natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mixers incorporating feedingstuffs with high protein content
Mešalniki za pripravo krme z veliko vsebnostjo beljakovin.
Mixers with high production of feedingstuffs
Mešalniki z visoko proizvodnjo krme.
Large number of farms served including farms which keep ruminants
Veliko število oskrbovanih kmetij, vključno s kmetijami, kjer redijo prežvekovalce.
Vehicles used for the transportation of processed animal proteins and feedingstuffs
Prevozna sredstva za prevažanje predelanih živalskih beljakovin in krme.
Vehicles with previous history, or suspicion, of non-compliance
Prevozna sredstva, za katera so že ugotovili kršitve ali zanje obstaja tak sum.
As an alternative to these indicative premises and criteria, EFTA States may forward their own risk assessment to the EFTA Surveillance Authority before 30 April 2004.
Druga možnost za te okvirne tovarniške prostore in merila je, da lahko države EFTE pred 30. aprilom 2004 pošljejo lastno oceno Nadzornemu organu EFTA.
Sampling should be targeted on batches or events where cross-contamination with prohibited processed proteins is most likely (first batch after the transport of feedingstuffs containing animal protein prohibited in this batch, technical problems or changes in production lines, changes in storage bunkers or silos for bulk material).
Vzorčenje mora biti usmerjeno na serije ali primere, kjer je možnost navzkrižne okužbe s prepovedanimi predelanimi beljakovinami najverjetnejša (prva serija po prevozu krme, ki vsebuje živalske beljakovine, prepovedane v tej seriji; tehnične težave ali menjava proizvodnih linij; spremembe v skladiščih ali silosih za snovi v razsutem stanju).
The minimum number of inspections per year in an EFTA State should be 10 per 100000 tonnes of compound feed produced.
Najmanjše število inšpekcijskih nadzorov na leto v državi EFTE naj bi bilo 10 na 100000 ton proizvedene krmne mešanice.
The minimum number of official samples per year in an EFTA State should be 20 per 100000 tonnes of compound feed produced.
Najmanjše število uradnih vzorcev na leto v državi EFTE naj bi bilo 20 na 100000 ton proizvedene krmne mešanice.
Pending the approval of alternative methods, microscopic identification and estimation as described in Commission Directive 98/88/EC of 13 November 1998 establishing guidelines for the microscopic identification and estimation of constituents of animal origin for the official control of feedingstuffs [2] should be used for analysing samples.
Do odobritve alternativnih metod je treba za analizo vzorcev uporabiti mikroskopsko identifikacijo in ocenjevanje, kot je to opisano v Direktivi Komisije 98/88/ES z dne 13. novembra 1998 o določitvi smernic za mikroskopsko identifikacijo in oceno sestavin živalskega izvora za uradni nadzor krme [2].
Any presence of prohibited constituents of animal origin in feedingstuffs should be considered as a breach of the feed ban.The results of the inspection programmes should be communicated to the EFTA Surveillance Authority using the following formats:
Vsaka prisotnost prepovedanih vsebin živalskega izvora v krmi se obravnava kot kršitev prepovedi krmljenja.Rezultate programov nadzora je treba sporočiti Nadzornemu organu EFTA v naslednjih oblikah:
Summary of checks concerning feeding restrictions for feed of animal origin (feeding of prohibited processed animal proteins)
Povzetek pregledov, ki zadevajo omejitve krmil živalskega izvora (krmljenje z nedovoljenimi predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami)
Documented inspections
Dokumentirani inšpekcijski nadzori
Number of inspections comprising checks on the presence of processed animal proteins
Število inšpekcijskih nadzorov, ki zajemajo preglede prisotnosti predelanih živalskih beljakovin
Number of breaches based on documentary checks etc. rather than laboratory testing
Število kršitev, ugotovljenih bolj na podlagi preverjanja listin itd. kot pa z opravljenimi preskusi v laboratoriju
Home mixers/mobile mixers
Domači mešalniki/ premični mešalniki
Farms keeping non-ruminants
Kmetije, kjer redijo neprežvekovalce
Farms keeping ruminants
Kmetije, kjer redijo prežvekovalce
Sampling and testing of feed materials and compound feedingstuffs for processed animal proteins
Vzorčenje in testiranje posamičnih krmil in krmnih mešanic na predelane živalske beljakovine
Number of non-compliant samples
Število vzorcev, ki ne izpolnjujejo zahtev
At import
Pri uvozu
Summary of prohibited processed animal proteins found in samples of feedingstuffs intended for ruminants
Povzetek nedovoljenih predelanih živalskih beljakovin, najdenih v vzorcih krme, ki je namenjena prežvekovalcem
Type, degree and origin of contamination
Tip, stopnja in izvor okužbe
In addition, EFTA States should analyse fats and vegetable oils intended for feedingstuffs for the presence of traces of bones and include the results of such analyses in the report referred to in paragraph 2 of this Recommendation.
Poleg tega bi morale države EFTE analizirati maščobe in rastlinska olja, namenjena za krmo, na navzočnost sledi kosti, ter vključiti rezultate teh analiz v poročilo iz odstavka 2 tega priporočila.
Procedures for selection and assessment of supplies of feed materials of industrial origin
Postopki za izbiro in ocenitev dobave posamičnih krmil industrijskega izvora
The competent authorities should identify and shortly describe the procedures followed by manufacturers of compound feedingstuffs in order to select and assess supplies of feed materials of industrial origin.
Pristojni organi morajo označiti in na kratko opisati postopke, ki jih opravljajo proizvajalci krmnih mešanic, da bi tako izbrali in ocenili dobavo posamičnih krmil industrijskega izvora.
Some procedures may be related to the prior establishment of characteristics or requirements for the products to be supplied, or for the suppliers.
Nekateri postopki se lahko nanašajo na predhodno ugotovitev značilnosti ali zahtev za proizvod, ki ga je treba dobaviti, ali za dobavitelje.
Other procedures may be related to own-checks for the verification of compliance with certain parameters, carried out by manufacturers of compound feedingstuffs at the reception of supplies.
Drugi postopki se lahko nanašajo na lastne preglede za preverjanje skladnosti z določenimi parametri, ki jih izvajajo proizvajalci krmnih mešanic ob prejemu dobav.
For each identified procedure (procedure for selection and assessment of supplies), the competent authorities should indicate the advantages and disadvantages of the application of the procedure in terms of feed safety.
Za vsak identificirani postopek (postopek izbire in ocene dobav) morajo pristojni organi določiti prednosti in slabosti uporabe postopka glede na varnost krme.
Finally they should assess whether, taking into account the potential risks, each procedure is acceptable, insufficient or unacceptable for ensuring the safety of feedingstuffs, stating the reasons leading to that conclusion.
Končno morajo za vsak postopek oceniti, ali je ob upoštevanju možnih tveganj sprejemljiv, nezadosten ali nesprejemljiv za zagotavljanje varnosti krme, in navesti razloge, ki so jih pripeljali do tega zaključka.
Evaluation of procedures
Vrednotenje postopkov
Procedure (short description, including criteria for acceptance/rejection of feed materials)
Postopek (kratek opis, vključno z merili sprejema/zavrnitve posamičnih krmil)
Disadvantages
Slabosti
Assessment of acceptability of procedures
Ocena sprejemljivosti postopkov
No 90/04/COL
št. 90/04/COL
amending for the forty-sixth time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by introducing a new Chapter 24C: The application of the State aid rules to public service broadcasting
o šestinštirideseti spremembi postopkovnih in vsebinskih pravil na področju državne pomoči z uvedbo novega poglavja 24C: Uporaba pravil o državni pomoči za javno radiodifuzijo
HAVING REGARD TO the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice [2], in particular to Article 24, Article 5(2)(b) and Article 1 in Part I of Protocol 3 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami EFTE o ustanovitvi Nadzornega organa in Sodišča [2] in zlasti člena 24, člena 5(2)(b) ter člena 1 iz dela I Protokola 3 k Sporazumu,
WHEREAS under Article 24 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall give effect to the provisions of the EEA Agreement concerning State aid,
KER v skladu s členom 24 Sporazuma o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču Nadzorni organ EFTA izvaja določbe Sporazuma EGP v zvezi z državno pomočjo,
WHEREAS under Article 5(2)(b) of the Surveillance and Court Agreement the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall issue notices or guidelines on matters dealt with in the EEA Agreement, if that Agreement or the Surveillance and Court Agreement expressly so provides or if the EFTA Surveillance Authority considers it necessary,
KER v skladu s členom 5(2)(b) Sporazuma o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču Nadzorni organ EFTA izdaja obvestila ali smernice o zadevah, ki jih obravnava Sporazum EGP, če to izrecno določata Sporazum EGP ali Sporazum o Nadzornem organu in Sodišču oziroma če Nadzorni organ EFTA meni, da je to potrebno,
RECALLING the Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid [3] adopted on 19 January 1994 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority [4],WHEREAS, on 17 October 2001, the European Commission adopted a new Communication setting out the principles for the application of the State aid rules to public service broadcasting [5],WHEREAS this Communication is also of relevance for the European Economic Area,
OB SKLICEVANJU na Postopkovna in vsebinska pravila na področju državne pomoči [3], ki jih je 19. januarja 1994 sprejel Nadzorni organ EFTA [4],KER je 17. oktobra 2001 Evropska komisija sprejela novo sporočilo, ki določa načela za uporabo pravil o državni pomoči za javno radiodifuzijo [5],KER je to sporočilo pomembno tudi za Evropski gospodarski prostor,
WHEREAS, according to point II under the heading ‘GENERAL’ at the end of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority is to adopt, after consultation with the Commission, acts corresponding to those adopted by the European Commission,
KER mora Nadzorni organ EFTA, v skladu s točko II naslova „SPLOŠNO“ na koncu Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP, po posvetovanju s Komisijo sprejeti akte, ustrezajoče aktom, ki jih je sprejela Evropska komisija,
RECALLING that the EFTA Surveillance Authority has consulted the EFTA States in a multilateral meeting on the subject,
OB SKLICEVANJU na dejstvo, da se je Nadzorni organ EFTA o tej zadevi posvetoval z državami EFTE na večstranskem sestanku –
The State Aid Guidelines shall be amended by introducing a new Chapter 24C, Application of State aid rules to public service broadcasting.
Smernice o državni pomoči se spremenijo z uvedbo novega poglavja 24C, Uporaba pravil o državni pomoči za javno radiodifuzijo.
The new chapter is contained in Annex I to this Decision.
Novo poglavje je v Prilogi I k tej odločbi.
The EFTA States shall be informed by means of a letter, including a copy of this Decision and including the Annex thereto.
Države EFTE se obvestijo z dopisom, ki vključuje izvod te odločbe in njeno prilogo.
The European Commission shall be informed, in accordance with point (d) of Protocol 27 of the EEA Agreement, by means of a copy of this Decision, including the Annex.
3. Evropska komisija se obvesti z izvodom te odločbe, vključno s prilogo, v skladu s točko (d) Protokola 27 k Sporazumu EGP.
The Decision, including Annex I, shall be published in the EEA Section of and in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union.
Odločba, vključno s Prilogo I, se objavi v poglavju EGP in dodatku EGP Uradnega lista Evropskih skupnosti.
The Decision shall be authentic in the English language.
Odločba je verodostojna v angleškem jeziku.
Done at Brussels, 23 April 2004.
V Bruslju, 23. aprila 2004
Initially published in OJ L 231, 3.9.1994, and in the EEA Supplement thereto No 32 on the same date, last amended by Decision No 62/04/COL of 31 March 2004 (not yet published).
Prvotno objavljeno v UL L 231, 3.9.1994, in istega dne v dodatku EGP št. 32 k navedenemu UL, nazadnje spremenjeno z Odločbo št. 62/04/COL z dne 31.3.2004 (še ni objavljeno).
Communication from the Commission on the application of State aid rules to public service broadcasting, OJ C 320, 15.11.2001, p. 5.
Sporočilo Komisije o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za javno radiodifuzijo, UL C 320, 15.11.2001, str. 5.
THE APPLICATION OF THE STATE AID RULES TO PUBLIC SERVICE BROADCASTING [1]
UPORABA PRAVIL O DRŽAVNI POMOČI ZA JAVNO RADIODIFUZIJO [1]
Over the last two decades, broadcasting has undergone important changes.
V zadnjih dveh desetletjih je prišlo na področju radiodifuzije do pomembnih sprememb.
The abolition of monopolies, the emergence of new players and rapid technological developments have fundamentally altered the competitive environment.
Odprava monopolov, pojav novih akterjev in hiter tehnološki razvoj so bistveno spremenili konkurenčno okolje.
Television broadcasting was traditionally a reserved activity.
Televizijska radiodifuzija je bila po tradiciji dejavnost omejene konkurence.
Since its inception, it has mostly been provided by public undertakings under a monopoly regime, mainly as a consequence of the limited availability of broadcasting frequencies and the high barriers to entry.
Že od samega začetka so jo večinoma monopolno izvajala javna podjetja, kar je bila predvsem posledica omejene razpoložljivosti radiodifuznih frekvenc in visokih ovir za vstop.
In the 1970s, however, economic and technological developments made it increasingly possible for the EFTA States to allow other operators to broadcast.
V sedemdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja pa je začel gospodarski in tehnološki razvoj državam EFTE vedno bolj omogočati, da so v radiodifuzno dejavnost spuščale tudi druge operaterje.
EFTA States have therefore decided to introduce competition in the market.
Zato so se države EFTE odločile, da bodo na trg vpeljale konkurenco.
This has led to a wider choice for consumers, as many additional channels and new services have become available; it has also favoured the emergence and growth of strong European operators, the development of new technologies, and a larger degree of pluralism in the sector.
To je povečalo izbiro za uporabnike, saj so dobili na voljo mnoge dodatne kanale in nove storitve, poleg tega pa je ugodno vplivalo na pojav in rast močnih evropskih operaterjev, razvoj novih tehnologij in večji pluralizem v sektorju.
Whilst opening the market to competition, EFTA States considered that public service broadcasting ought to be maintained, as a way to ensure the coverage of a number of areas and the satisfaction of needs that private operators would not necessarily fulfil to the optimal extent.
Ob odpiranju trga konkurenci so države EFTE menile, da bi bilo treba javno radiodifuzijo ohraniti, saj bi tako zagotovili pokritje številnih območij in zadovoljitev potreb, ki jih zasebni operaterji verjetno ne bi mogli optimalno zadovoljiti.
The increased competition, together with the presence of State-funded operators, has also led to growing concerns for a level playing field, which have been brought to the Authority's attention by private operators.
Večja konkurenca je ob navzočnosti državno financiranih operaterjev pripeljala tudi do vedno večje zaskrbljenosti glede enakih pogojev delovanja, na katero so Nadzorni organ opozorili zasebni operaterji.
The complaints allege infringements of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement in relation to the public funding schemes established in favour of public service broadcasters.
Pritožbe zadevajo kršitve člena 61 Sporazuma EGP v zvezi s programi javnega financiranja, uvedenimi v korist javnim radiodifuznim organizacijam.
These guidelines set out the principles to be followed by the Authority in the application of Articles 61 and 59(2) of the EEA Agreement to State funding of public service broadcasting.
Te smernice določajo načela, ki jih mora upoštevati Nadzorni organ pri uporabi členov 61 in 59(2) Sporazuma EGP za državno financiranje javne radiodifuzije.
This will make the Authority’s policy in this area as transparent as possible.
Tako bo politika Nadzornega organa na tem področju kar najbolj pregledna.
The Role of Public Service Broadcasting
Vloga javne radiodifuzije
As stated by the Resolution of the EC Council and of Representatives of the Governments of the EC Member States of 1 January 1999 concerning public service broadcasting (hereinafter referred to as ‘Resolution on public service broadcasting’) [2], ‘public service broadcasting in view of its cultural, social and democratic functions which it discharges for the common good has a vital significance for ensuring democracy, pluralism social cohesion, cultural and linguistic diversity’.
Kakor navaja Resolucija Sveta ES in predstavnikov vlad držav članic ES z dne 1. januarja 1999 v zvezi z javno radiodifuzijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Resolucija o javni radiodifuziji“) [2], „je javna radiodifuzija glede na svojo kulturno, socialno in demokratično funkcijo, ki jo prispeva k skupnemu dobremu, bistvenega pomena za zagotavljanje demokracije, pluralizma, socialne kohezije ter kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti“.
Public service broadcasting, although having a clear economic relevance, is not comparable to a public service in any other economic sector.
Kljub njenemu očitnemu gospodarskemu pomenu pa javne difuzije ni mogoče primerjati z javno storitvijo v katerem koli drugem gospodarskem sektorju.
There is no other service that at the same time has access to such a wide sector of the population, provides it with so much information and content, and by doing so conveys and influences both individual and public opinion.
Nobena druga storitev ni takšna, da bi sočasno imela dostop do tako širokega sektorja prebivalstva, mu zagotavljala toliko informacij in vsebine ter s tem oblikovala mnenje posameznikov in javno mnenje ter vplivala nanj.
Public service broadcasting has an important role to play in promoting cultural diversity in each country, in providing educational programming, in objectively informing the public, in guaranteeing pluralism and in supplying quality entertainment, democratically and free-of-charge [3].
Javna radiodifuzija mora imeti pomembno vlogo pri demokratičnem in brezplačnem spodbujanju kulturne raznolikosti v vsaki državi, pripravi izobraževalnih programskih vsebin, objektivnem obveščanju javnosti, zagotavljanju pluralizma in ponudbi kakovostnega razvedrila [3].
Furthermore, broadcasting is generally perceived as a very reliable source of information and represents, for a not inconsiderable proportion of the population, the main source of information.
Poleg tega velja radiodifuzija na splošno za zelo zanesljiv vir informacij in je glavni vir informacij precejšnjemu deležu prebivalstva.
It thus enriches public debate and ultimately ensures that all citizens participate to a fair degree in public life.
Tako bogati javno razpravo in zagotavlja, da vsi državljani dovolj sodelujejo v javnem življenju.
The role of public service [4] in general is recognised by the EEA Agreement.
Vloga javne storitve [4] na splošno je priznana v Sporazumu EGP.
The key provision in this respect is Article 59(2) of the EEA Agreement, which reads as follows: ‘Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in this Agreement, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them.
Ključna določba v zvezi s tem je člen 59(2) Sporazuma EGP, ki se glasi: „Podjetja, pooblaščena za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, oziroma podjetja, ki imajo značaj dohodkovnega monopola, ravnajo po pravilih iz tega sporazuma, zlasti po pravilih o konkurenci, kolikor uporaba takšnih pravil pravno ali dejansko ne ovira izvajanja posebnih nalog, ki so jim dodeljene.
The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Contracting Parties’.
Razvoj trgovine ne sme biti prizadet v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju z interesi pogodbenic.“
The Court of Justice of the European Communities has acknowledged in two cases that the broadcast of television services can be regarded as ‘services of general economic interest’ under Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty [5].
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je v dveh primerih potrdilo, da je radiodifuzijo televizijskih storitev mogoče obravnavati kot „storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena“ v skladu s členom 86(2) Pogodbe ES [5].
The European Court of Justice has stressed that these services are subject to the competition provisions unless it is demonstrated that to apply those rules would be incompatible with the performance of their tasks [6].
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je poudarilo, da za te storitve veljajo določbe o konkurenci, razen če ni ugotovljeno, da bi bila uporaba navedenih pravil nezdružljiva z izvajanjem njihovih nalog [6].
The Resolution on public service broadcasting, taking the particular nature of the broadcasting sector into account, stated the principles and conditions according to which the provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Communities should be applied to this sector:
Resolucija o javni radiodifuziji je, upoštevajoč posebno naravo radiodifuznega sektorja, navedla načela in pogoje, v skladu s katerimi naj bi se za ta sektor uporabljale določbe Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti:
‘The provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Community shall be without prejudice to the competence of Member States to provide for the funding of public service broadcasting insofar as such funding is granted to broadcasting organisations for the fulfillment of the public service remit as conferred, defined and organised by each Member State, and insofar as such funding does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Community to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest, while the realisation of the remit of that public service shall be taken into account’.
„Določbe Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ne posegajo v pristojnost držav članic glede financiranja javne radiodifuzije, če je takšno financiranje odobreno radiodifuznim organizacijam za izpolnjevanje odgovornosti javne storitve, kakor jo naloži, opredeli in organizira vsaka država članica, in če ne vpliva toliko na trgovinske pogoje in konkurenco v Skupnosti, da bi bilo to v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi, pri čemer je treba upoštevati uresničevanje odgovornosti te javne storitve.“
As the Resolution is incorporated into the EEA Agreement as an act which the Contracting Parties shall take note of [7], similar principles as those quoted would be applicable in the EEA.
Ker je resolucija vključena v Sporazum EGP kot akt, s katerim se seznanijo pogodbenice [7], se načela, podobna navedenim, uporabljajo v EGP.
The Resolution on public service broadcasting further reaffirmed the importance of public service broadcasting for social, democratic and cultural life.
Resolucija o javni radiodifuziji je še potrdila pomen javne radiodifuzije za socialno, demokratično in kulturno življenje.
‘Broad public access, without discrimination and on the basis of equal opportunities, to various channels and services is a necessary precondition for fulfilling the special obligation of public service broadcasting’. Moreover, public service broadcasting needs to ‘benefit from technological progress’, bring ‘the public the benefits of the new audiovisual and information services and the new technologies’ and to undertake ‘the development and diversification of activities in the digital age’.
„Dostop širše javnosti, brez razlikovanja in na podlagi enakih možnosti, do različnih kanalov in storitev je nujen pogoj za izpolnjevanje posebne obveznosti javne radiodifuzije.“ Poleg tega mora javna radiodifuzija „izkoristiti tehnološki napredek“, zagotoviti „javnosti koristi, ki jih prinašajo nove avdiovizualne in informacijske storitve ter nove tehnologije,“ in poskrbeti za „razvoj in diverzifikacijo dejavnosti v digitalni dobi“.