interesne skupine in komisijo za pritožbe za obravnavno morebitnih navzkrižij interesov; poziva organ, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti, ali namerava ponovno pregledati svoja pravila etičnega ravnanja na podlagi smernic Komisije o preprečevanju in obvladovanju navzkrižja interesov v decentraliziranih agencijah EU;
Believes that the Authority should apply a two-year cooling-off period to all material interests related to the commercial agrifood sector, including research funding, consultancy contracts and decision-making positions in industry-captured organisations;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se organ trenutno posveča zasnovi svojega spletnega mesta, vključno z oblikovanjem spletne strani, ki bo namenjena navzkrižju interesov; ugotavlja, da življenjepisi in izjave o interesih članov upravnega odbora in odbora nadzornikov ter izjave o interesih izvršnega direktorja in najvišjih vodstvenih delavcev niso objavljeni; poziva organ, naj nemudoma odpravi to pomanjkljivost;
Believes that financial interests in particular should be dealt with the utmost care and that experts should be asked to declare whether their interests were remunerated or not; believes that if this is the case, the amount should be specified; is of the opinion that the current practice of experts anonymising their interests, for instance by using the expression ‘private company’, should not be accepted by the Authority;
je seznanjen z navedbami organa, da je Služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo (IAS) leta 2012 izvedla poglobljeno oceno prednostnih nalog revizije za naslednja leta, ki je opredelila najpomembnejša tveganja in strateški revizijski načrt za obdobje 2013–2015 ter navedla prihodnje revizijske teme; potrjuje, da je organ pripravil akcijski načrt, da bi obravnaval opredeljena visoko tvegana področja, in da je bil načrt dogovorjen z IAS;
Believes that that list should be revised by excluding organisations which receive more than 50 % of their funding from sources other than public sources, in order to avoid undue influence; notes that this currently appears to be the case only for the entries nominated by the Commission, while Member States use their own criteria; is of the opinion that experts should be allowed to cooperate with the Authority on the condition that they meet previously established criteria; expresses the opinion, however, that the status of FSO should not be extended to organisations and institutions which receive more than 50 % of their funding from private sources;
obžaluje, da ni bilo pripravljeno poročilo o fizičnem pregledu sredstev, izvedenem maja in junija 2012; poleg tega obžaluje, da organ ni sprejel nobenih postopkov ali smernic za fizični pregled opredmetenih sredstev;
Acknowledges that the Authority has initiated a review of the implementation of its independence policy in the last quarter of 2013 and that the results will be available by October 2014; believes that the current declarations of interests forms could be further improved and should include information, inter alia, on: (i) whether the interest declared was remunerated, (ii) the amount of the remuneration, (iii) the participation in industry-linked conferences and the institution/person covering the expenses;
je seznanjen s trditvami organa, da je sprejel popravne ukrepe, zlasti da je izpeljal usposabljanje in sprejel smernice za dokumentiranje postopkov v zvezi s sredstvi; poziva organ, naj obvesti organ za podelitev razrešnice, o izvajanju teh smernic in rezultatih popravnega ukrepa;
Regrets that the Management Board refused to elect its Chair and Vice-Chairs by open ballot, despite the recommendation of the discharge authority, and expects further transparency in this respect in the future electing procedure;
zahteva, da organ na dostopen način, predvsem prek spletnega mesta, sporoča rezultate svojega dela in učinke za evropske državljane;
Observes that the Authority engaged in a structured dialogue with civil society on matters relating to conflicts of interests; views this development in a positive manner and calls on the Authority to hold structured dialogue regularly in the future;
UL C 365, 13.12.2013, str.
Believes that the Authority should pay further attention to public opinion and to commit itself as much as possible to an open and transparent dialogue; welcomes the implementing rules for its Policy on Independence and Scientific Decision-Making Processes as adopted by the Authority’s Management Board in December 2011; welcomes in this context the improved presentation and accessibility of information and documents on the Authority’s homepage;
134.
Acknowledges from the Authority that a number of potential critical risks were identified in the operation of the Authority’s internal controls, particularly in the areas of data management, business continuity and IT security, by a high level risk assessment carried out by an external consultant in 2012 and by the assessment performed by the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS) in February 2013; notes that the Authority started a comprehensive self-assessment of its internal control system in 2012 and that the process of the implementation of corrective actions is on-going; expects the Authority to inform the discharge authority of the results of implementation of corrective actions;
UL L 331, 15.12.2010, str.
