natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
E. whereas AENEAS is to make a maximum contribution of EUR 30000000 to the Joint Undertaking's running costs and the Member States are to make in-kind contributions to the running costs and to provide financial contributions of at least 1,8 times the Union contribution;
E. ker naj bi prispevek združenja AENEAS znašal največ 30000000 EUR za stroške poslovanja skupnega podjetja, države članice pa morajo zagotoviti prispevke v naravi za stroške poslovanja in finančne prispevke v višini najmanj 1,8-kratnega finančnega prispevka Unije;
F. whereas the Joint Undertaking and the Artemis Joint Undertaking (‘Artemis’) were merged to create the Electronic Components and Systems for European leadership Joint Technology Initiative (‘ECSEL JTI’), which started its activities in June 2014 and will run for 10 years;
F. ker sta bili to skupno podjetje in Skupno podjetje ARTEMIS (v nadaljevanju: Artemis) združeni v skupno tehnološko pobudo Elektronske komponente in sistemi za vodilni položaj Evrope (STP ECSEL), ki je začela delovati junija 2014 in se bo izvajala deset let;
Acknowledges the fact that the Joint Undertaking's accounts for the period 1 January 2014 to 26 June 2014 present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 26 June 2014 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the period then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission's accounting officer;
ugotavlja, da zaključni račun skupnega podjetja za obdobje od 1. januarja 2014 do 26. junija 2014 v vseh pomembnih pogledih pošteno predstavlja njegov finančni položaj na dan 26. junija 2014 ter njegov poslovni izid in denarne tokove za tedaj končano obdobje, v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil in računovodskimi pravili, ki jih je sprejel računovodja Komisije;
Is concerned that the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’), in its report on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the period 1 January to 26 June 2014 (the ‘Court’s report’) issued a qualified opinion for the fourth consecutive year regarding the regularity and legality of the underlying transactions on the grounds that the administrative agreements signed with the national funding authorities (the ‘NFAs’) regarding audit of project cost claims do not include practical arrangements for ex post audits;
je zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu o zaključnem računu skupnega podjetja za obdobje od 1. januarja do 26. junija 2014 (v nadaljevanju: poročilo Računskega sodišča) četrto leto zapored izdalo mnenje s pridržkom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti povezanih transakcij, saj upravni sporazumi, podpisani z nacionalnimi organi za financiranje, v zvezi z revizijami zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov za projekte ne vključujejo praktične rešitve za naknadne revizije;
Notes that, according to the Court's report, the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of the audit reports received from the NFAs concerning the costs related to completed projects; notes, furthermore, that, after an assessment of the audit strategies of three of the NFAs, it was not possible to conclude whether ex post audits are functioning effectively due to different methodologies used by the NFAs which did not allow the Joint Undertaking to calculate either a weighted error rate or a residual rate error; notes also that ECSEL JTI confirmed that its extensive assessment of the national assurance systems concluded that they can provide reasonable protection of the financial interests of the Joint Undertakings’ members;
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje ni ocenilo kakovosti revizijskih poročil, ki jih je prejelo od nacionalnih organov za financiranje, o stroških končanih projektov; prav tako ugotavlja, da po oceni revizijskih strategij treh nacionalnih organov za financiranje ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali so naknadne revizije učinkovito delujejo, saj nacionalni organi za financiranje uporabljajo različne metodologije, zaradi česar skupno podjetje ni moglo izračunati niti ponderirane stopnje napake niti stopnje preostale napake; ugotavlja tudi, da je STP ECSEL potrdilo, da je bilo mogoče iz obširne ocene nacionalnih zavarovalnih sistemov razbrati, da lahko ti sistemi zagotavljajo primerno zaščito finančnih interesov članov skupnega podjetja;
Calls on the ECSEL JTI, following the assessment of the procedures applied by the NFAs, to invite the NFAs to produce evidence that the implementation of the national procedures provides a reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions;
na osnovi ocene postopkov, ki jih uporabljajo nacionalni organi, poziva STP ECSEL, naj te organe prosi za dokaze, da izvajanje omenjenih postopkov daje zadostno zagotovilo za zakonitost in pravilnost transakcij;
Notes that the Court's report includes a qualified opinion which is based on the lack of information necessary to calculate either a weighted error rate or a residual error rate following the ex post audits by the NFAs; invites the Court to collect additional and necessary documents and information, which the Joint Undertaking is not empowered to require, from the national audit bodies or the national competent departments in accordance with the provisions of Article 287(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; moreover, invites the Court to use those additional documents and that additional information as an alternative way to justify its opinion and to report to the discharge authority on its assessment of those additional elements;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu dalo mnenje s pridržkom, ker ni imelo potrebnih informacij za izračun ponderirane stopnje napake oziroma stopnje preostale napake na osnovi naknadnih revizij nacionalnih organov financiranja; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v skladu z določbami člena 287(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije od državnih revizijskih organov ali pristojnih državnih služb pridobi potrebne dodatne dokumente in informacije, saj skupno podjetje za to nima pooblastil; poziva ga tudi, naj te dodatne dokumente in informacije uporabi kot nadomesten vir za obrazložitev svojega mnenja in organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o svoji oceni teh dodatnih elementov;
Takes note of the fact that, according to the Court’s report, the Joint Undertaking's final budget for the financial year 2014 included commitment appropriations of EUR 2356000 and payment appropriations of EUR 76500250;
iz poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja dejstvo, da je končni proračun skupnega podjetja za proračunsko leto 2014 vključeval sredstva za prevzem obveznosti v višini 2356000 EUR in sredstva za plačila v višini 76500250 EUR;
Notes that the initial budget for 2014 included only commitment appropriations for running costs amounting to EUR 2300000 and that the budget did not include commitment appropriations for operational activities; notes, furthermore, that the utilisation rate for administrative commitment appropriations was 43 %; observes that, according to the Court’s report, those are due the merger of the Joint Undertaking and Artemis and to the fact that the budget was adopted for the whole year;
ugotavlja, da je prvotni proračun za leto 2014 vključeval zgolj sredstva za prevzem obveznosti za tekoče stroške v višini 2300000 EUR, ne pa tudi sredstev za prevzem obveznosti za operativne dejavnosti; ugotavlja tudi, da je stopnja uporabe sredstev za prevzem upravnih obveznosti znašala 43 %; iz poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da gre to pripisati združitvi skupnega podjetja in Artemisa ter dejstvu, da je bil proračun sprejet za celo leto;
Notes that, according to the Court’s report, the total amount foreseen for the calls for proposals was committed at the time of the merger;
iz poročila Računskega sodišča je seznanjen, da je bila celotna vsota, predvidena za javne razpise, dodeljena v času združitve;
Acknowledges that, according to the Joint Undertaking, national assurance procedures have been surveyed for countries receiving 54,2 % of the Joint Undertaking grants; supports its initiative to further increase the coverage; calls on ECSEL JTI to continue its assessment in order to approach the 100 % coverage of the total grants and inform the discharge authority on the advancements realised in the financial year of 2014;
je seznanjen, na podlagi trditev skupnega podjetja, da so bili nacionalni postopki zagotavljanja pregledani pri državah, ki prejemajo 54,2 % nepovratnih sredstev skupnega podjetja; podpira njegovo pobudo, da bi v pregled zajeli več nepovratnih sredstev; poziva STP ECSEL, naj nadaljuje oceno, da bi se približali stoodstotni pokritosti vseh nepovratnih sredstev, in organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o napredku iz proračunskega leta 2014;
Regrets the lack of information regarding in-kind and cash contribution; calls on the Court to include, in future reports, concrete provisions regarding the evaluation procedure and the level of in-kind and cash-paid contribution;
obžaluje, da ni informacij o prispevkih v naravi in gotovini; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v prihodnja poročila vključi konkretne določbe o postopku ocenjevanja in višini prejetih prispevkov v naravi in gotovini;
Ascertains that, according to the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts, the internal audit service did not produce new reports during the financial year of 2014, that the Joint Undertaking management took action upon all recommendations included in the previous reports, documented them and submitted them in the reporting system and that those actions concentrated in sustaining new procedures; invites the Joint Undertaking to share with the discharge authority the actions taken and the advancements made in that regard;
iz zaključnih računov skupnega podjetja ugotavlja, da služba za notranjo revizijo med proračunskim letom 2014 ni pripravila novih poročil, da je vodstvo skupnega podjetja sprejelo ukrepe v skladu z vsemi priporočili iz prejšnjih poročil, jih dokumentiralo in vključilo v sistem poročanja ter da so bili ukrepi namenjeni podpori novim postopkom; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o sprejetih ukrepih in doseženem napredku v zvezi s tem;
Takes note of the fact that the internal audit capability (‘IAC’) required improvements in the document handling recommending in particular an electronic system;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je skupina za notranjo revizijo zahtevala, da se izboljša obdelava dokumentov, in predlagala predvsem uvedbo elektronskega sistema;
Acknowledges the fact that, according to the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts, the IAC executed its approved work programme covering the legality and regularity of the administrative transactions as well as of the operational transactions executed in collaboration with the NFAs, the results being reported to the governing board and to the executive director; notes, furthermore, that opportunities for further improvement were highlighted; asks the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority on the actions taken to address this issue;
iz zaključnih računov skupnega podjetja ugotavlja dejstvo, da je skupina izvedla svoj odobreni delovni program, ki zajema zakonitost in pravilnost upravnih transakcij, pa tudi operativne transakcije, izvedene z nacionalnimi organi za financiranje, o rezultatu pa sta bila obveščena upravni odbor in izvršni direktor; je poleg tega seznanjen, da so bile poudarjene možnosti za dodatno izboljšanje; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice seznani z ukrepi, sprejetimi za obravnavo tega vprašanja;
Takes note of the fact that the 2016 Court of Auditors work programme includes a special report on performance audit of Joint Undertakings.
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da delovni program Računskega sodišča za leto 2016 vključuje posebno poročilo o reviziji uspešnosti skupnih podjetij.
Resolution (EU, Euratom) 2016/1604 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU, Euratom) 2016/1604
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy for the financial year 2014
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega skupnega podjetja za ITER in razvoj fuzijske energije za proračunsko leto 2014
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy for the financial year 2014,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega skupnega podjetja za ITER in razvoj fuzijske energije za proračunsko leto 2014,
A. whereas the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (the ‘Joint Undertaking’) was set up in March 2007 for a period of 35 years;
A. ker je bilo Evropsko skupno podjetje za ITER in razvoj fuzijske energije (v nadaljevanju: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno marca 2007 za obdobje 35 let;
B. whereas the members of the Joint Undertaking are Euratom, represented by the Commission, the Member States of Euratom, and third countries which have concluded cooperation agreements with Euratom in the field of controlled nuclear fusion;
B. ker so člani skupnega podjetja Euratom, ki ga zastopa Komisija, države članice Euratoma in tretje države, ki so sklenile sporazume o sodelovanju z Euratomom na področju nadzorovane jedrske fuzije;
C. whereas the Joint Undertaking started to work autonomously on March 2008;
C. ker je skupno podjetje začelo samostojno delovati marca 2008;
Notes that the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’), in its report on the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 (the ‘Court’s report’), stated that the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules;
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu o letnih računovodskih izkazih skupnega podjetja za proračunsko leto 2014 (v nadaljevanju: poročilo Računskega sodišča) navaja, da zaključni račun skupnega podjetja za leto 2014 v vseh pomembnih vidikih ustrezno prikazuje njegovo finančno stanje na dan 31. decembra 2014 ter rezultate njegovega poslovanja in njegove denarne tokove za leto, ki se je takrat končalo, v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil;
Notes that the institutions and bodies are required to produce each year a report on budgetary and financial management and that the information provided by the Joint Undertaking in that report lacked harmonisation and was often incomplete; notes that guidance is required from the Commission as to the nature and content of that report;
ugotavlja, da morajo institucije in organi poročilo o upravljanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju pripraviti vsako leto in da so informacije, ki jih je v poročilu navedlo skupno podjetje, neusklajene in pogosto nepopolne; meni, da bi morala Komisija zagotoviti navodila o naravi in vsebini tega poročila;
Notes that the Court's report emphasised the fact that the Council conclusions adopted on 7 July 2010 [1] approved EUR 6600000000 (in 2008 values) for the Joint Undertaking contribution to the ITER construction phase of the project; notes that that figure, which doubled the initial budgeted costs for this phase of the project, did not include EUR 663000000 proposed by the Commission in 2010 to cover potential contingencies; acknowledges that the ITER Organisation set up a Reserve Fund with the aim of providing a clearer mechanism that compensates the domestic agencies for design changes and provides incentives for the internal organisation to adopt solutions that minimise costs in an attempt to rectify the weakness identified by 2013 ITER Management Assessment [2]; considers that the significant increase of the project costs may put in danger other programmes which are also financed by the Union budget and may be contradictory to the ‘value-for-money’ principle;
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu poudarja, da je bil s sklepi Sveta, sprejetimi 7. julija 2010 [1], za prispevek skupnega podjetja za gradbeno fazo projekta ITER odobren znesek v višini 6600000000 EUR (v vrednosti iz leta 2008); ugotavlja, da ta znesek, s katerim se podvojijo stroški za to fazo projekta, ki so bili prvotno predvideni v proračunu, ne vključuje 663000000 EUR, ki jih je za kritje nepredvidenih stroškov leta 2010 predlagala Komisija; priznava, da je organizacija ITER oblikovala rezervni sklad, da bi zagotovila jasnejši mehanizem za nadomestila nacionalnim agencijam zaradi sprememb zasnove in za spodbujanje notranje organizacije k sprejemanju rešitev, ki bi čim bolj zmanjšale stroške, s čimer je poskušala odpraviti slabosti, ugotovljene v oceni vodstva projekta ITER iz leta 2013 [2]; meni, da bi lahko znatno povečanje stroškov tega projekta ogrozilo druge programe, ki se tudi financirajo iz proračuna Unije, in bi lahko bilo v nasprotju z načelom stroškovne učinkovitosti;
Notes with concern that the complexity of the Joint Undertaking’s activities implies that the amount of the contribution to the construction phase of the project by the Joint Undertaking is exposed to significant risks of increase; observes that those risks mainly result from changes in the scope of the project deliverables and delays in the current schedule which was considered to be unrealistic and that the release of a new ITER Organisation action plan, including scope, schedule and costs (the ‘new ITER action plan’), by the Council of the ITER Organisation (‘ITER Council’), planned for June 2015, was postponed until November 2015 and is now scheduled for mid-2016; notes, furthermore, that the delay for the construction phase of the project was estimated by the Joint Undertaking at the time of the audit to be at least 43 months; acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking is already adopting a stringent policy regarding the above and is refraining from proceeding with procurement actions until the specifications for contracts are sufficiently stable; notes, moreover, that the Joint Undertaking has reviewed the procurement schedules for all systems to ensure that the activity durations are correct and that the planned work is achievable given the available resources within the organisation [3];
je zaskrbljen zaradi občutnih tveganj, da se bo zaradi kompleksnosti dejavnosti skupnega podjetja povečal znesek njegovega prispevka za gradbeno fazo projekta; opaža, da so ta tveganja zlasti posledica sprememb obsega rezultatov projekta in zamud v sedanjem časovnem načrtu, ki je veljal za nerealističnega, in da je svet Mednarodne organizacije za fuzijsko energijo ITER (v nadaljevanju: svet organizacije ITER) odložil objavo novega akcijskega načrta organizacije ITER (v nadaljevanju: akcijski načrt ITER), ki naj bi vključeval obseg, časovni načrt in stroške, in sicer z junija 2015, kot je bilo sprva načrtovano, najprej na november 2015, sedaj pa sredino leta 2016; nadalje opaža, da je skupno podjetje zamudo gradbene faze projekta v času revizije ocenilo na vsaj 43 mesecev; priznava, da v zvezi z navedenim skupno podjetje že sprejema strogo politiko in ne izvaja javnih naročil, dokler se specifikacije za pogodbe ne bodo v zadostni meri ustalile; poleg tega ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje revidiralo časovne načrte javnih naročil za vse sisteme, da bi zagotovilo pravilnost trajanja dejavnosti in uresničljivost načrtovanega dela glede na razpoložljive vire v organizaciji [3];
Takes note of the fact that the latest estimate of the shortfall (negative contingency) until the finalisation of the construction phase, calculated by the Joint Undertaking in November 2014, was EUR 428000000 (2008 values); acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking is currently working on a more accurate and updated estimate through cost-containment measures and that cost control will continue to be a priority at global project management level under the leadership of the new Director-General of the ITER Organisation; points out that during the meeting of the Committee on Budgetary Control held on 22 February 2016 the Commission publically stated that it ‘rejected’ the proposal of the action plan made by the new Director-General of the ITER Organisation; notes, furthermore, that the Joint Undertaking has implemented a central system to manage costing data in order to maintain close control of the evolution of the budget and to monitor cost deviations on a regular basis [4];
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je v zadnji oceni primanjkljaj (negativni nepredvideni stroški) do zaključka gradbene faze, ki ga je novembra 2014 izračunalo Skupno podjetje, znašal 428000000 EUR (vrednosti iz leta 2008); priznava, da skupno podjetje trenutno poskuša pridobiti natančnejšo in posodobljeno oceno z ukrepi obvladovanja stroškov ter da bo obvladovanje stroškov naprej prednostna naloga na ravni celotnega upravljanja projekta pod vodstvom novega generalnega direktorja organizacije ITER; poudarja, da je Komisija na seji Odbora za proračunski nadzor 22. februarja 2016 javno izjavila, da je „zavrnila“ predlog akcijskega načrta, ki ga je pripravil novi generalni direktor organizacije ITER; opaža tudi, da je skupno podjetje uvedlo osrednji sistem za upravljanje podatkov o razčlenitvi stroškov, da bi ohranilo tesnejši nadzor nad spremembami proračuna in redno spremljalo odstopanja stroškov [4];
Urges the new Director-General of the ITER Organisation to present publically the new ITER action plan; expects the new ITER action plan to avoid clearly any further delay or additional costs to the ITER Project;
poziva novega generalnega direktorja organizacije ITER, naj javno predstavi novi akcijski načrt za ITER; pričakuje, da se bo ta načrt jasno izognil vsem nadaljnjim zamudam oziroma dodatnim stroškom za projekt ITER;
Calls on the Joint Undertaking to participate actively in the new ITER action plan, which should include the schedule and scope of the project; expects the new ITER action plan to additionally include measures to tackle all observations acknowledged by the Court;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj dejavno sodeluje pri novem akcijskem načrtu za ITER, ki bi moral vključevati časovni načrt in obseg projekta; pričakuje, da bo novi akcijski načrt za ITER vključeval tudi ukrepe za spoprijemanje z vsemi pripombami Računskega sodišča.