natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Activities of other membership organisations n.e.c.
Dejavnosti drugih članskih organizacij d. n.
Motion picture and video production
Snemanje filmov in video filmov
Motion picture projection
Kinematografska dejavnost
Radio and television activities
Radijske in televizijske dejavnosti
Operation of arts facilities
Upravljanje objektov za kulture prireditve
Fair and amusement park activities
Dejavnost sejmišč in zabaviščnih parkov
Library and archives activities
Dejavnosti knjižnic in arhivov
Museum activities
Dejavnosti muzejev
Preservation of historical sites and buildings
Varstvo kulturne dediščine
Operation of sports arenas and stadiums
Upravljanje športnih prizorišč in stadionov
Sport clubs and associations
Športni klubi in združenja
Other sporting activities n.e.c.
Druge športne dejavnosti d. n.
Activities and adventure companies
Dejavnosti športno turističnih agencij
Other recreational services n.e.c.
Druge storitve za rekreacijo d. n.
Washing and dry-cleaning of textile and fur products
Pralnice in kemične čistilnice za tekstil in izdelke iz krzna
Hairdressing and other beauty treatment
Frizerske in druge lepotne storitve
Funeral and related activities
Pogrebne in s tem povezane storitve
Physical well-being activities
Dejavnosti za dobro telesno počutje
the basis of the ECON report, the Norwegian authorities have established the following criteria to differentiate between undertakings not subject to competition from undertakings located in other EEA States and those undertakings which are affected by EEA-wide competition, regarding the economic sectors marked with the ciphers 0/2:
0Norveške oblasti so na podlagi poročila ECON vzpostavile naslednja merila za razlikovanje med podjetji, ki niso izpostavljena konkurenci podjetij iz drugih držav EGP, in podjetji, na katere vpliva konkurenca znotraj EGP v zvezi z gospodarskimi sektorji, označenimi s ciframa 0/2:
NACE 22.120 and 22.210: publishing and printing of newspapers
NACE 22.120 in 22.210: izdajanje in tiskanje časopisov
Due to language, culture and distance, the publishing and printing of local newspapers is considered to operate only in local markets.
Zaradi jezika, kulture in oddaljenosti se izdajanje in tiskanje krajevnih časopisov opravlja le na lokalnih trgih.
A newspaper is considered local as long as it is not nationwide.
Časopis velja za krajevnega, dokler ni nacionalni.
NACE 35.111 and 35.113: building and repairing of ships and hulls over 100 tons and under 100 tons
NACE 35.111 in 35.113: gradnja in popravila ladij in ladijskih trupov nad 100 ton in pod 100 ton
As long as the repair concerns ships operating in Norwegian waters or in acute difficulties, the given shipyards are considered to operate locally and thus not subject to competition from other EEA States.
Za dane ladjedelnice velja, da delujejo krajevno in tako niso izpostavljene konkurenci iz drugih držav EGP, dokler popravilo zadeva ladje, ki delujejo v norveških vodah ali pa so v hudi nevarnosti.
NACE 51.170: agents involved in the sale of food, beverages and tobacco
NACE 51.170: posredniki pri prodaji živil, pijač in tobačnih izdelkov
The Norwegian authorities have not provided any further explanation on the eligibility criteria applicable to undertakings of this sector.
Norveške oblasti niso predpisale nobene nadaljnje razlage meril upravičenosti, ki se uporabljajo za podjetja v tem sektorju.
According to the ECON report, it was not possible to separate undertakings subject to competition from those which are not on the basis of the information available.
Glede na poročilo ECON na podlagi dostopnih informacij ni bilo mogoče ločiti podjetij, ki so izpostavljena konkurenci, od tistih, ki niso.
NACE 52.110: retail sale in non-specialised stores with food, beverages or tobacco predominating
NACE 52.110: trgovina na drobno v nespecializiranih trgovinah, kjer prevladujejo živila, pijača ali tobačni izdelki
Undertakings that are located at a distance of more than 150 kilometres from competitors on the other side of the national border are considered not to be exposed to competition from other EEA States.
Za podjetja, ki so od konkurenčnih podjetij na drugi strani državne meje oddaljena več kot 150 kilometrov, velja, da niso izpostavljena konkurenci iz drugih držav EGP.
According to the information submitted by the Norwegian authorities, the use of a critical distance of 150 km was established by identifying the nearest competitors situated on the other side of the border to undertakings with the standard industrial classification 52.110, non-specialised retail sales.
Glede na informacije, ki so jih predložile norveške oblasti, je bila uporaba kritične oddaljenosti 150 km določena z opredelitvijo najbližjih podjetij na drugi strani meje, ki so konkurenčna podjetjem s standardno industrijsko klasifikacijo 52.110, nespecializirana trgovina na drobno.
The competition conditions were considered with respect to undertakings located at varying distances from the nearest competitor on the other side of the border.
Konkurenčni pogoji so bili obravnavani glede na podjetja, ki so različno oddaljena od najbližjega konkurenta na drugi strani meje.
On the basis of the conclusions of the ECON report, the Norwegian authorities stated that the probability that undertakings situated more than 150 km from a competitor are exposed to competition from undertakings in other EEA States is low.
Norveške oblasti so na podlagi sklepov poročila ECON navedle, da je verjetnost, da so podjetja, ki so več kot 150 km oddaljena od konkurentov, izpostavljena konkurenci podjetij v drugih državah EGP, majhna.
The Norwegian authorities acknowledge that whether there is actual competition depends on the assortment of goods offered.
Norveške oblasti priznavajo, da je dejanski obstoj konkurence odvisen od izbora ponujenega blaga.
NACE 52.120, 52.420 and 52.443: other retail sale in non-specialised stores, retail sale of clothing and retail sale of furniture
NACE 52.120, 52.420 in 52.443: druga trgovina na drobno v nespecializiranih prodajalnah, trgovina na drobno z oblačili in trgovina na drobno s pohištvom
Although the distance to competitors on the other side of the border is of significance, the Norwegian authorities acknowledge that it is difficult to determine an absolute and decisive limit between undertakings affected by intra-EEA trade and those which are not affected.
Čeprav je oddaljenost od konkurentov na drugi strani meje pomembna, norveške oblasti priznavajo, da je težko določiti dokončno in odločilno mejo med podjetji, na katere vpliva trgovina znotraj EGP, in podjetji, na katere trgovina ne vpliva.
Whereas undertakings located approximately 200 km from a relatively large shopping centre on the other side of the border are exposed to competition, according to the findings of the ECON report, undertakings located closer to the border, but without having any large shopping centre on the other side, are not exposed to competition.
Glede na ugotovitve poročila ECON so podjetja, ki so približno 200 km oddaljena od razmeroma velikega nakupovalnega središča na drugi strani meje, izpostavljena konkurenci, podjetja bližje meji, ki pa niso v bližini velikega nakupovalnega središča na drugi strani, pa niso izpostavljena konkurenci.
Nevertheless, following the same assessment as for NACE 52.110, the Norwegian authorities have explained in the notification that a distance of 200 km seems an appropriate objective criterion to determine the effect on trade for this sector.
Kljub temu so norveške oblasti na podlagi enake ocene kot za NACE 52.110 v priglasitvi razložile, da se zdi oddaljenost 200 km ustrezno nepristransko merilo, s katerim se določi vpliv trgovine na ta sektor.
NACE 52.461 and 52.464: retail sale of a variety of hardware, paints and glass and retail sale of wood
NACE 52.461 in 52.464: trgovina na drobno z različno železnino, barvami in steklom in trgovina na drobno z lesom
The Norwegian authorities have explained that undertakings located at ‘a very long distance to the national border’ are not exposed to competition from undertakings of other EEA States.
Norveške oblasti so razložile, da podjetja, ki so „zelo oddaljena od državne meje“, niso izpostavljena konkurenci podjetij iz drugih držav EGP.
On the basis of the information provided, ‘a very long distance to the national border’ means that it would not be worth travelling back and forth in one day, whereby the distance depends on i.a. the road standard and traffic conditions.
Na podlagi predloženih informacij „zelo velika razdalja od državne meje“ pomeni, da se ne bi splačalo v enem dnevu potovati tja in nazaj, pri čemer je razdalja odvisna med drugim od cestnih standardov in prometnih razmer.
Undertakings situated in the counties Rogaland, Hordaland, Sogn og Fjordane and Møre og Romsdal can benefit from reduced social security rates since they are not exposed to competition from other EEA States.
Podjetja v okrožjih Rogaland, Hordaland, Sogn og Fjordane in Møre og Romsdal so upravičena do znižanih prispevkov za socialno varnost, ker niso izpostavljena konkurenci iz drugih držav EGP.
Undertakings in other counties are excluded.
Podjetja v drugih okrožjih so izvzeta.
NACE 80.309: education at other colleges
NACE 80.309: izobraževanje v drugih visokošolskih ustanovah
The notification only covers adult education courses which are accordingly considered not to be affected by trade.
Priglasitev zajema le izobraževalne programe za odrasle, za katere skladno s tem velja, da nanje trgovina ne vpliva.
As far as education at college or university level is concerned, the Norwegian authorities have indicated the cipher 2 meaning that the concerned activity is exposed to competition.
Izobraževanje na visokošolski ali univerzitetni ravni so norveške oblasti označile s cifro 2, kar pomeni, da je izpostavljeno konkurenci.
NACE 92.610: operation of sports arenas and stadiums
NACE 92.610: upravljanje športnih prizorišč in stadionov
An athletic club is considered to be local when it does not participate in the highest division in its branch of athletics.
Atletski klub velja za lokalnega, kadar ne sodeluje na najvišji ravni v svoji atletski panogi.
Other sports installations are considered to be local when they are mainly used by local clubs, the local population in the municipality and daytrip visitors, having no competitive offers in other EEA States.
Druge športne ustanove so lokalne, kadar jih večinoma uporabljajo krajevni klubi, prebivalci občine in dnevni obiskovalci in nimajo konkurenčne ponudbe v drugih državah EGP.
The method used for the selection of undertakings covered by the notified measure of regionally differentiated rates of social security contributions
Metoda za izbiro podjetij, vključenih v priglašeni ukrep glede stopnje prispevkov za socialno varnost, ki se razlikujejo po regijah
The notified measure covers a number of economic sectors identified in the ECON report as listed above.
Priglašeni ukrep zajema številne gospodarske sektorje, določene v poročilu ECON in naštete zgoraj.
The ECON report was based on the assessment of the competition interfaces (konkurranseflater) between undertakings located in Zones 2, 3 and 4 in Norway and those in other EEA States.
Poročilo ECON temelji na podlagi ocene konkurenčnih vmesnikov („konkurranseflater“) med podjetji v conah 2, 3 in 4 na Norveškem in tistimi v drugih državah EGP.
It contained a list of sectors supposedly not affected by competition from other EEA States.
Vsebuje seznam sektorjev, ki domnevno niso bili izpostavljeni konkurenci iz drugih držav EGP.
For the manufacturing sector, the list of economic sectors not affected by competition from other EEA States was drafted on the basis of regional data on export and import figures to the relevant zones provided by Statistics Norway.
Za proizvodni sektor je bil seznam gospodarskih sektorjev, ki niso izpostavljeni konkurenci iz drugih držav EGP, zasnovan na podlagi regionalnih podatkov o izvozu in uvozu za ustrezne cone, ki jih je predložil Statistični urad Norveške.
As the Norwegian authorities have explained in the letter dated 12 November 2004, the occurrence of direct trade in nearly all manufacturing sectors (NACE 15 to NACE 37) led ECON to conclude that practically all these sectors may be affected by competition from undertakings in other EEA States.
Kot so norveške oblasti razložile v dopisu z dne 12. novembra 2004, je pojav neposredne trgovine v skoraj vseh proizvodnih sektorjih (NACE 15 do NACE 37) podjetje ECON privedel do sklepa, da so lahko skoraj vsi ti sektorji izpostavljeni konkurenci podjetij iz drugih držav EGP.
The Norwegian authorities have also explained that some very few sectors (publishing and printing of newspapers, building of ships) were nonetheless considered to operate in local markets only based on the nature and the characteristics of these sub-sectors and not on an import/export analysis.
Norveške oblasti so obenem razložile, da za le redko katere sektorje (izdajanje in tiskanje časopisov, gradnja ladij) kljub temu velja, da delujejo na krajevnih trgih, ki temeljijo le na naravi in značilnostih teh podsektorjev in ne na analizi uvoza/izvoza.
As regards undertakings in the services sector (NACE 50 to NACE 99), the exposure to competition was mainly examined on the basis of the knowledge of the market situation in the different business sectors and on interviews with a selection of enterprises in Zones 2, 3 and 4 in Norway.
Kar zadeva podjetja v storitvenem sektorju (NACE 50 do NACE 99), je bila izpostavljenost konkurenci večinoma preučena na podlagi poznavanja razmer na trgu v različnih gospodarskih sektorjih in razgovorov z izbranimi podjetji v conah 2, 3 in 4 na Norveškem.
There is neither an explicit reference to the method followed to determine the exposure of competition in the electricity, gas and water supply (NACE 40) nor in the construction sector (NACE 45), although a great number of the construction sub-sectors have been included in the notification.
Čeprav so v priglasitev vključeni številni gradbeni podsektorji, ne vsebuje izrecnega sklica na metodo za določitev izpostavljenosti konkurenci niti v preskrbi z elektriko, plinom in vodo (NACE 40), niti v gradbeništvu (NACE 45).
According to the ECON report, purely local activities were not affected by intra-EEA trade.
Trgovina znotraj EGP glede na poročilo ECON ni vplivala na izključno lokalne dejavnosti.
To be classified as a purely local activity in terms of the ECON report, two cumulative conditions had to be fulfilled by the relevant economic sector in the given area: The undertakings in the given sector do not participate themselves in cross-border activities and the specific activity located in the actual region is not capable of attracting customers from another location.
V smislu poročila ECON se gospodarski sektor na danem področju lahko uvrsti med izključno lokalne dejavnosti, če izpolnjuje dva skupna pogoja: podjetja v danem sektorju ne sodelujejo v čezmejnih dejavnostih, določena dejavnost v dejanski regiji pa ne more privabljati strank iz drugih krajev.
The ECON report nevertheless does neither contain any proposal for rules as would normally be the case for an aid scheme nor is such a proposal made in the notification.In the introduction to the report, ECON stated that there was not enough time or resources to conduct a thorough analysis of the competition relations within all the economic sectors covered by the report, and that this could lead to both underestimations and overestimations of the competition with undertakings in other EEA States [29].
Prav tako takšnega predloga ni v priglasitvi.V uvodu k poročilu ECON navaja, da ni bilo dovolj časa ali virov za izvedbo temeljite analize konkurenčnih povezav znotraj vseh gospodarskih sektorjev, zajetih v poročilo, kar je lahko pripeljalo do podcenjevanja in tudi do precenjevanja konkurence s podjetji v drugih državah EGP [29].
ECON was nonetheless of the opinion that a reasonable picture of competition between undertakings within the EEA could be drawn from the outcome of the report.3.
Poročilo ECON je kljub temu menilo, da rezultati poročila kažejo pravo podobo konkurence med podjetji znotraj EGP.3.
