natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For reasons of coherence and to reduce the administrative burden imposed on the Member States and economic operators, it is appropriate to take account of synergies between that and this Regulation.
Zaradi skladnosti in zmanjšanja upravnega bremena držav članic in gospodarskih subjektov je primerno upoštevati sinergije med navedeno in to uredbo.
The system of verification and accreditation should avoid any unnecessary duplication of procedures and organisations established pursuant to other Union legal instruments that would result in an increased burden for Member States or economic operators.
V okviru sistema za preverjanje in akreditacije bi se bilo treba izogniti nepotrebnemu podvajanju postopkov in organizacij, vzpostavljenih na podlagi drugih pravnih instrumentov Unije, kar bi povečalo obremenitev držav članic ali gospodarskih subjektov.
Therefore, it is appropriate to draw on best practices resulting from the application of harmonised standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation on the basis of a request made by the Commission in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, such as the harmonised standard concerning general requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies, and the harmonised standard concerning requirements for greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies for use in accreditation or other forms of recognition, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, as well as Document EA-6/03 and other technical documents developed by the European cooperation for accreditation or by other bodies.
Zato je primerno uporabiti najboljše prakse, ki temeljijo na uporabi harmoniziranih standardov, ki jih je sprejel Evropski odbor za standardizacijo na podlagi zahteve Komisije v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1025/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, kot sta harmonizirani standard, ki določa splošne zahteve za akreditacijske organe, ki akreditirajo organe za ugotavljanje skladnosti, ter harmonizirani standard, ki določa zahteve za organe za potrjevanje in preverjanje toplogrednih plinov in se uporablja pri akreditaciji ali drugih oblikah priznavanja, pri čemer so sklicevanja nanju objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, ter dokumenta EA-6/03 in drugih tehničnih dokumentov, ki jih je pripravilo Evropsko združenje za akreditacijo ali drugi organi.
When establishing harmonised rules for the verification of operator's or aircraft operator's reports and the accreditation of verifiers, it is necessary to ensure that the burden imposed on operators emitting a lower amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) per year, on aircraft operators considered small emitters within the meaning of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, as well as on the available resources of the Member States is not disproportionate to the aims pursued.
Pri določitvi usklajenih pravil za preverjanje poročil upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova in akreditacijo preveriteljev je treba zagotoviti, da obremenitev upravljavcev, ki povzročijo manjšo količino emisij ogljikovega dioksida (CO2) na leto, operaterjev zrakoplova, ki se v smislu Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/2066 štejejo za male onesnaževalce, ter razpoložljivih sredstev držav članic ni nesorazmerna z zastavljenimi cilji.
To make best use of synergies and given the importance of verification of data used for the update of ex ante benchmarks and the determination of free allocation to installations, it is appropriate to include rules for verification of baseline data reports and new entrant data reports which are required by Commission Delegated Regulation …/… of 19 December 2018 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council into the harmonised rules for verification and accreditation of verifiers.
Za najboljši izkoristek sinergij in zaradi pomembnosti preverjanja podatkov, ki se uporabljajo za posodobitev predhodnih referenčnih vrednosti in določitev brezplačne dodelitve za naprave, je primerno, da se v usklajena pravila za preverjanje in akreditacijo preveriteljev vključijo pravila za preverjanje poročil o izhodiščnih podatkih in poročil o podatkih o novih udeležencih, ki jih zahteva Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) …/… z dne 19. decembra 2018 o določitvi prehodnih pravil za usklajeno brezplačno dodelitev pravic do emisije na ravni Unije v skladu s členom 10a Direktive 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Article 27 of Directive 2003/87/EC allows Member States to exclude small installations, subject to equivalent measures, from the Union's greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system provided that the conditions contained in that Article are met.
Na podlagi člena 27 Direktive 2003/87/ES lahko države članice izključijo male naprave, za katere veljajo enakovredni ukrepi, iz sistema Unije za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz navedenega člena.
Article 27a of Directive 2003/87/EC allows Member States to exclude installation emitting less than 2500 tonnes, from the Union's greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system provided that the conditions contained in that Article are met.
Na podlagi člena 27a Direktive 2003/87/ES lahko države članice izključijo naprave, ki povzročijo manj kot 2500 ton emisij, iz sistema Unije za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz navedenega člena.
This Regulation should not apply directly to those installations excluded pursuant to Article 27 or 27a of Directive 2003/87/EC unless the Member State decides that this Regulation should apply.
Ta uredba se ne bi smela uporabljati neposredno za naprave, izključene v skladu s členom 27 ali členom 27a Direktive 2003/87/ES, razen če se država članica odloči, da se ta uredba mora uporabljati.
In accordance with the principles of Annex V to Directive 2003/87/EC, the verifier should carry out a site visit to check the boundaries of the respective installation or aircraft operator, to assess the operation of measuring devices and monitoring systems, to conduct interviews and to carry out other activities.
V skladu z načeli iz Priloge V k Direktivi 2003/87/ES bi moral preveritelj opraviti obisk na lokaciji, da bi preveril omejitve zadevne naprave ali operaterja zrakoplova, ocenil delovanje merilnih naprav in sistemov spremljanja, opravil razgovore in druge dejavnosti.
The verifier's site visit should be waived only under specific conditions.
Obisk preveritelja na lokaciji bi se lahko opustil le pod posebnimi pogoji.
In accordance with the principles of Annex V to Directive 2003/87/EC, the verifier should apply a risk-based approach with the aim of reaching a verification opinion providing reasonable assurance that the total emissions or tonne-kilometres are not materially misstated and the report can be verified as satisfactory.
Preveritelj bi moral v skladu z načeli iz Priloge V k Direktivi 2003/87/ES uporabiti pristop, ki temelji na tveganju, da bi izdal mnenje pri preverjanju z zadostno zanesljivostjo, da navedbe skupnih emisij ali tonskih kilometrov ne vsebujejo bistvenih napak in da je poročilo mogoče potrditi kot zadovoljivo.
The level of assurance should relate to the depth and detail of verification activities carried out during the verification and the wording of the verification opinion statement.
Stopnja zanesljivosti bi morala biti odvisna od tega, kako temeljito in natančno so bile med preverjanjem opravljene dejavnosti preverjanja, ter od besedila izjave mnenja pri preverjanju.
If the findings and information obtained during the verification process so require, the verifier should be obliged to adjust one or more activities in the verification process to meet the requirements for achieving reasonable assurance.
Preveritelj bi moral biti dolžan prilagoditi eno ali več dejavnosti v postopku preverjanja, da se izpolnijo zahteve za doseganje zadostne zanesljivosti, če je to potrebno na podlagi ugotovitev in informacij, pridobljenih med postopkom preverjanja.
To avoid entanglement between the role of the competent authority and the verifier, the responsibilities of a verifier when carrying out verification should be clearly defined.
Da se vlogi pristojnega organa in preveritelja ne bi prekrivali, bi bilo treba pri opravljanju preverjanja jasno opredeliti odgovornosti preveritelja.
The verifier should take the monitoring plan approved by the competent authority as a reference point and assess whether this plan and the procedures described in this plan have been implemented correctly.
Preveritelj bi moral načrt spremljanja, ki ga je odobril pristojni organ, vzeti za izhodišče ter oceniti, ali so bili načrt in postopki iz načrta pravilno izvedeni.
Where the verifier identifies non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, it should be the responsibility of the verifier to report this non-compliance issue in the verification report.
Če preveritelj ugotovi neizpolnjevanje Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/2066, bi morala biti njegova odgovornost, da o tem neizpolnjevanju poroča v poročilu o preverjanju.
Full understanding of the activities of an operator or an aircraft operator is necessary for the performance of an effective verification of an operator's or aircraft operator's report.
Za učinkovito preverjanje poročila upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova je potrebno popolno razumevanje njunih dejavnosti.
A verifier should only perform the requested verification activities after it has ascertained following a preliminary assessment that it is competent to do so.
Preveritelj bi lahko zahtevane dejavnosti preverjanja opravljal šele po tem, ko bi se s predhodno oceno prepričal, da je za to usposobljen.
In the pursuit of a high-quality level of verification activities, harmonised rules should be developed for a preliminary assessment to determine whether a verifier is competent, independent and impartial to carry out the requested verification activities in accordance with the rules and principles set out in this Regulation.
Da bi se zagotovila visoka kakovost dejavnosti preverjanja, bi bilo treba oblikovati usklajena pravila za predhodno oceno, na podlagi katere bi se določilo, ali je preveritelj usposobljen, neodvisen in nepristranski, da lahko zahtevane dejavnosti preverjanja opravlja v skladu s pravili in načeli iz te uredbe.
Provision of relevant information between the operator or the aircraft operator and the verifier is essential in all facets of the verification process, in particular in the pre-contractual phase, in the performance of a strategic analysis by the verifier and throughout the verification.
Zagotavljanje ustreznih informacij upravljavcev ali operaterjev zrakoplova preveritelju je ključno v vseh fazah postopka preverjanja, zlasti v fazi pred sklenitvijo pogodbe, pri preveriteljevem opravljanju strateške analize in med celotnim postopkom preverjanja.
All verification activities in the verification process are interconnected and should be concluded with the issuance of a verification report by the verifier containing a verification statement that is commensurate with the outcome of the verification assessment.
Vse dejavnosti preverjanja v postopku preverjanja so med seboj povezane in bi se morale zaključiti s poročilom preveritelja o preverjanju, ki vsebuje izjavo preverjanja, sorazmerno z rezultati ocene preverjanja.
Harmonised requirements for the verification reports and the performance of the verification activities should be established to ensure that verification reports and verification activities in the Member States meet the same standards.
Določiti bi bilo treba usklajene zahteve za poročila o preverjanju in opravljanju dejavnosti preverjanja, da bi se zagotovilo, da poročila o preverjanju in dejavnosti preverjanja v državah članicah izpolnjujejo iste standarde.
Analysing the susceptibility of reported data to misstatements that could be material is an essential part of the verification process and determines how the verification activities should be carried out by the verifier.
Analiza dovzetnosti sporočenih podatkov za potencialno bistvene napačne navedbe je pomemben del postopka preverjanja, na podlagi katerega se določi, kako bi moral preveritelj opravljati dejavnosti preverjanja.
Every element in the verification process shall therefore be strongly linked to the outcome of the analysis of these risks of misstatements.
Vsak element postopka preverjanja je tako tesno povezan z rezultati analize teh tveganj v zvezi z napačnimi navedbami.
Specific provision should be made for the verification of the report of aircraft operators and that of operators of sites, which are subject to Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Sprejeti bi bilo treba posebne določbe za preverjanje poročil operaterjev zrakoplova in upravljavcev območij, za katera velja Direktiva 2009/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Correct and effective reporting of greenhouse gas emissions by the operator or the aircraft operator is essential for the implementation of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Pravilno in dejansko poročanje upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova o emisijah toplogrednih plinov je bistveno za izvajanje Direktive 2003/87/ES.
To ensure the proper functioning of the monitoring and reporting process, continuous improvement of the operator or aircraft operator's performance should be part of the verification activities performed by the verifier.
Da bi se zagotovilo ustrezno izvajanje postopkov spremljanja in poročanja, bi bilo treba v dejavnosti preverjanja, ki jih opravlja preveritelj, vključiti stalno izboljševanje delovanja upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova.
Verification activities and the issuance of verification reports should only be carried out by verifiers and their personnel that are competent.
Dejavnosti preverjanja in izdajanje poročil o preverjanju bi lahko opravljali samo preveritelji in njihovo usposobljeno osebje.
Verifiers should establish and continuously improve internal processes that ensure that all personnel involved in the verification activities are competent to perform the tasks entrusted to them.
Preveritelji bi morali uvesti in stalno izboljševati notranje postopke, ki zagotavljajo, da je celotno osebje, ki sodeluje pri dejavnostih preverjanja, usposobljeno za opravljanje zaupanih jim nalog.
The criteria for determining whether a verifier is competent should be the same in all Member States and should be verifiable, objective and transparent.
Merila za ugotavljanje usposobljenosti preveritelja bi morala biti enaka v vseh državah članicah ter preverljiva, objektivna in pregledna.
The national accreditation body established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 should be empowered to accredit and issue an authoritative statement concerning the competence of a verifier to perform the verification activities pursuant to this Regulation, adopt administrative measures and carry out the surveillance of verifiers.
Nacionalni akreditacijski organ, ustanovljen v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 765/2008, bi moral biti pooblaščen za akreditacijo in izdajo zavezujoče izjave o usposobljenosti preveritelja za opravljanje dejavnosti preverjanja v skladu s to uredbo, sprejemanje upravnih ukrepov in izvajanje nadzora nad preveritelji.
Templates and specific file formats to be used by verifiers promote harmonisation between Member States and avoid differences in approaches.
S predlogami in posebnimi oblikami datotek, ki jih preveritelji uporabljajo, se spodbuja usklajevanje med državami članicami in preprečijo različni pristopi.
Verifiers should use templates or specific file formats developed by the Commission.
Preveritelji bi morali uporabljati predloge ali posebne oblike datotek, ki jih pripravi Komisija.
Where a Member State has developed national templates or file format specifications, these should contain at least the same content as the templates developed by the Commission to ensure harmonised approaches.
Če država članica pripravi lastne nacionalne predloge ali specifikacije za oblike datotek, bi morale imeti vsaj enako vsebino kot predloge, ki jih je Komisija pripravila za zagotovitev usklajenih pristopov.
A Member State that does not consider it economically meaningful or sustainable to establish a national accreditation body or to carry out accreditation activities should have recourse to the national accreditation body of another Member State.
Državi članici, ki meni, da ustanovitev nacionalnega akreditacijskega organa ali opravljanje dejavnosti akreditiranja ni ekonomsko smiselno ali vzdržno, bi bilo treba omogočiti, da uporablja nacionalni akreditacijski organ druge države članice.
Only national accreditation bodies that have undergone a successful peer evaluation organised by the body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 should be permitted to perform the accreditation activities pursuant to this Regulation.
Opravljanje dejavnosti akreditiranja v skladu s to uredbo bi se moralo dovoliti samo nacionalnim akreditacijskim organom, ki so uspešno opravili medsebojni strokovni pregled, ki ga je organiziral organ, priznan v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008.
National accreditation bodies that demonstrate conformity with this Regulation and that have already successfully undergone peer evaluation organised by the body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 765/2008 should be presumed to fulfil the procedural requirements imposed on national accreditation bodies such as requirements on the structure of a national accreditation body, setting up a competence process, setting up the necessary procedures and management system and arrangements to safeguard the confidentiality of information obtained and should be exempted from undergoing a new peer evaluation following the entry into force of this Regulation.
Za nacionalne akreditacijske organe, ki dokazujejo skladnost s to uredbo in so že uspešno opravili medsebojni strokovni pregled, ki ga je organiziral organ, priznan v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008, bi bilo treba domnevati, da izpolnjujejo postopkovne zahteve za nacionalne akreditacijske organe – kot so zahteve glede njihove strukture, uvedbe postopka ohranjanja usposobljenosti, uvedbe potrebnih postopkov, sistema upravljanja in ureditve za zagotavljanje zaupnosti pridobljenih informacij – ter bi jih bilo treba po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe izvzeti iz novega medsebojnega strokovnega pregleda.
In accordance with Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, environmental information contained in verified operator's or aircraft operator's reports held by the public authorities should be made public to ensure transparency, subject to certain confidentiality requirements.
V skladu z Direktivo 2003/4/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta bi bilo treba okoljske informacije iz preverjenih poročil upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova, ki jih hranijo javni organi, zaradi preglednosti objaviti ter pri tem upoštevati določene zahteve glede zaupnosti.
Effective cooperation between national accreditation bodies, or where applicable other national authorities, and competent authorities is essential for the proper functioning of the greenhouse gas emission allowance system and the supervision on the quality of verification.
Učinkovito sodelovanje med nacionalnimi akreditacijskimi organi ali po potrebi med drugimi nacionalnimi organi in pristojnimi organi je ključno za ustrezno delovanje sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov in nadzor kakovosti preverjanja.
Information exchanges between competent authorities and between competent authorities and national accreditation bodies or other national authorities should be governed by the strictest guarantees of confidentiality and professional secrecy and be handled in accordance with applicable national and Union law.
Za izmenjavo informacij med pristojnimi organi ter med pristojnimi organi in nacionalnimi akreditacijskimi organi ali drugimi nacionalnimi organi bi moralo veljati strogo varovanje zaupnosti in poslovne skrivnosti; potekati bi morala v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo in zakonodajo Unije.
The Regulation on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC is also being amended to take account of the First Edition of the International Standards and Recommended Practices, and these two instruments are being complemented by a Delegated Act pursuant to Article 28c of Directive 2003/87/EC.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Climate Change Committee,
POGLAVJE I
Article 1
Ta uredba določa določbe za preverjanje poročil, predloženih v skladu z Direktivo 2003/87/ES, ter za akreditacijo in nadzor preveriteljev.
Subject matter
Ne glede na Uredbo (ES) št. 765/2008 vsebuje tudi določbe za vzajemno priznavanje preveriteljev in medsebojne strokovne preglede nacionalnih akreditacijskih organov v skladu s členom 15 Direktive 2003/87/ES.
This Regulation lays down provisions for the verification of reports submitted pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC and for the accreditation and supervision of verifiers.
Člen 2
This Regulation also specifies, without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, provisions for the mutual recognition of verifiers and peer evaluation of national accreditation bodies pursuant to Article 15 of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Področje uporabe
Article 2
Ta uredba se uporablja za preverjanje podatkov o emisijah toplogrednih plinov in tonskih kilometrih, nastalih po 1. januarju 2019 in sporočenih v skladu s členom 14 Direktive 2003/87/ES, ter za preverjanje podatkov, ki so pomembni za posodobitev predhodnih referenčnih vrednosti in za določitev brezplačne dodelitve za naprave.
This Regulation shall apply to the verification of greenhouse gas emissions and tonne-kilometre data occurring from 1 January 2019, reported pursuant to Article 14 of Directive 2003/87/EC, and to the verification of data relevant for the update of ex ante benchmarks and for the determination of free allocation to installations.
Opredelitev pojmov
Article 3
V tej uredbi se poleg opredelitev pojmov iz člena 3 Direktive 2003/87/ES in člena 3 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/2066 uporabljajo naslednje opredelitve pojmov:
Definitions
„tveganje pri odkrivanju“ pomeni tveganje, da preveritelj ne odkrije bistvene napačne navedbe;
For the purposes of this Regulation, in addition to the definitions laid down in Article 3 of Directive 2003/87/EC and Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, the following definitions shall apply:
„akreditacija“ pomeni potrditev s strani nacionalnega akreditacijskega organa, da preveritelj izpolnjuje zahteve, ki jih določajo harmonizirani standardi v smislu člena 2(9) Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008, in zahteve iz te uredbe za opravljanje preverjanja poročil upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova v skladu s to uredbo;
‘detection risk’ means the risk that the verifier does not detect a material misstatement;
„preveritelj“ pomeni pravno osebo ali drug pravni subjekt, ki opravlja dejavnosti preverjanja v skladu s to uredbo ter jo je akreditiral nacionalni akreditacijski organ na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008 in te uredbe, ali drugače pooblaščeno fizično osebo, ne glede na člen 5(2) navedene uredbe, v času izdaje poročila o preverjanju;
‘accreditation’ means attestation by a national accreditation body that a verifier meets the requirements set by harmonised standards, within the meaning of point 9 of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, and requirements set out in this Regulation to carry out the verification of an operator's or aircraft operator's report pursuant to this Regulation;
„preverjanje“ pomeni dejavnosti, ki jih opravi preveritelj, da bi izdal poročilo o preverjanju v skladu s to uredbo;