natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes the simultaneous publication of the roadmaps initiating the revision of the regulations establishing the three tripartite agencies of the Union, CEDEFOP, EU-OSHA and Eurofound; emphasises that the revisions should preserve the key roles of these highly reputable agencies and their tripartite nature, ensuring active participation of national authorities, trade unions and employer representatives in their governance and functioning;
je seznanjen, da so bili sočasno objavljeni časovni načrti za revizijo uredb o ustanovitvi treh tristranskih agencij Unije, CEDEFOP, EU-OSHA in Eurofounda; poudarja, da bi morale biti pri reviziji ohranjene osrednje vloge teh uglednih agencij in njihova tristranska narava, kar bi zagotovilo dejavno udeležbo nacionalnih organov, sindikatov in predstavnikov delodajalcev pri njihovem vodenju in delovanju;
Reaffirms that the discussion of the draft annual work programmes and the multiannual strategies of the agencies in Parliament's competent committees helps to ensure that the programmes and strategies reflect actual political priorities but stresses the need to align the Union’s budgetary cycle with the EU 2020 Strategy so as to be able to monitor fully and comprehensively report on the performance of each of the agencies in the context of their contribution to achieving EU 2020 objectives;
potrjuje, da razprava o osnutkih letnih delovnih programov in večletnih strategijah agencij v pristojnih odborih Parlamenta prispeva k temu, da ti programi in strategije ustrezajo dejanskim političnim prednostnim nalogam, vendar poudarja, da je treba proračunski cikel Unije uskladiti s strategijo EU 2020, da bo mogoče celovito spremljati uspešnost posameznih agencij pri njihovih prispevkih k doseganju ciljev EU do leta 2020 ter poročati o tem;
Acknowledges the good practice of collaboration among the agencies in the areas of living and working conditions, vocational training and occupational safety and health, which maximise synergies and cooperation and enhance complementarity; also welcomes and encourages the continuation of the exchange of good practices between the Commission and the agencies;
je seznanjen z dobro prakso sodelovanja med agencijami na področju življenjskih in delovnih razmer, poklicnega usposabljanja ter varnosti in zdravja pri delu, kar prispeva k sinergijam in sodelovanju ter dopolnjevanju; prav tako pozdravlja in spodbuja nadaljevanje izmenjave dobre prakse med Komisijo in agencijami;
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the agencies subject to this discharge procedure, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje agencijam, ki so vključene v ta postopek podelitve razrešnice, Svetu, Komisiji in Računskemu sodišču ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
Resolution (EU) 2016/2153 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU) 2016/2153
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2014, Section II — European Council and Council
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2014, oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2014, Section II — European Council and Council,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2014, oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet,
B. whereas the European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be democratically accountable towards the citizens of the Union as far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union;
B. ker bi morala biti Evropski svet in Svet kot instituciji Unije demokratično odgovorna državljanom Unije, saj prejemata sredstva iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije;
Recalls the Parliament's role specified in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and in Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (the ‘Financial Regulation’) in respect of the budget discharge;
opozarja na vlogo Parlamenta pri podelitvi razrešnice za izvrševanje proračuna, določeno v Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in v Uredbi (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: finančna uredba);
Points out that under Article 335 TFEU, ‘[…] the Union shall be represented by each of the institutions, by virtue of their administrative autonomy, in matters relating to their respective operation’, and that accordingly, taking into account Article 55 of the Financial Regulation, the institutions are individually responsible for the implementation of their budgets;
poudarja, da v skladu s členom 335 PDEU „[…] v zadevah, povezanih z delovanjem posameznih institucij, Unijo zastopa vsaka institucija na podlagi svoje upravne avtonomije“, kar pomeni, da so ob upoštevanju člena 55 finančne uredbe institucije vsaka posebej odgovorne za izvrševanje svojega proračuna;
Stresses the role of Parliament and of other institutions within the discharge procedure, as governed by the provisions of the Financial Regulation, in particular Articles 164 to 166 thereof;
poudarja vlogo Parlamenta in drugih institucij v postopku razrešnice v skladu z določbami finančne uredbe, zlasti členov 164 do 166;
Notes that under Rule 94 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure, ‘the provisions governing the procedure for granting discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget shall likewise apply to the procedure for granting discharge to […] the persons responsible for the implementation of the budgets of other institutions and bodies of the European Union such as the Council (as regards its activity as executive) […]’;
ugotavlja, da se v skladu s členom 94 Poslovnika Parlamenta „določbe, ki urejajo postopek podelitve razrešnice Komisiji glede izvrševanja proračuna, […] smiselno uporabljajo tudi za […] postopek podelitve razrešnice osebam, odgovornim za izvrševanje proračunov drugih institucij in organov Evropske unije, kot so Svet (glede njegovega delovanja kot izvršilnega organa) […]“;
Regrets that the Council continues to be silent in relation to the remarks made by Parliament in its discharge resolution of 28 April 2016 [1] on the trend from previous years of increasing underspending and carryovers of commitments;
obžaluje, da Svet še vedno molči v zvezi s pripombami, ki jih je podal Parlament v resoluciji o podelitvi razrešnice z dne 28. aprila 2016 [1] o razvoju iz prejšnjih let, čedalje večji nezadostni porabi in prenosih sredstev;
Regrets that the European Council and the Council do not provide Parliament with their annual activity report; regards this as inadmissible and detrimental to the reputation of the institutions;
obžaluje, da Evropski svet in Svet ne predložita Parlamentu svojega letnega poročila o dejavnosti; meni, da je to nedopustno in da škoduje ugledu institucij;
Regrets that the budget of the European Council and the Council have not yet been separated, as recommended by Parliament in recent discharge resolutions;
obžaluje, da proračun Evropskega sveta in Sveta še nista bila ločena, kot je Parlament priporočil v nedavnih resolucijah o razrešnicah;
Notes the information on the building policy provided in the Council's website; also notes that there is no information about the costs incurred in relation to those buildings; calls for detailed information to be given to Parliament in the next annual financial report;
je seznanjen z informacijami o nepremičninski politiki na spletnem mestu Sveta; ugotavlja tudi, da ni podatkov o stroških, ki so nastali v zvezi s stavbami; poziva, naj se Parlamentu v naslednjem letnem finančnem poročilu predložijo podrobne informacije;
Reiterates its call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date; calls for information on the costs related to the delayed completion of the Europa building;
ponovno poziva k poročilom o napredku nepremičninskih projektov in podrobni razčlenitvi doslej nastalih stroškov; poziva, naj se zagotovijo informacije o stroških, povezanih z zamudo dokončanja stavbe Evropa;
Reiterates its call on the Council to provide information on its process of administrative modernisation, in particular on the anticipated impact on the Council's budget;
ponovno poziva Svet, naj posreduje informacije o svojem postopku pravne posodobitve, zlasti o predvidenih posledicah za svoj proračun;
Calls on the Council to adopt a code of conduct as soon as possible in order to ensure the integrity of the institution; reiterates its call on the Council to implement whistleblowing rules without further delay;
poziva Svet, naj čim prej sprejme kodeks ravnanja, da bo zagotovil integriteto institucije; ponovno ga poziva, naj začne brez nadaljnjega odlašanja izvajati notranja pravila o prijaviteljih nepravilnosti;
Calls on the Council to join the Union transparency register to ensure transparency and accountability of the institution;
poziva Svet, naj sodeluje pri registru preglednosti Unije, da bo zagotovil preglednost in odgovornost institucije;
Reiterates its call on the Council to develop detailed anti-corruption guidelines and independent policies within its structures, as well as its call with regard to systematic increase of transparency of the legislative procedures and negotiations;
znova poziva Svet, naj oblikuje podrobne smernice proti korupciji in neodvisne politike znotraj svojih struktur, poziva pa tudi k sistematičnemu povečanju preglednosti zakonodajnih postopkov in pogajanj;
Regrets the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council; points out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 for the reasons set out in its resolutions of 10 May 2011 [2], 25 October 2011 [3], 10 May 2012 [4], 23 October 2012 [5], 17 April 2013 [6], 9 October 2013 [7], 3 April 2014 [8], 23 October 2014 [9] and 27 October 2015 [10] and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2014 for the reasons set out in its abovementioned resolution of 28 April 2016;
obžaluje, da so se v dosedanjih postopkih podelitve razrešnice vedno znova pojavljale težave, ker Svet ni bil pripravljen sodelovati; poudarja, da je Parlament zavrnil podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunska leta 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 in 2013 in razloge za to navedel v resolucijah z dne 10. maja 2011 [2], 25. oktobra 2011 [3], 10. maja 2012 [4], 23. oktobra 2012 [5], 17. aprila 2013 [6], 9. oktobra 2013 [7], 3. aprila 2014 [8], 23. oktobra 2014 [9] in 27. oktobra 2015 [10], podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunsko leto 2014 pa je odložil zaradi razlogov, ki jih je navedel v svoji zgoraj navedeni resoluciji z dne 28. aprila 2016;
Insists that an effective budgetary control exercise requires the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, as set out in its abovementioned resolution of 28 April 2016; confirms that Parliament is unable to make an informed decision on granting discharge;
vztraja, da je za izvajanje učinkovitega proračunskega nadzora potrebno sodelovanje Parlamenta in Sveta, kot je navedel v svoji zgoraj navedeni resoluciji z dne 28. aprila 2016; potrjuje, da Parlament ne more sprejeti informirane odločitve o podelitvi razrešnice;
Reminds the Council of the Commission's view, expressed in January 2014, that all institutions are fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure;
opozarja Svet na stališče Komisije iz pisma iz januarja 2014, da so vse institucije v celoti del procesa nadaljnjih ukrepov v zvezi z ugotovitvami Parlamenta v postopku podelitve razrešnice in da bi morale sodelovati, da bo postopek razrešnice potekal nemoteno;
Notes that the Commission has stated that it will not oversee the implementation of the budget of the other institutions and that giving a response to questions addressed to another institution would infringe the autonomy of that institution to implement its own section of the budget;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija navedla, da ne bo nadzorovala izvrševanja proračunov drugih institucij in da bi odgovarjanje na vprašanja, naslovljena na drugo institucijo, posegalo v avtonomijo te institucije pri izvrševanju lastnega dela proračuna;
Regrets that the Council continues to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions; recalls the conclusions of the Parliament workshop on Parliament's right to grant discharge to the Council held on 27 September 2012; recalls also the third subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU, which stipulates that each institution, body, office or agency is to ensure that its proceedings are transparent;
obžaluje, da Svet še vedno ni odgovoril na vprašanja Parlamenta; opozarja na ugotovitve z delavnice Parlamenta o pravici Parlamenta do podelitve razrešnice Svetu, ki je potekala 27. septembra 2012; opozarja tudi na tretji pododstavek člena 15(3) PDEU, ki določa, da mora vsaka institucija, organ, urad ali agencija zagotoviti preglednost svojih postopkov;
Notes that only three out of twenty-seven questions submitted to the Council by the members of the Committee on Budgetary Control in relation to the financial year 2014 received a clear reply in the documents provided by the Council within the discharge exercise;
ugotavlja, da so samo tri od sedemindvajsetih vprašanj, ki so jih Svetu predložili člani Odbora za proračunski nadzor v zvezi s proračunskim letom 2014, dobila jasen odgovor v dokumentih, ki jih je predložil Svet v postopku podelitve razrešnice;
Emphasises Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge pursuant to Articles 316, 317 and 319 TFEU, in line with current interpretation and practice, namely to grant discharge of each heading of the budget individually in order to maintain transparency and democratic accountability towards Union taxpayers;
opozarja na pristojnost Parlamenta za podelitev razrešnice na podlagi členov 316, 317 in 319 PDEU, ki je v skladu s sedanjo razlago in prakso, in sicer da razrešnico podeli za vsak proračunski naslov posebej, da se ohranita preglednost in demokratična odgovornost davkoplačevalcem Unije;
Takes the stance that this constitutes a serious failure to comply with the obligations laid down by the Treaties and believes that the relevant stakeholders need to take the necessary steps to address this issue without further delay; stresses that a revision of the Treaties and of the Financial Regulation is needed in order to clarify the objectives and processes of the discharge procedure, and to define sanctions for failing to comply with the rules as stated in the Treaties;
zagovarja stališče, da gre za hudo kršitev obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Pogodb, in meni, da morajo ustrezni deležniki sprejeti potrebne ukrepe, da se to vprašanje reši brez odlašanja; poudarja, da je treba revidirati Pogodbi in finančno uredbo, da se pojasnijo cilji in postopki podeljevanja razrešnice ter določijo sankcije za kršenje pravil iz Pogodb;
Considers that the lack of cooperation of the European Council and the Council with the discharge authority is a negative sign to the citizens of the Union.
meni, da je nepripravljenost Evropskega sveta in Sveta za sodelovanje z organom za podelitev razrešnice negativno znamenje za državljane Unije.
OJ L 246, 14.9.2016, p. 21.
UL L 246, 14.9.2016, str. 21.
OJ L 314, 1.12.2015, p. 49.
UL L 314, 1.12.2015, str. 49.
Resolution (EU) 2016/2155 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU) 2016/2155
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja ENIAC za proračunsko leto 2014
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja ENIAC za proračunsko leto 2014,
A. whereas the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (the ‘Joint Undertaking’) was set up on 20 December 2007 for a period of 10 years to establish and implement a research agenda for the development of key competences for nanoelectronics across different application areas,
A. ker je bilo Skupno podjetje ENIAC (v nadaljevanju: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno 20. decembra 2007 za obdobje desetih let z namenom opredeliti in izvesti raziskovalni program za razvoj ključnih kompetenc za nanoelektroniko na različnih področjih uporabe;
B. whereas the Joint Undertaking was granted financial autonomy in July 2010,
B. ker je skupno podjetje julija 2010 postalo finančno avtonomno;
C. whereas the founding members of the Joint Undertaking are the Union, represented by the Commission, Belgium, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Sweden and the United Kingdom, and the Association for European Nanoelectronics Activities (‘Aeneas’),
C. ker so ustanovni člani skupnega podjetja Unija, ki jo zastopajo Komisija, Belgija, Nemčija, Estonija, Irska, Grčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Nizozemska, Poljska, Portugalska, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo ter Združenje za evropske dejavnosti na področju nanoelektronike (AENEAS);
D. whereas the maximum contribution for the period of 10 years from the Union to the Joint Undertaking is EUR 450000000, to be paid from the budget of the seventh research framework programme,
D. ker je najvišji prispevek Unije za skupno podjetje v obdobju desetih let 450000000 EUR, izplača pa se iz proračuna sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave;
E. whereas Aeneas is to make a maximum contribution of EUR 30000000 to the Joint Undertaking's running costs and the Member States are to make in-kind contributions to the running costs and to provide financial contributions of at least 1,8 times the Union contribution,
E. ker naj bi prispevek združenja AENEAS znašal največ 30000000 EUR za stroške poslovanja skupnega podjetja, države članice pa morajo zagotoviti prispevke v naravi za stroške poslovanja in finančne prispevke v višini najmanj 1,8-kratnega finančnega prispevka Unije;
F. whereas the Joint Undertaking and the Artemis Joint Undertaking (‘Artemis’) were merged to create the Electronic Components and Systems for European leadership Joint Technology Initiative (‘ECSEL JTI’), which started its activities in June 2014 and will run for 10 years,
F. ker sta bili to skupno podjetje in Skupno podjetje ARTEMIS (v nadaljevanju: Artemis) združeni v skupno tehnološko pobudo Elektronske komponente in sistemi za vodilni položaj Evrope (STP ECSEL), ki je začela delovati junija 2014 in se bo izvajala deset let;
Acknowledges the fact that the Joint Undertaking's accounts for the period 1 January 2014 to 26 June 2014 present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position on 26 June 2014 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the period then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission's accounting officer;
ugotavlja, da zaključni račun skupnega podjetja za obdobje od 1. januarja 2014 do 26. junija 2014 v vseh pomembnih pogledih pošteno predstavlja njegov finančni položaj na dan 26. junija 2014 ter njegov poslovni izid in denarne tokove za tedaj končano obdobje, v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil in računovodskimi pravili, ki jih je sprejel računovodja Komisije;
