natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Eurojust should also ensure that the data are adequate, relevant, not excessive in relation to the purpose for which they are processed, stored no longer than is necessary for that purpose, and processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of personal data and confidentiality of data processing.
Eurojust bi moral zagotoviti tudi, da so podatki ustrezni, relevantni in ne pretirani glede na namen, za katerega se obdelujejo, da se ne hranijo dlje, kot je to potrebno za zadevni namen, ter da se obdelujejo na način, ki zagotavlja ustrezno varnost osebnih podatkov in zaupnost obdelave podatkov.
Appropriate safeguards for the storage of operational personal data for archiving purposes in the public interest or statistical purposes should be included in Eurojust’s rules of procedure.
V poslovnik Eurojusta bi bilo treba vključiti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe za hrambo operativnih osebnih podatkov za namene arhiviranja v javnem interesu ali za statistične namene.
A data subject should be able to exercise the right of access referred to in Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 to operational personal data relating to him or her which are processed by Eurojust.
Posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, bi moral imeti možnost uveljavljati pravico dostopa iz Uredbe (EU) 2018/1725. do operativnih osebnih podatkov, ki se nanašajo nanj in jih obdeluje Eurojust.
The data subject may make such a request at reasonable intervals, free of charge, to Eurojust or to the national supervisory authority in the Member State of the data subject’s choice.
Posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, lahko ta zahtevek v razumnih časovnih presledkih brezplačno vloži pri Eurojustu ali nacionalnemu nadzornemu organu v državi članici po lastni izbiri.
The data protection provisions of this Regulation are without prejudice to the applicable rules on the admissibility of personal data as evidence in criminal pre-trial and court proceedings.
Določbe o varstvu podatkov iz te uredbe ne posegajo v veljavna pravila o dopustnosti osebnih podatkov kot dokaza v predkazenskih in kazenskih postopkih.
All processing of personal data by Eurojust, within the framework of its competence, for the fulfilment of its tasks should be considered as processing of operational personal data.
Vsakršno obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani Eurojusta v okviru njegovih pristojnosti za izpolnitev njegovih nalog bi bilo treba obravnavati kot obdelavo operativnih osebnih podatkov.
As Eurojust also processes administrative personal data unrelated to criminal investigations, the processing of such data should be subject to the general rules of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
Ker Eurojust obdeluje tudi upravne osebne podatke, ki niso povezani s kazenskimi preiskavami, bi morala za obdelavo takih podatkov veljati splošna pravila iz Uredbe (EU) 2018/1725.
Where operational personal data are transmitted or supplied to Eurojust by the Member State, the competent authority, the national member or the national correspondent for Eurojust should have the right to request rectification or erasure of those operational personal data.
Če operativne osebne podatke Eurojustu pošlje ali predloži država članica, bi moral pristojni organ, nacionalni član ali nacionalni korespondent za Eurojust imeti pravico zahtevati popravek ali izbris teh operativnih osebnih podatkov.
In order to demonstrate compliance with this Regulation, Eurojust or the authorised processor should maintain records regarding all categories of processing activities under its responsibility.
Za dokaz skladnosti s to uredbo bi moral Eurojust ali pooblaščeni obdelovalec hraniti evidence o vseh vrstah dejavnosti obdelave, za katere je odgovoren.
Eurojust and each authorised processor should be obliged to cooperate with the European Data Protection Supervisor (the ‘EDPS’) and to make those records available to it on request, so that they might serve for monitoring those processing operations.
Eurojust in vsak pooblaščeni obdelovalec bi moral biti zavezan k sodelovanju z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov (ENVP) in mu na zahtevo omogočiti dostop do evidenc, ki jih ima na voljo, da se lahko uporabijo za spremljanje teh operacij obdelave.
Eurojust or its authorised processor, when processing personal data in non-automated processing systems, should have in place effective methods of demonstrating the lawfulness of the processing, of enabling self-monitoring and of ensuring data integrity and data security, such as logs or other forms of records.
Eurojust ali pooblaščeni obdelovalec, ko obdeluje osebne podatke v neavtomatiziranih sistemih obdelave, bi moral vzpostaviti učinkovite metode za dokazovanje zakonitosti obdelave, omogočanje notranjega spremljanja ter zagotavljanje neoporečnosti in varnosti podatkov, kot so dnevniki ali druge oblike evidentiranja.
The Executive Board of Eurojust should designate a Data Protection Officer who should be a member of the existing staff.
Izvršni odbor Eurojusta bi moral določiti pooblaščeno osebo za varstvo podatkov, ki bi morala že biti članica osebja.
The person designated as Data Protection Officer of Eurojust should have received specialised training in data protection law and practice for acquiring expert knowledge in that field.
Oseba, določena za pooblaščeno osebo za varstvo podatkov Eurojusta, bi morala opraviti posebno usposabljanje iz prava in prakse s področja varstva podatkov za pridobitev strokovnega znanja na tem področju.
The necessary level of expert knowledge should be determined in relation to the data processing carried out and the protection required for the personal data processed by Eurojust.
Določiti bi bilo treba stopnjo potrebnega strokovnega znanja glede na izvedeno obdelavo podatkov in varstvo, ki je potrebno pri osebnih podatkih, ki jih obdeluje Eurojust.
The EDPS should be responsible for monitoring and ensuring the complete application of the data protection provisions of this Regulation with regard to processing of operational personal data by Eurojust.
ENVP bi moral biti odgovoren za spremljanje in zagotavljanje, da Eurojust pri obdelavi operativnih osebnih podatkov v celoti uporablja določbe o varstvu podatkov iz te uredbe.
The EDPS should be granted powers allowing him or her to fulfil this duty effectively.
Na ENVP bi bilo treba prenesti pooblastila, ki bi mu omogočila učinkovito izpolnjevanje svojih nalog.
The EDPS should have the right to consult Eurojust regarding submitted requests, to refer matters to Eurojust for the purpose of addressing concerns that have emerged regarding its processing of operational personal data, to make proposals for improving the protection of the data subjects, and to order Eurojust to carry out specific operations with regard to processing of operational personal data.
ENVP bi moral imeti pravico, da se v zvezi s predloženimi zahtevki posvetuje z Eurojustom, da predloži zadeve Eurojustu za reševanje nastalih težav pri njegovi obdelavi operativnih osebnih podatkov, da pripravi predloge za izboljšanje varstva posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, ter da Eurojustu odredi, naj izvaja posebne operacije v zvezi z obdelavo operativnih osebnih podatkov.
As a result, the EDPS requires the means to have the orders complied with and executed.
Tako ENVP potrebuje orodja, s katerimi zagotovi, da se njegove odredbe upoštevajo in izvedejo.
He or she should therefore also have the power to warn Eurojust.
Zato bi moral imeti pooblastilo, da Eurojust opozori.
To warn means to issue an oral or written reminder of Eurojust’s obligation to execute the EDPS’ orders or to comply with the proposals of the EDPS and a reminder of the measures to be applied upon any non-compliance or refusal by Eurojust.
Opozoriti pomeni izdati ustno ali pisno opozorilo glede obveznosti Eurojusta, da izvrši odredbe ENVP ali upošteva njegove predloge ter pouk o ukrepih, ki se bodo uporabili v primeru neupoštevanja ali zavrnitve s strani Eurojusta.
The duties and powers of the EDPS, including the power to order Eurojust to carry out the rectification, restriction of processing or erasure of operational personal data which have been processed in breach of the data protection provisions contained in this Regulation, should not extend to the personal data contained in national case files.
Naloge in pooblastila ENVP, kot je pooblastilo, da Eurojustu odredi, da popravi operativne osebne podatke, ki jih je obdelal v nasprotju z določbami o varstvu podatkov iz te uredbe, omeji njihovo obdelovanje ali jih izbriše, se ne bi smele nanašati na osebne podatke v dokumentaciji nacionalnih zadev.
In order to facilitate cooperation between the EDPS and the national supervisory authorities, but without prejudice to the independence of the EDPS or to his or her responsibility for supervision of Eurojust with regard to data protection, the EDPS and national supervisory authorities should regularly meet within the European Data Protection Board, in line with the rules on coordinated supervision laid down in Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
Da bi olajšali sodelovanje med ENVP in nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi, vendar brez poseganja v neodvisnost ENVP ali v njegovo odgovornost za nadzor nad Eurojustom glede varstva podatkov, bi se ENVP in nacionalni nadzorni organi morali redno sestajati v okviru Evropskega odbora za varstvo podatkov v skladu s pravili o usklajenem nadzoru iz Uredbe (EU) 2018/1725.
