natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
243), incorporated as point 4 into Annex XVI (Procurement) to the EEA Agreement by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 68/2006 of 2.6.2006 (OJ L 245, 7.9.2006, p.
Glej Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 734/2013 z dne 22. julija 2013 (UL L 204, 31.7.2013, str. 15), ki še ni vključena v Sporazum EGP, in člen 6 dela II Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
22 and EEA Supplement No 44, 7.9.2006, p.
Pojem „statistična regija“ se v zadevnih smernicah Komisije uporablja namesto kratice „NUTS“.
18).
Kratica NUTS izhaja iz naslova „Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics“ (nomenklatura statističnih teritorialnih enot) v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1059/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. maja 2003 o oblikovanju skupne klasifikacije statističnih teritorialnih enot (nuts) (UL L 154, 21.6.2003, str. 1).
Likewise, in the case of a restricted procedure within the meaning of respectively Articles 28 of Directive 2014/24/EU and 46 of Directive 2014/25/EU, the Authority will also consider that no State aid is awarded to undertakings, unless interested providers are prevented from tendering without valid reasons.
Ta uredba še ni bila vključena v Sporazum EGP.
This will also be the case where public purchasers procure innovative solutions resulting from a preceding R & D procurement, or non-R & D products and services that are to be delivered to a performance level requiring a product, process or organisational innovation.
Vendar so se Statistični urad Evropske unije, Eurostat, nacionalni inštituti držav kandidatk in Efta dogovorili, da se statistične regije za dosego enotne opredelitve pojmov zaradi vse večje potrebe po statističnih podatkih na regionalni ravni določijo podobno kot pri klasifikaciji NUTS.
Without prejudice to procedures that cover both the development and the subsequent purchase of unique or specialised products or services.
V primeru nezakonite pomoči bodo morale države Efte zagotoviti naknadno objavo istih informacij najpozneje šest mesecev po datumu odločbe Nadzornega organa.
See for instance Case C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 78 and Case C-333/07 Régie Networks v Rhone Alpes Bourgogne [2008] ECR I-10807, paragraphs 94-116.
Te informacije bi morale biti na voljo v obliki, ki omogoča iskanje, izpis in enostavno objavo na spletu, na primer v formatu CSV ali XML.
See Case C-225/91 Matra v Commission [1993] ECR I-3203, paragraph 42.
Tako skupno metodologijo lahko zagotovi Nadzorni organ.
See footnote 7.
Glej http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/legal-framework/state-aid-guidelines/.
Joined Cases C-630/11 P to C-633/11 P HGA and Others v Commission.EU:C:2013:387.
Zato je Komisija določila krovni cilj, po katerem bi bilo treba v R in R do leta 2020 vložiti 3 % bruto domačega proizvoda Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: BDP).
If the aid application is for an R & D project, this does not exclude that the potential beneficiary would have already carried out feasibility studies which are not covered by the request for aid.
Da bi se pospešil napredek na področju R&R&I, je v strategiji Evropa 2020 zlasti poudarjena vodilna pobuda „Unija inovacij“ [4], katere namen je izboljšanje okvirnih pogojev in dostopa do financiranja raziskav in inovacij, da bi lahko inovativne zamisli pretvorili v proizvode in storitve, ki ustvarjajo rast in delovna mesta [5].
In the case of aid for projects or activities that are carried out in successive phases which may be subject to separate aid awarding procedures, this means that start of works must not take place before the first aid application.
sta javno financiranje in kakršna koli prednost, pridobljena s takšnim financiranjem, merljiva in dokazljiva ter če obstaja ustrezen mehanizem, ki zagotavlja, da se v celoti preneseta na končne prejemnike, na primer na podlagi znižanih cen;
In the case of aid awarded under an automatic fiscal aid scheme, such scheme must have been adopted and entered into force before any work on the aided project or activity starts.
