natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the Opening Decision the Commission expressed doubts on the market conformity of the lease, because its calculation formula included an unexplained depreciation factor of 2/3.
Komisija je v sklepu o začetku postopka izrazila pomislek glede skladnosti zakupa s tržnimi pravili, saj je enačba za njegov izračun vključevala nepojasnjen dvotretjinski faktor amortizacije.
SLA concerning personnel training
Sporazum o ravni storitve za usposabljanje osebja
Pursuant to the SLA for personnel training of […], OSE provided TRAINOSE with technical and professional training of staff dealing with circulation and safety (e.g. training and licensing to work on electrified railway networks).
V skladu s sporazumom o ravni storitve za usposabljanje osebja z dne […] je družba OSE družbi Trainose zagotovila tehnično in strokovno usposabljanje osebja na področju uporabe infrastrukture in varnosti (npr. usposabljanje in podeljevanje licenc za delo na elektrificiranih železniških omrežjih).
The indicative costs of TRAINOSE for these services were set at EUR [0-5] million per year.
Okvirni stroški družbe Trainose za te storitve so bili določeni na [0–5] milijonov EUR na leto.
The fee was a function of the total number of training hours carried out and the number of participating staff, with EUR [0-30] per hour for groups over 15 persons, EUR [20-40] per hour for groups between 10 and 15 persons and EUR [20-40] per hour for groups between 5 and 9 persons.
Pristojbina se je izračunala glede na skupno število izvedenih ur usposabljanja in število sodelujočih oseb, pri čemer je bila urna postavka za skupine več kot 15 oseb [0–30] EUR, za skupine od 10 do 15 oseb [20–40] EUR in za skupine od pet do devet oseb [20–40] EUR.
The training was provided at OSE's premises and in situ on the rail network.
Usposabljanje se je izvajalo v prostorih družbe OSE in na zadevni lokaciji železniškega omrežja.
The training charges included training personnel fees, costs of the training material, equipment, premises and all related taxes and duties.
Stroški za usposabljanje so vključevali pristojbine za izvajalce usposabljanja, stroške za gradivo, opremo in prostore za usposabljanje ter vse s tem povezane davke in dajatve.
The duration of the SLA was two years, with a possibility of an extension for one additional year.
Sporazum o ravni storitve je veljal dve leti z možnostjo podaljšanja za dodatno leto.
In the Opening Decision the Commission expressed doubts as to whether the submitted training fees reflected market fees, because Greece had not provided detailed information concerning similar trainings by other providers.
Komisija je v sklepu o začetku postopka izrazila pomisleke, ali so navedene pristojbine za usposabljanje izražale tržne pristojbine, saj Grčija ni predložila podrobnih informacij o podobnih usposabljanjih drugih ponudnikov.
SLA concerning office rental
Sporazum o ravni storitve za najem pisarniških prostorov
Pursuant to the SLA between GAIAOSE (until 2013 the real estate subsidiary of OSE) and TRAINOSE of […], TRAINOSE was leasing offices of [0-5000] m2 for EUR [0-50000] per month (EUR [0-15]/m2), for a period of [0-5] years.
V skladu s sporazumom o ravni storitve med družbo Gaiaose (do leta 2013 nepremičninsko odvisno podjetje družbe OSE) in družbo Trainose z dne […] je družba Trainose zakupila [0–5000] m2 pisarniških prostorov za [0–50000] EUR na mesec ([0–15] EUR/m2) za obdobje [0–5] let.
The lease was adjustable to changes of the Consumer Price Index (‘CPI’) on an annual basis.
Zakup se je letno prilagajal spremembam indeksa cen življenjskih potrebščin.
TRAINOSE had to deposit a guarantee of two months of lease (EUR [0-50] for the first year, which had to be adjusted on an annual basis).
Družba Trainose je morala položiti jamstvo v višini dvomesečnega zakupa ([0–50] EUR za prvo leto, pri čemer je bilo treba znesek vsako leto prilagoditi).
All taxes, duties and expenses related to the lease (electricity, maintenance costs, etc.) were paid by TRAINOSE.
Vse davke, dajatve in stroške, povezane z zakupom (električna energija, stroški vzdrževanja itd.), je plačala družba Trainose.
In the Opening Decision the Commission expressed doubts as to whether the monthly lease charged to TRAINOSE was market conform, as it seemed to have been calculated by TRAINOSE itself and not by an independent evaluator.
Komisija je v sklepu o začetku postopka izrazila pomisleke, ali je bil znesek mesečnega zakupa, zaračunan družbi Trainose, skladen s trgom, saj se je zdelo, da ga je izračunala družba Trainose sama, ne pa neodvisni ocenjevalec.
SLA concerning coach rental
Sporazum o ravni storitve za najem avtobusov
According to the SLA concerning coach rental concluded between OSE and TRAINOSE on […], TRAINOSE was leasing [20-50] coaches, [0-10] tank trucks, [10-25] trucks and [0-10] passenger cars for a period of [0-5] years, with a possibility of an extension for one additional year.
V skladu s sporazumom o ravni storitve za najem avtobusov, sklenjenim med družbama OSE in Trainose dne […], je družba Trainose zakupila [20–50] avtobusov, [0–10] tovornjakov s cisterno, [10–25] tovornjakov in [0–10] osebnih avtomobilov za obdobje [0–5] let z možnostjo podaljšanja za eno dodatno leto.
The costs of TRAINOSE for the coach rental was set at EUR [0-5] million per year.
Stroški družbe Trainose za najem avtobusov so bili določeni na [0–5] milijonov EUR na leto.
The lease amount was a function of the value of the vehicles on […] […], discounted by [5-10] % on an annual basis for depreciation.
Znesek zakupa je bil odvisen od vrednosti vozil na […] […], zmanjšane za [5–10] % na letni ravni za amortizacijo.
TRAINOSE paid the circulation tax as well as the maintenance and the insurance expenses.
Družba Trainose je plačala davek za uporabo cest ter stroške vzdrževanja in zavarovanja.
In the Opening Decision, the Commission expressed doubts as to whether the annual leasing costs were at a market level, since they were based on the vehicles' current value whereas they should rather depend on the supply and demand for those assets.
Komisija je v sklepu o začetku postopka izrazila pomisleke, ali so bili letni stroški zakupa na tržni ravni, saj so temeljili na trenutni vrednosti vozil, namesto da bi bili odvisni od ponudbe in povpraševanja v zvezi s temi sredstvi.
Measure 6: Transfer of freight terminals from OSE to TRAINOSE
Ukrep 6: prenos tovornih terminalov z družbe OSE na družbo Trainose
Initially Greece envisaged transferring five terminals owned by OSE to TRAINOSE.
Grčija je sprva predvidevala prenos lastništva petih terminalov z družbe OSE na družbo Trainose.
By letter dated 1 July 2013, Greece informed the Commission that it had withdrawn this measure.
Z dopisom z dne 1. julija 2013 je Komisijo obvestila, da je ta ukrep umaknila.
In the Opening Decision the Commission expressed doubts as to whether, in the absence of complete information on the entrustment acts and compensation methodology, Measures 1 and 3 could be considered compatible with the internal market pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
Komisija je v sklepu o začetku postopka izrazila pomisleke, ali bi se lahko ukrepa 1 in 3 glede na nepopolne informacije o aktih pooblastitve in metodologiji v zvezi z nadomestilom štela za združljiva z notranjim trgom v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1370/2007.
In the Opening Decision, the Commission also assessed the compatibility of the measures with the internal market under the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty (‘R&R Guidelines’).
Komisija je v sklepu o začetku postopka ocenila tudi združljivost ukrepov z notranjim trgom na podlagi Smernic o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje nefinančnih podjetij v težavah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: smernice za reševanje in prestrukturiranje).
In particular, the Commission expressed doubts as to whether the proposed restructuring plan of TRAINOSE was based on realistic assumptions with regard to future operating conditions and whether it would restore TRAINOSE's long-term viability within a reasonable timescale.
Zlasti je izrazila pomisleke, ali predlagani načrt za prestrukturiranje družbe Trainose temelji na realnih predpostavkah v zvezi s prihodnjimi pogoji obratovanja in ali se bo z njim v razumnem roku obnovila dolgoročna sposobnost preživetja družbe Trainose.
The Commission also questioned whether the proposed compensatory measures would be sufficient to compensate for the distortion of competition induced by the restructuring aid.
Dvomila je tudi, da bodo predlagani izravnalni ukrepi dovolj za izravnavo izkrivljanja konkurence, ki je nastalo zaradi pomoči za prestrukturiranje.
In addition, the Commission expressed doubts as to whether TRAINOSE would be able to provide a significant own contribution to its restructuring.
Ob tem je še izrazila pomisleke, ali bi lahko družba Trainose zagotovila precejšen lastni prispevek za svoje prestrukturiranje.
Moreover, in the absence of sufficient information, the Commission was unable to assess whether the ‘one time, last time’ criterion was complied with.
Poleg tega zaradi nezadostnih informacij ni mogla oceniti, ali je bilo izpolnjeno merilo „enkrat in zadnjič“.
In the Opening Decision, the Commission announced that it would explore whether the notified measures may be considered compatible aid under Article 107(3)(b) of the Treaty.
Komisija je v sklepu o začetku postopka napovedala, da bo proučila, ali bi se lahko priglašeni ukrepi šteli za združljivo pomoč v skladu s členom 107(3)(b) Pogodbe.
The Commission observed that rail transport may constitute an essential service for the functioning of the economy of a Member State, and that an interruption in rail transport may trigger systemic knock-on effects on the entire economy, in particular due to interruptions in the supply chain.
Ugotovila je, da lahko železniški prevoz pomeni ključno storitev za delovanje gospodarstva države članice in da lahko ima prekinitev železniškega prevoza odločilne sistemske učinke na celotno gospodarstvo, zlasti zaradi prekinitev v dobavni verigi.
The Commission underlined that these effects could be particularly severe in countries undergoing macroeconomic restructuring.
Poudarila je, da bi lahko bili ti učinki zlasti neprizanesljivi v državah, v katerih poteka makroekonomsko prestrukturiranje.
However, in the absence of sufficient information, the Commission was not in a position to establish whether the aid could be deemed to contribute to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of Greece.
Vendar zaradi nezadostnih informacij ni mogla ugotoviti, ali bi se lahko štelo, da pomoč prispeva k odpravljanju resnih motenj v gospodarstvu Grčije.
It therefore invited Greece and interested parties to submit any relevant information in this regard.
Zato je Grčijo in zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo vse zadevne relevantne informacije.
Following the publication of the Opening Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union, no interested party submitted comments.
Po objavi sklepa o začetku postopka v Uradnem listu Evropske unije pripomb ni predložila nobena zainteresirana stran.
Furthermore, the railway sector is a crucial sector in the Greek economy due to both the employment it sustains and its role in the supply chain in Greece.
Če bi Komisija ugotovila, da ti ukrepi delno ali v celoti pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe, bi se morala pomoč šteti za združljivo s Pogodbo.
Greece asserted that the measures described in the Opening Decision do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Grčija je v odgovoru na sklep o začetku postopka navedla dodatna pojasnila o ukrepih, opisanih v oddelku 3, in njihovi združljivosti.
Should the Commission conclude that these measures constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty, be it in part or in totality, then the aid should be deemed compatible with the Treaty.
Grčija je z dopisom z dne 23. marca 2017 pojasnila, da neporavnani dolg, ki naj bi bil preklican, znaša 748,6 milijona EUR (glej preglednico 2).
In its reply to the Opening Decision, Greece provided further clarifications on the measures described in the Section 3 and their compatibility.
Preklic skupnega dolga bi moral za družbo Trainose pomeniti nadomestilo za nedonosno upravljanje 26 potniških prog, ki je posledica obveznosti javne službe in oblikovanja cen, ki pomeni obveznost javne službe, določeno z grško zakonodajo.
By letter dated 23 March 2017, Greece clarified that the outstanding debts envisaged to be cancelled amount to EUR 748,6 million (see Table 2).
Po mnenju Grčije ni država nikoli spoštovala svojih obveznosti glede nadomestila družbi Trainose za izgube, ki so nastale zaradi izpolnjevanja teh obveznosti javne službe in oblikovanja cen.
The cancellation of accumulated debts should compensate TRAINOSE for the unprofitable operation of 26 passenger routes as a result of the service and pricing obligations (‘SPOs’), which represent SPOs imposed by Greek law.
Preklic tega dolga naj ne bi pomenil neupravičene gospodarske prednosti za družbo Trainose, saj bi bila družba v skladu z grško zakonodajo upravičena, da nadomestilo zahteva kot odškodnino.
According to Greece, the State never respected its commitments to compensate TRAINOSE for the losses resulting from discharging these SPOs.
Vendar sodni postopek ni bil uporabljen, saj bi to lahko pomenilo zamudo pri prestrukturiranju družbe Trainose.
The cancellation of these debts will allegedly not provide any undue economic advantage to TRAINOSE, because the company would be entitled under Greek law to claim this compensation as compensatory damages.
Zato Grčija meni, da, kot je med drugim odločilo Sodišče v sodbi Asteris in kot je trdila Komisija v zadevi v zvezi z razlastitvijo nemških kmetov, nadomestilo za škodo, nastalo zaradi ukrepov, ki jih je mogoče pripisati državi, ali njihovega pomanjkanja, ne pomeni državne pomoči.
A judicial approach was however not pursued, because this could delay TRAINOSE's restructuring.
Grčija je trdila, da je bilo nadomestilo, čeprav je bilo določeno naknadno, izračunano na način, ki je zagotovil, da bo čim bliže ravni, na kateri bi bilo, če bi bilo izračunano predhodno, rezultat pa je bil blizu ocene iz poslovnega načrta družbe Trainose za leto 2007 na podlagi podatkov iz leta 2005.
Therefore, Greece considers that as established by the Court, inter alia, in the Asteris judgment, and held by the Commission in a case relating to the expropriation of German farmers, compensation for damages incurred for acts/lack of action imputable to the State does not constitute State aid.
Podlaga za izračun so bile izgube, ki bi jih družba Trainose utrpela, če bi po izvedbi načrta za prestrukturiranje upravljala celotno omrežje, tj. brez preteklih pomanjkljivosti.
Greece asserted that, although the compensation was determined ex post, it was still calculated in a way that ensured that it would be as close as possible to its level had it been calculated ex ante, and produced a result close to the estimation included in TRAINOSE's business plan for 2007 on the basis of the 2005 data.
To pomeni, da naknadno nadomestilo za obveznost javne službe ni bilo izračunano na podlagi izgub družbe Trainose na progo v letu 2010, ampak na podlagi izgub prestrukturirane družbe Trainose, tj. dobro vodene družbe, ki ima v lasti ustrezna prevozna sredstva in bi lahko izpolnila potrebne obveznosti javne službe.
The basis of the calculation were the losses TRAINOSE would have incurred if it operated the entire network after the implementation of the restructuring plan, i.e. excluding any past inefficiencies.
Zato je Grčija trdila, da ni tveganja internalizacije preteklih pomanjkljivosti in da nadomestilo ne presega zneska, ki je potreben za kritje vseh nastalih stroškov, od katerega se odštejejo vsi relevantni prihodki in ne vključuje razumnega dobička, do katerega bi bila družba Trainose upravičena.
In other words, the ex post PSO compensation was not calculated on the basis of TRAINOSE's losses per line in 2010, but on the basis of losses of a restructured TRAINOSE, i.e. a well-run company possessing adequate means of transport, which would be able to meet the necessary PSOs.
Grčija je znova poudarila, da povečanje lastniškega kapitala v višini 60 milijonov EUR iz leta 2009 ni vključevalo državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe, če je bil ta ukrep skladen z načelom udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu.
Therefore, Greece submitted that there is no risk of any internalisation of past inefficiencies and that the compensation does not exceed what is necessary to cover all the incurred costs minus all the relevant revenues and without including any reasonable profit, to which TRAINOSE would be entitled to.
Druga tranša povečanja lastniškega kapitala v višini 65 milijonov EUR ni bila izvedena, zato bi se morala šteti za umaknjeno.
Greece reiterated that the equity increase of EUR 60 million performed in 2009 did not involve State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty, insofar as this measure was in conformity with the market economy operator (‘MEO’) principle.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so bile na voljo v času povečanja lastniškega kapitala, in ob upoštevanju, da je bilo glede na privatizacijo družbe Trainose prestrukturiranje družbe predvideno že v letu 2009, je Grčija poudarila, da je pričakovala sprejemljiv donos na vložena sredstva v razumnem času.
The second tranche of the equity increase of EUR 65 million was not carried out and should be considered withdrawn.
Odločitev o povečanju lastniškega kapitala so spodbudili naslednji premisleki:
On the basis of the information that was available at the time of the equity increase, and taking into account that already in 2009 a company restructuring was envisaged in view of a privatisation of TRAINOSE, Greece underlined that it expected an acceptable return on the injected capital within a reasonable period.
prizadevanje za preprečitev propada edinega upravljavca (v 100-odstotni državni lasti), ki izvaja storitve železniškega prevoza v Grčiji, in zagotovitev njegove dolgoročne donosnosti;
The decision to increase equity was motivated by the following considerations:
možnosti privatizacije družbe in torej doseganje čim večjega možnega donosa takšne transakcije;
the desire to avoid the collapse of the sole operator (100 % State owned) providing rail transport services in Greece and to ensure its long-term profitability;
prizadevanje za preprečitev ustavitve raznih komercialnih dejavnosti družbe OSE, upravljavca infrastrukture, ki je prav tako v 100-odstotni državni lasti.
the prospects of privatising the company and thus achieving the highest possible return from such transaction;
Grčija je trdila, da so bili navedeni premisleki v skladu s sodno prakso evropskih sodišč, na podlagi katere bi bilo sprejemljivo upoštevati tudi posredno premoženjsko korist, kot je prizadevanje za zaščito podobe skupine ali preusmeritev njenih dejavnosti.
the desire to avoid the shutdown of various commercial activities of OSE, the infrastructure manager, also 100 % owned by the State.
Edina nadomestna možnost, ki je bila na voljo, je bila likvidacija družbe Trainose, ki bi imela katastrofalne posledice tako za državo, ki je njen edini delničar, kot za grško gospodarstvo.
Greece argued that those considerations were in conformity with the case law of the European Courts, according to which it would be acceptable to take into account also an indirect material benefit, such as the desire to protect the group's image or to redirect its activities.
Ker družba Trainose ni imela precejšnjih sredstev, ki bi vlagatelju lastniškega kapitala omogočala kakršno koli povračilo vloženega kapitala, bi Grčija izgubila svojo naložbo v družbo.
The only alternative option available was the liquidation of TRAINOSE, which would have disastrous consequences both for the State, being its sole shareholder, and the Greek economy.
Poleg tega bi Grčija izgubila svojega edinega železniškega prevoznika in ogrozila tudi upravljavca železniške infrastrukture, tj. družbo OSE.
Because TRAINOSE had no significant assets allowing an equity investor to recover any of its invested capital, the Greek state would have lost its investment into the company.
Grčija je izrazila pomislek, da bi lahko kot trenutni delničar sprejela začasen nižji donos ob povečanju svoje obstoječe naložbe.
Moreover, Greece would have lost its only railway operator and would endanger also its rail infrastructure manager OSE.
Premisleki o izključno kratkoročnem dobičku bi javni organ, ki upravlja podjetje ali skupino podjetij, manj spodbujali.
Greece alleged that, in its capacity as current shareholder, it could accept temporary lower returns when increasing its existing investment.
Grčija je pojasnila, da so bila letna nepovratna sredstva za obdobje 2011–2013 družbi Trainose dodeljena v dogovoru s trojko, da bi se družbi omogočila izpolnitev praga donosnosti ob nadaljnjem upravljanju več prog, ki povzročajo izgubo.
A public authority that controls an undertaking or a group of undertakings would be less motivated by purely short-term profit considerations.
Nadomestilo se dodeli na podlagi sporazuma o obveznosti javne službe, ki je bil sklenjen neposredno brez javnega razpisa.
Greece clarified that the annual grants to TRAINOSE for the period 2011 to 2013 were awarded in agreement with the Troika in order to allow the company to break-even while maintaining the operation of a number of loss-making routes.
Sporazum o obveznosti javne službe je bil podpisan 15. junija 2011.
The compensation is granted on a basis of a PSO Agreement, which was awarded directly without a public tender.
Grčija je trdila, da je sporazum o obveznosti javne službe skladen z Uredbo (ES) št. 1370/2007, razen obveznosti v zvezi s predhodno objavo nekaterih informacij v Uradnem listu.
The PSO Agreement was signed on 15 June 2011 Greece submitted that the PSO Agreement complies with Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, except for the obligation for prior publication of certain information in the Official Journal.
Grčija je trdila, da parametri izračuna iz sporazuma o obveznosti javne službe izpolnjujejo zahteve Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007.
Greece asserted that the calculation parameters of the PSO Agreement comply with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
Ker družba Trainose vse od ustanovitve ni imela ločenih računov, je izračun nadomestila temeljil na njenih najnovejših ocenah in predpostavkah (poslovodni izkazi).
Due to the absence of account separation of TRAINOSE since its incorporation, the calculation of the compensation was based on the most up-to-date estimates and assumptions of TRAINOSE (management accounts).
Od oktobra 2011 je vodila ločene račune za dejavnosti, povezane z obveznostjo javne službe, in dejavnosti, ki niso povezane z obveznostjo javne službe, ter torej preprečila vsakršno navzkrižno subvencioniranje različnih dejavnosti.
As from October 2011, TRAINOSE maintained separate accounts for the PSO and non-PSO activities and hence avoided any cross-subsidisation between the different activities.
Ločeni računi so se na podlagi poslovodnih izkazov naknadno uporabili tudi za obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 30. septembra 2011.
The account separation was also applied ex post for the period from 1 January 2011 to 30 September 2011 on the basis of management accounts.
Nadomestilo za obveznost javne službe je bilo v dogovoru s trojko omejeno na 50 milijonov EUR na leto.
The PSO compensation was capped in agreement with the Troika at EUR 50 million per annum.
Sporazum o obveznosti javne službe je vseboval določbe, ki so omogočale spremembo nadomestila za obveznost javne službe (kot je zmanjšanje obsega storitev) v primeru večjih stroškov ali nižjih prihodkov, da bi se ohranila omejitev na 50 milijonov EUR na leto.
The PSO Agreement contained provisions providing for the possibility to modify the PSO compensation (such as reduction of the scope of services) in case of increase of costs or decrease of revenues, in order to maintain the cap of EUR 50 million per annum.
Veljavno pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe glede železniškega potniškega prevoza je bilo treba z neposredno oddajo družbi Trainose obnoviti do konca aprila 2014, trajala pa bi lahko največ pet let.