natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As a consequence, significant barriers to market entry and obstacles to further onward innovation could emerge and appreciably threaten effective end-to-end connectivity between end-users.
V tem smislu bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi upoštevati vse tehnične in ekonomske ovire za prihodnje podvajanje omrežij.
Where such interoperability issues arise, the Commission should be able to request a BEREC report which should provide a factual assessment of the market situation at Union and Member State level.
Takšne obveznosti pa so lahko v nekaterih primerih vsiljive, zmanjšujejo spodbude za naložbe in krepijo položaj že prevladujočih akterjev, zato bi jih bilo treba naložiti le, kadar je to upravičeno in sorazmerno za doseganje trajnostne konkurence na upoštevnih trgih.
Taking utmost account of the BEREC report and other available evidence and taking into account the effects on the internal market, the Commission should decide whether there is a need for regulatory intervention by national regulatory or other competent authorities.
Samo dejstvo, da že obstaja več kot ena takšna infrastruktura, se ne bi smelo razumeti kot dokaz, da so ta sredstva podvojljiva.
If the Commission considers that such regulatory intervention should be considered by national regulatory or other competent authorities, it should be able to adopt implementing measures specifying the nature and scope of possible regulatory interventions by national regulatory or other competent authorities, including in particular obligations to publish and allow the use, modification and redistribution of relevant information by the authorities and other providers and measures to impose the mandatory use of standards or specifications on all or specific providers.
Po potrebi bi podjetja morala imeti možnost, da se v kombinaciji s takšnimi obveznostmi dostopa oprejo tudi na obveznosti zagotovitve dostopa do fizične infrastrukture na podlagi Direktive 2014/61/EU.
National regulatory or other competent authorities should assess, in light of the specific national circumstances, whether any intervention is necessary and justified to ensure end-to-end-connectivity, and if so, impose proportionate obligations, in accordance with the Commission’s implementing measures, on those providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services with a significant level of coverage and user-uptake.
Vsakršne obveznosti, ki jih naloži nacionalni regulativni organ na podlagi te direktive, in odločitve, ki jih na podlagi Direktive 2014/61/EU sprejmejo drugi pristojni organi za zagotovitev dostopa do fizične infrastrukture v stavbah ali do fizične infrastrukture do dostopovne točke, bi morale biti usklajene.
The term significant should be interpreted in the sense that the geographic coverage and the number of end-users of the provider concerned represent a critical mass with a view to achieving the goal of ensuring end-to-end connectivity between end-users.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali imeti možnost, da podjetjem po potrebi naložijo obveznosti zagotavljanja dostopa do zmogljivosti iz priloge k tej direktivi, in sicer do vmesnikov aplikacijskih programov (API) in elektronskih programskih vodnikov (EPG), da bi zagotovili dostopnost končnih uporabnikov do digitalnih radijskih in televizijskih radiodifuzijskih storitev ter povezanih dopolnilnih storitev.
Providers with a limited number of end-users or limited geographic coverage which would contribute only marginally to achieving that goal, should normally not be subject to such interoperability obligations.
Takšne dopolnilne storitve bi lahko zajemale programske storitve, ki so posebej oblikovane za izboljšanje dostopnosti končnih uporabnikov invalidov, in programske storitve povezane televizije.
In situations where undertakings are deprived of access to viable alternatives to non-replicable wiring, cables and associated facilities inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point and in order to promote competitive outcomes in the interest of end-users, national regulatory authorities should be empowered to impose access obligations on all undertakings, irrespective of a designation as having significant market power.
Pomembno je, da nacionalni regulativni organi pri odločanju, do katere koncentracijske ali razdelilne točke nameravajo naložiti obveznost dostopa, izberejo točko v skladu s smernicami BEREC-a.
In that regard, national regulatory authorities should take into consideration all technical and economic barriers to future replication of networks.
Določitev točke, ki je bližje končnim uporabnikom, je ugodnejša za konkurenco na področju infrastrukture in uvedbo zelo visokozmogljivih omrežij.
However, as such obligations can in certain cases be intrusive, can undermine incentives for investments, and can have the effect of strengthening the position of dominant players, they should be imposed only where justified and proportionate to achieving sustainable competition in the relevant markets.
Tako bi moral nacionalni regulativni organ najprej razmisliti o določitvi točke v stavbi ali tik zunaj nje.