Concerns in the opening decision
Zadeve v uvodni odločbi
On 6 October 2004, the Authority decided to open the formal investigation procedure on the proposal for regionally differentiated rates of social security contributions for certain economic sectors.
Dne 6. oktobra 2004 se je Organ odločil, da uvede formalni postopek preiskave o predlogu za stopnje prispevkov za socialno varnost, ki se razlikujejo po regijah, za nekatere gospodarske sektorje.
The Authority considered that the proposed application of reduced social security rates in Zones 2, 3 and 4 covered a very broad range of economic sectors and undertakings.
Organ je upošteval, da predlagana uporaba znižanih stopenj prispevkov za socialno varnost v conah 2, 3 in 4 zajema zelo širok obseg gospodarskih sektorjev in podjetij.
The notified measure replicated to a very large extent the former scheme of regionally differentiated and reduced rates of social security contributions, which was declared incompatible aid by the Authority [30].
Priglašeni ukrep je do zelo velike mere ponovil prejšnjo shemo znižanih prispevkov za socialno varnost in prispevkov, ki se razlikujejo po regijah, ki jo je Organ razglasil za nezdružljivo pomoč [30].
The main difference between the formerly assessed scheme and the measure currently notified is a reduction in the number of economic sectors that could benefit from reduced rates.
Glavna razlika med prej ocenjeno shemo in trenutno priglašenim ukrepom je znižanje števila gospodarskih sektorjev, ki so lahko upravičeni do znižanih stopenj.
The ECON report had prepared a list of sectors which were allegedly not affected by intra-EEA trade on the basis of the assessment of the competition interfaces.
Na podlagi ocene konkurenčnih vmesnikov je poročilo ECON pripravilo seznam sektorjev, na katere domnevno ni vplivala trgovina znotraj EGP.
The Authority expressed doubts in the opening decision with regard to the method followed in the ECON report for collecting data, which did not seem systematic.
V uvodni odločbi je Organ izrazil dvome o metodi zbiranja podatkov, uporabljeni v poročilu ECON, ker se ne zdi sistematična.
The Authority was concerned that the ECON report produced only an incomplete picture of the status quo and that there was no thorough analysis of the future situation.
Organ je izrazil skrb, da poročilo ECON prikazuje le nepopolno sliko nespremenjenega stanja in da ne vsebuje dovolj temeljite analize stanja v prihodnosti.
The Authority stressed its doubts as to whether the approach followed to determine whether there was intra-EEA trade effect in a given sector would comply with the requirements laid down in established case law regarding the understanding of the criterion ‘effect on trade’ within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.
Organ je poudaril svoje dvome o tem, ali bi bil uporabljeni pristop za ugotavljanje vpliva trgovine znotraj EGP v danem sektorju v skladu z zahtevami, ki so v uveljavljeni sodni praksi določena glede razumevanja merila „vpliva na trgovino“ v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP.
Referring to case law, the Authority recalled in particular that, contrary to the approach followed by the ECON report, the fact that aid is granted in respect of purely local activities or to undertakings operating at solely local level does not by itself preclude the possibility of an effect on trade.
Organ je s sklicevanjem na sodno prakso zlasti opozoril na to, da dejstvo, da se pomoč prizna za izključno lokalne dejavnosti in podjetjem, ki delujejo le na krajevni ravni, samo po sebi ne izključuje možnosti vpliva na trgovino, kar je v nasprotju s pristopom, uporabljenim v poročilu ECON.
Moreover, the Authority had doubts whether the notified measure provided the necessary mechanisms to guarantee the absence of effect on trade in all instances since it did not contain any general safeguard to ensure the necessary legal and economic certainty in its application concerning the effect on trade.
Poleg tega Organ dvomi o tem, ali je priglašeni ukrep v vseh primerih omogočil potrebne mehanizme za zagotavljanje odsotnosti vpliva na trgovino, saj njegova uporaba ne vsebuje nobenih splošnih zaščitnih ukrepov za zagotavljanje potrebne pravne in gospodarske varnosti v zvezi z vplivom na trgovino.
The Authority was concerned about the indefinite character of the measure which is unlimited in time and does not provide for a review clause of the criteria and conditions of application.
Organ je izrazil skrb glede nejasne narave ukrepa, ki je časovno neomejen ter ne vsebuje klavzule o pregledu ukrepov in pogojev uporabe.
The Authority decided to open the formal investigation procedure, amongst others, to facilitate the task for Norway of clarifying and better substantiating whether the application of the notified measure would not have any effect on trade.
Organ je sprejel odločitev o uvedbi formalnega postopka preiskave, da bi med drugim Norveški olajšal nalogo pojasnjevanja in boljše utemeljitve trditve, da uporaba priglašenega ukrepa ne bi imela nobenega vpliva na trgovino.
Reference is made to the following section for the comments submitted by the Norwegian authorities.
Naslednje poglavje se sklicuje na pripombe, ki so jih predložile norveške oblasti.
Comments by the Norwegian authorities
Pripombe norveških oblasti
By letter dated 12 November 2004, the Norwegian authorities submitted their comments to the Authority’s decision to open the formal investigation procedure.
Norveške oblasti so z dopisom z dne 12. novembra 2004 predložile svoje pripombe na odločbo Organa o uvedbi formalnega postopka preiskave.
As far as the content of the notification is concerned, the Norwegian authorities clarified that regarding the standard industrial classifications 52.120 (other retail in non-specialised stores), 52.420 (retail sale of clothing) and 52.443 (retail sale of furniture), the notification covered undertakings located in all three zones included in the measure.
O vsebini priglasitve so norveške oblasti pojasnile, da priglasitev glede na standardne industrijske klasifikacijske oznake 52.120 (druga trgovina na drobno v specializiranih prodajalnah), 52.420 (trgovina na drobno z oblačili) in 52.443 (trgovina na drobno s pohištvom) zajema podjetja iz vseh treh con, vključenih v ukrep.
Due to an inaccuracy, this was only indicated for undertakings in Zone 4.
Zaradi napake je bilo to navedeno le za podjetja iz cone 4.
Secondly, the Norwegian authorities explained that ‘some economic sectors in one zone were notified as not exposed to competition whereas the same sectors in other zones were not included in the list.
Norveške oblasti so nato pojasnile, da „nekateri gospodarski sektorji v eni coni niso bili priglašeni kot neizpostavljeni konkurenci, medtem ko isti sektorji v drugih conah niso bili vključeni v seznam.
[…] The reason for this was that the ECON report found that for some economic sectors there were no undertakings that would exceed the de minimis threshold within the relevant zone.
[…] Razlog za to je bil v ugotovitvi poročila ECON, da v nekaterih gospodarskih sektorjih ni bilo podjetij, ki bi presegla prag de minimis znotraj ustrezne cone.
[…] However, for future purposes, if the wage costs of such undertakings should lead to an exceeding of the de minimis threshold, these undertakings will be considered in the same way as undertakings falling under the relevant sector notified in other zones.’
[…] Vendar če bi v prihodnje stroški plač takšnih podjetij presegli prag de minimis, bodo ta obravnavana enako kot podjetja, ki spadajo pod ustrezni sektor, priglašen v drugih conah.“
Thirdly, the Norwegian authorities found that the line of arguments followed by the Authority in the decision to open the formal investigation procedure reflected a somewhat simplified understanding of the method of data collection used and the assessment done by ECON.
Norveške oblasti so ugotovile tudi, da argumenti, ki jim je Organ sledil pri sklepu o uvedbi formalnega postopka preiskave, kažejo nekoliko poenostavljeno razumevanje metode za zbiranje podatkov, ki jo je podjetje ECON uporabilo za izvedbo ocene.