natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking is still developing a central and uniform system to integrate all the operational data and to allow regular monitoring and controlling of estimates, costs and deviations; underlines the importance of having such a system in place; notes, moreover, that the Joint Undertaking has not updated the valuation of the contribution by the Joint Undertaking to the ITER Project beyond the finalisation of the construction phase; acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking has a fully operational system to control and monitor costs at the level of the procurement arrangement and at the level of the system, although it did not yet have in place at the time of the audit all the data at level 6 (contracts); acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking estimated costs concerning projects in the individual project teams rather than in a centralised and uniform manner; notes that the Joint Undertaking employs a number of data management tools to maintain and manage its operational and financial data integrated by a core integrated reporting system and that work is progressing to improve its system to manage cost data and deviations;
priznava, da skupno podjetje še vedno razvija osrednji in enotni sistem, s katerim bi vključilo vse operativne podatke in omogočilo redno spremljanje in nadzorovanje ocen, stroškov in odstopanj; poudarja, da je tak sistem pomemben; poleg tega ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje še ni posodobilo vrednotenja prispevka skupnega podjetja k projektu ITER po zaključku gradbene faze; priznava, da ima skupno podjetje popolnoma delujoč sistem za nadziranje in spremljanje stroškov na ravni ureditve javnih naročil in na ravni sistema, čeprav v času revizije še ni imelo vseh podatkov na ravni 6 (pogodbe); priznava, da je skupno podjetje ocenjevalo stroške projektov v posameznih projektnih skupinah, ne pa na centraliziran in enoten način; ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje uporablja več orodij za upravljanje podatkov za vzdrževanje in upravljanje svojih operativnih in finančnih podatkov, ki so združeni z osnovnim integriranim sistemom za poročanje, ter da dela za izboljšanje sistema za upravljanje podatkov o stroških in odstopanjih napredujejo;
Ascertains that, due to the challenges currently faced by the ITER Project, the new Director-General of the ITER Organisation presented to the ITER Council an action plan including specific measures to address the main constraints that are currently affecting the development of the project; notes, furthermore, that, as regards the Joint Undertaking, its new acting director prepared an action plan for the Joint Undertaking which largely supports the ITER Organisation action plan; acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking’s acting director presented the action plan to the Joint Undertaking’s Governing Board in March 2015, when it was fully endorsed, and that the Joint Undertaking’s action plan complements the ITER Organisation action plan in a number of respects and identifies further improvements in the Joint Undertaking’s own operations; observes that at the time of the audit, the practical measures for the implementation of both action plans were still being established; notes, moreover, that since March 2015, those action plans have been implemented and closely followed by the ITER Organisation and the Joint Undertaking and that they are expected to bring improvements;
ugotavlja, da je novi generalni direktor organizacije ITER svetu te organizacije v odziv na izzive, s katerimi se sedaj srečuje projekt ITER, predstavil akcijski načrt, ki vključuje posebne ukrepe za reševanje glavnih ovir, ki sedaj vplivajo na razvoj projekta; nadalje ugotavlja, da je novi vršilec dolžnosti direktorja skupnega podjetja pripravil akcijski načrt za skupno podjetje, ki večinoma podpira akcijski načrt organizacije ITER; je seznanjen, da je vršilec dolžnosti direktorja skupnega podjetja predstavil akcijski načrt upravnemu odboru skupnega podjetja marca 2015, ko je dobil celovito podporo, ter da akcijski načrt skupnega podjetja v več vidikih dopolnjuje akcijski načrt organizacije ITER in prepoznava nadaljnje izboljšave delovanja skupnega podjetja; opaža, da so bili v času revizije praktični ukrepi za izvajanje obeh akcijskih načrtov še v pripravi; poleg tega ugotavlja, da se ta akcijska načrta izvajata od marca 2015 ter da ju organizacija ITER in skupno podjetje pozorno spremljata in da se od načrtov pričakuje, da bosta privedla do izboljšav;
Notes that the ITER Council also approved a working schedule for the ITER Organisation for the years 2016 and 2017, together with a set of milestones to be reached in those years; requests the Joint Undertaking to present those milestones in a greater detail to the discharge authority;
je seznanjen, da je svet ITER potrdil delovni načrt za organizacijo ITER za leti 2016 in 2017, skupaj z vrsto vmesnih ciljev, ki naj bi bili doseženi v teh letih; prosi skupno podjetje, naj te vmesne cilje organu za podelitev razrešnice podrobneje predstavi;
Takes note of the fact that the final 2014 budget available for implementation included commitment appropriations of EUR 1168800000 and payment appropriations of EUR 576600000; the utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 100 % and 88,5 % respectively; notes, however, that the implementation rate for payment appropriations with respect to the 2014 initial budget was 73 %;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je končni proračun za leto 2014, ki je bil na voljo za izvrševanje, vključeval odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v višini 1168800000 EUR in odobritve za plačila v višini 576600000 EUR; stopnja porabe je za odobritve za prevzem obveznosti znašala 100 %, za odobritve za plačila pa 88,5 %; vendar opaža, da je stopnja izvrševanja odobritev plačil glede na prvotni proračun za leto 2014 znašala 73 %;
Observes that regarding commitment appropriations, 23 % were implemented through direct individual commitments while the remaining 77 % were implemented through global commitments; observes that the low rate of implementation by individual commitment is explained by the overall slippage of the ITER Project and the multiple requests for change made by the ITER Organisation;
opaža, da je bilo 23 % odobritev za prevzem obveznosti izvršenih z neposrednimi posameznimi prevzetimi obveznostmi, preostalih 77 % pa s skupnimi prevzetimi obveznostmi; ugotavlja, da je nizko stopnjo izvrševanja posameznih obveznosti mogoče pojasniti s splošno zamudo projekta ITER in večkratnimi zahtevami organizacije ITER po spremembah;
Takes note of the fact that significant progress has been made and the majority of the CVs of the Governing Board and its subsidiary bodies members have been published on the Joint Undertaking's website; notes, moreover, that, in accordance with the rules of procedure of the Governing Board, those members who fail to publish their CVs are not able to access the Joint Undertaking's document management system containing the Governing Board documentation [5];
je seznanjen dejstvom, da je bil dosežen znaten napredek in da je bila na spletnem mestu skupnega podjetja objavljena večina življenjepisov članov upravnega odbora in njegovih pomožnih organov; poleg tega opaža, da v skladu s poslovnikom upravnega odbora tisti njegovi člani, ki ne objavijo svojih življenjepisov, nimajo dostopa do sistema skupnega podjetja za upravljanja dokumentacije, ki vsebuje dokumentacijo upravnega odbora [5];
Host Agreement
Sporazum o sedežu
Acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking welcomed the offer made by the Kingdom of Spain, which proposed new premises shared with a Spanish institution; observes, however, that an agreement was not reached because, after an analysis carried out by an independent external architect, the space available was found to be unsuitable [6]; urges the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority about the outcome of recent negotiations regarding a new contract in the existing host building;
ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje pozdravilo ponudbo Kraljevine Španije, ki je ponudila nove prostore v souporabi s špansko ustanovo; vseeno opaža, da dogovor ni bil dosežen, ker je bilo na podlagi analize, ki jo je opravil neodvisni zunanji arhitekt, ugotovljeno, da prostori niso primerni [6]; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o izidu nedavnih pogajanj o novi pogodbi za stavbo, ki skupno podjetje gosti že zdaj;
Is deeply concerned that the Joint Undertaking has not yet adopted all rules implementing the Staff Regulations; notes with concern that the Joint Undertaking relied on two transitional measures in order to avoid a legal vacuum pending the formal adoption of outstanding implementing rules to the Staff Regulations; notes however that progress has been made in this regard; urges the Joint Undertaking to remediate to the situation urgently; calls on the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority on further advancements and state of implementation [7];
