natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although the Authority’s Guidelines on restructuring and rescuing firms in difficulty [29] apply to transport only to the extent that the specific nature of the sector is taken into account, the Authority will apply those Guidelines or any other Guidelines or EEA legislation replacing them in considering restructuring aid for maritime companies.
Čeprav se Smernice Organa za prestrukturiranje in reševanje podjetij v težavah [29] za promet uporabljajo le v obsegu, kolikor se upošteva posebna narava sektorja, Organ uporablja te smernice ali katere koli druge smernice ali zakonodajo EGP, ki jih nadomešča, pri obravnavanju pomoči za prestrukturiranje pomorskih družb.
Public service obligations and contracts
Obveznosti javnih storitev in javna naročila storitev
In the field of maritime cabotage, public service obligations (PSOs) may be imposed or public service contracts (PSCs) may be concluded for the services indicated in Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92, incorporated as point 53(a) in Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement [30].
Na področju pomorske kabotaže se lahko naložijo obveznosti javnih storitev ali dodelijo javna naročila storitev, in sicer za storitve iz člena 4 Uredbe (EGS) št. 3577/92, vključenega kot točka 53a v Prilogi XIII k Sporazumu EGP [30].
For those services, PSOs and PSCs as well as their compensation must fulfil the conditions of that provision and the rules of the EEA Agreement and procedures governing State aid, as interpreted by the EFTA Court, and the European Court of Justice for the corresponding EC Treaty provisions and procedures governing State aid in the Community.
Za te storitve morajo obveznosti javnih storitev in javna naročila storitev, kot tudi nadomestila zanje, izpolnjevati pogoje navedene določbe in pravila Sporazuma EGP ter postopkov, ki urejajo državno pomoč, kot jih razlagata Sodišče Efte in Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti za ustrezne določbe Pogodbe ES in postopke, ki urejajo državno pomoč v Skupnosti.
The Authority accepts that if an international transport service is necessary to meet imperative public transport needs, PSOs may be imposed or PSCs may be concluded, provided that any compensation is subject to the abovementioned rules of the EEA Agreement and procedures.
Organ soglaša, da se lahko pri potrebi po storitvah mednarodnega prometa naložijo obveznosti javnih storitev ali dodelijo javna naročila storitev, pod pogojem, da se za vsakršno nadomestilo uporabljajo zgoraj navedena pravila in postopki iz Sporazuma EGP.
The duration of public service contracts should be limited to a reasonable and not overlong period, normally in the order of six years, since contracts for significantly longer periods could entail the danger of creating a (private) monopoly.
Trajanje naročil javnih storitev mora biti omejeno na razumno in ne predolgo obdobje, običajno za šest let, saj lahko naročila za precej daljša obdobja povzročijo nevarnost ustvarjanja (zasebnega) monopola.
Aid to Short Sea Shipping
Pomoč za prevoze po morju na kratkih razdaljah
There is no legal definition of “Short Sea Shipping”.
Pravne opredelitve ‚prevozov po morju na kratkih razdaljah‘ ni.
However, the communication from the EC Commission on the development of Short Sea Shipping in Europe of 29 June 1999 [31] has provided a working definition of Short Sea Shipping, to be understood as “the movement of cargo and passenger by sea between ports situated in geographical Europe or between those ports and ports situated in non-European countries having a coastline on the enclosed seas bordering Europe” [32].
Vendar pa je v sporočilu Komisije ES o razvoju prevozov po morju na kratkih razdaljah v Evropi z dne 29. junija 1999 [31] določena delovna opredelitev prevozov po morju na kratkih razdaljah, ki jo je treba razumeti kot ‚pretok tovora in potnikov po morju med pristanišči, ki se nahajajo v geografski Evropi, ali med temi pristanišči in pristanišči, ki se nahajajo v neevropskih državah, ki z obalno črto na zaprtih morjih mejijo na Evropo‘ [32].
