natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The amount of dumping was first calculated for each individual exporting producer and then a weighted average of the individual dumping margins was established at the level of the Interpipe group.
Na podlagi tega je bilo s preiskavo za oba proizvajalca izvoznika ugotovljeno, da je bila prodaja podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu reprezentativna.
In view of the significant exports to the Union by Interpipe Group during the review investigation period, the analysis of continuation of dumping during that period was primarily based on the verified data provided by Interpipe Group.
Komisija je nato opredelila, katere vrste izdelka skupine Interpipe, ki se prodajajo na domačem trgu, so enake ali primerljive z vrstami, izvoženimi v Unijo.
The Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales for each cooperating exporting producer was representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato za skupino Interpipe proučila, ali je domača prodaja vseh vrst izdelka, ki so enake ali primerljive z vrsto izdelka, ki se izvaža, reprezentativna v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
The domestic sales are representative if the total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers on the domestic market per exporting producer represents at least 5 % of total export sales volume of the product concerned to the Union during the review investigation period.
Domača prodaja vrste izdelka je reprezentativna, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje te vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza enake ali podobne vrste izdelka.
On this basis, the examination established that the sales of the like product on the domestic market were representative for both exporting producers.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bila za večino vrst izdelka domača prodaja reprezentativna.
The Commission subsequently identified the product types sold domestically that were identical or comparable with the product types sold for export by Interpipe Group.
Komisija je nato določila delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu za vsako vrsto izdelka v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, da bi se odločila, ali bo za izračun normalne vrednosti uporabila dejansko domačo prodajo v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission then examined whether the domestic sales of Interpipe Group for each product type that is identical or comparable with a product type sold for export were representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je bila določena na podlagi dejanske domače cene za posamezno vrsto izdelka, ne glede na to, ali je bila navedena prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne:
The domestic sales of a product type are representative if the total volume of domestic sales of that product type to independent customers during the review investigation period constituted at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the identical or comparable product type.
če je obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, enaki izračunanim proizvodnim stroškom ali višji od njih, zajemal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka in
The Commission established that for the majority of product types domestic sales were made in representative quantities.
če je tehtana povprečna prodajna cena navedene vrste izdelka enaka proizvodnim stroškom na enoto ali višja od njih.
The Commission subsequently defined the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market for each product type during the review investigation period in order to decide whether to use actual domestic sales for the calculation of the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
V tem primeru je normalna vrednost tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje navedene vrste izdelka v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
The normal value was based on the actual domestic price per product type, irrespective of whether those sales are profitable or not, if:
Normalna vrednost je bila določena na podlagi dejanske domače cene za posamezno vrsto izdelka, in sicer izključno pri dobičkonosni domači prodaji te vrste izdelka v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom:
the sales volume of the product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of this product type; and
če obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka predstavlja 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka ali
the weighted average sales price of that product type is equal to or higher than the unit cost of production.
če je tehtana povprečna cena te vrste izdelka nižja od proizvodnih stroškov na enoto.
In the case at hand, the normal value is the weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that product type during the review investigation period.
Če ni bilo prodaje določene vrste podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine ali če določena vrsta izdelka ni bila prodana v reprezentativnih količinah na domačem trgu, je Komisija konstruirala normalno vrednost v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
The normal value was based on the actual domestic price per product type of only the profitable domestic sales of the product types during the review investigation period, if:
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da se je povprečnim stroškom proizvodnje podobnega izdelka vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom prištelo naslednje:
the volume of profitable sales of the product type represents 80 % or less of the total sales volume of this type; or
tehtano povprečje prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PSA-stroški) vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki so v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom nastali pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine, in
the weighted average price of this product type is below the unit cost of production.
tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki ga je dosegel vsak sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
When there were no sales of a product type of the like product in the ordinary course of trade, or where a product type was not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market, the Commission constructed the normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Skupina Interpipe je po dokončnem razkritju oporekala nekaterim elementom, ki jih je Komisija uporabila za izračun normalne vrednosti.
Normal value was constructed by adding the following to the average cost of production of the like product of each cooperating exporting producer during the review investigation period:
Trditve so se nanašale na naslednje elemente: (i) izračunom PSA-stroškov med povezanimi družbami; (ii) uporabo finančnih stroškov, ki izhajajo iz [zaupno]; (iii) pozitivno in negativno tečajno razliko, ki izhaja iz [zaupno]; (iv) nekaterimi stroški kredita, ki bi jih bilo treba upoštevati.
the weighted average selling, general and administrative (‘SG&A’) expenses incurred by each cooperating exporting producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the review investigation period, and
V zvezi s prvim elementom je Komisija skupino Interpipe v drugem dodatnem razkritju obvestila o tem, kakšen bi bil v primeru sprejetja trditve vpliv na stopnjo dampinga in poznejše ugotovitve.
the weighted average profit realised by each cooperating exporting producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the review investigation period.
Komisija je v zvezi s tem predložila tudi začasen izračun, ki je temeljil na istem pristopu kot v prejšnjem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa.
Following final disclosure, Interpipe Group contested some of the elements used by the Commission in the calculation of the normal value.
Komisija je na podlagi analize vseh elementov sprejela trditev skupine Interpipe v zvezi s to točko, zato se je stopnja dampinga ustrezno znižala (glej uvodno izjavo 90).
The claims pertained to the following issues: (i) calculation of SG&A between related companies; (ii) use of financial costs stemming from [confidential]; (iii) foreign exchange gains/losses stemming from [confidential]; (iv) certain credit costs should be taken into account.
Komisija je trditvi (ii) in (iii) zavrnila.
With regard to the first element, the Commission informed Interpipe Group, in the second additional disclosure, of what would be the impact on the dumping margin and the subsequent findings if the claim was accepted.
Komisija je zaradi zaupne narave podatkov, vključenih v analizo, skupini Interpipe na dan objave te uredbe zagotovila individualno pojasnilo.
The Commission also provided a provisional calculation to this effect, following the same approach as in the previous expiry review.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da bi bilo treba pri izračunu dampinga upoštevati stroške kredita, je Komisija trdila (kot je pojasnjeno v posebnem razkritju z dne 13. julija 2018), da ji družba ni predložila zahtevanih dokazov, s katerimi bi podprla svojo trditev.
Following the analysis of all the elements, the Commission accepted the claim of Interpipe Group regarding this item and hence the dumping margin was reduced accordingly (see recital (90) below).
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
The Commission rejected the arguments (ii) and (iii).
Proizvajalci izvozniki so zadevni izdelek izvažali neodvisnim strankam v Uniji prek več povezanih družb, ki so delovale kot trgovci in/ali uvozniki.
Due to the confidential nature of the data involved in the analysis, the Commission provided Interpipe with an individual explanation on the day of publication of this Regulation.
Če je proizvajalec izvoznik zadevni izdelek izvozil neodvisnim strankam v Uniji prek povezane družbe, ki je delovala kot trgovka (Interpipe Europe SA), je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi plačanih ali plačljivih cen za zadevni izdelek, ko je bil prodan za izvoz v Unijo.
With regard to the claim that credit costs should have been taken into account in the dumping calculation, the Commission maintained (as it explained in the specific disclosure of 13 July 2018) that the company had failed to provide the Commission with the requested evidence in support of their claim.
Če je proizvajalec izvoznik zadevni izdelek izvažal v Unijo prek povezane družbe, ki je delovala kot uvoznica (Interpipe Central Trade GmbH), je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe konstruirana na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek prvič nadalje prodan neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
Therefore this claim was rejected.
Izvozna cena je bila v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe prilagojena za transakcije v zvezi s povezanim uvoznikom v Nemčiji.
The exporting producers exported the product concerned to independent customers in the Union through a number of related companies acting as traders and/or importers.
Prodajna cena povezanega uvoznika za nepovezane stranke je bila prilagojena nazaj na ceno franko tovarna, tako da so se odšteli PSA-stroški povezanega uvoznika, razumni delež dobička in drugi popravki, kjer je primerno.
When the exporting producer exported the product concerned to independent customers in the Union through a related company acting as a trader (Interpipe Europe SA), the export price was established on the basis of prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Skupina Interpipe je po dokončnem razkritju trdila, da bi bilo treba zaradi odstopanj med izračunom in opisno razlago v dokončnem razkritju, povezanem z družbo, pregledati ceno CIF družbe Interpipe Europe.
When the exporting producers exported the product concerned to the Union through a related company acting as an importer (Interpipe Central Trade GmbH), the export price was constructed on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je dejansko ugotovila, da se v opisnem delu razkritja, povezanega z družbo, ni ustrezno upošteval dejanski način izračuna cene CIF.
Adjustments to the export price pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation were carried out on the transactions concerning the related importer in Germany.
Komisija je zato opis v razkritju, povezanem z družbo, popravila in potrdila, da je bil izračun izveden na podlagi ugotovitev, o katerih je z družbo razpravljala na preveritvenem obisku.
The sales price by the related importer to unrelated customers was adjusted backwards to an ex-works price by deducting the SG&A of the related importer, a reasonable amount of profit and other allowances whenever applicable.
Izvozne cene skupine Interpipe v Unijo so bile primerjane z normalno vrednostjo njene domače prodaje na ravni franko tovarna.
Following final disclosure Interpipe Group claimed that the CIF price of Interpipe Europe should be reviewed due to a discrepancy between the calculation and the narrative explanation in the company specific final disclosure.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevale razlike, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cen.
Indeed, the Commission observed that the narrative part of the specific disclosure was not properly reflecting the way that the CIF calculation had been actually carried out.
V zvezi s tem so bili odšteti popravki za stroške prevoza in provizije, ki vplivajo na normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno.
The Commission therefore corrected the narrative of the specific disclosure and confirmed that the calculation had been done on the basis of the findings as discussed with the company during the verification visit.
Na podlagi navedenega je stopnja dampinga, ki je bila ugotovljena za skupino Interpipe v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, znaša 21,6 %.
Interpipe Group's export prices to the Union were compared with the normal value of its domestic sales at ex-works level.
Ker je skupina Interpipe največja ukrajinska proizvajalka in je v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom predstavljala večino uvoza iz Ukrajine, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 71, je Komisija sklenila, da je damping, ugotovljen za družbo Interpipe, reprezentativen za Ukrajino na ravni države.
In order to ensure a fair comparison, account was taken of differences which affect price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je torej ugotovila, da se je damping iz Ukrajine v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom nadaljeval.
In this respect, allowances for transport costs and commissions affecting normal value and export price were deducted.
Verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov
On the basis of the above, the dumping margin found for the Interpipe Group during the review investigation period amounted to 21,6 %.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno zgoraj, je Ukrajina v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom nadaljevala z dampingom.
Given that Interpipe Group is the largest Ukrainian producer and that it represented most of the imports from Ukraine in the review investigation period, as explained in recital (71), the Commission concluded that the dumping found for Interpipe Group was representative for Ukraine at a country-wide level.
Uvoz iz Ukrajine je dosegel 80711 ton v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, kar je predstavljalo 6 % tržnega deleža v Uniji.
The Commission thus established that dumping from Ukraine had continued in the review investigation period.
Poleg teh ugotovitev je Komisija analizirala, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping nadaljeval, če bi se dovolil iztek sedanjih protidampinških ukrepov.
Likelihood of continuation of dumping should measures be repealed
Pri tem je obravnavala proizvodnjo in neizkoriščeno zmogljivost v Ukrajini, privlačnost trga Unije in ravnanje ukrajinskih izvoznikov na drugih trgih.
As established above, Ukraine was found to continue dumping in the review investigation period.
Neizkoriščena zmogljivost je bila izračunana na naslednji način.
Imports from Ukraine reached 80711 tonnes in the review investigation period, representing 6 % market share in the Union market.
Kar zadeva skupino Interpipe, bi se lahko neizkoriščena zmogljivost določila na podlagi sporočenih in ustrezno preverjenih podatkov.
Further to these findings, the Commission analysed whether dumping from Ukraine was likely to continue if the anti-dumping measures in place were allowed to lapse.
Druga dva proizvajalca zadevnega izdelka v Ukrajini vprašalnika nista izpolnila.
When doing so, it looked into production and spare capacity in Ukraine, the attractiveness of the Union market and the behaviour of Ukrainian exporters in other markets.
V pisnih stališčih sta predložila le nekatere informacije o proizvodnji in proizvodni zmogljivosti.
Spare capacity was calculated as follows.
Te informacije so bile analizirane in primerjane z viri tržnih podatkov, zlasti s podatki spletišča Metal Expert.
As concerns Interpipe Group, the spare capacity could be established on the basis of the reported and duly verified data.
Glede na navedeno je bila neizkoriščena zmogljivost Ukrajine ocenjena na vsaj približno 500000 ton, kar predstavlja približno 40 % potrošnje Unije.
The other two producers of the product concerned in Ukraine did not reply to the questionnaire.
Skupina Interpipe je po dokončnem razkritju oporekala zgoraj navedenemu podatku Komisije o neizkoriščeni zmogljivosti, pri čemer je sprva trdila, da bi morala neizkoriščena zmogljivost znašati [80000–100000 ton].
They only provided certain information on their production and production capacity in written submissions.
Komisija je na podlagi prejetih pripomb predložila podrobno razlago in pojasnila v okviru prvega dodatnega razkritja skupini Interpipe, na zaslišanju z družbo in v okviru drugega dodatnega razkritja skupini Interpipe.
That information was analysed and compared with market intelligence sources, in particular Metal Expert.
Skupina Interpipe je v svojih pripombah k prvemu dodatnemu razkritju in na zaslišanju potrdila, da se strinja z neizkoriščeno zmogljivostjo, ki jo je zanjo izračunala Komisija in je bila znatno večja od neizkoriščene zmogljivosti, ki jo je omenila v svojih pripombah k dokončnemu razkritju.
Accordingly, for Ukraine, the spare capacity available was estimated to be, at least, around 500000 tonnes, which represents around 40 % of Union consumption.
Kljub temu je še naprej oporekala izračunu zmogljivosti, kar zadeva druga dva proizvajalca iz Ukrajine.
Following final disclosure, Interpipe Group contested the Commission's spare capacity figure mentioned above, initially claiming that it should amount to [80000-100000 tonnes].
V zvezi s tem je Komisija skupino Interpipe opozorila na dejstvo, da nobena od teh dveh družb ni v celoti sodelovala s Komisijo, saj sta predložili le nekatere informacije, povezane s proizvodnjo in/ali proizvodno zmogljivostjo.
Following the comments received, the Commission provided detailed explanations and clarifications in its first additional disclosure to the Interpipe Group, at the hearing with the company and also in the second additional disclosure to the Interpipe Group.
Opozorila je tudi, da je Komisija informacije, ki sta jih predložili ti strani, kljub temu in v nasprotju s trditvami skupine Interpipe upoštevala v svoji analizi.
In its comments to the first additional disclosure and at the hearing, the Interpipe Group confirmed that it agreed with the spare capacity calculated by the Commission as far as the Interpipe Group was concerned, which was a significantly higher figure than the figure mentioned in its comments to the final disclosure.
Dejansko je Komisija navzkrižno preverila informacije, ki so bili predloženi v teh stališčih, z javno dostopnimi podatki na spletišču Metal Expert.
Nevertheless, the Interpipe Group continued to contest the capacity calculation with regard to the other two Ukrainian producers.
Podatki s spletišča Metal Expert so bili za eno od teh strani skladni s trditvijo družbe, da se je proizvodna zmogljivost v obravnavanem obdobju zelo zmanjšala.
In this respect, the Commission reminded the Interpipe Group of the fact that none of the two companies had fully cooperated with the Commission as they had only submitted certain information pertaining to production and/or production capacity.
Za izračun njene neizkoriščene zmogljivosti se je Komisija zato opirala na zmanjšano proizvodno zmogljivost, kot je bilo sporočeno na spletišču Metal Expert.
It was also recalled that the information provided by these parties was nevertheless, and contrary to what the Interpipe Group claimed, taken into consideration by the Commission in its analysis.
Kljub temu je skupina Interpipe po tem dodatnem razkritju še naprej oporekala tako pridobljenemu podatku o neizkoriščeni zmogljivosti.
In fact, the Commission cross-checked the information provided in these submissions with publicly available data from Metal Expert.
Komisija je zavrnila to trditev iz naslednjih razlogov.
For one of these parties, Metal Expert data could be reconciled with the company's claim that there had been a massive reduction in the production capacity over the period considered.
Zadevna družba v svojem stališču ni predložila podatkov v zvezi s proizvodno zmogljivostjo.
For calculating its spare capacity, the Commission thus relied on the reduced production capacity as reported in Metal Expert.
Navedla je le, da se je število zaposlenih zmanjšalo (60–75-odstotno zmanjšanje delovne sile) in da je proizvodnja znašala [4000–10000] milijonov ton na leto.
Nevertheless, after this additional disclosure, the Interpipe Group continued to contest the spare capacity figure thus established.
Poleg tega skupina Interpipe v svojih pripombah po dodatnem razkritju ni predložila ocene proizvodne zmogljivosti zadevne družbe.
The Commission rejected this claim for the following reasons:
Zato iz stališč skupine Interpipe in zadevne družbe sledi, da Komisija sploh ni prejela izhodišča za oceno proizvodnje in prostih zmogljivosti za to družbo.
The company concerned, in its own submission, did not provide any figure regarding production capacity.
Komisija je kljub temu sklenila, da trditev zadevne družbe potrjujejo javno dostopni podatki, saj so podatki o proizvodni zmogljivosti s spletišča Metal Expert upoštevali zmanjšano proizvodno zmogljivost te družbe.
It only noted that ‘employment went down (reduction of between 60 % and 75 % in the workforce) and that the production amounted to [4000-10000] MT per year.
Komisija se je zato odločila, da bo svojo neizkoriščeno zmogljivost izračunala na podlagi podatkov o proizvodnji, ki jih je predložila zadevna družba, in podatkov o proizvodni zmogljivosti, ki so bili sporočeni na spletišču Metal Expert.
In addition, in its comments after the additional disclosure, Interpipe Group did not provide any estimation whatsoever of the production capacity of the company concerned.
Komisija je torej sprejela trditev, da je družba zelo zmanjšala svojo proizvodno zmogljivost.
Therefore, it follows from the submissions of Interpipe Group as well as of the company concerned that the Commission was not even given a starting point to assess the production and spare capacity for this company.
Trditev skupine Interpipe je torej neutemeljena.
The Commission nevertheless concluded that the claim of the company concerned was corroborated by publicly available data as the reduced production capacity was reflected in the Metal Expert production capacity figure for it.
Kar zadeva tretjega proizvajalca, je Komisija ugotovila znatna odstopanja med podatki, ki jih je predložila družba, in javno dostopnimi podatki.
The Commission hence decided to calculate its spare capacity on the basis of the production data provided by the company concerned and the production capacity data reported in Metal Expert.
Tako se je Komisija oprla na proizvodno zmogljivost, kot je navedena na spletišču Metal Expert, za izračun svoje proste zmogljivosti.