natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Indeed, after an assessment of the workload expected to be generated by the requests, the Commission decided that no individual treatment could be granted at definitive stage as the number of entities to be additionally investigated and the number of different locations to be visited for the verification would have been unduly burdensome and prevented completion of the investigation in good time in view of the timeline of the investigation and the resources available on the Commission's side.
Komisija je namreč po oceni pričakovane delovne obremenitve zaradi zahtevkov sklenila, da ni mogoče dovoliti individualne obravnave v zaključni fazi, saj bi število subjektov, ki bi morali biti dodatno preiskani, in število različnih lokacij, ki bi jih bilo treba obiskati za preverjanje, pomenila preveliko breme in onemogočila pravočasen zaključek preiskave glede na časovni okvir preiskave in vire, ki so na voljo Komisiji.
The Commission already investigated 22 entities in seven locations as part of the sample.
Komisija je že preiskala 22 subjektov na sedmih lokacijah kot del vzorca.
Moreover, as noted in recital 9 above, important verifications which are normally performed at the provisional stage of an investigation, had already to be postponed to the definitive stage of the investigation given the size of the case and the number of interested parties to be investigated in this case, thus putting an additional burden on the investigation.
Poleg tega je bilo treba, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 9 zgoraj, zaradi obsežnosti primera in števila zainteresiranih strani, ki jih je bilo treba preiskati v tem primeru, pomembna preverjanja, ki se običajno izvajajo v začasni fazi preiskave, prestaviti v zaključno fazo preiskave, kar je bilo dodatno breme za preiskavo.
It is also recalled that the sample of the exporting producers accounts for almost half of the total Chinese import volumes of the product concerned to the Union during the investigation period.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov predstavlja skoraj polovico celotnega obsega kitajskega uvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v obdobju preiskave.
The groups requesting individual treatment would account altogether for less than 5 % of the total imports.
Skupine, ki so zahtevale individualno obravnavo, bi skupaj predstavljale manj kot 5 % skupnega uvoza.
Finally, the Commission also refers to the principle of non-discrimination that could be breached if only one additional group is individually examined and not the other two companies/groups outside the sample who also requested individual examination.
Nazadnje se Komisija sklicuje tudi na načelo nediskriminacije, ki bi lahko bilo prekršeno, če bi bila individualno preiskana samo ena dodatna skupina, drugi dve družbi/skupini, ki nista vključeni v vzorec in ki sta tudi zahtevali individualno preiskavo, pa ne.
Following definitive disclosure, the group of companies referred in recital 13 above reiterated its request for individual examination on the grounds that (i) it is a non-integrated producer of the product concerned with different cost structure and profit composition from the exporting producers in the sample; (ii) the Commission, allegedly, did not intend to give an earlier decision on the individual examination in order to deprive interested parties of the opportunity to provide comments on the issue; (iii) according to WTO law, refusal of requests for individual examination should be an exception; (iv) the Commission had verified all sampled exporting producers before April 2017 and (v) the principle of non-discrimination is not an issue since, according to case law, the Commission should have assessed the MET claims from the other two companies/groups outside the sample who also requested individual examination.
Po dokončnem razkritju je skupina družb, navedena v uvodni izjavi 13 zgoraj, ponovila svoj zahtevek za individualno preiskavo, ker (i) je neintegrirani proizvajalec zadevnega izdelka z drugačno stroškovno strukturo in sestavo dobička od proizvajalcev izvoznikov, vključenih v vzorec; (ii) Komisija domnevno ni nameravala prej odločiti o individualni preiskavi, da bi zainteresiranim stranem onemogočila predložitev pripomb o tem vprašanju; (iii) bi morali biti v skladu s pravom STO zahtevki za individualno preiskavo zavrnjeni le izjemoma; (iv) je Komisija preverila vse vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike pred aprilom 2017 in (v) načelo nediskriminacije ni pomembno, saj bi morala Komisija v skladu s sodno prakso proučiti zahtevke za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo drugih dveh družb/skupin, ki nista vključeni v vzorec in ki sta tudi zahtevali individualno preiskavo.
None of the grounds laid down above undermines the overall conclusion that the examination of individual examination requests was not possible.
Nobeden od zgoraj navedenih razlogov ne izpodbija končnega sklepa, da obravnava zahtevkov za individualno preiskavo ni bila mogoča.
Firstly, the alleged difference in cost structure and profit composition cannot on its own justify a request for individual examination.
Prvič, domnevna razlika v stroškovni strukturi in sestavi dobička ne more sama po sebi upravičiti zahteve za individualno preiskavo.
Rather, all companies having requested an individual examination are in the same factual and legal situation.
Nasprotno, vse družbe, ki so zaprosile za individualno obravnavo, so v enakem dejanskem in pravnem položaju.
In addition, the company always can ask for a refund or an interim review, if the applicable conditions are met.
Poleg tega lahko podjetje vedno zahteva povračilo ali vmesni pregled, če so izpolnjeni veljavni pogoji.
Secondly, the Commission never prevented interested parties from providing comments on the issue.
Drugič, Komisija zainteresiranim stranem nikoli ni preprečevala, da bi predložile pripombe o tem vprašanju.
Thirdly, the Commission recalls that WTO law clearly states, in Article 6.10 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, that in cases where the number of [exporters] involved is so large as to make [individual examination] impracticable the authorities may limit their examination to a reasonable number of interested parties by using samples.
Tretjič, Komisija opozarja, da je v pravu STO, v členu 6.10 protidampinškega sporazuma, jasno določeno, da se lahko v primerih, v katerih je število [izvoznikov] tako veliko, da bi bile [individualne preiskave] neizvedljive, organi pri njihovem proučevanju omejijo na razumno število zainteresiranih strani z uporabo vzorcev.
Applying this rule does not discourage voluntary replies.
Uporaba tega pravila pa ne odvrača od prostovoljnih odgovorov.
Fourthly, the Commission completed the verification of the sampled groups only in October 2017.
Četrtič, Komisija je preverjanje vzorčenih skupin končala šele oktobra 2017.
Lastly, the Commission notes that the burden of carrying out the analyses of requests from three additional companies/groups was developed ad abundum in the provisional Regulation and the recitals 15 to 17 above.
Nazadnje, Komisija ugotavlja, da je bilo breme analiziranja zahtevkov treh dodatnih družb/skupin pojasnjeno ad abundum v začasni uredbi in zgornjih uvodnih izjavah od 15 do 17.
In the absence of any further comments concerning individual examination, the provisional findings set out in recitals 21 to 24 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi z individualno preiskavo, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 21 do 24 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Market economy treatment (‘MET’)
Tržnogospodarska obravnava
Recital 25 of the provisional Regulation noted that two groups of non-sampled cooperating producers in the PRC had submitted MET claim forms within their request for individual treatment.
V uvodni izjavi 25 začasne uredbe je navedeno, da sta dve skupini nevzorčenih sodelujočih proizvajalcev iz LRK v svojih zahtevkih za individualno obravnavo predložili zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo.
As the Commission decided not to grant individual treatment to these groups, their MET claims were not assessed.
Ker je Komisija odločila, da tema skupinama ne odobri individualne obravnave, njuna zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo nista bila proučena.
In the absence of any comments concerning MET, the provisional findings set out in recital 25 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb v zvezi s tržnogospodarsko obravnavo, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 25 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Recital 31 of the provisional Regulation set out the definition of the product concerned.
Uvodna izjava 31 začasne uredbe določa opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
This definition is definitively confirmed.
Ta opredelitev se dokončno potrdi.
As mentioned at recital 34 of the provisional Regulation certain parties continued to request clarification on the definition of the product concerned.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 34 začasne uredbe, so nekatere strani še naprej zahtevale pojasnila o opredelitvi zadevnega izdelka.
Such clarifications were issued on a case by case basis.
Takšna pojasnila so bila izdana za vsak primer posebej.
It is clarified that TARIC code 7225990035 that was in recital 31 and Article 1 of the provisional Regulation should be removed as it was included by mistake since it was already allocated to another product subject under measures.
Pojasnjeno je, da bi bilo treba črtati oznako TARIC 7225990035, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 31 in členu 1 začasne uredbe, saj je bila vključena pomotoma in je bila že dodeljena drugemu izdelku, za katerega veljajo ukrepi.
This code has not been used by importers to the Union market of the product concerned.
Uvozniki zadevnega izdelka na trg Unije te oznake niso uporabili.
In the absence of any comments regarding the product concerned and the like product, the conclusions reached in recitals 31 to 39 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 31 do 39 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The details for the calculation of the normal value are set out in recitals 40 to 51 of the provisional Regulation.
Podrobni podatki za izračun normalne vrednosti so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 40 do 51 začasne uredbe.
After the imposition of provisional measures, CISA claimed that the difference between the injury and dumping margins raised doubts as to the accuracy of the Commission's findings and calculations, or the choice of the analogue country.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je združenje CISA trdilo, da razlika med škodo in stopnjo dampinga vzbuja dvome o točnosti ugotovitev in izračunov Komisije ali izbiri primerljive države.
CISA estimated that the normal value in the analogue country was 21 % higher than the target price for the Union industry and that the average sale price of the analogue country producer was higher than the (already high) prices in Brazil.
Ocenilo je, da je normalna vrednost v primerljivi državi za 21 % višja od ciljne cene za industrijo Unije in da so povprečne prodajne cene proizvajalca iz primerljive države višje od (že zdaj visokih) cen v Braziliji.
According to CISA, the fact that normal value was constructed for most sales of the sampled exporting producers also casted doubts about the choice of the analogue country or the quality of the data obtained in Brazil.
Združenje CISA je trdilo, da se zato, ker je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana za večino prodaje vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, porajajo tudi pomisleki glede izbire primerljive države ali kakovosti podatkov, pridobljenih v Braziliji.
Ultimately, CISA asked the Commission to invalidate the choice of Brazil as an analogue country.
Na koncu je Komisijo pozvalo, naj razveljavi izbiro Brazilije kot primerljive države.
The last claim seems to contradict CISA's statement of 24 March 2017 that Brazil appeared ‘to be the best choice among several candidate countries, i.e. Canada, Australia and Brazil, especially after comparing the size of each market and market power of the cooperating producers’.
Zadnja trditev združenja CISA se zdi v nasprotju z izjavo z dne 24. marca 2017, da se „Brazilija zdi najustreznejša izbira med več državami kandidatkami, tj. Kanado, Avstralijo in Brazilijo, zlasti po primerjavi velikosti njihovih trgov in tržne moči sodelujočih proizvajalcev“.
On substance, Brazil is a competitive market with three domestic producers and substantial imports, predominantly from China, representing a Brazilian domestic market share of around 15 %.
V bistvu je Brazilija konkurenčen trg s tremi domačimi proizvajalci in obsežnim uvozom, pretežno iz Kitajske, ki predstavlja približno 15 % brazilskega domačega tržnega deleža.
It has no anti-dumping and countervailing measures in force and its companies operate under normal conditions of competition.
Nima veljavnih protidampinških in izravnalnih ukrepov in njena podjetja delujejo v običajnih konkurenčnih razmerah.
Therefore, Brazil is an appropriate choice.
Zato je Brazilija ustrezna izbira.
As to the quality of data and calculations, the data of the analogue country producer are verified for accuracy and they were found reliable.
Kar zadeva kakovost podatkov in izračunov, je bila točnost podatkov proizvajalca iz primerljive države preverjena in ugotovljeno je bilo, da so zanesljivi.
The calculations are performed in line with the applicable legal rules of the basic Regulation.
Izračuni so bili opravljeni v skladu z veljavnimi pravnimi pravili iz osnovne uredbe.
They are factually correct.
Zato velja, da so točni.
Following provisional disclosure, one sampled group of exporting producers noted that normal value had to be constructed for more than 75 % of its sales volume to the Union and indicated that this cast serious doubt on the comparability of the product types sold on the analogue country domestic market.
Po začasnem razkritju je ena vzorčena skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov ugotovila, da je bilo treba normalno vrednost konstruirati za več kot 75 % obsega njene prodaje v Unijo, in navedla, da to vzbuja resen dvom o primerljivosti vrst izdelka, ki se prodajajo na domačem trgu primerljive države.
In this regard, it should be noted that the product scope includes a large range of product types presenting various characteristics.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da obseg izdelka zajema širok nabor vrst izdelka z različnimi značilnostmi.
The fact that certain Brazilian product types were not sold in sufficient quantities or could not be matched with the Chinese product types exported to the Union does not mean that the Brazilian product types were not comparable.
Dejstvo, da nekatere brazilske vrste izdelka niso bile prodane v zadostnih količinah ali jih ni bilo mogoče povezati s kitajskimi vrstami izdelka, izvoženimi v Unijo, ne pomeni, da brazilske vrste izdelka niso primerljive.
Indeed, the product types produced by the Brazilian producer belong to the same product group and could to a certain extent be matched with those exported by the sampled Chinese exporting producers to the Union.
Dejansko vrste izdelkov, ki jih proizvaja brazilski proizvajalec, spadajo v isto skupino izdelkov in jih je mogoče deloma primerjati s tistimi, ki jih vzorčeni kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki izvažajo v Unijo.
Furthermore, for exported products which could not be directly matched with Brazilian normal values, normal value was adjusted to take account of all physical differences (in particular, as concerns width, surface quality and coating mass), on the basis of the analogue country producer's price list which indeed foresaw such differences.
Poleg tega je bila normalna vrednost za izvožene izdelke, ki jih ni bilo mogoče neposredno primerjati z brazilskimi normalnimi vrednostmi, prilagojena, da bi se upoštevale vse fizikalne razlike (zlasti, kar zadeva širino, kakovost površine in maso premaza), na podlagi cenika proizvajalca iz primerljive države, v katerem so bile dejansko predvidene take razlike.
This also means that the product types for which the normal value was constructed were indeed part of the product portfolio of the analogue country producer, just like they were for the Chinese sampled parties.
To pomeni tudi, da so bile vrste izdelka, za katere je bila konstruirana normalna vrednost, dejansko del portfelja izdelkov proizvajalca iz primerljive države, podobno kot za kitajske vzorčene strani.
After final disclosure, the party went further and requested the exact value of each of the adjustments for physical differences.
Po dokončnem razkritju je stran zahtevala tudi natančne vrednosti vsake prilagoditve za fizikalne razlike.
This claim is addressed in recital 35 below.
Ta trditev je obravnavana v uvodni izjavi 35 v nadaljevanju.
The same party also claimed that no meaningful data relating to the normal value was disclosed.
Ista stran je trdila še, da ni bilo pomembnih podatkov v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo, ki je bila razkrita.
The party asked for access to the entire data via its lawyers on the grounds that the principle of rights of defence requires that the addressees of decisions which significantly affect their interests should be placed in a position in which in they may effectively make known their views on the evidence on which the contested decision is based.
Prek svojih odvetnikov je prosila za dostop do vseh podatkov, saj načelo pravice do obrambe zahteva, da naj bi bili naslovniki odločb, ki pomembno vplivajo na njihove interese, v položaju, v katerem lahko učinkovito izrazijo svoja stališča o dokazih, na katerih temelji izpodbijana odločba.
The normal value calculation is based on data relating to the sales and costs of the analogue country producer.
Izračun normalne vrednosti temelji na podatkih, ki se nanašajo na prodajo in stroške proizvajalca iz primerljive države.
The analogue country producer requested and justified confidentiality treatment of its sales and costs data for the purposes of this investigation, as such disclosure could harm the company's competitive position.
Proizvajalec iz primerljive države je zahteval in utemeljil zaupno obravnavo svojih podatkov o prodaji in stroških za namene te preiskave, saj bi tako razkritje lahko škodilo konkurenčnemu položaju družbe.
In addition, the disclosure of the normal value could provide the possibility to a competitor to construct back the prices and costs of the analogue country producer.
Poleg tega bi lahko razkritje normalne vrednosti konkurentom omogočilo, da bi sami ugotovili cene in stroške proizvajalca iz primerljive države.
Therefore, the normal value calculations are accorded with confidential treatment.
Zato so izračuni normalne vrednosti obravnavani zaupno.
Recital 50 of the provisional Regulation used ranges to disclose data regarding profit and selling, general and administrative (‘SGA’) costs of the analogue country producer on a percentage basis.
V uvodni izjavi 50 začasne uredbe so uporabljeni razponi za razkritje podatkov o dobičku ter prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroških proizvajalca iz primerljive države na podlagi odstotnega deleža.
Furthermore, the exporting producers received a specific disclosure with the normal value per product type in ranges.
Poleg tega so proizvajalci izvozniki s posebnim razkritjem prejeli normalne vrednosti za vrste izdelka v razponih.
Finally, for these matters, the interested party was informed that it has the possibility to have recourse to the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings under Article 15 of its terms of reference.
Nazadnje, zainteresirana stran je bila v zvezi s to zadevo obveščena, da se lahko obrne na pooblaščenca za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih v skladu s členom 15 njegovega mandata.
The party did not contact the Hearing Officer on this issue.
Stran se v zvezi s tem vprašanjem ni obrnila na pooblaščenca za zaslišanje.
Following definitive disclosure, the party indicated that it fully understood the confidentiality of the data for establishing normal value and that it appreciated the concerns addressed by the analogue country producer about the unprotected disclosure of their data.
Po dokončnem razkritju je stran navedla, da v celoti razume zaupnost podatkov za določitev normalne vrednosti in da spoštuje pomisleke proizvajalca iz primerljive države glede nezaščitenega razkritja njegovih podatkov.
Therefore, it reiterated its request to have access to the normal value calculation through its legal counsel ‘under protective measures’ or under ‘any other constructive solution’.
Zato je prek svojih pravnih svetovalcev ponovila zahtevo za dostop do izračuna normalne vrednosti z „zaščitnimi ukrepi“ ali s „katero koli drugo konstruktivno rešitvijo“.
The Commission notes there is no provision in the basic Regulation allowing, during the investigation, access to information for which confidential treatment has been requested by its supplier.
Komisija ugotavlja, da nobena določba osnovne uredbe ne omogoča dostopa do informacij, za katere je subjekt, ki jih je predložil, zahteval zaupno obravnavo, med preiskavo.
Following definitive disclosure, the party claimed that the ranges in the specific disclosure with the normal value per product type were meaningless.
Po dokončnem razkritju je stran trdila, da so razponi normalnih vrednosti za vrste izdelka iz posebnega razkritja brez pomena.
The Commission notes that the party failed to make this claim at the time of the provisional disclosure while the ranges in question were exactly the same in the provisional and the definitive disclosures.
Komisija ugotavlja, da stran tega ni trdila ob začasnem razkritju, zadevni razponi pa so bili popolnoma enaki v začasnem in dokončnem razkritju.
In any event, the Commission considers that the ranges used are necessary to preserve the confidential treatment of the relevant data given by the analogue country producer, and give a sufficient understanding of the information submitted in confidence.
Komisija v vsakem primeru meni, da so uporabljeni razponi potrebni za ohranitev zaupne obravnave zadevnih podatkov proizvajalca iz primerljive države in zagotavljajo zadostno razumevanje informacij, ki so bile predložene zaupno.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the determination of the normal value, recitals 40 to 51 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi z določitvijo normalne vrednosti, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 40 do 51 začasne uredbe.
The details for the calculation of the export price are set out in recitals 52 and 53 of the provisional Regulation.
Podrobni podatki za izračun izvozne cene so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 52 in 53 začasne uredbe.
The Shagang group claimed that the Commission did not disclose the legal basis for the deduction of the SGA cost and profit of its related traders in Hong Kong and Singapore.
Skupina Shagang je trdila, da Komisija ni razkrila pravne podlage za odbitek prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov in dobička povezanih trgovcev v Hongkongu in Singapurju.
In addition, the Shagang group claimed that it should be considered a single economic entity together with its related companies and, therefore, it contested the above-mentioned adjustments.
Poleg tega je trdila, da bi jo morali skupaj z njenima povezanima družbama obravnavati kot en gospodarski subjekt, zato je izpodbijala zgoraj navedene prilagoditve.
The party alleged that its related traders located in Hong Kong and Singapore played a marginal function in the entire sales process and simply executed the instructions of another legal entity.
Stran je trdila, da sta imela njena povezana trgovca s sedežem v Hongkongu in Singapurju v celotnem prodajnem postopku postransko funkcijo in sta le izpolnjevala navodila drugega pravnega subjekta.
The Commission clarified that the legal ground for the adjustments in question is Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation as it refers to a mark-up received by a related company which performs functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Komisija je pojasnila, da je pravna podlaga zadevnih prilagoditev člen 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe, saj se nanaša na pribitek, ki ga je prejela povezana družba, katere funkcije so podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizije.