natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Emphasises the fact that 10703 tonnes of CO2 emissions per year would be saved if Strasbourg (10235) and Luxembourg (468) were no longer used as places of work; regrets the fact that this environmental impact of the geographic dispersion of Parliament in terms of carbon emissions accounts for 11,16 % of Parliament’s total carbon footprint in 2011;
poudarja, da bi na leto ustvarili 10703 ton emisij CO2 manj, če Strasbourg (10235) in Luxembourg (468) ne bi bila več kraja dela; obžaluje, da so okoljske posledice geografske razpršitve Parlamenta v smislu emisij ogljikovega dioksida predstavljale 11,16 % celotnega ogljičnega odtisa Parlamenta v letu 2011;
Is looking forward to the publication of the Court of Auditors study to provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential savings for the Union budget if Parliament had only one working place, as requested in its resolution of 20 November 2013 on the location of the seats of the European Union’s Institutions and asks that this analysis includes budgetary aspects and ancillary costs such as savings made through the reduced loss of working time and greater efficiency; asks not only to look into the travel costs for Parliament staff (including interim staff, external experts and temporary agents) but also to the increased travel costs for Commission and Council staff due to the multiple location sites;
pričakuje, da bo objava študije Računskega sodišča ponudila celovito analizo morebitnih prihrankov za proračun Unije v primeru, da bi Parlament imel le en kraj dela, kot je ta zahteval v svoji resoluciji z dne 20. novembra 2013 o določitvi sedežev institucij Evropske unije, in poziva, naj ta analiza vključuje proračunske vidike dodatnih stroškov, kot so prihranki zaradi manjše izgube delovnega časa in zaradi večje učinkovitosti; poziva, naj se ne pregledajo zgolj potni stroški osebja Parlamenta (vključno s pogodbenim osebjem, zunanjimi strokovnjaki in začasnimi uslužbenci), ampak tudi vedno večji potni stroški osebja Komisije in Sveta zaradi številnih krajev dela;
Management of Parliament’s administration: strengthening operational efficiency
Vodenje uprave Parlamenta: povečevanje operativne učinkovitosti
Reaffirms, yet again, that this resolution remains principally focussed on the budget implementation and discharge for the financial year 2012 and that its main goal is to ensure that taxpayers’ public money is used in the best possible way while highlighting where more efficient gains may be achievable; calls on Parliament’s responsible bodies to continue improving, at all possible levels, efficiency in Parliament’s daily work while always aiming to deliver an enhanced service to the citizens of the Union; expects that the Secretary-General will focus more on efficiency and effectiveness of expenditure in his next annual report to the Committee on Budgetary Control;
znova poudarja, da je ta resolucija osredotočena predvsem na izvrševanje proračuna in razrešnico za proračunsko leto 2012 ter da je njen glavni cilj zagotoviti čim učinkovitejšo porabo davkoplačevalskega denarja ter opredeliti področja, kjer so možne izboljšave učinkovitosti; spodbuja pristojne organe Parlamenta, naj še naprej na vseh možnih ravneh izboljšujejo učinkovitost vsakodnevnega dela Parlamenta ter naj si nenehno prizadevajo za zagotavljanje čim boljših storitev državljanom Unije; pričakuje, da se bo generalni sekretar v svojem naslednjem letnem poročilu Odboru za proračunski nadzor bolj osredotočil na učinkovitost in uspešnost odhodkov;
Is of the opinion that during the 2009-2014 legislative term, in a difficult economic and financial context, often random and temporary, although significant, savings were achieved; believes that Parliament’s administration should identify additional efficiency measures that carry systematic and definitive structural savings, firstly by reducing Parliament’s budget and secondly by allowing for the redeployment of resources to Parliament’s new areas of intervention, notably to reinforce the scrutiny dimension over the Commission’s implementation of the Union’s policies;
meni, da so bili v zakonodajnem obdobju 2009–2014, ko so bile gospodarske in finančne razmere zelo slabe, ustvarjeni pomembni prihranki, čeprav so bili pogosto naključni in začasni; meni, da bi morala uprava Parlamenta opredeliti dodatne ukrepe za večjo učinkovitost, ki bi privedli do sistematičnih in dokončnih strukturnih prihrankov, najprej z zmanjšanjem proračuna Parlamenta in nato z omogočanjem prerazporeditve sredstev na nova področja delovanja Parlamenta, zlasti za okrepitev nadzora nad tem, kako Komisija uresničuje politike Unije;
Calls on Parliament’s administration to consider increasing the use of the available technologies such as teleconferences and teleworking in order to reduce the administrative and travelling costs; requests that a concrete proposal for the enlarged use of both technologies is made available; estimates that significant extra savings, without compromising the quality of actions, may be achieved and that, apart from financial gains, the use of videoconferencing and teleworking could also contribute to a more efficient use of time and a more environmentally friendly Parliament;
poziva upravo Parlamenta, naj razmisli o povečanju uporabe razpoložljivih tehnologij, kot so telekonference in delo na daljavo, da bi zmanjšala upravne in potne stroške; zahteva, da se pripravi konkreten predlog za razširjeno uporabo obeh tehnologij; ocenjuje, da bi bilo mogoče doseči občutne dodatne prihranke, ne da se ogrozi kakovost dejavnosti, ter da bi lahko uporaba videokonferenc in dela na daljavo – poleg finančnih koristi – prispevala tudi k bolj učinkoviti porabi časa in k okolju prijaznejšemu Parlamentu;
Calls on the administration to apply further smart cost-cutting measures to enable savings to be made without impairing the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of parliamentary activities;
poziva upravo, naj uporabi dodatne premišljene ukrepe za zmanjševanje stroškov, da bi omogočila ustvarjanje prihrankov brez škode za učinkovitost, uspešnost in kakovost parlamentarnih dejavnosti;
Directorate-General Presidency
Generalni direktorat predsedstva
Notes that DG PRES has been reorganised, resulting in the creation of a new DG EPRS (Parliamentary Research Service) and that Parliament’s security services have been internalised, resulting in the creation of DG Security; expresses satisfaction that the internalisation of security is projected to produce savings of more than EUR 11 million over the period 2013-2016; notes, however, that five members of the President’s Cabinet are earmarked for posts as directors-general or directors in Parliament’s administration; criticises this political hijacking of management positions and the undermining of the Staff Regulations; points out that the Union criticises political patronage around the world, and calls for that principle to be observed with regard to Parliament’s administration, too; would like to be informed by the Secretary-General on an annual basis on the exact amount saved, which might be a good example leading to the internalisation of other services now provided by third parties;
je seznanjen z reorganizacijo GD PRES, v sklopu katere je bil ustanovljen novi GD EPRS (služba za parlamentarne raziskave), in internalizacijo varnostne službe Parlamenta, pri kateri je bil ustanovljen GD za varnost; izraža zadovoljstvo, ker bi naj internalizacija varnostne službe v obdobju 2013–2016 ustvarila več kot 11 milijonov EUR prihrankov; ugotavlja pa, da so za pet sodelavcev iz kabineta predsednika predvidena mesta generalnih direktorjev in direktorjev v upravi Evropskega parlamenta; kritizira ta politični poseg v vodilne položaje in spodkopavanje kadrovskih predpisov; spominja, da Unija po vsem svetu graja politično pokroviteljstvo, in zahteva, da se ta načela spoštujejo tudi pri upravljanju Evropskega parlamenta; želi, da bi ga generalni sekretar vsako leto obveščal o natančnem prihranjenem znesku, kar bi lahko predstavljalo dober zgled pred internalizacijo drugih storitev, ki jih sedaj zagotavljajo tretje strani;
Notes that a Director-General’s post has been filled but that six months after the appointment, the staff member selected has still not taken up the post; calls for that Director-General’s post to be abolished;
ugotavlja, da je eno od mest generalnega direktorja sicer zasedeno, vendar izbrani zaposleni tudi šest mesecev po imenovanju ni prevzel funkcije; zahteva, da se to mesto generalnega direktorja ukine;
Directorate-General for External Policies
Generalni direktorat za zunanjo politiko
Notes with concern that because of general calls for thrift, the interparliamentary delegations might become less able to maintain Parliament’s external relations profile, enabling it to remain as visible as the other Union institutions, especially the Commission and the Council, and that the effect might be to undermine the parliamentary approach to external policy and the consolidation of parliamentary diplomacy to complement the activities of the Commission and the EEAS; considers it vital, therefore, to preserve the knowledge and experience which Parliament has acquired in overseeing European projects and making them visible and to ensure that the measures proposed do not weaken the power and effectiveness of Parliament’s interparliamentary dialogue with other countries, especially at times of political instability and danger to democracy (the Arab Spring, conflict in the Middle East, conflict in Ukraine, run-up to controversial elections, etc.); strongly recommends that the appropriate level of coordination with the EEAS services for the preparation and effective capacity response be ensured to guarantee the security aspects of Parliament’s external delegations and missions;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da utegnejo medparlamentarne delegacije zaradi splošnih pozivov k varčnosti izgubiti možnost ohranjanja prepoznavnosti Parlamenta v zunanjih odnosih in omogočati, da ohranja enako raven prepoznavnosti kot druge institucije Unije, zlasti Komisija in Svet, ter da se posledično utegne ogroziti parlamentarni pristop do zunanje politike in utrjevanje parlamentarne diplomacije kot dopolnila dejavnostim Komisije in ESZD; zato šteje za bistveno ohranjanje znanja in izkušenj, ki jih je Parlament pridobil pri nadzoru evropskih projektov in skrbi za njihovo prepoznavnost, ter zagotavljati, da predlagani ukrepi ne oslabijo moči in učinkovitosti medparlamentarnega dialoga Parlamenta z drugimi državami, zlasti v obdobjih politične nestabilnosti in nevarnosti za demokracijo (med arabsko pomladjo, v konfliktu na Bližnjem Vzhodu, v konfliktu v Ukrajini, med pripravami na sporne volitve itd.); močno priporoča, da se poskrbi za ustrezno raven usklajevanja s službami ESZD pri pripravi in odzivanju z dejanskimi zmogljivostmi za zagotovitev varnostnih vidikov dela zunanjih delegacij in misij Parlamenta;
Directorate-General for Communication
Generalni direktorat za komuniciranje
Notes that DG COMM has a large budget under line 3242, ‘Publication, information and participation in public meetings’; sees more and more outsourcing with additional costs for the taxpayer; asks for a detailed list on outsourcing measures and cost thereof in DG COMM;
opaža, da ima GD COMM velik proračun v okviru vrstice 3242 – „Odhodki za publikacije, informiranje in udeležbo na javnih prireditvah“; opaža, da vedno več dela opravijo zunanji izvajalci, kar pomeni dodatne stroške za davkoplačevalce; prosi za podroben seznam ukrepov oddajanja dela zunanjim izvajalcem in njihovih stroškov v okviru GD COMM;
Is concerned about possible undetected conflicts of interest in connection with the award of grants from Parliament’s budget; points to Article 58 of the Financial Regulation and to the Administration’s obligation to verify declarations issued by grantees and contractors; calls for information as to what risk analyses are carried out by Parliament’s Administration in respect of those declarations in order to verify the veracity thereof;
je zaskrbljen zaradi morebitnih neodkritih primerov navzkrižja interesov pri dodeljevanju nepovratnih sredstev iz proračuna Parlamenta; spominja na člen 58 finančne uredbe in obvezo uprave za revizijo oddanih izjav prejemnikov nepovratnih sredstev in izvajalcev; zahteva informacije o tem, s katerimi analizami tveganja uprava Parlamenta preveri verodostojnost teh izjav;
Information Offices
Informacijske pisarne
Notes that mission expenses in 2012 for the staff of the Information Offices amounted to EUR 1,8 million with missions to Strasbourg accounting for just over EUR 1 million; insists that priority should be given to the use of videoconferences, making both structural cost reductions to the Parliament’s budget and environmental improvements, which do not detract from Parliament’s work;
ugotavlja, da so stroški službenih potovanj uslužbencev informacijskih pisarn v letu 2012 znašali 1,8 milijona EUR, od tega za potovanja v Strasbourg nekoliko več kot 1 milijon EUR; vztraja, da je treba dati prednost videokonferencam, kar bo prispevalo k strukturnemu zmanjšanju stroškov za proračun Parlamenta in k varstvu okolja, pri čemer delo Parlamenta ne bo na škodi;
Visitors’ groups
Skupine obiskovalcev
Notes that since January 2012, a new set of rules came into force governing the reception of visitors’ groups, including the method of paying subsidies; notes that the Bureau decided to maintain the option to make cash payments to visitor groups; is concerned about the significant reputational and security risk entailed in making cash payments to visitor groups; asks for a new decision of the bureau to abolish cash payments which constitutes a violation of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [17]; takes note that out of approximately 2000 visitor groups annually, only 365 in 2012 received more than EUR 15000 but that the majority of these visitors’ groups opt for cash payment method, although Parliament’s administration encourages payment by bank transfer or a mix of both methods instead;
ugotavlja, da so začela januarja 2012 veljati nova pravila o sprejemu skupin obiskovalcev, vključno z načinom izplačila subvencij; ugotavlja, da se je predsedstvo odločilo ohraniti možnost gotovinskih izplačil skupinam obiskovalcev; je zaskrbljen zaradi precejšnjega tveganja za ugled in varnost pri gotovinskih izplačilih; poziva predsedstvo, naj sprejme nov sklep, s katerim bo odpravilo plačila v gotovini, ki predstavljajo kršitev Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/60/ES [17]; ugotavlja, da Parlament na leto obišče približno 2000 skupin obiskovalcev in da je v letu 2012 samo 365 skupin prejelo več kot 15000 EUR, vendar da se večina skupin odloči za gotovinsko izplačilo, čeprav uprava Parlamenta spodbuja bančna nakazila ali vsaj obe metodi hkrati;
House of European History
Hiša evropske zgodovine
Takes note that co-financing from the Commission for the running costs of the House of European History has been secured with EUR 800000 in commitment appropriations in its 2014 budget, assigned to Heading 3 of the Multiannual Financial Framework; notes further that the amount corresponds to 30 % of the budgeted running costs for that year and is also intended to cover the expenditure allowing a seventh opening day every week;
je seznanjen, da je Komisija v svojem proračunu za leto 2014 zagotovila sofinanciranje tekočih stroškov Hiše evropske zgodovine v znesku 800000 EUR v sredstvih za prevzem obveznosti, in sicer v razdelku 3 večletnega finančnega okvira; ugotavlja še, da ta znesek ustreza 30 % v proračunu predvidenih tekočih stroškov za to leto, namenjen pa naj bi bil tudi stroškom, nastalim zaradi odpiralnega časa sedem dni na teden;
Notes that on 22 October 2012, the Bureau fundamentally endorsed the concept for the permanent exhibition at the House of European History;
je seznanjen, da je predsedstvo 22. oktobra 2012 v osnovi podprlo koncept stalne razstave v Hiši evropske zgodovine;
Notes that in the 2012 budget adopted by Parliament in plenary, EUR 8,5 million was earmarked for the EuroparlTV under the budget line 3246; recognises that whereas the budget for the EuroparlTV has been substantially reduced from EUR 9 million in 2008 to EUR 5 million in 2014, the performance of this service has been improved with a number of new activities and projects, inter alia, a larger proportion of ready to use audiovisual products with a longer lifespan, and a series of exclusive co-productions with national TV channels in several Member States, resulting in increasing audiences numbers; welcomes the ever increasing number of Parliament’s followers on social media, in particular on Facebook with its current more than 1,2 millions ‘friends’, for which exclusive EuroparlTV productions are developed; looks forward to receiving the independent evaluation study of Parliament’s online multimedia production commissioned in accordance with the decision of the Bureau of 3 December 2012;
meni, da EuroparlTV ni osrednja dejavnost Parlamenta, in zahteva, da se pred razvojem novih dejavnosti EuroparlTV opravi analiza stroškov in koristi;
Considers EuroparlTV not to be a core activity of Parliament and requests that a cost-benefit analysis be carried out before any new EuroparlTV activities are developed;
Generalni direktorat za kadrovske zadeve
Directorate-General for Personnel
opozarja na težave pri zaposlovanju uradnikov in uslužbencev iz nekaterih držav članic, kot so Nemčija, Združeno kraljestvo, Avstrija in Nizozemska, saj je njihov delež med zaposlenimi v sekretariatu Parlamenta občutno nižji kot „demografska teža“ teh držav v Uniji, in ugotavlja, da je število zaposlenih, ki so državljani Belgije (13,6 %) in Luksemburga (2,2 %), relativno veliko zaradi krajev dela Parlamenta; poziva predsedstvo, naj pregleda postopke in zahteve zaposlovanja, da bi ugotovilo, kako prispevajo k težavam pri zaposlovanju uslužbencev iz teh držav članic;
Points to the difficulties in recruiting officials or agents from certain Member States such as Germany, the UK, Austria or the Netherlands, for which the proportion of staff in Parliament’s Secretariat is significantly lower than the ‘demographic weight’ of the given country within the Union and observes the relatively high numbers of staff of holding the nationality of Belgium (13,6 %) or Luxembourg (2,2 %) as a result of the working places of Parliament; asks the Bureau to review recruitment procedures and requirements to ascertain what part they may play in creating difficulties to recruit staff from these Member States;
zahteva pojasnilo o modelu zaposlovanja lokalnih pomočnikov v Strasbourgu in podrobnejše informacije o zaposlovanju pomočnikov v Bruslju med tedni zasedanj v Strasbourgu; zahteva, da uprava Parlamenta pripravi poročilo o tem, ali se v primeru lokalnih pomočnikov v Strasbourgu spoštuje delovna in socialna zakonodaja Unije ter kako se preprečuje navidezno samozaposlovanje; zahteva primerjavo stroškov, da bi poiskali najugodnejšo rešitev za davkoplačevalce;
Calls for information on the employment arrangements for local ushers in Strasbourg and the employment arrangements for ushers in Brussels during Strasbourg weeks; calls for a report by Parliament’s administration on whether, in the case of local ushers in Strasbourg, Union labour and social security law is complied with and on the precautions taken against bogus self-employment; calls for a cost comparison, with a view to establishing the best option for the taxpayer;
je dobro seznanjen s sodbo Sodišča za uslužbence v zadevi F-129/12 z dne 12. decembra 2013 in globoko obžaluje, da je bil Parlament obsojen, ker ni bil sposoben zagotoviti pomoči v primerih nadlegovanja in nezakonitega odpuščanja; zato naroča pristojnim službam, naj sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da v prihodnosti ne bi prišlo do podobnih primerov;
Takes good note of the Civil Service Tribunal Decision of 12 December 2013 on Case F-129/12 and deeply regrets the fact that Parliament was condemned for being unable to provide assistance in cases of harassment and irregular lay-offs; therefore instructs the competent services to take all necessary measures in order to avoid similar situations in the future;
prosi za poročilo o povečanju števila delovnih mest kategorij AD in AST v upravi Parlamenta od leta 2005 do sedanjega proračunskega obdobja; prav tako prosi za razvrstitev po razredih in državljanstvu;
Asks for a report on the increase in AD and AST posts in Parliament’s administration between 2005 and the current financial year; asks for a breakdown by grade and nationality;
prosi za poročilo o povečanju števila delovnih mest direktorjev in generalnih direktorjev v upravi Parlamenta od leta 2005; prav tako prosi za razvrstitev po državljanstvu;
Asks for a report on the increase in posts for Directors and Directors-General in Parliament’s administration since 2005; asks for a breakdown by nationality;
prosi za poročilo o tem, koliko sodelavcev političnih skupin je od leta 2009 pridobilo status uradnika prek (a) običajnega izbirnega postopka in (b) prek t. i. postopka „passerelle“;
Asks for a report on how many political group staff have become officials since 2009 (a) under a conventional selection procedure and (b) on the basis of the ‘passarelle’ clause;
poudarja, da ima več kot 1500 zaposlenih v Parlamentu otroke vpisane v evropske šole; vztraja, da mora Parlament odigrati vodilno vlogo pri organizacijski strukturi šol;
Points out that over 1500 members of Parliament’s staff have children enrolled at the European Schools; maintains that Parliament has to play a leading role within the organisational structure of the schools;
Generalni direktorat za infrastrukturo in logistiko
Directorate-General for Infrastructure and Logistics (DG INLO)
Nepremičninska politika Parlamenta
Parliaments’ Buildings policy
poudarja, da je Parlament z leti postal lastnik nepremičnin in da ta strategija prinaša tudi tveganja, stroški uporabe in vzdrževanja pa bodo zaradi staranja stavb v prihodnje gotovo naraščali; poudarja zlasti, da je treba v vseh nepremičninskih strategijah upoštevati tudi te naraščajoče stroške in potrebno obnovo stavb v srednjeročnem obdobju; poudarja, da mora nepremičninska strategija zagotoviti vzdržnost proračuna Parlamenta in ohraniti določeno stopnjo prožnosti s kombinacijo nakupov, najema in služnostne pravice, da se zagotovi najbolj konkurenčne cene za Parlament; poudarja, da nakup nepremičnine ni nujno najboljša rešitev;
Highlights the fact that the Parliament has become, over the years, a property owner and that this strategy has inherent risks and that costs for the operation and maintenance of the technical facilities will necessarily increase in the future years to cope with ageing buildings; stresses in particular that any property and buildings strategy must also take into account those rising costs and the necessity over the medium term of building renovations; points out that the property and buildings strategy must ensure the sustainability of Parliament’s budget and conserve a certain degree of flexibility with a combination of acquisitions, renting or usufruct in order to ensure the best value for money for Parliament; underlines that purchasing a building may not be always the best solution;
ugotavlja, da so se začele v letu 2012 izvajati revizije najemnih pogodb, kar zadeva finančne pogoje, zlasti glede na gibanja na trgu najema nepremičnin; pozdravlja dejstvo, da bodo ta ponovna pogajanja v prihodnjih letih prinesla naslednje strukturne prihranke:
Takes note that during 2012, a series of contractual revisions began, case by case, concerning the financial terms, particularly in light of trends on the property rental market; welcomes that these renegotiations will result in the following structural savings in the years ahead:
služnostna pravica za stavbo Wiertz bo omogočila prihranek 0,45 milijona EUR letno pri nepremičninskem davku in stroških,
usufruct of the Wiertz Building translated into a cost reduction of EUR 0,45 million per annum on property tax and charges;
selitev v stavbo Geos v letu 2014 bo omogočila prihranek 5 milijonov EUR v 45 mesecih,
removal to the Geos Building in 2014 translated into a cost reduction of EUR 5 million over 45 months;
popravek najemne pogodbe za stavbo Goldbell bo omogočil prihranek 2,5 milijona EUR do konca leta 2017,