natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes that the carry-over of committed appropriations was relatively high for title II (administrative expenditure) at EUR 1700000 (38 %); acknowledges that this was partly due to events beyond the Authority’s control, such as the relocation of its seat to Prague in September 2012 (EUR 400000) and the setting-up of the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre (EUR 400000) which necessitated the provision of certain goods and services in the last quarter of the year; notes, moreover, that several contracts relating to IT and legal services included in the 2013 work programme were signed in December 2012;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so letni računovodski izkazi skupnega podjetja prejeli pozitivno mnenje Računskega sodišča o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, na katere se nanašajo ti računovodski izkazi, potem ko so leta 2011 v zvezi s tem prejeli mnenje s pridržki, in poziva skupno podjetje, naj nadaljuje svoja prizadevanja za zagotovitev dobrega finančnega poslovodenja;
Notes that an amount of EUR 700000 was transferred from title I (staff expenditure) to title II in November 2012;
ugotavlja, da je končni spremenjeni proračun skupnega podjetja za proračunsko leto 2012 vključeval sredstva za prevzem obveznosti v višini 205,4 milijona EUR in sredstva za plačila v višini 167,9 milijona EUR;
Notes with concern that the Court of Auditors identified weaknesses in the recruitment procedures audited which affected transparency and equal treatment, namely the fact that no threshold scores were determined for admission to written tests and interviews or for inclusion in the list of suitable candidates and the fact that the vacancy notices made no provision for appeals by rejected candidates;
na podlagi letnih računovodskih izkazov skupnega podjetja ugotavlja, da je bila celotna stopnja uporabe sredstev za prevzem obveznosti 84-odstotna, stopnja uporabe sredstev za plačila pa samo 75-odstotna; ugotavlja tudi, da je stopnja izvrševanja za odhodke iz poslovanja v okviru tega znašala 97 % za sredstva za prevzem obveznosti in 84 % za sredstva za plačila; kljub izboljšavam glede na leto 2011 ostaja zaskrbljen, ker to kaže na precejšnje zamude, ki so v primerjavi s prvotnim načrtom nastale pri izvajanju dejavnosti; zahteva, da si skupno podjetje še naprej prizadeva za izboljšanje svojih potekov dela in postopkov za skrajšanje obdobja od objave razpisov za oddajo predlogov do podpisa sporazumov o nepovratnih sredstvih;
Notes that the Court, in its annual audit report for 2012, made no comments as regards the Agency’s procurement procedures;
je zaskrbljen zaradi ponavljajoče se nizke stopnje izvrševanja proračuna skupnega podjetja in obžaluje stanje denarnih sredstev v višini 25,7 milijona EUR, kar je na koncu leta predstavljalo 15 % razpoložljivih sredstev za plačila; ugotavlja, da je to v nasprotju z načelom proračunskega ravnotežja; opozarja skupno podjetje, da je treba izvesti konkretne ukrepe za uravnoteženje proračuna;
Regrets that the Agency did not answer questionnaire on the management and prevention of conflicts of interests; urges the Agency to report to the discharge authority on the actions it has implemented to become in line with the Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 15/2012 and Parliament’s recommendations that all agencies develop and implement comprehensive independence policies and procedures, inter alia, by establishing a breach of trust mechanism and clear penalties, or by changing those already in place;
pozdravlja ugotovitev Računskega sodišča, da je skupno podjetje leta 2012 še dodatno izboljšalo svoje postopke upravljanja ter upravne, finančne in računovodske postopke; ugotavlja, da so obstajale določene omejitve v zvezi s popolnostjo podatkov o poslovanju, s katerimi je podjetje upravljalo, vendar pa je uvedlo „orodje GMT“, posebno aplikacijo za upravljanje finančnih podatkov, ki se nanašajo na izvajanje sporazumov o nepovratnih sredstvih z njegovimi člani;
Observes that the CVs and declarations of interests of the members of the Administrative Board, as well as the declarations of interests of the Executive Director and senior management are not publicly available; calls on the Agency to remedy the situation as a matter of urgency;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker je skupno podjetje sprostilo plačila, čeprav je bilo ugotovljeno, da revizijska potrdila, priložena zahtevkom za povračilo stroškov, dveh upravičencev vsebujejo pridržke glede pogodb osebja, zaposlenega pri projektu, in da revizijsko potrdilo za enega od njiju vsebuje tudi pridržke glede uporabljenih stopenj posrednih stroškov; ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje sprejelo nadaljnje ukrepe v zvezi z obema primeroma in neupravičeni stroški nazadnje niso bili izplačani; zato poziva skupno podjetje, naj pred potrjevanjem zahtevkov za povračilo osnovnih stroškov in samim povračilom ustrezno upošteva izjeme, zajete v revizijskih potrdilih;
Acknowledges from the Agency that in 2012, the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS) carried out a risk assessment and a follow-up engagement in accordance with the Strategic Audit Plan of the Agency; notes that there were no open critical or very important recommendations stemming from the previous IAS audit reports; notes, however, that in the course of the risk analysis, the IAS identified certain processes of high inherent risk which could not be considered as auditable within the audit plan as the controls were assessed as absent or insufficient; notes that the Agency’s management submitted an action plan aimed at addressing those weaknesses adequately;
kljub v splošnem pozitivnim zaključkom ugotavlja, da so bile v zvezi s predhodno kontrolo zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov, ki so jih predložili partnerji Čistega neba, ugotovljene naslednje, deloma specifične šibke točke:
OJ C 365, 13.12.2013, p.
kontrolni seznami, ki se uporabljajo za predhodno kontrolo zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov, niso bili vedno popolni,
261.
uradniki za preverjanje niso pripravili poročil o tehničnem sprejetju za dejavnosti partnerjev,
OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p.
v enem primeru je naloge finančnega preverjanja in odobritev opravil vodja uprave, kar je v nasprotju z določbami priročnika o finančnih postopkih in načelom ločitve nalog,
11.
partnerji skupnega podjetja zahtevke za povračilo stroškov na splošno posredujejo z zamudo in tudi v času revizije najmanj 70 od 292 zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov skupnemu podjetju ni bilo predloženih pravočasno, pri čemer je bila zamuda v 15 primerih daljša od enega leta;
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2012
je seznanjen s tem, da je leta 2012 služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo revidirala proces letnega načrtovanja za upravljanje nepovratnih sredstev; pozdravlja ugotovitev revizije, da je obstoječi sistem notranje kontrole dal zadostno zagotovilo v zvezi z doseganjem poslovnih ciljev, ki so bili določeni za ta proces, vendar ugotavlja, da je revizor izrekel dve zelo pomembni priporočili v zvezi z zamudami pri izvajanju programa in sistemom za ocenjevanje uporabe virov; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organ, pristojen za podelitev razrešnice, obvesti o ravni izvajanja programa in o doseženih rezultatih;
having regard to the final annual accounts of the Artemis for the financial year 2012,
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je bil po presoji Računskega sodišča dosežen velik napredek v zvezi z vidiki IT načrta neprekinjenega poslovanja in načrta ponovne vzpostavitve poslovanja skupnega podjetja; vseeno poudarja, da formalizacija teh politik in postopkov še ni končana, in poziva skupno podjetje, naj to nemudoma uredi;
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the Artemis for the financial year 2012, together with the Joint Undertaking’s replies [1],having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 (05851/2014 – C7-0053/2014),
obžaluje, da življenjepisi članov upravnega odbora in izvršnega direktorja niso objavljeni; poziva skupno podjetje, naj to nepravilnost nemudoma odpravi; poziva skupno podjetje, naj oblikuje in sprejme celovito politiko preprečevanja in obvladovanja navzkrižja interesov;
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2], and in particular Article 185 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 74/2008 of 20 December 2007 on the establishment of the ‘Artemis Joint Undertaking’ to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems [4], and in particular Article 11(4) thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
meni, da je visoka raven preglednosti osrednji element pri zmanjševanju tveganja navzkrižja interesov; zato poziva skupno podjetje, naj svojo politiko in/ali ureditev za preprečevanje in obvladovanje navzkrižja interesov ter izvedbena pravila, pa tudi seznam in življenjepise članov upravnega odbora, objavi na svojem spletnem mestu;
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0203/2014),
ugotavlja, da je revizija zajela tudi vzpostavitev skupnih tehnoloških pobud;
A. whereas the Artemis Joint Undertaking (‘the Joint Undertaking’) was set up in December 2007 for a period of 10 years to define and implement a ‘Research Agenda’ for the development of key technologies for embedded computing systems across different application areas in order to strengthen European competitiveness and sustainability, and allow the emergence of new markets and societal applications,
se strinja s sklepom Računskega sodišča, da so bile skupne tehnološke pobude vzpostavljene, da bi podpirale dolgoročne industrijske naložbe na določenih raziskovalnih področjih; vendar ugotavlja, da sta bili v povprečju potrebni dve leti, da je posamezna skupna tehnološka pobuda postala finančno samostojna, ob tem pa je Komisija odgovorna za tretjino pričakovane dobe delovanja skupnih tehnoloških pobud;
B. whereas the Joint Undertaking started to work autonomously in October 2009,
poleg tega ugotavlja, da so bile nekatere skupne tehnološke pobude po mnenju Računskega sodišča še posebno uspešne pri vključevanju malih in srednjih podjetij (MSP) v svoje projekte in da je bilo skoraj 21 % sredstev, zagotovljenih iz skupnih tehnoloških pobud, namenjenih MSP;
C. whereas the maximum contribution for the period of 10 years from the Union to the Joint Undertaking is EUR is EUR 420000000 to be paid from the budget of the Seventh Research Framework Programme,
ugotavlja, da so skupni predvideni v proračunu načrtovani prihodki skupnih podjetij za leto 2012 znašali približno 2,5 milijarde EUR ali približno 1,8 % splošnega proračuna Unije za proračunsko leto 2012, pri čemer je bilo približno 618 milijonov EUR iz splošnega proračuna (denarni prispevek Evropske komisije), približno 134 milijonov EUR pa so prispevali industrijski partnerji in člani skupnih podjetij;
Budgetary and Financial Management
ugotavlja, da skupna podjetja zaposlujejo 409 uslužbencev za nedoločen in določen čas ali manj kot 1 % vseh uradnikov Unije, potrjenih v splošnem proračunu Unije (kadrovski načrt);
Notes that the Court of Auditors stated that the 2012 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Rules;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj ob upoštevanju velikih zneskov, ki so vključeni, in tveganj, še zlasti za ugled, celovito analizira skupne tehnološke pobude in druga skupna podjetja v ločenem poročilu; želi spomniti, da je Evropski parlament pred tem zahteval, da Računsko sodišče pripravi posebno poročilo o zmožnosti skupnih podjetij, da v povezavi s svojimi zasebnimi partnerji zagotovijo dodano vrednost in učinkovito izvajanje raziskovalnih, razvojno-tehnoloških in demonstracijskih programov Unije; opozarja, da bi skupna podjetja morala zagotoviti financiranje za dolgoročne industrijske naložbe in spodbujati zasebne naložbe v raziskave.
Is concerned that for the second year in a row, the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts on the grounds that the Joint Undertaking was not in a position to assess whether the ex post audit strategy provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions;
UL C 369, 17.12.2013, str.
Notes that the Court of Auditors considers that the information available on the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s ex post audit strategy is not sufficient for the Court to conclude whether this key control tool is functioning effectively; reiterates its call for the Court of Auditors, through its independent audits, to provide the discharge authority with its own opinion on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking;
10.
Recalls that the Joint Undertaking adopted an ex post audit strategy in 2010 and that its implementation started in 2011; notes that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) of the Member States, but that the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for ex post audits;
UL L 30, 4.2.2008, str.
Points out that, according to the audit report by the Court of Auditors, payments made in 2012 relating to certificates of acceptance of costs issued by the Member States’ NFAs amounted to EUR 7,3 million, which represents 43 % of total operational payments; is concerned that, according to that Court of Auditors’ report, the Joint Undertaking received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 45 % of the costs relating to completed projects, that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of those audits, that, by the end of April 2013, the Joint Undertaking had not received information on the audit strategies of all NFAs, and that the Joint Undertaking was therefore not in a position to assess whether ex post audits provide sufficient assurance as to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions;
1.
Calls on the Joint Undertaking to submit a report to Parliament on the negative aspects recorded by the Court of Auditors; calls for that report to be submitted to Parliament together with an assessment by the Court of Auditors;
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja ENIAC za proračunsko leto 2012
Reiterates that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante and ex post controls; requests that the discharge authority is informed of the results of the following ex post audit processes; notes, moreover, that the Joint Undertaking is engaged in an ongoing process to address these issues together with the Court of Auditors, and anticipates a positive outcome in future years;
ob upoštevanju letnih računovodskih izkazov Skupnega podjetja ENIAC za proračunsko leto 2012,
Notes that the Joint Undertaking’s initial budget included operational commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 55,1 million and that at the end of the year, the Governing Board decided to reduce the operational appropriations budget to EUR 39,5 million; regrets the fact, nevertheless, that the utilisation rate for operational payment appropriations only reached the level of 62 %; notes that this is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium; reminds the Joint Undertaking of the need to implement concrete measures to attain budget equilibrium, consistent with the relevant operational procedures of the participating Member States;
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Skupnega podjetja ENIAC za proračunsko leto 2012 z odgovori skupnega podjetja [1],ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta z dne 18. februarja 2014 (05851/2014 – C7-0053/2014),
Is concerned about the low implementation rate of the budget and, moreover, about the underlying activities of the Joint Undertaking; emphasises that the deposits in bank accounts at the end of 2012 totalled EUR 17230100, representing 57 % of the authorised payment appropriations (EUR 30132752);
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2], zlasti člena 185 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [3], zlasti člena 208 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 72/2008 z dne 20. decembra 2007 o ustanovitvi Skupnega podjetja ENIAC [4], zlasti člena 11(4) Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5],ob upoštevanju Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1271/2013 z dne 30. septembra 2013 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 208 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], zlasti člena 108 Delegirane uredbe,ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih sklepov in resolucij o razrešnici,
Ascertains from the Court of Auditors’ report that although the Council Regulation setting up the Joint Undertaking envisaged a maximum total budget of EUR 410 million to cover operational expenditure, the actual implementation rate and the anticipated value of calls for proposals together represent EUR 206 million, or only 50,2 % of the total budget; notes that this indicates a low budget implementation rate, mainly due to a complex financial process for the closure of the projects; takes note that the budget implementation rate is linked in full complementary to the national commitments of Member States;
