natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 59(2) of the EEA Agreement, public service broadcasters shall not engage in activities which would result in disproportionate distortions of competition that are not necessary for fulfilling the public service mission.
Na podlagi člena 59(2) Sporazuma EGP javne radiotelevizije ne smejo sodelovati v dejavnostih, ki bi lahko povzročile nesorazmerno izkrivljanje konkurence in ki niso potrebne za izpolnjevanje obveznosti javne službe.
For example, the acquisition of premium content as part of the overall public service mission of public service broadcasters is generally considered legitimate.
Na primer, pridobitev posebnih vsebin na splošno šteje kot legitimni del javne službe javnih radiotelevizij.
However, disproportionate market distortions would arise in the event that public service broadcasters were to maintain exclusive premium rights unused without offering to sub-license them in a transparent and timely manner.
Vendar bi nesorazmerno izkrivljanje trga nastalo, če bi javne radiotelevizije ohranile neuporabljene izključne pravice za posebne vsebine, ne da bi zanje pregledno in pravočasno izdale podlicenco.
Therefore, the Authority invites EFTA States to ensure that public service broadcasters respect the principle of proportionality also with regard to the acquisition of premium rights, and to provide rules for the sub-licensing of unused exclusive premium rights by public service broadcasters.
Nadzorni organ zato države Efte poziva, naj zagotovijo, da javne radiotelevizije spoštujejo načelo sorazmernosti tudi glede nakupa posebnih pravic, in naj določijo pravila za izdajanje podlicenc za neuporabljene izključne pravice za posebne vsebine s strani javnih radiotelevizij.
When carrying out commercial activities, public service broadcasters shall be bound to respect market principles and, when they act through commercial subsidiaries, they shall keep arm’s length relations with these subsidiaries.
Pri izvajanju komercialnih dejavnosti morajo javne radiotelevizije spoštovati tržna načela, razmerja med radiotelevizijami in njihovimi komercialnimi podružnicami, če te obstajajo, pa morajo biti v skladu z načelom tržne cene med neodvisnimi strankami.
EFTA States shall ensure that public service broadcasters respect the arm’s length principle, undertake their commercial investments in line with the market economy investor principle, and do not engage in anti-competitive practices with regard to their competitors, based on their public funding.
Države Efte morajo zagotoviti, da javne radiotelevizije spoštujejo načela tržne cene med neodvisnimi strankami, izvajajo komercialne naložbe v skladu z načelom vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu in da zaradi financiranja iz javnih sredstev ne ravnajo protikonkurenčno v zvezi s svojimi konkurenti.
An example of anti-competitive practice may be price undercutting.
Primer protikonkurenčne prakse je lahko nelojalno nižanje cen.
A public service broadcaster might be tempted to depress the prices of advertising or other non-public service activities (such as commercial pay services) below what can reasonably be considered to be market-conform, so as to reduce the revenue of competitors, in so far as the resulting lower revenues are covered by the public compensation.
Javna radiotelevizija bi lahko znižala cene oglaševanja ali skrčila obseg drugih dejavnosti, ki ne spadajo v javno službo (kot so komercialne plačljive storitve) pod ceno, ki bi jo lahko smiselno šteli za tržno, s čimer bi upadli tudi prihodki njenih konkurentov, če bi se posledično nižji prihodki krili iz nadomestila za opravljanje javne službe.
Such conduct cannot be considered as intrinsic to the public service mission attributed to the broadcaster and would in any event affect trading conditions and competition in the European Economic Area to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest and thus infringe Article 59(2) of the EEA Agreement.
Tako ravnanje ne sme veljati za značilno za opravljanje javne službe, ki je bilo zaupano radioteleviziji, in bi vsekakor vplivalo na trgovinske pogoje in konkurenco v Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru do te mere, da bi bilo to v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi ter s tem kršilo člen 59(2) Sporazuma EGP.
In view of the differences between the market situations, respect of market principles by public service broadcasters, in particular the questions as to whether public service broadcasters are undercutting prices in their commercial offering, and whether they are respecting the principle of proportionality with regard to the acquisition of premium rights [52], shall be assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specificities of the market and of the service concerned.
Zaradi razlik v tržnih okoliščinah je treba ob upoštevanju posebnosti trga in zadevnih storitev za vsak primer posebej ocenjevati, ali javne radiotelevizije spoštujejo tržna načela, zlasti pa, ali javne radiotelevizije nelojalno znižujejo cene v svojih komercialnih ponudbah oz. ali spoštujejo načelo sorazmernosti glede nakupa posebnih pravic [52].
The Authority considers that it is, in the first place, up to the national authorities to ensure that public service broadcasters respect market principles.
Nadzorni organ meni, da morajo zlasti nacionalni organi zagotoviti, da javne radiotelevizije spoštujejo tržna načela.
To this end, EFTA States shall have appropriate mechanisms in place which allow assessing any potential complaint in an effective way at the national level.
Zato morajo države Efte vzpostaviti ustrezne mehanizme, ki omogočajo učinkovito ocenjevanje morebitnih pritožb na nacionalni ravni.
Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, where necessary, the Authority may take action on the basis of Articles 53, 54, 59 and 61 of the EEA Agreement.
Ne glede na navedeno v prejšnjem odstavku lahko Nadzorni organ po potrebi ukrepa na podlagi členov 53, 54, 59 in 61 Sporazume EGP.
Temporal application
Časovna omejitev uporabe
This Chapter will be applied from the first day of its adoption by the Authority.
To poglavje se uporablja od prvega dne, ko ga sprejme Nadzorni organ.
It will replace the previous Chapter on the application of the State aid rules to public service broadcasting in the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines.
Nadomestilo bo prejšnje poglavje o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za javno radiodifuzijo iz smernic Nadzornega organa o pomoči.
In accordance with the Chapter on applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid [53], the Authority will apply, in the case of non-notified aid:
V skladu s poglavjem o pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za oceno nezakonite državne pomoči [53], bo Nadzorni organ v primeru nepriglašene pomoči uporabil:
this Chapter, if the aid was granted after its adoption;
to poglavje, če je bila pomoč dodeljena po njegovem sprejetju;
the previous Chapter on the application of the State aid rules to public service broadcasting, adopted on 23 April 2004, in all other cases.
prejšnje poglavje o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za javno radiodifuzijo, sprejeto 23. aprila 2004, v vseh ostalih primerih.
This Chapter corresponds to the Communication from the Commission on the application of State aid rules to public service broadcasting (OJ C 257, 27.10.2009, p. 1).
To poglavje ustreza Sporočilu Komisije o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za javno radiodifuzijo (UL C 257, 27.10.2009, str. 1).
Adopted by Decision No 90/04/COL of 23 April 2004 amending for the 46th time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by introducing a new Chapter 24C: The application of the State aid rules to public service broadcasting (OJ L 327, 13.12.2007, p. 21 and EEA Supplement No 59, 13.12.2007, p. 1).
Sprejeto z Odločbo št. 90/04/COL z dne 23. aprila 2004 o šestinštirideseti spremembi postopkovnih in vsebinskih pravil na področju državne pomoči z uvedbo novega poglavja 24C: Uporaba pravil o državni pomoči za javno radiodifuzijo (UL L 327, 13.12.2007, str. 21, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 59, 13.12.2007, str. 1).
Case C-280/2000 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (Altmark) (2003) ECR I-7747.
Zadeva C-280/2000, Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (Altmark), Recueil 2003, str. I-7747.
OJ L 109, 26.4.2007, p. 44 and EEA Supplement No 20, 26.4.2007, p. 1, also available on the Authority’s website http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=16997&1=1
UL L 109, 26.4.2007, str. 44, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 20, 26.4.2007, p. 1, na voljo tudi na spletni strani Nadzornega organa: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=16997&1=1
Joint Committee Decision No 91/2006 (OJ L 289, 19.10.2006, p. 31 and EEA Supplement No 52, 19.10.2006, p. 24), entry into force on 8.7.2006.
Sklep Skupnega odbora št. 91/2006 z dne 19.10.2006 (UL L 289, 19.10.2006, str. 31, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 52, 18.12.2008), ki je začel veljati 8. julija 2006.
This Communication corresponds to the previous Chapter on the application of State aid rules to public service broadcasting adopted by the Authority on 23 April 2004, see footnote 2 above.
