natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Welcomes the fact that the Agencies set out, in a table annexed to the Court of Auditors’ 2010 specific annual reports, a comparison of the operations that were carried out during 2009 and 2010, enabling the discharge authority to assess more effectively their performance from one year to the next; notes that this has been required by the discharge authority since the 2008 Agencies’ discharge procedure;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so agencije v tabeli, priloženi posebnim letnim poročilom Računskega sodišča, prikazale primerjavo dejavnosti, ki so jih izvajale v letih 2009 in 2010, da bo lahko organ za podelitev razrešnice učinkoviteje ovrednotil njihovo uspešnost od enega do drugega leta; ugotavlja, da organ za podelitev razrešnice to zahteva od postopka za podelitev razrešnice agencijam v letu 2008;
Role of coordinator of the network of Agencies
Vloga koordinatorja mreže agencij
Commends the ECHA on its effective work as coordinator of the network of Agencies during the 2010 discharge procedure; considers this be a practice that should also be followed by the growing Joint Undertakings;
izraža pohvalo agenciji ECHA, ker je v postopku za podelitev razrešnice za leto 2010 učinkovito opravljala delo koordinatorja mreže agencij; meni, da bi morala temu zgledu slediti tudi vse številnejša skupna podjetja;
COMMON CHALLENGES ON TRANSPARENCY
SKUPNI IZZIVI GLEDE PREGLEDNOSTI
Agencies’ website
Spletna mesta agencij
Urges the Agencies to provide, via their websites, information necessary to ensure transparency, especially financial transparency; urges in particular the Agencies to make available on their website the list of all contracts awarded over the last three years and the list of the Members of their Management Boards with their Declaration of Interests and a list of all enterprises which are involved in PPP contracts or which are in other commercial connections with Agencies; calls on the Commission to continue its efforts to make this information fully accessible and integrate it into its financial transparency system;
poziva agencije, naj na svojih spletnih mestih objavljajo informacije, ki so potrebne za zagotavljanje preglednosti, zlasti v zvezi s financami; zlasti jih poziva, naj na svojih spletnih mestih objavijo seznam vseh javnih del, dodeljenih v preteklih treh letih, in seznam članov svojega upravnega odbora z izjavami o interesih, pa tudi seznam vseh podjetij, s katerimi so sklenjene pogodbe o javno-zasebnem partnerstvu ali so kako drugače komercialno povezana z agencijami; poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za večjo dostopnost teh informacij in jih vključi v svoj sistem finančne preglednosti;
Relations with stakeholders
Odnosi z interesnimi skupinami
Calls on the Agencies to ensure that they exercise their functions in coordination with the different stakeholders;
poziva agencije, naj opravljanje svojih nalog uskladijo z različnimi interesnimi skupinami;
Urges the Agencies to strengthen the involvement of the European institutions, in particular Parliament, in their annual planning;
poziva agencije, naj evropske institucije, zlasti Parlament, bolje vključijo v svoje letno načrtovanje;
Calls on the Agencies to adopt effective processes that duly address allegations of conflict of interests within the Agencies and/or the Management Board, in particular in EASA, EEA and EFSA;
poziva agencije, naj sprejmejo učinkovite postopke, s katerimi bi dosledno obravnavale obtožbe o navzkrižjih interesov v agencijah in/ali upravnih odborih, zlasti v EASA, EEA in EFSA;
Welcomes the initiative of some Agencies, as for instance the Community Fisheries Control Agency whose Internal Audit Capability developed an internal training course and has provided the necessary training related to Ethics and Integrity at the Agency; it particularly welcomes that the training is obligatory to all staff to ensure awareness of ethical and organisational values, in particular ethical conduct, avoidance of conflicts of interest, fraud prevention and reporting of irregularities;
pozdravlja pobudo nekaterih agencij, na primer Evropske agencije za nadzor ribištva, katere oddelek za notranjo revizijo je pripravil interni izobraževalni tečaj in zagotovil potrebno usposabljanje o etiki in integriteti v agenciji; še zlasti pozdravlja dejstvo, da je usposabljanje obvezno za vse uslužbence, da se seznanijo z etičnimi in organizacijskimi vrednotami, zlasti etičnim ravnanjem, preprečevanjem navzkrižja interesov in goljufij ter poročanjem o nepravilnostih;
Calls on the Agencies to carefully file and assess their control systems in order to prevent conflict of interests between their staff and experts working in their Agency; calls, in addition, on the Management Board of the Agencies to adopt and apply the strictest rules and verification mechanisms towards their Members to ensure their full independence from private interests; recalls once more that an Agency’s reputation will be damaged in cases where it is challenged on the ground of conflict of interests, with negative impact to the Union’s reputation;
