natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in all governance areas covered by the Union cooperation strategy, systematically consider the need to support the fight against fraud and corruption, as well as the reform of the judiciary;
do konca leta 2014 zahteva forenzično revizijo izplačevanja neposredne finančne podpore PEGASE, da se zagotovi, da se sredstva ne bodo nezakonito izplačevala oziroma nakazovala neupravičenim skupinam, in vztraja, naj si Komisija in Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje prizadevata za polno sodelovanje s palestinskimi oblastmi, da se prepreči možno preusmerjanje finančnih sredstev PEGASE; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj zagotovi pomoč pri uporabi ustrezne revizorske metodologije;
The Commission should:
je zaskrbljen tudi zaradi ugotovitev Računskega sodišča o rastočem številu palestinskih javnih uslužbencev v Gazi, ki prejemajo plačo iz neposredne finančne podpore PEGASE, a ne hodijo na delo; zato izraža pohvalo za spremembo teh programov z namenom trajnostne zaposlitvene perspektive in administrativnega izboljšanja;
at the outset of programmes and regularly during their implementation, assess the likelihood and potential impact of the main risks to the achievement of programme objectives; notes that this will involve (i) appraising the relevance and credibility of the country’s policies and action plans for improving governance in relation to the available institutional and financial resources and (ii) monitoring progress against commitments made by the DRC authorities;
poziva Komisijo in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj s palestinskimi oblastmi nemudoma obravnavata potrebo po učinkovitem notranjem kontrolnem mehanizmu, da se prepreči vsakršno preusmerjanje javnih finančnih sredstev iz palestinskega proračuna oziroma neposredne finančne podpore PEGASE fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, ki zastopajo Hamas, ki ga je Unija že leta 2003 uvrstila na seznam terorističnih organizacij, oziroma so povezane z njim;
establish measures to prevent or mitigate risks and clearly define the course of action to be followed if risks become reality, bearing in mind the risks of fraud and corruption in particular;
priznava omejitve, ki jih palestinskim oblastem postavlja izraelska vlada, med drugim:
focus objectives on a limited number of priorities;
z začasnimi ustavitvami nakazil carinskih prihodkov, ki so posredni davki, ki jih v imenu palestinskih oblasti pobira Izrael za uvoženo blago in ki predstavljajo 70 % palestinskega proračuna;
set out a time frame, including mid-term evaluations, which is better adapted to the programme environment;
s slabo preglednostjo v zvezi z zneski pristojbin, ki jih Izrael odbije za blago in storitve, ki jih zaračunava palestinskim oblastem;
provide for flexibility during programme implementation so that objectives can be reviewed promptly where appropriate;
s tem, da Izrael še naprej nadzira celotno območje C Zahodnega brega, kar je velika ovira za dolgoročni in trajnostni razvoj Palestinske nacionalne oblasti;
The Commission and the EEAS should:
z omejitvami, ki jih izraelska vlada vsiljuje palestinskim podjetjem in so opisane v revizijskem poročilu Računskega sodišča;
strengthen their structured political and policy dialogue with the country; notes that this will involve, in full respect of the provisions of the Cotonou Agreement (notably article 96) (i) setting clear, relevant, realistic and time-bound targets which are mutually agreed upon with the national authorities, (ii) periodically assessing compliance with the agreed targets as part of the regular political dialogue with the government, and (iii) if the DRC government shows insufficient commitment to compliance, consider, after careful deliberation, adapting or in exceptional cases, suspending or terminating the programme;
286.
