natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To the increase of the standard fee under points (a) and (b) of paragraph 3 may be added EUR 2 for the accounting year 2018 and EUR 5 from the accounting year 2019 where the accountancy data has been verified by the Commission in accordance with point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 13 of this Regulation and is deemed duly completed in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009, either at the moment of its submission to the Commission, or within 40 working days from the date on which the Commission informed the submitting Member State that the submitted accountancy data is not duly completed.
Zvišanemu standardnemu plačilu iz točk (a) in (b) odstavka 3 se lahko dodata zneska 2 EUR za obračunsko leto 2018 in 5 EUR od obračunskega leta 2019 dalje, če računovodske podatke preveri Komisija v skladu s točko (b) prvega odstavka člena 13 te uredbe in jih šteje za ustrezno izpolnjene v skladu s členom 8(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1217/2009, bodisi ob predložitvi Komisiji bodisi v 40 delovnih dneh od datuma, ko Komisija obvesti državo članico, ki je predložila računovodske podatke, da predloženi podatki niso ustrezno izpolnjeni.
In exceptional and duly justified cases, the Commission may decide to extend that period of 40 working days.
Komisija se lahko v izjemnih in ustrezno utemeljenih primerih odloči navedeno obdobje 40 delovnih dni podaljšati.
The end date of the period of 40 working days, or of any extension thereof, shall be confirmed in writing between the Commission and the liaison agency of the Member State concerned.’.
Iztek navedenega obdobja 40 delovnih dni ali kakršnega koli podaljšanja tega obdobja se pisno potrdi med Komisijo in organom za zvezo zadevne države članice.“
It shall apply from the accounting year 2018.
Uporablja se od obračunskega leta 2018.
OJ L 328, 15.12.2009, p. 27.
UL L 328, 15.12.2009, str. 27.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/220 of 3 February 2015 laying down rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Union (OJ L 46, 19.2.2015, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/220 z dne 3. februarja 2015 o določitvi pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1217/2009 o vzpostavitvi mreže za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov o dohodkih in poslovanju kmetijskih gospodarstev v Evropski uniji (UL L 46, 19.2.2015, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1795
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/1795
laying down procedure and criteria for the application of the economic equilibrium test pursuant to Article 11 of Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
o določitvi postopka in meril za uporabo preskusa ekonomskega ravnovesja v skladu s členom 11 Direktive 2012/34/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area, and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 11(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2012/34/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. novembra 2012 o vzpostavitvi enotnega evropskega železniškega območja in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 11(4) Direktive,
Directive 2012/34/EU as amended by Directive (EU) 2016/2370 has opened up the market for domestic rail passenger services with a view to completing the single European railway area.
Direktiva 2012/34/EU, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo (EU) 2016/2370, je odprla trg notranjih storitev železniškega potniškega prometa, da se dokonča enotni evropski železniški prostor.
This may have implications for the organisation and financing of rail passenger services provided under a public service contract.
To lahko vpliva na organiziranje in financiranje storitev železniškega potniškega prometa, ki se opravljajo na podlagi pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Member States may introduce in their legislation the possibility to deny access to the infrastructure where the economic equilibrium of such public service contracts would be compromised by new open access rail passenger services.
Države članice lahko v svoji zakonodaji uvedejo možnost, da zavrnejo dostop do infrastrukture, kadar bi odprt dostop novih storitev železniškega potniškega prometa ogrozil ekonomsko ravnovesje takih pogodb o izvajanju javne službe.
On the other hand, such services, depending on their specific features, such as quality characteristics, timing, destinations served and prospective customers targeted, may not be in head-on competition with public services, and thus cause only limited impact on the economic equilibrium of a public service contract.
Po drugi strani take storitve, ki so odvisne od posebnih značilnosti, kot so kakovost, čas, namembni kraji in potencialne ciljne stranke, javnim službam ne konkurirajo nujno neposredno, zato imajo le omejen učinek na ekonomsko ravnovesje pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Furthermore, there may be positive network effects for public service operators, net benefits to passengers or wider social benefits that should be taken into account.
Poleg tega lahko prinesejo pozitivne učinke na omrežje za izvajalce javne službe, neto koristi za potnike ali širše družbene koristi, ki bi jih bilo treba upoštevati.
It is therefore necessary to balance the legitimate interests of operators performing a public service contract and competent authorities, on the one hand, with the overarching objectives of completing the single European railway area and reaping its wider social benefits, on the other hand.
Zato je treba legitimne interese izvajalcev, ki izvajajo pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe, in pristojnih organov uravnotežiti tako s krovnimi cilji dokončanja enotnega evropskega železniškega prostora kot tudi z zagotavljanjem širših družbenih koristi.
The economic equilibrium test should achieve a balance between those competing interests.
Preskus ekonomskega ravnovesja bi moral uravnotežiti navedene nasprotujoče si interese.
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council lays down that, as a reward for discharging public service obligations in the provision of rail passenger services, operators may be granted financial compensation or exclusive rights, or both.
Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta določa, da se lahko izvajalcem kot nagrada za izvajanje obveznosti opravljanja železniških potniških storitev dodeli finančno nadomestilo ali izključne pravice ali oboje.
However, the grant of exclusive rights to railway operators should not result in the foreclosure of domestic rail passenger markets.
Vendar pa dodelitev izključnih pravic prevoznikom v železniškem prometu ne bi smela omejiti dostopa do trgov notranjih storitev železniškega potniškega prometa.
Such exclusive rights should not preclude the right of access of other railway undertakings, unless the economic equilibrium test shows that, taking into account the value of the exclusive rights, the new rail passenger service would have a substantial negative impact on the profitability of services operated under the public service contract or the net cost of their provision for the competent authority, or both, depending on risk-sharing arrangements stipulated in the public service contract.
Take izključne pravice ne bi smele preprečiti pravice dostopa drugim prevoznikom v železniškem prometu, razen če preskus ekonomskega ravnovesja pokaže, da bi nova storitev železniškega potniškega prometa ob upoštevanju vrednosti izključnih pravic bistveno negativno vplivala na dobičkonosnost storitev, ki se opravljajo na podlagi pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe, ali na neto strošek njihovega izvajanja za pristojni organ ali oboje, odvisno od dogovorov o delitvi tveganja, določenih v pogodbi o izvajanju javne službe.
An economic equilibrium test should be requested only in respect of passenger rail services which are not provided under a public service contract and which are either entirely new or entail a substantial modification of an existing service.
Preskus ekonomskega ravnovesja bi se moral zahtevati le za storitve železniškega potniškega prometa, ki se ne zagotavljajo na podlagi pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe in so bodisi popolnoma nove ali pomenijo bistveno spremembo obstoječe storitve.
This notion encompasses also commercial services provided by the same operator that carries out the public service contract.
Ta pojem zajema tudi komercialne storitve, ki jih opravlja isti izvajalec, ki izvaja pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe.
It should be for the regulatory body to assess whether a proposed modification of a rail passenger service should be considered substantial.
Ali bi bilo treba predlagano spremembo storitve železniškega potniškega prometa šteti za bistveno, bi moral oceniti regulatorni organ.
An increase in frequencies or number of stops could be considered a substantial modification.
Povečanje pogostosti ali števila postankov bi se lahko štelo za bistveno spremembo.
A variation in prices should not be considered a substantial modification, unless it is inconsistent with normal market behaviour, and where relevant, with the business plan submitted to the regulatory body at the time the previous economic equilibrium test was carried out.
Razlika v cenah se ne bi smela šteti za bistveno spremembo, razen če ni v skladu z običajnim tržnim ravnanjem ter, kadar je ustrezno, s poslovnim načrtom, predloženim regulatornemu organu v času, ko je bil opravljen prejšnji preskus ekonomskega ravnovesja.
The regulatory body's decision should include an assessment of net benefits to customers arising from the new rail passenger service in the short and medium term, and should take into account the technical information provided by the infrastructure manager on relevant infrastructure requirements and on expected impacts on network performance and on optimal capacity utilisation by all applicants.
Sklep regulatornega organa bi moral vključevati oceno neto koristi za stranke, ki izhajajo iz nove storitve železniškega potniškega prometa v kratkoročnem in srednjeročnem obdobju, ter upoštevati tehnične informacije, ki jih upravljavec infrastrukture zagotovi v zvezi z ustreznimi infrastrukturnimi zahtevami, in pričakovane učinke na delovanje omrežja in optimalno izkoriščenost zmogljivosti s strani vseh prosilcev.
The regulatory body should be entitled both to assess the likely impact of the new passenger service, and to assess whether such impact would be substantial and thus compromise the economic equilibrium of the existing public service contract.
Regulatorni organ bi moral imeti pravico, da oceni verjetni učinek nove storitve potniškega prometa in oceni, ali bi bil takšen učinek bistven ter ali bi tako ogrozil ekonomsko ravnotežje obstoječe pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
In order to avoid the interruption of a new rail passenger service that has already started, and to give legal certainty to this new service about its possibility to operate, the period during which an economic equilibrium test can be requested should be limited and linked to the time of the applicant's notification of its interest in operating a new rail passenger service.
Da bi se izognili prekinitvi delovanja že začete nove storitve železniškega potniškega prometa in da bila za to novo storitev zagotovljena pravna varnost v zvezi z možnostjo njenega delovanja, bi bilo treba obdobje, v katerem je mogoče zahtevati preskus ekonomskega ravnovesja, omejiti in vezati na datum predložitve uradnega obvestila prosilca o interesu za opravljanje nove storitve železniškega potniškega prometa.
To be admissible, a request for an economic equilibrium test should include substantiation that the economic equilibrium of the public service contract would be compromised by the proposed new service.
Da bi bila prošnja za preskus ekonomskega ravnovesja ustrezna, bi morala vsebovati utemeljitev, da bi predlagana nova storitev ogrozila ekonomsko ravnovesje pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
In order to ensure legal certainty for all parties involved and to enable the infrastructure manager to process requests for capacity according to the procedure set out in Section 3 of Chapter IV of Directive 2012/34/EU, the regulatory body should take a decision on economic equilibrium within a pre-determined time frame, and in any event before the deadline for receipt of requests of capacity, set by the infrastructure manager in accordance with point 3 of Annex VII to Directive 2012/34/EU.
Da se vsem udeleženim stranem zagotovi pravna varnost in upravljavcu infrastrukture omogoči, da obdela prošnje za dodelitev zmogljivosti v skladu s postopkom iz oddelka 3 poglavja IV Direktive 2012/34/EU, bi moral regulatorni organ sprejeti odločitev o ekonomskem ravnovesju v vnaprej določenem časovnem okviru, v vsakem primeru pa pred rokom za prejem prošenj za dodelitev zmogljivosti, ki ga določi upravljavec infrastrukture v skladu s točko 3 Priloge VII k Direktivi 2012/34/EU.
However, if at the time the applicant's notification is received, a public service contract is in the process of being competitively tendered and an economic equilibrium test has been requested, the regulatory body may decide to suspend consideration of the application for the new rail passenger service for a limited period of time pending the award of the new public service contract.
Vendar če je v času prejema uradnega obvestila prosilca pogodba o izvajanju javne službe v konkurenčnem razpisnem postopku in je bil zaprošen preskus ekonomskega ravnovesja, se lahko regulatorni organ odloči, da začasno ustavi obravnavo vloge za novo storitev železniškega potniškega prometa za časovno obdobje do dodelitve nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
The suspension should last for no longer than 12 months from the receipt of the applicant's notification or until the tender process has concluded, whichever is sooner.
Začasna ustavitev bi morala trajati največ 12 mesecev od prejema uradnega obvestila prosilca ali do zaključka razpisnega postopka, kar koli je prej.
These specific provisions are without prejudice to the application of this regulation to a public service contract which is on-going at the time the applicant's notification is received.
Te posebne določbe ne posegajo v uporabo te uredbe za pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe, ki se izvaja v času prejema uradnega obvestila prosilca.
In these circumstances, and where the economic equilibrium test on the existing public service contract demonstrates that access can be granted, such access should be time-limited until the expiry of the existing public service contract.
V teh okoliščinah in kadar preskus ekonomskega ravnovesja za obstoječo pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe pokaže, da se dostop lahko odobri, bi moral biti tak dostop časovno omejen do prenehanja obstoječe pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
The economic equilibrium of a public service contract should be regarded as compromised if the proposed new service would have a substantial negative impact on the level of profit for the public service operator and/or their operation would imply a substantial increase in net cost for the competent authority.
Ekonomsko ravnovesje pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe bi se moralo šteti za ogroženo, če bi predlagana nova storitev bistveno negativno učinkovala na raven dobička izvajalca javne službe in/ali bi njeno delovanje pomenilo bistveno povečanje neto stroškov za pristojni organ.
When assessing whether an impact is substantial, the regulatory body should take into account criteria such as whether the new service would jeopardise the viability and endanger the continuity of the public service, either because performance of the public contract would not be economically sustainable for the public service operator, or because it would entail a substantial increase in net cost for the competent authority.
Regulatorni organ bi moral pri ocenjevanju, ali je učinek bistven, upoštevati merila, kot je, ali bi nova storitev ogrozila izvedljivost in kontinuiteto javne službe, ker izvajanje pogodbe ne bi bilo ekonomsko vzdržno za izvajalca javne službe ali ker bi to pomenilo bistveno povišanje neto stroškov pristojnega organa.
Beyond the economic analysis, the regulatory body should also assess and take into account the net benefits to customers in the short and medium term and any impacts in network performance and capacity use.
Poleg ekonomske analize bi moral regulatorni organ oceniti in upoštevati tudi kratkoročne in dolgoročne neto koristi za stranke ter kakršne koli učinke na delovanje omrežja in uporabo zmogljivosti.
The regulatory body should take into account the technical information provided by the infrastructure manager on relevant infrastructure requirements, on expected impacts on network performance and on optimal capacity utilisation by all applicants.
Regulatorni organ bi moral upoštevati tehnične informacije, ki jih je predložil upravljavec infrastrukture v zvezi z ustreznimi infrastrukturnimi zahtevami, o pričakovanih učinkih na delovanje omrežja in optimalno izkoriščenost zmogljivosti s strani vseh prosilcev.
The economic analysis should focus on the impact of the proposed new service on the public service contract as a whole, including the services specifically affected, for its entire time-scale, taking into account the value of any existing exclusive rights that may have been granted.
Ekonomska analiza bi se morala osredotočiti na učinek predlagane nove storitve na pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe kot celoto, vključno s storitvami, ki jih še posebej zadeva, in sicer v celotnem časovnem obdobju ob upoštevanju vrednosti vseh obstoječih izključnih pravic, ki so bile odobrene.
No predefined quantified threshold regarding the damage should be applied strictly or in isolation, and no such thresholds should be set in national legislation.
Noben vnaprej določen količinsko opredeljen prag v zvezi s škodo se ne bi smel uporabljati strogo ali ločeno niti taki pragovi ne bi smeli biti določeni v nacionalni zakonodaji.
The assessment should be based on an objective methodology adopted by the regulatory body having regard to the specificities of rail transport in the Member State concerned.
Ocena bi morala temeljiti na objektivni metodologiji, ki jo sprejme regulatorni organ ob upoštevanju posebnosti železniškega prometa v zadevni državi članici.
When the regulatory body comes to the conclusion that the new rail passenger service would compromise the economic equilibrium of the public service contract, in its decision it should indicate, if relevant, possible changes to the new rail passenger service which would enable access to be granted.
Kadar regulatorni organ ugotovi, da bi nova storitev železniškega potniškega prometa ogrozila ekonomsko ravnovesje pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe, bi moral v svoji odločitvi navesti, če je ustrezno, možne spremembe nove storitve železniškega potniškega prometa, ki bi omogočile odobritev dostopa.
The regulatory body may issue recommendations to the competent authority as regards other possible conditions that would enable access to be granted, in particular in the light of its analysis of net benefits to customers arising from the new rail passenger service.
Regulatorni organ lahko pristojnemu organu izda priporočila v zvezi z drugimi mogočimi pogoji, ki bi omogočili odobritev dostopa, zlasti glede na svojo analizo neto koristi za stranke zaradi nove storitve železniškega potniškega prometa.
If the application for access concerns a new rail passenger service as defined in Article 3(36) of Directive 2012/34/EU and the objective economic analysis of the regulatory body shows that the new passenger service would have a substantial negative impact on the economic equilibrium of a public service contract, the regulatory body should determine conditions which would enable access to be granted in accordance with Article 11a of Directive 2012/34/EU.
Če prošnja za dostop zadeva novo storitev železniškega potniškega prometa, kot je opredeljena v členu 3(36) Direktive 2012/34/EU in bi po objektivni ekonomski analizi regulatornega organa nova storitev potniškega prometa bistveno negativno učinkovala na ekonomsko ravnovesje pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe, bi moral regulatorni organ določiti pogoje, ki bi omogočili odobritev dostopa v skladu s členom 11a Direktive 2012/34/EU.
In all its activities related to the economic equilibrium test, the regulatory body should not disclose confidential or commercially sensitive information received from the parties.
Regulatorni organ pri nobenih svojih dejavnostih, povezanih s preskusom ekonomskega ravnovesja, ne bi smel razkriti zaupnih ali poslovno občutljivih informacij, prejetih od zadevnih strani.
In particular, it should redact such information from the decision to be published.
Zlasti bi moral prikriti take informacije v odločitvi, ki se objavi.
All decisions of regulatory bodies, including those on the confidential nature of the information received, are subject to judicial review according to Article 56(10) of Directive 2012/34/EU.
Vse odločitve regulatornega organa, vključno z odločitvami o zaupnosti prejetih informacij, so predmet sodnega nadzora v skladu s členom 56(10) Direktive 2012/34/EU.
Where the economic equilibrium test is carried out in respect of a new international passenger service, without prejudice to the principle of independence of regulatory bodies in decision-making referred to in Article 55(1) of Directive 2012/34/EU, the regulatory bodies concerned should exchange information and cooperate to achieve a reasonable resolution of the matter.
Kadar se preskus ekonomskega ravnovesja izvede za novo storitev mednarodnega potniškega prometa, bi si morali zadevni regulatorni organi brez poseganja v načelo neodvisnosti regulatornih organov pri odločanju iz člena 55(1) Direktive 2012/34/EU izmenjevati informacije in sodelovati za razumno razrešitev zadeve.
Regulatory bodies should exchange best practices in applying the economic equilibrium test with a view to adapting their methodology over time and developing a consistent methodology across Member States, which may be covered by Article 57(8) of Directive 2012/34/EU.
Regulatorni organi bi si morali izmenjevati dobre prakse pri uporabi preskusa ekonomskega ravnovesja, da bi sčasoma prilagodili in razvili usklajeno metodologijo v državah članicah, ki je lahko zajeta v členu 57(8) Direktive 2012/34/EU.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 869/2014 establishes criteria and procedures for the application of the principal purpose test and the economic equilibrium test in respect of new international rail passenger services.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 869/2014 določa merila in postopke za uporabo preskusa glavnega namena in ekonomskega ravnovesja v zvezi z novimi storitvami mednarodnega železniškega potniškega prometa.
However, with the opening of the market for domestic rail passenger services, the principal purpose test has become obsolete and the same criteria and procedures should apply to all new rail passenger services, regardless of whether they are domestic or international.
Vendar je zaradi odpiranja trga notranjih storitev železniškega potniškega prometa preskus glavnega namena zastarel in bi se morala enaka merila in postopki uporabljati za vse nove storitve železniškega potniškega prometa, ne glede na to, ali so notranje ali mednarodne.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 869/2014 should therefore be repealed.
Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 869/2014 bi bilo zato treba razveljaviti.
The application of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 869/2014 should be conditional on applicants' notifications being submitted within a time-frame that allows reasonable time for completion of the authorisation and scheduling process so that the services can actually start to run before 12 December 2020.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 62(1) of Directive 2012/34/EU,
Člen 1
Article 1
Ta uredba določa podrobnosti postopka in merila, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri ugotavljanju, ali bi nova storitev železniškega potniškega prometa ogrozila ekonomsko ravnovesje pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe v železniškem prometu.