natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
where the notice of appeal has not been filed within two months of the date of notification of the decision subject to appeal;
se obvestilo o pritožbi ni vložilo v roku dveh mesecev po vročitvi odločbe, ki je predmet pritožbe;
where the appeal does not comply with Articles 66 and 67 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, or with those laid down in Article 21(1)(d) and Article 21(2) and (3) of this Regulation, unless those deficiencies are remedied within four months of the date of notification of the decision subject to appeal;
pritožba ni v skladu s členoma 66 in 67 Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ali s členom 21(1)(d) ter 21(2) in (3) te uredbe, razen če se te pomanjkljivosti odpravijo v roku štirih mesecev po vročitvi odločbe, ki je predmet pritožbe;
where the notice of appeal does not comply with the requirements laid down in Article 21(1)(a), (b), (c) and (e), and the appellant has, despite having been informed thereof by the Board of Appeal, not remedied those deficiencies within the time limit specified by the Board of Appeal to that effect;
obvestilo o pritožbi ni v skladu z določbami člena 21(1)(a), (b), (c) in (e) in pritožnik ni odpravil teh pomanjkljivosti, čeprav ga je o njih obvestil odbor za pritožbe, v roku, ki ga je za to določil odbor za pritožbe;
where the statement of grounds has not been filed within four months of the date of notification of the decision subject to appeal;
se izjava z razlogi ni vložila v roku štirih mesecev po vročitvi odločbe, ki je predmet pritožbe;
where the statement of grounds does not comply with the requirements laid down in Article 22(1)(a) and (b), and the appellant has, despite having been informed thereof by the Board of Appeal, not remedied those deficiencies within the time limit specified by the Board of Appeal to that effect or has not submitted the translation of the statement of grounds within one month of the date of the submission of the original statement in accordance with Article 22(2).
izjava z razlogi ni v skladu z določbami člena 22(1)(a) in (b) ter pritožnik ni odpravil teh pomanjkljivosti, čeprav ga je o njih obvestil odbor za pritožbe, v roku, ki ga je za to določil odbor za pritožbe, oziroma v roku enega meseca po predložitvi izvirnika, ali ni predložil prevoda izjave z vzroki v mesecu dni od vložitve izvirnika v skladu s členom 22(2).
Where the appeal appears to be inadmissible, the chairperson of the Board of Appeal to which the case has been allocated pursuant to Article 35(1) may request the Board of Appeal to decide without delay on the admissibility of the appeal prior to the notification to the defendant of the notice or of the statement of grounds, as the case may be.
Če je pritožba očitno nedopustna, lahko predsedujoči odboru za pritožbe, ki v skladu s členom 35(1) obravnava primer, od odbora zahteva, da nemudoma sprejme odločitev o dopustnosti pritožbe, preden se obvestilo ali izjava z razlogi vroči toženi stranki.
The Board of Appeal shall declare an appeal as deemed not to have been filed where the appeal fee has been paid after the expiry of the time limit set out in the first sentence of Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Odbor za pritožbe razglasi, da se šteje, da pritožba ni bila vložena, če se pristojbina za pritožbo plača po izteku roka, določenega v prvem stavku člena 68(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001.
In such a case, paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply.
V tem primeru se uporablja odstavek 2 tega člena.
In inter partes proceedings, the defendant may file a response within two months of the date of notification of the appellant's statement of grounds.
Tožena stranka lahko v postopku inter partes vloži odgovor v roku dveh mesecev po vročitvi pritožnikove izjave z razlogi.
In exceptional circumstances, that time limit may be extended upon reasoned request by the defendant.
V izjemnih okoliščinah se lahko na podlagi utemeljene zahteve tožene stranke ta rok podaljša.
The response shall contain the name and address of the defendant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626 and shall comply, mutatis mutandis, with the conditions laid down in Article 21(1)(b), (c) and (d), Article 22(1)(a) and (c) and Article 22(2) of this Regulation.
Odgovor vsebuje ime in naslov tožene stranke v skladu s členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626 in smiselno izpolnjuje določbe iz členov 21(1)(b), (c) in (d), 22(1)(a) in (c) ter 22(2) te uredbe.
Cross appeal
Nasprotna pritožba
Where the defendant seeks a decision annulling or altering the contested decision on a point not raised in the appeal, pursuant to Article 68(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, that cross appeal shall be filed within the time limit for filing a response in accordance with Article 24(1) of this Regulation.
Če tožena stranka na podlagi člena 68(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 zahteva, da se sprejme odločitev o razveljavitvi ali spremembi izpodbijane odločbe v zvezi s točko, ki v pritožbi ni izpostavljena, se ta nasprotna pritožba vloži v roku za vložitev odgovora na pritožbo v skladu s členom 24(1) te uredbe.
A cross appeal shall be submitted by a document separate from the response.
Nasprotna pritožba se vloži z ločeno vlogo, ki ni odgovor na pritožnikovo izjavo.
The cross appeal shall contain the name and address of the defendant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626 and shall comply mutatis mutandis with the conditions laid down in Article 21(1)(b) to (e) and Article 22 of this Regulation.
Nasprotna pritožba vsebuje ime in naslov tožene stranke v skladu s členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626 in smiselno izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 21(1)(b) do (e) in člena 22 te uredbe.
A cross appeal shall be rejected as inadmissible in any of the following events:
Nasprotna pritožba se zavrže kot nedopustna, če:
where it has not been filed within the time limit laid down in paragraph 1;
se ni vložila v roku, določenem v odstavku 1;
where it has not been filed in observance of the requirements laid down either in paragraph 2 or Article 21(1)(d);
se ni vložila v skladu z določbami bodisi odstavka 2 ali člena 21(1)(d);
where it does not comply with the requirements referred to in paragraph 3, and the defendant has, despite having been informed thereof by the Board of Appeal, not remedied these deficiencies within the time limit specified by the Board of Appeal to that effect or has not submitted the translation of the cross appeal and the corresponding statement of grounds within one month of the date of submission of the original.
ni v skladu z določbami iz odstavka 3 in tožena stranka ni odpravila teh pomanjkljivosti, čeprav jo je o njih obvestil odbor za pritožbe, v roku, ki ga je za to določil odbor za pritožbe, oziroma ni predložila prevoda nasprotne pritožbe ter ustrezne izjave z razlogi za pritožbo v roku enega meseca od datuma vložitve izvirnika.
The appellant shall be invited to submit observations on the defendant's cross appeal within two months of the date of notification to the appellant.
Pritožnika se pozove, da v roku dveh mesecev po vročitvi nasprotne pritožbe tožene stranke v zvezi z njo predloži pripombe.
In exceptional circumstances, that time limit may be extended by the Board of Appeal upon the reasoned request of the appellant.
Odbor za pritožbe lahko v izjemnih okoliščinah na podlagi utemeljene zahteve pritožnika ta rok podaljša.
Article 26 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Člen 26 se uporablja smiselno.
Reply and rejoinder in inter partes proceedings
Replika in duplika v postopku inter partes
Upon the appellant's reasoned request filed within two weeks of the notification of the response, the Board of Appeal may, pursuant to Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, authorise the appellant to supplement the statement of grounds with a reply within a period specified by the Board of Appeal.
Na podlagi pritožnikove utemeljene zahteve, vložene v roku dveh tednov po vročitvi odgovora, lahko odbor za pritožbe v skladu s členom 70(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 pritožniku dovoli, da v roku, ki ga določi odbor za pritožbe, z repliko dopolni izjavo z razlogi.
In such a case, the Board of Appeal shall also authorise the defendant to supplement the response with a rejoinder within a period specified by the Board of Appeal.
V tem primeru odbor za pritožbe dovoli tudi toženi stranki, da v roku, ki ga določi odbor za pritožbe, z dupliko dopolni odgovor.
Examination of the appeal
Preizkus pritožbe
In ex parte proceedings, and with respect to those goods or services which form part of the subject matter of the appeal, the Board of Appeal, in compliance with Article 45(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, shall proceed in accordance with Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 where it raises a ground for refusal of the trade mark application which had not already been invoked in the decision subject to appeal in application of that provision.
V postopkih ex parte in v zvezi s tistim blagom ali storitvami, ki so del predmeta pritožbe, odbor za pritožbe na podlagi člena 45(3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ravna v skladu s členom 42 Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 v primeru, da izpostavi vzrok za zavrnitev prijave blagovne znamke, ki ob uporabi navedene določbe ni bil naveden v odločbi, ki je predmet pritožbe.
In inter partes proceedings, the examination of the appeal and, as the case may be, the cross appeal, shall be restricted to the grounds invoked in the statement of grounds and, as the case may be, in the cross appeal.
V postopku inter partes je preizkus pritožbe oziroma nasprotne pritožbe omejen na razloge, navedene v izjavi z razlogi oziroma v nasprotni pritožbi.
Matters of law not raised by the parties shall be examined by the Board of Appeal only where they concern essential procedural requirements or where it is necessary to resolve them in order to ensure a correct application of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 having regard to the facts, evidence and arguments presented by the parties.
Odbor za pritožbe preizkusi pravna vprašanja, ki jih stranke ne izpostavijo, le toliko, kolikor zadevajo bistvene procesne zahteve ali kjer jih je treba razrešiti, da se zagotovi pravilna uporaba Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ob upoštevanju dejstev, dokazil in navedb, ki so jih predstavile stranke.
The examination of the appeal shall include the following claims or requests provided that they have been raised in the statement of grounds of the appeal or, as the case may be, in the cross appeal and provided that they were raised in due time in the proceedings before the instance of the Office which adopted the decision subject to appeal:
Preizkus pritožbe zajema naslednje trditve in zahteve, pod pogojem, da so bili izpostavljeni pravočasno v izjavi z razlogi v pritožbi oziroma v nasprotni pritožbi in pod pogojem, da so bili izpostavljeni pravočasno med postopkom pred organom Urada, ki je izdal odločbo, ki je predmet pritožbe:
distinctiveness acquired through use as referred to in Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001;
razlikovalni učinek, pridobljen z uporabo, kot je določeno v členih 7(3) in 59(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001;
recognition of the earlier trade mark on the market acquired through use for the purposes of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001;
prepoznavnost prejšnje blagovne znamke na trgu, ki je bila pridobljena z uporabo za namene člena 8(1)(b) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001;
proof of use pursuant to Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 or Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
dokaz o uporabi na podlagi člena 47(2) in (3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ali člena 64(2) in (3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001.
In accordance with Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Board of Appeal may accept facts or evidence submitted for the first time before it only where those facts or evidence meet the following requirements:
Odbor za pritožbe lahko v skladu s členom 95(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 sprejme dejstva in dokazila, ki so mu predložena prvič, le če ta dejstva in dokazila izpolnjujejo naslednje zahteve:
they are, on the face of it, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case; and
zdijo se pomembna za izid zadeve ter
they have not been produced in due time for valid reasons, in particular where they are merely supplementing relevant facts and evidence which had already been submitted in due time, or are filed to contest findings made or examined by the first instance of its own motion in the decision subject to appeal.
niso bila predložena pravočasno zaradi tehtnih razlogov, zlasti če zgolj dopolnjujejo zadevna dejstva in dokazila, ki so bila predložena pravočasno, oziroma so vložena za namene izpodbijanja sklepov ali preizkusov, ki jih je pri odločbi, ki je predmet pritožbe, na lastno pobudo opravila prva stopnja.
The Board of Appeal shall, at the latest in its decision on the appeal and, as the case may be, the cross appeal, decide on requests for restriction, division or partial surrender of the contested mark declared during the appeal proceedings by the applicant or the proprietor in accordance with Articles 49, 50 or 57 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Odbor za pritožbe najpozneje pri odločitvi o pritožbi oziroma nasprotni pritožbi presodi o zahtevah za omejitev, delitev ali delno odpoved izpodbijane znamke, ki jih med pritožbenim postopkom izjavi pritožnik ali imetnik v skladu s členom 49, 50 ali 57 Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001.
Where the Board of Appeal accepts the restriction, division or partial surrender, it shall without delay inform the department in charge of the Register and the departments dealing with parallel proceedings involving the same mark accordingly.
Če odbor za pritožbe sprejme omejitev, delitev ali delno odpoved, o tem nemudoma obvesti oddelek, ki upravlja register, ter oddelke, ki obravnavajo vzporedne postopke v zvezi z isto znamko.
Communications by the Board of Appeal
Sporočila odbora za pritožbe
Communications by the Board of Appeal in the course of the examination of the appeal or with a view to facilitating an amicable settlement of proceedings shall be prepared by the rapporteur and shall be signed by the rapporteur on behalf of the Board of Appeal, in agreement with the chairperson of the Board of Appeal.
Sporočila odbora za pritožbe med preizkusom pritožbe oziroma za namene omogočanja mirne rešitve postopka odbora za pritožbe s soglasjem predsedujočega odboru za pritožbe pripravlja in podpiše poročevalec v imenu odbora.
Where a Board of Appeal communicates with the parties regarding its provisional opinion on matters of fact or law, it shall state that it is not bound by such a communication.
Če odbor za pritožbe strankam pošilja sporočila v zvezi s svojim predhodnim mnenjem o dejstvih ali pravnih vprašanjih, navede, da ga ta sporočila ne zavezujejo.
Comments on questions of general interest
Pripombe k vprašanjem splošnega interesa
The Board of Appeal may, on its own initiative or upon the written, reasoned request of the Executive Director of the Office, invite the Executive Director to comment on questions of general interest which arise in the course of proceedings pending before it.
Odbor za pritožbe lahko na lastno pobudo ali na podlagi utemeljene pisne zahteve izvršnega direktorja Urada tega izvršnega direktorja pozove, naj poda pripombe k vprašanjem splošnega interesa, ki se pojavijo v tekočem postopku pred Uradom.
The parties shall be entitled to submit their observations on the Executive Director's comments.
Stranke imajo glede pripomb izvršnega direktorja pravico podati svoje pripombe.
Reopening of the examination of absolute grounds
Ponovni preizkus absolutnih razlogov
Where, in ex parte proceedings, the Board of Appeal considers that an absolute ground for refusal may be applicable to goods or services listed in the trade mark application which do not form part of the subject matter of the appeal, it shall inform the examiner competent for examining that application who may decide to reopen the examination pursuant to Article 45(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 with respect to those goods or services.
Če v postopku ex parte odbor za pritožbe meni, da bi lahko absolutni razlog za zavrnitev veljal tudi za blago ali storitve, navedene v prijavi blagovne znamke, ki niso del predmeta pritožbe, obvesti preizkuševalca, pristojnega za preizkus te prijave, ki se lahko v skladu s členom 45(3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 odloči ponovno preizkusiti prijavo v zvezi z zadevnim blagom ali storitvami.
Where a decision of the Opposition Division is subject to an appeal, the Board of Appeal may, by means of a reasoned interim decision and without prejudice to Article 66(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, suspend the appeal proceedings and remit the contested application to the examiner competent for examining that application with a recommendation to reopen the examination pursuant to Article 45(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, where it considers that an absolute ground for refusal shall apply to some or all of the goods or services listed in the trade mark application.
Če je predmet pritožbe odločba oddelka za ugovor, lahko odbor za pritožbe z utemeljeno vmesno odločbo in brez poseganja v člen 66(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 prekine pritožbeni postopek in vrne izpodbijano prijavo preizkuševalcu, pristojnemu za preizkus navedene prijave, skupaj s priporočilom, da se preizkus v skladu s členom 45(3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ponovno opravi, če meni, da absolutni razlog za zavrnitev velja za nekatero ali vse blago ali storitve, navedene v prijavi blagovne znamke.
Where the contested application has been remitted in application of paragraph 2, the examiner shall inform the Board of Appeal without delay whether or not the examination of the contested application has been reopened.
Če se izpodbijana prijava na podlagi odstavka 2 vrne, preizkuševalec nemudoma obvesti odbor za pritožbe, ali se je preizkus izpodbijane prijave ponovno opravil ali ne.
Where the examination has been reopened, the appeal proceedings shall remain suspended until the examiner's decision has been taken and, where the contested application is rejected in whole or in part, until the examiner's decision to this effect has become final.
Če se preizkus ponovno opravi, ostane pritožbeni postopek prekinjen, dokler preizkuševalec ne sprejme odločitve oziroma, v primeru, da se izpodbijana prijava v celoti ali v določenem delu zavrže, dokler preizkuševalčeva odločitev o tem ne postane dokončna.
Examination of an appeal as a matter of priority
Preizkus pritožbe kot prednostna naloga
Upon reasoned request of the appellant or of the defendant and after hearing the other party, the Board of Appeal may decide, having regard to the particular urgency and the circumstances of the case, to examine the appeal as a matter of priority, without prejudice to the provisions in Articles 23 and 26, including the provisions on time limits.
Na podlagi utemeljene zahteve pritožnika ali tožene stranke in po zaslišanju druge stranke, se odbor za pritožbe lahko ob upoštevanju posebne nujnosti in okoliščin primera brez poseganja v določbe členov 23 in 26, vključno z določbami o rokih, odloči, da je preizkus pritožbe prednostna naloga.
The request for the examination of the appeal as a matter of priority may be filed at any time in the course of the appeal proceedings.
Zahteva za prednost preizkusa pritožbe se vloži v ločeni vlogi in jo je mogoče vložiti kadar koli med pritožbenim postopkom.
It shall be filed in a separate document and shall be supported by evidence as to the urgency and the particular circumstances of the case.
Vloži se v ločeni vlogi in je podprta z dokazili o nujnosti in posebnih okoliščinah primera.
Formal content of the Board of Appeal's decision
Formalna vsebina odločbe odbora za pritožbe
The Board of Appeal's decision shall contain:
Odločba odbora za pritožbe vsebuje:
a statement that it is delivered by the Boards of Appeal;
navedbo, da jo je podal odbor za pritožbe;
the names of the parties and of their representatives;
imena strank in njihovih zastopnikov;
the number of the appeal to which it refers and an identification of the decision subject to appeal in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 21(1)(d);
številko pritožbe, na katero se nanaša, in opredelitev odločbe, ki je bila predmet pritožbe, v skladu z določbami iz člena 21(1)(d);
an indication as to the formation of the Board of Appeal;
navedbo sestave odbora za pritožbe;
the name and, without prejudice to Article 39(5), the signature of the chairperson and members who took part in the decision, including an indication of who acted as rapporteur in the case, or, where the decision is delivered by a single member, the name and signature of the member who took the decision;
ime in, brez poseganja v člen 39(5), podpis predsedujočega in članov, ki so pri odločbi sodelovali, vključno z navedbo osebe, ki je pri primeru opravljala naloge poročevalca, oziroma v primeru, da je odločbo sprejel en sam član, ime in podpis tega člana;
the name and the signature of the Registrar or, as the case may be, of the member of the Registry signing on the Registrar's behalf;
ime in podpis tajnika oziroma člana tajništva, ki se podpiše v imenu tajnika;
a summary of the facts and of the arguments submitted by the parties;
povzetek dejstev in navedb, ki so jih predložile stranke;
a statement of the reasons for which the decision has been taken;
izjava o razlogih, na katerih odločba temelji;
the order of the Board of Appeal, including, where necessary, a decision on costs.
odredba odbora za pritožbe, vključno s sklepom o stroških, če je to potrebno.
Reimbursement of the appeal fee
Povračilo pristojbin za pritožbe
The appeal fee shall be reimbursed by order of the Board of Appeal in either of the following events:
Pristojbina za pritožbo se povrne po odredbi odbora za pritožbe, če:
where the appeal is not deemed to have been filed in accordance with the second sentence of Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001;
se v skladu z drugim stavkom člena 68(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ne šteje, da je pritožba bila vložena;
where the decision-making instance of the Office which adopted the contested decision grants revision pursuant to Article 69(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 or revokes the contested decision in application of Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001;
organ Urada, ki je izdal izpodbijano odločbo, v skladu s členom 69(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 odobri revizijo ali na podlagi člena 103 Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 razveljavi izpodbijano odločbo;
where, following reopening of the examination proceedings within the meaning of Article 45(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 upon the Board of Appeal's recommendation pursuant to Article 30(2) of this Regulation, the contested application has been rejected by final decision of the examiner and the appeal has become devoid of purpose as a consequence thereof;
se izpodbijana prijava po ponovnem preizkusu v smislu člena 45(3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 na podlagi priporočila odbora za pritožbe v skladu s členom 30(2) te uredbe z dokončno odločbo preizkuševalca zavrže, zaradi česar postane pritožba brezpredmetna;
where the Board of Appeal considers such reimbursement equitable by reason of a substantial procedural violation.
odbor za pritožbe meni, da je tovrstno povračilo pravično zaradi bistvenih kršitev postopka.
Revision and revocation of the decision subject to appeal
Revizija in razveljavitev odločbe, ki je predmet pritožbe
Where, in ex parte proceedings, the appeal is not rejected pursuant to Article 23(1), the Board of Appeal shall submit the notice of appeal and the statement of grounds of appeal to the instance of the Office which adopted the contested decision for the purposes of Article 69 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Če se v postopku ex parte pritožba v skladu s členom 23(1) ne zavrže, odbor za pritožbe za namene člena 69 Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 predloži obvestilo o pritožbi in izjavo z razlogi za pritožbo organu Urada, ki je izdal izpodbijano odločbo.
Where the instance of the Office which adopted the decision subject to appeal decides to grant revision pursuant to Article 69(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, it shall inform the Board of Appeal thereof without delay.
Če se organ Urada, ki je izdal odločbo, ki je predmet pritožbe, odloči, da v skladu s členom 69(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 odobri revizijo, o tem nemudoma obvesti odbor za pritožbe.