natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the Member States clarify their own strategies and implement them in a manner that will complement the objectives of the EMFF; requests that the Commission oversees that the Member States bring extra effort into project evaluation and free themselves from lack of strategic thinking about projects; highlights that there is a need to guarantee that the evaluators assess the projects with open eyes and clear expectations;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, ali bi bilo del Sklada za notranjo varnost, namenjen nadzoru meja in vizumom, koristno razdeliti na več odsekov, ki bodo financirani ločeno: za solidarnost, za konzularno sodelovanje, operacije Frontexa, nujne in posebne ukrepe ter za ukrepe, ki so posebej pomembni z nacionalnega vidika;
Recommends that the funding of projects that have already commenced is reconsidered as it has no additional impact; discourages the Commission and the Member States from carrying out ‘a ticking box exercise’ in order to avoid lack of additional value;
priporoča državam članicam, naj oblikujejo in uporabljajo ustrezne in merljive kazalnike za izložke, izide in učinke financiranih projektov; poudarja, da je treba z visoko kakovostnimi predhodnimi preverjanji zagotoviti, da vsi financirani projekti služijo konkretnim in merljivim ciljem ter imajo dodano vrednost; ugotavlja, da bi naknadna preverjanja prispevala k vzpostavitvi mehanizma za nadzor kakovosti;
Encourages the simplification of administrative procedures to ensure the high quality of projects applying for funding;
poudarja, da se dodana vrednost Unije lahko še poveča z dodatnimi prispevki držav članic k operacijam Frontexa, tako da bi sredstva, ki se sofinancirajo iz njega, obvezno vključili v Frontexov nabor tehnične opreme;
Welcomes the proposal for a new monitoring system in the EMFF that will include a database at Member State level storing information on every operation and an aggregated report with key information, but insists on implementing this proposal and keeping it to high standards;
je zaskrbljen zaradi nepravilnosti, ki jih je Računsko sodišče odkrilo v pravilnikih za javno naročanje v več državah, in poudarja, da se na določbo o izjemah v postopkih javnega naročanja na področju obrambe in varnosti ni dovoljeno sklicevati v primerih, ko bi bili lahko uporabljeni manj omejevalni postopki, ne da bi bila ogrožena varnost; priporoča racionalizacijo postopkov javnih naročil, da bi zagotovili pravočasno izvajanje financiranja;
Part XVII
želi pohvaliti Komisijo, ker je uvedla finančne popravne ukrepe za projekt, ki je kršil temeljne svoboščine in človekove pravice, vendar jo hkrati poziva, naj skuša že vnaprej v čim večji meri opredeliti morebitna tveganja v zvezi s tem, zlasti načinom izvajanja mejnih kontrol v primerih, ko gre za pravico do iskanja azila;
Special Report No 11/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The establishment of the European External Action Service’
poudarja, da je treba izboljšati zbiranje podatkov o financiranih projektih na nacionalni ravni, da bi povečali stopnjo preglednosti;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors' Special Report No 11/2014 and endorses its recommendations;
Del XXII
Is of the opinion that the European External Action Service (EEAS) is not yet a fully-fledged Union diplomatic service because of resources constraints; considers that the Commission and the Member States are the right actors to push for the consolidation of the EEAS;
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 16/2014 z naslovom „Uspešnost kombiniranja nepovratnih sredstev regionalnih naložbenih instrumentov s posojili finančnih institucij pri podpori zunanjim politikam EU“
Points out that the principle of budget neutrality is most welcomed; considers, however, that this should not be viewed in isolation from the savings which the Member States have made by the establishment of the EEAS;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo, namenjeno oceni uspešnosti kombiniranja nepovratnih sredstev regionalnih naložbenih instrumentov s posojili finančnih institucij pri podpori zunanjim politikam EU, ter v nadaljevanju navaja svoje ugotovitve in priporočila;
Considers that the EEAS continues to have a top-heavy administration which needs to be corrected; takes the view that the measures already implemented to correct this matter are in the right path and asks the Commission to strengthen its engagement in improving the inter-service cooperation;
spodbuja Računsko sodišče, naj še razširi revizijske dejavnosti na tem razvijajočem se področju sodelovanja, da bodo imeli oblikovalci politik redno na voljo celovite ocene morebitnih problemov in tveganj;
Considers the responsibilities of the Union Special Representatives to be very unclear, lacking a proper monitoring and performance analysis; suggests that in order to bridge this gap, they are integrated into the EEAS;
se zaveda, da je večje zanimanje za kombiniranje in priložnosti, ki jih ponujajo novi finančni naložbeni instrumenti, v glavnem posledica precejšnjih razvojnih izzivov in zelo omejenih javnih sredstev, kar je privedlo do nastanka novih finančnih virov, ki združujejo nepovratna sredstva Unije in druge oblike financiranja;
Considers positive the developments made in the area of human resources but nevertheless agrees with the Court of Auditors' observations that thematic expertise in the Delegations is most needed; invites the Commission together with the EEAS to put in place a concerted approach to optimise the profile of delegation staff;
poudarja, da morajo biti vsi novi finančni instrumenti in načini kombiniranja v skladu s cilji razvojnih politik Unije, temelječimi na merilih za uradno razvojno pomoč in opredeljenimi v agendi za spremembe, tj. izboljšanjem kakovosti, učinkovitosti, trajnostnosti in hitrosti izvajanja ukrepov Unije; je prepričan, da morajo biti ti instrumenti osredotočeni na prednostne naloge Unije, kjer sta ekonomska in neekonomska dodana vrednost ter učinek največja, in meni, da jih je treba strateško uporabiti v sektorjih, kjer je finančna podpora Unije bistvena za vitalnost naložb in kjer je kombiniranje najbolj koristno; zato obžaluje, da je posebno poročilo posvečeno predvsem finančnim vidikom kombiniranja nepovratnih sredstev regionalnih naložbenih instrumentov, medtem ko njihova učinkovitost in uspešnost nista ustrezno ocenjeni;
Invites the EEAS to get a better overview on the costs incurred in the recruitment procedures; calls on the EEAS to use innovative solutions like videoconferencing for job interviews and to come up, as much as possible, with similar proposals also for the training of staff;
zahteva, da se vedno spoštuje temeljno načelo, po katerem se je treba izogibati tveganju, da bi finančne spodbude prevladale nad razvojnimi načeli (finančni cilji bi utegnili postati pomembnejši kot razvojna vprašanja), in da se spoštuje načela trajnostnega razvoja, na primer socialne in okoljske standarde ter dostopnost osnovnih javnih dobrin;
Encourages the Commission and the Member States to take measures promoting better coordination and cooperation between their external relations services and the EEAS without disregarding the horizontal thematic issues;
je seznanjen z izidi pregleda platforme EU za kombiniranje pri zunanjem sodelovanju, katerega namen je bil povečanje učinkovitosti, uspešnosti in kakovosti obstoječih mehanizmov in možnosti kombiniranja, saj bo harmonizacija ključnih načel, veljavnih za vse regionalne možnosti in finančne instrumente, v novem večletnem finančnem okviru izjemno pomembna; glede na izide povolilnega pregleda večletnega finančnega okvira poziva Komisijo in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj nadaljujeta strukturirani/strateški dialog, zlasti o vprašanju, kako nepretrgoma zagotavljati in povečevati preglednost in odgovornost;
Underlines the need to ensure greater flexibility in the funding of the Common Security and Defence Policy's (CSDP) missions to guarantee the internal and external security of Union due to the danger posed by conflicts in countries which border it, as well as the heightened risk of possible terrorist activities connected to IS;
opominja, da bi se morala Komisija v fazi načrtovanja osredotočiti na doseganje trajnostnih, dolgoročnih, gospodarskih, socialnih in okoljskih ciljev na področjih, kjer se bodo izvajale naložbe;
Urges the EEAS to maximise the benefits of economies of scale by creating new synergies within the EEAS headquarters and delegations as well as in cooperation with Member States and national diplomatic services, in the spirit of a true Union external policy and services; notes with satisfaction that the co-location of Union delegations and Member State diplomatic representations is increasing, even if it continues to be limited, and congratulates the EEAS for considering this matter as primordial in its action;
zahteva spoštovanje temeljnega načela, da se sredstva Unije osredotočijo na projekte, ki jih brez denarja Unije ne bi bilo mogoče uresničiti, na primer tiste, ki niso dobičkonosni, vendar lahko prinesejo izboljšave na področju socialnega varstva, okolja in človekovih pravic;
Accepts that there is still work to be done in relation to consular services;
zahteva spoštovanje temeljnega načela, da je treba nadzirati in spremljati rezultate ter srednje- in dolgoročne učinke projektov na področju socialnega varstva, okolja in človekovih pravic; meni, da je treba ugotovitve v sklopu takšnega ocenjevanja takoj uporabiti za poročanje o doseženih dolgoročnih ciljih ter izboljšanje faze načrtovanja in izbire projektov pri financiranju v prihodnje;
Part XVIII
poziva, da se na tem področju okrepi politična vloga Komisije kot organa s politično odgovornostjo;
Special Report No 12/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Is the ERDF effective in funding projects that directly promote biodiversity under the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020?’
poziva k uvedbi enotnih standardov upravljanja za tovrstne finančne dejavnosti, pa tudi k opredelitvi najboljše prakse ter primernih meril za upravičenost in ocenjevanje teh finančnih orodij; meni, da bodo jasna pravila upravljanja, kot so strukturirano poročanje, nedvoumni okviri za spremljanje in pogoji za nadzor, zmanjšala stroške transakcij in preprečila podvajanje stroškov;
Points out that the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) defines biodiversity as variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; points out, further, that the CBD recognises several major threats to biodiversity such as loss and fragmentation of habitats, overexploitation of forests, oceans, rivers, lakes and soils, pollution, climate change, and incoming species that compete with native flora and fauna;
meni, da je treba nujno zasnovati ustrezne strukture vodenja različnih instrumentov, da se spodbudi občutek odgovornosti zanje pri državah prejemnicah, upravičencih in deležnikih; spominja, da razvoj kombinirane uradne razvojne pomoči, ki se izplačuje prek instrumentov, zahteva dobro strukturirano sodelovanje med Komisijo in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje ter Evropsko investicijsko banko, državami članicami in Parlamentom; poziva k večji udeležbi delegacij Unije pri odločanju, zlasti s prispevki k predhodnim ocenam ali ocenam učinka v fazi identifikacije projektov, pa tudi splošneje z zagotavljanjem vpliva Unije v političnem dialogu s partnerskimi državami in posredovanjem v odnosih z lokalno civilno družbo;
Emphasises that biodiversity is essential for human life and for the wellbeing of societies; emphasises, furthermore, that climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the threats posed by invasive species and the overconsumption of natural resources are major challenges affecting every Union citizen;
vztraja, da je treba doseči najvišjo raven preglednosti in odgovornosti z dostopnostjo izčrpnih in tehtnih proračunskih informacij in finančnih podatkov o projektih, ki se financirajo s temi finančnimi instrumenti, da bi lahko Parlament uveljavljal pristojnosti za nadzor in soglasje; poziva, da se ga redno obvešča o uporabi teh finančnih instrumentov in njihovih rezultatih, zlasti o oceni finančnih in nefinančnih vzvodov ter dodatnosti, hkrati pa opozarja, da je treba spoštovati določbe člena 140 finančne uredbe;
Regrets that the Union has been unable to meet its headline target of curbing biodiversity loss in the Union by 2010;
se strinja s priporočili Računskega sodišča glede učinkovitosti kombiniranja regionalnih naložbenih instrumentov s posojili finančnih institucij v podporo zunanji politiki Unije, saj so prvi korak v pravo smer, in pozdravlja odgovor Komisije, da bo ta priporočila upoštevala;
Notes that economically speaking, the loss of biodiversity is enormously costly to society and that not enough attention has yet been paid to this in global policies; notes, furthermore, that the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity study estimates that the cost of inaction and the deterioration of ecosystem services could amount to as much as 7 % of global GDP per year by 2050 [20];
Del XXIII
Is convinced that there is, therefore, an urgent need to act and attach greater political importance to biodiversity in order to meet the relevant commitments for 2020;
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 17/2014 z naslovom „Ali lahko pobuda za centre odličnosti EU uspešno prispeva k blaženju kemičnih, bioloških, radioloških in jedrskih tveganj iz držav zunaj EU?“
Notes that project outcomes often take a long time to materialise, which makes the assessment of those outcomes difficult;
pozdravlja pobudo o centrih odličnosti na področju kemičnih, bioloških, radioloških in jedrskih snovi (KBRJ); meni, da struktura upravljanja poudarja mrežni značaj pobude;
Takes the view that despite the limitations relating to the low level of funding allocated to biodiversity and to the difficulties involved in assessing the way in which such funding is used, it is essential to maintain the funding at this stage;
pozdravlja v splošnem pozitiven zagon posebnega poročila št. 17/2014 in priporočil Računskega sodišča, ki jih je Komisija brez izjeme sprejela;
Emphasises the fact that protecting biodiversity is not just a noble environmental aim, but that such a policy also has significant potential to create new skills, jobs and business opportunities;
ugotavlja, da pobuda pomeni inovativen pristop, ki zagotavlja mrežna, regionalna in mednarodna partnerstva, pa tudi utrjevanje, usklajevanje in optimizacijo obstoječih zmogljivosti v smislu strokovnega znanja, usposabljanja, tehnične pomoči in opreme;
Emphasises the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection and conservation in the development, setting-up and financing of all other Union policies (including agriculture, forestry, fisheries, regional development and cohesion, energy, industry, transport, tourism, development cooperation and aid, and research and development) so as to make Union sector-specific and budget policies more consistent and to ensure that the Union honours its binding commitments to protect biodiversity; points out, in this context, that cooperation between local, regional, national and Union authorities should be stepped up;
poudarja, da so tovrstne strukture obvezno zapletene, kar pomeni, da jih je težko vzpostaviti in učinkovito izvajati;
Notes that, despite the guidance and impetus provided by the Commission, it is for the Member States alone to set financing priorities in accordance with their own needs, and that the vast majority of Member States does not use the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) as an instrument with which to protect biodiversity;
opozarja, da je imela pobuda v obdobju 2010–2013 na voljo 100 milijonov EUR;
Takes the view, therefore, that given the low take-up rate (0,79 %) there is a need to consider making it mandatory for a proportion of ERDF funding (percentage to be confirmed) to be earmarked for the promotion of biodiversity;
meni, da je največji adut te pobude pristop od spodaj navzgor, kar pomeni, da se opira na izkušnje partnerskih držav; meni, da bi bilo treba redno obveščati delegacije Unije in jih spodbuditi k prevzemu dejavnejše vloge pri posvetovanjih z ustreznimi organi partnerskih držav;
Part XIX
obenem želi poudariti, da lastništvo ustreznih partnerskih držav nad projekti Komisiji ne bi smelo odvračati od priprave predlogov, ki bi jim koristil skupni odziv (npr. pri boju proti izbruhu epidemije ebole);
Special Report No 13/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti’
je prepričan, da bi bilo treba projekte izbirati tako, da bo mogoče omejen znesek, ki je na voljo, usmeriti na področja, ki so najbolj pomembna za varnost Unije; meni, da bi institucije Unije pri izbiri projektov lahko prevzele vlogo klirinške hiše;
Welcomes the Special Report No 13/2014 evaluating the Union support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti as an important contribution to the overall political debate about the Union's external humanitarian and development policies; takes note of the findings and recommendations;
ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba izboljšati tehnično strokovno znanje regionalnih sekretariatov, da bi olajšali prepoznavanje težav, ki jih je treba obravnavati s pobudami, ter izboljšali pripravo in izvajanje posameznih projektov;
Welcomes and takes note of the main conclusions and recommendations of the final report on the evaluation of the Union cooperation with the Republic of Haiti carried out by the Commission's Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development — EuropeAid at the request of the Parliament and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da lahko od maja 2013 partnerske države kadar koli predlagajo projekte, s čimer se je povečala sposobnost odzivanja na razvijajoče se grožnje;
General comments
meni, da bi bilo treba dodatno skrajšati čas, ki preteče od predloga za projekt do njegove odobritve in začetka izvajanja;
Reiterates the overall satisfaction with the work and efforts carried out by the Commission's services in response to the earthquake in Haiti in 2010 and this, in an extremely critical situation for the Union delegation and its staff; welcomes in this respect the Commission's ability to withhold payments and disbursements as a consequence to unsatisfactory progress in the Government's financial management and deficiencies in national public procurement procedures;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba z obsežnejšim strateškim sodelovanjem izboljšati skladnost in usklajevanje različnih instrumentov financiranja na področju varnosti; poudarja, da bi z natančnejšim usklajevanjem med ustreznimi akterji na področju KBJR povečali učinkovitost obstoječih pobud;
Regrets the weaknesses identified in the coordination between donors and within the Commission's services as also elaborated by an evaluation of the Union's cooperation with the Republic of Haiti (2008-2012) [21], which was issued on behalf of the Commission; calls, in this respect, for a better articulation of the humanitarian aid and development aid with a stronger link between relief, rehabilitation and development by means of a permanent LRRD (linking of relief, rehabilitation and development) framework; considers that integrated approaches with clearly stated coordination objectives and a coherent country strategy between the Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department (ECHO) and EuropeAid, alongside the sharing of best practices, have to be set up wherever possible; welcomes, in this respect, the inclusion of the systematic integration of the LRRD approach in the funding cycle covering the period 2014-20; calls furthermore on the Commission's services to improve the transition from short-term humanitarian activities to long-term development interventions and to develop a coherent coordination, not only among different Union actors but also with national priorities through a common strategy by means of a joint humanitarian and development framework; invites the Commission to enter into a dialogue with Parliament if an effective coordination among the various financial instruments in humanitarian and development aid is hindered by the existing legal framework; believes furthermore that the involvement of local civil society non-governmental organisations can strengthen the use of the local knowledge base in order to better identify rehabilitation needs and to supervise progress achieved by national authorities;
meni, da bi utegnilo pobudi prinesti koristi jasnejše razlikovanje med notranjo in zunanjo razsežnostjo ukrepov KBJR [22];
Recalls the recommendations in the aftermath of the visit by the delegation of Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control to Haiti in February 2012 and insists, as a constant principle, on the salient issue of traceability and accountability of Union development funds, in particular by linking budget support to performance, in particular with a clear definition of obligations and duties in the national administration to ensure adequate transparency, traceability and accountability; reiterates its call for putting more emphasis on the fight against endemic corruption; points out that humanitarian aid should be based on an exit strategy and stresses that funds should be channelled through the Haitian institutions whenever possible, within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement, in order to ensure ownership and to support the strengthening of the national organs, including the Procurement Agency, which should act as a control filter; invites the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) to emphasise the conditionality matrix for sectorial budget support;
Del XXIV
Recalls that ‘State building’ is at the centre of the Union development strategy and the cornerstone of any such crisis situation, in line with the principles for intervention in fragile contexts; notes that this includes supporting institutional building, the transparency and efficiency of public financial management, budgetary allocations and effectiveness of public expenditure, with reinforced political and policy dialogues;
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 19/2014 z naslovom „Predpristopna pomoč EU Srbiji“
Calls for the definition of a good policy mix in the logic of the Union intervention through a comprehensive approach to state and non-state/non-governmental stakeholders and to the sectors support to be provided through rapid sectorial needs assessment and this, to the benefit of the viability, complementarity and sustainability of projects;
poziva srbske organe, naj izboljšajo kakovost nacionalnih strategij in akcijskih načrtov, jih dodatno racionalizirajo ter ustrezno obravnavajo različna politična in družbeno-gospodarska vprašanja; poziva Komisijo, naj bo po potrebi pripravljena zagotavljati potrebno tehnično podporo v zvezi s tem;
Orientations for the future
poudarja, kako pomembno je pripraviti nacionalne strategije na politično občutljivih področjih; poziva ustrezne organe, naj na naslednjih osrednjih področjih upravljanja pripravijo strategije in vključijo realističen časovni okvir za začetek njihovega izvajanja: ozemeljska decentralizacija in strategija za usklajevanje reforme vodenja javnih financ;
Considers that beyond the Haitian situation, measures need to be discussed and improved in order to strengthen the policy framework of intervention and disaster risk reduction with the ultimate purpose of limiting the risk for human lives and their human living conditions to a minimum; believes that investment in disaster risk reduction is crucial as a full component of sustainable development, as well as highly cost-effective, as it allows for a significantly more efficient and effective use of resources than paying the bill for disaster response;
poziva Komisijo in delegacijo Unije v Srbiji, naj v prihodnje preprečita težave, do katerih je prišlo v prvem delu programskega obdobja 2007–2013 zaradi izbire nedozorelih ali težavnih projektov; podpira sodelovanje Komisije in srbskih organov pri obravnavi odkritih težav, tudi pri pomanjkanju podpore nacionalnih organov, pomanjkanju medinstitucionalnega usklajevanja, slabi zasnovi projektov, neustrezni opredelitvi v smislu referenc, netrajnostnih rešitev financiranja in nepripravljenosti učenja iz napak, storjenih pri prejšnjih projektih;