natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the relevant conditions were not met as the Commission did not find any consistent and distinct difference in functions and prices of the Union industry between their OEM and non-OEM sales on the Union market at the level of product types, within the meaning of Article 2(10)(d)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar ustrezni pogoji niso bili izpolnjeni, saj Komisija ni našla doslednih in izrazitih razlik v funkcijah in cenah industrije Unije med prodajo proizvajalcev originalne opreme in prodajo drugih proizvajalcev na trgu Unije na ravni vrst izdelkov v smislu člena 2(10)(d)(i) osnovne uredbe.
Article 2(10)(d)(ii) of the basic Regulation was equally inapplicable as the relevant level of trade – OEM – does exist on the domestic market of Union producers.
Tudi člena 2(10)(d)(ii) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče uporabiti, saj ustrezna raven trgovanja – proizvajalcev originalne opreme – obstaja na domačem trgu proizvajalcev Unije.
The Commission also considered making an Article 2(10)(k) (‘other factors’) adjustment to account for the design and R & D costs of the brand-name importers.
Komisija je proučila tudi prilagoditev na podlagi člena 2(10)(k) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: drugi dejavniki), da bi se upoštevali stroški oblikovanja ter raziskav in razvoja, ki jih imajo uvozniki blagovnih znamk.
However, at this stage of the investigation, the exporting producers did not provide the Commission with a reliable quantification of these costs.
Vendar proizvajalci izvozniki v tej fazi preiskave Komisiji niso predložili zanesljive količinske opredelitve teh stroškov.
The Commission accordingly invites interested parties to provide it with reliable and verifiable quantification of costs for an adjustment under Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija zato zainteresirane strani poziva, naj ji predložijo zanesljivo in preverljivo količinsko opredelitev stroškov za prilagoditev na podlagi člena 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe.
The claim of the CCCME was therefore rejected.
Trditev zbornice CCCME je bila zato zavrnjena.
According to three sampled exporting producers the product type classification proposed by the Commission was insufficient to distinguish electric bicycles of different price levels.
Po navedbah treh vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov klasifikacija vrste izdelka, ki jo je predlagala Komisija, ni zadoščala za razlikovanje električnih koles z različnimi ravnmi cen.
They requested the Commission to add several characteristics to the product type classification, namely:
Od Komisije so zahtevali, da klasifikaciji vrste izdelka doda več lastnosti, namreč:
Derailleur – to reflect the difference between external derailleur and internal derailleur;
menjalnik – zaradi razlikovanja med zunanjim in notranjim menjalnikom;
Brake – to reflect the difference between mechanical and hydraulic brake;
zavora – zaradi razlikovanja med mehansko in hidravlično zavoro;
Suspension – to reflect the difference between spring suspension, hydraulic suspension and air suspension; and
vzmetenje – zaradi razlikovanja med vzmetnim, hidravličnim in zračnim vzmetenjem, ter
Battery characteristics – add two capacity ranges – below 250Wh and between 250Wh and 350Wh.
lastnosti akumulatorja – in dva razpona zmogljivosti – pod 250 Wh ter med 250 Wh in 350 Wh.
The complainant, on the other hand, argued that different parts within each proposed characteristic do not have per se different prices.
Pritožnik je po drugi strani trdil, da se cene različnih delov v okviru vsake predlagane lastnosti same po sebi ne razlikujejo.
Furthermore, electric bicycles with allegedly more expensive parts within each proposed characteristic do not have to be more expensive than those containing the allegedly cheaper part.
Poleg tega ni nujno, da so električna kolesa z domnevno dražjimi deli v okviru posamezne predlagane lastnosti dražja od tistih z domnevno cenejšim delom.
The complainant provided several examples of this.
Pritožnik je to podkrepil z več primeri.
The exporting producers, in turn, disagreed, pointing out, for instance, that in its examples the complainant compares a high-end external derailleur (with 10 speeds) with low-end internal derailleur (with three speeds).
Proizvajalci izvozniki se s tem niso strinjali, pri čemer so na primer poudarili, da pritožnik v svojih primerih zunanji menjalnik višjega cenovnega razreda (z 10 hitrostmi) primerja z notranjim menjalnikom nižjega cenovnega razreda (s tremi hitrostmi).
This would be why the price is similar.
Zato je cena podobna.
Similarly, high-end mechanical breaks are being compared with low-end hydraulic breaks.
Podobno se mehanske zavore višjega cenovnega razreda primerjajo s hidravličnimi zavorami nižjega cenovnega razreda.
The exporting producer also pointed out that the comparison of bicycles containing different parts to prove that these parts do not affect the price of the whole bicycle is meaningless as in each example there are other differentiating factors than the parts in question.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je poudaril tudi, da je primerjava koles z različnimi deli, da bi se dokazalo, da ti deli ne vplivajo na ceno celotnega kolesa, nesmiselna, saj v vsakem primeru obstajajo drugi različni dejavniki, ne le zadevni deli.
The Commission took note of both sets of comments.
Komisija je upoštevala oba sklopa pripomb.
Regarding the additional characteristics, the Commission notes that it has not been able to establish that an internal derailleur would always be significantly more expensive than an external one or that a hydraulic break will always be significantly more expensive than a mechanical one.
Kar zadeva dodatne lastnosti, Komisija opozarja, da ni mogla ugotoviti, da bi bil notranji menjalnik vedno precej dražji od zunanjega ali da bo hidravlična zavora vedno precej dražja od mehanskega.
Within those sub-categories there are parts that are on the high and on the low–end of the price spectrum.
Te podkategorije vključujejo dele, ki so na zgornjem in spodnjem koncu cenovnega razpona.
The Commission therefore concluded that there does not appear to be a consistent significant price difference between parts within the proposed additional characteristics that would warrant changes to the product types established in this investigation.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da očitno ni dosledne večje razlike v cenah med deli v okviru predlaganih dodatnih lastnosti, ki bi upravičila spremembe vrst izdelkov, določenih v tej preiskavi.
At this stage of the investigation, there was no evidence justifying adjustments based on price differences of parts within the characteristics mentioned above, as well as the additional characteristics claimed later by the exporting producers (namely the number of derailleur speeds and the brand of the central motor).
V tej fazi preiskave ni bilo dokazov, ki bi upravičili prilagoditve na podlagi razlike v cenah delov v okviru navedenih lastnosti, pa tudi dodatnih lastnosti, ki so jih pozneje navedli proizvajalci izvozniki (tj. število hitrosti menjalnika in znamka centralnega motorja).
Chinese electric bicycles exported to the Union use a mix of parts within these characteristics, which, to the best of the Commission's knowledge, does not favour a particular type.
V kitajskih električnih kolesih, ki se izvažajo v Unijo, se uporabljajo različni deli v okviru teh lastnosti, ki po vedenju Komisije ne dajejo prednosti določeni vrsti.
The same can be said about the electric bicycles produced in the Union.
Enako je mogoče trditi za električna kolesa, proizvedena v Uniji.
Again, the Commission invited interested parties to provide it with such verifiable evidence and information in order to complete its assessment on the above arguments.
Komisija je ponovno pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj ji predložijo take preverljive dokaze in informacije, da bo lahko končala presojo navedenih argumentov.
The dumping margin for the cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample was established in accordance with the provisions of Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja dampinga za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, je bila določena v skladu z določbami člena 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
With regard to all other exporting producers in the PRC, the Commission determined the level of cooperation in the PRC.
V zvezi z vsemi drugimi proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK je Komisija določila raven sodelovanja v LRK.
It was measured by assessing the proportion of the volume of exports of the cooperating exporting producers to the Union out of the total export volume from the country concerned to the Union.
To je izmerila tako, da je ocenila delež obsega izvoza sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Unijo v skupnem obsegu izvoza iz zadevne države v Unijo.
Therefore, the residual dumping margin applicable to all other exporting producers in the PRC was provisionally set at a level corresponding to the highest dumping margin found for the cooperating exporting producers in the sample.
Zato je bila preostala stopnja dampinga, ki velja za vse druge proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, začasno določena na ravni, ki ustreza najvišji stopnji dampinga, ugotovljeni za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike v vzorcu.
Giant Electric Vehicle (Kunshan) Co., Ltd
Giant Electric Vehicle (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.
Jinhua Vision Industry Co., Ltd and Yongkang Hulong Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd
Jinhua Vision Industry Co., Ltd in Yongkang Hulong Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd.
Cooperating exporting producers not sampled (see Annex)
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec (glej Prilogo)
At the start of the period considered, forty-one producers manufactured the like product in the Union.
Na začetku obravnavanega obdobja je podoben izdelek v Uniji proizvajalo 41 proizvajalcev.
Four of them stopped their production during the investigation period.
Štirje od njih so v obdobju preiskave ustavili proizvodnjo.
The total Union production during the investigation period was established at around 1,1 million pieces.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je celotna proizvodnja Unije v obdobju preiskave znašala približno 1,1 milijona kosov.
The Commission established the figure on the basis of the consumption figure submitted by the Confederation of the European Bicycle Industry (‘CONEBI’), import statistics, and the ratio of sales to production of the sampled Union producers.
Komisija je ta podatek določila na podlagi podatkov o potrošnji, ki jih je predložila Konfederacija evropske industrije koles (v nadaljnjem besedilu: konfederacija CONEBI), statističnih podatkov o uvozu ter razmerjem med prodajo in proizvodnjo vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
One interested party submitted that two Union producers are also importers of electric bicycles.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da sta zadevna proizvajalca Unije tudi uvoznika električnih koles.
They however did not claim that these producers should be excluded from the definition of the Union industry, or provide arguments why they should be excluded.
Vendar ni trdila, da bi morala biti ta proizvajalca izključena iz opredelitve industrije Unije, ali predložila argumentov za njuno izključitev.
Imports per se do not constitute a reason for exclusion from the definition of the Union industry.
Uvoz sam po sebi ni razlog za izključitev iz opredelitve industrije Unije.
Another party claimed that company ATALA and its related company Accell Nederland should not form part of the Union industry because ATALA imports electric bicycles from the PRC.
Druga stran je trdila, da družba ATALA in njena povezana družba Accell Nederland ne bi smela biti del industrije Unije, ker družba ATALA uvaža električna kolesa iz LRK.
According to the conditions of Article 4(2) of the basic Regulation ATALA and Accell are not related.
V skladu s pogoji iz člena 4(2) osnovne uredbe družbi ATALA in Acceell nista povezani.
In any case, imports per se do not constitute a reason for exclusion from the definition of the Union industry.
Vsekakor pa uvoz sam po sebi ni razlog za izključitev iz opredelitve industrije Unije.
Other Union producers requesting confidentiality have reported imports from the PRC.
Drugi proizvajalci Unije, ki so zahtevali zaupnost, so poročali o uvozu iz LRK.
These companies together with those mentioned in recitals 130 and 131 account for less than 5 % of production and sales of the Union industry.
Te družbe skupaj z družbami iz uvodnih izjav 130 in 131 predstavljajo manj kot 5 % proizvodnje in prodaje industrije Unije.
They therefore have no material impact on the injury indicators of the Union industry as a whole.
Zato ne vplivajo bistveno na kazalnike škode industrije Unije kot celote.
Whether or not those companies are considered to be part of the Union industry has no material impact on the injury analysis.
To, ali se navedene družbe štejejo za del industrije Unije ali ne, ne vpliva bistveno na analizo škode.
This issue will be further examined for the final findings.
To vprašanje bo nadalje obravnavano, da se sprejmejo končne ugotovitve.
The Commission established the Union consumption on the basis of the information submitted by CONEBI.
Komisija je potrošnjo Unije določila na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila konfederacija CONEBI.
Union consumption developed as follows:
Potrošnja Unije se je gibala, kot sledi.
Union consumption (pieces)
Potrošnja Unije (v kosih)
Source: CONEBI.
Vir: Konfederacija CONEBI.
Total Union consumption (pieces)
Celotna potrošnja Unije (v kosih)
Union consumption increased steadily from 1,1 million pieces in 2014 to almost 2 million pieces during the investigation period, reflecting a growth of 74 % during the period considered.
Potrošnja Unije se je stalno povečevala z 1,1 milijona kosov leta 2014 na skoraj 2 milijona kosov v obdobju preiskave, kar odraža 74-odstotno rast v obravnavanem obdobju.
This development was due to greater environmental awareness and continued investment in marketing and promotion, and in the technological development of electric bicycles.
Ta razvoj je bil posledica večje okoljske ozaveščenosti in nadaljnjih naložb v trženje in promocijo ter v tehnološki razvoj električnih koles.
Since 2017, electric bicycles have been classified under CN code 87116010.
Od leta 2017 so električna kolesa uvrščena pod oznako KN 87116010.
Before 2017, electric bicycles were classified under (ex) CN code 87119010 under which other products were included.
Pred letom 2017 so bila električna kolesa uvrščena pod oznako (ex) KN 87119010, pod katero so bili vključeni drugi izdelki.
To overcome this issue, the complainant submitted detailed Chinese customs statistics in which it was able to identify Chinese exports of electric bicycles.
Da bi se ta težava odpravila, je pritožnik predložil podrobne statistične podatke kitajskih carinskih organov, s katerimi je lahko opredelil kitajski izvoz električnih koles.
The Commission established the volume of imports on the basis of Eurostat data by extrapolating to the relevant HS code the ratio of Chinese exports of electric bicycles (as established above) on total exports from the PRC under the same HS code.
Komisija je obseg uvoza določila na podlagi podatkov Eurostata tako, da je v ustrezno oznako HS ekstrapolirala razmerje kitajskega izvoza električnih koles (kot je bilo določeno zgoraj) glede na skupni izvoz iz LRK pod isto oznako HS.
For the nine months of 2017, the Chinese import statistics are directly based on Eurostat.
Kitajski statistični podatki o uvozu za devet mesecev leta 2017 neposredno temeljijo na podatkih Eurostata.
The market share of the imports was then established by comparing import volumes with the Union consumption as shown in Table 2 in recital 134.
Tržni delež uvoza je bil nato določen tako, da se je obseg uvoza primerjal s potrošnjo Unije, kot je prikazano v preglednici 2 uvodne izjave 134.
Imports into the Union from the PRC developed as follows:
Uvoz iz LRK v Unijo se je gibal, kot sledi.
Import volume (pieces) and market share
Obseg uvoza (v kosih) in tržni delež
Source: Eurostat, Chinese export statistics.
Vir: Eurostat, kitajski statistični podatki o izvozu.
Volume of imports from the PRC (pieces)
Obseg uvoza iz LRK (v kosih)
The volume of imports from the PRC more than tripled, increasing from close to 200000 pieces in 2014 to close to 700000 pieces in the investigation period.
Obseg uvoza iz LRK se je več kot potrojil, in sicer se je s skoraj 200000 kosov leta 2014 povečal na skoraj 700000 kosov v obdobju preiskave.
The pace of growth accelerated between 2016 and the investigation period.
Rast se je povečala med letom 2016 in obdobjem preiskave.
In parallel, the share of the Union market held by imports from the PRC has increased from 17 % in 2014 to 35 % in the investigation period.
Hkrati se je delež trga Unije, ki ga je imel uvoz iz LRK, povečal s 17 % leta 2014 na 35 % v obdobju preiskave.
The CCCME expressed its concerns regarding the reliability of the Chinese customs statistics submitted by the complainant and requested to disclose the detailed statistics and the source of these data.
Zbornica CCCME je izrazila pomisleke glede zanesljivosti statističnih podatkov kitajskih carinskih organov, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, ter zahtevala, naj razkrije podrobne statistične podatke in vir teh podatkov.
The complainant made available to the Commission the detailed statistics used to support its complaint.
Pritožnik je Komisiji dal na voljo podrobne statistične podatke, ki jih je uporabil za utemeljitev svoje pritožbe.
The complainant also made available, on the non-confidential version of the complaint, the aggregated export figures per year.
Prav tako je v nezaupni različici pritožbe razkril zbirne podatke o izvozu po letih.
The complainant furthermore indicated that the source was the Chinese customs, mentioned the codes used, and explained its methodology to exclude other products than the product concerned.
Poleg tega je navedel, da so bili vir kitajski carinski organi, navedel je uporabljene oznake in pojasnil svojo metodologijo za izključitev drugih izdelkov, ki niso zadevni izdelek.
The Commission established through a verification of this data that the complainant had purchased these customs statistics from a long-established Chinese company specialising in this field, and that the same information was available from other Chinese service providers.
Komisija je s preverjanjem teh podatkov ugotovila, da je pritožnik te statistične podatke carinskih organov kupil pri uveljavljeni kitajski družbi, specializirani za to področje, in da imajo enake informacije na voljo tudi drugi kitajski ponudniki storitev.
On the other hand, the verification also evidenced that the complainant had accurately described in the open file the methodology followed to determine the exports of electric bicycles from the PRC.
Po drugi strani se je s preverjanjem tudi dokazalo, da je pritožnik v javno dostopni dokumentaciji točno opisal metodologijo, uporabljeno za določitev izvoza električnih koles iz LRK.
In addition, the detailed data submitted by the complainant was cross-checked against other sources of information and proved to be reliable.
Poleg tega so bili podrobni podatki, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, navzkrižno preverjeni glede na druge vire informacij in so se izkazali za zanesljive.
No other party proposed alternative source of information or methodology.
Nobena druga stran ni predlagala alternativnega vira informacij ali alternativne metodologije.
The Commission also established that the detailed data and the identity of the company supplying this information were by nature confidential within the meaning of Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je ugotovila tudi, da so podrobni podatki in identiteta družbe, ki je zagotovila te informacije, po naravi zaupni v smislu člena 19(1) osnovne uredbe.
Disclosing the identity of the supplier of the information would have a significant adverse effect upon the person supplying the information or upon the person from whom the information has been acquired.
Razkritje identitete družbe, ki je zagotovila informacije, bi imelo znaten škodljiv učinek na osebo, ki je zagotovila informacije, ali na osebo, od katere so bile informacije pridobljene.
In these circumstances, and given the level of disclosure of aggregated data and methodology on the non-confidential file, the Commission considered that the input data and the identity of the company reselling them are not necessary for the party concerned to exercise their rights of defence.
V teh okoliščinah ter glede na raven razkritja zbirnih podatkov in metodologije v nezaupni dokumentaciji je Komisija menila, da zadevna stran za uveljavljanje svojih pravic do obrambe ne potrebuje vhodnih podatkov in identitete družbe, ki jih je preprodala.
CCCME's argument had therefore to be rejected.
Argument zbornice CCCME je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Interested parties claimed that imports from the PRC have followed the market trends, since both the consumption in the Union and Chinese exports were growing.
Zainteresirane strani so trdile, da je uvoz iz LRK sledil tržnim trendom, saj sta se potrošnja v Uniji in tudi kitajski izvoz povečevala.
It is however noted that the magnitude of growth between Chinese exports and the consumption in the Union is very different.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da sta obsega rasti kitajskega izvoza in potrošnje v Uniji zelo različna.
Between 2014 and the investigation period, Chinese imports grew by 250 %, while the consumption in the Union increased at a much slower pace by 74 %.
Kitajski uvoz se je med letom 2014 in obdobjem preiskave povečal za 250 %, potrošnja v Uniji pa se je precej počasneje povečala, in sicer za 74 %.
So while the trend was certainly the same, the magnitude of increase was very different.
Trend je bil zagotovo enak, vendar je bil obseg povečanja precej drugačen.
Prices of the imports from the PRC and price undercutting
Cene uvoza iz LRK in nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen
The Commission established the prices of imports on the basis of Eurostat data following the method described under recital 137.
Komisija je cene uvoza določila na podlagi podatkov Eurostata v skladu z metodo, opisano v uvodni izjavi (137).
The average price of imports into the Union from the PRC developed as follows:
Povprečna cena uvoza iz LRK v Unijo se je gibala, kot sledi.
Import prices (EUR/piece)
Uvozne cene (v EUR/kos)
The average price of imports from the PRC decreased by 11 % between 2014 and the investigation period, with a first decline of 4 % between 2014 and 2015 and a second decline of 12 % between 2016 and the investigation period.
Povprečna cena uvoza iz LRK se je med letom 2014 in obdobjem preiskave znižala za 11 %, pri čemer se je najprej znižala za 4 % med letoma 2014 in 2015, nato pa za 12 % med letom 2016 in obdobjem preiskave.
As the detailed product type mix was not known due to the general nature of the Eurostat statistics, the evolution of prices is not completely reliable.
Ker podroben nabor vrst izdelkov ni bil znan zaradi splošne narave statističnih podatkov Eurostata, razvoj cen ni popolnoma zanesljiv.
However, the Commission noted that the average prices of imports from the PRC were markedly below those of both Union producers' and imports from other third countries than the PRC.
Vendar je Komisija ugotovila, da so bile povprečne cene uvoza iz LRK bistveno nižje od cen proizvajalcev Unije in uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav razen LRK.
In addition, while Chinese exporters expanded the range of products sold in the Union market and included more expensive electric bicycles, the average price of Chinese imports decreased.
Poleg tega se je, čeprav so kitajski izvozniki razširili paleto izdelkov, ki so se prodajali na trgu Unije, in vključili dražja električna kolesa, povprečna cena kitajskega uvoza znižala.
the weighted average sales prices per product type of the four sampled Union producers charged to unrelated customers on the Union market, adjusted to an ex-works level; and
tehtane povprečne prodajne cene štirih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije za posamezno vrsto izdelka, zaračunane nepovezanim strankam na trgu Unije in prilagojene na raven cene franko tovarna, ter