natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
NCAs should have sufficient resources, in terms of qualified staff able to conduct proficient legal and economic assessments, financial means, technical and technological expertise and equipment including adequate information technology tools, to ensure they are able to perform their tasks effectively when applying Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
Neodvisnost NOK bi bilo treba okrepiti tako, da bi se jim omogočilo neodvisno odločanje o porabi proračunskih sredstev za namen izvajanja njihovih dolžnosti, in sicer brez poseganja v nacionalna proračunska pravila in postopke.
In the event that the duties and powers of NCAs under national law are extended, Member States should ensure that NCAs have sufficient resources to perform those tasks effectively.
Za zagotovitev, da imajo nacionalni upravni organi, pristojni za konkurenco, potrebne vire za opravljanje svojih nalog, bi se lahko preučilo možnost različnih načinih financiranja, kot je financiranje iz drugih virov, ki niso državni proračun.
The independence of NCAs should be enhanced by enabling them to decide independently on the spending of the budget allocations for the purpose of carrying out their duties, without prejudice to national budgetary rules and procedures.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito spremljanje izvajanja te direktive, bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da nacionalni upravni organi, pristojni za konkurenco, vladnemu ali parlamentarnemu organu posredujejo redna poročila o svojih dejavnostih in virih.
To ensure that national administrative competition authorities have the necessary resources to perform their tasks, different means of financing might be considered, such as financing from alternative sources other than the state budget.
Ta poročila bi morala vključevati informacije o imenovanjih in razrešitvah članov organa odločanja, znesku sredstev, dodeljenih v zadevnem letu, in vseh spremembah tega zneska glede na prejšnja leta.
In order to ensure effective monitoring of the implementation of this Directive, Member States should ensure that national administrative competition authorities submit periodic reports on their activities and resources to a governmental or parliamentary body.
Taka poročila bi morala biti javno dostopna.
Those reports should include information about the appointments and dismissals of members of the decision-making body, the amount of resources that were allocated in the relevant year and any changes in that amount compared to previous years.
NOK potrebujejo minimalni nabor skupnih pooblastil za preiskovanje in odločanje, da bi lahko učinkovito uveljavljali člena 101 in 102 PDEU.
Such reports should be made publicly available.
Nacionalni upravni organi, pristojni za konkurenco, bi morali imeli učinkovita preiskovalna pooblastila za odkrivanje vsakega sporazuma, sklepa ali usklajenega ravnanja, ki je prepovedan na podlagi člena 101 PDEU, ali vsake zlorabe prevladujočega položaja, ki je prepovedana na podlagi člena 102 PDEU, v kateri koli fazi postopka v njihovi obravnavi.
NCAs require a minimum set of common investigative and decision-making powers to be able to effectively enforce Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
Nacionalni upravni organi, pristojni za konkurenco, bi morali imeti možnost ta pooblastila uporabljati za podjetja in podjetniška združenja, ki so predmet postopkov za uporabo členov 101 in 102 PDEU, pa tudi za druge udeležence na trgu, ki bi lahko razpolagali z informacijami, ki so relevantne za takšne postopke.
National administrative competition authorities should have effective powers of investigation to detect any agreement, decision or concerted practice prohibited by Article 101 TFEU or any abuse of a dominant position prohibited by Article 102 TFEU at any stage of the proceedings before them.
S podelitvijo takih učinkovitih preiskovalnih pooblastil vsem nacionalnim upravnim organom, pristojnim za konkurenco, bi se moralo zagotoviti, da si lahko medsebojno učinkovito pomagajo, kadar so zaprošeni, da na podlagi člena 22 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 v imenu in za račun drugega NOK opravijo pregled ali izvedejo kak drug ukrep za ugotavljanje dejstev na lastnem ozemlju.
The national administrative competition authorities should be able to apply those powers to undertakings and associations of undertakings which are the subject of proceedings for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, as well as to other market players which may be in possession of information which is of relevance to such proceedings.
Preiskovalna pooblastila nacionalnih upravnih organov, pristojnih za konkurenco, bi morala biti zadostna za odziv na izzive pri uveljavljanju pravil konkurence v digitalnem okolju in bi morala NOK omogočiti, da pridobijo vse informacije v zvezi s podjetjem ali podjetniškim združenjem, ki je predmet preiskovalnega ukrepa, v digitalni obliki, vključno s forenzičnimi podatki, ne glede na nosilec, na katerem so informacije shranjene, kot so prenosni računalniki, mobilni telefoni, druge mobilne naprave ali shranjevanje v oblaku.
Granting such effective investigative powers to all national administrative competition authorities should ensure that they are in a position to assist each other effectively when requested to carry out an inspection or any other fact-finding measure on their own territory on behalf of and for the account of another NCA pursuant to Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.
Nacionalni upravni organi, pristojni za konkurenco, bi morali imeti možnost, da opravijo vse potrebne preglede prostorov podjetij in podjetniških združenj, kadar lahko v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča dokažejo, da obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za sum, da je prišlo do kršitve člena 101 ali 102 PDEU.
The investigative powers of national administrative competition authorities should be adequate to meet the enforcement challenges of the digital environment, and should enable NCAs to obtain all information related to the undertaking or association of undertakings which is subject to the investigative measure in digital form, including data obtained forensically, irrespective of the medium on which the information is stored, such as on laptops, mobile phones, other mobile devices or cloud storage.
Ta direktiva državam članicam ne bi smela preprečevati, da za take preglede zahtevajo predhodno odobritev nacionalnega pravosodnega organa.
National administrative competition authorities should be able to carry out all necessary inspections of premises of undertakings and associations of undertakings where, in line with the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, they can show that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting an infringement of Article 101 or 102 TFEU.
Da bi bilo pooblastilo nacionalnih upravnih organov, pristojnih za konkurenco, za opravljanje pregledov učinkovito, bi jim moralo omogočiti dostop do informacij, ki so dostopne podjetju ali združenju podjetij ali osebi, ki je predmet pregleda, in ki so povezane s podjetjem ali podjetniškim združenjem, ki je predmet preiskave.
This Directive should not prevent Member States from requiring prior authorisation by a national judicial authority for such inspections.
To bi moralo nujno vključevati pooblastilo za iskanje dokumentov, datotek ali podatkov na napravah, ki vnaprej niso natančno opredeljene.
To be effective, the power of national administrative competition authorities to carry out inspections should enable them to access information that is accessible to the undertaking or association of undertakings or person subject to the inspection and which is related to the undertaking or the association of undertakings under investigation.
Brez tega pooblastila ne bi bilo mogoče pridobiti potrebnih informacij za preiskavo, kadar bi jo podjetja ali podjetniška združenja ovirala ali zavrnila sodelovanje.
This should necessarily include the power to search for documents, files or data on devices which are not precisely identified in advance.
Pooblastilo za preučitev poslovnih knjig ali dokumentacije bi moralo zajemati vse oblike korespondence, vključno z elektronskimi sporočili, ne glede na to, ali so prikazana kot neprebrana ali so bila izbrisana.
Without such power, it would be impossible to obtain the information necessary for the investigation where undertakings or associations of undertakings adopt an obstructive attitude or refuse to cooperate.
Da bi se čim bolj omejilo nepotrebno podaljšanje pregledov, bi bilo treba nacionalne upravne organe, pristojne za konkurenco, pooblastiti, da bi lahko nadaljevali iskanje in izbrali kopije ali izvlečke iz poslovnih knjig in dokumentacije, povezanih s poslovanjem podjetja ali podjetniškega združenja, ki je predmet preiskave, v prostorih organa ali v drugih za to določenih prostorih.
The power to examine books or records should cover all forms of correspondence, including electronic messages, irrespective of whether they appear to be unread or have been deleted.
Pri tem iskanju bi bilo treba nenehno zagotavljati ustrezno spoštovanje pravic obrambe podjetij.
To minimise the unnecessary prolongation of inspections, national administrative competition authorities should have the power to continue making searches and to select copies or extracts of books and records related to the business of the undertaking or association of undertakings being inspected at the authority's premises or at other designated premises.
Izkušnje kažejo, da se lahko poslovna dokumentacija hrani v domovih vodilnih delavcev in drugih zaposlenih v podjetjih ali podjetniških združenjih, zlasti zaradi vse pogostejše uporabe prožnejših ureditev dela.
Such searches should ensure the continued due respect of undertakings' rights of defence.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitosti pregledov bi morali nacionalni upravni organi, pristojni za konkurenco, imeti pooblastila za vstop v vse prostore, vključno z zasebnimi domovi, če lahko dokažejo, da obstaja utemeljen sum, da se v teh prostorih hrani poslovna dokumentacija, ki bi bila lahko pomembna za dokazovanje kršitve člena 101 ali 102 PDEU.
Experience shows that business records may be kept in the homes of directors, managers and other members of staff of undertakings or of associations of undertakings, in particular because of the increased use of more flexible working arrangements.
Nacionalni upravni organi, pristojni za konkurenco, bi morali za izvajanje tega pooblastila pridobiti predhodno odobritev nacionalnega pravosodnega organa, kar lahko v nekaterih nacionalnih pravnih sistemih vključuje javnega tožilca.
In order to ensure that inspections are effective, national administrative competition authorities should have the power to enter any premises, including private homes, if they can show that there is a reasonable suspicion that business records which may be relevant to prove an infringement of Article 101 or 102 TFEU are being kept in those premises.
To državam članicam ne bi smelo preprečevati, da bi v izjemno nujnih primerih naloge nacionalnega pravosodnega organa zaupale nacionalnemu upravnemu organu, pristojnemu za konkurenco, ki deluje kot pravosodni organ, ali da bi temu organu izjemoma dovolile opravljanje takih pregledov, če v to privolijo osebe, ki so predmet pregleda.
The exercise of that power should be subject to the national administrative competition authority having obtained prior authorisation from a national judicial authority, which may include a public prosecutor in certain national legal systems.
Opravljanje takih pregledov bi lahko nacionalni upravni organ, pristojen za konkurenco, zaupal policiji ali enakovrednemu organu za izvajanje tovrstnih pooblastil, če bi se pregled opravil v prisotnosti nacionalnega upravnega organa, pristojnega za konkurenco.
This should not prevent Member States in cases of extreme urgency from entrusting the tasks of a national judicial authority to a national administrative competition authority acting as a judicial authority or, by way of exception, allowing for such inspections to be carried out with the consent of those subject to inspection.
To ne bi smelo posegati v pravico nacionalnega upravnega organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, da sam opravi pregled in pridobi potrebno pomoč policije ali enakovrednega organa za izvajanje tovrstnih pooblastil, tudi kot previdnostni ukrep, da bi obvladali morebitno nasprotovanje oseb, ki so predmet pregleda.
The conduct of such inspections might be entrusted by a national administrative competition authority to the police or an equivalent enforcement authority, provided that the inspection is carried out in the presence of the national administrative competition authority.
NOK bi morali imeti učinkovita pooblastila, da bi od podjetij ali podjetniških združenj lahko zahtevali, da predložijo informacije, ki so potrebne za odkrivanje kršitev členov 101 in 102 PDEU.
This should be without prejudice to the right of the national administrative competition authority to conduct the inspection itself and to obtain the necessary assistance of the police or an equivalent enforcement authority, including assistance, as a precautionary measure, to overcome possible opposition on the part of those subject to the inspection.
NOK bi tako morali imeti možnost, da zahtevajo razkritje informacij, ki bi jim lahko omogočile, da raziščejo domnevne kršitve.
NCAs should have effective powers to require undertakings or associations of undertakings to provide information necessary to detect infringements of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
To bi moralo vključevati pravico, da zahtevajo informacije v kateri koli digitalni obliki, vključno z elektronsko pošto in sporočili iz sistema za takojšnje sporočanje, ne glede na to, kje se hranijo, tudi v oblaku in na strežnikih, pod pogojem, da so dostopne podjetju ali podjetniškemu združenju, ki je naslovnik zahtevka za informacije.
To that end, NCAs should be able to require the disclosure of information that may enable them to investigate putative infringements.
Ta pravica podjetju ali podjetniškemu združenju ne bi smela povzročiti obveznosti, ki je nesorazmerna glede na potrebe preiskave.
This should include the right to require information in any digital form, including emails and instant messaging system messages, irrespective of where it is stored, including in clouds and on servers, provided it is accessible to the undertaking or association of undertakings which is the addressee of the request for information.
Ne bi smela na primer povzročiti, da ima podjetje ali podjetniško združenje pretirane stroške ali delo.
That right should not result in an obligation on the part of the undertaking or association of undertakings which is disproportionate to the requirements of the investigation.
Pravica zahtevati informacije je sicer bistvenega pomena za odkrivanje kršitev, vendar pa bi moral biti obseg takih zahtev ustrezen.
For example, it should not result in excessive costs or efforts being incurred by the undertaking or association of undertakings.
Take zahteve ne bi smele prisiliti podjetja ali podjetniškega združenja, naj prizna, da je storilo kršitev, saj so to dolžni dokazati NOK.
While the right to require information is crucial for the detection of infringements, such requests should be appropriate in scope.
To ne bi smelo posegati v obveznosti podjetij ali podjetniških združenj, da odgovorijo na vprašanja, ki se nanašajo na dejstva, in predložijo dokumente.
Such requests should not compel an undertaking or association of undertakings to admit that it has committed an infringement, which is incumbent upon the NCAs to prove.
Podobno bi NOK morali imeti učinkovita orodja, s katerimi bi lahko od vsake fizične ali pravne osebe zahtevali, da predloži informacije, ki bi lahko bile relevantne za uporabo členov 101 in 102 PDEU.
This should be without prejudice to the obligations of undertakings or associations of undertakings to answer factual questions and to provide documents.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da določijo postopkovna pravila glede takih zahtev za informacije, kot je njihova pravna oblika, če ta pravila dovoljujejo učinkovito rabo tega orodja.
Similarly, NCAs should have effective tools to require any other natural or legal person to provide information that may be relevant for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
Izkušnje kažejo tudi, da so informacije, predložene prostovoljno na podlagi neobvezne zahteve za informacije, lahko dragocen vir informacij za informirano in dosledno uveljavljanje pravil konkurence.
Member States should be free to provide for procedural rules on such requests for information, such as the legal form they take, provided that those rules allow for the effective use of this tool.
Podobno lahko informacije, ki jih na lastno pobudo predložijo tretje osebe, kot so konkurenti, stranke in potrošniki na trgu, prispevajo k učinkovitemu uveljavljanju pravil konkurence in NOK bi morali to spodbujati.
Experience also shows that information provided on a voluntary basis in response to non-compulsory requests for information can be a valuable source of information for informed and robust enforcement.
Izkušnje kažejo, da je pooblastilo za opravljanje razgovorov koristno orodje za zbiranje dokazov in za pomoč organom, pristojnim za konkurenco, da ocenijo vrednost že zbranih dokazov.
Similarly, the provision of information by third parties, such as competitors, customers and consumers in the market, on their own initiative can contribute to effective enforcement and NCAs should encourage this.
NOK bi morali imeti na voljo učinkovita sredstva, da bi lahko na razgovor poklicali katerega koli predstavnika podjetja ali podjetniškega združenja, katerega koli predstavnika druge pravne osebe in katero koli fizično osebo, ki bi lahko razpolagala z informacijami, relevantnimi za uporabo členov 101 in 102 PDEU.
Experience shows that the power to conduct interviews is a useful tool to collect evidence and to help competition authorities assess the value of already-collected evidence.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da določijo pravila, ki urejajo opravljanje takih razgovorov, če ta pravila dovoljujejo učinkovito rabo tega orodja.
NCAs should have effective means to summon for an interview any representative of an undertaking or association of undertakings, any representative of other legal persons and any natural person who may possess information relevant for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
Nepogrešljivo je, da imajo NOK možnost, da od podjetij in podjetniških združenj zahtevajo prenehanje kršitev člena 101 ali 102 PDEU, vključno kadar se kršitev nadaljuje še po tem, ko so NOK uradno začeli postopke.
Member States should be free to provide for rules governing the conduct of such interviews, provided that such rules allow for the effective use of this tool.
Poleg tega bi NOK morali imeti učinkovita sredstva za ponovno vzpostavitev konkurence na trgu z naložitvijo strukturnih in ravnalnih ukrepov, ki so sorazmerni s storjeno kršitvijo in potrebni za prenehanje kršitve.
It is indispensable for NCAs to be able to require undertakings and associations of undertakings to bring infringements of Article 101 or 102 TFEU to an end, including where the infringement continues after the NCAs have formally initiated proceedings.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti bi morali NOK, kadar izbirajo med dvema enako učinkovitima ukrepoma, izbrati ukrep, ki predstavlja najmanjše breme za podjetje.
Moreover, NCAs should have effective means to restore competition in the market by imposing structural and behavioural remedies which are proportionate to the infringement committed and which are necessary to bring the infringement to an end.
Strukturni ukrepi, kot je obveznost odtujitve deleža v konkurenčnem podjetju ali odprodaja poslovne enote, vplivajo na sredstva podjetja in se zanje lahko šteje, da bodo za podjetje predstavljali večje breme kot ravnalni ukrepi.
The principle of proportionality requires that, when choosing between two equally effective remedies, NCAs should choose the remedy that is least burdensome for the undertaking.
Vendar to NOK ne bi smelo preprečevati, da ugotovijo, da okoliščine konkretne kršitve upravičujejo naložitev strukturnega ukrepa, ker bi bil ta za prenehanje kršitve učinkovitejši od ravnalnega ukrepa.
Structural remedies, such as obligations to dispose of a shareholding in a competitor or to divest a business unit, affect the assets of an undertaking and can be presumed to be more burdensome for the undertaking than behavioural remedies.
Začasni ukrepi so lahko pomembno orodje za to, da se zagotovi, da preiskovana kršitev med potekom preiskave ne povzroči hude in nepopravljive škode za konkurenco.
However, this should not preclude NCAs from finding that the circumstances of a particular infringement justify the imposition of a structural remedy because it would be more effective in bringing the infringement to an end than a behavioural remedy.
To orodje je pomembno tudi za preprečevanje sprememb na trgu, ki bi jih bilo zelo težko odpraviti z odločbo, ki jo NOK sprejme ob koncu postopka.
Interim measures can be an important tool to ensure that, while an investigation is ongoing, the infringement being investigated does not seriously and irreparably harm competition.
NOK bi torej morali imeti pooblastilo, da z odločbo naložijo začasne ukrepe.
This tool is important to avoid market developments that could be very difficult to reverse by a decision taken by an NCA at the end of the proceedings.
To pooblastilo bi se moralo uporabljati vsaj takrat, kadar NOK ugotovi kršitev člena 101 ali 102 PDEU na prvi pogled ter kadar obstaja nevarnost, da se konkurenci povzroči huda in nepopravljiva škoda.
NCAs should therefore have the power to impose interim measures by decision.
Države članice lahko NOK dajo še obsežnejša pooblastila za naložitev začasnih ukrepov.
As a minimum, this power should apply in cases where an NCA has made a prima facie finding of infringement of Article 101 or 102 TFEU and where there is a risk of serious and irreparable harm to competition.
Odločba o naložitvi začasnih ukrepov bi se morala uporabljati samo za določeno časovno obdobje, bodisi dokler NOK ne zaključi postopka bodisi do določenega roka, ki se lahko podaljša, če je to potrebno in ustrezno.
Member States are free to provide NCAs with more extensive powers to impose interim measures.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se lahko zakonitost takih ukrepov, vključno s sorazmernostjo, presoja v hitrih pritožbenih postopkih ali drugih postopkih, ki zagotavljajo tudi hitri sodni nadzor.
A decision imposing interim measures should only be valid for a specified period, either until the conclusion of the proceedings by an NCA, or for a fixed time period which can be renewed insofar as it is necessary and appropriate.
Poleg tega bi morale države članice ustvariti pogoje, potrebne za zagotovitev, da lahko NOK v praksi uporabijo začasne ukrepe.
Member States should ensure that the legality, including the proportionality, of such measures can be reviewed in expedited appeal procedures or other procedures which also provide for expedited judicial control.
Zlasti je treba vsem organom, pristojnim za konkurenco, omogočiti, da se lahko prilagajajo dogajanju na hitro razvijajočih se trgih, ter v okviru Evropske mreže za konkurenco razmisliti o uporabi začasnih ukrepov in pridobljene izkušnje upoštevati pri vsakem ustreznem nezavezujočem ukrepu ali prihodnjem pregledu te direktive.
Furthermore, Member States should create the conditions necessary to ensure that NCAs can make use of interim measures in practice.
Kadar podjetja ali podjetniška združenja med postopkom, ki lahko privede do prepovedi sporazuma ali ravnanja, ponudijo NOK zaveze za odpravo njihovih pomislekov, bi morali ti NOK imeti možnost sprejeti odločbe, s katerimi te zaveze za zadevna podjetja ali podjetniška združenja postanejo zavezujoče in jih je mogoče zoper njih tudi izvršiti.
There is a particular need to enable all competition authorities to deal with developments in fast-moving markets and therefore to reflect within the European Competition Network on the use of interim measures and to take this experience into account in any relevant soft measure or future review of this Directive.
Takšne odločbe o zavezah načeloma niso primerne v primeru skrivnih kartelov, v zvezi s katerimi bi NOK morali izreči globe.