natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The reference to a Community standard in the context of the EEA Agreement is explicitly provided for by the Environmental Guidelines, see section A(5) thereof.
Sklicevanje na standard Skupnosti v okviru Sporazuma EGP je izrecno predpisano z Okoljskimi smernicami, glej oddelek A(5) Smernic.
Section II 3.1.2 of Authority's Decision to open the formal investigation procedure, Decision 122/05/COL.
Oddelek II 3.1.2 odločbe Nadzornega organa o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave, Odločba 122/05/COL.
Section II 3.1.3 of the Authority's decision to open the formal investigation procedure, Decision 122/05/COL.
Oddelek II 3.1.3 odločbe Nadzornega organa o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave, Odločba 122/05/COL.
Exchange rate as published on the Authority's webpage, set at 7.23 for 2003.
Devizni tečaj, objavljen na spletni strani Nadzornega organa, je za leto 2003 znašal 7,23.
Letter from First Securities to Enova dated 16 December 2004.
Dopis First Securities organu Enova z dne 16. decembra 2004.
See above section I.6 of this Decision.
Glej zgornji oddelek I.6 te odločbe.
A green certificate is normally understood to be a minimum price fixed by the State which a producer of ‘green energy’ obtains from the distributor.
Zeleni certifikat se običajno razume kot najnižja cena, ki jo določi država in ki jo distributer plača proizvajalcu „zelene energije“.
Such green certificates, may, depending on the individual case, not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.
Lahko se zgodi, da takšni zeleni certifikati v posameznem primeru ne pomenijo državne pomoči v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP.
The Norwegian authorities gave up on a joint green certificate market with Sweden in February 2006.
Norveški organi so se skupnemu zelenemu certifikatu s Švedsko odpovedali februarja 2006.
Cases C-261/01 and C-262/0, Belgische Staat v Calster, Cleeren, Openbaar Slachthuis NV, [2003] ECR I-12249, paragraph 46, Case C-47/69 France v Commission [1970] ECR 487, paragraph 4.
Zadevi C-261/01 in C-262/0, Belgische Staat proti Calster, Cleeren, Openbaar Slachthuis NV, [2003] Recueil, I-12249, odstavek 46, Zadeva C-47/69 Francija proti Komisiji [1970] Recueil, 487, odstavek 4.
Case C-72/92 Firma Herbert Scharbatke GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany [1993] ECR I-5509, referring to Article 95, now 90 of the EC Treaty.
Zadeva C-72/92 Firma Herbert Scharbatke GmbH proti Zvezni republiki Nemčiji [1993] Recueil, I-5509, z napotilom na člen 95, zdaj 90 Pogodbe ES.
Article 14 of the EEA Agreement is identical to Article 90 of the EC Treaty.
Člen 14 Sporazuma EGP je enak členu 90 Pogodbe ES.
Case C-266/91 Celulose Beira Industrial SA v Fazenda Pública [1993] ECR I-4337.
Zadeva C-266/91 Celulose Beira Industrial SA proti Fazenda Pública [1993] Recueil, I-4337.
Cases C-78/90 to C-83/90 Compagnie Commerciale de l'Ouest and Others [1992] ECR I-1847.
Zadeve C-78/90 do C-83/90 Compagnie Commerciale de l’Ouest in drugi [1992] Recueil, I-1847.
Case C-350/93 Commission v Italy [1995] ECR I-699, paragraph 22.
Zadeva C-350/93 Komisija proti Italiji [1995] Recueil, I-699, odstavek 22.
Case C-75/97 Belgium v Commission [1999] ECR I-3671, paragraph 66, and Case C-310/99 Italy v Commission [2002] ECR I-2289, paragraph 99.
Zadeva C-75/97 Belgija proti Komisiji [1999] Recueil, I-3671, odstavek 66, in Zadeva C-310/99 Italija proti Komisiji [2002] Recueil, I-2289, odstavek 99.
Case C-169/95 Spain v Commission [1997] ECR I-135, paragraph 51.
Zadeva C-169/95 Španija proti Komisiji [1997] Recueil, I-135, odstavek 51.
Preparation and design costs, (B) costs of buildings, machinery and equipment, installation costs or costs incurred for the adjustment and repair work of existing buildings, machinery and equipment (C) Up to the limit of 10 % of the projects' eligible expenditure, costs arising from the purchase of land directly related to the investment and from the construction of electric lines. (D) Costs ensuing from the construction of a pipe to be connected to a district heating network.
Stroški priprave in zasnove; B) stroški zgradb, strojev in opreme, stroški namestitve ali stroški, ki nastanejo zaradi prilagoditvenih ali popravljalnih del na obstoječih zgradbah, strojih in opremi; C) do zgornje meje 10 % upravičenih izdatkov projekta, stroški, ki izhajajo iz nakupa zemljišča, neposredno povezani z naložbo, in iz izgradnje električnih vodov; D) stroški izgradnje cevovoda, ki se priključi na omrežje daljinskega ogrevanja.
Support given for energy audits, which are not linked to energy saving investment and e.g. concern behavioural or system changes, can only be supported according to the conditions stipulated in section D.2.
Podpora, dodeljena za energetske preglede, ki niso povezani z naložbami v varčevanje z energijo, in npr. zadevajo spremembe ravnanja ali sistema, se lahko dodeli samo v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v oddelku D.2.
of the Environmental Guidelines in conjunction with the Act referred to under point 1(e) of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement.
Okoljskih smernic v povezavi z aktom, navedenim v točki 1(e) Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP.
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [2], in particular to Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [2] ter zlasti členov 61 do 63 in Protokola 26 k Sporazumu,
See above fn.
Glej op.
Lov av 29 Juni 1990 nr. 50 om produksjon, omforming, overføring, omsetning og fordeling av energi m.m, energiloven.
Lov av 29 Juni 1990 nr. 50 om produksjon, omforming, overføring, omsetning og fordeling av energi m. m, energiloven.
Admittedly, analyses were made to establish when the project would break even. Still, there were no explicit limitations which prevented State support above that point.
Sicer so bile izvedene analize za ugotovitev, kdaj naj bi projekt dosegel prag dobička, vendar ni bilo izrecnih omejitev, ki bi preprečevale državno podporo nad tem pragom.
The aid recipient's overhead costs, interests paid during construction, adherence fees and deductible taxes will not be eligible.
Splošni stroški prejemnika pomoči, obresti, plačane med izgradnjo, članarine in odbitni davki ne bodo upravičeni.
26 of this Decision.
26 te odločbe.
See the example on page 7 of the Authority's decision to open the formal investigation procedure (Decision 122/05/COL) as well as page 9 thereof, in particular fn.
Glej primer na strani 7 odločbe Nadzornega organa o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave (Odločba 122/05/COL) in na strani 9 Odločbe, zlasti op.
See above, fn.
Glej zgoraj, op.
State aid N 75/2002 — Finland, see above fn.
Državna pomoč N 75/2002 – Finska, glej zgornjo op.
30 of this Decision.
30 te odločbe.
29 of this Decision.
29 te odločbe.
The European Commission authorised a similar structure in Commission Decision N 707/2002, above fn.
Evropska komisija je podobno strukturo odobrila v Odločbi Komisije N 707/2002, zgornja op.
Figures from NVE report: Costs of the production of energy and heat in 2002 Wind
Podatki iz poročila NVE: Stroški proizvodnje električne in toplotne energije v letu 2002
Eligible costs are the costs described in section I. 9.1, fn.
Upravičeni stroški so opisani v oddelku I.9.1, op.
35 of this Decision.
35 te odločbe.
Odelstingets vedtak til lov om endringar i lov 29. juni 1990 nr. 50 om produksjon, omforming, overføring, omsetning og fordeling av energi m.m. (energilova).
Odelstingets vedtak til lov om endringar i lov 29. juni 1990 nr. 50 om produksjon, omforming, overføring, omsetning og fordeling av energi m. m. (energilova).
See section I 9.1. number 5 and fn.
Glej številko (5) oddelka I 9.1. in op.
See fn.
Glej op.
Such costs were also accepted by the European Commission in State aid N 75/2002 — Finland, see above fn.
S takšnimi stroški se je strinjala tudi Evropska komisija v Državni pomoči N 75/2002 – Finska, glej zgornjo op.
See the comments in Commission Decision N 707/2002, above fn.
Glej pripombe v Odločbi Komisije N 707/2002, zgornja op.
42 and N 533/01 — Ireland, aid to promote renewable energy sources in Ireland.
42, in N 533/01 – Irska, pomoč za spodbujanje obnovljivih virov energije na Irskem.
No 143/06/COL
št. 143/06/COL
concerning a monitoring programme for 2006 to ensure compliance with maximum levels of pesticide residues in and on cereals and certain other products of plant origin and national monitoring programmes for 2007
o usklajenem programu spremljanja za leto 2006 za zagotovitev skladnosti z najvišjimi dovoljenimi vrednostmi ostankov pesticidov v in na žitih ter v in na nekaterih drugih proizvodih rastlinskega izvora ter o nacionalnih programih spremljanja za leto 2007
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA), and in particular Article 109 and Protocol 1 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (EGP) in zlasti člena 109 in Protokola 1 Sporazuma,
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 38 of Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 86/362/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on cereals), as last amended and adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, and in particular Article 7(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 38 poglavja XII Priloge II k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 86/362/EGS z dne 24. julija 1986 o določanju mejnih vrednosti ostankov pesticidov v in na žitih, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen in prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu, in zlasti njenega člena 7(2)(b),
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 54 in Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 90/642/EEC of 27 November 1990 on the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on certain products of plant origin, including fruit and vegetables), as last amended and adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, and in particular Article 4(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 54 poglavja XII Priloge II k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 90/642/ES z dne 27. novembra 1990 o določitvi najvišjih dovoljenih vrednosti ostankov pesticidov v in na nekaterih proizvodih kmetijskega izvora, vključno s sadjem in zelenjavo, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen in prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu, in zlasti njenega člena 4(2)(b),
The EFTA Surveillance Authority should progressively work towards a system which would permit the estimation of dietary exposure to actual pesticides.
Nadzorni organ EFTA bi moral postopoma vzpostaviti sistem, ki bo omogočal oceno izpostavljenosti dejanskim pesticidom v prehrani.
To make realistic estimations possible, data on the monitoring of pesticide residues should be available in a number of food products which constitute major components of the European diet.
Da bi bile mogoče realne ocene, morajo biti na razpolago podatki o spremljanju ostankov pesticidov v številnih živilskih proizvodih, ki so glavne sestavine evropske prehrane.
It is generally recognised that major components of the European diet are constituted by some 20 to 30 food products.
Splošno priznano je, da približno 20 do 30 živilskih proizvodov pomeni glavne sestavine evropske prehrane.
In view of the resources available at national level for pesticide residue monitoring, the EFTA States are only able to analyse samples of eight products each year within a co-ordinated monitoring programme.
Z vidika virov, ki so na razpolago na nacionalni ravni za spremljanje ostankov pesticidov, lahko države Efte v okviru usklajenega programa spremljanja vsako leto analizirajo vzorce samo osmih proizvodov.
Pesticide uses show changes within the timescale of the three-year cycles.
Pri uporabi pesticidov se kažejo spremembe v časovnem obdobju treh let.
Residues of all the pesticides covered by this Recommendation should be monitored in 2006, as this will allow using these data for the estimation of actual dietary exposure to them.
V letu 2006 je treba spremljati ostanke vseh pesticidov, ki jih zajema to priporočilo, ker bo tako omogočena uporaba teh podatkov za oceno dejanske izpostavljenosti navedenim pesticidom v prehrani.
A systematic statistical approach to numbers of samples to be taken in each monitoring exercise is necessary.
Potreben je sistematičen statistični pristop glede števila vzorcev, ki jih je treba odvzeti pri vsakem usklajenem programu spremljanja.
Such an approach has been set out by the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
Takšen pristop je bil določen v pravilniku Komisije Codex Alimentarius.
On the basis of a binomial probability distribution, it can be calculated that examination of 613 samples gives a confidence of more than 99 % for detecting one sample containing pesticide residues above the limit of determination (LOD), provided that less than 1 % of products of plant origin contain residues above that limit.
Na podlagi binomske verjetnostne porazdelitve se da izračunati, da pregled 613 vzorcev pomeni več kakor 99 % gotovost, da se zazna vzorec, ki vsebuje ostanke pesticida nad mejo določitve (LOD), če manj kot 1 % proizvodov rastlinskega izvora vsebuje ostanke nad navedeno mejo.
Collection of these samples should be apportioned across the European Economic Area on the basis of population and consumer numbers, with a minimum of 12 samples per product and per year.
Zbiranje teh vzorcev bi bilo treba porazdeliti po vsem Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru na podlagi števila prebivalcev in porabnikov, z najmanj 12 vzorci na proizvod na leto.
Guidelines concerning ‘Quality Control Procedures for Pesticide Residue Analysis’ are published on the European Commission website.
Smernice glede „postopkov nadzora kakovosti za analizo ostankov pesticidov“ so objavljene na spletni strani Komisije.
It is agreed that these guidelines should be applied as far as possible by the analytical laboratories of the EFTA States and should be reviewed continuously in the light of experience gained in the monitoring programmes.
Dogovorjeno je, da bi morali analitski laboratoriji držav Efte te smernice uporabljati, kolikor je le mogoče, in jih stalno revidirati glede na izkušnje, pridobljene pri programih spremljanja.
The sampling methods and procedures laid down in the Act referred to at point 54zz of Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement (Commission Directive 2002/63/EC of 11 July 2002 establishing Community methods of sampling for the official control of pesticide residues in and on products of plant and animal origin and repealing Directive 79/700/EEC incorporate those recommended by the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
Metode vzorčenja in postopki, določeni v aktu iz točke 54zz poglavja XII Priloge II k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Komisije 2002/63/ES z dne 11. julija 2002 o določitvi metod vzorčenja za uraden nadzor nad ostanki pesticidov v in na proizvodih rastlinskega in živalskega izvora v Skupnosti in o razveljavitvi Direktive 79/700/EGS), vsebujejo tiste, ki so priporočena v pravilniku Codex Alimentarius Commission.
Article 4(2)(a) of Directive 90/642/EEC and Article 7(2)(a) of Directive 86/362/EEC require the EFTA States to specify the criteria applied in drawing up their national inspection programmes.
Člen 4(2)(a) Direktive 90/642/EGS in člen 7(2)(a) Direktive 86/362/EGS določata, da države Efte opredelijo merila za sestavljanje svojih nacionalnih inšpekcijskih programov.
Maximum residue levels for baby food have been established in accordance with Article 6 of the Act referred to at point 54a in Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement (Commission Directive 91/321/EEC of 14 May 1991 on infant formulae and follow-on formulae, as amended, and Article 6 of the Act referred to at point 54zl in Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement (Commission Directive 96/5/EC, of 16 February 1996 on processed cereal-based foods and baby foods for infants and young children, as amended.
Najvišje dovoljene vrednosti ostankov za otroško hrano so bile določene v skladu s členom 6 akta iz točke 54a poglavja XII Priloge II k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Komisije 91/321/EGS z dne 14. maja 1991 o začetnih in nadaljevalnih formulah za dojenčke in majhne otroke) in členom 6 akta iz točke 54zl poglavja XII Priloge II k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Komisije 96/5/ES z dne 16. februarja 1996 o žitnih kašicah ter živilih za dojenčke in majhne otroke), kakor je bil spremenjen.
Information on the results of monitoring programmes is particularly appropriate for treatment, storage and transmission by electronic methods.
Podatki o rezultatih programov spremljanja so zlasti primerni za obdelavo, shranjevanje in prenos z elektronskimi metodami.
Formats have been developed for supply of data by e-mail from the EC Member States to the Commission.
Izdelani so bili obrazci za zagotavljanje podatkov Komisiji iz držav članic ES po elektronski pošti.
The EFTA States could use the same format and should therefore be able to send their reports to the EFTA Surveillance Authority in the standard format.
Zato bi države Efte lahko uporabljale enak obrazec in bi zato lahko pošiljale svoja poročila Nadzornemu organu EFTA na standardnem obrazcu.
The further development of such a standard format is most effectively undertaken by the development of guidelines.
Izpopolnitev takšnega standardnega obrazca je najučinkovitejša, kadar so izdelane smernice.
The measures provided for in this recommendation are in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Foodstuffs Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem priporočilom, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora EFTA za rastline in živalsko krmo, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu EFTA –
HEREBY RECOMMENDS THE EFTA STATES TO:
PRIPOROČA DRŽAVAM EFTE, DA:
Sample and analyse for the product/pesticide residue combinations set out in the Annex I to this Recommendation, on the basis of the number of samples reflecting as appropriate, national, EEA and third country share of the EFTA State's market.
jemljejo in analizirajo vzorce za kombinacije proizvod/ostanek pesticida, določene v Prilogi I k temu priporočilu, na podlagi števila vzorcev, ki pomeni ustrezni delež države članice, EGP in tretje države na trgu države Efte.
The sampling procedure, including the number of units, should be in line with the Act referred to at point 54zz of Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2002/63/EC.
Metode vzorčenja, vključno s številom enot, morajo biti v skladu z aktom iz točke 54zz poglavja XII Priloge II k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Komisije 2002/63/ES z dne 11. julija 2002 o določitvi metod vzorčenja za uraden nadzor nad ostanki pesticidov v in na proizvodih rastlinskega in živalskega izvora v Skupnosti in o razveljavitvi Direktive 79/700/EGS);
For pesticides posing an acute risk i.e. where an ARfD is set (e.g. OP-esters, endosulfan and N-methylcarbamates) sampling should be done in such a way to allow the selection of two laboratory samples.
za pesticide, ki pomenijo akutno tveganje, tj. takrat, kadar je določen ARfD (npr. OP-estri, endosulfan in N-metilkarbamati), opravijo vzorčenje tako, da dovoljuje izbiro dveh laboratorijskih vzorcev.
If the first laboratory sample contains a detectable residue of a targeted pesticide, the units of the second sample should be analysed individually.
Če prvi laboratorijski vzorec vsebuje zaznaven ostanek ciljnega pesticida, je treba enote drugega vzorca posamično analizirati.
This applies to the following products:
To velja za proizvode:
Pepper.
paprike.
Of these products, a reasonable number of samples should also be subjected to individual analysis of the individual units within the second laboratory sample in case such pesticides are detected in the first sample and particularly if it is the produce of a single producer.
Ustrezno število vzorcev teh proizvodov mora biti dano v posebno analizo posameznih enot za drugi laboratorijski vzorec, kadar se takšni pesticidi odkrijejo v prvem vzorcu in zlasti, če gre za proizvod enega samega proizvajalca;
Of the total amount of samples as given according to Annex I, each EFTA State, take and analyse:
iz celotnega števila vzorcev, kakor določa Priloga I, vsaka država Efte vzame in analizira:
at least ten samples of baby food based mainly on vegetables, fruits or cereals;
vsaj deset vzorcev otroške hrane, pripravljene pretežno iz zelenjave, sadja ali žit;
a number of samples (with a minimum of one sample where available) from produce originating from organic farming that reflects the market share of organic produce in each EFTA State.
več vzorcev (najmanj en vzorec, kadar je na voljo) iz ekološko pridelanih kmetijskih proizvodov, ki odraža tržni delež ekološko pridelanih kmetijskih proizvodov v vsaki državi Efte;
Report the results of the analysis of samples tested for the product/pesticide residue combinations set out in the Annex I to this Recommendation, by 31 August 2007 at the latest, indicating:
najpozneje do 31. avgusta 2007 poročajo o rezultatih analiz vzorcev, testiranih za kombinacije proizvod/ostanek pesticida, določenih v Prilogi I k temu priporočilu, z navedbo:
the analytical methods used and reporting levels achieved, in accordance with the quality control procedures set out in the Quality Control Procedures for pesticide residue analysis;
uporabljenih analiznih metod in doseženih načinov poročanja, v skladu s postopki nadzora kakovosti, določenimi v postopkih nadzora kakovosti za analizo ostankov pesticidov;
the number and type of infringements and the action taken.
števila in vrste kršitve ter ukrepa, ki je bil uveden;
The report should be produced in a format, including the electronic format, conforming to the guidance to the EEA States with regard to implementation of recommendations concerning monitoring programmes.
poročilo pripravijo na obrazcu, vključno z elektronskim obrazcem, ki ustreza smernicam državam Efte v zvezi z izvajanjem priporočil glede programov spremljanja.
The result on samples taken from produce originating from organic farming should be reported in a separate datasheet.
Rezultate vzorcev, odvzetih iz ekološko pridelanih kmetijskih proizvodov, je treba navesti na posebnem obrazcu;
Send to the EFTA Surveillance Authority and to the other EFTA States, by 31 August 2006 at the latest, all the information as required by Article 7(3) of Directive 86/362/EEC and Article 4(3) of Directive 90/642/EEC concerning the 2005 monitoring exercise to ensure, at least by check sampling, compliance with maximum pesticide residue levels including:
najpozneje do 31. avgusta 2006 pošljejo Nadzornemu organu EFTA in drugim državam Efte informacije, zahtevane v členu 7(3) Direktive 86/362/EGS in členu 4(3) Direktive 90/642/EGS v zvezi s programom spremljanja za leto 2005, da se vsaj z naključnim vzorčenjem zagotovi skladnost z najvišjimi dovoljenimi vrednostmi ostankov pesticidov, vključno z:
information on their laboratories’ quality control procedures and, in particular, information concerning aspects of the guidelines concerning quality control procedures for pesticide residue analysis which they have not been able to apply or have had difficulty in applying;
podatki o njihovih laboratorijskih postopkih nadzora kakovosti in zlasti podatki o vidikih smernic glede postopkov nadzora kakovosti za analizo ostankov pesticidov, ki jih niso mogle uporabiti ali so imele težave pri njihovi uporabi;
information on accreditation in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of Directive 93/99/EEC (including type of accreditation, accreditation body and copy of accreditation certificate) of the laboratories carrying out the analyses;
podatki o akreditaciji v skladu s členom 3 Direktive 93/99/EGS (vključno z vrsto akreditacije, akreditacijskim organom in izvodom potrdila o akreditaciji) laboratorijev, ki izvajajo analize;
information about the proficiency tests and ring tests in which the laboratory has participated.
podatki o preizkusih strokovne usposobljenosti in testih primerljivosti, ki se jih je laboratorij udeležil;
Send to the EFTA Surveillance Authority, by 30 September 2006 at the latest, their intended national programme for monitoring maximum pesticide residue levels fixed by Directives 90/642/EEC and 86/362/EEC for the year 2007, including information on:
najpozneje do 30. septembra 2006 pošljejo Nadzornemu organu EFTA svoje nacionalne programe spremljanja najvišjih dovoljenih vrednosti ostankov pesticidov, določenih z Direktivama 90/642/EGS in 86/362/EGS za leto 2007, vključno z informacijami o: