natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Training BTSF
opozarja, da je treba nujno okrepiti sposobnost ESZD in delegacij Unije, da se obvarujejo pred vohunskimi dejavnostmi tretjih držav, vključno s povečanjem varnosti njihovih omrežij IT in izgradnjo sistemov za varno komunikacijo; poleg tega vztraja, da se nemudoma pripravi ocena s tem povezanih proračunskih potreb;
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge for implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012, Section X — European External Action Service
zahteva, da se letnemu poročilu o dejavnostih priloži nepremičninska politika ESZD, zlasti ob upoštevanju, da je pomembno, da se takšni stroški primerno racionalizirajo in da niso prekomerni;
having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012 [1],having regard to the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012 (COM(2013) 570 – C7-0282/2013) [2],having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012, together with the institutions’ replies [3],having regard to the statement of assurance [4] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2012 pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,having regard to Article 314(10) and Articles 317, 318 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
poziva ESZD, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice posreduje seznam nepremičninskih pogodb, sklenjenih v letu 2012, vključno s podrobnostmi pogodb, navedbo države, v kateri je bila pogodba sklenjena, in dolžino pogodbe, kot je bilo vključeno v letno poročilo o dejavnostih ESZD za leto 2011, in jo tudi poziva, naj enake podrobnosti o nepremičninskih pogodbah vključi v letno poročilo o dejavnostih za leto 2013;
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], and in particular Articles 50, 86, 145, 146 and 147 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [6], and in particular Articles 164, 165, 166 and 167 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions;
meni, da bi bilo mogoče doseči izboljšave pri finančnem poslovodenju, da bi se izognili obrestim za zamude pri plačilu in zlasti zmanjšali zamude; opozarja na to, da so trije najvišji zneski obresti za zamude pri plačilu 3714,84 EUR, 4395,71 EUR in 5931,67 EUR;
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0199/2014),
poudarja potrebo po parlamentarnem nadzoru INTCEN, EUMS INT, Situacijskega centra in Satelitskega centra, ki pripravljajo analize, med drugim na podlagi informacij nacionalnih tiskovnih agencij, za nosilce odločitev in spodbujajo sodelovanje med nacionalnimi tiskovnimi agencijami;
Notes that on the basis of its audit work, the Court of Auditors concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2012 for administrative and other expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error;
zahteva, da se za Center Evropske unije za analizo obveščevalnih podatkov (INTCEN), EUMS INT in Situacijski center v proračunu ESZD vzpostavijo lastne proračunske vrstice, da bi zagotovili demokratični nadzor in preglednost;
Welcomes that in its second financial year, the European External Action Service (‘EEAS’) has continued to implement its budget without material errors being identified by the Court of Auditors and that most of the problems identified in the 2011 Annual Report of the Court of Auditors as result of the setting-up process have not reoccurred;
poziva visoko predstavnico, naj v letnem poročilu o dejavnosti ESZD navede izčrpne informacije o proračunu in osebju INTCEN, EUMS INT in Situacijskega centra;
Points out that in the 2012 annual report, the Court of Auditors did not identify any significant weakness in respect of the topics audited for the EEAS’; takes note that some weaknesses persist in the management of social allowance and regrets that the same problems which occurred in 2011 were repeatedly reported in the 2012 Annual Report of the Court of Auditors; urges the EEAS to implement all recommendations made; welcomes the steps the EEAS has taken with regard to the issue so far and encourages it to speed up the roll-out of its new programme to resolve it;
poziva ESZD, naj v svojem letnem poročilu objavi, koliko zaupnih dokumentov, razvrščenih po stopnji zaupnosti, je ESZD prejela od posameznih organov, drugih institucij in držav članic in tretjih držav ter koliko jih je posredovala;
Is concerned that in 2012, the PMO system was not yet fully operational, leading to the incorrect payment of social allowances to staff members;
meni, da sistemi proračunske podpore za vlade držav nečlanic niso ustrezno revidirani, in poziva k učinkovitejšemu nadzoru finančnih operacij že v zgodnji fazi;
Takes note of the replies given to the Court of Auditors’ observations and regrets that they only describe actions taken in 2013;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v naslednje letno poročilo vključi pregled nadaljnjih ukrepov ESZD na podlagi priporočil, ki jih je Parlament podal v tej resoluciji.
Notes that at the end of 2012, the final budget for EEAS headquarters was EUR 184100000, with an execution of commitments rating of 99,35 % and was EUR 304500000 for the delegations, with a commitments rating of 99,45 %; takes note that the budget of the delegations had to be supplemented by the Commission for a total of EUR 268000000;
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012, oddelek IV – Sodišče Evropske unije
Is concerned with the carrying over of appropriations in 2012; suggests the development of key performance indicators to monitor the most critical areas in order to improve the budget execution over the coming years;
ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012 [1],ob upoštevanju konsolidiranega zaključnega računa Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012 (COM(2013) 570 – C7-0276/2013) [2],ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2012 z odgovori institucij [3],ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti [4] računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij, ki jo je za proračunsko leto 2012 v skladu s členom 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pripravilo Računsko sodišče,ob upoštevanju člena 314(10) ter členov 317, 318 in 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
Recalls that the EEAS is a recently created institution, resulting from the consolidation of different services, and that 2011 was its first year of operation with numerous technical challenges to be overcome, particularly in procurement and recruitment; notes that the excessive administrative burden resulting from arrangements necessary for setting up the EEAS has been eased in 2012; is concerned, however, that the Chief Operating Officer of the EEAS has maintained his reservations concerning some of the security contracts of Union Delegations and several Union Delegations have issued reservations as well;
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], zlasti členov 50, 86, 145, 146 in 147 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [6], zlasti členov 164, 165 in 166 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih sklepov in resolucij o razrešnici,
Appreciates the detailed response given to a wide range of written and oral questions made by the members of Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control;
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A7-0213/2014),
Notes the importance of the current discharge in establishing the framework for future discharge exercises and believes that it will reinforce the expectations of future developments and improvements in the effectiveness of the EEAS and its operations;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v letnem poročilu za leto 2012 navedlo, da ni ugotovilo hujših pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z revidiranimi področji, ki so se nanašala na človeške vire in javna naročila Sodišča Evropske unije (v nadaljevanju: sodišče);
Takes note of the difficulties in implementing a budget with various sources that lack equilibrium, in particular the shared costs of delegations;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Računsko sodišče na podlagi revizijskega dela sklenilo, da v skupnih plačilih za upravne in druge odhodke institucij in organov za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2012, ni bilo pomembnih napak;
Believes that the current structure of the EEAS budget, with contributions from the Commission’s 26 different budget lines and the European Development Fund makes it impossible to have a clear overview of the real costs and expenses of the work of the EEAS and its Delegations; supports the simplification proposal made by the EEAS in November 2013 and asks the Commission to implement the changes proposed and to examine the further simplification of the EEAS’s current financing;
je seznanjen, da so sredstva za prevzem obveznosti sodišča v letu 2012 znašala 343567692,52 EUR (335904453,30 EUR v letu 2011) in da je stopnja izvrševanja za ta sredstva znašala 98,63 %, več kot v letu 2011; znova poudarja, da je proračun sodišča povsem upravne narave;
Considers positive the fact that the EEAS posts are now also open to Parliament’s officials;
ugotavlja, da se je število nerešenih in zaključenih zadev na splošnem sodišču v letu 2012 v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti nekoliko zmanjšalo (1308 nerešenih zadev v letu 2011 in 1237 nerešenih zadev v letu 2012); obžaluje pa, da se je zmanjšalo tudi število rešenih zadev (714 v letu 2011 in 688 v letu 2012); meni, da bi predlog za imenovanje novih, dodatnih sodnikov na splošnem sodišču, ki ga Svet še preučuje, lahko učinkovito zmanjšal število nerešenih zadev;
Endorses the target of reaching a one-third proportion of National Diplomats among all EEAS staff members by the mid-2013 deadline; takes note that EEAS is not static and that the selection of staff is based on applications and merit;
ugotavlja, da se je na Sodišču Evropske unije in sodišču za uslužbence v primerjavi z letom 2011 število zaključenih zadev zmanjšalo, število nerešenih zadev pa povečalo (Sodišče Evropske unije: 849 nerešenih zadev v letu 2011 in 886 nerešenih zadev v letu 2012, 638 zaključenih zadev v letu 2011 in 595 zaključenih zadev v letu 2012; sodišče za uslužbence: 178 nerešenih zadev v letu 2011 in 235 nerešenih zadev v letu 2012, 166 zaključenih zadev v letu 2011 in 121 zaključenih zadev v letu 2012); ugotavlja, da ni prišlo še do nobene zamenjave članov sodišča za uslužbence;
Regrets, however, that a better geographical balance has not yet been achieved as regards appointments to management posts; urges the EEAS to implement measures that contribute to a better and more balanced representation of all Member States;
zahteva nedvoumne informacije o rezultatih vseh tri- in petčlanskih sodnih senatov Sodišča Evropske unije in splošnega sodišča ter tri- in enočlanskih senatov sodišča za uslužbence; zahteva podatke o številu zadev, ki sta jih predsednik in podpredsednik obravnavala kot poročevalca po reorganizaciji Sodišča Evropske unije;
Asks the EEAS to strengthen the geographical balance, in particular as regards the posts of Head of Union Delegations; reiterates the need for an enforced geographical balance of the Member States at all levels of the administration;
poziva Sodišče Evropske unije, splošno sodišče in sodišče za uslužbence, naj posredujejo podatke o številu zadev, ki so nerešene že več kot 24 mesecev;
Welcomes the fact that since 2011 the number of women in Head of Delegation posts have more than doubled from 10 to 24 (17 % of the total) and that in Headquarters there are 22 women in management positions of head of divisions and above representing 18 % of the total; encourages the EEAS to continue improving the gender balance both in the Delegations and at the Headquarters;
poudarja, da Sodišče Evropske unije priznava, da bi lahko povečalo učinkovitost z obstoječimi viri; poudarja, da so notranje reforme v letu 2012, namreč ustanovitev senata petih sodnikov in senata treh sodnikov ter spremembe v sestavi velikega senata, in revizija poslovnika prispevale k določenim sistemskim spremembam in da bi lahko z nadaljnjimi reformami dosegli še več; poziva Sodišče Evropske unije, naj posreduje podatke o tem, koliko zadev je bilo v letu 2012 dodeljenih posameznim poročevalcem Sodišča Evropske unije in splošnega sodišča;
Recognises that efforts have been made to reduce the top-heavy EEAS administration; welcomes the efforts to reduce the number of AD 15 and AD 16 posts and encourages the EEAS to continue improving this situation;
poziva Sodišče Evropske unije, naj poišče rešitev za naraščajoče število novih primerov in velike delovne obremenitve, saj v prihodnosti notranje reforme in spremembe poslovnika ne bodo zadostovale za korenito zmanjšanje števila nerešenih zadev; meni, da bi bila lahko ena od rešitev zmanjšanje števila tednov, ko ni obravnav ali posvetov;
Is concerned, however, that the EEAS has the biggest proportion of high-graded staff out of all Union institutions, having 514 individuals employed in AD 12 or grades above (over 50 % of all EEAS AD staff), making it difficult to achieve significant reductions in the top-heavy administration; also points out that there are still directorates staffed by as few as 22, 27, or 30 persons and managing directorates with a staff complement of 44; considers that the reversion of this situation could be achieved in the coming years through efficient management policies;
se strinja, da bi moralo splošno sodišče narediti več, da bi zmanjšalo zunanje dejavnosti svojih članov in zaposlenih; poziva Sodišče Evropske unije, naj ravna bolj pregledno in na svojem spletnem mestu objavi seznam zunanjih dejavnosti posameznih sodnikov;
Expresses concern at the excessive number of officials being promoted after two years in a grade, especially the quick promotions in the higher grades; invites the EEAS to establish stricter criteria for the quick promotion in higher grades, especially taking into account the high number of posts at high grades and additional costs that this entails in real terms, and to ensure that the promotions will be fully in line with the Staff Regulations;
zahteva, da Sodišče Evropske unije opravi primerjalno študijo, ki bo vsebovala rezultate primerljivih vrhovnih sodišč v državah članicah in Sodišča Evropske unije;
Considers the responsibilities of the Union Special Representatives (EUSRs) to be very unclear; deeply regrets that information on the use of the budget they receive to implement their mandate continues to be obscure and is concerned that information is not forthcoming unless asked for; expresses concern that the EUSR budget was raised from EUR 15 million in 2011 to EUR 27 million in 2012, especially in light of the fact that the High Representative was planning to do away with EUSRs in 2010; notes that this is an increase of 80 % and that compared with 2011, the EUSR travel budget for 2012 was tripled; calls on the EEAS to provide adequate information on Union Special Representatives’ responsibilities and on their use of the budget;
poudarja, da se utegne v letih, ko se mandat izteče večjemu številu sodnikov, produktivnost še zmanjšati in da bosta nepretrganost in nemotenost dela Sodišča Evropske unije ogroženi, če Svet ne bo podaljšal mandatov starih sodnikov in če bo prišlo do zamude pri imenovanju novih sodnikov;
Calls for an end to the parallel foreign policy pursued through the EUSRs and, in terms of pay, insists that EUSRs should not be treated more favourably than Union ambassadors in post; points out that EUSRs are placed in the highest salary grade, in other words at director-general level, but do not bear the same responsibility as directors-general; calls for EUSR positions to be fully integrated into the EEAS structure; recommends the transfer of the EUSR budget into the EEAS budget;
ugotavlja, da ima Sodišče Evropske unije od vseh institucij Unije največji delež zaposlenih v prevajalski službi, in sicer je kar 47,3 % vseh zaposlenih prevajalcev ali tolmačev; se zaveda obveznosti Sodišča Evropske unije, da postopke izvaja v vseh 24 uradnih jezikih Unije in da vse svoje odločbe prevede v te jezike; je vseeno prepričan, da bi bilo mogoče prevajalsko službo Sodišča Evropske unije racionalizirati;
Notes with satisfaction the performance and management of the interviews conducted and the filling of vacancies; takes note of the overview provided on how often a candidate was invited to interview, as requested by Parliament in the last discharge exercise;
poziva Sodišče Evropske unije, naj uporabi enako metodo za izračun cene za eno stran prevoda kot druge institucije, da bi lahko te cene bolje in bolj enakopravno primerjali med institucijami;
Appreciates the efforts of the EEAS to keep a balance between recruitments from Member States, other institutions and candidates of European Personnel Selection Office competitions; regrets that in the years 2012 and 2013, only one laureate was recruited by the EEAS, while altogether 291 individuals were appointed;
je seznanjen s prednostmi aplikacije e-Curia, ki se je začela uporabljati novembra 2011; z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je po pričakovanjih povečala učinkovitost pri obravnavi zadev;
Expresses concern at the high number of posts at high grades, which is very cost-intensive; welcomes the information provided on new recruitments; requests, however, that the grades of newly recruited management and Head of delegations posts to be also indicated;
je seznanjen s stroški projekta e-Curia in stroški vzdrževanja te aplikacije; pozdravlja izboljšave sistema, pri katerih so bile upoštevane zahteve in predlogi uporabnikov; prosi za podrobne informacije o tekočih posodobitvah sistema in njihovih naknadnih stroških;
Welcomes the increase of external candidates applying for EEAS posts; believes that travel costs incurred relating to the training and selection procedure can be reduced; invites the EEAS to make use of videoconferencing facilities more regularly;
pozdravlja prehod s poročil na papirju na elektronska poročila; ugotavlja, da je aplikacija e-Curia s 1. januarjem 2012 omogočila elektronsko izmenjavo dokumentov iz sodnih postopkov in sodnih odločb med vsemi strankami in sodišči Sodišča Evropske unije; poudarja, da so bila zadnja poročila na papirju izdana pred iztekom leta 2012 in da je prehod z natisnjenih dokumentov na elektronske omogočil precejšnje zmanjšanje proizvodnih stroškov;
Calls on the EEAS to introduce a requirement that newly appointed EEAS staff give a declaration of honour stating that they have not worked for intelligence services in the past;
meni, da je dobra novica, da je imela ob izteku leta 2012 aplikacija e-Curia 1003 aktivne uporabnike, od tega 14 držav članic, dve državi EFTA in pet evropskih institucij (predvsem Parlament, Svet in Komisijo); obžaluje pa, da je nekatere države članice še vedno ne uporabljajo za izmenjavo elektronskih dokumentov s Sodiščem Evropske unije;
Emphasises that competence in the field of foreign affairs must remain the main criterion for hiring decisions; requests that the EEAS develop a coherent human resources strategy that can achieve these goals;
ugotavlja, da je bila v leta 2012 udeležba polna samo na sedmih občnih sejah Sodišča Evropske unije; zahteva, da se dnevni red za ustrezajoče leto teh sej priloži letnim poročilom o dejavnostih;
Reiterates the need to ensure that local agents in delegations are subject to a comprehensive security check prior to employment;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Sodišče Evropske unije sprejelo pravila o dostojanstvu na delovnem mestu, ki veljajo za vse uslužbence v kabinetih sodnikov in drugih službah, vsebujejo pa tudi postopek za obravnavo obtožb o nadlegovanju; poudarja, da je treba nujno zagotoviti najboljše možno delovno okolje za zaposlene in sodnike;
Understands that adjustments of staff in delegations are needed; expects that those arrangements do not impact upon the EEAS’s performance and the credibility of the Union;
je seznanjen s sprejetjem Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 741/2012 o spremembi protokola o statutu Sodišča Evropske unije [7] in s sprejetjem novega poslovnika Sodišča Evropske unije v letu 2012; meni, da bo ta sprememba prispevala k boljšemu izvajanju nalog sodišča; pričakuje, da bo letno poročilo o dejavnostih za leto 2013 vsebovalo podrobne informacije o spremljanju rezultatov te reforme;
Notes with concern that in 2012, 49 % of Heads of Delegation (57 % in 2011) assessed the skills of their operational staff, finance staff, and the monitoring and auditing staff as inadequate to carry out their tasks; reiterates its call to the EEAS and the Commission to provide Parliament with the results of their discussions without delay;
obžaluje, da države članice, ki so se pridružile v zadnjih desetih letih, niso zastopane na ravni generalnih direktorjev in direktorjev te institucije; poudarja, da je potrebna večja geografska uravnoteženost na teh ravneh uprave, podobna tisti na ravni vodij oddelkov;
Supports the efforts of the EEAS to increase the number of available trainings and to encourage attendance of its staff both in Delegations and in Headquarters; is concerned, however, that in 2013 there were about 1000 fewer members of staff attending training courses than in 2012 and the strategic goal of 10 days of training per employee per year was not achieved, having only reached less than four day per employee per year;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da delovna mesta, ustvarjena pri reorganizaciji ob ustanovitvi direktorata knjižnice, niso imela proračunskih posledic;
Draws attention to the cost-intensive procedure of the annual salary adjustment method for local staff in Union delegations; invites the EEAS to consider an alternative calculation method which is more transparent and simple and to report to Parliament’s appropriate committee on that subject;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so bili neposredni stroški slovesnosti ob 60. obletnici Sodišča Evropske unije, ki je potekala leta 2012, minimalni;
Takes note of measures being brought forward to rationalise expenditure concerning staff and staff matters;
podpira politiko Sodišča Evropske unije, ki je dalo prednost uporabi notranjih virov, zlasti v prevajalski službi; poziva ga, naj razmisli o uvedbi prevajanja na zahtevo v določenih primerih, da bi še nadalje zmanjšalo obremenitve zaradi števila dokumentov, ki jih je treba prevesti;
Notes that in 2012, two senior managers at the EEAS were retired in the interests of the service (Article 50 of the Staff Regulations); notes further – with the proviso that the position at the Council cannot be ascertained – that no other Union institution invoked that provision in 2012; points out that officials to whom the above arrangement is applied are entitled to draw a full pension from age 55; calls on the EEAS to inform Parliament of the reasons, the age of the two officials concerned, and the annual costs to be incurred on their account;
je seznanjen z večjimi odhodki za center za predšolske otroke ter za pripravo in distribucijo dokumentov; poziva Sodišče Evropske unije, naj v prihodnjih letih takšna neravnovesja prepreči;