natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The maximum number of days at sea for which Spain may authorise a vessel flying its flag to be present in ICES divisions 8c and 9a, excluding the Gulf of Cádiz, carrying on board or deploying regulated gear and not being subject to special conditions in the period from 1 February 2018 to 31 January 2019, as laid down in Table I of Annex IIB to Regulation (EU) 2018/120, shall be increased to 129 days.
Največje število dni na morju, ki ga Španija lahko odobri plovilu, ki pluje pod njeno zastavo, da je v obdobju od 1. februarja 2018 do 31. januarja 2019 prisotno v razdelkih ICES 8c in 9a z izjemo Cadiškega zaliva, če ima na krovu ali uporablja regulirano orodje in zanj ne veljajo posebni pogoji, kakor je opredeljeno v tabeli I Priloge IIB k Uredbi (EU) 2018/120, se poveča na 129 dni.
OJ L 27, 31.1.2018, p. 27.
UL L 27, 31.1.2018, str. 27.
amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 as regards non-compliance with payment deadlines and as regards applicable exchange rate for drawing up declarations of expenditure
o spremembi Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 907/2014 v zvezi z neupoštevanjem plačilnih rokov in menjalnim tečajem, ki se uporablja pri pripravi izjave o odhodkih
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008, and in particular Article 40 and Article 106(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o financiranju, upravljanju in spremljanju skupne kmetijske politike in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 352/78, (ES) št. 165/94, (ES) št. 2799/98, (ES) št. 814/2000, (ES) št. 1290/2005 in (ES) št. 485/2008 ter zlasti člena 40 in člena 106(6) Uredbe,
Article 75(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 provides that payments of support to beneficiaries under the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) are to be made by the Member States during a certain time period.
Člen 75(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 določa, da države članice upravičencem v okviru integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema (IAKS) plačila za podporo izplačajo v določenem časovnem obdobju.
Payments made outside that period are ineligible for Union payments, and can therefore not be reimbursed by the Commission, as provided for in Article 40 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.
Plačila, ki se izplačajo izven tega obdobja, niso upravičena do plačila Unije, zato jih Komisija ne povrne, kot je določeno v členu 40 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013.
With regard to support granted under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) those payment deadlines will apply from claim year 2019.
Za podporo, odobreno v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), se bodo ti plačilni roki uporabljali od leta zahtevka 2019.
Specific rules related to payments from EAFRD should therefore be laid down.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti posebna pravila glede plačil iz EKSRP.
Considering that in some cases EAFRD IACS payments are made by Member States after 30 June due to additional checks by Member States related to contentious claims, appeals and other national legal disputes, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, a fixed margin related to expenditure should be laid down within which no reductions of the payments are to be made for these cases.
Ker v nekaterih primerih zaradi dodatnih preverjanj s strani držav članic v zvezi s spornimi zahtevki, pritožbami in drugimi nacionalnimi pravnimi spori države članice plačila EKSRP IAKS izvedejo po 30. juniju, bi bilo treba v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti v zvezi z odhodki določiti fiksni prag, do katerega se za te primere plačilo ne bi zmanjšalo.
In addition, once this margin is exceeded, in order to modulate the financial impact in proportion to the delay incurred in payment, provision should be made to empower the Commission to proportionally reduce the Union payments according to the length of delay in payment recorded.
Poleg tega so potrebne določbe, ki bi Komisijo pooblastile, da ob prekoračitvi tega praga sorazmerno zmanjšuje plačila Unije glede na dolžino ugotovljene zamude, in tako zagotovi, da je finančni učinek sorazmeren z dolžino zamude pri plačilu.
Article 5 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 provides for rules for the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) on proportional reductions to monthly payments where the expenditure has been made after the expiry of the payment deadline.
Člen 5 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 907/2014 določa pravila glede sorazmernega zmanjševanja mesečnih plačil, izplačanih po poteku plačilnega roka, za Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS).
As regards EAFRD, the declarations of expenditure and reimbursements are made once for each quarter of the year.
Za EKSRP se pripravi izjave o odhodkih in izplača povračila enkrat za vsako četrtletje.
For reasons of simplicity and efficiency, a single reduction percentage should be applied to late payments reimbursed from EAFRD for each quarter.
Zaradi preprostosti in učinkovitosti bi se moral za plačila, izplačana po preteku roka, ki prejmejo povračilo iz EKSRP, vsako četrtletje uporabiti enotni odstotek znižanja.
Article 11(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 provides for the exchange rate to be used by Member States which do not form a part of the euro zone for each payment or recovery operation for the purpose of drawing up their declarations of expenditure.
Člen 11(2) Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 907/2014 določa menjalni tečaj, ki ga pri pripravi izjave o odhodkih za vsako plačilo ali izterjavo uporabijo države članice, ki ne spadajo v euroobmočje.
However, the annual declarations of expenditure drawn up by Member States include amounts which do not involve a registration of a payment or a recovery operation in the accounts of the Paying Agency, such as the assigned revenue resulting from financial consequences of non-recovery, as provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 54(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.
Vendar letne izjave o odhodkih, ki jih pripravijo države članice, vključujejo zneske, ki v obračunih plačilne agencije niso evidentirani kot plačila ali izterjatve, kot so namenski prejemki, ki nastanejo zaradi finančnih posledic neizterjatve, kot je določeno v prvem pododstavku člena 54(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013.
Therefore, the applicable exchange rate for operations other than those specified in Article 11(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 should be provided for.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti menjalni tečaj, ki se uporablja za postopke, ki niso tisti, določeni v členu 11(2) Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 907/2014.
Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 is amended as follows:
Delegirana uredba (EU) št. 907/2014 se spremeni:
The title of Article 5 is replaced by the following:
naslov člena 5 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Non-Compliance with the latest payment deadline as regards the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund’;
„Neupoštevanje zadnjega roka za plačilo kar zadeva Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad“;
The following Article 5a is inserted after Article 5:
za členom 5 se vstavi naslednji člen 5a:
Non-Compliance with the latest payment deadline as regards the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development
Neupoštevanje zadnjega roka za plačilo kar zadeva Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja
As regards the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, pursuant to the exceptions referred to in the first paragraph of Article 40 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 and in accordance with the principle of proportionality, expenditure made after the payment deadline shall be eligible for Union payments under the conditions laid down in paragraphs 2 to 6 of this Article.
Kar zadeva Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), so v skladu z izjemami iz prvega odstavka člena 40 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 in z načelom sorazmernosti odhodki, nastali po preteku plačilnega roka, upravičeni do plačila Unije pod pogoji iz odstavkov 2 do 6 tega člena.
Where expenditure made after the deadline referred to in Article 75(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 is equal to the threshold of 5 % or less of the expenditure made before that deadline, no reduction of the interim payments shall be made.
Če odhodki, nastali po poteku roka iz člena 75(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013, znašajo 5 % ali manj od odhodkov, nastalih pred potekom tega roka, se vmesna plačila ne zmanjšajo.
Where expenditure made after the deadline referred to in Article 75(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 is above the threshold of 5 %, all further expenditure made late shall be reduced for the periods specified in Article 22(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 in accordance with the following rules:
Če so odhodki, nastali po poteku roka iz člena 75(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013, nad pragom 5 %, se vsi nadaljnji odhodki, nastali po poteku rokov, zmanjšajo za obdobja, določena v členu 22(2) Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 908/2014, v skladu z naslednjimi pravili:
expenditure made between 1 July and 15 October of the year in which the payment deadline expired shall be reduced by 25 %;
odhodki, nastali med 1. julijem in 15. oktobrom leta, v katerem je potekel plačilni rok, se zmanjšajo za 25 %;
expenditure made between 16 October and 31 December of the year in which the payment deadline expired shall be reduced by 60 %;
odhodki, nastali med 16. oktobrom in 31. decembrom leta, v katerem je potekel plačilni rok, se zmanjšajo za 60 %;
expenditure made later than 31 December of the year in which the payment deadline expired shall be reduced by 100 %.
odhodki, nastali po 31. decembru leta, v katerem je potekel plačilni rok, se zmanjšajo za 100 %.
