natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Concerning criterion 1, the Giant group claimed that the price of aluminium used in the production of electric bicycles was in line with international prices, as reflected on the London Metal Exchange (‘LME’).
Skupina Giant Group je v zvezi z merilom št. 1 trdila, da je bila cena aluminija, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji električnih koles, v skladu z mednarodnimi cenami na londonski borzi kovin (v nadaljnjem besedilu: borza LME).
Alternatively, it submitted that the resulting distortion could not be qualified as significant because in value terms the impact of the alleged distortion was de minimis.
V nasprotju s tem je navedla, da nastalega izkrivljanja ni mogoče opredeliti kot znatnega, ker je bil v smislu vrednosti učinek domnevnega izkrivljanja de minimis.
As the Commission explained at length in the disclosure document, the SHFE is designed in a way that the Chinese government can exercise complete control over the aluminium market.
Kot je Komisija na dolgo pojasnila v dokumentu o razkritju, je šanghajska borza kovin (v nadaljnjem besedilu: borza SHFE) zasnovana tako, da lahko kitajska vlada popolnoma nadzoruje trg aluminija.
Whether that influence is used to set prices at market level or not, or based on other considerations and hence at a fluctuating deviance of the market level, is irrelevant for finding significant State interference.
Za ugotovitev glede bistvenega vmešavanja države ni pomembno, ali se navedeni vpliv uporabi za določitev cen na tržni ravni ali ne ali pa na podlagi drugih premislekov in s tem ob spreminjajoči se deviantnosti tržne ravni.
The criterion of significant State interference is fulfilled where the State can influence prices not only marginally, but can exercise significant control, independently of how it actually exercises that control.
Merilo bistvenega vmešavanja države je izpolnjeno, kadar država nima le možnosti za neznaten vpliv na cene, ampak lahko izvaja precejšen nadzor, ne glede na to, kako ga dejansko izvaja.
The fact that the proportion of aluminium used in the production of electric bicycles is lower than in other products does not change the fact that electric bicycle producers operate in a significantly distorted market.
Dejstvo, da je delež aluminija, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji električnih koles, manjši kot pri drugih izdelkih, ne spremeni dejstva, da proizvajalci električnih koles delujejo na znatno izkrivljenem trgu.
In this particular case, and irrespective of its value, the Commission established, on the basis of the facts collected during the investigation, that the aluminium frame (produced from aluminium tubes) is one of the most essential elements for the production of an electric bicycles with knock on effects on all other parts and components.
V tem konkretnem primeru in ne glede na njegovo vrednost je Komisija na podlagi dejstev, zbranih med preiskavo, ugotovila, da je okvir iz aluminija (proizveden iz aluminijastih cevi) eden od najpomembnejših elementov za proizvodnjo električnih koles, ki posredno vpliva na vse druge dele in sestavne dele.
With regard to criterion 3, the Giant group argued that the benefit resulting from the differential taxation rate is the expression of the legitimate industrial policy objectives of the PRC and cannot be considered as a distortion carried over from a former non-market economy.
V zvezi z merilom št. 3 je skupina Giant Group trdila, da je korist, ki izhaja iz diferenciranih stopenj obdavčitve, izraz legitimnih ciljev industrijske politike LRK in se ne more šteti za izkrivljanje, ki se prenaša še iz predhodnega netržnega gospodarstva.
In addition, the Giant group claimed that distortions, if any, are not significant.
Poleg tega je trdila, da izkrivljanja, če so kakšna, niso znatna.
The group further claimed that an incorrect methodology was applied to determine whether the preferential grant of land use rights constituted a significant distortion since it did not amortise the benefit received over the life period of the asset.
Skupina je trdila še, da je bila za določitev, ali je prednostna dodelitev pravic do uporabe zemljišč pomenila znatno izkrivljanje, uporabljena neustrezna metodologija, saj se prejete ugodnosti niso amortizirale v življenjskem obdobju sredstva.
The Commission disagreed that the a qualification as significant distortion within the meaning of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation bears any legal or factual correlation to the concept of ‘benefit’ within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘the basic anti-subsidy Regulation’).
Komisija se ni strinjala, da ima opredelitev kot znatno izkrivljanje v smislu člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe kakršno koli pravno ali dejansko povezavo s pojmom „ugodnost“ v smislu Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna protisubvencijska uredba).
Rather, it is a concept intrinsic to the present assessment under Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Namesto tega gre za pojem, ki je sestavni del te ocene na podlagi člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission found that two companies of the group received almost complete refund of the land use right price, while a third one paid a small percentage of the value of the land use right price after refund.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bila dvema družbama skupine skoraj v celoti povrnjena cena pravice do uporabe zemljišč, tretja pa je po povračilu plačala majhen odstotek vrednosti cene pravice do uporabe zemljišč.
Given the nature of the industry where land is the most important asset and significant in nature, the Commission could only conclude that the production costs and financial situation of the company are subject to significant distortions carried over from the non-market economy system.
Glede na naravo industrije, v kateri je zemljišče najpomembnejše sredstvo in pomembno po naravi, je Komisija lahko sklenila le, da so proizvodni stroški in finančni položaj družbe podvrženi znatnemu izkrivljanju, ki se prenaša iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
The conclusion to deny the MET claim of the Giant group therefore remains unchanged.
Sklep o zavrnitvi zahtevka skupine Giant Group za TGO zato ostaja nespremenjen.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation normal value was determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country (‘analogue country’) for the exporting producers not granted MET.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se je normalna vrednost določila na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: primerljiva država) za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim ni bila odobrena TGO.
For this purpose, a market economy third country had to be selected.
V ta namen je bilo treba izbrati tretjo državo s tržnim gospodarstvom.
In addition to Switzerland, Japan and Taiwan, which were mentioned in the Notice of Initiation, the Commission tried to identify producers of the product under investigation in Australia, Mexico, South Korea, Thailand, Turkey and the USA.
Komisija je poleg Švice, Japonske in Tajvana, ki so bili navedeni v obvestilu o začetku, poskušala najti proizvajalce izdelka v preiskavi v Avstraliji, Mehiki, Južni Koreji, na Tajskem, v Turčiji in ZDA.
Based on the information received, the Commission asked twenty-seven known producers of the like product to provide information.
Na podlagi prejetih informacij je zaprosila 27 znanih proizvajalcev podobnega izdelka, naj predložijo informacije.
One producer in Switzerland and one producer in Taiwan replied to the analogue country producers' questionnaire.
Vprašalnik, poslan proizvajalcem iz primerljive države, sta izpolnila en proizvajalec v Švici in en proizvajalec v Tajvanu.
The reply from the producer in Taiwan was lacking essential information, including a cost of production per product type and a domestic sales listing.
V vprašalniku, ki ga je izpolnil proizvajalec v Tajvanu, so manjkale bistvene informacije, vključno s stroški proizvodnje na vrsto izdelka in seznamom domače prodaje.
Despite the Commission's requests, the producer did not complete the reply, leaving Switzerland as the only potential analogue country.
Proizvajalec kljub zahtevam Komisije ni do konca izpolnil vprašalnika, zaradi česar je Švica edina morebitna primerljiva država.
The CCCME argued that Switzerland would be inappropriate as an analogue country for several reasons.
Zbornica CCCME je trdila, da Švica za primerljivo državo ne bi bila primerna iz več razlogov.
First, the Swiss electric bicycles are different from Chinese – they have a central motor whereas Chinese electric bicycles have predominantly hub motors (mounted in the wheels), which are different technologies.
Prvič, švicarska električna kolesa se razlikujejo od kitajskih – imajo centralni motor, kitajska električna kolesa pa imajo največkrat motor v pestu (nameščen na kolesu), kar sta različni tehnologiji.
The Swiss also use parts that are significantly different (more powerful central motors, GPS-enabled controllers, touch-screen displays etc.)
Prav tako Švicarji uporabljajo dele, ki so bistveno drugačni (močnejši centralni motorji, upravljavci z GPS, zasloni na dotik itd.).
Second, Swiss producers produce their own brands whereas Chinese are mainly original equipment manufacturers (‘OEM’) for the Union importers.
Drugič, švicarski proizvajalci proizvajajo lastne znamke, kitajski pa so zlasti proizvajalci originalne opreme za uvoznike Unije.
Third, the overall production scale in Switzerland is much smaller than the one in the PRC.
Tretjič, celotni obseg proizvodnje v Švici je precej manjši od tistega v LRK.
Forth, the Swiss import their parts from the Union and Japan, whereas the Chinese source domestically.
Četrtič, švicarski proizvajalci svoje dele uvažajo iz Unije in Japonske, kitajski pa jih pridobijo na domačem trgu.
Finally, out of the eight Swiss producers, three only import complete electric bicycles from Taiwan and resell, and the largest producer imports all parts from abroad and only assembles in Switzerland.
Nazadnje, od osmih švicarskih proizvajalcev le trije uvažajo celotna električna kolesa iz Tajvana in jih preprodajo, največji proizvajalec pa vse dele uvaža iz tujine in jih v Švici le sestavi.
The CEIEB also argued that Switzerland would be inappropriate as the analogue country.
Združenje CEIEB je prav tako trdilo, da Švica ne bi bila primerna za primerljivo državo.
It pointed out that that Switzerland has a very different level of development from the PRC and thus different production costs (especially labour).
Poudarilo je, da je stopnja razvoja v Švici zelo drugačna od tiste v LRK, zato ima Švica drugačne proizvodne stroške (zlasti stroške dela).
Furthermore, no other market in the world has such a high share of speed electric bicycles, which, due to legally required type-approval, are generally more costly.
Poleg tega noben drug trg na svetu nima tako velikega deleža hitrih električnih koles, ki so zaradi zakonsko zahtevane homologacije na splošno dražja.
The investigation confirmed that, whilst a vast majority of electric bicycles exported to the Union from the PRC by the sampled exporting producers have hub motors, all electric bicycles sold on the Swiss market by the cooperating analogue country producer during the IP have central motors.
Preiskava je potrdila, da ima velika večina električnih koles, ki so jih vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK izvažali v Unijo, motor v pestu, vsa električna kolesa, ki jih je sodelujoči proizvajalec iz primerljive države v OP prodal na švicarskem trgu, pa imajo centralne motorje.
Alongside the battery, the motor is usually the single most expensive part of an electric bicycle.
Motor je poleg akumulatorja po navadi najdražji del električnega kolesa.
Central and hub motors are two distinct technologies with different technical specifications and level of complexity.
Centralni motor in motor v pestu sta dve različni tehnologiji, ki imata različne tehnične specifikacije in sta različno zapleteni.
Central motors not only have a different price than hub motors, but a use of one over another has a knock-on effect on other parts.
Centralni motorji imajo drugačno ceno kot motorji v pestu, uporaba enega namesto drugega pa posredno vpliva na druge dele.
For instance, an electric bicycle with a central motor would have a different, often more expensive, frame, designed to fit the motor.
Električno kolo s centralnim motorjem bi na primer imelo drugačen, pogosto dražji okvir, ki je zasnovan tako, da se prilega motorju.
The same would be true for wheels in case of electric bicycles with hub motors.
To velja tudi za kolesa v primeru električnih koles z motorji v pestu.
Certain additional parts, like special motor holders, are necessary for electric bicycles with central motor but not necessary for those with hub motors.
Pri električnih kolesih s centralnim motorjem so potrebni nekateri dodatni deli, kot so posebni nosilci za motor, ki pa pri tistih z motorji v pestu niso potrebni.
Other parts, like torque sensors, are different depending on the type of the motor.
Drugi deli, kot so tipala navora, se razlikujejo glede na vrsto motorja.
Considering that these are two different technologies with different cost structures and prices, the use of Switzerland as the analogue country would not provide the Commission with a normal value for a vast majority of imports, due to the knock on effect referred to above and the difficulty of quantifying adjustments that would be necessary to adjust the normal value from Switzerland to match the product types exported from China to the Union.
Ker sta to dve različni tehnologiji z različnimi strukturami stroškov in cenami, Komisija z uporabo Švice kot primerljive države ne bi pridobila normalne vrednosti za veliko večino uvoza, in sicer zaradi navedenega posrednega vpliva in težav pri količinski opredelitvi prilagoditev, potrebnih za prilagoditev normalne vrednosti iz Švice, da bi ustrezala vrstam izdelkov, ki se iz Kitajske izvažajo v Unijo.
The Commission further looked at the cooperating analogue country producer's export to other countries, but those were also exclusively of electric bicycles with central motors.
Komisija je nadalje proučila izvoz sodelujočega proizvajalca iz primerljive države v druge države, vendar je tudi ta izvoz zajemal izključno električna kolesa s centralnimi motorji.
The Commission therefore concluded at this stage that Switzerland is not an appropriate analogue country under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je zato v tej fazi sklenila, da Švica ni ustrezna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, in absence of an appropriate market economy third country, it was provisionally concluded in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, that it was not possible to determine normal value for the sampled producers based on the domestic prices or constructed normal value in a market economy third country or the price from such a third country to other countries, including the Union, and that it was therefore necessary to determine normal value based on any other reasonable basis, in this case on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product.
Zato je Komisija ob odsotnosti primerne tretje države s tržnim gospodarstvom v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe začasno sklenila, da ni mogoče določiti normalne vrednosti za vzorčene proizvajalce na podlagi domačih cen, konstruirane normalne vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom ali cen pri izvozu iz takih tretjih držav v druge države, vključno z Unijo, in da je zato treba določiti normalno vrednost na podlagi katere koli druge razumne osnove, v tem primeru na podlagi cen, ki so se v Uniji dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo za podobni izdelek.
This was considered appropriate due to the inappropriateness of Switzerland and the lack of any other cooperation as mentioned in recitals 96 and 99 to (102).
To se je zdelo primerno zaradi neprimernosti Švice in odsotnosti kakršnega koli drugega sodelovanja, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi (96) in uvodnih izjavah od (99) do (102).
In addition, the Commission deemed this justified due to the size of the Union market, the existence of imports, and the strong internal competition on the Union market for this product.
Poleg tega je Komisija menila, da je to upravičeno zaradi velikosti trga Unije, obstoja uvoza in močne notranje konkurence na trgu Unije za ta izdelek.
As MET was not granted in this case, the normal value for all Chinese exporting producers was determined, as explained in recital 103 above, on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product on the basis of the data verified at the premises of the sampled Union producers listed in recital 51.
Ker v tem primeru TGO ni bila odobrena, je bila normalna vrednost za vse kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, kot je bilo pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (103), določena na podlagi cen, ki so se v Uniji dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo za podobni izdelek, na podlagi podatkov, preverjenih v prostorih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije iz uvodne izjave (51).
The normal value of each product type was based on the actual sales price (ex-works), adjusted to include the target profit of the Union industry.
Normalna vrednost vsake vrste izdelka temelji na dejanski prodajni ceni (franko tovarna), prilagojeni tako, da vključuje ciljni dobiček industrije Unije.
The vast majority of product types exported from the PRC to the Union could be matched with the product types produced and sold in the Union.
Veliko večino vrst izdelka, izvoženih iz LRK v Unijo, je bilo mogoče povezati z vrstami izdelka, proizvedenimi in prodanimi v Uniji.
In the rare cases where the exact matching on the level of the product control number (‘PCN’) was not possible, the Commission iteratively removed the PCN characteristics until a successful match was found.
V redkih primerih, kjer natančno ujemanje na ravni kontrolne številke izdelka ni bilo mogoče, je Komisija dobesedno odstranjevala lastnosti iz kontrolne številka izdelka, dokler ni bila pri ujemanju uspešna.
In some exceptional cases, where the particular bicycle types were not produced in the Union, the closest possible match based on other characteristics was done.
V nekaterih izjemnih primerih, kjer se določene vrste koles niso proizvajale v Uniji, se je doseglo čim bližje ujemanje na podlagi drugih lastnosti.
The details of this procedure have been disclosed to the exporting producers.
Podrobnosti tega postopka so bile razkrite proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
The sampled exporting producers exported to the Union directly to independent customers or through related or unrelated companies acting as an importer.
Vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki so v Unijo izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam ali prek povezanih ali nepovezanih družb, ki so delovale kot uvoznice.
If the exporting producers exported the product concerned directly to independent customers in the Union, the export price was the price actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Če so proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi dejansko plačane ali plačljive cene za zadevni izdelek, ko je bil prodan za izvoz v Unijo.
If the exporting producers exported the product concerned to the Union through related companies acting as an importer, the export price was taken as established on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Če so proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek izvažali v Unijo prek povezanih družb, ki so delovale kot uvoznice, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek prvič preprodan neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
In those cases, adjustments to the price were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including SG&A expenses and profits (9 %).
V teh primerih so bile prilagoditve cene izvedene za vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in preprodajo, vključno s prodajnimi, splošnimi in administrativnimi stroški, ter za dobiček (9 %).
The Commission made the following adjustments to the export price using the data provided by the sampled exporting producers in their questionnaire replies and during the verification visits: bank charges, handling and loading charges in the exporting country, credit costs, and profits for the unrelated traders in case of the related traders in the Union.
Komisija je izvedla naslednje prilagoditve izvozne cene z uporabo podatkov, ki so jih predložili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki v izpolnjenih vprašalnikih in med preveritvenimi obiski: bančni stroški, stroški manipuliranja in natovarjanja v državi izvoznici, stroški kredita in dobiček za nepovezane trgovce v primeru povezanih trgovcev v Uniji.
The CCCME and one sampled exporting producer argued that in order to secure a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, the latter should be adjusted upwards on account of the exporting producers being OEM.
Zbornica CCCME in en vzorčen proizvajalec izvoznik sta trdila, da bi bilo treba za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno to slednjo prilagoditi navzgor, ker so proizvajalci izvozniki proizvajalci originalne opreme.
The CCCME argued that as most of Chinese electric bicycles producers are OEM, electric bicycles produced by them are sold to final consumers through brand-name importers and distributors.
Zbornica CCCME je trdila, da ker je večina proizvajalcev električnih koles proizvajalcev originalne opreme, se električna kolesa, ki jih ti proizvajajo, končnim potrošnikom prodajajo prek uvoznikov in distributerjev blagovne znamke.
The price charged to final consumers includes both the brand importer's mark-up and distributor's mark-up.
Cena, ki se zaračuna končnim potrošnikom, vključuje pribitek uvoznika blagovne znamke in pribitek distributerja.
The CCCME noted that, brand importers in the electric bicycles industry are different from ordinary importers in other industries.
Zbornica CCCME je opozorila, da se uvozniki blagovnih znamk v industriji električnih koles razlikujejo od običajnih uvoznikov v drugih panogah.
The CCCME noted that the reason for that would be that, for most electric bicycles exported from the PRC to the Union, the design, research and development is done by the brand importers or by the brand importers in cooperation with the exporter.
Opozorila je, da je razlog za navedeno ta, da za večino električnih koles, izvoženih iz LRK v Unijo, oblikovanje, raziskave in razvoj izvajajo uvozniki blagovnih znamk ali uvozniki blagovnih znamk v sodelovanju z izvoznikom.
In either case, the brand importers have made a significant investment into this work, much like the Union producers themselves.
Vsekakor uvozniki blagovne znamke veliko vložijo v to delo, podobno kot sami proizvajalci Unije.
Beyond the import price, the brand importers will add their own brand value into their re-sale price.
Uvozniki blagovne znamke bodo v svojo ceno za ponovno prodajo poleg uvozne cene dodali svojo lastno vrednost blagovne znamke.
Thus, the export price of Chinese electric bicycles should be adjusted upward by adding the brand importer's mark-up before being compared with the normal value.
Zato bi bilo treba izvozno ceno kitajskih električnih koles prilagoditi navzgor, tako da se ji pred primerjavo z normalno vrednostjo prišteje pribitek uvoznika blagovne znamke.
The Commission considered making an appropriate adjustment under Article 2(10)(d) (‘level of trade’) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je proučila ustrezno prilagoditev na podlagi člena 2(10)(d) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: raven trgovanja) osnovne uredbe.