natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Takes special note of the internal audit recommendation to create a specific framework on anti-fraud policy, which is lacking at the Council’s General Secretariat; calls on the Council to act in accordance with the recommendation to include the measures taken to implement this recommendation in the annual activity report;
ob upoštevanju členov 317, 318 in 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in člena 106a Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo,
Takes note that the ‘Europa’ building project continues to be closely monitored and that some of the audit recommendations are still lagging behind execution; calls on the Council to inform the discharge authority about the construction progress and the final costs projection compared to the initial budget of EUR 240 million; invites the Council to explain any cost increases incurred between the beginning of the construction works in 2008 and the projected completion in 2014;
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], zlasti členov 55, 145, 146 in 147 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [6], zlasti členov 62, 164, 165 in 166 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 58/2003 z dne 19. decembra 2002 o statutu izvajalskih agencij, pooblaščenih za izvajanje nekaterih nalog pri upravljanju programov Skupnosti [7], zlasti člena 14(2) in (3) Uredbe,ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih sklepov in resolucij o razrešnici,
Calls on the Council to provide an explanation of how measures from the previous period that were adopted with a view to improving the results of the ‘Europa’ building project are being implemented; calls on the Council, furthermore, to explain what added value is brought by the permanent team responsible for monitoring the execution of this project;
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evropskem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo, o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 [8],ob upoštevanju člena 76 in Priloge VI Poslovnika,
Calls for a progress report on the ‘Résidence Palace’ building project and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date;
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenj drugih zadevnih odborov (A7-0242/2014),
Reiterates its call for the Council to provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the Résidence Palace building, the budget items from which these appropriations were drawn, the instalments that have been paid thus far, the instalments that remain to be paid and the purpose that the building will serve;
A. ker Računsko sodišče že devetnajstič zapored ni moglo dati pozitivne izjave o zanesljivosti glede zakonitosti in pravilnosti plačil, povezanih z računovodskimi izkazi;
Takes note of the zero growth in the Council’s budget appropriations for 2012; considers it a positive trend and expects it to continue in the coming years;
B. ker še vedno ni bila podana pozitivna izjava o zanesljivosti, kar lahko spodkoplje legitimnost porabe in politik Unije;
Welcomes the process of administrative modernisation within the Council; regrets, nonetheless, the lack of information on the concrete implementing measures of that process and on the anticipated impact on the Council’s budget; calls on the Council to provide the missing information as soon as possible;
C. ker sta v razmerah, v katerih zaradi gospodarske in finančne krize primanjkuje sredstev, proračunska disciplina in gospodarno ravnanje s sredstvi še toliko pomembnejša;
Wishes to receive more information on the Service Level Agreements established with the EEAS, and not only in respect of the administrative modernisation process;
D. ker je Unija začela izvajati novi večletni finančni okvir 2014–2020 [9];
Calls on the Council to cooperate with other institutions to come up with a unified methodology of presenting the translation costs in order to simplify the analysis and comparison of the costs;
E. ker Komisija v skladu s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) nosi končno odgovornost za izvrševanje proračuna Evropske unije, države članice pa morajo odkrito sodelovati z njo, da se lahko zagotovi takšna uporaba odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, ki bo skladna z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja;
Considers that the Council acted disdainfully towards Parliament by appointing a Member of the Court of Auditors, despite the fact that Parliament gave a negative opinion; urges the Council to pay attention to the opinions expressed by Parliament on the nomination of members of the Court of Auditors and to the declarations of prospective members of the Court of Auditors before they are nominated;
F. ker člen 287 PDEU določa naslednje: „Računsko sodišče predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu izjavo o zanesljivosti poslovnih knjig ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov“;
Reasons of postponement of the decision on granting discharge
G. ker postajajo revizije smotrnosti poslovanja, ki merijo, v kolikšnem obsegu je poraba dosegla zastavljene cilje, čedalje pomembnejše;
Considers that effective supervision of the Union’s budget implementation requires cooperation between Parliament, the European Council, and the Council through a working arrangement;
H. ker bi moralo biti upravljanje Komisije prikazano na odkrit način, skupaj z upravljanjem držav članic, ki so odgovorne v okviru deljenega upravljanja skladov, da bi se povečalo zaupanje javnosti v institucije;
Regrets the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures up to date; points out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council for the implementation of the Council’s budget for the financial years 2009, 2010 and 2011 for the reasons set out in its resolutions of 10 May 2011, 25 October 2011, 10 May 2012 and 23 October 2012, 17 April 2013 and 9 October 2013;
I. ker poročilo o oceni financ Unije (člen 318 PDEU), ki se opira na rezultate, dosežene zlasti v zvezi z opredeljenimi cilji, ponuja priložnost, da se v Komisiji začne spodbujati kultura smotrnosti poslovanja;
Reiterates that it is only possible to implement effective budgetary control with the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, the main elements of which must comprise formal meetings between representatives of the Council and Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control, answering questions asked by the committee’s members on the basis of a written questionnaire and submitting documents to serve as background material for budgetary controls on request; is of the opinion that the fundamental elements of an effective budgetary control is laid down in its resolution of 23 October 2012;
J. ker bo treba v prihodnje Odbor za proračunski nadzor še tesneje vključiti v nadzor nad izdatki Komisije; ker se veseli tesnejšega sodelovanja z Računskim sodiščem pri pripravi vsestranskih predlogov za večjo učinkovitost revizijskih postopkov;
Reiterates that without the cooperation of the Council as stated above, Parliament is not in the position to make an informed decision on granting discharge;
Kmetijska in regionalna politika: pomanjkljivosti pri upravljanju Komisije in držav članic
Emphasises that the Commission, in its reply of 25 November 2011 to the letter from the Chair of the Committee on Budgetary Control, already said that it was desirable for Parliament to continue to give, postpone or refuse discharge to the other institutions – including the Council – as has been the case up until now;
Pismo poročevalca in poročevalcev v senci predsedniku Komisije z dne 5. novembra 2013 in njegov odgovor
Points out that Parliament in its discharge resolution adopted in April 2013 decided to send the Council’s questions to the Commission; notes that the Commission replied by letter of 23 January 2014;
zahteva, da Komisija glede na ponavljajočo se povečano pojavnost napak v nekaj državah članicah odločno prevzame večjo odgovornost za preprečevanje finančnih posledic za proračun Unije;
Fully endorses and supports the Commission’s views in its letter of 23 January 2014 that all institutions are fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by the Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure in full respect of the relevant provisions in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in the relevant secondary law;
opozarja, da se je stopnja napak v proračunskem letu 2012 tretjič zapored povečala;
Informs the Council that the Commission also states in its letter that it will not oversee the implementation of the budgets of the other institutions and that giving a response to questions addressed to another institution would infringe the autonomy of that institution to implement its own section of the budget; reminds the Council that one of the European Council’s conclusions of 18 and 19 October 2012 was that ‘democratic legitimacy and accountability should be further explored’; recalls that Parliament grants discharge to the other institutions after considering the documents provided and the replies given to the questions; regrets that the Parliament repeatedly encounters problems in receiving answers from the Council;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj člen 32(5) nove finančne uredbe (EU, Euratom št. 966/2012) v primeru vztrajno visokih stopenj napak uporablja strožje in ugotovi slabosti v kontrolnih sistemih ter ustrezno ukrepa oziroma predlaga ustrezne ukrepe v zvezi z morebitno poenostavitvijo, nadaljnjo krepitvijo kontrolnih sistemov ter preoblikovanjem programov ali sistemov izvajanja;
Welcomes the efforts of the Greek presidency to reopen the negotiations between the institutions; underlines, however, that such negotiations did not bring expected results in the past;
meni, da je tveganje napak na področjih, na katera se nanaša politika Unije, zlasti na področju deljenega upravljanja, večje, če so s tem povezane politike posebej kompleksne in če države članice niso naklonjene izvajanju ustreznih kontrolnih sistemov in sistemov poročanja; poziva vse ustrezne akterje, vključene v odločanje na ravni Unije, k dodatni poenostavitvi, zlasti s pripravo osnutkov preprostih in preverljivih pravil o upravičenosti, zmanjšanjem birokracije ter pripravo primernih in učinkovitih kontrol;
Considers it desirable for Parliament to exercise its power to grant discharge pursuant to Articles 316, 317 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in line with current interpretation and practice, namely to grant discharge to each heading of the budget individually in order to maintain transparency and democratic accountability towards Union taxpayers;
je seznanjen s tem, da je Komisija v sporočilu o zaščiti proračuna Evropske unije [10] zapisala, da je osem držav članic odgovornih za 90 % finančnih popravkov na področju deljenega upravljanja; zato poziva Komisijo, naj posebno pozornost posveti tem državam;
Recommends organising a workshop focussing on the legal analysis of Parliament’s function of budgetary control and of the Council’s duty to cooperate; recommends the drafting of an own initiative report focussing on possible amendments to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as a way forward in order to prepare for the possibility of instigating legal proceedings, as well as the possibility of a change or clarification of the rules on granting discharge to other institutions stated in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
ugotavlja, da so poročevalec in poročevalci v senci za podelitev razrešnice Komisiji v proračunskem letu 2012 zahtevali, da se državam članicam, katerih sistemi upravljanja in spremljanja kažejo nenehne in sistemske pomanjkljivosti, naložijo strožji finančni popravki;
Regrets that not all the Union institutions respect the same standards in relation to transparency and believes that the Council should make improvements in that regard; is convinced that Parliament and the Council, as joint legislators, should apply the same standards of transparency;
je seznanjen s tem, da je predsednik Komisije v odgovoru napovedal, da bo:
Recalls that good cooperation between the Parliament and the Council is of outmost importance in ensuring a good implementation of the Union budget;
poostril nadzor in kontrole v državah članicah z največjim profilom tveganja z vidika upravljanja in kontrole programov EU;
Calls on the Court of Auditors, therefore, to conduct a thorough audit of the administrative and operational activities of the European Council, the Council, and the European External Action Service, without encroaching on the powers and responsibilities laid down in the Treaties, and to report on the findings to Parliament;
če bo to s pravnega vidika izvedljivo, tudi v prihodnje prekinil plačila in ukinil programe, kadar bodo ugotovljene resne pomanjkljivosti;
Calls on the Court of Auditors to include in its next annual report a review of the follow-up by the European Council and the Council of Parliament’s recommendations in this resolution.
še naprej posredoval potrebne finančne podatke, ki omogočajo temeljito analizo držav članic;
OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p.
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije o zaščiti proračuna Unije, ki tokrat prvič vsebuje pregled razmer na področju finančnih popravkov v posameznih državah članicah, obenem pa poziva k bolj poglobljeni letni analizi razmer v posameznih državah z navedbami, koliko denarja bi bilo dejansko mogoče vrniti v evropski proračun;
1.
pozdravlja nova pravila za programsko obdobje 2014–2020, sprejeta z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom, vključno z ukrepi, kot so imenovanja revizijskih organov in organov za potrjevanje, akreditacije revizijskih organov, pregled revizij in potrjevanje računovodskih izkazov, finančni popravki in neto finančni popravki, sorazmerni nadzor in predhodno pogojevanje, katerih cilj je dodatno prispevati k zmanjšanju stopnje napak; v zvezi s tem podpira čedalje večjo usmerjenost v rezultate in tematsko osredotočenost kohezijske politike, ki bi morali zagotoviti visoko dodano vrednost sofinanciranih dejavnosti; prav tako pozdravlja opredelitev resne pomanjkljivosti in pričakovano višjo stopnjo popravkov ponavljajočih se pomanjkljivosti;
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012, Section III — Commission and executive agencies
pozdravlja dejstvo, da bo v novem programskem obdobju 2014–2020 v primeru resnih pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju kohezijske politike mogoče in treba izvesti neto finančne popravke, ki bodo ostali standard na področju kmetijstva;
having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012 [1],having regard to the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012 (COM(2013) 570 – C7-0273/2013) [2],having regard to the Commission’s report on the follow-up to the discharge for the 2011 financial year (COM(2013) 668), and to the Commission staff working documents accompanying that report (SWD(2013) 348 and SWD(2013) 349),
meni, da so hitro in pravilno uporabljeni neto finančni popravki učinkovito orodje za zaščito proračuna Unije, in meni, da je treba izterjave zneskov in finančne popravke upoštevati v vsaki celoviti oceni splošnega sistema notranjih kontrol; zato poziva Računsko sodišče, naj s Komisijo doseže sporazum o tem, kako vključiti učinek teh korektivnih ukrepov na zaščito proračuna Unije;
having regard to the Commission communication of 5 June 2013 entitled ‘Synthesis of the Commission’s management achievements in 2012’ (COM(2013) 334),
Ocena sporočila
having regard to the Commission’s report on the evaluation of the Union’s finances based on the results achieved (COM(2013) 461), and to the Commission staff working documents accompanying that report (SWD(2013) 228 and SWD(2013) 229),
Kmetijstvo in naravni viri
having regard to the Commission communication on the protection of the European Union budget to end 2012 (COM(2013) 682),
ugotavlja, da so vsi finančni popravki na področju kmetijstva neto popravki; poudarja, da uporaba neto finančnih popravkov na področju kmetijstva še ne prinaša želenega napredka, saj
having regard to the Commission communication on the application of net financial corrections on Member States for Agriculture and Cohesion Policy (COM(2013) 934),
obstoječa notranja indikativna primerjalna merila Komisije že določajo, da postopki preverjanja skladnosti ne smejo trajati dlje kot dve leti, in
having regard to the Commission’s annual report to the discharge authority on internal audits carried out in 2012 (COM(2013) 606), and to the Commission staff working document accompanying that report (SWD(2013) 314),
se v prilogi I k sporočilu navedena „nova“ merila in metode za določanje sorazmernosti finančnih popravkov, ki se uporabijo, nanašajo izključno na smernice, ki bodo temeljile na obstoječih smernicah, ki jih je Komisija sprejela že 23. decembra 1997; je presenečen, da Komisiji skoraj 20 let ni uspelo doseči, da bi bili postopki preverjanja skladnosti krajši od referenčnih vrednosti, ki jih je sama določila; vendar meni, da je treba, da bi postopek preverjanja skladnosti dosegel svoj polni učinek, postopek pospešiti ter še izboljšati merila in metode uporabe finančnih popravkov tako, da bi presegli predvidene nove smernice;
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ Annual Report on the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012, together with the institutions’ replies [3] (Annual Report), and to the Court of Auditors’ special reports,having regard to the statement of assurance [4] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2012 pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 on discharge to be granted to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012 (05848/2014 – C7-0048/2014),
države članice ne posredujejo hitrih, enostavnih in učinkovitih dokazov, da neto finančni popravki, ki jih zahteva Komisija, niso upravičeni, zaradi česar pogosto prihaja do zamud pri obravnavi primerov s popravki;
having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 on discharge to be granted to the executive agencies in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012 (05850/2014 – C7-0049/2014),
Kohezijska politika
having regard to Articles 317, 318 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,
opozarja, da je od številnih dejavnikov odvisno, ali bo novi instrument prinesel več finančnih popravkov in posledično nižjo stopnjo napak v kohezijski politiki; prav tako meni, da možnosti, s katerimi se lahko države članice izognejo neto finančnim popravkom (brez omejitve v zvezi z nadomeščanjem projektov do 15. februarja leta „n + 1“, časovno neomejena možnost naknadne prijave v primeru napak držav članic, dolgotrajni pritožbeni postopki), prinašajo težave;
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], and in particular Articles 55, 145, 146 and 147 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [6], and in particular Articles 62, 164, 165 and 166 thereof,having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes [7], and in particular Article 14(2) and (3) thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions;
poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma predloži predlog o omejitvi ali kar prepovedi nadomeščanja projektov;
having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 [8];having regard to Rule 76 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,
meni, da še ni mogoče oceniti učinkovitosti instrumenta kohezijske politike tudi zato, ker je njegova uporaba odvisna od podrobnosti, sprejetih v delegiranem aktu, ki je napovedan za april 2014;
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the other committees concerned (A7-0242/2014),
prav tako opozarja, da revizijska poročila več držav članic, na katera se med drugim opira Komisija pri pripravi izjave o zanesljivosti, pogosto vsebujejo napake ter podcenjujejo stopnjo tveganja in napake, zato so delno nezanesljiva [12]; opozarja tudi, da je Računsko sodišče pred kratkim potrdilo, da se Evropska komisija ne sme opirati na rezultate revizij, ki so jih države članice opravile v zvezi z regionalno podporo Unije [13];
A. whereas, for the 19th time in succession, the Court of Auditors was unable to grant a positive statement of assurance regarding the legality and regularity of the payments underlying the accounts,
Pridržki Komisije, vzroki za zavezujoče obveznosti
B. whereas the continued absence of a positive statement of assurance risks eroding the legitimacy of Union spending and policies,
spominja, da je Barrosova Komisija leta 2005 nastopila s ciljem, da bi „bilo treba povečati odgovornost s prizadevanjem, da se od Evropskega računskega sodišča dobi pozitivna izjava o zanesljivosti“ [14];
C. whereas, in a situation in which resources are scarce on account of the economic and financial crisis, greater importance attaches to the need to observe budgetary discipline and to use funds economically,
opozarja, da je dobro sodelovanje ključno, zlasti na področju deljenega upravljanja; zato poziva vse ustrezne akterje, vključene v odločanje na ravni Unije, k večji učinkovitosti, zlasti s pripravo osnutkov preprostih in preverljivih pravil o upravičenosti, določitvijo jasnih pravil in postopkov za dostop do sredstev Unije, zmanjšanjem birokracije ter pripravo primernih in stroškovno učinkovitih kontrol;
F. whereas Article 287 TFEU provides: ‘The Court of Auditors shall provide the European Parliament and the Council with a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions (…)’,
zato v skladu s členom 287(3) PDEU poziva k sodelovanju med nacionalnimi revizijskimi institucijami in Računskim sodiščem na področju okrepitve nadzora deljenega upravljanja;
G. whereas performance audits measuring the extent to which spending has achieved the objectives pursued are becoming ever more important,
priznava, da se, kot vedno znova poudarja Komisija, približno 80 % sredstev porabi v okviru deljenega upravljanja; kljub temu opozarja, da člen 317 PDEU določa, da Komisija nosi končno odgovornost za izvrševanje proračuna; kljub temu pričakuje, da bodo države članice v celoti sodelovale pri polni uporabi pravil o dobrem finančnem poslovodenju in kontrolah;