natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In line with Article 2(10)(i) the Commission analysed various factors and established, inter alia, that: (i) in light of the written contracts, there was a consistent mark-up charged by a related company in the PRC to the related traders abroad; (ii) those written contracts suggested that traders assumed the customer default risk; (iii) the main activity of the related traders, amounting to more than 95 % of their turnover, consisted of trading products other than the product concerned including trading activities with unrelated parties; (iv) traders were paying compensation for quality claims made by customers; (v) traders were paying sea freight and bank charges in export sales of the product concerned to the Union; (vi) the business licence of one of the related traders described its main activities as ‘wholesale on a fee or contract basis, e.g. commission agents’; (vii) based on the verified profit and loss sheet, the related traders' own profit covered relevant office expenditures; (viii) traders were not located at the premises or near the producers and kept their accounting records at their premises.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) analizirala več dejavnikov in med drugim ugotovila, da: (i) je glede na pisne pogodbe povezana družba v LRK povezanima trgovcema v tujini zaračunavala dosleden pribitek; (ii) iz teh pisnih pogodb izhaja, da sta ta trgovca prevzela tveganje neplačila strank; (iii) je glavna dejavnost povezanih trgovcev, ki je znašala več kot 95 % njunega prometa, zajemala trgovanje z drugimi izdelki, ne z zadevnim izdelkom, vključno s trgovalnimi dejavnostmi z nepovezanimi strankami; (iv) sta trgovca plačevala nadomestilo za reklamacije kakovosti, ki so jih vložile stranke; (v) sta trgovca plačevala stroške pomorskega prevoza in bančne stroške izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo; (vi) so bile v obrtnem dovoljenju enega od teh povezanih trgovcev glavne dejavnosti trgovca opisane kot „posredništvo pri veleprodaji za plačilo ali po pogodbi, npr. komisionarji“; (vii) je bilo na podlagi bilance stanja poslovnega izida potrjeno, da so se z dobičkom povezanih trgovcev krili vsi zadevni pisarniški izdatki; (viii) trgovca nista delovala v prostorih ali v bližini proizvajalcev in sta svoje računovodske evidence hranila v svojih prostorih.
Therefore, the Commission concluded that the related traders performed functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da sta povezana trgovca opravljala funkcije, podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
Consequently, the adjustments under Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation were maintained.
Zato so prilagoditve v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe ostale nespremenjene.
Following definitive disclosure, the party contested the finding that the two related traders in Hong Kong and Singapore and the exporting producer did not constitute a single economic entity.
Po dokončnem razkritju je stran je oporekala ugotovitvi, da povezana trgovca v Hongkongu in Singapurju ter proizvajalec izvoznik ne pomenijo enega samega gospodarskega subjekta.
They contested the elements listed above and did not find them relevant for determining that the functions of the two related traders in question are similar to those of commission-based agents.
Nasprotovala je zgoraj navedenim dejstvom in menila, da niso pomembni za določitev, da so funkcije obeh zadevnih povezanih trgovcev podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
The Commission considered that none of the arguments put forward by the party could lead to a different conclusion than the one reached in recital 42 above.
Komisija je menila, da nobena od trditev strani ne vodi do drugačne ugotovitve, kot je tista iz uvodne izjave 42.
Rather, the party confirmed in its submission the following facts:
Nasprotno, stran je v svojem dopisu potrdila naslednja dejstva:
the two traders retained a mark-up when buying from the related company in the PRC,
oba trgovca sta zadržala pribitek pri nabavi od povezane družbe v LRK;
more than 95 % of the related traders' turnover consisted of trading products other than the product concerned including trading activities with unrelated parties,
več kot 95 % prometa povezanih trgovcev je zajemalo trgovanje z drugimi izdelki, ne z zadevnim izdelkom, vključno s trgovalnimi dejavnostmi z nepovezanimi stranmi;
the two traders were paying compensation for quality claims made by customers and assumed sea freight and bank charges,
oba trgovca sta plačevala nadomestilo za reklamacije kakovosti, ki so jih vložile stranke, in krila stroške pomorskega prevoza ter bančne stroške;
the two traders were physically far from the exporting producer and kept their own accounting records,
oba trgovca sta bila fizično daleč od proizvajalca izvoznika in sta vodila lastne računovodske evidence;
the business licence of one of the related traders described its main activities as ‘wholesale on a fee or contract basis, e.g. commission agents’.
v obrtnem dovoljenju enega od teh povezanih trgovcev so bile njegove glavne dejavnosti opisane kot „posredništvo pri veleprodaji za plačilo ali po pogodbi, npr. komisionarji“.
