natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The establishment of links between two or more alerts should have no impact on the action to be taken, the review period for alerts or the access rights to the alerts.
Vzpostavitev povezav med dvema ali več razpisi ukrepov ne bi smela vplivati na ukrep, ki ga je treba sprejeti, roke za preverjanje razpisov ukrepov ali pravice dostopa do razpisov ukrepov.
A greater level of effectiveness, harmonisation and consistency can be achieved by making it mandatory to enter into SIS all entry bans issued by the national competent authorities in accordance with procedures respecting Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and by setting common rules for entering alerts for refusal of entry and stay upon the return of an illegally staying third-country national.
Večjo učinkovitost, usklajenost in doslednost je mogoče doseči tako, da se zagotovi obvezen vnos v SIS vseh prepovedi vstopa, ki jih izdajo pristojni nacionalni organi v skladu s postopki, ki upoštevajo Direktivo 2008/115/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, in tako, da se določijo skupna pravila za vnos takih razpisov ukrepov za zavrnitev vstopa ali prepoved prebivanja po vrnitvi nezakonito prebivajočega državljana tretje države.
Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure that no time-gap exists between the moment in which the third-country national concerned leaves the Schengen area and the activation of the alert in SIS.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da med trenutkom, ko zadevni državljan tretje države zapusti schengensko območje, in aktivacijo razpisa ukrepa v SIS ni časovne vrzeli.
This should ensure the enforcement of entry bans at external border crossing points, effectively preventing re-entry into the Schengen area.
To bi moralo zagotoviti izvrševanje prepovedi vstopa na zunanjih mejnih prehodih, kar bi učinkovito preprečevalo ponovne vstope na schengensko območje.
Persons in respect of whom a decision for refusal of entry and stay is taken should have the right to appeal against that decision.
Osebe, glede katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev o zavrnitvi vstopa in prepovedi prebivanja, bi morale imeti pravico do pritožbe zoper to odločitev.
The right of appeal should comply with Directive 2008/115/EC where the decision is related to return.
Pravica do pritožbe bi morala biti v skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES, kadar se odločitev nanaša na vrnitev.
This Regulation should set mandatory rules for the consultation and notification of national authorities where a third-country national holds or might obtain a valid residence permit or long-stay visa granted in one Member State, and another Member State intends to or has already entered an alert for refusal of entry and stay on that third-country national.
Ta uredba bi morala določati obvezna pravila za posvetovanje z nacionalnimi organi in uradno obveščanje teh organov, kadar državljan tretje države ima ali bi lahko pridobil veljavno dovoljenje za prebivanje ali vizum za dolgoročno prebivanje, odobren v eni državi članici, druga država članica pa namerava v zvezi s tem državljanom tretje države vnesti ali je že vnesla razpis ukrepa za zavrnitev vstopa in prepoved prebivanja.
Such situations create serious uncertainties for border guards, police and immigration authorities.
Take okoliščine povzročajo veliko negotovost za mejno policijo, policijo in organe za priseljevanje.
Therefore, it is appropriate to provide for a mandatory timeframe for rapid consultation with a definite result in order to ensure that third-country nationals who are entitled to reside lawfully in the territory of the Member States are entitled to enter that territory without difficulty and that those who are not entitled to enter are prevented from doing so.
Zato je primerno zagotoviti obvezen časovni okvir za hitro posvetovanje, z dokončnim rezultatom, da se državljanom tretjih držav, ki imajo pravico, da zakonito bivajo na ozemlju držav članic, dovoli neoviran vstop na to ozemlje, državljanom iz tretjih držav, ki nimajo te pravice, pa se to prepreči.
When deleting an alert in SIS following a consultation between Member States, the issuing Member State should be able to keep the third-country national concerned on its national list of alerts.
Pri izbrisu razpisa ukrepa v SIS na podlagi posvetovanja med državami članicami bi moralo biti državam članicam izdajateljica omogočeno, da zadevnega državljana tretje države obdržijo na svojem nacionalnem seznamu razpisov ukrepov.
This Regulation should be without prejudice to the application of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v uporabo Direktive 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Alerts should not be kept in SIS longer than the time required to fulfil the specific purposes for which they were entered.
