natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In such cases it is sufficient to describe in the agreement the general nature of the know-how and to list the employees that will be or have been involved in passing it on to the licensee.
Obveznost pridobitelja licence, da uporablja znamko dajalca licence, lahko prav tako spodbuja razširjanje tehnologije, s tem ko dajalcu licence omogoča, da se predstavi kot vir osnovne tehnologije.
Provisions in technology transfer agreements relating to the purchase of products by the licensee are only covered by the TTBER if, and to the extent that, those provisions are directly related to the production or sale of the contract products.
TTBER zajema sporazume o prenosu tehnologije iz tega scenarija, tudi če je glavni interes pogodbenic izkoriščanje znamke in ne tehnologije [37].
Therefore the TTBER does not apply to those parts of a technology transfer agreement relating to input and/or equipment that are used for other purposes than the production of the contract products.
TTBER ne zajema podeljevanja licence za avtorske pravice razen avtorskih pravic na programski opremi (z izjemo situacije iz točke 47).
For instance, where milk is sold together with licensing of technology to produce cheese, only the milk used for the production of cheese with the licensed technology will be covered by the TTBER.
Toda Nadzorni organ bo pri presoji podeljevanja licence za avtorske pravice za proizvodnjo pogodbenih izdelkov na podlagi člena 53 Sporazuma EGP praviloma uporabljal načela, določena v TTBER in teh smernicah.
Provisions in technology transfer agreements relating to the licensing of other types of intellectual property such as trademarks and copyright, other than software copyright (on software copyright see points (44) and (62)), are only covered by the TTBER if, and to the extent that, they are directly related to the production or sale of the contract products.
Po drugi strani se šteje, da podeljevanje licence za pravice dajanja v najem ter pravice javnega izvajanja avtorsko zaščitenih del, zlasti filmov in glasbe, sproža posebna vprašanja in ni zagotovila, da bo presoja takih licenčnih sporazumov na podlagi načel, razvitih v teh smernicah, primerna.
This condition ensures that provisions covering other types of intellectual property rights are block-exempted to the extent that these other intellectual property rights serve to enable the licensee to better exploit the licensed technology rights.
Pri uporabi člena 53 je treba upoštevati posebnosti dela in način njegovega izkoriščanja [38].
For instance, where a licensor authorises a licensee to use its trademark on the products incorporating the licensed technology, this trademark licence may allow the licensee to better exploit the licensed technology by allowing consumers to make an immediate link between the product and the characteristics imputed to it by the licensed technology rights.
Nadzorni organ zato TTBER in teh smernic ne bo uporabljal po analogiji za podeljevanje licence za te druge pravice.
An obligation on the licensee to use the licensor's trademark may also promote the dissemination of technology by allowing the licensor to identify itself as the source of the underlying technology.
Nadzorni organ prav tako ne bo razširil načel, razvitih v TTBER in teh smernicah, na licenciranje znamk (z izjemo situacije iz točke 47).
The TTBER covers technology transfer agreements in this scenario even if the principal interest of the parties lies in the exploitation of the trademark rather than the technology [37].
Licenciranje znamk se pogosto pojavlja v okviru distribucije ter nadaljnje prodaje blaga in storitev ter je praviloma sorodnejše sporazumom o distribuciji kot sporazumom o licenciranju tehnologije.
The TTBER does not cover licensing of copyright other than software copyright (except for the situation set out in point (47)).
Če je licenca blagovne znamke neposredno povezana z uporabo, prodajo ali nadaljnjo prodajo blaga in storitev ter ne pomeni osnovnega cilja sporazuma, je licenčni sporazum zajet v aktu, navedenem v točki 2 Priloge XIV k Sporazumu EGP (Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 330/2010 z dne 20. aprila 2010) o uporabi člena 53(3) Sporazuma EGP za skupine vertikalnih sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o skupinski izjemi za vertikalne sporazume) [39].
The Authority will, however, as a general rule apply the principles set out in the TTBER and these guidelines when assessing licensing of copyright for the production of contract products under Article 53.
Koncept „prenosa“ pomeni, da mora tehnologija prehajati od enega podjetja k drugemu.
On the other hand, the licensing of rental rights and public performance rights protected by copyright, in particular for films or music, is considered to raise particular issues and it may not be warranted to assess such licensing on the basis of the principles developed in these guidelines.
Taki prenosi navadno potekajo v obliki podeljevanja licence, pri katerem dajalec licence pridobitelju licence podeli pravico za uporabo lastnih tehnoloških pravic proti plačilu licenčnine.
In the application of Article 53 the specificities of the work and the way in which it is exploited must be taken into account [38].
Kot je določeno v členu 1(1)(c) TTBER, se za sporazume o prenosu tehnologije štejejo tudi odstopi tehnoloških pravic, pri katerih odstopnik ostane deloma izpostavljen tveganju v zvezi z izkoriščanem tehnologije.
The Authority will therefore not apply the TTBER and the present guidelines by way of analogy to the licensing of these other rights.
To velja zlasti, če je znesek, ki ga je treba plačati za odstop, odvisen od prihodkov od prodaje, ki jih odstopnik pridobi za izdelke, proizvedene z odstopljeno tehnologijo, količine teh proizvedenih izdelkov ali števila operacij, opravljenih z uporabo tehnologije.
The Authority will also not extend the principles developed in the TTBER and these guidelines to trademark licensing (except for the situation set out in point (47)).
Sporazum, s katerim se dajalec licence zaveže, da ne bo uveljavljal lastnih tehnoloških pravic v škodo pridobitelju licence, se prav tako lahko šteje za prenos tehnološke pravice.
Trademark licensing often occurs in the context of distribution and resale of goods and services and is generally more akin to distribution agreements than technology licensing.
Bistvo čiste licence patenta je pravica do delovanja znotraj področja, zajetega z izključno patentno pravico.
Where a trademark licence is directly related to the use, sale or resale of goods and services and does not constitute the primary object of the agreement, the licence agreement is covered by the act referred to in point 2 of Annex XIV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (‘Vertical Block Exemption Regulation’)) [39].
Iz tega sledi, da se TTBER uporablja tudi za tako imenovane sporazume o neuveljavljanju pravic in sporazume o poravnavi, s katerimi dajalec licence dovoli pridobitelju licence, da proizvaja znotraj področja, zajetega s patentom [40].
The concept of ‘transfer’ implies that technology must flow from one undertaking to another.
V skladu s členom 1(1)(c) TTBER Uredba zajema le sporazume o prenosu tehnologije „med dvema podjetjema“.
Such transfers normally take the form of licensing whereby the licensor grants the licensee the right to use its technology rights against payment of royalties.
Sporazumi o prenosu tehnologije med več kot dvema podjetjema niso zajeti v TTBER.
As set out in Article 1(1)(c) of the TTBER, assignments where part of the risk associated with the exploitation of the technology rights remains with the assignor are also deemed to be technology transfer agreements.
Odločilni dejavnik v smislu razločevanja med sporazumi med dvema podjetjema in večstranskimi sporazumi je, ali sta zadevni sporazum sklenili več kot dve podjetji.
In particular, this is the case where the sum payable in consideration of the assignment is dependent on the turnover obtained by the assignee in respect of products produced with the assigned technology, the quantity of such products produced or the number of operations carried out employing the technology.
Sporazumi, sklenjeni med dvema podjetjema, spadajo na področje uporabe TTBER, tudi če sporazum določa pogoje za več kot samo eno raven trgovanja.
An agreement whereby the licensor commits not to exercise its technology rights against the licensee can also be seen as a transfer of technology rights.
TTBER se na primer uporablja za licenčne sporazume, ki ne zadevajo le faze proizvodnje, temveč tudi fazo distribucije, in ki določajo obveznosti, ki jih pridobitelj licence mora ali sme naložiti prodajnim posrednikom za izdelke, proizvedene na podlagi licence [41].
Indeed, the essence of a pure patent licence is the right to operate inside the scope of the exclusive right of the patent.
Sporazumi o ustanovitvi tehnoloških združenj in licenciranje v okviru tehnoloških združenj so na splošno večstranski sporazumi in zato niso zajeti v TTBER [42].
It follows that the TTBER also covers so-called non-assertion agreements and settlement agreements whereby the licensor permits the licensee to produce within the scope of the patent [40].
Koncept tehnoloških združenj obsega sporazume, s katerimi se dve ali več pogodbenic dogovori, da bodo združile svoje tehnologije in jih licencirale v paketu.
According to Article 1(1)(c) of the TTBER, the Regulation only covers technology transfer agreements ‘between two undertakings’.
Koncept tehnoloških združenj zajema tudi dogovore, v okviru katerih dve ali več podjetij podeli licenco tretji osebi in ji dovoli, da paket tehnologij licencira naprej.
Technology transfer agreements between more than two undertakings are not covered by the TTBER.
Licenčni sporazumi, ki so sklenjeni med več kot dvema podjetjema, pogosto povzročajo iste težave kot licenčni sporazumi iste narave, sklenjeni med dvema podjetjema.
The decisive factor in terms of distinguishing between agreements between two undertakings and multiparty agreements is whether the agreement in question is concluded between more than two undertakings.
Nadzorni organ bo pri posamezni presoji licenčnih sporazumov, ki so iste narave kot sporazumi, zajeti s skupinsko izjemo, vendar pa so sklenjeni med več kot dvema podjetjema, po analogiji uporabljal načela, določena v TTBER.
Agreements concluded by two undertakings fall within the scope of the TTBER even if the agreement stipulates conditions for more than one level of trade.
Vendar so tehnološka združenja in licenciranje v okviru tehnoloških združenj posebej obravnavani v poglavju 4.4.
For instance, the TTBER applies to a licence agreement concerning not only the production stage but also the distribution stage, stipulating the obligations that the licensee must or may impose on resellers of the products produced under the licence [41].
Iz člena 1(1)(c) TTBER izhaja, da se TTBER uporablja za tiste licenčne sporazume, ki so sklenjeni za namene „proizvodnje pogodbenih izdelkov“, torej izdelkov, ki vključujejo licenčne tehnološke pravice ali so proizvedeni na njihovi podlagi.
Agreements establishing technology pools and licensing out from technology pools are generally multiparty agreements and are therefore not covered by the TTBER [42].
Licenca mora pridobitelju licence in/ali njegovemu podizvajalcu omogočiti izkoriščanje licenčne tehnologije za proizvodnjo blaga ali storitev (glej tudi uvodno izjavo 7 TTBER).
The notion of technology pools covers agreements whereby two or more parties agree to pool their respective technologies and license them as a package.
Če namen sporazuma ni proizvodnja pogodbenih izdelkov, ampak na primer zgolj blokiranje razvoja konkurenčne tehnologije, licenčni sporazum ni zajet v TTBER in prav tako te smernice morda niso ustrezne za presojo takega sporazuma.
The notion of technology pools also covers arrangements whereby two or more undertakings agree to license a third party and authorise it to license-on the package of technologies.
Splošneje, če pogodbenici ne izkoriščata licenčnih tehnoloških pravic, se ne izvajajo nobene dejavnosti, ki bi privedle do povečanja učinkovitosti, in v takem primeru se izgubi tudi sam smisel skupinske izjeme.
Licence agreements concluded between more than two undertakings often give rise to the same issues as licence agreements of the same nature concluded between two undertakings.
Vendar pa ni treba, da se izkoriščanje izvaja prek povezovanja sredstev.
In its individual assessment of licence agreements which are of the same nature as those covered by the block exemption but which are concluded between more than two undertakings, the Authority will apply by analogy the principles set out in the TTBER.
Izkoriščanje se prav tako izvaja, če pridobitelj licence z licenco pridobi svobodo oblikovanja s tem, da mu licenca omogoči izkoriščanje lastne tehnologije, ne da bi bil izpostavljen tveganju, da dajalec licence vloži tožbo zaradi kršitve njegovih pravic.
However, technology pools and licensing out from technology pools are specifically dealt with in Section 4.4.
V primeru licenciranja med konkurenti lahko dejstvo, da pogodbenici ne izkoriščata licenčne tehnologije, nakazuje, da je dogovor dejansko prikriti kartel.
It follows from Article 1(1)(c) of the TTBER that for licence agreements to be covered by it they must be entered into ‘for the purpose of the production of contract products’, that is to say, products incorporating or produced with the licensed technology rights.
Zato bo Nadzorni organ zelo natančno proučil primere neizkoriščanja.
The licence must permit the licensee and/or its sub-contractor(s) to exploit the licensed technology for the purpose of producing goods or services (see also recital 7 in the preamble of the TTBER).
TTBER se uporablja za licenčne sporazume za proizvodnjo pogodbenih izdelkov s strani pridobitelja licence in/ali njegovih podizvajalcev.
Where the purpose of the agreement is not the production of contract products but, for instance, merely to block the development of a competing technology, the licence agreement is not covered by the TTBER and these guidelines may also not be appropriate for the agreement's assessment.
TTBER se zato ne uporablja za sporazume o prenosu tehnologije (oziroma tiste dele takih sporazumov), ki omogočajo podeljevanje podlicenc.
More generally, if the parties refrain from exploiting the licensed technology rights, no efficiency enhancing activity takes place, in which case the very rationale of the block exemption is absent.
Vendar pa bo Nadzorni organ po analogiji uporabljal načela iz TTBER in teh smernic za krovne licenčne („master licensing“) sporazume med dajalcem in pridobiteljem licence (tj. sporazume, s katerimi dajalec licence dovoli pridobitelju licence podelitev podlicence za tehnologijo).
However, exploitation does not need to take the form of an integration of assets.
Sporazumi med pridobiteljem licence in pridobitelji podlicence za proizvodnjo pogodbenih izdelkov so zajeti v TTBER.
Exploitation also occurs where the licence creates design freedom for the licensee by allowing it to exploit its own technology without facing the risk of infringement claims by the licensor.
Izraz „pogodbeni izdelki“ zajema blago in storitve, ki se proizvedejo z licenčnimi tehnološkimi pravicami.
In the case of licensing between competitors, the fact that the parties do not exploit the licensed technology may be an indication that the arrangement is a disguised cartel.
To velja, kadar se licenčna tehnologija uporablja v proizvodnem procesu in tudi kadar je vključena v sam izdelek.
For these reasons the Authority will examine cases of non-exploitation very closely.
V teh smernicah izraz „izdelki, ki vključujejo licenčno tehnologijo“ zajema oba primera.
The TTBER applies to licence agreements for the purpose of the production of contract products by the licensee and/or its subcontractor(s).
TTBER se uporablja v vseh primerih, kjer se tehnološke pravice licencirajo z namenom proizvodnje blaga in storitev.
Therefore, the TTBER does not apply to (those parts of) technology transfer agreements that allow for sublicensing.
Okvir TTBER in teh smernic temelji na predpostavki, da obstaja neposredna zveza med licenčnimi tehnološkimi pravicami in pogodbenim izdelkom.
However, the Authority will apply by analogy the principles set out in the TTBER and these guidelines to ‘master licensing’ agreements between licensor and licensee (that is to say an agreement whereby the licensor allows the licensee to sublicense the technology).
V primerih, ko take zveze ni oziroma ko namen sporazuma ni omogočitev proizvodnje pogodbenega izdelka, analitični okvir TTBER in teh smernic morda ni primeren.
Agreements between the licensee and sublicensees for the production of contract products are covered by the TTBER.
Licenciranje avtorskih pravic na programski opremi zgolj za namene reproduciranja in distribuiranja zaščitenega dela, torej proizvajanja primerkov za nadaljnjo prodajo, se ne šteje za „proizvodnjo“ v smislu TTBER in ga zato TTBER in te smernice ne zajemajo.
The term ‘contract products’ encompasses goods and services produced with the licensed technology rights.
Namesto tega je tako reproduciranje za distribucijo po analogiji zajeto v uredbi o skupinski izjemi za vertikalne sporazume [43] in Smernicah o vertikalnih omejitvah [44].
This is the case both where the licensed technology is used in the production process and where it is incorporated into the product itself.
Reproduciranje za distribucijo obstaja, če se licenca podeli za reproduciranje programske opreme na nosilcu ne glede na tehnična sredstva, s katerimi se programska oprema distribuira.
In these guidelines the term ‘products incorporating the licensed technology’ covers both situations.
TTBER in te smernice na primer ne zajemajo licenciranja avtorskih pravic na programski opremi, s katerimi pridobitelj licence pridobi izvirnik programske opreme, da jo lahko reproducira in prodaja končnim uporabnikom.
The TTBER applies in all cases where technology rights are licensed for the purposes of producing goods and services.
Prav tako ne zajemajo licenciranja avtorskih pravic na programski opremi in distribucije programske opreme z „vakuumsko pakiranimi“ licencami, tj. sklopom pogojev, ki so vključeni v paketu s fizično kopijo, za katere se šteje, da jih končni uporabnik sprejme, s tem ko odpre ovoj paketa, ali licenciranja avtorskih pravic na programski opremi in distribucije programske opreme s pomočjo spletnega prenosa.
The framework of the TTBER and these guidelines is based on the premise that there is a direct link between the licensed technology rights and a contract product.
Vendar, če pridobitelj licence licenčno programsko opremo vključi v pogodbeni izdelek, to ne pomeni zgolj reprodukcije, temveč proizvodnjo.
In cases where no such link exists, that is to say where the purpose of the agreement is not to enable the production of a contract product, the analytical framework of the TTBER and these guidelines may not be appropriate.
TTBER in te smernice na primer zajemajo licenciranje avtorskih pravic na programski opremi, če ima pridobitelj licence pravico do reproduciranja programske opreme z njeno vključitvijo v napravo, s katero se programska oprema povezuje.
The licensing of software copyright for the purpose of mere reproduction and distribution of the protected work, that is to say, the production of copies for resale, is not considered to be ‘production’ within the meaning of the TTBER and thus is not covered by the TTBER and these guidelines.
TTBER zajema tudi „podizvajalske pogodbe“, v okviru katerih dajalec licence licencira tehnološke pravice pridobitelju licence, slednji pa se zaveže, da bo na podlagi licenčnih tehnoloških pravic proizvajal določene izdelke izključno za dajalca licence.
Such reproduction for distribution is instead covered by analogy by the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation [43] and the guidelines on vertical restraints [44].
Podizvajalske pogodbe lahko vključujejo tudi dobavo opreme s strani dajalca licence, ki se bo uporabljala za proizvodnjo blaga in storitev, zajetih v sporazumu.
Reproduction for distribution exists where a licence is granted to reproduce the software on a carrier, regardless of the technical means by which the software is distributed.
Da bi bil ta zadnji način sklepanja pogodb s podizvajalci zajet v TTBER kot del sporazuma o prenosu tehnologije, mora biti dobavljena oprema neposredno povezana s proizvodnjo pogodbenih izdelkov.
For instance, the TTBER and these guidelines do not cover the licensing of software copyright whereby the licensee is provided with a master copy of the software in order to reproduce and sell on the software to end-users.
Podizvajalske pogodbe so prav tako zajete v Obvestilu Nadzornega organa o presoji nekaterih pogodb o podizvajanju v skladu s členom 53(1) Sporazuma EGP [45].
Nor do they cover the licensing of software copyright and distribution of software by means of ‘shrink wrap’ licences, that is, a set of conditions included in the package of the hard copy which the end-user is deemed to have accepted by opening the wrapping of the package, or the licensing of software copyright and distribution of software by means of online downloading.
V skladu z navedenim obvestilom, ki se še vedno uporablja, podizvajalske pogodbe, s katerimi se podizvajalec zaveže, da bo proizvajal določene izdelke izključno za naročnika, praviloma niso zajete s prepovedjo iz člena 53(1).
However, where the licensed software is incorporated by the licensee in the contract product this is not considered as mere reproduction but production.
Podizvajalske pogodbe, s katerimi izvajalec določi ceno prenosa pogodbenega polizdelka med podizvajalci v podizvajalski verigi dodajanja vrednosti, na splošno ne spadajo na področje uporabe člena 53(1), če se pogodbeni izdelki proizvajajo izključno za naročnika.
For instance, the TTBER and these guidelines cover the licensing of software copyright where the licensee has the right to reproduce the software by incorporating it into a device with which the software interacts.
Vendar pa so lahko v členu 53 zajete druge omejitve, naložene podizvajalcu, kot so obveznost, da ne izvaja ali izkorišča svojega lastnega razvoja in raziskav [46].
The TTBER covers ‘subcontracting’ whereby the licensor licenses technology rights to the licensee who undertakes to produce certain products on the basis thereof exclusively for the licensor.
TTBER se uporablja tudi za sporazume, pri katerih mora pridobitelj licence izvesti razvojno delo, preden pridobi izdelek ali proces, ki je primeren za komercialno izkoriščanje, pod pogojem, da je pogodbeni izdelek opredeljen.
Subcontracting may also involve the supply of equipment by the licensor to be used in the production of the goods and services covered by the agreement.
Čeprav je treba opraviti tako nadaljnje delo in naložbe, je cilj sporazuma proizvodnja opredeljenega pogodbenega izdelka, torej izdelkov, ki se proizvajajo z licenčnimi tehnološkimi pravicami.
For the latter type of subcontracting to be covered by the TTBER as part of a technology transfer agreement, the supplied equipment must be directly related to the production of the contract products.
TTBER in te smernice ne zajemajo sporazumov, s katerimi se licenca za tehnološke pravice podeli z namenom, da se pridobitelju licence omogoči, da na različnih področjih izvaja dodatne raziskave in razvoj, vključno z nadaljnjim razvojem izdelka, ki izhaja iz takih raziskav in razvoja [47].
Subcontracting is also covered by the Authority's notice concerning its assessment of certain subcontracting agreements in relation to Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement [45].
TTBER in te smernice na primer ne zajemajo licenciranja orodij za tehnološke raziskave, ki se uporabljajo v okviru nadaljnjih raziskovalnih dejavnosti.