natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
That assessment has demonstrated that the targets submitted by Norway, as regards NEFAB, are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target.
Za ključno področje uspešnosti glede stroškovne učinkovitosti so bili v skladu z načeli iz točke 5 v povezavi s točko 1 Priloge IV k uredbi o uspešnosti ocenjeni cilji, izraženi v ugotovljenih stroških na enoto na zračni poti, ki jih je predložila Norveška v zvezi z državami NEFAB, ob upoštevanju trenda ugotovljenih stroškov na enoto na zračni poti v drugem referenčnem obdobju ter v skupnem času prvega in drugega referenčnega obdobja (2012–2019), števila enot storitev (napovedi glede prometa) in ravni ugotovljenih stroškov na enoto na zračni poti v primerjavi z državami s podobnim delovnim in gospodarskim okoljem.
Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by Norway, as regards the NEFAB States, for en route Air Traffic Flow Management (‘ATFM’) delay has been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 4 of Annex IV to the Performance Scheme Regulation, by using the respective FAB reference values for capacity that, when applied, ensure at Union level that the Union-wide performance target is met, calculated by the Network Manager and set out in the Network Operations Plan.
Zato Nadzorni organ meni, da so cilji, vključeni v načrte izvedbe, ki jih je pripravila Norveška v zvezi z NEFAB, skladni z vseevropskimi cilji uspešnosti na vseh štirih ključnih področjih uspešnosti –
Concerning the key performance area of cost-efficiency, the targets expressed in en route determined unit costs submitted by Norway, as regards the NEFAB States, have been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 5, in conjunction with point 1, of Annex IV to the Performance Regulation, by taking account of the trend of en route determined unit costs over the second reference period and the combined period of the first and the second reference period (2012-2019), the number of service units (traffic forecast) and the level of en route determined unit costs in comparison to States having a similar operational and economic environment.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJO ODLOČBO:
Therefore, the Authority considers that the targets included in the performance plans drawn up by Norway, as regards NEFAB, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in all four key performance areas,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Cilji, ki so vključeni v načrte izvedbe, ki jih je predložila Norveška v zvezi z NEFAB v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 549/2004, navedeni v Prilogi, so skladni z vseevropskimi cilji uspešnosti za drugo referenčno obdobje iz Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/132/EU.
The targets included in the performance plans submitted by Norway, as regards NEFAB, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, listed in the Annex, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period set out in Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Norveško.
Article 2
V Bruslju, 18. marca 2015
This Decision is addressed to Norway.
Za Nadzorni organ Efte
Done at Brussels, 18 March 2015.
Predsednica
President
UL L 96, 31.3.2004, str.
OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 1.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 390/2013 z dne 3. maja 2013 o določitvi načrta izvedbe za navigacijske službe zračnega prometa in funkcije omrežja (UL L 128, 9.5.2013, str.
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU of 11 March 2014 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network and alert thresholds for the second reference period 2015-19 (OJ L 71, 12.3.2014, p.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2014/132/EU z dne 11. marca 2014 o vzpostavitvi vseevropskih ciljev uspešnosti za mrežo za upravljanje zračnega prometa in mejnih vrednosti opozarjanja za drugo referenčno obdobje 2015–2019 (UL L 71, 12.3.2014, str.
EOSM
RAT nad tlemi na državni ravni (v %)
RAT Ground STATE Level %
RAT skupaj na ravni ANSP (v %)
RAT Overall ANSP Level %
Državna raven
State level
Raven ANSP
SMI
[Finska]
Norway
[Estonija]
NEFAB
KLJUČNO PODROČJE USPEŠNOSTI GLEDE OKOLJA
[Finland]
Horizontalna učinkovitost leta na zračni poti za dejansko pot leta
[Latvia]
Cilj FAB glede okolja
[Estonia]
KLJUČNO PODROČJE USPEŠNOSTI GLEDE ZMOGLJIVOSTI
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT
Zamuda upravljanja pretoka zračnega prometa (ATFM) na zračni poti v min./let
Horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory
Cilj FAB glede preletne zmogljivosti
FAB Target Environment
KLJUČNO PODROČJE USPEŠNOSTI GLEDE STROŠKOVNE UČINKOVITOSTI
FAB Target En-Route Capacity
Postavka
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY
Enota
Legend:
Ugotovljeni stroški na zračni poti skupaj
Item
Stopnja inflacije
Units
Indeks inflacije
Total En-route Determined Costs
(v realnih cenah iz leta 2009 in nacionalni valuti)
(in nominal terms and in national currency)
Enote preletnih storitev skupaj
Inflation index
Ugotovljeni stroški na enoto na zračni poti (DUC)
(100 = 2009)
Območje zaračunavanja: Norveška – valuta: NOK
(in real 2009 prices and in national currency)
Načrt je bil nato spremenjen s popravki, nazadnje dne 14. novembra 2014.
Total En-route Services Units
Nadzorni organ je pri svoji oceni upošteval najnovejše predložene informacije.
No 110/15/COL
št. 110/15/COL
declaring incompatible the NOK 16 million additional aid from Innovation Norway to Finnfjord AS (Norway) [2016/905]
o nezdružljivosti dodatne pomoči v višini 16 milijonov NOK, ki jo je podjetje Innovation Norway dodelilo podjetju Finnfjord AS (Norveška) [2016/905]
[non-confidential version] [1]
(nezaupna različica) [1]
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), in particular to Article 61 and Protocol 26,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) ter zlasti člena 61 in Protokola 26,
Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (‘the Surveillance and Court Agreement’), in particular to Article 24,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču) in zlasti člena 24 Sporazuma,
Having regard to Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement (‘Protocol 3’), in particular to Article 7(5) of Part II,
ob upoštevanju Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol 3) in zlasti člena 7(5) dela II,
In 2011, the company Finnfjord AS (‘Finnfjord’), was granted NOK 175 million in State aid from the Energy Fund Scheme (see below) for the construction of an energy recovery system at its ferrosilicon production plant.
Podjetju Finnfjord AS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje Finnfjord) je bila leta 2011 iz sheme energetskega sklada (glej spodaj) dodeljena državna pomoč v višini 175 milijonov NOK za gradnjo sistema za energijsko predelavo v okviru njegovega obrata za proizvodnjo ferosilicija.
That award of aid was approved by the Authority by Decision No 39/11/COL [2].
Nadzorni organ je to dodelitev pomoči odobril z Odločbo št. 39/11/COL [2].
Following pre-notification discussions that were initiated in November 2012, the Norwegian authorities, by letter of 26 June 2013, notified the additional aid from Innovation Norway (‘IN’) to Finnfjord, pursuant to Article 1(3) of Part I of Protocol 3 [3].
Po razpravah pred priglasitvijo, ki so se začele novembra 2012, so norveški organi z dopisom z dne 26. junija 2013 priglasili dodatno pomoč, ki jo je podjetje Innovation Norway (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje IN) dodelilo podjetju Finnfjord, v skladu s členom 1(3) dela I Protokola 3 [3].
It is this measure that is the subject of the current decision.
Ta ukrep je obravnavan v tej odločbi.
By letter dated 5 July 2013 [4], the Authority requested additional information from the Norwegian authorities.
Nadzorni organ je v dopisu z dne 5. julija 2013 [4] od norveških organov zahteval dodatne informacije.
By letter dated 19 August 2013 [5], the Norwegian authorities responded.
Norveški organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 19. avgusta 2013 [5].
By letter dated 28 August 2013 [6], the Authority made a further request for information.
Nadzorni organ je v dopisu z dne 28. avgusta 2013 [6] znova zahteval informacije.
By letter dated 18 September 2013 [7], the Norwegian authorities responded.
Norveški organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 18. septembra 2013 [7].
By letter dated 13 November 2013 [8], the Authority informed the Norwegian authorities that it had adopted Decision No 445/13/COL initiating a formal investigation into the notified measure.
Z dopisom z dne 13. novembra 2013 [8] je Nadzorni organ obvestil norveške organe, da je sprejel Odločbo št. 445/13/COL o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave v zvezi s priglašenim ukrepom.
By e-mail dated 21 February 2014 [9], the Norwegian authorities provided their comments to the decision.
Norveški organi so v elektronskem sporočilu z dne 21. februarja 2014 [9] predložili pripombe k Odločbi.
On 10 April 2014, following prolonged discussions with the Norwegian authorities and Finnfjord concerning confidential information, the decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement [10].
Po dolgotrajnih razpravah z norveškimi organi in podjetjem Finnfjord o zaupnih informacijah je bila Odločba 10. aprila 2014 objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in Dopolnilu EGP [10].
Finnfjord was the only third party to submit comments [11].
Edina tretja stranka, ki je predložila pripombe, je bilo podjetje Finnfjord [11].
By letter dated 13 May 2014 [12], these comments were forwarded to the Norwegian authorities.
Te pripombe so bile norveškim organom posredovane z dopisom z dne 13. maja 2014 [12].
By letter dated 6 June 2014 [13], the Norwegian authorities provided comments to the third party comments.
Norveški organi so v dopisu z dne 6. junija 2014 [13] predložili pripombe k pripombam tretje stranke.
By e-mail of 25 September 2014 [14], Finnfjord provided further comments.
Podjetje Finnfjord je v dopisu z dne 25. septembra 2014 [14] predložilo nadaljnje pripombe.
By e-mail of 8 October 2014 [15], the Authority requested further information from Finnfjord.
Nadzorni organ je v elektronskem sporočilu z dne 8. oktobra 2014 [15] od podjetja Finnfjord zahteval dodatne informacije.
By emails of 24 and 27 October 2014 [16], Finnfjord responded.
Podjetje Finnfjord je odgovorilo z elektronskima sporočiloma z dne 24. in 27. oktobra 2014 [16].
By letter dated 27 October 2014 [17], the additional comments and information were forwarded to the Norwegian authorities.
Dodatne pripombe in informacije so bile norveškim organom posredovane z dopisom z dne 27. oktobra 2014 [17].
By letter dated 12 November 2014 [18], the Norwegian authorities responded.
Norveški organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 12. novembra 2014 [18].
Between November 2014 and January 2015, the Authority had informal contacts by e-mail and telephone with the Norwegian authorities and Finnfjord.
Nadzorni organ je bil med novembrom 2014 in januarjem 2015 prek elektronskih sporočil in telefona neuradno v stikih z norveškimi organi in podjetjem Finnfjord.
The notified measure — the NOK 16 million grant
Priglašeni ukrep – 16 milijonov NOK nepovratnih sredstev
The notified proposed measure is a direct grant of NOK 16 million from IN to Finnfjord.
Priglašeni predlagani ukrep so neposredna nepovratna sredstva v višini 16 milijonov NOK, ki jih podjetje IN dodeli podjetju Finnfjord.
It is intended to partly cover the increase in the project's costs from NOK [680-720] million to NOK [approximately 800] million.
Ta sredstva so namenjena delnemu kritju zvišanja stroškov projekta z [680–720] milijonov NOK na [približno 800] milijonov NOK.
IN informed Finnfjord of its decision to grant the notified measure by letter dated 10 December 2012.
Podjetje IN je z dopisom z dne 10. decembra 2012 podjetju Finnfjord sporočilo svojo odločitev o odobritvi priglašenega ukrepa.
Loans from IN and SNN
Posojila podjetja IN in banke SNN
IN has explained that Finnfjord needed an additional NOK [80-95] million to complete the energy recovery project.
Podjetje IN je pojasnilo, da podjetje Finnfjord za dokončanje projekta energijske predelave potrebuje dodatnih [80–95] milijonov NOK.
The NOK 16 million therefore only covered part of the cost increases.
S 16 milijoni NOK se je torej kril le del zvišanja stroškov.
At the same time as it provided the NOK 16 million direct grant to Finnfjord, IN also provided Finnfjord with a loan of NOK 18 million.
Podjetje IN je podjetju Finnfjord skupaj z dodelitvijo neposrednih nepovratnih sredstev v višini 16 milijonov NOK odobrilo tudi posojilo v višini 18 milijonov NOK.
At the time, Finnfjord had already borrowed NOK 100 million from IN in connection with the same project.
Podjetje Finnfjord si je v zvezi z istim projektom že prej od podjetja IN izposodilo 100 milijonov NOK.
None of the loans have been notified to the Authority.
Nadzornemu organu ni bilo priglašeno nobeno posojilo.
IN holds that they have been granted on market terms and therefore do not involve State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.
Podjetje IN trdi, da sta bili posojili odobreni pod tržnimi pogoji in zato ne vključujeta državne pomoči v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP.
In parallel with the NOK 18 million loan from IN, Finnfjord secured a loan of NOK [45-60] million from the financial institution SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge (‘SNN’).
Vzporedno s posojilom podjetja IN v višini 18 milijonov NOK je podjetje Finnfjord od finančne institucije SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka SNN) pridobilo posojilo v višini [45–60] milijonov NOK.
Finnfjord's existing loans from SNN in connection with the project totalled NOK [300-325] million.
Obstoječa posojila v zvezi s projektom, ki jih je podjetju Finnfjord odobrila banka SNN, so skupaj znašala [300–325] milijonov NOK.
In sum the NOK 16 million direct grant, and the two loans of NOK 18 million and NOK [45-60] million covered the NOK [80-95] million cost increase.
Z neposrednimi nepovratnimi sredstvi v višini 16 milijonov NOK ter posojili v višini 18 milijonov NOK in [45–60] milijonov NOK se je skupaj krilo zvišanje stroškov za [80–95] milijonov NOK.
Innovation Norway (‘IN’)
Innovation Norway (IN)
IN is a public entity established by the Act on Innovation Norway [19].
Podjetje IN je javni subjekt, ki je bil ustanovljen z Zakonom o podjetju Innovation Norway [19].
It is owned by the Norwegian State through the Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development (51 %) and by all of the 19 Norwegian County Authorities (49 %).
Podjetje je prek ministrstva za lokalno upravo in regionalni razvoj v lasti Norveške (51 %) in vseh 19 norveških okrajnih organov (49 %).
IN is financed by public resources.
Financira se z javnimi sredstvi.
Enova SF (‘Enova’)
Enova SF (Enova)
Enova SF (‘Enova’) is a state enterprise [20] wholly owned by the Norwegian State through the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.
Enova SF (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje Enova) je državno podjetje [20], ki je prek ministrstva za nafto in energijo v celoti v lasti Norveške.
It is responsible for managing the Energy Fund Scheme, a State aid scheme for the promotion of environmental protection approved by the Authority by Decisions No 125/06/COL [21] and No 248/11/COL [22].
Odgovorno je za upravljanje sheme energetskega sklada, tj. sheme državne pomoči za spodbujanje varstva okolja, ki jo je Nadzorni organ odobril z odločbama št. 125/06/COL [21] in št. 248/11/COL [22].
Enova is financed by public resources.
Podjetje Enova se financira z javnimi sredstvi.
Under the Energy Fund Scheme, Enova arranges competitions for aid where the winning projects are the ones with the best energy result per NOK of aid [23].
Podjetje Enova v okviru sheme energetskega sklada organizira razpise za pomoč, pri katerih so izbrani projekti z najboljšimi energetskimi rezultati glede na dodeljeno pomoč v NOK [23].
Finalisation of the energy recovery project and disbursement of the last tranche of aid from Enova
Dokončanje projekta energijske predelave in izplačilo zadnje tranše pomoči podjetja Enova
Enova only disperses the last 20 % of an individual aid measure when it has approved a final project report [24].
Podjetje Enova zadnjih 20 % ukrepa individualne pomoči izplača šele po odobritvi končnega poročila o projektu [24].
On 22 November 2012, the final report from Finnfjord was approved by Enova.
Prejemnik – Finnfjord AS (Finnfjord)
On 23 November 2012, Enova disbursed the last NOK 35 million of aid (20 % of the total aid amount of NOK 175 million).
Finnfjord je družba z omejeno odgovornostjo v družinski lasti.
The recipient — Finnfjord AS (‘Finnfjord’)
Obrat, ki se financira s predlagano pomočjo, se nahaja v mestu Finnsnes v okraju Troms, ki je drugi najsevernejši okraj Norveške.
Finnfjord is a family-owned limited liability company.
Zvišanje stroškov
The plant supported by the proposed aid is located in Finnsnes in the County of Troms, the second northernmost county in Norway.
V priglasitvi, na podlagi katere je Nadzorni organ sprejel Odločbo št. 39/11/COL z dne 9. februarja 2011 o odobritvi pomoči podjetja Enova za podjetje Finnfjord v višini 175 milijonov NOK, je bil proračun projekta energijske predelave podjetja Finnfjord ocenjen na 511,66 milijona NOK.
Cost increases
Pomoč je bila dodeljena za zamenjavo obstoječega hladilnega sistema z enoto za energijsko predelavo.
In the notification leading to the Authority's Decision No 39/11/COL of 9 February 2011 approving NOK 175 million in aid from Enova to Finnfjord, the budget for Finnfjord's energy recovery project was estimated at NOK 511,66 million.
Namen je bil zagotoviti letno proizvodnjo električne energije v višini 224 GWh in rekuperacijo procesne pare v višini 125 GWh.
The aid was awarded for the replacement of the existing cooling system with an energy recovery unit.
Ocenjena letna proizvodnja energije je torej znašala 349 GWh.
The intention was to annually generate 224 GWh of electrical power and recover 125 GWh of process steam.
Glede na trenutno priglasitev se je predvideni proračun do februarja 2011 že povečal za 190 milijonov NOK, in sicer s 511,66 milijona NOK na 700 milijonov NOK.
The estimated annual energy production thus amounted to 349 GWh.
Kljub temu znatnemu povečanju se je upravni odbor podjetja Finnfjord 7. februarja 2011 odločil za izvedbo projekta.
According to the current notification, by February 2011, the estimated budget had already increased by NOK 190 million from NOK 511,66 million to NOK 700 million.
Podjetje Finnfjord takrat ni zaprosilo za več pomoči.
Despite this substantial increase, on 7 February 2011 Finnfjord's board decided to go ahead with the project.
Priglašena pomoč ni namenjena kritju zvišanja stroškov, zaradi katerega je bil proračun ocenjen na 700 milijonov NOK.
Finnfjord did not at that time apply for more aid.
Razlog za zvišanje stroškov je bila predvsem odločitev podjetja Finnfjord, da bo projekt osredotočilo izrecno na proizvodnjo električne energije iz pare (in ne rekuperacijo procesne pare), tako da bo kupilo zmogljivejšo parno turbino.
The notified aid is not intended to cover the cost increases that led to the NOK 700 million estimate.
Podjetje Finnfjord je z dopisom z dne 16. februarja 2011 obvestilo podjetje Enova, da je naročilo zmogljivejšo turbino, ki bo zagotovila letno proizvodnjo električne energije v višini 344,5 GWh.
The turbine was ordered on 7 January 2011.
Na podlagi tega je podjetje Finnfjord zahtevalo, da se proizvodnja pare izključi iz projekta, za katerega je prejelo pomoč.
A legally binding contract for the turbine was concluded on 23 February 2011.
Podjetje Enova je z dopisom z dne 17. februarja 2011 odobrilo spremembo projekta.
By letter dated 16 February 2011, Finnfjord informed Enova that it had ordered the more powerful turbine which would yield an annual production of 344,5 GWh of electrical energy.
Podjetje Finnfjord je podjetju Enova med celotnim trajanjem projekta zagotavljalo poročila o napredku.
This higher electrical energy production was thus close to the estimated total production of 349 GWh of electricity and steam.
V poročilu z dne 30. aprila 2012 je podjetje Finnfjord navedlo nadaljnje zvišanje stroškov v zvezi s stavbo turbine, parnimi in kondenzacijskimi cevmi ter jarki.
On that basis, Finnfjord requested the exclusion of the steam production from the aided project.
Dodatni stroški so znašali približno 5 milijonov NOK.
By letter dated 17 February 2011, Enova approved the change to the project.
Podjetje Finnfjord si je še vedno prizadevalo, da skupni stroški projekta ne bi presegli predvidenih 700 milijonov NOK.
Throughout the project phase, Finnfjord supplied Enova with progress reports.
V poročilu o napredku z dne 29. junija 2012 so bili skupni stroški še vedno ocenjeni na 700 milijonov NOK.
In its report dated 30 April 2012, Finnfjord referred to further cost increases related to the turbine building, steam and condensation pipes, and ditches.
Vendar je bilo do takrat predvideno, da se bodo stroški projekta zvišali za dodatnih [5–10] milijonov NOK.
The additional costs amounted to approximately NOK 5 million.
Norveški organi so pojasnili, da je podjetje Finnfjord spomladi 2012 začelo neuradne razprave s podjetjem Enova o pridobitvi dodatne pomoči za kritje zvišanih stroškov projekta.
Finnfjord still aimed at keeping the total project costs below the NOK 700 million estimate.
Po neuradnih stikih je podjetje Finnfjord 5. julija 2012 uradno zaprosilo podjetje Enova za dodatno pomoč.
However, by that time, it was estimated that the project would incur an additional NOK [5-10] million in increased costs.
Glede na informacije, predložene Nadzornemu organu, je podjetje Finnfjord na podlagi proračunskega pregleda, dokončanega 31. julija 2012, sklenilo, da bodo v okviru projekta nastali dodatni stroški, pri čemer je predvidelo, da bodo zvišani skupni stroški znašali med [740] milijonov NOK in [približno 800] milijonov NOK.
This cost increase was discussed by Finnfjord's board in a meeting on 19 June 2012.
Zvišanje stroškov je bilo povezano z: adaptacijami obstoječih strojev, adaptacijami treh obstoječih peči, adaptacijami kanalov za dim, napravami v stavbi turbine in drugih stavbah, daljšimi izpadi proizvodnje od pričakovanih ter dokončanjem dela in naprav.
The Norwegian authorities have not explained why the total cost increase of NOK [10-15] million ([…]) did not lead to an adjustment of the total cost estimate of NOK 700 million in the progress report of 29 June 2012.
Podjetje Finnfjord je podjetje Enova zaprosilo za dodatno pomoč, da bi lahko projekt izpolnil svoje notranje zahteve glede dobičkonosnosti.
The Norwegian authorities have explained that Finnfjord, at one point during the spring of 2012 entered into informal discussions with Enova about obtaining additional aid to cover the increased project costs.
Razloge za zvišanje stroškov je podrobneje pojasnilo v svojem poročilu o napredku z dne 12. septembra 2012.
On 5 July 2012, following the informal contacts, Finnfjord formally applied for additional aid from Enova.
V začetku avgusta 2012 je podjetje Finnfjord s podjetjem Enova neuradno razpravljalo o morebitni odložitvi del v zvezi s tretjo pečjo in razvrstitvi te peči kot ločenega projekta, da bi za ta nov projekt zaprosilo podjetje Enova za več pomoči.
At that time, Finnfjord had revised its total cost estimate to NOK [730-760] million.
Podjetje Enova je z dopisom z dne 20. avgusta 2012 zavrnilo vlogo za pomoč.
The information provided to the Authority indicates that Finnfjord, on the basis of a budget review finalised on 31 July 2012, had concluded that the project would incur additional costs and the total cost estimate was increased to between NOK [740] million and NOK [approximately 800] million.
Na seji upravnega odbora podjetja Finnfjord dne 25. septembra 2012 so bili skupni stroški ocenjeni na [približno 800] milijonov NOK.
The cost increases related to: adaptations of existing machinery, adaptations of three existing furnaces, adaptations of smoke ducts, installations in the turbine building and other buildings, longer production shortfalls than expected, and finalisation of the work and the installations.
Na tej seji je upravni odbor podjetja Finnfjord obravnaval tri različne vrste ukrepov: