natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this respect, Ryanair's Chief Commercial Officer stated: ‘Ryanair is pleased to launch our first connecting flights service via Rome Fiumicino Airport, allowing customers to book connecting Ryanair flights on the lowest fares in Europe.
Pri formalni preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno (glej uvodne izjave 131–148), da pogoj glede ene rezervacije ni diskriminatoren, saj zagotavlja, da se taksa na letalska potovanja zaračuna le za letalska potovanja, ki se začnejo na irskem letališču in so stranki prodana kot ena celovita storitev, ne glede na število letov, ki jih potovanje vključuje.
Starting with an initial 10 Rome routes, customers will be able to transfer onto their next flight without having to go landside, and have their bags checked through to their final destination.
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da Irski iz opredelitve transfernega potnika ni treba črtati pogoja glede ene rezervacije, da bi zagotovila odsotnost državne pomoči.
This new service under Year 4 of our “Always Getting Better” programme, will be rolled out across the entire Ryanair network, (with further Rome routes to be added in the coming weeks and months) as long as the Rome Fiumicino trial proves to be a success’.
Skleniti je mogoče, da Irska takse na letalska potovanja ni oblikovala očitno nepristransko in samovoljno, da bi dala nekaterim podjetjem prednost pred drugimi.
Customers will also receive one booking reference for both flights.
Prav nasprotno se zdi, da je neuporaba te takse za tranzitne in transferne potnike utemeljena in razumna.
This demonstrates that Ryanair started to provide a new service which it views itself as novel and fundamentally different from the point-to-point flights it has operated so far.
Sklepna ugotovitev glede obstoja pomoči
Second, it can be observed that the ATT leads to separate services being taxed separately, namely, multiple flights purchased under multiple bookings, and single integrated services being taxed only once, namely the component flights of a single journey purchased under a single booking.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedene ocene ukrep, v zvezi s katerim je bil sprožen postopek preiskave, ne izpolnjuje niti enega od pogojev iz člena 107(1) PDEU, saj ni selektiven.
In light of the reasons stated above (see Section 6.2.2.3 of this Decision), this differentiation flows from the fundamental differences between the services purchased by the customer in each situation, which translate into important practical consequences, in particular in terms of check-in, luggage management, and the responsibility of the airline in the event of a missed connection.
Ker so različni pogoji v zvezi s pojmom državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU kumulativni, iz tega sledi, da ukrep ne pomeni državne pomoči.
The fact that some airlines have adopted a business model focussing on point-to-point services whereas others focus on network services does not imply that it would be discriminatory to tax differently what are objectively different services.
Zato ni treba oceniti, ali ukrep izpolnjuje druge pogoje, v skladu s katerimi bi pomenil državno pomoč.
As explained in Section 6.2.2.3 above, it can be considered legitimate to tax air journeys starting in Ireland, as opposed to taxing every single departure of passenger on aircraft out of Ireland.
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV
The Commission notes that the claims made by Ryanair as regards alleged discrimination seem to be implicitly based on the premise that some passengers construct an air journey by buying multiple flights from Ryanair, with a view to travelling from a given airport to another airport ‘via’ other airports, and that such multiple flights should be treated in the same way as a single booking.
Neuporaba takse na letalska potovanja za transferne in tranzitne potnike ni pomenila državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU –
Otherwise, Ryanair would have no reason to consider itself discriminated against vis-à-vis airlines which offer single bookings for multiple flights.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
However, Ryanair has not indicated that it carried any such passengers in the period during which the ATT applied, let alone provided any data as regards the number of such passengers.
Člen 1
More importantly, nothing in Ryanair's submissions is capable of calling into question considerations set out in recitals 132 to 134 which justify treating a multiple flights purchased under a single booking as a fundamentally different service from multiple flights linking the same airports but purchased under separate bookings, the latter being in reality several independent services.
Neuporaba takse na letalska potovanja, ki jo je Republika Irska uvedla z Zakonom o financah (št. 2) iz leta 2008, za transferne in tranzitne potnike ni pomenila pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
As mentioned in recital 38, in its judgment in Case T-512/11, the General Court noted that Ireland was open to considering adjusting the ATT, by removing the requirement for a single booking as part of the definition of a transfer passenger, if necessary.
Člen 2
The formal investigation showed (see recitals 131-148) that the single booking condition was not discriminatory, as it ensured that only air journeys originating from an Irish airport and sold as a single integrated service to the customer, regardless of the number of flights included in the journey, were subject to the ATT.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Irsko.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that it was not needed for Ireland to remove the single booking condition from the definition of a transfer passenger in order to ensure that State aid was not involved.
V Bruslju, 14. julija 2017
It can be concluded that the Ireland has not designed the ATT in a clearly biased and arbitrary manner so as to favour certain undertakings over others.
Za Komisijo
On the contrary, the non-application of the ATT to transit and transfer passengers appears justified and reasonable.
Članica Komisije
Conclusion on the existence of aid
UL C 220, 17.6.2016, str.
In light of the above assessment, the measure under investigation fails to meet at least one of the conditions laid down by Article 107(1) TFEU, as it is not selective.
13.
As the various conditions of the notion of State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU are cumulative, it follows that the measure does not constitute State aid.
Sklep Komisije z dne 13. julija 2011 o državni pomoči SA.29064 (2011/NN) – Oprostitev potniške takse v letalskem prevozu, Irska (UL C 306, 18.10.2011, str.
It is therefore not necessary to assess whether the other conditions for a measure to constitute State aid are fulfilled.
10).
CONCLUSION
Sklep Komisije 2013/199/EU z dne 25. julija 2012 o državni pomoči SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) – Različne stopnje takse, ki se na Irskem uporabljajo za letalska potovanja (UL L 119, 30.4.2013, str.
The non-application of the ATT to transfer and transit passengers did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU,
30).
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 25. novembra 2014 v zadevi Ryanair proti Komisiji, T-512/11, ECLI:EU:T:2014:989.
Article 1
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 5. februarja 2015 v zadevi Aer Lingus Ltd proti Komisiji, T-473/12, ECLI:EU:T:2015:78.
The non-application to transfer and transit passengers of the Air Travel Tax, introduced by the Republic of Ireland through the Finance (No 2) Act 2008, did not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. decembra 2016 v združenih zadevah Komisija proti Aer Lingus Ltd in Ryanair, C-164/15 P in C-165/15 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:990.
Article 2
Kot je bil spremenjen z razdelkom 18 Zakona o financah iz leta 2009 in razdelkom 48 Zakona o financah iz leta 2011.
This Decision is addressed to Ireland.
V skladu z razdelkom 2 Zakona o zračni navigaciji in prometu (sprememba) iz leta 1998 „letališče“ pomeni celotno zemljišče aerodroma in celotno zemljišče v lasti ali uporabi letališkega organa, vključno z letalskimi hangarji, cestami in parkirišči, ki se v celoti ali delno uporablja ali naj bi se v celoti ali delno uporabljalo za namene delovanja aerodroma ali v zvezi s tem.
Done at Brussels, 14 July 2017.
Uredba (ES) št. 1008/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. septembra 2008 o skupnih pravilih za opravljanje zračnih prevozov v Skupnosti (UL L 293, 31.10.2008, str.
Member of the Commission
Komisija je v okviru postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev z dopisom z dne 18. marca 2010 predložila svoje uradno obvestilo, v katerem je zavzela stališče, da Irski zaradi različnih stopenj takse na letalska potovanja ni uspelo izpolniti obveznosti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 in člena 56 PDEU.
OJ C 220, 17.6.2016, p.
Irski organi so po prejemu uradnega obvestila spremenili davčni sistem.
13.
Uredba (ES) št. 261/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. februarja 2004 o določitvi skupnih pravil glede odškodnine in pomoči potnikom v primerih zavrnitve vkrcanja, odpovedi ali velike zamude letov ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 295/91 (UL L 46, 17.2.2004, str.
Commission Decision of 13 July 2011 in State aid case SA.29064 (2011/NN) Exemption from air passenger tax, Ireland (OJ C 306, 18.10.2011, p.
1) določa, da končna destinacija v primeru vmesnih letov za zvezo pomeni destinacijo zadnjega leta, končna destinacija v primeru ločenih letov pa je destinacija, navedena na karti, ki je predložena pri prijavi na let.
10).
Razlaga v uvodnih izjavah 30 do 32, sklepna ugotovitev v uvodni izjavi 37 sklepa iz leta 2011.
Commission Decision 2013/199/EU of 25 July 2012 in State aid case SA.29064 (11/C ex 11/NN) Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland (OJ L 119, 30.4.2013, p.
Sodba vrhovnega sodišča z dne 15. maja 1992 v zadevi Texaco (Ireland) Ltd proti S. Murphyju (Inspector of Taxes), Irish Tax Reports (IV) 1988–1993.
30).
V zvezi s tem se Irska sklicuje na opredelitev pojma „letališče“ iz razdelka 55(1) Zakona o financah in poznejšo spremembo.
Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2014, Ryanair v Commission, T-512/11, ECLI:EU:T:2014:989.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 16, je Sodišče izreklo sodbo 21. decembra 2016.
Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015, Aer Lingus Ltd v Commission, T-473/12, ECLI:EU:T:2015:78.
V odstavku 44 sklepa o začetku postopka je navedeno: „Neuporaba takse na letalska potovanja za transferne in tranzitne potnike odstopa od skupne ureditve, v skladu s katero se obdavči vsak odhod potnika na letalu z irskega letališča.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 December 2016, Commission v Aer Lingus Ltd and Ryanair, Joined Cases C-164/15 P and C-165/15 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:990.
Vendar ostaja vprašanje, ali to odstopanje vključuje razlikovanje med gospodarskimi subjekti, ki so ob upoštevanju cilja, določenega za takso na letalska potovanja, v primerljivem dejanskem in pravnem položaju.
As amended by Section 18 of the Finance Act 2009 and Section 48 of the Finance Act 2011.
Če je cilj takse na letalska potovanja obdavčiti letalska potovanja, ki se začnejo na irskem letališču, je morda ustrezno razlikovati med pravnim in dejanskim položajem letalskih prevoznikov, ki zagotavljajo le storitve od točke do točke, ter letalskih prevoznikov, ki zagotavljajo tudi transferne in tranzitne storitve na zadevnih letališčih“.
Pursuant to Section 2 of the Air Navigation and Transport (Amendment) Act 1998 ‘airport’ means the aggregate of the lands comprised within an aerodrome and all land owned or occupied by an airport authority, including aircraft hangars, roads and car parks, used or intended to be used in whole or in part for the purposes of or in connection with the operation of such aerodrome.
Sklicevanje na primer sodbe Splošnega sodišča z dne 22. januarja 2013 v zadevi Salzgitter proti Komisiji, T-308/00, ECLI:EU:T:2013:30, točka 81, po analogiji s sodbo sodišča z dne 8. novembra 2011 v zadevi Adria-Wien Pipeline in Witersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke, C-143/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598.
Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p.
Družba Ryanair se sklicuje tudi na odstavke 21 in 28–30 sklepa o začetku postopka.
3).
Sklep Komisije z dne 17. marca 2015 o državni pomoči SA.34469 (2014/NN ex 2012/CP) – Različne davčne stopnje za spletne in klasične igre na srečo v Španiji (UL C 136, 24.4.2015, str.
In the context of the infringement procedure, the Commission provided its formal notice by letter dated 18 March 2010, in which it took the position that Ireland by the differentiation in air travel tax rates failed to fulfil its obligations under Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 and Article 56 TFEU.
1), uvodna izjava 56.
Following the letter of formal notice, the Irish authorities amended the tax system.
Ob sklicevanju na odstavek 48 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ L 46, 17.2.2004, p.
Sklep Komisije z dne 31. avgusta 2015 o državni pomoči SA.42424 – Zmanjšanje prispevka k financiranju podpore obnovljivim virom energije za energetsko intenzivne uporabnike, Danska (UL C 369, 6.11.2015, str.
1), provides that in the case of directly connecting flights, a final destination means the destination of the last flight, whereas in the case of separate flights, a final destination is defined as the destination on the ticket presented at the check-in counter.
1), uvodna izjava 32.
Reasoning in recitals 30-32, conclusion in recital 37 of the 2011 Decision.
Ob sklicevanju na odstavek 48 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 15 May 1992, Texaco (Ireland) Ltd v Murphy (Inspector of Taxes), Irish Tax Reports (IV) 1988-1993.
S sklicevanjem na spletišče davčnega in carinskega urada Njenega Veličanstva, Obvestilo o trošarini 550: dajatev za letalske potnike, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/excise-notice-550-air-passenger-duty/excise-notice-550-air-passenger-duty.
In that respect, Ireland refers to the definition of ‘airport’ in Section 55(1) of the Finance Act, and the later amendment.
Predložila je izvlečke iz seznama združenja IATA, ki vključuje takse in pristojbine na karte in letališča, pri čemer je zagotovila podrobne podatke o avstrijskih, nemških in francoskih taksah.
As explained in recital 16, the Court of Justice pronounced judgment on 21 December 2016.
Odstavka 19 in 20 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Paragraph 44 of the Opening Decision reads as follows: ‘The non-application of the ATT in relation to transfer and transit passengers derogates from the common regime under which every departure of a passenger on an aircraft from an airport in Ireland is subject to the tax.
Glej primere iz odstavka 20 sklepa o začetku postopka, ki so predstavljeni v uvodni izjavi 91 zgoraj.
It is open to question, however, whether that derogation involves differentiation between economic operators who are, in the light of the objective assigned to the ATT, in comparable factual and legal situations.
Družba Aer Lingus je predložila primer tega poročila in pojasnila, da se pri predstavljenem izračunu preprosto odšteje navedeno število transfernih/tranzitnih potnikov.
If the objective of the ATT is to tax air journeys starting at an airport in Ireland, it may be appropriate to distinguish the legal and factual situation of airlines providing only point-to-point services from that of airlines that also provide services that involve a transfer or transit at such airports’.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 8. novembra 2001 v zadevi Adria-Wien Pipeline in Wietersdorfer & Zementwerke, C-143/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598.
Reference by way of example to judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2013, Salzgitter v Commission, T-308/00, ECLI:EU:T:2013:30, paragraph 81, by analogy with the judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 November 2011, Adria-Wien Pipeline and Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke, C-143/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598.
Potnik, ki opravi več samostojnih rezervacij različnih letov, ki jih vključuje njegovo potovanje, namesto da bi pri enem ponudniku storitev opravil eno rezervacijo, ki vključuje več letov.
Ryanair also refers to paragraphs 21 and 28-30 of the Opening Decision.
Družba Aer Lingus se je napačno sklicevala na odstavek 45 sklepa o začetku postopka, ki ne vključuje stavka, citiranega v zadevnem odlomku njenih pripomb o sklepu o začetku postopka.
Commission Decision of 17 March 2015 in State aid case SA.34469 (2014/NN ex 2012/CP) Differential tax rates for online and land-based gambling in Spain (OJ C 136, 24.4.2015, p.
Zadnji stavek odstavka 45 sklepa o začetku postopka.
1), recital 56.
Prvi stavek odstavka 45 sklepa o začetku postopka.
With reference to paragraph 48 of the Opening Decision.
Druga polovica stavka odstavka 45 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Commission Decision of 31 August 2015 in State aid case SA.42424 Reduced contribution to financing of RES support for energy-intensive users, Denmark (OJ C 369, 6.11.2015, p.
Zadnji del drugega stavka odstavka 45 sklepa o začetku postopka.
1), recital 32.
Glej na primer sodbo Sodišča z dne 8. septembra 2011 v združenih zadevah Paint Graphos in drugi, C-78/08 do C-80/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:550, točka 49; sodbo Sodišča z dne 8. septembra 2011 v zadevi Komisija proti Nizozemski, C-279/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:551, točka 62; sodbo Sodišča z dne 8. novembra 2001 v zadevi Adria-Wien Pipeline proti Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärenten, C-143/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598, točke 42–54; sodbo Sodišča z dne 29. aprila 2004 v zadevi GIL Insurance proti Commissioners of Customs & Excise, C-308/01, ECLI:EU:C:2004:252, točka 72.
With reference to paragraph 49 of the Opening Decision.
Glej tudi odstavka 127 in 128 Obvestila Komisije o pojmu državne pomoči po členu 107(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o pojmu državne pomoči) (UL C 262, 19.7.2016, str.
With reference to the website of HM Revenue and Customs, Excise Notice 550: Air Passenger Duty, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/excise-notice-550-air-passenger-duty/excise-notice-550-air-passenger-duty
29).
Aer Lingus provided excerpts from the IATA List of Ticket and Airport Taxes and Fees, providing details on the Austrian, German and French taxes.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 15. novembra 2011 v združenih zadevah Komisija in Španija proti Government of Gibraltar in Združenemu kraljestvu, C-106/09 P in C-107/09 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:732.
Paragraphs 19 and 20 of the Opening Decision.
Glej tudi točke 129–131 obvestila o pojmu državne pomoči.
See the examples contained in paragraph 20 of the Opening Decision reproduced in recital 91 above.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 22. decembra 2008 v zadevi British Aggregates proti Komisiji, C-487/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:757, točki 85 in 89 in navedena sodna praksa ter sodba Sodišča z dne 8. septembra 2011 v zadevi Komisija proti Nizozemski, C-279/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:551, točka 51.
Aer Lingus provided an example of such a report and explained that the calculation presented simply deducts a stated number of transfer/transit passengers.
Zato se zdi razlaga, da se taksa na letalska potovanja ne uporablja za tranzitne in transferne potnike, ustreznejša od razlage, da se ti potniki obravnavajo kot „izvzeti“ iz plačila takse.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 November 2001, Adria-Wien Pipeline and Wietersdorfer & Zementwerke, C-143/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598.
To je v skladu s standardno prakso Komisije v protimonopolnih zadevah in zadevah v zvezi z združitvami, kar zadeva opredelitev upoštevnih trgov za redne zračne povezave na podlagi pristopa po načelu kraj odhoda–destinacija.
A passenger who makes several independent bookings for different flights forming his/her journey, as opposed to making a single booking covering several flights with one service provider.
Tako kot Irska tudi Združeno kraljestvo pri opredelitvi potnikov na letih za zvezo uporablja šesturno merilo (vsaj v primerih, ko je prihod prvega leta pred 17.00 uro.).
Aer Lingus erroneously referred to paragraph 45 of the Opening Decision, which however does not contain the sentence quoted in the relevant passage of its comments on the Opening Decision.
Glej http://www.easyjet.com/en/help/at-the-airport/connect-and-transit (kot je bilo navedeno 28. marca 2017).
Paragraph 45 last sentence of the Opening Decision.
Glej https://corporate.ryanair.com/news/news/170517-connecting-flights-launched-at-rome-fiumicino/?market=en (kot je bilo navedeno 1. junija 2017).
Commission Decision (EU) 2018/118
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2018/118
on State aid SA.35818 (2016/C) (ex 2015/NN) (ex 2012/CP) implemented by Spain for Iberpotash
o državni pomoči SA.35818 (2016/C) (ex 2015/NN) (ex 2012/CP), ki jo je Španija izvedla za družbo Iberpotash
(notified under document C(2017) 5877)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2017) 5877)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision(s) cited above and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenima določbama, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By complaint of 30 November 2012, the Commission was informed that Spain had implemented several alleged aid measures for Iberpotash S.A., renamed ICL Iberia Súria & Sallent in 2014 (both hereinafter referred to as ‘Iberpotash’).
Komisija je bila na podlagi pritožbe z dne 30. novembra 2012 obveščena, da je Španija izvedla več domnevnih ukrepov pomoči za družbo Iberpotash S.A., leta 2014 preimenovano v družbo ICL Iberia Súria & Sallent (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Iberpotash).
The complainant, who wishes that its identity be kept confidential (‘the Complainant’), supplemented its complaint by additional submissions of 28 December 2012, 14 February 2014, 24 February 2014, 6 May 2014 and 27 January 2015.
Pritožnik, ki želi ohraniti zaupnost svoje identitete (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik), je pritožbo dopolnil z dodatnimi predložitvami z dne 28. decembra 2012, 14. februarja 2014, 24. februarja 2014, 6. maja 2014 in 27. januarja 2015.
The complaint was forwarded to Spain on 10 January 2013 together with a request for information.
Pritožba je bila 10. januarja 2013 skupaj z zahtevo za informacije posredovana Španiji.
Spain replied on 8 March 2013.
Španija je odgovorila 8. marca 2013.
Additional requests for information were sent to Spain on 14 May 2013, 16 January 2014 and 26 March 2014.
Dodatne zahteve za informacije so bile Španiji poslane 14. maja 2013, 16. januarja 2014 in 26. marca 2014.
By letters dated 13 June 2013, 14 February 2014 and 15 April 2014, respectively, Spain provided the Commission with further information in reply of those requests.
Španija je v odgovor na navedene zahteve Komisiji zagotovila dodatne informacije z dopisi z dne 13. junija 2013, 14. februarja 2014 in 15. aprila 2014.
A preliminary assessment letter was sent to the Complainant on 30 January 2015.
Dopis s predhodno oceno je bil pritožniku poslan 30. januarja 2015.
Reacting to the preliminary assessment letter, the Complainant submitted further information on 5 March 2015 (preliminary reply) and 21 April 2015 (final reply to the preliminary assessment letter).
Ta se je na dopis s predhodno oceno odzval s predložitvijo dodatnih informacij 5. marca 2015 (predhodni odgovor) in 21. aprila 2015 (končni odgovor na dopis s predhodno oceno).
In addition, a meeting was held with the Complainant on 9 March 2015 and additional information was submitted by the Complainant on 4 June 2015.
Poleg tega je 9. marca 2015 potekal sestanek s pritožnikom, ki je dodatne informacije predložil 4. junija 2015.
The final reply of the Complainant to the preliminary assessment letter was sent for comments to Spain on 9 June 2015, together with an additional request for information.
Končni odgovor pritožnika na dopis s predhodno oceno je bil 9. junija 2015 skupaj z dodatno zahtevo za informacije poslan Španiji, da bi v zvezi z njim predložila pripombe.
Spain replied on 8 July 2015.
Španija je odgovorila 8. julija 2015.