natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to those assessments, fruits of Ananas comosus (L.)
Poleg tega ni bilo izbruhov škodljivih organizmov, povezanih z vnosom navedenih plodov iz ene ali več tretjih držav.
Merrill, Cocos nucifera L., Durio zibethinus Murray, Musa L. and Phoenix dactylifera L. do not host Union quarantine pests or pests subject to measures adopted pursuant to Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, or commonly hosted pests which may impact on plant species grown in the Union.
Prav tako pri vnosu navedenih plodov na ozemlje Unije ni bilo ponavljajočih se prestrežb zaradi prisotnosti karantenskih škodljivih organizmov za Unijo ali škodljivih organizmov, za katere veljajo ukrepi, sprejeti v skladu s členom 30 navedene uredbe.
Moreover, there have been no pest outbreaks linked to the introduction of those fruits from one or more third countries.
Glede na to, da navedeni plodovi izpolnjujejo vsa merila iz Priloge VI k Uredbi (EU) 2016/2031, se za njihov vnos na ozemlje Unije ne bi smelo zahtevati fitosanitarno spričevalo.
Neither have those fruits been subject to repetitive interceptions due to the presence of Union quarantine pests or pests subject to the measures adopted pursuant to Article 30 of that Regulation during their introduction into the Union territory.
Seznama, ki ju je treba pripraviti v skladu s členom 42(3) in členom 73 Uredbe (EU) 2016/2031, se nanašata na uvozna pravila, ki temeljijo na podobnih merilih za oceno tveganja, kot so določena v prilogah III in VI k navedeni uredbi.
In view of the fact that those fruits fulfil all of the criteria of Annex VI to Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, no phytosanitary certificate should be required for their introduction into the Union territory.
Osredotočata se na tveganja, ki jih predstavljajo zadevne rastline in rastlinski proizvodi, in ne na tveganja zaradi posameznih škodljivih organizmov.
The lists to be established under Article 42(3) and Article 73 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 both concern import rules which are based on similar criteria for risk assessment, as set out in Annexes III and VI to that Regulation.
Pripravljena sta bila v skladu z enotno metodologijo za oceno tveganja, po kateri se tudi posodabljata, in sicer na podlagi razpoložljivih tehničnih in znanstvenih dokazov.
They are focused on the risks posed by the respective plants and plant products, instead of the risks of specific pests.
Zato ju je primerno združiti v eni sami uredbi.
They have been elaborated under a common risk assessment methodology and shall be updated under the same methodology, on the basis of the available technical and scientific evidence.
Ker se Uredba (EU) 2016/2031 uporablja od 14. decembra 2019 in da bi se zagotovila dosledna uporaba vseh pravil glede vnosa rastlin, rastlinskih proizvodov in drugih predmetov v Unijo, bi se morala ta uredba uporabljati od istega datuma.
It is therefore appropriate to integrate them in one Regulation.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
As Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 applies from 14 December 2019, and in order to ensure a consistent application of all rules concerning the introduction into the Union of plants, plant products and other objects, this Regulation should apply from the same date.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee for Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Zelo tvegane rastline, rastlinski proizvodi in drugi predmeti
Article 1
Rastline, rastlinski proizvodi in drugi predmeti, navedeni v Prilogi I, se štejejo za zelo tvegane rastline, rastlinske proizvode in druge predmete v smislu člena 42(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/2031, njihov vnos na ozemlje Unije pa je prepovedan, dokler se ne izvede ocena tveganja.
High risk plants, plant products and other objects
Člen 2
The plants, plant products and other objects listed in Annex I are considered high risk plants, plant products and other objects within the meaning of Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, and their introduction into the Union territory shall be prohibited pending a risk assessment.
Fitosanitarno spričevalo za vnos nekaterih rastlin v Unijo
Article 2
Za vnos rastlin, ki niso vključene na seznam iz člena 72(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/2031, v Unijo se zahteva fitosanitarno spričevalo.
Phytosanitary certificate for the introduction into the Union of certain plants
Vendar ta zahteva ne velja za plodove, navedene v Prilogi II.
A phytosanitary certificate shall be required for the introduction into the Union of plants, other than the plants included in the list referred to in Article 72(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.
Člen 3
However, fruits listed in Annex II shall be excluded from this requirement.
Začetek veljavnosti in uporaba
Entry into force and application
Uporablja se od 14. decembra 2019.
This Regulation shall enter into force the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
It shall apply from 14 December 2019.
V Bruslju, 18. decembra 2018
For the Commission
UL L 317, 23.11.2016, str. 4.
