natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Public funding for the provision of an SGEI does not entail a selective advantage within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement if the following four conditions are met: (a) the beneficiary of a State funding mechanism for an SGEI must be formally entrusted with the provision and discharge of an SGEI, the obligations of which must be clearly defined (b) the parameters for calculating the compensation must be established beforehand in an objective and transparent manner; (c) the compensation cannot exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in the discharge of the SGEI, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging those obligations and (d) where the beneficiary is not chosen pursuant to a public procurement procedure, that allows for the provision of the service at the least cost to the community, the level of compensation granted must be determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs which a typical undertaking, well run, would have incurred in discharging those obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit.
Glej točko 52 sodbe v zadevi Stardust Marine.
See footnote 21.
Glej točki 55 in 56 sodbe v zadevi Stardust Marine.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 360/2012 of 25 April 2012 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid granted to undertakings providing services of general economic interest (OJ L 114, 26.4.2012, p. 8), incorporarted into point 1ha of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement by Joint Committee Decision No 225/2012 of 7 December 2012 (OJ L 81, 21.3.2013, p. 27 and EEA Supplement No 18, 21.3.2013, p. 32),
Zadeva 78/76, Steinike & Weinlig proti Nemčiji, Recueil 1977, str. 595, točka 21.
Commission Decision 2012/21/EU of 20 December 2011 on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3), incorporarted into point 1h of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement by Joint Committee Decision No 66/2012 of 30 March 2012 (OJ L 207, 2.8.2012, p. 46 and EEA Supplement No 43, 2.8.2012, p. 56).
Zadeva C-310/99, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str.
Framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (OJ L 161, 13.6.2013, p. 12 and EEA Supplement No 34, 13.6.2013, p. 1).
I-2289, točka 65.
Case T-289/03 British United Provident Association Ltd (BUPA) v Commission [2008], ECR II-81, paragraphs 171 and 224.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (sodba v zadevi Altmark), Recueil 2003, str.
See Joined Cases T-204/97 and T-270/97 EPAC — Empresa para a Agroalimentação e Cereais, SA v Commission [2000] ECR II-2267, paragraph 126 and Case T-17/02 Fred Olsen, SA v Commission [2005] ECR II-2031, paragraphs 186, 188-189.
I-7747.
See SGEI Communication, paragraph 45.
Glej točke 77 do 82 sodbe v zadevi Altmark.
See decision N 381/04 — France, Project for a high capacity telecommunications network in the Pyrénées-Atlantiques (DORSAL) (OJ C 162, 2.7.2005, p. 5).
Sodba v zadevi Stardust Marine, točka 71.
Articles 16, 17 and 18.
Zadeva C-124/10 P, Evropska komisija proti EDF, ZOdl.
Both origin and destination airports must be clearly identified see Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
2012, še neobjavljena, točke 84, 85 in 105.
In particular, the Authority considers that it would be difficult to justify PSOs on a route to a given airport if there are already similar services notably in terms of transport time, frequencies, level and quality of service, to another airport serving the same catchment area.
Zadeve T-129/95, T-2/96 in T-97/96, Neue Maxhütte Stahlwerke in Lech Stahlwerke proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str.
See point 70 and Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, recital 12 and articles 16 to 18.
II-17, točka 120.
This threshold refers to a one-way count, that is to say, a passenger flying from the airport and back to the airport would be counted twice.
Glej tudi zadevo C-40/85, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1986, str. 02321, točka 13.
If an airport is part of a group of airports, the passenger volume is established on the basis of each individual airport.
Sodba v zadevi Stardust Marine, točka 69.
This threshold refers to a one-way count, that is to say, a passenger flying to the island and back would be counted twice.
Glej tudi zadevo C-303/88, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1991, str.
It applies to individual routes between an airport on the island and an airport on the mainland.
I-1433, točka 20.
See for instance Case C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 78 and Case C-333/07 Régie Networks v Rhone Alpes Bourgogne [2008] ECR I-10807, paragraphs 94–116.
Zadeva C-305/89, Italija proti Komisiji (sodba v zadevi Alfa Romeo), Recueil 1991, str.
See Case C-225/91 Matra v Commission, [1993] ECR I-3203, paragraph 42.
I-1603, točka 20.
Between 70 % and 90 % of the airport's costs are fixed.
Zadeva T-228/99, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str.
The categories of airports for the purposes of these guidelines are based on the available industry data.
II-435, točke 250 do 270.
This does not preclude foreseeing that future benefits may offset initial losses.
Glej Sklep Komisije v zadevi C-25/07 – Finska – Letališče Tampere Pirkkala in družba Ryanair (UL L 309, 19.11.2013, str. 27).
Financing of such activities is not covered by these guidelines, as they are of a non-transport character, and will thus be assessed on the basis of the relevant sectoral and general rules.
Zadeva C-124/10 P, Komisija proti EDF, ZOdl.
The principles set out in these guidelines do not apply to aid for the provision of ground handling services regardless whether they are provided by the airport itself, by an airline or by a supplier of ground handling services to third parties; such aid will be assessed on the basis of the relevant general rules.
2012, še neobljavljena, točke 84, 85 in 105.
Actual average annual passenger traffic during the 2 financial years preceding that in which the aid is notified or actually granted or paid in the case of non-notified aid.
Glej tudi zadevo C-40/85, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1986, str. 02321, točka 13.
In the case of a newly created passenger airport, the forecasted average annual passenger traffic during the 2 financial years after the beginning of the operation of commercial passenger air traffic should be considered.
Ustrezne določbe vključujejo člena 53 in 54 Sporazuma EGP ter Direktivo 2009/12/ES.
These thresholds refer to a one-way count.
Glej Sklep Komisije v zadevi C-12/08 – Slovaška – Sporazum med letališčem Bratislava in družbo Ryanair (UL L 27, 1.2.2011, str. 24) in Sklep Komisije v zadevi C-25/07 – Finska – Letališče Tampere Pirkkala in družba Ryanair (UL L 309, 19.11.2013, str. 27).
This means a passenger flying, for example, to the airport and back would be counted twice; it applies to individual routes.
Razumna stopnja dobička je „običajna“ stopnja donosa kapitala, tj. stopnja donosa, ki bi jo zahtevalo povprečno podjetje za naložbo ali podobno tveganje.
See Section 5.1.1(a).
Donos se izmeri kot metoda notranje stopnje donosa predvidenih denarnih tokov, nastalih zaradi dogovora z letalskim prevoznikom.
If the aid were to be determined on the basis of ex post calculations (making good for any deficits as they arise), airports might not have much incentive to contain costs and charge airport charges that are adequate to cover costs.
To ne izključuje predvidevanja, da lahko prihodnji zaslužki v obdobju trajanja dogovorov izravnajo začetne izgube.
References to ‘the date of publication’ in these guidelines means the date of publication on the website of the Authority.
Prav tako se bo upoštevala vsaka javna podpora, kot so na primer dogovori o trženju, neposredno sklenjeni med javnimi organi in letalskim prevoznikom, za nadomestitev dela normalnih stroškov, ki jih ima letališče v zvezi z dogovorom letališča/letalskega prevoznika.
In the case of a newly created passenger airport the forecasted average annual passenger traffic during the 2 financial years after the beginning of the operation of commercial passenger air traffic should be considered.
To ni povezano s tem, ali je taka podpora neposredno odobrena zadevnemu letalskemu prevozniku ali usmerjena prek letališča ali drugega subjekta.
This means a passenger flying for example to the airport and back would be counted twice; it applies to individual routes.
Sodba v zadevi Charleroi, točka 59.
See also point 91.
Kar je navedeno v tem odstavku o letalskih prevoznikih, velja tudi za druge uporabnike letališča.
The 50 % intensity corresponds to the funding gap over 10 years for an airport which, starting from the initial operating cost coverage at the beginning of the transition period, achieves full operating cost coverage after 10 years.
Glej zlasti združeni zadevi T-443/08 in T-455/08, Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG in Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Actual average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years preceding that in which the aid is notified or actually granted or paid in the case of non-notified aid.
2011, str.
In the case of a newly created passenger airport, the forecasted average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years after the beginning of the operation of commercial passenger air traffic should be considered.
II-1311, točka 109.
Decision 2006/682/EC of the Council and of the Representatives of the Member States of the European Union meeting within the Council of 9 June 2006 on the signature and provisional application of the Multilateral Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, the Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Iceland, the Republic of Montenegro, the Kingdom of Norway, Romania, the Republic of Serbia and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) (OJ L 285, 16.10.2006, p. 1).
Glej točke 86 do 93 sodbe v zadevi Altmark.
See also footnote 93.
Javno financiranje za zagotavljanje SSGP ne pomeni selektivne prednosti v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP, če so izpolnjeni naslednji štirje pogoji: (a) upravičenec do mehanizma državnega financiranja za SSGP mora biti uradno pooblaščen za opravljanje SSGP, te obveznosti pa morajo biti jasno opredeljene; (b) merila za izračun nadomestila morajo biti določena vnaprej ter objektivno in pregledno; (c) nadomestilo ne sme presegati tistega, kar je potrebno za kritje vseh ali dela stroškov, ki so nastali z izpolnjevanjem obveznosti SSGP, ob upoštevanju realiziranih prejemkov in razumnega dobička zaradi izpolnjevanja teh obveznosti ter (d) če upravičenec ni izbran s postopkom oddaje javnega naročila, ki omogoča najmanjše stroške zagotavljanja storitve skupnosti, se mora raven odobrenega nadomestila določiti na podlagi analize stroškov, ki bi jih povprečno, dobro vodeno podjetje imelo pri izpolnjevanju teh obveznosti ob upoštevanju realiziranih prejemkov in razumnega dobička.
See for example, as regards the assessment of aid of a social character granted to individual consumers, Commission decision of 16 May 2006, N 169/2006 — United Kingdom — Aid of social character air services in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland (OJ C 272, 9.11.2006, p. 10); Commission decision of 11 December 2007, N 471/2007 — Portugal — Social allowances to passengers residing in the Autonomous Region of Madeira and students, in air transport services between mainland Portugal and the Autonomous Region (OJ C 46, 19.2.2008, p. 2); and Commission decision of 5 January 2011, N 426/2010 — France — Aid of a social character for certain categories of passenger on air services between La Réunion and metropolitan France (OJ C 71, 5.3.2011, p. 5).
Glej opombo 21.
Available at http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/legal-framework/procedural-rules/
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 360/2012 z dne 25. aprila 2012 o uporabi členov 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pri pomoči de minimis za podjetja, ki opravljajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena (UL L 114, 26.4.2012, str. 8), vključena v točko 1ha Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP s Sklepom Skupnega odbora št. 225/2012 z dne 7. decembra 2012 (UL L 81, 21.3.2013, str. 27, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 18, 21.3.2013, str. 32).
This information should be regularly updated (e.g. every 6 months) and should be available in non-proprietary formats.
Sklep Komisije 2012/21/EU z dne 20. decembra 2011 o uporabi člena 106(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljenega nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (UL L 7, 11.1.2012, str. 3), vključen v točko 1h Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP s Sklepom Skupnega odbora št. 66/2012 z dne 30. marca 2012 (UL L 207, 2.8.2012, str. 46, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 43, 2.8.2012, str. 56).
Such a common methodology may be provided by the Authority.
Okvir za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve (UL L 161, 13.6.2013, str. 12, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 34, 13.6.2013, str. 1).
Applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid (OJ L 73, 19.3.2009, p. 23 and EEA Supplement No 15, 19.3.2009, p. 1).
Zadeva T-289/03, British United Provident Association Ltd (BUPA) proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
APPENDIX
2008, str.
SUMMARY OF THE COMPATIBILITY CONDITIONS
II-81, točki 171 in 224.
Table 1
Glej združeni zadevi T-204/97 in T-270/97, EPAC – Empresa para a Agroalimentação e Cereais, SA proti Komisiji, Recueil 2000, str.
Overview of compatibility conditions for aid to airports
II-2267, točka 126, in zadevo T-17/02, Fred Olsen, SA proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Compatibility conditions
2005, str.
Investment aid to the airport
II-2031, točke 186, 188 in 189.
Operating aid to the airport
Glej odstavek 45 sporočila o SSGP.
Increasing mobility by establishing access points for intra-EEA flights
Glej Sklep N 381/04 – Francija, Projekt telekomunikacijskega omrežja s hitrim prenosom v departmaju Pyrénées-Atlantiques (DORSAL) (UL C 162, 2.7.2005, str. 5).
Combating congestion at major hubs
Členi 16, 17 in 18.
Facilitating regional development
Jasno je treba opredeliti tako začetno kot ciljno letališče; glej člen 16(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008.
Duplication of airports and unused capacity in absence of satisfactory medium-term prospects for use does not contribute to a well-defined objective of common interest.
Nadzorni organ zlasti meni, da bi bilo težko upravičiti obveznosti javne službe na ruti do danega letališča, če že obstajajo podobne storitve, predvsem v smislu časa prevoza, pogostosti, ravni in kakovosti storitve, do drugega letališča, ki se izvajajo za isto ciljno območje.
< 3 million passengers
Glej točko 70 ter uvodno izjavo 12 in člene 16 do 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008.
> 3–5 million passengers under certain case-specific circumstances
Ta prag se nanaša na štetje po številu potovanj v eno smer, kar pomeni, da se potnik, ki leti z letališča in nazaj na to letališče, šteje dvakrat.
> 5 million passengers only in very exceptional circumstances
Če je dano letališče del skupine letališč, se število potnikov ugotovi na podlagi vsakega posameznega letališča.
Appropriateness of the aid measure
Ta prag se nanaša na štetje po številu potovanj v eno smer, kar pomeni, da se potnik, ki leti na otok in nazaj, šteje dvakrat.
The aid measure must be an appropriate policy instrument to address the objective of common interest
To velja za posamezne rute med letališčem na otoku in letališčem na celini.
Consideration of less distortive aid instruments (guarantees, soft loans, etc.)
Glej na primer zadevo C-156/98, Nemčija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2000, str.
Ex ante as a fixed sum covering the expected funding gap of operating costs (determined on the basis of an ex ante business plan) during a 10-year transitional period.
I-6857, točka 78, in zadevo C-333/07, Régie Networks proti Rhone Alpes Bourgogne, ZOdl.
Incentive effect
2008, str.
Present, if the investment would not have been undertaken or to a different extent (counterfactual or funding gap analysis based on ex ante business plan)
I-10807, točke 94 do 116.
Present, if the level of economic activity of the airport would be significantly reduced in its absence
Glej zadevo C-225/91, Matra proti Komisiji, Recueil 1993, str.
Proportionality of the aid (aid limited to the minimum)
I-3203, točka 42.
Eligible costs:
Od 70 % do 90 % stroškov letališča je fiksnih.
Costs relating to investments in airport infrastructure and equipment, except investment costs for non-aeronautical activities
Kategorije letališč so v teh smernicah določene na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov te gospodarske panoge.
Operating funding gap of the airport
To ne izključuje predvidevanja, da lahko prihodnji zaslužki izravnajo začetne izgube.
Maximum permissible aid intensities:
Financiranje takih dejavnosti v teh smernicah ni zajeto, ker te dejavnosti niso povezane s prometom, in se bodo zato ocenile na podlagi ustreznih sektorskih in splošnih pravil.
> 3–5 million
Načela v teh smernicah ne veljajo za pomoč za zagotavljanje storitev zemeljske oskrbe, ne glede na to, ali jih tretjim stranem zagotavlja letališče samo, letalski prevoznik ali dobavitelj storitev zemeljske oskrbe; taka pomoč se bo ocenila na podlagi ustreznih splošnih pravil.
up to 25 %
Dejanski povprečni letni potniški promet v dveh finančnih letih pred letom, v katerem je pomoč priglašena ali dejansko dodeljena ali plačana, če gre za nepriglašeno pomoč.
During the transitional period: 50 % of the initial average operating funding gap calculated as average of 5 years preceding the transitional period (2009-2013)
V primeru, da se ustvari novo potniško letališče, je treba upoštevati napovedan povprečni letni potniški promet v dveh finančnih letih pred začetkom izvajanja komercialnega potniškega zračnega prometa.
After transitional period of 10 years: no operating aid allowed (except if granted under horizontal rules)
Ti pragi se nanašajo na štetje po številu potovanj v eno smer.
up to 50 %
Glej oddelek 5.1.1(a).
up to 75 %
Če bi se pomoč določala na podlagi naknadnih izračunov (z nadomestitvijo morebitnih primanjkljajev, ki nastanejo), letališča morda ne bi imela veliko spodbude, da bi omejila stroške in zaračunala ustrezne letališke pristojbine za pokritje stroškov.
Exceptions:
„Datum objave“ v teh smernicah pomeni datum objave na spletišču Nadzornega organa.
For airports located in remote regions (irrespective of their size): the maximum aid intensities for investment aid to finance airport infrastructure may be increased by up to 20 %
V primeru, da se ustvari novo potniško letališče, je treba upoštevati napovedan povprečni letni potniški promet v dveh finančnih letih pred začetkom izvajanja komercialnega potniškega zračnega prometa.
For airports < 1 million passengers per annum located in a peripheral region: intensity may exceed 75 % in exceptional circumstances subject to case-by-case assessment In case of relocation: proportionality, necessity and maximum aid intensity will be assessed regardless of average traffic
To pomeni, da se potnik, ki leti na primer na letališče in nazaj, šteje dvakrat; to velja za posamezne rute.
For airports over 5 million passengers per annum: only under very exceptional circumstances, characterised by a clear market failure and taking into account the magnitude of the investment and the competition distortions
Glej tudi točko 91.
For airports < 700000 passengers per annum: 80 % of the initial average operating funding gap for 5 years after the beginning of the transitional period
dstotna intenzivnost ustreza vrzeli v financiranju v 10 letih na letališču, ki od prvotnega kritja stroškov poslovanja na začetku prehodnega obdobja dosega kritje celotnih stroškov poslovanja po 10 letih.
Avoidance of undue negative effects on competition and trade between EEA States
Dejanski povprečni letni potniški promet v dveh finančnih letih pred letom, v katerem je pomoč priglašena ali dejansko dodeljena ali plačana, če gre za nepriglašeno pomoč.
Open to all potential users and not dedicated to one specific user
V primeru, da se ustvari novo potniško letališče, je treba upoštevati napovedan povprečni letni potniški promet v dveh finančnih letih pred začetkom izvajanja komercialnega potniškega zračnega prometa.
Airports < 5 million passengers per annum: upfront fixed amount or annual instalments to compensate for capital cost funding gap resulting from airport business plan
Sklep 2006/682/ES Sveta in predstavnikov držav članic Evropske unije, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta dne 9. junija 2006, o podpisu in začasni uporabi Večstranskega sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami, Republiko Albanijo, Republiko Bolgarijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Republiko Črno goro, Republiko Hrvaško, Republiko Islandijo, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Kraljevino Norveško, Romunijo, Republiko Srbijo in Začasno upravo misije Združenih narodov na Kosovu o vzpostavitvi skupnega evropskega zračnega prostora (ECAA) (UL L 285, 16.10.2006, str. 1).
Assessment of distortion of competition and effect on trade
Glej tudi opombo 93.
Airports < 700000 passengers per annum: reassessed 4 years after the beginning of the transitional period
V zvezi z oceno pomoči socialnega značaja, dodeljeno posameznim potrošnikom, glej na primer Sklep Komisije N 169/06 z dne 16. maja 2006 – Združeno kraljestvo – Pomoč socialnega značaja za zračne storitve v škotskem višavju in na otokih (UL C 272, 9.11.2006, str. 10), Sklep Komisije N 471/07 z dne 11. decembra 2007 – Portugalska – Socialni dodatki za potnike, ki prebivajo v avtonomni regiji Madeira, in študente v storitvah zračnega prometa med celinsko Portugalsko in avtonomno regijo (UL C 46, 19.2.2008, str. 2) in Sklep Komisije N 426/10 z dne 5. januarja 2011 – Francija – Pomoč socialnega značaja za določene kategorije potnikov, ki uporabljajo zračne storitve med Réunionom in celinsko Francijo (UL C 71, 5.3.2011, str. 5).
Aid schemes:
Na voljo na http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/legal-framework/procedural-rules/.
airports < 3 million passengers per annum
Te informacije bi bilo treba redno posodabljati (na primer vsakih šest mesecev) in bi morale biti na voljo v splošno dostopnem formatu.
Individual notifications:
Tako skupno metodologijo lahko zagotovi Nadzorni organ.
airports > 3 million passengers per annum
Veljavna pravila za oceno nezakonite državne pomoči (UL L 73, 19.3.2009, str. 23, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 15, 19.3.2009, str. 1).
investment aid to an airport < 1 million passengers per annum exceeding 75 % aid intensity
DODATEK
investment aid granted for the relocation of airports
POVZETEK POGOJEV ZDRUŽLJIVOSTI
mixed passenger/freight airports > 200000 tonnes of freight during two financial years preceding the notification year
Preglednica 1
creation of a new passenger airport (including conversion of existing airfield)
Pregled pogojev združljivosti za pomoč letališčem
creation or development of an airport located within 100 kilometres or 60 minutes' travelling time from an existing airport
Pogoji združljivosti
mixed passenger/freight airports > 200000 tonnes of freight during 2 financial years preceding the notification year
Pomoč za naložbe letališčem
operating aid to an airport within 100 kilometres or 60 minutes' travelling time from other airports
Pomoč letališčem za tekoče poslovanje
Table 2
povečanje mobilnosti z določitvijo točk dostopa do poletov znotraj EGP
Overview of compatibility conditions for start-up aid to airlines
boj proti preobremenjenosti na velikih vozliščih
No duplication of existing comparable connection operated by a high-speed rail service or by another airport in the same catchment area under comparable conditions
spodbujanje regionalnega razvoja
Airports < 3 million passengers per annum
Podvajanje letališč in neizkoriščena zmogljivost, pri čemer ni zadovoljive srednjeročne možnosti uporabe, ne prispevata k natančno opredeljenemu cilju skupnega interesa.
Airports located in remote regions irrespective of their size
< 3 milijoni potnikov