natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Application of these guidelines
Uporaba Smernic
In accordance with the Athority’s notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful state aid, the Authority will apply the principles set out in these guidelines to non-notified aid granted after 31 December 2011.
V skladu z obvestilom Nadzornega organa o določitvi pravil, ki se uporabljajo za ocenjevanje nezakonite državne pomoči, bo Nadzorni organ načela iz teh smernic uporabil v primeru nepriglašene pomoči, ki je bila dodeljena po 31. decembru 2011.
These Guidelines correspond to the Commissions Framework on State Aid to Shipbuilding, OJ C 364, 14.12.2011, p. 9
Te smernice so v skladu z Okvirom Komisije za državno pomoč ladjedelništvu, UL C 364, 14.12.2011, str. 9.
OJ C 221, 14.9.2006, p. 10, EEA Supplement No 46, 14.9.2006, p. 1.
UL C 221, 14.9.2006, str. 10, Dopolnilo EGP št. 46, 14.9.2006, str. 1.
OJ L 54, 28.2.2008, p. 1, EEA Supplement No 11, 28.2.2008, p. 1.
UL L 54, 28.2.2008, str. 1, Dopolnilo EGP št. 11, 28.2.2008, str. 1.
For instance, the Guidelines on state aid for environmental protection (OJ L 144, 10.6.2010, p. 1) lay down the conditions under which aid to shipyards for more environmentally friendly production may be authorised.
Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja (UL L 144, 10.6.2010, str. 1) na primer določajo pogoje, pod katerimi se lahko odobri pomoč ladjedelnicam za okolju prijaznejšo proizvodnjo.
Moreover, aid for the acquisition of new transport vehicles which go beyond Community standards or which increase the level of environmental protection in the absence of Community standards can be granted to ship owners, thus contributing overall to cleaner maritime transport.
Poleg tega se lahko pomoč za nakup novih prevoznih sredstev, ki presegajo standarde Skupnosti ali povečujejo stopnjo varstva okolja v odsotnosti standardov Skupnosti, dodeli lastnikom ladij in tako prispeva k okolju prijaznejšemu pomorskemu prometu.
OJ L 305, 19.11.2009, p. 1, EEA Supplement No 60, 19.11.2009, p. 1.
UL L 305, 19.11.2009, str. 1, Dopolnilo EGP št. 60, 19.11.2009, str. 1.
Gross tons.
Bruto tone.
Reference is made to point 15 of the Guidelines on national regional aid 2007-2013 according to which currently, “no region in the EFTA States qualifies for the Article 61(3)(a) derogation.”
Sklicevanje na točko 15 Smernic o državni regionalni pomoči za obdobje 2007–2013, v skladu s katero trenutno „nobena regija držav Efte ne izpolnjuje pogojev za odstopanje v skladu s členom 61(3)(a).“
The environmental aid guidelines adopted in July 2008 refer to the expression “Community standards”.
Smernice o okoljski pomoči, ki so bile sprejete julija 2008, vsebujejo izraz „standardi Skupnosti“.
Except for costs for feasibility studies undertaken within 12 months prior to the aid application for an innovative process.
Razen stroškov za študije izvedljivosti, ki so bile opravljene v 12 mesecih pred vlogo za pridobitev pomoči za inovativni postopek.
This does not exclude that the potential beneficiary may have already carried out feasibility studies which are not covered by the request for State aid.
S tem se ne izključuje možnosti, da je potencialni upravičenec morda že opravil študije izvedljivosti, ki niso zajete v vlogi za državno pomoč.
OJ L 340, 22.12.2010, p. 1, EEA Supplement No 72, 22.12.2010, p. 1.
UL L 340, 22.12.2010, str. 1, Dopolnilo EGP št. 72, 22.12.2010, str. 1.
The Authority intends to apply the principles set out in these guidelines until 31 December 2013.
Nadzorni organ bo načela iz teh smernic uporabljal do 31. decembra 2013.
After that date the Authority envisages including the provisions on innovation aid in the guidelines for state aid for research and development and innovation [5] and integrating regional aid for shipbuilding into the Guidelines on national regional aid.
