natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OJ L 314, 1.12.2015, p. 49.
UL L 314, 1.12.2015, str. 49.
OJ L 333, 8.12.2016, p. 50.
UL L 333, 8.12.2016, str. 50.
OJ L 318, 2.12.2017, p. 25.
UL L 318, 2.12.2017, str. 25.
Resolution (EU) 2018/2074 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU) 2018/2074
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2016
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada za proračunsko leto 2016
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2016,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada za proračunsko leto 2016,
A. whereas all Union decentralised agencies ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union bodies;
A. ker bi morale vse decentralizirane agencije Unije poslovati pregledno in biti v celoti odgovorne državljanom Unije za porabo sredstev, ki so jim bila zaupana kot organom Unije;
B. whereas Parliament's role in respect of the discharge is specified in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in the Financial Regulation and in the Framework Financial Regulation;
B. ker je vloga Parlamenta v postopku razrešnice opredeljena v Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), finančni uredbi in okvirni finančni uredbi;
Underlines the importance of acting responsibly, in an accountable and transparent manner, and in accordance with all relevant rules and regulations, in the implementation of the Union budget;
poudarja pomen odgovornega ravnanja pri izvrševanju proračuna Unije na odgovoren in pregleden način ter v skladu z vsemi ustreznimi pravili in predpisi;
Recalls the role of Parliament within the discharge procedure, as governed by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Financial Regulation and its rules of procedure;
opozarja na vlogo Parlamenta v postopku razrešnice, kot jo določajo PDEU, finančna uredba in poslovnik Parlamenta;
Welcomes the fact that the initial decision of 18 April 2018 postponing the discharge decision for the financial year 2016 led to the strong corrective measures taken by the Commission's Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs, the management board of the European Asylum Support Office (the ‘Office’) and the Office's new ad interim executive director;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je prvotna odločitev z dne 18. aprila 2018, v kateri je bil sklep o podelitvi razrešnice za proračunsko leto 2016 odložen, privedla do strogih korektivnih ukrepov, ki so jih sprejeli Generalni direktorat Komisije za migracije in notranje zadeve, upravni odbor Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada (v nadaljnjem besedilu: urad) in novi začasni izvršni direktor urada;
Recognises that, apart from the completion of the European Anti-Fraud Office's (OLAF) investigation against the previous leadership of the Office, the corrective measures taken to date have partially responded to the reservations presented by Parliament in its decision of 18 April 2018 postponing the discharge;
priznava, da so se, razen zaključka preiskave Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) proti prejšnjemu vodstvu urada, korektivni ukrepi, ki so bili do zdaj sprejeti, delno odzvali na pridržke, ki jih je Parlament izrazil v svojem sklepu z dne 18. aprila 2018 o odložitvi razrešnice;
The ongoing investigation of OLAF
Potekajoča preiskava OLAF
Recalls the fact that an OLAF investigation is currently ongoing concerning several former and current members of the Office occupying middle or senior management positions;
opozarja, da trenutno poteka preiskava OLAF v zvezi z več nekdanjimi in sedanjimi člani urada na srednjih ali višjih vodstvenih položajih;
Notes with appreciation the decision of the management board on 6 June 2018 to release the executive director from his duties with immediate effect; welcomes the designation of an ad interim executive director, not subject to the OLAF investigation; regrets, however, that the management board did not take this action on its own initiative much earlier in the process which would have avoided the delay in the discharge procedure;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je upravni odbor 6. junija 2018 odločil, da bo izvršnega direktorja razrešil odgovornosti s takojšnjim učinkom; pozdravlja imenovanje začasnega izvršnega direktorja, ki ni predmet preiskave OLAF; obžaluje pa, da upravni odbor tega ukrepa na lastno pobudo ni sprejel veliko prej v postopku, s čimer bi se izognili zamudi v postopku razrešnice;
