natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The lease agreement therefore ceased to exist on 30 June 2006 and no further effects are created as a result of that agreement.
Zakupna pogodba je torej prenehala obstajati 30. junija 2006 in zaradi navedene pogodbe ni nobenih nadaljnjih učinkov.
Under these circumstances, a decision by the Authority on the classification as aid of the measure in question and on its compatibility with the EEA Agreement would have no practical effect [13].2.
Pod temi pogoji odločba Nadzornega organa o naravi pomoči zadevnih ukrepov in njihovi združljivosti s Sporazumom EGP ne bi imela nobenega stvarnega učinka [13].2.
‘Save as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any aid granted by EC Member States, EFTA States or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Contracting Parties, be incompatible with the functioning of this Agreement.’
„Razen če ta sporazum ne določa drugače, je vsaka pomoč, ki jo dodelijo države članice ES, države Efte, ali kakršna koli vrsta pomoči iz državnih sredstev, ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco z dajanjem prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga, nezdružljiva z delovanjem tega sporazuma, če prizadene trgovino med pogodbenicami.“
The State Aid Guidelines on State aid elements in sales of land and buildings by public authorities give further information on how the Authority interprets and applies the provisions of the EEA Agreement governing State aid when it comes to assessing sales of public land and buildings.
Smernice o državni pomoči o elementih državne pomoči pri prodaji zemljišč in objektov s strani javnih oblasti dajejo dodatna navodila, kako Nadzorni organ razlaga in uporablja določbe sporazuma EGP o državni pomoči, kadar gre za ocenjevanje prodaje zemljišč in objektov s strani javnih organov.
Section 2.1 describes a sale through an unconditional bidding procedure, while Section 2.2 describes a sale without an unconditional procedure (by way of an independent expert valuation).
Oddelek 2.1 opisuje prodajo preko brezpogojnega ponudbenega postopka, oddelek 2.2 pa prodajo brez brezpogojnega postopka (na podlagi neodvisne strokovne cenitve).
These two procedures allow EFTA States to handle sales of land and buildings in a way that precludes the existence of State aid.
Ta dva postopka državam Efte omogočata izvedbo prodaje zemljišč in objektov na način, ki izključuje obstoj državne pomoči.
The measure must be granted by the State or through state resources.
Ukrep mora dodeliti država ali mora biti dodeljen iz državnih sredstev.
The NDEA being a State body, its resources are state resources.
NDEA je državni organ, njena sredstva so državna sredstva.
Sale of publicly owned land and buildings below market value implies that state resources are involved.
Prodaja zemljišč in objektov v javni lasti pod tržno vrednostjo pomeni, da so vpletena državna sredstva.
However, the State Aid Guidelines on State aid elements in sales of land and buildings provides for two cases where, if the applicable conditions are met, the price paid for the property will be held to correspond to fair market value thereby excluding the presence of state resources.
Vendar Smernice o državni pomoči o elementih državne pomoči pri prodaji zemljišč in objektov s strani javnih oblasti določajo dva primera ko, če so izpolnjeni veljavni pogoji, mora cena, plačana za nepremičnino, ustrezati pošteni tržni vrednosti in s tem izključuje prisotnost državnih sredstev.
As noted above, two situations should be distinguished: cases where the sale has taken place through an unconditional bidding procedure (see (i) below) and those where the sale has taken place with reference to value assessments carried out by independent experts (see (ii) below).
Kakor je navedeno zgoraj, je treba razlikovati dva primera: primere prodaje preko brezpogojnega ponudbenega postopka (glej (i) spodaj) in primere prodaje s sklicevanjem na ocene vrednosti, ki jih naredijo neodvisni strokovnjaki (glej (ii) spodaj).
sale through an unconditional bidding procedure
prodaja preko brezpogojnega ponudbenega postopka
The Norwegian authorities recognise that ‘the process started out as an unconditional bidding procedure regarding the sale of parts of the air base.
Norveški organi priznavajo, da se je „proces začel kot brezpogojni ponudbeni postopek glede prodaje delov letalskega oporišča.
Advertisements listing possible uses of the air base were published in different newspapers such as Farsund avis, Fedrelandsvennen and Stavanger Aftenblad in 2000.’
V različnih časopisih, kot so Farsund avis, Fedrelandsvennen in Stavanger Aftenblad so bili leta 2000 objavljeni oglasi, v katerih so bile naštete možne uporabe letalskega oporišča“.
Neither the advertisements nor the so-called ‘Lista Conference’ led to any sale.
Niti oglasi niti tako imenovana „Konferenca Lista“ niso vodili do prodaje.
The process did not cover the case of a sale of the air base en bloc.
Proces ni zajemal primera prodaje letalskega oporišča v svežnju.
This is confirmed by the Report from the Auditor General which concluded that neither a valuation of the entire property nor a public announcement of the intended sale had been made prior to the start of negotiations with Lista Flypark AS in March 2002.
To je potrdilo Poročilo Urada glavnega revizorja, iz katerega je razvidno, da pred začetkom pogajanj s podjetjem Lista Flypark AS marca 2002, ni bila narejena cenitev celotne nepremičnine in da ni bilo javne objave nameravane prodaje.
The Authority therefore considers that there was no unconditional bidding procedure in connection with the sale of the air base en bloc and that the possibility to preclude the existence of State aid on that basis, pursuant to Section 2.1 of the State Aid Guidelines on State aid elements in sales of land and buildings, is therefore excluded.
Zato Nadzorni organ meni, da v povezavi s prodajo letalskega oporišča v svežnju ni bilo brezpogojnega ponudbenega postopka in da je zato izključena možnost, da se na podlagi oddelka 2.1 Smernic o državni pomoči o elementih državne pomoči pri prodaji zemljišč in objektov obstoj državne pomoči izključi na tej podlagi.
sale without an unconditional bidding procedure (expert valuation)
prodaja brez brezpogojnega ponudbenega postopka (neodvisna strokovna cenitev)
Section 2.2 of the State Aid Guidelines on State aid elements in sales of land and buildings by public authorities, regarding sale without an unconditional bidding procedure, provides that ‘if public authorities intend not to use the procedure described under Section 2.1, an independent evaluation should be carried out by one or more independent asset valuers prior to the sale negotiations in order to establish the market value on the basis of generally accepted market indicators and valuation standards.
Oddelek 2.2 Smernic o državni pomoči o elementih državne pomoči pri prodaji zemljišč in objektov s strani javnih oblasti glede prodaje brez brezpogojnega ponudbenega postopka določa, da „če javne oblasti ne nameravajo uporabiti postopka, opisanega v oddelku 2.1, mora pred dogovori o prodaji en cenilec ali več opraviti neodvisno oceno, da se določi tržna vrednost na podlagi splošno sprejetih tržnih kazalcev in cenilskih standardov.
The market price thus established is the minimum purchase price that can be agreed without granting state aid.’ (Emphasis added)
Tako določena tržna cena je najnižja nakupna cena, ki se lahko določi brez dodelitve državne pomoči.“ (Poudarki dodani)
The Norwegian authorities have indicated that NDEA ordered two value assessments, by the real estate value assessor firms OPAK and Verditakst AS.
Norveški organi so navedli, da je NDEA naročila dve oceni vrednosti in sicer pri podjetjih za ocenjevanje vrednosti nepremičnin OPAK in Verditakst AS.
Both reports estimated a market value for the property, excluding obligations relating to fire safety standards, technical or infrastructure improvements or the lease agreement.
Obe poročili sta ocenili tržno vrednost za nepremičnino, pri čemer so izključene obveznosti v zvezi s standardi požarne varnosti, tehnične ali infrastrukturne izboljšave in zakupna pogodba.
The price paid by the purchaser was determined by reference to the valuation report which was carried out by Verditakst, i.e. NOK 11000000.
Cena, ki jo plača kupec, je bila določena glede na poročilo o cenitvi, ki ga je opravil Verditakst, tj. 11000000 NOK.
However, OPAK had concluded that the value of the property on the date of the sale was NOK 32000000 and the sales price stated in the lease agreement was NOK 25000000 for the whole airport.
Vendar je OPAK ugotovil, da je bila vrednost nepremičnine na dan prodaje 32000000 NOK in da je bila prodajna cena, navedena v zakupni pogodbi 25000000 NOK za celo letališče.
Faced with such a range of valuations, the Authority opened a formal investigation and appointed an independent expert, Mr Geir Saastad, whose assignment was to:
Ker je bil Nadzorni organ soočen s takim razponom cenitev, je sprožil formalni postopek preiskave in imenoval g. Geira Saastada za neodvisnega strokovnjaka z nalogo:
compare all value assessments provided to the Authority,
primerjati vse ocene vrednosti, ki so bile predložene Nadzornemu organu,
determine (i) the market value of the air base and (ii) the value of the obligations relating to the land and buildings.
določiti (i) tržno vrednost letalskega oporišča in (ii) vrednost obveznosti v zvezi z zemljišči in objekti.
The expert also appraised whether the behaviour of the State while selling this property corresponded to that of a private market investor or whether, on the contrary, a private market investor would have acted differently.
Strokovnjak je tudi ocenil, ali je država med prodajo te nepremičnine ravnala kot zasebni vlagatelj v tržno gospodarstvo ali pa bi zasebni vlagatelj v tržno gospodarstvo ravnal drugače.
In so doing, the expert took into account the particular nature of the property and the difficulty the Norwegian authorities argue they have been faced with due to the existing lease agreement entered into with LILAS and the possibility for the latter to purchase the property at the end of a 10 year period.
Pri tem je strokovnjak upošteval posebno naravo nepremičnine in težavo, za katero norveški organi trdijo, da so jo imeli zaradi obstoječe zakupne pogodbe, sklenjene s podjetjem LILAS, ter možnosti slednjega, da ob koncu desetletnega obdobja nepremičnino kupi.
The expert assessed the methods used in the two existing valuations and concluded that the OPAK report, while it applies low rental prices probably reflecting the rates actually in force, does not take account of the fact that a part of the property is rented to LILAS for a fixed price (NOK 10000 per year) which is considerably less than what was assumed to be a market rent.
Strokovnjak je ocenil metode, uporabljene v obeh obstoječih cenitvah in ugotovil, da poročilo OPAK-a uporablja nizke najemnine, ki verjetno odražajo dejansko veljavne cene, vendar ne upošteva dejstva, da je bil del nepremičnine podjetju LILAS oddan v najem za fiksno ceno (10000 NOK na leto), kar je znatno manj, kot naj bi bila tržna najemnina.
The allowance for vacancies and maintenance would also appear to be ‘far too low’.
Dodatek za prazna mesta in vzdrževanje se tudi zdi „veliko prenizek“.
In this regard the expert indicated that costs related to annual vacancy of 20 % would not be excessive given the nature of the property.
V tej zvezi je strokovnjak navedel, da stroški, povezani z letnimi praznimi mesti v višini 20 % zaradi narave nepremičnine ne bi bili čezmerni.
In addition, the expert indicated that significant operating and maintenance costs should be added.
Poleg tega je strokovnjak navedel, da bi bilo treba dodati visoke stroške poslovanja in vzdrževanja.
Together these expenses would reduce the value of the cash flow from NOK 26 million (as estimated by OPAK) to NOK 10 million.
Skupaj bi ti odhodki zmanjšali vrednost denarnega toka od 26 milijonov NOK (kot je ocenil OPAK) na 10 milijonov NOK.
Finally, the value of the land itself should have been discounted to take account of the difficulty in selling plots on the site.
Treba bi bilo tudi znižati vrednost zemljišča samega, da se upošteva težavnost prodaje parcel na tem območju.
The expert also noted, in the context of his comments on the OPAK report, that the sales price stated in the lease agreement of NOK 25000000 was entirely hypothetical.
Strokovnjak je tudi opozoril, da je v okviru njegovih pripomb o poročilu OPAK prodajna cena 25000000 NOK, navedena v zakupni pogodbi, povsem hipotetična.
The Verditakst report also failed to take into account the fact that part of the property is rented to LILAS at a rate which represents a considerable reduction in income relative to the assumption that the property should be let out at market rate.
Poročilo Verditakst tudi ne upošteva dejstva, da je nepremičnina podjetju LILAS oddana v najem po stopnji, ki predstavlja znatno zmanjšanje dohodka glede na predpostavko, da bi bilo nepremičnino treba dati v najem po tržni ceni.
However, the market rates used correspond to what the expert himself had assumed (see Section 4 of the report).
Vendar uporabljene tržne cene ustrezajo tistim, ki jih je strokovnjak sam predpostavljal (glej oddelek 4 poročila).
In addition, the expert notes that Verditakst had applied figures for operating and maintenance costs that correspond to the standard values applied by the industry.
Poleg tega strokovnjak poudarja, da je Verditakst za stroške poslovanja in vzdrževanja uporabil številke, ki ustrezajo standardnim vrednostim, ki jih uporablja gospodarska panoga.
Finally, he notes that the estimation for the value of the land itself is more conservative than that of OPAK and expresses the opinion that this seems more appropriate than a higher valuation.
Poudarja tudi, da je ocena vrednosti zemljišča bolj konzervativna od OPAK-ove ocene in izraža mnenje, da se to zdi bolj ustrezno kot višja cenitev.
When comparing the two reports the expert found that: ‘The chief difference between the valuations lies in their calculations of operating and maintenance costs.
Strokovnjak je pri primerjavi obeh poročil ugotovil, da: „je glavna razlika med cenitvama izračun stroškov poslovanja in vzdrževanja.
Verditakst’s valuation reflects the standard figures applied by the property industry, whereas OPAK’s valuation does not.’
Cenitev Verditaksta odraža standardne številke, ki jih uporablja nepremičninska gospodarska panoga, cenitev OPAK-a pa ne.“
The expert concluded that: ‘the sales price applied in the transaction in 2002 would appear to be on a par with the estimated market value.
Strokovnjak je ugotovil, da: „se zdi, da je bila prodajna cena, uporabljena v transakciji leta 2002, enaka ocenjeni tržni vrednosti.
Lista air base was sold at a time when there was limited interest in this type of property.
Letalsko oporišče Lista je bilo prodano v času, ko je bilo zanimanje za te vrste nepremičnin omejeno.
The property market and the financial markets had taken a downturn, at the same time as which the property can only be characterised as complicated and remote.
Nepremičninski in finančni trgi so upadli, hkrati pa lahko za nepremičnino rečemo le, da je zapletena in oddaljena.
The criteria applied by Verditakst in their valuation were more correct than those applied in OPAK’s valuation.
Merila, ki jih je pri cenitvi uporabil Verditakst, so bila bolj pravilna od meril, uporabljenih v cenitvi OPAK-a.
The main objection to OPAK’s valuation is that it failed to apply normal operating expenses when calculating the value of the property.
Glavni ugovor cenitvi OPAK-a je, da pri izračunu vrednosti nepremičnine niso bili uporabljeni običajni stroški poslovanja.
The compensation for the obligations transferred from NDEA to Lista Flypark AS in connection with the sale does not seem unreasonably high given the number of buildings on the site and the size of the land area involved.’
Nadomestilo za obveznosti, prenesene iz NDEA na podjetje Lista Flypark AS v povezavi s prodajo, se ne zdi nerazumno visoko, če se upošteva število objektov na kraju in velikost zemljišča, ki je vključeno.“ (Poudarki dodani)
(Emphasis added) The expert insisted on the fact that considerable uncertainty will attach to any valuation of an area such as Lista air base.
Strokovnjak je vztrajal pri dejstvu, da bo z vsako cenitvijo območja, kot je letalsko oporišče Lista, povezana precejšnja negotovost.
This can be explained by the following factors:
To je mogoče pojasniti z naslednjimi dejavniki:
the site is remote when compared with built-up areas with a measurable property market.
območje je oddaljeno, če se primerja s pozidanimi površinami z merljivim nepremičninskim trgom.
This affects not only land prices but also rental prices,
To ne vpliva samo na cene zemljišč, ampak tudi na najemnine,
the area comprises an air base on which military activities were conducted in the past.
območje obsega letalsko oporišče, v katerem so se v preteklosti opravljaje vojaške dejavnosti.
Few or no comparable reference properties exist, and
Primerljive referenčne nepremičnine ne obstajajo ali pa jih je zelo malo, ter
the land and the buildings are in considerable need of repair and maintenance.
na zemljišču in objektih je velika potreba po popravilu in vzdrževanju.
In light of the report of the independent expert, the Authority considers that the air base was sold at market value.
Na podlagi poročila neodvisnega strokovnjaka Nadzorni organ meni, da je bilo letalsko oporišče prodano po tržni vrednosti.
In the first place, the actual sale price matched the assessment of the market value given in the Verditakst report.
Prvič, dejanska prodajna cena je bila enaka oceni tržne vrednosti, ki je navedena v Verditakstovem poročilu.
The fact that OPAK’s assessment of the market value was considerably higher does not as such provide grounds for concluding that there had been State aid [14].Indeed, the expert appointed by the Authority points, as mentioned above, to several factors that indicate that OPAK’s market value assessment was too high and that the criteria applied by Verditakst were more correct than those applied by OPAK.
Samo dejstvo, da je bila OPAK-ova ocena tržne vrednosti znatno višja, ni razlog za sklepanje, da je šlo za državno pomoč [14].Kot je navedeno zgoraj, strokovnjak, ki ga je imenoval Nadzorni organ, opozarja na več dejavnikov, ki kažejo, da je bila OPAK-ova ocena tržne vrednosti previsoka in da so bila merila, ki jih je uporabil Verditakst, bolj pravilna od meril, ki jih je uporabil OPAK.
The Authority concurs with the view that the property market at Lista is atypical and difficult to assess and, as noted by Mr Saastad, that considerable uncertainty will attach to any valuation of an area such as the Lista air base.
Nadzorni organ se strinja s stališčem, da nepremičninski trg v Listi ni tipičen in da ga je težko oceniti, in kakor je opozoril g. Saastad, da bo z vsako cenitvijo območja, kot je letalsko oporišče Lista, povezana precejšnja negotovost.
Indeed the variance in the two valuations made in 2002 would appear to support the uncertainty relating to the market there.
Zdi se, da odstopanje obeh cenitev, izdelanih leta 2002, podpira negotovost v zvezi s tamkajšnjim trgom.
It is also true that not only was the NDEA unable to sell plots of the land, also Lista Flypark AS has, since it bought the property in 2002, had limited success in selling plots of land to business start-ups.
Res je tudi, da ne samo, da NDEA ni mogla prodati zemljišča, tudi podjetje Lista Flypark AS je bilo od leta 2002, ko je kupilo nepremičnino, le delno uspešno pri prodaji zemljišča podjetjem v začetni fazi poslovanja.
The low market value of the air base is further confirmed by the length and the difficulty of the sales process itself, which lasted from 1997 until 2002.
Nizko tržno vrednost letalskega oporišča potrjuje tudi dolžina in težavnost procesa prodaje, ki je trajal od leta 1997 do leta 2002.
The final element in the price paid is the value attributed to certain costs, which was deducted from the value of the property to obtain the final price.
Končni element v plačani ceni je vrednost, pripisana nekaterim stroškom, ki je bila odšteta od vrednosti nepremičnine, da je bila določena končna cena.
Section 2.2 of the State Aid Guidelines on State aid elements in sales of land and buildings by public authorities specifically foresees that ‘special obligations that relate to the land and buildings and not to the purchaser or his economic activities may be attached to the sale’.
Oddelek 2.2 Smernic o državni pomoči o elementih državne pomoči pri prodaji zemljišč in objektov s strani javnih oblasti posebej predvideva, da „se prodaji v javnem interesu lahko dodajo posebne obveznosti, povezane z zemljišči in objekti, ne pa s kupcem ali njegovimi gospodarskimi dejavnostmi“.
The economic disadvantage of such obligations may be set off against the purchase price.
Gospodarske slabosti takih obveznosti se lahko uporabijo za znižanje prodajne cene.
In relation to these obligations, the expert notes that the amounts are not unreasonably high, given the area to which they relate, and that it is not unusual for the value of these obligations to exceed the value of the property itself.
V zvezi s temi obveznostmi strokovnjak poudarja, da zneski niso nerazumno visoki, ob upoštevanju območja, na katero se nanašajo in da ni neobičajno, da vrednost teh obveznosti presega vrednost nepremičnine same.
While the procedure for transfer of funds is characterised as ‘highly unusual’, the Authority considers that this does not affect the assessment of the value of the obligations themselves.
Medtem, ko je prenos sredstev označen kot „zelo nenavaden“, pa Nadzorni organ meni, da to ne vpliva na oceno vrednosti obveznosti samih.
In light of the foregoing considerations, and coupled with the fact that a property burdened with pre-emption rights or options to buy will be difficult to sell, the Authority takes the view that, as regards the sale of the air base, it is not established that state resources were involved and that State aid was present.
Glede na zgornje navedbe in dejstvo, da je nepremičnino, ki je obremenjena s predkupnimi pravicami ali možnostmi nakupa, težko prodati, Nadzorni organ meni, da glede prodaje letalskega oporišča ni ugotovljeno, da so bila uporabljena državna sredstva in da je bila prisotna državna pomoč.
On the basis of the foregoing assessment, the Authority considers that the sale of the Lista air base does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) EEA,
Na podlagi zgornje ocene Nadzorni organ meni, da prodaja letalskega oporišča Lista ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP –
The procedure initiated pursuant to Article 4(4), read in conjunction with Article 13, of Part II of Protocol 3 concerning the lease of Lista air base is hereby closed.
Postopek, sprožen v skladu s členom 4(4) v povezavi s členom 13 dela II Protokola 3, glede zakupa letalskega oporišča Lista je končan.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the sale of the Lista air base did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61 EEA.
Nadzorni organ Efte meni, da prodaja letalskega oporišča Lista ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP.
Hereinafter referred to as ‘the Authority’.
V nadaljnjem besedilu Nadzorni organ.
Hereinafter referred to as ‘the EEA Agreement’.
V nadaljnjem besedilu Sporazum EGP.
Hereinafter referred to as ‘the Surveillance and Court Agreement’.
V nadaljnjem besedilu Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
Hereinafter referred to as ‘Protocol 3’.
V nadaljnjem besedilu Protokol 3.