urge the DRC government to adopt the necessary measures for improving, where necessary, the functioning of the thematic working groups, and monitor the implementation of those measures;
Evropsko komisijo in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje poziva, naj glede teh vprašanj še naprej sodelujeta z izraelsko vlado in jo stalno opominjata na njene obveznosti, ki ji jih kot okupacijski sili nalaga mednarodno pravo;
take a more active leadership role towards Member States to encourage coordinated policy dialogue and increase Union leverage over the DRC government;
poziva Komisijo in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj pri reviziji mehanizma neposredne finančne pomoči PEGASE v prihodnje v celoti upoštevata ugotovitve in zaključke Računskega sodišča ter v celoti uresničita njegova priporočila;
provide Parliament by May 2014 with an overview of the state of play of the projects visited by the Court of Auditors, and
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče priporoča, naj ESZD in Evropska komisija ob priložnostih, ki jih ponujata novo programsko obdobje 2014–2020 in nov akcijski načrt EU in palestinskih oblasti, temeljito pregledata PEGASE in pri tem upoštevata točke v naslednjem odstavku;
provide Parliament by June 2014 with an overview of all on-going projects in DRC and inform it on how much money will be still available and from which funds;
meni, da bi morali ESZD in Komisija okrepiti programsko načrtovanje prihodnje neposredne finančne podpore PEGASE, zlasti tako, da:
Part XXIV
jo tesneje povežeta z novim akcijskim načrtom EU in palestinskih oblasti;
Special Report No 10/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Common Agricultural Policy: Is the specific support provided under Article 68 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 well designed and implemented?’
dodeljevanje sredstev načrtujeta na večletni osnovi;
Specific support for certain agricultural activities should be based on a strict understanding of the provisions of Article 68 and the new delegated acts should require that the granting of such coupled support should be adequately justified to the Commission and checked by it; notes that to be able to assume its ultimate responsibility under the system of shared management, the Commission should play a more active role in establishing the criteria governing the implementation of the measures, and in assessing measures in a comparative way to avoid unexplained and extreme variations in prices, such as those identified in the examples for goats in this Special Report; notes that the legal tools to do this should be established in the new delegated acts; notes that the Member States should be required, in the new delegated acts, to demonstrate that each specific support measure which they intend to introduce is necessary (in terms of the need for and added value of an approach based on derogations), relevant (in terms of implementation arrangements, award criteria and aid levels), and that it satisfies the criteria of sound financial management; in particular and in response to the point expressed by the Court of Auditors that ‘clearly defined cases’ were not clearly defined, implementation of the new Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [30] should overcome the problems identified, by Member States:
razvijeta kazalnike uspešnosti, zlasti na področju zdravstva, izobraževanja in upravljanja javnih financ, da bosta lahko bolje ocenili in prikazali rezultate podpore;
establishing clear targets (as per Financial Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012);
oblikujeta učinkovit notranji kontrolni mehanizem, da se zagotovi spoštovanje meril za izplačilo in prepreči preusmerjanje neposredne finančne podpore PEGASE;
creating systematic monitoring systems for all measures taken under the new Articles 52-55 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013;
meni, da bi morala Komisija zmanjšati stroške upravljanja neposredne finančne podpore PEGASE, tako da:
respecting uniformity in application across the Union so that management and control systems can be streamlined, simple, and comparable;
kadar koli je mogoče, uporabi konkurenčne razpisne postopke za naročila v zvezi z upravljanjem neposredne finančne podpore PEGASE in nadzorom nad njo;
ensuring documentation of all measures/sub-measures and the use of up to date integrated administration control system (IACS) information where relevant;
poenostavi sistem za upravljanje neposredne finančne podpore PEGASE, tako da odgovornost za upravljanje podatkovne zbirke PEGASE prenese na predstavništvo Unije v Palestini, ki naj prevzame tudi nekatere preglede, ki jih zdaj izvajajo zunanji izvajalci;
establishing rigorous on-the-spot checks at regional and Member State level;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču Evropske unije in Evropskemu računskemu sodišču ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
Taking account of the variety of possible measures an appropriate system of monitoring should be established to facilitate subsequent evaluation;
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2014)0287 (glej stran 30 tega Uradnega lista).
Once measures have been introduced, the Member States should establish suitable and comprehensive management and control systems to ensure that all the requirements of the Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 can be satisfied; notes that in order to avoid generating disproportionate costs on the limited scale of a specific support measure, the requirement for controls should already be taken into account during the measure’s design phase (simplicity of implementation, ‘controllability’ of criteria, etc.) or possibly even in the decision on whether or not to introduce a given measure;
Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija (WHO) ocenjuje, da bi bilo mogoče 6,3 % smrtnih primerov na svetu (8 %, če upoštevamo samo države v razvoju) preprečiti z izboljšanjem oskrbe z vodo, sanitarnih storitev in higiene.
Part XXV
Večina teh smrtnih primerov, ki bi jih bilo mogoče preprečiti, so otroci iz držav v razvoju.
Special Report No 12/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Can the Commission and Member States show that the EU budget allocated to the rural development policy is well spent?’
Uredba (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju uradnega nadzora, da se zagotovi preverjanje skladnosti z zakonodajo o krmi in živilih ter s pravili o zdravstvenem varstvu živali in zaščiti živali (UL L 165, 30.4.2004, str.
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report entitled ‘Can the Commission and the Member States show that the EU budget allocated to the rural development policy is well spent?’, and endorses in principle its recommendations;
1).
Points out that there is a need for a greener, fairer and fully legitimate common agriculture policy, which represents the principle of ‘public spending for public goods’, and which would thus represent a significant step forward in the evolution and modernisation of the CAP; recalls that Union agriculture policy has to deliver benefits for the public in general and not only for farmers;
UL L 286, 17.10.2012, str.
Points out that the rural development programmes are important instruments to create jobs and promote growth, to make agriculture more competitive and to improve the environment; as spending on rural development covers measures supporting farms, agricultural holdings and small businesses and communities in rural areas; considers it necessary that these measures should address the needs of this variety of recipients and thus achieve a variety of objectives; points out that monitoring and evaluation are key to this and considers it important that Parliament and the public know if Union money is spent well;
376.
Invites the Member States to set specific measurable objectives within their RDPs, focusing on what the rural development expenditure is intended to achieve; believes that the Commission should ensure — prior to their approval- that the Member States’ RDPs contain clear objectives and evaluation plans that will provide information on the results achieved by the planned actions according to the agreed objectives and in time to inform policy decisions for the next programming period;
UL L 286, 17.10.2012, str.
Is concerned about the fact that the Court of Auditors has found that the current monitoring and evaluation arrangements have failed to provide the information to show that measures are targeted towards achieving policy objectives in the most efficient way; asks that Parliament be clearly informed on the achieved results of the spending on rural development;
387.
Regarding the large amount of almost EUR 100 billion allocated to achieving rural development objectives in the 2007-2013 financial period, as well as EUR 58 billion of Member States’ own resources, agrees with the Court of Auditors that improvements to monitoring and evaluation should be made for the remainder of the current spending period (end of 2015) to ensure that the Union budget is spent well;
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2013)0187.
Calls on the Member States to make immediate use of monitoring and evaluation to increase their focus on results and recommends that the Commission and Member States improve the evaluation of the results of RDPs in the current funding period and use the findings to improve the RDPs for the 2014-2020 funding period;
COM(2013) 246 z dne 22. aprila 2013.
Calls on the Commission to improve the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) for 2014-2020 so as to obtain an efficient tool for the Member States and the Commission which generates relevant data to be used for monitoring and evaluation; insists on the need to develop reliable indicators to allow comparisons between Member States (and/or regions) and to monitor the results of the various rural development measures and their contribution in achieving the Union’s priorities;
UL C 99 E, 3.4.2012, str.
Considers that Member States need to have a common system of monitoring and evaluation to ensure that the Commission will be able to analyse the extent of progress and achievement of the defined objectives and its impact, and effectiveness at Union level; welcomes the work currently being undertaken by the Commission and Member States to define compulsory common indicators for the 2014 - 2020 monitoring and evaluation framework for the CAP and RDPs; calls on them to ensure that RDPs are drawn up with clear requirements for use of those indicators;
64.
