natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
“energy-efficient district heating” means district heating which, with regard to generation, either complies with the criteria for high-efficiency cogeneration or, in the case of heat-only boilers, meets the reference values for separate heat production laid down in Decision 2007/74/EC;
‚energetsko učinkovito daljinsko ogrevanje‘ pomeni daljinsko ogrevanje, ki glede proizvodnje izpolnjuje bodisi merila za soproizvodnjo z visokim izkoristkom ali v primeru grelnikov samo za toploto vsaj referenčne vrednosti za ločeno proizvodnjo toplote, določene v Odločbi 2007/74/ES;
“environmental tax” means a tax whose specific tax base has a clear negative effect on the environment or which seeks to tax certain activities, goods or services so that the environmental costs may be included in their price and/or so that producers and consumers are oriented towards activities which better respect the environment;
‚okoljska dajatev‘ pomeni dajatev, katere posebna davčna osnova ima jasen negativen vpliv na okolje ali ki skuša obdavčiti določene dejavnosti, blago ali storitve, da bi bili okoljski stroški lahko vključeni v njihovo ceno in/ali da bi se proizvajalci in potrošniki usmerili na dejavnosti, ki bolj spoštujejo okolje;
“Community minimum tax level” means the minimum level of taxation provided for in Community legislation.
‚najnižja davčna stopnja Skupnosti‘ pomeni najnižjo stopnjo dajatve, ki je predvidena v zakonodaji Skupnosti.
For energy products and electricity, the Community minimum tax level means the minimum level of taxation laid down in Annex I to Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity [41];
Za energente in električno energijo najnižja davčna stopnja Skupnosti pomeni najnižjo stopnjo dajatev, določeno v Prilogi I k Direktivi Sveta 2003/96/ES z dne 27. oktobra 2003 o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije [41];
“small and medium-sized enterprises” (hereafter “SMEs”), “small enterprises” and “medium-sized enterprises” (or “undertakings”) mean such enterprises within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 or any regulation replacing it [42];
‚mala in srednja podjetja‘ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MSP), ‚mala podjetja‘ in ‚srednja podjetja‘ (ali ‚podjetja‘) pomenijo taka podjetja v smislu Uredbe (ES) št. 70/2001 ali katere koli uredbe, ki to uredbo nadomešča [42];
“large enterprises” and “large undertakings” means enterprises which are not within the definition of small and medium-sized enterprises;
‚velika podjetja‘ pomenijo podjetja, ki niso zajeta v opredelitvi malih in srednjih podjetij;
“aid” means any measure fulfilling all the criteria laid down in Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement;
‚pomoč‘ pomeni vsak ukrep, ki izpolnjuje vsa merila iz člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP;
“aid intensity” means the gross aid amount expressed as a percentage of the eligible costs.
‚intenzivnost pomoči‘ pomeni bruto znesek pomoči, izražen kot odstotek upravičenih stroškov.
All figures used must be taken before any deduction of tax or other charge.
Vse uporabljene zneske je treba vzeti pred odbitkom davkov ali drugih dajatev.
Where aid is awarded in a form other than a grant, the aid amount must be the grant equivalent of the aid.
Kadar se pomoč dodeli v obliki, ki ni dotacija, mora biti znesek pomoči enak bruto ekvivalentu dotacije.
Aid payable in several instalments must be calculated at its value at the moment of granting.
Pomoč, plačljivo v več obrokih, je treba diskontirati na vrednost, ki jo je imela ob odobritvi.
The interest rate to be used for discounting purposes and for calculating the aid amount in a soft loan must be the reference rate applicable at the time of grant.
Obrestna mera, ki naj se uporabi za namene zmanjšanja in za izračun zneska pomoči v ugodnem posojilu, mora biti referenčna obrestna mera, ki se uporablja v času dodelitve.
“operating benefits” means, for the purposes of calculating eligible costs, in particular cost savings or additional ancillary production directly linked to the extra investment for environmental protection and, where applicable, benefits accruing from other support measures whether or not they constitute State aid (operating aid granted for the same eligible costs, feed-in tariffs or other support measures).
‚ugodnosti poslovanja‘ za namene izračuna upravičenih stroškov pomenijo zlasti privarčevane stroške ali dodatno pomožno proizvodnjo, neposredno povezano z dodatno naložbo za varstvo okolja, in, kadar je to primerno, ugodnosti, ki izhajajo iz drugih podpornih ukrepov, ne glede na to, ali pomenijo državno pomoč ali ne (pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, dodeljena za enake upravičene stroške, tarife na dovajanje toka ali drugi podporni ukrepi).
By contrast, proceeds flowing from the sale by the undertaking of tradable permits issued under the European Trading System will not be deemed to constitute operating benefits;
Nasprotno se dohodki, ki jih podjetje pridobi s prodajo pravic za trgovanje, izdanih v okviru evropskega sistema trgovanja, ne bodo šteli za del ugodnosti poslovanja;
“operating costs” means, for the purposes of calculating eligible costs, in particular additional production costs flowing from the extra investment for environmental protection;
‚stroški poslovanja‘ za namene izračuna upravičenih stroškov pomenijo zlasti dodatne proizvodne stroške, ki izhajajo iz dodatne naložbe za varstvo okolja;
“tangible assets” means, for the purposes of calculating eligible costs, investments in land which are strictly necessary in order to meet environmental objectives, investments in buildings, plant and equipment intended to reduce or eliminate pollution and nuisances, and investments to adapt production methods with a view to protecting the environment;
‚opredmetena sredstva‘ za namene izračuna upravičenih stroškov pomenijo naložbe v zemljišča, ki so nujno potrebne za izpolnjevanje okoljskih ciljev, naložbe v objekte, obrate in opremo, namenjene zmanjševanju ali odpravljanju onesnaževanja in nevšečnosti, ter naložbe za prilagajanje proizvodnih metod, ki bodo pripomogle k varstvu okolja;
“intangible assets” means, for the purposes of calculating eligible costs, spending on technology transfer through the acquisition of operating licences or of patented and non-patented know-how where the following conditions are complied with:
‚neopredmetena sredstva‘ za namene izračuna upravičenih stroškov pomenijo stroške za prenos tehnologije z nakupom operativnih licenc ali patentiranega in nepatentiranega znanja in izkušenj, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
the intangible asset concerned must be regarded as a depreciable asset;
zadevna neopredmetena sredstva se morajo šteti za amortizacijska sredstva;
it must be purchased on market terms, from an undertaking in which the acquirer has no power of direct or indirect control;
nakup je opravljen po tržnih pogojih od podjetja, v katerem kupec nima neposrednega ali posrednega nadzora;
it must be included in the assets of the undertaking, and remain in the establishment of the recipient of the aid and be used there for at least five years.
všteta so v sredstva podjetja in ostanejo v podjetju prejemnika pomoči, kjer se uporabljajo vsaj pet let.
This condition does not apply if the intangible asset is technically out of date.
Ta pogoj ne velja, če so takšna neopredmetena sredstva tehnološko zastarela.
If it is sold during those five years, the yield from the sale must be deducted from the eligible costs and all or part of the amount of aid must, where appropriate, be reimbursed;
Če so v teh petih letih prodana, se dobiček od prodaje odšteje od upravičenih stroškov ter celoten ali del zneska pomoči je treba, če je to primerno, vrniti;
“internalisation of costs” means the principle that all costs associated with the protection of the environment should be included in the polluting undertakings’ production costs;
‚internalizacija stroškov‘ pomeni načelo, da je treba vse stroške, povezane z varstvom okolja, vključiti v proizvodne stroške podjetja, ki onesnažuje;
“the polluter pays principle” means that the costs of measures to deal with pollution should be borne by the polluter who causes the pollution, unless the person responsible for the pollution cannot be identified or cannot be held liable under Community or national legislation or may not be made to bear the costs of remediation.
‚načelo ‚onesnaževalec plača‘ ‘ pomeni, da mora stroške ukrepov za boj proti onesnaževanju nositi onesnaževalec, ki onesnaževanje povzroča, razen če osebe, ki je odgovorna za onesnaževanje, ni mogoče določiti ali ji na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje ali zakonodaje Skupnosti ni mogoče pripisati odgovornosti ali ji ni mogoče naložiti stroškov sanacije.
Pollution in this context is the damage caused by the polluter by directly or indirectly damaging the environment, or by creating conditions leading to such damage [43], to physical surroundings or natural resources;
V tej zvezi je onesnaževanje škoda, ki jo povzroči onesnaževalec s tem, da neposredno ali posredno škoduje okolju ali ustvarja pogoje za takšno onesnaževanje [43] fizičnega okolja ali naravnih virov;
“polluter” means someone who directly or indirectly damages the environment or who creates conditions leading to such damage [44];
‚onesnaževalec‘ pomeni nekoga, ki neposredno ali posredno škoduje okolju ali ki ustvarja pogoje za takšno onesnaževanje [44];
“contaminated site” means a site where there is a confirmed presence, caused by man, of dangerous substances of such a level that they pose a significant risk to human health or the environment taking into account current and approved future use of the land.
‚onesnaženo območje‘ pomeni območje, na katerem je potrjena prisotnost nevarnih snovi, ki jo je povzročil človek, do take stopnje, da predstavljajo precejšnje tveganje za zdravje ljudi ali okolje, ob upoštevanju trenutne in odobrene prihodnje uporabe zemljišča.
Compatibility of aid under Article 61(3) of the EEA Agreement
Združljivost pomoči na podlagi člena 61(3) Sporazuma EGP
Compatibility of aid under Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement
Združljivost pomoči na podlagi člena 61(3)(c) Sporazuma EGP
State aid for environmental protection is compatible with the functioning of the EEA Agreement within the meaning of Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement if, on the basis of the balancing test, it leads to increased environmental protection activities without adversely affecting trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Državna pomoč za varstvo okolja je združljiva z delovanjem Sporazuma EGP v smislu člena 61(3)(c) Sporazuma EGP, če na podlagi testa tehtanja vodi k povečanju dejavnosti varstva okolja, ne da bi škodljivo vplivala na pogoje trgovanja do mere, ki je v nasprotju s skupnim interesom.
In this context, the duration of aid schemes should be subject to reasonable time limits, without prejudice to the possibility for an EFTA State to re-notify a measure after the time limit set by the Authority decision has passed.
V tej zvezi morajo za trajanje shem pomoči veljati razumni roki brez vplivanja na možnost, da država Efte ponovno priglasi ukrep po preteku roka, ki ga je določil Nadzorni organ.
EFTA States may support notifications of aid measures by rigorous evaluations of similar past aid measures demonstrating the incentive effect of the aid.
Države Efte lahko priglasitve ukrepov pomoči podprejo s strogimi ocenami podobnih predhodnih ukrepov pomoči, ki prikazujejo spodbujevalni učinek pomoči.
The measures described in points 73 to 146 may be found to be compatible under Article 61(3)(c).
Ukrepi, opisani v točkah 73 do 146, so lahko združljivi na podlagi člena 61(3)(c).
Aid for undertakings which go beyond Community standards or which increase the level of environmental protection in the absence of Community standards [45]
Pomoč za podjetja, ki presegajo standarde Skupnosti ali ki zvišujejo stopnjo varstva okolja v odsotnosti standardov Skupnosti [45]
Investment aid enabling undertakings to go beyond Community standards for environmental protection or to increase the level of environmental protection in the absence of Community standards will be considered compatible with the functioning of the EEA Agreement within the meaning of Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement provided that the conditions set out in points 74 to 84 and section 3.2 are fulfilled.
Pomoč za naložbe, ki podjetjem omogoča preseganje standardov Skupnosti za varstvo okolja ali povečanje varstva okolja v odsotnosti standardov Skupnosti, se bo štela za združljivo z delovanjem Sporazuma EGP v smislu člena 61(3)(c) Sporazuma EGP, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz točk 74 do 84 in oddelka 3.2.
The aided investment must fulfil one of the following two conditions:
Naložbe, ki prejemajo pomoč, morajo izpolnjevati enega izmed naslednjih dveh pogojev:
the investment enables the beneficiary to increase the level of environmental protection resulting from its activities by going beyond the applicable Community standards, irrespective of the presence of mandatory national standards that are more stringent than the Community standard; or
naložba upravičencu omogoča, da v povezavi s svojimi dejavnostmi izboljša varstvo okolja, tako da preseže veljavne standarde Skupnosti, ne glede na obstoj obveznih nacionalnih standardov, ki so strožji od standardov Skupnosti, ali
the investment enables the beneficiary to increase the level of environmental protection resulting from its activities in the absence of Community standards.
naložba upravičencu omogoča, da poviša raven varstva okolja s svojimi dejavnostmi v odsotnosti standardov Skupnosti.
Aid may not be granted where improvements bring undertakings into compliance with Community standards already adopted and not yet in force [46].
Pomoči ni mogoče dodeliti, če takšna izboljšanja privedejo le do tega, da podjetja izpolnjujejo standarde Skupnosti, ki so že sprejeti, vendar še ne veljajo [46].
The aid intensity must not exceed 50 % of the eligible investment cost as defined in points 80 to 84.
Intenzivnost pomoči ne sme presegati 50 % upravičenih stroškov naložbe, kakor so opredeljeni v točkah 80 do 84.
Where the investment aid is granted in a genuinely competitive bidding process on the basis of clear, transparent and non discriminatory criteria, effectively ensuring that the aid is limited to the minimum necessary for achieving the environmental gain, the aid intensity may amount to up to 100 % of the eligible investment cost as defined in points 80 to 84.
Če je naložbena pomoč odobrena v resnično konkurenčnih postopkih zbiranja ponudb na podlagi jasnih, preglednih in nediskriminatornih meril, kar dejansko zagotavlja, da je pomoč omejena na najmanjši znesek, ki je potreben, da se doseže korist za okolje, lahko intenzivnost pomoči znaša do 100 % upravičenih stroškov naložbe, kakor je opredeljeno v točkah 80 do 84.
Such a bidding process must be non-discriminatory and provide for the participation of a sufficient number of undertakings.
Tak postopek zbiranja ponudb mora biti nediskriminatoren in mora omogočati sodelovanje zadostnega števila podjetij.
In addition, the budget related to the bidding process must be a binding constraint in the sense that not all participants can receive aid.
Poleg tega mora biti proračun v zvezi s postopkom zbiranja ponudb zavezujoča obremenitev v smislu, da vsi upravičenci ne morejo prejeti pomoči.
Finally, the aid must be granted on the basis of the initial bid submitted by the bidder, thus excluding subsequent negotiations.
Končno, pomoč je treba odobriti na podlagi prve ponudbe, ki jo predloži ponudnik, ter s tem preprečiti nadaljnja pogajanja.
Where the investment concerns the acquisition of an eco-innovation asset or the launching of an eco-innovation project, the aid intensity may be increased by 10 percentage points, provided that following conditions are fulfilled:
Če se naložba nanaša na nakup ekološko inovativnega sredstva ali začetek ekološko inovativnega projekta, se lahko intenzivnost pomoči poveča za 10 odstotnih točk, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
the eco-innovation asset or project must be new or substantially improved compared to the state of the art in its industry in the EEA.
ekološko inovativno sredstvo ali projekt mora biti novo ali bistveno izboljšano v primerjavi z najsodobnejšimi v tej industriji v EGP.
The novelty could, for example, be demonstrated by the EFTA States on the basis of a precise description of the innovation and of market conditions for its introduction or diffusion, comparing it with state-of-the-art processes or organisational techniques generally used by other undertakings in the same industry;
Novost lahko države Efte na primer predstavijo na podlagi natančnega opisa inovacije in tržnih pogojev za njeno uvedbo ali razširjanje ter s primerjavo z najsodobnejšimi postopki ali organizacijskimi tehnikami, ki jih navadno uporabljajo druga podjetja v isti industriji;
the expected environmental benefit must be significantly higher than the improvement resulting from the general evolution of the state of the art in comparable activities [47];
pričakovana okoljska korist mora biti bistveno večja od izboljšanja, ki je posledica splošnega razvoja najsodobnejših projektov v primerljivih dejavnostih [47];
the innovative character of these assets or projects involves a clear degree of risk, in technological, market or financial terms, which is higher than the risk generally associated with comparable non-innovative assets or projects.
inovativna narava teh sredstev ali projektov vsebuje jasno stopnjo tveganja v tehnološkem, tržnem ali finančnem smislu, ki je višja od tveganja, ki se običajno povezuje s primerljivimi neinovativnimi sredstvi ali projekti.
This risk could be demonstrated by the EFTA state for instance in terms of: costs in relation to the undertaking’s turnover, time required for the development, expected gains from the eco-innovation in comparison with the costs, probability of failure.
To tveganje lahko države Efte prikažejo na primer v obliki: stroškov v povezavi s prometom družbe, časa, ki je potreben za razvoj, pričakovanih koristi od ekoloških inovacij v primerjavi s stroški, verjetnostjo neuspeha.
Where the investment aid for undertakings going beyond Community standards or increasing the level of environmental protection in the absence of such Community standards is to be given to SMEs, the aid intensity may be increased by 10 percentage points for medium-sized enterprises and by 20 percentage points for small enterprises, as set out in the table.
Če bo pomoč za naložbe za podjetja, ki presegajo standarde Skupnosti ali povečujejo stopnjo varstva okolja v odsotnosti takih standardov, dodeljena malim in srednjim podjetjem, se lahko intenzivnost pomoči poveča za 10 odstotnih točk za srednja podjetja in 20 odstotnih točk za mala podjetja, kot je določeno v razpredelnici.
Aid intensity for aid to undertakings going beyond Community standards or increasing the level of environmental protection in the absence of Community standards
Intenzivnost pomoči za podjetja, ki presegajo standarde Skupnosti ali povečujejo stopnjo varstva okolja v odsotnosti standardov Skupnosti
except for eco-innovation
razen za ekološko inovativnost
in the field of eco-innovation
na področju ekološke inovativnosti
Medium-sized enterprises
Srednja podjetja
Large enterprises
Velika podjetja
Calculation of eligible costs — methodology
Izračun upravičenih stroškov – metodologija
Eligible costs must be limited to the extra investment costs necessary to achieve a higher level of environmental protection than required by the Community standards and will be calculated in two steps.
Upravičeni stroški morajo biti omejeni na dodatne stroške naložbe, ki so nujni za dosego višje stopnje varstva okolja, kot jo zahtevajo standardi Skupnosti, in bodo izračunani v dveh korakih.
First, the cost of the investment directly related to environmental protection will be established by reference to the counterfactual situation, where appropriate.
Najprej se bodo, kadar bo to primerno, stroški naložbe, neposredno povezani z varstvom okolja, določili glede na obratne hipotetične razmere.
Second, operating benefits will be deducted and operating costs will be added.
Nato se bodo odštele ugodnosti poslovanja in prišteli stroški poslovanja.
Identifying the part of the investment directly related to environmental protection:
Določitev dela naložbe, ki je neposredno povezan z varstvom okolja:
where the cost of investing in environmental protection can be easily identified in the total investment cost, this precise environmental protection-related cost constitutes the eligible costs [48];
če je mogoče z lahkoto določiti stroške naložb v varstvo okolja v skupnih stroških naložb, se ta natančni strošek, povezan z varstvom okolja, šteje med upravičene stroške; [48]
in all other cases the extra investment costs must be established by comparing the investment with the counterfactual situation in the absence of State aid.
v vseh drugih primerih je treba dodatne stroške naložbe določiti s primerjavo naložbe in obratnih hipotetičnih razmer v odsotnosti državne pomoči.
The correct counterfactual is the cost of a technically comparable investment that provides a lower degree of environmental protection (corresponding to mandatory Community standards, if they exist) and that would credibly be realised without aid (reference investment).
Pravilne obratne hipotetične razmere so stroški tehnično primerljive naložbe, ki omogoča nižjo stopnjo varstva okolja (ustrezno obveznim standardom Skupnosti, če obstajajo) in ki bi bila verodostojno izvedena brez pomoči (‚referenčna naložba‘).
Technically comparable investment means an investment with the same production capacity and all other technical characteristics (except those directly related to the extra investment for environmental protection).
Tehnično primerljiva naložba pomeni naložbo z isto proizvodno zmogljivostjo in vsemi drugimi tehničnimi značilnostmi (razen tistih, ki se neposredno nanašajo na dodatno naložbo za varstvo okolja).
In addition, such a reference investment must, from a business point of view, be a credible alternative to the investment under assessment.
Poleg tega mora biti tovrstna referenčna naložba s poslovnega vidika verodostojna alternativa naložbe, ki se ocenjuje.
Identifying operating benefits/costs: eligible costs must, unless specified otherwise in this chapter, be calculated net of any operating benefits and operating costs related to the extra investment for environmental protection and arising during the first five years of the life of the investment concerned.
Določitev ugodnosti/stroškov poslovanja: upravičene stroške je treba, razen če je v tem poglavju določeno drugače, izračunati neto brez katerih koli ugodnosti poslovanja in stroškov poslovanja, ki so povezani z dodatno naložbo za varstvo okolja in so nastali v prvih petih letih življenjske dobe zadevne naložbe.
This means that such operating benefits must be deducted and such operating costs may be added to the extra investment costs.
To pomeni, da je treba tovrstne ugodnosti poslovanja odšteti in se lahko tovrstni stroški prištejejo k dodatnim stroškom naložbe.
The eligible investment may take the form of investment in tangible assets and/or in intangible assets.
Upravičena naložba ima lahko obliko naložbe v opredmetena in/ali neopredmetena sredstva.
In the case of investments aiming at obtaining a level of environmental protection higher than Community standards the counterfactual should be chosen as follows:
V primeru naložb, usmerjenih v dosego ravni varstva okolja, ki je višja od standardov Skupnosti, bi bilo treba obratne hipotetične razmere izbrati takole:
where the undertaking is adapting to national standards adopted in the absence of Community standards, the eligible costs consist of the additional investment costs necessary to achieve the level of environmental protection required by the national standards;
če se podjetje prilagaja nacionalnim standardom, sprejetim v odsotnosti standardov Skupnosti, upravičene stroške sestavljajo dodatni stroški naložbe, ki so potrebni za doseganje stopnje varstva okolja, ki jo zahtevajo nacionalni standardi;