natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
add to the listing of the Inspection Centre Skutvik under BIP Ålesund the additional categories of chilled, packed fishery products, HC-T(CH)(1)(2)(3) and liquid fats, oils, fish oil for human and non-human consumption, HC-NT(6) and NHC-NT(6),
se na seznam kontrolnega središča Skutvik v okviru MKT Ålesund dodajo kategorije ohlajenih pakiranih ribiških proizvodov (HC-T(CH)(1)(2)(3)) in tekoče maščobe, olja, ribja olja, ki so primerna in ki niso primerna za prehrano ljudi (HC-NT(6) ter NHC-NT(6)),
add to the listing of the BIP Kirkenes the product category packed fishery products for human consumption to be stored at ambient temperature HC-NT(1)(2)(3),
se na seznam MKT Kirkenes doda kategorija proizvodov pakiranih ribiških proizvodov, ki so primerna za prehrano ljudi in se shranjujejo pri sobni temperaturi (HC-NT(1)(2)(3)),
add to the listing a new BIP with a new TRACES code, the BIP Larvik (TRACES code NO LAR 1), type P with the product category packed products for human consumption,
se na seznam doda nova MKT z novo oznako TRACES, in sicer MKT Larvik (oznaka TRACES NO LAR 1) tip P s kategorijo proizvodov pakiranih proizvodov za prehrano ljudi,
add to the listing a new BIP with a new TRACES code, the BIP Florø (TRACES code NO FRO 1), type P with the product category fish oil and fishmeal not intended for human consumption.
se na seznam doda nova MKT z novo oznako TRACES, in sicer MKT Florø (oznaka TRACES NO FRO 1) vrste P s kategorijo proizvodov ribjih olj in ribje moke, ki niso primerna za prehrano ljudi.
The BIP should be listed as NHC-NT(6)(16).
MKT mora biti navedena kot NHC-NT(6)(16).
The Authority, by its Decision No 467/10/COL referred the matter to the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority.
Nadzorni organ je s svojo odločbo št. 467/10/COL predložil zadevo Veterinarskemu odboru Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu Efte.
Veterinary checks on live animals and animal products brought into Iceland and Norway from third countries shall be carried out by the competent national authorities at the agreed border inspection posts listed in the Annex to this Decision.
Veterinarske preglede živih živali in živalskih proizvodov, vnesenih na Islandijo in Norveško iz tretjih držav, opravljajo pristojni državni organi na dogovorjenih MKT, ki so navedene v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 43/10/COL of 10 February 2010 is hereby repealed.
Odločba Nadzornega organa Efte št. 43/10/COL z dne 10. februarja 2010 se razveljavi.
This Decision shall enter into force on 26 January 2011.
Ta odločba začne veljati 26. januarja 2011.
OJ L 256, 30.9.2010, p. 30 and EEA Supplement No 53, 30.9.2010, p. 1.
UL L 256, 30.9.2010, str. 30. in Dopolnilo EGP št. 53, 30.9.2010, str. 1.
OJ L 41, 12.2.2009, p. 28 and EEA Supplement No 7, 12.2.2009, p. 6.
UL L 41, 12.2.2009, str. 28. in Dopolnilo EGP št. 7, 12.2.2009, str. 6.
Nagylak HU: This is a border inspection post (for products) and crossing point (for Live animals) on the Hungarian Romanian border, subject to transitional measures as negotiated and laid down in the Treaty of Accession for both products and live animals.
Nagylak HU: To je mejna kontrolna točka (za proizvode) in prehodna točka (za žive živali) na madžarsko-romunski meji, za katero veljajo prehodni ukrepi, kakor so bili dogovorjeni in določeni v Pogodbi o pristopu, tako za proizvode kot za žive živali.
