natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The transparency requirements in the financial relations between public authorities and public undertakings and within undertakings granted special or exclusive rights or entrusted with the operation of a service of general economic interest are indicated in Directive 80/73/EEC [25].
Zahteve po preglednosti finančnih odnosov med javnimi oblastmi in javnimi podjetji ter v podjetjih, ki so jim bile podeljene posebne ali ekskluzivne pravice ali ki jim je bilo zaupano delovanje storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, so navedene v Direktivi 80/723/EGS [25].
The EFTA States have been required by Directive 80/723/EEC to take the measures necessary to ensure — in the case of any undertaking granted special or exclusive rights or entrusted with the operation of a service of general economic interest and receiving State aid in any form whatsoever and which carries out other activities, that is to say, non-public service activities — that: (a) the internal accounts corresponding to different activities, i. e. public service and non-public service activities, are separate; (b) all costs and revenues are correctly assigned or allocated on the basis of consistently applied and objectively justifiable cost accounting principles; and (c) the cost-accounting principles according to which separate accounts are maintained are clearly established.
Direktiva 80/723/EGS zahteva od držav EFTE, da sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev (pri podjetju, ki so mu bile podeljene posebne ali ekskluzivne pravice oziroma ki mu je bilo zaupano delovanje storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena in ki prejema državno pomoč v kakršni koli obliki in ki izvaja druge dejavnosti, to je dejavnosti nejavne storitve), da: (a) ima ločene notranje račune, ki ustrezajo različnim dejavnostim, tj. dejavnostim javnih storitev in nejavnih storitev; (b) se vsi stroški in prihodki pravilno navedejo ali razmejijo na podlagi dosledno uporabljanih in objektivno opravičljivih načel stroškovnega knjigovodstva in (c) se jasno določijo načela stroškovnega knjigovodstva, po katerih se vodijo ločeni računi.
The general transparency requirements apply also to broadcasters as indicated in the fifth recital of Directive 2000/52/EC [26].
Splošne zahteve po preglednosti se uporabljajo tudi za radiodifuzne organizacije, kakor je navedeno v peti uvodni izjavi Direktive 2000/52/ES [26].
The new requirements apply to public service broadcasters, in so far as they are beneficiaries of State aid and they are entrusted with the operation of a service of general economic interest, for which the State aid was not fixed for an appropriate period following an open, transparent and non-discriminatory procedure.
Nove zahteve veljajo za javne radiodifuzne organizacije, če so prejemnice državne pomoči in če jim je zaupano delovanje storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, za katero ni bila določena državna pomoč za ustrezno obdobje po odprtem, preglednem in nerazlikovalnem postopku.
The obligation of separation of accounts does not apply to public service broadcasters whose activities are limited to the provision of services of general economic interest and which do not operate activities outside the scope of those services.
Obveznost ločevanja računov ne velja za javne radiodifuzne organizacije, katerih dejavnosti so omejene na izvajanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena in ki ne izvajajo dejavnosti zunaj obsega navedenih storitev.
In the broadcasting sector, the separation of accounts does not pose a particular problem on the revenue side, but may not be straightforward or, indeed, feasible on the cost side.
V radiodifuznem sektorju ločevanje računov na strani prihodkov ni posebna težava, na strani stroškov pa takšno ločevanje morda ne bo enostavno ali celo ne bo izvedljivo.
This is due to the fact that, in the broadcasting sector, EFTA States may consider the whole programming of the broadcasters as covered by the public service remit, while at the same time allowing for its commercial exploitation.
Države EFTE namreč lahko v radiodifuznem sektorju celotne programske vsebine radiodifuznih hiš obravnavajo kot del, zajet v odgovornost javne storitve, medtem ko lahko hkrati dovolijo njihovo komercialno izkoriščanje.
In other words, different activities share the same input to a large extent.
Povedano drugače, različne dejavnosti si v veliki meri delijo isti vložek.
For these reasons, the Authority considers that, on the revenue side, broadcasting operators should give a detailed account of the sources and amount of all income accruing from the performance of non-public service activities.
Zato Nadzorni organ meni, da bi morale radiodifuzne organizacije na strani prihodkov podrobno upoštevati vire in znesek celotnega dohodka, nastalega iz izvajanja dejavnosti nejavnih storitev.
On the expenditure side, costs specific to the non-public service activity should be clearly identified.
Na strani odhodkov je treba jasno opredeliti stroške, ki so značilni za dejavnost nejavne storitve.
In addition, whenever the same resources — personnel, equipment, fixed installation, etc. — are used to perform both public service and non-public service tasks, their costs should be allocated on the basis of the difference in the firm's total costs with and without non-public service activities [27].
Poleg tega je treba, kadar se za izvajanje nalog javne in nejavne storitve uporabljajo isti viri (osebje, oprema, fiksna napeljava itd.), njihove stroške razmejiti na podlagi razlike v skupnih stroških podjetja z dejavnostmi nejavne storitve in brez njih [27].
The above implies that, contrary to the approach generally adopted in other utilities sectors, costs that are entirely attributable to public service activities, while benefiting also commercial activities, need not be apportioned between the two and can be entirely allocated to public service.
Iz zgornjega izhaja, da, v nasprotju s splošno sprejetim pristopom v drugih sektorjih javnih služb, stroškov, ki jih je mogoče v celoti pripisati dejavnostim javne storitve, ob koristih tudi iz drugih komercialnih dejavnosti, ni treba razdeliti med obe dejavnosti in jih je mogoče v celoti pripisati javni storitvi.
This could be the case, for example, with the production costs of a programme which is shown as part of the public service remit but is also sold to other broadcasters.
Zgled tega bi lahko bili na primer produkcijski stroški programa, ki je prikazan kot del odgovornosti javne storitve, a se prodaja tudi drugim radiodifuznim organizacijam.
The main example, however, would be that of the number of viewers, which is generated both to fulfil the public service remit and to sell advertising space.
Glavni primer pa je vsekakor število gledalcev, ki se ustvari tako zaradi uresničevanja odgovornosti javne storitve kot zaradi prodaje oglaševalskega prostora.
It is considered that a full distribution of these costs between the two activities risks being arbitrary and not meaningful.
Prevladuje mnenje, da je celotna razdelitev teh stroškov med obe dejavnosti lahko že na meji samovolje in nesmisla.
However, cost allocation from the point of view of transparency of accounts should not be confused with cost recovery in the definition of pricing policies.
Kljub temu pa razporeditve stroškov z vidika preglednosti računov ne bi smeli zamenjevati s pokrivanjem stroškov pri opredelitvi cenovnih politik.
The latter issue is addressed in section 24 C.6.3.3.(2).
Slednje vprašanje je obravnavano v spodnjem oddelku 24C.6.3.3(2).
In carrying out the proportionality test, the Authority starts from the consideration that the State funding is normally necessary for the undertaking to carry out its public service tasks.
Pri izvedbi preskusa sorazmernosti izhaja Nadzorni organ iz predpostavke, da država običajno financira podjetje za opravljanje njegovih nalog iz javne storitve.
However, in order to satisfy this test, it is necessary that the State aid does not exceed the net costs of the public service mission, also taking into account other direct or indirect revenues derived from the public service mission.
Vendar za izpolnitev zahtev tega preskusa državna pomoč ne sme preseči neto stroškov poslanstva javne storitve, ob hkratnem upoštevanju drugih neposrednih ali posrednih prihodkov, ki izhajajo iz poslanstva javne storitve.
For this reason, the net benefit that non-public service activities derive from the public service activity will be taken into account in assessing the proportionality of the aid.
Zato bo pri oceni sorazmernosti pomoči upoštevan neto prejemek, ki ga imajo dejavnosti nejavne storitve iz dejavnosti javne storitve.
On the other hand, there might be market distortions which are not necessary for the fulfilment of the public service mission.
Po drugi strani lahko pride do izkrivljanj trga, ki niso potrebna za izpolnitev poslanstva javne storitve.
For example, a public service broadcaster, in so far as lower revenues are covered by the State aid, might be tempted to depress the prices of advertising or other non-public service activities on the market, so as to reduce the revenue of competitors.
Če nižje prihodke na primer pokriva državna pomoč, bi javno radiodifuzno organizacijo morda zamikalo, da zniža cene oglaševanja ali drugih dejavnosti nejavne storitve na trgu, da bi zmanjšala dohodek tekmecev.
Such conduct, if demonstrated, could not be considered as intrinsic to the public service mission attributed to the broadcaster.
Morebitnega takšnega ravnanja ne bi bilo mogoče obravnavati kot značilnega za poslanstvo javne storitve, pripisane radiodifuzni organizaciji.
Whenever a public service broadcaster undercuts prices in non-public service activities below what is necessary to recover the stand-alone costs that an efficient commercial operator in a similar situation would normally have to recover, such practice would indicate the presence of overcompensation of public service obligations.
Kadar javna radiodifuzna organizacija zniža cene dejavnosti nejavne storitve pod mejo, potrebno za povračilo neodvisnih stroškov, ki bi si jih običajno moral povrniti učinkovit komercialni operater v podobnem položaju, bi to pomenilo navzočnost presežne kompenzacije za obveznosti javne storitve.
This would in any event affect trading conditions and competition in the European Economic Area to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest.
To bi vsekakor toliko vplivalo na trgovinske pogoje in konkurenco v Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, da bi bilo v nasprotju s skupnim interesom.
Accordingly, in carrying out the proportionality test, the Authority will consider whether or not any distortion of competition arising from the aid can be justified in terms of the need to perform the public service as defined by the EFTA State and to provide for its funding.
Temu primerno bo Nadzorni organ pri izvajanju preskusa sorazmernosti preučil, ali je kakršno koli izkrivljanje konkurence, ki izhaja iz pomoči, mogoče opravičiti s potrebo po izvajanju javne storitve, kakor je opredeljena v državi EFTE, in z zagotovitvijo njenega financiranja.
When necessary the Authority will also take action in light of other provisions of the EEA Agreement.
Po potrebi bo Nadzorni organ ukrepal tudi glede na druge določbe Sporazuma EGP.
The analysis of the effects of State aid on competition and development of trade will inevitably have to be based on the specific characteristics of each situation.
Analiza učinkov državne pomoči na konkurenco in razvoj trgovine bo morala nujno temeljiti na posebnih značilnostih posamičnega položaja.
The actual competitive structure and other characteristics of each of the markets cannot be described in the present communication, as they are generally quite different from each other.
V tem sporočilu ni mogoče opisati dejanske konkurenčne strukture in drugih značilnosti posameznih trgov, saj se na splošno med seboj precej razlikujejo.
For the same reason, these Guidelines cannot ex ante define the conditions under which the prices of the public service broadcasters are in line with the principles explained in section 24.C.6.3.3. (2).
Zato tudi te smernice ne morejo predhodno določiti pogojev, v katerih so cene javnih radiodifuznih organizacij skladne z načeli, razloženimi v oddelku 24.C.6.3.3(2).
Therefore the assessment under Article 59(2) of the EEA Agreement of the compatibility of State aid to public broadcasters can finally only be made on a case-by-case basis, according to the Authority’s practice.
Zato se dokončna ocena v skladu s členom 59(2) Sporazuma EGP o skladnosti državne pomoči za javne radiodifuzne organizacije lahko izdela samo za posamične primere, v skladu s prakso Nadzornega organa.
In its assessment, the Authority will take into account the fact that, to the extent that State aid is necessary to carry out the public service obligation, the system as a whole might also have the positive effect of maintaining an alternative source of supply in some relevant markets [28].
Nadzorni organ bo v svoji oceni upošteval, da lahko do obsega, v katerem je državna pomoč potrebna za uresničevanje obveznosti javne storitve, sistem kot celota tudi pozitivno vpliva na ohranjanje alternativnega vira ponudbe na nekaterih pomembnih trgih [28].
However, this effect has to be balanced against possible negative effects of the aid, such as preventing other operators from entering these markets, thereby allowing a more oligopolistic market structure, or leading to possible anti-competitive behaviour of public service operators in the relevant markets.
Vendar pa je treba ta učinek ohranjati v ravnotežju z možnimi negativnimi učinki pomoči, kot je preprečevanje drugim operaterjem, da bi vstopili na te trge, s čimer bi se omogočila bolj oligopolna struktura trga, ali povzročanje morebitnega protikonkurenčnega vedenja javnih operaterjev na ustreznih trgih.
The Authority will also take into account the difficulty some EFTA States may have to collect the necessary funds, if costs per inhabitant of the public service are, ceteris paribus, higher [29].
Nadzorni organ bo upošteval tudi težavo, ki jo bodo nekatere države EFTE morda imele pri zbiranju potrebnih sredstev, če bodo stroški javne storitve na prebivalca v sicer nespremenjenem položaju višji [29].
This chapter is to a large extent based on the Commission Communication on the application of the State aid rules to public service broadcasting, OJ C 320, 15.11.2001, p. 5.
To poglavje močno temelji na Sporočilu Komisije o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za javno radiodifuzijo, UL C 320, 15.11.2001, str. 5.
OJ C 30, 5.2.1999, p. 1; incorporated into the EEA Agreement in Annex X, point 4, as an act which the Contracting Parties shall take note of, by Decision No 118/1999, OJ L 325, 21.12.2000, p. 33 and EEA Supplement No 60, 21.12.2000, p. 423 (Icelandic) and p. 424 (Norwegian), e.i.f. 1.10.1999.
UL C 30, 5.2.1999, str. 1; vključeno v Sporazum EGP v točki 4 Priloge X kot akt, s katerim se morajo seznaniti pogodbenice, z Odločbo št. 118/1999, UL L 325, 21.12.2000, str. 33, in dodatkom EGP št. 60, 21.12.2000, str. 423 (islandsko) in str. 424 (norveško), začetek veljavnosti 1.10.1999.
‘The digital age of European audiovisual policy.
„The digital age of European audiovisual policy.
Report from the EC high-level group on audiovisual policy’, 1998.
Report from the EC high-level group on audiovisual policy“, 1998. (Digitalna doba evropske avdiovizualne politike. Poročilo skupine ES na visoki ravni za avdiovizualno politiko.)
For the purpose of the present guidelines, the term ‘public service’ corresponds with the term ‘services of general economic interest’ used in Article 59(2) of the EEA Agreement.
V veljavnih smernicah izraz „javna storitev“ ustreza izrazu „storitve splošnega gospodarska interesa“, uporabljenemu v členu 59(2) Sporazuma EGP.
Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty corresponds to Article 59(2) of the EEA Agreement.
Člen 86(2) Pogodbe ES ustreza členu 59(2) Sporazuma EGP.
Case T-69/89 Radio Telefis Eireann v Commission [1991] ECR II 485, paragraph 82; Case 155/73 Giuseppe Sacchi [1974] ECR 409, paragraph 15.
Primer T-69/89 Radio Telefis Eireann proti Komisiji [1991] PSES II 485, odstavek 82; primer 155/73 Giuseppe Sacchi [1974] PSES 409, odstavek 15.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision 32/02/COL of 20.2.2002 concerning film production and film related activities in Norway.
Odločba Nadzornega organa EFTA št. 32/02/COL z dne 20.2.2002 v zvezi s filmsko produkcijo in s filmom povezanimi dejavnostmi na Norveškem. Nadaljnje podrobnosti so na voljo v oddelku 24C.
Further details can be seen in section 24.C.5(2) of these Guidelines.
5(2) teh smernic.
Joint Committee Decision No 82/19999, OJ L 296, 23.11.2000, p. 39 and EEA Supplement No 54, 23.11.2000, p. 99 (Icelandic) and Del. 2, p. 69 (Norwegian) e.i.f. 1.7.2000.
Odločba skupnega odbora EGP št. 82/1999, UL L 296, 23.11.2000, str. 39, in dodatek EGP št. 54, 23.11.2000, str. 99 (islandsko) in del 2, str. 69 (norveško), začetek veljavnosti 1.7.2000.
OJ L 195, 29.7.1980, p. 35, incorporated into the EEA Agreement in Annex XV thereto.
UL L 195, 29.7.1980, str. 35; vključeno v Sporazum EGP v Prilogi XV k Sporazumu.
OJ L 66, 8.3.2001, p. 48 and EEA Supplement No 12, 8.3.2001, p. 6, e.i.f 1.6.2002.
UL L 66, 8.3.2001, str. 48, in dodatek EGP št. 12, 8.3.2001, str. 6, začetek veljavnosti 1.6.2002.
Chapter 19 of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines is based on Bulletin EC 9-1984 on the Application of [ex] Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty to public authorities’ holdings.
Poglavje 19 Smernic Nadzornega organa za državno pomoč temelji na Biltenu ES 9-1984 o uporabi [nekdanjih] členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe EGS za holdinge javnih organov.
Chapter 20 corresponds to Commission Communication to the Member States on the application of [ex] Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty (now Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty) and of Article 5 of Commission Directive 80/723/EEC to public undertakings in the manufacturing sector, OJ C 307, 13.11.1993, p. 3.
Poglavje 20 ustreza Sporočilu Komisije državam članicam o uporabi [nekdanjih] členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe EGS (zdaj člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES) in člena 5 Direktive Komisije 80/723/EGS za javna podjetja v proizvodnem sektorju, UL C 307, 13.11.1993, str. 3.
See EC Commission Decisions NN 88/98 ‘Financing of a 24/hour advertising free news channel with licence fee by the BBC’, OJ C 78, 18.3.2000, p. 6 and aid NN 70/98, ‘State aid to public broadcasting channels Kinderkanal and Phoenix’, OJ C 238, 21.8.1999, p. 3.
Glej odločbi Komisije ES NN 88/98 „Financiranje 24-urnega BBC-jevega informativnega kanala brez oglaševanja z licenčnino“, UL C 78, 18.3.2000, str. 6, in NN 70/98, „Državna pomoč javnima radiodifuznima kanaloma Kinderkanal in Phoenix“, UL C 238, 21.8.1999, str. 3.
Cases 730/79 Philip Morris Holland v Commission [1980] ECR 2671, paragraph 11; C-303/88 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 27; C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 33.
Primeri 730/79 Philip Morris Holland proti Komisiji [1980] PSES 2671, odstavek 11; C-303/88 Italija proti Komisiji [1991] PSES I-1433, odstavek 27; C-156/98 Nemčija proti Komisiji [2000] PSES I-6857, odstavek 33.
Cases T-106/95 FFSA and Others v Commission [1997] ECR II-229; T-46/97 SIC v Commission [2000] ECR II-2125 and C-332/98 France v Commission [2000] ECR I-4833.
Primeri T-106/95 FFSA in drugi proti Komisiji [1997] PSES II-229; T-46/97 SIC proti Komisiji [2000] PSES II-2125 in C-332/98 Francija proti Komisiji [2000] PSES I-4833.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH, Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747, paragraph 89 et seq.
Primer C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH, Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] PSES I-7747, odstavek 89 in naslednji.
Corresponds to Article 88(1) of the EC Treaty.
Ustreza členu 88(1) Pogodbe ES.
Case C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit SA v Office National du Ducroire and the Belgian State [1994] ECR I-3829.
Primer C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit SA proti Office National du Ducroire in državi Belgiji [1994] PSES I-3829.
Article 86 of the EC Treaty corresponds to Article 59 of the EEA Agreement.
Člen 86 Pogodbe ES ustreza členu 59 Sporazuma EGP.
Commission Decision C62/1999, RAI, paragraph 99 and C85/2001, RTP, paragraph 158.
Odločba Komisije C62/1999, RAI, odstavek 99, in C85/2001, RTP, odstavek 158.
See footnote 12.
Glej sprotno opombo 12.
See footnote 13 and 14.
Glej sprotni opombi 13 in 14.
This implies reference to the hypothetical situation in which the non-public service activities were to be discontinued: the costs that would be so avoided represent the amount of common costs to be allocated to non-public service activities.
To pomeni sklicevanje na hipotetični položaj, v katerem se dejavnosti nejavne storitve opustijo: stroški, ki bi se jim tako izognili, so enaki znesku skupnih stroškov, ki se dodelijo dejavnostim nejavne storitve.
This does not mean that State aid can be justified as a tool, which increases supply and competition in a market.
To ne pomeni, da je mogoče državno pomoč opravičiti kot orodje, ki povečuje ponudbo in konkurenco na trgu.
State aid which allows an operator to stay in the market in spite of its recurrent losses causes a major distortion of competition, as it leads in the long run to higher inefficiency, smaller supply and higher prices for consumers.
Državna pomoč, ki operaterju omogoča, da ostane na trgu kljub svojim ponavljajočim se izgubam, povzroča veliko izkrivljanje konkurence, saj dolgoročno vodi k večji neučinkovitosti, manjši ponudbi in višjim cenam za uporabnike.
Lifting legal and economic barriers to entry, ensuring an effective anti-trust policy and promoting pluralism are more effective instruments in this respect.
V zvezi s tem so učinkovitejši instrumenti dviganje pravnih in gospodarskih ovir za vstop, zagotavljanje učinkovite antitrustovske politike in spodbujanje pluralizma.
Natural monopolies are normally subject to regulation.
Naravni monopoli so navadno regulirani.
Similar difficulties may also be encountered when public service broadcasting is addressed to linguistic minorities or to local needs.
Podobne težave lahko nastanejo tudi, ko se javna radiodifuzija nameni za jezikovne manjšine in lokalne potrebe.
No 193/04/COL
št. 193/04/COL
on notifications, time limits and consultations provided for in Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services
o priglasitvah, rokih in posvetovanjih, predvidenih v členu 7 Direktive 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [1],
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [1],
Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, and in particular Article 5(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med državami EFTE o ustanovitvi Nadzornega organa in Sodišča ter zlasti člena 5(2)(b) Sporazuma,
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 5cl of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement and as adapted to the Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto and by the sectoral adaptations contained in Annex XI to that Agreement (Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communication networks and services), and in particular Article 19(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 5cl Priloge XI k Sporazumu EGP, kakor je bil prilagojen Sporazumu s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu in s sektorskimi prilagoditvami iz Priloge XI k navedenemu sporazumu (Direktiva 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve) ter zlasti člena 19(1) akta,