natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes that the Court of Auditors covers procurement procedures as part of its annual audits of the Agencies; supports the Court of Auditors in its role as external auditor, with a view to ensuring that it does its utmost to obtain the fullest possible information on procurement procedures to establish that the Agencies’ calls for preparation, publication, evaluation and contract management phases respect in full the principle of maximum and open competition and the principle of value-for-money and that the Court of Auditors can verify the real turnover of the companies contracted by each Agency in order to ensure that the turnover is not related to changes occurring in the contractors’ official name;
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče v okviru letne revizije agencij pregleduje tudi postopke javnih naročil; podpira Računsko sodišče v vlogi zunanjega revizorja z namenom, da bi naredilo vse, kar je mogoče, da bi pridobilo čim več informacij o postopkih javnih naročil, da bo lahko ugotovilo, ali so agencije v fazah priprave in objave razpisov ter ocenjevanja in upravljanja pogodb docela upoštevale načelo čim večje in odprte konkurence in načelo stroškovne učinkovitosti, ter preverilo dejanski promet podjetij, s katerimi agencije sklepajo pogodbe, da bi zagotovilo, da ni povezan s spremembami v uradnem imenu pogodbenika;
Asks the Court of Auditors, as the relevant data accrue in the process of auditing, to provide a public database including, inter alia, the following in an easily accessible format (e.g. Excel files and/or CSV files):
ker se ustrezni podatki v postopku revizije kopičijo, poziva Računsko sodišče, naj pripravi javno podatkovno zbirko, ki bi med drugim vključevala naslednje podatke v zlahka dostopni obliki zapisa (npr. datoteke Excel in/ali CSV):
budget commitments made in the last three months of the year,
proračunske obveznosti, prevzete v zadnjih treh mesecih leta,
appropriations carried-over in relation to the Agencies’ budget,
prenesena sredstva glede na proračun agencij,
discrepancy between the Agencies’ estimated (ex-ante) and actual (ex-post) appropriations carried over,
razliko med predvidenimi (predhodna ocena) in dejansko (naknadna ocena) prenesenimi sredstvi,
average cash-holding per month,
povprečni gotovinski saldo na mesec,
cancelled appropriations in relation to average cash holdings over the year,
stornirana proračunska sredstva glede na povprečni gotovinski saldo skozi vse leto,
interest earnings relative to Agencies’ average cash holdings,
prihodke od obresti glede na povprečni gotovinski saldo agencij,
average cash holdings in relation to average expenses per day,
povprečni gotovinski saldo glede na povprečne dnevne izdatke,
unique users on Agencies’ website and publications/press releases made by the Agencies in relation to resources allocated to public relations,
posamezne obiskovalce spletnih mest agencij in objave/tiskovna sporočila agencij glede na sredstva, dodeljena za stike z javnostjo;
urges, therefore, the Agencies to provide the Court of Auditors with the necessary data and estimates in a timely manner;
zato poziva agencije, naj Računskemu sodišču pravočasno posredujejo potrebne podatke in ocene;
Asks the Court of Auditors to compose an openly accessible and transparent ranking procedure for Agencies by using important indicators in the fields of good financial and budgetary management, low governance costs as well as efficient operational effectiveness and provide the underlying data in an easily accessible format (e.g. Excel-files and/or CSV files);
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj pripravi prosto dostopen in pregleden razvrstitveni postopek za agencije, pri čemer naj uporabi pomembne kazalnike s področja dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in proračunskega upravljanja, nizkih stroškov upravljanja ter učinkovitosti poslovanja, podatke pa da na voljo v zlahka dostopni obliki zapisa (npr. datoteke Excel in/ali CSV);
Reports on the Annual Account by the Court of Auditors
Poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih
Recalls that in the previous discharges of the Agencies, the discharge authority called on the Court of Auditors to provide further information on:
ponovno opozarja, da je organ za podelitev razrešnice v predhodnih razrešnicah za agencije zaprosil Računsko sodišče za nadaljnje informacije o:
the efficiency of the internal control systems of each Agency,
učinkovitosti sistemov notranje kontrole posamezne agencije,
the potential conflicts of interest in the Agencies,
morebitnem navzkrižju interesov v agencijah,
an evaluation of the AAR of each Agency,
oceni letnega poročila o dejavnostih posamezne agencije,
the Agencies’ performance;
uspešnosti agencij;
Welcomes that the Court of Auditors provided in its evaluation of Agencies’ AARs a specific annexed table containing a comparison of 2009 versus 2010 operations thus providing information to the public in relation to these activities;
je zadovoljen, da je Računsko sodišče k svoji oceni letnih poročil o dejavnostih agencij priložilo posebno tabelo s primerjavo dejavnosti v letih 2009 in 2010 ter tako javnosti zagotovilo podatke o teh dejavnostih;
Recalls that the Court of Auditors acts as an external independent controlling authority to satisfy the European citizens’ right to know how their money is spent and how the Agencies are managed; recalls, in this context, that the Agencies serve the public interest and should be accountable to the citizens whose interest must be served; calls on the Court of Auditors to provide the discharge authority with the fullest possible details of the action taken on earlier audits and of the irregularities that the Court does not consider sufficiently major to warrant a mention, in order to assist the discharge authority in its task of exercising oversight over the Agencies;
se boji, da Računsko sodišče ni delovalo kot neodvisen zunanji nadzorni organ, ki bi moral zadostiti pravici evropskih državljanov, da so obveščeni o tem, kako se troši njihov denar in kako se upravljajo agencije; pri tem opozarja, da agencije služijo javnemu interesu in da bi morale odgovarjati državljanom, interesu katerih morajo služiti; želi, da bi Računsko sodišče organ za podelitev razrešnice čim podrobneje obveščalo o nadaljnjih ukrepih po predhodnih revizijah, pa tudi o nepravilnostih, za katere meni, da niso tako pomembne, da bi jih bilo treba omeniti, saj bi tako organu za podelitev razrešnice pomagalo pri njegovi vlogi nadzora nad agencijami;
Two Special Reports of the Court of Auditors: one planned, but not performed, the second to come during 2012
Dve posebni poročili Računskega sodišča: načrtovano, ki ni bilo pripravljeno, in drugo, ki je predvideno za leto 2012
Is concerned that, despite the Court of Auditors’ information provided in its 2011 AWP and the persistent requests from Parliament, the Special Report on cost-benchmarking of the Agencies has not been delivered; acknowledges the Court of Auditors’ efforts to provide Parliament with information dealing with cost-benchmarking of the Agencies; is however surprised that on 15 February 2012 the President of the Court of Auditors sent a letter with an annex to the President of Parliament stating basically that the annex (i) is not the Special Report on cost benchmarking of the Agencies, (ii) is of a non-public nature and (iii) that it could be used for the 2011 discharge, although the data in the annex cover 2008-2010; regrets that the Court of Auditors does not intend to issue the Special Report on the cost-benchmarking of the Agencies as stated in the Court’s letter to the discharge authority on 18 April 2012;
je zaskrbljen, ker posebno poročilo o agencijah s primerjalno analizo njihovih stroškov kljub obljubam Računskega sodišča v letnem delovnem programu za leto 2011 in vztrajnim zahtevam Parlamenta ni na voljo; je seznanjen s prizadevanji Računskega sodišča, da bi Parlamentu posredovalo informacije o primerjalni analizi stroškov agencij; je kljub temu presenečen, da je predsednik Računskega sodišča 15. februarja 2012 predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta poslal pismo s prilogo ter navedel, da priloga (i) ni posebno poročilo o primerjalni analizi stroškov agencij, (ii) da ni javne narave, ter (iii) da jo je mogoče uporabiti za postopek razrešnice za leto 2011, čeprav se podatki v njej nanašajo na obdobje 2008–2010; obžaluje, da Računsko sodišče ne namerava izdati posebnega poročila o primerjalni analizi stroškov agencij, kot je razvidno iz pisma Računskega sodišča z dne 18. aprila 2012 organu za podelitev razrešnice;
Notes that the Court of Auditors will publish a Special Report on conflicts of interest management in the Agencies by the end of June 2012; being concerned that several Agencies are repeatedly challenged over cases involving conflicts of interest, welcomes this decision and urges the Court of Auditors to enhance its efforts to issue this Special Report within the planed timeframe);
ugotavlja, da bo Računsko sodišče do konca junija 2012 objavilo posebno poročilo o upravljanju navzkrižja interesov v agencijah; glede na to, da se številne agencije vedno znova soočajo z obtožbami zaradi navzkrižja interesov, pozdravlja to odločitev in poziva Računsko sodišče, naj si bolj prizadeva, da bo omenjeno posebno poročilo objavilo v načrtovanem roku;
Externalisation of the Court of Auditors’ audits on the Agencies
Zunanje izvajanje revizij Računskega sodišča v agencijah Unije
Considers that, if private sector auditors have to be involved in the external audit of Agencies’ accounts, the selection and appointment of the private auditors should be done in conformity with the applicable rules, including those on transparent public procurement, and appropriate control mechanisms should be put in place, in order to ensure that work on the legality and regularity of revenue and expenditure and the reliability of Agencies’ accounts is carried out in accordance with the required standards; considers also that aspects of such outsourced external audits, including the reported audit findings, have to remain the full responsibility of the Court of Auditors, which will have to manage all administrative and procurement procedures required and finance these from its own budget without asking for a supplementary budget, as this task is under the Court of Auditors competence; moreover, the current crisis does not allow for additional budgets to perform tasks which are under one Union institution, in this case the Court of Auditors;
meni, da je treba revizorje iz zasebnega sektorja vključiti v zunanje revizije računovodskih izkazov agencij, da bi morala izbor in imenovanje zasebnih revizorjev potekati v skladu z veljavnimi pravili, tudi tistimi o preglednih javnih naročilih, in da je treba uporabiti ustrezne mehanizme kontrole, da bi ugotavljanje zakonitosti in pravilnosti prihodkov in odhodkov ter zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov agencij potekalo v skladu z zahtevanimi standardi; meni tudi, da mora Računsko sodišče še naprej v celoti odgovarjati za nekatere vidike teh zunanjih revizij, vključno s sporočenimi ugotovitvami teh revizij, ter voditi vse potrebne upravne postopke in postopke javnih poročil in jih financirati s svojim proračunom, ne da bi zahtevalo dodatnega, saj je ta naloga v njegovi pristojnosti; poleg tega zaradi sedanje krize ni na voljo dodatnih sredstev za izvedbo nalog, za katere je pristojna ena od institucij Unij, v tem primeru Računsko sodišče;
Urges the Court of Auditors to prevent any conflicts of interest when contracting an independent audit for the Agencies;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj pri sklepanju pogodb z neodvisnimi revizorji za agencije preprečuje morebitna navzkrižja interesov;
Considers also that if such outsourcing is to be used, the report of the independent auditors must be made public immediately by both the independent auditors and the Court of Auditors; to this end, the Parliament requires the Court of Auditors to abstain from imposing confidential clauses on the contract with the eventual independent contractor with regard to the publication of the reports in the form they are done by the independent contractor; at the same time, the Court of Auditors must take the responsibility of this independent audit and act accordingly;
meni, da morata neodvisni revizor in Računsko sodišče v primeru zunanjega izvajanja nemudoma objaviti poročilo neodvisnih revizorjev; zato Parlament od Računskega sodišča zahteva, da se v pogodbi s posameznimi neodvisnimi pogodbeniki vzdrži uporabe klavzule o zaupnosti glede objave poročil v obliki, kot jih je pripravil neodvisni pogodbenik; hkrati mora Računsko sodišče prevzeti odgovornost za to neodvisno revizijo in ustrezno ravnati;
AGENCIES’ GOVERNANCE
UPRAVLJANJE AGENCIJ
Notes that the large size of certain Agencies’ governing boards and the nature and high turnover of their members can lead to an ineffective decision-making body; calls, accordingly, on the IWG on Agencies to address this issue together with a re-evaluation of the nature of their members status, scope of competences and conflict of interest related matters; suggests in addition that consideration be given to the possibility of merging governing boards for Agencies working in related fields to reduce meeting costs;
ugotavlja, da lahko velikost upravnega odbora nekaterih agencij ter narava in velike spremembe v njegovi sestavi povzročijo, da postane ta organ odločanja neučinkovit; zato medinstitucionalno delovno skupino za agencije poziva k obravnavi tega vprašanja skupaj s ponovno oceno zadev, povezanih s statusom, pristojnostmi in navzkrižjem interesov članov; predlaga tudi, da se preuči možnost združitve upravnih odborov agencij, ki delujejo na sorodnih področjih, da se tako zmanjšajo stroški sestankov;
Notes the responsibility that the Management Boards have for the management and supervision of the Agencies; takes the view that some Management Board’s decisions, such as to reject one or more of the Internal Auditor’s recommendations without good reason, can have an adverse effect on the way in which an Agency is run; calls for the Commission’s position within the Agencies’ Management Boards to be reviewed so that it may be given a right to vote and to constitute a ‘blocking minority’ on decisions relating to budgetary, financial and administrative management; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to notify the discharge authority of any decisions taken by Management Boards that are at odds with the principle of sound budgetary and financial management of Agencies or with the Financial Regulation;
se zaveda odgovornosti, ki jo pri upravljanju in nadzoru agencij nosi upravni odbor; meni, da lahko določene odločitve upravnega odbora negativno vplivajo na upravljanje agencije, na primer neupoštevanje enega ali več priporočil notranjega revizorja brez veljavne utemeljitve; poziva k ponovni presoji položaja Komisije v upravnih odborih agencij, da bi ta dobila glasovalno pravico in vlogo manjšinskega člana, ki lahko prepreči sprejetje odločitev o proračunskih, finančnih in upravnih zadevah; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o odločitvah, ki jih je sprejel upravni odbor, vendar bi lahko bile v nasprotju z načelom dobrega proračunskega in finančnega poslovodenja agencije ali finančno uredbo;
Welcomes the fact that steps have been taken to respond to the suggestions made by the Court of Auditors concerning the introduction of closer monitoring and control of transfers of appropriations, and expects, in addition, that in the future the Agencies’ budgets will continue to be subject to close scrutiny; takes the view that problems related to activity-based budgeting occur due to practical difficulties to separate staff, administrative and operating expenditure where the activity areas cover information, consultancy services and confidence-building measures;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so bili sprejeti ukrepi v odgovor na predloge Računskega sodišča glede natančnejšega spremljanja in nadzora prerazporeditev proračunskih sredstev, in poleg tega pričakuje, da bodo proračuni agencij tudi v prihodnje predmet strogega nadzora; meni, da zapleti, povezani z oblikovanjem proračuna na osnovi dejavnosti, nastanejo zaradi praktičnih težav pri ločevanju odhodkov za zaposlene, upravo in poslovanje, kjer področja dejavnosti zajemajo obveščanje, svetovanje in ukrepe za krepitev zaupanja;
Calls on the Agencies to indicate staff numbers, including contract staff, in a more transparent manner in their activity reports; awaits the agreement of the IWG on Agencies as this will give considerable input into the Agencies’ budgeting and operating;
poziva agencije, naj v poročilih o dejavnostih pregledneje navedejo število zaposlenih, vključno s pogodbenimi uslužbenci; pričakuje dogovor o medinstitucionalni delovni skupini za agencije, saj bo to pomemben prispevek k pripravi proračuna agencij in njihovemu delovanju;
Notes with concern that for eight Agencies, i.e. CEPOL, ECHA, EFSA, EMCDDA, EMSA, ETF, FRA and Frontex, in 2010 the Management Board cost on average per meeting and per member between EUR 1017 and EUR 6175; is of the opinion that these costs are excessive and need to be reduced drastically;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da so v osmih agencijah, tj. CEPOL, ECHA, EFSA, EMCDDA, EMSA, ETF, FRA in Frontex, v letu 2010 stroški upravnega odbora na posamezno sejo in člana v povprečju znašali med 1017 EUR in 6175 EUR; meni, da so ti stroški pretirani in da jih je treba korenito zmanjšati;
Administrative support
Upravna podpora
Calls, in addition, on the Agencies to envisage the following options when considering the possibility of administrative support to operate in the most efficient manner:
agencije tudi poziva, naj pri obravnavi možnosti za čim bolj učinkovito upravno podporo razmislijo o naslednjih možnostih:
merging smaller Agencies in order to achieve savings and stop and/or avoid overlapping objectives, and prevent further spending of the Union budget,
združitvi manjših agencij, da se ustvarijo prihranki in odpravi in/ali prepreči prekrivanje ciljev ter nadaljnja poraba proračunskih sredstev Unije,
sharing services between Agencies, either by proximity of locations or by policy area; praises in this respect the EMSA-CFCA initiative of sharing the Internal Audit function; however, considers this as a start to be continued by restructuring and merging which will include the Agencies;
skupnih storitvah agencij, ki so si blizu po lokaciji ali tematskem področju; v tem pogledu odobrava pobudo agencij EMSA in CFCA, da si delita funkcijo notranje revizije; vendar meni, da je to šele začetek, slediti pa bi moralo prestrukturiranje in združevanje, ki bo veljalo za vse agencije;
Calls on the Commission and/or the Court of Auditors to carry out an evaluation on all the Agencies to detect and analyse:
poziva Komisijo in/ali Računsko sodišče, naj opravita oceno vseh agencij, da bi opredelila in analizirala:
the potential synergies and occurrences of unnecessary or overlapping activities of Agencies,
morebitne sinergije ter nepotrebne ali prekrivajoče se dejavnosti agencij,
unnecessary high levels of overhead due to seat location,
po nepotrebnem visoke stroške zaradi lokacije sedeža,
and to prepare a comprehensive costs and benefits and impact assessment analysing the merger or closure of some of the Agencies if the added-value or effectiveness of the single agency is not sufficient, and to inform Parliament about this issue in due time for the 2011 discharge;
poziva ju tudi, naj pripravita obsežno analizo stroškov in koristi ter oceno učinka morebitne združitve oziroma zaprtja nekaterih agencij, če dodana vrednost ali učinkovitost posamezne agencije ni zadostna, ter Parlamentu poročata o tem vprašanju pravočasno za postopek razrešnice za leto 2011;
Urges the Commission and the Council to take into account the real necessity of each Agency and the need to save Union tax-payers’ money in this time of financial and economic crisis, and not take into account some Member States’ interests to have an Agency in their particular country for reasons other than the public interest of the Union;
odločno poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj upoštevata dejanske potrebe posameznih agencij ter nujnost varčne porabe denarja davkoplačevalcev Unije v časih finančne in gospodarske krize in naj ne upoštevata interesov nekaterih držav članic, ki bi želele imeti agencijo v svoji državi zaradi interesov, ki se ne skladajo z javnim interesom Unije;
Disciplinary procedure
Disciplinski postopek
Recalls once more that Parliament, since its 2006 discharge resolution, called on the Agencies to consider setting up an inter-Agency disciplinary board to apply, in an impartial manner, disciplinary sanctions up to exclusion; notes that this project remains difficult to take forward; calls on the Agency responsible for coordinating the network of Agencies to establish a network of staff at the grade required to be impartial members of the disciplinary board;
ponovno opozarja, da Parlament agencije že od resolucije o razrešnici v letu 2006 poziva, naj razmislijo o vzpostavitvi medagencijskega disciplinskega odbora, ki bi disciplinske ukrepe vse do izključitve sprejemal nepristransko; ugotavlja, da se pri uresničevanju tega projekta pojavljajo težave; poziva agencijo, pristojno za koordinacijo mreže agencij, naj vzpostavi mrežo uslužbencev, ki bodo v primernem razredu, da lahko postanejo nepristranski člani disciplinskega odbora;
REFLECTION ON AGENCIES: A COMMON APPROACH
RAZMISLEK O AGENCIJAH: SKUPNI PRISTOP
Welcomes the ongoing work of the IWG on Agencies which has the objective of reviewing the role and position of decentralised Agencies in the Union’s institutional landscape, as well as the creation, structure and operation of those Agencies, together with funding, budgetary, supervision and management issues; requests the IWG to come up with a draft proposal on Common Understanding between Parliament, Council and Commission on Agencies;
pozdravlja potekajoče delo medinstitucionalne delovne skupine za agencije, katere cilj je pregledati vlogo in položaj decentraliziranih agencij v institucionalnem okolju Unije ter ustanovitev, strukturo in delovanje teh agencij skupaj s finančnimi, proračunskimi, nadzornimi in upravljavskimi vprašanji; od delovne skupine zahteva, da oblikuje osnutek predloga o skupnem pristopu Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije do agencij;
Calls on the Commission to elaborate options on how professional management for cash held by the Agencies could be organised and implemented;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, kako bi bilo mogoče organizirati in izvajati strokovno poslovanje z gotovino v agencijah;
Asks the IWG to identify areas of duplication and overlap amongst existing Agencies and to consider whether some Agencies could be merged;
poziva medinstitucionalno delovno skupino, naj opredeli področja, na katerih se dejavnosti obstoječih agencij podvajajo ali prekrivajo, ter razmisli, ali bi bilo mogoče nekatere agencije združiti;
Believes that Agencies would benefit from shared administrative services in a similar way to the cooperation between the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee; urges the IWG to consider the question of the geographic dispersal of the Agencies which adds significantly to their costs and makes cooperation difficult; believes that if the Agencies were grouped together in a small number of locations, they could share overheads and management costs, particularly regarding IT, personnel, and financial administration;
meni, da bi agencijam koristile skupne upravne storitve, podobno kot poteka sodelovanje med Odborom regij in Evropskim ekonomsko-socialnim odborom; poziva medinstitucionalno delovno skupino, naj obravnava vprašanje geografske razpršitve agencij, ki znatno prispeva k stroškom in otežuje sodelovanje; meni, da bi lahko agencije, če bi bile združene na manjšem številu krajev, delile skupne stroške in stroške upravljanja, predvsem kar zadeva informacijsko tehnologijo, kadrovske vire in finančno upravljanje;