OJ C 365, 13.12.2013, p.
48.
120.
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega inštituta za inovacije in tehnologijo za proračunsko leto 2012
having regard to the Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2] (‘the Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 185 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Food Safety Authority [4], and in particular Article 44 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2], zlasti člena 185 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [3], zlasti člena 208 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 294/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2008 o ustanovitvi Evropskega inštituta za inovacije in tehnologijo [4], zlasti člena 21 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5],ob upoštevanju Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1271/2013 z dne 30. septembra 2013 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 208 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], zlasti člena 108 Delegirane uredbe,ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih sklepov in resolucij o razrešnici,
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2012
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A7-0234/2014),
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2012,
A. ker računovodski izkazi Evropskega inštituta za inovacije in tehnologijo (v nadaljevanju: inštitut) kažejo, da je končni proračun inštituta v proračunskem letu 2012 znašal 95300000 EUR v sredstvih za prevzem obveznosti, kar pomeni 48,87-odstotno povišanje v primerjavi z letom 2011 in 77090000 EUR v sredstvih za plačila,
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2012, together with the Institute’s replies [1],having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 (05849/2014 - C7-0054/2014),
B. ker je v skladu z računovodskimi izkazi inštituta celotni prispevek Unije v proračun inštituta za leto 2012 znašal 68697863 EUR, v primerjavi z 8043439,83 EUR v letu 2011,
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2], and in particular Article 185 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1922/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing a European Institute for Gender Equality [4], and in particular Article 15 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
C. ker je Računsko sodišče navedlo, da je prejelo zadostno zagotovilo o zanesljivosti letnih računovodskih izkazov inštituta za proračunsko leto 2012, vendar ni moglo pridobiti zadostnih primernih revizijskih dokazov o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (A7-0230/2014),
Osnova za mnenje s pridržkom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij
A. whereas according to its financial statements, the final budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality (‘the Institute’) for the financial year 2012 was EUR 7741800, representing an increase of 2,81 % compared to 2011; whereas the Institute’s entire budget derives from the Union budget,
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da je kakovost revizijskih potrdil v mnogih primerih neustrezna; je seznanjen s tem, da je inštitut konec leta 2012 uvedel dodatna naknadna preverjanja za nepovratna sredstva, ki se nanašajo na dejavnosti v letu 2011, da bi imel dodatno raven zagotovila o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, povezanih z nepovratnimi sredstvi, ki so jih opravila neodvisna revizijska podjetja in ki so bila ocenjena kot zanesljiva; obžaluje, da so rezultati naknadnih preverjanj potrdili, da predhodna preverjanja niso bila povsem uspešna;
B. whereas the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Institute’s annual accounts for the financial year 2012 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular,
obžaluje dejstvo, da za transakcije v zvezi z nepovratnimi sredstvi za dejavnosti v letu 2010 (11300000 EUR) niso bila izvedena naknadna preverjanja; obžaluje tudi dejstvo, da ni razumnega zagotovila, da so te transakcije zakonite in pravilne, ker je s predhodnimi preverjanji mogoče dobiti samo omejeno zagotovilo, in da Računsko sodišče ni moglo pridobiti zadostnih in ustreznih revizijskih dokazov o zakonitosti in pravilnosti revidiranih transakcij v zvezi z nepovratnimi sredstvi za dejavnosti v letu 2010;
Acknowledges from the Institute that it had adopted a number of short-term and long-term measures with the aim of improving budget planning and implementation, as well as ensuring a satisfactory budget implementation rate; notes that the Institute has also carried out a physical inventory and changed the process of the estimation of the accrued charges and that the Court of Auditors considers those actions ‘completed’;
Mnenje s pridržkom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij
Notes that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2012 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 95,56 % and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 63,95 %;
ugotavlja, da so po navedbah Računskega sodišča, razen v zvezi z morebitnimi učinki zadev, opisanih v osnovi za mnenje s pridržkom, transakcije, povezane z letnimi računovodskimi izkazi za proračunsko leto 2012 v vseh pomembnih pogledih zakonite in pravilne;
Acknowledges from the Institute that in the third quarter of 2014, it plans to create budget monitoring guidelines, including control functions and deviations, in order to ensure adequate monitoring and reporting of the budget implementation; calls on the Institute to inform the discharge authority of the state of play of this action;
ugotavlja, da je bilo leta 2012 razveljavljenih približno 10000000 EUR (45 %) od približno 22000000 EUR odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti in ki so bila prenesena iz leta 2011; je seznanjen s tem, da je visoka stopnja razveljavitev zlasti posledica nižjih stroškov od pričakovanih, ki so jih prijavili upravičenci v okviru sporazumov o nepovratnih sredstvih iz leta 2011 (9200000 EUR ali 92 % razveljavljenih prenosov);
Calls on the Institute to take into consideration in its annual work programme, when planning payment requirements and budgetary priorities, the activities set out in the cooperation plan it has agreed with the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je iz letnega poročila o dejavnostih in revizijskih ugotovitev Računskega sodišča razvidno, da sta bili višina in narava prerazporeditev v letu 2012 skladni s finančnimi pravili;
Notes that the Institute has reduced the overall level of carry-overs of committed appropriations from 50 % in 2011 to 32 % in 2012; points out that the carry-overs to 2013 amount to EUR 2500000 and mainly concern title II (administrative expenditure), amounting to EUR 300000, and title III (operational expenditure), amounting to EUR 2100000, representing 23 % and 59 % of the corresponding committed appropriations; acknowledges that carry-overs for title II mainly relate to commitments made at the end of 2012 in connection with the move to a new premises, which took place in January 2013, while carry-overs for title III mainly relate to procurement procedures that were concluded late in 2012; notes, furthermore, that 7 % of committed appropriations carried over from 2011 to 2012 had not been used and had to be cancelled;
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče v letnem revizijskem poročilu za leto 2012 na osnovi vzorčnih transakcij in drugih revizijskih ugotovitev ni imelo pripomb glede postopkov javnih naročil v inštitutu;
Notes with satisfaction that according to the annual activity report, as well as the Court of Auditors’ audit findings, the level and nature of transfers in 2012 have remained within the limits of the financial rules; commends the Institute for its good budgetary planning;
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče v letnem revizijskem poročilu za leto 2012 ni imelo pripomb glede postopkov zaposlovanja v inštitutu;
Calls on the Institute to address the shortcomings identified by the Court of Auditors in the Institute’s documentation of recruitment procedures; notes in particular that there was no evidence that questions for written tests and interviews, as well as their respective weightings, were prepared before the examination of the applications;
potrjuje, da ima inštitut dva okvirna predpisa za regulacijo navzkrižja interesov; poziva inštitut, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti, ali namerava posodobiti te okvirne predpise v skladu s smernicami Komisije za preprečevanje in obvladovanje navzkrižja interesov v decentraliziranih agencijah EU;
Notes with concern that the Institute does not have a formalised procurement planning and monitoring procedure; notes in particular that its annual work programme does not include a procurement schedule linked to the planned activities that would define the optimal scope and timing of procurements;
ugotavlja, da izjave o interesih članov upravnega odbora, izvršnega direktorja in najvišjih vodstvenih delavcev niso objavljene; inštitut poziva, naj to pomanjkljivost nemudoma odpravi;
Acknowledges from the Institute that, in order to improve the planning and monitoring of the procurement, it is currently developing a monitoring tool to follow up the expected dates of each step of the annual procurement proceedings; calls on the Institute to inform the discharge authority when this tool is fully implemented and, up until then, to keep it informed of the state of play regarding its development and implementation;
je seznanjen s trditvami inštituta, da je leta 2012 služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo (IAS) izvedla neodvisno oceno primernosti zasnove notranjih kontrolnih sistemov, povezanih s pripravo letnih sporazumov o nepovratnih sredstvih, katere posledica so bila eno kritično in štiri zelo pomembna priporočila inštitutu;
Acknowledges that the Institute’s conflict of interests policy was presented to the Commission for consultation on 12 November 2013; calls on the Institute to inform the discharge authority of the results of that consultation and of the final adoption of its conflict of interests policy;
je seznanjen s tem, da je inštitut po oceni, ki jo je izvedla služba IAS, pripravil akcijski načrt za obravnavo kritičnega priporočila s skupno 11 ukrepi, od katerih jih je bilo osem načrtovanih za izvedbo pred 31. julijem 2013; je seznanjen s tem, da bodo štiri zelo pomembna priporočila upoštevana z izvedbo skupno 12 ukrepov (treh pred 31. julijem 2013); poleg tega je seznanjen s tem, da služba IAS meni, da akcijski načrt ustrezno obravnava tveganja in jih bo ublažil, če bo izveden pravočasno;