natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hence, the Authority was concerned that competition in connectivity to Iceland would be eliminated, as only one supplier would remain on the market.
Zato je Nadzorni organ dvomil, da bi bila konkurenca pri povezljivosti z Islandijo izločena, saj bi na trgu ostal le en ponudnik.
These concerns have now been dispelled.
Ti pomisleki so zdaj odpravljeni.
The Farice project is pro-competitive in creating a new channel for international connectivity where previously there has only been the CANTAT-3 offer.
Projekt Farice je naklonjen konkurenci pri oblikovanju novega kanala za mednarodno povezljivost, medtem ko je prej obstajala samo ponudba CANTAT-3.
Moreover, as a result of Farice hf.’s prices, which are high in comparison to international prices, buyers of wholesale capacity in Iceland, other than Farice’s founders, have tended to use CANTAT-3 capacity, which Teleglobe offers at lower prices.
Poleg tega so se zaradi cen Farice hf., ki so v primerjavi z mednarodnimi cenami visoke, kupci veleprodajne zmogljivosti na Islandiji, ki niso ustanovitelji Farice, nagibali k uporabi zmogljivosti CANTAT-3, ki jo Teleglobe nudi po nižjih cenah.
This shows that Farice does not appear to be able to control prices or supply in the market for international connectivity from/to Iceland under the present market conditions.
Zato se zdi, da družba Farice ne bi mogla nadzorovati cen ali ponudbe na trgu mednarodne povezljivosti iz Islandije oziroma v Islandijo pod trenutnimi tržnimi pogoji.
The Icelandic authorities estimate that currently Teleglobe is selling capacity to Icelandic customers that amounts to about 50 % of the volume channelled through Farice.
Islandski organi ocenjujejo, da Teleglobe islandskim strankam trenutno prodaja zmogljivost, ki znaša približno 50 % obsega, speljanega prek Farice.
It does not appear that Farice hf.’s pricing policy undercuts CANTAT-3 prices and is able to drive that competitor out of the market.
Ni videti, da bi politika oblikovanja cen družbe Farice hf. nelojalno nižala cene CANTAT-3 in bila zmožna potisniti tega konkurenta s trga.
Wholesale customers that are not affiliated with Farice hf.’s founders are able to bypass the Farice cable and have in fact done so.
Veleprodajne stranke, ki niso povezane z ustanovitelji Farice hf., lahko obidejo kabel družbe Farice, kar so dejansko tudi storile.
The Icelandic authorities also reacted to the concerns voiced in the decision to open the formal investigation procedure that Farice hf. originally had plans for joint purchase/lease of increased bandwidth in CANTAT-3 in order to ring-connect the two systems.
Islandski organi so se odzvali tudi na pomisleke iz odločbe o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave, da je Farice hf. prvotno načrtoval skupni nakup/zakup povečane pasovne širine v CANTAT-3, da bi krožno povezal oba sistema.
Such comprehensive purchases of available capacity would effectively have removed Teleglobe as a competitor to Farice.
Taki obsežni nakupi razpoložljive zmogljivosti bi dejansko odstranili družbo Teleglobe kot tekmico družbe Farice.
The Icelandic authorities stated that Farice hf. or E-Farice ehf. do not currently have any plans to purchase or lease more CANTAT-3 capacity and that discussions held with Teleglobe [60] years ago never led to any agreement.
Islandski organi so navedli, da Farice hf. oziroma E-Farice ehf. trenutno ne načrtuje nakupa ali zakupa večje zmogljivosti CANTAT-3 in da pogovori z družbo Teleglobe [60], ki so potekali pred leti, niso pripeljali do nobenega sporazuma.
The situation of today is that both Farice and CANTAT-3 capacity is available to and from Iceland.
Danes sta zmogljivost Farice in tudi zmogljivost CANTAT-3 na voljo v Islandijo in iz nje.
In addition, there are other operators, such as TDC and T-Systems which provide capacity on CANTAT-3 to Iceland, although on a smaller scale.
Poleg tega obstajajo drugi operaterji, kot sta TDC in T-Systems, ki Islandiji nudijo zmogljivost na CANTAT-3, čeprav v manjšem obsegu.
Therefore, in the current situation, there are no grounds for the Authority to be concerned about the competition aspects and the corresponding competition proceedings have been closed.
Zato v trenutnem položaju ni razloga, da bi bil Nadzorni organ zaskrbljen glede vidikov konkurence, in ustrezni postopek na področju konkurence je zaključen.
On the basis of the foregoing assessment, the Authority considers that the support in favour of Farice hf. is compatible with the EEA Agreement.
Na podlagi zgornje ocene Nadzorni organ meni, da je podpora za Farice hf. združljiva s Sporazumom o EGP.
Notwithstanding this, the Authority regrets that the measures were implemented before Iceland had notified the Authority of the State guarantee and before the Authority had reached a final decision on the State aid assessment of the measures,
Ne glede na to Nadzorni organ obžaluje, da so bili ukrepi izvedeni, preden je Islandija Nadzorni organ obvestila o državnem jamstvu in preden je Nadzorni organ sprejel končno odločitev o oceni ukrepov državne pomoči –
The support in favour of Farice hf. in form of a State guarantee for a loan and a capital increase constitute State aid which is compatible with the functioning of the EEA Agreement within the meaning of Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement.
Podpora za Farice hf. v obliki državnega jamstva za posojilo in kapitalskega povečanja pomeni državno pomoč, ki je združljiva z delovanjem Sporazuma o EGP v smislu člena 61(3)(c) Sporazuma o EGP.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Iceland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Republiko Islandijo.
Only the English version is authentic.
Verodostojna je le angleška različica.
Hereinafter referred to as the Authority.
V nadaljnjem besedilu „Nadzorni organ“.
Hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement.
V nadaljnjem besedilu „Sporazum o EGP“.
Published in OJ C 277, 10.11.2005, and the EEA Supplement No 56 of 10 November 2005.
Objavljena v UL C 277, 10.11.2005, in Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu EU št. 56, 10.11.2005, str. 14.
For more detailed information on the various correspondence between the Authority and the Authority, reference is made to the Authority’s Decision to open the formal investigation procedure, Decision No 125/05/COL, published in OJ C 277, 10.11.2005, p. 14.
Za podrobnejše informacije o različni korespondenci med Nadzornim organom in islandskimi organi velja sklicevanje na Odločbo Nadzornega organa o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave, Odločba št. 125/05/COL, objavljena v UL C 277, 10.11.2005, str. 14.
OJ C 277, 10.11.2005, p. 14, and EEA Supplement No 56 of 10.11.2005, p. 14.
UL C 277, 10.11.2005, in Dopolnilo EGP k Uradnemu listu EU št. 56, 10.11.2005, str. 14.
In accordance with the provisions of Protocol 21 to the EEA Agreement and Article 11 of Chapter II, Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
V skladu z določbami Protokola 21 k Sporazumu o EGP in členom 11 poglavja II Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
The consortium included inter alia the Icelandic telecom operator Landssími Íslands hf., Teleglobe and Deutsche Telekom.
Konzorcij je med drugim vključeval islandskega telekomunikacijskega operaterja Landssími Íslands hf., Teleglobe in Deutsche Telekom.
The Icelandic State’s stake in Síminn was sold to Skipti ehf. effective August 2005.
Delež islandske države v Síminn je bil prodan družbi Skipti ehf. z začetkom veljavnosti avgusta 2005.
See Summary Report, provided as annex 1 to the notification.
Glej zbirno poročilo v prilogi 1 k priglasitvi.
See also the following comment by the Icelandic authorities: ‘Although the designated universal service provider, and as such required to provide secure long-distance communication, Síminn felt that increasing the capacity to meet demand, as well as providing an alternative route for emergencies, was a financially risky undertaking, providing little return on investment.
Glej tudi naslednjo pripombo islandskih organov: „Čeprav je bil Síminn imenovan za univerzalnega izvajalca storitev in se je zato od njega zahtevalo, da zagotovi varno komunikacijo na daljavo, so v družbi menili, da sta bila povečanje zmogljivosti za zadostitev povpraševanju in zagotavljanje alternativne poti za nujne primere finančno tvegano početje z nizkim donosom naložbe.
