natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See also Commission Decision 2006/225/EC of 2 March 2005 on the aid scheme implemented by Italy for the reform of the training institutions (OJ L 81, 18.3.2006, p. 25), recital 43.
Glej tudi elektronsko sporočilo družbe IN z dne 14. aprila 2015 (dokument št. 753927).
Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/NHD/Vedlegg/Brev/2013_oppdragsbrev_innovasjonnorge.pdf#search=OPPDRAGSBREV&regj_oss=1
Sodba v združenih zadevah EPAC proti Komisiji, T-204/97 in T-270/97, EU:T:2000:148, točka 122.
See judgement in Federación Española de Empresas de Tecnología Sanitaria (FENIN) v Commission, C-205/03, EU:C:2006:453, paragraph 26.
Sodba v združenih zadevah Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale in Land Nordrhein-Westfalen proti Komisiji (West-LB), T-228/99 in T-233/99, EU:T:2006:405, točka 207.
AG Opinion in Federación Española de Empresas de Tecnología Sanitaria (FENIN) v Commission, C-205/03, EU:C:2005:666, paragraph 31.
Sodba West-LB, navedena v opombi X, točka 314, in sodba v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji (Eni-Lanerossi), C-303/88, EU:C:1991:136, točka 22.
See judgments in Pavel Pavlov and Others, C-180/98 to C-184/98, EU:C:2000:428, paragraph 76 and in Ambulanz Glöckner, C-475/99, EU:C:2001:577, paragraph 20.
Sodba v združenih zadevah Chronopost SA proti Komisiji, C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P in C-94/01 P, EU:C:2003:388, točka 40.
Case E-6/98, Norway v ESA, Rep. 1998 p. 242, paragraph 34.
Oddelek 1(2) Smernic za proizvodne dejavnosti, ki določa, da je „[t]o poglavje […] najprej po eni strani osredotočeno na akt iz točke 1 Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP, v nadaljnjem besedilu: direktiva o preglednosti, po drugi strani pa razvija načelo, da v primeru, ko država zagotovi finančna sredstva družbi v okoliščinah, ki ne bi veljale za vlagatelja, delujočega v običajnih razmerah tržnega gospodarstva, to stori v nasprotju z načelom vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu in gre za državno pomoč“.
See also judgments in Commission and Spain v Government of Gibraltar and United Kingdom, C-106/09 and C-107/09, EU:C:2011:732 and France v Commission, C-241/94, EU:C:1996:353, paragraphs 19 and 20.
Smernice za proizvodne dejavnosti so na voljo na spletnem naslovu: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1 & showLinkID=16995 & 1=1 ( UL L 274, 26.10.2000, Dopolnilo EGP št. 48 z istega dne).
Judgment in Ladbroke Racing v Commission, T-67/94, EU:T:1998:7, paragraph 52, and SIC v Commission, T-46/97, EU:T:2000:123, paragraph 83.
Prav tam, točka 1 pod naslovom „Uporaba načela vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu“.
Judgment in Chronopost SA v Commission, C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P and C-94/01 P, EU:C:2003:388, paragraph 40.
To je v skladu s pooblastili, določenimi v zvezi z javnimi storitvami.
See, for example, the Authority's Decisions No 84/15/COL regarding the alleged cross-subsidisation of maritime courses provided by Redningsselskapet and the University of TromsØ (OJ C 193, 11.6.2015, p. 9), available at: http://www.eftasurv.int/media/esa-docs/physical/84-15-COL.pdf); No 142/03/COL Regarding Reorganisation and Transfer of Public Funds to the Work Research Institute (OJ C 248, 16.10.2003, p. 6); No 343/09/COL on the property transactions engaged in by the Municipality of Time concerning property numbers 1/152, 1/301, 1/630, 4/165, 2/70, 2/32 (OJ L 123, 12.5.2011, p. 72); No 496/13/COL concerning the financing of Harpa Concert Hall and Conference Centre (OJ L 172, 12.6.2014, p. 36), recital 56 and the decisions cited therein; and No 174/13/COL concerning the financing of municipal waste collectors (OJ C 263, 12.9.2013, p. 5).
Na primer, Nadzorni organ v smernicah za radiodifuzijo meni, da pri opravljanju javne službe ni razumno zahtevati dobička.
In the same vein, the Guidelines on State aid for Research, Development and Innovation (R & D&I) states that: ‘Where the same entity carries out activities of both economic and non-economic nature, the public funding of the non-economic activities will not fall under Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement if the two kinds of activities and their costs, funding and revenues can be clearly separated so that cross-subsidisation of the economic activity is effectively avoided.
Nasprotno pa je v zvezi z gospodarskimi dejavnostmi dobiček, ki je pošteno plačilo za kapital, pri katerem se upošteva tveganje, razumen.
Evidence of due allocation of costs, funding and revenues can consist of annual financial statements of the relevant entity’ (paragraph 18, emphasis added).
Glej odstavek 72 smernic.
These conditions are set out in the Transparency Directive (Commission Directive 2006/111/EC of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings (OJ L 318, 17.11.2006, p. 17)), incorporated into the EEA Agreement by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 55/2007 of 8 June 2007 (OJ L 266, 11.10.2007, p. 15 and EEA Supplement No 48, 11.10.2007, p. 12).
Družba IN prek platforme visitnorway.com zagotavlja gospodarske in negospodarske storitve.
Reference is made to the graphic included in IN's letter dated 28 October 2013 (Document No 688215).
Celotno delovanje platforme ne zagotavlja nujno dobička.
The Authority notes that the development costs were taken into account in the budget of IN for 2013, year in which the costs occurred.
Vendar je področje uporabe te odločbe omejeno na oceno, ali družba IN od gospodarskih storitev pridobi razumen dobiček.
See further details in recitals 113 to 115.
Podatki v zvezi z zagotavljanjem negospodarskih storitev ne spadajo na področje uporabe pravil o državni pomoči.
Attachment to IN's mail to the Authority dated 14 April 2015 (Document No 753927).
Nadzornemu organu so bile poslane podrobne Excelove preglednice v zvezi s stroški elitnih pogodb o partnerstvu in ekonomskim modelom razporejanja stroškov (dokument št. 727330).
Attachment 2 to IN's mail dated 14 April 2015 (Document No 753927).
Sodba v zadevi Francoska republika proti Komisiji (Stardust Marine), C-482/99, EU:C:2002:294, točka 70.
Annex 3 to IN's reply to the opening decision (Document No 720778).
Po mnenju Sodišča je „potrebna umestitev v obdobje, v katerem so bili sprejeti ukrepi finančne podpore, da se oceni gospodarska racionalnost ravnanja države in s tem prepreči kakršna koli ocena na podlagi poznejših razmer“ (točka 71).
A capitalised cost is recognised as part of a fixed asset on a company's balance sheet, rather than being charged to expense in the period incurred.
Dokument št. 720781.
Consequently, a non-capitalised costs is an expense only for the year in which it takes place.
Sodna praksa priznava, da si javne družbe morda prizadevajo za dolgoročno povečanje dobička.
A copy of the NRS 19 was sent to the Authority as Annex II to the letter dated 24 November 2014 (Document No 730560).
Glej sodbi v zadevah Italija proti Komisiji (Lanerossi), C-303/88, EU:C:1991:136, točka 22, in Italija proti Komisiji (Alfa-FIAT), C-305/89, EU:C:1991:142, točka 20, ter sodbo v združenih zadevah Ciudad de la Luz proti Komisiji, T-319/12 in T-321/12, EU:T:2014:604, točka 41.
According to the case-law, a measure which is potentially accessible to all undertakings is not selective.
Splošno sodišče je poudarilo, da morajo javna podjetja dokazati ekonomsko upravičenost svojih projektov.
See, inter alia, judgment in Germany v Commission, C-156/98, EU:C:2000:467, paragraph 22.
Glej sodbo v zadevi Corsica Ferries, T-565/08, EU:T:2012:415, točka 84.
The Authority notes that this methodology has been applied consistently to all the premium agreements since 2013, including the agreements concerning the two first pilot projects, i.e. VisitSØrlandet and VisitTrondheim.
Sodba v združenih zadevah van der Kooy BV, 67/85, 68/85 in 70/85, EU:C:1988:38, točki 29 in 30, ter sodba v zadevi Belgija proti Komisiji, C-56/93, EU:C:1996:64, točka 10.
In Annex 4 to the reply to the opening decision (Document No 720779), IN provided the Authority with a copy of all the signed premium partnership agreements.
Komisija je v odločbi SFMI-Chronopost ugotovila, da ni neobičajno, da se s plačili, ki jih novo podjetje izvede za logistično in komercialno podporo, ki jo zagotavlja matična družba, v začetni fazi krijejo le spremenljivi stroški.
The hourly full cost model differs from the basic cost model, were some common costs can be deducted from total cost.
(Odločba Komisije 98/365/ES z dne 1. oktobra 1997 o domnevni državni pomoči Francije za družbo SFMI-Chronopost (UL L 164, 9.6.1998, str. 37)).
This model has not been applied by IN in the framework of the partnership agreements.
Glej odgovor družbe IN na sklep o začetku postopka (dokument št. 720775).
IN has explained that since the Guidelines for User payments from 2011, this model was put aside.
Dopis družbe IN z dne 28. oktobra 2013 (dokument št. 688215) in odgovor družbe IN na sklep o začetku postopka (dokument št. 720775)).
The full cost methodology is used for all IN's services, if the same service can be provided by private actors (Document No 720775, reply to the opening decision).
Priloga 7 k odgovoru družbe IN na sklep o začetku postopka (dokument št. 720782).
The percentage of employees' time expended on the project is also pre-established (Doc No 720778, Annex 3 to IN's reply to the opening decision).
Dopis družbe IN z dne 28. oktobra 2013 (dokument št. 688215).
The Authority notes that in 2013 only the pilot projects were signed.
Sodbi v zadevah WestLB proti Komisiji, točka 254, in Ciudad de la Luz proti Komisiji, točka 44.
IN's letter dated 24 November 2014 (Document No 730560).
Dopis družbe IN z dne 24. novembra 2014 (dokument št. 730559).
In the reply to the opening decision (Document No 720775), IN explains in further detail that the RTBs and DMOs have been involved in the new project structure since 2013.
Kopija odgovora družbe NetNames je bila Nadzornemu organu poslana kot Priloga III k dopisu dužbe IN z dne 24. novembra 2014 (dokument št. 730560).
The RTBs and DMOs have also invested time and resources.
Sodbe v združenih zadevah Van Landewyck, 209/78 do 215/78 in 218/78, EU:C:1980:248, točka 88, v zadevi FFSA in drugi, C-244/94, EU:C:1995:392, točka 21, in v zadevi MOTOE, C-49/07, EU:C:2008:376, točki 27 in 28.
Their direct involvement and participation in the project justify an hourly rate below the general hour rate calculated by IN.
Glej elektronsko sporočilo, ki ga je družba IN poslala 17. aprila 2015 (dokument št. 754218), in odgovor družbe IN na sklep o začetku postopka (dokument št. 720775), poglavje 4.3.3.2.
A complete list of the extra cost of the pilots projects was submitted to the Authority as Annex 6 of IN's reply to the opening decision (Document No 720781).
Na tem sestanku so norveški organi zagotovili nove informacije in pojasnila v zvezi s predloženim dopisom z dne 1. septembra 2014.
This price methodology has been used by other private companies active in the market.
Nadzorni organ je družbi IN prav tako postavil dodatna vprašanja, na katera je odgovorila z elektronskim sporočilom z dne 17. oktobra 2014 [5].
Information regarding this costs allocation method can be found at: https://www.adspeed.com/Knowledges/1104/Blog/How_much_charge_advertising_website.html or http://www.quora.com/What-is-an-industry-accepted-cost-per-page-view-of-dynamic-content-not-cache-able For instance, this is the methodology used by Google for some of its services (information available at https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2472735?hl=en).
Regionalni turistični uradi in organizacije za upravljanje destinacij ne stremijo k čim večjemu dobičku za svoje lastnike.
IN's email to the Authority dated 14 April 2015 (Document No 753927).
Pač pa je njihov cilj spodbujati gospodarsko dejavnost turističnega sektorja na njihovih zadevnih geografskih območjih [21].
IN's email to the Authority dated 20 May 2015 (Document No 757843).
Natančneje, funkcija iskanja je bila za regionalne turistične urade in organizacije za upravljanje destinacij odvečna, licenčne pogodbe z družbami, kakršna je New Mind _BAR_
A copy of the account was submitted to the Authority attached to IN's letter dated 28 October 2013 (Documents No 688215 and to, Annex 3 to IN's reply to the opening decision (Document No 720778).
tellUs, pa so bile običajno prekinjene.
See also IN's email dated 14 April 2015 (Document No 753927).
Pritožnik je 13. januarja 2015 Nadzornemu organu poslal kopijo dopisa o državnem proračunu za leto 2015 [52].
Judgment in EPAC v Commission, T-204/97 and T-270/97, EU:T:2000:148, paragraph 122.
Po njegovem mnenju ta dopis potrjuje, da dejavnosti družbe IN na področju spletne infrastrukture in povezanih storitev ne spadajo v okvir njenih nalog, ki so omejene na promocijo Norveške kot turistične destinacije.
Judgment in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission, (West-LB) T-228/99 and T-233/99, EU:T:2006:405, paragraph 207.
Nadzorni organ poudarja, da norveški organi niso predložili dokazov, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče sklepati, da bodo prizadevanja družbe IN za promocijo turizma v državi uspešna samo, če se bodo navedene spletne storitve ponujale prek spletnega mesta visitnorway.com.
Judgment in West-LB, see above, paragraph 314 and in Italy v Commission (Eni-Lanerossi), C-303/88, EU:C:1991:136, paragraph 22.
Zato se Nadzorni organ ne strinja, da je za promocijo Norveške kot turistične destinacije nujno treba zagotavljati tudi spletno infrastrukturo in povezane storitve.
Judgment in Chronopost SA v Commission, C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P and C-94/01 P EU:C:2003:388, paragraph 40.
Nasprotno, obstajajo dokazi, da je družba IN v praksi pričakovala, da bodo te gospodarske dejavnosti v obdobju 2013–2018 ustvarjale dobiček.
Section 1(2) of the Manufacturing Guidelines, which provides that ‘[t]his Chapter firstly focuses on, the one hand, on the act referred to in point 1 of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the Transparency Directive and, on the other hand, it develops the principle that where the State provides finances to a company in circumstances that would not be applicable to an investor operating under normal market economy conditions, it does this in contradiction to the market economy investor principle, and state aid is involved’.
Družba IN je Nadzornemu organu predložila poslovni model na podlagi ocenjenih stroškov in prihodkov v zvezi s komercialnimi pogodbami, ki je kazal pozitivno neto sedanjo vrednost [107], pri čemer se je uporabila 7-odstotna diskontna stopnja.
The Manufacturing Guidelines are available at: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1 & showLinkID=16995 & 1=1 ( OJ L 274, 26.10.2000.
Iz podatkov je razvidno, da je naložba družbe IN v novo strukturo platforme visitnorway.com v letu 2013 prinesla dobiček.
EEA Supplement No 48 of the same date).
V letih 2014 in 2015 se pričakuje negativna stopnja dobička, za obdobje 2016–2018 pa je predviden stabilen in razumen dobiček.
Ibid, point 1 under the title ‘practicality of the market economy investor principle’.
Nacionalna turistična zveza, ki je bila skupni organ za državne, občinske in zasebne deležnike v turizmu, je bila ustanovljena leta 1903 in je delovala do leta 1984.
This is in line with the mandates established regarding public services.
Od takrat je tržna prizadevanja nacionalne turistične zveze nadaljevala fundacija NORTRA, ki se je leta 1999 preimenovala v NTC.
For instance, in the broadcasting guidelines the Authority considers that it is not reasonable to ask for a profit in the provision of the public service.
18. december 2007.
On the contrary, regarding economic activities a profit element, which represents the fair remuneration of capital taking into account risk, is reasonable.
Priloga 1 (dokument št. 688214) k dopisu družbe IN z dne 28. oktobra 2013 (dokument št. 688213).
See paragraph 72 of the Guidelines.
Prav tam, pododdelek 7.5.
IN provides through the platform visitnorway.com non-economic and economic services.
„Visitnorway.com“, stran 68.
The overall operation of the platform does not necessarily provide for a profit.
10. april 2012.
However, the scope of the present decision is limited to access whether IN obtains a reasonable profit from the economic services.
Priloga 4 (dokument št. 688216) k dopisu družbe IN z dne 28. oktobra 2013 (dokument št. 688213).
The figures regarding the provision of non-economic services fall outside the scope of the state aid rules.
Regionalni turistični urad je bil ustanovljen kot regionalno podjetje za regiji Aust-Agder in Vest-Agder leta 2010.
Detailed Excel sheets were sent to the Authority concerning the premium partner agreements costs and the economic model for cost allocation (Document No 727330).
Družba je v lasti okrožja in lokalnih organov ter nekaterih zasebnih družb, kot so Color Line, Fjord Line, Amusement Park itd. Glej „Vladna turistična strategija.
Judgment in French Republic v Commission (Stardust Marine), C-482/99, EU:C:2002:294, paragraph 70.
Destinacija Norveška.
According to the Court, ‘[i]t is necessary to place oneself in the context of the period during which the financial support measures were taken in order to assess the economic rationality of the State's conduct, and thus to refrain from any assessment based on a later situation’ (paragraph 71).
Nacionalna strategija za turizem“.
Document No 720781.
Priloga I k dopisu družbe IN z dne 24. novembra 2014.
The case-law accepts that public companies might look at long-term profit maximisation.
Pripombe k ugotovitvam družbe New Mind _BAR_
See judgments in Italy v Commission (Lanerossi), C-303/88, EU:C:1991:136, paragraph 22; Italy v Commission (ALFA-FIAT), C-305/89, EU:C:1991:142, paragraph 20; and Ciudad de la Luz v Commission, T-319/12 and T-321/12, EU:T:2014:604, paragraph 41.
Lastno spletno mesto organizacije za upravljanje destinacij
The General Court has underlined the need for public undertakings to demonstrate the economic rationale of their projects.
Sodbe v zadevah Höfner in Elser proti Macroton, C-41/90, EU:C:2011:732, točke 21 do 23, v zadevi Pavlov in drugi, C-180/98 do C-184/98, EU:C:2000:428, ter v zadevi Private Barnehagers Landsforbund, E-5/07, Poročilo Sodišča Efte [2008], str. 62, točka 78.
See judgment in Corsica Ferries, T-565/08, EU:T:2012:415, paragraph 84.
tellUs edini ponudnik spletnih in infrastrukturnih storitev, so morali vsi regionalni turistični uradi in organizacije za upravljanje destinacij s to družbo skleniti pogodbo za obe funkciji iskanja in ponudbe destinacij.
IN's letter dated 28 October 2013 (Document No 688215).
Poleg tega družba IN platformo ponuja regionalnim turističnim uradom in organizacijam za upravljanje destinacij, ki ne konkurirajo podjetjem zunaj norveških meja.
No 36/16/COL
št. 36/16/COL
to partially repeal Decision No 227/04/COL as regards the status for Iceland for Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia (VHS) [2016/1862]
o delni razveljavitvi Odločbe št. 227/04/COL, kar zadeva status Islandije glede virusne hemoragične septikemije (VHS) [2016/1862]
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 5a of Part 4.1 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 2006/88/EC of 24 October 2006 on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals [1]), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by point 4(d) of Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement and Article 1(2) and Article 3 of Protocol 1 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement,
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 5a dela 4.1 poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 2006/88/ES z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o zahtevah za zdravstveno varstvo živali in proizvodov iz ribogojstva ter o preprečevanju in nadzoru nekaterih bolezni pri vodnih živalih [1]), kakor je bil prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s točko 4(d) Protokola 1 k Sporazumu EGP ter členom 1(2) in členom 3 Protokola 1 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču,
Having regard to Decision No 494/13/COL of the EFTA Surveillance Authority (‘the Authority’) of 11 December 2013 empowering the College Member with special responsibility for veterinary and phytosanitary matters to take certain decisions in that field (Document No 683826),
ob upoštevanju Odločbe št. 494/13/COL Nadzornega organa Efte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Nadzorni organ) z dne 11. decembra 2013 o pooblastitvi člana kolegija s posebno odgovornostjo za veterinarske in fitosanitarne zadeve za sprejemanje določenih odločitev na navedenem področju (dok. št. 683826),
By Decision No 227/04/COL, the Authority recognised the whole continental and coastal area of Iceland as free from Infectious Haematopoietic Necrosis (IHN) and Viral Haemorraghic Septicaemia (VHS).
Nadzorni organ je z Odločbo št. 227/04/COL priznal celotno celinsko in obalno območje Islandije kot prosto infekciozne hematopoetske nekroze (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IHN) in virusne hemoragične septikemije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: VHS).
On 23 October 2015, Iceland notified through the Animal Disease Notification System an outbreak of VHS in lumpfish of wild origin used as brood fish in the Landnamsholf region.
Islandija je 23. oktobra 2015 prek sistema prijavljanja živalskih bolezni priglasila izbruh VHS v divjih morskih zajcih, ki se v regiji Landnamsholf uporabljajo kot plemenke.
Further information regarding the measures taken were provided by letter of 13 November 2015 (Document No 780869, IS ref.
Nadaljnje informacije o sprejetih ukrepih so bile predložene z dopisom z dne 13. novembra 2015 (dok. št. 780869, sklic IS ANR15110004/20.5).
ANR15110004/20.5).
Glede na navedeno bi bilo treba preklicati status prost VHS za Islandijo, kakor je bil priznan z Odločbo št. 227/04/COL.
In light of the above, the VHS-free status for Iceland, as recognised by Decision No 227/04/COL, should be withdrawn.
Kar zadeva status Islandije glede IHN, ni prišlo do nobenih sprememb.
No changes have occurred as regards Iceland's status for IHN.
Zato je primerno razveljaviti Odločbo št. 227/04/COL, samo kar zadeva status Islandije glede VHS.
It is therefore appropriate to repeal Decision No 227/04/COL as regards Iceland's VHS-status only.
Ta odločba je v skladu z mnenjem veterinarskega in fitosanitarnega odbora Efte –
This Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Veterinary and Phytosanitary Committee.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJO ODLOČBO:
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Odločba št. 227/04/COL se razveljavi, kar zadeva status Islandije glede virusne hemoragične septikemije.
Decision No 227/04/COL is repealed as regards Iceland's status for Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia.
Odločba št. 227/04/COL ostane v veljavi, kar zadeva status Islandije glede infekciozne hematopoetske nekroze.
Decision No 227/04/COL remains in force as regards Iceland's status for Infectious Haematopoietic Necrosis.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Islandijo.
This Decision is addressed to Iceland.
V Bruslju, 9. februarja 2016
Done at Brussels, 9 February 2016.
Za Nadzorni organ Efte
College Member
Direktor
Director
UL L 328, 24.11.2006, str.
No 58/16/COL-D
št. 58/16/COL-D
to approve national measures by Norway limiting the impact of Gyrodactylus salaris and to repeal Decisions No 298/08/COL and No 299/08/COL [2016/1863]
o odobritvi nacionalnih ukrepov, ki jih je sprejela Norveška za omejevanje učinka bolezni Gyrodactylus salaris, in o razveljavitvi odločb št. 298/08/COL in št. 299/08/COL [2016/1863]
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 5a of Part 4.1 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement (Council Directive 2006/88/EC of 24 October 2006 on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals [1]), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by point 4(d) of Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement and Articles 1(2) and 3 of Protocol 1 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 5a, dela 4.1, poglavja I Priloge I k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 2006/88/ES z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o zahtevah za zdravstveno varstvo živali in proizvodov iz ribogojstva ter o preprečevanju in nadzoru nekaterih bolezni pri vodnih živalih [1]), kakor je bil prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s točko 4(d) Protokola 1 k Sporazumu EGP ter členom 1(2) in členom 3 Protokola 1 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču,