natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Calls on the Commission to pay particular attention in its verifications to the exhaustiveness of Member States' GNI and the use of comparable estimation procedures to cover the underground economy in national accounts; calls on Eurostat to check whether the Commission's guidelines are followed by all Member States and to take appropriate actions to ensure a comparable treatment of this issue between Member States;
meni, da bi morali Komisija in ESZD okrepiti svojo komunikacijsko politiko z vidika podpore, ki se zagotavlja na svetovni ravni, in z vidika posameznih držav prejemnic in ciljev ter da bi morala ta odslikavati vrednote Unije;
Calls on the Commission to document its work including a complete set of information relating to Eurostat's verification carried out on the basis of desk checks and/or of visits in the national statistical institutes (NSIs); considers that Eurostat's control files should allow management to clearly identify the results of the checks carried out on the selected GNI components, in compliance with the internal control standards (ICS);
priznava, da korupcija ostaja pomembna ovira za učinkovito podnebno financiranje, in poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi svoja prizadevanja, ko z razvojnimi partnerji obravnava protikorupcijska vprašanja;
Calls on Eurostat to assess, where possible, the potential impact (for quantifiable observations) and/or the amount at risk (for non-quantifiable observations) of the action points, and set clear materiality criteria in order to set specific reservations; considers that these criteria should be either qualitative or quantitative; is of the opinion that as a general rule, reservations should be placed on specific GNI components relating to action points not addressed by the NSIs within the deadlines set and whose impact may be material;
poziva Komisijo, naj Svetu predlaga časovni načrt za krepitev podnebnega financiranja za dosego ciljev za leto 2020 iz sporazuma iz Københavna, vključno z opredelitvijo zasebnega financiranja;
Calls on Eurostat to improve coordination between its department in charge of the verification of GNI for own resource purposes and its other departments, in particular those dealing with national accounts; considers that, where possible, actions undertaken by other Eurostat's departments may have an impact on the compilation of the gross domestic product (GDP) and/or GNI, the GNI Committee should be consulted and the final decision on these measures should be taken at an appropriate hierarchical level in Eurostat;
poziva Komisijo, naj neodvisno oceni globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah, v okviru katerega se preveri tudi, zakaj se večina držav članic ni odločila za njegovo sofinanciranje;
Calls on Eurostat to improve its assessment reports to provide a complete, transparent and consistent evaluation of the Member States' GNI data; considers that the annual opinions of the GNI Committee should include a clear assessment on whether Member States' GNI data are appropriate (or not) for own resource purposes, whether their contents comply with the requirements of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1287/2003 [8] (GNI Regulation) and whether they are used appropriately in the budgetary procedure as provided for in Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 [9] (the own resources' Regulation);
prosi Komisijo in ESZD, naj poročata o tem, koliko se na področju razvojne pomoči dosega cilj, da se bo v obdobju 2014–2020 20 % proračuna Unije in ERS porabilo za podnebne ukrepe, pri čemer naj navedeta, za koliko sredstev so bile prevzete obveznosti in koliko sredstev je bilo izplačanih;
Is of the opinion that the Annual Activity Reports (AARs) of DG Budget and Eurostat should provide a true and fair view of the verification of Member States' GNI data and of the management of GNI-based own resources; calls, therefore, on the Commission to establish requirements for Eurostat to report regularly on the results of its verification of GNI data, allowing DG Budget to draw the required assurance to be used in the context of its AARs;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v okviru Uredbe (EU) št. 525/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11] o mehanizmu za spremljanje dosežejo dogovor o skupnih standardih za spremljanje, poročanje in preverjanje, zlasti glede opredelitve „novih in dodatnih“, uporabe kazalnikov iz Ria ter poročanja o izplačilih podnebnega financiranja;
Part II
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj okrepijo svoje sodelovanje pri izvajanju kodeksa ravnanja EU o delitvi dela na področju podnebnega financiranja, zlasti v zvezi z izmenjavo informacij o dodelitvah sredstev za posamezne države, skupnim načrtovanjem ter preprečevanjem korupcije na področju podnebnega financiranja in bojem proti njej;
