natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
if the opposition is based on a mark with a reputation within the meaning of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, in addition to the evidence referred to in point (a) of this paragraph, evidence showing that the mark has a reputation in the Union or in the Member State concerned for the goods or services indicated in accordance with Article 2(2)(g) of this Regulation, as well as evidence or arguments showing that use without due cause of the trade mark applied for would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.
če ugovor temelji na znamki z ugledom v smislu člena 8(5) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, poleg dokazil iz točke (a) tega odstavka, dokazilo o tem, da znamka v Uniji ali zadevni državi članici uživa ugled glede blaga in storitev, navedenih v skladu s členom 2(2)(g) te uredbe, kakor tudi dokazila ali navedbe, ki kažejo, da bi neupravičena uporaba blagovne znamke, ki se prijavlja, nepošteno izkoriščala ali pa oškodovala razlikovalni značaj ali ugled prejšnje blagovne znamke.
Where the evidence concerning the filing or registration of the earlier rights referred to in paragraph 2(a) or, where applicable, paragraph 2(d) or (e), or the evidence concerning the content of the relevant national law, is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, the opposing party may provide such evidence by making reference to that source.
Če so dokazila o vložitvi ali registraciji prejšnjih pravic iz odstavka 2(a) ali, če je primerno, iz odstavka 2(d) ali (e) ali dokazila glede vsebine zadevne nacionalne zakonodaje dostopna prek spletnega vira, ki ga priznava Urad, lahko stranka, ki nasprotuje, navede taka dokazila s sklicevanjem na ta vir.
Any filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents referred to in paragraph 2(a), (d) or (e), as well as any provisions of the applicable national law governing the acquisition of rights and their scope of protection as referred to in paragraph 2(d) and (e), including evidence accessible online as referred to in paragraph 3, shall be in the language of the proceedings or shall be accompanied by a translation into that language.
Vsako potrdilo o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju oziroma enakovreden dokument iz odstavka 2(a)(d) ali (e), kakor tudi katere koli določbe veljavnega nacionalnega prava, ki ureja pridobivanje pravic in obseg njihovega varstva, kot je navedeno v odstavkih 2(d) in (e), vključno z dokazili, dostopnimi na spletu, kot je navedeno v odstavku 3, so v jeziku postopka ali se predložijo skupaj s prevodom v ta jezik.
The translation shall be submitted by the opposing party of its own motion within the time limit specified for submitting the original document.
Stranka, ki ugovarja, prevod na lastno pobudo predloži v roku, določenem za predložitev izvirnika.
Any other evidence submitted by the opposing party to substantiate the opposition shall be subject to Article 24 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.
Za vsa druga dokazila, ki jih za namene utemeljevanja ugovora predloži stranka, ki ugovarja, velja člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626.
Translations submitted after the expiry of the relevant time limits shall not be taken into account.
Prevodi, predloženi po izteku zadevnega roka, se ne upoštevajo.
The Office shall not take into account written submissions, or parts thereof, which have not been submitted in or not been translated into the language of the proceedings within the time limit set by the Office in accordance with paragraph 1.
Urad ne upošteva pisnih vlog ali njihovih delov, ki niso bili predloženi v jeziku postopka ali ki vanj niso bili prevedeni v roku, ki ga je v skladu z odstavkom 1 določil Urad.
Where, until the expiry of the period referred to in Article 7(1), the opposing party has not provided any evidence, or where the evidence provided is manifestly irrelevant or manifestly insufficient to meet the requirements laid down in Article 7(2) for any of the earlier rights, the opposition shall be rejected as unfounded.
Če stranka, ki ugovarja, do izteka roka iz člena 7(1) ni predložila nobenega dokazila oziroma če so predložena dokazila očitno neustrezna ali ne zadoščajo zahtevam iz člena 7(2) za katero koli prejšnjo pravico, se ugovor zavrže kot neutemeljen.
Where the opposition is not rejected pursuant to paragraph 1, the Office shall communicate the submission of the opposing party to the applicant and shall invite it to file its observations within a period specified by the Office.
Če ugovor na podlagi odstavka 1 ni zavržen, Urad prijavitelja obvesti o vložitvi ugovora in ga pozove, naj vloži svoje pripombe v roku, ki mu ga določi.
