natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following final disclosure, the China National Tire Group claimed its rights of defence have been breached by the Commission when it rejected its request for further extension of the deadline provided for submission of comments on the final disclosure.
Poleg tega bi morala pri določanju roka upoštevati posebnosti obravnavane zadeve ter zagotoviti dovolj časa za pisne in ustne pripombe.
According to it, the Commission should not view the ten-day period as a fixed time limit.
V zvezi s temi trditvami je Komisija navedla, da je v zvezi s pripombami o dokončnem razkritju v celoti spoštovala najkrajši rok 10 dni, določen v členu 30(5) osnovne uredbe.
Furthermore, when setting out the deadline, the Commission should consider the peculiarities of the case at hand and allow sufficient time for both written and oral submissions.
Poleg tega je tudi odobrila podaljšanje vsem zainteresiranim stranem v postopku, ki so zaprosile zanj, pri čemer je upoštevala nujnost zadeve v skladu z istim členom.
In respect of these claims, the Commission noted that it had fully complied with the minimum deadline of 10 days set in Article 30(5) of the basic Regulation for comments on final disclosure.
Družba Hämmerling je zahtevala zaslišanje pri pooblaščencu za zaslišanje, da bi izrazila pomisleke v zvezi s sedanjo preiskavo in nekaterimi horizontalnimi vprašanji glede varstva zaupnih in nezaupnih informacij, vključenih v podatkovno zbirko TRON TDI, ter sedanje prakse odobritve dostopa do nezaupnih spisov zainteresiranim stranem zunaj ozemlja Unije prek navedene podatkovne zbirke.
Furthermore, it also granted an extension to all interested parties in the proceeding who requested so taking into account the urgency of the matter in accordance with the same Article.
Komisija je navedla, da za institucije EU ni zavezujoča splošna uredba o varstvu podatkov, ampak Uredba št. 45/2001.
Hämmerling requested a hearing with the Hearing Officer to raise legal concerns related to the current investigation and certain horizontal issues concerning data protection of confidential and non-confidential information as included in the TRON TDI database and the current practice of granting access to the non-confidential files to interested parties outside the territory of the Union through that database.
Poleg tega je družba Hämmerling potrdila, da vprašanje varstva osebnih podatkov ni neposredno povezano z morebitnim specifičnim oviranjem njenih pravic do obrambe na podlagi zakonodaje o trgovinski zaščiti.
The Commission observed that the EU institutions are not legally bound by the General Data Protection Regulation but by Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da ni bilo neposrednega vpliva na položaj družbe Hämmerling kot zainteresirane strani v postopku in njene pravice do obrambe.
Moreover, Hämmerling confirmed that the personal data protection issue was not directly linked to a possible specific hampering of its rights of defence under trade defence law.
Družba Hämmerling je po dokončnem razkritju ponovila svojo trditev, da „je pravica do varstva osebnih podatkov neodvisna pravica, pri kateri prag za njeno kršitev ne zahteva dejanskega primera, ampak le možnost njene zlorabe na neprimeren način, kot na primer, če je dana na voljo nepreverjenim uporabnikom podatkovne zbirke v tretjih državah, brez ustrezne ocene njihovega spoštovanja zakonodaje o varstvu podatkov“.
The Commission therefore concluded that Hämmerling's status as interested party in the proceeding and its rights of defence were not directly affected.
V zvezi s to trditvijo se je Komisija sklicevala na člen 9(6) Uredbe št. 45/2001, ki določa, da lahko Komisija prenese osebne podatke, če je prenos potreben ali pravno obvezen zaradi obrambe pravnih zahtevkov, in na dejstvo, da morajo vsi posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, potem ko jim zainteresirana stran odobri dostop do zadeve, ob prvi prijavi v spletno platformo TRON podpisati pogoje uporabe spletne platforme (v katerih je med drugim določeno, da spletna platforma TRON ne sme izdajati informacij brez dovoljenja).
After final disclosure, Hämmerling reiterated its claim that ‘the right to personal data protection is an independent right, where threshold for its violation does not require an actual example, but the mere possibility of being misused in inappropriate manner, such as making it available to unverified users of database in third-countries with no adequate assessment of their observance of data protection law’.
Zato se šteje, da je uporaba spletne platforme TRON skladna z veljavnimi pravili o varstvu podatkov.
In relation to this claim, the Commission referred to Article 9(6) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 that allows the Commission to transfer personal data if the transfer is necessary or legally required for the defence of legal claims, and the fact that all data subjects have to sign the TRON terms of use (that stipulates amongst other that there can be no unauthorized release of any information from TRON) when entering into TRON for the first time when they were granted interested party access to a case.
Po dokončnem razkritju je skupina Giti Group zahtevala zaslišanje pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje, pri čemer je trdila, da je Komisija kršila njene pravice do obrambe, ker je shemo za povračilo dajatev vključila zelo pozno v postopku in sprejela napačne sklepe.
It considered therefore that the use of TRON is compliant with the applicable data protection rules.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje je menil, da je obvestilo o začetku dovoljevalo vključitev obravnavane sheme.
Following final disclosure the Giti Group requested a hearing with Hearing Officer claiming that its rights of defence have been breached by the Commission as it included the duty drawback scheme very late in the proceeding and it arrived to wrong conclusions.
Poleg tega bi se morala skupina Giti Group zavedati, da je ta shema zajeta v postopku in da je imela dovolj časa za predložitev svojih pripomb Komisiji.
The Hearing Officer took the view that the Notice of Initiation allowed for covering the scheme under discussion.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje je sklenil, da so bile pravice skupine Giti Group do obrambe spoštovane.
Furthermore, the Giti Group should have been aware that this scheme is covered by the proceeding and had sufficient time to present all their comments to the Commission.
Več drugih zainteresiranih strani je ponovilo enake pomisleke, kot so bili izraženi po razkritju informativnega dokumenta, in prosilo Komisijo za dodatna pojasnila.
The Hearing Officer concluded that the rights of defence of the Giti Group were respected.
Komisija je menila, da javna dokumentacija, informativni dokument in dokončno razkritje vsebujejo dovolj informacij, da lahko vse zainteresirane strani v celoti uveljavljajo svoje pravice do obrambe.
Several other interested parties reiterated the same concerns as expressed after the information document and asked the Commission to make further clarifications.
Poleg tega je bilo v javno dokumentacijo pred dokončnim razkritjem vključeno obvestilo v zvezi z dokumentacijo s pojasnili o informativnem dokumentu.
The Commission considered that the open file, the Information Document and the Final Disclosure contained sufficient information allowing all interested parties to fully exercise their rights of defence.
Zato je zavrnila zahtevo za dodatna pojasnila.
Moreover, a note for the file providing clarifications on the Information Document was included in the open file before final disclosure.
Na koncu so strani trdile, da so bile njihove pravice do obrambe močno prizadete, saj je bilo obdobje za predložitev pripomb o dokončnem razkritju prekratko, kljub podaljšanju, in niso bile upoštevane posebnosti te preiskave.
It therefore rejected the request to provide further clarifications.
Z zvezi z določenim rokom je Komisija ponovila, da je upoštevala zakonski rok iz člena 30(5) osnovne uredbe, kot je podrobneje pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 65.
Finally, the parties claimed that their rights of defence were seriously affected as the period for commenting on the final disclosure was too short even with the extension and did not take into consideration the peculiarities of this investigation.
Dodala je, da so strani prejele obsežno razkritje, in sicer z informativnim dokumentom iz julija 2018, ki je že vseboval glavne pomisleke ter sklepe za vse subvencije z izjemo presežnega odpusta naravnega kavčuka in električne energije, zagotovljenih za plačilo, nižje od primernega.
Regarding the set deadline the Commission reiterated that it had complied with the legal deadline under Article 30(5) of the basic Regulation, as further explained in recital (65) above.
V tej fazi je bil stranem odobren 25-dnevni rok za predložitev pripomb.
It added that the parties had received an extensive disclosure by means of the Information Document in July 2018 which already set out the main considerations and conclusions for all subsidies with the exception of excess remission of natural rubber and electricity provided for less than adequate remuneration.
Ker so bile tako vse strani seznanjene z večino zadev, so bile pripombe, prejete po dokončnem razkritju, tudi utemeljene, pri čemer so obsegale od 8 do 63 strani.
At that stage parties were granted a deadline of 25 days to submit comments.
Kar zadeva vidik škode v tej preiskavi, je Komisija ugotovila, da so strani prejele dokončno razkritje in dodaten dokument o dokončnem razkritju tudi v okviru vzporedne protidampinške preiskave.
As most of the issues were therefore known to all parties, the comments received upon final disclosure were also substantial, ranging from 8 to 63 pages.
V sedanji preiskavi so se obravnavale pripombe, prejete po obeh razkritjih.
With respect to the injury aspect of this investigation, the Commission noted that parties received a final disclosure and an additional final disclosure document also in the context of the parallel anti-dumping investigation.
Zato je Komisija menila, da že javna dokumentacija in razkritja vsebujejo dovolj informacij, da lahko vse zainteresirane strani v celoti uveljavljajo svoje pravice do obrambe v roku, določenem v dokumentu o dokončnem razkritju.
The present investigation addressed the comments received following the two disclosures.
Iz teh razlogov je Komisija menila, da so bile pravice vseh zainteresiranih strani do obrambe v tem postopku v celoti upoštevane.
Therefore, the Commission considered that the open file and the disclosures already contained sufficient information allowing all interested parties to fully exercise their rights of defence within the deadline as set out in the definitive disclosure document.
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
For these reasons, the Commission took the view that the rights of defence of all interested parties were fully observed during this proceeding.
Zadevni izdelek
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Zadevni izdelek so nekatere nove ali protektirane pnevmatike iz gume, ki se uporabljajo za avtobuse ali tovornjake, z indeksom obremenitve nad 121, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN 40112090 in ex40121200 (oznaka TARIC 4012120010).
Product concerned
Te oznake KN in TARIC so zgolj informativne.
The product concerned is certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN codes 40112090 and ex40121200 (TARIC code 4012120010).
Zadevni izdelek zajema nove in protektirane pnevmatike za avtobuse ali tovornjake, ki imajo enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti.
These CN and TARIC codes are given for information only.
Obe vrsti zadevnega izdelka sta izdelani iz istih surovin (čeprav se uporabljena tehnologija lahko razlikuje) in imata podobno strukturo.
The product concerned covers both new and retreaded pneumatic tyres for buses or lorries which share the same essential physical, chemical and technical characteristics.
Posledica razlike v surovinah in strukturi so različne značilnosti glede zmogljivosti.
Both types of the product concerned are made of the same input (even if the technology involved may differ) and have a similar structure.
Proizvodni postopek
The variance in raw materials and structure impart different performance characteristics.
Nove pnevmatike
Manufacturing process
Postopek izdelave novih pnevmatik za tovornjake in avtobuse zajema: (1) sestavljanje, pripravo in mešanje kavčukovih zmesi, 2) pripravo sestavnih delov pnevmatike, 3) (okolju prijazno) izdelovanje pnevmatike, 4) vulkanizacijo in 5) končni pregled.
New tyres
Vse pnevmatike za tovornjake in avtobuse so izdelane iz istih surovin, in sicer iz naravnega kavčuka, sintetičnega kavčuka, jekla, ogljenih saj, drugih kemikalij in olj ter tekstila, ter imajo enake sestavne dele, in sicer tekalno plast, bočnico, notranjo karkaso, trak za nogo, jeklene žice in kord karkase pnevmatike, čeprav med različnimi proizvajalci tega izdelka obstajajo nekatere razlike.
The manufacturing process of the new lorry and bus tyres involves: (1) compounding and mixing rubber; (2) tyre components preparation; (3) (green) tyre building; (4) curing (vulcanisation); and (5) final inspection.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da se pri postopkih izdelave novih pnevmatik za tovornjake in avtobuse uporabljajo različne tehnologije, ki pa niso vplivale na splošno ugotovitev o zamenljivosti.
All lorry and bus tyres are made from the same basic raw materials, namely natural rubber, synthetic rubber, steel, carbon black, other chemicals and oils as well as fabric and have the same components, namely tread belt, sidewall, inner casing, bead wires, steel belts, casing cords, even if a certain variance is found between the various producers of this product.
Protektirane pnevmatike
The manufacturing process of the new lorry and bus tyres was also found to involve varying technologies, which, however, did not impact on the overall findings of interchangeability.
Protektiranje je v bistvu postopek recikliranja, s katerim se izrabljene pnevmatike obnovijo z zamenjavo tekalne plasti na stari karkasi.
Retreaded tyres
Karkase so glavni elementi postopka protektiranja, zato je ključni del dejavnosti izvajalca protektiranja izbira in nabava karkas, primernih za protektiranje.
Retreading is essentially a recycling process whereby worn tyres are refurbished through a replacement of the tread on an old casing.
Karkase so zato glavna surovina proizvodnega postopka in predstavljajo, odvisno od kakovosti, bodisi dejanski polizdelek bodisi odpadek.
Casings are main elements of the retreading process, and, as such a substantial part of the retreader activity is the selection and acquisition of casings suitable for retreading.
Ta postopek lahko vključuje različne tehnologije, ki ne vplivajo na ugotovitve Komisije glede zamenljivosti.
Casings are thereby the main input of the production process and constitute — depending of their quality — either a real ‘semi-finished’ product or a waste.
Uporabe in vrste pnevmatik
Again, this process can involve varying technologies without impact on the Commission's interchangeability findings.
Proizvaja se veliko različnih vrst in velikosti pnevmatik za tovornjake in avtobuse, ki se uporabljajo za najrazličnejša gospodarska vozila, od tovornjakov za lokalno dostavo in avtobusov v mestih ali regionalnih okoljih do tovornjakov in avtobusov za vožnjo na dolge razdalje glede na njihovo velikost in specifikacije indeksa nosilnosti.
Uses and types of tyres
Niso primerne za uporabo na osebnih vozilih ali drugih lahkih gospodarskih vozilih niti za popolnoma terenska vozila, kot so kmetijski traktorji.
Lorry and bus tyres are produced in a large variety of types and sizes found on a wide range of commercial vehicles, from local delivery lorries and buses in urban or regional settings to the long haul lorries and buses according to their size and load index specifications.
Prodajajo se dve vrsti in štiri kategorije pnevmatik za tovornjake ali avtobuse.
They are neither suitable for use on passenger vehicles or on other light commercial vehicles nor for fully off-the-road vehicles such as agricultural tractors.
Vrsta pnevmatik z zračnico je bolj klasična možnost; ima notranjo zračnico z lastnim ventilom in je nameščena v pnevmatiko.
Tyres for lorries or buses are sold in two types and four categories.
Pri pnevmatiki brez zračnice pnevmatika in platišče kolesa tvorita nepredušno zaporo, ventil pa je pritrjen neposredno na platišče.
Tube type tyre is a more traditional option; it has an inner tube, which has its own valve, placed inside the tyre.
Velika večina pnevmatik za tovornjake ali avtobuse, prodanih v Uniji, so pnevmatike brez zračnice.
In a tubeless tire, the tire and the rim of the wheel form an airtight seal, with the valve being directly mounted on the rim.
Štiri kategorije pnevmatik za tovornjake ali avtobuse so: za krmiljeno os, za pogonsko os, za os priklopnega vozila in za vse položaje.
An overwhelming majority of tyres for lorries or buses sold in the Union are tubeless tyres.
Pnevmatike za krmiljeno os so zasnovane za uporabo na sprednji osi za pomoč pri krmiljenju, lahko pa se uporabljajo na vseh položajih na tovornjakih ali avtobusih, odvisno od uporabe vozila.
The four categories of tyres for lorries or buses are: steer, drive, trailer and multi-position.
Pnevmatike za pogonsko os so zasnovane za pogonski sklop in zagotavljajo boljši vlek.
Steer tyres are designed to be used on the front axle to aid with steering, but can be used in all positions on the lorries or bus depending on the vehicle's use.
Pnevmatike za os priklopnega vozila so zasnovane za namestitev na priklopna vozila, medtem ko so pnevmatike za vse položaje zasnovane za uporabo v vseh položajih na vozilu, odvisno od njegove uporabe.
Drive tyres are designed for the drive train and provide better traction.
Za pnevmatike, nove ali protektirane, veljajo enake varnostne zahteve na trgu Unije, kot je določeno v Direktivi 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Trailer tyres are designed to be mounted on trailers, while multi- position tyres are designed to be used in all in all positions on a vehicle depending on its use.
Segmentacija na tri razrede trga Unije za pnevmatike
Tyres, new or retreaded, are subject to the same safety requirements in the Union market as set out in Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Informacije, ki jih je zbrala in prejela Komisija, kažejo, da je trg Unije za pnevmatike za avtobuse in tovornjake razdeljen v tri razrede ali segmente.
Segmentation into three tiers of the Union market for tyres
Čeprav med razredi ni jasnih ločnic, se zainteresirane strani in Komisija v svojih ugotovitvah na splošno strinjajo o naslednji kategorizaciji.
Information collected and received by the Commission indicates that the Union market for bus and lorry tyres is segmented in three tiers or segments.
Prvi razred zajema nove premium pnevmatike vodilnih znamk glavnih proizvajalcev.
While there are no clear dividing lines among tiers, there is a general agreement among interested parties and the findings of the Commission on the following categorisation.
Prepoznavnost znamke je ključni dejavnik za pnevmatike tega razreda in utemeljuje znatno višje cene za pričakovano visoke zmogljivosti in še posebej velike tržne naložbe.
Tier 1 tyres cover premium new tyres with the flagship brand of main manufacturers.
Ta razred zajema predvsem pnevmatike za originalno opremo proizvajalcev tovornjakov ali avtobusov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: OE1).
Brand recognition is a key factor for tyres in this tier and justifies significantly higher prices for expected high performances as well particularly strong marketing investments.
Kakovost pnevmatik prvega razreda zagotavlja visoko raven možnosti protektiranja pnevmatik, ki so zasnovane tako, da so pnevmatike „z več življenjskimi cikli“, s čimer se dodatno poveča znatno višje število prevoženih kilometrov originalnega izdelka (do trikratno protektiranje za običajno uporabo).
Original equipment for lorries or buses manufacturers (‘OE1’) tyres are primarily included in that tier.
Pnevmatike prvega razreda so povezane tudi z višjo stopnjo varnosti in jih pogosto spremlja dobra raven poprodajnih storitev.
The quality of tier 1 tyres ensures a high level of retreadability of the tyres which are designed to be ‘multi-life’ tyres further increasing the significantly higher mileage of the original product (up to three retreading for a normal use).
Drugi razred zajema večino ne-premium pnevmatik, novih in protektiranih, katerih cene se gibljejo med približno 65 % in 80 % cene pnevmatik prvega razreda.
Tier 1 tyres are also associated with a higher level of safety and are often accompanied with a good level of after-sale services.
Ta razred lahko zajema pnevmatike za originalno opremo proizvajalcev priklopnih vozil (v nadaljnjem besedilu: OE2).
Tier 2 tyres cover most non-premium tyres, both new and retreaded tyres, with prices ranging between approximately 65 % and 80 % of the price of tier 1 tyres.
Prepoznavnost znamke je v tem razredu še vedno pomembna, kupci pa znamke običajno dobro poznajo ter lahko opredelijo tudi proizvajalce pnevmatik.
Original equipment for trailers manufacturers (‘OE2’) tyres may be included in that tier.
Na splošno jih je mogoče protektirati vsaj enkrat in imajo dobre zmogljivosti v smislu števila prevoženih kilometrov, čeprav so ti bolj omejeni kot pri pnevmatikah prvega razreda.
Brand recognition remains important in this tier and brands are usually well-known from purchasers which are also able to identify the tyre manufacturers.
Med pnevmatike tretjega razreda spadajo tako nove kot protektirane pnevmatike z manjšo zmogljivostjo glede števila prevoženih kilometrov in zelo omejeno možnostjo protektiranja ali celo brez te možnosti.
They are generally retreadable at least once and, although more limited than tier 1 tyres, deliver good performances in terms of mileage.
Njihova cena običajno znaša manj kot 65 % cene pnevmatik prvega razreda, kar velja tudi za njihovo zmogljivost glede števila prevoženih kilometrov.
Tier 3 tyres cover both new and retreaded tyres with lower mileage performances and very limited retreadability, if any.
V tem razredu prepoznavnost znamke skoraj ne obstaja in cena postane odločilni dejavnik pri odločitvi potrošnika za nakup.
They are typically priced at less than 65 % of the price and mileage performance of tier 1 tyres.
Poprodajne storitve običajno niso zagotovljene.
In that tier, brand recognition is almost non-existent and price becomes the determining factor in the customer's decision to purchase.
Protektirane pnevmatike se lahko razvrstijo v drugi ali tretji razred.
They are usually not provided with after-sale services.
Čeprav je nekatere kitajske pnevmatike mogoče protektirati, se protektiranje na Kitajskem zelo redko izvaja.
Retreaded tyres can be classified under tier 2 or tier 3.
Nasprotno pa je protektiranje precej široko razširjeno v Uniji in na drugih trgih, na primer v Braziliji.
While some Chinese tyres are retreadable, there is very little retreading performed in China.
Dejavnost protektiranja v Uniji zajema:
Retreading is, however, quite widespread in the Union and in other markets, for example in Brazil.
integrirane izvajalce protektiranja, ki delujejo pod imenom ali blagovno znamko proizvajalca novih pnevmatik ali v okviru njegovega pooblastila.
The retreading activity in the Union consists of:
Štejejo se za nadaljnjo stopnjo blagovnih znamk, pod katerimi se prodajajo nove pnevmatike.
integrated retreaders acting under the name, brand or mandate of a producer of new tyres.
To ustreza pnevmatikam drugega razreda,
They are seen as the continuation of the brands selling the new tyres.
neodvisne izvajalce protektiranja, ki običajno pokrivajo veliko manjše geografske trge in količine.
This corresponds to tier 2 tyres,
Pnevmatike prodajajo pod lastnim imenom ali lastno blagovno znamko in se zanašajo na lastno strokovno znanje.
independent retreaders which usually cover much smaller geographical markets and volumes.
Večinoma so to MSP (najmanj 380 družb v Uniji).
They sell tyres under their own name or brand and rely on their own expertise.
To ustreza pnevmatikam tretjega razreda.