Special Report No 13/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU Development Assistance to Central Asia’
Del VI
Welcomes the special report assessing the EU development assistance to Central Asia; takes note of the findings, conclusions and recommendations and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 18/2013 z naslovom „Zanesljivost rezultatov pregledov, ki jih države članice izvajajo za kmetijske odhodke“
General remarks
priznava, da so bili sistemi, preučeni v posebnem poročilu št. 18/2013, spremenjeni z novimi uredbami skupne kmetijske politike (SKP), s čimer so se povečale odgovornosti certifikacijskih organov v državah članicah na področju preverjanja zakonitosti in pravilnosti izdatkov ter kar zadeva preverjanje rezultatov kontrole, ki se sporočijo Komisiji;
Welcomes the observations of the report that the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) have undertaken significant efforts in a rather challenging geographical and political context;
pozdravlja stalna prizadevanja Komisije za poenostavitev SKP; pričakuje, da bo poenostavitev meril za upravičenost privedla do poenostavitve pravil o nadzoru ter lahko prispevala k nižji stopnji napak;
Points out, however, that there is still room for improvement for the better targeting and tailoring of the Union development strategies through adequate assistance patterns to enhance the visibility and impact of the Union political objectives at regional level;
opominja Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se težave ne bodo ponavljale; spominja, da je Računsko sodišče v letnem poročilu za leto 2012 navedlo:
Emphasises the fact that the level and nature of the Union's engagement must be differentiated and conditional, depending on measurable progress in the fields of democratisation, human rights, good governance, sustainable socioeconomic development, the rule of law and the fight against corruption, offering its assistance where needed to help foster this progress, following lines similar to the principles of the Union's neighbourhood policy;
da so bili sistemi nadzora in kontrole plačil stroškov in plačil za razvoj podeželja držav članic deloma učinkoviti ter da so imeli nacionalni organi za veliko število transakcij, pri katerih je prišlo do napak, dovolj informacij, da so odkrili in odpravili te napake;
Considers that the continued promotion by the Union of programmes targeted at the Central Asian countries is an important trans-border tool for fostering understanding and cooperation among the countries of the region;
da obstajajo negativni vplivi na uspešnost integriranega upravnega in kontrolnega sistema (IAKS), zlasti vplivi netočnih podatkovnih zbirk, ki se uporabljajo za navzkrižna preverjanja;
Points out that development cooperation with the Central Asian countries can yield results only if these countries comply with international standards of democracy, governance, the rule of law and human rights; emphasises likewise that Union development cooperation must not be subordinated to economic, energy or security interests;
poudarja, da je Parlament 3. aprila 2014 podprl pridržek generalnega direktorja GD AGRI iz letnega poročila o dejavnostih za leto 2012 glede pomanjkljivosti, ki sta jih Komisija in Računsko sodišče našla v zvezi z upravičenostjo zemljišč; opozarja, da je zlasti zaprosil za ustrezno evidentiranje trajnih pašnikov v identifikacijskem sistemu za zemljišča (LPIS) in da bi ga morala Komisija vsakih šest mesecev obveščati o doseženem napredku;
Future developments with regard to the planning and implementing of the coming development assistance
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj nemudoma sprejmejo popravljalne ukrepe, če se izkaže, da so upravljavski in kontrolni sistemi in/ali podatkovne zbirke IAKS nezadostni ali zastareli;
Considers that the Commission should design any future regional programmes so that they are likely to achieve a genuine regional dimension;
odločno poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo plačila temeljila na rezultatih inšpekcijskih pregledov in da bodo pregledi dovolj kakovostni, da bo mogoče zanesljivo in dosledno ugotoviti, kolikšna je upravičena površina;
Asks the Commission to concentrate all assistance provided on a small number of sectors;
odločno poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo zasnova in kakovost dela plačilnih agencij in certifikacijskih organov zanesljiva osnova za oceno zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij; meni, da bi Komisija morala to doseči z oblikovanjem enotne revizijske strategije za nadzorni sistem skupne kmetijske politike;
Points out that the coming development assistance should be enhanced, on the one hand, through intensified internal Union coordination and, on the other hand, through intensified engagement with other international donors and regional stakeholders;
pozdravlja spremembo pristopa GD AGRI za izračun stopnje preostale napake pri nevezani pomoči za površino za leto 2012, saj pri tem upošteva, da lahko na statistične podatke inšpekcijskih pregledov, izjave direktorjev plačilnih agencij in delo, ki ga opravijo certifikacijski organi, učinkujejo pomanjkljivosti, ki vplivajo na njihovo zanesljivost; poziva, naj se ta novi pristop razširi na vse izdatke SKP v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih GD AGRI v novem obdobju financiranja;
Strongly supports the opening of fully fledged Union delegations in all the countries of Central Asia as a means of increasing the presence and visibility of the Union in the region and long-term cooperation and engagement with all sectors of society and of fostering progress towards better understanding and the emergence of the rule of law and respect for human rights; considers that the presence of such delegations will greatly contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the development assistance;
opominja Komisijo, da je podprl pridržek iz letnega poročila o dejavnostih GD AGRI v zvezi s celotnimi odhodki ELER v letu 2012 in da je ta pridržek posledica pomislekov glede kakovosti kontrol v nekaterih državah članicah in stopnje napak, o kateri je poročalo Računsko sodišče;
Calls on the Commission to set up a system for calculating and reporting on the overall administrative cost involved in delivering its development assistance;
poziva države članice, naj učinkovito izvajajo obstoječe upravne preglede, pri čemer naj uporabijo vse ustrezne informacije, ki so na voljo plačilnim agencijam, saj bi na ta način lahko odkrili in odpravili večino napak;
Requests that the Commission define and apply robust and objectively verifiable conditions for any continuing budget support programmes, in particular giving sufficient attention to support for anti-corruption mechanisms;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj se prednostno osredotočijo na stroškovno učinkovitost kontrol, zlasti z nadaljnjim razvojem uporabe kontrol, ki temeljijo na tveganju;
Recalls that corruption is a serious problem in Central Asian countries; points out that in Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index, all Central Asian countries were rated at less than 28 out of 100 in 2011, with Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan in the bottom 10 % of the 182 countries surveyed;
poziva Komisijo, naj na področju razvoja podeželja zagotovi, da bodo njeni organi za potrjevanje kot tudi revizijski organi enako uporabljali in upoštevali enotne standarde in postopke;
Considers that such pervasive corruption may affect the Commission's reputation and reduce the effectiveness of the support programmes;
Del VII
Is of the opinion that disbursement decisions should be based on progress achieved by partner countries rather than on their commitments to reform; underlines the importance of ensuring an appropriate policy dialogue based on an incentive-based approach and a continuous monitoring of sector reforms and programmes measuring performance and the sustainability of the results;
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 1/2014 z naslovom „Uspešnost projektov javnega mestnega prometa, ki prejemajo podporo EU“
Calls for greater transparency in the allocation of funds by Union and Member States' embassies to support genuinely independent non-governmental partners so as to help them play an effective role in the development and consolidation of civil society;
poudarja, da so evropski strukturni in investicijski skladi najpomembnejši vir financiranja Unije za projekte mobilnosti v mestih in da so takšni projekti ne le ključni za dostopnost mestnih območij v manj razvitih regijah Unije, ampak imajo tudi družbene in okoljske vidike, ki so pomembni za kakovost življenja državljanov Unije;
Requests that the Commission improve the programme design and delivery in light of lessons learnt and changing circumstances;
poudarja vedno večji pomen nadaljnje finančne pomoči Unije, pri čemer je treba upoštevati zlasti negativne posledice širitve mest ter obete nadaljnje stalne rasti mestnega prebivalstva;
Asks the Commission to report on results and impact in a way that allows comparison with plans and objectives;
poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti, da bodo tako Komisija kot države članice projekte mobilnosti v mestih izvajale odgovorno, uspešno in učinkovito ter si prizadevale za oprijemljive rezultate, ne pa zgolj črpale razpoložljiva sredstva;
Part III
ob upoštevanju načela solidarnosti ponavlja poziv državam članicam iz sporočila Komisije z dne 17. decembra 2013 z naslovom „Skupaj h konkurenčni in z viri gospodarni mobilnosti v mestih“ (COM(2013) 913):
Special Report No 15/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Has the Environment component of the LIFE programme been effective?’
naj zagotovijo podrobne ocene sedanje in bodoče uspešnosti, usklajevanja in vključevanja načrtov trajnostne mobilnosti v mestih (SUMP) v širše mestne in ozemeljske strategije in po potrebi dopolnijo tehnična in druga orodja, ki so na razpolago organom za načrtovanje;
Highlights the need for the LIFE Programme to act as a catalyst for changes in policy development and implementation; stresses the need for the Commission to set clear, specific, measurable and achievable objectives for projects to be funded;
naj se pri mestni logistiki osredinijo na infrastrukturo ter primerna vozila kot orodji za doseganje trajnostne mobilnosti v mestih;
Emphasises the need for projects financed by the LIFE Programme to contribute to the achievement of the specific objectives of more than one of the Programme's priority areas; underlines the need of the funded projects to avoid isolation and on the contrary to encompass transnational character, and to contribute in a measurable fashion to dissemination, sustainability and replication of their output across other Member States;
poziva Komisijo in oblasti v državah članicah, naj upoštevajo negativen vpliv finančne krize na uporabo prometnih sistemov in več pozornosti namenijo ciljem in kazalnikom, zlasti tistim na obrazcih za prijavo projektov, da bi ugotovile morebitna tveganja in v bodočih projektih preprečile preveliko mero optimizma, s tem pa preprečile takšna preseganja časovnih okvirov in stroškov, kot so navedena v posebnem poročilu;
Notes that selection of the best projects can sometimes be distorted by the national allocations; encourages the Member States to keep a geographical balance by proposing more integrated projects, but reiterates that the funds should be first of all distributed based on the merits of the projects and not in a manner detrimental to the quality of the projects;
poziva Komisijo, naj opravi temeljitejše analize stroškov in koristi okvirnih proračunov projektov mobilnosti v mestih in naj deli najboljše prakse z državami članicami, pa tudi spodbuja takšno izmenjavo med njimi, s tem pa podpira oblasti pri uspešnem izvajanju projektov, za katere ni potrebno, da jih potrdi Komisija;
Notes that particular attention should be paid to potential of projects to be disseminated, sustained and replicated; calls on the Commission to set clear indicators assessing dissemination, sustainability and replication potential of assessed projects in order to achieve the programme's objectives; encourages the Commission to follow up on these objectives;
vztraja, naj Komisija spodbuja države članice, da uporabljajo instrument Jaspers (skupna pomoč pri pripravi projektov v evropskih regijah), in naj v celoti izkoristi možnosti tega instrumenta za pomoč pri razvoju in oceni kakovosti projektov mobilnosti v mestih, ki se financirajo s sredstvi evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov;
Calls on the Commission to improve its programme management tools in order to avoid non-transparent selection procedures; considers that this includes improvement of the project selection evaluation forms, introducing detailed templates for assessments of the claimed costs, appropriate project monitoring, introducing adequate common output and result indicators, and thorough follow-up of project monitoring;
vendar opozarja na dejstvo, da javni mestni promet ni zgolj dobičkonosna dejavnost, ampak tudi bistven in včasih nenadomestljiv element sistemov mobilnosti mnogih velikih mest tudi v razvitejših regijah, saj tudi ta trpijo zaradi „mestnega paradoksa“ zaradi obstoja socialno ranljivih okrožij;
Part IV
zato poziva ustrezne oblasti, naj v celoti upoštevajo družbeno razsežnost projektov javnega mestnega prometa, ki temeljijo na primernih utemeljitvah, navedenih na prijavnici;
Special Report No 16/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Taking stock of “single audit” and the Commission's reliance on the work of national audit authorities in cohesion’
poziva Komisijo, naj hitro sprejme ustrezne izvedbene in delegirane akte, da bi preprečila morebitne zamude, pri čemer priznava, da je za prometne projekte običajno potrebnega veliko časa za pripravo in izvajanje;
Emphasises the potential efficiency gains from a single audit chain based on common principles and standards; encourages the Member States, the Commission and the Court of Auditors to continue their efforts in this respect; considers that such a single audit system should also take account of multiannual programme cycles;
vztraja, da se izvedejo elementi iz priloge k zgoraj navedenemu sporočilu Komisije z dne 17. decembra 2013, kar vključuje tudi:
Reminds the Commission of Parliament's remarks [10] concerning the Court of Auditors' findings in its 2012 Annual Report: ‘[s]tresses that the findings of the Court of Auditors' audit indicate weaknesses in the “first-level checks” on expenditure [in Member States]; observes that, for 56 % of the regional policy transactions affected by error (quantifiable and/or non-quantifiable), the Court of Auditors considers that sufficient information was available for the Member State authorities to have detected and corrected one or more of the errors before certifying the expenditure to the Commission’; notes that this is why Parliament endorsed the reservation issued by the Director-General of DG REGIO concerning ERDF/Cohesion Fund/IPA management and control systems for the 2007-2013 programming period in 17 Member States (72 programmes) and asked for rapid actions to be taken;
celovit pregled trenutnih razmer in izhodišče v obliki revizije uspešnosti mobilnosti v mestih, ki bi predstavljalo merilo za napredek v prihodnosti;
Remains therefore convinced that Member States must become much more vigilant when managing structural funds;
določitev „kritičnih točk“ na mestnih območjih, kjer je uspešnost sedanjega prometnega sistema še posebej slaba;
Emphasises in this context the significance of introducing national declarations, signed at the appropriate, preferably political, level, and building on annual management declarations (Article 59(5) of the Financial Regulation);
ustrezne kazalnike uspešnosti, ki jih bo mogoče primerno spremljati;
Welcomes the fact that since 2009 the Commission has carried out extensive audits on the spot to review the work of audit authorities; notes that it carried out 269 audit missions and reviewed 47 and 84 Audit Authorities for ERDF and ESF, respectively; notes that the missions covered approximately 96 % and 99 % of the total allocations, respectively; is of the opinion that during a financing period the Commission should audit all operational programmes (OP) at least once;
posebne cilje glede uspešnosti, ki bodo realistično ambiciozni v zvezi s cilji posameznega načrta za trajnostno mobilnost v mestih;
Welcomes the Commission's use of payment interruptions and suspensions when errors exceed the 2 % materiality threshold; considers that these are useful instruments to protect the Union's financial interests and is convinced that the Commission should concentrate their own audit efforts on ‘bad performers’;
izmerljive cilje, ki temeljijo na realistični oceni izhodišča in razpoložljivih virov, da bi odražali posebne cilje načrta za trajnostno mobilnost v mestih;
Is of the opinion that Member States should supply the Commission with sufficiently detailed information about their audits;
opozarja na pomanjkanje zadostnih kazalnikov za merjenje učinkovitosti projektov mestnega prometa, navedenih v Uredbi (EU) št. 1301/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12] (uredba o ESRR), in vztraja, da mora Komisija v izvedbene in delegirane akte, povezane s temi vrstami projektov, vključiti primernejše kazalnike, pri tem pa upoštevati kazalnike, ki jih priporoča Računsko sodišče.
Supports the Court of Auditors' recommendation that the Commission should take appropriate measures so that audit authorities can draw on a stable and binding methodological framework which ensures that Union spending in all Member States is checked according to the same standards and that the results are reported accurately;
Del VIII
Notes with satisfaction that the Commission presented on 13 December 2013 a communication on the application of net financial corrections on Member States for Agriculture and Cohesion Policy (COM(2013) 934); emphasises however that it will depend on many factors whether the new instrument will lead to more net corrections and hence to a lower error rate in cohesion policy;
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 2/2014 z naslovom „Se preferencialni trgovinski režimi ustrezno upravljajo?“
Calls on the Court of Auditors and the Commission to develop an audit instrument which, on the one hand, records annually errors and irregularities while, on the other hand, also takes into consideration financial correction during the programming period;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo z oceno upravljanja preferencialnih trgovinskih ureditev v okviru izključne pristojnosti Unije kot pomemben prispevek k skupni politični razpravi o zunanji trgovini in razvojnih politikah Unije; je seznanjen z ugotovitvami in priporočili iz poročila in v nadaljevanju navaja svoje pripombe in priporočila;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has updated the roadmap for the implementation and monitoring of the correct implementation of the ‘single audit’ principle in September 2013, compliance with which should put national authorities in a position to obtain the ‘single audit status’; requests a copy of this document;
je resno zaskrbljen, ker Komisija ni ustrezno ocenila vseh gospodarskih učinkov preferencialnih trgovinskih režimov in ker ni zagotovljeno, da bodo prihodki pobrani v celoti;