raziskovalna organizacija ali raziskovalna infrastruktura zagotovi svoje raziskovalne storitve ali pogodbene raziskave po tržni ceni [25];
Even though this may not be possible ex ante for a newly introduced measure, EFTA States will be expected to provide evaluation studies on the incentive effect of their own fiscal aid schemes (so that planned or intended methodologies for ex post evaluations should normally be part of the design of such measures).
udeležena podjetja nosijo celotne stroške projekta;
In the absence of any evaluation studies, the incentive effect of fiscal aid schemes may be presumed only for incremental measures.
rezultati sodelovanja, iz katerih ne izhajajo pravice intelektualne lastnine, se lahko splošno razširjajo in katere koli pravice intelektualne lastnine, ki izhajajo iz dejavnosti raziskovalnih organizacij ali raziskovalnih infrastruktur, se lahko v celoti dodelijo navedenim subjektom;
The net present value of a project is the difference between the positive and negative cash flows over the lifetime of the investment, discounted to their current value (using the cost of capital).
katere koli pravice intelektualne lastnine, ki izhajajo iz projekta, ter s tem povezane pravice dostopa, se sodelujočim partnerjem dodelijo tako, da ustrezno izražajo njihove delovne sklope, prispevke in interese;
The IRR is not based on accounting earnings in a given year, but takes into account the stream of future cash flows that the investor expects to receive over the entire lifetime of the investment.
znesek nadomestila je bil določen na podlagi odprtega, preglednega in nediskriminatornega konkurenčnega prodajnega postopka;
It is defined as the discount rate for which the NPV of a stream of cash flows equals zero.
neodvisna strokovna cenitev potrjuje, da je znesek nadomestila najmanj enak tržni ceni;
This qualification does not necessarily need to follow a chronological approach, moving sequentially over time from fundamental research to activities closer to the market.
raziskovalna organizacija ali raziskovalna infrastruktura lahko kot prodajalec dokaže, da se je o nadomestilu učinkovito pogajala na podlagi običajnih tržnih pogojev, da bi pridobila največjo mogočo gospodarsko korist v času, ko je pogodba sklenjena, pri tem pa je upoštevala svoje zakonsko določene cilje;
Accordingly, nothing will prevent the Authority from classifying a task which is carried out at a later stage of a project as industrial research, while finding that an activity carried out at an earlier stage constitutes experimental development or is not research at all.
velikosti upravičenca, ki se uporablja kot približek za večje težave, s katerimi se običajno spopadajo manjša podjetja pri financiranju tveganega projekta, ter (iii) resnost nedelovanja trga, kot so pričakovani zunanji učinki glede razširjanja znanja.
‘The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development’, Frascati Manual, OECD, 2002, as amended or replaced.
zadeva C-109/92, Wirth, Recueil 1993, str.
For practical purposes, and unless it is shown that a different scale should be used in individual cases, the different R & D categories can also be considered to correspond to Technology Readiness Levels 1 (fundamental research), 2-4 (industrial research) and 5-8 (experimental development) — see communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions, ‘A European strategy for Key Enabling Technologies — A bridge to growth and jobs’, COM(2012) 341 final of 26.6.2012.
I-06447, točka 15;
Without prejudice to specific provisions applying to aid for research and development in the agricultural and fisheries sectors, as laid down in a block exemption Regulation.
in sodba Sodišča Efte z dne 21. februarja 2008 v zadevi E-5/07, Private Barnehagers Landsforbund, Poročilo Sodišča Efte [2008], str. 62.
32 and EEA Supplement No 23, 21.4.2011, p. 1).
Za davčne ukrepe se lahko informacije o zneskih individualne pomoči navedejo v naslednjih razponih (v milijonih EUR):
See Council Regulation (EU) No 734/2013 of 22 July 2013 (OJ L 204, 31.7.2013, p.
[10–30];
15), not yet incorporated into the EEA Agreement and Article 6 of Part II of the Agreement on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice.
[30 in več].
