natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Authority notes that within the field of education, the Contracting Parties do not only have a considerable degree of discretion in deciding on the objective of their tasks, but also in determining how to fulfil that objective.
Kljub temu Sodišče Efte opozarja, da lahko pomanjkanje informacij v zvezi s tem, kako so okrajni organi organizirali sodelovanje, da bi zagotovili skladnost s svojimi obveznostmi zagotavljanja učnega gradiva v fazi ad hoc sodelovanja podjetja NDLA, vpliva na razvrstitev dejavnosti kot negospodarskih dejavnosti.
The Norwegian authorities have opted to keep the NDLA website open.
Sodišče je zato poudarilo, da bi Nadzorni organ moral izvesti preiskavo učinka spremembe pravnega statusa na postopek sprejemanja odločitev znotraj podjetja NDLA [82].
The effect of that decision is that the distribution of the digital learning materials is not limited to the pupils enrolled at the relevant schools in the relevant counties.
Struktura upravljanja subjekta NDLA se ob pretvorbi subjekta v medobčinsko sodelovanje v skladu z Zakonom o lokalni samoupravi ni spremenila [83].
However, the spread of knowledge beyond the immediate circle of indented addressees is a common practice in European teaching traditions.
Prav tako se nista spremenila obseg pooblastil podjetja NDLA in njegov postopek sprejemanja odločitev.
Indeed, lectures at European public universities are commonly open to the general public and universities regularly provide audio and audiovisual representations of lectures online.
Na podlagi tega se ni spremenil obseg pooblastil podjetja NDLA na področju sprejemanja odločitev.
These practices can be seen as an extension of the education mission that do not automatically entail that the activities are economic in nature.
Nadzorni organ je primerjal strukturo podjetja NDLA v fazi ad hoc sodelovanja [84] s strukturo podjetja v fazi medobčinskega sodelovanja [85], pri čemer ni ugotovil nobenih pomembnih razlik.
In fact, in this particular case, the learning material forms the basis and the framework for teaching.
V obeh fazah je bil cilj podjetja NDLA razvoj in ponudba brezplačnega digitalnega učnega gradiva za vse predmete, ki se poučujejo v višji srednji šoli [86].
This is also underlined by the fact that the development of learning material is dependent upon the curriculum which is determined by the public authorities.
Poleg tega je podjetje NDLA v obeh fazah vključevalo podoben trojček organov odločanja.
This point is also reflected in the scope of the NDLA's activities in the Articles of Association which refer to the objective of providing digital learning material tailored to the needs of pupils and teachers.
FFU je v skladu z Zakonom o lokalni samoupravi postal nadzorni svet sodelovanja, nadzorni svet pa je imenoval petčlanski upravni odbor, tako kot v fazi ad hoc sodelovanja, ko je upravni odbor imenoval FFU.
This assessment is not altered by the fact that the activities were left to the market prior to the State's activities, since it cannot matter whether the activity might be (or indeed was) pursued by a private operator [81].
Tudi sestava upravne skupine/upravnega odbora je v obeh fazah vključevala enake člane, tj. vodjo FFU in vsaj enega predstavnika posamezne regije usposabljanja (tj. severna regija, jugozahodna regija in vzhodna regija) [87].
The Authority therefore concludes that the open nature of the website does not entail that the activities of NDLA are economic in nature.
Nazadnje, podjetje NDLA je v obeh fazah imelo ekipo, odgovorno za vsakodnevno upravljanje [88].
The legal status from ad hoc- to inter-municipal cooperation had no effect on the decision making process and cannot have an impact on the classification of the activities as non-economic
Kot so potrdili norveški organi, sprememba pravnega statusa iz faze ad hoc sodelovanja v fazo medobčinskega sodelovanja v skladu z oddelkom 27 Zakona o lokalni samoupravi ni vplivala na postopek sprejemanja odločitev, kar ponazarjajo in potrjujejo tudi zgoraj povzete informacije [89].
In its judgment annulling the Decision the EFTA Court addressed several aspects relating not to the nature of the activity as such but rather to the organisational aspects of the NDLA, its financing and its autonomy.
Osnovni vir financiranja podjetja NDLA se sčasoma ni spremenil (tj. državna sredstva), spremenil pa se je način stekanja sredstev v podjetje NDLA.
These aspects relate to the practical implementation of the requirement to provide free learning materials and are addressed below.
V začetni fazi je podjetje NDLA dejansko prejemalo sredstva neposredno od ministrstva za izobraževanje in raziskave, medtem ko se je pozneje financiralo iz proračunov sodelujočih okrajnih organov (v te proračune pa so sredstva pritekala iz splošne sheme nepovratnih sredstev).
The change of legal status from ad hoc cooperation to a formal inter-municipal cooperation according to the Local Government Act Section 27 had no effect on the decision making process (nor did the change in the funding have any implications on the organisation of the NDLA).
Dejstvo ostaja, da se je podjetje NDLA v preteklosti v celoti financiralo s sredstvi javnih organov in se tako financira tudi zdaj ter da brezplačno zagotavlja učno gradivo.
The complainant has not alleged that the scope of the NDLA's activities changed from its ad hoc cooperation phase to its formal establishment as an inter-municipal cooperation.
Ne šole ne učenci podjetju NDLA ne plačujejo nobenih prispevkov.
Nevertheless, the EFTA Court points out that the lack of information about how the county authorities organised their cooperation to comply with their obligations to provide learning material in the NDLA ad hoc cooperation phase may have an impact on the classification of the activities as non-economic.
Nadzorni organ ugotavlja tudi, da ni dokazov, da podjetje NDLA izvaja kakršno koli drugo obliko dejavnosti, ki bi se lahko štela za gospodarsko.
For that reason the Court emphasised that the Authority should have carried out an investigation on the effects of the change in legal status on the decision making process within the NDLA [82].
Dejanski stroški storitve, ki se opravlja, in provizija, ki jo plačujejo tisti, ki koristijo dejavnost, niso povezani.
The management structure of the NDLA entity did not change when it was converted into an inter-municipal cooperation under the Local Government Act [83].
Poleg tega se dejavnosti podjetja NDLA v celoti financirajo iz državnega proračuna in ne prek plačil [90].
Furthermore, the scope of the NDLA's powers and the decision making processes did not change.
Združevanje državnih sredstev v medobčinskem sodelovanju s strani okrajnih organov, da bi izpolnili svojo obveznost zagotovitve digitalnega učnega gradiva, je negospodarske narave
As such, the scope of the NDLA's decisional making powers did not change.
Nadzorni organ je sklenil, da so dejavnosti podjetja NDLA v zvezi z zagotavljanjem digitalnega učnega gradiva tesno povezane s širšo izobraževalno misijo okrajnih organov in da so negospodarske narave.
The Authority has compared the structure of the NDLA in its ad hoc cooperation phase [84] with the structure in the inter-municipal cooperation phase [85] and found that there are no material differences.
Nadzorni organ v nadaljevanju ocenjuje vprašanje, ki ga je izpostavilo Sodišče Efte.
The goal of the NDLA in both phases has been to develop and offer free digital learning material that covers all subjects in the upper secondary school [86].
Po mnenju Sodišča Efte iz Odločbe ni jasno razvidno, ali obveznost brezplačnega zagotavljanja digitalnega učnega gradiva velja za okrajne organe ali za podjetje NDLA [91].
Furthermore, in both phases, the NDLA consisted of a similar trio of decision making bodies.
Sodišče Efte ugotavlja, da se Nadzorni organ v Odločbi „sklicuje na norveško zakonodajo in navaja, da morajo okraji v skladu z zakonodajo učencem brezplačno zagotoviti potrebno tiskano in digitalno učno gradivo“ [92].
The FFU became the Supervisory Board of the cooperation under the Local Government Act and its Management Board, composed of five members, was appointed by the Supervisory Board as it had been in the ad hoc cooperation phase, when the management board was appointed by the FFU.
Poleg tega je ugotovilo, da Odločba v oceni avtonomije podjetja NDLA navaja, da podjetje NDLA ne more sprejeti odločitve v zvezi z zaračunavanjem provizij končnemu uporabniku, „[…] saj pravni okvir zavezuje podjetje NDLA k brezplačnemu zagotavljanju storitev“ [93].
Also the composition of the management group/board has consisted of the same members in both phases, i.e. the leader of the FFU, and at least one representative for each of the training regions (i.e. Northern Region, South Western Region and Eastern Region) [87].
Sodba se sklicuje tudi na izjavo Nadzornega organa na ustnem zaslišanju, da so okrajni organi zakonsko zavezani brezplačnemu izvajanju te storitve in da so sklenili, da bodo skupaj izvajali to storitev prek podjetja NDLA [94].
Finally, the NDLA has had a team responsible for the day-to-day management in both phases [88].
S tega vidika so po mnenju Sodišča Efte navedene izjave iz Odločbe popolnoma protislovne, ker ni jasno, kdo je stranka podjetja NDLA.
As confirmed by the Norwegian authorities, the change of legal status from the ad hoc cooperation phase to an inter-municipal cooperation phase according to the Local Government Act section 27 had no effect on the decision making process, which is also illustrated and confirmed by the information summarized above [89].
Pravni okvir poslovanja podjetja NDLA je sestavljen iz številnih različnih elementov.
The ultimate source of the NDLA funding has not changed over time (i.e. funds from the State); rather the manner in which the funds were channelled to the NDLA changed.
Prvič, za okrajne organe veljajo z zakonom določene obveznosti v okviru nacionalne zakonodaje (kot je Zakon o šolstvu).
Indeed, in the early stages of the NDLA, funds were received directly from the Ministry of Education and Research, whilst later on, the NDLA was funded from the participating county authorities' budgets (those budgets being funded by the general grant scheme).
Sprememba Zakona o šolstvu iz leta 2007 (glej uvodno izjavo 20) je na primer uvedla obveznost okrajnih organov, da šoloobveznim otrokom brezplačno zagotovijo digitalno gradivo.
The fact remains that the NDLA has been and is fully funded by public authorities and distributes the learning material free of charge.
Drugič, sprejeti so bili razni upravni akti za zagotovitev, da okrajni organi opravljajo to z zakonom določeno obveznost.
Neither the schools nor the pupils pay any contribution to the NDLA.
Vključevali so resolucije (na primer resolucije, ki so jih sprejeli okrajni organi) in druge upravne akte, kot je dodelitev sredstev ministrstva za izobraževanje in raziskave aprila 2007.
The Authority further notes, that there are no indications that the NDLA engages in any other form of activity, which could be considered as being economic in nature.
Nazadnje, na podlagi statuta podjetja NDLA in predhodnega mandata je z zakonom določena obveznost okrajnih organov postala pravna obveznost podjetja NDLA, ki ga zavezuje k brezplačnemu zagotavljanju digitalnega gradiva.
There is no connection between the actual costs of the service provided and the fee paid by those benefiting from the activity.
Ta okvir je bil opisan tudi v predložitvi norveških organov z dne 2. maja 2013, v kateri so potrdili (i) z zakonom določeno obveznost okrajnih organov (glej oddelek 1 predložitve), (ii) obveznost, ki je bila v fazi ad hoc sodelovanja naložena svetu direktorjev podjetja NDLA, da si morajo prizadevati za brezplačno zagotavljanje digitalnega učnega gradiva (glej prvo alineo točke o ciljih rezultatov mandata [95]), in (iii) da resolucije, ki so jih sprejeli okrajni organi ob ustanovitvi podjetja NDLA, navajajo, da je glavni cilj podjetja NDLA zagotavljanje brezplačnega digitalnega gradiva (glej str. 6 predložitve).
Further, the NDLA's activities are funded entirely by the public purse and not through remuneration [90].
Tako so se sodelujoči okrajni organi odločili, da bodo svojo z zakonom določeno obveznost zagotavljanja brezplačnega digitalnega gradiva učencem uresničili z vzpostavitvijo medobčinskega sodelovanja NDLA, ki posluje znotraj pravnega okvira (vključno z resolucijami okrajnih organov in statutom), ki je bil vzpostavljen, da bi lahko okrajni organi opravljali svojo zakonsko določeno obveznost.
The county authorities pooling of State resources in order to fulfil their obligation to provide digital learning materials into an inter-municipal cooperation is non-economic in nature
Na kratko se lahko podjetje NDLA opiše kot sodelovanje med sodelujočimi okrajnimi organi, ki je bilo vzpostavljeno, da bi lahko okrajni organi združili svoja sredstva.
The Authority has concluded that the activities of the NDLA relating to the provision of digital learning materials is closely linked to the broader teaching mission of the county authorities and that it is non-economic in nature.
Namesto da bi vsak okrajni organ posebej kupoval in razvijal digitalno gradivo, se je velika večina okrajnih organov odločila, da bodo za namene opravljanja z zakonom določene obveznosti združili svoja sredstva (to vrsto sodelovanja med okrajnimi organi je predvidelo že ministrstvo za izobraževanje in raziskave, ko je leta 2006 pozvalo okrajne organe, naj zaprosijo za financiranje) [96].
In the following, the Authority assesses an issue raised by the EFTA Court.
Okrajni organi prek tega sodelovanja torej „izvajajo svoja pooblastila, da bi izpolnili svoje obveznosti do prebivalcev“ [97].
The EFTA Court found that it was unclear from the Decision whether the obligation to provide digital learning material free of charge falls upon the county authorities or upon the NDLA [91].
Norveški organi so to potrdili v predložitvi z dne 31. marca 2014, v kateri so poudarili, da je sodelovanje med okrajnimi organi sestavni del prizadevanj okrajnih organov za zagotovitev brezplačne javne višje srednješolske izobrazbe na Norveškem.
The EFTA Court noted that in the Decision, the Authority ‘refers to the Norwegian legislation and states that it obliged the counties to provide the pupils with the necessary printed and digital learning materials free of charge’ [92].
Kar zadeva proračunska vprašanja, podjetje NDLA ni pristojno za sprejemanje odločitev.
The EFTA Court further noted that in the assessment on the autonomy of the NDLA, the Decision states that the NDLA cannot decide on charging fees to the end consumer ‘(…) since the legal framework obliges the NDLA to provide its services free of charge’ [93].
Čeprav upravni odbor podjetja priporoča raven financiranja za naslednji proračun, je to le priporočilo, ki ga sodelujoči okrajni organi upoštevajo pri oblikovanju proračuna podjetja NDLA.
The judgment also refers to the Authority's statement at the oral hearing that it is the county authorities which bear the statutory obligation to offer this service free of charge and that they had decided to offer this service jointly through the NDLA [94].
Kar zadeva naročanje in nakupovanje, podjetje NDLA upošteva strategijo javnih razpisov, ki je bila sprejeta za zagotovitev, da so javni razpisi podjetja NDLA v celoti v skladu z Zakonom o javnem naročanju [98].
In light of this, the EFTA Court considered the above mentioned statements in the Decision to represent an implicit contradiction as it was not clear who the NDLA's client was.
Kar zadeva bolj splošno nakupovanje, so pooblastila podjetja NDLA določena v statutu, ki obseg dejavnosti nakupovanja podjetja NDLA omejuje na cilje, določene za podjetje NDLA, tj, nakupovanje in razvoj digitalnega učnega gradiva [99].
The legal framework in which the NDLA operates consists of a number of different elements.
Jasno je, da mora biti podjetje NDLA zmožno učinkovito izvajati svoje naloge, in bilo bi nesmiselno, če bi se sodelujoči okrajni organi ali nadzorni svet vpletali v vsak nakup digitalnega učnega gradiva.
First, there are statutory obligations under national law (such as the Education Act), which are imposed upon the county authorities.
Zato statut zagotavlja določeno raven avtonomije za vsakodnevne dejavnosti podjetja NDLA, zlasti v zvezi z nakupovanjem, vendar to avtonomijo omejujejo določene naloge podjetja NDLA in njegov proračun (tj. dejavnosti ne presegajo tistega, kar je v osnovi nujno za izpolnjevanje z zakonom določenih zahtev, ki jih je država naložila okrajnim organom) [100].
The 2007 amendment to the Education Act, for instance, (see paragraph 20 above) imposed an obligation on the county authorities to provide school children with digital material free of charge.
Navesti je še treba, da sodna praksa Sodišča jasno izraža, da ni potrebe po zanikanju povezanosti dejavnosti nakupovanja „s poznejšo uporabo, kateri se te dejavnosti namenijo, da bi se določila narava zadevne dejavnosti nakupovanja“ [101].
Second, there were various administrative acts which were adopted in order for the county authorities to discharge this statutory obligation.
Če se torej dejavnosti podjetja NDLA z vidika zagotavljanja brezplačnega digitalnega učnega gradiva obravnavajo kot negospodarske, se tudi vse povezane dejavnosti nakupovanja obravnavajo kot negospodarske.
These included resolutions (such as the resolutions passed by the county authorities), as well as other administrative acts such as the April 2007 award of funding by the Ministry of Education and Research.
Ker statut jasno določa, da lahko podjetje NDLA kupuje le blago ali storitve, ki so nujni za doseganje njegovega cilja (tj. zagotavljanje brezplačnega digitalnega učnega gradiva), bodo te dejavnosti nakupovanja nujno povezane z negospodarsko dejavnostjo.
Finally, the Articles of Association of the NDLA, and the mandate before that, implemented the county authorities' statutory obligation into a legal obligation on NDLA to provide digital materials free of charge.
Na podlagi dejstev iz oddelka I.4.6 je razvidno, da podjetje NDLA nima niti zaposlenih niti lastnih prostorov ali infrastrukture.
This framework was also described in the Norwegian authorities' submission of 2 May 2013 in which they confirmed (i) the county authorities' statutory obligation (see Section 1 of the submission), (ii) the obligation imposed on the NDLA's board of directors, in the ad hoc cooperation phase, to work towards offering free digital learning materials (see first bullet point under result goals of the Mandate [95]), and (iii) that the resolutions adopted by the county authorities establishing the NDLA stated that the ultimate goal of the NDLA was to offer free digital material (see p. 6 of the submission).
Večina njegove delovne sile so uslužbenci okrajnih organov, ki so za določeno obdobje napoteni (za polovični ali polni delovni čas) v podjetje NDLA.
As such, the participating county authorities have chosen to address their statutory obligation to provide free digital material to the pupils by setting up the NDLA inter-municipal cooperation, which in turn operates within a legal framework (including the county authority resolutions and the Articles of Association) that has been established to enable the county authorities to discharge their statutory obligation.
Podjetje NDLA potem zgolj povrne stroške zadevnemu okrajnemu organu za čas, ki ga je njegov uslužbenec namenil projektom podjetja NDLA.
In summary, the NDLA can be described as a cooperation between the participating county authorities that has been created to enable the county authorities to pool their resources.
Preostali del delovne sile vključuje zunanje svetovalce, ki so bili izbrani v okviru postopkov oddaje javnega naročila, ki jih podjetje NDLA financira iz svojega proračuna.
So rather than purchasing and developing digital materials on a county authority-by-county authority basis, the vast majority of the county authorities have decided to combine their resources in order to address their statutory obligation (this type of cooperation between the county authorities was envisaged by the Ministry of Education and Research itself when it invited the county authorities to apply for funding in 2006) [96].
Tako podjetje NDLA na eni strani nima nobenega nadzora nad stroški obsega svojega osebja, na drugi strani pa ima omejena pooblastila za sprejemanje odločitev o storitvah, v zvezi s katerimi objavi razpis, saj ga zavezuje njegova strategija javnih razpisov, njegove odločitve pa prek nadzornega sveta nadzirajo okrajni organi.
The county authorities are therefore, though this cooperation, ‘exercising their powers in order to fulfil their duties towards their population’ [97].
Zato ima podjetje NDLA pri vprašanjih infrastrukture in osebja zelo malo avtonomije.
This has been confirmed by the Norwegian authorities in their submission of 31 March 2014 where it is reiterated that the collaboration between the county authorities is an integral part of the county authorities' efforts to provide free public upper secondary education in Norway.
V primerih, v katerih zadevne dejavnosti ne izvaja država, ampak drugi subjekti, je treba med drugim odgovoriti na vprašanje, ali je prejemnik sredstev (javnih ali zasebnih) pod nadzorom države in zlasti ali prejemnik zgolj izvaja zakonodajo in ne more vplivati na zakonsko določene pogoje storitve (tj. znesek prispevkov, uporaba premoženja in določitev ravni ugodnosti) [102].
As regards budget issues, the NDLA has no decisional power.
Če pa država prejemniku zagotavlja pravico do lastne presoje v zvezi s trgovinskimi parametri dejavnosti (npr. cenami, stroški, premoženjem in zaposlenimi), je bolj verjetno, da prejemnik predstavlja podjetje.
Although its Management Board recommends a level of funding for the following budget, it is only a recommendation which the participating county authorities take into account when determining the NDLA's budget.
Pritožnik je navedel, da bi bilo treba podjetje NDLA obravnavati kot podjetje, ločeno od države ali okrajnih organov, od katerih je prejemalo zadevna sredstva.
In terms of procurement and purchasing, the NDLA follows a public tender strategy which was adopted in order to ensure that the NDLA's public tenders are in full compliance with the Public Procurement Act [98].
Vendar je na podlagi informacij, predloženih Nadzornemu organu, jasno, da je podjetje NDLA del javne uprave in v vsakem primeru pod strogim nadzorom države.
For purchasing more generally, the NDLA's powers are set out in the Articles of Association, which limit the scope of the NDLA's purchasing activities to the objectives that have been set for the NDLA, namely the purchasing and development of digital learning material [99].
V skladu z obstoječo sodno prakso je subjekt pod nadzorom javnih organov (in tako odvisen od države), če je njegova naloga zakonsko določena ter če javni organi določijo stroške in prihodke njegovih dejavnosti [103].
Clearly, the NDLA needs to be able to carry out its tasks in an effective manner and it would make little sense for the participating county authorities or the Supervisory Board to get involved with every single purchase of digital learning material for instance.
Nadzorni organ v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da so sodelujoči okrajni organi – ob upoštevanju zahteve iz revidiranega državnega proračuna za leto 2006 – vzpostavili NDLA kot medobčinsko sodelovanje, pri čemer so mu nalogo dodelili tako, da je vsak sodelujoči okrajni organ sprejel enako resolucijo.
Hence, the Articles of Association provide for some autonomy for the NDLA's day-to-day activities, specifically in terms of purchasing, but this autonomy is limited by the NDLA's stated tasks and its budget (i.e. it goes no further than what is necessary ultimately to fulfil the statutory requirements imposed by the State on the county authorities) [100].
Poleg tega okrajni organi nadzirajo stroškovne parametre dejavnosti, saj so ti stroški omejeni na prispevke, ki jih okrajni organi enostransko določijo v običajnih proračunskih postopkih.