natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Observes from the Institute's annual activity report that its Internal Audit Function (IAF) resigned as of 31 December 2012 and the recruitment of the new Institute's Internal Auditor took longer than expected, as the vacancy notice had to be republished owing to an insufficient number of suitable applicants; takes note that the new Internal Auditor started on 1 January 2014 and therefore, no IAF audits were carried out in 2013;
na podlagi letnega poročila o dejavnostih inštituta se seznanja z odstopom s funkcije notranje revizije z 31. decembrom 2012 in z dejstvom, da je bilo za zaposlitev novega notranjega revizorja potrebno več časa, kot je bilo predvideno, saj je bilo treba razpis delovnega mesta objaviti večkrat zaradi premajhnega števila primernih kandidatov; je seznanjen, da je novi notranji revizor začel z delom 1. januarja 2014 in da v letu 2013 funkcija notranje revizije ni opravila nobene revizije;
Acknowledges from the Institute that in order to bridge the period between the departure of the former Internal Auditor and the arrival of the new one, it decided to set up an Audit Committee of the Governing Board which provides support to the Governing Board in increasing the quality of the follow-up and implementation of the audit recommendations, for which the Institute's Director bears sole responsibility;
na podlagi navedb inštituta ugotavlja, da se je ta za premostitev obdobja po odhodu prejšnjega notranjega revizorja in pred prihodom novega odločil vzpostaviti revizijski odbor upravnega odbora, ki slednjemu zagotavlja podporo pri povečevanju kakovosti nadaljnjih ukrepov in izvajanja priporočil revizije, za katere je izključno odgovoren direktor inštituta;
Notes that in 2014, the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) followed up the status of implementation of the accepted recommendations from the ‘Limited Review on Grant Management — Preparation of Annual Grant Agreements’ in the Institute; notes moreover that this limited review resulted in six recommendations, of which one marked as ‘Critical’ and four as ‘Very Important’, and that the Institute responded to the six recommendations by a detailed action plan comprising 25 actions, amongst which 13 were due by 31 August 2013 or before and 10 were reported as ‘Ready For Review’ by this date;
ugotavlja, da je služba za notranjo revizijo Komisije v letu 2014 spremljala, kako inštitut izvaja sprejeta priporočila iz omejenega pregleda upravljanja nepovratnih sredstev – priprava letnih sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev; poleg tega opaža, da je ta omejeni pregled privedel do šestih priporočil, od katerih je bilo eno označeno s „kritično“, štiri pa z „zelo pomembno“, na ta priporočila se je inštitut odzval s pripravo podrobnega akcijskega načrta, ki je vključeval 25 ukrepov, od katerih bi jih 13 moralo biti sprejetih do 31. avgusta 2013 ali prej, 10 pa je bilo do tega datuma označenih s „pripravljeno na pregled“;
Regrets the fact that when the IAS performed a desk review of the status of implementation of these 10 actions, it concluded on 24 September 2013 that either the degree of implementation was insufficient or that additional on-the-spot checks were necessary to confirm the implementation in practice; takes note of the fact that the Institute subsequently reformulated some of the actions and revised the related deadlines to address the IAS remarks;
obžaluje, da je služba za notranjo revizijo opravila pregled dokumentacije o stanju izvajanja teh desetih ukrepov in 24. septembra 2013 prišla do slepa, da bodisi je stopnja izvajanja nezadostna bodisi so potrebna dodatna preverjanja na kraju samem, da bi bilo mogoče potrditi izvajanje v praksi; je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je inštitut posledično preoblikoval nekatere ukrepe in revidiral z njimi povezane roke, da bi upošteval pripombe službe za notranjo revizijo;
Is concerned about the IAS conclusions in its follow-up report which emphasises the risk that the Institute would not be able to fully implement all actions in time, in particular those actions scheduled for completion in the second quarter of 2014; finds the delays unacceptable given that the IAS considers that delays in the implementation would lead to an even increased risk for the organisation;
je zaskrbljen zaradi sklepov iz nadaljnjega poročila službe za notranjo revizijo, v katerem je poudarjeno tveganje, da inštitut ne bo zmogel pravočasno in v celoti izvesti vseh ukrepov, zlasti tistih, katerih dokončanje je načrtovano v drugem četrtletju 2014; meni, da so te zamude pri izvajanju nesprejemljive, saj bi po mnenju službe za notranjo revizijo utegnile privesti do še večjega tveganja za organizacijo;
Acknowledges the Institute's commitment to monitor the ex ante verifications in order to obtain reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of grant transactions;
je seznanjen z zavezo inštituta, da bo spremljal predhodno preverjanje, da bi pridobil razumno zagotovilo o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, povezanih z nepovratnimi sredstvi;
Calls on the Institute to provide the discharge authority with a detailed report on the implementation of the IAS' recommendations as well as on actions taken regarding the recommendations by the Institute's IAF by 1 September 2015;
poziva inštitut, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice zagotovi podrobno poročilo o izvedbi priporočil službe za notranjo revizijo in o ukrepih, sprejetih glede priporočil funkcije notranje revizije do 1. septembra 2015;
Texts adopted of that date, P8_TA(2015)0130 (see page 431 of this Official Journal).
Sprejeta besedila, P8_TA(2015)0130 (glej stran 431 tega Uradnega lista).
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja Artemis za proračunsko leto 2013
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Artemis Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja Artemis za proračunsko leto 2013,
A. whereas the Artemis Joint Undertaking (‘the Joint Undertaking’) was set up in December 2007 for a period of 10 years to define and implement a ‘Research Agenda’ for the development of key technologies for embedded computing systems across different application areas in order to strengthen Union competitiveness and sustainability and to allow for the emergence of new markets and societal applications,
A. ker je bilo Skupno podjetje Artemis (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno decembra 2007 za obdobje 10 let z namenom opredeliti in izvesti raziskovalni program za razvoj ključnih tehnologij za vgrajene računalniške sisteme na različnih področjih uporabe, da bi izboljšali evropsko konkurenčnost in trajnostnost ter omogočili oblikovanje novih trgov in družbenih aplikacij;
B. whereas the Joint Undertaking started to work autonomously in October 2009,
B. ker je začelo skupno podjetje samostojno delovati oktobra 2009;
C. whereas the maximum contribution for the period of 10 years from the Union to the Joint Undertaking is EUR 420000000 to be paid from the budget of the Seventh Research Framework Programme,
C. ker je najvišji prispevek Unije za skupno podjetje v obdobju desetih let 420000000 EUR, izplača pa se iz proračuna sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave;
D. whereas financial contributions from Artemis Member States should amount in total to at least 1,8 times the Union's financial contribution and the in-kind contribution of research and development organisations participating in projects over the duration of the Joint Undertaking shall be equal to or greater than the contribution of public authorities.
D. ker bi morali prispevki držav članic, ki sodelujejo v podjetju Artemis, skupaj znašati najmanj 1,8-krat toliko kot finančni prispevek Unije, prispevki v naravi organizacij za raziskave in razvoj, ki sodelujejo v projektih, pa bi morali biti v obdobju delovanja skupnega podjetja enaki ali večji kot prispevki javnih organov;
E. whereas the Artemis and ENIAC Joint Undertakings were merged to create the Electronic Components and Systems for European leadership Joint Technology Initiative (ECSEL JTI) which has started its activity in June 2014 and will run for 10 years,
E. ker sta bili skupni podjetji ENIAC in Artemis združeni zaradi ustanovitve skupne tehnološke pobude za elektronske komponente in sisteme za evropski vodilni položaj (ECSEL), ki je začela delovati junija 2014 in se bo izvajala deset let;
F. whereas the Court of Auditors' report for the financial year 2013 has been produced on a going-concern principle,
F. ker je bilo poročilo Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2013 pripravljeno v skladu z načelom delujočega podjetja;
Notes that the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’) stated that the 2013 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2013 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year-end, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Rules;
ugotavlja, da po mnenju Računskega sodišča letni računovodski izkazi skupnega podjetja za leto 2013 v vseh pomembnih vidikih ustrezno prikazujejo njegovo finančno stanje na dan 31. decembra 2013 ter rezultate njegovega poslovanja in denarne tokove za leto, ki se je takrat končalo, v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil;
Takes note that the Joint Undertaking's ex post audit strategy which was adopted on 25 November 2010 has been modified on 20 February 2013; ascertains from the Court's report that with the modifications made in 2013, the strategy is a key tool for assessing the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions;
je seznanjen, da je bila strategija naknadnih revizij skupnega podjetja, sprejeta 25. novembra 2010, 20. februarja 2013 spremenjena; na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da je ta strategija tako postala ključno orodje za ocenjevanje zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij;
Notes that according to the Court's report, payments made in 2013 relating to certificates of acceptance of costs issued by the national funding authorities (‘NFAs’) of the Member States amounted to EUR 11700000, which accounts for 57 % of the total operational payments;
na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da so v letu 2013 izvršena plačila, povezana z izjavami o prevzemu stroškov, ki jih izdajo nacionalni organi financiranja držav članic, znašala 11700000 EUR, kar je 57 % vseh plačil za poslovanje;
Observes with concern that the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include practical arrangements for ex post audits, although the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the NFAs;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da upravni sporazumi, podpisani z nacionalnimi organi financiranja, ne vsebujejo praktičnih ureditev za naknadne revizije, čeprav je bilo revidiranje zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov projektov zaupano tem organom;
Notes that the ex post strategy adopted by the Joint Undertaking states that it must assess at least once a year whether the information sent by the NFAs provide sufficient assurance as to the regularity and legality of the executed transactions;
ugotavlja, da mora skupno podjetje v skladu s strategijo naknadnih revizij, ki jo je sprejel njegov upravni odbor, vsaj enkrat letno preveriti, ali informacije, ki so jih posredovali nacionalni organi financiranja, dajejo zadostno zagotovilo o pravilnosti in zakonitosti izvršenih transakcij;
Notes that according to the Court's report, the Joint Undertaking received audit reports from the NFAs covering approximately 46 % of the costs relating to completed projects; notes with concern that the Joint Undertaking did not assess the quality of those audits and that, by the end of March 2014, the Joint Undertaking had not received information on the audit strategies of seven out of 23 NFAs; notes moreover that the Joint Undertaking was therefore not in a position to assess whether ex post audits provide sufficient assurance as to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions;
na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje prejelo revizijska poročila nacionalnih organov financiranja, ki zajemajo približno 46 % stroškov, povezanih z dokončanimi projekti; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje ni ocenilo kakovosti teh revizij in da do konca marca 2014 še ni prejelo informacij o revizijskih strategijah sedmih izmed 23 nacionalnih organov financiranja; prav tako ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje zato ni moglo oceniti, ali naknadne revizije dajejo zadostno zagotovilo o pravilnosti in zakonitosti povezanih transakcij;
Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that in addition to the improvements to its ex post audit strategy, an action plan was submitted which aims to remedy the deficiencies identified by the Court in its qualified opinion; acknowledges receipt from the Joint Undertaking of the last update with regard to the ex-post audit implementation in the Joint Undertaking; awaits the Court's opinion on the new formula proposed for the calculation of an estimated residual error rate in the Joint Undertaking's transactions; notes that the implementation of the action plan commenced in 2014; looks forward to the successful implementation of the entire action plan as well as to the Court's opinion on its outcome; points out that difficulties may arise as to the boundaries between NFA's sovereign authority and the Joint Undertaking's authority; calls on the Joint Undertaking to provide a first interim evaluation report on the implementation of the action plan;
je seznanjen z informacijo skupnega podjetja, da je bil poleg izboljšav strategije naknadnih revizij predložen tudi akcijski načrt za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je opredelilo Računsko sodišče v svojem mnenju s pridržkom; potrjuje, da je od skupnega podjetja prejel najnovejše informacije o uvedbi naknadnih revizij; pričakuje mnenje Računskega sodišča o predlagani novi formuli za izračun ocenjene preostale stopnje napake pri transakcijah skupnega podjetja; ugotavlja, da se je načrt začel izvajati leta 2014; se veseli uspešne izvedbe celotnega akcijskega načrta in mnenja Računskega sodišča o končnem rezultatu; poudarja, da bi utegnilo priti do težav glede razmejitve suverenih pristojnosti nacionalnih organov financiranja in pristojnosti skupnega podjetja; poziva skupno podjetje, naj posreduje prvo vmesno ocenjevalno poročilo o izvajanju akcijskega načrta;
Ascertains from the Court's report that the Joint Undertaking's initial 2013 budget included commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 68,9 million and was amended at the end of the year, thus reducing commitment appropriations to EUR 32,6 million; notes with concern that after the reduction, the utilisation rate of payment appropriations was only 69 %, while the utilisation rate for operational commitment appropriations was 99,4 %; the low budget implementation rate is mainly due to the lengthy and complex process for the financial closure of projects;
na osnovi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da so sredstva za prevzem obveznosti v prvotnem proračunu skupnega podjetja za leto 2013 znašala 68,9 milijona EUR in da je bil proračun ob koncu leta spremenjen, tako da se je ta znesek zmanjšal na 32,6 milijona EUR; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je zaradi tega zmanjšanja stopnja uporabe sredstev za plačila znašala samo 69 %, stopnja uporabe operativnih sredstev za prevzem obveznosti pa 99,4 %; ugotavlja, da je nizka stopnja proračunskega izvrševanja v glavnem posledica dolgotrajnega in zapletenega postopka za finančni zaključek projektov;
Takes note that the maximum total budget of the Joint Undertaking, as per its establishing Regulation, amounts to EUR 410 million in order to cover the operational expenses; notes furthermore that the current amount of committed appropriations for the calls for proposals accounts for EUR 201 million, representing 49 % of the total budget;
je seznanjen, da ustanovitvena uredba skupnega podjetja predvideva najvišji skupni proračun v znesku 410 milijonov EUR za kritje odhodkov iz poslovanja; ugotavlja tudi, da prevzete obveznosti za javne razpise trenutno znašajo 201 milijon EUR, kar je 49 % skupnega proračuna;
Is concerned that there is poor information regarding the evaluation of the Member States' and Research and Development organisations' contributions corresponding to the actual level of Union's payments; in line with the information received, the contribution of the Member States is under the level of 1,8 as requested by the Joint Undertaking's statute; calls on the Joint Undertaking to submit a report to the discharge authority concerning the contributions of all members other than the Commission, including the application of the evaluation rules, together with an assessment by the Commission;
je zaskrbljen, ker je na voljo malo informacij o ocenah, ali prispevki držav članic ter organizacij za raziskave in razvoj ustrezajo dejanski ravni izplačil Unije; na osnovi prejetih informacij ugotavlja, da prispevek držav članic ne dosega 1,8-kratne vrednosti, kot zahteva statut skupnega podjetja; poziva skupno podjetje, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice predloži poročilo o prispevkih vseh članov razen Komisije, vključno z uporabo pravil za vrednotenje, priloži pa naj tudi oceno Komisije;
Takes into consideration that the new Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the Union was adopted on 25 October 2012 and took effect on 1 January 2013 while the model financial regulation for public-private partnership bodies referred to in Article 209 of the new Financial Regulation did not enter into force until 8 February 2014; notes that the financial rules of the Joint Undertaking have not been amended to reflect these changes because of the merger into ECSEL Joint Undertaking;
upošteva, da je bila nova finančna uredba, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Unije, sprejeta 25. oktobra 2012 in je začela veljati 1. januarja 2013, vendar pa je vzorčna finančna uredba za subjekte javno-zasebnega partnerstva iz člena 209 nove finančne uredbe začela veljati šele 8. februarja 2014; ugotavlja, da zaradi združitve v skupno podjetje ECSEL finančna pravila skupnega podjetja niso bila spremenjena, da bi odražala te spremembe;
Notes the Joint Statement by the Parliament, the Council and the Commission [1] and the subsequent political agreement reached on the separate discharge to be given by the Parliament upon recommendation of the Council, for Joint Undertakings under Article 209 of the Financial Regulation;
je seznanjen s skupno izjavo Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije [1] ter posledičnim političnim dogovorom o posebni razrešnici, ki jo Parlament v skladu s členom 209 finančne uredbe na priporočilo Sveta podeli skupnim podjetjem;
Reiterates its demand to the Court to present a complete and appropriate financial assessment of rights and obligations of the Joint Undertaking for the period up to the date of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking starting activity;
znova poziva Računsko sodišče, naj predloži popolno in ustrezno finančno oceno pravic in obveznosti skupnega podjetja za obdobje do datuma, ko je začelo poslovati skupno podjetje ECSEL;
Is concerned that the Joint Undertaking has not set up an internal audit capability as required by Article 6(2) of its establishing Regulation; notes moreover that although the mission charter of the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) was adopted by the Governing Board on 25 November 2010, the financial rules of the Joint Undertaking have not been amended in order to include the provision of the model financial regulation referring to the powers of the IAS;
je zaskrbljen, ker skupno podjetje ni ustanovilo službe za notranjo revizijo, kot zahteva člen 6(2) njegove ustanovitvene uredbe; ugotavlja tudi, da je upravni odbor 25. novembra 2010 sicer sprejel listino o delu službe Komisije za notranjo revizijo, vendar finančna pravila skupnega podjetja niso bila spremenjena, zato ne vsebujejo določb vzorčne finančne uredbe o pooblastilih notranjega revizorja Komisije;
Takes note that in 2013, the IAS performed an audit on the adequacy and effectiveness of the Joint Undertaking's internal control system with regard to management of experts; acknowledges from the audit conclusions that the current internal control system provides reasonable assurance for the achievement of the Joint Undertakings objectives as regards the management of experts; furthermore, notes that several important recommendations were made regarding the adoption of a comprehensive confidentiality policy as well as for the sensitivity of the programme officer's post and for the rules for the allocation of the workload for the remote evaluators;
je seznanjen, da je služba za notranjo revizijo v letu 2013 revidirala ustreznost in uspešnost sistema notranjih kontrol skupnega podjetja, kar zadeva upravljanje strokovnjakov; je seznanjen z revizijsko ugotovitvijo, da sedanji sistem notranje kontrole daje razumno zagotovilo za doseganje ciljev skupnega podjetja na področju upravljanja strokovnjakov; ugotavlja še, da je bilo med revizijo danih tudi več priporočil glede sprejetja celovite politike zaupnosti, občutljivosti mesta vodje programa in pravil za razporeditev delovne obremenitve izvajalcev vrednotenja na daljavo;
Acknowledges that the Joint Undertaking, along with the Clean Sky, ENIAC, FCH and IMI Joint Undertakings has been the subject of an IT risk assessment of their shared IT infrastructure performed by the IAS;
je seznanjen, da je služba za notranjo revizijo za skupna podjetja Artemis, Čisto nebo, ENIAC, FCH in IMI opravila oceno tveganja za IT v zvezi s skupnimi infrastrukturami IT, ki si jih ta podjetja delijo;
Acknowledges from the Court's report that the Disaster Recovery Plan for the Joint Undertaking's common IT infrastructure has not been approved; notes that the Joint Undertaking has taken measure at its own level in order to deal with emergency situations;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo v poročilu Računskega sodišča, da načrt ponovne vzpostavitve delovanja po nesreči za skupno infrastrukturo IT skupnega podjetja še ni odobren; ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje sprejelo lastne ukrepe za izredne razmere;
Notes with great concern that the Joint Undertaking failed to respect the 2014 recommendations of the discharge authority and did not adopt a comprehensive policy for the prevention and management of conflict of interests; reiterates the need for a clear definition of the concept of conflict of interest, which has to include the financial as well as the non-financial interest;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da skupno podjetje ni upoštevalo priporočila organa za podelitev razrešnice iz leta 2014 in ni sprejelo celovite politike za preprečevanje in obvladovanja navzkrižja interesov; znova poudarja, da je treba jasno opredeliti, kaj je navzkrižje interesov, in da se mora to nanašati tako na finančne kot na nefinančne interese;
Urges the Joint Undertaking to proceed to a rapid, complete and in-depth disclosure of CVs and declaration of interests by its Executive Director and members of the Governing Board by September 2015; requests as well the creation of a regularly updated database which includes all information related to conflicts of interest and a procedure to manage them along with a mechanism for dealing with breaches of the policy by September 2015;
poziva skupno podjetje, naj do konca septembra 2015 poskrbi za hitro, popolno in poglobljeno razkritje življenjepisov in izjav o interesih izvršnega direktorja in članov upravnega odbora; zahteva tudi, da podjetje do konca septembra 2015 vzpostavi redno posodobljeno podatkovno zbirko, ki bo zajemala vse informacije, povezane z navzkrižji interesov, ter postopek za njihovo upravljanje in mehanizem za obravnavo kršitev pravilnika;