natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since users increasingly rely on video-sharing platform services to access audiovisual content, it is necessary to ensure a sufficient level of consumer protection by aligning the rules on audiovisual commercial communications, to the appropriate extent, amongst all providers.
Ker se uporabniki vse bolj zanašajo na storitve platform za izmenjavo videov, da lahko dostopajo do avdiovizualnih vsebin, je treba v ustreznem obsegu zagotoviti ustrezno raven varstva potrošnikov z usklajevanjem pravil o avdiovizualnih komercialnih sporočilih med vsemi ponudniki.
It is therefore important that audiovisual commercial communications on video-sharing platforms are clearly identified and respect a set of minimum qualitative requirements.
Zato je pomembno, da so avdiovizualna komercialna sporočila na platformah za izmenjavo videov jasno opredeljena in da spoštujejo niz minimalnih zahtev za kakovost.
A significant share of the content provided on video-sharing platform services is not under the editorial responsibility of the video-sharing platform provider.
Ponudnik platforme za izmenjavo videov za znaten delež vsebine, ponujene s storitvami platform za izmenjavo videov, nima uredniške odgovornosti.
However, those providers typically determine the organisation of the content, namely programmes, user-generated videos and audiovisual commercial communications, including by automatic means or algorithms.
Vendar ti ponudniki običajno določajo organizacijo vsebine, in sicer programov in videov, ki jih ustvarijo uporabniki, ter avdiovizualnih komercialnih sporočil, vključno s samodejnimi orodji ali algoritmi.
Therefore, those providers should be required to take appropriate measures to protect minors from content that may impair their physical, mental or moral development.
Zato bi ti ponudniki morali sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za zaščito mladoletnikov pred vsebino, ki bi lahko ogrozila njihov telesni, duševni ali moralni razvoj.
They should also be required to take appropriate measures to protect the general public from content that contains incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group or a member of a group on any of the grounds referred to in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’), or the dissemination of which constitutes a criminal offence under Union law.
Ti ponudniki bi prav tako morali sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za zaščito splošne javnosti pred vsebino, ki spodbuja nasilje ali sovraštvo, usmerjeno proti skupini oseb ali članu take skupine, na kateri koli podlagi iz člena 21 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina), ali katere razširjanje je kaznivo dejanje po pravu Unije.
In light of the nature of the providers' involvement with the content provided on video-sharing platform services, the appropriate measures to protect minors and the general public should relate to the organisation of the content and not to the content as such.
Glede na naravo vključenosti ponudnikov v vsebino, ponujene s storitvami platform za izmenjavo videov, bi ustrezni ukrepi za zaščito mladoletnikov in splošne javnosti morali biti povezani z organizacijo vsebine, ne pa s samo vsebino.
The requirements in this regard as set out in Directive 2010/13/EU should therefore apply without prejudice to Articles 12 to 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC, which provide for an exemption from liability for illegal information transmitted, or automatically, intermediately and temporarily stored, or stored by certain providers of information society services.
Zahteve v zvezi s tem, kot so določene v Direktivi 2010/13/EU, bi se torej morale uporabljati brez poseganja v člene 12 do 14 Direktive 2000/31/ES, ki določa izjemo od odgovornosti za nezakonite podatke, ki se prenašajo ali samodejno, vmesno in začasno shranijo ali ki jih shranjujejo določeni ponudniki storitev informacijske družbe.
When providing services covered by Articles 12 to 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC, those requirements should also apply without prejudice to Article 15 of that Directive, which precludes general obligations to monitor such information and to actively seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity from being imposed on those providers, without however concerning monitoring obligations in specific cases and, in particular, without affecting orders by national authorities in accordance with national law.
Pri zagotavljanju storitev iz členov 12 do 14 Direktive 2000/31/ES bi bilo treba te zahteve uporabljati tudi brez poseganja v člen 15 navedene direktive, ki izključuje nalaganje splošnih obveznosti za nadzor nad takimi podatki in za dejavno raziskovanje dejstev ali okoliščin, na podlagi katerih se domneva, da gre za nezakonito dejavnost, tem ponudnikom, kar pa ne zadeva obveznosti nadzora v posebnih primerih in predvsem ne vpliva na odločitve nacionalnih organov v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
It is appropriate to involve video-sharing platform providers as much as possible when implementing the appropriate measures to be taken pursuant to Directive 2010/13/EU.
Pri izvajanju ustreznih ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z Direktivo 2010/13/EU, je primerno v čim večji meri vključiti ponudnike platform za izmenjavo videov.
Co-regulation should therefore be encouraged.
Spodbujati bi torej bilo treba koregulacijo.
It should also remain possible for video-sharing platform providers to take stricter measures on a voluntary basis in accordance with Union law, respecting the freedom of expression and information and media pluralism.
Ponudniki platform za izmenjavo videov bi morali še naprej imeti možnost, da v skladu s pravom Unije in ob spoštovanju svobode izražanja, obveščanja in pluralnosti medijev prostovoljno sprejmejo strožje ukrepe.
The right to an effective remedy and the right to a fair trial are fundamental rights laid down in Article 47 of the Charter.
Pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in pravica do poštenega sojenja sta temeljni pravici, določeni v členu 47 Listine.
The provisions of Directive 2010/13/EU should not, therefore, be construed in a way that would prevent parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system.
Določbe Direktive 2010/13/EU se zato ne bi smele razlagati na način, ki bi strankam preprečil uveljavljanje pravice dostopa do sodnega sistema.
When taking the appropriate measures to protect minors from harmful content and to protect the general public from content containing incitement to violence, hatred and terrorism in accordance with Directive 2010/13/EU, the applicable fundamental rights, as laid down in the Charter, should be carefully balanced.
Pri sprejemanju ustreznih ukrepov za zaščito mladoletnikov pred škodljivo vsebino in splošne javnosti pred vsebino, ki vsebuje spodbujanje nasilja, sovraštva oziroma terorizma, v skladu z Direktivo 2010/13/EU, bi bilo treba previdno najti ravnovesje med veljavnimi temeljnimi pravicami, kot so določene v Listini.
That concerns, in particular and as the case may be, the right to respect for private and family life and the protection of personal data, the freedom of expression and information, the freedom to conduct a business, the prohibition of discrimination and the rights of the child.
To predvsem zadeva, glede na primer, pravico do spoštovanja zasebnega in družinskega življenja, varstva osebnih podatkov, svobode izražanja in obveščanja, svobode gospodarske pobude, prepovedi diskriminacije in otrokovih pravic.
The Contact Committee aims at facilitating an effective implementation of Directive 2010/13/EU and should be regularly consulted on any practical problems arising from its application.
Odbor za stike si prizadeva za lajšanje učinkovitega izvajanja Direktive 2010/13EU in z njim bi se bilo treba redno posvetovati o vseh praktičnih težavah, izhajajočih iz njene uporabe.
The work of the Contact Committee should not be limited to the existing audiovisual policy issues, but should also cover the relevant developments arising in this sector.
Delo odbora za stike ne bi smelo biti omejeno na obstoječa vprašanja v zvezi z avdiovizualno politiko, temveč bi moralo zajemati tudi zadevni razvoj v tem sektorju.
It is composed of representatives of the relevant national authorities of the Member States.
Odbor sestavljajo predstavniki ustreznih nacionalnih organov držav članic.
When appointing their representatives, Member States are encouraged to promote gender parity in the composition of the Contact Committee.
Države članice se spodbuja, da pri imenovanju svojih predstavnikov prispevajo k enaki zastopanosti spolov v odboru za stike.
Member States should ensure that their national regulatory authorities or bodies are legally distinct from the government.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da so njihovi nacionalni regulatorni organi ali telesa pravno ločeni od vlade.
However, this should not preclude Member States from exercising supervision in accordance with their national constitutional law.
Vendar pa to državam članicam ne bi smelo preprečevati, da izvajajo nadzor v skladu z nacionalnim ustavnim pravom.
National regulatory authorities or bodies should be considered to have achieved the requisite degree of independence if those authorities or bodies, including those that are constituted as public authorities or bodies, are functionally and effectively independent of their respective governments and of any other public or private body.
Za nacionalne regulatorne organe ali telesa, vključno s tistimi, ki so bili ustanovljeni kot javni organi ali telesa, bi bilo treba šteti, da so dosegli potrebno stopnjo neodvisnosti, če so funkcionalno in dejansko neodvisni od svojih vlad in vseh drugih javnih ali zasebnih organov.
That is considered essential to ensure the impartiality of decisions taken by a national regulatory authority or body.
To je bistveno za zagotovitev nepristranskosti odločitev, ki jih sprejme nacionalni regulatorni organ ali telo.
The requirement of independence should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to establish regulatory authorities that have oversight over different sectors, such as the audiovisual and telecommunications sectors.
Ta zahteva po neodvisnosti ne bi smela posegati v možnost držav članic, da ustanovijo regulatorne organe, ki nadzirajo različne sektorje, na primer avdiovizualni in telekomunikacijski sektor.
National regulatory authorities or bodies should have the enforcement powers and resources necessary for the fulfilment of their tasks, in terms of staffing, expertise and financial means.
Nacionalni regulatorni organi ali telesa bi morali imeti potrebna izvršilna pooblastila in vire za opravljanje svojih nalog, v smislu osebja, strokovnega znanja in finančnih sredstev.
The activities of national regulatory authorities or bodies established under Directive 2010/13/EU should ensure respect for the objectives of media pluralism, cultural diversity, consumer protection, the proper functioning of the internal market and the promotion of fair competition.
Dejavnosti nacionalnih regulatornih organov ali teles, ustanovljenih na podlagi Direktive 2010/13/EU, bi morale zagotoviti upoštevanje ciljev v zvezi s pluralnostjo medijev, kulturno raznolikostjo, varstvom potrošnikov, pravilnim delovanjem notranjega trga in spodbujanjem poštene konkurence.
As one of the purposes of audiovisual media services is to serve the interests of individuals and shape public opinion, it is essential that such services are able to inform individuals and society as completely as possible and with the highest level of variety.
Ker je eden od namenov avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev služiti interesom posameznikov in oblikovati javno mnenje, je nujno, da take storitve lahko obveščajo posameznike in družbo na čim bolj celovit in raznolik način.
That purpose can only be achieved if editorial decisions remain free from any state interference or influence by national regulatory authorities or bodies that goes beyond the mere implementation of law and which does not serve to safeguard a legally protected right which is to be protected regardless of a particular opinion.
Ta namen se lahko doseže le, če se uredniške odločitve lahko ubranijo pred vmešavanjem ali vplivanjem nacionalnih regulatornih organov ali teles, ki presega izvajanje zakona in ne služi varovanju zakonsko zaščitene pravice, ki jo je treba zaščititi ne glede na posamezna mnenja.
Effective appeal mechanisms should exist at national level.
Na nacionalni ravni bi morali obstajati učinkoviti pritožbeni mehanizmi.
The relevant appeal body should be independent from the parties involved.
Zadevni pritožbeni organ bi moral biti neodvisen od udeleženih strani.
Such body may be a court.
Ta organ je lahko sodišče.
The appeal procedure should be without prejudice to the division of competences within national judicial systems.
Postopek pritožbe ne bi smel posegati v delitev pristojnosti znotraj nacionalnih pravosodnih sistemov.
ERGA's role is to provide technical expertise to the Commission in its work to ensure a consistent implementation of Directive 2010/13/EU in all Member States and to facilitate cooperation among the national regulatory authorities or bodies, and between the national regulatory authorities or bodies and the Commission.
Zaradi tega bi bilo treba v Direktivi 2010/13/EU uradno priznati in okrepiti njeno vlogo.
ERGA has made a positive contribution to consistent regulatory practice and has provided high-level advice to the Commission on implementation matters.
Skupino ERGA bi torej bilo treba ustanoviti z navedeno direktivo.
This calls for the formal recognition and reinforcement of its role in Directive 2010/13/EU.
Komisija bi morala imeti možnost posvetovanja s skupino ERGA o kateri koli zadevi v zvezi z avdiovizualnimi medijskimi storitvami in platformami za izmenjavo videov.
ERGA should therefore be established by virtue of that Directive.
Skupina ERGA bi morala Komisiji pomagati s tehničnim znanjem in svetovanjem ter omogočanjem izmenjave najboljših praks, tudi glede pravil ravnanja za samoregulacijo in koregulacijo.
The Commission should be free to consult ERGA on any matter relating to audiovisual media services and video-sharing platforms.
Komisija bi se morala s skupino ERGA posvetovati zlasti pri uporabi Direktive 2010/13/EU, da bi jo bilo lažje usklajeno izvajati.
ERGA should assist the Commission by providing technical expertise and advice and by facilitating the exchange of best practices, including on self- and co-regulatory codes of conduct.
Skupina ERGA bi morala na zahtevo Komisije dati nezavezujoča mnenja o pristojnosti, ukrepih, ki odstopajo od načela svobodnega sprejemanja, in ukrepih proti izogibanju pristojnosti.
In particular, the Commission should consult ERGA in the application of Directive 2010/13/EU with a view to facilitating its convergent implementation.
Skupina ERGA bi morala biti sposobna tehnično svetovati o vseh regulativnih zadevah v zvezi z okvirom za avdiovizualne medijske storitve, med drugim na področju sovražnega govora in varstva mladoletnikov, ter o vsebini avdiovizualnih komercialnih sporočil za hrano z visoko vsebnostjo maščob, soli ali natrija in sladkorja.
Upon the Commission's request, ERGA should provide non-binding opinions on jurisdiction, on measures derogating from freedom of reception and on measures addressing the circumvention of jurisdiction.
Medijska pismenost pomeni spretnosti, znanje in razumevanje, ki državljanom omogočajo učinkovito in varno uporabo medijev.
ERGA should also be able to provide technical advice on any regulatory matter related to the audiovisual media services framework, including in the area of hate speech and the protection of minors, as well as on the content of audiovisual commercial communications for foods high in fat, salt or sodium and sugars.
Da bi lahko državljani dostopali do informacij ter na odgovoren in varen način uporabljali, kritično ocenjevali in ustvarjali medijsko vsebino, morajo imeti visoko stopnjo medijske pismenosti.
‘Media literacy’ refers to skills, knowledge and understanding that allow citizens to use media effectively and safely.
Medijska pismenost ne bi smela biti omejena le na učenje o orodjih in tehnologijah, temveč bi morala biti namenjena temu, da državljanom zagotovi spretnosti kritičnega razmišljanja, ki ga potrebujejo, da bi lahko ustrezno presojali, analizirali zapletene realnosti ter razlikovali med mnenji in dejstvi.
In order to enable citizens to access information and to use, critically assess and create media content responsibly and safely, citizens need to possess advanced media literacy skills.
Zato je potrebno, da ponudniki medijskih storitev in ponudniki platform za izmenjavo videov, v sodelovanju z vsemi zadevnimi deležniki, promovirajo razvoj medijske pismenosti v vseh družbenih plasteh, za državljane vseh starosti in vse medije ter da se pozorno spremlja napredek na tem področju.
Media literacy should not be limited to learning about tools and technologies, but should aim to equip citizens with the critical thinking skills required to exercise judgment, analyse complex realities and recognise the difference between opinion and fact.
Direktiva 2010/13/EU ne posega v obveznost držav članic spoštovati in varovati človekovo dostojanstvo.
It is therefore necessary that both media service providers and video-sharing platforms providers, in cooperation with all relevant stakeholders, promote the development of media literacy in all sections of society, for citizens of all ages, and for all media and that progress in that regard is followed closely.
Spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki so priznana zlasti z Listino.
Directive 2010/13/EU is without prejudice to the obligation of the Member States to respect and protect human dignity.
Direktiva 2010/13/EU si zlasti prizadeva, da bi zagotovila polno spoštovanje pravice do svobode izražanja, pravice do svobode gospodarske pobude in pravice do sodnega varstva ter da bi spodbudila uporabo otrokovih pravic, ki so vključene v Listino.
It respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised, in particular, by the Charter.
Vsak ukrep, ki ga sprejmejo države članice na podlagi Direktive 2010/13/EU, mora spoštovati svobodo izražanja in obveščanja ter pluralnost medijev, pa tudi kulturno in jezikovno raznolikost v skladu z Unescovo Konvencijo o varovanju in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnih izrazov.
In particular, Directive 2010/13/EU seeks to ensure full respect for the right to freedom of expression, the freedom to conduct a business, the right to judicial review and to promote the application of the rights of the child enshrined in the Charter.
Pravica dostopa do političnih informativnih programov je ključnega pomena, da se zaščiti temeljna svoboščina sprejemanja informacij in zagotovi, da so interesi gledalcev v Uniji povsem in ustrezno zaščiteni.
Any measure taken by Member States under Directive 2010/13/EU is to respect the freedom of expression and information and media pluralism, as well as cultural and linguistic diversity, in accordance with the Unesco Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions.
Ker avdiovizualne medijske storitve postajajo vedno pomembnejše za družbe in demokracijo, bi bilo treba v čim večjem obsegu zagotoviti oddajanje političnih novic čezmejno v Uniji, brez poseganja v pravila o avtorskih pravicah.
The right to access political news programmes is crucial to safeguard the fundamental freedom to receive information and to ensure that the interests of viewers in the Union are fully and properly protected.
Direktiva 2010/13/EU ne zadeva pravil mednarodnega zasebnega prava, zlasti pravil o pristojnosti sodišč in prava, ki se uporablja za pogodbene in nepogodbene obveznosti.
Given the ever-growing importance of audiovisual media services for societies and democracy, broadcasts of political news should, to the greatest extent possible, and without prejudice to copyright rules, be made available cross-border in the Union.
V skladu s Skupno politično izjavo z dne 28. septembra 2011 držav članic in Komisije o obrazložitvenih dokumentih se države članice zavezujejo, da bodo v upravičenih primerih obvestilu o ukrepih za prenos priložile enega ali več dokumentov, v katerih se pojasni razmerje med elementi direktive in ustreznimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
Directive 2010/13/EU does not concern rules of private international law, in particular rules governing the jurisdiction of the courts and the law applicable to contractual and non-contractual obligations.
Zakonodajalec meni, da je posredovanje takih dokumentov v primeru te direktive upravičeno.
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents, Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures by one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
Direktivo 2010/13/EU bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Directive 2010/13/EU should therefore be amended accordingly,
Člen 1
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Direktiva 2010/13/EU se spremeni:
Article 1
v členu 1 se odstavek 1 spremeni:
Directive 2010/13/EU is amended as follows:
točka (a) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
In Article 1, paragraph 1 is amended as follows:
‚avdiovizualna medijska storitev‘ pomeni:
point (a) is replaced by the following:
storitev, kakor je opredeljena v členih 56 in 57 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, kadar je glavni namen storitve ali ločljivega dela te storitve zagotavljanje programov, pod uredniško odgovornostjo ponudnika medijskih storitev, splošni javnosti za obveščanje, zabavo ali izobraževanje preko elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij v smislu točke (a) člena 2 Direktive 2002/21/ES; tovrstna avdiovizualna medijska storitev je bodisi razširjanje televizijskih programov, kakor je opredeljeno v točki (e) tega odstavka, bodisi avdiovizualna medijska storitev na zahtevo, kakor je opredeljena v točki (g) tega odstavka;
“audiovisual media service” means:
avdiovizualno komercialno sporočilo;“
a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, where the principal purpose of the service or a dissociable section thereof is devoted to providing programmes, under the editorial responsibility of a media service provider, to the general public, in order to inform, entertain or educate, by means of electronic communications networks within the meaning of point (a) of Article 2 of Directive 2002/21/EC; such an audiovisual media service is either a television broadcast as defined in point (e) of this paragraph or an on-demand audiovisual media service as defined in point (g) of this paragraph;
vstavi se naslednja točka:
audiovisual commercial communication;’;
‚storitev platforme za izmenjavo videov‘ pomeni storitev, kakor je opredeljena v členih 56 in 57 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, kadar je glavni namen storitve ali ločljivega dela te storitve ali bistvena funkcija storitve zagotavljanje programov, videov, ki jih ustvarijo uporabniki, ali obojega splošni javnosti, za katere ponudnik platforme za izmenjavo videov nima uredniške odgovornosti, in sicer za obveščanje, zabavo ali izobraževanje preko elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij v smislu točke (a) člena 2 Direktive 2002/21/ES ter katerih organiziranje določa ponudnik platforme za izmenjavo videov, med drugim s samodejnimi orodji ali algoritmi, zlasti s prikazovanjem, označevanjem in določanjem zaporedja;“
the following point is inserted:
točka (b) se nadomesti z naslednjim: