natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Fourth, in addition to a detailed list of the coefficients, the Commission provided further explanation on how the coefficients were applied to determine normal values on the basis of a closely resembling product type in the case of product types without a directly corresponding product type in the analogue country.
Sedmič, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 65, je Komisija za vsako izvoženo PCN predložila razpone normalne vrednosti in stopnje dampinga.
The full list of the PCNs in the USA and in the Union and the calculations of the coefficients could not be provided because their disclosure would have required revealing sensitive business information of the producers in the USA and in the Union.
Osmič, Komisija je poudarila, da je morala za vsako izvoženo vrsto izdelka določiti normalno vrednost in sprejeti ugotovitev v zvezi z dampingom.
Fifth, the Commission clarified that the coefficients were established as percentages which reflected the relative differences between the product types, not the absolute price levels in the USA.
„Domneve krivde“ ni bilo, saj je bil damping ugotovljen le, če je bila izvozna cena nižja od normalne vrednosti, negativni dampinški zneski pa so bili v celoti upoštevani pri izračunu skupne stopnje dampinga.
Hence the claim that the absolute price level in the USA had inflated the normal value determination was rejected.
Podaljšanje je bilo odobreno v odziv na nova pojasnila iz uvodnih izjav 64 do 70, ki jih je Komisija predložila kitajskemu proizvajalcu izvozniku.
Sixth, the Commission noted that the highlighted export transaction only represented a small volume (less than 3 % of the exports) and therefore even if this transaction would have been removed, it would not have changed the finding that dumping continued during the review investigation period.
Kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je po dodatnih pojasnilih še vedno nasprotoval določenim vidikom primerjave in določitve dampinga, pri čemer je ponovil nekatere svoje prejšnje trditve.
Seventh, as explained in recital (65), the Commission provided, for each exported PCN, ranges of the normal value and the dumping margin.
Prvič, trdil je, da bi bilo treba cene v primerljivi državi prilagoditi na podlagi ekonomije obsega, ravni trgovanja, nižje produktivnosti, prodajnih stroškov, stopnje donosnosti, dobičkonosnosti in stroškov surovin.
Eight, the Commission pointed out that it was required to establish a normal value and make a dumping determination for each exported product type.
Drugič, trdil je, da mu dana pojasnila še vedno niso omogočala razumevanja, kako so bile normalne vrednosti določene.
There was no ‘presumption of guilt’ because dumping was established only if the export price was lower than the normal value and any negative dumping amounts were fully taken into account when calculating the overall dumping margin.
Tretjič, ponovno je zahteval podatke o stroških za vsako PCN proizvajalcev v ZDA in v Uniji ali vsaj njihov razpon.
Finally, an extension was given to react to the new clarifications outlined in recitals (64) to (70) which were provided to the Chinese exporting producer.
Poleg tega je zahteval informacije o viru vsakega koeficienta in razkritje značilnosti izdelka.
Following the additional clarifications, the Chinese exporting producer continued to contest specific aspects of the comparison, dumping determination and repeated some of its earlier claims.
Četrtič, trdil je, da so bili koeficienti izkrivljeni zaradi prisotnosti jedrskih ali vojaških izdelkov v ZDA in v Uniji.
First, it claimed that adjustments should have been made to the analogue country prices on the basis of economies of scale, level of trade, lower productivity, sales expenses, yield rate, profitability, and the cost of raw material.
Petič, trdil je, da so bili koeficienti, ki jih je uporabila Komisija, napačni.
Second, it claimed that the clarifications provided still did not allow it to understand how the normal values had been determined.
Predložil je alternativne koeficiente, ki naj bi dokazovali, da pri njegovem izvozu v Unijo ni prišlo do dampinga.
Third, it repeated its request to obtain the cost data of each PCN of the producers in the USA and in the Union, at least their ranges.
Alternativno je od Komisije zahteval, naj prilagodi koeficiente na podlagi uporabljene proizvodne metode, povezanih nakupov ali vrste uporabljene surovine.
In addition it requested information on the source of each coefficient, and requested a disclosure of the product characteristics.
Šestič, trdil je, da tudi če se upoštevajo samo neposredno ujemajoče se vrste izdelka, se pri ugotovitvi o dampingu niso upoštevale na splošno nižje cene v Indiji, prilagoditve cen za primerljivo državo, katerih obstoj je zatrjeval, in poseben položaj proizvajalca iz primerljive države.
Fourth, it alleged that the coefficients were distorted by the presence of nuclear or military products in the USA and in the Union.
Komisija je podrobno preučila dodatne trditve.
Fifth, it alleged that the coefficients applied by the Commission were incorrect.
Prvič, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 35, so bile domače cene v Indiji rezultat pravih konkurenčnih razmer in so se zato štele za zanesljive.
It submitted alternative coefficients, the use of which allegedly showed that no dumping occurred in its exports to the Union.
Trditve o izkrivljanju indijskih domačih cen so bile obravnavane že v uvodni izjavi 42.
Alternatively, it requested the Commission to make adjustments to the coefficients on the basis of production method used, related purchases or the type of raw material used.
Kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik novih trditev v zvezi s prilagoditvami indijskih domačih cen ni utemeljil, zato so bile zavrnjene.
Sixth, it argued that even if only the directly corresponding product types were observed, the dumping finding did not take into account the generally lower prices in India, the adjustments for the analogue country prices it had claimed, and the specific situation of the analogue country producer.
Drugič, Komisija je predložila podrobne dodatne informacije o koeficientih, njihovih virih in metodi izračuna, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 64 do 71, kasneje pa je odgovorila tudi na vrsto tehničnih vprašanj v zvezi z metodo izračuna.
The Commission examined the additional claims in detail.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 83, je Komisija navedla tudi primer, kako se je izračunal koeficient na podlagi podatkov o stroških.
First, as explained in recital (35), the domestic prices in India were the result of genuine competition and were therefore considered reliable.
V primeru so bili podatki o dejanskih stroških izraženi v razponih, da bi se zaščitila njihova zaupnost v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
The claims concerning distortions of the Indian domestic prices were already addressed in recital (42).
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik prejel dovolj informacij, s katerimi bi lahko prišel do metode določitve normalnih vrednosti.
The new claims for adjustments to the Indian domestic prices were not substantiated by the Chinese exporting producer and were therefore rejected.
Tretjič, zahteva za dostop do dodatnih podatkov od proizvajalcev v ZDA in v Uniji je bila zavrnjena že iz razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodni izjavi 67.
Second, the Commission provided detailed additional information on the coefficients, their sources and the calculation method, as explained in recitals (64) to (71), and subsequently replied to a series of technical questions regarding the calculation method.
Zagotovitev vira vsakega koeficienta bi razkrila informacije o vrstah izdelka, ki jih proizvajajo posamezni proizvajalci.
As set out in recital (83), the Commission also provided an example of how a coefficient was calculated from the cost data.
Prav tako bi bilo zagotavljanje vseh podatkov v obliki razponov nesorazmerno obremenjujoče, predvsem zaradi velikega obsega podatkov o stroških za posamezne družbe (preko 2000 vrstic in preko 50 stolpcev).
In the example, the actual cost data was expressed in ranges in order to protect its confidentiality according to article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so zahtevani stroški zadevali ravni stroškov vsake PCN.
It was therefore concluded that the Chinese exporting producer had obtained sufficient information allowing it to trace the method of determining the normal values.
Raven stroškov sama po sebi ni vplivala na določitev normalnih vrednosti, saj so se koeficienti uporabili kot deleži (odstotki), in ne kot absolutne vrednosti.
Third, the request for access to the additional data of the producers in the USA and in the Union had already been rejected for the reasons explained in recital (67).
Z drugimi besedami, raven stroškov na PCN ni imela nobenega vpliva na rezultat.
Providing the source of each coefficient would have revealed information about the product types produced by each of the producers.
Nazadnje, stopnja natančnosti, potrebna za izračun koeficientov, se z uporabo razponov ne bi mogla smiselno izraziti.
Providing all the data in the form of ranges would also have been unreasonably burdensome, given the large volume of company-specific cost data (over 2000 rows and over 50 columns).
Razlog za to je, da bi navzkrižno množenje vrednosti, izraženih v razponih, privedlo do tako širokega razpona, da ta ne bi bil uporaben.
Moreover, it was noted that the requested data concerned the cost level of each PCN.
Čeprav se iz teh razlogov osnovni podatki o stroških niso razkrili, pa so se izračunani dejanski koeficienti razkrili v celoti.
The cost level in itself had no impact on the determination of the normal values, because the coefficients were applied as proportions (percentages), not as absolute values.
Nazadnje, indijske domače prodajne cene so bile podane v razponih.
In other words, the level of the costs per PCN had no bearing on the outcome.
Razlog za to je, da so za razliko od podatkov o stroških, ki so se uporabili za določitev koeficientov, indijske cene določile osnovno stopnjo normalnih vrednosti.
Finally, the degree of precision necessary for the calculation of the coefficients could not be meaningfully reflected by using ranges.
Zato je bilo upravičeno, da se kitajskemu proizvajalcu izvozniku zagotovi dostop za preveritev navedenih podatkov.
This is because the cross-multiplication of values expressed in ranges would have given a resulting range too wide to be meaningful.
Četrtič, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 30, so bile v obseg izdelka zajete vojaške in jedrske vrste izdelka, pri čemer ni bilo podlage za ponovno opredelitev obsega izdelka.
While the underlying cost data was not disclosed for these reasons, the resulting actual coefficients were disclosed in full.
Značilnosti izdelka so bile izražene v strukturi PCN, kar je iz razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodnih izjavah 60 in 66, zagotavljalo pošteno primerjavo med vrstami izdelka.
Finally, the Indian domestic sales prices were provided in ranges.
Za dejansko izkrivljanje ni bilo nobene utemeljitve.
This is because differently from the cost data used for determining the coefficients, the Indian prices determined the basis level of the normal values.
Prav tako ni bilo znakov, da bi domnevno izkrivljanje lahko zadostovalo za spremembo splošne ugotovitve, da se je damping nadaljeval v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
It was therefore justified to give access to the Chinese exporting producer to verify that data.
Zato so bile trditve, ki zadevajo jedrske in vojaške vrste izdelka, zavrnjene.
Fourth, as explained in recital (30), the military and nuclear product types were part of the product scope and there was no basis to redefine the product scope.
Petič, glede na pripombe so se koeficienti, uporabljeni za zunanji premer in razred vrste jekla, pregledali in spremenili.
The product characteristics were reflected in the PCN structure, which assured a fair comparison between product types, for the reasons explained in recitals (60) and (66).
Revidirani koeficienti so se razkrili, kot tudi posledične spremembe posameznih stopenj dampinga.
There was no substantiation of any actual distortions.
Medtem ko se je s spremembami znižala stopnja dampinga enega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika, pa te niso zadostovale za spremembo splošne ugotovitve, da se je damping v OPP nadaljeval.
There was also no indication that any alleged distortion could have been sufficient to alter the overall finding that dumping continued in the review investigation period.
Nasprotno pa niso bili sprejeti alternativni koeficienti, ki jih je predložil kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, saj so temeljili na standardnih cenikih proizvajalca Unije iz obdobja izven obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Hence the claims concerning nuclear and military product types were rejected.
Dejanski podatki o posameznih družbah iz obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom so predstavljali bolj zanesljivo osnovo za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Fifth, in the light of the comments, the coefficients used for Outside diameter and Steel grade were reviewed and modified.
Zahteve za prilagoditev koeficientov za proizvodno metodo, vrsto surovine in s tem povezanih nakupov so bile neutemeljene in nejasne, saj nobeden od elementov, ki jih je izpostavil kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, ni vplival na določitev koeficientov, in so bile zato zavrnjene.
The revised coefficients were disclosed, as well as the resulting changes to the individual dumping margins.
Šestič, zahtevane prilagoditve niso bile utemeljene, prav tako ni bilo nobenih znakov, da so bile dovolj pomembne za spremembo ugotovitve o dampingu.
While the modifications lowered the dumping margin of one Chinese exporting producer, they were not sufficient to change the overall finding that dumping continued in the RIP.
Splošna raven cen indijskega izvoza v Unijo ni bila upoštevna, saj je določitev normalne vrednosti temeljila na domačih cenah, in ne na izvoznih cenah, v vsakem primeru pa je bila primerjava po PCN ustreznejša od primerjave povprečnih cen zaradi različnosti vrst izdelkov in bistvenih razlik v cenah med njimi, kar pa se morebiti ne odraža v povprečnih cenah.
By contrast, the alternative coefficients submitted by the Chinese exporting producer were not accepted, because they were based on standard price lists of a Union producer, from a time period outside of the review investigation period.
Zato so bile trditve zavrnjene.
Actual company-specific data, from the review investigation period, constituted a more reliable basis for the normal value determination.
V zelo pozni fazi preiskave je kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik zahteval drugo zaslišanje pri pooblaščencu za zaslišanje, saj je trdil, da so mu bile kršene pravice do obrambe, in menil, da ni prejel zadostne obrazložitve metodologije, ki jo je Komisija uporabila za določitev stopnje dampinga, natančneje, kako so se koeficienti vzpostavili in kako so se uporabili za določitev normalnih vrednosti.
The claims to adjust the coefficients for production method, type of raw material and related purchases were unsubstantiated and unspecific, because none of the elements highlighted by the Chinese exporting producer influenced the determination of the coefficients, and were therefore rejected.
Zahteval je tudi, da se zaslišanja udeležijo tudi druge zainteresirane strani, tj. proizvajalci Unije, proizvajalec iz primerljive države Indije in sodelujoči proizvajalci v ZDA.
Sixth, the claimed adjustments were not substantiated and there was no indication that they were significant enough to reverse the dumping finding.
Vendar nobena od zainteresiranih stran ni sprejela povabila.
The general price level of Indian exports to the Union was not relevant, since the normal value determination was based on domestic prices, not export prices, and in any event the PCN-by-PCN comparison was more accurate than a comparison of average prices because of the wide range of product types and the substantial price differences amongst them, which may not be reflected in average prices.
Po zaslišanju je pooblaščenec za zaslišanje podal nekatera priporočila, v skladu s katerimi naj bi Komisija dodatno pojasnila uporabljeno metodologijo ter dopolnila dodatna razkritja in pojasnila, ki jih je izrazila predhodno v postopku.
As a consequence, the claims were rejected.
Komisija je posledično predstavila dodatno razkritje, omejeno na točke, na katere je opozoril pooblaščenec za zaslišanje in ki so morebiti posegale v pravico do obrambe, ter proizvajalca izvoznika pozvala, naj predloži pripombe na navedene točke.
At a very late stage of the investigation, a Chinese exporting producer requested a second hearing with the Hearing Officer as it claimed its rights of defence were breached as it believed that it had not received sufficient explanation of the methodology followed by the Commission for its dumping determination, more specifically how coefficients were established and applied to establish normal values.
Vsebina tega dodatnega razkritja je navedena v uvodnih izjavah 53, 77, 78 in 80.
It also requested that other interested parties, i.e. the Union producers, the analogue country producer from India and the cooperating US producers, would attend this meeting.
Prilagoditev zaradi pripomb proizvajalca izvoznika je poleg tega povzročila nižjo povprečno stopnjo dampinga kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov: stopnja dampinga se je znižala na razpon od [25 % do 35 %], kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 61, kar je nekoliko manj od [30 % do 40 %], kakor je bil prvotno izračunan v času definitivnega razkritja.
However, none of these interested parties accepted the invitation.
Natančna raven stopnje dampinga ni vplivala na proizvajalce izvoznike, saj pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa ni vplival na raven ukrepov, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 195.
Following the hearing, the Hearing Officer made certain recommendations instructing the Commission to further explain the methodology followed, supplementing the additional disclosures and explanations made earlier in the proceeding.
Komisija je kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom dala na razpolago dovolj časa za pripombe na dodatno razkrite elemente.
As a consequence, the Commission made a supplementary disclosure limited to the points identified by the Hearing Officer as possibly interfering with the rights of defence and invited the exporting producer to comment on those points.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik pa se v svojem mnenju ni omejil na pripravo pripomb o vprašanjih, ki jih je obravnaval pooblaščenec za zaslišanje in za katera je Komisija zagotovila dodatna pojasnila.
The content of this supplementary disclosure is set out in recitals (53), (77), (78) and (80).
Namesto tega je ponovno podvomil o metodologiji, ki jo je uporabila Komisija, pri čemer je ugovarjal njenim pojasnilom, ki jih je že pred tem podala v postopku, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 59 do 83.
The adjustment provided as a consequence of the exporting producer's comments, furthermore, resulted in a lower average dumping margin of the Chinese exporting producers: the dumping margin was reduced to the range of [25 % to 35 %], as set out in recital (61), slightly less than the range of [30 % to 40 %] initially calculated at the stage of the defititive disclosure.
Poleg tega je pozno v petek popoldan, 26. januarja 2018, pred rokom za oddajo pripomb v ponedeljek, 29. januarja 2018, predložil več novih vprašanj in zahtev, ki jih prej, bodisi med postopkom bodisi pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje, ni predložil, pri čemer je trdil, da bo v primeru, da odgovorov ne bo prejel in da ne bo prišlo do razkritja, kršena njegova pravica do obrambe.
The exact level of the dumping margin had no impact on the exporting producers, since the level of the measures was not affected by an expiry review, as shown in recital (195).
V odgovor je Komisija najprej opozorila, da zaradi pravnih in postopkovnih korakov ter rokov za sklenitev preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ne more sprejeti nadaljnjih trditev, zahtev in vprašanj, predloženih v pozni fazi postopka, saj bi to ogrozilo pravočasen zaključek preiskave, zlasti v primeru, kadar so imele strani prej dovolj možnosti in časa za posredovanje pripomb.
The Commission gave the Chinese exporting producers sufficient time to comment on the additional elements disclosed to them.
To še toliko bolj velja v obravnavanem primeru, v katerem je bila zainteresiranim stranem metodologija natančno pojasnjena v okviru več zaslišanj in v več dokumentih o razkritju.
In its submission, however, one Chinese exporting producer did not limit itself to making comments on the points raised by the Hearing Officer for which the Commission provided additional explanations.
Iz teh razlogov je Komisija v svojih pojasnilih po zaslišanju od kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika izrecno zahtevala, da svoje pripombe omeji na posebna vprašanja, v zvezi s katerimi je pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje trdil, da mu je bila kršena pravica do obrambe, in na katera je prejel dodatna pojasnila.
Instead, it once more questioned the methodology followed by the Commission by contesting the explanations already provided earlier in the procedure, as outlined in recitals (59) to (83).
Kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni dokazal, kako so mu bile kršene njegove pravice do obrambe, niti ni utemeljil, kako bi obravnavana vprašanja lahko vplivala na splošne ugotovitve preiskave.
Moreover, late on the Friday afternoon 26 January 2018 before its deadline for comments on Monday 29 January 2018, it put forward a number of new questions and demands, not previously raised either during the procedure or before the Hearing Officer, and claimed that the absence of answer to and disclosure on those questions would infringe its rights of defence.
Poleg izpodbijanja metodologije za določitev normalne vrednosti je kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik še naprej trdil, da je bila njegova stopnja dampinga napihnjena s primerjavo med cevmi za vojaško in jedrsko uporabo ter cevmi za običajno uporabo.
In reply thereto, the Commission first recalled that the legal and procedural steps and the deadlines for concluding a review investigation did not allow it to accept continuing arguments, demands, and questions submitted at a late stage of the procedure as this would jeopardise the timely conclusion of the investigation especially where there had been ample opportunity and time for the parties to comment earlier.
Vendar, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 79, do takšne primerjave ni prišlo in normalna vrednost za te posebne vrste izdelkov ni bila določena.
This was all the more true in the present case where the methodology was explained at length during several hearings and in multiple disclosure documents to interested parties.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik v tej pozni fazi postopka prvič zahteval prilagoditev za pošteno primerjavo cen na podlagi domneve, da je bila njegova produktivnost 2,5 krat večja od produktivnosti indijskega primerljivega proizvajalca.
It is for those reasons that the Commission, explicitly, in its post-hearing clarifications requested the Chinese exporting producer to limit its comments to the specific matters for which it claimed a violation of its rights of defence before the Hearing Officer, and pursuant to which it received further clarifications.
Izpostavil je tudi stopnjo dobička indijskega proizvajalca in zahteval prilagoditev določitve normalne vrednosti navzdol na podlagi tega, da je bila domača prodaja v Indiji v OPP bolj dobičkonosna od ciljnega dobička, ugotovljenega za industrijo Unije v prvotni preiskavi.
The Chinese exporting producer did not demonstrate how its rights of defense were infringed, nor did it substantiate how the points raised could have affected the overall findings of the investigation.
Obe zahtevi sta skupaj predstavljali prilagoditev normalne vrednosti navzdol za 28 %, s čimer bi prišlo do domnevne negativne stopnje dampinga.
In addition to contesting the methodology for normal value determination, the Chinese exporting producer continued to claim that its dumping margin has been inflated by a comparison between pipes for military and nuclear use and pipes for common use.
Prva trditev je bila podana na stopnji, ko je njeno preverjanje postalo neizvedljivo.