natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of Eurojust for the financial year 2014,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Eurojusta za proračunsko leto 2014,
A. whereas, according to its financial statements, the final budget of Eurojust for the financial year 2014 was EUR 33667239, representing an increase of 4,04 % compared to 2013; whereas the entire budget of Eurojust derives from the Union budget;
A. ker računovodski izkazi Eurojusta kažejo, da je njegov končni proračun v proračunskem letu 2014 znašal 33667239 EUR, kar je 4,04 % več kot leta 2013; ker celotni proračun Eurojusta izvira iz proračuna Unije;
B. whereas the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’), in its report on the annual accounts of the Eurojust for the financial year 2014 (‘the Court's report’), has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that Eurojust’s annual accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular;
B. ker je Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu o zaključnem računu Eurojusta za proračunsko leto 2014 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: poročilo Računskega sodišča) navedlo, da je prejelo razumno zagotovilo o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov Eurojusta ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij;
Acknowledges from Eurojust that:
je seznanjen s trditvami Eurojusta, da:
its college adopted a template for the declarations of absence of interest by the management board in June 2015,
je njegov kolegij junija 2015 sprejel predlogo za izjave o odsotnosti interesov upravnega odbora,
the Commission’s Internal Audit Service closed an outstanding recommendation rated as ‘very important’ from the financial year 2013,
je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo zaključila neuresničeno priporočilo, ki je bilo označeno kot „zelo pomembno“, iz proračunskega leta 2013,
its ‘Guidelines on the prevention and management of conflicts of interest’ were presented in October 2015 to the management board and subsequently adopted at the board’s meeting in January 2016;
so bile njegove „Smernice za preprečevanje in obvladovanje nasprotij interesov“ oktobra 2015 predložene upravnemu odboru in nato sprejete na seji tega odbora januarja 2016;
Notes with satisfaction that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year of 2014 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99,82 %, representing an increase of 0,21 % from 2013; ascertains that the payment appropriations execution rate was 87,31 %, representing a decrease of 2,34 % from 2013;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je stopnja izvrševanja proračuna zaradi proračunskega spremljanja v proračunskem letu 2014 znašala 99,82 %, kar je 0,21 % več kot leta 2013; ugotavlja, da je stopnja izvrševanja odobritev plačil znašala 87,31 %, kar je 2,34 % manj kot leta 2013;
Acknowledges Eurojust's statement that it has reduced the number of budget lines for its 2015 budget in order to reduce weaknesses in budget planning and implementation; notes furthermore that this exercise will continue for the 2016 and 2017 budgets;
je seznanjen z izjavo Eurojusta, da je zmanjšal število proračunskih vrstic v svojem proračunu za leto 2015, da bi zmanjšal pomanjkljivosti pri načrtovanju in izvrševanju proračuna; ugotavlja tudi, da bo do takega zmanjšanja prišlo tudi v proračunih za leti 2016 in 2017;
Notes with concern from the Court's report that the financial impact of salary adjustments and of the increase in the correction coefficient were not included in the initial budget for the financial year 2014; regrets that the shortfall in the salary budget of approximately EUR 1800000 required temporary reductions in operational expenditure and substantial transfers from administrative and operating budget lines at year-end; notes that this shortfall was partly balanced by an amending budget providing an additional EUR 1200000 to Eurojust and that commitments were made to advance with the implementation of the planned projects;
je zaskrbljen zaradi navedb v poročilu Računskega sodišča, da finančni učinki prilagoditve plač in povečanja korekcijskega koeficienta niso bili vključeni v začetni proračun za proračunsko leto 2014; obžaluje, da je primanjkljaj v proračunu plač v višini približno 1800000 EUR zahteval začasno zmanjšanje operativnih odhodkov in večje prerazporeditve iz upravnih in operativnih proračunskih vrstic ob koncu leta; ugotavlja, da je bil ta primanjkljaj delno izravnan s spremembo proračuna, ki je Eurojustu zagotovila dodaten znesek 1200000 EUR, urad pa se je zavezal, da bo dosegel napredek pri izvajanju projektov;
Takes note of the fact that Eurojust provides grants from its own budget to support the joint investigation teams (JIT); notes, furthermore, that only 32,8 % was paid by the end of the year mainly due to the budget implementation depending on beneficiaries and their submitted claims for reimbursement, putting the budget execution at risk; calls on Eurojust to report to the discharge authority on the measures taken to address this issue and to provide better guidance to its beneficiaries;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da Eurojust zagotavlja nepovratna sredstva iz lastnega proračuna, s katerimi podpira skupne preiskovalne enote; ugotavlja tudi, da je bilo do konca leta izplačanega zgolj 32,8 % teh sredstev, in sicer predvsem zaradi tega, ker je izvrševanje proračuna odvisno od upravičencev in njihovih predloženih zahtevkov za izplačilo, zaradi česar je ogroženo izvrševanje proračuna; poziva Eurojust, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice seznani z ukrepi, ki jih je sprejel za obravnavo tega vprašanja, in zagotovi boljše smernice za svoje upravičence;
Notes from the Court's report that the overall level of committed appropriations was high at 99 %; notes however that the level of carry-overs for Title III was high at 35 %, representing an increase of 2 % compared with 2013; ascertains that the high level of carry-overs occurred mainly because of the temporary budget shortfall, where commitments could only be made late in the year and because of granting projects for JIT launched during the last months of 2014 for which payments were not due until 2015;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo iz poročila Računskega sodišča, da je bila skupna raven odobrenih sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti, visoka in je znašala 99 %; vendar ugotavlja, da je bila stopnja prenosov v naslovu III visoka in je znašala 35 %, kar je 2 % več kot v letu 2013; ugotavlja, da je do visoke stopnje prenosov prišlo predvsem zaradi začasnega proračunskega primanjkljaja, saj je bilo mogoče obveznosti prevzeti šele proti koncu leta, in zaradi nakazovanja nepovratnih sredstev za projekte za skupne preiskovalne skupine, ki so se začeli v zadnjih mesecih leta 2014, plačila zanje pa so zapadla šele leta 2015;
Welcomes the fact that Eurojust will evaluate the use of differentiated appropriations to ensure the financing of its operational activities; notes moreover that this initiative is undertaken in consultation with the Commission’s Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers and the Directorate-General for Budget; invites Eurojust to report to the discharge authority on the results of this initiative and the measures taken;
pozdravlja, da bo Eurojust ocenil uporabo diferenciranih sredstev, da bi zagotovil financiranje svojih operativnih dejavnosti; ugotavlja tudi, da se ta pobuda izvaja ob posvetovanju z generalnima direktoratoma Komisije za pravosodje in potrošnike ter za proračun; poziva Eurojust, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o rezultatih te pobude in o sprejetih ukrepih;
Notes the efforts made by Eurojust to provide a more comprehensive procurement plan and urges Eurojust to publish the full list of contracts awarded;
je seznanjen s prizadevanji Eurojusta za oblikovanje bolj celostnega načrta javnih naročil in ga poziva, naj objavi popoln seznam oddanih pogodb;
Welcomes the detailed presentation of Eurojust's organisational structure, its members and administrative structures, as well as the publication of its code of administrative behaviour on the website;
pozdravlja podrobno predstavitev organizacijske strukture Eurojusta, njegovih članov in upravne strukture ter objavo njegovega kodeksa ravnanja javnih uslužbencev na spletnem mestu;
Prevention and management of conflict of interests and transparency
Preprečevanje in obvladovanje nasprotij interesov ter preglednost
Reminds Eurojust that it must adopt internal binding rules for the protection of whistle-blowers, in accordance with Article 22c of the Staff Regulations, which came into force on 1 January 2014;
opozarja Eurojust, da mora v skladu s členom 22(c) Kadrovskih predpisov, ki so začeli veljati 1. januarja 2014, sprejeti zavezujoče notranje predpise o zaščiti prijaviteljev nepravilnosti;
Asks Eurojust to provide the discharge authority with a track record of cases of conflicts of interest identified, and to establish strict and clear rules against ‘revolving doors’;
poziva Eurojust, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice zagotovi evidenco ugotovljenih primerov nasprotij interesov ter določi stroga in jasna pravila za preprečevanje izmeničnega zaposlovanja v javnem in zasebnem sektorju;
Ascertains from Eurojust that the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS) carried out risk assessments in 2014 and that the results of these assessments have been used by the IAS as the basis for its 2014‐2016 Strategic Internal Audit Plan as well as by Eurojust for identifying possible further improvements to administrative processes; acknowledges the actions taken by Eurojust regarding the implementation of internal control standards related to ethical and organisational values as well as to the risk management process;
na podlagi trditev Eurojusta ugotavlja, da je služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo leta 2014 opravila oceno tveganja in da je ta služba rezultate te ocene uporabila kot osnovo za svoj strateški načrt notranje revizije za obdobje 2014–2016, Eurojust pa jih je uporabil za opredelitev morebitnih izboljšav upravnih procesov; ugotavlja, da so ukrepi Eurojusta glede izvajanja standardov notranje kontrole povezani z etičnimi in organizacijskimi vrednotami, pa tudi s procesom obvladovanja tveganja;
Acknowledges Eurojust's observation that no critical recommendations were issued by the IAS during 2014; notes, furthermore, that the IAS issued an ‘outstanding’ recommendation from the year 2013 in the first quarter of 2015; looks forward to the results of the review and calls on Eurojust to report to the discharge authority on the outcome;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo Eurojusta, da služba za notranjo revizijo v letu 2014 ni izdala kritičnih priporočil; ugotavlja tudi, da je služba za notranjo revizijo v prvem četrtletju leta 2015 izdala „neuresničeno“ priporočilo iz leta 2013; z zanimanjem pričakuje rezultate pregleda in poziva Eurojust, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o izidu;
Acknowledges Eurojust's statement that the ongoing issue identified by the Court in 2011 regarding the overlap of responsibilities between the administrative director and the college of Eurojust can only be resolved by the legislative authority in the ongoing legislative procedure for a new Eurojust regulation [1]; believes that this future regulation should be adopted in line with the PIF directive [2] and the EPPO regulation [3]; urges the legislative authority to proceed with the necessary reforms contained in these proposals for new legislation;
je seznanjen z izjavo Eurojusta, da lahko nerešeno vprašanje, ki ga je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo leta 2011 in se nanaša na prekrivanje pristojnosti med upravnim direktorjem in kolegijem Eurojusta, reši zgolj zakonodajni organ v okviru zakonodajnega postopka za novo uredbo o Eurojustu, ki je trenutno v obravnavi [1]; meni, da bi bilo treba ta predlog sprejeti v skladu z direktivo o finančnih interesih Unije [2] in uredbo o Evropskem javnem tožilstvu [3]; poziva zakonodajni organ, naj nadaljuje s potrebnimi reformami iz teh predlogov za novo zakonodajo;
Acknowledges Eurojust's statement that in 2014 it decided to suspend the projects stemming from its organisational structure review; notes that the new Eurojust regulation could address the issues related to governance which led to the initiation of both projects in the past;
je seznanjen z izjavami Eurojusta, da se je leta 2014 odločil začasno ustaviti projekte, ki izhajajo iz pregleda njegove organizacijske strukture; ugotavlja, da bi lahko nova uredba o Eurojustu obravnavala vprašanja v zvezi z upravljanjem, zaradi katerih sta bila v preteklosti začeta oba projekta;
Welcomes the annual learning plan established in 2014 to cover the professional needs of staff as well as the establishment of a competency framework with the purpose of reflecting the core and leadership needs of Eurojust; notes that the work on the draft competence framework advanced in 2014 was to be completed and made available to all staff in 2015; calls on Eurojust to provide the discharge authority with an update on the implementation of the competence framework;
pozdravlja letni načrt izobraževanja, pripravljen leta 2014 za kritje službenih potreb osebja, pa tudi vzpostavitev okvira pristojnosti, ki naj bi odražal temeljne in vodstvene potrebe Eurojusta; je seznanjen, da bi moralo biti delo v zvezi z osnutkom okvira pristojnosti, ki je bil predložen leta 2014, končano in na voljo vsemu osebju leta 2015; poziva Eurojust, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o izvajanju okvira pristojnosti;
Calls on those Union institutions and agencies which have introduced codes of conduct, including the European Parliament, to step up their implementation measures, such as checks of declarations of financial interests;
poziva tiste institucije in agencije Unije, ki so sprejele kodeks ravnanja, vključno z Evropskim parlamentom, naj pospešijo svoje izvedbene ukrepe, npr. preverjanje izjav o finančnih interesih;
Calls on Eurojust to enhance its procedures and practices aimed at safeguarding the financial interests of the Union and to actively contribute to a results-oriented discharge process;
poziva Eurojust, naj izboljša postopke in prakse za zaščito finančnih interesov Unije ter naj dejavno prispeva k ciljno usmerjenemu postopku razrešnice;
Recalls that according to Article 41a of the decision on the strengthening of Eurojust [4], before 4 June 2014 the college of Eurojust is to commission an independent external evaluation of the implementation of this decision and of the activities carried out by Eurojust; welcomes the publication of the final report [5] and acknowledges its eight strategic recommendations;
želi spomniti, da je moral v skladu s členom 41a sklepa o okrepitvi Eurojusta [4] njegov kolegij do 4. junija 2014 naročiti neodvisno zunanjo oceno izvajanja te odločitve in dejavnosti Eurojusta; pozdravlja objavo končnega poročila [5] in je seznanjen z njegovimi osmimi strateškimi priporočili;
Is of the opinion that further steps need to be taken both to tackle ethical issues relating to the political role of lobbies, their practices and their influence and to promote safeguards for integrity, in order to raise the level of transparency of lobbying activities; proposes that common rules governing the pursuit of lobbying activities within the Union institutions and agencies should be introduced;
meni, da so za večjo preglednost lobistične dejavnosti potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi za reševanje etičnih vprašanj, povezanih s politično vlogo lobijev, njihovimi praksami in njihovim vplivom, ter za spodbujanje jamstev z vidika integritete; predlaga, naj se uvedejo skupna pravila za izvajanje lobistične dejavnosti v institucijah in agencijah Unije;
Refers, for other observations of a cross-cutting nature accompanying its decision on discharge, to its resolution of 28 April 2016 [6] on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.
sporoča, da so druge ugotovitve horizontalne narave, ki spremljajo sklep o razrešnici, zbrane v resoluciji z dne 28. aprila 2016 [6] o uspešnosti, finančnem poslovodenju in nadzoru agencij.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) (COM(2013) 535, 2013/0256(COD)), dated 17 July 2013.
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o Agenciji Evropske unije za pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah (Eurojust), COM(2013)0535, 2013/0256(COD) z dne 17. julija 2013.
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law (COM(2012) 363, 2012/0193(COD)), dated 11 July 2012.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o boju proti goljufijam, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, z uporabo kazenskega prava, COM(2012)0363, 2012/0193(COD) z dne 11. julija 2012.
Proposal for a Council Regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (COM(2013) 534, 2013/0255(APP)), dated 17 July 2013.
Predlog uredbe Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega javnega tožilstva, COM(2013)0534, 2013/0255(APP) z dne 17. julija 2013.
Resolution (EU) 2016/1571 of the European Parliament
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta (EU) 2016/1571
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police Office (Europol) for the financial year 2014
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega policijskega urada za proračunsko leto 2014
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police Office for the financial year 2014,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega policijskega urada za proračunsko leto 2014,
A. whereas, according to its financial statements, the final budget of the European Police Office (the Office) for the financial year 2014 was EUR 84339820, representing an increase of 2,20 % compared to 2013;
A. ker računovodski izkazi Evropskega policijskega urada (v nadaljevanju: urad) kažejo, da je končni proračun urada v proračunskem letu 2014 znašal 84339820 EUR, kar je 2,20 % več kot leta 2013;
B. whereas the Court of Auditors (the Court), in its report on the annual accounts of the European Police Office for the financial year 2014 (the Court's report), has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Office’s annual accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular;
B. ker je Računsko sodišče v poročilu o zaključnem računu Evropskega policijskega urada za proračunsko leto 2014 (poročilo Računskega sodišča) navedlo, da je prejelo razumno zagotovilo o zanesljivosti zaključnega računa urada ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njim povezanih transakcij;
Notes with satisfaction from the Court’s report that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2014 improved significantly and resulted in a high budget implementation rate of 99,70 %, indicating that commitments were made in a timely manner; takes note that the payment appropriations execution rate was 93 %, indicating an increase of 2,80 % compared to the previous year;
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da so se prizadevanja za proračunsko spremljanje v proračunskem letu 2014 bistveno izboljšala, zaradi česar je bila stopnja izvrševanja proračuna visoka, in sicer 99,70 %, kar kaže, da so bile obveznosti prevzete pravočasno; ugotavlja, da je stopnja izvrševanja plačil znašala 93 %, kar je 2,80 % več kot leto poprej;
Observes that the total amount of committed appropriations carried over to 2015 decreased in comparison to previous years and amounted to EUR 5663960 (6,72 % of total appropriations); takes note from the Court’s report that the carry-overs were at EUR 1900000 (27 %) for Title II (administrative expenditure), representing a decrease of 14 % compared to the previous year; acknowledges that those carry-overs mainly related to modifications of the Office’s headquarters opened in 2011;
ugotavlja, da je bilo v leto 2015 prenesenih 5663960 EUR (6,72 % vseh odobrenih sredstev) odobrenih sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti, in da se je ta znesek v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti zmanjšal; na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da je bilo 1900000 EUR (27 %) sredstev prenesenih v naslovu II (upravni odhodki), kar je 14 % manj kot leto poprej; priznava, da so prenosi povečini povezani s spremembami na sedežu urada, ki se je odprl leta 2011;
Notes with concern from the Court’s report that the cancellation rate of the committed appropriations carried forward from 2013 was high at 22 %, representing an increase of 13 % compared to the previous year; acknowledges that these cancellations mainly related to delays in IT projects provided by external suppliers in the area of document and asset management as well as in the exchange of police data; acknowledges furthermore that these delays did not affect operational business delivery as existing IT solutions continued to be in use for the relevant systems; notes that, despite the delivery delay caused by external contractors, the actual nominal increase of unused carry-overs was EUR 0,9 million at the end of 2014;
na podlagi poročila Računskega sodišča zaskrbljeno ugotavlja, da je bila stopnja razveljavitve iz leta 2013 prenesenih odobrenih sredstev, za katera so bila prevzete obveznosti, visoka in je znašala 22 %, kar je 13 % več kot v letu poprej; priznava, da so se razveljavitve nanašale zlasti na zamude pri projektih informacijske tehnologije, ki so jih na področju upravljanja dokumentov in premoženja ter izmenjave policijskih podatkov izvajali zunanji izvajalci; prav tako priznava, da zamude niso vplivale na operativno delovanje, saj je za ustrezne sisteme urad še naprej uporabljal obstoječe rešitve na področju informacijske tehnologije; ugotavlja, da je kljub zamudam zunanjih izvajalcev dejansko nominalno povišanje neuporabljenih prenesenih sredstev ob koncu leta 2014 znašalo 0,9 milijona EUR;
Calls on the Office in future to keep the level of committed appropriations carried over as low as possible, in order to comply more effectively with its duties of transparency and accountability;
želi spomniti agencijo, da mora obseg v naslednje leto prenesenih odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti, v prihodnje ohraniti na najnižji možni ravni, da bi tako zagotovila preglednost in večjo odgovornost;
Ascertains that in 2014 the Office completed its organisation-wide review of the overall procurement process, with a view to refining the current internal organisational set-up; takes note that, as a result of the review, the Office established a ‘Procurement’ business area under the direct responsibility of the Deputy Director in charge of the Governance Department, leading to a centralised approach of key procurement stages as well as to the respective quality controls;
potrjuje, da je urad v letu 2014 opravil pregled vseh postopkov javnega naročanja znotraj celotne organizacije, da bi tako izboljšal trenutno notranjo ureditev v organizaciji; ugotavlja, da je urad na podlagi rezultatov pregleda vzpostavil poslovno področje javnega naročanja, za katerega je neposredno odgovoren namestnik direktorja, ki vodi oddelek za upravljanje, zaradi česar se uporablja centraliziran pristop k najpomembnejšim stopnjam javnega naročanja, pa tudi k ustreznemu nadzoru kakovosti;
Acknowledges from the Office that the tender criteria for its ongoing procurement procedures are published on its website, together with an annual overview of the completed contracts; takes note that the Office is to publish the procurement overview for the financial year 2015 by the end of June 2016 as required by the Financial Regulation;
je seznanjen z informacijo urada, da so razpisni pogoji za potekajoče postopke javnih naročil objavljeni na njegovem spletnem mestu, skupaj z letnim pregledom zaključenih javnih naročil; ugotavlja še, da bo urad pregled javnih naročil za proračunsko leto 2015 objavil do konca junija 2016, kot zahteva finančna uredba;