natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In a communication of 24 August 2012, the Norwegian Government informed the Authority of its withdrawal of Article 21 of the Norwegian Regulation (pyrotechnic emergency equipment) from the request for derogations.
Norveška vlada je s sporočilom z dne 24. avgusta 2012 Nadzorni organ obvestila o umiku člena 21 norveške uredbe (pirotehnična oprema v izrednih primerih) iz zahteve za odstopanje.
In accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2008/68 and Standing Committee Decisions No 3/12/SC and 4/12/SC, the Authority submitted, on 5 October 2012, a first draft of measures to be taken to the EFTA Transport Committee (hereinafter ‘the Committee’, Events No 648711 and 643174).
V skladu s členom 9 Direktive 2008/68/ES in sklepi Stalnega odbora št. 3/12/SC in št. 4/12/SC je Nadzorni organ 5. oktobra 2012 predložil prvi osnutek ukrepov, ki jih mora sprejeti odbor za promet Efte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odbor, dogodka št. 648711 in št. 643174).
These draft measures were based on a risk assessment report dated 14 June 2012 as commissioned by the Authority from Det Norske Veritas (DNV) (Event No 640432).
Ta osnutek ukrepov temelji na poročilu o oceni tveganja z dne 14. junija 2012, ki jo je Nadzorni organ naročil pri Det Norske Veritas (DNV) (dogodek št. 640432).
On 8 November 2012, the Committee convened and discussed the first draft measures (Event No 652659, minutes from the meeting).
Odbor se je sestal 8. novembra 2012 in razpravljal o prvem osnutku ukrepov (dogodek št. 652659, zapisnik s sestanka).
By a letter of 26 November 2012 (Event No 654691), the Norwegian Government withdrew Articles 13 (airport tank-vehicle), 16 (safety valve) and 28 (EX/II/III Transport units) from its request for derogations, while maintaining its request for derogation as regards Article 12 (transport of hazardous waste).
Norveška vlada je z dopisom z dne 26. novembra 2012 (dogodek št. 654691) iz svoje zahteve za odstopanje umaknila člene 13 (letališka vozila s cisternami), 16 (varnostni ventil) in 28 (EX/II/III prevozne enote), hkrati pa vztrajala pri zahtevi za odstopanje v zvezi s členom 12 (prevoz nevarnih odpadkov).
Accordingly, the remaining derogation requested under Article 6(2)(a) of the Act concerns Article 12 of the Norwegian Regulation authorising transport of hazardous waste in Norway.
Zato se preostalo odstopanje, ki je bilo zahtevano na podlagi člena 6(2)(a) akta, nanaša na člen 12 norveške uredbe, ki dovoljuje prevoz nevarnih odpadkov na Norveškem.
That provision reads as follows:
V tem členu je navedeno:
‘Article 12 - Transportation of hazardous waste
„Člen 12 – Prevoz nevarnih odpadkov
When transporting up to 500 kg net dangerous goods per transport unit/railway wagon, classified as hazardous waste according to waste regulations, only the ADR and RID requirements for packaging, tanks, marking, mixed packing and transport documents applies.
Pri prevozu do 500 kg neto nevarnega blaga na prevozno enoto/železniški vagon, ki je v skladu s predpisi o odpadkih klasificirano kot nevarni odpadek, se v zvezi s pakiranjem, cisternami, označevanjem, kombiniranim pakiranjem in prevoznimi listinami uporabljajo samo pravilniki o prevozu nevarnega blaga po cesti in železniškem prevozu nevarnega blaga.
When collecting liquid waste delivered in cans, boxes, etc. outer packaging as UN-approved drums, rigid IBC or large packaging may be used.
Pri zbiranju tekočih odpadkov v pločevinkah, škatlah itd. se smejo kot zunanje pakiranje uporabiti sodi, ki so jih odobrili ZN, trpežni vsebniki IBC ali velika pakiranja.
Remnants of glue, paint, resin solutions or similar substances in packaging of up to 10 liters, may be transported on pallets with pallet collars, if it is adequately secured against leakage.
Ostanki lepila, barve, smolne raztopine ali podobne snovi v pakiranju do 10 litrov se smejo prevažati na paletah s prirobnicami, če so ustrezno zavarovane proti iztekanju.
Hazardous wastes from households can be transported in special boxes with secured lids.
Nevarni odpadki iz gospodinjstev se smejo prevažati v posebnih škatlah s pritrjenimi pokrovi.
Such boxes may be marked “Hazardous Waste”.
Take škatle se lahko označijo z napisom „nevarni odpadki“.
The requirements in ADR/RID on mixed packing does not have to be met if sufficient measures is taken to prevent dangerous reactions.
Zahtev v zvezi s kombiniranim pakiranjem iz pravilnika o prevozu nevarnega blaga po cesti in železniškem prevozu nevarnega blaga ni treba izpolniti, če so sprejeti zadostni ukrepi za preprečevanje nevarnih reakcij.
Declaration form in accordance with waste regulations may be used as a transport document.’
Kot prevozna listina se lahko v skladu s predpisi o odpadkih uporabi obrazec izjave.“
In that regard, the draft measures submitted to the Committee on 5 October 2012 read:
V zvezi s tem je v osnutku ukrepov, ki so bili odboru predloženi 5. oktobra 2012, navedeno:
he request for derogation in relation to Article 12 of the Norwegian Regulation concerning the transportation of hazardous waste, should be accepted in so far as the transportation company has an ADR safety adviser, and where the drivers have extended driver’s licence, class C or class D. For the remainder, it should be rejected.’
ahtevo za odstopanje v zvezi s členom 12 norveške uredbe o prevozu nevarnih odpadkov je treba sprejeti, v kolikor ima prevozno podjetje svetovalca za varnost pri prevozu nevarnega blaga po cesti in v kolikor imajo vozniki podaljšano vozniško dovoljenje kategorij C ali D. V vseh drugih primerih ga je treba zavrniti.“
In its letter of 26 November 2012, the Norwegian Government indicated the following:
Norveška vlada je v svojem dopisu z dne 26. novembra 2012 navedla naslednje:
‘Article 12 Transport of hazardous waste
„Člen 12 – Prevoz nevarnih odpadkov
The Norwegian Government maintains its request to the Authority for a national derogation in relation to this Article, with some adjustments.
Norveška vlada z nekaterimi spremembami vztraja pri svoji zahtevi za nacionalno odstopanje v zvezi s tem členom, ki jo je poslala Nadzornemu organu.
Norway would like to point out that extended drivers licence for the drivers of the vehicles (class C or D) is not relevant for the safety of the transport of dangerous goods.
Norveška želi poudariti, da podaljšanje vozniškega dovoljenja za voznike vozil (kategorija C ali D) ni pomembno za varnost pri prevozu nevarnega blaga. Odstopanje se bo nanašalo le na prevoz nevarnega blaga po cesti.
People that handles and transports hazardous waste must attend special training before they can be authorized.’
Osebe, ki ravnajo z nevarnimi odpadki ali jih prevažajo, se morajo udeležiti posebnega usposabljanja, preden so za to pooblaščene.“
Following a request from the Authority, the Norwegian Government provided the following clarification by email of 13 December 2012 (Event No 656664) as regards its proposed amendments:
Na zahtevo Nadzornega organa je norveška vlada po elektronski pošti z dne 13. decembra 2012 (dogodek št. 656664) predložila naslednje pojasnilo v zvezi s predlaganimi spremembami:
‘This alternative proposal, concerning the training requirements, will be limited to road transport only, and implies that drivers of vehicles carrying waste dangerous goods shall be trained in:
„Ta alternativni predlog, ki se nanaša na zahteve v zvezi z usposabljanjem, bo omejen le na prevoz po cesti in pomeni, da se vozniki vozil, ki prevažajo odpadke nevarnega blaga, usposobijo v zvezi z naslednjim:
General requirements governing the carriage of waste dangerous goods
splošnimi zahtevami v zvezi s prevozom odpadkov nevarnega blaga,
Main types of hazards, including their marking and labeling
glavnimi vrstami tveganj, vključno z označevanjem in etiketiranjem,
Preventive and safety measures appropriate to the various types of hazard
preventivnimi in varnostnimi ukrepi, ki ustrezajo različnim vrstam tveganj,
Safe loading, unloading, and carriage of waste dangerous goods
varnim nakladanjem, razkladanjem in prevozom odpadkov nevarnega blaga,
Purpose and the method of operation of technical equipment on vehicles
namenom tehnične opreme v vozilih in načinom njenega delovanja,
Basic information for minimizing the likelihood of an incident taking place
osnovnimi informacijami za zmanjševanje verjetnosti nezgod,
Emergency response procedures, including the measures which may prove necessary for their own safety and that of the public and the environment in case of an incident
postopki za ukrepanje v izrednih razmerah, vključno z ukrepi, ki se lahko izkažejo kot potrebni za njihovo lastno in javno varnost ter zaščito okolja v primeru nezgode,
Security awareness
ozaveščanjem o varnosti.
Records of the driver training received shall be kept by the employer and made available to the driver or competent authority, upon request.
Evidence o usposabljanju voznika hrani delodajalec in so na zahtevo na voljo vozniku ali pristojnemu organu.
The exact wording of the revised § 12 is not yet fully prepared, but the proposal contains the substance of the revised Regulation.’
Natančno besedilo spremenjenega člena 12 še ni popolnoma pripravljeno, vendar predlog vsebuje vsebino spremenjene uredbe.“
On 16 January 2013 (Event 659861), DNV submitted that, in its view, the measures suggested by the Norwegian Government on special training for drivers would be more to the purpose than DNV’s original proposal of a class C or a class D driver’s licence.
Organ DNV je 16. januarja 2013 (dogodek št. 659861) navedel, da bi bili po njegovem mnenju ukrepi, ki jih je v zvezi s posebnim usposabljanjem voznikov predlagala norveška vlada, ustreznejši od njegovega prvotnega predloga glede vozniškega dovoljenja kategorij C ali D.
On 18 January 2013 and on 1 February 2013 (Events No 659983 and No 661423), the Norwegian Government further amended its proposal on training requirements in the following terms:
Norveška vlada je 18. januarja 2013 in 1. februarja 2013 (dogodka št. 659983 in št. 661423) nadalje spremenila svoj predlog v zvezi z zahtevami za usposabljanje na naslednjih področjih:
‘The regulations governing the transport of dangerous goods in road tunnels and the appropriate mitigation measures and emergency response actions for such transport.’
„Predpisi, ki urejajo prevoz nevarnega blaga v cestnih predorih ter ustrezni blažilni ukrepi in dejavnosti za ukrepanje v izrednih razmerah pri takem prevozu.“
‘The duration of the training shall be a minimum of 6 teaching units. Records of the driver training received shall be kept by the employer and made available to the driver or competent authority, upon request.’
„Trajanje usposabljanja mora znašati najmanj 6 učnih ur. Evidence o usposabljanju voznika hrani delodajalec in so na zahtevo na voljo vozniku ali pristojnemu organu.“
On 27 February 2013, the Authority decided to submit to the Committee accordingly amended draft measures to be taken by the Authority with regard to Norway’s remaining request for a derogation based on Article 6(2)(a) of the Act concerning the transport of hazardous waste (Decision No 88/13/COL); and to empowering the competent College Member to adopt the final decision if the Committee approves of the draft measures unanimously.
Nadzorni organ se je 27. februarja 2013 odločil, da odboru predloži ustrezno spremenjeni osnutek ukrepov, ki jih mora Nadzorni organ sprejeti v zvezi s preostalo norveško zahtevo za odstopanje na podlagi člena 6(2)(a) akta o prevozu nevarnih odpadkov (Sklep št. 88/13/COL), in pooblastilom pristojnega člana kolegija, da sprejme končno odločitev, če odbor osnutek ukrepov soglasno potrdi.
By e-mails of 1 and 13 March 2013, respectively, the Members of the EFTA Transport Committee unanimously approved of these draft measures (Events No 666005, 665893 and 664435).
Člani odbora Efte za promet so z elektronsko pošto z dne 1. oziroma 13. marca 2013 soglasno potrdili osnutek teh ukrepov (dogodki št. 666005, št. 665893 in št. 664435).
Accordingly, the Authority can grant Norway’s remaining request for a derogation based on Article 6(2)(a) of the Act.
V skladu s tem lahko Nadzorni organ odobri preostalo norveško zahtevo za odstopanje na podlagi člena 6(2)(a) akta –
The request for a derogation, constituting of Article 12 of the Norwegian Regulation on the transport of hazardous waste, based on Article 6(2)(a) of the Act stipulating that ‘Provided that safety is not compromised, Member States may request derogations from Annex I, Section I.1…’ namely the Annex containing The European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (the ADR Agreement), should be accepted in so far as the transport company has an ADR safety adviser, and in so far as people who handle and transport hazardous waste attend special training before they are authorized to do so.
Zahteva za odstopanje, ki jo sestavlja člen 12 norveške uredbe o prevozu nevarnih odpadkov, temelji na členu 6(2)(a) akta, v katerem je navedeno, da „lahko države članice, pod pogojem, da varnost ni ogrožena, zahtevajo odstopanja od oddelka I.1 Priloge I (…)“, tj. priloge, ki vsebuje Evropski sporazum o mednarodnem prevozu nevarnega blaga po cesti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporazum ADR), se sprejme, v kolikor ima prevozno podjetje svetovalca za varnost pri prevozu nevarnega blaga po cesti in v kolikor se osebe, ki ravnajo z nevarnimi odpadki in jih prevažajo, udeležijo posebnega usposabljanja, preden so za to pooblaščene [1].
Drivers of vehicles carrying dangerous goods waste shall be trained in:
Voznike vozil, ki prevažajo odpadke nevarnega blaga, je treba usposobiti v zvezi z naslednjim:
The purpose and method of operation of technical equipment on vehicles
namenom tehnične opreme v vozilih in načinom njenega delovanja,
Emergency response procedures, including measures which may prove necessary for their own safety and that of the public and the environment in case of an incident
postopki za ukrepanje v izrednih razmerah, vključno z ukrepi, ki se lahko izkažejo kot potrebni za njihovo lastno in javno varnost ter zaščito okolja v primeru nezgode,
Regulations governing the transport of dangerous goods in road tunnels and the appropriate mitigation measures and emergency response actions for such transport.
predpisi, ki urejajo prevoz nevarnega blaga v cestnih predorih ter ustreznimi blažilnimi ukrepi in dejavnostmi za ukrepanje v izrednih razmerah pri takem prevozu,
The duration of the training shall be a minimum of 6 teaching units.
Trajanje usposabljanja mora znašati najmanj 6 učnih enot.
The derogation set out in Article 1 of this Decision shall expire on 26 September 2015
Odstopanje iz člena 1 te odločbe preneha veljati 26. septembra 2015.
The derogation set out in Article 1 of this Decision shall be published in the EEA section of the Official Journal of the European Union and in the EEA Supplement thereof according to point 6 of Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement.
V skladu s točko 6 Protokola št. 1 k Sporazumu EGP se odstopanje iz člena 1 te odločbe objavi v sklopu EGP in v Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Norway and shall enter into force upon notification to that State.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Kraljevino Norveško in začne veljati, ko slednja prejme uradno obvestilo.
Article 12 does only apply to road transport.
Člen 12 se uporablja samo pri prevozu po cesti.
The derogation will comprehend ADR only. Further on, the companies must have a ADR/RID safety adviser.
Poleg tega morajo podjetja imeti svetovalca za varnost pri prevozu nevarnega blaga po cesti in/ali železniškem prevozu nevarnega blaga.
No 258/13/COL
št. 258/13/COL
to close the formal investigation procedure into the sale of Narvik municipality’s entitlement to concession power to Narvik Energi AS (‘NEAS’) (Norway)
o zaključku formalnega postopka preiskave o prodaji pravice občine Narvik do električne energije po znižani ceni družbi Narvik Energi AS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba NEAS) (Norveška)
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY (‘the Authority’),
NADZORNI ORGAN EFTE (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Nadzorni organ) JE –
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), in particular to Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) ter zlasti členov od 61 do 63 in Protokola 26,
HAVING REGARD to Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement (‘Protocol 3’), in particular to Articles, 7(2) and 13(1) of Part II,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol 3), zlasti členov 7(2) ter 13(1) dela II,
HAVING called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions [1], and having regard to their comments,
PO POZIVU vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter dated 7 January 2009, a complaint was filed against Narvik municipality (‘Narvik’) regarding the sale of Narvik’s entitlement to concession power to Narvik Energi AS (‘NEAS’).
Z dopisom z dne 7. januarja 2009 je bila vložena pritožba proti občini Narvik (v nadaljnjem besedilu: občina Narvik ali občina) v zvezi s prodajo pravice občine Narvik do električne energije po znižani ceni družbi Narvik Energi AS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba NEAS).
The letter was received and registered by the Authority on 14 January 2009 [2].
Nadzorni organ je dopis prejel in evidentiral 14. januarja 2009 [2].
By letter dated 16 July 2009 [3], the Authority requested additional information from the Norwegian authorities.
Nadzorni organ je z dopisom z dne 16. julija 2009 [3] od norveških organov zahteval dodatne informacije.
By letter dated 2 October 2009 [4], the Norwegian authorities replied to the information request.
Norveški organi so v dopisu z dne 2. oktobra 2009 [4] poslali zahtevane informacije.
On 14 December 2011, the Authority initiated the procedure provided for in Article 1(2) of Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement by adopting Decision No 393/11/COL (‘Decision 393/11/COL’).
Nadzorni organ je s sprejetjem Odločbe št. 393/11/COL (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Odločba 393/11/COL) 14. decembra 2011 začel postopek na podlagi člena 1(2) dela I Protokola 3 Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
By letter dated 23 February 2012 [5], the Norwegian authorities provided comments to the Decision.
Norveški organi so v dopisu z dne 23. februarja 2012 [5] predložili pripombe k Odločbi.
On 26 April 2012, the Decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union and in the EEA Supplement to it [6].
Odločba je bila dne 26. aprila 2012 objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in v Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu [6].
By email of 25 May 2012 [7], the Authority received comments from an interested party.
Nadzorni organ je v elektronskem sporočilu z dne 25. maja 2012 [7] prejel pripombe zainteresirane strani.
By email of 28 June 2012 [8], the Authority forwarded these to the Norwegian authorities.
Nadzorni organ je z elektronskim sporočilom z dne 28. junija 2012 [8] te pripombe posredoval norveškim organom.
By letter dated 30 November 2012 [9], the Norwegian authorities submitted further information.
Norveški organi so v dopisu z dne 30. novembra 2012 [9] predložili nadaljnje informacije.
The complainant alleges that Narvik by entering into a contract with NEAS for the sale of 128 GWh of annual concession power for a period of 50,5 years, has sold its rights to buy the concession power significantly below the market price and thereby granted illegal state aid to NEAS.
Pritožnik trdi, da je občina Narvik s podpisom pogodbe z družbo NEAS o prodaji 128 GWh električne energije po letni znižani ceni v obdobju 50,5 let prodala svoje pravice za nakup električne energije po ceni, ki je precej pod tržno, zato je družba NEAS pridobila nezakonito državno pomoč.
The complainant further alleges that the decision to enter into the contract was adopted by Narvik Municipal Council on the basis of incorrect and/or incomplete information.
Pritožnik še trdi, da je občinski svet občine Narvik sprejel odločitev o sklenitvi pogodbe na podlagi nepravilnih in/ali nepopolnih informacij.
Allegedly expert reports critical of the duration of the contract and the inherent difficulty in establishing a market price for electricity were not disclosed to the Municipal Council prior to taking the decision to enter into the contract.
Preden je občinski svet sprejel odločitev o sklenitvi pogodbe, mu domnevno niso bila razkrita strokovna poročila, ki so kritična do trajanja pogodbe, prav tako pa mu domnevno ni bilo razkrito, da je določanje tržne cene elektrike težavno.
The Norwegian concession power regime
Norveška ureditev koncesij za električno energijo
In Norway, a concession is generally required for the operation of larger hydro power plants.
Na Norveškem je za upravljanje velikih hidroelektrarn ponavadi potrebna koncesija.
The plants holding concessions for waterfall exploitation is obliged to sell a certain volume of their annual production to the municipality within which they are located.
Hidroelektrarne, ki imajo koncesije za izkoriščanje slapov, morajo določeno količino svoje letne proizvodnje obvezno prodati občini, v kateri se nahajajo.
The volume of electricity that the municipality is entitled to purchase is referred to as concession power.
Količina elektrike, do nakupa katere je občina upravičena, se imenuje električna energija po znižani ceni.
This system is laid down in Section 2(12) of the Industrial Licensing Act [10] and Section 12(15) of the Waterfalls Regulation Act [11].
Ta sistem je določen v oddelku 2(12) Zakona o industrijskih licencah [10] in v oddelku 12(15) Zakona o urejanju pravic do uporabe slapov [11].
The legislative rationale is that the municipalities should be ensured a sufficient supply of electricity at a fair price, thus the volume of the concession power is determined on the basis of the general electric power supply needs of each individual municipality [12] and can be up to ten per cent of a plant’s annual production.
Pravna utemeljitev se glasi tako, da mora biti občinam zagotovljena zadostna dobava elektrike po pravični ceni, zato je količina električne energije po znižani ceni določena na podlagi splošnih potreb po električni energiji vsake posamezne občine [12] in lahko dosega deset odstotkov letne proizvodnje elektrarne.
There are, however, no restrictions imposed on the municipalities’ exploitation of concession power.
Vendar pa občine pri načinu, na katerega izkoriščajo električno energijo po znižani ceni, niso omejene.
Thus, the municipalities may use, sell or otherwise deploy it as they see fit.
Zato jo lahko po lastni presoji uporabljajo, prodajajo ali razporedijo kako drugače.
The entitlement does not entail that the municipalities are under an obligation to buy concession power.
Iz te pravice ne sledi, da so občine kakor koli obvezane k nakupu električne energije po znižani ceni.
For concessions pre-dating 1983, the caveat generally applies that once a municipality has decided not to exercise its right to concession power, it loses its right to concession power for the future.
Za koncesije, podeljene pred letom 1983, na splošno velja določilo, da občina izgubi pravico do električne energije po znižani ceni v prihodnosti, če se izkoriščanju pravice do nje enkrat odreče.
The legislation sets out two pricing regimes for concession power;
Zakonodaja določa dva načina oblikovanja cen za električno energijo po znižani ceni:
the first for concessions granted prior to 10 April 1959, the other for concessions granted on 10 April 1959 or later.
prvi je namenjen koncesijam, podeljenim pred 10. aprilom 1959, drugi pa koncesijam, podeljenim 10. aprila 1959 ali pozneje.
For concessions granted before 10 April 1959, the concession power price is calculated as a function of the individual power plant’s cost-price, plus a premium of 20 %.
Za koncesije, podeljene pred 10. aprilom 1959, se znižana cena električne energije izračuna kot funkcija razmerja med stroški in ceno posamezne elektrarne, temu pa se doda premija v višini 20 %.
This model is still applied to concessions granted prior to 10 April 1959, and is in the following referred to as the ‘cost price’ model.
Ta model se še uporablja pri koncesijah, podeljenih pred 10. aprilom 1959 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: model cene glede na stroške).