natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In Article 42(1), the reference to ‘Articles 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18, 25, 28, 31 to 33, 41, 74 and 224’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Articles 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18, 25, 28, 31 to 33, 41, 56a and 224’.
V členu 42(1) se besedilo „členov 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18, 25, 28, od 31 do 33, 41, 74 in 224“ nadomesti z besedilom „členov 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18, 25, 28, od 31 do 33, 41, 56a in 224“.
After Article 56, a new section is inserted containing a new Article 56a:
Po členu 56 se vstavi nov oddelek, ki vsebuje nov člen 56a:
‘Section 2a
„Oddelek 2a
Communication with parties' representatives via e-Curia
Komuniciranje z zastopniki strank prek e-Curie
Article 56a
Člen 56a
Without prejudice to the cases referred to in Article 57(2), Article 72(4), Article 80(1), Article 105(1) and (2), Article 147(6), Article 148(9) and Article 178(2) and (3), all procedural documents shall be lodged and served via e-Curia.
Brez poseganja v primere iz členov 57(2), 72(4), 80(1), 105(1) in (2), 147(6), 148(9) in 178(2) in (3) se vsi procesni akti vlagajo in vročajo prek e-Curie.
The conditions for the lodging and service of procedural documents via e-Curia shall be specified in a decision adopted by the General Court.
Pogoji za vlaganje in vročanje procesnih aktov prek e-Curie se določijo v odločbi, ki jo sprejme Splošno sodišče.
Use of e-Curia shall require an access account to have been opened under the conditions laid down in the decision referred to in paragraph 2.
Pogoj za uporabo e-Curie je odprtje uporabniškega računa pod pogoji, določenimi v odločbi iz odstavka 2.
If a procedural document is lodged via e-Curia before the supporting documents required for validation of the access account have been produced, those supporting documents must be received in paper format at the Registry of the General Court within 10 days of the procedural document being lodged.
Če se procesni akt vloži prek e-Curie, še preden so predložena zahtevana dokazila za odobritev uporabniškega računa, je treba ta dokazila v sodnem tajništvu Splošnega sodišča vložiti v papirnati obliki v desetih dneh od vložitve akta.
This time limit may not be extended and Article 60 shall not apply.
Tega roka ni mogoče podaljšati in člen 60 se ne uporabi.
If the supporting documents are not received within the prescribed time limit, the Court shall declare the procedural document lodged via e-Curia to be inadmissible.
Če dokazila niso vložena v predpisanem roku, Splošno sodišče ugotovi nedopustnost procesnega akta, vloženega prek e-Curie.
Where the use of e-Curia is technically impossible and without prejudice to the application of the second paragraph of Article 45 of the Statute, a procedural document may be lodged or served by any appropriate means available.
Kadar je uporaba e-Curie tehnično nemogoča in brez poseganja v uporabo člena 45, drugi odstavek, Statuta, se lahko procesni akt vloži ali vroči na drug ustrezen način, ki je na voljo.
The procedure to be followed in such circumstances shall be specified in the decision referred to in paragraph 2.’
Ukrepi, ki se izvedejo v takem primeru, se določijo v odločbi iz odstavka 2.“
Article 57 is amended as follows:
Člen 57 se spremeni tako:
paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
odstavek 1 se nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Without prejudice to Article 80(1), Article 148(9) and Article 178(2) and (3), where the Statute or these Rules require a document to be served on a person the Registrar shall ensure that service is effected via e-Curia.’;
Brez poseganja v člene 80(1), 148(9) in 178(2) in (3) za vročitve, ki jih določata Statut in ta poslovnik, skrbi sodni tajnik prek e-Curie.“;
in paragraph 2, the words ‘Where, for technical reasons or on account of the nature or size of the document,’ are replaced by ‘Where, on account of the nature of the document,’ in the first sentence, and the words ‘by the method referred to in paragraph 4 or by telefax’ are replaced by the words ‘via e-Curia’ in the second and third sentences;
v odstavku 2 se del povedi v prvi povedi „Če vročitev iz tehničnih razlogov ali zaradi vrste ali obsega akta“ nadomesti z besedilom „Če vročitev zaradi narave akta“, del povedi v drugi in tretji povedi „na način iz odstavka 4 ali po telefaksu“ pa se nadomesti z besedilom „prek e-Curie“;
paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
odstavek 3 se nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Without prejudice to Article 72(4), the Registrar shall prepare and certify the copies of documents to be served pursuant to paragraph 2.’;
Brez poseganja v člen 72(4) sodni tajnik pripravi in overi prepise pisanj, ki jih je treba vročiti na podlagi odstavka 2.“;
Article 68 is amended as follows:
Člen 68 se spremeni tako:
paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
odstavek 4 se nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Procedural documents included in the files of the joined cases shall be served via e-Curia on the parties who request this.
Procesni akti, vloženi s spise v združenih zadevah, se prek e-Curie vročijo strankam, ki to zahtevajo.
The President may, however, on application by a party, order that certain information from the case file which it is claimed is confidential be excluded from such service.’;
Vendar lahko predsednik na zahtevo ene stranke iz te vročitve s sklepom izloči nekatere podatke iz spisa zadeve, katerih zaupnost se zatrjuje.“;
Article 72 is amended as follows:
Člen 72 se spremeni tako:
the wording of the title ‘Common rules for the lodging of procedural documents’ is replaced by ‘Rules for the lodging of procedural documents via e-Curia’;
besedilo naslova „Skupna pravila o vlaganju procesnih aktov“ se nadomesti z besedilom „Pravila o vlaganju procesnih aktov prek e-Curie“;
With the exception of documents lodged pursuant to Article 105(1) and (2) and Article 147(6), all procedural documents shall be lodged at the Registry via e-Curia.’;
Razen pri vložitvah iz člena 105(1) in (2) ter člena 147(6) se vsi procesni akti v sodnem tajništvu vložijo prek e-Curie.“;
the following is inserted as paragraph 4:
kot odstavek 4 se vstavi to besedilo:
Where, on account of its nature, an annex to a procedural document cannot be lodged via e-Curia, the relevant annex shall be sent separately by post or shall be delivered to the Registry.
Kadar priloge k procesnemu aktu zaradi njene narave ni mogoče vložiti prek e-Curie, se zadevna priloga pošlje ločeno po pošti ali se vloži v sodnem tajništvu.
The annex shall be submitted together with a copy for the General Court and a copy for every other party to the proceedings.
Ta priloga se vloži z izvodom za Splošno sodišče in izvodi za zadevne stranke.
Copies shall be certified as being identical by the party lodging them.’;
Izvode overi stranka, ki jih vloži.“;
paragraphs 4 and 5 are renumbered paragraphs 5 and 6.
odstavka 4 in 5 se preštevilčita in postaneta odstavka 5 in 6.
Article 73 is deleted.
Člen 73 se črta.
Article 74 is deleted.
Člen 74 se črta.
Article 77 is deleted.
Člen 77 se črta.
Article 80(1) is replaced by the following:
V členu 80 se odstavek 1 nadomesti s tem besedilom:
The application shall be served on the defendant via e-Curia if he has an e-Curia account.
Toženi stranki se tožba vroči prek e-Curie, če ima uporabniški račun e-Curia.
Where the defendant has no such account, the application shall be served on him in the form of a certified copy sent by registered post with a form for acknowledgement of receipt or by delivery of the copy against receipt.’
Če ga nima, se tožba toženi stranki vroči bodisi tako, da se ji overjeni prepis tožbe pošlje s priporočeno pošiljko s povratnico, bodisi z izročitvijo tega prepisa proti potrdilu o sprejemu.“
In Article 81(2), the reference to Article 77 is deleted and paragraph 2 is accordingly replaced by the following:
V členu 81(2) se črta sklicevanje na člen 77, tako da se odstavek 2 nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Article 78(4) to (6) shall apply to the defence.’
Za odgovor na tožbo se uporablja člen 78, od (4) do (6).“
In Article 143(4), the reference to Article 77 is deleted and paragraph 4 is accordingly replaced by the following:
V členu 143(4) se črta sklicevanje na člen 77, tako da se odstavek 4 nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Article 78(4) to (6) and Article 139 shall apply to the application to intervene.’
Za predlog za intervencijo se uporabljata člena 78, od (4) do (6), in 139.“
Article 147 is amended as follows:
Člen 147 se spremeni tako:
in paragraph 2, the sentence ‘Without prejudice to Article 74, the form must be signed by the applicant for legal aid or, if he is represented, by his lawyer.’ is deleted;
v odstavku 2 se črta poved „Brez poseganja v člen 74 ta obrazec podpiše prosilec in odvetnik, če zastopa prosilca.“
paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:
odstavek 6 se nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Where the applicant for legal aid is not represented by a lawyer, the original of the application for legal aid shall be lodged at the Registry in paper form.
Če prosilca ne zastopa odvetnik, se izvirnik prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč vloži v sodnem tajništvu v papirnati obliki.
The original of the application for legal aid must bear the handwritten signature of the applicant for legal aid.’
Prosilec mora ta izvirnik prošnje lastnoročno podpisati.“
Article 148(9) is replaced by the following:
V členu 148 se odstavek 9 nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Where the applicant for legal aid is not represented by a lawyer, a copy of the document to be served shall be served on him by registered post with a form for acknowledgement of receipt or by delivery of the copy against receipt.
Če prosilca za brezplačno pravno pomoč ne zastopa odvetnik, se mu prepis akta, ki se vroča, vroči tako, da se mu ga pošlje s priporočeno pošiljko s povratnico ali z izročitvijo tega prepisa proti potrdilu o prejemu.
Service on other parties shall be effected as provided for in Article 80(1).’
Vročitve drugim strankam se opravijo na način iz člena 80(1).“
In Article 156(5), the reference to ‘Articles 76 to 78’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Articles 76 and 78’.
V členu 156(5) se besedilo „členov od 76 do 78“ nadomesti z besedilom „členov 76 in 78“.
In Article 166(2), the reference to ‘Articles 76 to 78’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Articles 76 and 78’.
V členu 166(2) se besedilo „določajo členi od 76 do 78“ nadomesti z besedilom „določata člena 76 in 78“.
In Article 167(1), the reference to ‘Articles 76 to 78’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Articles 76 and 78’.
V členu 167(1) se besedilo „uporabljajo členi od 76 do 78“ nadomesti z besedilom „uporabljata člena 76 in 78“.
In Article 168(3), the reference to ‘Articles 76 to 78’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Articles 76 and 78’.
V členu 168(3) se besedilo „določajo členi od 76 do 78“ nadomesti z besedilom „določata člena 76 in 78“.
In Article 169(3), the reference to ‘Articles 76 to 78’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Articles 76 and 78’.
V členu 169(3) se besedilo „členi od 76 do 78“ nadomesti z besedilom „členov 76 in 78“.
In Article 170(1), the reference to ‘Articles 76 to 78’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Articles 76 and 78’.
V členu 170(1) se besedilo „členih od 76 do 78“ nadomesti z besedilom „členih 76 in 78“.
In Article 173(5), the reference to Article 77 is deleted and paragraph 5 is accordingly replaced by the following:
V členu 173(5) se sklicevanje na člen 77 črta, tako da se odstavek 5 nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Article 78(4) to (6) shall apply to the procedural document referred to in paragraph 2.’
Za procesni akt iz odstavka 2 se uporablja člen 78, od (4) do (6).“
In Article 175(4), the reference to Article 77 is deleted and paragraph 4 is accordingly replaced by the following:
V členu 175(4) se sklicevanje na člen 77 črta, tako da se odstavek 4 nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Article 78(4) to (6) and Article 139 shall apply to the application for replacement.’
Za predlog za nadomestitev se uporabljata člena 78, od (4) do (6), in 139.“
Article 177 is amended as follows:
Člen 177 se spremeni tako:
paragraph 7 is renumbered paragraph 6.
odstavek 7 se preštevilči in postane odstavek 6.
Article 178 is amended as follows:
Člen 178 se spremeni tako:
paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
odstavek 2 se nadomesti s tem besedilom:
Where the defendant has no such account, the application shall be served on him in the form of a certified copy sent by registered post with a form for acknowledgement of receipt or by delivery of the copy against receipt.’;
Če ga nima, se toženi stranki tožba vroči bodisi tako, da se overjeni prepis tožbe pošlje s priporočeno pošiljko s povratnico, bodisi z izročitvijo tega prepisa proti potrdilu o prejemu.“;
The application shall be served on a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal via e-Curia where that party has become a party to the proceedings before the General Court in accordance with Article 173(2).
Vročitev tožbe stranki v postopku pred odborom za pritožbe se opravi prek e-Curie, če je ta postala stranka v postopku pred Splošnim sodiščem v skladu s členom 173(2).
If the party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal is an institution that has an account giving access to e-Curia, service of the application shall be made by e-Curia.
Če je stranka v postopku pred odborom za pritožbe institucija, ki ima uporabniški račun e-Curia, se tožba vroči prek e-Curie.
Otherwise, the application shall be served by registered post with a form for acknowledgement of receipt at the address given by the party concerned for the purposes of the notifications to be effected in the course of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.’;
V nasprotnem primeru se ji tožba vroči s priporočeno pošiljko s povratnico na naslov, ki ga je zadevna stranka navedla za namene vročanja med postopkom pred odborom za pritožbe.“;
in paragraph 4, the reference to ‘Article 177(7)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 177(6)’.
v odstavku 4 se besedilo „člena 177(7)“ nadomesti z besedilom „člena 177(6)“.
In Article 180(2), the reference to ‘Article 177(4) to (7)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 177(4) to (6)’.
V členu 180(2) se besedilo „člen 177, od (4) do (7)“ nadomesti z besedilom „člen 177, od (4) do (6)“.
Article 194 is amended as follows:
Člen 194 se spremeni tako:
paragraph 6 is renumbered paragraph 5.
odstavek 6 se preštevilči in postane odstavek 5.
In Article 197(2), the reference to ‘Article 194(6)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 194(5)’.
V členu 197(2) se besedilo „člena 194(6)“ nadomesti z besedilom „člena 194(5)“.
In Article 199(2), the reference to ‘Article 194(3) to (6)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 194(3) to (5)’.
V členu 199(2) se besedilo „člen 194, od (3) do (6)“ nadomesti z besedilom „člen 194, od (3) do (5)“.
In Article 213(1), the reference to ‘Articles 51 to 58, 60 to 74, 79, 84, 87, 89, 90, 107 to 122, 124, 125, 129, 131, 142 to 162, 164, 165 and 167 to 170’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Articles 51 to 58, 60 to 72, 79, 84, 87, 89, 90, 107 to 122, 124, 125, 129, 131, 142 to 162, 164, 165 and 167 to 170’.
V členu 213(1) se besedilo „členi od 51 do 58, od 60 do 74, 79, 84, 87, 89, 90, od 107 do 122, 124, 125, 129, 131, od 142 do 162, 164, 165 in od 167 do 170“ nadomesti z besedilom „členi od 51 do 58, od 60 do 72, 79, 84, 87, 89, 90, od 107 do 122, 124, 125, 129, 131, od 142 do 162, 164, 165 in od 167 do 170“.
These amendments to the Rules of Procedure, authentic in the languages referred to in Article 44 of these Rules, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the first day of the third month following that of the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the decision referred to in Article 56a(2) of the Rules of Procedure.
Te spremembe Poslovnika, ki so verodostojne v jezikih iz člena 44 navedenega poslovnika, se objavijo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začnejo veljati prvi dan tretjega meseca po mesecu objave odločbe iz člena 56a(2) Poslovnika v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Amendments to the Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court
Spremembe Praktičnih določb za izvajanje Poslovnika Splošnega sodišča
Having regard to Article 224 of its Rules of Procedure;
na podlagi člena 224 svojega poslovnika;
Having regard to the Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court;
na podlagi Praktičnih določb za izvajanje Poslovnika Splošnega sodišča;
Whereas the General Court adopted amendments to its Rules of Procedure on 11 July 2018 and the Decision of the General Court on the lodging and service of procedural documents by means of e-Curia, also on 11 July 2018;
ob upoštevanju sprememb Poslovnika, ki jih je Splošno sodišče sprejelo 11. julija 2018, in odločbe Splošnega sodišča o vlaganju in vročanju procesnih aktov prek aplikacije e-Curia, ki jo je Splošno sodišče prav tako sprejelo 11. julija 2018;
Whereas, in accordance with those texts, the e-Curia application will become the only means of exchanging documents between representatives of the parties and the Registry of the General Court from 1 December 2018;
ob upoštevanju, da bo na podlagi teh aktov aplikacija e-Curia 1. decembra 2018 postala izključni način izmenjave dokumentov med zastopniki strank in sodnim tajništvom Splošnega sodišča;
Whereas certain points in the Practice Rules should be adapted accordingly;
ob upoštevanju, da je treba zato prilagoditi nekatere točke Praktičnih določb za izvajanje;
Whereas it is also desirable, in the interests of the parties and of the General Court, to provide clarification in respect of the reckoning of time limits, the submission of applications for suspension of operation or enforcement or other interim measures, the use of technology at hearings, and the rules on addressing the General Court in the case of individuals who do not have the status of representative;
ob upoštevanju, da je tudi z vidika strank in sodišča zaželeno, da se zagotovijo pojasnila glede izračuna rokov, predložitve predlogov za odlog izvršitve ali za izdajo drugih začasnih odredb, uporabe tehničnih sredstev med obravnavo in tega, kako lahko osebe, ki nimajo statusa zastopnika, prevzamejo besedo;
Whereas all references to appeals before the General Court against decisions of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal should be removed in pursuance of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2016/1192 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 on the transfer to the General Court of jurisdiction at first instance in disputes between the European Union and its servants;
ob upoštevanju, da je treba črtati vsa sklicevanja na pritožbe, vložene pri Splošnem sodišču zoper odločbe Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije, na podlagi Uredbe (EU, Euratom) 2016/1192 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. julija 2016 o prenosu pristojnosti za odločanje o sporih med Evropsko unijo in njenimi uslužbenci na prvi stopnji na Splošno sodišče;
Whereas the changes made to the text of the Practice Rules in force are such that points should be renumbered and cross-references updated to ensure greater legibility;
ob upoštevanju, da spremembe, vključene v veljavno besedilo Praktičnih določb za izvajanje, zaradi boljše preglednosti upravičujejo preštevilčenje točk in posodobitev navzkrižnega sklicevanja;
HAS ADOPTED THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE PRACTICE RULES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE GENERAL COURT:
SPREJME TE SPREMEMBE PRAKTIČNIH DOLOČB ZA IZVAJANJE POSLOVNIKA SPLOŠNEGA SODIŠČA:
The Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court are hereby amended as follows:
Praktične določbe za izvajanje Poslovnika Splošnega sodišča se spremenijo tako:
The following footnote is inserted at the end of the tenth recital after the words ‘under Article 105(11) of the Rules of Procedure’:
Na koncu desete uvodne izjave se po besedilu „na podlagi člena 105(11) Poslovnika“ vstavi ta opomba:
‘Decision (EU) 2016/2387 of the General Court of 14 September 2016 concerning the security rules applicable to information or material produced in accordance with Article 105(1) or (2) of the Rules of Procedure (OJ L 355, 24.12.2016, p. 18) (“decision of the Court of 14 September 2016”).’
„Odločba Splošnega sodišča (EU) 2016/2387 z dne 14. septembra 2016 o pravilih o varnosti za podatke ali dokazila, predložena v skladu s členom 105(1) oziroma (2) Poslovnika (UL L 355, 24.12.2016, str. 18) (v nadaljevanju: odločba Splošnega sodišča z dne 14. septembra 2016).“
After the tenth recital, the following is inserted as the eleventh recital:
Po deseti uvodni izjavi se kot enajsta uvodna izjava doda to besedilo:
‘Whereas the rules on the lodging and service of procedural documents by means of e-Curia are contained in the decision adopted by the Court under Article 56a(2) of the Rules of Procedure;’
„ob upoštevanju, da so pravila o vlaganju in vročanju procesnih aktov prek aplikacije e-Curia navedena v odločbi, ki jo je Splošno sodišče sprejelo na podlagi člena 56a(2) Poslovnika;“.
The eleventh recital is accompanied by a footnote worded as follows:
K enajsti uvodni izjavi se doda ta opomba:
‘Decision of the General Court of 11 July 2018 on the lodging and service of procedural documents by means of e-Curia (OJ L 240, 25.9.2018, p. 72) (“decision of the Court of 11 July 2018”).’
„Odločba Splošnega sodišča z dne 11. julija 2018 o vlaganju in vročanju procesnih aktov prek aplikacije e-Curia (UL L 240, 25.9.2018, str. 72) (v nadaljevanju: odločba Splošnega sodišča z dne 11. julija 2018).“
In the last recital commencing ‘After consulting’, the words ‘, now the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),’ are added after ‘the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)’.
V zadnji uvodni izjavi, ki se začenja z besedama „po posvetovanju“, se po besedilu „Urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) (UUNT)“ doda to besedilo „, ki je postal Urad Evropske unije za intelektualno lastnino (EUIPO),“.
In point 7, the words ‘Outside the Registry's opening hours, procedural documents may’ are replaced by ‘Outside the Registry's opening hours, the annex referred to in Article 72(4) of the Rules of Procedure and the procedural document referred to in Article 147(6) of the Rules of Procedure may’.
V točki 7 se besedilo „Zunaj uradnih ur sodnega tajništva se lahko procesni akti kadar koli podnevi ali ponoči veljavno vložijo“ nadomesti z besedilom „Zunaj uradnih ur sodnega tajništva se lahko priloga iz člena 72(4) Poslovnika in procesni akt iz člena 147(6) Poslovnika kadar koli podnevi ali ponoči veljavno vložita“.
In point 9, the reference to ‘the decision adopted by the Court under Article 105(11) of the Rules of Procedure’ is replaced by a reference to ‘the decision of the Court of 14 September 2016’.
V točki 9 se besedilo „odločba Splošnega sodišča, sprejeta na podlagi člena 105(11) Poslovnika“ nadomesti z besedilom „odločba Splošnega sodišča z dne 14. septembra 2016“.
In point 13:
V točki 13:
the words ‘made on the original of the procedural document lodged by the parties or on the version deemed to be the original of that document, 2 as well as on every copy which is served on them.’ are replaced by ‘made on the procedural document placed on the case file, as well as on every copy which is served on the parties.’;
se besedilo „se naredi na izvirniku procesnega akta, ki ga stranke vložijo, ali na različici, ki se šteje za izvirnik tega akta2, in na vsakem prepisu, ki se jim vroči.“ nadomesti z besedilom „se naredi na procesnem aktu, ki se vloži v spis v zadevi, in na vsakem prepisu, ki se vroči strankam.“;
the footnote is deleted.
se črta opomba.
Points 14 to 270, and the titles relating thereto, are replaced by the following:
Točke od 14 do 270 in naslovi, ki se nanje nanašajo, se nadomestijo s tem besedilom:
In the cases provided for by the first paragraph of Article 54 of the Statute, the date of lodgment referred to in point 13 above shall be the date on which the procedural document was lodged, via e-Curia, with the Registrar of the Court of Justice or, in the case of a document lodged as referred to in Article 147(6) of the Rules of Procedure, the date on which the document was lodged with the Registrar of the Court of Justice.
D. Opravilna številka zadeve