natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, the exporting producer undertook to include the third production site in the undertaking offer; not to sell the product concerned via its related entities in the Union; to provide details of its sales in the Union of other products to its Union HRF customers; and not to sell outside of the Union the product concerned and other products to its Union HRF customers.
Za prodajo nad to zgornjo mejo je proizvajalec izvoznik ponudil uporabo veljavne protidampinške dajatve.
Finally, the exporting producer proposed a lower annual quantitative ceiling.
Poleg teh zavez je med posvetovanji ukrajinska vlada predlagala, da bo Komisiji predložila statistične podatke o izvozu za zadevni izdelek in ustanovila skupino strokovnjakov, ki bi olajšali izmenjavo statističnih in drugih podatkov.
Beyond that ceiling, the exporting producer offered to sell under the applicable anti-dumping duty.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je 5. februarja 2018 ponovno spremenil svojo ponudbo zaveze.
In addition to these commitments, during the consultations the Government of Ukraine proposed to provide the Commission with export statistics for the product concerned and to establish an expert group that would facilitate the exchange of statistics and other information.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je njegova celotna prodaja predmet stroge cenovne politike skupine, kar preprečuje navzkrižno kompenzacijo.
On 5 February 2018, the exporting producer made another amendment to its undertaking offer.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da redne revizije davčnih organov, tako v Uniji kot v Švici, strogo preverjajo cenovne politike skupine.
The exporting producer argued that all of its sales are subject to strict price-making policy of the group and prevent cross-compensation.
Kljub temu se je proizvajalec izvoznik zavezal, da ne bo prodajal vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov, proizvedenih v Uniji, in drugih izdelkov, ki jih proizvaja njegova skupina, svojim odjemalcem vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov, ki kupujejo zadevni izdelek.
Furthermore, the exporting producer argued that the regular tax authorities' audits, both in the Union and in Switzerland, rigorously verify the pricing policies of the group.
To bi veljalo za vse njegove stranke razen ene, ki bi kupovala vroče valjane ploščate izdelke iz Ukrajine in Unije ter druge izdelke, ki jih proizvaja skupina.
Despite these, the exporting producer undertook not to sell HRF produced in the Union and other products produced by its group to its HRF customers which buy the product concerned.
Glede pripombe, da je bila Komisija v fazi preiskave mnenja, da je sprejemljiva ena minimalna uvozna cena za vse vrste izdelkov, je Komisija opozorila, da je bila ta rešitev nazadnje zavrnjena.
This would apply to all of its customers except for one, who would be buying HRF from Ukraine, the Union and other products produced by the group.
Razlogi za to zavrnitev so navedeni med drugim v uvodnih izjavah 632 in 655 dokončne uredbe, kar je povzeto v uvodni izjavi 33 zgoraj.
Concerning the comment that the Commission considered a single MIP for all product types acceptable at a stage of the investigation, the Commission noted that ultimately that solution was rejected.
Ponudba je še vedno neustrezna iz več razlogov.
The reasons for this rejection were given in, among others, recitals 632 and 655 of the definitive Regulation, which are summarised in recital 33 above.
Od štirih predlaganih skupin minimalnih uvoznih cen v eni izmed njih skorajda ni bilo prodaje, v drugi obstaja cenovna različica, v preostalih dveh skupinah pa znatne cenovne različice.
The offer remains inadequate for several reasons.
Minimalne uvozne cene, ki temeljijo na povprečnih cenah v vsaki skupini, zato ne bodo odpravile škodljivih učinkov dampinga za vse vrste izdelkov, zlasti najdražje v vsaki skupini.
Out of the four MIP groups proposed there were barely any sales in one of them, there is a price variant in another and significant price variants in the remaining two groups.
Poleg tega so bile ravni štirih minimalnih uvoznih cen določene povsem naključno.
The MIPs, being based on the average prices in each group will therefore not remove the injurious effects of dumping for all product types, in particular the most expensive ones in each group.
Komisiji niso bili predloženi nobeni podatki, ki bi upravičili razliko med minimalnimi uvoznimi cenami.
Furthermore, the levels of four MIPs were set in a completely arbitrary fashion.
Medtem ko cene vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov ponavadi v daljšem časovnem obdobju znatno nihajo, proizvajalec izvoznik še vedno ni predlagal mehanizma prilagoditve cen.
The Commission was presented with no data justifying the difference between the MIPs.
Poleg tega sprejetje ponudbe zaveze še vedno ni smiselno.
Finally, whilst HRF prices tend to vary significantly over time, the exporting producer still did not propose an adjustment mechanism.
Proizvajalec izvoznik se je zavezal, da ne bo prodajal izdelkov subjektom svojih strank v Uniji, ki imajo sedež zunaj Unije.
The acceptance of the undertaking offer remains impractical.
Vendar pa ta zaveza vključuje samo tri proizvodna podjetja, ne upošteva pa na desetine njegovih povezanih družb, vključno s švicarskim trgovcem.
The exporting producer undertook not to sell any products to its Union customers' entities based outside of the Union.
Tudi če bi bile vse te družbe vključene v zavezo, pa glede na velikost skupine proizvajalca izvoznika in njegove baze strank takšne zaveze ne bi bilo mogoče spremljati.
However, this undertaking covers only the three producing companies and omits dozens of its related companies including the Swiss trader.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik predlagal, da bi poročal o prodaji drugih izdelkov svojim odjemalcem vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov v Uniji.
Even if all these companies were covered by the undertaking, considering the size of the exporting producer's group and that of their customer base, such commitment would be impossible to monitor.
Vendar Komisija ne bi imela ustreznih referenčnih meril, da bi lahko preverila, ali gre pri teh transakcijah za kompenzacijo.
Furthermore, the exporting producer proposed to report on sales of other products to its HRF customers in the Union.
Medtem ko se je proizvajalec izvoznik zavezal, da ne bo prodajal prek svojih povezanih subjektov v Uniji, ti subjekti prodajajo podoben izdelek na trgu Unije.
However the Commission would not have the appropriate benchmarks in order to verify whether these transactions are of a compensatory nature.
Čeprav te transakcije lahko zadevajo iste stranke in se zato lahko uporabljajo za kompenzacijo, so povsem zunaj okvira zaveze.
Whilst the exporting producer undertook not to sell via its related entities in the Union, these entities sell the like product on the Union market.
Sprememba ponudbe zaveze, predlagana 5. februarja 2018 (tj. da bo proizvajalec izvoznik prodajal samo zadevni izdelek vsem svojim odjemalcem vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov v Uniji razen enemu), ne odpravlja zgoraj omenjenega pomisleka glede izvzete stranke.
Whilst these transactions may concern the same customers and thus can be used for compensation, they are completely outside of the scope of the undertaking.
Kar se tiče drugih strank, bi bilo glede na velikost skupine proizvajalca izvoznika nemogoče spremljati, ali katera od družb, povezanih s proizvajalcem izvoznikom, prodaja druge izdelke odjemalcem vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov v Uniji ali njihovim povezanim subjektom.
The amendment to the undertaking offer proposed on 5 February 2018 (i.e. to sell only the product concerned to all of its HRF customers in the Union, except for one), does not remove the abovementioned concern for the excluded customer.
Notranji cenovni politiki proizvajalca izvoznika in stranke, kateri namerava prodajati, nista zadostna zaščita pred navzkrižnimi kompenzacijami.
For the other customers, considering the size of the exporting producer's group, it would be impossible to monitor whether any of the companies related to the exporting producer sell other products to the Union HRF customers or their related entities.
Poleg tega proizvajalec izvoznik ni pojasnil, kako bi revizije davčnih organov v Uniji in v Švici odkrile cene, ki pomenijo navzkrižne kompenzacije.
The internal pricing policies of the exporting producer and the customer it intends to sell to are not a sufficient guaranty against cross-compensation.
Prodaje nad zgornjo mejo na letni ravni z uporabo veljavne protidampinške dajatve ni mogoče sprejeti, saj bi se lahko uporabila za kompenzacijo.
It is part of day-to-day price negotiations.
Kljub temu, da pridružitveni sporazum med EU in Ukrajino v členu 50 daje prednost zavezam, ponudbe ni mogoče sprejeti, saj je neustrezna.
Finally, the sales beyond the annual ceiling under the applicable anti-dumping duty cannot be accepted as they could be used for compensation.
Če bi bila ustrezna, iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov njeno sprejetje še vedno ne bi bilo smiselno.
This is basically a variation of the pick-and-choose clauses described in recital 31 above, postponed in time.
Nobeden od zgoraj navedenih pomislekov ne bi bil zadosti obravnavan z izmenjavo statističnih podatkov in oblikovanjem skupine strokovnjakov, kar je med posvetovanjem predlagala ukrajinska vlada.
Therefore, by lowering the ceiling well below the historical annual export quantities, this new offer increases the risk of cross-compensation.
Sklepna ugotovitev
Despite the preference for undertakings expressed in Article 50 of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, the offer cannot be accepted as it is inadequate.
Iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov Komisija ne more sprejeti nobene od teh ponujenih zavez.
Had it been adequate, for the reasons outlined above, its acceptance would still be impractical.
Pripombe strani in zavrnitev ponujenih zavez
None of the concerns listed above would have been sufficiently addressed by the exchange of statistics and the creation of the expert group proposed by the Government of Ukraine during the consultation.
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o razlogih za to odločitev in so imele možnost, da podajo pripombe in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Conclusion
Vladi Ukrajine je bilo tudi ponujeno posvetovanje v skladu s členom 50a pridružitvenega sporazuma med EU in Ukrajino.
For the reasons set out above the Commission cannot accept any of these undertaking offers.
Posvetovanja z ukrajinskimi organi so bila izvedena 26. januarja 2018, ukrajinska vlada pa je predložila pisne pripombe 31. januarja 2018.
Comments of parties and rejection of the undertaking offers
Niti predložene pripombe zainteresiranih strani niti posvetovanja z ukrajinsko vlado niso privedli do drugačnega sklepa od zavrnitve ponujenih zavez –
The interested parties have been informed of the reasons underlying this decision and were given an opportunity to comment and to be heard.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The Government of Ukraine was also offered consultation in accordance with Article 50 bis of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement.
Člen 1
In addition, a number of hearings with the exporting producers concerned and Eurofer, representing the Union industry, took place.
Člen 2
All comments received throughout this process were addressed above.
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Neither the comments provided by interested parties, nor the consultations with the Government of Ukraine, led to a different conclusion than the rejection of the undertaking offers,
V Bruslju, 8. marca 2018
The undertakings offered by the exporting producers in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia and Ukraine, are hereby rejected.
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
Article 2
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1795 z dne 5. oktobra 2017 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz železa, nelegiranega jekla ali drugega legiranega jekla s poreklom iz Brazilije, Irana, Rusije in Ukrajine ter o zaključku preiskave o uvozu nekaterih vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz železa, nelegiranega jekla ali drugega legiranega jekla s poreklom iz Srbije (UL L 258, 6.10.2017, str. 24).
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
UL L 161, 29.5.2014, str. 3.
Done at Brussels, 8 March 2018.
Posvetovanja so potekala 26. januarja 2018.
For the Commission
Pisne pripombe so bile predložene 31. januarja 2018.
The President
Poleg tega so bila izvedena številna zaslišanja z zadevnimi proizvajalci izvozniki in združenjem Eurofer, ki predstavlja industrijo Unije.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
Vse pripombe, prejete v tem procesu, so bile obravnavane zgoraj.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1795 of 5 October 2017 imposing a definitive antidumping duty on imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia and Ukraine and terminating the investigation on imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Serbia (OJ L 258, 6.10.2017, p. 24).
Dogovor o prodaji izdelka po nižji ceni od siceršnje ne krši nujno davčne zakonodaje, saj je del tekočih pogajanj o cenah.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/354
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2018/354
authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Ireland
o odobritvi metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov na Irskem
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007, and in particular Article 20(p) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov kmetijskih proizvodov in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 922/72, (EGS) št. 234/79, (ES) št. 1037/2001 in (ES) št. 1234/2007 ter zlasti člena 20(p) Uredbe,
Point 1 of Section B.IV of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 provides that, for the classification of pig carcases, the lean-meat content has to be assessed by means of grading methods authorised by the Commission and only statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcase may be authorised.
Točka 1 oddelka B.IV Priloge IV k Uredbi (EU) št. 1308/2013 določa, da se za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov delež pustega mesa oceni z metodami za ocenjevanje, ki jih odobri Komisija, odobrijo pa se lahko le statistično potrjene metode za oceno, ki temeljijo na fizikalnih meritvah enega ali več anatomskih delov trupa prašiča.
The authorisation of grading methods should be subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment.
Za odobritev metod razvrščanja mora biti statistična napaka pri oceni znotraj najvišjega dovoljenega odstopanja.
That tolerance is defined in Article 23(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008.
Navedeno dovoljeno odstopanje je opredeljeno v členu 23(3) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1249/2008.
By Commission Decision 87/293/EC, the use of two methods for grading pig carcases in Ireland was authorised.
Z Odločbo Komisije 1987/293/ES je bila odobrena uporaba dveh metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov na Irskem.
Ireland has requested the Commission to remove the method ‘Fat-O-Meat'er (FOM)’ from the list of authorised methods for grading pig carcases in Ireland, as it is no longer used, to authorise three new methods for grading pig carcases on its territory and to update the existing equation for the instrument ‘Hennessy Grading Probe 2 (HGP2)’.
Irska je Komisijo zaprosila, da odstrani metodo „Fat-O-Meat'er (FOM)“ s seznama odobrenih metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov na Irskem, ker se več ne uporablja, ter odobri tri nove metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov na njenem ozemlju in posodobi veljavno enačbo za instrument „Hennessy Grading Probe 2 (HGP2)“.
Ireland has presented a detailed description of the dissection trial, indicating the principles on which those new methods are based, the results of its dissection trial and the equations used for assessing the percentage of lean meat in the protocol provided for in Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008.
Irska je zato v protokolu, kot je določen v členu 23(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1249/2008, predložila podroben opis preskusa z razkosanjem in navedla načela, na katerih temeljijo navedene nove metode, rezultate preskusa z razkosanjem in enačbe za ocenjevanje deleža pustega mesa.
Examination of that request has revealed that the conditions for authorising the new grading methods and updating the equation are fulfilled.
Pri preučitvi navedene prošnje je bilo ugotovljeno, da so pogoji za odobritev novih metod razvrščanja in posodobitev enačbe izpolnjeni.
Those grading methods should therefore be authorised in Ireland.
Zato bi bilo treba navedene metode razvrščanja na Irskem odobriti.
Decision 87/293/EC should therefore be repealed.
Odločbo 1987/293/ES bi bilo zato treba razveljaviti.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za skupno ureditev kmetijskih trgov –
The use of the following methods is authorised for grading pig carcases pursuant to Point 1 of Section B.IV of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 in Ireland:
Za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov na Irskem se v skladu s točko 1 oddelka B.IV Priloge IV k Uredbi (EU) št. 1308/2013 odobri uporaba naslednjih metod:
the ‘Hennessy Grading Probe 2 (HGP 2)’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part I of the Annex;
naprava „Hennessy Grading Probe 2 (HGP 2)“ in z njo povezane metode razvrščanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu I Priloge;
the ‘Hennessy Grading Probe 7 (HGP 7)’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part II of the Annex;
naprava „Hennessy Grading Probe 7 (HGP 7)“ in z njo povezane metode razvrščanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu II Priloge;
the ‘Fat-O-Meat'er II (FOM II)’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part III of the Annex;
naprava „Fat-O-Meat'er II (FOM II)“ in z njo povezane metode razvrščanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu III Priloge;
the ‘AutoFom III’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part IV of the Annex.
naprava „AutoFom III“ in z njo povezane metode razvrščanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu IV Priloge.
Modifications of the authorised apparatuses or grading methods shall not be allowed, unless those modifications are explicitly authorised by Commission Implementing Decision.
Spremembe odobrenih naprav ali metod razvrščanja niso dovoljene, če take spremembe niso izrecno odobrene z izvedbenim sklepom Komisije.
Decision 87/293/EC is repealed.
Odločba 1987/293/ES se razveljavi.
Done at Brussels, 8 March 2018.
V Bruslju, 8. marca 2018
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008 of 10 December 2008 laying down detailed rules on the implementation of the Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcases and the reporting of prices thereof (OJ L 337, 16.12.2008, p. 3).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1249/2008 z dne 10. decembra 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo lestvic Skupnosti za razvrščanje trupov goved, prašičev in ovac ter sporočanje njihovih cen (UL L 337, 16.12.2008, str. 3).
Commission Decision 87/293/EC of 18 May 1987 authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Ireland (OJ L 146, 6.6.1987, p. 66).
Odločba Komisije 1987/293/ES z dne 18. maja 1987 o odobritvi metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov na Irskem (UL L 146, 6.6.1987, str. 66).
METHODS FOR GRADING PIG CARCASES IN IRELAND
METODE ZA RAZVRŠČANJE PRAŠIČJIH TRUPOV NA IRSKEM
The rules provided for in this part shall apply when the grading of pig carcases is carried out by means of the apparatus known as ‘Hennessy Grading Probe 2 (HGP 2)’.
Pravila, določena v tem delu, se uporabljajo, kadar se razvrščanje prašičjih trupov opravi s pomočjo naprave, imenovane „Hennessy grading probe 2 (HGP 2)“.
The apparatus shall be equipped with a probe of 5,95 millimetres diameter (and of 6,3 millimetres at the blade on top of the probe) containing a photodiode (Siemens LED of the type LYU 260-EO and photodetector of the type 58 MR) and having an operating distance of between 0 and 120 millimetres.
Naprava je opremljena s sondo premera 5,95 milimetra (in 6,3 milimetra na jezičku na vrhu sonde), ki vsebuje fotodiodo (Siemens LED tipa LYU 260-EO in fotodetektor tipa 58 MR) ter ima obratovalno razdaljo med 0 in 120 milimetri.
The lean meat content of a carcase shall be calculated according to the following formula:
Vsebnost pustega mesa trupa se izračuna po naslednji enačbi:
LMP HGP 2 = the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcase;
LMP HGP 2 = ocenjeni delež pustega mesa v trupu,
F HGP 2 = the thickness of backfat (including rind) in millimetres, measured 6 centimetres off the midline of the split carcase between the third and fourth last rib;
F HGP 2 = debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih, merjena 6 cm od vzdolžne osi razpolovljenega trupa med tretjim in četrtim zadnjim rebrom,
M HGP 2 = the thickness of muscle in millimetres, measured at the same time and in the same place as FHGP 2.
M HGP 2 = debelina mišice v milimetrih, merjena istočasno in na istem mestu kot FHGP 2.
This formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 60 and 125 kilograms (warm weight).
Ta enačba velja za trupe, ki tehtajo med 60 in 125 kilogrami (topla masa).
The rules provided for in this part shall apply when the grading of pig carcases is carried out by means of the apparatus known as ‘Hennessy Grading Probe 7 (HGP 7)’.
Pravila, določena v tem delu, se uporabljajo, kadar se razvrščanje prašičjih trupov opravi s pomočjo naprave, imenovane „Hennessy grading probe 7 (HGP 7)“.
LMP HGP 7 = the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcase;
LMP HGP 7 = ocenjeni delež pustega mesa v trupu,
F HGP 7 = the thickness of backfat (including rind) in millimetres, measured 6 centimetres off the midline of the split carcase between the third and fourth last rib;
F HGP 7 = debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih, merjena 6 cm od vzdolžne osi razpolovljenega trupa med tretjim in četrtim zadnjim rebrom,
M HGP 7 = the thickness of muscle in millimetres, measured at the same time and in the same place as FHGP 7.
M HGP 7 = debelina mišice v milimetrih, merjena istočasno in na istem mestu kot FHGP 7.
The rules provided for in this part shall apply when the grading of pig carcases is carried out by means of the apparatus known as ‘Fat-O-Meat'er II (FOM II)’.
Pravila, določena v tem delu, se uporabljajo, kadar se razvrščanje prašičjih trupov opravi s pomočjo naprave, imenovane „Fat-O-Meat'er II (FOM II)“.
The FOM II consists of an optical probe with a knife, a depth measurement device having an operating distance of between 0 and 125 millimetres and a data acquisition and analysis board.
Napravo FOM II sestavljajo optična sonda z nožem, naprava za merjenje globine z obratovalno razdaljo med 0 in 125 mm ter sistem za pridobivanje in analiziranje podatkov.
LMP FOMII = the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcase;
LMP FOMII = ocenjeni delež pustega mesa v trupu,
F FOMII = the thickness of backfat (including rind) in millimetres, measured 6 centimetres off the midline of the split carcase between the third and fourth last rib;
F FOMII = debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih, merjena 6 cm od vzdolžne osi razpolovljenega trupa med tretjim in četrtim zadnjim rebrom,
M FOMII = the thickness of muscle in millimetres, measured at the same time and in the same place as FFOMII.
M FOMII = debelina mišice v milimetrih, merjena istočasno in na istem mestu kot FFOMII.