natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Salmonella species: Negative/25 g
Ta vključitev temelji na pravno zaščitenih znanstvenih dokazih in znanstvenih podatkih, zaščitenih v skladu s členom 26 Uredbe (EU) 2015/2283.
Listeria monocytogenes: Negative/25 g
Hodigozidi
Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2018/1139 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No 2111/2005, (EC) No 1008/2008, (EU) No 996/2010, (EU) No 376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 552/2004 and (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91
o skupnih pravilih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Agencije Evropske unije za varnost v letalstvu ter spremembi uredb (ES) št. 2111/2005, (ES) št. 1008/2008, (EU) št. 996/2010, (EU) št. 376/2014 ter direktiv 2014/30/EU in 2014/53/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter razveljavitvi uredb (ES) št. 552/2004 in (ES) št. 216/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3922/91
A high and uniform level of civil aviation safety should be ensured at all times by the adoption of common safety rules and by measures ensuring that any goods, persons and organisations involved in civil aviation activity in the Union comply with such rules.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba stalno visoko in enotno raven varnosti v civilnem letalstvu s sprejetjem skupnih varnostnih predpisov in z ukrepi, ki zagotavljajo skladnost vsega blaga, ki se uporablja pri dejavnostih civilnega letalstva v Uniji, ter vseh oseb in organizacij, ki te dejavnosti izvajajo, s takimi pravili.
In addition, a high and uniform level of environmental protection should be ensured at all times by measures ensuring that any goods, persons and organisations involved in civil aviation activity in the Union comply with relevant Union law, and with international standards and recommended practices.
Prav tako bi bilo treba za stalno visoko in enotno raven varstva okolja skrbeti z ukrepi, ki zagotavljajo, da so vse blago ter ravnanje vseh oseb in organizacij, ki izvajajo dejavnosti civilnega letalstva v Uniji, v skladu z ustreznim pravom Unije ter z mednarodnimi standardi in priporočenimi praksami.
In addition, third-country aircraft that are operated into, within or out of the territory where the relevant provisions of the Treaty on European Union (‘TEU’) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) (the ‘Treaties’) apply should be subject to appropriate oversight at Union level within the limits set by the Convention on International Civil Aviation, signed in Chicago on 7 December 1944 (the ‘Chicago Convention’), to which all Member States are parties.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba zrakoplove tretjih držav, ki letijo na ozemlje, kjer se uporabljajo ustrezne določbe Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pogodbi), ali znotraj njega ali odletijo s tega ozemlja, ustrezno nadzirati na ravni Unije v okviru omejitev iz Konvencije o mednarodnem civilnem letalstvu, podpisane 7. decembra 1944 v Čikagu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Čikaška konvencija), katere pogodbenice so vse države članice.
It would not be appropriate to subject all aircraft to common rules.
Ne bi bilo primerno, da bi skupna pravila veljala za vse zrakoplove.
In particular, in light of their limited risk to civil aviation safety, aircraft that are of simple design or operate mainly on a local basis, and those which are home-built or particularly rare or only exist in a small number, should remain under the regulatory control of the Member States, without any obligation under this Regulation on other Member States to recognise such national arrangements.
Zlasti nad preprosto projektiranimi zrakoplovi ali tistimi, ki se uporabljajo predvsem za lokalne lete, ter nad doma narejenimi ali izredno redkimi oziroma maloštevilnimi zrakoplovi bi morale glede na njihovo omejeno ogrožanje varnosti v civilnem letalstvu regulativni nadzor še naprej izvajati države članice, pri čemer druge države članice po tej uredbi niso zavezane, da take nacionalne ureditve priznajo.
However, in order to facilitate the development of national rules for aircraft falling outside the scope of this Regulation, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (‘the Agency’) can adopt guidance material for that purpose.
Lahko pa Agencija Evropske unije za varnost v letalstvu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) sprejme smernice, na podlagi katerih bi bilo laže pripraviti nacionalna pravila za zrakoplove, ki ne spadajo na področje uporabe te uredbe.
However, provision should be made for the possibility to apply certain provisions under this Regulation to certain types of aircraft which are otherwise excluded from the scope of this Regulation, especially those which are produced in an industrial manner and which could benefit from free circulation within the Union.
Vendar je treba predvideti možnost uporabe nekaterih določb te uredbe za določene tipe zrakoplovov, ki so drugače izključeni s področja uporabe te uredbe, zlasti tiste, ki se proizvajajo industrijsko in bi lahko imeli koristi zaradi prostega kroženja znotraj Unije.
Therefore, organisations involved in the design of such aircraft should be allowed to apply for a type certificate to the Agency or, if applicable, to make a declaration to the Agency in respect of an aircraft type which is to be put on the market by such organisations.
Zato bi morale organizacije, ki sodelujejo pri projektiranju takih zrakoplovov, imeti možnost, da v zvezi s tipom zrakoplova, ki ga bodo dale na trg, Agencijo zaprosijo za certifikat tipa ali da ji po potrebi predložijo izjavo.
This Regulation should provide for a number of new tools that should support the implementation of simple and proportionate rules for sport and recreational aviation.
V tej uredbi bi bilo treba določiti več novih orodij za pomoč pri izvajanju enostavnih in sorazmernih pravil za športno in rekreativno letalstvo.
The measures taken in accordance with this Regulation to regulate this segment of the aviation sector should be proportionate, cost-efficient, flexible and based on existing best practices in the Member States.
Ukrepi, sprejeti v skladu s to uredbo in s katerimi naj bi se uredil ta segment letalskega sektorja, bi morali biti sorazmerni, stroškovno učinkoviti in prilagodljivi ter bi morali temeljiti na obstoječih dobrih praksah v državah članicah.
Those measures should be developed in a timely manner, in close cooperation with the Member States and should avoid creating unnecessary administrative and financial burden for the manufacturers and operators.
Te ukrepe bi bilo treba pripraviti pravočasno in v tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami, proizvajalcem in operatorjem pa ne bi smeli ustvarjati nepotrebnih upravnih in finančnih bremen.
It would not be appropriate to subject all aerodromes to common rules.
Ne bi bilo primerno, da bi skupna pravila veljala za vse aerodrome.
Aerodromes which are not open to public use or aerodromes which do not serve commercial air transport or aerodromes without paved instrument runways of more than 800 metres and which do not exclusively serve helicopters using instrument approach or departure procedures should remain under the regulatory control of the Member States, without any obligation under this Regulation on other Member States to recognise such national arrangements.
Aerodromi, ki niso namenjeni javni rabi, ali aerodromi, ki niso namenjeni komercialnemu zračnemu prevozu, ali aerodromi brez tlakovanih instrumentalnih vzletno-pristajalnih stez dolžine več kot 800 metrov, ki niso namenjeni izključno helikopterjem, ki uporabljajo postopke instrumentalnega prileta ali odhoda, bi morali ostati pod regulativnim nadzorom držav članic, pri čemer druge države članice po tej uredbi ne bi smele imeti nikakršne obveznosti, da take nacionalne ureditve priznajo.
Member States should be allowed to exempt from this Regulation aerodromes with low volumes of traffic, provided that the aerodromes concerned meet the minimum common safety objectives laid down in the relevant essential requirements set out in this Regulation.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da iz te uredbe izvzamejo aerodrome z majhnim obsegom prometa, če zadevni aerodromi izpolnjujejo minimalne skupne varnostne cilje, določene v ustreznih bistvenih zahtevah iz te uredbe.
When a Member State grants such exemptions, those exemptions should also apply to the equipment used at the aerodrome concerned and to the providers of groundhandling services and apron management services (‘AMS’) operating at the exempted aerodromes.
Kadar država članica odobri take izjeme, bi morale te izjeme veljati tudi za opremo, ki se uporablja na zadevnem aerodromu, ter za izvajalce storitev zemeljske oskrbe in upravljanja ploščadi, ki delujejo na izvzetih aerodromih.
Exemptions granted by Member States to aerodromes before the entry into force of this Regulation should remain valid, and information about those exemptions should be made available to the public.
Izjeme, ki so jih države članice odobrile za aerodrome pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, bi morale ostati veljavne, informacije o teh izjemah pa bi morale biti dane na voljo javnosti.
Aerodromes that are controlled and operated by the military, as well as air traffic management and air navigation services (‘ATM/ANS’) that are provided or made available by the military, should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Aerodromi, ki jih kontrolira in upravlja vojska, ter upravljanje zračnega prometa in izvajanje navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa (ATM/ANS), ki jih zagotavlja ali daje na voljo vojska, bi morali biti izključeni s področja uporabe te uredbe.
However, Member States should ensure, in accordance with their national law, that such aerodromes, when opened to the public, and such ATM/ANS when serving air traffic to which Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies, offer a level of safety and interoperability with civil systems that is as effective as that resulting from the application of the essential requirements for aerodromes and ATM/ANS set out in this Regulation.
Vendar pa bi morale države članice v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom zagotoviti, da taki aerodromi, kadar so odprti za javnost, in taki ATM/ANS, kadar se uporabljajo za zračni promet, za katerega se uporablja Uredba (ES) št. 549/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ponujajo raven varnosti in interoperabilnosti s civilnimi sistemi, ki je tako učinkovita kot raven, dosežena z uporabo bistvenih zahtev za aerodrome in ATM/ANS, določenih v tej uredbi.
Where Member States consider it preferable, in particular with a view to achieving safety, interoperability or efficiency gains, to apply, instead of their national law, this Regulation to aircraft carrying out military, customs, police, search and rescue, firefighting, border control and coastguard or similar activities and services undertaken in the public interest, they should be allowed to do so.
Kadar države članice presodijo, da je za zrakoplove, ki se uporabljajo za vojaške, carinske, policijske, iskalne in reševalne ter gasilske dejavnosti in storitve, dejavnosti in storitve mejnega nadzora in obalne straže ali podobne dejavnosti in storitve, ki se izvajajo v javnem interesu, namesto njihovega nacionalnega prava bolje uporabljati to uredbo, zlasti zaradi varnosti, interoperabilnosti in učinkovitosti, bi jim bilo treba to omogočiti.
Member States making use of this possibility should cooperate with the Agency, in particular by providing all the information necessary for confirming that the aircraft and activities concerned comply with the relevant provisions of this Regulation.
Države članice, ki uporabljajo to možnost, bi morale sodelovati z Agencijo, zlasti z zagotavljanjem vseh informacij, potrebnih za potrditev, da so zadevni zrakoplovi in dejavnosti v skladu z zadevnimi določbami te uredbe.
In order to take into account the interests and views of their aeronautical industry and aircraft operators, Member States should be allowed to exempt from this Regulation the design, production, maintenance and operation activities which are performed in respect of certain small aircraft, other than unmanned aircraft, unless, in respect of those aircraft, a certificate in accordance with this Regulation or with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council has been issued, or has been deemed to have been issued, or a declaration has been made in accordance with this Regulation.
Državam članicami bi zaradi upoštevanja interesov in mnenj lastne aeronavtične industrije in operatorjev zrakoplovov moralo biti dovoljeno, da iz te uredbe izvzamejo dejavnosti projektiranja, proizvodnje, vzdrževanja in upravljanja, ki se izvajajo za nekatere manjše zrakoplove, ki niso brezpilotni zrakoplovi, razen če je bil v zvezi s temi zrakoplovi izdan ali se šteje, da je bil izdan, certifikat v skladu s to uredbo ali Uredbo (ES) št. 216/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ali je bila v zvezi z njimi dana izjava v skladu s to uredbo.
Such exemptions should not create any obligation under this Regulation for other Member States to recognise such national arrangements.
Druge države članice zaradi teh izjem na podlagi te uredbe ne bi smele biti obvezane priznati takih nacionalnih ureditev.
However, such exemptions should not prevent an organisation with a principal place of business in the territory of the Member State which has granted that exemption from deciding to conduct its design and production activities in respect of aircraft covered by that decision in accordance with this Regulation and with the delegated and implementing acts adopted on the basis thereof.
Vendar pa take izjeme ne bi smele preprečiti, da se organizacija z glavnim krajem poslovanja na ozemlju države članice, ki je odobrila to izjemo, odloči, da bo svoje dejavnosti projektiranja in proizvodnje v zvezi z zrakoplovi, zajetimi v navedeni odločitvi, izvedla v skladu s to uredbo ter delegiranimi in izvedbenimi akti, sprejetimi na podlagi te uredbe.
The measures taken in accordance with this Regulation to regulate civil aviation in the Union, and the delegated and implementing acts adopted on the basis thereof, should correspond and be proportionate to the nature and risks associated with the different types of aircraft, operations and activities they address.
Ukrepi za ureditev civilnega letalstva v Uniji, sprejeti v skladu s to uredbo, ter delegirani in izvedbeni akti, sprejeti na podlagi te uredbe, bi morali biti v skladu in sorazmerni z naravo različnih vrst zrakoplovov, operacij in dejavnosti, ki jih obravnavajo, ter tveganji, povezanimi z njimi.
Such measures should also, in as far as possible, be formulated in a manner which focuses on objectives to be achieved, while allowing different means of achieving those objectives, and should also foster a systemic approach to civil aviation, taking into account interdependencies between safety and other technical domains of aviation regulation, including cyber security.
Prav tako bi se morali takšni ukrepi, kolikor je to mogoče, oblikovati na način, ki se osredotoča na cilje, ki jih je treba doseči, hkrati pa omogoča različna sredstva za doseganje navedenih ciljev, in bi tudi morali spodbujati sistemski pristop k civilnemu letalstvu, ter pri tem upoštevati soodvisnost varnosti in drugih tehničnih področij letalskih predpisov, vključno s kibernetsko varnostjo.
This should contribute to a more cost-efficient achievement of required safety levels and to the stimulation of technical and operational innovation.
To bi moralo prispevati k stroškovno učinkovitejšemu doseganju zahtevanih ravni varnosti ter spodbujanju tehničnih in operativnih inovacij.
Use should be made of recognised industry standards and practices, where it has been found that they ensure compliance with the essential requirements set out in this Regulation.
Uporabljati bi bilo treba priznane standarde in prakse industrije, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da zagotavljajo skladnost z bistvenimi zahtevami iz te uredbe.
Application of sound safety management principles is essential for continuous improvement of civil aviation safety in the Union, anticipating emerging safety risks, and making best use of limited technical resources.
Za stalno izboljševanje varnosti v civilnem letalstvu v Uniji, predvidevanje novih varnostnih tveganj in čim boljšo uporabo omejenih tehničnih sredstev je bistvenega pomena uporaba načel dobrega upravljanja varnosti.
It is therefore necessary to establish a common framework for planning and implementing safety improvement actions.
Zato je treba vzpostaviti skupni okvir za načrtovanje in izvajanje ukrepov za izboljšanje varnosti.
To that end, a European Plan for Aviation Safety and a European Aviation Safety Programme should be drawn up at Union level.
V ta namen bi bilo treba na ravni Unije izdelati evropski načrt za varnost v letalstvu in evropski letalski varnostni program.
Each Member State should also draw up a State Safety Programme in accordance with the requirements contained in Annex 19 to the Chicago Convention.
Poleg tega bi morala vsaka država članica izdelati državni varnostni program v skladu z zahtevami iz Priloge 19 k Čikaški konvenciji.
That Programme should be accompanied by a plan describing the actions to be taken by the Member State to mitigate the identified safety risks.
Navedenemu programu bi bilo treba priložiti načrt z opisom ukrepov, ki jih mora država članica sprejeti za zmanjšanje ugotovljenih varnostnih tveganj.
In accordance with Annex 19 to the Chicago Convention, Member States are to establish an acceptable level of safety performance in relation to the aviation activities under their responsibility.
Države članice morajo v skladu s Prilogo 19 k Čikaški konvenciji vzpostaviti sprejemljivo raven varnostne uspešnosti v zvezi z letalskimi dejavnostmi, ki sodijo v njihovo odgovornost.
In order to assist the Member States in meeting this requirement in a coordinated manner, the European Plan for Aviation Safety should lay down a level of safety performance for the Union in respect to the different categories of aviation activities.
Da bi lahko države članice usklajeno izpolnile to zahtevo, bi moral evropski načrt za varnost v letalstvu v zvezi z različnimi kategorijami letalskih dejavnosti določiti raven varnostne uspešnosti za Unijo.
That level of safety performance should not have a binding character but should rather express the ambition of the Union and of the Member States with regard to civil aviation safety.
Ta raven varnostne uspešnosti ne bi smela biti zavezujoča, temveč bi morala izražati prizadevnost Unije in držav članic na področju varnosti v civilnem letalstvu.
The Chicago Convention provides for minimum standards to ensure the safety of civil aviation and environmental protection relating thereto.
Čikaška konvencija določa minimalne standarde za zagotavljanje varnosti v civilnem letalstvu in s tem povezanega varstva okolja.
The Union's essential requirements and further rules for their implementation established in this Regulation should ensure that Member States fulfil, in a uniform manner, the obligations laid down in the Chicago Convention, including those vis-à-vis third countries.
Z bistvenimi zahtevami Unije in nadaljnjimi pravili za njihovo izvajanje, določenimi v tej uredbi, bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da države članice enotno izpolnjujejo obveznosti iz Čikaške konvencije, vključno s tistimi do tretjih držav.
Where Union rules differ from the minimum standards established by the Chicago Convention, the obligations of Member States to notify the International Civil Aviation Organization accordingly are not affected.
Kadar se pravila Unije razlikujejo od minimalnih standardov, določenih s Čikaško konvencijo, so države članice še vedno dolžne o tem ustrezno uradno obvestiti Mednarodno organizacijo civilnega letalstva.
In line with the international standards and recommended practices set by the Chicago Convention, essential requirements applicable to aeronautical products, parts, non-installed equipment, aerodromes and the provision of ATM/ANS should be established.
V skladu z mednarodnimi standardi in priporočenimi praksami iz Čikaške konvencije bi bilo treba določiti bistvene zahteve, ki bi se uporabljale za aeronavtične izdelke, dele, nenameščeno opremo, aerodrome in zagotavljanje ATM/ANS.
Furthermore, essential requirements applicable to persons and organisations involved in the operation of aircraft, the operation of aerodromes and in the provision of ATM/ANS, and essential requirements applicable to persons and products involved in the training and medical examination of aircrew and air traffic controllers should also be established.
Določiti bi bilo treba tudi bistvene zahteve, ki bi se uporabljale za osebe in organizacije, ki upravljajo zrakoplove in obratujejo aerodrome ter zagotavljajo ATM/ANS, in bistvene zahteve, ki bi se uporabljale za osebe in izdelke, ki sodelujejo oziroma se uporabljajo pri usposabljanju in zdravstvenih pregledih letalske posadke in kontrolorjev zračnega prometa.
It is important that personnel used by ATM/ANS providers, such as Air Traffic Safety Electronics Personnel (‘ATSEP’) are appropriately qualified and trained to perform their duties.
Pomembno je, da je osebje, ki ga zaposlujejo izvajalci ATM/ANS, kot je tehnično osebje za področje varnosti zračnega prometa (ATSEP), ustrezno kvalificirano in usposobljeno za izvajanje svojih nalog.
ATM/ANS providers should also implement training and checking programmes, taking into account the different types of safety-related tasks performed by their personnel.
Izvajalci ATM/ANS bi morali izvajati tudi programe usposabljanja in preverjanja, pri tem pa upoštevati, da njihovo osebje opravlja različne vrste nalog na področju varnosti.
The implementing acts adopted under this Regulation and concerning responsibilities of ATM/ANS providers should lay down further detailed harmonised rules for such personnel, including ATSEP to ensure the necessary level of safety.
Za tako osebje, med drugim tudi za ATSEP, bi bilo treba v izvedbenih aktih, sprejetih na podlagi te uredbe, ki zadevajo odgovornost izvajalcev ATM/ANS, zaradi zagotovitve potrebne ravni varnosti določiti nadaljnja podrobna harmonizirana pravila.
The essential requirements concerning environmental compatibility of the design of aeronautical products should address, where necessary, both aircraft noise and emissions to protect the environment and human health from harmful effects of those products.
Bistvene zahteve v zvezi z okoljsko sprejemljivostjo projekta aeronavtičnih izdelkov bi se morale po potrebi nanašati tako na hrup kot emisije, ki jih povzročajo zrakoplovi, zaradi varstva okolja in zdravja ljudi pred škodljivimi učinki navedenih izdelkov.
They should correspond to the requirements which have been established in this regard at international level, as laid down in the Chicago Convention.
Ustrezati bi morale zahtevam, ki so bile v zvezi s tem določene na mednarodni ravni, kakor so vsebovane v Čikaški konvenciji.
In order to ensure full consistency, it is appropriate to refer in this Regulation to the relevant provisions of that Convention.
Za zagotovitev popolne skladnosti se je v tej uredbi primerno sklicevati na ustrezne določbe navedene konvencije.
However, products, parts and non-installed equipment should be made subject to the essential requirements for environmental compatibility laid down in Annex III to this Regulation to the extent that the provisions of the Chicago Convention do not contain environmental protection requirements.
Vendar bi za izdelke, dele in nenameščeno opremo morale veljati bistvene zahteve za okoljsko sprejemljivost iz Priloge III k tej uredbi, kolikor določbe Čikaške konvencije ne vsebujejo zahtev glede varstva okolja.
As regards those products, parts and non-installed equipment, provision should also be made for the possibility of laying down detailed environmental protection requirements.
Za navedene izdelke, dele in nenameščeno opremo bi bilo treba tudi predvideti možnost, da se določijo podrobne zahteve glede varstva okolja.