natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EFTA States shall as necessary amend other existing aid schemes in order to ensure that any regional bonuses such as those allowed for training aid, aid for research and development or environment aid may only be granted after 31 December 2006 in areas which are eligible for support under Article 61(3)(c) in accordance with the regional aid map adopted by the Authority in force on the date the aid is granted.
države Efte po potrebi spremenijo druge obstoječe sheme pomoči, da se zagotovi, da se kakršni koli regionalni dodatki, kot so tisti, ki so dovoljeni za pomoč za usposabljanje, pomoč za raziskave in razvoj ali okoljsko pomoč, lahko dodelijo le po 31. decembru 2006 v območjih, ki so upravičena za podporo iz člena 61(3)(a)(c) v skladu s karto regionalne pomoči, ki jo je sprejel Nadzorni organ in ki velja na datum, ko je bila pomoč dodeljena.
The Authority will invite EFTA States to confirm their acceptance of these proposals within one month.
Nadzorni organ bo pozval države Efte, naj potrdijo sprejem teh predlogov v enem mesecu.
In addition, the Authority considers that further measures are necessary to improve the transparency of regional aid.
Poleg tega Nadzorni organ meni, da so potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi za izboljšanje preglednosti regionalne pomoči.
In particular, it appears necessary to ensure that the EFTA States, economic operators, interested parties and indeed the Authority itself should have easy access to the full text of all applicable regional aid schemes in the EFTA States.
Zlasti se zdi potrebno, da se zagotovi, da imajo države Efte, gospodarski subjekti, zainteresirane strani in celo sam Nadzorni organ preprost dostop do celotnega besedila vseh veljavnih shem regionalne pomoči v državah Efte.
The Authority considers that this can easily be achieved through the establishment of linked internet sites.
Nadzorni organ meni, da je to mogoče enostavno doseči z vzpostavitvijo povezanih spletnih strani.
For this reason, when examining regional aid schemes, the Authority will systematically seek an undertaking from the EFTA State that the full text of the final aid scheme will be published on the internet and that the internet address of the publication will be communicated to the Authority.
Zato bo Nadzorni organ pri pregledu shem regionalne pomoči sistematično zahteval od držav Efte, da se zavežejo k objavi celotnega besedila končne sheme pomoči na spletu in da Nadzornemu organu sporočijo spletni naslov objave.
Projects for which expenses were incurred before the date of publication of the scheme will not be eligible for regional aid.
Projekti, za katere bodo stroški nastali pred datumom objave sheme, ne bodo upravičeni do regionalne pomoči.
The Authority may decide to review or amend these guidelines at any time if this should be necessary for reasons associated with competition policy or in order to take account of other EEA policies and international commitments.
Nadzorni organ se lahko kadar koli odloči za pregled ali spremembo teh smernic, če bi bilo to potrebno zaradi razlogov, povezanih s politiko konkurence, ali zaradi upoštevanja drugih politik EGP in mednarodnih obveznosti.
Definition of the steel industry
Opredelitev jeklarske industrije
The steel industry, for the purposes of these guidelines consists of the undertakings engaged in the production of the steel products listed below:
Jeklarsko industrijo za namene teh smernic sestavljajo spodaj navedena podjetja, ki se ukvarjajo s proizvodnjo jeklenih proizvodov:
Ferrous products obtained by direct reduction of iron ore and other spongy ferrous products
Železo dobljeno z direktno redukcijo železove rude in drugi gobasti izdelki iz železa
Iron and non-alloy Steel
Železo in nelegirano jeklo
Flat-rolled products of iron and non-alloy steel
Ploščato valjani izdelki iz železa in nelegiranega jekla
Bars and rods, hot rolled, in irregularly wound coils, of iron or non alloy steel
Žica, vroče valjana, v ohlapnih kolobarjih, iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla
Angles, shapes and sections of iron or non-alloy steel
Profili, L profili in deli iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla
Stainless steel
Nerjavno jeklo
Flat rolled products of other alloy steel
Ploščato valjani izdelki iz drugih legiranih jekel;
Bars and rods of other alloys steels
Votle palice iz drugih legiranih jekel
Seamless tubes, pipes and hollow profiles
Brezšivne cevi, cevi in votli profili
Welded iron or steel tubes and pipes, the external diameter of which exceeds 406,4 mm
Varjene železne ali jeklene, cevi, katerih zunanji premer presega 406,4 mm
Definition of the synthetic fibres industry
Opredelitev industrije sintetičnih vlaken
The synthetic fibres industry is defined, for the purposes of these guidelines, as:
Industrija sintetičnih vlaken je za namene teh smernic opredeljena kot:
extrusion/texturisation of all generic types of fibre and yarn based on polyester, polyamide, acrylic or polypropylene, irrespective of their end-uses, or
iztiskanje/tkanje vseh določenih vrst vlaken in prej na osnovi poliestra, poliamida, akrila ali polipropilena, za katero koli končno uporabo, ali
polymerisation (including polycondensation) where it is integrated with extrusion in terms of the machinery used, or
polimerizacija (vključno s polikondenzacijo), kadar je ta vključena v iztiskanje na ravni uporabljenih strojev, ali
any ancillary process linked to the contemporaneous installation of extrusion/texturisation capacity by the prospective beneficiary or by another company in the group to which it belongs and which, in the specific business activity concerned, is normally integrated with such capacity in terms of the machinery used.
