natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Takes note that a pilot project was developed in 2015 aimed at exploring the best way to implement the recommendation of the discharge authority to centralise the validation process of the declarations of interest; observes that this pilot project was successfully concluded in the same year and that full centralisation was expected to be implemented by the end of first semester of 2016; calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority on the successful implementation of this centralisation;
je seznanjen, da je bil leta 2015 pripravljen pilotni projekt, da se preuči, kako je mogoče na najboljši način upoštevati priporočilo organa za podelitev razrešnice o centralizaciji postopka vrednotenja izjav o interesih; ugotavlja, da je bil pilotni projekt v istem letu uspešno zaključen in da naj bi bila popolna centralizacija uvedena do konca prvega semestra leta 2016; poziva agencijo, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o uspešni uvedbi te centralizacije;
Observes that during 2014 the Authority received a number of contributions on independence-related issues from stakeholders and non-governmental organisations; notes, furthermore, that these contributed to the review of implementing rules for the independence policy;
ugotavlja, da je agencija leta 2014 od deležnikov in nevladnih organizacij prejela več prispevkov o vprašanjih v zvezi z neodvisnostjo; ugotavlja tudi, da je to prispevalo k pregledu izvedbenih pravil za politiko o neodvisnosti;
Calls for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest, the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries;
poziva, naj se s celostnim pristopom na splošno izboljšata preprečevanje korupcije in boj proti njej, za kar je najprej treba izboljšati dostop javnosti do dokumentov in uvesti strožja pravila glede nasprotja interesov, uvesti ali okrepiti registre za preglednost in zagotoviti zadostne vire za ukrepe kazenskega pregona, tudi z izboljšanjem sodelovanja med državami članicami in z ustreznimi tretjimi državami;
Encourages the Authority further to raise awareness of the conflict-of-interest policy among its staff, alongside ongoing awareness-raising activities and the inclusion of integrity and transparency as an obligatory item to be discussed during recruitment procedures and performance reviews;
spodbuja agencijo k nadaljnjemu ozaveščanju svojih zaposlenih o politiki v zvezi z nasprotjem interesov, skupaj z obstoječimi dejavnostmi ozaveščanja ter vključevanjem integritete in preglednosti kot obveznih točk razprave v postopke zaposlovanja in preglede uspešnosti;
Points out that several Union rules, including amongst others the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, give individuals the right to access public documents; reminds the Authority that scientific rigour is ensured best by transparency and accountability of the results; highlights that the Authority should make therefore all data used to reach any scientific conclusions public in a machine-readable format so as to enable scientific scrutiny and constant progress;
poudarja, da imajo posamezniki na podlagi različnih predpisov Unije, med drugim tudi Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, pravico dostopa do javnih dokumentov; opozarja agencijo, da se za znanstveno doslednost najbolje poskrbi s preglednostjo in odgovornostjo rezultatov; poudarja, da bi morala agencija zato dati javnosti na voljo vse podatke, uporabljene za dosego kakršne koli znanstvene ugotovitve, in sicer v strojno berljivi obliki, da se omogoči znanstveni nadzor in stalen napredek;
Acknowledges the Authority's efforts to improve the transparency of its work as well as the data it uses for that work; acknowledges the existing legal limitations it faces for increasing data transparency; stresses that the aim of the disclosure is to make reproducibility of the Authority's work possible and therefore the steps taken towards process transparency in risk-assessment are a welcome first step, but that data transparency should also be ensured; welcomes, in this respect, the launch, in January 2013, of the transparency initiative; welcomes, in this context, the improved presentation and accessibility of information and documents on the Authority's homepage and other action taken, such as risk assessment opinions and the impact they have on Union citizens, towards an ‘open EFSA’; encourages the Authority to further progress on this path;
priznava prizadevanja agencije za povečanje preglednosti svojega dela in podatkov, ki jih pri tem uporablja; je seznanjen z obstoječimi pravnimi omejitvami, s katerimi se sooča, ko poskuša povečati preglednosti podatkov; poudarja, da je namen razkrivanja v omogočanju ponovljivosti dela agencije in da so zato ukrepi v smeri preglednosti postopkov pri ocenjevanju tveganja dobrodošel prvi korak, a bi bilo treba vseeno zagotoviti tudi preglednost podatkov; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja sprožitev pobude za preglednost v januarju 2013; v tem kontekstu pozdravlja boljšo predstavitev in dostopnost informacij in dokumentov na domači spletni strani agencije ter druge ukrepe, ki jih je sprejela za „odprto EFSA“, kot so mnenja glede ocene tveganja in vpliv, ki ga imajo na državljane Unije; spodbuja agencijo, naj nadaljuje po tej poti;
Takes note that the Authority's staff are legally bound to comply with the Staff Regulations regarding future employment; notes, in addition, that the assessment of staff’s future employment occurs on a systematic basis, and that if the employment is considered to be a potential conflict of interest no appointment should be made until that potential conflict has been resolved on the basis of clear, transparent and verifiable criteria; points out that in 2013, of the 29 statutory staff members that left the employment at the Authority, three went to the chemical/pharmaceutical sector with a range of restrictions put in place for these individuals; acknowledges that the Authority considers that a clear legal and governance framework on revolving doors is already in place;
se zaveda, da so uslužbenci agencije v zvezi s prihodnjo zaposlitvijo pravno zavezani k spoštovanju Kadrovskih predpisov; poleg tega ugotavlja, da se prihodnja zaposlitev uslužbencev ocenjuje sistematično in da je mogoče zaposlitev, če bi vključevala morebitno nasprotje interesov, preklicati, dokler se to nasprotje ne reši v skladu z jasnimi, preglednimi in preverljivimi merili; poudarja, da so se trije od 29 nekdanjih uslužbencev agencije leta 2013 zaposlili v kemijskem/farmacevtskem sektorju, zanje pa je veljala vrsta omejitev; je seznanjen z mnenjem agencije, da je za izmenično zaposlovanje v javnem in zasebnem sektorju že uveden jasen pravni okvir;
Acknowledges that the Authority carried out an internal exercise to assess the impact of removing the possibility for experts to anonymise certain interests in their declarations of interest; notes from the Authority that the practice of anonymising interests has been used on very few occasions in the past; notes furthermore that for the latest renewal of panel members in 2015, no scientific experts chose to anonymise their interests; notes with satisfaction that the Authority no longer accepts anonymised interests and has withdrawn this option for experts when completing their declaration of interests; asks the Authority to check the declarations submitted by experts who were appointed before 2015 and who took advantage of the option of anonymising their interests;
je seznanjen s tem, da je agencija izvedla notranjo oceno učinka odprave možnosti, da strokovnjaki v svojih izjavah o interesih anonimizirajo nekatere interese; je seznanjen z ugotovitvami agencije, da se je v preteklosti praksa anonimiziranja interesov uporabila le zelo redko; poleg tega ugotavlja, da se pri zadnji zamenjavi članov sveta leta 2015 noben znanstveni strokovnjak ni odločil anonimizirati svojih interesov; z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da agencija ne sprejema več anonimiziranih interesov in te možnosti pri izpolnjevanju izjave o interesih strokovnjakom ne daje več; poziva agencijo, naj preveri izjave strokovnjakov, ki so bili zaposleni pred letom 2015 in so izkoristili možnost anonimiziranja interesov;
Requests that the Authority implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations by publishing information about senior officials who have left the service and a list of conflicts of interest on an annual basis;
zahteva, naj agencija ravna v skladu s členom 16 kadrovskih predpisov EU in da enkrat na leto objavi podatke o višjih uradnikih, ki niso več zaposleni pri njej, pa tudi seznam nasprotij interesov;
Is looking forward to results of the Authority's systemic review of its policy on independence and scientific decision-making process in 2016; welcomes the Authority's commitment to consider the publication of remunerations for experts' declared activities;
z zanimanjem pričakuje rezultate sistemskega pregleda agencije, kar zadeva njeno politiko neodvisnosti in postopek znanstvenega odločanja v letu 2016; pozdravlja zavezo agencije, da bo preučila možnost objave osebnih prejemkov strokovnjakov za njihove prijavljene dejavnosti;
Calls on the Authority to make more extensive use of a new status for hearing experts following the example of the invited experts from World Health Organisation's International Agency for Research Against Cancer; calls on the Authority to report to the discharge authority on making use of hearing experts;
poziva agencijo, naj v večjem obsegu uporablja novi status za zaslišanja strokovnjakov po zgledu povabljenih strokovnjakov Mednarodne agencije za raziskave raka, ki deluje v okviru Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije; poziva agencijo, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o uporabi zaslišanj strokovnjakov;
Stresses that experts in regulatory agencies must be paid for their work so as to enable their independence from the sector they regulate; calls on the Commission to provide the financial means for the Authority to pay external experts and develop in-house research to ensure independence;
poudarja, da morajo biti strokovnjaki v regulativnih agencijah plačani za svoje delo, da so lahko neodvisni od sektorja, ki ga regulirajo; poziva Komisijo, naj agenciji zagotovi finančna sredstva, da bo ta lahko plačevala zunanje strokovnjake in razvijala notranje raziskave ter si tako zagotavljala neodvisnost;
Asks the responsible body of the Authority to implement the anti-fraud strategy as soon as possible;
poziva pristojni organ agencije, naj začne čim prej izvajati strategijo za boj proti goljufijam;
Notes that six recommendations issued by the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) and marked as ‘Very important’ were open at the beginning of 2014; acknowledges that four of the very important recommendations were reported as implemented by the Authority and are currently awaiting a follow-up by the IAS; observes that the remaining two were closed by IAS following the introduction of the new Staff Regulations in the financial year 2014; looks forward to the next IAS’ review on the status of implemented recommendations;
ugotavlja, da je bilo šest priporočil službe Komisije za notranjo revizijo, ki so bila označena kot zelo pomembna, na začetku leta 2014 nerešenih; ugotavlja, da so bila v skladu z dokumentacijo agencije štiri od teh priporočil izvedena in se zanje čaka nadaljnje ukrepanje službe Komisije za notranjo revizijo; ugotavlja, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo ostali dve priporočili po uvedbi novih kadrovskih predpisov v proračunskem letu 2014 zaključila; z zanimanjem pričakuje naslednji pregled službe Komisije za notranjo revizijo o stanju izvedenih priporočil;
Acknowledges that the Authority carried out a simulation to assess the impact of applying a two-year cooling-off period for certain interests of experts working in the Authority’s panels; notes with satisfaction that the Authority is to introduce two-year cooling-off periods in relation to the abovementioned interests in time for the next panel renewal; takes note that with regard to cooling-off periods for research funding, the Authority already has a system in place that limits private sourcing of research funding to a maximum of 25 % of the total research budget under control of an Authority’s expert;
je seznanjen s tem, da je agencija s simulacijo ocenila učinek uvedbe dvoletnega obdobja mirovanja za nekatere interese strokovnjakov, ki delajo v njenih svetih; z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da namerava do naslednje zamenjave sveta uvesti dvoletno obdobje mirovanja za te interese; ugotavlja, da ima agencija za obdobja mirovanja za financiranje raziskav že na voljo sistem, v skladu s katerim je to financiranje z zasebnimi sredstvi omejeno na največ 25 % vsega proračuna za raziskave pod nadzorom strokovnjaka agencije;
Acknowledges that the review of the Authority's Internal Control Standards carried out in 2014 concluded that its internal control system is compliant with those standards; notes, however, that there are areas where improvements could be achieved to enhance the quality of the internal control system, in particular regarding the staff evaluation and development, operational structure and evaluation of activities; calls on the Authority to provide the discharge authority with a report on the actions planned to tackle this issue and the progress made in this regard;
je seznanjen s tem, da je bilo pri pregledu standardov agencije za notranje kontrole, opravljenem leta 2014, ugotovljeno, da je sistem notranjih kontrol skladen s temi standardi; vseeno ugotavlja, da so na nekaterih področjih možne izboljšave, da se poveča kakovost sistema notranjih kontrol, zlasti kar zadeva ocenjevanje in napredovanje uslužbencev, operativno strukturo in ocenjevanje dejavnosti; poziva agencijo, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice predloži poročilo o ukrepih, ki jih namerava sprejeti za reševanje tega vprašanja, in o napredku, doseženem v zvezi s tem;
Ascertains that the Authority's Internal Audit Capability (IAC) considers that the internal control system in place provides reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of the business objectives set up for the processes audited, except for the monitoring of user access rights granted in the ABAC accounting system and the formal nomination of financial actors; calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority on the advancements made in this regard;
ugotavlja, da skupina za notranjo revizijo pri agenciji meni, da obstoječi sistem notranjih kontrol zagotavlja razumno zagotovilo v zvezi z doseganjem poslovnih ciljev, določenih za procese, ki so predmet revizije, razen za spremljanje pravic do uporabniškega dostopa v računovodskem sistemu ABAC in za uradno imenovanje finančnih udeležencev; poziva agencijo, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o napredku v zvezi s tem;
Notes that the IAC followed up on all outstanding corrective actions in the areas of data management, business continuity and IT security; notes in particular that actions concerning data management and IT security have been fully implemented; takes note that, regarding business continuity, the majority of actions have been implemented and the remaining actions are planned to be implemented by the end of 2016;
ugotavlja, da je skupina za notranjo revizijo spremljala vse odprte popravljalne ukrepe na področju upravljanja podatkov, neprekinjenosti poslovanja in informacijske varnosti; zlasti ugotavlja, da so bili ukrepi v zvezi z upravljanjem podatkov in informacijsko varnostjo v celoti izvedeni; je seznanjen s tem, da je bila večina ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na neprekinjenost poslovanja, izvedena, preostali ukrepi pa se bodo predvidoma izvedli do konca leta 2016;
Notes from the Court’s report that, following the amendment of the Staff Regulations in 2004 by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 [1], these included provisions that future remuneration of officials recruited before 1 May 2004 should not be less than under the previous Staff Regulations; observes that the Court 's audit revealed this was not complied with and, in the case of eight out of the 71 officials employed at the time, this led to an underpayment of EUR 87000 for the period of years 2005-2014; notes that the Authority will undertake the necessary actions to remedy this issue in due course;
je seznanjen, da iz poročila Računskega sodišča izhaja, da Kadrovski predpisi po spremembi leta 2004 z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 723/2004 [1] vključujejo določbe, po kateri prihodnji prejemki uradnikov, ki so bili zaposleni pred 1. majem 2004, ne smejo biti nižji, kot so bili po prejšnjih kadrovskih predpisih; ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče med revizijo ugotovilo, da to ni bilo upoštevano in je bilo zaradi tega osmim od 71 takrat zaposlenih uradnikov v obdobju 2005–2014 izplačanih 87000 EUR premalo; je seznanjen, da bo agencija za rešitev tega vprašanja sprejela ustrezne ukrepe;
Notes with satisfaction that the Authority has developed a number of measures to support openness and transparency goals as well as dialogue with stakeholders, including representatives of civil society; takes note that the Authority launched new initiatives to further engage society in the Authority's risk assessment process such as plenary meetings in Brussels with a dedicated session to interact with observers and stakeholders, public consultations of scoping papers of guidance documents, public consultations on draft opinions followed by dedicated stakeholder meetings and presence on social media;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je agencija razvila več ukrepov v podporo ciljem glede odprtosti in preglednosti ter dialogu z deležniki, vključno s predstavniki civilne družbe; ugotavlja, da je agencija začela nove pobude, da bi družbo še bolj vključila v svoj postopek ocene učinka, kot so plenarna zasedanja v Bruslju z namenskimi sejami za stike z opazovalci in deležniki, javni posveti v zvezi s predhodnimi študijami smernic, javni posveti v zvezi z osnutki mnenj, ki jim sledijo namenske seje deležnikov, in navzočnost v družbenih medijih;
Acknowledges that a large part of the difficulties the Authority is facing in securing its independence comes from the fact that the Commission consistently refuses to allocate it sufficient means of operation to work at defending food safety for Union citizens independently of the regulated industry's influence;
priznava, da je velik del težav, s katerimi se agencija sooča pri zagotavljanju svoje neodvisnosti, posledica doslednega zavračanja Komisije, da bi ji dodelila zadostna sredstva za delovanje, s katerimi bi si lahko neodvisno od vplivov zadevne panoge prizadevala za varnost hrane za državljane Unije;
Welcomes the Authority's efforts to implement corrective actions following the previous comments by the Court, particularly the improvements made to its annual work programme to include more details on planned procurements and grants;
pozdravlja prizadevanja agencije, da bi uvedla popravljalne ukrepe na osnovi prejšnjih pripomb Računskega sodišča, zlasti izboljšanje njenega letnega delovnega programa z vključitvijo več podrobnosti o načrtovanih javnih naročilih in dodelitvah nepovratnih sredstev;
Refers, for other observations of a cross-cutting nature accompanying its decision on discharge, to its resolution of 28 April 2016 [2] on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.
sporoča, da so druge ugotovitve horizontalne narave, ki spremljajo sklep o razrešnici, zbrane v resoluciji z dne 28. aprila 2016 [2] o uspešnosti, finančnem poslovodenju in nadzoru agencij.
Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities (OJ L 124, 27.4.2004, p.
Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 723/2004 z dne 22. marca 2004 o spremembi Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti in pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 124, 27.4.2004, str.
Resolution (EU) 2016/1526 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU) 2016/1526
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2014
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov za proračunsko leto 2014
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2014,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov za proračunsko leto 2014,
A. whereas, according to its financial statements, the final budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality (“the Institute”) for the financial year 2014 was EUR 7340081, representing a decrease of 3,08 % compared to 2013;
A. ker računovodski izkazi Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov (v nadaljevanju: inštitut) kažejo, da je končni proračun inštituta v proračunskem letu 2014 znašal 7340081 EUR, kar je za 3,08 % manj kot leta 2013;
B. whereas the Court of Auditors (“the Court”), in its report on the annual accounts of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2014 (“the Court's report”), stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Institute’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular;
B. ker je Računsko sodišče v poročilu o zaključnem računu inštituta za proračunsko leto 2014 (v nadaljevanju: poročilo Računskega sodišča) navedlo, da je prejelo razumno zagotovilo o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov inštituta za proračunsko leto 2014 ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij;
Recalls that the Institute was established in order to contribute to and strengthen the promotion of gender equality including, first and foremost, gender mainstreaming in all Union policies and the resulting national policies, and the fight against discrimination based on sex, and to raise Union citizens' awareness of gender equality; notes with satisfaction that in 2014 the Institute achieved 95 % of its planned output; stresses that the objectives and tasks of the Institute require the maintenance of a separate dedicated entity within the institutional framework of the Union;
opozarja, da je bil inštitut ustanovljen zato, da bi prispeval k spodbujanju enakosti spolov in jo krepil, med drugim z vključevanjem načela enakosti spolov v vse politike Unije in državne politike, oblikovane na njihovi osnovi, se boril proti diskriminaciji na podlagi spola ter ozaveščal državljane Unije o enakosti spolov; z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je inštitut leta 2014 dosegel 95 % načrtovanih rezultatov; poudarja, da je zaradi ciljev in nalog, ki jih ima inštitut, potreben poseben, temu namenjen organ v institucionalnem okviru Unije;
Notes that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2014 resulted in a high budget implementation rate of 99,04 % indicating that commitments were made in a timely manner; notes that the payment appropriations execution rate was 71,91 %, representing an increase of 1,75 % compared to the previous year;
ugotavlja, da je bila zaradi proračunskega spremljanja v proračunskem letu 2014 stopnja izvrševanja proračuna visoka, in sicer 99,04 %, kar kaže, da so bile obveznosti prevzete pravočasno; ugotavlja, da je stopnja izvrševanja plačil znašala 71,91 %, kar je 1,75 % več kot leto prej;