natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A pleading comprising a number of pages which exceeds by 40 % or more the maximum number of pages prescribed in points 105 and 107 above, as the case may be, shall require regularisation, unless otherwise directed by the President.
Po uvodu mora tožba vsebovati kratek povzetek dejanskega stanja spora.
A pleading comprising a number of pages which exceeds by less than 40 % the maximum number of pages prescribed in points 105 and 107 above, as the case may be, may require regularisation if so directed by the President.
Tožbene predloge je treba natančno opredeliti na začetku ali koncu tožbe.
Where a party is requested to put his pleading in order on account of its excessive length, service of the pleading which requires regularisation on account of its length shall be delayed.
Pravna utemeljitev naj bi bila oblikovana glede na navajane tožbene razloge.
B. Structure and content of written pleadings
Priporočljivo je tudi, da se pred njo shematično povzamejo navajani tožbeni razlogi.
Application initiating proceedings
Poleg tega je zaželeno, da se vsakemu navajanemu tožbenemu razlogu doda naslov za boljšo prepoznavnost.
The mandatory information to be included in the application initiating proceedings is prescribed by Article 76 of the Rules of Procedure.
Skupaj s tožbo je treba predložiti dokumente iz členov 51(2) in (3) ter 78 Poslovnika.
The introductory part of the application should be followed by a brief account of the facts giving rise to the dispute.
Za predložitev potrdila iz člena 51(2) Poslovnika, da je odvetnik, ki zastopa stranko ali pomaga njenemu agentu, upravičen do zastopanja pred sodišči države članice ali druge države podpisnice Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, se je mogoče sklicevati na potrdilo, ki je že bilo vloženo v okviru zadeve pri Splošnem sodišču.
The precise wording of the form of order sought by the applicant must be stated either at the beginning or at the end of the application.
Vsaki tožbi je treba priložiti povzetek navedenih tožbenih razlogov in bistvenih trditev, ki bo olajšal pripravo obvestila, ki se mora objaviti v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v skladu s členom 79 Poslovnika.
Legal arguments should be set out and grouped by reference to the particular pleas in law to which they relate.
Da bi Splošno sodišče lažje obravnavalo tožbo, se za povzetek navedenih tožbenih razlogov in bistvenih trditev zahteva:
Each argument or group of arguments should generally be preceded by a summary statement of the relevant plea.
da se predloži ločeno od tožbe in prilog, ki so v njej navedene;
In addition, the pleas in law put forward should ideally each be given a heading to enable them to be identified easily.
da ni daljši od dveh strani;
The documents referred to in Article 51(2) and (3) and Article 78 of the Rules of Procedure must be produced together with the application.
da se pripravi v jeziku postopka po vzorcu, ki je objavljen na spletnem mestu Sodišča Evropske unije;
For the purposes of the production of the document required by Article 51(2) of the Rules of Procedure certifying that the lawyer representing a party or assisting the party's agent is authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, reference may be made to a document previously lodged in a case before the Court.
da se po elektronski pošti v obliki navadne elektronske datoteke, pripravljene z uporabo programske opreme za oblikovanje besedila, pošlje na naslov GC.Registry@curia.europa.eu z navedbo zadeve, na katero se nanaša.
Each application must be accompanied by a summary of the pleas in law and main arguments relied on, designed to facilitate the drafting of the notice required to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Article 79 of the Rules of Procedure.
Če je tožba vložena po vložitvi prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč, zaradi katere se v skladu s členom 147(7) Poslovnika prekine rok za vložitev tožbe, je treba ta podatek navesti na začetku tožbe.
In order to assist the Court in processing the summary of pleas in law and main arguments relied on, it is requested that the summary:
Če je tožba vložena po vročitvi sklepa, s katerim je odločeno o prošnji za brezplačno pravno pomoč, ali če v tem sklepu odvetnik za zastopanje prosilca za brezplačno pravno pomoč ni določen, po vročitvi sklepa o določitvi odvetnika, ki ga bo zastopal, je treba v tožbi navesti dan, ko je bil sklep vročen tožeči stranki.
be produced separately from the body of the application and the annexes mentioned in the application;
Za lažjo oblikovno pripravo tožbe se zastopnikom strank priporoča ogled dokumenta ‚Pregledni seznam – Tožba‘, ki je na voljo na spletnem mestu Sodišča Evropske unije.
not exceed two pages;
Odgovor na tožbo
be prepared in the language of the case in accordance with the model available online on the internet site of the Court of Justice of the European Union;
Obvezni podatki, ki jih mora vsebovati odgovor na tožbo, so navedeni v členu 81(1) Poslovnika.
be transmitted by email, as an ordinary electronic file produced using word-processing software, to GC.Registry@curia.europa.eu, indicating the case to which it relates.
Predloge tožene stranke je treba natančno opredeliti na začetku ali koncu odgovora na tožbo.
If the application is lodged after the submission of an application for legal aid, the effect of which, under Article 147(7) of the Rules of Procedure, is to suspend the time limit prescribed for the bringing of an action, this must be stated at the beginning of the application initiating proceedings.
Vsako oporekanje dejstvom, ki jih zatrjuje tožeča stranka, mora biti izrecno, pri tem pa je treba zadevna dejstva natančno opredeliti.
If the application is lodged after service of the order making a decision on an application for legal aid or, where no lawyer is designated in that order to represent the applicant for legal aid, after service of the order designating the lawyer instructed to represent the applicant for legal aid, reference must also be made in the application to the date on which the order was served on the applicant.
Ker je pravni okvir postopka določen s tožbo, je treba utemeljitev v odgovoru na tožbo, kolikor je mogoče, oblikovati glede na razloge ali očitke, navedene v tožbi.
In order to facilitate formal preparation of the application, the parties' representatives are invited to consult the document entitled “Aide-mémoire: Application”, which is available on the internet site of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Točki 116 in 117 zgoraj se uporabljata za odgovor na tožbo.
Defence
Zaželeno je, da institucije pri zadevah, vloženih na podlagi člena 270 PDEU, odgovoru na tožbo priložijo navedene splošne akte, ki niso bili objavljeni v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, z navedbo datuma njihovega sprejetja, začetka njihove veljavnosti in glede na okoliščine primera datuma njihove razveljavitve.
The mandatory information to be included in the defence is prescribed by Article 81(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
Replika in duplika
The precise wording of the form of order sought by the defendant must be stated either at the beginning or at the end of the defence.
Če se izvede druga izmenjava vlog, lahko glavne stranke svojo utemeljitev dopolnijo, glede na okoliščine, z repliko ali dupliko.
Any fact alleged by the applicant which is contested must be specified and the basis on which it is contested expressly stated.
Ker so bili okvir in razlogi ali očitki, ki so jedro spora, že temeljito predstavljeni (ali izpodbijani) v tožbi in odgovoru na tožbo, je namen replike in duplike tožeči in toženi stranki omogočiti, da natančneje pojasnita svoje stališče ali podrobneje predstavita svojo utemeljitev v zvezi s pomembnim vprašanjem in odgovorita na nove okoliščine, navedene v odgovoru na tožbo in repliki.
Since the legal framework of the proceedings is fixed by the application, the legal arguments developed in the defence must, so far as is possible, be set out and grouped by reference to the pleas in law or complaints put forward in the application.
Predsednik lahko na podlagi člena 83(3) Poslovnika tudi opredeli vprašanja, na katera naj bi se ta procesna akta nanašala.
Points 116 and 117 above shall apply to the defence.
Obvezni podatki, ki jih mora vsebovati tožba, so navedeni v členu 177(1) Poslovnika.
In cases brought pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the institutions should preferably annex to the defence any acts of general application cited which have not been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, together with details of the dates of their adoption, their entry into force and, where applicable, their repeal.
Tožba mora vsebovati tudi podatke iz člena 177(2) in (3) Poslovnika.
Reply and rejoinder
Skupaj s tožbo je treba predložiti dokumente iz člena 177, od (3) do (5), Poslovnika.
Where there is a second exchange of pleadings, the main parties may supplement their legal arguments with a reply or a rejoinder, as the case may be.
Točke od 113 do 115, 117 in od 120 do 122 zgoraj se uporabljajo za tožbe v zadevah s področja intelektualne lastnine.
The framework and the pleas in law or complaints at the heart of the dispute having been set out (or disputed) in depth in the application and the defence, the purpose of the reply and the rejoinder shall be to allow the applicant and the defendant to make clear their position or to refine their arguments on an important issue, and to respond to new matters raised in the defence and in the reply.
Odgovor na tožbo
The President may also, pursuant to Article 83(3) of the Rules of Procedure, himself specify the matters to which those procedural documents should relate.
Obvezni podatki, ki jih mora vsebovati odgovor na tožbo, so navedeni v členu 180(1) Poslovnika.
The mandatory information to be included in the application initiating proceedings is prescribed by Article 177(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
Predloge tožene stranke ali intervenienta je treba natančno opredeliti na začetku ali koncu odgovora na tožbo.
The application must also contain the information referred to in Article 177(2) and (3) of the Rules of Procedure.
Skupaj z odgovorom na tožbo, ki ga vloži intervenient, je treba predložiti dokumente iz člena 177(4) in (5) Poslovnika, če niso bili že prej vloženi v skladu s členom 173(5) Poslovnika.
The documents referred to Article 177(3) to (5) of the Rules of Procedure must be produced together with the application.
Točke 117, 125 in 126 zgoraj se uporabljajo za odgovor na tožbo.
Points 113 to 115, 117 and 120 to 122 above shall apply to applications in intellectual property cases.
Nasprotna tožba in odgovori na nasprotno tožbo
Response
Če želi stranka v postopku pred odborom za pritožbe, ki ni tožeča stranka in ki ji je vročena tožba, izpodbijati izpodbijano odločbo glede vidika, ki ni bil omenjen v tožbi, mora ob vložitvi odgovora na tožbo vložiti nasprotno tožbo.
The mandatory information to be included in the response is prescribed by Article 180(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
Nasprotno tožbo je treba vložiti z ločeno vlogo in mora izpolnjevati zahteve iz členov 183 in 184 Poslovnika.
The precise wording of the form of order sought by the defendant or by the intervener must be stated either at the beginning or at the end of the response.
Če je vložena taka nasprotna tožba, lahko druge stranke v postopku vložijo odgovor na nasprotno tožbo, ki je omejen na predloge, razloge in trditve, navedene v nasprotni tožbi.
The documents referred to Article 177(4) and (5) of the Rules of Procedure must be produced together with the response lodged by the intervener, in so far as those documents have not already been lodged in accordance with Article 173(5) of the Rules of Procedure.
Kot izhaja iz člena 106 Poslovnika, Splošno sodišče opravi obravnavo po uradni dolžnosti ali na predlog glavne stranke.
Points 117, 125 and 126 above shall apply to the response.
Glavna stranka, ki želi ustno podati navedbe na obravnavi, mora v treh tednih od vročitve obvestila o koncu pisnega dela postopka strankam podati obrazložen predlog v tem smislu.
If, when the application has been served on him, a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal other than the applicant intends to challenge the contested decision on a point not raised in the application, that party must introduce a cross-claim when lodging his response.
Za boljše usmerjanje razprav med obravnavo, se priporoča, da obrazložitev ni splošna, ki bi se na primer sklicevala le na pomembnost zadeve.
That cross-claim must be introduced by a separate document and meet the requirements set out in Articles 183 and 184 of the Rules of Procedure.
Če glavna stranka obrazloženega predloga ne poda v določenem roku, lahko Splošno sodišče odloči, da bo o tožbi odločilo brez ustnega dela postopka.
Where such a cross-claim is made, the other parties to the proceedings may submit a pleading in response confined to the form of order sought, the pleas in law and the arguments relied on in the cross-claim.
B. Priprava obravnave
V. THE ORAL PART OF THE PROCEDURE A. Requests for a hearing
Sodno tajništvo vsaj en mesec pred obravnavo pošlje strankam vabilo na obravnavo, brez poseganja v primere, v katerih okoliščine upravičujejo, da se jih povabi v krajšem roku.
A main party who wishes to present oral argument must submit a reasoned request for a hearing, within three weeks after service on the parties of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure.
Take predloge lahko vložijo le glavne stranke in morajo biti ustrezno obrazloženi, priložiti jim je treba ustrezna dokazila in jih predložiti Splošnemu sodišču čim prej po prejemu vabila.
That reasoning — which is not to be confused with written pleadings or observations and should not exceed three pages — must be based on a real assessment of the benefit of a hearing to the party in question and must indicate the elements of the case file or arguments which that party considers it necessary to develop or refute more fully at a hearing.
Če se zastopnik stranke ne namerava udeležiti obravnave, mora o tem čim prej po prejemu vabila obvestiti Splošno sodišče.
B. Preparation for the hearing
Skrajšano poročilo za obravnavo, ki ga pripravi sodnik poročevalec, vsebuje le tožbene razloge in jedrnat povzetek trditev strank.
The parties shall be given notice to attend the hearing by the Registry at least one month before it takes place, provided always that, where the circumstances so require, a shorter period of notice may apply.
Morebitna stališča strank glede skrajšanega poročila za obravnavo se lahko predložijo med obravnavo.
In accordance with Article 107(2) of the Rules of Procedure, requests for an adjournment of the hearing shall be granted only in exceptional circumstances.
V tem primeru se ta stališča zabeležijo v zapisnik o obravnavi.
Such requests may be lodged only by the main parties, must state adequate reasons, be accompanied by appropriate supporting documents, and be submitted to the Court as soon as possible after notice to attend has been given.
Skrajšano poročilo za obravnavo ima javnost na voljo pred razpravno dvorano na dan obravnave, razen če je javnost iz obravnave popolnoma izključena.
If the representative of a party intends not to be present at the hearing, he is requested to inform the Court as soon as possible after notice to attend has been given.
Sodni tajnik objavi pred vsako javno obravnavo v jeziku postopka te informacije: dan in uro obravnave, pristojno sestavo, zadevo ali zadeve, ki se bodo obravnavale, in imena strank.
The Court will make every effort to ensure that the parties' representatives receive a summary report for the hearing three weeks before the hearing.
Prošnjo za uporabo nekaterih tehničnih sredstev pri predstavitvi je treba podati vsaj dva tedna pred dnevom obravnave.
The purpose of the summary report for the hearing is to enable the parties to prepare for the hearing.
Če predsednik prošnji ugodi, se s sodnim tajništvom določijo podrobna pravila o uporabi teh sredstev, pri čemer se upoštevajo morebitne tehnične ali praktične omejitve.
The summary report for the hearing, drawn up by the Judge-Rapporteur, shall be confined to setting out the pleas in law and a succinct summary of the parties' arguments.
Edini cilj predstavitve je ponazoritev podatkov iz spisa v zadevi in zato ta ne sme vsebovati novih razlogov ali novih dokazov.
Any observations the parties may wish to make on the summary report for the hearing may be made at the hearing.
Nosilci teh predstavitev se ne vložijo v spis v zadevi in se zato ne vročijo drugim strankam, razen če predsednik ne odloči drugače.
In such cases, a reference to such observations shall be recorded in the minutes of the hearing.
Upoštevajoč varnostne ukrepe, ki veljajo za vstop v stavbe Sodišča Evropske unije, se zastopnikom strank priporoča, da so v razpravni dvorani navzoči vsaj 15 minut pred začetkom obravnave, saj je običajno, da se člani sestave z njimi pogovorijo o izvedbi obravnave.
The summary report for the hearing shall be made available to the public outside the courtroom on the day of the hearing, unless the case is to be entirely heard in camera.
Za pripravo udeležbe na obravnavi se zastopnikom strank priporoča ogled dokumenta ‚Pregledni seznam – Obravnava‘, ki je na voljo na spletnem mestu Sodišča Evropske unije.
Before every public hearing the Registrar shall cause the following information to be displayed outside the courtroom in the language of the case: the date and time of the hearing, the competent formation of the Court, the case(s) which will be called and the names of the parties.
C. Potek obravnave
A request to use particular technical means for the purposes of a presentation must be made at least two weeks before the date of the hearing.
Zastopniki strank morajo nositi togo.
If the request is approved by the President, the arrangements for such use of technology should be made with the Registry, so that any technical or practical constraints can be taken into account.
Obravnavo sestavljajo:
The sole object of the presentation shall be to illustrate the information contained in the case file and it must not, therefore, contain new pleas in law or new evidence.
po potrebi zelo strnjena ponovitev stališč, tako da se poudarijo bistveni razlogi, navedeni pisno;
Supporting material for such presentations shall not be placed on the case file, nor, therefore, shall it be served on the other parties, unless the President otherwise decides.
po potrebi pojasnitev nekaterih trditev, navedenih v pisnem delu postopka, in morebitna predstavitev novih trditev, ki izhajajo iz dogodkov, ki so se zgodili po koncu pisnega dela postopka in ki jih zato ni bilo mogoče navesti v pisnih navedbah;
In view of the security measures in place to control access to the buildings of the Court of Justice of the European Union, it is recommended that the parties' representatives take the necessary steps to ensure that they are present in the courtroom at least 15 minutes before the hearing is due to start, as the members of the formation of the Court will normally wish to discuss the organisation of the hearing with them.
odgovori na morebitna vprašanja Splošnega sodišča.
In order to prepare for their participation in a hearing, the parties' representatives are invited to consult the following document, which is available on the internet site of the Court of Justice of the European Union: “Aide-mémoire: Hearing of oral argument”.
Vsaka stranka mora ob upoštevanju namena obravnave, kot je bil opredeljen v točki 156 zgoraj, presoditi, ali so ustne navedbe resnično koristne oziroma ali bi zadostovalo zgolj sklicevanje na pisna stališča ali vloge.
C. Conduct of the hearing
Obravnava se torej lahko osredotoči na odgovore na vprašanja Splošnega sodišča.
The parties' representatives shall be required to appear before the Court in their gowns.
Če zastopnik meni, da mora prevzeti besedo, mu je priporočeno, da se omeji na predstavitev določenih točk in se glede drugih sklicuje na vloge.
The purpose of the hearing shall be:
Če je Splošno sodišče pred izvedbo obravnave v skladu s členom 89(4) Poslovnika stranke pozvalo, naj svoje navedbe osredotočijo na eno ali več določenih vprašanj, je treba ta vprašanja prednostno navesti med podajanjem navedb.
where necessary, to reiterate in condensed form the position taken by the parties, emphasising the key submissions advanced in writing;
Če se stranka vzdrži ustnih navedb, njen molk ne pomeni strinjanja z navedbami druge stranke, če so bile zadevne navedbe že izpodbijane pisno.
to clarify, if necessary, certain arguments advanced during the written part of the procedure and to submit any new material arising from events occurring after the close of the written part of the procedure and which therefore could not have been set out in the pleadings;
Ta molk tej stranki ne preprečuje, da na ustne navedbe druge stranke poda repliko.
to reply to any questions put by the Court.
Zaradi jasnosti in da bi članom Splošnega sodišča zagotovili boljše razumevanje ustnih navedb, je na splošno bolj priporočljiv prosti govor na podlagi zapiskov kot pa branje besedila.
It will be for each party to assess, in the light of the purpose of the hearing, as defined in point 156 above, whether oral argument is really necessary or whether it would be sufficient simply to refer to the written observations or pleadings.
Prav tako se od zastopnikov strank zahteva, naj čim bolj poenostavijo predstavitev zadeve in raje uporabljajo krajše povedi.
The hearing can then concentrate on the replies to questions put by the Court.
Poleg tega bi zastopniki Splošnemu sodišču olajšali delo, če bi navedbe strukturirali in predhodno natančno predstavili, kako jih nameravajo podati.
If the representative does consider it necessary to address the Court, it is recommended that he confine himself to making specific points and referring to the pleadings in relation to other points.
Da bi se Splošnemu sodišču lahko pojasnila nekatera tehnična vprašanja, lahko predsednik sestave zastopnikom strank dovoli, da besedo predajo osebam, ki so – čeprav niso zastopniki – primernejši za oblikovanje stališča.
Where, before the hearing, the Court has invited the parties, in accordance with Article 89(4) of the Rules of Procedure, to concentrate in their oral pleadings on one or more specified issues, those issues must be addressed as a matter of priority in the oral submissions.
Te osebe nastopajo le v navzočnosti in pod odgovornostjo zastopnika zadevne stranke.
If a party refrains from presenting oral argument, this shall not constitute acquiescence in the oral argument presented by another party where the arguments in question have already been refuted in writing.
Te osebe morajo, preden prevzamejo besedo, izkazati svojo istovetnost.
Such silence shall not preclude that party from responding to the other party's submission.
Trajanje podajanja navedb se lahko razlikuje glede na zapletenost zadeve in obstoj ali neobstoj novih dejstev.
In the interests of clarity and in order to enable the Members of the Court to understand oral submissions better, it will generally be preferable for Counsel to speak freely on the basis of notes rather than to read out a written text.
Za podajanje svojih navedb ima vsaka glavna stranka na voljo 15 minut, vsak intervenient pa 10 minut (v združenih zadevah ima vsaka glavna stranka 15 minut za vsako od zadev in vsak intervenient 10 minut za vsako od zadev), razen če jim je sodno tajništvo v zvezi s tem dalo drugačna navodila.
The parties' representatives are also requested to simplify their presentation of the case as far as possible and to use short sentences.
Ta omejitev velja le za same ustne navedbe in ne vključuje časa, potrebnega za odgovarjanje na vprašanja, postavljena na obravnavi, ali za končne replike.
It would also assist the Court if representatives could structure their oral argument and indicate, before developing it, the structure they intend to adopt.
Če je zaradi okoliščin to potrebno, se lahko na sodno tajništvo vsaj dva tedna (oziroma v izjemnih, ustrezno obrazloženih okoliščinah tudi pozneje) pred datumom obravnave naslovi predlog za odobritev izjeme od tega običajnega trajanja, ki ga je treba ustrezno obrazložiti in ob tem natančno navesti čas podajanja ustnih navedb, ki naj bi bil za to potreben.