The President
Direktiva Sveta 2000/29/ES z dne 8. maja 2000 o varstvenih ukrepih proti vnosu organizmov, škodljivih za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode, v Skupnost in proti njihovemu širjenju v Skupnosti (UL L 169, 10.7.2000, str. 1).
OJ L 317, 23.11.2016, p. 4.
PRILOGA I
Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1).
Seznam zelo tveganih rastlin, rastlinskih proizvodov in drugih predmetov v smislu člena 42(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/2031
ANNEX I
Rastline za saditev, razen semen, materiala in vitro ter naravno ali siljeno pritlikavih lesnatih rastlin za saditev, s poreklom iz katere koli tretje države in iz naslednjih rodov ali vrst:
List of high risk plants, plant products and other objects, within the meaning of Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
Oznaka KN
CN Code
Rastline Ullucus tuberosus s poreklom iz katere koli tretje države.
Description
Plodovi Momordica L. s poreklom iz tretjih držav ali območij tretjih držav, kjer je znana prisotnost Thrips palmi Karny in se ne izvajajo učinkoviti ukrepi za zmanjšanje tveganja zaradi navedenega škodljivega organizma.
Plants of Ullucus tuberosus originating from all third countries.
Les Ulmus L. s poreklom iz tretjih držav ali območij tretjih držav, kjer je znana prisotnost Saperda tridentata Olivier.
Fruits of Momordica L. originating from third countries or areas of third countries where Thrips palmi Karny is known to occur and where effective mitigation measures for that pest are lacking.
PRILOGA II
Wood of Ulmus L. originating from third countries or areas of third countries where Saperda tridentata Olivier is known to occur.
Seznam plodov, za katere se pri vnosu v Unijo ne zahteva fitosanitarno spričevalo, v smislu člena 73 Uredbe (EU) 2016/2031
List of fruits for which a phytosanitary certificate is not required for introduction into the Union, within the meaning of Article 73 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
Za navedeni škodljivi organizem je znano, da ima lahko velik učinek na rastlinske vrste, ki imajo velik gospodarski, družbeni ali okoljski pomen za ozemlje Unije.
CN code
Vendar se ta škodljivi organizem ne pojavlja v vseh tretjih državah, prav tako pa se ne pojavlja na nekaterih območjih tretjih držav, kjer je znana njegova prisotnost.
Council Regulation (EU) 2018/2025
Uredba Sveta (EU) 2018/2025
fixing for 2019 and 2020 the fishing opportunities for Union fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks
o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti za ribiška plovila Unije za nekatere staleže globokomorskih rib za leti 2019 in 2020
Article 43(3) of the Treaty provides that the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, is to adopt measures on the fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities.
Člen 43(3) Pogodbe določa, da Svet na predlog Komisije sprejme ukrepe o določitvi in dodelitvi ribolovnih možnosti.
Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council requires that conservation measures be adopted taking into account available scientific, technical and economic advice, including, where relevant, reports drawn up by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF).
Uredba (EU) št. 1380/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta zahteva, da se ohranitveni ukrepi sprejmejo ob upoštevanju razpoložljivih znanstvenih, tehničnih in gospodarskih mnenj, kar vključuje, če je to ustrezno, poročila, ki jih pripravi Znanstveni, tehnični in gospodarski odbor za ribištvo (STECF).
It is incumbent upon the Council to adopt measures on the fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities, including certain conditions functionally linked thereto, as appropriate.
Svet je zadolžen za sprejetje ukrepov o določitvi in dodelitvi ribolovnih možnosti, vključno in če je to potrebno z nekaterimi pogoji, ki so funkcionalno povezani s tem.
Fishing opportunities should be distributed among Member States in such a way as to assure each Member State relative stability of fishing activities for each stock or fishery and having due regard to the objectives of the common fisheries policy (CFP) established by Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Ribolovne možnosti bi bilo treba med države članice razdeliti tako, da se vsaki državi članici zagotovi sorazmerna stabilnost ribolovnih dejavnosti za vsak stalež ali ribolov, in ob upoštevanju ciljev skupne ribiške politike (SRP) iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013.
The total allowable catches (‘TACs’) should be established on the basis of available scientific advice, taking into account biological and socioeconomic aspects whilst ensuring fair treatment between fishing sectors, as well as in the light of the opinions expressed during the consultation of stakeholders, and in particular the advisory councils concerned.
Celotne dovoljene ulove (TAC) bi bilo treba določiti na podlagi razpoložljivega znanstvenega mnenja ter ob upoštevanju bioloških in družbenogospodarskih vidikov, pri čemer bi bilo treba zagotoviti pošteno obravnavo med ribiškimi sektorji, pa tudi ob upoštevanju mnenj, izraženih med posvetovanjem z zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti z zadevnimi svetovalnimi sveti.
Where a TAC relating to a stock is allocated to one Member State only, it is appropriate to empower that Member State in accordance with Article 2(1) of the Treaty to determine the level of such TAC.
Če se TAC za določen stalež dodeli le eni državi članici, je ustrezno to državo članico v skladu s členom 2(1) Pogodbe pooblastiti za določitev stopnje takšnega TAC.
Provisions should be made to ensure that, when fixing that TAC level, the Member State concerned acts in a manner fully consistent with the principles and rules of the CFP.
Sprejeti bi bilo treba določbe za zagotovitev, da zadevna država članica pri določanju stopnje TAC v celoti upošteva načela in pravila SRP.
Council Regulation (EC) No 847/96 introduced additional conditions for year-to-year management of TACs, including, under Articles 3 and 4 of that Regulation, flexibility provisions for precautionary and analytical TACs.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 847/96 so bili določeni dodatni pogoji za vsakoletno upravljanje TAC, vključno z določbami glede prilagodljivosti za previdnostne in analitske TAC iz členov 3 in 4 navedene uredbe.
Under Article 2 of that Regulation, when fixing the TACs, the Council is to decide to which stocks Article 3 or 4 of that Regulation is not to apply, in particular on the basis of the biological status of the stocks.
V skladu s členom 2 navedene uredbe Svet pri določanju TAC odloči, za katere staleže se člen 3 ali 4 navedene uredbe ne uporablja, zlasti na podlagi biološkega statusa staležev.
More recently, a further year-to-year flexibility mechanism was introduced by Article 15(9) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 for all stocks that are subject to the landing obligation.
Nedavno je bil s členom 15(9) Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013 uveden dodatni mehanizem vsakoletne prilagodljivosti za vse staleže, za katere velja obveznost iztovarjanja.
Therefore, in order to avoid excessive flexibility that would undermine the principle of rational and responsible exploitation of marine biological resources, hinder the achievement of the objectives of the CFP and result in the deterioration of the biological status of the stocks, it should be established that Articles 3 and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 apply to analytical TACs only where the year-to-year flexibility provided for in Article 15(9) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 is not used.
Da bi se torej izognili prekomerni prilagodljivosti, ki bi spodkopala načelo razumnega in odgovornega izkoriščanja morskih bioloških virov, ovirala doseganje ciljev SRP in poslabšala biološki status staležev, bi bilo treba določiti, da se člena 3 in 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 847/96 za analitske TAC uporabljata le, kadar se ne uporablja vsakoletna prilagodljivost iz člena 15(9) Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013.
The landing obligation referred to in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 is introduced on a fishery-by-fishery basis.
Obveznost iztovarjanja iz člena 15 Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013 se uvede glede na posamezno ribištvo.
Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 provides that, when the landing obligation in respect of a fish stock is introduced, fishing opportunities are to be fixed taking into account the change from fixing fishing opportunities that reflect landings to fixing fishing opportunities that reflect catches.
Na podlagi skupnih priporočil, ki jih predložijo države članice, in v skladu s členom 15 navedene uredbe je Komisija sprejela več delegiranih uredb o posebnih načrtih za zavržke, ki se uporabljajo za začetno obdobje največ treh let in se lahko podaljšajo za dodatno skupno obdobje treh let, za izvajanje obveznosti iztovarjanja.
However, specific exemptions from the landing obligation are granted in accordance with Article 15(4) to (7) of that Regulation.
Ribolovne možnosti bi morale biti v skladu z mednarodnimi sporazumi in načeli, kot je Sporazum Združenih narodov glede ohranjanja in upravljanja čezconskih staležev rib in izrazito selivskih staležev rib iz leta 1995, ter v skladu s podrobnimi načeli upravljanja iz mednarodnih smernic Organizacije Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo v zvezi z upravljanjem globokomorskega ribolova na odprtih morjih iz leta 2008, v skladu s katerimi bi moral biti upravni organ zlasti previdnejši, kadar so informacije negotove, nezanesljive ali neustrezne.
On the basis of the joint recommendations submitted by the Member States and in accordance with Article 15 of that Regulation, the Commission adopted a number of delegated regulations laying down specific discard plans applicable for an initial period of no more than three years, renewable for a further total period of three years, implementing the landing obligation.
Pomanjkanje ustreznih znanstvenih informacij ne bi smelo biti razlog za odlaganje ali nesprejetje ukrepov ohranjanja in upravljanja.
Fishing opportunities should be in accordance with international agreements and principles, such as the 1995 United Nations agreement concerning the conservation and management of straddling stocks and highly migratory fish stocks, and the detailed management principles laid down in the 2008 International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in the High Seas of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, according to which, in particular, a regulator should be more cautious when information is uncertain, unreliable or inadequate.
TAC in kvote Unije za črni morski meč v vodah Unije ter mednarodnih vodah območij 5, 6, 7 in 12 bi bilo treba določiti ob upoštevanju, da tudi tretje države lovijo iz tega staleža in da bi ribolovne možnosti Unije morale ustrezati njenemu historičnemu deležu v ulovu iz tega staleža.
The absence of adequate scientific information should not be used as a reason for postponing or failing to take conservation and management measures.
Glede na mnenje Mednarodnega sveta za raziskovanje morja (ICES) v zvezi z zmanjšanjem ribolovnih možnosti, ob upoštevanju visoke stopnje izkoriščanja kvote in uvedbe obveznosti celotnega iztovarjanja v letu 2019, usmerjeni ribolov ne bi smel biti dovoljen za sluzoglavke na podobmočjih 3 do 10, 12 in 14 (Severno morje, severozahodne in jugozahodne vode), TAC pa bi moral biti določen le za prilov.
The TAC and the Union quota for black scabbardfish in Union and international waters of 5, 6, 7 and 12 should be set taking into account that there are third-country catches from that stock and that the Union should have fishing opportunities corresponding to the share of historic catches from that stock.
Glede na mnenje ICES so omejena opazovanja na krovu pokazala, da je delež čebulastookega repaka v prijavljenem ulovu okroglonosega repaka manjši od 1 %.
In view of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) advice concerning a decrease in fishing opportunities, given a high quota uptake and in the light of the introduction of the full landing obligation in 2019, directed fisheries should not be allowed for alfonsinos in subareas 3 to 10, 12 and 14 (North Sea, North- and South-Western waters) and the TAC should be set for bycatches only.
Na podlagi navedenega ICES priporoča, da se prepove usmerjeni ribolov čebulastookega repaka, vsi prilovi pa vštejejo v TAC za okroglonosega repaka, da bi se tako čim bolj zmanjšalo morebitno napačno poročanje o vrstah.
According to the advice provided by ICES, limited on-board observations show that the percentage of roughhead grenadier has been less than 1 % of the reported catches of roundnose grenadier.
Kot je navedel ICES, so na območjih, kjer je ribolov čebulastookega repaka dovoljen, razlike med relativnimi deleži okroglonosega in čebulastookega repaka, prijavljenimi v uradnih iztovarjanjih, ter nadzorovanimi ulovi in znanstvenimi raziskavami precejšnje, in zajemajo več kot en velikostni razred (so več kot desetkratne).
On the basis of those considerations, ICES advises that there should be no directed fisheries for roughhead grenadier and that bycatches should be counted against the TAC for roundnose grenadier in order to minimise the potential for species misreporting.
Za to vrsto je na voljo zelo malo podatkov in pri nekaterih podatkih iz prijavljenega iztovora gre po mnenju ICES za napačno poročanje o vrstah.
ICES indicates that there are considerable differences, of more than one order of magnitude (more than ten times), between the relative proportions of roundnose and roughhead grenadier reported in the official landings and the observed catches and scientific surveys in the areas where the fishery for roughhead grenadier currently occurs.
Zato ni mogoče sestaviti točne pretekle slike ulova okroglonosega repaka.
There is very limited data available for this species, and some of the reported landing data are considered by ICES to be species misreporting.
V skladu z znanstvenim mnenjem bi bilo zato treba vsak prilov čebulastookega repaka omejiti na 1 % kvote vsake države članice za okroglonosega repaka in ga v navedeno kvoto tudi všteti.
As a consequence, it is not possible to establish an accurate historical record of catches of roughhead grenadier.
Če se čebulastooki repak obravnava le kot prilov pri ribolovu okroglonosega repaka in spada v isti TAC, ne bo več prišlo do napačnega poročanja.
Therefore, any bycatches for roughhead grenadier should be limited to 1 % of each Member State's quota of roundnose grenadier and counted against that quota, in line with the scientific advice.
Glede na mnenje ICES je primerno, da se TAC za okatega ribona na podobmočjih ICES 6, 7 in 8 (severozahodne vode) ohrani le kot prilovni TAC.
If roughhead grenadier is considered a bycatch only to roundnose grenadier and belongs to the same TAC there will no longer be any misreporting.
Ulov okatega ribona poteka na zadevnih območjih Odbora za ribištvo za vzhodni srednji Atlantik (CECAF) in Generalne komisije za ribištvo v Sredozemlju (GFCM), ki mejijo na podobmočje ICES 9.
In view of the ICES advice, it is appropriate that the TAC for red seabream in ICES subareas 6, 7 and 8 (North-Western waters) be kept as a bycatch-only TAC.
Ker so podatki ICES za navedena sosednja območja nepopolni, bi moral obseg TAC ostati omejen na podobmočje ICES 9.
Catches of red seabream are taken from the relevant Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic (CECAF) and General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) areas, which border on ICES subarea 9.
Vendar so bile za zagotovitev, da se odločitve o upravljanju sprejemajo na najboljši razpoložljivi podlagi, sprejete določbe za sporočanje podatkov za navedena sosednja območja.
Given that ICES data for those adjacent areas are incomplete, the scope of the TAC should remain limited to ICES subarea 9.
Zaradi majhnega izkoriščanja kvote in dejstva, da se usmerjeni ribolov ne izvaja, TAC za črnega morskega meča na podobmočjih ICES 1 do 4 (Severno morje in Skagerrak) ne bi bilo več treba določiti.
For red seabream in ICES subarea 10, no ICES advice has been provided for 2020.
Mnenje ICES določa, da bi nedoločitev TAC povzročila nizko tveganje netrajnostnega izkoriščanja oz. ne bi povzročila takega tveganja.
However, fishing opportunities should be set for both 2019 and 2020.
ICES ugotavlja, da se usmerjeni ribolov Unije na oranžno sluzoglavko v severovzhodnem Atlantiku ni izvajal od leta 2010.
It is possible that an appropriate amendment to the fishing opportunities established by this Regulation will be needed when the scientific advice is issued for 2020.
Po mnenju ICES bi bilo treba ribolovno umrljivost globokomorskih morskih psov čim bolj zmanjšati, ciljno usmerjeni ribolov pa ne bi smel biti dovoljen.
The TACs for roundnose grenadier in ICES subareas 1, 2 and 4 (North Sea) and greater forkbeard in ICES subareas 1 to 10, 12 and 14 should no longer be set.
Ribolovne možnosti za takšne vrste bi bilo zato treba popolnoma omejiti s splošno prepovedjo ribolova teh vrst.
The ICES advice establishes that the absence of TACs would result in no or a low risk of unsustainable exploitation.
Vendar se pri usmerjenem malem globokomorskem ribolovu črnega morskega meča s parangalom neizbežno prilovijo globokomorski morski psi, ki se zdaj mrtvi zavržejo.
ICES advises that there should be no catches of orange roughy until 2020.
Parangali veljajo za selektivno ribolovno orodje pri takem ribolovu.
It is appropriate for the fishing, retaining on board, transhipping and landing of that species to be prohibited, as the stock is depleted and is not recovering.
Vendar se niti s tem orodjem ni mogoče izogniti nenamernemu ulovu globokomorskih morskih psov.
ICES notes that there have been no directed Union fisheries for orange roughy in the North-East Atlantic since 2010.
Zato bi bilo treba ohraniti restriktivni TAC za neizbežne prilove navedenih vrst pri usmerjenem ribolovu črnega morskega meča s parangali.
ICES advises that the fishing mortality of deep-sea sharks should be minimised and no targeted fishing should be permitted.
Zadevne države članice bi morale nadgraditi ukrepe regionalnega upravljanja za ribolov črnega morskega meča, da bi se zmanjšal prilov globokomorskih morskih psov.
The deep-sea sharks are long-lived species with low reproductive rates and have quickly become overexploited.
Poleg tega bi morale oblikovati posebne ukrepe za zbiranje podatkov o globokomorskih morskih psih, da bi zagotovile pozorno spremljanje navedenih staležev.
Fishing opportunities for such species should therefore be fully restricted through a general prohibition on fishing those species.
Določitev dovoljenega prilova Unije za globokomorske morske pse v vodah Unije in mednarodnih vodah podobmočij ICES 5 do 9, v vodah Unije in mednarodnih vodah podobmočja ICES 10 ter v vodah Unije območij CECAF 34.1.1, 34.1.2 in 34.2 ne posega v načelo relativne stabilnosti za globokomorske morske pse na teh območjih.
However, directed artisanal deep-sea fisheries for black scabbardfish that use longlines have unavoidable bycatches of deep-sea sharks, which are currently discarded dead.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJO UREDBO: