natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Considers that situations of crisis and fragility require the development of policies which call for new approaches, new methods and expertise, particularly concerning activities such as (i) identifying risks at different operational levels, (ii) making scenario and projections of likely consequences and (iii) designing instruments to avoid, reduce and prepare for risks and potential disaster; calls for a flexible approach in order to allow the Commission to adapt its measures and instruments for assistance adequately and rapidly to a crisis and post-crisis situation; notes in this context that in the meantime the Commission has set up a system to mobilise experts in various fields of competence in order to allow at short notice the deployment of additional staff to Union delegations or headquarter services in the case of staff shortage;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so projekti, povezani z upravljanjem, v splošnem dosegli dobre rezultate, a meni, da so sistemi za izvajanje in nadzor projektov šibki ali neučinkoviti, saj je Računsko sodišče pri štirih od osmih revidiranih projektov instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč, povezanih z upravljanjem, odkrilo bistvene pomanjkljivosti;
Encourages the Commission and the EEAS to work systematically on the four phases of the disaster management cycle namely mitigation and preparedness, response and recovery towards the definition of strategic framework for disaster risk management and resilience-building; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to inform Parliament about the developments in particular with regard to risk management and the preparedness to implement and achieve programme objectives in a post-disaster context;
poudarja, da je bil pri reformi pravosodja od leta 2007 dosežen le zmeren napredek;
Recalls that in the circumstances of any such crisis, due care has to be attributed to the soundness and operational effectiveness of the national governance framework for managing disaster risk reduction as a pre-condition for the success of the Union intervention; recalls that the assessment of any national governance framework should take into account, inter alia, the existing accountability frameworks for outcomes, the existing definition and decision of responsibilities at central and local levels, a clear chain of commands and controls, information channels among various actors/donors alongside with feedback mechanisms on projects;
vztraja, da je treba okrepiti trenutno zaščito prijaviteljev nepravilnosti, ki je opredeljena v nacionalni protikorupcijski strategiji za obdobje 2013–2018; meni, da bi morali srbski organi nadaljevati pripravo nove zakonodaje o prijaviteljih nepravilnosti, ta pa bi morala vzbujati zaupanje in spodbujati morebitne prijavitelje nepravilnosti k ravnanju;
Supports the Court of Auditors' recommendations with regard to Union support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti and welcomes the Commission's response to also accept the recommendations;
poudarja priporočila Računskega sodišča in poziva Komisijo, naj nameni ustrezno pozornost opredelitvi ciljev, oceni potrebe in se opre na izkušnje iz preteklih projektov, prav tako pa naj se izogiba zamudam ter neučinkovitim ali neuspešnim postopkom javnega naročanja; poudarja, kako pomembna je trajnost, saj so se ob rezultatih dveh tretjin projektov, zlasti tistih, ki so povezani z upravljanjem, porodila številna vprašanja;
Part XX
Del XXV
Special Report No 14/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘How do the EU institutions and bodies calculate, reduce and offset their greenhouse gas emissions?’
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 20/2014 z naslovom „Ali je bila podpora malim in srednjim podjetjem iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj na področju e-trgovanja učinkovita?“
Believes that all Union institutions and bodies should aim at a common approach to their greenhouse gas emissions and their possible reduction; considers that in order to achieve this they need to comprehensively calculate their greenhouse gas emissions and should not refrain from publishing their results;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 20/2014 ter podpira njegove zaključke in priporočila;
Believes that the Commission, in order to maintain its reliability in environmental negotiations with third parties, should put more effort in collecting more data on its own greenhouse gas emissions;
pozdravlja tudi konstruktiven odziv Komisije na priporočila Računskega sodišča;
Invites those Union institutions and bodies who have no Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) certificate to consider applying it promptly; emphasises, however, that EMAS should be considered as a tool to structure, inter alia, greenhouse gas emissions and should not be considered as the sole ultimate goal of the green policy of the institutions;
ugotavlja, da so tehnologije e-trgovanja osrednjega pomena za izboljševanje razvoja in konkurenčnosti malih in srednjih podjetij; poudarja, kako pomembna so mala in srednja podjetja za gospodarski razvoj in ustvarjanje delovnih mest v Uniji;
Points out that offsetting greenhouse gas emissions can be used by the Union institutions and bodies to a greater degree to reduce their carbon footprint; agrees with the Court of Auditors that using high-quality offsets in addition to emission reduction measures (and not instead of such reduction measures) would address these issues appropriately; notes however that offsetting should come second to investing these funds to further improvement of environmental policy of the Union institutions and bodies;
je zadovoljen, da je Računsko sodišče v posebnem poročilu poudarilo, kako pomembna sta merjenje uspešnosti in evropska dodana vrednost;
Welcomes the fact that some of the Union institutions have started pilot projects of green procurement; hopes that the results prove to be promising and that green procurement will become a standard procedure of the Union institutions and bodies in the future;
ugotavlja, da so bili projekti, izbrani za naložbe, kljub povečanju dostopnosti spletnega poslovanja šibki; ugotavlja, da je prišlo zaradi pomanjkanja primerjalne izbire vlog in odsotnosti celovitih poslovnih informacij do tega, da je več kot tretjina primerov v zameno za vložena sredstva ponujala le malo ali nič rezultatov;
Stresses that in the implementation of these policies, human factors remain a key aspect; urges therefore the management in the Union institutions and bodies responsible for these policies to train and improve further their skills and understanding of the importance of the greenhouse gas emissions of the institutions; hopes that the establishment of the new College of Commissioners in 2014 provides an opportunity of a new opening in implementation of higher standards in the Commission and its agencies;
poudarja, da bi se 10 od 30 sofinanciranih projektov, ki jih je revidiralo Računsko sodišče, izvedlo tudi brez javnega sofinanciranja, pet od njih se je začelo izvajati pred dodelitvijo nepovratnih sredstev, trije pa so se začeli izvajati že, preden je podjetje sploh posredovalo vlogo za sofinanciranje;
Part XXI
meni, da bi bilo treba v prihodnje obvezno predložiti poslovni načrt, ki bi dokazoval dodano evropsko vrednost, da bi se izognili mrtvim izgubam;
Special Report No 15/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added value’
poudarja, da bi morale države članice uvesti izbirna merila in postopke, s katerimi bi zagotovile, da bodo izbrani projekti prinesli kar največjo dodano vrednost v smislu prispevka k razvoju e-trgovanja v malih in srednjih podjetij ter doseganja ciljev Evropske digitalne agende;
Notes with concern that the strategic objectives of the External Borders Fund (EBF) have not been clear, and that, in particular, there is tension between the general nature of the EBF as solidarity mechanism and its concentration on concrete objectives for better cooperation in the field of border controls and visas;
ugotavlja, da Komisija ni opravljala nadzora, zato ni bilo mogoče oceniti, v kolikšni meri je podpora iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) prispevala k uresničitvi nacionalnih in evropskih ciljev na področju informacijske tehnologije, pa tudi lastnih poslovnih načrtov malih in srednjih podjetij;
Notes that for the Commission the successful launch of SIS II, VIS and Eurosur in all Member States indicates the contribution of the EBF; is of the opinion, however, that such a general statement can never be used as a satisfactory reply to the Court of Auditors' specific criticisms of lacking performance indicators;
meni, da bi morala Komisija poskrbeti za to, da bo od držav članic prejemala dosledne in zanesljive informacije o uporabi sredstev ESRR; meni, da bi morale te informacije opisovati napredek operativnih programov, ne le v finančnem smislu, temveč tudi v smislu uspešnosti;
Notes that similar problems may arise in respect of the objectives of the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund (ISF), since again this instrument serves both solidarity between Member States in respect of border controls management and the realisation of a uniform and high level of control of the external borders and the effective processing of Schengen visas, in compliance with the Union's commitment to fundamental freedoms and human rights;
se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da bi bilo treba v sporazumih o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev opredeliti minimalni niz robustnih kazalnikov s povezanimi cilji ter jih nato meriti in nadalje spremljati, tako ob začetku izvajanja projekta kot tudi v poznejših fazah, s čimer bi ocenili uspešnost projektov;
Emphasises that Member States, whilst recognising the importance of effective border controls at the common external borders as part of the Schengen acquis, regard border controls management and, to a lesser extent, the processing of visas still as essentially national competences;
Del XXVI
Calls on the Member States to therefore include the ISF in national strategies for border management in order to contribute to consular cooperation, to Frontex operations or to emergency actions and specific actions which are of importance to the Schengen area as a whole; urges the Commission and the Member States to improve their cooperation in this regard;
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 21/2014 z naslovom „Letališka infrastruktura, financirana s sredstvi EU: slaba stroškovna učinkovitost“
Requests that the Commission examine whether it may be useful to divide the border controls and visas part of the ISF into several earmarked segments: one for solidarity, one for the fulfilment of consular cooperation, Frontex operations and emergency and specific actions, and one for actions that are particularly relevant from a national perspective;
priznava, da je Komisija že uvedla vrsto sprememb v zvezi z vprašanji, navedenimi v posebnem poročilu, in močno podpira nov regulativni okvir, ki ga je opisala Komisija; z ozirom na to meni, da bi morala Komisija po enem letu od sprejetja te resolucije Odboru za proračunski nadzor posredovati poročilo o napredku v zvezi s temi priporočili;
Recommends that Member States develop and use relevant and measurable indicators for the output, outcome and impact of the funded projects; stresses that high quality ex ante verifications should be in place to ensure that all funded projects serve concrete and measurable objectives and have added value; notes that ex post verifications would help to provide quality control mechanisms;
podpira priporočilo Računskega sodišča o tem, da imajo države članice skladne načrte razvoja letališč, in priporoča, da Komisija pred odobritvijo financiranja posebnih projektov odobri te načrte; prav tako priporoča, naj regionalni, nacionalni ali nadnacionalni načrti ne upoštevajo le zračnega prometa, temveč tudi druga sredstva javnega prevoza, pri katerih je čas potovanja podoben kot pri letenju, na primer železniški in avtobusni promet, da bi preprečili nasičenost trga in okrepili uspešno delovanje storitev;
Points out that further Union added value can be achieved through additional contributions from the Member States to Frontex operations by making obligatory the entering of at least part of the ISF co-financed assets into Frontex's technical equipment pool obligatory;
priporoča, da se financiranje odobri zgolj finančno neodvisnim letališčem;
Is worried about the irregularities found by the Court of Auditors in the various national procurement policies and states that the exception clause for defence and security procurements may not be used in cases where less restrictive procedures could have been used without compromising security; recommends the streamlining of the procurement procedures to ensure the timely implementation of the funding;
priporoča, naj Komisija v luči analize zaledij preuči vse nove projekte, da bi zagotovila njihovo uspešnost, in pri tem v vsakem primeru upošteva pomen regionalnih letališč za dostopnost in mobilnost v Uniji;
Commends the Commission for having taken corrective financial measures in the case of a project that was found in breach of fundamental freedoms and human rights, but calls upon the Commission to identify, as far as possible, ex ante any possible risks in this regard, especially when it comes to the manner in which border controls are carried out in respect of the right to seek asylum;
meni, da bi morala Komisija obvezno tesno spremljati države članice, za katere je v poročilu navedeno, da so v preteklosti izvajale še posebej težavne projekte;
Emphasises the need to improve the standard of data collection on the funded projects at a national level in order to increase the degree of transparency;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču Evropske unije in Evropskemu računskemu sodišču ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
Part XXII
UL L 66, 8.3.2013.
Special Report No 16/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The effectiveness of blending regional investment facility grants with financial institution loans to support EU external policies’
UL C 403, 13.11.2014, str. 1.
Welcomes the special report dedicated to the evaluation of the effectiveness of blending regional investment facility grants with financial institution loans to support EU external policies and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
UL C 398, 12.11.2014, str. 1.
Encourages the Court of Auditors to further deepen audit activities in this emerging cooperation field in order to regularly provide to policymakers a regular comprehensive assessment of issues and risks at stake;
UL C 403, 13.11.2014, str. 128.
Acknowledges that the increased interest in blending and opportunities offered by the use of new financial investment facilities is mainly motivated by the combination of important developmental challenges with heavily constrained public funds, therefore leading to the development of new financial resources combining Union grant aid and non-grant resources;
Sprejeta besedila s tega dne, P8_TA(2015)0118 (glej stran 25 tega Uradnega lista).
Stresses that any new financial instruments and blending have to remain in line with the Union development policies objectives based on Official Development Assistance (ODA) criteria and set in the Agenda for Change i.e. improving the quality, the efficiency, the sustainability and the speed of implementation of the Union interventions; believes that those instruments must focus on Union priorities where economic and non-economic value added and impact are highest and considers that they have to be strategically used in sectors where Union financial support is crucial for the vitality of the investment and where blending can be most usefully deployed; regrets therefore that the special report mainly focuses on the financial aspects of blending regional investment facility grants while their efficiency and effectiveness are not sufficiently assessed;
UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str. 1.
Demands, as a core constant principle, the avoidance of the risk of financial incentives outweighing development principles (financial objectives may prevail over development concerns) and demands the respect of sustainable development principles such as social and environmental standards and access to basic public goods;
UL L 298, 26.10.2012, str. 1.
Takes note of the results of the review of the EU Platform for Blending in External Cooperation with the original aim to increase the effectiveness, efficiency and quality of existing blending mechanisms and facilities considering that harmonisation of key principles, valid for all regional facilities and financial instruments, will be of utmost importance for the new multiannual financial framework (MFF); according to the outcomes of the post-electoral revision of the MFF, invites the Commission and the EEAS to continue a structured/strategic dialogue on, in particular, the issue of how transparency and accountability would be steadily ensured and enhanced;
Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1287/2003 z dne 15. julija 2003 o uskladitvi bruto nacionalnega dohodka po tržnih cenah (Uredba BND) (UL L 181, 19.7.2003, str. 1).
Believes that during the planning phase, the Commission should concentrate on achieving sustainable, long-term, economic, social and environmental goals in the areas where the investments are to be implemented;
Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1150/2000 z dne 22. maja 2000 o izvajanju Sklepa 2007/436/ES, Euratom o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 130, 31.5.2000, str. 1).
Demands, as a core principle, the concentration of Union funds on the projects which wouldn't be implemented without the Union money, such as projects with a low profitability, but which can result to an improvement of the social, environment, human rights fields;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 3. aprila 2014 s pripombami, ki so sestavni del sklepov o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012, oddelek III – Komisija in izvajalske agencije (UL L 266, 5.9.2014, str. 32).
Demands, as a core principle, the monitoring and follow-up of the results and mid-term/long-term effects of the projects implemented on the social, environment, human rights fields; considers that the findings of such follow-up assessments should be directly used to report on achieved long-term goals and improve the planning phase/project selection for the future funding;
Uredba (EU) št. 525/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. maja 2013 o mehanizmu za spremljanje emisij toplogrednih plinov in poročanje o njih ter za sporočanje drugih informacij v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami na nacionalni ravni in ravni Unije ter o razveljavitvi Sklepa št. 280/2004/ES (UL L 165, 18.6.2013, str. 13).
Demands that the political role of the Commission, as a politically responsible body in this field, be strengthened;
Uredba (EU) št. 1301/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj in o posebnih določbah glede cilja „naložbe za rast in delovna mesta“ ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 ( UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 289).
Demands the introduction of common standards of governance for such financial activities, as well as the definition of best practices and well-defined eligibility and evaluation criteria for the use of those financial tools; believes that coherent rules of management such as structured reporting, clear monitoring frameworks and oversight conditions will result in the reduction of transaction costs or of the possible duplication of costs;
Uredba Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 357, 31.12.2002, str. 1).
Considers it imperative to design adequate governance structures of the various facilities to foster recipient countries, beneficiaries or stakeholders' ownerships of these instruments; recalls that the development of blended official development assistance channelled through facilities requires a well-structured cooperation between the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) with the European Investment Bank (EIB), the Member States and Parliament; calls on an enhanced involvement of Union Delegations in the decision process making in particular in the identification phase of projects through contributions to ex ante evaluation or impact assessment and more generally for ensuring the Union weight in the policy dialogue with partner countries and also as an interface with local civil society;
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1268/2012 z dne 29. oktobra 2012 o pravilih uporabe Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije (UL L 362, 31.12.2012, str. 1).
Insists on the necessity to achieve the highest level of transparency and accountability by accessing to exhaustive and sound budgetary information and financial data relating to projects funded by these investment facilities to allow Parliament power of scrutiny and consent; calls for regular reporting to Parliament on the use of these financial instruments and results, in particular on the assessment of the financial and non-financial leveraging and additionality while recalling complying with the provisions of Article 140 of the Financial Regulation;
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike (UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str. 1).
Supports the Court of Auditors' recommendations, as a first step in the right direction, with regard to the effectiveness of blending regional investment facility grants with financial institution loans to support Union external policies and welcomes the Commission's response to also accept the recommendations;
Direktiva 2009/28/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o spodbujanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov, spremembi in poznejši razveljavitvi direktiv 2001/77/ES in 2003/30/ES (UL L 140, 5.6.2009, str. 16).
Part XXIII
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št. 1290/2005, (ES) št. 247/2006, (ES) št. 378/2007 in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 (UL L 30, 31.1.2009, str. 16).
Special Report No 17/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Can the EU's Centres of Excellence initiative contribute effectively to mitigating chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear risks from outside the EU?’
Uredba (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov kmetijskih proizvodov in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 922/72, (EGS) št. 234/79, (ES) št. 1037/2001 in (ES) št. 1234/2007 (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 671).
Welcomes the chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) Centres of Excellence initiative; considers that its governance structure emphasises the network character of the initiative;
Direktiva 2008/56/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju politike morskega okolja (Okvirna direktiva o morski strategiji) (UL L 164, 25.6.2008, str. 19).
Welcomes the overall positive thrust of the Special Report No 17/2014 and the Court of Auditors' recommendations which were all accepted by the Commission;
Leon Braat, Patrick ten Brink (eds. et al.), The Cost of Policy Inaction: The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target, Wageningen/Brussels, 2008, str. 28.
Notes that the initiative represents an innovative approach providing for networking, regional and international partnerships, consolidating, coordinating and optimising existing capabilities in terms of expertise, training, technical assistance or equipment;
Ocena sodelovanja EU z Republiko Haiti (2008–2012), Particip GmbH, opravljeno v imenu Komisije, avgust 2014.