natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
GEOGRAPHICAL ZONES AND CURRENT (2003) TAX RATES
GEOGRAFSKE CONE IN SEDANJE PRISPEVNE STOPNJE (2003)
Zone I: 14,1 % tax.
Cona I: 14,1-odstotna prispevna stopnja
This zone includes all municipalities not mentioned below under zones II to V.
Ta cona zajema vse občine, ki niso navedene spodaj pod conami II–V.
Zone II: 10,6 % tax.
Cona II: 10,6-odstotna prispevna stopnja
This zone includes:
Ta cona zajema:
in Nord-Trøndelag county, the municipalities of Meråker, Frosta, Leksvik, Mosvik, Verran,
v okrožju Nord-Trøndelag: občine Meråker, Frosta, Leksvik, Mosvik, Verran,
in Sør-Trøndelag county, the municipalities of Ørland, Agdenes, Rissa, Bjugn, Rennebu, Meldal, Midtre Gauldal, Selbu,
v okrožju Sør-Trøndelag: občine Ørland, Agdenes, Rissa, Bjugn, Rennebu, Meldal, Midtre Gauldal, Selbu,
in Møre og Romsdal county, the municipalities of Vanylven, Sande, Herøy, Norddal, Stranda, Stordal, Rauma, Nesset, Midsund, Sandøy, Gjemnes, Tingvoll, Sunndal, Haram, Aukra, Eide,
v okrožju Møre og Romsdal: občine Vanylven, Sande, Herøy, Norddal, Stranda, Stordal, Rauma, Nesset, Midsund, Sandøy, Gjemnes, Tingvoll, Sunndal, Haram, Aukra, Eide,
in Sogn og Fjordane county, all municipalities,
v okrožju Sogn og Fjordane: vse občine,
in Hordaland county, the municipalities of Etne, Ølen, Tysnes, Kvinnherad, Jondal, Odda, Ullensvang, Eidfjord, Ulvik, Granvin, Kvam, Modalen, Fedje, Masfjorden, Bømlo,
v okrožju Hordaland: občine Etne, Ølen, Tysnes, Kvinnherad, Jondal, Odda, Ullensvang, Eidfjord, Ulvik, Granvin, Kvam, Modalen, Fedje, Masfjorden, Bømlo,
in Rogaland county, the municipalities of Hjelmeland, Suldal, Sauda, Kvitsøy, Utsira, Vindafjord, Finnøy,
v okrožju Rogaland: občine Hjelmeland, Suldal, Sauda, Kvitsøy, Utsira, Vindafjord, Finnøy,
in Vest-Agder county, the municipalities of Åseral, Audnedal, Hægebostad, Sirdal,
v okrožju Vest-Agder: občine Åseral, Audnedal, Hægebostad, Sirdal,
in Aust-Agder county, the municipalities of Gjerstad, Vegårshei, Åmli, Iveland, Evje og Hornnes, Bygland, Valle, Bykle,
v okrožju Aust-Agder: občine Gjerstad, Vegårshei, Åmli, Iveland, Evje og Hornnes, Bygland, Valle, Bykle,
in Telemark county, the municipalities of Drangedal, Tinn, Hjartdal, Seljord, Kviteseid, Nissedal, Fyresdal, Tokke, Vinje, Nome,
v okrožju Telemark: občine Drangedal, Tinn, Hjartdal, Seljord, Kviteseid, Nissedal, Fyresdal, Tokke, Vinje, Nome,
in Buskerud county, the municipalities of Flå, Nes, Gol, Hemsedal, Ål, Hol, Sigdal, Rollag, Nore and Uvdal,
v okrožju Buskerud: občine Flå, Nes, Gol, Hemsedal, Ål, Hol, Sigdal, Rollag, Nore and Uvdal,
in Oppland county, the municipalities of Nord-Fron, Sør-Fron, Ringebu, Gausdal, Søndre Land, Nordre Land,
v okrožju Oppland: občine Nord-Fron, Sør-Fron, Ringebu, Gausdal, Søndre Land, Nordre Land,
in Hedmark county, the municipalities of Nord-Odal, Eidskog, Grue, Åsnes, Våler, Trysil, Åmot.
v okrožju Hedmark: občine Nord-Odal, Eidskog, Grue, Åsnes, Våler, Trysil, Åmot.
Zone III: 6,4 % tax.
Cona III: 6,4-odstotna prispevna stopnja
in Nord-Trøndelag county, the municipality of Snåsa,
v okrožju Nord-Trøndelag: občino Snåsa,,
in Sør-Trøndelag county, the municipalities of Hemne, Snillfjord, Oppdal, Røros, Holtålen, Tydal,
v okrožju Sør-Trøndelag: občine Hemne, Snillfjord, Oppdal, Røros, Holtålen, Tydal,
in Oppland county, the municipalities of Dovre, Lesja, Skjåk, Lom, Vågå, Sel, Sør-Aurdal, Etnedal, Nord-Aurdal, Vestre Slidre, Øystre Slidre, Vang,
v okrožju Oppland: občine Dovre, Lesja, Skjåk, Lom, Vågå, Sel, Sør-Aurdal, Etnedal, Nord-Aurdal, Vestre Slidre, Øystre Slidre, Vang,
in Hedmark county, the municipalities of Stor-Elvdal, Rendalen, Engerdal, Tolga, Tynset, Alvdal, Folldal, Os,
v okrožju Hedmark: občine Stor-Elvdal, Rendalen, Engerdal, Tolga, Tynset, Alvdal, Folldal, Os.
Zone IV: 5,1 % tax.
Cona IV: 5,1-odstotna prispevna stopnja
in Troms county, municipalities not included among those listed below under zone V,
v okrožju Troms: občine, ki niso zajete v seznamu pod cono V spodaj,
in Nordland county, all municipalities,
v okrožju Nordland: vse občine,
in Nord-Trøndelag county, the municipalities of Namsos, Namdalseid, Lierne, Røyrvik, Namsskogan, Grong, Høylandet, Overhalla, Fosnes, Flatanger, Vikna, Nærøy, Leka,
v okrožju Nord-Trøndelag: občine Namsos, Namdalseid, Lierne, Røyrvik, Namsskogan, Grong, Høylandet, Overhalla, Fosnes, Flatanger, Vikna, Nærøy, Leka,
in Sør-Trøndelag county, the municipalities of Hitra, Frøya, Åfjord, Roan, Osen,
v okrožju Sør-Trøndelag: občine Hitra, Frøya, Åfjord, Roan, Osen,
in Møre og Romsdal county, the municipality of Smøla.
v okrožju Møre og Romsdal: občina Smøla.
Zone V: 0 % tax.
Cona V: 0-odstotna prispevna stopnja
in Finnmark county, all municipalities,
v okrožju Finnmark: vse občine,
in Troms county, the municipalities of Karlsøy, Lyngen, Storfjord, Kåfjord, Skjervøy, Nordreisa and Kvænangen.
v okrožju Troms: občine Karlsøy, Lyngen, Storfjord, Kåfjord, Skjervøy, Nordreisa in Kvænangen.
The EFTA Court stated in Case E-6/98 [14], paragraph 43, that: ‘the Norwegian social security contribution scheme constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 61 EEA. ’For the purpose of assessing whether the notification of a transitional arrangement in zones 3 and 4 involves State aid, it is noted that the main principles of the scheme have not changed compared to the scheme which was subject to the EFTA Court's judgment in Case E-6/98.
Sodišče EFTA je v Primeru E-6/98 [14], odstavek 43, navedlo: „Norveški sistem prispevkov za socialno varnost pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 61 EGP.“ Za presojo, ali priglasitev prehodne ureditve v conah 3 in 4 zajema državno pomoč, je ugotovljeno, da se glavna načela sistema niso spremenila v primerjavi s sistemom, ki je bil predmet sodbe Sodišča EFTA v Primeru E-6/98.
See for example Commission Decision No 88/318/EEC of 2 March 1988 on Law No 64 of 1 March 1986 on aid to the Mezzogiorno (OJ L 143, 10.06.1988, p. 37); State aid No 586/2002 — Italy — Aid measures in favour of cableway installations introduced with L.R. 9/98, Regione Lombardia.
Glej na primer: Sklep Komisije št. 88/318/EGS z dne 2. marca 1988 o zakonu št. 64 z dne 1. marca 1986 o pomoči za Južno Italijo (UL L 143, 10.6.1988, str. 37); Državna pomoč št. 586/2002 – Italija – Ukrepi pomoči za žičniške naprave, uvedeni z L. R. 9/98, Regione Lombardia.
However, the requirement of such adverse economic effects to a region as a whole must be set high, since financial consequences of negative State aid decisions for single undertakings do not have any bearing on the compatibility assessment of a particular aid measure [19].In the light of the above, the Authority will assess whether the notified transition period of three years for zones 3 and 4 is objectively necessary and justified in order to allow an appropriate transition for the undertakings in question to the adjusted situation [20].3.2. Is a transition period of three years for zones 3 and 4 necessary and justified?
Vendar je treba določiti visoko zahtevano stopnjo takih negativnih gospodarskih učinkov za regijo kot celoto, saj finančne posledice negativnih odločitev o državni pomoči za eno podjetje nimajo nobenega vpliva na presojo združljivosti določenega ukrepa pomoči [19].Glede na navedeno bo Organ presodil, ali je priglašeno triletno prehodno obdobje za coni 3 in 4 objektivno potrebno in upravičeno, da se zadevnim podjetjem omogoči ustrezen prehod na nove razmere [20].3.2 Ali je triletno prehodno obdobje za coni 3 in 4 potrebno in upravičeno?
No 15/04/COL
št. 15/04/COL
amending for the forty-first time the Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid by introducing a new chapter 9C: Professional secrecy in State aid decisions
o enainštirideseti spremembi procesnih in materialnih pravil na področju državne pomoči z uvedbo novega poglavja 9C: poklicna skrivnost v odločbah o državni pomoči
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [1], in particular to Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26 thereof,
Ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [1], in zlasti členov 61 do 63 ter Protokola 26 k Sporazumu.
Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice [2], in particular to Article 24, Article 5(2)(b) and Article 1 in Part I of Protocol 3 thereof [3], Whereas under Article 24 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall give effect to the provisions of the EEA Agreement concerning State aid,
Ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med državami EFTA o ustanovitvi Nadzornega organa in Sodišča [2] ter zlasti člena 24, člena 5(2)(b) in člena 1 dela I Protokola 3 k Sporazumu [3].Ker v skladu s členom 24 Sporazuma o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču Nadzorni organ EFTA uveljavlja določbe Sporazuma EGP v zvezi z državno pomočjo.
Whereas under Article 5(2)(b) of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall issue notices or guidelines on matters dealt with in the EEA Agreement, if that Agreement or the Surveillance and Court Agreement expressly so provides or if the EFTA Surveillance Authority considers it necessary,
Ker v skladu s členom 5(2)(b) Sporazuma o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču Nadzorni organ EFTA objavlja obvestila ali smernice o zadevah, ki jih obravnava Sporazum EGP, če to izrecno določata navedeni sporazum ali Sporazum o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču ali če Nadzorni organ EFTA meni, da je to potrebno.
Recalling the Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid [4] adopted on 19 January 1994 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority,
Ob sklicevanju na procesna in materialna pravila na področju državne pomoči [4], ki jih je 19. januarja 1994 sprejel Nadzorni organ EFTA.
Whereas the European Commission issued a new communication C(2003) 4582 on professional secrecy in State aid decisions on 1 December 2003 [5],Whereas this communication is also of relevance for the European Economic Area,
Ker je Evropska komisija 1. decembra 2003 izdala novo sporočilo C(2003) 4582 o poklicni skrivnosti v odločbah o državni pomoči [5].Ker je to sporočilo pomembno tudi za Evropski gospodarski prostor.
Whereas a uniform application of the EEA State aid rules is to be ensured throughout the European Economic Area,
Ker je treba zagotoviti enotno uporabo pravil o državni pomoči za države EFTA v celotnem Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru.
Whereas, according to point II under the heading ‘GENERAL’ at the end of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority is to adopt, after consultation with the Commission, acts corresponding to those adopted by the European Commission,
Ker naj bi v skladu s točko II pod naslovom „SPLOŠNO“ na koncu Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP Nadzorni organ EFTA po posvetovanju s Komisijo sprejel akte, ki ustrezajo tistim, ki jih je sprejela Evropska komisija.
Having consulted the European Commission,
Po posvetovanju z Evropsko komisijo.
Recalling that the EFTA Surveillance Authority has consulted the EFTA States in a multilateral meeting on 3 February 2004 on the subject,
Ob sklicevanju na to, da se je Nadzorni organ EFTA o tej temi posvetoval z državami EFTA na večstranskem sestanku dne 3. februarja 2004 –
The State Aid Guidelines shall be amended by adding a new Chapter 9C with the title ‘Professional secrecy in State aid decisions’.
Smernice o državni pomoči se spremenijo tako, da se doda novo poglavje 9C z naslovom „Poklicna skrivnost v odločbah o državni pomoči“.
The new Chapter 9C to the State Aid Guidelines can be found in the Annex to this Decision.
Novo poglavje 9C Smernic o državni pomoči je objavljeno v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
The EFTA States shall be informed by means of a letter, including a copy of this Decision and including the Annex.
Države EFTA se obvestijo s pismom, ki vsebuje izvod te odločbe in Prilogo.
The European Commission shall be informed, in accordance with point (d) of Protocol 27 of the EEA Agreement, by means of a copy of this Decision, including the Annex.
4. Evropska komisija se obvesti z izvodom te odločbe skupaj s Prilogo v skladu s točko (d) Protokola 27 k Sporazumu EGP.
The Decision, including the Annex, shall be published in the EEA Section of and in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta odločba se skupaj s Prilogo objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, in sicer v Oddelku EGP in Dodatku EGP.
Hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement.
V nadaljevanju Sporazum EGP.
Hereinafter referred to as the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
V nadaljevanju Sporazum o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču.
It has to be noted that the amendments to Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, following an agreement between EFTA States of 10.12.2001, amending Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, entered into force on 28.8.2003.
Opozoriti velja, da so po sporazumu med državami EFTA z dne 10.12.2001 o spremembah Protokola 3 k Sporazumu med državami EFTA o ustanovitvi Nadzornega organa in Sodišča 28.8.2003 začele veljati spremembe Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču.
These amendments incorporated ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22.3.1999, laying down detailed rules for the application of [ex] Article 93 of the EC Treaty’ into Protocol 3.
Te spremembe so v Protokol 3 vključile Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22.3.1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo [prej] člena 93 Pogodbe ES.
Guidelines on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, adopted and issued by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 19.1.1994, OJ No L 231 of 3.9.1994, EEA Supplement No 32, last amended by the Authority's Decision No 198/03/COL of 5.11.2003, not yet published.
Smernice o uporabi in razlagi členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma EGP ter člena 1 Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču, ki jih je sprejel in izdal Nadzorni organ EFTA dne 19.1.1994, UL L 231, 3.9.1994, Dodatek EGP št. 32, kakor so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Odločbo Nadzornega organa št. 198/03/COL z dne 5.11.2003, še neobjavljene.
Commission communication C(2003) 4582 of 1 December 2003 on professional secrecy in State aid decisions, published in OJ No C 297 of 9 December 2003, page 6.
Sporočilo Komisije C(2003) 4582 z dne 1. decembra 2003 o poklicni skrivnosti v odločbah o državni pomoči, objavljeno v UL C 297 z dne 9.12.2003, str. 6.
PROFESSIONAL SECRECY IN STATE AID DECISIONS
POKLICNA SKRIVNOST V ODLOČBAH O DRŽAVNI POMOČI
This Communication sets out how the EFTA Surveillance Authority intends to deal with requests by EFTA States, as addressees of State Aid decisions, to consider parts of such decisions as covered by the obligation of professional secrecy and thus not to be disclosed when the decision is published.
To sporočilo določa, kako namerava Nadzorni organ EFTA obravnavati zahtevke držav EFTA, naslovnic odločb o dodeljevanju državne pomoči, za uveljavitev obveznosti varovanja poklicne skrivnosti pri delih takih odločb, ki naj se tako ob objavi odločbe ne bi smeli razkriti.
