natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Calls upon the Joint Undertaking to adopt comprehensive policies for the management of conflict of interest situations such as divestment of the interest by the public official, recusal of the public official from involvement in an affected decision-making process, restriction of access by the affected public official to particular information, rearrangement of the public official's duties or resignation of the public official from their office;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj sprejme celovito politiko za obvladovanje situacij v zvezi z navzkrižjem interesov, kot so: javni uradnik se odreče svojim interesom, javni uradnik se odreče udeležbi v spornem postopku odločanja, dostop javnega uradnika do določenih informacij je omejen, javnemu uradniku se dodelijo druge naloge ali pa odstopi s svojega položaja;
As the Joint Undertaking has merged in 2014, the discharge authority calls on the ECSEL Joint Undertaking not to perpetuate the lack of a policy on management of conflicts of interest;
glede na to, da se je skupno podjetje leta 2014 združilo v skupno podjetje ECSEL, kot organ za podelitev razrešnice slednje poziva, naj ne odlaša s sprejetjem pravilnika o navzkrižjih interesov;
Takes note that the Seventh Framework Programme Decision [2] establishes a monitoring and reporting system related to the protection, dissemination and transfer of research results; ascertains that the Joint Undertaking has developed in this regard procedures in order to monitor the protection and dissemination of their research results at different project stages; note with concern from the Court's report the further need of development in order to fully meet the provisions of the Decision;
je seznanjen, da sklep o sedmem okvirnem programu [2] vzpostavlja sistem spremljanja in poročanja, ki zajema varstvo, razširjanje in prenos rezultatov raziskav; potrjuje, da je skupno podjetje razvilo postopke za spremljanje varstva in razširjanja rezultatov raziskav v različnih fazah projekta; na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je treba to spremljanje še razviti, da bo v celoti ustrezalo določbam sklepa;
Acknowledges that between September 2012 and February 2013, the Commission's Second Interim Evaluation was carried out assessing the Joint Undertaking together with the ENIAC Joint Undertaking in terms of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and research quality; takes note that the report was issued in May 2013 and contained several recommendations for the Joint Undertaking; notes that these recommendations relate to the efficiency of project reviews, the improvement of the match of the project portfolio to strategic European aims and the appropriateness of the metrics for measuring the impact and success of its projects;
je seznanjen, da je Komisija med septembrom 2012 in februarjem 2013 izvedla drugo vmesno vrednotenje skupnih podjetij Artemis in ENIAC, ki je zajelo ustreznost, uspešnost, učinkovitost in kakovost raziskav; ugotavlja, da je bilo poročilo izdano maja 2013 in da je vsebovalo številna priporočila za skupno podjetje; opozarja, da se ta priporočila nanašajo na učinkovitost pregledov projektov, boljše ujemanje portfelja projektov s strateškimi cilji Unije ter ustrezna merila za merjenje učinka in uspeha projektov;
Article 7 of Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) (OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p. 6).
Člen 7 Sklepa št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str. 6).
