natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Method of production conventional/organic (as detailed as possible).
Metoda pridobivanja običajna/ekološka (čim bolj natančno).
Area insofar relevant, district or region where the sample was collected, if possible with indication if it concerns rural area, urban area, industrial zone, harbour, open sea, etc., e.g. Brussels — urban area, Mediterranean — open sea.
Področje če je ustrezno, navedite območje ali pokrajino, v kateri je bil vzorec odvzet, če je možno, navedite, ali gre za ruralno območje, urbano območje, industrijski predel, pristanišče, odprto morje itd., npr. Bruselj – urbano območje, Sredozemlje – odprto morje.
It is of particular importance to clearly indicate the area in case the sample has been collected from food produced in regions which have been flooded.
Če je bil vzorec odvzet iz živila, proizvedenega v poplavljenih regijah, je še posebej pomembno, da območje jasno navedete.
Fat content (%) the percentage of fat content in the sample.
Vsebnost maščobe (%) odstotek vsebnosti maščobe v vzorcu.
Method of analysis refer to the method used.
Analizna metoda navedite uporabljeno metodo.
Accreditation status specify if the analytical method is accredited or not.
Stanje akreditacije navedite ali je analizna metoda akreditirana.
Uncertainty the decision limit or the percentage of the expanded measurement uncertainty embodied in the analytical method.
Negotovost meja odločitve ali odstotek razširjene merilne negotovosti analizne metode.
Lipid extraction method specify the lipid extraction method used to determine the fat content of the sample.
Metoda ekstrakcije lipidov navedite uporabljeno metodo ekstrakcije lipidov za določitev vsebnosti maščobe v vzorcu.
Dioxins, furans, dioxin-like PCBs results of every congener should be reported in ppt — picogram/gram (pg/g).
Dioksini, furani, dioksinom podobni PCB-ji rezultati za vsak kongener se navedejo v ppt – pikogram/gram (pg/g).
Non-dioxin-like PCBs results of every congener should be reported in ppb — nanogram/gram or microgram/kilo (ng/g or μg/kg).
Dioksinom nepodobni PCB-ji rezultati za vsak kongener se navedejo v ppb – nanogram/gram ali mikrogram/kilogram (ng/g ali μg/kg).
LOQ Limit of quantification in pg/g (for dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs) or μg/kg — ng/g (for non-dioxinlike PCBs).
MKD meja količinske določljivosti v pg/g (za dioksine, furane in dioksinom podobne PCB-je) ali μg/kg – ng/g (za dioksinom nepodobne PCB-je).
For PCB congeners analysed in addition to the PCB-6 and dioxin-like PCBs the number of the PCB congener needs to be added to the form, e.g. 31, 99, 110, etc. If the sample is analysed for more PCB congeners than there are marked rows, just add new rows at the bottom of the form.
Za kongenerje PCB, ki so bili analizirani poleg PCB-6 in dioksinom podobnih PCB-jev, je treba v obrazcu dodati številko kongenerja PCB, npr. 31, 99, 110 itd. Če je vzorec analiziran za več kongenerjev PCB, kot je označenih vrstic, dodajte nove vrstice na koncu obrazca.
General remarks to the table
Splošne opombe k razpredelnici
Form for reporting of congener-specific analytical results of dioxins, furans, dioxin-like PCBs and other PCBs in food
Obrazec za poročanje o specifičnih analitskih rezultatih kongenerjev dioksinov, furanov, dioksinom podobnih PCB-jev in drugih PCB-jev v živilih
Dioxins and furans (pg/g)
Dioksini in furani (pg/g)
(see remarks)
(glej opombe)
Recovery (%)
Izkoristek (%)
Non-ortho PCBs (pg/g)
Ne-orto PCB-ji (pg/g)
Mono-ortho PCBs (pg/g)
Mono-orto PCB-ji (pg/g)
Non-dioxin-like PCBs
Dioksinom nepodobni PCB-ji
Total PCB-6
Skupaj PCB -6
Other PCBs (μg/kg of ppb)
Drugi PCB-ji (μg/kg ali ppb)
Uncertainty
negotovosti
(Only to be stated if different from PCB-6)
(se navajajo le, če se razlikujejo od PCB-6)
No 127/07/COL
št. 127/07/COL
on Research and Development aid granted by the Research Council of Norway in connection with the development of the software programme Turborouter (Norway)
o pomoči za raziskave in razvoj, ki jo je Norveški raziskovalni svet dodelil v povezavi z razvojem programske opreme turborouter (Norveška)
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY [1], HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [2], in particular to Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26 thereof,
NADZORNI ORGAN EFTE JE [1] – OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [2] in zlasti členov 61 do 63 ter Protokola 26 Sporazuma,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice [3], in particular to Article 24 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča [3] in zlasti člena 24 Sporazuma,
HAVING REGARD to Article 1(2) and (3) in Part I and Articles 1, 4, 6, 7(3), 10, 13, 14, 16 and 20 in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement [4],
OB UPOŠTEVANJU člena 1(2) in (3) dela I in členov 1, 4, 6, 7(3), 10, 13, 14, 16 in 20 ter dela II Protokola 3 Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču [4],
HAVING REGARD to the Authority’s Guidelines [5] on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement, and in particular Chapter 14 thereof, ‘Aid for Research and Development’,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Smernic Nadzornega organa [5] o uporabi in razlagi členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma EGP ter zlasti poglavja 14 „Pomoč za raziskave in razvoj“,
HAVING REGARD to the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 on the implementing provisions referred to under Article 27 in Part II of Protocol 3 [6],
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Odločbe Nadzornega organa št. 195/04/COL z dne 14. julija 2004 o izvedbenih določbah iz člena 27 v delu II Protokola 3 [6],
HAVING REGARD to the Authority’s Decision No 217/94/COL of 1 December 1994 to propose appropriate measures to Norway on, amongst others, the aid scheme Industrial R&D Programmes,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Odločbe Nadzornega organa št. 217/94/COL z dne 1. decembra 1994 o predlogu ustreznih ukrepov za Norveško, med drugim, o shemi pomoči za programe industrijskih raziskav in razvoja,
HAVING REGARD to Norway’s acceptance of the proposed appropriate measures by letter dated 19 December 1994,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU, da je Norveška sprejela predlagane ustrezne ukrepe v dopisu z dne 19. decembra 1994,
HAVING REGARD to the Authority’s Decision No 60/06/COL of 8 March 2006 to open the formal investigation procedure with regard to R&D aid granted by the Research Council of Norway in connection with the development of the software programme Turborouter [7],
OB UPOŠTEVANJU upoštevanju Odločbe Nadzornega organa št. 60/06/COL z dne 8. marca 2006, o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave glede pomoči za raziskave in razvoj, ki jo je dodelil Norveški raziskovalni svet v povezavi z razvojem programske opreme turborouter [7],
HAVING CALLED on interested parties to submit their comments to this Decision and having regard to their comments,
PO POZIVU vsem zainteresiranim strankam, da predložijo svoje pripombe na to odločbo in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter dated 5 March 2002 (Doc. No 02-1733-A), the Authority received a complaint alleging that State aid had been granted by Norway through the Research Council of Norway (hereinafter the RCN) to various research projects in connection with the development of the software programme Turborouter.
V dopisu z dne 5. marca 2002 (dok. št. 02-1733-A) je Nadzorni organ prejel pritožbo, v kateri je bilo navedeno, da je Norveška preko Norveškega raziskovalnega sveta (v nadaljevanju „NRS“) dodelila državno pomoč različnim raziskovalnim projektom, povezanim z razvojem programske opreme turborouter.
The Authority requested information from the Norwegian authorities by letter dated 26 April 2002 (Doc. No 02-2605-D).
Nadzorni organ je zahteval informacijo od norveških organov z dopisom z dne 26. aprila 2002 (dok.št. 02-2605-D).
