natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
notes that the conflicts of interests policy concerning the Office's staff members follows the same principles, and that the staff members' conflicts of interests declarations are also available through the Office's public register;
ugotavlja, da pravilnik o navzkrižju interesov za uslužbence urada temelji na istih načelih in da so tudi izjave o navzkrižju interesov uslužbencev na voljo v javnem registru urada;
Takes note that the Office has not planned a review of its conflicts of interest policy in place, and that it considers all relevant policies on conflicts of interest as being in line with the Commission's Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interest in EU Decentralised Agencies from December 2013;
ugotavlja, da urad ni predvidel revizije obstoječega pravilnika o navzkrižju interesov in da so po njegovi oceni vsi tovrstni pravilniki usklajeni s smernicami Komisije o preprečevanju in obvladovanju navzkrižij interesov v decentraliziranih agencijah EU iz decembra 2013;
acknowledges that the Office aims at raising awareness of its policy on conflicts of interest, as well as that of its Board, and that it will closely follow-up all relevant changes in this field;
je seznanjen s tem, da namerava urad ozaveščati vpletene o svojem pravilniku o navzkrižju interesov, pa tudi o pravilniku svojega odbora, in da namerava pozorno spremljati vse pomembne novosti na tem področju;
Notes that the Office has met all formal requirements for the Internal Control Standard (ICS) on Information and Communication (ICS 12);
ugotavlja, da je urad izpolnil vse uradne pogoje za standard notranje revizije za obveščanje in komuniciranje (ICS 12);
Acknowledges that the Office is adapting its planning and reporting to include measurable targets in order to implement the ICS on Objectives and Performance Indicators (ICS 5);
je seznanjen, da bo urad prilagodil načrtovanje in poročanje ter postavil merljive cilje, da bi izpolnil standard notranje revizije za cilje in kazalnike uspešnosti (ICS 5);
notes that the Office completed its own procedure manuals and adopted a detailed internal procedure for registration of all non-compliant events in order to implement the ICS on Process and Procedures (ICS 8);
ugotavlja, da je urad sestavil lastne postopkovne priročnike in sprejel podroben interni postopek za registracijo neskladnih dogodkov, da bi izpolnil standard notranje revizije za procese in postopke (ICS 8);
takes note that the Office has updated its internal procedures on documents management in order to comply with the ICS on Document Management (ICS 11);
je seznanjen, da je urad posodobil interne postopke za upravljanje dokumentov, da bi izpolnil standard notranje revizije za upravljanje dokumentov (ICS 11);
Takes note that the Office established an inventory procedure regarding the registration and disposal of fixed assets which was adopted as part of its Financial Manual;
je seznanjen, da je urad uvedel inventurni postopek v zvezi z registracijo in odpisom osnovnih sredstev, ki je bil sprejet kot del finančnega priročnika;
notes that a physical inventory was carried out in August 2013;
ugotavlja, da je bil popis inventarja opravljen avgusta 2013;
welcomes the fact that, according to the Office's procedures, an asset inventory is to be completed each year;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da namerava urad inventuro izvesti vsako leto;
Notes that a review of the ICS is scheduled by the Internal Audit Service;
ugotavlja, da bo standarde ICS pregledala služba za notranjo revizijo;
calls on the Office to report to the discharge authority on the results of that review as soon as they are available;
poziva urad, naj organu za razrešnico poroča o rezultatih tega pregleda, takoj ko bodo na voljo;
Welcomes the steps recently taken by the Office towards an improved communication with the European citizens about the impact its work has on them, in particular focusing on measurable and clearly defined objectives which allow for a better assessment of its activities;
pozdravlja ukrepe urada za boljše obveščanje evropskih državljanov o tem, kako njegove dejavnosti vplivajo na njihova življenja, zlasti dejstvo, da se je osredotočil na merljive in jasno opredeljene cilje, zaradi česar bo ocenjevanje njegovih dejavnosti lažje;
Notes that the Office has begun to increase its profile as a Union body by uploading the Union logo on some pages on its website, and looks forward to this being extended to the BEREC's home page and systematically to all communications, thereby ensuring visibility of the contribution from the Union budget to the Office;
ugotavlja, da se je začel urad uveljavljati kot organ Unije, saj je na nekaterih straneh na svojem spletnem mestu objavil logotip Unije, in pričakuje, da bo to storil tudi na svoji domači strani in ga sistematično uporabljal pri komuniciranju, s čimer bo zagotovil prepoznavnost prispevka, ki ga prejema iz proračuna Unije;
Refers, in respect of the other observations accompanying its Decision on discharge, which are of a horizontal nature, to its resolution of 3 April 2014 [8] on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.
sporoča, da so druge ugotovitve horizontalne narave, ki spremljajo sklep o razrešnici, zbrane v resoluciji z dne 3. aprila 2014 [8] o uspešnosti, finančnem poslovodenju in nadzoru agencij.
OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p.
UL L 337, 18.12.2009, str. 1.
with observations forming an integral part of the Decision on discharge for implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012, Section II — European Council and Council
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012, oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet
having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012 [1],having regard to the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012 (COM(2013) 570 — C7-0275/2013) [2],having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2012, together with the institutions' replies [3],having regard to the statement of assurance [4] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2012, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,having regard to its decision of 3 April 2014 [5] postponing its decision on granting discharge for the financial year 2012, and the accompanying resolution,having regard to Article 314(10) and Articles 317, 318 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012 [1],ob upoštevanju konsolidiranega zaključnega računa Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012 (COM(2013)570 – C7–0275/2013) [2],ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2012 z odgovori institucij [3],ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti [4] računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij, ki jo je za proračunsko leto 2012 v skladu s členom 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pripravilo Računsko sodišče,ob upoštevanju svojega sklepa z dne 3. aprila 2014 [5] o odlogu sklepa o podelitvi razrešnice za proračunsko leto 2012 in priložene resolucije,ob upoštevanju člena 314(10) ter členov 317, 318 in 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
A. Whereas all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions;
A. ker bi morale vse institucije Unije poslovati pregledno in biti v celoti odgovorne državljanom Unije za porabo sredstev, ki so jim bila zaupana kot institucijam Unije;
B. Whereas the European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability towards the citizens of the Union as far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union;
B. ker bi morala biti Evropski svet in Svet kot instituciji Unije demokratično odgovorna državljanom Unije, saj prejemata sredstva iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije;
C. Whereas Parliament is the sole directly elected body among the Union institutions and has responsibility to grant discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union;
C. ker je Parlament edini neposredno izvoljeni organ med institucijami Unije in je odgovoren za podelitev razrešnice za izvrševanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije;
Emphasises Parliament's role specified in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in respect of the budget discharge;
poudarja vlogo, ki je v Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) zaupana Parlamentu glede podelitve razrešnice za izvrševanje proračuna;
Points out that under Article 335 TFEU, ‘the Union shall be represented by each of the institutions, by virtue of their administrative autonomy, in matters relating to their respective operation’ and that accordingly, taking into account Article 55 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (the Financial Regulation), the institutions are individually responsible for the implementation of their budgets;
opozarja, da v skladu s členom 335 PDEU „v zadevah, povezanih z delovanjem posameznih institucij, Unijo zastopa vsaka institucija na podlagi svoje upravne avtonomije“, kar pomeni, da so ob upoštevanju člena 55 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 (finančna uredba), institucije vsaka posebej odgovorne za izvrševanje svojega proračuna;
Emphasises the role of Parliament and of other institutions within the discharge procedure as governed by the provisions of the Financial Regulation, in particular Articles 164 to 166 thereof;
poudarja vlogo Parlamenta in drugih institucij v postopku razrešnice v skladu z določbami finančne uredbe, in zlasti členov 164 do 166 Uredbe;