This involves two aspects, namely:
To vključuje dva vidika, in sicer:
the identification of the information which might be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy; and
opredelitev informacij, za katere utegne veljati obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti; ter
the procedure to be followed for dealing with such requests.
postopek za obravnavanje takih zahtevkov.
Article 122 of the EEA Agreement, which corresponds in the wording to Article 287 of the EC Treaty, states that: ‘The representatives, delegates and experts of the Contracting Parties, as well as officials and other servants acting under this Agreement shall be required, even after their duties have ceased, not to disclose information of the kind covered by the obligation on professional secrecy, in particular information about undertakings, their business relations or their cost components’.
Člen 122 Sporazuma EGP, ki po besedilu ustreza členu 287 Pogodbe ES, navaja: „Predstavniki, poslanci in strokovnjaki pogodbenic ter uradniki in drugi uslužbenci, ki delujejo po tem sporazumu, tudi po prenehanju opravljanja svojih nalog ne smejo razkrivati informacij, za katere velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti, zlasti informacij o podjetjih, njihovih poslovnih odnosih ali sestavinah stroškov.“
This is also reflected in Articles 24 and 25 of Part II to Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement on the Functions and Powers of the EFTA Surveillance Authority in the field of State Aid [1].
To upoštevata tudi člena 24 in 25 dela II k Protokolu 3 k Sporazumu o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču o nalogah in pooblastilih Nadzornega organa EFTA na področju državnih pomoči [1].
Article 16 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement states: ‘Decisions of the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall state the reasons on which they are based’.
Člen 16 Sporazuma o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču pravi: „V odločbah Nadzornega organa EFTA se navedejo razlogi, na katerih temeljijo.“
Article 6(1), first sentence of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement further stipulates with regard to decisions to initiate the formal investigation procedures: ‘The decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure shall summarise the relevant issues of fact and law, shall include a preliminary assessment of the EFTA Surveillance Authority as to the aid character of the proposed measure and shall set out the doubts as to its compatibility with the common market […]’.
Prvi stavek člena 6(1) v Protokolu 3 k Sporazumu o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču v zvezi z odločbami o začetku formalnih postopkov preiskave nadalje določa: „Odločba o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave vsebuje povzetek bistvenih dejanskih in pravnih vprašanj, vključuje predhodno oceno Nadzornega organa EFTA o značaju pomoči predlaganega ukrepa in izpostavi dvome o njegovi združljivosti s skupnim trgom […].“
Identification of information which can be covered by professional secrecy
Opredelitev informacij, ki so lahko zavezane poklicni skrivnosti
The EC Court of Justice has established that although Article 287 of the EC Treaty primarily refers to information gathered from undertakings, the expression ‘in particular’ shows that the principle in question is a general one which applies also to other confidential information [2].
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je ugotovilo, da čeprav se člen 287 Pogodbe ES nanaša predvsem na informacije, pridobljene od podjetij, izraz „zlasti“ kaže, da je zadevno načelo splošno in velja tudi za druge zaupne informacije [2].
It follows that professional secrecy covers both business secrets and other confidential information.
Iz tega sledi, da poklicna skrivnost zajema poslovne skrivnosti in druge zaupne informacije.
There is no reason why the notions of business secret and other confidential information should be interpreted differently from the meaning given to these terms in the context of antitrust and merger procedures.
Nobenega razloga ni, zakaj bi se pojma poslovne skrivnosti in drugih zaupnih informacij obravnavala drugače od pomena, ki ga imata v okviru protimonopolnih postopkov in postopkov združevanja podjetij.
The fact that in antitrust and merger procedures the addressees of the Authority decision are undertakings, while in State Aid procedures the addressees are EFTA States, does not constitute an obstacle to a uniform approach as to the identification of what can constitute business secrets or other confidential information.
Dejstvo, da so v protimonopolnih postopkih in postopkih združevanja podjetij naslovniki odločbe Nadzornega organa podjetja, medtem ko so v postopkih dodeljevanja državnih pomoči naslovnice države EFTA, ni ovira za enoten pristop pri določanju, kaj so lahko poslovne skrivnosti ali druge zaupne informacije.
Business secrets
Poslovne skrivnosti
Business secrets can only concern information relating to a business which has actual or potential economic value, the disclosure or use of which could result in economic benefits for other companies.
Poslovne skrivnosti so lahko samo informacije v zvezi s poslovanjem, ki imajo dejansko ali potencialno tržno vrednost, njihovo razkritje ali uporaba pa bi prinesla tržne koristi drugim podjetjem.
Typical examples are methods of assessing manufacturing and distribution costs, production secrets (that is to say, a secret, commercially valuable plan, formula, process or device that is used for the making, preparing, compounding, or processing of trade commodities and that can be said to be the end product of either innovation or substantial effort) and processes, supply sources, quantities produced and sold, market shares, customer and distributor lists, marketing plans, cost price structure, sales policy, and information on the internal organisation of the undertaking.
Značilni primeri so metode obračunavanja proizvajalnih stroškov in stroškov distribucije, proizvodne skrivnosti (tj. zaupen načrt, formula, postopek ali naprava s tržno vrednostjo, ki se uporablja za izdelavo, pripravo, sestavljanje ali predelavo tržnega blaga in ki izhaja iz inovacije ali znatnih prizadevanj) ter postopki, dobavni viri, proizvedene in prodane količine, tržni deleži, seznami strank in distributerjev, trženjski načrti, ustroj lastne cene, prodajna politika in informacije o notranji organizaciji podjetja.
It would appear that in principle business secrets can only relate to the beneficiary of the aid (or other third party) and can only concern information submitted by the EFTA State (or third party).
Zdi se, da se poslovne skrivnosti načeloma lahko nanašajo samo na upravičenca do pomoči (ali drugo tretjo stranko) in lahko zajemajo samo informacije, ki jih prispeva država članica EFTA (ali tretja stranka).
Hence, statements from the Authority itself (for example, expressing doubts about feasibility of a restructuring plan) cannot be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
Iz tega izhaja, da za izjave Nadzornega organa (na primer o dvomih glede izvedljivosti načrta prestrukturiranja) ne more veljati obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti.
The simple fact that disclosure of information might cause harm to the company is not of itself sufficient grounds to consider that such information should be considered as business secret.
Preprosto dejstvo, da lahko razkritje informacij podjetju škodi, samo po sebi ni zadosten razlog za mnenje, da bi morale take informacije veljati za poslovno skrivnost.
For example, a decision of the Authority to initiate the formal investigation procedure in the case of a restructuring aid may cast doubt on certain aspects of the restructuring plan in the light of information the Authority has received.
Odločba Nadzornega organa o začetku formalnega postopka za preiskavo v primeru podpore za prestrukturiranje lahko na primer vzbudi dvom o nekaterih vidikih načrta prestrukturiranja na podlagi informacij, ki jih je prejel Nadzorni organ.
Such a decision could (further) affect the credit-position of that company.
Taka odločba bi lahko (dodatno) vplivala na boniteto zadevnega podjetja.
However, that would not necessarily lead to the conclusion that the information on which that decision was based must be considered as business secrets.
Vendar iz tega ne bi nujno izhajalo, da morajo informacije, na katerih temelji taka odločba, veljati za poslovne skrivnosti.
In general, the Authority will apply the following non-exhaustive list of criteria to determine whether information can be deemed to constitute business secrets:
Na splošno bo Nadzorni organ pri odločanju, ali se informacije lahko uvrstijo med poslovne skrivnosti, uporabljal naslednji seznam meril, ki pa ni dokončen:
the extent to which the information is known outside the company;
koliko so informacije znane zunaj podjetja;
the extent to which measures have been taken to protect the information within the company, for example, through non-compete clauses or non-disclosure agreements imposed on employees or agents, etc;
vrsta ukrepov, ki so bili sprejeti za zaščito informacij znotraj podjetja, na primer konkurenčne klavzule ali pogodbe o nerazkritju za zaposlene ali zastopnike itn;
the value of the information for the company and its competitors;
vrednost informacij za podjetje in njegove tekmece;