In order to facilitate the necessary upgrade in capacity, particularly in view of the short time frame available until capacity would be outstripped by demand, the government stepped in.’
Da bi pospešila potrebno nadgradnjo zmogljivosti, zlasti glede na kratek razpoložljiv čas, preden bi povpraševanje preseglo zmogljivost, je v projekt posegla vlada.“
In 2003, E-Farice ehf. held 80 % of the shares in Farice hf., with the 20 % remaining shares held by Føroya Tele (19,93 %) and other Faeroe parties (together 0,6 %).
Leta 2003 je imela družba E-Farice ehf. 80 % delnic v Farice hf., 20 % preostalih delnic pa so imeli Føroya Tele (19,93 %) in drugi udeleženci s Ferskih otokov (skupaj 0,6 %).
The IBM report is a report submitted by the Icelandic authorities, which gives a summary on the background and current status of the Farice project.
Poročilo IBM so predložili islandski organi, povzema pa ozadje in trenutno stanje projekta Farice.
It describes the project idea, the business plan and the network structure as well as the need for a new cable.
Opisuje zamisel projekta, poslovni načrt, strukturo omrežja in potrebo po novem kablu.
The IBM report stresses the business possibility that E-Farice’s purchase of CANTAT-3 connectivity provides the possibility to ring-connect the two cable systems in such a way that Farice hf. can offer its customers secured connectivity.
Poročilo IBM poudarja poslovno priložnost, da nakup povezljivosti CANTAT-3 s strani E-Farice zagotovi možnost krožne povezave dveh kabelskih sistemov, tako da lahko Farice hf. svojim strankam ponudi zavarovano povezljivost.
The report further describes negotiations of E-Farice with Teleglobe to lease additional CANTAT-3 capacity.
Poročilo nadalje opisuje pogajanja E-Farice s Teleglobe za zakup dodatne zmogljivosti CANTAT-3.
It has been discussed whether Farice hf. or E-Farice should lease all available capacity to Iceland and the Faeroe Islands.
Razpravljali so o tem, ali naj Farice hf. ali E-Farice vzame v zakup vse razpoložljive zmogljivosti na Islandiji in Ferskih otokih.
Initial capital contributions, which were later changed.
Začetni kapitalski vložki, ki so bili pozneje spremenjeni.
The holding company E-Farice holds all the shares of the Icelandic parties in Farice hf.
Holdinška družba E-Farice ima v lasti vse deleže islandskih strank v Farice hf.
The term backhaul often refers to transmitting from a remote site or network to a central or main site.
Izraz pripetje (backhaul) se pogosto nanaša na prenos z oddaljene lokacije ali mreže na osrednjo ali glavno lokacijo.
The original definition of backhaul was to transmit a telephone call or data beyond its normal destination point and then back again in order to utilise available personnel (operators, agents, etc.) or network equipment that is not located at the destination location.
Izvirna definicija pripetja je pomenila prenos telefonskega klica ali podatkov zunaj njegove običajne destinacije in nazaj, da bi izkoristili razpoložljivo osebje (operaterje, posrednike itd.) ali omrežno opremo, ki je ni na destinaciji.
The term has evolved into a more generic meaning.
Izraz se je sčasoma začel uporabljati v splošnejšem pomenu.
It typically implies a high-capacity line.
Navadno pomeni povezavo visoke zmogljivosti.
Although in the letter accompanying the notification reference is made to Libor as the basis for establishing the rate of interest to the loan for each tranche, clause 7.1 of the loan agreement refers to Euribor.
Čeprav je v dopisu, ki spremlja priglasitev, kot podlaga za določitev obrestne stopnje za posojilo za vsako tranšo določen Libor, se klavzula 7.1 posojilnega sporazuma nanaša na Euribor.
For this reason, the Authority considers the Euribor rate to be the valid reference for the determination of the rate of interest applicable to the loan for each interest period.
Zato Nadzorni organ meni, da Euribor velja kot veljavno sklicevanje za določitev obrestne stopnje, ki se uporablja za posojilo za vsako obrestno obdobje.
