natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is appropriate to allow Member States or regions to use an alternative method for carrying out checks by using systematically these or similar data and processing them in an automated way as well as following up cases where the automated processing of data leads to inconclusive results, without compromising the system's performance in delivering the required level of assurance on the legality and regularity of expenditure (hereinafter referred to as ‘monitoring’).
Primerno je, da se državam članicam ali regijam omogoči uporaba alternativne metode za opravljanje pregledov s sistematično uporabo teh ali podobnih podatkov in njihovo avtomatizirano obdelavo ter spremljanje primerov, pri katerih avtomatizirana obdelava podatkov vodi do neprepričljivih rezultatov, ne da bi se pri tem ogrozila uspešnost sistema pri zagotavljanju zahtevane ravni zanesljivosti v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo izdatkov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: spremljanje).
A legal framework should therefore be provided to set out the conditions under which checks by monitoring in a Member State or a region can substitute the area-related on-the-spot checks.
Zato bi bilo treba zagotoviti pravni okvir, ki določa pogoje, pod katerimi lahko pregledi s spremljanjem v državi članici ali regiji nadomestijo preglede na kraju samem v zvezi s površino.
When checks by monitoring allow the competent authority to conclude if the administrative penalty set out in Article 19a(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 has to be applied, it should be provided that the follow-up on-the-spot check in accordance with Article 33a of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 is not necessary.
Kadar lahko pristojni organ s pregledi s spremljanjem ugotovi, ali je treba uporabiti upravno kazen iz člena 19a(3) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 640/2014, bi bilo treba določiti, da nadaljnji pregled na kraju samem v skladu s členom 33a Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014 ni potreben.
Taking into account the initial investment needed by the competent authorities to substitute the current on-the-spot checks method with checks by monitoring, it is appropriate to provide for a certain flexibility, allowing that checks by monitoring are carried out only for certain aid schemes, support measures or types of operations, and to provide for the possibility to phase-in checks by monitoring of a certain aid scheme or support measure.
Ob upoštevanju začetne naložbe, ki jo pristojni organi potrebujejo za zamenjavo trenutne metode pregledov na kraju samem s pregledi s spremljanjem, je primerno zagotoviti določeno prožnost, ki omogoča, da se pregledi s spremljanjem opravljajo le za nekatere sheme pomoči, podporne ukrepe ali vrste operacij, in omogočiti postopno uvedbo pregledov s spremljanjem za določeno shemo pomoči ali podporni ukrep.
During the phasing-in period, which should be limited in time to ensure equal treatment of beneficiaries, new provisions should ensure that Member States or regions gradually extend their use of checks by monitoring to the whole area covered by the aid scheme or support measure.
V obdobju postopnega uvajanja, ki bi moralo biti zaradi enake obravnave upravičencev časovno omejeno, bi morale nove določbe zagotoviti, da države članice ali regije uporabo pregledov s spremljanjem postopno razširijo na celotno površino, zajeto s shemo pomoči ali podpornim ukrepom.
Such an approach will allow Member States or regions to prepare for a full implementation of monitoring and fine-tune the follow-up procedures and IT tools used to analyse data.
Tak pristop bo državam članicam ali regijam omogočil, da se pripravijo na polno izvajanje spremljanja ter podrobneje določijo postopke spremljanja in informacijska orodja, ki se uporabljajo za analizo podatkov.
Where checks by monitoring are limited to areas chosen on the basis of clearly defined, objective and non-discriminatory criteria, all beneficiaries in those areas should be subject to checks by monitoring.
Kadar so pregledi s spremljanjem omejeni na območja, izbrana na podlagi jasno opredeljenih, objektivnih in nediskriminacijskih meril, bi morali biti vsi upravičenci na teh območjih predmet pregledov s spremljanjem.
It is appropriate to set a minimum control rate in order to ensure that the checks on compliance with the eligibility conditions, requirements and other obligations are satisfactory in circumstances where data provided by Copernicus Sentinels satellites are not relevant.
Za zagotovitev, da so pregledi skladnosti z merili za upravičenost, zahtevami in drugimi obveznostmi zadovoljivi v okoliščinah, ko podatki, pridobljeni s sateliti Sentinel programa Copernicus, niso ustrezni, je primerno določiti najmanjšo stopnjo kontrole.
Physical inspections in the field should only be necessary if evidence collected using new technologies such as geo-tagged photos and Unmanned Aircraft Systems or relevant documentary evidence does not lead to a conclusive result or if the competent authorities anticipate that none of these types of evidence will be effective in checking compliance with the eligibility conditions, requirements and other obligations that cannot be monitored.
Pregledi na terenu bi morali biti potrebni le, če dokazi, ki so bili zbrani z uporabo novih tehnologij, kot so geografsko označene (geo-tagged) fotografije in brezpilotni zrakoplovni sistemi, ali ustrezna dokumentarna dokazila ne vodijo do prepričljivega rezultata ali če pristojni organi predvidevajo, da nobena od teh vrst dokazov ne bo učinkovita pri preverjanju skladnosti z merili za upravičenost, zahtevami in drugimi obveznostmi, ki jih ni mogoče spremljati.
The results of the automated analysis of Copernicus Sentinels satellites data or similar data can be a tool to assist beneficiaries in respecting requirements.
Rezultati avtomatizirane analize podatkov satelitov Sentinel programa Copernicus ali podobnih podatkov so lahko orodje za pomoč upravičencem pri izpolnjevanju zahtev.
Warning alerts about possible non-compliance should be communicated to beneficiaries and national authorities should be required to set up appropriate tools for that purpose.
Opozorila glede morebitne neskladnosti bi bilo treba posredovati upravičencem, od nacionalnih organov pa bi bilo treba zahtevati, da za ta namen vzpostavijo ustrezna orodja.
It is appropriate to provide that communication with beneficiaries on these results is not considered as a notice to the beneficiary of the intention of the competent authority to carry out an on-the-spot check.
Primerno je določiti, da se komunikacija z upravičenci o teh rezultatih ne šteje za obvestilo upravičencu o nameri pristojnega organa, da opravi pregled na kraju samem.
Beneficiaries should also be given the possibility to modify their aid applications or payment claims so as to correct their declaration on the use of agricultural areas, provided that the requirements in question have been complied with.
Upravičenci bi tudi morali imeti možnost, da spremenijo svoje vloge za pomoč ali zahtevke za plačilo, da popravijo svojo izjavo o uporabi kmetijskih površin, pod pogojem, da so se zadevne zahteve upoštevale.
It is also appropriate to allow Member States to set a deadline by which these modifications can be accepted.
Prav tako je primerno državam članicam omogočiti, da določijo rok, do katerega se lahko te spremembe sprejmejo.
It is appropriate to clarify that applications or applicants found not to be admissible or not eligible for payment at the time of the on-the-spot check should not be part of the control population from which samples are drawn to fulfil the minimum control rates.
Primerno je pojasniti, da vloge ali prosilci, za katere se ob pregledu na kraju samem ugotovi, da niso dopustne oziroma da niso upravičeni do plačila, ne bi smeli biti del kontrolne populacije, iz katere se pridobijo vzorci za izpolnitev najmanjših stopenj kontrol.
It should also be provided that these applications or data concerning these applicants should be used for cross-checks so as to detect double claims in admissible applications and information relevant for the update of the land parcel identification system.
Določiti bi bilo treba tudi, da bi bilo treba te vloge ali podatke v zvezi s temi prosilci uporabiti za navzkrižna preverjanja, da se odkrije podvajanje zahtevkov v dopustnih vlogah in informacij, pomembnih za posodobitev identifikacijskega sistema za zemljišča.
To clarify the scope of on-the-spot checks concerning the obligation to reconvert in cases of non-respect of the obligation on environmentally sensitive permanent grassland areas, it is appropriate to provide that the on-the-spot checks should be carried out on parcels that have to be reconverted so as to check if the reconversion obligation has been respected.
Da bi se pojasnil obseg pregledov na kraju samem v zvezi z obveznostjo glede ponovne spremembe v primerih neupoštevanja obveznosti na okoljsko občutljivih površinah s trajnim travinjem, je primerno določiti, da bi bilo treba preglede na kraju samem opraviti na parcelah, ki jih je treba ponovno spremeniti, da se preveri, ali je bila obveznost glede ponovne spremembe izpolnjena.
To allow Member States to optimise their sample selection, it is appropriate to provide for more flexibility in selecting the control samples as laid down in Articles 30 to 33 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014.
Da bi se državam članicam omogočila optimizacija njihovega izbora vzorca, je primerno zagotoviti večjo prožnost pri izbiri kontrolnih vzorcev, kot je določeno v členih od 30 do 33 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014.
