natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It pointed out that the groups of exporting producers selected in the sample consisted of: (1) 13 legal entities that were involved in the production and domestic sales of the product concerned; (2) two related exporters located outside of the Union; and (3) more than ten related importers located in the Union.
Poudarila je, da so skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov, izbranih v vzorec, sestavljene iz: (1) 13 pravnih subjektov, ki so vključeni v proizvodnjo in domačo prodajo zadevnega izdelka; (2) dveh povezanih izvoznikov s sedežem zunaj Unije in (3) več kot desetih povezanih uvoznikov s sedežem v Uniji.
Therefore, the Commission considered that more exporting producers could not be reasonably investigated within the time available.
Zato je Komisija menila, da več proizvajalcev izvoznikov v razpoložljivem času ni mogoče razumno preiskati.
BIPAVER also considered that two of the sampled companies were not representative recipients of countervailable subsidies because they have their headquarters and some production facilities outside of the PRC.
Združenje BIPAVER je tudi menilo, da dve vzorčeni družbi nista bili reprezentativni prejemnici subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, ker imata sedež in nekaj proizvodnih zmogljivosti zunaj LRK.
The Commission noted that the fact that an individual company might not have received directly a specific type of alleged subsidy did not render the sample non-representative, as the purpose of the sample was to represent the overall tyres industry in the PRC with regard to eligibility for all types of alleged subsidies.
Komisija je ugotovila, da zaradi dejstva, da posamezna družba morda ni neposredno prejela določene vrste domnevne subvencije, vzorec ni nereprezentativen, saj je bil namen vzorca, da predstavlja celotno industrijo pnevmatik v LRK glede upravičenosti do vseh vrst domnevnih subvencij.
The four sampled groups of exporting producers were representative in terms of eligibility for the subsidies alleged in the complaint.
Štiri vzorčene skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov so bile reprezentativne, kar zadeva upravičenost do domnevnih subvencij, navedenih v pritožbi.
Hence, the Commission considered that the selected sample represents a proper basis to examine the existence and the extent of the alleged subsidisation.
Zato je po mnenju Komisije izbrani vzorec ustrezna podlaga za proučitev obstoja in obsega domnevnega subvencioniranja.
The proposed sample hence complies with Article 27(1)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Predlagani vzorec je torej v skladu s členom 27(1)(b) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission therefore decided to retain the proposed sample as the final sample.
Komisija se je zato odločila, da predlagani vzorec ohrani kot končni vzorec.
In addition to the four sampled exporting producers, six exporting producers declared that, in the event that they are not selected to be in the sample, they would like to receive a questionnaire and other claim forms in order to claim an individual examination under Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg štirih vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je šest proizvajalcev izvoznikov izjavilo, da bi v primeru, da ne bodo izbrani v vzorec, želeli prejeti vprašalnik in druge obrazce zahtevka, da zahtevajo individualno preiskavo v skladu s členom 27(3) osnovne uredbe.
As requested, the Commission sent questionnaires to these six exporting producers.
V skladu z zahtevo je Komisija poslala vprašalnike tem šestim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
However, none of them replied to the questionnaire.
Vendar nobeden od njih ni izpolnil vprašalnika.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the four sampled Chinese exporting producers; the non-sampled exporting producers as well as the sampled Union producers.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala štirim vzorčenim kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, nevzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom in vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije.
Questionnaire replies were received from the four sampled Chinese exporting producers and from ten sampled Union producers.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je prejela od štirih vzorčenih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in desetih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
None of the non-sampled exporting producers sent a reply to the questionnaires.
Na vprašalnik ni odgovoril nobeden od nevzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
A questionnaire was also sent to the GOC.
Vprašalnik je bil poslan tudi kitajski vladi.
It included specific questionnaires for the China Development Bank (‘CDB’), Export Import Bank of China (‘EXIM’), Agricultural Bank of China (‘ABC’), Bank of China (‘BOC’), and the Chinese Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (‘Sinosure’).
Vključeval je posebne vprašalnike za Kitajsko razvojno banko, Kitajsko izvozno-uvozno banko, Kitajsko kmetijsko banko, Banko Kitajske in družbo Chinese Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Sinosure).
Those financial institutions had been specifically referred to in the complaint as public bodies or bodies directed and entrusted granting subsidies.
Zadevne finančne institucije so bile izrecno navedene v pritožbi kot javni organi ali organi, ki jim je bilo naloženo dodeljevanje subvencij in so bile za to tudi pooblaščene.
In addition, the GOC was asked to forward the specific questionnaire for financial institutions to any other financial institution that provided loans or export credits to the sampled companies, or to the buyers of the sampled companies.
Od kitajske vlade se je tudi zahtevalo, naj navedeni posebni vprašalnik za finančne institucije pošlje vsem drugim finančnim institucijam, ki so vzorčenim družbam ali kupcem vzorčenih družb zagotavljale posojila ali izvozne kredite.
The GOC was also asked to gather any responses provided by these financial institutions and to send them directly to the Commission.
Poleg tega se je od nje zahtevalo, naj zbere vse odgovore teh finančnih institucij in jih pošlje neposredno Komisiji.
Furthermore, the questionnaire for the GOC included specific questionnaires for those producers of natural rubber, synthetic rubber, carbon black and nylon cord which, according to the complaint, provided inputs at less than adequate remuneration to the sampled companies, i.e. Sinopec, Sinopec Baling Co., Chemchina, Shandong Haohua, Jiangxi Blackcat Carbon Black Co., Ltd, Hangzhou Zhongce Qingquan Industrial Co., Ltd and Suqian Junma Tyre Cord Company Limited.
Vprašalnik za kitajsko vlado je vseboval tudi posebne vprašalnike za proizvajalce naravnega kavčuka, sintetičnega kavčuka, ogljenih saj in korda iz najlona, ki so glede na pritožbo vzorčenim družbam, tj. Sinopec, Sinopec Baling Co., ChemChina, Shandong Haohua, Jiangxi Blackcat Carbon Black Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Zhongce Qingquan Industrial Co., Ltd. in Suqian Junma Tyre Cord Company Limited, zagotavljali surovine za plačilo, ki je nižje od primernega.
In addition, the GOC was asked to forward that specific questionnaire to all other producers and distributors of the raw materials in question which had provided inputs to the sampled companies.
Poleg tega se je od kitajske vlade zahtevalo, naj ta posebni vprašalnik pošlje vsem drugim proizvajalcem in distributerjem zadevnih surovin, ki so vzorčenim družbam zagotavljali surovine.
The GOC was also asked to gather any responses provided by these producers and to send them directly to the Commission.
Od nje se je tudi zahtevalo, naj zbere vse odgovore teh proizvajalcev in jih pošlje neposredno Komisiji.
The Commission received questionnaire replies from the GOC, which included replies to the specific questionnaire from EXIM, BOC, ABC and Sinosure.
Komisija je od kitajske vlade prejela izpolnjene vprašalnike, kar je vključevalo posebne vprašalnike, ki so jih izpolnili Kitajska izvozno-uvozna banka, Banka Kitajske, Kitajska kmetijska banka in družba Sinosure.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the determination of subsidy, injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev subvencije, škode in interesa Unije.
A verification visit took place at the premises of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, during which officials from other relevant ministries also participated.
V prostorih kitajskega ministrstva za trgovino je bil opravljen preveritveni obisk, pri katerem so sodelovali tudi uradniki iz drugih ustreznih ministrstev.
Moreover, representatives from the following financial institutions were present during this verification visit;
Tega preveritvenega obiska so se udeležili tudi predstavniki naslednjih finančnih institucij:
Export Import Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Kitajske izvozno-uvozne banke, Peking, Kitajska;
Agricultural Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Kitajske kmetijske banke, Peking, Kitajska;
Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Banke Kitajske, Peking, Kitajska in
Sinosure, Beijing, China.
družbe Sinosure, Kitajska.
Moreover, verification visits pursuant to Article 26 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Poleg tega so bili preveritveni obiski v skladu s členom 26 osnovne uredbe opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Sampled Union producers
vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije
Good Year Firma Oponiarska, Poland;
Good Year Firma Oponiarska, Poljska;
Wetest, Czech Republic;
Wetest, Češka;
Pneumatici, Italy;
Pneumatici, Italija;
Banden plant, the Netherlands;
Banden plant, Nizozemska;
Marangoni SpA Ltd Italy;
Marangoni SpA Ltd., Italija;
Roline N.V., the Netherlands;
Roline N.V., Nizozemska;
four Union producers which requested confidentiality.
štirje proizvajalci Unije, ki so zaprosili za zaupnost;
Sampled unrelated importers in the Union
vzorčeni nepovezani uvozniki v Uniji
Heuver Bandengroothandel B.V, the Netherlands;
Heuver Bandengroothandel B.V, Nizozemska;
Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Germany.
Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Nemčija;
Sampled producers in the PRC
vzorčeni proizvajalci v LRK
Aeolus Tyre Co. Ltd, Jiaozuo, PRC;
Aeolus Tyre Co. Ltd., Jiaozuo, LRK;
Beijing Rubber Research and Design Institute, Beijing, PRC;
Beijing Rubber Research and Design Institute, Beijing, LRK;
Chemchina Corporation, Beijing, PRC;
Chemchina Corporation, Beijing, LRK;
Chemchina Finance, Beijing, PRC;
Chemchina Finance, Beijing, LRK;
China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd, Beijing, PRC;
China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd., Beijing, LRK;
Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co. Ltd, Taiyuan, PRC;
Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd., Taiyuan, LRK;
Chonche Auto Repair Group Co. Ltd, Beijing, PRC;
Chonche Auto Repair Group Co. Ltd., Beijing, LRK;
Henan Tyre Group Co. Ltd, Jiaozuo, PRC;
Henan Tyre Group Co. Ltd., Jiaozuo, LRK;
Yanzhou Ruiyuan Rubber Plastic Co. Ltd:, Jining, PRC;
Yanzhou Ruiyuan Rubber Plastic Co. Ltd.:, Jining, LRK;
Yinhe Power Plant Co. Ltd, Jining, PRC;
Yinhe Power Plant Co. Ltd., Jining, LRK;
QingdaoYellow Sea (Rubber) Group Co. Ltd, Qingdao, PRC;
QingdaoYellow Sea (Rubber) Group Co. Ltd., Qingdao, LRK;
Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co. Ltd, Qingdao, PRC;
Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co. Ltd., Qingdao, LRK;
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd, Jining, PRC.
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd., Jining, LRK.
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Shanghai, PRC;
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Shanghai, LRK;
Giti Tire (Anhui) Co. Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
Giti Tire (Anhui) Co. Ltd., Hefei, LRK;
GITI Radial Tire (Anhui) Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
GITI Radial Tire (Anhui) Ltd., Hefei, LRK;
Anhui Prime Cord Fabrics Company Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
Anhui Prime Cord Fabrics Company Ltd., Hefei, LRK;
Giti Tire (Hualin) Co. Ltd, Hualin, PRC;
Giti Tire (Hualin) Co. Ltd., Hualin, LRK;
Giti Tire (Fujian) Co. Ltd, Fujian, PRC;
Giti Tire (Fujian) Co. Ltd., Fujian, LRK;
GITI Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd, Yinchuan, PRC;
GITI Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd., Yinchuan, LRK;
GITI Greatwall Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd, Yinchuan, PRC;
GITI Greatwall Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd., Yinchuan, LRK;
GITI Tyre (Chongqing) Company Ltd, Chongqing, PRC;
GITI Tyre (Chongqing) Company Ltd., Chongqing, LRK;
GITI Steel Cord (Hubei) Company Ltd, Hubei, PRC;
GITI Steel Cord (Hubei) Company Ltd., Hubei, LRK;
Engineering Shanghai Company Ltd, Shanghai, PRC;
Engineering Shanghai Company Ltd., Shanghai, LRK;
Seyen Machinery (Shanghai) Company Ltd, Shanghai, PRC.
Seyen Machinery (Shanghai) Company Ltd., Shanghai, LRK;
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co. Ltd, Shanghai, PRC;
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co. Ltd., Shanghai, LRK;
Chongqing Hankook Tire Co. Ltd, Chongqing, PRC;
Chongqing Hankook Tire Co. Ltd., Chongqing, LRK;
Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co. Ltd, Jiangsu, PRC;
Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co. Ltd., Jiangsu, LRK;
Xingyuan Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Xingyuan Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, LRK;
Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, LRK;
Xingyuan International Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Xingyuan International Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, LRK;
Guangda Tyre Co Ltd, Dongying, PRC.
Guangda Tyre Co Ltd., Dongying, LRK.
Non-imposition of provisional measures and subsequent procedure
Neuvedba začasnih ukrepov in naknadni postopek
Given that it had imposed provisional measures in the parallel anti-dumping case in May 2018, the Commission decided not to impose provisional measures in the present case.
Ker je Komisija maja 2018 uvedla začasne ukrepe v vzporedni protidampinški preiskavi, se je odločila, da v sedanji preiskavi ne bo uvedla začasnih ukrepov.
On 13 July 2018, all interested parties received an Information Document describing the Commission's preliminary findings on the alleged subsidy schemes and the Commission's preliminary conclusions as far as injury, causation and Union interest were concerned, as set out in the provisional anti-dumping Regulation.
13. julija 2018 so vse zainteresirane strani prejele informativni dokument z opisom predhodnih ugotovitev Komisije o domnevnih shemah subvencioniranja ter predhodnih sklepih Komisije glede škode, vzročne zveze in interesa Unije iz uredbe o uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev.
Several interested parties made written submissions on the information document.
Več zainteresiranih strani je predložilo pisna stališča o informativnem dokumentu.
Following the disclosure of the Information Document, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd claimed that it should not be considered as a related company of China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd (‘CNRC’).
Po razkritju informativnega dokumenta je družba Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. trdila, da je ne bi smeli šteti za povezano družbo družbe China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CNRC).
In this sense, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd disagreed with the application of Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementing Act (EU) 2015/2447 (the ‘Union Customs Code’) for the purpose of calculating a weighted average amount of subsidisation for related companies.
V zvezi s tem se družba Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. ni strinjala z uporabo člena 127 Izvedbenega akta carinskega zakonika Unije (EU) 2015/2447 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: carinski zakonik Unije) za namene izračuna tehtanega povprečnega zneska subvencije za povezane družbe.
Instead, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd referred to the definition of Article 16 of the ASCM Agreement, which requires control of one company over another, in order to establish the relation between companies.
Sklicevala se je na opredelitev iz člena 16 sporazuma STO o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih, ki zahteva nadzor ene družbe nad drugo, da se določi povezava med družbami.
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd then argued that Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd would not qualify as a related company under this standard, as it was allegedly not controlled by CNRC.
Nato je trdila, da se v skladu s tem standardom ne bi štela za povezano družbo, saj domnevno ni bila pod nadzorom družbe CNRC.
In addition, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd noted that the basic Regulation did not make any reference to the Union Customs Code.
Navedla je tudi, da se osnovna uredba ne sklicuje na carinski zakonik Unije.
The Commission recalled that Article 16 of the ASCM Agreement is mirrored in Article 9(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je opozorila, da se člen 16 sporazuma STO o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih izraža v členu 9(2) osnovne uredbe.
However, both articles refer only to the definition of the Union industry and the relationship of Union producers to exporting producers.
Vendar se oba člena nanašata le na opredelitev industrije Unije in povezavo proizvajalcev Unije s proizvajalci izvozniki.
In that context, a Union producer may be taken from the definition of the Union industry if it is controlled by an exporting producer.
V zvezi s tem je proizvajalec Unije, če je pod nadzorom proizvajalca izvoznika, lahko izločen iz opredelitve industrije Unije.
In contrast, both the ASCM Agreement and the basic Regulation are silent about the method how to assess the relationship between exporting producers for the purpose of establishing the amount of subsidisation.
V nasprotju s tem pa sporazum STO o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih in osnovna uredba ne omenjata povezave med proizvajalci izvozniki za določitev zneska subvencije.
In order to ensure that measures can be enforced effectively, particularly to avoid channelling exports through a related company with the lowest duty, it is the Commission's practice to establish the relationship between exporting producers through the criteria laid down in Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementing Act (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015.
Za zagotovitev učinkovite uveljavitve ukrepov, zlasti za preprečitev usmerjanja izvoza prek povezane družbe z najnižjo dajatvijo, ima Komisija prakso, da določi povezavo med proizvajalci izvozniki na podlagi meril iz člena 127 Izvedbenega akta carinskega zakonika Unije (EU) 2015/2447 z dne 24. novembra 2015.
This was clearly communicated to all parties in the Notice of initiation at the start of the proceeding.
O tem so bile vse strani jasno obveščene z obvestilom o začetku na začetku postopka.
In addition, reference to Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementation Act is explicitly contained in Article 2(1) of the basic Anti-dumping Regulation and the Commission should have the same treatment of parties in both anti-dumping and anti-subsidy cases.
Poleg tega je sklicevanje na člen 127 Izvedbenega akta carinskega zakonika Unije izrecno vsebovano v členu 2(1) osnovne protidampinške uredbe, Komisija pa bi morala enako obravnavati strani v protidampinški in tudi protisubvencijski preiskavi.
CNRC is the largest shareholder of Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd During the investigation period, it owned 65 % of the shares.
Zato se v okviru te preiskave za družbi Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. in CNRC šteje, da sta povezani.
As of today, it still holds 46 % of the shares.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Therefore, in the context of this investigation, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd and CNRC are considered to be related.
Družba Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. je tudi pripomnila, da je ne bi smeli šteti za proizvajalca izvoznika, ampak le za sodelujočo stranko, saj je družba proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka prenehala novembra 2017.
The claim was thus rejected.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bila družba Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. v celotnem obdobju preiskave proizvajalec izvoznik.
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd also commented that it should be considered only as a cooperating party, and not as an exporting producer, since the company stopped the production of the product concerned in November 2017.
Dejstvo, da je družba nato prenehala proizvodnjo, ne spremeni rezultata preiskave.
The Commission established that Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd was an exporting producer during the entire investigation period.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
The fact that subsequently the company ceased the production does not alter the result of the investigation.
Družba Pirelli je po dokončnem razkritju ponovila svojo trditev, da deluje neodvisno od skupine China National Tire Group.
The claim was therefore rejected.
Vendar nobena od trditev ni bila utemeljena z dodatnimi dokazi.
Following final disclosure Pirelli reiterated its claim that it functions independently from the China National Tire Group.
Družba Pirelli zlasti ni oporekala lastniški strukturi, ki jo je Komisija opisala v Prilogi 2 k dokončnemu razkritju.
However, none of the claims was substantiated with additional evidence.
Zato je Komisija to trditev zavrnila.
In particular, Pirelli did not contest the ownership structure described by the Commission in annex 2 of its final disclosure.
Komisija je nadaljevala zbiranje in preverjanje vseh informacij, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za oblikovanje dokončnih ugotovitev.
Therefore the Commission rejected this claim.
Ker sta obdobje škode in obdobje preiskave enaki kot v vzporedni protidampinški preiskavi, je Komisija 1. junija 2018 obvestila zainteresirane strani, da se bodo informacije in pripombe, predložene v zvezi s škodo v okviru protidampinške preiskave, upoštevale tudi v tej preiskavi.
The Commission continued seeking and verifying all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Nobena od strani temu pristopu ni nasprotovala.
Given that the injury period and the investigation period are the same as in the parallel anti-dumping investigation, the Commission informed, on 1 June 2018, interested parties that the information and comments submitted concerning injury in the framework of the anti-dumping investigation were also going to be taken into account for this investigation.
V vzporedni protidampinški preiskavi so strani 24. julija 2018 prejele dokument o dokončnem razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je Komisija nameravala uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
None of the parties opposed to this approach.
Poleg tega so zainteresirane strani 10. septembra 2018 prejele dodatno razkritje.
In the parallel anti-dumping investigation parties received, on 24 July 2018, final disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the product concerned into the Union.
Kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 60, so bile pripombe, predložene v okviru navedenih razkritij v zvezi s škodo, vzročno zvezo in interesom Unije, v celoti proučene v tej preiskavi, ter so se, kjer je bilo ustrezno, upoštevale in vključile v ugotovitve te preiskave.
Furthermore interested parties received an additional disclosure on 10 September 2018.
Dokončno razkritje
As described in recital (60) above the comments submitted in the framework of those disclosures were in so far they concerned injury, causation and Union interest fully considered in this investigation and, where appropriate, taken into account and reflected in the findings of this investigation.
Komisija je 28. septembra 2018 obvestila vse strani o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala uvesti dokončno protisubvencijsko dajatev na uvoz zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
Final disclosure
Za vse strani je bil določen rok, v katerem so lahko predložile pripombe v zvezi z dokončnim razkritjem (tj. 8. oktober 2018).
On 28 September 2018, the Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-subsidy duty on imports of the product concerned into the Union.
Več zainteresiranih strani je zaprosilo za podaljšanje roka.
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the final disclosure (i.e. 8 October 2018).
Komisija je tem stranem odobrila podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb do 10. oktobra 2018 ob 10.00.
Several interested parties requested an extension of the deadline.
Pisne pripombe o dokončnem razkritju so predložili zbornica CCCMC, združenje CRIA, trije od štirih vzorčenih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in dva nepovezana uvoznika.
The Commission granted until 10 October 2018 10AM for submitting comments to those parties.
Skupina China National Tire Group je po dokončnem razkritju trdila, da je Komisija kršila njeno pravico do obrambe, ko je zavrnila njeno prošnjo za dodatno podaljšanje roka, določenega za predložitev pripomb o dokončnem razkritju.
The CCCMC, the CRIA, three out of the four sampled Chinese exporting producers, two unrelated importers made written submissions commenting on the final disclosure.
Po njenem mnenju Komisija desetdnevnega obdobja ne bi smela obravnavati kot fiksnega roka.