natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case of divergent assessments by different rating agencies the relevant rating for the calculation of the fee increase should be the higher rating.
Če bodo različne bonitetne agencije različno ocenile banko, se bo za izračun povišanja provizije uporabila višja ocena.
The material time for the rating in the determination of the guarantee fee is the day on which the guarantee is granted in relation to a specific bond issuance by the beneficiary.
Bonitetna ocena za določitev višine provizije za jamstvo je dan, na katerega se dodeli jamstvo v zvezi s specifično obveznico, ki jo izda upravičenec.
E.g. an update of the CDS reference period stipulated in the ECB recommendations of October 2008 that demonstrably leads to an increase of at least 20 bp for banks rated A+ and A, 30 bp for banks rated A- and 40 bp for banks rated below A-.
Npr. posodobitev referenčnega obdobja za posel kreditne zamenjave, ki ga je ECB določila v priporočilih iz oktobra 2008, ki dokazljivo pomeni povišanje za vsaj 20 bazičnih točk za banke z bonitetno oceno A + in A, 30 bazičnih točk za banke z bonitetno oceno A– in 40 bazičnih točk za banke z bonitetno oceno pod A–.
The assessment will be carried out when an EFTA State receives the application for an approval of guarantees for the issuance of new or renewed debt as from 1 January 2011 and will include the amount of debt to be covered by the requested guarantees as well as all existing outstanding guaranteed liabilities in relation to total liabilities/balance sheet at the material time.
Država Efte bo oceno opravila, ko bo prejela vlogo za odobritev jamstev za izdajo novih ali obnovljenih dolžniških certifikatov od 1. januarja 2011 naprej, in bo v oceno vključila znesek dolga, ki ga je treba pokriti z zahtevanimi jamstvi, in vse obstoječe neporavnane zajamčene obveznosti kot delež skupnih obveznosti/skupne bilance stanja na določeni dan.
Outstanding liabilities that exceed the threshold due to issuances before 1 January 2011 do not trigger a viability review unless the bank resorts to the issuance of new debt keeping the guaranteed liabilities above the threshold.
Neporavnane obveznosti, ki zaradi dolžniških certifikatov, izdanih pred 1. januarjem 2011, presegajo prag, ne sprožijo zahteve po pregledu uspešnosti poslovanja, razen če banka izda nove dolžniške certifikate, s čimer znesek zajamčenih obveznosti ostane nad pragom.
For example, where a bank is already undergoing a viability review because of a recapitalisation and the threshold for guarantees is exceeded, the review has to the extended to address the reasons why the bank continues to rely on state guarantees, to include a liquidity test, and to analyse if and to what extent further use of state guarantee is foreseen.
Na primer, če se v zvezi z banko že izvaja pregled uspešnosti poslovanja zaradi dokapitalizacije in je prag za jamstva presežen, je treba v okviru pregleda obravnavati tudi razloge za stalno zanašanje banke na jamstva, vanj vključiti test likvidnosti in po potrebi proučiti, v kolikšni meri se načrtuje nadaljnja uporaba državnih jamstev.
Restructuring Guidelines, point 8 and section 2, also pointing to the related sections in point 40 of the Recapitalisation Guidelines and Annex V to the Impaired Assets Guidelines.
Točka 8 oddelka 2 smernic o prestrukturiranju in s tem povezani deli točke 40 smernic o dokapitalizaciji ter Priloga V smernic o oslabljenih sredstvih.
Including, for example, a higher ratio of guaranteed debts that is explained by a particular effort to sustain or increase lending to the real economy in the public interest and with the backing of the EFTA State concerned provided that such conduct is compatible with the common market.
Kar na primer vključuje višji delež zajamčenega dolga, ki se ga da razložiti s posebnimi prizadevanji za ohranitev ali povečanje posojil realnemu gospodarstvu v javno korist in s podporo zadevni državi Efte, če je tako ravnanje združljivo s skupnim trgom.
Having due regard to the macro-economic situation of the EFTA State in general and in particular to those elements such as the sovereign risk that have a direct bearing on the terms of access to funding for banks located in the EFTA State.
Ob ustreznem upoštevanju splošnih makroekonomskih razmer v državi Efte in zlasti elementov, kot so tveganja državnih posojilojemalcev, ki imajo neposreden vpliv na pogoje dostopa do financiranja za banke s sedežem v državi Efte.
As expressed in the beneficiary’s rating or CDS spread.
Kot je navedena v bonitetni oceni ali razponu poslov kreditne zamenjave upravičenke.
In order to increase capital buffers, banks have decided to sell non-strategic assets such as industrial participations, or to focus on specific geographical sectors.
Da bi povečale kapitalske rezerve, so se banke odločile prodati nestrateško premoženje, na primer panožno udeležbo, ali pa so se osredotočile na posebne geografske sektorje.
See on this point European Central Bank, ‘EU Banking Sector Stability, September 2010’.
V zvezi s tem glej Evropska centralna banka, EU Banking Sector Stability, september 2010.
According to the European Central Bank, banks’ overall solvency ratio increased substantially in the course of 2009 in all EU Member States.
V skladu z Evropsko centralno banko se je splošna raven solventnosti bank v letu 2009 precej povečala v vseh državah članicah EU.
In addition, information for a sample of large banks in the European Union suggests that the improvement in capital ratios continued into the first half of 2010, supported by an increase in retained earnings as well as by further private capital raising and public capital injections for some banks.
Poleg tega je iz podatkov o nekaterih večjih bankah v Evropski uniji mogoče sklepati, da so se kapitalski deleži povečevali tudi v prvi polovici leta 2010, k čemur so pripomogli večji zadržani dobički in nadaljnja povečevanja zasebnega kapitala ter javne kapitalske injekcije za nekatere banke.
See European Central Bank: ‘EU Banking Sector Stability, September 2010’.
Glej Evropska centralna banka: EU Banking Sector Stability, september 2010.
The future regulatory environment drawn up by the Basel Committee on the Banking Supervision (BCBS), so-called Basel III, sets a path for the implementation of the new capital rules which should allow banks to meet the new capital needs over time.
Prihodnje zakonodajno okolje, ki ga je pripravil Bazelski odbor za finančni nadzor (BCBS), t. i. Basel III, naj bi vključevalo izvajanje novih kapitalskih pravil, ki bi morala bankam omogočiti, da sčasoma izpolnijo nove kapitalske potrebe.
In this context, it is interesting to note that, first, most of the largest banks in the European Union have reinforced their capital buffers over the last two years to increase their loss absorption capacity and, second, the other banks in the European Union should have sufficient time (up to 2019) to build up their capital buffer using, inter alia, retained earnings.
V tem okviru je zanimivo, da je večina največjih bank v Evropski uniji v zadnjih dveh letih povečala svoje kapitalske rezerve, da bi povečala svoje zmogljivosti za nadomestitev izgub, ter da bi imele ostale banke v Evropski uniji dovolj časa (do leta 2019), da pripravijo svoje kapitalske rezerve, med drugim z uporabo zadržanih dobičkov.
It should also be noted that the ‘transitional arrangements’ provided by the new regulatory framework have established a ‘grandfathering period’ until 1 January 2018 for existing public sector capital injections.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da se s prehodno ureditvijo iz novega zakonodajnega okvira za obstoječe kapitalske injekcije iz javnega sektorja določa prehodno obdobje do 1. januarja 2018.
Moreover, a quantitative impact assessment done by the Basel Committee, confirmed by Commission calculations, points to a rather moderate impact on bank lending.
Tudi količinska presoja vplivov, ki jo je opravil Bazelski odbor, katerega izračune je potrdila Komisija, je potrdila precej omejen vpliv na posojila bank.
Therefore, the new capital requirements are not expected to impact the proposal outlined in these Guidelines.
Zato naj nove kapitalske zahteve ne bi vplivale na predlog iz teh smernic.
This will apply to all recapitalisation or impaired asset measures, irrespective of whether they are designed as individual measures or granted in the context of a scheme.
To bo veljalo za vse ukrepe dokapitalizacije in ukrepe za oslabljena sredstva, ne glede na to, ali so zasnovani kot individualni ukrepi ali dodeljeni v okviru sheme.
Existing or new bank support schemes (irrespective of the support instruments they contain: guarantee, recapitalisation, liquidity, asset relief, other) will only be prolonged/approved for a duration of six months to allow for further adjustments, if necessary, in mid-2011.
Obstoječe ali nove sheme pomoči bankam (ne glede na instrument pomoči: jamstvo, dokapitalizacija, likvidnost, pomoč za oslabljena sredstva, drugo) se bodo podaljšale/odobrile le za šest mesecev, da se po potrebi omogočijo nadaljnje prilagoditve sredi leta 2011.
Therefore, the Banking, Recapitalisation and Impaired Assets Guidelines, which provide guidance on the criteria for the compatibility of crisis-related aid to banks on the basis of Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement — most notably in the form of government guarantees, recapitalisations and asset relief measures — need to stay in place beyond 31 December 2010.
