natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On the co-existence of existing infrastructure, see Commission Decision N 307/2004, paragraph 45, where it is positively outlined that this minimises the risk of unnecessary duplication and limits the economic impact for operators that already have infrastructure in place.
Glede soobstoja obstoječe infrastrukture glej Odločbo Komisije N 307/2004, odstavek 45, kjer je pozitivno poudarjeno, da to zmanjšuje tveganje neposrednega podvajanja in omejuje gospodarski vpliv za operaterje, ki že imajo nameščeno infrastrukturo.
See also Commission Decision N 199/2004, paragraph 41, N 213/2003, paragraph 47.
Glej tudi Odločbo Komisije N 199/2004, odstavek 41, N 213/2003, odstavek 47.
Teleglobe has survived the earlier Chapter 11 proceedings and is currently a Nasdaq trading company.
Teleglobe je preživel prejšnji postopek po členu 11 in je trenutno trgovsko podjetje v indeksu NASDAQ.
Supplementary information was submitted by letter from the Icelandic Mission dated 14 May 2004, forwarding a letter by the Icelandic Ministry of Finance dated 13 May 2004.
Islandska misija je z dopisom z dne 14. maja 2004, v katerem je bil posredovan dopis islandskega Ministrstva za finance z dne 13. maja 2004, predložila dodatne informacije.
The letter was received and registered by the Authority on 14 May 2004 (Event No 281472).
Nadzorni organ je dopis prejel in evidentiral 14. maja 2004 (dogodek št. 281472).
Farice hf.’s reply was received by the Authority on 21 October 2004.
oktobra 2004.
The separate competition proceedings have been closed by letter of the Authority dated 2 June 2006 (Event No 1072261).
Ločeni postopki na področju konkurence so se končali z dopisom Nadzornega organa z dne 2. junija 2006 (dogodek št. 1072261).
The Icelandic authorities submitted an overview of several failures of the CANTAT-3 connection during 1995-2003.
Islandski organi so predložili pregled več izpadov delovanja povezave CANTAT-3 v obdobju 1995–2003.
No other single international fibre network project has reached these two countries since 1994, despite a general capacity growth of international and inter-regional telecommunications routes.
Kljub splošnemu povečevanju zmogljivosti mednarodnih in medregionalnih telekomunikacijskih poti ni teh dveh držav od leta 1994 dosegel noben drug mednarodni projekt omrežij iz vlaken. Po informacijah islandskih organov sta to preprečevali geografsko izolirana lokacija obeh držav in omejena velikost trga.
An earlier guarantee of collection was signed in July 2003 in relation to a bridge loan of EUR 16 million. The guarantee of collection covered EUR 6,4 million, i.e. 40 % of that loan.
Prvo jamstvo izterjave je bilo podpisano julija 2003 v zvezi s premostitvenim posojilom v višini 16 milijonov EUR. Jamstvo izterjave je zajemalo 6,4 milijona EUR, tj. 40 % navedenega posojila.
As stated by the Icelandic authorities, the total share capital of Farice hf. was increased from EUR 327000 to more than EUR 14 million. Details on the share capital contribution of the different shareholders can be seen in the table below [19]:Share capital of Farice hf.
Kot so navedli islandski organi, se je skupni delniški kapital družbe Farice hf. povečal s 327000 EUR na več kot 14 milijonov EUR. Podrobnosti o prispevku delniškega kapitala različnih delničarjev so razvidne iz spodnje tabele [19]:Delniški kapital Farice hf.
As to the Icelandic State’s share increase, the Icelandic authorities argued that ‘the initial purpose for the establishment of Farice hf. in September 2002 was solely the preparation for the construction and operation of the submarine communication cable system. At this point, the financial need of the whole project had not been finally decided nor had the final shareholding […]. No company would be in the position to undertake the actual construction and operation of the cable […].
Glede povečanja deleža islandske države so islandski organi menili, da „je bil prvotni namen za ustanovitev Farice hf. v septembru 2002 samo priprava na gradnjo in delovanje podmorskega komunikacijskega kabelskega sistema.
For this reason, the Authority considers that the guarantee of the State covers 100 % of the guaranteed A Term Loan for a maximum amount of EUR 9,4 million. Therefore, the third condition is not fulfilled.
Zato Nadzorni organ meni, da jamstvo države zajema 100 % zajamčenega terminskega posojila A v najvišjem znesku 9,4 milijona EUR. Tretji pogoj torej ni izpolnjen.
The Authority therefore considers that the project should be looked at as being a dedicated facility for undertakings, which is within the scope of State aid control, and not as a general infrastructure [39].
Zato Nadzorni organ meni, da bi bilo treba projekt obravnavati kot namensko zmogljivost za podjetja, ki je okviru nadzora državne pomoči, in ne kot splošno infrastrukturo [39].
In order to determine whether a state measure constitutes aid, it is necessary to establish whether the recipient undertaking receives an economic advantage which it would not have obtained under normal market conditions.
Da bi ugotovili, ali državni ukrep pomeni pomoč, je treba dognati, ali podjetje prejemnik pridobi gospodarsko prednost, ki je pod običajnimi tržnimi pogoji ne bi bilo deležno.
Farice hf. was established in 2002 and the construction work started already in June 2003.
Družba Farice hf. je bila ustanovljena leta 2002, gradbena dela pa so se začela že junija 2003.
The cable was officially opened in February 2004 [43].
Kabel je bil uradno odprt februarja 2004 [43].
The share capital increase took place in January 2003 and the guarantee of collection by the Icelandic authorities dates to 27 February 2004, i.e. before the Authority had a chance to express a view on the notification of the measures on 27 February 2004.
Do povečanja delniškega kapitala je prišlo januarja 2003, jamstvo izterjave s strani islandskih organov pa je z dne 27. februarja 2004, tj. preden je imel Nadzorni organ možnost izraziti mnenje glede priglasitve ukrepov z dne 27. februarja 2004.
Thus, the Icelandic authorities put the measures into effect before the Authority had taken a final decision on it.
Tako so islandski organi uveljavili ukrepe, preden je Nadzorni organ sprejel končno odločitev o tem.
However, even if in the extreme one considered the whole capital increase as State aid and even if one considered the whole A Term Loan as State aid [55], the overall amount of the involvement of the Icelandic State would be some EUR 15,5 million. This is about 32 % of the investment costs for the Farice project [56].
Čeprav bi v skrajnem primeru celotno povečanje kapitala obravnavali kot državno pomoč in bi kot državno pomoč obravnavali celotno terminsko posojilo A [55], bi bil skupni znesek udeležbe islandske države približno 15,5 milijona EUR. To je približno 32 % investicijskih stroškov za projekt Farice [56].
In this regard, the Authority inter alia noted in the decision to open the formal investigation procedure that although the existing infrastructure CANTAT-3 still remains in place [58], there was — among other issues — a concern that in the future, all CANTAT-3 connectivity to Iceland will be channelled through E-Farice hf., which holds the majority of shares in Farice hf.
V zvezi s tem je Nadzorni organ v odločbi o začetku uradnega postopka preiskave med drugim ugotovil, da, čeprav obstoječa infrastruktura CANTAT-3 ostaja nameščena [58], med drugimi vprašanji obstaja tudi pomislek, da bo v prihodnosti celotna povezljivost CANTAT-3 z Islandijo speljana prek E-Farice hf., ki ima večino deležev v Farice hf.
Guidelines on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, adopted and issued by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 19 January 1994 (OJ L 231, 3.9.1994, p. 1, and EEA Supplement No 32 of 3 September 1994).
Smernice o uporabi in razlagi členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma o EGP in člena 1 Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, ki jih je sprejel in izdal Nadzorni organ EFTA 19. januarja 1994, objavljene v UL L 231, 3.9.1994, in Dopolnilu EGP k UL št. 32, 3.9.1994.
The Guidelines were last amended on 29 March 2006.
Smernice so bile nazadnje spremenjene 29. marca 2006.
For the preparation phase it used the 2002 conversion rate of 91,58.
Za pripravljalno fazo je uporabil menjalni tečaj 91,58 iz leta 2002.
For the 2003 figures, it used the 2003 conversion rate of 84,32.
Za vrednosti iz leta 2003 je uporabil menjalni tečaj 84,32 iz leta 2003.
According to Clause 7.4 of the loan agreement, only the margin for the A Term Loan can be modified after signature of the agreement. Such an amendment may take place on 18 March 2011 and will be effective until the loan maturity.
Po klavzuli 7.4 posojilnega sporazuma je po podpisu sporazuma mogoče spreminjati le pribitek za terminsko posojilo A. Do take spremembe lahko pride 18. marca 2011, veljala pa bo do dospelosti posojila.
The Authority is aware of the reference of the Icelandic authorities to the speech of the chairman of Farice hf. board on 24 January 2004.
Nadzorni organ se zaveda sklicevanja islandskih nadzornih organov na govor predsednika uprave Farice hf. dne 24. januarja 2004.