The Ministry of Trade and Industry replied by letter dated 3 June 2002 (Doc. No 02-4177-A), which included RCN’s comments on the Turborouter project.
Ministrstvo za trgovino in industrijo je odgovorilo z dopisom z dne 3. junija 2002 (dok. št. 02-4177-A), ki je vključevalo pripombe NRS o tako imenovanem projektu turborouter.
After various exchanges of correspondence [8], by letter dated 8 March 2006 (Event No 363353), the Authority informed the Norwegian authorities that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 1(2) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement in respect of R&D aid granted by the Research Council of Norway in connection with the development of the software programme Turborouter.
Po obširnem dopisovanju [8] je Nadzorni organ 8. marca 2006 (dogodek št. 363353) obvestil norveške organe, da se je odločil začeti postopek v skladu s členom 1(2) v delu I Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču glede pomoči za raziskave in razvoj, ki jo je dodelil Norveški raziskovalni svet v povezavi z razvojem programske opreme turborouter.
By letter dated 7 April 2006, the Norwegian authorities submitted comments to the Authority’s decision to open the formal investigation procedure.
V dopisu z dne 7. aprila 2006 so norveški organi predložili pripombe k odločbi Nadzornega organa, da sproži formalni postopek preiskave.
The Authority’s Decision No 60/06/COL to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement thereof [9].
Odločba Nadzornega organa št. 60/06/COL o sprožitvi postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije [9].
The Authority called on interested parties to submit their comments.
Nadzorni organ je pozval zainteresirane stranke k predložitvi pripomb.
The Authority received comments from one interested party.
Prejel je pripombe od ene zainteresirane stranke.
By letter dated 1 December 2006 (Event No 400677) the Authority forwarded these comments to the Norwegian authorities.
V dopisu z dne 1. decembra 2006 (dogodek št. 400677) je Nadzorni organ posredoval te pripombe norveškim organom.
By letter from the Ministry for Government Administration and Reform dated 8 January 2007 (Event No 405517) forwarding a letter from the Ministry of Education and Research dated 5 January 2007, the Norwegian authorities submitted comments.
Norveški organi so predložili svoje pripombe v dopisu ministrstva za državno upravo in reforme z dne 8. januarja 2007 (dogodek št. 405517), v katerem je bil posredovan dopis ministrstva za izobraževanje in raziskovalno delo z dne 5. januarja 2007.
The four projects related to the software programme Turborouter supported with RCN funds
Štirje projekti, povezani z razvojem programske opreme turborouter, podprti s sredstvi NRS
In the following, the Authority will only provide a brief description of the projects under assessment.
V nadaljevanju je Nadzorni organ pripravil le kratek opis projektov, ki se ocenjujejo.
For a detailed description of each of them, reference is made to the Authority’s Decision No 60/06/COL [10].
Podrobni opisi posameznih projektov so navedeni v Odločbi Nadzornega organa št. 60/06/COL [10].
Project 40049 — Strategic activities within maritime transport and logistics (the first version of the software programme Turborouter)
Projekt 40049 – Strateške dejavnosti pri pomorskem prevozu in logistiki (prva različica programske opreme turborouter)
Turborouter is a tool [11] for optimising vessel fleet scheduling, i.e. to decide which vessels to assign different cargoes to.
Turborouter je orodje [11] za boljše načrtovanje časovnega razporeda plovil, to je za odločanje, kateri ladji dodeliti različne tovore.
It combines the knowledge and experience of the planners with the calculating capabilities of the computer.
Združuje znanje in izkušnje načrtovalcev z računskimi sposobnostmi računalnika.
Turborouter is based on electronic sea charts where scheduling information can be displayed and includes a database for vessels, ports, cargoes, etc; automatic calculation of port-to-port distances; vessel position reports and automatic update of estimated time of arrival; sophisticated optimisation routines for fleet scheduling and schedule visualisation or schedule calculator for manual planning.The first version of the pilot software Turborouter was developed in the first year of research of one of the sub-projects of Project 40049 ‘Strategic activities within maritime transport and logistics’ called ‘Methods and analytical tools for design and operation of integrated transport and logistics chains’.
Turborouter temelji na elektronskih pomorskih kartah z možnostjo prikaza informacij o razporedu ter vključuje zbirko podatkov za plovila, pristanišča, tovore itd; samodejen izračun razdalj med pristanišči; poročila o položaju plovil in samodejno posodabljanje ocenjenega časa prihoda; kompleksno optimizacijo postopkov za razporejanje plovil in prikaz razporeda ali izračun razporeda pri ročnem načrtovanju.Prvo različico pilotske programske opreme turborouter so razvili v prvem letu raziskav enega od podprojektov Projekta 40049 „Strateške dejavnosti pri pomorskem prevozu in logistiki“, imenovanem „Postopki in analitična orodja za razvoj in delovanje integriranih transportnih in logističnih verig“.
Further development of the software programme Turborouter
Nadaljnji razvoj programske opreme turborouter
According to the information provided by the Norwegian authorities, the RCN selected several projects related to the development of the software package Turborouter for R&D support.
Po informacijah norveških organov je NRS izbral več projektov, povezanih z razvojem paketa programske opreme turborouter za podporo za raziskave in razvoj.
The aim of this project [12] was to develop and carry out practical tests of algorithms to calculate the optimal utilisation of a fleet of ships, given the obligations to load cargoes for several customers, the requirements as to when cargoes must be loaded and discharged in the destination port, the possibility of carrying joint cargoes of a limited number of bulk goods on each voyage, as well as limitations that mean that not all the vessels involved are suitable for serving all customers or all ports.
Cilj tega projekta [12] je bil razviti in izvesti uporabne preskuse algoritmov za izračun optimalne uporabe ladjevja ob upoštevanju obveznosti natovarjanja tovora za različne stranke, zahtev glede časa natovarjanja in raztovarjanja v namembnem pristanišču, možnosti prevoza skupnega tovora omejenega števila razsutih tovorov na vsaki vožnji, kot tudi omejitev, ki pomenijo, da vsa vključena plovila niso primerna za prevoz tovora za vse stranke ali v vsa pristanišča.
Algorithms should be integrated into a software concept that would offer users full control and the possibility of overriding the suggestions made by the algorithms.
Algoritme bi bilo treba vključiti v zasnovo programske opreme, ki bi uporabnikom omogočila popoln nadzor in možnost razveljavljanja predlogov, izračunanih z algoritmi.
According to the information submitted by the Norwegian authorities, the Project AlgOpt was only a pre-study defining the user requirements and investigation of the feasibility of using Turborouter for the contract partner, the company Beltship Management AS.
Po informacijah, posredovanih od norveških organov, je bil projekt AlgOpt samo predhodna študija, ki je opredelila uporabnikove zahteve in raziskala izvedljivost uporabe turborouterja za pogodbenega partnerja, podjetje Beltship Management AS.
The Shiplog project mainly dealt with transport at sea.
Projekt Shiplog se je ukvarjal predvsem s pomorskim prevozom.
This project [13] was supposed to use the results of a previous project called Shiplog (which did not involve the use of Turborouter) to focus on the requirements for door-to-door delivery of goods, when transport at sea is a key element.
Ta projekt [13] naj bi uporabljal rezultate prejšnjega projekta, imenovanega Shiplog (ki ni vključeval uporabe turborouterja), da bi se osredotočil na zahteve dostave blaga od-vrat-do-vrat, kadar je pomorski promet ključni dejavnik.
One of the main activities concerned the integration of Transport Chain Management System (TCMS) and Turborouter, which should specify the interface and demonstrate the exchange of information between Turborouter and the TCMS demonstrator.
Ena od glavnih dejavnosti je zadevala vključevanje sistema za upravljanje prevozne verige (TCMS) in turborouterja, ki bi določila vmesnik in prikazala izmenjavo podatkov med turborouterjem in prikazovalnikom TCMS.
This project failed to achieve its objective mainly because TCMS and Turborouter could not be satisfactorily integrated.
Projekt ni izpolnil svojega cilja, predvsem zato, ker sistema TCMS in turborouterja ni bilo mogoče uspešno združiti.
Project 144214 — Library of optimisation routines for scheduling in shipping
Projekt 144214 – Knjižnica postopkov za optimizacijo razporejanja v ladijskem prometu
The pre-competitive research project ‘Library of optimisation routines for scheduling in shipping’ was aimed at developing algorithms for advanced optimisation and scheduling of very complex shipping operations.
Cilj predkonkurenčnega raziskovalnega projekta „Knjižnica postopkov za optimizacijo razporejanja v ladijskem prometu“ je bil razviti algoritme za napredno optimizacijo in razporejanje zelo zapletenih dejavnosti v prometu z ladijskimi tovori.
The Norwegian authorities have explained that the library of algorithms is very trade and company specific and must thus be company owned and not part of the standard Turborouter ‘tool kit’.
Norveški organi so pojasnili, da je knjižnica algoritmov posebej povezana s prometom in podjetjem, in mora zato biti v lasti podjetja, ne pa del standardnega „orodja“ programa turborouter.
Description of the relationship between the four grants of aid and the Norwegian aid scheme for industrial R&D programmes
Opis odnosa med štirimi dodeljenimi pomočmi in norveško shemo pomoči za programe industrijskih raziskav in razvoja
According to the information provided by the Norwegian authorities, the four grants of aid covered by the present Decision received aid within the framework of the aid scheme ‘Industrial R&D Programmes’ (brukerstyrte forskningsprogrammer).
Glede na informacije, ki so jih zagotovili norveški organi, je bila s to odločbo v okviru sheme pomoči „programi industrijskih raziskav in razvoja“ (brukerstyrte forskningsprogrammer) pomoč dodeljena štirim projektom.
The aid scheme called ‘Industrial R&D Programmes’ (brukerstyrte forskningsprogrammer) which was administered by the RCN was established prior to the entry into force of the EEA Agreement.
Shemo pomoči, imenovano „programi industrijskih raziskav in razvoja“ (brukerstyrte forskningsprogrammer), ki jo je dodelil NRS, so uvedli pred začetkom veljavnosti Sporazuma EGP.
In December 1994, the Authority adopted a Decision on several aid schemes for research and development existing in Norway prior to the entry into force of the EEA Agreement, amongst others, the aid scheme Industrial R&D Programme (brukerstyrte forskningsprogrammer, Case No 93-183).
Decembra 1994 je Nadzorni organ sprejel odločbo o več shemah pomoči za raziskave in razvoj, ki so na Norveškem obstajale pred začetkom veljavnosti Sporazuma EGP, med drugimi o shemi pomoči program industrijskih raziskav in razvoja (rukerstyrte forskningsprogrammer, št. primera 93-183).
In this Decision, the Authority proposed appropriate measures to bring the scheme in line with the State aid rules of the EEA Agreement [14].
V tej odločbi je Nadzorni organ predlagal ustrezne ukrepe za uskladitev te pomoči s predpisi o državni pomoči Sporazuma EGP [14].
In particular, the Authority proposed to Norway the introduction of detailed provisions which would ensure that awards of aid were granted in accordance with the principles laid down in Chapter 14 of the State Aid Guidelines.Norway accepted the appropriate measures proposed by the Authority by letter dated 19 December 1994.
Nadzorni organ je Norveški še posebej predlagal uvedbo natančnejših določb, ki bi zagotavljale, da je pomoč bila dodeljena v skladu z načeli, določenimi v poglavju 14 Smernic o državni pomoči.Norveška je sprejela ustrezne ukrepe, ki jih je Nadzorni organ predlagal v dopisu z dne 19. decembra 1994.
The acceptance of appropriate measures implied that the award of aid under the Industrial R&D Programme would be done in accordance with the provisions of the Authority’s R&D Guidelines as they were adopted in 1994.
Sprejetje ustreznih ukrepov je pomenilo, da bi se pomoč v okviru programa industrijskih raziskav in razvoja dodelila v skladu z določbami Smernic Nadzornega organa o raziskavah in razvoju, kot so bile sprejete leta 1994.
The aid was granted by the RCN to these projects within the R&D scheme Industrial R&D Programme.
NRS je pomoč tem projektom dodelil v okviru sheme programa industrijskih raziskav in razvoja.
Doubts of the Authority expressed in Decision No 60/06/COL
Dvomi Nadzornega organa, izraženi v Odločbi št. 60/06/COL
On 8 March 2006, the Authority decided to open the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 1(2) in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement on R&D aid granted by the RCN in connection with the development of the software programme Turborouter (Decision No 60/06/COL).
Nadzorni organ se je 8. marca odločil sprožiti formalni postopek preiskave iz člena 1(2) v delu II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču o pomoči za raziskave in razvoj, ki jo je NRS dodelil v povezavi z razvojem programske opreme turborouter (Odločba št. 60/06/COL).
In the opening decision, the Authority described the complaint, the four projects related to the software programme Turborouter supported with RCN funds and the relationship between the four grants of aid and the Norwegian scheme for Industrial R&D Programmes.
V uvodni odločbi je Nadzorni organ opisal pritožbo, štiri projekte, povezane z razvojem programske opreme turborouter, podprte s sredstvi NRS, in odnos med štirimi dodeljenimi pomočmi in norveško shemo za programe industrijskih raziskav in razvoja.
The Authority made a detailed assessment of the applicable legal framework to the assessment of the four projects concerned [15].
Nadzorni organ je podrobno ocenil veljavni pravni okvir za ocenitev štirih zadevnih projektov [15].
Following the acceptance of the appropriate measures suggested in the Authority’s Decision No 217/94/COL, any grant of aid under the Industrial R&D Programme had to be done in accordance with the 1994 R&D Guidelines.
Po sprejetju ustreznih ukrepov, predlaganih v Odločbi Nadzornega organa št. 217/94/COL, je morala biti vsaka pomoč v okviru programa industrijskih raziskav in razvoja dodeljena v skladu s Smernicami o raziskavah in razvoju iz leta 1994.
Hence, by definition, any aid granted under the scheme Industrial R&D Programmes which does not comply with the provisions of the 1994 R&D Guidelines would fall outside the scope of application of the scheme.
Zato nobena pomoč, dodeljena po shemi programov industrijskih raziskav in razvoja , ki ne ustreza določbam Smernic o raziskavah in razvoju iz leta 1994, ne bi sodila na področje uporabe sheme.
Accordingly, it would constitute new individual aid and should, as such, be notified to the Authority individually and be assessed on the basis of the R&D Guidelines applicable at the time the aid was granted.
To bi torej bila nova posamezna pomoč, ki bi jo kot takšno morali posebej priglasiti Nadzornemu organu ter jo oceniti na podlagi Smernic o raziskavah in razvoju, ki so veljale v času dodelitve pomoči.
As to the reasons for opening the formal investigation, the Authority expressed doubts on several points as to whether the four R&D projects concerned had received support within the framework of the aid scheme Industrial R&D Programmes.
Kar zadeva razloge za začetek formalne preiskave je Nadzorni organ v več točkah izrazil dvom, da so štirje zadevni projekti raziskav in razvoja dobili podporo v okviru sheme pomoči programov industrijskih raziskav in razvoja.
The Authority had doubts as to whether these projects went beyond the stage of applied or pre-competitive research to constitute a commercial product.
Nadzorni organ je imel pomisleke, ali ti projekti niso prestopili stopnje uporabne ali predkonkurenčne raziskave in postali tržni proizvod.