The term ‘Statistical region’ is used instead of the acronym ‘NUTS’ in the corresponding Commission Guidelines.
naročilo nobenemu udeleženemu ponudniku ne zagotavlja nobene prednostne obravnave pri dobavi komercialnih količin končnih proizvodov ali storitev javnemu naročniku v zadevni državi Efte [30] in
NUTS is derived from the title ‘Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics’ according to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26.5.2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) (OJ L 154, 21.6.2003, p.
http://www.efta.int/eea/eu-programmes.
1).
http://www.eftasurv.int/media/decisions/195-04-COL.pdf.
This regulation has not been incorporated into the EEA Agreement.
http://www.efta.int/eea/policy-areas/flanking-horizontal-policies/research-innovation.
No 273/14/COL
št. 273/14/COL
on the financing of Scandinavian Airlines through the new Revolving Credit Facility (Norway) [2015/2023]
o financiranju družbe Scandinavian Airlines z novim revolving kreditom (Norveška) [2015/2023]
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), in particular to Articles 61, 109, and Protocols 26 and 27,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) ter zlasti členov 61 in 109 ter Protokolov 26 in 27 k Sporazumu,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (‘the Surveillance and Court Agreement’), in particular to Article 24,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču) in zlasti člena 24 Sporazuma,
HAVING REGARD to Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement (‘Protocol 3’), in particular to Article 1(2) of Part I and Article 7(2) of Part II,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol 3) ter zlasti člena 1(2) dela I in člena 7(2) dela II Protokola,
In late October 2012, the Authority and the European Commission (‘the Commission’) were informally contacted by Norway, Denmark and Sweden (jointly ‘the States’) in relation to their intention to participate in a new Revolving Credit Facility (‘the new RCF’) in favour of Scandinavian Airlines (‘SAS’ or ‘the SAS Group’ or ‘the company’).
Konec oktobra 2012 so Norveška, Danska in Švedska (v nadaljnjem besedilu: države) neformalno obvestile Nadzorni organ in Evropsko komisijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija), da nameravajo sodelovati pri novem revolving kreditu v korist družbe Scandinavian Airlines (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba SAS).
On 12 November 2012, the States decided to participate in the new RCF without however formally notifying the measure to the Authority.
Države so se 12. novembra 2012 odločile za sodelovanje pri novem revolving kreditu, ne da bi ukrep formalno priglasile Nadzornemu organu.
On 5 February 2013, the Authority received a complaint from the European Low Fares Airline Association (‘ELFAA’) against the participation of the States in the RCF.
Nadzorni organ je 5. februarja 2013 prejel pritožbo od Združenja evropskih nizkocenovnih letalskih prevoznikov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ELFAA) proti sodelovanju držav pri revolving kreditu.
With a letter dated 18 February 2013, the Authority invited the Norwegian authorities to submit their comments on the complaint and on the allegations of unlawful State aid.
V dopisu z dne 18. februarja 2013 je Nadzorni organ norveške organe pozval, naj predložijo pripombe na pritožbo in o domnevni nezakoniti državni pomoči.
They also provided additional information by way of a letter dated 6 June 2013.
Odločba o začetku postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije [1].
By Decision No 259/13/COL of 19 June 2013, the Authority opened the formal investigation into potentially unlawful aid to SAS through the new RCF (‘the opening decision’).
Norveški organi, družba SAS in družba Foundation Asset Management Sweden AB (v nadaljnjem besedilu: FAM) [2] so predložili pripombe na odločbo o začetku postopka.
The opening decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement to it [1].
Nadzorni organ je 6. novembra 2013 opažanja, ki jih je prejel od družb SAS in FAM, posredoval norveškim organom in jim dal možnost odgovora.
The Norwegian authorities, the SAS Group and the Foundation Asset Management Sweden AB (‘FAM’) [2] submitted comments on the opening decision.
V dopisu z dne 6. decembra 2013 so norveški organi sporočili, da nimajo pripomb na opažanja družb SAS in FAM.
On 6 November 2013, the Authority forwarded the observations received from the SAS Group and FAM to the Norwegian authorities which were given the opportunity to react.
Nadzorni organ je z dopisom z dne 25. februarja 2014 od norveških organov zahteval dodatne informacije.
In a letter dated 6 December 2013, the Norwegian authorities noted that they had no comments on the observations of the SAS Group and FAM.
Norveški organi so te informacije poslali v dopisu z dne 27. marca 2014.
By letter dated 25 February 2014, the Authority requested further information from the Norwegian authorities.
V dopisu z dne 6. marca 2014 so norveški organi obvestili Nadzorni organ, da je družba SAS sklenila, da razveljavi novi revolving kredit in razišče alternativne možnosti za povečanje svoje kapitalske osnove.
This information was sent by letter dated 27 March 2014.
Razveljavitev je začela učinkovati 4. marca 2014.
By letter dated 6 March 2014, the Norwegian authorities informed the Authority that SAS had decided to cancel the new RCF and investigate alternative possibilities to strengthen its capital base.
Nadzorni organ ima za ta postopek v skladu s členom 109(1) Sporazuma EGP v povezavi s členom 24 Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču pristojnost, da oceni, ali je Norveška spoštovala določbe Sporazuma EGP.
The cancellation was effective from 4 March 2014.
Po drugi strani je Komisija pristojna le za to, da oceni, ali sta Danska in Švedska spoštovali določbe Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU).
For this procedure, the Authority, pursuant to Article 109(1) of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘EEA Agreement’) in conjunction with Article 24 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, is competent to assess whether the provisions of the EEA Agreement have been complied with by Norway.
Za zagotavljanje enotne uporabe na celotnem območju EGP Nadzorni organ in Komisija na podlagi člena 109(2) in Protokola 27 k Sporazumu EGP medsebojno sodelujeta, si izmenjujeta informacije in se posvetujeta o vprašanjih politike nadzora in posameznih primerih.
On the other hand, the Commission is solely competent to assess whether the provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) have been respected by Denmark and Sweden.
Glede na navedeno in glede na vzporedno pristojnost obeh institucij v tej zadevi je Nadzorni organ pred sprejetjem te odločbe sodeloval s Komisijo in se z njo posvetoval.
Also, on the basis of Article 109(2) and Protocol 27 to the EEA Agreement, in order to ensure a uniform application throughout the EEA, the Authority and the Commission shall cooperate, exchange information and consult each other on surveillance policy issues and individual cases.
SKANDINAVSKI TRG ZA ZRAČNI PROMET
In the light of the above and given the parallel competence of both institutions in the present case, the Authority has cooperated and consulted with the Commission before adopting the present decision.
Med letoma 2001 in 2011 naj bi se skandinavski trg za zračni promet povečal za 126 %, izračunano na podlagi razpoložljivih sedež kilometrov [3].
THE SCANDINAVIAN AIR TRANSPORT MARKET
Skoraj celotno rast na skandinavskem trgu letov na kratke razdalje so dosegli nizkocenovni letalski prevozniki, zlasti družbi Norwegian Air Shuttle in Ryanair.
Between 2001 and 2011, the Scandinavian air transport market (encompassing Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Norway) reportedly grew by 126 % in ASK [3] terms.
Dejansko se ocenjuje, da so nizkocenovni letalski prevozniki ustvarili 90 % rasti v tem obdobju [4].
Almost all of the growth in the short-haul Scandinavian market came from low-cost carriers, in particular Norwegian Air Shuttle and Ryanair.
Kljub povečanemu pomenu nizkocenovnih letalskih prevoznikov je največji akter na skandinavskem trgu še vedno družba SAS, ki je imela po ocenah v letu 2011 35,6-odstotni tržni delež, potem ko je imela pred desetletjem več kot 50-odstotni tržni delež.
Indeed, it is estimated that low-cost carriers generated 90 % of the growth in that period [4].
Tržni delež družbe Norwegian Air Shuttle v letu 2011 je znašal 18,7 %, družbe Ryanair pa 6,8 %.
Despite the increase in the importance of low-cost carriers, the largest player in the Scandinavian market is still SAS, with an estimated market share in 2011 of 35,6 %, far from the highs above 50 % enjoyed a decade ago.
UPRAVIČENEC
The market shares of Norwegian Air Shuttle and Ryanair reached 18,7 % and 6,8 % respectively in that year.
Družba SAS je domači letalski prevoznik v državah, največji letalski prevoznik v Skandinaviji in osmi največji letalski prevoznik v Evropi.
THE BENEFICIARY
Je tudi ustanovni član letalskega združenja Star Alliance.
SAS is the flag carrier of the States, the largest airline in Scandinavia and the eighth-largest airline in Europe.
Skupina letalskih prevoznikov, ki zajema družbe Scandinavian Airlines, Widerøe [5] in Blue1, ima sedež v Stockholmu, njeno glavno evropsko in medcelinsko vozlišče pa je københavnsko letališče.
It is also a founding member of the Star Alliance.
Leta 2013 je družba SAS prevozila 28 milijonov potnikov, njeni prihodki pa so znašali okoli 42 milijard švedskih kron (SEK).
The airline group, which includes Scandinavian Airlines, Widerøe [5] and Blue1, is headquartered in Stockholm with its main European and intercontinental hub at Copenhagen Airport.
Družba SAS je trenutno v 50-odstotni lasti držav.
In 2013, SAS carried around 28 million passengers, achieving revenues of around SEK 42 billion.
Švedska ima v lasti 21,4-odstotni delež, Danska 14,3-odstotni delež in Norveška 14,3-odstotni delež.
SAS is currently 50 % owned by the States: 21,4 % by Sweden, 14,3 % by Denmark, and 14,3 % by Norway.
Glavni zasebni delničar je fundacija Knut and Alice Wallenberg (v nadaljnjem besedilu: fundacija KAW) s 7,6-odstotnim deležem, preostali delničarji pa imajo v lasti delež v višini 1,5 % ali manj.
The main private shareholder is the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (‘KAW’) (7,6 %), while the remaining shareholders own stakes of 1,5 % or less.
Preglednica 1
Table 1
Glavni delničarji družbe SAS na dan 31. marca 2012 [6]Delničar
Principal shareholders in SAS AB on 31 March 2012 [6]Shareholder
Skupaj (%)
Total (%)
Švedska vlada
The Swedish Government
Danska vlada
The Danish Government
Norveška vlada
The Norwegian Government
Fundacija Knut in Alice Wallenberg
Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
Finančno stanje družbe SAS je že nekaj let šibko, s ponavljajočimi se izgubami med letoma 2008 in 2013.
The financial position of SAS has been weak for several years, with recurring losses between 2008 and 2013.
Novembra 2012 ji je bonitetna agencija Standard and Poor's (v nadaljnjem besedilu: agencija S&P) znižala bonitetno oceno z B– na CCC+ [7].
In November 2012, Standard and Poor's (‘S&P’) downgraded its credit rating for the company from B– to CCC+ [7].
Te težave je dodatno okrepilo tržno okolje z visokimi cenami goriva in negotovim povpraševanjem.
These difficulties were heightened by the market environment of high fuel costs and uncertain demand.
Iz letnih poročil družbe je mogoče sklepati, da je zlasti med letoma 2008 in 2012 družba SAS vsako leto ustvarila velike izgube in zabeležila znatne vsote neto finančnega dolga.
In particular, it results from the annual reports of the company that, between 2008 and 2012, SAS incurred substantial losses every year and registered significant amounts of financial net debt.
Preglednica 2
Table 2
Ključni finančni podatki družbe SAS za obdobje 2007–2012 (v milijonih SEK) [8]
SAS' key financial data 2007-12 (SEK million) [8]
(jan.–okt.)
(Jan-Oct)
Prihodki
Revenue
Neto finančni dolg
Financial net debt
EBT (dobiček pred obdavčitvijo)
EBT
Čisti dobiček
Net income
Denarni tok za dano leto
Cash flow for the year
Donosnost vloženega kapitala (ROCE) – v %
Return on capital employed (ROCE) — %
Donosnost lastniškega kapitala po obdavčitvi – v %
Return on book equity after tax — %
Razmerje pokritja obresti – v %
Interest coverage ratio — %
Zaradi poslabšanja finančnega stanja je družba SAS v letih 2009 in 2010 upoštevala program za bistveno zmanjšanje stroškov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Core SAS).
As a result of its deteriorating financial position, SAS followed a substantial cost reduction program (‘Core SAS’) in 2009/10.
Pri izvajanju tega programa je morala zbrati lastniški kapital od svojih delničarjev z dvema novima izdajama delnic družbe SAS s pravico prednostnega nakupa za obstoječe delničarje (i) 6 milijard SEK v aprilu 2009 in (ii) 5 milijard SEK v maju 2010 [9].
In implementing that program, SAS had to raise equity from its shareholders by way of two rights issues: (i) SEK 6 billion in April 2009; and (ii) SEK 5 billion in May 2010 [9].
Finančne težave družbe SAS so dosegle vrhunec v letu 2012, ko je družba predstavila poslovni načrt 4 Excellence Next Generation (v nadaljnjem besedilu: poslovni načrt 4XNG), ki ga je vodstvo družbe dojemalo kot „zadnji poziv“ za družbo SAS [10].
The financial difficulties of SAS reached a peak in 2012, when the company presented the 4 Excellence Next Generation business plan (‘4XNG plan’), perceived by the management of the airline as the ‘final call’ for SAS [10].
Poleg tega so novembra 2012 mediji poročali o možnosti stečaja družbe SAS [11].
In addition, in November 2012 the press reported the possibility of SAS going into bankruptcy [11].
OPIS UKREPA: NOVI REVOLVING KREDIT V LETU 2012
DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE: THE NEW RCF IN 2012
Kot drugi letalski prevozniki po svetu se je družba SAS opirala na zunanje kredite, da je vzdrževala najnižjo raven likvidnosti.
As for other airlines globally, SAS has relied on external credit facilities to maintain a minimum level of liquidity.
Od 20. decembra 2006 naprej se je družba SAS opirala na revolving kredit z rokom izteka junija 2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: stari revolving kredit).
From 20 December 2006, SAS relied on a RCF that was due to expire in June 2013 (‘the old RCF’).
Stari revolving kredit je znašal 366 milijonov EUR in na izključni osnovi so ga zagotavljale številne banke […].
The old RCF amounted to EUR 366 million and was exclusively provided by a number of banks […].
Vključeval je tudi številne finančne zaveze ali pogoje, […].
It also included a number of financial covenants or conditions, […].
Decembra 2011 se je zaradi poslabšanja poslovanja vodstvo družbe SAS odločilo, da popolnoma izčrpa stari revolving kredit.
In December 2011, as a result of the deterioration in the company's business performance, SAS management decided to draw the old RCF in full.
Potem ko je januarja 2012 hčerinska družba družbe SAS (družba Spanair) vložila zahtevo za stečaj, je družba SAS začela pogajanja z bankami in z njimi 15. marca 2012 dosegla sporazum, da na novo opredelijo finančne zaveze.
Following an application for bankruptcy by a subsidiary of SAS (namely Spanair) in January 2012, SAS entered into negotiations with the banks and reached an agreement for a covenant reset on 15 March 2012.
Ta nova opredelitev finančnih zavez je povečala strošek črpanja starega revolving kredita, zaostrila pogoje črpanja in od družbe SAS zahtevala, da v celoti in takoj povrne izčrpani znesek.