natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The hearing officer may be asked by undertakings or associations of undertakings to examine claims that a document required by the Authority in the exercise of powers conferred on it pursuant to Article 18, 20 or 21 of Chapter II of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, in inspections pursuant to Article 13 of Chapter IV of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement or in the context of investigatory measures in proceedings that can result in the imposition of fines pursuant to Article 14 of Chapter IV of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement and which was withheld from the Authority is covered by legal professional privilege, within the meaning of the case-law of the Court of Justice and the EFTA Court.
Podjetja ali podjetniška združenja lahko pooblaščenca za zaslišanje prosijo, da prouči zahtevke, da za dokument, ki ga zahteva Nadzorni organ v okviru izvrševanja pooblastil iz členov 18, 20 ali 21 poglavja II Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, med preiskavami v skladu s členom 13 poglavja IV Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču ali v okviru preiskovalnih ukrepov v postopkih, v katerih je lahko naložena globa na podlagi člena 14 poglavja IV Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, in ki je bil Nadzornemu organu zamolčan, velja varovanje poklicne zaupnosti sporazumevanja med odvetnikom in stranko v smislu sodne prakse Sodišča EU in Sodišča Efte.
The hearing officer may only review the matter if the undertaking or association of undertakings making the claim consent to the hearing officer viewing the information claimed to be covered by legal professional privilege as well as related documents that the hearing officer considers necessary for his or her review.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje lahko prouči zadevo le, če se podjetje ali podjetniško združenje, ki je vložilo zahtevek, strinja, da pooblaščenec za zaslišanje pregleda informacije, za katere se trdi, da zanje velja varovanje poklicne zaupnosti sporazumevanja med odvetnikom in stranko, in s tem povezane dokumente, ki so po mnenju pooblaščenca za zaslišanje nujni za proučitev.
Without revealing the potentially privileged content of the information, the hearing officer shall communicate to the director of the Competition and State Aid Directorate and the undertaking or association of undertakings concerned his or her preliminary view, and may take appropriate steps to promote a mutually acceptable resolution.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje direktorju Direktorata za konkurenco in državno pomoč in zadevnemu podjetju ali podjetniškemu združenju sporoči svoje predhodno mnenje, ne da bi razkril morebitno varovano vsebino informacij, ter lahko sprejme ustrezne ukrepe za spodbuditev obojestransko sprejemljive rešitve.
Where no resolution is reached, the hearing officer may formulate a reasoned recommendation to the competent College Member, without revealing the potentially privileged content of the document.
Če se rešitev ne doseže, lahko pooblaščenec za zaslišanje pristojnemu članu kolegija pošlje obrazloženo priporočilo, ne da bi razkril morebitno varovano vsebino dokumenta.
The party making the claim shall receive a copy of this recommendation.
Stranka, ki je vložila zahtevek, prejme kopijo tega priporočila.
Where the addressee of a request for information pursuant to Article 18(2) of Chapter II of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement refuses to reply to a question in such a request invoking the privilege against self-incrimination, as determined by the case-law of the Court of Justice and the EFTA Court, it may refer the matter, in due time following the receipt of the request, to the hearing officer.
Kadar naslovnik zahteve po informacijah na podlagi člena 18(2) poglavja II Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču noče odgovoriti na vprašanje v taki zahtevi in se sklicuje na privilegij zoper samoobtožbo, kakor je opredeljen v sodni praksi Sodišča EU in Sodišča Efte, lahko zadevo pravočasno po prejetju zahteve predloži pooblaščencu za zaslišanje.
In appropriate cases, and having regard to the need to avoid undue delay in proceedings, the hearing officer may make a reasoned recommendation as to whether the privilege against self-incrimination applies and inform the director of the Competition and State Aid Directorate of the conclusions drawn, to be taken into account in case of any decision taken subsequently pursuant to Article 18(3) of Chapter II of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
V ustreznih zadevah in ob upoštevanju potrebe po izogibanju neutemeljenim zamudam v postopkih lahko pooblaščenec za zaslišanje oblikuje obrazloženo priporočilo glede veljavnosti privilegija zoper samoobtožbo in direktorja Direktorata za konkurenco in državno pomoč obvesti o sprejetih ugotovitvah, da se jih lahko upošteva pri pozneje sprejetih sklepih na podlagi člena 18(3) poglavja II Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
Where the addressee of a decision requesting information pursuant to Article 18(3) of Chapter II of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement considers that the time limit imposed for its reply is too short, it may refer the matter to the hearing officer, in due time before the expiry of the original time limit set.
Kadar naslovnik sklepa, s katerim se zahtevajo informacije na podlagi člena 18(3) poglavja II Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, meni, da je rok, določen za odgovor, prekratek, lahko zadevo pravočasno, pred potekom prvotno določenega roka, predloži pooblaščencu za zaslišanje.
Undertakings or associations of undertakings subject to an investigative measure by the Authority under Section V of Chapter II of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement shall have the right to be informed of their procedural status, namely whether they are subject to an investigation and, if so, the subject matter and purpose of that investigation.
Podjetja ali podjetniška združenja, ki so predmet preiskovalnega ukrepa nadzornega organa v okviru oddelka V poglavja II Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, imajo pravico do obveščenosti o svojem procesnem statusu, tj. o tem, ali so predmet preiskave, in če so, o vsebini in namenu preiskave.
If such an undertaking or association of undertakings considers that it has not been properly informed by the Directorate for Competition and State Aid of its procedural status, it may refer the matter to the hearing officer for resolution.
Če tako podjetje ali podjetniško združenje meni, da ga Direktorat za konkurenco in državno pomoč ni primerno obveščal o njegovem procesnem statusu, lahko predloži zadevo v razrešitev pooblaščencu za zaslišanje.
The hearing officer shall take a decision that the Directorate for Competition and State Aid will inform the undertaking or association of undertakings that made the request of their procedural status.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje sprejme odločitev, da bo Direktorat za konkurenco in državno pomoč obvestil podjetje ali podjetniško združenje, ki je vložilo zahtevo glede svojega procesnega statusa.
This decision shall be communicated to the undertaking or association of undertakings that made the request.
Ta odločitev je sporočena podjetju ali združenju podjetij, ki je vložilo zahtevo.
APPLICATIONS TO BE HEARD
VLOGE ZA ZASLIŠANJE
Applications to be heard from persons other than those referred to in Articles 5 and 11 of Chapter III of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement and third persons within the meaning of Article 11 of Chapter V of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement shall be made in accordance with Article 13(1) of Chapter III of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement and Article 16 of Chapter V of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Vloge za zaslišanje oseb, ki niso zajete v členih 5 in 11 poglavja III Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču ter tretjih oseb v smislu člena 11 poglavja V Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču se vložijo v skladu s členom 13(1) poglavja III Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču in člena 16 poglavja V Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
Applications shall be submitted in writing and explain the applicant’s interest in the outcome of the procedure.
Vloge se predložijo v pisni obliki in v njih je pojasnjen interes vlagatelja za izid postopka.
The hearing officer shall decide as to whether third persons are to be heard after consulting the director of the Competition and State Aid Directorate.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje po posvetovanju z direktorjem Direktorata za konkurenco in državno pomoč odloči o tem, ali naj se tretje osebe zaslišijo.
In assessing whether a third person shows a sufficient interest, the hearing officer shall take into account whether and to what extent the applicant is sufficiently affected by the conduct which is the subject of the competition proceedings or whether the applicant fulfils the requirements of Article 18(4) of Chapter IV of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje pri oceni, ali tretja oseba izkazuje zadosten interes, upošteva, ali ravnanje, ki je predmet postopkov o konkurenci, zadostno vpliva na vlagatelja in v kolikšni meri vpliva nanj ter ali vlagatelj izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 18(4) poglavja IV Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
The hearing officer shall inform parties to competition proceedings as from the initiation of proceedings pursuant to Article 11(6) of Chapter II of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement or Article 6(1)(c) of Chapter IV of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement of the identities of interested third persons to be heard, unless such disclosure would significantly harm a person or undertaking.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje stranke v postopkih o konkurenci obvešča od začetka postopkov na podlagi člena 11(6) poglavja II Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču ali na podlagi člena 6(1)(c) poglavja IV Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču o identitetah zainteresiranih tretjih oseb za zaslišanje, razen če bi takšno razkritje resno škodovalo neki osebi ali nekemu podjetju.
At the request of parties to whom the Authority has addressed a statement of objections or other involved parties, the hearing officer shall conduct an oral hearing so that such parties can further develop their written submissions.
Na zahtevo strank, na katere je Nadzorni organ naslovil obvestilo o nasprotovanju, ali drugih udeleženih strank pooblaščenec za zaslišanje opravi ustno zaslišanje, da lahko te stranke podrobneje pojasnijo svoja pisna stališča.
The hearing officer may, where appropriate and after consulting the director of the Competition and State Aid Directorate, decide to afford complainants and interested third persons within the meaning of Article 5 the opportunity to express their views at the oral hearing of the parties to whom a statement of objections has been issued, provided they so request in their written comments.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje lahko, kadar je ustrezno, in po posvetovanju z direktorjem Direktorata za konkurenco in državno pomoč odloči, da bo pritožnikom in zainteresiranim tretjim osebam v smislu člena 5 dal priložnost, da svoja stališča izrazijo na ustnem zaslišanju strank, katerim je bilo izdano obvestilo o nasprotovanju, če to zahtevajo v pisnih pripombah.
The hearing officer may also invite representatives from competition authorities from third countries to attend the oral hearing as observers.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje lahko na ustno zaslišanje kot opazovalce povabi tudi predstavnike organov, pristojnih za konkurenco, iz tretjih držav.
ACCESS TO FILE, CONFIDENTIALITY AND BUSINESS SECRETS
DOSTOP DO SPISA, ZAUPNOST IN POSLOVNE SKRIVNOSTI
Access to file and access to documents and information
Dostop do spisa ter dostop do dokumentov in informacij
Where a party which has exercised its right of access to the file has reason to believe that the Authority has in its possession documents which have not been disclosed to it and that those documents are necessary for the proper exercise of the right to be heard, it may make a reasoned request for access to these documents to the hearing officer, subject to Article 3(7).
Kadar stranka, ki je uveljavljala svojo pravico do dostopa do spisa, upravičeno domneva, da ima Nadzorni organ dokumente, ki ji niso bili razkriti, ter da so ti dokumenti potrebni za ustrezno uveljavljanje njene pravice do zaslišanja, lahko za dostop do teh dokumentov poda obrazloženo zahtevo pooblaščencu za zaslišanje v skladu s členom 3(7).
Other involved parties who have reason to believe that they have not been informed of the objections addressed to the notifying parties in accordance with Article 13(2) of Chapter V of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
druge udeležene stranke, ki upravičeno domnevajo, da niso bile obveščene o nasprotovanjih, naslovljenih na priglasitelje v skladu s členom 13(2) poglavja V Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču;
A complainant who has been informed by the Authority of its intention to reject a complaint pursuant to Article 7(1) of Chapter III of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement and has reason to believe that the Authority has in its possession documents which have not been disclosed to it and that those documents are necessary for the proper exercise of its rights in accordance with Article 8(1) of Chapter III of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
pritožnik, ki ga je Nadzorni organ obvestil o nameravani zavrnitvi pritožbe na podlagi člena 7(1) poglavja III Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, in ki upravičeno domneva, da ima Nadzorni organ dokumente, ki mu niso bili razkriti, ter da so ti dokumenti potrebni za ustrezno uveljavljanje njegovih pravic v skladu s členom 8(1) poglavja III Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču;
A complainant who considers that it has not received a copy of the non-confidential version of the statement of objections in accordance with Article 6(1) of Chapter III of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement or that the non-confidential version of the statement of objections has not been established in a manner which enables it to exercise its rights effectively, with the exception of cases where the settlement procedure applies.
pritožnik, ki meni, da ni prejel kopije nezaupne različice obvestila o nasprotovanju v skladu s členom 6(1) poglavja III Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču ali da nezaupna različica obvestila o nasprotovanju ni bila pripravljena na način, ki mu omogoča učinkovito uveljavljanje njegovih pravic, razen zadev, za katere se uporablja postopek poravnave;
An interested third person within the meaning of Article 5 of this Decision who has reason to believe that it has not been informed of the nature and subject matter of a procedure in accordance with Article 13(1) of Chapter III of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement and Article 16(1) of Chapter V of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
zainteresirana tretja oseba v smislu člena 5 tega sklepa, ki upravičeno domneva, da ni bila obveščena o vrsti in vsebini postopka v skladu s členom 13(1) poglavja III Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču in členom 16(1) poglavja V Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
The same applies to a complainant in a case to which the settlement procedure applies who has reason to believe that it has not been informed of the nature and subject matter of the procedure in accordance with Article 6(1) of Chapter III of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Enako velja za pritožnika v zadevi, za katero se uporablja postopek poravnave, ki upravičeno domneva, da ni bil obveščen o vrsti in vsebini postopka v skladu s členom 6(1) poglavja III Protokola 4 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
Article 8 Business secrets and other confidential information
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje sprejme obrazloženi sklep o zahtevi, naslovljeni nanj v skladu z odstavkom 1 ali 2, in ta sklep sporoči osebi, ki je podala zahtevo, in kateri koli drugi osebi, ki je udeležena v postopku.
Where the Authority intends to disclose information which may constitute a business secret or other confidential information of any undertaking or person, the latter shall be informed in writing of this intention and the reasons thereof by the Directorate for Competition and State Aid.
Člen 8
A time limit shall be fixed within which the undertaking or person concerned may submit any written comments.
Poslovne skrivnosti in druge zaupne informacije
If the hearing officer finds that the information may be disclosed because it does not constitute a business secret or other confidential information or because there is an overriding interest in its disclosure that finding shall be stated in a reasoned decision which shall be notified to the undertaking or person concerned.
Kadar namerava Nadzorni organ razkriti informacijo, ki bi lahko pomenila poslovno skrivnost, ali drugo zaupno informacijo katerega koli podjetja ali osebe, Direktorat za konkurenco in državno pomoč to podjetje ali osebo o tem namenu in razlogih za to pisno obvesti.
The decision shall specify the date after which the information will be disclosed.
Določi se rok, v katerem lahko zadevno podjetje ali oseba predloži pisne pripombe.
This date shall not be less than 1 week from the date of notification.
2. Kadar zadevno podjetje ali oseba nasprotuje razkritju informacije, lahko zadevo predloži pooblaščencu za zaslišanje. Če pooblaščenec za zaslišanje ugotovi, da se informacija lahko razkrije, ker ne pomeni poslovne skrivnosti ali druge zaupne informacije ali ker obstaja prednostni interes za njeno razkritje, je ta ugotovitev navedena v obrazloženem sklepu, o katerem se uradno obvesti zadevno podjetje ali oseba. V sklepu se določi datum, po katerem se bodo informacije razkrile. Ta datum ni manj kot en teden od dneva uradnega obvestila.
Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the disclosure of information by publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement thereto.
Odstavka 1 in 2 se smiselno uporabljata za razkritje informacij z objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in v Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije.
Where appropriate in order to balance the effective exercise of a party’s rights of defence with legitimate interests of confidentiality, the hearing officer may decide that parts of the file which are indispensable for the exercise of the party’s rights of defence will be made accessible to the party requesting access in a restricted manner, the details of which shall be determined by the hearing officer.
Kadar je to primerno za ohranitev ravnotežja med učinkovitim uveljavljanjem pravic obrambe stranke in legitimnimi interesi glede zaupnosti, lahko pooblaščenec za zaslišanje odloči, da bodo stranki, ki zahteva dostop, lahko razkriti deli spisa, ki so nujno potrebni za uveljavljanje njenih pravic obrambe, na omejen način, katerega podrobnosti določi pooblaščenec za zaslišanje.
If an addressee of a statement of objections considers that the time limit imposed for its reply to the statement of objections is too short, it may seek an extension of that time limit by means of a reasoned request addressed to the director of the Competition and State Aid Directorate.
Če naslovnik obvestila o nasprotovanju meni, da je rok za njegov odgovor na obvestilo o nasprotovanju prekratek, lahko zaprosi za podaljšanje tega roka z obrazloženo zahtevo, naslovljeno na direktorja Direktorata za konkurenco in državno pomoč.
Such a request must be made in due time before the expiry of the original time limit in proceedings pursuant to Articles 53 and 54 of the EEA Agreement and at least 5 working days before the expiry of the original time limit in proceedings under Article 57 of the EEA Agreement.
Tako zahtevo je treba predložiti pravočasno pred potekom prvotnega roka v postopkih na podlagi členov 53 in 54 Sporazuma EGP ter vsaj pet delovnih dni pred potekom prvotnega roka v postopkih na podlagi člena 57 Sporazuma EGP.
After hearing the director of the Competition and State Aid Directorate, the hearing officer shall decide on whether an extension of the time limit is necessary to allow the addressee of a statement of objections to exercise its right to be heard effectively, while also having regard to the need to avoid undue delay in proceedings.
Po zaslišanju direktorja Direktorata za konkurenco in državno pomoč pooblaščenec za zaslišanje odloči, ali je potrebno podaljšanje roka, da bi se naslovniku obvestila o nasprotovanju omogočilo učinkovito uveljavljanje pravice do zaslišanja, ob upoštevanju potrebe po izogibanju neutemeljenim odložitvam v postopkih.
In proceedings pursuant to Articles 53 and 54 of the EEA Agreement, the hearing officer shall take into account, among others, the following elements:
V postopkih v skladu s členoma 53 in 54 Sporazuma EGP pooblaščenec med drugim upošteva naslednje elemente:
For the purposes of assessing point (a) of the first subparagraph, the number of infringements, the alleged duration of the infringement(s), the size and number of documents and the size and complexity of expert studies may be taken into consideration.
Za namene ocene iz točke (a) iz prvega pododstavka se lahko upošteva število kršitev, domnevno trajanje kršitve ali kršitev, obseg in število dokumentov ter obseg in kompleksnost strokovnih študij.
If other involved parties, a complainant or an interested third person within the meaning of Article 5 considers that the time limit to make its views known is too short, it may seek an extension of that time limit by means of a reasoned request addressed to the director of the Competition and State Aid Directorate in due time before the expiry of the original time limit.
Če druge udeležene stranke, pritožnik ali zainteresirana tretja oseba v smislu člena 5 menijo, da je rok za predložitev njihovega stališča prekratek, lahko zaprosijo za podaljšanje tega roka z obrazloženo zahtevo, pravočasno naslovljeno na direktorja Direktorata za konkurenco in državno pomoč pred potekom prvotnega roka.
After hearing the director of the Competition and State Aid Directorate, the hearing officer shall decide on whether an extension of the time limit should be granted.
Po zaslišanju direktorja Direktorata za konkurenco in državno pomoč pooblaščenec za zaslišanje odloči, ali bi bilo treba odobriti podaljšanje roka.
The hearing officer shall organise and conduct the hearings provided for in the provisions implementing Articles 53, 54 and 57 of the EEA Agreement.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje organizira in vodi zaslišanja, opredeljena v določbah, ki izvajajo člene 53, 54 in 57 Sporazuma EGP.
The hearing officer shall ensure that the oral hearing provides addressees of the statement of objections, other involved parties, as well as complainants and interested third persons within the meaning of Article 5 which have been admitted to the oral hearing, with sufficient opportunity to develop their views as to the preliminary findings of the Authority.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje zagotavlja, da se na ustnem zaslišanju naslovnikom obvestila o nasprotovanju, drugim udeleženim strankam, pritožnikom in zainteresiranim tretjim osebam v smislu člena 5, ki jim je bila omogočena udeležba na ustnem zaslišanju, omogoči zadostna priložnost, da pojasnijo svoja stališča v zvezi s predhodnimi ugotovitvami Nadzornega organa.
In order to ensure the proper preparation of the oral hearing, the hearing officer may, after consulting the director of the Competition and State Aid Directorate, supply in advance to the persons invited to the hearing a list of questions on which they are invited to make known their views.
Za zagotovitev ustrezne priprave ustnega zaslišanja lahko pooblaščenec za zaslišanje po posvetovanju z direktorjem Direktorata za konkurenco in državno pomoč osebam, ki so vabljene na ustno zaslišanje, vnaprej priskrbi seznam vprašanj, v zvezi s katerimi jih vabi, naj izrazijo svoja stališča.