natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Authority observes that as a result of the increase in social security costs, an additional NOK 7,352 million was paid out to the Hurtigruten companies in 2004.
Nadzorni organ ugotavlja, da je bilo zaradi povišanja stroškov socialnega zavarovanja leta 2004 podjetjema Hurtigruten izplačanih dodatnih 7,352 milijona NOK.
This represented an increase, and therefore also an alteration, to the State aid to the Hurtigruten companies authorised in the Authority’s 2001 Decision.
To je pomenilo povišanje in zato tudi spremembo državne pomoči podjetjema Hurtigruten, ki jo je Nadzorni organ odobril v Odločbi iz leta 2001.
Pursuant to Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, ‘the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall be informed, in sufficient time to enable it to submit its comments, of any plans to grant or alter aid (…).
V skladu s členom 1(3) dela I Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču „je Nadzorni organ Efte pravočasno obveščen, kar mu omogoča, da lahko predloži pripombe na katere koli načrte izvedbe ali spremembe pomoči […].
The State concerned shall not put its proposed measures into effect until the procedure has resulted in a final decision’.
Zadevna država ne sme izvajati svojih predlaganih ukrepov, dokler v tem postopku ni sprejeta dokončna odločitev.“
As stated above, the Authority considers the aid to the Hurtigruten companies to be new aid within the meaning of Article 1(c) in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, Nadzorni organ meni, da je pomoč podjetjema Hurtigruten nova pomoč v smislu člena 1(c) dela II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
This implies that the compensation should have been notified to the Authority, according to Article 1(3) in Part I and Article 2 in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, and should not have been put into effect unless and until the Authority approved the compensation.
To pomeni, da bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 1(3) dela I in členom 2 dela II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču nadomestilo priglasiti Nadzornemu organu ter se ne bi smelo izvajati, dokler ga Nadzorni organ ne bi odobril.
The Norwegian authorities, however, decided to grant the compensation in disregard of that obligation.
Norveški organi so se odločili odobriti nadomestilo, pri čemer niso upoštevali te obveznosti.
The compensation is therefore considered as ‘unlawful aid’within the meaning of Article 1(f) in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Nadomestilo se zato šteje kot „nezakonita pomoč“ v smislu člena 1(f) dela II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču.
As described in Section I.3 above, NOK 7,352 million (approximately EUR 900000) was granted to the Hurtigruten companies in order to compensate for their increased costs in relation to social security contributions for the year 2004.
Kot je opisano v oddelku I.3 zgoraj, je bilo 7,352 milijona NOK (približno 900000 EUR) odobrenih podjetjema Hurtigruten za nadomestitev njunih povišanih stroškov, povezanih s prispevki za socialno varnost za leto 2004.
According to the State Budget for 2004, this grant to the Hurtigruten companies consisted of compensation ‘as a consequence of amendments to the system concerning differentiated social security contributions’ [16].
V skladu z državnim proračunom za leto 2004 je to pomoč podjetjema Hurtigruten sestavljalo nadomestilo „zaradi sprememb sistema diferenciranih prispevkov za socialno varnost“ [16].
It follows from the above that the aid was granted to the Hurtigruten companies in order to reimburse them for increased social security contributions made by them in 2004.
Iz zgoraj navedenega sledi, da je bila pomoč podjetjema Hurtigruten odobrena za povrnitev povišanih prispevkov za socialno zaščito, ki sta jih plačali leta 2004.
Thus the aid granted must be considered as reimbursement of contributions for social protection of seafarers in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of Section 3.2 of the Maritime Transport Guidelines.
Zato je treba odobreno pomoč šteti kot povračilo prispevkov za socialno zaščito pomorščakov v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3 oddelka 3.2 Smernic za pomorski promet.
Guidelines on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, adopted and issued by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 19 January 1994, published in OJ L 231, 3.9.1994, p. 1, and in EEA Supplement No 32 of 3.9.1994.
Smernice o uporabi in razlagi členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma EGP ter člena 1 Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, ki jih je sprejel in izdal Nadzorni organ Efte 19. januarja 1994, objavljene v UL L 231, 3.9.1994, str. 1, in v Dopolnilu EGP št. 32, 3.9.1994.
The Guidelines were last amended on 3 May 2007.
Smernice so bile nazadnje spremenjene 3. maja 2007.
No 1/2007/SC
št. 1/2007/SC
amending Decision of the Standing Committee No 5/2004/SC establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism
o spremembi Sklepa Stalnega odbora držav EFTE št. 5/2004/SC o vzpostavitvi načela delitve stroškov za finančni mehanizem EGP
Having regard to Protocol 38a on the EEA Financial Mechanism inserted into the EEA Agreement by the Agreement on the participation of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic in the European Economic Area, and amended by the Agreement on the participation of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania in the European Economic Area,
ob upoštevanju Protokola 38a o finančnem mehanizmu EGP, ki je bil v Sporazum EGP vstavljen s Sporazumom o udeležbi Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Madžarske, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike v Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, in spremenjen s Sporazumom o udeležbi Republike Bolgarije in Romunije v Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru,
Having regard to the Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 5/2004/SC of 23 September 2004 establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 5/2004/SC z dne 23. septembra 2004 o vzpostavitvi načela delitve stroškov za finančni mehanizem EGP,
Having regard to the fact that Liechtenstein now is in the position to produce its own official data on Gross Domestic Product (GDP),
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da lahko Lihtenštajn odslej zbira lastne uradne podatke o bruto domačem proizvodu (BDP) –
Paragraph 6 and 7 of the Annex to the Decision of the Standing Committee No 5/2004/SC establishing a principle of cost sharing for the EEA Financial Mechanism shall be replaced by the following:
Odstavka 6 in 7 Priloge k Sklepu Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 5/2004/SC o vzpostavitvi načela delitve stroškov za finančni mehanizem EGP se nadomestita z naslednjim:
For Liechtenstein, the three most recent years for which data is available shall be used.’
Za Lihtenštajn se uporabijo zadnja tri leta, za katera so podatki na voljo.“
It shall apply for the first time for the tranche 2007-2008.
Prvič se uporabi za zneske v obdobju 2007–2008.
No 3/2007/SC
št. 3/2007/SC
on public access to EFTA documents and repealing Decision No 3/2005/SC of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States
o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov EFTE in o razveljavitvi Sklepa Stalnega odbora držav EFTE št. 3/2005/SC
Having regard to Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 3/2005/SC of 9 June 2005 on Public Access to Documents which is hereby repealed,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 3/2005/SO z dne 9. junija 2005 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov, ki se s tem sklepom razveljavi,
Any person may request access to EEA related documents (hereinafter referred to as documents) drawn up or received by the EFTA Secretariat which are in the EFTA Secretariat’s possession.
Katera koli oseba lahko zahteva dostop do dokumentov, povezanih z EGP (v nadaljnjem besedilu „dokumenti“), ki jih je sestavil ali prejel Sekretariat Efte in ki so v lasti Sekretariata Efte.
the public interest as regards: public security, defence and military matters, international relations, the financial, monetary or economic policy of an EFTA State,
javnega interesa, kar zadeva: javno varnost, obrambne in vojaške zadeve, mednarodne odnose, finančno, denarno ali gospodarsko politiko države Efte,
privacy and the integrity of the individual, in particular in accordance with the applicable national law of the EFTA States regarding the protection of personal data.
zasebnosti in integritete posameznika, zlasti v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo držav Efte glede varstva osebnih podatkov.
Access to a document containing opinions for internal use as part of deliberations and preliminary consultations shall be refused even after the decision has been taken if disclosure of the document would undermine the decision-making process.
Dostop do dokumenta, ki vsebuje mnenja za notranjo uporabo kot del razprav in predhodnih posvetovanj, se zavrne tudi po sprejetju odločitve, če bi razkritje dokumenta ogrozilo proces odločanja.
Applications for access to a document shall be made in any written form, including electronic form, in the English language and in a sufficiently precise manner to enable the EFTA Secretariat to identify the document.
Zahtevki za dostop do dokumentov se vložijo v kakršni koli pisni obliki, vključno z elektronsko, v angleškem jeziku in na dovolj natančen način, da lahko Sekretariat Efte ugotovi, za kateri dokument gre.
If an application is not sufficiently precise, the EFTA Secretariat shall ask the applicant to clarify the application and shall assist the applicant in doing so, for example, by providing information in accordance with Article 11.
Če zahtevek ni dovolj natančen, Sekretariat Efte vlagatelja zaprosi za razjasnitev zahtevka in mu pri tem pomaga, npr. s posredovanjem podatkov v skladu s členom 11.
In the event of an application relating to a very long document or to a very large number of documents, the EFTA Secretariat may confer with the applicant informally, with a view to finding a fair solution.
Če se zahtevek nanaša na zelo dolg dokument ali na zelo veliko število dokumentov, se lahko Sekretariat Efte z vlagateljem neuradno posvetuje o primerni rešitvi.
An application for access to a document shall be handled promptly.
Zahtevek za dostop do dokumenta se obravnava takoj.
If it is not possible for the EFTA Secretariat to give the applicant an answer within 12 working days from the registration of the application, the applicant shall be informed in writing of the delay and when the decision can be expected.
Če Sekretariat Efte vlagatelju ne more poslati odgovora v 12 delovnih dneh od evidentiranja zahtevka, se vlagatelja pisno obvesti o zamudi in o tem, kdaj lahko pričakuje odločitev.
Failure by the EFTA Secretariat to reply within reasonable time from registration of the application entitles the applicant to refer the request to the Standing Committee of the EFTA states.
Če Sekretariat Efte ne odgovori v razumnem času od evidentiranja zahtevka, lahko vlagatelj zahtevo predloži Stalnemu odboru držav Efte.
The cost of producing and sending copies may be charged to the applicant.
Strošek izdelave in pošiljanja kopij se lahko zaračuna vlagatelju.
The EFTA Secretariat shall keep a public register of documents related to the EEA Agreement drawn up by the EFTA Secretariat.
Sekretariat Efte vodi javni register dokumentov, povezanih s Sporazumom EGP, ki ga je sestavil Sekretariat Efte.
The register shall be accessible through its website.
Register je dostopen na njegovi spletni strani.
References shall be made in a manner which does not undermine protection of the interests in Article 3.
Napotila se pripravijo tako, da ni oslabljeno varstvo interesov iz člena 3.
Documents classified as ‘Confidential’ or ‘Strictly confidential’ shall not be placed on the public register except if the EFTA States agree to the contrary.
Dokumenti, opredeljeni kot „zaupni“ ali „strogo zaupni“, se ne smejo vnesti v javni register, razen če se države Efte ne dogovorijo drugače.
In addition, access to a list of EEA related documents drawn up or received by the EFTA Secretariat which are in the EFTA Secretariat’s possession shall be provided upon request.
Poleg tega se na zahtevo zagotovi dostop do seznama dokumentov, povezanih z EGP, ki jih je sestavil ali prejel Sekretariat Efte in ki so v lasti Sekretariata Efte.
The EFTA Secretariat shall provide information and assistance to citizens on how and where applications for access to documents can be made.
Sekretariat Efte državljanom zagotavlja podatke in pomoč o tem, kako in kje vložiti zahtevka za dostop do dokumentov.
Decision No 3/2005/SC of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States of 9 June 2005 is hereby repealed.
Sklep Stalnega odbora držav Efte št. 3/2005/SO z dne 9. junija 2005 se razveljavi.
This Decision shall take effect as of 1 April 2008.
Ta sklep začne veljati 1. aprila 2008.
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep se objavi v sklopu EGP Uradnega lista Evropske unije in Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije.
The Secretary General
Generalni sekretar
EEA related EFTA documents to be made available to the public on the internet
Dokumenti Efte, povezani z EGP, ki so javnosti na voljo prek spletnih strani
Original versions of the EEA Agreement, the Surveillance and Court Agreement and the Standing Committee Agreement
Izvirne različice Sporazuma EGP, Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču ter Sporazum o Stalnem odboru
Consolidated version of the Surveillance and Court Agreement
Prečiščeno besedilo Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču
EEA EFTA Comment
Pripomba EGP-EFTA
No 28/08/COL
št. 28/08/COL
on the Wood Scheme (Verdiskapningsprogrammet for tre) (Norway)
o Lesni shemi („Verdiskapningsprogrammet for tre“) (Norveška)
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY [1], Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [2], in particular Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26 thereof,
NADZORNI ORGAN EFTE JE [1] ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [2] ter zlasti členov 61 do 63 Sporazuma in Protokola 26 k Sporazumu,
Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice [3], in particular Article 24 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča [3] ter zlasti člena 24 Sporazuma,
Having regard to Article 1(2) of Part I and Articles 4(4), 6, 7(5), 13 and 14 of Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement,
ob upoštevanju člena 1(2) dela I in členov 4(4), 6, 7(5), 13 in 14 dela II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču,
Having regard to the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines [4] on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement, in particular the sections on regional aid and research and development aid,
ob upoštevanju Smernic Nadzornega organa o državni pomoči [4] glede uporabe in razlage členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma EGP, zlasti oddelkov o regionalni pomoči in pomoči za raziskave in razvoj,
Having regard to the block exemption Regulations on aid for training and aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) as well as the Regulation on de minimis aid [5],
ob upoštevanju uredb o skupinskih izjemah, in sicer o pomoči za usposabljanje in pomoči za mala in srednje velika podjetja („MSP“) ter Uredbe o pomoči de minimis [5],
Having regard to Decision No 147/06/COL of the Authority of 17 May 2006 to initiate the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 1(2) of Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Nadzornega organa št. 147/06/COL z dne 17. maja 2006 o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave iz člena 1(2) dela I Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to Article 6 of Part II of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement [6],
potem, ko je zainteresirane stranke pozval k predložitvi pripomb v skladu s členom 6 dela II Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču [6],
By letter dated 1 February 2005 (Event No 307555) the Authority received a complaint (the ‘Complaint’) from a trade association for the Norwegian masonry and concrete industry, ‘byggutengrenser.no’ (the ‘Complainant’).
Z dopisom z dne 1. februarja 2005 (št. dogodka: 307555) je Nadzorni organ prejel pritožbo („pritožba“) poslovnega združenja za norveško zidarstvo in betonsko industrijo „byggutengrenser.no“ („pritožnik“).
In the Complaint, which was both received and registered by the Authority on 3 February 2005, the Complainant alleges that the Norwegian State is granting State aid to the wood construction industry on the basis of ‘Verdiskapningsprogrammet for tre’, also referred to as ‘Treprogrammet’ (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Wood Scheme’).
V pritožbi, ki jo je Nadzorni organ prejel in evidentiral 3. februarja 2005, pritožnik trdi, da norveška država dodeljuje državno pomoč lesni industriji na podlagi „Verdiskapningsprogrammet for tre“, imenovanega tudi „Treprogrammet“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Lesna shema“).
By letter dated 17 May 2006 and following various exchanges of correspondence [7], the Authority informed the Norwegian authorities that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 1(2) of Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement in respect of the Wood Scheme.By letter dated 3 July 2006 from the Mission of Norway to the European Union, forwarding letters from the Ministry of Government Administration and Reform and the Ministry of Agriculture and Food, both dated 26 June 2006, the Norwegian authorities submitted comments.
Z dopisom z dne 17. maja 2006 in po izmenjavi različnih sporočil [7] je Nadzorni organ norveške organe obvestil, da je sklenil začeti postopek, določen v členu 1(2) dela I Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču v zvezi z Lesno shemo.Z dopisom z dne 3. julija 2006 od misije Norveške pri Evropski uniji, ki je posredovalo dopisa Ministrstva za javno upravo in reforme ter Ministrstva za kmetijstvo in prehrano, oba z dne 26. junija 2006, so norveški organi predložili pripombe.
The letters were received and registered by the Authority on 4 July 2006 (Event No 380386, hereinafter referred to as ‘Comments by the Norwegian authorities on the Decision to open the formal investigation procedure’).
Dopisa je Nadzorni organ prejel in evidentiral 4. julija 2006 (št. dogodka: 380386, v nadaljnjem besedilu „Pripombe norveških organov v zvezi z Odločbo o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave“).
Decision No 147/06/COL to initiate the formal investigation procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement thereto [8].
Odločba št. 147/06/COL o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in v Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu [8].
The Authority called on interested parties to submit their comments.
Organ je zainteresirane stranke pozval k predložitvi pripomb.
Finally, during the autumn of 2007, the Authority and the Norwegian authorities had informal contact via both telephone and electronic mail regarding the Wood Scheme.
Končno so Nadzorni organ in norveški organi jeseni leta 2007 vzpostavili neformalni stik po telefonu in elektronski pošti v zvezi z Lesno shemo.
Information received by the Authority in this context has been consolidated by the Norwegian authorities in a letter submitted electronically on 10 December 2007 by the Ministry of Government Administration and Reform (Event No 456845).
Informacije, ki jih je Nadzorni organ prejel v tem okviru, so norveški organi povzeli v dopisu, ki ga je Ministrstvo za javno upravo in reforme v elektronski obliki poslalo 10. decembra 2007 (št. dogodka: 456845).
Objective and administration of the Wood Scheme described in preparatory legislative works
Cilj in upravljanje Lesne sheme, opisane v pripravljalnih zakonodajnih delih
The White Paper of 1998-99
Bela knjiga iz leta 1998–99
The aim of the Wood Scheme is set out in a White Paper from the Government to the Parliament on the creation of value and opportunities within the forest sector (St. meld. nr. 17 (1998-99 ‘Verdiskapning og miljø — muligheter i skogssektoren’) — hereinafter referred to as the ‘White Paper’).
Cilj Lesne sheme je opredeljen v Beli knjigi vlade za parlament o ustvarjanju vrednosti in priložnostih v gozdarskem sektorju (St. meld. nr. 17 (1998–99) „Verdiskapning og miljø – muligheter i skogssektoren“) – v nadaljnjem besedilu „Bela knjiga“).
The aim of the White Paper was to establish a general policy for a rational and sustainable utilisation of forest resources and to increase the forest sector’s contribution to the national economy and the general development of Norwegian society.
Cilj Bele knjige je bil oblikovati splošno politiko za razumno in trajnostno izkoriščanje gozdnih virov ter povečati prispevek gozdarskega sektorja k nacionalnemu gospodarstvu in splošnemu razvoju norveške družbe.
The White Paper proposed the introduction of various measures in order to achieve this goal — one of which was the Wood Scheme.
Bela knjiga je predlagala uvedbo različnih ukrepov za dosego tega cilja – eden od teh je bila Lesna shema.
In this respect the White Paper proposed the establishment of a 5-year scheme aimed at creating value within the sector of woodwork and the (wood) processing business.
V zvezi s tem je Bela knjiga predlagala ustanovitev petletne sheme za ustvarjanje vrednosti v sektorju obdelave lesa in (lesno)predelovalne dejavnosti.
More specifically, the White Paper stipulated that the aim of the Wood Scheme should be to increase the creation of value in forestry and the (wood) processing business as well as to increase the contribution of the forest sector to achieving more sustainable production and consumption patterns [9].
Natančneje, Bela knjiga je predvidevala, da bi moral biti cilj Lesne sheme povečati ustvarjanje vrednosti v gozdarstvu in (lesno)predelovalni dejavnosti ter tudi povečati prispevek gozdarskega sektorja, da bi dosegli bolj trajnostno proizvodnjo in potrošnjo [9].
In that respect, the focus of the Wood Scheme should be on (i) improving the processing of woodwork; (ii) increasing the use of woodwork; and (iii) improving relations on different levels of trade between the forest sector and the market [10].
V okviru teh ciljev bi se morala Lesna shema osredotočati na (i) izboljšanje predelave lesa; (ii) povečanje uporabe lesa in (iii) izboljšanje odnosov na različnih stopnjah trgovine med gozdarskim sektorjem in trgom [10].
The White Paper also stated that the new scheme should focus on identifying possibilities in the areas of product development and design and architecture and that the scheme should pave the way for enabling woodwork to be considered as an attractive building material with a wide range of uses [11].
Bela knjiga je tudi navajala, da bi se morala nova shema osredotočiti na opredelitev možnosti na področjih razvoja izdelkov, oblikovanja in arhitekture ter da bi morala shema utreti pot, ki bi omogočila, da bi les bolj kot do sedaj veljal za privlačen gradbeni material z vrsto uporabnih namenov [11].
Finally, on a more general level, the White Paper pointed out that the aim of increasing value in the processing business for woodwork should be achieved domestically [12].Recommendation (1998-1999) and Working Group Report
Nazadnje je Bela knjiga na splošneje poudarila, da bi bilo treba cilj povečanja vrednosti v lesnopredelovalni industriji doseči interno (tj. na Norveškem) [12].Priporočilo (1998–1999) in Poročilo delovne skupine