natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation (EU) No 1370/2013 provides that the quantitative limitation for buying-in skimmed milk powder at fixed price shall be set at zero tonne for the year 2019.
Uredba (EU) št. 1370/2013 določa, da količinske omejitve za odkup posnetega mleka v prahu po fiksni ceni znašajo nič ton za leto 2019.
In accordance with Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1370/2013, a tendering procedure is therefore to be opened for buying-in skimmed milk powder from the start of the public intervention period in 2019.
V skladu s členom 3(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1370/2013 bi bilo treba začeti razpisni postopek za odkup posnetega mleka v prahu z začetkom obdobja javne intervencije v letu 2019.
Section 3 of Chapter II of Title II of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 lays down rules for buying-in via a tendering procedure.
Oddelek 3 poglavja II naslova II Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/1240 določa pravila za odkup z razpisnim postopkom.
In accordance with Article 9(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 the time limit for Member States to notify the Commission of all admissible tenders should be set.
V skladu s členom 9(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/1240 bi bilo treba določiti rok za države članice, v katerem uradno obvestijo Komisijo o vseh dopustnih ponudbah.
In the interest of efficient administration, Member States should use, for their notifications to the Commission, information systems in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1183 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1185,
Za učinkovito upravljanje bi morale države članice za uradno obveščanje Komisije uporabljati informacijske sisteme v skladu z Delegirano uredbo Komisije (EU) 2017/1183 in Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2017/1185 –
A tendering procedure is opened from 1 March to 30 September 2019 for buying-in skimmed milk powder into intervention, under the conditions provided for in Section 3 of Chapter II of Title II of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 and in this Regulation.
Razpisni postopek se odpre za obdobje od 1. marca do 30. septembra 2019 za odkup posnetega mleka v prahu v obdobju intervencije pod pogoji iz oddelka 3 poglavja II naslova II Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/1240 in te uredbe.
The periods during which tenders may be submitted shall end at 11.00 (Brussels time) on the third Tuesday of the month.
Obdobja za oddajo ponudb se končajo tretji torek v mesecu ob 11. uri (po bruseljskem času).
However, in August, the closing date for the submission of tenders shall be the fourth Tuesday of the month at 11.00 (Brussels time).
V avgustu pa je rok za oddajo ponudb četrti torek v mesecu ob 11. uri (po bruseljskem času).
If Tuesday is a public holiday the time limit shall be 11.00 (Brussels time) on the previous working day.
Če je na torek državni praznik, se rok izteče ob 11. uri (po bruseljskem času) predhodni delovni dan.
The notification provided for in Article 9(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 shall be made by 16.00 (Brussels time) on the closing dates for the submission of tenders as referred to in Article 2 of this Regulation, in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1183 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1185.
Uradno obveščanje iz člena 9(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/1240 se opravi do 16. ure (po bruseljskem času) na rok za oddajo ponudb iz člena 2 te uredbe v skladu z Delegirano uredbo (EU) 2017/1183 in Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2017/1185.
The addresses of the paying agencies are available on the European Commission website http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/milk/policy-instruments/index_en.htm
Naslovi plačilnih agencij so na voljo na spletišču Evropske komisije https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/milk/policy-instruments/index_sl.htm
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/99
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2019/99
terminating the absorption reinvestigation concerning imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India without amending the measures in force
o zaključku ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije v zvezi z uvozom cevi iz nodularnega litega železa (imenovanega tudi sferoidno grafitno lito železo) s poreklom iz Indije brez spremembe veljavnih ukrepov
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 9(2) and 12 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), ter zlasti člena 9(2) in člena 12 Uredbe,
The measures currently in force are a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1369.
Trenutno veljavni ukrep je dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2016/388 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz cevi iz nodularnega litega železa (imenovanega tudi sferoidno grafitno lito železo) s poreklom iz Indije, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/1369.
The product concerned is also subject to a definitive countervailing duty imposed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/387.
Za zadevni izdelek velja tudi dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2016/387.
However, the countervailing duty is not subject to this reinvestigation.
Vendar izravnalna dajatev ni predmet te ponovne preiskave.
The Commission received a request for an absorption reinvestigation of the anti-dumping measures in force pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prejela zahtevek za ponovno preiskavo za ugotavljanje absorpcije v zvezi z veljavnimi protidampinškimi ukrepi v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged on 16 March 2018 by Saint-Gobain PAM, Saint-Gobain PAM Deutschland GmbH, Saint-Gobain PAM España S.A. and Duktus (Production) GmbH (‘the Applicant’), four Union producers representing more than 90 % of the total Union production of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron.
Zahtevek so 16. marca 2018 vložile družbe Saint-Gobain PAM, Saint-Gobain PAM Deutschland GmbH, Saint-Gobain PAM España S.A. in Duktus (Production) GmbH (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vložnik), tj. štirje proizvajalci Unije, ki predstavljajo več kot 90 % celotne proizvodnje cevi iz nodularnega litega železa v Uniji.
The Applicant had submitted sufficient evidence justifying a reopening of the anti-dumping investigation.
Vložnik je predložil zadostne dokaze, ki upravičujejo ponovni začetek protidampinške preiskave.
The Applicant claimed that resale prices to non-related customers in the Union had decreased after the original investigation period and following the imposition of the anti-dumping duty and that this has impeded the intended remedial effects of the measures in force.
Vložnik je trdil, da so se cene pri nadaljnji prodaji nepovezanim strankam v Uniji po obdobju prvotne preiskave in po uvedbi protidampinške dajatve znižale ter da to ovira načrtovane popravljalne učinke veljavnih ukrepov.
The evidence contained in the request indicated that the decrease in resale prices could not be explained by other factors such as changes in raw material prices.
Dokazi iz zahtevka kažejo, da znižanja cen pri nadaljnji prodaji ni mogoče razložiti z drugimi dejavniki, kot so spremembe cen surovin.
Reopening of the anti-dumping investigation
Ponovni začetek protidampinške preiskave
On 30 April 2018, the Commission announced the reopening of the anti-dumping investigation by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (‘the Notice of Reopening’).
Komisija je 30. aprila 2018 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o ponovnem začetku preiskave), napovedala ponovni začetek protidampinške preiskave.
The reinvestigation concerned the current anti-dumping duty of 14,1 % imposed on Jindal Saw Limited (‘Jindal’), and its related companies, and on ‘All other companies’ as set out in Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388.
Preiskava je zadevala obstoječo protidampinško dajatev v višini 14,1 %, ki je bila uvedena za družbo Jindal Saw Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Jindal) in njene povezane družbe ter za „vse druge družbe“, kot je določeno v členu 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/388.
In the Notice of Reopening, the Commission invited interested parties to contact it in order to participate in the reinvestigation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o ponovnem začetku preiskave zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj se ji javijo, če želijo sodelovati v ponovni preiskavi.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the Applicant, exporting producers and importers known to be concerned and the authorities of the country concerned about the absorption reinvestigation and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je o ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije posebej obvestila vložnika, proizvajalce izvoznike in uvoznike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter organe zadevne države in jih povabila k sodelovanju.
Jindal requested and was granted a hearing with the Commission.
Družba Jindal je zahtevala zaslišanje pred Komisijo, ki ji je bilo tudi odobreno.
Reinvestigating exporting producers
Ponovna preiskava proizvajalcev izvoznikov
The Commission sent a questionnaire to Jindal and its related companies and invited other exporting producers to make themselves known within 15 days from the publication of the Notice of Reopening.
Komisija je družbi Jindal in njenim povezanim družbam poslala vprašalnik ter povabila druge proizvajalce izvoznike, da se javijo v 15 dneh od objave obvestila o ponovnem začetku preiskave.
One Indian exporting producer, Electrosteel Castings Limited, came forward within the deadline but was not concerned by the reinvestigation, as it is not subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty based on Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388.
V roku se je javil en indijski proizvajalec izvoznik, tj. Electrosteel Castings Limited, vendar ga ponovna preiskava ni zadevala, saj zanj ne velja dokončna protidampinška dajatev na podlagi člena 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/388.
Two other Indian exporting producers, Electrotherm (India) Ltd and Tata Metaliks Limited, came forward after the deadline.
Po izteku roka sta se javila še dva indijska proizvajalca izvoznika, in sicer Electrotherm (India) Ltd in Tata Metaliks Limited.
These companies are subject to the rate applicable to ‘All other companies’ in Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388, which was set at the level of the individual anti-dumping duty for Jindal of 14,1 % in the original investigation.
Za ti družbi velja stopnja, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“ iz člena 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/388, ki je bila za družbo Jindal v prvotni preiskavi določena na ravni posamezne protidampinške dajatve v višini 14,1 %.
Both companies had negligible Union sales in the absorption reinvestigation period.
Obe družbi sta imeli v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije zanemarljivo prodajo v Uniji.
In view of the fact that these companies came forward too late, the Commission did not send them a questionnaire.
Ker sta se družbi javili prepozno, jima Komisija ni poslala vprašalnika.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Reopening.
Da bi se lahko Komisija odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je nepovezane uvoznike pozvala, naj predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o ponovnem začetku preiskave.
None came forward.
Javil se ni nihče.
The Commission sent a questionnaire to Jindal to which it replied.
Komisija je družbi Jindal poslala vprašalnik, na katerega je ta odgovorila.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the purpose of this reinvestigation.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za to ponovno preiskavo.
A verification visit pursuant to Article 16 of the basic Regulation was carried out at the premises of the following company: Jindal Saw Italia SpA, Trieste, Italy (‘Jindal Italy’).
Preveritveni obiski na podlagi člena 16 osnovne uredbe so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednje družbe: Jindal Saw Italia SpA, Trieste, Italija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Jindal Italia).
Jindal Italy is the only related company of Jindal in the Union (see section 3.1).
Družba Jindal Italia je edina povezana družba družbe Jindal v Uniji (glej oddelek 3.1).
On 24 October 2018, the Commission sent all interested parties a disclosure document which contained the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission proposed to terminate the reinvestigation.
Komisija je 24. oktobra 2018 vsem zainteresiranim stranem poslala dokument o razkritju, v katerem so bili navedeni bistvena dejstva in premisleki, na podlagi katerih je Komisija predlagala zaključek ponovne preiskave.
Interested parties were informed of the deadline within which they could comment on the disclosure.
Zainteresirane strani so bile seznanjene z rokom, v katerem so lahko predložile pripombe na razkritje.
Two entities, the Applicant and Jindal, reacted to the disclosure.
Na razkritje sta se odzvala dva subjekta, in sicer vložnik in družba Jindal.
The Applicant requested and was granted a hearing with the Commission.
Vložnik je zahteval zaslišanje pred Komisijo, ki mu je bilo tudi odobreno.
The comments submitted by interested parties were considered and taken into account where warranted.
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani so se proučile in upoštevale, kadar je bilo to primerno.
Periods covered by the absorption reinvestigation
Obdobja, zajeta v ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije
The period concerned was 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2018.
Zadevni izdelek je opredeljen kot cevi iz nodularnega litega železa (imenovanega tudi sferoidno grafitno lito železo), razen cevi iz nodularnega litega železa brez notranje in zunanje prevleke (v nadaljnjem besedilu: gole cevi), ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex73030010 in ex73030090 (oznaki TARIC 7303001010 in 7303009010), s poreklom iz Indije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek).
The original investigation period (‘OIP’) was 1 October 2013 to 30 September 2014.
UGOTOVITVE
PRODUCT CONCERNED
Cilj ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe je ugotoviti, ali so se od uvedbe prvotnih ukrepov izvozne cene znižale oziroma ali ni bilo gibanja ali zadostnega gibanja cen pri nadaljnji prodaji ali vseh nadaljnjih prodajnih cen zadevnega izdelka v Uniji.
The product concerned is defined as tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron), with the exclusion of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron without internal and external coating (‘bare pipes’), currently falling within CN codes ex73030010 and ex73030090 (TARIC codes 7303001010, 7303009010), originating in India (‘the product concerned’).
Če bo ugotovljeno, da bi zaradi ukrepa moralo priti do gibanja cen, se bodo nato zaradi odprave škode, predhodno ugotovljene v skladu s členom 3 osnovne uredbe, izvozne cene ponovno proučile v skladu s členom 2 osnovne uredbe, stopnje dampinga pa se bodo ponovno izračunale, da se upoštevajo ponovno proučene cene.
FINDINGS
Spremembe poslovnega modela družbe Jindal in prodaje v Uniji
An absorption reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation aims at establishing whether or not export prices have decreased or whether there has been no movement, or insufficient movement, in resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Union of the product concerned since the imposition of the original measures.
Po uvedbi ukrepov se je prodaja družbe Jindal v Uniji v primerjavi z obdobjem prvotne preiskave zmanjšala za približno 90 %.
As a second step, if it is concluded that the measure should have led to movements in such prices, then, in order to remove the injury previously established in accordance with Article 3 of the basic Regulation, export prices shall be reassessed in accordance with Article 2 of the basic Regulation and dumping margins shall be recalculated to take account of the reassessed export prices.
Njena prodaja v Uniji v višini [manj kot 2000 metričnih ton] zdaj znaša [manj kot 0,5 %] potrošnje Unije.
Changes to Jindal's business model and Union sales
Poleg tega se je od obdobja prvotne preiskave spremenila prodajna struktura družbe Jindal.
Following the imposition of the measures, sales of Jindal to the Union have dropped by around 90 % by comparison with the OIP.
Družba Jindal je imela v obdobju prvotne preiskave tri povezane prodajne družbe v Združenem kraljestvu, Španiji in Italiji, v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije pa je ostala samo še povezana družba v Italiji.
Jindal's Union sales, at [less than 2000 metric tonnes], now account for [less than 0,5 %] of Union consumption.
Družba Jindal Italia predstavlja veliko večino prodaje družbe Jindal v Uniji, pri čemer je neposreden izvoz omejen.
Furthermore, changes took place in Jindal's sales structure since the OIP.
Poleg tega je imela družba Jindal v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije v primerjavi z obdobjem prvotne preiskave znatno manj strank ([manj kot polovico v primerjavi z obdobjem prvotne preiskave]) v manj državah članicah ([manj kot polovici v primerjavi z obdobjem prvotne preiskave]).
In the OIP Jindal had three related sales companies in the UK, Spain and Italy respectively, while in the RIP only the Italian related company remains.
Družba Jindal je prodala tudi veliko manj vrst izdelka: [manj kot polovico v primerjavi z obdobjem prvotne preiskave].
Jindal Italy accounts for the large majority of Jindal's sales to the Union, with only limited direct exports.
Analiza gibanja cen
Furthermore, in the RIP Jindal sold to significantly fewer clients ([less than half by comparison with the OIP]) in fewer Member States ([less than half by comparison with the OIP]) than in the original investigation.
Komisija pri ugotavljanju, ali so se izvozne cene znižale, običajno določi izvozne cene za vsakega pregledanega proizvajalca izvoznika v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije ter te cene primerja z ustreznimi izvoznimi cenami, ki so bile ugotovljene za obdobje prvotne preiskave.
Jindal also sold a much lower number of product types (PCNs): [less than half by comparison with the OIP].
Vendar zaradi zelo majhnega obsega neposrednega izvoza, kot je opisan v uvodni izjavi 21, neposrednih izvoznih cen družbe Jindal neodvisnim strankam v Uniji ni bilo mogoče smiselno primerjati.
Analysis of price developments
Ker mora analiza cen temeljiti na ceni za prvo neodvisno stranko in ker povezani družbi družbe Jindal v Španiji in Združenem kraljestvu ne obstajata več, je analiza Komisije temeljila samo na ceni družbe Jindal Italia pri nadaljnji prodaji prvi nepovezani stranki.
When establishing whether there was a decrease in export prices the Commission normally establishes for each examined exporting producer its export prices during the RIP and compares these prices to the corresponding export prices determined in the OIP.
Glede na zelo omejen obseg, ki je bil upoštevan, in spremembe vrst izdelka, izpostavljene v oddelku 3.1, primerjava po posameznih vrstah izdelka ni bila reprezentativna in zato ni mogla privesti do smiselne analize.
However, given very low volumes of direct export sales as described in recital (21), the direct export price from Jindal to the Union to independent customers could not be meaningfully compared.
Komisija je za okvirno analizo primerjala splošno tehtano povprečno ceno na kilogram za vse vrste izdelka za prodajo s strani družbe Jindal Italia prvi nepovezani stranki.
As the analysis of prices should be based on the price to the first independent customer, and given that Jindal's related companies in Spain and the UK no longer exist, the Commission based its analysis only on the resale price of Jindal Italy to the first unrelated customer.
Ugotovila je, da se je cena družbe Jindal pri nadaljnji prodaji od obdobja ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije do obdobja prvotne preiskave v povprečju zvišala za [več kot 10 %], kar predstavlja [več kot 80 %] 14,1-odstotne protidampinške dajatve.
In view of the very limited volumes considered and of the changes in product types highlighted in section 3.1, any comparison on a PCN to PCN basis was unrepresentative and could thus not lead to a meaningful analysis.
Poleg tega je del prodaje družbe Jindal v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije potekal na podlagi cen, določenih v razpisih pred uvedbo ukrepov.
For an indicative analysis, the Commission conducted a comparison on an overall weighted average price per kilogram for all product types for sales made by Jindal Italy to the first unrelated customer.
Ni mogoče pričakovati, da bi se prodajna cena za tako prodajo spremenila, zato ima primerjava cen le omejen pomen.
It found that Jindal's resale price on average increased by [more than 10 %] between the RIP and the OIP, thus reflecting [more than 80 %] of the 14,1 % anti-dumping duty.
Po razkritju je vložnik predložil različne pripombe.
In addition, part of Jindal's sales in the RIP took place based on prices fixed in tenders before the imposition of the measures.
Prvič, trdil je, da bi morala Komisija upoštevati tri zunanje dejavnike: izravnalno dajatev v višini 8,7 %, konvencionalno carino v višini 3,2 % in menjalni tečaj med INR in EUR.
It cannot be expected that the sales price for such sales would have changed, and therefore a price comparison is of limited relevance.
Glede izravnalne dajatve je vložnik trdil, da je treba zvišanje cene pri nadaljnji prodaji pripisati predvsem izravnalni dajatvi v višini do 8,7 %.
Following disclosure, the Applicant submitted various claims.
Komisija je opozorila, da je ponovna preiskava omejena na domnevno absorpcijo protidampinške dajatve.
First, the Applicant argued that the Commission should take into account three external factors: the countervailing duty of 8,7 %, the conventional customs duty of 3,2 %, and the exchange rate between INR and EUR.
Kar zadeva konvencionalno carino za zadevni izdelek, je vložnik opozoril, da se je ta od obdobja prvotne preiskave do obdobja ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije spremenila z 0 % na 3,2 %.
The Commission noted that the reinvestigation is limited to alleged absorption of the anti-dumping duty.
Vložnik je trdil, da bi bilo treba to spremembo upoštevati pri oceni zvišanja cene pri nadaljnji prodaji.
In any event, the findings in this investigation show that Jindal Italy increased its prices beyond the level of the countervailing duty imposed in 2016.
Ker se ugotovitev o zadostnem zvišanju cen z nobenim od obeh pristopov ne bi spremenila, je pustila odprto vprašanje, ali bi bilo treba v tem primeru zvišanje konvencionalne carine upoštevati pri primerjavi cen ali ne.
Consequently, this claim was rejected.
Glede menjalnega tečaja je vložnik trdil, da bi bilo treba upoštevati spremembo menjalnega tečaja med EUR in INR.
The Applicant argued that this change should be taken into account in the assessment of the increase of the resale price.
Vendar je v tem primeru primerjava temeljila na ceni pri nadaljnji prodaji, ki je bila tako v obdobju prvotne preiskave kot tudi v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije fakturirana v EUR, tako da je bila za oceno zvišanja cen uporabljena ista valuta.
The Commission confirmed that the duty had already been taken into account in the analysis disclosed to interested parties.
Zato ni bila upravičena nobena prilagoditev zaradi sprememb menjalnega tečaja med INR in EUR in zahteva je bila zavrnjena.