natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Acknowledges the introduction of a 65 % threshold as the necessary score a candidate has to obtain in order to be invited to an interview; calls on the Agency to take into account the situation where one or more candidates have scored the same amount of points; asks the Agency to lay down a clear policy to declare the eligibility of the candidates and to specify the minimum and maximum number of candidates who will be invited to the interview in accordance with objective and transparent criteria; urges the Agency to adopt those internal rules until the end of September 2015 and to inform the discharge authority of the follow-up results;
je seznanjen z uvedbo 65-odstotnega praga, ki ga mora doseči kandidat, da je povabljen na razgovor; poziva agencijo, naj upošteva možnost, da eden ali več kandidatov dobi enako število točk, in jo poziva, naj v skladu z nepristranskimi in preglednimi merili določi jasno politiko za določanje upravičenosti kandidatov, ki bodo povabljeni na razgovor, ter njihovo najmanjše in največje število; poziva agencijo, naj ta notranja pravila sprejme do konca septembra 2015 in organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o rezultatih nadaljnjih ukrepov;
Expresses concern about the Appointing Authority's discretionary powers to oblige a successful candidate to sit a second interview; calls on the Agency to publish the criteria used by the Appointing Authority, which must be clear and comprehensive, for justifying the organisation of a second interview and the official appointment of a candidate on the reserve list to the post;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi diskrecijskih pooblastil organa za imenovanje, da od uspešnega kandidata zahteva, da se udeleži drugega razgovora; poziva agencijo, naj objavi jasna in celovita merila, ki jih organ za imenovanje uporablja pri odločanju, ali bo organiziral drugi razgovor, in pri uradnem imenovanju kandidata z rezervnega seznama na delovno mesto;
Acknowledges that in 2013, the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) carried out an audit in accordance with its Strategic Audit Plan for 2013-2015; notes furthermore that the IAS carried out an operational risk assessment which resulted in the IAS Strategic Internal Audit Plan for the Agency, listing the proposed audit topics for 2014-2016;
je seznanjen, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo leta 2013 opravila revizijsko delo v skladu s svojim strateškim revizijskim načrtom za obdobje 2013–2015; ugotavlja še, da je izvedla tudi oceno operativnega tveganja, na podlagi katere je pripravila strateški načrt notranje revizije za agencijo, ki vsebuje seznam predlaganih revizijskih tem za obdobje 2014–2016;
Observes that in the course of the risk analysis, the IAS identified certain processes of high inherent risk which could not be considered as auditable within the audit plan, as the controls were assessed as absent or insufficient;
ugotavlja, da je služba za notranjo revizijo med analizo tveganja opredelila nekatere postopke z velikim pripadajočim tveganjem, ki jih ni mogoče revidirati v okviru revizijskega načrta, saj so bile kontrole ocenjene kot neobstoječe ali nezadostne;
Takes note that the IAS performed a follow-up desk review on the implementation of its previous recommendations; notes that neither ‘Very important’ nor ‘Critical’ recommendations were open as of 31 December 2013;
je seznanjen, da je služba za notranjo revizijo pregledala dokumentacijo o izvajanju svojih prejšnjih priporočil; ugotavlja, da 31. decembra 2013 ni bilo nerešenih kritičnih oziroma zelo pomembnih priporočil;
Acknowledges that in 2013 the IAS carried out an audit on Human Resources Management in the Agency; takes note that it covered the key areas of human resources management, with focus on recruitment, staff appraisal and development, supervision and control as well as on planning and resource allocation; ascertains from the IAS that the management and control system in place at the Agency provides reasonable assurance concerning compliance with the applicable legal framework and internal procedures;
ugotavlja, da je služba za notranjo revizijo leta 2013 revidirala upravljanje človeških virov v agenciji; je seznanjen, da je pri tem zajela ključna kadrovska področja, s poudarkom na zaposlovanju, ocenjevanju in razvoju uslužbencev, nadzoru in kontroli ter načrtovanju in dodeljevanju virov; je seznanjen z ugotovitvami službe za notranjo revizijo, da sistem upravljanja in kontrole v agenciji daje zadostno zagotovilo za skladnost z veljavnim pravnim okvirom in notranjimi postopki;
Welcomes the measures taken by the Agency with regard to visibility and encourages it to continue to apply those good practices;
pozdravlja dobre ukrepe, ki jih je agencija sprejela v zvezi s prepoznavnostjo; spodbuja jo, naj to dobro prakso nadaljuje;
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
ob upoštevanju člena 94 in Priloge V Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
Pravni okvir
Internal control systems
poudarja, da je 31. decembra 2013 program skupnega podjetja sestavljalo 130 sporazumov o nepovratnih sredstvih, ki so posledica petih letnih razpisov iz obdobja 2008–2012; opozarja, da ta nepovratna sredstva skupaj znašajo 365 milijonov EUR, kar predstavlja 81 % najvišjega prispevka Unije za skupno podjetje za raziskovalne dejavnosti, ki sicer znaša 452,5 milijona EUR;
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines for the financial year 2013
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja za izvajanje skupne tehnološke pobude za inovativna zdravila za proračunsko leto 2013
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines for the financial year 2013,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja za izvajanje skupne tehnološke pobude za inovativna zdravila za proračunsko leto 2013,
A. whereas the Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines (‘the Joint Undertaking’) was set up in December 2007 for a period of 10 years to significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the drug development process with the long-term aim that the pharmaceutical sector produces more effective and safer innovative medicines,
A. ker je bilo Skupno podjetje za izvajanje skupne tehnološke pobude za inovativna zdravila (v nadaljevanju: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno decembra 2007 za obdobje 10 let z namenom znatno izboljšati smotrnost in uspešnost razvoja zdravil, kot dolgoročni cilj pa naj bi farmacevtski sektor proizvedel več učinkovitejših in varnejših inovativnih zdravil;
B. whereas the Union, represented by the Commission, and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), are the Joint Undertaking's founding members,
B. ker sta ustanoviteljici skupnega podjetja Unija, ki jo zastopa Komisija, in Evropska federacija farmacevtske industrije in združenj (EFPIA);
C. whereas the Joint Undertaking started to work autonomously on 16 November 2009,
C. ker je skupno podjetje začelo samostojno delovati 16. novembra 2009;
D. whereas the maximum contribution for the period of 10 years from the Union to the Joint Undertaking is EUR 1000000000, to be paid from the budget of the seventh research framework programme and the founding members are to contribute equally to the running costs, each with an amount not exceeding 4 % of the total Union contribution and to the research activities with in-kind contributions at least equal to the financial contribution of the Union,
D. ker lahko prispevek Unije za skupno podjetje, ki bo izplačan iz proračuna sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave, v desetletnem obdobju znaša največ 1000000000 EUR in ker morata ustanoviteljici enakomerno prispevati k tekočim stroškom, pri čemer znesek, ki ga krije vsaka od njiju, ne sme preseči 4 % celotnega prispevka Unije, prispevek k raziskovalnim dejavnostim v naravi pa mora biti vsaj enak finančnemu prispevku Unije;
Notes that in the opinion of the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’), the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2013 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission's accounting officer;
ugotavlja, da po mnenju Računskega sodišča letni računovodski izkazi skupnega podjetja v vseh pomembnih pogledih pošteno predstavljajo njegov finančni položaj na dan 31. decembra 2013 ter njegov poslovni izid in denarne tokove za tedaj končano leto v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil in računovodskimi pravili, ki jih je sprejel računovodja Komisije;
Takes note that the Joint Undertaking's ex post audit strategy was adopted by a Governing Board decision on 14 December 2010, and that it is considered as a key tool for assessing the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions;
ugotavlja tudi, da je upravni odbor skupnega podjetja s sklepom z dne 14. decembra 2010 sprejel strategijo naknadnih revizij, ki velja za ključno orodje za ocenjevanje zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij;
Notes with concern that 14 out of 40 ex post audits of the second representative sample were finalised as of June 2014, covering EUR 3000000 and representing 11,8 % of the audited population; points out that the detected error rate resulting from these audits is 2,3 %; reminds that the error rate resulting from the 56 concluded audits of the first representative sample in 2012 was at 5,82 %;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je bilo junija 2014 končanih 14 od 40 naknadnih revizij drugega reprezentativnega vzorca, v katere so bili zajeti 3000000 EUR (11,8 % revidirane populacije); opozarja, da stopnja napake, ugotovljena pri teh revizijah, znaša 2,3 %; spominja, da je stopnja napake, ugotovljena pri 56 zaključenih revizijah prvega reprezentativnega vzorca v letu 2012, znašala 5,82 %;
Notes with concern that the Court, in its report on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013 (‘the Court's report’), issued a qualified opinion on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts of the Joint Undertaking on the basis of the detected error rate being above the materiality threshold of 2 %; notes with concern that the Court issued a qualified opinion for a third consecutive year;
je zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče v poročilu o zaključnem računu skupnega podjetja za proračunsko leto 2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: poročilo Računskega sodišča) izdalo mnenje s pridržkom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij, saj je ugotovljena stopnja napake presegala prag pomembnosti, ki znaša 2 %; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče mnenje s pridržkom izdalo že tretje leto zapored;
Calls on the Joint Undertaking for a follow-up report on the reservations of the Joint Undertaking in the last 3 years;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj pripravi spremljevalno poročilo o rezervacijah skupnega podjetja v zadnjih treh letih;
Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the follow-up actions related to audited beneficiaries with detected errors were launched and that all detected errors were communicated to these beneficiaries; notes furthermore that in order to mitigate the risk of future errors in beneficiaries' cost claims, the Joint Undertaking has taken specific measures, such as establishing financial workshops for beneficiaries as well as the regular updating of its Financial Guidelines for participants;
je seznanjen s pojasnilom skupnega podjetja, da je uvedlo ukrepe v zvezi z revidiranimi upravičenci, pri katerih so bile ugotovljene napake, in da so bili ti o odkritih napakah obveščeni; ugotavlja tudi, da je skupno podjetje uvedlo posebne ukrepe, da bi v prihodnje omejilo tveganje napak v zahtevkih upravičencev za povračilo stroškov, na primer organiziralo je finančne delavnice za upravičence in poskrbelo za redno posodabljanje finančnih smernic za udeležence;
Asks for an action plan with clear objectives aimed at fixing the deficiencies and errors identified by the Court to be submitted to the discharge authority in a timely manner, to be followed by a first interim evaluation report on the implementation of the action plan;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice pravočasno predloži akcijski načrt z jasnimi cilji za odpravo pomanjkljivosti in napak, ki jih je ugotovilo Računsko sodišče, nato pa še prvo vmesno poročilo o izvajanju tega akcijskega načrta;
Notes from the Court's report that the initial 2013 budget included EUR 226000000 in commitment appropriations and EUR 135000000 in payment appropriations; notes furthermore that at the year-end, an amended budget was adopted by the Governing Board which increased commitment appropriations to EUR 255700000 and decreased payment appropriations to EUR 130600000; takes note that after the budget was amended, the overall implementation rate was 99,5 % for commitment appropriations and 97,5 % for payment appropriations; ascertains from the Court's report that the implementation rate of commitment and payment appropriations in the case of operational activities was 100 % and 99 % respectively;
je seznanjen z navedbo iz poročila Računskega sodišča, da je prvotni proračun za leto 2013 vseboval 226000000 EUR sredstev za obveznosti in 135000000 EUR sredstev za plačila; ugotavlja, da je upravni odbor konec leta sprejel spremembo proračuna, s katero so se sredstva za obveznosti povečala na 255700000 EUR, sredstva za plačila pa zmanjšala na 130600000 EUR; ugotavlja še, da je po spremembi proračuna skupna stopnja izvrševanja znašala 99,5 % za obveznosti in 97,5 % za plačila; je seznanjen tudi z navedbo v poročilu Računskega sodišča, da je stopnja izvrševanja pri operativnih dejavnostih znašala 100 % za obveznosti in 99 % za plačila;
Calls on the Joint Undertaking to provide the discharge authority with detailed information on the in-kind contributions of EFPIA companies especially on the type of the in-kind contributions and their respective value;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice posreduje podrobne informacije o prispevkih podjetij EFPIA v naravi, zlasti o vrsti in vrednosti teh prispevkov;
Calls on the Joint Undertaking to submit a report to the discharge authority concerning the contributions of all members other than the Commission including the application of the methodology for evaluating in-kind contributions, together with an assessment by the Commission;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice posreduje poročilo o prispevkih vseh članov razen Komisije, vključno z uporabo metodologije za vrednotenje prispevkov v naravi, priloži pa naj tudi oceno Komisije;
Calls on the Court to present a complete and appropriate financial assessment of rights and obligations of the Joint Undertaking for the period up to the date of the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking starting activity;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj predloži popolno in ustrezno finančno oceno pravic in obveznosti skupnega podjetja za obdobje do datuma, ko je začelo poslovati Skupno podjetje za pobudo za inovativna zdravila 2;
Takes into consideration that under the seventh framework programme (FP7) [1], 2013 was the last year in which calls for proposals could be launched; notes that the entire budget for research of EUR 970000000 was committed along with the requisite matching in-kind contributions from the EFPIA companies in the amount of EUR 982000000;
je seznanjen, da je bilo leto 2013 v sedmem okvirnem programu [1] zadnje leto, ko je bilo mogoče začeti razpise za zbiranje predlogov; ugotavlja, da so bile prevzete obveznosti v znesku 970000000 EUR, kar je celotni proračun za raziskave, in da so podjetja EFPIA prispevala zahtevane prispevke v naravi v vrednosti 982000000 EUR;
Legal Framework
Zakonodajni okvir
Takes into consideration that the new Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the Union was adopted on 25 October 2012 and took effect on 1 January 2013 while the model financial regulation for public-private partnership bodies referred to in Article 209 of the new Financial Regulation did not enter into force until 8 February 2014; acknowledges that the Financial Rules of the Joint Undertaking have been amended to take into account the model financial regulation in July 2014;
upošteva, da je bila nova finančna uredba, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Unije, sprejeta 25. oktobra 2012 in je začela veljati 1. januarja 2013, vendar pa je vzorčna finančna uredba za subjekte javno-zasebnega partnerstva iz člena 209 nove finančne uredbe začela veljati šele 8. februarja 2014; je seznanjen, da so bila finančna pravila skupnega podjetja z vzorčno finančno uredbo usklajena julija 2014;
Notes the Joint Statement by the Parliament, the Council and the Commission [2] and the subsequent political agreement reached on the separate discharge to be given by the Parliament upon recommendation of the Council, for Joint Undertakings under Article 209 of the Financial Regulation;
je seznanjen s skupno izjavo Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije [2] ter posledičnim političnim dogovorom o posebni razrešnici, ki jo Parlament v skladu s členom 209 finančne uredbe na priporočilo Sveta podeli skupnim podjetjem;
Notes that in accordance with the strategic audit plan for 2012-2014 approved by the Joint Undertaking's Governing Board on 3 November 2011, the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) performed an assurance engagement of project management and reporting on operational performance; points out that the final report which was dated 30 January 2014 includes recommendations regarding the Joint Undertaking's process of improving its monitoring systems on operational performance, such as reviewing the design and reporting of objectives and key performance indicators (‘KPIs’), strengthening of the project monitoring and improving the IT systems to enhance reporting;
ugotavlja, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo v skladu s strateškim revizijskim načrtom za obdobje 2012–2014, ki ga je 3. novembra 2011 odobril upravni odbor, dala zagotovilo v zvezi z upravljanjem projektov in poročanjem o operativni smotrnosti; poudarja, da končno poročilo z dne 30. januarja 2014 vsebuje priporočila skupnemu podjetju glede izboljšav sistema spremljanja operativne smotrnosti poslovanja, na primer naj pregleda zasnovo ciljev in ključnih kazalnikov uspešnosti ter poročanje o njih, izpopolni spremljanje projektov in nadgradi sisteme IT, da bi izboljšalo poročanje;
Acknowledges that the IAS also performed an IT risk assessment of the Joint Undertaking's specific IT systems as well as the common infrastructure it shares with the FCH, Clean Sky, ENIAC and Artemis Joint Undertakings; points out that in the case of the Joint Undertaking's specific IT systems, the IAS reports the need for more formal instructions on project management and on change control processes in the contracts in order to mitigate contract-management risk; notes from the Court's report that this recommendation was implemented in January 2014;
ugotavlja, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo opravila oceno tveganja za posebne sisteme IT skupnega podjetja, pa tudi za skupno infrastrukturo, ki si jo deli s skupnimi podjetji GVC, Čisto nebo, ENIAC in ARTEMIS; poudarja, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo v zvezi s posebnimi sistemi IT skupnega podjetja opozorila, da so potrebna bolj formalna navodila za upravljanje projektov in za postopke za kontrolo sprememb v pogodbah, da bi se ublažila tveganja, povezana z upravljanjem pogodb; je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo v poročilu Računskega sodišča, da je bilo to priporočilo uresničeno januarja 2014;
Takes note that procedures regarding the protection, dissemination and transfer of research results in relation to Article 7 of the FP7 have been developed by the Joint Undertaking; notes moreover that the Joint Undertaking defined the requirements regarding the general monitoring report of FP7, as well as transferring the data related to its projects to the Commission during 2013, in order for the data to be integrated in the Common Research Data Warehouse; is concerned, however, that the monitoring processes put in place require further development in order to fully comply with the required provisions;
je seznanjen, da je skupno podjetje oblikovalo postopke za zaščito, širjenje in prenos rezultatov raziskav v zvezi s členom 7 sedmega okvirnega programa; prav tako ugotavlja, da je opredelilo zahteve glede splošnega poročila o spremljanju sedmega okvirnega programa, pa tudi glede prenosa podatkov o svojih projektih Komisiji v letu 2013, da bi se ti podatki vključili v skupno skladišče raziskovalnih podatkov; je vseeno zaskrbljen, saj bi bilo treba obstoječe postopke spremljanja nadalje izpopolnjevati, da bodo povsem skladni z ustreznimi določbami;
Takes note that in order to prevent conflicts of interest in respect to its Governing Board members, experts and employees, the Joint Undertaking has put in place specific measures which are included in the rules of procedure of both the Governing Board and the Scientific Committee, as well as in the documentation on the code of conduct and conflicts of interest in the case of independent experts during evaluation; notes furthermore that the Joint Undertaking has adopted an updated and comprehensive policy on conflicts of interest for both management and staff members in April 2013;
ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje uvedlo posebne ukrepe, ki jih je vključilo v poslovnika upravnega in znanstvenega odbora, pa tudi v dokumentacijo o kodeksu ravnanja in navzkrižju interesov neodvisnih strokovnjakov med vrednotenjem, da bi preprečilo navzkrižje interesov članov upravnega odbora, strokovnjakov in zaposlenih; ugotavlja še, da je skupno podjetje aprila 2013 sprejelo posodobljeno in celovito politiko o navzkrižju interesov za vodstvo in uslužbence;
Acknowledges that between March and July 2013, the Commission's Second Interim Evaluation was carried out in order to assess the Joint Undertaking in terms of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and research policy and that the report on the evaluation was issued on 31 July 2013;
je seznanjen, da je Komisija v obdobju od marca do julija 2013 opravila drugo vmesno vrednotenje skupnega podjetja, da bi ocenila ustreznost, uspešnost, učinkovitost in politiko raziskav, 31. julija 2013 pa je objavila poročilo o tem vrednotenju;
Points out that the report highlights the areas where improvements can be made; takes note however that the report considers the Joint Undertaking a success in achieving its objectives; notes in particular that as regards the Joint Undertaking's communication strategy, there is a need to develop additional KPIs which should help demonstrate its impact and socioeconomic benefits, the optimisation of the organisational structure and a more flexible funding mechanism in a quantitative manner;
poudarja, da so v poročilu navedena področja, kjer so mogoče izboljšave; kljub temu ugotavlja, da je bilo v skladu s poročilom skupno podjetje uspešno pri doseganju svojih ciljev; še zlasti ugotavlja, da bi moralo skupno podjetje v zvezi s svojo komunikacijsko strategijo oblikovati dodatne kazalnike uspešnosti, ki bodo količinsko prikazali njegov učinek in družbeno-gospodarske koristi, optimizacijo organizacijske sestave in prilagodljivejše mehanizme financiranja;