natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Member States should maintain discretion to set VAT rates for publications and restrict the scope of reduced VAT rates, including, subject to objective justification, where digital publications offer the same reading content.
Države članice bi morale ohraniti diskrecijsko pravico glede določanja stopenj DDV za publikacije in glede omejevanja obsega uporabe nižjih stopenj DDV, ob objektivni utemeljitvi vključno, kadar digitalne publikacije nudijo enako bralno vsebino.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely enabling Member States to apply the same VAT rates to electronically supplied publications as the VAT rates they currently apply to publications on any physical means of support, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer omogočiti državam članicam, da za elektronsko dobavljene publikacije uporabljajo stopnje DDV, ki so iste kot stopnje DDV, ki jih trenutno uporabljajo za publikacije na kakršnih koli fizičnih nosilcih, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
in Article 98(2), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
v členu 98(2) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘The reduced rates shall not apply to electronically supplied services with the exception of those falling under point (6) of Annex III.’;
„Nižje stopnje se ne uporabljajo za elektronsko opravljene storitve, z izjemo tistih iz točke 6 Priloge III.“;
in Article 99, the following paragraph is added:
v členu 99 se doda naslednji odstavek:
By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, and in addition to the rates referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 98, Member States which, on 1 January 2017, applied, in accordance with Union law, reduced rates lower than the minimum laid down in this Article or granted exemptions with deductibility of the VAT paid at the preceding stage to the supply of certain goods referred to in point (6) of Annex III, may also apply the same VAT treatment where that supply is supplied electronically, as referred to in point (6) of Annex III.’;
Z odstopanjem od odstavkov 1 in 2 tega člena ter poleg stopenj iz odstavka 1 člena 98 lahko države članice, ki so 1. januarja 2017 za dobavo določenega blaga iz točke 6 Priloge III v skladu s pravom Unije uporabljale nižje stopnje, ki so nižje od najnižje stopnje, določene v tem členu, ali odobravale oprostitve s pravico do odbitka DDV, plačanega v predhodni fazi, uporabljajo enako obravnavo z vidika DDV tudi, kadar je to blago dobavljeno elektronsko, kot je določeno v točki 6 Priloge III.“;
in Annex III, point (6) is replaced by the following:
v Prilogi III se točka 6 nadomesti z naslednjim:
supply, including on loan by libraries, of books, newspapers and periodicals either on physical means of support or supplied electronically or both (including brochures, leaflets and similar printed matter, children's picture, drawing or colouring books, music printed or in manuscript form, maps and hydrographic or similar charts), other than publications wholly or predominantly devoted to advertising and other than publications wholly or predominantly consisting of video content or audible music;’.
dobava, vključno s knjižnično izposojo, knjig, časopisov in periodičnih publikacij na fizičnih nosilcih ali dobavljenih elektronsko ali oboje (vključno z brošurami, letaki in podobnim tiskanim materialom, otroškimi slikanicami, knjigami za risanje ali pobarvankami, glasbenimi deli, tiskanimi ali v rokopisu, zemljevidi in hidrografskimi ali podobnimi kartami), razen publikacij, ki so v celoti ali v pretežnem delu namenjene oglaševanju, in publikacij, ki jih v celoti ali v pretežnem delu tvorijo video vsebine ali avdio glasbene vsebine;“.
OJ C 307, 30.8.2018, p. 205.
UL C 307, 30.8.2018, str. 205.
OJ C 345, 13.10.2017, p. 79.
UL C 345, 13.10.2017, str. 79.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 7 March 2017, RPO, C-390/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:174, paragraph 49.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 7. marca 2017, RPO, C-390/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:174, odstavek 49.
Directive (EU) 2018/1808 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva (EU) 2018/1808 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Directive 2010/13/EU on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) in view of changing market realities
o spremembi Direktive 2010/13/EU o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev (Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah) glede na spreminjajoče se tržne razmere
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 53(1) and Article 62 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 53(1) in člena 62 Pogodbe,
The last substantive amendment to Council Directive 89/552/EEC, subsequently codified by Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, was made in 2007 with the adoption of Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Zadnja bistvena sprememba Direktive Sveta 89/552/EGS, ki je bila naknadno kodificirana v Direktivi 2010/13/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, je bila izvedena leta 2007 s sprejetjem Direktive 2007/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Since then, the audiovisual media services market has evolved significantly and rapidly due to the ongoing convergence of television and internet services.
Trg avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev se je od takrat precej in zelo hitro spremenil zaradi stalne konvergence televizije in internetnih storitev.
Technical developments have allowed for new types of services and user experiences.
Tehnološki razvoj je omogočil nove vrste storitev in uporabniških izkušenj.
Viewing habits, particularly those of younger generations, have changed significantly.
Gledalske navade, zlasti mlajših generacij, so se znatno spremenile.
While the main TV screen remains an important device for sharing audiovisual experiences, many viewers have moved to other, portable devices to watch audiovisual content.
Medtem ko glavni televizijski zasloni ostajajo pomembno orodje za deljenje avdiovizualnih izkušenj, so mnogi gledalci začeli uporabljati druge, prenosne naprave za gledanje avdiovizualnih vsebin.
Traditional TV content still accounts for a major share of the average daily viewing time.
Tradicionalne televizijske vsebine še vedno predstavljajo velik delež povprečnega dnevnega časa gledanja.
However, new types of content, such as video clips or user-generated content, have gained an increasing importance and new players, including providers of video-on-demand services and video-sharing platforms, are now well-established.
Vendar so nove vrste vsebin, na primer video posnetki ali vsebine, ki jih ustvarijo uporabniki, vedno pomembnejše, novi udeleženci na trgu, vključno s ponudniki storitev videa na zahtevo in platform za izmenjavo videov, pa so zdaj že uveljavljeni.
This convergence of media requires an updated legal framework in order to reflect developments in the market and to achieve a balance between access to online content services, consumer protection and competitiveness.
Ta medijska konvergenca zahteva posodobljen pravni okvir, ki bo odražal razvoj na trgu in omogočil doseganje ravnovesja med dostopom do storitev spletnih vsebin, varstvom potrošnikov in konkurenčnostjo.
On 6 May 2015, the Commission adopted a communication entitled ‘A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe’ in which it announced a review of Directive 2010/13/EU.
Komisija je 6. maja 2015 sprejela sporočilo z naslovom „Strategija za enotni digitalni trg za Evropo“, v kateri je napovedala pregled Direktive 2010/13/EU.
Directive 2010/13/EU should remain applicable only to those services the principal purpose of which is the provision of programmes in order to inform, entertain or educate.
Direktivo 2010/13/EU bi bilo treba še naprej uporabljati samo za tiste storitve, katerih glavni namen je zagotavljanje programov za obveščanje, zabavo ali izobraževanje.
The principal purpose requirement should also be considered to be met if the service has audiovisual content and form which are dissociable from the main activity of the service provider, such as stand-alone parts of online newspapers featuring audiovisual programmes or user-generated videos where those parts can be considered dissociable from their main activity.
Za zahtevo v zvezi z glavnim namenom bi bilo treba tudi šteti, da je izpolnjena, če storitev ponuja avdiovizualno vsebino in obliko, ki je ločljiva od glavne dejavnosti ponudnika storitve, kot so samostojni deli spletnih časopisov, ki prikazujejo avdiovizualne programe ali videe, ki jih ustvarijo uporabniki, kadar se za navedene dele lahko šteje, da jih je mogoče ločiti od glavne dejavnosti ponudnika.
A service should be considered to be merely an indissociable complement to the main activity as a result of the links between the audiovisual offer and the main activity such as providing news in written form.
Storitev bi bilo treba obravnavati zgolj kot neločljivo dopolnitev glavne dejavnosti, kadar je to upravičeno glede na povezave med avdiovizualno ponudbo in glavno dejavnostjo, kot je ponudba novic v pisni obliki.
As such, channels or any other audiovisual services under the editorial responsibility of a provider can constitute audiovisual media services in themselves, even if they are offered on a video-sharing platform which is characterised by the absence of editorial responsibility.
Kanali ali kakršne koli druge avdiovizualne storitve pod uredniško odgovornostjo ponudnika lahko predstavljajo avdiovizualne medijske storitve, tudi če se nudijo na platformi za izmenjavo videov, za katero ponudniki nimajo uredniške odgovornosti.
In such cases, it will fall to the providers with editorial responsibility to comply with Directive 2010/13/EU.
V takih primerih bodo Direktivo 2010/13/EU morali upoštevati ponudniki z uredniško odgovornostjo.
Video-sharing platform services provide audiovisual content which is increasingly accessed by the general public, in particular by young people.
S storitvami platform za izmenjavo videov se ponujajo avdiovizualne vsebine, do katerih splošna javnost, zlasti mladi, vedno bolj dostopa.
This is also true with regard to social media services, which have become an important medium to share information and to entertain and educate, including by providing access to programmes and user-generated videos.
To velja tudi za storitve družbenih medijev, ki so postali pomembno sredstvo za izmenjavo informacij ter za zabavo in izobraževanje, med drugim tudi, ker omogočajo dostop do programov in videov, ki jih ustvarijo uporabniki.
Those social media services need to be included in the scope of Directive 2010/13/EU because they compete for the same audiences and revenues as audiovisual media services.
Te storitve družbenih medijev je treba vključiti v področje uporabe Direktive 2010/13/EU, ker konkurirajo za isto občinstvo in prihodke kot avdiovizualne medijske storitve.
Furthermore, they also have a considerable impact in that they facilitate the possibility for users to shape and influence the opinions of other users.
Poleg tega je učinek teh storitev precejšen tudi zato, ker uporabnikom omogočajo, da oblikujejo in vplivajo na mnenja drugih uporabnikov.
Therefore, in order to protect minors from harmful content and all citizens from incitement to hatred, violence and terrorism, those services should be covered by Directive 2010/13/EU to the extent that they meet the definition of a video-sharing platform service.
Zaradi varstva mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi vsebinami in vseh državljanov pred spodbujanjem sovraštva, nasilja in terorizma bi morale biti te storitve zajete v Direktivi 2010/13/EU, če zanje velja opredelitev storitve platforme za izmenjavo videov.
While the aim of Directive 2010/13/EU is not to regulate social media services as such, a social media service should be covered if the provision of programmes and user-generated videos constitutes an essential functionality of that service.
Namen Direktive 2010/13/EU sicer ni urejanje storitev družbenih medijev kot takih, vendar bi morala biti storitev družbenega medija zajeta, če je ponudba programov in videov, ki jih ustvarijo uporabniki, bistvena funkcija te storitve.
The provision of programmes and user-generated videos could be considered to constitute an essential functionality of the social media service if the audiovisual content is not merely ancillary to, or does not constitute a minor part of, the activities of that social media service.
Za ponudbo programov in videov, ki jih ustvarijo uporabniki, bi se lahko štelo, da predstavlja bistveno funkcijo storitve družbenega medija, če avdiovizualna vsebina ni le stranska dejavnost oziroma ne predstavlja le manjšega dela dejavnosti zadevne storitve družbenega medija.
In order to ensure clarity, effectiveness and consistency of implementation, the Commission should, where necessary, issue guidelines, after consulting the Contact Committee, on the practical application of the essential functionality criterion of the definition of a ‘video-sharing platform service’.
Zaradi jasnosti, učinkovitosti in doslednosti izvajanja bi morala Komisija po potrebi in po posvetovanju z odborom za stike izdati navodila o praktični uporabi merila bistvene funkcije opredelitve „storitve platforme za izmenjavo videov“.
Those guidelines should be drafted with due regard for the general public interest objectives to be achieved by the measures to be taken by video-sharing platform providers and the right to freedom of expression.
Ta navodila bi bilo treba pripraviti ob ustreznem upoštevanju ciljev splošnega javnega interesa, ki se dosežejo z ukrepi, ki jih sprejmejo ponudniki platform za izmenjavo videov, in pravice do svobode izražanja.
Where a dissociable section of a service constitutes a video-sharing platform service for the purposes of Directive 2010/13/EU, only that section should be covered by that Directive, and only as regards programmes and user-generated videos.
Kadar ločljivi del storitve predstavlja storitev platforme za izmenjavo videov za namene Direktive 2010/13/EU, bi morala navedena direktiva zajemati le ta del in samo programe in videe, ki jih ustvarijo uporabniki.
Video clips embedded in the editorial content of electronic versions of newspapers and magazines and animated images such as GIFs should not be covered by Directive 2010/13/EU.
Video posnetki, ki so del uredniške vsebine elektronskih različic časnikov in revij, ter animirane podobe, kot so GIF-i, ne bi smeli biti zajeti v Direktivi 2010/13/EU.
The definition of a video-sharing platform service should not cover non-economic activities, such as the provision of audiovisual content on private websites and non-commercial communities of interest.
V opredelitvi storitve platforme za izmenjavo videov ne bi smele biti zajete negospodarske dejavnosti, kot so zagotavljanje avdiovizualne vsebine na zasebnih spletnih mestih in nepridobitne interesne skupnosti.
In order to ensure the effective implementation of Directive 2010/13/EU, it is crucial that Member States establish and maintain up-to-date records of the media service providers and video-sharing platform providers under their jurisdiction and that they regularly share those records with their competent independent regulatory authorities or bodies and the Commission.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito izvajanje Direktive 2010/13/EU, je ključnega pomena, da države članice vzpostavijo in vzdržujejo posodobljene evidence ponudnikov medijskih storitev in ponudnikov platform za izmenjavo videov pod njihovo pristojnostjo ter si te evidence redno izmenjujejo z njihovimi pristojnimi neodvisnimi regulatornimi organi ali telesi ter Komisijo.
Those records should include information about the criteria on which jurisdiction is based.
Te evidence bi morale zajemati informacije o merilih, na katerih temelji pristojnost.
Establishing jurisdiction requires an assessment of factual situations against the criteria laid down in Directive 2010/13/EU.
Ugotavljanje pristojnosti zahteva oceno dejanskih okoliščin glede na merila iz Direktive 2010/13/EU.
The assessment of such factual situations might lead to conflicting results.
Ocena takih dejanskih okoliščin bi lahko privedla do nasprotujočih si rezultatov.
In applying the cooperation procedures provided for in that Directive, it is important that the Commission can base its findings on reliable facts.
Pri izvajanju postopkov sodelovanja, določenih v navedeni direktivi, je pomembno, da lahko Komisija svoje ugotovitve utemelji na zanesljivih dejstvih.
The European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services (ERGA) should therefore be empowered to provide opinions on jurisdiction upon the Commission's request.
Skupina evropskih regulatorjev za avdiovizualne medijske storitve (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupina ERGA) bi torej morala imeti pooblastila, da na zahtevo Komisije poda mnenja o pristojnosti.
Where the Commission, in applying those cooperation procedures, decides to consult ERGA, it should inform the Contact Committee, including about notifications received from Member States under those cooperation procedures and about ERGA's opinion.
Kadar se Komisija pri izvajanju teh postopkov sodelovanja odloči, da se bo posvetovala s skupino ERGA, bi morala obvestiti odbor za stike, tudi o uradnih obvestilih, prejetih od držav članic na podlagi teh postopkov sodelovanja, in o mnenju skupine ERGA.
The procedures and conditions for restricting freedom to provide and receive audiovisual media services should be the same for both linear and non-linear services.
Postopki in pogoji za omejevanje svobode pri zagotavljanju in sprejemanju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev bi morali biti enaki za linearne in nelinearne storitve.
In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘Court’), it is possible to restrict the freedom to provide services guaranteed under the Treaty for overriding reasons in the general public interest, such as obtaining a high level of consumer protection, provided that such restrictions are justified, proportionate and necessary.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sodišče) je mogoče omejiti svobodo opravljanja storitev, ki je zajamčena na podlagi Pogodbe, zaradi nujnih razlogov splošnega javnega interesa, kot je zagotavljanje visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov, pod pogojem, da so take omejitve utemeljene, sorazmerne in nujne.
Therefore, a Member State should be able to take certain measures to ensure respect for its consumer protection rules which do not fall in the fields coordinated by Directive 2010/13/EU.
Država članica bi torej morala imeti možnost sprejeti nekatere ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovila, da so upoštevana njena pravila o varstvu potrošnikov, ki ne spadajo na področja, ki jih usklajuje Direktiva 2010/13/EU.
Measures taken by a Member State to enforce its national consumer protection regime, including in relation to gambling advertising, would need to be justified, proportionate to the objective pursued, and necessary as required under the Court's case-law.
Ukrepi, ki jih sprejme država članica zaradi uveljavljanja svoje nacionalne ureditve za varstvo potrošnikov, tudi glede oglaševanja iger na srečo, bi morali biti utemeljeni, sorazmerni z zasledovanim ciljem in nujni, kar je tudi zahteva iz sodne prakse Sodišča.
In any event, a receiving Member State must not take any measures which would prevent the re-transmission, in its territory, of television broadcasts coming from another Member State.
Država članica sprejemnica ne sme v nobenem primeru sprejeti ukrepov, ki bi preprečevali, da bi se na njenem ozemlju ponovno prenašali televizijski programi iz druge države članice.
A Member State, when notifying the Commission that a media service provider has established itself in the Member State having jurisdiction in order to circumvent the stricter rules in the fields coordinated by Directive 2010/13/EU, which would be applicable to that provider if it were established in the notifying Member State, should adduce credible and duly substantiated evidence to that effect.
Ko država članica uradno obvesti Komisijo, da ima ponudnik medijskih storitev sedež v pristojni državi članici, zato da bi se izognil strožjim predpisom na področjih, ki jih usklajuje Direktiva 2010/13/EU, ki bi veljali za tega ponudnika, če bi imel sedež v državi članici, ki poda uradno obvestilo, bi morala predložiti verodostojne in ustrezno utemeljene dokaze o tem.
Such evidence should detail a set of corroborating facts allowing for such circumvention to be reasonably established.
Ti dokazi bi morali podrobno obrazložiti niz dodatnih podpornih dejstev, na podlagi katerih je mogoče utemeljeno ugotoviti, da gre za izogibanje.
In its Communication to the European Parliament and to the Council on Better Regulation for Better Results – an EU Agenda, the Commission stressed that, when considering policy solutions, it would consider both regulatory and non-regulatory means, modelled on the Community of practice and the Principles for Better Self- and Co-regulation.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom „Boljše pravno urejanje za boljše rezultate – agenda EU“ poudarila, da bo pri iskanju rešitev glede politik upoštevala tako regulativna kot neregulativna sredstva, ki bodo temeljila na praksi skupnosti ter načelih za boljšo samoregulacijo in koregulacijo.
A number of codes of conduct set up in the fields coordinated by Directive 2010/13/EU have proved to be well designed, in line with the Principles for Better Self- and Co-regulation.
Izkazalo se je, da je več pravil o ravnanju, vzpostavljenih na področjih, ki jih usklajuje Direktiva 2010/13/EU, dobro zasnovanih in v skladu z načeli za boljšo samoregulacijo in koregulacijo.
The existence of a legislative backstop was considered an important success factor in promoting compliance with a self- or co-regulatory code.
Obstoj zakonodajnih varovalnih mehanizmov velja za pomemben dejavnik uspeha pri spodbujanju usklajenosti s pravili samoregulacije ali koregulacije.
It is equally important that such codes establish specific targets and objectives allowing for the regular, transparent and independent monitoring and evaluation of the objectives aimed at by the codes of conduct.
Enako pomembno je tudi, da ta pravila postavljajo določene cilje, ki omogočajo redno, pregledno in neodvisno spremljanje ter ocenjevanje ciljev, h katerim so pravila ravnanja usmerjena.
The codes of conduct should also provide for effective enforcement.
Pravila ravnanja bi morala zagotavljati tudi učinkovito izvrševanje.
These principles should be followed by the self- and co-regulatory codes adopted in the fields coordinated by Directive 2010/13/EU.
Pravila samoregulacije in koregulacije, sprejeta na področjih, ki jih usklajuje Direktiva 2010/13/EU, bi morala slediti tem načelom.
Experience has shown that both self- and co-regulatory instruments, implemented in accordance with the different legal traditions of the Member States, can play an important role in delivering a high level of consumer protection.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da imajo lahko tako instrumenti samoregulacije kot tudi instrumenti koregulacije, ki se izvajajo v skladu z različnimi pravnimi tradicijami držav članic, pomembno vlogo pri doseganju visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov.