natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The 2015 Annual Report of the German potash mining company K+S indicates that small and medium-sized disused tailing piles have been covered as part of their old pile strategy in an effort to avoid and minimise long-term impact on nature and the environment.
Čeprav se torej lahko tehnične podrobnosti teh projektov razlikujejo glede na posebne razmere na posameznem območju, projekta ni mogoče šteti za ekološko inovativnega v skladu z oddelkom 3.1.1 smernic o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja iz leta 2008.
Overall, 41 disused tailing piles in Lower Saxony and two in Baden-Württemberg are currently being maintained.
Največja intenzivnost pomoči za družbo Iberpotash kot veliko podjetje v skladu s točko 76 smernic o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja iz leta 2008 torej znaša 50 % upravičenih stroškov.
Fifteen of these have been revegetated and another six are in the process of being revegetated.
Zato najvišji znesek pomoči, ki ga Komisija šteje za združljivega z notranjim trgom v skladu s smernicami o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja iz leta 2008 kot pomoč za naložbe, ki družbi Iberpotash omogoča, da izboljša varstvo okolja, znaša 3902461,30 EUR.
Therefore, even though the technical details of these projects may vary depending on the particular conditions of each site, the project cannot be consider as eco-innovation according to Section 3.1.1 of the 2008 Environmental Aid Guidelines.
Posledično Komisija meni, da je preostanek skupnega zneska pomoči za ta ukrep (tj. 3985109,70 EUR) nezakonita in nezdružljiva pomoč.
The maximum aid intensity for Iberpotash as a large enterprise according to point 76 of the 2008 Environmental Aid Guidelines is thus 50 % of eligible costs.
VRAČILO
Therefore, the maximum aid amount that the Commission considers compatible with the internal market under the 2008 Environmental Aid Guidelines as investment aid enabling Iberpotash to increase the level of environmental protection is EUR 3902461,30.
Komisija je v skladu s Pogodbo in ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča pristojna za odločanje, ali mora zadevna država članica ukiniti ali spremeniti pomoč, za katero je ugotovila, da ni združljiva z notranjim trgom.
Consequently, the Commission considers the rest of the total aid amount for this measure (i.e. EUR 3985109,70) as illegal and incompatible aid.
Sodišče je dosledno menilo tudi, da je obveznost države članice, da ukine pomoč, za katero Komisija meni, da je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom, namenjena ponovni vzpostavitvi predhodnega stanja.
RECOVERY
V tem okviru je Sodišče odločilo, da je ta cilj dosežen, če prejemnik vrne zneske, ki so bili dodeljeni z nezakonito pomočjo, in se tako odpove ugodnostim, ki jih je užival v primerjavi s konkurenti na trgu, ter če se ponovno vzpostavi stanje pred plačilom pomoči.
According to the Treaty and the Court's established case-law, the Commission is competent to decide that the Member State concerned must abolish or alter aid when it has found that it is incompatible with the internal market.
V skladu s sodno prakso člen 16(1) Uredbe Sveta (EU) 2015/1589 določa, da „če se v primerih nezakonite pomoči sprejmejo negativni sklepi, Komisija odloči, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da upravičenec vrne pomoč […]“.
The Court has also consistently held that the obligation on a Member State to abolish aid regarded by the Commission as being incompatible with the internal market is designed to re-establish the previously existing situation.
Zato je treba pomoč, glede na to, da sta bila zadevna ukrepa:
In this context, the Court has established that this objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored.
skupni znesek pomoči, dodeljene družbi Iberpotash v okviru ukrepa 1 v obliki nižjih bančnih provizij za znižano raven garancij, za obdobje 2006–2016 v višini 1864622 EUR, in
In line with the case-law, Article 16(1) of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 stated that ‘where negative decisions are taken in cases of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary […]’.
del ukrepa 4, ki presega največjo intenzivnost pomoči za naložbe, ki je družbi Iberpotash omogočila, da izboljša varstvo okolja s prekritjem jalovišča Vilafruns, in znaša 3985109,70 EUR, izvedena v nasprotju s členom 108 Pogodbe ter ju je treba šteti za nezakonito in nezdružljivo pomoč, vrniti, da se ponovno vzpostavijo razmere, kakršne so bile na trgu pred dodelitvijo pomoči.
