natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A person or entity should be excluded by the authorising officer responsible where it has been established by a final judgment or a final administrative decision that the person or entity is guilty of grave professional misconduct, of non-compliance, whether intentional or not, with the obligations relating to the payment of social security contributions or taxes, of the creation of an entity in a different jurisdiction with the intent to circumvent fiscal, social or any other legal obligations, of fraud affecting the budget, of corruption, of conduct related to a criminal organisation, of money laundering or terrorist financing, of terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, of child labour or other offences concerning trafficking in human beings or of the commitment of an irregularity.
Odgovorni odredbodajalec bi moral izključiti osebo ali subjekt, kadar je bila oseba ali subjekt s pravnomočno sodbo ali pravnomočno upravno odločbo spoznana za krivo hude kršitve poklicnih pravil, namernega ali nenamernega neizpolnjevanja obveznosti, povezanih s plačevanjem prispevkov za socialno varnost ali davkov, ustanovitve subjekta v drugi jurisdikciji z namenom izogniti se davčnim, socialnim ali drugim pravnim obveznostim, goljufije v škodo proračuna, korupcije, sodelovanja v hudodelski združbi, pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma, terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali dejanj povezanih s terorističnimi kaznivimi dejanji, glede dela otrok ali drugega kaznivega dejanja v zvezi s trgovino z ljudmi ali nepravilnosti.
A person or entity should also be excluded in the event of a serious breach of a legal commitment or of bankruptcy.
Osebo ali subjekt bi bilo treba izključiti tudi v primeru resne kršitve pravne obveznosti ali v primeru stečaja.
When taking a decision on the exclusion of a person or entity, or the imposition of a financial penalty on a person or entity, and on the publication of the related information, the authorising officer responsible should ensure compliance with the principle of proportionality, in particular by taking into account the seriousness of the situation, its budgetary impact, the time which has elapsed since the relevant conduct, the duration of the conduct and its recurrence, whether the conduct was intentional or the degree of negligence shown and the degree of collaboration of the person or entity with the relevant competent authority and the contribution of that person or entity to the investigation.
Odgovorni odredbodajalec bi moral pri odločitvi, ali naj izključi osebo ali subjekt oziroma osebi ali subjektu naloži denarno kazen in objavi s tem povezane informacije, zagotoviti spoštovanje načela sorazmernosti, zlasti z upoštevanjem resnosti položaja, njegovega vpliv na proračun, čas, ki je pretekel od zadevnega ravnanja, trajanje in ponovitev tega ravnanja, namen ali stopnjo malomarnosti ter sodelovanje osebe ali subjekta z zadevnim pristojnim organom v preiskavi in prispevek te osebe ali subjekta k preiskavi.
The authorising officer responsible should also be able to exclude a person or entity where a natural or legal person assuming unlimited liability for the debts of the economic operator is bankrupt or in a similar situation of insolvency or where that natural or legal person fails to comply with its obligations to pay social security contributions or taxes, where such situations have an impact on the financial situation of that economic operator.
Prav tako bi moralo biti odgovornemu odredbodajalcu omogočeno, da izključi osebo ali subjekt, kadar je fizična ali pravna oseba, ki prevzame neomejeno odgovornost za dolgove te osebe ali subjekta, v stečaju ali podobnem insolventnem stanju oziroma fizična ali pravna oseba ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti glede plačevanja prispevkov za socialno varnost ali davkov, kadar to vpliva na finančni položaj gospodarskega subjekta.
A person or entity should not be subject to a decision on exclusion when it has taken remedial measures, thus demonstrating its reliability.
Glede osebe ali subjekta se ne bi smela sprejeti odločitev o izključitvi, če je sprejel popravne ukrepe in s tem dokazal svojo zanesljivost.
That possibility should not apply in cases of the most severe criminal activities.
Ta možnost se ne bi smela uporabljati za najhujša kazniva dejanja.
In light of the principle of proportionality, a distinction should be made between cases where it is possible to impose a financial penalty as an alternative to exclusion, on the one hand, and cases where the gravity of the conduct of the recipient concerned in respect of attempting to unduly obtain Union funds justifies the imposition of a financial penalty in addition to the exclusion so as to ensure a deterrent effect, on the other.
Zaradi načela sorazmernosti bi bilo treba razlikovati med primeri, v katerih se denarna kazen lahko naloži kot alternativa izključitvi na eni strani in primeri, v katerih se zaradi resnosti ravnanja prejemnika v zvezi s poskusom neupravičene pridobitve sredstev Unije denarna kazen upravičeno naloži kot dopolnilo izključitvi z namenom zagotovitve odvračilnega učinka na drugi strani.
The maximum amount of the financial penalty which can be imposed by the contracting authority should also be defined.
Določiti bi bilo treba tudi najvišji znesek denarne kazni, ki jo lahko naloži javni naročnik.
A financial penalty should only be imposed on a recipient and not on a participant given that the amount of the financial penalty to be imposed is calculated on the basis of the value of the legal commitment at stake.
Denarno kazen bi bilo treba naložiti samo prejemniku, ne pa tudi udeležencu, saj se znesek naložene denarne kazni izračuna na podlagi vrednosti zadevne pravne obveznosti.
The possibility to take decisions on exclusion or to impose financial penalties is independent from the possibility to apply contractual penalties, such as liquidated damages.
Možnost sprejetja odločitve o izključitvi ali naložitve denarnih kazni ni odvisna od možnosti uporabe pogodbenih kazni, kot so pavšalne odškodnine.
The duration of an exclusion should be limited in time, as is the case under Directive 2014/24/EU, and should be in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
Trajanje izključitve bi moralo biti v časovno omejeno, kot se zgodi tudi za primere na podlagi Direktive 2014/24/EU, in bi moralo biti skladno z načelom sorazmernosti.
It is necessary to determine the commencement date and the duration of the limitation period for taking decisions on exclusion or imposing financial penalties.
Določiti je treba datum začetka in trajanje zastaralnega roka za sprejetje odločitev o izključitvi ali naložitvi denarnih kazni.
It is important to be able to reinforce the deterrent effect achieved by the exclusion and the financial penalty.
Pomembno je omogočiti okrepitev odvračilnega učinka, doseženega z izključitvijo in denarno kaznijo.
In that regard, the deterrent effect should be reinforced by the possibility to publish the information related to the exclusion and/or to the financial penalty in a manner that satisfies the data-protection requirements set out in Regulations (EC) No 45/2001 and (EU) No 2016/679.
V tem smislu bi bilo treba odvračilni učinek okrepiti z možnostjo, da se ob doslednem spoštovanju zahtev glede varstva podatkov iz uredb (ES) št. 45/2001 in (EU) 2016/679 objavijo informacije, ki se nanašajo na izključitev in/ali denarno kazen.
Such publication should contribute to ensuring that the same conduct is not repeated.
Takšna objava bi morala prispevati k zagotovitvi, da se enako ravnanje ne ponovi.
For reasons of legal certainty and in accordance with the principle of proportionality it should be specified in which situations a publication should not take place.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti bi bilo treba določiti, v katerih okoliščinah se te informacije ne bi smele objaviti.
In its assessment, the authorising officer responsible should have regard to any recommendation of the panel.
Odgovorni odredbodajalec bi moral pri svojem ocenjevanju upoštevati morebitna priporočila posebne komisije.
As far as natural persons are concerned, personal data should only be published in exceptional circumstances justified by the seriousness of the conduct or its impact on the financial interests of the Union.
Če gre za fizične osebe, bi se smeli osebni podatki objaviti le v izjemnih okoliščinah, ki jih upravičuje resnost dejanja ali njegov učinek na finančne interese Unije.
Information related to an exclusion or to a financial penalty should only be published in certain cases such as grave professional misconduct, fraud, a significant deficiency in complying with the main obligations of a legal commitment financed by the budget, or an irregularity, or where an entity is created in a different jurisdiction with the intent to circumvent fiscal, social or any other legal obligations.
Informacije, ki se nanašajo na izključitev ali denarno kazen, bi moralo biti mogoče objaviti le v določenih primerih, kot na primer v primeru hude kršitve poklicnih pravil, goljufije, znatne pomanjkljivosti pri izpolnjevanju glavnih obveznosti prevzete pravne obveznosti, financirane iz proračuna, ali nepravilnosti ali v primeru ustanovitve subjekta v drugi jurisdikciji z namenom izogniti se davčnim, socialnim in drugim pravnim obveznostim.
The criteria for exclusion should be clearly separated from the criteria leading to a possible rejection from an award procedure.
Merila za izključitev bi morala biti jasno ločena od meril, ki so razlog za morebitno zavrnitev sodelovanja v postopku dodeljevanja.
The information on the early detection of risks and on decisions on exclusion and the imposition of financial penalties on a person or entity should be centralised.
Informacije o zgodnjem odkrivanju tveganj in o odločitvah o izključitvi in naložitvi denarnih kazni osebam ali subjektom bi bilo treba centralizirati.
For that purpose, related information should be stored in a database set up and operated by the Commission as the owner of the centralised system.
V ta namen bi bilo treba zadevne informacije shranjevati v podatkovni zbirki, ki jo vzpostavi in vodi Komisija kot lastnica centraliziranega sistema.
That system should operate in compliance with the right to privacy and the protection of personal data.
Pri vodenju tega sistema bi bilo treba v celoti upoštevati pravico do zasebnosti in do varstva osebnih podatkov.
While the setting-up and the operation of the early-detection and exclusion system should be the responsibility of the Commission, other Union institutions and bodies, as well as all persons and entities implementing Union funds under direct, shared and indirect management, should participate in that system by transmitting relevant information to the Commission.
Za vzpostavitev in delovanje sistema za zgodnje odkrivanje in izključitev bi morala biti odgovorna Komisija, vendar pa bi morali v sistemu sodelovati tudi druge institucije in organi Unije ter sploh vse osebe in subjekti, ki izvršujejo sredstva Unije v okviru neposrednega, deljenega in posrednega upravljanja, in sicer s pošiljanjem relevantnih informacij Komisiji.
The authorising officer responsible and the panel should guarantee the right of defence of the person or entity.
Odgovorni odredbodajalec in posebna komisija bi morala osebi ali subjektu zagotavljati pravico do obrambe.
The same right should be given to a person or entity, in the context of an early detection, where an act envisaged by an authorising officer could adversely affect the rights of the person or entity concerned.
Enako pravico v okviru zgodnjega odkrivanja bi morala imeti oseba ali subjekt, kadar bi lahko akt, ki bi ga nameraval sprejeti odredbodajalec, negativno vplival na pravice zadevne osebe ali subjekta.
In cases of fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union which are not yet subject to a final judgment, it should be possible for the authorising officer responsible to defer the notification of the person or entity and for the panel to defer the right of the person or entity to submit its observations.
V primeru goljufije, korupcije ali katerega koli drugega nezakonitega ravnanja, ki škodi finančnim interesom Unije, za katero še ni bila izrečena pravnomočna sodba, bi morala biti odgovornemu odredbodajalcu dana možnost, da odloži uradno obvestitev osebe ali subjekta, posebni komisiji pa, da odloži pravico osebe ali subjekta do predložitve pripomb.
Such deferral should only be justified where there are compelling legitimate grounds to preserve the confidentiality of the investigation or of national judicial proceedings.
Takšna odložitev bi morala biti upravičena le, kadar za to obstajajo nujni upravičeni razlogi zaradi ohranjanja zaupnosti preiskave ali nacionalnega sodnega postopka.
The Court of Justice of the European Union should be given unlimited jurisdiction with regard to decisions on exclusion and financial penalties imposed pursuant to this Regulation, in accordance with Article 261 TFEU.
Sodišče Evropske unije bi moralo imeti v zvezi z odločitvami o izključitvi in s kaznimi, naloženimi na podlagi te uredbe, v skladu s členom 261 PDEU neomejeno pristojnost.
In order to facilitate the protection of the financial interests of the Union across all methods of budget implementation, it should be possible for the persons and entities involved in budget implementation under shared and indirect management to take into account, as appropriate, exclusions decided upon by the authorising officers at Union level.
Da bi bila ne glede na način izvrševanja proračuna omogočena zaščita finančnih interesov Unije, bi morali osebe in subjekti, vključeni v izvrševanje proračuna na podlagi deljenega in posrednega upravljanja, po potrebi upoštevati izključitve, o katerih odločijo odredbodajalci na ravni Unije.
This Regulation should foster the objective of e-government, in particular the use of electronic data in the exchange of information between Union institutions and third parties.
Ta uredba bi morala spodbujati cilj uvedbe e-uprave, zlasti uporabo elektronskih podatkov za izmenjavo informacij med institucijami Unije in tretjimi stranmi.
Progress towards the electronic exchange of information and the electronic submission of documents, including e-procurement, where appropriate, which constitute a major simplification measure, should be accompanied by clear conditions for the acceptance of the systems to be used, so as to establish a legally sound environment while preserving flexibility in the management of Union funds for the participants, recipients and the authorising officers as provided for in this Regulation.
Napredek pri uveljavljanju elektronske izmenjave informacij in elektronske predložitve dokumentov, po potrebi vključno z elektronskim javnim naročanjem, ki je pomemben poenostavitveni ukrep, bi morali spremljati jasni pogoji za sprejetje sistemov, ki se bodo uporabljali, da se vzpostavi pravno stabilno okolje ter hkrati ohrani prožnost pri upravljanju sredstev Unije za udeležence, prejemnike in odredbodajalce, kot določa ta uredba.
Rules on the composition and tasks of the committee in charge of evaluating application documents in procurement procedures, grant award procedures and in contests for prizes should be laid down.
Določiti bi bilo treba pravila o sestavi in nalogah odbora, ki je odgovoren za oceno dokumentacije vloge v postopkih javnega naročanja, postopkih za dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev in natečajih za nagrade.
It should be possible for the committee to include external experts where that possibility is provided for in the basic act.
Odbor bi moral imeti možnost, da vključi zunanje strokovnjake, kadar je ta možnost določena v temeljnem aktu.
In line with the principle of good administration, the authorising officer should request clarifications or missing documents while respecting the principle of equality of treatment and without substantially changing the application documents.
V skladu z načelom dobrega upravljanja bi moral odredbodajalec pojasnila ali manjkajoče dokumente zahtevati ob upoštevanju načela enakega obravnavanja in brez vsebinske spremembe dokumentacije vloge.
The authorising officer should have the possibility to decide not to do so only in duly justified cases.
Odredbodajalec bi moral imeti možnost, da se odloči, da tega ne zahteva le v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih.
In addition, the authorising officer should be able to correct an obvious clerical error or request the participant to correct it.
Poleg tega bi moral imeti odredbodajalec možnost, da popravi očitne administrativne napake ali popravek zahteva od udeleženca.
Sound financial management should require that the Commission protects itself by requesting guarantees at the time of paying pre-financing.
V skladu z dobrim finančnim poslovodenjem bi se morala Komisija zaščititi, in sicer tako, da bi ob izplačilu predhodnega financiranja zahtevala predložitev jamstva.
The requirement for contractors and beneficiaries to lodge guarantees should not be automatic, but should be based on a risk analysis.
Zahteva za izvajalce in upravičence, da zagotovijo jamstva, ne bi smela biti samodejna, temveč bi morala temeljiti na analizi tveganja.
Where, in the course of implementation, the authorising officer discovers that a guarantor is not or is no longer authorised to issue guarantees in accordance with the applicable national law, the authorising officer should be able to require replacement of the guarantee.
Kadar odredbodajalec med izvrševanjem ugotovi, da izdajatelj jamstva ni več pooblaščen za izdajo jamstev v skladu z veljavnim nacionalnim pravom, bi moral imeti možnost, da zahteva nadomestitev jamstva.
The different sets of rules for direct and indirect management, in particular as regards the concept of ‘budget implementation tasks’, have created confusion and entailed risks of errors of qualification both for the Commission and for its partners and should thus be simplified and harmonised.
Različni sklopi pravil za neposredno in posredno upravljanje, zlasti v zvezi s konceptom „naloge izvrševanja proračuna“, so uvedli zmedo in povzročili tveganje napak v zvezi s kvalifikacijo tako za Komisijo kot za njene partnerje ter bi jih bilo zato treba poenostaviti in uskladiti.
The provisions on the ex ante pillar assessment of persons and entities implementing Union funds under indirect management should be revised to enable the Commission to rely as much as possible on the systems, rules and procedures of those persons and entities which have been deemed equivalent to the ones used by the Commission.
Določbe v zvezi s predhodnim stebrnim ocenjevanjem oseb in subjektov, ki izvršujejo sredstva Unije v okviru posrednega upravljanja bi bilo treba pregledati, da se Komisiji omogoči, da se lahko čim bolj opre na sisteme, pravila in postopke teh oseb in subjektov, ki so bili ocenjeni za enakovredne sistemom in postopkom Komisije.
In addition, it is important to clarify that, where the assessment reveals areas in which the procedures in place are not sufficient to protect the financial interests of the Union, the Commission should be able to sign contribution agreements while taking appropriate supervisory measures.
Poleg tega je treba pojasniti, da bi Komisija morala imeti možnost da, kadar se v oceni razkrijejo področja, na katerih vzpostavljeni postopki ne zadoščajo za zaščito finančnih interesov Unije, podpiše sporazume o prispevkih, pri čemer sprejme ustrezne nadzorne ukrepe.
It is also important to clarify in which cases it is possible for the Commission to decide not to require an ex ante pillar assessment in order to sign contribution agreements.
Pomembno je tudi razjasniti, v katerih primerih lahko Komisija sprejme odločitev, da predhodnega stebrnega ocenjevanja pri podpisu sporazumov o prispevkih ne bo zahtevala.
Remuneration of persons and entities implementing the budget should, where relevant and possible, be performance-based.
Nadomestila osebam in subjektom, ki izvršujejo proračun, kadar je ustrezno in mogoče, temeljijo na smotrnosti.
The Commission enters into partnerships with third countries by means of financing agreements.
Komisija sklepa partnerstva s tretjimi državami na podlagi sporazumov o financiranju.
It is important to clarify the content of such financing agreements, in particular for those parts of an action that are implemented by the third country under indirect management.
Pomembno je pojasniti vsebino takšnih sporazumov o financiranju, zlasti za tiste dele, ki jih izvršuje tretja država v okviru posrednega upravljanja.
It is important to recognise the specific nature of blending facilities or platforms where the Commission blends its contribution with that of finance institutions and to clarify the application of the provisions on financial instruments and budgetary guarantees.
Treba je priznati posebno naravo mehanizmov mešanega financiranja ali platform, kadar Komisija kombinira svoje prispevke s prispevki finančnih institucij, in pojasniti uporabo določb o finančnih instrumentih in proračunskih jamstvih.
Procurement rules and principles applicable to public contracts awarded by Union institutions on their own account should be based on the rules set out in Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2014/24/EU.
Pravila in načela javnega naročanja, ki se uporabljajo za javna naročila, ki jih institucije Unije oddajo v lastnem imenu, bi morala temeljiti na pravilih iz Direktive 2014/23/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta in Direktive 2014/24/EU.
In the case of mixed contracts, the methodology of the contracting authorities for determining the applicable rules should be clarified.
Pri mešanih naročilih bi bilo treba pojasniti metodologijo javnih naročnikov za določanje pravil, ki se uporabljajo.
The ex ante and ex post publicity measures necessary to launch a procurement procedure should be clarified for contracts equal to or greater than the thresholds set out in Directive 2014/24/EU, for contracts below those thresholds and for contracts falling outside the scope of that Directive.
V zvezi z naročili, katerih vrednost je enaka ali višja od mejnih vrednosti, določenih v Direktivi 2014/24/EU, pa tudi v zvezi s tistimi, katerih vrednost je nižja ter v zvezi z naročili, ki ne spadajo na področje uporabe navedene direktive, bi bilo treba pojasniti predhodne in naknadne ukrepe za obveščanje javnosti, ki so potrebni za začetek postopka javnega naročanja.
This Regulation should include an exhaustive list of all the procurement procedures available to Union institutions regardless of the thresholds.
Ta uredba bi morala vključevati izčrpen seznam vseh postopkov javnega naročanja, ki so na voljo institucijam Unije, ne glede na mejne vrednosti.
In the interests of administrative simplification and in order to encourage the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), negotiated procedures for middle-value contracts should be provided for.
Zaradi upravne poenostavitve in spodbujanja sodelovanja malih in srednjih podjetij bi bilo treba zagotoviti postopke s pogajanji za javna naročila srednjih vrednosti.
As is the case in Directive 2014/24/EU, this Regulation should allow for market consultation prior to the launch of a procurement procedure.
V skladu z Direktivo 2014/24/EU bi morala ta uredba omogočati preverjanje trga pred začetkom postopka javnega naročanja.
In order to ensure that an innovation partnership is used only when the desired works, supplies and services do not exist on the market or as a near-to-market development activity, an obligation to carry out such preliminary market consultation before using an innovation partnership should be laid down in this Regulation.
Da se zagotovi uporaba partnerstva za inovacije samo, kadar potrebne gradnje, blaga in storitev še ne obstaja na trgu, ali da še ni prisotna kot razvojna dejavnost, ki je skoraj zrela za trg, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti obveznost, da se pred uporabo partnerstva za inovacije izvede takšno predhodno tržno posvetovanje.