To sporočilo ustreza prejšnjemu poglavju o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za storitve javne radiotelevizije, ki ga je Nadzorni organ sprejel 23. aprila 2004, glej opombo 2.
For the purpose of the present Chapter, the notion ‘audiovisual service(s)’ refers to the linear and/or non-linear distribution of audio and/or audiovisual content and of other neighbouring services such as online text-based information services.
V tem sporočilu „avdiovizualna storitev“ pomeni linearno in/ali nelinearno razširjanje avdio- in/ali avdiovizualne vsebine in drugih sorodnih storitev, kot so spletne tekstovne informacijske storitve.
This notion of ‘audiovisual service(s)’ must be distinguished from the narrower concept of ‘audiovisual media service(s)’, as defined in Article 1(a) of Directive 2007/65/EC (Audiovisual Media Services Directive).
Ta pojem „avdiovizualne storitve“ je treba razlikovati od ožjega pomena pojma „avdiovizualne medijske storitve“, kot je določeno v členu 1(a) Direktive 2007/65/ES (Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah).
Case C-260/89 ERT (1991) ECR I-2925.
Zadeva C-260/89 ERT, Recueil 1991, str. I-2925.
For the purpose of the present Chapter, the term ‘public service’ has to be intended as referring to the term ‘service of general economic interest’ used in Article 59(2) of the EEA Agreement.
V tem poglavju izraz „javna storitev“ ustreza izrazu „storitve splošnega gospodarska interesa“, uporabljenemu v členu 59(2) Sporazuma EGP.
The Resolution concerning public service broadcasting was incorporated to the EEA Agreement as an act which the Contracting Parties shall take note of by Decision No 118/1999 (OJ L 325, 21.12.2000, p. 33 and EEA Supplement No 60, 21.12.2000, p. 423 (Icelandic) and p. 424 (Norwegian)), entry into force on 1.10.1999.
Resolucija v zvezi s storitvami javne radiodifuzije je bila vključena v Sporazum EGP kot akt, s katerim se seznanijo pogodbenice, z Odločbo št. 118/1999 (UL L 325, 21.12.2000, str. 33, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 60, 21.12.2000, str. 423 (islandščina) in str. 424 (norveščina)), začetek veljavnosti: 1. oktober 1999.
Article 6(1) and 6(2)(h) of the Unesco Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions.
Člen 6(1) in 6(2)(h) Unescove Konvencije o varovanju in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnih izrazov.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)2 of the Committee of the Ministers to Member States on media pluralism and diversity of media content, adopted on 31.1.2007 at the 985th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.
Priporočilo CM/Rec(2007)2 Odbora ministrov državam članicam o pluralnosti medijev in raznolikosti medijskih vsebin, sprejeto 31. januarja 2007 na 985. seji namestnikov ministrov.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)3 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the remit of public service media in the information society, adopted on 31.1.2007 at the 985th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.
Priporočilo CM/Rec(2007)3 Odbora ministrov državam članicam o poslanstvu javnih medijev v informacijski družbi, sprejeto 31. januarja 2007 na 985. seji namestnikov ministrov.
For instance, EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 180/09/COL of 31 March 2009 on the aid schemes for audiovisual productions and development of screenplays and educational measures (OJ C 236, 1.10.2009, p. 5 and EEA Supplement No 51, 1.10.2009, p. 17).
Na primer Odločba Nadzornega organa Efte št. 180/09/COL z dne 31. marca 2009 o shemah pomoči za avdiovizualne produkcije ter razvoj scenarijev in izobraževalnih ukrepov (UL C 236, 1.10.2009, str. 5, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 51, 1.10.2009, str. 17).
See also the Chapter on State aid to cinematographic and other audiovisual works of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines, adopted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008 amending, for the 67th time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by amending the existing chapters on reference and discount rates and on State aid granted in the form of guarantees and by introducing a new chapter on recovery of unlawful and incompatible State aid, on State aid to cinematographic and other audiovisual works and State aid for railway undertakings, not published yet, available on the Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=15643&1=1
Glej tudi poglavje o državni pomoči za kinematografska in druga avdiovizualna dela smernic Nadzornega organa o državni pomoči, ki jih je Nadzorni organ Efte sprejel z Odločbo št. 788/08/COL z dne 17. decembra 2008 o sedeminšestdeseti spremembi postopkovnih in vsebinskih pravil na področju državne pomoči s spremembo obstoječih poglavij o referenčnih in diskontnih stopnjah in državni pomoči, ki se odobri v obliki garancij, ter z uvedbo novega poglavja o izterjavi nezakonite in nezdružljive državne pomoči, o državni pomoči za kinematografska in druga avdiovizualna dela in državni pomoči za prevoznike v železniškem prometu, še ni objavljeno, na voljo na spletni strani Nadzornega organa: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=15643&1=1
Joint Committee Decision No 55/2007 (OJ L 266, 11.10.2007, p. 15 and EEA Supplement No 48, 11.10.2007, p. 12), entry into force on 9.6.2007.
Sklep Skupnega odbora št. 55/2007, UL L 266, 11.10.2007, str. 15, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 48, 11.10.2007, str. 12, ki je začel veljati 9. junija 2007.
According to Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2005/842/EC, it applies to State aid in the form of ‘public service compensation granted to undertakings with an average annual turnover before tax, all activities included, of less than EUR 100 million during the two financial years preceding that in which the service of general economic interest was assigned, which receive annual compensation for the service in question of less than EUR 30 million’.
Na podlagi člena 2(1)(a) Odločbe 2005/842/ES se ta uporablja za državno pomoč, ki je „nadomestilo za javne storitve, dodeljeno podjetjem, katerih povprečni letni promet pred obdavčitvijo, ki vključuje vse dejavnosti, ne presega 100 milijonov EUR v obdobju dveh finančnih let pred letom, v katerem je bila dodeljena storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, in letno nadomestilo za zadevno storitev ne presega 30 milijonov EUR“.
Joined Cases T-309/04, T-317/04, T-329/04 and T-336/04 TV2/Danmark v Commission (TV2) (2008) ECR II-2935, paragraph 156.
Glej sodbo v združenih zadevah T-309/04, T-317/04, T-329/04 in T-336/04, TV2/Danmark proti Komisiji (TV2), ZOdl 2008, str. II-2935, točka 156.
Regarding the qualification of licence fee funding as State resources, see TV2 judgment, cited above, paragraphs 158–159.
Glede kvalificiranja financiranja iz naročnine kot državnih sredstev glej sodbo TV2, navedeno zgoraj, točki 158 in 159.
Cases C-730/79 Philip Morris Holland v Commission (1980) ECR 2671, paragraph 11; C-303/88 Italy v Commission (1991) ECR I-1433, paragraph 27; C-156/98 Germany v Commission (2000) ECR I-6857, paragraph 33.
Zadeve C-730/79, Philip Morris Holland proti Komisiji, Recueil 1980, str. 2671, točka 11; C–303/88, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1991, str. I-1433, točka 27; C–156/98, Nemčija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2000, str. I–6857, točka 33.
C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit SA v Office National du Ducroire and the Belgian State (1994) ECR I-3829.
C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit SA proti Office National du Ducroire in državi Belgiji, Recueil 1994, str. I-3829.
See, for example, the decisions of the Commission in the following cases: E 8/06, State funding for Flemish public service broadcaster VRT (OJ C 143, 10.6.2008, p. 7); E 4/05, State aid financing of RTE and TNAG (TG4) (OJ C 121, 17.5.2008, p. 5); E 9/05, Licence fee payments to RAI (OJ C 235, 23.9.2005, p. 3); E 10/2005, Licence fee payments to France 2 and 3 (OJ C 240, 30.9.2005, p. 20); E 8/05, Spanish national public service broadcaster RTVE (OJ C 239, 4.10.2006, p. 17); C 2/04, Ad hoc financing of Dutch public broadcasters (OJ L 49, 22.2.2008, p. 1); C 60/99, Commission Decision 2004/838/EC of 10 December 2003 on State aid implemented by France for France 2 and France 3 (OJ L 361, 8.12.2004, p. 21); C 62/99, Commission Decision 2004/339/EC of 15 October 2003 on the measures implemented by Italy for RAI SpA (OJ L 119, 23.4.2004, p. 1); NN 88/98, Financing of a 24-hour advertising-free news channel with licence fee by the BBC (OJ C 78, 18.3.2000, p. 6) and NN 70/98, State aid to public broadcasting channels Kinderkanal and Phoenix (OJ C 238, 21.8.1999, p. 3).
Glej na primer odločitve Komisije v zadevah: E 8/06, Državna sredstva za flamsko javno radiotelevizijo VRT (UL C 143, 10.6.2008, str. 7); E 4/05, Državna pomoč za financiranje RTE in TNAG (TG4) (UL C 121, 17.5.2008, str. 5); E 9/05, Plačilo licenc za RAI (UL C 235, 23.9.2005, str. 3); E 10/2005, Plačilo licenc za France 2 in 3, UL C 240, 30.9.2005, str. 20; E 8/05, Španska nacionalna radiotelevizija RTVE (UL C 239, 4.10.2006, str. 17); C 2/04, Enkratno financiranje nizozemskih javnih radiotelevizij (UL L 49, 22.2.2008, str. 1); C 60/99, Odločba Komisije2004/838/ES z dne 10. decembra 2003 o državni pomoči Francije za France 2 in France 3 (UL L 361, 8.12.2004, str. 21); C 62/99, Odločba Komisije 2004/339/ES z dne 15. oktobra 2003 o ukrepih Italije v korist RAI SpA (UL L 119, 23.4.2004, str. 1); NN 88/98, Financiranje 24-urnega programa poročil brez oglasov z naročnino s strani BBC (UL C 78, 18.3.2000, str. 6), in NN 70/98, Državna pomoč javnima radiotelevizijskima programoma Kinderkanal in Phoenix (UL C 238, 21.8.1999, str. 3).
Joined Cases T-195/01 and T-207/01 Government of Gibraltar v Commission (Gibraltar) (2002) ECR II-2309.
Združeni zadevi T-195/01 in T-207/01, Vlada Gibraltarja proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. II-2309.
For example, Commission Decisions NN 88/98, BBC 24-hours (OJ C 78, 18.3.2000, p. 6) and NN 70/98, Kinderkanal and Phoenix, cited above.
Na primer odločbi Komisije NN 88/98, BBC 24-ur (UL C 78, 18.3.2000, str. 6) in NN 70/98, Kinderkanal in Phoenix (UL C 238, 21.8.1999), navedeni zgoraj.
NN 70/98, Kinderkanal and Phoenix, cited above.
Odločba NN 70/98, Kinderkanal in Phoenix, navedena zgoraj.
Case 172/80 Zuechner (1981) ECR 2021.
Zadeva 172/80, Zuechner, Recueil 1981, str. 2021.
Case C-242/95 GT-Link (1997) ECR 4449.
Zadeva C-242/95, GT-Link, Recueil 1997, str. 4449.
Case C-159/94 EDF and GDF (1997) ECR I-5815.
Zadeva C-159/94 EDF in GDF, Recueil 1997, str. I-5815.
See, for example, the decisions of the Commission in the following cases: E 8/06, State funding for Flemish public service broadcaster VRT (OJ C 143, 10.6.2008, p. 7); E 4/05, State aid financing of RTE and TNAG (TG4) (OJ C 121, 17.5.2008, p. 5); E 3/05, Aid to the German public service broadcasters (OJ C 185, 8.8.2007, p. 1); E 9/05, Licence fee payments to RAI (OJ C 235, 23.9.2005, p. 3); E 10/05, Licence fee payments to France 2 and 3 (OJ C 240, 30.9.2005, p. 20); E 8/05, Spanish national public service broadcaster RTVE (OJ C 239, 4.10.2006, p. 17); C 2/04, Ad hoc financing of Dutch public service broadcasters (OJ L 49, 22.2.2008, p. 1).
Glej na primer odločitve Komisije v zadevah: E 8/06, Državna sredstva za flamsko javno radiotelevizijo VRT (UL C 143, 10.6.2008, str. 7); E 4/05, Državna pomoč za financiranje RTE in TNAG (TG4) (UL C 121, 17.5.2008, str. 5); E 3/05, Pomoč nemškim javnim radiotelevizijam (UL C 185, 8.8.2007, str. 1); E 9/05, Plačilo licenc za RAI (UL C 235, 23.9.2005, str. 3); E 10/05, Plačilo licenc za France 2 in 3 (UL C 240, 30.9.2005, str. 20); E 8/05, Španska nacionalna radiotelevizija RTVE (UL C 239, 4.10.2006, str. 17); C 2/04, Enkratno financiranje nizozemskih javnih radiotelevizij (UL L 49, 22.2.2008, str. 1).
See also EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 306/09/COL of 8 July 2009 on the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation, available on the Authority’s website http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=16906&1=1
Glej tudi Odločbo Nadzornega organa Efte št. 306/09/COL z dne 8. julija 2009 o norveški državni radiotelevizijski družbi, na voljo na spletni strani Nadzornega organa: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=16906&1=1
Similar difficulties may also be encountered when public service broadcasting is addressed to linguistic minorities or to local needs.
Podobne težave lahko nastanejo tudi, ko je storitev javne radiodifuzije namenjena jezikovnim manjšinam in lokalnim potrebam.
Commission Decision C 62/1999, RAI, paragraph 99 and C 85/2001, RTP, paragraph 158.
Odločba Komisije C62/1999 RAI, odstavek 99, in C85/2001 RTP, odstavek 158.
Case T-442/03 SIC v Commission (2008) ECR II-1161, paragraph 201 and TV2 judgment, cited above, paragraphs 122–124.
Zadeva T-442/03, SIC proti Komisiji, Zodl. 2008, str. II-1161, točka 201, in sodba TV2, navedena zgoraj, točke 122–124.
These qualitative criteria are according to the General Court ‘the justification for the existence of broadcasting SGEIs in the national audiovisual sector’.
Po mnenju Splošnega sodišča so ta kvalitativna merila „smisel obstoja službe splošnega gospodarskega pomena radiotelevizije v nacionalni avdiovizualni podobi“.
There is ‘no reason for a widely defined broadcasting SGEI which sacrifices compliance with those qualitative requirements in order to adopt the conduct of a commercial operator’, see SIC v Commission, cited above, paragraph 211.
Ni „razlogov, da bi bila služba splošnega gospodarskega pomena radiotelevizije sicer široko opredeljena, a se izpolnjevanje teh kakovostnih zahtev žrtvuje v korist gospodarske dejavnosti izdajatelja“, glej zadevo SIC proti Komisiji, navedeno zgoraj, točka 211.
Regarding the qualification of prize games, including the dialling of a premium rate number as teleshopping or advertising, under the Directive 2007/65/EC (Audiovisual Media Services Directive), see Case C-195/06 Österreichischer Rundfunk (ORF) (2007) ECR I-8817.
Za kvalificiranje nagradnih iger, vključno s klicanjem na plačljivo telefonsko številko, na primer televizijsko prodajo ali oglaševanje v skladu z Direktivo 2007/65/ES (direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah), glej zadevo C-195/06, Österreichischer Rundfunk (ORF), Recueil 2007, str. I-8817.
See TV2 judgment, cited above, paragraphs 107–108.
Glej sodbo TV2, navedeno zgoraj, točki 107 in 108.
See Case SIC v Commission, cited above, paragraph 212.
Glej zadevo SIC proti Komisiji, navedeno zgoraj, točka 212.
Article 4 of Directive 2006/111/EC (Transparency Directive).
Člen 4 Direktive 2006/111/ES (direktiva o preglednosti).
This implies reference to the hypothetical situation in which the non-public service activities were to be discontinued: the costs that would be so avoided represent the amount of common costs to be allocated to non-public service activities.
To se nanaša na hipotetično možnost, da se dejavnosti, ki ne spadajo v javno službo, prekinejo: stroški, ki bi bili s tem prihranjeni, pomenijo znesek skupnih stroškov, ki se razporedijo dejavnostim, ki ne spadajo v javno službo.
Of course, this provision does not preclude public service broadcasters from earning profits with their commercial activities outside the public service remit.
Ta določba seveda javnim radiotelevizijam ne onemogoča, da bi ustvarile dobiček s komercialnimi dejavnostmi, ki ne spadajo v obveznost opravljanja javne službe.