natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Technical methodology for the project submission and selection procedure
Tehnična metodologija za postopek predložitve in izbire projektov
In view of the proposal made in the mid-term evaluation and positive experience made with two-stage approaches in some other EU programmes, the present LIFE MAWP introduces a two-stage approach for those priority areas, where up to now potential applicants with project ideas with a high EU added value and no experience with the LIFE programme, seem to have been discouraged by the level of detail needed for the evaluation of a full project proposal in view of the relatively low chances of success.
Glede na predlog iz vmesne ocene in pozitivne izkušnje z dvostopenjskimi pristopi iz nekaterih drugih programov EU se s tem večletnim delovnim programom LIFE uvaja dvostopenjski pristop za prednostna področja, za katera se zdi, da je morebitne prosilce z zamislimi za projekt z visoko dodano vrednostjo EU, ki niso imeli izkušenj s programom LIFE, doslej odvračala stopnja podrobnosti, potrebna za oceno popolnega predloga projekta, glede na razmeroma majhne možnosti za uspeh.
In the two-stage approach, only applicants with proposals that have a high chance to be selected, will be required to submit a full proposal (see 5.1.1.2(b))
Na podlagi dvostopenjskega pristopa bodo morali popoln predlog predložiti samo prosilci s predlogi, ki imajo velike možnosti za izbiro (glej oddelek 5.1.1.2(b)).
Therefore, under the present LIFE, two procedures are foreseen:
Zato sta v okviru sedanjega programa LIFE predvidena dva postopka:
a two-stage approach based on a concept note followed by a full proposal,
dvostopenjski pristop na podlagi dokumenta o konceptu, ki mu sledi popoln predlog;
a one-stage approach based only on a full proposal.
enostopenjski pristop samo na podlagi popolnega predloga.
The choice between these two approaches will be done by the EA in agreement with the Commission (Directorates-General for Environment and Climate Action) in view of the organisational and operational constraints for each call for proposal.
Za enega od teh dveh pristopov se bo odločila izvajalska agencija ob soglasju Komisije (generalnih direktoratov za okolje in podnebno politiko) ter ob upoštevanju organizacijskih in operativnih omejitev posameznega javnega razpisa.
For the call 2018 the two-stage approach will be used for the sub-programme for Environment.
Za razpis za leto 2018 se bo dvostopenjski pristop uporabil za podprogram za okolje.
Based on the feedback from beneficiaries, the approach may be extended to the sub-programme for Climate Action in the following years
Na podlagi povratnih informacij upravičencev se lahko ta pristop v prihodnjih letih razširi na podprogram za podnebne ukrepe.
The evaluation of the full proposals in the one stage approach is described under Sections 5.1.1.2 and 5.1.1.3.
Ocenjevanje popolnih predlogov v enostopenjskem pristopu je opisano v oddelkih 5.1.1.2 in 5.1.1.3.
The two-stage approach will be organised as follows:
Dvostopenjski pristop bo organiziran, kot je opisano v nadaljevanju.
The two-stage approach
Dvostopenjski pristop
Stage 1:
faza:
The applicant submits a concept note of a maximum of 10 pages including the following:
Prosilec predloži dokument o konceptu, ki obsega največ 10 strani, vključno z naslednjim:
administrative forms regarding the beneficiaries participating in the project,
upravnimi obrazci v zvezi z upravičenci, ki sodelujejo pri projektu;
an outline of the project contents, including a description of the main environmental project focus, the partnership foreseen, the constraints that might arise and the contingency plan to address these, as well as the strategy chosen to ensure sustainability of the project results beyond the project duration, and
opisom vsebine projekta, vključno z opisom glavnega okoljskega vprašanja, ki je predmet projekta, predvidenega partnerstva, omejitev, ki se lahko pojavijo, in načrta izrednih ukrepov za obravnavo teh omejitev ter izbrane strategije za zagotovitev trajnosti rezultatov projekta po njegovem zaključku, ter
the project budget at the level of cost categories.
proračunom projekta na ravni stroškovnih razredov.
Concept note evaluation and ranking
Ocena in razvrstitev dokumenta o konceptu
Concept note eligibility criteria
Merila za upravičenost dokumenta o konceptu
On the basis of the concept note, the EA identifies the proposals that comply with the eligibility criteria (see 5.1.1.2(a)).
Izvajalska agencija na podlagi dokumenta o konceptu opredeli predloge, ki izpolnjujejo merila za upravičenost (glej oddelek 5.1.1.2(a)).
Concept note award criteria
Merila za dodelitev za dokument o konceptu
Proposals will be ranked by merit, i.e. the points received on the basis of the award criteria ‘Overall quality of the proposal’ and ‘Overall EU added value’.
Predlogi bodo razvrščeni glede na kakovost, tj. točke, prejete na podlagi meril za dodelitev „splošna kakovost predloga“ in „skupna dodana vrednost EU“.
Proposals that did not reach the minimum threshold regarding one or both criteria will be excluded.
Predlogi, ki ne dosežejo najnižjega praga v zvezi z enim ali obema meriloma, bodo izključeni.
For proposals with equal scoring for the award criterion ‘Overall quality of the proposal’, priority will be given to those with a higher score for ‘Overall EU added value’.
Med predlogi z enakim številom točk na podlagi merila za dodelitev sredstev „splošna kakovost predloga“ bodo imeli prednost tisti z več točkami na podlagi merila za dodelitev sredstev „skupna dodana vrednost EU“.
In case there would be proposals with equal scoring for both criteria the final ranking will be decided by the evaluation committee.
Če predlogi dosežejo enako število točk pri obeh merilih, bo o končni razvrstitvi odločal ocenjevalni odbor.
List of projects retained
Seznam sprejetih projektov
The long list of concept note proposals invited to submit a full proposal will include the best ranked proposals, for which the sum of the EU contributions requested represents 2 to 2,5 times the available budget.
Dolgi seznam predlogov z dokumenti o konceptu, ki bodo izbrani za predložitev popolnega predloga, bo vključeval najbolje uvrščene predloge, pri katerih vsota zahtevanih prispevkov EU obsega 2- do 2,5-kratnik razpoložljivega proračuna.
The EA will set the factor based on the results of the ranking, taking into account the size of the proposals and the experience acquired regarding the two-stage approach.
Izvajalska agencija bo določila faktor na podlagi rezultatov razvrščanja, pri čemer bo upoštevala obseg predlogov in izkušnje, pridobljene v zvezi z dvostopenjskim pristopom.
The long list will include sub-lists for each priority area.
Dolgi seznam bo vključeval podsezname za vsako prednostno področje.
In case the demand under one priority area is insufficient, the lists corresponding to the other priority areas may be extended.
Če bo povpraševanje na enem prednostnem področju nezadostno, se lahko seznami, ki se nanašajo na druga prednostna področja, razširijo.
Stage 2:
faza:
A limited flexibility is allowed between the concept note and the full proposal regarding the actions, partnership and budget.
Proračun se lahko od proračuna v dokumentu o konceptu razlikuje za največ 10 %.
However, flexibility may not lead to a change of the nature of the concept note proposal.
Ocena in razvrstitev popolnega predloga
The budget may deviate from the one in the concept note by a maximum of 10 %.
Predlogi se bodo ocenili in razvrstili na podlagi meril za upravičenost in dodelitev sredstev, kot je opisano v oddelku 5.1.1.2.
Full proposal evaluation and ranking
Priprava končnega seznama projektov, ki bodo financirani, in rezervnega seznama
Proposals will be evaluated and ranked on the basis of the eligibility and award criteria as described under 5.1.1.2.
Po fazi pregleda bodo uspešni projekti predlagani za financiranje v okviru razpoložljivega proračuna.
Preparation of the final list of projects to be funded and of the reserve list
Pripravljen bo rezervni seznam z najbolje uvrščenimi projekti, ki jih ni mogoče financirati v okviru razpoložljivega proračuna.
After a review phase successful projects will be proposed for funding, within the available budget.
Rezervni seznam bo obsegal dodatnih 20 % proračuna, ki je na voljo za program LIFE.
A reserve list will be constituted with the best-ranked projects that cannot be funded in view of the available budget.
Podpis sporazuma o nepovratnih sredstvih
The reserve list will encompass an additional 20 % of the available LIFE budget.
Enostopenjski pristop
Signature of the grant agreement
Predložitev popolnega predloga
The one-stage approach
Prosilci predložijo popoln predlog.
Submission of the full proposal
Predlogi se bodo ocenili na podlagi meril za upravičenost in dodelitev sredstev ter razvrstili, kot je opisano v oddelku 5.1.1.2.
Applicants submit a full proposal.
Merila za upravičenost in dodelitev sredstev
Proposals will be evaluated against the eligibility and award criteria and ranked as described under 5.1.1.2.
Merila za upravičenost (a) se bodo v primeru dvostopenjskega pristopa uporabila za dokumente o konceptu, v primeru enostopenjskega pristopa pa za popolne predloge.
Eligibility and award criteria
Merila za dodelitev sredstev (b) se bodo uporabila, kot je opisano v oddelku 5.1.1.1 zgoraj.
The eligibility criteria (a) will be applied to the concept note, in the case of the two-stage approach, and to the full proposals, in the case of the one-stage approach.
Merila za upravičenost
The award criteria (b) will be applied as described under 5.1.1.1 above:
Ocena kakovosti dokumenta o konceptu in popolnega predloga projekta v smislu člena 18(a), (b) (c), ali (h) uredbe LIFE ne bo opravljena, če predlog projekta ne dokazuje, da projekt:
Eligibility criteria
prispeva k enemu ali več splošnih ciljev iz člena 3 uredbe LIFE in zastavljenih posebnih ciljev iz členov 10, 11, 12, 14, 15 in 16 uredbe LIFE;
Both a concept note and full proposal for a project within the meaning of Article 18(a), (b), (c), or (h) of the LIFE Regulation will not be retained for an evaluation of its merit, if the project proposal does not demonstrate that the project:
spada v obseg prednostnega področja podprograma programa LIFE iz členov 9 in 13 uredbe LIFE, v okviru katerega je bil predlog projekta predložen, in
contributes to one or several of the general objectives set out in Article 3 of the LIFE Regulation and of the applicable specific objectives in Articles 10, 11, 12 and 14, 15 and 16 of the LIFE Regulation,
ustreza eni od naslednjih vrst projektov, opredeljenih v členu 2(a), (b), (c) in (h) uredbe LIFE:
falls within the scope of the priority area of the LIFE sub-programme as set out in Articles 9 and 13 of the LIFE Regulation under which the project proposal was submitted, and
„pilotni projekti“ so projekti, pri katerih se uporablja tehnika ali metoda, ki pred tem še ni bila uporabljena ali preskušena, ki prinaša morebitne okoljske in podnebne prednosti v primerjavi s trenutno najboljšo prakso in ki jo je pozneje v podobnih razmerah mogoče uporabiti v večjem obsegu;
corresponds to one of the following project types as defined in Article 2 (a), (b), (c) and (h) of the LIFE Regulation:
„predstavitveni projekti“ so projekti, ki vpeljejo v prakso, preskušajo, ocenjujejo in razširjajo ukrepe, metodologije ali pristope, so novi ali neznani v posebnem sklopu projekta, kot so geografski, ekološki in socialno-ekonomski sklop, in ki bi jih bilo mogoče v podobnih okoliščinah uporabiti tudi drugje;
‘Pilot projects’ are projects that apply a technique or method that has not been applied or tested before, or elsewhere, that offer potential environmental or climate advantages compared to current best practice and that can subsequently be applied on a larger scale to similar situations.
„projekti najboljše prakse“ so projekti, pri katerih se uporabljajo ustrezne, stroškovno učinkovite in najsodobnejše tehnike, metode in pristopi, hkrati pa se upošteva poseben sklop projekta;
‘Demonstration projects’ are projects that, put into practice, test, evaluate and disseminate actions, methodologies or approaches that are new or unknown in the specific context of the project, such as the geographical, ecological, socioeconomic context, and that could be applied elsewhere in similar circumstances.
„projekti za informiranje, ozaveščenost in razširjanje“ so projekti, namenjeni podpori za komuniciranje, razširjanje informacij in ozaveščanje na področju podprogramov za okolje in za podnebne ukrepe.
‘Best practice projects’ are projects that apply appropriate, cost-effective and state-of-the-art techniques, methods and approaches taking into account the specific context of the project.
Pilotni in predstavitveni projekti na prednostnem področju okolje in učinkovita raba virov ter pilotni in predstavitveni projekti ter projekti najboljše prakse na prednostnih področjih blažitev podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam morajo vsebovati ukrepe, s katerimi se zagotovijo znatni in merljivi neposredni učinki na ciljna vprašanja na področju okoljskih in/ali podnebnih ukrepov.
‘Information, awareness and dissemination projects’ are projects aimed at supporting communication, dissemination of information and awareness raising in the fields of the sub-programme for Environment or Climate Action.
Pri pilotnih in predstavitvenih projektih ter projektih najboljše prakse na prednostnem področju narava in biotska raznovrstnost je treba vsaj 25 % upravičenega proračuna nameniti konkretnim ohranitvenim ukrepom (ob upoštevanju posebnih potreb politike bodo mogoče omejene izjeme, ki bodo izrecno opredeljene v navodilih za oddajo vlog).
Pilot and demonstration projects under the priority area Environment and Resource Efficiency, and pilot, demonstration and best practice projects under the priority areas Climate Change Mitigation and Climate Change Adaptation, must contain actions that lead to substantial and measurable direct effects on the environmental and/or climate action issue(s) targeted.
Konkretni ohranitveni ukrepi so tisti, s katerimi se zagotovijo znatni in merljivi neposredni učinki na ciljna okoljska in podnebna vprašanja, ki v tem primeru vodijo do izboljšanja stanja ohranjenosti ali ekoloških razmer ciljnih vrst, habitatov, ekosistemov ali ekosistemskih storitev ali do upočasnitve/zaustavitve/preobrata slabšanja njihovega stanja ohranjenosti ali ekoloških razmer (več podrobnosti je v navodilih za oddajo vlog).
Pilot, demonstration and best practice projects under the priority area Nature and Biodiversity, must dedicate at least 25 % of the eligible budget to concrete conservation actions (limited exceptions will be possible in view of the specific policy needs and will be explicitly identified in the application guidelines).
Pilotni in predstavitveni projekti, projekti najboljše prakse ter projekti za informiranje, ozaveščenost in razširjanje na prednostnih področjih okoljsko ali podnebno upravljanje in informacije morajo vsebovati ukrepe, ki vodijo do znatnih in merljivih neposrednih ali posrednih učinkov na ciljna vprašanja na področju okoljskih in/ali podnebnih ukrepov s povzročanjem znatnih in merljivih neposrednih učinkov na ciljna vprašanja upravljanja, informiranja in/ali ozaveščenosti in razširjenja, povezana z okoljem in/ali podnebjem.
Concrete conservation actions are those that have substantial and measurable direct effects on the environmental and climate issue(s) targeted, in this case leading to the improvement or the slowing/halting/reversion of the decline of the conservation status or ecological condition of the species, habitats, ecosystems or ecosystem services targeted (for more details refer to the application guidelines).
Ciljni učinki na področju okoljskih in podnebnih ukrepov in/ali povezanega upravljanja in informacij bi že morali biti merljivi in merjeni ali modelirani na podlagi meritev med obdobjem projekta.
Pilot, demonstration, best practice or information, awareness and dissemination projects under the priority areas Environmental or Climate Action Governance and Information must contain actions that lead to substantial and measurable direct or indirect effects on the environmental and/or climate action issue(s) targeted by causing substantial and measurable direct effects on the environmental and/or climate related governance, information, and/or awareness and dissemination issue(s) targeted.
Da bi se preprečilo prekrivanje z drugimi programi EU, projekti, osredotočeni na raziskave ali namenjeni gradnji velike infrastrukture, ne spadajo na področje uporabe programa LIFE in zato niso upravičeni.
The targeted environmental, climate action and/or related governance and information effects should already be measurable and measured or modelled on the basis of measurements during the project period.
Projekti LIFE niso namenjeni financiranju izravnalnih ukrepov, ki izhajajo iz obveznosti na podlagi nacionalnega prava ali prava EU.
As a measure to avoid overlap with other EU programmes, projects focused on research or dedicated to the construction of large infrastructure do not fall within the scope of the LIFE programme and are therefore not eligible.
Merila za dodelitev sredstev
LIFE projects shall not serve to fund compensation measures deriving from obligations under national or EU law.
Merila za dodelitev sredstev veljajo za vsa prednostna področja, če ni navedeno drugače.
Award criteria
Projekti si konkurirajo samo na istem prednostnem področju.
The award criteria apply to all priority areas, unless specified otherwise.
Posebna merila za dodelitev za dokumente o konceptu
Projects only compete with each other within the same Priority Area.
Vsi dokumenti o konceptu v 1. fazi dvostopenjskega pristopa morajo doseči vsaj najmanjše število zahtevanih točk pri spodaj navedenih merilih za dodelitev sredstev, da se lahko upoštevajo za razvrščanje.
Particular award criteria for concept notes
Splošna kakovost predloga: to merilo bo osredotočeno na jasnost predlogov (vključno z opisom predoperativnega okvira), njihovo izvedljivost ter okvirno razmerje med ceno in kakovostjo.
All concept notes in stage 1 of the two-stage approach have to obtain at least a passing score for the following award criteria, in order to be considered for ranking:
Največje število točk je 20 (najmanjše število zahtevanih točk pa 5).
Overall quality of the proposal: this criterion will focus on the clarity of the proposals (including the description of the pre-operational context), its feasibility and the indicative value for money.
Skupna dodana vrednost EU: to merilo bo osredotočeno na prispevek projekta k prednostnim nalogam programa LIFE, njegov predvideni vpliv in trajnost rezultatov projekta.
Max points 20 (with a passing minimum score of 5).
Največje število točk je 30 (najmanjše število zahtevanih točk pa 10).
Overall EU added value: this criterion will focus on the project contribution to the LIFE priorities, its expected impact, and the sustainability of the project results.
Merila za dodelitev sredstev za popolne predloge
Max points 30 (with a passing minimum of 10).
Pri obeh pristopih, dvostopenjskem in enostopenjskem, se bo kakovost popolnih predlogov ocenila in točkovala v skladu z naslednjim sistemom meril za dodelitev sredstev in točkovanje.
Award criteria for full proposals
Tehnična skladnost in kakovost
For both, the two-stage and the one-stage approaches, full proposals will be evaluated and scored on their merit according to the following award criteria and scoring system:
Tehnična skladnost pomeni, da bi morali biti predlagani ukrepi projekta ustrezni in izvedljivi ukrepi za doseganje napovedanih učinkov in rezultatov projekta.
Technical coherence and quality
Ukrepi ter predvideni učinki in rezultati ne bi smeli biti v nasprotju s cilji programa LIFE.
Technical coherence means that the project actions proposed should be appropriate and feasible measures for achieving the forecast project outputs and outcomes.
Tehnična kakovost pomeni, da bi morali biti ukrepi projekta usmerjeni v zagotovitev čim večje uspešnosti in učinkovitosti v zvezi z zastavljenimi učinki in rezultati.
Neither the actions nor the foreseen outputs and outcomes should contradict any of the objectives pursued by the LIFE programme.
Ukrepi projekta bi morali biti dobro načrtovani in jasno opisani.
