natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The first such programme was established by Decision No 243/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, setting out policy orientations and objectives for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the Union.
Nacionalne meje so vedno manj pomembne pri določanju optimalne uporabe radiofrekvenčnega spektra.
It should be possible for those policy orientations and objectives to refer to the availability and efficient use of radio spectrum necessary for the establishment and functioning of the internal market, in accordance with this Directive.
Zaradi nepotrebne razdrobljenosti nacionalnih politik so stroški za uporabnike radiofrekvenčnega spektra višji, njihove priložnosti na trgu izgubljene, lahko pa se tudi upočasnijo inovacije, kar bi škodilo pravilnemu delovanju notranjega trga ter vplivalo na potrošnike in celotno gospodarstvo.
National borders are increasingly irrelevant in determining optimal radio spectrum use.
Določbe o upravljanju radiofrekvenčnega spektra iz te direktive bi morale biti skladne z delom mednarodnih in regionalnih organizacij, ki se ukvarjajo z upravljanjem radiofrekvenčnega spektra, kot sta Mednarodna telekomunikacijska zveza (ITU) in Evropska konferenca poštnih in telekomunikacijskih uprav (CEPT), da se zagotovi učinkovito upravljanje in harmoniziranje uporabe radiofrekvenčnega spektra v vsej Uniji ter med državami članicami in drugimi člani ITU.
Undue fragmentation amongst national policies result in increased costs and lost market opportunities for radio spectrum users and slows down innovation to the detriment of the proper functioning of the internal market and prejudice to consumers and the economy as a whole.
V skladu z načelom ločevanja regulativnih in obratovalnih funkcij bi morale države članice zajamčiti neodvisnost nacionalnih regulativnih in drugih pristojnih organov, da bi zagotovile nepristranskost njihovih odločitev.
The radio spectrum management provisions of this Directive should be consistent with the work of international and regional organisations dealing with radio spectrum management, such as the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT), in order to ensure the effective management of and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum across the Union and between the Member States and other members of the ITU.
Ta zahteva po neodvisnosti ne posega v institucionalno avtonomijo in ustavne obveznosti držav članic niti v načelo nevtralnosti v zvezi s pravili držav članic o ureditvi lastninskopravnih razmerij iz člena 345 PDEU.
In accordance with the principle of the separation of regulatory and operational functions, Member States should guarantee the independence of the national regulatory and other competent authorities with a view to ensuring the impartiality of their decisions.
Nacionalni regulativni in drugi pristojni organi bi morali imeti pri opravljanju svojih nalog na voljo vse potrebne vire glede zaposlovanja, strokovnega znanja in izkušenj ter finančnih sredstev.
This requirement of independence is without prejudice to the institutional autonomy and constitutional obligations of the Member States or to the principle of neutrality with regard to the rules in Member States governing the system of property ownership laid down in Article 345 TFEU.
Nekatere naloge na podlagi direktive, kot je predhodna regulacija trga, vključno z naložitvijo obveznosti za dostop in medomrežno povezovanje, in reševanje sporov med podjetji, bi morali opravljati zgolj nacionalni regulativni organi, in sicer organi, ki so neodvisni od sektorja in zunanjih posegov ali političnega pritiska.
National regulatory and other competent authorities should be in possession of all the necessary resources, in terms of staffing, expertise, and financial means, for the performance of their tasks.
Če ni drugače določeno, bi morale države članice imeti možnost, dodeliti druge regulativne naloge, določene v tej direktivi, bodisi nacionalnim regulativnim organom bodisi drugim pristojnim organom.
Certain tasks pursuant to the Directive, such as ex ante market regulation, including the imposition of obligations for access and interconnection, and the resolution of disputes between undertakings are tasks which should be undertaken only by national regulatory authorities, namely, bodies which are independent both from the sector and from any external intervention or political pressure.
Pri prenosu bi si morale države članice prizadevati za stabilnost pristojnosti nacionalnih regulativnih organov, kar zadeva naloge, ki so bile dodeljene ob prenosu regulativnega okvira Unije za elektronske komunikacije, kot je bil spremenjen leta 2009, zlasti tistih, ki so povezane s konkurenco na trgu ali vstopom na trg.
Unless otherwise provided, Member States should be able to assign other regulatory tasks provided for in this Directive either to the national regulatory authorities or to other competent authorities.
Kadar so naloge dodeljene drugim pristojnim organom, bi se morali ti drugi pristojni organi pred sprejetjem odločitev posvetovati z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi.
In the course of transposition, Member States should promote the stability of competences of the national regulatory authorities with regard to the assignment of tasks which resulted from the transposition of the Union electronic communications regulatory framework as amended in 2009, in particular those related to market competition or market entry.
V skladu z načelom dobrega sodelovanja bi si morali nacionalni regulativni in drugi pristojni organi pri opravljanju svojih nalog izmenjevati informacije.
Where tasks are assigned to other competent authorities, those other competent authorities should seek to consult the national regulatory authorities before taking a decision.
Neodvisnost nacionalnih regulativnih organov je bila okrepljena v letu 2009 zaključenem pregledu regulativnega okvira za elektronske komunikacije, da bi se zagotovila učinkovitejša uporaba regulativnega okvira ter povečala njihova pooblastila in predvidljivost njihovih odločitev.
This Directive does not include substantive provisions on open internet access or roaming and is without prejudice to the allocation of competences to national regulatory authorities in Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council and in Regulation (EU) 2015/2120.
Zaradi takšnega zunanjega vpliva ni primerno, da bi nacionalni zakonodajni organ deloval kot nacionalni regulativni organ v regulativnem okviru.
However, this Directive provides, in addition, for national regulatory authorities to be competent for assessing and monitoring closely market access and competition issues which potentially affect the rights of end-users to an open internet access.
V ta namen je bilo treba vnaprej določiti pravila o razlogih za razrešitev vodje nacionalnega regulativnega organa, da bi se odpravil kakršen koli razumen dvom v neodvisnost tega organa in v njegovo neodvisnost od zunanjih dejavnikov.
The independence of the national regulatory authorities was strengthened in the review of the electronic communications regulatory framework completed in 2009 in order to ensure a more effective application of the regulatory framework and to increase their authority and the predictability of their decisions.
V izogib arbitrarnim razrešitvam bi moral imeti razrešeni član pravico, da zahteva, da pristojna sodišča preverijo, ali obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za razrešitev, kot so določeni v tej direktivi.
To that end, express provision had to be made in national law to ensure that, in the exercise of its tasks, a national regulatory authority is protected against external intervention or political pressure liable to jeopardise its independent assessment of matters coming before it.
Razrešitev bi se morala nanašati samo na osebne ali poklicne kvalifikacije vodje ali člana.
Such outside influence makes a national legislative body unsuited to act as a national regulatory authority under the regulatory framework.
Pomembno je, da imajo nacionalni regulativni organi svoj proračun, ki jim omogoča predvsem zaposlitev zadostnega števila usposobljenega osebja.
For that purpose, rules had to be laid down at the outset regarding the grounds for the dismissal of the head of the national regulatory authority in order to remove any reasonable doubt as to the neutrality of that body and its imperviousness to external factors.
Za zagotovitev preglednosti bi bilo treba ta proračun vsako leto objaviti.
In order to avoid arbitrary dismissals, dismissed members should have the right to request that the competent courts verify the existence of a valid reason to dismiss, among those provided for in this Directive.
V okviru svojega proračuna bi morali imeti avtonomijo pri upravljanju svojih človeških virov in finančnih sredstev.
Such dismissals should relate only to the personal or professional qualifications of the head or member.
Za zagotovitev nepristranskosti bi morale države članice, ki ohranijo lastništvo ali nadzor nad podjetji, ki prispevajo v proračun nacionalnih regulativnih ali drugih pristojnih organov prek upravnih pristojbin, poskrbeti za učinkovito strukturno ločevanje dejavnosti, ki so povezane z izvajanjem lastništva ali nadzora, in dejavnosti, ki so povezane z nadzorom proračuna.
It is important that national regulatory authorities have their own budget allowing them, in particular, to recruit a sufficient number of qualified staff.
Treba je nadalje okrepiti neodvisnost nacionalnih regulativnih organov, da bi zagotovili neodvisnost njihovega vodstva in članov od zunanjih pritiskov, in sicer z določitvijo minimalnih kvalifikacij, potrebnih za imenovanje, in minimalnega trajanja njihovega mandata.
In order to ensure transparency, that budget should be published annually.
Poleg tega bi morale države članice razmisliti o omejitvi možnosti podaljšanja mandata vodje ali članov upravnega odbora ter določiti ustrezen sistem rotacije za upravni odbor in višje vodstvo, da se zmanjša tveganje regulativne zlorabe, zagotovi kontinuiteta in okrepi neodvisnost.
Within the limits of their budget, they should have autonomy in managing their resources, human and financial.
To bi se lahko na primer uredilo tako, da se prvi člani kolegijskega organa imenujejo za različno dolga obdobja, zato da se njihovi mandati in mandati njihovih naslednikov ne bi iztekli ob istem času.
In order to ensure impartiality, Member States that retain ownership of, or control, undertakings contributing to the budget of the national regulatory or other competent authorities through administrative charges should ensure that there is effective structural separation of activities associated with the exercise of ownership or control from the exercise of control over the budget.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali odgovarjati za to, kako opravljajo svoje naloge, in o tem poročati.
There is a need to further reinforce the independence of the national regulatory authorities to ensure the imperviousness of its head and members to external pressure, by providing minimum appointment qualifications, and a minimum duration for their mandate.
Praviloma bi morali poročati letno in ne na podlagi ad hoc zahtevkov za poročanje, ki bi lahko omejili neodvisnost organov ali jih ovirali pri opravljanju nalog, če so nesorazmerni.
Furthermore, to address the risk of regulatory capture, ensure continuity and enhance independence, Member States should consider limiting the possibility of renewing the mandates of the head or members of the board and set up an appropriate rotation scheme for the board and the top management.
V skladu z nedavno sodno prakso Sodišča lahko obsežne ali brezpogojne obveznosti poročanja posredno vplivajo na neodvisnost organa.
This could be arranged, for instance, by appointing the first members of the collegiate body for different periods in order for their mandates, as well as that of their successors, not to lapse at the same moment.
Države članice bi morale nacionalne regulativne organe in druge pristojne organe sporočiti Komisiji.
National regulatory authorities should be accountable for, and should be required to report on, the way in which they are exercising their tasks.
Za organe, ki podeljujejo pravice do poti, bi moralo biti mogoče, da zadošča navedba enotne informacijske točke, vzpostavljene v skladu z Direktivo 2014/61/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
That obligation should normally take the form of an annual reporting obligation rather than ad hoc reporting requests, which, if disproportionate, could limit their independence or hinder them in the exercise of their tasks.
Za odobritev zagotavljanja elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev bi se moral uporabljati najmanj zahteven sistem odobritev, da se spodbudi razvoj novih komunikacijskih storitev ter vseevropskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev, ponudnikom storitev in potrošnikom pa omogoči, da izkoristijo ekonomijo obsega na notranjem trgu.
Indeed, according to the case-law of the Court of Justice, extensive or unconditional reporting obligations may indirectly affect the independence of an authority.
Koristi notranjega trga se lahko za ponudnike storitev in končne uporabnike najbolje dosežejo s splošno odobritvijo za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in elektronske komunikacijske storitve, razen medosebnih komunikacijskih storitev, neodvisnih od številke, ne da bi se zahtevala posebna odločba ali upravni akt nacionalnega regulativnega organa ter z omejitvijo postopkovnih zahtev na deklaratorno uradno obvestilo.
Member States should notify the Commission of the identity of the national regulatory and other competent authorities.
Kadar države članice od ponudnikov elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij ali storitev zahtevajo uradno obvestilo o začetku izvajanja njihove dejavnosti, zaradi takšnih uradnih obvestil ne bi smeli nastati upravni stroški za ponudnike, predložila pa bi se lahko prek vstopne točke na spletnem mestu pristojnih organov.
