natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
245.
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da dejanska stopnja izvajanja in pričakovana vrednost razpisov za oddajo predlogov skupaj ustrezata 206 milijonom EUR oziroma samo 50,2 % skupnega proračuna, čeprav je Uredba Sveta o ustanovitvi skupnega podjetja predvidela najvišji skupni proračun v višini 410 milijonov EUR za kritje odhodkov iz poslovanja; ugotavlja, da to kaže na nizko stopnjo izvrševanja proračuna, predvsem zaradi zapletenega finančnega postopka za zaključek projektov; ugotavlja, da je stopnja izvrševanja proračuna v celoti povezana z nacionalnimi obveznostmi držav članic;
OJ L 53, 22.2.2007, p.
Sistemi notranjega nadzora
1.
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče meni, da je skupno podjetje v letu 2012 okrepilo svoja prizadevanja za vzpostavitev in izvajanje učinkovitih finančnih, računovodskih in upravljavskih kontrolnih postopkov; poudarja, da so potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja, zlasti v zvezi s finančnim preverjanjem zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov in standardi notranjega nadzora;
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2012
ustrezno upošteva izjavo izvršnega direktorja o zanesljivosti iz leta 2012, ki izraža zadržek v zvezi s strategijo naknadnih revizij, vendar informacije v tem zadržku niso dovolj z vidika njenega izvajanja; poziva skupno podjetje, naj pridobi potrebno zagotovilo, ki ga zagotavljajo potrdila nacionalnih organov in strategija naknadnih revizij;
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2012,
obžaluje, da življenjepisi članov upravnega odbora in izvršnega direktorja niso objavljeni; poziva skupno podjetje, naj to nepravilnost nemudoma odpravi; poziva skupno podjetje, naj v okviru prihodnjega Skupnega podjetja ECSEL oblikuje in sprejme celovito politiko preprečevanja in obvladovanja navzkrižja interesov;
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2012, together with the Agency’s replies [1],having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 (05849/2014 – C7-0054/2014),
meni, da je visoka raven preglednosti osrednji element pri zmanjševanju tveganja navzkrižja interesov; zato poziva skupno podjetje, naj svojo politiko in/ali ureditev za preprečevanje in obvladovanje navzkrižij interesov ter izvedbena pravila, pa tudi seznam in življenjepise članov upravnega odbora, objavi na svojem spletnem mestu;
having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 of 26 October 2004 establishing a European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union [4], and in particular Article 30 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj spremlja politiko skupnega podjetja na področju obvladovanja in preprečevanja navzkrižja interesov ter do naslednjega postopka podelitve razrešnice pripravi posebno poročilo;
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on the Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0181/2014),
Skupno podjetje ECSEL (elektronske komponente in sistemi za evropski vodilni položaj)
A. whereas, according to its financial statements, the budget of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (‘the Agency’) for the financial year 2012 was EUR 89578000, representing a decrease of 24,21 % compared to 2011,
opozarja, da sta bili skupni podjetji Artemis in ENIAC ustanovljeni decembra 2007 na podlagi sedmega okvirnega programa za obdobje 10 let za razvoj ključnih kompetenc za nanoelektroniko oziroma za razvoj ključnih tehnologij za vgrajene računalniške sisteme; ugotavlja, da je Artemis začel delovati samostojno oktobra 2009, ENIAC pa je pridobil finančno avtonomijo julija 2010;
B. whereas, according to its financial statements, the overall contribution of the Union to the Agency’s budget for 2012 amounted to EUR 84000000, representing a decrease of 24,32 % compared to 2011,
opozarja, da je organ za podelitev razrešnice še naprej zaskrbljen zaradi nizkih stopenj izvrševanja njunega proračuna in tudi zaradi dejavnosti skupnih podjetij, ki so povezane z visokimi stanji denarnih sredstev; opozarja, da sta si prizadevali povečati in spodbuditi zasebne in javne naložbe v raziskave in inovacije na dveh dopolnilnih področjih, ki sta zelo pomembni za industrijsko strukturo v Evropi;
C. whereas the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2012 are reliable, but could not obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions,
ugotavlja, da je Komisija predložila predlog (COM(2013) 501) v okviru izvajanja programa Obzorje 2020, da bi vgrajene računalniške sisteme (Artemis) in nanoelektroniko (ENIAC) združili v eno pobudo, zaradi česar bi skupni podjetji Artemis in ENIAC prenehali opravljati svoje dejavnosti pred določenim rokom za njihovo prenehanje 31. decembra 2017; ugotavlja, da bo imelo novo skupno podjetje na področju elektronskih komponent in sistemov, tj. ECSEL (iz angleške kratice za „Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership“) obliko tristranskega institucionalnega javno-zasebnega partnerstva z namenskim pravnim subjektom, ki vključuje zasebni sektor, nacionalne organe in evropske organe;
Disclaimer of opinion on the legality and the regularity of the underlying transactions
ugotavlja, da bo ta novi pravni subjekt v skladu s členom 187 PDEU upošteval modelno finančno uredbo za JZP iz člena 209 finančne uredbe s posrednim upravljanjem ter prevzel vse pravice in obveznosti sedanjih skupnih podjetij Artemis in ENIAC; pričakuje, da bo Računsko sodišče izvedlo popolne in primerne finančne ocene pravic in obveznosti vsakega subjekta; v zvezi s tem opozarja na skupno izjavo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije o ločeni razrešnici za skupna podjetja v skladu s členom 209 finančne uredbe;
Regrets that because of the materiality and pervasiveness of the matter described on the basis of a disclaimer of opinion, the Court of Auditors was not able to express an opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts;
je presenečen, da je Komisija v tako skrajšanem roku in brez končne sklepne ocene rezultatov teh skupnih podjetij sklenila, da bo bistveno spremenila izvedbeno strategijo Unije za razvoj ključnih kompetenc za nanoelektroniko in razvoj ključnih tehnologij za vgrajene računalniške sisteme; opozarja na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta, da se pripravi analiza stroškov in koristi združitve, ki bi izpostavila njene morebitne prednosti in slabosti;
Basis for a disclaimer of opinion on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions
ugotavlja, da so vmesne ocene priporočile izvajanje prihodnjih skupnih tehnoloških pobud na pravni podlagi, ki je bolje prilagojena posebnim lastnostim javno-zasebnih partnerstev, in sicer z manjšimi upravnimi izdatki, večjo prožnostjo in manjšimi upravnimi bremeni, da bi k sodelovanju pritegnili predstavnike industrije na visoki ravni;
Regrets that in the absence of effective ex ante and ex post verifications, there is no reasonable assurance as to the legality and regularity of transactions; regrets that the Court of Auditors could not obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the legality and regularity of the audited grant transactions related to the Agency’s activities in 2012, which amount to EUR 56000000, representing 63 % of the operating expenditure;
poleg tega ugotavlja, da bi moralo Skupno podjetje ECSEL za dosego svojih ciljev zagotavljati finančno podporo predvsem z dodeljevanjem nepovratnih sredstev udeležencem na podlagi javnih in konkurenčnih razpisov za zbiranje predlogov, osredotočenih na dokazane tržne neuspehe;
Regrets that the Court of Auditors found that, notwithstanding the ex post audit strategy adopted in 2012 and three audits carried out, no 2012 expenditure has yet been verified;
obžaluje, da predlog Komisije ne vključuje preverjanja računov ter prihodkov in odhodkov skupnega podjetja ECSEL, ki bi ga opravilo Računsko sodišče, in navaja, da bo račune tega skupnega podjetja letno pregledal neodvisen revizijski organ; poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, kje je dodana vrednost takšnega predloga; poudarja, da je Računsko sodišče že od leta 2002 izključni revizor za skupna podjetja, ustanovljena v skladu s členom 187 PDEU, zato zelo dobro pozna te organe, tega znanja pa ne bi smeli pustiti neizkoriščenega;
Acknowledges from the Agency that its beneficiaries are the national Border Guard authorities of Member States and Schengen associated countries, who have to sign declarations that all information provided is full, reliable and true and certify that their requests for payment are substantiated by adequate supporting documents, when claiming reimbursement; notes that the Agency does not, therefore, consider that effective ex ante controls are absent, but that they are based on declarations made by public authorities and plausibility checks;
Horizontalni vidiki skupnih podjetij za evropske raziskave
Notes that the Agency undertook measures to strengthen the ex ante control framework and has put in place a risk based ex ante control system since June 2013; calls on the Agency and the Court of Auditors to come up with a mutually acceptable solution, which takes into account the Court of Auditors’ audit standards, as well as the Agency’s particular situation;
ugotavlja, da pristop Računskega sodišča k reviziji zajema analitične revizijske postopke, oceno ključnih kontrol nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov ter preverjanje poslov na ravni skupnega podjetja, ne pa na ravni članov ali končnih upravičencev skupnega podjetja;
Notes that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2012 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 98,86 % and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 75,23 %;
ugotavlja, da revizijska preverjanja na ravni članov ali končnih upravičencev izvaja skupno podjetje ali zunanje revizijske hiše, s katerimi skupno podjetje sklene pogodbo in jih nadzoruje;
Notes that the Court of Auditors’ annual audit found that EUR 21800000 (25 % of committed appropriations) was carried over to 2013, whereas carry-overs related to title III amounted to EUR 19600000; recalls that the level of carry-overs is mostly related to the operational and multiannual nature of the Agency’s activities;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 2/2013: „Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?“, v katerem je Računsko sodišče preučilo, ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (7OP);
Notes with concern that the level of carry-overs is excessive, as it was in 2011, and is at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality; acknowledges, however, that the carry-overs are an inevitable result of the Agency performing its duties;
ugotavlja, da je revizija zajela tudi vzpostavitev skupnih tehnoloških pobud;
Notes that according to the annual activity report, as well as the Court of Auditors’ audit findings, the Agency made 39 budgetary transfers, amounting to EUR 11500000, affecting 70 of the 79 budgetary lines; acknowledges that this is mostly due to the fact that the second budgetary amendment for 2012 addressing increased demands in autumn 2012 was only approved in October 2012; is of the opinion, therefore, that those transfers were necessary and well justified;
se strinja s sklepom Računskega sodišča, da so bile skupne tehnološke pobude vzpostavljene, da bi podpirale dolgoročne industrijske naložbe na določenih raziskovalnih področjih; vendar ugotavlja, da sta bili v povprečju potrebni dve leti, da je posamezna skupna tehnološka pobuda postala finančno samostojna, ob tem pa je Komisija odgovorna za tretjino pričakovane dobe delovanja skupnih tehnoloških pobud;
Notes with concern that the Court of Auditors identified in its annual audit report for 2012 shortcomings in the Agency’s recruitment procedures which affect transparency and equal treatment of candidates, namely that questions for written tests and interviews were set after applications had been examined by the selection board and that the selection board did not document all its meetings and decisions;
poleg tega ugotavlja, da so bile nekatere skupne tehnološke pobude po mnenju Računskega sodišča še posebno uspešne pri vključevanju malih in srednjih podjetij v svoje projekte in da je bilo skoraj 21 % sredstev, zagotovljenih iz skupnih tehnoloških pobud, namenjenih malim in srednjim podjetjem;
Acknowledges that the Agency has put in place several measures to manage and prevent situations of conflicts of interests and developed a detailed disciplinary procedure; calls on the Agency to indicate whether or not it has established a specific policy for the prevention and management of conflicts of interests based on the Commission’s guidelines;
opozarja na dejstvo, da skupna okvirna sredstva, ki naj bi bila potrebna za sedem evropskih raziskovalnih skupnih podjetij, ki jih je Komisija do zdaj ustanovila na podlagi člena 187 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, – z omembe vredno izjemo skupnega podjetja Galileo – za obdobje njihovega obstoja znašajo 21793000000 EUR;
Observes that the CVs and Declarations of Interests of the members of the Management Board, as well as the Declarations of Interests of the Executive Director and senior management, are not publicly available; calls on the Agency to remedy the situation as a matter of urgency;
ugotavlja, da so skupni predvideni v proračunu načrtovani prihodki skupnih podjetij za leto 2012 znašali približno 2,5 milijarde EUR ali približno 1,8 % splošnega proračuna Unije za leto 2012, pri čemer je bilo približno 618 milijonov EUR iz splošnega proračuna (denarni prispevek Komisije), približno 134 milijonov EUR pa so prispevali industrijski partnerji in člani skupnih podjetij;
Regrets that according to the Court of Auditors’ findings, the Agency’s physical inventory was incomplete and did not cover all assets owned and that assets under construction and assets purchased near the end of the year were not taken into account; regrets, moreover, that there was no procedure for the disposal of fixed assets; acknowledges from the Agency that a complete physical inventory has been established, including tangible assets which were written-off;
ugotavlja, da skupna podjetja zaposlujejo 409 zaposlenih za nedoločen in določen čas ali manj kot 1 % vseh uradnikov Unije, potrjenih v splošnem proračunu Unije (kadrovski načrt);
Acknowledges from the Agency that in 2012 the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS) conducted a risk assessment, which resulted in a Strategic Audit Plan 2013-2015 listing future audit topics;
opozarja, da celoten prispevek Unije, ki naj bi bil potreben za skupna podjetja za obdobje njihovega obstoja, znaša 11489000000 EUR;
Notes that the IAS also carried out a follow-up of its earlier audit recommendations to the Agency, and found that two very important recommendations were closed; notes that according to the IAS, the action plan developed by the Agency in order to address the remaining outstanding recommendations will mitigate the risks if it is implemented in a timely manner;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj ob upoštevanju velikih zneskov, ki so vključeni, in tveganj, še zlasti za ugled, celovito analizira skupne tehnološke pobude in druga skupna podjetja v ločenem poročilu; želi spomniti, da je Evropski parlament pred tem zahteval, da Računsko sodišče pripravi posebno poročilo o zmožnosti skupnih podjetij, da v povezavi s svojimi zasebnimi partnerji zagotovijo dodano vrednost in učinkovito izvajanje raziskovalnih, razvojno-tehnoloških in demonstracijskih programov Unije; trdi, da je takšna ocena, kar zadeva skupni podjetji ENIAC in Artemis, nujna.
Requests that the Agency communicate the results and impact its work has on European citizens in an accessible way, mainly through its website.
UL C 369, 17.12.2013, str.
251.
UL L 30, 4.2.2008, str.
OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p.
52.
1.
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja Čisto nebo za proračunsko leto 2012
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2] (‘the Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 185 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 of 26 October 2004 establishing a European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union [4], and in particular Article 30 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
ob upoštevanju letnih računovodskih izkazov Skupnega podjetja Čisto nebo za proračunsko leto 2012,
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2012
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Skupnega podjetja Čisto nebo za proračunsko leto 2012 z odgovori skupnega podjetja [1],ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta z dne 18. februarja 2014 (05851/2014 – C7-0053/2014),
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2012,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2], zlasti člena 185 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [3], zlasti člena 208 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 71/2008 z dne 20. decembra 2007 o ustanovitvi Skupnega podjetja „Čisto nebo“ [4], zlasti člena 11(4) Uredbe,ob upoštevanju finančnih pravil Skupnega podjetja Čisto nebo, ki so bila sprejeta s sklepom njegovega upravnega odbora 7. novembra 2008,
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2012, together with the Agency’s replies [1],having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2014 (05849/2014 – C7-0054/2014),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5],ob upoštevanju Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1271/2013 z dne 30. septembra 2013 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 208 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], zlasti člena 108 Delegirane uredbe,ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih sklepov in resolucij o razrešnici,
having regard to the Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2], and in particular Article 185 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 setting up the European GNSS Agency [4], and in particular Article 14 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5],having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,having regard to its previous discharge decisions and resolutions,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A7-0210/2014),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0223/2014),
A. ker je bilo Skupno podjetje Čisto nebo (v nadaljevanju: skupno podjetje) ustanovljeno leta 2007 za obdobje desetih let z namenom pospešiti razvoj, potrjevanje in predstavitev čistih tehnologij zračnega prometa v Uniji, da bi se lahko začele čim prej uporabljati,
A. whereas according to its financial statements, the budget of the European GNSS Agency (‘the Agency’) for the financial year 2012 was EUR 20848718, representing a decrease of 46,12 % compared to 2011,
B. ker je skupno podjetje začelo samostojno delovati leta 2009,
Notes that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2012 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 100 % and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 99,99 %;
C. ker so ustanovni člani skupnega podjetja Evropska unija, ki jo zastopa Komisija, ter industrijski partnerji kot vodje „integriranih tehnoloških demonstratorjev“ (ITD) s pridruženimi člani ITD,
Acknowledges from the Court of Auditors’ report that the overall level of committed appropriations was close to 100 % for all titles;
D. ker je najvišji prispevek Unije k skupnemu podjetju za obdobje desetih let 800000000 EUR, ki se izplača iz proračuna sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave,