natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this regard, the manufacturer explained that the fact that the machine cage contained a second smaller door into each cell with no interlock that stopped the machine was not contrary to Directive 2006/42/EC because the rear division guards required very infrequent access and fixed guards provided enough safety in this case.
V zvezi s tem je proizvajalec pojasnil, da dejstvo, da ima kletka naprave še ena manjša vrata za vsako celico brez zaklepa, ki bi napravo ustavila, ni bilo v nasprotju z Direktivo 2006/42/ES, ker zadnja razdelilna varovala redkokdaj zahtevajo dostop, tako da v tem primeru pritrjena varovala zagotavljajo dovolj visoko stopnjo varnosti.
The manufacturer indicated that based on this justification and on EN 953, a fixed guard was selected.
Proizvajalec je navedel, da je bilo na podlagi te utemeljitve in standarda EN 953 izbrano pritrjeno varovalo.
It did not address the absence of the interlocking mechanism.
Neobstoja zapornega mehanizma proizvajalec ni omenjal.
The Commission considers that the risk arising from moving parts was not addressed because the locking mechanism did not stop the machine when the worker approached it.
Komisija meni, da tveganje zaradi premičnih delov ni bilo obravnavano, ker zaklepni mehanizem naprave ni ustavil, ko se ji je delavec približal.
Thus, on the basis of the above arguments and taking into account the study confirming those arguments, it can be concluded that the EHSR set out in Sections 1.3.8 and 1.4 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC have not been fulfilled as regards the pinsetter machine.
Ob upoštevanju zgornjih argumentov in študije, ki potrjuje navedene argumente, je mogoče sklepati, da niso bile izpolnjene bistvene zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz oddelka 1.3.8 in 1.4 Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES v zvezi z napravo za postavljanje kegljev.
Sweden also indicated that the protective cap over the ball return mechanism did not meet the ESHR on fixed guards set out in Section 1.4.2.1 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC as it was not fixed in any way and it did not meet the requirements for interlocking guards set out in Section 1.4.2.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC since there was no interlocking mechanism.
Švedska je tudi navedla, da zaščitni pokrov na mehanizmu za vračanje krogel ni bil v skladu z bistvenimi zdravstvenimi in varnostnimi zahtevami v zvezi s pritrjenimi varovali iz oddelka 1.4.2.1 Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES, saj ni bilo pritrjeno na noben način in ni izpolnjevalo zahtev za zaklepna varovala iz oddelka 1.4.2.2 Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES, ker je zaklepni mehanizem manjkal.
Sweden referred also in this case to EN 953:1997+A1:2009 to reinforce its justification on the manufacturer's lack of compliance with EHSRs 1.4.2.1 and 1.4.2.2.
Švedska se tudi v tem primeru sklicuje na standard EN 953:1997+A1:2009, da bi okrepila svojo utemeljitev proizvajalčeve neskladnosti z bistvenimi zdravstvenimi in varstvenimi zahtevami iz oddelkov 1.4.2.1 in 1.4.2.2.
However, the manufacturer stated that the access into the ball return cover was required far less frequently than once per shift and limited its explanations to a statement that a fixed guard was recommended by the standards.
Vendar je proizvajalec navedel, da je bil dostop do pokrova za mehanizem za vračanje krogel potreben veliko manj pogosto kot enkrat na izmeno ter omejil svoje razlage na izjavo, da je bilo pritrjeno varovalo uporabljeno na podlagi standardov.
In its view, there was no need to take the actions required by Sweden.
Proizvajalec meni, da ukrepi, ki jih je zahtevala Švedska, niso bili potrebni.
The Commission considers that the risk arising from moving parts was not addressed in the protective cap over the ball return mechanism because, in addition to the absence of interlocking mechanisms, the fixed guards were not fixed.
Komisija meni, da tveganje, ki izhaja iz premikajočih se delov, ni bilo obravnavano pri zaščitnem pokrovu za mehanizem za vračanje krogel, saj pritrjenih varoval ni bilo, manjkal pa je tudi zaklepni mehanizem.
Thus, on the basis of the above arguments and taking into account the study confirming those arguments, it can be concluded that the EHSR set out in Sections 1.4.2.1 and 1.4.2.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC have not been fulfilled as regards the pinsetter machine.
Ob upoštevanju zgornjih argumentov in ob upoštevanju študije, ki potrjuje navedene argumente, je mogoče sklepati, da niso bile izpolnjene bistvene zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz oddelkov 1.4.2.1 in 1.4.2.2 Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES v zvezi z napravo za postavljanje kegljev.
As regards the EHSR set out in Sections 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1 and 1.7.4.2, regarding the requirements on instructions, Sweden informed that a posted picture on the pinsetter machine and the supplementary kit was supposed to show where the guards were located, but it did not correspond to where they were actually located on the machine.
Kar zadeva bistvene zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz oddelkov 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1 in 1.7.4.2 v zvezi z zahtevami glede navodil, je Švedska sporočila, da bi morala prilepljena slika na napravi za postavljanje kegljev in dodatni opremi prikazovati, kje se nahajajo varovala, vendar se slika ni ujemala z dejansko lokacijo teh varoval na napravi.
As for the user instructions, Sweden said that there were no instructions for use corresponding to the machines delivered and which should cover the various operations to be performed.
Kar zadeva navodila za uporabo, je Švedska izjavila, da niso ustrezala dostavljenim napravam, čeprav bi morala zajemati različne postopke, ki jih je treba izvesti.
Regarding the absence of operating and instructions manual, the manufacturer stated that translated manuals were supplied with the machines so it could be possible that the manuals were misplaced at the inspected bowling centre.
Kar zadeva neobstoj priročnika in navodil za uporabo, je proizvajalec navedel, da so bili napravam priloženi prevedeni priročniki, tako da je mogoče, da so se priročniki izgubili v kegljaškem centru, ki se je pregledoval.
Labels having no impact on safety functions were not translated.
Oznake, ki ne vplivajo na varnostne funkcije, niso bile prevedene.
Furthermore, the machine labels and manuals observed by the inspectors may not have matched the machine due to manufacturer's accommodation of specific demands from regional inspectors and the time constraints to adapt to those demands.
Poleg tega se oznake in priročniki, ki so jih opazili inšpektorji, morda niso ujemali z napravo, ker se je proizvajalec prilagodil posebnim zahtevam regionalnih inšpektorjev in zaradi časovnih omejitev za prilagoditev tem zahtevam.
The Commission considers, on the basis of the above arguments and taking into account the study confirming those arguments, that the EHSR set out in Sections 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1 and 1.7.4.2 Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC have not been fulfilled as regards the pinsetter machine and the supplementary kit.
Komisija torej meni, da na podlagi zgornjih argumentov in ob upoštevanju študije, ki potrjuje navedene argumente, niso bile izpolnjene bistvene zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz oddelkov 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1 in 1.7.4.2 Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES v zvezi z napravo za postavljanje kegljev in dodatno opremo.
EHSR set out in Section 1.1.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC regarding principles of safety integration requires that machinery must be designed and constructed to prevent putting persons at risk when operating the machinery under the conditions foreseen but also taking into account any reasonably foreseeable misuse.
Bistvene zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz oddelka 1.1.2 Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES v zvezi z načeli vključevanja varnosti zahtevajo, da morajo biti stroji načrtovani in izdelani brez izpostavljanja oseb tveganju pri predvideni uporabi stroja ter se mora upoštevati vsaka njegova razumno predvidljiva napačna uporaba.
Sweden indicated that the mounting brackets used for the safety interlocks were fastened with standard screws, which are easy to remove with standard tools, contrary to the principle of safety integration.
Švedska je navedla, da so bili pritrdilni nosilci, ki se uporabljajo za varnostne zapore, pritrjeni s standardnimi vijaki, ki se z lahkoto odstranijo s standardnim orodjem, kar je v nasprotju z načelom vključevanja varnosti.
This entails a risk of foreseeable misuse to defeat the mounting brackets instead using the interlocked doors.
To pomeni nevarnost predvidljive zlorabe s tem, da se pritrdilni nosilci onesposobijo, namesto da bi se uporabila vrata z zaklepnim mehanizmom.
The manufacturer stated that the reason was that the interlocked doors provide reasonable access that reduces the operator's motivation to defeat the interlocks when making extensive maintenance.
Proizvajalec je navedel, da je to zato, ker zaklepna vrata zagotavljajo primeren dostop, kar zmanjšuje motivacijo upravljavca, da onesposobi zaklepne mehanizme, ko opravlja obsežna vzdrževalna dela.
Standard screws would reduce the risk of permanent damage to the guarding system or permanent removal of the guards.
Standardni vijaki bi zmanjšali tveganje trajne poškodbe sistema varovanja ali trajno odstranitev varoval.
Furthermore, Sweden explained that the fixed guards were mounted with quick-release fasteners, which entailed a risk that someone would open the fixed guard and use it for access instead of using the interlocked door.
Poleg tega je Švedska pojasnila, da se pri pritrjenih varovalih uporabljajo pritrdilni elementi s hitro sprostitvijo, kar pomeni tveganje, da bi nekdo odprl pritrjeno varovalo in ga uporabil za dostop, namesto da bi uporabil zaklepna vrata.
Sweden added that where the risk assessment shows that there should be a fixed guard, it must not be designed in such a way that it is an attractive option to access the machine by opening the fixed guard rather than by using the locked gate.
Švedska je dodala, da kadar ocena tveganja pokaže, da bi se moralo uporabiti pritrjeno varovalo, to ne sme biti zasnovano tako, da bi pomenilo privlačnejši način dostopanja do naprave, tj. z odpiranjem pritrjenega varovala namesto z uporabo zaklenjenih vrat.
The manufacturer justified the use of quick-release fasteners to diminish the workers' motivation to defeat the fixed guards.
Proizvajalec je uporabil pritrdilne elemente s hitrim sproščanjem zato, da se zmanjša motivacija delavcev, da bi onesposobili pritrjena varovala.
In its EC declaration of conformity, the manufacturer referred to the harmonised standard EN 1088:1995+A1:2007 but did not provide in the technical file a link between the reference of the harmonised standard and the respective EHSR as required by Annex VII to Directive 2006/42/EC.
Proizvajalec se je v svoji izjavi ES o skladnosti skliceval na harmonizirani standard EN 1088:1995+A1:2007, vendar v tehnični dokumentaciji ni navedel povezave med sklicem na harmonizirani standard in ustreznimi bistvenimi zdravstvenimi in varnostnimi zahtevami, kot je to zahtevano v Prilogi VII k Direktivi 2006/42/ES.
Despite this deficiency, Sweden linked the reference of that harmonised standard with the EHSR set out in Section 1.1.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC.
Ne glede na to pomanjkljivost, je Švedska povezala sklic tega harmoniziranega standarda z bistvenimi zdravstvenimi in varnostnimi zahtevami iz oddelka 1.1.2 Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES.
Harmonised standard EN 1088+A2:2008 lays down safety technical requirements on machinery interlocking devices associated with guards and the principles for design and selection.
Harmonizirani standard EN 1088+A2:2008 določa varnostne tehnične zahteve za zaporne naprave, povezane z varovali ter načela za načrtovanje in izbiro.
Sweden refers to this standard to reinforce its justification on the manufacturer's lack of compliance with EHSRs 1.1.2.
Švedska se sklicuje na ta standard, da bi okrepila svojo utemeljitev glede proizvajalčeve neskladnosti z bistvenimi zdravstvenimi iz varnostnimi zahtevami iz oddelka 1.1.2.
The manufacturer indicated that Section 5.7.1 Note 4 of the standard states that avoiding ‘defeat in a reasonably foreseeable manner’ needs to take into account the characteristics of the specific application and therefore based on the risk assessment.
Proizvajalec je izjavil, da opomba 4 oddelka 5.7.1 omenjenega standarda navaja, da se morajo pri preprečevanju „onesposobitve na razumno predvidljiv način“ upoštevati značilnosti posamezne uporabe, torej na osnovi ocene tveganja.
According to the manufacturer, the interlocked doors provide reasonable access that reduces the operator's motivation to defeat the interlocks.
Po navedbah proizvajalca vrata z zaporno napravo zagotavljajo primeren dostop, ki zmanjšuje motivacijo upravljavca, da bi onesposobil zaporne naprave.
The Commission considers that the mounting brackets and the fixed guards could be easily removed with standard tools, which entailed a reasonably foreseeable misuse of accessing the machine by bypassing the locked gates.
Komisija meni, da bi se pritrdilni nosilci in pritrjena varovala lahko zlahka odstranili s standardnim orodjem, kar bi pomenilo razumno predvidljivo zlorabo dostopa do naprave tako, da se zaklenjena vrata ne uporabijo.
Examination of the justification provided by Sweden with respect to the safeguard measure, the independent study confirming the conclusions made by Sweden and the observations communicated by the manufacturer, confirm that the pinsetter machine did not comply with the ESHRs set out in Sections 1.1.2, 1.1.6, 1.2.2, 1.3.8, 1.4, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.7.1, 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1, 1.7.4.2 of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC and the supplementary kit did not comply with the ESHRs set out in Sections 1.1.2, 1.2.2, 1.3.8, 1.4, 1.7.1, 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1 and 1.7.4.2 at the time that Sweden notified the measures to the Commission in December 2013.
Zato je treba zaščitne ukrepe, ki jih je sprejela Švedska, šteti za upravičene –
Those deficiencies are liable to compromise the health and safety of persons.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Therefore, the safeguard measures taken by Sweden should be considered as justified,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Ukrepi, ki jih je sprejela Švedska in ki prepovedujejo dajanje na trg naprave za postavljanje kegljev znamke Brunswick GSX in delov pripadajoče dodatne opreme imenovane „Advanced Guards“ (napredna varovala) ter od proizvajalca zahtevajo, da naprave, ki so že bile dane na trg, umakne, so upravičeni.
The measures taken by Sweden, prohibiting the placing on the market of the Brunswick GSX pinsetter machine and its supplementary kit of parts ‘Advanced Guards’ and requiring the manufacturer to withdraw the machines already placed on the market, are justified.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice.
Article 2
V Bruslju, 10. decembra 2018
For the Commission
UL L 157, 9.6.2006, str. 24.
Elżbieta Bieńkowska
Uredba (ES) št. 765/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o določitvi zahtev za akreditacijo in nadzor trga v zvezi s trženjem proizvodov ter razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 339/93 (UL L 218, 13.8.2008, str. 30).
Member of the Commission
Poročilo o skladnosti „Skladnost naprav za postavljanje kegljev z direktivo o strojih“, 8. maj 2017.
OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24.
Preiskava utemeljitve, ki jo je predložila Švedska glede zaščitnega ukrepa, neodvisna študija, ki je potrdila ugotovitve Švedske, in pripombe, ki jih je sporočil proizvajalec, potrjujejo, da naprava za postavljanje kegljev ni bila v skladu z bistvenimi zdravstvenimi in varnostnimi zahtevami iz oddelkov 1.1.2, 1.1.6, 1.2.2, 1.3.8, 1.4, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.7.1, 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1 in 1.7.4.2 Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES ter da dodatna oprema ni bila v skladu z bistvenimi zdravstvenimi in varnostnimi zahtevami iz oddelkov 1.1.2, 1.2.2, 1.3.8, 1.4, 1.7.1, 1.7.4, 1.7.4.1 in 1.7.4.2 v času, ko je Švedska decembra 2013 uradno obvestila Komisijo o ukrepih.
Commission Decision (EU) 2018/1961
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2018/1961
of 11 December 2018
z dne 11. decembra 2018
laying down internal rules concerning the provision of information to data subjects and the restriction of certain of their rights in the context of the processing of personal data for the purpose of internal audit activities
o določitvi notranjih pravil glede zagotavljanja informacij posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, in omejevanjem nekaterih njihovih pravic za namen dejavnosti notranje revizije
THE COMMISSION,
KOMISIJA JE –
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 249(1),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 249(1) Pogodbe,
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council requires each Union institution to establish an internal audit function which shall be performed in compliance with the relevant international standards.
Uredba (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta od vseh institucij Unije zahteva, da vzpostavijo funkcijo notranje revizije, ki se izvaja v skladu z ustreznimi mednarodnimi standardi.
Internal audit activities are also carried out by the Service in Union decentralised agencies and other autonomous bodies receiving contributions from the Union budget.
V zvezi s tem je Služba popolnoma neodvisna ter ima popoln in neomejen dostop do vseh informacij, ki jih potrebuje pri izvajanju svojih dejavnostih notranje revizije v zvezi z vsemi dejavnostmi in oddelki zadevne institucije Unije.
The Service conducts internal audit activities in accordance with Articles 117 to 123 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and its mission charter.
Služba v skladu s členi 117 do 123 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 svetuje drugim službam Komisije, izvajalskim agencijam ter decentraliziranim agencijam Unije in drugim avtonomnim organom, ki prejemajo prispevke iz proračuna Unije, o tem, kako obravnavati tveganja, tj. kakršne koli dogodke ali zadeve, ki bi lahko nastopili in negativno vplivali na doseganje političnih, strateških in operativnih ciljev Komisije, tako, da izdaja neodvisna mnenja o kakovosti upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov ter priporočila za izboljšanje pogojev izvajanja postopkov in spodbujanje dobrega finančnega poslovodenja.
In this respect, the Service has complete independence and full and unlimited access to all information required in the conduct of its internal audit activities in relation to all the activities and departments of the Union institution concerned.
Zato se Služba pri dejavnostih notranje revizije običajno ne osredotoča na fizične osebe kot take.
The Service advises other Commission departments, executive agencies, as well as Union decentralised agencies and other autonomous bodies receiving contributions from the Union budget on how to deal with risks, i.e. any event or issue that could occur and adversely impact the achievement of the Commission's political, strategic and operational objective, by issuing independent opinions on the quality of management and control systems and by issuing recommendations for improving the conditions of implementation of operations and promoting sound financial management, in accordance with Articles 117 to 123 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046.
Vendar se pri svojih dejavnostih ne more izogniti obdelovanju osebnih podatkov v smislu člena 3(1) Uredbe (EU) 2018/1725 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Therefore, the internal audit activities of the Service do not typically target natural persons as such.
Dejavnosti notranje revizije, ki jih izvaja Služba, vključujejo ocenjevanje ustreznosti in uspešnosti notranjih sistemov za poslovodenje in poslovanje služb pri izvajanju politik, programov in ukrepov, ocenjevanje učinkovitosti in uspešnosti sistemov notranje kontrole in revizije, ki se uporabljajo za posamezno operacijo izvrševanja proračuna.
Nevertheless, during the course of its activities, personal data within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council are inevitably processed.
Zato prispevajo k zaščiti pomembnih gospodarskih in finančnih interesov Unije in držav članic.
The internal audit activities carried out by the Service involve assessing the suitability and effectiveness of internal management systems and the performance of departments in implementing policies, programmes and actions, the efficiency and effectiveness of the internal control and audit systems applicable to each budget implementation operation.
Služba je upravljavec postopkov obdelave, ki jih izvaja v skladu s členom 118 in členom 119(2) finančne uredbe.
Therefore, they contribute to the safeguarding of important economic and financial interests of the Union and of the Member States.
Dejavnosti notranje revizije, ki se izvajajo v Komisiji in njenih izvajalskih agencijah ter v decentraliziranih agencijah Unije in drugih avtonomnih organih, se razlikujejo po obliki in vsebini ter segajo od poslov dajanja zagotovila (vključno z ocenami tveganja) in svetovalnih poslov do pregledov z omejenim revizijskim obsegom in poslov porevizijskega ukrepanja.
The Service is a controller for the processing operations it carries out in accordance with Articles 118 and 119(2) of the Financial Regulation.
Odbor za spremljanje poteka revizij je v skladu z listino o delu, posodobljeno 21. novembra 2018 (C(2018) 7707) svetovalno telo, ki pomaga Komisiji pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti iz Pogodb in drugih zakonskih instrumentov [Uredba (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046] tako, da zagotavlja neodvisnost Službe za notranjo revizijo, spremlja kakovost notranjerevizijsko delo in zagotavlja, da službe Komisije ustrezno upoštevajo priporočila notranjih in zunanjih revizij ter da se nanje ustrezno odzovejo z nadaljnjimi ukrepi.
The internal audit activities performed in the Commission and its executive agencies, and in the Union decentralised agencies and other autonomous bodies vary in form and content, ranging from assurance (including risk assessments) and consulting engagements, to reviews with a limited scope and follow-up engagements.
Odbor za spremljanje poteka revizij tako prispeva k splošnemu nadaljnjemu izboljšanju uspešnosti in učinkovitosti Komisije pri doseganju njenih ciljev ter olajšuje nadzor kolegija nad praksami Komisije na področju upravljanja, obvladovanja tveganja in notranje kontrole.
The Audit Progress Committee (APC), in accordance with its Mission Charter updated on 21 November 2018 (C(2018)7707), is an advisory body that assists the Commission in fulfilling its obligations under the Treaties and other statutory instruments [Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046] by ensuring the independence of the Internal Audit Service, by monitoring the quality of internal audit work, and by ensuring that internal and external audit recommendations are properly taken into account by the Commission services and that they receive appropriate follow-up.
Odbor za spremljanje poteka revizij je upravljavec postopkov obdelave, ki jih izvaja v skladu s členom 123 finančne uredbe.
In this way, the APC contributes to the overall further improvement of the Commission's effectiveness and efficiency in achieving its goals and facilitates the College's oversight of the Commission's governance, risk management, and internal control practices.
Komisija za namene svojih dejavnosti iz členov 118 in 119(2) Uredbe (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 ne glede na to, ali ukrepa na lastno pobudo ali na podlagi prejetih prispevkov, obdeluje osebne podatke, ki jih je pridobila ali prejela od pravnih oseb, fizičnih oseb, držav članic ter mednarodnih organov in organizacij.
The APC is a controller for the processing operation(s) it carries out in accordance with Article 123 of the Financial Regulation.
Med takšnimi dejavnostmi notranje revizije lahko Služba obdeluje tudi osebne podatke, ki so bili pridobljeni ali prejeti iz javno dostopnih virov, in sicer iz anonimnih ali iz opredeljenih virov, katerih identiteto je treba zaščititi.