natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Norwegian authorities should further provide information, according to Article 5(2) of the Authority's Procedural Decision 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004, on each of the five biggest supported projects for:
V skladu s členom 5(2) Postopkovne odločbe Nadzornega organa 195/04/COL z dne 14. julija 2004 morajo norveški organi predložiti tudi informacije o vsakem od petih največjih projektov, ki so prejeli podporo, za:
The report should, in particular, contain the respective net present value calculation, including the discount rate applied by the Energy Fund, and demonstrate how the market price of that energy has been established.
Poročilo mora zlasti vsebovati izračun posamezne neto sedanje vrednosti, vključno z diskontno stopnjo, ki jo uporablja energetski sklad, in ponazoriti, kako je bila določena tržna cena zadevne energije.
In addition, a list of investment costs for the projects under Article 5(b) of this Decision should be provided.
Poleg tega je treba zagotoviti seznam naložbenih stroškov projektov na podlagi člena 5(b) te odločbe.
As far as biomass projects are receiving support, the reporting should also contain information which demonstrates that the aggregate costs borne by the firms after plant depreciation are still higher than the market price of the energy.
Če podporo prejemajo projekti v zvezi z biomaso, mora poročilo vsebovati tudi podatke, ki dokazujejo, da so skupni stroški, ki jih podjetja nosijo po amortizaciji obrata, še vedno višji od tržne cene energije.
The Norwegian authorities should further submit a new version of the guidelines for the application of the Energy Fund support to the Authority, within six months from adoption of this Decision.
Norveški organi morajo Nadzornemu organu predložiti tudi novo različico smernic za izvajanje podpore energetskega sklada, in sicer v šestih mesecih po sprejetju te odločbe.
The measures referred to under Article 1(a)(d) of this Decision as notified by letter dated 5 June 2003 (Doc. No 03-3705-A) are not compatible with the functioning of the EEA Agreement.
Ukrepi, navedeni v členu 1(a)–(d) te odločbe in priglašeni v dopisu z dne 5. junija 2003 (št. dok. 03-3705-A), niso združljivi z delovanjem Sporazuma EGP.
Individual grants awarded under the above measures, which already fulfil the criteria laid down in Article 4 of this Decision, are compatible with the functioning of the EEA Agreement.
Posamezne subvencije, dodeljene v okviru zgornjih ukrepov, ki že izpolnjujejo merila, določena v členu 4 odločbe, so združljive z delovanjem Sporazuma EGP.
Where it has not already done so, Norway shall repeal the measures referred to in Article 6(a) of this Decision with immediate effect and replace them with measures which fulfil the conditions set out in Article 4 of this Decision.
Če Norveška tega še ni storila, mora s takojšnim učinkom razveljaviti ukrepe, navedene v členu 6(a) te odločbe, in jih nadomestiti z ukrepi, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, opredeljene v členu 4 te odločbe.
The Norwegian authorities shall take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries the aid referred to in Article 6(a) of this Decision and unlawfully made available to the beneficiaries, deducting any repayment already made.
Norveški organi sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da se od upravičencev izterja pomoč, ki je navedena v členu 6(a) te odločbe in jim je bila nezakonito dodeljena, od katere se odšteje morebitno že izvedeno vračilo.
Recovery shall be affected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of the decision.
Vračilo se izvede nemudoma in v skladu s postopki nacionalnega prava, če ti omogočajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvršitev te odločbe.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest and compound interest from the date on which it was at the disposal of the aid beneficiary until the date of its recovery.
Pomoč, ki jo je treba vrniti, vključuje obresti in obrestne obresti od datuma, ko je bila pomoč prejemnikom na voljo, do datuma njenega vračila.
Interest shall be calculated on the basis of Articles 9 and 11 in the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 195/04/COL.
Obresti se izračunajo na podlagi členov 9 in 11 iz Odločbe Nadzornega organa EFTA št. 195/04/COL.
The Norwegian authorities shall inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Norveški organi v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi Nadzorni organ EFTA obvestijo o ukrepih, sprejetih za njeno upoštevanje.
Guidelines on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, adopted and issued by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 19 January 1994, published in OJ L 231, 3.9.1994, p. 1; EEA Supplements No 32, p. 1.
Smernice o uporabi in razlagi členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma EGP in člena 1 Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, ki jih je sprejel in izdal Nadzorni organ EFTA 19. januarja 1994, objavljene v UL L 231, 3.9.1994, str. 1, Dopolnilo EGP št. 32, str. 1.
The Guidelines were last amended on 19 April 2006.
Smernice so bile nazadnje spremenjene 19. aprila 2006.
OJ C 196, 11.8.2005, p. 5.
UL C 196, 11.8.2005, str. 5.
Chapter 6 was subsequently deleted by Authority Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004.
Poglavje 6 je bilo naknadno črtano z Odločbo Nadzornega organa št. 195/04/COL z dne 14. julija 2004.
The definition of unlawful aid is now to be found in Article 1(f) in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Nezakonita pomoč je sedaj opredeljena v členu 1(f) dela II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
For more detailed information on the various correspondence between the Norwegian authorities and the Authority, reference is made to the Authority's Decision to open the formal investigation procedure, Decision No 122/05/COL, see above fn. 5.
Za podrobnejše informacije o različnih dopisih med norveškimi organi in Nadzornim organom se navaja odločba Nadzornega organa o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave, Odločba št. 122/05/COL, glej zgornjo opombo 5.
According to the Norwegian authorities, this levy was introduced in 1990 in the course of the deregulation of the electricity market.
Po navedbah norveških organov je bila ta dajatev uvedena leta 1990 med deregulacijo trga električne energije.
Before 2002, the grid companies managed the levy to cover their own costs connected to information on energy efficiency.
Pred letom 2002 so prenosna podjetja dajatev upravljala za pokritje lastnih stroškov, povezanih z obveščanjem o energetski učinkovitosti.
‘Forskrift om innbetaling av påslag på nettariffen til Energifondet’ (regulation relating to the payment of a levy on the electricity distribution tariff to the Energy Fund, hereinafter ‘Energy Fund Regulation’).
„Forskrift om innbetaling av påslag på nettariffen til Energifondet“ (uredba, ki se nanaša na plačilo dajatve na tarifo za distribucijo električne energije energetskemu skladu, v nadaljevanju „uredba o energetskem skladu“).
Initial thoughts on the establishment of a central body dealing with energy efficiency measures were already presented by an expert committee in 1998, NOU 1998:11.
Strokovni odbor je začetna razmišljanja o ustanovitvi osrednjega organa, ki bi obravnaval ukrepe za energetsko učinkovitost, predstavil že leta 1998, NOU 1998:11.
The Norwegian Government took up this idea in the White paper St.meld.nr.29 (1998-99).
Norveška vlada je to zamisel prevzela v Beli knjigi St.meld.nr.29 (1998–1999).
The change from NVE to the Energy Fund was then finally presented in the fiscal budget for 2001, St.prp.nr.1 (2000-2001).
Prehod z NVE na energetski sklad je bil nato dokončno predstavljen v proračunu za leto 2001, St.prp.nr.1 (2000–2001).
Revised Agreement of 22 September 2004, ‘Avtale mellom den norske stat v/Olje- og energidepartementet og Enova SF om forvaltningen av midlene fa Energifondet i perioden 2002-2005’.
Revidirani Sporazum z dne 22. septembra 2004, „Avtale mellom den norske stat v/Olje- og energidepartementet og Enova SF om forvaltningen av midlene fa Energifondet i perioden 2002–2005“.
The Directive as such has not yet been incorporated into the EEA Agreement.
Direktiva kot takšna še ni vključena v Sporazum EGP.
The Regulation for the Energy Fund (Vedteker for Energifondet, § 4) states that the Energy Fund should be used for energy saving, production of new renewable energy and other environmentally friendly energy.
Uredba o energetskem skladu (Vedteker for Energifondet, § 4) navaja, da je treba energetski sklad uporabiti za varčevanje z energijo, proizvodnjo novih obnovljivih virov energije in drugo okolju prijazno energijo.
See Authority's Decision 302/05/COL, which approved a research and development aid scheme for gas technology.
Glej Odločbo Nadzornega organa 302/05/COL, s katero je bila odobrena shema pomoči za raziskave in razvoj v okviru plinske tehnologije.
Large customers profit often from discounts because of their large delivery contracts.
Veliki odjemalci so pogosto deležni popustov zaradi obsežnih dobavnih pogodb.
This is taken into account by Enova when comparing prices of competing energy sources.
Enova to upošteva, ko primerja cene konkurenčnih energetskih virov.
In the Authority's understanding, there is no upwards adjustment in case of a disadvantage to the applicant.
Po pojmovanju Nadzornega organa prilagoditve navzgor v škodo prosilca ni.
See, however, the Norwegian authorities' suggestion for the future handling of energy saving measures, section I.9.2 of this Decision.
Kljub temu glej predlog norveških organov za prihodnje obravnavanje ukrepov varčevanja z energijo, oddelek I.9.2 te odločbe.
As to the 0,4 %, the Norwegian authorities specified that they concern Enova's own administrative costs for managing such project applications.
Norveški organi so pojasnili, da se 0,4 % nanaša na lastne upravne stroške organa Enova za vodenje takšnih prijav projektov.
N 75/2002 — Finland, Modification of aid scheme for the energy sector.
N 75/2002 – Finska, Sprememba sheme pomoči za energetiko.
The programme was named ‘teaching material and education concepts’ in 2003 and changed its name to ‘education programme’ in 2004.
Program se je leta 2003 imenoval „učno gradivo in izobraževalni koncepti“, leta 2004 pa se je preimenoval v „izobraževalni program“.
Incorporating Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid, OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 30, into the EEA Agreement.
Akt, ki v Sporazum EGP vključuje Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri de minimis pomoči, UL L 10, 13.1.2001, str. 30.
Incorporating Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on aid to small and medium-sized undertakings, OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 33, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 of 25 February 2004, OJ L 63, 28.2.2004, p. 22, into the EEA Agreement.
Akt, ki v Sporazum EGP vključuje Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 70/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe Evropske skupnosti pri pomoči za majhna in srednje velika podjetja, UL L 10, 13.1.2001, str. 33, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 364/2004 z dne 25. februarja 2004, UL L 63, 28.2.2004, str. 22.
Incorporating Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid, OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 20, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 363/2004 of 25 February 2004, OJ L 63, 28.2.2004, p. 20, into the EEA Agreement.
Akt, ki v Sporazum EGP vključuje Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 68/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči za usposabljanje, UL L 10, 13.1.2001, str. 20, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 363/2004 z dne 25. februarja 2004, UL L 63, 28.2.2004, str. 20.
Exchange rates (NOK/Euro) used by the Norwegian authorities: 2002:7.51, 2003:8.00, 2004:8.37, 2005:8.20.
Devizni tečaji (NOK/EUR), ki jih uporabljajo norveški organi: 2002:7,51; 2003:8,00; 2004:8,37; 2005:8,20.
The investment cost occurs at the beginning of year 0.
Naložbeni stroški nastanejo na začetku leta 0.
The income occurs first time at the end of year 1.
Dohodek se prvič pojavi na koncu leta 1.
First Securities is an important player in the Norwegian securities market.
First Securities je pomemben udeleženec na norveškem trgu vrednostnih papirjev.
A method which shows the risk adjusted return on capital as a function of the risk of the market portfolio and the risk of the asset (project) in question.
Metoda, s katero se tveganju prilagojen donos kapitala prikaže kot funkcija tveganja tržnega portfelja in tveganja zadevnega sredstva (projekta).
The formula used by First Securities is RE = RF + β (RM–RF), RF being Norwegian long bonds, β constituting the individual project risk, RM is the expected return on market portfolio, (RM–RF) is the equity risk premium).
Formula, ki jo uporablja First Securities je RE = RF + β (RM – RF), pri čemer RF pomeni norveške dolgoročne obveznice, β predstavlja tveganje posameznega podjetja, RM je pričakovani donos na tržni portfelj, (RM – RF) pa je premija za tveganje v zvezi z lastniškimi finančnimi instrumenti.
RE is the required return on capital invested.
RE je zahtevani donos na vloženi kapital.
Costs incurred by the construction of a heat distribution network are eligible only in network projects involving new technology, (E) Costs of civil engineering work and supervision of construction work, (F) Costs of clearance and earth works, (G) Commissioning costs and costs arising from training of operating personnel required for commissioning.
Stroški izgradnje omrežja za distribucijo toplotne energije so upravičeni samo pri omrežnih projektih, ki vključujejo novo tehnologijo; E) stroški gradbenih del in nadzora nad gradnjo; F) stroški za pripravo zemljišč in zemeljska dela; G) stroški usposobitve za zagon in stroški usposabljanja tehničnega osebja, potrebnega za usposobitev za zagon.
In this context, commissioning refers to the act of operating, testing and adjusting a system of unit for the first time to ensure that it functions according to the specified performance, (H) Costs of project-related information dissemination, (I) Costs of monitoring the investment, (J) Costs related to feasibility studies for the various types of projects (salaries of the participants in the project and indirect labour costs, equipment, accessories, software, travel, information dissemination, other direct or overhead expenses).
V tem okviru se usposobitev za zagon nanaša na prvo upravljanje, preskus in nastavitev sistema enote, s čimer se zagotovi, da ta deluje v skladu z opredeljenim delovanjem; H) stroški s projektom povezanega razširjanja informacij; I) stroški spremljanja naložbe; J) stroški, povezani s študijami izvedljivosti za različne vrste projektov (plače udeležencev v projektu in posredni stroški dela, opreme, pripomočkov, programske opreme, potovanj, razširjanja informacij, drugi neposredni ali splošni stroški).
EBITDA is Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization.
V angleščini EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization).
This comprises net cash inflow from operating activities, before working capital movements.
To obsega prebitek denarnih pritokov pri poslovanju, pred gibljivimi sredstvi.
According to section D.3.3.1 (55) of the Environmental Guidelines, biomass — which has higher operating costs — may receive operating aid which exceeds the amount of investment, if the EFTA State can show that the aggregate costs borne by the firms after plant depreciation are still higher than the market prices of the energy.
V skladu z oddelkom D.3.3.1 (55) Okoljskih smernic biomasa – ki ima višje stroške poslovanja – lahko prejme pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, ki preseže znesek naložbe, če država Efte lahko dokaže, da so skupni stroški, ki jih podjetja nosijo po amortizaciji obrata, še vedno višji od tržnih cen energije.
According to section D.1.3 (25) of the Environmental Guidelines, energy saving measures can be supported at the basic rate of 40 % of eligible costs.
V skladu z oddelkom D.1.3 (25) Okoljskih smernic se ukrepi varčevanja z energijo lahko podprejo do osnovne stopnje 40 % upravičenih stroškov.
According to section D.1.7 (32) of the Environmental Guidelines the support must be limited to the extra investment costs.
V skladu z oddelkom D.1.7 (32) Okoljskih smernic mora biti pomoč omejena na dodatne naložbene stroške.
Eligible costs are calculated net of the benefits accruing from any increase in capacity, cost savings engendered during the first five years of the life of the investment and additional ancillary production during that five-year period.
Upravičeni stroški se izračunajo brez upoštevanja ugodnosti, ki izhajajo iz morebitnega povečanja zmogljivosti, prihrankov stroškov v prvih petih letih trajanja naložbe in dodatne pomožne proizvodnje v tem petletnem obdobju.
Commission Decision of 11 November 2003 on the State aid which the United Kingdom is planning to provide under the WRAP Environmental Grant Fund and the WRAP Lease Guarantee Fund (OJ L 102, 7.4.2004, p. 59).
Odločba Komisije z dne 11. novembra 2003 o državni pomoči, ki jo namerava Združeno kraljestvo zagotoviti v okviru okoljskega jamstvenega sklada WRAP Environmental Grant Fund in zakupnega jamstvenega sklada WRAP Lease Guarantee Fund, (UL L 102, 7.4.2004, str. 59).
See also section ‘information submitted by Norway’ in Authority ' s Decision 122/05/COL, page 12 seq.
Glej tudi oddelek „podatki, ki jih je predložila Norveška“ v Odločbi Nadzornega organa 122/05/COL, str. 12 in nasl.
State aid N 707/2002 — the Netherlands, MEP Stimulating Renewable Energy.
Državna pomoč N 707/2002 – Nizozemska, MEP za spodbujanje obnovljivih virov energije.
Case 173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709, Case 78/76 Steinike v Germany [1977] ECR 595, Commission Decision N 707/2002 — the Netherlands, see above, fn.
Zadeva 173/73 Italija proti Komisiji [1974] Recueil, 709, Zadeva 78/76 Steinike proti Nemčiji [1977] Recueil, 595, Odločba Komisije N 707/2002 – Nizozemska, glej zgoraj, op.
N 490/2000 — Italy, Stranded costs of the electricity sector.
42; N 490/2000 – Italija, Nasedli stroški za sektor električne energije.
Advocate General Jacobs in Case C-379/98 Preussen Elektra v Schleswag AG [2001] ECR I-2099 paragraph 165.
Generalni pravobranilec Jacobs v Zadevi C-379/98 Preussen Elektra proti Schleswag AG [2001] Recueil, I-2099 odstavek 165.
See Case T-67/94 Ladbroke Racing Ltd v Commission of the European Communities [1998] ECR II-1, paragraph 105 seq.
Glej Zadevo T-67/94 Ladbroke Racing Ltd proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1998] Recueil, II-1, odstavek 105 in nasl.
In that respect there is no doubt that the measure can be imputed to the State, who introduced the levy.
V zvezi s tem ni dvoma, da se ukrep lahko naloži državi, ki je uvedla dajatev.
This is a different situation from the system discussed in Case C-345/02 Pearle BV, Hans Prijs Optiek Franchise BV and Rinck Opticiëns BV v Hoofdbedrijfschap Ambachten [2004] ECR I-7139, which concerned a charge decided by a board of professionals.
Gre za drugačen primer kot v Zadevi C-345/02 Pearle BV, Hans Prijs Optiek Franchise BV in Rinck Opticiëns BV proti Hoofdbedrijfschap Ambachten [2004] ZOdl. I-7139, ki se je nanašala na dajatev, o kateri je odločil strokovni odbor.
The Authority would, however, like to point out that for the finding whether the support went to an ‘undertaking’ one does not consider the entity ' s legal status or organisational form, but decides the quality of an undertaking according to the activity which is supported, Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser v Macotron [1991] ECR, I-979; e.g. also non-profit organisations can carry out economic activities and compete with others, see e.g. Case 78/76 Steinike & Weinlig, see above fn.
Nadzorni organ bi kljub temu rad poudaril, da se pri ugotovitvi, ali je bila pomoč namenjena „podjetju“, ne upošteva pravni status ali organizacijska oblika subjekta, ampak se odloča o kakovosti podjetja glede na dejavnost, ki se podpre, Zadeva C-41/90 Höfner in Elser proti Macotronu [1991] Recueil, I-979; tudi neprofitne organizacije npr. lahko izvajajo gospodarske dejavnosti in konkurirajo drugim, glej npr. Zadevo 78/76 Steinike &Weinlig, glej op.
43, and Case C-67/96 Albany, International BV v Stichting Bedrijfspensionfonds Textielindustrie, [1999] ECR I-5751.
43 zgoraj, in Zadevo C-67/96 Albany, International BV proti Stichting Bedrijfspensionfonds Textielindustrie, [1999] Recueil, I-5751.
If the support constitutes aid, which will be established below, the Energy Fund will constitute an aid scheme.
Če bo v nadaljevanju ugotovljeno, da podpora pomeni pomoč, bo energetski sklad pomenil shemo pomoči.
See the definition of an aid scheme in Article 1(d) in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Glej opredelitev sheme pomoči v členu 1(d) dela II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
Case C-241/94 Commission v France [1996] ECR I-4551, paragraph 23.
Zadeva C-241/94 Komisija proti Franciji [1996] Recueil, I-4551, odstavek 23.
See also Advocate General Jacobs in Case C-256/97 DM Transport S.A [1999] ECR I-3913, paragraphs 39 and 40.
Glej tudi generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa v Zadevi C-256/97 DM Transport S.A [1999] Recueil, I-3913, odstavka 39 in 40.
This is supported by Enova's own assessment of its role on its webpage, where it is stated: ‘Enova SF enjoys considerable freedom with regard to the choice and composition of its strategic foci and policy measures’.
To potrjuje lastna ocena organa Enova o njegovi vlogi, objavljena na njegovi spletni strani, v kateri je navedeno: „Enova SF ima precejšnjo svobodo pri izbiri in sestavi svojih strateških poudarkov in ukrepov politike.“
E.g. in relation to electricity producers relying on traditional sources or — currently — in relation to hydropower producers or other renewable energy producers which are not supported by Enova; or companies which are not supported for applying energy efficiency measures.
Npr. glede na proizvajalce električne energije, ki so odvisni od tradicionalnih virov, ali – trenutno – glede na proizvajalce vodne energije ali druge proizvajalce obnovljivih virov energije, ki jih Enova ne podpira; ali podjetja, ki ne prejmejo podpore za izvajanje ukrepov za energetsko učinkovitost.
Decision 195/04/COL.
Odločba 195/04/COL.
Case C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit v Office National du Duccroire and the Belgian State [1994] ECR I-3829.
Zadeva C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit proti Office National du Duccroire in državi Belgiji [1994] Recueil, I-3829.
See in this respect the interpretation by Advocate General Fennelly in Cases C-15/98 and C-105/99 in Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities [2000] ECR II-8855, paragraphs 61 seq, who claims that the legislative changes must alter the system significantly, i.e. represent more than just a formal change.
V zvezi s tem glej razlago generalnega pravobranilca Fennellyja v zadevah C-15/98 in C-105/99 v Italijanska republika proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [2000] Recueil, II-8855, odstavki 61 in nasl., ki trdi, da morajo zakonodajne spremembe bistveno spremeniti sistem, tj. biti več kot le oblikovna sprememba.
In the respective Government proposals, the Norwegian authorities themselves labelled the financing mechanism as ‘new’.
V zadevnih vladnih predlogih so norveški organi mehanizem financiranja sami označili za „novega“.
Cases T-195/01 and T-207/01 Government of Gibraltar and Kingdom of Spain v. European Commission [2001] ECR II-3915, paragraph 111.
Zadevi T-195/01 in T-207/01 Vlada Gibraltarja in Kraljevina Španija proti Evropski komisiji [2001] Recueil, II-3915, odstavek 111.
Case C-351/98 Kingdom of Spain v. the European Commission [2002] ECR I-8031, paragraph 76.
Zadeva C-351/98 Kraljevina Španija proti Evropski komisiji [2002] Recueil, I-8031, odstavek 76.
Section II 3.1.1 of Authority's Decision 122/05/COL.
Oddelek II 3.1.1. Odločbe Nadzornega organa 122/05/COL.