natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission underlines that whatever the model of the justice system chosen, the rule of law requires to safeguard the independence of the judiciary, separation of powers and legal certainty.
Kadar pa država članica tak svet ustanovi, kot je to na Poljskem, kjer poljska ustava izrecno daje nacionalnemu sodnemu svetu nalogo, da varuje neodvisnost sodstva, mora biti neodvisnost takega sodnega sveta zagotovljena v skladu z evropskimi standardi.
It is up to the Member States to organise their justice systems, including whether or not to establish a Council for the Judiciary the role of which is to safeguard judicial independence.
Komisija z veliko zaskrbljenostjo opaža, da zaradi zgoraj navedenih novih zakonov pravni režim na Poljskem ne bi več izpolnjeval teh zahtev.
However, where such a Council has been established by a Member State, as it is the case in Poland where the Polish Constitution has entrusted explicitly the National Council for the Judiciary with the task of safeguarding judicial independence, the independence of such Council must be guaranteed in line with European standards.
Poleg tega so ukrepi in javne izjave proti sodnikom in sodiščem na Poljskem s strani poljske vlade in poslancev iz vrst vladajoče večine zmanjšali zaupanje v sodni sistem kot celoto.
It is with great concern that the Commission observes that as a consequence of the new laws referred to above, the legal regime in Poland would no longer comply with these requirements.
Komisija opozarja na načelo lojalnega sodelovanja med državnimi organi, kar je, kot je poudarjeno v mnenjih Beneške komisije, ustavni osnovni pogoj v demokratični pravni državi.
Moreover, actions and public statements against judges and courts in Poland made by the Polish Government and by members of Parliament from the ruling majority have damaged the trust in the justice system as a whole.
Spoštovanje načela pravne države ni le predpogoj za varstvo vseh temeljnih vrednot iz člena 2 PEU.
The Commission underlines the principle of loyal cooperation between state organs which is, as highlighted in the opinions of the Venice Commission, a constitutional precondition in a democratic state governed by the rule of law.
Je tudi predpogoj za ohranjanje vseh pravic in obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Pogodb, ter vzpostavitev vzajemnega zaupanja državljanov, podjetij in nacionalnih organov v pravne sisteme vseh drugih držav članic.
Respect for the rule of law is not only a prerequisite for the protection of all the fundamental values listed in Article 2 TEU.
Poleg tega je ustrezno delovanje pravne države bistveno zlasti za nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga, ker morajo gospodarski subjekti zagotovo vedeti, da bodo pred zakonom enako obravnavani.
It is also a prerequisite for upholding all rights and obligations deriving from the Treaties and for establishing mutual trust of citizens, businesses and national authorities in the legal systems of all other Member States.
Tega ni mogoče zagotoviti brez neodvisnega sodstva v vsaki državi članici.
The proper functioning of the rule of law is also essential in particular for the seamless operation of the Internal Market because economic operators must know that they will be treated equally under the law.
Komisija navaja, da so številni akterji na evropski in mednarodni ravni izrazili globoko zaskrbljenost zaradi novih zakonov o vrhovnem sodišču in nacionalnem sodnem svetu, zlasti Beneška komisija, posebni poročevalec Združenih narodov o neodvisnosti sodnikov in odvetnikov, Urad OVSE za demokratične institucije in človekove pravice ter predstavniki sodstva po vsej Evropi, vključno s Posvetovalnim svetom evropskih sodnikov, Evropsko mrežo sodnih svetov in Svetom odvetniških združenj Evrope.
This cannot be assured without an independent judiciary in each Member State.
V resoluciji z dne 15. novembra 2017 o razmerah na področju pravne države in demokracije na Poljskem je Evropski parlament izrazil globoko zaskrbljenost nad preoblikovano zakonodajo v zvezi s poljskim sodstvom ter poljskega predsednika pozval, naj novih zakonov ne podpiše, dokler ne bodo v celoti zagotavljali neodvisnosti sodstva.
The Commission notes that a wide range of actors at European and international level have expressed their deep concern about the two new laws on the Supreme Court and the National Council for the Judiciary, in particular the Venice Commission, the United Nations Special Rapporteur for the Independence of Judges and Lawyer, the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights and the representatives of the judiciary across Europe, including the Consultative Council of European Judges, European Network of Councils for the Judiciary and the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe.
PRIPOROČENI UKREPI
In its resolution of 15 November 2017 on the situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland, the European Parliament stated that it is deeply concerned at the redrafted legislation relating to the Polish judiciary and called on the Polish President not to sign new laws unless they fully guarantee the independence of the judiciary.
Komisija priporoča, naj poljski organi nemudoma sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za odpravo sistemske nevarnosti za načelo pravne države iz oddelka 2.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Komisija zlasti priporoča, naj poljski organi sprejmejo naslednje ukrepe v zvezi z novo sprejetimi zakoni, da se zagotovi njihova skladnost z zahtevami o varovanju neodvisnosti sodstva, delitve oblasti in pravne varnosti ter s poljsko ustavo in evropskimi standardi o neodvisnosti sodstva:
The Commission recommends that the Polish authorities take appropriate action to address the systemic threat to the rule of law identified in section 2 as a matter of urgency.
zagotovitev, da se zakon o vrhovnem sodišču spremeni tako, da:
In particular, the Commission recommends that the Polish authorities take the following actions with regard to the newly adopted laws in order to ensure their compliance with the requirements of safeguarding the independence of the judiciary, of separation of powers and of legal certainty as well as with the Polish Constitution and European standards on judicial independence:
se znižana upokojitvena starost za sedanje sodnike vrhovnega sodišča ne uporabi,
ensure that the law on the Supreme Court is amended so as to:
se odvzame diskrecijsko pooblastilo predsednika republike, da podaljša tekoči mandat sodnikov vrhovnega sodišča,
not apply a lowered retirement age to the current Supreme Court judges;
se odstrani novi postopek z izrednim pravnim sredstvom;
remove the discretionary power of the President of the Republic to prolong the active judicial mandate of the Supreme Court judges;
zagotovitev, da se zakon o nacionalnem sodnem svetu spremeni tako, da mandat sodnikov članov nacionalnega sodnega sveta ne preneha in da se nova ureditev za imenovanje odstrani, da se zagotovi izvolitev sodnikov članov s strani njihovih kolegov;
remove the extraordinary appeal procedure;
opustitev ukrepov in javnih izjav, ki bi lahko nadalje ogrozili zakonitost vrhovnega sodišča, splošnih sodišč, sodnikov, individualno ali kolektivno, ali sodstva kot celote.
ensure that the law on the National Council for the Judiciary is amended so that the mandate of judges-members of the National Council for the Judiciary is not terminated and the new appointment regime is removed in order to ensure election of judges-members by their peers;
Poleg tega Komisija opozarja, da nobeden od naslednjih ukrepov, priporočenih v priporočilu z dne 26. julija 2017 glede ustavnega sodišča, zakona o organizaciji splošnih sodišč in zakona o nacionalni šoli za sodnike, ni bil sprejet, ter zato znova poudarja svoje priporočilo, da se sprejmejo naslednji ukrepi:
refrain from actions and public statements which could undermine further the legitimacy of the Supreme Court, the ordinary courts, the judges, individually or collectively, or the judiciary as a whole.
ponovna vzpostavitev neodvisnosti in zakonitosti ustavnega sodišča kot varuha poljske ustave, tako da se zagotovi, da so sodniki, predsednik in podpredsednik ustavnega sodišča zakonito izvoljeni in imenovani, ter da se v celoti izvršita sodbi ustavnega sodišča z dne 3. in 9. decembra 2015, ki zahtevata, da trije sodniki, ki jih je oktobra 2015 zakonito imenovala prejšnja sestava zakonodajalca, nastopijo svojo funkcijo ustavnih sodnikov in da trije sodniki, ki jih je imenovala nova sestava zakonodajalca brez veljavne pravne podlage, o zadevah ne odločajo več, ne da bi bili zakonito izvoljeni;
In addition, the Commission recalls that none of the following actions, recommended in its Recommendation of 26 July 2017, relating to the Constitutional Tribunal, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation and the law on the National School of Judiciary have been taken and therefore reiterates its recommendation to take the following actions:
objava in celotna izvršitev sodb ustavnega sodišča z dne 9. marca 2016, 11. avgusta 2016 in 7. novembra 2016;
restore the independence and legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal as guarantor of the Polish Constitution by ensuring that its judges, its President and its Vice-President are lawfully elected and appointed and by implementing fully the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 3 and 9 December 2015 which require that the three judges that were lawfully nominated in October 2015 by the previous legislature can take up their function of judge in the Constitutional Tribunal, and that the three judges nominated by the new legislature without a valid legal basis no longer adjudicate without being validly elected;
zagotovitev, da se zakon o organizaciji splošnih sodišč in zakon o nacionalni šoli za sodnike umakneta ali spremenita, da se zagotovi skladnost z ustavo in evropskimi standardi o neodvisnosti sodstva.
publish and implement fully the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 9 March 2016, 11 August 2016 and 7 November 2016;
Natančneje Komisija zlasti priporoča, da:
ensure that the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation and on the National School of Judiciary is withdrawn or amended in order to ensure its compliance with the Constitution and European standards on judicial independence; concretely, the Commission recommends in particular to:
se umakne nova upokojitvena ureditev za sodnike splošnih sodišč, skupaj z diskrecijskim pooblastilom ministra za pravosodje, da podaljša njihove mandate,
remove the new retirement regime for judges of ordinary courts, including the discretionary power of the Minister of Justice to prolong their mandate;
se odvzame diskrecijsko pooblastilo ministra za pravosodje, da imenuje in razreši predsednike sodišč, in se odpravijo ukrepi, ki so bili že sprejeti;
remove the discretionary power of the Minister of Justice to appoint and dismiss presidents of courts and remedy decisions already taken;
zagotovitev, da je kakršna koli sodna reforma v podporo pravni državi in skladna s pravom EU in evropskimi standardi o neodvisnosti sodstva ter da je pripravljena v tesnem sodelovanju s sodstvom in vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi.
ensure that any justice reform upholds the rule of law and complies with EU law and the European standards on judicial independence and is prepared in close cooperation with the judiciary and all interested parties.
Komisija poudarja, da je lojalno sodelovanje, ki je potrebno med različnimi državnimi institucijami v zadevah, povezanih z načelom pravne države, bistvenega pomena za iskanje rešitve v trenutnih razmerah.
The Commission underlines that the loyal cooperation which is required amongst the different state institutions in rule of law related matters is essential in order to find a solution in the present situation.
Prav tako spodbuja poljske organe, naj izvršijo mnenja Beneške komisije o zakonu o nacionalnem sodnem svetu, zakonu o organizaciji splošnih sodišč in zakonu o vrhovnem sodišču ter pridobijo njena mnenja o vseh morebitnih novih zakonodajnih predlogih, namenjenih reformi sodnega sistema na Poljskem.
The Commission also encourages the Polish authorities to implement the opinions of the Venice Commission on the law on the National Council for the Judiciary, the law on the Ordinary Courts Organisation and the law on the Supreme Court as well as to seek the views of the Venice Commission on any new legislative proposal aiming to reform the justice system in Poland.
Komisija poljsko vlado poziva, naj odpravi težave iz tega priporočila v treh mesecih po prejemu tega priporočila in jo obvesti o ukrepih, sprejetih v ta namen.
The Commission invites the Polish Government to solve the problems identified in this Recommendation within three months of receipt of this Recommendation, and to inform the Commission of the steps taken to that effect.
To priporočilo se objavi hkrati z obrazloženim predlogom Komisije v skladu s členom 7(1) PEU v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem.
The present Recommendation is issued at the same time as the reasoned proposal presented by the Commission in accordance with Article 7(1) TEU regarding the rule of law in Poland.
Komisija je pripravljena, v tesnem posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom, ponovno preučiti navedeni obrazloženi predlog, če bi poljski organi izvedli priporočene ukrepe iz tega priporočila v roku, določenem v njem.
The Commission is ready, in close consultation with the European Parliament and the Council, to reconsider that reasoned proposal, should the Polish authorities implement the recommended actions set out in the present Recommendation within the time prescribed.
Na podlagi tega priporočila je Komisija še vedno pripravljena nadaljevati konstruktiven dialog s poljsko vlado.
On the basis of this Recommendation, the Commission is ready to pursue a constructive dialogue with the Polish Government.
V Bruslju, 20. decembra 2017
For the Commission
Prvi podpredsednik
First Vice-President
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2016/1374 z dne 27. julija 2016 v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem (UL L 217, 12.8.2016, str.
53).
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2017/146 z dne 21. decembra 2016 v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem o dopolnitvi Priporočila (EU) 2017/146 (UL L 22, 27.1.2017, str.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/146 of 21 December 2016 regarding the rule of law in Poland complementary to Recommendation (EU) 2017/146 (OJ L 22, 27.1.2017, p.
65) in Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2017/1520 z dne 26. julija 2017 v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem o dopolnitvi priporočil (EU) 2016/1374 in (EU) 2017/146 (UL L 228, 2.9.2017, str.
65); and Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/1520 of 26 July 2017 regarding the rule of law in Poland complementary to Recommendation (EU) 2016/1374 and (EU) 2017/146 (OJ L 228, 2.9.2017, p.
19).
19).
Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 11. marca 2014: Novi okvir EU za krepitev načela pravne države, COM(2014) 158 final.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 11 March 2014, ‘A new EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law’, COM(2014) 158 final.
Glej COM(2014) 158 final, oddelek 2, Priloga I.
See COM(2014) 158 final, section 2, Annex I.
Urad OVSE za demokratične institucije in človekove pravice (ODIHR OVSE), 30. avgusta 2017, Mnenje o nekaterih določbah osnutka zakona o poljskem vrhovnem sodišču.
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), 30 August 2017, Opinion on Certain Provisions of the Draft Act on the Supreme Court of Poland.
PACE, 11. oktobra 2017, Resolucija 2188 (2017), Nove grožnje za pravno državo v državah članicah Sveta Evrope: izbrani primeri.
PACE, 11 October 2017, Resolution 2188 (2017), New threats to the rule of law in Council of Europe member States: selected examples.
ENCJ, 13. oktobra 2017, Mnenje izvršnega odbora ENCJ na zahtevo Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (poljski nacionalni sodni svet).
ENCJ, 13 October 2017, Opinion of the ENCJ Executive Board on the request of the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council for the Judiciary) of Poland.
Posebni poročevalec Združenih narodov o neodvisnosti sodnikov in odvetnikov, 27. oktobra 2017, Predhodne ugotovitve na podlagi uradnega obiska na Poljskem (23.–27. oktobra 2017).
United Nations Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, 27 October 2017, Preliminary observations on the official visit to Poland (23-27 October 2017).
CCJE(2017) 9, 10. novembra 2017, Izjava v zvezi s stanjem neodvisnosti sodstva na Poljskem.
CCJE(2017)9, 10 November 2017, Statement as regards the Situation on the Independence of the Judiciary in Poland.
ODIHR OVSE, 13. novembra 2017, Mnenje o nekaterih določbah osnutka zakona o poljskem vrhovnem sodišču (z dne 26. septembra 2017).
OSCE-ODIHR, 13 November 2017, Opinion on Certain Provisions of the Draft Act on the Supreme Court of Poland (as of 26 September 2017).
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. novembra 2017 o spoštovanju načela pravne države in demokracije na Poljskem (2017/2931(RSP)).
European Parliament resolution of 15 November 2017 on the situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland (2017/2931(RSP).
CCBE, 24. novembra 2017, Resolucija plenarnega zasedanja Sveta odvetniških združenj Evrope (CCBE).
CCBE, 24 November 2017, Resolution of the Plenary Session of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).
ENCJ, 5. decembra 2017, Mnenje izvršnega odbora ENCJ o sprejetju sprememb zakona o nacionalnem sodnem svetu.
ENCJ, 5 December 2017, Opinion of the ENCJ Executive Board on the adoption of the amendments to the law on the National Council for the Judiciary.
Mnenje 904/2017 CDL(2017)035 Beneške komisije o osnutku zakona o spremembi zakona o nacionalnem sodnem svetu, osnutku zakona o spremembi zakona o vrhovnem sodišču, ki ga je predlagal predsednik Poljske, ter zakonu o organizaciji splošnih sodišč („CDL(2017)035“) in Mnenje 892/2017 CDL(2017)037 Beneške komisije o zakonu o javnem tožilstvu, kakor je bil spremenjen ( „CDL(2017)037“).
Opinion 904/2017 CDL(2017)035 of the Venice Commission on the draft act amending the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary, on the draft act amending the Act on the Supreme Court proposed by the President of Poland, and on the Act on the Organisation of Ordinary Courts (‘CDL(2017)035’), and Opinion 892/2017 CDL(2017)037 of the Venice Commission on the Act on the Public Prosecutor's Office as amended ( ‘CDL(2017)037’).
Zakon o spremembi zakona o nacionalni šoli za sodnike in državne tožilce, zakona o organizaciji splošnih sodišč in nekaterih drugih zakonov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon o nacionalni šoli za sodnike).
The law amending the law on the National School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation and certain other laws (‘law on the National School of Judiciary’).
Člen 37(1) zakona o vrhovnem sodišču.
Article 37(1) of the law on the Supreme Court.
Ta določba se uporablja tudi za sodnike vrhovnega upravnega sodišča, saj člen 49 zakona z dne 25. julija 2002 o organizaciji upravnega sodišča določa, da zadeve v zvezi z vrhovnim upravnim sodiščem, ki jih ne ureja ta zakon (upokojitvene ureditve ne ureja), smiselno ureja zakon o vrhovnem sodišču.
This provision also applies to Supreme Administrative Court judges since Article 49 of the law of 25 July 2002 on administrative court organisation stipulates that matters related to the Supreme Administrative Court that are not governed by that act (the retirement regime is not) are governed mutatis mutandis by the law on the Supreme Court.
Člen 111(1) zakona o vrhovnem sodišču.
Article 111(1) of the law on the Supreme Court.
Poleg tega bodo v skladu s členom 111(3) zakona o vrhovnem sodišču vsi sodniki vojaškega senata (ne glede na starost) razrešeni in prisilno upokojeni brez možnosti, da predsednika republike prosijo za podaljšanje svojega tekočega mandata.
In addition, according to Article 111(3) of the law on the Supreme Court, all judges of the military chamber (regardless of their age) will be dismissed and retired without the possibility to ask the President of the Republic for prolongation of their active mandate.
Zadeva ESČP Campbell in Fell proti Združenemu kraljestvu, 28. junij 1984, točka 80; zadeva Henryk Urban in Ryszard Urban proti Poljski, 30. november 2011 (final), točka 45; zadeva Fruni proti Slovaški, 21. junij 2011 (final), točka 145, in zadeva Brudnicka in drugi proti Poljski, 3. marec 2005 (final), točka 41.
ECtHR Case Campbell and Fell v The United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, para 80; Case Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v Poland, 30 November 2011 (final), para 45; Case Fruni v Slovakia, 21 June 2011 (final) para 145; and Case Brudnicka and others v Poland, 3 March 2005 (final) para 41.
Odstavka 49 in 50 Priporočila CM/Rec(2010)12 Odbora ministrov državam članicam o neodvisnosti, učinkovitosti in odgovornosti sodnikov („Priporočilo Sveta Evrope iz leta 2010“).
Para 49 and 50 of the Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities (‘2010 CoE Recommendation’).
CDL(2017)035, odst.
CDL(2017)035 para 48.
48.
Judgement of 31 May 2005 in Case C-53/03 Syfait and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2005:333, para 31; Judgement of 4 February 1999 in Case C-103/97 Köllensperger and Atzwanger, ECLI:EU:C:1999:52, para 20.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 31. maja 2005, Syfait in drugi, C-53/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:333, točka 31; sodba Sodišča z dne 4. februarja 1999, Köllensperger in Atzwanger, C-103/97, ECLI:EU:C:1999:52, točka 20.
Judgement of 9 October 2014 in Case C-222/13 TDC, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2265, para 29-32; Judgement of 19 September 2006 in Case C-506/04 Wilson, ECLI:EU:C:2006:587, para 53; Judgement of 4 February 1999 in Case C-103/97 Köllensperger and Atzwanger, ECLI:EU:C:1999:52, para 20-23; Judgement of 17 September 1997 in Case C-54/96 Dorsch Consult, ECLI:EU:C:1997:413, para 36; Judgement of 29 November 2001 in Case C-17/00, De Coster, ECLI:EU:C:2001:651, para 18-21; Judgement of 13 December 2017 in Case C-403/16, Hassani, ECLI:EU:C:2017:960, para 40; ECtHR Case Baka v. Hungary, 20261/12, 23 June 2016, para 121.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 9. oktobra 2014, TDC, C-222/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2265, točke 29 do32; sodba Sodišča v z dne 19. septembra 2006, Wilson, C-506/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:587, točka 53; sodba Sodišča z dne 4. februarja 1999, Köllensperger in Atzwanger, C-103/97, ECLI:EU:C:1999:52, točke 20 do 23; sodba Sodišča z dne17. septembra 1997, Dorsch Consult, C-54/96, ECLI:EU:C:1997:413, točka 36; sodba Sodišča z dne 29. novembra 2001, De Coster, C-17/00, ECLI:EU:C:2001:651, točke 18 do 21; sodba Sodišča z dne 13. decembra 2017, Hassani, C-403/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:960, točka 40; zadeva ESČP Baka proti Madžarski, 20261/12, 23. junij 2016, točka 121.
ECtHR Case Campbell and Fell v The United Kingdom, A80 (1984), 28 June 1984, para 80.
Zadeva ESČP Campbell in Fell proti Združenemu kraljestvu, A80 (1984), 28. junij 1984, točka 80.
The new rules contradict the principle of irremovability of judges as a key element of the independence of judges as enshrined in the 2010 CoE Recommendation (para 49).
Nova pravila so v nasprotju z načelom nezamenljivosti sodnikov kot ključnim elementom neodvisnosti sodnikov iz Priporočila Sveta Evrope iz leta 2010 (odst.
Accordingly, Supreme Court judges should have guaranteed tenure, and their mandates should not be prematurely terminated.
49).
Also decisions concerning the selection and career of judges should be based on objective criteria pre-established by law or by the competent authorities, and where the government or the legislative power take decisions concerning the selection and career of judges, an independent and competent authority drawn in substantial part from the judiciary should be authorised to make recommendations or express opinions which the relevant appointing authority follows in practice (para 44-48).
Skladno s tem bi morali imeti sodniki vrhovnega sodišča zajamčeno pravico do službenega položaja, njihov mandat pa ne bi smel predčasno prenehati.