By way of derogation from paragraph 2, where the threshold referred to in the first subparagraph of that paragraph has not been used in full for payments made in respect of calendar year N no later than 31 December of year N + 1 and the remainder of the threshold exceeds 2 %, that remainder shall be reduced to 2 %.
Če prag iz prvega pododstavka odstavka 2 ni bil v celoti uporabljen za plačila, izplačana za koledarsko leto N najpozneje do 31. decembra leta N + 1, in če preostanek praga presega 2 %, se z odstopanjem od ostavka 2 ta preostanek zmanjša na 2 %.
Where exceptional management conditions are encountered for certain measures or where justified reasons are advanced by the Member States, the Commission shall apply either different time scales from those laid down in paragraphs 2 and 3, or lower reductions or apply no reduction at all.
Če se za nekatere ukrepe pojavijo posebni pogoji poslovanja ali če država članica predloži utemeljeno obrazložitev, Komisija uporabi drugačno terminsko lestvico, kot so tiste iz odstavkov 2 in 3, ali manjši delež zmanjšanja ali pa plačila sploh ne zmanjša.
Checks on compliance with the payment deadline shall be made once each financial year on expenditure made by 15 October.
Preverjanje upoštevanja roka za plačilo se opravi enkrat v vsakem proračunskem letu za odhodke, nastale do 15. oktobra.
Any overrun of payment deadline shall be taken into account in the accounts clearance decision referred to in Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.
Morebitne prekoračitve roka za plačilo se upoštevajo pri odločitvi o potrditvi obračunov iz člena 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013.
The reductions referred to in this Article shall be applied without prejudice to the subsequent decision on conformity clearance, referred to in Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.
Zmanjšanja iz tega člena ne posegajo v poznejši sklep o potrditvi skladnosti iz člena 52 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013.
In Article 11(2), the following subparagraph is added:
v členu 11(2) se doda naslednji pododstavek:
‘For operations for which an operative event has not been laid down by the sectoral agricultural legislation, the applicable exchange rate shall be the last-but-one exchange rate established by the European Central Bank before the last month of the period in respect of which the expenditure or assigned revenue is declared.’.
„Za postopke, za katere v področni kmetijski zakonodaji ni bil določen operativni dogodek, se uporablja predzadnji menjalni tečaj, ki ga je Evropska centralna banka določila pred zadnjim mesecem obdobja, za katerega se prijavijo odhodki ali namenski prejemki.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 of 6 August 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to paying agencies and other bodies, financial management, clearance of accounts, rules on checks, securities and transparency (OJ L 255, 28.8.2014, p. 59).’
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 908/2014 z dne 6. avgusta 2014 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi s plačilnimi agencijami in drugimi organi, finančnim upravljanjem, potrjevanjem obračunov, pravili o kontrolah, varščinami in preglednostjo (UL L 255, 28.8.2014, str. 59).“
supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to risk assessments in relation to invasive alien species
o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 1143/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede ocen tveganja v zvezi z invazivnimi tujerodnimi vrstami
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species, and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1143/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. oktobra 2014 o preprečevanju in obvladovanju vnosa in širjenja invazivnih tujerodnih vrst in zlasti člena 5(3) Uredbe;
The Commission has, in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014, adopted a list of invasive alien species of Union concern (‘the Union list’), which is to be updated regularly.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (EU) št. 1143/2014 sprejela seznam invazivnih tujerodnih vrst, ki zadevajo Unijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: seznam Unije), ki se redno posodablja.
A precondition for including new species on the Union list is that a risk assessment as referred to in Article 5 of that Regulation (‘the risk assessment’) has been carried out.
Predpogoj za uvrstitev nove vrste na seznam Unije je opravljena ocena tveganja iz člena 5 navedene uredbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ocena tveganja).
Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 sets out, in points (a) to (h), the common elements that are to be considered in the risk assessment (‘the common elements’).
Člen 5(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1143/2014 v točkah od (a) do (h) določa skupne elemente, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri oceni tveganja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupni elementi).
Member States may, in accordance with Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014, submit requests for the inclusion of invasive alien species on the Union list.
Države članice lahko v skladu s členom 4(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1143/2014 predložijo zahtevke za uvrstitev invazivnih tujerodnih vrst na seznam Unije.
Those requests are to be accompanied by the risk assessment.
Navedenim zahtevkom mora biti priložena ocena tveganja.
Several methods and protocols to carry out the risk assessment are already in existence and are used and respected within the scientific community in the area of biological invasions.
Obstaja že več metod in protokolov za izvedbo ocene tveganja, ki se uporabljajo in upoštevajo znotraj znanstvene skupnosti na področju bioloških invazij.
The value and scientific robustness of such methods and protocols should be recognised.
Treba bi bilo priznati vrednost in zanesljivosti takih metod in protokolov.
In the interest of efficiently using existing knowledge, any method or protocol which includes the common elements should be accepted for the preparation of the risk assessment.
Da bi učinkovito uporabili obstoječe znanje, bi bilo treba za pripravo ocene tveganja sprejeti katero koli metodo ali protokol, ki vključuje skupne elemente.
However, in order to ensure that all decisions on listing species are based on risk assessments of similar high quality and robustness and to provide guidance to the risk assessors on how the ensure that the common elements are appropriately considered, it is necessary to set out a detailed description of the common elements, as well as a methodology to be applied in the risk assessment to which the existing methods and protocol should adhere.
Vendar pa je treba določiti podroben opis skupnih elementov in metodologijo, ki se uporabi pri oceni tveganja in s katero se morajo uskladiti vse obstoječe metode in protokoli, ter tako zagotoviti, da vse odločitve o uvrstitvi vrst na seznam temeljijo na ocenah tveganja podobne kakovosti in zanesljivosti ter da se ocenjevalcem tveganja dajo na razpolago smernice, kako zajamčiti ustrezno upoštevanje skupnih elementov.
In order for the risk assessment to help underpin decision-making at the Union level, it should be of relevance to the Union as a whole, excluding the outermost regions (‘the risk assessment area’).
Da bi bila ocena tveganja v pomoč pri odločanju na ravni Unije, bi morala biti relevantna za celotno Unijo z izjemo najbolj oddaljenih regij (v nadaljnjem besedilu: območje ocene tveganja).
In order for the risk assessment to provide a robust scientific basis and solid evidence to underpin decision-making, all information in it, including in relation to the ability of a species to establish and spread in the environment as per Article 4(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014, should be supported by the best available scientific evidence.
Da bi ocena tveganja nudila zanesljivo znanstveno osnovo in trdne dokaze, ki bi bili v pomoč pri odločanju, bi morale vse informacije iz te ocene, tudi v zvezi z zmožnostjo vrste za naselitev in širjenje v okolju v skladu s členom 4(3)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1143/2014, temeljiti na najboljših razpoložljivih znanstvenih dokazih.
This aspect should be addressed in the methodology to be applied in the risk assessment.
Ta vidik bi moral biti vključen v metodologijo, ki se uporablja pri oceni tveganja.
Invasive alien species are a serious environmental threat, but not every species is equally well studied.
Invazivne tujerodne vrste resno ogrožajo okolje, vendar posamezne vrste niso enako dobro proučene.
In cases where a species is not present in the risk assessment area or is only present in low numbers, there may be no knowledge or incomplete knowledge about that species.
Če vrsta ni prisotna na območju ocene tveganja ali je prisotna le v majhnem številu, je lahko poznavanje te vrste nepopolno ali ga sploh ni.
By the time full knowledge is acquired, the species may have already been introduced into or spread within the risk assessment area.
Ko se poznavanje vrste izpopolni, je morda že prišlo do njenega vnosa ali širjenja znotraj območja ocene tveganja.
Thus, the risk assessment should be able to account for such lack of knowledge and information and address the high degree of uncertainty as regards the consequences of an introduction or spread of the relevant species.
Zato bi pri oceni tveganja morala obstajati možnost, da se upoštevajo takšno pomanjkljivo poznavanje in nezadostne informacije ter obravnava visoka stopnja negotovosti glede posledic vnosa ali širjenja zadevnih vrst.
In order for the risk assessment to provide a sound basis to underpin decision-making, it should be subject to rigorous quality control,
Da bi bila ocena tveganja dobra osnova za odločanje, bi se morala njena kakovost strogo nadzirati –
Application of the common elements
Uporaba skupnih elementov
A detailed description of the application of the common elements laid down in points (a) to (h) of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 (‘the common elements’) is set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Podroben opis uporabe skupnih elementov iz točk od (a) do (h) člena 5(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1143/2014 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupni elementi) je določen v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Methodology to be applied in the risk assessment
Metodologija, ki se uporablja pri oceni tveganja
The risk assessment shall include the common elements, as specified in the Annex to this Regulation, and shall comply with the methodology set out in this Article.
Ocena tveganja vključuje skupne elemente, kot so določeni v Prilogi k tej uredbi, in upošteva metodologijo iz tega člena.
The risk assessment may be based on any protocol or method, provided that all requirements set out in this Regulation and in Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 are fulfilled.
Ocena tveganja lahko temelji na katerem koli protokolu ali metodi, pod pogojem da so izpolnjene vse zahteve iz te uredbe in Uredbe (EU) št. 1143/2014.
The risk assessment shall cover the territory of the Union, excluding the outermost regions (‘the risk assessment area’).
Ocena tveganja zajema ozemlje Unije z izjemo najbolj oddaljenih regij (v nadaljnjem besedilu: območje ocene tveganja).
The risk assessment shall be based on the most reliable scientific information available, including the most recent results of international research, supported by references to peer reviewed scientific publications.
Ocena tveganja temelji na najzanesljivejših razpoložljivih znanstvenih informacijah, osnovanih na strokovno pregledanih znanstvenih objavah, vključno z najnovejšimi rezultati mednarodnih raziskav.
In cases where there are no peer reviewed scientific publications or where the information provided by such publications is insufficient, or to supplement the information collected, the scientific evidence may also include other publications, expert opinions, information collected by Member States' authorities, official notifications and information from databases, including information collected through citizen science.
Če strokovno pregledane znanstvene objave ne obstajajo oziroma so informacije iz takšnih objav pomanjkljive ali za dopolnitev zbranih informacij, lahko znanstveni dokazi zajemajo tudi druge objave, strokovna mnenja, informacije, ki so jih zbrali organi držav članic, uradna obvestila in informacije iz podatkovnih zbirk, vključno z informacijami, zbranimi s pomočjo znanosti za državljane.
All sources shall be acknowledged and referenced.
Vse vire se potrdi in se navede sklic nanje.
The method or protocol used shall allow for completion of the risk assessment to take place even where there is no information about a certain species or when the information about a species is insufficient.
Uporabljena metoda ali protokol omogoča zaključek ocene tveganja tudi v primeru odsotnosti informacij ali pomanjkljivih informacij o določeni vrsti.
Where there is such a lack of information, the risk assessment shall state that fact explicitly so that no question in the risk assessment is left unanswered.
V primeru pomanjkljivih informacij se to v oceni tveganja izrecno navede, tako da nobeno vprašanje iz ocene tveganja ne ostane neodgovorjeno.
Each answer provided in the risk assessment shall include an assessment of the level of uncertainty or confidence attached to that answer, reflecting the possibility that information needed for the answer is not available or is insufficient or the fact that the available evidence is conflicting.
Vsak odgovor iz ocene tveganja vključuje oceno ravni negotovosti ali zaupanja, ki velja za ta odgovor in kaže na morebitno odsotnost informacij, potrebnih za odgovor, na njihovo pomanjkljivost ali pa na dejstvo, da si razpoložljivi dokazi nasprotujejo.
The assessment of the level of uncertainty or confidence attached to an answer shall be based on a documented method or protocol.
Ocena ravni negotovosti ali zaupanja, ki velja za odgovor, temelji na dokumentirani metodi ali protokolu.
The risk assessment shall include a reference to that documented method or protocol.
Ocena tveganja vsebuje sklic na navedeno dokumentirano metodo ali protokol.
The risk assessment shall include a summary of its different components, as well as an overall conclusion, in a clear and consistent form.
Ocena tveganja v jasni in dosledni obliki vsebuje povzetek svojih sestavnih delov in splošni sklep.