natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission analysed the export data provided by the CCCME and found that this data could not alter its findings on trends of market share, import volume and Union consumption during the period considered.
Komisija je analizirala podatke o izvozu, ki jih je predložila CCCME, ter ugotovila, da se zaradi teh podatkov njene ugotovitve o trendih v zvezi s tržnim deležem, obsegom uvoza in potrošnjo Unije v obravnavanem obdobju ne morejo spremeniti.
Consequently, the Commission rejected the claim that the import data used by it were unreliable.
Zato je Komisija zavrnila trditev, da so bili podatki o uvozu, ki jih je uporabila, nezanesljivi.
The Commission noted that the method used by the complainants to arrive at the import data related to the product concerned during the period considered was based on Eurostat data.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je metoda, ki so jo uporabili pritožniki, da so pridobili podatke o uvozu v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom za obravnavano obdobje, temeljila na podatkih Eurostata.
This method included for 2013 the totals of CN codes 73251050 and 73251092, a percentage of 30 % of CN code 73251099, and CN code 73259910 minus a fixed volume.
Ta metoda je za leto 2013 vključevala celotne obsege za oznaki KN 73251050 in 73251092, 30-odstotni delež za oznako KN 73251099 ter oznako KN 73259910, zmanjšano za fiksen obseg.
Following a change in CN codes the complainants used for 2014 until the investigation period a percentage of 60 % of CN code 73251000 with regards imports from the PRC and CN code 73259910 minus a fixed volume.
Po spremembi oznak KN so pritožniki za obdobje od leta 2014 do obdobja preiskave uporabili 60-odstotni delež za oznako KN 73251000 v zvezi z uvozom iz LRK ter oznako KN 73259910, zmanjšano za fiksen obseg.
As the Commission found no other alternative source of information that would more accurately reflect the import data for the product concerned, it considered the method based on Eurostat data as the most appropriate one.
Ker Komisija ni ugotovila nobenega drugega vira informacij, ki bi točneje izražal podatke o uvozu za zadevni izdelek, je menila, da je metoda na podlagi podatkov Eurostata najustreznejša.
Therefore, it rejected the claim from the CCCME.
Zato je trditev CCCME zavrnila.
Both FCI and the CCCME submitted that the methodology used to assess the imports from the PRC incorrectly included all products imported under CN code 73259910 minus a fixed volume, as proposed by the complainants, since this code was not typically used for the product concerned before the imposition of anti-dumping measures in 2005 and the complainants have not provided evidence that this CN code was used for imports of the product concerned after 2009.
FCI in CCCME sta trdila, da je metodologija, uporabljena za oceno uvoza iz LRK, napačno vključevala vse izdelke, uvožene pod oznako KN 73259910, pri čemer se je odštel fiksen obseg, kot so predlagali pritožniki, saj se ta oznaka ni običajno uporabljala za zadevni izdelek pred uvedbo protidampinških ukrepov leta 2005, pritožniki pa niso predložili dokazov o tem, da se je ta oznaka KN uporabljala za uvoz zadevnega izdelka po letu 2009.
Therefore, FCI requested the exclusion or taking into account a ratio of this CN code for the calculation of the import volume of the product concerned.
Zato je FCI zahtevalo izključitev te oznake KN ali upoštevanje razmerja zanjo za izračun obsega uvoza zadevnega izdelka.
The Commission noted that an analysis of the imports under this CN code since the imposition of provisional measures until the beginning of October 2017 has shown significant imports of 6796 tonnes under the TARIC code 7325991051 from the PRC which exclusively refers to the product concerned.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bil pri analizi uvoza pod to oznako KN od uvedbe začasnih ukrepov do začetka oktobra 2017 ugotovljen precejšnji uvoz v obsegu 6796 ton pod oznako TARIC 7325991051 iz LRK, ki se nanaša izključno na zadevni izdelek.
Therefore, it is clear that the product concerned is imported also under CN code 73259910.
Zato je jasno, da se zadevni izdelek uvaža tudi pod oznako KN 73259910.
However, the Commission did not have any evidence that imports of other products under this CN code have followed the same trend as the product concerned since 2005.
Vendar Komisija ni imela dokazov, da je bil tudi uvoz drugih izdelkov pod to oznako KN od leta 2005 enak kot za zadevni izdelek.
Consequently, using a percentage over the period considered would be unreliable.
Zato uporaba odstotnega deleža v obravnavanem obdobju ne bi bila zanesljiva.
Therefore the Commission decided to not adjust the volume of imports from the PRC.
Zato se je Komisija odločila, da ne bo prilagodila obsega uvoza iz LRK.
The Commission furthermore noted that even if it would exclude this CN code from its analysis, the volume of imports would still show a comparable increase in market share over the period considered.
Komisija je poleg tega ugotovila, da bi bilo primerljivo povečanje tržnega deleža uvoza v obravnavanem obdobju ugotovljeno tudi, če bi iz svoje analize izključila to oznako KN.
The CCCME submitted that neither the complainants nor the Commission have explained the percentage estimated of the import volume of the product concerned under CN codes 73251099 and the reason why the percentage of the import volume under code 73251099 has been stable during the period considered.
CCCME je trdila, da niti pritožniki niti Komisija niso pojasnili ocenjenega deleža obsega uvoza zadevnega izdelka pod oznako KN 73251099 in razlogov, zakaj je delež obsega uvoza pod oznako 73251099 v obravnavanem obdobju ostal nespremenjen.
As addressed in recital (122) of the provisional Regulation, the Commission based the determination of the import volume of the product concerned from the PRC on the method proposed by the complainants because it considered it reliable and objective.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 122 začasne uredbe, je Komisija obseg uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz LRK določila na podlagi metode, ki so jo predlagali pritožniki, saj je menila, da je zanesljiva in objektivna.
No other more reliable method was proposed by any party.
Nobena stran ni predlagala zanesljivejše metode.
For the exclusion of channel gratings, the Commission took the average sales of channel gratings of the sampled Chinese exporting producers in the investigation period, amounting to 10 % of total imports.
Za izključitev kanalskih rešetk je Komisija uporabila povprečno prodajo kanalskih rešetk pri vzorčenih kitajskih proizvajalcih izvoznikih v obdobju preiskave, ki je obsegala 10 % celotnega uvoza.
This percentage has been used for the period considered.
Ta delež se je uporabil za obravnavano obdobje.
As the CCCME has not provided any alternative data for the import volume of channel gratings from the PRC, the claim was rejected.
Ker CCCME ni zagotovila drugih podatkov za obseg uvoza kanalskih rešetk iz LRK, je bila trditev zavrnjena.
FCI submitted that no significant increase in imports can be established in this case, when considering all years since the expiry of the anti-dumping measures in 2010, imports only increased between 2013 and 2014 and while imports in the investigation period were above 2013 levels, they were well below the import levels of 2010 and 2011.
FCI je trdilo, da v tem primeru ni mogoče ugotoviti znatnega povečanja uvoza, če se upoštevajo vsa leta od izteka veljavnosti protidampinških ukrepov v letu 2010; uvoz se je povečal samo med letoma 2013 in 2014, in čeprav je uvoz v obdobju preiskave presegal ravni iz leta 2013, je bil precej manjši od ravni v letih 2010 in 2011.
The Commission found the period considered to be reasonable and in line with the standard Commission practice to examine the trends relevant for the assessment of injury.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je obravnavano obdobje razumno in v skladu z njeno standardno prakso za proučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode.
It therefore did not take into consideration the years before, as suggested by FCI.
Zato v nasprotju s predlogom FCI predhodnih let ni upoštevala.
With regard to undercutting, FCI submitted that the provisional calculations are misleading, as they compared the prices of the products sold by the Chinese foundries to importers in the Union with that of products sold by the Union industry to final customers and did not take into account expenses borne exclusively by the unrelated importers.
V zvezi z nelojalnim nižanjem prodajnih cen je FCI trdilo, da so začasni izračuni zavajajoči, saj se pri njih cene izdelkov, ki so jih kitajske livarne prodale uvoznikom v Uniji, primerjajo s ceno izdelkov, ki jih je industrija Unije prodala končnim strankam, ne upoštevajo pa se stroški, ki so jih imeli samo nepovezani uvozniki.
Such costs include R & D costs, costs for the creation of patterns and prototypes, certification costs, homologation costs, quality checks and conformity checks, warehouse costs, and sales costs.
Taki stroški vključujejo stroške raziskav in razvoja, stroške priprave patentov in izdelave prototipov, stroške potrjevanja, stroške homologacije, preglede kakovosti in skladnosti, stroške skladiščenja in prodajne stroške.
The Commission verified this data and decided to adjust the undercutting margins for such costs.
Komisija je te podatke preverila in se odločila, da bo prilagodila stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen za take stroške.
The Union industry's ex-works prices were adjusted downwards by the weighted average R & D costs of the sampled Union producers which covered all relevant costs mentioned in the previous recital.
Cene franko tovarna industrije Unije so bile prilagojene navzdol na podlagi tehtanega povprečja stroškov raziskav in razvoja vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, ki so zajemali vse ustrezne stroške, navedene v prejšnji uvodni izjavi.
The adjustment was 2,2 % of the turnover of the sampled Union producers.
Prilagoditev je znašala 2,2 % prihodkov od prodaje vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
Furthermore, an adjustment of around 33 EUR per tonne was made on the import price for importation costs on the basis of the data of the two unrelated importers verified after the imposition of the provisional measures.
Poleg tega je bila uvozna cena prilagojena za približno 33 EUR na tono za stroške uvoza na podlagi podatkov obeh nepovezanih uvoznikov, ki so bili preverjeni po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov.
For the purposes of determination of injury, the effect of the dumped imports on prices is analysed as one of the injury indicators and Article 3(3) of the basic Regulation requires the undercutting to be significant.
Za ugotovitev škode se učinek dampinškega uvoza na cene analizira kot eden od kazalnikov škode, v skladu s členom 3(3) osnovne uredbe pa mora biti nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen znatno.
In this case the undercutting in the range of 31,6 % to 39,2 % could be considered significant.
V tem primeru bi se lahko štelo, da je nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen v razponu od 31,6 % do 39,2 % znatno.
For such a finding it is not necessary that each and every transaction shows undercutting.
V vsakem primeru so za informativne namene stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike naslednje:
This is so because the effect and the impact of the dumped imports on the Union industry is analysed as a whole; this includes the undercutting by the dumped imports.
Preglednica 2
In any event, for information, the undercutting margins of the sampled exporting producers are as follows:
Stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen
Table 2
Stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen
Undercutting margins
Po končnem razkritju so pritožniki izrazili nasprotovanje metodologiji, ki jo je Komisija uporabila za prilagoditev njihovih cen franko tovarna navzdol, namesto da bi prilagodila uvozne cene navzgor, saj večino stroškov raziskav in razvoja nimajo uvozniki, ampak proizvajalci v LRK.
Undercutting margin
Pritožniki so menili še, da so bili stroški po uvozu previsoki in morda vključujejo stroške, povezane z uvozom kanalskih rešetk, ter napačno uvozno dajatev v višini 2,7 % namesto 1,7 % za vse izdelke iz nodularnega železa.
Following final disclosure, the complainants objected to the methodology used by the Commission in adjusting their ex-works prices downwards rather than adjusting the import prices upwards, while most of the R & D costs are not borne by importers at all but are incurred by the producers in the PRC.
Prilagoditev stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen in stopnje odprave škode za stroške raziskav in razvoja je na eni strani temeljila na preverjenih podatkih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, na drugi strani pa na dokazih, predloženih pri preveritvenih obiskih pri nepovezanih uvoznikih, ki so kazali, da imajo take stroške za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka v LRK.
Further, the complainants considered that the post-importation costs were too high and may include costs related to imports of channel gratings and an incorrect import duty of 2,7 % instead of 1,7 % for all ductile iron products.
Ker pritožniki niso predložili dokazov za svojo trditev, da navedenih stroškov nimajo nepovezani uvozniki, je Komisija njihovo trditev zavrnila.
The adjustment of R & D costs to the undercutting margin and injury elimination level was based upon, on the one hand, verified data of the sampled Union producers, and on the other hand, evidence shown during the verification visits to the unrelated importers that they incur such costs for the production of the product concerned in the PRC.
Izračun stroškov po uvozu temelji na preverjenih podatkih dveh vzorčenih nepovezanih uvoznikov.
As the complainants did not provide evidence to their claim that those costs are not incurred by the unrelated importers, the Commission rejected their claim.
Ti podatki so se nanašali izključno na zadevni izdelek in niso vključevali izključenih izdelkov (npr. kanalskih rešetk).
The calculation of post importation costs is based upon verified data of the two sampled unrelated importers.
Zato je Komisija to trditev zavrnila.
These data were solely for the product concerned, so did not include the excluded products (e.g. channel gratings).
V zvezi s prilagoditvijo za uvozne dajatve je Komisija uporabila stopnjo carine, ki se uporablja za uvoz izdelkov iz nodularnega železa.
Therefore, the Commission rejected this claim.
Morebitnih nepravilnih deklaracij za izogibanje plačilu pravilne stopnje uvoznih dajatev ni upoštevala.
Regarding the adjustment for import duties, the Commission used the rate of customs duty applicable to imports of ductile iron products.
Zato je bila ta trditev prav tako zavrnjena.
It did not take into account possible misdeclarations to avoid paying the correct level of import duties.
Po končnem razkritju je FCI predložilo rezultate dveh nedavnih razpisov, ki so ju začeli italijanski javni organi in na katerih so bili izbrani proizvajalci Unije (preprodajalec zanje), ki so za podobni izdelek ponudili nižjo ceno kot nepovezani uvozniki za zadevni izdelek, pri čemer je bila ta cena veliko nižja od tiste, ki so jo navedli pritožniki in je bila navedena v začasni uredbi.
Therefore, this claim was also rejected.
Komisija je ugotovila, da taki novejši, nepreverjeni dokazi ne zadostujejo za sklep, da bi bilo treba šteti, da so njeni preverjeni podatki za obdobje preiskave nezanesljivi.
Following final disclosure, FCI provided the results of two recent tenders launched by Italian public bodies, which were won by (a reseller of) Union producers, offering a lower price for the like product than the unrelated importers for the product concerned that was much lower than what was declared by the complainants and reported in the provisional Regulation.
Poleg tega mešanica sestavin v teh razpisih odstopa od mešanice sestavin pri povprečni proizvodnji in ustreznih stroškov proizvodnje.
The Commission noted that such recent anecdotal evidence is not sufficient to conclude that its verified data for the investigation period should be considered unreliable.
Ker drugih pripomb glede uvoza iz LRK ni bilo in po reviziji izračunov nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen iz uvodnih izjav 119 do 122, je Komisija potrdila vse druge sklepe iz uvodnih izjav 115 do 128 začasne uredbe.
Furthermore the product mix of these tenders diverts from the average production product mix and its corresponding cost of production.
Gospodarski položaj industrije Unije
In the absence of any other comments with respect to the imports from the PRC and further to the revision of the undercutting calculations set out in recitals (119) to (122), the Commission confirmed all other conclusions set out in recitals (115) to (128) of the provisional Regulation.
Splošne opombe
Economic situation of the Union industry
CCCME je ugotovila, da je Komisija opravila analizo makroekonomskih podatkov na podlagi dejanskih podatkov v zvezi s pritožniki in industrijo, ki jih podpira, ter ocen, ki so jih pritožniki predložili za preostalo industrijo Unije.
General remarks
Trdila je, da teh ocen ni mogoče šteti za pozitivne dokaze, saj zneski in viri niso bili razkriti zainteresiranim stranem.
The CCCME noted that the Commission based its analysis of macroeconomic data on actual data with respect to the complainants and supporting industry and estimates provided by the complainants for the rest of the Union industry.
Po končnem razkritju je CCCME ponovila svojo trditev.
It claimed that these estimates could not be considered as positive evidence as their amounts and sources had not been disclosed to interested parties.
Komisija je poudarila, da svoje analize industrije Unije ni razčlenila na pritožnike in subjekte, ki niso pritožniki, ter opozorila, da je zahtevala makroekonomske podatke od industrije Unije ter te podatke, ki jih je uporabila v preiskavi, dala zainteresiranim stranem na voljo v dokumentaciji za pregled.
Following final disclosure the CCCME reiterated its claim.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 32 začasne uredbe, je v prostorih pritožnikov preverila tudi vire in postopek, ki so ga uporabili za zbiranje podatkov za preostalo industrijo.
The Commission stressed that it did not break down its analysis of the Union industry into complainants versus non-complainants and noted that it had requested the macro economic data from the Union industry and had made this data which it has used in the investigation available in the file open for inspection by interested parties.
Poleg tega so preverjeni podatki vzorčenih družb zajemali precejšnji delež skupnih makroekonomskih podatkov, tj. 48 % celotnega obsega proizvodnje in 43 % celotne prodaje industrije Unije.
As specified in recital (32) of the provisional Regulation, it had also verified on-spot at the complainants' premises the sources and process followed by the latter for compiling the data for the rest of the industry.
Zato je Komisija trditev CCCME zavrnila.
In addition, the verified data coming from the sampled companies covered a significant part of the overall macroeconomic data, i.e. 48 % of the total production volume and 43 % of total sales of the Union industry.
Po končnem razkritju je FCI trdilo, da Komisija nasprotuje sama sebi, saj je v uvodni izjavi 132 začasne uredbe navedeno, da je Komisija ocenila makroekonomske kazalnike v zvezi z vsemi proizvajalci Unije.
Therefore, the Commission rejected the claim from the CCCME.
Vendar je v uvodni izjavi 131 zgoraj navedeno, da makroekonomski podatki temeljijo na preverjenih podatkih vzorčenih družb, ki zajemajo 48 % celotnega obsega proizvodnje in 43 % celotne prodaje industrije Unije.
Following final disclosure, FCI claimed that the Commission contradicts itself, because recital (132) of the provisional Regulation reports that the Commission evaluated macroeconomic indicators related to all Union producers.
Očitno je, da podatki, ki zajemajo manj kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje, niso reprezentativni za celotno industrijo Unije.
However, it is stated at recital (131) above that macroeconomic data are based on verified data coming from the sampled companies covering 48 % of the total production volume and 43 % of total sales of the Union industry.
Na podlagi navedenega ugotovitve Komisije v zvezi z makroekonomskimi kazalniki temeljijo na delnih in zavajajočih podatkih, na podlagi katerih ni mogoče ustrezno oceniti splošni položaj industrije Unije.
Clearly, data covering less than 50 % of the total output are not representative of the Union industry as a whole.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je preverila makroekonomske podatke v zvezi s celotno industrijo Unije v prostorih pritožnikov.
Based on the foregoing, the Commission's findings on macroeconomic indicators are based on partial and misleading data which do not permit a proper evaluation of the overall situation of the Union industry.
Poleg tega je Komisija temeljito preverila vzorčene družbe, ki zajemajo velik del obsega proizvodnje industrije Unije.
The Commission noted that it has verified the macroeconomic data regarding the whole Union industry on-spot at the complainants' premises.
Makroekonomski podatki torej ne temeljijo samo na vzorčenih družbah.
On top of this, the Commission verified profoundly the sampled companies, which cover a large part of the production volume of the Union industry.
FCI je trdilo še, da dejstvo, da je morala Komisija večkrat preveriti izvirne vire podatkov v prostorih odvetnikov pritožnikov, kaže, da so podatki o makroekonomskih kazalnikih problematični.
Thus the macroeconomic data is not solely based on the sampled companies.
Poleg tega so pritožniki predložili različne različice podatkov o makroekonomskih kazalnikih, in to vsakič z drugačnimi podatki.
Furthermore, FCI claimed that the data on macroeconomic indicators are problematic as shown by the fact that the Commission had to verify the original sources of the data at the premises of the complainants' lawyers on more than one occasion.
To dejstvo samo kaže, da je metodologija, ki so jo uporabili pritožniki, nepreklicno pomanjkljiva.
In addition, the complainants submitted different versions of the data on the macroeconomic indicators, every time with different figures.
Poleg tega je FCI navedlo, da so podatki, na katerih temeljijo ugotovitve Komisije, delni.
This fact alone shows that the methodology followed by the complainants is irremediably flawed.
Dejansko se podatki nanašajo samo na pritožnike in enega od dveh podpornikov.
In addition, FCI noted that the data on which the Commission's findings are based are partial.
Podatki skupno zajemajo manj kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
In fact, the data only refer to the complainants and only to one of the two supporters.
Po končnem razkritju so pritožniki pojasnili še, da so za pripravo podatkov uporabili podrobne odgovore na vprašalnik o podatkih o kazalnikih škode, ki so jih podpisali odgovorni uradniki v zadevnih družbah ter predložili pritožniki in eden od proizvajalcev, ki jih podpira, v pritožbi, pozneje pa so bili posodobljeni, da se je upoštevalo obdobje preiskave.
In total, the data account for less than 50 % of the total production of the like product in the Union.
Pritožniki so opravili ocene za podatke v zvezi z drugimi proizvajalci Unije na podlagi svojih informacij o trgu.
Following final disclosure, the complainants also clarified that to compile the data, they used detailed injury indicators data from questionnaire responses, signed by responsible officers within the companies in question, which were supplied by the complainants and one of the supporting producers in the complaint and subsequently brought up to date to cover the investigation period.
Ker zanesljivi podatki v zvezi z nekaterimi proizvajalci Unije niso bili na voljo, so pritožniki uporabili konservativen pristop, pri čemer so predpostavljali, da je v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju izkoriščenost zmogljivosti 100-odstotna, prodaja pa konstantna.
Estimates were made by complainants for the data concerning other Union producers based on their market intelligence.
Dejstvo, da so pritožniki med preiskavo posodobili makroekonomske podatke, ni imelo posledic za zanesljivost končnih podatkov, ki so jih pripravili.
In the absence of hard data regarding some of the Union producers complainants have taken a conservative approach, by assuming 100 % capacity utilisation and a constant sales figure across the period considered.
Komisija je končne podatke preverila in ugotovila, da so zanesljivi.