natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters
o podpisu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Novo Zelandijo o sodelovanju in vzajemni upravni pomoči v carinskih zadevah v imenu Evropske unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207, in conjunction with Article 218(5), thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 207 v povezavi s členom 218(5) Pogodbe,
On 22 July 2013, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with New Zealand with a view to concluding an Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (‘the Agreement’).
Svet je 22. julija 2013 Komisijo pooblastil za začetek pogajanj z Novo Zelandijo z namenom sklenitve Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Novo Zelandijo o sodelovanju in vzajemni upravni pomoči v carinskih zadevah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum).
The negotiations were successfully concluded by the initialling of the Agreement on 23 September 2015.
Pogajanja so se uspešno zaključila s parafiranjem Sporazuma dne 23. septembra 2015.
The purpose of the Agreement is to establish the legal basis for a cooperation framework which aims to secure the supply chain and facilitate legitimate trade, as well as enable the exchange of information to ensure the proper application of customs legislation and the prevention, investigation and combating of breaches of customs legislation.
Namen Sporazuma je vzpostaviti pravno podlago za okvir sodelovanja, katerega cilj je zagotoviti varnost dobavne verige, olajšati zakonito trgovino ter omogočiti izmenjavo informacij, da se zagotovijo pravilna uporaba carinske zakonodaje ter preprečevanje in preiskovanje kršitev carinske zakonodaje ter boj proti njim.
The Agreement should be signed,
Sporazum bi bilo treba podpisati –
The signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of that Agreement.
Podpis, v imenu Unije, Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Novo Zelandijo o sodelovanju in vzajemni upravni pomoči v carinskih zadevah se odobri s pridržkom sklenitve navedenega sporazuma.
Done at Luxembourg, 10 October 2016.
V Luxembourgu, 10. oktobra 2016
Council Decision (EU) 2018/601
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2018/601
on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters
o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Novo Zelandijo o sodelovanju in vzajemni upravni pomoči v carinskih zadevah, v imenu Evropske unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a), thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 207 v povezavi s členom 218(6)(a) Pogodbe,
In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2018/600, the Agreement was signed on 3 July 2017.
Sporazum bi bilo treba odobriti –
The purpose of the Agreement is to establish the legal basis for a cooperation framework which aims to secure the supply chain and facilitate legitimate trade, as well as enable the exchange of information to ensure the proper application of customs legislation and the prevention, investigation and combating of breaches of customs legislation.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The Agreement should be approved,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Sporazum med Evropsko unijo in Novo Zelandijo o sodelovanju in vzajemni upravni pomoči v carinskih zadevah se odobri v imenu Unije.
The Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
Člen 2
The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.
Predsednik Sveta v imenu Unije predloži uradno obvestilo iz člena 21(1) Sporazuma.
The President of the Council shall give, on behalf of the Union, the notification provided for in Article 21(1) of the Agreement.
Ta sklep začne veljati na dan sprejetja.
Article 3
V Luxembourgu, 16. aprila 2018
For the Council
Odobritev z dne 13. marca 2018 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
R. Porodzanov
Generalni sekretariat Sveta bo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavil datum začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma.
Consent of 13 March 2018 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Pogajanja so se uspešno zaključila s parafiranjem Sporazuma dne 23. septembra 2015.
Council Decision (EU) 2018/600 of 10 October 2016 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (see page 3 of this Official Journal).
V skladu s Sklepom Sveta (EU) 2018/600 je bil Sporazum podpisan dne 3. julija 2017.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/611
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2018/611
On 27 May 2016 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/849, which sets out restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK).
Svet je 27. maja 2016 sprejel Sklep (SZVP) 2016/849, ki določa omejevalne ukrepe proti Demokratični ljudski republiki Koreji (DLRK).
The DPRK is continuing its nuclear and ballistic programmes in breach of its obligations as set out in several United Nations Security Council resolutions.
DLRK še naprej izvaja svoje jedrske in balistične programe, s čimer krši svoje obveznosti, določene v več resolucijah Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov.
Those programmes are financed in part by illicit transfers of funds and economic resources.
Te programe delno financira z nedovoljenimi prenosi sredstev in gospodarskih virov.
Four persons who provided for the transfer of assets or resources that could financially contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes should be added to the list of persons and entities in Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849.
Na seznam oseb in subjektov v Prilogi II k Sklepu (SZVP) 2016/849 bi bilo treba dodati štiri osebe, ki so zagotovile prenos premoženja ali virov, ki bi lahko finančno prispevali k programom DLRK, povezanim z jedrskim orožjem, balističnimi izstrelki ali drugim orožjem za množično uničevanje.
Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Prilogo II k Sklepu (SZVP) 2016/849 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti
Done at Brussels, 19 April 2018.
V Bruslju, 19. aprila 2018
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 of 27 May 2016 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and repealing Decision 2013/183/CFSP (OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 79).
PRILOGA
ANNEX
Priloga II k Sklepu (SZVP) 2016/849 se spremeni:
Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 is amended as follows:
naslov II se nadomesti z naslednjim:
heading II is replaced by the following:
Osebe in subjekti, ki zagotavljajo finančne storitve ali prenos premoženja ali virov, ki bi lahko prispevali k programom DLRK, povezanim z jedrskim orožjem, balističnimi izstrelki ali drugim orožjem za množično uničevanje“;
Persons and entities providing financial services or the transfer of assets or resources that could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes’;
v naslovu II se v podnaslovu „A. Osebe“ dodajo naslednji vnosi:
under heading II, the following entries are added under the subheading ‘A. Persons’:
Ime
Alias
Podatki za ugotavljanje istovetnosti
Date of designation
Utemeljitev
Statement of Reasons
Datum rojstva: 2.12.1947
DOB: 2.12.1947
Kraj rojstva: Sinuju, DLRK
POB: Sinuju, DPRK
Skupina strokovnjakov je ugotovila, da je KIM Yong Nam agent urada Reconnaissance General Bureau, tj. subjekta, ki je na seznamu Združenih narodov.
KIM Yong Nam has been identified by the Panel of Experts as an agent of the Reconnaissance General Bureau, an entity which has been designated by the United Nations.
Ugotovila je tudi, da KIM Yong Nam in njegov sin KIM Su Gwang sodelujeta v vzorcu goljufivih finančnih praks, ki bi lahko prispeval k programom DLRK, povezanim z jedrskim orožjem, balističnimi izstrelki ali drugim orožjem za množično uničevanje.
He and his son KIM Su Gwang have been identified by the Panel of Experts as engaging in a pattern of deceptive financial practices which could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes.
KIM Yong Nam je v obdobju, ko je delal kot diplomat, odprl različne tekoče in varčevalne račune v Uniji ter sodeloval pri različnih večjih bančnih transferjih na bančne račune v Uniji oziroma na račune zunaj Unije, tudi na račune, odprte na ime sina KIMA Suja Gwanga in snahe KIM Kyong Hui.
KIM Yong Nam has opened various current and savings accounts in the Union and has been involved in various large bank transfers to bank accounts in the Union or to accounts outside the Union while working as a diplomat, including to accounts in the name of his son KIM Su Gwang and daughter-in-law KIM Kyong Hui.
Datum rojstva: 11.5.1950
DOB: 11.5.1950
Kraj rojstva: Kangwon
POB: Kangwon
DJANG Tcheul Hy skupaj z možem KIMOM Yongom Namom, sinom KIMOM Sujem Gwangom in snaho KIM Kyong Hui sodeluje v vzorcu goljufivih finančnih praks, ki bi lahko prispevale k programom DLRK, povezanim z jedrskim orožjem, balističnimi izstrelki ali drugim orožjem za množično uničevanje.
DJANG Tcheul Hy has been involved together with her husband KIM Yong Nam, her son KIM Su Gwang and her daughter-in-law KIM Kyong Hui in a pattern of deceptive financial practices which could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes.
Bila je imetnica več bančnih računov v Uniji, ki jih je na njeno ime odprl njen sin KIM Su Gwang.
She was the owner of several bank accounts in the Union which were opened by her son KIM Su Gwang in her name.
Sodelovala je tudi pri več bančnih transferjih z računov svoje snahe KIM Kyong Hui na bančne račune zunaj Unije.
She was also involved in several bank transfers from accounts from her daughter-in-law KIM Kyong Hui to bank accounts outside the Union.
Datum rojstva: 18.8.1976
DOB: 18.8.1976
Kraj rojstva: Pjongjang, DLRK
POB: Pyongyang, DPRK
Diplomat DLRK na veleposlaništvu v Belorusiji
Diplomat, DPRK Embassy Belarus
Skupina strokovnjakov je ugotovila, da je KIM Suj Gwang agent urada Reconnaissance General Bureau, tj. subjekta, ki je na seznamu Združenih narodov.
KIM Su Gwang has been identified by the Panel of Experts as an agent of the Reconnaissance General Bureau, an entity which has been designated by the United Nations.
Ugotovila je tudi, da KIM Su Gwang in njegov oče KIM Yong Nam sodelujeta v vzorcu goljufivih finančnih praks, ki bi lahko prispeval k programom DLRK, povezanim z jedrskim orožjem, balističnimi izstrelki ali drugim orožjem za množično uničevanje.
He and his father KIM Yong Nam have been identified by the Panel of Experts as engaging in a pattern of deceptive financial practices which could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes.
KIM Su Gwang je odprl več bančnih računov v več državah članicah, tudi na imena družinskih članov.
KIM Su Gwang has opened multiple bank accounts in several Member States, including under family members' names.
Ko je delal kot diplomat, je sodeloval je pri različnih večjih bančnih transferjih na bančne račune v Uniji oziroma na račune zunaj Unije, tudi na račune, odprte na ime soproge KIM Kyong Hui.
He has been involved in various large bank transfers to bank accounts in the Union or to accounts outside the Union while working as a diplomat, including to accounts in the name of his spouse KIM Kyong Hui.
Datum rojstva: 6.5.1981
DOB: 6.5.1981
KIM Kyong Hui skupaj z možem KIMOM Sujem Gwangom, tastom KIMOM Yongom Namom in taščo DJANG Tcheul Hy sodeluje v vzorcu goljufivih finančnih praks, ki bi lahko prispevale k programom DLRK, povezanim z jedrskim orožjem, balističnimi izstrelki ali drugim orožjem za množično uničevanje.
KIM Kyong Hui has been involved together with her husband KIM Su Gwang, her father-in-law KIM Yong Nam and her mother-in-law DJANG Tcheul Hy in a pattern of deceptive financial practices which could contribute to the DPRK's nuclear-related, ballistic-missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes.
Prejela je več bančnih nakazil od moža KIMA Suja Gwanga in tasta KIMA Yonga Nama ter prenesla denar na račune zunaj Unije, odprte na njeno ime ali na ime tašče DJANG Tcheul Hy.“
Commission Decision (EU) 2018/612
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2018/612
of 7 April 2016
z dne 7. aprila 2016
on State aid SA.28876 - 2012/C (ex CP 202/2009) implemented by Greece for Container Terminal Port of Piraeus
o državni pomoči SA 28876 - 2012/C (ex CP 202/2009), ki jo je Grčija odobrila v zvezi s kontejnerskim terminalom pristanišča Pirej
(notified under document C(2018) 1978)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2018) 1978)
On 23 March 2015, the Commission adopted a final decision (‘final decision’) with which it concluded that Greece had unlawfully put into effect in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, incompatible aid measures in favour of Piraeus Container Terminal S.A (‘PCT’) and its mother company and creditor, Cosco Pacific Limited (‘Cosco’), and ordered the abolition and the recovery of the aid measures concerned.
Komisija je 23. marca 2015 sprejela končni sklep (v nadaljnjem besedilu: končni sklep), s katerim je ugotovila, da je Grčija v nasprotju s členom 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije nezakonito uvedla nezdružljive ukrepe pomoči v korist podjetja Piraeus Container Terminal S.A. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje PCT) in njegove matične družbe in upnice, podjetja Cosco Pacific Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje Cosco) ter odredila njihovo ukinitev in vračilo zadevnih pomoči.
On 2 June 2015, Greece appealed the final decision before the General Court of the European Union.
Grčija je 2. junija 2015 vložila pritožbo proti končnemu sklepu pred Splošnim sodiščem Evropske unije.
The final decision
Končni sklep
In 2009 the Commission received complaints concerning several fiscal measures granted by law 3755/2009 (‘the Law’) to the concession holder of a part of the Port of Piraeus, Cosco and its subsidiary PCT.
Komisija je leta 2009 prejela pritožbe v zvezi z več fiskalnimi ukrepi, ki so bili z Zakonom št. 3755/2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Zakon) dodeljeni koncesionarju dela pristanišča Pirej, podjetju Cosco in njegovemu hčerinskemu podjetju, podjetju PCT.
On 11 July 2012 the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure raising doubts concerning these tax exemptions (‘opening decision’).
oprostitev davka od dohodkov za obračunane in še ne plačane obresti do datuma začetka obratovanja pomola III,
On 23 March 2015, the Commission concluded the formal investigation of the case and considered that the following measures constituted unlawful and incompatible State aid:
pravica do vračila DDV iz dobropisa ne glede na fazo zaključenosti predmeta pogodbe; opredelitev pojma „investicijsko blago“ za namene pravil o DDV; pravica do zamudnih obresti od prvega dne po 60 dneh vložitve zahtevka za vračilo DDV,
Exemption from income tax on interest accrued until the date of commencement of operation of pier III;
prenos izgube brez časovne omejitve,
Right to VAT credit refund irrespective of the stage of completion of the contract object; definition of the notion of ‘investment good’ for the purposes of VAT rules; right to arrear interests from the first day following the 60th day after the VAT refund request;
izbira med tremi amortizacijskimi metodami v zvezi s stroški naložb za prenovo pomola II in gradnjo pomola III,
Loss carry forward without any temporal limitation;
oprostitev kolkovin na posojilne pogodbe in kateri koli pomožni sporazum o financiranju projekta,
Choice among three depreciation methods concerning the investment costs of the reconstruction of Pier II and the construction of Pier III;
oprostitev davkov, kolkovin in prispevkov ter vseh pravic v korist države ali tretjih strani v zvezi s pogodbami med upniki iz posojilnih pogodb, na podlagi katerih se prenesejo obveznosti in pravice, ki iz njih izhajajo,
Exemption from stamp duty on the loan agreements and any ancillary agreements for the funding of the project;
oprostitev kolkovin za vsako nadomestilo, ki ga podjetje Port Piraeus Authority (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje PPA) izplača podjetju PCT na podlagi koncesijske pogodbe, ki ne spada na področje Zakona o DDV,
Exemption from taxes, stamp duties, contributions and any rights in favour of the State or third parties on the contracts between the creditors of the loan agreements under which are transferred the obligations and rights resulting therefrom;
zaščita v okviru posebnega režima za tuje naložbe.
Exemption from stamp duties for any compensation paid by Port Piraeus Authority (‘PPA’) to PCT under the Concession contract, which is outside the scope of the VAT code;
V istem sklepu je Komisija sklenila, da Grčija ni dodelila državne pomoči z izvzetjem podjetja PCT od pravil o prisilni razlastitvi.
Protection under the special regime for foreign investments.
Ukrep, ki se ocenjuje: oprostitev kolkovin za vsako nadomestilo, ki ga podjetje PPA izplača podjetju PCT
In the same decision the Commission concluded that Greece did not grant State aid by exempting PCT from rules concerning forced expropriation.
Kar zadeva oprostitev kolkovine za nadomestila, ki jih podjetje PPA izplača podjetju PCT, je Komisija v končnem sklepu ugotovila, da pomeni selektivno prednost v korist podjetja PCT, ker ga je razbremenila plačevanja kolkovin za: (a) nadomestilo, ki ga plača podjetje PPA zaradi aktiviranja kazenske klavzule in (b) druge vrste nadomestil za škodo, povezano s koncesijsko pogodbo ali mednarodno kršitev pogodbe.
The measure under assessment: stamp duty exemption for compensations paid by PPA to PCT
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bila zlasti v primeru nadomestila, ki ga podjetje PPA izplača zaradi aktiviranja kazenske klavzule (tj. v skladu s točko (a) v predhodni uvodni izjavi), prednost, podeljena podjetju PCT, njegova razbremenitev plačila fiksne kolkovine v takih primerih.
Regarding the exemption from stamp duty for compensations paid by PPA to PCT, in the final decision, the Commission concluded that it entailed a selective advantage in favour of PCT in that it alleviated it from the payment of stamp duties in the case of: (a) compensation paid by PPA due to the activation of a penalty clause of the concession contract, and (b) other types of compensation paid by PPA, such as for damages related to the concession contract or for international breach of contract.
Ta sklep je temeljil na upoštevanju tega, da se v skladu s splošno veljavnim okvirom, tj. zakonom o kolkovinah, kot ga razlaga okrožnica št. 44/1987, za aktiviranje pomožnega sporazuma, povezanega s pogodbo, ki je predmet DDV, uporablja fiksna kolkovina.
Concerning in particular the case of compensation paid by PPA due to the activation of a penalty clause (i.e. under (a) in the immediately above recital) the Commission concluded that the advantage conferred to PCT consisted in its alleviation from the payment of a fixed stamp duty in such cases.
Vendar pa je Grčija v tožbi za razglasitev ničnosti končnega sklepa pred Splošnim sodiščem navedla, da so bile kolkovine na splošno odpravljene od leta 2001, torej preden je bila z Zakonom št. 3755/2009 uvedena zadevna izjema v korist podjetja PCT.
This conclusion was based on the consideration that according to the generally applicable framework, i.e. the stamp duty code as interpreted by circular 44/1987, the activation of an ancillary agreement related to a contract subject to VAT is subject to a fixed stamp duty.
OCENA UKREPA
However, in its application for annulment of the final decision before the General Court, Greece indicated that fixed stamp duties have been generally abolished since 2001, i.e. before law 3755/2009 introduced the relevant exemption in favour of PCT.
Grški organi med upravnim postopkom, ki je privedel do pravnomočnega sklepa, nikoli niso opozorili Komisije na dejstvo, da so bile fiksne kolkovine na podlagi člena 25 Zakona št. 2873/2000 odpravljene od leta 2001.
ASSESSMENT OF THE MEASURE
Grški organi nikoli niso omenili tega dejstva, čeprav je sklep o začetku postopka začel formalni postopek preiskave iz člena 108(2) PDEU v zvezi z izvzetjem podjetja PCT od kolkovin na splošno (vključno s fiksnimi in sorazmernimi kolkovinami), ki je bilo podjetju PCT zagotovljeno na podlagi člena 2(10) Zakona.
During the administrative procedure that led to the final decision, the Greek authorities never brought to the Commission's attention the fact that fixed stamp duties have been abolished since 2001, by virtue of Article 25 of law 2873/2000.
Komisija je zato na podlagi informacij, ki so ji bile na voljo ob sprejetju končnega sklepa, upravičeno sklenila, da je bila s členom 2(10) Zakona podjetju PCT dodeljena nezdružljiva državna pomoč z izvzetjem od tako fiksnih kot sorazmernih kolkovin za nadomestilo, ki ga podjetje PPA izplača podjetju PCT na podlagi koncesijske pogodbe.
The Greek authorities never mentioned this fact, although the opening decision had opened the formal investigation procedure of Article 108(2) TFEU with respect to the exemption of PCT from stamp duties in general (including fixed and proportional stamp duties), provided to PCT on the basis of Article 2(10) of the Law.
Čeprav so grški organi Komisijo pozno obvestili o splošni odpravi fiksne kolkovine, želi Komisija v duhu dobrega javnega upravljanja kljub temu, da ni zavezana spremeniti končnega sklepa, spremeniti zadevni končni sklep, tako da bo v celoti odražal trenutno stanje.
Therefore, on the basis of the information available to the Commission when the final decision was adopted, the Commission was entitled to conclude that Article 2(10) of the Law granted incompatible State aid to PCT by exempting it from both fixed and proportional stamp duties on compensation paid by PPA to PCT under the concession contract.
Natančneje, glede člena 25 Zakona št. 2873/2000 Komisija nima več nobenega razloga za sklepanje, da izjema iz člena 2(10) Zakona daje selektivno prednost podjetju PCT v primeru, ko podjetje PPA izplača podjetju PCT nadomestilo zaradi aktiviranja kazenske klavzule iz koncesijske pogodbe.
Even if the Greek authorities belatedly informed the Commission on the general abolishment of fixed stamp duties, the Commission, acting as a sound administration and although not obliged to modify the final decision, wishes however to modify that final decision, in order to fully reflect the present situation.
V skladu s splošno veljavnimi pravili za to vrsto plačil nadomestil v času sprejetja Zakona št. 3755/2009 ni veljalo plačilo kolkovine.
Specifically, in view of Article 25 of law 2873/2000, the Commission has no longer any reason to consider that the exemption of Article 2(10) of the Law confers an advantage to PCT in case PPA pays compensations to PCT due to the activation of a penalty clause of the concession contract.
Zato zadevno izvzetje od plačila kolkovine ne daje selektivne prednosti podjetju PCT in tako s tem v zvezi ne pomeni državne pomoči.
According to the generally applicable rules for this type of compensation payment, no stamp duty was due at the time law 3755/2009 was adopted.
Ker je bila Komisija s to informacijo seznanjena šele po sprejetju končnega sklepa v tej zadevi, je v duhu dobrega javnega upravljanja sklenila spremeniti svoj sklep z dne 23. marca 2015 glede te posebne prednosti ukrepa.
Therefore, the relevant stamp duty exemption does not confer a selective advantage to PCT and, thus, does not constitute State aid, in this respect.
Končni sklep se v ničemer ne spremeni glede izvzetja podjetja PCT od plačila (sorazmerne) kolkovine, ki običajno velja za druge vrste nadomestil, ki jih izplača podjetje PPA (tj. v skladu s točko (b) uvodne izjave 5 tega sklepa).