Notes that under Rule 94 of its Rules of Procedure, ‘the provisions governing the procedure for granting discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget shall likewise apply to the procedure for granting discharge to […] the persons responsible for the implementation of the budgets of other institutions and bodies of the European Union such as the Council (as regards its activity as executive)’;
ugotavlja, da se v skladu s členom 94 Poslovnika „določbe, ki urejajo postopek podelitve razrešnice Komisiji glede izvrševanja proračuna, […] smiselno uporabljajo tudi za […] postopek podelitve razrešnice osebam, odgovornim za izvrševanje proračunov drugih institucij in organov Evropske unije, kot so Svet (glede njegovega delovanja kot izvršilnega organa)“;
Opinion of the Court of Auditors on the European Council and the Council in its statement of assurance for the financial year 2012
Mnenje Računskega sodišča o Evropskem svetu in Svetu v njegovi izjavi o zanesljivosti za proračunsko leto 2012
Emphasises the fact that in the annual report concerning the financial year 2012, the Court of Auditors included observations on the European Council and the Council concerning errors in the design of procurement procedures;
poudarja, da je Računsko sodišče v letno poročilo za proračunsko leto 2012 vključilo ugotovitve o Evropskem svetu in Svetu v zvezi z napakami pri pripravi postopkov javnih naročil;
notes that one error relates to the performance of a negotiated procedure and that another relates to the application of a selection criterion;
ugotavlja, da se ena napaka nanaša na izvedbo postopka s pogajanji, druga pa na uporabo enega od izbirnih meril;
Notes the Council's reply that ‘the Council and European Council have a solid centralised procurement framework in place that was recently adapted to the new Financial Regulation and rules of application and will be reinforced with the design of new templates of contracts and invitations to tender as well as the development of specific training courses on how to define and apply selection and award criteria’;
je seznanjen z odgovorom Sveta, da sta „Svet in Evropski svet vzpostavila trden centraliziran okvir za javna naročila, ki je bil nedavno prilagojen novi finančni uredbi in njenim pravilom uporabe in bo še dodatno okrepljen z novimi predlogami pogodb in razpisov, pripravljeni pa bodo tudi posebni tečaji usposabljanja o tem, kako opredeliti in uporabljati merila za izbor in dodeljevanje“;
Shares the Court of Auditors' recommendations that the authorising officers of the European Council and the Council should improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures by means of appropriate checks and better guidance;
soglaša s priporočili Računskega sodišča, da bi morali odredbodajalci Evropskega sveta in Sveta z ustreznimi pregledi in boljšimi navodili izboljšati pripravo, usklajevanje in izvajanje postopkov javnih naročil;
Notes that the Council did not provide any further replies to the Court of Auditors' recommendations;
ugotavlja, da Svet ni podal dodatnih odgovorov na priporočila Računskega sodišča;
Pending issues
Nerešena vprašanja
Reiterates its call on the Council to inform Parliament about the progress of construction and the final costs projection of the ‘Europa’ building;
znova poziva Svet, naj obvešča Parlament o napredku pri gradnji in o končnem finančnem okviru stavbe Evropa;
Invites the Council to explain all the measures implemented throughout the construction of the ‘Europa’ building in order to improve the execution of the project;
poziva Svet, naj pojasni vse ukrepe, ki se izvajajo oziroma se bodo izvajali med gradnjo stavbe Evropa, da bi se izboljšala izvedba projekta;
Reminds the Council of Parliament's call for a progress report on the ‘Residence Palace’ building project and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date;
opozarja Svet na poziv Parlamenta, naj pripravi poročilo o napredku pri projektu gradnje stavbe Residence Palace in podrobno razčleni doslej nastale stroške;
Urges the Council to provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the ‘Residence Palace’ building, the budget items from which these appropriations were drawn, the instalments that have been paid thus far, the instalments that remain to be paid and the purpose that the building will serve;
poziva Svet, naj pripravi izčrpno pisno pojasnilo in v njem navede celotni znesek proračunskih sredstev, porabljenih za nakup stavbe Residence Palace, proračunske postavke, iz katerih se je ta denar črpal, obroke, ki so bili že plačani, obroke, ki jih bo treba še poravnati, in namen stavbe;
Reiterates its call on the Council to provide information on its process of administrative modernisation, in particular on the concrete implementing measures of that process and on the anticipated impact on the Council's budget;
ponovno poziva Svet, naj posreduje informacije o svojem procesu upravne modernizacije, zlasti o konkretnih izvedbenih ukrepih tega procesa in o predvidenih posledicah za proračun Sveta;
Regrets the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council;
obžaluje, da so se v dosedanjih postopkih podelitve razrešnice vedno znova pojavljale težave, ker Svet ni bil pripravljen sodelovati;
points out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010 and 2011 for the reasons set out in its resolutions of 10 May 2011 [9], 25 October 2011 [10], 10 May 2012 [11], 23 October 2012 [12], 17 April 2013 [13] and 9 October 2013 [14], and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2012 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 3 April 2014;
poudarja, da je Parlament zavrnil podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunska leta 2009, 2010 in 2011 in svoje razloge za to navedel v resolucijah z dne 10. maja 2011 [9], 25. oktobra 2011 [10], 10. maja 2012 [11], 23. oktobra 2012 [12], 17. aprila 2013 [13] in 9. oktobra 2013 [14], podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunsko leto 2012 pa je odložil zaradi razlogov, ki jih je navedel v resoluciji z dne 3. aprila 2014;
Insists that an effective budgetary control exercise requires the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, as set out in its resolution of 3 April 2014;
vztraja, da je za izvajanje učinkovitega proračunskega nadzora potrebno sodelovanje Parlamenta in Sveta, kot je opredeljeno v njegovi resoluciji z dne 3. aprila 2014;
confirms that Parliament is unable to make an informed decision on granting discharge;
potrjuje, da Parlament ne more sprejeti utemeljene odločitve o podelitvi razrešnice;
Recalls that as a result of its discharge decision adopted on 17 April 2013, Parliament sent the Council's questions to the Commission and the Commission replied by letter of 23 January 2014;
spominja, da je Parlament po sprejetju sklepa o razrešnici z dne 17. aprila 2013 vprašanja Sveta poslal Komisiji, ta pa je odgovorila v pismu z dne 23. januarja 2014;
reminds the Council of the Commission's view that all institutions are fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure;
opozarja Svet na stališče Komisije, da so vse institucije v celoti del procesa nadaljnjih ukrepov v zvezi z ugotovitvami Parlamenta v postopku podelitve razrešnice in da bi morale v medsebojnem sodelovanju zagotoviti nemoten potek postopka razrešnice;
Notes that the Commission stated in the abovementioned letter that it will not oversee the implementation of the budget of the other institutions and that giving a response to questions addressed to another institution would infringe the autonomy of that institution to implement its own section of the budget;
ugotavlja, da Komisija v istem pismu navaja, da ne bo nadzorovala izvrševanja proračunov drugih institucij in da bi odgovarjanje na vprašanja, naslovljena na drugo institucijo, posegalo v avtonomijo te institucije pri izvrševanju lastnega dela proračuna;
Regrets that the Council continues to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions;
obžaluje, da Svet še vedno ni odgovoril na vprašanja Parlamenta;
recalls the conclusions of the Parliament workshop on Parliament's Right to Grant Discharge to the Council held on 27 September 2012 at which the legal and academic experts largely agreed on Parliament's right to information;
opozarja na zaključke z delavnice Parlamenta o pravici Parlamenta do podelitve razrešnice Svetu, ki je potekala 27. septembra 2012, na kateri so se pravni in akademski strokovnjaki večinoma strinjali s pravico do obveščenosti Parlamenta;
in this respect refers to the third subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU which stipulates that each institution, body, office or agency shall ensure that its proceedings are transparent;
s tem v zvezi se sklicuje na tretji pododstavek člena 15(3) PDEU, ki določa, da vsaka institucija, organ, urad ali agencija zagotovi preglednost svojih postopkov;
Insists that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and that the fundamental elements of such scrutiny have been laid down in its discharge resolutions of the past years, in particular the discharge resolution of 23 October 2012;
vztraja, da je treba odhodke Sveta pregledovati na enak način kot odhodke drugih institucij in da so bili temeljni elementi takšnega pregledovanja določeni v resolucijah o podelitvi razrešnice iz preteklih let, zlasti v resoluciji o razrešnici z dne 23. oktobra 2012;
Emphasises Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge pursuant to Article 316, 317 and 319 TFEU, in line with current interpretation and practice, namely to grant discharge to each heading of the budget individually in order to maintain transparency and democratic accountability towards Union taxpayers;
opozarja na pristojnosti Parlamenta za podelitev razrešnice iz členov 316, 317 in 319 PDEU v skladu s sedanjo razlago in prakso, in sicer da razrešnico podeli za vsak proračunski naslov posebej, da se ohranita preglednost in demokratična odgovornost davkoplačevalcem Unije;
Takes the view that failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermines the right of citizens of the Union to information and transparency and is becoming a cause for concern, reflecting as it does a certain democratic deficit within the Union institutions;
meni, da dejstvo, da zahtevani dokumenti niso bili posredovani Parlamentu, spodkopava zlasti pravico državljanov Unije do obveščenosti in preglednosti ter postaja razlog za skrb, saj priča o določenem demokratičnem primanjkljaju v institucijah Unije;
urges the Council, therefore, not to treat Parliament's requests for access to information as a bid for institutional supremacy but to give priority to the right of the public to be fully informed;
zato poziva Svet, naj si zahtev Parlamenta za dostop do informacij ne razlaga kot poskusa prevlade nad drugo institucijo, temveč naj da prednost pravici javnosti do polne obveščenosti;
Believes that it is necessary to consider different possibilities to update the rules on granting discharge laid down in the TFEU;
meni, da je treba preučiti različne možnosti za posodobitev pravil o podelitvi razrešnice, ki so določena v PDEU;
Finds that Parliament and the Council could make some progress by setting up a modus vivendi procedure together with a list of documents to be exchanged in order to fulfil their respective roles in the discharge process;
meni, da bi Parlament in Svet lahko dosegla določen napredek, če bi skupaj opredelila postopek „modus vivendi“ s seznamom dokumentov, ki bi jih morala izmenjati, da bi izpolnila svoji vlogi v postopku podelitve razrešnice;
encourages, in this respect, the Council to seek a political solution to the Council discharge regardless the different legal views which Parliament and the Council continue to hold;
v zvezi s tem spodbuja Svet, naj poišče politično rešitev za podelitev razrešnice Svetu, ne glede na svoja pravna stališča, ki se še vedno razlikujejo od pravnih stališč Parlamenta;
Considers that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure can be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.
meni, da je lahko zadovoljivo sodelovanje med Parlamentom, Evropskim svetom in Svetom, ki je rezultat postopka odprtega in formalnega dialoga, pozitiven znak za državljane Unije.
OJ L 250, 27.9.2011, p. 25.
UL L 250, 27.9.2011, str. 25.
OJ L 313, 26.11.2011, p. 13.
UL L 313, 26.11.2011, str. 13.
OJ L 286, 17.10.2012, p. 23.
UL L 286, 17.10.2012, str. 23.
OJ L 350, 20.12.2012, p. 71.
UL L 350, 20.12.2012, str. 71.
OJ L 308, 16.11.2013, p. 22.
UL L 308, 16.11.2013, str. 22.
OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 97.
UL L 328, 7.12.2013, str. 97.
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section I — European Parliament
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2013, oddelek I – Evropski parlament
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section I — European Parliament,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2013, oddelek I – Evropski parlament,
having regard to the Decision of the European Ombudsman of 26 February 2015 closing her own-initiative inquiry OI/1/2014/PMC concerning whistleblowing,
ob upoštevanju odločbe evropske varuhinje človekovih pravic OI/1/2014/PMC z dne 26. februarja 2015, s katero je zaključila svojo preiskavo na lastno pobudo o prijavljanju nepravilnosti,
having regard to Rule 94 and Rule 98(3) of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju člena 94, člena 98(3) in Priloge V Poslovnika,