natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Observes that 10 agencies had in total 17 comments related to internal control issues, which represents progress in comparison with 2012, when 22 agencies had 34 comments regarding the same issues; notes that in four cases those issues related to the implementation of internal control standards which were not adopted at year-end or adopted but only partially implemented, or for which corrective actions were still ongoing; notes that comments regarding fixed assets management and grant management decreased in comparison to 2012;
ugotavlja, da je deset agencij prejelo skupaj 17 pripomb o notranjih kontrolah, kar je napredek v primerjavi z letom 2012, ko je 22 agencij prejelo 34 pripomb o istem vprašanju; ugotavlja, da so se v štirih primerih te pripombe nanašale na upoštevanje standardov notranjih kontrol, ki ob koncu leta še niso bili sprejeti ali pa so bili sprejeti, vendar le delno uresničeni, oziroma so se zanje še izvajali popravljalni ukrepi; ugotavlja, da se je število pripomb o upravljanju osnovnih sredstev in nepovratnih sredstev v primerjavi z letom 2012 zmanjšalo;
Takes note that the roles of the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) and of the agencies' Internal Audit Capabilities (IACs) have been further clarified by the FFR by setting the premises for enhanced coordination of work, exchange of information and overall synergies between them; notes that the FFR gives the agencies the possibility of sharing their IACs and calls on them to do so, where possible;
je seznanjen, da okvirna finančna uredba podrobneje pojasnjuje vlogo službe Komisije za notranjo revizijo in oddelkov agencij za notranjo revizijo, saj določa izhodišča za tesnejše usklajevanje dela, izmenjavo informacij in splošne sinergije med njimi; ugotavlja, da ta uredba agencijam omogoča, da imajo skupne oddelke za notranjo revizijo, in jih celo poziva, naj jih uvedejo, če je le mogoče;
Invites the Court of Auditors to further focus on auditing the sound financial management of the agencies, namely the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which the agencies have used their appropriations in carrying out their responsibilities;
na splošno poziva Računsko sodišče, naj se dodatno osredotoči na revizijo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja agencij, in sicer gospodarnosti, uspešnosti in učinkovitosti, s katerimi so agencije uporabljale sredstva za izvajanje svojih nalog.
Self-financed agencies
Agencije, ki se financirajo iz lastnih sredstev
Reiterates that the Union bodies to which the financial rules laid down in the FFR do not apply should establish, for the sake of consistency, similar rules, where appropriate.
znova opozarja, da bi morali organi Unije, za katere se finančna pravila iz okvirne finančne uredbe ne uporabljajo, zaradi skladnosti sprejeti podobna pravila, kjer je to primerno [8]; poudarja, da je treba vprašanje presežkov rešiti čim prej in razmisliti o možnosti, da se ta denar vrne v proračun Unije; prosi medinstitucionalno delovno skupino za uspešnost, naj obravnava to zadevo;
[8]; stresses that current surpluses must be dealt with as soon as possible, and the possibility of re-allocating the money to the Union budget should be explored, refers the issue to the Inter-institutional Working Group on Performance for consideration;
Druge pripombe
Other comments
pozdravlja prizadevanje agencij za stroškovno učinkovitost in ekološkost delovnega okolja; spodbuja jih, naj še naprej iščejo stroškovno učinkovite in ekološke rešitve pri delu in upravljanju stavb ter pogosteje uporabljajo digitalne možnosti, kot so videokonference, da bi zmanjšale potne in druge stroške;
Welcomes the efforts made by the agencies to address the issue of cost-effectiveness and environment-friendliness of work environment; encourages the agencies to further pursue cost-effective and environment-friendly solutions with regard to work and building management and to increase the utility of digital solutions such as videoconferences in order to reduce travel and other expenses;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje agencijam, ki so vključene v ta postopek podelitve razrešnice, Svetu, Komisiji in Računskemu sodišču ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the agencies subject to this discharge procedure, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
UL C 442, 10.12.2014.
OJ C 442, 10.12.2014.
UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str. 1.
OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.
UL L 357, 31.12.2002, str. 72.
OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.
Delegirana uredba (EU) št. 1271/2013.
COM(2013) 519.
Trenutno Urad Skupnosti za sorte rastlin (CPVO) v Angersu in Urad za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (UUNT) v Alicanteju.
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja ARTEMIS za proračunsko leto 2013
having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2013,
ob upoštevanju sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja ARTEMIS za proračunsko leto 2013,
having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju člena 94 Poslovnika in Priloge V k Poslovniku,
A. whereas the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (‘the Joint Undertaking’) was set up in December 2007 for a period of 10 years to define and implement a ‘Research Agenda’ for the development of key technologies for embedded computing systems across different application areas in order to strengthen Union competitiveness and sustainability and to allow for the emergence of new markets and societal applications;
A. ker je bilo Skupno podjetje ARTEMIS (v nadaljevanju: skupno podjetje) decembra 2007 ustanovljeno za obdobje 10 let z namenom opredeliti in izvesti raziskovalni program za razvoj ključnih tehnologij za vgrajene računalniške sisteme na različnih področjih uporabe, da bi izboljšali evropsko konkurenčnost in vzdržnost ter omogočili oblikovanje novih trgov in družbenih aplikacij,
B. whereas the Joint Undertaking started to work autonomously in October 2009;
B. ker je začelo skupno podjetje samostojno delovati oktobra 2009,
C. whereas financial contributions from ARTEMIS Member States should amount in total to 1,8 times the Union's financial contribution and the in-kind contribution of research and development organisations participating in projects over the duration of the Joint Undertaking shall be equal to or greater than the contribution of public authorities;
C. ker bi morali finančni prispevki držav članic ARTEMIS, skupaj znašati 1,8-krat toliko kot finančni prispevek Unije, prispevki v naravi organizacij za raziskave in razvoj, ki sodelujejo v projektih, pa bi morali biti v obdobju delovanja skupnega podjetja enaki ali večji kot prispevki javnih organov,
D. whereas the Joint Undertaking and the ENIAC Joint Undertaking were merged to create the Electronic Components and Systems for European leadership Joint Technology Initiative (ECSEL JTI) which has started its activity in June 2014 and will run for 10 years;
D. ker sta bili skupno podjetje in Skupno podjetje ENIAC združeni v skupno tehnološko pobudo Elektronske komponente in sistemi za evropski vodilni položaj (STP ECSEL), ki je začela delovati junija 2014 in se bo izvajala deset let,
Recalls that the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’) stated that the 2013 annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2013 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year-end, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Rules;
spominja, da po mnenju Računskega sodišča letni računovodski izkazi skupnega podjetja za leto 2013 v vseh pomembnih vidikih ustrezno prikazujejo njegovo finančno stanje na dan 31. decembra 2013 ter rezultate njegovega poslovanja in denarne tokove za leto, ki se je takrat končalo, v skladu z določbami njegovih finančnih pravil;
Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the practical arrangements for ex post audits concerning the administrative agreements signed with the national funding authorities (‘NFAs’) have been put in place; takes note that the practical arrangements include the introduction of a specific reporting form, reinforced by the assessment of the national assurance systems by the Joint Undertaking and visits to the NFAs by the Court;
je seznanjen z navedbami skupnega podjetja, da so bile vzpostavljene praktične ureditve za naknadne revizije v zvezi z upravnimi sporazumi, podpisanimi z nacionalnimi organi financiranja; ugotavlja, da je med praktičnimi ureditvami tudi uvedba posebnega obrazca za poročanje, ki se mu doda ocena nacionalnih sistemov za zagotavljanje kakovosti, ki jo pripravi skupno podjetje, Računsko sodišče pa izvaja obiske nacionalnih organov financiranja;
Recalls that the ex post strategy adopted by the Joint Undertaking states that it must assess at least once a year whether the information sent by the NFAs provide sufficient assurance as to the regularity and legality of the executed transactions;
spominja, da mora skupno podjetje v skladu s strategijo naknadnih revizij, ki jo je sprejelo, vsaj enkrat letno preveriti, ali informacije, ki so jih posredovali nacionalni organi financiranja, dajejo zadostno zagotovilo o pravilnosti in zakonitosti izvršenih transakcij;
Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the 23 NFAs that shared information on their audit strategies represent 95 % of the total grants awarded; welcomes the fact that in order to complement the information obtained by the Joint Undertaking, the Court acquires additional information directly from the NFAs in order to express an opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts;
je seznanjen z navedbami skupnega podjetja, da 23 nacionalnih organov financiranja, ki so predložili informacije o svojih revizijskih strategijah, predstavlja 95 % vseh dodeljenih subvencij; pozdravlja dejstvo, da Računsko sodišče informacije, ki jih je podalo skupno podjetje, dopolni z dodatnimi informacijami, ki jih pridobi neposredno od nacionalnih organov financiranja, in na tej osnovi pripravi mnenje o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, povezanih z izkazi;
Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that it made progress in implementing the action plan aimed at remedying the deficiencies identified by the Court in its qualified opinion; notes that the assurances provided by the national systems were positively assessed for countries representing 54 % of the total grants, while the assessments for further countries are in an advanced phase of execution which will bring the assessed grant coverage to 84 %; calls on the Joint Undertaking to continue the assessment in order to reach 100 % coverage of the total grants;
je seznanjen z navedbami skupnega podjetja, da napreduje pri izvajanju akcijskega načrta za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je Računsko sodišče opredelilo v svojem mnenju s pridržkom; ugotavlja, da so bila zagotovila, ki so bila na voljo v nacionalnih sistemih, pozitivno ocenjena za države, ki predstavljajo 54 % vseh subvencij, pri čemer so ocene za dodatne države v napredni fazi izvrševanja, kar bo povečalo obseg ocene subvencij na 84 %; poziva skupno podjetje, naj nadaljuje oceno, da bi doseglo 100-odstotno pokritost vseh subvencij;
Takes note that a workshop on assurance was organised, bringing together the representatives of the Court, the Commission and the Commission's Internal Audit Service, as well as representatives of NFAs active in the Joint Undertaking; notes that this workshop highlighted requirements of European programmes and enabled the exchange of information and best practices with the NFAs;
ugotavlja, da je bila organizirana delavnica o zagotovilih, kjer so se zbrali predstavniki Računskega sodišča, Komisije in službe Komisije za notranjo revizijo, kot tudi predstavniki nacionalnih organov financiranja, ki delujejo v skupnem podjetju; ugotavlja, da so bile na tej delavnici poudarjene zahteve iz evropskih programov ter omogočena izmenjava informacij in primerov najboljše prakse nacionalnih organov financiranja;
Notes that the Joint Undertaking developed a new methodology for residual error rate estimation, similar to the one used by the Commission services in charge of co-managed funding; acknowledges that the first evaluation of the residual error rate based on the 157 audited transactions was 0,73 %, while a recent update based on 331 transactions resulted in an error rate of 0,66 %, below the materiality threshold of 2 %;
ugotavlja, da je skupno podjetje razvilo novo metodologijo za ocenjevanje stopnje preostale napake, ki je podobna tisti, ki jo uporabljajo službe Komisije, pristojne za skupno upravljanje financiranja; ugotavlja, da je prva ocena stopnje preostale napake, ki je temeljila na 157 revidiranih transakcijah, znašala 0,73 %, pred kratkim posodobljena ocena, ki je temeljila na 331 transakcijah, pa je pokazala 0,66-odstotno stopnjo napake, ki je bila pod 2-odstotnim pragom pomembnosti;
Recalls that the utilisation rate of payment appropriations after the end of year budget amendment was 69 %; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the delay in issuing payment certificates by the NFAs is one of the main reasons for the low utilisation rate as the payments are executed without delay as soon as the national certificates are received; acknowledges moreover that the slower payment pace did not affect the technical execution of the projects;
spominja, da je stopnja uporabe odobritev plačil po spremembi proračuna ob koncu leta znašala 69 %; je seznanjen z navedbami skupnega podjetja, da je zamuda nacionalnih organov financiranja pri izdaji potrdil o plačilih eden glavnih razlogov za nizko stopnjo uporabe, saj se plačila izvršijo nemudoma po prejetju nacionalnih potrdil; poleg tega ugotavlja, da počasnejše izvrševanje plačil ni vplivalo na tehnično izvrševanje projektov;
Ascertains from the Joint Undertaking that the contributions committed by Member States were at the level of 1,8 times the Union commitments; acknowledges that the commitments by Member States had to be reduced below the 1,8 threshold when awarding the grants in order to comply with the limitations imposed by the State aid rules; takes note that the resulting contributions to the Joint Undertaking by the Union were EUR 181454844, whereas the Member States contributions were EUR 341842261, resulting in a level of 1,88;
na podlagi navedb skupnega podjetja ugotavlja, da so bili prispevki, za katere so države članice sprejele obveznosti, na ravni 1,8-krat toliko kot obveznosti Unije; ugotavlja, da je bilo treba pri dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev obveznosti držav članic spustiti pod zgornjo mejo 1,8, da bi se upoštevale omejitve v skladu s pravili o državni pomoči; je seznanjen, da so tako prilagojeni prispevki Unije skupnemu podjetju znašali 181454844 EUR, prispevki držav članic pa 341842261 EUR, kar pomeni stopnjo 1,88;
Takes note that the Commission will carry out an evaluation to assess the ARTEMIS activity up to the date of the ECSEL JTI creation, as provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 74/2008 setting up the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking, to be considered for the discharge for the financial year 2014;
ugotavlja, da bo Komisija izvedla vrednotenje, s katerim bo ocenila dejavnosti ARTEMIS vse od datuma ustanovitve skupne tehnološke pobude za elektronske komponente in sisteme za evropski vodilni položaj (ECSEL), kot določa Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 74/2008 o ustanovitvi Skupnega podjetja ARTEMIS, in ga bo upoštevala pri razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2014;
Takes note from the Joint Undertaking that further to the requirements of Article 6(2) of its establishing Regulation, the Internal Audit Capability (IAC) established in the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (ENIAC JU) is now established as the Joint Undertaking's IAC due to the merger of the two Joint Undertakings;
je seznanjen z navedbami skupnega podjetja, da je v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 6(2) uredbe o njegovi ustanovitvi oddelek za notranjo revizijo, ustanovljen v okviru Skupnega podjetja ENIAC, zaradi združitve obeh skupnih podjetij postal oddelek za notranjo revizijo skupnega podjetja;
Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that its Disaster Recovery Plan for the Joint Undertaking's common IT infrastructure is approved;
je seznanjen z navedbami skupnega podjetja, da je odobren načrt, ki ga je pripravilo za primer, če bi prišlo do nesreče in bi bilo treba njegovo skupno infrastrukturo IT ponovno zagnati;
Prevention and management of conflicts of interests and transparency
Preprečevanje in obvladovanje nasprotja interesov ter preglednost
Notes that due to the merger with the ENIAC JU, the Comprehensive policy for the prevention and management of conflicts of interests of the ENIAC JU is also applicable to the Joint Undertaking; notes, furthermore, that the procedures for managing situations of conflicts of interests, as well as the mechanism proceedings in the event of a violation of the rules, are part of the adopted policy;
ugotavlja, da zaradi združitve s Skupnim podjetjem ENIAC celovita politika za preprečevanje in obvladovanje nasprotja interesov Skupnega podjetja ENIAC velja tudi za skupno podjetje; ugotavlja tudi, da so postopki za obvladovanje primerov nasprotja interesov in postopki mehanizma v primeru kršitev pravil del sprejete politike;
Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that the CVs and the declarations of interests of its Executive Director and managers as required by the Staff Regulations and the implementing rules were collected and posted on the Joint Undertaking's web site; notes that a comprehensive database including all identified information related to conflicts of interests as well as the measures taken, has been established and is regularly maintained;
na podlagi informacij skupnega podjetja ugotavlja, da so bili življenjepisi in izjave o interesih izvršnega direktorja in upravljavcev v skladu z zahtevami iz kadrovskih predpisov in izvedbenimi pravili zbrani in objavljeni na spletišču skupnega podjetja; ugotavlja, da je bila vzpostavljena celovita podatkovna zbirka, ki vsebuje vse opredeljene informacije glede nasprotja interesov in sprejetih ukrepov in ki se redno posodablja;
Recalls that the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) Decision [1] establishes a monitoring and reporting system related to the protection, dissemination and transfer of research results; acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that 211,5 publications and 16,6 patents per EUR 10000000 of Union grants shows a high productivity of its research results and that it is compliant with all requests expressed so far by the FP7 coordinators.
spominja, da sklep o sedmem okvirnem programu [1] vzpostavlja sistem spremljanja in poročanja, ki zajema varstvo, razširjanje in prenos rezultatov raziskav; je seznanjen z navedbami skupnega podjetja, da 211,5 publikacij in 16,6 patentov za vsakih 10000000 EUR subvencij Unije kaže na veliko produktivnost raziskovalnih rezultatov podjetja ter da podjetje upošteva vse zahteve, ki so jih do sedaj izrazili koordinatorji sedmega okvirnega programa.
Article 7 of Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) (OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Člen 7 Sklepa št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o Sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str. 1).
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge for implementation of the budget for the European Institute of Innovation and Technology for the financial year 2013
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega inštituta za inovacije in tehnologijo za proračunsko leto 2013
having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju člena 94 Poslovnika in Priloge V k Poslovniku,
Recalls that the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’), in its report on the annual accounts of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (‘the Institute’) for the financial year 2013, found for the second consecutive year no reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of the grant transactions; notes that in the Court's view the quality of the certificates was compromised as they were issued by independent audit firms contracted by the grant beneficiaries, covering about 87 % of the grant expenditure; recalls furthermore that in order to address the shortcomings related to the quality of the audit certificates, the Institute improved the instructions provided to certifying auditors and communicated the updated instructions to the ‘Knowledge and Innovation Communities’ (KICs), the recipients of the Institute's grants, in June 2013;
opozarja, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu o letnih računovodskih izkazih Evropskega inštituta za inovacije in tehnologijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: inštitut) za proračunsko leto 2013 že drugo leto zapored ugotovilo, da ni nobenega razumnega zagotovila o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, povezanih z nepovratnimi sredstvi; ugotavlja, da je bila po mnenju Računskega sodišča kakovost potrdil nezanesljiva, saj so jih izdala neodvisna revizorska podjetja, ki so jih najeli upravičenci do nepovratnih sredstev, in zajemajo približno 87 % odhodkov za nepovratna sredstva; poleg tega opozarja, da je inštitut, da bi odpravil pomanjkljivosti v zvezi s kakovostjo revizijskih potrdil, izboljšal navodila revizorjem, ki izdajajo potrdila, ter junija 2013 posredoval posodobljena navodila skupnostim znanja in inovacij, ki so prejemnice nepovratnih sredstev inštituta;
Notes from the Institute that the improved instructions resulted in an improvement of the quality of the audit certificates received in respect to 2013 grant transactions for which the final payments were made in 2014;
je seznanjen s trditvijo inštituta, da se je zaradi boljših navodil izboljšala kakovost revizijskih potrdil, prejetih v zvezi s transakcijami nepovratnih sredstev iz leta 2013, za katera so bila končna plačila opravljena v letu 2014;
Acknowledges that, starting with the 2014 grant agreements, the Institute uses the same audit certificate methodology as all other programmes under the Horizon 2020 framework programme; notes that the use of a more detailed and consistent certification methodology has further increased the assurance obtained in the course of ex ante verifications;
priznava, da inštitut od sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev iz leta 2014 uporablja isto metodologijo za potrdila kot vsi drugi programi v okvirnem programu Obzorje 2020; ugotavlja, da je uporaba natančnejše in skladnejše metodologije certificiranja še povečala zagotovila, pridobljena v okviru predhodnih preverjanj;