natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although the municipality did not introduce user fees for access to the fitness centre until 1996, since the 1970s it required such a fee from the users of parts of the KLC, in particular the swimming pool.
Čeprav občina vstopnin za dostop do fitnes centra ni uvedla vse do leta 1996, pa je takšne vstopnine od uporabnikov zahtevala že od 1970-ih let za dostop do delov centra KLC, zlasti do bazena.
On this basis, the Authority notes that the system of financing the KLC as such has not been changed.
Na tej podlagi Nadzorni organ ugotavlja, da se sistem financiranja centra KLC kot tak ni spremenil.
The expansion of the fitness centre in 1997-1999 was of a smaller scale than what the information initially provided to the Authority indicated.
Razširitev fitnes centra v letih 1997–1999 je bila manj obsežna, kot je Nadzorni organ lahko sklepal iz prvotno predloženih informacij.
The Norwegian authorities have explained in the formal investigation that the municipality took a loan for NOK 5,8 million (instead of NOK 10 million) which was not used for the renovation of the fitness centre.
Norveški organi so v formalni preiskavi pojasnili, da je občina najela posojilo v višini 5,8 milijona NOK (namesto 10 milijonov NOK), ki pa ga ni porabila za prenovo fitnes centra.
On the contrary, a relatively modest expansion and re-furnishing of the fitness centre at a total cost of approximately NOK 870000 that was carried out during this time was financed by the revenue stemming from fees levied on the users.
Nasprotno, relativno skromna razširitev in prenova opreme fitnes centra v skupni vrednosti okoli 870000 NOK, ki sta bili v tem času opravljeni, sta se financirali iz prihodkov od vstopnin, zaračunanih uporabnikom.
Although more substantial in scope, the 2006-2007 expansion only ensured that the service on offer would be on par with comparable fitness centres.
Čeprav je bila razširitev v letih 2006–2007 obsežnejša, pa je bila izvedena zgolj zato, da bi se zagotovila enakovrednost ponujenih storitev s storitvami primerljivih fitnes centov.
Consequently, the type of activity carried out by the fitness centre, both before and after the expansions, remains the same and it is just adjusted to meet the evolution in the sector and the demands of the users.
Zato je vrsta dejavnosti, ki jih ponuja fitnes center, pred in po razširitvi ostala enaka ter je bila le prilagojena razvoju v panogi in zahtevam uporabnikov.
With the fitness centre at the KLC, the municipality has been active on the fitness centre market both before and after the entry into force of the EEA Agreement; it has occasionally expanded the fitness studio only to be able to provide a service to the population in line with what can be expected from a fitness centre.
Občina je prek fitnes centra v centru KLC nastopala na trgu fitnes centrov pred in po začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma EGP; občasno je fitnes studio razširila, da bi lahko uporabnikom zagotovila storitve, kakršne je mogoče pričakovati od fitnes centra.
The system of financing (users fees and allocations from the municipal budget) and the aim pursued (providing fitness centre facilities to the population) have not changed [26].
Sistem financiranja (vstopnine za uporabnike in dodelitve iz občinskega proračuna) ter zastavljeni namen (zagotavljanje prostorov fitnes centra prebivalstvu) se nista spremenila [26].
Moreover, these expansions have not enabled the municipality to enter new markets.
Poleg tega te razširitve občini niso omogočile, da bi vstopila na nove trge.
In that respect, the case at hand differs from the Commission Decision on the BBC Digital Curriculum [27].
V tem pogledu se ta zadeva razlikuje od Odločbe Komisije o storitvi BBC Digital Curriculum [27].
That case concerned changes made to the existing system of aid benefiting the British public broadcaster, the BBC.
V navedeni zadevi so bile spremembe, uvedene v obstoječi sistem pomoči v korist britanski javni radioteleviziji, BBC.
In that case, the Commission found that changes made to the existing aid scheme involved new aid as they enabled the broadcaster to carry out activities that lacked a 'close association' to the existing scheme, and enabled the BBC to enter developed markets where the commercial players had little or no exposure to the BBC as a competitor [28].On the basis of the above, the Authority concludes that the financing of the fitness centre at the Kippermoen Leisure Centre with resources from the Municipality of Vefsn, in so far as it involves State aid, constitutes a system of existing aid.
Komisija je v navedeni zadevi ugotovila, da so spremembe obstoječe sheme pomoči pomenile novo pomoč, saj so radiotelevizijski postaji omogočile, da je opravljala dejavnosti, ki niso bile „tesno povezane“ z obstoječo shemo, ter so postaji BBC omogočile, da je vstopila na razvite trge, na katerih so bili komercialni akterji le malo izpostavljeni postaji BBC kot konkurentu, ali pa sploh ne [28]. Na podlagi navedenega Nadzorni organ ugotavlja, da financiranje fitnes centra v rekreacijskem centru Kippermoen s sredstvi občine Vefsn, kolikor vključuje državno pomoč, pomeni sistem obstoječe pomoči.
A separate procedure for existing aid is laid down in Article 1(1) of Part I of Protocol 3.
Ločen postopek za obravnavo obstoječe pomoči je določen v členu 1(1) dela I Protokola 3.
Pursuant to that provision, the Authority shall, in cooperation with the EFTA States, keep under constant review all systems of aid existing in those States.
Na podlagi teh določb Nadzorni organ v sodelovanju z državami Efte nenehno pregleduje vse sisteme pomoči, ki obstajajo v zadevnih državah.
It shall propose to the latter any appropriate measures required by the progressive development or by the functioning of the EEA Agreement.
Slednjim predlaga ustrezne ukrepe, ki so potrebni za postopen razvoj ali delovanje Sporazuma EGP.
The funding from the County Municipality of Nordland
Financiranje, ki ga je zagotovila okrožna občina Nordland
As noted above, the Norwegian authorities have clarified that the fitness centre at the KLC has not received funding from the county municipality of Nordland.
Kakor je bilo ugotovljeno zgoraj, so Norveški organi pojasnili, da se fitnes center v centru KLC ni financiral iz sredstev okrožne občine Nordland.
Accordingly, there was no transfer of State resources from the county municipality of Nordland, which is the first of the four cumulative criteria to be fulfilled for a measure to constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.
Skladno s tem niso bila prenesena nobena državna sredstva iz okrožne občine Nordland, kar je prvo od štirih kumulativnih meril, ki morajo biti izpolnjena, da ukrep pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP.
On the basis of the information newly provided by the Norwegian authorities, the Authority concludes that the fitness centre at the KLC, within this context, has not received any State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement in the form of advantages stemming from state resources (the county municipality of Nordland).
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih norveški organi predložili naknadno, Nadzorni organ ugotavlja, da fitnes center v centru KLC v tem okviru ni prejel nobene državne pomoči v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP v obliki prednosti, ki izhaja iz državnih sredstev (okrožna občina Nordland).
According to the new information provided by the Norwegian authorities, the county municipality of Nordland did not grant economic advantages to the fitness centre at the KLC in the period covered by the current formal investigation procedure.
Po novih informacijah, ki so jih predložili norveški organi, okrožna občina Nordland v obdobju, ki ga zajema trenutni formalni postopek preiskave, ni dodelila gospodarske prednosti fitnes centru v centru KLC.
On this basis the Authority concludes that the fitness centre at the KLC has not received State aid stemming from the county municipality of Nordland in the relevant period.
Na tej podlagi Nadzorni organ ugotavlja, da fitnes center v centru KLC v relevantnem obdobju ni prejel državne pomoči, ki izhaja iz okrožne občine Nordland.
The Authority has furthermore concluded that, in so far as resources stemming from the municipality of Vefsn have contributed to the financing of the fitness centre at the KLC and these resources constitute State aid, such aid has been granted under a system of existing aid.
Poleg tega je Nadzorni organ ugotovil, da, kolikor so sredstva, ki izhajajo iz občine Vefsn, prispevala k financiranju fitnes centra v centru KLC in ta sredstva pomenijo državno pomoč, je bila tovrstna pomoč dodeljena v okviru sistema obstoječe pomoči.
On the basis of the above assessment, the Authority has decided to close the formal investigation procedure and will initiate the procedure for the review of existing aid provided for in Article 1(1) and (2) of Part I of Protocol 3,
Na podlagi zgornje ocene se je Nadzorni organ odločil, da konča formalni postopek preiskave in začne postopek za pregled obstoječe pomoči, ki je določen v členu 1(1) in (2) dela I Protokola 3 –
The formal investigation procedure with regard to the financing of the fitness centre at the Kippermoen Leisure Centre with funds stemming from the county municipality of Nordland during the period under assessment is without object and therefore closed.
Formalni postopek preiskave glede financiranja fitnes centra v rekreacijskem centru Kippermoen s sredstvi, ki izhajajo iz okrožne občine Nordland v ocenjevanem obdobju, je brezpredmeten in zato končan.
The formal investigation procedure with regard to the financing of the fitness centre at the Kippermoen Leisure Centre with funds stemming from the municipality of Vefsn is closed.
Formalni postopek preiskave glede financiranja fitnes centra v rekreacijskem centru Kippermoen s sredstvi, ki izhajajo iz občine Vefsn, je končan.
OJ C 184, 8.7.2010, p. 5 and EEA Supplement No 35, 8.7.2010, p. 1.
UL C 184, 8.7.2010, str. 5, in Dopolnilo EGP k UL št. 35, 8.7.2010, str. 1.
Formerly the Norwegian Association for Fitness Centres (NAFC) (Norsk Treningssenterforbund).
Prej norveška zveza za fitnes centre (Norsk Treningssenterforbund).
Chapter I.2.2 of the Decision.
Poglavje I.2.2 Odločbe.
See e-mail from the Norwegian authorities dated 28.3.2011 (Event No 592463).
Glej elektronsko sporočilo norveških organov z dne 28. marca 2011 (ev. št. 592463).
Chapters I.2.2 and II.1.3 of Decision No 537/09/COL.
Poglavji I.2.2 in II.1.3 Odločbe št. 537/09/COL.
See letter from the Norwegian authorities dated 23.2.2010 (Event No 547864), p. 6.
Glej dopis norveških organov z dne 23. februarja 2010 (ev. št. 547864), str. 6.
Ibid. pp. 2, 6 and 8.
Prav tam, str. 2, 6 in 8.
Ibid. pp. 7-9.
Prav tam, str. 7–9.
See Decisions 10/05 and 152/05 of the local council of Vefsn Municipality, Annex 2 to Event No 547864.
Glej odločitvi št. 10/05 in 152/05 lokalnega sveta občine Vefsn, priloga 2 k ev. št. 547864.
See letter from the Norwegian authorities dated 23.2.2010 (Event No 547864), p. 10.
Glej dopis norveških organov z dne 23. februarja 2010 (ev. št. 547864), str. 10.
See letter from the Norwegian authorities dated 9.9.2009 (Event No 529846), pp. 2-4.
Glej dopis norveških organov z dne 9. septembra 2009 (ev. št. 529846), str. 2–4.
See letter from the Norwegian authorities dated 23.2.2010 (Event No 547864), p. 12.
Glej dopis norveških organov z dne 23. februarja 2010 (ev. št. 547864), str. 12.
Chapter II.1.1 of Decision No 537/09/COL.
Poglavje II.1.1 Odločbe št. 537/09/COL.
See letter from the Norwegian authorities dated 23.2.2010 (Event No 547864), pp. 19-20.
Glej dopis norveških organov z dne 23. februarja 2010 (ev. št. 547864), str. 19–20.
See letter from the Authority dated 9.11.2010 (Event No 576711).
Glej dopis Nadzornega organa z dne 9. novembra 2010 (ev. št. 576711).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to de minimis aid (OJ L 379, 28.12.2006, p. 5), incorporated into the EEA Agreement in paragraph 1ea of Annex 15 to the Agreement.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1998/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe pri pomoči de minimis (UL L 379, 28.12.2006, str. 5), vključena v Sporazum EGP v odstavku 1ea Priloge 15 k Sporazumu.
The Guidelines are available online at: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=15125&1=1
Smernice so na voljo na spletni strani: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=15125&1=1.
See letter from the Norwegian authorities dated 27.1.2009 (Event No 506341), p. 40.
Glej dopis norveških organov z dne 27. januarja 2009 (ev. št. 506341), str. 40.
Pursuant to Article 1(b)(i) of Part II of Protocol 3, existing aid is: 'all aid which existed prior to the entry into force of the EEA Agreement in the respective EEA States, that is to say, aid schemes and individual aid which were put into effect before, and are still applicable after, the entry into force of the EEA Agreement.'
V skladu s členom 1(b)(i) dela II Protokola 3, obstoječa pomoč vključuje „… vso pomoč, ki je v zadevnih državah EGP obstajala pred začetkom veljavnosti Sporazuma EGP, to je sheme pomoči in individualno pomoč, ki so začeli veljati pred začetkom veljavnosti Sporazuma EGP in se uporabljajo tudi po začetku njegove veljavnosti.“
Chapter II.1.3 of Decision No 537/09/COL.
Poglavje II.1.3 Odločbe št. 537/09/COL.
Case C-400/99 Italy v Commission [2005] ECR I-3657.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 10. maja 2005 v zadevi C-400/99, Italija proti Komisiji, ZOdl., str. I-3657.
Ibid. paragraphs 47 and 54-55.
Prav tam, točke 47 in 54–55.
Case T-190/00 Regione Siciliana v Commission [2003] ECR II-5015, paragraph 48.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 27. novembra 2003 v zadevi T-190/00, Regione Siciliana proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. II-5015, točka 48.
Case C-312/90 Spain v Commission [1992] ECR I-4117, paragraphs 14-17 and Case C-47/91 Italy v Commission [1992] ECR I-4145, paragraphs 22-25.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 30. junija 1992 v zadevi C-312/90, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-4117, točke 14–17, in sodba Sodišča z dne 30. junija 1992 v zadevi C-47/91, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-4145, točke 22–25.
See Opinion of AG Trabucchi in Case 51/74 Hulst [1975] ECR 79.
Glej Mnenje AG Trabucchi v zadevi 51/74 Hulst [1975], Recueil, str. 79.
Case N 37/2003 (UK), available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eu_law/state_aids/comp-2003/n037-03.pdf
Zadeva N 37/2003 (Združeno kraljestvo), ki je na voljo na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/eu_law/state_aids/comp-2003/n037-03.pdf.
Ibid. paragraph 36.
Prav tam, točka 36.
In the context of the formal investigation procedure, the Norwegian authorities have clarified that users were only charged for accessing some of the facilities of the KLC (i.a. the swimming pool) but anyone could access the fitness centre free of charge until 1996 when the municipality started charging the users [5].2.2.2. Expansions in 1997-1999
V okviru formalnega postopka preiskave so norveški organi pojasnili, da se je uporabnikom zaračunavala le vstopnina za nekatere prostore centra KLC (med drugim za bazen); vstop v fitnes center je bil do leta 1996 brezplačen, nato pa je občina začela uporabnikom zaračunavati vstopnino [5].2.2.2 Razširitve 1997–1999
The Norwegian authorities have subsequently clarified that the fitness centre did indeed cover the full cost of the loan in 2008 by allocating the annual profit to the municipality [13].2.2.4. No funding from the county municipality of Nordland
Norveški organi so naknadno pojasnili, da je fitnes center dejansko pokril celotne stroške posojila v letu 2008, in sicer z dodelitvijo letnega dobička občini [13].2.2.4 Nobenih sredstev iz okrožne občine Nordland
The Norwegian authorities notified the financing of the fitness centre to the Authority in January 2009.
Norveški organi so Nadzornemu organu priglasili financiranje fitnes centra januarja 2009.
In the notification, the Norwegian authorities did not put forward any arguments to the effect that the financing of the fitness centre constituted existing aid, despite the fact that the notification included a copy of the writ of summons from the proceedings before the Norwegian courts wherein the applicant argued, at some length, that the financing of the fitness centre constituted new aid [19].In the Decision to open the formal investigation procedure, the Authority referred to the fact that the method of financing the fitness centre (covering the total deficit of the KLC over the municipal budget and allocation of revenue generated by ticket sales) was in place prior to the entry into force of the EEA Agreement, and could on this basis appear to constitute existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(i) of Part II of Protocol 3 [20].
V priglasitvi niso navedli argumentov, po katerih bi financiranje fitnes centra pomenilo obstoječo pomoč, čeprav je bila priglasitvi priložena kopija tožbenega zahtevka, vloženega pri norveških sodiščih, v katerem je pritožnik obsežno trdil, da financiranje fitnes centra pomeni novo pomoč [19].V odločitvi o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave se je Nadzorni organ skliceval na dejstvo, da je bil način financiranja fitnes centra (pokritje skupne razlike centra KLC iz občinskega proračuna in dodelitev prihodkov od prodaje vstopnic) uveljavljen že pred začetkom veljave Sporazuma EGP in bi lahko na tej podlagi dozdevno pomenil obstoječo pomoč v smislu člena 1(b)(i) dela II Protokola 3 [20].
Comments from the European Health & Fitness Association (the EHFA) The EHFA is an independent not-for-profit organisation representing the interests of the European health and fitness industry.
Pripombe evropske zveze za zdravje in fitnes (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EZZF)
No 204/11/COL
št. 204/11/COL
on the alleged state aid granted to companies belonging to the Norsk Film group (Norway)
o domnevni državni pomoči, dodeljeni podjetjem, ki pripadajo skupini Norsk Film (Norveška)
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY (“THE AUTHORITY”),
NADZORNI ORGAN EFTE (V NADALJNJEM BESEDILU: NADZORNI ORGAN) JE –
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), in particular to Articles 61 and 62,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) ter zlasti členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (“the Surveillance and Court Agreement”), in particular to Article 24,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču) ter zlasti člena 24 Sporazuma,
HAVING REGARD to Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement (“Protocol 3”), in particular to Article 1(2) of Part I and Articles 4(4) and 7(1) of Part II,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol 3) in zlasti člena 1(2) dela I ter člena 4(4) in člena 7(1) dela II,
HAVING CALLED on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to Article 6(1) of Part II of Protocol 3 [1],
PO pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu s členom 6(1) dela II Protokola 3 [1],
By letter dated 23 March 2006 (Event No 368163), several Norwegian film companies [2] complained that the Norwegian authorities had awarded annual grants to Norsk FilmStudio AS/Filmparken AS for the years 2000 - 2005.
Več norveških filmskih podjetij [2] se je z dopisom z dne 23. marca 2006 (ev. št. 368163) pritožilo, da so norveški organi podjetjema Norsk FilmStudio AS in Filmparken AS v letih od 2000 do 2005 odobrili letne subvencije.
After various exchanges of correspondence, the Authority adopted Decision No 491/09/COL to initiate the formal investigation procedure, published in the Official Journal of the European Union and in the EEA Supplement thereto [3].
Po izmenjavi korespondence je Nadzorni organ sprejel Odločbo št. 491/09/COL o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave, ki je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in v Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije [3].
The Authority called on interested parties to submit their comments.
Nadzorni organ je zainteresirane strani pozval, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
The Authority did not receive any comments from third parties.
Od tretjih strani ni prejel nobenih pripomb.
The Norwegian authorities submitted their observations by letter dated 2 February 2010 (Event No 545244).
Norveški organi so svoje pripombe predložili z dopisom z dne 2. februarja 2010 (ev. št. 545244).
Norsk Film AS was established in 1932 by the association of municipal cinemas.
Podjetje Norsk Film AS je bilo ustanovljeno leta 1932 kot združenje občinskih kinematografov.
During the 1950s and 1960s, Norsk Film AS was faced with financial difficulties which lead the government to allocate grants to it to guarantee its further existence.
V petdesetih in šestdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja se je podjetje Norsk Film AS spoprijemalo s finančnimi težavami, zaradi katerih mu je vlada dodelila subvencije in z njimi zagotovila njegovo nadaljnje poslovanje.
After the company was declared bankrupt in the late 1960s, the government decided to assume full responsibility for the future of the company.
Ko je podjetje konec šestdesetih let prejšnjega stoletja razglasilo stečaj, se je vlada odločila v celoti prevzeti odgovornost za njegovo prihodnost.
From 1974, the State kept an ownership of 77,6 % of the shares in the company.
Po letu 1974 je imela država v lasti 77,6 % delnic podjetja.
Norsk Film AS served two purposes: to provide Norwegian feature film production with the necessary facilities and to produce Norwegian films.
Podjetje Norsk Film AS je služilo dvema namenoma, tj. norveški produkciji celovečernih igranih filmov zagotoviti potrebne prostore in producirati norveške filme.
ScanCam AS was founded in 1986 by Norsk Film AS and the newspaper VG (Verdens Gang) on the basis of the existing camera department of Norsk Film AS.
Podjetje Norsk Film AS in časopis VG (Verdens Gang) sta leta 1986 ustanovila podjetje ScanCam AS na osnovi obstoječega oddelka za kamero podjetja Norsk Film AS.
Later, Norsk Film AS and Schibsted ASA each owned 50 % of the shares in ScanCam AS.
Pozneje sta imeli podjetji Norsk Film AS in Schibsted ASA vsako v lasti 50 % delnic podjetja ScanCam AS.
On 31 December 1998, Schibsted ASA sold its stake to Norsk Film AS and ScanCam AS continued as a 100 % owned subsidiary of Norsk FilmStudio AS as from 1999.
31. decembra 1998 je podjetje Schibsted ASA svoj delež prodalo podjetju Norsk Film AS, od leta 1999 pa je podjetje ScanCam AS poslovalo kot hčerinsko podjetje v 100-odstotni lasti podjetja Norsk FilmStudio AS.
Norsk FilmStudio AS, which was founded in 1989, was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Norsk Film AS.
Leta 1989 ustanovljeno podjetje Norsk FilmStudio AS je bilo hčerinsko podjetje v popolni lasti podjetja Norsk Film AS.
Until 1989, the studio and technical facilities were an integral division of Norsk Film AS.
Do leta 1989 so bili studijski in tehnični prostori sestavni oddelek podjetja Norsk Film AS.
Norsk FilmStudio AS was founded in order to establish a clear-cut distinction between the company’s role as a producer and its role of maintaining the infrastructure for film production (studio and technical facilities).
Podjetje Norsk FilmStudio AS je bilo ustanovljeno, da bi se jasno razmejili vlogi podjetja kot producenta in kot vzdrževalca infrastrukture za filmsko produkcijo (studijski in tehnični prostori).
In 2001, the Norwegian government reformed its film policy and a clearer distinction was made between the State’s areas of responsibility and the responsibility of the private sector.
Leta 2001 je norveška vlada reformirala svojo filmsko politiko, pri čemer je jasneje razmejila področja državne odgovornosti in odgovornosti zasebnega sektorja.
Private production companies should have the responsibility for producing films.
Zasebna produkcijska podjetja bi morala biti odgovorna za filmsko produkcijo.
It was therefore proposed to sell the shares in Norsk Film AS.
Zato je bila predlagana prodaja delnic podjetja Norsk Film AS.