Considers that the application of a specific objective must have a certain degree of homogeneity in different territories, and therefore it is necessary to avoid dispersion in the areas of regulation, application and budget, and to give this measure uniformity in its implementation by Member States;
UL C 169 E, 15.6.2012, str.
Calls on the Commission to ensure that Parliament receives the Annual Implementation Reports foreseen for 2017 and 2019 in a timely manner, so that it is also able to assess the results indicators and impact of the RDPs;
66.
Part XXVI
UL L 315, 14.11.2012, str.
Special Report No 14/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘European Union direct financial support to the Palestinian Authority’
1.
Welcomes the Special Report examining direct Union financial support to the Palestinian Authority as an important contribution to the overall political and financial debate about the Union’s engagement with the Palestinian Authority with a view to supporting progress towards the two-state solution in full compliance with the principle of respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of both the territory administered by the Palestinian Authority and the state of Israel; takes note of the findings, conclusions and recommendations and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
COM(2011) 751 z dne 15. novembra 2011.
Welcomes the findings of the report which confirm some important achievements and the need for improvements of the current PEGASE mechanism (Palestinian-European Mechanism for Management of Socio-Economic Aid), in particular stating that:
COM(2011) 752 z dne 15. novembra 2011.
the Commission established specific verification procedures which are well designed to ensure that funds are only paid to beneficiaries that meet specific eligibility criteria;
COM(2011) 752, člen 50(6).
the eligibility verification checks are robust and further simplification needs have been addressed by the Commission;
Pismo predsednika Računskega sodišča Victorja Caldere z dne 10. decembra 2010 – CPT11656EN01-10PP-OR.doc
the direct financial support contributed to some important improvements in the Palestinian Authority’s public finance management;
UL L 311, 14.11.2002, str.
a new Union technical assistance project to restructure the electricity sector in the West Bank and Gaza is well designed to bring more sustainable results in the medium term;
3.
the PEGASE direct financial support (DFS) reached the eligible beneficiaries, and the funding played an important part in supporting vulnerable families and also contributed to the reform process of the system of social assistance;
Evropsko računsko sodišče, sporočilo za medije ECA/13/05.
the PEGASE DFS made a significant input to the delivery of essential public services like education and health care;
Komisija meni, da je angleški prevod „permanent“ za italijanski izraz „durevole“ nepravilen, ampak bi se moral glasiti „lasting“.
Expresses serious concerns that a number of shortcomings in the Commission’s management of the PEGASE mechanism remain, inter alia:
COM(2013) 623 z dne 10. septembra 2013.
the Commission does not apply its standard internal quality review procedures to the annual PEGASE DFS programme, which prevents it from fully assessing its effectiveness and efficiency in comparison to other Union aid programmes;
UL C 168 E, 14.6.2013, str.
no performance indicators were included in the financing agreements making it more difficult to assess the concrete results of the support, especially as regards the percentage of the programme’s funds spent on administrative costs compared to the percentage of funds disbursed to the eligible beneficiaries;
72.
the Commission has not prepared a risk assessment addressing issues such as corruption in Gaza with regard to the payroll system, which also raises concerns about the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing;
Uredba (EU) št. 1315/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2013 o smernicah Unije za razvoj vseevropskega prometnega omrežja in razveljavitvi Sklepa št. 661/2010/EU (UL L 348, 20.12.2013, str.
significant weaknesses persist in the Palestinian Authority’s public finance management, such as inadequate legislative scrutiny of the budget and the external audit reports, or the lack of proper government procurement and commitment controls;
1).
Urges the Commission and the EEAS to address these issues without delay and to act together with the Palestinian Authority and inform Parliament and the Council about the progress made in due time;
UL L 406, 30.12.2006, str.
