natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In assessing whether a concrete and apparent risk exists that a child may be imminently and unlawfully removed from a Member State, the competent authority should take into account the child's personal circumstances and the environment to which the child is exposed.
Takšne razpise ukrepov bi bilo treba vnesti, če bi bili otroci zaradi potovanja tvegali, da postanejo žrtve trgovine z ljudmi ali prisilnih porok, pohabljanja ženskih spolnih organov ali drugih oblik nasilja na podlagi spola, da bi postali žrtve terorističnih kaznivih dejanj oziroma da bi sodelovali v njih, da bi bili rekrutirani ali vključeni v oborožene skupine ali bili prisiljeni, da aktivno sodelujejo v spopadih.
This Regulation should establish a new category of alerts for certain categories of vulnerable persons who need to be prevented from travelling.
Razpise ukrepov za ranljive odrasle osebe, ki jim je treba zaradi njihove lastne zaščite preprečiti potovanje, bi bilo treba vnesti, če bi zaradi potovanja tvegali, da postanejo žrtve trgovine z ljudmi ali nasilja na podlagi spola.
Persons who, due to their age, disabilities, or their family circumstances require protection should be considered vulnerable.
Da bi zagotovili stroge in ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe, bi bilo treba razpise ukrepov za otroke ali druge ranljive osebe, ki jim je treba preprečiti potovanje, kadar je v skladu z nacionalnim pravom to potrebno, vnesti v SIS na podlagi odločitve sodnega organa ali odločitve pristojnega organa, potrjenega s strani sodnega organa.
Alerts on children who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection should be entered into SIS if there is a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State.
Treba bi bilo uvesti nov ukrep, da se omogoči ustavitev in zaslišanje osebe, da država članica izdajateljica pridobi podrobne informacije.
Such alerts should be entered if the travel would put them at risk of becoming victims of trafficking in human beings or of forced marriage, female genital mutilation or other forms of gender-based violence, of becoming victims or being involved in terrorist offences, of being conscripted or enlisted into armed groups, or of being made to participate actively in hostilities.
Ta ukrep bi se moral uporabiti v primerih, kadar je oseba na podlagi jasnih indicev osumljena, da namerava izvršiti ali da je izvršila katero koli kaznivo dejanje iz člena 2(1) in (2) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ, kadar so nadaljnje informacije potrebne za izvršitev zaporne kazni ali ukrepa odvzema prostosti zoper osebo, ki je bila obsojena za katero koli kaznivo dejanje iz člena 2(1) in (2) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ, ali kadar obstaja razlog za sum, da bo zagrešila katero koli od teh dejanj.
Alerts on vulnerable adults who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection should be entered if travel would put them at risk of becoming victims of trafficking in human beings or gender-based violence.
Hkrati ta ukrep, ki bi ga bilo treba uvesti, ne bi smel posegati v obstoječe mehanizme medsebojne pravne pomoči.
In order to guarantee strict and appropriate safeguards, alerts on children or other vulnerable persons who need to be prevented from travelling should, where required under national law, be entered into SIS following a decision by a judicial authority or a decision by a competent authority confirmed by a judicial authority.
Zagotoviti bi moral zadostne informacije, da se sprejme odločitev o nadaljnjih ukrepih.
A new action to be taken should be introduced to allow a person to be stopped and interviewed in order for the issuing Member State to obtain detailed information.
Ta novi ukrep ne bi smel privesti do preiskave osebe ali njenega prijetja.
This action should apply in cases where, based on a clear indication, a person is suspected of intending to commit or of committing any of the offences referred to in Article 2(1) and (2) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, where further information is needed to execute a custodial sentence or detention order against a person convicted of any of the offences referred to in Article 2(1) and (2) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, or where there is a reason to believe that he or she will commit any of those offences.
Procesne pravice osumljenih in obtoženih oseb v skladu s pravom Unije in nacionalnim pravom pa bi se morale ohraniti, vključno z njihovo pravico do dostopa do odvetnika v skladu z Direktivo 2013/48/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
This action to be taken should also be without prejudice to existing mutual legal assistance mechanisms.
V primeru razpisov ukrepov za predmete zaradi zasega ali za zagotovitev dokazov v kazenskem postopku bi bilo treba zadevne predmete zaseči v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, da se ugotovi, ali in v skladu s katerimi pogoji se predmet zaseže, zlasti če je v lasti njegovega zakonitega lastnika.
It should supply sufficient information to decide upon further actions.
SIS bi moral vsebovati nove kategorije predmetov velike vrednosti, kot so izdelki informacijske tehnologije, ki se lahko identificirajo in poiščejo na podlagi identifikacijske številke.
This new action should not amount to searching the person nor to his or her arrest.
Kar zadeva razpise ukrepov, vnesene v SIS, o dokumentih zaradi zasega ali zagotovitve dokazov v kazenskih postopkih, bi bilo treba izraz „lažni“ razumeti tako, da se nanaša tako na ponarejene kot na predrugačene dokumente.
The procedural rights of suspects and accused persons under Union and national law should be preserved, including their right to have access to a lawyer in accordance with Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba omogočiti, da k razpisu ukrepa dodajo označitev, kar pomeni, da na svojem ozemlju ne bodo izvedle ukrepa, ki ga zahteva razpis ukrepa.
In the case of alerts on objects for seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings, the objects concerned should be seized in accordance with national law that determines if and in accordance with which conditions an object is to be seized, particularly if it is in the possession of its rightful owner.
Pri vnosu razpisov za prijetje zaradi predaje, se ne bi smelo nobene določbe iz te uredbe razlagati tako, da odstopa od določb iz Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ ali preprečuje njihovo uporabo.
SIS should contain new categories of objects of high value, such as items of information technology which can be identified and searched with a unique identification number.
Odločitev, da se razpisu ukrepa zaradi neizvršitve evropskega naloga za prijetje doda označitev, bi morala temeljiti samo na razlogih za zavrnitev iz navedenega okvirnega sklepa.
As regards alerts entered into SIS on documents for seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings, the term ‘false’ should be construed as encompassing both forged and counterfeit documents.
Kadar se doda označitev in je bilo ugotovljeno, kje se nahaja oziroma se je nahajala oseba, za katero se zahteva prijetje zaradi predaje, bi bilo treba informacijo, kje se oseba nahaja oziroma se je nahajala, zmeraj sporočiti sodnemu organu izdajatelju, ki se lahko odloči, da pristojnemu sodnemu organu posreduje evropski nalog za prijetje v skladu z določbami Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ.
It should be possible for a Member State to add an indication, called a flag, to an alert, to the effect that the action to be taken on the basis of the alert will not be taken on its territory.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da vzpostavijo povezave med razpisi ukrepov v SIS.
When alerts are entered for arrest for surrender purposes, nothing in this Regulation should be construed so as to derogate from or prevent the application of the provisions contained in the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA.
Vzpostavitev povezav med dvema ali več razpisi ukrepov ne bi smela vplivati na ukrep, ki ga je treba sprejeti, roke za preverjanje razpisov ukrepov ali pravice dostopa do razpisov ukrepov.
The decision to add a flag to an alert with a view to the non-execution of a European Arrest Warrant should be based only on the grounds for refusal contained in that Framework Decision.
Razpisi ukrepov bi se morali hraniti v SIS le toliko časa, kolikor je to potrebno za izpolnitev specifičnega namena, za katerega so bili vneseni.
When a flag has been added and the whereabouts of the person wanted for arrest for surrender become known, the person's whereabouts should always be communicated to the issuing judicial authority, which may decide to transmit a European Arrest Warrant to the competent judicial authority in accordance with the provisions of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA.
Roki za preverjanje za različne kategorije razpisov ukrepov bi morali ustrezati njihovemu namenu.
It should be possible for Member States to establish links between alerts in SIS.
Razpise ukrepov za predmete, ki so vezani na razpis ukrepa za osebo, bi bilo treba hraniti samo tako dolgo, dokler se hrani razpis ukrepa za to osebo.
The establishment of links between two or more alerts should have no impact on the action to be taken, the review period for alerts or the access rights to the alerts.
Odločitve o nadaljnji ohranitvi razpisov ukrepov za osebe bi morale temeljiti na celoviti posamični oceni.
Alerts should not be kept in SIS longer than the time required to fulfil the specific purposes for which they were entered.
Države članice bi morale v predpisanem roku za preverjanje preveriti razpise ukrepov za osebe in predmete ter hraniti statistične podatke o številu razpisov ukrepov, katerih obdobje hrambe je bilo podaljšano.
The review periods for different categories of alerts should be appropriate in light of their purpose.
Za vnašanje razpisa ukrepa v SIS in podaljševanje obdobja izteka veljavnosti razpisa ukrepa v SIS bi morala veljati zahteva sorazmernosti, na podlagi katere se preuči, ali je konkretna zadeva primerna, relevantna in dovolj pomembna, da se v SIS vnese razpis ukrepa.
Alerts on objects which are linked to an alert on a person should only be kept for as long as the alert on the person is kept.
V primeru terorističnih kaznivih dejanj bi bilo treba zadevo obravnavati kot primerno, relevantno in dovolj pomembno, da se v SIS vnese razpis ukrepa.
Decisions to retain alerts on persons should be based on a comprehensive individual assessment.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba zaradi javne ali nacionalne varnosti dovoliti, da razpisa ukrepov izjemoma ne vnesejo v SIS, kadar je verjetno, da bi to oviralo uradne ali zakonite poizvedbe, preiskave ali postopke.
Member States should review alerts on persons and objects within the prescribed review periods and should keep statistics on the number of alerts for which the retention period has been extended.
Treba je določiti pravila v zvezi z izbrisom razpisov ukrepov.
Entering an alert into SIS and extending the expiry date of an alert in SIS should be subject to a proportionality requirement involving examination of whether a concrete case is adequate, relevant and important enough to warrant insertion of an alert in SIS.
Razpis ukrepa bi bilo treba hraniti le toliko časa, kolikor je to potrebno za dosego namena, zaradi katerega je bil vnesen.
Where terrorist offences are concerned, the case should be considered adequate, relevant and important enough to warrant an alert in SIS.
Ob upoštevanju različnih praks držav članic v zvezi z opredelitvijo trenutka, ko razpis ukrepa doseže svoj namen, je primerno določiti podrobna merila za vsako kategorijo razpisov ukrepov in tako opredeliti, kdaj bi ga bilo treba izbrisati.
For public or national security reasons, Member States should be allowed exceptionally to refrain from entering an alert into SIS when it is likely that this would obstruct official or legal inquiries, investigations or procedures.
Celovitost podatkov SIS je ključnega pomena.
It is necessary to establish rules concerning the deletion of alerts.
Zato bi bilo treba zagotoviti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe za obdelavo podatkov SIS na centralni in nacionalni ravni, da se zagotovi varnost podatkov od konca do konca.
An alert should be kept only for the time required to achieve the purpose for which it was entered.
Organe, ki sodelujejo pri obdelavi podatkov, bi morale zavezovati varnostne zahteve te uredbe in zanje bi moral veljati enoten postopek poročanja o incidentih.
Considering the diverging practices of Member States in determining the point in time when an alert has fulfilled its purpose, it is appropriate to set out detailed criteria for each category of alert to determine when it should be deleted.
Njihovo osebje bi moralo biti ustrezno usposobljeno in obveščeno o morebitnih kršitvah in kaznih v tej zvezi.
The integrity of SIS data is of primary importance.
Podatki, obdelani v SIS, in povezane dopolnilne informacije, ki se izmenjujejo na podlagi te uredbe, se ne bi smeli posredovati ali dajati na voljo tretjim državam ali mednarodnim organizacijam.
Therefore, appropriate safeguards should be provided to process SIS data at central as well as at national level to ensure the end-to-end security of the data.
Primerno je, da se dostop do SIS dodeli službam, pristojnim za registracijo vozil, plovil in zrakoplovov, s čimer se jim omogoči, da preverijo, ali se zadevno prevozno sredstvo v državah članicah že išče zaradi zasega.
The authorities involved in the data processing should be bound by the security requirements of this Regulation and be subject to a uniform incident reporting procedure.
Primerno je tudi, da se dostop do SIS dodeli službam, pristojnim za registracijo strelnega orožja, s čimer se jim omogoči, da preverijo, ali se zadevno strelno orožje v državah članicah že išče zaradi zasega oziroma ali je bil vnesen razpis ukrepa za osebo, ki zaprosi za registracijo.
Their staff should be appropriately trained and be informed of any offences and penalties in this respect.
Neposreden dostop do SIS bi bilo treba zagotoviti le pristojnim vladnim službam.
Data processed in SIS and the related supplementary information exchanged pursuant to this Regulation should not be transferred or made available to third countries or to international organisations.
Ta dostop bi moral biti omejen na razpise ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na zadevna prevozna sredstva, njihove registracijske dokumente ali registrsko številko oziroma na strelno orožje in osebe, ki zaprosijo za registracijo.
It is appropriate to grant access to SIS to services responsible for registering vehicles, boats and aircraft in order to allow them to verify whether the conveyance concerned is being searched for in Member States for seizure.
Te službe bi morale vsak zadetek v SIS sporočiti policiji, ki bi morala nadalje ukrepati v skladu z določenim razpisom ukrepa v SIS in prek uradov SIRENE o zadetku uradno obvestiti državo članico izdajateljico.
It is also appropriate to grant access to SIS to services responsible for registering firearms in order to allow them to verify whether the firearm concerned is being searched for in Member States for seizure or whether there is an alert on the person requesting the registration.
Brez poseganja v podrobnejša pravila iz te uredbe bi bilo treba za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, vključno z zbiranjem in sporočanjem osebnih podatkov, ki jih pristojni nacionalni organi obdelujejo na podlagi te uredbe za namene preprečevanja, odkrivanja, preiskovanja ali preganjanja terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanja kazenskih sankcij, uporabljati nacionalni zakoni, predpisi in upravne določbe, sprejeti v skladu z Direktivo (EU) 2016/680.
Direct access to SIS should only be provided to competent government services.
Za dostop do podatkov, vnesenih v SIS, in pravico do opravljanja poizvedb v teh podatkih s strani pristojnih nacionalnih organov, ki so pristojni za preprečevanje, odkrivanje, preiskovanje ali preganjanje terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, bi morale veljati vse zadevne določbe iz te uredbe in Direktive (EU) 2016/680, kot so bile prenesene v nacionalno zakonodajo, zlasti glede spremljanja s strani nadzornih organov iz Direktive (EU) 2016/680.
This access should be limited to alerts concerning the respective conveyances and their registration document or number plate or firearms and persons requesting the registration.
Brez poseganja v podrobnejša pravila glede obdelave osebnih podatkov iz te uredbe bi bilo treba za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki jo na podlagi te uredbe izvajajo države članice, uporabljati Uredbo (EU) 2016/679, razen če to obdelavo izvajajo pristojni nacionalni organi za namene preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali preganjanja terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj.
Any hit in SIS should be reported by such services to the police authorities, who should take further action in line with the particular alert in SIS and notify the issuing Member State of the hit through the SIRENE Bureaux.
Uredba (EU) 2018/1725 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta bi se morala uporabljati za obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani institucij in organov Unije, kadar izvajajo svoje pristojnosti v okviru te uredbe.
Without prejudice to more specific rules laid down in this Regulation, the national laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted pursuant to Directive (EU) 2016/680 should apply to the processing, including collection and communication of personal data under this Regulation by the national competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties.
Za obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani Europola na podlagi te uredbe, bi se morala uporabljati Uredba (EU) 2016/794 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Access to data entered into SIS and the right to search such data by national competent authorities which are responsible for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties are to be subject to all relevant provisions of this Regulation and those of Directive (EU) 2016/680 as transposed into national law, and in particular to monitoring by the supervisory authorities referred to in Directive (EU) 2016/680.
V primerih, ko poizvedbe, ki jih v SIS opravijo nacionalni člani Eurojusta in njihovi pomočniki, razkrijejo, da je ena od držav članic vnesla razpis ukrepa, Eurojust ne more izvesti zahtevanega ukrepa.
Without prejudice to more specific rules laid down in this Regulation for the processing of personal data, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should apply to the processing of personal data by the Member States under this Regulation unless such processing is carried out by the national competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of terrorist offences or of other serious criminal offences.
Zato bi moral o tem obvestiti zadevno državo članico, da bi lahko ustrezno ukrepala v zadevi.
Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council should apply to the processing of personal data by the institutions and bodies of the Union when carrying out their responsibilities under this Regulation.
Pri uporabi SIS bi morali pristojni organi zagotoviti spoštovanje dostojanstva in integritete oseb, katerih podatki se obdelujejo.
Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council should apply to the processing of personal data by Europol under this Regulation.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov za namene te uredbe ne sme povzročiti diskriminacije oseb na kakršni koli podlagi, na primer zaradi spola, rase ali etničnega porekla, vere ali prepričanja, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti.
In cases when searches carried out in SIS by national members of Eurojust and their assistants reveal the existence of an alert entered by a Member State, Eurojust cannot take the requested action.
Kar zadeva zaupnost, bi se morale za uradnike in druge uslužbence, katerih delo je povezano s SIS, uporabljati ustrezne določbe Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropske unije in Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Unije iz Uredbe Sveta (EGS, Euratom, ESPJ) št. 259/68 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Kadrovski predpisi).
Therefore, it should inform the Member State concerned to allow it to follow up the case.
Države članice in eu-LISA bi morale imeti varnostne načrte za omogočanje lažjega izvajanja varnostnih obveznosti ter bi morale medsebojno sodelovati z namenom obravnave vprašanj glede varnosti iz skupnega zornega kota.
When using SIS, the competent authorities should ensure that the dignity and integrity of the person whose data are processed are respected.
Neodvisni nacionalni nadzorni organi iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 in Direktive (EU) 2016/680 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nadzorni organi), bi morali spremljati zakonitost obdelovanja osebnih podatkov na podlagi te uredbe, vključno prek izmenjave dopolnilnih podatkov.
Processing of personal data for the purposes of this Regulation is not to result in discrimination against persons on any grounds, such as sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
Nadzorni organi bi morali prejeti zadostna sredstva za izvajanje te naloge.
Insofar as confidentiality is concerned, the relevant provisions of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Union, laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (‘Staff Regulations’) should apply to officials or other servants employed and working in connection with SIS.
Treba bi bilo določiti pravice posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, do dostopa do podatkov, popravkov in izbrisa njihovih osebnih podatkov, ki so shranjeni v SIS, vsa naknadna pravna sredstva pred nacionalnimi sodišči ter vzajemno priznavanje sodb.
Both the Member States and eu-LISA should maintain security plans in order to facilitate the implementation of security obligations and should cooperate with each other in order to address security issues from a common perspective.
Primerno je tudi, da se od držav članic zahtevajo letni statistični podatki.
The national independent supervisory authorities referred to in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 (‘supervisory authorities’) should monitor the lawfulness of the processing of personal data by the Member States under this Regulation, including the exchange of supplementary information.
Nadzorni organi bi morali zagotoviti, da se vsaj vsaka štiri leta izvede revizija postopkov obdelave podatkov v nacionalnih sistemih v njihovi državi članici v skladu z mednarodnimi revizijskimi standardi.
The supervisory authorities should be granted sufficient resources to carry out this task.
Revizijo bi morali izvesti nadzorni organi oziroma bi morali nadzorni organi revizijo naročiti neposredno pri neodvisnem revizorju za varstvo podatkov.
The rights of data subjects to access, rectify and erase their personal data that is stored in SIS, and any subsequent remedies before national courts as well as the mutual recognition of judgments should be provided for.
Neodvisni revizor bi moral ostati pod nadzorom in odgovornostjo zadevnih nadzornih organov, ki bi zato morali sami naročiti revizijo in jasno opredeliti namen, področje uporabe in metodologijo za revizijo ter zagotoviti usmerjanje in nadzor revizije ter končnih rezultatov.
It is also appropriate to require annual statistics from Member States.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov bi moral spremljati dejavnosti institucij in organov Unije v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov na podlagi te uredbe.
The supervisory authorities should ensure that an audit of the data processing operations in their Member State's national systems is carried out in accordance with international auditing standards at least every four years.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov in nadzorni organi bi morali medsebojno sodelovati pri spremljanju SIS.