natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 14(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 provides that the Council is to adopt a decision appointing the members of the panel on a proposal from the Commission.
Člen 14(3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1939 določa, da Svet sprejme sklep o imenovanju članov izbirne komisije na predlog Komisije.
The members of the selection panel should therefore be appointed,
Zato bi bilo treba imenovati člane izbirne komisije –
For the period of four years from 9 October 2018, the following persons shall be appointed members of the panel provided for in Article 14(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939:
Za člane komisije iz člena 14(3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1939 se za obdobje štirih let od 9. oktobra 2018 imenujejo naslednje osebe:
This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Commission Decision (EU) 2018/1276
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2018/1276
of 22 February 2018
z dne 22. februarja 2018
on SA.31149 (2012/C) — Germany
o zadevi SA.31149 (2012/C) – Nemčija
Alleged State aid to Ryanair
Domnevna državna pomoč družbi Ryanair
(notified under document C(2018) 1034)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2018) 1034)
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, zlasti člena 62(1)(a) Sporazuma,
By letter dated 10 July 2007 (‘the 2007 Opening Decision’), the Commission informed Germany of its decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) of the Treaty with regard to the financing of Lübeck airport, the financial relations between Hansestadt Lübeck and Infratil Limited (‘Infratil’), and the airport's financial relations with the airline Ryanair.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 10. julija 2007 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka iz leta 2007) Nemčijo obvestila, da se je v zvezi s financiranjem letališča Lübeck, finančnimi povezavami med mestom Lübeck in družbo Infratil Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Infratil) ter finančnimi povezavami letališča z družbo Ryanair odločila začeti postopek iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe.
The formal investigation procedure was registered under the case number SA.21877 (C 24/2007).
Formalni postopek preiskave je bil evidentiran pod zadevo št.
A Corrigendum of the 2007 Opening Decision was adopted on 24 October 2007.
SA.21877 (C 24/2007).
The Corrigendum was published on 7 December 2007.
Dne 28. januarja 2009 je Schutzgemeinschaft gegen Fluglärm Lübeck und Umgebung eV (v nadaljnjem besedilu: organizacija SGF) poslala pritožbo glede zadeve SA.21877, ki je bila evidentirana pod zadevo št.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question within one month of the publication date.
SA.27585.
On 28 January 2009, Schutzgemeinschaft gegen Fluglärm Lübeck und Umgebung eV (‘SGF’) sent a complaint regarding case SA.21877, registered under the case number SA.27585.
Organizacija SGF je 22. junija 2010 in 30. junija 2010 vložila dodatno pritožbo, v kateri trdi, da je Nemčija dodelila dodatno nezakonito državno pomoč družbama Flughafen Lübeck GmbH (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba FLG) in Infratil.
On 22 June 2010 and 30 June 2010, SGF submitted a further complaint, alleging that further unlawful State aid had been granted by Germany in favour of Flughafen Lübeck GmbH (‘FLG’) and Infratil.
Ta pritožba je bila evidentirana pod zadevo št.
By letter dated 22 February 2012 (‘the 2012 Opening Decision’), the Commission informed Germany of its decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) of the Treaty with regard to alleged State aid to FLG, Infratil, Ryanair, and other airlines using Lübeck airport.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 22. februarja 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka iz leta 2012) Nemčijo obvestila, da se je v zvezi z domnevno državno pomočjo družbam FLG, Infratil, Ryanair in drugim letalskim prevoznikom, ki uporabljajo letališče Lübeck, odločila začeti postopek iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe.
The 2012 Opening Decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 10 August 2012.
Komisija je leta 2014 združila postopke v zadevah SA.21877, SA.27585 in SA.31149.
The Commission joined the procedures SA.21877, SA.27585 and SA.31149 in 2014.
Navedeni sporazumi bodo zato ocenjeni v ločenem sklepu.
As to the potential State aid in favour of Ryanair, that Commission Decision only assessed an agreement concluded between the airport operator and Ryanair in 2000.
Komisija se v zvezi s postopki v zadevah SA.21877, SA.27585 in SA.31149 sklicuje na uvodne izjave od (1) do (61) Sklepa Komisije (EU) 2017/2336.
Those agreements therefore would be assessed in a separate decision.
Ozadje preiskave in okvir ukrepov
A request for information concerning two side letters concluded between FLG and Ryanair in 2010 and an Oxera report of 6 February 2015 was sent to Germany on 27 July 2017.
Dejstva v zvezi z letališčem in razvoj potniškega prometa
Germany requested an extension of the deadline to reply which the Commission granted on 2 August 2017.
Letališče Lübeck je približno 73 kilometrov oddaljeno od mesta Hamburg v zvezni deželi Schleswig-Holstein v Nemčiji.
The requested information was provided on 20 September 2017.
Letališče svoje zaledje opredeljuje kot metropolitansko območje mesta Hamburg in Öresund (širše območje mest København/Malmö).
On 22 September 2017, a request for information was sent to Ryanair and forwarded to Germany.
Tržna študija, ki jo je letališče izvedlo leta 2009, kaže, da je večina potnikov (na odhodnih letih) na letališče Lübeck prispela iz Hamburga (tj. 47,20 %).
Subsequently, information was submitted by Ryanair and Oxera on 6 October 2017.
Letališče Hamburg je od letališča Lübeck oddaljeno 78 kilometrov, približno 65 minut vožnje z avtomobilom.
On 24 October 2017, the Commission forwarded the documents received from Ryanair to Germany, inviting Germany to comment.
Do leta 2000 je bilo letališče Lübeck odvisno od prihodkov iz letalstva, ustvarjenih s čarterskimi leti in splošnim letalstvom.
The Commission refers to recitals 1 to 61 of Decision (EU) 2017/2336 as regards the procedure in cases SA.21877, SA.27585 and SA.31149.
Leta 2000 je letališče spremenilo svoj poslovni model v letališče za nizkocenovne prevoznike, kjer so se prihodki ustvarjali s kombinacijo letalskih in neletalskih dejavnosti.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURES
Od navedenega datuma je veliko večino letov na letališču Lübeck opravila družba Ryanair, ki je leta 2010 izvajala približno 90 % prometa.
Background of the investigation and context of the measures
Letališče Lübeck je prvotno upravljala družba FLG, ki je bila družba z omejeno odgovornostjo, njen edini delničar pa je bilo mesto Lübeck.
Airport facts and passenger development
Nov zasebni vlagatelj se je našel leta 2012.
Lübeck airport is situated approximately 73 kilometres from the City of Hamburg, in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
Lastništvo letališča se je v zadnjih letih večkrat spremenilo.
According to a market study carried out by the airport in 2009, the majority of the (outbound) passengers at Lübeck airport came from Hamburg (namely 47,20 %).
Na voljo niso ne redni ne čarterski leti.
Hamburg airport is located 78 kilometres from Lübeck airport, about 65 minutes travelling time by car.
Sporazum iz leta 2000
In 2000, the airport changed its business model to an airport for low-cost carriers where revenues are generated through a combination of aviation and non-aviation activities.
Predvideno je bilo, da bo sporazum iz leta 2000 veljal od 1. junija 2000 do 31. maja 2010.
From that date, the vast majority of the flights at Lübeck airport were undertaken by Ryanair which operated about 90 % of the traffic in 2010.
Za ruto do Stansteda je sporazum vključeval naslednje stroške in prihodke:
Lübeck airport was originally operated by FLG, which was a limited liability company, with Hansestadt Lübeck as its sole shareholder.
Preglednica 1
It was first privatised in 2005 but then bought back by Hansestadt Lübeck in 2009.
Stroški in prihodki, vključeni v sporazum iz leta 2000 z vidika družbe FLG
A public vote of the citizens of Hansestadt Lübeck ensured the survival of the airport in April 2010, approving further investments for the airport until a new private investor would enter the company.
< 18 obračanj na teden
A new private investor was found in 2012.
≥ 18 obračanj na teden
The ownership of the airport has changed several times in recent years.
Stroški družbe FLG:
The passenger traffic at the airport increased from 48652 passengers in 1999 to 697559 passengers in 2009.
Podpora za trženje – stroški na prispelega potnika
It gradually declined afterwards contrary to the expectations of the airport, which had expected passenger numbers to increase to 2,2 million by 2015.
EUR
At the date of this decision, no airline is operating from Lübeck airport.
Do 31. maja 2005
Neither scheduled nor charter flights are on offer.
Od 1. junija 2005
The 2000 Agreement
Prihodki družbe FLG:
FLG signed an Air Services Agreement (‘ASA’) with Ryanair in May 2000 (‘the 2000 Agreement’) that specified the airport charges payable by Ryanair as well as the marketing support payable by the airport.
Pristojbina, ki jo družba Ryanair plača na letalo
The 2000 Agreement was scheduled to start on 1 June 2000 and to continue until 31 May 2010.
Pristojbina, ki jo družba Ryanair plača na prispelega potnika
For the route to Stansted, the agreement included the following costs and revenues:
Čista pristojbina, ki jo družba Ryanair plača na prispelega potnika (pristojbina, zmanjšana za podporo za trženje)
Table 1
Drugo:
Costs and revenues involved in the 2000 Agreement from FLG's perspective
Pristojbina za promet na vozovnico, ki jo proda družba FLG
< 18 turnarounds per week
Provizija za promet iz najema vozil pri družbi FLG
≥ 18 turnarounds per week
Pristojbina za varnost (ki jo družba Ryanair plača ustreznemu vladnemu organu)
FLG costs:
Morebitna državna pomoč, ki jo je upravljavec letališča, družba FLG, dodelil družbi Ryanair
Marketing support — costs per arriving passenger
Družbi Ryanair in FLG sta marca in oktobra 2010 podpisali spremni pismi k sporazumu iz leta 2000 (v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj: sporazuma iz leta 2010 ali spremni pismi iz leta 2010).
EUR […]
To novo pristojbino za trženje je bilo treba plačati poleg pristojbine za trženje iz sporazuma iz leta 2000 v višini […] EUR na potnika (manj kot 18 obračanj na teden) ali […] EUR na potnika (več kot 18 obračanj na teden).
Until 31 May 2005
Ker je družba Ryanair opravila več kot 18 obračanj na teden, bi ji morala družba FLG v času trajanja sporazuma plačati skupno […] EUR.
From 1 June 2005
Ker so se ohranili vsi drugi pogoji iz sporazuma iz leta 2000, so pristojbine za potniške storitve na vsakega odhajajočega potnika, ki jih je bilo treba plačati družbi FLG, znašale […] EUR, stroški oskrbe na ploščadi na obračanje pa […] EUR.
FLG income:
Dne 31. oktobra 2010, po koncu pogodbenega obdobja iz spremnega pisma št. 1, je bilo podpisano drugo spremno pismo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: spremno pisno št. 2).
Ryanair payable fees per arriving passenger
Na dan, ko je bilo podpisano spremno pismo št. 1, namreč 29. marca 2010, je družba FLG podpisala tudi pogodbo o storitvah trženja z družbo Airport Marketing Services Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba AMS), podružnico v celotni lasti družbe Ryanair.
Ryanair net payable fees per arriving passenger (fees minus marketing support)
Navedena pogodba o storitvah trženja je zajemala obdobje od 29. marca 2010 do 30. oktobra 2010 in določala storitve oglaševanja, ki jih je družba AMS morala zagotoviti na spletni strani www.ryanair.com v zameno za plačilo […] EUR s strani družbe FLG.
Other:
Področje preiskave
Fee on turnover per ticket sold by FLG
Sporazum iz leta 2000 med družbama FLG in Ryanair je bil del Sklepa (EU) 2017/2336.
Commission on turnover rental car booked by FLG
Zato je ta sklep omejen na spremno pismo št. 1 in spremno pismo št. 2, sklenjeni leta 2010.
Security fee (paid by Ryanair to appropriate government body)
Razlogi za začetek postopka
Potential State aid granted by the airport operator FLG to Ryanair
Komisija je imela pomisleke, da je bila s sporazumoma iz leta 2010 družbi Ryanair dodeljena selektivna prednost, zaradi česar pomenita državno pomoč v smislu člena 107 Pogodbe.
In March and October 2010, Ryanair and FLG signed two side letters to the 2000 Agreement mentioned above (collectively, ‘the 2010 Agreements’ or ‘the 2010 Side Letters’).
PRIPOMBE NEMČIJE
The first side letter signed on 29 March 2010 (‘Side Letter No 1’) covered the period from 28 March 2010 until 30 October 2010.
Nemčija je menila, da sporazuma iz leta 2010 nista izkrivljala ali nista mogla izkrivljati konkurence in nista vplivala na trgovino med državami članicami, saj je letališče Lübeck majhno regionalno letališče ter ne konkurira letališču Hamburg in drugim letališčem.
It constitutes a prolongation of the 2000 Agreement, which would have ended in May 2010, and introduced a new marketing fee of EUR […] per passenger to be paid by FLG in return for a temporary marketing event organised by Ryanair.
Kar zadeva spremno pismo št. 1, je Nemčija trdila, da je bilo v skladu s tržnimi pogoji in da ni zagotovilo prednosti družbi Ryanair.
This new marketing fee had to be paid in addition to the marketing fee specified in the 2000 Agreement of EUR […] per passenger (below 18 turnarounds per week) or EUR […] per passenger (above 18 turnarounds per week).
S sklicevanjem na zadevo Helaba I je trdila, da prednost ne obstaja, če drugi upravljavci regionalnih letališč nudijo družbi Ryanair podobne pogoje.
Since more than 18 turnarounds per week were carried out by Ryanair, a total of EUR […] was to be paid by FLG to Ryanair for the duration of the agreement.
Poleg tega je trdila, da je bilo to dokazano s primerjalno analizo družbe Ryanair.
As all other conditions from the 2000 Agreement were maintained, passenger service fees per departing passenger to be paid to FLG amounted to EUR […] and ramp handling charges per turnaround amounted to EUR […].
Nemčija je trdila, da imajo nizkocenovni prevozniki, kot sta družbi Ryanair in Wizz Air, manj zahtev glede zemeljske oskrbe in infrastrukturnih storitev.
On 31 October 2010, after the end of the contract period of Side Letter No 1, a second side letter was signed (‘Side Letter No 2’).
Prvič, na letališču Lübeck je bilo potrebnih manj okenc za prijavo na let, saj se lahko potniki za let z družbo Ryanair prijavijo prek spleta.
Side Letter No 2 did not maintain the conditions of Side Letter No 1, but returned to the schedule of marketing payments as stated in the 2000 Agreement, extending its terms for three years until 1 November 2013.
Drugič, ni bilo avtobusov za potnike.
On the day that Side Letter No 1 was entered into, namely on 29 March 2010, FLG also signed a marketing services agreement with Airport Marketing Services Limited (‘AMS’), a fully-owned subsidiary of Ryanair.
Tretjič, ker so razdalje, ki jih je treba prehoditi na letališču Lübeck, manjše, so bila letala družbe Ryanair krajši čas na letališču.
That marketing services agreement covered the period from 29 March 2010 to 30 October 2010 and set out the advertising services to be provided by AMS on the website www.ryanair.com, in return for a sum of EUR […] to be paid by FLG.
Četrtič, ker ni bilo prestopnih letov, na potnika pa je bilo manj kosov prtljage, niso bili potrebni objekti v ta namen.
Scope of the investigation
Petič in zadnjič, ker letalska posadka pogosto poskrbi za čiščenje notranjosti letala, je bilo manjše povpraševanje po storitvah čiščenja letal.
The 2000 Agreement between FLG and Ryanair was part of Decision (EU) 2017/2336.
Kar zadeva spremno pismo št. 2, je Nemčija poudarila, da je ta sporazum predstavljal razširitev sporazuma iz leta 2000 in ni vseboval bistvenih sprememb.
Therefore, this Decision is limited to Side Letter No 1 and Side Letter No 2 concluded in 2010.
Menila je, da je bil sporazum iz leta 2000 v skladu s preskusom udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu.
Grounds for initiating the procedure
Poleg tega Nemčija meni, da domnevnih prednosti v korist družbe Ryanair ni mogoče pripisati državi zaradi sodbe v zadevi Stardust Marine.
The Commission was concerned that the 2010 Agreements conferred a selective advantage to Ryanair and therefore constituted State aid within the meaning of Article 107 of the Treaty.
Po navedbah Nemčije je družba FLG ravnala samostojno in ne pod vplivom države.
COMMENTS FROM GERMANY
Nemčija je navedla tudi, da družba FLG ni bila vključena v strukture javne uprave.
Germany took the view that the 2010 Agreements did not distort or threaten to distort competition and did not affect trade between Member States, since Lübeck airport was a small regional airport and since it was not in competition with Hamburg airport and other airports.
Poleg tega je Nemčija dejala, da je bil nadzor javnih organov nad upravljanjem družbe FLG omejen na letalstvo in zadeve s področja javnega interesa ter ni vključeval vodenja komercialnih poslov.
As regards Side Letter No 1, Germany submitted that it was in line with market conditions and did not entail an advantage for Ryanair.
PRIPOMBE ZAINTERESIRANIH STRANI
Germany argued with reference to the Helaba I case, that there was no advantage when other operators of regional airports offered Ryanair similar conditions.
Družba FLG je navedla, da se je o sporazumih pogajala samostojno, zato ukrepa ni mogoče pripisati Nemčiji.
Germany further argued that this was proven by Ryanair's comparator analysis.
Družba Ryanair je trdila, da sporazumov iz leta 2010 ni mogoče pripisati državi.
Germany argued that low-cost carriers, such as Ryanair and Wizz Air, have fewer demands with regards to ground handling services and infrastructure services.
Družba Ryanair je navedla, da je bila pogodba z družbo FLG sklenjena na podlagi gospodarskih vidikov.
Firstly, at Lübeck airport fewer check-in counters were needed because check-in with Ryanair is available to passengers online.
Letališče Lübeck je veljalo za uspešno delujoče letališče, sekundarno letališču Hamburg, in Lübeck sam je štel za dragoceno kulturno destinacijo.
Secondly, there were no passenger buses.
Čeprav družba Ryanair ni mogla posredovati poslovnega načrta, da bi utemeljila svojo odločitev o začetku opravljanja storitev na letališču Lübeck, je poudarila, da se takšen poslovni načrt običajno ne zahteva za zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu.
Thirdly, since walking distances are shorter at Lübeck airport, the time for Ryanair airplanes on the ground was shorter.
Družba Ryanair je pojasnila, da je prenehala opravljati storitve na letališču Lübeck zaradi poslovnih razlogov, med drugim zaradi povečanja stroškov in ker je bil donos manjši, kot je bilo pričakovano (zaradi gospodarske recesije).
Fourthly, there were no transfer flights and fewer pieces of luggage per person, which meant that there did not have to be facilities for such purposes.
Družba Ryanair je navedla, da so regionalna letališča v Uniji v težkem tržnem položaju.
As regards Side Letter No 2, Germany pointed out that this agreement was an extension, without substantial changes, of the 2000 Agreement.
Ker je za pogodbe z družbo Ryanair značilno, da obetajo veliko število potnikov, ti poslovni odnosi pogosto pripomorejo k večji prepoznavnosti letališča in privabijo druge letalske prevoznike kakor tudi trgovce na drobno in druge ponudnike storitev.
Germany took the view that the 2000 Agreement complied with the Market Economy Operator test.
Poleg tega je družba Ryanair navedla, da so obstajali trdni dokazi, da bi se z večjim številom potnikov povečali prihodki iz neletalskih dejavnosti.
Furthermore, Germany is of the opinion that the alleged advantages in favour of Ryanair could not be imputed to the State based on the ruling in Stardust Marine.
Družba Ryanair je trdila, da bi z vidika vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu vsaka poslovna ponudba običajno pomenila izboljšanje glede na takratne razmere, dokler pričakuje, da bodo mejne koristi presegale mejne stroške.
According to Germany, FLG acted with autonomy and without any exertion of influence by the State.
Poleg tega je zagovarjala stališče, da je treba upoštevati, da ima glede na svoj poslovni model in operativno učinkovitost znatno manjše potrebe kot drugi letalski prevozniki.
Germany stated that FLG was not integrated into the structures of the public administration.
Družba Ryanair je izvedla primerjavo med letališči primerljive velikosti in v primerljivem položaju kot letališče Lübeck.
In addition, Germany stated that the supervision by the public authorities of the management of FLG was limited to aviation and public remit matters and did not include business management activities.
Primerljiva letališča so Bournemouth, Grenoble, Knock, Maastricht, Nimes in Prestwick.
COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES
Primerjava pristojbin, ki jih je družba Ryanair plačevala na primerljivih letališčih, je pokazala, da so bili stroški, ki jih je družba Ryanair plačevala na letališču Lübeck, na splošno višji od povprečja na primerljivih letališčih tako na potnika kot na posamezno obračanje.
FLG stated that the measures were not imputable to Germany, since the agreements were negotiated by it autonomously.
Po navedbah družbe Oxera bi to veljalo tudi, če bi se pogodba o storitvah trženja z družbo AMS obravnavala skupaj s spremnima pismoma iz leta 2010, pri čemer so se upoštevali stroški, ne pa tudi prihodki, povezani z družbo AMS.
Ryanair argued that the 2010 Agreements were not imputable to the State.
Kar zadeva pogodbo o storitvah trženja z družbo AMS, je družba Ryanair trdila, da so take pogodbe obojestransko koristne zaradi priljubljenosti spletnega mesta družbe Ryanair in posledičnega povečanja mednarodnega priznanja, izgradnje blagovne znamke in potnikov, kar je bilo potrjeno z dodatnim poročilom družbe Oxera z dne 26. septembra 2014.
Furthermore, Ryanair argued that there was no selectivity, since the 2010 Agreements were merely short side letters extending the duration of the existing arrangements under the 2000 Agreement.
Družba Air Berlin je navedla, da rute družbe Ryanair z letališča Lübeck predstavljajo neposredno konkurenco tistim, ki jih ponuja družba Air Berlin na letališču Hamburg.
The only new element was a commercially negotiated adjustment to the marketing support.
To velja zlasti za destinacije London, Milano in Barcelona, saj tja letita oba letalska prevoznika.
Ryanair stated that the contract with FLG was entered into on the basis of economic considerations.
Družba Air Berlin je zagovarjala stališče, da je namen tržne strategije družbe Ryanair speljati potencialne stranke drugih prevoznikov, med drugim družbe Air Berlin.
Lübeck airport was seen as a viable secondary airport to Hamburg airport and Lübeck itself was regarded as a valuable cultural destination.
Zaradi nizkih cen družbe Ryanair so se stranke preselile z letališča Hamburg na letališče Lübeck.
Ryanair explained that its services from Lübeck airport were discontinued because of commercial considerations, including cost increases and a yield lower than anticipated (as a consequence of economic recession).
Morala je prenehati izvajati nekatere lete, ker jih je družba Ryanair vzporedno zagotavljala na letališču Lübeck.
Ryanair stated that regional airports in the Union are in a difficult market position.
Poleg tega je družba Air Berlin izrazila mnenje, da težko uvede nove destinacije z letališča Hamburg, dokler podobne destinacije nudi družba Ryanair z letališča Lübeck po pretirano nizkih cenah.
Therefore, airport revenues from both aeronautical and non-aeronautical activities had to be taken into consideration, which is referred to as the ‘single-till approach’.
Poleg tega je družba Air Berlin navedla, da je sporazum z družbo Ryanair mogoče pripisati Nemčiji.
Since contracts with Ryanair typically promise a large number of passengers, such business relations often help to raise the airport's recognisability and to attract other airlines as well as retail outlets and other service providers.
V skladu s statutom družbe FLG mora nadzorni svet dati soglasje za stroške, ki nastanejo zaradi uporabe letališča (12. odstavek statuta).