As the first recipient on the territory of the Union of data provided by or retrieved from third countries or international organisations, Eurojust should be responsible for the accuracy of such data.
Kot prvi prejemnik podatkov, ki jih posredujejo tretje države ali mednarodne organizacije oziroma ki prihajajo iz njih, na ozemlju Unije, bi Eurojust moral biti odgovoren za točnost teh podatkov.
Eurojust should take measures to verify as far as possible the accuracy of the data upon receiving the data or when making data available to other authorities.
Eurojust bi moral sprejeti ukrepe, s katerimi bi lahko v največji možni meri preveril točnost podatkov ob njihovem prejemu ali ob dajanju teh podatkov na voljo drugim organom.
Eurojust should be subject to the general rules on contractual and non-contractual liability applicable to Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.
Za Eurojust bi morala veljati splošna pravila o pogodbeni in nepogodbeni odgovornosti, ki se uporabljajo za institucije, organe, urade in agencije Unije.
Eurojust should be able to exchange relevant personal data and maintain cooperative relations with other Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies to the extent necessary for the fulfilment of its or their tasks.
Eurojustu bi bilo treba omogočiti izmenjavo ustreznih osebnih podatkov z drugimi institucijami, organi, uradi ali agencijami Unije ter ohranjanje sodelovanja z njimi v obsegu, ki je potreben za izpolnjevanje njegovih ali njihovih nalog.
To guarantee purpose limitation, it is important to ensure that personal data can be transferred by Eurojust to third countries and international organisations only if necessary for preventing and combating crime that falls within Eurojust’s tasks.
Za zagotovitev omejitve namena je pomembno zagotoviti, da lahko Eurojust prenese osebne podatke tretjim državam in mednarodnim organizacijam le, če je to potrebno za preprečevanje kaznivih dejanj, ki spadajo med naloge Eurojusta, in boj proti njim.
To this end, it is necessary to ensure that, when personal data are transferred, the recipient gives an undertaking that the data will be used by the recipient or transferred onward to a competent authority of a third country solely for the purpose for which they were originally transferred.
V ta namen je treba pri prenosu osebnih podatkov zagotoviti, da se prejemnik zaveže, da bo podatke uporabil ali jih nadalje prenesel pristojnemu organu tretje države samo za namen, za katerega so bili prvotno preneseni.
Further onward transfer of the data should take place in compliance with this Regulation.
Nadaljnji prenos podatkov bi moral potekati v skladu s to uredbo.
All Member States are affiliated to the International Criminal Police Organisation (Interpol).
Vse države članice so članice Mednarodne organizacije kriminalistične policije (Interpol).
To fulfil its mission, Interpol receives, stores and circulates personal data to assist competent authorities in preventing and combating international crime.
Interpol za izpolnjevanje svojih nalog prejema, shranjuje in razpošilja osebne podatke, s čimer pristojnim organom pomaga pri preprečevanju mednarodnega kriminala in boju proti njemu.
It is therefore appropriate to strengthen cooperation between the Union and Interpol by promoting an efficient exchange of personal data while ensuring respect for fundamental rights and freedoms regarding the automatic processing of personal data.
Zato je primerno izboljšati sodelovanje med Unijo in Interpolom, in sicer s spodbujanjem učinkovite izmenjave osebnih podatkov, hkrati pa zagotavljati spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in svoboščin v zvezi z avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
Where operational personal data are transferred from Eurojust to Interpol, and to countries which have delegated members to Interpol, this Regulation, in particular the provisions on international transfers, should apply.
Pri prenosu operativnih osebnih podatkov od Eurojusta na Interpol in v države, ki imajo svoje predstavnike v Interpolu, bi se morala uporabljati ta uredba, zlasti določbe o mednarodnih prenosih.
This Regulation should be without prejudice to the specific rules laid down in Council Common Position 2005/69/JHA and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA.
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v posebna pravila, določena v Skupnem stališču Sveta 2005/69/PNZ in Sklepu Sveta 2007/533/PNZ.
When Eurojust transfers operational personal data to an authority of a third country or to an international organisation by virtue of an international agreement concluded pursuant to Article 218 TFEU, adequate safeguards should be provided for with respect to the protection of privacy and fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals to ensure that the applicable data protection rules are complied with.
Kadar Eurojust prenese operativne osebne podatke organu tretje države ali mednarodni organizaciji na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, sklenjenega na podlagi člena 218 PDEU, bi bilo zagotoviti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe glede varstva zasebnosti ter temeljnih pravic in svoboščin posameznikov za zagotovitev upoštevanja skladnosti z veljavnimi pravili o varstvu podatkov.
Eurojust should ensure that a transfer to a third country or to an international organisation takes place only if necessary for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security, and that the controller in the third country or international organisation is an authority competent within the meaning of this Regulation.
Eurojust bi moral zagotoviti, da se prenos v tretjo državo ali mednarodno organizacijo izvede samo, če je potreben za preprečevanje, preiskovanje, odkrivanje ali pregon kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, vključno z varovanjem pred grožnjami javni varnosti in njihovim preprečevanjem, ter če je upravljavec v tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji organ, pristojen v smislu te uredbe.
A transfer should be carried out only by Eurojust acting as controller.
Prenos bi moral izvajati le Eurojust kot upravljavec.
Such a transfer may take place in cases where the Commission has decided that the third country or international organisation in question ensures an adequate level of protection, where appropriate safeguards have been provided, or where derogations for specific situations apply.
Tak prenos se lahko izvede v primerih, v katerih je Komisija sklenila, da zadevna tretja država ali mednarodna organizacija zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva, po zagotovitvi ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepov ali ko se uporabljajo odstopanja v posebnih primerih.
Eurojust should be able to transfer personal data to an authority of a third country or an international organisation on the basis of a Commission decision finding that the country or international organisation in question ensures an adequate level of data protection (‘adequacy decision’), or, in the absence of an adequacy decision, an international agreement concluded by the Union pursuant to Article 218 TFEU, or a cooperation agreement allowing for the exchange of personal data concluded between Eurojust and the third country prior to the date of application of this Regulation.
Eurojustu bi bilo treba omogočiti prenos osebnih podatkov organu tretje države ali mednarodni organizaciji na podlagi sklepa Komisije, da zadevna država ali mednarodna organizacija zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva podatkov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o ustreznosti), ali, če ni sklepa o ustreznosti, na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, ki ga je sklenila Unija v skladu s členom 218 PDEU, ali sporazuma o sodelovanju, ki omogoča izmenjavo osebnih podatkov, sklenjenega med Eurojustom in zadevno tretjo državo pred začetkom uporabe te uredbe.
Where the College identifies an operational need for cooperation with a third country or an international organisation, it should be able to suggest that the Council draw the attention of the Commission to the need for an adequacy decision or for a recommendation for the opening of negotiations on an international agreement pursuant to Article 218 TFEU.
Če kolegij opredeli operativno potrebo za sodelovanje s tretjo državo ali mednarodno organizacijo, bi moral imeti možnost predlagati Svetu, naj Komisijo opozori na potrebo po sklepu o ustreznosti ali priporočilu za začetek pogajanj o mednarodnem sporazumu na podlagi člena 218 PDEU.
Transfers not based on an adequacy decision should be allowed only where appropriate safeguards have been provided in a legally binding instrument which ensures the protection of personal data or where Eurojust has assessed all the circumstances surrounding the data transfer and, on the basis of that assessment, considers that appropriate safeguards with regard to the protection of personal data exist.
Prenosi, ki ne temeljijo na sklepu o ustreznosti, bi morali biti dovoljeni samo, če so bili v pravno zavezujočem instrumentu določeni ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi, ki zagotavljajo varstvo osebnih podatkov, ali če je Eurojust ocenil vse okoliščine pri prenosu podatkov in na podlagi te ocene meni, da obstajajo ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi v zvezi z varstvom osebnih podatkov.
Such legally binding instruments could, for example, be legally binding bilateral agreements which have been concluded by the Member States and implemented in their legal order and which could be enforced by their data subjects, ensuring compliance with data protection requirements and the rights of the data subjects, including the right to obtain effective administrative or judicial redress.
Takšni pravno zavezujoči instrumenti bi na primer lahko bili pravno zavezujoči dvostranski sporazumi, ki so jih sklenile države članice in se izvajajo v okviru njihovega pravnega reda ter bi jih lahko uveljavljali posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, iz zadevnih držav in ki zagotavljajo skladnost z zahtevami glede varstva podatkov in pravicami posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, tudi pravico do učinkovitega upravnega ali sodnega varstva.
Eurojust should be able to take into account cooperation agreements concluded between Eurojust and third countries which allow for the exchange of personal data when carrying out the assessment of all the circumstances surrounding the data transfer.
Eurojust bi moral imeti možnost upoštevati sporazume o sodelovanju, ki so jih sklenili Eurojust in tretje države ter ki omogočajo izmenjavo osebnih podatkov pri ocenjevanju vseh okoliščin pri prenosu podatkov.
Eurojust should be able to also take into account the fact that the transfer of personal data will be subject to confidentiality obligations and the principle of specificity, ensuring that the data will not be processed for other purposes than for the purposes of the transfer.
Prav tako bi moral imeti možnost upoštevati dejstvo, da bodo za prenos osebnih podatkov veljale obveznosti glede zaupnosti in načelo specifičnosti, ki zagotavljajo, da se podatki ne obdelujejo za druge namene kot za namen prenosa.
In addition, Eurojust should take into account that the personal data will not be used to request, hand down or execute a death penalty or any form of cruel and inhuman treatment.
Poleg tega pa bi moral tudi upoštevati, da se osebni podatki ne bodo uporabljali za zahtevo smrtne kazni, njen izrek ali njeno izvršitev ali kakršno koli obliko krutega in nečloveškega ravnanja.
While those conditions could be considered to be appropriate safeguards allowing the transfer of data, Eurojust should be able to require additional safeguards.
Čeprav bi se ti pogoji lahko šteli za ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe za prenos podatkov, bi moral imeti Eurojust možnost zahtevati dodatne zaščitne ukrepe.
Where no adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards exist, a transfer or a category of transfers could take place only in specific situations, if necessary to protect the vital interests of the data subject or another person, or to safeguard legitimate interests of the data subject where the law of the Member State transferring the personal data so provides; for the prevention of an immediate and serious threat to the public security of a Member State or a third country; in an individual case for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security; or in an individual case for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims.
V primerih, ko ni sklepa o ustreznosti ali ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepov, bi se prenos ali skupina prenosov lahko izvedla le v specifičnih okoliščinah, če je to potrebno za zaščito življenjskih interesov posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ali druge osebe ali zaščito legitimnih interesov posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, kadar je to določeno v pravu države članice, ki prenaša osebne podatke, za preprečevanje neposredne in resne grožnje javni varnosti države članice ali tretje države, v posameznih primerih za namene preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanja kazenskih sankcij, vključno z varovanjem pred grožnjami javni varnosti in njihovim preprečevanjem, ali v posameznem primeru zaradi uveljavitve, izvajanja ali obrambe pravnih zahtevkov.
Those derogations should be interpreted restrictively and should not allow frequent, massive and structural transfers of personal data, or large-scale transfers of data, but should be limited to data strictly necessary.
Ta odstopanja bi bilo treba razlagati restriktivno in ne bi smela omogočati pogostih, množičnih in strukturnih prenosov osebnih podatkov, niti obsežnih prenosov podatkov, ampak bi morala biti omejena na podatke, ki so nujno potrebni.
Such transfers should be documented and should be made available to the EDPS on request in order to monitor the lawfulness of the transfer.
Te prenose bi bilo treba dokumentirati ter jih na zahtevo dati na voljo ENVP, da se lahko spremlja zakonitost prenosa.
In exceptional cases, Eurojust should be able to extend the deadlines for the storage of operational personal data in order to achieve its objectives, subject to observance of the purpose limitation principle applicable to processing of personal data in the context of all its activities.
V izjemnih primerih bi Eurojust moral imeti možnost, da za doseganje svojih ciljev podaljša roke hrambe operativnih osebnih podatkov, in sicer ob upoštevanju načela omejitve namena, ki se uporablja za obdelavo osebnih podatkov v okviru vseh njegovih dejavnosti.
Such decisions should be taken following careful consideration of all interests at stake, including those of the data subjects.
Takšne odločitve bi bilo treba sprejeti po pazljivi preučitvi vseh zadevnih interesov, tudi interesov posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.