natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The environmental modelling and modelling simulations of the impacts of secondary treatment at both waste water treatment plants compared with primary treatment have not demonstrated that more advanced treatment will produce any tangible environmental benefits beyond this.
Okoljsko modeliranje in simulacije modeliranja vplivov sekundarnega čiščenja v obeh komunalnih čistilnih napravah v primerjavi s primarnim čiščenjem nista pokazala, da bi naprednejše čiščenje prineslo kakršne koli dodatne oprijemljive koristi za okolje.
In its decision of 19 December 2007 granting an Article 8(5) derogation to the Høvringen urban waste water treatment plant, the Authority stipulated that the application of chemical and/or biological treatment at the Høvringen urban waste water treatment plant would reduce to some degree the discharges of heavy metals and organic micro-pollutants.
V svoji odločitvi z dne 19. decembra 2007, s katero je bilo za komunalno čistilno napravo Høvringen odobreno odstopanje od člena 8(5), je Nadzorni organ določil, da bi uporaba kemičnega in/ali biološkega čiščenja v komunalni čistilni napravi Høvringen do določene mere zmanjšala izpuste težkih kovin in organskih mikroonesnaževal.
One of the conditions of that decision was that the treatment of urban waste water from the plant should ensure a reduction of total suspended solids in the incoming waste water by at least 80 % before discharge and that there be a minimum percentage reduction in biochemical oxygen demand [2] of 20 %.
Eden od pogojev za to odločitev je bil, da bi čiščenje komunalne odpadne vode iz čistilne naprave moralo zagotoviti zmanjšanje skupnih suspendiranih trdnih snovi v vtočni odpadni vodi pred izpustom za najmanj 80 % in da je najnižji odstotek zmanjšanja v biokemijski potrebi po kisiku [2] 20 %.
As such, the Authority concludes that the conditions set out in its original decision of 19 December 2007 to grant a derogation have not been met.
Član kolegija s posebno odgovornostjo za okoljske zadeve [3] je bil pooblaščen, da v imenu Nadzornega organa in pod njegovo odgovornostjo sprejme ukrepe, če je osnutek ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti, kot v obravnavanem primeru v skladu z mnenjem, ki ga je podal Odbor Efte za okolje, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu –
In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 18(2) of Directive 91/271/EC, and as further prescribed for in the Decisions of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 3/2012/SC and 4/2012/SC of 26 October 2012, the Authority submitted a draft of the present decision to the EFTA Environment Committee by letter of 8 December 2016.
Zahteva Norveške v skladu s členom 8(5) akta iz točke 13 Priloge XX k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Sveta 91/271/EGS z dne 21. maja 1991 o čiščenju komunalne odpadne vode), da se ji dovoli, da za komunalno čistilno napravo Ladehammeren v aglomeraciji Trondheim zagotovi manj strožje postopke čiščenja odpadne vode, kot je določeno v členu 4 navedenega akta, se sprejme pod pogoji iz odstavkov od 2 do 7 spodaj.
In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the Committee, the draft decision was deemed to have been approved on 26 January 2017.
Komunalna odpadna voda iz komunalne čistilne naprave Ladehammeren v aglomeraciji Trondheim se očisti pred izpustom v sprejemne vode najpozneje od 31. decembra 2017, kot je določeno v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
The College Member with special responsibility for environmental matters has been empowered [3], on behalf of the Authority and under its responsibility, to adopt the measures, if the draft measures to be adopted are, as in the present case, in accordance with the opinion delivered by the EFTA Environment Committee assisting the Authority.
opravljanja raziskovanja in spremljanja, da se ugotovijo morebitni viri kontaminacije in lokalni onesnaževalci,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
oblikovanja akcijskih načrtov za prekinitev kontaminacije iz virov kontaminacije in s strani lokalnih onesnaževalcev,
The urban waste water from the Ladehammeren waste water treatment plant in the agglomeration of Trondheim shall, prior to discharge in the receiving waters, be subject to the treatment set out in the Annex to this Decision no later than 31 December 2017.
Odločba Nadzornega organa z dne 19. decembra 2007 (725/07/COL), da se sprejme zahteva Norveške za odstopanje iz člena 8(5) Direktive 91/271/EGS, se prekliče.
A strategy to reduce the load of heavy metals and micro-pollutants to the sewage system and prevent further contamination of urban waste water by heavy metals and micro-pollutants shall be developed by 30 June 2017.
V skladu s členom 15(3) akta norveški pristojni organ spremlja in izvaja druge primerne raziskave, da se preveri, ali odpadna voda ne vpliva negativno na okolje.
The plan, which shall be monitored by the Norwegian competent authority shall include the obligation to:
Vsaki dve leti, z začetkom 31. januarja 2018, norveška vlada Nadzornemu organu predloži poročilo, ki vsebuje rezultate spremljanja, izvedenega v prejšnjem obdobju, v skladu z določbami odstavkov 3 in 4 zgoraj, zlasti v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so bili izvedeni za preprečevanje kontaminacije kanalizacijskega sistema za zbiranje s težkimi kovinami in mikroonesnaževali.
carry out surveys and monitoring to identify potential sources of contamination and local polluters;
Poročilo vsebuje tudi pojasnila o vsakršnem nespoštovanju zahtev iz te odločbe.
design action plans to terminate contamination from sources of contamination and local polluters;
Po vsakem obdobju poročanja iz odstavka 6 ali če pride do kakršnega koli novega razvoja, Nadzorni organ ponovno oceni stanje in po potrebi Odboru Efte za okolje, ki pomaga Nadzornemu organu, predloži predlog za novo odločbo.
apply countermeasures towards the polluters identified and to remove environmental pollutants at source.
Ta odločba se objavi v oddelku EGP in Dopolnilu EGP Uradnega lista Evropske unije.
The Authority's decision of 19 December 2007 (725/07/COL), to accept Norway's request for a derogation under Article 8(5) of Directive 91/271/EEC, is hereby revoked.
Ta odločba začne veljati, ko Norveška prejme uradno obvestilo.
Acting in accordance with Article 15(3) of the Act, the Norwegian competent authority shall monitor and carry out all other relevant studies to verify that the discharge does not adversely affect the environment.
Ta odločba je verodostojna v angleškem jeziku.
Every two years, commencing on 31 January 2018, the Norwegian Government shall provide the Authority with a report containing the results of the monitoring carried out during the previous period, according to the provisions of paragraphs 3 and 4 here above, in particular concerning the measures taken to prevent the contamination of the sewage collecting system by heavy metals and micro-pollutants.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Norveško.
The report shall also include explanations of any failure to meet the requirements of this Decision.
V Bruslju, 9. februarja 2017
Following each reporting period referred to in paragraph 6, or whenever new developments occur, the Authority shall re-evaluate the situation and shall, if necessary, submit a proposal for a new decision to the EFTA Environment Committee assisting the Authority.
Za Nadzorni organ Efte
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of the Official Journal of the European Union and in the EEA Supplement.
Član kolegija
The decision shall enter into force upon notification to Norway.
Direktor
This Decision shall be authentic in the English language.
UL L 135, 30.5.1991, str.
This Decision is addressed to Norway.
40.
Done at Brussels, 9 February 2017.
BPK 5 pri 20 °C
For the EFTA Surveillance Authority
Odločba št. 17/94/COL z dne 23. septembra 1994 (dokument št. 624326).
Director
Zahteve za odpadno vodo iz komunalne čistilne naprave Ladehammeren v aglomeraciji Trondheim
OJ L 135, 30.5.1991, p.
Kazalnik
40.
Možnost 1
BOD 5 at 20 °C.
Možnost 2
Decision No 17/94/COL of 23 September 1994 (Document No 624326).
Minimalni odstotek zmanjšanja [1]
ANNEX
Najvišje koncentracije v iztoku (mg/l)
Requirements for the discharge from the Ladehammeren urban waste water treatment plant in the agglomeration of Trondheim
Biokemijska potreba po kisiku (BPK 5 pri 20 °C) brez nitrifikacije
Parameter
Skupne suspendirane trdne snovi
Option 1
Znižanje v primerjavi s koncentracijo surovega (neočiščenega) pritoka
Option 2
Z analizo rezultatov za komunalno čistilno napravo Høvringen je Nadzorni organ ugotovil, da ti ne zadoščajo za zagotovitev skladnosti s pogoji, priloženimi odločitvi o odstopanju iz leta 2007.
Minimum Percentage Reduction [1]
Nadzorni organ tako ugotavlja, da pogoji, določeni v prvotni odločitvi z dne 19. decembra 2007 za dodelitev odstopanja, niso bili izpolnjeni.
Maximum Effluent Concentration (mg/l)
V skladu s postopkom iz člena 18(2) Direktive 91/271 in kot je nadalje predpisano v odločitvah Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 3/2012/SC in 4/2012/SC z dne 26. oktobra 2012, je Nadzorni organ Odboru Efte za okolje predložil osnutek te odločbe z dopisom z dne 8. decembra 2016.
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 at 20 °C) without nitrification
V skladu s poslovnikom Odbora šteje, da je bil osnutek odločbe sprejet 26. januarja 2017.
Total suspended solids
Strategija za zmanjšanje dotoka težkih kovin in mikroonesnaževal v kanalizacijski sistem in za preprečitev nadaljnjega onesnaženja komunalne odpadne vode s težkimi kovinami in mikroonesnaževali se razvije do 30. junija 2017.
Reduction in relation to the concentration of raw (untreated) influent.
Ta načrt, ki ga spremlja norveški pristojni organ, vključuje obveznost:
Having analysed the results provided in respect of the Høvringen urban waste water treatment plant, the Authority found that these are insufficient to ensure compliance with the conditions attached to the 2007 derogation decision.
Ni relevantno.
No 36/17/COL
št. 36/17/COL
regarding the lack of effective compliance with the Act referred to at point 66n of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC, as amended) and its implementing rules in respect of certificates issued by the Hellenic Aviation Training Academy (HATA), and Part-66 licenses issued on the basis thereof [2017/457]
o neučinkovitem izvajanju akta iz točke 66n Priloge XIII k Sporazumu o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (Uredba (ES) št. 216/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. februarja 2008 o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 91/670/EGS, Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 in Direktive 2004/36/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena) in njegovih izvedbenih predpisov glede potrdil, ki jih je izdala grška akademija za usposabljanje na področju letalstva (Hellenic Aviation Training Academy – HATA), in licenc po Delu 66, izdanih na podlagi teh potrdil [2017/457]
Having regard to the Act referred to at 66n of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’)
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 66n Priloge XIII k Sporazumu o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP),
Having regard to Article 5 of the Decision of the Standing Committee No 3/2012/SC of 26 October 2012 laying down procedures for committees assisting the EFTA Surveillance Authority in carrying out its functions under Article 3 of Protocol 1 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and of a Court of Justice,
ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
After consulting the EFTA Transport Committee,
Februarja 2014 je Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) pri grškem organu za civilno letalstvo (Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority – HCAA) izvedla inšpekcijski pregled standardiziranja na področju plovnosti (AIR.EL.02.2014).
Whereas:
V okviru tega pregleda je bila v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 628/2013 [2] ugotovljena neskladnost (ugotovitev razreda D), ki lahko vpliva na varnost, če se pravočasno ne odpravi.
In February 2014, the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘the Agency’) carried out an Airworthiness Standardisation inspection (AIR.EL.02.2014) to the Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority (HCAA).
Neskladnost je zadevala domnevno izpitno goljufijo pri organizaciji za usposabljanje za vzdrževanje (grška akademija za usposabljanje na področju letalstva (HATA)), ki je bila potrjena po Delu 147 s potrditveno številko EL.147.0007.
During this inspection, a non-conformity was identified raising safety concerns if not timely corrected (class D-finding), in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 628/2013 [2].
Varnostni pomisleki so bili izraženi zaradi možnosti, da je osebje za potrjevanje vzdrževanja zrakoplovov pridobilo licenco po Delu 66 na osnovi potrdil o priznanju, ki jih je izdala HATA v skladu s Prilogo III (Delom 66) k Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 1321/2014 [3], in sicer na podlagi domnevnih goljufivih dejavnosti, ter da izvaja privilegije in po vzdrževanju daje zrakoplove v obratovanje brez potrebnega osnovnega znanja o letalstvu.
The non-conformity concerned alleged examination fraud at the Part-147 maintenance training organisation, Hellenic Aviation Training Academy (HATA), with approval number EL.147.0007.
Dne 26. februarja 2014 je HCAA preklical potrditev HATA in obvestil pristojne organe vseh držav članic o možnosti lažnih potrdil o priznanju, ki jih je izdala HATA.
Safety concerns were raised due to the possibility that aircraft maintenance certifying staff have gained a Part-66 license based on Certificates of Recognition issued by HATA under Annex III (Part-66) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 [3], on the basis of alleged fraudulent activities, and are exercising privileges and releasing aircraft following maintenance without having the necessary aircraft basic knowledge.
Agencija in HCAA sta se 3. julija 2014 dogovorila o načrtu popravljalnih ukrepov, ki med drugim vključuje preiskave potrdil o priznanju, na podlagi katerih so pristojni organi držav članic izdali licence po Delu 66, in potrdil o priznanju, ki še niso bila uporabljena za izdajo licenc po Delu 66.
On 26 February 2014, the HCAA revoked the approval of HATA and informed all Member States' Competent Authorities of the possibility of fraudulent Certificates of Recognition issued by HATA.
Agencija je 9. decembra 2014 izdala bilten z informacijami o varnosti (št.
On 3 July 2014, the Agency and HCAA agreed a corrective action plan, including amongst others, investigations into Certificates of Recognition that have been used to issue Part-66 licences by Member States' Competent Authorities and Certificates of Recognition that have not yet been used to gain Part-66 licenses.
SIB: 2014-32), v katerem je obvestila o morebitnem tveganju za varnost, povezanem z domnevno izpitno goljufijo pri HATA, in pristojnim organom držav članic priporočila konkretne ukrepe za razrešitev te situacije.
On 9 December 2014, the Agency issued a Safety Information Bulletin (SIB No: 2014-32) informing about the potential safety concern associated with the alleged examination fraud at HATA and recommending concrete measures to the Member States' Competent Authorities in order to address this situation.
Aprila 2016 je Agencija pri HCAA izvedla še en inšpekcijski pregled standardiziranja.
In April 2016, the Agency carried out another Standardisation inspection of the HCAA.
V okviru tega pregleda je Agencija pregledala dogovorjeni načrt popravljalnih ukrepov in zaključila, da HCAA ni bil zmožen ustrezno izvesti dogovorjenih ukrepov pred dogovorjenimi roki.
During this inspection, the Agency reviewed the agreed corrective action plan and concluded that HCAA had not been able to adequately implement the agreed actions before the agreed due dates.
Agencija je zato maja 2016 v skladu s členom 22(3) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 628/2013 HCAA predložila dodatno poročilo.
Consequently, in May 2016, the Agency issued a Supplementary Report to the HCAA, in accordance with Article 22(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 628/2013.
Ker HCAA ni izvedel zadostnih preiskav HATA, da bi se razkrila domnevna goljufija, ki naj bi jo zakrivila ta organizacija, in ni v celoti preiskal licenc po Delu 66, ki so bile izdane na podlagi potrdil o priznanju, ki jih je izdala HATA, še vedno obstaja tveganje za varnost.
Since HCAA had not conducted sufficient investigations of HATA to detect the alleged fraud committed by this organisation and had not fully investigated Part-66 licences which have been issued on the basis of Certificates of Recognition issued by HATA, the potential safety concern remains.
Obstajajo tudi pomisleki glede potrdil o priznanju, ki jih je izdala HATA na podlagi izpitov za preverjanje osnovnega znanja o tehničnih modulih (moduli 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17).
There are concerns with regard to the Certificates of Recognition issued by HATA for basic knowledge exams on the technical modules (modules 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17).
Glede na navedeno je Agencija priporočila, da se člen 11(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 preneha uporabljati za potrdila o priznanju, ki jih je izdala HATA na podlagi izpitov za preverjanje osnovnega znanja o tehničnih modulih, in za licence po Delu 66, ki so jih pristojni organi držav članic izdali na podlagi teh potrdil o priznanju.
In light of all the above, the Agency recommended that Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 shall cease to apply to the Certificates of Recognition for basic knowledge examination on technical modules issued by HATA and to the Part-66 licences issued by the Member States' Competent Authorities on the basis of these Certificates of Recognition.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba od navedenih pristojnih organov zahtevati, da sprejmejo ustrezne popravljalne in zaščitne ukrepe za odpravo varnostnih tveganj.
In addition, those Competent Authorities shall be required to take appropriate corrective action and safeguard measures in order to address the safety risks.
Evropska komisija je 19. decembra 2016 odločila, da se s potrdili o priznanju, ki jih je izdala grška akademija za usposabljanje na področju letalstva (HATA) na podlagi izpitov za preverjanje osnovnega znanja o tehničnih modulih v skladu s točko 147.A.145(a)(4) in Dodatkom III Priloge IV (Dela 147) k Uredbi (EU) št. 1321/2014 in jih prosilec predloži kot spremno dokumentacijo za izdajo licence po Delu 66 s strani pristojnih organov v skladu s točko 66.B.100 Priloge III (Dela 66) k tej uredbi, Uredba (ES) št. 216/2008 ne izvaja učinkovito [4].
On 19 December 2016, the European Commission decided that Certificates of Recognition for basic knowledge examination on technical modules issued by the Hellenic Aviation Training Academy (HATA) pursuant to 147.A.145(a)(4) and Appendix III to Annex IV (Part-147) to Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014, which are submitted by an applicant as supporting documentation for the issue of a Part 66 licence by the Competent Authorities pursuant to 66.B.100 of Annex III (Part-66) to this Regulation do not effectively comply with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 [4].
Zaradi tega je Evropska komisija odločila tudi, da se z licencami za vzdrževanje zrakoplovov po Delu 66, ki jih izdajo pristojni organi držav članic EU v skladu s Prilogo III (Delom 66) k Uredbi (EU) št. 1321/2014 na podlagi potrdil o priznanju, ki jih je izdala HATA na podlagi izpitov za preverjanje osnovnega znanja o tehničnih modulih v skladu s točko 147.A.145(a)(4) in Dodatkom III Priloge IV (Dela 147) k navedeni uredbi, Uredba (ES) št. 216/2008 ne izvaja učinkovito.
As a consequence of this, the European Commission also decided that Part-66 aircraft maintenance licenses issued by the Competent Authorities of the EU Member States pursuant to Annex III (Part-66) to Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 on the basis of Certificates of Recognition for basic knowledge examination on technical modules issued by HATA pursuant to 147.A.145(a)(4) and Appendix III to Annex IV (Part-147) to that Regulation do not effectively comply with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008.
