natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Cf. definition in the OSLO manual, page 51.
Prim. opredelitev v priročniku OSLO, stran 51.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraph 7, Case C-35/96 Commission v Italy [1998] ECR I-3851, CNSD, paragraph 36; Case C-309/99 Wouters [2002] ECR I-1577 paragraph 46.
Zadeva 118/85 Komisija proti Italiji [1987] Recueil, 2599, odstavek 7, zadeva C-35/96 Komisija proti Italiji [1998] Recueil, I-3851, CNSD, odstavek 36; zadeva C-309/99 Wouters [2002] Recueil, I-1577, odstavek 46.
Economic activities comprise in particular research carried out under contract with industry, the renting out of research infrastructure and consultancy work.
Gospodarske dejavnosti zajemajo zlasti raziskave, ki se izvajajo po pogodbi z industrijo, oddajanje raziskovalne infrastrukture in svetovalno delo.
By internal nature, the Authority means a situation where the management of the knowledge of the research organisation(s) is conducted either by a department or a subsidiary of the research organisation or jointly with other research organisations.
Nadzorni organ z interno naravo misli na razmere, kadar upravljanje znanja raziskovalne(-ih) organizacije(-ij) vodi bodisi oddelek ali podružnica raziskovalne organizacije ali več različnih raziskovalnih organizacij skupaj.
Contracting the provision of specific services to third parties by way of open tenders does not jeopardise the internal nature of such activities.
Sklepanje pogodb za izvajanje posebnih storitev s tretjimi strankami prek javnega razpisa ne ogroža interne narave takih dejavnosti.
For all remaining kinds of technology transfer receiving State funding, the Authority does not consider itself in a position, on the basis of its current knowledge, to decide in a general manner upon the State aid character of the funding of such activities.
Za vse preostale vrste prenosa tehnologije, ki prejemajo državna sredstva, Nadzorni organ meni, da na podlagi trenutnega poznavanja ni v položaju, da bi lahko na splošno odločil, ali financiranje takih dejavnosti pomeni državno pomoč ali ne.
It underlines the obligation of the EFTA States under Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement to assess the character of such measures in each case and to notify them to the Authority, in case they consider them to represent State aid.
Poudarja obveznost držav Efte na podlagi Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, da ocenijo naravo takih ukrepov v vsakem primeru in jih priglasijo Nadzornemu organu, če menijo, da pomenijo državno pomoč.
Cf. Case C-482/99 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-4397, on the issue of imputability to the State.
Prim. Zadeva C-482/99 Francija proti Komisiji [2002] Recueil, I-4397, glede pripisovanja državi.
“Full allocation” means that the research organisation enjoys the full economic benefit of those rights by retaining full disposal of them, notably the right of ownership and the right to license.
‚V celoti dodeljena sredstva‘ pomeni, da ima raziskovalna organizacija polno gospodarsko korist od teh pravic s tem, da v celoti ohrani pravice, zlasti lastninsko pravico in pravico dodeljevanja licenc.
These conditions may also be fulfilled if the organisation decides to conclude further contracts concerning these rights including licensing them to the collaboration partner.
Ti pogoji so lahko izpolnjeni tudi, če se organizacija odloči skleniti nadaljnje pogodbe v zvezi s temi pravicami, vključno s pravico dodelitve licenc sodelujočemu partnerju.
“Compensation equivalent to the market price for the intellectual property rights” refers to compensation for the full economic benefit of those rights.
‚Nadomestilo v višini tržne cene za pravice intelektualne lastnine‘ se nanaša na nadomestilo za polno gospodarsko korist od teh pravic.
In line with general State aid principles and given the inherent difficulty to establish objectively the market price for intellectual property rights, the Authority will consider this condition fulfilled if the research organisation as seller negotiates in order to obtain the maximum benefit at the moment when the contract is concluded.
V skladu s splošnimi načeli državne pomoči in glede na s tem povezano dejstvo, da je težko objektivno določiti tržno ceno pravic intelektualne lastnine, bo Nadzorni organ upošteval ta pogoj kot izpolnjen, če se raziskovalna organizacija kot prodajalka pogaja, da bi obdržala največjo možno korist v času sklenitve pogodbe.
This provision does not intend to modify the obligation of the EFTA States to notify certain measures on the basis of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Ta določba nima namena spreminjati obveznosti držav Efte, da priglasijo nekatere ukrepe na podlagi Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2002.
Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj, 2002.
Projects funded under the Framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities will automatically qualify for a bonus for collaboration due to the minimum conditions for participation in such projects.
Projekti, ki se financirajo iz Okvirnega programa Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti, bodo samodejno upravičeni do bonusa za sodelovanje, in sicer zaradi minimalnih pogojev za sodelovanje v takih projektih.
Chapter 34 of the State Aid Guidelines corresponds to the Commission notice on the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3) also published under:http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/state_aid/legislation/reference.html
Poglavje 34 Smernic za državno pomoč ustreza Obvestilu Komisije o načinu določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj (UL C 273, 9.9.1997, str. 3), objavljenem tudi na:http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/state_aid/legislation/reference.html
EFTA States will be expected to provide evaluation studies on the incentive effects of their own fiscal measures.
Od držav Efte se bo pričakovalo, da zagotovijo ocenjevalne študije o spodbujevalnih učinkih lastnih davčnih ukrepov.
Conversely, where an R&D&I fiscal State aid measure distinguishes between different R&D&I categories, the relevant aid intensities must not be exceeded.
Kadar pa ukrep davčne državne pomoči R&R&I razlikuje med različnimi kategorijami R&R&I, ustrezne intenzivnosti pomoči ne smejo biti presežene.
This is without prejudice to the application of Chapter 25.B national regional aid, 2007-2013, corresponding to the Community Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007—2013 (OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13).
To ne posega v uporabo Poglavja 25.B o državni regionalni pomoči, 2007–2013, ki ustreza Smernicam Skupnosti o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013 (UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str. 13).
Without prejudice to the possibility of also receiving de minimis aid in respect of other eligible expenses.
Ne glede na možnost prejemanja tudi pomoči de minimis za druge upravičene stroške.
Currently point 1.f of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement.
Trenutno točka 1.f Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP.
If the aid proposal is to grant aid for an R&D&I project, this does not exclude that the potential beneficiary has already carried out feasibility studies which are not covered by the request for State aid.
Če je predlog pomoči v obliki dodelitve pomoči za projekt R&R&I, to ne izključuje možnosti, da je morebitni upravičenec že opravil študije izvedljivosti, ki jih ne zajema prošnja za državno pomoč.
I.e. project aid for large undertakings and for SMEs for aid exceeding EUR 7,5 million; aid for process and organisational innovation in services and aid for innovation clusters.
Tj. pomoč za projekte za velika podjetja in MSP za pomoč, ki presega 7,5 milijona EUR; pomoč za procesne in organizacijske inovacije v storitvah ter pomoč za inovacijske grozde.
For Eureka projects, this ceiling is set at twice the amount.
Za projekte EUREKA je ta zgornja meja dvakratni znesek.
A project is considered to consist “predominantly” of fundamental research, if more than half of the eligible project costs is incurred through activities which fall within the category of fundamental research.
Za projekt se šteje, da je sestavljen ‚pretežno‘ iz temeljnih raziskav, če več kot polovica upravičenih stroškov projekta nastane na podlagi dejavnosti, ki sodijo v kategorijo temeljnih raziskav.
A project is considered to consist “predominantly” of industrial research, if more than half of the eligible project costs is incurred through activities which fall within the categories of industrial research or fundamental research.
Za projekt se šteje, da je sestavljen ‚pretežno‘ iz industrijskih raziskav, če več kot polovica upravičenih stroškov projekta nastane na podlagi dejavnosti, ki sodijo v kategorijo industrijskih ali temeljnih raziskav.
These may include methods to evaluate the Net Present Value of the project (that is to say, the sum of the discounted expected cash flow resulting from the investment minus the investment cost), the internal rate of return (IRR) or the return of capital employed (ROCE).
Te lahko vključujejo metode za ocenjevanje neto sedanje vrednosti projekta (to je vsota znižanega pričakovanega denarnega toka, ki izhaja iz naložb, zmanjšanega za stroške naložb), notranjo stopnjo donosa (IRR) ali donos vloženega kapitala (ROCE).
Financial reports and internal business plans containing information on demand forecasts; cost forecasts; financial forecasts (for example, NPV, IRR, ROCE), documents that are submitted to an investment committee and that elaborate on various investment scenarios or documents provided to the financial markets could serve as evidence.
Finančna poročila in notranji poslovni načrti, ki vsebujejo informacije o napovedih povpraševanja, napovedih stroškov, finančnih napovedih (npr. NPV, IRR, ROCE), dokumenti, ki so predloženi odboru za naložbe in obravnavajo več naložbenih scenarijev, ali dokumenti, posredovani finančnim trgom, se lahko uporabijo kot dokazila.
Chapter 10.B of the State Aid Guidelines corresponds to the Community Guidelines on State aid to promote risk capital investment in SME (OJ C 194, 18.8.2006, p. 2).
Poglavje 10.B Smernic o državni pomoči ustreza Smernicam Skupnosti o državnih pomočeh za spodbujanje naložb rizičnega kapitala v mala in srednje velika podjetja (UL C 194, 18.8.2006, str. 2).
OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37.
UL L 139, 25.5.2006, str. 37.
Corresponding to Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Ustreza Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1) in Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
In that process, EFTA States may want to support the Authority by providing their own ex post assessment of schemes and individual measures.
V tem procesu bi lahko države Efte pomagale Nadzornemu organu s tem, da bi zagotovile lastno naknadno oceno shem in individualnih ukrepov.
Adopted by EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 14/07/COL on 7 February 2007.
Sprejeto z Odločbo Nadzornega organa Efte št. 14/07/COL z dne 7. februarja 2007.
State aid for R&D&I must lead to the recipient of aid changing its behaviour so that it increases its level of R&D&I activity and R&D&I projects or activities take place which would not otherwise be carried out, or which would be carried out in a more restricted manner.
Državna pomoč za R&R&I mora prejemnika pomoči spodbuditi k temu, da spremeni svoje ravnanje, tako da poveča raven dejavnosti R&R&I in izvajanja projektov ali dejavnosti R&R&I, ki se sicer ne bi izvajali ali bi se izvajali bolj omejeno.
as regards innovation advisory services the following costs: management consulting; technological assistance; technology transfer services; training; consultancy for acquisition, protection and trade in Intellectual Property Rights and for licensing agreements; consultancy on the use of standards,
pri svetovalnih storitvah za inovacije naslednji stroški: svetovanje pri upravljanju; tehnološka pomoč; storitve prenosa tehnologij; usposabljanje; svetovanje za pridobitev, zaščito in trgovanje s pravicami intelektualne lastnine ter za licenčne sporazume; svetovanje glede uporabe standardov,
This means it is necessary to clearly identify the market failure they intend to target with the aid measure.1.3.4. Incentive effect and necessity of aid
To pomeni, da je treba jasno opredeliti tržno nepopolnost, v katero nameravajo usmeriti ukrep pomoči.1.3.4 Spodbujevalni učinek in nujnost pomoči
Promoting research and development and innovation (hereinafter: R&D&I) is an important objective of common interest within the European Economic Area [1]. Article 163 of the EC Treaty stipulates that “[t]he Community shall have the objective of strengthening the scientific and technological bases of Community industry and encouraging it to become more competitive at international level, while promoting all the research activities deemed necessary (…)”.
Spodbujanje raziskav in razvoja ter inovacij (v nadaljnjem besedilu ‚R&R&I‘) je pomemben cilj skupnega interesa znotraj Evropskega gospodarskega prostora [1].Člen 163 Pogodbe ES določa, da je ‚[c]ilj Skupnosti […] okrepiti znanstvene in tehnološke temelje industrije Skupnosti ter jo spodbujati, da postane bolj konkurenčna na mednarodni ravni, pri čemer pospešuje vse raziskovalne dejavnosti, ki se zdijo potrebne […]‘.
What is decisive for its qualification as an undertaking is whether the research organisation carries out an economic activity, which is an activity consisting of offering goods and/or services on a given market [23]. Accordingly, any public funding of economic activities falls under Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement, should all other conditions be fulfilled.3.1.1. Public funding of non-economic activities
Za opredelitev raziskovalne organizacije kot podjetje je odločilno, ali izvaja gospodarsko dejavnost, to je dejavnost, ki vključuje ponujanje dobrin in/ali storitev na določenem trgu [23].V skladu s tem katero koli javno financiranje gospodarskih dejavnosti sodi v področje uporabe člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP, če so izpolnjeni vsi drugi pogoji.3.1.1 Javno financiranje negospodarskih dejavnosti
No 28/07/COL
št. 28/07/COL
concerning the official tuberculosis, brucellosis and enzootic bovine leucosis-free status of Norway as regards bovine herds
o statusu Norveške glede govejih čred, uradno prostih tuberkuloze, bruceloze in enzootske goveje levkoze
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement), in particular Article 109 and Protocol 1 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu Sporazum EGP) ter zlasti člena 109 in Protokola 1 k Sporazumu,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, in particular Article 5(2)(d) and Protocol 1 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča ter zlasti člena 5(2)(b) Sporazuma in Protokola 1 k Sporazumu,
HAVING REGARD to the Act referred to at Point 4.1.1 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement, Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine [1], as amended and as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, and in particular to Annex A(I)(4), Annex A(II)(7) and Annex D(I)(E) of that Act,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU akta iz točke 4.1.1 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP, Direktiva Sveta 64/432/EGS z dne 26. junija 1964 o problemih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki vplivajo na trgovino z govedom in prašiči znotraj Skupnosti [1], kakor je bil spremenjen in prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu, in zlasti Prilogi A(I)(4), Prilogi A(II)(7) in Prilogi D(I)(E) tega akta,
HAVING REGARD to the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 24/07/COL of 14 February 2007, whereby the competent College Member is instructed to adopt the Decision concerning the official tuberculosis, brucellosis and enzootic bovine leucosis-free status of Norway as regards bovine herds if the draft decision is in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Veterinary Committee (EVC),
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Odločbe št. 24/07/COL Nadzornega organa EFTA z dne 14. februarja 2007, s katero se pristojnemu članu kolegija naroči, da sprejme odločbo o statusu Norveške glede govejih čred, uradno prostih tuberkuloze, bruceloze in enzootske goveje levkoze, če je osnutek odločbe v skladu z mnenjem Veterinarskega odbora Efte (EVC),
WHEREAS Directive 64/432/EEC provides that EEA EFTA States or parts or regions thereof may be declared officially free of tuberculosis, brucellosis and enzootic bovine leucosis as regards bovine herds subject to compliance with certain conditions set out in that Act;
KER Direktiva 64/432/EGS določa, da se lahko države članice EGP Efte ali njihovi deli ali regije priznajo kot uradno proste tuberkuloze, bruceloze in enzootske goveje levkoze za stalež govedi, ki so v skladu z nekaterimi pogoji iz navedenega akta,
WHEREAS by letter of 29 June 2004, Norway has submitted to the Authority the relevant documentation related to enzootic bovine leucosis in accordance with Annex D(I)(E) and Article 8 of Directive 64/432/EEC;
KER je Norveška v dopisu z dne 29. junija 2004 Nadzornemu organu predložila ustrezno dokumentacijo, povezano z enzootsko govejo levkozo, v skladu s Prilogo D(I)(E) in členom 8 Direktive 64/432/EGS,
WHEREAS by letters of 14 February 2005, 13 December 2005 and 26 October 2006, Norway submitted to the Authority up-dated information related to enzootic bovine leucosis as requested by the latter following discussions with the European Commission;
KER je Norveška v dopisih z dne 14. februarja 2005, 13. decembra 2005 in 26. oktobra 2006 po razpravah z Evropsko komisijo Nadzornemu organu predložila zahtevane posodobljene podatke, povezane z enzootsko govejo levkozo,
WHEREAS the EFTA Surveillance Authority, in close cooperation with the European Commission, has examined all the documentation submitted by Norway and this examination shows that the scheme related to enzootic bovine leucosis submitted by Norway complies with all the relevant conditions provided for in Directive 64/432/EEC;
KER je Nadzorni organ EFTA, v tesnem sodelovanju z Evropsko komisijo, proučil vso dokumentacijo, ki jo je predložila Norveška in ta preiskava kaže, da je program, povezan z enzootsko govejo levkozo, ki jo je predložila Norveška, v skladu z vsemi ustreznimi pogoji iz Direktive 64/432/EGS,
WHEREAS it is therefore appropriate that Norway may be declared as officially free of enzootic bovine leucosis;
KER je zato primerno, da se Norveško prizna kot uradno prosto enzootske goveje levkoze,
WHEREAS by EFTA Surveillance Authority Decisions No 66/94/COL and No 67/94/COL of 27 June 1994, Norway was granted brucellosis-free and tuberculosis-free status of bovine herds, provided that certain conditions were met;
KER je Nadzorni organ EFTA z Odločbama št. 66/94/COL in št. 67/94/COL z dne 27. junija 1994 odobril, da je status govejih čred na Norveškem prost bruceloze oziroma prost tuberkuloze, pod pogojem, da so bili izpolnjeni določeni pogoji,
WHEREAS Decisions No 66/94/COL and No 67/94/COL were respectively replaced by the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decisions No 227/96/COL and No 225/96/COL of 4 December 1996;
KER sta bili Odločbi št. 66/94/COL in št. 67/94/COL ustrezno nadomeščeni z Odločbama Nadzornega organa EFTA št. 227/96/COL in št. 225/96/COL z dne 4. decembra 1996,
WHEREAS, in the interests of clarity, the status with regard to the diseases tuberculosis, brucellosis and enzootic bovine leucosis, as regards bovine herds in Norway, should be set out in the same Decision;
KER mora biti zaradi jasnosti status glede bolezni tuberkuloze, bruceloze in enzootske goveje levkoze govejih čred na Norveškem določen v navedeni odločbi,
WHEREAS, accordingly, EFTA Surveillance Authority Decisions No 225/96/COL and No 227/96/COL should be replaced by this Decision;
KER je treba Odločbi št. 225/96/COL in št. 227/96/COL Nadzornega organa EFTA nadomestiti s to odločbo,
In accordance with Directive 64/432/EEC, Norway is declared as officially free of tuberculosis, brucellosis and enzootic bovine leucosis as regards bovine herds.
V skladu z Direktivo 64/432/EGS je priznano, da so goveje črede na Norveškem uradno proste tuberkuloze, bruceloze in enzootske goveje levkoze.
Pursuant to Article 109(2) of the EEA Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall forward this Decision and any amendments thereto to the European Commission.
V skladu s členom 109(2) Sporazuma EGP Nadzorni organ EFTA posreduje to odločbo in morebitne spremembe Evropski komisiji.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority Decisions No 227/96/COL and No 225/96/COL of 4 December 1996 are replaced hereby.
Odločbi Nadzornega organa EFTA št. 227/96/COL in št. 225/96/COL z dne 4. decembra 1996 se nadomestita.
This Decision shall enter into force on 19 February 2007.
Ta odločba začne veljati 19. februarja 2007.
No 29/07/COL
št. 29/07/COL
approving the plan submitted by Norway for the preventive vaccination of birds kept in zoos against highly pathogenic avian influenza
o odobritvi načrta, ki ga je predložila Norveška, za preventivno cepljenje ptic v živalskih vrtovih proti visoko patogeni aviarni influenci
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 109 and Protocol 1 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru ter zlasti člena 109 in Protokola 1 Sporazuma,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, and in particular Article 5(2)(d) and Protocol 1 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča ter zlasti člena 5(2)(b) Sporazuma in Protokola 1 k Sporazumu,
HAVING REGARD to the Act referred to at Point 3.1.5a of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement, Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC) [1], as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, and in particular to Articles 56(2) and 57(2) thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU akta iz točke 3.1.5a poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP, Direktiva sveta 2005/94/ES z dne 20. decembra 2005 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje aviarne influence in razveljavitvi Direktive 92/40/EGS [1], kakor je bila prilagojena Sporazumu EGP s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu, in zlasti členu 56(2) ter členu 57(2) Sporazuma,
HAVING REGARD to the Act applicable to Norway following the procedures referred to in Article 3(b) of the introductory part of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement, Commission Decision 2006/474/EC of 6 July 2006 concerning measures to prevent the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 to birds kept in zoos and approved bodies, institutes and centres in the Member States and repealing Decision 2005/744/EC [2],
OB UPOŠTEVANJU akta, ki se uporablja za Norveško po postopkih iz člena 3(b) uvodnega dela poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP, Odločba Komisije 2006/474/ES z dne 6. julija 2006 o ukrepih za preprečevanje širjenja visoko patogene aviarne influence, ki jo povzroča virus influence A podtipa H5N1, na ptice v živalskih vrtovih in odobrenih ustanovah, inštitutih ali središčih v državah članicah ter o razveljavitvi Odločbe 2005/744/ES [2],
HAVING REGARD to the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 22/07/COL of 14 February 2007, whereby the competent Member of the College is instructed to adopt the Decision if the draft decision is in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Veterinary Committee (EVC),
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Odločbe Nadzornega organa EFTA št. 22/07/COL z dne 14. februarja 2007, s katerim se pristojnemu članu kolegija naroči, da sprejme Odločbo, če je osnutek Odločbe v skladu z mnenjem Veterinarskega odbora Efte,