The mandatory selection method should be replaced by general principles on how samples can be combined.
Obvezno metodo izbora bi bilo treba nadomestiti s splošnimi načeli o tem, kako se lahko vzorci kombinirajo.
Furthermore, to obtain a representative error rate, a minimum random sample for each of the aid schemes and support measures should be provided.
Da se pridobi reprezentativna stopnja napake, bi bilo tudi treba zagotoviti najmanjši naključni vzorec za vsako shemo pomoči in podporni ukrep.
To keep the risk-based approach for checks of the greening payment, it is also appropriate to define the selection method for the relevant control samples.
Da bi se ohranil pristop na podlagi tveganja za preglede za plačilo za zeleno komponento, je primerno tudi opredeliti metodo izbora za zadevne kontrolne vzorce.
In order to facilitate the implementation of the integrated system and to reduce the time of carrying out controls, the possibility to limit checks concerning area measurement to a random sample of 50 % of the agricultural parcels declared should be extended to also cover checks concerning eligibility.
Za olajšanje izvajanja integriranega sistema in skrajšanje časa, potrebnega za opravljanje kontrol, bi bilo treba možnost, da se pregledi v zvezi z meritvijo površine omejijo na naključnih 50 % prijavljenih kmetijskih parcel, razširiti tudi na preglede v zvezi z upravičenostjo.
For the purposes of monitoring the implementation of the checks by monitoring, a notification obligation for Member States should be provided.
Za namene spremljanja izvajanja pregledov s spremljanjem bi bilo treba za države članice določiti obveznost uradnega obveščanja.
To allow Member States to use new technologies in their integrated administration and control systems as soon as possible, the new rules on single applications and payment claims and checks should apply as of claim year 2018.
Da bi se državam članicam omogočilo, da v svojih integriranih administrativnih in kontrolnih sistemih začnejo čim prej uporabljati nove tehnologije, bi morala nova pravila o zbirnih vlogah in zahtevkih za plačilo ter pregledih veljati od leta zahtevkov 2018.
This Regulation should therefore enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Zato bi bilo treba za začetek veljavnosti te uredbe določiti dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Direct Payments and the Rural Development Committee,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za neposredna plačila in Odbora za razvoj podeželja –
the following paragraph 1b is inserted:
vstavi se odstavek 1b:
Where checks by monitoring are carried out in accordance with Article 40a, beneficiaries may modify the single application or payment claim regarding the use of individual agricultural parcels provided that the requirements under the direct payment schemes or rural development measures concerned are respected.’;
Kadar se v skladu s členom 40a opravijo pregledi s spremljanjem, lahko upravičenci spremenijo zbirno vlogo ali zahtevek za plačilo glede uporabe posameznih kmetijskih parcel, pod pogojem, da se upoštevajo zahteve v okviru zadevnih shem neposrednih plačil ali ukrepov za razvoj podeželja.“;
Modifications following the preliminary checks made in accordance with paragraph 1a shall be notified to the competent authority at the latest nine calendar days after the final date for notification of the results of the preliminary checks referred to in Article 11(4) to the beneficiary.
Spremembe po predhodnih preverjanjih, opravljene v skladu z odstavkom 1a, se pošljejo pristojnemu organu najpozneje devet koledarskih dni po končnem roku za sporočanje rezultatov predhodnih preverjanj iz člena 11(4) upravičencu.
Such notifications shall be made in writing or via the geo-spatial aid application form.’;
Takšno sporočanje je pisno ali prek geoprostorskega obrazca vloge za pomoč.“;
Modifications made in accordance with paragraph 1b shall be notified to the competent authority by the date fixed by that competent authority.
Spremembe v skladu z odstavkom 1b se pristojnemu organu sporočijo do datuma, ki ga določi navedeni pristojni organ.
The date shall be at least 15 calendar days before the date when the payment of the first instalment or the advanced payment is to be made to beneficiaries in accordance with Article 75 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.
Ta datum je vsaj 15 koledarskih dni pred datumom, na katerega se upravičencem plača prvi obrok ali predplačilo v skladu s členom 75 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013.
in paragraph 3, the following second subparagraph is added:
v odstavku 3 se doda naslednji drugi pododstavek:
‘For the purposes of the first subparagraph, the obligation provided in point (d) of Article 40a(1) shall not be considered as a notice to the beneficiary of a competent authority's intention to carry out an on-the-spot check.’;
„Za namene prvega pododstavka se obveznost iz člena 40a(1)(d) ne šteje za obvestilo upravičencu o nameri pristojnega organa, da opravi pregled na kraju samem.“;
in Article 24, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
v členu 24 se odstavek 4 nadomesti z naslednjim:
The competent authority shall carry out physical inspections in the field in the event that photo-interpretation of satellite or aerial ortho-images or other relevant evidence including evidence provided by the beneficiary at the request of the competent authority do not provide results that would permit definitive conclusions to be drawn to the satisfaction of the competent authority concerning the eligibility or, where applicable, the correct size of the area that is the subject of administrative or on-the-spot checks.’;
Pristojni organ opravi preglede na terenu, če fotointerpretacija satelitskih ortofoto posnetkov ali ortofoto posnetkov iz zraka ali drugi ustrezni dokazi, vključno z dokazi, ki jih upravičenec predloži na zahtevo pristojnega organa, ne zagotovijo rezultatov, ki bi omogočali dokončne ugotovitve v skladu z zahtevami pristojnega organa v zvezi z upravičenostjo ali, kjer je primerno, pravilno velikostjo površine, ki je predmet upravnega pregleda ali pregleda na kraju samem.“;
in Article 29(1), the following third subparagraph is added:
v členu 29(1) se doda naslednji tretji pododstavek:
‘Data from applications or concerning applicants found not to be admissible or not eligible for payment as referred to in Article 34(1) shall be used for the purposes of points (a), (c) and (e) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph.’;
„Podatki iz vlog ali v zvezi s prosilci iz člena 34(1), za katere se ugotovi, da niso dopustne oziroma da niso upravičeni do plačila, se uporabijo za namene iz točk (a), (c) in (e) prvega pododstavka tega odstavka.“;
in Article 31(1), point (g) is replaced by the following:
v členu 31(1) se točka (g) nadomesti z naslednjim:
100 % of all parcels on which an obligation to re-convert land into land under permanent grassland according to Article 42 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 applies;’;
100 % vseh parcel, na katerih velja obveznost ponovne spremembe zemljišča v zemljišče s trajnim travinjem v skladu s členom 42 Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 639/2014;“;
in Article 33a, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
v členu 33a se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
The follow-up on-the-spot check referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be necessary where the over-declaration identified has led to an up-date of the reference parcels concerned in the identification system for agricultural parcels as referred to in Article 5 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 in the year of the finding or where checks by monitoring as referred to in Article 40a of this Regulation are carried out for the aid scheme or support measure in question in the following claim year and allow the competent authority to conclude whether the administrative penalty set out in Article 19a(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 shall be applied.’;
Nadaljnji pregled na kraju samem iz odstavka 1 ni potreben, če je ugotovljena čezmerna prijava vodila do posodobitve zadevnih referenčnih parcel v identifikacijskem sistemu za kmetijske parcele iz člena 5 Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 640/2014 v letu ugotovitve ali če se pregledi s spremljanjem iz člena 40a te uredbe za zadevno shemo pomoči ali podporni ukrep opravijo v naslednjem letu zahtevkov in pristojnemu organu omogočajo, da ugotovi, ali je treba uporabiti upravno kazen iz člena 19a(3) Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 640/2014.“;
Applications or applicants found not to be admissible or not eligible for payment at the time of submission or after administrative or on-the-spot checks shall not form part of the control population.”
Vloge ali prosilci, za katere se ob predložitvi ali po upravnih pregledih ali pregledih na kraju samem ugotovi, da niso dopustne oziroma da niso upravičeni do plačila, niso del kontrolne populacije.‘
For the purposes of Articles 30 and 31, the sample selection shall ensure that:
Za namene členov 30 in 31 se pri izboru vzorca zagotovi, da se:
between 1 % and 1,25 % of the control population referred to in points (a) to (f) and (h) of Article 30 and in points (a), (c), (d) and (e) of Article 31(1) shall be selected randomly;
od 1 % do 1,25 % kontrolne populacije iz točk od (a) do (f) in (h) člena 30 ter točk (a), (c), (d) in (e) člena 31(1) izbere naključno;
between 0,6 % and 0,75 % of the control population referred to in point (b) of Article 31(1) shall be selected randomly;
od 0,6 % do 0,75 % kontrolne populacije iz člena 31(1)(b) izbere naključno;
between 4 % and 5 % of the control population referred to in point (h) of Article 31(1) shall be selected randomly;
od 4 % do 5 % kontrolne populacije iz člena 31(1)(h) izbere naključno;
the remaining number of beneficiaries in the control sample referred to in points (a) to (e) and (h) of Article 31(1) shall be selected on the basis of a risk analysis.
preostalo število upravičencev v kontrolnem vzorcu iz točk od (a) do (e) in (h) člena 31(1) izbere na podlagi analize tveganja.
For the purposes of Article 31, Member States shall ensure representativeness of the control sample as regards the different practices.
Države članice za namene člena 31 za različne prakse zagotovijo reprezentativnost kontrolnega vzorca.
The additional beneficiaries to be subject to on-the-spot checks for the purposes of the first subparagraph of Article 31(3) shall be selected on the basis of a risk analysis.
Dodatni upravičenci, pri katerih se opravijo pregledi na kraju samem za namene prvega pododstavka člena 31(3), se izberejo na podlagi analize tveganja.
For the purposes of Articles 32 and 33, between 20 % and 25 % of the minimum number of beneficiaries to be subject to on-the-spot checks and, where Article 32(2a) applies, 100 % of the collectives and between 20 % and 25 % of the commitments to be subject to on-the-spot checks shall be selected randomly.
Za namene členov 32 in 33 se od 20 % do 25 % minimalnega števila upravičencev, pri katerih se opravijo pregledi na kraju samem, in, kadar se uporablja člen 32(2a), 100 % kolektivov in med 20 % in 25 % obveznosti, ki bodo predmet pregledov na kraju samem, izbere naključno.
The remaining number of beneficiaries and commitments to be subject to on-the-spot checks shall be selected on the basis of a risk analysis.
Preostalo število upravičencev in obveznosti, ki bodo predmet pregledov na kraju samem, se izbere na podlagi analize tveganja.
For the purposes of Articles 32 and 33, the random part of the sample may also include either the beneficiaries already randomly selected in accordance with points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 or the additional beneficiaries selected randomly in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 26(4) or both.
Za namene členov 32 in 33 lahko naključni del vzorca vključuje tudi že naključno izbrane upravičence v skladu s točkami (a), (b) in (c) odstavka 2 ali dodatne upravičence, izbrane naključno v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 26(4), ali oboje.
The number of such beneficiaries in the control sample shall not go beyond their proportion in the control population.
Število takšnih upravičencev v kontrolnem vzorcu ne presega njihovega deleža v kontrolni populaciji.
For the purposes of Article 32, Member States may, as a result of the risk analysis, select specific rural development measures which apply to the beneficiaries.’;
Države članice lahko za namene člena 32 kot rezultat analize tveganja izberejo posebne ukrepe za razvoj podeželja, ki se uporabljajo za upravičence.“;
For the purposes of Articles 30 to 33 and point (c) of Article 40a(1), the same beneficiary may be used to respect several of the minimum control rates concerned provided that the effectiveness of selection of the risk based samples required therein is not affected.
Za namene členov od 30 do 33 in člena 40a(1)(c) se lahko isti upravičenec uporabi za upoštevanje več zadevnih najmanjših stopenj kontrole, če to ne vpliva na učinkovitost izbora vzorcev na podlagi tveganja, ki je zahtevana v njih.
The on-the-spot check regarding the selected beneficiaries may be limited to the aid scheme or rural development measure they have been selected for if the minimum control rates of the other aid schemes or support measures they applied for are already respected.’;
Pregled na kraju samem v zvezi z izbranimi upravičenci je lahko omejen na shemo pomoči ali ukrep za razvoj podeželja, za katerega so bili izbrani, če so najmanjše stopnje kontrole pri drugih shemah pomoči ali podpornih ukrepih, za katere so zaprosili, že izpolnjene.“;
by comparing the results as regards the difference between the area declared and the area determined of the risk based and randomly selected sample; or by comparing the results as regards the difference between the animals declared and the animals determined of the risk based and randomly selected sample;’;
s primerjavo rezultatov, kar zadeva razliko med prijavljeno površino in ugotovljeno površino iz vzorca, izbranega na podlagi tveganja, in naključno izbranega vzorca; ali s primerjavo rezultatov, kar zadeva razliko med prijavljenimi živalmi in ugotovljenimi živalmi iz vzorca, izbranega na podlagi tveganja, in naključno izbranega vzorca;“;