natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Acknowledges the fact that, according to the Court's report, the Joint Undertaking's accounts for the period 27 June to 31 December 2014 present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the period then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission's accounting officer;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da v skladu s poročilom Računskega sodišča letni računovodski izkazi Skupnega podjetja za obdobje od 27. junija 2014 do 31. decembra 2014 v vseh pomembnih točkah pošteno predstavljajo njegov finančni položaj dne 31. decembra 2014 ter njegov poslovni izid in denarne tokove za tedaj končano obdobje, kar je v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil in računovodskimi pravili, ki jih je sprejel računovodja Komisije;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking's final budget for the financial year 2014 included commitment appropriations of EUR 160114500 and payment appropriation of EUR 104144250;
ugotavlja, da je končni proračun skupnega podjetja za proračunsko leto 2014 vključeval odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v višini 160114500 EUR in odobritve plačil v višini 104144250 EUR;
Regrets the absence of information regarding in-kind and cash contribution; calls on the Court to include, in future reports, provisions regarding the evaluation procedure and level of in-kind and cash-paid contribution, separately, for FP7 and Horizon 2020;
obžaluje, da ni informacij o prispevkih v naravi in gotovini; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v prihodnja poročila vključi določbe o postopku ocenjevanja in stopnji prejetih prispevkov v naravi in gotovini za sedmi okvirni program in program Obzorje 2020 posebej;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking’s programmes funded under FP7 are ongoing; encourages the Joint Undertaking to conduct its budget planning carefully, taking into due account the parallel process;
ugotavlja, da še potekajo programi skupnega podjetja, ki se financirajo po sedmem okvirnem programu; spodbuja skupno podjetje, naj skrbno načrtuje svoj proračun in ustrezno upošteva vzporedni proces;
Acknowledges the fact that, according to the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014, practical arrangements have been put in place in order to implement the obligations provided for in the Joint Undertaking’s administrative agreements by the introduction of the specific reporting form ‘end-of-project certificate’; notes that the Joint Undertaking has introduced such a form to the National Funding Authorities (‘NFAs’);
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je skupno podjetje v skladu z zaključnim računom proračunsko leto 2014 z uvedbo posebnega obrazca za poročanje „potrdilo o končanem projektu“ s praktičnimi rešitvami izvedlo obveznosti iz svojih upravnih sporazumov; je seznanjen, da je skupno podjetje ta obrazec predložilo nacionalnim organom financiranja;
Acknowledges the fact that the Joint Undertaking elaborated in 2014 a checklist including the essential elements of an assurance system and engaged in intensive exchanges with the NFAs to assess the assurance provided by the national systems; notes that the assessment has been completed for five contributors, representing 54,2 % of the grants awarded by the Joint Undertaking and that one more contributor, representing 18,9 % of the grants awarded by the Joint Undertaking, has been reviewed, although update on it was pending at the time of the audit;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je skupno podjetje leta 2014 izdelalo seznam najpomembnejših sestavnih delov zavarovalnega sistema in da je pri oceni zavarovanja, ki ga zagotavljajo nacionalni sistemi, temeljito razpravljalo z nacionalnimi organi financiranja; ugotavlja, da je bila ocena zaključena za pet plačnikov, to je 54,2 % dodeljenih nepovratnih sredstev skupnega podjetja, in da je bil pregledan še en plačnik, to je 18,9 % dodeljenih nepovratnih sredstev skupnega podjetja, čeprav v času revizije o tem še ni bilo zadnjih podatkov;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking estimated the residual error rate at 0,73 %; observes, however, that the Joint Undertaking failed to convey how many transactions were involved to calculate such a rate and therefore, asks the Joint Undertaking to supply that information;
ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje stopnjo preostale napake ocenilo na 0,73 %; ugotavlja pa tudi, da ni navedlo, koliko transakcij je bilo pri izračunu take stopnje upoštevanih in ga zato poziva, naj to informacijo priskrbi;
Points out that, despite all the above, the Court has issued a qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts on the grounds that the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs regarding the audit of project cost claims do not include practical arrangements for ex post audits;
poudarja, da je Računsko sodišče izdalo mnenje s pridržkom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, povezanih z letnimi računovodskimi izkazi, saj upravni sporazumi, ki so bili z nacionalnimi organi za financiranje podpisani v zvezi z revizijami zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov za projekte, ne vključujejo praktične ureditve za naknadne revizije;
Notes that, according to the Court's report, the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of the audit reports received from the NFAs concerning the costs relating to completed projects; notes, furthermore, that, after an assessment of the audit strategies of three of the NFAs, it was not possible to conclude whether ex post audits are functioning effectively due to different methodologies used by NFAs which did not allow the Joint Undertaking to calculate either a weighted error rate or a residual error rate; notes that this technical difficulty does not, however, result in the Court’s negative opinion, but understandably prevents it from confirming the legality and regularity of the transactions without formulating a reservation; notes also that the Joint Undertaking has confirmed that its extensive assessment of the national assurance systems concluded that they can provide a reasonable protection of the financial interests of its members;
ugotavlja, da glede na poročilo Računskega sodišča skupno podjetje ni ocenilo kakovosti revizijskih poročil nacionalnih organov za financiranje, povezanih s stroški končanih projektov; prav tako ugotavlja, da po oceni revizijskih strategij treh nacionalnih organov za financiranje ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali naknadne revizije učinkovito delujejo, saj nacionalni organi za financiranje uporabljajo različne metodologije, zaradi česar skupno podjetje ni moglo izračunati niti ponderirane stopnje napake niti stopnje preostale napake; ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče zaradi te tehnične težave sicer ni dalo negativnega mnenja, je pa razumljivo, da zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij ni moglo potrditi, ne da bi izrazilo pridržek; ugotavlja tudi, da je skupno podjetje potrdilo, da je mogoče iz obširne ocene nacionalnih zavarovalnih sistemov sklepati, da lahko ti sistemi zagotavljajo primerno zaščito finančnih interesov njegovih članov;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking is of the opinion that national procedures provide reasonable assurance with regard to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions in spite of several reports from different Union institutions, including the discharge authority; calls on the Joint Undertaking, following the assessment of the procedures applied by the NFAs, to invite the NFAs to produce a written statement that the implementation of the national procedures provides a reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions;
ugotavlja, da nacionalni postopki po mnenju skupnega podjetja kljub več poročilom različnih institucij Unije, med njimi tudi organa za podelitev razrešnice, zagotavljajo primerno zavarovanje v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo povezanih transakcij; na osnovi ocene postopkov, ki jih uporabljajo nacionalni organi, skupno podjetje poziva, naj te organe prosi za pisno izjavo o tem, da izvajanje omenjenih postopkov daje zadostno zagotovilo za zakonitost in pravilnost transakcij;
Notes that the Court's report includes a qualified opinion which is based on the lack of information necessary to calculate either a weighted error rate or a residual error rate following the ex post audits by the NFAs; invites the Court to collect additional and necessary documents and information, which the Joint Undertaking is not empowered to require, from the national audit bodies or the national competent departments in accordance with the provisions of Article 287(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; moreover, invites the Court to use those additional documents and that additional information as an alternative way to justify its opinion and to report to the discharge authority on its assessment of those additional elements;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu dalo mnenje s pridržkom, ker ni imelo potrebnih informacij za izračun ponderirane stopnje napake oziroma stopnje preostale napake na osnovi naknadnih revizij nacionalnih organov financiranja; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v skladu z določbami člena 287(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije od državnih revizijskih organov ali pristojnih državnih služb pridobi potrebne dodatne dokumente in informacije, saj skupno podjetje za to nima pooblastil; poziva ga tudi, naj te dodatne dokumente in dodatne informacije uporabi kot nadomesten vir za obrazložitev svojega mnenja in organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o svoji oceni teh dodatnih elementov;
Notes that a substantial amending budget increasing commitment appropriations to EUR 158200000 was implemented by the governing board by the end of the financial year; invites the Joint Undertaking to provide the discharge authority with detailed information on the criteria followed to execute such significant financial decision;
ugotavlja, da je upravni odbor proti koncu proračunskega leta bistveno spremenil proračun in povečal sredstva za prevzem obveznosti na 158200000 EUR; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice priskrbi podrobne informacije o merilih, ki jih je uporabilo za izvršitev tako pomembne finančne odločitve;
Acknowledges the fact that the implementation rate for operational commitment appropriations was 99,7 %; notes, however, that the commitment appropriations were signed at a global level and, therefore, no corresponding grant agreements had been signed yet; considers that, in the absence of a clear separation between FP7 and Horizon 2020 implementation-related information, those indicators do not ensure a real evaluation of performance; calls on the Court to include in future reports information regarding the execution of the budget under of FP7 and separately under Horizon 2020; asks the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority about the state of play and any progress made in that regard;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je stopnja uporabe sredstev za prevzem upravnih obveznosti znašala 99,7 %; vendar ugotavlja, da so bila sredstva za prevzem obveznosti sprejeta na globalni ravni, kar pomeni, da ni bil podpisan še noben sporazum o dodelitvi sredstev; meni, da glede na odsotnost jasne razmejitve med informacijami o izvrševanju v zvezi s sedmim okvirnim programom in programom Obzorje 2020 ti kazalniki ne zagotavljajo dejanske ocene uspešnosti; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v prihodnja poročila vključi ločene informacije o izvrševanju proračuna v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa in programa Obzorje 2020; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice seznani s trenutnim stanjem in pri tem doseženim napredkom;
Notes that no clear separation was made between FP7 and Horizon 2020 implementation-related information due to the fact that no contracts relating to the implementation of Horizon 2020 were signed by the end of year 2014 and thus no payments have been made; asks the Court to provide separate information on budgetary implementation for FP7 and Horizon 2020 in its report for 2015; calls on the Joint Undertaking to provide that information in its Report on Budgetary and Financial Management for 2015;
ugotavlja, da informacije o izvajanju sedmega okvirnega programa in programa Obzorje 2020 niso bile jasno ločene, ker ob koncu leta 2014 ni bila podpisana nobena pogodba v zvezi z izvajanjem programa Obzorje 2020, zato tudi ni bilo plačil; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v poročilu za leto 2015 navede ločene informacije za sedmi okvirni program in program Obzorje 2020; poziva skupno podjetje, naj te informacije navede v poročilu o proračunskem upravljanju in finančnem poslovodenju za leto 2015;
Supports the Joint Undertaking's initiative to collaborate with smaller contributors and to extend the coverage of grants assessment in order to include 90 % of the grants awarded; calls on the Joint Undertaking to continue its assessment in order to approach the 100 % coverage of the total grants and inform the discharge authority on the advancements realised in the financial year of 2015 and 2016;
podpira pobudo skupnega podjetja, da sodeluje z manjšimi plačniki in razširi oceno sredstev na 90 % dodeljenih nepovratnih sredstev; skupno podjetje poziva, naj nadaljuje oceno, da bi se približali stoodstotni pokritosti vseh nepovratnih sredstev, in organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o napredku v proračunskih letih 2015 in 2016;
Points out that the Joint Undertaking took over the activities of ENIAC and Artemis in June 2014; notes that there is not enough clear information regarding the status of implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s projects (level of payments, payments plan for the next years);
poudarja, da je skupno podjetje junija 2014 prevzelo dejavnosti podjetij ENIAC in ARTEMIS; ugotavlja, da ni dovolj jasnih informacij o statusu izvajanja projektov skupnega podjetja (raven plačil, plačilni načrt za naslednja leta);
Welcomes the Joint Undertaking assessment of the level of in-kind contributions; notes, however, the lack of sufficient information to be able to ascertain the accomplishment of the members’ task with regards to FP7;
pozdravlja, da je skupno podjetje ocenilo raven prispevkov v naravi; vendar ugotavlja, da ni dovolj informacij, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče ugotoviti, koliko so bile izvršene naloge članov v zvezi s sedmim okvirnim programom;
Reiterates its demand to the Court to present a complete and appropriate financial assessment of rights and obligations of the Joint Undertaking for the period until the Joint Undertaking started its activity [3];
znova poziva Računsko sodišče, naj predloži popolno in ustrezno finančno oceno pravic in obveznosti skupnega podjetja za obdobje, dokler ne bo začelo skupno podjetje poslovati [3];
Takes note of the fact that the Commission's internal audit service performed a risk assessment of the Joint Undertaking; points out that four items have been rated as ‘high impact/high risk’;
ugotavlja, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo opravila oceno tveganja za skupno podjetje; poudarja, da so bile štiri točke ocenjene kot „zelo tvegane, z velikim učinkom“;
Requests that the Joint Undertaking provide the discharge authority with detailed information regarding risk management of indirect costs about concrete measures taken in the light of work with the Commission to find alternative mechanisms, as well as further possibilities to converge in accounting procedures in order to avoid the potential risk of double or triple book-keeping and reporting and the financial burden that this may cause;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice priskrbi podrobne informacije o obvladovanju tveganja za posredne stroške konkretnih ukrepov Komisije pri iskanju alternativnih mehanizmov, ter o nadaljnjih možnostih za zbliževanje računovodskih postopkov, da bi preprečili tveganje dvojnega ali trojnega računovodstva in poročanja ter finančno breme, ki bi ga to povzročilo;
Asks the Joint Undertaking to provide an update to the discharge authority on the adoption and implementation of the anti-fraud strategy;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice zagotovi zadnje informacije o sprejetju in izvajanju strategije o preprečevanju goljufij;
Acknowledges the fact that the Joint Undertaking will implement an auditing strategy aligned with the standard Horizon 2020 procedures; requests that the Joint Undertaking submit a report to the discharge authority detailing the criteria followed to execute such a strategy as well as the grounds for and an assessment of the effectiveness of such a strategy;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da bo skupno podjetje izvajalo revizijsko strategijo, ki bo usklajena s standardnimi postopki programa Obzorje 2020; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice predloži poročilo s podrobnostmi o merilih, ki jih bo upoštevalo pri izvajanju te strategije, o podlagi zanje, pa tudi oceno učinkovitosti te strategije;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking’s governing board has established an internal audit capability and has approved the relevant internal charter; notes, furthermore, that, according to the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014, two internal control standards have not been fully implemented yet and that some procedures are still to be updated;
ugotavlja, da je upravni odbor skupnega podjetja ustanovil skupino za notranjo revizijo in odobril ustrezno listino o notranji reviziji; ugotavlja tudi, da v skladu z zaključnim računom skupnega podjetja za proračunsko leto 2014 dva standarda notranje kontrole še nista bila v celoti izvedena in da je treba nekatere postopke še posodobiti;
Notes with satisfaction that a comprehensive policy to prevent conflicts of interest has been adopted by the Joint Undertaking; recalls, however, that the declarations of conflict of interest of the member of the governing board have not been made publicly available;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje sprejelo celovito politiko za preprečevanje konflikta interesov; vendar opozarja, da izjave o konfliktu interesov članov upravnega odbora še niso bile objavljene;
Welcomes the advancements realised by the Joint Undertaking in monitoring and reporting; notes, however, that more effort should be made to collaborate more closely with the Commission to meet the requirements of Horizon 2020 and to better contribute to the dissemination of FP7 results; notes, furthermore, that the Joint Undertaking should increase the systematic dissemination of the research results; requests that the Joint Undertaking take the necessary measures to comply with the above in the future and inform the discharge authority in that regard;
pozdravlja napredek skupnega podjetja pri spremljanju in poročanju; vendar ugotavlja, da bi si bilo treba za izpolnitev zahtev iz programa Obzorje 2020 in večji prispevek k razširjanju rezultatov sedmega okvirnega programa bolj prizadevati za tesnejše sodelovanje s Komisijo; poleg tega ugotavlja, da bi moralo skupno podjetje okrepiti sistematično razširjanje rezultatov raziskav; poziva skupno podjetje, naj ustrezno ukrepa, da bi v prihodnje izpolnilo zgoraj navedeno, in o tem obvesti organ za podelitev razrešnice,
Welcomes the publication by the Joint Undertaking of the Report on the Socio-Economic Impact of ECSEL Joint Undertaking activities;
pozdravlja, da je skupno podjetje objavilo poročilo o socialno-ekonomskem vplivu dejavnosti skupnega podjetja ECSEL;
Recalls that the discharge authority has requested the Court to draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes [4].
želi spomniti, da je organ za podelitev razrešnice zahteval, naj Računsko sodišče pripravi posebno poročilo o zmožnosti skupnih podjetij, da v povezavi z zasebnimi partnerji zagotovijo dodano vrednost in učinkovito izvajanje raziskovalnih, razvojno-tehnoloških in demonstracijskih programov Unije [4].
Council Regulation (EU) No 561/2014 of 6 May 2014 establishing the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (OJ L 169, 7.6.2014, p.
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 561/2014 z dne 6. maja 2014 o ustanovitvi Skupnega podjetja ECSEL (UL L 169, 7.6.2014, str.
Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) (OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.
Sklep 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o Sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str.
Resolution (EU) 2016/1589 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU) 2016/1589
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja za gorivne celice in vodik za proračunsko leto 2014
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja za gorivne celice in vodik za proračunsko leto 2014,
A. whereas the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (‘FCH’) was set up in May 2008 as a public-private partnership by Council Regulation (EC) No 521/2008 [1] for the period until 31 December 2017 to focus on developing market applications and thereby facilitating additional industrial efforts towards a rapid deployment of fuel cells and hydrogen technologies;
A. ker je bilo Skupno podjetje za gorivne celice in vodik (v nadaljevanju: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno maja 2008 z Uredbo (ES) št. 521/2008 [1] kot javno-zasebno partnerstvo za obdobje do 31. decembra 2017, da bi se osredotočili na razvoj tržnih aplikacij ter tako pospešili dodatna gospodarska prizadevanja za hitro uveljavljanje tehnologij gorivnih celic in vodika;
B. whereas Regulation (EC) No 521/2008 was amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 559/2014 [2];
B. ker je bila Uredba (ES) št. 521/2008 spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 559/2014 [2];
C. whereas Regulation (EU) No 559/2014 established the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (‘FCH2’) in May 2014 to replace and succeed FCH for the period until 31 December 2024;
C. ker je bilo z Uredbo (EU) št. 559/2014 maja 2014 ustanovljeno Skupno podjetje za gorivne celice in vodik 2 (v nadaljevanju: skupno podjetje 2), ki naj bi nadomestilo skupno podjetje za obdobje do 31. decembra 2024;
D. whereas the members of FCH are the Union, represented by the Commission, the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Technology Initiative Industry Grouping (‘FCH Industry Grouping’), and the Research Grouping N.ERGHY (‘N.ERGHY’);
D. ker so člani skupnega podjetja Unija, ki jo zastopa Komisija, Industrijsko združenje za skupne tehnološke pobude za gorivne celice in vodik (v nadaljevanju: industrijsko združenje) ter raziskovalna skupnost N.ERGHY (v nadaljevanju: skupnost N.ERGHY);
E. whereas the members of FCH2 are the Union, represented by the Commission, the New Energy World Industry Grouping (‘NEW Industry Grouping’) and the New European Research Grouping on Fuel Cells and Hydrogen AISBL (‘Research Grouping’);
E. ker so člani skupnega podjetja 2 Unija, ki jo zastopa Komisija, industrijsko združenje New Energy World Industry Grouping (v nadaljevanju: novo industrijsko združenje) in raziskovalno združenje New European Research Grouping on Fuel Cells and Hydrogen AISBL (v nadaljevanju: raziskovalno združenje);