agencije poziva, naj pozorno uredijo in ocenijo svoje kontrolne sisteme, da bi preprečile navzkrižje interesov med svojimi uslužbenci in strokovnjaki, ki delajo pri njih; poleg tega upravne odbore agencij poziva, naj za svoje člane sprejmejo in uporabljajo najstrožja merila in mehanizme preverjanja, da zagotovijo njihovo popolno neodvisnost od zasebnih interesov; ponovno opozarja, da izpostavljenost agencije kritiki zaradi navzkrižja interesov lahko škoduje njenemu ugledu in slabo vpliva na ugled Unije;
Recalls that the European Ombudsman criticised EFSA for the way it assesses potential conflicts of interest and ‘revolving door’ cases; calls on other Agencies to employ efficient procedures to detect and prevent any conflict of interest situations; takes the view that the ‘cooling-off’ period of anyone who has served as director of an agency or has discharged major responsibilities within an agency needs to be clarified;
ponovno opozarja, da je evropski varuh za človekove pravice grajal agencijo EFSA za njen način ocenjevanja morebitnega navzkrižja interesov in primerov „vrtljivih vrat“; poziva druge agencije, naj z uporabo učinkovitih postopkov odkrijejo in preprečijo morebitne primere navzkrižja interesov; meni, da je treba jasno opredeliti prehodno obdobje za vse, ki so bili na položaju direktorja agencije ali so izvajali zelo odgovorne naloge v agenciji;
Invites the Agencies, therefore, to provide their responsible committees and the Budgetary Control Committee in Parliament with a detailed overview of the procedures, criteria and verification mechanisms applied to avoid ‘revolving door’ cases and any situations of conflicts of interest; where this role is ensured together with the national counterparts, urges the Agencies to clarify this sharing role to avoid responsibility-related loopholes in cases of conflicts of interest;
zato agencije poziva, naj pristojnemu odboru in Odboru za proračunski nadzor v Parlamentu zagotovijo podroben pregled nad postopki, merili in mehanizmi preverjanja, ki jih uporabljajo, da bi preprečile primere „vrtljivih vrat“ in morebitna navzkrižja interesov; agencije, ki to nalogo opravljajo skupaj z nacionalnimi stranmi, poziva, naj pojasnijo to delitev vloge, da v primeru navzkrižja interesov ne bi prišlo do vrzeli v zvezi z odgovornostjo;
Reiterates, moreover, its call to the Commission to provide information on the existence and application of regulations and rules on the cooling-off periods and among comparable cases in all the Agencies before the end of 2012;
znova poziva Komisijo, naj pred koncem leta 2012 zagotovi informacije o tem, ali za prehodno obdobje obstajajo in se izvajajo predpisi in pravila, tudi za podobne primere v vseh agencijah;
Is pleased by the intention of the Court of Auditors to make a comprehensive analysis of the Agencies’ policies approach and concrete practice for the management of the situations of the conflicts of interest, in order to prevent conflicts of interest taking into account the OECD definition of conflict of interest and its related rules;
je zadovoljen z namero Računskega sodišča, da bo celovito preučilo pristop in dejansko prakso agencij pri obravnavi primerov navzkrižja interesov, da bi preprečilo takšna navzkrižja v prihodnje, pri tem pa upoštevalo opredelitev navzkrižja interesov OECD in s tem povezana pravila te organizacije;
Recalls that in its abovementioned resolution of 15 September 2011 on the EU’s efforts to combat corruption, the Parliament called, inter alia, upon the Commission and the Union’s Agencies to ensure more transparency by drawing up codes of conduct or improving those existing codes, with as a minimum clear rules on conflicts of interest;
opozarja, da je Parlament v omenjeni resoluciji z dne 15. septembra 2011 o prizadevanjih EU za boj proti korupciji med drugim pozval Komisijo in agencije Unije, naj zagotavljajo večjo preglednost pri oblikovanju kodeksov ravnanja ali izboljšavah že obstoječih, tako da bodo vsebovali jasna minimalna pravila o navzkrižju interesov;
Recalls that conflicts of interest are a cause of corruption, fraud, mismanagement of funds and human resources, favouritism and have a negative impact on the impartiality of the decisions and quality of work and undermines Union citizens’ trust in the Union institutions, including the Agencies;
ponovno opozarja, da je navzkrižje interesov vzrok za korupcijo, goljufije, nepravilno upravljanje sredstev in kadrovskih virov ter favoriziranje, da negativno vpliva na nepristranskost odločitev in kakovost dela ter spodkopava zaupanje državljanov Unije v njene institucije, vključno z agencijami;
Recruitment of Agencies’ Directors
Zaposlovanje direktorjev agencij
Calls on the Interinstitutional Working Group (IWG) to address the modalities for appointing Agencies’ Directors in order to have an open, transparent and trusty recruitment procedure; in this respect calls on the IWG to ensure that its Joint Statement mentions that the candidates selected for the post of Agencies’ Directors undergo a public interview by Parliament’s committees;
poziva mednarodno delovno skupino, naj določi način imenovanja direktorjev agencij, da bi bil postopek njihovega zaposlovanja odprt, pregleden in pošten; v zvezi s tem delovno skupino poziva, naj zagotovi, da bo v njeni skupni izjavi omenjeno, da se morajo kandidati, izbrani za mesto direktorja agencije, udeležiti javnega razgovora z odbori Parlamenta;
Notes that, for the European Securities and Markets Authority, the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (Agencies which were established in 2010 and began operating in 2011), the Executive Director is appointed by the Board of Supervisors but only after confirmation by the Parliament as discharge authority; stresses that this procedure should be the rule for the appointment of all Agencies’ Executive Directors;
ugotavlja, da izvršnega direktorja Evropskega organa za vrednostne papirje in trge, Evropskega bančnega organa in Evropskega organa za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine (agencije, ki so bile ustanovljene leta 2010 in so začele delovati leta 2011) imenuje odbor nadzornikov, vendar šele po tem, ko imenovanje potrdi Parlament kot organ za podelitev razrešnice; poudarja, da bi moral ta postopek praviloma veljati za imenovanje vseh izvršnih direktorjev agencij;
Fraud prevention
Preprečevanje goljufij
Calls on the Agencies to be more active in the area of fraud identification and prevention, and properly and regularly to communicate on these activities; stresses that the role of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) vis-à-vis Agencies should be formalised, enhanced and made more visible;
poziva agencije, naj si dejavneje prizadevajo za odkrivanje in preprečevanje goljufij ter točno in redno poročajo o teh dejavnostih; poudarja, da bi bilo treba formalizirati in okrepiti vlogo, ki jo ima Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam v agencijah, ter povečati njeno prepoznavnost;
Considers that where the Commission has serious reasons for concern that an Agency is about to take decisions or engage in activities which may not comply with the mandate of the Agency, may violate Union law or be in manifest contradiction to the Union policy objective, it has the duty to immediately inform Parliament and Council to enable them to take appropriate action;
meni, da bi morala Komisija, kadar resno sumi, da bo neka agencija sprejela odločitev ali začela izvajati dejavnost, ki ni v skladu z njeno nalogo, krši pravo Unije ali je v očitnem nasprotju s cilji politike Unije, o tem nemudoma obvestiti Parlament in Svet, da lahko slednja ustrezno ukrepata;
COMMON CHALLENGES ON HUMAN RESOURCES
SKUPNI IZZIVI GLEDE KADROVSKIH VIROV
Urges the Agencies to take the necessary measures to increase the legality, transparency and objectivity of their recruitment processes; notes in fact that once more in several Agencies there are deficiencies in staff selection procedures which put at risk the transparency of these procedures and/or infringe the principle of equal treatment in the application of the eligibility criteria; acknowledges, in particular, that the Court of Auditors repeatedly reports the following deficiencies:
poziva agencije, naj sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da bi povečale objektivnost in preglednost postopkov zaposlovanja; pravzaprav ugotavlja, da se v več agencijah pojavljajo napake v postopkih izbora uslužbencev, zaradi katerih je ogrožena preglednost teh postopkov in/ali ki kršijo načelo enake obravnave pri uporabi merila o izpolnjevanju pogojev; potrjuje zlasti, da je Računsko sodišče že večkrat poročalo o naslednjih pomanjkljivostih:
no evidence exists whether the selection criteria and the thresholds that candidates have to meet to be invited to written tests/interviews are established before the evaluation process begins,
ni dokazov o tem, ali se merila za izbor in pogoji, ki jih morajo izpolniti kandidati, da se jih povabi na pisne preizkuse/razgovore, določijo pred začetkom postopka ocenjevanja,
insufficient documentation of recruitment procedures,
nezadostno dokumentiranje postopkov zaposlovanja,
unequal treatment in the recruitment procedure for internal/external candidates,
različna obravnava notranjih/zunanjih kandidatov v postopku zaposlovanja,
limited competition,
omejena konkurenca;
considers that these deficiencies reduce the ability of the Agencies to: respond to possible allegations of arbitrary decisions on staff recruitment; and take the appropriate redressing decisions;
meni, da te pomanjkljivosti agencijam onemogočajo, da bi se odzvale na morebitne obdolžitve, da so bile odločitve o zaposlitvi samovoljne, in sprejele ustrezne odločitve o popravi napak;
Welcomes Cedefop’s initiative of an online tool for recruitment RECON — Recruitment Online in 2010 which will help the Centre to increase the speed, efficiency and transparency of its recruitment process; calls on all Agencies to follow this procedure;
pozdravlja pobudo agencije Cedefop v letu 2010 za spletno orodje za zaposlovanje RECON – Recruitment Online, ki bo centru pomagalo pospešiti postopek zaposlovanja ter izboljšati njegovo učinkovitost in preglednost; poziva vse agencije, naj sledijo temu zgledu;
Believes that every year there are employees, including directors, who rotate between the Agencies; calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with a table of all staff members, in particular directors and persons in management positions who changed working places from one Agency to another Agency or to another Union institution, at least since 2008;
meni, da je vsako leto nekaj zaposlenih, vključno z direktorji, ki zamenjajo agencijo; poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu posreduje seznam vseh uslužbencev, zlasti direktorjev in oseb na vodstvenih položajih, ki so od leta 2008 zamenjali delovno mesto in prešli iz ene agencije v drugo;
Calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with a detailed table of the criteria applied in order to ensure the independence, impartiality, and proper qualification of the staff recruited, including those criteria aimed at stopping or preventing conflicts of interest, and to apply dissuasive sanctions for any irregularity found;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu posreduje natančen seznam meril, ki se uporabljajo za zagotavljanje neodvisnosti, nepristranskosti in primerne usposobljenosti zaposlenih, vključno z merili, katerih namen je ustaviti ali preprečiti navzkrižje interesov, ter naj uporabi odvračilne sankcije v primerih, ko so bile ugotovljene nepravilnosti;
Regrets that some Agencies still had a high vacancy rate in 2010; calls on those Agencies to take all necessary steps to avoid this situation from occurring again;
obžaluje, da je bila leta 2010 stopnja nezasedenih delovnih mest v nekaterih agencijah še vedno visoka; poziva te agencije, naj sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi se v prihodnje izognile tem težavam;
Sensitive tasks assigned to interim staff
Zaupne naloge začasnih uslužbencev
Calls once more on the Agencies to ensure that sensitive tasks are not assigned to interim staff; deplores the fact that in some cases Agencies hired such staff to perform sensitive tasks or have access to sensitive information; stresses the risks of potential security breaches linked to interim staff’s access to sensitive information, and unawareness by them of the procedure to follow or indeed conflicts of interest;
ponovno poziva agencije, naj zagotovijo, da se naloge zaupne narave ne dodeljujejo začasnim uslužbencem; obžaluje, da so agencije v nekaterih primerih namensko najele začasno osebje, ki izvaja naloge zaupne narave ali ima dostop do zaupnih informacij; opozarja na tveganje morebitnih varnostnih kršitev, povezanih z dostopom začasnih uslužbencev do zaupnih informacij ali njihovim nepoznavanjem postopkov, ki jih je treba izvesti, oziroma dejanskim navzkrižjem interesov;
Flexible working hours — leave
Prilagodljiv delovni čas – dopust
Calls on all Agencies to inform the relevant discharge authority of the number of days of leave authorised to each grade under the flexitime and compensatory leave schemes in 2010;
poziva vse agencije, naj zadevni organ za podelitev razrešnice obvestijo o številu dni dopusta, odobrenega vsakemu razredu v programu prilagodljivega časa in kompenzacijskega dopusta v letu 2010;
V. CHALLENGES ON INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM
V. IZZIVI GLEDE SISTEMOV NOTRANJE KONTROLE
Encourages the Agencies to further improve their internal control systems to underpin their Director’s annual declaration of assurance; stresses, in addition, the importance for an Agency to effectively establish a risk management function for registering risks and creating plans for mitigating actions;
spodbuja agencije, naj še nadalje izboljšujejo sisteme notranje kontrole, da podprejo izjave o zanesljivosti svojih direktorjev; poleg tega poudarja, da je za agencije pomembna učinkovita vzpostavitev funkcije upravljanja tveganja, da bi evidentirale tveganja in oblikovale načrte za blažilne ukrepe;
Internal Audit Service (IAS)
Služba za notranjo revizijo
Notes that under the legislation in force the Agencies are not obliged to make the IAS reports available to the Budgetary Control Committee per se; considers it a flaw in the legislation; takes the view that the Internal Auditor’s reports should be made available to members of the Committee on Budgetary Control, possibly on a restricted-access basis; urges the co-legislators to amend the Financial Regulations during the current negotiations to require the Internal Auditor to forward his reports to the discharge authority via the secretariat of the Committee on Budgetary Control;
ugotavlja, da po trenutno veljavni zakonodaji agencijam poročil službe za notranjo revizijo ni treba dati na voljo Odboru za proračunski nadzor; meni, da je to pomanjkljivost v zakonodaji; meni, da je treba poročilo notranjega revizorja dati na voljo članom Odbora za proračunski nadzor, mogoče z omejenim dostopom; poziva sozakonodajalca, nam v okviru potekajočih pogajanj finančne uredbe popravi tako, da bodo notranjega revizorja zavezovale, naj svoje poročilo pošlje organu za podelitev razrešnice prek sekretariata Odbora za proračunski nadzor;
Considers that the role of the IAS as internal auditor of the decentralised Agencies is crucial; stresses, in particular, that the IAS issues independent opinions on the quality of management and control systems and delivers recommendations for improving the conditions of implementation of operations and for promoting sound financial management of the Agencies;
meni, da je vloga službe za notranjo revizijo kot notranjega revizorja decentraliziranih agencij bistvena; poudarja predvsem, da ta služba izdaja neodvisna mnenja o kakovosti sistemov upravljanja in kontrole ter podaja priporočila za izboljšanje pogojev izvajanja dejavnosti in za spodbujanje dobrega finančnega poslovodenja agencij;
Calls, accordingly, on the Agencies’ Management Boards to duly take into account the recommendations made by the IAS, with a view to rapidly remedying the identified failings and to justify to the discharge authority rejections and delays in the implementation of the IAS recommendations;
zato poziva upravne odbore agencij, naj priporočila službe za notranjo revizijo dosledno upoštevajo, da bi lahko hitro odpravili ugotovljene napake ter pred organom za podelitev razrešnice utemeljili zavrnitve in zamude pri izvajanju njenih priporočil;
CHALLENGES ON EXTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM
IZZIVI GLEDE SISTEMOV ZUNANJE KONTROLE
The Court of Auditors’ audits on the Agencies
Revizije Računskega sodišča v agencijah
Notes that both the IAS and the Court of Auditors give recommendations to the Agencies to address their shortcomings; welcomes the effort of both audit institutions to supply Agencies with useful advice so that they can correct their shortcomings; firmly reminds the Agencies to take the recommendations seriously and undertake the necessary measures to correct their shortcomings; demands that the IAS inform the budgetary authority about shortcomings in the reports compiled by Agencies’ directors corresponding to Article 72(5) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 and to openly publish the recommendations given to the Agencies in order to guarantee the public interest and thus the effectiveness of their auditing tasks;
ugotavlja, da služba za notranjo revizijo in Računsko sodišče agencijam izdajata priporočila za odpravo pomanjkljivosti; pozdravlja prizadevanja obeh revizijskih organov, ki agencijam ponujata koristne nasvete, da lahko odpravijo svoje pomanjkljivosti; odločno opozarja agencije, naj priporočila vzamejo resno in sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi pomanjkljivosti odpravile; zahteva, da služba za notranjo revizijo proračunski organ obvesti o pomanjkljivostih v poročilih, ki jih pripravijo direktorji agencij v skladu s členom 72(5) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002, ter javno objavi priporočila, ki jih je podala agencijam, da bi zavarovala javni interes in s tem tudi učinkovitost svojih revizijskih nalog;
Notes that the Court of Auditors has issued 32 public documents on the Agencies in 2010 that were all published in the Official Journal of the European Union and are available on the websites of both the Court of Auditors and the Budgetary Control Committee; encourages the Court of Auditors, therefore, to continue exercising its auditing functions on the Agencies in a thorough and impartial manner and reflect all its findings and recommendations through its public annual or special reports to enable the budgetary authority to fulfil its discharging function fully and ensure that Union citizens are kept informed;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v letu 2010 izdalo 32 javnih dokumentov o agencijah EU, ki so bili objavljeni v Uradnem listu Evropske unije ter so na voljo na spletnih mestih Računskega sodišča in Odbora za proračunski nadzor; spodbuja Računsko sodišče, naj še naprej izvaja revizije agencij na nepristranski način ter svoje ugotovitve in priporočila predstavi v javnih letnih ali posebnih poročilih, da bi lahko proračunski organ v celoti opravil svojo nalogo podelitve razrešnice in zagotovil, da bodo državljani Unije obveščeni;