However, this speech only states that there is a ‘modestly profitable business case’ and that the private operators also provided securities.
Vendar pa ta govor le navaja, da gre za „skromno dobičkonosen poslovni primer“ in da so zavarovanja zagotovili tudi zasebni operaterji.
By letter dated 6 May 2004 the Authority addressed a formal request for information to Farice hf.
Z dopisom z dne 6. maja 2004 je Nadzorni organ na Farice hf. naslovil uradni zahtevek za pridobitev informacij [8].
According to the business plan, the estimated total investment costs of the Farice project were EUR 48,9 million.
Po poslovnem načrtu so ocenjeni skupni investicijski stroški projekta Farice znašali 48,9 milijona EUR.
A shareholders’ agreement dated 12 September 2002 provided that the pricing policy of Farice should be based on the principles of cost orientation, transparency and non-discrimination.
V Sporazumu delničarjev z dne 12. septembra 2002 je bilo določeno, da mora politika oblikovanja cen družbe Farice temeljiti na načelih stroškovne naravnanosti, preglednosti in nediskriminacije.
Pursuant to Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, ‘the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall be informed, in sufficient time to enable it to submit its comments, of any plans to grant or alter aid.’
Po členu 1(3) dela I Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču „Nadzorni organ EFTA je treba o kakršnih koli načrtih za dodelitev ali spremembo pomoči obvestiti dovolj zgodaj, da se mu omogoči, da predloži svoje pripombe“.
According to Article 2(1) read together with Article 3 in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, ‘any plans to grant new aid shall be notified to the Authority in sufficient time by the EFTA State concerned and shall not be put into effect before the Authority has taken, or is deemed to have taken, a decision authorising such aid.’
V skladu s členom 2(1), branim skupaj s členom 3 dela II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, „mora zadevna država Efte dovolj zgodaj obvestiti Nadzorni organ o kakršnih koli načrtih za dodelitev nove pomoči, da se mu omogoči, da predloži svoje pripombe, te spremembe pa ne začnejo veljati, preden Nadzorni organ sprejme ali se šteje, da je sprejel, odločbo o odobritvi take pomoči“.
None of the banks would give up its share of the security [22] — in case of a failure of Farice hf.
Nobena banka se ne bi odpovedala svojemu deležu zavarovanja [22] – ob neuspehu Farice hf.
in order to cover any of the other loans.
da bi pokrila katero od drugih posojil.
The Farice project came about from an initiative by the (at the time) almost 100 % state owned Icelandic telecom operator Landssími Íslands hf. (hereinafter Síminn [10]) and the incumbent telecom operator in the Faeroe Islands, Føroya Tele, which were considering the development of a submarine cable linking Reykjavík, Tórshavn and Edinburgh.
(v nadaljnjem besedilu „Síminn“ [10]), ki je bil (takrat) v skoraj 100-odstotni državni lasti, in prvotnega telekomunikacijskega operaterja na Ferskih otokih, Føroya Tele, ki sta razmišljala o razvoju podmorske kabelske povezave med Reykjavíkom, Tórshavnom in Edinburghom.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision
Evropski gospodarski prostor Odločba Nadzornega organa EFTA
No 246/06/COL
št. 246/06/COL
amending the list contained in point 39 in Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement listing border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway agreed for veterinary checks on live animals and animal products from third countries and repealing EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision 86/02/COL of 24 May 2002
o spremembi seznama iz točke 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP, ki navaja mejne kontrolne točke na Islandiji in na Norveškem, dogovorjene za veterinarske preglede živih živali in živalskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav, in o razveljavitvi Odločbe Nadzornega organa EFTA 86/02/COL z dne 24. maja 2002
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [1], in particular Article 109 and Protocol 1 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [1] ter zlasti člena 109 in Protokola 1 k Sporazumu,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice [2], in particular Article 5(2)(d) and Protocol 1 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča [2] in zlasti člena 5(2)(d) in Protokola 1 k Sporazumu,
HAVING REGARD to points 4(B)(1) and (3) and point (5)(b) of the Introductory Part of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU točk 4(B)(1) in (3) ter točke (5)(b) uvodnega dela poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP,
HAVING REGARD to the Act referred to at point 1.1.4 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [3]), as amended and adapted to the EEA Agreement by the sectorial adaptations referred to in Annex I to that Agreement, and in particular to Article 6(2) thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU akta iz točke 1.1.4 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [3]), kakor je bila spremenjena in prilagojena Sporazumu EGP s sektorskimi prilagoditvami iz Priloge I k navedenemu sporazumu, in zlasti člena 6(2) akta,
HAVING REGARD to the Act referred to at point 1.1.5 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC [4]), as amended and adapted to the EEA Agreement by the sectorial adaptations referred to in Annex I to that Agreement, and in particular to Article 6(4) thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU akta iz točke 1.1.5 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 91/496/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o določitvi načel o organizaciji veterinarskih pregledov živali, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav, in o spremembi direktiv 89/662/EGS, 90/425/EGS ter 90/675/EGS [4]), kakor je bila spremenjena in prilagojena Sporazumu EGP s sektorskimi prilagoditvami iz Priloge I k navedenemu sporazumu, in zlasti člena 6(4) akta,
HAVING REGARD to the Act referred to at point 1.2.111 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Commission Decision 2001/812/EC of 21 November 2001 laying down the requirements for the approval of border inspection posts responsible for veterinary checks on products introduced into the Community from third countries [5]), as amended, and in particular to Article 3(5) thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU akta iz točke 1.2.111 poglavja I Priloge I Sporazumu EGP (Odločba Komisije 2001/812/ES z dne 21. novembra 2001 o zahtevah za odobritev mejnih kontrolnih točk, odgovornih za veterinarske preglede proizvodov, ki so vneseni v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [5]), kakor je bila spremenjena, in zlasti člena 3(5) akta,
WHEREAS the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 325/99/COL of 16 December 1999 drew up a list of border inspection posts (BIP) in Iceland and Norway approved for veterinary checks on products and animals from third countries,
KER je Nadzorni organ EFTA z Odločbo št. 352/99/COL z dne 16. decembra 1999 sestavil seznam mejnih kontrolnih točk (MKT) na Islandiji ter na Norveškem, dogovorjenih za veterinarske preglede proizvodov in živali iz tretjih držav,
WHEREAS the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 86/02/COL of 24 May 2002 repealed the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 325/99/COL of 16 December 1999 and drew up a new list of border inspections posts in Iceland and Norway approved for veterinary checks on live animal and animal products from third countries,
KER je Nadzorni organ EFTA z Odločbo št. 86/02/COL z dne 24. maja 2002 razveljavil Odločbo Nadzornega organa EFTA št. 325/99/COL z dne 16. decembra in sestavil nov seznam mejnih kontrolnih točk na Islandiji ter na Norveškem, dogovorjenih za veterinarske preglede živih živali in živalskih proizvodov, vnesenih v Skupnost iz tretjih držav,
WHEREAS the Government of Iceland has requested that the border inspection posts in Eskifjörður, Njarðvík, and Siglufjörður be withdrawn from the list contained in point 39 in Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement,
KER je islandska vlada zahtevala, da se mejne kontrolne točke v krajih Eskifjörður, Njarðvík in Siglufjörður umaknejo s seznama iz točke 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP,
WHEREAS the Government of Norway has requested that the border inspection posts in Stavanger and Trondheim and the inspection centres in Alta and Leirvika (under BIP Hammerfest), Bud (under BIP Kristiansund), Dåfjord and Lenangen (under BIP Tromsø), Svartnes (under BIP Vadsø) and Gangstøvika (under BIP Ålesund) be withdrawn from the list contained in point 39 in Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement,
KER je norveška vlada zahtevala, da se mejni kontrolni točki v krajih Stavanger in Trondheim ter kontrolna središča v krajih Alta in Leirvika (v okviru MKT Hammerfest), Bud (v okviru MKT Kristiansund), Dåfjord in Lenangen (v okviru MKT Tromsø), Svartnes (v okviru MKT Vadsø) ter Gangstøvika (v okviru MKT Ålesund) umaknejo s seznama iz točke 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP,
WHEREAS footnote 20 of the Annex to Decision No 86/02/COL contained in point 39 in Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement reads ‘Fish meal (including fish feed) only’,
KER se opomba 20 iz Priloge k Odločbi št. 86/02/COL, ki je vključena v točko 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP, glasi „Samo ribja moka (vključno s hrano za ribe)“,
WHEREAS the numbering of the footnotes has been updated, and at the request of the Government of Iceland and the Government of Norway footnote 16 of the Annex to this Decision shall only include a general reference to fish meal, and thus read ‘Fish meal only’,
KER je bilo oštevilčenje opomb posodobljeno in se opomba 16 Priloge k tej odločbi na zahtevo islandske vlade in norveške vlade nanaša le splošno na ribjo moko ter se torej glasi „Samo ribja moka“,
