natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In Annex XV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509, the following persons are added to the list of persons set out under the heading ‘(c) Natural persons designated in accordance with point (b) of Article 34(4)’:
Ime (in morebitni vzdevki)
Name (and possible aliases)
Podatki za ugotavljanje istovetnosti
Date of designation
Razlogi
Reasons
Datum rojstva: 2.12.1947
DOB: 6.5.1981
KIM Kyong Hui skupaj z možem KIMOM Sujem Gwangom, tastom KIMOM Yongom Namom in taščo Djang Tcheul Hy sodeluje v vzorcu goljufivih finančnih praks, ki bi lahko prispevale k programom DLRK, povezanim z jedrskim orožjem, balističnimi izstrelki ali drugim orožjem za množično uničevanje.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/603
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/603
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code, and in particular Article 57(4) and Article 58(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. oktobra 2013 o carinskem zakoniku Unije ter zlasti člena 57(4) in člena 58(2) Uredbe,
An inflatable cushion of plastics (so-called ‘wheelchair cushion’), measuring approximately 40 × 40 cm, consisting of two rectangular interconnected chambers filled with air.
Napihljiva blazina iz plastike (tako imenovana „blazina za invalidski voziček“), ki meri približno 40 × 40 cm in je sestavljena iz dveh pravokotnih medsebojno povezanih komor napolnjenih z zrakom.
Each chamber contains an air filled bag of plastics covered with a thin layer of silicone.
V vsaki komori je vrečka iz plastike, ki je napolnjena z zrakom in prekrita s tanko plastjo silikona.
The cushion is adjustable according to the degree to which the two chambers are inflated, which causes the position of the bag of plastics in each chamber to shift when the user is sitting on the cushion.
Oblika blazine se prilagodi glede na stopnjo napihnjenosti komor, kar povzroči, da se položaj vrečk iz plastike v komorah spremeni, ko uporabnik sede na blazino.
The cushion has a removable anti-slip cover of textile materials that has two ‘velcro’-type straps attached to its underside.
Blazina ima protizdrsno prevleko iz blaga, ki se lahko odstrani, na spodnji strani pa ima dva sprimna trakova.
The article is intended to prevent the user developing pressure sores.
Izdelek je namenjen preprečevanju nastajanja preležanin.
It provides a relieving effect on the seat bones and improves the comfort of the user.
Zagotavlja razbremenilni učinek na sedne kosti in izboljšuje udobje uporabnika.
See images
Glej sliki.
Classification is determined by general rules 1, 3(b) and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 3926, 392690 and 39269097.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošna pravila 1, 3(b) in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature ter besedilo oznak KN 3926, 392690 in 39269097.
Classification of the article under heading 9404 (articles of bedding and similar furnishing) is excluded because pneumatic cushions are excluded from this heading within the meaning of note 1 (a) to Chapter 94 and, consequently, pneumatic cushions of plastics are classified under heading 3926 (see also the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes (HSEN) to heading 9404, last paragraph, (b)).
Uvrstitev izdelka pod tarifno številko 9404 (polnjena posteljnina in podobna posteljna oprema) je izključena, saj so napihljive blazine iz te tarifne številke izključene v smislu opombe 1(a) k poglavju 94, posledično se napihljive blazine iz plastičnih mas uvrščajo pod tarifno številko 3926 (glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema (HS) k tarifni številki 9404, zadnji odstavek (b)).
Classification under CN code 87142000 as parts and accessories of carriages for disabled persons is also excluded, because the article is not identifiable as being suitable for use solely or principally with carriages for disabled persons within the meaning of note 3 to Section XVII.
Uvrstitev pod oznako KN 87142000 kot deli in pribor za vozičke za invalidne osebe je prav tako izključena, saj izdelek ni prepoznaven kot primeren za uporabo izključno ali pretežno z vozički za invalidne osebe v smislu opombe 3 k oddelku XVII.
Considering its objective characteristics, the article can be used on many seats and chairs as well as on seats of wheelchairs.
Izdelek se glede na svoje objektivne značilnosti lahko uporablja na različnih sedežih in stolih ter sedežih invalidskih vozičkov.
For example, the article is not designed for use with a specific seat, because it has no specific means by which it can be attached that would identify it for use with a specific seat.
Izdelek na primer ni zasnovan za uporabo s posebnim sedežem, saj ne vključuje posebne opreme za pritrditev, ki bi določala njegovo uporabo z določenim sedežem.
The anti-slip cover and the ‘velcro’-type straps can be attached to many different types of seats.
Protizdrsna prevleka in sprimna trakova se lahko pritrdijo na številne različne vrste sedežev.
There is therefore nothing to identify the article as being designed for use with a specific type of seat (see also the HSEN to heading 8714, first paragraph, (i)).
Izdelka zato nič ne opredeljuje kot zasnovanega za uporabo s posebno vrsto sedeža (glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema k tarifni številki 8714, prvi odstavek (i)).
Moreover, classification under CN code 87142000 as parts and accessories of carriages for disabled persons is excluded because the article is neither indispensable for the functioning of the wheelchair, nor does it adapt the wheelchair for a particular operation or increase its range of operations or enable it to perform a particular service connected with its main function which is enabling a handicapped person to move (see judgment of the Court of 16 June 2011, Unomedical, C-152/10, ECLI:EU:C:2011:402, paragraphs 29, 30 and 36).
Poleg tega je uvrstitev pod oznako KN 87142000 kot deli in pribor za vozičke za invalidne osebe izključena, saj izdelek ni nujen za delovanje invalidskega vozička, invalidskega vozička tudi ne prilagodi za posebno delovanje ali razširja njegove možnosti uporabe in ne omogoča posebne uporabe v zvezi z glavno funkcijo, ki omogoča invalidni osebi gibanje (glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 16. junija 2011 v zadevi Unomedical, C-152/10, ECLI:EU:C:2011:402, točke 29, 30 in 36).
A wheelchair operates in the same way as it does without the cushion.
Invalidski voziček deluje na enak način kot brez blazine.
The cushion merely makes the wheelchair more comfortable and endurable for the user.
Z blazino postane uporaba invalidskega vozička le udobnejša in vzdržnejša.
Although the article consists of different components (the cushion of plastics and the cover of textile materials), the article is to be classified as if it consisted of the cushion of plastics because the cushion gives the article its essential character within the meaning of general rule 3 (b).
Čeprav je izdelek sestavljen iz različnih sestavnih delov (blazina iz plastike in prevleka iz blaga), se izdelek uvrsti, kot bi bil sestavljen le iz blazine iz plastike, saj ta daje izdelku njegov bistveni značaj v smislu splošnega pravila 3(b).
The textile component is merely a cover that protects and keeps the essential component in place.
Sestavni del iz blaga je le prevleka, ki varuje in ohranja bistveni sestavni del na mestu.
The article is therefore to be classified according to its constituent material under CN code 39269097 as ‘other articles of plastics’.
Izdelek se zato uvrsti glede na sestavni material, in sicer pod oznako KN 39269097 kot „drugi izdelki iz plastičnih mas“.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/604
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/604
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 as regards the procedural rules to facilitate the establishment in the Union of the preferential origin of goods, and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 3510/80 and (EC) No 209/2005
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 v zvezi s postopkovnimi pravili za lažjo določitev preferencialnega porekla blaga v Uniji in o razveljavitvi uredb (EGS) št. 3510/80 in (ES) št. 209/2005
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code, and in particular Article 66(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. oktobra 2013 o carinskem zakoniku Unije in zlasti člena 66(a) Uredbe,
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 lays down, inter alia, the procedural rules, referred to in Article 64(1) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 (‘the Code’), to facilitate the establishment in the Union of the preferential origin of goods.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2447 med drugim določa postopkovna pravila iz člena 64(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakonik) za lažjo določitev preferencialnega porekla blaga v Uniji.
The last sentence of Article 68(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 currently refers to an application mutatis mutandis of Subsections 2 to 9 of Section 2 of that Regulation, which relate to rules of origin for the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) scheme of the Union.
Zadnji stavek člena 68(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 se trenutno nanaša na smiselno uporabo pododdelkov 2 do 9 oddelka 2 navedene uredbe, ki se nanašajo na pravila o poreklu za shemo splošnega sistema preferencialov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: GSP) Unije.
However, only some provisions of those subsections are relevant in the context of the registration of exporters outside the framework of the GSP scheme of the Union.
Vendar so samo nekatere določbe navedenih pododdelkov pomembne v okviru registracije izvoznikov izven okvira sheme GSP Unije.
It is therefore necessary to specify those provisions.
Zato je potrebno te določbe natančneje opredeliti.
Since the obligation for the Commission to provide a third country with which the Union has a preferential arrangement with the addresses of the customs authorities responsible for the verification of a document on origin completed by a registered exporter results in any event from the provisions of the arrangement concerned and, therefore, it should no longer be laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447.
Ker mora obveza Komisije, da tretjim državam, s katerimi ima Unija preferencialno ureditev, zagotovi naslove carinskih organov, ki so odgovorni za preverjanje dokumenta o poreklu, ki ga izpolni registrirani izvoznik, v vsakem primeru izhajati iz določb zadevne ureditve, to ne bi smelo več biti določeno v Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) 2015/2447.
The transitional provision laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 provisionally allowing an exporter who has not been registered but is an approved exporter in the Union to complete a document on origin has become obsolete and should be abolished.
Prehodna določba iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447, ki začasno dovoljuje izvozniku, ki ni bil registriran, vendar je pooblaščeni izvoznik v Uniji, da izpolni dokument o poreklu, je zastarela in bi jo bilo treba odpraviti.
For reasons of simplification and consistency amongst preferential arrangements, small consignments not imported by way of trade should be exempted from the presentation of a document on origin where such exemption is allowed but not directly established in the preferential arrangement.
Zaradi poenostavitve in usklajenosti preferencialnih ureditev bi morale biti majhne pošiljke, ki niso uvožene s trgovanjem, izvzete iz predložitve dokumentov o poreklu, če je taka izjema dovoljena, vendar ni neposredno določena v preferencialni ureditvi.
Considering that there are other ways to identify the exporter and that the signature does not contribute in the Union to the legal status of a document on origin, exporters should not be required to sign such document where this is allowed but not directly established by the preferential arrangement.
Glede na to, da obstajajo drugi načini za identifikacijo izvoznika in da podpis v Uniji ne prispeva k pravnemu statusu dokumenta o poreklu, se od izvoznikov ne bi smelo zahtevati, da podpišejo tak dokument, če je to v preferencialni ureditvi dovoljeno, vendar neposredno ni določeno.
The rules laid down in Article 69 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 regarding the replacement of proofs of preferential origin issued or made out outside the framework of the GSP scheme of the Union should apply more broadly to documents on origin.
Pravila, določena v členu 69 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 glede nadomestnih dokazil o preferencialnem poreklu, izdanih ali sestavljenih izven okvira sheme GSP Unije, bi bilo treba za dokumente o poreklu uporabljati bolj na splošno.
Additionally, the form in which a replacement document on origin can be issued or made out should be clarified.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pojasniti obliko, v kateri se lahko izda ali sestavi nadomestni dokument o poreklu.
Rules should be laid down with the purpose to facilitate the establishment in the Union of the preferential origin of processed products obtained from goods having preferential originating status.
Določiti bi bilo treba pravila za lažjo določitev preferencialnega porekla oplemenitenih izdelkov v Uniji, pridobljenih iz blaga s preferencialnim poreklom.
Since those rules aim at preventing the economic operators concerned from the adverse and unintended consequences of the merger in the Code of the processing under customs control procedure with the inward processing procedure, they should apply retroactively from the date of application of the Code.
Ker je namen navedenih pravil preprečitev škodljivih in nenamernih posledic, ki bi jih lahko utrpeli zadevni gospodarski subjekti zaradi tega, ker je bil v zakoniku postopek predelave pod carinskim nadzorom združen s postopkom aktivnega oplemenitenja, bi se morala uporabljati retroaktivno od datuma uporabe zakonika.
Article 80(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 should include a reference to a new Annex 22-06A containing the application form to be used by exporters of Member States to register in the REX system, Annex 22-06 being thus reserved to the registration of exporters in GSP beneficiary countries.
Člen 80(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 bi moral vključevati sklicevanje na novo Prilogo 22-06A, ki vsebuje obrazec zahtevka, ki ga bodo uporabili izvozniki držav članic za registracijo v sistemu REX, Priloga 22-06 pa je tako rezervirana za registracijo izvoznikov v državah, upravičenih do GSP.
Consequently, that new Annex 22-06A needs to be inserted in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447, while Annex 22-06 to that Regulation should be amended accordingly.
Zato je treba to novo prilogo 22-06A vstaviti v Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/2447, Prilogo 22-06 k navedeni uredbi pa bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Articles 82, 83 and 86 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 should also be amended as a consequence of the introduction of the new Annex 22-06A.
Tudi člene 82, 83 in 86 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 bi bilo treba spremeniti kot posledico uvedbe nove Priloge 22-06A.
Considering that there are other ways to identify the exporter and that the signature does not contribute in the Union to the legal status of the document, exporters should not be required to sign the statement on origin referred to in Article 92 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447.
Glede na to, da obstajajo drugi načini za identifikacijo izvoznika in da podpis v Uniji ne prispeva k pravnemu statusu dokumenta o poreklu, se od izvoznikov ne bi smelo zahtevati, da podpišejo navedbo o poreklu iz člena 92 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447.
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of that Article should apply mutatis mutandis to statements on origin made out by exporters in the Union not only for the purpose of bilateral cumulation as referred to in Article 53 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, but also to declare the origin of goods exported to a beneficiary country of the GSP schemes of Norway, Switzerland or Turkey for the purpose of cumulation with materials originating in the Union.
Odstavki 1, 2 in 3 navedenega člena se smiselno uporabljajo za navedbe o poreklu, ki jih sestavljajo izvozniki v Uniji, ne le za namen bilateralne kumulacije iz člena 53 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2446, ampak tudi za prijavljanje porekla blaga, ki se izvaža v državo, upravičeno do shem GSP Norveške, Švice ali Turčije za namen kumulacije z materiali po poreklu iz Unije.
Article 92 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Člen 92 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex 22-07 to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 should be amended in order to specify the symbol to be indicated by the exporter when the statement on origin relates to products originating in Ceuta and Melilla.
Prilogo 22-07 k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) 2015/2447 bi bilo treba spremeniti, da se določi oznako, ki jo navede izvoznik, ko se navedba o poreklu nanaša na izdelke s poreklom iz Ceute in Melille.
It should also be amended to reflect that when the statement on origin relates to products originating in the Union, the exporter must indicate the origin by means of the symbol ‘EU’.
S spremembo navedene priloge bi bilo treba določiti tudi, da mora izvoznik poreklo označiti z oznako „EU“, kadar se navedba o poreklu nanaša na izdelke s poreklom iz Unije.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3510/80 has become obsolete, given that the provisions which were provided for in that Regulation have been replaced by provisions now laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447.
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 3510/80 je postala zastarela, glede na to, da so bile določbe, določene v tej uredbi, nadomeščene z določbami, ki so zdaj določene v Delegirani uredbi (EU) 2015/2446 in Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) 2015/2447.
Therefore, it should be repealed for the sake of legal certainty and transparency.
Zato bi jo bilo treba zaradi pravne varnosti in preglednosti razveljaviti.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 209/2005 grants derogations from the obligation laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1541/98 to present the proof of origin for textile products falling within Section XI of the Combined Nomenclature.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 209/2005 dodeljuje odstopanja od obveznosti, določenih v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1541/98, da se predložijo dokazila o poreklu za tekstilne izdelke iz oddelka XI kombinirane nomenklature.
Regulation (EC) No 1541/98 has been repealed by Regulation (EU) No 955/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Uredba (EU) št. 955/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta je nadomestila Uredbo (ES) št. 1541/98.
Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 209/2005 has become obsolete and should be repealed for the sake of legal certainty and transparency.
Zato je Uredba (ES) št. 209/2005 zastarela in bi jo bilo treba razveljaviti zaradi pravne varnosti in preglednosti.
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 is amended as follows:
Izvedbena uredba (EU) 2015/2447 se spremeni:
Article 68 is amended as follows:
člen 68 se spremeni:
the last sentence of paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
zadnji stavek odstavka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Articles 80, 82, 83, 84, 86, 87, 89 and 91 of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.’
„Smiselno se uporabljajo členi 80, 82, 83, 84, 86, 87, 89 in 91 te uredbe.“;
in the first sentence of paragraph 2, the words ‘Articles 10 and 15’ are replaced by the words ‘Articles 10(1) and 15’.
v prvem stavku odstavka 2 se besedilo „člena 10 in 15“ nadomesti z besedilom „člena 10(1) in 15“;
paragraphs 3 and 5 are deleted.
odstavka 3 in 5 se črtata;
The following new paragraphs 6 and 7 are inserted:
vstavita se naslednja nova odstavka 6 in 7:
Where a preferential arrangement allows the Union to exempt originating products from the requirement to provide a document on origin, that exemption shall apply under the conditions laid down in Article 103, insofar as those conditions are not provided for in the preferential arrangement concerned.
Kadar preferencialna ureditev Uniji omogoča, da izvzame izdelke s poreklom iz zahteve po predložitvi dokumenta o poreklu, se navedeno izvzetje uporablja pod pogoji, določenimi v členu 103, če ti pogoji niso določeni v zadevni preferencialni ureditvi.
Where a preferential arrangement allows the Union to waive the requirement for a document on origin to be signed by the exporter, no such signature shall be required.’
Če preferencialna ureditev Uniji omogoča odstopanje od zahteve, da mora izvoznik podpisati dokument o poreklu, se takšen podpis ne zahteva.“;
Replacement of documents on origin issued or made out outside the framework of the GSP scheme of the Union
Nadomestni dokumenti o poreklu, izdani ali sestavljeni izven okvira sheme GSP Unije
(Article 64(1) of the Code)
(člen 64(1) zakonika)
Where originating products covered by a document on origin issued or made out previously for the purposes of a preferential tariff measure as referred to in Article 56(2)(d) or (e) of the Code other than the GSP scheme of the Union have not yet been released for free circulation and are placed under the control of a customs office in the Union, the initial document on origin may be replaced by one or more replacement documents on origin for the purposes of sending all or some of those products elsewhere within the Union.
Če izdelki s poreklom, ki jih zajema dokument o poreklu, izdan ali sestavljen predhodno za namene preferencialnega tarifnega ukrepa iz člena 56(2)(d) ali (e) zakonika, razen sheme GSP Unije, še niso bili sproščeni v prosti promet in so dani pod nadzor carinskega urada v Uniji, je mogoče prvotni dokument o poreklu nadomestiti z enim ali več nadomestnih dokumentov o poreklu za namen pošiljanja vseh ali nekaterih od teh izdelkov drugam znotraj Unije.
The replacement document on origin referred to in paragraph 1 may be issued for, or made out by, any of the following, in the same form as the initial document on origin or in the form of a replacement statement on origin, drawn up mutatis mutandis in accordance with Article 101 and Annex 22-20:
Nadomestni dokument o poreklu iz odstavka 1 se lahko izda za ali ga lahko sestavi kateri koli od navedenih subjektov, in sicer v isti obliki kot je bil izdan ali sestavljen prvotni dokument o poreklu blaga ali v obliki nadomestne navedbe o poreklu, sestavljene smiselno v skladu s členom 101 in Prilogo 22-20:
an exporter approved or registered in the Union and re-consigning the goods;
izvoznik, ki je pooblaščen ali registriran v Uniji in ki prepošilja blago;
a re-consignor of the goods in the Union where the total value of originating products in the initial consignment to be split does not exceed the applicable value threshold;
prepošiljatelj blaga v Uniji, kadar skupna vrednost izdelkov s poreklom v prvotni pošiljki, ki se razdeli, ne presega veljavne mejne vrednosti;
a re-consignor of the goods in the Union where the total value of originating products in the initial consignment to be split exceeds the applicable value threshold, and the re-consignor attaches a copy of the initial document on origin to the replacement document on origin.
prepošiljatelj blaga v Uniji, če skupna vrednost izdelkov s poreklom v prvotni pošiljki, ki se razdeli, presega veljavno mejno vrednost, in prepošiljatelj priloži kopijo prvotnega dokumenta o poreklu k nadomestnemu dokumentu o poreklu.
Where the replacement of the initial document on origin is not possible in accordance with the first subparagraph, the replacement document on origin referred to in paragraph 1 may be issued in the form of a movement certificate EUR.1 by the customs office under whose control the goods are placed.
Če v skladu s prvim pododstavkom nadomestitev prvotnega dokumenta o poreklu ni možna, carinski urad, ki ima nadzor nad blagom, lahko izda nadomestni dokument o poreklu iz odstavka 1 v obliki potrdila o gibanju blaga EUR.1.
Where the replacement document on origin is a movement certificate EUR.1, the endorsement made by the customs office issuing the replacement movement certificate EUR.1 shall be placed in box 11 of the certificate.
Če je nadomestni dokument o poreklu potrdilo o gibanju blaga EUR.1, se zaznamek carinskega urada, ki je izdal nadomestno potrdilo o gibanju blaga EUR.1 navede v polju 11 potrdila.