natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The list of goods for whose export an authorisation is required with a view to preventing these goods from being used for capital punishment should only include goods that have been used for capital punishment in a third country that has not abolished capital punishment and goods whose use for capital punishment any such third country has approved, without having used them for that purpose yet.
Seznam blaga, za katero je potrebno dovoljenje za izvoz, da bi se preprečila njegova uporaba za izvršitev smrtne kazni, bi moral vključevati le blago, ki je bilo uporabljeno za izvršitev smrtne kazni v tretji državi, ki ni odpravila smrtne kazni, in blago, za katero je katera koli taka tretja država odobrila uporabo za izvršitev smrtne kazni, a tega blaga za ta namen še ni uporabila.
It should not include non-lethal goods which are not essential for executing a convicted person, such as standard furniture that may also be found in the execution chamber.
Seznam ne bi smel vključevati blaga, ki ni smrtonosno in ni nepogrešljivo za usmrtitev obsojene osebe, kot so denimo običajni kosi pohištva, ki jih je tudi mogoče najti v celicah za izvršitev smrtne kazni.
Given the differences between capital punishment, on the one hand, and torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on the other, it is appropriate to lay down a specific export authorisation system with a view to preventing the use of certain goods for capital punishment.
Glede na razlike med smrtno kaznijo na eni strani ter mučenjem in drugim krutim, nečloveškim ali poniževalnim ravnanjem ali kaznovanjem na drugi je primerno vzpostaviti poseben sistem izvoznih dovoljenj, da se prepreči uporaba določenega blaga za izvršitev smrtne kazni.
Such a system should take into account the fact that a number of countries have abolished capital punishment for all crimes and have made an international commitment on this issue.
Takšen sistem bi moral upoštevati dejstvo, da so številne države odpravile smrtno kazen za vsa kazniva dejanja in sprejele mednarodno zavezo glede tega vprašanja.
As there is a risk of re-export to countries that have not done so, certain conditions and requirements should be imposed when authorising exports to countries that have abolished capital punishment.
Ker obstaja tveganje ponovnega izvoza v države, ki tega niso storile, bi bilo treba uvesti določene pogoje in zahteve za izdajo dovoljenj za izvoz v države, ki so odpravile smrtno kazen.
It is therefore appropriate to grant a general export authorisation for exports to those countries that have abolished capital punishment for all crimes and confirmed that abolition through an international commitment.
Zato je primerno, da se splošno izvozno dovoljenje izda za izvoz v države, ki so odpravile smrtno kazen za vsa kazniva dejanja in to odpravo potrdile z mednarodno zavezo.
If a country has not abolished capital punishment for all crimes and confirmed that abolition through an international commitment, the competent authorities should, when examining a request for an export authorisation, check whether there is a risk that the end-user in the country of destination would use the exported goods for such punishment.
Če država ni odpravila smrtne kazni za vsa kazniva dejanja in te odprave potrdila z mednarodno zavezo, bi morali pristojni organi pri proučevanju vloge za izvozno dovoljenje preveriti, ali obstaja tveganje, da bi končni uporabnik v namembni državi uporabil izvoženo blago za izvršitev takšne kazni.
Appropriate conditions and requirements should be imposed to control sales or transfers to third parties by the end-user.
Uvesti bi bilo treba ustrezne pogoje in zahteve za nadzor prodaje ali prenosa tretjim osebam s strani končnega uporabnika.
If multiple shipments between the same exporter and end-user take place, the competent authorities should be allowed to review the status of the end-user on a periodic basis, for example every six months, rather than every time an export authorisation for a shipment is granted, without prejudice to the right of the competent authorities to annul, suspend, modify or revoke an export authorisation where warranted.
Če je več pošiljk med istim izvoznikom in končnim uporabnikom, bi moralo biti pristojnim organom dovoljeno, da status končnega uporabnika redno pregledujejo, na primer vsakih šest mesecev, namesto ob vsaki izdaji izvoznega dovoljenja za pošiljko, ne da bi to posegalo v pravico pristojnih organov, da razveljavijo, odložijo uporabo, spremenijo ali prekličejo izvozno dovoljenje, kadar je to utemeljeno.
In order to limit the administrative burden for exporters, the competent authorities should be allowed to grant an exporter a global authorisation for all shipments of medicinal products from the exporter to a specific end-user for a fixed period of time, specifying, where necessary, a quantity corresponding to the end-user's normal use of such products.
Da se omeji upravna obremenitev izvoznikov, bi moralo biti pristojnim organom dovoljeno, da izvozniku izdajo globalno dovoljenje za vse pošiljke zdravil od izvoznika do določenega končnega uporabnika za določeno obdobje, pri čemer se, kadar je potrebno, navede količina, ki ustreza običajni uporabi takih zdravil pri končnem uporabniku.
Such authorisation should be valid for between one and three years with a possible extension of up to two years.
Takšno dovoljenje bi moralo biti veljavno od enega leta do treh let in bi ga bilo možno podaljšati še za največ dve leti.
Granting a global authorisation would also be appropriate where a manufacturer intends to export medicinal products falling within the scope of this Regulation to a distributor in a country that has not abolished capital punishment, provided that the exporter and the distributor have concluded a legally binding agreement requiring the distributor to apply an appropriate set of measures ensuring that the medicinal products will not be used for capital punishment.
Izdaja globalnega dovoljenja bi bila ustrezna tudi v primeru, kadar namerava proizvajalec izvažati zdravila, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te uredbe, distributerju v državi, ki ni odpravila smrtne kazni, pod pogojem, da sta izvoznik in distributer sklenila pravno zavezujoč dogovor, v skladu s katerim mora distributer sprejeti ustrezen sklop ukrepov, ki zagotavlja, da se zdravila ne bodo uporabila za izvršitev smrtne kazni.
Since such controls are not applied to prevent the relevant medicinal products from being used for capital punishment but to prevent illicit drug trafficking, the export controls of this Regulation should be applied in addition to those international controls.
Nadzor izvoza v skladu s to uredbo se ne bi smel uporabljati za blago, katerega izvoz se nadzira v skladu s Skupnim stališčem 2008/944/SZVP, Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 428/2009 in Uredbo (EU) št. 258/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Member States should, however, be encouraged to use a single procedure in order to apply both control systems.
Za opravljanje posredniških storitev in zagotavljanje tehnične pomoči v zvezi z blagom s seznamov v Prilogi III ali Prilogi IV k tej uredbi bi moralo biti potrebno pridobiti predhodno dovoljenje, da bi se preprečilo, da posredniške storitve oziroma tehnična pomoč prispevajo k uporabi blaga, na katerega se nanašajo, za namene izvršitve smrtne kazni ali drugega krutega, nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja.
The controls on exports in accordance with this Regulation should not apply to goods whose export is controlled in accordance with Common Position 2008/944/CFSP, Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 and Regulation (EU) No 258/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Posredniške storitve in tehnična pomoč, za katere ta uredba predpisuje obveznost predhodnega dovoljenja, bi morale biti storitve in pomoč, ki se opravljajo oziroma zagotavljajo iz Unije, to je z ozemelj, za katere veljata Pogodbi, vključno z zračnim prostorom ter vsemi zrakoplovi ali plovili, ki so v pristojnosti katere od držav članic.
The supply of brokering services and the supply of technical assistance in respect of the goods listed in Annex III or in Annex IV to this Regulation should be subject to prior authorisation in order to prevent the brokering services or the technical assistance from contributing to the use of the goods to which they relate for the purpose of capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Pristojni organi bi si morali pri izdaji dovoljenja za zagotavljanje tehnične pomoči, povezane z blagom s seznama v Prilogi III k tej uredbi, prizadevati zagotoviti, da se tehnična pomoč in vsako usposabljanje za uporabo tega blaga, ki bi se opravilo ali ponudilo skupaj s tehnično pomočjo, za katero je potrebno dovoljenje, zagotovijo na tak način, da spodbujajo standarde kazenskega pregona, ki spoštujejo človekove pravice, in prispevajo k preprečevanju mučenja in drugega krutega, nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja.
The brokering services and technical assistance which this Regulation subjects to prior authorisation should be those that are supplied from within the Union, that is from within territories within the territorial scope of the Treaties, including airspace and any aircraft or any vessel under the jurisdiction of a Member State.
Da bi se gospodarskim subjektom preprečilo ustvarjanje dobička s prevozom blaga, ki prečka carinsko območje Unije na poti v tretjo državo in je namenjeno uporabi za izvršitev smrtne kazni, mučenje ali drugo kruto, nečloveško ali poniževalno ravnanje ali kaznovanje, je treba znotraj Unije prepovedati prevoz takšnega blaga, če je navedeno na seznamu v Prilogi III ali Prilogi IV k tej uredbi, če je gospodarski subjekt seznanjen s predvideno uporabo.
When authorising the supply of technical assistance related to goods listed in Annex III to this Regulation, the competent authorities should endeavour to ensure that the technical assistance and any training on the use of such goods that would be supplied or offered in conjunction with the technical assistance for which the authorisation is requested are provided in such a way that they promote law enforcement standards that respect human rights and contribute to the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Smernice za politiko EU do tretjih držav glede mučenja in drugega krutega, nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja med drugim določajo, da vodje misij v tretjih državah v svoja redna poročila vključijo tudi analizo primerov mučenja in drugega krutega, nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja v državi, kjer so akreditirani, pa tudi analizo ukrepov, sprejetih za boj proti tem pojavom.
In order to prevent economic operators from deriving benefits from transporting goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and which pass through the customs territory of the Union on their way to a third country, it is necessary to prohibit transport within the Union of such goods, if they are listed in Annex III or Annex IV to this Regulation, provided the economic operator has knowledge of the intended use.
Primerno je, da pristojni organi ob odločanju o vlogah za dovoljenje upoštevajo ta in podobna poročila ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij ter organizacij civilne družbe.
The Guidelines to EU Policy towards third countries on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment provide, inter alia, that the Heads of Mission in third countries will include in their periodic reports an analysis of the occurrence of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the State of their accreditation, and the measures taken to combat it.
Ta poročila bi morala vključevati tudi opis opreme, ki se v tretjih državah uporablja za izvršitev smrtne kazni ali za mučenje in drugo kruto, nečloveško ali poniževalno ravnanje ali kaznovanje.
It is appropriate for the competent authorities to take those and similar reports made by relevant international and civil society organisations into account when deciding on requests for authorisations.
Carinski organi bi morali z uporabo carinskega sistema za obvladovanje tveganja izmenjevati nekatere informacije z drugimi carinskimi organi v skladu s carinsko zakonodajo Unije, pristojni organi iz te uredbe pa bi morali izmenjevati nekatere informacije z drugimi pristojnimi organi.
Such reports should also describe any equipment used in third countries for the purpose of capital punishment or for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Primerno je zahtevati, da pristojni organi uporabljajo varen in šifriran sistem za izmenjavo informacij o zavrnitvah.
While customs authorities should share certain information with other customs authorities using the customs risk management system in accordance with Union customs legislation, the competent authorities referred to in this Regulation should share certain information with other competent authorities.
Za ta namen bi morala Komisija v obstoječem sistemu zagotoviti novo funkcijo v skladu s členom 19(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2009.
It is appropriate to require that the competent authorities use a secure and encrypted system for the exchange of information on denials.
Pri obdelavi in izmenjavi informacij v delu, ki zadeva osebne podatke, bi bilo treba izpolnjevati veljavna pravila za obdelavo in izmenjavo osebnih podatkov v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/679 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter Uredbo (EU) 2018/1725 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
To that end, the Commission should make available a new functionality in the existing system set up pursuant to Article 19(4) of Regulation (EC) No 428/2009.
Za sprejetje določb, potrebnih za uporabo te uredbe, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejme akte v zvezi s spremembami prilog I do IX k tej uredbi.
To the extent that it concerns personal data, processing and the exchange of information should comply with the applicable rules on processing and the exchange of personal data in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Zlasti je pomembno, da se Komisija pri svojem pripravljalnem delu ustrezno posvetuje, vključno na ravni strokovnjakov, in da se ta posvetovanja izvedejo v skladu z načeli, določenimi v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 13. aprila 2016 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje.
In order to adopt the provisions necessary for the application of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to Annexes I to IX to this Regulation.
Za zagotovitev enakopravnega sodelovanja pri pripravi delegiranih aktov Evropski parlament in Svet zlasti prejmeta vse dokumente sočasno s strokovnjaki iz držav članic, njuni strokovnjaki pa se sistematično lahko udeležujejo sestankov strokovnih skupin Komisije, ki zadevajo pripravo delegiranih aktov.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making.
Da bi se Uniji omogočilo hitro odzivanje v primerih razvoja novega blaga, ki bi se lahko uporabilo za izvršitev smrtne kazni, mučenje ali drugo kruto, nečloveško ali poniževalno ravnanje ali kaznovanje, in kadar obstaja očitno in neposredno tveganje, da bo to blago uporabljeno za namene, ki predstavljajo takšne hude kršitve človekovih pravic, je primerno zagotoviti takojšnje izvajanje zadevnega akta Komisije, kadar v primeru spremembe Priloge II ali III k tej uredbi obstajajo nujni razlogi za takšno spremembo.
In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Da bi se Uniji omogočilo hitro odzivanje v primerih, ko ena ali več tretjih držav bodisi odobri uporabo določenega blaga za izvršitev smrtne kazni, bodisi sprejme ali krši mednarodno zavezo o odpravi smrtne kazni za vse zločine, je primerno zagotoviti takojšnje izvajanje zadevnega akta Komisije, kadar je v primeru spremembe Priloge IV ali V k tej uredbi to potrebno iz izredno nujnih razlogov.
In order to allow the Union to respond quickly when new goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, are developed, and where there is a clear and immediate risk that those goods will be used for purposes that entail such human rights abuses, it is appropriate to provide for the immediate application of the relevant Commission act, where, in the case of amendment of Annex II or III to this Regulation, there are imperative grounds of urgency for such amendment.
Kadar se uporabi nujni postopek, je zlasti pomembno, da se Komisija pri svojem pripravljalnem delu ustrezno posvetuje, vključno na ravni strokovnjakov.
In order to allow the Union to respond quickly when one or more third countries either approve certain goods for use for capital punishment, or accept or violate an international commitment to abolish capital punishment for all crimes, it is appropriate to provide for the immediate application of the relevant Commission act, where, in the case of amendment of Annex IV or V to this Regulation, imperative grounds of urgency so require.
Ustanoviti bi bilo treba usklajevalno skupino.
Where the urgency procedure is followed, it is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.
Skupina bi morala služiti za platformo, na kateri bi strokovnjaki držav članic in Komisija izmenjavali informacije o upravnih praksah in razpravljali o vprašanjih razlage te uredbe, tehničnih vprašanjih glede blaga na seznamih, razvoju, povezanem s to uredbo, in vseh drugih vprašanjih, ki bi se utegnila pojaviti.
A coordination group should be established.
Zlasti bi skupina lahko razpravljala o vprašanjih, povezanih z naravo in predvidenim učinkom blaga, razpoložljivostjo blaga v tretjih državah in s tem, ali je blago posebej zasnovano ali spremenjeno za izvršitev smrtne kazni ali za mučenje ali druge oblike krutega, nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja.
The group should serve as a platform for Member States' experts and the Commission to exchange information on administrative practices and to discuss questions of interpretation of this Regulation, technical issues with respect to the goods listed, developments related to this Regulation and any other questions that may arise.
Če bi se Komisija odločila, da se s skupino posvetuje pri pripravi delegiranih aktov, bi morala to storiti v skladu z načeli, določenimi v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 13. aprila 2016 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje.
The group should, in particular, be able to discuss issues related to the nature and the intended effect of goods, the availability of goods in third countries and the question whether goods are specifically designed or modified for capital punishment or for torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Komisija ne nabavlja opreme za kazenski pregon, saj ni odgovorna za vzdrževanje javnega reda in miru, postopke v kazenskih zadevah ali izvrševanje sodnih odločb v kazenskih zadevah.
If the Commission decides to consult the group when preparing delegated acts, it should do so in accordance with the principles laid down in the Inter-institutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making.
Zato bi bilo treba vzpostaviti postopek, s katerim bi Komisija prejela informacije o opremi in proizvodih za kazenski pregon, ki niso navedeni na seznamih in so na trgu v Uniji, da bodo seznami blaga, katerega trgovanje je prepovedano ali nadzorovano, posodobljeni v skladu z novim razvojem.
The Commission does not procure equipment for law enforcement purposes since it is not responsible for maintenance of law and order, proceedings in criminal matters or the enforcement of judicial decisions in criminal matters.
Ko bi država članica na Komisijo naslovila zahtevo za dodajanje blaga v Prilogo II, Prilogo III ali Prilogo IV k tej uredbi, bi morala svojo zahtevo posredovati drugim državam članicam.
Therefore, a procedure should be established to ensure that the Commission receives information on non-listed law enforcement equipment and products marketed in the Union in order to ensure that the lists of goods whose trade is prohibited or controlled are updated to take account of new developments.
Namen ukrepov iz te uredbe je preprečitev izvršitev smrtne kazni in mučenja ter drugega krutega, nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja v tretjih državah.
When addressing its request to the Commission, the requesting Member State should forward its request to add goods to Annex II, to Annex III or to Annex IV to this Regulation to other Member States.
Med drugim ti ukrepi omejujejo trgovino s tretjimi državami z blagom, ki bi se lahko uporabilo za izvršitev smrtne kazni in mučenje ter drugo kruto, nečloveško ali poniževalno ravnanje ali kaznovanje.
The measures of this Regulation are intended to prevent both capital punishment and torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in third countries.
Šteje se, da ni potrebe po vzpostavitvi podobnega nadzora nad transakcijami znotraj Unije, saj države članice ne poznajo smrtne kazni in so gotovo sprejele ustrezne ukrepe za prepoved in preprečevanje mučenja in drugega krutega, nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja.
They comprise restrictions on trade with third countries in goods that could be used for the purpose of capital punishment or for the purpose of torture and other cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment or punishment.
V Smernicah za politiko EU do tretjih držav glede mučenja in drugega krutega, nečloveškega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja je zapisano, da je za učinkovito ukrepanje proti mučenju ter drugemu krutemu, nečloveškemu ali poniževalnemu ravnanju ali kaznovanju treba sprejeti ukrepe za preprečevanje uporabe, izdelovanja in trgovine z opremo, namenjene mučenju ali drugemu krutemu, nečloveškemu ali poniževalnemu ravnanju ali kaznovanju.
It is not considered necessary to establish similar controls on transactions within the Union as, in the Member States, capital punishment does not exist and Member States will have adopted appropriate measures to outlaw and prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Uvedba in uveljavljanje potrebnih omejitev glede uporabe in proizvodnje takšne opreme je naloga držav članic.
The Guidelines to EU Policy towards third countries on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment state that, in order to meet the objective of taking effective measures against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, measures should be taken to prevent the use, production and trade of equipment which is designed to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Komisija in države članice bi se morale vzajemno obveščati o ukrepih, sprejetih na podlagi te uredbe, in si izmenjevati vse druge razpoložljive pomembne informacije v zvezi s to uredbo.
It is up to the Member States to impose and enforce the necessary restrictions on the use and production of such equipment.
Države članice bi morale določiti pravila o kaznih, ki se uporabljajo za kršitve določb te uredbe, in zagotoviti, da se te kazni izvršujejo.
The Commission and the Member States should inform each other of the measures taken under this Regulation and of other relevant information at their disposal in connection with this Regulation.
Te kazni bi morale biti učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne –