natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As of this date, the compatibility of the aid under the form of public service compensation has to be examined in light of the 2011 SGEI Decision and the 2011 SGEI Framework's criteria.
Kot je bilo že navedeno, se sprva dejansko ni zagotovilo nobeno nadomestilo, saj so se storitve štele za gospodarsko uspešne s komercialnega vidika.
As was already the case under the 2005 SGEI Decision, the 2011 SGEI Decision is only applicable to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to undertakings in connection with a SGEI which complies with the Maritime Cabotage Regulation.
V skladu z odstavkom 21 okvira SSGP iz leta 2012 „[z]nesek nadomestila ne sme presegati zneska, ki je nujen za kritje neto stroškov izpolnjevanja obveznosti javne storitve, vključno z zmernim dobičkom“.
In the 2012 Decision, the Commission took the preliminary view that, by directly entrusting the operation of the services to Saremar, the Italian authorities did not observe Article 4(1) of the Maritime Cabotage Regulation on non-discriminatory treatment of ship-owners.
V skladu z odstavkom 24 okvira SSGP iz leta 2012 je treba neto stroške, potrebne za izpolnjevanje obveznosti javnih storitev, izračunati na podlagi primerjave stanja izvajalca, če izvaja obveznosti javnih storitev ali ne.
RAS has claimed during the formal investigation procedure that Saremar qualified as an internal operator of the Region.
V tem primeru se tak izračun ni opravil.
According to RAS, it can be drawn from the case law that the application of the principle of non-discrimination is precluded, provided that the control exercised over the operator by a public authority is similar to that which the authority exercises over its own departments and the operator carries out the essential part of its activities with the controlling authority.
Obveznosti glede preglednosti pa tudi niso bile izpolnjene.
It would appear that indeed Saremar acts on behalf of RAS as an instrument for the implementation of RAS's maritime transport and regional development policies.
Komisija zato sklene, da nadomestilo, dodeljeno družbi Saremar za izvajanje storitev, ni združljivo z notranjim trgom na podlagi okvira SSGP iz leta 2011.
It is however unclear whether that circumstance can justify the direct and exclusive award of compensation to Saremar.
Med preiskavo je RAS predložila dve glavni trditvi v zvezi z dokapitalizacijo: prvič, ukrep je bil izveden le delno, in drugič, zadeval je financiranje, do katerega je bila družba Saremar zakonito upravičena.
In any event, the Commission does not need to decide on this issue for the purpose of this case, given that the aid measure does not comply with the 2011 SGEI Decision.
Kljub temu Komisija meni, da je družba Saremar podjetje v težavah v smislu smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje in je zato upravičena do prejetja pomoči za prestrukturiranje.
Applicability of the 2011 SGEI Decision
Dokapitalizacijo sestavlja pomoč za prestrukturiranje, ki mora biti ocenjena na podlagi smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, da se določi, ali je lahko združljiva z notranjim trgom v skladu s členom 107(3) PDEU.
The 2011 SGEI Decision only applies to aid under the form of public service compensation in connection to genuine SGEI services.
Ker merila o združljivosti iz smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje niso izpolnjena (glej zlasti razloge v uvodni izjavah od 272 do 279), Komisija sklepa, da nadomestilo, plačano družbi Saremar, pomeni pomoč za prestrukturiranje za podjetje v težavah.
On the basis of the grounds developed in recitals 180-218 above, the Commission concludes that RAS has neither demonstrated to the required legal standards the existence of a real public service need justifying the imposition of public service obligations on the routes in question, nor that those obligations were sufficiently precise.
Ukrepa zato ni mogoče šteti za združljivega z notranjim trgom.
Consequently, the subsidy granted to Saremar for the operation of the two routes cannot be considered as compatible aid pursuant to the 2011 SGEI Decision.
SKLEPNE UGOTOVITVE
In any event, in order to be deemed compatible and exempted from the notification requirement by virtue of the 2011 SGEI Decision, the operation of a SGEI necessarily has to be entrusted by way of one or more acts, laying down:
Naslednji ukrepi, ki jih je izvedla RAS v korist družbe Saremar, pomenijo državno pomoč, ki ni združljiva z notranjim trgom:
The content and duration of the PSOs;
nadomestilo v višini 10 milijonov EUR za upravljanje dveh dodatnih poti, ki povezujeta Sardinijo s celino, ki je bilo dodeljeno na podlagi Deželnega zakona 15 z dne 7. avgusta 2012 in je bilo družbi Saremar izplačano v dveh obrokih, in sicer 6. novembra 2012 in 3. decembra 2012;
The undertaking and, where applicable, the territory concerned;
dokapitalizacija v višini 6099961 EUR, za katero se je sprejel sklep 15. junija 2012 (od katere je bilo 824309,69 EUR plačanih 11. julija 2012).
The nature of any exclusive or special rights assigned to the undertaking;
Plačilo promocijskih dejavnosti in priporočilna pisma ne vključujejo državne pomoči družbi Saremar.
A description of the compensation mechanism and the parameters for calculating, controlling and reviewing the compensation;
Zadevni ukrepi pomoči so nezdružljivi z notranjim trgom.
The arrangements for avoiding and recovering any overcompensation;
Italija je nezakonito izvedla zadevne pomoči, s čimer je kršila člen 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
A reference to the 2011 SGEI Decision.
V skladu s PDEU in ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča je Komisija pristojna za odločanje, ali mora zadevna država članica ukiniti ali spremeniti pomoč, za katero je ugotovila, da je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
It is manifest that in this case the entrustment acts do not meet the requirements under letter (d), (e) and (f), above.
Prav tako Sodišče dosledno meni, da je namen obveznosti države, da ukine pomoč, za katero Komisija meni, da ni združljiva z notranjim trgom, ponovna vzpostavitev prejšnjih razmer.
Therefore, the aid in question cannot be considered as compatible on the basis of the 2011 SGEI Decision.
V zvezi s tem je Sodišče navedlo, da je ta cilj dosežen, ko prejemnik odplača znesek, ki mu je bil dodeljen v okviru nezakonite pomoči, s čimer izgubi prednost, ki jo je užival glede na konkurente na trgu, ter se ponovno vzpostavijo razmere pred plačilom pomoči.
According to RAS, the measure has been defined in its main elements before the entry into force of the new SGEI package and, therefore, the 2005 SGEI Decision, rather than the 2011 SGEI Decision, would be applicable for the purpose of compatibility assessment.
V skladu z navedeno sodno prakso je v členu 14 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 določeno, da „če se v primerih nezakonite pomoči sprejmejo negativne odločbe, Komisija odloči, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da upravičenec vrne pomoč“.
However, in this case the compensation was granted only in August 2012 by Regional Law 15 of 7 August 2012 and therefore does not pre-date the entry into force of the 2011 SGEI Decision.
Torej ker se ukrepi, opredeljeni v uvodni izjavi 300, štejejo za nezakonito in nezdružljivo državno pomoč, je treba že dodeljen znesek pomoči teh ukrepov, tj. 10824309,69 EUR, vrniti, da se ponovno vzpostavijo razmere, ki so obstajale na trgu pred dodelitvijo pomoči.
RAS's argument is therefore untenable.
Ta sklep ne zadeva drugih vprašanj iz sklepov iz leta 2011 in 2012 ali posega vanje ali na katere so Komisijo opozorile zainteresirane strani med preiskavo, ki se je začela na podlagi navedenih sklepov, –
In conclusion, aid to Saremar cannot be deemed compatible and exempted from the notification requirement on the basis of the 2011 SGEI Decision.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
In any event, given the absence of any provision setting a compensation for the operation of the two routes, and of the arrangements for avoiding and recovering any overcompensation, the compensation in question cannot be considered compatible and exempted from the notification requirement on the basis of the 2005 SGEI Decision either.
Člen 1
Saremar is an undertaking in difficulty within the meaning of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines
Ukrepi državne pomoči, dodeljene družbi Saremar v obliki nadomestila za javno storitev na podlagi Deželnega zakona 15 z dne 7. avgusta 2012 in v obliki kapitalskega vložka, določenega na skupščini delničarjev družbe Saremar 15. junija 2012, niso združljivi z notranjim trgom.
For the reasons set out below, the Commission considers that Saremar can be considered as an undertaking in difficulty within the meaning of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines at the time the compensation in question was granted to it.
Navedeno pomoč je nezakonito izvajala Italija v nasprotju s členom 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
According to point 9 of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines, a firm is regarded to be in difficulty if it is unable to recover through its own resources or by rising the funds it needs from shareholders or on the market, and if without the intervention of public authorities it will almost certainly go out of business.
Člen 2
In particular, according to point 10 of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines a firm is regarded to be in difficulty:
Italija od upravičenca izterja nezdružljivo pomoč iz člena 1(1).
in the case of a limited liability company, where more than half of its registered capital has disappeared and more than one quarter of that capital has been lost over the preceding 12 months;
K zneskom, ki jih je treba vrniti, se prištejejo obresti za obdobje od datuma, ko je bila pomoč dana na voljo prejemniku, do datuma njenega dejanskega vračila.
when in a case of a company where at least some members have unlimited liability for the debt of the company, where more than half of its capital as shown in the company accounts has disappeared and more than one quarter has been lost in the preceding 12 months;
Obresti se izračunajo z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 271/2008, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 794/2004.
whatever type of company concerned, where it fulfils the criteria under its domestic law for being the subject of collective insolvency proceedings.
Člen 3
Point 11 of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines provides that even when none of the circumstances set out in point 10 are present, a firm may still be considered as being in difficulty and lists some of the usual signs of such a situation, such as: increasing losses, diminishing turnover, growing stock inventories, excess capacity, declining cash flow, mounting debt, rising interest charges and falling or nil asset value.
Vračilo pomoči iz člena 1 se izvede takoj in učinkovito.
Saremar had a EUR 5253530 loss in 2010.
Italija zagotovi, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih po datumu priglasitve tega sklepa.
Despite the fact that the company experienced a EUR 2523439 profit in 2011 this result was not enough to cover the losses incurred in 2010.
Člen 4
In fact the 2010 losses were twice higher than the 2011 surplus.
Italija v dveh mesecih od datuma priglasitve tega sklepa predloži naslednje informacije:
The 2010 loss was carried over to 2012 and covered by a reduction in the company's capital from EUR 6099961 to EUR 1209010,64.
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora upravičenec vrniti;
Therefore, in 2011 Saremar lost over 80 % of its capital and must be regarded as a company in difficulties under point 10 of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines.
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s tem sklepom;
Based on Saremar's 2012 balance sheet the company still recorded a EUR 1,7 million loss in 2012.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da se je od upravičenca zahtevalo vračilo pomoči.
As mentioned in recital 157 above, the Commission notes that Saremar itself considered its financial situation in 2012 as critical.
Italija obvešča Komisijo o napredku v zvezi z nacionalnimi ukrepi, sprejetimi za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler pomoč, dodeljena na podlagi sheme iz člena 1, ni v celoti vrnjena.
This state of facts has been reflected by Decision 41/23/EC adopted by RAS on 15 October 2012.
Na zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži vse informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
The Decision mentioned a Note dated 4 October 2012 submitted by Saremar's President, by which the latter informed RAS, inter alia, that unless the provisions of Regional Law 15 of 7 August 2012 laying down a EUR 10 million subsidy to the company were immediately enforced, the company's indebtedness would call into question the continuity of its activity, with significant impact on both the public service and on the envisaged privatisation of the company.
Prav tako predloži podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestnih merah za vračilo pomoči, ki jih je upravičenec že vrnil.
Given the continuous losses, the liquidity problems and the analysis made by Saremar itself, the Commission concludes that the company must be considered a company in difficulty also on the basis of point 11 of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines.
Člen 5
In 2012, the financial difficulties of the Saremar were eased by the grating in November/December 2012 of the compensation subject to the current assessment.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Italijansko republiko.
Had Saremar not received these sums it would have recorded a EUR 13 million loss in 2012.
V Bruslju, 22. januarja 2014
According to point 9 of the 2011 SGEI Framework, SGEI compensation granted to firms in difficulty must be assessed under the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines.
Za Komisijo
Given that the conditions set out in the 2011 SGEI Decision are not fulfilled, the compensation received by Saremar in difficulty for the operation of the two routes in question must be assessed under the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines, in order to establish whether it may be declared compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3) TFEU.
Podpredsednik
The company did not receive any rescue or restructuring aid in last 10 years.
UL C 28, 1.2.2012, str. 18, in UL C 84, 22.3.2013, str. 58.
Hence, the Commission finds that the company complies with the ‘one time, last time’ principle, as set out in point 72 et seq. of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines.
UL C 28, 1.2.2012, str. 18.
However, all the conditions laid down in the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines must be respected for State aid to a company in difficulty to be considered compatible with the internal market in accordance with Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Nekdanjo skupino Tirrenia so leta 2004 ustanovile družbe Tirrenia di Navigazione S.p.A, Saremar – Sardegna Regionale Marittima S.p.A., Toremar – Toscana Regionale Marittima S.p.A., Siremar – Sicilia Regionale Marittima S.p.A. in Caremar – Campania Regionale Marittima S.p.A.
First, pursuant to point 13 of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines a firm belonging to a larger business group is not normally eligible for restructuring aid, except where it can be demonstrated that the firm's difficulties are its own and are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group, and that the difficulties are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself.
UL C 84, 22.3.2013, str. 58.
Second, in order to consider a measure compatible under points 34 - 37 of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines, the restructuring plan has to analyse in detail the problems which have led to the difficulties and to set out the means by which to restore the long-term viability and health of the firm within a reasonable timescale.
Na podlagi zakona iz leta 2009 se je podružnica, ki je upravljala povezave z otoki Pontino Archipelago, ločila od družbe Caremar in se je premestila v deželo Lacij.
This has to be done on the basis of realistic assumptions as to future operating conditions with scenarios reflecting best-case, worst-case and intermediate assumptions and the firm's specific strengths and weaknesses.
Člen 19(b)(10) zakona iz leta 2009.
The plan must be submitted in all relevant detail to the Commission and include, in particular, a market survey.
Zadeva I743 – Cene prevoza s trajektom na Sardinijo/s Sardinije, o domnevni kršitvi člena 101 PDEU s strani zasebnih konkurentov (Onorato Participazioni S.r.l., Moby S.p.a., Marinsvest S.r.l., Investitori Associati SGR S.p.a., Grandi Navi Veloci S.p.a., SNAV S.p.a., Lotta Maritime S.A., Forship S.p.a, Clessidra SGR S.p.a. in L19 S.p.a.) na nekaterih linijah, ki povezujejo Sardinijo in celino.
It is true that RAS submitted Saremar's business plan for the period 2011 - 2022, however that plan does not comply with the requirements of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines.
3 dni na teden od 1. junija 2012 do 19. junija 2012 in od 4. septembra 2012 do 15. septembra 2012.
In this case Saremar's business plan was approved in July 2010, before the compensation was granted by RAS and it was not predicated on the idea that such measure would be adopted in favour of Saremar.
Relazione sul Rendiconto generale della Regione autonoma della Sardegna per l'esercizio finanziario 2012, str. 359, na voljo na: http://www.corteconti.it/export/sites/portalecdc/_documenti/controllo/sezioni_riunite/sezioni_riunite_regione_sardegna/2013/relazione_parifixa.pdf.
The plan was based on the assumption that the company would be partially privatised (RAS initially intended to divest 49 % of its stake in the company) by November 2010 and covered the twelve-year duration of the new public service contract sought to be signed with the buyer at the end of 2010.
Družba SNAV je upravljala pot Olbia–Civitavecchia do maja 2011, ko jo je nadomestila družba GNV.
The plan does not present in detail the circumstances leading to the difficulties of the company, nor does it describe the means to restore its long term viability and makes no reference to the operation by Saremar of two links between Sardinia and the mainland.
Glej opombo 8.
On this basis the Commission considers that the measure has not been conditioned on the implementation of a business plan fulfilling the requirements of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines, which is sufficient to exclude its compatibility with the internal market.
Sklep organa NCA št. 24033 z dne 31. oktobra 2012, SP136 – Saremar–Sardegna Regionale Marittima/Routes Civitavecchia–Golfo degli Aranci e Vado Ligure–Porto Torres.
Third, measures must be taken to ensure that the aid's adverse effects on trading conditions are mitigated as far as possible.
Družbo CIN so novembra 2010 ustanovile družbe Grimaldi, Marinvest in Moby, da bi sodelovale v razpisu za pridobitev družbe Tirrenia.
The aid shall not unduly distort competition.
Na začetku leta 2011 je družba Marinvest (ki je nadzorovala SNAV) pridobila nadzor nad družbo GNV in prav tako je družba Moby marca 2011 prenesla svoj delež v družbi CIN na svojega večinskega delničarja, družbo Onorato Participazioni.
This usually means a limitation of the presence which the company can enjoy on its markets at the end of the restructuring period.
Tako sta bila marca 2011 glavna delničarja družbe CIN družba Onorato Participazioni (ki je nadzorovala družbo Moby) in družba Marinvest (ki je nadzorovala družbi GNV in SNAV).
The compensatory measures should be in proportion to the distortive effects of the aid and, in particular, to the size and relative importance of the firm on its market or markets.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 z dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij (Uredba ES o združitvah) (UL L 24, 29.1.2004, str. 1).
The degree of compensatory measures must be established on a case-by-case basis and with regard to the objective of restoring the long-term-viability of the firm.
S Sklepom št. 23650 z dne 21. junija 2012, C11613, je organ NCA družbi CIN pogojno odobril pridobitev podružnice Tirrenia v skupni lasti družb Moby (40 %), L19 (30 %), Gruppo Investimenti Portuali S.p.A.
Moreover, according to point 7 of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines the Commission will request compensatory measures which minimise the effect on competitors.
(20 %) in Shipping Investment S.r.l.
RAS did not propose any compensatory measure in compensation for the potential distortion of competition caused by the granting of the aid.
Organ NCA je uvedel nekatere pogoje, med drugim v zvezi z neuporabo sporazumov o prevozih pod skupno oznako med družbama Moby in CIN v obdobju 2012–2016 in uporabo voznin na poteh Civitavecchia–Olbia, Genova–Porto Torres in Genova–Olbia za ohranitev povprečnega prihodka na enoto, ki ga je pridobila družba Moby poleti 2009 (razen povišanja, ki se neposredno pripiše povišanju stroškov goriva).
Fourth, the aid must be limited to the strict minimum, necessary to enable the restructuring.
Družba CIN/Tirrenia bo nadomestila družbo Moby na poti Genova–Porto Torres.
The beneficiary is expected to make a significant contribution to the restructuring plan from its own resources, including the sale of assets not essential to the company's survival, or from external financing at market conditions.
Na poti Civitavecchia–Olbia bosta družbi Moby in CIN v poletnih sezonah leta 2013 in 2014 na druge upravljalce prenesli 10 % zmogljivosti.
Such contribution must be real, i.e. actual, excluding all future profits such as cash flow, and is a sign that the markets believe in the feasibility of the return to viability of the company.
Družba SNAV je tradicionalno upravljala pot do maja 2011.
In this case no own contribution was foreseen.
Sklep organa NCA št. 24418 z dne 18. junija 2013, C11613B.
The Commission concludes that the subsidy granted to Saremar to cover the deficit resulted from the operation in 2011 and 2012 of the two routes to mainland Italy constitutes incompatible aid to Saremar in difficulty.
Po uporabi zakonske rezerve in zaslužkov iz prejšnjih finančnih let.
For the sake of completeness, the Commission has also checked if the aid in question would have been compatible with the 2011 SGEI Framework had Saremar not been a company in difficulty at the moment it was granted.
Zadeva C-280/00 – Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, Recueil 2003, I-7747.
Genuine service of general economic interest as referred to in Article 106 of the Treaty
Odločba Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str. 67).
As indicated in paragraph 56 of the 2011 SGEI Framework, Member States have a wide margin of discretion regarding the nature of services that could be classified as SGEIs.
Sklep Komisije 2012/21/EU z dne 20. decembra 2011 o uporabi člena 106(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljenega nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (UL L 7, 11.1.2012, str. 3).
The Commission's task is to ensure that the margin of discretion is applied without manifest error as regards the definition of the SGEI.
UL C 8, 11.1.2012, str. 15.
On the basis of the grounds developed under recitals 188 - 210, the Commission considers that this condition has not been observed in this case.
Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega potniškega prevoza ter o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 in št. 1107/70 (UL L 315, 3.12.2007, str. 1).
Need for an entrustment act specifying the PSOs and the methods of calculating compensation
Uredba (ES) št. 1008/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. septembra 2008 o skupnih pravilih za opravljanje zračnih prevozov v Skupnosti (UL L 293, 31.10.2008, str. 3).
In accordance with section 2.3 of the 2011 SGEI Framework, the concept of SGEI within the meaning of Article 106 TFEU means that the undertaking in question has been entrusted with the operation of the SGEI by way of one or more official acts.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 3577/92 z dne 7. decembra 1992 o uporabi načela prostega pretoka storitev v pomorskem prometu med državami članicami (pomorska kabotaža) (UL L 364, 12.12.1992, str. 7).
These acts must specify, in particular:
Poročilo navaja Relazione al bilancio 2011.