natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the effort or investment which the undertaking had to undertake to acquire the information;
vložena prizadevanja ali vložek podjetja za pridobitev informacij;
the effort which others would need to undertake to acquire or copy the information;
prizadevanja, ki bi jih morali vložiti drugi v pridobivanje ali kopiranje informacij;
the degree of protection offered to such information under the legislation of the EFTA State concerned.
stopnja zaščite takih informacij po zakonodaji zadevne države EFTA.
In principle, the Authority considers that the following information would not normally be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy:
Nadzorni organ načeloma meni, da za naslednje informacije navadno ne velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti:
information which is publicly available, including information available only upon payment through specialised information services or information which is common knowledge among specialists in the field (for example common knowledge among engineers or medical doctors).
informacije, ki so javno dostopne, skupaj z informacijami, ki so na voljo zgolj za plačilo prek specializiranih informacijskih služb, ali informacijami, ki so med strokovnjaki na posameznem področju splošno znane (na primer med inženirji ali zdravniki).
Likewise, turnover is not normally considered as a business secret, as it is a figure published in the annual accounts or otherwise known to the market.
Podobno se za poslovno skrivnost navadno ne šteje prihodek od prodaje, saj je objavljen v letnih računovodskih izkazih ali drugače znan trgu.
Reasons must be given for requests for confidentiality concerning turnover figures which are not in the public domain and the requests must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Pri zahtevkih za zaupnost podatkov o prihodkih od prodaje, ki niso javni, je treba navesti razloge za zaupnost, o zahtevkih pa je treba presojati za vsak primer posebej.
The fact that information is not publicly available does not necessarily mean that the information can be regarded as a business secret;
Dejstvo, da informacije niso javno dostopne, ne pomeni nujno, da se lahko obravnavajo kot poslovna skrivnost;
historical information, in particular information at least five years old;
informacije iz preteklih let, zlasti starejše od petih let;
statistical or aggregate information;
statistične ali zbirne podatke;
names of aid recipients, sector of activity, purpose and amount of the aid, etc.
imena prejemnikov pomoči, sektor dejavnosti, namen in znesek pomoči itn.
Detailed reasons must be given for any request to derogate from these principles in exceptional cases.
Pri vsakem zahtevku za odstopanje od teh načel v izjemnih primerih je treba navesti podrobne razloge.
Other confidential information
Druge zaupne informacije
In antitrust and merger cases, confidential information includes certain types of information communicated to the Authority on condition that confidentiality is observed (for example a market study commissioned by an undertaking which is party to the procedure and forming part of its property).
V protimonopolnih primerih in primerih združevanja podjetij se lahko za zaupne informacije štejejo nekatere vrste informacij, sporočene Nadzornemu organu pod pogojem spoštovanja zaupnosti (kot je tržna raziskava, ki jo je naročilo podjetje, ki je stranka v postopku, in je sestavni del njegovega premoženja).
It seems that a similar approach could be retained for State Aid decisions.
Zdi se, da bi se podoben postopek lahko ohranil tudi pri odločbah o državni pomoči.
In the field of State Aid, there may, however, be some forms of confidential information, which would not necessarily be present in antitrust and merger procedures, referring specifically to secrets of the State or other confidential information relating to its organisational activity.
Pri dodeljevanju državnih pomoči pa se lahko vseeno pojavijo nekatere oblike zaupnih informacij, ki pri protimonopolnih postopkih in postopkih združevanja podjetij niso nujne ter se nanašajo posebej na državne skrivnosti ali druge zaupne informacije v zvezi z njihovimi organizacijskimi dejavnostmi.
Generally, in view of the Authority's obligation to state the reasons for its decisions and the transparency requirement, such information can only in very exceptional circumstances be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
Ker mora Nadzorni organ spoštovati obveznost navedbe razlogov za svoje odločitve, in zaradi zahteve po preglednosti lahko na splošno za take informacije le v zelo izjemnih primerih velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti.
Applicable procedure
Veljavni postopek
The Authority's main task is to reconcile two opposing obligations, namely the requirement to state the reasons for its decisions under Article 16 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement and therefore ensure that its decisions contain all the essential elements on which they are based, and that of safeguarding the obligation of professional secrecy.
Glavna naloga Nadzornega organa je uskladiti dve nasprotujoči si obveznosti, in sicer zahtevo po navedbi razlogov za odločbo po členu 16 Sporazuma o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču, torej zagotoviti, da odločbe vsebujejo vse bistvene elemente, na katerih temeljijo, ter obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti.
Besides the basic obligation to state the reasons for its decisions, the Authority has to take into account the need for effective application of the State Aid rules (inter alia, by giving EFTA States, beneficiaries and interested parties the possibility to comment on or challenge its decisions) and for transparency of its policy.
Poleg osnovne obveznosti navedbe razlogov za svoje odločbe mora Nadzorni organ upoštevati potrebo po učinkovitem izvajanju predpisov o državni pomoči (med drugim tako, da državam EFTA, upravičencem in zainteresiranim strankam da možnost za pripombe ali pritožbe na odločbe) ter za preglednost svoje politike.
There is therefore an overriding interest in making public the full substance of its decisions.
Zato obstaja prevladujoč interes za javno objavo celotne vsebine njegovih odločb.
As a general principle, requests for confidential treatment can only be granted where strictly necessary to protect business secrets or other confidential information meriting similar protection.
Načeloma se lahko zahtevkom za zaupno obravnavo ugodi samo, kadar je to nujno za zavarovanje poslovnih skrivnosti ali drugih zaupnih informacij, ki utemeljeno potrebujejo tovrstno zaščito.
Business secrets and other confidential information do not enjoy an absolute protection: this means for example that they could be divulged when they are essential for the Authority's statement of the reasons for its decisions.
Poslovne skrivnosti in druge zaupne informacije ne uživajo popolne zaščite: to na primer pomeni, da bi se lahko razkrile, kadar so nujne za utemeljitev razlogov za odločbe Nadzornega organa.
This means that information necessary for the identification of an aid measure and its beneficiary cannot normally be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
To pomeni, da za informacije, ki so potrebne za opredelitev ukrepa pomoči in upravičenca do njega, navadno ne more veljati obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti.
Similarly, information necessary to demonstrate that the conditions of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement are met, cannot normally be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
Podobno za informacije, potrebne za dokazilo, da so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 61 Sporazuma EGP, navadno ne more veljati obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti.
However, the Authority will have to consider carefully whether the need for publication is more important, given the specific circumstances of a case, than the prejudice that might be generated for that EFTA State or undertaking involved.
Vendar pa bo moral Nadzorni organ skrbno presoditi, ali je potreba po objavi pomembnejša, glede na posebne okoliščine primera, kakor pomisleki, ki bi utegnili nastati v zvezi z navedeno državo EFTA ali vpletenim podjetjem.
The public version of a Authority decision can only feature deletions from the adopted version for reasons of professional secrecy.
V javni različici odločbe Nadzornega organa so možni izbrisi iz sprejete različice samo iz razlogov poklicne skrivnosti.
Paragraphs cannot be moved, and no sentence can be added or altered.
Odstavkov ni mogoče prestavljati, prav tako ne dodajati ali spremeniti stavkov.
Where the Authority considers that certain information cannot be disclosed, a footnote may be added, paraphrasing the non-disclosed information or indicating a range of magnitude or size, if useful to assure the comprehensibility and coherence of the decision.
Kadar Nadzorni organ meni, da nekaterih informacij ni mogoče razkriti, se lahko doda opomba z opisom nerazkritih informacij ali navedbo njihovega pomena ali obsega, če to prispeva k boljši razumljivosti in skladnosti odločbe.
Requests not to disclose the full text of a decision or substantial parts of it which would undermine the understanding of the Authority's statement of reasons cannot be accepted.
Zahtevkov za nerazkritje celotnega besedila ali daljših delov odločbe, zaradi česar ne bi bilo več mogoče razumeti navedbe razlogov Nadzornega organa, ni mogoče sprejeti.
If there is a complainant involved, the Authority will take into account the complainant's interest in ascertaining the reasons why the Authority adopted a certain decision, without the need to have recourse to Court proceedings [3].
Pri pritožbah Nadzorni organ upošteva interes pritožnika za utemeljitev razlogov, zakaj je Nadzorni organ sprejel odločbo, ne da bi se bilo treba pritožniku zateči k sodnim postopkom [3].
Hence, requests by EFTA States for parts of the decision which address concerns of complainants to be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy will need to be particularly well reasoned and persuasive.
Zato morajo biti zahtevki držav EFTA za obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti za dele odločbe, ki se nanašajo na pritožbe, zelo dobro utemeljeni in prepričljivi.
On the other hand, the Authority will not normally be inclined to disclose information alleged to be of the kind covered by the obligation of professional secrecy where there is a suspicion that the complaint has been lodged primarily to obtain access to the information.
Po drugi strani Nadzorni organ navadno ne bo razkril informacij, za kakršne bi lahko veljala obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti, kadar obstaja sum, da je bila pritožba vložena predvsem zato, da bi se pridobil dostop do informacij.
EFTA States cannot invoke professional secrecy to refuse to provide information to the Authority which the Authority considers necessary for the examination of aid measures.
Države EFTA se ne morejo sklicevati na poklicno skrivnost in zavrniti posredovanja informacij, ki se Nadzornemu organu zdijo potrebne za preverjanje ukrepov pomoči.
In this respect, reference is made to the procedure set out in Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement (in particular Articles 2(2), 5, 10 and 16 in Part II of Protocol 3).
V zvezi s tem se uporablja postopek iz Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču (zlasti členov 2(2), 5, 10 in 16 v delu II Protokola 3).
The Authority currently notifies its decisions to the EFTA State concerned without delay and gives the latter the opportunity to indicate, normally within a time period of 15 working days, which information it considers to be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
Nadzorni organ trenutno o svojih odločbah nemudoma obvesti zadevno državo EFTA in ji omogoči, da mu navadno v 15 delovnih dneh sporoči, za katere informacije po njenem mnenju velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti.
This time period may be extended by agreement between the Authority and the EFTA State concerned.
Ta rok je mogoče podaljšati v soglasju med Nadzornim organom in zadevno državo EFTA.
Where the EFTA State concerned does not indicate which information it considers to be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy within the period prescribed by the Authority, the decision will normally be disclosed in full.
Kadar zadevna država EFTA ne navede, za katere informacije po njenem mnenju velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti, v roku, ki ga določi Nadzorni organ, se odločba navadno razkrije v celoti.
Where the EFTA State concerned wishes certain information to be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, it must indicate the parts it considers to be covered and provide a justification in respect of each part for which non-disclosure is requested.
Kadar zadevna država EFTA želi, da za nekatere podatke velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti, mora navesti dele, ki naj bodo zajeti, in predložiti utemeljitev za vsak del, za katerega se zahteva nerazkritje.
The Authority will then examine the request from the EFTA State without delay.
Nadzorni organ bo nato nemudoma preučil zahtevek države EFTA.
If the Authority does not accept that certain parts of the decision are covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, it will state the reasons why in its view those parts cannot be left out of the public version of the decision.
Če se Nadzorni organ ne strinja, da za nekatere dele odločbe velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti, navede razloge, zakaj po njegovem mnenju ti deli ne morejo biti izpuščeni iz javne različice odločbe.
In the absence of an acceptable justification by the EFTA State for its request (i.e. reasoning which is not manifestly irrelevant or manifestly wrong), the Authority need not further specify the reasons why those parts cannot be left out of the public version of the decision other than by referring to the absence of justification.
Če država EFTA ne predloži sprejemljive utemeljitve za svoj zahtevek (sprejemljiva utemeljitev je obrazložitev, ki ni očitno neutemeljena ali očitno napačna), Nadzornemu organu ni treba nadalje navajati razlogov, zakaj navedenih delov ni mogoče izpustiti iz javne različice odločbe, razen tega, da se sklicuje na pomanjkanje utemeljitve.
If the Authority decides to accept that certain parts are covered by the obligation of professional secrecy without agreeing in full with the EFTA State's request, it will notify its decision with a new draft to the EFTA State indicating the parts which have been omitted.
Če Nadzorni organ soglaša, da za nekatere dele velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti, čeprav se povsem ne strinja z zahtevkom države EFTA, to o svoji odločitvi obvesti z novim osnutkom, v katerem so označeni izpuščeni deli.
If the Authority accepts that the parts indicated by the EFTA State are covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, the text of the decision will be published pursuant to Article 26 in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, with the omission of the parts covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
Če Nadzorni organ soglaša, da za dele, ki jih navede država EFTA, velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti, se besedilo odločbe objavi v skladu s členom 26 v delu II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču z izpuščenimi deli, za katere velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti.
Such omissions will be indicated in the text [4].
V besedilu se navede, da je del izpuščen [4].
The EFTA State will have 15 working days following receipt of the Authority's decision stating the reasons for its refusal to accept the non-disclosure of certain parts, to react and provide additional elements to justify its request.
Država EFTA bo po prejetju odločbe Nadzornega organa, v kateri ta navaja svoje razloge za nesoglasje z nerazkritjem nekaterih delov, imela 15 delovnih dni časa, da se odzove in predloži dodatne elemente, ki utemeljujejo njen zahtevek.
If the EFTA State concerned does not react further within the period prescribed by the Authority, the Authority will normally publish the decision as indicated in its reply to the original request made by the EFTA State.
Če se vpletena država EFTA ne odzove v roku, ki ga določi Nadzorni organ, ta običajno objavi odločbo, kot je navedeno v njegovem odgovoru na izvirni zahtevek države EFTA.
If the EFTA State concerned does submit any additional elements within the prescribed period, those elements will be examined by the Authority without delay.
Če vpletena država EFTA predloži dodatne elemente v predpisanem roku, jih Nadzorni organ nemudoma preuči.
If the Authority accepts that the parts indicated by the EFTA State are covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, the text of the decision will be published as set out above.
Če Nadzorni organ soglaša, da za dele, ki jih navede država EFTA, velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti, se besedilo odločbe objavi, kakor je določeno zgoraj.
In the event that it is not possible to reach agreement, the Authority will proceed with the publication of its decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure forthwith.
Če ni mogoče doseči soglasja, Nadzorni organ nadaljuje postopek objave svoje odločbe o takojšnjem začetku formalnega postopka preiskave.
Such decisions must summarise the relevant issues of fact and law, include a preliminary assessment of the aid character of the proposed measure and set out the doubts as to its compatibility with the common market.
Take odločbe morajo povzeti bistvena dejanska in pravna vprašanja, vključevati predhodno oceno o vrsti pomoči v okviru predlaganega ukrepa in izpostaviti dvome o njegovi združljivosti s skupnim trgom.
Clearly certain essential information must be included in order to enable third parties and the other EFTA States to comment usefully.
Vsekakor morajo biti vključene nekatere bistvene informacije, da se tretjim strankam in drugim državam EFTA omogoči dajanje koristnih pripomb.
The duty of the Authority to provide such essential information will normally prevail over any claim to the protection of business secrets or other confidential information.
Dolžnost Nadzornega organa za zagotavljanje takih bistvenih informacij navadno prevlada nad drugimi zahtevami po zaščiti poslovnih skrivnosti ali drugih zaupnih informacij.
Furthermore, it is in the interest of the beneficiary as well as interested parties to have access to such a decision as quickly as possible.
Poleg tega je čimprejšnji dostop do take odločbe v interesu upravičenca ter tudi zainteresiranih strank.
Permitting any delay in this respect would jeopardise the process of State Aid control.
Zamude pri tem bi ogrozile postopek nadzora nad državnimi pomočmi.
In the event that it is not possible to reach agreement on requests for certain information in decisions not to raise objections and decisions to close the formal investigation procedure to be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, the Authority will notify its final decision to the EFTA State together with the text it intends to publish, giving the EFTA State another 15 working days to react.
Če v odločbah o nenasprotovanju in o zaključku postopka formalne preiskave ni mogoče doseči soglasja o zahtevkih, da za nekatere informacije velja obveznost varovanja poklicnih informacij, Nadzorni organ sporoči svojo končno odločbo državi EFTA skupaj z besedilom, ki ga namerava objaviti, in ji da dodatnih 15 delovnih dni za odziv.
In the absence of an answer which the Authority considers pertinent, the Authority will normally proceed with the publication of the text.
Če ni ustreznega odgovora, Nadzorni organ nadaljuje objave besedila kot običajno.
The Authority is currently reviewing its State Aid notification forms.
Nadzorni organ trenutno pregleduje svoje obrazce za priglasitev državne pomoči.
In order to avoid unnecessary correspondence with EFTA States and delay in the publication of decisions, it intends, in the future, to include in the form a question asking whether the notification contains information which should not be published, and the reasons for non-publication.
Da bi se izognil nepotrebni korespondenci z državami EFTA in zamudi pri objavi odločb, namerava v prihodnje v obrazec vključiti vprašanje, ali priglasitev vsebuje informacije, ki se ne bi smele objaviti, in o razlogih za neobjavo.
Only if that question is answered in the affirmative will the Authority enter into correspondence with the EFTA State in respect of specific cases.
Samo če je odgovor na to vprašanje pritrdilen, bo Nadzorni organ začel korespondenco z državo EFTA v zvezi s posameznimi primeri.
Similarly, if additional information is required by the Authority, the EFTA State will have to indicate at the moment it provides the information requested whether such information should not be published, and the reasons for non-publication.
Če Nadzorni organ zahteva dodatne informacije, bo morala država EFTA ob predložitvi prav tako navesti, da se ne bi smele objaviti, in navesti razloge za neobjavo.
If the Authority uses the information thus identified by the EFTA State in its decision, it will communicate the adopted decision to the EFTA State, stating the reasons why in its view these parts cannot be left out from the public version of the decision as laid down above.
Če Nadzorni organ v svoji odločbi uporabi informacije, ki jih je kot take opredelila država EFTA, tej sporoči sprejeto odločbo in navede razloge, zakaj po njegovem mnenju zadevnih delov ni mogoče izpustiti iz javne različice odločbe, kakor je določeno zgoraj.
Once the Authority has decided what text it will publish and notified the EFTA State of its final decision, it is for the EFTA State to decide whether or not to make use of any judicial procedures available to it, including any interim measures, within the time-limits provided for in Article 36 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Ko Nadzorni organ odloči, katero besedilo bo objavil, in o svoji končni odločbi obvesti državo EFTA, se mora ta v roku iz člena 36 Sporazuma o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču odločiti, ali se bo zatekla k sodnim postopkom, ki so ji na voljo, z začasnimi odredbami vred.
Where third parties other than the EFTA State concerned (for example, complainants, other EFTA States or the beneficiary) submit information in the context of State Aid procedures, these guidelines will be applied mutatis mutandis.
Kadar informacije v okviru postopkov, ki se nanašajo na državno pomoč, ne predloži zadevna država EFTA, temveč tretje stranke (na primer pritožniki, druge države EFTA ali upravičenec), se te smernice uporabljajo s smiselnimi spremembami.
Application in time
Časovni okvir veljavnosti
These guidelines cannot establish binding legal rules and do not purport to do so.
Te smernice ne vzpostavljajo zavezujočih pravnih predpisov niti nimajo tega namena.
They merely set out in advance, in the interests of sound administration, the manner in which the Authority intends to address the issue of confidentiality in State Aid procedures.
V interesu učinkovitega upravljanja zgolj vnaprej določajo način, kako namerava Nadzorni organ obravnavati vprašanje zaupnosti v postopkih, ki se nanašajo na državne pomoči.
As a rule, if agreement cannot be reached, the Authority's decision to publish may be the subject of specific judicial review proceedings.
Če ni mogoče doseči soglasja, lahko za odločbo Nadzornega organa o objavi praviloma veljajo posebni postopki sodnega nadzora.
As these guidelines merely pertain to procedural matters (and to a large extent set out existing practice), they will be applied with immediate effect, including for decisions not to raise objections [5] adopted before the entry into force of the amendments [6] to Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement to which third parties seek access.
Ker te smernice zadevajo le proceduralne zadeve (in v glavnem obravnavajo obstoječo prakso), se bodo uporabljale s takojšnjim začetkom veljave, skupaj z odločbami o nenasprotovanju [5], sprejetimi pred začetkom veljavnosti sprememb [6] Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču, za dostop do katerih si prizadevajo tretje stranke.
Case 145/83 Adams v Commission [1985] ECR 3539, para. 34, and Case T-353/94 Postbank v Commission [1996] ECR II-921, para. 86.
Primer 145/83 Adams proti Komisiji [1985] ECR 3539, ods. 34, in primer T-353/94 Postbank proti Komisiji [1996] ECR II-921, ods. 86.
Case C-367/95 P Commission v Sytraval [ECR] 1998, I-1719, para. 64.
Primer C-367/95 P Komisija proti Sytravalu [ECR] 1998, I-1719, ods. 64.