Po tem datumu Nadzorni organ predvideva vključitev določb o pomoči za inovacije v Smernice o državni pomoči za raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije [5] in vključitev regionalne pomoči ladjedelništvu v Smernice o državni regionalni pomoči.
The Authority will apply the principles set out in these guidelines until 31 December 2013.
Nadzorni organ bo načela iz teh smernic uporabljal do 31. decembra 2013.
The Authority will apply those principles to all notified aid measures in respect of which it is called upon to take a decision after 1 February 2012, even where the projects were notified prior to that date.
Nadzorni organ bo ta načela uporabljal za vse priglašene ukrepe pomoči, glede katerih bo moral odločiti po 1. februarju 2012, tudi če so bili projekti priglašeni pred tem datumom.
No 90/12/COL
št. 90/12/COL
on the sale of certain buildings at the Inner Camp at Haslemoen Leir (Norway)
o prodaji nekaterih zgradb na ograjenem notranjem delu oporišča Haslemoen Leir (Norveška)
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), in particular to Article 61 and Protocol 26,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) ter zlasti člena 61 Sporazuma in Protokola 26 k Sporazumu,
Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (“the Surveillance and Court Agreement”), in particular to Article 24,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi Nadzornega organa in Sodišča (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču) in zlasti člena 24 Sporazuma,
Having regard to Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement (“Protocol 3”), in particular to Article 1(2) of Part I and Articles 7(5) and 14 of Part II,
ob upoštevanju Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol 3) in zlasti člena 1(2) dela I ter člena 7(5) in člena 14 dela II Protokola,
On the basis of a complaint and various exchange of letters (Event Nos. 427226, 422506, 449988, 428521 and 458787), the Authority, by letter dated 24 March 2010 (Event No 549786), informed the Norwegian authorities that it had initiated the procedure laid down in Article 1(2) of Part I of Protocol 3 in respect of the sale of certain buildings at the Inner camp at Haslemoen Leir.
Na podlagi pritožbe in različnih izmenjav dopisov (dogodek št. 427226, 422506, 449988, 428521 in 458787) je Nadzorni organ z dopisom z dne 24. marca 2010 (dogodek št. 549786) obvestil norveške organe, da je začel postopek iz člena 1(2) dela I Protokola 3 v zvezi s prodajo nekaterih zgradb na ograjenem notranjem delu oporišča Haslemoen Leir.
The Authority’s Decision No 96/10/COL of 24 March 2010 to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement thereto [2].
Odločba Nadzornega organa št. 96/10/COL z dne 24. marca 2010 o začetku postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in v Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije [2].
The Norwegian authorities submitted their comments by letter dated 12 May 2010 and also by letter dated 19 November 2010 (Event No 557187 and Event No 581797).
Norveški organi so svoje pripombe predložili v dopisu z dne 12. maja 2010 in v dopisu z dne 19. novembra 2010 (dogodek št. 557187 in dogodek št. 581797).
There were no comments from third parties.
Tretje osebe niso predložile nobenih pripomb.
In 2001 the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget) decided that military properties that were no longer used for military purposes should be sold at market value [3].
Norveški parlament (Stortinget) je leta 2001 odločil, da bi bilo treba vojaške nepremičnine, ki se ne uporabljajo več za vojaške namene, prodati po tržni vrednosti [3].
The municipalities concerned were given a right of first refusal.
Zadevnim občinam je bila priznana predkupna pravica.
Haslemoen Leir was an army base since the 1950s and is composed of the following: (i) forest areas; (ii) cultivated area; (iii) housing area (also referred to as Storskjæret); and (iv) an area called the Inner Camp.
Haslemoen Leir je bila vojaška baza od petdesetih let 20. stoletja in obsega: (i) gozdna območja; (ii) obdelovalno površino; (iii) stanovanjsko območje (imenovano tudi Storskjæret); in (iv) območje, imenovano ograjeni notranji del oporišča.
The entire Inner Camp covers approximately 300000 m2 with 44 buildings [4] of more than 42000 m2.
Celoten ograjeni notranji del oporišča obsega približno 300000 m2 s 44 zgradbami [4] s površino več kot 42000 m2.
The buildings include inter alia barracks and service buildings for army activities such as kitchen facilities, movie theatre, officer’s mess, school and education facilities, training and mobilisation sections, storage buildings and garages.
Zgradbe med drugim vključujejo barake in vojaške zgradbe za vojaške dejavnosti, kot so kuhinjski objekti, kino, častniška menza, šola in izobraževalni objekti, oddelki za usposabljanje in mobilizacijo, skladišča in garaže.
Some of the old buildings are renovated and the military camp was, until it was closed, well preserved.
Nekatere od starih zgradb so obnovljene, vojaško oporišče pa je bilo do zaprtja dobro ohranjeno.
The sale of Haslemoen Leir from the Norwegian State to Våler municipality
Prodaja oporišča Haslemoen Leir s strani Norveške države občini Våler
When Haslemoen Leir was put on the market for sale in 2004, the Norwegian State commissioned an independent expert valuer, Agdestein Takst & Eiendomsrådgivning, to undertake a valuation of Haslemoen Leir [5].
Ko je bilo oporišče Haslemoen Leir leta 2004 dano na trg za prodajo, je Norveška država pooblastila neodvisnega strokovnega cenilca, tj. podjetje Agdestein Takst & Eiendomsrådgivning, da oceni vrednost oporišča Haslemoen Leir [5].
The Agdestein report dated 22 December 2004 (the first Agdestein report) concluded that the “investor value” [6] of the Inner Camp, including the 44 buildings, was NOK 39 million if the buildings would be sold separately.
V Agdesteinovem poročilu z dne 22. decembra 2004 (prvo Agdesteinovo poročilo) je bilo sklenjeno, da je „vrednost vlagatelja“ [6] ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča, vključno s 44 zgradbami, 39 milijonov NOK, če bi se zgradbe prodale ločeno.
If the Inner Camp would be sold as one unit the report held the “investor value” to be NOK 29 million.
Če bi se ograjeni notranji del oporišča prodal kot ena enota, je „vrednost vlagatelja“ glede na poročilo 29 milijonov NOK.
The report contained individual value assessments of most of the 44 buildings, including specifications and short descriptions of each of the buildings and their technical condition.
Poročilo je vključevalo ocene posameznih vrednosti za večino od 44 zgradb, vključno s specifikacijami in kratkimi opisi vsake posamezne zgradbe in njenega tehničnega stanja.
The NOK 10 million rebate is in subsequent reports and correspondence referred to as the 30 % rebate (or the approximately 30 % rebate).
Znižanje v vrednosti 10 milijonov NOK je v naslednjih poročilih in korespondenci navedeno kot 30-odstotno znižanje (ali približno 30-odstotno znižanje).
But the rebate which was granted for acquiring the Inner Camp as one unit is in fact closer to 25,64 % (NOK 10 million deduction of NOK 39 million = 25,641025 %).
Vendar je znižanje, ki je bilo priznano za nakup ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča kot ene enote, dejansko bližje 25,64 % (39 milijonov NOK, znižanih za 10 milijonov NOK = 25,641025 %).
The purchaser, Våler Municipality, engaged the independent valuers Erik Alhaug and Trond Bakke to assess the value of the Inner Camp and the housing area called Storskjæret.
Kupec, tj. občina Våler, je najel neodvisna cenilca Erika Alhauga in Tronda Bakka za oceno vrednosti ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča in stanovanjskega območja, imenovanega Storskjæret.
Their evaluation was also based on a sale of the Inner Camp as one unit.
Tudi njuna ocena je temeljila na prodaji ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča kot ene enote.
They calculated the investor value, i.e. expected market value based on future rental income from the buildings.
Izračunala sta vrednost vlagatelja, tj. pričakovano tržno vrednost na podlagi prihodnjih dohodkov od najemnine zgradb.