Welcomes the fact that the Commission addressed the Court of Auditors’ concern with regard to use of direct negotiated procedures and the application of more competitive tendering procedures; shares the Court of Auditors’ view that competitive tendering would be more beneficial for contracts for management services and audit; encourages the Commission to make the application of competitive tendering procedures mandatory with a view to seeking the best value for money and ensuring a level playing field between all market participants, allowing for derogations in crisis situations;
1.
Is concerned about the continuing decline in donor funding for the Palestinian Authority from both Member States and third countries; notes with concern, furthermore, the Court of Auditors’ finding that the Commission and the EEAS have not developed a clear strategy on how to reduce the Palestinian Authority’s dependency on Union financial support; takes note of the political constraints which make it very difficult to effectively reduce the Palestinians’ dependency on external aid; encourages the Commission and the EEAS to continue the efforts to increase the Palestinian Authority’s financial independence from outside sources;
UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str.
Urges the Commission and the EEAS to fully take into account the Court of Auditors’ findings with regard to the absence of conditionality of the Union direct financial support to the Palestinian Authority which weakens the Commission’s and EEAS’s potential leverage towards more reforms; notes that the absence of conditionality is a political choice by the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States in line with their political objectives in the Middle East Peace Process, but considers that this may need to be reviewed in view of increasing the effectiveness of Union aid implementation in the region;
855.
Calls, therefore, on the Commission and the EEAS to see if the ‘more for more’ principle regarding the implementation of the PEGASE mechanism can be applied and to closely monitor its disbursement; expects to be informed on possible progress made;
Uredba (EU) št. 1307/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. december 2013 o pravilih za neposredna plačila kmetom na podlagi shem podpore v okviru skupne kmetijske politike ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 637/2008 in Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str.
Is worried about the Court of Auditors’ findings with regard to little progress made by the Palestinian Authority to reform the civil service and pension systems with a view to reducing the fiscal impact of the increasing numbers of staff and pensioners; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to engage with the Palestinian Authority without delay to address these structural issues, and to report regularly to Parliament and the Council on the state of play;
608).
Regrets, in accordance with the findings of the Court of Auditors, that the Commission and the EEAS have not paid sufficient attention to the fungibility of the PEGASE funding; expresses concern about the risks also mentioned by the Court of Auditors that PEGASE DFS might be used by the Palestinian Authority as a substitution for its own budget to support the CSP component (support for civil servants and pensioners) of its policies, including possible funding to police and security personnel which are not eligible for PEGASE DFS; requests that the Commission ensures that funding is only made available based on end beneficiaries from the agreed list of persons;
Boljše usposabljanje za varnejšo hrano
Requests the forensic auditing of the PEGASE DFS disbursement by the end of 2014 to ensure that none of its funding is disbursed or channelled illegally to ineligible groups, and insists on the Commission and the EEAS to seek the full cooperation of the Palestinian Authority to prevent any possible diversion of the PEGASE funding in 2014; calls on the Court of Auditors to provide assistance in the use of the proper methodology for the audit;
Art.
the lack of transparency concerning the amounts of fees deducted by Israel for goods and services it charges to the Palestinian Authority;
Izobraževanja
Israel’s continuing control of the West Bank’s ‘Area C’ which represents a major obstacle for a long-term and sustainable development of the Palestinian Authority;
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012, oddelek X – Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje
restrictions imposed by the government of Israel on Palestinian companies as described in the Court of Auditors’ audit report;
ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012 [1],ob upoštevanju konsolidiranega letnega zaključnega računa Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012 (COM(2013) 570 – C7-0282/2013) [2],ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2012 z odgovori revidiranih institucij [3],ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti [4] računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij, ki jo je za proračunsko leto 2012 v skladu s členom 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pripravilo Računsko sodišče,ob upoštevanju člena 314(10) ter členov 317, 318 in 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,