natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The subsidised network must therefore offer access under fair and non-discriminatory conditions to all operators who request it and will provide them with the possibility of effective and full unbundling [114].
Dejanski grosistični dostop se zagotovi za vsaj sedem let, pravica dostopa do vodov ali drogov pa časovno ne bi smela biti omejena.
Moreover, third party operators must have access to passive and not only active [115] network infrastructure [116].
To ne vpliva na druge podobne regulativne obveznosti, ki jih lahko nacionalni regulativni organi sprejmejo na zadevnem specifičnem trgu, da bi spodbujali učinkovito konkurenco, ali na ukrepe, sprejete med navedenim obdobjem ali po njegovem koncu [118].
Apart from bitstream access and unbundled access to the local loop and sub-loop, the access obligation should therefore also include the right to use ducts and poles, dark fibre or street cabinets [117].
Lahko se zgodi, da na območjih z nizko gostoto prebivalstva, kjer so širokopasovne storitve omejene, ali pri malih lokalnih podjetjih uvedba vseh vrst proizvodov na področju dostopa nesorazmerno poveča investicijske stroške [119] brez znatnih koristi v smislu večje konkurence [120].
Effective wholesale access should be granted for at least seven years and the right of access to ducts or poles should not be limited in time.
V tem primeru se lahko določi, da se proizvodi na področju dostopa, ki zahtevajo obsežno posredovanje države pri subvencionirani infrastrukturi, ki drugače ni predvideno (na primer kolokacija posrednih distribucijskih točk), ponudijo samo v primeru razumnega povpraševanja s strani tretjega operaterja.
This is without prejudice to any similar regulatory obligations that may be imposed by the NRA in the specific market concerned in order to foster effective competition or measures adopted during or after the expiry of that period [118].
Povpraševanje se šteje za razumno, če (i) prosilec za dostop zagotovi usklajen poslovni načrt, ki upravičuje razvoj proizvoda na subvencioniranem omrežju, in (ii) noben drug operater na istem geografskem območju še ne ponuja drugega primerljivega proizvoda na področju dostopa po enakih cenah kot na gosteje poseljenih območjih [121].
It may be the case that in areas with low population density, where there are limited broadband services, or for small local companies, the imposition of all types of access products might disproportionately increase investment costs [119] without delivering significant benefits in terms of increased competition [120].
Vendar pa se na prejšnjo točko ni mogoče sklicevati v gosteje naseljenih območjih, na katerih se lahko pričakuje razvoj konkurence na področju infrastrukture.
In such a situation, one may envisage that access products requiring costly interventions on the subsidised infrastructure not otherwise foreseen (e.g. co-location in intermediary distribution points) be offered only in case of a reasonable demand from a third-party operator.
Zato mora biti na takšnih območjih subvencionirano omrežje prilagojeno za vse vrste proizvodov na področju omrežnega dostopa, ki jih želijo uvesti operaterji [122].(b) Poštena in nediskriminatorna obravnava:
The demand is considered reasonable if (i) the access seeker provides a coherent business plan which justifies the development of the product on the subsidised network and (ii) no comparable access product is already offered in the same geographic area by another operator at equivalent prices to those of more densely populated areas [121].By contrast, the preceding paragraph cannot be invoked in more densely populated areas where one may expect infrastructure competition to develop.
Subvencionirana infrastruktura mora omogočati zagotavljanje konkurenčnih in cenovno dostopnih storitev končnim uporabnikom, ki jih izvajajo konkurenčni operaterji.
Therefore, in such areas, the subsidised network should satisfy all types of network access products that operators may seek [122]. (b) Fair and non-discriminatory treatment:
Kadar je operater omrežja vertikalno integriran, je treba zagotoviti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe, da se preprečijo kakršno koli navzkrižje interesov, neupravičena diskriminacija zoper iskalce dostopa ali ponudnike vsebin ter vse druge skrite posredne prednosti.
The subsidised infrastructure must enable the provision of competitive and affordable services to end-users by competing operators.
V tem smislu bi morala tudi merila za oddajo naročila vsebovati določbo, v kateri je se določi, da dobijo ponudniki izključno grosističnega modela, izključno pasivnega modela ali kombinacije obeh modelov dodatne točke.
Where the network operator is vertically integrated, adequate safeguards must be put in place to prevent any conflict of interest, undue discrimination towards access seekers or content providers and any other hidden indirect advantages.
Zlasti imajo konkurenčni značaj projekti državnih pomoči, ki so namenjeni financiranju zalednih omrežij [123] ali so omejeni na javna dela, pri katerih je dostop odprt za vse operaterje in tehnologije.
In the same vein, the award criteria should contain the provision that bidders proposing a wholesale-only model, a passive-only model or both shall receive additional points.
To se bo upoštevalo pri oceni takih projektov.
State aid projects aiming at the funding of backhaul networks [123] or limited to civil works open for access to all operators and technologies exhibit especially pro-competitive features.
Pomoč za širokopasovna omrežja ultra velikih hitrosti
This feature will be taken into account in the assessment of such projects.
Glede na cilje iz uvoda, zlasti v zvezi z dosego 50-odstotne pokritosti z internetnimi povezavami hitrosti nad 100 Mb/s, in ob upoštevanju, da bodo zlasti končni uporabniki v mestnih območjih verjetno zahtevali večjo zmogljivost omrežja kot so jo pripravljeni zagotoviti komercialni vlagatelji v bližnji prihodnosti, se z odstopanjem od točke 73 javno posredovanje lahko izjemoma dovoli za dostopovna omrežja naslednje generacije, ki lahko zagotovijo ultra velike hitrosti veliko nad 100 Mb/s.
Aid to ultra-fast broadband networks
Na območjih „črnih lis v dostopovnih omrežjih naslednje generacije“ se lahko takšno posredovanje dovoli le, če se na podlagi naslednjih kumulativnih meril dokaže obstoj „velike spremembe“, kakor je zahtevano v točki 47:
In light of the objectives referred to in the Introduction, in particular achieving 50 % penetration to internet connections above 100 Mbps, and taking into account that especially in urban areas there may be higher performance needs compared to what commercial investors are willing to offer in the near future, by way of derogation to paragraph (73), public intervention could exceptionally be allowed for NGA networks able to provide ultra-fast speeds well above 100 Mbps.
obstoječa ali načrtovana [124] dostopovna omrežja naslednje generacije ne dosežejo prostorov končnih uporabnikov z optičnimi omrežji [125];
In ‘black NGA’ areas, such intervention could only be allowed if the ‘step change’ required by paragraph (47) is proved on the basis of the following cumulative criteria:
stanje na trgu se ne razvija v smeri doseganja konkurenčnega zagotavljanja ultra hitrih storitev [126] s povezavami s hitrostjo nad 100 Mb/s v bližnji prihodnosti na podlagi naložbenih načrtov komercialnih operaterjev v skladu s točkami 59 do 61;
the existing or planned [124] NGA networks do not reach the end user premises with fibre networks [125];
pričakuje se povpraševanje po takih izboljšavah kakovosti [127].
the market situation is not evolving towards the achievement of a competitive provision of ultra-fast services [126] above 100 Mbps in the near future by the investment plans of commercial operators in accordance with (59) to (61);
Če so razmere takšne, kot so opisane v prejšnji točki, mora vsako novo subvencionirano omrežje spoštovati pogoje združljivosti točk 74 in 76.
there is expected demand for such qualitative improvements [127].
Poleg tega mora organ, ki dodeljuje pomoč, dokazati tudi, da:
In the situation described in the previous paragraph, any new subsidised network must respect the compatibility conditions of paragraphs (74) and (76).
pomoč ne bo povzročila pretiranega izkrivljanja konkurence z drugimi tehnologijami dostopovnih omrežij naslednje generacije, za katere so komercialni vlagatelji nedavno v istih ciljnih območjih izvedli precejšnje nove infrastrukturne naložbe [129].
and
Te smernice se bodo uporabljale od prvega dne po sprejetju.
the aid does not lead to an excessive distortion of competition with other NGA technologies that have recently been the subject of significant new infrastructure investments by market operators in the same target areas [129].
Nadzorni organ jih bo uporabljal v zvezi z vsemi priglašenimi ukrepi pomoči, glede katerih mora odločati po njihovem sprejetju, čeprav so bili projekti priglašeni pred objavo.
Only if these additional conditions are fulfilled, public funding of such networks might be considered compatible under the balancing test.
V skladu s pravili Nadzornega organa, ki uporabljajo pri ocenjevanju nezakonitih državnih pomoči [130], bo Nadzorni organ za nezakonito pomoč uporabil pravila, ki so veljala v času odobritve pomoči.
In other words, such funding would have to lead to a significant, sustainable, pro-competitive and non-temporary technological advancement without creating disproportionate disincentives to private investments.
Zato bo te smernice uporabil v primeru nezakonite pomoči, ki je bila dodeljena po njihovi objavi.
Final Provisions
Nadzorni organ državam Efte na podlagi člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP predlaga, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe in po potrebi spremenijo svoje veljavne sheme pomoči, da se uskladijo z določbami iz teh smernic v dvanajstih mesecih po sprejetju.
