natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Competent authorities and resolution authorities shall assess the impact of the failure of a credit institution on financial markets, on other institutions or on funding conditions on the basis of a total quantitative score calculated in accordance with Annex I. They shall do so on a regular basis and at least every two years.
Pristojni organi in organi za reševanje lahko zvišajo ali znižajo prag iz odstavka 2 v razponu od 0 do 105 bazičnih točk.
A credit institution with a total quantitative score equal to or higher than 25 basis points shall be regarded as an institution the failure of which would be likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions.
Pristojni organi in organi za reševanje spremenjeni prag redno pregledujejo.
Competent and resolution authorities may raise or lower the threshold referred to in paragraph 2 within the range of 0 to 105 basis points.
Če vrednosti kazalnikov iz Priloge I niso na voljo, se ocena iz odstavka 1 izvede na podlagi približkov, ki so v največji možni meri v korelaciji s kazalniki, kakor so določeni v Prilogi III.
Competent and resolution authorities shall keep the amended threshold under regular review.
Če kreditna institucija ne presega praga, določenega v členu 5(a)(4) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 680/2014, in ne predloži predloge 20 navedene uredbe, lahko pristojni organi in organi za reševanje zadevnim kazalnikom, določenim v Prilogi III, dodelijo vrednost nič.
Where the indicator values of Annex I are not available, the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made on the basis of proxies correlated to the greatest extent possible with the indicators as specified in Annex III.
Kadar skupna sredstva kreditne institucije ne presegajo 0,02 % skupnih sredstev vseh kreditnih institucij, ki imajo dovoljenje, in podružnic, ustanovljenih v državi članici, vključno s podružnicami v Uniji, kadar so na voljo ustrezni podatki, lahko pristojni organi in organi za reševanje, ne da bi uporabili odstavke 1 do 5, ugotovijo, da propad navedene kreditne institucije verjetno ne bi imel znatnega negativnega učinka na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja, razen če to ne bi bilo upravičeno na podlagi člena 2.
Where a credit institution does not exceed the threshold specified in Article 5(a)(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 and does not submit Template 20 of that Regulation, competent and resolution authorities may assign a value of zero to the relevant indicators specified in Annex III.
Če je bila kreditna institucija v skladu s členom 131(1) Direktive 2013/36/EU opredeljena kot GSPI ali DSPI ali na podlagi smernic o skupnih postopkih in metodologijah za proces nadzorniškega pregledovanja in ovrednotenja, izdanih v skladu s členom 107(3) navedene direktive, razvrščena kot kategorija 1, lahko pristojni organi in organi za reševanje, ne da bi uporabili odstavke 1 do 5 tega člena, ugotovijo, da bi imel propad navedene kreditne institucije verjetno znaten negativen učinek na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja.
Where the total assets of a credit institution do not exceed 0,02 % of the total assets of all credit institutions authorised and, where relevant data are available, of branches established in the Member State, including Union branches, competent and resolution authorities may, without applying paragraphs 1 to 5, establish that the failure of that credit institution would not be likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions, unless that would not be justified on the basis of Article 2.
Zadevne vrednosti kazalnikov za navedene institucije se v vsakem primeru še vedno upoštevajo za določanje skupnega zneska iz točke 2 Priloge I in skupnih sredstev vseh kreditnih institucij, ki so pridobile dovoljenje v državi članici za namen odstavka 6.
Where a credit institution has been identified as a G-SII or an O-SII under Article 131(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU or classified as Category 1 on the basis of the guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) issued in accordance with Article 107(3) of that Directive, competent and resolution authorities may, without applying paragraphs 1 to 5 of this Article, establish that the failure of that credit institution would be likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions.
Člen 2
The relevant indicator values for those institutions shall, in any event, still be taken into account for determining the aggregate amount referred to in point 2 of Annex I, and for determining the total assets of all credit institutions authorised in the Member State for the purpose of paragraph 6.
Kvalitativna ocena za kreditne institucije
Article 2
Če se kreditna institucija v skladu s členom 1 ne šteje za institucijo, katere propad bi verjetno imel znaten negativen učinek na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja, pristojni organi in organi za reševanje redno in vsaj vsaki dve leti ocenijo učinek propada kreditne institucije na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja ter pri tem upoštevajo vsaj naslednje kvalitativne vidike:
Qualitative assessment for credit institutions
obseg, v katerem kreditna institucija opravlja kritične funkcije v eni ali več državah članicah;
Where, pursuant to Article 1, a credit institution is not regarded as an institution the failure of which would be likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, on other institutions or on funding conditions, competent and resolution authorities shall assess the impact of that credit institution's failure on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions on a regular basis and at least every two years and having regard to, at least, all of the following qualitative considerations:
ali bi krite vloge kreditne institucije presegle razpoložljiva finančna sredstva zadevnega sistema jamstva za vloge in zmožnost sistema jamstva za vloge, da zbere izredne naknadne prispevke, kot je navedeno v členu 10 Direktive 2014/49/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta;
the extent to which the credit institution performs critical functions in one or more Member States;
ali je delniška struktura kreditne institucije zelo koncentrirana, zelo razpršena ali pa ni dovolj pregledna na način, ki bi lahko negativno vplival na razpoložljivost ali pravočasno izvedbo ukrepov institucije za sanacijo ali reševanje;
whether the credit institution's covered deposits would exceed the available financial means of the relevant deposit guarantee scheme and the deposit guarantee scheme's capacity to raise extraordinary ex post contributions, as referred to in Article 10 of Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council;
ali kreditna institucija, ki je članica institucionalne sheme za zaščito vlog, kot je navedena v členu 113(7) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, drugim članom institucionalne sheme za zaščito vlog zagotavlja kritične funkcije, vključno s klirinškimi, zakladniškimi ali drugimi storitvami;
whether the credit institution's shareholding structure is highly concentrated, highly dispersed or not sufficiently transparent in a way that could negatively impact the availability or timely implementation of the institution's recovery or resolution actions;
ali je kreditna institucija stalno povezana s centralnim organom, kot je navedeno v členu 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, in ali bi porazdelitev izgub med povezanimi institucijami pomenila bistveno oviro za običajne insolvenčne postopke.
whether the credit institution that is a member of an IPS, as referred to in Article 113(7) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, provides critical functions to other IPS members, including clearing, treasury or other services;
Oceno iz odstavka 1 pristojni organi in organi za reševanje izvajajo neodvisno, ob upoštevanju ciljev načrtovanja sanacije in reševanja.
whether the credit institution is affiliated to a central body, as referred to in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, and the mutualisation of losses among affiliated institutions would constitute a substantive impediment to normal insolvency proceedings.
Ocena iz odstavka 1 se lahko izvede za kategorijo kreditnih institucij, kadar ustrezni pristojni organ ali organ za reševanje ugotovi, da imata dve ali več kreditnih institucij podobne značilnosti v smislu vseh kvalitativnih vidikov iz odstavka 1.
The assessment referred to in paragraph 1 shall be performed independently by competent and resolution authorities having regard to the objectives pursued by recovery and resolution planning.
Člen 3
The assessment referred to in paragraph 1 may be performed for a category of credit institutions where the relevant competent or resolution authority determines that two or more credit institutions have similar characteristics in terms of all of the qualitative considerations set out in paragraph 1.
Kvantitativna ocena za investicijska podjetja
Article 3
Pristojni organi in organi za reševanje redno in vsaj vsaki dve leti ocenijo učinek propada investicijskega podjetja na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja na podlagi:
Quantitative assessment for investment firms
skupnega kvantitativnega rezultata, izračunanega na podlagi kazalnikov iz Priloge II;
Competent and resolution authorities shall assess the impact of the failure of an investment firm on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions on a regular basis and at least every two years and on the basis of:
uteži, ki jih za navedene kazalnike določijo pristojni organi in organi za reševanje.
the total quantitative score calculated based on the indicators referred to in Annex II;
Vrednosti kazalnikov se določijo na podlagi kazalnikov iz Priloge III.
the weights assigned to those indicators by competent and resolution authorities.
Če vrednosti kazalnikov iz Priloge I niso na voljo, se ocena iz odstavka 1 izvede na podlagi približkov, ki so v največji možni meri v korelaciji s kazalniki, kakor so opredeljeni v Prilogi III.
The values of the indicators shall be determined on the basis of the indicators as specified in Annex III.
Kadar približki niso na voljo, lahko pristojni organi in organi za reševanje nadomestijo kazalnike iz Priloge II z drugimi ustreznimi kazalniki.
Where the indicator values of Annex II are not available, the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made on the basis of proxies correlated to the greatest extent possible with the indicators as specified in Annex III.
Prag za skupni kvantitativni rezultat določijo pristojni organi in organi za reševanje.
Where proxies are not available, competent and resolution authorities may replace the indicators referred to in Annex II with other relevant indicators.
Investicijsko podjetje, ki ima skupni kvantitativni rezultat enak ali višji od praga iz odstavka 3, se obravnava kot institucija, katere propad bi verjetno imel znaten negativen učinek na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja.
The threshold for the total quantitative score shall be set by competent and resolution authorities.
Če je bilo investicijsko podjetje v skladu s členom 131(1) Direktive 2013/36/EU opredeljeno kot GSPI ali DSPI ali na podlagi smernic o skupnih postopkih in metodologijah za proces nadzorniškega pregledovanja in ovrednotenja, izdanih v skladu s členom 107(3) navedene direktive, razvrščeno kot kategorija 1, lahko pristojni organi in organi za reševanje, ne da bi uporabili odstavke 1 do 4 tega člena, ugotovijo, da bi imel propad navedene institucije verjetno znaten negativen učinek na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja.
An investment firm with a total quantitative score equal to or higher than the threshold referred to in paragraph 3 shall be regarded as an institution the failure of which would be likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions.
Člen 4
Where an investment firm has been identified as a G-SII or an O-SII in accordance with Article 131(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU or has been classified as Category 1 on the basis of the guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for SREP issued in accordance with Article 107(3) of that Directive, competent and resolution authorities may, without applying paragraphs 1 to 4 of this Article, establish that the failure of that institution would be likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions.
Kvalitativna ocena za investicijska podjetja
Article 4
Če se investicijsko podjetje ne šteje za institucijo, katere propad bi v skladu s členom 3 verjetno imel znaten negativen učinek na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja, pristojni organi in organi za reševanje redno in vsaj vsaki dve leti ocenijo učinek propada navedenega investicijskega podjetja na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja ter pri tem upoštevajo vsaj naslednje kvalitativne vidike:
Qualitative assessment for investment firms
obseg, v katerem investicijsko podjetje opravlja kritične funkcije v eni ali več državah članicah;
Where an investment firm is not regarded as an institution the failure of which would be likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, other institutions and funding conditions pursuant to Article 3, competent and resolution authorities shall assess the impact of that investment firm's failure on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions on a regular basis and at least every two years and having regard to, at least, all of the following qualitative considerations:
ali je delniška struktura investicijskega podjetja zelo koncentrirana, zelo razpršena ali pa ni dovolj pregledna na način, ki bi lahko negativno vplival na razpoložljivost ali pravočasno izvedbo ukrepov institucije za sanacijo ali reševanje;
the extent to which the investment firm performs critical functions in one or more Member States;
ali investicijsko podjetje, ki je član institucionalne sheme za zaščito vlog, kot je navedena v členu 113(7) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, drugim članom institucionalne sheme za zaščito vlog zagotavlja kritične funkcije, vključno s klirinškimi, zakladniškimi ali drugimi storitvami;
whether the investment firm's shareholding structure is highly concentrated, highly dispersed, or not sufficiently transparent in a way that could negatively impact the availability or timely implementation of the institution's recovery or resolution actions;
ali je večina strank investicijskega podjetja neprofesionalnih ali profesionalnih;
whether an investment firm that is a member of an IPS, as referred to in Article 113(7) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, provides critical functions to other IPS members, including clearing, treasury or other services;
v kolikšni meri denarna sredstva in finančni instrumenti, ki jih ima v lasti investicijsko podjetje v imenu svojih strank, ne bi bila v celoti zavarovana z odškodninsko shemo za vlagatelje iz Direktive 97/9/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta;
whether the majority of the investment firm's clients are retail or professional;
ali je poslovni model investicijskega podjetja zapleten, vključno z obsegom njegovih naložbenih dejavnosti.