Razpisi ukrepov bi se morali hraniti v SIS le toliko časa, kolikor je to potrebno za izpolnitev specifičnega namena, za katerega so bili vneseni.
Within three years of entry of an alert into SIS, the issuing Member State should review the need to retain it.
Država članica izdajateljica bi morala v treh letih po vnosu razpisa ukrepa v SIS preveriti, ali ga je še treba ohraniti.
However, if the national decision on which the alert is based provides for a longer period of validity than three years, the alert should be reviewed within five years.
Če je z nacionalno odločbo, na kateri temelji razpis ukrepa, določeno obdobje veljavnosti, daljše od treh let, bi bilo treba razpis ukrepa pregledati v petih letih.
Decisions to retain alerts on persons should be based on a comprehensive individual assessment.
Odločitve o ohranitvi razpisov ukrepov za osebe bi morale temeljiti na celoviti posamični oceni.
Member States should review alerts on persons within the prescribed review period and should keep statistics on the number of alerts on persons for which the retention period has been extended.
Države članice bi morale v predpisanem roku za preverjanje preveriti razpise ukrepov za osebe in hraniti statistične podatke o številu razpisov ukrepov za osebe, katerih obdobje hrambe je bilo podaljšano.
Entering an alert into SIS and extending the expiry date of an alert in SIS should be subject to a proportionality requirement involving examination of whether a concrete case is adequate, relevant and important enough to warrant insertion of an alert in SIS.
Za vnašanje razpisa ukrepa v SIS in podaljševanje obdobja izteka veljavnosti razpisa ukrepa v SIS bi morala veljati zahteva sorazmernosti, na podlagi katere se preuči, ali je konkretna zadeva primerna, relevantna in dovolj pomembna, da se v SIS vnese razpis ukrepa.
Where terrorist offences are concerned, the case should be considered adequate, relevant and important enough to warrant an alert in SIS.
V primeru terorističnih kaznivih dejanj bi bilo treba zadevo obravnavati kot primerno, relevantno in dovolj pomembno, da se v SIS vnese razpis ukrepa.
For public or national security reasons, Member States should be allowed exceptionally to refrain from entering an alert into SIS when it is likely that this would obstruct official or legal inquiries, investigations or procedures.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba zaradi javne ali nacionalne varnosti dovoliti, da razpisa ukrepov izjemoma ne vnesejo v SIS, kadar je verjetno, da bi to oviralo uradne ali zakonite poizvedbe, preiskave ali postopke.
The integrity of SIS data is of primary importance.
Celovitost podatkov SIS je ključnega pomena.
Therefore, appropriate safeguards should be provided to process SIS data at central as well as at national level to ensure the end-to-end security of the data.
Zato bi bilo treba zagotoviti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe za obdelavo podatkov SIS na centralni in nacionalni ravni, da se zagotovi varnost podatkov od konca do konca.
The authorities involved in the data processing should be bound by the security requirements of this Regulation and be subject to a uniform incident reporting procedure.
Organe, ki sodelujejo pri obdelavi podatkov, bi morale zavezovati varnostne zahteve te uredbe in zanje bi moral veljati enoten postopek poročanja o incidentih.
Their staff should be appropriately trained and be informed of any offences and penalties in this respect.
Njihovo osebje bi moralo biti ustrezno usposobljeno in obveščeno o morebitnih kršitvah in kaznih v tej zvezi.
Data processed in SIS and the related supplementary information exchanged pursuant to this Regulation should not be transferred or made available to third countries or to international organisations.
Podatki, obdelani v SIS, in povezane dopolnilne informacije, ki se izmenjujejo na podlagi te uredbe, se ne bi smeli posredovati ali dajati na voljo tretjim državam ali mednarodnim organizacijam.
To enhance the efficiency of immigration authorities' work when deciding on the right of third-country nationals to enter and stay in the territories of the Member States and on the return of illegally staying third-country nationals, it is appropriate to grant those authorities access to SIS under this Regulation.
Da bi organi za priseljevanje lahko učinkoviteje sprejemali odločitve o pravici državljanov tretjih držav do vstopa in prebivanja na ozemljih držav članic ter vračanju nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav, je primerno, da se tem organom zagotovi dostop do SIS na podlagi te uredbe.
Without prejudice to more specific rules laid down in this Regulation for the processing of personal data, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should apply to the processing of personal data by the Member States under this Regulation unless such processing is carried out by the national competent authorities for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of terrorist offences or of other serious criminal offences.
Brez poseganja v podrobnejša pravila glede obdelave osebnih podatkov iz te uredbe bi bilo treba za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki jo na podlagi te uredbe izvajajo države članice, uporabljati Uredbo (EU) 2016/679, razen če to obdelavo izvajajo pristojni nacionalni organi za namene preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali preganjanja terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj.
Without prejudice to more specific rules laid down in this Regulation, the national laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted pursuant to Directive (EU) 2016/680 should apply to the processing of personal data under this Regulation by the national competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties.
Brez poseganja v podrobnejša pravila iz te uredbe bi se za obdelavo osebnih podatkov v, ki jih pristojni nacionalni organi v skladu s to uredbo obdelujejo za namene preprečevanja, odkrivanja, preiskovanja ali preganjanja terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanja kazenskih sankcij v skladu s to uredbo, morali uporabljati nacionalni zakoni, predpisi in upravne določbe, sprejeti v skladu z Direktivo (EU) 2016/680.
Access to data entered into SIS and the right to search such data by national competent authorities which are responsible for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties are to be subject to all relevant provisions of this Regulation and those of Directive (EU) 2016/680 as transposed into national law, and in particular to monitoring by the supervisory authorities referred to in Directive (EU) 2016/680.
Za dostop do podatkov, vnesenih v SIS, in pravico do opravljanja poizvedb v teh podatkih s strani pristojnih nacionalnih organov, ki so pristojni za preprečevanje, odkrivanje, preiskovanje ali preganjanje terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, bi morale veljati vse zadevne določbe iz te uredbe in Direktive (EU) 2016/680, kot so bile prenesene v nacionalno zakonodajo, in zlasti glede spremljanja s strani nadzornih organov iz Direktive (EU) 2016/680.
Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council should apply to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions and bodies when carrying out their responsibilities under this Regulation.
Uredba (EU) 2018/1725 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta bi se morala uporabljati za obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani institucij in organov Unije, kadar izvajajo svoje naloge v okviru te uredbe.
Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council should apply to the processing of personal data by Europol under this Regulation.
Za obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani Europola na podlagi te uredbe bi se morala uporabljati Uredba (EU) 2016/794 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
When using SIS, the competent authorities should ensure that the dignity and integrity of the person whose data are processed are respected.
Pri uporabi SIS bi morali pristojni organi zagotoviti spoštovanje dostojanstva in integritete oseb, katerih podatki se obdelujejo.
Processing of personal data for the purposes of this Regulation is not to result in discrimination against persons on any grounds, such as sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov za namene te uredbe ne sme povzročiti diskriminacije oseb na kakršni koli podlagi, na primer zaradi spola, rase ali etničnega porekla, vere ali prepričanja, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti.
Insofar as confidentiality is concerned, the relevant provisions of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Union laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (‘Staff Regulations’) should apply to officials or other servants employed and working in connection with SIS.
Kar zadeva zaupnost, bi se morale za uradnike in druge uslužbence, katerih delo je povezano s SIS, uporabljati ustrezne določbe Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropske unije in Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Unije iz Uredbe Sveta (EGS, Euratom, ESPJ) št. 259/68 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Kadrovski predpisi).
Both the Member States and eu-LISA should maintain security plans in order to facilitate the implementation of security obligations and should cooperate with each other in order to address security issues from a common perspective.
Države članice in eu-LISA bi morale imeti varnostne načrte za omogočanje lažjega izvajanja varnostnih obveznosti ter bi morale medsebojno sodelovati z namenom obravnave vprašanj glede varnosti iz skupnega zornega kota.
The national independent supervisory authorities referred to in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 (‘supervisory authorities’) should monitor the lawfulness of the processing of personal data by the Member States under this Regulation, including the exchange of supplementary information.
Neodvisni nacionalni nadzorni organi iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 in Direktive (EU) 2016/680 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nadzorni organi), bi morali spremljati zakonitost obdelave osebnih podatkov na podlagi te uredbe, vključno prek izmenjave dopolnilnih informacij.
The supervisory authorities should be granted sufficient resources to carry out this task.
Nadzorni organi bi morali prejeti zadostna sredstva za izvajanje te naloge.
The rights of data subjects to access, rectify and erase their personal data that is stored in SIS, and any subsequent remedies before national courts as well as the mutual recognition of judgments should be provided for.
Treba bi bilo določiti pravice posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, do dostopa do podatkov, popravkov in izbrisa njihovih osebnih podatkov, ki so shranjeni v SIS, vsa naknadna pravna sredstva pred nacionalnimi sodišči ter vzajemno priznavanje sodb.
It is also appropriate to require annual statistics from Member States.
Primerno je tudi, da se od držav članic zahtevajo letni statistični podatki.
The supervisory authorities should ensure that an audit of the data processing operations in their Member State's national systems is carried out in accordance with international auditing standards at least every four years.
Nadzorni organi bi morali zagotoviti, da se vsaj vsaka štiri leta izvede revizija postopkov obdelave podatkov v nacionalnih sistemih v njihovi državi članici v skladu z mednarodnimi revizijskimi standardi.
The audit should either be carried out by the supervisory authorities, or the supervisory authorities should directly order the audit from an independent data protection auditor.
Revizijo bi morali izvesti nadzorni organi oziroma bi morali nadzorni organi revizijo naročiti neposredno pri neodvisnem revizorju za varstvo podatkov.
The independent auditor should remain under the control and responsibility of the supervisory authorities concerned, which therefore should instruct the auditor themselves and provide a clearly defined purpose, scope and methodology for the audit as well as guidance and supervision concerning the audit and its final results.
Neodvisni revizor bi moral ostati pod nadzorom in odgovornostjo zadevnih nadzornih organov, ki bi zato morali sami naročiti revizijo in jasno opredeliti namen, področje uporabe in metodologijo za revizijo ter zagotoviti usmerjanje in nadzor revizije ter končnih rezultatov.
The European Data Protection Supervisor should monitor the activities of the Union institutions and bodies in relation to the processing of personal data under this Regulation.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov bi moral spremljati dejavnosti institucij in organov Unije v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov na podlagi te uredbe.
The European Data Protection Supervisor and the supervisory authorities should cooperate with each other in monitoring SIS.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov in nadzorni organi bi morali medsebojno sodelovati pri spremljanju SIS.
The European Data Protection Supervisor should be granted sufficient resources to fulfil the tasks entrusted to it under this Regulation, including assistance from persons with expertise in biometric data.
Evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov bi bilo treba dodeliti dovolj virov za izpolnjevanje nalog, ki so mu zaupane na podlagi te uredbe, vključno s pomočjo oseb s strokovnim znanjem na področju biometričnih podatkov.
Regulation (EU) 2016/794 provides that Europol is to support and strengthen actions carried out by the national competent authorities and their cooperation in combating terrorism and serious crime and to provide analysis and threat assessments.
V Uredbi (EU) 2016/794 je določeno, da Europol podpira in krepi ukrepe pristojnih nacionalnih organov ter njihovo vzajemno sodelovanje v boju proti terorizmu in hudim kaznivim dejanjem ter zagotavlja analize in ocene ogroženosti.
In order to facilitate Europol in carrying out its tasks, in particular within the European Migrant Smuggling Centre, it is appropriate to allow Europol access to categories of alerts as provided for in this Regulation.
Da se Europolu olajša izvajanje nalog, zlasti v okviru Evropskega centra za boj proti tihotapljenju migrantov, je primerno, da se Europolu omogoči dostop do kategorij razpisov ukrepov, določenih v tej uredbi.
In order to bridge the gap in information sharing on terrorism, in particular on foreign terrorist fighters – where monitoring of their movement is crucial – Member States are encouraged to share information on terrorism-related activity with Europol.
Za premostitev vrzeli pri izmenjavi informacij o terorizmu, zlasti o tujih terorističnih borcih – pri čemer je spremljanje njihovega gibanja bistvenega pomena –, se države članice spodbuja, da z Europolom izmenjujejo informacije v zvezi z dejavnostmi, povezanimi s terorizmom.
This information sharing should be carried out through the exchange of supplementary information with Europol on the alerts concerned.
Ta izmenjava informacij bi morala potekati prek izmenjave dopolnilnih informacij o zadevnih razpisih ukrepov z Europolom.
For this purpose Europol should set up a connection with the Communication Infrastructure.
V ta namen bi moral Europol vzpostaviti povezavo s komunikacijsko infrastrukturo.
It is also necessary to set out clear rules for Europol on the processing and downloading of SIS data to allow it to use SIS comprehensively, provided that data protection standards are complied with as provided for in this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2016/794.
Treba je določiti tudi jasna pravila za Europol o obdelavi in prenosu podatkov SIS, da se mu omogoči kar najbolj celovita uporaba SIS ob upoštevanju skladnosti s standardi varstva podatkov, kot so določeni v tej uredbi in Uredbi (EU) 2016/794.
In cases where searches carried out by Europol in SIS reveal the existence of an alert entered by a Member State, Europol cannot take the required action.
V primerih, ko poizvedbe, ki jih v SIS opravi Europol, razkrijejo obstoj razpisa ukrepa, ki ga je vnesla država članica, Europol ne more izvesti zahtevanega ukrepa.
Therefore it should inform the Member State concerned through the exchange of supplementary information with the respective SIRENE Bureau, to allow that Member State to follow up the case.
Zato bi moral prek izmenjave dopolnilnih informacij z ustreznim uradom SIRENE o tem obvestiti zadevno državo članico in ji omogočiti, da lahko nadalje ukrepa.
Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council provides, for the purpose of that Regulation, that the host Member State is to authorise the members of the teams referred to in point (8) of Article 2 of that Regulation deployed by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency to consult Union databases where this consultation is necessary for fulfilling operational aims specified in the operational plan on border checks, border surveillance and return.
Uredba (EU) 2016/1624 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za namene navedene uredbe določa, da mora država članica gostiteljica članom skupin iz točke 8 člena 2 navedene uredbe, napotenim s strani Evropske agencije za mejno in obalno stražo, dovoliti vpogled v podatkovne zbirke Unije, kadar je to potrebno za izpolnjevanje operativnih ciljev, določenih v operativnem načrtu o mejni kontroli, varovanju meje in vračanju.
Other relevant Union agencies, in particular the European Asylum Support Office and Europol, may also deploy experts who are not members of the staff of those Union agencies as part of migration management support teams.
Druge zadevne agencije Unije, zlasti Evropski azilni podporni urad in Europol, lahko v okviru podpornih skupin za upravljanje migracij napotijo tudi strokovnjake, ki niso člani osebja teh agencij Unije.
The objective of the deployment of the teams referred to in points (8) and (9) of Article 2 of that Regulation is to provide technical and operational reinforcement to the requesting Member States, especially to those facing disproportionate migratory challenges.
Cilj napotitve skupin iz točk 8 in 9 člena 2 navedene uredbe je zagotoviti tehnične in operativne okrepitve za države članice, ki zanje zaprosijo, zlasti za tiste, ki se soočajo z nesorazmernimi migracijskimi izzivi.
For the teams referred to in points (8) and (9) of Article 2 of that Regulation to fulfil their tasks, they require access to SIS through a technical interface of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency connecting to Central SIS.
Da bi skupine iz točk 8 in 9 člena 2 navedene uredbe izpolnile svoje naloge, jim je treba zagotoviti dostop do SIS prek tehničnega vmesnika Evropske agencije za mejno in obalno stražo, s katerim se povežejo s centralnim SIS.
In cases where searches in SIS carried out by the teams referred to in points (8) and (9) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 or by the teams of staff reveal the existence of an alert entered by a Member State, the member of the team or the staff cannot take the required action unless authorised to do so by the host Member State.
V primerih, ko poizvedbe v SIS, ki jih opravijo skupine iz točk 8 in 9 člena 2 Uredbe (EU) 2016/1624 ali skupine osebja, razkrijejo obstoj razpisa ukrepa, ki ga je vnesla država članica, član skupine ali osebja ne more izvesti zahtevanega ukrepa, razen če nima za to pooblastila države članice gostiteljice.