natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reaffirms once again that Parliament's governing bodies and administration are held accountable for the resources placed at Parliament's disposal throughout the discharge and that it is therefore essential for the entire decision-making procedure to take place in a completely transparent manner to ensure that Union citizens are provided with a true and accurate view of the way that Parliament takes its decisions and uses the resources placed at its disposal;
znova poudarja, da so vodstveni organi in uprava Parlamenta v postopku razrešnice poklicani na odgovornost za porabo sredstev, ki jih je Parlament imel na voljo, ter da je zato bistveno, da celoten postopek odločanja poteka na povsem pregleden način, da bo mogoče državljanom Unije posredovati resnične in točne informacije o tem, kako Parlament sprejema odločitve in uporablja sredstva, ki jih ima na voljo;
Criticises the fact that the Secretary-General has failed to answer a series of questions asked by Members; reiterates that the effective monitoring of the implementation of Parliament's budget has always called for and will continue to call for close cooperation between Parliament's administration and the Committee on Budgetary Control; calls, therefore, on the Secretary-General to complete the questionnaire by answering the following questions in writing:
izraža kritiko, ker generalni sekretar ni odgovoril na več vprašanj evropskih poslancev; znova poudarja, da je bilo učinkovito spremljanje izvrševanja proračuna Parlamenta vedno zaželeno, in se namerava še naprej zavzemati za tesno sodelovanje med upravo Parlamenta in Odborom za proračunski nadzor; zato poziva generalnega sekretarja, naj v celoti izpolni vprašalnik in pisno odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Strategic Execution Framework for the European Parliament
Strateški izvajalski okvir Evropskega parlamenta
When presenting the Strategic Execution Framework (SEF) for the European Parliament on 3 June 2014, the Secretary-General stated that the SEF is based on an academic theory developed at the Stanford School of Engineering in Palo Alto (California).
Ko je generalni sekretar 3. junija 2014 predstavil strateški izvajalski okvir Evropskega parlamenta, je omenil, da temelji na akademski teoriji, ki so jo razvili na Stanford School of Engineering v kalifornijskem Palu Altu.
Can the Secretary-General explain how Parliament came to choose this theory as the basis for the SEF?
Ali lahko generalni sekretar pojasni, zakaj je Parlament kot osnovo za strateški okvir izbral prav to teorijo?
Were other theories developed by other universities or specialist establishments, in particular in Europe, or other international institutions considered, studied and compared before Parliament opted for the Stanford theory?
Ali je Parlament preučil, primerjal in pretehtal tudi teorije drugih univerz ali posebnih ustanov, zlasti evropskih, oziroma drugih mednarodnih institucij, preden se je odločil za teorijo s Stanforda?
If so, why was the theory developed by the Stanford School of Engineering chosen?
Če je, zakaj je izbral prav teorijo, ki jo je razvil Stanford School of Engineering?
How was the decision taken, and by whom?
Kako je bila odločitev sprejeta in kdo jo je sprejel?
Can the Stanford theory be used free of charge, or is Parliament required to pay a fee of some kind?
Ali lahko Parlament teorijo s Stanforda uporablja brezplačno, ali pa mora zanjo plačati kak honorar?
If so, what is the fee involved?
Če ga mora, koliko znaša?
When the SEF was being developed, did Parliament staff have to undergo specific training at Stanford or any other academic institution?
Ali so se morali med pripravo strateškega izvajalskega okvira uslužbenci Parlamenta udeležiti posebnega usposabljanja na Stanfordu ali kaki drugi akademski ustanovi?
If so, which staff members (grades and posts) underwent training and how much did that training cost for each person?
Če so se morali, kateri uslužbenci (razred in delovno mesto) so to bili in koliko je to izobraževanje stalo na osebo?
Will further training be required in the future?
Ali bo v prihodnosti potrebno nadaljnje usposabljanje?
If so, how much will it cost?
Če bo, koliko bo stalo?
Are there plans to hold interdepartmental discussions or discussions with the Staff Committee and trade unions about the SEF?
Ali obstajajo načrti za razprave o strateškem izvajalskem okviru med posameznimi oddelki oziroma z odborom uslužbencev in s sindikati?
How and when will the SEF be implemented and what is the likely cost?
Kako in kdaj se bo strateški okvir začel izvajati in koliko naj bi to stalo?
In recent months the Secretary-General has submitted to the Bureau a series of strategic documents on the functioning of Parliament which will have a decisive bearing not only on administrative life, but also on Parliament's approach to EU lawmaking and policies.
V zadnjih mesecih je generalni sekretar predsedstvu predložil več strateških dokumentov o delovanju Parlamenta, ki ne bodo odločilni samo za delovanje uprave, temveč tudi za pristop Parlamenta k oblikovanju zakonodaje in politik EU.
Given these documents' importance for the organisation and future development of our work, why has no provision been made for a discussion and decision-making procedure which involves all the parties concerned, and not just Parliament's Bureau?
Ti dokumenti so zelo pomembni za organizacijo in prihodnost našega dela.
Resource Efficiency Measures Strategy
Zakaj torej ni bilo poskrbljeno za razpravo in odločanje, v katerem bi bile udeležene vse strani, ki jih to zadeva, ne samo predsedstvo Parlamenta?
Before the new time slots for meetings were proposed and introduced, was the impact of the changes on the organisation of Members' work assessed (restricted time slots for meetings, working meetings, meetings with organisations and members of the public, etc. outside official meetings)?
Strategija ukrepov za učinkovito rabo virov
Members of the European Parliament
Kako uspešna je enotna točka za parlamentarne storitve za poslance, ki deluje že nekaj mesecev?
Now that it has been operating for several months, how effective has the one-stop shop for the provision of parliamentary services to Members been?
Generalni direktorat za komuniciranje
Directorate-General for Communication
Komunikacijska strategija in priprava obveščevalne akcije za volitve 2014
Communication strategy and preparation of the information campaign for the 2014 elections
Evropska prireditev za mlade, ki je potekala maja 2014 v sklopu te akcije, je v Strasbourg privabila 5000 mladih.
The European Youth Event held in May 2014 as part of that campaign brought 5000 young people to Strasbourg.
Ali so bile med pripravami na prireditev ustrezno upoštevane gospodarske razmere v Evropi in stališče, ki bi ga mladi Evropejci utegnili imeti o denarju, porabljenem za organizacijo tako obsežnega dogodka?
When that event was being prepared, was due account taken of the economic situation in Europe and of the way in which the expenditure involved in holding an event on such a scale might be perceived by young Europeans?
Ali je koncept „UKREPAJ, SODELUJ, VPLIVAJ“ v splošnem obveljal za uspešnega?
Is the concept ‘ACT, REACT, IMPACT’ generally considered to be a success?
Kateri so kazalniki za merjenje uspeha tega koncepta?
What are the performance indicators to measure this success?
Kako se koncept uporablja po volitvah in ali je bilo po zakonodajni in vrednostni kampanji EP pripravljeno ocenjevalno poročilo?
How is the concept used after the elections and was any assessment/evaluation report made after the EP legislative and value campaigns?
Prosimo, da se Odboru za proračunski nadzor posreduje izvod te ocene.
Please provide the Committee on Budgetary Control with a copy of the evaluation.
Kakšna ocena je bila opravljena o večletnem programu nepovratnih sredstev v obdobju 2012–2014, katerega namen je bil ozaveščanje o vlogi Evropskega parlamenta, in ali je mogoče to oceno posredovati Odboru za proračunski nadzor?
What assessment/evaluation has been made of the multi-annual grants programme 2012-14 aimed at raising awareness on the role of the European Parliament and can such evaluations be made available to the Committee on Budgetary Control?
Akreditirani parlamentarni asistenti
Accredited Parliamentary Assistants (APAs)
Ali je bila učinkovitost novega orodja za zaposlovanje akreditiranih asistentov, APA-PEOPLE, uvedenega ob začetku parlamentarnega obdobja, že ocenjena?
Has the effectiveness of the recruitment tool for APAs, APA-PEOPLE, introduced at the start of the parliamentary term already been assessed?
Kaj je razlog, da so bili nekateri akreditirani parlamentarni asistentov na pomembne sezname prejemnikov e-pošte (Assistants 8th legislature, Bruxelles) dodani z večmesečno zamudo, tako da niso prejemali informacij o svojem delu?
What was the reason for a delay of several months for some APA to be included in the relevant mailing lists of EP (Assistants 8th legislature, Bruxelles) which has impeded them from receiving information concerning their work?
Ali so bili sprejeti kaki ukrepi?
Have some measures been taken?
Generalni direktorat za infrastrukturo in logistiko
Directorate-General for Infrastructure and Logistics
Gostinske storitve
Catering services
Kaj je razlog, da so cene v stavbi SQM za 25 % višje kot v menzi ASP, in ali to ni v navzkrižju z namero, da se stranke preusmeri iz prenatrpane menze ASP?
Would like to know the reason why the prices in the SQM building are 25 % more expensive than in the ASP canteen and wonders if this may hamper the intention to drive out customers from the overcrowded ASP canteen.
Generalni direktorat za varnost in zaščito
Directorate-General for Security and Safety
S kakšnimi ukrepi bi bilo mogoče povečati varnost po nedavnih vdorih, zlasti vdoru kurdskih protestnikov 7. oktobra 2014?
Which measures have been identified to increase security after recent breaches notably on 7 October 2014 by Kurdish protesters?
Ali bo novi koncept splošne varnosti posodobljen?
Will the New Global Security Concept be updated?
Ali je Parlament kupil elektronski sistem za prepoznavanje registrskih tablic avtomobilov?
Did Parliament acquire an electronic recognition system for car number plates?
Koliko je sistem stal?
What was the cost?
Ali je bil ta sistem nameščen na vhodih v garaže, da bo mogoče preverjati, ali registrska tablica ustreza podatkom na izkaznici za vstop?
Was this system installed and used at the entrances of the garage to check if the number plate corresponds with the information on the entry badge?
priporoča, da se zaradi večje preglednosti ter učinkovitejšega političnega in upravnega delovanja Parlamenta vse poslance, uslužbence Parlamenta in tudi splošno javnost sproti in nasploh obvešča o vseh dnevnih redih in zapisnikih sej, pa tudi o vseh odločitvah, ki jih sprejmejo parlamentarni organi odločanja; spominja, kako koristen je bil nekdanji odbor za poslovnik, kot pregleden in javen forum za razpravo in izboljšave regulativnega procesa in internih zadev Parlamenta; zato priporoča, da se ustanovi nevtralen odbor za poslovnik in interne zadeve, ki bo obravnaval tovrstna vprašanja, nato pa jih bo Parlament potrdil še na plenarnem zasedanju;
Recommends, in the interests of the greater transparency and effectiveness of Parliament's political and administrative activities, that all Members, Parliament staff and the general public be informed, immediately and generally, of all agendas and minutes of meetings and decisions taken by Parliament's decision-making bodies; recalls the usefulness of the old Committee on the Rules of Procedure as a forum for discussing and improving, in a transparent and public manner, both the regulatory process and Parliament's internal affairs; recommends in this regard the establishment of a neutral Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Internal Affairs to enable all these matters to be dealt with and subsequently legitimised by Parliament in plenary session;
je zelo zaskrbljen, ker je Parlament v letih 2013 in 2014 za promocijske dejavnosti, opisane kot institucionalna volilna kampanja, namenil 17800000 EUR, udeležba na evropskih volitvah leta 2014 pa se je ponovno zmanjšala, in sicer na 42,54 % (2009: 43 %); se zavzema za sprejetje nove strategije, ki bo usmerjena v povečanje privlačnosti evropskih volitev v državah članicah;
Is deeply worried that Parliament allocated EUR 17800000 to promotional activities described as institutional election campaign over the period 2013 to 2014 while turnout in the 2014 European elections declined again to 42,54 % (2009: 43 %); encourages the adoption of a new strategy aimed at increasing the attractiveness of the European elections in the Member States;
poudarja, da naj bi bila do junija 2015 opravljena zunanja naknadna ocena komunikacijske strategije za volitve 2014; prosi, da se Odbor za proračunski nadzor obvesti o datumu objave; pričakuje podrobno analizo sredstev v poročilu;
Emphasises that an external ex post evaluation report of the communication strategy for the 2014 elections is expected by June 2015; asks that the Committee on Budgetary Control be informed on the date of publication; expects a detailed analysis of the funds in the report;
ugotavlja, da je iz raziskave Eurobarometer o Evropskem parlamentu (EB/EP 82.5) razvidno, da je imelo 23 % vprašanih med volilno kampanjo leta 2014 negativno mnenje o Evropskem parlamentu, 43 % pa nevtralno mnenje; poudarja, da je na podlagi medijske analize mogoče sklepati, da je negativno mnenje pogosto povezano s finančno ureditvijo za poslance, torej nadomestili, plačami in proračunom Parlamenta na splošno; zato je prepričan, da so za izboljšanje podpore Parlamentu in zaupanja vanj potrebne strukturne izboljšave, na primer popolna preglednost nadomestil splošnih stroškov in odgovornost zanje;
Notes that the European Parliament Eurobarometer survey (EB/EP 82.5) shows that during the 2014 electoral campaign 23 % of the respondents had a very negative image of Parliament, while 43 % had a neutral image; points out that media analysis suggests that a negative image is often related to financial arrangements for Members such as allowances, salaries and the budget of Parliament in general; is convinced therefore that structural improvements, for example full transparency and the accounting of the general expenditure allowance, are needed to improve trust and support for Parliament;
ugotavlja, da bo na novo ustanovljeni generalni direktorat za parlamentarne raziskave zagotavljal akademsko svetovanje zlasti posameznim poslancem in bo tako dopolnjeval delo tematskih sektorjev, ki skrbijo za potrebe parlamentarnih teles;
Notes the establishment of the new Directorate-General for European Parliamentary Research which will provide independent academic advice, principally to individual Members, thereby supplementing the work of the policy departments which cater for the needs of parliamentary bodies;
pozdravlja ustanovitev službe za oceno učinka zakonodaje Unije; poziva, naj se ta služba osredotoči na dosežene kompromise Parlamenta ter spremembe predlogov Komisije; poziva, naj se do 30. oktobra 2015 izdela koncept takojšnje ocene zakonodaje in njenega učinka, da se služba bolje predstavi poslancem in da se razčlenijo skupni stroški; poziva k redni izmenjavi mnenja te službe z ustreznimi službami Komisije, Sveta in nacionalnih parlamentov;
Welcomes the setting-up of a unit to assess the impact of Union legislation; calls for this service to focus on the compromises negotiated by Parliament and Parliament's amendments to Commission proposals; calls for an approach to be developed to the prompt assessment of legislation and its impact, for the profile of the service to be raised among Members and for a breakdown of the overall costs to be provided by 30 October 2015; urges this service to hold regular exchanges of views with the corresponding services in the Commission, the Council and the national parliaments;
je seznanjen s sporazumom o sodelovanju med Ekonomsko-socialnim odborom, Odborom regij in Parlamentom, ki je bil končno podpisan 5. februarja 2014 in se je začel izvajati s prerazporeditvijo večjega števila zaposlenih iz obeh odborov v novo službo Evropskega parlamenta za raziskave (ERPS); meni, da je mogoče medinstitucionalno sodelovanje še izboljšati, in je prepričan, da bi združevanje virov in kupne moči na področjih, kjer institucije potrebujejo podobno pomoč, izboljšalo opravljanje storitev in zmanjšalo skupne stroške; upa, da bo izvajanje tega sporazuma služilo tem ciljem, da bo uravnoteženo in da bo enako koristilo vsem trem institucijam; vse tri institucije poziva, naj po enem letu sodelovanja pripravijo ločene ocene vpliva tega sporazuma tako z vidika človeških virov, odhodkov, sinergij, dodane vrednosti kot vsebin;
Notes the cooperation agreement between the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and Parliament, which was finally signed on 5 February 2014 and which began with a transfer of important staff from both committees to the new European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS); is of the opinion that effective interinstitutional cooperation should be improved and believes that pooling expertise and purchasing power in areas where the institutions require assistance of a similar nature should improve delivery and may reduce overall costs; hopes that the development of this agreement between the three institutions will achieve these objectives, be balanced and be of equal benefit to the three institutions; calls on each of these institutions, once this collaboration has been implemented for a year, to conduct an individual assessment of the impact of this agreement from the point of view of human resources, expenditure, synergies, added value and substance;
je seznanjen, da je bil ustanovljen generalni direktorat za varnost in zaščito; spominja, da je internalizacija storitev varovanja v Parlamentu v letu 2013 ustvarila prihranke v znesku 195000 EUR, v obdobju 2013–2016 pa naj bi ustvarila za več kot 11 milijonov EUR prihrankov; meni, da bi se bilo treba z belgijsko vlado pogajati o povečanju njenega prispevka za varnost Parlamenta, saj ima sama gospodarske koristi od navzočnosti evropskih institucij na svojem ozemlju; poziva, naj se oceni kakovost varnostne službe pred in po ustanovitvi generalnega direktorata za varnost in zaščito in naj se ta ocena do 30. septembra 2015 predloži Odboru za proračunski nadzor; vztraja, da bi bilo treba opraviti primerjalno študijo varnostnih sistemov preostalih institucij;
Takes note of the creation of Directorate-General for Security and Safety; recalls that the internalisation of Parliament's security services has generated savings of EUR 195000 in 2013 and is projected to produce savings of more than EUR 11 million over the period 2013-16; considers it appropriate to negotiate with the Belgian Government a greater contribution on its part to Parliament's security of, given that Belgium benefits economically from the presence of the Union institutions on its territory; calls for an evaluation of the quality of the security service before and after the creation of the Directorate-General for Security and Safety to be submitted to the Committee on Budgetary Control by 30 September 2015; insists that a comparative study of the security systems of other institutions be carried out;
ponovno poudarja, da je treba varnost parlamentarnih stavb in njihove najbližje okolice obravnavati kot največjo prednostno nalogo; zahteva, da se v sklopu tega dela izboljša tudi varovanje parkirišč;
Reiterates that maintaining the security of Parliament's buildings and their immediate surroundings must be given the highest priority; requests that as a part of this work, security in the car parks should be improved;
je zaskrbljen zaradi neravnotežja med spoloma v upravi, kjer je bilo na dan 31. decembra 2013 med vodji oddelkov 29 % žensk, med direktorji 34 % in med generalnimi direktorji 33 %; poziva k uvedbi načrta enakih možnosti, zlasti v zvezi z vodstvenimi položaji, da bi to neravnovesje čim prej odpravili;
Is concerned about the lack of parity in the administration, whereby women accounted for 29 % of heads of unit, 34 % of directors and 33 % of Directors-General as of 31 December 2013; calls for the implementation of an equal opportunities plan, especially with regard to management positions, in order to remedy this imbalance as soon as possible;
poziva k ravnotežju glede držav izvora med visokimi uradniki v upravi Parlamenta; pričakuje, da se do konca leta 2015 izda poročilo o napredku pri doseganju tega cilja;
Calls for a balance as regards the country of origin to be sought among senior officials of Parliament's administration; expects a report setting out the progress made towards achieving this objective to be drawn up by the end of 2015;
poziva, da se do konca leta 2015 pripravi letna razčlenitev gibanja števila in stroškov zaposlenih od leta 2000, pri tem pa razlikuje med plačnimi razredi in vodstveno ravnijo; poziva upravo Parlamenta, naj navede, ali bi lahko iz primerljivih študij uprav mednarodnih parlamentarnih skupščin izpeljala pomembne zaključke za svoje delo; ugotavlja, da bi morala poročila zajemati tudi delo, oddano v zunanje izvajanje specialistom, da bi spodbudili duh preglednosti in obenem delovali v interesu volilcev; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je veliko število zaposlenih, kar 35, v uradu predsednika Parlamenta, vključno z dvema voznikoma in osebnim slugo, zelo vprašljivo in slab zgled za zmanjševanje stroškov in proračunsko odgovornost v Parlamentu;
Asks to be provided, by the end of 2015, with year-on-year breakdowns of trends in staffing levels and staff costs, by grade and level of management; asks Parliament's administration to state whether comparable studies of the administrations of international parliamentary assemblies could contain important lessons for Parliament's work; notes that work outsourced to specialists should also be included in the reports to promote the ethos of transparency, while also serving the best interests of constituents; notes with concern that the large number of staff based in the office of the President of the European Parliament, which amounts to 35 staff, including two drivers and a personal usher, is highly questionable and that this sets a bad example for cost reduction and fiscal responsibility within Parliament;
je seznanjen, da je predsedstvo 15. aprila 2013 sprejelo izvedbena pravila za kodeks ravnanja poslancev; je vseeno zaskrbljen zaradi neizvajanja in razlik pri razlagi, o čemer poroča koalicija nevladnih organizacij [1], ter poziva k okrepitvi položaja svetovalnega odbora, in sicer tako, da se mu zagotovi pravica do pobude za začetek naključnih preverjanj izjav o interesih, ki jih predložijo poslanci;
Notes that the implementing measures for the Code of Conduct for Members were adopted by the Bureau on 15 April 2013; is concerned, however, by the lack of implementation and the differences of interpretation as reported by a coalition of NGOs [1] and calls for a strengthening of the position of the Advisory Committee by providing it with a right of initiative to start random checks of the declarations of interests provided by Members;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da morajo poslanci posredovati več informacij o dejavnostih, ki jih opravljajo sočasno z javno funkcijo; vseeno opozarja, da poslanci, podobno kot poslanci nacionalnih parlamentov, nimajo ekskluzivnega mandata in lahko zato opravljajo druge poklicne dejavnosti; meni, da bi podrobnejši obrazec za izjavo o interesih poslancev prispeval k večji preglednosti in preprečil morebitna navzkrižja interesov; zahteva, da generalni sekretar oblikuje javno zbirko podatkov, ki bo dostopna prek spletnega mesta Parlamenta, o vseh dejavnostih poslancev, ki jih opravljajo sočasno z javno funkcijo;