natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ex ante regulation imposed at the wholesale level should be considered sufficient to tackle potential competition problems on the related downstream market(s).
Predhodno urejanje na veleprodajni ravni bi bilo treba obravnavati kot zadostno za odpravo morebitnih težav v zvezi s konkurenco na povezanih podrejenih trgih.
A downstream market should only be subject to ex ante regulation if competition on that market still exhibits SMP despite the presence of ex ante regulation on the related upstream wholesale market(s).
Podrejeni trg bi bilo treba predhodno urediti le, če konkurenca na tem trgu še vedno kaže pomembno tržno moč kljub prisotnosti predhodne ureditve na povezanih veleprodajnih trgih v zgornjem delu prodajne verige.
Given the advances in competition that have been achieved thanks to regulation, this Recommendation identifies only relevant markets at the wholesale level.
Glede na napredek na področju konkurence, ki je bil dosežen zaradi ureditve, to priporočilo opredeljuje le upoštevne trge na veleprodajni ravni.
It is believed that their regulation can address a lack of effective competition at the wholesale level, which in turn is the cause of identified market failures in the related retail markets.
Prevladuje mnenje, da lahko njihova ureditev odpravi pomanjkanje učinkovite konkurence na veleprodajni ravni, ki povzroča ugotovljene tržne pomanjkljivosti na povezanih maloprodajnih trgih.
Should an NRA nonetheless demonstrate that wholesale interventions have been unsuccessful, the relevant retail market may be susceptible to ex ante regulation provided that the NRA has found that the three-criteria test prescribed in this Recommendation is met.
Če nacionalni regulativni organ kljub temu dokaže, da so bili veleprodajni ukrepi neuspešni, je lahko zadevni maloprodajni trg predmet predhodnega urejanja, če nacionalni regulativni organ ugotovi, da je test treh meril iz tega priporočila opravljen.
The markets listed in the Annex have been identified on the basis of the above-mentioned three cumulative criteria.
Trgi iz Priloge so bili opredeljeni na podlagi navedenih treh kumulativnih meril.
The NRAs should start from a presumption that, in these markets, the three criteria are met.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali izhajati iz domneve, da so na teh trgih izpolnjena ta tri merila.
If, however, an NRA concludes that, absent regulation at the wholesale level, the retail market(s) as defined display(s) sustainable competition, it should also conclude that ex ante regulation is no longer needed at the wholesale level.
Če pa nacionalni regulativni organ ugotovi, da na opredeljenih maloprodajnih trgih brez ureditve na veleprodajni ravni prevladuje trajnostna konkurenca, bi moral skleniti, da predhodna ureditev na veleprodajni ravni ni več potrebna.
For the markets listed in the Annex, an NRA may still consider it appropriate, on the basis of specific national circumstances, to conduct its own three-criteria test.
Za trge iz Priloge lahko nacionalni regulativni organ še vedno šteje za ustrezno, da na podlagi posebnih razmer v državi izvede svoj test treh meril.
An NRA may conclude that the three-criteria test is or is not met in the national circumstances.
Nacionalni regulativni organ lahko sklene, da je ta test treh meril glede na razmere v državi opravljen ali da ni opravljen.
If the three-criteria test is not met for a specific market listed in the Recommendation, the NRA should not impose regulatory obligations on that market.
Če test treh meril ni opravljen za določen trg iz Priporočila, nacionalni regulativni organ na tem trgu ne bi smel uvesti regulativnih obveznosti.
NRAs may identify other markets than those listed in this Recommendation and apply the three-criteria test.
Nacionalni regulativni organi lahko opredelijo druge trge, kot so navedeni v tem priporočilu, in uporabijo test treh meril.
In particular, if NRAs, having concluded that a retail market is not effectively competitive absent ex ante regulation, intend to regulate the corresponding wholesale market(s), and this/these market(s) is/are not listed in the Recommendation, they should always conduct the three-criteria test.
Zlasti je treba poudariti, da bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi vedno izvesti test treh meril, če nameravajo po ugotovitvi, da maloprodajni trg ni učinkovito konkurenčen brez predhodne ureditve, urediti ustrezne veleprodajne trge, ti trgi pa niso navedeni v Priporočilu.
In such a case, the wholesale market to be analysed first is the one that is most upstream from the retail market in question in the vertical supply chain.
V tem primeru je treba najprej analizirati veleprodajni trg, ki je v primerjavi z zadevnim maloprodajnim trgom najvišje v vertikalni prodajni verigi.
An NRA should conduct a gradual analysis of the markets that are situated downstream from a regulated upstream input, to determine whether they would be effectively competitive in the presence of regulation upstream, until it reaches the retail market(s).
Nacionalni regulativni organ bi moral izvesti postopno analizo trgov, ki so podrejeni reguliranim vložkom na predhodnem trgu, da bi ugotovil, ali bi bili učinkovito konkurenčni ob ureditvi predhodnih trgov, dokler ne doseže maloprodajnih trgov.
NRAs should also apply the three-criteria test to those markets listed in the Annex to the Authority's Recommendation of 14 July 2004 on relevant markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation [9] and to the Authority's 2008 Recommendation which are no longer listed in the Annex to this Recommendation if they are currently regulated in the light of national circumstances, in order to assess whether, on the basis of such national circumstances, such markets are still susceptible to ex ante regulation.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali uporabiti test treh meril tudi za trge, ki so navedeni v Prilogi k priporočilu Nadzornega organa z dne 14. julija 2004 o upoštevnih trgih v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij, ki so predmet predhodnega urejanja [9], in k priporočilu Nadzornega organa iz leta 2008, ki niso več navedeni v Prilogi k temu priporočilu, če so urejeni glede na razmere v državi, da bi ocenili, ali so lahko ti trgi na podlagi takih razmer v državi še vedno predmet predhodnega urejanja.
Newly-emerging markets should not be subject to inappropriate ex ante regulatory obligations, even if there is a first-mover advantage, in accordance with the Framework Directive.
Na novonastajajočih trgih se v skladu z okvirno direktivo ne bi smele uvesti neprimerne predhodne regulativne obveznosti, tudi če ima prvi na trgu prednost.
Newly-emerging markets are considered to comprise products or services where, due to their novelty, it is very difficult to predict demand conditions or market entry and supply conditions, and consequently difficult to apply the three-criteria test.
Za novonastajajoče trge se šteje, da obsegajo proizvode ali storitve, pri katerih je zaradi njihovih novosti zelo težko predvideti pogoje povpraševanja ali vstopa na trg in ponudbene pogoje, zato je tudi težko uporabiti test treh meril.
The purpose of not subjecting newly-emerging markets to inappropriate ex ante regulatory obligations is to promote innovation as required by Article 8 of the Framework Directive; at the same time, foreclosure of such markets by the leading undertaking should be prevented, as also indicated in the Authority's guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of SMP [10].
Namen tega, da se na novonastajajočih trgih ne smejo uvesti neprimerne predhodne regulativne obveznosti, je spodbujati inovacije, kot zahteva člen 8 okvirne direktive, hkrati pa bi bilo treba preprečiti, da bi vodilno podjetje zaseglo takšne trge, kot je navedeno tudi v smernicah Nadzornega organa za tržno analizo in oceno pomembne tržne moči [10].
Incremental upgrades to existing network infrastructure rarely lead to a new or emerging market.
Primarne nadgradnje obstoječe omrežne infrastrukture redko privedejo do novega ali nastajajočega trga.
The lack of substitutability of a product has to be established from both demand- and supply-side perspectives before it can be concluded that it is not part of an already existing market.
Pomanjkanje zamenljivosti proizvoda se določi z vidika povpraševanja in ponudbe, preden je mogoče zaključiti, da ni del že obstoječega trga.
The emergence of new retail services may give rise to a new derived wholesale market to the extent that such retail services cannot be provided using existing wholesale products.
Pojav novih storitev na maloprodajni ravni lahko povzroči nastanek novega veleprodajnega trga v takšnem obsegu, da teh storitev na maloprodajni ravni ni mogoče zagotoviti z obstoječimi veleprodajnimi proizvodi.
NRAs shall make accessible to the Authority and to the other EEA NRAs the results of the application of the three-criteria test carried out in accordance with this Recommendation and falling within the scope of Article 7(3) of the Framework Directive.
Nacionalni regulativni organi rezultate testa treh meril, ki je bil izveden v skladu s tem priporočilom in ki spada na področje uporabe člena 7(3) okvirne direktive, zagotovijo Nadzornemu organu in drugim nacionalnim regulativnim organom EGP.
Failure to notify a draft measure which affects trade between the EFTA States as described in recital 38 of the Framework Directive may result in infringement proceedings being taken against the EFTA State concerned.
Če osnutek ukrepa, ki vpliva na trgovino med državami Efte, kakor je opisano v uvodni izjavi 38 okvirne direktive, ni priglašen, se lahko proti zadevni državi Efte sproži postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev.
The markets listed in the Annex to the Recommendation no longer include two markets that were listed in the Authority's 2008 Recommendation (markets 1 and 2) as they no longer fulfil the three-criteria test.
Trgi, ki so navedeni v Prilogi k Priporočilu, ne vključujejo več dveh trgov, ki sta bila navedena v priporočilu Nadzornega organa iz leta 2008 (trga 1 in 2), saj ne opravita več testa treh meril.
As there may be a degree of variation across the EFTA States in the pace of the expected or foreseeable market developments which underlie this finding at EEA level, specific national circumstances may justify that an NRA could find that market 1 of the Authority's 2008 Recommendation or other retail markets related to market 2 of the Authority's 2008 Recommendation are not yet effectively competitive from a forward-looking perspective absent appropriate and proportionate wholesale remedies.
Ker se lahko hitrost pričakovanega ali predvidenega razvoja trga v državah Efte, na kateri temelji ta ugotovitev na ravni EGP, nekoliko razlikuje, je mogoče na podlagi posebnih razmer v državi utemeljiti ugotovitev nacionalnega regulativnega organa, da trg 1 iz priporočila Nadzornega organa iz leta 2008 ali drugi maloprodajni trgi, povezani s trgom 2 iz priporočila Nadzornega organa iz leta 2008, glede na pričakovani prihodnji razvoj še niso učinkovito konkurenčni brez ustreznih in sorazmernih veleprodajnih korektivnih ukrepov.
NRAs could thus justify continuing ex ante regulatory intervention at wholesale level provided that the three-criteria test is satisfied in the national circumstances for the subsequent review period.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi lahko torej utemeljili nadaljnje predhodno regulativno posredovanje na veleprodajni ravni, če je test treh meril opravljen glede na razmere v državi za naslednje obdobje pregleda.
The remaining markets of the Authority's 2008 Recommendation still warrant ex ante regulation, although the boundaries of markets 4, 5 and 6 of the Authority's 2008 Recommendation are redefined.
Za preostale trge iz priporočila Nadzornega organa iz leta 2008 je še vedno upravičeno predhodno urejanje, čeprav so na novo opredeljene meje trgov 4, 5 in 6 iz zadevnega priporočila.
NRAs take into account their national circumstances when delineating these markets.
Nacionalni regulativni organi pri opredelitvi teh trgov upoštevajo razmere v državi.
This Recommendation has been subject to a public consultation and consultation with NRAs and other national authorities in the EFTA States [11].
O tem priporočilu je bilo opravljeno javno posvetovanje ter posvetovanje z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in drugimi nacionalnimi organi držav Efte [11] –
In defining relevant markets appropriate to national circumstances in accordance with Article 15(3) of the Framework Directive, NRAs should analyse the product and service markets identified in the Annex.
Pri opredelitvi upoštevnih trgov glede na razmere v državi v skladu s členom 15(3) okvirne direktive bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi analizirati trge proizvodov in storitev, opredeljene v Prilogi.
When identifying markets other than those set out in the Annex, NRAs should demonstrate, and the Authority will verify, that the following three criteria are cumulatively met:
Pri opredelitvi drugih trgov, kot so navedeni v Prilogi, bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi dokazati, Nadzorni organ pa preveriti, da so kumulativno izpolnjena naslednja tri merila:
the presence of high and non-transitory structural, legal or regulatory barriers to entry;
prisotnost visokih in stalnih strukturnih, pravnih ali regulativnih ovir za vstop na trg;
a market structure which does not tend towards effective competition within the relevant time horizon, having regard to the state of infrastructure-based and other competition behind the barriers to entry;
tržna struktura, ki se ob upoštevanju stanja infrastrukturne in druge konkurence za ovirami za vstop na trg ne nagiba k učinkoviti konkurenci v ustreznem časovnem obdobju;
competition law alone is insufficient to adequately address the identified market failure(s).
samo konkurenčno pravo ne zadostuje za primerno odpravljanje ugotovljenih tržnih pomanjkljivosti.
When considering that any of the markets set out in the Annex is not susceptible to ex ante regulation in the specific national circumstances, NRAs should demonstrate, and the Authority will verify, that at least one of the three criteria set out in point 2 is not met.
Pri proučevanju, ali kateri od trgov iz Priloge ne more biti predmet predhodnega urejanja v posebnih razmerah v državi, bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi dokazati, Nadzorni organ pa preveriti, da ni izpolnjeno najmanj eno od treh meril iz točke 2.
NRAs should consider all relevant competitive constraints, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali upoštevati vse ustrezne konkurenčne omejitve ne glede na to, ali take omejitve domnevno izhajajo iz elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev ali drugih vrst storitev ali programov, ki so primerljivi z vidika končnega uporabnika.
This Recommendation is without prejudice to market definitions, results of market analyses and regulatory obligations adopted by NRAs in accordance with Articles 15(3) and 16 of the Framework Directive prior to the date of adoption of this Recommendation.
To priporočilo ne posega v opredelitve trgov, rezultate tržnih analiz in regulativne obveznosti, ki so jih nacionalni regulativni organi sprejeli v skladu s členom 15(3) in členom 16 okvirne direktive pred sprejetjem tega priporočila.
This Recommendation is addressed to the EFTA States.
To priporočilo je naslovljeno na države Efte.
OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 33.
UL L 108, 24.4.2002, str. 33.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Recommendation of 5 November 2008 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with the Act referred to at point 5cl of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services), as adapted by Protocol 1 thereto and by the sectoral adaptions contained in Annex XI to that Agreement (OJ C 156, 9.7.2009, p. 18 and EEA Supplement No 36, 9.7.2009, p. 1).
Priporočilo Nadzornega organa Efte z dne 5. novembra 2008 o upoštevnih trgih proizvodov in storitev v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij, ki so lahko predmet predhodnega urejanja v skladu z aktom iz točke 5cl Priloge XI k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve), kakor je bil prilagojen s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu in s sektorskimi prilagoditvami iz Priloge XI k navedenemu sporazumu (UL C 156, 9.7.2009, str. 18, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 36, 9.7.2009, str. 1).
The EFTA Surveillance Authority's Guidelines of 14 July 2004 on market analysis and the assessment of significant market power under the regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services referred to in Annex XI of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (OJ C 101, 27.4.2006, p. 1 and EEA Supplement No 21, 27.4.2006, p. 1), hereinafter referred to as the ‘Authority's guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of SMP’.
Smernice Nadzornega organa EFTA z dne 14. julija 2004 za tržno analizo in oceno pomembne tržne moči v skladu z regulativnim okvirom za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve iz Priloge XI k Sporazumu o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (UL C 101, 27.4.2006, str. 1, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 21, 27.4.2006, str. 1), v nadaljnjem besedilu: smernice Nadzornega organa za tržno analizo in oceno pomembne tržne moči.
Commission Recommendation 2014/710/EU of 9 October 2014 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (OJ L 295, 11.10.2014, p.
Priporočilo Komisije 2014/710/EU z dne 9. oktobra 2014 o upoštevnih trgih proizvodov in storitev v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij, ki so lahko predmet predhodnega urejanja v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/21/ES o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (UL L 295, 11.10.2014, str. 79).
79).
Četrta uvodna izjava iz preambule Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru.
4th consideration in the Preamble to the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
Točka 20 smernic Nadzornega organa za tržno analizo in oceno pomembne tržne moči.
Point 20 of the Authority's Guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of SMP.
Glej sprotno opombo 4.
See footnote 4 above.
Kot so na primer povrhnje (OTT) storitve, ki se sicer ne obravnavajo kot neposredna nadomestila za storitve, ki jih zagotavljajo izvajalci elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev, vendar bo tehnološki razvoj verjetno prispeval k njihovemu stalnem razširjanju v prihodnjih letih.
Such as, for instance, over-the-top (‘OTT’) services which, although today may not be considered as direct substitutes to services provided by electronic communications service providers, technological developments are likely to result in their continuous expansion in the coming years.
Priporočilo Nadzornega organa Efte z dne 14. julija 2004 o upoštevnih trgih proizvodov in storitev v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij, ki so lahko predmet predhodnega urejanja v skladu z aktom iz točke 5cl Priloge XI k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve), kakor je bilo vključeno v Sporazum o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, sprejeto z Odločbo št. 194/04/COL.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Recommendation of 14 July 2004 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with the Act referred to at point 5cl of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services), as incorporated into the Agreement on the European Economic Area, adopted by Decision 194/04/COL.
Posvetovanje je potekalo od 4. februarja do 18. marca 2016.
The consultation took place between 4 February and 18 March 2016.
PRILOGA
ANNEX
Trg 1 Veleprodajno zaključevanje klicev v posameznih javnih telefonskih omrežjih na fiksni lokaciji
Market 1 Wholesale call termination on individual public telephone networks provided at a fixed location
Trg 2 Veleprodajno zaključevanje govornih klicev v posameznih mobilnih omrežjih
Market 2 Wholesale voice call termination on individual mobile networks
Trg 3 (a) Veleprodajni lokalni dostop na fiksni lokaciji
Market 3 (a) Wholesale local access provided at a fixed location
Veleprodajni osrednji dostop na fiksni lokaciji za izdelke za množični trg
Wholesale central access provided at a fixed location for mass-market products
Trg 4 Veleprodajni visokokakovostni dostop na fiksni lokaciji
No 94/16/COL
št. 94/16/COL
to require Norway not to adopt the measure notified on the basis of Article 4(2) of the Act referred to at point 56g of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 97/70/EC setting up a harmonised safety regime for fishing vessels of 24 metres in length and over) regarding vessels using refrigerated seawater tanks to fulfil stability requirements [2016/1891]
o zahtevi, da Norveška ne sprejme ukrepa, priglašenega na podlagi člena 4(2) Akta iz točke 56g Priloge XIII k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 97/70/ES o vzpostavitvi usklajenega varnostnega režima za ribiška plovila dolžine 24 metrov in več), za plovila s cisternami z globoko ohlajeno morsko vodo, da bi izpolnila zahteve glede stabilnosti [2016/1891]
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 56g in Chapter V of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 97/70/EC of 11 December 1997 setting up a harmonised safety regime for fishing vessels of 24 metres in length and over [1], as amended (‘the Act’)) as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, and in particular to Article 4(4)(b) of the Act,
ob upoštevanju Akta iz točke 56g poglavja V Priloge XIII k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 97/70/ES z dne 11. decembra 1997 o vzpostavitvi usklajenega varnostnega režima za ribiška plovila dolžine 24 metrov in več [1], s spremembami (Akt)), kakor je bil prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu, in zlasti člena 4(4)(b) Akta,
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Transport Committee,
ukrepi iz te odločbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora Efte za promet,
Acting in accordance with the examination procedure,
v skladu s postopkom pregleda,
Having regard to Decision 103/13/COL of the EFTA Surveillance Authority (‘the Authority’) of 13 March 2013 empowering the College Member with special responsibility for transport to take certain decisions (Doc.
ob upoštevanju Odločbe 103/13/COL Nadzornega organa Efte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Nadzorni organ) z dne 13. marca 2013 o pooblastitvi člana kolegija s posebno odgovornostjo za promet, da sprejme nekatere odločbe (dok. št. 578349),
No 578349),
ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
Whereas:
Norveški pomorski organ je 21. aprila 2015 priglasil izjemo s sklicevanjem na člen 4(2) Akta v zvezi z ribiškimi plovili s cisternami z globoko ohlajeno morsko vodo kot balast (dok. št. 754705).
On 21 April 2015, a notification of exemption was submitted by the Norwegian Maritime Authority invoking Article 4(2) of the Act with respect to fishing vessels using refrigerated seawater tanks as ballast (Doc.
Nadzorni organ je 16. septembra 2015 obvestil Norveško, da meni, da predložena priglasitev ni bila podprta z zadostnimi dokazi (dok. št. 773295), in je Norveško pozval, naj umakne svojo priglasitev ali predloži dodatna dokazila za obstoječo priglasitev.
No 754705).
Norveška je z elektronskim sporočilom z dne 25. septembra 2015 Nadzorni organ obvestila, da bo posredovala dodatno dokumentacijo (dok. št. 774042).
On 16 September 2015, the Authority informed Norway that it considered that the notification submitted was not supported by sufficient evidence (Doc.
Nadzorni organ je 23. novembra 2015 prejel dodatne informacije, ki jih je predložil norveški pomorski organ (dok. št. 781516).