natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is therefore clear that the three investment banks in question have now ceased all economic activity, their operating licences have been revoked, they are currently undergoing a winding-up procedure and the time limit for lodging claims to the banks’ estates has elapsed [13].
Zato je jasno, da so zadevne tri investicijske banke prenehale izvajati vsakršno gospodarsko dejavnost, da so bile njihove operativne licence preklicane, da so trenutno v postopku prenehanja in da je rok za prijavo terjatev na premoženje bank pretekel [13].
If State aid was granted to the investment banks, the aid no longer produces any distortive effects, and if illegal aid were granted, recovery of that aid would be impossible.
Če je bila investicijskim bankam odobrena državna pomoč, ta pomoč nima več izkrivljajočih učinkov, pri čemer bi bilo pomoč nemogoče izterjati, če je bila nezakonita.
Under these circumstances, a decision by the Authority on the classification as aid of the measures in question and on their compatibility with the EEA Agreement would have no practical effect [14].
V teh okoliščinah odločba Nadzornega organa o tem, da se zadevni ukrepi opredelijo kot pomoč, in o združljivosti ukrepov s Sporazumom EGP ne bi imela nobenega stvarnega učinka [14].
Continuing the formal investigation procedure initiated pursuant to Article 1(2) of Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court thus serves no useful purpose,
Nadaljevanje formalnega postopka preiskave, ki se je začel v skladu s členom 1(2) dela I Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, je torej brezpredmetno –
The formal investigation procedure concerning State aid granted to three Icelandic investment banks through rescheduled loans on preferential terms is herby closed.
Formalni postopek preiskave o državni pomoči, dodeljeni trem islandskim investicijskim bankam prek reprogramiranih posojil pod ugodnejšimi pogoji, se zaključi.
This Decision is addressed to Iceland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Republiko Islandijo.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 363/11/COL of 23.11.2011 to initiate the formal investigation procedure with regard to State aid granted to three Icelandic investment banks through rescheduled loans on preferential terms was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 26.1.2012 (OJ C 21, 26.1.2012, p. 2) and the EEA Supplement No 4, 26.1.2012, p. 8.
Odločba Nadzornega organa Efte št. 363/11/COL z dne 23. novembra 2011 o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave v zvezi z državno pomočjo, dodeljeno trem islandskim investicijskim bankam prek reprogramiranih posojil pod ugodnejšimi pogoji, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (UL C 21, 26.1.2012, str. 2) in v Dopolnilu EGP št. 4 (26.1.2012, str. 8).
See paragraphs 2-6 of the Authority’s Decision No 363/11/COL.
Glej odstavke 2–6 Odločbe Nadzornega organa št. 363/11/COL.
See footnote 1 above for publication references.
Glej opombo 1 za podatke o objavi.
Collateral loans are also named repo loans, where repos or repurchase agreements are contracts in which the seller of securities, such as Treasury bills, agrees to buy them back at a specified time and price.
Zavarovana posojila se imenujejo tudi posojila v okviru dogovora o ponovnem odkupu, pri čemer so posli začasne prodaje/začasnega nakupa (repo posli) ali dogovori o ponovnih odkupih pogodbe, v katerih prodajalec vrednostnih papirjev, kot so zakladne menice, soglaša, da jih bo v določenem času in po določeni ceni ponovno odkupil.
For further details see Rules on Central Bank of Iceland securities lending facilities on behalf of the Treasury for primary dealers dated 28 November 2008, available at: http://www.lanamal.is/assets/nyrlanasysla/regluren08.pdf
Za nadaljnje podrobnosti glej dokument Rules on Central Bank of Iceland securities lending facilities on behalf of the Treasury for primary dealers (Pravila o instrumentih za posojanje vrednostnih papirjev, s katerimi v imenu zakladnice upravlja Centralna banka Islandije, za primarne vpisnike) z dne 28. novembra 2008, ki je na voljo na naslovu: http://www.lanamal.is/assets/nyrlanasysla/regluren08.pdf.
Further details of the loan agreements are set out in Decision No 363/11/COL, paragraphs 11-27.
Nadaljnje podrobnosti sporazumov o preoblikovanju dolga so navedene v točkah 11–27 Odločbe št. 363/11/COL.
In particular, Part 2.2 of the Decision.
Zlasti del 2.2 Odločbe.
These rules were replaced on 26 June 2009 by Rules No 553 on the same subject (currently applicable rules).
Ta pravila so 26. junija 2009 nadomestila pravila št. 553 o istem vprašanju (trenutno veljavna pravila).
See for instance Case C-75/97 Belgium v Commission (Maribel bis/ter) [1999] ECR I-3671 as well as recent judgment in joined Cases C-106/09 P and C-107/09 P Commission v Government of Gibraltar, not yet reported, paragraph 75.
Glej na primer zadevo C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji (Maribel bis/ter), Recueil, str. I-3671, ter nedavno sodbo v združenih zadevah C-106/09 P in C-107/09 P, Komisija proti Government of Gibraltar, še ne objavljeno, točka 75.
See for instance the Authority’s recapitalisation guidelines available at: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=16015&1=1
Glej na primer smernice Nadzornega organa o dokapitalizaciji na spletni strani: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1&showLinkID=16015&1=1.
The Authority later received corresponding information from the complainant (Event No 641907).
Nadzorni organ je pozneje od pritožnika prejel ustrezne informacije (ev. št. 641907).
Commission Decision of 25 September 2007 on the aid measures implemented by Spain for IZAR, Case C 47/2003 (OJ L 44, 20.2.2008, p. 33), Commission Decision of 9 November 2005 on the measure implemented by France for Mines de potasse d’Alsace, Case C 53/2000 (OJ L 86, 24.3.2006 p. 20) and EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision of 27 May 2009 concerning alleged unlawful aid to the undertaking NordBook AS, Case 245/09/COL (OJ L 282, 29.10.2009, p. 41).
Odločba Komisije z dne 25. septembra 2007 o ukrepih pomoči, ki jih je Španija izvedla v korist podjetja Izar, zadeva C 47/2003 (UL L 44, 20.2.2008, str. 33); Odločba Komisije z dne 9. novembra 2005 glede ukrepa Francije za Mines de potasse d’Alsace, zadeva C 53/2000 (UL L 86, 24.3.2006, str. 20); in Odločba Nadzornega organa Efte z dne 27. maja 2009 o domnevni nezakoniti državni pomoči podjetju NordBook AS, zadeva 245/09/COL (UL L 282, 29.10.2009, str. 41).
It has to be noted that the time limit for stating claims to the winding-up boards of the three banks has expired: according to Article 85 of Act No. 21/1991 on Bankruptcy, the period for lodging claims shall generally be two months, but in exceptional circumstances the trustee may decide on a period of three to six whole months at the most.
Poudariti je treba, da je rok za prijavo terjatev odborom za prenehanje zadevnih treh bank potekel: v skladu s členom 85 zakona št. 21/1991 o stečaju je treba terjatve prijaviti v roku dveh mesecev, vendar lahko v izjemnih okoliščinah stečajni upravitelj obdobje podaljša na tri do največ šest celih mesecev.
Irrespective of its duration, the period for stating claims shall start when the notice to creditors is published for the first time, and this shall be clearly stated in the notice.
Ne glede na trajanje obdobja za prijavo terjatev začne rok teči, ko se prvič objavi obvestilo upnikom, kar je treba jasno navesti v obvestilu.
Therefore, a decision by the Authority ordering recovery of incompatible aid would in the present case be futile.
Zato bi bil sklep Nadzornega organa o izterjavi nezdružljive pomoči v obravnavanem primeru brezpredmeten.
Commission Decision of 25 September 2007 on the aid measures implemented by Spain for IZAR, Case C 47/2003 (OJ L 44, 20.2.2008, p. 33), and Commission Decision of 9 November 2005 on the measure implemented by France for Mines de potasse d’Alsace, Case C 53/2000 (OJ L 86, 24.3.2006, p. 20).
Odločba Komisije z dne 25. septembra 2007 o ukrepih pomoči, ki jih je Španija izvedla v korist podjetja Izar, zadeva C 47/2003 (UL L 44, 20.2.2008, str. 33), in Odločba Komisije z dne 9. novembra 2005 glede ukrepa Francije za Mines de potasse d’Alsace, zadeva C 53/2000 (UL L 86, 24.3.2006, str. 20).
The loan amounts were based on settlement of the respective liabilities in December 2008.
Zneski posojil so temeljili na poravnavi zadevnih obveznosti decembra 2008.
The repayment terms of the loans to Saga and VBS were identical.
Pogoji odplačevanja posojil bankama Saga in VBS so bili enaki.
Saga Capital’s operating licence was revoked by a decision of the FME of 28 September 2011.
Operativna licenca banke Saga Capital je bila preklicana s sklepom FME z dne 28. septembra 2011.
Subsequently, the FME demanded that a winding-up procedure of Saga Capital be initiated and a winding-up board appointed.
Nato je FME zahteval, da se začne postopek prenehanja banke Saga Capital in imenuje odbor za prenehanje.
The FME’s decision to revoke Saga Capital’s operating licence was upheld by a ruling of the Reykjavik District Court, dated 5 March 2012.
Sklep FME o preklicu operativne licence banke Saga Capital je v sodbi z dne 5. marca 2012 podprlo okrožno sodišče v Reykjaviku.
The ruling of the Reykjavik District Court has been appealed to the Supreme Court.
Zoper sodbo okrožnega sodišča v Reykjaviku je bila vložena pritožba na vrhovnemu sodišču.
However, given the fact that the Icelandic authorities did not comply with their notification obligation under Article 1(3) of Part I of Protocol 3 SCA, the Authority was not in a position to initiate the investigation of the measures earlier than it did by its Decision 363/11/COL, i.e. in November 2011.
Vendar glede na to, da islandski organi niso upoštevali svoje obveznosti priglasitve v skladu s členom 1(3) dela I Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, Nadzorni organ ni mogel začeti preiskave ukrepov pred novembrom 2011, ko je to storil z Odločbo št. 363/11/COL.
In any case, the Authority expects that the sale of the three investment banks’ assets will be conducted on market terms and in line with the general rules applicable in bankruptcy proceedings.
Nadzorni organ vsekakor pričakuje, da se bo prodaja premoženja treh investicijskih bank izvedla pod tržnimi pogoji in v skladu s splošnimi pravili, ki se uporabljajo v stečajnih postopkih.
No 522/12/COL
št. 522/12/COL
amending for the eighty-seventh time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of state aid by introducing a new chapter on state aid measures in the context of the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme post-2012
o sedeminosemdeseti spremembi procesnih in materialnih pravil na področju državne pomoči z uvedbo novega poglavja o ukrepih državne pomoči v okviru sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov po letu 2012
HAVING regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [1], in particular to Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26 thereof,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [1], zlasti členov 61 do 63 Sporazuma EGP in Protokola 26 k Sporazumu EGP,
HAVING regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice [2], in particular its Articles 5(2)(b) and 24,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU Sporazuma med državami Efte o ustanovitvi nadzornega organa in sodišča [2], zlasti člena 5(2)(b) in člena 24,
RECALLING the Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid adopted on 19 January 1994 by the Authority [3],
OB SKLICEVANJU na procesna in materialna pravila na področju državne pomoči, ki jih je 19. januarja 1994 sprejel Nadzorni organ [3],
Under Article 24 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the Authority shall give effect to the provisions of the EEA Agreement concerning state aid,
V skladu s členom 24 Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču Nadzorni organ uveljavlja določbe Sporazuma EGP v zvezi z državno pomočjo.
Under Article 5(2)(b) of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the Authority shall issue notices or guidelines on matters dealt with in the EEA Agreement if that Agreement or the Surveillance and Court Agreement expressly so provides or if the Authority considers it necessary,
Nadzorni organ v skladu s členom 5(2)(b) Sporazuma o nadzornem organu in sodišču izda obvestila ali smernice o zadevah, ki jih obravnava Sporazum EGP, če to izrecno določata navedeni sporazum ali Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču ali če Nadzorni organ meni, da je to potrebno.
On 22 May 2012, the European Commission adopted a Communication on Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme post-2012 [4].That Communication is also of relevance for the European Economic Area,
Evropska Komisija je 22. maja 2012 sprejela Sporočilo o Smernicah za nekatere ukrepe državne pomoči v okviru sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov po letu 2012 [4].Navedeno sporočilo je pomembno tudi za Evropski gospodarski prostor.
The State Aid Guidelines shall be amended by introducing a new chapter on state aid measures in the context of the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme post 2012.
Smernice o državni pomoči se spremenijo z uvedbo novega poglavja o ukrepih državne pomoči v okviru sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov po letu 2012.
The ‘EEA Agreement’.
„Sporazum EGP“.
The ‘Surveillance and Court Agreement’.
„Sporazum o nadzornem organu in sodišču“.
Guidelines on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, adopted and issued by the Authority on 19 January 1994, published in the Official Journal of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as OJ) L 231, 3.9.1994 p. 1 and EEA Supplement No 32, 3.9.1994 p. 1.
Smernice o uporabi in razlagi členov 61 in 62 Sporazuma EGP in člena 1 Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču, ki jih je sprejel in izdal Nadzorni organ 19. januarja 1994, objavljene v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: UL) L 231, 3.9.1994, str. 1, in Dopolnilu EGP št. 32, 3.9.1994, str. 1.
Communication from the Commission – Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme post-2012 (OJ C 158, 5.6.2012, p. 4).
Sporočilo Komisije – Smernice za nekatere ukrepe državne pomoči v okviru sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov po letu 2012 (UL C 158, 5.6.2012, str. 4).
AID IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION ALLOWANCE TRADING SCHEME POST 2012 [1]STATE AID POLICY AND THE ETS DIRECTIVE
POMOČ V OKVIRU SISTEMA ZA TRGOVANJE S PRAVICAMI DO EMISIJE TOPLOGREDNIH PLINOV PO LETU 2012 [1]POLITIKA DRŽAVNIH POMOČI IN DIREKTIVA O ETS
Directive 2009/29/EC is part of a legislative package containing measures to fight climate change and promote renewable and low-carbon energy.
Direktiva 2009/29/ES je del zakonodajnega svežnja, ki vsebuje ukrepe za boj proti podnebnim spremembam ter pospeševanje obnovljivih in nizkoogljičnih virov energije.
That package was mainly designed to achieve the Union’s overall environmental target of a 20 % reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared to 1990 and a 20 % share of renewable energy in the Union’s total energy consumption by 2020.
Namen svežnja je bil predvsem doseči splošni okoljski cilj Unije, tj. 20-odstotno znižanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v primerjavi z letom 1990 in 20-odstotni delež obnovljivih virov energije v skupni porabi energije v Uniji do leta 2020.
The ETS Directive provides for the following special and temporary measures for certain undertakings: aid to compensate for increases in electricity prices resulting from the inclusion of the costs of greenhouse gas emissions due to the EU ETS (commonly referred to as ‘indirect emission costs’), investment aid to highly efficient power plants, including new power plants that are ready for the environmentally safe capture and geological storage of CO2 (CCS-ready), optional transitional free allowances in the electricity sector in some EFTA States [5] and the exclusion of certain small installations from the EU ETS if the greenhouse gas emission reductions can be achieved outside the framework of the EU ETS at lower administrative cost.
Direktiva o ETS določa naslednje posebne in začasne ukrepe za nekatera podjetja: pomoč za nadomestitev povišanj cen električne energije, ki izvirajo iz vključitve stroškov emisij toplogrednih plinov zaradi EU ETS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: posredni stroški emisij), pomoč za naložbe visokoučinkovitim elektrarnam, vključno z novimi elektrarnami, ki so pripravljene na okoljsko varno zajemanje in geološko shranjevanje CO2 (elektrarne, pripravljene na CCS), možnost prehodno brezplačnih pravic v sektorju električne energije v nekaterih državah Efte [5] ter izvzetje nekaterih malih naprav iz EU ETS, če se lahko zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov doseže zunaj okvira EU ETS z nižjimi upravnimi stroški.
The special and temporary measures provided for in the context of implementation of the ETS Directive involve State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.
Posebni in začasni ukrepi, določeni v okviru izvajanja direktive o ETS, vključujejo državno pomoč v smislu člena 61(1) Sporazuma EGP.
In accordance with Section II of Part 2 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, State aid must be notified by EFTA States to the EFTA Surveillance Authority and may not be put into effect until it is approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.
V skladu z oddelkom II dela 2 Protokola 3 k Sporazumu o nadzornem organu in sodišču morajo države Efte državno pomoč priglasiti Nadzornemu organu Efte in je ne smejo izvajati, dokler je Nadzorni organ Efte ne odobri.
In order to ensure transparency and legal certainty, these Guidelines explain the compatibility criteria that will be applied to these State aid measures in the context of the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme, as improved and extended by Directive 2009/29/EC.
Za zagotovitev preglednosti in pravne varnosti te smernice pojasnjujejo merila združljivosti, ki se bodo uporabljala za navedene ukrepe državne pomoči v okviru sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov, kakor je bil izboljšan in razširjen z Direktivo 2009/29/ES.
In line with the balancing test formulated in the 2005 State Aid Action Plan [6], the primary objective of State aid control in the context of implementation of the EU ETS is to ensure that State aid measures will result in a higher reduction of greenhouse gas emissions than would occur without the aid and to ensure that the positive effects of the aid outweigh its negative effects in terms of distortions of competition in the internal market.
V skladu s testom tehtanja, opredeljenim v akcijskem načrtu državnih pomoči iz leta 2005 [6], je glavni cilj nadzora državnih pomoči v okviru izvajanja EU ETS zagotoviti, da bo rezultat ukrepov državne pomoči večje zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov, kot bi bilo doseženo brez pomoči, in da bodo pozitivni učinki pomoči večji od negativnih učinkov v smislu izkrivljanja konkurence na notranjem trgu.
State aid must be necessary to achieve the environmental objective of the EU ETS (necessity of the aid) and must be limited to the minimum needed to achieve the environmental protection sought (proportionality of the aid) without creating undue distortions of competition and trade in the internal market.
Državna pomoč mora biti potrebna za dosego okoljskega cilja EU ETS (potreba po pomoči) in mora biti omejena na najmanjšo potrebno, da se doseže želena stopnja varstva okolja (sorazmernost pomoči), ne da bi pri tem neupravičeno izkrivljala konkurenco in trgovino na notranjem trgu.
Since the provisions introduced by Directive 2009/29/EC will apply as from 1 January 2013, State aid cannot be deemed necessary to lessen any burden resulting from this Directive before that date.
Ker se bodo določbe, uvedene z Direktivo 2009/29/ES, uporabljale od 1. januarja 2013, se pred tem datumom državna pomoč ne more šteti za potrebno za zmanjševanje bremena, ki je posledica te direktive.
Consequently, the measures covered by these Guidelines may only be authorised for costs incurred on or after 1 January 2013, except for the aid involved in optional transitional free allocation for the modernisation of electricity generation (in some EFTA States), which may comprise, under certain conditions, investments undertaken as from 25 June 2009 included in the National Plan.
Zato se lahko ukrepi, zajeti v teh smernicah, odobrijo samo za stroške, ki bodo nastali 1. januarja 2013 ali pozneje, razen za pomoč, vsebovano v možnosti dodelitve prehodno brezplačnih pravic za posodobitev proizvodnje električne energije (v nekaterih državah Efte), ki lahko pod določenimi pogoji vključuje pomoč za naložbe, ki se izvajajo od 25. junija 2009 in so vključene v nacionalni načrt.
SPECIFIC MEASURES COVERED BY THESE GUIDELINES
POSEBNI UKREPI, ZAJETI V TEH SMERNICAH
Aid to undertakings in sectors and subsectors deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage due to EU ETS allowance costs passed on in electricity prices (aid for indirect emission costs)
Pomoč za podjetja v sektorjih in delih sektorjev, ki veljajo za izpostavljene visokemu tveganju premestitve emisij CO2 zaradi stroškov pravic EU ETS, ki so bili vključeni v ceno električne energije (pomoč za posredne stroške emisij)
Under Article 10a(6) of the ETS Directive, EEA States may grant State aid in favour of sectors or subsectors deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage due to costs relating to greenhouse gas emissions passed on in electricity prices (hereinafter referred to as indirect emission costs), in order to compensate for those costs in accordance with State aid rules.
V skladu s členom 10a(6) direktive o ETS lahko države EGP odobrijo državno pomoč v korist sektorjev ali delov sektorjev, ki veljajo za izpostavljene visokemu tveganju premestitve emisij CO2 zaradi stroškov, povezanih z emisijami toplogrednih plinov, vključenih v ceno električne energije, z namenom, da se ti stroški nadomestijo v skladu s pravili o državni pomoči.
For the purposes of these Guidelines, ‘carbon leakage’ describes the prospect of an increase in global greenhouse gas emissions when companies shift production outside the EEA because they cannot pass on the cost increases induced by the EU ETS to their customers without significant loss of market share.
V teh smernicah „premestitev emisij CO2“ opisuje predvidevanja v zvezi s povečanji globalnih emisij toplogrednih plinov, kadar podjetja preselijo proizvodnjo v države zunaj EGP, ker ne morejo prenesti večjih stroškov, ki izvirajo iz EU ETS, na svoje stranke brez znatne izgube tržnega deleža.
Addressing the risk of carbon leakage serves an environmental objective, since the aid aims to avoid an increase in global greenhouse gas emissions due to shifts of production outside the EEA, in the absence of a binding international agreement on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
Ob odsotnosti zavezujočega mednarodnega sporazuma za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov je omejitev tveganja za premestitev emisij CO2 okoljski cilj, saj je pomoč namenjena preprečevanju povečanja globalnih emisij toplogrednih plinov zaradi preselitve proizvodnje zunaj EGP.
At the same time, aid for indirect emission costs may have a negative impact on the efficiency of the EU ETS.
Hkrati pa lahko pomoč za posredne stroške emisij negativno vpliva na učinkovitost EU ETS.
If poorly targeted, the aid would relieve the beneficiaries of the cost of their indirect emissions, thereby limiting incentives for emission reductions and innovation in the sector.
Ciljno slabo usmerjena pomoč bi upravičence razbremenila njihovih posrednih stroškov emisij, kar bi zmanjšalo spodbude za zmanjšanje emisij in inovacije v sektorju.
As a result, the costs of reducing emissions would have to be borne mainly by other sectors of the economy.
Posledično bi morali stroške zmanjšanja emisij nositi predvsem drugi sektorji gospodarstva.