Is concerned that the Court of Auditors, in its report on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the period 1 January to 26 June 2014 (the ‘Court's report’) issued a qualified opinion for the fourth consecutive year regarding the regularity and legality of the underlying transactions on the grounds that the administrative agreements signed with the national funding authorities (the ‘NFAs’) regarding audit of project cost claims do not include practical arrangements for ex post audits;
je zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče v poročilu o zaključnem računu skupnega podjetja za obdobje od 1. januarja do 26. junija 2014 (v nadaljevanju: poročilo Računskega sodišča) četrto leto zapored izdalo mnenje s pridržkom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti povezanih transakcij, saj upravni sporazumi, podpisani z nacionalnimi organi za financiranje, v zvezi z revizijami zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov za projekte ne vključujejo praktične rešitve za naknadne revizije;
Notes that, according to the Court's report, the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of the audit reports received from the NFAs concerning the costs related to completed projects; notes furthermore that, after an assessment of the audit strategies of three of the NFAs, it was not possible to conclude whether ex post audits are functioning effectively due to different methodologies used by the NFAs which did not allow the Joint Undertaking to calculate either a weighted error rate or a residual rate error; notes also that ECSEL JTI confirmed that its extensive assessment of the national assurance systems concluded that they can provide reasonable protection of the financial interests of the Joint Undertakings' members;
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje ni ocenilo kakovosti revizijskih poročil nacionalnih organov za financiranje, povezanih s stroški končanih projektov; prav tako ugotavlja, da po oceni revizijskih strategij treh nacionalnih organov za financiranje ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali so naknadne revizije učinkovite, saj nacionalni organi za financiranje uporabljajo različne metodologije, zaradi česar skupno podjetje ni moglo izračunati niti ponderirane stopnje napake niti stopnje preostale napake; ugotavlja tudi, da je STP ECSEL potrdila, da je bilo mogoče iz njene obširne ocene nacionalnih zavarovalnih sistemov razbrati, da lahko ti sistemi zagotavljajo primerno zaščito finančnih interesov članov skupnega podjetja;
Notes that the ECSEL JTI invited NFAs to produce evidence that the implementation of the national procedures provide a reasonable assurance of the legality and regularity of transactions and notes that, by the deadline of 30 June 2016, 76 % of the NFAs so invited, representing 96,79 % of the total spending of Artemis and the Joint Undertaking, submitted the documents required and confirmed that the implementation of the national procedures provides a reasonable assurance of the legality and regularity of transactions;
ugotavlja, da je STP ECSEL nacionalne organe za financiranje pozvala, naj predložijo dokaze, da izvajanje nacionalnih postopkov daje zadostno zagotovilo za zakonitost in pravilnost transakcij, in da je do 30. junija 2016, ko se je iztekel rok, 76 % pozvanih nacionalnih organov za financiranje, ki zagotavljajo 96,79 % skupne porabe Artemisa in skupnega podjetja, predložilo zahtevane dokumente in potrdilo, da nacionalni postopki dajejo zadostno zagotovilo za zakonitost in pravilnost transakcij;
Takes note of the fact that, according to the Court's report, the Joint Undertaking's final budget for the financial year 2014 included commitment appropriations of EUR 2356000 and payment appropriations of EUR 76500250;
iz poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da je končni proračun skupnega podjetja za proračunsko leto 2014 vključeval sredstva za prevzem obveznosti v višini 2356000 EUR in sredstva za plačila v višini 76500250 EUR;