natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A. whereas according to its financial statements, the budget of the European Railway Agency (‘the Agency’) for the financial year 2012 was EUR 25799000, representing a decrease of 0,72 % compared to 2011,
ugotavlja, da je zaradi proračunskega spremljanja v proračunskem letu 2012 stopnja izvrševanja proračuna dosegla 99,91 %; ugotavlja, da je bila stopnja izvrševanja plačil 95,49 %;
Highlights the Agency’s vital role in ensuring the safety and interoperability of rail systems in Europe; notes furthermore that a review of the Agency’s powers is currently under way as part of the Fourth Railway Package; stresses that should it be accorded greater powers, the Agency will need to be given the financial, material and human resources it needs to perform its tasks successfully;
ugotavlja, da je po navedbah v poročilu Računskega sodišča delež odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti, v letu 2012 znašal 99,9 %, kar priča, da so bile obveznosti sprejete pravočasno; kljub temu ugotavlja, da je bila v naslovu II (upravni odhodki) stopnja prenosa odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti, v leto 2013 visoka, saj je znašala kar 36,8 % (600000 EUR); se zaveda, da sta bila glavna razloga za to pozen prejem računov za storitve v zvezi s prostori, ki so bile opravljene leta 2012 (300000 EUR), ter nakup računalniške strojne in programske opreme, ki je bila po načrtih naročena v zadnjih mesecih leta 2012 (300000 EUR), dobavljena pa šele leta 2013;
Notes from the Court of Auditors’ report that corrective actions taken in response to previous year’s comments are ongoing;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je iz letnega poročila o dejavnostih fundacije in ugotovitev Računskega sodišča razvidno, da sta bili višina in narava prerazporeditev v letu 2012 skladni s finančnimi pravili; izraža pohvalo fundaciji za dobro proračunsko načrtovanje;
corrective measures were implemented in order to reduce the negative impact on the Agency’s activities as regards the significant turnover of operational staff; calls on the Agency, however, to inform the discharge authority of the impact of the measures taken,
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče v letnem revizijskem poročilu za leto 2012 na osnovi vzorčnih transakcij in drugih revizijskih ugotovitev ni imelo pripomb glede postopkov javnih naročil v fundaciji;
actions were taken to address deficiencies related to the appropriations carried forward, namely the implementation of stricter rules as regards the deadline for signing contracts, the revision of IT specific contracts allowing invoicing in line with the deliverables and the introduction of a new invoicing system by the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union allowing for the reduction of carry-overs in the area of translation,
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče v letnem revizijskem poročilu za leto 2012 ni imelo pripomb glede postopkov zaposlovanja v fundaciji;
in order to improve the recruitment procedures, to ensure transparency and equal treatment of candidates and to avoid conflicts of interest in the selection procedures, a new procedure for the selection and recruitment of staff and new guidelines for section committees were adopted;
pozdravlja ukrepe, ki jih je fundacija sprejela v odgovor na očitke, da nima politike vodenja zakladnice in da postopki zaposlovanja niso pregledni;
Notes that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2012 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 94,92 % and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 85,63 %;
obžaluje, da upravni odbor pred uradno odločitvijo Parlamenta ni obvestil o tem, da namerava podaljšati mandat direktorici v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1339/2008; opominja, da ta postopek ni povezan s kakovostjo posameznika, ki je potrjen kot direktor; zahteva polno spoštovanje vloge in pristojnosti Parlamenta, kot predvideva omenjena uredba;
Two locations
pozdravlja sprejetje smernic za preprečevanje in obvladovanje navzkrižja interesov junija 2013; poziva fundacijo, naj jih objavi na spletnem mestu;
Deplores the fact that using two locations (Lille and Valenciennes) to carry out its activities exposes the Agency to additional costs; acknowledges the efforts made by the Agency to minimise the negative impact of the decision on its seat;
ugotavlja, da življenjepisi in izjave o interesih članov upravnega odbora ter izjave o interesih izvršne direktorice in najvišjih vodstvenih delavcev niso objavljeni; poziva fundacijo, naj to nepravilnost nemudoma odpravi;
Calls for a single location for the Agency, in a place easily accessible by public transport in order to save scare resources and increase its efficiency;
je seznanjen z navedbami fundacije, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo (IAS) s 23. majem 2013 uradno zaključila 12 izmed 14 priporočil iz svoje revizije komunikacije v letu 2011 in da fundacija nima več nezaključenih priporočil z oznako „zelo pomembno“; ugotavlja pa, da še zmeraj ostajata nezaključeni dve priporočili iz revizije zunanje in notranje komunikacije, ki jo je IAS opravila leta 2011, in da sta obe označeni kot „pomembni“, pri čemer je enega fundacija že uresničila in trenutno čaka, da ga IAS pregleda in zaključi, drugo pa se še izvaja in naj bi bilo glede na načrtovane ukrepe v celoti izvedeno leta 2013;
Acknowledges that the Agency will review its policy on the prevention and management of conflicts of interests in 2014 on the basis of Commission’s Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interests in EU Decentralised Agencies; calls on the Agency to inform the discharge authority on the assessment results once available;
UL C 365, 13.12.2013, str.
Acknowledges from the Agency that in 2012 the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS) carried out an audit (‘Building Blocks of Assurance’) during the last quarter of 2012 which resulted in 10 recommendations for the Agency, two of which were rated as ‘very important’, seven as ‘important’ and one as ‘desirable’; notes that due to the late timing of the 2012 IAS audit, it was not possible for the Agency to provide detailed information on the actions planned in order to close the IAS recommendations; calls on the Agency to inform the discharge authority of those actions;
206.
Notes that there are no outstanding recommendations marked as ‘very important’ from the 2011 IAS audit on ‘Expert management in Interoperability’ and that there are two outstanding recommendations marked as ‘important’ which were open at the end of 2013; calls on the Agency to inform the discharge authority of the actions taken;
UL L 354, 31.12.2008, str.
Notes that the Court of Auditors indicates in its annual audit report for 2012 that the Agency has suppressed the Internal Audit Capability and has replaced it with an Internal Control Coordinator (ICC) post;
82.
Regrets that the recruitment procedure for the ICC post was lengthy and that as of January 2014, the selected candidate had not yet started working at the Agency;
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropske agencije za varnost in zdravje pri delu za proračunsko leto 2012
Notes with concern that the Court of Auditors indicates in its annual audit report for 2012 that the Agency does not comply with its Internal Control Standard regarding business continuity and that no approved IT Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery plans exist; acknowledges that the Agency has decided to implement adequate measures in order to ensure the continuity of the IT services and systems that are horizontal to the Agency’s business; calls on the Agency to inform the discharge authority on actions implemented;
ob upoštevanju letnih računovodskih izkazov Evropske agencije za varnost in zdravje pri delu za proračunsko leto 2012,
OJ C 365, 13.12.2013, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Evropske agencije za varnost in zdravje pri delu za proračunsko leto 2012 z odgovori agencije [1],ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta z dne 18. februarja 2014 (05849/2014 – C7-0054/2014),
184.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve (A7-0193/2014),
OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p.
A. ker računovodski izkazi Evropske agencije za varnost in zdravje pri delu (v nadaljevanju: agencija) kažejo, da je proračun agencije v proračunskem letu 2012 znašal 15260512 EUR, kar je predstavljalo 6,95-odstotno povišanje glede na leto 2011;
1.
pozdravlja dejstvo, da agencija še naprej prispeva k visokim standardom zdravja in varnosti pri delu v Uniji; opozarja na pomembne osrednje dejavnosti agencije v letu 2012, kot je projekt Foresight o tveganjih, povezanih z okolju prijaznimi službami, in začetek akcije za zdrava delovna mesta; z veseljem pričakuje nov večletni strateški program agencije, ki bo tesno povezan s cilji strategije Evropa 2020 in bo v pomoč pri oblikovanju nujno potrebne in težko pričakovane strategije Unije za varnost in zdravje pri delu za obdobje 2013–2020;
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2] (‘the Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 185 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 establishing a European Railway Agency [4], and in particular Article 39 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu zapisalo, da sta dva od štirih popravnih ukrepov, s katerima se je agencija odzvala na pripombe iz preteklega leta, označena kot „dokončana“, druga dva ukrepa pa kot ukrepa „v teku“;
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2012
poroča o znižanju stopnje storniranih sredstev za leto 2012 na 5,7 % v primerjavi z 8 % za leto 2011; poleg tega ugotavlja, da se bo od leta 2014 izvajal model oblikovanja proračuna po dejavnostih, da bi še dodatno izboljšali splošno notranje načrtovanje agencije in spremljanje njenega letnega načrta upravljanja, s čimer bi zagotovili boljše izvajanje proračuna,
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2012,
je v finančni uredbi agencije in njenih izvedbenih pravilih določeno, da je treba vsaj enkrat vsaka tri leta izvesti popis opreme, zadnji popis pa je bil dokončan leta 2012,
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2012, together with the Authority’s replies [1],having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 (05849/2014 – C7-0054/2014),
je agencija sprejela osnutek dogovora o sedežu z državo gostiteljico, da bi se izognila nadaljnjim zamudam v dokončanju pogajanj;
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2] (‘the Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 185 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) [4], and in particular Article 64 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
ugotavlja, da je zaradi proračunskega spremljanja v proračunskem letu 2012 stopnja izvrševanja proračuna dosegla 94,64 % in da je stopnja izvrševanja plačil znašala 73,43 %;
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0231/2014),
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je bilo 3200000 EUR (22 % proračuna) prenesenih v leto 2013 in da je stopnja prenesenih proračunskih sredstev visoka za naslov II (36 %) in naslov III (33 %); priznava, da je pri naslovu II glavni razlog za prenose obnovitev letnih pogodb za IT, ki so bile v skladu z načrti sklenjene v zadnjem četrtletju leta 2012; priznava, da je bila visoka stopnja za naslov III posledica večletnega značaja večjih projektov in zamud v dodeljevanju posebnih pogodb;
A. whereas, according to its financial statements, the budget of the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘the Authority’) for the financial year 2012 was EUR 20279000, representing an increase of 19,53 % compared to 2011,
ugotavlja, da je stopnja storniranih sredstev za sredstva iz naslova I za leto 2012 znašala 9,5 %; priznava, da je bila ta stopnja storniranih sredstev v glavnem posledica zamrznjenih postopkov zaposlovanja in predvidenega, a še ne izplačanega zvišanja plač;
B. whereas, according to its financial statements, the overall contribution of the Union to the Authority’s budget for 2012 amounted to EUR 6408000, representing a decrease of 5,54 % compared to 2011,
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče v letnem revizijskem poročilu za leto 2012 na osnovi vzorčnih transakcij in drugih revizijskih ugotovitev ni imelo pripomb glede postopkov javnih naročil v agenciji;
Recalls that Parliament was a key actor in the establishment of the Authority — together with the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority — as one of the three economic and financial European Supervisory Authorities which are still in a setting-up phase; therefore, considers that better coordination at European level is still needed;
je seznanjen, da bo agencija v letu 2014 sprejela politiko na področju navzkrižja interesov na osnovi smernic Komisije o preprečevanju in obvladovanju navzkrižja interesov v decentraliziranih agencijah EU; poziva agencijo, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o sprejetju te politike;
Believes that the Authority’s role in promoting stable and safe financial markets and the stability of the financial system and in bringing about secure operation of European equities markets is essential for the economic recovery and the creation of sustainable jobs and growth in Europe;
ugotavlja, da življenjepisi in izjave o interesih članov upravnega odbora, izvršnega direktorja in najvišjih vodstvenih delavcev niso dostopni javnosti; poziva agencijo, naj to nepravilnost nemudoma odpravi;
Notes from the Court of Auditors’ report that in response to the nine comments made the Court in 2011, one corrective action is marked as ‘outstanding’, five as ‘ongoing’ and, as of September 2013, three were finalised; recalls that this process must be fully completed, including in what regards the cancellation of carry-overs, the lack of transparency of selection procedures and the inadequacies of budgetary planning;
je seznanjen z navedbami agencije, da je Služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo (IAS) leta 2012 izvedla poglobljeno oceno tveganj in predložila svoj končni strateški revizijski načrt za obdobje 2013–2015, ki sta ga potrdila direktor agencije in njen upravni odbor; ugotavlja, da je IAS izvedla tudi revizijo upravljanja pogodb in javnih naročil in da je rezultat tega sedem priporočil (brez kritičnih priporočil, dve zelo pomembni priporočili), katerih izvajanje je na pravi poti; ugotavlja, da je IAS opravila preverjanje svojih predhodnih priporočil in ugotovila, da nobeno kritično priporočilo ni odprto in da je izvajanje dveh zelo pomembnih priporočil na pravi poti;
the validation of accounting systems has been finalised by both the Authority’s accountant and the Management Board,
UL C 365, 13.12.2013, str.
a close monitoring of budget execution by the Authority’s management has been implemented in order to ensure that corrective actions related to low commitment execution rates are taken in due time; observes, furthermore, that a more rigorous verification and authorisation process for managing carry-overs has been established in 2012,
275.
the recruitment templates and guidelines have been revised and improved, with more rigorous controls and checks of supporting documents being undertaken in order to improve recruitment procedures,
UL L 216, 20.8.1994, str.
in order to avoid conflicts of interest, the Authority’s conflicts of interest policy, due to be adopted by the Management Board, includes a provision that the Management Board members confirm that their awareness of their obligations in relation to conflicts of interest shall be made public;
1.
Notes that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2012 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 86,12 % and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 65,22 %;
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2] (v nadaljevanju: finančna uredba), zlasti člena 185 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [3], zlasti člena 208 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2062/94 z dne 18. julija 1994 o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost in zdravje pri delu [4], zlasti člena 14 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5],ob upoštevanju Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1271/2013 z dne 30. septembra 2013 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 208 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], zlasti člena 108 Delegirane uredbe,ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih sklepov in resolucij o razrešnici,
Notes with concern that the level of committed appropriations carried over is high at 39 % for Title II and at 52 % for Title III; acknowledges that for Title II, this was mainly caused by the fact that a significant contract for works on the Authority’s premises was awarded in December 2012 (EUR 600000) and that for Title III, the high level of committed appropriations carried over results from the multiannual nature of significant IT development projects and delays in related procurements;
ob upoštevanju letnih računovodskih izkazov Agencije za oskrbo Euratom za proračunsko leto 2012,
Notes with concern that the Authority made 22 budget transfers amounting to EUR 3200000, representing 16 % of total 2012 budget, which indicates weaknesses in budget planning;
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Agencije za oskrbo Euratom za proračunsko leto 2012 z odgovori agencije [1],ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta z dne 18. februarja 2014 (05849/2014 – C7-0054/2014),
Regrets that according to the Court of Auditors’ annual audit, there is considerable room for improving the timeliness and documentation of procurement procedures;
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2], zlasti člena 185 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [3], zlasti člena 208 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2008/114/ES, Euratom z dne 12. februarja 2008 o določitvi statuta Agencije za oskrbo Euratom [4], zlasti člena 8 Sklepa,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5],ob upoštevanju Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1271/2013 z dne 30. septembra 2013 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 208 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], zlasti člena 108 Delegirane uredbe,ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih sklepov in resolucij o razrešnici,
Notes with concern that according to the Court of Auditors’ annual audit, the level of transparency of the Authority’s recruitment procedures needs to be improved; calls on the Authority to implement corrective measures and to inform the discharge authority on the results of measures taken;
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A7-0180/2014),
Acknowledges that following the Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 15/2012, the Authority revised its ethics guidelines, jointly with the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, on the basis of the Commission’s Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interests in EU Decentralised Agencies; welcomes the fact that those guidelines were assessed by the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS) in 2013 and were considered as best practices;
A. ker računovodski izkazi Agencije za oskrbo Euratom (v nadaljevanju: agencija) kažejo, da je končni proračun agencije v proračunskem letu 2012 znašal 104000 EUR;
Observes that the CVs and declarations of interests of the members of the Board of Supervisors and members of the Management Board, as well as the declarations of interests of the Executive Director and senior management, are not publicly available; calls on the Authority to remedy the situation as a matter of urgency;
Vsebinski poudarki
Acknowledges that the Authority took an important step during its second year of activity with the adoption and implementation of the baseline requirements for all internal control standards; notes with concern that full implementation of the standards has not been achieved;
opozarja Komisijo na ugotovitve Računskega sodišča, da agencija med letoma 2008 in 2011 ni imela svojega proračuna in da je Komisija neposredno financirala vse odhodke in sprejela razrešnico zanje, kar je po mnenju Računskega sodišča v nasprotju s statutom agencije;