natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular Annex 1 to the letter from the Ministry of Trade and Industry dated 15 June 2001: Letter dated 5 June 2001 from the Municipality of Oslo to the Ministry of Trade and Industry.
Zlasti Priloga 1 k pismu Ministrstva za trgovino in industrijo z dne 15. junija 2001: Pismo občine Oslo z dne 5. junija 2001 za Ministrstvo za trgovino in industrijo.
The relevant sentence reads as follows in Norwegian: ‘Oslo Kommune er av den oppfatning at salget e r innenfor rammen av de krav som stilles i ESAs retningslinjer’.
Zadevni stavek se v norveškem jeziku glasi: „Oslo Kommune er av den oppfatning at salget e r innenfor rammen av de krav som stilles i ESAs retningslinjer.“
More detailed descriptions of the sales process and the value assessments are given in point 2 below.
Prodajni postopek in ocene vrednosti so podrobneje opisani v točki 2 spodaj.
The relevant sentence reads as follows in Norwegian: ‘Dette tidspresset kan ha ført til at kretsen av interesserte ble mindre enn ønskelig, og/eller at kjøperne la inn lavere bud enn de ville gjort i en situasjon med bedre tid’.
Zadevni stavek se v norveškem jeziku glasi: „Dette tidspresset kan ha ført til at kretsen av interesserte ble mindre enn ønskelig, og/eller at kjøperne la inn lavere bud enn de ville gjort i en situasjon med bedre tid.“
The sentences read as follows in Norwegian: ‘Denne “portøfaljetakst” følger ikke Norges Takseringsforbunds instruks for boligtaksering.
Stavka se v norveškem jeziku glasita: „Denne ‚portøfaljetakst‘ følger ikke Norges Takseringsforbunds instruks for boligtaksering.
Sale of 40000 m2 (sectioning) after 10 years in net present value terms.
Prodaja 40000 m2 (prodaja po enotah) po 10 letih v neto sedanji vrednosti.
The letter is enclosed as Annex 20 to the notification dated 7 February 2003.
Pismo je priloženo kot Priloga 20 k priglasitvi z dne 7. februarja 2003.
The sentence reads as follows in Norwegian: ‘Verdivurderingen foretatt av OPAK kan slik vi ser det ikke sies å tilfredsstille de krav som stilles til takst i ESAs retningslinjer’.
Stavek se v norveškem jeziku glasi: „Verdivurderingen foretatt av OPAK kan slik vi ser det ikke sies å tilfredsstille de krav som stilles til takst i ESAs retningslinjer.“
The word ‘takstnemd’ is used in Norwegian.
V norveškem jeziku se uporablja beseda „takstnemd“.
Chapter 18B.2.2(b) states i.a. that: ‘If, after a reasonable effort to sell the land and buildings at the market value, it is clear that the value set by the valuer cannot be obtained, a divergence of up to 5 % from that value can be deemed to be in line with market conditions’.
Poglavje 18B.2.2(b) med drugim navaja: „Če postane po razumnih prizadevanjih za prodajo zemljišč in objektov po tržni vrednosti jasno, da ni mogoče doseči vrednosti, ki jo je določil cenilec, se domneva, da je do 5-odstotno odstopanje od te vrednosti v skladu z razmerami na trgu.“
Sectioning means that the apartments are put up for sale instead of letting them.
„Sectioning“ (prodaja po delih) pomeni, da se stanovanja prodajo, namesto da se oddajajo.
See for example ECJ Case 78/76, Steinike und Weilig v Germany [1977] ECR 595 or ECJ Case 248/84, Germany v Commission [1987] ECR 4013, para. 17.
Glej na primer zadevo SES 78/76, Steinike in Weilig proti Nemčiji (1977) PSES 595 ali zadevo SES 248/84, Nemčija proti Komisiji (1987) PSES 4013, odstavek 17.
Five companies submitted the following offers in the first round on 2 May 2001.
Pet podjetij je predložilo naslednje ponudbe v prvem krogu 2. maja 2001.
Fredensborg referred to a previous letter dated 18 February 2003, received and registered by the Authority on 20 February 2003 (Doc. No: 03-1040 A), whereby two new value assessments were submitted.
Fredensborg se je skliceval na predhodno pismo z dne 18. februarja 2003, ki ga je Nadzorni organ prejel in evidentiral 20. februarja 2003 (Dok. št.: 03-1040 A), s katerim sta bili predloženi dve novi oceni vrednosti.
Fredensborg considered it important ‘to stress the difference between a theoretic best case “value” considering the successful implementation and carrying out of a real-estate project and an investor's willingness to enter into a specific project that to a large extent involves a project risk.’
Fredensborg je menil, da je pomembno „poudariti razliko med teoretično vrednostjo v najboljšem primeru ob upoštevanju uspešnega izvajanja nepremičninskega projekta ter vlagateljevo pripravljenostjo, da vstopi v določen projekt, ki v veliki meri vključuje projektno tveganje“.
Fredensborg considered that this project risk was not taken into account in the FIGA/Nortakst or Catella appraisals.
Fredensborg je menil, da to projektno tveganje ni bilo upoštevano v ocenah podjetij FIGA/Nortakst ali Catella.
The net worth of sectioning and rent revenues in 2001 is made up of three components: a) sectioning/sales value in 2011.
Neto vrednost prihodkov od prodaje po delih in najemnin v letu 2001 je sestavljena iz treh delov: (a) vrednosti prodaje po delih v letu 2011.
This worth arises in the years 2011-2014 and is written back to 2001, b) the capitalised worth of the further rent revenue flow from the non-sectioned areas, written back to 2001 and c) deductions for refurbishment/upgrading costs necessary to achieve the required standard for sectioning, carried out in the years 2011-2013 and written back to 2001.
Ta vrednost izhaja iz obdobja 2011–2014 in se diskontira na leto 2001, (b) kapitalizirane vrednosti nadaljnjega toka prihodkov od najemnin za neprodane površine, ki se diskontira na leto 2001, in (c) odbitkov za stroške obnove/posodobitve, potrebne za doseganje zahtevanega standarda za prodajo po delih, izvedenih v obdobju 2011–2013 in preračunanih na leto 2001.
In addition, the appraisal done by Catella had several other shortcomings, according to the Municipality of Oslo.
Poleg tega je bilo po mnenju občine Oslo v oceni, ki jo je opravilo podjetje Catella, več drugih pomanjkljivosti.
Based on new ‘corrected’ assumptions, Agdestein found that the adjusted value in the Catella report was NOK 744 Million, in the OPAK report NOK 560 Million and in the FIGA/Nortakst report NOK 560 Million (or 760 NOK Million if the value of the sectioning was kept at NOK 200 Million) [18]. Agdestein concluded that the market value of the portfolio (in May 2001) was between NOK 670 Million and NOK 800 Million.
Na podlagi „popravljenih“ predpostavk je Agdestein ugotovil, da je popravljena vrednost v poročilu podjetja Catella znašala 744 milijonov NOK, v poročilu podjetja OPAK 560 milijonov NOK in v poročilu podjetij FIGA/Nortakst 560 milijonov NOK (ali 760 milijonov NOK, če bi vrednost prodaje po delih prinesla 200 milijonov NOK) [18].Agdestein je zaključil, da je bila tržna vrednost portfelja (maja 2001) med 670 in 800 milijoni NOK.
The sale of the apartments was not made public in the way prescribed in clause 18B.2.1(a) of the Guidelines’. However, the Municipality considered that the sale was carried out in a way that ensured attainment of the objective behind the provision.
Prodaja stanovanj ni bila objavljena tako, kot je določeno v določbi 18B.2.1(a) smernic.“ Vendar pa je občina menila, da je bila prodaja opravljena na način, ki je zagotavljal dosego cilja določbe.
Holm therefore concluded that: ‘The result of this is that the useful application of the valuations in the context in which they are envisaged to be applied is limited’. His conclusions concerning the different appraisals in relation to his own findings and assumptions are as follows:
Holm je zato zaključil: „Posledica tega je, da je koristna uporaba ocen v okviru, v katerem naj bi se uporabile, omejena.“ Njegovi zaključki v zvezi z različnimi ocenami v primerjavi z njegovimi lastnimi ugotovitvami in predpostavkami so naslednji:
Recommendation of the EFTA Surveillance Authority
Priporočilo Nadzornega organa EFTE
No 59/05/COL
št. 59/05/COL
on the co-ordinated inspection programme in the field of animal nutrition for 2005
o usklajenem programu nadzora na področju prehrane živali za leto 2005
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 109 and Protocol 1 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru in zlasti člena 109 in Protokola 1 Sporazuma,
Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, and in particular Article 5(2)(b) and Protocol 1 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi Nadzornega organa in Sodišča ter zlasti člena 5(2)(b) in Protokola 1 Sporazuma,
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 31a of Chapter II of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 95/53/EC of 25 October 1995 fixing the principles governing the organization of inspections in the field of animal nutrition [1]), as amended, and as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, and in particular Article 22(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 31a poglavja II Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 95/53/ES z dne 25. oktobra 1995 o določitvi načel izvajanja uradnega nadzora na področju prehrane živali [1]), kakor je bil spremenjen in prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu, in zlasti njenega člena 22(3),
In 2004 the EFTA States identified certain issues as worthy of a co-ordinated inspection programme to be carried out in 2005.
