natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Those high prices mainly affect consumers, in particular those placing such communications infrequently or having a low volume of consumption, which represent the vast majority of the consumers using intra-EU communications.
Za takšne ponudbe pogosto ne zaračunavajo glede na dejansko porabo, temveč lahko za določeno število minut klicev ali SMS sporočil znotraj EU zaračunavajo fiksno mesečno naročnino (ponudbe z dopolnilnimi storitvami) ali pa v mesečno kvoto minut klicev ali SMS sporočil vključijo določeno število minut klicev ali SMS sporočil znotraj EU, za kar ne zaračunajo doplačila ali zaračunajo le nizko doplačilo.
At the same time, several providers propose special offers particularly attractive for business customers and consumers with a significant consumption of intra-EU communications.
Vendar pogoji iz teh ponudb pogosto niso ugodni za potrošnike, ki komunikacijske storitve znotraj EU uporabljajo le občasno, nepredvidljivo ali v sorazmerno majhnem obsegu.
Such offers are often not charged based on actual consumption and may consist in a certain number of intra-EU call minutes or SMS messages for a fixed monthly fee (add-on offers) or in the inclusion of a certain number of intra-EU call minutes or SMS messages in the monthly allowance of call minutes or SMS messages, either without any surcharge or with a small surcharge.
Posledično lahko ti potrošniki za svoje komunikacije znotraj EU plačujejo previsoko ceno in bi jih bilo treba zaščititi.
However, the terms of those offers are often not attractive for consumers with only occasional, unpredictable or relatively low volumes of intra-EU communications.
Visoke cene za komunikacije znotraj EU poleg tega predstavljajo oviro za delovanje notranjega trga, saj potrošnike odvračajo od iskanja in kupovanja blaga in storitev pri ponudnikih, ki se nahajajo v drugih državah članicah.
Consequently, those consumers risk paying excessive prices for their intra-EU communications and should be protected.
Zato je treba določiti specifične in sorazmerne omejitve cen, ki jih ponudniki javno dostopnih medosebnih komunikacijskih storitev na podlagi številke lahko zaračunajo potrošnikom za komunikacije znotraj EU, ter tako odpraviti takšne visoke cene.
Moreover, high prices for intra-EU communications represent a barrier to the functioning of the internal market as they discourage seeking and purchasing goods and services from a provider located in another Member State.
Kadar ponudniki javno dostopnih medosebnih komunikacijskih storitev na podlagi številke svojim potrošnikom komunikacije znotraj EU zaračunavajo izključno ali delno na podlagi porabe teh storitev, tudi kadar se ta poraba odšteva od mesečnih ali predplačanih kvot takšnih storitev, cene zanje ne bi smele preseči zneska 0,19 EUR za minuto na klic in 0,06 EUR za SMS sporočilo.
It is hence necessary to set specific and proportionate limits to the price that providers of publicly available number-based interpersonal communications services may charge consumers for intra-EU communications in order to eliminate such high prices.
Te zgornje cene ustrezajo najvišjim cenam, ki se trenutno zaračunavajo za regulirane gostujoče klice oziroma SMS sporočila.
When providers of publicly available number-based interpersonal communications services charge their consumers for intra-EU communications at rates wholly or partly based on the consumption of such services, including in cases of consumption-based deduction from a monthly or prepaid allowance for such services, those rates should not exceed EUR 0,19 per minute for calls and EUR 0,06 per SMS message.
Med uporabo storitev gostovanja v Uniji so potrošniki zaščiteni z euro tarifo za klice in za SMS sporočila, ki jo je postopoma zamenjalo gostovanje „enako kot doma“.
Those caps correspond to the maximum prices which currently apply, respectively, to regulated roaming calls and SMS messages.
Gostujoči klici znotraj Unije in klici znotraj EU imajo podobno stroškovno strukturo.
Those caps are also considered to be a suitable benchmark for setting the maximum rate for regulated intra-EU communications for five years starting from 15 May 2019.
Zgornje cene se bodo neposredno uporabljale samo za cene, zaračunane za dejansko porabo.
The current level of the cap represents a simple, transparent and proven safety-net for protection against high prices and is suitable as a cap for retail prices of all regulated intra-EU communications.
Disciplinski učinek bi morale imeti tudi na ponudbe, v katere je določena kvota komunikacij znotraj EU vključena brez doplačila, saj potrošniki lahko izberejo tarifo, zaračunano glede na porabo komunikacij storitev znotraj EU.
Both roaming calls within the Union and intra-EU calls share a similar cost structure.
Zgornje cene bi se morale uporabljati za porabo komunikacij znotraj EU, ki presegajo kvote iz paketa in se zaračunavajo posebej.
The caps should allow the providers of publicly available number-based interpersonal communications services to recoup their costs, thus ensuring a proportionate intervention on both the mobile and fixed calls market.
Ta ukrep bi moral na sorazmeren način zagotoviti, da so potrošniki z majhno porabo komunikacij znotraj EU zaščiteni pred visokimi cenami, istočasno pa naj bi imel zgolj zmeren učinek za ponudnike.
The caps will apply directly only to rates based on actual consumption.
Ponudniki javno dostopnih medosebnih komunikacijskih storitev na podlagi številke bi morali imeti možnost, da potrošnikom ponudijo drugačne tarife za mednarodne komunikacije z drugačnimi cenami za regulirane komunikacije znotraj EU, potrošniki pa bi morali imeti možnost, da izrecno izberejo takšne ponudbe ter da se kadar koli brezplačno vrnejo k prvotni izbiri, tudi k ponudbam, na katere so se naročili pred začetkom veljavnosti takšnih določb.
They should have a disciplining effect also on those offers where a certain volume of intra-EU communications is included without being charged separately as consumers have the choice to switch to a consumption-based tariff for their intra-EU communications.
Ponudnikom ne bi bilo treba izpolniti obveznosti, da ne presežejo najvišjih določenih zgornjih cen za regulirane komunikacije znotraj EU, samo pri alternativnih ponudbah za mednarodne komunikacije, kot na primer tiste, v katere so zajete vse ali nekatere tretje države, če se s tem strinja potrošnik.
Intra-EU communication volumes which go beyond those included in a bundle and are charged separately should be subject to the caps.
Druge posebne ponudbe, kot so cenejša terminalska oprema ali popusti za druge elektronske komunikacijske storitve, ki jih ponudniki ponujajo potrošnikom, so del običajnih prizadevanj za konkurenčnost in ne bi smele vplivati na uporabo zgornjih cen za regulirane komunikacije znotraj EU.
The measure should ensure, in a proportionate manner, that consumers with a low level of consumption of intra-EU communications are protected against high prices and should, at the same time, have only a moderate impact on providers.
Določitev zgornjih cen za regulirane komunikacije znotraj EU bi lahko imela precej večji učinek za nekatere ponudnike javno dostopnih medosebnih komunikacijskih storitev na podlagi številke kot za večino drugih.
Providers of publicly available number-based interpersonal communications services should be able to propose to their consumers alternative tariff offers for international communications with different rates for regulated intra-EU communications and consumers should be free to opt for such offers expressly, and to switch back any time and free of charge, even for offers to which consumers subscribed before the entry into force of such provisions.
To bi lahko zlasti veljalo za tiste ponudnike, ki ustvarijo znaten delež svojih prihodkov ali dobička iz poslovanja s komunikacijami znotraj EU ali katerih domače marže so nizke glede na merila za sektor.
Only alternative offers for international communications, such as those covering all or some third countries, should, where accepted by a consumer, be able to free a provider from its obligation not to exceed the caps for regulated intra-EU communications.
Zaradi pritiska na marže za regulirane komunikacije znotraj EU ponudnikov domači cenovni model morda ne bo vzdržen.
Other advantages, such as subsidised terminal equipment or discounts on other electronic communications services, offered by providers to consumers are a normal part of competitive interaction and should not affect the applicability of the price caps for regulated intra-EU communications.
Takšni scenariji se verjetno ne bodo zgodili, saj so najvišje cene očitno nad stroški, ki nastanejo z zagotavljanjem komunikacij znotraj EU.
Some providers of publicly available number-based interpersonal communications services may be significantly more affected than the majority of other providers in the Union by a price cap for regulated intra-EU communications.
Kljub temu pa bi bilo treba nacionalnim regulativnim organom omogočiti, da se odzovejo na takšne izjemne scenarije na sorazmeren način, in jim dati možnost, da v utemeljenih in izjemnih primerih temu ponudniku na njegovo zahtevo odobrijo odstopanje.
This could, in particular, be the case for those providers which generate a particularly high share of their revenues or operational profits with intra-EU communications or whose domestic margins are low compared to industry benchmarks.
Odstopanje bi bilo treba odobriti le, kadar ponudnik lahko na podlagi ustreznih meril, ki jih določi BEREC, dokaže, da je učinek zanj znatno večji kot za večino drugih ponudnikov v Uniji in da bi ta učinek znatno oslabil sposobnost zadevnega ponudnika, da ohrani svoj model cen za notranje komunikacije.
As a consequence of margin compression as regards regulated intra-EU communications, a provider might not be able to sustain its domestic pricing model.
Kadar nacionalni regulativni organ odobri odstopanje, bi moral določiti tudi najvišjo stopnjo cen, ki bi jo ponudnik lahko uporabil za regulirane komunikacije znotraj EU in ki bi mu omogočila, da ohrani raven konkurenčnih cen za notranje komunikacije.
Such scenarios are highly unlikely to occur because the maximum prices are clearly above the costs for providing intra-EU communications.
Takšno odstopanje bi moralo biti omejeno na eno leto in bi se lahko podaljšalo, če bi ponudnik dokazal nadaljnje izpolnjevanje pogojev za odstopanje.
Nevertheless, in order to address such very exceptional scenarios in a proportionate manner, NRAs should be able to grant a derogation upon the request of such provider in justified and exceptional cases.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti bi bilo treba časovno omejiti uporabo zgornjih cen za regulirane komunikacije znotraj EU in jo prenehati uporabljati pet let po začetku veljavnosti.
Any derogation should be granted only where a provider can demonstrate, against a relevant benchmark established by BEREC, that it is significantly more affected than most other providers in the Union and that that impact would significantly weaken that provider’s capacity to maintain its charging model for domestic communications.
Takšna časovno omejena uporaba bi morala omogočiti, da se ustrezno ocenijo učinki ukrepov ter presodi, v kolikšni meri je še treba zaščititi potrošnike.
Where an NRA grants a derogation, it should determine the maximum price level that a provider could apply for regulated intra-EU communications and which would enable it to maintain a competitive price level for domestic communications.
Da bi zagotovili, da so potrošniki, za katere imajo znatne razlike v cenah komunikacij znotraj EU negativne posledice, dosledno, pravočasno in najučinkoviteje zaščiteni po vsej Uniji, bi se morale takšne določbe uporabljati neposredno in bi torej morale biti vključene v uredbo.
Any such derogation should be limited to one year and be renewable if the provider demonstrates that the conditions for a derogation continue to be fulfilled.
Najustreznejša uredba za ta namen je Uredba (EU) 2015/2120, ki je bila sprejeta na podlagi ocene učinka, ki je med drugim predlagala določbo o komunikacijah znotraj EU kot nujno za dokončanje notranjega trga elektronskih komunikacij.
In light of the principle of proportionality, the applicability of the price caps for regulated intra-EU communications should be limited in time and should expire five years after its entry into force.
Učinki, ki jih bo verjetno imela določba o komunikacijah znotraj EU na ponudnike, so nadalje zmanjšani z uporabo euro tarife za klice in SMS sporočila za gostovanje kot zgornje cene za fiksne in mobilne komunikacije, ki v tem ukrepu predstavlja varnostni mehanizem; poleg tega pa tudi dokazi iz analize, ki jo je leta 2018 opravil BEREC, kažejo na precejšen upad obsega fiksnega prometa, na katerega bo v vmesnem obdobju učinkoval ukrep.
Such a limited duration should allow proper assessment of the effects of the measures and evaluation to what extent there is an ongoing need to protect consumers.
Zato bi bilo treba te določbe uvesti s spremembo Uredbe (EU) 2015/2120, ki bi jo bilo treba tudi prilagoditi, tako da bi bilo zagotovljeno, da države članice sprejmejo pravila o kaznih za kršitev teh določb.
In order to ensure Union-wide, consistent, timely and most effective protection of consumers negatively affected by the significant price differences of intra-EU communications, such provisions should be directly applicable and enshrined in a regulation.
Ker ciljev te uredbe, in sicer zagotovitev doslednega izvajanja regulativnega okvira za elektronske komunikacije, zlasti v zvezi s čezmejnimi vidiki in z učinkovitimi postopki notranjega trga pri osnutkih nacionalnih ukrepov, ter za zagotovitev, da potrošnikom niso zaračunane pretirane cene, kadar uporabljajo medosebne komunikacijske storitve na podlagi številke iz države članice potrošnikovega domačega ponudnika na fiksno ali mobilno številko v drugi državi članici, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepa lažje dosežejo na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
The most suitable regulation for that purpose is Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, which was adopted after an impact assessment which proposed, inter alia, a provision on intra-EU communications as a necessary means by which to complete the internal market for electronic communications.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
The likely impacts on providers’ revenues generated by the provision of intra-EU communications are further mitigated by the application of the roaming euro-voice tariff and euro-SMS tariff as caps to both fixed and mobile communications, which serve as a safety mechanism; and by evidence, provided by BEREC’s 2018 analysis, of a considerable decline in relevant volumes of fixed traffic affected by the measure in the intervening period.
Ta uredba spreminja in razširja področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 1211/2009.
Those provisions should therefore be introduced as an amendment to Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, which should also be adapted to ensure that Member States adopt rules on penalties for the infringement of such provisions.
Ker so potrebne znatne spremembe, bi bilo treba zaradi jasnosti navedeni akt razveljaviti.
Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely to ensure the consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications, in particular in relation to cross-border aspects and through efficient internal market procedures for draft national measures, and to ensure that consumers are not charged excessive prices for making number-based interpersonal communications originating in the Member State of the consumer’s domestic provider and terminating at any fixed or mobile number in another Member State, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at the level of the Union, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Sklicevanja na razveljavljeno uredbo bi se morala šteti za sklicevanja na to uredbo –
This Regulation amends and extends the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009.
POGLAVJE I
Since the amendments to be made are of a substantial nature, that act should, in the interests of clarity, be repealed.
PREDMET UREJANJA IN PODROČJE UPORABE
References to the repealed regulation should be construed as references to this Regulation,
Člen 1
CHAPTER I
Ta uredba ustanavlja Organ evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije (BEREC) in Agencijo za podporo BEREC-u (Urad BEREC).
SUBJECT MATTER AND SCOPE
BEREC in Urad BEREC nadomestita Organ evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije oziroma Urad, ki sta bila ustanovljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1211/2009.
Subject matter and scope
Pravna osebnost Urada BEREC
This Regulation establishes the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (‘BEREC’) and the Agency for Support for BEREC (the ‘BEREC Office’).
Urad BEREC je organ Unije.
BEREC and the BEREC Office shall, respectively, replace and succeed the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications and the Office, which were established by Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009.
Ima pravno osebnost.
Article 2
Urad BEREC ima v vsaki državi članici kar najširšo pravno in poslovno sposobnost, ki jo pravnim osebam priznava nacionalno pravo.
Legal personality of the BEREC Office
Zlasti lahko pridobi premično in nepremično premoženje in z njim razpolaga ter je lahko stranka v sodnem postopku.
The BEREC Office shall be a body of the Union.
Urad BEREC zastopa njegov direktor.
It shall have legal personality.
Urad BEREC ima izključno odgovornost za naloge, ki so mu dodeljene, in pristojnosti, ki so nanj prenesene.
In each Member State the BEREC Office shall enjoy the most extensive legal capacity accorded to legal persons under national law.
Urad BEREC ima sedež v Rigi.
It shall, in particular, be capable of acquiring and disposing of movable and immovable property and being party to legal proceedings.
POGLAVJE II
The BEREC Office shall be represented by its Director.
CILJI IN NALOGE BEREC-a
The BEREC Office shall have sole responsibility for the tasks assigned to and the powers conferred on it.
Člen 3
The BEREC Office shall have its seat in Riga.
Cilji BEREC-a
CHAPTER II
BEREC deluje na področju uporabe uredb (EU) št. 531/2012 in (EU) 2015/2120 ter Direktive (EU) 2018/1972.
OBJECTIVES AND TASKS OF BEREC
BEREC izvaja svoje naloge neodvisno, nepristransko, pregledno in pravočasno.
Article 3
BEREC se opira na strokovno znanje nacionalnih regulativnih organov.
BEREC shall act within the scope of Regulations (EU) No 531/2012 and (EU) 2015/2120 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972.
V državah članicah, v katerih je na podlagi Direktive (EU) 2018/1972 pristojen več kot en nacionalni regulativni organ, se ti organi po potrebi medsebojno usklajujejo.
BEREC shall pursue the objectives set out in Article 3 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972.
Člen 4
In particular, BEREC shall aim to ensure the consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications within the scope referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
Regulativne naloge BEREC-a
BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially, transparently and in a timely manner.
BEREC ima naslednje regulativne naloge:
BEREC shall draw upon the expertise available in the national regulatory authorities (NRAs).
pomaga in svetuje nacionalnim regulativnim organom, Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji ter sodeluje z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in Komisijo, na zahtevo ali na lastno pobudo, pri vseh tehničnih zadevah v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijami, ki so v njegovi pristojnosti;
In accordance with Article 9(3) of Directive (EU) 2018/1972, each Member State shall ensure that its NRAs are able to participate fully in the work of organisational bodies of BEREC.
na zahtevo pomaga in svetuje Komisiji pri pripravi zakonodajnih predlogov na področju elektronskih komunikacij, vključno z vsemi predlaganimi spremembami te uredbe ali Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
In Member States where there is more than one NRA responsible under Directive (EU) 2018/1972, those NRAs shall coordinate with each other as necessary.
izdaja mnenja, kakor je navedeno v Uredbi (EU) št. 531/2012 in Direktivi (EU) 2018/1972, zlasti o:
Article 4
reševanju čezmejnih sporov v skladu s členom 27 Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
Regulatory tasks of BEREC
osnutkih nacionalnih ukrepov v zvezi s postopki notranjega trga za regulacijo trga v skladu s členi 32, 33 in 68 Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
BEREC shall have the following regulatory tasks:
osnutkih sklepov in priporočil o harmonizaciji v skladu s členoma 38 in 93 Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
to assist and advise the NRAs, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and cooperate with the NRAs and the Commission, upon request or on its own initiative, on any technical matter regarding electronic communications within its competence;
povezljivosti med koncema med končnimi uporabniki v skladu s členom 61(2) Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
to assist and advise the Commission, upon request, in relation to the preparation of legislative proposals in the field of electronic communications, including on any proposed amendment of this Regulation or of Directive (EU) 2018/1972;
določitvi enotne najvišje cene zaključevanja govornih klicev v mobilnih omrežjih na ravni Unije in enotne najvišje cene zaključevanja govornih klicev v fiksnih omrežjih na ravni Unije v skladu s členom 75 Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
to issue opinions as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, in particular on:
predlogi povzetka pogodbe v skladu s členom 102 Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
the resolution of cross-border disputes, in accordance with Article 27 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972;
nacionalnem izvajanju in delovanju splošne odobritve in njunem vplivu na delovanje notranjega trga v skladu s členom 122(3) Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
draft national measures related to the internal market procedures for market regulation, in accordance with Articles 32, 33 and 68 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972;
po potrebi o tržnem in tehnološkem razvoju v zvezi z različnimi vrstami elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev in njegovem učinku na uporabo naslova III dela III Direktive (EU) 2018/1972 v skladu s členom 123(1) navedene direktive;
draft decisions and recommendations on harmonisation, in accordance with Articles 38 and 93 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972;
izdaja smernice za izvajanje regulativnega okvira Unije za elektronske komunikacije, zlasti kot je naveden v uredbah (EU) št. 531/2012 in (EU) 2015/2120 ter v Direktivi (EU) 2018/1972, o:
end-to-end connectivity between end-users, in accordance with Article 61(2) of Directive (EU) 2018/1972;
predlogi uradnega obvestila v skladu s členom 12 Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
the determination of a single maximum Union-wide mobile voice termination rate and a single maximum Union-wide fixed voice termination rate, in accordance with Article 75 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972;
doslednem izvajanju obveznosti glede geografskih pregledov in napovedi v skladu s členom 22 Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
the contract summary template, in accordance with Article 102 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972;
ustreznih merilih za spodbujanje dosledne uporabe člena 61(3) Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
the national implementation and functioning of the general authorisation, and their impact on the functioning of the internal market, in accordance with Article 122(3) of Directive (EU) 2018/1972;
skupnih pristopih k določitvi omrežne priključne točke v različnih omrežnih topologijah v skladu s členom 61(7) Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;
where relevant, the market and technological developments regarding the different types of electronic communications services and their impact on the application of Title III of Part III of Directive (EU) 2018/1972, in accordance with Article 123(1) of that Directive;
skupnih pristopih za zadovoljevanje čeznacionalnega povpraševanja končnih uporabnikov v skladu s členom 66 Direktive (EU) 2018/1972;