See letter of the Icelandic authorities dated 8 June 2004, page 7.
Glej dopis islandskih organov z dne 8. junija 2004, stran 7.
As the Icelandic authorities did not use the same conversion rate throughout the table, the Authority has modified the table submitted by the Icelandic authorities, as far as the euro figures are concerned.
Ker islandski organi niso uporabili istega menjalnega tečaja po celotni tabeli, je Nadzorni organ spremenil tabelo (vrednosti v eurih), ki so jo predložili islandski organi.
It calculated the euro figures in the table according to its conversion rates published on its webpage http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/dbaFile791.html.
Vrednosti v eurih je izračunal v skladu z menjalnimi tečaji, objavljenimi na njegovi spletni strani http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/dbaFile791.html.
As the B Term Loan is provided by two different lenders.
Ker terminsko posojilo B zagotavljata dva različna posojilodajalca.
According to the Security Document of the loan agreement a first ranking security into land and assets is registered for the amount of EUR 34,5 million.
V skladu z dokumentom o zavarovanju posojilnega sporazuma se najvišje zavarovanje za zemljišče in premoženje vpiše v znesku 34,5 milijona EUR.
The provisions of the loan agreement foresee the possibility of prepaying the whole or part of the loan, except for the A term Loan, without any prepayment fee.
Določbe posojilnega sporazuma predvidevajo možnost predčasnega odplačila celotnega posojila ali njegovega dela, z izjemo terminskega posojila A, brez kakršne koli pristojbine za predčasno odplačilo.
See the letter of the Icelandic authorities dated 21 January 2005, page 9.
Glej dopis islandskih organov z dne 21. januarja 2005, stran 9.
See page 11 of the Authority’s Decision No 125/05/COL.
Glej stran 11 Odločbe Nadzornega organa št. 125/05/COL.
The Icelandic authorities do not consider this aspect, but look at the adequacy of the market price as such.
Islandski organi ne upoštevajo tega vidika, temveč jih zanima primernost tržne cene kot take.
The result is that the fact that the State guarantee has led to better loan conditions than market conditions, is neither considered under the second condition (see above) nor under the fourth condition.
Zaradi tega dejstvo, da je državno jamstvo pripeljalo do boljših posojilnih pogojev, kot veljajo na trgu, ni upoštevano niti pod drugim (glej zgoraj) niti pod četrtim pogojem.
As this is depending on the future negotiations, the Authority is not in a position to assess whether such a modified margin would constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement or whether any possible aid could be authorised.
Ker je to odvisno od prihodnjih pogajanj, Nadzorni organ ne more oceniti, ali bo tak spremenjeni pribitek pomenil državno pomoč v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma o EGP oziroma ali bi lahko odobrili kakršno koli morebitno pomoč.
However, the Icelandic authorities would be able to identify the existence of an aid element for any future modification by applying the calculation parameters laid down in the previous paragraph and, in case of the existence of an aid element, would have to notify the aid measure to the Authority.
Vendar pa bi islandski organi lahko ugotovili obstoj elementa pomoči za katere koli prihodnje spremembe, tako da bi uporabili parametre za izračun, določene v prejšnjem odstavku, in bi morali, v primeru obstoja elementa pomoči, priglasiti ukrep pomoči Nadzornemu organu.
Euribor + 1,50 % p.a.–(Euribor+0,18 % p.a.)–0,50 % = 0,82 %.
Euribor + 1,50 % letno – (Euribor + 0,18 % letno) – 0,50 % = 0,82 %.
Based on the following calculation: EUR 438839/0,5 × 0,82 = EUR 719695.
Na podlagi naslednjega izračuna: 438839 EUR/0,5 × 0,82 = 719695 EUR.
Euribor + 2,30 % p.a.–(Euribor+0,18 % p.a.)–0,50 % = 1,62 %.
Euribor + 2,30 % letno – (Euribor + 0,18 % letno) – 0,50 % = 1,62 %.
2,30 – 0,18 (the interest rate of the A Term Loan).
2,30 – 0,18 (obrestna mera terminskega posojila A).
Communication of 13.2.2001, COM(2001) 35 final.
Sporočilo z dne 13.2.2001, COM(2001) 35 konč.
Commission Decision N 527/02 — Greece Financial support of a private company for the design, construction, testing and commissioning of the aviation fuel pipelines for supply of the new Athens International Airport.
Odločba Komisije N 527/02 – Grčija, Finančna podpora zasebne družbe za načrt, gradnjo, preizkus in začetek obratovanja cevovodov za letalsko gorivo za oskrbo novega mednarodnega letališča v Atenah.
See Commission Decision C 67-69/2003 concerning aid for the construction of a propylene pipeline between Rotterdam, Antwerp and the Ruhr-area, paragraph 48.
Glej Odločbo Komisije C 67-69/2003 o pomoči za gradnjo propilenskega cevovoda med Rotterdamom, Antwerpnom in Porurjem, odstavek 48.
The argument by the Icelandic authorities that Directive 2002/20/EC only requires a general authorisation (and not a tender) is valid, but not relevant for State aid purposes.
Argument islandskih organov, da Direktiva 2002/20/ES zahteva le splošno odobritev (in ne razpisa), velja, vendar ni pomemben za namene državne pomoči.
Under the State aid provisions, the carrying out of a tender is one of the elements to assess whether a measure can be classified as infrastructure.
Po določbah o državni pomoči je izvedba razpisa eden od elementov za oceno, ali je ukrep mogoče opredeliti kot infrastrukturo.
See Commission Decision N 527/02 — Greece — Financial support of a private company for the design, construction, testing and commissioning of the aviation fuel pipelines for supply of the new Athens International Airport.
Glej Odločbo Komisije N 527/02 – Grčija, Finančna podpora zasebne družbe za načrt, gradnjo, preizkus in začetek obratovanja cevovodov za letalsko gorivo za oskrbo novega mednarodnega letališča v Atenah.
Also Commission Decision N 860/01 — Austria on the ski resort Mutterer Alm where the running of ski lifts was considered to be an economic activity benefiting the operator of the ski lift and therefore not constituting an infrastructure measure.
Tudi Odločbo Komisije N 860/01 – Avstrija, Smučarsko središče Mutterer Alm, kjer je upravljanje žičnic veljalo za gospodarsko dejavnost, ki prinaša prednosti upravitelju žičnic in tako ne pomeni infrastrukturnega ukrepa.
See Commission Decision C 67-69/2003, paragraph 48.
Glej Odločbo Komisije C 67-69/2003, odstavek 48.
See Case T-128/98 Aéroports de Paris v European Commission [2000] ECR II-3929.
Glej zadevo T-128/98, Aéroports de Paris proti European Commission, Recueil 2000, str. II-3929.
See Commission Decision N 213/2003 — Project Atlas, broadband infrastructure for business parks.
Glej Odločbo Komisije N 213/2003 – Projekt Atlas, širokopasovna infrastruktura za poslovne centre.
See Section I.2.2(b) of this Decision.
Glej oddelek I.2.2(b) te odločbe.
See letter by the Icelandic authorities dated 25 June 2004, page 3.
Glej dopis islandskih organov z dne 25. junija 2004, stran 3.
The latter point has never been denied by the Authority; the question whether the share increase by the State is proportionate is, however, not answered.
Nadzorni organ zadnje točke nikoli ni zanikal, vendar pa ostaja vprašanje, ali je povečanje deleža države sorazmerno, brez odgovora.
Press release of 3 February 2004.
Sporočilo za javnost z dne 3. februarja 2004.
The Icelandic authorities have not provided information which enables the Authority to make an assessment under that provision.
Islandski organi niso predložili informacij, ki bi Nadzornemu organu omogočile oceno po tej določbi.
See e.g. State aid N 576/98 United Kingdom concerning the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, where the high speed rail link was a link of EU wide importance, rather than being relevant for one or a few Member States.
Glej npr. Državna pomoč N 576/98 Združeno kraljestvo, Železniška povezava po kanalskem predoru, kjer je bila povezava hitre železnice pomembna za celotno EU in ne le za eno ali nekaj držav članic.
For this criterion, see e.g. Commission Decision 96/369/EC concerning fiscal aid given to German airlines in the form of a depreciation facility (OJ L 146, 20.6.1996, p. 42).
Za to merilo glej npr. Odločbo Komisije 96/369/ES o davčni pomoči nemškim letalskim družbam v obliki amortizacijskih sredstev (UL L 146, 20.6.1996, str. 42).
As stated in the summary report submitted by the Icelandic authorities in the notification dated 27 February 2004, the consortium member Teleglobe, in particular, was faced with business difficulties.
Kot je bilo navedeno v zbirnem poročilu, ki so ga v priglasitvi z dne 27. februarja 2004 predložili islandski organi, se je s poslovnimi težavami spopadal predvsem Teleglobe, ki je bil član konzorcija.
Data transmission in which a single medium can carry several channels at once.
Prenos podatkov, kjer lahko en sam medij nosi več kanalov hkrati.
The term is also used to compare frequency bandwidth greater than 3 MHz narrowband frequencies.
Izraz se uporablja tudi za primerjavo frekvenčne pasovne širine, ki je večja od ozkopasovnih frekvenc 3 MHz.
Broadband can transmit more data at a higher speed.
Široki pas lahko z večjo hitrostjo prenese več podatkov.
See e-Europe 2004 Action Plan, Communication from the Commission, An information society for all, COM(2002) 263 final of 28 May 2002, see Commission Decision N 213/2003 Project Atlas — broadband infrastructure for business parks and N 307/2004 Broadband in Scotland — remote and rural areas.
Glej Akcijski načrt za e-Evropo 2004, Sporočilo Komisije, Informacijska družba za vse, 28.5.2002, COM(2002) 263 konč., glej Odločbo Komisije N 213/2003 – Projekt Atlas, širokopasovna infrastruktura za poslovne centre, in N 307/2004 – Široki pas na Škotskem, oddaljena in podeželska območja.
The Icelandic authorities state: ‘Widespread participation was sought in Iceland and the Faeroe Islands for shareholders in the Farice project and all telecoms operators were invited to participate in the foundation of the company.’
Islandski organi navajajo: „Na Islandiji in Ferskih otokih smo si prizadevali za široko udeležbo delničarjev v projektu Farice in vsi telekomunikacijski operaterji so bili povabljeni k sodelovanju pri ustanovitvi družbe.“
Commission Decisions N 307/2004, N 199/2004 and N 213/2003.
Odločba Komisije N 307/2004, N 199/2004 in N 213/2003.
See letter of the Icelandic authorities dated 28 June 2006, page 5.
Glej dopis islandskih organov z dne 28. junija 2006, stran 5.
See point 17.3 of Chapter 17 of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines, which states that in certain situations the value of the guarantee might be as high as the amount effectively covered by that guarantee.
Glej točko 17.3 poglavja 17 Smernic Nadzornega organa o državni pomoči, ki navaja, da je v nekaterih primerih vrednost jamstva lahko tako visoka kot znesek, ki ga dejansko krije to jamstvo.
Aid intensities of 35 % of total investment costs have e.g. been authorised by the European Commission in State aid N 188/2006 — Latvia, for a broadband project in rural areas.
Intenzivnosti pomoči, ki znašajo 35 % skupnih investicijskih stroškov, je Evropska komisija npr. odobrila v Državni pomoči N 188/2006 – Latvija, Širokopasovni projekt na podeželskih območjih.
Cf. Case C-225/91 Matra SA v Commission [1993] ECR-3203, paragraph 41, EFTA Court judgment in Case E-09/04 The Bankers’ and Securities’ Dealers Association of Iceland v EFTA Surveillance Authority, not yet published, paragraph 82.
Glej zadevo C-225/91, Matra SA proti Komisiji, Recueil 1993, str. 3203, odstavek 41, sodba Sodišča EFTA v zadevi E-09/04, Združenje bankirjev in trgovcev z vrednostnimi papirji na Islandiji proti Nadzornemu organu EFTA, še ni objavljeno, odstavek 82.