natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Points out again that Community law does not contain a definition of an agency, and supports the definition of agencies as ‘bodies set up by the Communities having legal personality’ [4]; recalls the three categories of agency that fit this definition, namely decentralised agencies, executive agencies and other bodies;
znova poudarja, da zakonodaja Skupnosti ne vsebuje opredelitve agencije, in se zavzema za to, da bi se agencije opredelile kot „organi, ki jih ustanovi Skupnost in so pravne osebe“ [4]; znova navaja tri vrste agencij, ki ustrezajo tej opredelitvi, in sicer: decentralizirane agencije, izvajalske agencije in drugi organi;
Reiterates in this context the term ‘decentralised agencies’ as a general term for the traditional agencies; considers that the term ‘regulatory agency’, which is increasingly used as a generic term, is misleading, as not all decentralised agencies have regulatory tasks;
v zvezi s tem ponavlja, da je izraz „decentralizirane agencije“ splošna oznaka za tradicionalne agencije; meni, da je izraz „regulativna agencija“, ki se vse bolj uporablja kot splošno poimenovanje, zavajajoč, saj vse decentralizirane agencije nimajo regulativnih nalog;
Recalls that decentralised agencies are set up by the European legislator for a variety of reasons such as the provision of certain services, the employment of specialist expertise and the carrying-out of regulatory and monitoring tasks;
znova opozarja, da evropski zakonodajalec decentralizirane agencije ustanavlja iz različnih razlogov, na primer za opravljanje določenih storitev, zaposlovanje posebnih strokovnjakov, izvajanje regulativnih nalog in spremljanje;
Considers the establishment of the budget of decentralised bodies and assessment of the implementation of the respective budget as core responsibilities of its Committee on Budgets;
meni, da sta določitev proračuna decentraliziranih organov in ocena izvrševanja tega proračuna osrednji nalogi Odbora za proračun;
Urges the ECA, for the sake of transparency, to consider the three categories of agencies in its next annual report;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v naslednjem letnem poročilu zaradi preglednosti obravnava vse tri vrste agencij;
Notes that the ECA observed an improvement with regard to financial discipline compared to the financial year 2006, but that nevertheless in some of the agencies the areas of recruitment and procurement still contained weaknesses which must be addressed by the authorising officers;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče opazilo izboljšanje glede finančne discipline v primerjavi s proračunskim letom 2006, vendar so pri nekaterih agencijah na področju zaposlovanja in javnih naročil še vedno prisotne pomanjkljivosti, s katerimi se morajo soočiti odredbodajalci;
Deplores the fact that the ECA again found serious problems as regards the implementation of procurement rules and the Staff Regulations in many agencies; is not prepared to accept that these weaknesses have persisted over many years; considers that the revision of the Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 will not do away with these problems and that a fundamental overhaul of the legal framework is needed;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče pri mnogih agencijah ponovno odkrilo resne težave pri izvajanju pravil javnega naročanja in kadrovskih predpisov; ni pripravljen sprejeti, da te pomanjkljivosti trajajo že več let; meni, da revizija Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 ne bo rešila teh težav in da bi bilo treba temeljito pregledati pravni okvir;
Notes the Commission’s statement that all necessary support was granted to those agencies wishing to migrate to ABAC (accrual based accounting); notes that the agencies in some cases considered the support as insufficient;
je seznanjen z izjavo Komisije, da so vse agencije, ki so želele prestopiti k ABAC (računovodstvo na podlagi nastanka poslovnih dogodkov), dobile vso potrebno podporo; ugotavlja, da so agencije v nekaterih primerih menile, da podpora ni zadostna;
Budget planning and implementation
Načrtovanje in izvrševanje proračuna
Notes that the issue of agencies overestimating their cash requirements was addressed in the revised Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002, which contains provisions reinforcing the agencies’ obligation to submit, in their payment requests, rigorous forecasts of their real cash requirements throughout the year, in order to avoid unnecessary cash-flows;
ugotavlja, da je bilo vprašanje agencij, ki precenjujejo svoje finančne zahteve, obravnavano v revidirani Uredbi (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002, ki vsebuje določbo za okrepitev obveznosti agencij, da morajo v svojih zahtevkih za plačila predložiti natančno napoved svojih dejanskih finančnih potreb skozi celo leto, da se preprečijo nepotrebni denarni tokovi;
Urges the Commission to consider technical abatement in order to lower surpluses in case of low implementation rates and persistently high vacancy rates, which will also trigger a reduction of assigned revenue;
poziva Komisijo, naj obravnava tehnični pavšalni odbitek za zmanjšanje presekov v primeru nizkih stopenj izvrševanja in vztrajno visokih stopenj prostih delovnih mest, kar bi sprožilo znižanje namenskih prejemkov;
Notes, in this context, the difficulties of decentralised agencies in recruiting highly qualified staff and experts; invites the Commission and the European Personnel Selection Office to strengthen their supporting efforts;
v zvezi s tem opozarja na težave decentraliziranih agencij pri zaposlovanju visokokvalificiranih kadrov in strokovnjakov; poziva Komisijo in Evropski urad za izbor osebja, naj okrepita prizadevanja glede podpore;
Urges the Commission to continue scrutinising the agencies’ budget implementation for 2008 and 2009 and to make the necessary adjustments to the agencies’ budget proposals;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej nadzira izvrševanje proračuna agencij za leto 2008 in 2009 ter izvede potrebne prilagoditve predlogov proračunov agencij;
Welcomes the Commission’s efforts, since the 2009 preliminary draft budget (PDB), to systematically take into account the last known surpluses (in the case of the 2009 PDB, those of year n-2) when calculating the Community contribution; in order to improve transparency and efficiency, calls on the Commission, as a principal rule, to provide detailed information on the procedures for calculating and accounting for all types of assigned revenue at the agencies’ disposal, specifically those arising from previous years’ surpluses;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije od predhodnega predloga proračuna za leto 2009, da pri izračunu prispevka Skupnosti sistematično upošteva zadnje znane presežke (v primeru predhodnega predloga proračuna za leto 2009, tiste iz leta n-2); za boljšo preglednost in učinkovitost poziva Komisijo, naj kot glavno pravilo zagotovi podrobne informacije o postopkih izračuna in utemeljitve vseh vrst namenskih prejemkov, s katerimi razpolagajo agencije, zlasti tistih, ki so posledica presežkov prejšnjih let;
Welcomes the Commission’s decision to follow the requests of the budgetary authority to take assigned revenues into account when drawing up the PDB for the decentralised agencies for 2009; considers that this is undoubtedly a step towards greater budgetary transparency;
pozdravlja sklep Komisije, da bo upoštevala zahteve proračunskega organa in pri pripravi predhodnega predloga proračuna decentraliziranih agencij za leto 2009 upoštevala namenske prejemke; meni, da je to nedvomno korak k večji proračunski preglednosti;
Draws attention to the fact that the current use of the assigned revenue instruments still bears risks for budgetary transparency and sound financial management of EU funds in so far as estimations of assigned revenue remain difficult and the various types, years of origin and procedures to release assigned revenue does not enable them to be integrated in the budget planning and management in a clear manner;
opozarja, da sedanja uporaba instrumentov namenskih prejemkov še vedno ogroža preglednost proračuna in dobro finančno poslovodenje sredstev EU, ker so ocene namenskih prejemkov še vedno težavne in ker različne vrste, leta izvora in postopki za sprostitev namenskih prejemkov ne omogočajo njihove vključitve v proračunsko načrtovanje in upravljanje na jasen način;
Notes that in 2007 about EUR 550000000 of Community programme funds were committed by three executive agencies; in addition to the operational appropriations, EUR 47000000 was used for administrative purposes, i.e. operating the respective executive agency; notes that 119 temporary agents and 279 contract agents were operative in these agencies;
ugotavlja, da so tri izvajalske agencije v letu 2007 prevzele obveznosti za približno 550000000 EUR sredstev iz programov Skupnosti; poleg sredstev za poslovanje je bilo porabljenih še 47000000 EUR za upravne namene, tj. delovanje izvajalskih agencij; ugotavlja, da je v teh agencijah delalo 119 začasnih in 279 pogodbenih uslužbencev;
Reiterates the fact that the amounts taken from operational programme envelopes are used to finance purely administrative operations; invites its Committee on Budgetary Control to monitor closely future developments in the outsourcing of the administrative tasks of the Commission;
znova opominja na dejstvo, da se sredstva iz proračunov za operativne programe uporabljajo za financiranje izključno upravnih nalog; poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor, naj v prihodnje budno spremlja, kako poteka zunanje izvajanje upravnih nalog Komisije;
Notes that the Euratom Supply Agency functions as an administrative unit of the Commission, which is reflected by the budget nomenclature and by the fact that its Director-General is a staff member of the Commission;
ugotavlja, da Agencija za oskrbo Euratom deluje kot upravna enota Komisije, kar je mogoče razbrati tudi iz proračunske nomenklature in dejstva, da je generalni direktor te agencije uslužbenec Komisije;
Compliance with financial regulations and the Staff Regulations
Skladnost s finančno uredbo in kadrovskimi predpisi
Notes that it is a serious problem that a number of agencies are repeatedly criticised for not following rules such as Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, in particular the procurement rules, and the Staff Regulations; notes that the principal reason is that most rules are designed for larger institutions and that most of the small agencies do not have the critical mass to be able to cope with these regulatory requirements;
ugotavlja, da je resna težava, ker je vrsta agencij znova in znova kritiziranih zaradi nespoštovanja pravil, kot je Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002, zlasti pravil javnega naročanja in kadrovskih predpisov; ugotavlja, da je glavni vzrok ta, da je večina pravil namenjenih večjim institucijam in da večina manjših agencij nima kritične mase, ki bi zmogla izpolnjevati predpisane zahteve;
Regrets that the Commission, despite Parliament’s request in 2006 discharge resolutions on agencies, has not presented a rapid solution and therefore asks the Commission again to look for a quick solution in order to enhance effectiveness by grouping the administrative functions of various agencies together;
obžaluje, da Komisija kljub zahtevi Parlamenta iz resolucije o razrešnici za agencije iz leta 2006 ni predložila hitre rešitve in jo zato ponovno poziva, naj poišče hitro rešitev za povečanje učinkovitosti tako, da bo združila upravne funkcije različnih agencij;
Encourages the Commission to increase its efforts in providing all necessary administrative assistance to relatively small and especially newly-created agencies; bearing in mind negative experiences from the past; calls on the Commission to issue in the shortest possible time special guidelines for the agencies concerning the application of financial rules in relation to staff recruitment, public procurement and so on;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj si še bolj prizadeva pri zagotavljanju vse potrebne upravne pomoči relativno majhnim in zlasti novoustanovljenim agencijam; glede na slabe izkušnje iz preteklosti poziva Komisijo, naj v najkrajšem možnem času objavi agencijam namenjene posebne smernice o uporabi finančnih pravil v zvezi z zaposlovanjem osebja, oddaje javnih naročil in podobno;
Will, in this context, assess very carefully the study entitled ‘Opportunity and feasibility of establishing common support services for EU agencies’ commissioned by its Committee on Budgets and Committee on Budgetary Control;
namerava v zvezi s tem zelo pozorno oceniti raziskavo o možnosti in izvedljivosti skupne službe za podporo za agencije EU, ki sta jo naročila Odbor za proračun in Odbor za proračunski nadzor;
Is satisfied that the Commission’s internal audit service, in its annual activity report 2007, lifted its reservation from the previous year, when it declared that it was not in a position to audit each of the operational decentralised agencies once a year due to a lack of resources;
je zadovoljen, da je služba za notranjo revizijo Komisije v svojem letnem poročilu dejavnosti za leto 2007 umaknila zadržke iz prejšnjega leta, ko je navedla, da zaradi pomanjkanja sredstev ne more enkrat letno revidirati vseh operativnih decentraliziranih agencij;
Welcomes the pragmatic cooperation between the internal auditor of the Commission and the internal auditors and other persons in charge of internal audit in the agencies;
pozdravlja pragmatično sodelovanje med notranjim revizorjem Komisije ter notranjimi revizorji in drugimi osebami, odgovornimi za notranjo revizijo v agencijah;
Recalls that Parliament asked the agencies, in its 2006 discharge resolutions on agencies, if and how they comply with the obligation in Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 to send to the discharge authority and the Commission an annual report on internal audits; regrets the fact that, whereas 21 agencies are subject to the 2007 discharge procedure, Parliament only received such a report from two (the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training and the European Aviation Safety Agency);
opominja, da je Parlament v svoji resoluciji o razrešnici za agencije za leto 2006 vprašal agencije, če in kako izpolnjujejo obveznost iz Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002, da pošljejo letno poročilo o notranji reviziji organu, pristojnemu za podelitev razrešnice, in Komisiji; obžaluje, da je od 21 agencij, ki so vključene v postopek podelitve razrešnice za leto 2007, Parlament prejel to poročilo le od dveh agencij (Evropski center za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja in Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu);
Evaluation of the agencies’ performance
Ocena delovanja agencij
Notes the Commission’s follow-up on the 2006 discharge resolutions on the agencies, and that in September 2008 it finalised the following:
je seznanjen z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem Komisije po sprejetju resolucije o razrešnici za agencije za leto 2006 in ugotavlja, da je septembra 2008 končala:
an overview of the evaluation of the decentralised agencies, which provides a list of the agencies already assessed and a summary of the major findings;
pregled ocene decentraliziranih agencij, ki ponuja seznam že ocenjenih agencij in povzetek glavnih ugotovitev;
a document on the state of play and planning with regard to evaluation of the decentralised agencies; and
dokument o sedanjih razmerah in načrtovanju glede ocene decentraliziranih agencij; ter
a ‘Meta-study on decentralised agencies: cross-cutting analysis of evaluation findings’, prepared by an external contractor;
metaštudijo o decentraliziranih agencijah z medsektorsko analizo o ugotovitvah ocene, ki jo je pripravil zunanji izvajalec;
Is convinced that the evaluation of decentralised agencies launched and supervised by the Commission, and to be completed by the end of 2009, will contribute to the assessment of shortfalls and shortcomings of the agencies; is satisfied by the fact that the Commission has set up a reference group to launch the study;
je prepričan, da bo ocena decentraliziranih agencij, ki jo je začela in jo nadzoruje Komisija in naj bi bila končana še leta 2009, prispevala k opredelitvi pomanjkljivosti in slabosti teh agencij; je zadovoljen, da je Komisija vzpostavila referenčno skupino, ki naj bi začela študijo;
Recalls the Commission’s horizontal evaluation of the decentralised agencies referred to in its abovementioned Communication, the results of which should be available by 2009-2010; calls on the Commission to ensure that evaluations of agencies become more transparent in the interests of both the agencies and stakeholders;
opominja na horizontalno oceno Komisije o decentraliziranih agencijah, navedeno v prej omenjenem sporočilu, katere rezultati bi morali biti na voljo do leta 2009–2010; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo ocene agencij postale preglednejše, kar je v interesu agencij in zainteresiranih strani;
Disciplinary procedures
Disciplinski postopki
Recalls that Parliament, in its 2006 discharge resolutions concerning agencies, called on the agencies to consider an inter-agency disciplinary board; notes that progress has been made, but that difficulties remain, in particular due to problems in finding staff who have the appropriate career grade to be a member of the board; calls on the agencies to inform the discharge authority as to whether the inter-agency disciplinary board is feasible or not and, if applicable, to come forward with an alternative solution;
opominja, da je Parlament v svojih resolucijah o razrešnici za agencije za leto 2006 pozval agencije, naj preučijo možnost medagencijske disciplinske komisije; je seznanjen s tem, da je bil sicer dosežen napredek, da pa še vedno ostajajo težave, zlasti pri iskanju osebja iz primernih kariernih razredov, ki bi bili člani komisije; poziva agencije, naj obvestijo organ, pristojen za razrešnice, ali je ustanovitev medagencijske disciplinske komisije izvedljiva ali ne, ter naj po potrebi predložijo alternativno rešitev;
ECA Special Report No 5/2008
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 5/2008
Welcomes the timely publication by the ECA of its abovementioned special report, and urges the decentralised agencies to take on board the shortcomings identified in the report as well as to take action in line with the recommendations of the ECA;
pozdravlja pravočasno objavo omenjenega posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča in odločno poziva decentralizirane agencije, naj upoštevajo pomanjkljivosti, opredeljene v poročilu, in ukrepajo v skladu s priporočili Računskega sodišča;
Points out that the basic acts of the EU agencies must contain a clear definition of their tasks and competences and highlight the results-based approach of the agencies’ work;
poudarja, da morajo osnovni akti agencij EU vsebovati jasno opredelitev njihovih nalog in pristojnosti ter poudariti pristop dela agencij, ki temelji na rezultatih;
Stresses that the agencies must draw up multiannual work programmes in accordance with the multiannual Community strategy in the sector; the relevant annual work programme should set clear, specific and measurable objectives, which should then form the basis of actions, resources, approaches and timetables in order to guarantee the achievement of expected results; underlines that the work programme should respect the limits of the agency’s budget as authorised by the budgetary authority;
poudarja, da morajo agencije pripraviti večletne delovne programe v skladu z večletno strategijo Skupnosti v sektorju; zadevni letni delovni programi morajo določati jasne, specifične in merljive cilje, ki bodo osnova za ukrepe, vire, pristope in časovne razporede za zagotovitev izpolnjevanja pričakovanih rezultatov; poudarja, da mora delovni program spoštovati meje proračuna agencije, kot jih odobri proračunski organ;
Demands that the EU agencies’ management boards achieve maximum convergence between the planning of tasks and of resources (both financial and human) through the introduction of activity-based budgeting and management (ABB/ABM), and underlines that the agencies are subject to the principle of sound financial management and budgetary discipline;
zahteva, naj upravni odbori agencij EU pri načrtovanju nalog in virov (finančnih in človeških) dosežejo največjo možno skladnost z uvedbo proračunskega načrtovanja in upravljanja na podlagi dejavnosti (ABB/ABM), in poudarja, da za agencije veljata načelo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in proračunska disciplina;
Notes that the work of each agency should be accompanied by risk assessment in order to optimise expenditure as well as human resource management;
ugotavlja, da mora delo vsake agencije spremljati ocena tveganja za čim boljšo optimizacijo izdatkov in upravljanja človeških virov;
Recommends that the ECA continue the periodic performance audit of the agencies, but that it focus even more on the agencies’ internal efficiency and assess how far its recommendations are met;
priporoča, da Računsko sodišče nadaljuje z občasno revizijo agencij, a naj se še bolj osredotoči na njihovo notranjo učinkovitost in oceni, do katere mere so bila izpolnjena njegova priporočila;
Interinstitutional dialogue on a common framework for agencies
Medinstitucionalni dialog o skupnem okviru za agencije
Recalls the suggestion made in its abovementioned resolution that the interinstitutional working group address, inter alia, the need for a standard approach to the presentation of the agencies’ activities during the financial year in question;
opominja na priporočilo iz prej omenjene resolucije, da mora medinstitucionalna delovna skupina med drugim obravnavati potrebo po standardnem pristopu k predstavitvi dejavnosti agencij v zadevnem proračunskem letu;
Welcomes the decision by the Conference of Presidents taken on 18 December 2008 to nominate five Members to Parliament’s delegation to the interinstitutional working group on the role of regulatory agencies;
pozdravlja sklep konference predsednikov z 18. decembra 2008, da bo imenovala pet poslancev v delegacijo Parlamenta v medinstitucionalni delovni skupini o vlogi regulativnih agencij;
Considers its abovementioned resolution on a strategy for the future settlement of the institutional aspects of regulatory agencies as a mandate for the Parliament’s delegation working in the interinstitutional working group;
meni, da je mandat za delegacijo Parlamenta v omenjeni delovni skupini zgoraj navedena resolucija o strategiji za prihodnje reševanje institucionalnih vidikov regulativnih agencij;
Insists on the need to establish minimum common standards with regard to the setting-up of decentralised agencies in the future;
vztraja, da je treba določiti minimalne skupne standarde za ustanavljanje decentraliziranih agencij v prihodnje;
Asks the Commission and the agencies, in the meantime, to make available the financial documentation produced by the agencies in a complete, comparable and up-to-date manner on the common website launched by the Commission and the decentralised agencies on the Commission’s intranet;
poziva Komisijo in agencije, naj medtem na popoln, primerljiv in posodobljen način omogočijo dostop do finančne dokumentacije agencij na skupni spletni strani, ki so jo pripravile Komisija in decentralizirane agencije na intranetu Komisije;
Calls on the interinstitutional working group, in the light of the 2007 discharge exercise, to consider:
poziva medinstitucionalno delovno skupino, naj glede na podelitev razrešnic za leto 2007 obravnava
the reasons behind budget implementation problems, in particular the lack of a top-down approach concerning the agencies’ budgets and staffing,
razloge za težave pri izvrševanju proračuna, zlasti pomanjkanje pristopa od zgoraj navzdol pri proračunu agencij in njihovemu zaposlovanju,
the question why compliance with recruitment and procurement rules is a recurrent problem in many agencies,
vprašanje, zakaj je spoštovanje pravil zaposlovanja in javnih naročil ponavljajoč se problem v številnih agencijah,
lessons learned from the specific experience of the European Anti-Fraud Office related to agencies,
pridobljene izkušnje Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam, povezane z agencijami,
how the implementation of policies by agencies can be made more cost efficient, for example by grouping the administrative functions of various agencies together,
kako lahko agencije svoje politike izvajajo stroškovno bolj učinkovito, na primer z združitvijo upravnih funkcij različnih agencij,