These Guidelines will be applied from the first day following their adoption.
Države Efte so vabljene, da izrecno brezpogojno soglašajo s temi predlaganimi primernimi ukrepi v dveh mesecih od datuma prejetja teh ukrepov.
The Authority will apply these Guidelines to all notified aid measures in respect of which it is called upon to take a decision after the adoption of the Guidelines, even where the projects were notified prior to that date.
Če Nadzorni organ ne bo prejel nobenega odgovora, bo domneval, da se zadevna država Efte ne strinja s predlaganimi ukrepi.
In accordance with the Authority's Applicable Rules For The Assessment Of Unlawful state Aid [130], the Authority will apply to unlawful aid the rules in force at the time when the aid was granted.
Nadzorni organ bo te smernice pregledal v skladu s prihodnjimi revizijami ustreznega Sporočila Komisije – Smernice Skupnosti o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči v zvezi s hitro postavitvijo širokopasovnih omrežij.
Accordingly, it will apply these Guidelines in the case of unlawful aid granted after its publication.
To poglavje ustreza Sporočilu Komisije – Smernice EU o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči v zvezi s hitro postavitvijo širokopasovnih omrežij (UL C 25, 26.1.2013, str. 1).
The Authority herewith proposes to EFTA States, on the basis of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement, to take appropriate measures and amend, where necessary, their existing aid schemes in order to bring them into line with the provisions of these Guidelines within 12 months after their adoption.
Sporočilo Evropske komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij, COM(2010) 245 final, Evropska digitalna agenda, kakor je priznana v resoluciji s 37. seje skupnega parlamentarnega odbora EGP z dne 26. oktobra 2011.
The EFTA States are invited to give their explicit unconditional agreement to these proposed appropriate measures within two months from the date of receipt of the measures.
Glej člen 12(4) akta iz točke 5cl Priloge XI k Sporazumu EGP (Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in sveta 2002/21/ES z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (okvirna direktiva) (UL L 108, 24.4.2002, str. 33)) (UL L 116, 22.4.2004, str. 60, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 20, 22.4.2004, str. 14), kakor je bil spremenjen z Direktivo 2009/140/ES (direktiva o boljši zakonodaji) (UL L 337, 18.12.2009, str. 37) (še ni vključena v Sporazum EGP) in z aktom iz točke 5cl Priloge XI k Sporazumu EGP (Uredba (ES) št. 544/2009, (UL L 167, 29.6.2009, str. 12);UL L 334, 17.12.2009, str. 4, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 68, 17.12.2009, str. 4).
In the absence of any reply, the Authority will assume that the EFTA State in question does not agree with the proposed measures.
Glej akt iz točke 26l Priloge XI k Sporazumu EGP (Priporočilo Komisije z dne 20.9.2010 o reguliranem dostopu do dostopovnih omrežij naslednje generacije (NGA) (UL L 251, 25.9.2010, str. 35)) UL L 341, 13.12.2012, str. 28, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 70, 13.12.2012, str. 32.
The Authority will review the present Guidelines in line with future revisions of the corresponding Communication from the Commission — Community Guidelines for the application of state aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks by the Commission.
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije N 398/05 – Madžarska, Razvojna davčna ugodnost za širokopasovne storitve.
This Chapter corresponds to the Communication from the European Commission — EU Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks (OJ C 25, 26.1.2013, p. 1).
Sredstva javnega podjetja pomenijo državna sredstva v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP, ker javni organi ta sredstva nadzirajo.
Communication from the European Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2010) 245 final, A Digital Agenda for Europe, as recognised in the resolution from the 37th Meeting of the EEA Joint Parliamentary Committee on 26 October 2011.
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji (C-482/99, Recueil [2002], str.
See Article 12(4) of Act referred to at point 5cl of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 33) (OJ L 116, 22.4.2004, p. 60 and EEA Supplement No 20, 22.4.2004, p. 14), as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC (Better Regulations Directive) (OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p. 37) (not yet incorporated into the EEA Agreement) and by Act referred to at point 5cl of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement (Regulation (EC) No 544/2009, (OJ L 167, 29.6.2009, p. 12);OJ L 334, 17.12.2009, p. 4 and EEA Supplement No 68, 17.12.2009, p. 4).
I-4397).
See Act referred to at point 26l of Annex XI of the EEA Agreement (Commission Recommendation of 20.9.2010 on regulated access to Next Generation Access Networks (NGA) (OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 35)OJ L 341, 13.12.2012, p. 28 and EEA Supplement No 70, 13.12.2012, p. 32.
V skladu s to sodbo bo treba nadalje oceniti, ali se financiranje prek javnega podjetja lahko pripiše državi.
See for instance, Commission Decision No 398/05 — Hungary, Development Tax Benefit for Broadband.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 24. marca 2011 v zadevah Freistaat Sachsen in drugi proti Komisiji, (T-443/08 in T-455/08, Recueil [2011], str.
Resources of a public undertaking constitute State resources within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement because the public authorities control these resources.
II-1311), točke 93 do 95).
Case C-482/99 France v Commission, [2002] ECR I-4397.
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije v zadevi NN 24/07 – Češka, Mestno brezžično omrežje v Pragi.
In line with this judgment, it will further have to be assessed whether financing via a public undertaking is imputable to the State.
Podobno v primeru, da je omrežje zgrajeno ali da so širokopasovne storitve naročene za zadovoljitev lastnih potreb javne uprave, tak ukrep v nekaterih okoliščinah morda ne daje prednosti gospodarskim podjetjem.
Case T-443/08 and T-455/08 Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission [2011] ECR II-1311, paragraphs (93) to (95).
Glej Odločbo Komisije v zadevi N 46/07 – Združeno kraljestvo, Shema za omrežje javnega sektorja v Walesu.
See, for instance, Commission Decision in Case NN 24/07 — Czech Republic, Prague Municipal Wireless Network.
Odločba Komisije v zadevi SA.31687 (N 436/10) – Italija, Širokopasovna omrežja v Furlaniji–Julijski krajini (Projekt Ermes), in zadevi N 407/09 – Španija, Xaraxa Oberta.
Similarly, if a network is constructed or broadband services are procured to satisfy the own needs of the public administration, under certain circumstances, such intervention might not confer advantage to economic undertakings.
Koristi subvencije se verjetno vsaj delno prenesejo na tretje operaterje, tudi če plačajo nadomestilo za grosistični dostop.
See Commission Decision in Case N 46/07– United Kingdom, Welsh Public Sector Network Scheme.
Grosistične cene so dejansko pogosto regulirane.
Commission Decision in Case SA.31687(N 436/10) — Italy, Broadband in Friuli Venezia Giulia (Project Ermes) and in Case N 407/09 — Spain, Xarxa Oberta.
Regulacija cen pa pomeni nižje cene, kot bi jih grosistični ponudnik sicer lahko dosegel na trgu (in bi lahko bile monopolne, če ne bi bilo konkurence z drugimi omrežji).
It is likely that the benefit of the subsidy is at least partially passed on to third party operators even if they pay a remuneration for the wholesale access.
Kadar cene niso regulirane, mora grosistični ponudnik v vsakem primeru zagotoviti cene, primerljive s tistimi, ki se uporabljajo na drugih, konkurenčnejših območjih (glej točko 74(h) spodaj), kar bo verjetno prav tako povzročilo nižje cene, kot bi jih sicer dosegel na trgu.
Indeed wholesale prices are often regulated.
Subvencije za rezidenčne uporabnike ne spadajo v področje uporabe člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP.
Price regulation leads to a lower price than the one which the wholesaler could otherwise achieve on the market (which could be a monopoly price if there is no competition with other networks).
Primer za to bi bila pomoč za poslovna okrožja; glej na primer Odločbo Komisije v zadevi N 626/09 – Italija, Dostopovna omrežja naslednje generacije za industrijska okrožja v provinci Lucca.
Where prices are not regulated, the wholesaler will in any case be required to benchmark his prices on the average prices applied in other, more competitive areas (see paragraph (74) h) below) which is also likely to lead to a price lower than the one which the wholesaler could otherwise have achieved on the market.
Zadeva C-310/99, Republika Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil [2002], str.
Subsidies to residential users fall outside the scope of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.
I-02289, točka 65.
An example would be aid to a business districts, see for instance, Commission Decision in Case N 626/09 — Italy, NGA for industrial districts of Lucca.
Glej Odločbo Komisije v zadevi N 237/08 – Nemčija, Podpora za širokopasovno omrežje v Spodnji Saški.
Case C-310/99 Italian Republic v Commission [2002] ECR I-02289, paragraph 65.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji (C-303/88, Recueil 1991, str.
See Commission Decision in Case N 237/08 — Germany, Broadband support in Niedersachsen.
I-1433, točke 20–22).
Case C-303/88, Italian Republic v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433, at paragraphs 20-22.
Odločba Komisije z dne 11. decembra 2007 v zadevi C 53/06 – Nizozemska, Citynet Amsterdam – državna pomoč mestne občine Amsterdam za amsterdamsko omrežje steklenih vlaken zaradi naložbe v omrežje FTTH (omrežje kablov iz steklenih vlaken do doma) (UL L 247, 16.9.2008, str. 27).
Commission Decision of 11 December 2007 in Case C 53/06 — The Netherlands, Citynet Amsterdam — Investment by the city of Amsterdam in a fibre-to-the home (FttH) network (OJ L 247, 16.9.2008, p. 27).
Smernice Nadzornega organa o državnih jamstvih (UL L 274, 26.10.2000, Dopolnilo EGP št. 48, 26.10.2000, str. 45), kakor je bila spremenjena z UL L 105, 21.4.2011, str. 32, Dopolnilo EGP št. 23, 21.4.2011, str. 1.
According to the case-law, undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest must have been assigned that task by an act of a public authority.
II-2267, točka 126) in sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 15. junija 2005 v zadevi Fred Olsen, SA proti Komisiji (T-17/02, ZOdl.
see Joined Cases T-204/97 and T-270/97 EPAC — Empresa para a Agroalimentação e Cereais, SA v Commission [2000] ECR II-2267, paragraph 126 and Case T-17/02 Fred Olsen, SA v Commission [2005] ECR II-2031, paragraphs 186, 188-189.
II-2031, točke 186, 188 in 189).
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747.
Glej: http://www.eftasurv.int/media/state-aid-guidelines/Part-VI---Compensation-granted-for-the-provision-of-services-of-general-economic-interest.pdf (še neobjavljeno).
Hereinafter referred to as ‘the Altmark Judgment’.
Glej http://www.eftasurv.int/media/state-aid-guidelines/Part-VI---Framework-for-state-aid-in-the-form-of-public-service-compensation.pdf (še neobjavljeno).
See http://www.eftasurv.int/media/state-aid-guidelines/Part-VI---Compensation-granted-for-the-provision-of-services-of-general-economic-interest.pdf (not yet published).
Akt iz točke 1h Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP, Sklep št. 66/2012 (UL L 207, 2.8.2012, str. 46, in Dopolnilo EGP št. 43, 2.8.2012, str. 56), (UL L 7, 11.1.2012, str. 3).
See http://www.eftasurv.int/media/state-aid-guidelines/Part-VI---Framework-for-state-aid-in-the-form-of-public-service-compensation.pdf (not yet published).
Akt iz točke 1ha Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP, glej Sklep Skupnega odbora št. 225/2012 z dne 7. decembra 2012, še neobjavljeno.
Act referred to at point 1h of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, Decision No 66/2012 (OJ L 207, 2.8.2012, p. 46 and EEA Supplement No 43, 2.8.2012, p. 56), (OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3-10).
Glej točko 48 smernic Nadzornega organa o državni pomoči za nadomestilo, dodeljeno za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, in točko 13 Okvira za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve).
Act referred to at point 1ha of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, see Joint Committee Decision No 225/2012 of 7 December 2012, not yet published.
Glej točko 49 smernic Nadzornega organa o državni pomoči za nadomestilo, dodeljeno za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
See point 48 of the Authority's Guidelines on compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest, and point 13 of the Framework for state aid in the form of public service compensation).
Pojem „bližnja prihodnost“ je treba skladno s točko 59 teh smernic razumeti kot triletno obdobje.
The term in the ‘near future’ should be understood as referring to a period of three years in line with paragraph (59) of these Guidelines.
Pasivna omrežna infrastruktura je v osnovi fizična infrastruktura omrežij.
In line with the principle expressed in point 50 of the Authority's Guidelines on compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest.
Za opredelitev glej glosar.
See also Commission Decision N 284/05 — Ireland, Regional broadband Programme: Metropolitan Area Networks (‘MANs’), phases II and III and N 890/06 — France, Aide du Sicoval pour un réseau de très haut débit.
Omrežje mora biti tehnološko nevtralno, da prosilcem za dostop omogoča uporabo vseh razpoložljivih tehnologij za zagotavljanje storitev končnim uporabnikom.
The passive network infrastructure is basically the physical infrastructure of the networks.
Skladno s točko 74(g) teh smernic.
For a definition, see the glossary.
Utemeljitev te omejitve sledi iz dejstva, da so tržne sile po končani postavitvi širokopasovnega omrežja z univerzalnim dostopom navadno dovolj močne, da se zagotovijo komunikacijske storitve po konkurenčnih cenah za vse uporabnike.
A network should be technologically neutral and thus enable access seekers to use any of the available technologies to provide services to end-users.
Taki zaščitni ukrepi bi morali vključevati zlasti obveznost ločenega računovodstva, lahko pa tudi vzpostavitev subjekta, ki je strukturno in pravno ločen od vertikalno integriranega operaterja.