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A7-0204/2014),
Internal control systems
A. ker je bilo Skupno podjetje ENIAC (v nadaljevanju: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno 20. decembra 2007 za obdobje desetih let z namenom opredeliti in izvesti raziskovalni program za razvoj ključnih kompetenc za nanoelektroniko na različnih področjih uporabe;
Takes note that the Court of Auditors considers that the Joint Undertaking intensified its efforts to establish and implement effective financial, accounting and management control procedures in 2012; points out that further work is needed, in particular regarding financial verification of cost claims and the internal control standards;
B. ker je skupno podjetje julija 2010 postalo finančno avtonomno;
Takes due note that the Executive Director’s 2012 declaration of assurance expresses a reservation concerning the ex post audit strategy but the information included in the reservation is not sufficient as regards its implementation; calls on the Joint Undertaking to obtain the assurance needed provided by the national authorities’ certificates and the ex post audit strategy;
C. ker najvišji prispevek Unije k skupnemu podjetju za obdobje desetih let znaša 450000000 EUR, izplača pa se iz proračuna sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave;
Regrets that the CVs of the members of the Management Board and the Executive Director are not publicly available; calls on the Joint Undertaking to remedy the situation as a matter of urgency; urges the Joint Undertaking, in the framework of the future ECSEL Joint Undertaking, to develop and adopt a comprehensive policy on the prevention and management of conflicts of interests;
Upravljanje proračuna in finančno poslovodenje
Believes that a high level of transparency is a key element in order to mitigate the risks of conflicts of interests; calls, therefore, on the Joint Undertaking to make its policy and/or arrangements on the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and its implementing rules, as well as the list of the members of the management boards and CVs available on its website;
ugotavlja, da po mnenju Računskega sodišča letni računovodski izkazi skupnega podjetja za leto 2012 v vseh pomembnih vidikih ustrezno prikazujejo njegovo finančno stanje na dan 31. decembra 2012 ter rezultate njegovega poslovanja in denarne tokove za leto, ki se je takrat končalo, v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil;
Invites the Court of Auditors to monitor the Joint Undertaking’s policies as regards the management and prevention of conflicts of interests by drafting a Special Report on the matter by the next discharge procedure;
je zaskrbljen, ker je skupno podjetje od Računskega sodišča že drugo leto zapored prejelo mnenje s pridržkom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, povezanih z letnimi računovodskimi izkazi, saj skupno podjetje ni moglo oceniti, ali strategija naknadnih revizij, ki je pri revidiranju zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov za projekte zelo odvisna od nacionalnih organov financiranja, dovolj zanesljivo zagotavlja zakonitost in pravilnost povezanih transakcij;
Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership (ECSEL) Joint Undertaking
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče meni, da informacije, ki so bile na voljo o izvajanju strategije naknadnih revizij skupnega podjetja, ne zadoščajo za sklep Računskega sodišča o tem, ali ta ključna kontrola uspešno deluje; ponovno poziva Računsko sodišče, naj prek svojih neodvisnih revizij zagotovi organu, pristojnemu za podelitev razrešnice, svoje mnenje o zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslov, povezanih z letnimi računovodskimi izkazi skupnega podjetja;
Recalls that the Artemis and ENIAC Joint Undertakings were set up in December 2007, under the Seventh Framework Programme for a period of 10 years for the development of key competences for nanoelectronics and for the development of key technologies for embedded computing systems, respectively; notes that Artemis started to work autonomously in October 2009 and ENIAC was granted its financial autonomy in July 2010;
opozarja, da je skupno podjetje leta 2010 sprejelo strategijo naknadnih revizij in da se je slednja začela izvajati leta 2011; ugotavlja, da so za revizijo zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov projekta pooblaščeni nacionalni organi za financiranje držav članic; ugotavlja, da se strategija naknadnih revizij skupnega podjetja, kar zadeva revidiranje zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov projektov, zanaša na nacionalne organe financiranja;
Recalls the continued worries of the discharge authority concerning the low implementation rates of their budget and, moreover, the underlying activities of the Joint Undertakings associated with high cash balances; recalls that they sought to increase and leverage private and public investments in research and innovation in two complementary domains of high importance for the industrial fabric in Europe;
poziva Skupno podjetje ENIAC, naj za Evropski parlament pripravi poročilo o negativnih elementih, ki jih je ugotovilo Računsko sodišče; poziva, da se poročilo skupaj z oceno Računskega sodišča posreduje Parlamentu;