natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finally, City Cycle submitted that certain invoices dated outside the reporting period and/or invoices that were reported without date or with an incorrect format should be disregarded from the calculations.
Nazadnje, družba City Cycle je navedla, da se nekateri računi, izdani izven obdobja poročanja, in/ali računi brez navedenega datuma ali v napačnem formatu, ne bi smeli upoštevati pri izračunih.
These claims have been reiterated after the additional disclosure without providing any additional elements in this regard.
Ta trditev je bila ponovljena po dodatnem razkritju brez navedbe kakršnih koli dodatnih elementov v zvezi s tem.
Concerning the methodology, it is clarified that the 60/40 test was carried out not only based on the data provided on semi-finished products in table F.2 of the exemption form but also on the reported manufacturing costs of the bicycle parts claimed to be manufactured by City Cycle.
Glede metodologije je treba pojasniti, da je bil preskus 60/40 izveden ne le na podlagi podatkov o polizdelkih v razpredelnici F.2 iz obrazca za izvzetje, temveč tudi na podlagi sporočenih proizvodnih stroškov delov za kolesa, ki naj bi jih izdelala družba City Cycle.
Furthermore, the 25 % value added test was carried out on the cost of processing from semi-finished goods, meaning the assembly cost for bicycles in table F.4.2 of the exemption form.
Poleg tega je bil preskus 25-odstotne dodane vrednosti izveden v zvezi s stroški obdelave iz polizdelkov, tj. stroški za sestavljanje koles v razpredelnici F.4.2 iz obrazca za izvzetje.
Moreover, since City Cycle did not provide a split of bicycle parts sourced from the PRC and the ones not sourced from the PRC in table F.4.2 as requested, the Commission took this data from table F.2.
Ker družba City Cycle v razpredelnici F.4.2 prav tako ni navedla razdelitve na dele za kolesa, pridobljene iz LRK in tiste, ki niso bili pridobljeni iz LRK, kakor je bilo zahtevano, je Komisija pridobila te podatke iz razpredelnice F.2.
Concerning the comment regarding the use of the allocation method, the Commission notes that the data obtained based on this methodology could not be reconciled with the audited accounts.
Kar zadeva pripombe v zvezi z uporabo metode razdelitve, Komisija ugotavlja, da podatkov, pridobljenih na podlagi te metodologije, ni bilo mogoče uskladiti z revidiranimi računovodskimi izkazi.
During the on-spot verification this inconsistency was highlighted to City Cycle.
Med preverjanjem na kraju samem je bila družba City Cycle na to neskladnost opozorjena.
City Cycle did not use any accounting software, and accounting was made on paper and in excel worksheets.
Družba City Cycle ni uporabljala nikakršne računovodske programske opreme, računovodstvo pa se je izvajalo na papirju in z delovnimi listi v programu Excel.
The company had no system in place to monitor the origin of the imported parts, and it could only be identified whether specific parts were sourced locally or imported.
Podjetje ni imelo sistema za spremljanje porekla uvoženih delov in ugotoviti je bilo mogoče le, ali so posamezni deli lokalno proizvedeni ali uvoženi.
In addition, the company acknowledged that it did not keep track in its accounts of the origin of the parts purchased.
Poleg tega je družba priznala, da v svojih računovodskih izkazih ni spremljala porekla nabavljenih delov.
Therefore, in order to report data according to origin as requested in the exemption form, City Cycle used an allocation key based on sales of bicycles.
Zato za sporočanje podatkov, ločenih glede na poreklo, kot je zahtevano v obrazcu zahtevka za izvzetje, družba City Cycle uporablja razdelitveni ključ na podlagi prodaje koles.
However, the allocation method applied by City Cycle could not be reconciled with the audited accounts and the company itself admitted that the figures provided in this regard were wrong.
Vendar metode razdelitve, ki jo uporablja družba City Cycle, ni bilo mogoče uskladiti z revidiranimi računovodskimi izkazi in družba sama je priznala, da v zvezi s tem predloženi podatki niso bili točni.
Therefore, the arguments with regard to the use of the allocation method were rejected and therefore also the data provided based on this methodology as it was found to contradict the audited accounts and the Commission used instead the necessary data provided in other tables of the exemption form.
