natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes that the Joint Undertaking developed a new methodology for residual error rate estimation, similar to the one used by the Commission services in charge of co-managed funding; acknowledges that the first evaluation of the residual error rate based on the 157 audited transactions was 0,73 %, while a recent update based on 331 transactions resulted in an error rate of 0,66 %, below the materiality threshold of 2 %;
ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje razvilo novo metodologijo za ocenjevanje stopnje preostale napake, ki je podobna tisti, ki jo uporabljajo službe Komisije, pristojne za skupno upravljanje financiranja; ugotavlja, da je prva ocena stopnje preostale napake, ki je temeljila na 157 revidiranih transakcijah, znašala 0,73 %, nedavno posodobljena ocena, ki je temeljila na 331 transakcijah, pa je pokazala 0,66-odstotno stopnjo napake, ki je bila pod 2-odstotnim pragom pomembnosti;
Ascertains from the Joint Undertaking that the Member States' contributions were under the level of 1,8 times the Union contribution as requested by the Joint Undertaking's statute in order to comply with the limitations imposed by the State aid rules; notes in particular that for the industrial participants in large pilot line projects the total public funding cannot exceed 25 % while the Joint Undertaking's statute requires allocating the same reimbursement rate to each participant;
na podlagi informacij skupnega podjetja ugotavlja, da so bili prispevki držav članic pod stopnjo 1,8-kratnika finančnega prispevka Unije, kot je določeno v statutu skupnega podjetja, da se spoštujejo omejitve, ki jih nalagajo pravila za državno pomoč; zlasti ugotavlja, da za industrijske udeležence pri velikih pilotnih projektih vsa javna sredstva ne smejo preseči 25 %, pri čemer statut skupnega podjetja zahteva dodelitev enake stopnje povračila za vsakega udeleženca;
Acknowledges that the lower contributions from the Members States were more than compensated by increased private sector contributions, carrying 65 % of the total costs and thus reaching a very high leverage of the Union funding;
je seznanjen, da so bili nižji prispevki iz držav članic več kot izravnani s povečanimi prispevki iz zasebnega sektorja, ki je nosil 65 % vseh stroškov, in je bil tako dosežen zelo velik učinek vzvoda sredstev Unije;
Takes note that the Commission will carry out an evaluation to assess the ENIAC activity up to the date of the ECSEL JTI creation, as provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 72/2008 setting up the ENIAC Joint Undertaking, to be considered for the discharge for the financial year 2014;
ugotavlja, da bo Komisija izvedla vrednotenje dejavnosti skupnega podjetja ENIAC vse do datuma ustanovitve skupne tehnološke pobude za elektronske komponente in sisteme za evropski vodilni položaj (ECSEL), kot določa Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 72/2008 o ustanovitvi Skupnega podjetja ENIAC, ki ga bo upoštevala v okviru razrešnice za proračunsko leto 2014;
Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the CVs and the declarations of interests of its Executive Director and managers as required by the Staff Regulations and the implementing rules were collected and posted on the Joint Undertaking's web site; notes that a comprehensive database including all identified information related to conflicts of interests as well as the measures taken has been established and is regularly maintained;
na podlagi informacij skupnega podjetja ugotavlja, da so bili življenjepisi in izjave o interesih izvršnega direktorja in upravljavcev v skladu z zahtevami iz kadrovskih predpisov in izvedbenimi pravili zbrani in objavljeni na spletišču skupnega podjetja; ugotavlja, da je bila vzpostavljena celovita baza podatkov, ki vsebuje vse identificirane informacije glede nasprotij interesov in sprejetih ukrepov ter ki se redno posodablja;
Recalls that the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) Decision [1] establishes a monitoring and reporting system related to the protection, dissemination and transfer of research results; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that 211,5 publications and 16,6 patents per EUR 10000000 of Union grants shows a high productivity of its research results and that it is compliant with all requests expressed so far by the FP7 coordinators.
opozarja, da sklep o sedmem okvirnem programu [1] vzpostavlja sistem spremljanja in poročanja, ki zajema varstvo, razširjanje in prenos rezultatov raziskav; na podlagi informacij skupnega podjetja ugotavlja, da 211,5 publikacij in 16,6 patentov za vsakih 10000000 EUR subvencij Unije kaže na veliko produktivnost raziskovalnih rezultatov podjetja ter da je slednje v skladu z vsemi zahtevami, ki so jih do sedaj izrazili koordinatorji sedmega okvirnega programa.
