natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
No 773295) and invited Norway to either withdraw its notification or to submit additional supporting documents to the existing notification.
Zato Nadzorni organ meni, da je bila priglasitev ustrezno predložena šele od tega datuma, poleg tega začne od tega datuma teči rok šestih mesecev iz člena 4(4)(b) Akta.
By email dated 25 September 2015, Norway informed the Authority that additional documentation would be forwarded (Doc.
Norveška namerava v skladu s priglasitvijo spremeniti svojo nacionalno zakonodajo, da sprejme naslednjo izjemo:
No 774042).
„V uredbi št. 660 z dne 13. junija 2000 o gradnji, delovanju, opremi in nadzoru ribiških plovil, katerih skupna dolžina je 15 m (LOA) in več, § 3-2 (4) bo dodano naslednje besedilo za besedilom ‚trajno opremljeni‘:
On 23 November 2015, the Authority received the additional information submitted by the Norwegian Maritime Authority (Doc.
Plovila z globoko ohlajeno morsko vodo (RSW – Refrigerated Seawater) za skladiščenje in hlajenje ulova lahko uporabijo te cisterne za izpolnitev zahtev glede stabilnosti.
No 781516).
Ta plovila so opremljena s sistemom spremljanja natančne količine vode v vsaki cisterni z globoko ohlajeno morsko vodo.
Thus, it is only from this date that the Authority considers the notification to be duly submitted and, furthermore, it is from this date that the period of six months established by Article 4(4)(b) of the Act starts running.
Če je gladina vode nižja od minimalne zahteve v skladu z odobrenimi izračuni stabilnosti, je treba v krmarnici aktivirati zvočni in svetlobni alarmni signal.“
According to the Norwegian notification, Norway intends to amend its national legislation to adopt the following exemption:
Pravilo 2 (merila stabilnosti), točka 3 poglavja III Priloge I k Aktu določa, da je v plovilih, krajših od 45 m, balast trajen, in če je trajen, mora biti trden in varno pritrjen na plovilo.
‘In Regulations of 13 June 2000 No 660 concerning the construction, operation, equipment and surveys of fishing vessels 15 m in overall length (LOA) and over, § 3-2 (4), the following wording will be added after the wording “permanently arranged”:
Tekoči balast lahko organi držav EGP sprejmejo le, če je hranjen v popolnoma polnih cisternah, ki niso priključene na noben črpalni sistem plovila.
Vessels using refrigerated seawater (RSW) for storing and cooling the catch can use these tanks to fulfil the stability requirements.
V skladu z norveškim opisom izjeme, to ne drži.
These vessels shall be arranged with a system monitoring the exact amount of water in every RSW tank.
Člen 4(2) Akta določa, da države EGP izvajajo določbe pravila 3 odstavka 3 poglavja I Priloge k Torremolinoškemu protokolu za sprejetje ukrepov, ki vsebujejo izjeme, po postopku, določenem v odstavku 4 istega člena.
If the water level is below the minimum requirement according to the approved stability calculations, an alarm signal, both visual and audible, shall be activated in the wheelhouse.’
V skladu z odstavkom 3 pravila 3 plovila, za katera lahko velja izjema, opravljajo ribolov v bližini obale, medtem ko norveška priglasitev navaja, da ni tako („velik del ribiške flote je vključen v pelagični ribolov, daleč od pristanišč“).
Regulation 2 (Stability criteria), Paragraph 3 of Chapter III of Annex I of the Act stipulates that in vessels with a length of less than 45 m ballast shall be permanent, and where permanent, it shall be solid and fixed securely in the vessel.
Poleg tega v skladu tudi s pravilom 3 odstavka 3 poglavja I Priloge k Torremolinoškemu protokolu, v povezavi s členom 4(4) Akta, Norveška predloži dokaze v zvezi z nerazumno in neizvedljivo uporabo zahtev iz Torremolinoškega protokola glede na razdaljo območja plovbe plovila iz matičnega pristanišča v svoji državi, vrsto plovila, vremenske razmere in odsotnost splošnih nevarnosti za plovbo.
Liquid ballast may only be accepted by an administration of the EEA States, if it is stored in completely filled tanks which are not connected to any pumping system of the vessel.
Čeprav je Norveška navedla več argumentov, da bi upravičila izjemo, npr. „težja plovila in plovila z manj učinkovito porabo goriva, povečanim kotalnim obsegom, zmanjšanim radijem delovanja, zmanjšano nosilnostjo ter da lastniki ladij gradijo večje ladje, kot je potrebno“, in je tudi trdila, da pri ladjah, ki uporabljajo cisterne z globoko ohlajeno morsko vodo, ni bilo incidentov, so ti argumenti predvsem operativni in ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za izjeme, odobrene v skladu s pravilom 3 odstavka 3 poglavja I Priloge k Torremolinoškemu protokolu.
According to the Norwegian description of the exemption, that is not the case.
V okviru sodelovanja Nadzornega organa z Evropsko agencijo za pomorsko varnost (EMSA), ki je bila ustanovljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1406/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], je Nadzorni organ zaprosil za pomoč v zvezi s to priglasitvijo.Ocena EMSA z dne 8. oktobra 2015 (dok. št. 776081) ugotavlja, da je s tehničnega vidika Akt zelo poseben v smislu, da je balast trajen, in da pri izjemah uprave držav EGP lahko dovolijo le tekoči balast, hranjen v popolnoma napolnjenih cisternah, ki niso priključene na noben črpalni sistem plovila.
Article 4(2) of the Act states that EEA States shall apply the provisions of Regulation 3, Paragraph 3 of Chapter I of the Annex to the Torremolinos Protocol for adopting measures containing exemptions, subject to the procedure laid down in paragraph 4 of the same Article.
To pa ne velja za priglašeni ukrep.
Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Regulation 3, vessels that may be exempted shall engage in fishing near the coast, whilst the Norwegian notification indicates that this is not the case (‘a large part of the fishing fleet is involved in pelagic operations at great distances from the harbours’).
Poleg tega EMSA poudarja, da pravilo 3 odstavka 3 poglavja I Priloge k Torremolinoškemu protokolu velja za plovila, ki plujejo blizu obale, Norveška pa namerava uveljaviti izjemo za plovila, ki so vključena v „pelagični ribolov, daleč od pristanišč“.
Furthermore, as foreseen also by Regulation 3, Paragraph 3 of Chapter I of the Annex to the Torremolinos Protocol, read in conjunction with Article 4(4) of the Act, Norway shall provide evidence related to the unreasonable and impracticable application of the requirements of the Torremolinos Protocol in view of the distance of the vessel's operating area from its base port in its own country, the type of vessel, the weather conditions and the absence of general navigational hazards.
Ko je Norveška 23. novembra 2015 predložila manjkajoče informacije, je bila EMSA decembra 2015 ponovno kontaktirana, da posodobi svoj nasvet.
Even if Norway has put forward several arguments to justify the exemption such as ‘heavier and less fuel-efficient vessels, increased rolling motion, reduced radius of action, reduced loading capacity and shipowners building larger vessels than needed’ and has also alleged that there has been a lack of incidents in vessels using RSW tanks, these arguments are considered mainly as operational and do not seem to fulfil the requirements for exemptions granted in accordance with Regulation 3, Paragraph 3 of Chapter I of the Annex to the Torremolinos Protocol.
Zadnje priporočilo, ki ga je predložila EMSA, temelji na dodatnih informacijah, ki jih je posredovala Norveška, in popolnoma potrjuje operativno naravo priglašenih ukrepov, torej EMSA potrjuje, da njena ocena iz oktobra 2015 še vedno velja.
In framework of the Authority's cooperation with the European Maritime Safety Agency (‘EMSA’) established by Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2], the Authority requested assistance in respect of this notification.EMSA's assessment dated 8 October 2015 (Doc.
Nadzorni organ meni, da ukrep, ki ga je predložila Norveška, ne izpolnjuje materialnih zahtev za izjemo, kot je določeno v Aktu, ker (i) črpalni sistem, ki ga je predlagala Norveška, ni upravičen do izjeme v skladu z besedilom iz Akta, (ii) se plovila, za katera bi lahko potencialna izjema veljala, ne ukvarjajo z ribolovom v bližini obale in (iii) Norveška ni predložila dokazov, zakaj je uporaba Akta nerazumna in neizvedljiva.
No 776081), concludes that from a technical point of view, the Act is very specific in terms of ballast being permanent and that when it comes to exemptions, the administrations of the EEA States may only accept liquid ballast, stored in completely filled tanks which are not connected to any pumping system of the vessel.
Zato Nadzorni organ meni, da priglašena izjema ni upravičena.
This is not the case of the notified measure.
Nadzorni organ zato zahteva, da Norveška ne sprejme predlaganih ukrepov –
Moreover, EMSA outlines that Regulation 3, Paragraph 3 of Chapter I of the Annex to the Torremolinos Protocol applies to vessels sailing near the coast, whereas Norway intends to invoke the exemption for vessels engaged in ‘pelagic fishing operations at great distances from the harbours’.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJO ODLOČBO:
After the missing information was received from Norway on 23 November 2015, EMSA was contacted again in December 2015 to update its advice.
Predlagani ukrep, da plovila s hladilnimi bazeni z globoko ohlajeno morsko vodo izpolnjujejo zahteve stabilnosti, ki ga je Norveška priglasila 23. novembra 2015 v skladu s členom 4(2) Akta iz točke 56g poglavja V Priloge XIII k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva 97/70/ES), ni upravičen.
The latest advice from EMSA based on the additional information submitted by Norway fully confirms the operational nature of the notified measures and, hence, EMSA confirms that its assessment provided in October 2015 remains valid.
Norveška ne sprejme ukrepa, da plovila s cisternami z globoko ohlajeno morsko vodo izpolnjujejo zahteve stabilnosti, ki je bil priglašen 23. novembra 2015.
The Authority considers that the measure put forward by Norway does not fulfil the material requirements for exemption as required by the Act since (i) the pumping system suggested by Norway is not eligible for exemption according to the text of the Act; (ii) the vessels to which the potential exemption could be applicable to do not engage in fishing near the coast; and (iii) Norway has not provided evidence as to why the application of the Act is unreasonable and impracticable.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Norveško.
Thus, the Authority is of the opinion that the notified exemption is not justified.
V Bruslju, 11. maja 2016
Consequently, the Authority requires that Norway does not adopt the proposed measures,
Za Nadzorni organ Efte
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Članica kolegija
The proposed measure regarding vessels using refrigerated seawater tanks to fulfil stability requirements notified by Norway on 23 November 2015, pursuant to Article 4(2) of the Act referred to at point 56g in Chapter V of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement (Directive 97/70/EC) is not justified.
Direktor
Norway shall not adopt the measure regarding vessels using refrigerated seawater tanks to fulfil stability requirements notified on 23 November 2015.
UL L 34, 9.2.1998, str.
This Decision is addressed to Norway.
1.
No 138/16/COL
št. 138/16/COL
authorising Iceland to derogate from Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council with respect to the existing provisions regarding the issuance of certificates of airworthiness for imported aircraft [2016/2013]
o odobritvi odstopanja Islandije od Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z veljavnimi določbami o izdaji spričeval o plovnosti za uvožen z oplov [2016/2013]
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY,
NADZORNI ORGAN EFTE JE –
Having regard to the Act referred to at point 66n of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement,
ob upoštevanju akta iz točke 66n Priloge XIII k Sporazumu EGP,
Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC [1], as amended (‘the Act’),
Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. februarja 2008 o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 91/670/EGS, Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 in Direktive 2004/36/ES [1], kakor je bila spremenjena (v nadaljnjem besedilu: akt),
as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, and in particular Article 14(6) and (7) of the Act,
kakor je bil prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu, in zlasti člena 14(6) in (7) akta,
Having regard to the opinion of the EFTA Transport Committee delivered on 10 June 2016,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora Efte za promet z dne 10. junija 2016,
Having regard to Decision 103/13/COL of the EFTA Surveillance Authority (‘the Authority’) of 13 March 2013 empowering the College Member with special responsibility for transport to take certain decisions and measures (Doc No 578349).
ob upoštevanju Odločbe št. 103/13/COL Nadzornega organa Efte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nadzorni organ) z dne 13. marca 2013 o pooblastitvi člana kolegija s posebno odgovornostjo za promet, da sprejme nekatere odločitve in ukrepe (dok. št. 578349),
Iceland notified the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘the Agency’) by letter dated 25 February 2016 (Doc No 794710), of its intention to derogate from point 21.A.174(b)3(ii) of Annex I (Part 21) of the act referred to at point 66p of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 of 3 August 2012 laying down implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organisations [2], as amended) (‘Regulation (EU) No 748/2012’) as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto.
Islandija je nadzorni organ Efte in Evropsko agencijo za varnost v letalstvu z dopisom z dne 25. februarja 2016 (dok. št. 794710) obvestila o svoji nameri o odstopanju od točke 21.A.174(b)3(ii) Priloge I (del 21) k aktu iz točke 66p Priloge XIII k Sporazumu EGP (Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 748/2012 z dne 3. avgusta 2012 o določitvi izvedbenih določb za certificiranje zrakoplovov in sorodnih proizvodov, delov in naprav glede plovnosti in okoljske ustreznosti ter potrjevanje projektivnih in proizvodnih organizacij [2], kakor je bila spremenjena) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba (EU) št. 748/2012), kakor je bil prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu.
In accordance with point 21.A.174(b)3(ii) of Annex I (Part 21) to Regulation (EU) No 748/2012, each application for a certificate of airworthiness for an aircraft imported from a third country, shall include a statement by the competent authority of the State where the aircraft is or was registered, reflecting the airworthiness status of the aircraft on its register at the time of transfer.
V skladu s točko 21A.174(b)3(ii) Priloge I (del 21) k Uredbi (EU) št. 748/2012 morajo vloge za spričevalo o plovnosti pri zrakoplovih, uvoženih iz tretje države, vključevati izjavo pristojnega organa države, v kateri je zrakoplov registriran ali je bil registriran, o statusu plovnosti zrakoplova v njegovem registru ob predaji.
However, in some cases such a statement is not available and cannot be obtained.
Vendar v nekaterih primerih takšna izjava ni na voljo in je ni mogoče pridobiti.
Iceland's intention is thus to waive the requirement to include such a statement.
Zato je namera Islandije, da opusti zahtevo po vključitvi takšne izjave.
In its decision of 6 February 2014 the European Commission authorised Sweden to derogate from the point of 21.A.174(b)3(ii) of Annex I (Part 21) to Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 and to waive the requirement to include such a statement [3].That derogation applies until amendment to resolve this issue, as part of the rulemaking task RMT.0020, of Subpart H (Certificate of Airworthiness and Restricted Certificate of Airworthiness) of Annex I (Part 21) to Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 is adopted and becomes applicable.
Evropska komisija je v svojem sklepu z dne 6. februarja 2014 Švedski odobrila odstopanje od točke 21.A.174(b)3(ii) Priloge I (del 21) k Uredbi (EU) št. 748/2012 in opustitev zahteve po vključitvi takšne izjave [3].To odstopanje se uporablja, dokler ni sprejeta in ne začne veljati sprememba poddela H (Spričevalo o plovnosti in spričevala o plovnosti z omejitvami) Priloge I (dela 21) k Uredbi (EU) št. 748/2012, in sicer za rešitev tega vprašanja v okviru naloge oblikovanja predpisov RMT.0020.
The rulemaking task, RMT.0020, has now been merged with another rulemaking task, RMT.0278 (Importing of aircraft from other regulatory system, and Part 21 Subpart H review) and a notice of proposed rulemaking is currently in its final stages of adoption by the European Aviation Safety Agency.
Naloga oblikovanja predpisov RMT.0020 je bila zdaj združena z drugo nalogo oblikovanja predpisov, tj. RMT.0278 (uvoz zrakoplovov iz drugih regulativnih sistemov in pregled poddela H dela 21), obvestilo o predlaganem oblikovanju predpisov pa je trenutno v zaključni fazi sprejetja s strani Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu.
Based on the above, the Authority has concluded that the notified Icelandic derogation fulfils the requirements laid down in Article 14(6) and (7) of the Act.
Nadzorni organ je na podlagi navedenega sklenil, da odstopanje, ki ga je priglasila Islandija, izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 14(6) in (7) akta.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Transport Committee,
Ukrepi iz te odločbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora Efte za promet –
Iceland may derogate from point 21.A.174(b)3(ii) of Annex I (Part 21) to the act referred to at point 66p of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 of 3 August 2012 laying down implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organisations, as amended) (‘Regulation (EU) No 748/2012’) as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto and accept applications for a certificate of airworthiness, for aircraft imported from a third country, without a statement by the competent authority of the State where the aircraft is or was registered, reflecting the airworthiness status of the aircraft on its register at the time of transfer.
Islandija lahko odstopa od točke 21.A.174(b)3(ii) Priloge I (del 21) k aktu iz točke 66p Priloge XIII k Sporazumu EGP (Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 748/2012 z dne 3. avgusta 2012 o določitvi izvedbenih določb za certificiranje zrakoplovov in sorodnih proizvodov, delov in naprav glede plovnosti in okoljske ustreznosti ter potrjevanje projektivnih in proizvodnih organizacij, kakor je bila spremenjena) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba (EU) št. 748/2012), kakor je bil prilagojen Sporazumu EGP s Protokolom 1 k Sporazumu, in sprejema vloge za spričevalo o plovnosti pri zrakoplovih, uvoženih iz tretje države, brez izjave pristojnega organa države, v kateri je zrakoplov registriran ali je bil registriran, o statusu plovnosti zrakoplova v njegovem registru ob predaji.
This derogation shall apply until an amendment to resolve this issue, as part of the rulemaking task RMT.0278, of Subpart H (Certificate of Airworthiness and Restricted Certificates of Airworthiness) of Annex I (Part 21) to Regulation (EU) No 748/2012, is adopted and becomes applicable to the EFTA States.
To odstopanje se uporablja, dokler ni sprejeta in ne začne za države Efte veljati sprememba poddela H (Spričevalo o plovnosti in spričevala o plovnosti z omejitvami) Priloge I (dela 21) k Uredbi (EU) št. 748/2012, in sicer za rešitev tega vprašanja v okviru naloge oblikovanja predpisov RMT.0278.
All EFTA States shall be entitled to apply the same measures referred to in Article 1, subject to the conditions stated in the Annex to this Decision, and subject to the notification obligation set out Article 14(6) of the Act.
Vse države Efte so upravičene do uporabe istih ukrepov iz člena 1, pri čemer zanje veljajo pogoji iz Priloge k tej odločbi in obveznost obveščanja iz člena 14(6) akta.
The Decision is addressed to Iceland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Islandijo.
This Decision shall be notified to Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein.
O tej odločbi se uradno obvestijo Norveška, Islandija in Lihtenštajn.
Done at Brussels, 28 June 2016.
V Bruslju, 28. junija 2016
Director
Direktorica
OJ L 79, 19.3.2008, p. 1.
UL L 79, 19.3.2008, str.
OJ L 224, 21.8.2012, p. 1.
1.
Annex VI of Commission Decision 2014/69/EU of 6 February 2014 authorising Sweden and the United Kingdom to derogate from certain common aviation safety rules pursuant to Article 14(6) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 39, 8.2.2014, p. 60).
UL L 224, 21.8.2012, str.
CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION OF THE DEROGATION
Priloga VI k Sklepu Komisije 2014/69/EU z dne 6. februarja 2014 o pooblastitvi Švedske in Združenega kraljestva, da odstopata od nekaterih skupnih predpisov za letalsko varnost v skladu s členom 14(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 39, 8.2.2014, str. 60).
The competent authority shall examine the aircraft documentation and inspect the aircraft to verify that:
PRILOGA
the historical records of the aircraft are complete and sufficient to establish the production and modification standard,
POGOJI ZA UPORABO ODSTOPANJA
the aircraft was produced in accordance with the type design that was the basis for the EASA type certificate.
Pristojni organ prouči dokumentacijo o zrakoplovu in pregleda zrakoplov, da preveri, ali:
For that purpose the historical records shall include a copy of the first certificate of airworthiness or export certificate issued for the new aircraft.
je pretekla evidenca zrakoplova popolna in zadošča za ugotavljanje standarda proizvodnje in sprememb,
Alternatively the applicant for the certificate of airworthiness can obtain a statement from the type certificate holder endorsed by the State of Design regarding the production status,
je bil zrakoplov proizveden v skladu s projektom tipa, ki je bil osnova za certifikat tipa EASA.
the aircraft conforms to a type design approved under a type certificate,
V ta namen je pretekli evidenci priložen izvod prvega spričevala o plovnosti ali izvoznega potrdila, izdanega za nov zrakoplov.
any supplemental type certificate, change or repairs are approved in accordance with Annex I (Part 21) to Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 [1],the applicable airworthiness directives have been implemented.
Namesto tega lahko prosilec za spričevalo o plovnosti pridobi izjavo nosilca certifikata tipa, ki ga je v zvezi s statusom proizvodnje potrdila država projektiranja,
The act referred to at point 66p of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 of 3 August 2012 laying down implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organisations, as amended) as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto.
je zrakoplov v skladu s projektom tipa, odobrenim po certifikatu tipa,
The act referred to at point 66q of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 of 26 November 2014 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks, as amended (OJ L 362, 17.12.2014, p.
so morebitni dodatni certifikati tipa, sprememba ali popravila odobreni v skladu s Prilogo I (delom 21) k Uredbi (EU) št. 748/2012 [1],so bile izvedene ustrezne plovnostne zahteve.
No 139/16/COL
št. 139/16/COL
authorising Norway to derogate from Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council with respect to flight time limitation provisions for the air operator Widerøes Flyselskap AS [2016/2014]
o odobritvi odstopanja Norveške od Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z določbami o omejitvi trajanja poleta za letalskega prevoznika Widerøes Flyveselskap AS [2016/2014]