natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mechanisms for submitting notices to hosting service providers regarding content which is considered to be illegal content are an important means to tackle illegal content online.
Mehanizmi za predložitev prijav ponudnikom storitev gostovanja glede vsebine, ki se šteje za nezakonito, so pomembno sredstvo za boj proti nezakonitim spletnim vsebinam.
Such mechanisms should facilitate the notification by all individuals or entities which wish to do so.
Takšni mehanizmi bi morali vsem posameznikom in subjektom, ki želijo podati prijavo, to omogočati.
Therefore, those mechanisms should be easy to access and use for all users.
Zato bi morali biti navedeni mehanizmi vsem uporabnikom lahko dostopni in enostavni za uporabo.
However, hosting service providers should remain flexible, for instance as regards the reporting format or technology to be used, so as to allow for efficient solutions and to avoid disproportionate burdens on those providers.
Vendar pa bi morali ponudniki storitev gostovanja ohraniti prožnost, na primer v zvezi z obliko poročanja ali tehnologijo, ki se uporabi, da bi se omogočile učinkovite rešitve in da bi se izognili nesorazmernim obremenitvam navedenih ponudnikov.
In accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice relating to Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC, notices should be sufficiently precise and adequately substantiated so as to allow the hosting service provider receiving them to take an informed and diligent decision as regards the effect to be given to the notice.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča v zvezi s členom 14 Direktive 2000/31/ES bi morale biti prijave dovolj natančne in ustrezno utemeljene, da bi se ponudniku storitev gostovanja, ki te prijave prejmejo, omogočilo sprejeti informirano in premišljeno odločitev glede nadaljnjih ukrepov na podlagi prijave.
It should therefore be ensured, as much as possible, that that standard is met.
Zato bi bilo treba v največji možni meri zagotoviti, da so ti standardi doseženi.
However, whether or not a given notice leads to knowledge or awareness within the meaning of Article 14 of that Directive is to be to be assessed in light of the specificities of the individual case at hand, bearing in mind that such knowledge or awareness can also be obtained in other manners than through notices.
Ne glede na to, ali prijava vodi do vedenja ali zavedanja v smislu člena 14 navedene direktive, jo je treba obravnavati v luči posebnosti posameznega primera, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, da se takšno vedenje ali zavedanje lahko pridobi tudi na druge načine in ne samo prek prijav.
Possessing the contact details of the notice provider is generally not necessary for the hosting service provider to be able to take an informed and diligent decision on the follow-up to be given to the notice received.
Da bi ponudnik storitev gostovanja lahko sprejel informirano in premišljeno odločitev o nadaljnjih ukrepih na podlagi prejete prijave, običajno ne potrebuje kontaktnih podatkov prijavitelja.
Making the provision of contact details a prerequisite for the submission of a notice would entail an obstacle to notification.
Če bi bila navedba kontaktnih podatkov obvezen predpogoj za prijavo, bi to pomenilo oviro za podajanje prijav.
However, the inclusion of the contact details is necessary for the hosting service provider to be able to provide feedback.
Vendar pa je vključitev kontaktnih podatkov potrebna, da lahko ponudnik storitev gostovanja zagotovi povratne informacije.
Including his or her contact details should therefore be a possibility for the notice provider, without this being required.
Zato bi za prijavitelja morala biti vključitev kontaktnih podatkov možna, vendar ne obvezna.
In order to enhance transparency and the accuracy of notice-and-action mechanisms and to allow for redress where needed, hosting service providers should, where they possess the contact details of notice providers and/or content providers, timely and adequately inform those persons of the steps taken in the context of the said mechanisms, in particular as regards their decisions on the requested removal or disabling of access to the content concerned.
Da bi se povečala preglednost in pravilnost mehanizmov prijave in ukrepanja in bi se po potrebi omogočila odprava zadevnih vsebin, bi morali ponudniki storitev gostovanja, če imajo kontaktne podatke o prijaviteljih in/ali ponudnikih vsebin, pravočasno in ustrezno obvestiti navedene osebe o ukrepih, sprejetih v okviru teh mehanizmov, zlasti kar zadeva njihove odločitve o zahtevani odstranitvi zadevnih vsebin ali onemogočenju dostopa do njih.
The information to be provided should be proportionate, in that it should correspond to the submissions made by the persons concerned in their notices or counter-notices, while allowing for appropriate and differentiated solutions and without leading to an excessive burden on the providers.
Podatki, ki jih je treba zagotoviti, bi morali biti sorazmerni, in sicer bi morali ustrezati navedbam zadevnih oseb iz njihove prijave ali odgovora na prijavo, pri čemer bi bilo treba omogočiti primerne in raznolike rešitve in ne pretirano obremenjevati ponudnikov.
In order to ensure transparency and fairness and to avoid the unintended removal of content which is not illegal content, content providers should, as a matter of principle, be informed of the decision to remove or disable access to the content stored at their request and be given the possibility to contest the decision through a counter-notice, with a view to having that decision reversed where appropriate, regardless of whether that decision was taken on the basis of a notice or a referral or pursuant to proactive measures by the hosting service provider.
Da bi zagotovili preglednost in pravičnost ter da se prepreči nenamerna odstranitev zakonitih vsebin, bi morali biti ponudniki vsebin načeloma obveščeni o odločitvi, da se odstranijo vsebine, ki se hranijo na njihovo zahtevo, ali onemogoči dostop do njih, in imeti možnost izpodbijanja odločitve z odgovorom na prijavo, katerega namen je, kjer je to primerno, razveljavitev odločitve, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta odločitev sprejeta na podlagi prijave ali obvestila ali na podlagi proaktivnih ukrepov ponudnika storitev gostovanja.
However, given the nature of the content at issue, the aim of such a counter-notice procedure and the additional burden it entails for hosting service providers, there is no justification for recommending to provide such information about that decision and that possibility to contest the decision where it is manifest that the content in question is illegal content and relates to serious criminal offences involving a threat to the life or safety of persons, such as offences specified in Directive (EU) 2017/541 and Directive 2011/93/EU.
Vendar glede na naravo zadevne vsebine, namen takega postopka z odgovorom na prijavo in dodatno breme, ki ga pomeni za ponudnike storitev gostovanja, ni razloga za priporočilo, da naj bi zagotovili informacije o takšni odločitvi in možnosti izpodbijanja odločitve, če je očitno, da so zadevne vsebine nezakonite in se nanašajo na huda kazniva dejanja, ki ogrožajo življenje ali varnost ljudi, kot so kazniva dejanja, določena v Direktivi (EU) 2017/541 in Direktivi 2011/93/EU.
In addition, in certain cases, reasons of public policy and public security, and in particular reasons related to the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, may justify not directly providing that information to the content provider concerned.
Poleg tega bi v nekaterih primerih razlogi javnega reda in javne varnosti ter zlasti razlogi, povezani s preprečevanjem, preiskovanjem, odkrivanjem in pregonom kaznivih dejanj, lahko upravičili, da se navedene informacije ne zagotovijo neposredno zadevnemu ponudniku vsebin.
Therefore, hosting service providers should not do so where a competent authority has made a request to that effect, based on reasons of public policy and public security, for as long as that authority requested in light of those reasons.
Zato ponudniki storitev gostovanja teh ne bi smeli zagotoviti, če je pristojni organ v ta namen vložil zahtevo, ki temelji na razlogih javnega reda in javne varnosti, in sicer vse dokler trajajo navedeni razlogi.
Insofar as this entails a restriction of the right to be informed in respect of the processing of personal data, the relevant conditions set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council should be complied with.
Če to povzroči omejitev pravice do obveščenosti v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov, bi bilo treba upoštevati ustrezne pogoje iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Notice-and-action mechanisms should in no way affect the rights of the parties involved to initiate legal proceedings, in accordance with the applicable law, in respect of any content which is considered to be illegal content or of any measures taken in this regard by hosting service providers.
Mehanizmi prijave in ukrepanja ne bi smeli na noben način vplivati na pravico udeleženih strani, da začnejo sodni postopek v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo, in sicer glede vsebin, ki štejejo za nezakonite, ali kakršnih koli ukrepov, ki jih ponudniki storitev gostovanja sprejmejo v zvezi s tem.
Mechanisms for the out-of-court settlement of disputes arising in this connection can be an important complement to judicial proceedings, especially where they allow for the effective, affordable and swift resolution of such disputes.
Mehanizmi za alternativno reševanje sporov, ki nastanejo v zvezi s tem, so lahko pomembno dopolnilo sodnemu postopku, zlasti kadar omogočajo učinkovito, dostopno in hitro reševanje takih sporov.
Out-of-court settlements should therefore be encouraged, provided that the relevant mechanisms meet certain standards, notably in terms of procedural fairness, that the parties' access to court remains unaffected and that abuse is avoided.
Alternativno reševanje sporov bi bilo zato treba spodbujati, pod pogojem, da zadevni mehanizmi izpolnjujejo določene standarde, zlasti kar zadeva postopkovno pravičnost, da dostop strank do sodišča ostane neokrnjen in da se preprečijo zlorabe.
In order to better assess the effectiveness of notice-and-action mechanisms and other activities of hosting service providers in respect of content considered to be illegal content and to ensure accountability, there should be transparency vis-à-vis the general public.
Da bi lahko bolje ocenili učinkovitost mehanizmov prijave in ukrepanja ter drugih dejavnosti ponudnikov storitev gostovanja v zvezi z vsebinami, ki štejejo za nezakonite, in da bi zagotovili odgovornost, bi bilo treba zagotoviti preglednost v odnosu do širše javnosti.
Hosting service providers should therefore regularly publish reports about those mechanisms and other activities, which should be sufficiently complete and detailed to allow for an adequate insight.
Ponudniki storitev gostovanja bi zato morali redno objavljati poročila o navedenih mehanizmih in drugih dejavnosti, ki bi morala biti dovolj popolna in natančna, da omogočajo ustrezen vpogled.
They should also provide for clarity ex ante, in their terms of service, on their policies on the removal or disabling of access to any content that they store, including illegal content.
Prav tako bi morali predhodno zagotoviti jasnost v svojih pogojih izvajanja storitev in v svojih politikah glede odstranitve kakršnih koli vsebin, ki jih hranijo, vključno z nezakonitimi vsebinami, ali glede onemogočanja dostopa do njih.
In addition to notice-and-action mechanisms, proportionate and specific proactive measures taken voluntarily by hosting service providers, including by using automated means in certain cases, can also be an important element in tackling illegal content online, without prejudice to Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31/EC.
Poleg mehanizmov prijave in ukrepanja so lahko sorazmerni in posebni proaktivni ukrepi, ki jih prostovoljno sprejmejo ponudniki storitev gostovanja, vključno z uporabo avtomatiziranih sredstev v nekaterih primerih, tudi pomemben element v boju proti nezakonitim spletnim vsebinam, brez poseganja v člen 15(1) Direktive 2000/31/ES.
In connection to such proactive measures, account should be taken of the situation of hosting service providers which, because of their size or the scale on which they operate, have only limited resources and expertise and of the need for effective and appropriate safeguards accompanying such measures.
V zvezi s takšnimi proaktivnimi ukrepi bi bilo treba upoštevati položaj ponudnikov storitev gostovanja, ki imajo zaradi svoje velikosti ali obsega delovanja omejene vire in strokovno znanje, in potrebo po učinkovitih in ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepih, ki spremljajo take ukrepe.
It can, in particular, be appropriate to take such proactive measures where the illegal character of the content has already been established or where the type of content is such that contextualisation is not essential.
Še zlasti je lahko sprejetje takšnih proaktivnih ukrepov primerno, če je nezakonitost vsebin že bila ugotovljena, ali kadar je vrsta vsebin takšna, da njihova umeščenost v kontekst ni bistvena.
It can also depend on the nature, scale and purpose of the envisaged measures, the type of content at issue, on whether the content has been notified by law enforcement authorities or Europol and on whether action had already been taken in respect of the content because it is considered to be illegal content.
To je lahko odvisno tudi od narave, obsega in cilja predvidenih ukrepov, vrste zadevnih vsebin, od tega, ali so vsebine prijavili organi pregona ali Europol, in od tega, ali so v zvezi z vsebinami že bili sprejeti ukrepi, ker so vsebine štele za nezakonite.
With regard to child sexual abuse material in particular, hosting service providers should take proactive measures to detect and prevent the dissemination of such material, in line with the commitments undertaken in the context of the Global Alliance against Child Sexual Abuse Online.
Ponudniki storitev gostovanja bi morali zlasti v zvezi s posnetki spolnih zlorab otrok sprejeti proaktivne ukrepe za odkrivanje in preprečevanje razširjanja takšnih posnetkov, v skladu z zavezami, ki so jih sprejeli v okviru svetovnega zavezništva proti spolni zlorabi otrok na internetu.
In this context, in its Communication of 28 September 2017 on tackling illegal content online, the Commission has set out its view that taking such voluntary proactive measures does not automatically lead to the hosting service provider concerned losing the benefit of the liability exemption provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 28. septembra 2017 o boju proti nezakonitim spletnim vsebinam določila svoje stališče, da takšni prostovoljni proaktivni ukrepi zadevnega ponudnika storitev gostovanja ne vodijo samodejno do izgube možnosti uporabe izjeme glede odgovornosti iz člena 14 Direktive 2000/31/ES.
It is essential that any measures to tackle illegal content online are subject to effective and appropriate safeguards aimed at ensuring that hosting service providers act in a diligent and proportionate manner when setting and enforcing their policies in respect of any content that they store, including illegal content, so as to ensure, in particular, that users can freely receive and impart information online in compliance with the applicable law.
Bistveno je, da za vse ukrepe za boj proti nezakonitim spletnim vsebinam veljajo učinkoviti in ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi, katerih cilj je zagotoviti, da ponudniki storitev gostovanja ravnajo skrbno in sorazmerno pri določanju in izvrševanju svojih politik v zvezi z vsebinami, ki jih hranijo, vključno z nezakonitimi vsebinami, s čimer se zlasti zagotovi, da lahko uporabniki svobodno prejemajo in sporočajo informacije na spletu v skladu s pravom, ki se uporablja.
In addition to any safeguards laid down in the applicable law, for instance regarding the protection of personal data, particular safeguards, notably human oversight and verifications, should be provided for and applied where appropriate in relation to the use of automated means, so as to avoid any unintended and erroneous decisions.
Poleg zaščitnih ukrepov, ki so določeni s pravom, ki se uporablja, na primer v zvezi z varstvom osebnih podatkov, bi bilo treba zagotoviti posebne zaščitne ukrepe, zlasti v obliki človeškega nadzora in preverjanja, ki bi se po potrebi uporabili v zvezi z avtomatiziranimi sredstvi, da bi se preprečila vsaka nenamerna ali napačna odločitev.
Smooth, effective and appropriate cooperation between competent authorities and hosting service providers when tackling illegal content online should be ensured.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba neovirano, učinkovito in ustrezno sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi in ponudniki storitev gostovanja pri boju proti nezakonitim spletnim vsebinam.
Such cooperation could benefit from the assistance of Europol where appropriate, for instance when combating terrorism and sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children, child pornography and solicitation of children.
Takšno sodelovanje bi lahko bilo po potrebi deležno pomoči Europola, na primer pri boju proti terorizmu ter spolni zlorabi in spolnemu izkoriščanju otrok, otroški pornografiji in novačenju otrok.
In order to facilitate such cooperation, Member States and hosting service providers should designate points of contacts, and procedures should be established for the processing of notices submitted by those authorities as a matter of priority and with an appropriate degree of confidence as regards their accuracy, taking account of the particular expertise and responsibilities of those authorities.
Da bi olajšali takšno sodelovanje, bi morali države članice in ponudniki storitev gostovanja imenovati kontaktne točke in treba bi bilo vzpostaviti postopke za obdelavo prijav, ki jih predložijo navedeni organi, in sicer prednostno in s primerno stopnjo zaupanja glede njihove pravilnosti, upoštevajoč posebno strokovno znanje in pristojnosti navedenih organov.
In order to effectively tackle certain particularly serious criminal offences, such as offences specified in Directive (EU) 2017/541 and Directive 2011/93/EU, which might come to the attention of hosting service providers when carrying out their activities, Member States should be encouraged to make use of the possibility set out in Article 15(2) of Directive 2000/31/EC to establish in law reporting obligations, in compliance with the applicable law, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Da bi učinkovito obravnavali nekatera posebno huda kazniva dejanja, kot so kazniva dejanja, določena v Direktivi (EU) 2017/541 in Direktivi 2011/93/EU, za katera bi lahko ponudniki storitev gostovanja izvedeli pri opravljanju svoje dejavnosti, bi bilo treba države članice spodbujati k uporabi možnosti iz člena 15(2) Direktive 2000/31/ES, naj zakonsko določijo obveznost poročanja v skladu s pravom, ki se uporablja, zlasti Uredbo (EU) 2016/679.
In addition to competent authorities, certain individuals or entities, including non-governmental organisations and trade associations, might also have particular expertise and wish to take on, on a voluntary basis, certain responsibilities related to tackling illegal content online.
Poleg pristojnih organov imajo nekateri posamezniki ali subjekti, vključno z nevladnimi organizacijami in sindikati, lahko tudi posebno strokovno znanje in željo po prostovoljnem prevzemu nekaterih obveznosti v zvezi z bojem proti nezakonitim spletnim vsebinam.
In light of their added-value and the sometimes high numbers of notices involved, cooperation between such trusted flaggers and hosting service providers should be encouraged, in particular by treating the notices that they submit also as a matter of priority and with an appropriate degree of confidence as regards their accuracy.
Glede na njihovo dodano vrednost in včasih veliko število prijav, bi bilo treba spodbujati sodelovanje med takšnimi zaupanja vrednimi prijavitelji in ponudniki storitev gostovanja, zlasti s prednostno obravnavo prijav, ki jih predložijo, in s primerno stopnjo zaupanja glede njihove pravilnosti.
However, in accordance with their particular status, that cooperation should only be open to individuals and entities which respect the values on which the Union is founded as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and meet certain appropriate conditions, which should moreover be clear and objective and be made publicly available.
Vendar pa bi glede na njihov posebni status takšno sodelovanje moralo biti odprto le za posameznike in subjekte, ki spoštujejo vrednote, na katerih temelji Unija, kot so določene v členu 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, in ki izpolnjujejo posamezne ustrezne pogoje, ki bi morali biti tudi jasni, objektivni in javno dostopni.
Combating illegal content online requires a holistic approach, as such content often migrates easily from one hosting service provider to another and tends to exploit the weakest links in the chain.
Boj proti nezakonitim spletnim vsebinam zahteva celosten pristop, saj takšne vsebine pogosto zlahka prehajajo od enega ponudnika storitev gostovanja k drugemu in pogosto izkoriščajo najšibkejši člen v verigi.
Cooperation, consisting in particular of the sharing on a voluntary basis of experiences, technological solutions and best practices, is therefore essential.
Sodelovanje, ki obsega zlasti prostovoljno izmenjavo izkušenj, tehnoloških rešitev in dobrih praks, je zato bistvenega pomena.
Such cooperation is particularly important in respect of hosting service providers which, because of their size or the scale on which they operate, have only limited resources and expertise.
Takšno sodelovanje je še posebej pomembno za ponudnike storitev gostovanja, ki imajo zaradi svoje velikosti ali obsega delovanja omejene vire in strokovno znanje.
Terrorism involves the unlawful and indiscriminate use of violence and intimidation against citizens.
Terorizem vključuje nezakonito in neselektivno uporabo nasilja in ustrahovanja državljanov.
Terrorists have become increasingly reliant on the internet to disseminate terrorist propaganda, often deploying sophisticated methods to ensure swift and broad dissemination.
Teroristi so pri razširjanju teroristične propagande vedno bolj odvisni od spleta in pogosto uporabljajo izpopolnjene metode za hitro in široko razširjanje.
Whilst progress has been made, especially in the context of the EU Internet Forum, there remains an urgent need for a swifter and more effective response to terrorist content online, in addition to the need for hosting service providers participating in the EU Internet Forum to fully live up to their commitments concerning effective and comprehensive reporting.
Čeprav je bil dosežen napredek, zlasti v okviru internetnega foruma EU, še vedno obstaja nujna potreba po zagotovitvi hitrejšega in učinkovitejšega odziva na teroristične spletne vsebine, in sicer poleg potrebe po sodelovanju ponudnikov storitev gostovanja v okviru internetnega foruma EU, da bi v celoti izpolnjevali svoje zaveze glede učinkovitega in celovitega poročanja.
In light of the particularities related to tackling terrorist content online, the recommendations relating to tackling illegal content generally should be complemented by certain recommendations which specifically relate to tackling terrorist content online, building on and consolidating efforts undertaken in the framework of the EU Internet Forum.
Ob upoštevanju posebnosti, povezanih z bojem proti terorističnim spletnim vsebinam, bi morala biti priporočila v zvezi z bojem proti nezakonitim vsebinam na splošno dopolnjena z nekaterimi priporočili, ki so še posebej povezana z bojem proti terorističnim spletnim vsebinam, ki bi temeljila na prizadevanjih v okviru internetnega foruma EU in jih krepila.