natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to assist the Court in relation to certain technical issues, the President of the formation may authorise the parties' representatives to give the floor to individuals who, despite not having the status of representative, are best placed to comment.
Zastopnike se obvesti o času trajanja ustnih navedb, ki ga bodo imeli na voljo na podlagi teh predlogov.
Those individuals shall intervene only in the presence of the representative of the party concerned and responsibility for them shall lie with him.
Kadar eno stranko zastopa več zastopnikov, lahko ustne navedbe načeloma predstavita le dva izmed njih, celotna dolžina podajanja ustnih navedb pa ne sme prekoračiti časa, navedenega v točki 162 zgoraj.
Before addressing the Court, those individuals must identify themselves.
Vendar lahko odgovore na vprašanja sodnikov in končne replike dajejo tudi zastopniki, ki niso predstavili ustnih navedb.
The time taken in presenting oral submissions may vary, depending on the complexity of the case and on whether or not new facts have arisen.
Kadar več strank zagovarja enako stališče pred Splošnim sodiščem (zlasti pri intervencijah ali združenih zadevah), se njihove zastopnike poziva, naj se pred obravnavo uskladijo, da bi se izognili kakršnemu koli ponavljanju navedb.
Each of the main parties will be allowed 15 minutes and each intervener will be allowed 10 minutes to present oral submissions (in joined cases, each of the main parties will be allowed 15 minutes for each case and each intervener will be allowed 10 minutes for each case), unless the Registry has indicated otherwise.
Zastopnike se naproša, naj pri sklicevanju na odločbo Sodišča, Splošnega sodišča ali Sodišča za uslužbence navedejo poimenovanje, uporabljeno za to odločbo, opravilno številko zadeve in po potrebi upoštevno točko ali točke.
These limitations shall apply only to the oral submissions themselves and not to the time required to answer questions put at the hearing or for final replies.
V skladu s členom 85(3) Poslovnika lahko glavne stranke izjemoma predložijo dokaze še med obravnavo.
If circumstances so require, a request for leave to exceed the speaking time normally allowed, giving reasons and indicating the speaking time considered necessary, may be made to the Registry at least two weeks (or less, in duly substantiated exceptional circumstances) before the date fixed for the hearing.
V tem primeru se druge stranke izrečejo o njihovi dopustnosti in vsebini.
When such requests are made, representatives will be informed of the time which they will have for presenting their oral submissions.
Svetuje se, da se po potrebi zagotovi zadosti izvodov.
When several representatives act for a party, only two of them may normally present oral argument, and their combined speaking time must not exceed the time limits indicated in point 162 above.
D. Tolmačenje
However, representatives other than those who addressed the Court may answer questions from Members of the Court and make final replies.
Da bi se olajšalo tolmačenje, se zastopnikom strank predlaga, naj morebitno besedilo ali pisno podlago za svoje ustne navedbe predhodno posredujejo službi za tolmačenje po elektronski pošti (interpret@curia.europa.eu).
Where two or more parties are advancing the same argument before the Court (a situation which may arise where, in particular, there are interventions or where cases are joined), their representatives are requested to confer with each other before the hearing in order to avoid any repetition.
Zaupnost posredovanih besedil ustnih navedb je zagotovljena.
When citing a decision of the Court of Justice, the General Court or the Civil Service Tribunal, representatives are requested to refer to it by the usual name of the case and the case number, and, where relevant, to specify the relevant paragraph(s).
Da bi se izognili morebitnim nesporazumom, je treba navesti ime stranke.
In accordance with Article 85(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the main parties may, exceptionally, produce further evidence at the hearing.
Besedila ustnih navedb se ne vložijo v spis v zadevi.
In such cases, the other parties will be heard on the admissibility and content thereof.
Zastopnike se opozarja, da, odvisno od primera, le nekateri člani Splošnega sodišča spremljajo ustne navedbe v jeziku, v katerem se podajajo, in da preostali poslušajo simultano tolmačenje.
It would be prudent to bring sufficient copies where appropriate.
Zastopnikom se za boljši potek obravnave in ohranjanje ravni kakovosti simultanega tolmačenja priporoča, naj govorijo počasi in v mikrofon.
D. Interpretation
Če nameravajo zastopniki dobesedno navajati odlomke nekaterih besedil ali dokumentov, zlasti odstavkov, ki niso navedeni v spisu v zadevi, je priporočljivo, da se to tolmačem sporoči pred obravnavo.
In order to facilitate interpretation, parties' representatives are requested to send any text or written notes for their submissions to the Interpretation Directorate in advance by email (interpret@curia.europa.eu).
Prav tako jih je smiselno opozoriti na morebiti težko prevedljive izraze.
Any notes for submissions thus transmitted will be treated in the strictest confidence.
E. Zapisnik o obravnavi
In order to avoid any misunderstanding, the name of the party must be stated.
Sodni tajnik sestavi zapisnik o vsaki obravnavi v jeziku postopka, ki vsebuje: navedbo zadeve; dan, uro in kraj obravnave; po potrebi navedbo o tem, da gre za obravnavo, iz katere je javnost izključena; imena navzočih sodnikov in sodnega tajnika; imena in status navzočih zastopnikov strank; po potrebi navedbo stališč glede skrajšanega poročila za obravnavo; po potrebi priimke, imena, status in prebivališče zaslišanih prič ali izvedencev; po potrebi navedbo procesnih aktov ali dokazil, predloženih na obravnavi, ter kadar je to potrebno, izjave, podane na obravnavi, in odločitve, ki jih je na obravnavi razglasilo Splošno sodišče ali predsednik.
Notes for submissions will not be placed on the case file.
ZAUPNO OBRAVNAVANJE
Representatives are reminded that, depending on the case being heard, only some of the Members of the bench may be following the oral argument in the language in which it is being presented; the other Members will be listening to the simultaneous interpretation.
A. Splošne določbe
In the interests of the better conduct of the hearing and of maintaining the quality of the simultaneous interpretation, representatives are strongly advised to speak slowly and directly into the microphone.
V skladu s členom 64 in ob upoštevanju členov 68(4), 104, 105(8) in 144(7) Poslovnika Splošno sodišče upošteva le procesne akte in dokazila, s katerimi so se zastopniki strank lahko seznanili in glede katerih so se lahko izrekli.
Where representatives intend to cite verbatim passages from certain texts or documents, particularly passages not appearing in the case file, it would be helpful if they would indicate the passages concerned to the interpreters before the hearing.
Iz tega izhaja, da brez poseganja v člene od 103 do 105 Poslovnika predloga za zaupno obravnavanje nekaterih podatkov v spisu v zadevi, ki ga tožeča stranka vloži glede tožene stranke, ni mogoče upoštevati.
Similarly, it may be helpful to draw the interpreters' attention to any terms which may be difficult to translate.
Tožena stranka prav tako ne more vložiti takega predloga glede tožeče stranke.
E. Minutes of the hearing
Vendar lahko glavna stranka zahteva, da se nekateri podatki iz spisa v zadevi, ki so zaupni, v skladu s členom 144(7) Poslovnika intervenientu ne pošljejo.
The Registrar shall draw up in the respective language of each case the minutes of every hearing.
Vsaka stranka lahko tudi zahteva, da stranka v združenih zadevah nima vpogleda v nekatere podatke iz spisov, na katere se nanaša združitev, zaradi njihove zatrjevane zaupne narave v skladu s členom 68(4) Poslovnika.
Those minutes shall contain: an indication of the case; the date, time and place of the hearing; an indication, where applicable, that the case was heard in camera; the names of the Judges and the Registrar present; the names and status of the parties' representatives present; a reference to any observations on the summary report for the hearing; the surnames, forenames, status and permanent addresses of any witnesses or experts examined; an indication, where applicable, of the procedural documents or items produced at the hearing; and, in so far as is necessary, the statements made at the hearing and the decisions pronounced at the hearing by the Court or the President.
B. Zaupno obravnavanje v primeru predloga za intervencijo
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT
Če je v zadevi podan predlog za intervencijo, se glavne stranke pozove, naj v roku, ki ga določi sodni tajnik, navedejo, ali predlagajo zaupno obravnavanje nekaterih podatkov v procesnih aktih in dokazilih, ki so že bili vloženi v spis v zadevi.
A. General
Glavne stranke morajo za vse procesne akte in dokazila, ki jih vložijo pozneje, hkrati ob njihovi vložitvi po potrebi podati predlog za zaupno obravnavanje.
In accordance with Article 64 and subject to the provisions of Article 68(4), Article 104, Article 105(8) and Article 144(7) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court shall take into consideration only those procedural documents and items which have been made available to the representatives of the parties and on which they have been given an opportunity of expressing their views.
Če tak predlog ne bo podan, bodo vloženi procesni akti in dokazila poslani intervenientu.
It follows that, without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 103 to 105 of the Rules of Procedure, no consideration may be given to an application by the applicant for certain information on the case file to be treated as confidential in relation to the defendant.
Vsak predlog za zaupno obravnavanje je treba vložiti z ločeno vlogo.
Likewise, no such application may be made by the defendant in relation to the applicant.
Ta se ne sme vložiti v zaupni različici in zato ne sme vsebovati zaupnih podatkov.
Nevertheless, a main party may apply for certain confidential information on the case file to be excluded from the documents to be communicated to an intervener in accordance with Article 144(7) of the Rules of Procedure.
V predlogu za zaupno obravnavanje je treba navesti stranko, v razmerju do katere se predlaga zaupnost.
Each party may also request that a party to joined cases not be given access to certain information in the files concerned by the joinder on account of its alleged confidentiality, in accordance with Article 68(4) of the Rules of Procedure.
Predlog za zaupno obravnavanje je treba omejiti na najnujnejše in se nikakor ne sme nanašati na celoten procesni akt in, razen izjemoma, na celotno prilogo.
B. Confidential treatment where an application to intervene has been made
Po navadi je namreč mogoče posredovati nezaupno različico procesnega akta in dokazil, v kateri so izločeni nekateri odlomki, besede ali številke, ne da bi to vplivalo na zadevne interese.
Where an application to intervene is made in a case, the main parties are requested to state, within the time limit prescribed by the Registrar to that effect, whether they wish to seek confidential treatment in respect of certain information included in the procedural documents already placed on the case file.
V predlogu za zaupno obravnavanje je treba natančno navesti zadevne podatke ali odlomke, vsebovati pa mora tudi obrazložitev zaupnosti vsakega od teh podatkov ali odlomkov.
The main parties must submit simultaneously with any procedural document or item that they may lodge subsequently any application for confidential treatment that may be required in respect of the procedural document or item concerned.
Če teh navedb ni, lahko Splošno sodišče predlog zavrne.
In the absence of such an application, the procedural documents and items lodged will be communicated to the intervener.
Stranka mora ob vložitvi predloga za zaupno obravnavanje enega ali več procesnih aktov predložiti celotno nezaupno različico zadevnega ali zadevnih procesnih aktov in dokazil, iz katerih so bili izločeni podatki ali odlomki, na katere se nanaša predlog.
Any application for confidential treatment must be made by a separate document.
Če predlog za zaupno obravnavanje ni v skladu s točkami 179, 180 in 183 zgoraj, sodni tajnik od zadevne stranke zahteva njegovo dopolnitev.
It may not be lodged as a confidential version and must not, therefore, contain confidential information.
Če predlog za zaupno obravnavanje tudi po tej zahtevi ni v skladu z zahtevami iz teh praktičnih določb za izvajanje, ga ne bo mogoče ustrezno obravnavati, vsi zadevni procesni akti in dokazila pa bodo poslani intervenientu.
An application for confidential treatment must specify the party in relation to whom confidentiality is requested.
C. Zaupno obravnavanje v primeru združitve zadev
An application for confidential treatment must be limited to what is strictly necessary and may not in any event cover the entirety of a procedural document; only exceptionally may it extend to the entirety of an annexed document.
Če je predvidena združitev več zadev, se stranke pozove, naj v roku, ki ga določi sodni tajnik, navedejo, ali predlagajo zaupno obravnavanje nekaterih podatkov v procesnih aktih in dokazilih, ki so že bili vloženi v spisih v zadevah, na katere se nanaša združitev.
It should usually be possible to furnish a non-confidential version of a procedural document and items in which certain passages, words or figures have been deleted without affecting the interests it is sought to protect.
Stranke morajo za vse procesne akte in dokazila, ki jih vložijo pozneje, hkrati ob njihovi vložitvi po potrebi podati predlog za zaupno obravnavanje.
An application for confidential treatment must accurately identify the particulars or passages to be excluded and state the reasons for which each of those particulars or passages is regarded as confidential.
Če tak predlog ne bo podan, bodo vloženi procesni akti in dokazila postali dostopni drugim strankam v združenih zadevah.
Failure to provide such information may result in the application being refused by the Court.
Točke od 179 do 184 zgoraj se uporabljajo za predloge za zaupno obravnavanje, ki se vložijo v primeru združitve zadev.
On lodging an application for confidential treatment in respect of one or more procedural documents, a party must produce a full non-confidential version of each procedural document and item concerned, with the confidential particulars or passages removed.
D. Zaupno obravnavanje v okviru člena 103 Poslovnika
Where an application for confidential treatment does not comply with points 179, 180 and 183 above, the Registrar shall request the party concerned to put the application in order.
Splošno sodišče lahko na podlagi pripravljalnih ukrepov iz člena 91 Poslovnika stranki odredi predložitev podatkov ali dokazil v zvezi z zadevo.
If, despite such a request, the application for confidential treatment is not made to comply with the requirements of these Practice Rules, it will not be possible for it to be properly processed, and a copy of every procedural document and item concerned will be communicated to the intervener.
V skladu s členom 92(3) Poslovnika se lahko taka predložitev odredi le, če zadevna stranka ni izpolnila v ta namen predhodno sprejetega ukrepa procesnega vodstva ali če to zahteva stranka, ki jo zadeva ukrep in ki utemelji nujnost takega ukrepa v obliki sklepa o pripravljalnem ukrepu.
C. Confidential treatment where cases are joined
Če se glavna stranka sklicuje na zaupnost podatkov ali dokazil, da bi nasprotovala njihovemu pošiljanju v odgovor na predlog za izdajo ukrepa procesnega vodstva ali da bi predlagala izdajo pripravljalnega ukrepa, Splošno sodišče, če meni, da bi ti podatki ali dokazila lahko bili pomembni za odločitev o sporu, odredi njihovo predložitev s sklepom o pripravljalnem ukrepu na podlagi člena 91(b) Poslovnika.
Where it is envisaged that several cases will be joined, the parties are requested to state, within the time limit prescribed by the Registrar to that effect, whether they wish to seek confidential treatment in respect of certain information included in the procedural documents and material already placed on the files of the cases concerned by the joinder.
Obravnavanje zaupnih podatkov ali dokazil, ki so tako predloženi pred Splošnim sodiščem, ureja člen 103 Poslovnika.
The parties must submit simultaneously with any procedural document or item that they may lodge subsequently any application for confidential treatment that may be required in respect of the procedural document or item concerned.
Zadevna ureditev ne določa nobenega odstopanja od načela kontradiktornosti postopka, temveč določa podrobna pravila za njegovo izvajanje.
In the absence of such an application, the procedural documents and items lodged will be made available to the other parties in the joined cases.
Splošno sodišče na podlagi te določbe preuči, ali so podatki ali dokazila pomembni za odločitev o sporu, in preveri njihovo zaupnost.
Points 179 to 184 above shall apply to applications for confidential treatment submitted where cases are joined.
Če Splošno sodišče meni, da so zadevne informacije pomembne za odločitev o sporu in hkrati zaupne, njihovo zaupno naravo pretehta z zahtevami, povezanimi s pravico do učinkovitega sodnega varstva, zlasti s spoštovanjem načela kontradiktornosti, in ima na koncu te presoje dve izbiri.
D. Confidential treatment under Article 103 of the Rules of Procedure
Splošno sodišče lahko odloči, da s podatkom ali dokazilom kljub njegovi zaupnosti seznani nasprotno glavno stranko.
The Court may, pursuant to the measures of inquiry referred to in Article 91 of the Rules of Procedure, order a party to produce information or material relating to the case.
Splošno sodišče lahko v zvezi s tem z ukrepom procesnega vodstva zastopnike strank, ki niso stranka, ki je predložila zaupne podatke, pozove k podpisu sporazuma o varovanju zaupnosti dokumenta ali dokazila, tako da podatkov, s katerimi so se seznanili, ne bodo posredovali svojim pooblastiteljem ali tretjim osebam.
In accordance with Article 92(3) of the Rules of Procedure, such production may be ordered only where the party concerned has not complied with a measure of organisation of procedure previously adopted to that end, or where expressly requested by the party concerned by the measure and that party explains the need for such a measure to be in the form of an order for a measure of inquiry.
Za vse kršitve tega sporazuma je mogoče uporabiti člen 55 Poslovnika.
Where a main party submits in his response to an application for a measure of organisation of procedure that certain information or material is confidential and he therefore objects to its transmission or proposes that a measure of inquiry be adopted, the Court shall, if it considers that that information or material may be relevant in order for it to rule in the case, order its production by means of an order for a measure of inquiry under Article 91(b) of the Rules of Procedure.
Alternativno lahko Splošno sodišče odloči, da zaupnih podatkov ne posreduje, nasprotni glavni stranki pa omogoči, da ima na voljo nezaupne podatke, da lahko kar najbolje uveljavlja svoja stališča v skladu z načelom kontradiktornosti.
The treatment of confidential information or material thus produced before the Court shall be governed by Article 103 of the Rules of Procedure.
Splošno sodišče zato odredi glavni stranki, ki je predložila zaupne podatke, da posreduje nekatere informacije na način, ki omogoča uskladitev varovanja zaupnosti podatkov in kontradiktornosti postopka.
The regime in question does not provide for any derogation from the principle of the adversarial nature of the proceedings, but lays down the rules for the implementation of that principle.
Informacijo bo mogoče na primer posredovati v skrajšani obliki.
In accordance with that provision, the Court shall examine the relevance of the information or material to the outcome of the proceedings and verify the confidential nature of that information or material.
Če Splošno sodišče meni, da nasprotna glavna stranka ne more učinkovito uresničevati pravice do obrambe, lahko sprejme sklep, celo več sklepov, vse dokler ne meni, da je mogoče postopek učinkovito nadaljevati kontradiktorno.
If it considers that the information concerned is both relevant to the outcome of the proceedings and confidential, the Court shall weigh that confidentiality against the requirements linked to the right to effective judicial protection, particularly observance of the adversarial principle, and, after weighing up those matters, will have two options.
Če Splošno sodišče meni, da je posredovanje informacije nasprotni glavni stranki, ki je bilo zagotovljeno na načine, določene s sklepom, sprejetim na podlagi člena 103(3) Poslovnika, tej stranki omogočilo, da kar najbolje uveljavlja svoja stališča, Splošno sodišče zaupnih podatkov ali dokazil, s katerimi se ta stranka ni seznanila, ne upošteva.
The Court may decide that the information or material must be brought to the attention of the other main party, notwithstanding its confidential nature.
Zaupni podatki ali dokazila se izločijo iz spisa, o čemer so stranke obveščene.
In that respect, the Court may, by way of a measure of organisation of procedure, request the representatives of the parties other than the party who produced the confidential information to give an undertaking to preserve the confidentiality of the document or item by not communicating to their respective clients or to a third party the information that is to be disclosed to them.
E. Zaupno obravnavanje v okviru člena 104 Poslovnika
Any breach of that undertaking may result in Article 55 of the Rules of Procedure being applied.
Splošno sodišče lahko v okviru nadzora nad zakonitostjo akta institucije, s katerim je ta zavrnila dostop do dokumenta, odredi predložitev tega dokumenta s pripravljalnim ukrepom, sprejetim na podlagi člena 91(c) Poslovnika.
Alternatively, the Court may decide not to communicate the confidential information, whilst nevertheless ensuring that the other main party is provided with non-confidential information so that he can, to the greatest extent possible, make his views known in compliance with the adversarial principle.
Dokument, ki ga predloži institucija, se ne posreduje drugim strankam, saj bi s tem spor postal brezpredmeten.
The Court shall then order the main party who produced the confidential information to communicate certain particulars in such a way as to enable the preservation of the confidentiality of the information to be reconciled with the adversarial nature of the proceedings.
F. Zaupno obravnavanje v okviru člena 105 Poslovnika
It will, for example, be possible for the information to be transmitted in summarised form.
V skladu s členom 105(1) in (2) Poslovnika lahko glavna stranka v sporu prostovoljno ali na podlagi pripravljalnega ukrepa Splošnega sodišča predloži podatke ali dokazila, ki se nanašajo na varnost Evropske unije ali varnost ene ali več njenih držav članic ali na vodenje njihovih mednarodnih odnosov.
If the Court considers that the other main party cannot properly exercise his rights of defence, it may make one or more orders, until it considers that the proceedings can properly be continued on an adversarial basis.
Odstavki od 3 do 10 tega člena določajo postopkovno ureditev, ki se uporablja za take podatke ali dokazila.
Where the Court considers that the communication of information to the other main party in accordance with the procedures prescribed by the order made under Article 103(3) of the Rules of Procedure has enabled that party to present his views effectively, the confidential information or material which has not been brought to the attention of that party shall not be taken into consideration by the Court.
Upoštevajoč občutljivost in zaupnost podatkov ali dokazil, ki se nanašajo na varnost Unije ali varnost ene ali več njenih držav članic ali na vodenje njihovih mednarodnih odnosov, je za izvajanje ureditve, vzpostavljene s členom 105 Poslovnika, potrebna vzpostavitev ustrezne varovalke, da se zagotovi visoka raven varstva teh podatkov ali dokazil.
The confidential information or material shall be removed from the file, and the parties informed accordingly.
To varovalko je Splošno sodišče določilo v odločbi z dne 14. septembra 2016.