je močno zaskrbljen, ker skupno podjetje še ni sprejelo vseh pravil za izvajanje kadrovskih predpisov; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da se je skupno podjetje opiralo na prehodna ukrepa, da bi se izognilo pravni praznini pred uradnim sprejetjem izvedbenih pravil h kadrovskim predpisom; kljub temu ugotavlja, da je bil glede tega dosežen napredek; poziva skupno podjetje, naj ta problem nemudoma uredi; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvešča o nadaljnjem napredku in stanju v zvezi z izvajanjem [7];
Notes that in 2014 the Joint Undertaking Internal Audit Capability (‘IAC’) performed a review of the monitoring of contract implementation and outlined the existence of important risk factors such as the immature design of some of the ITER activities, the large number of project change requests, the unrealistic project schedule and the delay in the implementation of activities; observes that it is difficult for the Joint Undertaking to mitigate some of those risks effectively, as they are attributable to the ITER Organisation; notes, furthermore, that the review also identified that stronger controls and changes to processes are needed, in particular in management and change control, financial management of contracts and the management of non-conformities;
ugotavlja, da je leta 2014 skupina za notranjo revizijo Skupnega podjetja izvedla pregled spremljanja izvajanja pogodb in poudarila pomembne dejavnike tveganja, kot so nedodelana zasnova nekaterih dejavnosti ITER, veliko število zahtevkov za spremembo projekta, nerealističen časovni načrt projekta in zamuda pri izvajanju dejavnosti; ugotavlja, da bo skupno podjetje težko učinkovito zmanjšalo nekatera od teh tveganj, saj je zanje odgovorna organizacija ITER; poleg tega je seznanjen, da je bila pregledu ugotovljena tudi potreba po boljših kontrolah in spremembah procesov, zlasti pri kontroli upravljanja in sprememb, pri finančnem poslovodenju pogodb in pri upravljanju neskladnosti;
Notes with concern from the Court’s report that the Joint Undertaking’s internal corporate risk management system identified ten new risks in 2014; notes that out of the 32 actions identified to address the six very high risks, 13 were implemented, nine were in progress, one was cancelled as obsolete, and nine had not been commenced at the time of the audit;
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je notranji sistem za obvladovanje poslovnega tveganja v letu 2014 odkril deset novih tveganj; ugotavlja, da je bilo od 32 ukrepov, ki so določeni za obravnavo šestih zelo visokih tveganj, izvedenih 13 ukrepov, 9 jih je bilo v teku, eden je bil preklican zaradi zastarelosti, pri devetih pa se izvajanje v času revizije še ni začelo;
Ascertains that the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (‘IAS’) carried out a limited review of the contract management and pointed out that the Joint Undertaking is changing from an organisation which is mainly procurement-oriented to an organisation which mainly manages contracts; observes that the review concluded that the Joint Undertaking is progressing in establishing entity-wide controls to address the risks related to the implementation of the contracts; observes, however, that it also identified a certain number of areas where the controls in place are not mature enough yet, in particular as regards the management of contract amendments and contingencies;
ugotavlja, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo izvedla omejen pregled upravljanja pogodb in poudarila, da se skupno podjetje iz organizacije, ki je pretežno usmerjena v javna naročila, spreminja v organizacijo, ki pretežno upravlja pogodbe; opaža, da je pregled ugotovil, da skupno podjetje napreduje pri vzpostavljanju kontrol na ravni celotne organizacije, s katerimi obravnava tveganja, povezana z izvajanjem pogodb; vendar opaža, da je bilo pri pregledu ugotovljenih tudi več področij, na katerih obstoječe kontrole še niso dovolj dodelane, zlasti v zvezi z upravljanjem sprememb in nepredvidenih stroškov v pogodbah;
Acknowledges from the Court’s report that negotiated procedures constituted 58 % of the 67 operational tendering procedures launched in 2014, and that there is room for improvement of the procurement procedures;
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da so postopki s pogajanji predstavljali 58 % od 67 operativnih postopkov oddaje javnih naročil, začetih leta 2014, in da je mogoče postopke javnih naročil izboljšati;
Expresses concerns about the fact that the Court’s report found that, with one exception, the Joint Undertaking failed to provide the amount allocated to the different contracts from the EUR 6600000000 capped budget at the time of launching the procedure and did not provide the value for the estimate at completion (‘EAC’) of those activities; reminds the Joint Undertaking that such information is essential to calculate the cost deviations from the capped budget; notes, furthermore, that in one case, the deviation of the awarded value of the contract over the cost baseline was 29 % and that that deviation was not reported in the evaluation committee report; urges the Joint Undertaking to be transparent and to strictly respect the sound financial management principles;
je zaskrbljen zaradi dejstva, ugotovljenega v poročilu Računskega sodišča, da razen v enem primeru skupno podjetje ob začetku postopkov ni navedlo vsot, ki so bile dodeljene posameznim pogodbam iz omejenega proračuna v višini 6600000000 EUR, in da ni navedlo niti zneska za ocenjeno vrednost ob zaključku teh dejavnosti; opozarja skupno podjetje, da so te informacije nujne za izračun odstopanj stroškov iz omejenega proračuna; poleg tega ugotavlja, da je v enem primeru odstopanje dodeljene vrednosti pogodbe od stroškov po osnovnem scenariju znašalo 29 % in da to odstopanje ni bilo navedeno v poročilu odbora za vrednotenje; poziva skupno podjetje, naj ravna pregledno in dosledno spoštuje načela dobrega finančnega poslovodenja;
Notes with concern that the Court’s report refers to deficiencies having been found in the assessment of the financial offers by the evaluation committee; observes that, in one case, neither the contract options, amounting to EUR 32000000, nor the additional costs to be incurred were taken into consideration in the assessment; notes that, in another case, the offers were not compared against the allocated value from the capped budget or against the cost baseline; points out that the evaluation committee reports did not state the EAC for those contracts in any of the procedures reviewed;
je zaskrbljen zaradi navedb iz poročila Računskega sodišča, da so bile v oceni finančnih ponudb, ki jo je pripravil odbor za vrednotenje, odkrite pomanjkljivosti; opaža, da v enem primeru v oceni niso bile upoštevane niti pogodbene možnosti, ki so znašale 32000000 EUR, niti dodatni stroški, ki bi nastali; opaža, da v drugem primeru ni bilo primerjave ponudb z dodeljeno vrednostjo iz omejenega proračuna ali s stroški po osnovnem scenariju; poudarja, da odbor za vrednotenje pri nobenem od pregledanih postopkov v svojem poročilu ni navedel ocenjene vrednosti ob zaključku za te pogodbe;
Notes that the performance of certain procurement procedures was affected by delays, and that in one procurement procedure, the Joint Undertaking had to include an unforeseen and unbudgeted activity in the 2014 work programme resulting in an additional contract of EUR 2880000; observes, that in one procurement procedure, the assessment of the technical award criteria provided by the evaluation committee in the evaluation committee report was too generic and the comments recorded were not sufficiently detailed to support the scores awarded; notes, furthermore, that in three procurement procedures, although it published the corresponding contract notices and carried out a number of pre-procurement activities, the Joint Undertaking did not advertise the contracts by means of a pre-information notice in order to increase visibility and competition, as advised by the Commission Vademecum on public procurement;
ugotavlja, da so na uspešnost nekaterih postopkov javnih naročil vplivale zamude in da je moralo skupno podjetje v enem postopku javnih naročil v delovni program za leto 2014 vključiti nepredvideno dejavnost, ki ni bila vključena v proračun, zaradi česar je bilo treba skleniti dodatno pogodbo v višini 2880000 EUR; opaža, da je bila pri enem postopku javnih naročil ocena tehničnih meril za dodelitev, ki jo je zagotovil odbor za vrednotenje v svojem ocenjevalnem poročilu, preveč splošna, zabeležena pojasnila pa niso bila dovolj natančna, da bi opravičila dodeljene točke; nadalje ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje pri treh postopkih oddaje javnega naročila sicer objavilo ustrezna obvestila o pogodbah in izvedlo več dejavnosti pred javnimi naročili, vendar ni objavilo predhodnega informativnega obvestila o pogodbah, da bi izboljšalo prepoznavnost in konkurenco, kot priporoča priročnik Komisije o javnih naročilih;
Acknowledges that the action plans adopted by the Joint Undertaking, in response to the internal audits on the financial circuits, grant management and expert contracts, were fully or mostly implemented by March 2015; notes, furthermore, that, out of 46 recommendations still in progress, the deadline for implementation of 29 recommendations was overdue concerning the actions plans adopted by the Joint Undertaking in response to the internal audits carried out;
priznava, da so bili do marca 2015 v celoti ali večinoma izvedeni akcijski načrti, ki jih je skupno podjetje sprejelo v odziv na notranje revizije finančnih krogov, upravljanja nepovratnih sredstev in pogodb s strokovnjaki; poleg tega je seznanjen, da so bili prekoračeni roki za izvajanje pri 29 od 46 priporočil, ki se še izvajajo, ti pa zadevajo akcijske načrte, ki jih je skupno podjetje sprejelo v odziv na opravljene notranje revizije;
Observes that ex post audits on grants were not concluded at the time of the Court's audit;
ugotavlja, da naknadne revizije nepovratnih sredstev niso bile zaključene v času revizije Računskega sodišča;
Notes from the Court's report that the Joint Undertaking has not yet amended its financial rules in order to reflect the changes brought by the new Financial Regulation [8] and the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of the new Financial Regulation [9]; acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking has taken measures and started a dialogue with the Commission in order to resolve that issue [10]; asks the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority of the progress made in this regard;
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje še ni spremenilo svojih finančnih predpisov, kar bi bilo potrebno zaradi sprememb, uvedenih z novo finančno uredbo [8] in okvirno finančno uredbo za organe iz člena 208 nove finančne uredbe [9]; potrjuje, da je skupno podjetje sprejelo ukrepe in začelo dialog s Komisijo za rešitev tega vprašanja [10]; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvešča o napredku v zvezi s tem;
Acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking considers the measures in place to be efficient to mitigate risks and to increase competition; notes that, regarding industrial policy, the Joint Undertaking implemented 24 out of the 32 actions foreseen by the end of the financial year 2014 [11];
potrjuje, da skupno podjetje meni, da so sprejeti ukrepi učinkoviti za zmanjševanje tveganj in krepitev konkurence; ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje – kar zadeva industrijsko politiko – izvedlo 24 od 32 ukrepov, ki so bili predvideni do konca proračunskega leta 2014 [11];
Ascertains that the Joint Undertaking has taken measures regarding exclusive exploitation rights over intellectual property produced in fields outside fusion; notes, furthermore, that it was intended for the Joint Undertaking to develop definitions and methodologies to identify fusion applications; recalls the high importance of this matter; asks the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority on the advancements achieved in this regard [12].
ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje sprejelo ukrepe glede izključnih pravic za izkoriščanje intelektualne lastnine, ki jo ustvari na nefuzijskih področjih; nadalje ugotavlja, da je bil namen skupnega podjetja razvijati opredelitve in metodologije za odkrivanje aplikacij fuzije; opozarja na velik pomen tega vprašanja; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvešča o napredku v zvezi s tem [12].
Council conclusions on ITER status of 7 July 2010 (ref.
Sklepi Sveta o stanju projekta ITER z dne 7. julija 2010 (sklic 11902/10).
11902/10).
Poročilo o nadaljnjih ukrepih v zvezi z razrešnico za leto 2013.
Follow-up report 2013 Discharge.
Prav tam.
Ibid.
Letno poročilo o dejavnostih ITER, str.
ITER AAR - p.
104, in Poročilo o nadaljnjih ukrepih v zvezi z razrešnico za leto 2013.
104 & Follow-up report 2013 Discharge.
UL L 298, 26.10.2012, str.
Resolution (EU) 2016/1606 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU) 2016/1606
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2014: performance, financial management and control
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna agencij Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2014: uspešnost, finančno poslovodenje in nadzor
having regard to its decisions on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2014,
ob upoštevanju sklepov o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna agencij Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2014,
having regard to the Commission’s report on the follow-up to the discharge for the 2013 financial year (COM(2015) 505), and to the accompanying Commission staff working documents (SWD(2015) 194, SWD(2015) 195),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o nadaljnjem ukrepanju v zvezi z razrešnico za proračunsko leto 2013 (COM(2015) 505) in delovnih dokumentov služb Komisije, priloženih poročilu (SWD(2015) 194, SWD(2015) 195),