natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards the practice of granting free tickets, in the 2014 judgment the General Court held that ‘the casinos charging an admission fee of EUR 6 are placed at an advantage, since they pay less in fees to the State than the casinos charging an admission fee of EUR 15 in respect of the same admission fee received (EUR 0).’.
Ker mora ukrep izpolnjevati vse štiri kumulativne pogoje iz člena 107(1) PDEU, da bi pomenil državno pomoč, ni treba preučiti, ali so v tem primeru izpolnjeni drugi pogoji.
However, it subsequently held that since the system of admission fees to casinos in Greece does not confer an advantage on casinos which charge an entrance fee of EUR 6, the system of free tickets cannot be considered to reinforce the advantage granted by that system.
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV
It then held that ‘[s]ince the casino admission fees system does not confer an advantage within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU as regards admission tickets sold, and since the Member State concerned can permit tickets to be issued free of charge for specific and justified reasons, such as for promotional purposes and for reasons of social obligation, it is reasonable for that Member State to require — as an additional condition — that the fees it would otherwise have been paid are also paid to it in the case of free tickets.’.
Komisija ob upoštevanju navedenega ugotavlja, da sistem dajatev na vstopnine za igralnice v Grčiji, ki je obstajal do novembra 2012, ne pomeni pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU –
Consequently, the General Court excluded the existence of a separate and specific advantage deriving from the practice of granting free tickets.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
In the 2015 order, the Court of Justice upheld that reasoning stating that since ‘the General Court correctly held that the sole difference between the sums paid to the State per admission ticket sold confers no advantage on the casinos for which an entry fee of EUR 6 applies’ the practice of granting free tickets cannot reinforce that advantage.
Člen 1
In light of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the practice of granting free tickets does not confer an advantage for the purposes of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Sistem dajatev na vstopnine za igralnice v Grčiji, ki je obstajal do novembra 2012, ne pomeni pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Finally, the complainant claims that the system of admission fees to casinos in Greece results in the public casinos' higher attractiveness for customers as a result of the lower regulated admission fee and a higher total income (i.e. the generation of other sources of income, such as gambling, accommodation, bar and restaurant services) resulting from the additional customers attracted by the lower admission fee.
Člen 2
Just like for the free tickets, given that the system of admission fees to casinos in Greece does not itself confer an advantage on public casinos, any increased attractiveness or additional revenue from additional customers attracted by the lower admission fee cannot be said to give rise to an advantage.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Helensko republiko.
In any event, even if such an advantage could be shown to exist, only advantages granted directly or indirectly through State resources can constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
V Bruslju, 9. avgusta 2018
According to the Court of Justice, a negative indirect effect on State revenues stemming from regulatory measures does not constitute a transfer of State resources where it is an inherent feature of the measure.
Za Komisijo
For example, national regulation which sets a minimum price for certain goods does not entail the transfer of State resources.
Članica Komisije
Whereas a loss of State resources is involved in the differentiated tax remitted to the Greek State by public and private casinos, no loss of State resources is involved in the mere fact that public casinos were allowed to charge a lower admission fee than private casinos.
UL C 235, 31.8.2010, str. 3.
Consequently, the Commission concludes that the advantage claimed by the complainant, even if it were shown to exist, is not granted from State resources within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Consortium – Loutraki S.A. – Club Hotel Casino Loutraki S.A.
Since a measure needs to fulfil all four cumulative conditions laid down in Article 107(1) TFEU to constitute State aid, there is no need to examine whether the other conditions are fulfilled in the present case.
(Κοινοπραξια Δ.Α.Ε.Τ.- Λουτρακι Α.Ε.- Κλαμπ Οτελ Λουτρακι Α.Ε.), Voukourestiou 11, Akti Poseidonos 48, Loutraki, Atene 10671, Grčija.
CONCLUSION
Casino Mont Parnès, société anonyme „Elliniko Kasino Parnithas A.E.“, Agiou Konstantinou 49, 15124 Marousi Attikis, Grčija .
In the light of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the system of levies on admissions to casinos in Greece that existed until November 2012 does not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU,
Casino Thessaloniki, „Regency Entertainment Psychagogiki kai Touristiki A.E.“, Agiou Konstantinou 49, 15124 Marousi Attikis, Grčija , in 13th km Thessaloniki-Polygyrou Street, 55103 Solun, Grčija.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Sklep Komisije 2011/716/EU z dne 24. maja 2011 o državni pomoči Grčije nekaterim grškim igralnicam (državna pomoč C 16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09)) (UL L 285, 1.11.2011, str. 25).
Article 1
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 11. septembra 2014 v zadevi T-425/11, Helenska republika proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2014:768.
The system of levies on admissions to casinos in Greece that existed until November 2012 does not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sklep Sodišča z dne 22. oktobra 2015 v zadevi C-530/14 P, Evropska komisija proti Helenski republiki, ECLI:EU:C:2015:727.
Article 2
Igralnice so delovale kot klubi, ki jih je upravljal EOT, na podlagi zakona 1624/1951, odloka 4109/1960 in zakona 2160/1993.
This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.
EOT je pozneje na mestu upravljavca igralnic Corfu in Mont Parnès zamenjala družba Elliniki Etaireia Touristikis Anaptyxis (grška družba za razvoj turizma, ETA), ki je bila v celoti v lasti grške države, na podlagi zakonov 2636/1998 in 2837/2000, dokler navedenima igralnicama ni bilo izdano dovoljenje na podlagi zakona 3139/2003 (igralnico na Rodosu pa je do izdaje dovoljenja leta 1996 upravljal EOT).
Done at Brussels, 9 August 2018.
Med sklepi generalnega sekretarja EOT (izdanimi v skladu z zakonom 1624/1951 in odlokom 4109/1960) so: sklep EOT 535633 z dne 21. novembra 1991 (s katerim je bila določena vstopnina za Casino Mont Parnès v višini 2000 GRD); sklep EOT 508049 z dne 24. marca 1992 (s katerim je bila določena vstopnina za igralnici Corfu in Rhodes v višini 1500 GRD) in sklep EOT 532691 z dne 24. novembra 1997 (s katerim je bila vstopnina za igralnico Corfu prilagojena na 2000 GRD).
For the Commission
Zakon 2206/1994 o ustanovitvi, organizaciji, delovanju in nadzoru igralnic ter drugih zadevah, Νόμος 2206, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 62 – 20. april 1994.
Member of the Commission
Ministrski odlok Y.A 1128269/1226/0015/ΠΟΛ.1292 z dne 16. novembra 1995 – ΦΕΚ 982/B'/1995.
OJ C 235, 31.8.2010, p. 3.
Odstavek 1 ministrskega odloka iz leta 1995 se glasi: „Upravljavci igralnic (zakon 2206/1994) morajo od 15. decembra 1995 vsaki osebi izdati vstopnico v skladu s posebnimi določbami iz naslednjih odstavkov.“
Consortium — Loutraki S.A. — Club Hotel Casino Loutraki S.A.
Odstavek 5 ministrskega odloka iz leta 1995 se glasi: „Enotna cena vstopnice za vstop v območje z ‚igralnimi avtomati‘ ali ‚namiznimi igrami‘ znaša pet tisoč ( 5000) GRD.“
(Κοινοπραξια Δ.Α.Ε.Τ.- Λουτρακι Α.Ε.- Κλαμπ Οτελ Λουτρακι Α.Ε.), Voukourestiou 11, Akti Poseidonos 48, Loutraki, Athens 10671, Greece.
Prvi pododstavek odstavka 7 ministrskega odloka iz leta 1995 se glasi: „Od skupne vrednosti vstopnice igralnice zadržijo dvajset odstotkov (20 %) kot pristojbino za izdajo vstopnice in kritje stroškov, vključno z DDV, ki ga morajo plačati; preostali znesek predstavlja javno dajatev.“
Casino Mont Parnès, société anonyme ‘Elliniko Kasino Parnithas A.E.’, Agiou Konstantinou 49, 15124 Marousi Attikis, Greece .
Odstavek 6 ministrskega odloka iz leta 1995 se glasi: „Da bi igralnica zabeležila vstop osebe, ki ji zaradi promocije ali socialnih obveznosti ne zaračuna vstopnine, izda vstopnico z oznako ‚Honoris Causa‘/ ‚brezplačno‘ iz posebne serije ali posebnega totalizatorja v davčno odobreni blagajni. “
Casino Thessaloniki, ‘Regency Entertainment Psychagogiki kai Touristiki A.E.’, Agiou Konstantinou 49, 15124 Marousi Attikis, Greece and 13th km Thessaloniki-Polygyrou Street, 55103 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Drugi pododstavek odstavka 7 ministrskega odloka iz leta 1995 se glasi: „Za izdane vstopnice z oznako ‚Honoris Causa‘/ ‚brezplačno‘ se javna dajatev plača na podlagi cene vstopnic za zadevni dan, kot je določeno v odstavku 5 tega odloka. “
Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011 on State aid to certain Greek casinos C 16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by the Hellenic Republic (OJ L 285, 1.11.2011, p. 25).
Prvi pododstavek odstavka 10 ministrskega odloka iz leta 1995 se glasi: „Javne dajatve se plačajo pri ustreznem davčnem uradu do desetega dne vsakega meseca, pri čemer se predloži obračun dajatev, zbranih v preteklem mesecu.“
Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2014, Hellenic Republic v European Commission, Case T-425/11, ECLI:EU:T:2014:768.
Prvi in drugi pododstavek odstavka 8 ministrskega odloka iz leta 1995 se glasita: „Ob upoštevanju odstavkov od 2 do 7 lahko [upravljavci igralnic] izdajo dolgoročne vstopnice, veljavne 15 ali 30 zaporednih dni ali en koledarski mesec, kakor je primerno.
Order of the Court of 22 October 2015, European Commission v Hellenic Republic, Case C-530/14 P, ECLI:EU:C:2015:727.
Popust na vrednost navedenih dolgoročnih vstopnic se lahko odobri na naslednji način:
The three casinos operated as service clubs of the EOT based on Law 1624/1951, Decree 4109/1960 and Law 2160/1993.
za vstopnice, veljavne 15 dni, štirideset odstotkov (40 %) od skupne vrednosti 15 dnevnih vstopnic.
The EOT was later replaced in the operation of the casinos of Corfu and Mont Parnès by the Hellenic Tourism Development company (ETA), fully owned by the Greek State, under Laws 2636/1998 and 2837/2000, until the grant of licenses to the above mentioned two casinos by virtue of Law 3139/2003 (the Casino in Rhodes was operated by the EOT until it was granted a license in 1996).
Če so take vstopnice izdane za dva koledarska tedna v mesecu, zadnja dva tedna vsakega meseca zajemata obdobje, ki se začne 16. dan in konča konec meseca;
More precisely, the decisions of the General Secretary of EOT (issued in accordance with Law 1624/1951 and Decree 4109/1960) are: EOT decision 535633/21.11.1991 (setting the price of admission tickets to the Mont Parnès Casino at 2000 drachmas); EOT decision 508049/24.3.1992 (setting the price of admission tickets to the Corfu and Rhodes Casinos at 1500 drachmas); EOT decision 532691/24.11.1997 (adjusting the price of admission tickets to the Corfu Casino to 2000 drachmas).
za vstopnice, veljavne 30 dni ali en mesec, petdeset odstotkov (50 %) od skupne vrednosti 30 dnevnih vstopnic.“
Law 2206/1994 on the creation, organisation, operation and control of casinos and other matters, Νόμος 2206, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 62 - 20.4.1994.
Zakon 1624/1951 o ratifikaciji, spremembi in dopolnitvi zakona 1565/1950 o ustanovitvi grškega urada za turizem, Νόμος 1624, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 7 – 8. januar 1951.
Ministerial Decision Y.A 1128269/1226/0015/ΠΟΛ.1292/16.11.1995 – ΦΕΚ 982/B'/1995.
Odlok 4109/1960 o spremembi in dopolnitvi zakonodaje v zvezi z grškim uradom za turizem ter nekaterih drugih predpisov, Νομοθετικό Διάταγμα 4109, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 153 – 29. september 1960.
Paragraph 1 of the Ministerial Decision of 1995: ‘Casino operators (Law 2206/1994) are obliged from 15 December 1995 to issue an admission ticket to each person according to specific provisions included in the following paragraphs.’
Zakon 2160/1993 o turizmu in drugih zadevah, Νόμος 2160, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 118 – 19. julij 1993.
Paragraph 5 of the Ministerial Decision of 1995: ‘The uniform ticket price for entering the areas of “slot machines” or “table games” shall amount to five thousand ( 5000) drachmas.’
Zakon 2687/1953 o naložbah in zaščiti tujega kapitala, Νομοθετικό Διάταγμα 2687, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 317 – 10. november 1953.
The first subparagraph of paragraph 7 of the Ministerial Decision of 1995 states the following: ‘From the total value of the ticket a percentage of twenty percent (20 %) shall be appropriated by the casino undertaking as fees for issuing the ticket and covering its expenses, in which the appropriate VAT is included, while the remaining amount shall be considered public fee.’.
Za Casino Thessaloniki so določbe zakona 2687/1953 začele veljati s predsedniškim odlokom Π.Λ.
Paragraph 6 of the Ministerial Decision of 1995 states the following: ‘To record the admission of a person, from which the Casino refrains from requesting an price of admission for reasons of promotion or social obligation, the Casino shall issue tickets from a special batch or a special counter of the tax records cash register labelled “Honoris Causa”/ “Free admission”. ’.
290/1995 (o odobritvi tuje kapitalske naložbe družbe Hyatt Regency Xenodocheiaki kai Touristiki, Προεδρικό Διάταγμα 290, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 163 – 9. avgust 1995), v katerem je bilo določeno, da se ji zagotovi enaka obravnava kot Casino Mont Parnès in Casino Corfu.
The second subparagraph of paragraph 7 of the Ministerial Decision of 1995 states the following: ‘For tickets issued under the label “Honoris Causa”/ “Free admission” public fees shall be paid based on of the value of the tickets for that day as established in paragraph 5 of the present decision. ’
Glej odstavke 16, 17 in 18 sklepa o začetku postopka.
The first subparagraph of paragraph 10 of the Ministerial Decision of 1995 states the following: ‘The public fees shall be deposited at the competent income tax office by the tenth day of each month by submitting a statement concerning the fees collected during the previous month.’.
Igralnico Casino Mont Parnès je upravljala družba Elliniko Kasino Parnithas A.E.
The first and second subparagraphs of paragraph 8 of the Ministerial Decision of 1995 states the following: ‘As provided under the aforementioned paragraphs 2 to 7, it is allowed [for casino operators] to issue long term tickets valid for fifteen or thirty consecutive days or one calendar month, as appropriate.
(EKP), ki je bila ustanovljena leta 2001 kot podružnica družbe ETA in je bila v celoti pod nadzorom grške države.
A discount can be granted on the value of the above mentioned long term tickets, as follows:
Glede na informacije, ki so jih grški organi zagotovili med formalnim postopkom preiskave, je bila igralnica Casino Corfu po mednarodnem javnem razpisu za oddajo ponudb privatizirana 30. avgusta 2010 s prodajo celotnega osnovnega kapitala družbe Elliniki Kazino Kerkyras AE (EKK) družbi V&T Corfu Ependyseis Casino AE, ki jo je ustanovil izbrani ponudnik, tj. konzorcij Vivere Entertainment Emporiki & Symmetochon AE – Theros International Gaming Inc.
Forty percent (40 %) of the total value of fifteen daily tickets for the tickets valid for 15 days.
Družba EKK je bila ustanovljena leta 2001 kot podružnica družbe ETA.
In case these tickets are issued for a calendar period of two weeks, the last two weeks of each month covers the period from the 16th day until the end of the month.
Na podlagi ministrskega odloka Τ/633 z dne 29. maja 1996.
Fifty percent (50 %) of the total value of thirty daily tickets for the tickets valid for thirty days or a month’.
Zakon 4093/2012, vladni uradni list I 222 z dne 12. novembra 2012.
Law 1624/1951 ratifying, amending and supplementing Law 1565/1950 on the creation of the Hellenic Tourism Organisation, Νόμος 1624, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 7 - 8.1.1951.
Glej odstavke od 19 do 23 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Decree 4109/1960 amending and supplementing legislation regarding the Hellenic Tourism Organisation and certain other provisions, Νομοθετικό Διάταγμα 4109, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 153 - 29.9.1960.
Glej odstavke 26, 27, 28 in 37 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Law 2160/1993 on tourism and other matters, Νόμος 2160, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 118 - 19.7.1993.
Glej odstavke od 24 do 29 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Law 2687/1953 on investment and protection of foreign capital, Νομοθετικό Διάταγμα 2687, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 317 - 10.11.1953.
Glej odstavke 30, 31 in 32 sklepa o začetku postopka.
The Casino Thessaloniki was declared to benefit from the provisions of Law 2687/1953 according to the Presidential Decree Π.Λ.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
290/1995 (approving a foreign capital investment by Hyatt Regency Hotel and Tourism Enterprise, Προεδρικό Διάταγμα 290, Δημοσιεύθηκε στο ΦΕΚ 163 - 9.8.1995) which assimilated it to the casinos of Mont Parnès and Corfu.
Glej odstavka 34 in 35 sklepa o začetku postopka.
See paragraphs 16, 17 and 18 of the Opening Decision.
Glej odstavke 36, 37 in 38 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Casino Mont Parnès was operated by Elliniko Kasino Parnithas A.E.
Glej odstavka 39 in 40 sklepa o začetku postopka.
(EKP), set up in 2001 as a subsidiary of ETA, fully controlled by the Greek state.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. decembra 2016 v združenih zadevah C-20/15 P in C-21/15 P, Komisija proti World Duty Free Group, ECLI:EU:C:2016:981, točka 53 in navedena sodna praksa.
According to information provided by the Greek authorities during the formal investigation procedure, Casino Corfu was privatised on 30 August 2010 through the sale, by international call to tender, of 100 % of the shares in the company Corfu Hellenic Casino S.A.
Glej sodbi v združenih zadevah C-20/15 P in C-21/15 P, Komisija proti World Duty Free Group, ECLI:EU:C:2016:981, točka 56, in zadevi C-6/12, P Oy, ECLI:EU:C:2013:525, točka 18.
(EKK) to V&T Corfu Casino S.A., which was set up by the successful tenderer, namely the grouping Vivere Entertainment Commercial & Holding S.A. - Theros International Gaming INC..
Sodba Sodišča z dne 11. julija 1996 v zadevi C-39/94, SFEI in drugi, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, točka 60; sodba Sodišča z dne 29. aprila 1999 v zadevi C-342/96, Španija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1999:210, točka 41.
EKK had been set up in 2001 as a subsidiary of ETA.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 2. julija 1974 v zadevi C-173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, točka 13.
By virtue of ministerial decision Τ/633/29.5.1996
Sklep Komisije 2004/339/ES z dne 15. oktobra 2003 o ukrepih, ki jih Italija izvaja za RAI SpA (UL L 119, 23.4.2004, str. 1), uvodna izjava 69; mnenje generalnega pravobranilca Fennellyja z dne 26. novembra 1998 v zadevi C-251/97, Francija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1998:572, točka 26.
Law 4093/2012, Government Gazette I 222 of 12 November 2012.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, točka 84.
See paragraphs 19-23 of the Opening Decision
Sodba Sodišča z dne 15. marca 1994 v zadevi C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, ECLI:EU:C:1994:100, točka 13; sodba Sodišča z dne 19. septembra 2000 v zadevi C-156/98, Nemčija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2000:467, točka 25; sodba Sodišča z dne 19. maja 1999 v zadevi C-6/97, Italija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1999:251, točka 15, in sodba Sodišča z dne 3. marca 2005 v zadevi C-172/03, Heiser, ECLI:EU:C:2005:130, točka 36.
See paragraphs 26, 27, 28 and 37 of the Opening Decision.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 20. novembra 2003 v zadevi C-126/01, GEMO SA, ECLI:EU:C:2003:622, točke od 28 do 31.
See paragraphs 24-29 of the Opening Decision.
Točka 55 sodbe iz leta 2014.
See paragraphs 30, 31 and 32 of the Opening Decision.
Prav tam, točka 57.
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1).
Točka 35 sklepa iz leta 2015.
See paragraphs 34 and 35 of the Opening Decision.
Točka 76 sodbe iz leta 2014.
See paragraphs 36, 37 and 38 of the Opening Decision.
Prav tam, točka 77.
See paragraphs 39 and 40 of the Opening Decision.
Prav tam, točka 78.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 December 2016, joined Cases C-20/15 P and C-21/15 P Commission v World Duty Free Group, ECLI:EU:C:2016:981, paragraph 53, and the case-law cited therein.
Prav tam, točka 80.
See Cases C-20/15 P and C-21/15 P Commission v World Duty Free Group, ECLI:EU:C:2016:981, paragraph 56 and Case C-6/12 P Oy, ECLI:EU:C:2013:525, paragraph 18.
Točka 55 sklepa iz leta 2015.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 July 1996, SFEI and Others, C-39/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, paragraph 60; judgment of the Court of Justice of 29 April 1999, Spain v Commission, C-342/96, ECLI:EU:C:1999:210, paragraph 41.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. januarja 1978 v zadevi 82/77, Van Tiggele, ECLI:EU:C:1978:10, točki 25 in 26; sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 12. decembra 1996 v zadevi T-358/94, Air France proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:1996:194, točka 63.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 July 1974, Italy v Commission, 173/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, paragraph 13.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 13. marca 2001 v zadevi C-379/98, PreussenElektra, ECLI:EU:C:2001:160, točka 62.
Commission Decision 2004/339/EC of 15 October 2003 on the measures implemented by Italy for RAI SpA (OJ L 119, 23.4.2004, p. 1), recital 69; opinion of Advocate General Fennelly of 26 November 1998, France v Commission, C-251/97, ECLI:EU:C:1998:572, paragraph 26.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. januarja 1978 v zadevi 82/77, Van Tiggele, ECLI:EU:C:1978:10, točki 25 in 26.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 July 2003, Altmark Trans, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, paragraph 84.
Komisija se je 22. novembra 2014 pritožila zoper sodbo iz leta 2014.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 15 March 1994, Banco Exterior de España, C-387/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:100, paragraph 13; judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 September 2000, Germany v Commission, C-156/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:467, paragraph 25; judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 May 1999, Italy v Commission, C-6/97, ECLI:EU:C:1999:251, paragraph 15; judgment of the Court of Justice of 3 March 2005, Heiser, C-172/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:130, paragraph 36.
Sodišče je s sklepom z dne 22. oktobra 2015 v zadevi C-530/14 P, Komisija proti Grčiji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep iz leta 2015), zavrnilo pritožbo Komisije in potrdilo sodbo iz leta 2014.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 20 November 2003, GEMO SA, C-126/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:622, paragraphs 28 to 31.
Zato je Splošno sodišče predloge za razglasitev ničnosti, ki so jih zoper končni sklep iz leta 2011 vložile družba Etaireia Akiniton Dimosiou AE, Casino Thessaloniki ter Casino Mont Parnès in Athens Resort Casino AE Symmetochon, razglasila za nepredmetne, saj o njih ni bilo treba odločati.
2014 judgment, paragraph 55.
Grčija je zaprosila za prevode v grščino, Komisija pa je v odgovoru 20. decembra 2017 ponovno poslala dokumente v grškem jeziku.
Ibid, paragraph 57.
Grčija je Komisiji odgovorila 26. januarja 2018.
2015 order, paragraph 35.
Zadevni ukrep je sistem dajatev na vstopnine za igralnice v Grčiji, ki je obstajal do novembra 2012.
2014 judgment, paragraph 76.
V okviru tega sistema so bile uvedene različne davčne stopnje za vstopnine za igralnice v Grčiji, ki so bile odvisne od tega, ali je bila igralnica v javni ali zasebni lasti.
Ibid, paragraph 77.
V primeru Casino Rhodes je bilo dovoljenje na podlagi zakona 2206/1994 izdano leta 1996.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1576
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2018/1576
of 18 October 2018
z dne 18. oktobra 2018
(notified under document C(2018) 6961)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2018) 6961)
The Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU was last amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1512, following recent instances of African swine fever in Hungary and Poland.
Priloga k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije (EU) 2018/1512, in sicer po nedavnih primerih afriške prašičje kuge na Madžarskem in Poljskem.