natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Is sensitive to the idea that control of expenditure could represent an administrative burden; considers that the obligation of accountability must not discourage potential beneficiaries from applying for financial assistance;
opozarja, da je prednostna naloga ustrezno obvestiti oblikovalce politik, različne deležnike in davkoplačevalce Unije o glavni dodani vrednosti in glavnih slabostih različnih možnosti in scenarijev trgovinskih politik;
Part V
meni, da je nedopustno, da študije o oceni učinka na trajnostni razvoj ponekod manjkajo, so nepopolne ali temeljijo na starih ali zastarelih podatkih, drugod (Čile) pa so na voljo šele po podpisu sporazuma;
Special Report No 17/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU Climate Finance in the context of External Aid’
vztraja, da je pred podpisom novega sporazuma treba dokončati študijo o oceni učinka na trajnostni razvoj, na kateri bo sporazum temeljil, ter jo javno objaviti;
Welcomes the special report examining Union climate finance in the context of external aid as an important contribution to the overall political and financial debate about the Union's climate policy and diplomacy; takes note of the findings, conclusions and recommendations and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
obžaluje, da partnerji v splošnem sistemu preferencialov niso v vseh primerih podpisali mednarodnih konvencij o človekovih pravicah; poziva Komisijo, naj v preferencialnih trgovinskih režimih bolj poudari okolje in dobro upravljanje;
Welcomes the findings of the report which show that the Commission has managed Union climate-related spending from the Union budget and the European Development Funds (EDF) well;
želi biti obveščen o ukrepih, ki jih bo do oktobra 2015 na osnovi priporočil in pripomb Parlamenta in Računskega sodišča sprejela Komisija;
Welcomes also the work begun by the Commission and Member States on a common Union standard for monitoring, reporting and verification of public climate finance;
meni, da bi morala Komisija, če želi izboljšati ocenjevanje gospodarskega učinka preferencialnih trgovinskih režimov:
Reiterates Parliament's position, of which the Court of Auditors took note in its special report, which insists that climate finance should be additional to the 0,7 % target; regrets the failure to confirm Parliament's concept of additionality in the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) negotiations;
za vsak preferencialni trgovinski režim izvesti oceno učinka in študijo o oceni učinka na trajnostni razvoj, ki bosta zagotovili poglobljeno, izčrpno in količinsko opredeljeno analizo pričakovanih gospodarskih učinkov, vključno z natančno oceno izpadlih prihodkov;
Points out however that there is a need for the Commission to exercise sufficient leadership to maximise its international impact and to consolidate the tools for shaping conditions for the Union's climate/green diplomacy in future years, in particular to deliver the climate-related benchmarks within the DCI as adopted in December 2013, stating that it ‘should contribute to the overall objective of addressing at least 20 % of the Union budget to low carbon and climate resilient society, and that GPGC should use at least 25 % of its funds to cover climate change and environment (Recital 20 of the DCI)’; points out that Annex IV to the DCI also specifies that under the Global Public Goods and Challenges (GPGC) programme, 27 % of the funds are allocated to Environment and Climate Change and at least 50 % of the GPGC programme will serve for climate related action and environment-related objectives;
pri oceni kakovosti statističnih virov podatkov, ki se uporabljajo za ocene učinka na trajnostni razvoj, redno sodelovati z Eurostatom, ter zagotoviti, da so opravljene analize pravočasno na voljo pogajalcem;
Welcomes the fact that a commitment to improving EU Joint Programming since 2011 has been made in some 40 countries; points out however that coordination between the Commission and Member States in climate finance for developing countries still needs to be improved considerably to not only meet the 2020 commitment but to also allow the Union to stay a frontrunner in terms of climate actions and to combat corruption in developing countries;
izvesti vmesne in naknadne ocene vseh preferencialnih trgovinskih režimov, vključno z oceno izpadlih prihodkov, da bi ocenila, v kolikšnem obsegu so preferencialni trgovinski režimi s pomembnim učinkom izpolnili cilje svoje politike in kako bi lahko izboljšali njihove rezultate v ključnih sektorjih;
Reiterates Parliament's support for joint programming and its recognition of the significant progress made on this; looks forward to being re-consulted, as promised by the Commission, if such programming leads to changes in the DCI programming;
meni, da bi Komisija za izboljšanje zaščite finančnih interesov Unije morala:
Notes the explanations about the difficulties in tracking and reporting due to the divergent reporting practices of Member States given in the Accountability Report from the Commission on Financing for Development, published on 3 July 2014 in the form of a Staff Working Paper, including a section in Volume I on Climate Finance which provides information on Union climate financing; notes that the report repeats the figure of EUR 7,3 billion of Fast Start Finance made available by the Union and Member States, and urges further improvements in reporting on the impact and results of development aid;
vzpostaviti profile tveganj v zvezi s preferencialnimi trgovinskimi režimi na ravni Unije, ki bi državam članicam omogočil skupen pristop k analizi tveganj, da bi se zmanjšale izgube za proračun Unije;
Future developments
preveriti, ali države članice krepijo uspešnost svojih sistemov za obvladovanje tveganja in strategije kontrole, da bi se zmanjšale izgube za proračun Unije;
Calls for more earmarking of funds to specific sectors, including climate finance when channelled via Budget Support, and more transparency over the use of funds overall;
spodbujati države članice, da po prejemu sporočil o medsebojni pomoči sprejmejo ustrezne previdnostne ukrepe;
Considers that the Commission and the EEAS should strengthen their communication policy, both on the support provided globally or to individual recipient countries and to project the Union's values;
opraviti oceno ter na podlagi tveganj izvajati nadzorne obiske v državah, ki so upravičene do preferencialne obravnave, zlasti v zvezi s pravili o poreklu in kumulacijo;
Recognises that corruption remains a significant barrier to effective climate finance and urges the Commission to step up its efforts in regards to working with development partners on anti-corruption issues;
zahtevati, da države članice izboljšajo kakovost informacij o upravnem sodelovanju, ki jih sporočajo;
Requests that the Commission propose a road map to the Council for the scaling-up of climate finance towards the Copenhagen Accord 2020 target, including a definition of private finance;
izboljšati nadaljnje finančno ukrepanje na podlagi preiskav Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF), da se preprečijo izgube za proračun Unije zaradi zastaranja;
Requests that the Commission make an independent evaluation of the Global Climate Change Alliance, including an examination of why most Member States did not choose to co-finance it;
utrditi položaj Unije v vzajemnih preferencialnih trgovinskih režimih, okrepiti uporabo previdnostnih in zaščitnih ukrepov ter jih vključiti v vse prihodnje trgovinske sporazume;
Asks the Commission and the EEAS to report on the extent to which the target of spending 20 % of the Union budget and the EDF over 2014 to 2020 on climate related action is implemented in development aid, specifying what has been committed and disbursed;
brez odlašanja zagotoviti pregled povračil iz obdobja od 2010 do 2014;
Calls on the Commission and Member States, in the framework of Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11] (Monitoring Mechanism Regulation), to agree common standards for monitoring, reporting and verification, in particular with respect to the definition of ‘new and additional’, the application of the Rio Markers and reporting on the disbursement of climate finance;
obvestiti Parlament o rezultatih pobude za globalni dogovor v Bangladešu;
Invites the Commission and Member States to intensify their cooperation to implement the EU Code of Conduct on Division of Labour in the field of climate finance, notably with respect to the exchange of information on allocations by countries, joint programming and preventing and combatting corruption in climate finance;
Del IX
Part VI
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 3/2014 z naslovom „Izkušnje, pridobljene pri razvoju schengenskega informacijskega sistema druge generacije (SIS II), za katerega je bila odgovorna Evropska komisija“
Special Report No 18/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The reliability of the results of the Member States' checks of the agricultural expenditure’
pozdravlja ugotovitve in priporočila iz posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča št. 3/2014;
Acknowledges that the systems examined in the Special Report No 18/2013 have been changed by the new CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) regulations, with increased responsibilities given to the certification bodies in the Member States in the field of the verification of legality and regularity of expenditure and the verification of control results communicated to the Commission;
kritizira Komisijo, ker ob začetku projekta ni zagotovila dovolj strokovnega osebja ne za tehnično izvajanje ne za ocenjevanje kakovosti, povezano s projektom SIS II;
Welcomes the ongoing efforts of the Commission for the simplification of CAP; expects that the simplification of eligibility criteria leads to the simplification of control rules and can contribute towards a lower error rate;
priporoča, naj se vse pomembnejše projekte na področju IT vključi v postopek upravljanja IT ter naj se k sodelovanju ne povabi le strokovnjakov iz Generalnega direktorata za informatiko, temveč tudi iz drugih generalnih direktoratov ter zunanje strokovnjake, da bi bolje izkoristili strokovno znanje notranjih strokovnjakov;
Reminds the Commission to ensure that the problems encountered are not repeated; recalls that the Court of Auditors' findings in its 2012 Annual Report were as follows:
priporoča, naj Komisija pri vsakem pomembnejšem projektu od vsega začetka uporablja strokovno znanje držav članic in ustanovi skupino strokovnjakov, ki jo bodo sestavljali predstavniki držav članic, pristojnih za projekt; meni, da je treba jasno opredeliti nalogo te skupine in pristojnosti njenih članov;
that the supervisory and control systems of the Member States for expense payments and for rural development were partially effective and that for a significant number of transactions affected by error, the national authorities had enough information to detect and correct the errors concerned;
kritizira dejstvo, da ob začetku projekta ne Komisija, ki naj bi med drugim predstavljala interese končnih uporabnikov sistema SIS II, ne vodilni deležniki niso poznali tehničnih zahtev in zahtev končnih uporabnikov;
that the effectiveness of the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) is adversely affected, mainly by inaccurate databases used for cross-checks;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija pri prihodnjih projektih v sodelovanju z državami članicami že ob začetku projekta pripravila natančni profil tehničnih zahtev in zahtev uporabnikov, ki jih je treba izpolniti;
Stresses that on 3 April 2014, Parliament endorsed the reservation of the Director-General of DG AGRI in its Annual Activity Report for 2012 as regards the deficiencies found by the Commission and the Court of Auditors in the eligibility of land; reiterates that Parliament asked, in particular, that permanent pasture should be properly recorded in the land parcel identification system (LPIS) and that it should be informed by the Commission on a 6-month basis on progress made;
meni, da je Komisija s tem, ko je objavila splošni razpis za projekt, ne da bi jasno opredelila njegove zahteve, tratila davkoplačevalski denar;
Asks the Commission and the Member States to take immediate remedial action when administrative and control systems, and/or IACS databases, are found to be deficient or out of date;
priporoča Komisiji, naj oblikuje uresničljiv poslovni načrt in časovni razpored za prihodnje projekte IT, ki bosta temeljila na jasno opredeljenih zahtevah glede oblike in vsebine ter na jasni analizi stroškov, in za katera bodo pri časovnem načrtovanju upoštevana tveganja in kompleksnost projekta;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that payments are based on inspection results and that those inspections are of the necessary quality to determine eligible areas in a reliable and consistent manner;
kritizira dejstvo, da je Komisija že večkrat poskušala prikriti zamude in čedalje večje stroške;
Urges the Commission to ensure that the design and quality of the work performed by the paying agencies and the certification bodies provide a reliable basis for the assessment of the legality and regularity of underlying transactions; maintains that in order to achieve this, the Commission should work towards the goal of a single audit strategy for the CAP control system;
zahteva najvišjo možno raven preglednosti v prihodnjih projektih IT, in sicer v zvezi s stalnim posredovanjem informacij ustreznemu pristojnemu odboru Parlamenta, zlasti glede bistvenih odločitev o prehodu v naslednje faze projekta ali nepredvidenih sprememb stroškov, časovnega načrtovanja ali alternativnih rešitev;
Welcomes the change in the approach used by DG AGRI to calculate the residual error rate for decoupled area aid in 2012, as it takes into account the fact that the inspection statistics, the declarations of the directors of paying agencies and the work carried out by the certification bodies can be affected by deficiencies impacting their reliability; calls for this new approach to extend to all CAP expenditure in DG AGRI's Annual Activity Reports in the new funding period;
meni, da v pogodbi z glavnim izvajalcem ne bi smeli omejiti pogojev izvrševanja zahtevkov za plačilo odškodnine; meni, da morajo prihodnje pogodbe vsebovati učinkovit mehanizem kaznovanja, da se zagotovi pravočasna izvedba ob zahtevanih standardih;
Reminds the Commission that it has endorsed the reservation contained in DG AGRI's annual activity report for the total EAFRD expenditure for 2012 and that this reservation is due to concerns about the quality of controls in some Member States, as well as the error rate reported by the Court of Auditors;
kritizira, da Komisija kljub slabim rezultatom v prvi fazi projekta ni prekinila pogodbe z glavnim izvajalcem;
Calls on the Member States to carry out their existing administrative checks in an efficient way by using all relevant information available to the paying agencies, as this has the potential to detect and correct the majority of the errors;
kritizira, da Komisija ni vztrajala pri razvojnem sistemu za izvajanje SIS II, ki bi temeljil na komponentah; meni, da bi lahko, če bi uvedli povezljive delovne gradnike, celotne elemente prenesli na drugega izvajalca, da ne bi bili vezani na enega samega;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to focus on the cost-efficiency of controls as an area of importance, specifically by further developing the use of risk-based controls;
kritizira, da je Komisija pri ponovnih pogajanjih glede pogodbe osemkrat presegla njeno prvotno vrednost, kljub točki (e) člena 126(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 [13], ki določa, da vrednost pogodbe ne sme preseči več kot 50 % njene prvotne vrednosti;
Calls on the Commission to ensure in the area of rural development that uniform standards and procedures are being equally applied and observed, both by its approving and auditing bodies;
v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da bo morda treba pregledati točko (b) člena 134(1) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1268/2012 [14], saj tehnična ali umetniška navezanost na enega izvajalca ne sme zaobiti zaščitne določbe iz točke (e) istega odstavka in dovoliti nesorazmernega množenja prvotne vrednosti izvirne pogodbe;
Part VII
ugotavlja, da bi moral proračunski organ v primeru znatnega množenja prvotnih stroškov projekta ali bistvenih sprememb glede pričakovanih koristi, tveganj ali alternativnih rešitev te spremembe predhodno odobriti;
Special Report No 1/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Effectiveness of EU-supported public urban transport projects’
obžaluje več primerov prerazporeditve proračunskih sredstev, ne da bi to odobril proračunski organ;
Emphasises that the European Structural and Investment Funds (‘ESI funds’) are the single most important source for Union funding for urban mobility projects and that such projects are not only crucial for the accessibility of urban areas in the Union's less developed regions but that they also have important social and environmental aspects for the quality of life of Union citizens;
pozdravlja smernice za vodenje projektov, ki jih od leta 2011 priporoča Generalni direktorat za informatiko; meni, da mora vodilni odbor projekta na podlagi teh smernic odobriti začetek naslednjih faz projekta, kar se imenuje tudi „odobritveni mejnik“;
Stresses the increasing importance of continued Union financial assistance, considering in particular the negative consequences of growing urban sprawl and the prospect of the further steady growth of the urban population;
poudarja, da se je treba ozreti naprej, saj bo SIS II do konca desetletja morda že nasičen in bo treba vzpostaviti SIS III; zato upa, da bodo priprave na SIS III potekale bistveno bolje;
Stresses the need to ensure that the delivery of urban mobility projects both by the Commission and Member States must therefore be responsible, effective and efficient, pursuing concrete results rather than the absorption of the available funds;
Del X
Reiterates, while mindful of the principle of subsidiarity, the call on Member States made in the Commission's communication of 17 December 2013 entitled ‘Together towards competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility’ (COM(2013) 913):
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 4/2014 z naslovom „Vključitev ciljev vodne politike EU v SKP: delni uspeh“
to ensure the detailed assessments of the present and future performance, the coordination and the integration of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) into wider urban and territorial strategies, amending, where necessary, technical and other tools at the disposal of planning authorities;
poziva Komisijo, naj zakonodajalcu Unije predlaga potrebne spremembe obstoječih instrumentov (navzkrižne skladnosti in razvoja podeželja), da se zagotovi skladnost z Direktivo 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [15] (okvirna direktiva o vodah), ali po potrebi nove instrumente, ki bodo omogočali doseganje ambicioznejših ciljev pri vključevanju ciljev vodne politike v skupno kmetijsko politiko;
to focus on appropriate vehicles in addition to infrastructure as a tool to deliver sustainable urban mobility in urban logistics;
poziva države članice, naj v skladu z okvirno direktivo o vodah:
Calls on the Commission and authorities in Member States, taking note of the negative impact of the financial crisis on the usage of transport systems, to pay more attention to the objectives, targets and indicators, in particular those in the project application forms, in order to identify potential risks and guard against any optimism bias in future projects and to avoid the kind of over-runs in time and cost mentioned in the special report;
obravnavajo slabosti pri izvajanju pregledov navzkrižne skladnosti, ki so bile odkrite pri reviziji;
Urges the Commission to perform more thorough cost-benefit analyses of indicative budgets of urban transport projects and to share best practices with the Member States, as well as encourage such exchanges among them, thus supporting authorities in successfully developing projects that are not subject to the Commission's approval;
sistematično uvajajo ustrezne kazni v primeru kršitev;
Insists that the Commission encourages the use of Jaspers (Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions) by Member States and that it fully exploits its potential for assisting in the development and assessment of the quality of urban transport projects financed by ESI funds;
namenijo več pozornosti odkrivanju in obravnavi težav v zvezi z vodo v okviru svojih programov za razvoj podeželja (RPR) in zagotovijo njihovo skladnost z načrti za upravljanje povodij;
Draws attention, however, to the fact that public urban transport is not simply a revenue-generating activity but is also a crucial, and at times irreplaceable, element of urban mobility systems for many large cities, even in more developed regions, as these also suffer from ‘the urban paradox’ due to the existence of socially vulnerable constituencies;
načrtujejo in dosledno izvajajo zaščitne mehanizme za preprečevanje negativnih učinkov dejavnosti, ki se financirajo v okviru razvoja podeželja, na vode;
Asks therefore that the relevant authorities take into full consideration the social dimension of public urban transport projects, based on appropriate justifications included in the application form;
dejavno obravnavajo in ustrezno spodbujajo uporabo sredstev, namenjenih vprašanjem v zvezi z vodo, na način, ki bo skladen z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja;
Asks the Commission to quickly adopt the relevant implementing and delegated acts in order to prevent potential delays, recognising that transport projects usually require considerable time for elaboration and implementation;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija predlagala ustrezne mehanizme, ki lahko učinkovito izboljšajo kakovost programskih dokumentov okvirne direktive o vodah posameznih držav članic in preprečijo neupoštevanje časovnega načrta, ki ga ta direktiva določa; meni, da bi bilo treba zato pred dodelitvijo sredstev za razvoj podeželja določiti minimalne pogoje izvajanja okvirne direktive o vodah;
Insists that the elements set out in the Annex to the abovementioned Commission communication of 17 December 2013 be implemented, including:
poziva države članice, naj nujno pospešijo proces izvajanja okvirne direktive o vodah in izboljšajo kakovost načrtov upravljanja povodij v naslednjem obdobju upravljanja (2015), tako da opišejo posamezne ukrepe (npr. področje uporabe, časovni načrt, ciljne vrednosti in stroški) in poskrbijo, da bodo ti dovolj jasni in konkretni tako na operativni kot tudi na lokalni ravni oziroma ravni kmetij;
comprehensive status analysis and baseline through an ‘urban mobility performance audit’, against which future performance can be measured;
poziva Komisijo, naj poveča poznavanje povezave med kakovostjo/količino voda ter kmetijskimi praksami, tako da izboljša svoje obstoječe sisteme za spremljanje in zagotovi, da je z njimi mogoče izmeriti vsaj razvoj trendov obremenitev voda zaradi kmetijskih praks; meni, da bi to pripomoglo pri ugotavljanju, katera območja najbolj potrebujejo sredstva SKP;
the identification of ‘hotspots’ within the urban areas where performance of the present transport system is particularly poor;
poziva države članice, naj izboljšajo pravočasno poročanje, zanesljivost in doslednost podatkov, ki jih posredujejo Komisiji, saj je kakovost informacij o vodah Unije kot celota odvisna od kakovosti informacij, ki jih posredujejo posamezne države članice;
suitable performance indicators which can then be properly monitored;
Del XI
specific performance objectives which are realistically ambitious with regard to the objectives of a SUMP;
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 5/2014 z naslovom „Oblikovanje evropskega bančnega nadzora – Evropski bančni organ in njegovo spreminjajoče se okolje“
measurable targets, based on a realistic assessment of the baseline and available resources, to reflect the specific SUMP objectives;
poudarja, da je potrebna medsektorska analiza učinka in da je pomembno upoštevati čas, potreben za pripravo tehničnih standardov; pozdravlja predlog Komisije o določitvi rokov za okrepitev tehničnih standardov in ugotavlja, da poteka medsektorska analiza za preučitev finančne zakonodaje Unije, sprejete v zadnjih letih, in ukrepov iz tega zakonodajnega svežnja;