natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Given the large amounts of data that public authorities and bodies governed by public law handle, it is of the utmost importance that they lead by example by taking up data processing services and that they refrain from making data localisation restrictions when they make use of data processing services.
Glede na velike količine podatkov, ki jih obdelujejo javni organi in osebe javnega prava, je ključnega pomena, da dajejo zgled z uporabo storitev obdelave podatkov in ne določajo omejitev za lokalizacijo podatkov, kadar uporabljajo storitev obdelave podatkov.
Therefore, public authorities and bodies governed by public law should be covered by this Regulation.
Zato bi morala ta uredba zajemati tudi javne organe in osebe javnega prava.
In this regard, the principle of the free flow of non-personal data for which this Regulation provides should apply also to general and consistent administrative practices and to other data localisation requirements in the field of public procurement, without prejudice to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.
V zvezi s tem bi se moralo načelo prostega pretoka neosebnih podatkov iz te uredbe uporabljati tudi za splošne in dosledne administrativne prakse in za druge zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov na področju javnega naročanja, brez poseganja v Direktivo 2014/24/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
As in the case of Directive 2014/24/EU, this Regulation is without prejudice to laws, regulations, and administrative provisions which relate to the internal organisation of Member States and that allocate, among public authorities and bodies governed by public law, powers and responsibilities for the processing of data without contractual remuneration of private parties, as well as the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of Member States that provide for the implementation of those powers and responsibilities.
Kot v primeru Direktive 2014/24/EU, ta uredba ne posega v zakone in druge predpise v zvezi z notranjo organizacijo držav članic, ki določajo prenos pristojnosti in pooblastil za obdelavo podatkov brez pogodbenih plačil zasebnih strank na javne organe in osebe javnega prava, kot tudi ne v zakone in druge predpise držav članic, ki določajo izvajanje teh pooblastil in pristojnosti.
While public authorities and bodies governed by public law are encouraged to consider the economic and other benefits of outsourcing to external service providers, they might have legitimate reasons to choose self-provisioning of services or insourcing.
Medtem ko se javne organe in osebe javnega prava spodbuja, naj preučijo gospodarske in druge prednosti oddajanja v zunanje izvajanje zunanjim ponudnikom storitev, bi ti lahko imeli legitimne razloge za izbiro samozagotavljanja storitev ali notranjega izvajanja.
Consequently, nothing in this Regulation obliges Member States to contract out or externalise the provision of services that they wish to provide themselves or to organise by means other than public contracts.
Zato nič v tej uredbi ne obvezuje držav članic, da sklepajo pogodbe z zunanjimi izvajalci ali da nanje prenesejo opravljanje storitev, ki jih želijo opravljati sami ali jih organizirati na drug način kot pa z javnimi naročili.
This Regulation should apply to natural or legal persons who provide data processing services to users residing or having an establishment in the Union, including those who provide data processing services in the Union without an establishment in the Union.
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati za fizične ali pravne osebe, ki ponujajo storitve obdelave podatkov uporabnikom, ki prebivajo ali imajo sedež v Uniji, vključno s tistimi, ki ponujajo storitve obdelave podatkov v Uniji in nimajo sedeža v Uniji.
This Regulation should therefore not apply to data processing services taking place outside the Union and to data localisation requirements relating to such data.
Ta uredba se zato ne bi smela uporabljati za storitve obdelave podatkov, ki potekajo zunaj Unije, in za zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov, ki zadevajo te podatke.
This Regulation does not lay down rules relating to the determination of applicable law in commercial matters and is therefore without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Ta uredba ne določa pravil v zvezi z določitvijo prava, ki se uporablja v gospodarskih zadevah, in zato ne posega v Uredbo (ES) št. 593/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
In particular, to the extent that the law applicable to a contract has not been chosen in accordance with that Regulation, a contract for the provision of services is, in principle, governed by the law of the country of the service provider's habitual residence.
Zlasti za pogodbo o opravljanju storitev načeloma velja pravo države, v kateri ima ponudnik storitev običajno prebivališče, če pravo, ki se uporablja za pogodbo, ni bilo izbrano v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
This Regulation should apply to data processing in the broadest sense, encompassing the usage of all types of IT systems, whether located on the premises of the user or outsourced to a service provider.
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati za obdelavo podatkov v najširšem smislu ter vključevati uporabo vseh vrst informacijskih sistemov, ne glede na to, ali se nahajajo v prostorih uporabnika ali se oddajo v zunanje izvajanje ponudniku storitev.
It should cover data processing of different levels of intensity, from data storage (Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)) to the processing of data on platforms (Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS)) or in applications (Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)).
Zajemati bi morala obdelavo podatkov na različnih ravneh intenzivnosti, od shranjevanja podatkov (infrastruktura kot storitev (IaaS)) do obdelave podatkov na platformah (platforma kot storitev (PaaS)) ali v aplikacijah (programska oprema kot storitev (SaaS)).
Data localisation requirements represent a clear barrier to the free provision of data processing services across the Union and to the internal market.
Zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov nedvomno ovirajo prosto opravljanje storitev obdelave podatkov v Uniji in predstavljajo ovire delovanja notranjega trga.
As such, they should be banned unless they are justified on grounds of public security, as defined by Union law, in particular within the meaning of Article 52 TFEU, and satisfy the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 5 TEU.
Zato bi jih bilo kot take treba prepovedati, razen če so utemeljene iz razlogov javne varnosti, kot je opredeljeno s pravom Unije, zlasti v smislu člena 52 PDEU, in upoštevajo načelo sorazmernosti iz člena 5 PEU.
In order to give effect to the principle of free flow of non-personal data across borders, to ensure the swift removal of existing data localisation requirements and to enable, for operational reasons, the processing of data in multiple locations across the Union, and since this Regulation provides for measures to ensure data availability for regulatory control purposes, Member States should only be able to invoke public security as a justification for data localisation requirements.
Da bi se uveljavilo načelo prostega pretoka neosebnih podatkov prek meja, zagotovila hitra odprava obstoječih zahtev glede lokalizacije podatkov ter da bi se iz operativnih razlogov omogočila obdelava podatkov na več lokacijah v Uniji in ker ta uredba določa ukrepe za zagotovitev razpoložljivosti podatkov za namene regulativnega nadzora, bi se države članice lahko sklicevale na javno varnost le kot utemeljitev zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov.
The concept of ‘public security’, within the meaning of Article 52 TFEU and as interpreted by the Court of Justice, covers both the internal and external security of a Member State, as well as issues of public safety, in order, in particular, to facilitate the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences.
Pojem „javne varnosti“ v smislu člena 52 PDEU in kot ga razlaga Sodišče, zajema tako notranjo kot zunanjo varnost države članice ter vprašanja varnosti ljudi, zlasti za olajšanje preiskovanja, odkrivanja in pregona kaznivih dejanj.
It presupposes the existence of a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society, such as a threat to the functioning of institutions and essential public services and the survival of the population, as well as the risk of a serious disturbance to foreign relations or the peaceful coexistence of nations, or a risk to military interests.
Predpostavlja obstoj dejanske in dovolj resne grožnje, ki vpliva na enega od temeljnih interesov družbe, kot je ogrožanje delovanja institucij in temeljnih javnih služb ter preživetja prebivalstva, pa tudi tveganje resnih motenj v zunanjih odnosih ali v mirnem sobivanju narodov oziroma grožnjo vojaškim interesom.
In compliance with the principle of proportionality, data localisation requirements that are justified on grounds of public security should be suitable for attaining the objective pursued, and should not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti bi morale biti zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov, ki so utemeljene z razlogi javne varnosti, primerne za uresničitev zastavljenega cilja in ne bi smele presegati tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje tega cilja.
In order to ensure the effective application of the principle of free flow of non-personal data across borders, and to prevent the emergence of new barriers to the smooth functioning of the internal market, Member States should immediately communicate to the Commission any draft act that introduces a new data localisation requirement or modifies an existing data localisation requirement.
Da bi se zagotovila učinkovita uporaba načela prostega pretoka neosebnih podatkov prek meja in preprečilo nastajanje novih ovir za nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga, bi morale države članice Komisijo nemudoma obvestiti o vsakem osnutku akta, ki uvaja novo zahtevo glede lokalizacije podatkov ali spreminja obstoječo zahtevo glede lokalizacije podatkov.
Those draft acts should be submitted and assessed in accordance with Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Te osnutke aktov bi bilo treba predložiti in oceniti v skladu z Direktivo (EU) 2015/1535 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Moreover, in order to eliminate potential existing barriers, during a transitional period of 24 months from the date of application of this Regulation, Member States should carry out a review of existing laws, regulations or administrative provisions of a general nature laying down data localisation requirements and communicate to the Commission any such data localisation requirement that they consider being in compliance with this Regulation, together with a justification for it.
Nadalje, da bi se odpravile morebitne obstoječe ovire, bi morale države članice v prehodnem obdobju 24 mesecev po dnevu začetka uporabe te uredbe pregledati obstoječe zakone in druge splošne predpise, ki določajo zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov, ter Komisiji sporočiti vse tovrstne zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov, za katere menijo, da so v skladu s to uredbo, skupaj z njihovo utemeljitvijo.
This should enable the Commission to examine the compliance of any remaining data localisation requirements.
To bi moralo Komisiji omogočiti, da pregleda skladnost preostalih zahtev glede lokalizacije podatkov.
The Commission should be able, where appropriate, to make comments to the Member State in question.
Komisija bi morala imeti možnost, da, kjer je to primerno, zadevni državi članici poda pripombe.
Such comments could include a recommendation to amend or repeal the data localisation requirement.
Te pripombe bi lahko vključevale tudi priporočilo za spremembo ali razveljavitev zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov.
The obligations to communicate existing data localisation requirements and draft acts to the Commission established by this Regulation should apply to regulatory data localisation requirements and draft acts of a general nature, but not to decisions addressed to a specific natural or legal person.
Obveznosti za sporočanje obstoječih zahtev glede lokalizacije podatkov in osnutkov aktov Komisiji, določene s to uredbo, bi se morale uporabljati za regulativne zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov in osnutke splošnih pravnih aktov, ne pa za odločitve, ki naslavljajo konkretno fizično ali pravno osebo.
In order to ensure the transparency of data localisation requirements in the Member States laid down in a law, regulation or administrative provision of a general nature for natural and legal persons, such as service providers and users of data processing services, Member States should publish information on such requirements on a national online single information point, and regularly update that information.
Da bi se v državah članicah zagotovila preglednost zahtev glede lokalizacije podatkov, določenih v zakonih in drugih splošnih predpisih, za fizične in pravne osebe, kot so ponudniki storitev in uporabniki storitev obdelave podatkov, bi morale države članice informacije o takšnih zahtevah objavljati na nacionalni enotni spletni informacijski točki in te informacije redno posodabljati.
Alternatively, Member States should provide up-to-date information on such requirements to a central information point established under another Union act.
Alternativno bi morale države članice o takšnih ukrepih zagotoviti posodobljene informacije centralni informacijski točki, ki jo vzpostavlja drug akt Unije.
In order to appropriately inform natural and legal persons of data localisation requirements across the Union, Member States should notify to the Commission the addresses of such single information points.
Za ustrezno obveščanje fizičnih in pravnih oseb o zahtevah glede lokalizacije podatkov v Uniji bi morale države članice Komisijo uradno obvestiti o naslovih teh enotnih informacijskih točk.
The Commission should publish this information on its own website, along with a regularly updated consolidated list of all data localisation requirements in force in Member States, including summarised information on those requirements.
Komisija bi morala te informacije objaviti na svojem spletišču skupaj z redno posodobljenim zbirnim seznamom vseh zahtev glede lokalizacije podatkov, ki veljajo v državah članicah, vključno s povzetki informacij o omenjenih zahtevah.
Data localisation requirements frequently stem from a lack of trust in cross-border data processing, deriving from the presumed unavailability of data for the purposes of the competent authorities of the Member States, such as for inspection and audit for regulatory or supervisory control.
Zahteve glede lokalizacije podatkov pogosto izvirajo iz pomanjkanja zaupanja v čezmejno obdelavo podatkov, saj se predpostavlja, da podatki niso razpoložljivi za namene pristojnih organov držav članic, kot so inšpekcijski pregledi in revizije za regulativne ali nadzorne namene.
Such lack of trust cannot be overcome solely by the nullity of contractual terms prohibiting lawful access to data by competent authorities for the performance of their official duties.
Takega pomanjkanja zaupanja ni mogoče odpraviti samo prek ničnosti pogodbenih pogojev, ki prepovedujejo zakonit dostop pristojnih organov do podatkov z namenom opravljanja njihovih uradnih dolžnosti.
Therefore, this Regulation should clearly stipulate that it does not affect the powers of competent authorities to request or obtain access to data in accordance with Union or national law, and that competent authorities cannot be refused access to data on the basis that the data are processed in another Member State.
Zato bi morala ta uredba jasno določiti, da ne posega v pooblastila pristojnih organov, da v skladu s pravom Unije ali nacionalnim pravom zahtevajo ali pridobijo dostop do podatkov, in da se pristojnim organom dostop do podatkov ne sme zavrniti na podlagi dejstva, da se podatki obdelujejo v drugi državi članici.
Competent authorities could impose functional requirements to support access to data, such as requiring that system descriptions are to be kept in the Member State concerned.
Pristojni organi bi lahko uvedli funkcionalne zahteve v podporo dostopu do podatkov, kot je zahteva, da morajo biti opisi sistemov shranjeni v zadevni državi članici.
Natural or legal persons who are subject to obligations to provide data to competent authorities can comply with such obligations by providing and guaranteeing effective and timely electronic access to the data to competent authorities, regardless of the Member State in the territory of which the data are processed.
Fizične ali pravne osebe, za katere veljajo obveznosti zagotavljanja podatkov pristojnim organom, lahko takšne obveznosti izpolnijo z zagotavljanjem in jamčenjem učinkovitega in pravočasnega elektronskega dostopa do podatkov pristojnim organom, ne glede na državo članico, na ozemlju katere so podatki obdelani.
Such access can be ensured through concrete terms and conditions in contracts between the natural or legal person subject to the obligation to provide access and the service provider.
Takšen dostop se lahko zagotovi s konkretnimi pogoji v pogodbah med fizično ali pravno osebo, za katero velja obveznost zagotavljanja dostopa, in ponudnikom storitev.
Where a natural or legal person is subject to an obligation to provide data and fails to comply with that obligation, the competent authority should be able to seek assistance from competent authorities in other Member States.
Kadar fizična ali pravna oseba, za katero veljajo obveznosti zagotavljanja podatkov, te obveznosti ne izpolni, bi moral imeti pristojni organ možnost, da zaprosi za pomoč pristojne organe v drugih državah članicah.
In such cases, competent authorities should use specific cooperation instruments in Union law or under international agreements, depending on the subject matter in a given case, such as, in the area of police cooperation, criminal or civil justice or in administrative matters respectively, Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA, Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe, Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001, Council Directive 2006/112/EC and Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010.
V takšnih primerih bi morali pristojni organi uporabiti posebne sodelovalne instrumente iz prava Unije ali na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov glede na predmet urejanja v posameznem primeru, kot na primer za področje policijskega sodelovanja, pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih in kazenskih zadevah oziroma sodelovanja v upravnih zadevah, v Okvirnem sklepu Sveta 2006/960/PNZ, Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2014/41/EU, Konvenciji Sveta Evrope o kibernetski kriminaliteti, Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001, Direktivi Sveta 2006/112/ES in Uredbi Sveta (EU) št. 904/2010.
In the absence of such specific cooperation mechanisms, competent authorities should cooperate with each other with a view to providing access to the data sought, through designated single points of contact.
Kadar takšnih sodelovalnih mehanizmov ni, bi morali pristojni organi sodelovati med seboj, da bi se zagotovil dostop do zaprošenih podatkov prek imenovanih enotnih kontaktnih točk.
Where a request for assistance entails obtaining access to any premises of a natural or legal person including to any data processing equipment and means, by the requested authority, such access must be in accordance with Union law or national procedural law, including any requirement to obtain prior judicial authorisation.
Kadar prošnja za pomoč vključuje, da zaprošeni organ pridobi dostop do prostorov fizične ali pravne osebe, vključno z vso opremo in sredstvi za obdelavo podatkov, mora biti takšen dostop v skladu s pravom Unije ali nacionalnim postopkovnim pravom, vključno z morebitno zahtevo po pridobitvi predhodne sodne odobritve.
This Regulation should not allow users to attempt to evade the application of national law.
Ta uredba uporabnikom ne bi smela omogočati možnosti za izogibanje uporabi nacionalnega prava.
It should therefore provide for the imposition, by Member States, of effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties on users which prevent competent authorities from receiving access to their data necessary for the performance of the competent authorities' official duties under Union and national law.
Zato bi morala določiti, da države članice naložijo učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne kazni za uporabnike, ki pristojnim organom preprečujejo dostop do svojih podatkov, potrebnih za opravljanje uradnih dolžnosti pristojnih organov na podlagi prava Unije in nacionalnega prava.
In urgent cases, where a user abuses its right, Member States should be able to impose strictly proportionate interim measures.
V nujnih primerih, ko uporabnik zlorabi svoje pravice, bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da določijo strogo sorazmerne začasne ukrepe.
Any interim measures requiring the re-localisation of data for longer than 180 days following the re-localisation would deviate from the free movement of data principle for a significant period and should, therefore, be communicated to the Commission for the examination of their compatibility with Union law.
Vsi začasni ukrepi, ki predpisujejo relokalizacijo podatkov za obdobje, daljše od 180 dni po relokalizaciji, bi odstopali od načela prostega pretoka podatkov za daljše časovno obdobje in bi jih bilo zato treba sporočiti Komisiji, da preveri njihovo skladnost s pravom Unije.
The ability to port data without hindrance is a key factor in facilitating user choice and effective competition on markets for data processing services.
Možnost neoviranega prenosa podatkov je ključni dejavnik pri olajševanju izbire uporabnikom ter omogoča učinkovito konkurenco na trgih storitev obdelave podatkov.
The real or perceived difficulties in porting data cross-border also undermine the confidence of professional users when taking up cross-border offers, and thereby their confidence in the internal market.
Prav tako dejanske ali domnevne težave pri čezmejnem prenosu podatkov spodkopavajo zaupanje poklicnih uporabnikov v čezmejne ponudbe in s tem v notranji trg.
Whereas individual consumers benefit from existing Union law, the ability to switch between service providers is not facilitated for those users who act in the course of their business or professional activities.
Medtem ko potrošnikom posameznikom obstoječe pravo Unije koristi, pa uporabnikom, ki izvajajo poslovne ali poklicne dejavnosti, ni olajšana možnost zamenjave ponudnika storitev.
Consistent technical requirements across the Union, whether concerning technical harmonisation, mutual recognition or voluntary harmonisation, also contribute to developing a competitive internal market for data processing services.
Dosledne tehnične zahteve po vsej Uniji, bodisi v zvezi s tehnično harmonizacijo, vzajemnim priznavanjem ali prostovoljno harmonizacijo, prav tako prispevajo k razvoju konkurenčnega notranjega trga za storitve obdelave podatkov.
In order to take full advantage of the competitive environment, professional users should be able to make informed choices and to easily compare the individual components of various data processing services offered in the internal market, including in respect of the contractual terms and conditions of porting data upon the termination of a contract.
Da bi v celoti izkoristili konkurenčno okolje, bi morali imeti poklicni uporabniki možnost ozaveščenega odločanja in preproste primerjave posameznih komponent različnih storitev obdelave podatkov, ki jih ponuja notranji trg, vključno v zvezi s pogodbenimi pogoji za prenos podatkov ob prenehanju pogodbe.