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna skupnega podjetja ENIAC za proračunsko leto 2013
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja ENIAC za proračunsko leto 2013,
A. whereas the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (‘the Joint Undertaking’) was set up on 20 December 2007 for a period of 10 years to define and implement a ‘research agenda’ for the development of key competences for nanoelectronics across different application areas;
A. ker je bilo skupno podjetje ENIAC (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno 20. decembra 2007 za obdobje desetih let z namenom opredeliti in izvesti raziskovalni program za razvoj ključnih kompetenc za nanoelektroniko na različnih področjih uporabe;
B. whereas the Joint Undertaking was granted its financial autonomy in July 2010;
B. ker je skupno podjetje julija 2010 postalo finančno avtonomno;
C. whereas the founding members of the Joint Undertaking are the Union, represented by the Commission, Belgium, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the Association for European Nanoelectronics Activities (AENEAS);
C. ker so ustanovni člani skupnega podjetja Unija, ki jo zastopa Komisija, Belgija, Nemčija, Estonija, Irska, Grčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Nizozemska, Poljska, Portugalska, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo ter združenje za evropske dejavnosti na področju nanoelektronike (AENEAS);
D. whereas the maximum contribution for the period of 10 years from the Union to the Joint Undertaking is EUR 450000000, to be paid from the budget of the Seventh Research Framework Programme;
D. ker je najvišji prispevek Unije k skupnemu podjetju za obdobje desetih let 450000000 EUR, ki se izplača iz proračuna sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave;
E. whereas AENEAS is to make a maximum contribution of EUR 30000000 to the Joint Undertaking's running costs and the Member States are to make in-kind contributions to the running costs and to provide financial contributions of at least 1,8 times the Union contribution;
E. ker naj bi prispevek združenja AENEAS znašal največ 30000000 EUR za stroške poslovanja skupnega podjetja, države članice pa morajo zagotoviti stvarne prispevke za stroške poslovanja in finančne prispevke v višini najmanj 1,8-kratnega finančnega prispevka Unije;
F. whereas the ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings were merged to create the Electronic Components and Systems for European leadership Joint Technology Initiative (ECSEL JTI) which has started its activity in June 2014 and will run for 10 years;
F. ker sta bili skupni podjetji ENIAC in Artemis združeni zaradi ustanovitve skupne tehnološke pobude Elektronske komponente in sistemi za evropski vodilni položaj (STP ECSEL), ki je začela delovati junija 2014 in bo delovala deset let;
G. whereas the Court of Auditors report for the financial year 2013 has been produced on a going-concern principle;
G. ker je bilo poročilo Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2013 pripravljeno v skladu z načelom delujočega podjetja;
Notes that the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’), in its report on the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts for the financial year 2013 (‘the Court's report’), stated that the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2013 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year-end, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission's Accounting Officer;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu o letnih računovodskih izkazih skupnega podjetja za proračunsko leto 2013 navedlo, da slednji v vseh pomembnih pogledih pošteno predstavljajo njegov finančni položaj na dan 31. decembra 2013 ter njegov poslovni izid in denarne tokove za tedaj končano leto v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil in računovodskimi pravili, ki jih je sprejel računovodja Komisije;
Is deeply concerned that the Court issued a qualified opinion, for a third consecutive year, on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the annual accounts, on the grounds of not being able to conclude whether or not the ex post audit strategy, which relies heavily on the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) auditing project cost claims, provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions; considers that the qualified opinion put into question the willingness of the Joint Undertaking to be effective and efficient according to the principle of ‘value for money’; urges therefore the Joint Undertaking to report to the discharge authority on its strategy to change swiftly those current practices;
je zelo zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče že tretje leto zapored izdalo mnenje s pridržkom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, povezanih z letnimi računovodskimi izkazi, saj skupno podjetje ni moglo oceniti, ali strategija naknadnih revizij, ki je pri revidiranju zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov za projekte zelo odvisna od nacionalnih organov financiranja, dovolj zanesljivo zagotavlja zakonitost in pravilnost povezanih transakcij; meni, da se zaradi mnenja s pridržkom porajajo dvomi o pripravljenosti skupnega podjetja za uspešno in učinkovito delovanje v skladu z načelom stroškovne učinkovitosti; zato skupno podjetje poziva, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o strategiji za hitro spremembo sedanjega načina delovanja;
Notes that the Court considers the information available on the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's ex post audit strategy as insufficient for it to conclude whether this key control tool is functioning effectively; reiterates its call for the Court, through its independent audits, to provide the discharge authority with its own opinion on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts;
je seznanjen, da Računsko sodišče meni, da informacije, ki so na voljo o izvajanju strategije naknadnih revizij skupnega podjetja, ne zadoščajo za sklep o tem, ali ta ključna kontrola uspešno deluje; ponovno poziva Računsko sodišče, naj prek svojih neodvisnih revizij zagotovi organu za podelitev razrešnice svoje mnenje o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, povezanih z letnimi računovodskimi izkazi skupnega podjetja;
Recalls that the Joint Undertaking adopted an ex post audit strategy in 2010 and that its implementation started in 2011; notes that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the NFAs of the Member States; takes note that the Joint Undertaking's ex post audit strategy relies on the NFAs to audit project cost claims;
opozarja, da je skupno podjetje leta 2010 sprejelo strategijo naknadnih revizij in da se je slednja začela izvajati leta 2011; ugotavlja, da so za revizijo zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov projekta pooblaščeni nacionalni organi za financiranje držav članic; ugotavlja, da se strategija naknadnih revizij skupnega podjetja, kar zadeva revidiranje zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov projektov, zanaša na nacionalne organe financiranja;
Notes furthermore that the Joint Undertaking carried out a limited review of cost claims in 2012 that concluded that the error rate in the programme is below 2 %; notes the Court's opinion that the exercise did not include any audits and did not provide assurance as to the regularity of the cost claims reviewed;
nadalje ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje v letu 2012 izvedlo omejen pregled zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov, iz katerega izhaja ugotovitev, da je stopnja napak v programu pod 2 %; je seznanjen z mnenjem Računskega sodišča, da ta pregled ni vključeval nobene revizije in ni dal zagotovila glede pravilnosti pregledanih zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov;
Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that an action plan, was submitted which aims to remedy the deficiencies identified by the Court in its qualified opinion; acknowledges receipt from the Joint Undertaking of the last update with regard to the ex-post audit implementation in the Joint Undertaking; awaits the Court's opinion on the new formula proposed for the calculation of an estimated residual error rate in the Joint Undertaking's transactions; notes that the implementation of the action plan commenced in 2014; looks forward to the successful implementation of the entire action plan, as well as to the opinion of the Court on its outcome; points out that difficulties may arise on the boundary between the NFA's sovereign authority and the Joint Undertaking's authority; calls on the Joint Undertaking to provide a first interim evaluation report on the implementation of the action plan;
je seznanjen z informacijo skupnega podjetja, da je bil predložen akcijski načrt za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je opredelilo Računsko sodišče v svojem mnenju s pridržkom; potrjuje, da je od skupnega podjetja prejel najnovejše informacije o uvedbi naknadnih revizij; pričakuje mnenje Računskega sodišča o predlagani novi formuli za izračun ocenjene preostale stopnje napake pri transakcijah skupnega podjetja; ugotavlja, da se je načrt začel izvajati leta 2014; se veseli uspešne izvedbe celotnega akcijskega načrta in mnenja Računskega sodišča o končnem rezultatu; poudarja, da utegne priti do težav glede razmejitve suverenih pristojnosti nacionalnih organov financiranja in pristojnosti skupnega podjetja; poziva skupno podjetje, naj posreduje prvo vmesno ocenjevalno poročilo o izvajanju akcijskega načrta;
Takes note that the Joint Undertaking's operational budget for 2013 initially included commitment appropriations of EUR 115600000 and payment appropriations of EUR 59700000; notes that the Governing Board adopted an amending budget at the year-end, increasing commitment appropriations to EUR 170000000 and decreasing payment appropriations to EUR 36100000 and resulting in an implementation rate for operational commitment appropriations of 100 % and 95 % for payment appropriations;
ugotavlja, da je operativni proračun skupnega podjetja za leto 2013 prvotno vključeval sredstva za prevzem obveznosti v višini 115600000 EUR in sredstva za plačila v višini 59700000 EUR; ugotavlja, da je upravni odbor na koncu leta sprejel spremembo proračuna, s katerimi so se sredstva za prevzem obveznosti povečala na 170000000 EUR, sredstva za plačila pa zmanjšala na 36100000, stopnja izvrševanja za operativna sredstva za prevzem obveznosti pa je znašala 100 % oziroma 95 % za sredstva za plačila;
Is concerned that there is limited information available regarding the evaluation of the Member States' and AENEAS' contributions corresponding to the actual level of Union payments; in line with the information received, the contribution of the Member States is under the level of 1,8 as requested by the Joint Undertaking's statute; calls on the Joint Undertaking to submit a report to the discharge authority concerning the contributions of all members other than the Commission, including the application of the evaluation rules, together with an assessment by the Commission;
je zaskrbljen, ker je na voljo malo informacij o ocenah, ali prispevki držav članic ter združenja za evropske dejavnosti na področju nanoelektronike (AENEAS) ustrezajo dejanski ravni izplačil Unije; na osnovi prejetih informacij ugotavlja, da prispevek držav članic ne dosega 1,8-kratne vrednosti, kot zahteva statut skupnega podjetja; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice predloži poročilo o prispevkih vseh članov razen Komisije, vključno z uporabo pravil za vrednotenje, priloži pa naj tudi oceno Komisije;
Acknowledges that the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) audited the adequacy and effectiveness of the Grant Management process in 2013, reaching the conclusion that the procedures in place are providing reasonable assurances; notes that the report includes a number of recommendations, the main two of them concerning the setting up of a documented process for selecting experts and control over access rights having been addressed by the Joint Undertaking;
potrjuje, da je leta 2013 služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo revidirala ustreznost in uspešnost procesa upravljanja nepovratnih sredstev in prišla do zaključka, da je zagotovilo, ki ga dajejo vzpostavljeni postopki, zadostno; ugotavlja, da poročilo zajema številna priporočila, od katerih je skupno podjetje obravnavalo dve glavni priporočili, ki se nanašata na vzpostavitev dokumentiranega postopka za izbor strokovnjakov in kontrolo pravic do dostopa;
Takes note that the Joint Undertaking, along with Clean Sky, Artemis, FCH and IMI Joint Undertakings, was the subject of an IT Risk Assessment performed by the IAS on the common IT infrastructure they share; notes from the report the need to formalise IT security policies as well as the need to include detailed procedures in future contracts with IT service providers;
je seznanjen, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo za skupno podjetje, skupaj s skupnima podjetjema „Čisto nebo“, Artemis, skupnim podjetjem za GVC in skupnim podjetjem IMI, opravila oceno tveganja za IT v zvezi s skupnimi infrastrukturami IT, ki si jih ta podjetja delijo; na podlagi poročila ugotavlja, da je treba formalizirati politiko za varnost IT in v prihodnje v pogodbe s ponudniki storitev IT vključiti podrobne postopke;
Takes note that the Seventh Framework Programme Decision establishes a monitoring and reporting system related to the protection, dissemination and transfer of research results; ascertains that the Joint Undertaking has developed in this regard procedures in order to monitor the protection and dissemination of their research results at different project stages; note with concern from the Court's report the further need of development in order to fully meet the provisions of the Decision;
je seznanjen, da sklep o Sedmem okvirnem programu vzpostavlja sistem spremljanja in poročanja, ki zajema varstvo, razširjanje in prenos rezultatov raziskav; potrjuje, da je skupno podjetje razvilo postopke za spremljanje varstva in razširjanja rezultatov raziskav v različnih fazah projekta; na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je treba to spremljanje še razviti, da bo v celoti ustrezalo določbam sklepa;
Acknowledges that between September 2012 and February 2013, the Commission carried out its Second Interim Evaluation in order to assess the Joint Undertaking and the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking in terms of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and research quality; takes note that the report was issued in May 2013 and contained several recommendations for the Joint Undertaking; recalls that the measures concern the efficiency of project reviews, measures to be taken to improve the match of the project portfolio to strategic Union aims and the appropriate metrics for measuring the impact and success of its projects;
potrjuje, da je Komisija od septembra 2012 do februarja 2013 opravila drugo vmesno vrednotenje skupnih podjetij Artemis in ENIAC, ki je zajemalo ustreznost, uspešnost, učinkovitost in kakovost raziskav; ugotavlja, da je bilo poročilo izdano maja 2013 in da je vsebovalo številna priporočila za skupno podjetje; opozarja, da se ukrepi nanašajo na učinkovitost pregledov projektov, ukrepe, ki bi jih bilo treba sprejeti za boljše ujemanje portfelja projektov s strateškimi cilji Unije, ter ustrezna merila za merjenje učinka in uspeha projektov skupnega podjetja;
Acknowledges that the last two calls for proposals were launched in 2013 and enabled the Joint Undertaking to use the remaining EUR 170000000;
potrjuje, da sta bila leta 2013 objavljena zadnja razpisa za zbiranje predlogov, kar je skupnemu podjetju omogočilo porabiti preostalih 170000000 EUR;
Takes into consideration that the new Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the Union was adopted on 25 October 2012 and took effect on 1 January 2013 while the model financial regulation for public-private partnership bodies referred to in Article 209 of the new Financial Regulation did not enter into force until 8 February 2014; notes that the Joint Undertaking's financial rules have not been amended to take into account the model financial regulation because of the merger into the ECSEL Joint Undertaking;
upošteva, da je bila nova finančna uredba, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Unije, sprejeta 25. oktobra 2012 in je začela veljati 1. januarja 2013, vendar pa je vzorčna finančna uredba za subjekte javno-zasebnega partnerstva iz člena 209 nove finančne uredbe začela veljati šele 8. februarja 2014; opaža, da zaradi združitve v Skupno podjetje ECSEL finančna pravila skupnega podjetja niso bila spremenjena tako, da bi odražala te spremembe;
Notes the Joint Statement by the Parliament, the Council and the Commission [1] and the subsequent political agreement reached on the separate discharge for Joint Undertakings under Article 209 of the Financial Regulation;
je seznanjen s skupno izjavo Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije [1] ter posledičnim političnim dogovorom o posebni razrešnici za skupna podjetja na podlagi člena 209 finančne uredbe;
Reiterates its demand to the Court to present a complete and appropriate financial assessment of rights and obligations of the Joint Undertaking for the period up to the date of ECSEL Joint Undertaking starting activity;
znova poziva Računsko sodišče, naj predloži popolno in ustrezno finančno oceno pravic in obveznosti skupnega podjetja za obdobje do datuma, ko je začelo poslovati skupno podjetje ECSEL;
Acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking has taken comprehensive measures to prevent conflicts of interest and has published them on its website; notes from the Court's report that further improvements should be considered such as setting up a database to include all information concerning conflicts of interest;
potrjuje, da je skupno podjetje sprejelo obsežne ukrepe za preprečevanje navzkrižja interesov in jih objavilo na svojem spletnem mestu; na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da bi morali razmisliti o nadaljnjih izboljšavah, kot je oblikovanje baze podatkov z vsemi informacijami, ki se nanašajo na navzkrižje interesov;
Calls on the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority about the progress of the database concerning conflicts of interest;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o napredku, kar zadeva zbirko podatkov o navzkrižjih interesov;
Recalls that the discharge authority has previously requested the Court to draw up a special report on the capacity of the joint undertakings, together with their private partners, to ensure added value and efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes.
želi spomniti, da je organ za podelitev razrešnice v preteklosti že zahteval, naj Računsko sodišče pripravi posebno poročilo o zmožnosti skupnih podjetij, da v povezavi z zasebnimi partnerji zagotovijo dodano vrednost in učinkovito izvajanje raziskovalnih, razvojno-tehnoloških in demonstracijskih programov Unije.
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2013: performance, financial management and control
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna agencij Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2013: uspešnost, finančno poslovodenje in nadzor
having regard to its decisions on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2013,
ob upoštevanju sklepov o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna agencij Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2013,
having regard to the Commission's report on the follow-up to the discharge for the 2012 financial year (COM(2014) 607), and to the accompanying Commission staff working documents (SWD(2014) 285, SWD(2014) 286),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi razrešnice za proračunsko leto 2012 (COM(2014) 607) in delovnih dokumentov služb Komisije, priloženih temu poročilu (SWD(2014) 285, SWD(2014) 286),