natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OJ C 365, 13.12.2013, p.
agencija po sklepu izvršilnega odbora (Sklep 2012/04) sedaj uporablja smernice Komisije; ugotavlja, da bodo smernice nadomeščene takoj, ko bo agencija sprejela vzorčne smernice regulativnih agencij glede opozarjanja na nepravilnosti,
221.
so bile izjave o interesih in življenjepisi vodstva ter večine polnopravnih članov upravnega odbora naložene na spletno stran agencije;
OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p.
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je agencija leta 2012 naročila storitve čiščenja prek kaskadnih okvirnih pogodb pri dveh dobaviteljih in da sta bila izvajalca zaradi pisne napake pri ocenjevanju ponudb nepravilno razvrščena; ugotavlja, da je bila zaradi te napake leta 2012 podpisana ena posebna pogodba v višini 56784 EUR, z njo povezana plačila pa so nepravilna; ugotavlja, da je po reviziji Računskega sodišča agencija ustrezno spremenila razvrstitev izvajalcev;
1.
ugotavlja, da je zaradi proračunskega spremljanja v proračunskem letu 2012 stopnja izvrševanja proračuna dosegla 100 %; ugotavlja, da je bila stopnja izvrševanja plačil 78,5 %;
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2] (‘the Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 185 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of the Council of 26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions [4], and in particular Article 16 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
ugotavlja, da je bila stopnja izvrševanja proračuna za naslov III (operativni odhodki) z 49 % odobrenih proračunskih sredstev nizka; vendar ugotavlja, da to ne izhaja iz zamud pri izvajanju letnega delovnega programa agencije in da ta nizka stopnja odraža večletno naravo dejavnosti; ugotavlja, da je agencija sprejela modul za načrtovanje proračuna, ki je neposredno povezan z njenim letnim delovnim programom, plačila pa so bila načrtovana in izvedena v skladu z operativnimi potrebami, ter da Računsko sodišče meni, da je tako stanje sprejemljivo;
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of Eurojust for the financial year 2012
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče pri letni reviziji ni našlo večjih težav v zvezi s stopnjo prenosov leta 2012; izraža pohvalo agenciji za upoštevanje načela enoletnosti in pravočasno izvrševanje proračuna;
having regard to the final annual accounts of Eurojust for the financial year 2012,
ugotavlja, da je iz letnega poročila o dejavnostih in ugotovitev Računskega sodišča razvidno, da sta bili višina in narava prerazporeditev v letu 2012 skladni s finančnimi pravili; izraža pohvalo agenciji za dobro proračunsko načrtovanje;
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of Eurojust for the financial year 2012, together with the Eurojust’s replies [1],having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 (05849/2014 – C7-0054/2014),
potrjuje, da bo agencija na podlagi smernic Komisije za preprečevanje in obvladovanje navzkrižja interesov v decentraliziranih agencijah EU pregledala svojo politiko preprečevanja in obvladovanja navzkrižja interesov; poziva agencijo, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice seznani z rezultati pregleda, ko bodo ti na voljo;
having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime [4], and in particular Article 36 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
Notranje revizije in kontrole
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on the Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0186/2014),
je seznanjen s trditvami agencije, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo (IAS) leta 2012 v agenciji izvedla revizijo javnih naročil in podala dve zelo pomembni in sedem pomembnih priporočil; ugotavlja, da je agencija predlagala akcijski načrt, ki ga je IAS odobrila, in da je do roka 31. decembra 2012 zaključila osem priporočil; ugotavlja, da je bilo preostalo pomembno priporočilo zaključeno leta 2013;
A. whereas according to its financial statements, the final budget of Eurojust for the financial year 2012 was EUR 33322996, representing an increase of 6,27 % compared to 2011,
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da agencija v letu 2012 ni imela vzpostavljenega uradnega postopka naknadnega preverjanja; z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je bil zatem, ko je agencija opravila izčrpno analizo tveganja, uradni postopek uveden na začetku leta 2013;
B. whereas, according to its financial statements, the contribution of the Union to Eurojust’s budget for 2012 amounted to EUR 32967000, representing an increase of 5,21 % compared to 2011,
UL C 365, 13.12.2013, str.
C. whereas the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that Eurojust’s annual accounts for the financial year 2012 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular,
245.
Notes from the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts that out of four comments made in 2011, two corrective actions taken in response to the previous year’s comments are still marked as ‘outstanding’ and two as ‘completed’;
UL L 53, 22.2.2007, str.
Acknowledges from Eurojust that:
1.
it has provided the discharge authority with a report presenting the measures adopted and implemented following the discharge authority’s recommendations of 2010,
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropske agencije za upravljanje operativnega sodelovanja na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012
different measures have been introduced to reduce the automatic carry-overs of commitments that aim at executing the budget in a timely manner, such as a new forecasting report reinforcing the operational units’ budget planning and execution, information on the overall budget execution being sent monthly, the Budget, Finance and Procurement Unit working in close contact with the operational units to assist them in the budget implementation and mandatory expenditure lifecycle training for all actors involved in the budget implementation,
ob upoštevanju letnih računovodskih izkazov Evropske agencije za upravljanje operativnega sodelovanja na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012,
in order to reduce the vacancy rate and eliminate shortcomings in the implementation of recruitment procedures, Eurojust has set up a comprehensive recruitment action plan for 2012, putting the vacancy rate at the end of 2012 at 11,74 %;
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Evropske agencije za upravljanje operativnega sodelovanja na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012 z odgovori agencije [1],ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta z dne 18. februarja 2014 (05849/2014 – C7-0054/2014),
Comment on the legality and regularity of transactions
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve (A7-0181/2014),
Notes with concern that a framework contract for security services was signed in 2008 and amended in 2009; notes that the amended formula to calculate prices progressively increased them by 22 %, whereas the original framework contract had provided for a maximum increase of 4 %; notes that the total price increase above the 4 % ceiling amounted to some EUR 440000 for the 2008 to 2012 period, of which some EUR 68000 were paid in 2012; expresses concern that such a significant increase may undermine the transparency and fairness of the initial procurement procedure and distort competition;
A. ker računovodski izkazi Evropske agencije za upravljanje operativnega sodelovanja na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: agencija) kažejo, da je proračun agencije v proračunskem letu 2012 znašal 89578000 EUR, kar pomeni 24,21-odstotno zmanjšanje v primerjavi z letom 2011;
Notes that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2012 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 98 % for Title I, almost 100 % for Title II and 96 % for Title III in 2012; notes that the payment appropriations execution rate was 96 % for Title I, 85 % for Title II and 74 % for Title III;
B. ker je v skladu z računovodskimi izkazi agencije skupni prispevek Unije v proračun agencije za leto 2012 znašal 84000000 EUR, kar je 24,32 % manj kot v letu 2011;
Acknowledges that the Court of Auditors’ annual audit has found no notable issues as regards the level of carry-overs in 2012; commends Eurojust for adhering to the principle of annuality and for the timely execution of its budget;
C. ker je Računsko sodišče navedlo, da je prejelo zadostno zagotovilo o zanesljivosti letnih računovodskih izkazov agencije za proračunsko leto 2012, ni pa moglo pridobiti dovolj ustreznih revizijskih dokazov o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij;
Notes with satisfaction that according to the annual activity report as well as the Court of Auditors’ audit’s findings, the level and nature of transfers in 2012 have remained within the limits of the financial rules; commends Eurojust for its good budgetary planning;
Odklonitev mnenja o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij
Procurement and Recruitment procedures
obžaluje, da Računsko sodišče zaradi pomembnosti in razširjenosti zadeve, opisane v okviru osnove za odklonitev mnenja, ni moglo izraziti svojega mnenja o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij;
Requires Eurojust to improve the transparency of recruitment procedures; notes that there was no evidence that questions for tests and interviews were set before the examination of the applications by the Selection Board and there is no evidence that the weighting between written tests and interviews was set before candidates’ screening; calls on Eurojust to follow this up within the framework of discharge 2012 follow-up report;
Osnova za odklonitev mnenja o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij
Acknowledges Eurojust’s arrangements for the prevention and management of conflicts of interests; calls on Eurojust to inform the discharge authority of its intention to review its arrangements on the basis of the Commission’s Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of Conflict of Interest in EU Decentralised Agencies;
obžaluje, da zaradi pomanjkanja učinkovitih predhodnih in naknadnih preverjanj ni zadostnih zagotovil v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo transakcij; obžaluje, da Računsko sodišče ni moglo pridobiti dovolj ustreznih revizijskih dokazov o zakonitosti in pravilnosti revidiranih transakcij za nepovratna sredstva v zvezi z dejavnostmi agencije v letu 2012, ki znašajo 56000000 EUR in predstavljajo 63 % odhodkov iz poslovanja;
Observes that the CVs and declarations of interests of the members of the Management Board, the Executive Director and senior management are not publicly available; calls on Eurojust to remedy the situation as a matter of urgency;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da kljub strategiji naknadnih revizij, sprejeti leta 2012, in trem opravljenim revizijam niso bili preverjeni še nobeni odhodki za leto 2012;
Acknowledges from Eurojust that in 2012 the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS) carried out a follow up engagement in accordance with the Eurojust’s Strategic Audit Plan; observes that in the course of the risk analysis, the IAS identified certain processes of high inherent risk which could not be considered as auditable within the audit plan, that Eurojust management submitted an action plan aimed at addressing these weaknesses and the actions undertaken by Eurojust were to be followed up by the IAS during the next in-depth risk assessment (2013); notes that there were four ‘very important’ recommendations from the years before which still were in the process of being addressed by Eurojust;
je seznanjen s trditvami agencije, da so njeni upravičenci javni organi mejne kontrole držav članic in držav, pridruženih k schengenskemu pravnemu redu, ki morajo podpisati izjave, da so vse zagotovljene informacije popolne, zanesljive in resnične, ter potrditi, da so njihovi zahtevki za plačilo, kadar zahtevajo povračilo, utemeljeni z ustreznimi dokazili; ugotavlja, da agencija zato ne meni, da učinkovitih predhodnih kontrol ni, ampak da temeljijo na izjavah, ki jih zagotovijo javni organi, in preverjanjih verodostojnosti;
Requests that Eurojust communicate the results and impact its work has on European citizens in an accessible way, mainly through its website;
ugotavlja, da je agencija izvedla ukrepe za okrepitev okvira predhodnih kontrol in junija 2013 uvedla sistem predhodnih kontrol na podlagi tveganj; poziva agencijo in Računsko sodišče, naj poiščeta obojestransko sprejemljivo rešitev, ki bo upoštevala revizijske standarde Računskega sodišča in posebni položaj agencije;
OJ C 365, 13.12.2013, p.
ugotavlja, da je zaradi proračunskega spremljanja v proračunskem letu 2012 stopnja izvrševanja proračuna dosegla 98,86 % in da je stopnja izvrševanja plačil znašala 75,23 %;
228.
ugotavlja, da je letna revizija Računskega sodišča razkrila, da je bilo 21800000 EUR (25 % prevzetih sredstev) prenesenih v leto 2013, medtem ko so prenosi v zvezi z naslovom III znašali 19600000 EUR; želi spomniti, da je raven prenosov večinoma povezana z operativnim in večletnim značajem dejavnosti agencije;
OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p.
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je raven prenosov prekomerna, kot je bila že leta 2011, in v nasprotju s proračunskim načelom enoletnosti; vseeno priznava, da so prenosi neizogiben rezultat tega, da agencija opravlja svoje dolžnosti;
1.
ugotavlja, da je iz letnega poročila o dejavnostih in ugotovitev revizije Računskega sodišča razvidno, da je agencija opravila 39 proračunskih prerazporeditev v skupnem znesku 11500000 EUR, ki so vplivale na 70 od 79 proračunskih vrstic; priznava, da je to večinoma posledica dejstva, da je bila druga sprememba proračuna za leto 2012, povezana z večjimi zahtevami jeseni 2012, odobrena šele oktobra 2012; zato meni, da so bile te prerazporeditve nujne in upravičene;
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2] (‘the Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 185 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime [4], and in particular Article 36 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem letnem revizijskem poročilu za leto 2012 odkrilo pomanjkljivosti v postopkih zaposlovanja agencije, ki vplivajo na preglednost in enako obravnavo kandidatov, in sicer to, da so bila vprašanja za pisna preverjanja in pogovore s kandidati določena, ko je izbirna komisija že preučila prošnje, in da izbirna komisija ni dokumentirala vseh svojih sestankov in odločitev;
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police Office for the financial year 2012
ugotavlja, da je agencija uvedla številne ukrepe za upravljanje primerov navzkrižij interesov ter njihovo preprečevanje in je razvila podroben disciplinski postopek; poziva agencijo, naj navede, ali je pripravila posebno politiko za preprečevanje in upravljanje navzkrižij interesov na podlagi smernic Komisije;
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Police Office for the financial year 2012,
ugotavlja, da življenjepisi in izjave o interesih članov upravnega odbora ter izjave o interesih izvršnega direktorja in najvišjih vodstvenih delavcev niso objavljeni; poziva agencijo, naj to nepravilnost nemudoma odpravi;
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Police Office for the financial year 2012, together with the Office’s replies [1],having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 (05849/2014 – C7-0054/2014),
obžaluje, da je bil popis sredstev agencije na podlagi ugotovitev Računskega sodišča nepopoln in ni zajel vseh sredstev v njeni lasti ter da niso bila upoštevana sredstva v izgradnji in sredstva, pridobljena proti koncu leta; obžaluje tudi, da ni bilo nobenega postopka za odtujitev osnovnih sredstev; je seznanjen s trditvami agencije, da je bil pripravljen popoln popis sredstev, ki vključuje odpisana opredmetena osnovna sredstva;
having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol) [4], and in particular Article 43 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
je seznanjen z navedbami agencije, da je Služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo (IAS) leta 2012 izvedla oceno tveganj, na podlagi katere je nastal strateški revizijski načrt za obdobje 2013–2015, ki navaja prihodnje revizijske vsebine;
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on the Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0179/2014),
ugotavlja, da je IAS izvedla tudi preverjanje svojih predhodnih revizijskih priporočil agenciji in odkrila, da sta primera dveh zelo pomembnih priporočil zaključena; ugotavlja, da bo akcijski načrt, ki ga je pripravila agencija, da bi obravnavala preostala nezaključena priporočila, po mnenju IAS ublažil tveganja, če bo izveden pravočasno;
A. whereas, according to its financial statements, the final budget of the European Police Office (‘Europol’) for the financial year 2012 was EUR 84152000, representing a decrease of 0,73 % compared to 2011,
zahteva, da agencija na dostopen način, predvsem prek spletnega mesta, sporoča rezultate svojega dela in učinke za evropske državljane.
B. whereas the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Office’s annual accounts for the financial year 2012 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular,
UL C 365, 13.12.2013, str.
Notes with concern that the Office carried over EUR 1200000 for changes to its premises in connection with the setting up of the European Cybercrime Centre; notes that although the Office agreed upon those changes with the host state in July 2012, the contract for the works required was only signed in April 2013; notes, in addition, that the Office carried over EUR 100000 related to the introduction of a new human resources system; expresses concern that both of those carry-overs did not correspond to legal commitments made at the end of the year and were thus irregular; calls on the Office to take steps in order to prevent similar situations in the future and to report on this within the framework of the 2012 discharge follow-up;
251.
Notes the action — most of which is still ongoing- taken as a result of comments made by the Court of Auditors in respect of the 2011 financial year regarding the lack of procedures for exceptions; notes that the accounting system had not yet been fully validated;
UL L 349, 25.11.2004, str.
Notes the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the Europol Pension Fund [7] for the financial year 2012, together with the Fund’s replies; calls on the Office to notify it of any decision on the future of the Fund;
1.