Welcomes the action already undertaken by the ad interim executive director in order to improve the governance structure of the Office, restore transparency and build trust; underlines the importance of counteracting the previously detected deficiencies in the legality and regularity of transactions; calls on the Office to prepare a comprehensive and detailed roadmap presenting the way forward; furthermore, calls on the Office in this respect to include in the roadmap a clear plan for restoring trust in management, especially bearing in mind that competent and effective management is key in view of the challenges the Office is facing in general, and, in particular, to make sure that the recruitment and training of the significant number of new staff foreseen for 2018 and 2019 is of such a level that the Office will have well-motivated and high quality personnel at its disposal and that there will be less turn-over of staff and its knowledge and experience are retained;
pozdravlja ukrep, ki ga je začasni izvršni direktor že sprejel za izboljšanje upravne strukture urada, ponovno vzpostavitev preglednosti in krepitev zaupanja; poudarja pomen preprečevanja predhodno ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo transakcij; poziva urad, naj pripravi celovit in podroben časovni načrt, v katerem bo predstavil nadaljnje korake; poleg tega urad v zvezi s tem poziva, naj v časovni načrt vključi jasen načrt za ponovno vzpostavitev zaupanja v upravljanje, zlasti ob upoštevanju, da je pristojno in učinkovito upravljanje ključnega pomena glede na izzive, s katerimi se sooča urad na splošno, ter naj zlasti zagotovi, da bosta zaposlovanje in usposabljanje znatnega števila novih uslužbencev, predvidena za leti 2018 in 2019, na taki ravni, da bo imel urad na voljo dobro motivirano in visoko kakovostno osebje ter da bodo menjave zaposlenih manjše, njihovo znanje in izkušnje pa ohranjeni;
Calls on OLAF to inform the discharge authority of the outcome of the investigation as soon as it is closed;
poziva OLAF, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice seznani z rezultati preiskave, takoj ko bo zaključena;
Calls on Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control to integrate the findings from the OLAF report in the Office's 2017 discharge report and, by doing so, to ensure that possible new recommendations to the Office are fully implemented;
poziva odbor Parlamenta za proračunski nadzor, naj ugotovitve iz poročila OLAF vključi v poročilo o razrešnici urada za leto 2017 in tako zagotovi, da se morebitna nova priporočila uradu v celoti izvedejo;
Basis for the qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions
Osnova za mnenje s pridržkom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij
Recalls the material findings made by the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’) in relation to two out of five significant procurement procedures from 2016 for which payments were incurred during that year, which demonstrate a lack of rigour in the Office's procurement procedures;
opozarja na pomembne ugotovitve Računskega sodišča v zvezi z dvema od petih bistvenih postopkov javnega naročanja iz leta 2016, za katera so bila plačila izvršena med letom, kar priča o pomanjkanju doslednosti pri javnih naročilih urada;
Expects all possible actions to be taken to recover irregular payments from the 2016 budget year: EUR 920561 (procurement procedure for the provision of travel services) and EUR 592273 (framework contract for interim services to support it in its response to the migration crisis);
pričakuje, da bodo izvedeni vsi možni ukrepi za izterjavo nepravilnih plačil iz proračunskega leta 2016: 920561 EUR (postopek javnega naročanja za potovalne storitve) in 592273 EUR (okvirna pogodba za začasne storitve za podporo pri odzivanju na migracijsko krizo);
Remains concerned by the development of travel reimbursement costs; notes that reimbursements amounted to EUR 997506 in 2014, EUR 987515 in 2015 and EUR 1012147 in 2016; notes that attendees that fall into category A have specific tasks to fulfil during meetings; notes the decrease of category-A reimbursements, which dropped from 69 % in 2014 to 52 % in 2015 and 37 % in 2016; is concerned by the apparent discrepancy between an increased workload for the Office and less category-A attendees; underlines that the increase of travel cost reimbursements and the decrease of category-A attendees may indicate an arbitrary reimbursement scheme;
ostaja zaskrbljen zaradi stanja na področju povračila potnih stroškov; ugotavlja, da so povrnjena sredstva znašala 997506 EUR leta 2014, 987515 EUR leta 2015, in 1012147 EUR leta 2016; ugotavlja, da imajo udeleženci, ki spadajo v kategorijo A, posebne naloge, ki se izvajajo na sestankih; je seznanjen z zmanjšanjem povračil za kategorijo A, in sicer z 69 % v letu 2014 na 52 % v letu 2015 in na 37 % v letu 2016; je zaskrbljen zaradi očitnega neskladja med večjo delovno obremenitvijo urada in manjšim številom udeležencev kategorije A; poudarja, da bi lahko povečanje povračil potnih stroškov in zmanjšanje udeležencev kategorije A nakazovalo samovoljno shemo povračil;
Notes, again, that the Office's work programme includes its operational support activities in ‘hotspots’ in some Member States; underlines the importance of this activity and stresses the wider consequences for the entire Union if tasks are not duly planned, managed and executed; strongly urges the staff of the Office to properly assume their responsibilities regarding administrative matters and on-the-ground work;
