natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘Works concessions contracts, when awarded by Annex 1 and 2 entities, are included under the national treatment regime for the construction service providers of Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, the Netherlands on behalf of Aruba, Switzerland, Montenegro and the United Kingdom, provided their value equals or exceeds 5000000 SDR and for the construction service providers of Korea; provided their value equals or exceeds 15000000 SDR’.
„Koncesijske pogodbe za izvajanje del so, če jih oddajo subjekti iz prilog 1 in 2, vključene v režim nacionalne obravnave ponudnikov gradbenih storitev iz Islandije, Lihtenštajna, Norveške, Nizozemske v imenu Arube, Švice, Črne gore in Združenega kraljestva, pod pogojem, da je njihova vrednost enaka ali presega 5000000 SDR, ter za ponudnike gradbenih storitev iz Koreje; pod pogojem, da je njihova vrednost enaka ali presega 15000000 SDR.“,
Footnote to the title ‘The European Union’ to Appendix I Annexes of the European Union under the revised Agreement and to the title ‘European Union’ under the 1994 Agreement shall include the following footnote:
s sprotno opombo k naslovu „Evropska unija“ v prilogah k Dodatku I Evropske unije v skladu z revidiranim sporazumom in naslovu „Evropska unija“ v skladu s sporazumom iz leta 1994 se vključi naslednja opomba:
‘All the references to the contracting authorities and contracting entities of the United Kingdom currently contained in the European Union's Appendix I Annexes are obsolete’.
„Vse navedbe javnih naročnikov in naročnikov Združenega kraljestva, ki so trenutno vključene v priloge k Dodatku I Evropske unije, so zastarele.“
Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/354
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2019/354
of 4 March 2019
z dne 4. marca 2019
On 5 March 2014 the Council adopted Decision 2014/119/CFSP.
Svet je 5. marca 2014 sprejel Sklep 2014/119/SZVP.
On the basis of a review of Decision 2014/119/CFSP, the application of restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies should be extended until 6 March 2020, the entry for one person should be deleted and the Annex should be supplemented with information regarding the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.
Na podlagi pregleda Sklepa 2014/119/SZVP bi bilo treba uporabo omejevalnih ukrepov proti določenim osebam, subjektom in organom podaljšati do 6. marca 2020, vnos za eno osebo bi bilo treba črtati in Prilogo dopolniti z informacijami o pravici do obrambe in pravici do učinkovitega sodnega varstva.
‘This Decision shall apply until 6 March 2020.’;
„Ta sklep se uporablja do 6. marca 2020.“;
Done at Brussels, 4 March 2019.
V Bruslju, 4. marca 2019
Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 26).
Sklep Sveta 2014/119/SZVP z dne 5. marca 2014 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti določenim osebam, subjektom in organom zaradi razmer v Ukrajini (UL L 66, 6.3.2014, str. 26).
The Annex to Decision 2014/119/CFSP is amended as follows:
Priloga k Sklepu 2014/119/SZVP se spremeni:
the section ‘List of persons, entities and bodies referred to in Article 1’ is amended as follows:
oddelek „Seznam oseb, subjektov in organov iz člena 1“ se spremeni:
List of persons, entities and bodies referred to in Article 1’;
Seznam oseb, subjektov in organov iz člena 1“;
the entry for the following person is deleted from the list:
s seznama se črta vnos v zvezi z naslednjo osebo:
the following section is added:
Doda se naslednji oddelek:
Rights of defence and right to effective judicial protection
Pravica do obrambe in pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva
The rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection under the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine
Pravica do obrambe in pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva na podlagi zakonika o kazenskem postopku Ukrajine
Article 42 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine (“Code of Criminal Procedure”) provides that every person who is suspected or accused in criminal proceedings enjoys rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.
Člen 42 zakonika o kazenskem postopku Ukrajine (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakonik o kazenskem postopku) določa, da ima vsaka oseba, ki je osumljena ali obdolžena v kazenskem postopku, pravico do obrambe in pravico do učinkovitega sodnega varstva.
These include: the right to be informed of the criminal offence of which he has been suspected or accused; the right to be informed, expressly and promptly, of his rights under the Code of Criminal Procedure; the right to have, when first requested, access to a defence lawyer; the right to present petitions for procedural actions; and the right to challenge decisions, actions and omissions by the investigator, the public prosecutor and the investigating judge.
Ti zajemata: pravico, da je obveščena o tem, katerega kaznivega dejanja je osumljena ali obdolžena; pravico, da je izrecno in hitro obveščena o svojih pravicah na podlagi zakonika o kazenskem postopku; pravico do dostopa do zagovornika, ko zanj prvič zaprosi; pravico do podajanja predlogov za postopkovne ukrepe in pravico, da izpodbija odločitve, dejanja in opustitve preiskovalca, javnega tožilca in preiskovalnega sodnika.
Article 306 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that complaints against decisions, acts or omissions of the investigator or public prosecutor must be considered by an investigating judge of a local Court in the presence of the complainant or his defence lawyer or legal representative.
Člen 306 zakonika o kazenskem postopku določa, da mora pritožbe zoper odločitve, dejanja ali opustitve preiskovalca ali javnega tožilca obravnavati preiskovalni sodnik okrajnega sodišča v navzočnosti pritožnika ali njegovega zagovornika ali zakonitega zastopnika.
In addition, Article 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure specifies the decisions of investigating judges that may be challenged on appeal, and that other decisions may be subject to judicial review in the course of preparatory proceedings in Court.
Poleg tega člen 309 zakonika o kazenskem postopku določa odločitve preiskovalnih sodnikov, ki jih je mogoče izpodbijati s pritožbo, in da so druge odločitve v okviru pripravljalnega postopka pred sodiščem lahko predmet sodnega nadzora.
Moreover, a number of procedural investigating actions are only possible subject to a ruling by the investigating judge or a Court (e.g. seizure of property under Article 164, and measures of detention under Article 176 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).
Številni postopkovni preiskovalni ukrepi so mogoči samo v primeru odločbe preiskovalnega sodnika ali sodišča (na primer zaseg premoženja v skladu s členom 164 in ukrepi za pridržanje v skladu s členom 176 zakonika o kazenskem postopku).
Application of the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of each of the listed persons
Uporaba pravice do obrambe in pravice do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v zvezi z vsako od oseb s seznama
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Yanukovych were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica O. V. Yanukovycha do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated in particular by a number of Court decisions relating to the seizure of property and by a Court decision of 1 November 2018 granting permission for the arrest and summoning and bringing of the suspected to the Court, as well as by a decision of the investigating judge of 8 October 2018 refusing the prosecutor's application for a special pre-trial investigation in absentia.
To dokazujejo predvsem številne odločitve sodišča v zvezi z zasegom premoženja in odločitev sodišča z dne 1. novembra 2018, s katero je bilo izdano dovoljenje, da se osumljenca prime ter ga povabi in privede pred sodišče, pa tudi odločitev preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 8. oktobra 2018, s katero je bila zavrnjena prošnja tožilca za posebno predsodno preiskavo v nenavzočnosti.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Zakharchenko were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica V. Y Zakharchenka do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated in particular by the decisions of the investigating judge of 21 May 2018 and of 23 November 2018 granting permission to detain Mr Zakharchenko with the purpose of bringing him to the Court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody.
To dokazujeta predvsem odločitvi preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 21. maja 2018 in 23. novembra 2018, s katerima je bilo izdano dovoljenje, da se V. Y Zakharchenka pridrži, da bi se ga za udeležbo na obravnavi glede predloga za odreditev pripora privedlo pred sodišče.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Pshonka were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica A. V. Pshonke do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated in particular by the decisions of the investigating judge of 12 March 2018 and of 13 August 2018 granting permission to detain Mr Pshonka with the purpose of bringing him to the Court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody.
To dokazujeta predvsem odločitvi preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 12. marca 2018 in 13. avgusta 2018, s katerima je bilo izdano dovoljenje, da se V. P. Pshonko pridrži, da bi se ga za udeležbo na obravnavi glede predloga za odreditev pripora privedlo pred sodišče.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Ratushniak were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica V. I. Ratushniaka do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated in particular by the decisions of the investigating judge of 21 May 2018 and of 23 November 2018 granting permission to detain Mr Ratushniak with the purpose of bringing him to the Court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody.
To dokazujeta predvsem odločitvi preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 21. maja 2018 in 23. novembra 2018, s katerima je bilo izdano dovoljenje, da se V. I Ratushniaka pridrži, da bi se ga za udeležbo na obravnavi glede predloga za odreditev pripora privedlo pred sodišče.
This is demonstrated in particular by the decision of the investigating judge of 7 February 2018 refusing the prosecutor's application for a special pre-trial investigation in absentia, by a number Court decisions relating to the seizures of property and by the decision of the investigating judge of 27 June 2018 cancelling the resolution of the prosecution refusing to grant the motion of defence for closing the investigation.
To dokazuje predvsem odločitev preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 7. februarja 2018, s katero je bila zavrnjena prošnja tožilca za posebno predsodno preiskavo v nenavzočnosti, številne odločitve sodišča v zvezi z zasegom premoženja in odločitev preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 27. junija 2018, s katero je bila preklicana resolucija tožilstva o zavrnitvi predloga obrambe za zaključek preiskave.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence of and the right to effective judicial protection Mr Azarov were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica M. Y. Azarova do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated in particular by the decision of the investigating judge of 8 September 2018 granting permission for a special investigation in absentia as well as by the decision of the investigating judge of 16 August 2018 granting permission to detain Mr Azarov with the purpose of bringing him to the Court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody, as well as by a number of Court decisions relating to the seizures of property.
To dokazuje predvsem odločitev preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 8. septembra 2018, s katero je bilo izdano dovoljenje za posebno preiskavo v nenavzočnosti in odločitev preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 16. avgusta 2018, s katero je bilo izdano dovoljenje, da se M. Y. Azarova pridrži, da bi se ga za udeležbo na obravnavi glede predloga za odreditev pripora privedlo pred sodišče, pa tudi številne odločitve sodišča v zvezi z zasegom premoženja.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Kurchenko were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica S. V. Kurchenka do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated in particular by the decision of the investigating judge of 7 March 2018 granting permission for a special investigation in absentia.
To dokazuje predvsem odločitev preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 7. marca 2018, s katero je bilo izdano dovoljenje za posebno preiskavo v nenavzočnosti.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Tabachnyk were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica D. V. Tabachnyka do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated in particular by the decisions of the investigating judge of 8 May 2018 granting permission to detain Mr Tabachnyk with the purpose of bringing him to the Court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody.
To dokazuje predvsem odločitev preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 8. maja 2018, s katero je bilo izdano dovoljenje, da se D. V. Tabachnyka pridrži, da bi se ga za udeležbo na obravnavi glede predloga za odreditev pripora privedlo pred sodišče.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Arbuzov were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica S. H Arbuzova do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated in particular by a number of Court decisions relating to the seizures of property as well as annulment of the property seizures.
To dokazujejo predvsem številne odločitve sodišča v zvezi z zasegom premoženja in razveljavitve zasega premoženja.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Klymenko were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica O. V. Klymenka do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated in particular by the decision of the investigating judge of 5 October 2018 granting permission for a special investigation in absentia.
To dokazuje predvsem odločitev preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 5. oktobra 2018, s katero je bilo izdano dovoljenje za posebno preiskavo v nenavzočnosti.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Stavytskyi were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Iz podatkov v dokumentaciji Sveta je razvidno, da sta bili pravica E. Stavytskega do obrambe in njegova pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva v kazenskem postopku, na katerega se je oprl Svet, spoštovani.
This is demonstrated by a number of Court decisions relating to the seizure of property, the decision of the investigating judge of 22 November 2017 granting permission for a special investigation in absentia, by the prosecutor's instructions of 2 January 2018 to the investigator to notify the suspects and their defence lawyers of the completion of the pre-trial investigation and by the fact that on 8 May 2018 the indictment was referred to the Sviatoshynskyi District Court of Kiev for consideration on the merits.
To dokazujejo predvsem številne odločitve sodišča v zvezi z zasegom premoženja, odločitev preiskovalnega sodnika z dne 22. novembra 2017, s katero je bilo izdano dovoljenje za posebno preiskavo v nenavzočnosti, navodila tožilca preiskovalcu z dne 2. januarja 2018, naj osumljence in njihove zagovornike obvesti o zaključku predsodne preiskave, ter dejstvo, da je bila obtožnica 8. maja 2018 posredovana okrožnemu sodišču Sviatoshynskyi v Kijevu za presojo utemeljenosti.
The information also shows that there was no previous valid decision of the prosecution not to launch a criminal investigation, and that the relevant criminal proceedings therefore did not infringe the principle of ne bis in idem.’
Informacije tudi kažejo na to, da ni bilo predhodne odločitve tožilstva o tem, da ne bodo začeli kazenske preiskave, in da zato v zadevnem kazenskem postopku ni bilo kršeno načelo ne bis in idem.“
Commission Decision (EU) 2019/367
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2019/367
on the measure SA.35065 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN, 2012/FC) implemented by the United Kingdom for MMD Shipping Services Ltd
o ukrepu SA.35065 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN, 2012/FC), ki ga je Združeno kraljestvo izvedlo v korist družbe MMD Shipping Services Ltd.
(notified under document C(2018) 7360)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2018) 7360)
On 10 April 2013, the Commission received a complaint alleging unlawful aid provided by Portsmouth City Council (‘PCC’) to MMD Shipping Services Ltd (‘MMD’).
Komisija je 10. aprila 2013 prejela pritožbo o nezakoniti pomoči, ki naj bi jo mestni svet Portsmouth (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PCC) zagotovil družbi MMD Shipping Services Ltd. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba MMD).
The submission of a formal complaint was preceded by an informal submission by the complainant of 8 June 2012 and a meeting of 29 November 2012.
Preden je pritožnik vložil uradno pritožbo, je 8. junija 2012 vložil neuradno pritožbo, 29. novembra 2012 pa se je udeležil sestanka.
The United Kingdom provided their comments on 1 July 2013.
Komisija se je 10. aprila 2014 sestala s pritožnikom, 16. aprila 2014 pa mu je poslala nezaupno različico stališč Združenega kraljestva, da bi nanje podal pripombe.
On 10 October 2013, the Commission sent a request for additional detailed information about the measures alleged.
Pritožnik je pripombe predložil 12. novembra 2014.
The United Kingdom replied on 25 November 2013 and 9 December 2013.
Z dopisom z dne 19. septembra 2016 je Komisija Združeno kraljestvo uradno obvestila o svoji odločitvi, da začne postopek na podlagi člena 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije v zvezi z ukrepom.
The Commission met with the complainant on 10 April 2014, and, on 16 April 2014 sent a non-confidential version of the United Kingdom submissions to the complainant for their comments.
Z dopisom z dne 21. novembra 2016 je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo pripombe v zvezi z odločitvijo Komisije, da začne postopek.
The complainant provided comments on 12 November 2014.
Odločitev Komisije, da začne postopek (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka), je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
By letter dated 19 September 2016, the Commission notified the United Kingdom of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of the measure.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi z ukrepi.
The United Kingdom provided observations on the Commission decision to initiate the procedure by letter dated 21 November 2016.
Komisija je prejela pripombe dveh zainteresiranih strani, in sicer pritožnika in anonimne zainteresirane strani.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure (‘the Opening Decision’) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Dne 21. januarja 2017 jih je posredovala Združenemu kraljestvu in mu zagotovila možnost odgovora.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures.
Njegove pripombe je prejela z dopisom z dne 15. februarja 2017.
The Commission received comments from two interested parties the complainant and an Anonymous Interested Party.
Komisija se je 26. aprila 2017 sestala z Združenim kraljestvom.
It forwarded them to the United Kingdom on 21 January 2017, and the United Kingdom was given the opportunity to respond.
Združeno kraljestvo je po tem sestanku z dopisom z dne 12. januarja 2018 predložilo dodatne informacije.
Comments were received from the United Kingdom by letter dated 15 February 2017.
Med Komisijo in Združenim kraljestvom je 18. aprila 2018 potekala telefonska konferenca, po kateri je Združeno kraljestvo z dopisoma z dne 5. junija in 22. junija 2018 predložilo dodatne informacije.
On 26 April 2017, the Commission held a meeting with the United Kingdom.
PODROBEN OPIS UKREPA
Following this meeting, the United Kingdom submitted additional information by letter dated 12 January 2018.
Prejemnik
On 18 April 2018, the Commission held a telephone conference with the United Kingdom, following which the United Kingdom submitted additional information by letters dated 5 June and 22 June 2018.
Družba MMD je od leta 2008 hčerinska družba v 100-odstotni lasti PCC in zagotavlja storitve pretovarjanja (prekladanje, skladiščenje in distribucija zlasti sadja in drugih svežih proizvodov) strankam v mednarodnem pristanišču v Portsmouthu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pristanišče), katerega lastnik in upravljavec je PCC.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE
Družba MMD je glavni operater v pristanišču, kjer opravlja storitve pretovarjanja in ima v dolgoročnem zakupu glavne pristane za pretovarjanje.
Recipient
Druge dejavnosti pristanišča so povezane s storitvami trajektov ro-ro in ladjami za križarjenje.
As of 2008 MMD is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PCC and provides cargo-handling services (stevedoring, warehousing and distribution of mainly fruit and other fresh produce) to customers at Portsmouth International Port (‘the Port’), which is also owned and operated by PCC.
Letni promet družbe MMD znaša približno 15 milijonov GBP, družba pa zaposluje skoraj 200 ljudi.
MMD is the principal cargo handling operator in the Port with a long-term lease for the main cargo handling quays.
Preden je družbo MMD pridobil PCC, je vsaj od proračunskega leta 2002/2003 ustvarjala izgubo.
Other operations of the Port relate to roll-on, roll-off ferry services and cruise ships.
Domnevni ukrepi državne pomoči, ki jih je navedel pritožnik
Prior to PCC's acquisition of MMD, MMD had been loss-making at least since the 2002/2003 financial year.
Med domnevnimi ukrepi pomoči so:
Following its acquisition by PCC in 2008, the financial results of MMD were largely balanced thanks to the annual revenue grants provided by PCC, and without which MMD would have recorded an operating loss between 2008 and 2016.
ukrep 1: pridobitev družbe MMD s strani PCC leta 2008 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep 1),
The financial year 2016/2017 was the first year that MMD recorded a profit without any revenue grant from PCC (see Table 1).
ukrep 2: letna nepovratna sredstva PCC za prihodek družbe MMD (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep 2),