natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When assessing double criminality, the competent authority of the executing State should verify whether the factual elements underlying the criminal offence in question, as reflected in the freezing certificate or confiscation certificate submitted by the competent authority of the issuing State, would also, per se, be subject to a criminal penalty in the executing State if they were present in that State at the time of the decision on the recognition of the freezing order or confiscation order.
Pristojni organ države izvršiteljice bi moral pri presoji dvojne kaznivosti preveriti, ali bi bila za dejanske elemente zadevnega kaznivega dejanja, kot so predstavljeni v potrdilu o začasnem zavarovanju ali potrdilu o odvzemu, ki ga predloži pristojni organ države izdajateljice, predpisana kazenska sankcija tudi v državi izvršiteljici, če bi se zgodili v tej državi v času odločitve o priznanju sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu.
The issuing authority should ensure that, when issuing a freezing order or confiscation order, the principles of necessity and proportionality are respected.
Organ izdajatelj bi moral zagotoviti, da sta ob izdaji sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu spoštovani načeli nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
Under this Regulation, a freezing order or confiscation order should only be issued and transmitted to an executing authority in another Member State where it could have been issued and used in a solely domestic case.
V skladu s to uredbo bi moral biti sklep o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklep o odvzemu izdan in posredovan izvršitvenemu organu v drugi državi članici samo, kadar bi ga bilo mogoče izdati in uporabljati izključno v nacionalnem primeru.
The issuing authority should be responsible for assessing the necessity and proportionality of such orders in each case as the recognition and execution of freezing orders and confiscation orders should not be refused on grounds other than those provided for in this Regulation.
Organ izdajatelj bi moral v vsakem posameznem primeru oceniti, ali so takšni sklepi nujni in sorazmerni, saj se priznanje in izvršitev sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju oziroma sklepa o odvzemu ne bi smela zavrniti iz razlogov, ki niso določeni v tej uredbi.
In some cases, a freezing order may be issued by an authority, designated by the issuing State, which is competent in criminal matters to issue or execute the freezing order in accordance with national law, and which is not a judge, court or public prosecutor.
V določenih primerih lahko sklep o začasnem zavarovanju izda organ, ki ga imenuje država izdajateljica in je v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pristojen, da v kazenskih zadevah izda ali izvrši sklep o začasnem zavarovanju, ter ki ni sodnik, sodišče ali državni tožilec.
In such cases, the freezing order should be validated by a judge, court or public prosecutor, before it is transmitted to the executing authority.
V takih primerih bi moral sklep o začasnem zavarovanju potrditi sodnik, sodišče ali državni tožilec, preden se posreduje izvršitvenemu organu.
Member States should be able to make a declaration stating that, when a freezing certificate or confiscation certificate is transmitted to them with a view to the recognition and execution of a freezing order or confiscation order, the issuing authority should transmit the original freezing order or confiscation order, or a certified copy thereof, together with the freezing certificate or confiscation certificate.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da predložijo izjavo, v kateri bi navedle, da bi jim moral organ izdajatelj v primeru posredovanja potrdila o začasnem zavarovanju ali potrdila o odvzemu za namene priznanja in izvršitve sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu skupaj s tem potrdilom posredovati tudi izvirnik sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklep o odvzemu oziroma njegovo overjeno kopijo.
Member States should inform the Commission where they make or withdraw such a declaration.
Države članice bi morale Komisijo obvestiti ob predložitvi ali umiku takšne izjave.
The Commission should make such information available to all Member States and to the European Judicial Network (EJN) provided for by Council Decision 2008/976/JHA.
Komisija bi morala takšne informacije dati na voljo vsem državam članicam in Evropski pravosodni mreži, določeni s Sklepom Sveta 2008/976/PNZ.
The EJN should make that information available on the website referred to in that Decision.
Evropska pravosodna mreža bi morala te informacije objaviti na spletišču iz navedenega sklepa.
The issuing authority should transmit a freezing certificate or confiscation certificate, together with the freezing order or confiscation order, where applicable, either directly to the executing authority or to the central authority of the executing State, as applicable, by any means capable of producing a written record under conditions that allow the executing authority to establish authenticity of the certificate or order, such as registered mail or secured email.
Organ izdajatelj bi moral potrdilo o začasnem zavarovanju ali potrdilo o odvzemu, po potrebi skupaj s sklepom o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepom o odvzemu, posredovati neposredno izvršitvenemu organu ali pa osrednjemu organu države izvršiteljice, kakor je ustrezno, in sicer na kateri koli način, ki omogoča pisni zapis in izvršitvenemu organu omogoči, da se prepriča o pristnosti potrdila oziroma sklepa, med drugim s priporočeno pošto ali zavarovano e-pošto.
The issuing authority should be able to make use of any relevant channels or means of transmission, including the secure telecommunications system of the EJN, Eurojust, or other channels used by judicial authorities.
Organ izdajatelj bi moral imeti možnost, da uporabi kateri koli kanal ali način posredovanja, vključno z varnim telekomunikacijskim sistemom Evropske pravosodne mreže, Eurojusta ali drugih kanalov, ki jih uporabljajo pravosodni organi.
Where the issuing authority has reasonable grounds to believe that the person against whom a freezing order or confiscation order concerning an amount of money was issued has property or income in a Member State, it should transmit the freezing certificate or confiscation certificate that relates to the order to that Member State.
Kadar organ izdajatelj utemeljeno domneva, da ima oseba, zoper katero je bil izdan sklep o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklep o odvzemu glede denarnega zneska, premoženje ali dohodek v državi članici, bi moral potrdilo o začasnem zavarovanju ali potrdilo o odvzemu, ki se nanaša na ta sklep, posredovati tej državi članici.
On that basis, the certificate could, for example, be transmitted to the Member State in which the natural person against whom the order was issued is residing or, where that person has no permanent address, is habitually residing.
Na tej podlagi bi se potrdilo lahko na primer posredovalo državi članici, v kateri prebiva fizična oseba, zoper katero je bil sklep izdan, kadar pa ta oseba nima stalnega naslova, pa državi članici, v kateri običajno prebiva.
Where the order is issued against a legal person, the certificate could be transmitted to the Member State in which the legal person is domiciled.
Kadar je sklep izdan zoper pravno osebo, bi se potrdilo lahko posredovalo državi članici, v kateri ima pravna oseba sedež.
With a view to the administrative transmission and reception of certificates relating to freezing orders and confiscation orders, Member States should be able to designate one or more central authorities where necessary due to the structure of their internal legal systems.
Pri upravnem posredovanju in sprejemanju potrdil v zvezi s sklepi o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepi o odvzemu bi države članice morale imeti možnost, da določijo enega ali več osrednjih organov, če je to potrebno zaradi strukture njihovih notranjih pravnih sistemov.
Such central authorities could also provide administrative support, play a coordination role and assist in the collection of statistics, thus facilitating and promoting the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders.
Ti osrednji organi bi lahko zagotovili tudi upravno podporo, imeli vlogo pri usklajevanju in pomagali pri zbiranju statističnih podatkov, s čimer bi se olajšalo in spodbujalo vzajemno priznavanje sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu.
Where a confiscation certificate that relates to a confiscation order concerning an amount of money is transmitted to more than one executing State, the issuing State should seek to avoid the situation whereby more property than necessary is confiscated and the total amount obtained from the execution of the order would exceed the maximum amount specified therein.
Če je potrdilo o odvzemu, ki se nanaša na sklep o odvzemu glede denarnega zneska, posredovano več kot eni državi izvršiteljici, bi si morala država izdajateljica prizadevati, da ne bi bilo odvzetega več premoženja, kot je potrebno, in bi skupni znesek, pridobljen na podlagi izvršitve sklepa presegel najvišji znesek, določen v njem.
To that end, the issuing authority should, inter alia, indicate in the confiscation certificate the value of assets, where known, in each executing State, so that the executing authorities can take account thereof, maintain the necessary contact and dialogue with the executing authorities on the property to be confiscated, and inform the relevant executing authority or authorities immediately if it considers that there could be a risk that confiscation in excess of the maximum amount might occur.
Organ izdajatelj bi zato med drugim moral v potrdilu o odvzemu navesti vrednost premoženja, če je znana, v vsaki državi izvršiteljici, tako da lahko izvršitveni organi to upoštevajo, vzdrževati potrebne stike in dialog z izvršitvenimi organi o premoženju, ki ga je treba odvzeti, in zadevni izvršitveni organ ali organe takoj obvestiti, če meni, da bi lahko obstajalo tveganje, da bi odvzem presegel najvišji znesek.
Where appropriate, Eurojust could exercise a coordinating role within its remit in order to avoid excessive confiscation.
Kadar je ustrezno, bi lahko Eurojust prevzel usklajevalno vlogo v okviru svojih pristojnosti, da bi preprečil prekomeren odvzem.
Member States should be encouraged to make a declaration stating that, as executing States, they would accept freezing certificates, confiscation certificates, or both, in one or more official languages of the Union other than their official languages.
Države članice bi bilo treba spodbuditi, da predložijo izjavo, v kateri bi navedle, da bodo kot države izvršiteljice sprejele potrdila o začasnem zavarovanju, potrdila o odvzemu ali oboje v enem ali več uradnih jezikih Unije, ki ni njihov uradni jezik.
The executing authority should recognise freezing orders and confiscation orders and should take the measures necessary for their execution.
Izvršitveni organ bi moral priznati sklepe o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepe o odvzemu ter sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za njihovo izvršitev.
The decision on the recognition and execution of the freezing order or confiscation order should be taken, and the freezing or confiscation should be carried out, with the same speed and priority as for similar domestic cases.
Odločitev o priznanju in izvršitvi sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu bi bilo treba sprejeti, začasno zavarovanje ali odvzem pa izvesti enako hitro in prednostno kot v podobnih nacionalnih primerih.
Time limits, which should be calculated in accordance with Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council, should be set out in order to ensure a quick and efficient decision on the recognition of the freezing order or confiscation order and a quick and efficient execution thereof.
Določiti bi bilo treba roke, ki bi morali biti izračunani v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71, da bi zagotovili hitro in učinkovito odločitev o priznanju sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu ter hitro in učinkovito izvršitev tega sklepa.
As regards freezing orders, the executing authority should start taking the concrete measures necessary to execute such orders no later than 48 hours after the decision on the recognition and execution thereof has been taken.
Izvršitveni organ bi moral najpozneje v 48 urah po sprejetju odločitve o priznanju in o izvršitvi sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju začeti konkretno ukrepati za izvršitev takšnih sklepov.
In the execution of a freezing order, the issuing authority and the executing authority should take due account of the confidentiality of the investigation.
Organ izdajatelj in izvršitveni organ bi morala pri izvršitvi sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ustrezno upoštevati zaupnost preiskave.
In particular, the executing authority should guarantee the confidentiality of the facts and substance of the freezing order.
Izvršitveni organ bi moral zagotoviti zlasti zaupnost dejstev in vsebine sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju.
This is without prejudice to the obligation to inform affected persons of the execution of a freezing order in accordance with this Regulation.
To ne posega v obveznost obveščanja oseb, na katere sklep vpliva, o izvršitvi sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju v skladu s to uredbo.
The recognition and execution of a freezing order or confiscation order should not be refused on grounds other than those provided for in this Regulation.
Priznanje in izvršitev sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu se ne bi smela zavrniti iz razlogov, ki niso določeni v tej uredbi.
This Regulation should permit the executing authorities not to recognise or execute confiscation orders on the basis of the principle of ne bis in idem, on the basis of the rights of affected persons or on the basis of the right to be present at the trial.
Ta uredba bi morala izvršitvenemu organu omogočiti, da ne prizna oziroma izvrši sklepov o odvzemu na podlagi načela ne bis in idem, na podlagi pravic oseb, na katere sklep vpliva, ali na podlagi pravice biti navzoč na sojenju.
This Regulation should permit executing authorities not to recognise or execute confiscation orders where the person against whom the confiscation order was issued did not appear in person at the trial that resulted in the confiscation order linked to a final conviction.
Ta uredba bi morala izvršitvenim organom omogočiti, da ne priznajo oziroma izvršijo sklepov o odvzemu, kadar se oseba, zoper katero je bil sklep o odvzemu izdan, ni osebno udeležila sojenja, ki se je zaključilo s sklepom o odvzemu, povezanim s pravnomočno obsodbo.
This should only be a ground for non-recognition or non-execution where trials result in confiscation orders linked to a final conviction and not where proceedings result in non-conviction-based confiscation orders.
To bi moral biti razlog za nepriznanje oziroma neizvršitev le, kadar se sojenje zaključi s sklepom o odvzemu, povezanim s pravnomočno obsodbo, in ne, kadar se postopek zaključi s sklepom o odvzemu, ki ne temelji na obsodbi.
However, in order for such a ground to be available, one or more hearings should be held.
Da se lahko ta razlog uporabi, pa bi bilo treba opraviti enega ali več narokov.
The ground should not be available if the relevant national procedural rules do not provide for a hearing.
Tega razloga ne bi smelo biti mogoče uporabiti, če v zadevnih nacionalnih postopkovnih pravilih narok ni predviden.
Such national procedural rules should comply with the Charter and with the ECHR, in particular with regard to the right to a fair trial.
Takšna nacionalna postopkovna pravila bi morala biti skladna z Listino in EKČP, zlasti kar zadeva pravico do poštenega sojenja.
This is the case, for example, where the proceedings are conducted in a simplified manner following, solely or partially, a written procedure or a procedure in which no hearing is provided for.
Ta pogoj je na primer izpolnjen, kadar postopek poteka na poenostavljen način, in sicer v celoti ali delno kot pisni postopek ali postopek, v katerem ni predviden narok.
It should be possible, in exceptional circumstances, not to recognise or execute a freezing order or confiscation order where such recognition or execution would prevent the executing State from applying its constitutional rules relating to freedom of the press or freedom of expression in other media.
Samo v izjemnih primerih bi moralo biti mogoče, da se sklep o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklep o odvzemu ne prizna ali izvrši, kadar bi takšno priznanje ali izvršitev državi izvršiteljici preprečilo, da uporablja svoja ustavna pravila o svobodi tiska ali svobodi izražanja v drugih medijih.
The creation of an area of freedom, security and justice within the Union is based on mutual trust and a presumption of compliance by other Member States with Union law and, in particular, with fundamental rights.
Vzpostavitev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice v Uniji temelji na medsebojnem zaupanju in domnevi, da druge države članice spoštujejo pravo Unije in zlasti temeljne pravice.
However, in exceptional situations, where there are substantial grounds to believe, on the basis of specific and objective evidence, that the execution of a freezing order or confiscation order would, in the particular circumstances of the case, entail a manifest breach of a relevant fundamental right as set out in the Charter, the executing authority should be able to decide not to recognise and execute the order concerned.
Vendar pa bi moral imeti izvršitveni organ v izjemnih primerih, ko je mogoče na podlagi specifičnih in objektivnih dokazov utemeljeno domnevati, da bi izvršitev sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu v posebnih okoliščinah primera pomenila očitno kršitev zadevnih temeljnih pravic, kot so določene v Listini, možnost, da odloči, da ne bo priznal in izvršil zadevnega sklepa.
The fundamental rights that should be relevant in this respect are, in particular, the right to an effective remedy, the right to a fair trial and the right of defence.
Temeljne pravice, ki bi jih bilo treba v zvezi s tem upoštevati, so zlasti pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, pravica do poštenega sojenja in pravica do obrambe.
The right to property should, in principle, not be relevant because freezing and confiscation of assets necessarily imply an interference with a person's right to property and because the necessary safeguards in that respect are already provided for in Union law, including in this Regulation.
Lastninska pravica se načeloma ne bi smela upoštevati, ker se pri začasnem zavarovanju in odvzemu premoženja nujno poseže v lastninsko pravico osebe in ker so potrebna jamstva v zvezi s tem že določena v pravu Unije, tudi v tej uredbi.
Before deciding not to recognise or execute a freezing order or confiscation order on the basis of any ground for non-recognition or non-execution, the executing authority should consult the issuing authority in order to obtain any necessary additional information.
Izvršitveni organ bi se moral pred odločitvijo, da ne prizna ali izvrši sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu na podlagi katerega koli razloga za nepriznanje ali neizvršitev, posvetovati z organom izdajateljem, da bi pridobil vse potrebne dodatne informacije.
When examining a request from the executing authority to limit the period during which the property should be frozen, the issuing authority should take into account all of the circumstances of the case, in particular whether the continuation of the freezing order could cause unjustified damage in the executing State.
Organ izdajatelj bi moral pri obravnavi zahteve izvršitvenega organa, da se omeji obdobje, v katerem naj bi bilo premoženje začasno zavarovano, upoštevati vse okoliščine primera, zlasti, ali bi lahko nadaljevanje sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju povzročilo neupravičeno škodo v državi izvršiteljici.
The executing authority is encouraged to consult with the issuing authority on this issue before making a formal request.
Preden izvršitveni organ poda formalno zahtevo, naj se o tem vprašanju posvetuje z organom izdajateljem.
The issuing authority should inform the executing authority when an authority of the issuing State receives any sum of money which has been paid in respect of the confiscation order, it being understood that the executing State should only be informed if the amount paid in respect of the order impacts on the outstanding amount that is to be confiscated pursuant to the order.
Organ izdajatelj bi moral v primeru, ko organ države izdajateljice prejme kakršen koli denarni znesek, ki je bil plačan v zvezi s sklepom o odvzemu, obvestiti izvršitveni organ, pri čemer se razume, da bi bilo treba državo izvršiteljico obvestiti le, če znesek, plačan v zvezi s sklepom, vpliva na neporavnan znesek, ki bi ga bilo treba odvzeti na podlagi sklepa.
It should be possible for the executing authority to postpone the execution of a freezing order or confiscation order, in particular where its execution might damage an ongoing criminal investigation.
Izvršitveni organ bi moral imeti možnost, da odloži izvršitev sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu, zlasti kadar bi lahko njegova izvršitev škodovala kazenski preiskavi v teku.
As soon as the grounds for postponement have ceased to exist, the executing authority should take the measures necessary for the execution of the order.
Takoj ko ni več razlogov za odlog, bi moral izvršitveni organ sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za izvršitev sklepa.
After the execution of a freezing order, and following the decision to recognise and execute a confiscation order, the executing authority should, in so far as possible, inform affected persons known to it of such execution or such decision.
Če je mogoče, bi moral izvršitveni organ po izvršitvi sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ter po sprejetju odločitve o priznanju in o izvršitvi sklepa o odvzemu o takšni izvršitvi ali odločitvi obvestiti osebe, na katere sklep vpliva in ki so mu znane.
To that end, the executing authority should make every reasonable effort to identify the affected persons, verify how they can be reached and inform them of the execution of the freezing order or of the decision to recognise and execute the confiscation order.
V ta namen bi si moral izvršitveni organ po najboljših močeh prizadevati, da ugotovi, kdo so osebe, na katere sklep vpliva, preveri, kako je z njimi mogoče priti v stik, ter jih obvesti o izvršitvi sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali odločitve o priznanju in o izvršitvi sklepa o odvzemu.
In carrying out that obligation, the executing authority could ask the issuing authority for assistance, for example where the affected persons appear to reside in the issuing State.
Izvršitveni organ bi lahko zahteval od organa izdajatelja, da mu pomaga pri izpolnjevanju te obveznosti, na primer če osebe, na katere sklep vpliva, domnevno prebivajo v državi izdajateljici.
The obligation under this Regulation for the executing authority to provide information to affected persons is without prejudice to any obligation of the issuing authority to provide information to persons under the law of the issuing State, for example regarding the issue of a freezing order or regarding existing legal remedies under the law of the issuing State.
Obveznost iz te uredbe, da izvršitveni organ zagotovi informacije osebam, na katere sklep vpliva, ne posega v nobeno obveznost organa izdajatelja, da zagotovi informacije osebam v skladu s pravom države izdajateljice, na primer o izdaji sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali o pravnih sredstvih, ki so na voljo v skladu s pravom države izdajateljice.
The issuing authority should be notified without delay if it is impossible to execute a freezing order or confiscation order.
Organ izdajatelj bi bilo treba nemudoma obvestiti, če sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu ni mogoče izvršiti.
Such impossibility might arise because the property has already been confiscated, has disappeared, has been destroyed or cannot be found at the location indicated by the issuing authority, or because the location of the property has not been indicated in a sufficiently precise manner despite consultations between the executing authority and the issuing authority.
Do tega bi lahko prišlo, ker je bilo premoženje že odvzeto, je izginilo, je bilo uničeno ali ga ni mogoče najti na lokaciji, ki jo je navedel organ izdajatelj, ali ker lokacija premoženja kljub posvetovanju med izvršitvenim organom in organom izdajateljem ni bila določena dovolj natančno.