natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Award criteria
ugotavlja, da je skromen napredek in majhna uspešnost pomoči EU Kosovu delno posledica političnega vmešavanja kosovskih oblasti in pomanjkanja preglednosti in politične volje, majhnih finančnih zmogljivosti in omejenega vpliva civilne družbe;
Invites Member States to take the Court of Auditors’ findings and recommendations on board; encourages Member States to improve their multiannual national control plans to effectively perform their veterinary controls, to develop national guides that can contribute to prevention of the shortcomings identified by the Court of Auditors’ audit and to improve guidance and training addressed to food business operators;
se zaveda geografskih odstopanj pri vzpostavljanju pravne države na Kosovu, zlasti nezadostnega nadzora kosovskih oblasti v Prištini nad severnim delom ozemlja; poziva Komisijo, naj pri načrtovanju pomoči upošteva posebne izzive, s katerimi se sooča severni del Kosova;
Regrets the limited response of Member States to the Court of Auditors’ audit findings; regrets, for example, that in response to detected shortcomings in the key area of veterinary controls, only one of the four Member States concerned replied that they intended to take action;
priznava, da je treba povečati učinkovitost in uspešnost pomoči EU; zato poziva, da se okrepijo prizadevanja za racionalizacijo navzočnosti Unije v tej državi z boljšim usklajevanjem in povezovanjem med institucijami Unije in kosovskimi oblastmi;
Strongly encourages the Commission to improve its supervision of official controls in the food and feed sector and believes that Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9] on official feed and food controls is a step in the right direction;
pozdravlja sporazum med Kosovom in Srbijo za normalizacijo odnosov med državama, ki je bil podpisan 19. aprila 2013; odločno poziva obe strani, naj tudi v prihodnje ohranita konstruktivni pristop k izvajanju tega sporazuma, da bi opazno in trajno izboljšali odnose;
Urges the Commission, furthermore, to complete the follow-up of its earlier recommendations to Member States as a result of the review of the implementation of the 2004 hygiene package without further delay; calls on the Commission to improve its guidance and supervision of Member States’ preparation and implementation of the Multiannual National Control Plans and to take action improving its training actions;
se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da zaradi dejstva, da Unija nima enotnega stališča glede priznanja Kosova, pomembna spodbuda, ki jo pomeni pristop k EU, ni tako prepričljiva; v zvezi s tem omenja resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. aprila 2013 o procesu vključevanja Kosova v Evropsko unijo [12], ki preostalih pet držav članic spodbuja, naj priznajo Kosovo, ter jih poziva, naj po svoji moči pospešujejo gospodarske, socialne in politične odnose med svojimi državljani in državljani Kosova;
Strongly regrets the fact that owing to the decentralised management structure, no information is available about the numbers and percentages of the slaughter activities of slaughterhouses in line with Union hygiene legislation before the Sapard funding and of the slaughter activities after the implementation of Sapard-funded projects, thus making it impossible to fully assess the projects’ core effectiveness or real in- and output;
se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da so se spodbude in pogoji, ki jih uporabljata Komisija in Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD), doslej izkazali za malo koristni za napredek glede vprašanj, povezanih s pravno državo na Kosovu; zato poziva Komisijo, ESZD in države članice, naj poskrbijo, da bo njihov dialog o politikah s Kosovom, zlasti glede krepitve pravne države, povezan s spodbudami in prednostnimi pogoji;
Notes that a synthesis study of Sapard ex post evaluations financed by the Commission and carried out by KPMG (Hungary) concludes that in terms of support for meeting Union standards and the acquis communautaire ‘the most important impacts were reached in the field of hygiene, sanitary and veterinary conditions and environment’; notes, however, that this study is based on a beneficiary survey and that the impact of Sapard support under measure II (improving the processing and marketing of agricultural and fishery products) is deemed considerably higher for helping to meet Union environmental standards (97 % of beneficiaries reported a ‘certain impact’), compared to only a 46 % impact in the case of helping to become fully compliant with (all) relevant Union standards, including hygiene standards;
Del IX
Regrets that the approach chosen by the Commission for evaluating the Sapard programmes in Member States did not allow for either quantitative nor qualitative assessments for measuring the effectiveness of the Union funding, as well as limiting the programme level assessment options only to qualitative evaluation; regrets the absence of clear and specific criteria in the Sapard regulations for the support of slaughterhouses; invites the Commission to adhere to methods allowing for quantifiable objectives on both programme and measure levels;
posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 20/2012 z naslovom „Ali financiranje projektov za izgradnjo objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov uspešno pomaga državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU glede gospodarjenja z odpadki?“
Part V
pozdravlja posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča z naslovom „Ali financiranje projektov za izgradnjo objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov uspešno pomaga državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU glede gospodarjenja z odpadki?“ in potrjuje njegova priporočila;
Special Report No 15/2012 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Management of conflict of interest in selected EU agencies’
poudarja, da ugotovitve Računskega sodišča kažejo na različno in celo neučinkovito izvajanje projektov, ki so prejeli finančno podporo EU za objekte za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki, in sicer iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijskega sklada, natančneje:
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ report on the four selected agencies because they have the highest exposure to an impartiality risk, due to their significant decision-making powers in areas of vital importance to the health and safety of consumers; notes that this report is a result of Parliament asking the Court of Auditors to undertake a comprehensive analysis of the agencies’ approach to the management of situations where there are potential conflicts of interest; supports all the Court of Auditors’ recommendations;
od sedmih objektov za mehansko-biološko obdelavo je le eden prispeval k preusmerjanju z odlagališč, en objekt je dosegal različne ravni uspešnosti, medtem ko štirje objekti niso pomembno zmanjšali količine odpadkov, odloženih na odlagališča, en objekt pa ni deloval,
Points out that the agencies carry out technical, operational and regulatory tasks and play a vital role in implementing and raising the profile of Union policies; stresses the importance of the agencies being autonomous and independent;
v štirih od sedmih revidiranih kompostarn je bila proizvodnja komposta manjša od ciljne,
Notes that all the Union institutions, agencies and joint undertakings, without exception, are exposed to the risk of conflict of interest; stresses, nevertheless, the specific needs of the decentralised agencies in terms of conflict of interest management, given the broad diversity of actors involved in their work;
v osmih regijah v vzorcu je delež odloženih biološko razgradljivih odpadkov znašal od 31 % do 55 %, ker ti odpadki niso bili ustrezno obdelani,
Points out that the poor management of conflicts of interest may have a strong and lasting negative impact on the image of the Union institutions and on citizens’ confidence in their ability to serve the interests of society;
odgovorni organi v nobeni od osmih regij v vzorcu niso merili uspešnosti svojih kampanj za informiranje in niso opredelili nobene merljive ciljne vrednosti;
Recalls that Parliament postponed its approval of the 2010 accounts of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) [10] and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [11] partly due to what it considered to be an unsatisfactory management of conflict of interest;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da te ugotovitve Računskega sodišča zbujajo dvom o učinkovitosti Komisije pri upravljanju javnega denarja, in poziva Komisijo, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o razlogih za to situacijo in o tem, katera sredstva uporablja in/ali jih je predvidela za preprečevanje takih in podobnih neuspehov;
Regrets that there is currently no comprehensive Union regulatory framework dedicated to conflict of interest which would make it possible to impose comparable basic requirements in terms of independence and transparency applicable to all Union agencies;
opozarja Komisijo, da se ne bi smela osredotočati le na zakonitost in pravilnost porabe sredstev Unije, ampak tudi na uspešnost kot svoj glavni cilj; s tem v zvezi izraža pohvalo revizijskemu delu Računskega sodišča, zlasti za njegova posebna poročila, ki se osredotočajo na učinkovitost in uspešnost porabe sredstev EU;
Recognises the value of the OECD guidelines on managing conflicts of interest, which set an international benchmark on this issue; stresses, however, that although the OECD guidelines offer an international benchmark, they relate essentially to conflicts of interest concerning public sector employees and cannot, therefore, provide an adequate basis for an effective response in the case of potential conflicts of interests among the governing bodies and other bodies involved in the agencies’ work, such as management boards and expert panels; recognises, nevertheless, the value of the OECD’s toolkit, and especially the checklist for gifts and benefits etc., as well as recommendations made concerning penalties, the need to check the completeness and content of declarations of interests and the requirement to harness expertise and identify potential conflicts of interest;
meni, da bi morala biti finančna pomoč Unije povezana z doseganjem ciljev politike Unije glede gospodarjenja z odpadki; poziva države članice, naj vzpostavijo zanesljive zbirke podatkov o gospodarjenju z odpadki za spremljanje napredka pri doseganju ciljev Unije glede gospodarjenja z odpadki in za podkrepitev svojega poročanja Komisiji; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni zanesljivost podatkov, ki jih prejme iz držav članic;
Recalls that in July 2012, after three years of analysis and negotiations, the Commission, the Council and Parliament finally adopted the ‘Common Approach’, a political agreement concerning the future and the reform of the decentralised agencies; welcomes the fact that the Commission soon adopted thereafter a roadmap for the implementation of this Common Approach; notes that the prevention and management of conflicts of interest in the agencies was one of the Commission’s priority actions for 2013 but regrets that it intended to implement and launch this action alone;
v zvezi z načelom „povzročitelj plača“ poziva Komisijo, naj od držav članic zahteva uporabo znižanih stopenj pomoči, kadar cene za odvoz odpadkov, ki jih plačujejo gospodinjstva, ne pokrijejo stroškov delovanja in večine stroškov amortizacije pri gospodarjenju s komunalnimi odpadki, ter naj se pri odobritvi velikih projektov tudi sama drži tega načela.
Draws the Commission’s attention to the need for a common regulatory framework on this matter; stresses the importance of it being a concerted action and calls for Parliament to be closely involved; asks the Commission to respect the proposed deadline for implementing this action and to report to the discharge authority on its outcome by May 2014, attaching the relevant legislative proposals to its report;
poudarja pomen ločenega zbiranja odpadkov, vključno z biološko razgradljivimi odpadki, da bi dosegli največjo možno uspešnost objektov za gospodarjenje z odpadki in napredovali pri doseganju ciljev Unije glede gospodarjenja z odpadki; spodbuja države članice, naj v gospodarjenje z odpadki uvedejo ekonomske instrumente za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov in spodbujanje recikliranja, zlasti z dajatvijo za odlaganje odpadkov, shemami „plačaj, kolikor odvržeš“, in drugimi cenovnimi spodbudami za gospodinjstva;
Asks the Commission to bear in mind the need to maintain a balance between the risks and the benefits, in particular as regards the management of conflicts of interest on the one hand, and the objective of obtaining the best possible scientific advice on the other; notes with concern, furthermore, that the adoption of ethical standards, codes and guidelines does not guarantee the absence of conflicts of interest; observes that this will require the implementation of simple and applicable standards, together with regular and effective ex ante and ex post controls and clear sanctions, thereof, in the context of a culture of honesty, integrity and transparency;
poziva države članice, naj se osredotočijo na objekte za gospodarjenje z odpadki, kjer se obdelujejo odpadki, ločeni pri viru, in zagotovijo obdelavo komunalnih odpadkov pred odlaganjem na odlagališče; poudarja, da bi morala odlagališča imeti na voljo potrebna sredstva za zaprtje in upravljanje po zaprtju za vsaj 30 let, izračun zneska pa bi moral temeljiti na ustrezni metodologiji;
Notes that the Court of Auditors identified a number of significant shortcomings relating to post-employment issues (‘revolving doors’, ‘insider information’); stresses that this issue is not solely limited to the agencies; notes that in light of its impact on its image and on Union citizens’ trust, the Commission needs to address these issues without delay by means of action to be taken by both the agencies and by all Union institutions;
poziva države članice, naj namenijo več pozornosti ozaveščanju javnosti in spodbujanju udeležbe v shemah za gospodarjenje z odpadki, zlasti v zvezi z ločevanjem gospodinjskih odpadkov pri viru, in sistematično merijo rezultate akcij za ozaveščanje in izobraževalnih strategij;
Welcomes the European Ombudsman’s decision to conduct an own initiative inquiry into cases of ‘revolving door-type’ conflicts of interest in several recently reported cases at the Commission; echoes the warning issued by the Ombudsman to the effect that although the effective management of conflicts of interest is a key part of good governance and sound ethical conduct, not all problems relating to governance and ethics necessarily imply a conflict of interest, meaning that conflicts of interest need to be viewed within their strict limits and training and prevention strategies promoted in respect of conflicts of interest in Union institutions;
Del X
Expresses its concern at the fact that none of the four agencies selected managed conflicts of interest in a fully satisfactory manner at the time of the Court of Auditors’ analysis;
posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 21/2012 z naslovom „Stroškovna učinkovitost naložb kohezijske politike v energetsko učinkovitost“
Considers that the main added value of Special Report No 15/2012 of the Court of Auditors lies in the regular monitoring of the agencies’ progress as regards management and prevention of conflicts of interest; welcomes the fact that following the Court’s audits and Parliament’s review and approval procedures for the 2010 and 2011 discharges, significant improvements have already been implemented by the relevant agencies;
poudarja pomen energetske učinkovitosti glede na pomanjkanje fosilnih goriv in okoljsko škodo, ki jo povzročajo emisije ogljikovega dioksida; zato popolnoma podpira dejstvo, da je energetska učinkovitost del agende EU 2020;
Calls on the Court of Auditors to continue monitoring the measures put in place by the agencies to follow-up on its recommendations, to extend the scope of its audit to the other agencies and to present its observations in a special report on this matter in the near future; urges the agencies to continue to report to the discharge authority on the progress made in this area;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča o stroškovni učinkovitosti naložb kohezijske politike v energetsko učinkovitost kot nedavni primer revizije učinkovitosti;
Stresses the importance of coordination and the exchange of information and good practice between Union agencies; reiterates the important role of the network of agencies in coordinating information exchange, both among the agencies themselves and between the agencies and the Commission, the Court of Auditors and Parliament;
ugotavlja, da je bila revizija opravljena na Češkem, v Italiji in Litvi, tj. državah, ki so za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 iz Kohezijskega sklada in Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj prejele največ podpore, v absolutnem smislu, za ukrepe v zvezi z energetsko učinkovitostjo in ki so projektom na tem področju do leta 2009 tudi namenile največje zneske; ugotavlja, da je revizija vključevala štiri operativne programe in vzorec 24 projektov naložb v energetsko učinkovitost javnih stavb; priznava, da dodeljena sredstva za energetsko učinkovitost v okviru teh programov predstavljajo približno 28 % sredstev, ki jih je bilo treba nameniti za energetsko učinkovitost v obdobju 2000–2013;
Emphasises the importance of determining which agencies and which of their areas of operation are most at risk from conflicts of interest; welcomes, in that context, the review of the Transparency Register for lobby groups at the Union institutions and urges the Commission and the agencies to implement the measures stemming from that review concerning potential conflicts of interest;
poudarja načela gospodarnosti, uspešnosti in učinkovitosti, ki so določena v finančni uredbi; se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da bi morala biti vprašanja stroškovne učinkovitosti odločilni dejavnik pri odločitvah o javni porabi, ki se sprejemajo v okviru deljenega upravljanja;
Points out that a high-level of transparency is essential to mitigate risks of conflict of interest; calls on all the agencies to publish a list of their management boards members, management staff, external and in-house experts, together with their respective declarations of interest and curricula vitae on their websites; suggests, also, that the minutes of the meetings of their management boards should be systematically published;
se strinja, da bi morala biti temelj naložb ustrezna ocena potreb; je prepričan, da bi se morale prednostne naloge na ravni Unije odražati v nacionalnih in podnacionalnih načrtih za energetsko učinkovitost;
Notes that because of the austerity policies currently being pursued, staff cuts in public administrations and the outsourcing of tasks to the private sector are greatly increasing the risk of conflicts of interest; calls for a strengthening of the Union civil service;
podpira idejo, da bi moralo izvajanje finančne pomoči Unije temeljiti na kazalnikih uspešnosti, kot so strošek na enoto prihranjene energije, načrtovana vračilna doba in doba, ki jo je dosegel operativni program, ter ustvarjeni prihranki energije; meni, da bi morali te kazalnike redno spremljati; podpira zamisel, da bi morali kazalniki uspešnosti omogočiti primerljivost med državami članicami, tudi z uporabo enotne merilne enote in metodologije;
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendation calling on all Union institutions and decentralised bodies to examine whether the recommendations of its Special Report No 15/2012 are relevant and applicable to them;
ceni željo Računskega sodišča, da se določijo standardni stroški naložbe na enoto energije, ki bi naj bi se prihranila na nacionalni ravni ter v različnih sektorjih, kjer se rabi energija; seznanjen je z zaskrbljenostjo Komisije, da se stroški med državami znatno razlikujejo zaradi različnih cen opreme in različnih stopenj že uvedenih prihrankov; meni, da je treba to idejo še dodatno obravnavati;
Part VI
meni, da izredno dolge vračilne dobe za projekte, ki v povprečju znašajo 50 let, v nekaterih primerih celo 150 let, niso sprejemljive in tudi ne v skladu z načeli gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti;
Special Report No 16/2012 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States’
je seznanjen s stališčem Komisije, da je v primeru naložb v energetsko učinkovitost pri javnih stavbah treba uporabiti celostni pristop, in ne izvesti samo izboljšav energetske učinkovitosti, ampak jih raje upoštevati kot del splošne prenove, ki vodi k splošnim izboljšavam posamezne stavbe;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report on the effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States, and endorses its recommendations;
poudarja, da se lahko celovita politika energetske učinkovitosti popolnoma razvije samo po zaključku oblikovanja, pogajanj in potrditve programov za obdobje 2007–2013;
Believes that in future, income support should be directed to active farmers who engage in agricultural activities; believes, in particular, that public entities managing state land and not otherwise involved in farming should be excluded from Single Area Payment Scheme (SAPS) income support; notes, with a view to the new CAP, that the Member States should ensure that aid is only paid to active farmers and that no derogations from this principle are applied; is of the opinion that the Commission should ensure that the rules are implemented consistently among Member States in order to ensure, for example, that the same types of beneficiary are excluded in all Member States;
poleg kazalnikov uspešnosti, ki so predlagani zgoraj in so bistvenega pomena za merjenje stroškovne učinkovitosti naložb v energetsko učinkovitost, podpira predlog Komisije za skupne kazalnike izložkov za naložbene prednostne naloge na področju energije in podnebnih sprememb, ki so bili vpeljani v okvirne [13] in sektorske uredbe za prihodnje programsko obdobje 2014–2020; meni, da bodo ti ukrepi okrepili načelo stroškovne učinkovitosti v okviru integriranega pristopa kohezijske politike;
Stresses that the eligibility of land for aid should be clearly defined and limited to parcels on which Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions (GAEC) standards require agricultural activities to be carried out; notes, with a view to the new CAP, that the eligibility of land should be clearly defined so as to exclude land that does not contribute to increasing agricultural productivity or to actively maintaining the environmental value of the land; believes, furthermore, that aid should only be paid for land on which well-defined and regular activities are carried out;
poudarja pomen, ki ga Parlament pripisuje vsebini, kot je zapisano v resoluciji z dne 25. novembra 2010 o poti k novi energetski strategiji za Evropo 2011–2020 [14] in resoluciji z dne 15. decembra 2010 o pregledu akcijskega načrta o energetski učinkovitosti [15];
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendation and the Commission’s proposal for a more balanced distribution of aid through several measures such as the progressive reduction and capping of direct payments and the regional allocation of national ceilings;
poudarja pomen Direktive 2012/27/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o energetski učinkovitosti [16], ki bo začela veljati 5. junija 2014;
Calls on the Commission to analyse the extent to which the effectiveness and efficiency of direct payments are adversely affected by structural weaknesses and land prices; believes that on the basis of this analysis, the Commission should take complementary measures to restructure the sector and render it more competitive;
podpira idejo energetskih pregledov, ki so primerno orodje za zagotavljanje prihrankov energije, zlasti v gradbeništvu in industriji; ugotavlja, da energetski pregledi v javnem sektorju niso obvezni in so jih uvedle samo nekatere države članice; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predloge za obvezne energetske preglede v javnem sektorju, ki naj bi bili pogoj za sofinanciranje projektov iz proračuna Unije;