natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In its opinion of 18 May 2017 the Authority concluded that the applicant's request would result in total exposure from food additive uses below the group tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 0,5 mg/kg body weight/day allocated by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) and that the amendment to the specifications as regards the level of the impurities ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol in polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol-graft-co-polymer (E 1209) proposed by the applicant is not of a safety concern.
Agencija je v mnenju z dne 18. maja 2017 sklenila, da bi ugoden zahtevek vložnika vodil v skupno izpostavljenost zaradi uporabe aditiva za živila, ki bi bila nižja od skupinskega dopustnega dnevnega vnosa (TDI) 0,5 mg/kg tt/dan, ki ga je določil Znanstveni odbor za hrano (SCF), in da sprememba specifikacij glede ravni nečistoč etilen glikola in dietilen glikola v polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol-graft-kopolimeru (E 1209), ki jo je predlagal vložnik, ne pomeni tveganja za varnost.
However, the Authority noted that the analytical results provided were consistently and considerably lower (up to 360 mg/kg) than the proposed level of 620 mg/kg for ethylene glycol individually or in combination with diethylene glycol in the EU specifications for E 1209.
Agencija pa je navedla, da so bili predloženi rezultati analiz dosledno in stalno nižji (do največ 360 mg/kg) od predlagane ravni 620 mg/kg za etilen glikol, posamezno ali v kombinaciji z dietilen glikolom, v specifikacijah EU za E 1209.
It followed from the discussions with Member States at the Working Party of Governmental Experts on Food Additives that the maximum limit for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol should be kept as low as can reasonably be achieved as demonstrated by the analytical data to limit their contribution to the TDI.
Na podlagi razprav z državami članicami v delovni skupini vladnih strokovnjakov o aditivih za živila bi bilo treba najvišjo dovoljeno vsebnost za etilen glikol in dietilen glikol ohraniti na tako nizki ravni, kot jo je mogoče razumno doseči v skladu s podatki analiz, da bi omejili njihov prispevek k dopustnemu dnevnemu vnosu.
When updating specifications laid down in Regulation (EU) No 231/2012, it is necessary to take into account the specifications and analytical techniques for food additives as set out in the Codex Alimentarius as drafted by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA).
Pri posodobitvi specifikacij iz Uredbe (EU) št. 231/2012 je treba upoštevati specifikacije in analitske tehnike za aditive za živila iz Codexa Alimentariusa, ki ga je sestavil Skupni strokovni odbor FAO/WHO za aditive za živila (JECFA).
The level for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol set therein is of ‘Not more than 400 mg/kg (singly or in combination)’.
Uredbo (EU) št. 231/2012 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Consequently, it is appropriate to amend the levels of the impurities ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol in the food additive polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol-graft-co-polymer (E 1209) to ‘not more than 400 mg/kg for ethylene glycol individually or in combination with diethylene glycol’.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 4. maja 2018
For the Commission
UL L 354, 31.12.2008, str. 16.
The President
UL L 354, 31.12.2008, str. 1.
OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 16.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 231/2012 z dne 9. marca 2012 o določitvi specifikacij za aditive za živila, navedene v prilogah II in III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 83, 22.3.2012, str. 1).
OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 1.
EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):3303, str. 31, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3303.
EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to food), 2013.
Ocena nekaterih aditivov za živila in kontaminantov: osemdeseto poročilo Skupnega strokovnega odbora FAO/WHO za aditive za živila (JECFA).
EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):3303, 31 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3303
V Prilogi k Uredbi (EU) št. 231/2012 se pri ravni čistosti aditiva za živila E 1209 polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol-graft-kopolimer vnosa za etilen glikol in dietilen glikol nadomestita z naslednjim:
EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to food), 2017.
„Etilen glikoli (mono- in di-)
Scientific Opinion on safety of the proposed amendment of the specifications for the food additive polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol-graft-co-polymer (E 1209).
ne več kot 400 mg/kg (posamezno ali v kombinaciji)“
EFSA Journal 2017;15(6):4865, 23 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4865
Specifikacije JECFA za polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol-graft-kopolimer (INS 1209) so bile pripravljene na 80. zasedanju JECFA in objavljene v monografijah 17 Skupnega strokovnega odbora FAO/WHO za aditive za živila leta 2015.
Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: eightieth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.
V navedenem viru je bila raven za etilen glikol in dietilen glikol določena kot „Ne več kot 400 mg/kg (posamezno ali v kombinaciji)“.
ANNEX
Svet EFSA za aditive za živila in hranilne vire, dodane živilom, 2013.
In the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 231/2012, as regards the purity levels for the food additive E 1209 polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft-co-polymer, the entries for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol are replaced by the following:
Znanstveno mnenje o varnosti polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol-graft-kopolimera kot aditiva za živila.
‘Ethylene glycols (mono- and di-)
Svet EFSA za aditive za živila in hranilne vire, dodane živilom, 2017.
Not more than 400 mg/kg (singly or in combination)’
Znanstveno mnenje o varnosti predlagane spremembe specifikacij za aditiv za živila polivinil alkohol-polietilen glikol-graft-kopolimer (E 1209).
JECFA's specifications for polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft-co-polymer (INS 1209) were prepared at the 80th JECFA's meeting and published in the FAO JECFA Monographs 17 in 2015.
Serija tehničnih poročil WHO 995.
amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) in emulsified sauces
o spremembi Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede uporabe poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) v emulgiranih omakah
According to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) is an already authorised food additive in food category 12.6 ‘Sauces’ (at a maximum level of 4000 mg/kg), but only for dressings.
V skladu s Prilogo II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 je poliglicerol poliricinoleat (E 476) že odobren aditiv za živila v kategoriji živil 12.6 „Omake“ (pri najvišji dovoljeni vsebnosti 4000 mg/kg), vendar samo za prelive.
Pursuant to Article 32(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) needs to be subject to a new risk assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’).
V skladu s členom 32(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1333/2008 mora Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) za poliglicerol poliricinoleat (E 476) pripraviti novo oceno tveganja.
Pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 the re-evaluation of emulsifiers had to be completed by 31 December 2016.
V skladu z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 257/2010 mora biti ponovna ocena emulgatorjev pripravljena do 31. decembra 2016.
On 4 August 2014, an application was submitted for the authorisation of the use of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as an emulsifier in emulsified sauces.
Dne 4. avgusta 2014 je bil vložen zahtevek za odobritev uporabe poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) kot emulgatorja v emulgiranih omakah.
The application was subsequently made available to the Member States by the Commission pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008.
Komisija je pozneje zahtevek dala na voljo državam članicam v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1331/2008.
Fat reduction in processed food, such as emulsified sauces, is normally achieved by the use of thickeners.
Manjša vsebnost maščob v predelanih živilih, kot so emulgirane omake, se običajno doseže z uporabo sredstev za zgoščevanje.
However, thickeners lead to an undesirable modification of the organoleptic properties of the food when used above a certain concentration.
Sredstva za zgoščevanje pa povzročajo nezaželene spremembe organoleptičnih lastnosti živila, če se uporabljajo nad določeno koncentracijo.
An additional reduction of fat content can be achieved in some foods, such as emulsified sauces, by the use of emulsifiers capable of stabilising a high content of water inside fat.
Nadaljnje zmanjšanje vsebnosti maščobe je v nekaterih živilih, npr. emulgiranih omakah, mogoče doseči z uporabo emulgatorjev, ki lahko stabilizirajo visoko vsebnost vode v maščobi.
In studies carried out by the applicant comparing the effectiveness of different emulsifiers for further fat reduction in emulsified sauces, polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) gave the best results both in terms of physical as well as organoleptic properties of the obtained emulsified sauce.
V študijah, ki jih je pripravil vložnik in pri tem primerjal učinkovitost različnih emulgatorjev pri nadaljnjem zmanjšanju vsebnosti maščobe v emulgiranih omakah, so bili pri poliglicerol poliricinoleatu (E 476) doseženi najboljši rezultati, tako v smislu fizičnih kot organoleptičnih lastnosti pridobljene emulgirane omake.
The level of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) needed to achieve the intended technological function was 4000 mg/kg.
Vsebnost poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476), ki je bila potrebna za dosego nameravane tehnološke funkcije, je znašala 4000 mg/kg.
On 27 May 2016, the Commission requested the Authority to evaluate the safety of the proposed extension of use of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) in emulsified sauces in addition to the re-evaluation of the safety of this substance pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010.
Komisija je 27. maja 2016 Agencijo zaprosila, naj poleg ponovne ocene varnosti poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 257/2010 oceni varnost predlagane razširitve uporabe te snovi v emulgiranih omakah.
On 24 March 2017, the Authority delivered a Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) and established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 25 mg polyglycerol polyricinoleate/kg body weight/day.
Agencija je 24. marca 2017 predložila znanstveno mnenje o ponovni oceni poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) in določila sprejemljivi dnevni vnos (ADI) 25 mg poliglicerol poliricinoleata na kg telesne teže na dan.
Considering that the exposure estimates did not exceed the ADI, the Authority concluded that polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive would not be of safety concern if used at the permitted or reported use and use levels.
Ob upoštevanju, da ocene izpostavljenosti niso presegale sprejemljivega dnevnega vnosa, je Agencija ugotovila, da poliglicerol poliricinoleat (E 476) kot aditiv za živila ne pomeni tveganja za varnost, če se uporablja pri dovoljeni ali domnevni uporabi in ravni uporabe.
The Authority also concluded that the additional use of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) at the maximum level of 4000 mg/kg in emulsiﬁed sauces would not result in a total exposure to this substance exceeding the ADI.
Agencija je tudi ugotovila, da dodatna uporaba poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) pri najvišji dovoljeni vsebnosti 4000 mg/kg v emulgiranih omakah ne bi privedla do skupne izpostavljenosti tej snovi, ki presega sprejemljivi dnevni vnos.
Consequently, the extension of use for polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) in emulsified sauces is not of safety concern.
Zato razširitev uporabe poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) v emulgiranih omakah ne pomeni tveganja za varnost.
In addition, the Authority recommended several amendments to the specifications of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012.
Poleg tega je Agencija priporočila več sprememb specifikacij poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) iz Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 231/2012.
These are to a large extent linked to the use of glycerol in the manufacturing process of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) and are therefore similar to the recommendations made by the Authority in its Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of glycerol (E 422).
Te so večinoma povezane z uporabo glicerola pri proizvodnem postopku poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) in so zato podobne priporočilom, ki jih je Agencija navedla v znanstvenem mnenju o ponovni oceni glicerola (E 422).
Consequently, the amendment of the specifications of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476), in line with the recommendations of the Authority, will be addressed separately, together with the specifications of glycerol (E 422) and of other glycerol-based food additives.
Sprememba specifikacij poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) v skladu s priporočili Agencije se bo zato obravnavala posebej, skupaj s specifikacijami glicerola (E 422) in drugih aditivov za živila na osnovi glicerola.
Therefore, it is appropriate to authorise the use of polyglycerol polyricinolate (E 476) as an emulsifier in emulsified sauces, including dressings, in food category 12.6 ‘Sauces’ (at a maximum level of 4000 mg/kg).
Zato je primerno, da se odobri uporaba poliglicerol poliricinoleata (E 476) kot emulgatorja v emulgiranih omakah, vključno s prelivi, v kategoriji živil 12.6 „Omake“ (pri najvišji dovoljeni vsebnosti 4000 mg/kg).
Done at Brussels, 4 May 2018.
V Bruslju, 4. maja 2018
Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 of 25 March 2010 setting up the program for the re-evaluation of approved food additives in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on food additives (OJ L 80, 26.3.2010, p. 19).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 257/2010 z dne 25. marca 2010 o določitvi programa za ponovno oceno odobrenih aditivov za živila v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o aditivih za živila (UL L 80, 26.3.2010, str. 19).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 of 9 March 2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 83, 22.3.2012, p. 1).
PRILOGA
In Part E of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, in food category 12.6 ‘Sauces’, the entry for polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) is replaced by the following:
poliglicerol poliricinoleat
‘E 476
samo emulgirane omake“
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 originating in the People's Republic of China, and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/163
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih novih ali protektiranih pnevmatik iz gume, ki se uporabljajo za avtobuse ali tovornjake, z indeksom obremenitve nad 121, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ter o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/163
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union, and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije, in zlasti člena 7(4) Uredbe.
On 30 June 2017, the coalition against unfair tyres imports (‘the complainant’) lodged a complaint on behalf of producers representing more than 45 % of the total Union production of new and retreaded tyres for buses or lorries.
30. junija 2017 je koalicija proti nepoštenemu uvozu pnevmatik (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) vložila pritožbo v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 45 % celotne proizvodnje novih in protektiranih pnevmatik za avtobuse ali tovornjake v Uniji.
The complaint contained sufficient evidence of dumping and of resulting injury.
Pritožba je vsebovala zadostne dokaze o dampingu in posledični škodi.
On 11 August 2017, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated an anti-dumping investigation with regard to imports into the Union of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 (‘new and retreaded tyres’ or ‘the product concerned’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the country concerned’ or ‘the PRC’) on the basis of Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘the basic Regulation’).
Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 11. avgusta 2017 začela protidampinško preiskavo v zvezi z uvozom v Unijo nekaterih novih ali protektiranih pnevmatik, iz gume, ki se uporabljajo za avtobuse ali tovornjake, z indeksom obremenitve nad 121 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nove in protektirane pnevmatike ali zadevni izdelek) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevna država ali LRK) na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba).
On 21 October, the Commission issued a corrigendum to the Notice of Initiation in which it clarified the scope of the definition of the product concerned.
Komisija je 21. oktobra izdala popravek obvestila o začetku, v katerem je bil pojasnjen obseg opredelitve zadevnega izdelka.
On 14 October 2017, the Commission initiated an anti-subsidy investigation with regard to imports into the Union of new and retreaded tyres for buses and lorries originating in the PRC and started a separate investigation.
Komisija je 14. oktobra 2017 začela protisubvencijsko preiskavo v zvezi z uvozom novih in protektiranih pnevmatik za avtobuse in tovornjake s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo in začela ločeno preiskavo.
It published a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Obvestilo o začetku je objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
On 30 August 2016, the complainant submitted a request for registration of imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC under Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
Pritožnik je 30. avgusta 2016 vložil zahtevek za registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe.
On 4 October 2017, China Rubber Industry Association (‘CRIA’) and the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers and Exporters (‘CCCMC’) submitted comments on the request for registration.
Združenje gumarske industrije Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CRIA) in Gospodarska zbornica uvoznikov in izvoznikov kovin, rud in kemikalij Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CCCMC) sta 4. oktobra 2017 predložila pripombe na zahtevek za registracijo.
They claimed that the request had failed to satisfy the applicable evidentiary standard as there was no evidence of a history of dumping, a substantial rise in imports and that the imports are likely to seriously undermine the remedial effects of the duty.
Trdila sta, da zahtevek ne izpolnjuje veljavnih dokaznih standardov, ker ni bilo dokazov za damping v preteklosti ali znatno povečanje uvoza ter dokazov, da bo uvoz verjetno resno ogrozil popravljalni učinek dajatev.
On 19 October 2017, the Commission held a hearing at the request of CRIA during which it reiterated its earlier comments.
Komisija je 19. oktobra 2017 organizirala zaslišanje na zahtevo CRIA, v katerem je ponovila svoje predhodne pripombe.
On 2 February 2018, the Commission published Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/163 (‘the registration regulation’) making imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC subject to registration as of 3 February 2018 onwards.
Komisija je 2. februarja 2018 objavila Izvedbeno Uredbo (EU) 2018/163 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o registraciji), s katero je za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK od 3. februarja 2018 dalje postala obvezna registracija.
In that Regulation, the Commission assessed the comments made by interested parties.
V navedeni uredbi je Komisija ocenila pripombe zainteresiranih strani.
After the registration entered into force Hankook Group claimed that its rights of defence were violated as no information regarding the Commission's intention to make imports of the product concerned subject to registration had been communicated to it before the entry into force of the registration regulation.
Po začetku veljavnosti registracije je skupina Hankook Group trdila, da so bile njene pravice do obrambe kršene, ker ji informacije v zvezi z namero Komisije glede obvezne registracije uvoza zadevnega izdelka niso bile sporočene pred začetkom veljavnosti uredbe o registraciji.
For that reason the Hankook Group claimed that there was a breach of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Zato je skupina Hankook Group trdila, da je prišlo do kršitve člena 41 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
The Commission observed that prior disclosure is mandatory under Article 20(2) of the basic Regulation before the imposition of definitive measures.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je predhodno razkritje obvezno v skladu s členom 20(2) osnovne uredbe pred uvedbo dokončnih ukrepov.
The same does not apply to a registration decision under Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
To pa ne velja za odločitev o registraciji v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe.
That Article only provides for the prior information to Member States in due time.
Ta člen določa le, da je treba države članice pravočasno predhodno obvestiti.
Moreover, the right to be heard under Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union only applies to individual adverse measures.
Poleg tega se pravica osebe, da se izjasni, iz člena 41(2)(a) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah uporablja le za posamične ukrepe, ki jo prizadenejo.
In this case, the Commission directed the Union customs authorities to register imports.
V tem primeru je Komisija carinskim organom Unije odredila, naj registrirajo uvoz.
The registration regulation is not an individual measure affecting the Hankook Group adversely.
Uredba o registracij ni posamični ukrep, ki bi prizadel skupino Hankook Group.
It was neither addressed to the Hankook Group nor did it produce individual negative effects for that group.
Ni bila niti naslovljena na skupino Hankook Group niti ni imela posamičnih negativnih učinkov za to skupino.
Therefore, neither the rights of defence of the Hankook Group nor Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union were violated.
Iz tega izhaja, da niso bili kršeni niti pravice skupine Hankook Group do obrambe niti člen 41 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 (‘the investigation period’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2016 do 30. junija 2017 („obdobje preiskave“).
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission invited interested parties to contact it to participate in the investigation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj se ji javijo, da bi sodelovale v preiskavi.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the complainant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers, the authorities of the People's Republic of China, known importers, suppliers and users, traders, as well as associations known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je o začetku preiskave posebej obvestila pritožnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike, organe Ljudske republike Kitajske, znane uvoznike, dobavitelje in uporabnike, trgovce in združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter jih povabila k sodelovanju.