natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Any extension of a deadline for processing personal data in cases where prosecution is time-barred in all Member States concerned should be decided only where there is a specific need to provide assistance under this Regulation.
Kadar pregon kaznivega dejanja zastara v vseh zadevnih državah članicah, bi se bilo treba za vsako podaljšanje rokov za obdelavo osebnih podatkov odločiti le, če obstaja posebna potreba po zagotavljanju pomoči v skladu s to uredbo.
Eurojust should maintain privileged relations with the European Judicial Network based on consultation and complementarity.
Eurojust bi moral še naprej ohranjati privilegiran odnos z Evropsko pravosodno mrežo, ki temelji na posvetovanju in dopolnjevanju.
This Regulation should help clarify the respective roles of Eurojust and the European Judicial Network and their mutual relations, while maintaining the specificity of the European Judicial Network.
Ta uredba bi morala prispevati k pojasnitvi vloge Eurojusta in Evropske pravosodne mreže ter njunega medsebojnega odnosa in pri tem upoštevati posebnosti Evropske pravosodne mreže.
Eurojust should maintain cooperative relations with other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, with the EPPO, with the competent authorities of third countries and with international organisations, to the extent required for the fulfilment of its tasks.
Eurojust bi moral ohranjati sodelovanje z drugimi institucijami, organi, uradi in agencijami Unije, EJT, pristojnimi organi tretjih držav ter mednarodnimi organizacijami, kolikor je to potrebno za opravljanje njegovih nalog.
To enhance operational cooperation between Eurojust and Europol, and particularly to establish links between data already in the possession of either agency, Eurojust should enable Europol to have access, on the basis of a hit/no-hit system, to data held by Eurojust.
Za izboljšanje operativnega sodelovanja med Eurojustom in Europolom ter zlasti za vzpostavitev povezav med podatki, ki jih že ima eden od njiju, bi moral Eurojust Europolu omogočiti dostop do svojih podatkov na podlagi sistema zadetek/ni zadetka.
Eurojust and Europol should ensure that the necessary arrangements are established to optimise their operational cooperation, taking due account of their respective mandates and any restrictions provided by the Member States.
Eurojust in Europol bi morala zagotoviti, da so sklenjeni dogovori, potrebni za optimiziranje njunega operativnega sodelovanja, ob ustreznem upoštevanju njunih mandatov ter morebitnih omejitev s strani držav članic.
These working arrangements should ensure access to, and the possibility of searching, all information that has been provided to Europol for the purpose of cross-checking in accordance with the specific safeguards and data protection guarantees provided for in this Regulation.
Ti delovni dogovori bi jima morali zagotavljati dostop do vseh informacij, ki so bile Europolu posredovane za namen navzkrižnega preverjanja, in možnost vzajemnega iskanja po teh informacijah, in sicer v skladu s posebnimi zaščitnimi ukrepi in jamstvi za varstvo podatkov iz te uredbe.
Any access by Europol to data held by Eurojust should be limited by technical means to information falling within the respective mandates of those Union agencies.
Vsakršen dostop Europola do podatkov, ki jih ima Eurojust, bi bilo treba tehnično omejiti na informacije, povezane z mandatoma teh agencij Unije.
Eurojust and Europol should keep each other informed of any activity involving the financing of joint investigation teams.
Eurojust in Europol bi morala obveščati drug drugega o vseh dejavnostih, ki vključuje financiranje skupnih preiskovalnih enot.
Eurojust should be able to exchange personal data with Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies to the extent necessary for the fulfilment of its tasks, with full respect for the protection of privacy and other fundamental rights and freedoms.
Eurojustu bi bilo treba omogočiti izmenjavo osebnih podatkov z institucijami, organi, uradi in agencijami Unije v obsegu, ki je potreben za izpolnjevanje njegovih nalog, ob popolnem spoštovanju varstva zasebnosti ter drugih temeljnih pravic in svoboščin.
Eurojust should enhance its cooperation with competent authorities of third countries and international organisations on the basis of a strategy drawn up in consultation with the Commission.
Eurojust bi moral okrepiti svoje sodelovanje s pristojnimi organi tretjih držav in mednarodnimi organizacijami na podlagi strategije, vzpostavljene ob posvetovanju s Komisijo.
For that purpose, provision should be made for Eurojust to post liaison magistrates to third countries in order to achieve objectives similar to those assigned to liaison magistrates seconded by the Member States on the basis of Council Joint Action 96/277/JHA.
Zato bi bilo treba sprejeti določbe, na podlagi katerih bi Eurojust v tretje države napotil pravosodne funkcionarje za zvezo, da bi se izpolnili cilji, podobni ciljem pravosodnih funkcionarjev za zvezo, ki jih države članice začasno dodelijo na podlagi Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 96/277/PNZ.
Provision should be made for Eurojust to coordinate the execution of requests for judicial cooperation issued by a third country, where those requests require execution in at least two Member States as part of the same investigation.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da lahko Eurojust usklajuje izvrševanje zaprosil za pravosodno sodelovanje, ki jih je izdala tretja država, če te zahteve v okviru iste preiskave zahtevajo izvršitev v vsaj dveh državah članicah.
Eurojust should only undertake such coordination with the agreement of the Member States concerned.
Eurojust bi moral tako usklajevanje izvajati le s soglasjem zadevnih držav članic.
To guarantee the full autonomy and independence of Eurojust, it should be granted an autonomous budget sufficient to properly carry out its work, with revenue coming essentially from a contribution from the budget of the Union, except as regards the salaries and emoluments of the national members, deputies and Assistants, which are borne by their Member State.
Da bi zagotovili popolno samostojnost in neodvisnost Eurojusta, bi mu bilo treba zagotoviti avtonomni proračun, ki zadostuje za ustrezno izvajanje njegovega dela, prihodki pa bi morali biti zlasti prispevki iz proračuna Unije, razen kar zadeva plače in druge prejemke nacionalnih članov, namestnikov in pomočnikov, ki bremenijo njihove države članice.
The Union budgetary procedure should be applicable as far as the Union contribution and other subsidies chargeable to the general budget of the Union are concerned.
Za prispevek Unije in druge subvencije v breme splošnega proračuna Unije bi bilo treba uporabiti proračunski postopek Unije.
The auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors and approved by the Committee on Budgetary Control of the European Parliament.
Revizijo zaključnih računov bi moralo opravljati Računsko sodišče, nato pa bi jo moral Odbor za proračunski nadzor Evropskega parlamenta potrditi.
In order to increase the transparency and democratic oversight of Eurojust, it is necessary to provide a mechanism pursuant to Article 85(1) TFEU for the joint evaluation of Eurojust’s activities by the European Parliament and national parliaments.
Da bi povečali preglednost in demokratični nadzor nad Eurojustom, je treba zagotoviti mehanizem na podlagi člena 85(1) PDEU, da bodo lahko Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti skupaj ocenili dejavnosti Eurojusta.
The evaluation should take place in the framework of an inter-parliamentary committee meeting in the premises of the European Parliament in Brussels, with the participation of members of the competent committees of the European Parliament and of the national parliaments.
Ocenjevanje bi moralo potekati v okviru medparlamentarne seje odbora v prostorih Evropskega parlamenta v Bruslju, na njej pa bi sodelovali člani pristojnih odborov Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov.
The interparliamentary committee meeting should fully respect Eurojust’s independence as regards actions to be taken in specific operational cases and as regards the obligation of discretion and confidentiality.
Medparlamentarna seja odbora bi morala v celoti spoštovati neodvisnost Eurojusta pri izvajanju ukrepov v posebnih operativnih zadevah in kar zadeva obveznost glede nerazkrivanja in zaupnosti.
It is appropriate to evaluate the application of this Regulation regularly.
Primerno je, da se uporaba te uredbe redno ocenjuje.
Eurojust’s functioning should be transparent in accordance with Article 15(3) TFEU.
Delovanje Eurojusta bi moralo biti pregledno v skladu s členom 15(3) PDEU.
Specific provisions on how the right of public access to documents is ensured should be adopted by the College.
Kolegij bi moral sprejeti posebne določbe o tem, kako se zagotovi pravica javnosti do dostopa do dokumentov.
Nothing in this Regulation is intended to restrict the right of public access to documents in so far as it is guaranteed in the Union and in the Member States, in particular under Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’).
Nobena določba v tej uredbi nima namena omejevati pravice javnosti do dostopa do dokumentov, ki je zagotovljena v Uniji in državah članicah, zlasti na podlagi člena 42 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina).
The general rules on transparency that apply to Union agencies should also apply to Eurojust in a way that does not jeopardise in any manner the obligation of confidentiality in its operational work.
Splošna pravila o preglednosti, ki se uporabljajo za agencije Unije, bi morala veljati tudi za Eurojust, vendar tako, da v okviru njegovih operativnih dejavnosti nikakor ne bi bila ogrožena obveznost glede zaupnosti.
Administrative inquiries conducted by the European Ombudsman should respect the obligation of confidentiality of Eurojust.
Enako bi bilo treba pri upravnih poizvedbah, ki jih izvaja Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, spoštovati obveznosti Eurojusta glede zaupnosti.
In order to increase Eurojust’s transparency vis-à-vis Union citizens and its accountability, Eurojust should publish a list of its Executive Board members on its website and, where appropriate, summaries of the outcome of the meetings of the Executive Board, while respecting data protection requirements.
Poleg tega bi moral Eurojust za večjo preglednost pri svojih odnosih z državljani Unije in povečanje svoje odgovornosti na svojem spletnem mestu objaviti seznam članov izvršnega odbora in, kadar je to primerno, povzetke izidov sej izvršnega odbora, pri čemer bi se upoštevale zahteve glede varstva podatkov.
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council should apply to Eurojust.
Za Eurojust bi bilo treba uporabljati Uredbo (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council should apply to Eurojust.
Za Eurojust bi bilo treba uporabljati Uredbo (EU, Euratom) št. 883/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
The necessary provisions regarding accommodation for Eurojust in the Member State in which it has its headquarters, that is to say in the Netherlands, and the specific rules applicable to all Eurojust’s staff and members of their families should be laid down in a headquarters agreement.
Potrebne določbe glede namestitve Eurojusta v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež, tj. na Nizozemskem, in posebna pravila, ki se uporabljajo za vse člane osebja Eurojusta in njihove družinske člane, bi bilo treba določiti v sporazumu o sedežu.
The host Member State should provide the best possible conditions to ensure the functioning of Eurojust, including multilingual, European-oriented schooling and appropriate transport connections, so as to attract high-quality human resources from as wide a geographical area as possible.
Država članica gostiteljica bi morala zagotoviti kar najboljše možne pogoje za zagotovitev delovanja Eurojusta, vključno z večjezičnim, evropsko naravnanim šolanjem in ustreznimi prometnimi povezavami, da bi lahko pridobila visokokakovostne človeške vire s čim širšega geografskega območja.
Eurojust as established by this Regulation should be the legal successor of Eurojust as established by Decision 2002/187/JHA with respect to all its contractual obligations, including employment contracts, liabilities and properties acquired.
Eurojust, kakor ga ustanavlja ta uredba, bi moral biti pravni naslednik Eurojusta, kakor je bil ustanovljen s Sklepom 2002/187/PNZ, v vseh njegovih pogodbenih obveznostih, vključno s pogodbami o zaposlitvi, ter v vseh njegovih nepogodbenih obveznostih in lastninskih razmerjih.
International agreements concluded by Eurojust as established by that Decision should remain in force.
Mednarodni sporazumi, ki jih je sklenil Eurojust, kakor je bil ustanovljen z navedenim sklepom, bi morali ostati veljavni.
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the setting up of an entity responsible for supporting and strengthening coordination and cooperation between judicial authorities of the Member States in relation to serious crime affecting two or more Member States or requiring a prosecution on common bases, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU.
Ker cilja te uredbe, in sicer ustanovitve subjekta, pristojnega za podporo in krepitev usklajevanja in sodelovanja med pravosodnimi organi držav članic v zvezi s hudimi kaznivimi dejanji, ki se nanašajo na dve ali več držav članic ali terjajo skupni pregon, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepa lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 PEU.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenega cilja.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 and Article 4a(1) of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, those Member States are not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and are not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 ter členom 4a(1) Protokola št. 21 o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, in brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola ti državi članici ne sodelujeta pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanju ni zavezujoča in se v njiju ne uporablja.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 22 o stališču Danske, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
The EDPS was consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and delivered an opinion on 5 March 2014.
Opravljeno je bilo posvetovanje z ENVP v skladu s členom 28(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ki je podal mnenje 5. marca 2014.
This Regulation fully respects the fundamental rights and safeguards and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter,
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in jamstva ter upošteva načela, priznana zlasti v Listini –
CHAPTER I
POGLAVJE I
ESTABLISHMENT, OBJECTIVES AND TASKS OF EUROJUST
USTANOVITEV, CILJI IN NALOGE EUROJUSTA
Establishment of the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation
Ustanovitev Agencije Evropske unije za pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah
The European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) is hereby established.
Ustanovi se Agencija Evropske unije za pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah (Eurojust).
Eurojust as established by this Regulation shall replace and succeed Eurojust as established by Decision 2002/187/JHA.
Eurojust, kakor je ustanovljen s to uredbo, nadomesti in nasledi Eurojust, kakor je bil ustanovljen s Sklepom 2002/187/PNZ.
Eurojust shall have legal personality.
Eurojust ima pravno osebnost.
Eurojust shall support and strengthen coordination and cooperation between national investigating and prosecuting authorities in relation to serious crime which Eurojust is competent to deal with in accordance with Article 3(1) and (3), where that crime affects two or more Member States, or requires prosecution on common bases, on the basis of operations conducted and information supplied by the Member States’ authorities, by Europol, by the EPPO and by OLAF.
Eurojust podpira in krepi usklajevanje in sodelovanje nacionalnih organov, pristojnih za preiskovanje in pregon, v zvezi s hudimi kaznivimi dejanji, za katera je v skladu s členom 3(1) in (3) pristojen Eurojust, kadar se ta kazniva dejanja nanašajo na dve ali več držav članic ali terjajo skupni pregon, in sicer na podlagi operacij, ki jih izvajajo organi držav članic, Europol, EJT in OLAF, ter informacij, ki jih ti pošljejo.
In carrying out its tasks, Eurojust shall:
Eurojust pri izvajanju svojih nalog:
take into account any request emanating from a competent authority of a Member State, any information provided by Union authorities, institutions, bodies, offices and agencies competent by virtue of provisions adopted within the framework of the Treaties and any information collected by Eurojust itself;
upošteva vsako zaprosilo pristojnega organa države članice oziroma informacije, ki jih posredujejo organi, institucije, telesa, uradi in agencije Unije, pristojni na podlagi določb, sprejetih v okviru Pogodb, in vseh informacij, ki jih zbere Eurojust sam;
facilitate the execution of requests for, and decisions on, judicial cooperation, including requests and decisions based on instruments that give effect to the principle of mutual recognition.
lajša izvrševanje zaprosil za pravosodno sodelovanje in odločitev o njem, tudi zaprosil in odločitev na podlagi pravnih aktov, ki uveljavljajo načelo vzajemnega priznavanja.
Eurojust shall carry out its tasks at the request of the competent authorities of the Member States, on its own initiative or at the request of the EPPO within the limits of the EPPO’s competence.
Eurojust izvršuje svoje naloge na zahtevo pristojnih organov držav članic, na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo EJT v mejah pristojnosti EJT.
Competence of Eurojust
Pristojnosti Eurojusta
Eurojust shall be competent with respect to the forms of serious crime listed in Annex I. However, as of the date on which the EPPO assumes its investigative and prosecutorial tasks in accordance with Article 120(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, Eurojust shall not exercise its competence with regard to crimes for which the EPPO exercises its competence, except in those cases where Member States which do not participate in enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO are also involved and at the request of those Member States or at the request of the EPPO.
Eurojust je pristojen za obravnavo oblik kaznivih dejanj, ki so navedene v Prilogi I. Vendar od datuma, ko EJT prevzame svoje preiskovalne in tožilske naloge v skladu s členom 120(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1939, Eurojust ne izvršuje svoje pristojnosti v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, za obravnavo katerih izvršuje svojo pristojnost EJT, razen v primerih, ki vključujejo tudi države članice, ki niso vključene v okrepljeno sodelovanje za ustanovitev EJT, ter na zahtevo teh držav članic ali EJT.
Eurojust shall exercise its competence for crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union in cases involving Member States which participate in enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO but in respect of which the EPPO does not have competence or decides not to exercise its competence.
Eurojust izvršuje svojo pristojnost za kazniva dejanja, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, v primerih, ki vključujejo države članice, vključene v okrepljeno sodelovanje za ustanovitev EJT, za katere pa EJT ni pristojen ali se odloči, da svoje pristojnosti ne bo izvrševal.
Eurojust, the EPPO and the Member States concerned shall consult and cooperate with each other to facilitate Eurojust’s exercise of competence under this paragraph.
Z namenom lažjega izvajanja pristojnosti Eurojusta v skladu s tem odstavkom se Eurojust, EJT in zadevne države članice medsebojno sodelujejo in se posvetujejo.
The practical details of its exercise of competence under this paragraph shall be governed by a working arrangement as referred to in Article 47(3).
Praktične podrobnosti o izvajanju pristojnosti Eurojusta v skladu s tem odstavkom ureja delovni dogovor iz člena 47(3).
As regards forms of crime other than those listed in Annex I, Eurojust may also, in accordance with its tasks, assist with investigations and prosecutions where requested by a competent authority of a Member State.
Kar zadeva oblike kaznivih dejanj, ki niso navedene v Prilogi I, lahko Eurojust v skladu s svojimi nalogami na zaprosilo pristojnega organa države članice pomaga pri preiskovanju in pregonu.
Eurojust’s competence shall cover criminal offences related to the criminal offences listed in Annex I. The following categories of offences shall be regarded as related criminal offences:
Eurojust je pristojen tudi za obravnavo kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s kaznivimi dejanji, navedenimi v Prilogi I. Za povezana kazniva dejanja se štejejo naslednje vrste kaznivih dejanj:
criminal offences committed in order to procure the means of committing the serious crimes listed in Annex I;
kazniva dejanja, storjena z namenom pridobitve sredstev za storitev hudih kaznivih dejanj, navedenih v Prilogi I;
criminal offences committed in order to facilitate or commit the serious crimes listed in Annex I;
kazniva dejanja, storjena z namenom lajšanja ali storitve hudih kaznivih dejanj, navedenih v Prilogi I;
criminal offences committed in order to ensure the impunity of those committing the serious crimes listed in Annex I.
kazniva dejanja, storjena z namenom zagotovitve nekaznovanosti storilcev hudih kaznivih dejanj, navedenih v Prilogi I.
At the request of a Member State’s competent authority, Eurojust may also assist with investigations and prosecutions that only affect that Member State and a third country, provided that a cooperation agreement or arrangement establishing cooperation pursuant to Article 52 has been concluded with that third country or provided that in a specific case there is an essential interest in providing such assistance.
Eurojust lahko na zaprosilo pristojnega organa države članice pomaga tudi pri preiskovanju in pregonu, ki se nanašata samo na to državo članico in tretjo državo, če je bil z navedeno tretjo državo sklenjen sporazum ali dogovor o sodelovanju na podlagi člena 52, ali če je v posebnem primeru nudenje tovrstne pomoči bistvenega pomena.
At the request of either the competent authority of a Member State or the Commission, Eurojust may assist in investigations and prosecutions that only affect that Member State but which have repercussions at Union level.
Eurojust lahko na zaprosilo pristojnega organa države članice ali Komisije pomaga pri preiskovanju in pregonu, ki se nanašata samo na to državo članico, vendar imata posledice na ravni Unije.
Before acting at the request of the Commission, Eurojust shall consult the competent authority of the Member State concerned.
Preden ukrepa na zaprosilo Komisije, se Eurojust posvetuje s pristojnim organom zadevne države članice.
That competent authority may, within a deadline set by Eurojust, oppose the execution of the request by Eurojust, justifying its position in every case.
Ta pristojni organ lahko v roku, ki ga določi Eurojust, nasprotuje Eurojustovi izvršitvi zaprosila, v vsakem primeru pa utemelji svoje stališče.