The mere fact that more than one such infrastructure already exists should not necessarily be interpreted as showing that its assets are replicable.
Lahko bi bilo upravičeno, da se obveznosti dostopa razširijo na napeljave in kable onstran prve koncentracijske ali razdelilne točke, medtem ko se takšne obveznosti omejijo na točke, ki so čim bližje končnim uporabnikom in lahko gostijo zadostno število takih uporabnikov, kadar se dokaže, da obstajajo velike in stalne fizične ali ekonomske ovire za podvajanje, ki povzročajo bistvene težave glede konkurence ali nedelovanje trga na maloprodajni ravni v škodo končnih uporabnikov.
If necessary in combination with such access obligations, undertakings should also be able to rely on the obligations to provide access to physical infrastructure on the basis of Directive 2014/61/EU.
Za oceno podvojljivosti omrežnih elementov je potreben pregled trga, ki se razlikuje od analize, s katero se oceni pomembnost tržne moči, tako da nacionalnemu regulativnemu organu ni treba dokazati pomembne tržne moči, da lahko naloži te obveznosti.
Any obligations imposed by the national regulatory authority under this Directive and decisions taken by other competent authorities under Directive 2014/61/EU to ensure access to in-building physical infrastructure or to physical infrastructure up to the access point should be consistent.
Po drugi strani je za takšen pregled potrebna zadostna ekonomska ocena tržnih pogojev, da se ugotovi, ali so izpolnjena merila, potrebna za naložitev obveznosti onstran prve koncentracijske ali razdelilne točke.
National regulatory authorities should be able, to the extent necessary, to impose obligations on undertakings to provide access to the facilities referred to in an annex to this Directive, namely application programming interfaces (APIs) and electronic programme guides (EPGs), to ensure not only accessibility for end-users to digital radio and television broadcast services but also to related complementary services.
Verjetneje je, da so takšne razširjene obveznosti dostopa potrebne na geografskih območjih, kjer je poslovno tveganje za uvedbo alternativne infrastrukture večje, na primer zaradi nizke gostote prebivalstva ali zaradi omejenega števila večstanovanjskih stavb.
Such complementary services should be able to include programme related services which are specifically designed to improve accessibility for end-users with disabilities, and programme related connected television services.
Obratno pa lahko visoka gostota gospodinjstev nakazuje, da je naložitev takšnih obveznosti nepotrebna.
It is important that when national regulatory authorities assess the concentration or distribution point up to which they intend to impose access, they choose a point in accordance with BEREC guidelines.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali tudi razmisliti, ali lahko takšne obveznosti okrepijo položaj podjetij, ki so določena kot podjetja s pomembno tržno močjo.
Selecting a point nearer to end-users will be more beneficial to infrastructure competition and the roll-out of very high capacity networks.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali imeti možnost, da naložijo obveznost dostopa do aktivnih ali virtualnih omrežnih elementov, ki se uporabljajo za zagotavljanje storitev na takšni infrastrukturi, če bi bil dostop do pasivnih elementov ekonomsko neučinkovit ali fizično neizvedljiv in če nacionalni regulativni organ meni, da brez takšnega posega ne bi bil dosežen namen obveznosti dostopa.
In this way the national regulatory authority should first consider choosing a point in a building or just outside a building.
Da bi izboljšali dosledne regulativne prakse v Uniji, bi morala Komisija imeti možnost, da od nacionalnega regulativnega organa zahteva, da umakne osnutke ukrepov, s katerimi se obveznosti dostopa razširijo onstran prve koncentracijske ali razdelilne točke, kadar se BEREC strinja z resnimi dvomi Komisije glede združljivosti osnutka ukrepa s pravom Unije in zlasti z regulativnimi cilji iz te direktive.
It could be justified to extend access obligations to wiring and cables beyond the first concentration or distribution point while confining such obligations to points as close as possible to end-users capable of hosting a sufficient number of end-users, where it is demonstrated that replication faces high and non-transitory physical or economic barriers, leading to important competition problems or market failures at the retail level to the detriment of end-users.
V takšnih primerih je za izpolnjevanje načela sorazmernosti lahko za nacionalne regulativne organe ustrezno, da določene kategorije lastnikov ali podjetij ali obeh izločijo iz obveznosti, ki presegajo prvo koncentracijsko ali razdelilno točko, ki bi jo morali določiti nacionalni regulativni organi, če bi obveznost dostopa, ki ne temelji na določitvi podjetja kot podjetja s pomembno tržno močjo, ogrozila njihov poslovni model za nedavno postavljene omrežne elemente, zlasti z majhnimi lokalnimi projekti.
The assessment of the replicability of network elements requires a market review which is different from an analysis assessing significant market power, and so the national regulatory authority does not need to establish significant market power in order to impose these obligations.
Za izključno veleprodajna podjetja ne bi smele veljate takšne obveznosti dostopa, če ponudijo učinkovit alternativni dostop do zelo visokozmogljivih omrežij na komercialni osnovi po pravičnih, nediskriminatornih in primernih pogojih, tudi kar zadeva ceno.
On the other hand, such review requires a sufficient economic assessment of market conditions, to establish whether the criteria necessary to impose obligations beyond the first concentration or distribution point are met.
To izjemo bi moralo biti mogoče razširiti pod enakimi pogoji tudi na druge ponudnike.
Such extended access obligations are more likely to be necessary in geographical areas where the business case for alternative infrastructure rollout is more risky, for example because of low population density or because of the limited number of multi-dwelling buildings.
Izjema morda ni primerna za ponudnike, ki prejemajo javna sredstva.
Conversely, a high concentration of households might indicate that the imposition of such obligations is unnecessary.
Souporaba pasivne infrastrukture, ki se uporablja pri zagotavljanju brezžičnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev v skladu z načeli konkurenčnega prava, je lahko zlasti uporabna za čim večjo zelo visokozmogljivo povezljivost po vsej Uniji, zlasti na manj gosto poseljenih območjih, kjer je podvajanje neizvedljivo, končni uporabniki pa tvegajo prikrajšanost za takšno povezljivost.
National regulatory authorities should also consider whether such obligations have the potential to strengthen the position of undertakings designated as having significant market power.
Nacionalni regulativni ali drugi pristojni organi bi izjemoma morali imeti možnost naložiti takšno souporabo ali lokaliziran dostop do gostovanja v skladu s pravom Unije, če je ta možnost izrecno določena v prvotnih pogojih za podelitev pravice uporabe in če dokažejo koristi takšne souporabe v smislu premagovanja nepremostljivih ekonomskih ali fizičnih ovir in je torej dostop do omrežij ali storitev zelo pomanjkljiv ali ga sploh ni, pri čemer upoštevajo več dejavnikov, zlasti potrebo po pokritosti vzdolž glavnih prometnih poti, izbiri in kakovostnejših storitvah za končne uporabnike ter ohranjanju pobud za postavitev infrastrukture.
National regulatory authorities should be able to impose access to active or virtual network elements used for service provision on such infrastructure if access to passive elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable, and if the national regulatory authority considers that, absent such an intervention, the purpose of the access obligation would be circumvented.
Kadar končni uporabniki nimajo dostopa, souporaba pasivne infrastrukture pa ne zadošča za rešitev položaja, bi nacionalni regulativni organi morali imeti možnost, da naložijo obveznosti glede souporabe aktivne infrastrukture.
In order to enhance consistent regulatory practice across the Union, the Commission should be able to require the national regulatory authority to withdraw its draft measures extending access obligations beyond the first concentration or distribution point, where BEREC shares the Commission’s serious doubts as to the compatibility of the draft measure with Union law and in particular the regulatory objectives of this Directive.
Pri tem nacionalni regulativni ali drugi pristojni organi ohranijo prožnost, da izberejo najustreznejšo obveznost souporabe ali dostopa, ki bi morala biti sorazmerna in utemeljena glede na naravo ugotovljene težave.
In such cases, in order to comply with the principle of proportionality, it can be appropriate for national regulatory authorities to exempt certain categories of owners or undertakings, or both, from obligations going beyond the first concentration or distribution point, which should be determined by national regulatory authorities, on the grounds that an access obligation not based on an undertaking’s designation as having significant market power would risk compromising their business case for recently deployed network elements, in particular by small local projects.
Čeprav je v določenih okoliščinah sicer primerno, da nacionalni regulativni ali drugi pristojni organ naloži obveznosti podjetjem, ne glede na določitev kot podjetja s pomembno tržne močjo, da bi se dosegli cilji, kot je povezljivost ali interoperabilnost storitev med koncema, pa je treba zagotoviti tudi, da se take obveznosti naložijo v skladu z regulativnim okvirom in zlasti njegovimi postopki uradnega obveščanja.
Wholesale-only undertakings should not be subject to such access obligations if they offer an effective alternative access on a commercial basis to a very high capacity network, on fair, non-discriminatory and reasonable terms and conditions, including as regards price.
Takšne obveznosti bi se morale naložiti le, kadar je to utemeljeno za doseganje ciljev te direktive in kadar so objektivno utemeljene, pregledne, sorazmerne in nediskriminatorne za namen spodbujanja učinkovitosti, trajnostne konkurenčnosti, učinkovitih naložb in inovacij, ter ob zagotavljanju največjih možnih koristi za končne uporabnike in v skladu z ustreznimi postopki uradnega obveščanja.
It should be possible to extend that exemption to other providers on the same terms.
Da bi lahko premostili nepremostljive ekonomske ali fizične ovire, ki preprečujejo, da bi končnim uporabnikom zagotovili storitve ali omrežja, ki temeljijo na uporabi radiofrekvenčnega spektra, in kadar še vedno obstajajo vrzeli v pokritosti mobilnega omrežja, lahko odprava takšnih vrzeli zahteva dostop do pasivne infrastrukture in njeno souporabo, kadar to ne zadostuje, pa dostop do aktivne infrastrukture in njeno souporabo, ali lokalizirane sporazume o dostopu do gostovanja.
The exemption may not be appropriate for providers that are in receipt of public funding.
Brez poseganja v obveznosti souporabe, vezane na pravice uporabe na podlagi drugih določb te direktive, in zlasti v ukrepe za spodbujanje konkurence, se lahko nacionalne regulativne ali druge pristojne organe, kadar nameravajo sprejeti ukrepe za naložitev souporabe pasivne infrastrukture oziroma – kadar pasivni dostop in souporaba ne zadostujeta – aktivne infrastrukture ali lokalizirane sporazume o dostopu do gostovanja, tudi pozove, naj preučijo morebitno tveganje za udeležence na trgu na manj pokritih območjih.
Sharing of passive infrastructure used in the provision of wireless electronic communications services in compliance with competition law principles can be particularly useful to maximise very high capacity connectivity throughout the Union, especially in less dense areas where replication is impracticable and end-users risk being deprived of such connectivity.
Sama pravila o konkurenci morda ne zadostujejo zmeraj za zagotovitev kulturne raznolikosti in pluralnosti medijev na področju digitalne televizije.
National regulatory or other competent authorities should, by way of exception, be able to impose such sharing or localised roaming access, in accordance with Union law, if that possibility has been clearly established in the original conditions for the granting of the right of use and they demonstrate the benefits of such sharing in terms of overcoming insurmountable economic or physical obstacles and access to networks or services is therefore severely deficient or absent, and taking into account several factors, including in particular the need for coverage along major transport paths, choice and a higher quality of service for end-users as well as the need to maintain infrastructure roll-out incentives.
Zaradi tehnološkega in tržnega razvoja mora obveznosti zagotavljanja pogojnega dostopa pod pravičnimi, primernimi in nediskriminatornimi pogoji za svoj domači trg redno preverjati država članica, zlasti zato, da ugotovi, ali je utemeljila razširitev obveznosti na EPG in API, v obsegu, potrebnem za zagotovitev dostopnosti do posebnih digitalnih radiodifuzijskih storitev za končne uporabnike.
In circumstances where there is no access by end-users, and sharing of passive infrastructure alone does not suffice to address the situation, the national regulatory authorities should be able to impose obligations on the sharing of active infrastructure.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da opredelijo digitalne radiodifuzijske storitve, do katerih morajo imeti končni uporabniki zagotovljen dostop, z zakoni ali drugimi predpisi, za katere menijo, da so potrebni.
In so doing, national regulatory or other competent authorities retain the flexibility to choose the most appropriate sharing or access obligation which should be proportionate and justified based on the nature of the problem identified.
Države članice bi morale imeti tudi možnost svojemu nacionalnemu regulativnemu organu dovoliti pregledati obveznosti v zvezi s pogojnim dostopom do digitalnih radiodifuzijskih storitev, da bi z analizo trga ocenili, ali naj prekličejo ali spremenijo pogoje za podjetja, ki nimajo pomembne tržne moči na upoštevnem trgu.
While it is appropriate in some circumstances for a national regulatory or other competent authority to impose obligations on undertakings irrespective of a designation of significant market power in order to achieve goals such as end-to-end connectivity or interoperability of services, it is necessary to ensure that such obligations are imposed in accordance with the regulatory framework and, in particular, its notification procedures.
Tak preklic ali sprememba ne bi smela negativno vplivati na dostop končnih uporabnikov do takih storitev ali možnosti za učinkovito konkurenco.
Such obligations should be imposed only where justified in order to secure the objectives of this Directive, and where they are objectively justified, transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory for the purpose of promoting efficiency, sustainable competition, efficient investment and innovation, and giving the maximum benefit to end-users, and imposed in accordance with the relevant notification procedures.
V posebnih okoliščinah se zahtevajo predhodne obveznosti, da se zagotovi razvoj konkurenčnega trga, katerega pogoji spodbujajo postavitev in uporabo zelo visokozmogljivih omrežij in storitev ter potrošnikom zagotavljajo čim večje koristi.
In order to overcome insurmountable economic or physical obstacles for providing end-users with services or networks which rely on the use of radio spectrum and where mobile coverage gaps persist, their closing may require the access and sharing of passive infrastructure, or, where this is not sufficient, the sharing of active infrastructure, or localised roaming access agreements.
Opredelitev pomembne tržne moči, ki se uporablja v tej direktivi, je enaka pojmu prevladujočega položaja, kot je opredeljen v sodni praksi Sodišča.
Without prejudice to sharing obligations attached to the rights of use on the basis of other provisions of this Directive, and in particular measures to promote competition, where national regulatory or other competent authorities intend to take measures to impose the sharing of passive infrastructure, or when passive access and sharing are not sufficient, active infrastructure sharing or localised roaming access agreements, they may, however, also be called to consider the possible risk for market participants in underserved areas.
Dve podjetji lahko štejeta ali več podjetij lahko šteje za podjetja, ki imajo skupaj prevladujoči položaj ne samo, kadar med njimi obstajajo strukturne ali druge povezave, temveč tudi, kadar struktura upoštevnega trga prispeva k usklajenim učinkom, kar pomeni, da spodbuja vzporedno ali usklajeno protikonkurenčno obnašanje na trgu.
Competition rules alone may not always be sufficient to ensure cultural diversity and media pluralism in the area of digital television.
Bistveno je, da bi se predhodne regulativne obveznosti naložile samo za veleprodajni trg, kjer je eno ali več podjetij s pomembno tržno močjo, da se zagotovi trajnostna konkurenca, ukrepi konkurenčnega prava Unije in nacionalnega konkurenčnega prava pa ne zadostujejo za reševanje težave.
Technological and market developments make it necessary to review obligations to provide conditional access on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms on a regular basis, by a Member State for its national market, in particular to determine whether it is justified to extend obligations to EPGs and APIs, to the extent necessary to ensure accessibility for end-users to specified digital broadcasting services.
Komisija je pripravila smernice na ravni Unije v skladu z načeli konkurenčnega prava, ki jih bodo morali upoštevati nacionalni regulativni organi pri ocenjevanju učinkovitosti konkurence na danem trgu in pri ocenjevanju pomembne tržne moči.
Member States should be able to specify the digital broadcasting services to which access by end-users is to be ensured by any legislative, regulatory or administrative means that they consider to be necessary.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali analizirati, ali na posameznem trgu izdelkov ali storitev na nekem geografskem območju vlada učinkovita konkurenca, pri čemer lahko to območje zajema celotno ozemlje zadevne države članice ali del njenega ozemlja ali dele sosednjih ozemelj držav članic, ki se obravnavajo kot celota.
Member States should also be able to permit their national regulatory authority to review obligations in relation to conditional access to digital broadcasting services in order to assess through a market analysis whether to withdraw or amend conditions for undertakings that do not have significant market power on the relevant market.
Analiza učinkovite konkurence bi morala vključevati analizo, ali je trg potencialno konkurenčen, in s tem tudi, ali je pomanjkanje učinkovite konkurence trajno.