Države Efte so leta 2004 opredelile nekatera vprašanja, za katera je primerno izvesti usklajeni program nadzora v letu 2005.
Although the Act referred to at Point 33 of Chapter II of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on undesirable substances in animal feed [2]), as amended, establishes maximum contents of aflatoxin B1 in feedingstuffs, there are no EEA rules for other mycotoxins, such as ochratoxin A, zearalenone, deoxynivalenol and fumonisins.
Čeprav akt iz točke 33 poglavja II Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva 2002/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. maja 2002 o nezaželenih snoveh v živalski krmi [2]), kakor je bil spremenjen, določa največjo vsebnost aflatoksina B1 v krmi, ne obstajajo predpisi EGP za druge mikotoksine, kakor so ohratoksin A, zearalenon, deoksinivalenol in fumonizini.
Antibiotics, other than coccidiostats and histomonostats, may be marketed and used as feed additives only until 31 December 2005.
Antibiotike, razen kokcidiostatikov in histomonostatikov, je mogoče tržiti in jih uporabljati kot krmne dodatke le do 31. decembra 2005.
Previous checks for the presence of antibiotics and coccidiostats in certain feedingstuffs where some of those substances are not authorised indicate that this type of infringement still occurs.
Prejšnji pregledi za ugotavljanje prisotnosti antibiotikov in kokcidiostatikov v posameznih krmilih, pri katerih nekatere od navedenih snovi niso dovoljene, so pokazali, da še vedno prihaja do tovrstnih kršitev.
The frequency of such findings and the sensitivity of this matter justify the continuation of checks.
Zaradi pogostosti tovrstnih ugotovitev in občutljivosti tega problema je nadaljevanje pregledov upravičeno.
It is important to ensure that the restrictions on the use of feed materials of animal origin in feedingstuffs, as laid down in the relevant EEA legislation, are effectively enforced.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da se omejitve uporabe posamičnih krmil živalskega izvora v krmi, kakor določa ustrezna zakonodaja EGP, dejansko izvajajo.
The participation of Norway and Iceland in the programmes within the scope of Annex II of this Recommendation concerning substances not authorised as feed additives will have to be evaluated with respect to their exemptions from Chapter II of Annex I to the EEA Agreement and, in particular, from the Act referred to at Point 1a of Chapter II of Annex I to the EEA Agreement, Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition.
O udeležbi Norveške in Islandije pri programih iz področja uporabe Priloge II k temu priporočilu glede snovi, ki niso dovoljene kot krmni dodatki, bo treba presoditi glede na njuna odstopanja od poglavja II Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP in zlasti od akta iz točke 1a poglavja II Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Uredba (ES) št. 1831/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2003 o dodatkih za uporabo v prehrani živali).
The participation of Iceland in the programmes within the scope of Annex III of this Recommendation concerning restrictions on the production and use of feed materials of animal origin will have to be evaluated with respect to its exemptions from Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement.
O udeležbi Islandije pri programih iz področja uporabe Priloge III k temu priporočilu glede omejitev proizvodnje in uporabe posamičnih krmil živalskega izvora bo treba presoditi glede na njena odstopanja od poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP.
It is appropriate to ensure that the levels of the trace elements copper and zinc in compound feedingstuffs for pigs do not exceed the maximum content laid down by the Act referred to at Point 1zq of Chapter II of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1334/2003 of 25 July 2003 amending the conditions for authorisation of a number of additives in feedingstuffs belonging to the group of trace elements [3]), as amended.
Primerno je zagotoviti, da vsebnosti elementov v sledovih, in sicer bakra in cinka, v krmnih mešanicah za prašiče ne presegajo zgornje mejne vrednosti, določene z aktom iz točke 1zq poglavja II Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1334/2003 z dne 25. julija 2003 o spremembi pogojev za dovoljenje za več krmnih dodatkov, ki spadajo v skupino elementov v sledovih [3]), kakor je bil spremenjen.
The participation of Norway in the programmes within the scope of Annex IV will have to be evaluated with respect to its exemptions from Chapter II of Annex I to the EEA Agreement.
O udeležbi Norveške pri programih iz področja uporabe Priloge IV bo treba presoditi glede na njena odstopanja od poglavja II Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP.
The measures provided for in this Recommendation are in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Plants and Animal Feedingstuffs Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem priporočilom, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za rastline in živalsko krmo Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu Efte –
It is recommended that the EFTA States carry out during 2005 a co-ordinated inspection programme aimed to check:
Priporoča se, da države Efte v letu 2005 izvedejo usklajeni program nadzora, katerega namen je preveriti:
the concentration of mycotoxins (aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, deoxynivalenol and fumonisins) in feedingstuffs, indicating the methods of analysis; the method of sampling should comprise both random and targeted sampling; in the case of targeted sampling, the samples should be feed materials suspected of containing higher concentrations of mycotoxins, such as cereal grains, oil seeds, oil fruits, their products and by-products, and feed materials stored for a long time or transported by sea over a long distance; in the case of aflatoxin B1, particular attention should also be paid to compound feedingstuffs for dairy animals other than dairy cattle; the results of the checks should be reported using the model set out in Annex I;
koncentracijo mikotoksinov (aflatoksina B1, ohratoksina A, zearalenona, deoksinivalenola in fumonizinov) v krmi z navedbo analiznih metod; metoda vzorčenja mora vsebovati naključno in ciljno vzorčenje; pri ciljnem vzorčenju se jemljejo vzorci posamičnih krmil, za katera se sumi, da vsebujejo višje koncentracije mikotoksinov, na primer žitnih zrn, oljnih semen in plodov, njihovih proizvodov in stranskih proizvodov, ter posamičnih krmil, ki se dlje časa skladiščijo ali prevažajo po morju na velike razdalje; v primeru aflatoksina B1 je posebna pozornost potrebna zlasti pri krmnih mešanicah za molznice, ki niso krave molznice; o rezultatih pregledov je treba poročati na podlagi vzorca, navedenega v Prilogi I;
antibiotics, coccidiostats and/or histomonostats, whether or not authorised as feed additives for certain animal species and categories, that occur frequently in non-medicated pre-mixtures and compound feedingstuffs in which these medicinal substances are not authorised; the checks should target those medicinal substances in pre-mixtures and compound feedingstuffs if the competent authority considers that there is a greater probability of finding irregularities; the results of the checks should be reported using the model set out in Annex II;
antibiotike, kokcidiostatike in/ali histomonostatike, ne glede na to ali so dovoljeni kot krmni dodatki za nekatere živalske vrste in kategorije, ki so pogosti v nemediciranih premiksih in krmnih mešanicah, v katerih te zdravilne učinkovine niso dovoljene; pregledi morajo biti usmerjeni na navedene zdravilne snovi v premiksih in krmnih mešanicah, kadar pristojni organ meni, da obstaja večja verjetnost za odkritje nepravilnosti; o rezultatih pregledov je treba poročati na podlagi vzorca, navedenega v Prilogi II;
the implementation of restrictions on the production and use of feed materials of animal origin, as set out in Annex III;
izvajanje omejitev proizvodnje in uporabe posamičnih krmil živalskega izvora, kakor je navedeno v Prilogi III;
It is recommended that EFTA States include the results of the co-ordinated inspection programme provided for in paragraph 1 in a separate Chapter in the annual report on inspection activities to be transmitted to the EFTA Surveillance Authority by 1 April 2006 in accordance with Article 22(2) of Act referred to at Point 31a of Chapter II of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 95/53/EC of 25 October 1995 fixing the principles governing the organization of inspections in the field of animal nutrition) and the latest version of the harmonised reporting model.
Priporoča se, da države Efte vključijo rezultate usklajenega programa nadzora iz odstavka 1 v ločeno poglavje letnega poročila o inšpekcijskih nadzornih dejavnostih, ki ga je treba do 1. aprila 2006 predložiti Nadzornemu organu Efte, v skladu s členom 22(2) akta iz točke 31a poglavja II Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 95/53/ES z dne 25. oktobra 1995 o določitvi načel izvajanja uradnega nadzora na področju prehrane živali) in najnovejšo različico usklajenega vzorca za poročanje.
Concentration of certain mycotoxins (aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, deoxynivalenol, fumonisins) in feedingstuffs
Koncentracija nekaterih mikotoksinov (aflatoksina B1, ohratoksina A, zearalenona, deoksinivalenola in fumonizinov) v krmi
the methods of analysis used;
uporabljene analizne metode;
Certain antibiotics, coccidiostats and other medicinal substances may be legally present as additives in pre-mixtures and compound feedingstuffs for certain species and categories of animals, when fulfilling the requirements of Article 10 of the Act referred to at Point 1a of Chapter II of Annex I to the EEA Agreement, (Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition [1]).The presence of unauthorised medicinal substances in feedingstuffs constitutes an infringement.
Nekateri antibiotiki, kokcidiostatiki in druge zdravilne snovi so lahko zakonito prisotni kot dodatki v premiksih in krmnih mešanicah za nekatere vrste in kategorije živali, če izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 10 akta iz točke 1a poglavja II Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Uredba (ES) št. 1831/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2003 o dodatkih za uporabo v prehrani živali [1]).Prisotnost nedovoljenih zdravilnih snovi v krmi pomeni kršitev.
The medicinal substances to be controlled should be chosen from the following:
Kot predmet nadzora se lahko izberejo naslednje zdravilne snovi:
other antimicrobial substances
druge antimikrobne snovi
Individual results of all non-compliant samples; model for reports as referred to in paragraph 1(b)
Posamezni rezultati vseh vzorcev, ki niso v skladu z zahtevami; vzorec za poročila, kakor je naveden v odstavku 1(b)
the total number of samples tested;
skupno število testiranih vzorcev;
the names of the substances which have been investigated;
imena preiskovanih snovi;
Without prejudice to Articles 3 to 13 and 15 of Directive 95/53/EC, EFTA States should during 2005 undertake a co-ordinated inspection programme to determine whether restrictions on the production and use of feed materials of animal origin have been complied with.
Brez poseganja v člene 3 do 13 in 15 Direktive 95/53/ES bi morale države Efte v letu 2005 izvesti usklajeni program nadzora, da bi ugotovile, ali so bile omejitve proizvodnje in uporabe posamičnih krmil živalskega izvora upoštevane.
In particular, in order to ensure that the ban on feeding processed animal protein to certain animals, as laid down in Annex IV of the Act referred to at Point 7.1.12 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies [1]), are effectively applied, EFTA States should implement a specific control programme based on targeted controls.
Zlasti zato, da bi zagotovili učinkovito izvajanje prepovedi krmljenja nekaterih živali s predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami, kakor določa Priloga IV akta iz točke 7.1.12 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Uredba (ES) št. 999/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2001 o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij [1]), morajo države Efte izvajati poseben program nadzora, ki temelji na usmerjenem nadzoru.
In accordance with Article 4 of Directive 95/53/EC, that control programme should be based on a risk-based strategy where all stages of production and all types of premises where feed is produced, handled and administered are included.
V skladu s členom 4 Direktive 95/53/ES mora navedeni program nadzora temeljiti na strategiji upoštevanja tveganj ter vključevati vse stopnje proizvodnje in vse vrste prostorov, v katerih krmo proizvajajo, z njo rokujejo in upravljajo.
The EFTA States should pay special attention to the definition of criteria that can be related to a risk.
Države Efte morajo posebno pozornost usmeriti na opredelitev meril, ki se lahko povežejo s tveganjem.
The inspection frequency and the number of samples analysed in the premises should be in correlation to the sum of weightings allocated to those premises.The following indicative premises and criteria should be considered when drawing up a control programme:
Pogostost inšpekcijskega nadzora in število vzorcev, analiziranih v prostorih, mora biti sorazmerna z vsoto ponderjev, ki so dodeljeni navedenim prostorom.Naslednji prostori in merila se upoštevajo kot okvir za oblikovanje programa nadzora:
Home mixers using derogated processed animal proteins
Domače mešalne naprave in uporaba predelanih živalskih beljakovin, ki so predmet odstopanja
As an alternative to these indicative premises and criteria, the EFTA States may forward their own risk assessment to the EFTA Surveillance Authority before 31 March 2005.
Namesto navedenih prostorov in meril lahko države Efte do 31. marca 2005 pošljejo Nadzornemu organu Efte svojo oceno tveganja.
In 2005, the EFTA States should focus on the analysis of sugar beet pulp and imported feed materials.
V letu 2005 morajo države Efte izvajati predvsem analize pulpe sladkorne pese in posamičnih uvoženih krmil.
The minimum number of inspections per year in an EFTA State should be 10 per 100000 tonnes of compound feed produced.
Najmanjše število inšpekcijskih nadzorov na leto v državi Efte mora biti 10 na 100000 ton proizvedene krmne mešanice.
The minimum number of official samples per year in an EFTA State should be 20 per 100000 tonnes of compound feed produced.
Najmanjše število uradnih vzorcev na leto v državi Efte mora biti 20 na 100000 ton proizvedene krmne mešanice.