Technical quality means the project actions should aim at maximising their effectiveness and efficiency in relation to the outputs and outcomes pursued.
Finančna skladnost in kakovost
The project actions should be well planned and clearly described.
Finančni prispevki upravičencev in nosilcev sofinanciranja, predlagani proračun ter njegova usklajenost s predlaganimi ukrepi in veljavnimi pravili, pa tudi stroškovna učinkovitost ter razmerje med ceno in kakovostjo predlaganega pristopa bodo ocenjeni na podlagi tega merila v zvezi s predvidenimi rezultati ukrepov, za katere se šteje, da so dovolj tehnično skladni in sprejemljive tehnične kakovosti.
Financial coherence and quality
Proračun mora biti pregleden, tj. postavke stroškov je treba ustrezno opisati.
The financial contributions of the beneficiaries and co-funders, the proposed budget and its consistency with the actions proposed and with the applicable rules as well as the cost-effectiveness and value-for-money of the proposed approach will be evaluated under this criterion as regards the expected outcomes of the actions considered sufficiently technically coherent and of acceptable technical quality.
Dodana vrednost EU: obseg in kakovost prispevka k posebnim ciljem prednostnih področij obeh podprogramov programa LIFE
The budget must be transparent, i.e. the cost items should be sufficiently described.
Če se za posamezni predlog šteje, da je ustrezno tehnično in finančno dovolj skladen, njegova kakovost pa sprejemljiva, bosta ocenjena obseg, v katerem bo predvidoma prispeval k enemu ali več posebnim ciljem prednostnih področij obeh podprogramov programa LIFE iz členov 10, 11 in 12 uredbe LIFE (za podprogram za okolje) ter členov 14, 15 in 16 (za podprogram programa LIFE za podnebne ukrepe), ter kakovost tega prispevka.
EU added value: extent and quality of the contribution to the specific objectives of the priority areas of the two LIFE sub-programmes
Ocena tega merila zajema zlasti obseg in kakovost prispevka k ciljnim posebnim ciljem (vpliv) ter stopnjo pričakovanih okoljskih in/ali podnebnih učinkov ukrepov projekta ob koncu projekta v primerjavi z ocenjenim ali izmerjenim stanjem na začetku projekta.
The extent to which each proposal, in as far as it is considered technically and financially sufficiently coherent and of acceptable quality, is expected to contributes to one or several of the specific objectives of the priority areas of the two LIFE sub-programmes as set out in Articles 10, 11 and 12 of the LIFE Regulation (for the LIFE Environment sub-programme) and Articles 14, 15 and 16 (for the LIFE Climate Action sub-programme) and the quality of this contribution will be evaluated.
Pri oceni se upošteva tudi pomen ozemeljskih, socialnih in političnih sklopov, na katere bodo ukrepi projekta predvidoma vplivali.
The expected effects should be expressed having in mind the applicable project level indicators and measuring units, which the projects will have to report on in the LIFE key project-level indicator (KPI) data base created for this purpose.
Srednje- in dolgoročna trajnost rezultatov projekta je zmožnost njihovega ohranjanja po izvedbi projekta, in sicer tako, da se nadaljujejo, ponovijo ali prenesejo.
Thus, e.g. LIFE Nature and Biodiversity proposals will be assessed based on their expected effects on the structures and functions of the habitats and the status of the species and/or the ecological status of ecosystems and the condition of their services.
Nadaljevanje pomeni nadaljnjo uporabo rešitev, izvedenih pri projektu, po koncu obdobja projekta pri subjektih, ki so sodelovali pri projektu, lahko pa tudi na širšem geografskem območju.
This assessment only takes into account the actions considered feasible on the basis of the evaluation of the technical and financial coherence.
Zgolj nadaljevanje in ohranjanje rezultatov projekta bo zadostovalo za najmanjše število zahtevanih točk, dodatno geografsko širjenje pa bo ocenjeno glede na njegov predvideni obseg, zato je primerljivo s ponavljanjem ali prenosom.