Article 7 of Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) (OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Člen 7 Sklepa št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o Sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str. 1).
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section II — European Council and Council
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2013, oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section II — European Council and Council,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2013, oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet,
A. whereas all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions;
A. ker bi morale vse institucije Unije poslovati pregledno in biti v celoti odgovorne državljanom Unije za porabo sredstev, ki so jim bila zaupana kot institucijam Unije;
B. whereas the European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be subject to democratic accountability towards the citizens of the Union as far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union;
B. ker bi morala biti Evropski svet in Svet kot instituciji Unije demokratično odgovorna državljanom Unije, saj prejemata sredstva iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije;
C. whereas Parliament is the sole directly elected body among the Union institutions and has responsibility to grant discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union;
C. ker je Parlament edini neposredno izvoljeni organ med institucijami Unije in je odgovoren za podelitev razrešnice za izvrševanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije;
Emphasises Parliament's role specified in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in respect of the budget discharge;
poudarja vlogo, ki jo Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) podeljuje Parlamentu glede podelitve razrešnice za izvrševanje proračuna;
Points out that under Article 335 TFEU, ‘[…] the Union shall be represented by each of the institutions, by virtue of their administrative autonomy, in matters relating to their respective operation’ and that, accordingly, taking into account Article 55 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (the Financial Regulation), the institutions are individually responsible for the implementation of their budgets;
poudarja, da v skladu s členom 335 PDEU „[…] v zadevah, povezanih z delovanjem posameznih institucij, Unijo zastopa vsaka institucija na podlagi svoje upravne avtonomije“, kar pomeni, da so ob upoštevanju člena 55 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 (finančna uredba) institucije vsaka posebej odgovorne za izvrševanje svojega proračuna;
Emphasises the role of Parliament and of other institutions within the discharge procedure as governed by the provisions of the Financial Regulation, in particular Articles 164, 165 and 166 thereof;
poudarja vlogo Parlamenta in drugih institucij v postopku razrešnice v skladu z določbami finančne uredbe, zlasti členov 164, 165 in 166;
Notes that under Rule 94 of its Rules of Procedure, ‘the provisions governing the procedure for granting discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget shall likewise apply to the procedure for granting discharge to […] the persons responsible for the implementation of the budgets of other institutions and bodies of the European Union such as the Council (as regards its activity as executive) […]’;
ugotavlja, da se v skladu s členom 94 Poslovnika „[d]oločbe, ki urejajo postopek podelitve razrešnice Komisiji glede izvrševanja proračuna, […] smiselno uporabljajo tudi za […] postopek podelitve razrešnice osebam, odgovornim za izvrševanje proračunov drugih institucij in organov Evropske unije, kot so Svet (glede njegovega delovanja kot izvršilnega organa) […]“;
Regrets that the Council did not provide any explanation on the increasing underspending and carry-overs of commitments in their 2013 budget;
obžaluje, da Svet ni ponudil obrazložitve za čedalje večjo nezadostno porabo in prenos sredstev v svojem proračunu za leto 2013;
Reminds the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date;
opozarja Svet na zahtevo Parlamenta glede poročil o napredku nepremičninskih projektov in podrobne razčlenitve doslej nastalih stroškov;
Urges the Council to provide a thorough written explanation detailing the total amount of appropriations used in the purchase of the ‘Residence Palace’ building, the budget items from which those appropriations were drawn, the instalments that have been paid thus far and the instalments that remain to be paid;
poziva Svet, naj pripravi izčrpno pisno pojasnilo in v njem navede celotni znesek proračunskih sredstev, porabljenih za nakup stavbe Residence Palace, proračunske postavke, iz katerih se je ta denar črpal, obroke, ki so bili že plačani, in obroke, ki jih bo treba še poravnati;
Reiterates its call on the Council to provide information on its process of administrative modernisation, in particular on the concrete implementing measures of that process and on the anticipated impact on the Council's budget;
ponovno poziva Svet, naj posreduje informacije o svojem procesu upravne posodobitve, zlasti o konkretnih izvedbenih ukrepih tega procesa in o predvidenih posledicah za proračun Sveta;
Regrets the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Council; points out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for the reasons set out in its resolutions of 10 May 2011 [1], 25 October 2011 [2], 10 May 2012 [3], 23 October 2012 [4], 17 April 2013 [5], 9 October 2013 [6], 3 April 2014 [7] and 23 October 2014 [8] and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2013 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 29 April 2015 [9];
obžaluje, da so se v dosedanjih postopkih podelitve razrešnice vedno znova pojavljale težave, ker Svet ni bil pripravljen sodelovati; poudarja, da je Parlament zavrnil podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunska leta 2009, 2010, 2011 in 2012 in razloge za to navedel v resolucijah z dne 10. maja 2011 [1], 25. oktobra 2011 [2], 10. maja 2012 [3], 23. oktobra 2012 [4], 17. aprila 2013 [5], 9. oktobra 2013 [6], 3. aprila 2014 [7] in 23. oktobra 2014 [8], podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta za proračunsko leto 2013 pa je odložil zaradi razlogov, ki jih je navedel v resoluciji z dne 29. aprila 2015 [9];
Insists that an effective budgetary control exercise requires cooperation between Parliament and the Council as set out in its resolution of 29 April 2015; confirms that Parliament is unable to make an informed decision on granting discharge;
vztraja, da je za izvajanje učinkovitega proračunskega nadzora potrebno sodelovanje med Parlamentom in Svetom, kot je navedel v resoluciji z dne 29. aprila 2015; potrjuje, da Parlament ne more sprejeti informirane odločitve o podelitvi razrešnice;
Reminds the Council of the Commission's view, expressed in its letter of 23 January 2014, that all institutions are fully part of the follow-up process after the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure;
opozarja Svet na stališče Komisije iz pisma z dne 23. januarja 2014, da so vse institucije v celoti del procesa nadaljnjih ukrepov, ki sledijo ugotovitvam Parlamenta v postopku podelitve razrešnice, in da bi morale vse institucije v medsebojnem sodelovanju zagotoviti nemoten potek postopka razrešnice;
Regrets that the Council continues to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions; recalls the conclusions of the Parliament workshop on Parliament's right to grant discharge to the Council held on 27 September 2012, at which the legal and academic experts largely agreed on the Parliament's right to information; in this respect refers to the third subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU which stipulates that each institution, body, office or agency shall ensure that its proceedings are transparent;
obžaluje, da Svet še vedno ni odgovoril na vprašanja Parlamenta; opozarja na ugotovitve z delavnice Parlamenta o pravici Parlamenta do podelitve razrešnice Svetu, ki je potekala 27. septembra 2012, na kateri so se pravni in akademski strokovnjaki večinoma strinjali s pravico Parlamenta do obveščenosti; s tem v zvezi se sklicuje na tretji pododstavek člena 15(3) PDEU, ki določa, da vsaka institucija, organ, urad ali agencija zagotovi preglednost svojih postopkov;
Insists that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and that the fundamental elements of such scrutiny have been laid down in its discharge resolutions of the past years;
vztraja, da je treba odhodke Sveta pregledovati na enak način kot odhodke drugih institucij in da so bili temeljni elementi takšnega pregledovanja določeni v resolucijah o podelitvi razrešnice iz preteklih let;
Emphasises Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge pursuant to Articles 316, 317 and 319 TFEU, in line with current interpretation and practice, namely to grant discharge to each heading of the budget individually in order to maintain transparency and democratic accountability towards Union taxpayers;
opozarja na pristojnost Parlamenta za podelitev razrešnice na podlagi členov 316, 317 in 319 PDEU, ki je v skladu s sedanjo razlago in prakso, in sicer da razrešnico podeli za vsak proračunski naslov posebej, da se ohranita preglednost in demokratična odgovornost davkoplačevalcem Unije;
Takes the view that Council's failure to submit the requested documents to Parliament above all undermines the right of citizens of the Union to information and transparency and is becoming a cause for concern, reflecting as it does a certain democratic deficit within the Union institutions;
meni, da dejstvo, da Svet zahtevanih dokumentov ni posredoval Parlamentu, spodkopava zlasti pravico državljanov Unije do obveščenosti in preglednosti ter postaja razlog za skrb, saj priča o določenem demokratičnem primanjkljaju v institucijah Unije;
Considers that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure can be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.
meni, da bi bilo zadovoljivo sodelovanje med Parlamentom, Evropskim svetom in Svetom, ki bo rezultat odprtega in formalnega dialoga, pozitivno znamenje za državljane Unije.
OJ L 266, 5.9.2014, p. 26.
UL L 266, 5.9.2014, str. 26.
OJ L 334, 21.11.2014, p. 95.
UL L 334, 21.11.2014, str. 95.
OJ L 255, 30.9.2015, p. 22.
UL L 255, 30.9.2015, str. 22.
Resolution (EU) 2016/1505 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU) 2016/1505
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2014
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada za proračunsko leto 2014
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2014,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada za proračunsko leto 2014,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0133/2016),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve (A8-0133/2016),
A. whereas, according to its financial statements, the final budget of the European Asylum Support Office (‘the Office’) for the financial year 2014 was EUR 15663975; whereas 94 % of the budget of the Office derives from the Union budget;
A. ker računovodski izkazi Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada (v nadaljnjem besedilu: urad) kažejo, da je njegov končni proračun v proračunskem letu 2014 znašal 15663975 EUR; ker 94 % proračuna urada izvira iz proračuna Unije;
B. whereas the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’), in its report on the annual accounts of the Office for the financial year 2014 (‘the Court's report’), states that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Office’s annual accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular;
B. ker Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu o zaključnem računu urada za proračunsko leto 2014 (v nadaljevanju: poročilo Računskega sodišča) navaja, da je prejelo razumno zagotovilo o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov urada ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij;
Follow-up of 2013 discharge
Nadaljnji ukrepi v zvezi z razrešnico za leto 2013
Notes from the Court’s report that two comments made in the Court's 2012 and 2013 reports respectively are marked as ‘Outstanding’; notes furthermore that three comments made in the Court’s 2012 and 2013 reports are marked as ‘Ongoing’, while three comments made in the Court’s 2013 report are marked as ‘Not Applicable’;
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da sta dve pripombi iz poročil Računskega sodišča iz leta 2012 in 2013 označeni kot „neizvedeni“; ugotavlja tudi, da so tri pripombe iz poročil Računskega sodišča iz leta 2012 in 2013 označene kot „se izvajajo“, tri pripombe iz poročila iz leta 2013 pa kot „ni relevantno“;
it has included the information on accruals for staff expenses in the appropriate forms together with the necessary justifications for the financial year 2014,
je vključil informacije o aktivnih časovnih razmejitvah za stroške zaposlenih v ustrezni obliki skupaj s potrebnimi obrazložitvami za proračunsko leto 2014,
measures have been put in place to tackle the recurrent issues of misestimating budgetary needs and late payments as well as the matters of transparency and conflicts of interest,
je sprejel ukrepe za odpravo ponavljajočih se težav slabe ocene proračunskih potreb in zamud pri plačilih, pa tudi na področju preglednosti in nasprotja interesov,
a conflict of interest policy was endorsed by the Management Board by the end of 2013 and all members of the Management Board as well as the Executive Director have signed the Office's conflict of interest form and confirmed the absence of conflicts of interest;
je upravni odbor ob koncu leta 2013 sprejel politiko glede nasprotja interesov, vsi člani tega odbora ter izvršni direktor pa so podpisali obrazec urada o nasprotju interesov in potrdili, da nasprotja ni;
Notes with concern that the Office carried over budget commitments of EUR 1300000 which were not covered by legal commitments; reminds the Office that this is in contradiction with the Financial Regulation; acknowledges the decision of the Office to correct these irregular carry-overs in the budget management system in 2015, due to the financial period having already been closed for the financial year of 2014;
je zaskrbljen, ker je urad prenesel 1300000 EUR proračunskih obveznosti, ki niso bile zajete v pravnih obveznostih; spominja urad, da je to v nasprotju s finančno uredbo; je seznanjen z odločitvijo urada, da se nepravilno prenesena sredstva popravijo v sistemu upravljanja proračuna v letu 2015, saj je bilo proračunsko obdobje za proračunsko leto 2014 že zaključeno;
Notes that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2014 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 84,69 %, representing a decrease of 2,65 % compared to 2013; notes furthermore that the payment appropriations execution rate was 71,33 %, representing a decrease of 15,85 % compared to 2013;
ugotavlja, da je stopnja izvrševanja proračuna zaradi proračunskega spremljanja v proračunskem letu 2014 znašala 84,69 %, kar je 2,65 % manj kot leta 2013; ugotavlja tudi, da je stopnja izvrševanja plačil znašala 71,33 %, kar je 15,85 % manj kot leta 2013;
Draws attention to the fact that 1062 payments, representing 28,6 %, were made after the time limit set in the Financial Regulation, representing an increase of 10,6 % compared to 2013; notes with concern that the average delay for late payments increased by three days to 24 days from 2013 to 2014; notes from the Office that a series of measures were introduced to reduce late payments as well as that the rate of late payments in 2015 was reduced in 2015; requests the Office to report to the discharge authority on measures taken in order to tackle this issue;
opozarja, da je bilo 1062 plačil, kar je 28,6 %, izvršenih po roku, določenem v finančni uredbi, kar je 10,6 % več kot leta 2013; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da se je povprečna zamuda pri plačilih v letu 2014 povečala na 24 dni, kar je tri dni več kot leta 2013; je seznanjen s trditvami urada, da je uvedel vrsto ukrepov za zmanjšanje zamud pri plačilih ter da je v letu 2015 znižal pogostost teh zamud; poziva urad, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o sprejetih ukrepih za odpravo teh težav;
Notes from the Office that it will review its annual budget at least twice a year starting in the second quarter of 2015 with the aim of improving budget planning and the implementation process, as well as reducing the disproportionate amount of carry-overs; notes furthermore that the Office introduced a new format for monthly budget status reports as well as internal workshops on budget implementation and financial management; calls on the Office to report to the discharge authority on the effectiveness of the measures taken;
je seznanjen s trditvami urada, da bo vsaj dvakrat na leto pregledal svoj letni proračun, in sicer prvič v drugem četrtletju leta 2015, da bi tako izboljšal proračunsko načrtovanje in izvrševanje ter zmanjšal nesorazmerne prenose sredstev; poleg tega ugotavlja, da je urad uvedel novo obliko mesečnih poročil o stanju proračuna, pa tudi interne delavnice o izvrševanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju; poziva urad, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o učinkovitosti sprejetih ukrepov;