Zato je nujno, da Nadzorni organ Efte sprejme ustrezno odločbo glede licenc za vzdrževanje zrakoplovov po Delu 66, ki jih izdajo pristojni organi držav Efte, in da države Efte sprejmejo popravljalne ukrepe, da se glede na okoliščine zagotovi zahtevana raven varnosti.
It is therefore necessary that the EFTA Surveillance Authority adopts a corresponding decision as regards Part-66 aircraft maintenance licenses issued by the Competent Authorities of the EFTA States and that the EFTA States take corrective action ensuring the required level of safety under the circumstances.
V skladu s členom 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 je treba o odločitvi Nadzornega organa Efte v zvezi s priznavanjem zadevnih certifikatov ter o popravljalnih in zaščitnih ukrepih, ki jih morajo sprejeti pristojni organi, uradno obvestiti vse države Efte –
In accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, a decision by the EFTA Surveillance Authority regarding the recognition of the concerned certificates and on the corrective action and safeguard measures to be taken by the Competent Authorities needs to be notified to all EFTA States,
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Scope
Z naslednjimi dokumenti se Uredba (ES) št. 216/2008 in njeni izvedbeni predpisi ne izvajajo učinkovito:
The following does not effectively comply with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 and its implementing rules:
Licence za vzdrževanje zrakoplovov po Delu 66, ki jih izdajo pristojni organi v skladu s Prilogo III (Delom 66) k Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 1321/2014 na podlagi potrdil o priznanju, ki jih je izdala grška akademija za usposabljanje na področju letalstva na podlagi izpitov za preverjanje osnovnega znanja o tehničnih modulih v skladu s točko 147.A.145(a)(4) in Dodatkom III Priloge IV (Dela 147) k navedeni uredbi.
Part-66 aircraft maintenance licenses issued by the Competent Authorities pursuant to Annex III (Part-66) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 on the basis of Certificates of Recognition for basic knowledge examination on technical modules issued by the Hellenic Aviation Training Academy pursuant to 147.A.145(a)(4) and Appendix III to Annex IV (Part-147) to that Regulation.
Člen 2
Article 2
Popravljalni ukrepi
Corrective Actions
Pristojni organi držav Efte, ki so izdali licence po Delu 66 na podlagi potrdil o priznanju, ki jih je izdala HATA na podlagi izpitov za preverjanje osnovnega znanja o tehničnih modulih, v treh mesecih od dneva uradnega obvestila o tem sklepu izvedejo ponovno oceno vsake zadevne licence po Delu 66, pri čemer brez poseganja v ta sklep upoštevajo priporočila iz biltena z informacijami o varnosti (št.
The Competent Authorities of the EFTA States that have issued Part-66 licenses on the basis of Certificates of Recognition for basic knowledge examination on technical modules issued by HATA shall carry out within 3 months from the date of notification of this decision a reassessment of each Part-66 license concerned, taking into account, without prejudice to the present Decision, the recommendations laid down in Safety Information Bulletin EASA SIB No: 2014-32 issued by the Agency on 9 December 2014, at its latest revision.
EASA SIB: 2014-32), ki ga je Agencija izdala 9. decembra 2014 ob njegovi zadnji reviziji.
After the completion of this re-assessment, the Competent Authorities of the EFTA States shall:
Po zaključku ponovne ocene pristojni organi držav Efte:
where justified in view of Article 1, limit, suspend or revoke the Part-66 licence in accordance with 66.B.500 of Annex III (Part-66), as appropriate; and
po potrebi omejijo, začasno odvzamejo ali razveljavijo licenco po Delu 66 v skladu s točko 66.B.500 Priloge III (Dela 66), kadar je to upravičeno v skladu s členom 1; ter
in any event, provide the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the Agency with the results of the reassessment.
v vsakem primeru Nadzornemu organu Efte in Agenciji predložijo rezultate ponovne ocene.
This Decision is addressed to the EFTA States and shall enter into force on the day of its publication.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na države Efte in začne veljati na dan objave.