In particular, the party did not contest the nature of the business activity as such and the fact that that activity description does not link specifically to the product concerned is in any case irrelevant,
Zlasti stran ni ugovarjala naravi poslovne dejavnosti, dejstvo, da opis te dejavnosti ni izrecno povezan z zadevnim izdelkom, pa v vsakem primeru ni pomembno;
the profit of the related traders covered relevant office expenditures.
zadevni pisarniški izdatki so se krili iz dobička povezanih trgovcev.
In addition, the investigation showed that Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da skupina Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co.
Ltd sells directly on third countries markets and on the Chinese domestic market.
Ltd prodaja neposredno na trgih tretjih držav in na kitajskem domačem trgu.
This confirms that the Shagang Group has its own sales department including for export sales.
To potrjuje, da ima skupina Shagang svoj prodajni oddelek, vključno z izvozom.
For the above reasons, the related traders in Hong Kong and Singapore act as agents working on a commission basis.
Iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov se povezana trgovca v Hongkongu in Singapurju štejeta kot zastopnika, ki delata na podlagi provizije.
Consequently, in line with the established case law, since no such commission or mark-up was applied on the normal value, the adjustment of the export price was warranted in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Ker se pri normalni vrednosti ni uporabila takšna provizija ali pribitek, je bila zato v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso prilagoditev izvozne cene utemeljena v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the export price, recitals 52 to 53 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb glede izvozne cene, se potrdita uvodni izjavi 52 in 53 C/2017/5512 začasne uredbe.
Recitals 54 to 56 of the provisional Regulation explain how the comparison between the normal value and the export price was made.
V uvodnih izjavah 54 do 56 začasne uredbe je pojasnjeno, kako je bila izvedena primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno.
The Shagang group contested the methodology for the VAT adjustment described in recital 56 of the provisional Regulation.
Skupina Shagang je ugovarjala metodologiji za prilagoditev DDV, kot je opisana v uvodni izjavi 56 začasne uredbe.
As the normal value is higher than the export price, the party claimed that the Commission should adjust the export price by the reported VAT lost amount.
Ker je normalna vrednost višja od izvozne cene, je stran trdila, da bi morala Komisija izvozno ceno prilagoditi glede na sporočeni izgubljeni znesek DDV.
In line with Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation, for the difference in the indirect taxation, in this case the VAT that is partially refunded with regard to export sales, the Commission could duly adjust only the normal value and not the export price.
V skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe lahko Komisija zaradi razlike v posredni obdavčitvi, v tem primeru DDV, ki se delno povrne za izvoz, ustrezno prilagodi samo normalno vrednost, ne pa izvozno ceno.
Recital 56 of the provisional Regulation is clarified as follows.
Uvodna izjava 56 začasne uredbe je pojasnjena v nadaljevanju.
The Commission took both normal values and export prices with VAT included and adjusted the normal value to match the VAT rate applicable on exports after reimbursement, where applicable.
Komisija je upoštevala normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene z vključenim DDV in prilagodila normalno vrednost, da ustreza stopnji DDV, ki se uporablja za izvoz po vračilu, kadar je bilo to primerno.
Following definitive disclosure the Shagang group contested again the methodology for the VAT adjustment described in recital 56 of the provisional Regulation.
Po dokončnem razkritju je skupina Shagang znova izpodbijala metodologijo za prilagoditev DDV, kot je opisana v uvodni izjavi 56 začasne uredbe.
According to the party Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation applies to the situation where the like product borne VAT on the domestic market, as opposed to products exported to the Union.
Po mnenju te strani se člen 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe uporablja za primere, v katerih breme DDV nosi podobni izdelek na domačem trgu, v nasprotju z izdelki, izvoženimi v Unijo.
The party repeated its claim that not the normal value but the export price should be adjusted and, alternatively, proposed adjusting the normal value by adding VAT, such VAT being calculated as per tonnage amount per product type.
Stran je ponovila svojo trditev, da bi bilo treba prilagoditi izvozno ceno, ne normalno vrednost, in namesto tega predlagala prilagoditev normalne vrednosti s prištetjem DDV, pri čemer se ta DDV izračuna za tonažo posamezne vrste izdelka.
The claim was rejected.
Trditev je bila zavrnjena.
The Commission considers that the methodology applied in its calculations is in line with the requirements of the basic Regulation as interpreted in case law.
Komisija meni, da je metodologija, uporabljena v njenih izračunih, v skladu z zahtevami iz osnovne uredbe, kot se razlaga v sodni praksi.
In the absence of any other comments concerning comparison, recitals 54 to 55 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed and recital 56, clarified.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb glede primerjave, se potrdita uvodni izjavi 54 in 55 začasne uredbe, uvodna izjava 56 pa pojasni.
The details of the dumping calculation were set out in recitals 57 to 61 of the provisional Regulation.
Podrobni podatki o izračunu dampinga so bili navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 57 do 61 začasne uredbe.
Following provisional disclosure the Shagang group claimed that dumping margin calculations should be conducted on a monthly basis due to the significant fluctuation of the iron ore price (61,9 % between December 2015 and August 2016 according to the source quoted), which affected the export price of the product concerned.
Po začasnem razkritju je skupina Shagang trdila, da bi bilo treba stopnjo dampinga izračunavati mesečno, in to zaradi precejšnjega nihanja cene železove rude (61,9 % med decembrom 2015 in avgustom 2016 glede na navedeni vir), ki je vplivalo na izvozno ceno zadevnega izdelka.
The Commission calculated the dumping margin by comparing the weighted normal value with the weighted average export price for the entire investigation period.
Komisija je stopnjo dampinga izračunala na podlagi primerjave tehtane normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno za celotno obdobje preiskave.
In the present case, export sales are not exclusively limited to a particular short period of the investigation period.
V tem primeru izvoz ni bil izključno omejen na določeno kratko obdobje v obdobju preiskave.
Any possible impact of the fluctuation of iron ore prices would be equally distributed throughout the investigation period.
Vsak morebitni vpliv nihanja cen železove rude bi bil enakomerno razporejen v celotnem obdobju preiskave.
Therefore, this would not justify any monthly calculations.
Zato to ne bi upravičilo mesečnih izračunov.
In addition, given the late stage at which the request was made, the different level of integration of exporting producers, that other sources point to a different fluctuation and that no other party raised similar concerns, the claim was rejected.
Poleg tega je bila trditev zavrnjena, ker je bil zahtevek vložen pozno, zaradi različnih ravni povezanosti proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ker so bila v drugih virih navedena drugačna nihanja in ker nobena druga stran ni izrazila podobnih pomislekov.
It is also noted that in the specific examples given by the party the price variation in the finished products was much lower than the fluctuation in iron ore prices in the period in question.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da so bile v primerih, ki jih je navedla stran, razlike v cenah končnih izdelkov precej nižje od nihanja cen železove rude v zadevnem obdobju.
Following definitive disclosure the Shagang group reiterated that dumping margin calculations should be conducted on a monthly basis.
Po dokončnem razkritju je skupina Shagang ponovila, da bi bilo treba stopnjo dampinga izračunavati mesečno.
The request was not accompanied by new elements that could justify monthly calculations, thus could not be accepted.
V zahtevku ni bilo novih dejstev, ki bi lahko upravičili mesečno izračunavanje, zato ga ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
Following the verification visits held at Duferco Deutschland GmbH and Duferco SA, certain information pertaining to sales and costs in the Union had to be revised.
Po preveritvenih obiskih v družbah Duferco Deutschland GmbH in Duferco SA je bilo treba nekatere informacije, ki se nanašajo na prodajo in stroške v Uniji, popraviti.
Following the above revision and the correction of a clerical error, the definitive dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Na podlagi navedenega pregleda in popravka stvarnih napak so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
Definitive dumping margin (%)
Dokončna stopnja dampinga (v %)
In the absence of any comments with respect to the definition of the Union industry and Union production the conclusions set out in recitals 62 to 64 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z opredelitvijo pojmov industrija Unije in proizvodnja Unije ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 62 do 64 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Union consumption figures were revised slightly downwards as a consequence of the correction to import volumes from the country concerned explained in recitals 64 to 66 below.
Podatki o potrošnji Unije so bili malce popravljeni navzdol zaradi popravka obsega uvoza iz zadevne države, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 64 do 66 v nadaljevanju.
On this basis, the Union free market consumption developed as follows:
Na podlagi tega se je potrošnja Unije na prostem trgu spreminjala, kot sledi:
Free market consumption (tonnes)
Potrošnja na prostem trgu (v tonah)
Source: Eurofer questionnaire reply and Eurostat statistics with correction of 15 %
Vir: izpolnjeni vprašalnik združenja Eurofer in statistični podatki Eurostata s popravkom v višini 15 %.
Free market consumption
Potrošnja na prostem trgu
During the period considered, the Union free market consumption increased by 25 %.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je potrošnja Unije na prostem trgu povečala za približno 25 %.
The increase was mainly due to an increase of demand in the major downstream industries.
To povečanje je bilo predvsem posledica večjega povpraševanja v velikih panogah na koncu proizvodne verige.
In the absence of further comments with respect to the Union consumption the conclusions set out in recitals 65 to 72 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nadaljnjih pripomb glede potrošnje Unije, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 65 do 72 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Volume, market share and price of the imports from the country concerned
Obseg, tržni delež in cene uvoza iz zadevne države
Following provisional disclosure, in a submission of 20 October 2017 Eurofer provided evidence, in the form of a market intelligence survey which covered all the major markets for CRS, that imports from the PRC were overestimated in the provisional Regulation by up to 15 % for the period considered.
Po začasnem razkritju je Eurofer v dopisu z dne 20. oktobra 2017 predložil dokaze v obliki tržne raziskave, ki je zajela vse večje trge vrst jekla, odpornih proti koroziji, da je bil uvoz iz LRK v začasni uredbi precenjen, in sicer za največ 15 % v obravnavanem obdobju.
Eurofer enquired its members, consisting of companies present in all major markets in the Union, about the magnitude of imports into the Union market of products which are not the product concerned but were declared under the same CN codes.
Eurofer je svoje člane, ki vključujejo družbe, navzoče na vseh glavnih trgih v Uniji, vprašal o obsegu uvoza izdelkov, ki niso zadevni izdelek, a so uvrščeni pod iste oznake KN, na trg Unije.
All of the complainants agreed with the methodology employed and the conclusions reached: to the best estimate 15 % of Chinese imports were to be considered non-product-concerned.
Vsi pritožniki so se strinjali z uporabljeno metodologijo in ugotovljenimi sklepi: po najboljših ocenah naj se 15 % kitajskega uvoza ne bi štelo za zadevni izdelek.
There was no evidence that this affected imports from other countries.
Ni bilo dokazov, da bi to vplivalo na uvoz iz drugih držav.
CISA also pointed out in a submission that importation statistics of CRS could be overstated.
Združenje CISA je v dopisu poudarilo še, da bi bili lahko statistični podatki o uvozu vrst jekla, odpornih proti koroziji, precenjeni.
At provisional stage the Commission did not have enough evidence on file to conclude, that imports were overstated, or the extent of it, as discussed in recital 74 of the provisional Regulation.
Komisija v začasni fazi ni imela dovolj dokazov v spisu, da bi lahko sklenila, da je bil uvoz precenjen oziroma v kolikšni meri, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 74 začasne uredbe.
In the light of the new evidence on file, the Commission accepted the claim as justified and applied a correction of 15 % to the imports of the PRC.
Glede na nove dokaze v spisu je Komisija trditev sprejela kot utemeljeno in uporabila popravek v višini 15 % na uvoz iz LRK.
The Commission considered the correction of 15 % as reasonable as it represented an adequate estimate based on a thorough analysis of the import market.
Po mnenju Komisije je popravek v višini 15 % sprejemljiv, saj pomeni ustrezno oceno na podlagi temeljite analize uvoznega trga.
The Commission also took into account confidential statistical data which was collected during the definitive stage of the investigation which again confirmed that not all imports under the above-mentioned CN codes were the product concerned.
Komisija je upoštevala tudi zaupne statistične podatke, zbrane v zaključni fazi preiskave, ki so znova potrdili, da vsi uvoženi izdelki pod navedenimi oznakami KN niso bili zadevni izdelek.
Parties were informed of the correction and given an opportunity to express their views.
Strani so bile obveščene o popravku in dana jim je bila možnost, da izrazijo svoje mnenje.
Accordingly, imports into the Union from the PRC developed as follows:
Glede na navedeno se je uvoz iz LRK v Unijo spreminjal, kot sledi:
Source: Eurostat statistics with correction of 15 %
Vir: statistični podatki Eurostata s popravkom v višini 15 %.
Volume of imports from the PRC
Obdobje preiskave Obseg uvoza iz LRK
The above table shows that in absolute figures imports from the PRC increased by 146 % during the period considered.
Iz zgornje preglednice je razvidno, da se je absolutna vrednost uvoza iz LRK v obravnavanem obdobju povečala za 146 %.
In parallel, the total market share of the dumped imports into the Union increased by 9,8 percentage points during the period considered.
Hkrati se je celotni tržni delež dampinškega uvoza v Unijo v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 9,8 odstotne točke.
The corrected import statistics continue to demonstrate a major increase in imports in both absolute terms and in terms of market share.
Popravljeni statistični podatki o uvozu še vedno kažejo na precejšnje povečanje uvoza v absolutnem smislu in v smislu tržnega deleža.
In fact even if no correction was made to the imports in 2013-2015 a simulation showed that import volumes would increase by 109 % and market share by 70 %.
Pravzaprav simulacije kažejo, da bi se obseg uvoza povečal za 109 %, tržni delež pa za 70 % tudi brez popravka uvoza v obdobju 2013–2015.
With regard to the undercutting, the CIF import value of two of the three sampled exporting producers were recalculated following verification visits to related importers.
Ob upoštevanju nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen so bile uvozne vrednosti CIF dveh od treh vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov znova izračunane po preveritvenih obiskih povezanih uvoznikov.
Revisions to these CIF values were also made following comments received from an exporting producer after the provisional disclosure (as explained in Section 2.2 above).
Popravki teh vrednosti CIF so bili izvedeni tudi na podlagi pripomb proizvajalca izvoznika po začasnem razkritju (kot je pojasnjeno v oddelku 2.2 zgoraj).
The definitive undercutting margins have thus been revised and amount to 8,1 % to 15,1 % for the PRC.
Dokončne stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen so bile zato popravljene in znašajo od 8,1 % do 15,1 % za LRK.
In the absence of any further comments with respect to imports from the country concerned, the rest of the conclusions set out in recitals 73 to 81 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z uvozom iz zadevne države, se preostale ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 73 do 81 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One interested party claimed that their rights of defence are breached because of the use of indexed figures for the microeconomic indicators.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da so njene pravice do obrambe kršene zaradi uporabe indeksiranih podatkov za mikroekonomske kazalnike.
Indexing was used, as explained in the provisional Regulation, to protect the confidentiality of the sampled Union producers which come from two groups.
Kot je pojasnjeno v začasni uredbi, je bila indeksacija uporabljena za zaščito zaupnosti vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, ki prihajajo iz dveh skupin.
The interested party was provided with additional information that could be disclosed in ranges without jeopardising the confidential treatment.
Zainteresirani strani so bile zagotovljene dodatne informacije, ki bi jih bilo mogoče razkriti v razponih brez ogrožanja zaupne obravnave.
In any event, indexing is considered an appropriate approach because it protected the confidentiality of data but also provides meaningful information to interested parties.
V vsakem primeru se indeksiranje šteje za ustrezen pristop, saj se z njim zaščiti zaupnost podatkov in se hkrati zainteresiranim stranem zagotovijo pomembne informacije.
In addition this approach was only used to the extent necessary, namely only for the microeconomic indicators.
Poleg tega je bil ta pristop uporabljen le v nujno potrebnem obsegu, in sicer le za mikroekonomske kazalnike.
The Commission therefore rejects this claim.
Komisija zato to trditev zavrača.
In its response to the definitive disclosure the interested party concerned (CISA) contested the form of the micro economic data disclosed.
Zadevna zainteresirana stran (CISA) je v svojem odgovoru na dokončno razkritje oporekala obliki razkritih mikroekonomskih podatkov.
CISA stated that it continues to not understand why the micro economic data is confidential because it relates to the four sampled Union producers.
Združenje CISA je navedlo, da še vedno ne razume, zakaj so mikroekonomski podatki zaupni, saj se nanašajo na štiri vzorčene proizvajalce Unije.