natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In light of this objective and the considerations above, the Authority adopts a Recommendation aligned to the Recommendation 2014/710/EU in order to ensure a uniform application of the common regulatory framework and legal certainty for stakeholders within the electronic communications markets in the EEA.
Zaradi tega cilja in navedenih premislekov Nadzorni organ sprejme priporočilo, ki je usklajeno s Priporočilom 2014/710/EU, da se zainteresiranim stranem na trgih elektronskih komunikacij v EGP zagotovi enotna uporaba skupnega regulativnega okvira in pravne varnosti.
The Framework Directive establishes a legislative framework for the electronic communications sector that seeks, inter alia, to respond to convergence trends by covering all electronic communications networks and services within its scope.
Okvirna direktiva določa zakonodajni okvir za sektor elektronskih komunikacij, katerega namen je med drugim odgovoriti na trende zbliževanja tako, da s svojim področjem uporabe zajema vsa elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve.
The aim of the regulatory framework is, inter alia, to reduce ex ante sector-specific regulation progressively as competition in markets develops and, ultimately, for electronic communications to be governed by competition law only.
Cilj regulativnega okvira je med drugim, da se z razvojem konkurence na trgu postopno odpravijo predhodne posebne ureditve, ki veljajo za sektor, tako da bi elektronske komunikacije nazadnje urejalo le konkurenčno pravo.
Article 15 of the Framework Directive provides that the Authority shall, after public consultation and consultation with the national regulatory authorities (‘NRAs’) in the EFTA States, adopt a recommendation on relevant product and service markets.
Člen 15 okvirne direktive določa, da Nadzorni organ po javni razpravi in posvetovanju z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi v državah Efte sprejme priporočilo o upoštevnih trgih izdelkov in storitev.
In line with this aim, the purpose of this Recommendation is to identify those product and service markets in which ex ante regulation may be warranted in accordance with Article 15(1) of the Framework Directive.
V skladu s tem ciljem je namen tega priporočila opredeliti tiste trge proizvodov in storitev, za katere je lahko v skladu s členom 15(1) okvirne direktive upravičeno predhodno urejanje.
The objective of any ex ante regulatory intervention is ultimately to produce benefits for end-users by making retail markets effectively competitive on a sustainable basis.
Cilj vsakega predhodnega regulativnega posredovanja je nazadnje ustvariti koristi za končne uporabnike z doseganjem učinkovite in trajne konkurenčnosti maloprodajnih trgov.
It is likely that NRAs will gradually be able to find retail markets to be competitive even in the absence of wholesale regulation, especially taking into account expected improvements in innovation and competition.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bodo verjetno postopoma ugotovili, da so lahko maloprodajni trgi konkurenčni tudi brez ureditve na veleprodajni ravni, zlasti glede na pričakovana izboljšanja na področju inovacij in konkurence.
The definition of relevant markets may change over time as the characteristics of products and services may evolve and the possibilities for demand and supply substitution may change.
Opredelitev upoštevnih trgov se lahko sčasoma spremeni zaradi razvoja značilnosti proizvodov in storitev ter spreminjanja možnosti za nadomestitev povpraševanja in ponudbe.
With the Authority's 2008 Recommendation having been in force for more than 7 years, it is now appropriate to revise it on the basis of market developments that have occurred since its adoption.
Priporočilo Nadzornega organa iz leta 2008 velja že več kot sedem let, zato ga je zdaj primerno pregledati glede na razvoj trga od njegovega sprejetja.
Hence, this Recommendation replaces the Authority's 2008 Recommendation and provides guidance to NRAs for forthcoming market reviews.
Zato to priporočilo nadomešča priporočilo Nadzornega organa iz leta 2008 ter nacionalnim regulativnim organom zagotavlja smernice za prihodnje preglede trga.
Article 15(1) of the Framework Directive requires the Authority to identify markets within the electronic communications sector the characteristics of which may be such as to justify the imposition of regulatory obligations in accordance with the principles of competition law.
V skladu s členom 15(1) okvirne direktive mora Nadzorni organ trge v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij, katerih značilnosti lahko utemeljujejo uvedbo regulativnih obveznosti, opredeliti v skladu z načeli konkurenčnega prava.
Competition law principles are therefore used in this Recommendation to define product markets in the electronic communications sector.
Načela konkurenčnega prava se torej v tem priporočilu uporabljajo za opredelitev proizvodnih trgov v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij.
