natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the direct link between the presence of State aid elements in a measure consisting of a State guarantee and the necessity to establish (and pay) a (market) premium for such State intervention, the crucial question is whether the relief from the payment of a guarantee fee can be identified as a separate State aid element as compared to the advantage deriving from the guarantee as such.
Glede na neposredno zvezo med obstojem elementov državne pomoči v ukrepu državnega jamstva in potrebo po določitvi (in plačilu) (tržne) premije za tako državno intervencijo je glavno vprašanje, ali je oprostitev plačila jamstvene pristojbine mogoče opredeliti kot ločen element državne pomoči v primerjavi s prednostjo, ki izhaja iz samega jamstva.
An appropriate premium can neutralise at least part of the advantage granted to the beneficiary of the aid.
Primerna premija lahko nevtralizira vsaj del prednosti, podeljene prejemniku pomoči.
Had it been possible to establish a market premium for the guarantee at hand, corresponding to the risk for the State associated with the guarantee and had such premium been paid by HFF, the criteria of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement concerning the presence of State resources and of an economic advantage for HFF had not been met.
Tudi če bi bilo mogoče določiti tržno premijo za obravnavano jamstvo, ki bi ustrezala tveganju države, povezanem z jamstvom, in če bi tako premijo SFS plačal, ne bi bilo izpolnjeno merilo iz člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP o prisotnosti državnih sredstev in gospodarske prednosti za SFS.
Therefore, the premium constitutes an integral element of the calculation of the amount of State aid granted in the form of a guarantee.
Zato je premija sestavni element pri izračunu zneska državne pomoči, dodeljene v obliki jamstva.
Such conclusion also follows from the Guidelines on State guarantees, as referred to above.
Tak sklep izhaja tudi iz Smernic o državnih jamstvih, kot je navedeno zgoraj.
The Icelandic authorities expressed a similar view in their comments to the decision to initiate a formal investigation procedure (Decision No 406/08/COL).
Islandski organi so izrazili podobno stališče v svojih pripombah k odločbi o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave (Odločba št. 406/08/COL).
Moreover, the Icelandic authorities emphasised that the Act on State Guarantees was intended to be a general legislation on the conditions for granting State guarantees.
Poleg tega so islandski organi poudarili, da je bil zakon o državnih jamstvih mišljen kot splošni predpis o pogojih za dodelitev državnih jamstev.
The Act itself did not grant any guarantees as such, but just laid down conditions in respect of guarantees [19].
S samim zakonom niso bila dodeljena nobena jamstva, ampak so bili zgolj določeni pogoji glede jamstev [19].
Bearing in mind the above, the Authority considers that, due to the special nature of aid elements contained in a State aid measure in the form of a State guarantee, the relief of HFF from payment of a State guarantee premium does not constitute a separate State aid measure from the implicit and unlimited State guarantee provided by the Icelandic State, within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno Nadzorni organ meni, da zaradi posebne narave elementov pomoči v okviru ukrepa državne pomoči v obliki državnega jamstva oprostitev plačila premije za državno jamstvo, ki je bila odobrena SFS, ni ukrep državne pomoči, ločen od implicitnega in neomejenega državnega jamstva, ki ga zagotavlja islandska država v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP.
The lack of payment of a premium constitutes a part of the advantage and State resources engaged in the State guarantee granted to HFF.
Neplačevanje premije pomeni del prednosti in državnih sredstev, uporabljenih za državna jamstva, dodeljena SFS.
Given that the advantages deriving from this State guarantee are dealt with by the Authority in the State aid procedure on existing aid (cf. Case No 70382 (former 64865), Decision No 247/11/COL), the formal investigation procedure concerning the relief of HFF from payment of a State guarantee premium is without object and can be closed,
Glede na to, da prednosti na podlagi tega državnega jamstva Nadzorni organ obravnava v okviru postopka za državno pomoč, in sicer o obstoječi pomoči (glej zadevo št. 70382 (prej 64865), Odločbo št. 247/11/COL), je formalni postopek preiskave o oprostitvi plačila premije za državno jamstvo, ki je bila odobrena SFS, brezpredmeten in se lahko konča –
The formal investigation procedure concerning the relief of HFF from payment of a State guarantee premium is closed.
Formalni postopek preiskave o oprostitvi plačila premije za državno jamstvo, ki je bila odobrena SFS, je končan.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 406/08/COL of 27 June 2008 to initiate the formal investigation procedure with regard to the relief of the Icelandic Housing Financing Fund from payment of a State guarantee premium (OJ C 64, 19.3.2009, p. 21) and EEA Supplement No 15, 19.3.2009, p. 9.
Odločba Nadzornega organa Efte št. 406/08/COL z dne 27. junija 2008 o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave v zvezi z oprostitvijo plačila premije državnega jamstva za islandski stanovanjski finančni sklad, objavljena v UL C 64, 19.3.2009, str. 21, in v Dopolnilu EGP št. 15, 19.3.2009, str. 9.
See footnote 2 above for the publication references.
Glej opombo 2 zgoraj za podatke o objavi.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 405/08/COL of 27 June 2008 to close the formal investigation procedure with regard to the Icelandic Housing Financing Fund (OJ L 79, 25.3.2010, p. 40) and EEA Supplement No 14, 25.3.2010, p. 20.
Odločba Nadzornega organa Efte št. 405/08/COL z dne 27. junija 2008 o zaključku formalnega postopka preiskave v zvezi z islandskim stanovanjskim finančnim skladom, UL L 79, 25.3.2010, str. 40, in v Dopolnilu EGP št. 14, 25.3.2010, str. 20.
A non-confidential text of Decision No 247/11/COL is available on the Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/media/decisions/247-11-COL.pdf
Nezaupna različica Odločbe št. 247/11/COL je na voljo na spletni strani Nadzornega organa: http://www.eftasurv.int/media/decisions/247-11-COL.pdf.
The original predecessor of HFF, the State Housing Agency, was established in 1980.
Prvotna predhodnica SFS, namreč državna stanovanjska agencija, je bila ustanovljena leta 1980.
Case E-9/04 The Bankers’ and Securities Dealers’ Association of Iceland v EFTA Surveillance Authority [2006] EFTA Court Report, p. 42, paragraph 72.
Sodba z dne 7. aprila 2006 v zadevi The Bankers’ and Securities Dealers’ Association of Iceland proti Nadzornemu organu Efte (E-9/04, EFTA Court Report, str. 42, točka 72).
The Authority’s unofficial translation.
Neuradni prevod.
The original Icelandic text can be found at: http://www.althingi.is/altext/122/s/0099.html
Izvirno islandsko besedilo je na voljo na spletni strani: http://www.althingi.is/altext/122/s/0099.html.
See page 4 of the submission dated 8.9.2008 (Event No 490696).
Glej stran 4 dopisa z dne 8. septembra 2008 (ev. št. 490696).
Loans for which a risk premium had been paid, certain export guarantees and commitments due to credit balance in domestic currency accounts did not constitute a basis for calculation of the guarantee premium (cf. paragraph 2 of Article 9 of Act No 37/1961).
Jamstvena premija ni bila izračunana za posojila, za katera je bila plačana premija za tveganje, nekatera izvozna jamstva in obveznosti iz kreditnega salda v domači valuti (glej odstavek 2 člena 9 zakona št. 37/1961).
Entry into force on 1.1.1998.
Začel veljati 1. januarja 1998.
Entry into force on 11.1.2001.
Začel veljati 11. januarja 2001.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg [2003] ECR 1-7747.
Sodba z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg (C-280/00, Recueil, str. I-7747).
Originally, it was not intended to exempt the entirety of HFF’s obligations guaranteed by the State from the guarantee premium.
Prvotno ni bilo mišljeno, da se vse obveznosti SFS, za katere jamči država, oprostijo plačila jamstvene premije.
Available at http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=15646&1=1
Na voljo na spletni strani: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=15646&1=1.
See Chapter 1.2(4) of the Guidelines on State guarantees and Chapter 7.2(2) of the State aid guidelines on the application of State aid provisions to public enterprises in the manufacturing sector, available at http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=16995&1=1
Glej določbe točke 4 poglavja 1.2 Smernic o državnih jamstvih in poglavje 7.2(2) Smernic o državni pomoči glede uporabe določb o državni pomoči za javna podjetja v proizvodnem sektorju, ki so na voljo na spletni strani: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=16995&1=1.
Chapter 2.1 of the Guidelines on State guarantees.
Poglavje 2.1 Smernic o državnih jamstvih.
Letter dated 8.9.2008, p. 5.
Dopis z dne 8. septembra 2008, str. 5.
According to the Icelandic authorities, ever since the inception of HFF, the relevant rules of domestic law have been construed so as to exclude HFF from paying any fee for the State guarantee it enjoys [9].
Islandski organi zatrjujejo, da so bili relevantni predpisi domačega prava od ustanovitve SFS zasnovani tako, da SFS ni bilo treba plačevati nobene provizije za državno jamstvo, ki ga uživa [9].
No 367/11/COL
št. 367/11/COL
amending the list contained in point 39 of Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement on the European Economic Area listing border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway agreed for veterinary checks on live animals and animal products from third countries and repealing EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 111/11/COL
o spremembi seznama iz točke 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, ki navaja mejne kontrolne točke na Islandiji in na Norveškem, odobrene za veterinarske preglede živih živali ter živalskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav, ter o razveljavitvi Odločbe Nadzornega organa Efte št. 111/11/COL
HAVING REGARD to the Act referred to at point 1.1.4 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [1]), as amended and adapted to the EEA Agreement by the sectoral adaptations referred to in Annex I to that Agreement, and in particular to Article 6(2) thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU akta iz točke 1.1.4 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [1]), kakor je bil spremenjen in prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s sektorskimi prilagoditvami iz Priloge I k navedenemu sporazumu, in zlasti člena 6(2) akta,
HAVING REGARD to the Act referred to at point 1.2.111 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Commission Decision 2001/812/EC of 21 November 2001 laying down the requirements for the approval of border inspection posts responsible for veterinary checks on products introduced into the Community from third countries [2]), as amended, and in particular to Article 3(5) thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU akta iz točke 1.2.111 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Odločba Komisije 2001/812/ES z dne 21. novembra 2001 o zahtevah za odobritev mejnih kontrolnih točk, odgovornih za veterinarske preglede proizvodov, ki so vneseni v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [2]), kakor je bil spremenjen, in zlasti člena 3(5) akta,
EFTA Surveillance Authority (the Authority), by Decision No 111/11/COL of 11 April 2011 [3], repealed its Decision No 8/11/COL of 26 January 2011 [4] and drew up a new list of border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway approved for veterinary checks on live animal and animal products from third countries.On 30 May 2011 the Authority received a proposal from Iceland to change the categories of products of animal origin for two border inspection posts (BIPs) in Iceland.
Nadzorni organ Efte je z Odločbo št. 111/11/COL z dne 11. aprila 2011 [3] razveljavil svojo Odločbo št. 8/11/COL z dne 26. januarja 2011 [4] in sestavil nov seznam mejnih kontrolnih točk na Islandiji in na Norveškem, dogovorjenih za veterinarske preglede živih živali in živalskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav.Nadzorni organ je 30. maja 2011 od Islandije prejel predlog za spremembo kategorij proizvodov živalskega izvora za dve mejni kontrolni točki na Islandiji.
For BIP Keflavík Airport (IS KEF 4), it was requested to extend the scope of the category of animal products for human consumption to 'All Products' and to add a category for 'Other Products'.
Za mejno kontrolno točko letališče Keflavík (IS KEF 4) se je zahtevalo, da se področje uporabe kategorije živalski proizvodi za prehrano ljudi razširi na „vse proizvode“ ter da se doda kategorija za „druge proizvode“.
For BIP Reykjavík Eimskip (IS REY 1a), it was requested to extend the scope of the category of animal products for human consumption to 'All Products' and to change the category for 'Other Products' to 'All Packed Products'.
Za mejno kontrolno točko Reykjavík Eimskip (IS REY 1a) se je zahtevalo, da se področje uporabe kategorije živalski proizvodi za prehrano ljudi razširi na „vse proizvode“ ter da se kategorija „drugi proizvodi“ spremeni v kategorijo „vsi pakirani proizvodi“.
From 8 to 11 November 2011, the Authority carried out a joint inspection with the Food and Veterinary Office of the European Commission (FVO).
Nadzorni organ ter Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo Evropske komisije sta od 8. do 11. novembra 2011 izvedla skupni pregled.
In the course of that inspection, the border inspection posts of Keflavík Airport (IS KEF 4) and Reykjavík Eimskip (IS REY 1a) were visited.
Med tem pregledom sta bili obiskani mejni kontrolni točki letališče Keflavík (IS KEF 4) in Reykjavík Eimskip (IS REY 1a).
On the basis on the observations made during the joint inspection, a common recommendation was signed on 10 November 2011 by inspectors of the Authority and of the European Commission.
Inšpektorji Nadzornega organa in Evropske komisije so 10. novembra 2011 na podlagi ugotovitev skupnega pregleda podpisali skupno priporočilo.
According to the signed common recommendation, it is proposed:
V skladu s podpisanim skupnim priporočilom se predlaga:
For BIP Keflavík Airport (IS KEF 4), to extend the scope of the category of animal products for human consumption to 'All Products' and to add a category for 'Other Products'.
da se za mejno kontrolno točko letališče Keflavík (IS KEF 4) področje uporabe kategorije živalski proizvodi za prehrano ljudi razširi na „vse proizvode“ ter da se doda kategorija za „druge proizvode“.
The BIP should now be listed as HC(2), NHC(2).
Mejna kontrolna točka mora biti navedena kot HC(2), NHC(2).
For BIP Reykjavík Eimskip (IS REY 1a), to extend the scope of the category of animal products for human consumption to 'All Products' and to change the category for 'Other Products' to 'All Packed Products'.
da se za mejno kontrolno točko Reykjavík Eimskip (IS REY 1a) področje uporabe kategorije živalski proizvodi za prehrano ljudi razširi na „vse proizvode“ ter da se kategorija „drugi proizvodi“ spremeni v kategorijo „vsi pakirani proizvodi“.
The Authority, by its Decision No 365/11/COL, referred the matter to the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority.
Nadzorni organ je s svojo Odločbo št. 365/11/COL predložil zadevo Veterinarskemu odboru Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu Efte.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the unanimous opinion of the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the final text of the measures remains unchanged,
Ukrepi iz te odločbe so v skladu s soglasnim mnenjem Veterinarskega odbora Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu Efte, zato končna različica besedila o ukrepih ostane nespremenjena –
The EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 111/11/COL of 11 April 2011 is hereby repealed.
Odločba Nadzornega organa Efte št. 111/11/COL z dne 11. aprila 2011 se razveljavi.
This Decision shall enter into force on 30 November 2011.
Ta odločba začne veljati 30. novembra 2011.
OJ L 170, 30.6.2011, p. 39 and EEA Supplement No 36, 30.6.2011 p. 39.
UL C 170, 30.6.2011, str. 39 in Dopolnilo EGP št. 30.6.2011, str. 39.
OJ L 85, 31.3.2011, p. 27 and EEA Supplement No 16, 31.3.2011, p. 1.
UL C 85, 31.3.2011, str. 27 in Dopolnilo EGP št. 16, 31.3.2011, str. 1.
1 Name
1 Ime
Nagylak HU: This is a border inspection post (for products) and crossing point (for live animals) on the Hungarian Romanian border, subject to transitional measures as negotiated and laid down in the Treaty of Accession for both products and live animals.
Nagylak HU: to je mejna kontrolna točka (za proizvode) in prehodna točka (za žive živali) na madžarsko-romunski meji, za katero veljajo prehodni ukrepi, kakor so bili izpogajani in določeni v Pogodbi o pristopu, tako za proizvode kot za žive živali.
See Commission Decision 2003/630/EC
Glej: Odločba Komisije 2003/630/ES
No 394/11/COL
št. 394/11/COL
amending, for the eighty-third time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of state aid by introducing a new chapter on the application, from 1 January 2012, of state aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis
o triinosemdeseti spremembi procesnih in materialnih pravil na področju državne pomoči z vključitvijo novega poglavja o uporabi predpisov o državnih pomočeh v podporo ukrepom v korist bankam ob trenutni finančni in gospodarski krizi, od 1. januarja 2012 dalje
On 1 December 2011, the European Commission adopted a Communication on the application, from 1 January 2012, of State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis [1],This Communication is also of relevance for the European Economic Area,
Evropska komisija je 1. decembra 2011 sprejela Sporočilo o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za podporne ukrepe v korist bank v okviru finančne krize od 1. januarja 2012 dalje [1],Navedeno sporočilo velja tudi za Evropski gospodarski prostor.
Uniform application of the EEA State aid rules is to be ensured throughout the European Economic Area in line with the objective of homogeneity established in Article 1 of the EEA Agreement,
Enotno uporabo pravil o državni pomoči EGP je treba zagotoviti po celotnem Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru v skladu s ciljem homogenosti iz člena 1 Sporazuma EGP.
According to point II under the heading “GENERAL” on page 11 of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, the Authority, after consultation with the Commission, is to adopt acts corresponding to those adopted by the European Commission,
V skladu s točko II naslova „SPLOŠNO“ na strani 11 Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP mora Nadzorni organ po posvetovanju s Komisijo sprejeti akte, ki ustrezajo tistim, ki jih je sprejela Evropska komisija.
The Authority consulted the European Commission and the EFTA States by letters dated 2 December 2011 on the subject,
Nadzorni organ se je o vprašanju posvetoval z Evropsko komisijo in državami Efte v dopisih z dne 2. decembra 2011 –
The State Aid Guidelines shall be amended by introducing a new chapter on the application, from 1 January 2012, of state aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis.
Smernice o državnih pomočeh se spremenijo tako, da se vstavi novo poglavje o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za podporne ukrepe v korist bank v okviru finančne krize od 1. januarja 2012 dalje.
Only the English language version of this decision is authentic.
Besedilo te odločbe v angleškem jeziku je edino verodostojno.
THE APPLICATION, FROM 1 JANUARY 2012, OF STATE AID RULES TO SUPPORT MEASURES IN FAVOUR OF BANKS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS
UPORABA PRAVIL O DRŽAVNI POMOČI ZA PODPORNE UKREPE V KORIST BANK V OKVIRU FINANČNE KRIZE OD 1. JANUARJA 2012 DALJE
Since the beginning of the global financial crisis in the autumn of 2008, the EFTA Surveillance Authority (“the Authority”) has issued four sets of Guidelines [1] which provided detailed guidance on the criteria for the compatibility of state support to financial institutions [2] with the requirements of Article 61(3)(b) of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (the “EEA Agreement”).
Od začetka svetovne finančne krize jeseni 2008 je Nadzorni organ Efte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Nadzorni organ) izdal štiri sklope smernic [1], v katerih je predvidel podrobna navodila glede meril združljivosti državnih pomoči finančnim institucijam [2] z zahtevami iz člena 61(3)(b) Sporazuma o evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP).
The Chapters of the Guidelines in question are the application of state aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions in the context of the current global financial crisis [3] (“the Banking Guidelines”); the recapitalisation of financial institutions in the current financial crisis: limitation of aid to the minimum necessary and safeguards against undue distortions of competition [4] (“the Recapitalisation Guidelines”); the treatment of impaired assets in the EEA banking sector [5] (“the Impaired Assets Guidelines”) and the return to viability and the assessment of restructuring measures in the financial sector in the current crisis under the state aid rules [6] (“the Restructuring Guidelines”).
Poglavja navedenih smernic so uporaba pravil o državni pomoči za ukrepe v zvezi s finančnimi institucijami v okviru trenutne svetovne finančne krize [3] (smernice o bančništvu); dokapitalizacija finančnih institucij v trenutni finančni krizi: omejitev pomoči na najmanjšo potrebno in zaščitni ukrepi za preprečevanje neupravičenega izkrivljanja konkurence [4] (smernice o dokapitalizaciji); obravnavanje oslabljenih sredstev v bančnem sektorju EGP [5] (smernice o oslabljenih sredstvih) ter ponovna vzpostavitev uspešnega poslovanja in ocena ukrepov prestrukturiranja v finančnem sektorju v sedanji krizi na podlagi pravil o državni pomoči [6] (smernice o prestrukturiranju).
Three of those four Guidelines, the Banking, Recapitalisation and Impaired Assets Guidelines, set out the prerequisites for the compatibility of the main types of assistance granted by EFTA States – guarantees on liabilities, recapitalisations and asset relief measures – while the Restructuring Guidelines detail the particular features that a restructuring plan (or a viability plan) has to display in the specific context of crisis-related state aid granted to banks on the basis of Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement.
Trije od štirih sklopov smernic, in sicer smernice o bančništvu, dokapitalizaciji in oslabljenih sredstvih, določajo pogoje skladnosti glavnih vrst pomoči držav Efte – jamstev za obveznosti, dokapitalizacije in ukrepov finančne pomoči za oslabljena sredstva – medtem ko smernice o prestrukturiranju podrobno določajo, kakšne posebne lastnosti mora imeti načrt prestrukturiranja (ali načrt za uspešno poslovanje) v primeru državne pomoči, povezane s kriznimi ukrepi in dodeljene bankam na podlagi člena 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP.
On 2 March 2011, the Authority adopted a fifth set of Guidelines, on the application, from 1 January 2011, of state aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis [7] (“the Prolongation Guidelines”).
Nadzorni organ je 2. marca 2011 sprejel peti sklop smernic o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za podporne ukrepe v korist bank v okviru finančne krize od 1. januarja 2011 dalje [7] (smernice o podaljšanju).
The exacerbation of tensions in sovereign debt markets that has taken place in 2011 has put the banking sector in the EEA under increasing pressure, particularly in terms of access to term funding markets.
Zaradi poglabljanja napetosti na trgih državnega dolga v letu 2011 je bil bančni sektor EGP pod vse večjim pritiskom, zlasti kar se tiče dostopa do trgov srednje- in dolgoročnega financiranja.