Zato so bile trditve v zvezi z uporabo metode razdelitve zavrnjene in s tem tudi predloženi podatki, ki so temeljili na tej metodologiji, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da so v nasprotju z revidiranimi računovodskimi izkazi, Komisija pa je namesto tega uporabila potrebne podatke iz drugih razpredelnic na obrazcu za izvzetje.
Finally, regarding the invoices mentioned in recital (34), the Commission found the request reasonable and disregard them for the calculation of 60/40 and 25 % value added tests.
Nazadnje, kar zadeva račune, navedene v uvodni izjavi (34), je Komisija ugotovila, da je zahteva razumna in jih ni upoštevala pri izračunu preskusov 60/40 in 25-odstotne dodane vrednosti.
It was established that this had no impact on the result, i.e. the raw materials (bicycle parts) from China still constituted more than 60 % of the total value of the parts of the assembled product, while the value added to the parts brought in during the assembly operation, was still lower than 25 % of the manufacturing cost.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da to ni vplivalo na rezultat, tj. surovine (deli za kolesa) iz Kitajske so še vedno predstavljali več kot 60 % celotne vrednosti delov sestavljenega izdelka, medtem ko je bila dodana vrednost, za katero se je povečala vrednost delov, vnesenih med sestavljanjem, še vedno manjša od 25 % proizvodnih stroškov.
After the additional disclosure, City Cycle claim that the Commission did not take into account that fact that City Cycle has historically been a producer of bicycles from Sri Lanka's domestic market and is operating under the control of Sir Lanka's customs administration.
Po dodatnem razkritju je družba City Cycle trdila, da Komisija ni upoštevala dejstva, da je družba City Cycle že precej časa proizvajalka koles na šrilanškem domačem trgu in deluje pod nadzorom šrilanške carinske uprave.
This claim is rejected as it is irrelevant for the purpose of this assessment as the analysis is carried out pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
Ta trditev se zavrne, saj ni pomembna za namene te ocene, ker se analiza izvaja v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, all the claims related to the methodology used by the Commission in carrying out the 60/40 and 25 % value added tests pursuant to Article 13(2)(b) of the basic Regulation were rejected.
Zato so bile vse trditve v zvezi z metodologijo, ki jo je uporabila Komisija pri izvedbi preskusov 60/40 in 25-odstotne dodane vrednosti na podlagi člena 13(2)(b) osnovne uredbe, zavrnjene.
Due to the company's insufficient cooperation and inability to demonstrate that it did not circumvent the measures on the basis of its own data, the exemption request of City Cycle under Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation could not be considered warranted.
Ker družba ni sodelovala v zadostni meri in na podlagi svojih lastnih podatkov ni mogla dokazati, da se ni izogibala ukrepom, zahtevka za izvzetje družbe City Cycle v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče šteti za upravičenega.
The Commission received submissions from City Cycle and the Union industry.
Komisija je prejela pripombe družbe City Cycle in industrije Unije.
City Cycle claimed that the Commission could not change its findings regarding assembly operations as the contested Regulation found that the existence of assembly operations was not established in Sri Lanka and this point was not challenged before the courts.
Družba City Cycle je trdila, da Komisija ne more spremeniti svojih ugotovitev glede dejavnosti sestavljanja, saj je bilo v izpodbijani uredbi ugotovljeno, da obstoj dejavnosti sestavljanja na Šrilanki ni potrjen, in ta točka pred sodišči ni bila izpodbijana.
This claim was reiterated after disclosure.
Ta trditev je bila ponovljena po razkritju.
For the reasons explained above, this claim should be rejected.
Kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, bi bilo treba to trditev zavrniti.
It is noted that the company's own data, communicated by the company itself, and its shortcomings in particular, made it impossible to positively establish that City Cycle was a genuine producer or that its assembly operations did not constitute circumvention practice.
Opozoriti je treba, da iz podatkov, ki jih je sporočila družba sama, in zlasti zaradi njihovih pomanjkljivosti ni bilo mogoče pozitivno dokazati, da je bila družba City Cycle dejanski proizvajalec ali da njene dejavnosti sestavljanja ne pomenijo prakse izogibanja.
As a result, the company could not be exempted from the anti-circumvention duties.
Zato družbe ni mogoče izvzeti iz dajatev proti izogibanju.
The company's own data, however, demonstrated that that the raw materials (bicycle parts) from China constituted more than 60 % of the total value of the parts of the assembled product, while the value added to the parts brought in during the assembly operation, was lower than 25 % of the manufacturing cost.
Podatki družbe same pa so pokazali, da so surovine (deli za kolesa) iz Kitajske predstavljali več kot 60 % celotne vrednosti delov sestavljenega izdelka, medtem ko je bila dodana vrednost, za katero se je povečala vrednost delov, vnesenih med sestavljanjem, še vedno manjša od 25 % proizvodnih stroškov.
In the context of high level of non-cooperation, this evidence could be taken to show the existence of circumvention practices in the country.
Glede na visoko raven nesodelovanja bi se lahko na podlagi teh dokazov sklepalo o obstoju praks izogibanja v državi.
City Cycle also claimed that the Commission could not reopen the investigation with a notice with a view to readopting a final Regulation or amending the contested Regulation as Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation provides that the Commission can only initiate an anti-circumvention investigation through a Commission Regulation.
Družba City Cycle je trdila tudi, da Komisija ne more ponovno začeti preiskave z obvestilom z namenom ponovnega sprejetja dokončne uredbe ali spremembe izpodbijane uredbe, saj člen 13(3) osnovne uredbe določa, da lahko Komisija začne preiskavo proti izogibanju le z uredbo Komisije.
Furthermore, it claimed that the fact that the Commission considers that the complete proceeding has not been annulled by the courts does not dispense it from adopting a formal Regulation.
Poleg tega je trdila, da dejstvo, da Komisija meni, da sodišča niso za ničnega razglasila celotnega postopka, ne pomeni, da ji ni treba sprejeti formalne uredbe.
In particular, City Cycle claimed that the reopening of the anti-circumvention investigation through a Notice would limit its rights to an effective judicial protection.
Zlasti je družba City Cycle trdila, da bi ponovni začetek preiskave proti izogibanju na podlagi obvestila omejil njeno pravico do učinkovitega sodnega varstva.
This argument was rejected, as the Notice is simply a preparatory act and City Cycle can exercise its rights to an effective judicial protection against this regulation.
Ta trditev je bila zavrnjena, saj je obvestilo zgolj pripravljalni akt in družba City Cycle lahko uveljavlja svoje pravice do učinkovitega sodnega varstva zoper to uredbo.
It should also be noted that the Commission did not initiate a new investigation, but merely re-opened the investigation that led to the adoption of the anti-circumvention measures in order to correct the irregularities identified by the Court of Justice in its judgment in the context of that investigation.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da Komisija ni začela nove preiskave, temveč je le ponovno začela preiskavo, ki je privedla do sprejetja ukrepov proti izogibanju za odpravo nepravilnosti, ki jih je Sodišče ugotovilo v sodbi v okviru navedene preiskave.
Furthermore, City Cycle claimed that the registration of imports of its bicycles is based on an error of fact and flawed reasoning as the assembly practices of City Cycle were not confirmed in the contested Regulation.
Poleg tega je družba City Cycle trdila, da registracija uvoza njenih koles temelji na napačno ugotovljenem dejanskem stanju in napačnem sklepanju, saj dejavnosti sestavljanja družbe City Cycle niso bile potrjene v izpodbijani uredbi.
Therefore, it claimed that the conditions for adopting the Registration Regulation were not met.
Zato je trdila, da pogoji za sprejetje uredbe o registraciji niso bili izpolnjeni.
However, as explained in recital (24) above, the reopening of the investigation confirmed that evidence at company level relating to the period of the investigation that led to the extension of the measures in 2013 demonstrated the existence of circumvention practices already.
Vendar, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (24), je bilo v ponovnem začetku preiskave potrjeno, da so dokazi na ravni družbe, ki se nanašajo na obdobje preiskave, ki je privedla do razširitve ukrepov leta 2013, že pokazali na obstoj praks izogibanja.
In addition, in light of the specific nature of the anti-circumvention instrument, which is designed to protect the effectiveness of the anti-dumping instrument, the registration of imports is a standard means to enhance such effectiveness.
Poleg tega je glede na posebno naravo instrumenta za preprečevanje izogibanja, katerega namen je zaščita učinkovitosti protidampinškega instrumenta, registracija uvoza običajen način za izboljšanje te učinkovitosti.
Therefore, City Cycle's claim that the conditions for adopting the Registration Regulation were not met was rejected.
Zato je bila trditev družbe City Cycle, da pogoji za sprejetje uredbe o registraciji niso bili izpolnjeni, zavrnjena.
Moreover, City Cycle asked the Commission to repeal the anti-circumvention duties imposed on Sri Lankan imports of bicycles, including those of City Cycle.
Poleg tega je družba City Cycle pozvala Komisijo k razveljaviti dajatev proti izogibanju, uvedenih na uvoz koles iz Šrilanke, tudi koles družbe City Cycle.
In this regard it should be noted that City Cycle did not specify on which legal basis the Commission should repeal the anti-circumvention measures on Sri Lankan imports of bicycles.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da družba City Cycle ni pojasnila, na kateri pravni podlagi bi morala Komisija razveljaviti ukrepe proti izogibanju za uvoz koles iz Šrilanke.
As stated in recitals (3) and (4), the judgement did not annul the contested Regulation as a whole, but only as concerns City Cycle.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (3) in (4), s sodbo ni bila za nično razglašena izpodbijana uredba v celoti, temveč le njen del, ki se nanaša na družbo City Cycle.
Therefore, this request was rejected.
Ta zahteva je bila zato zavrnjena.
This claim was reiterated after the additional disclosure.
Zato je ukrep o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve le pomožni ukrep glede na prvotni akt, s katerim je bila uvedena ta dajatev, ki varuje učinkovito izvajanje dokončnih ukrepov.
Under the consistent case-law of the Court of Justice, the sole purpose of a regulation extending an anti-dumping duty is to ensure the effectiveness of that duty and to prevent its circumvention.
Protidampinški ukrepi so bili razširjeni med drugim na izvoz družbe City Cycle iz Šrilanke na trg Unije po preiskavi proti izogibanju ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz koles s poreklom iz LRK v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (2) te uredbe.
Consequently, a measure extending a definitive anti-dumping duty is merely ancillary to the initial act establishing that duty which protects the effective application of the definitive measures.
Zato bodo ukrepi proti izogibanju, uvedeni z izpodbijano uredbo, veljali, dokler bodo veljali prvotni ukrepi o uvozu koles iz LRK.
Anti-dumping measures were extended, inter alia, to City Cycle's exports from Sri Lanka to the Union market following an anti-circumvention investigation of the measures imposed on imports of bicycles originating in the PRC pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation as stated in recital (2) of this Regulation.
Zato se trditev, da Komisija ne more uvesti ukrepov za izvoz družbe City Cycle iz Šrilanke v Unijo po 28. maju 2018 zavrne, ker temelji na napačni razlagi člena 13 osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, the anti-circumvention measures imposed by the contested Regulation will remain in force as long as the original measures on imports of bicycles from the PRC are in force.
Poleg tega je družba City Cycle po dodatnem razkritju trdila, da Komisija ne more podaljšati dajatev proti izogibanju za nedoločen čas brez ponovne preučitve praks izogibanja izvoznikov, medtem ko se dampinške prakse kitajskih izvoznikov ponovno ocenijo vsakih pet let.
Therefore, the claim that the Commission cannot impose measures on City Cycle's export from Sri Lanka to the Union beyond 28 May 2018 is rejected as it is based on a misinterpretation of Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
To trditev bi bilo treba zavrniti, saj temelji na napačni razlagi členov 11 in 13 osnovne uredbe.
In addition, after the additional disclosure City Cycle claimed that the Commission cannot indefinitely prolong circumvention duties without a fresh re-examination of the exporters' circumvention practices, while the dumping practices of the Chinese exporters are reassessed every five years.
Komisija ponovno oceni veljavne protidampinške ukrepe na zahtevo, ki jo predloži industrija Unije.
This claim should be rejected as it is based on a misunderstanding of Articles 11 and 13 of the basic Regulation.
Če take zahteve ni, veljavni protidampinški ukrepi potečejo ob koncu petletnega obdobja.
The Commission reassess the anti-dumping measures in force following a request lodged by the Union industry.
Poleg tega, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (53), ukrepi proti izogibanju ostanejo v veljavi, dokler veljajo prvotni ukrepi.
In the absence of such a request, the anti-dumping measures in force expire at the end of the five years term.
Vendar se lahko na zahtevo družb, za katere ti ukrepi veljajo, tudi ukrepi proti izogibanju ponovno ocenijo.
In addition, as explained in recital (53), the anti-circumvention measures remain in force as long as the original measures are in force.
D. RAZKRITJE
However, the anti-circumvention measures in place can also be re-assessed following a request from the companies subject to anti-circumvention measures.
Stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih naj bi se ponovno uvedla dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz koles, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirana kot izdelek s poreklom iz Šrilanke ali ne, s strani družbe City Cycle.
D. DISCLOSURE
Odobren jim je bil tudi rok za predložitev stališč po tem razkritju.
The parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to re-impose definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles whether declared as originating in Sri Lanka or not from City Cycle.
Pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile stranke, so bile obravnavane in, kjer je bilo to primerno, upoštevane.
They were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
E. UVEDBA UKREPOV
The written arguments submitted by the parties were considered and, where appropriate, were taken into account.
Na podlagi navedenega se šteje za primerno, da se prvotni ukrepi ponovno razširijo na uvoz dvokoles in drugih podobnih koles (vključno z dostavnimi tricikli, a brez enokolesnikov), brez motornega pogona, poslanih iz Šrilanke, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirana kot izdelek s poreklom iz Šrilanke ali ne, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex87120030 in ex87120070 (oznaki TARIC 8712003010 in 8712007091), s strani družbe City Cycle Industries.
E. IMPOSITION OF MEASURES
Glede na posebno naravo instrumenta za preprečevanje izogibanja, katerega namen je zaščita učinkovitosti protidampinškega instrumenta, in glede na to, da je preiskava razkrila dokaze, ki kažejo na obstoj praks izogibanja na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je sporočila družba sama, Komisija meni, da je primerno ponovno uvesti ukrepe od datuma registracije.
On the basis of the above, it is considered appropriate to re-extend the original measures to imports of bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles, but excluding unicycles), not motorised, consigned from Sri Lanka whether declared as originating in Sri Lanka or not, currently falling within CN codes ex87120030 and ex87120070 (TARIC codes 8712003010 and 8712007091) from City Cycle Industries.
Ta uredba je v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 –
In light of the specific nature of the anti-circumvention instrument, which is designed to protect the effectiveness of the anti-dumping instrument, and in view of the fact that the investigation has revealed evidence that points to the existence of the circumventing practices based on the company's own reported data, the Commission considers it appropriate to re-impose measures as from the date of the registration.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
This Regulation is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz dvokoles in drugih podobnih koles (vključno z dostavnimi tricikli, a brez enokolesnikov), brez motornega pogona, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se razširi na uvoz dvokoles in drugih podobnih koles (vključno z dostavnimi tricikli, a brez enokolesnikov), brez motornega pogona, poslanih iz Šrilanke, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirana kot izdelek s poreklom iz Šrilanke ali ne, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex87120030 in ex87120070 (oznaki TARIC 8712003010 in 8712007091), s strani družbe City Cycle Industries (dodatna oznaka TARIC B131).
Article 1
Dajatev, uvedena z odstavkom 1 tega člena, se pobira za uvoz, poslan iz Šrilanke, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Šrilanke ali ne, ki je registriran v skladu s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/678.
A definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles, but excluding unicycles), not motorised, originating in the People's Republic of China, is hereby extended to imports of bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles, but excluding unicycles), not motorised, consigned from Sri Lanka whether declared as originating in Sri Lanka or not, currently falling within CN codes ex87120030 and ex87120070 (TARIC codes 8712003010 and 8712007091) from City Cycle Industries (TARIC additional code B131).
Člen 2
The duty imposed by paragraph 1 of this Article shall be collected on imports consigned from Sri Lanka, whether declared as originating in Sri Lanka or not, registered in accordance with Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/678.
Carinskim organom se odredi, da ustavijo registracijo uvoza, ki je bila določena v skladu s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/678.
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports, established in accordance with Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/678.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 9. januarja 2018
The President
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 990/2011 z dne 3. oktobra 2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL L 261, 6.10.2011, str. 2).
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 501/2013 z dne 29. maja 2013 o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 990/2011 na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz koles, poslanih iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije ali ne (UL L 153, 5.6.2013, str. 1).