Thus, given that the measures in question:
Vračilo pomoči bi moralo zato zajeti obdobje od datuma, ko je bila upravičencu dodeljena prednost, tj. ko mu je bila pomoč dana na voljo, do datuma njenega dejanskega vračila, zneskom, ki jih je treba vrniti, pa se prištejejo obresti do datuma dejanskega vračila.
the total amount of aid granted to Iberpotash under Measure 1 in the form of lower bank fees for the reduced level of the guarantees for the period 2006-2016 and amounting to EUR 1864622; and
SKLEPNE UGOTOVITVE
the part of the Measure 4 going beyond the maximum aid intensity for investment aid enabling Iberpotash to increase the level of environmental protection by covering Vilafruns waste heap and amounting to EUR 3985109,70, were implemented in violation of Article 108 of the Treaty, and are to be considered as unlawful and incompatible aid, they must be recovered in order to re-establish the situation that existed on the market prior to their granting.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Španija nezakonito izvedla pomoč, dodeljeno družbi Iberpotash v okviru ukrepa 1 v obliki neupravičeno nizkih provizij za garancije, ki so bile posledica neupravičeno nizke ravni garancij za obdobje 2006–2016, v višini 1864622 EUR in s tem kršila člen 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Recovery should cover the time from when the advantage accrued to the beneficiary, that is to say when the aid was put at the disposal of the beneficiary, until effective recovery, and the sums to be recovered should bear interest until effective recovery.
Komisija ugotavlja, da ta pomoč ni združljiva z notranjim trgom in jo je treba vrniti.
CONCLUSION
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Španija nezakonito izvedla pomoč za naložbe, ki je družbi Iberpotash omogočila, da izboljša varstvo okolja s prekritjem jalovišča Vilafruns (ukrep 4), in s tem kršila člen 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The Commission finds that Spain has unlawfully implemented the aid granted to Iberpotash under Measure 1 in the form of unduly low guarantee fees resulting from the unduly low level of the guarantees for the period 2006-2016 amounting to EUR 1864622 in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Vendar Komisija ugotavlja, da je del ukrepa 4, ki znaša 3902461,30 EUR, združljiv z notranjim trgom v smislu člena 107(3)(c), ker je v skladu s smernicami o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja iz leta 2008.
The Commission finds that this aid is incompatible with the internal market and must be recovered.
Nasprotno pa Komisija ugotavlja, da preostali del skupnega zneska pomoči za ukrep 4, ki presega dovoljeno največjo intenzivnost pomoči, in sicer v višini 3985109,70 EUR, ni združljiv z notranjim trgom in ga je treba vrniti –
The Commission finds that Spain has unlawfully implemented the investment aid enabling Iberpotash to increase the level of environmental protection by covering Vilafruns waste heap (Measure 4) in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
However, the Commission finds that part of Measure 4 amounting to EUR 3902461,30 is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) as it is in line with the 2008 Environmental Aid Guidelines.
Člen 1
On the contrary, the Commission finds the remaining part of the total aid amount for Measure 4 going beyond the authorised maximum aid intensity, namely EUR 3985109,70, is incompatible with the internal market and must be recovered,
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Španija nezakonito dodelila družbi Iberpotash v obliki neupravičeno nizkih provizij za garancije, ki so bile posledica neupravičeno nizke ravni garancij za obdobje 2006–2016, v višini 1864622 EUR, in s tem kršila člen 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ni združljiva z notranjim trgom.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Državna pomoč za prekritje jalovišča Vilafruns v višini 3902461,30 EUR, ki jo je Španija nezakonito dodelila družbi Iberpotash in s tem kršila člen 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, je združljiva z notranjim trgom v smislu člena 107(3)(c).
Article 1
Preostali del državne pomoči za prekritje jalovišča Vilafruns v višini 3985109,70 EUR, ki jo je Španija nezakonito dodelila družbi Iberpotash in s tem kršila člen 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ni združljiv z notranjim trgom.
The State aid in favour of Iberpotash in the form of unduly low guarantee fees resulting from the unduly low level of the guarantees for the period 2006-2016 amounting to EUR 1864622, unlawfully granted by Spain, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is incompatible with the internal market.
Člen 2
The State aid for covering Vilafruns waste heap amounting to EUR 3902461,30 unlawfully granted by Spain, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in favour of Iberpotash is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c).
Španija od upravičenca izterja pomoč iz člena 1(1) in (3).
The remaining part of State aid for covering Vilafruns waste heap amounting to EUR 3985109,70 unlawfully granted by Spain, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in favour of Iberpotash is incompatible with the internal market.
Zneski, ki jih je treba izterjati, morajo vključevati obresti od datuma, ko so bili dani na voljo upravičencu, do datuma dejanske izterjave.
Article 2
Obresti se izračunajo z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 271/2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004.
Spain shall recover the aid referred to in Article 1(1) and (3) from the beneficiary.
Španija prekliče vsa neizvedena plačila pomoči iz člena 1(1) in (3), z začetkom veljavnosti na datum sprejetja tega sklepa.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiary until their actual recovery.
Člen 3
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 and with Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Vračilo pomoči iz člena 1(1) in (3) je takojšnje in učinkovito.
Spain shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1(1) and (3) with effect from the date of adoption of this decision.
Španija zagotovi, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tem sklepu.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1(1) and (3) shall be immediate and effective.
Španija v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tem sklepu Komisiji predloži naslednje informacije:
Spain shall ensure that this decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
skupni znesek (glavnico in obresti), ki ga je treba izterjati od upravičenca;
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Spain shall submit the following information to the Commission:
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da se je od upravičenca zahtevalo vračilo pomoči.
the total amount (principal and interests) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
Španija obvešča Komisijo o napredku v zvezi z nacionalnimi ukrepi, sprejetimi za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler ni pomoč iz člena 1(1) in (3) v celoti vrnjena.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Na zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
Zagotovi tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za vračilo, ki jih je upravičenec že vrnil.
Spain shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1(1) and (3) has been completed.
Člen 5
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Kraljevino Španijo.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
V Bruslju, 31. avgusta 2017
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.
Članica Komisije
Done at Brussels, 31 August 2017.
UL C 142, 22.4.2016, str.
For the Commission
18.
Member of the Commission
Glej sprotno opombo 1.
OJ C 142, 22.4.2016, p.
Direktiva 2006/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o ravnanju z odpadki iz rudarskih in drugih ekstraktivnih dejavnosti ter o spremembi Direktive 2004/35/ES (UL L 102, 11.4.2006, str.
18.
15).
See footnote 1.
Direktiva 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike (UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str.
Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC (OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p.
1).
15).
Domnevne kršitve direktive o rudarskih odpadkih, obravnavane v tem postopku za ugotavljanje kršitev, se ne nanašajo na znesek finančnih garancij na podlagi člena 14 Direktive, kot je ocenjen v tem sklepu.
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.
Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja (UL C 82, 1.4.2008, str.
The alleged breaches of the Extractive Waste Directive put forward in this infringement procedure do not relate to the amount of the financial guarantees under Article 14 of the directive as assessed in the present decision.
Direktiva Sveta 75/442/EGS z dne 15. julija 1975 o odpadkih (UL L 194, 25.7.1975, str.
Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection (OJ C 82, 1.4.2008, p.
39).
1).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1998/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe pri pomoči de minimis (UL L 379, 28.12.2006, str.
Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste (OJ L 194, 25.7.1975, p.
5).
39).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1407/2013 z dne 18. decembra 2013 o uporabi členov 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pri pomoči de minimis (UL L 352, 24.12.2013, str.
5).
Glej člen 2(4)(h) odloka št. 202/1994.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 of 18 December 2013 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid (OJ L 352, 24.12.2013, p.
Glede na študijo ERF, ki jo je predložil pritožnik (glej uvodno izjavo 68), je leta 2011 delujoče jalovišče na območju rudnika Balsareny/Sallent (El Cogulló) imelo 35 hektarjev površine in 41 Mt odloženih odpadkov, delujoče jalovišče na območju rudnika Suria (El Fusteret) pa je imelo 27 hektarjev površine in 22 Mt odloženih odpadkov.
1).
A study of the costs of improving management of mine waste (Študija stroškov izboljšanja ravnanja z rudarskimi odpadki), Symonds Group v sodelovanju s COWI, poročilo za GD za okolje, Evropska komisija, končno poročilo iz oktobra 2001.
See Article 2.4(h) of Decree 202/1994.
Zdi se, da ustreznost uporabe člena 2(4)(h) odloka št. 202/1994 v zvezi s tem potrjujejo tudi pripombe družbe Iberpotash k sklepu o začetku postopka (glej zlasti odstavek 68 pripomb).
According to the ERF Study submitted by the complainant (see recital 68), in 2011 the active waste heap in Balsareny/Sallent (El Cogulló) had an area of 35 hectares and the mass of waste of 41 Mt while the active waste heap in Suria (El Fusteret) had an area of 27 hectares and the mass of waste of 22 Mt.
Glej na primer letno poročilo nemške družbe za pridobivanje kalijevega oksida K+S Kali GmbHfor iz leta 2015, str.
A study of the costs of improving management of mine waste, Symonds Group in association with COWI, report to DG Environment, European Commission, final report October 2001.
48 (http://www.k-plus-s.com/en/archiv/finanzberichte.html), sanacijske metode, ki so se uporabile za alzaška jalovišča, kot so opisane v dokumentu ACA, ki je predložen kot Priloga 2 k stališču španskih organov z dne 19. aprila 2016, ali knjigo nemškega strokovnjaka Henryja Raucheja: Die Kaliindustrie im 21.
The appropriateness of using Article 2.4(h) of the Decree 202/1994 in this respect seems to be also acknowledged by the observations of Iberpotash on the Opening Decision (see in particular paragraph 68 of the observations).
Jahrhundert, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015, https://mining-report.de/blog/henry-rauche-die-kaliindustrie-im-21-jahrhundert/.
See e.g. Annual Report of the German potash mining company K+S Kali GmbH for 2015, page 48 (http://www.k-plus-s.com/en/archiv/finanzberichte.html), the restoration methods used for Alsatian waste heaps as described in the ACA document provided as Annex 2 to the submission of the Spanish authorities of 19 April 2016 or a book by a German expert Henry Rauche: Die Kaliindustrie im 21.
Odločba Komisije 1999/227/ESPJ z dne 29. julija 1998 o pomoči, ki jo je dežela Spodnja Saška (Nemčija) odobrila družbi Georgsmarienhütte GmbH (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str.
Jahrhundert, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015, https://mining-report.de/blog/henry-rauche-die-kaliindustrie-im-21-jahrhundert/
72).
Commission Decision 1999/227/ECSC of 29 July 1998 on aid granted by the Land of Lower Saxony (Germany) to Georgsmarienhütte GmbH (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p.
Glej tudi zadevo C-200/97, Ecotrade, ECLI:EU:C1998:579, zlasti točko 41.
72).
Ley 39/2015, de 1 de octubre, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2015-10565&p=20151002&tn=1#a99.
See also case C-200/97 Ecotrade, ECLI:EU:C1998:579, in particular paragraph 41.
Direktiva 2004/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o okoljski odgovornosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem in sanacijo okoljske škode (UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str.
Ley 39/2015, de 1 de octubre, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2015-10565&p=20151002&tn=1#a99
56).
Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p.
Glej zlasti odstavek 11 stališč španskih organov glede pripomb tretje osebe, predloženih 27. julija 2016.
56).
Glej Odločbo Komisije 94/449/ES z dne 14. decembra 1993 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89 (zadeva št.
See in particular paragraph 11 of the Spanish authorities comments on third party observations submitted on 27 July 2016.
IV/M.308 - Kali- Salz/MdK/Treuhand) (UL L 186, 21.7.1994, str.
See Commission Decision 94/449/EC of 14 December 1993 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Case No IV/M.308 — Kali- Salz/MdK/Treuhand) (OJ L 186, 21.7.1994, p.
38).
38).
Memoria de Sostenibilidad 2014, str.
Memoria de Sostenibilidad 2014, page 15, http://www.icliberia.com/noticia/icl-iberia-presents-the-sustainability-report
15, http://www.icliberia.com/noticia/icl-iberia-presents-the-sustainability-report.
See Iberpotash's comments on the Opening Decision, paragraph 23.
Glej pripombe družbe Iberpotash k sklepu o začetku postopka, odstavek 23.
Since the guarantee for Balsareny/Sallent was set by the authorisation issued on 29 April 2008, the difference in the guarantee fees for Balsareny/Sallent in this year is calculated as 8/12 of the annual amount.
Ker je bila garancija za rudnik Balsareny/Sallent določena z dovoljenjem, izdanim 29. aprila 2008, je razlika v provizijah za garancijo za rudnik Balsareny/Sallent v tem letu izračunana kot 8/12 letnega zneska.
Since the guarantee for Suria was set by the authorisation issued on 9 November 2006, the difference in the guarantee fees for Suria in this year is calculated as 1/12 of the annual amount.
Ker je bila garancija za rudnik Suria določena z dovoljenjem, izdanim 9. novembra 2006, je razlika v provizijah za garancijo za rudnik Suria v tem letu izračunana kot 1/12 letnega zneska.
Since the guarantee for Suria was increased to the ‘correct’ amount as of May 2015, the difference in the guarantee fees for Suria in this year is calculated as 4/12 of the annual amount.
Ker je bila garancija za rudnik Suria zvišana na „pravilni“ znesek maja 2015, je razlika v provizijah za garancijo za rudnik Suria v tem letu izračunana kot 4/12 letnega zneska.
See observations of the Spanish authorities to the Opening Decision, paragraph 55.
Glej pripombe španskih organov k sklepu o začetku postopka, odstavek 55.
Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 (OJ C 200, 28.6.2014, p.
Sporočilo Komisije – Smernice o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja in energijo za obdobje 2014–2020 (UL C 200, 28.6.2014, str.
Commission Decision (EU) 2018/119
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2018/119
on State aid SA.47702 (2017/C) (ex 2017/N) — United Kingdom
o državni pomoči SA.47702 (2017/C) (ex 2017/N) – Združeno kraljestvo
Alternative package to replace the commitment for the Royal Bank of Scotland to divest the Rainbow business
Nadomestni sveženj, ki bo nadomestil zavezo banke Royal Bank of Scotland za odprodajo poslovnih enot v okviru projekta Rainbow
(notified under document C(2017) 6184)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2017) 6184)
By decisions of 14 December 2009 (‘Restructuring Decision’), the Commission declared a number of State aid measures granted to Royal Bank of Scotland (‘RBS’) compatible with the internal market.
Komisija je s sklepom z dne 14. decembra 2009 („sklep o prestrukturiranju“) več ukrepov državne pomoči, odobrenih banki Royal Bank of Scotland („RBS“), razglasila za združljive z notranjim trgom.
The conclusion was reached on the basis of the restructuring plan (‘Restructuring Plan’) and of the commitments (‘Commitments’) issued by the Government of the United Kingdom (the ‘UK authorities’).
Sklepna ugotovitev je bila sprejeta na podlagi načrta prestrukturiranja („načrt prestrukturiranja“) in zavez („zaveze“), ki jih je izdala vlada Združenega kraljestva („organi Združenega kraljestva“).
By decision of 9 April 2014 (‘Amended Restructuring Decision’), the Commission declared that the notified amended list of commitments (‘Amended Commitments’) does not constitute State aid.
Komisija je v sklepu z dne 9. aprila 2014 („spremenjeni sklep o prestrukturiranju“) ugotovila, da priglašeni spremenjeni seznam zavez („spremenjene zaveze“) ne pomeni državne pomoči.
The Amended Commitments also do not affect the conclusion reached in the Restructuring Decision that the State aid provided to RBS is compatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 107(3)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Spremenjene zaveze prav tako ne vplivajo na sklepno ugotovitev sklepa o prestrukturiranju, da je državna pomoč, zagotovljena banki RBS, združljiva z notranjim trgom na podlagi člena 107(3)(b) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).