Zato morajo smernice o bančništvu, dokapitalizaciji in oslabljenih sredstvih, ki določajo merila skladnosti pomoči bankam, povezani s kriznimi ukrepi, na podlagi člena 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP – zlasti v obliki državnih jamstev, dokapitalizacije in ukrepov finančne pomoči za oslabljena sredstva – ostati v veljavi tudi po 31. decembru 2010.
In the same vein, the Restructuring Guidelines, which address the follow-up to such support measures, also have to remain applicable beyond that date.
Hkrati morajo ostati v veljavi po tem datumu tudi smernice o prestrukturiranju, ki opredeljujejo nadaljnje ukrepe po teh podpornih ukrepih.
In parallel, new, permanent State aid rules for bank rescue and restructuring in normal market conditions will have to be drawn up and should, market conditions permitting, apply as of 1 January 2012.
Hkrati je treba pripraviti nova trajna pravila o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje bank v običajnih tržnih pogojih, ki naj bi se začela uporabljati s 1. januarjem 2012, če bodo tržni pogoji to omogočali.
The possible continued need for crisis-induced extraordinary State aid to the financial sector has to be evaluated with that objective in mind.
Morebitno potrebo po nadaljnji izredni državni pomoči finančnemu sektorju, povezani s krizo, je treba oceniti ob upoštevanju tega cilja.
Government guarantee schemes can therefore be authorised until 30 June 2011, on the basis of the following conditions introduced as of 1 January 2011.
Državne jamstvene sheme so torej lahko dovoljene do 30. junija 2011, na podlagi naslednjih pogojev, ki so bili uvedeni s 1. januarjem 2011.
The Authority will reassess the conditions for the compatibility of state guarantees beyond 30 June 2011 in the first half of 2011.
V skladu z dosedanjo prakso bo Nadzorni organ v prvi polovici leta 2011 ponovno ocenil pogoje združljivosti državnih jamstev po 30. juniju 2011.
The credit risk element in the current pricing model is based upon data that predates the most acute phase of the crisis in 2008.
Element kreditnega tveganja v veljavnem modelu za določanje cen temelji na podatkih iz obdobja pred najhujšo krizo leta 2008.
CDS spread differentials across banks are currently significantly higher than pre-crisis and are likely to remain so.
Razlike v razponu poslov zamenjav dolgov med bankami so trenutno znatno večje kot pred krizo in kaže, da se to ne bo spremenilo.
At the current juncture in the evolution of market conditions, access to liquidity on the market no longer represents a serious obstacle for banks across the board as in the more acute crisis period.
Na sedanji točki v razvoju tržnih razmer dostop do likvidnosti na trgu ni več resna ovira za banke na splošno, kakor je to bilo v obdobju viška krize.
Accordingly, it seems justified to introduce a differentiation in the conditions attached to the use of state guarantees based on the extent to which banks rely on them.
Zato se zdi upravičeno uvesti razlikovanje pogojev, ki veljajo za uporabo državnih jamstev, glede na to, kako močno se banke na ta jamstva zanašajo.
The threshold is set at a ratio of 5 % of outstanding guaranteed liabilities over total liabilities and at a total amount of guaranteed debt of EUR 500 million. The determination of this trigger threshold is based on a comparative analysis which illustrates that the vast majority of banks that use guarantees and are presently not under restructuring obligations (and even a significant proportion of banks that are subject to such obligations) stay well below this level.
Prag je določen v višini 5 odstotkov neporavnanih zajamčenih obveznosti od skupnih obveznosti in dovoljeni skupni znesek zajamčenega dolga je 500 milijonov EUR. Določitev tega praga, ki sproži zahtevo po pregledu, temelji na primerjalni analizi, ki ponazarja, da velika večina bank, ki uporablja jamstva in za katere trenutno ne velja obveznost prestrukturiranja (in tudi znaten delež bank, za katere velja takšna obveznost), ostane močno pod tem pragom.
The continued applicability of Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement and the extension of the Restructuring Guidelines will be from 1 January 2011 until 31 December 2011 [26].
Nadaljnja uporaba člena 61(3)(b) Sporazuma EGP in podaljšanje smernic o prestrukturiranju bosta veljala od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2011 [26].
This extension under changed conditions should also be seen in the context of a gradual transition to a more permanent regime of State aid guidelines for the rescue and restructuring of banks based on Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement which should, market conditions permitting, apply as of 1 January 2012.
To podaljšanje pod spremenjenimi pogoji je treba razumeti tudi v kontekstu postopnega prehoda v trajnejši režim smernic za državne pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje bank na podlagi člena 61(3)(c) Sporazuma EGP, ki naj bi se začele uporabljati s 1. januarjem 2012, če bodo tržni pogoji to dopuščali.
These conclusions were endorsed by the European Council at its meeting on 11 December 2009.
Te sklepe je potrdil Evropski svet na zasedanju 11. decembra 2009.
In the same vein, the European Parliament insisted in its Resolution of 9 March 2010 on the Report on Competition Policy 2008(http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-0050) that state support to financial institutions should not be unduly prolonged and that exit strategies should be elaborated as soon as possible.
Hkrati je Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 9. marca 2010 o poročilu o politiki konkurence za leto 2008(http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-0050) vztrajal, da se državna podpora finančnim institucijam ne sme neupravičeno podaljševati in da je treba čim prej pripraviti strategije izstopa.
No 111/11/COL
št. 111/11/COL
amending the list contained in point 39 of Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement on the European Economic Area listing border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway agreed for veterinary checks on live animals and animal products from third countries and repealing EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 8/11/COL
o spremembi seznama iz točke 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, ki navaja mejne kontrolne točke na Islandiji in na Norveškem, odobrene za veterinarske preglede živih živali ter živalskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav, ter o razveljavitvi Odločbe Nadzornega organa Efte št. 8/11/COL
Having regard to point 4(B)(1) and (3) and point 5(b) of the Introductory Part of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement,
ob upoštevanju točk 4(B)(1) in (3) ter točke 5(b) uvodnega dela poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP,
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 4 of Part 1.1 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [1]), as amended and adapted to the EEA Agreement by the sectoral adaptations referred to in Annex I to that Agreement, and in particular to Article 6(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 4 dela 1.1 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [1]), kakor je bil spremenjen in prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s sektorskimi prilagoditvami iz Priloge I k navedenemu sporazumu, in zlasti člena 6(2) akta,
Having regard to College Decision No 86/11/COL empowering the competent College Member to adopt this decision,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe kolegija št. 86/11/COL o pooblastitvi pristojnega člana kolegija za sprejetje te odločbe,
The EFTA Surveillance Authority (hereinafter the Authority), by Decision No 8/11/COL of 26 January 2011 [2], repealed its Decision No 43/10/COL of 10 February 2010 [3] and drew up a new list of border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway approved for veterinary checks on live animals and animal products from third countries.On 1 March 2011, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (hereinafter Mattilsynet) informed the Authority that it had suspended the Border Inspection Post (BIP) Båtsfjord Port (TRACES Code NO BJF 1) from the Norwegian list of approved BIPs, following the extensive damage suffered by the facilities of the BIP in a fire on 28 January 2011. Mattilsynet indicated that as a result of this fire, the BIP could no longer fulfil the requirements in the legislation concerning social rooms, laboratory and storage facilities.
Nadzorni organ Efte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Nadzorni organ) je z Odločbo št. 8/11/COL z dne 26. januarja 2011 [2] razveljavil svojo Odločbo št. 43/10/COL z dne 10. februarja 2010 [3] in sestavil nov seznam mejnih kontrolnih točk na Islandiji in na Norveškem, odobrenih za veterinarske preglede živih živali in živalskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav.Norveški organ za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Mattilsynet) je 1. marca 2011 Nadzorni organ obvestil, da je zaradi znatne škode, ki jo je 28. januarja 2011 povzročil požar v prostorih mejne kontrolne točke Båtsfjord Port (oznaka TRACES NO BJF 1), slednjo izločil z norveškega seznama odobrenih mejnih kontrolnih točk.
The suspension of the approval, and the subsequent provision of information to the Authority, was done in accordance with the Norwegian legislation Instruks om grensekontrollstasjoner mv.
Mattilsynet je sporočil, da ta mejna kontrolna točka zaradi požara ni mogla več izvajati zahtev iz zakonodaje v zvezi z družabnimi prostori, laboratoriji in skladišči.
Chapter I, point 2, which implements Article 6(3) of Directive 97/78/EC, and according to which the national competent authority shall inform the Authority about changes at a BIP or Inspection Centre (IC) which may be of importance concerning the list contained in point 39 of Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement on the European Economic Area listing border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway.
Začasna odložitev odobritve in predložitev informacij Nadzornemu organu sta bili opravljeni v skladu z norveško zakonodajo Instruks om grensekontrollstasjoner mv., poglavje I, točka 2, ki izvaja člen 6(3) Direktive 97/78/ES in v skladu s katero pristojni nacionalni organ Nadzorni organ obvesti o spremembah v zvezi z mejno kontrolno točko ali kontrolnim središčem, ki bi lahko zadevale seznam iz točke 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP, ki vsebuje mejne kontrolne točke na Islandiji in Norveškem.
According to Article 6(4) of Directive 97/78/EC, the Authority shall draw up and publish a list of approved border inspection posts, including cases where approval has been temporarily suspended.
V skladu s členom 6(4) Direktive 97/78/ES Nadzorni organ sestavi in objavi seznam odobrenih mejnih kontrolnih točk, vključno s tistimi, katerih odobritev je bila začasno odložena.
It is therefore the Authority’s obligation to amend the list of border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway and to publish a new list, reflecting the suspension of the BIP Båtsfjord Port (TRACES Code NO BJF 1) from the Norwegian list of BIPs.
Zato mora Nadzorni organ spremeniti seznam mejnih kontrolnih točk na Islandiji in Norveškem ter objaviti nov seznam, iz katerega je razviden začasni umik mejne kontrolne točke Båtsfjord Port (oznaka TRACES NO BJF 1) z norveškega seznama mejnih kontrolnih točk.
The Authority has referred the matter to the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority.
Nadzorni organ je predložil zadevo Veterinarskemu odboru Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu Efte.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the unanimous opinion of the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the final text of the measures remains unchanged.
Ukrepi iz te odločbe so v skladu s soglasnim mnenjem Veterinarskega odbora Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu Efte, zato končna različica besedila o ukrepih ostane nespremenjena –
BIP Båtsfjord Port (TRACES Code NO BJF 1) is suspended until further notice from the list contained in point 39 of Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement on the European Economic Area of border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway agreed for veterinary checks on live animals and animal products from third countries.
BIP Båtsfjord Port (oznaka TRACES NO BJF 1) se do preklica začasno umakne s seznama iz točke 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP mejnih kontrolnih točk na Islandiji in na Norveškem, odobrenih za veterinarske preglede živih živali in živalskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 08/11/COL of 26 January 2011 is hereby repealed.
Odločba Nadzornega organa Efte št. 08/11/COL z dne 26. januarja 2011 se razveljavi.
This Decision shall enter into force on 11 April 2011.
Ta odločba začne veljati 11. aprila 2011.
OJ L 85, 31.3.2011, p. 27 and EEA Supplement No 16, 31.3.2011, p. 1.
UL L 85, 31.3.2011, str. 27, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 16, 31.3.2011, str. 1.
OJ L 256, 30.9.2010, p. 30 and EEA Supplement No 53, 30.9.2010, p. 1.
UL L 256, 30.9.2010, str. 30, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 53, 30.9.2010, str. 1.
LIST OF AGREED BORDER INSPECTION POSTS
SEZNAM ODOBRENIH MEJNIH KONTROLNIH TOČK
U Ungulates: cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, wild and domestic solipeds
U kopitarji: govedo, prašiči, ovce, koze, divji in domači enoprsti kopitarji
E Registered equidae as defined in Council Directive 90/426/EEC
E registrirani enoprsti kopitarji, kakor so opredeljeni v Direktivi Sveta 90/426/EGS
Suspended on the basis of Article 6 of Directive 97/78/EC until further notice, as noted in columns 1, 4, 5 and 6
Na podlagi člena 6 Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES do preklica začasno umaknjena, kakor je navedeno v stolpcih 1, 4, 5 in 6.
Equidae only
samo enoprsti kopitarji
For (U) in the case of solipeds, only those consigned to a zoo; and for (O), only day-old chicks, fish, dogs, cats, insects, or other animals consigned to a zoo
za (U) v primeru enoprstih kopitarjev, samo tisti, namenjeni v živalski vrt, ter za (O) samo dan stari piščanci, ribe, psi, mačke, žuželke ali druge živali, namenjene v živalski vrt
Aquaculture animals only
samo živali iz akvakulture
IS AKU1
IS AKU 1
IS ISA1
IS ISA 1
IS THH1
IS THH 1
No 176/11/COL
št. 176/11/COL
to close the formal investigation procedure with regard to the financing of the fitness centre at the Kippermoen Leisure Centre (Norway)
o končanju formalnega postopka preiskave v zvezi s financiranjem fitnes centra v rekreacijskem centru Kippermoen (Norveška)
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY (the Authority),
NADZORNI ORGAN EFTE (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Nadzorni organ) JE –
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (the EEA Agreement) and in particular Articles 61 and 62 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) in zlasti členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma,