natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is therefore important to ensure that anonymous prepaid cards issued outside the Union can be used in the Union only where they can be considered to comply with requirements equivalent to those set out in Union law.
FIU imajo pomembno vlogo pri odkrivanju finančnih operacij terorističnih mrež, zlasti tistih čezmejne narave, in njihovih financerjev.
That rule should be enacted in full compliance with Union obligations in respect of international trade, especially the provisions of the General Agreement on Trade in Services.
Finančni obveščevalni podatki lahko bistveno prispevajo k odkrivanju omogočanja terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ter mrež in shem terorističnih organizacij.
FIUs play an important role in identifying the financial operations of terrorist networks, especially cross-border, and in detecting their financial backers.
Zaradi pomanjkanja predpisujočih mednarodnih standardov obstajajo pomembne razlike v funkcijah, pristojnostih in pooblastilih FIU.
Financial intelligence might be of fundamental importance in uncovering the facilitation of terrorist offences and the networks and schemes of terrorist organisations.
Države članice bi si morale prizadevati za zagotovitev učinkovitejšega in bolj usklajenega pristopa pri izvajanju finančnih preiskav v zvezi s terorizmom, tudi tistih, ki so povezane z zlorabo virtualnih valut.
Due to a lack of prescriptive international standards, FIUs maintain significant differences as regards their functions, competences and powers.
Sedanje razlike pa vseeno ne bi smele vplivati na dejavnost FIU, še posebej na njihovo zmožnost preventivnega analiziranja, kar zagotavlja podporo vsem organom, zadolženim za obveščevalne podatke, preiskovalne in pravosodne dejavnosti ter mednarodno sodelovanje.
Member States should endeavour to ensure a more efficient and coordinated approach to deal with financial investigations related to terrorism, including those related to the misuse of virtual currencies.
Pri opravljanju svojih nalog bi morale imeti FIU dostop do informacij in biti zmožne te informacije izmenjati brez ovir, vključno prek ustreznega sodelovanja z organi kazenskega pregona.
The current differences should however not affect an FIU’s activity, particularly its capacity to develop preventive analyses in support of all the authorities in charge of intelligence, investigative and judicial activities, and international cooperation.
V vseh primerih domnevne kriminalitete in zlasti v primerih, povezanih s financiranjem terorizma, bi moral biti pretok informacij neposreden, hiter ter brez nepotrebnega odlašanja.
In the exercise of their tasks, FIUs should have access to information and be able to exchange it without impediments, including through appropriate cooperation with law enforcement authorities.
Zato je bistveno, da se dodatno okrepita učinkovitost in uspešnost FIU s pojasnitvijo pooblastil in sodelovanja med različnimi FIU.
In all cases of suspected criminality and, in particular, in cases involving the financing of terrorism, information should flow directly and quickly without undue delays.
FIU bi morale biti zmožne od katerega koli pooblaščenega subjekta pridobiti vse potrebne informacije o njihovih funkcijah.
It is therefore essential to further enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of FIUs, by clarifying the powers of and cooperation between FIUs.
Njihov neomejen dostop do informacij je bistven, saj zagotavlja ustrezno sledenje tokom denarja ter zgodnje odkrivanje nezakonitih mrež in tokov.
FIUs should be able to obtain from any obliged entity all the necessary information relating to their functions.
Potreba FIU po pridobitvi dodatnih informacij od pooblaščenih subjektov na podlagi suma pranja denarja ali financiranja terorizma bi lahko temeljila bodisi na predhodnem poročilu o sumljivi transakciji, predloženem FIU, bodisi na drugih sredstvih, kot so lastna analiza FIU oziroma obveščevalni podatki, ki jih priskrbijo pristojni organi, ali informacije, ki jih ima druga FIU.
Their unfettered access to information is essential to ensure that flows of money can be properly traced and illicit networks and flows detected at an early stage.
FIU bi morale zato v okviru svojih nalog biti zmožne pridobiti informacije od katerega koli pooblaščenega subjekta, četudi posamezni pooblaščeni subjekt predhodno ni predložil poročila.
The need for FIUs to obtain additional information from obliged entities based on a suspicion of money laundering or financing of terrorism might be triggered by a prior suspicious transaction report reported to the FIU, but might also be triggered through other means such as the FIU’s own analysis, intelligence provided by competent authorities or information held by another FIU.
To ne vključuje vsesplošnih zahtev za informacije pooblaščenim subjektom v okviru analize FIU, temveč samo zahteve za informacije, ki temeljijo na dovolj opredeljenih pogojih.
FIUs should therefore in the context of their functions be able to obtain information from any obliged entity, even without a prior report being made.
FIU bi morale prav tako biti zmožne pridobiti take informacije na podlagi zahteve druge FIU v Uniji ter izmenjati informacije s FIU, ki informacije zahteva.
This does not include indiscriminate requests for information to the obliged entities in the context of the FIU's analysis, but only information requests based on sufficiently defined conditions.
Namen FIU je zbiranje in analiza informacij, ki jih prejmejo, da ugotovijo povezavo med sumljivimi transakcijami in kriminalno dejavnostjo, na kateri temeljijo, da preprečijo pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma in se borijo proti njima ter da pristojnim organom posredujejo rezultate svoje analize in dodatne informacije, kadar obstajajo razlogi za sum glede pranja denarja, povezanih predhodnih kaznivih dejanj ali financiranja terorizma.
An FIU should also be able to obtain such information on a request made by another Union FIU and to exchange the information with the requesting FIU.
FIU ne bi smela neizvesti ali zavrniti izmenjave informacij z drugo FIU, na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo, na primer zaradi neugotovljenega povezanega predhodnega kaznivega dejanja, značilnosti nacionalnega kazenskega prava in razlik med opredelitvami povezanih predhodnih kaznivih dejanj ali ker ni navedbe določenih povezanih predhodnih kaznivih dejanj.
The purpose of the FIU is to collect and analyse the information which they receive with the aim of establishing links between suspicious transactions and underlying criminal activity in order to prevent and combat money laundering and terrorist financing, and to disseminate the results of its analysis as well as additional information to the competent authorities where there are grounds to suspect money laundering, associated predicate offences or financing of terrorism.
Da se omogoči učinkovito širjenje informacij, bi morala FIU podobno podati svoje predhodno soglasje za posredovanje informacij pristojnim organom drugi FIU, ne glede na vrsto morebitnega povezanega predhodnega kaznivega dejanja.
An FIU should not refrain from or refuse the exchange of information to another FIU, spontaneously or upon request, for reasons such as a lack of identification of an associated predicate offence, features of criminal national laws and differences between the definitions of associated predicate offences or the absence of a reference to particular associated predicate offences.
FIU poročajo o težavah pri izmenjavi informacij zaradi razlik med nacionalnimi opredelitvami določenih predhodnih kaznivih dejanj, kot so davčna kazniva dejanja, ki niso harmonizirana s pravom Unije.
Similarly, an FIU should grant its prior consent to another FIU to forward the information to competent authorities regardless of the type of possible associated predicate offence in order to allow the dissemination function to be carried out effectively.
Take razlike ne bi smele ovirati vzajemne izmenjave teh informacij, njihovega posredovanja pristojnim organom in njihove uporabe, kakor je določeno v tej direktivi.
FIUs have reported difficulties in exchanging information based on differences in national definitions of certain predicate offences, such as tax crimes, which are not harmonised by Union law.
FIU bi morale hitro, konstruktivno in učinkovito zagotoviti čim širše mednarodno sodelovanje s FIU tretjih držav na področju pranja denarja, povezanih predhodnih kaznivih dejanj in financiranja terorizma v skladu s priporočili FATF in načeli skupine Egmont za izmenjavo informacij med finančnimi obveščevalnimi enotami.
Such differences, should not hamper the mutual exchange, the dissemination to competent authorities and the use of that information as defined by this Directive.
Bonitetne informacije v zvezi s kreditnimi in finančnimi institucijami, kot so informacije o ustreznosti in primernosti direktorjev ter delničarjev, mehanizmih notranjega nadzora, upravljanju ali skladnosti ter obvladovanju tveganj, so pogosto nepogrešljive za ustrezni nadzor na področju AML/CFT nad temi institucijami.
FIUs should rapidly, constructively and effectively ensure the widest range of international cooperation with third countries’ FIUs in relation to money laundering, associated predicate offences and terrorist financing in accordance with the FATF Recommendations and Egmont Principles for Information Exchange between Financial Intelligence Units.
Podobno pa so tudi informacije v zvezi z AML/CFT pomembne za bonitetni nadzor nad temi institucijami.
Information of a prudential nature relating to credit and financial institutions, such as information relating to the fitness and properness of directors and shareholders, to the internal control mechanisms, to governance or to compliance and risk management, is often indispensable for the adequate AML/CFT supervision of such institutions.
Zato se izmenjave zaupnih informacij in sodelovanja med pristojnimi organi na področju AML/CFT, ki nadzorujejo kreditne in finančne institucije, ter bonitetnimi nadzorniki ne bi smelo ovirati s pravno negotovostjo, ki se lahko pojavi zaradi izostanka jasnih določb na tem področju.
Similarly, AML/CFT information is also important for the prudential supervision of such institutions.
Pojasnitev pravnega okvira je še toliko pomembnejša, ker bonitetni nadzor v številnih primerih izvajajo nadzorniki, ki se ne ukvarjajo s področjem AML/CFT, kot je Evropska centralna banka (ECB).
Therefore, the exchange of confidential information and collaboration between AML/CFT competent authorities supervising credit and financial institutions and prudential supervisors should not be hampered by legal uncertainty which might arise as a result of the absence of explicit provisions in this field.
Odložen dostop FIU in drugih pristojnih organov do informacij o identiteti imetnikov bančnih in plačilnih računov ter sefov, zlasti anonimnih, ovira odkrivanje prenosov sredstev, povezanih s terorizmom.
Clarification of the legal framework is even more important since prudential supervision has, in a number of cases, been entrusted to non-AML/CFT supervisors, such as the European Central Bank (ECB).
Nacionalni podatki, ki omogočajo identifikacijo bančnih in plačilnih računov ter sefov, ki pripadajo eni osebi, so razdrobljeni in zato FIU ter drugim pristojnim organom niso pravočasno dostopni.
Delayed access to information by FIUs and other competent authorities on the identity of holders of bank and payment accounts and safe-deposit boxes, especially anonymous ones, hampers the detection of transfers of funds relating to terrorism.
Zato je bistveno, da se v vseh državah članicah vzpostavijo centralizirani avtomatizirani mehanizmi, kot so registri ali sistemi za pridobivanje podatkov, ki bi učinkovito omogočali pravočasen dostop do informacij o identiteti imetnikov bančnih in plačilnih računov ter sefov, njihovih pooblaščencih in dejanskih lastnikih.
National data allowing the identification of bank and payments accounts and safe-deposit boxes belonging to one person is fragmented and therefore not accessible to FIUs and to other competent authorities in a timely manner.
Ko se izvajajo določbe o dostopu, je primerno uporabiti že obstoječe mehanizme, pod pogojem, da lahko nacionalne FIU takoj in nefiltrirano dostopajo do podatkov, o katerih poizvedujejo.
It is therefore essential to establish centralised automated mechanisms, such as a register or data retrieval system, in all Member States as an efficient means to get timely access to information on the identity of holders of bank and payment accounts and safe-deposit boxes, their proxy holders, and their beneficial owners.
Države članice bi morale razmisliti o vnašanju drugih informacij, ki jih štejejo za potrebne in sorazmerne za učinkovitejšo blažitev tveganja v zvezi s pranjem denarja in financiranja terorizma, v take mehanizme.
When applying the access provisions, it is appropriate for pre-existing mechanisms to be used provided that national FIUs can access the data for which they make inquiries in an immediate and unfiltered manner.
FIU in pristojni organi, ki niso organi pregona, bi morali zagotoviti popolno zaupnost glede takšnih poizvedb in zahtev v zvezi z zadevnimi informacijami.
Member States should consider feeding such mechanisms with other information deemed necessary and proportionate for the more effective mitigation of risks relating to money laundering and the financing of terrorism.
Da se zagotovi spoštovanje zasebnosti in varstvo osebnih podatkov, bi morali biti v centraliziranih avtomatiziranih mehanizmih za bančne in plačilne račune, kot so registri ali sistemi za pridobivanje podatkov, shranjeni vsaj podatki, ki so potrebni za izvajanje preiskav AML/CFT.
Full confidentiality should be ensured in respect of such inquiries and requests for related information by FIUs and competent authorities other than those authorities responsible for prosecution.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost določiti, katere podatke je koristno in sorazmerno zbirati, ob upoštevanju obstoječih sistemov in pravnih tradicij, da bi se omogočila smiselna identifikacija dejanskih lastnikov.
In order to respect privacy and protect personal data, the minimum data necessary for the carrying out of AML/CFT investigations should be held in centralised automated mechanisms for bank and payment accounts, such as registers or data retrieval systems.
Ob prenosu določb, povezanih s temi mehanizmi, bi morale države članice opredeliti obdobja hrambe, enaka obdobju hrambe dokumentacije in informacij, pridobljenih v okviru izvajanja ukrepov skrbnega preverjanja strank.
It should be possible for Member States to determine which data it is useful and proportionate to gather, taking into account the systems and legal traditions in place to enable the meaningful identification of the beneficial owners.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost splošnega podaljšanja obdobja hrambe na podlagi zakona, ne da bi jim bilo treba sprejemati odločitve za posamezne primere.
When transposing the provisions relating to those mechanisms, Member States should set out retention periods equivalent to the period for retention of the documentation and information obtained within the application of customer due diligence measures.
Dodatno obdobje hrambe ne bi smelo presegati dodatnih petih let.
It should be possible for Member States to extend the retention period on a general basis by law, without requiring case-by-case decisions.
To obdobje ne bi smelo vplivati na nacionalno pravo, ki določa drugačne zahteve glede hrambe podatkov, ki omogočajo odločitve za posamezne primere, da se olajša potek kazenskih ali upravnih postopkov.
The additional retention period should not exceed an additional five years.
Dostop do teh mehanizmov bi moral temeljiti na potrebi po seznanitvi.
That period should be without prejudice to national law setting out other data retention requirements allowing case-by-case decisions to facilitate criminal or administrative proceedings.
Točna identifikacija in preverjanje podatkov fizičnih in pravnih oseb sta za boj proti pranju denarja ali financiranju terorizma bistvenega pomena.
Access to those mechanisms should be on a need-to-know basis.
Najnovejši tehnološki napredki na področju digitalizacije transakcij in plačil omogočajo varno identifikacijo na daljavo ali elektronsko identifikacijo.
Accurate identification and verification of data of natural and legal persons are essential for fighting money laundering or terrorist financing.
Ta sredstva za identifikacijo, kot so opredeljena v Uredbi (EU) št. 910/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, bi se morala upoštevati, zlasti v zvezi s priglašenimi shemami elektronske identifikacije ter sredstvi za zagotavljanje čezmejnega pravnega priznavanja, ki ponujajo izjemno varna orodja in predstavljajo merilo, na podlagi katerega se lahko preverijo metode identifikacije, vzpostavljene na nacionalni ravni.
The latest technical developments in the digitalisation of transactions and payments enable a secure remote or electronic identification.
Poleg tega bi se lahko upoštevali drugi postopki za varno identifikacijo na daljavo ali elektronsko identifikacijo, ki jih na nacionalni ravni urejajo, priznajo, odobrijo ali sprejmejo pristojni nacionalni organi.
Those means of identification as set out in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council should be taken into account, in particular with regard to notified electronic identification schemes and ways of ensuring cross-border legal recognition, which offer high level secure tools and provide a benchmark against which the identification methods set up at national level may be checked.
Kadar je primerno, bi bilo treba v postopku identifikacije upoštevati tudi priznavanje elektronskih dokumentov in storitev zaupanja, kot je določeno v Uredbi (EU) št. 910/2014.
In addition, other secure remote or electronic identification processes, regulated, recognised, approved or accepted at national level by the national competent authority may be taken into account.
Pri uporabi te direktive bi bilo treba upoštevati načelo tehnološke nevtralnosti.
Where appropriate, the recognition of electronic documents and trust services as set out in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 should also be taken into account in the identification process.
Za identifikacijo politično izpostavljenih oseb v Uniji bi države članice morale izdati sezname z navedbo specifičnih funkcij, ki v skladu z nacionalnimi zakoni in drugimi predpisi štejejo kot pomembne javne funkcije.
The principle of technology neutrality should be taken into account in the application of this Directive.
Države članice bi morale od vsake mednarodne organizacije, ki je akreditirana na njihovem ozemlju, zahtevati, da izda in posodablja seznam pomembnih javnih funkcij pri tej mednarodni organizaciji.
In order to identify politically exposed persons in the Union, lists should be issued by Member States indicating the specific functions which, in accordance with national laws, regulations and administrative provisions, qualify as prominent public functions.
Pristop k preverjanju obstoječih strank v trenutnem okviru izhaja iz pristopa, ki temelji na oceni tveganja.
Member States should request each international organisation accredited on their territories to issue and keep up to date a list of prominent public functions at that international organisation.
Vendar pa v zvezi z večjimi tveganji pranja denarja, financiranja terorizma in povezanih predhodnih kaznivih dejanj, povezanih z določenimi posredniškimi strukturami, ta pristop morda ne omogoča pravočasnega odkrivanja in ocene tveganj.
The approach for the review of existing customers in the current framework is risk-based.
Zato je pomembno zagotoviti, da se nekatere jasno opredeljene kategorije že obstoječih strank prav tako redno spremljajo.
However, given the higher risk of money laundering, terrorist financing and associated predicate offences associated with certain intermediary structures, that approach might not allow for the timely detection and assessment of risks.
Od držav članic se trenutno zahteva, da zagotovijo, da gospodarski in drugi pravni subjekti, ustanovljeni na njihovem ozemlju, pridobijo ter imajo na voljo ustrezne, natančne in posodobljene informacije o svojem dejanskem lastništvu.
It is therefore important to ensure that certain clearly specified categories of existing customers are also monitored on a regular basis.
Potreba po natančnih in posodobljenih informacijah o dejanskem lastniku je ključni dejavnik pri iskanju storilcev kaznivih dejanj, ki bi svojo identiteto sicer lahko skrili za gospodarsko strukturo.
Member States are currently required to ensure that corporate and other legal entities incorporated within their territory obtain and hold adequate, accurate and current information on their beneficial ownership.
Globalno povezani finančni sistem omogoča prikrivanje in prenašanje sredstev po celem svetu in osebe, ki se ukvarjajo s pranjem denarja, financerji terorizma ter drugi storilci kaznivih dejanj to vse bolj izkoriščajo.
The need for accurate and up-to-date information on the beneficial owner is a key factor in tracing criminals who might otherwise be able to hide their identity behind a corporate structure.
Potrebno bi bilo pojasniti posebni dejavnik, ki določa državo članico, ki je odgovorna za spremljanje in registracijo informacij o dejanskem lastništvu skladov in podobnih pravnih ureditev.
The globally interconnected financial system makes it possible to hide and move funds around the world, and money launderers and terrorist financers as well as other criminals have increasingly made use of that possibility.
Zaradi razlik v pravnih sistemih držav članic se nekaterih skladov in podobnih pravnih ureditev ne spremlja ali niso registrirani nikjer v Uniji.
The specific factor determining which Member State is responsible for the monitoring and registration of beneficial ownership information of trusts and similar legal arrangements should be clarified.
Informacije o dejanskem lastništvu skladov in podobnih pravnih ureditev se registrirajo tam, kjer imajo sedež ali kjer prebivajo skrbniki skladov in osebe z enakovrednim položajem v podobnih pravnih ureditvah.
Due to differences in the legal systems of Member States, certain trusts and similar legal arrangements are not monitored or registered anywhere in the Union.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega spremljanja in registracije informacij o dejanskem lastništvu skladov in podobnih pravnih ureditev je potrebno tudi sodelovanje med državami članicami.
Beneficial ownership information of trusts and similar legal arrangements should be registered where the trustees of trusts and persons holding equivalent positions in similar legal arrangements are established or where they reside.
Povezanost registrov dejanskih lastnikov skladov in podobnih pravnih ureditev držav članic bi omogočila dostopnost teh informacij, pa tudi zagotovila, da bi se izognili večkratnim registracijam istih skladov in podobnih pravnih ureditev v Uniji.
In order to ensure the effective monitoring and registration of information on the beneficial ownership of trusts and similar legal arrangements, cooperation between Member States is also necessary.
Pravila, ki se uporabljajo za sklade in podobne pravne ureditve v zvezi z dostopom do informacij o dejanskem lastništvu, bi morala biti primerljiva z ustreznimi pravili, ki se uporabljajo za gospodarske in druge pravne subjekte.
The interconnection of Member States’ registries of beneficial owners of trusts and similar legal arrangements would make this information accessible, and would also ensure that the multiple registration of the same trusts and similar legal arrangements is avoided within the Union.
Zaradi velikega števila različnih vrst skladov, ki trenutno obstajajo v Uniji, ter še bolj raznovrstnih podobnih pravnih ureditev bi morale države članice sprejeti odločitev o tem, ali je sklad ali podobna pravna ureditev primerljivo podobna gospodarskim in drugim pravnim subjektom ali ne.