natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Conflicts of interest and transparency
Nasprotja interesov in preglednost
Acknowledges from the Network that over 80 % of all decentralised agencies have an anti-fraud strategy in place; notes that of the four remaining agencies, three were set to develop and adopt an anti-fraud strategy during 2016 while the fourth, the European Police Office, applies the principles and standards defined in the Commission’s anti-fraud strategy, together with a strong financial model entailing continuous ex ante and ex post verification activities; takes note that all adopted strategies take into account the European Anti-Fraud Office’s methodology and guidance for anti-fraud strategies;
je seznanjen z navedbami mreže, da ima več kot 80 % vseh decentraliziranih agencij oblikovano strategijo za boj proti goljufijam; ugotavlja, da nameravajo tri od štirih preostalih agencij pripraviti in sprejeti strategije za boj proti goljufijam v letu 2016, medtem ko četrta, tj. Evropski policijski urad, uporablja načela in standarde, opredeljene v strategiji Komisije za boj proti goljufijam, skupaj s trdnim finančnim modelom, ki vključuje stalne dejavnosti predhodnega in naknadnega preverjanja; ugotavlja, da vse sprejete strategije upoštevajo metodologijo in smernice za strategije za boj proti goljufijam, ki jih je pripravil Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam;
Acknowledges the agencies' view that the trust of Union citizens in Union institutions, agencies and bodies is of the highest importance; notes that the agencies have introduced a number of concrete measures and tools to address adequately the risks of actual and perceived conflicts of interest; calls on the agencies to consider a strategy on how to get closer to Union citizens; notes that all agencies have already adopted policies for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest, and that those policies are aligned with the Commission’s guidelines on the prevention and management of conflicts of interest in EU decentralised agencies; notes that those policies include, inter alia, measures for detecting potential risks at an early stage, identification of best practice in other entities such as the Commission, other agencies and the European Anti-Fraud Office as well as conflicts of interest policies for staff and collaborators not covered by the Staff Regulations; invites the agencies to consider the advantages and disadvantages of having common regulations governing conflicts of interest;
priznava stališče agencij, da je zaupanje državljanov Unije v institucije, agencije in organe Unije zanje izjemno pomembno; ugotavlja, da so uvedle številne konkretne ukrepe in orodja, da bi ustrezno obravnavale tveganje dejanskih in domnevnih nasprotij interesov; poziva agencije, naj razmislijo o strategiji za približevanje državljanom Unije; ugotavlja, da so vse agencije že sprejele politike za preprečevanje in obvladovanje nasprotja interesov ter da so te politike usklajene s smernicami Komisije za preprečevanje in obvladovanje nasprotja interesov v decentraliziranih agencijah EU; ugotavlja, da te politike med drugim vključujejo ukrepe za odkrivanje morebitnih tveganj v zgodnji fazi, opredelitev najboljše prakse v drugih subjektih, kot so Komisija, druge agencije in Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam, ter politike v zvezi z nasprotji interesov za osebje in sodelavce, ki jih ne zajemajo kadrovski predpisi; poziva agencije, naj preučijo prednosti in pomanjkljivosti uporabe skupnih predpisov, ki urejajo nasprotja interesov;
Calls for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption in the public sector, and especially within the Union institutions and agencies, through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest, the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries;
poziva, naj se preprečevanje korupcije v javnem sektorju, zlasti v institucijah in agencijah Unije, in boj proti njej na splošno izboljšata s pomočjo celostnega pristopa, zato je najprej treba izboljšati dostop javnosti do dokumentov in uvesti strožja pravila glede navzkrižja interesov, uvesti ali okrepiti registre za preglednost in zagotoviti zadostne vire za ukrepe kazenskega pregona, tudi z izboljšanjem sodelovanja med državami članicami in z ustreznimi tretjimi državami;
Notes with concern that some agencies are yet to adopt whistle-blowing guidelines; demands that all those Union institutions and agencies that have not yet done so urgently adopt internal rules on whistleblowing and take a common approach to their obligations, focusing on the protection of whistle-blowers; calls on the institutions and agencies to pay special attention to the protection of whistle-blowers in the context of the soon-to-be-adopted Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure; calls on the Commission to promote legislation on a minimum level of protection for whistle-blowers in the Union; calls on the institutions and agencies to ensure that they not only formally oblige officials to report irregularities of all kinds but also lay down adequate protection for whistle-blowers; calls on the institutions and agencies to implement Article 22c of the Staff Regulations without delay;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da nekatere agencije še niso sprejele smernic za prijavljanje nepravilnosti; zahteva, da vse institucije in agencije Unije, ki tega še niso storile, nujno sprejmejo interni pravilnik za prijavo nepravilnosti in uporabijo skupen pristop k svojim obveznostim, s poudarkom na zaščiti prijaviteljev nepravilnosti; poziva institucije in agencije, naj posebno pozornost nameni zaščiti prijaviteljev nepravilnosti, saj naj bi bila kmalu sprejeta direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varovanju nerazkritega strokovnega znanja in izkušenj ter poslovnih informacij (poslovnih skrivnosti) pred njihovo neupravičeno pridobitvijo, uporabo in razkritjem; poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja zakonodajo o minimalni zaščiti za prijavitelje nepravilnosti v Uniji; poziva institucije in agencije, naj zagotovijo, da kadrovski predpisi ne bodo zgolj uradno zavezovali uradnikov k sporočanju vseh vrst nepravilnosti, temveč da bodo tudi določali ustrezno zaščito za prijavitelje nepravilnosti; poziva institucije in agencije, naj začnejo brez odlašanja izvajati člen 22c kadrovskih predpisov;
Takes note from the Network that 16 agencies (52 %) use expert groups, scientific panels and committees and almost all of them take into account concerns raised by the European Ombudsman's own-initiative inquiry (OI/6/2014/NF) opened on 12 May 2014 into their staffing policies for these groups; urges those that do not already take into account these factors to do so, without delay; calls on the agencies to apply the new rules which should be adopted by the Commission on expert groups;
na podlagi navedb mreže ugotavlja, da 16 agencij (52 %) uporablja strokovne skupine, znanstvene skupine in odbore ter da skoraj vse agencije pri svojih kadrovskih politikah za navedene skupine upoštevajo pomisleke, ki jih je v preiskavi na lastno pobudo (OI/6/2014/NF), ki se je začela 12. maja 2014, izrazila evropska varuhinja človekovih pravic; poziva agencije, ki teh dejavnikov ne upoštevajo, naj to nemudoma naredijo; poziva agencije, naj začnejo uporabljati nova pravila, ki jih mora sprejeti Komisija za strokovne skupine;
Ascertains that 29 agencies (over 90 %) have policies in place on the publication of the CVs and declarations of interest of their management board members, management staff and external and in-house experts; notes furthermore that 23 agencies (74 %) publish their CVs and declarations of interest on their websites; notes with concern that some of the agencies have issues publishing the CVs or declarations of interest of their management board members, as there is no mechanism which would oblige the management board members to provide these documents; urges the agencies' management board members who have not yet provided documents confirming the absence of conflicts of interest to submit these documents for publication on the respective agencies' websites without delay in order to increase transparency;
potrjuje, da ima 29 agencij (več kot 90 %) oblikovane politike o objavi življenjepisov in izjav o interesih za člane svojih upravnih odborov, upravljalno osebje ter zunanje in notranje strokovnjake; poleg tega ugotavlja, da 23 agencij (74 %) na svojih spletnih mestih objavlja življenjepise in izjave o interesih za svoje osebje; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da imajo nekatere agencije težave z objavljanjem življenjepisov ali izjav o interesih za člane svojih upravnih odborov, ker ni na voljo mehanizma, ki bi člane upravnih odborov obvezal k predložitvi teh dokumentov; poziva člane upravnih odborov agencij, ki še niso predložili dokumentov, ki potrjujejo odsotnost nasprotja interesov, naj te dokumente nemudoma predložijo za objavo na spletnih mestih zadevnih agencij, da se zagotovi večja preglednost;
Requests that all Union institutions and agencies implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations by publishing information about senior officials who have left the service and a list of conflicts of interest on an annual basis; requests that all Union institutions and agencies assess the compatibility of post-EU employment or the situation whereby civil servants and former Members of the European Parliament move from the public to the private sector (the 'revolving door' issue) and the possibility of a conflict of interest, and define clear cooling-off periods, which should cover at least the period for which transitional allowances are granted;
zahteva, naj vse institucije in agencije Unije ravnajo v skladu s členom 16 kadrovskih predpisov in objavijo podatke o višjih uradnikih, ki niso več zaposleni, ter seznam nasprotij interesov enkrat na leto; zahteva, da institucije in agencije Unije ocenijo združljivost nove zaposlitve nekdanjih uslužbencev EU in nekdanjih poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, ko ti iz javnega sektorja preidejo v zasebnega (problem pojava vrtljivih vrat), in možnost nasprotja interesov, hkrati pa naj jasno določi obdobje mirovanja, ki bi moralo zajemati vsaj obdobje, v katerem se izplačujejo prehodna nadomestila;
Underlines the need to enhance integrity and improve the ethical framework through better implementation of codes of conduct and ethical principles, so as to reinforce a common and effective culture of integrity for all Union institutions and agencies;
poudarja, da je treba z boljšim izvajanjem kodeksov ravnanja in etičnih načel povečati integriteto in izboljšati etični okvir ter tako okrepiti skupno in učinkovito kulturo integritete za vse institucije in agencije Unije;
Calls on those Union institutions and agencies which have introduced codes of conduct, including Parliament, to step up their implementation measures, such as checks on declarations of financial interests;
poziva tiste institucije in agencije Unije, ki so sprejele kodeks ravnanja, vključno s Parlamentom, naj pospešijo svoje izvedbene ukrepe, npr. preverjanje izjav o finančnih interesih;
Calls upon all agencies to use the framework to be created by the new Inter Institutional Agreement on a Mandatory Transparency Register and use it to guide their interaction with organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in Union policy-making and policy implementation in order to create more transparency around lobbying activities;
poziva vse agencije, naj uporabijo okvir, ki bo nastal z novim medinstitucionalnim sporazumom o obveznem registru za preglednost, in ga uporabijo za usmerjanje svojih stikov z organizacijami in samozaposlenimi posamezniki, ki so vključeni v oblikovanje in izvajanje politik Unije, da bi zagotovile večjo preglednost na področju lobističnih dejavnosti;
Notes that the principle of ‘value for money’ and ‘EU added value’ also holds for agencies, which should ensure that citizens are well informed of the results of the agencies’ activities; notes that achieving results is important; emphasises that many agencies do not explicitly include in their annual reports information on the effectiveness and efficiency of their activities in an accountable manner; reiterates that it is important for the Network to become a member of the new Inter-institutional Working Group on Performance in order to reach a common understanding of performance-based and results-oriented budgeting principles, as well as to identify possible improvements to the performance models currently applied in the agencies; requests that the Court of Auditors provide an evaluation of the agencies' performance and results in time for the review of the 2016 Multiannual Financial Framework;
ugotavlja, da načelo „stroškovne učinkovitosti“ in „dodane vrednosti EU“ zavezuje tudi agencije, ki bi morale zagotavljati, da so državljani dobro obveščeni o rezultatih dejavnosti agencij; ugotavlja, da jo doseganje rezultatov pomembno; poudarja, da številne agencije v svoja letna poročila ne vključijo izrecno informacij o učinkovitosti in uspešnosti svojih dejavnosti, kar bi bilo odgovorno; ponavlja, da je pomembno, da mreža postane član nove medinstitucionalne delovne skupine za uspešnost, da se doseže skupni dogovor o načelih priprave proračuna, ki temeljijo na uspešnosti in so usmerjena v rezultate, ter da opredeli morebitna izboljšanja modelov uspešnosti, ki se trenutno uporabljajo v agencijah; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj oceno uspešnosti in rezultatov agencij pripravi še pravočasno za pregled večletnega finančnega okvira v letu 2016;
Communication and visibility
Komunikacija in prepoznavnost
Takes note from the Network that nearly all agencies have included on their websites the statement that they are agencies of the Union, with the exception of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, which states that it is an independent advisory body to the Parliament, the Council and the Commission; notes furthermore that 50 % of the agencies have published information on their website in all the Union languages, four agencies have offered information in 23 languages of the Union, 22 % offer information in at least two languages and 9 % of the agencies have websites available only in English, with some having plans to expand the availability to German; acknowledges furthermore that a full multilingual approach for all agencies is not currently feasible due to the need for additional resources; invites the agencies to consider using social media tools, surveys and focus groups to measure public awareness and assess ways to improve their communications strategy in future;
na podlagi navedb mreže ugotavlja, da so skoraj vse agencije na svojih spletnih mestih objavile izjavo, da so agencije Unije, razen Evropskega organa za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine, ki navaja, da je neodvisni posvetovalni organ Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije; poleg tega ugotavlja, da 50 % agencij na svojih spletnih mestih objavlja informacije v vseh jezikih Unije, štiri agencije informacije zagotavljajo v 23 jezikih Unije, 22 % agencij zagotavlja informacije v vsaj dveh jezikih in 9 % jih ima spletna mesta na voljo le v angleškem jeziku, pri čemer nekatere od teh načrtujejo, da ga bodo zagotovile tudi v nemškem jeziku; poleg tega priznava, da celovit večjezični pristop pri vseh agencijah trenutno ni izvedljiv zaradi potrebe po dodatnih virih; poziva agencije, naj preučijo uporabo orodij družbenih medijev, anket in ciljnih skupin za merjenje ozaveščenosti javnosti ter ocenijo načine za izboljšanje svojih komunikacijskih strategij v prihodnosti;
Acknowledges the Network's statement that the agencies are strongly committed to increasing their presence on social media; takes note that only a few agencies are not yet present on social media but that they are committed to engaging in such communication in the near future; observes that promotional activities through social media include reports, events, job opportunities and procurements; notes, moreover, that social media activities are integrated with other communication tools of the agencies;
potrjuje izjavo mreže, da si agencije zelo prizadevajo za povečanje prisotnosti v družbenih medijih; ugotavlja, da le nekaj agencij še ni prisotnih v družbenih medijih, vendar si prizadevajo za vzpostavitev takšne komunikacije v bližnji prihodnosti; opaža, da promocijske dejavnosti prek družbenih medijev vključujejo poročila, dogodke, objavo prostih delovnih mest in javna naročila; poleg tega ugotavlja, da so dejavnosti v družbenih medijih dopolnjene z drugimi komunikacijskimi orodji agencij;
Calls on the agencies to further strengthen their efforts and to improve their communication policies, to expand their visibility through different social media tools, in order to raise awareness of their activities and achievements and to ensure that citizens are well informed about their work;
poziva agencije, naj si še bolj prizadevajo in izboljšajo svojo komunikacijsko politiko, povečajo prepoznavnost z uporabo različnih družbenih medijev, da bi javnost ozaveščale o svojih dejavnostih in dosežkih, ter zagotovijo, da bodo državljani dobro obveščeni o njihovem delu;
Notes that on the basis of the agencies’ contributions, the Commission has elaborated guidelines with standard provisions for headquarter agreements between decentralised agencies and host Member States; notes that as of January 2016, four agencies are still in the negotiation process with their host Member State, compared with 10 agencies in the previous year; reiterates the importance of these agreements for agency operations and security; urges agencies and Member States which have not entered into a headquarters agreement to do so without further delay;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija na podlagi prispevkov agencij pripravila smernice s standardnimi določbami za sporazume o sedežu med decentraliziranimi agencijami in državami članicami gostiteljicami; ugotavlja, da so januarja 2016 štiri agencije še vedno vključene v postopek pogajanj s svojimi državami članicami gostiteljicami, medtem ko je bilo v predhodnem letu takih agencij 10; ponovno poudarja pomen teh sporazumov za delovanje agencij in varnost; poziva agencije in države članice, ki še niso sklenile sporazuma o sedežu, naj to nemudoma naredijo;
Draws attention to the importance of the social aspects of the agencies' headquarter agreement with their hosting country, such as the predictability of staff's social and living conditions (schooling fees, status questions, etc.);
opozarja na pomen socialnih vidikov sporazumov o sedežih agencij z gostiteljskimi državami, kar zadeva predvidljivost socialnih in življenjskih razmer zaposlenih (šolnine, vprašanje statusa itd.);
Notes with concern that some agencies have dual seats, and regards it as essential that all dual seats which do not offer any operational added value should be done away with at the earliest opportunity;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da imajo nekatere agencije še vedno dva sedeža, in meni, da bi bilo treba čim prej odpraviti dvojne sedeže, ki ne prinašajo nobene operativne dodane vrednosti;
Asks the Union institutions and bodies to apply strictly the measures pertaining to discretion and exclusion in public procurement, with proper background checks being carried out in every instance, and to apply the exclusion criteria so as to debar companies in the event of any conflict of interest, this being essential to protect the financial interests of the Union;
poziva institucije in organe Unije, naj dosledno uporabljajo ukrepe, ki se nanašajo na diskrecijo in izključitev pri javnih naročilih, tako da preverijo ozadje vsakega posameznega primera, poleg tega pa naj uporabljajo merila za izključitev in tako izločijo podjetja, ki so v kakršnem koli navzkrižju interesov, kar je bistvenega pomena za zaščito finančnih interesov Unije;
Reminds the Court of Auditors that the Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed in paragraph 54 of the Common Approach that all aspects of outsourced external audits ‘remain under the full responsibility of the [Court], which manages all administrative and procurement procedures required’; asks the Commission to confirm urgently that the Common Approach still applies; deeply regrets that the new audit approach involving private sector auditors resulted in an 85 % increase in administrative burden on the agencies, equating to more than 13000 additional hours or an average of 3,5 full time equivalents (FTEs) compared with the previous audit managed by the Court of Auditors; regrets that the time spent on the procurement and administration of audit contracts created more than 1400 man hours of additional work for the decentralised agencies, and that the total additional expenditure on external private sector audits in 2014 amounted to EUR 550000; calls on the Court of Auditors to provide better guidance to private auditors so as significantly to reduce the augmented administrative burden;
želi Računsko sodišče spomniti, da so se Parlament, Svet in Komisija v točki 54 skupnega pristopa dogovorili, da je za vse vidike zunanjih revizij, oddanih v zunanje izvajanje, „v celoti odgovorno Evropsko računsko sodišče, ki vodi vse potrebne upravne postopke in postopke v zvezi z javnimi naročili“; prosi Komisijo, naj nemudoma potrdi, da skupni pristop še velja; globoko obžaluje, da je novi revizijski pristop, ki vključuje revizorje iz zasebnega sektorja, povzročil 85-odstotno povečanje upravnega bremena agencij, kar ustreza več kot 13000 dodatnim uram ali v povprečju 3,5 ekvivalenta polnega delovnega časa v primerjavi s prejšnjimi revizijami, ki jih je upravljalo Računsko sodišče; obžaluje, da je bilo za javna naročila in upravljanje revizijskih pogodb porabljenih več kot 1400 ur dodatnega dela v decentraliziranih agencijah ter da so skupni dodatni odhodki za zunanje revizije iz zasebnega sektorja v letu 2014 znašali 550000 EUR; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj zagotavlja boljša navodila zasebnim revizorjem, da bi se znatno zmanjšalo povečano upravno breme;
Calls on all the Union institutions and agencies to enhance their procedures and practices aimed at safeguarding the financial interests of the Union and to actively contribute to a results-oriented discharge process;
poziva vse institucije in agencije Unije, naj izboljšajo postopke in prakse za zaščito finančnih interesov Unije ter naj dejavno prispevajo k ciljno usmerjenemu postopku razrešnice;
Suggests that Parliament, the Council and the Commission consider merging smaller agencies which perform similar or interlinked tasks; argues that this would provide efficiency savings in the long term;
predlaga, naj Parlament, Svet in Komisija preučijo možnost združitve manjših agencij, ki opravljajo podobne oziroma medsebojno povezane naloge; trdi, da bi se tako dolgoročno zagotovili prihranki na podlagi učinkovitosti;
States that the annual reports of the Union institutions and agencies could play an important role in compliance regarding transparency, accountability and integrity; calls on the Union institutions and agencies to include a standard chapter on these components in their annual reports;
izjavlja, da bi lahko imela letna poročila institucij in agencij Unije pomembno vlogo pri ravnanju v skladu z načeli preglednosti, odgovornosti in integritete; poziva institucije in agencije Unije, naj v svoja letna poročila vključijo standardno poglavje o teh sestavinah;