ponovno je seznanjen s tem, da delovni program urada vključuje operativne podporne dejavnosti na „žariščnih točkah“ v nekaterih državah članicah; poudarja pomen te dejavnosti in poudarja širše posledice za celotno Unijo, če naloge niso pravilno načrtovane, upravljane in izvršene; odločno poziva uslužbence urada, naj ustrezno prevzamejo svoje odgovornosti v zvezi z upravnimi zadevami in delom na terenu;
Regrets the harm caused to the Office's image by the errors found in the aforementioned procurement procedures; reiterates that effective control can only be assured when there is full transparency in these procedures;
obžaluje škodo, ki jo je podoba urada utrpela zaradi napak, ugotovljenih v zgoraj navedenih postopkih javnega naročanja; ponovno poudarja, da je učinkovit nadzor mogoče zagotoviti le, če v teh postopkih obstaja popolna preglednost;
Welcomes the action plans drawn up by the Office to remedy the issues identified by the Court, namely:
pozdravlja akcijske načrte, ki jih je pripravil urad, da bi odpravil zadeve, ki jih je ugotovilo Računsko sodišče, in sicer:
the procurement procedure for the provision of travel services (FCM Travel Agency) was replaced by an open tender procedure which was finalised and led to the conclusion of a new contract;
postopek za oddajo javnih naročil za zagotavljanje potovalnih storitev (potovalna agencija FCM) je bil nadomeščen z odprtim razpisnim postopkom, ki je bil zaključen in je privedel do sklenitve nove pogodbe,
the framework contract for interim services in Greece (Randstad) was replaced by an open tender procedure which was finalised and led to the conclusion of a new contract;
okvirna pogodba za začasne storitve v Grčiji (Randstad) je bila nadomeščena z odprtim razpisnim postopkom, ki je bil zaključen in je privedel do sklenitve nove pogodbe;
Welcomes the measures taken by the Office to strengthen procurement procedures, in particular the addition of senior staff and additional support staff to the procurement sector;
pozdravlja ukrepe, ki jih je urad sprejel za izboljšanje postopkov javnega naročanja, zlasti vključitev višjega osebja in dodatnega podpornega osebja v sektor javnega naročanja;
Refers, for other observations of a cross-cutting nature accompanying its decision on discharge, to its resolution of 18 April 2018 on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.
sporoča, da so druge ugotovitve horizontalne narave, ki spremljajo sklep o razrešnici, zbrane v resoluciji z dne 18. aprila 2018 o uspešnosti, finančnem poslovodenju in nadzoru agencij.
OJ L 248, 3.10.2018, p. 393.
UL L 248, 3.10.2018, str. 393.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision
Odločba Nadzornega organa EFTA
No 262/02/COL
št. 262/02/COL
of 18 December 2002
z dne 18. decembra 2002
amending for the thirty-fifth time the Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid by introducing new guidelines relating to the methodology for analysing state aid linked to stranded costs
o petintrideseti spremembi procesnih in materialnih pravil na področju državne pomoči z uvedbo novih smernic v zvezi z metodologijo za analizo državne pomoči, povezane z nasedlimi stroški
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY,
NADZORNI ORGAN EFTE JE –
HAVING REGARD TO the Agreement on the European Economic Area [1], in particular to Articles 61 to 63 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [1], in zlasti členov 61 do 63 Sporazuma,
HAVING REGARD TO the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice [2], in particular to Article 24 and Article 1 of Protocol 3 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča [2], ter zlasti člena 24 Sporazuma in člena 1 Protokola k Sporazumu,
WHEREAS under Article 24 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall give effect to the provisions of the EEA Agreement concerning State aid,
KER v skladu s členom 24 Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču nadzorni organ Efte uveljavlja določbe Sporazuma EGP v zvezi z državno pomočjo,
WHEREAS under Article 5(2)(b) of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall issue notices or guidelines on matters dealt with in the EEA Agreement, if that Agreement or the Surveillance and Court Agreement expressly so provides or if the EFTA Surveillance Authority considers it necessary,
KER v skladu s členom 5(2)(b) Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču nadzorni organ Efte izdaja obvestila ali smernice o zadevah, ki jih obravnava Sporazum EGP, če to izrecno določata navedeni sporazum ali Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču ali če nadzorni organ Efte meni, da je to potrebno,
RECALLING the Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid [3] adopted on 19 January 1994 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority [4],WHEREAS, on 26 July 2001, the European Commission adopted a Communication setting out the principles on which it will analyse State aid linked to stranded costs in the electricity sector [5],
OB SKLICEVANJU na procesna in materialna pravila na področju državne pomoči [3], ki jih je 19. januarja 1994 sprejel nadzorni organ Efte [4],KER je 26. julija 2001 Evropska komisija sprejela Sporočilo o določitvi pravil, po katerih bo analizirala državne pomoči, povezane z nasedlimi stroški v sektorju za električno energijo [5],
WHEREAS this Communication is also of relevance for the European Economic Area,
KER to sporočilo velja tudi za Evropski gospodarski prostor,
WHEREAS a uniform application of the EEA State aid rules is to be ensured throughout the European Economic Area,
KER je treba zagotoviti enotno uporabo pravil EGP o državni pomoči v celotnem Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru,
WHEREAS, according to point II under the heading ‘GENERAL’ at the end of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority is to adopt, after consultation with the Commission, acts corresponding to those adopted by the EC Commission, in order to maintain equal conditions of competition,
KER naj bi v skladu s točko II pod naslovom „SPLOŠNO“ na koncu Priloge XV k Sporazumu EGP nadzorni organ Efte po posvetovanju s Komisijo sprejel akte, ki ustrezajo tistim, ki jih je sprejela Evropska komisija, da bi se ohranili enaki pogoji konkurence,
HAVING consulted the European Commission,
PO POSVETOVANJU z Evropsko komisijo,
RECALLING that the EFTA Surveillance Authority has consulted the EFTA States in a multilateral meeting on 19 October 2001 on the subject,
OB SKLICEVANJU na to, da se je nadzorni organ Efte o tej temi posvetoval z državami Efte na večstranskem sestanku dne 19. oktobra 2001 –
The State Aid Guidelines shall be amended by adding a new Chapter 21; Methodology for analysing State aid linked to stranded costs.
Smernice o državni pomoči se spremenijo tako, da se doda novo poglavje 21; Metodologija za analizo državne pomoči, povezane z nasedlimi stroški.
The new chapter is contained in Annex I to this Decision.
Novo poglavje je objavljeno v Prilogi I k tej odločbi.
The EFTA States shall be informed by means of a letter, including a copy of the Decision and Annex I. The EFTA States shall be requested to signify their agreement to the proposed appropriate measure (reporting obligation in point 21.4.(5)(c)) as set out in Annex I within 20 working days from the date on which the letter is notified to them.
Države Efte se obvestijo z dopisom, ki vsebuje izvod Odločbe in Priloge I. Države Efte sporočijo svoje soglasje k predlaganemu ustreznemu ukrepu (obveznost poročanja iz točke 21.4 (5)(c)), kakor je določeno v Prilogi I, v 20 delovnih dneh od datuma prejema tega dopisa.
The European Commission shall be informed, in accordance with point (d) of Protocol 27 of the EEA Agreement, by means of a copy of this Decision, including Annex I.
3. Evropska komisija se obvesti z izvodom te odločbe skupaj s Prilogo I v skladu s točko (d) Protokola 27 k Sporazumu EGP.
The Decision, including Annex I, shall be published in the EEA Section of and the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Communities after the EFTA States have signified their agreement to the appropriate measures.
Ta odločba se skupaj s Prilogo I objavi v oddelku EGP in Dopolnilu EGP Uradnega lista Evropskih skupnosti, po tem ko so države Efte sporočile svoje soglasje k ustreznemu ukrepu.
The Decision shall be authentic in the English language.
Ta odločba je verodostojna v angleškem jeziku.
Done at Brussels, 18 December 2002.
V Bruslju, 18. decembra 2002
For the EFTA Surveillance Authority
Za nadzorni organ Efte
Hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement.
V nadaljnjem besedilu „Sporazum EGP“.
Hereinafter referred to as the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
V nadaljnjem besedilu „Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču“.
Hereinafter referred to as the State Aid Guidelines.
V nadaljnjem besedilu „Smernice o državni pomoči“.
Initially published in OJ L 231, 3.9.1994, EEA Supplement No 32.
Prvotno objavljena v UL L 231, 3.9.1994, v Dopolnilu EGP št. 32.
The Communication is available on the Commission’s website:http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/legislation/stranded_costs/en.pdf
Sporočilo je na voljo na spletni strani Komisije:http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/legislation/stranded_costs/en.pdf
METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSING STATE AID LINKED TO STRANDED COSTS
METODOLOGIJA ZA ANALIZO DRŽAVNE POMOČI, POVEZANE Z NASEDLIMI STROŠKI
European Parliament and Council Directive 96/92/EC of 19 December 1996 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity [1] (hereinafter referred to as “the Directive” or “Directive 96/92/EC”) laid down the principles for opening up the European electricity industry to competition.
Direktiva 96/92/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. decembra 1996 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z električno energijo [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu ‚Direktiva’ ali ‚Direktiva 96/92/ES’) je določila načela za odprtje evropske industrije električne energije za konkurenco.
The abovementioned Directive was incorporated into the EEA Agreement by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 168/1999 [2].
Zgoraj navedena direktiva je bila vključena v Sporazum EGP s Sklepom skupnega odbora EGP št. 168/1999 [2].
The gradual transition from a situation of largely restricted competition to one of genuine competition at EEA level must take place under acceptable economic conditions that take account of the specific characteristics of the electricity industry.
Postopni prehod iz položaja zelo omejene konkurence v položaj resnične konkurence na ravni EGP se mora zgoditi pod sprejemljivimi ekonomskimi pogoji, ki upoštevajo posebne značilnosti industrije električne energije.
This concern is already reflected to a very large extent in the text of the Directive itself.
Ta potreba se v veliki meri odraža že v samem besedilu Direktive.
In order to enable them to cope with a number of very specific situations, Article 24 of the Directive allows EFTA States to defer application of some of the provisions of the Directive for a transitional period.
Da bi omogočil obvladovanje številnih zelo posebnih položajev, člen 24 Direktive državam Efte dovoljuje odložitev izvajanja nekaterih določb Direktive za prehodno obdobje.
State aid mechanisms designed to allow electricity undertakings to adapt to the introduction of competition under favourable conditions do not fall within the scope of the derogations provided for in Article 24.
Mehanizmi državne pomoči, zasnovani zato, da elektroenergetskim podjetjem omogočijo, da se pod ugodnimi pogoji prilagodijo uvedbi konkurence, ne spadajo v področje uporabe odstopanj, določenih v členu 24.
The purpose of these Guidelines is to clarify how the Authority intends, in the light of Directive 96/92/EC, to apply the rules of the EEA Agreement to State aid of this kind.
Namen teh smernic je pojasniti, kako namerava organ ob upoštevanju Direktive 96/92/ES uporabljati pravila Sporazuma EGP za te vrste državne pomoči.
These Guidelines does not prejudice the rules on State aid that result from other relevant frameworks, guidelines and notices.
Te smernice ne posegajo v pravila o državni pomoči, ki izhajajo iz drugih zadevnih okvirov, smernic in sporočil.
In particular, the Authority will continue to authorize regional aid and environmental aid in accordance with the respective guidelines.
V skladu z zadevnimi smernicami bo organ še naprej odobril regionalno in okoljsko pomoč.
Similarly, aid that could not be authorized under Article 61 of the EEA Agreement will, where appropriate, be open to examination in the light of Article 59(2) of the EEA Agreement.
Podobno bo pomoč, ki je ni bilo mogoče odobriti v skladu s členom 61 Sporazuma EGP, kjer bo primerno, predmet proučitve ob upoštevanju člena 59(2) Sporazuma EGP.
TRANSITIONAL MEASURES AND STATE AID
PREHODNI UKREPI IN DRŽAVNA POMOČ
Article 24 of the Directive 96/92/EC, as adapted by Article 1(i) of Decision No 168/1999 of the EEA Joint Committee of 26 November 1999, stipulates that transitional measures derogating temporarily from the Directive may be authorized by the Authority [3]:
Člen 24 Direktive 96/92/ES, prilagojen s členom 1(i) Sklepa skupnega odbora EGP št. 168/1999 z dne 26. novembra 1999, določa, da prehodne ukrepe, ki začasno odstopajo od Direktive, lahko odobri organ [3]:
“Those EFTA States in which commitments or guarantees of operation given before the entry into force of Decision No 168/1999 of the EEA Joint Committee of 26 November 1999 may not be honoured on account of the provisions of that Decision, may apply for a transitional regime pursuant to Article 24(1) and (2).
‚Tiste države EFTE, kjer se obveznosti in zajamčeno obratovanje, ki so bili določeni pred začetkom veljavnosti Sklepa št. 168/1999 Skupnega odbora EGP z dne 26. novembra 1999, ne morejo izpolnjevati zaradi določb navedenega sklepa, lahko zaprosijo za prehodni režim na podlagi člena 24(1) in (2).