natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The European Data Protection Supervisor should be informed of administrative measures and consulted on internal rules adopted by Union institutions and bodies in matters relating to their operation when they provide for the processing of personal data, lay down conditions for restricting the rights of data subjects or provide appropriate safeguards for data subject rights, in order to ensure that the intended processing complies with this Regulation, in particular as regards mitigating the risks involved for the data subject.
Odbor bi moral prispevati k dosledni uporabi Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 in Direktive (EU) 2016/680 po vsej Uniji, tudi s svetovanjem Komisiji.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 established the European Data Protection Board as an independent body of the Union with legal personality.
Hkrati bi moral Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov še naprej izvajati svojo nadzorno in svetovalno vlogo v zvezi z vsemi institucijami in organi Unije, na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo.
The Board should contribute to the consistent application of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 throughout the Union, including by advising the Commission.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti pravil o varstvu podatkov po vsej Uniji, bi si morala Komisija med pripravo predlogov ali priporočil prizadevati za posvetovanje z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov.
At the same time, the European Data Protection Supervisor should continue to exercise his or her supervisory and advisory functions in respect of all Union institutions and bodies, on his or her own initiative or upon request.
Posvetovanje Komisije bi moralo biti obvezno po sprejetju zakonodajnih aktov ali med pripravo delegiranih in izvedbenih aktov, kakor so opredeljeni v členih 289, 290 in 291 PDEU, ter po sprejetju priporočil in predlogov, ki se nanašajo na sporazume s tretjimi državami in mednarodnimi organizacijami, kakor je določeno v členu 218 PDEU, ki vplivajo na pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov.
In order to ensure consistency of data protection rules throughout the Union, when preparing proposals or recommendations, the Commission should endeavour to consult the European Data Protection Supervisor.
V takih primerih bi se morala Komisija posvetovati z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, razen kadar se mora v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/679 posvetovati z Evropskim odborom za varstvo podatkov, na primer o sklepih o ustreznosti ali delegiranih aktih o standardiziranih ikonah in zahtevah v zvezi z mehanizmi potrjevanja.
A consultation by the Commission should be obligatory following the adoption of legislative acts or during the preparation of delegated acts and implementing acts as defined in Article 289, 290 and 291 TFEU and following the adoption of recommendations and proposals relating to agreements with third countries and international organisations as provided for in Article 218 TFEU which have an impact on the right to protection of personal data.
Kadar je zadevni akt zlasti pomemben za varstvo pravic in svoboščin posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov, bi morala Komisija imeti možnost, da se posvetuje tudi z Evropskim odborom za varstvo podatkov.
In such cases, the Commission should be obliged to consult the European Data Protection Supervisor, except where the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 provides for mandatory consultation of the European Data Protection Board, for example on adequacy decisions or delegated acts on standardised icons and requirements for certification mechanisms.
V teh primerih bi moral Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov kot član Evropskega odbora za varstvo podatkov svoje delo uskladiti s tem odborom, da izdata skupno mnenje.
Where the act in question is of particular importance for the protection of rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data, the Commission should be able, in addition, to consult the European Data Protection Board.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov in, kadar je ustrezno, Evropski odbor za varstvo podatkov bi morala svoje mnenje v pisni obliki predložiti v osmih tednih.
In those cases, the European Data Protection Supervisor should, as a member of the European Data Protection Board, coordinate his or her work with the latter with a view to issuing a joint opinion.
Ta časovni okvir bi moral biti krajši v nujnih primerih ali kadar je drugače primerno, na primer kadar Komisija pripravlja delegirane in izvedbene akte.
The European Data Protection Supervisor, and where applicable, the European Data Protection Board should provide their written advice within eight weeks.
V skladu s členom 75 Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 bi moral Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov zagotoviti sekretariat Evropskemu odboru za varstvo podatkov.
That time-frame should be shorter in urgent cases or where otherwise appropriate, for example when the Commission is preparing delegated and implementing acts.
V vseh institucijah in organih Unije bi morala pooblaščena oseba za varstvo podatkov zagotoviti, da se določbe te uredbe uporabljajo, ter upravljavcem in obdelovalcem svetovati glede izpolnjevanja njihovih obveznosti.
In accordance with Article 75 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the European Data Protection Supervisor should provide the secretariat of the European Data Protection Board.
Ta pooblaščena oseba bi morala biti oseba s strokovnim znanjem s področja prava o varstvu podatkov in poznavanjem zadevnih praks, kar bi bilo treba določiti zlasti glede na dejanja obdelave podatkov, ki jih izvede upravljavec ali obdelovalec, in varstvo, potrebno pri osebnih podatkih, vključenih v obdelavo.
In all Union institutions and bodies a data protection officer should ensure that the provisions of this Regulation are applied and should advise controllers and processors on fulfilling their obligations.
Taki pooblaščeni osebi za varstvo podatkov bi moralo biti omogočeno, da svoje dolžnosti in naloge opravlja neodvisno.
That officer should be a person with expert knowledge of data protection law and practices, which should be determined in particular according to the data processing operations carried out by the controller or the processor and the protection required for the personal data involved.
Kadar se osebni podatki prenašajo iz institucij in organov Unije upravljavcem, obdelovalcem ali drugim uporabnikom v tretjih državah ali mednarodnim organizacijam, bi morala biti zagotovljena raven varstva posameznikov, ki jo v Uniji zagotavlja ta uredba.
Such data protection officers should be in a position to perform their duties and tasks in an independent manner.
Enaka jamstva bi se morala uporabljati v primeru nadaljnjih prenosov osebnih podatkov iz tretje države ali mednarodne organizacije upravljavcem, obdelovalcem v isti ali drugi tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji.
When personal data are transferred from the Union institutions and bodies to controllers, processors or other recipients in third countries or to international organisations, the level of protection of natural persons ensured in the Union by this Regulation should be guaranteed.
V vsakem primeru se lahko prenosi v tretje države in mednarodne organizacije izvajajo samo v popolni skladnosti s to uredbo in ob spoštovanju temeljnih pravic in svoboščin, zapisanih v Listini.
The same guarantees should apply in cases of onward transfers of personal data from the third country or international organisation to controllers, processors in the same or another third country or international organisation.
Prenos bi se lahko izvedel le, če upravljavec ali obdelovalec v skladu z drugimi določbami te uredbe izpolnjuje pogoje iz določb te uredbe v zvezi s prenosom osebnih podatkov v tretje države ali mednarodne organizacije.
In any event, transfers to third countries and international organisations may only be carried out in full compliance with this Regulation and respecting the fundamental rights and freedoms enshrined in the Charter.
Komisija lahko na podlagi člena 45 Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 ali člena 36 Direktive (EU) 2016/680 sklene, da tretja država, ozemlje ali določen sektor v tretji državi ali mednarodna organizacija nudi ustrezno raven varstva podatkov.
A transfer could take place only if, subject to the other provisions of this Regulation, the conditions laid down in the provisions of this Regulation relating to the transfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations are complied with by the controller or processor.
V takih primerih se lahko prenosi osebnih podatkov v to tretjo državo ali mednarodno organizacijo iz institucije ali organa Unije opravijo brez potrebe po pridobitvi dodatnega dovoljenja.
The Commission can decide, under Article 45 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or under Article 36 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, that a third country, a territory or specified sector within a third country or an international organisation offers an adequate level of data protection.
Če sklep o ustreznosti ni sprejet, bi moral upravljavec ali obdelovalec sprejeti ukrepe, na podlagi katerih pomanjkanje varstva podatkov v tretji državi nadomesti z ustreznimi zaščitnimi ukrepi za posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki.
In such cases, transfers of personal data to that third country or international organisation by a Union institution or body can take place without the need to obtain any further authorisation.
Taki ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi so lahko sestavljeni iz uporabe standardnih določil o varstvu podatkov, ki jih sprejme Komisija ali Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov, ali pogodbenih določil, ki jih odobri Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov.
In the absence of an adequacy decision, the controller or processor should take measures to compensate for the lack of data protection in a third country by way of appropriate safeguards for the data subject.
Kadar obdelovalec ni institucija ali organ Unije, so lahko navedeni ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi sestavljeni tudi iz zavezujočih poslovnih pravil, kodeksov ravnanja in mehanizmov potrjevanja, ki se uporabljajo za mednarodne prenose na podlagi Uredbe (EU) 2016/679.
Such appropriate safeguards can consist of making use of standard data protection clauses adopted by the Commission, standard data protection clauses adopted by the European Data Protection Supervisor or contractual clauses authorised by the European Data Protection Supervisor.
S temi zaščitnimi ukrepi bi bilo treba zagotoviti skladnost z zahtevami glede varstva podatkov in pravicami posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, ki ustrezajo obdelavi znotraj Unije, vključno z razpoložljivostjo izvršljivih pravic posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, in učinkovitih pravnih sredstev, tudi pravico do učinkovitega upravnega ali sodnega varstva ali odškodnine, v Uniji ali tretji državi.
Where the processor is not a Union institution or body those appropriate safeguards can also consist of binding corporate rules, codes of conduct and certification mechanisms used for international transfers under Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Nanašati bi se morali zlasti na skladnost s splošnimi načeli v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov ter načeli vgrajenega in privzetega varstva podatkov.
Those safeguards should ensure compliance with data protection requirements and the rights of the data subjects appropriate to processing within the Union, including the availability of enforceable data subject rights and of effective legal remedies, including to obtain effective administrative or judicial redress and to claim compensation, in the Union or in a third country.
Prenose z javnimi organi ali telesi v tretjih državah oziroma z mednarodnimi organizacijami z ustreznimi nalogami ali funkcijami lahko opravijo tudi institucije in organi Unije, tudi na podlagi določb, ki se vključijo v upravne dogovore, kot je memorandum o soglasju, s katerimi se zagotavljajo izvršljive in učinkovite pravice posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
They should relate in particular to compliance with the general principles relating to personal data processing, the principles of data protection by design and by default.
Kadar so zaščitni ukrepi določeni v upravnih dogovorih, ki niso pravno zavezujoči, bi bilo treba pridobiti dovoljenje Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov.
Transfers may also be carried out by Union institutions and bodies to public authorities or bodies in third countries or to international organisations with corresponding duties or functions, including on the basis of provisions to be inserted into administrative arrangements, such as a memorandum of understanding, providing for enforceable and effective rights for data subjects.
Možnost, ki jo ima upravljavec ali obdelovalec glede uporabe standardnih določil o varstvu podatkov, ki jih sprejme Komisija ali Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov, upravljavcem ali obdelovalcem ne bi smela preprečiti niti, da standardna določila o varstvu podatkov vključijo v obsežnejšo pogodbo, kot je pogodba med obdelovalcem in drugim obdelovalcem, niti, da dodajo druga določila ali dodatne zaščitne ukrepe, če ti neposredno ali posredno ne nasprotujejo standardnim pogodbenim določilom Komisije ali Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov ali posegajo v temeljne pravice ali svoboščine posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
Authorisation by the European Data Protection Supervisor should be obtained when the safeguards are provided for in administrative arrangements that are not legally binding.
Upravljavce in obdelovalce bi bilo treba spodbujati, da vzpostavijo dodatne zaščitne ukrepe s pomočjo pogodbenih obveznosti, ki bi dopolnjevale standardna določila o varstvu podatkov.
The possibility for the controller or processor to use standard data-protection clauses adopted by the Commission or by the European Data Protection Supervisor should prevent controllers or processors neither from including the standard data-protection clauses in a wider contract, such as a contract between the processor and another processor, nor from adding other clauses or additional safeguards provided that they do not contradict, directly or indirectly, the standard contractual clauses adopted by the Commission or by the European Data Protection Supervisor or prejudice the fundamental rights or freedoms of the data subjects.
Nekatere tretje države sprejemajo zakone, predpise in druge pravne akte, ki neposredno urejajo dejavnosti obdelave institucij in organov Unije.
Controllers and processors should be encouraged to provide additional safeguards via contractual commitments that supplement standard data-protection clauses.
To lahko vključuje sodbe sodišč ali odločbe upravnih organov tretjih držav, ki od upravljavca ali obdelovalca zahtevajo prenos ali razkritje osebnih podatkov in ki ne temeljijo na mednarodnem sporazumu, sklenjenem med tretjo državo prosilko in Unijo.
Some third countries adopt laws, regulations and other legal acts which purport to directly regulate the processing activities of Union institutions and bodies.
Zunajozemeljska uporaba teh zakonov, predpisov in drugih pravnih aktov lahko krši mednarodno pravo in ovira doseganje varstva posameznikov, ki ga v Uniji zagotavlja ta uredba.
This may include judgments of courts or tribunals or decisions of administrative authorities in third countries requiring a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data, and which are not based on an international agreement in force between the requesting third country and the Union.
Prenosi bi smeli biti dovoljeni samo, kadar so izpolnjeni pogoji iz te uredbe za prenos v tretje države.
The extraterritorial application of those laws, regulations and other legal acts may be in breach of international law and may impede the attainment of the protection of natural persons ensured in the Union by this Regulation.
To je lahko med drugim v primeru, kadar je razkritje potrebno zaradi pomembnega javnega interesa, priznanega s pravom Unije.
Transfers should only be allowed where the conditions of this Regulation for a transfer to third countries are met.
V posebnih primerih bi morala biti predvidena možnost prenosov v določenih okoliščinah, kadar je posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, dal svojo izrecno privolitev, kadar je prenos občasen in potreben zaradi pogodbe ali pravnega zahtevka, ne glede na to, ali gre za sodni postopek ali upravni ali kateri koli izvensodni postopek, vključno s postopki pred regulativnimi organi.
This may be the case, inter alia, where disclosure is necessary for an important ground of public interest recognised in Union law.
Možnost prenosov bi morala biti predvidena tudi, kadar to zahtevajo pomembni razlogi v javnem interesu, določeni s pravom Unije, ali kadar je prenos izveden iz registra, vzpostavljenega z zakonom in namenjenega vpogledu javnosti ali oseb z zakonitim interesom.
Provision should be made in specific situations for the possibility for transfers in certain circumstances where the data subject has given his or her explicit consent, where the transfer is occasional and necessary in relation to a contract or a legal claim, regardless of whether in a judicial procedure or whether in an administrative or any out-of-court procedure, including procedures before regulatory bodies.
V slednjem primeru tak prenos ne bi smel vključevati celotnih osebnih podatkov ali celotnih vrst podatkov, ki jih vsebuje register, razen če to dovoljuje pravo Unije, in kadar je register namenjen vpogledu oseb, ki imajo zakoniti interes, bi bilo treba prenos opraviti samo na zahtevo teh oseb ali če bodo te osebe uporabniki, pri čemer je treba v celoti upoštevati interese in temeljne pravice posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
Provision should also be made for the possibility for transfers where important grounds of public interest laid down by Union law so require or where the transfer is made from a register established by law and intended for consultation by the public or persons having a legitimate interest.
Ta odstopanja bi se morala uporabljati zlasti za prenose podatkov, ki so zahtevani in potrebni zaradi pomembnih razlogov javnega interesa, kot v primeru mednarodne izmenjave podatkov med institucijami in organi Unije ter organi za varstvo konkurence, davčnimi ali carinskimi upravami, finančnimi nadzornimi organi in službami, pristojnimi za zadeve na področju socialne varnosti ali javnega zdravja, denimo v primeru sledenja stikov za nalezljive bolezni ali zaradi zmanjšanja in/ali odprave uporabe nedovoljenih poživil v športu.
In the latter case, such a transfer should not involve the entirety of the personal data or entire categories of the data contained in the register, unless authorised by Union law, and, when the register is intended for consultation by persons having a legitimate interest, the transfer should be made only at the request of those persons or, if they are to be the recipients, taking into full account the interests and fundamental rights of the data subject.
Prenos osebnih podatkov bi moral prav tako veljati za zakonitega, kadar je treba zaščititi ključni interes posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ali interese življenjskega pomena za druge osebe, vključno s telesno nedotakljivostjo ali življenjem, če posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ni sposoben dati privolitve.
Those derogations should in particular apply to data transfers required and necessary for important reasons of public interest, for example in cases of international data exchange between Union institutions and bodies and competition authorities, tax or customs administrations, financial supervisory authorities and services competent for social security matters or for public health, for example in the case of contact tracing for contagious diseases or in order to reduce and/or eliminate doping in sport.
Če sklepa o ustreznosti ni, se lahko v pravu Unije zaradi pomembnih razlogov javnega interesa izrecno določijo omejitve prenosa posebnih kategorij podatkov v tretjo državo ali mednarodno organizacijo.
A transfer of personal data should also be regarded as lawful where it is necessary to protect an interest which is essential for the data subject’s or another person’s vital interests, including physical integrity or life, if the data subject is incapable of giving consent.
Vsak prenos osebnih podatkov posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki in ki fizično ali pravno ni sposoben dati privolitve, mednarodni humanitarni organizaciji, ki se opravi z namenom izvajanja naloge v skladu z Ženevskimi konvencijami ali za skladnost z mednarodnim humanitarnim pravom, ki se uporablja za oborožene spore, bi se lahko štel za potrebnega, če je v pomembnem javnem interesu ali življenjskega interesa za posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki.
In the absence of an adequacy decision, Union law may, for important reasons of public interest, expressly set limits to the transfer of specific categories of data to a third country or an international organisation.
V vsakem primeru bi moral upravljavec ali obdelovalec, če Komisija ni sprejela sklepa o ustrezni ravni varstva podatkov v tretji državi, uporabiti rešitve, ki posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, zagotavljajo izvršljive in učinkovite pravice glede obdelave njihovih podatkov v Uniji po prenosu teh podatkov, tako da lahko še vedno uresničujejo temeljne pravice in zaščitne ukrepe.
Any transfer to an international humanitarian organisation of personal data of a data subject who is physically or legally incapable of giving consent, with a view to accomplishing a task incumbent under the Geneva Conventions or to complying with international humanitarian law applicable in armed conflicts, could be considered to be necessary for an important reason of public interest or because it is in the vital interest of the data subject.
Pri čezmejnem prenosu osebnih podatkov zunaj Unije se lahko poveča tveganje v zvezi z zmožnostjo posameznikov za uresničevanje pravic do varstva podatkov, zlasti da se zaščitijo pred nezakonito uporabo ali razkritjem navedenih podatkov.
In any case, where the Commission has taken no decision on the adequate level of data protection in a third country, the controller or processor should make use of solutions that provide data subjects with enforceable and effective rights as regards the processing of their data in the Union once those data have been transferred so that that they will continue to benefit from fundamental rights and safeguards.
Hkrati lahko nacionalni nadzorni organi in Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov ugotovijo, da ne morejo obravnavati pritožb ali izvesti preiskav v zvezi z dejavnostmi zunaj svoje pristojnosti.
When personal data moves across borders outside the Union it may put at increased risk the ability of natural persons to exercise data protection rights, in particular to protect themselves from the unlawful use or disclosure of that information.
Njihova prizadevanja za čezmejno sodelovanje lahko ovirajo tudi nezadostna pooblastila za preprečevanje kršitev ali njihovo odpravo, neskladne pravne ureditve in praktične ovire, na primer omejitev virov.
At the same time, national supervisory authorities and the European Data Protection Supervisor can be unable to pursue complaints or conduct investigations relating to the activities outside their jurisdiction.
Zato bi bilo treba spodbujati tesnejše sodelovanje med Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov in nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi, da bi jim pomagali izmenjavati informacije s tujimi nadzornimi organi za varstvo podatkov.
Their efforts to work together in the cross-border context can also be hampered by insufficient preventive or remedial powers, inconsistent legal regimes, and practical obstacles like resource constraints.
Ustanovitev Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001, ki je pooblaščen, da svoje naloge in pooblastila izvaja popolnoma neodvisno, je bistveni del varstva posameznikov pri obdelavi njihovih osebnih podatkov.
Therefore, closer cooperation between the European Data Protection Supervisor and national supervisory authorities should be promoted to help the exchange of information with their international counterparts.
Ta uredba bi morala dodatno okrepiti in pojasniti njegovo vlogo in neodvisnost.