natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
how the Commission’s different support functions and services could be made more reactive in order to respond quicker to the agencies’ needs;
kako bi se lahko različne podporne funkcije in storitve Komisije hitreje odzvale na potrebe agencij;
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the agencies subject to this discharge procedure, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors.
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje agencijam, ki so vključene v postopek podelitve razrešnic, Svetu, Komisiji in Evropskemu računskemu sodišču.
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0495.
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0495.
See the arguments developed in the Study on the Agencies’ discharge by the Budgetary Support Unit of the European Parliament, December 2006.
Glej dokaze v študiji o razrešnicah agencijam, ki jo je pripravila enota za proračunsko podporo Evropskega parlamenta decembra 2006.
on the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (14409/2011 – C7-0252/2011 – 2011/0805(NLE))
o pristopu Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji (14409/2011 – C7-0252/2011 – 2011/0805(NLE))
(Consent)
(Odobritev)
having regard to the application by the Republic of Croatia to become a member of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju prošnje Republike Hrvaške za članstvo v Evropski uniji,
having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union (14409/2011 – C7-0252/2011),
ob upoštevanju prošnje za odobritev, ki jo je Svet predložil v skladu s členom 49 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (14409/2011 – C7-0252/2011),
having regard to the opinion of the Commission (COM(2011) 667),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije (KOM(2011)0667),
having regard to the draft Treaty concerning the Accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union, the Protocol and the Final Act,
ob upoštevanju osnutka Pogodbe o pristopu Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji, Protokola in Sklepne listine,
having regard to Rules 74c and 81 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju členov 74c in 81 Poslovnika,
having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0390/2011),
ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za zunanje zadeve (A7-0390/2011),
A. whereas the conditions for the admission of the applicant country and the modifications which its accession entails are set out in the draft Treaty concerning the Accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union, and whereas Parliament should be consulted on any substantial modifications to the draft Treaty,
A. ker so pogoji za sprejem države prosilke in spremembe, ki jih pristop pomeni, opredeljeni v osnutku Pogodbe o pristopu Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji in ker bi moral biti Parlament zaprošen za mnenje o vseh vsebinskih spremembah osnutka pogodbe,
B. whereas the Commission must monitor further preparations for accession with rigour and objectivity and help the Croatian authorities to fulfil their commitments and obligations as entered into in the negotiations; whereas the Commission must keep Parliament regularly informed of the extent to which the Croatian authorities honour their commitments in order to fully assume their membership obligations upon accession on 1 July 2013,
B. ker mora Komisija natančno in objektivno spremljati nadaljnje priprave na pristop in hrvaškim oblastem pomagati pri izpolnjevanju zavez in obveznosti, ki so jih sprejele med pogajanji; ker mora Komisija Parlament redno obveščati o tem, v kolikšni meri hrvaške oblasti spoštujejo svoje zaveze, da bodo lahko v celoti prevzele obveznosti članstva po pristopu 1. julija 2013,
Consents to the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia;
odobri pristop Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji;
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Republic of Croatia.
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic in Republike Hrvaške.
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agencies for the financial year 2010: performance, financial management and control of European Union Agencies
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna agencij Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010: uspešnost finančno poslovodenje in nadzor agencij Evropske unije
having regard to the report of 14 November 2011 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the follow-up to the discharge for the 2009 financial year (COM(2011) 736) and the accompanying Commission Staff Working Documents (SEC(2011) 1350 and SEC(2011) 1351),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi sklepov o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2009 z dne 14. novembra 2011 (COM(2011) 736) in delovnih dokumentov služb Komisije, priloženih temu poročilu (SEC(2011) 1350 in SEC(2011) 1351),
having regard to the Commission communication of 11 March 2008 entitled ‘European Agencies – the way forward’ (COM(2008) 135),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 11. marca 2008 z naslovom „Evropske agencije – pot naprej“ (COM(2008) 135),
having regard to its resolution of 10 May 2011 on the 2009 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU Agencies [1],having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2],having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [3], and in particular Article 96 thereof,having regard to Special Report No 5/2008 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The European Union’s Agencies: getting results’,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. maja 2011 o razrešnici za leto 2010: uspešnost, finančno poslovodenje in nadzor agencij EU [1],ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2],ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [3], zlasti člena 96 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča št. 5/2008 z naslovom „Agencije Evropske unije: doseganje rezultatov“,
having regard to the specific annual reports [4] of the Court of Auditors on the annual accounts of the decentralised Agencies for the financial year 2010,having regard to its study entitled ‘Opportunity and feasibility of establishing common support services for EU Agencies’ issued on 7 April 2009,
ob upoštevanju specifičnih letnih poročil [4] Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih decentraliziranih agencij za proračunsko leto 2010,ob upoštevanju svoje študije z naslovom „Priložnosti in možnosti za ustanovitev skupne službe za podporo agencij EU“, ki je bila izdana 7. aprila 2009,
having regard to its resolution of 15 September 2011 on the EU’s efforts to combat corruption [5], its declaration of 18 May 2010 on the Union’s efforts in combating corruption [6], and to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on Fighting corruption in the EU (COM(2011) 308),having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. septembra 2011 o prizadevanjih EU za boj proti korupciji [5], svoje izjave z dne 18. maja 2010 o prizadevanjih Unije za boj proti korupciji [6] in sporočila komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru o boju proti korupciji v EU (COM(2011) 308),ob upoštevanju člena 77 in Priloge VI Poslovnika,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0103/2012),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve (A7-0103/2012),
A. whereas this resolution contains, for each body within the meaning of Article 185 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, the horizontal observations accompanying the discharge decisions in accordance with Article 96 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 and Article 3 of Annex VI to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure,
A. ker ta resolucija vsebuje za vsak organ iz člena 185 Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 horizontalne ugotovitve, ki spremljajo sklepe o razrešnicah v skladu s členom 96 Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 in členom 3 Priloge VI k Poslovniku Evropskega parlamenta;
B. whereas there has been a substantial increase in the number of Agencies over the last decade, from 3 in 2000 to 24 in 2010,
B. ker se je število agencij v zadnjem desetletju zelo povečalo, s treh leta 2000 na 24 leta 2010;
C. whereas the decisions on the establishment and allocation of Agencies taken by the Council during recent years, are responsible for high expenditures and ineffectiveness of the functioning of the Agencies concerned, as they are not based on efficiency considerations, inter alia, leading to remote and high cost locations,
C. ker so odločitve o ustanovitvi in razporeditvi agencij, ki jih je v preteklih letih sprejel Svet, odgovorne za visoke stroške in neučinkovito delovanje zadevnih agencij, saj pri sprejemanju odločitev ni bil upoštevan dejavnik učinkovitosti, to pa med drugim povzroča, da delujejo na oddaljenih in dragih lokacijah;
D. whereas the budget of the decentralised Agencies increased substantially between 2007 and 2010 from EUR 1055000000 (for 21 Agencies) to EUR 1658000000 (for 24 Agencies),
D. ker se je proračun decentraliziranih agencij med letoma 2007 in 2010 močno povečal, in sicer z 1055000000 EUR (za 21 agencij) na 1658000000 EUR (za 24 agencij);
E. whereas the Union contributions to the decentralised Agencies for the financial year 2010 amounted to over EUR 620000000,
E. ker je Unija v proračunskem letu 2010 za decentralizirane agencije prispevala več kot 620000000 EUR;
F. whereas, following the adoption of the above-mentioned Commission communication of 11 March 2008, Parliament, the Council and the Commission relaunched the project of defining a common framework for the Agencies and, in 2009, set up an Interinstitutional Working Group on Agencies,
F. ker so Parlament, Svet in Komisija po sprejetju omenjenega sporočila Komisije z dne 11. marca 2008 ponovno oživili projekt opredelitve skupnega okvira za agencije, leta 2009 pa ustanovili medinstitucionalno delovno skupino za agencije;
G. whereas this Interinstitutional Working Group met for the seventh time at political level on 13 December 2011 and whereas the following points were discussed: the criteria for setting up new Agencies, the choice of the Agencies’ seat and seat agreement, the composition of management boards, the appointment procedure for directors, the evaluation and performance, the multiannual programme, and the administrative support,
G. ker se je medinstitucionalna delovna skupina dne 13. decembra 2011 že sedmič sestala na politični ravni in razpravljala o teh točkah: merila za ustanovitev novih agencij, izbira njihovega sedeža in sporazum o tem, sestava upravnega odbora, postopek imenovanja direktorja, ocena in uspešnost, večletni program in strokovno-tehnična pomoč;
H. whereas the Court of Auditors’ Special Report on cost benchmarking of the European Union Agencies which was planned to be issued before the end of 2011, whereas a letter received from the Court of Auditors on 15 February 2012 provided a synthesis document with data extracts covering 2008 to 2010 on the Agencies’ governance costs, financial management and operational efficiency, whereas the Court of Auditors informed the discharge authority, by letter of 18 April 2012, that it is not in their intention to issue the Special Report on cost benchmarking of the European Union Agencies,
H. ker naj bi bilo posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča o primerjalni analizi stroškov agencij Evropske unije izdano še pred koncem leta 2011 in ker je Računsko sodišče 15. februarja 2012 poslalo pismo z zbirnim dokumentom in izvlečki podatki o stroških upravljanja, finančnem poslovodenju in operativni učinkovitosti agencij za obdobje 2008–2010, ker je Računsko sodišče 18. aprila 2012 pisno obvestilo organ za podelitev razrešnice, da ne namerava izdati posebnega poročila o primerjalni analizi stroškov agencij Evropske unije;
I. COMMON CHALLENGES ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
I. SKUPNI IZZIVI GLEDE FINANČNEGA POSLOVODENJA
Management of budgetary resources (including carry-overs and cancellations)
Upravljanje proračunskih sredstev (vključno s prenosom in razveljavitvijo)
Calls on the Commission to provide the discharge authority annually with consolidated information on the total annual funding per Agency made from the general budget of the Union; underlines that the document shall include the following information:
poziva Komisijo, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice vsako leto zagotovi konsolidirane podatke o skupnem letnem financiranju posamezne agencije iz splošnega proračuna Unije; poudarja, da bi moral dokument vsebovati te podatke:
the initial contribution of the Union entered in the budget for the Agency,
prvotni prispevek Unije, ki je bil vnesen v proračun za agencijo,
the amount of funds coming from the recovery of surplus,
o znesku sredstev, pridobljenim z izterjavo presežka,
the overall contribution of the Union for the Agency,
splošni prispevek Unije za agencijo,
the amount of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)’s contribution,
znesek prispevka Evropskega združenja za prosto trgovino (EFTA);
calls on the Commission to provide the discharge authority annually with consolidated information on, if applicable, the level of income generated by the Agencies, and the level of contributions made by Member States and third parties;
poziva Komisijo, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice vsako leto zagotovi konsolidirane podatke o stopnji prihodkov, ki so jih ustvarile agencije same, in stopnji prispevkov držav članic in tretjih strani;
Calls on the Commission to provide the information listed in paragraph 1 for the financial year 2010, in a comparable and transparent manner, as well as for the previous financial years to enable Parliament and the public to compare the Union’s contribution to each Agency over time; this will also ensure clarity, transparency and public control over the spending of the Union’s money;
poziva Komisijo, naj podatke iz prvega odstavka na primerljiv in pregleden način predloži za proračunsko leto 2010 ter za predhodna proračunska leta, da bosta lahko Parlament in javnost prispevek Unije za posamezno agencijo primerjala skozi čas; to bo omogočilo tudi jasnost, preglednost in javni nadzor nad porabo denarja Unije;
Urges the Commission to stop the increases in the Agencies’ budgets, to even consider reducing the Union contribution to their budgets; also urges the Agencies to reduce their running costs and overheads, inter alia, by merging Agencies with similar or overlapping tasks or multiple sites of location, and establishing mechanisms to show the clear use and accountability of each EUR and to make substantial savings of Union funds;
poziva Komisijo, naj preneha povečevati proračune agencij in razmisli celo o tem, da bi zmanjšala prispevek Unije zanje; poziva tudi agencije, naj zmanjšajo tekoče in splošne stroške, med drugim z združitvijo agencij, katerih naloge so si podobne oziroma se prekrivajo ali ki delujejo na več krajih dela, vzpostavijo mehanizme, s katerimi bodo lahko prikazale uporabo in njeno upravičenost za vsak euro, ter bistveno povečajo prihranke sredstev Unije;
Demands that all Agencies justify, systematically, amending budgets, transfers and carry-overs in their report on the final annual accounts and annual report on budgetary and financial management;
zahteva, da agencije spremembe proračuna, prerazporeditve in prenose dosledno utemeljijo v svojih poročilih o končnih letnih računovodskih izkazih ter letnih poročilih o upravljanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju;
Notes that some Agencies have difficulties in spending their budgets in a timely manner and that funds are committed against projects unrelated to the financial year; is concerned by the fact that significant amounts of budget are allocated in the end of the financial year; considers this as a possible sign that Union funds are, in some cases, used unnecessarily; calls on the Court of Auditors and especially the Agencies themselves to provide additional information and justification in the cases of Cedefop, CPVO, EFSA, EMSA, ENISA, ERA, Eurojust and FRA that have spent more than 25 % of their budgets in the final two months of 2010, as well as on the cases of CEPOL, CPVO, Frontex and again EMSA that exhibit continuously high percentages of carry-forwards which have to be cancelled;
ugotavlja, da imajo nekatere agencije težave pri pravočasnem porabljanju proračuna in da se njihova sredstva namenjajo za projekte, ki niso povezani s tekočim proračunskim letom; je zaskrbljen zaradi dejstva, da se precejšnji proračunski zneski dodelijo ob koncu proračunskega leta; meni, da je to lahko znamenje, da se v nekaterih primerih tratijo sredstva Unije; poziva Računsko sodišče, predvsem pa agencije same, naj posredujejo dodatne podatke in utemeljitve za Cedefop, CPVO, EFSA, EMSA, ENISA, ERA, Eurojust in FRA, ki so več kot 25 % svojega proračuna porabile v zadnjih dveh mesecih leta 2010, ter za CEPOL, CPVO, Frontex in še enkrat EMSA, ki vedno znova prikazujejo visok delež prenosov, ki jih je treba preklicati;
Is concerned by the fact that in the cases of ECHA, ENISA, ERA, Eurofound, FRA, CEPOL, EU-OSHA, EFSA, Eurojust, ECDC, Frontex, OHIM the ratio of accruals versus carry-forwards in 2010 was lower than 50 %; calls on additional information and justification of the Agencies mentioned above since this indicates that over half of their carry-forwards is related to activities undertaken in the next year and this would, if unjustified, breach the principle of annuality;
je zaskrbljen zaradi dejstva, da je bilo za ECHA, ENISA, ERA, Eurofound, FRA, CEPOL, EU-OSHA, EFSA, Eurojust, ECDC, Frontex in OHIM razmerje med vnaprej vračunanimi obveznostmi in prenosi v letu 2010 nižje od 50 %; zahteva, da zgoraj navedene agencije posredujejo dodatne podatke in utemeljitve, saj razmerje kaže, da se več kot polovica prenosov nanaša na dejavnosti v naslednjem letu, to pa bi, če ne bi bilo utemeljeno, prekršilo načelo enoletnosti;
Notes a large volume of carry-overs and cancellations of operational appropriations by several Agencies in the financial year 2010 which the Court of Auditors did not consider to be significant or unjustified in its reports on annual accounts for the financial year 2010; would therefore welcome information from the Court on the criteria used for judging what constitute significant or unjustified carry-overs;
ugotavlja, da je bil obseg prenosov in razveljavitev operativnih sredstev v več agencijah v proračunskem letu 2010 zelo velik, vendar Računsko sodišče v poročilih o letnih računovodskih izkazih za proračunsko leto 2010 ni ocenilo, da je pomemben ali neupravičen; zato Računsko sodišče poziva, naj pojasni merila, ki jih je uporabilo za presojanje o tem, kaj so pomembni oziroma neupravičeni prenosi;
Points out that the high level of carry-overs and cancellations is generally indicative of the inability of an Agency to manage a large increase in its budget; demands that the absorptive capacity and the time needed to carry out additional tasks should play a larger role in budgetary decisions; urges that the annual budget for the Agency concerned be reduced if no structural action is taken to address this issue;
poudarja, da visoka raven prenosov in razveljavitev ponavadi kaže na to, da agencija ni znala upravljati velikega povečanja proračuna; zahteva, da se sposobnosti črpanja in času, ki je potreben za izvajanje dodatnih nalog, pripiše večja vloga pri sprejemanju proračunskih odločitev; poziva, da se letni proračun agencij, ki ne bodo sprejele strukturnih ukrepov, da bi rešile to težavo, zmanjša;
Urges the Agencies to improve their management of commitments as well as their internal planning and general revenue forecasting in order to optimise their carry-over and cancellation rates as well as their spending; reminds the Agencies that they need to refine their programming and monitoring system and initiate contracting earlier in the calendar year to reduce the need to carry over appropriations; calls in addition on the Commission to provide guidance and keep strict level of supervision in this respect;
poziva agencije, naj izboljšajo upravljanje obveznosti, pa tudi interno načrtovanje in splošne napovedi za prihodke, da bi optimizirale stopnje prenosa in razveljavitev ter porabo; opozarja agencije, da morajo izpopolniti sisteme načrtovanja in spremljanja ter začeti sklepati pogodbe bolj zgodaj v koledarskem letu, da bi zmanjšale potrebo po prenosu sredstev; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi ustrezne smernice v zvezi s tem in strog nadzor;
Acknowledges, however, that due to their financial set-ups, some Agencies, such as EMA, generally end up with a high level of carry-overs at the end of each financial year; calls on these Agencies to establish a genuine mechanism enabling them to establish, in due time, their estimated level of carry-overs; is of the opinion that such a mechanism is essential to evaluate whether the level of carry-overs at year-end is justified and to evaluate the Agencies’ ability to manage their budget properly;
priznava pa, da imajo nekatere agencije, na primer EMA, zaradi svoje finančne strukture praviloma visoko stopnjo prenosov ob koncu vsakega proračunskega leta; poziva te agencije, naj oblikujejo mehanizem, ki bo omogočal, da bodo pravočasno opredelile predvideno stopnjo prenosa; meni, da je tak mehanizem nepogrešljiv pri ocenjevanju, ali je stopnja prenosa ob koncu leta upravičena in ali je agencija sposobna ustrezno upravljati svoj proračun;
Acknowledges the fact that some Agencies in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice are operational ones and that the implementation of their budget may depend on external factors;
priznava dejstvo, da so nekatere agencije na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice operativne in da je izvrševanje njihovih proračunov lahko odvisno od zunanjih dejavnikov;
Welcomes Cedefop’s intention to further reduce its carry-overs by monitoring through standardised templates of budget execution (commitments, payments) and procurement progress; considers this measure to be a practice to be followed by the other Agencies;
pozdravlja namen Evropskega centra za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja (Cedefop), da nadalje zmanjša prenose, tako da s standardiziranimi predlogami spremlja izvrševanje proračuna (obveznosti, plačil) in napredek pri javnih naročilih; meni, da bi morale temu kot zgledu slediti tudi druge agencije;
Points out that before any outsourcing or mergers, a thorough cost-benefit analysis is necessary in order to assess whether administrative costs can be reduced in, for example, the fields of budget planning and personnel management; refers in this respect to the study ‘Opportunity and Feasibility of Establishing Common Support Services for EU Agencies’ which was carried out by Parliament as early as 2009;
poudarja, da je treba pred morebitnim zunanjim izvajanjem ali združitvami opraviti temeljito analizo stroškov in koristi, da se ugotovi, ali bi bilo mogoče zmanjšati upravne stroške, na primer na področju načrtovanja proračuna in kadrovskega upravljanja; v zvezi s tem se sklicuje na raziskavo o možnosti in izvedljivosti ustanovitve skupnih služb za agencije EU, ki jo je Parlament opravil že leta 2009;