The report was relatively short, 4 pages and was not based on any physical inspection of the buildings but relied on existing reports and evaluations.
Poročilo je bilo razmeroma kratko, tj. 4 strani, in ni temeljilo na nobenem fizičnem pregledu zgradb, temveč se je zanašalo na obstoječa poročila in ocene.
The report took into account the necessary costs to upgrade the buildings to functional objects for rent.
V poročilu so se upoštevali stroški, potrebni za posodobitev zgradb v funkcionalne objekte za najem.
The report assumed that it would take time to rent out all the buildings given the geographic location of the buildings and limited population in Våler municipality.
V poročilu je bilo predvideno, da bo glede na geografski položaj zgradb in omejeno število prebivalcev občine Våler za oddajo vseh zgradb v najem potrebnega nekaj časa.
Some of the buildings were already rented out but on short term basis.
Nekatere zgradbe so se že oddajale v najem, vendar le kratkoročno.
The report moreover emphasised that several of the buildings including the barracks should be condemned as they were in technically poor condition.
Poleg tega je bilo v poročilu poudarjeno, da bi bilo treba več zgradb, vključno z barakami, razglasiti za nevarne, ker so v slabem tehničnem stanju.
As also many of the other buildings required significant refurbishment the report concluded that the likely future rental income would not even cover normal maintenance and operating costs.
Ker je bila tudi za veliko drugih zgradb potrebna precejšnja prenova, je bilo v poročilu sklenjeno, da verjetni prihodnji dohodki od najemnine ne bi pokrili niti običajnih stroškov vzdrževanja in operativnih stroškov.
Mr Alhaug and Mr Bakke’s conclusion, dated 18 January 2005 (the Alhaug/Bakke report) [7] was therefore that the Inner Camp valued as one unit on the basis of future rental income was 0 [8].
Zato sta cenilca Alhaug in Bakke 18. januarja 2005 (Alhaug/Bakkovo poročilo) [7] sklenila, da je vrednost ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča kot ene enote glede na prihodnje dohodke od najemnine nična [8].
In order to reconcile the findings in the first Agdestein report and the Alhaug/Bakke report and to reach a correct market price, the Norwegian State requested Agdestein Takst & Eiendomsrådgivning to make a second valuation report based on the two diverging value assessments.
Da bi se ugotovitve iz prvega Agdesteinovega poročila in Alhaug/Bakkovega poročila uskladile ter dosegla pravilna tržna cena, je Norveška država podjetju Agdestein Takst & Eiendomsrådgivning naročila, naj pripravi drugo poročilo o oceni na podlagi dveh različnih ocen vrednosti.
In the mandate laid down for this new assessment, Agdestein was requested to submit a “bridge value” of Haslemoen Leir.
V mandatu, določenem za to novo oceno, je Norveška država od podjetja Agdestein zahtevala, da predloži „premostitveno vrednost“ oporišča Haslemoen Leir.
The bridge value report of 3 March 2005 (the second Agdestein report) [9] explained that such a bridge value was just one of several approaches in order to find the value and that, alternatively, a neutral third party could have considered the estimated values in the two existing assessments.
V poročilu o premostitveni vrednosti z dne 3. marca 2005 (drugo Agdesteinovo poročilo) [9] je bilo pojasnjeno, da je ta premostitvena vrednost samo eden od pristopov za opredelitev vrednosti in da bi namesto tega nevtralna tretja oseba lahko upoštevala ocenjeni vrednosti iz dveh obstoječih ocen.
Based on the bridge value of the two prior assessments and with adjustments for some factual errors in the previous assessments, the market value of Haslemoen Leir was estimated at NOK 58 million.
Na podlagi premostitvene vrednosti dveh predhodnih ocen in s prilagoditvami v zvezi z nekaterimi vsebinskimi napakami v prejšnjih ocenah je bila tržna vrednost oporišča Haslemoen Leir ocenjena na 58 milijonov NOK.
However, the report anticipated that the market value of the military camp would be reduced by an additional NOK 12 million [10] if the whole camp, i.e. the four different areas, would be sold together.
Vendar je bilo v poročilu predvideno, da bi se tržna vrednost vojaškega oporišča zmanjšala za dodatnih 12 milijonov NOK [10], če bi se celotno oporišče, tj. štiri različna območja, prodalo kot ena enota.
As for the more specific value assessment of the Inner Camp, the bridge value was at the outset set at 14,5 million (NOK 29 million [11] + 0, divided by two) [12].
Kar zadeva natančnejšo oceno vrednosti ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča, je premostitvena vrednost na začetku znašala 14,5 milijona (29 milijonov NOK [11] + 0, deljeno z dva) [12].
This value was however adjusted upwards with NOK 1 million based on two additional adjustments, namely the value of the barracks and the value of some undeveloped land where future planning regulation was uncertain.
Vendar se je ta vrednost zvišala za 1 milijon NOK na podlagi dveh dodatnih prilagoditev, in sicer vrednosti barak in vrednosti nekaterih nerazvitih zemljišč, v zvezi s katerimi je bila prihodnja ureditev načrtovanja negotova.
Thus, the adjusted bridge value of the Inner Camp sold as one unit was NOK 15,5 million.
Tako je bila prilagojena premostitvena vrednost notranjega dela oporišča, prodanega kot ena enota, določena na 15,5 milijona NOK.
On the basis of the second Agdestein report the municipality took over the Haslemoen Leir 1 June 2005 for a price of NOK 46 million.
Na podlagi drugega Agdesteinovega poročila je občina 1. junija 2005 prevzela oporišče Haslemoen Leir po ceni 46 milijonov NOK.
Thus, the municipality was granted the two discounts mentioned above, the “approximately 30 % discount” [13] for acquiring the Inner Camp as one unit and the additional 20 % “quantity discount” for acquiring the whole Haslemoen Leir.
Tako sta bila občini priznana dva zgoraj navedena popusta, tj. „približno 30-odstotni popust“ [13] za nakup ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča kot ene enote in dodatni 20-odstotni „količinski popust“ za nakup celotnega oporišča Haslemoen Leir.
The sale by Våler municipality of parts of the Inner Camp to Haslemoen AS
Prodaja delov ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča podjetju Haslemoen AS s strani občine Våler
Våler Municipality had made it clear that it would sell Haslemoen Leir to the buyer that would develop the area in an appropriate manner and generate as many new jobs as possible.
Občina Våler je jasno navedla, da bo oporišče Haslemoen Leir prodala kupcu, ki bi območje ustrezno razvil in ustvaril čim več novih delovnih mest.
It has explained that while several parties took an interest in some of the buildings in the Inner Camp, it wanted to find a buyer that would ensure a uniform development and optimal utilisation of the Inner Camp.
Pojasnila je, da je več strank izrazilo interes za nekatere zgradbe v ograjenem notranjem delu oporišča, vendar želi kljub temu najti kupca, ki bi zagotovil enoten razvoj in optimalno izkoriščenost ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča.
In order to meet the municipality’s requirement, three different parties that each had shown an interest in parts of the Inner Camp, established a new company called Haslemoen AS [14].
Da bi izpolnile zahtevo občine, so tri različne stranke, od katerih je vsaka izrazila interes za dele ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča, ustanovile novo podjetje Haslemoen AS [14].
This company expressed its intention of utilizing the property for accommodation activities as well as for different cultural and sporting activities and events.
To podjetje je izrazilo namero, da bi nepremičnino uporabljalo za nastanitvene dejavnosti ter za različne kulturne in športne dejavnosti in dogodke.
Target groups were the army, security services providers and the car industry.
Ciljne skupine so bile vojska, ponudniki varnostnih storitev in avtomobilska industrija.
On 27 February 2006, the Municipal Council (Kommunestyret) approved the sale of 29 of the 44 buildings in the Inner Camp area to Haslemoen AS for a total sum of NOK 4 million.
Občinski svet (Kommunestyret) je 27. februarja 2006 odobril prodajo 29 od 44 zgradb na območju ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča podjetju Haslemoen AS za skupni znesek 4 milijonov NOK.
The buildings covered by the sale include accommodation buildings and barracks, mess halls for officers and soldiers with kitchen facilities, auditorium, movie theatre, school building, central heating, office building, a hospital ward and several garages.
Zgradbe, vključene v prodajo, so zajemale zgradbe za namestitev in barake, častniške in vojaške menze s kuhinjskimi objekti, avditorij, kino, šolsko zgradbo, objekte centralnega ogrevanja, pisarniško zgradbo, bolnišnični oddelek in več garaž.
It transpires from the preparatory documents to the Municipal Council meeting on 27 February 2006, that there was doubt about the value of the property and whether the sales price could entail state aid.
Iz pripravljalnih dokumentov za sejo občinskega sveta dne 27. februarja 2006 je razvidno, da je obstajal dvom glede vrednosti nepremičnine in glede tega, ali bi prodajna cena lahko pomenila državno pomoč.
The documents refer to a letter from a lawyer in the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional authorities (KS) received the same day.
Dokumenti se sklicujejo na dopis pravnika Norveške zveze lokalnih in regionalnih organov (KS), prejet istega dne.
The letter mentioned the EEA state aid rules and that a sale below market value could entail state aid.
V dopisu so bila navedena pravila o državni pomoči EGP in da bi prodaja pod tržno ceno lahko pomenila državno pomoč.
The letter moreover referred to that two bids, including the one from Haslemoen AS, covering most of the buildings of the Inner Camp, together were at NOK 6 million.
Dopis se je poleg tega skliceval na dejstvo, da sta dve ponudbi, vključno s ponudbo podjetja Haslemoen AS, ki je obsegala večino zgradb ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča, skupaj znašali 6 milijonov NOK.
After recalling the Authority’s guidelines for sale of land and the methods described therein to exclude state aid, the lawyer referred to the second Agdestein report in which the value of the Inner Camp at the outset was set at NOK 14,5 million.
Potem ko je opozoril na smernice Nadzornega organa za prodajo zemljišč in metode, opisane v smernicah, za izključitev državne pomoči, se je pravnik skliceval na drugo Agdesteinovo poročilo, v katerem je bila vrednost ograjenega notranjega dela oporišča na začetku ocenjena na 14,5 milijona NOK.
Compared to the bid at NOK 6 million the lawyer stated that to accept the bids received would entail a considerable risk of a sale below market value and thereby a breach of the state aid rules.
V primerjavi s ponudbo v višini 6 milijonov NOK je pravnik navedel, da bi sprejetje prejetih ponudb pomenilo precejšnje tveganje prodaje pod tržno ceno in s tem kršenje pravil o državni pomoči.
On that basis the lawyer recommended that a new value assessment should be carried out and that the Council should wait with adopting a decision to sell until such reassessment had been carried out.
Na podlagi tega je pravnik priporočil, da bi bilo treba izvesti novo oceno vrednosti in da naj svet ne sprejme odločitve o prodaji, dokler ne bo izvedena ta ponovna ocena.
On that basis the Chief municipal executive (Rådmannen) recommended to the Council to postpone the matter and await further clarifications.
Na podlagi tega je direktor občinske uprave (Rådmannen) občinskemu svetu priporočil, da zadevo odloži in počaka na nadaljnje pojasnitve.
The proposal was rejected by the majority of the Council (13 against 6), which approved the sale but stated that a proper risk assessment of potential competition concerns should be collected from the lawyers of the KS.
Predlog je zavrnila večina sveta (13 proti 6), ki je prodajo odobril, vendar je navedel, da bi bilo treba od pravnikov KS pridobiti ustrezno oceno tveganja v zvezi z morebitnimi pomisleki glede konkurence.
The Council moreover empowered the Executive committee of the Municipality (Formannskapet) to assess the risk [15].
Poleg tega je občinski svet pooblastil občinski izvršni odbor (Formannskapet) za izvedbo ocene tveganja [15].