natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Differences between the definitions of predicate offences in national law should not hinder international cooperation in criminal proceedings regarding money laundering.
Razlike med opredelitvami predhodnih kaznivih dejanj v nacionalnem pravu ne bi smele ovirati mednarodnega sodelovanja pri kazenskih postopkih v zvezi s pranjem denarja.
Cooperation with third countries should be intensified, in particular by encouraging and supporting the establishment of effective measures and mechanisms to combat money laundering and by ensuring better international cooperation in this field.
Sodelovanje s tretjimi državami bi bilo treba okrepiti, zlasti s spodbujanjem in podpiranjem uvedbe učinkovitih ukrepov in mehanizmov za boj proti pranju denarja in z zagotavljanjem boljšega mednarodnega sodelovanja na tem področju.
This Directive does not apply to money laundering involving property derived from criminal offences affecting the Union’s financial interests, which is subject to specific rules as laid down in Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Ta direktiva se ne uporablja za pranje denarja, ki vključuje premoženje, pridobljeno s kaznivimi dejanji, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, in za katero veljajo posebna pravila, določena v Direktivi (EU) 2017/1371 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
This is without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to transpose this Directive and Directive (EU) 2017/1371 by means of a single comprehensive framework at national level.
To ne posega v možnost držav članic, da to direktivo in Direktivo (EU) 2017/1371 prenesejo z enim samim celovitim okvirom na nacionalni ravni.
In accordance with Article 325(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Member States are to take the same measures to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union as they take to counter fraud affecting their own financial interests.
V skladu s členom 325(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) morajo države članice za preprečevanje goljufij, ki bi lahko škodovale finančnim interesom Unije, sprejeti enake ukrepe, kot jih sprejmejo za preprečevanje goljufij, ki bi lahko škodovale njihovim lastnim finančnim interesom.
Member States should ensure that certain types of money laundering activities are also punishable when committed by the perpetrator of the criminal activity that generated the property (‘self-laundering’).
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da so določene vrste dejavnosti pranja denarja kaznive tudi, kadar jih stori storilec kaznive dejavnosti, iz katere izvira premoženje (lastno pranje denarja).
In such cases, where, the money laundering activity does not simply amount to the mere possession or use of property, but also involves the transfer, conversion, concealment or disguise of property and results in further damage than that already caused by the criminal activity, for instance by putting the property derived from criminal activity into circulation and, by doing so, concealing its unlawful origin, that money laundering activity should be punishable.
V takih primerih, kadar dejavnost pranja denarja ne zajema le posedovanja ali uporabe premoženja, temveč tudi njegov prenos, preoblikovanje, skrivanje ali prikrivanje ter povzroči dodatno škodo poleg tiste, ki jo je povzročila kazniva dejavnost, na primer z dajanjem premoženja, pridobljenega s kaznivo dejavnostjo, v obtok, in s tem skrivanje njegovega nezakonitega izvora, bi morala biti ta dejavnost pranja denarja kazniva.
In order for criminal law measures to be effective against money laundering, a conviction should be possible without it being necessary to establish precisely which criminal activity generated the property, or for there to be a prior or simultaneous conviction for that criminal activity, while taking into account all relevant circumstances and evidence.
Da bi bili kazenskopravni ukrepi zoper pranje denarja učinkoviti, bi morala biti mogoča obsodba, ne da bi bilo potrebno natančno ugotoviti, iz katere kaznive dejavnosti izvira premoženje, oziroma ne da bi bila potrebna predhodna ali istočasna obsodba za to kaznivo dejavnost, ob upoštevanju vseh relevantnih okoliščin in dokazov.
It should be possible for Member States, in line with their national legal systems, to ensure this by means other than legislation.
Moralo bi biti mogoče, da države članice v skladu s svojimi nacionalnimi pravnimi sistemi to zagotovijo z drugimi sredstvi kot z zakonodajo.
Prosecutions for money laundering should also not be impeded by the fact that the criminal activity was committed in another Member State or in a third country, subject to the conditions set out in this Directive.
Pregona pranja denarja prav tako ne bi smelo ovirati zgolj dejstvo, da je bila kazniva dejavnost storjena v drugi državi članici ali v tretji državi, ob upoštevanju pogojev iz te direktive.
This Directive aims to criminalise money laundering when it is committed intentionally and with the knowledge that the property was derived from criminal activity.
Namen te direktive je inkriminacija pranja denarja, kadar je storjeno naklepno in ob zavedanju, da je bilo premoženje pridobljeno s kaznivo dejavnostjo.
In that context, this Directive should not distinguish between situations where property has been derived directly from criminal activity and situations where it has been derived indirectly from criminal activity, in line with the broad definition of ‘proceeds’ as laid down in Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.
V zvezi s tem ta direktiva ne bi smela razlikovati med primeri, ko je bilo premoženje pridobljeno neposredno iz kaznive dejavnosti, in primeri, ko je bilo pridobljeno posredno iz kaznive dejavnosti, v skladu s široko opredelitvijo pojma „premoženjska korist“, kot je določeno v Direktivi 2014/42/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
In each case, when considering whether the property is derived from criminal activity and whether the person knew that, the specific circumstances of the case should be taken into account, such as the fact that the value of the property is disproportionate to the lawful income of the accused person and that the criminal activity and acquisition of property occurred within the same time frame.
V vsakem primeru, ko se ugotavlja, ali je bilo premoženje pridobljeno s kaznivo dejavnostjo in ali je zadevna oseba to vedela, bi bilo treba upoštevati posebne okoliščine primera, kot je na primer dejstvo, da je vrednost premoženja obdolženca nesorazmerna glede na njegove zakonite dohodke ter da sta si kazniva dejavnost in pridobitev premoženja časovno blizu.
Intention and knowledge can be inferred from objective, factual circumstances.
Na naklep in zavedanje je mogoče sklepati iz objektivnih dejanskih okoliščin.
As this Directive provides for minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of money laundering, Member States are free to adopt or maintain more stringent criminal law rules in that area.
Ker ta direktiva določa minimalna pravila glede opredelitev kaznivih dejanj in sankcij na področju pranja denarja, lahko države članice sprejmejo ali ohranijo strožja kazenskopravna pravila na tem področju.
Member States should be able, for example, to provide that money laundering committed recklessly or by serious negligence constitutes a criminal offence.
Države članice bi morale na primer imeti možnost določiti, da je pranje denarja, kadar je storjeno iz zavestne malomarnosti, kaznivo dejanje.
References in this Directive to money laundering committed by negligence should be understood as such for Member States that criminalise such conduct.
Sklicevanja na pranje denarja, storjeno iz malomarnosti, v tej direktivi bi bilo treba razumeti kot takšna za države članice, ki so inkriminirale tako ravnanje.
In order to deter money laundering throughout the Union, Member States should ensure that it is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least four years.
Da bi odvrnili od pranja denarja po vsej Uniji, bi države članice morale zagotoviti, da se kaznuje z najvišjo predpisano kaznijo zapora najmanj štirih let.
That obligation is without prejudice to the individualisation and application of penalties and the execution of sentences in accordance with the concrete circumstances in each individual case.
Ta obveznost ne posega v individualizacijo in izrekanje ter izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij v skladu z dejanskimi okoliščinami vsakega posameznega primera.
Member States should also provide for additional sanctions or measures, such as fines, temporary or permanent exclusion from access to public funding, including tender procedures, grants and concessions, temporary disqualifications from the practice of commercial activities or temporary bans on running for elected or public office.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti tudi dodatne sankcije ali ukrepe, kot so globe, začasna ali trajna izključitev iz dostopa do javnih sredstev, vključno s postopki javnega naročanja, nepovratnimi sredstvi in koncesijami, začasna prepoved opravljanja poslovnih dejavnosti ali začasna prepoved opravljanja voljene funkcije ali funkcije javnega uslužbenca.
That obligation is without prejudice to the discretion of the judge or the court to decide whether to impose additional sanctions or measures or not, taking into account all the circumstances of the particular case.
Ta obveznost ne posega v diskrecijsko pravico sodnika ali sodišča, da odloči, ali bo uporabil(o) dodatne sankcije ali ukrepe, pri čemer upošteva vse okoliščine posameznega primera.
While there is no obligation to increase sentences, Member States should ensure that the judge or the court is able to take the aggravating circumstances set out in this Directive into account when sentencing offenders.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da lahko sodnik ali sodišče ob izrekanju sankcij storilcem upošteva obteževalne okoliščine, določene v tej direktivi, čeprav ni zavezan(o) izreči strožje sankcije.
It remains within the discretion of the judge or the court to determine whether to increase the sentence due to the specific aggravating circumstances, taking into account all the facts of the particular case.
Sodnik ali sodišče ohrani diskrecijsko pravico, da odloči, ali bo izrekel strožjo sankcijo zaradi posebne obteževalne okoliščine, ob upoštevanju vseh dejstev posameznega primera.
Member States should not be obliged to provide for aggravating circumstances where national law provides for the criminal offences laid down in Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA or for offences committed by natural persons acting as obliged entities in the exercise of their professional activities to be punishable as separate criminal offences and this may lead to more severe sanctions.
Države članice ne bi smele biti zavezane določiti obteževalnih okoliščin, če so kazniva dejanja, določena v Okvirnem sklepu Sveta 2008/841/PNZ, ali kazniva dejanja, ki jih storijo fizične osebe, ki delujejo kot pooblaščeni subjekti pri izvajanju svojih poklicnih dejavnosti, v nacionalnem pravu opredeljena kot ločena kazniva dejanja, za katera se lahko izrečejo strožje sankcije.
The freezing and confiscation of the instrumentalities and proceeds of crime remove the financial incentives which drive crime.
Z začasnim zavarovanjem in odvzemom predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, in premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, se odpravijo finančne spodbude, ki vodijo h kaznivim dejanjem.
Directive 2014/42/EU lays down minimum rules on the freezing and confiscation of the instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in criminal matters.
Direktiva 2014/42/EU določa minimalna pravila o začasnem zavarovanju in odvzemu predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, in premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, v kazenskih zadevah.
That Directive also requires the Commission to report to the European Parliament and to the Council on its implementation and make adequate proposals if necessary.
Navedena direktiva prav tako zahteva, da Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poroča o njenem izvajanju in po potrebi pripravi ustrezne predloge.
Member States should, as a minimum, ensure the freezing and confiscation of the instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in all cases provided for in Directive 2014/42/EU.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti vsaj začasno zavarovanje in odvzem predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, in premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, v vseh primerih, ki jih določa Direktiva 2014/42/EU.
Member States should also strongly consider enabling confiscation in all cases where it is not possible to initiate or conclude criminal proceedings, including in cases where the offender has died.
Države članice bi morale tudi resno preučiti možnost odvzema v vseh primerih, ko kazenskega postopka ni mogoče začeti ali zaključiti, tudi v primerih, v katerih je storilec umrl.
As requested by the European Parliament and the Council in the statement accompanying Directive 2014/42/EU, the Commission will submit a report analysing the feasibility and possible benefits of introducing further common rules on the confiscation of property deriving from activities of a criminal nature, including in the absence of a conviction of a specific person or persons for those activities.
V skladu z zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v izjavi, ki spremlja Direktivo 2014/42/EU, bo Komisija predložila poročilo, v katerem bo analizirala izvedljivost in morebitne prednosti uvedbe nadaljnjih skupnih pravil o odvzemu premoženja, pridobljenega z dejavnostmi kaznive narave, tudi če določena oseba ali osebe niso bile obsojene za te dejavnosti.
Such analysis will take into account the differences between the legal traditions and systems of the Member States.
Takšna analiza bo upoštevala razlike med pravnimi izročili in sistemi držav članic.
Given the mobility of perpetrators and proceeds stemming from criminal activities, as well as the complex cross-border investigations required to combat money laundering, all Member States should establish their jurisdiction in order to enable the competent authorities to investigate and prosecute such activities.
Zaradi mobilnosti storilcev kaznivih dejanj in premoženjskih koristi, ki izvirajo iz kaznivih dejavnosti, ter zaradi zapletenih čezmejnih preiskav, potrebnih za boj proti pranju denarja, bi morale vse države članice določiti svojo pristojnost, da bi pristojnim organom omogočile preiskovanje in pregon tovrstnih dejavnosti.
Member States should thereby ensure that their jurisdiction includes situations where an offence is committed by means of information and communication technology from their territory, whether such technology is based on their territory or not.
Države članice bi tako morale zagotoviti, da v njihovo pristojnost spadajo primeri, ko je kaznivo dejanje storjeno z uporabo informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije z njihovega ozemlja, ne glede na to, ali se zadevna tehnologija nahaja na njihovem ozemlju.
Under Council Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA and Council Decision 2002/187/JHA, the competent authorities of two or more Member States conducting parallel criminal proceedings in respect of the same facts involving the same person are, with the assistance of Eurojust, to enter into direct consultations with one another, in particular to ensure that all offences covered by this Directive are prosecuted.
Na podlagi Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2009/948/PNZ in Sklepa Sveta 2002/187/PNZ se morajo pristojni organi dveh ali več držav članic, ki vodijo vzporedne kazenske postopke na podlagi istih dejstev zoper isto osebo, ob pomoči Eurojusta medsebojno neposredno posvetovati, zlasti za zagotovitev pregona vseh kaznivih dejanj, ki jih zajema ta direktiva.
To ensure the successful investigation and prosecution of money laundering offences, those responsible for investigating or prosecuting such offences should have the possibility to make use of effective investigative tools such as those which are used in combating organised crime or other serious crimes.
Za zagotovitev uspešnosti preiskovanja in pregona kaznivih dejanj pranja denarja bi morale imeti osebe, pooblaščene za preiskovanje ali pregon takih kaznivih dejanj, možnost uporabe učinkovitih preiskovalnih orodij, kot so na primer tiste, ki se uporabljajo v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu ali drugim hudim kaznivim dejanjem.
It should thereby be ensured that sufficient personnel and targeted training, resources and up-to-date technological capacity are available.
Zato bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da je na voljo dovolj osebja in ciljno usmerjeno usposabljanje, pa tudi sredstva in sodobne tehnološke zmogljivosti.
The use of such tools, in accordance with national law, should be targeted and take into account the principle of proportionality and the nature and seriousness of the offences under investigation and should respect the right to the protection of personal data.
Uporaba teh orodij v skladu z nacionalnim pravom bi morala biti ciljno usmerjena in upoštevati načelo sorazmernosti ter naravo in težo preiskovanih kaznivih dejanj, spoštovati pa bi morala tudi pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov.
This Directive replaces certain provisions of Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA for the Member States bound by this Directive.
Ta direktiva za države članice, ki jih zavezuje, nadomesti nekatere določbe Okvirnega Sklepa 2001/500/PNZ.
This Directive respects the principles recognised by Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), respects fundamental rights and freedoms and observes the principles recognised, in particular, by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including those set out in Titles II, III, V and VI thereof which encompass, inter alia, the right to respect for private and family life and the right to protection of personal data, the principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties, covering also the requirement of precision, clarity and foreseeability in criminal law, the presumption of innocence, as well as the rights of suspects and accused persons to have access to a lawyer, the right not to incriminate oneself and the right to a fair trial.
Ta direktiva upošteva načeli iz člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), spoštuje temeljne pravice in svoboščine ter upošteva načela, ki jih zlasti priznava Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, tudi tista iz naslovov II, III, V in VI Listine, ki med drugim zajemajo pravico do zasebnega in družinskega življenja in pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov, načeli zakonitosti in sorazmernosti kaznivih dejanj in sankcij, ki vsebujejo tudi zahtevo po natančnosti, jasnosti in predvidljivosti v kazenskem pravu, domnevo nedolžnosti, kot tudi pravico osumljencev in obdolžencev do dostopa do odvetnika ter pravico posameznika, da ne izpove zoper sebe, in pravico do poštenega sojenja.
This Directive has to be implemented in accordance with those rights and principles, taking also into account the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and other human rights obligations under international law.
To direktivo je treba izvajati v skladu s temi pravicami in načeli, tudi ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah ter drugih obveznosti na področju človekovih pravic na podlagi mednarodnega prava.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to subject money laundering in all Member States to effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of this Directive, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the TEU.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer določiti, da v vseh državah članicah za pranje denarja veljajo učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne kazenske sankcije, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega in učinkov te direktive lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 PEU.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, the United Kingdom and Ireland are not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and are not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 21 o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, in brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola ti dve državi članici ne sodelujeta pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanju ni zavezujoča in se v njiju ne uporablja.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 22 o stališču Danske, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v tej državi ne uporablja.
Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA continues to be binding upon and applicable to Denmark,
Okvirni sklep 2001/500/PNZ je za Dansko še naprej zavezujoč in se v njej uporablja –
This Directive establishes minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of money laundering.
Ta direktiva določa minimalna pravila glede opredelitve kaznivih dejanj in sankcij na področju pranja denarja.
This Directive does not apply to money laundering as regards property derived from criminal offences affecting the Union’s financial interests, which is subject to specific rules laid down in Directive (EU) 2017/1371.
Ta direktiva se ne uporablja za pranje denarja v zvezi s premoženjem, pridobljenim s kaznivimi dejanji, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, in za katero veljajo posebna pravila, določena v Direktivi (EU) 2017/1371.
‘criminal activity’ means any kind of criminal involvement in the commission of any offence punishable, in accordance with national law, by deprivation of liberty or a detention order for a maximum of more than one year or, as regards Member States that have a minimum threshold for offences in their legal systems, any offence punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order for a minimum of more than six months.
„kazniva dejavnost“ pomeni vsako kaznivo udeležbo pri storitvi katerega koli kaznivega dejanja, ki se v skladu z nacionalnim pravom kaznuje z odvzemom prostosti ali z varnostnim ukrepom z najvišjo predpisano kaznijo nad enim letom, ali v primeru držav članic, katerih pravni sistem določa minimalni prag za kazniva dejanja, katerega koli kaznivega dejanja, ki se kaznuje z odvzemom prostosti ali z varnostnim ukrepom, z najnižjo predpisano kaznijo nad šestimi meseci.
In any case, offences within the following categories are considered a criminal activity:
V vsakem primeru kazniva dejanja znotraj naslednjih kategorij pomenijo kaznivo dejavnost:
participation in an organised criminal group and racketeering, including any offence set out in Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA;
sodelovanje v organizirani hudodelski združbi in izsiljevanje, vključno s katerim koli kaznivim dejanjem iz Okvirnega sklepa 2008/841/PNZ;
terrorism, including any offence set out in Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
terorizem, vključno s katerim koli kaznivim dejanjem iz Direktive (EU) 2017/541 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta;
trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling, including any offence set out in Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Framework Decision 2002/946/JHA;
trgovina z ljudmi in tihotapljenje migrantov, vključno s katerim koli kaznivim dejanjem iz Direktive 2011/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/946/PNZ;