natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes with concern from the Court's report that, although significant progress was made during 2013 as regards the Joint Undertaking's internal control system, a number of actions still need to be implemented; these actions include further development of the process for managing the cost estimate at contract level, as well as the audit results arising from the implementation of the overall control and monitoring strategy for grants and operational contracts not being made available at the time of the audit; calls on the Joint Undertaking to make the report available as per the request of the Court;
ugotavlja, da je služba za notranjo revizijo Komisije v letu 2014 spremljala, kako inštitut izvaja sprejeta priporočila iz omejenega pregleda upravljanja nepovratnih sredstev – priprava letnih sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev; poleg tega opaža, da je ta omejeni pregled privedel do šestih priporočil, od katerih je bilo eno označeno s „kritično“, štiri pa z „zelo pomembno“, na ta priporočila se je inštitut odzval s pripravo podrobnega akcijskega načrta, ki je vključeval 25 ukrepov, od katerih bi jih 13 moralo biti sprejetih do 31. avgusta 2013 ali prej, 10 pa je bilo do tega datuma označenih s „pripravljeno na pregled“;
Points out with concern that with the exception of the action plan which resulted as a response to the internal audit on management of experts' contracts, the other action plans adopted by the Joint undertaking in response to the internal audits had not been fully implemented;
obžaluje, da je služba za notranjo revizijo opravila pregled dokumentacije o stanju izvajanja teh desetih ukrepov in 24. septembra 2013 prišla do slepa, da bodisi je stopnja izvajanja nezadostna bodisi so potrebna dodatna preverjanja na kraju samem, da bi bilo mogoče potrditi izvajanje v praksi; je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je inštitut posledično preoblikoval nekatere ukrepe in revidiral z njimi povezane roke, da bi upošteval pripombe službe za notranjo revizijo;
Calls on the Joint Undertaking to provide timely tender specifications in order to eliminate cost uncertainties associated with the possible evolution of ITER project design and planning;
je zaskrbljen zaradi sklepov iz nadaljnjega poročila službe za notranjo revizijo, v katerem je poudarjeno tveganje, da inštitut ne bo zmogel pravočasno in v celoti izvesti vseh ukrepov, zlasti tistih, katerih dokončanje je načrtovano v drugem četrtletju 2014; meni, da so te zamude pri izvajanju nesprejemljive, saj bi po mnenju službe za notranjo revizijo utegnile privesti do še večjega tveganja za organizacijo;
Acknowledges from the Court's report that, as regards the actions adopted in response to the previously identified main risks, 12 were implemented, 19 were in progress and 6 had not been started by November 2013; calls on the Joint Undertaking to rectify these issues as a matter of urgency;
je seznanjen z zavezo inštituta, da bo spremljal predhodno preverjanje, da bi pridobil razumno zagotovilo o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, povezanih z nepovratnimi sredstvi;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking adopted specific rules preventing potential conflicts of interest of the members of its Governing Board, Executive Committee, Audit Committee and experts; points out that rules regarding staff members as well as a database for the general declarations of interest have not been set up until the time of the audit; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the Rules on the management of the conflict of interests regarding staff members have been adopted by the Governing Board and entered into force on 1 July 2014; notes furthermore that a dedicated database for general declarations started to be elaborated;
poziva inštitut, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice zagotovi podrobno poročilo o izvedbi priporočil službe za notranjo revizijo in o ukrepih, sprejetih glede priporočil funkcije notranje revizije do 1. septembra 2015;
Operational procurement contracts and grants
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja Artemis za proračunsko leto 2013
Notes that out of the 41 operational tendering procedures launched in 2013, negotiated procedures constituted 44 %; points out that this percentage is higher by 4 % in comparison to the number registered in 2012; agrees with the Court's recommendation that an increase of the competitiveness of procurement procedures is needed by reducing the use of negotiated procedures; takes note that the average number of proposals for grants was only one per call; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that due to the low average value, the negotiated procedures referred to by the Court only correspond to 15 % of the Joint Undertaking's yearly commitment;
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja Artemis za proračunsko leto 2013,
Notes with concern the on-going weaknesses related to the Joint Undertaking's operational procurement procedures; calls on the Joint Undertaking to submit to the discharge authority a detailed report regarding the procurement procedures that took place from 2008 until present, outlining the following:
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A8-0103/2015),
In how many procedures has a significant cost increase (more than 5 %) taken place with respect to the initial set cost frame of contract and what were the exact reasons for the increases,
A. ker je bilo Skupno podjetje Artemis (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno decembra 2007 za obdobje 10 let z namenom opredeliti in izvesti raziskovalni program za razvoj ključnih tehnologij za vgrajene računalniške sisteme na različnih področjih uporabe, da bi izboljšali evropsko konkurenčnost in trajnostnost ter omogočili oblikovanje novih trgov in družbenih aplikacij;
Which procedures suffered from a considerable time delay compared to their initial target date and what have been the financial consequences deriving from such delays,
B. ker je začelo skupno podjetje samostojno delovati oktobra 2009;
How does the Joint Undertaking ensure for the future that the set dates of contract signature are being met,
C. ker je najvišji prispevek Unije za skupno podjetje v obdobju desetih let 420000000 EUR, izplača pa se iz proračuna sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave;
Which procurement procedures did not set a specific target date at all when awarding the contracts,
D. ker bi morali prispevki držav članic, ki sodelujejo v podjetju Artemis, skupaj znašati najmanj 1,8-krat toliko kot finančni prispevek Unije, prispevki v naravi organizacij za raziskave in razvoj, ki sodelujejo v projektih, pa bi morali biti v obdobju delovanja skupnega podjetja enaki ali večji kot prispevki javnih organov;
In which procedures did the Joint Undertaking not advertise the respective contract by means of a pre-information notice, thus failing to increase the competitiveness of the procedure and what were the reasons for this as well as which contractual partners did particularly benefit from the consequently limited competiveness,
E. ker sta bili skupni podjetji ENIAC in Artemis združeni zaradi ustanovitve skupne tehnološke pobude za elektronske komponente in sisteme za evropski vodilni položaj (ECSEL), ki je začela delovati junija 2014 in se bo izvajala deset let;
What procedures (besides the applicable Staff Regulations) are in place to prevent a possible conflict of interest in relation to members of staff involved in tendering procedures and in how many cases were members of staff not formally mandated to be involved in tendering procedures,
F. ker je bilo poročilo Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2013 pripravljeno v skladu z načelom delujočega podjetja;
How does the Joint Undertaking ensure that its internal decision making procedure is improved to avoid further time delays in tender procedures, as determined by the Court, in order to guarantee transparent, timely and lawful tenders for the future,
je seznanjen, da je bila strategija naknadnih revizij skupnega podjetja, sprejeta 25. novembra 2010, 20. februarja 2013 spremenjena; na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da je ta strategija tako postala ključno orodje za ocenjevanje zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij;
Notes with concern from the Court's report that the following weaknesses were identified after auditing five operational procurement procedures:
na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da so v letu 2013 izvršena plačila, povezana z izjavami o prevzemu stroškov, ki jih izdajo nacionalni organi financiranja držav članic, znašala 11700000 EUR, kar je 57 % vseh plačil za poslovanje;
the Joint Undertaking failed to advertise one contract by means of a pre-information notice in one procurement procedure; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the contract in discussion was launched before the procedure of pre-information notice was approved in September 2012;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da upravni sporazumi, podpisani z nacionalnimi organi financiranja, ne vsebujejo praktičnih ureditev za naknadne revizije, čeprav je bilo revidiranje zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov projektov zaupano tem organom;
in one procurement procedure, an increase of 32 % was observed in comparison to the initial cost estimate; notes furthermore that in two other procurement procedures, due to the nature of the information available in the files, the reconciliation of the difference between the final contract value with the initial estimation value was proven as complicated; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the complexity of the reconciliation is due to the re-evaluation of the initial scope of the contract, which led to an increase of time as well as to the nature, complexity and amounts involved in such contracts;
ugotavlja, da mora skupno podjetje v skladu s strategijo naknadnih revizij, ki jo je sprejel njegov upravni odbor, vsaj enkrat letno preveriti, ali informacije, ki so jih posredovali nacionalni organi financiranja, dajejo zadostno zagotovilo o pravilnosti in zakonitosti izvršenih transakcij;
one procedure was found not to have specific guidelines and procedures to ensure that the deliverables, used as input documents for the tendering procedures from the third parties, were uniformly and systematically reviewed and formally accepted by the Joint Undertaking; takes note that the Joint Undertaking will prepare a formal checklist in order to ensure appropriate use of third-party information; calls on the Joint Undertaking to implement the checklist as soon as possible in order to avoid such situations in the future;
na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje prejelo revizijska poročila nacionalnih organov financiranja, ki zajemajo približno 46 % stroškov, povezanih z dokončanimi projekti; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje ni ocenilo kakovosti teh revizij in da do konca marca 2014 še ni prejelo informacij o revizijskih strategijah sedmih izmed 23 nacionalnih organov financiranja; prav tako ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje zato ni moglo oceniti, ali naknadne revizije dajejo zadostno zagotovilo o pravilnosti in zakonitosti povezanih transakcij;
amendments to the original contract of one of the procurement procedures increased the contract's value by 15 % compared to the initial amount; points out that the information available was not sufficient to conclude that the assessment of the materiality of the amendments was performed as required by the Joint Undertaking's internal procedures;
je seznanjen z informacijo skupnega podjetja, da je bil poleg izboljšav strategije naknadnih revizij predložen tudi akcijski načrt za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je opredelilo Računsko sodišče v svojem mnenju s pridržkom; potrjuje, da je od skupnega podjetja prejel najnovejše informacije o uvedbi naknadnih revizij; pričakuje mnenje Računskega sodišča o predlagani novi formuli za izračun ocenjene preostale stopnje napake pri transakcijah skupnega podjetja; ugotavlja, da se je načrt začel izvajati leta 2014; se veseli uspešne izvedbe celotnega akcijskega načrta in mnenja Računskega sodišča o končnem rezultatu; poudarja, da bi utegnilo priti do težav glede razmejitve suverenih pristojnosti nacionalnih organov financiranja in pristojnosti skupnega podjetja; poziva skupno podjetje, naj posreduje prvo vmesno ocenjevalno poročilo o izvajanju akcijskega načrta;
one procedure's dialogue phase was long delayed, resulting in the final contract conditions and the updated technical version of the tender specifications being sent later than planned as well as in signing the contract four months after the target date;
na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da so sredstva za prevzem obveznosti v prvotnem proračunu skupnega podjetja za leto 2013 znašala 68,9 milijona EUR in da je bil proračun ob koncu leta spremenjen, tako da se je ta znesek zmanjšal na 32,6 milijona EUR; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je zaradi tega zmanjšanja stopnja uporabe sredstev za plačila znašala samo 69 %, stopnja uporabe operativnih sredstev za prevzem obveznosti pa 99,4 %; ugotavlja, da je nizka stopnja proračunskega izvrševanja v glavnem posledica dolgotrajnega in zapletenega postopka za finančni zaključek projektov;
Finds it unacceptable that the Joint Undertaking has not developed an internal procedure for the staff involved in tendering procedures; points out that improvement in this area is urgently needed;
je seznanjen, da ustanovitvena uredba skupnega podjetja predvideva najvišji skupni proračun v znesku 410 milijonov EUR za kritje odhodkov iz poslovanja; ugotavlja tudi, da prevzete obveznosti za javne razpise trenutno znašajo 201 milijon EUR, kar je 49 % skupnega proračuna;
Notes from the Court's report that in two procurement procedures the Joint Undertaking staff members providing technical advice during the evaluation of the offers, upon request of the evaluation committee, had not been formally nominated by the Appointing Authority, either as members of the evaluation committee or as experts providing technical advice to the committee; points out that in one tendering procedure following the call for expression of interest, the Authorising Officer appointed a team to conduct a dialogue with the candidates selected whilst there was no formal mandate for this team to set out the dialogue strategy, the objectives to be achieved and the technical, financial and contractual parameters for the negotiations;
je zaskrbljen, ker je na voljo malo informacij o ocenah, ali prispevki držav članic ter organizacij za raziskave in razvoj ustrezajo dejanski ravni izplačil Unije; na osnovi prejetih informacij ugotavlja, da prispevek držav članic ne dosega 1,8-kratne vrednosti, kot zahteva statut skupnega podjetja; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice predloži poročilo o prispevkih vseh članov razen Komisije, vključno z uporabo pravil za vrednotenje, priloži pa naj tudi oceno Komisije;
Overall control and monitoring of operational procurement contracts and grants
upošteva, da je bila nova finančna uredba, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Unije, sprejeta 25. oktobra 2012 in je začela veljati 1. januarja 2013, vendar pa je vzorčna finančna uredba za subjekte javno-zasebnega partnerstva iz člena 209 nove finančne uredbe začela veljati šele 8. februarja 2014; ugotavlja, da zaradi združitve v skupno podjetje ECSEL finančna pravila skupnega podjetja niso bila spremenjena, da bi odražala te spremembe;
Acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking has a system for performing audits at the level of contractors with the aim of checking compliance with the quality assurance requirements; notes that the result of ex-post audits on grants and financial compliance verifications on contract implementation arising from the implementation of the overall monitoring and control strategy were not available at the time of the Court's audit in April 2014;
je seznanjen s skupno izjavo Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije [1] ter posledičnim političnim dogovorom o posebni razrešnici, ki jo Parlament v skladu s členom 209 finančne uredbe na priporočilo Sveta podeli skupnim podjetjem;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking has not amended its financial rules in order to reflect the changes brought by the new Financial Regulation and the framework financial regulation for the bodies [2] referred to in Article 208 of the new Financial Regulation; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that it assessed the changes and proposed the amendments to its Governing Board; notes that in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2007/198/Euratom, the Commission is to issue an opinion prior to submission of the final version of the financial rules to the Joint Undertaking's Governing Board; calls on the Commission and the Joint Undertaking to remedy this issue without delay;
znova poziva Računsko sodišče, naj predloži popolno in ustrezno finančno oceno pravic in obveznosti skupnega podjetja za obdobje do datuma, ko je začelo poslovati skupno podjetje ECSEL;
Notes the Joint Statement by the Parliament, the Council and the Commission [3] and the subsequent political agreement reached on the separate discharge for Joint Undertakings;
je zaskrbljen, ker skupno podjetje ni ustanovilo službe za notranjo revizijo, kot zahteva člen 6(2) njegove ustanovitvene uredbe; ugotavlja tudi, da je upravni odbor 25. novembra 2010 sicer sprejel listino o delu službe Komisije za notranjo revizijo, vendar finančna pravila skupnega podjetja niso bila spremenjena, zato ne vsebujejo določb vzorčne finančne uredbe o pooblastilih notranjega revizorja Komisije;
Intellectual property rights and industrial policy
je seznanjen, da je služba za notranjo revizijo v letu 2013 revidirala ustreznost in uspešnost sistema notranjih kontrol skupnega podjetja, kar zadeva upravljanje strokovnjakov; je seznanjen z revizijsko ugotovitvijo, da sedanji sistem notranje kontrole daje razumno zagotovilo za doseganje ciljev skupnega podjetja na področju upravljanja strokovnjakov; ugotavlja še, da je bilo med revizijo danih tudi več priporočil glede sprejetja celovite politike zaupnosti, občutljivosti mesta vodje programa in pravil za razporeditev delovne obremenitve izvajalcev vrednotenja na daljavo;
Takes note that the Decision on the implementation of the Fusion for Energy Industrial Policy and the Policy on Intellectual Property Rights and dissemination of information were adopted by the Joint Undertaking's Governing Board on 27 June 2013; notes that the Joint Undertaking has not yet adopted and implemented certain measures aimed at mitigating specific risks related to the protection of the intellectual property rights and the dissemination of research results; acknowledges the Joint Undertaking's opinion that the costs of implementation of such measures do not appear proportionate to the size of the residual risk and would be difficult to implement in practice;
je seznanjen, da je služba za notranjo revizijo za skupna podjetja Artemis, Čisto nebo, ENIAC, FCH in IMI opravila oceno tveganja za IT v zvezi s skupnimi infrastrukturami IT, ki si jih ta podjetja delijo;
Notes from the Court's report that the Joint Undertaking's contractors are offered exclusive exploitation rights over intellectual property produced in fields outside fusion, while in the field of fusion the contractors have non-exclusive rights; notes the potential exposure of the Joint Undertaking to the risk regarding its obligations to retain the right to access the full intellectual property rights involved in the European in-kind contributions and in being able to transfer the access right to the ITER Organisation, if needed; agrees with the Court's recommendation that monitoring the application of the clause of the contracts is needed, in order to oblige the contractors to refrain from carrying out any dissemination of research results until a decision about their possible protection is made; calls on the Joint Undertaking to define boundaries of what would be considered as fusion application in order to ensure maximum clarity and transparency in relation to contractors.
je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo v poročilu Računskega sodišča, da načrt ponovne vzpostavitve delovanja po nesreči za skupno infrastrukturo IT skupnega podjetja še ni odobren; ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje sprejelo lastne ukrepe za izredne razmere;
Council conclusions on ITER status of 7 July 2010 (ref.11902/10).
Navzkrižje interesov
OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje ni upoštevalo priporočila organa za podelitev razrešnice iz leta 2014 in ni sprejelo celovite politike za preprečevanje in obvladovanja navzkrižja interesov; znova poudarja, da je treba jasno opredeliti, kaj je navzkrižje interesov, in da se mora to nanašati tako na finančne kot na nefinančne interese;
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013
poziva skupno podjetje, naj do konca septembra 2015 poskrbi za hitro, popolno in poglobljeno razkritje življenjepisov in izjav o interesih izvršnega direktorja in članov upravnega odbora; zahteva tudi, da podjetje do konca septembra 2015 vzpostavi redno posodobljeno podatkovno zbirko, ki bo zajemala vse informacije, povezane z navzkrižji interesov, ter postopek za njihovo upravljanje in mehanizem za obravnavo kršitev pravilnika;
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013,
poziva skupno podjetje, naj sprejme celovito politiko za obvladovanje situacij v zvezi z navzkrižjem interesov, kot so: javni uradnik se odreče svojim interesom, javni uradnik se odreče udeležbi v spornem postopku odločanja, dostop javnega uradnika do določenih informacij je omejen, javnemu uradniku se dodelijo druge naloge ali pa odstopi s svojega položaja;
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0110/2015),
glede na to, da se je skupno podjetje leta 2014 združilo v skupno podjetje ECSEL, kot organ za podelitev razrešnice slednje poziva, naj ne odlaša s sprejetjem pravilnika o navzkrižjih interesov;
A. whereas the SESAR Joint Undertaking (‘the Joint Undertaking’) was set up in February 2007 to run the Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research (SESAR) programme that aims to modernise air traffic management in Europe,
je seznanjen, da sklep o sedmem okvirnem programu [2] vzpostavlja sistem spremljanja in poročanja, ki zajema varstvo, razširjanje in prenos rezultatov raziskav; potrjuje, da je skupno podjetje razvilo postopke za spremljanje varstva in razširjanja rezultatov raziskav v različnih fazah projekta; na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je treba to spremljanje še razviti, da bo v celoti ustrezalo določbam sklepa;
B. whereas the SESAR project is divided into a ‘definition phase’ (2004-2007) led by Eurocontrol, a first ‘development phase’ (2008-2016), funded by the 2008-2013 programming period managed by the Joint Undertaking and a ‘deployment phase’ (2014-2020) running in parallel to the ‘development phase’; whereas the deployment phase is expected to be led by industry and stakeholders for the large-scale production and implementation of the new air traffic management infrastructure,
je seznanjen, da je Komisija med septembrom 2012 in februarjem 2013 izvedla drugo vmesno vrednotenje skupnih podjetij Artemis in ENIAC, ki je zajelo ustreznost, uspešnost, učinkovitost in kakovost raziskav; ugotavlja, da je bilo poročilo izdano maja 2013 in da je vsebovalo številna priporočila za skupno podjetje; opozarja, da se ta priporočila nanašajo na učinkovitost pregledov projektov, boljše ujemanje portfelja projektov s strateškimi cilji Unije ter ustrezna merila za merjenje učinka in uspeha projektov;
C. whereas the Joint Undertaking started to work autonomously in 2007,
Člen 7 Sklepa št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str. 6).