WHEREAS the EFTA Surveillance Authority by its Decision 05/06/COL referred the matter to the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority,
KER je Nadzorni organ EFTA s svojo Odločbo 05/06/COL predložil zadevo Veterinarskemu odboru Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu EFTA
WHEREAS the draft decision referred to the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority contained proposals to add a new inspection centre in Norway and new additions to the categorisation of certain border inspections ports and inspection centres in Norway and Iceland,
KER je osnutek odločbe, predložene Veterinarskemu odboru Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu EFTA, vseboval predloge, da se doda novo kontrolno središče na Norveškem in novi dodatki h kategorizaciji nekaterih mejnih kontrolnih točk in kontrolnih središč na Norveškem ter na Islandiji,
WHEREAS, in agreement with the European Commission and following discussions with the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority, it has been considered necessary not to include in the final decision the proposals, which were included in the draft decision, to add a new inspection centre in Norway and new additions to the categorisation of certain border inspections ports and inspection centres in Norway and Iceland, in order to ensure a correct application of point 4(B)(3) and point 5 of the Introductory Part of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement,
KER, se v soglasju z Evropsko komisijo in po razpravah z Veterinarskim odborom Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu EFTA, zdi nujno, da se predlogi iz osnutka Odločbe, naj se doda novo kontrolno središče na Norveškem in novi dodatki h kategorizaciji nekaterih mejnih kontrolnih točk in kontrolnih središč na Norveškem ter na Islandiji, ne vključijo v končno odločbo, da bi se s tem zagotovila pravilna uporaba točke 4(B)(3) in točke 5 uvodnega dela poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP –
Veterinary checks on live animals and animal products brought into Iceland and Norway from third countries shall be carried out by the competent national authorities at the agreed border inspections posts listed in the Annex to this Decision.
Veterinarske preglede živih živali in živalskih proizvodov, vnesenih na Islandijo in Norveško iz tretjih držav, opravljajo pristojni državni organi na dogovorjenih mejnih kontrolnih točkah, ki so navedene v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 86/02/COL of 24 May 2002 updating the adaptation text to point 39 in Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement listing border inspection posts in Iceland and Norway agreed for veterinary checks on live animals and animal products from third countries and repealing EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision 325/99/COL of 16 December 1999 [6], is hereby repealed.
Odločba Nadzornega organa EFTA št. 86/02/COL z dne 24. maja 2002 o posodobitvi prilagoditvenega besedila točke 39 dela 1.2 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP, ki navaja seznam mejnih kontrolnih točk na Islandiji in na Norveškem, dogovorjenih za veterinarske preglede živih živali in živalskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav, in o razveljavitvi Odločbe Nadzornega organa EFTA 325/99/COL z dne 16. decembra 1999 [6], se razveljavi.
This Decision shall enter into force on 6 September 2006.
Ta odločba začne veljati 6. septembra 2006.
This Decision is addressed to Iceland and Norway.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Islandijo in Norveško.
Done at Brussels, 6 September 2006.
V Bruslju, 6. septembra 2006.
OJ L 69, 13.3.2003, p. 31.
UL L 69, 13.3.2003, str. 31.
LIST OF AGREED BORDER INSPECTION POSTS
SEZNAM DOGOVORJENIH MEJNIH KONTROLNIH TOČK
2 Animo Code
2 Koda Animo
A Airport
A Letališče
P Port
P Pristanišče
4 Inspection centre
4 Kontrolno središče
HC All products for Human Consumption
HC Vsi proizvodi za prehrano ljudi
NHC Other Products
NHC Drugi proizvodi
NT No temperature requirements
NT Nobenih temperaturnih zahtev
T Frozen/chilled products
T Zamrznjeni/ohlajeni proizvodi
T(FR) Frozen products
T(FR) Zamrznjeni proizvodi
T(CH) Chilled products
T(CH) Ohlajeni proizvodi
6 Live Animals
6 Žive živali
U Ungulates: cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, wild and domestic solipeds
U Kopitarji: govedo, prašiči, ovce, koze, divji in domači enokopitarji
E Registered equidae as defined in Council Directive 90/426/EEC
E Registrirani kopitarji, kakor so opredeljeni v Direktivi Sveta 90/426/EGS
O Other animals
O Druge živali
5-6 Special remarks
5–6 Posebne opombe
Checking in line with the requirements of Commission Decision 93/352/EEC taken in execution of Article 19(3) of Council Directive 97/78/EC
Preverjanje v skladu z zahtevami Odločbe Komisije 93/352/EGS z namenom izvrševanja člena 19(3) Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES
Packed products only
Samo pakirani proizvodi
Fishery products only
Samo ribiški proizvodi