natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes that the Joint Undertaking adopted specific rules preventing potential conflicts of interest of the members of its Governing Board, Executive Committee, Audit Committee and experts; points out that rules regarding staff members as well as a database for the general declarations of interest have not been set up until the time of the audit; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the Rules on the management of the conflict of interests regarding staff members have been adopted by the Governing Board and entered into force on 1 July 2014; notes furthermore that a dedicated database for general declarations started to be elaborated;
ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje sprejelo posebna pravila, ki preprečujejo potencialna navzkrižja interesov članov upravnega odbora, izvršnega odbora, revizijskega odbora in strokovnjakov; poudarja, da do časa revizije še niso bili sprejeti predpisi o zaposlenih niti oblikovana baza podatkov za splošne izjave o interesih; potrjuje, da je po podatkih skupnega podjetja upravni odbor sprejel predpise o upravljanju navzkrižja interesov za zaposlene, ki so začeli veljati 1. julija 2014; poleg tega ugotavlja, da se je začela pripravljati posebna baza podatkov za splošne izjave;
Operational procurement contracts and grants
Pogodbe o izvedbi operativnih javnih naročil in nepovratna sredstva
Notes that out of the 41 operational tendering procedures launched in 2013, negotiated procedures constituted 44 %; points out that this percentage is higher by 4 % in comparison to the number registered in 2012; agrees with the Court's recommendation that an increase of the competitiveness of procurement procedures is needed by reducing the use of negotiated procedures; takes note that the average number of proposals for grants was only one per call; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that due to the low average value, the negotiated procedures referred to by the Court only correspond to 15 % of the Joint Undertaking's yearly commitment;
ugotavlja, da so postopki s pogajanji predstavljali 44 % od 41 operativnih postopkov oddaje javnih naročil, začetih leta 2013; poudarja, da je to za 4 % več, kot je bilo zabeleženo leta 2012; se strinja s priporočilom Računskega sodišča, da je treba povečati konkurenčnost postopkov javnega naročanja z zmanjšanjem uporabe postopkov s pogajanji; opaža, da je bil pri razpisih za nepovratna sredstva v povprečju sprejet le en predlog na razpis; je seznanjen z informacijami skupnega podjetja, da zaradi nizkega povprečja postopki s pogajanji, ki jih omenja Računsko sodišče, predstavljajo samo 15 % letne obveznosti;
Notes with concern the on-going weaknesses related to the Joint Undertaking's operational procurement procedures; calls on the Joint Undertaking to submit to the discharge authority a detailed report regarding the procurement procedures that took place from 2008 until present, outlining the following:
z zaskrbljenostjo opaža redne nedoslednosti pri operativnih postopkih javnega naročanja, ki ga vodi skupno podjetje; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice predloži podrobno poročilo o postopkih javnega naročanja, ki so potekali od leta 2008, in v njem navede naslednje:
In how many procedures has a significant cost increase (more than 5 %) taken place with respect to the initial set cost frame of contract and what were the exact reasons for the increases,
V koliko postopkih je prišlo do znatnega povečanja stroškov (za več kot 5 %) glede na začetni stroškovni okvir pogodbe in kakšni so bili natančni razlogi za povečanje?
Which procedures suffered from a considerable time delay compared to their initial target date and what have been the financial consequences deriving from such delays,
Pri katerih postopkih je prišlo do znatnih zamud glede na začetni rok in katere so bile finančne posledice teh zamud?
How does the Joint Undertaking ensure for the future that the set dates of contract signature are being met,
Kako bo skupno podjetje v prihodnje zagotovilo spoštovanje rokov, določenih ob podpisu pogodb?
Which procurement procedures did not set a specific target date at all when awarding the contracts,
Pri katerih postopkih javnih naročil rok ob oddaji naročila sploh ni bil določen?
In which procedures did the Joint Undertaking not advertise the respective contract by means of a pre-information notice, thus failing to increase the competitiveness of the procedure and what were the reasons for this as well as which contractual partners did particularly benefit from the consequently limited competiveness,
Pri katerih postopkih skupno podjetje pogodbe ni objavilo v predhodnem informativnem obvestilu in je s tem omejilo konkurenčnost postopka ter kakšni so razlogi za to in kateri pogodbeni partnerji so zlasti imeli koristi od posledično omejene konkurenčnosti?
What procedures (besides the applicable Staff Regulations) are in place to prevent a possible conflict of interest in relation to members of staff involved in tendering procedures and in how many cases were members of staff not formally mandated to be involved in tendering procedures,
Kateri postopki (poleg veljavnih kadrovskih predpisov) so bili sprejeti za preprečevanje morebitnega navzkrižja interesov v zvezi z udeležbo članov osebja v razpisnih postopkih in v koliko primerih člani osebja niso imeli uradnega pooblastila za sodelovanje pri razpisnih postopkih?
How does the Joint Undertaking ensure that its internal decision making procedure is improved to avoid further time delays in tender procedures, as determined by the Court, in order to guarantee transparent, timely and lawful tenders for the future,
Kako skupno podjetje zagotavlja, da se bo izboljšal njegov notranji postopek sprejemanja odločitev in bodo onemogočene dodatne zamude pri razpisnih postopkih, kot je ugotovilo Računsko sodišče, razpisi v prihodnosti pa pregledni, pravočasni in zakoniti?
Notes with concern from the Court's report that the following weaknesses were identified after auditing five operational procurement procedures:
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča z zaskrbljenostjo opaža, da so bile po reviziji petih postopkov za pogodbe o izvedbi operativnih javnih naročil ugotovljene naslednje pomanjkljivosti:
the Joint Undertaking failed to advertise one contract by means of a pre-information notice in one procurement procedure; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the contract in discussion was launched before the procedure of pre-information notice was approved in September 2012;
pri enem postopku oddaje javnih naročil skupno podjetje ni objavilo predhodnega informativnega obvestila o pogodbi; je seznanjen z informacijo skupnega podjetja, da je bila ta pogodba objavljena še pred sprejetjem postopka predhodnega informativnega obvestila septembra 2012,
in one procurement procedure, an increase of 32 % was observed in comparison to the initial cost estimate; notes furthermore that in two other procurement procedures, due to the nature of the information available in the files, the reconciliation of the difference between the final contract value with the initial estimation value was proven as complicated; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the complexity of the reconciliation is due to the re-evaluation of the initial scope of the contract, which led to an increase of time as well as to the nature, complexity and amounts involved in such contracts;
pri enem postopku oddaje javnih naročil so se stroški v primerjavi s prvotno oceno povečali za 32 %; poleg tega ugotavlja, da je bilo pri dveh drugih postopkih usklajevanje razlik med končno vrednostjo pogodbe in prvotno ocenjeno vrednostjo zapleteno zaradi lastnosti informacij, ki so bile na voljo v mapah; je seznanjen z informacijami skupnega podjetja, da je bilo usklajevanje zapleteno zaradi ponovne ocene prvotnega obsega pogodbe, kar je privedlo do podaljšanja časa, spremembe narave in povečanja zapletenosti in zneskov, običajno povezanih s takimi pogodbami,
one procedure was found not to have specific guidelines and procedures to ensure that the deliverables, used as input documents for the tendering procedures from the third parties, were uniformly and systematically reviewed and formally accepted by the Joint Undertaking; takes note that the Joint Undertaking will prepare a formal checklist in order to ensure appropriate use of third-party information; calls on the Joint Undertaking to implement the checklist as soon as possible in order to avoid such situations in the future;
ugotovljeno je bilo, da pri enem postopku oddaje javnih naročil ni bilo posebnih smernic in postopkov, ki bi zagotovili, da bi bili rezultati tretjih strani, uporabljeni kot vhodni dokumenti za postopke oddaje javnih naročil, enotno in sistematično pregledani ter da bi jih skupno podjetje uradno sprejelo; je seznanjen, da bo skupno podjetje pripravilo uradni kontrolni seznam, ki bo zagotavljal ustrezno uporabo podatkov tretjih strani; poziva skupno podjetje, naj ta kontrolni seznam začne čim prej uporabljati, da bi se v prihodnosti izognili takim dogodkom,
amendments to the original contract of one of the procurement procedures increased the contract's value by 15 % compared to the initial amount; points out that the information available was not sufficient to conclude that the assessment of the materiality of the amendments was performed as required by the Joint Undertaking's internal procedures;
pri enem postopku oddaje javnih naročil se je s spremembami prvotnih pogodb povečala vrednost pogodbe za 15 % v primerjavi s prvotnim zneskom; poudarja, da razpoložljive informacije niso zadoščale za zaključek, da je bila opravljena ocena pomembnosti sprememb, kot določajo interni postopki skupnega podjetja,
one procedure's dialogue phase was long delayed, resulting in the final contract conditions and the updated technical version of the tender specifications being sent later than planned as well as in signing the contract four months after the target date;
pri enem postopku se je faza dialoga zelo zavlekla, zato so bili končni pogoji pogodbe in posodobljena tehnična različica razpisnih specifikacij poslani kasneje, kot je bilo načrtovano, pogodba pa je bila podpisana šele štiri mesece po načrtovanem datum;
Finds it unacceptable that the Joint Undertaking has not developed an internal procedure for the staff involved in tendering procedures; points out that improvement in this area is urgently needed;
meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da skupno podjetje ni razvilo notranjega postopka za uslužbence, ki se ukvarjajo s postopki oddaje javnih naročil; poudarja, da so na tem področju nujno potrebne izboljšave;
Notes from the Court's report that in two procurement procedures the Joint Undertaking staff members providing technical advice during the evaluation of the offers, upon request of the evaluation committee, had not been formally nominated by the Appointing Authority, either as members of the evaluation committee or as experts providing technical advice to the committee; points out that in one tendering procedure following the call for expression of interest, the Authorising Officer appointed a team to conduct a dialogue with the candidates selected whilst there was no formal mandate for this team to set out the dialogue strategy, the objectives to be achieved and the technical, financial and contractual parameters for the negotiations;
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da pri dveh postopkih oddaje javnih naročil organ za imenovanja zato ni formalno imenoval uslužbencev skupnega podjetja, ki so na zahtevo odbora za vrednotenje zagotavljali tehnično svetovanje pri vrednotenju ponudb, niti kot člane odbora za vrednotenje niti kot strokovnjake, ki odboru zagotavljajo tehnično svetovanje; poudarja, da je pri enem postopku oddaje javnih naročil odredbodajalec imenoval skupino za dialog s kandidati, izbranimi po razpisu za prijavo interesa, čeprav ta skupina ni imela uradnih pooblastil za določitev strategije dialoga, ciljev, ki bi jih bilo treba doseči, ter tehničnih, finančnih in pogodbenih parametrov za pogajanja;
Overall control and monitoring of operational procurement contracts and grants
Splošna kontrola in spremljanje pogodb o operativnih javnih naročilih in nepovratnih sredstvih
Acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking has a system for performing audits at the level of contractors with the aim of checking compliance with the quality assurance requirements; notes that the result of ex-post audits on grants and financial compliance verifications on contract implementation arising from the implementation of the overall monitoring and control strategy were not available at the time of the Court's audit in April 2014;
potrjuje, da ima skupno podjetje po svojih navedbah sistem za izvajanje revizij na ravni izvajalcev, katerih namen je preverjanje izpolnjevanja zahtev v zvezi z zagotavljanjem kakovosti; ugotavlja, da v času revizije Računskega sodišča aprila 2014 niso bili na voljo rezultati naknadnih revizij nepovratnih sredstev ter finančnih preverjanj in preverjanj skladnosti pri izvajanju pogodb, ki nastanejo pri izvajanju splošne strategije spremljanja in kontrol;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking has not amended its financial rules in order to reflect the changes brought by the new Financial Regulation and the framework financial regulation for the bodies [2] referred to in Article 208 of the new Financial Regulation; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that it assessed the changes and proposed the amendments to its Governing Board; notes that in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2007/198/Euratom, the Commission is to issue an opinion prior to submission of the final version of the financial rules to the Joint Undertaking's Governing Board; calls on the Commission and the Joint Undertaking to remedy this issue without delay;
ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje ni spremenilo svojih finančnih predpisov, kar bi bilo potrebno zaradi sprememb, uvedenih z novo finančno uredbo in okvirno finančno uredbo za organe [2] v členu 208 nove finančne uredbe; je seznanjen z informacijami skupnega podjetja, da je ocenilo spremembe in upravnemu odboru predlagalo spremembe; je seznanjen, da mora Komisija v skladu s členom 5 Sklepa 2007/198/Euratom upravnemu odboru skupnega podjetja izdati mnenje pred predložitvijo končne verzije finančnih pravil; poziva Komisijo in skupno podjetje, naj takoj rešita to vprašanje;
Notes the Joint Statement by the Parliament, the Council and the Commission [3] and the subsequent political agreement reached on the separate discharge for Joint Undertakings;
je seznanjen s skupno izjavo Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije [3] ter posledičnim političnim dogovorom o posebni razrešnici za skupna podjetja;
Intellectual property rights and industrial policy
Pravice intelektualne lastnine in industrijska politika
Takes note that the Decision on the implementation of the Fusion for Energy Industrial Policy and the Policy on Intellectual Property Rights and dissemination of information were adopted by the Joint Undertaking's Governing Board on 27 June 2013; notes that the Joint Undertaking has not yet adopted and implemented certain measures aimed at mitigating specific risks related to the protection of the intellectual property rights and the dissemination of research results; acknowledges the Joint Undertaking's opinion that the costs of implementation of such measures do not appear proportionate to the size of the residual risk and would be difficult to implement in practice;
je seznanjen, da je upravni odbor skupnega podjetja 27. junija 2013 sprejel sklep o izvajanju industrijske politike fuzije za energijo in politike o pravicah intelektualne lastnine in širjenju informacij; ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje še ni sprejelo in začelo izvajati posebnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje posebnih tveganj, povezanih z varstvom pravic intelektualne lastnine in razširjanjem rezultatov raziskav; je seznanjen z mnenjem skupnega podjetja, da se stroški izvajanja teh ukrepov ne zdijo sorazmerni z obsegom preostalega tveganja in da bi jih bilo težko izvesti v praksi;
Notes from the Court's report that the Joint Undertaking's contractors are offered exclusive exploitation rights over intellectual property produced in fields outside fusion, while in the field of fusion the contractors have non-exclusive rights; notes the potential exposure of the Joint Undertaking to the risk regarding its obligations to retain the right to access the full intellectual property rights involved in the European in-kind contributions and in being able to transfer the access right to the ITER Organisation, if needed; agrees with the Court's recommendation that monitoring the application of the clause of the contracts is needed, in order to oblige the contractors to refrain from carrying out any dissemination of research results until a decision about their possible protection is made; calls on the Joint Undertaking to define boundaries of what would be considered as fusion application in order to ensure maximum clarity and transparency in relation to contractors.
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da imajo pogodbeniki skupnega podjetja izključne pravice za izkoriščanje intelektualne lastnine, ki jo ustvarijo na nefuzijskih področjih, in neizključne pravice na področju fuzije; je seznanjen, da bi skupno podjetje lahko bilo izpostavljeno tveganju v zvezi s svojo obveznostjo, da ohrani pravice do dostopa do polnih pravic intelektualne lastnine za evropske stvarne prispevke, in v zvezi s pravico, da dostop po potrebi prenese na Organizacijo ITER; se strinja s priporočilom Računskega sodišča, da bi skupno podjetje moralo nadzorovati uporabo klavzule v pogodbah, v skladu s katero pogodbeniki ne smejo razširjati rezultatov raziskav, dokler ni sprejeta odločitev o njihovi morebitni zaščiti; poziva skupno podjetje, naj določi meje tega, kar velja za fuzijsko uporabo, da bi v zvezi s pogodbeniki zagotovilo največjo možno jasnost in preglednost.
Council conclusions on ITER status of 7 July 2010 (ref.11902/10).
Sklepi Sveta o stanju projekta ITER z dne 7. julija 2010 (sklic 11902/10).
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja SESAR za proračunsko leto 2013
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja SESAR za proračunsko leto 2013,
A. whereas the SESAR Joint Undertaking (‘the Joint Undertaking’) was set up in February 2007 to run the Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research (SESAR) programme that aims to modernise air traffic management in Europe,
A. ker je bilo Skupno podjetje SESAR (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno februarja 2007 za izvajanje programa Enotno evropsko nebo – raziskave upravljanja zračnega prometa (SESAR), katerega cilj je posodobiti upravljanje zračnega prometa v Evropi;
B. whereas the SESAR project is divided into a ‘definition phase’ (2004-2007) led by Eurocontrol, a first ‘development phase’ (2008-2016), funded by the 2008-2013 programming period managed by the Joint Undertaking and a ‘deployment phase’ (2014-2020) running in parallel to the ‘development phase’; whereas the deployment phase is expected to be led by industry and stakeholders for the large-scale production and implementation of the new air traffic management infrastructure,
B. ker je projekt SESAR razdeljen v „fazo opredelitve“ (2004–2007), ki jo vodi Eurocontrol, prvo „razvojno fazo“ (2008–2016), ki se financira v programskem obdobju 2008–2013 in jo upravlja skupno podjetje, ter „uvajalno fazo“ (2014–2020), ki poteka vzporedno z „razvojno fazo“; ker naj bi uvajalno fazo vodili industrija in deležniki, namenjena pa bo obsežni izdelavi in uvajanju nove infrastrukture upravljanja zračnega prometa;
C. whereas the Joint Undertaking started to work autonomously in 2007,
C. ker je skupno podjetje začelo samostojno delovati leta 2007;
E. whereas the budget for the 2008-2016 development phase of the SESAR project is EUR 2100000000 and is to be provided in equal parts by the Union, Eurocontrol and the participating public and private partners,
E. ker proračun za razvojno fazo projekta SESAR za obdobje 2008–2016 znaša 2100000000 EUR, ki jih bodo v enakih deležih zagotovili Unija, Eurocontrol ter sodelujoči javni in zasebni partnerji;
Highlights the Joint Undertaking's vital role in coordinating and implementing research into the SESAR project, which is a pillar project of the Single European Sky; notes also that 2014 marks the beginning of the deployment phase of the SESAR project;
opozarja na bistveno vlogo skupnega podjetja pri usklajevanju in izvajanju raziskav projekta SESAR, stebra enotnega evropskega neba; ugotavlja tudi, da se je leta 2014 začela uvajalna faza tega projekta;
Notes that the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’) stated that the 2013 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2013 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Rules;
ugotavlja, da po mnenju Računskega sodišča zaključni račun skupnega podjetja za leto 2013 v vseh pomembnih vidikih ustrezno prikazuje njegovo finančno stanje na dan 31. decembra 2013 ter rezultate njegovega poslovanja in denarne tokove za leto, ki se je takrat končalo, v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking's final budget for the financial year 2013 included commitment appropriations of EUR 64300000 and payment appropriations of EUR 105400000; notes furthermore that the utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 99,6 % and 94,7 % respectively;
ugotavlja, da je končni proračun skupnega podjetja za proračunsko leto 2013 vključeval odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v višini 64300000 EUR in odobritve plačil v višini 105400000 EUR; poleg tega ugotavlja, da sta bili stopnji uporabe odobritev za prevzem obveznosti in odobritev plačil 99,6 % oziroma 94,7 %;
Takes note that as of 31 December 2013, the Joint Undertaking's development phase consisted of project work done by 16 members including Eurocontrol, on programme activities involving more than 100 private and public entities and subcontractors resulting in 333 out of 358 programme projects to be implemented or completed under the third Multilateral Framework Agreement (MFA);
ugotavlja, da je 31. decembra 2013 razvojna faza skupnega podjetja zajemala projektno delo 16 članov (vključno z organizacijo Eurocontrol) na dejavnostih programa, ki so vključevale več kot 100 zasebnih in javnih subjektov ter podizvajalcev, pri čemer naj bi se 333 od 358 projektov programa izvajalo oziroma dokončalo v okviru tretjega večstranskega okvirnega sporazuma;
Points out that 100 % of the Union and Eurocontrol contributions payable to the other 15 members under the third MFA of EUR 595000000 has been committed; notes furthermore that 55 % of that amount, equalling EUR 316000000, has been paid out until 31 December 2013 while the remaining 45 % (EUR 279000000) is expected to be paid by 31 December 2016;
poudarja, da so bile za 100 % prispevkov, ki jih preostalim 15 članom plačujeta Unija in Eurocontrol v okviru tretjega večstranskega okvirnega sporazuma in znašajo 595000000 EUR, prevzete obveznosti; poleg tega ugotavlja, da je bilo 55 % zneska (316000000 EUR) izplačanega do 31. decembra 2013, pričakuje pa se, da bo preostalih 45 % (279000000 EUR) plačanih do 31. decembra 2016;