natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the context of the 2008 banking crisis, the Authority has taken appropriate steps to ensure the swift adoption of decisions upon complete notification, and when necessary within less than 2 weeks.
V okviru bančne krize v letu 2008 je Nadzorni organ že primerno ukrepal, da zagotovi hitro sprejemanje odločitev po popolni priglasitvi, ter če je treba v manj kot dveh tednih.
See the Authority’s Guidelines on the application of State aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions in the context of the current global financial crisis (not yet published in the OJ or the EEA Supplement), which corresponds to the Communication from the Commission — The application of State aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions in the context of the current global financial crisis (OJ C 270, 25.10.2008, p. 8).
Glej Smernice Nadzornega organa o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za ukrepe v zvezi s finančnimi institucijami v okviru trenutne svetovne finančne krize (še neobjavljene v UL ali Dopolnilu EGP), ki ustrezajo Sporočilu Komisije z naslovom Uporaba pravil o državni pomoči za ukrepe v zvezi s finančnimi institucijami v okviru trenutne svetovne finančne krize (UL C 270, 25.10.2008, str. 8).
As regards the real economy, see the Authority’s Temporary framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis (not yet published in the OJ or the EEA Supplement), which corresponds to the Communication from the Commission — Temporary Community framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis (OJ C 83, 7.4.2009, p. 1).
Glede realnega gospodarstva glej Začasni okvir Nadzornega organa za ukrepe državnih pomoči v podporo dostopu do financiranja ob trenutni finančni in gospodarski krizi (še neobjavljen v UL ali Dopolnilu EGP), ki ustreza Sporočilu Komisije z naslovom Začasni okvir Skupnosti za ukrepe državnih pomoči v podporo dostopu do financiranja ob trenutni finančni in gospodarski krizi (UL C 83, 7.4.2009, str. 1).
Decision No 195/04/COL (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37, EEA Supplement No. 26, 25.5.2006, p. 1) corresponds to Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1), which implements Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
Odločba št. 195/04/COL (UL L 139, 25.5.2006, str. 37, Dopolnilo EGP št. 26, 25.5.2006, str. 1) ustreza Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 (UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1), ki izvaja Uredbo (ES) št. 659/1999.
This time limit cannot be respected where the Authority has to issue several requests for information due to incomplete notifications.
Tega roka ni mogoče upoštevati, če mora Nadzorni organ zaradi nepopolnih priglasitev izdati več zahtev za informacije.
See Guidelines on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain types of State aid.
Glej Smernice o poenostavljenem postopku obravnave nekaterih vrst državnih pomoči.
See Article 4(5) of Part II of Protocol 3.
Glej člen 4(5) dela II Protokola 3.
Adopted by College Decision No 15/04/COL of 18 February 2004 (OJ L 154, 8.6.2006, p. 27 and EEA Supplement No 29, 8.6.2006, p. 1).
Sprejete z Odločbo Kolegija št. 15/04/COL z dne 18. februarja 2004 (UL L 154, 8.6.2006, str. 27, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 29, 8.6.2006, str. 1).
These guidelines correspond to the European Commission Communication of 1 December 2003 on professional secrecy in State aid decisions (OJ C 297, 9.12.2003, p. 6).
Te smernice ustrezajo Sporočilu Evropske komisije z dne 1. decembra 2003 o poklicni skrivnosti v odločbah o državni pomoči (UL C 297, 9.12.2003, str. 6).
Without prejudice to Article 10(1) of Part II of Protocol 3.
Brez poseganja v člen 10(1) dela II Protokola 3.
According to settled case-law of the Community Courts, the Authority is entitled to send the decision to open the formal investigation to identified third parties; see for example, Case T-198/01 Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau v Commission (2004) ECR II-2717, paragraph 195; T-198/01R Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau v Commission (2002) ECR II-2153; Joined Cases C-74/00 P and C-75/00 P Falck Spa and others v Commission (2002) ECR I-7869, paragraph 83.
Nadzorni organ ima v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso sodišč Skupnosti pravico poslati odločitev o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave ugotovljenim tretjim osebam; glej na primer zadevo T-198/01 Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau proti Komisiji, Zodl. 2004, str. II-2712, točka 195; zadevo T-198/01R Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. II-2153; združeni zadevi C-74/00 P in C-75/00 P Falck Spa in drugi proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. I-7869, točka 83.
Case C-119/97 Ufex and Others v Commission (1999) ECR I-1341, paragraph 88.
Zadeva C-119/97, Ufex in drugi proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str. I-1341, točka 88.
Case T-475/04 Bouygues SA v Commission (2007) ECR II-2097, paragraphes 158 and 159.
Zadeva T–475/04, Bouygues SA proti Komisiji, ZOdl. 2007, str. II–2097, točki 158 in 159.
See the Authority’s Guidelines on the enforcement of State aid law by national courts.
Glej Smernice Nadzornega organa o izvrševanju zakonodaje o državni pomoči na nacionalnih sodiščih.
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [2], in particular to Articles 61 to 63 thereof and Protocol 26 thereto,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [2] in zlasti členov 61 do 63 ter Protokola 26 k Sporazumu,
No 02/10/COL
št. 02/10/COL
concerning the status of Norway with regard to infectious haematopoietic necrosis and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia and repealing the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 302/08/COL of 21 May 2008
o statusu Norveške glede infekciozne hematopoetske nekroze in virusne hemoragične septikemije ter o razveljavitvi Odločbe Nadzornega organa Efte št. 302/08/COL z dne 21. maja 2008
HAVING REGARD to the Act referred to at point 4.1.5a of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU akta iz točke 4.1.5a poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP,
Council Directive 2006/88/EC of 24 October 2006 on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals [1],
Direktiva Sveta 2006/88/ES z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o zahtevah za zdravstveno varstvo živali in proizvodov iz ribogojstva ter o preprečevanju in nadzoru nekaterih bolezni pri vodnih živalih [1],
as adapted by way of Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement, in particular Article 50 of that Act,
kakor je bila sprejeta na podlagi Protokola 1 k Sporazumu EGP, in zlasti člena 50 tega akta,
By letter dated 3 May 1994 Norway submitted the appropriate justifications for granting, as far as infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN) and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) are concerned, the status of approved zone to its territory, as well as the national rules ensuring compliance with the conditions to be respected for maintenance of the approved status.
Norveška je z dopisom z dne 3. maja 1994 predložila ustrezne utemeljitve za pridobitev statusa odobrene cone na svojem ozemlju glede infekciozne hematopoetske nekroze (IHN) in virusne hemoragične septikemije (VHS) ter nacionalne predpise, ki zagotavljajo izpolnjevanje pogojev, ki jih je treba spoštovati za ohranitev odobrenega statusa.
By Decision of the Authority No 71/94/COL Norway was recognised as approved continental and coastal zone for fish with regard to IHN and VHS.
Norveška je bila z Odločbo Nadzornega organa Efte št. 71/94/COL priznana kot odobrena celinska in obalna cona za ribe glede IHN in VHS.
Following notification of an outbreak of VHS in Møre og Romsdal County in Norway, on 26 November 2007, Decision No 71/94/COL, as last amended by the EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 244/02/COL, was repealed by Decision No 302/08/COL, which established that the parts of Norway referred to in the Annex to that Decision were recognised as approved continental zone and as approved coastal zone for fish with regard to IHN and VHS.
Ko so 26. novembra 2007 potrdili izbruh VHS v okraju Møre og Romsdal na Norveškem, je bila Odločba št. 71/94/COL, nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo Nadzornega organa Efte št. 244/02/COL, razveljavljena z Odločbo št. 302/08/COL, s katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da so deli Norveške, navedeni v Prilogi k navedeni odločbi, priznani kot odobrena celinska cona in odobrena obalna cona za ribe glede IHN in VHS.
On 11 July 2008, an outbreak of VHS was confirmed in the coastal areas of Storfjorden in Norway.
Dne 11. julija 2008 je bil potrjen izbruh VHS na obalnem območju Storfjorden na Norveškem.
The competent authority in Norway has informed the Authority of the measures taken to eliminate the disease and to prevent its spread.
Pristojni organ na Norveškem je obvestil Nadzorni organ o ukrepih, sprejetih za odpravljanje bolezni in preprečitev njene širitve.
The Authority has assessed the information submitted to it by the competent authority in Norway and it appears, at this stage, that the measures taken are appropriate.
Nadzorni organ je ocenil informacije, ki mu jih je posredoval pristojni organ na Norveškem, in na tej stopnji se zdi, da so bili sprejeti ukrepi primerni.
Moreover, the Authority has discussed the matter with the European Commission and no changes have occurred in Norway with regards to IHN.
Nadalje je Nadzorni organ o zadevi razpravljal z Evropsko komisijo in na Norveškem ni prišlo do sprememb v zvezi z IHN.
It is the opinion of the Authority that Norway, with the exception of the areas referred to in the Annex, should still be recognised as approved continental zone and approved coastal zone for fish with regard to IHN and VHS.
Nadzorni organ meni, da je treba Norveško z izjemo območij, navedenih v Prilogi, še naprej priznavati kot odobreno celinsko cono in odobreno obalno cono za ribe glede IHN in VHS.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority,
Ukrepi, določeni v tej odločbi, so v skladu z mnenjem Veterinarskega odbora Efte, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu Efte –
Norway, with the exception of the areas referred to in the Annex, is recognised as approved continental zone and as approved coastal zone for fish with regard to IHN and VHS.
Norveška se z izjemo območij, navedenih v Prilogi, prizna kot odobrena celinska cona in odobrena obalna cona za ribe glede IHN in VHS.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 302/08/COL of 21 May 2008 concerning the status of Norway with regard to infectious haematopoietic necrosis and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia is hereby repealed.
Odločba Nadzornega organa Efte št. 302/08/COL z dne 21. maja 2008 o statusu Norveške glede infekciozne hematopoetske nekroze in virusne hemoragične septikemije se razveljavi.
This Decision shall enter into force on 5 January 2010.
Ta odločba začne veljati 5. januarja 2010.
Norway, with the exception of the Norwegian part of the catchment areas of Grense Jacobselv and Pasvik river and the rivers in between and the associated coastal region.
Norveška, z izjemo norveškega dela povodij rek Grense Jacobselv in Pasvik in rek, ki tečejo vmes, ter pripadajočega obalnega območja.
Norway, with the exception of:
Norveška, z izjemo:
The Norwegian part of the catchment areas of Grense Jacobselv and Pasvik river and the rivers in between and the associated coastal region.
norveškega dela povodij rek Grense Jacobselv in Pasvik in rek, ki tečejo vmes, ter pripadajočega obalnega območja.
Norway, with the exception of the coastal areas of Storfjorden (in the municipalities of Ørskog, Sykkylven, Stordal, Stranda and Norddal) delimited in the west by a line drawn between Røneset in Sykkylven municipality and Giljeneset in Ørskog municipality.
Norveška, z izjemo obalnih območij Storfjorden (občine Ørskog, Sykkylven, Stordal, Stranda and Norddal), ki jih na zahodu razmeji črta, ki poteka med Rønesetom v občini Sykkylven ter Giljenesetom v občini Ørskog.
East of the line of the entire fjord is excepted including the tidal line, landbased aquaculture farms that utilise seawater in the production and the landbases and quays of aquaculture farms in the fjord.
Del fjorda, ki je vzhodno od črte, vključno s črto plimovanja, ribogojnicami na kopnem, ki uporabljajo morsko vodo pri proizvodnji, ter postajami in nabrežji ribogojnic na fjordu, je izvzet.
The parts of water catchment areas that have its estuary in the containment area and that have upward migration of anadromous fish, and any cultivation installation in the anadromous part of the water catchment are also excepted from recognition as approved zone.
Predeli povodij, ki imajo rokave na okuženem območju in po vodi navzgor usmerjeno selitev anadromnih rib ter kakršne koli instalacije ribogojnic v anadromnem delu povodja, so prav tako izvzeti iz priznanja statusa odobrene cone.
No 34/10/COL
št. 34/10/COL
amending, for the 79th time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by introducing a new Chapter on the application of State aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks
o devetinsedemdeseti spremembi procesnih in materialnih pravil na področju državne pomoči z uvedbo novega poglavja o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči v zvezi s hitro postavitvijo širokopasovnih omrežij
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY [1], Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [2], in particular to Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26 thereof,
NADZORNI ORGAN EFTE [1] JE – ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [2] ter zlasti členov 61 do 63 Sporazuma in Protokola 26 k Sporazumu,
Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice [3] ,in particular to Article 24 and Article 5(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča [3] ter zlasti člena 24 in člena 5(2)(b) Sporazuma,
Under Article 24 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the Authority shall give effect to the provisions of the EEA Agreement concerning State aid.
v skladu s členom 24 Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču Nadzorni organ uveljavlja določbe Sporazuma EGP v zvezi z državno pomočjo,
Under Article 5(2)(b) of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the Authority shall issue notices or guidelines on matters dealt with in the EEA Agreement, if that Agreement or the Surveillance and Court Agreement expressly so provides or if the Authority considers it necessary.
Nadzorni organ v skladu s členom 5(2)(b) Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču izda obvestila ali smernice o zadevah, ki jih obravnava Sporazum EGP, če to izrecno določata navedeni sporazum ali Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču ali če Nadzorni organ meni, da je to potrebno,
The Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid were adopted on 19 January 1994 by the Authority [4].On 30 September 2009, the European Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) published a Communication from the Commission — Community Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks [5].The Commission’s Communication is also of relevance for the European Economic Area.
Nadzorni organ je 19. januarja 1994 sprejel procesna in materialna pravila na področju državne pomoči [4],Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 30. septembra 2009 objavila Sporočilo Komisije – Smernice Skupnosti o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči v zvezi s hitro postavitvijo širokopasovnih omrežij [5],Sporočilo Komisije je pomembno tudi za Evropski gospodarski prostor,
Uniform application of the EEA State aid rules is to be ensured throughout the European Economic Area.
treba je zagotoviti enotno uporabo pravil EGP glede državne pomoči v celotnem Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru,
According to point II under the heading ‘GENERAL’ at the end of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, the Authority, after consultation with the Commission, is to adopt acts corresponding to those adopted by the Commission.
v skladu s točko II pod naslovom „SPLOŠNO“ na koncu Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP mora Nadzorni organ po posvetovanju s Komisijo sprejeti akte, ki ustrezajo tistim, ki jih je sprejela Komisija,
The Authority consulted the Commission, and the EFTA States by letters on the subject dated 22 January 2010 (Events No 543740, 543741 and 543742),
Nadzorni organ se je o tej temi posvetoval z državami Efte v dopisih z dne 22. januarja 2010 (sklicne številke 543740, 543741 in 543742) –
The State Aid Guidelines shall be amended by introducing a new Chapter on the application of State aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks.
Smernice o državni pomoči se spremenijo z uvedbo novega poglavja o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči v zvezi s hitro postavitvijo širokopasovnih omrežij.
The new Chapter is contained in the Annex to this Decision.
Novo poglavje je v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
Guidelines on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, adopted and issued by the Authority on 19 January 1994, published in the Official Journal of the European Union L 231, 3.9.1994, p. 1 and EEA Supplement No 32, 3.9.1994, p. 1, as amended (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Aid Guidelines’).
Smernice o uporabi in razlagi členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma EGP ter člena 1 Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, ki jih je sprejel in izdal Nadzorni organ 19. januarja 1994, objavljene v Uradnem listu Evropske unije L 231, 3.9.1994, str. 1, in Dopolnilu EGP št. 32, 3.9.1994, str. 1, kakor so bile spremenjene (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Smernice o državni pomoči).
OJ C 235, 30.9.2009, p. 7.
UL C 235, 30.9.2009, str. 7.
APPLICATION OF STATE AID RULES IN RELATION TO RAPID DEPLOYMENT OF BROADBAND NETWORKS [1]1.
UPORABA PRAVIL O DRŽAVNI POMOČI V ZVEZI S HITRO POSTAVITVIJO ŠIROKOPASOVNIH OMREŽIJ [1]1.
Broadband connectivity is a key component for the development, adoption and use of information and communication technologies (hereinafter referred to as ‘ICT’) in the economy and in society.
Širokopasovna povezljivost je ključni del razvoja, uvajanja in uporabe informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IKT) v gospodarstvu in družbi.
Broadband is of strategic importance because of its ability to accelerate the contribution of these technologies to growth and innovation in all sectors of the economy and to social and territorial cohesion.
Širokopasovni dostop je strateško pomemben, ker lahko pospeši prispevek te tehnologije k rasti in inovacijam v vseh gospodarskih panogah ter k socialni in teritorialni koheziji.
In line with the Lisbon Strategy and subsequent communications [2] of the European Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Commission’), the Authority also supports the widespread availability of broadband services for all European citizens.
V skladu z lizbonsko strategijo in naknadnimi sporočili [2] Evropske komisije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) tudi Nadzorni organ podpira široko razpoložljivost širokopasovnih storitev za vse evropske državljane.
It should be recalled that in the ‘State aid Action Plan — Less and better targeted State aid: a roadmap for State aid reform 2005-2009’ [3], the Commission noted that State aid measures can, under certain conditions, be effective tools for achieving objectives of common interest.
Opozoriti je treba, da je Komisija v dokumentu Akcijski načrt državnih pomoči – Manjša in bolje usmerjena državna pomoč: časovni načrt za reformo državnih pomoči 2005–2009 [3] navedla, da so lahko ukrepi državne pomoči pod določenimi pogoji učinkovito orodje za doseganje ciljev skupnega interesa.
In particular State aid can correct market failures, thereby improving the efficient functioning of markets and enhancing competitiveness.
Državna pomoč lahko zlasti odpravi tržne nepopolnosti ter tako izboljša učinkovitost delovanja trgov in okrepi konkurenčnost.
Further, where markets provide efficient outcomes but these are deemed unsatisfactory from a cohesion policy point of view, State aid may be used to obtain a more desirable, equitable market outcome.
Če trgi sicer zagotavljajo učinkovite rezultate, vendar z vidika kohezijske politike veljajo za nezadovoljive, se lahko državna pomoč uporabi tudi za doseganje bolj zaželenih in uravnoteženih rezultatov na trgu.
In particular, a well targeted state intervention in the broadband field can contribute to reducing the ‘digital divide’ [4] that sets apart areas or regions within a country where affordable and competitive broadband services are on offer and areas where such services are not.
Dobro ciljno usmerjena državna intervencija na področju širokopasovnega dostopa lahko zlasti prispeva k zmanjšanju „digitalne ločnice“ [4], ki ločuje območja ali regije znotraj države, kjer so na voljo cenovno dostopne in konkurenčne širokopasovne storitve, od območij, kjer take storitve niso na voljo.
At the same time, it must be ensured that State aid does not crowd out market initiative in the broadband sector.
Hkrati je treba zagotoviti, da državna pomoč ne ovira tržnih pobud v sektorju širokopasovnih povezav.
If State aid for broadband were to be used in areas where market operators would normally choose to invest or have already invested, this could affect investments already made by broadband operators on market terms and might significantly undermine the incentives of market operators to invest in broadband in the first place.
Če bi se državna pomoč za širokopasovni dostop uporabila na območjih, v katera bi verjetno vlagali ali so že vložili udeleženci na trgu, bi to lahko vplivalo na naložbe operaterjev širokopasovnih povezav, ki so jih že izvedli v skladu s tržnimi pogoji, in resno ogrozilo spodbude udeležencev na trgu za vlaganje v širokopasovni dostop.
In such cases, State aid to broadband might become counterproductive to the objective pursued.
V takih primerih lahko državna pomoč za širokopasovni dostop negativno vpliva na zastavljeni cilj.
The primary objective of State aid control in the field of broadband is to ensure that State aid measures will result in a higher level of broadband coverage and penetration, or at a faster rate, than would occur without the aid, and to ensure that the positive effects of aid outweigh its negative effects in terms of distortion of competition.
Glavni cilj nadzora nad državno pomočjo na področju širokopasovnega dostopa je zagotoviti, da se bo z ukrepi državne pomoči dosegla višja stopnja pokritosti s širokopasovnim omrežjem in večja gostota omrežnih povezav ali da bi se ta stopnja dosegla hitreje kot brez pomoči, in zagotoviti, da pozitivni učinki pomoči prevladajo nad negativnimi v smislu izkrivljanja konkurence.
It should be recalled that the regulatory framework for electronic communications also deals with issues related to broadband access [5].
Opozoriti je treba, da regulativni okvir za elektronske komunikacije obravnava tudi vprašanja, povezana s širokopasovnim dostopom [5].
Thus, wholesale broadband markets are subject to ex ante regulation in all EFTA States [6].
Veleprodajni trgi širokopasovnega dostopa so zato v vseh državah Efte predmet predhodne ureditve [6].
In this regard, a number of initiatives that aim to address the new challenges that next generation access (hereinafter referred to as NGA) [7] networks raise from a regulatory point of view, in particular regarding access issues, have been undertaken [8].
V zvezi s tem so že bile sprejete številne pobude za obravnavanje novih izzivov, ki jih z regulativnega vidika ustvarjajo omrežja naslednje generacije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: omrežja NGA) [7], zlasti v zvezi s dostopom [8].