Where the applicant submits no observations, the Office shall base its ruling on the opposition on the evidence before it.
Če prijavitelj ne vloži nobenih pripomb, Urad izda odločbo o ugovoru na podlagi razpoložljivih dokazov.
The observations submitted by the applicant shall be communicated to the opposing party who shall be invited, if the Office considers it necessary, to reply within a period specified by the Office.
O pripombah, ki jih vloži prijavitelj, se obvesti stranka, ki ugovarja in ki jo Urad, če se mu tako zdi potrebno, pozove k odgovoru v roku, ki ji ga določi.
Where, after the expiry of the period referred to in Article 7(1), the opposing party submits facts or evidence that supplement relevant facts or evidence provided within that period and that relate to the same requirement laid down in Article 7(2), the Office shall exercise its discretion under Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 in deciding whether to accept these supplementing facts or evidence.
Če po izteku roka iz člena 7(1) stranka, ki ugovarja, predloži dejstva ali dokazila, ki dopolnjujejo zadevna dejstva ali dokazila, predložena znotraj tega roka, in se nanašajo na isto zahtevo iz člena 7(2), Urad v skladu s členom 95(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 pri odločanju, ali naj sprejme ta dopolnilna dejstva in dokazila, uveljavlja svojo diskrecijo.
For that purpose, the Office shall take into account, in particular, the stage of proceedings and whether the facts or evidence are, prima facie, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case and whether there are valid reasons for the late submission of the facts or evidence.
V ta namen Urad upošteva predvsem, v kateri fazi je postopek, ali je verjetno, da bodo dejstva ali dokazila prima facie pomembna za izid zadeve, in ali obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za zamudo pri predložitvi dejstev ali dokazil.
The Office shall invite the applicant to submit further observations in response if it deems it appropriate under the circumstances.
Če se mu to v danih okoliščinah zdi ustrezno, Urad pozove prijavitelja, naj v odgovor predloži nadaljnje pripombe.
Where the opposition has not been rejected pursuant to paragraph 1 and the evidence submitted by the opposing party is not sufficient to substantiate the opposition in accordance with Article 7 for any of the earlier rights, the opposition shall be rejected as unfounded.
Če se ugovor v skladu z odstavkom 1 ne zavrže in dokazila, ki jih predloži stranka, ki ugovarja, v skladu s členom 7 niso zadostna za utemeljitev nasprotovanja za katero koli izmed prejšnjih pravic, se ugovor zavrže kot neutemeljen.
Article 6(2) and (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis after the date on which the adversarial part of the opposition proceedings is deemed to commence.
Člen 6(2) in (3) se po datumu, ki se šteje za začetek kontradiktornega dela postopka z ugovorom, smiselno uporablja.
Where the applicant wishes to withdraw or restrict the contested application, it shall do so by way of a separate document.
Če prijavitelj želi umakniti ali omejiti izpodbijano prijavo, to stori z ločeno vlogo.
In appropriate cases, the Office may invite the parties to limit their observations to particular issues, in which case it shall allow them to raise the other issues at a later stage of the proceedings.
V ustreznih primerih lahko Urad pozove stranke, naj omejijo svoje pripombe na posamezna vprašanja, vendar strankam dovoli, da postavijo druga vprašanja v poznejši fazi postopka.
The Office shall not be required to inform a party of the possibility of producing certain relevant facts or evidence which that party previously failed to produce.
Od Urada se ne zahteva, da stranko obvesti o možnosti predložitve določenih relevantnih dejstev ali dokazil, ki jih ta stranka prej ni predložila.
Multiple oppositions
Več ugovorov
Where a number of oppositions have been entered in respect of the same application for the registration of an EU trade mark, the Office may examine them in one set of proceedings.
Če se je v zvezi z isto prijavo za registracijo blagovne znamke EU vložilo večje število ugovorov, jih Urad lahko preveri v enem samem postopku.
The Office may subsequently decide to examine those oppositions separately.
Urad se lahko kasneje odloči, da te ugovore preveri ločeno.
Where a preliminary examination of one or more oppositions reveals that the EU trade mark for which an application for registration has been filed may be ineligible for registration in respect of some or all of the goods or services for which registration is sought, the Office may suspend the other opposition proceedings relating to that application.