In this Communication the EC Commission underscored the role of this transport mode to promote sustainable and safe mobility, to strengthen cohesion within the EEA and to improve transport efficiency as part of an intermodal approach.
V tem sporočilu je Komisija ES poudarila vlogo tega načina prevoza za pospešitev trajnostne in varne mobilnosti, krepitev kohezije znotraj EGP in izboljšanje učinkovitosti prometa kot dela intermodalnega pristopa.
The Authority also recognises that the promotion of Short Sea Shipping must be carried out at all levels, whether at the level of the EEA, national or regional.
Organ tudi priznava, da je treba prevoze po morju na kratkih razdaljah spodbujati na vseh ravneh, pa naj bo to na ravni EGP, nacionalni ali regionalni ravni.
Since aid to Short Sea Shipping aims to improve the intermodal chain and to decongest roads in the EEA States, the definition of Short Sea Shipping such as provided by the EC Commission’s 1999 communication should, for the purposes of these Guidelines, be restricted to transport between ports in the territory of the EEA States.
Ker je cilj pomoči prevozom po morju na kratkih razdaljah izboljšati intermodalne verige in razbremeniti ceste v državah EGP, je treba opredelitev prevozov po morju na kratkih razdaljah iz sporočila Komisije ES iz leta 1999 za namene teh smernic omejiti na prevoze med pristanišči na ozemlju držav EGP.
The Authority recognises that launching Short Sea Shipping services may be accompanied by substantial financial difficulties which the EEA States may wish to attenuate in order to ensure the promotion of such services.
Organ priznava, da lahko uvedbo storitev prevozov po morju na kratkih razdaljah spremljajo znatne finančne težave, ki jih želijo države EGP ublažiti, da bi zagotovile spodbujanje takšnih storitev.
When such is the case, the Authority will be able to approve aid of this kind, on condition that it is intended for shipowners within the meaning of Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 [33], incorporated as point 53 of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement, in respect of ships flying the flag of one of the EEA States.
V takšnem primeru lahko Organ odobri tovrstno pomoč, pod pogojem, da je namenjena lastnikom ladij v smislu člena 1 Uredbe (EGS) št. 4055/86, [33] vključenega kot točka 53 v Prilogi XIII k Sporazumu EGP, za ladje, ki plujejo pod zastavo ene od držav EGP.
Aid of this kind will have to be notified and to fulfil the following conditions:
Tovrstna pomoč je predmet priglasitve in mora izpolnjevati naslednje pogoje:
the aid must not exceed three years in duration and its purpose must be to finance a shipping service connecting ports situated in the territory of the EEA States,
pomoč ne sme trajati več kot tri leta, njen namen pa mora biti financiranje storitev pomorskih prevozov, ki povezujejo pristanišča, ki se nahajajo na ozemlju držav EGP,
the service must be of such a kind as to permit transport (of cargo essentially) by road to be carried out wholly or partly by sea, without diverting maritime transport in a way which is contrary to the common interest,
storitve morajo biti takšne vrste, da omogočajo, da se cestni (predvsem tovorni) promet lahko v celoti ali deloma izvede po morju, ne da bi se pri tem pomorski promet preusmerjal na način, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnim interesom,
the aid must be directed at implementing a detailed project with a pre-established environmental impact, concerning a new route or the upgrading of services on an existing one, associating several shipowners, if necessary, with no more than one project financed per line and with no renewal, extension or repetition of the project in question,
pomoč je treba usmerjati v izvajanje podrobnega projekta z vnaprej določenim okoljskim učinkom, ki se nanaša na novo pot ali posodobitev storitev v okviru že obstoječe, po potrebi povezovanje več lastnikov ladij, pri čemer se na posamezno linijo financira največ en projekt, ter brez obnovitve, podaljšanja ali ponovitve zadevnega projekta,
the purpose of the aid must be to cover, either up to 30 % of the operational costs of the service in question [34], or to finance the purchase of trans-shipment equipment to supply the planned service, up to a level of 10 % in such investment,the aid to implement a project must be granted on the basis of transparent criteria applied in a non-discriminatory way to shipowners established in the EEA.
namen pomoči mora biti bodisi pokrivati do 30 % operativnih stroškov zadevne storitve [34] bodisi financirati nakup opreme za pretovarjanje zaradi opravljanja načrtovane storitve, ki znaša do 10 % takšne naložbe,pomoč za izvajanje projekta je treba dodeliti na podlagi preglednih meril, ki se nediskriminatorno uporabljajo za lastnike ladij s sedežem v EGP.
The aid should normally be granted for a project selected by the authorities of the EEA State through a tender procedure in compliance with applicable Community rules,
Pomoč se običajno dodeli za projekt, ki ga organi države EGP izberejo na podlagi razpisnega postopka, skladnega z veljavnimi pravili Skupnosti,
the service which is the subject of the project must be of a kind to be commercially viable after the period in which it is eligible for public funding,
storitev, ki je predmet projekta, mora biti takšne vrste, da je komercialno uspešna po obdobju, ko je upravičena do javnega financiranja,
such aid must not be cumulated with public service compensation (obligations or contracts).
takšna pomoč se ne sme združevati z nadomestilom za javne storitve (obveznosti ali naročila).
As was explained above, certain EEA States support their maritime sectors through tax reduction whilst other EEA States prefer to make direct payments — for instance, by providing reimbursement of seafarers’ income tax.
Kot je razloženo zgoraj, nekatere države EGP podpirajo svoje pomorske sektorje z znižanjem davkov, medtem ko druge države EGP raje opravljajo neposredna plačila – na primer z zagotavljanjem nadomestila za davek na dohodek pomorščakov.
In view of the differences between the fiscal systems of the EEA States, it is felt that the two alternatives should remain possible.
Glede na razlike med davčnimi sistemi držav EGP, naj bi ti možnosti ostali še naprej na razpolago.
Obviously, those two approaches may, in some instances, be combined.
Očitno je, da se lahko ta pristopa v nekaterih primerih združujeta.
However, this risks causing a cumulation of aid to levels which are disproportionate to the objectives of the common interest of the Contracting Parties and could lead to a subsidy race between EEA States.
Vendarle pa to prinaša tveganje, da se pomoč toliko kumulira, da to ni v sorazmerju s cilji skupnega interesa pogodbenic, kar lahko privede do tekmovanja med državami EGP za subvencije.
A reduction to zero of taxation and social charges for seafarers and a reduction of corporate taxation of shipping activities such as is described in 24A.3.1 (18) is the maximum level of aid which may be permitted.
Znižanje davkov in prispevkov za socialno varnost za pomorščake na nič ter znižanje davka na pravne osebe za dejavnosti pomorskega prometa, kot je opisano v 24A.3.1 (18), je najvišja možna raven pomoči, ki se sme dovoliti.
To avoid distortion of competition, other systems of aid may not provide any greater benefit than this.
Zaradi preprečevanja izkrivljanja konkurence drugi sistemi pomoči ne smejo zagotavljati večjih ugodnosti.
Moreover, although each aid scheme notified by an EFTA State will be examined on its own merits, it is considered that the total amount of aid granted under sections 24A.3 to 24A.6 should not exceed the total amount of taxes and social contributions collected from shipping activities and seafarers.
Poleg tega, čeprav se vsaka shema pomoči, priglašena s strani države Efte, prouči ločeno, velja, da skupni znesek pomoči, dodeljene v skladu z razdelki 24A.3 do 24A.6, ne sme presegati skupnega zneska davkov in socialnih prispevkov, pobranih od dejavnosti pomorskega prometa in pomorščakov.
Final remarks
Končne pripombe
The Authority will continue to monitor regularly and closely the market conditions for shipping.
Organ bo še naprej redno in natančno spremljal tržne pogoje za ladijski promet.
Should the latter change, and should consequently the need for State aid be reduced or overcome, the Authority will take the necessary measures in good time.
Če se slednji spremenijo in se zaradi tega zmanjša ali odpravi potreba po državni pomoči, Organ pravočasno ukrepa.
All new proposals for measures notified to the Authority must include a calendar indicating, for the next six years, the expected quantified effects for each objective of Section 24A.2.2.
Vsi novi predlogi za ukrepe, priglašene Organu, morajo vključevati koledar, ki za naslednjih šest let navaja pričakovane količinske učinke za vsak cilj iz razdelka 24A.2.2.
In particular, the expected macroeconomic return on the corresponding maritime cluster, together with an estimation of the number of jobs saved or created, is to be presented in such proposals.
V takšnih predlogih je treba predstaviti zlasti pričakovani makroekonomski donos ustreznega pomorskega sklopa, skupaj z oceno števila ohranjenih ali ustvarjenih delovnih mest.
For all the aid schemes — whether existing or new — falling within the scope of these Guidelines, EFTA States are to communicate to the Authority an assessment of their effects during their sixth year of implementation.
Za vse že obstoječe ali nove sheme pomoči, ki sodijo v okvir teh smernic, morajo države Efte Organu sporočiti oceno njihovih učinkov v šestletnem obdobju izvajanja.
When aid has been approved and granted to a beneficiary, under the derogation from the flag link referred to in Section 24A.3.1, the relevant EFTA State must report to the Authority every three years starting from the date when the grant was granted.
Ko se pomoč odobri in dodeli upravičencu v skladu z odstopanjem od povezave z zastavo iz razdelka 24A.3.1, mora zadevna država Efte Organu poročati vsaka tri leta od datuma dodelitve pomoči.
In its report, the EFTA State will quantify the effects produced and compare the results with the expected effects.
V svojem poročilu država Efte količinsko opredeli nastale učinke in primerja rezultate s pričakovanimi učinki.
The reporting requirements set out in these Guidelines will enter into force upon their adoption.
Zahteve za poročanje iz teh smernic začnejo veljati takoj po njihovem sprejetju.
Furthermore, should it prove necessary, for example following a justified complaint, the EFTA State concerned must provide the Authority with evidence that the assistance granted to the respective beneficiary under an agreed scheme has been limited to the strict definition therein and has also produced the effects expected.
Poleg tega mora zadevna država Efte po potrebi, na primer na podlagi utemeljene pritožbe, Organu predložiti dokaze, ki kažejo, da je pomoč, dodeljena posameznemu upravičencu v skladu z dogovorjeno shemo, omejena na strogo opredelitev v le-tej in je tudi privedla do pričakovanih učinkov.
These Guidelines will apply from the date of adoption.
Te smernice se uporabljajo od datuma njihovega sprejetja.
In accordance with Article 1(1) in Part I and Article 18 in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the Authority proposes that EFTA States amend their existing aid schemes relating to State aid covered by these Guidelines so as to comply with them by 30 June 2005 at the latest.
V skladu s členom 1(1) v delu I in členom 18 v delu II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču Organ predlaga, da države Efte spremenijo svoje trenutne sheme pomoči, ki se nanašajo na državno pomoč, zajeto v teh smernicah, da se začnejo ravnati v skladu z njimi najpozneje 30. junija 2005.
EFTA States are invited to confirm that they accept these proposals for appropriate measures in writing by 30 June 2004 at the latest.
Države Efte se poziva, da pisno potrdijo svoje soglasje s temi predlogi za ustrezne ukrepe najpozneje do 30. junija 2004.
Should an EFTA State fail to confirm its acceptance in writing by that date, the Authority will apply Article 19(2) in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice and, if necessary, initiate the proceedings referred to in that provision.
Če država Efte do tega datuma pisno ne potrdi sprejetja, Organ uporabi člen 19(2) v delu II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča in po potrebi sproži postopek iz navedene določbe.
These Guidelines will be reviewed within seven years of their date of application.’
Te smernice bodo pregledane v sedmih letih od datuma začetka njihove uporabe.“
Definition of EEA States’ registers for the purpose of the rules in Chapter 24A on aid to maritime transport
Opredelitev registrov držav EGP za namen pravil iz poglavja 24A o pomoči za pomorski promet
“EEA States' registers” should be understood as meaning registers governed by the law of a an EC Member State or an EFTA State party to the EEA Agreement applying to their territories forming part of either the European Community or an EFTA State.
‚Registre držav EGP‘ je treba razumeti kot registre, ki jih ureja zakonodaja države članice ES ali države Efte, podpisnice Sporazuma EGP, ki se uporablja za njeno ozemlje, ki tvori del bodisi Evropske skupnosti bodisi države Efte.
All the first registers of EEA States are EEA States’ registers.
Vsi prvi registri držav EGP so registri držav EGP.
In addition, the following registers, located in EEA States and subject to their laws, are EEA States’ registers:
Poleg tega so registri držav EGP naslednji registri, ki so v državah EGP in zanje velja njihova zakonodaja:
the Danish International Register of Shipping (DIS),
Danski mednarodni ladijski register (DIS),
the German International Shipping Register (ISR),
Nemški mednarodni ladijski register (ISR),
the Italian International Shipping Register,
Italijanski mednarodni ladijski register,
the Madeira International Ship Register (MAR),
Mednarodni ladijski register Madeire (MAR),
the Canary Islands register,
Register Kanarskih otokov,
the Norwegian International Shipping Register (NIS).
Norveški mednarodni ladijski register (NIS).
Other registers are not considered to be EEA States’ registers even if they serve in practice as a first alternative for shipowners based in that EEA State.
Drugi registri se ne obravnavajo kot registri držav EGP, tudi če se v praksi uporabljajo kot prva možnost za lastnike ladij, ki imajo sedež v tej državi EGP.
This is because they are located in and subject to the law of territories where the EC Treaty and hence the EEA Agreement does not, in whole or in substantial part, apply.
To je zato, ker se nahajajo na ozemljih in zanje velja zakonodaja ozemelj, za katera se Pogodba ES in s tem Sporazum EGP sploh ali pa večinoma ne uporablja.
Hence, the following registers are not EEA States’ registers:
Zato naslednji registri niso registri držav EGP:
the Kerguelen register (the EC Treaty does not apply to this territory),
Register otočja Kerguelen (Pogodba ES se ne uporablja za to ozemlje),
the Dutch Antilles’ register (this territory is associated with the Community; and only Part IV of the EC Treaty applies to it; it is responsible for its own fiscal regime),
Register Nizozemskih Antilov (to ozemlje je pridruženo Skupnosti in zanj se uporablja samo del IV Pogodbe ES; odgovorno je za svoj davčni režim),
the registers of:
registri:
Isle of Man (only specific parts of the EC Treaty apply to the Isle — see Article 299(6)(c) of the EC Treaty; the Isle of Man parliament has sole right to legislate on fiscal matters),
otoka Man (za otok se uporabljajo le posebni deli Pogodbe ES – glej člen 299(6)(c) Pogodbe ES; parlament otoka Man ima izključno pravico do sprejemanja predpisov glede davčnih zadev),
Bermuda and Cayman (they are part of the territories associated to the Community, and only Part IV of the EC Treaty applies to them; they enjoy a fiscal autonomy).
Bermudov in Kajmanskih otokov (ti so del ozemelj, pridruženih Skupnosti in zanje se uporablja le del IV Pogodbe ES; ozemlja imajo davčno avtonomijo).
In the case of Gibraltar, the EC Treaty applies fully and the Gibraltar register is, for the purposes of these Guidelines, considered to be an EEA State's register.’
Za Gibraltar se Pogodba ES uporablja v celoti in register Gibraltarja za namene teh smernic velja za register države EGP.“
This chapter corresponds to the Commission communication C(2004) 43 — Community guidelines on State aid to maritime transport, OJ C 13, 17.1.2004, p. 13.
To poglavje ustreza Sporočilu Komisije C(2004) 43 – Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za pomorski promet, UL C 13, 17.1.2004, str. 13.
COM(2001) 370 final.
COM(2001) 370 konč.
Community Guidelines on State aid to maritime transport (97/C 205/05), OJ C 205, 5.7.1997, p. 5.
Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za pomorski promet (97/C 205/05), UL C 205, 5.7.1997, str. 5.
See footnote 1 of this chapter.
Glej opombo 1 v tem poglavju.
ISL, Shipping Statistics 2001.
ISL, Statistika ladijskega prometa 2001.
Further details, in particular figures relevant to the Community fleet and employment of seafarers within the Community, can be taken from the introductory part of the Commission’s communication, referred to in footnote 1 of this chapter.
Dodatni podrobni podatki, zlasti številke, ki so pomembne za ladjevje Skupnosti in zaposlovanje pomorščakov znotraj Skupnosti, so podani v uvodnem delu Sporočila Komisije iz opombe 1 v tem poglavju.
Norway was the only EFTA State replying to the questionnaire.
Norveška je bila edina država Efte, ki je odgovorila na ta vprašalnik.
Communication from the Commission on the training and recruitment of seafarers of 6 April 2001, COM(2001) 188 final.
Sporočilo Komisije o usposabljanju in zaposlovanju pomorščakov z dne 6. aprila 2001, COM(2001) 188 konč.
These activities include port services, logistics, the construction, repair, maintenance, inspection and classification of vessels, ship management and brokerage, banking activities and international financial services, insurance, advice and professional services.
Te dejavnosti vključujejo pristaniške storitve, logistiko, gradnjo, popravila, vzdrževanje, inšpekcijske preglede ter razvrščanje plovil, upravljanje ladij in posredništvo, bančne dejavnosti in mednarodne finančne storitve, zavarovalništvo, svetovanje in strokovne storitve.
Study undertaken by the European Commission, DG Enterprise “Economic impact of maritime industries in Europe”. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/maritime/maritime_industrial/economic_impact_study.htm
Študija, ki jo je opravila Evropska komisija, GD za podjetništvo, z naslovom ‚Gospodarski vpliv pomorske industrije v Evropi‘. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/maritime/maritime_industrial/economic_impact_study.htm
Figure taken from Norway Statistics.
Številka, vzeta iz statističnih podatkov Norveške.
Which was based on the EC Commission’s Guidelines of 1997.
Ki je temeljilo na Smernicah Komisije ES iz leta 1997.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 of 22 December 1986 applying the principle of freedom to services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries (OJ L 378, 31.12.1986, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 4055/86 z dne 22. decembra 1986 o uporabi načela svobode opravljanja storitev v pomorskem prometu med državami članicami ter med državami članicami in tretjimi državami (UL L 378, 31.12.1986, str. 1).
By Joint Committee Decision No 70/97 (OJ L 30, 5.2.1998, p. 42 and EEA Supplement No 5, 5.2.1998, p. 175), e.i.f. 1.8.1998.
S Sklepom Skupnega odbora št. 70/97 (UL L 30, 5.2.1998, str. 42, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 5, 5.2.1998, str. 175), z začetkom veljavnosti 1.8.1998.
See in this respect EC Commission’s White Paper on the European transport policy for 2010, COM(2001) 370 final.
V zvezi s tem glej Belo knjigo Komisije ES o evropski prometni politiki za 2010, COM(2001) 370 konč.
EFTA Court Judgment in Case E-6/98 Government of Norway v. EFTA Surveillance Authority.
Razsodba Sodišča Efte v zadevi E-6/98 Vlada Norveške proti Nadzornemu organu Efte.