the extent to which money and financial instruments held by the investment firm on its clients' behalf would not be fully protected by an investor-compensation scheme as referred to in Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council;
Člen 5
whether the investment firm's business model is complex, including the scale of its investment activities.
Institucije, ki spadajo v skupine
Article 5
Za institucijo, ki je del skupine, se ocene iz členov 1 do 4 opravijo na ravni nadrejene družbe v državi članici, v kateri je institucija pridobila dovoljenje.
Institutions belonging to groups
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 se za institucijo, ki je del skupine, nad katero se izvaja konsolidirani nadzor v skladu s členoma 111 in 112 Direktive 2013/36/EU, ocene iz členov 1 do 4 te uredbe izvedejo na naslednjih ravneh:
For an institution that is part of a group, the assessments referred to in Articles 1 to 4 shall be made at the level of the parent undertaking in the Member State where the institution has been authorised.
na ravni nadrejene družbe v Uniji;
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for an institution that is part of a group subject to consolidated supervision pursuant to Articles 111 and 112 of Directive 2013/36/EU, the assessments referred to in Articles 1 to 4 of this Regulation shall be made at the following levels:
na ravni vsake nadrejene družbe v državi članici ali, če v državi članici ni nadrejene družbe, na ravni vsake samostojne podrejene družbe skupine v državi članici.
the level of the Union parent undertaking;
Institucije, ki so del skupine, nad katero se izvaja konsolidiran nadzor v skladu s členoma 111 in 112 Direktive 2013/36/EU, se obravnavajo kot institucije, katerih propad bi verjetno imel znaten negativen učinek na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja, kadar na kateri koli ravni iz točk (a) in (b) odstavka 2 tega člena velja kar koli od naslednjega:
the level of each parent undertaking in a Member State or, where there is no parent undertaking in a Member State, the level of each stand-alone subsidiary of the group in a Member State.
institucija ima skupni kvantitativni rezultat, ki je enak ali presega prag, ki so ga določili pristojni organi in organi za reševanje v skladu s členom 1(3) ali členom 3(3);
Institutions that are part of a group subject to consolidated supervision pursuant to Articles 111 and 112 of Directive 2013/36/EU shall be regarded as institutions the failure of which would be likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions, where any of the following apply at any of the levels referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 2 of this Article:
merila iz člena 2(1) ali člena 4(1) so izpolnjena.
the institution has a total quantitative score that is equal to or exceeds the threshold set by competent and resolution authorities pursuant to Article 1(3) or Article 3(3);
Odstavka 2 in 3 se ne uporabljata za institucije, za katere velja načrt sanacije iz člena 8(2)(b) Direktive 2014/59/EU.
the criteria in Article 2(1) or Article 4(1) are satisfied.
Pristojni organi in organi za reševanje uskladijo ocene iz tega člena in si izmenjajo vse potrebne informacije v okviru kolegijev nadzornikov in kolegijev za reševanje.
Paragraphs 2 and 3 shall not apply to institutions that are subject to a recovery plan as referred to in Article 8(2)(b) of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Člen 6
Competent and resolution authorities shall coordinate the assessments referred to in this Article and exchange all necessary information within the framework of supervisory and resolution colleges.
Ocena spodbujevalnih bank
Article 6
Pristojni organi in organi za reševanje lahko obravnavajo spodbujevalne banke, kakor so opredeljene v členu 3(27) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/63, kot institucije, katerih propad verjetno ne bi imel znatnega negativnega učinka na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja, ne da bi uporabili odstavka 2 in 7 člena 1 in člen 5(3), če kvalitativni vidiki iz člena 2(1) niso izpolnjeni na nobeni od naslednjih ravni:
Assessment of promotional banks
Člen 7
Competent and resolution authorities may regard promotional banks, as defined in Article 3(27) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63, as institutions the failure of which would not be likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions, without applying paragraphs 2 and 7 of Article 1 and Article 5(3), where the qualitative considerations of Article 2(1) are not satisfied at any of the following levels:
Ocena kreditnih institucij, ki so predmet postopka prenehanja v skladu s predpisi
Article 7
Pristojni organi in organi za reševanje lahko kreditne institucije, ki so predmet postopka prenehanja v skladu s predpisi, obravnavajo kot institucije, katerih propad verjetno ne bi imel znatnega negativnega učinka na finančne trge, druge institucije ali pogoje financiranja, ne da bi uporabili odstavka 2 in 7 člena 1 in člen 5(3), če kvalitativni vidiki iz člena 2(1) niso izpolnjeni na nobeni od naslednjih ravni:
Assessment of credit institutions subject to an orderly winding-up process
Člen 8
Competent and resolution authorities may regard credit institutions that are subject to an orderly winding-up process as institutions the failure of which is not likely to have a significant negative effect on financial markets, other institutions or funding conditions, without the application of paragraphs 2 and 7 of Article 1 and Article 5(3), where the qualitative considerations of Article 2(1) are not satisfied at any of the following levels:
Ocena, ki jo izvedejo pristojni organi in organi za reševanje iz iste države članice
Article 8
Ob upoštevanju različnih namenov načrtovanja sanacije in reševanja lahko pristojni organi in organi za reševanje iz iste države članice pridejo do različnih zaključkov v zvezi z uporabo členov 1 do 4, 6 in 7, in v tem primeru redno preverjajo, ali so ti različni zaključki še vedno upravičeni.
Assessment by competent and resolution authorities from the same Member State
Člen 9
Taking into account different purposes of recovery and resolution planning, competent and resolution authorities from the same Member State may reach different conclusions with regard to the application of Articles 1 to 4, 6 and 7, in which case they shall regularly assess whether those different conclusions remain justified.
Začetek veljavnosti
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 25. oktobra 2018
Done at Brussels, 25 October 2018.
Predsednik
For the Commission
UL L 173, 12.6.2014, str. 190.
The President
Uredba (EU) št. 806/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. julija 2014 o določitvi enotnih pravil in enotnega postopka za reševanje kreditnih institucij in določenih investicijskih podjetij v okviru enotnega mehanizma za reševanje in enotnega sklada za reševanje ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 (UL L 225, 30.7.2014, str. 1).
OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 680/2014 z dne 16. aprila 2014 o določitvi izvedbenih tehničnih standardov v zvezi z nadzorniškim poročanjem institucij v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 191, 28.6.2014, str. 1).
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ L 225, 30.7.2014, p. 1).
Direktiva 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o dostopu do dejavnosti kreditnih institucij in bonitetnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij, spremembi Direktive 2002/87/ES in razveljavitvi direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES (UL L 176, 27.6.2013, str. 338).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 of 16 April 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 191, 28.6.2014, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o ustanovitvi Evropskega nadzornega organa (Evropski bančni organ) in o spremembi Sklepa št. 716/2009/ES ter razveljavitvi Sklepa Komisije 2009/78/ES (UL L 331, 15.12.2010, str. 12).