Designated for transit across the European Community for consignments of certain products of animal origin for human consumption, coming to or from Russia under the specific procedures foreseen in relevant Community legislation
določeno za tranzit preko Evropske skupnosti za pošiljke nekaterih proizvodov živalskega izvora za prehrano ljudi, ki prihajajo v Rusijo ali iz Rusije po posebnih postopkih, predvidenih v ustrezni zakonodaji Skupnosti
No 57/11/COL
št. 57/11/COL
amending, for the 82nd time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by introducing a new chapter on the application, from 1 January 2011, of State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis
o dvainosemdeseti spremembi procesnih in materialnih pravil na področju državne pomoči z vključitvijo novega poglavja o uporabi predpisov o državnih pomočeh v podporo ukrepom v korist bankam ob trenutni finančni in gospodarski krizi, od 1. januarja 2011 dalje
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY (‘the Authority’),
NADZORNI ORGAN EFTE (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Nadzorni organ) JE –,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), in particular to Articles 61,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP), ter zlasti člena 61 Sporazuma,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (‘the Surveillance and Court Agreement’), in particular to Article 24 and Article 5(2)(b),
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču), in zlasti člena 24 in člena 5(2)(b) Sporazuma,
WHEREAS under Article 5(2)(b) of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the Authority shall issue notices or guidelines on matters dealt with in the EEA Agreement, if that Agreement or the Surveillance and Court Agreement expressly so provides or if the Authority considers it necessary,
KER v skladu s členom 5(2)(b) Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču Nadzorni organ izda obvestila ali smernice o zadevah, ki jih obravnava Sporazum EGP, če to izrecno določata navedeni sporazum ali Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču ali če Nadzorni organ meni, da je to potrebno,
WHEREAS, on 1 December 2010, the European Commission adopted a Communication on the application, from 1 January 2011, of State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis [1],WHEREAS this Communication is also of relevance for the European Economic Area,
KER je 1. decembra 2010 Evropska komisija sprejela Sporočilo o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za podporne ukrepe v korist bank v okviru finančne krize od 1. januarja 2011 dalje [1]KER to sporočilo velja tudi za Evropski gospodarski prostor,
WHEREAS uniform application of the EEA State aid rules is to be ensured throughout the European Economic Area in line with the objective of homogeneity established in Article 1 of the EEA Agreement,
KER je treba enotno uporabo predpisov o državnih pomočeh EGP zagotoviti po celotnem Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru v skladu s ciljem homogenosti iz člena 1 Sporazuma EGP,
WHEREAS, according to point II under the heading ‘GENERAL’ on page 11 of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, the Authority, after consultation with the Commission, is to adopt acts corresponding to those adopted by the European Commission,
KER mora v skladu s točko II pod naslovom „SPLOŠNO“ na strani 11 Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP Nadzorni organ po posvetovanju s Komisijo sprejeti akte, ki ustrezajo tistim, ki jih je sprejela Evropska komisija,
HAVING consulted the EFTA States by letters dated 10 February 2011 on the subject,
PO POSVETOVANJU z državami Efte glede zadeve v dopisih z dne 10. februarja 2011 –
The State Aid Guidelines shall be amended by introducing a new chapter on the application, from 1 January 2011, of State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis.
Smernice o državnih pomočeh se spremenijo tako, da se vstavi novo poglavje o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za podporne ukrepe v korist bank v okviru finančne krize od 1. januarja 2011 dalje.
The new chapter is set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Novo poglavje je v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
Only the English version of this Decision is authentic.
Besedilo te odločbe v angleškem jeziku je edino verodostojno.
OJ C 329, 7.12.2010, p. 7.
UL C 329, 7.12.2010, str. 7.
THE APPLICATION, FROM 1 JANUARY 2011, OF STATE AID RULES TO SUPPORT MEASURES IN FAVOUR OF BANKS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS
UPORABA PRAVIL O DRŽAVNI POMOČI ZA PODPORNE UKREPE V KORIST BANK V OKVIRU FINANČNE KRIZE OD 1. JANUARJA 2011 DALJE
Since the beginning of the global financial crisis in the autumn of 2008, the EFTA Surveillance Authority (‘the Authority’) has adopted four sets of Guidelines [1] which provide detailed guidance on the criteria for the compatibility of State support to financial institutions [2] with the requirements of Article 61(3)(b) of the Agreement on the European Economic Area ( ‘the EEA Agreement’).
Od začetka svetovne finančne krize jeseni 2008 je Nadzorni organ Efte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Nadzorni organ) sprejel štiri sklope smernic [1], v katerih je predvidel podrobna navodila glede meril združljivosti državnih pomoči finančnim institucijam [2] z zahtevami iz člena 61(3)(b) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP).
The chapters of the Guidelines in question are the application of State aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions [3] (‘the Banking Guidelines’); the recapitalisation of financial institutions in the current financial crisis [4] (‘the Recapitalisation Guidelines’); the treatment of impaired assets in the EEA banking sector [5] (‘the Impaired Assets Guidelines’) and return to viability and the assessment of restructuring measures in the financial sector in the current crisis under the State aid rules [6] (‘the Restructuring Guidelines’).
Poglavja zadevnih smernic so uporaba pravil o državnih pomočeh za ukrepe v zvezi s finančnimi institucijami [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: smernice o bančništvu); dokapitalizacija finančnih institucij ob trenutni finančni krizi [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: smernice o dokapitalizaciji); obravnava oslabljenih sredstev v bančnem sektorju EGP [5] (smernice o oslabljenih sredstvih) in ponovna sposobnost za uspešno poslovanje ter ocena ukrepov prestrukturiranja v finančnem sektorju v trenutni finančni krizi v okviru pravil o državnih pomočeh [6] (smernice o prestrukturiranju).
Three of those four Guidelines, the Banking, Recapitalisation and Impaired Assets Guidelines, set out the prerequisites for the compatibility of the main types of assistance granted by EFTA States — guarantees on liabilities, recapitalisations and asset relief measures — while the Restructuring Guidelines detail the particular features that a restructuring plan (or a viability plan) has to display in the specific context of crisis-related State aid granted to financial institutions on the basis of Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement.
Tri od štirih smernic, in sicer smernice o bančništvu, dokapitalizaciji in oslabljenih sredstvih, določajo pogoje skladnosti glavnih vrst pomoči držav Efte – jamstev za obveznosti, dokapitalizacije in ukrepov finančne pomoči za oslabljena sredstva – medtem ko smernice o prestrukturiranju podrobno določajo, kakšne posebne lastnosti mora imeti načrt prestrukturiranja (ali načrt za uspešno poslovanje) v primeru državne pomoči, povezane s kriznimi ukrepi in dodeljene finančnim institucijam na podlagi člena 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP.
All four chapters of the Guidelines highlight the temporary nature of the acceptability of such aid measures; each states that any such aid measure can only be justified as an emergency response to the unprecedented stress in financial markets and only as long as those exceptional circumstances prevail.
Vsa štiri poglavja smernic poudarjajo, da so takšni ukrepi pomoči sprejemljivi le začasno; v vsakem od njih je navedeno, da je mogoče takšne ukrepe pomoči utemeljiti le kot izredni odziv na pritiske na finančnih trgih, kakršnih pred tem še nismo imeli, in le dokler obstajajo izredne razmere.
The Restructuring Guidelines are valid for restructuring aid notified by 31 December 2010 whilst the other Guidelines do not have an expiry date.
Smernice o prestrukturiranju veljajo za pomoč za prestrukturiranje, priglašeno do 31. decembra 2010, ostale smernice pa nimajo datuma prenehanja veljavnosti.
These Guidelines set out the parameters for the temporary acceptability of crisis-related assistance to banks as from 1 January 2011.
V teh smernicah so določeni parametri začasne sprejemljivosti pomoči bankam, povezane s kriznimi ukrepi, od 1. januarja 2011 dalje.
The continued applicability of Article 61(3)(b) EEA and the extension of the Restructuring Guidelines
Nadaljnja uporaba člena 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP in podaljšanje veljavnosti smernic o prestrukturiranju
The Authority’s Guidelines on crisis-related aid to banks, as well as all individual decisions on aid measures and schemes falling within the scope of those Guidelines, are adopted on the legal basis of Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement, which exceptionally allows for aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of an EFTA State.
Pravna podlaga za smernice Nadzornega organa o pomoči bankam, povezani s kriznimi ukrepi, ter vse posamezne sklepe o ukrepih in shemah pomoči, ki spadajo na področje uporabe teh smernic, je člen 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP, ki izjemoma dovoljuje pomoč za odpravljanje resne motnje v gospodarstvu države Efte.
In the most acute stage of the crisis, the condition of a serious disturbance was unquestionably met across the EEA in view of the extraordinary stress in financial markets, later combined with an exceptionally severe contraction in the real economy.
V času največje krize je bil pogoj obstoja resnih motenj brez dvoma izpolnjen na vsem EGP, če upoštevamo izredne pritiske na finančnih trgih, ki jih je pozneje spremljalo še izjemno resno krčenje realnega gospodarstva.
The economic recovery, which has slowly taken hold since the beginning of 2010, has been proceeding at a somewhat faster pace than expected earlier in 2010.
Okrevanje gospodarstva, ki se je počasi stabiliziralo od začetka leta 2010, se je nadaljevalo nekoliko hitreje kot je bilo pričakovano v prvi polovici leta 2010.
While recovery is still fragile and uneven across the EEA, some states are showing modest or even more robust growth rates.
Medtem ko je okrevanje še vedno krhko in neenako širom EGP, nekatere države beležijo skromno ali celo trdnejšo rast.
In addition, despite some pockets of vulnerability, in broad terms the health of the banking sector has improved compared with the situation one year ago.
Poleg tega se je v primerjavi z lanskim letom stabilnost bančnega sektorja, z izjemo nekaterih ranljivih delov, na splošno izboljšala.
As a result, the existence of a serious disturbance in the economy of the EFTA States is no longer as self-evident as in earlier stages of the crisis.
Obstoj resne motnje v gospodarstvu vseh držav Efte zato ni več tako očiten, kot je bil v začetnih fazah krize.
While it is aware of those developments, the Authority still considers that the requirements for State aid to be approved pursuant to Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement are fulfilled in view of the recent reappearance of stress in financial markets and the risk of wider negative spill-over effects, for the reasons set out in these Guidelines.
Nadzorni organ je seznanjen s tem razvojem, še vedno pa iz razlogov iz teh smernic meni, da so pogoji za odobritev državne pomoči v skladu s členom 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP izpolnjeni, glede na nedavno ponovitev negotovosti na finančnih trgih in možne negativne učinke na druga področja.
The re-emergence of tensions in sovereign debt markets forcefully illustrates the continued volatility in financial markets.
Ponovitev napetosti zaradi državnega dolga jasno kaže nestanovitnost finančnih trgov.
The high level of interconnectedness and interdependence within the financial sector in the EEA has given rise to market concerns about contagion.
Visoka stopnja povezanosti in soodvisnosti znotraj finančnega sektorja v EGP je povzročila zaskrbljenost trgov glede tveganja prenosa.
The high volatility of financial markets and the uncertainty about the economic outlook justifies maintaining, as a safety net, the possibility for EFTA States to argue the need to have recourse to crisis-related support measures on the basis of Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement.
Krhko stabilnost, ki so jo dosegli finančni trgi in nezanesljivost gospodarskega okrevanja kot varovalo upravičujejo ohranitev možnosti za države Efte, da uveljavljajo potrebo po podpornih ukrepih, povezanih s krizo, na podlagi člena 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP.
The temporal scope of the Restructuring Guidelines — the only one of the four Guidelines with a specified expiry date, 31 December 2010 — should therefore be extended to restructuring aid notified by 31 December 2011.
Časovni okvir veljavnosti smernic o prestrukturiranju, edinih izmed štirih relevantnih smernic, ki so časovno omejene – do 31. decembra 2010 – je treba zato podaljšati, da bodo veljale tudi za pomoč za prestrukturiranje, priglašeno do 31. decembra 2011.
The Guidelines, however, need to be adapted with a view of preparing the transition to the post-crisis regime.
Vendar pa je treba smernice prilagoditi, da se pripravi prehod na ureditev po krizi.
It must be addressed by setting the requirements for the compatibility of such assistance in a way that best prepares for the new regime for the rescue and restructuring of banks based on Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement.
Pri tem je treba določiti zahteve glede združljivosti take pomoči, ki bodo najbolje ustrezale novi ureditvi reševanja in prestrukturiranja bank na podlagi člena 61(3)(c) Sporazuma EGP.
The advancement of the exit process
Spodbujanje izstopa
The continued availability of aid measures pursuant to Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement in the face of exceptional market conditions should not obstruct the process of disengagement from temporary extraordinary support measures for banks.
Z nadaljnjimi ukrepi pomoči v skladu s členom 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP ob izrednih tržnih pogojih se ne sme ovirati proces opuščanja uporabe začasnih izrednih podpornih ukrepov za banke.
At its meeting on 2 December 2009 the Economic and Financial Affairs Council concluded on the necessity to design a strategy for the phasing out of support measures which should be transparent and duly coordinated among EU Member States to avoid negative spill-over effects but take into account the different specific circumstances across EU Member States [7].
Ekonomsko-finančni svet je 2. decembra 2009 na svojem sestanku sklenil, da je treba pripraviti strategijo za postopno prenehanje uporabe podpornih ukrepov, ki mora biti pregledna in ustrezno usklajena med državami članicami EU, da bi se izognili negativnim učinkom na druga področja, hkrati pa upoštevali različne posebne okoliščine v državah članicah EU [7].
The conclusions further set out that, in principle, the phasing-out process concerning the various forms of assistance to banks should start with the unwinding of government guarantee schemes, encouraging the exit of sound banks and inducing other banks to address their weaknesses.
V sklepih je bilo tudi navedeno, da naj bi se proces postopnega prenehanja uporabe različnih oblik pomoči bankam načeloma začel s prenehanjem uporabe shem državnih jamstev, spodbujanjem izstopa trdnih bank in spodbujanjem drugih bank, da odpravijo svoje pomanjkljivosti.
In the following paragraphs, the Authority will set out the steps of a gradual phasing out with regard to recapitalisation and impaired asset measures.
V naslednjih odstavkih Nadzorni svet navaja korake postopnega prenehanja uporabe pomoči v zvezi z dokapitalizacijo in ukrepi za oslabljena sredstva.
Tighter conditions for the compatibility of government guarantees under Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement
Strožji pogoji glede združljivosti državnih jamstev v skladu s členom 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP
From 1 January 2011 the Authority will apply tighter conditions for the compatibility of government guarantees under Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement by introducing an increased guarantee fee and the requirement of a viability plan for beneficiaries that have recourse to new guarantees and exceed a certain threshold of total outstanding guaranteed liabilities both in absolute terms and in relation to total liabilities [8].
Nadzorni organ od 1. januarja 2011 uporablja strožje pogoje glede združljivosti državnih jamstev v skladu s členom 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP z uvedbo večjih provizij za jamstva in nove zahteve glede načrta za uspešno poslovanje za upravičence, ki uporabljajo nova jamstva in presegajo določen prag skupnih neporavnanih zajamčenih obveznosti v absolutnem smislu in v razmerju do skupnih obveznosti [8].
Considering the current market these conditions appear necessary at present.
Glede na sedanje stanje na trgu se ti pogoji trenutno zdijo nujni.
Pricing conditions
Pogoji določanja cen
Access to the government guarantees has been subject to a fee, which is determined following the ECB recommendations.
Za dostop do državnih jamstev je treba plačati provizijo, katere višina se določi v skladu s priporočili ECB.
In the case of a bond with maturity over one year, the fee comprises a flat charge of 50 basis points augmented by each bank’s median five-year senior debt credit default swap (‘CDS’) spread observed in the period 1 January 2007 to 31 August 2008 [9].
Pri obveznicah z dospelostjo višjo od enega leta provizija vključuje pavšalni znesek v višini 50 bazičnih točk, ki se poveča za povprečni petletni razpon poslov zamenjav dolgov, ki se prednostno poplačujejo, ki jih banka opravi v obdobju med 1. januarjem 2007 in 31. avgustom 2008 [9].
Up to now, this has been considered necessary to facilitate banks’ access to external funding and thereby safeguard financial stability.
Do zdaj se je to štelo za potrebno, da se bankam olajša dostop do zunanjega financiranja in tako zavaruje njihovo finančno stabilnost.
However, financial-market developments in the two years since 31 August 2008, including changes in the banks’ credit status, are not taken into account.
Vendar pri tem ni bil upoštevan razvoj finančnih trgov v dveh letih od 31. avgusta 2008, vključno z spremembami kreditnega statusa bank.
Thus, while access to market financing has generally improved, banks which have been downgraded are still benefiting from their pre-crisis credit rating and perceived creditworthiness.
Tako imajo banke, katerim je bila znižana bonitetna ocena, kljub splošnemu izboljšanju dostopa do tržnega financiranja še vedno koristi od svoje bonitetne ocene in kreditne sposobnosti iz obdobja pred krizo.
This increases the likelihood of competition distortions.
To povečuje verjetnost izkrivljanja konkurence.
Evidence shows that banks with low rating benefit disproportionately more from guarantees than banks with higher rating because they would normally pay a higher market price due to their low rating.
Iz dokazov je razvidno, da imajo banke s slabo bonitetno oceno nesorazmerno večje koristi od jamstev kot banke z višjo bonitetno oceno, ker bi zaradi slabe bonitetne ocene navadno plačale višjo tržno ceno.
In order to address these distortions, the pricing of government support should be brought closer to current market conditions, better reflecting individual banks’ current creditworthiness.
Da bi se ta izkrivljanja odpravila, bi se morale cene državne podpore približati sedanjim tržnim pogojem, s čimer bi se pokazala bolj realna slika kreditne sposobnosti posameznih bank.
De facto, this requires that the guarantee fee payable by beneficiary institutions would be increased.
Dejansko bi se morala za to provizija za jamstva, ki jo plačajo institucije upravičenke, povišati.
A coordinated approach among EFTA States should promote a gradual phasing out of guarantee schemes while retaining a certain degree of flexibility to take account of the different situations of EFTA States and their banks.
Usklajen pristop držav Efte bi moral spodbuditi postopno opuščanje jamstvenih shem, hkrati pa bi se ohranila določena stopnja prožnosti glede upoštevanja različnih razmer v državah Efte in položaja bank.
To this end, the Authority considers it appropriate to introduce a minimum increase in the fee for guarantees that should be differentiated according to the beneficiary bank's creditworthiness.
Nadzorni organ zato meni, da je ustrezno provizije za jamstva minimalno povečati in jih razlikovati glede na kreditno sposobnost bank upravičenk.