natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Interested parties had an opportunity to comment on the initiation of the investigation and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da izrazijo pripombe o začetku preiskave in zahtevajo zaslišanje pred Komisijo in/ali pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih.
Two Union producers, represented by the complainant, took this opportunity to request the Commission to keep their names confidential for fear that they could face retaliation by customers or competitors concerned by this investigation, in accordance with Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation.
Proizvajalca Unije, ki ju je zastopal pritožnik, sta ob tej priložnosti v skladu s členom 19(1) osnovne uredbe zahtevala, da Komisija njuni imeni ohrani zaupni, saj sta se bala maščevanja strank ali konkurentov, ki jih zadeva ta preiskava.
Moreover, two cooperating Union producers requested the same status subsequently.
Poleg tega sta sodelujoča proizvajalca Unije pozneje zahtevala enak status.
The Commission individually examined the merits of each confidentiality request.
Komisija je posamično preučila utemeljenost vsakega zahtevka za zaupnost.
It established that there was indeed evidence of a significant possibility of retaliation in each case and accepted that the names of those companies should not be disclosed.
Ugotovila je, da v obeh primerih dejansko obstaja velika verjetnost maščevanja, zato se je strinjala s tem, da imen teh družb ne bi smeli razkriti.
Two exporting producers, the Giti Group and the Aeolus Group, claimed that the anonymity of two Union producers represented by the complainant could seriously affect the parties' right of defence as it is not possible to verify that the complainant effectively represents more than 25 % of total Union production.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika, skupina Giti Group in skupina Aeolus Group, sta trdila, da bi lahko anonimnost obeh proizvajalcev Unije, ki ju zastopa pritožnik, resno vplivala na pravico strank do obrambe, saj naj ne bi bilo mogoče preveriti, da pritožnik dejansko predstavlja več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje Unije.
In addition, the anonymity does not allow interested parties to know in which tier the complainant is active and thus, to meaningfully comment on the material injury that it could suffer due to Chinese exports of the product concerned to the Union.
Poleg tega zaradi anonimnosti zainteresirani strani nista mogli vedeti, v katerem razredu je dejaven pritožnik, in zato nista mogli podati smiselnih pripomb na materialno škodo, ki bi jo lahko utrpel zaradi kitajskega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
Moreover, the Giti Group claimed that, according to the complainant, tier 3 Union production represented only 16 % of total Union production.
Poleg tega je skupina Giti Group trdila, da po trditvah pritožnika proizvodnja Unije tretjega razreda predstavlja le 16 % celotne proizvodnje Unije.
Therefore, it argued that the initiation of the proceedings constituted an infringement of Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je trdila, da je začetek postopkov pomenil kršitev člena 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
Finally, the Giti Group and the Aeolus Group argued that confidentiality hinders interested parties from knowing whether sampled Union producers are related to Chinese exporting producers.
Poleg tega sta skupina Giti Group in skupina Aeolus Group trdili, da zaupnost zainteresirane strani ovira pri tem, da bi izvedeli, ali so vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije povezani s kitajskimi proizvajalci izvozniki.
Article 19 of the basic Regulation stipulates that the Commission must not reveal any information which is confidential without specific permission from the supplier of such information.
Člen 19 osnovne uredbe določa, da Komisija ne sme razkriti nobenih informacij, ki so zaupne, razen če dobavitelj teh informacij tega izrecno ne dovoli.
The Commission considered that the open version of the complaint permitted interested parties to assess the standing requirements.
Komisija je menila, da nezaupna različica pritožbe zainteresiranim stranem omogoča, da ocenijo zahteve v zvezi s procesnim upravičenjem.
Moreover, the representativity of the complainant needs to be assessed on the overall basis of the alleged injured industry and not per market tier.
Poleg tega je treba reprezentativnost pritožnika ocenjevati glede na celotno podlago domnevne škode za industrijo in ne glede na tržni razred.
Finally, the Commission was not convinced by the argument that the lack of knowledge of potential links between anonymous complainants and Chinese exporting producers should impede the rights of defence of interested parties.
Nazadnje, Komisije ni prepričala trditev, da naj bi pomanjkanje seznanjenosti glede morebitnih povezav med anonimnima pritožnikoma in kitajskimi proizvajalci izvozniki omejevalo pravico zainteresiranih strani do obrambe.
The claims levied against granting of confidentiality were therefore rejected.
Zahtevki zoper odobritev zaupnosti so bili zato zavrnjeni.
The Commission also informed producers in the Republic of Korea (‘Korea’), Japan, the Republic of India (‘India’), the Republic of South Africa (‘South Africa’), the Republic of Turkey (‘Turkey’), the Kingdom of Thailand (‘Thailand’) and the Federative Republic of Brazil (‘Brazil’) of the initiation and invited them to participate.
Komisija je obvestila tudi proizvajalce iz Republike Koreje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Koreja), Japonske, Republike Indije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Indija), Republike Južne Afrike (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Južna Afrika), Republike Turčije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Turčija), Kraljevine Tajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Tajska) in Zvezne republike Brazilije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Brazilija) ter jih povabila k sodelovanju.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged the United States of America (‘USA’) as a third market economy country (analogue country) within the meaning of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da namerava kot tretjo državo s tržnim gospodarstvom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: primerljiva država) uporabiti Združene države Amerike (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ZDA) v smislu člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Interested parties had an opportunity to comment and provided submissions in this regard (see below Section 3.1.2).
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da izrazijo pripombe, in so predložile stališča v zvezi s tem (glej oddelek 3.1.2).
The Commission selected a sample on the basis of the highest representative production and sales volumes whilst ensuring a geographical spread.
Izbrala je vzorec na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega proizvodnje in prodaje ter obenem zagotovila geografsko razpršenost.
The Commission invited interested parties to comment on the provisional sample.
Zainteresirane strani je pozvala, naj izrazijo pripombe glede začasnega vzorca.
Four interested parties submitted comments on the provisional sample (the Aeolus Group; the Giti Group; CRIA and CCCMC).
Štiri zainteresirane strani so predložile pripombe o začasnem vzorcu (skupina Aeolus Group; skupina Giti Group; CRIA in CCCMC).
In particular, they considered that the market segmentation into three tiers was not duly reflected in the provisional sample and that the sample should mirror as close as possible the percentage of tier 1, tier 2 and tier 3 production and sales out of the total Union production and sales.
Zlasti so menile, da se segmentacija trga na tri razrede ni ustrezno odražala v začasnem vzorcu in da bi moral vzorec čim bolje odražati delež proizvodnje in prodaje prvega, drugega in tretjega razreda glede na celotno proizvodnjo in prodajo Unije.
Further to that comment, on 25 September 2017, the Commission requested Union producers to provide additional information on the tiers with a view of establishing a revised sample of Union producers.
Na podlagi te pripombe je Komisija 25. septembra 2017 od proizvajalcev Unije zahtevala, da zagotovijo dodatne informacije o razredih, da bi lahko določila spremenjen vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
Cooperating Union producers that responded to the sample questionnaire include large, and small and medium-sized enterprises (‘SMEs’) and represent more than 50 % of the total estimated Union production and sales.
Sodelujoči proizvajalci Unije, ki so odgovorili na vprašalnik za vzorčenje, vključujejo velika podjetja ter mala in srednja podjetja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MSP) in predstavljajo več kot 50 % celotne ocenjene proizvodnje in prodaje Unije.
In order to establish the definitive sample, the Commission took into consideration the fragmentation of the tyres sector among different tiers, ensuring that all three tiers were covered by the sampled companies.
Za določitev končnega vzorca je Komisija upoštevala razdrobljenost sektorja pnevmatik med različnimi razredi, pri čemer je zagotovila, da so bili z vzorčenimi družbami zajeti vsi trije razredi.
In addition, to ensure that the situation of the SMEs was properly reflected in the injury analysis given that they represent around 15 % of the total Union sales volumes of Union producers, the Commission considered that SMEs should also be represented in the sample.
Poleg tega je Komisija menila, da bi morala biti v vzorcu zastopana MSP, da bi se zagotovilo, da se razmere za MSP ustrezno upoštevajo pri analizi škode, saj predstavljajo okoli 15 % celotne prodaje proizvajalcev Unije.
Eleven Union producers were sampled on the basis of:
Enajst proizvajalcev Unije je bilo vključenih v vzorec na podlagi:
the overall representativity in terms of size of the production and sales volume of the product concerned in the year 2016,
splošne reprezentativnosti v smislu obsega proizvodnje in prodaje zadevnega izdelka v letu 2016,
the representativity of tiers in terms of size of the production volume of the product concerned in the year 2016,
reprezentativnosti razredov v smislu obsega proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka v letu 2016,
the geographical spread, and
geografske razširjenosti ter
the representativity of the Union producers in terms of size, namely between SMEs and larger companies.
reprezentativnosti proizvajalcev Unije glede na velikost, in sicer med MSP in večjimi podjetji.
The sampled Union producers comprise both large companies and SMEs.
Vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije vključujejo tako velika podjetja kot MSP.
The selected Union producers are based in six Member States (Italy, Spain, Poland, Portugal, Germany and France) which together accounted for more than 36 % of Union production and sales reported by the cooperating Union producers.
Izbrani proizvajalci Unije imajo sedež v šestih državah članicah (v Italiji, Španiji, na Poljskem, Portugalskem, v Nemčiji in Franciji), ki skupaj predstavljajo več kot 36 % proizvodnje in prodaje Unije, ki so jo prijavili sodelujoči proizvajalci Unije.
On 22 December 2017, one of the sampled Union producers, the Polish producer, Geyer&Hosaja, informed the Commission that it had decided to stop cooperating with the investigation.
Eden od vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, tj. poljski proizvajalec Geyer&Hosaja, je 22. decembra 2017 obvestil Komisijo, da se je odločil, da ne bo več sodeloval v preiskavi.
The percentages mentioned in recital (25) above are not impacted by the withdrawal of this producer as its production represents less than 0,1 % of the total Union production.
Deleži, navedeni v uvodni izjavi 25 zgoraj, niso vplivali na umik tega proizvajalca, saj njegova proizvodnja predstavlja manj kot 0,1 % celotne proizvodnje Unije.
The Commission therefore concluded that the final sample is representative of the Union industry.
Zato je Komisija sklenila, da je končni vzorec reprezentativen za industrijo Unije.
Finally, the Giti Group submitted that the Commission should have terminated this investigation immediately because of the procedurally erroneous pre-selection of the sample of Union producers.
Nazadnje je skupina Giti Group trdila, da bi morala Komisija nemudoma zaključiti to preiskavo zaradi postopkovno napačne predizbire vzorca proizvajalcev Unije.
The Commission recalled that the provisional selection of a sample of Union producers is legally possible and conducive to an effective investigation within tight deadlines.
Komisija je opozorila, da je začasna izbira vzorca proizvajalcev Unije pravno mogoča in prispeva k učinkoviti preiskavi v kratkih rokih.
As demonstrated in recitals (21) to (25), the provisional sample was changed further to comments from interested parties.
Kot je razvidno iz uvodnih izjav 21 do 25, je bil začasni vzorec nadalje spremenjen glede na pripombe zainteresiranih strani.
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Komisija je nepovezane uvoznike pozvala, naj predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku, da bi se odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec.
Five importers came forward importing around 430000 units of imports from the PRC.
Javilo se je pet uvoznikov, ki uvozijo približno 430000 enot uvoza iz LRK.
Two companies were sampled accounting for [70 % - 90 %] of the importers that submitted a sampling form.
Vzorčeni sta bili dve družbi, ki sta predstavljali [70 %–90 %] uvoznikov, ki so predložili obrazec za vzorčenje.
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all exporting producers in the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse proizvajalce izvoznike iz LRK pozvala, naj zagotovijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
In addition, the Commission asked the Mission of the People's Republic of China to the Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Poleg tega je misijo Ljudske republike Kitajske pri Uniji pozvala, naj opredeli morebitne druge proizvajalce izvoznike, ki bi bili lahko zainteresirani za sodelovanje v preiskavi, in/ali stopi v stik z njimi.
49 exporting producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Zahtevane informacije je predložilo 49 proizvajalcev izvoznikov in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected a sample of the following four producers on the basis of the largest representative volume of exports to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available:
Komisija je v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec naslednjih štirih proizvajalcev na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega izvoza v Unijo, ki ga je bilo mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati:
Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd; Chonche Auto Double Happiness Tyre Corp., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd and Pirelli Tyre Co, Ltd (‘Aeolus Group’),
Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd; Chonche Auto Double Happiness Tyre Corp., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd in Pirelli Tyre Co, Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupina Aeolus Group),
Xingyuan Tire Group Ltd, Co. and Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co., Ltd (‘Xingyuan Group’),
Xingyuan Tire Group Ltd., Co. in Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co., Ltd. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupina Xingyuan Group),
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Ltd; Giti Tire (Anhui) Co., Ltd; Giti Tire (Fujian) Co., Ltd; Giti Tire (Hualin) Co., Ltd; Giti Tire (Yinchuan) Co., Ltd (‘Giti Group’),
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Ltd; Giti Tire (Anhui) Co., Ltd; Giti Tire (Fujian) Co., Ltd; Giti Tire (Hualin) Co., Ltd; Giti Tire (Yinchuan) Co., Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupina Giti Group),
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co., Ltd; Chongqing Hankook Tire Co., Ltd; Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd (‘Hankook Group’).
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co., Ltd.; Chongqing Hankook Tire Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd.; (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupina Hankook Group).
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned, and the authorities of the country concerned, were consulted on the selection of the sample.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe so bila z vsemi znanimi zadevnimi proizvajalci izvozniki in organi zadevne države opravljena posvetovanja o izbiri vzorca.
The Commission received comments from: (1) the complainant; (2) CRIA and CCCMC; and (3) an exporting producer — the Giti Group.
Komisija je prejela pripombe: (1) pritožnika, (2) CRIA in CCCMC; ter (3) proizvajalca izvoznika – skupina Giti Group.
The complainant claimed that the proposed sample was not representative enough as it did not sufficiently take into account the different price segments called tiers on the Union tyre market.
Pritožnik je trdil, da vzorec ni bil dovolj reprezentativen, saj ni v zadostni meri upošteval različnih cenovnih segmentov, imenovanih „razredi“, na trgu Unije za pnevmatike.
According to the complainant, the intermediate segment (tier 2) was over-represented in the sample while the overwhelming majority of Chinese exporters operated in the lower segment (tier 3), which was underrepresented.
Po navedbah pritožnika je bil srednji segment (drugi razred) v vzorcu prekomerno zastopan, medtem ko velika večina kitajskih izvoznikov deluje v nižjem segmentu (tretji razred), ki je bil premalo zastopan.
Therefore, it claimed that the sampled exporting producers would not adequately reflect the average import price to the Union.
Zato je trdil, da vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki ne bi ustrezno odražali povprečne uvozne cene za Unijo.
The complainant requested to replace sampled exporting producers in tier 2 with exporting producers in tier 3.
Pritožnik je zahteval nadomestitev vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz drugega razreda s proizvajalci izvozniki iz tretjega razreda.
CRIA, CCCMC and the Giti Group accepted, in principle, the provisionally selected sample, but considered that given the large number of exporting producers the sample's representativeness could be further increased by adding more companies.
CRIA, CCCMC in skupina Giti Group so načeloma sprejeli začasno izbrani vzorec, vendar so menili, da bi se lahko zaradi velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov reprezentativnost vzorca še dodatno izboljšala z vključitvijo več družb.
The Commission considered that the proposed sample consisted of exporting producers from both the intermediate and lower tiers accounting for over 50 % of total imports from the PRC to the Union.
Komisija je menila, da so v predlaganem vzorcu vključeni proizvajalci izvozniki iz srednjega in nižjega razreda predstavljali več kot 50 % skupnega uvoza iz LRK v Unijo.
Replacing the largest exporting producers from tier 2 with smaller exporting producers from tier 3 would make the sample unrepresentative given that a large portion of the total exports were, according to the available data, in the intermediate tier.
Če bi največje proizvajalce izvoznike iz drugega razreda nadomestili z manjšimi proizvajalci izvozniki iz tretjega razreda, vzorec ne bi bil reprezentativen, saj je bil po podatkih, ki so na voljo, velik delež celotnega izvoza opravljen v srednjem razredu.
Accordingly, the Commission decided to retain the provisionally selected sample and accordingly informed all interested parties on 19 October 2017.
Zato se je Komisija odločila ohraniti začasno izbrani vzorec in o tem 19. oktobra 2017 ustrezno obvestila vse zainteresirane strani.
Subsequently, the European Retreading Association (‘BIPAVER’) and the European Tyre & Rubber Manufacturers Association (‘ETRMA’) claimed that the finally selected sample could lead to a strong imbalance in the product mix between tier 2 and tier 3 tyres.
Nato sta Evropsko združenje za protektiranje pnevmatik (v nadaljnjem besedilu: BIPAVER) in Evropsko združenje proizvajalcev pnevmatik in gume (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ETRMA) trdila, da bi lahko dokončno izbrani vzorec privedel do močnega neravnovesja v naboru izdelkov med drugim in tretjim razredom pnevmatik.
In their view, the average import prices might not accurately reflect the part of import volumes that are most harmful to the Union industry.
Po njunem mnenju povprečne uvozne cene morda ne bi ustrezno izražale dela obsega uvoza, ki je najbolj škodljiv za industrijo Unije.
Therefore, they urged the Commission to reassess and amend the sample and, at least, add one exporting producer with significant export volumes from the tier 3.
Zato sta Komisijo pozvala, naj ponovno oceni in spremeni vzorec in doda vsaj še enega proizvajalca izvoznika z znatnim obsegom izvoza iz tretjega razreda.
The Commission reassessed whether it would be practically feasible to further enlarge the sample.
Komisija je ponovno ocenila, ali bi bilo dodatno povečanje vzorca praktično izvedljivo.
It pointed out that the groups of exporting producers selected in the sample consisted of: (1) 13 legal entities that were involved in the production and domestic sales of the product concerned; (2) two related exporters located outside of the Union; and (3) more than ten related importers located in the Union.
Poudarila je, da so skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov, izbranih v vzorec, sestavljene iz: (1) 13 pravnih subjektov, ki so vključeni v proizvodnjo in domačo prodajo zadevnega izdelka; (2) dveh povezanih izvoznikov s sedežem zunaj Unije in (3) več kot desetih povezanih uvoznikov s sedežem v Uniji.
The data provided by each of these entities needed to be processed and verified.
Podatke, ki jih je predložil vsak od teh subjektov, je bilo treba obdelati in preveriti.
Therefore, the Commission considered that more exporting producers could not be reasonably investigated within the time available.
Zato je Komisija menila, da več proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni mogoče razumno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
The Commission therefore did not change the finally selected sample as previously communicated to the interested parties.
Zato ni spremenila končno izbranega vzorca, kot je bilo predhodno sporočeno zainteresiranim stranem.
In addition to the four sampled exporting producers, ten exporting producers declared that, in the event that they are not selected to be in the sample, they would like to receive a questionnaire and other claim forms in order to fill them in and thus claim an individual examination under Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg štirih vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je deset proizvajalcev izvoznikov izjavilo, da bi v primeru, da ne bodo izbrani v vzorec, želeli prejeti vprašalnik in druge obrazce zahtevka, da jih izpolnijo in tako zahtevajo individualno preiskavo v skladu s členom 17(3) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission sent anti-dumping questionnaires to the four sampled Chinese exporting producers; the ten exporting producers that have requested the questionnaire and other claim forms as set out above as well as the sampled Union producers.
Komisija je protidampinške vprašalnike poslala štirim vzorčenim kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom; desetim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so zahtevali vprašalnik in druge obrazce zahtevka, kot je navedeno zgoraj, ter vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije.
Questionnaire replies were received from the four sampled Chinese exporting producers and from ten sampled Union producers.
Izpolnjeni vprašalniki so bili prejeti od štirih vzorčenih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in desetih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
None of the non-sampled exporting producers sent a reply to the questionnaires.
Noben od nevzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni odgovoril na vprašalnik.
The Commission sent MET claim forms to the two sampled exporting producers, the Hankook Group and the Giti Group, that requested market economy treatment in accordance with Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je poslala obrazce zahtevka za TGO dvema vzorčenima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma, skupini Giti Group in skupini Hankook Group, ki sta zahtevali tržnogospodarsko obravnavo v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe.
It also sent MET claim forms to non-sampled cooperating exporting producers had so requested.
Prav tako je poslala obrazce zahtevka za TGO nevzorčenim sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so to zahtevali.