vsak postopek, ki spada zraven in je povezan z istočasno namestitvijo zmogljivosti iztiskanja/tkanja, ki jo opravi prihodnji upravičenec ali druga družba v skupini, ki ji pripada, ter ki je pri zadevni posebni industrijski dejavnosti običajno vključen v to zmogljivost na ravni uporabljene opreme.
Form of the provision of summary information for aid for large investment projects requested in paragraph (54)
Obrazec za predložitev povzetka podatkov za pomoč za večje naložbene projekte, zaprošen v odstavku 54
Aid in favour of (name of the company/companies receiving the aid):
Pomoč za (ime podjetja/podjetij, ki prejme(-jo) pomoč):
Aid scheme reference (Authority reference of the existing scheme or schemes under which the aid is awarded):
Referenčna oznaka sheme pomoči (referenčna oznaka Nadzornega organa za obstoječo shemo ali sheme, v okviru katere ali katerih je dodeljena pomoč):
EFTA State where the investment takes place:
Država Efte, v kateri se izvede naložba:
Region (NUTS-III level) where the investment takes place:
Regija (raven NUTS-III), v kateri se izvede naložba:
Municipality (previously NUTS-V level) where the investment takes place:
Občina (nekdanja raven NUTS-V), v kateri se izvede naložba:
Type of project (setting-up of a new establishment, extension of existing establishment, diversification of output of existing establishment into new, additional products, fundamental change in the overall production process of an existing establishment):
Vrsta projekta (ustanovitev novega obrata, razširitev obstoječega obrata, diverzifikacija proizvodnje obstoječega obrata v nov, dodaten proizvod, temeljita sprememba splošnega proizvodnega procesa v obstoječem obratu):
Products manufactured or services provided on the basis of the investment project (with Prodcom/Nace nomenclature or CPA nomenclature for projects in the service sectors):
Proizvodi ali storitve, proizvedeni oziroma ponujene na osnovi naložbenega projekta (z nomenklaturo PRODCOM/NACE ali nomenklaturo CPA za projekte v storitvenem sektorju):
Short description of investment project:
Kratek opis naložbenega projekta:
Discounted eligible cost of investment project (in EUR):
Diskontirani upravičeni stroški naložbenega projekta (v EUR):
Aid intensity (% in GGE):
Intenzivnost pomoči (% v BED):
Conditions attached to the payment of the proposed assistance (if any):
Pogoji, povezani s plačilom predlagane pomoči (če obstajajo):
Planned start and end date of the project:
Načrtovan datum začetka in konca projekta:
Chapter 25.B corresponds to Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007 to 2013, OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13.
Poglavje 25.B ustreza sporočilu Komisije – Smernice o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013 (UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str. 13).
Regional top-ups for aid granted for such purposes are therefore not considered as regional aid.
Regionalna dodatna izplačila, dodeljena za take namene, zato ne štejejo kot regionalna pomoč.
The Authority’s guidelines are accessible on: http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/guidelines/
Smernice Nadzornega organa so na voljo na: http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/guidelines/
Paragraph (7), Section 25.4 of the 1999 version of Chapter 25 National Regional Aid, was amended by Chapter 16 — Aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty corresponding to the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 288, 9.10.1999, p. 2).
Odstavek 7, razdelek 25.4 različice poglavja 25 Državna regionalna pomoč iz leta 1999, je bil spremenjen s poglavjem 16 – Pomoč za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah, ki ustreza Smernicam Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (UL C 288, 9.10.1999, str. 2).
Corresponding to Communication from the Commission — Multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects, OJ C 70, 19.3.2002, p. 8, as amended in OJ C 263, 1.11.2003, p. 3.
Ustreza sporočilu Komisije – Večsektorski okvir za regionalno pomoč, namenjeno večjim naložbenim projektom, UL C 70, 19.3.2002, str. 8, kakor je bilo spremenjeno v UL C 263, 1.11.2003, str. 3.
See in this respect the judgment of the European Court of Justice in Case 730/79, Philip Morris [1980], ECR 2671, paragraph 17 and in Case C-169/95, Spain v Commission [1997], ECR I-135, paragraph 20.
V tej zvezi glej sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi 730/79, Philip Morris [1980], Recueil 2671, odstavek 17 in v zadevi C-169/95, Španija proti Komisiji [1997], Recueil I-135, odstavek 20.
See in this respect the judgment of the European Court of First Instance in T-380/94, AIUFFASS and AKT [1996], ECR II-2169, paragraph 54.
V tej zvezi glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje v T-380/94, AIUFFASS in AKT [1996], Recueil II-2169, odstavek 54.
The sectors covered by special rules over and above those set out here are currently: transport and shipbuilding.
Sektorja, za katera veljajo posebna pravila nad temi, ki so določena tukaj, sta trenutno: prevoz in ladjedelništvo.
Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid for small and medium-sized enterprises, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 incorporated into the EEA Agreement through Annex XV point 1(f) by decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 131/2004 of 24.9.2004 (OJ L 64, 10.3.2005, p. 67 and EEA Supplement No 12, p. 42).
Uredba (ES) št. 70/2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči za majhna in srednje velika podjetja, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 364/2004, ki je bila s Sklepom Skupnega odbora EGP št. 131/2004 z dne 24. septembra 2004 (UL L 64, 10.3.2005, str. 67 in Dopolnilo EGP št. 12, str. 42) vključena v Sporazum EGP kot Priloga XV, točka 1f.
In particular, aid granted to large or medium-sized enterprises during the restructuring period must always be notified individually to the Authority, even if it granted as part of an approved scheme.
Zlasti pomoč, dodeljeno velikim ali srednje velikim podjetjem med obdobjem prestrukturiranja, je treba vedno posamično priglasiti Komisiji, tudi če je dodeljena kot del odobrene sheme.
Case 248/84, Germany v Commission [1987], ECR 4013, paragraph 19.
Zadeva 248/84, Nemčija proti Komisiji [1987], Recueil 4013, odstavek 19.
As defined in “Statistical regions in the EFTA countries and in the candidate countries”, 2001 edition by the Commission of the European Communities and the Statistical Office of the European Communities.
Kakor je opredeljeno v ‚Statističnih regijah držav Efte in držav kandidatk‘, izdaja iz leta 2001, Komisija Evropskih skupnosti in Statistični urad Evropskih skupnosti.
The underlying assumption being that the GDP indicator is capable of reflecting synthetically both the phenomena mentioned.
To temelji na predpostavki, da kazalnik BDP lahko skupaj odraža oba omenjena pojava.
In this and all subsequent references to GDP per capita in these guidelines, GDP is measured in terms of purchasing power standards.
V tej in vseh drugih omembah BDP na prebivalca v teh smernicah se BDP meri po standardih kupne moči.
The GDP per capita of each region and the EEA average to be used in the analysis are determined by the Statistical office of the European Communities.
BDP na prebivalca vsake regije in povprečje EGP, ki se uporabljata pri analizi, določi Statistični urad Evropskih skupnosti.
Should this situation change, the Authority would adopt new guidelines to take into account such a modification.
Če bi se ta položaj spremenil, bi Nadzorni organ sprejel nove smernice, ki bi upoštevale tako spremembo.
Footnote 12 supra.
Opomba 12 zgoraj.
When determining the population that may be eligible for regional aid under the corresponding derogation in Article 61(3)(a), the European Commission will proceed in two steps: firstly, it will determine the population coverage by applying the 75 % per capita GDP test described under paragraph (15).
Prebivalstvo, ki je lahko upravičeno do regionalne pomoči v skladu z ustreznim odstopanjem iz člena 61(3)(a), bo Evropska komisija določila v dveh korakih: najprej bo določila obseg prebivalstva z uporabo preskusa 75 % BDP na prebivalca, opisanega v odstavku (15).
Secondly, it will take into account the “statistical effect” regions, i.e. regions for which the GDP per capita exceeds 75 % of the EC-25 average solely because of the statistical effect of enlargement of the EC.
Nato bo upoštevala regije ‚statističnega učinka‘, regije, v katerih BDP na prebivalca presega 75 % povprečja v ES-25 samo zaradi statističnega učinka širitve ES.
These are regions at NUTS II level which have a GDP per capita of more than 75 % of the EC-25 average but less than 75 % of the EC-15 average.
To so regije na ravni NUTS-II, ki imajo BDP na prebivalca več kot 75 % povprečja ES-25, vendar manj kot 75 % povprečja ES-15.
In its corresponding guidelines, the European Commission considers that such regions should continue to remain eligible for the EC derogation corresponding to Article 61(3)(a) on a transitional basis until 31 December 2010.
Evropska komisija v svojih ustreznih smernicah meni, da bi morale biti te regije še naprej upravičene do prehodnega odstopanja ES, ki ustreza členu 61(3)(a), in sicer do 31. decembra 2010.
Such regions are to be distinguished from the “statistical effect” regions (see above, footnote (17)).
Takšne regije je treba ločiti od regij ‚statističnega učinka‘ (glej opombo 17 zgoraj).
These are regions which had a GDP per capita of less than 75 % on an EC-15 basis and which, as a result of their economic development, no longer meet that condition on an EC-15 basis.
To so regije, v katerih je BDP na prebivalca nižji od 75 % na podlagi ES-15 in ki zaradi gospodarskega razvoja ne izpolnjujejo več tega pogoja na podlagi ES-15.
The European Commission has fixed the limit for the overall population coverage to 42 % of the current EC-25 (due to a correction mechanism to ensure that none of the EC-15 Member States loses more than 50 % of their population coverage under their current regional aid maps, the ceiling is fixed in practice to 43,1 %).
Evropska komisija je določila mejo za obseg prebivalstva na 42 % trenutnega položaja v ES-25 (zaradi popravnega mehanizma, s katerim je želela zagotoviti, da nobena od držav članic ES-15 ne bi izgubila več kot 50 % obsega prebivalstva po trenutnih kartah regionalne pomoči, je meja v praksi določena na 43,1 %).
This should be understood as meaning that no region within the EFTA States (i) meets the 75 % per capita GDP test described in paragraph (15) and (ii) qualifies either as a “statistical effect” region or as an “economic development” region.
To je treba razumeti tako, da nobena regija v državah Efte ne (i) ustreza preskusu 75 % BDP na prebivalca, opisanemu v odstavku 15, in (ii) ne izpolnjuje pogojev za regijo ‚statističnega učinka‘ ali regijo ‚gospodarskega razvoja‘.
The actual figure is 2,9 inhabitants per square kilometre.
Dejanska številka je manj kakor 12,5 prebivalca na km2.
According to the current NUTS classification, Iceland makes up, as such, one NUTS III region.
V skladu s trenutno klasifikacijo NUTS ja celotna Islandija ena regija NUTS III.
In the event that this classification is amended by introducing more than one NUTS III region, the national population coverage will be assessed on the basis of the NUTS III level.
Če se ta kvalifikacija spremeni z uvedbo več kot ene regije NUTS III, se bo nacionalni obseg prebivalstva ocenjeval na podlagi ravni NUTS III.
Taking account of its small size, it is sufficient for Iceland that the regions designated have either a GDP per capita which is less than the EFTA average, or an unemployment rate which is higher than 115 % of the national average, and have a minimum population of 10000 inhabitants.
Zaradi majhnosti države je za Islandijo dovolj, da imajo določene regije ali BDP na prebivalca nižji od povprečja Efte ali stopnjo brezposelnosti, ki je višja od 115 % državnega povprečja, ter da imajo vsaj 10000 prebivalcev.
In the rest of the text of these Guidelines, NUTS III regions should, in the case of Iceland, be read as NUTS IV regions where appropriate.
V nadaljevanju teh smernic je v primeru Islandije regije NUTS III treba brati kot regije NUTS IV, kjer je to primerno.
Should the statistical classification of Iceland be amended as described in footnote 22, the text should read as NUTS III regions as appropriate.
Če se statistična klasifikacija Islandije spremeni, kakor je opisano v opombi 22, je treba besedilo brati kot regije NUTS III, kakor je primerno.
In order to prevent double counting, this criterion should be applied on a residual basis, after taking account of the relative wealth of the regions concerned.
V izogib dvojnemu štetju je treba to merilo uporabljati kot dodatno merilo po upoštevanju relativne blaginje zadevnih regij.
For example peninsulas and mountainous regions.
Na primer polotoki in gorate regije.
This minimum limit may be reduced in the case of islands and other areas categorised by similar geographical isolation.
Ta najnižja meja je lahko znižana v primeru otokov in drugih območij podobne geografske izolacije.
Replacement investment may however qualify as operating aid under certain conditions as set out in Section 25.B.5.
Nadomestna naložba pa se lahko kvalificira kot pomoč za tekoče poslovanje pod določenimi pogoji, kot določeno v razdelku 25.B.5.
Consequently, the sole acquisition of the shares of the legal entity of an enterprise does not qualify as initial investment.
Posledično samo pridobitev delnic pravne osebe ali podjetja ne šteje kot začetna naložba.
A job is deemed to be directly created by an investment project if it concerns the activity to which the investment relates and is created within three years of completion of the investment, including jobs created following an increase in the utilisation rate of the capacity created by the investment.
Šteje se, da je delovno mesto povezano z izvedbo naložbenega projekta, če se nanaša na dejavnost, za katero je bila izvedena naložba, in če je ustvarjeno v treh letih po dokončani naložbi, vključno z delovnimi mesti, ki so bila ustvarjena zaradi povečanja stopnje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, ustvarjenih z naložbo.
In the case of aid which is subject to individual notification to and approval by the Authority, confirmation of eligibility must be made conditional on the Authority decision approving the aid.
Pri pomoči, ki jo je treba posamično priglasiti Nadzornemu odboru, ta pa jo mora potem odobriti, mora biti potrditev upravičenosti pogojena z odobritvijo pomoči s strani Nadzornega odbora.
“Start of work” means either the start of construction work or the first firm commitment to order equipment, excluding preliminary feasibility studies.
‚Začetek dela‘ pomeni začetek gradbenih del ali prvo trdno zavezo za naročilo opreme, vendar ne vključuje predhodnih študij izvedljivosti.
The only exception to these rules is in the case of approved tax aid schemes where a tax exemption or reduction is granted automatically to qualifying expenditure without any discretion on the part of the authorities.
Edina izjema tem pravilom je primer odobrenih shem davčne pomoči, kjer je davčna oprostitev ali znižanje odobreno avtomatično za upravičene stroške brez vsake diskrecije s strani organov.
This is for example not the case for a subsidised loan, public equity capital loans or public participations which do not meet the market economy investor principle, state guarantees containing elements of aid, as well as public support granted within the scope of the de minimis rule.
To na primer ne velja za subvencionirano posojilo, javno posojilo za lastni kapital ali javne udeležbe, ki ne ustrezajo vlagateljskemu načelu tržnega gospodarstva, državna poroštva, ki vsebujejo dele pomoči, kot tudi javno pomoč, dodeljeno v okviru pravila de minimis.
This rule shall not prevent the replacement of plant or equipment which has become out-dated within this five-year period due to rapid technological change, provided the economic activity is retained in the region concerned for the minimum period.
To pravilo ne preprečuje nadomestila obratov ali opreme, ki je zaradi hitrih tehnoloških sprememb postala v tem petletnem obdobju zastarela, če gospodarska dejavnost ostane v zadevni regiji za najkrajše obdobje.
The Authority is discontinuing its former practice of converting regional aid notified by EFTA States into net grant equivalents in order to take account of the judgment of the European Court of First Instance of 15 June 2000 in case T-298/97, Alzetta.
Nadzorni organ bo prenehal s prejšnjo prakso, ko je spreminjal regionalno pomoč, o kateri so ga obvestile države Efte, v neto ekvivalent dotacije, in tako upošteval sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 15. junija 2000 v zadevi T-298/97, Alzetta.
In that case, the European Court of First Instance ruled: “The Commission is not empowered, under the State aid monitoring system established by the Treaty, to take into consideration the incidence of tax on the amount of financial aid allocated when it assesses whether it is compatible with the Treaty.
V tej zadevi je Sodišče prve stopnje razsodilo: ‚Po sistemu nadzora državne pomoči, vzpostavljenem s Pogodbo, Komisija pri ocenjevanju, ali je pomoč združljiva s Pogodbo, nima pooblastil za upoštevanje učinka davkov na znesek dodeljene finančne pomoči.
Such charges are not levied specifically on the aid itself but are levied downstream, and apply to the aid in question in the same way as to any income received.
Takšne pristojbine niso zaračunane posebej za pomoč samo, ampak so zaračunane naknadno ter se uporabljajo za zadevno pomoč na enak način kot za vsak prejet prihodek.