Če se s predhodnim preverjanjem enega ali več ugovorov odkrije, da je blagovna znamka EU, za katero se je vložila prijava za registracijo, v zvezi z nekaterim ali vsem blagom oziroma storitvami, ki jih prijava zadeva, lahko neupravičena do registracije, Urad lahko prekine druge postopke z ugovorom, povezane s to prijavo.
The Office shall inform the opposing parties affected by the suspension of any relevant decisions taken in the context of those proceedings which are ongoing.
Urad obvesti stranke, ki ugovarjajo in na katere je prekinitev vplivala, o vseh pomembnih odločitvah, sprejetih v okviru teh postopkov, ki so v teku.
Once a decision rejecting an application as referred to in paragraph 1 has become final, the oppositions for which proceedings have been suspended in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be deemed to have been disposed of and the opposing parties concerned shall be informed accordingly.
Ko odločba o zavrnitvi prijave iz odstavka 1 postane dokončna, se ugovori, za katere so bili v skladu z odstavkom 2 postopki prekinjeni, štejejo za rešene, stranke, ki ugovarjajo, pa se o tem obvesti.
Such a disposition shall be considered to constitute a case which has not proceeded to judgment within the meaning of Article 109(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
V smislu člena 109(5) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 se s tovrstnim končanjem razume, da se postopek ni nadaljeval na sodišču.
The Office shall refund 50 % of the opposition fee paid by each opposing party whose opposition is deemed to have been disposed of in accordance with paragraph 3, provided that the suspension of the proceedings relating to that opposition took place before the commencement of the adversarial part of the proceedings.
Urad povrne 50 % pristojbine za ugovor vsaki stranki, ki ugovarja, če se njen ugovor v skladu z odstavkom 3 šteje za rešenega, pod pogojem, da se je postopek v zvezi s tem ugovorom prekinil pred pričetkom kontradiktornega dela postopka.
A request for proof of use of an earlier mark pursuant to Article 47(2) or (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall be admissible if it is submitted as an unconditional request in a separate document within the period specified by the Office pursuant to Article 8(2) of this Regulation.
Zahteva za dokaz o uporabi prejšnje blagovne znamke je v skladu s členom 47(2) ali (3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 dopustna, če je predložena kot brezpogojna zahteva v ločeni vlogi v roku, ki ga v skladu s členom 8(2) te uredbe določi Urad.
Where the applicant has made a request for proof of use of an earlier mark which complies with the requirements of Article 47(2) or (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Office shall invite the opposing party to provide the proof required within a time limit specified by the Office.
Če je prijavitelj v skladu s členom 47(2) ali (3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 zahteval dokaz o uporabi prejšnje znamke, Urad pozove stranko, ki ugovarja, naj predloži zadevne dokaze, in določi rok, v katerem naj to stori.
Where the opposing party does not provide any evidence or reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or where the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly irrelevant or manifestly insufficient, the Office shall reject the opposition in so far as it is based on that earlier mark.
Če stranka, ki ugovarja, pred iztekom roka ne predloži nobenih dokazil ali razlogov za neuporabo oziroma so predložena dokazila oziroma razlogi očitno neustrezni ali nezadostni, Urad zavrže ugovor v delu, ki zadeva to prejšnjo znamko.
The indications and evidence of use shall establish the place, time, extent and nature of use of the opposing trade mark for the goods or services in respect of which it is registered and on which the opposition is based.
Na podlagi podatkov in dokazil o uporabi se ugotovi kraj, čas, obseg in narava uporabe blagovne znamke, na kateri temelji ugovor, za blago in storitve, za katere je registrirana.
The evidence referred to in paragraph 3 shall be filed in accordance with Article 55(2) and Articles 63 and 64 and shall be limited to the submission of supporting documents and items such as packages, labels, price lists, catalogues, invoices, photographs, newspaper advertisements, and statements in writing as referred to in Article 97(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Dokazila iz odstavka 3 se vložijo v skladu s členom 55(2) ter členoma 63 in 64 ter so omejena na dodatno dokumentacijo in predmete, kot so embalaže, nalepke, ceniki, katalogi, računi, fotografije, časopisni oglasi in pisne izjave iz člena 97(1)(f) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001.
A request for proof of use may be filed at the same time as observations on the grounds on which the opposition is based.
Zahteva za dokaz o uporabi se lahko vloži skupaj s pripombami o razlogih, na katerih temelji ugovor.
Such observations may also be filed together with the observations in reply to the proof of use.
Te pripombe se lahko vložijo skupaj s pripombami v odgovor na dokaz o uporabi.
Where the evidence supplied by the opposing party is not in the language of the opposition proceedings, the Office may require the opposing party to submit a translation of that evidence in that language pursuant to Article 24 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.
Če dokazila stranke, ki ugovarja, niso v jeziku postopka z ugovorom, lahko Urad od stranke, ki ugovarja, zahteva, naj v skladu s členom 24 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626 predloži prevod teh dokazil v jezik postopka.
Where after the expiry of the time limit referred to in paragraph 2, the opposing party submits indications or evidence that supplement relevant indications or evidence already submitted before expiry of that time limit and relate to the same requirement laid down in paragraph 3, the Office shall exercise its discretion under Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 in deciding whether to accept those supplementary indications or evidence.
Če po izteku roka iz odstavka 2 stranka, ki ugovarja, predloži podatke ali dokazila, ki dopolnjujejo zadevne podatke ali dokazila, predložene znotraj tega roka, in se nanašajo na isto zahtevo iz odstavka 3, Urad v skladu s členom 95(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 pri odločanju, ali naj sprejme navedene dopolnilne podatke in dokazila, uveljavlja svojo diskrecijo.
For that purpose, the Office shall take into account, in particular, the stage of proceedings and whether the indications or evidence are, prima facie, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case and whether there are valid reasons for the late submission of the indications or evidence.
V ta namen Urad upošteva predvsem, v kateri fazi je postopek, ali je verjetno, da bodo dejstva ali dokazila prima facie pomembna za izid zadeve in ali obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za zamudo pri predložitvi dokazil.
TITLE III
NASLOV III
AMENDMENT OF THE APPLICATION
SPREMEMBA PRIJAVE
A request for amendment of an application pursuant to Article 49(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall contain:
Zahteva za spremembo prijave v skladu s členom 49(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 vsebuje:
the name and address of the applicant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;
ime in naslov prijavitelja v skladu s členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626;
an indication of the element of the application to be amended, and that element in its amended version;
navedbo elementa prijave, ki naj se spremeni, in ta element v spremenjeni verziji;
where the amendment relates to the representation of the mark, a representation of the mark as amended, in accordance with Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.
če je sprememba povezana s prikazom znamke, prikaz znamke v spremenjeni obliki v skladu s členom 3 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626.
Where the requirements for the amendment of the application are not fulfilled, the Office shall communicate the deficiency to the applicant and shall specify a time limit for remedying the deficiency.
Če pogoji za spremembo prijave niso izpolnjeni, Urad prijavitelju sporoči pomanjkljivosti in določi rok, v katerem naj jih odpravi.
Where the applicant does not remedy the deficiency within the specified time limit, the Office shall reject the request for amendment.
Če prijavitelj pomanjkljivosti ne odpravi v določenem roku, Urad zahtevo za spremembo zavrže.
Where the amended trade mark application is published pursuant to Article 49(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, Articles 2 to 10 of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Če je spremenjena prijava v skladu s členom 49(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 objavljena, se členi 2 do 10 te Uredbe smiselno uporabljajo.
A single request for amendment may be made for the amendment of the same element in two or more applications by the same applicant.
Za spremembo istega elementa pri dveh ali več prijavah istega prijavitelja se lahko vloži le ena zahteva za spremembo.
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 shall apply mutatis mutandis for applications to correct the name or the business address of a representative appointed by the applicant.
Odstavki 1, 2 in 4 se smiselno uporabljajo pri prijavah, kjer se popravi ime ali službeni naslov zastopnika, ki ga imenuje prijavitelj.
TITLE IV
NASLOV IV
REVOCATION AND INVALIDITY OR ASSIGNMENT
RAZVELJAVITEV IN NIČNOST ALI PRENOS
An application to the Office for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity pursuant to Article 63 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall contain:
Zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti, ki se naslovi na Urad, v skladu s členom 63 Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 vsebuje:
the registration number of the EU trade mark in respect of which revocation or a declaration of invalidity is sought and the name of its proprietor;
registracijsko številko blagovne znamke EU, za katero se je vložila zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti, in ime njenega imetnika;
the grounds on which the application is based by means of a statement that the respective requirements laid down in Articles 58, 59, 60, 81, 82, 91 or 92 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 are fulfilled;
razloge, na katerih temelji vloga, in sicer v obliki izjave, da so izpolnjeni pogoji, določeni v členih 58, 59, 60, 81, 82, 91 ali 92 Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001;
as concerns the applicant:
v zvezi z vložnikom zahteve:
the identification of the applicant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;
navedbo vložnika v skladu s členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626;
where the applicant has appointed a representative or where representation is mandatory within the meaning of Article 119(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the name and business address of the representative, in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;
če je vložnik imenoval zastopnika oziroma če je zastopništvo v smislu člena 119(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 obvezno, ime in službeni naslov zastopnika v skladu s členom 2(1)(e) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626;
an indication of the goods or services in respect of which revocation or a declaration of invalidity is sought, in the absence of which the application shall be deemed to be directed against all the goods or services covered by the contested EU trade mark.
navedbo blaga ali storitev, za katere se je vložila zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti, brez katere se šteje, da je prijava naperjena zoper vse blago ali storitve, ki jih izpodbijana blagovna znamka EU zajema.
In addition to the requirements laid down in paragraph 1, an application for a declaration of invalidity based on relative grounds shall contain the following:
Zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti, ki temelji na relativnih razlogih, poleg pogojev iz odstavka 1 vsebuje še:
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 60(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, an identification of the earlier right on which the application is based, in accordance with Article 2(2)(b) of this Regulation, which shall apply mutatis mutandis to such an application;
v primeru zahteve na podlagi člena 60(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 navedbo prejšnje pravice, na kateri zahteva temelji, v skladu s členom 2(2)(b) te uredbe, ki se za tovrstno zahtevo smiselno uporablja;
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 60(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, an indication of the nature of the earlier right on which the application is based, its representation and an indication of whether this earlier right exists in the whole of the Union or in one or more Member States, and if so, an indication of those Member States;
v primeru zahteve na podlagi člena 60(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 navedbo narave prejšnje pravice, na kateri zahteva temelji, njen prikaz ter navedbo, ali ta prejšnja pravica obstaja v celotni Uniji ali v eni ali več državah članicah, in če je tako, navedbo teh držav članic;
particulars pursuant to Article 2(2)(d) to (g) of this Regulation, which apply mutatis mutandis to such an application;
podrobnosti na podlagi člena 2(2)(d) do (g) te uredbe, ki se za tovrstno prijavo smiselno uporablja;
where the application is entered by a licensee or by a person who is entitled under the relevant Union legislation or national law to exercise an earlier right, an indication concerning the authorisation or entitlement to file the application.
če je zahtevo vložil pridobitelj licence ali oseba, ki je v skladu z zadevno zakonodajo Unije ali nacionalnim pravom upravičena uveljavljati prejšnjo pravico, navedbo o pooblastilu ali upravičenosti do vložitve zahteve.
Where the application for a declaration of invalidity pursuant to Article 60 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 is based on more than one earlier mark or earlier right, paragraphs 1(b) and 2 of this Article shall apply for each of those marks or rights.
Če zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti na podlagi člena 60 Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 temelji na več kot eni prejšnji znamki ali prejšnji pravici, se za vsako od teh znamk ali pravic uporabljata odstavka 1(b) in 2 tega člena.
The application may contain a reasoned statement on the grounds setting out the facts and arguments on which it is based and supporting evidence.
Zahteva lahko vsebuje utemeljeno izjavo z vzroki, kjer so izpostavljena dejstva in navedbe, na katerih temelji, ter dodatna dokazila.
Languages used in revocation or invalidity proceedings
Jeziki, ki se uporabljajo v postopku za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti
The applicant for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity or the proprietor of the EU trade mark may inform the Office before the expiry of a period of two months of receipt by the EU trade mark proprietor of the communication referred to in Article 17(1), that a different language of proceedings has been agreed pursuant to Article 146(8) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Vložnik zahteve za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti ali imetnik blagovne znamke EU lahko pred iztekom roka dveh mesecev po imetnikovem prejemu sporočila iz člena 17(1) obvesti Urad, da je bil v skladu s členom 146(8) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 dosežen dogovor o drugem jeziku postopka.