natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, in the latter case, aid has an incentive effect if it incentivises the realisation of the investment long before the standard enters into force.
naknadno opremljanje obstoječih prevoznih sredstev za cestni in železniški prevoz ter prevoz po celinskih plovnih poteh in pomorski prevoz, če standardi Unije na dan začetka obratovanja teh prevoznih sredstev še niso veljali in če se ti standardi, potem ko začnejo veljati, ne uporabljajo za ta prevozna sredstva.
Aid granted for the adaptation to Union standards already adopted but not yet in force will be considered to have incentive effect if the investment is implemented and finalised at least one year before the Union standards enter into force.
Nadzorni organ meni, da pomoč za naložbe, ki upravičencu omogočajo sprejeti ukrepe, ki presegajo veljavne standarde Unije, pozitivno prispeva k okoljskemu ali energetskemu cilju.
As a further exception to paragraph 48, an incentive effect may exist if aid is granted for:
Da pogodbenice ne bi bile odvrnjene od določitve obveznih nacionalnih standardov, ki so strožji od ustreznih standardov Unije, takšen pozitiven prispevek obstaja ne glede na obstoj obveznih nacionalnih standardov, ki so strožji od standardov Unije.
the acquisition of new transport vehicles for road, railway, inland waterway and maritime transport complying with adopted Union standards, provided that the acquisition occurs before those standards enter into force and that, once mandatory, they do not apply to vehicles already purchased; or
To na primer vključuje ukrepe za izboljšanje kakovosti vode in zraka, ki presegajo obvezne standarde Unije.
retrofitting operations of existing transport vehicles for road, railway, inland waterway and maritime transport, provided that the Union standards were not yet in force at the date of entry into operation of those vehicles and that, once mandatory, they do not apply to those vehicles.
Takšen pozitiven prispevek obstaja tudi, če je bil v primeru neobstoja standardov Unije sprejet obvezen nacionalni standard.
The Authority considers that aid in support of investments that enable the beneficiary to take measures that go beyond the applicable Union standards contributes positively to the environmental or energy objective.
Spodbujevalni učinek in energetski pregledi
In order not to discourage Contracting Parties from setting mandatory national standards which are more stringent than the corresponding Union standards, such positive contribution exists irrespective of the presence of mandatory national standards that are more stringent than the Union standard.
V skladu z Direktivo 2012/27/EU (v nadaljnjem besedilu: direktiva o energetski učinkovitosti ali EED) morajo velika podjetja vsaka štiri leta opraviti energetski pregled.
This includes for instance measures to improve the water and air quality beyond mandatory Union standards.
Pomoč za energetske preglede za velika podjetja ima torej lahko spodbujevalni učinek le, če se s pomočjo ne krije energetski pregled, ki se zahteva v skladu z direktivo o energetski učinkovitosti.
Such positive contribution also exists in the presence of a mandatory national standard adopted in the absence of Union standards.
Ker ta obveznost ne velja za MSP, ima državna pomoč, dodeljena MSP za izvajanje energetskega pregleda, lahko spodbujevalni učinek.
Incentive effect and energy audits
Prejšnji odstavek ne posega v oceno spodbujevalnega učinka državne pomoči pri ukrepih za energetsko učinkovitost, ki so predpisani ali se izvajajo zaradi energetskega pregleda, ali ukrepih, ki izhajajo iz drugih orodij, kot so sistemi upravljanja z energijo in sistemi ravnanja z okoljem.
Under the Directive 2012/27/EU (‘the Energy Efficiency Directive’ or ‘the EED’), large enterprises have to carry out energy audits every four years.
Pri ukrepih, ki jih je treba priglasiti posamično, morajo pogodbenice Nadzornemu organu v celoti dokazati spodbujevalni učinek pomoči.
Therefore aid for energy audits for large enterprises can have an incentive effect only to the extent that the aid does not compensate an energy audit required by the EED.
Predložiti morajo jasne dokaze, da pomoč dejansko vpliva na odločitev za naložbo tako, da se ravnanje upravičenca spremeni, pri čemer upravičenec zviša raven varstva okolja ali pa se izboljša delovanje evropskega trga z energijo.
As the same obligation is not imposed on SMEs, State aid granted to SMEs for carrying out the energy audit can have an incentive effect.
Pogodbenica mora za celovito oceno predložiti ne le informacije v zvezi s projektom, ki prejme pomoč, ampak tudi celovit opis obratnega hipotetičnega scenarija, po katerem upravičencu nobena pogodbenica ne odobri pomoči.
The previous paragraph is without prejudice to the assessment of the incentive effect of State aid for energy-efficiency measures prescribed by or carried out as a result of the energy audit or those resulting from other tools, such as energy management systems and environmental management systems.
Koristi novih naložb ali proizvodnih metod običajno niso omejene na njihove neposredne okoljske učinke ali učinke na trg z energijo.
For measures subject to individual notification, the Contracting Parties must fully demonstrate to the Authority the incentive effect of the aid.
Takšne koristi so lahko zlasti proizvodne ugodnosti [37], medtem ko so tveganja povezana zlasti z negotovostjo, ali bodo naložbe tako donosne, kot se pričakuje.
They need to provide clear evidence that the aid has an effective impact on the investment decision in a way that it changes the behaviour of the beneficiary leading the beneficiary to increase the level of environmental protection or leading to a better functioning of the European energy market.
Spodbujevalni učinek se načeloma ugotavlja na podlagi analize obratnih hipotetičnih scenarijev, pri kateri se primerjajo ravni načrtovanih dejavnosti s pomočjo in brez nje.
To allow a comprehensive assessment, the Contracting Party must provide not only information concerning the aided project but also a comprehensive description of the counterfactual scenario, in which none of the Contracting Parties award aid to the beneficiary.
To v bistvu pomeni preverjanje donosnosti projekta brez pomoči, da se oceni, ali dejansko ne dosega dobička, ki bi ga podjetje pridobilo z izvajanjem nadomestnega projekta.
The advantages of new investments or production methods are usually not limited to their direct environmental effects or effects on the energy market.
V zvezi s tem se lahko raven donosnosti oceni z uporabo metodologij, ki so ustaljene v zadevni industriji in ki lahko vključujejo metode za ocenjevanje neto sedanje vrednosti projekta [38], notranje stopnje donosa [39] ali povprečnega donosa na vložena sredstva.
Such advantages may in particular be production advantages [37] while the risks relate particularly to the uncertainty about whether the investment will be as productive as expected.
Donosnost projekta je treba primerjati z običajnimi stopnjami donosa podjetja pri drugih podobnih naložbenih projektih.
The incentive effect is, in principle, to be identified through the counterfactual scenario analysis, comparing the levels of intended activity with aid and without aid.
Če te stopnje niso na voljo, se donosnost projekta primerja s stroški kapitala celotnega podjetja ali stopnjami donosa, ki so običajne v zadevnem sektorju.
Essentially, that amounts to checking the profitability of the project in the absence of the aid, to assess whether it indeed falls short of the profit obtained by the company by implementing the alternative project.
Kadar ni znan noben obratni hipotetični scenarij, se lahko spodbujevalni učinek predpostavlja v primeru likvidnostne vrzeli, tj. kadar stroški naložbe presegajo neto sedanjo vrednost pričakovanega poslovnega dobička naložbe na podlagi predhodnega poslovnega načrta.
In that context, the level of profitability can be evaluated by reference to methodologies which are standard practice in the particular industry concerned, and which may include methods to evaluate the net present value (‘NPV’) of the project [38], the internal rate of return ( ‘IRR’) [39] or the average return on capital employed ( ‘ROCE’).
Pogodbenice so zlasti pozvane, naj se sklicujejo na sodobne, upoštevne in verodostojne dokaze, ki na primer vključujejo uradne dokumente upravnega odbora, poročila kreditnega odbora, ocene tveganja, finančna poročila, notranje poslovne načrte, strokovna mnenja in druge študije, povezane z ocenjevanim naložbenim projektom.
The profitability of the project is to be compared with normal rates of return applied by the company in other investment projects of a similar kind.
Dokumenti, ki vsebujejo informacije o napovedih povpraševanja in stroškov ter finančnih napovedih, dokumenti, ki so predloženi odboru za naložbe in podrobno opisujejo različne naložbene scenarije, ali dokumenti, ki so predloženi finančnim institucijam, lahko pomagajo pri preverjanju spodbujevalnega učinka.
Where those rates are not available, the profitability of the project is to be compared with the cost of capital of the company as a whole or with the rates of return commonly observed in the industry concerned.
Za zagotovitev, da je spodbujevalni učinek ugotovljen na objektivni podlagi, lahko Nadzorni organ v svoji oceni spodbujevalnega učinka primerja podatke za podjetje s podatki za sektor, v katerem je podjetje dejavno, kar se imenuje primerjalna analiza.
Where no specific counterfactual scenario is known, the incentive effect can be assumed when there is a funding gap, that is to say when the investment costs exceed the NPV of the expected operating profits of the investment on the basis of an ex ante business plan.
Zlasti bi morala pogodbenica po možnosti zagotoviti sektorske podatke, ki dokazujejo, da so obratni hipotetični scenarij podjetja, zahtevana raven donosnosti in pričakovani denarni tokovi razumni.
The Contracting Parties are, in particular, invited to rely on contemporary, relevant and credible evidence including, for example official board documents, credit committee reports, risk assessments financial reports, internal business plans, expert opinions and other studies related to the investment project under assessment.
Nadzorni organ lahko ugotovi, da spodbujevalni učinek obstaja, kadar je podjetju v interesu, da izvede projekt s pomočjo, čeprav projekt, ki prejme pomoč, ne dosega običajno zahtevane ravni donosnosti.
Documents containing information on demand forecasts, cost forecasts, financial forecasts, documents that are submitted to an investment committee and that elaborate on various investment scenarios, or documents provided to the financial institutions could help to verify the incentive effect.
To bi lahko bilo na primer upravičeno glede na splošnejše koristi, ki niso upoštevane v sami donosnosti projekta.
In order to ensure that the incentive effect is established on an objective basis, the Authority may in its assessment of the incentive effect compare company-specific data with data concerning the industry in which the company is active, known as benchmarking.
V takšnih okoliščinah je zlasti pomembno, da se zagotovijo dokazi v podporo obstoju spodbujevalnega učinka.
In particular, the Contracting Party should where possible provide industry-specific data demonstrating that the company's counterfactual scenario, its required level of profitability and its expected cash-flows are reasonable.
Če se podjetje prilagaja nacionalnemu standardu, ki presega standarde Unije ali ki je bil sprejet v primeru neobstoja standardov Unije, bo Nadzorni organ preveril, ali bi bil upravičenec do pomoči bistveno prizadet zaradi višjih stroškov in ne bi bil sposoben kriti stroškov, povezanih s takojšnjim izvajanjem nacionalnih standardov.
The Authority may find that there is an incentive effect in cases where an undertaking may have an incentive in carrying out a project, with aid, even if the aided project does not achieve the normally required level of profitability.
Pri naložbah, s katerimi podjetja presegajo najnižje stopnje, ki jih določajo standardi Unije, je mogoče, da Nadzorni organ kljub temu ne ugotovi spodbujevalnega učinka, zlasti če takšne naložbe ustrezajo minimalnim tehničnim standardom, ki so na voljo na trgu.
This might be justified for example in view of wider benefits not reflected in the profitability of the project itself.
Če pomoč ne povzroči spremembe ravnanja upravičenca s spodbujanjem dodatnih dejavnosti, takšna pomoč nima spodbujevalnega učinka v smislu spodbujanja ravnanja, usmerjenega v varstvo okolja, v EGP ali krepitve delovanja evropskega trga z energijo.
In such circumstances, the evidence provided to support the existence of an incentive effect becomes particularly important.
Zato pomoč ne bo odobrena, kadar se zdi, da bi bilo mogoče enake dejavnosti izvajati brez pomoči.
Where an undertaking is adapting to a national standard going beyond Union standards or adopted in the absence of Union standards, the Authority will verify that the aid beneficiary would have been affected substantially in terms of increased costs and would not have been able to bear the costs associated with the immediate implementation of national standards.
Sorazmernost pomoči
For investments that bring undertakings above the minimum levels required by Union standards, the Authority can still find no incentive effect, in particular if such investments correspond to the minimum technical standards available in the market.
Okoljska in energetska pomoč se štejeta za sorazmerni, če je znesek pomoči na upravičenca omejen na najmanjši potreben znesek za dosego želene ravni varstva okolja ali energetskega cilja.
If the aid does not change the behaviour of the beneficiary by stimulating additional activities, that aid does not have incentive effect in terms of promoting environmental behaviour in the EEA or strengthening the functioning of the European energy market.
Splošno pravilo je, da se pomoč šteje za omejeno na najmanjšo potrebno, če znesek pomoči ustreza neto dodatnim stroškom, potrebnim za izpolnitev cilja, glede na obratni hipotetični scenarij brez pomoči.
Therefore, aid will not be approved in cases where it appears that the same activities would still be pursued without the aid.
Neto dodatni stroški so določeni na podlagi razlike med gospodarskimi koristmi in stroški (vključno z naložbami in poslovanjem) projekta, ki prejme pomoč, ter koristmi in stroški nadomestnega naložbenega projekta, ki bi ga družba izvajala, če pomoči ne bi prejela, tj. obratni hipotetični scenarij.
Proportionality of the aid
Vendar je včasih težko v celoti upoštevati vse gospodarske koristi, ki jih podjetje pridobi od dodatne naložbe [40].
Environmental and energy aid is considered to be proportionate if the aid amount per beneficiary is limited to the minimum needed to achieve the environmental protection or energy objective aimed for.
Zato se lahko za ukrepe, ki niso predmet posamezne ocene, uporabi poenostavljena metoda, ki se osredotoča na izračun dodatnih naložbenih stroškov ter ne upošteva koristi in stroškov poslovanja.
As a general principle, aid will be considered to be limited to the minimum necessary if the aid corresponds to the net extra cost necessary to meet the objective, compared to the counterfactual scenario in the absence of aid.
Ukrepi, ki niso predmet posamezne ocene, se bodo šteli za sorazmerne, če znesek pomoči ne presega največje intenzivnosti pomoči, tj. določenega odstotka upravičenih stroškov, kot so opredeljeni v odstavkih 67 do 71.
The net extra cost is determined by the difference between the economic benefits and costs (including the investment and operation) of the aided project and those of the alternative investment project which the company would carry out in the absence of aid, that is the counterfactual scenario.
Te največje intenzivnosti pomoči se uporabljajo tudi kot omejitev pomoči, ki se zagotavlja za ukrepe, ki jih je treba priglasiti.
However, it might be difficult to fully take into account all economic benefits that a company will derive from an additional investment [40].
Upravičeni stroški
Therefore, for measures, which are not subject to an individual assessment, a simplified method that would focus on calculating the extra investment costs, that is to say not taking into account the operating benefits and costs may be used.
Upravičeni stroški za okoljsko pomoč so dodatni stroški naložbe v opredmetena in/ali neopredmetena sredstva, ki so neposredno povezani z doseganjem skupnega cilja.
Measures which are not subject to an individual assessment will be deemed proportional if the aid amount does not exceed the maximum aid intensity, that is a given percentage of the eligible costs as defined in paragraphs 67 to 71.
Upravičeni stroški so določeni na naslednji način:
Those maximum aid intensities also serve as a cap to the aid given for notifiable measures.
kadar je mogoče stroške doseganja cilja skupnega interesa določiti v skupnih naložbenih stroških kot ločeno naložbo, na primer, ker je zeleni element zlahka določljiva „dodatna komponenta“ že obstoječe zmogljivosti, stroški ločene naložbe pomenijo upravičene stroške [41];
Eligible costs
v vseh drugih primerih so upravičeni stroški dodatni stroški naložb, določeni s primerjavo naložbe, za katero se prejme pomoč, in obratnih hipotetičnih razmer brez državne pomoči.
The eligible costs for environmental aid are the extra investment costs in tangible and/or in intangible assets which are directly linked to the achievement of the common objective.
Načeloma se je mogoče sklicevati na stroške tehnično primerljive naložbe [42], ki bi bila verodostojno izvedena brez pomoči [43] in ki ne dosega cilja skupnega interesa ali ga dosega le v manjšem obsegu.
The eligible costs are determined as follows:
Priloga 2 vsebuje seznam ustreznih obratnih hipotetičnih scenarijev ali izračunov upravičenih stroškov, ki ustrezajo obratnim hipotetičnim scenarijem, ki jih je treba uporabiti v takih primerih.
where the costs of achieving the common interest objective can be identified in the total investment costs as a separate investment, for instance, because the green element is a readily identifiable ‘add-on component’ to a pre-existing facility, the costs of the separate investment constitute the eligible costs [41];
Nadzorni organ lahko sprejme nadomestne obratne hipotetične scenarije, če jih pogodbenica ustrezno utemelji.
in all other cases, the eligible costs are the extra investment costs established by comparing the aided investment with the counterfactual situation in the absence of State aid.
Pri ukrepih, ki podpirajo integrirane projekte, kot so integrirani ukrepi za energetsko učinkovitost, ali projekte, povezane z bioplinom, je včasih težko opredeliti obratni hipotetični scenarij.
In principle, reference can be made to the cost of a technically comparable investment [42] that would credibly be realised without aid [43] and which does not achieve the common interest objective or that only attains that objective to a lesser degree.
Kadar obratnega hipotetičnega scenarija ni mogoče verodostojno opredeliti, je Nadzorni organ pripravljen kot upravičene stroške obravnavati celotne stroške projekta, kar lahko pomeni nižje intenzivnosti pomoči, da se upošteva drugačen izračun upravičenih stroškov.
Annex 2 contains a list of the relevant counterfactual scenarios or eligible cost calculations reflecting the counterfactual scenario that should be used in similar cases.
Pravila iz odstavkov 68 do 70 se uporabljajo za gradnjo proizvodnih obratov v okviru projektov v zvezi z energetsko učinkovitimi sistemi daljinskega ogrevanja ali hlajenja.
The Authority may accept alternative counterfactual situations if duly justified by the Contracting Party.
Pri pomoči za gradnjo omrežja pa se bo uporabljal pristop likvidnostne vrzeli, podobno kot pri ocenjevanju energetske infrastrukture.
For measures supporting integrated projects such as integrated energy-efficiency measures, or biogas projects, the counterfactual scenario can be difficult to establish.
Največje intenzivnosti pomoči
Where a counterfactual scenario cannot credibly be established, the Authority is amenable to consider the total costs of a project as an alternative, which may imply lower aid intensities to reflect the different eligible cost calculation.
Da se zagotovijo predvidljivost in enaki konkurenčni pogoji, Nadzorni organ uporablja največje intenzivnosti pomoči za pomoč iz Priloge 1.
The rules set out in paragraphs 68 to 70 are applicable to the construction of the production plants in energy efficient district heating or cooling projects.
Te intenzivnosti pomoči izražajo potrebo po posredovanju države, po eni strani ugotovljeno na podlagi pomembnosti nedelovanja trga in po drugi strani na podlagi pričakovane ravni izkrivljanja konkurence in trgovine.
However, the funding gap approach will be applied for aid to the construction of the network, similar to the assessment of energy infrastructure.
Večje intenzivnosti pomoči so lahko dovolijo za nekatere vrste pomoči ali za naložbe na območju, ki prejema pomoč, vendar intenzivnost pomoči ne sme nikoli presegati 100 % upravičenih stroškov.
Maximum aid intensities
Večje intenzivnosti pomoči se lahko dovolijo v naslednjih primerih:
In order to ensure predictability and a level playing field, the Authority applies maximum aid intensities for aid, set out in Annex 1.
intenzivnost pomoči se lahko poveča za 15 odstotnih točk za energetske in okoljske naložbe na območjih, ki prejemajo pomoč in izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 61(3)(a) Sporazuma EGP, ter za 5 odstotnih točk za energetske in okoljske naložbe na območjih, ki prejemajo pomoč in izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 61(3)(c) Sporazuma EGP.
These aid intensities reflect the need for State intervention determined, on the one hand, by the relevance of the market failure and, on the other hand, by the expected level of distortion of competition and trade.
Nadzorni organ ocenjuje, da so ta zvišanja upravičena zaradi različnih ovir, s katerimi se srečujejo ta območja in ki lahko otežujejo okoljske ali energetske naložbe;
Higher aid intensities may be allowed for some types of aid or for investments located in an assisted area, but the aid intensity can never exceed 100 % of eligible costs.
intenzivnost pomoči se lahko poveča za 10 odstotnih točk za srednja podjetja in 20 odstotnih točk za mala podjetja.
Higher aid intensities may be allowed as follows:
Za mala in srednja podjetja, ki se lahko na eni strani srečujejo s sorazmerno višjimi stroški pri doseganju okoljskih ali energetskih ciljev glede na obseg njihove dejavnosti in na drugi strani s pomanjkljivostmi kapitalskega trga, zaradi katerih morajo kriti take stroške, so lahko upravičene tudi večje intenzivnosti pomoči, ker je tveganje za resno izkrivljanje konkurence in trgovine manjše, če je upravičenec malo ali srednje podjetje;
the aid intensity may be increased by 15 percentage points for energy and environmental investments located in assisted areas fulfilling the conditions of Article 61(3)(a) of the EEA Agreement and by 5 percentage points for energy and environmental investments located in assisted areas fulfilling the conditions of Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement.
večje intenzivnosti pomoči so lahko pod določenimi pogoji upravičene v primeru ekoinovacij, s katerimi se lahko odpravlja dvojno nedelovanje trga, povezano z večjimi tveganji zaradi inovacij in okoljskim vidikom projekta.
The Authority deems those increases to be justified in view of the various handicaps faced by these areas that might be an obstacle to environmental or energy investments;
To velja zlasti za ukrepe za učinkovito rabo virov.
the aid intensity can be increased by 10 percentage points for medium-sized enterprises and 20 percentage points for small enterprises.
Intenzivnost pomoči se lahko poveča za 10 odstotnih točk, če so izpolnjeni naslednji kumulativni pogoji: