natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, the trend taken over the whole period considered supports the existence of a causal link, both in terms of volumes and market shares.
Poleg tega je FCI trdilo, da dejstvo, da proizvajalci Unije kljub zvišanju cen kitajskih izdelkov niso povečali dobičkonosnosti svoje prodaje, jasno dokazuje, da morebitne znatne škode v obravnavanem obdobju ni mogoče pripisati uvozu iz LRK.
Therefore, the Commission concluded that there was an overall coincidence in time between the upward movement in Chinese imports and the downward movement in the injury indicators regarding the Union industry.
Komisija je te trditve zavrnila, saj je dampinški uvoz iz LRK povzročil znatno nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen proizvajalcev Unije, tudi po zvišanju cen v obravnavanem obdobju, in zato povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije.
FCI submitted that the sales prices of the Union producers have constantly declined between 2013 and the investigation period even when prices of Chinese imports increased by 4 % between 2013 and the investigation period.
Po končnem razkritju je FCI znova izpostavilo to vprašanje in zahtevalo, naj Komisija pojasni vzročno zvezo kljub različnim trendom od leta 2014 naprej, ko se je uvoz iz LRK zmanjšal (– 8 %), medtem ko so se cene kitajskih izdelkov povečale (+ 1 %), tržni delež industrije Unije pa je ostal nespremenjen (58,8 %).
The two trends are clearly divergent and, as a result, no impact on the sales prices of the Union producers can be attributed to the pricing strategy of the Chinese exporting producers.
Komisija je opozorila, da pri ugotavljanju trenda prouči celotno obravnavano obdobje, da bi se izognila učinkom običajnih gospodarskih nihanj.
Furthermore, FCI submitted that the fact that Union producers have not increased the profitability of their sales even though the prices for Chinese products increased, is a clear demonstration that any material injury during the period considered cannot be attributed to imports from the PRC.
Poleg tega se je tržni delež uvoza iz LRK povečal tudi, ko se je v obravnavanem obdobju potrošnja Unije zmanjšala.
The Commission rejected these submissions, because the dumped imports from the PRC, even after the price increase over the period considered, undercut significantly the prices of Union producers and therefore caused material injury to the Union industry.
CCCME je trdila, da Komisija pri svoji analizi nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen ni zagotovila primerljivosti cen, ker ni upoštevala nekaterih lastnosti zadevnega izdelka.
Following final disclosure, FCI returned to this issue requesting the Commission to explain the causal link despite a divergent trend from 2014 onwards as imports from the PRC decreased (– 8 %) whereas prices for Chinese products increased (+ 1 %) and the Union industry's market share remained stable (58,8 %).
Trdila je še, da je Komisija pri določitvi stopnje dampinga upoštevala različne lastnosti izdelka.
The Commission noted that to avoid the effects of normal economic fluctuations it looks at the whole period considered in order to establish a trend.
Komisija je poudarila, da je pri primerjavi cen obravnavala glavne lastnosti izdelka v preiskavi ter zagotovila primerljivost med zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom, ki se proizvaja v Uniji, na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij.
Furthermore, even during a downward trend in Union consumption over the period considered, the imports from the PRC showed an increase in market share.
Zato je bila trditev CCCME zavrnjena.
The CCCME claimed that the Commission failed to ensure price comparability in its price undercutting analysis by not taking into account certain characteristics of the product concerned.
CCCME je trdila, da niti CCCME niti kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki niso imeli možnosti, da opredelijo razlike med kitajskimi izdelki, ki so se izvažali, in izdelki, ki so jih prodajali proizvajalci Unije, z učinkom na primerljivost cen ter zahtevajo prilagoditve za ugotovitev nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen.
It claimed further that the Commission has taken different product characteristics into account for the dumping margin determination.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom razkrila posebne izračune nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen in uporabljeno metodologijo, ter potrdila, da je na podlagi glavnih lastnosti izdelka v preiskavi zagotovila primerljivost med zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v Uniji.
The Commission stressed that it had considered the main characteristics of the product under investigation in its price comparison and has ensured comparability between the product concerned and the like product produced in the Union on the basis of the information available.
Nobenih dokazov ni bilo, da je potrebna posebna prilagoditev za razlike v fizikalnih lastnostih.
The claim from the CCCME was therefore rejected.
Po končnem razkritju je CCCME trdila, da niti sama niti kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki niso imeli možnosti, da bi pregledali izračun obsega in vrednosti prodaje vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije na PCN, ki ga je opravila Komisija, in zato niso mogli presoditi, ali so bile v zvezi s tem narejene napake.
The CCCME claimed that neither the CCCME nor the Chinese exporting producers have had the possibility to identify differences between the Chinese products exported and the products sold by the Union producers that impact price comparability and to claim adjustments for the purpose of the price undercutting determination.
Zato je CCCME trdila, da je dejanska podlaga za analizo nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen vprašljiva in ne pomeni pozitivnih dokazov.
The Commission noted that it disclosed the specific price undercutting calculations and the methodology used to the Chinese exporting producers and confirmed that on the basis of the main characteristics of the product under investigation it had ensured comparability between the product concerned and the like product produced and sold in the Union.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je v končnem razkritju CCCME pojasnila razlog, zakaj bi bilo treba ohraniti zaupnost teh podatkov.
No need for any specific adjustment for difference in physical characteristics had been demonstrated.
Zato je trditev CCCME zavrnila.
Following final disclosure, the CCCME claimed that the Chinese exporting producers and it had not had the opportunity to review the Commission's calculation of the volume and value of sales per PCN by the sampled Union producers, and thus could not assess whether mistakes had been made in this respect.
CCCME je trdila, da Komisija ni ocenila pomena nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen v zvezi z deležem domače prodaje vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, za katerega ni bilo ugotovljeno nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen, zato je izrazila dvom glede objektivnosti Komisije pri preiskavi učinka dampinškega uvoza na prodajne cene proizvajalcev Unije.
Therefore, the CCCME claimed that the factual basis for the undercutting analysis is questionable, and does not amount to positive evidence.
Po končnem razkritju je CCCME ponovila svojo trditev.
The Commission noted that in the final disclosure to the CCCME it explained the reason why this data should be kept confidential.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je dampinški uvoz vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK nelojalno nižal prodajne cene 62,6 % celotne prodaje vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije v Uniji.
It therefore rejected the claim from the CCCME.
Komisija je ugotovila tudi, da so bile vse uvožene vrste izdelka primerljive z vrstami izdelka, ki so jih prodajali vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije.
The CCCME claimed that the Commission has failed to assess the significance of the price undercutting in relation to the proportion of the domestic sales of the sampled Union producers for which no undercutting was found and therefore questioned the Commission's objectivity in its examination of the effect of the dumped imports on the sales prices of the Union producers.
Komisija je ugotovila še, da so cene uvoženih vrst izdelka nelojalno nižale prodajne cene primerljivih vrst, ki so jih prodajali vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije.
The CCCME reiterated its claim following final disclosure.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da to ustrezno dokazuje škodljive učinke kitajskih uvoznih cen na prodajo industrije Unije.
The Commission established that 62,6 % of the sampled Union producers' total sales in the Union had been undercut by the dumped imports from the sampled exporting producers from the PRC.
Po končnem razkritju je FCI ponovilo, da podatki o stopnji zaposlenosti in produktivnosti ne podpirajo ugotovitve znatne škode, ki jo je povzročil uvoz iz LRK.
The Commission found that all product types imported were comparable to product types sold by the sampled Union producers.
Poleg tega je zaradi večje učinkovitosti avtomatiziranih proizvodnih linij potrebno manjše število delovnih enot.
The Commission noted further that the prices of all product types imported had undercut the sales prices of the comparable types sold by the sampled Union producers.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je mogoče zmanjšanje zaposlenosti pripisati zmanjšanju obsega proizvodnje zaradi večjih količin dampinškega uvoza iz LRK v obravnavanem obdobju ter prizadevanjem industrije Unije, da bi se zmanjšali proizvodni stroški in povečala učinkovitost, zaradi vse večje konkurence dampinškega uvoza iz LRK.
The Commission thus concluded that this demonstrates sufficiently the injurious effects of Chinese import prices on the Union industry sales.
Zmanjšanje zaposlenosti je večje od povečanja produktivnosti, kar kaže škodo, ki jo je povzročil uvoz iz LRK.
Following final disclosure, FCI reiterated that figures on employment level and productivity do not support a finding of material injury caused by imports from the PRC.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, je Komisija potrdila svoje sklepe iz uvodnih izjav 173 in 174 začasne uredbe.
In addition, the increasing efficiency of automated production lines requires a decreasing number of working units.
Učinki drugih dejavnikov
The Commission noted that the decrease in employment can be attributed to the reduction in production volume caused by increasing quantities of dumped imports from the PRC over the period considered and the Union industry's efforts to reduce production costs and gain efficiency in view of the increasing competition from dumped imports from the PRC.
Uvoz iz tretjih držav
The decrease in employment is larger than the gain in productivity, showing injury, caused by imports from the PRC.
Kot je Komisija obravnavala v uvodnih izjavah 179 in 180 začasne uredbe, uvoz iz Indije ni prekinil vzročne zveze med dampinškim uvozom iz LRK in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in ni mogel imeti več kot majhnega učinka na škodo industrije Unije.
In the absence of any other comments, the Commission confirmed its conclusions set out in recitals (173) and (174) of the provisional Regulation.
Vendar je CCCME trdila, da bi uvoz iz Indije lahko prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz LRK in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, saj dokazne podlage za sklep Komisije, da so proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK pridobili tržni delež od industrije Unije, ni, povečanje in zmanjšanje tržnega deleža Indije oziroma Unije sta identična, obseg uvoza iz Indije se je med letom 2014 in obdobjem preiskave razvijal bolj v skladu z razvojem obsega proizvodnje in prodaje industrije Unije kot obsega uvoza iz LRK, nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen iz Indije pa je večje kot iz LRK, kar kaže, da je verjetneje, da so morebitni učinki na ceno posledica uvoza iz Indije kot uvoza iz LRK.
Effects of other factors
CCCME je trdila še, da bi morala Komisija podrobno ločiti vse različne učinke uvoza iz Indije in razlikovati med njimi ter vsakega od njih ločiti od domnevno škodljivih učinkov uvoza iz Kitajske s segmentirano analizo po državi članici ter po sivem železu, ki je indijski izdelek, in nodularnem železu, ki je kitajski izdelek.
Imports from third countries
Komisija je menila, da iz razlogov, pojasnjenih že v uvodni izjavi 199 začasne uredbe, ni potrebe po segmentirani analizi za proučitev, ali je dampinški uvoz iz LRK povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije.
As the Commission had addressed in recitals (179) and (180) of the provisional Regulation, the Indian imports did not break the causal link between the dumped imports from the PRC and the injury suffered by the Union industry, and could not have had more than a marginal impact on the injury of the Union industry.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je relativno povečanje deleža uvoza iz Indije na trgu Unije v obravnavanem obdobju nekoliko večje kot za LRK, v absolutnem smislu pa sta obseg uvoza in tržni delež Indije veliko manjša od obsega uvoza in tržnega deleža LRK v enakem obdobju in v obdobju preiskave.
However, the CCCME claimed that Indian imports might break the causal link between the dumped imports from the PRC and the injury suffered by the Union industry as there is no evidentiary basis for the Commission to conclude that exporting producers from the PRC gained market share from the Union industry, the respective increase and decrease of the Indian and Union market share is identical, the evolution from 2014 to the investigation period of the import volume from India evolved more in line with the evolution of the production and sales volume of the Union industry than the import volume from the PRC, and the price undercutting from India is higher than the price undercutting from the PRC which showed that any price effects would more likely be a result from the imports from India, rather than from the imports from the PRC.
Komisija je ugotovila, da na podlagi obsegov v absolutnem smislu ne more skleniti, da je zmanjšanje tržnega deleža industrije Unije v celoti posledica povečanja tržnega deleža uvoza iz Indije.
The CCCME claimed further that the Commission should separate and distinguish in detail all the different effects of the Indian imports, and separate each one of these from the allegedly injurious effects of Chinese imports by means of a segmented analysis by Member State and by grey iron, the Indian product, and ductile iron, the Chinese product.
Komisija je ugotovila še, da dejstva nasprotujejo trditvi CCCME v zvezi z razvojem obsegov uvoza med letom 2014 in obdobjem preiskave.
The Commission considered that for the reasons already explained in recital (199) of the provisional Regulation there is no need for a segmented analysis for the examination whether the dumped imports from the PRC caused material injury to the Union industry.
Obsega uvoza iz Indije in LRK sta se razvijala enako v primerjavi z razvojem obsega proizvodnje in prodaje industrije Unije.
The Commission noted that the relative increase of the share of the Union market held by imports from India is slightly higher than for the PRC over the period considered but in absolute terms import volumes and market share of India are much lower than import volumes and market share of the PRC over the same period and during the investigation period.
Poleg tega je Komisija priznala nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen iz Indije ter potrdila svoj sklep iz uvodne izjave 179 začasne uredbe, da razlike v povprečnih cenah ničesar ne potrjujejo, saj je za izdelke, uvožene iz Indije, in tiste iz LRK značilna različna mešanica sestavin.
The Commission noted that on the basis of absolute volumes it cannot conclude that the decrease in market share of the Union industry is entirely due to the increase in market share of Indian imports.
Po končnem razkritju je CCCME trdila, da ni imela informacij, na podlagi katerih bi lahko predložila pripombe glede razlik v cenah, ki bi kar koli potrjevale, kot je navedla Komisija, zato se s sklepom Komisije ni strinjala.
The Commission further noted that the claim of the CCCME concerning the evolution of import volumes from 2014 to the investigation period is contradicted by the facts.
Komisija je potrdila, da je ob upoštevanju razvoja obsega uvoza, tržnega deleža in cen uvoz iz Indije lahko prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Import volumes from both India and the PRC evolved in the same way as compared to the evolution of production and sales volume of the Union industry.
Vendar ni mogoče predpostavljati, da je bil uvoz iz Indije edini vzrok za poslabšanje položaja industrije Unije.
Furthermore, the Commission recognised the price undercutting from India and confirmed its conclusion in recital (179) of the provisional Regulation that average price differences are not indicative since the product mix between the imports from India and the PRC differed.
Če bi, hipotetično, učinek uvoza iz Indije izločili, bi bil uvoz iz LRK sam po sebi še vedno neodvisen vzrok škode.
Following final disclosure the CCCME claimed that it lacked the information that would allow it to comment on price differences that would be indicative according to the Commission and therefore disagreed with the Commission's conclusion.
Zlasti raven uvoza iz LRK je v obdobju preiskave veliko večja (več kot trikrat večja) kot raven uvoza iz Indije v enakem obdobju.
The Commission confirmed that when considering the evolution of import volumes, market share and prices, the Indian imports may have contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Zato je Komisija sklenila, da je verjetno, da je uvoz iz Indije lahko prispeval k znatni škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
However, it cannot be assumed that the imports from India were the only cause of the Union industry's worsening situation.
Vendar zaradi manjšega obsega in tržnega deleža ta uvoz ni prekinil vzročne zveze med škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in dampinškim uvozom iz LRK.
If, hypothetically, the effect of the imports from India were to be eliminated, the imports from the PRC would still be an independent cause of injury in their own right.
Poleg tega je Komisija ugotovila, da morebitni učinki uvoza iz Indije niso pripisani LRK, saj se pri stopnji odprave škode, izračunani za uporabo pravila nižje dajatve, upoštevajo samo učinki dampinškega uvoza iz LRK.
In particular, the level of imports from the PRC during the investigation period is much more significant (more than three times higher) than the level of imports from India during the same period.
Komisija je iz razlogov, navedenih zgoraj, potrdila svoje sklepe iz uvodnih izjav 175 do 182 začasne uredbe in s tem zavrača trditve CCCME.
Therefore, the Commission concluded that it is likely that the imports from India may have contributed to the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Izvoz industrije Unije
However, these imports did not break the causal link between the injury suffered by the Union industry and the dumped imports from the PRC because of their lower volumes and market share.
FCI je trdilo, da je na dobičkonosnost industrije Unije negativno vplival večji izvoz industrije Unije v tretje države po cenah, nižjih od proizvodnih stroškov na enoto.
Moreover, the Commission noted that any effects from the imports from India are not attributed to the PRC, as the injury elimination level calculated for the implementation of the lesser duty rule takes into account only the effects of the dumped imports from the PRC.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je izvoz v tretje države obsegal samo približno 10 % prodaje vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije v obravnavanem obdobju.
The Commission confirmed its conclusions set out in recitals (175) to (182) of the provisional Regulation for the reasons mentioned above and hereby rejects the claims made by the CCCME.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da bi lahko izvoz v tretje države le malo vplival na škodo industrije Unije v obdobju preiskave, zato ne bi mogel prekiniti vzročne zveze med dampinškim uvozom iz Kitajske in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Export performance of the Union industry
Po končnem razkritju je FCI zahtevalo, naj Komisija pojasni, kako kombinacija večjega izvoza in zelo nizkih cen ne more prekiniti vzročne zveze med domnevno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in uvozom zadevnega izdelka iz LRK.
FCI submitted that the profitability of the Union industry was negatively affected by increased exports from the Union industry to third countries at prices below their unit cost of production.
FCI je trdilo, da bi lahko industrija Unije izboljšala stopnjo dobička za 17,20 %, če svojih izdelkov ne bi prodala na trgih tretjih držav in bi namesto tega navedeni del proizvodnje prodala na domačem trgu po povprečnih cenah Unije.
The Commission noted that exports to third countries only account for approximately 10 % of the sales of the sampled Union producers over the period considered.
Komisija je ugotovila, da predpostavka FCI, da bi lahko proizvajalci Unije prodali izdelke, ki so jih izvozili, na trgu Unije po enaki ceni, kot tisti, po kateri prodajajo v Uniji, ne temelji na dokazih in je le ugibanje.
The Commission therefore concluded that the exports to third countries could only have had a marginal effect on the injurious situation of the Union industry in the investigation period, and therefore could not break the causal link between the Chinese dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Prvič, dampinški uvoz iz LRK povzroča pritisk na cene v industriji Unije.
Following final disclosure, FCI requested an explanation from the Commission on how the combination of increased exports with very low prices is not able to break the causal link between the alleged injury suffered by the Union industry and imports of the product concerned from the PRC.
Drugič, v skladu s temeljnim zakonom ekonomije o ponudbi in povpraševanju se zaradi povečanja ponudbe cena izdelka zniža.
FCI claimed that if the Union industry had not sold its products to third markets and had instead sold that part of the output domestically, at average Union prices, it could have improved its profit margin by 17,20 %.
Poleg tega je lahko mešanica sestavin izdelkov, ki jih izvažajo vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, drugačna od njihove povprečne proizvodnje in ustreznih stroškov proizvodnje.
The Commission noted that the assumption of FCI that the Union producers could sell the products they had exported on the Union market for the same price at which they sell in the Union is not based on any evidence and is a mere speculation.
Komisija je zato zavrnila trditev FCI, da bi lahko proizvajalci Unije izboljšali stopnjo dobička, če bi izdelke, ki so jih izvozili, prodali na trgu Unije.
First of all, the prices within the Union industry are under pressure because of the dumped imports from the PRC.
Upad povpraševanja
Secondly, following the fundamental economic law of supply and demand, an increase in supply will lower the price of the product.
FCI je predložilo dokaze, po katerih bi bilo treba zaprtje livarn, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 190 začasne uredbe, namesto povečanju uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz LRK pripisati drugim dejavnikom.
Moreover, the product mix of products exported by the sampled Union producers may diverge from their average production and corresponding cost of production.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so javne informacije v zvezi z ACO pokazale, da sta bila med razlogi za zaprtje livarne Unije tudi pritisk na cene in konkurenca iz LRK.
Therefore, the Commission rejected the claim of FCI that the Union producers could have improved their profit margin by selling their exports in the Union market.
FCI v zvezi z drugimi zaprtji ni predložilo prepričljivih dokazov o razlogih zanje.
Contraction in demand
V vsakem primeru ta zaprtja niso povzročila znižanja prodajnih cen in zmanjšanja dobičkonosnosti vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, saj kažejo zmanjšanje konkurenčnosti na trgu znotraj Unije.
FCI submitted evidence according to which the closure of the foundries mentioned in recital (190) of the provisional Regulation should be attributed to factors other than the increase in imports of the product concerned from the PRC.
Komisija zato to trditev zavrača ter vztraja pri mnenju, da so ta zaprtja sovpadala s škodo, ki jo je utrpela Unija, in zato ne prekinjajo vzročne zveze med dampinškim uvozom iz Kitajske in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.