natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See, among others, Human European Consultancy in partnership with the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights, October 2010, A Study on Equality Bodies set up under Directives 2000/43/EC, 2004/113/EC, and 2006/54/EC, page 177, and European Network of Equality Bodies, October 2012, Equality Bodies.
Glej med drugim A Study on Equality Bodies set up under Directives 2000/43/EC, 2004/113/EC, and 2006/54/EC (Študija o organih za enakost, ustanovljenih v skladu z direktivami 2000/43/ES, 2004/113/ES in 2006/54/ES), Human European Consultancy v sodelovanju z inštitutom Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights, oktober 2010, str. 177, in Equality Bodies.
Current Challenges.
Current Challenges (Organi za enakost.
Human European Consultancy, op.cit, pages 78, 125, 142, and European Network of Equality Bodies, op.cit., pages 8 and 17.
Sedanji izzivi), Evropska mreža organov za enakost, oktober 2012.
See also European Network of Equality Bodies, Strategic Role of Equality Bodies, 2009, pages 43-44 and 52.
Op. cit., Human European Consultancy, strani 78, 125 in 142, ter op. cit., Evropska mreža organov za enakost, strani 8 in 17.
Human European Consultancy, op.cit., pages 70-145 and European Network of Equality Bodies, op.cit., pages 8 and 13-20.
Glej tudi Strategic Role of Equality Bodies (Strateška vloga organov za enakost), Evropska mreža organov za enakost, 2009, strani 43–44 in 52.
European Commission, 2006, Catalysts for Change?
Op. cit., Human European Consultancy, strani 70–145, in op. cit., Evropska mreža organov za enakost, strani 8 in 13–20.
Equality bodies according to Directive 2000/43/EC — existence, independence and effectiveness, page 57.
Catalysts for Change?
Joint report on the application of Directives 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (‘Racial Equality Directive’) and of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (‘Employment Equality Directive’), COM(2014) 2 final.
Equality bodies according to Directive 2000/43/EC — existence, independence and effectiveness (Katalizatorji sprememb?
Report on the application of Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, COM(2015) 190 final.
Organi za enakost v skladu z Direktivo 2000/43/ES – obstoj, neodvisnost in učinkovitost), Evropska komisija, 2006, stran 57.
This need was also mentioned in the Midterm review of the EU framework for national Roma integration strategies, COM(2017) 458 final; by the Fundamental Rights Agency's Fundamental Rights Report of May 2017; in the Report on the implementation of Commission Recommendation on strengthening the principle of equal pay between men and women through transparency, COM(2017) 671 final.
Skupno poročilo o uporabi Direktive 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost (direktiva o rasni enakosti) in Direktive Sveta 2000/78/ES z dne 27. novembra 2000 o splošnih okvirih enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu (direktiva o enakosti pri zaposlovanju), COM(2014) 2 final.
Report on the implementation of Commission Recommendation on strengthening the principle of equal pay between men and women through transparency, op.cit.; EU Action Plan 2017-2019 Tackling the gender pay gap, COM(2017) 678 final.
Poročilo o uporabi Direktive 2004/113/ES o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri dostopu do blaga in storitev ter oskrbi z njimi, COM(2015) 190 final.
European Parliament resolution of 8 October 2015 on the application of Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (2014/2160(INI)).
Ta potreba je bila omenjena tudi v Vmesnem pregledu okvira EU za nacionalne strategije vključevanja Romov, COM(2017) 458 final; poročilu Agencije za temeljne pravice o temeljnih pravicah, objavljenem maja 2017, in Poročilu o izvajanju Priporočila Komisije o krepitvi načela enakega plačila za ženske in moške s preglednostjo, COM(2017) 671 final.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), UN General Assembly Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles), Resolution 48/134, 20 December 1993, and the General Observations on the interpretation and implementation of these principles by the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, in their wording of 21 February 2018.
Poročilo o izvajanju Priporočila Komisije o krepitvi načela enakega plačila za ženske in moške s preglednostjo, op. cit.; Akcijski načrt EU za obdobje 2017–2019 – Spoprijemanje z razliko v plačah med spoloma, COM(2017) 678 final.
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), General Policy Recommendation No2 revised on Equality Bodies to combat racism and intolerance at national level, CRI(2018) 06, adopted on 7 December 2017.
Revidirano splošno politično priporočilo št. 2 o organih za enakost, ki se borijo proti rasizmu in nestrpnosti na nacionalni ravni, CRI(2018) 6, Evropska komisija proti rasizmu in nestrpnosti (ECRI), sprejeto 7. decembra 2017.
Council Decision 2010/48/EC of 26 November 2009 concerning the conclusion, by the European Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (OJ L 23, 27.1.2010, p. 35).
Sklep Sveta z dne 26. novembra 2009 o sklenitvi Konvencije Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov s strani Evropske skupnosti (UL L 23, 27.1.2010, str. 35).
Every four years under Directive 2006/54/EC and every five years under Directives 2000/43/EC, 2000/78/EC and 2004/113/EEC.
V skladu z Direktivo 2006/54/ES vsaka štiri leta, v skladu z direktivami 2000/43/ES, 2000/78/ES in 2004/113/EGS pa vsakih pet let.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2018/1149
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2018/1149
on non-binding guidelines for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas and other supply chain risks under Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o nezavezujočih smernicah za opredelitev konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem ter drugih tveganj v oskrbovalni verigi v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2017/821 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Natural mineral resources hold great potential for development but can, in conflict-affected or high-risk areas, be a cause of dispute where their revenues fuel the outbreak or continuation of violent conflict, undermining endeavours towards development, good governance and the rule of law.
Naravni mineralni viri imajo velik potencial za razvoj, vendar so lahko na konfliktnih območjih ali območjih z visokim tveganjem razlog za spor, kadar prihodki, povezani z njimi, podžigajo nastanek ali nadaljevanje nasilnih konfliktov ter s tem spodkopavajo prizadevanja za razvoj, dobro upravljanje in pravno državo.
To address such concerns, Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council lays down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas; which will apply from 1 January 2021 (hereinafter the ‘Regulation’).
Za odpravo teh pomislekov Uredba (EU) 2017/821 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta določa obveznosti potrebne skrbnosti v oskrbovalni verigi za uvoznike v Uniji, ki uvažajo kositer, tantal in volfram, njihove rude ter zlato s poreklom s konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem; uporabljala pa se bo od 1. januarja 2021 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba).
Conflict-affected and high-risk areas for the purposes of that Regulation are defined as areas in a state of armed conflict or fragile post-conflict as well as areas witnessing weak or non-existent governance and security, such as failed states, and widespread and systematic violations of international law, including human rights abuses.
Konfliktna območja in območja z visokim tveganjem za namene navedene uredbe so opredeljena kot območja, kjer potekajo oboroženi konflikti, ali nestabilna pokonfliktna območja in območja s šibkima ali neobstoječima upravljanjem in varnostjo, kot so propadle države, ter razširjenimi in sistematičnimi kršitvami mednarodnega prava, vključno s kršitvami človekovih pravic.
Article 14(1) of that Regulation sets out that in order to create clarity and certainty for and consistency among the practices of economic operators, in particular SMEs, the Commission, in consultation with the European External Action Service and the OECD, is to prepare non-binding guidelines for economic operators, explaining how best to apply the criteria for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas (hereinafter the ‘Guidelines’).
Člen 14(1) navedene uredbe določa, da zaradi zagotavljanja jasnosti in gotovosti praks gospodarskih subjektov, zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij, in skladnosti med temi praksami, Komisija v posvetovanju z Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje in OECD pripravi nezavezujoče smernice za gospodarske subjekte, v njih pa pojasni najboljšo uporabo meril za določitev konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Smernice).
That Article also sets out that these Guidelines are to be based on the definition of conflict-affected and high-risk areas set out in the Regulation and are to take into account the OECD Due Diligence Guidance in this field, including other supply chain risks triggering red flags as defined in the relevant supplements to that Guidance.
Ta člen določa tudi, da morajo te smernice temeljiti na opredelitvi konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem, kot je določena v Uredbi, in upoštevati smernice OECD o potrebni skrbnosti na tem področju, vključno z drugimi tveganji v oskrbovalni verigi, ki sprožijo opozorila, kot so opredeljena v zadevnih dopolnilih teh smernic.
These Guidelines, to be effective, should set out the general concept of due diligence in supply chains of minerals and metals associated with conflict-affected and high-risk areas and the steps companies should take to identify and address the risks in this regard relating to the sourcing of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold.
Da bi bile učinkovite, bi morale te smernice določati splošen koncept potrebne skrbnosti v oskrbovalnih verigah z minerali in kovinami v povezavi s konfliktnimi območji in območji z visokim tveganjem ter ukrepe, ki bi jih morale družbe sprejeti za opredelitev in reševanje tveganj, v zvezi s pridobivanjem kositra, tantala, volframa in zlata.
It should be recalled that the Regulation's requirements for Union importers do not only relate to metals and minerals originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, but also to associated risks along the upstream chain with regard to, e.g. trading, handling and exporting.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da zahteve Uredbe za uvoznike v Uniji ne zadevajo le kovin in mineralov s poreklom s konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem, temveč tudi z njimi povezana tveganja v zgornjem delu oskrbovalne verige, npr. s trgovanjem, obdelavo in izvozom.
These Guidelines should also explain the key principles of the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas for the specific purpose of implementing the Regulation, while the definition and explanation of such areas are without prejudice to the Union's position on what may constitute conflict-affected and high-risk areas outside the context of that Regulation.
Te smernice bi morale pojasniti tudi ključna načela za opredelitev konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem za posebne namene izvajanja Uredbe, opredelitve in razlaga teh območij pa ne bi smele posegati v stališče Unije o tem, kaj so lahko konfliktna območja in območja z visokim tveganjem zunaj okvira navedene uredbe.
Reference to relevant open-source information that economic operators can use in identifying conflict-affected and high-risk areas should be a central part of these Guidelines, while recalling that relevant sources are updated with varying periodicity and should be complemented with other sources as appropriate.
Sklici na ustrezne prosto dostopne vire, ki jih gospodarski subjekti lahko uporabijo pri opredeljevanju konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem, bi moralo biti osrednji del teh smernic, pri tem pa je treba opozoriti, da se zadevni viri posodabljajo v različnih časovnih presledkih in bi jih bilo treba po potrebi dopolniti z drugimi viri.
Other supply chain risks triggering red flags addressed by these Guidelines should relate to location, suppliers and unusual circumstances of trading operations and should be based on the OECD's work in this field.
Druga tveganja v oskrbovalni verigi, ki sprožijo opozorila iz teh smernic, bi se morala nanašati na lokacijo, dobavitelje in neobičajne okoliščine trgovalnih dejavnosti in bi morala temeljiti na prizadevanjih OECD na tem področju.
Article 14(2) of the Regulation sets out that the Commission is to call on external expertise that will provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, regularly updated list of conflict-affected and high-risk areas.
Člen 14(2) Uredbe določa, da se Komisija opre na zunanje strokovno znanje, ki zagotovi okviren in neizčrpen seznam konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem, ki se redno posodablja.
That forthcoming list is to be based on the external experts' analysis of these Guidelines and other existing information from, inter alia, academics and supply chain due diligence schemes.
Navedeni seznam bodo zunanji strokovnjaki sestavili na podlagi analize teh smernic in drugih obstoječih informacij, med drugim s strani akademikov in iz shem za potrebno skrbnost v oskrbovalni verigi.
These Guidelines are non-binding and Union importers maintain their responsibility to comply with the due diligence obligations under the Regulation, while the services of the Commission ensure that these Guidelines remain relevant over time,
Te smernice niso zavezujoče in uvozniki v Uniji ohranijo svojo odgovornost izpolnjevanja obveznosti za potrebno skrbnost iz te uredbe, medtem ko službe Komisije zagotovijo, da se te smernice uporabljajo tudi v prihodnje –
Union importers with obligations under Regulation (EU) 2017/821 should follow the non-binding guidelines provided in the Annex to this Recommendation.
Uvozniki v Uniji z obveznostmi iz Uredbe (EU) 2017/821 bi morali upoštevati nezavezujoče smernice iz Priloge k temu priporočilu.
The guidelines can be followed also by other entities applying due diligence to their mineral supply chain.
V Bruslju, 10. avgusta 2018
This Recommendation will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Za Komisijo
Done at Brussels, 10 August 2018.
Članica Komisije
For the Commission
Uredba (EU) 2017/821 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2017 o določitvi obveznosti za potrebno skrbnost v oskrbovalni verigi za uvoznike v Uniji, ki uvažajo kositer, tantal in volfram, njihove rude ter zlato, ki izvirajo s konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem (UL L 130, 19.5.2017, str. 1).
Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas (OJ L 130, 19.5.2017, p. 1).
CILJ TEH SMERNIC
ANNEX
V skladu s členom 14(1) Uredbe je Evropska komisija pozvana, naj za gospodarske subjekte pripravi nezavezujoče smernice v obliki priročnika, v njih pa pojasni najboljšo uporabo meril za določitev konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem.
Regulation (EU) 2017/821 (hereinafter ‘the Regulation’) entered into force on 8 June 2017 and applies to Union importers (including but not limited to smelters and refiners) as from 1 January 2021.
V tem smernicah:
As set out in its first Article, the Regulation is designed to provide transparency and certainty as regards the sourcing practices of Union importers sourcing from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.
v ODDELKU 2 so določeni splošni koncept potrebne skrbnosti v oskrbovalnih verigah z minerali, ki izvirajo s konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem, in ukrepi, ki bi jih morala podjetja sprejeti za opredelitev in obravnavo tveganj, povezanih s pridobivanjem kositra, tantala, volframa in zlata,
According to Article 14(1) of the Regulation, the European Commission is tasked with the preparation of non-binding guidelines in the form of a handbook for economic operators, explaining how best to apply the criteria for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas.
v ODDELKU 3 so pojasnjeni ključni elementi opredelitve konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem za namene Uredbe,
This Article also sets out that the guidelines are to take into account the OECD Due Diligence Guidance in this field, including other supply chain risks triggering the so-called ‘red flags’, as defined in the relevant supplements to that Guidance.
v ODDELKU 4 so našteti viri javno dostopnih informacij za pomoč podjetjem pri opredelitvi konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem ter drugih tveganj,
In these guidelines,
v ODDELKU 5 so navedene informacije o drugih kazalnikih možnih tveganj (ali opozorilih) v oskrbovalni verigi z minerali, in sicer v zvezi z lokacijo, dobavitelji in neobičajnimi okoliščinami trgovanja.
SECTION 2 sets out the general concept of due diligence in supply chains of minerals originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas and the steps companies should take to identify and address the risks associated with sourcing of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold.
Te smernice so oblikovane za pomoč uvoznikom EU pri izvajanju potrebne skrbnosti v oskrbovalni verigi.
SECTION 3 explains the key elements of the definition of conflict-affected and high-risk areas for the purposes of the Regulation.
Ne posegajo v Uredbo (EU) 2017/821 in niso pravno zavezujoče.
SECTION 4 lists open source information to help companies identify conflict-affected and high-risk areas and other risks.
Poleg tega je treba omeniti, da se bo v skladu s členom 14(2) Uredbe Evropska komisija (naknadno) oprla na zunanje strokovno znanje, ki bo zagotovilo okviren in neizčrpen seznam konfliktnih območij in območij z visokim tveganjem, ki se bo redno posodabljal.
SECTION 5 provides information on other indicators of potential risks (or ‘red flags’) in the mineral supply chain in relation to location, suppliers, and unusual circumstances of trading operations.
Ta seznam bo temeljil na analizi teh smernic in obstoječih informacij s strani zunanjih strokovnjakov, med drugim informacij s strani vlad, mednarodnih organizacij, akademikov in shem za potrebno skrbnost v oskrbovalni verigi.
These guidelines are designed to help EU importers carry out their supply chain due diligence.
POTREBNA SKRBNOST V OSKRBOVALNI VERIGI Z MINERALI – SPLOŠEN KONCEPT IN UKREPI
They are without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2017/821 and are not legally binding.
Koncept potrebne skrbnosti na podlagi tveganja
Furthermore, it should be noted that pursuant to Article 14(2) of the Regulation, the European Commission will (subsequently) call upon external expertise that will provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, regularly updated list of conflict-affected and high-risk areas.
Na konfliktnih območjih in območjih z visokim tveganjem imajo podjetja, ki se ukvarjajo z rudarjenjem in predelavo mineralov ter trgovanjem z njimi, možnost, da ustvarjajo dohodek, rast in blaginjo, omogočajo preživljanje in spodbujajo lokalni razvoj.
That list will be based on the external experts' analysis of these guidelines and existing information from, inter alia, governments, international organisations, academics and supply chain due diligence schemes.
V takšnih primerih lahko podjetja tvegajo, da bodo prispevala k večjim negativnim učinkom ali bila povezana z njimi, in sicer v zvezi z njihovimi dejavnostmi ali odločitvami o viru pridobivanja, vključno z oboroženimi spopadi in hudimi kršitvami človekovih pravic.
DUE DILIGENCE IN THE MINERAL SUPPLY CHAIN — GENERAL CONCEPT AND STEPS
S tega vidika bi morala podjetja za zagotovitev, da ne bi namerno ali nenamerno prispevala k tem negativnim učinkom ali bila (še naprej) povezana z njimi, v okviru tekočih, proaktivnih in reaktivnih procesov, ki so trdno integrirani v njihov sistem upravljanja, izvajati potrebno skrbnost na podlagi tveganja.
The concept of risk-based due diligence
Na splošno se potrebna skrbnost na podlagi tveganja nanaša na ukrepe, ki jih morajo sprejeti podjetja za opredelitev in obravnavo dejanskih ali potencialnih tveganj v svoji oskrbovalni verigi z minerali, da preprečijo ali ublažijo vsak prispevek k negativnim učinkom, povezanim z ekstrakcijo, proizvodnjo, trgovanjem, predelavo, ravnanjem z minerali in njihovim izvozom, ki so posledica delovanja na konfliktnih območjih in območjih z visokim tveganjem.
In conflict-affected and high-risk areas, companies involved in mining, processing and trade in minerals have the potential to generate income, growth and prosperity, sustain livelihoods and foster local development.
Tveganja so opredeljena glede na potencialno negativne učinke delovanja danega podjetja, ki izhajajo iz dejavnosti podjetja ali pa so lahko neposredno povezana z dejavnostmi, proizvodi ali storitvami, ki se izvajajo na podlagi poslovnih razmerij s tretjimi stranmi, vključno z dobavitelji in drugimi subjekti v dobavni verigi.
In such situations, companies may also be at risk of contributing to or being associated with significant adverse impacts associated with their activities or sourcing decisions, including armed conflict and serious human rights abuses.
Negativni učinki lahko vključujejo škodo za ljudi (tj. zunanji učinki), škodo zaradi izgube ugleda ali pravno odgovornost podjetja (tj. notranji učinki) ali oboje.
In this perspective, to ensure that companies do not intentionally or unintentionally contribute to or become (or continue to be) associated with these adverse impacts, they should conduct risk-based due diligence as part of an on-going, proactive and reactive process firmly integrated into their management system.
Podjetja se lahko soočajo s tveganji v svojih oskrbovalnih verigah z minerali, ker lahko okoliščine ekstrakcije, proizvodnje, trgovanja, ravnanja z minerali ali njihovega izvoza zaradi svoje narave pomenijo večje tveganje večjih negativnih učinkov, kot so financiranje konfliktov ali podžiganje, spodbujanje ali zaostrovanje pogojev konflikta, kot je navedeno v Prilogi II k smernicam OECD o potrebni skrbnosti in njihovih dopolnilih.
Generally, risk-based due diligence refers to the steps companies should take to identify and address actual or potential risks in their mineral supply chain in order to prevent or mitigate any contribution to adverse impacts related to the extraction, production, trading, processing, handling and export of minerals associated with conflict-affected and high-risk areas.
Zaradi teh tveganj bi si morala podjetja v dobri veri prizadevati za opredelitev in oceno tveganj, povezanih z lokacijo, dobaviteljem ali okoliščinami, ter sprejeti ukrepe potrebne skrbnosti, prilagojene posebnim zahtevam takih tveganj.
Risks are defined in relation to the potentially adverse impacts of a given company's operations, which result from the company's own activities or which may be directly linked to operations, products or services by its business relationships with third parties, including suppliers and other entities in the supply chain.
Potrebna skrbnost lahko podjetjem tudi pomaga zagotoviti spoštovanje mednarodnega prava in skladnost z nacionalnimi zakoni, vključno s tistimi, ki urejajo nezakonito trgovanje z mineralnimi viri, pa tudi spoštovanje sankcij ZN in sklepov EU na podlagi Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), zlasti omejevalnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 215 PDEU.