In accordance with Article 15(3) of the Framework Directive, it is for NRAs to define, in accordance with competition law and taking the utmost account of this Recommendation, relevant markets appropriate to national circumstances, in particular relevant geographic markets within their territory.
V skladu s členom 15(3) okvirne direktive nacionalni regulativni organi skladno s konkurenčnim pravom in ob popolnem upoštevanju tega priporočila opredelijo upoštevne trge glede na razmere v državi, zlasti upoštevne geografske trge na svojem ozemlju.
In accordance with Article 16(3) of the Framework Directive, ex ante regulatory obligations are only imposed in markets that are not effectively competitive.
V skladu s členom 16(3) okvirne direktive se predhodne regulativne obveznosti uvedejo le na trgih, na katerih ne vlada dejanska konkurenca.
As explained in recital 27 of the Directive, these are markets where there are one or more undertakings with significant market power (‘SMP’) and where national and EEA competition law remedies alone are not sufficient to address the competition problem identified.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 27 Direktive, so to trgi, na katerih je eno ali več podjetij s pomembno tržno močjo, pravna sredstva nacionalne zakonodaje in zakonodaje EGP na področju konkurence pa ne zadostujejo za reševanje težave, ugotovljene v zvezi s konkurenco.
Furthermore, an analysis of effective competition should include an analysis as to whether the market is prospectively competitive, and thus whether any lack of effective competition is durable.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pri analizi učinkovite konkurence proučiti, ali je trg potencialno konkurenčen, in s tem tudi, ali je pomanjkanje učinkovite konkurence trajno.
For both the Authority and the NRAs the starting point for the identification of wholesale markets susceptible to ex ante regulation is the analysis of corresponding retail markets.
Izhodišče za opredelitev veleprodajnih trgov, ki so lahko predmet predhodnega urejanja, je za Nadzorni organ in nacionalne regulativne organe analiza ustreznih maloprodajnih trgov.
This retail analysis is done by taking into account demand-side and, where appropriate, supply-side substitutability from a forward-looking perspective over a given time horizon.
Analizo maloprodajnih trgov je treba izvesti glede na pričakovani prihodnji razvoj v danem časovnem okviru, ob upoštevanju nadomestljivosti pri povpraševanju, in kadar je ustrezno, pri ponudbi.
When defining relevant markets in accordance with Article 15(3) of the Framework Directive, NRAs should identify a geographic area where the conditions of competition are similar or sufficiently homogeneous and which can be distinguished from neighbouring areas in which the prevailing conditions of competition are appreciably different, having particular regard to the question whether the potential SMP operator acts uniformly across its network area or whether it faces appreciably different conditions of competition to a degree that its activities are constrained in some areas but not in others.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali pri opredelitvi upoštevnih trgov v skladu s členom 15(3) okvirne direktive določiti geografsko območje, na katerem so konkurenčni pogoji podobni ali dovolj homogeni in ki se lahko razlikuje od sosednjih območij, na katerih so prevladujoči konkurenčni pogoji občutno drugačni, pri čemer morajo zlasti upoštevati vprašanje, ali potencialni operater s pomembno tržno močjo deluje enotno v celotnem omrežju ali pa se srečuje z občutno drugačnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji, zaradi katerih so njegove dejavnosti na nekaterih območjih omejene, na drugih pa ne.
It should be assessed whether retail markets are effectively competitive from a forward-looking perspective in the absence of regulation based on a finding of SMP.
Oceniti bi bilo treba, ali so maloprodajni trgi glede na pričakovani prihodnji razvoj učinkovito konkurenčni brez ureditve na podlagi ugotovitve pomembne tržne moči.
On the other hand, the analysis should take into account the effects of other types of regulation applicable to the relevant retail and related wholesale market(s) throughout the relevant period.
Po drugi strani pa bi bilo treba pri analizi upoštevati učinke drugih vrst ureditve, ki se uporabljajo za upoštevni maloprodajni in povezane veleprodajne trge, v celotnem zadevnem obdobju.
When carrying out a market analysis under Article 16 of the Framework Directive, the assessment of a market should be done from a forward-looking perspective, starting from existing market conditions.
Pri izvajanju analize trga v skladu s členom 16 okvirne direktive bi bilo treba trg oceniti glede na pričakovani prihodnji razvoj na podlagi sedanjih razmer na trgu.
The analysis should assess whether the market is prospectively competitive and whether any lack of competition is durable, by taking into account expected or foreseeable market developments [7].
Pri analizi bi bilo treba oceniti, ali je trg potencialno konkurenčen in ali je zato kakršno koli pomanjkanje učinkovite konkurence trajno, tako da se upošteva pričakovani ali predvideni razvoj trga [7].
If the retail market concerned is not effectively competitive from a forward-looking perspective in the absence of ex ante regulation, the corresponding wholesale market(s) susceptible to ex ante regulation in line with Article 16 of the Framework Directive should be assessed.
Če upoštevni maloprodajni trg glede na pričakovani prihodnji razvoj ni učinkovito konkurenčen brez predhodne ureditve, bi bilo treba oceniti ustrezne veleprodajne trge, ki so lahko predmet predhodnega urejanja v skladu s členom 16 okvirne direktive.
When analysing the boundaries and market power within (a) corresponding relevant wholesale market(s) to determine whether it is/they are effectively competitive, direct and indirect competitive constraints should be taken into account, irrespective of whether these constraints result from electronic communications networks, electronic communications services or other types of services or applications that are comparable from the end-users' perspective [8].
Pri analizi meja in tržne moči na ustreznih veleprodajnih trgih bi bilo treba za določitev, ali so ti trgi učinkovito konkurenčni, upoštevati neposredne in posredne konkurenčne omejitve ne glede na to, ali te omejitve izhajajo iz elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev ali drugih vrst storitev ali programov, ki so primerljivi z vidika končnih uporabnikov [8].
On the other hand, if the retail market concerned is effectively competitive from a forward-looking perspective in the absence of ex ante wholesale regulation on the corresponding relevant market(s), this should lead the NRA to conclude that regulation is no longer needed at wholesale level.
Če pa je zadevni maloprodajni trg glede na pričakovani prihodnji razvoj učinkovito konkurenčen brez predhodne ureditve na veleprodajni ravni na ustreznih veleprodajnih trgih, bi moral nacionalni regulativni organ skleniti, da ureditev na veleprodajni ravni ni več potrebna.
In such a case, the corresponding relevant wholesale market(s) should be assessed with a view to withdrawing ex ante regulation.
V takem primeru bi bilo treba oceniti, ali bi bilo treba za ustrezne upoštevne veleprodajne trge odpraviti predhodno ureditev.
Where wholesale markets are vertically linked in the supply chain, the wholesale market to be analysed first is the one that is most upstream from the retail market in question.
Kadar so veleprodajni trgi v prodajni verigi vertikalno povezani, je treba najprej analizirati veleprodajni trg, ki je v primerjavi z zadevnim maloprodajnim trgom višje v prodajni verigi.
The wholesale markets listed in the Annex may have such characteristics as to justify ex ante regulation because overall they meet the following three cumulative criteria, which have also been used to identify markets susceptible to ex ante regulation in the previous versions of the Recommendation.
Veleprodajni trgi, navedeni v Prilogi, imajo lahko značilnosti, ki lahko utemeljujejo predhodno urejanje, ker na splošno izpolnjujejo naslednja tri kumulativna merila, ki so se v prejšnjih različicah priporočila uporabljala tudi za opredelitev trgov, ki so lahko predmet predhodnega urejanja.
However, given the dynamic character and functioning of electronic communications markets, possibilities to overcome barriers to entry within the relevant time horizon should also be taken into consideration when carrying out a prospective analysis to identify the relevant markets for possible ex ante regulation.
Vendar bi bilo treba glede na dinamičen značaj in delovanje trgov elektronskih komunikacij pri analizi prihodnjih razmer za opredelitev upoštevnih trgov, ki bi lahko bili predmet predhodnega urejanja, upoštevati tudi možnosti premagovanja ovir za vstop na trg v ustreznem časovnem okviru.
The second criterion addresses whether a market structure tends towards effective competition within a relevant time horizon.
Drugo merilo obravnava vprašanje, ali se tržna struktura nagiba k učinkoviti konkurenci v ustreznem časovnem okviru.
The application of this criterion involves examining the state of infrastructure-based and other competition behind the barriers to entry.
Uporaba tega merila vključuje pregled stanja infrastrukturne in druge konkurence za ovirami za vstop.
The third criterion is that the application of competition law alone would not adequately address the market failure(s) concerned.
Tretje merilo je, da zgolj uporaba konkurenčnega prava ne bi zadostovala za ustrezen odziv na zadevne tržne pomanjkljivosti.
The main indicators to be considered when assessing the first and second criteria are similar to those examined as part of a forward-looking market analysis to determine the presence of SMP.
Glavni kazalniki, ki se upoštevajo pri ocenjevanju prvega in drugega merila, so podobni tistim, ki se preverijo kot del analize prihodnjih razmer na trgu za določitev prisotnosti pomembne tržne moči.
In particular, indicators of barriers to entry in the absence of regulation (including the extent of sunk costs), market structure, market performance and market dynamics, including indicators such as market shares and trends, market prices and trends, and the extent and coverage of competing networks or infrastructures.
Upoštevajo se zlasti kazalniki ovir za vstop ob odsotnosti pravne ureditve (vključno z obsegom nepovratnih stroškov), tržna struktura, delovanje trga in tržna dinamika, vključno s kazalniki, kot so tržni deleži in gibanja, tržne cene in gibanja ter obseg in pokritost konkurenčnih omrežij ali infrastruktur.
As far as the first criterion is concerned, two types of barriers to entry are relevant for the purpose of this Recommendation: structural barriers and legal or regulatory barriers.
V zvezi s prvim merilom sta za to priporočilo pomembni dve vrsti ovir za vstop: strukturne in pravne ali regulativne ovire.
Structural barriers to entry result from original cost or demand conditions that create asymmetric conditions between incumbents and new entrants impeding or preventing market entry of the latter.
Strukturne ovire za vstop izvirajo iz prvotnih značilnosti na ravni stroškov ali povpraševanja, ki ustvarjajo nesorazmerne pogoje med prvotnimi ponudniki in novimi ponudniki ter ovirajo ali preprečujejo vstop slednjih na trg.
For instance, high structural barriers may be found to exist when the market is characterised by absolute cost advantages, substantial economies of scale and/or economies of scope, capacity constraints and high sunk costs.
Visoke strukturne ovire na primer obstajajo, kadar so za trg značilne absolutne stroškovne prednosti, znatna ekonomija obsega in/ali razpona, omejitve zmogljivosti in visoki nepovratni stroški.
Legal or regulatory barriers are not based on economic conditions, but result from legislative, administrative or other measures that have a direct effect on the conditions of entry and/or the positioning of operators in the relevant market.
Pravne ali regulativne ovire ne temeljijo na gospodarskih razmerah, temveč izvirajo iz zakonodajnih, upravnih ali drugih ukrepov, ki neposredno vplivajo na pogoje vstopa in/ali umestitve ponudnikov na upoštevnem trgu.
An example of a legal or regulatory barrier impeding or preventing entry into a market is a limit on the number of undertakings that have access to spectrum for the provision of underlying services.
Kot primer pravne ali regulativne ovire, ki ovira ali preprečuje vstop na trg, se lahko uporablja omejitev števila podjetij z dostopom do spektra za zagotavljanje osnovnih storitev.
Other examples of legal or regulatory barriers are price controls or other price-related measures imposed on undertakings, which affect not only entry but also the positioning of undertakings on the market.
Drugi primeri pravnih ali regulativnih ovir so cenovni nadzori ali drugi ukrepi v zvezi s cenami, ki so bili uvedeni za podjetja ter vplivajo na vstop in umestitev podjetij na trgu.
Legal or regulatory barriers that are likely to be removed within the relevant time horizon should not normally be deemed to constitute a barrier to entry such as to fulfil the first criterion.
Pravne ali regulativne ovire, ki bodo verjetno odpravljene v ustreznem časovnem okviru, običajno ne bi smele pomeniti ovire za vstop na trg v smislu prvega merila.
Barriers to entry may also become less relevant with regard to innovation-driven markets characterised by ongoing technological progress.
Ovire za vstop lahko postanejo manj pomembne na trgih, vezanih na inovacije, za katere je značilen stalni tehnološki napredek.
This Recommendation identifies markets where barriers to entry are expected to persist over a foreseeable period.
To priporočilo opredeljuje trge, pri katerih se pričakuje, da bodo ovire za vstop trajale dlje kot predvideno obdobje.
In assessing whether barriers to entry are likely to persist in the absence of regulation, it is necessary to examine whether the industry has experienced frequent and successful entry and whether entry has been or is likely in the future to be sufficiently immediate and persistent to limit market power.
Pri ocenjevanju, ali bodo ovire za vstop brez regulacije trga še naprej obstajale, je treba preveriti, ali je industrija izkusila pogoste in uspešne vstope na trg in ali so vstopi bili ali bodo verjetno v prihodnosti dovolj hitri in trajni, da bodo omejili tržno moč.
The relevance of barriers to entry will depend, inter alia, on the minimum efficient scale of output and the costs which are sunk.
Pomen ovir za vstop bo med drugim odvisen od najmanjšega učinkovitega obsega proizvodnje in nepovratnih stroškov.
Even when a market is characterised by high barriers to entry, other structural factors in that market may entail that the market still tends towards becoming effectively competitive within a relevant time horizon.
Tudi kadar so za trg značilne visoke ovire za vstop, lahko drugi strukturni dejavniki na tem trgu pomenijo, da se trg še vedno nagiba proti učinkoviti konkurenci v ustreznem časovnem okviru.
A tendency towards effective competition, under the second criterion, implies that the market will either reach the status of effective competition absent ex ante regulation within the period of review, or will do so after that period provided clear evidence of positive dynamics in the market is available within the period of review.
Nagibanje k učinkoviti konkurenci v skladu z drugim merilom pomeni, da bo trg dosegel status učinkovite konkurence brez predhodnega urejanja v obdobju pregleda ali pa bo ta status dosegel po navedenem obdobju, če bodo v tem obdobju zagotovljeni jasni dokazi o pozitivni tržni dinamiki.
Market dynamics may, for instance, be caused by technological developments, or by the convergence of products and markets which may give rise to competitive constraints being exercised between operators active in distinct product markets.
Tržno dinamiko lahko na primer povzroči tehnološki razvoj ali zbliževanje proizvodov in trgov, ki lahko povzroči konkurenčne omejitve med izvajalci, ki delujejo na ločenih proizvodnih trgih.
This may also be the case in markets with a limited — but sufficient — number of undertakings having diverging cost structures and facing price-elastic market demand.
Do tega lahko pride tudi na trgih z omejenim, vendar zadostnim številom podjetij z različnimi strukturami stroškov, ki se spopadajo s tržnim povpraševanjem po elastičnih cenah.
There may also be excess capacity in a market that would normally allow rival firms to expand output very rapidly in response to any price increase.
Na trgu lahko obstaja tudi presežna zmogljivost, ki konkurenčnim podjetjem običajno omogoči zelo hitro povečanje proizvodnje kot odgovor na kakršno koli povišanje cen.
In such markets, market shares may change over time and/or decreasing prices may be observed.
Na takih trgih lahko sčasoma pride do spremembe tržnih deležev in/ali zniževanja cen.
The third criterion serves to assess the adequacy of corrective measures that can be imposed under competition law to tackle identified persistent market failure(s), in particular given that ex ante regulatory obligations may effectively prevent competition law infringements.
Tretje merilo se uporablja za ocenjevanje zadostnosti korektivnih ukrepov, ki se lahko v skladu s konkurenčnim pravom uvedejo za odpravo ugotovljenih trajnih tržnih pomanjkljivosti, zlasti glede na to, da lahko predhodne regulativne obveznosti učinkovito preprečijo kršitve konkurenčnega prava.
Competition law interventions are likely to be insufficient where, for instance, the compliance requirements of an intervention to redress persistent market failure(s) are extensive or where frequent and/or timely intervention is indispensable.
Ukrepi konkurenčnega prava verjetno ne bodo zadostovali, če so na primer zahteve po skladnosti ukrepanja za odpravo trajnih tržnih pomanjkljivosti obsežne ali če je nujno pogosto in/ali pravočasno ukrepanje.
Thus, ex ante regulation should be considered an appropriate complement to competition law when competition law alone would not adequately address persistent market failure(s) identified.
Zato bi bilo treba predhodno urejanje šteti za ustrezno dopolnilo konkurenčnemu pravu, kadar samo konkurenčno pravo ne bi zadostovalo za odpravo ugotovljenih trajnih tržnih pomanjkljivosti.
The application of these three cumulative criteria should limit the number of markets within the electronic communications sector where ex ante regulatory obligations are imposed and thereby contribute to one of the aims of the regulatory framework, namely to reduce ex ante sector-specific rules progressively as competition in the markets develops.
Uporaba teh treh kumulativnih meril bi morala omejiti število trgov v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij, na katerih se uvedejo predhodne regulativne obveznosti, kar bi prispevalo k enemu od ciljev regulativnega okvira, in sicer da se z razvojem konkurence na trgih postopno omejijo predhodne posebne določbe, ki veljajo za sektor.
Failure to meet any one of the three criteria would indicate that a market should not be identified as susceptible to ex ante regulation.
Neizpolnjevanje katerega koli od teh treh meril pomeni, da trg ne bi smel biti predmet predhodnega urejanja.