For authorities competent for granting rights of way, it should be possible to fulfil the notification requirement by a reference to the single information point established pursuant to Directive 2014/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Da bi podprli učinkovito čezmejno usklajevanje, zlasti za vseevropske operaterje, bi moral BEREC vzpostaviti in vzdrževati zbirko podatkov teh uradnih obvestil.
The least onerous authorisation system possible should be used to allow the provision of electronic communications networks and services in order to stimulate the development of new communications services and pan-European communications networks and services and to allow service providers and consumers to benefit from the economies of scale of the internal market.
Pristojni organi bi morali BEREC-u posredovati le popolna uradna obvestila.
The benefits of the internal market to service providers and end-users can be best achieved by general authorisation of electronic communications networks and of electronic communications services other than number-independent interpersonal communications services, without requiring any explicit decision or administrative act by the national regulatory authority and by limiting any procedural requirements to a declaratory notification only.
Države članice ne bi smele na noben način ovirati zagotavljanja omrežij ali storitev, tudi če je bilo predloženo nepopolno uradno obvestilo.
Where Member States require notification by providers of electronic communications networks or services when they start their activities, such notification should not entail administrative cost for the providers and could be made available via an entry point at the website of the competent authorities.
Uradno obvestilo bi moralo vsebovati samo izjavo o namenih ponudnika, da bo začel zagotavljati elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve.
In order to support effective cross-border coordination, in particular for pan-European operators, BEREC should establish and maintain a database of such notifications.
Od ponudnika bi se moralo zahtevati, da taki izjavi priloži le informacije iz te direktive.
Competent authorities should transmit only complete notifications to BEREC.
Države članice ne bi smele naložiti dodatnih ali ločenih zahtev glede uradnega obveščanja.
Member States should not impede the provision of networks or services in any way, including on grounds of incompleteness of a notification.
Za razliko od drugih kategorij elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev, kot so opredeljene v tej direktivi, se za medosebne komunikacijske storitve, neodvisne od številke, ne uporabljajo javni številski viri, prav tako pa tudi ne potekajo v javno zagotovljenem interoperabilnem sistemu.
Notifications should entail a mere declaration of the provider’s intention to commence the provision of electronic communications networks and services.
Zato ni primerno, da bi se za take vrste storitev uporabljal režim splošne odobritve.
A provider should be required to complement that declaration only with the information set out in this Directive.
Pri podelitvi pravic uporabe radiofrekvenčnega spektra, številskih virov ali pravic do namestitve zmogljivosti bi morali pristojni organi podjetja, katerim take pravice podelijo, obvestiti o ustreznih pogojih.
Member States should not impose additional or separate notification requirements.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da takšne pogoje za uporabo radiofrekvenčnega spektra določijo v individualnih pravicah uporabe ali v splošni odobritvi.
Contrary to the other categories of electronic communications networks and services as defined in this Directive, number-independent interpersonal communications services do not benefit from the use of public numbering resources and do not participate in a publicly assured interoperable ecosystem.
Splošna odobritev bi morala vsebovati samo pogoje, ki so značilni za področje elektronskih komunikacij.
It is therefore not appropriate to subject those types of services to the general authorisation regime.
Ne bi smela vključevati pogojev, ki se že uporabljajo na podlagi druge obstoječe nacionalne zakonodaje, ki ni značilna za področje komunikacij, zlasti glede varstva potrošnikov.
When granting rights of use for radio spectrum, for numbering resources or rights to install facilities, the competent authorities should inform the undertakings to which they grant such rights of the relevant conditions.
Pristojni organi bi morali imeti možnost, da na primer podjetja obvestijo o veljavnih okoljskih zahtevah in zahtevah prostorskega načrtovanja.
Member States should be able to lay down such conditions for the use of radio spectrum in individual rights of use or in the general authorisation.
Pogoji, naloženi na podlagi splošne odobritve, ne vplivajo na določitev prava, ki se uporablja v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 593/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
General authorisations should contain only conditions which are specific to the electronic communications sector.
Pogoji, ki bi lahko bili vezani na splošne odobritve, bi morali vsebovati tudi posebne pogoje o dostopnosti za končne uporabnike invalide in o potrebi po medsebojnem obveščanju javnih organov in služb za pomoč v sili in njihovem obveščanju širše javnosti pred in med večjimi nesrečami ter po njih.
They should not be made subject to conditions which are already applicable by virtue of other existing national law, in particular regarding consumer protection, which is not specific to the communications sector.
V take odobritve je treba izrecno vključiti pravice in obveznosti podjetij iz splošnih odobritev, da se po vsej Uniji zagotovijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji in omogočijo čezmejna pogajanja o medomrežnem povezovanju javnih elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij.
For instance, competent authorities should be able to inform undertakings about the applicable environmental and town-and-country-planning requirements.
Splošna odobritev daje podjetjem, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve za javnost, pravico, da se pogajajo o medomrežnem povezovanju pod pogoji iz te direktive.
Conditions imposed under the general authorisation do not affect the determination of applicable law pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Podjetja, ki ne zagotavljajo elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev za javnost, temveč za druge uporabnike, se lahko pogajajo o medomrežnem povezovanju pod komercialnimi pogoji.
The conditions that could be attached to general authorisations should cover specific conditions governing accessibility for end-users with disabilities and the need of public authorities and emergency services to communicate between themselves and with the general public before, during and after major disasters.
Pristojni organi bi morali pri določanju pogojev, ki jih povezujejo s splošno odobritvijo, in uveljavljanju upravnih pristojbin ustrezno upoštevati situacije, v katerih elektronska komunikacijska omrežja ali storitve ponujajo fizične osebe na neprofitni podlagi.
It is necessary to include the rights and obligations of undertakings under general authorisations explicitly in such authorisations in order to ensure a level playing field throughout the Union and to facilitate cross-border negotiation of interconnection between public electronic communications networks.
Pri elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežjih in storitvah, ki se ne zagotavljajo za javnost, je primerno, da se določi manj pogojev, če sploh, in da so manj strogi v primerjavi s pogoji, ki so upravičeni za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, ki se zagotavljajo za javnost.
General authorisations entitle undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services to the public to negotiate interconnection under the conditions of this Directive.
Posebne obveznosti, naložene podjetjem, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in elektronske komunikacijske storitve, v skladu s pravom Unije zaradi njihove določitve kot podjetja s pomembno tržno močjo, kot je opredeljeno v tej direktivi, bi se morale naložiti ločeno od splošnih pravic in obveznosti iz splošne odobritve.
Undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services other than to the public can negotiate interconnection on commercial terms.
Možno je, da podjetja, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitev potrebujejo potrdilo o svojih pravicah v okviru splošne odobritve za medomrežno povezovanje in pravicah do poti, zlasti zaradi lažjih pogajanj z regionalnimi ali lokalnimi upravami ali ponudniki storitev v drugih državah članicah.
Competent authorities should duly take into account, when attaching conditions to general authorisations and applying administrative charges, situations in which electronic communications networks or services are provided by natural persons on a not-for-profit basis.
Zato bi morali pristojni organi podjetjem izdati izjave, bodisi na zahtevo bodisi kot samodejni odgovor na uradno obvestilo v okviru splošne odobritve.
In the case of electronic communications networks and services not provided to the public it is appropriate to impose fewer and lighter conditions, if any, than are justified for electronic communications networks and services provided to the public.
Take izjave same po sebi ne bi smele pomeniti upravičenosti do pravic, prav tako pa od takšne izjave ne bi smele biti odvisne nobene pravice iz splošne odobritve, pravice uporabe ali uveljavljanje takih pravic.
Specific obligations imposed on undertakings providing electronic communications networks and electronic communications services in accordance with Union law by virtue of their designation as having significant market power as defined in this Directive should be imposed separately from the general rights and obligations under the general authorisation.
Obstajati bi morala možnost, da se podjetjem, ki zagotavljajo elektronske komunikacijske storitve naložijo upravne pristojbine za financiranje dejavnosti nacionalnega regulativnega ali drugega pristojnega organa za upravljanje splošnega odobritvenega sistema in podeljevanje pravic uporabe.