natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 39 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 provides that an additional import duty as referred to in Article 182(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 may be applied to the products and during the periods listed in Annex VII to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892.
Člen 39 Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2017/892 določa, da se dodatna uvozna dajatev iz člena 182(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 lahko uporablja za proizvode in v obdobjih iz Priloge VII k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) 2017/892.
That additional import duty has to apply if the quantity of any of the products put into free circulation for any of the periods of application set out in that Annex exceeds the trigger volume of imports in a year for that product.
Navedeno dodatno uvozno dajatev je treba uporabljati, če količina katerega koli od proizvodov, sproščenih v prosti promet za katero koli obdobje uporabe, določeno v navedeni prilogi, presega sprožitveno količino uvoza v katerem koli letu za navedeni proizvod.
Additional import duties shall not be imposed where the imports are unlikely to disturb the Union market, or where the effects would be disproportionate to the intended objective.
Dodatnih uvoznih dajatev ni, kadar ni verjetno, da bi uvoz povzročil motnje na trgu Unije, ali kadar bi bile posledice nesorazmerne z zastavljenim ciljem.
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 182(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 the trigger volumes of imports for the possible application of additional import duties on certain fruit and vegetables are based on import data and domestic consumption data for the previous three years.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 182(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 sprožitvene količine uvoza za morebitno uporabo dodatnih uvoznih dajatev za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave temeljijo na podatkih o uvozu in podatkih o domači porabi za pretekla tri leta.
On the basis of the data notified by the Member States for the years 2015, 2016 and 2017, the trigger volumes for certain fruit and vegetables should be fixed for the years 2019 and 2020.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki jih uradno sporočijo države članice za leta 2015, 2016 in 2017, bi bilo treba sprožitvene količine za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave določiti za leti 2019 in 2020.
Taking into account that the period of application of possible additional import duties as set out in Annex VII to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 starts for a number of products on 1 January, this Regulation should apply from 1 January 2019 and therefore it should enter into force as soon as possible,
Ob upoštevanju, da se obdobje uporabe morebitnih dodatnih uvoznih dajatev, kakor je določeno v Prilogi VII k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) 2017/892, za številne proizvode začne 1. januarja, bi bilo treba to uredbo uporabljati od 1. januarja 2019 in bi zato morala začeti veljati čim prej –
For the years 2019 and 2020, the trigger volumes referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 182(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 for the products listed in Annex VII to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 are set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Za leti 2019 in 2020 so sprožitvene količine iz točke (b) prvega pododstavka člena 182(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 za proizvode iz Priloge VII k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) 2017/892 določene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
It shall expire on 30 June 2020.
Veljati preneha 30. junija 2020.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 of 13 March 2017 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (OJ L 138, 25.5.2017, p. 57).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/892 z dne 13. marca 2017 o določitvi pravil za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi s sektorjema sadja in zelenjave ter predelanega sadja in zelenjave (UL L 138, 25.5.2017, str. 57).
Trigger volumes for the products and periods set out in Annex VII to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892, for the possible application of additional import duties
Sprožitvene količine za proizvode in v obdobjih iz Priloge VII k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) 2017/892, za morebitno uporabo dodatnih uvoznih dajatev
Without prejudice to the rules on the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, the description of the products is deemed to be indicative only.
Brez poseganja v pravila glede interpretacije kombinirane nomenklature je treba poimenovanje proizvodov razumeti le okvirno.
For the purposes of this Annex, the scope of the additional import duties is determined by the scope of the CN codes as they stand at the time of adoption of this Regulation.
Za namene te priloge je področje uporabe dodatnih uvoznih dajatev določeno s področjem uporabe oznak KN, kakršne obstajajo ob sprejetju te uredbe.
Trigger volume (tonnes)
Sprožitvena količina (v tonah)
From 1 October
Od 1. oktobra
to 31 May
do 31. maja
From 1 November
Od 1. novembra
to 30 April
do 30. aprila
to 30 June
do 30. junija
From 1 January to 31 December
Od 1. januarja do 31. decembra
From 1 December
Od 1. decembra
to end of February
do konca februarja
Mandarins (including tangerines and satsumas); wilkings and similar citrus hybrids
Mandarine (vključno tangerine in satsume); mandarine wilking in podobni hibridi agrumov
From 1 January to 31 May
Od 1. januarja do 31. maja
From 16 July to 16 November
Od 16. julija do 16. novembra
From 1 September to 31 December
Od 1. septembra do 31. decembra
From 1 January to 30 April
Od 1. januarja do 30. aprila
Cherries other than sour
Češnje, razen višenj
From 16 May to 15 August
Od 16. maja do 15. avgusta
From 16 June to 30 September
Od 16. junija do 30. septembra
Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2018/1805 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders
o vzajemnem priznavanju sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 82(1)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti točke (a) člena 82(1) Pogodbe,
The Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
Unija si je zadala cilj ohranjanja in razvijanja območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
Judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the Union is based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions, which has commonly been referred to as the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the Union since the Tampere European Council of 15 and 16 October 1999.
Pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah v Uniji temelji na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in sodnih odločb, ki je od zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 na splošno znano kot temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah v Uniji.
The freezing and the confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime are among the most effective means of combatting crime.
Začasno zavarovanje in odvzem predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, in premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, spadata med najučinkovitejše načine boja proti kaznivim dejanjem.
The Union is committed to ensuring more effective identification, confiscation and re-use of criminal assets in accordance with ‘The Stockholm programme — An open and secure Europe serving and protecting the citizens’.
Unija je zavezana zagotavljanju učinkovitejšega odkrivanja, odvzema in ponovne uporabe sredstev, pridobljenih s kaznivimi dejanji, v skladu s „Stockholmskim programom – odprta in varna Evropa, ki služi državljanom in jih varuje“.
As crime is often transnational in nature, effective cross-border cooperation is essential in order to freeze and confiscate the instrumentalities and proceeds of crime.
Ker so kazniva dejanja pogosto nadnacionalna, je za začasno zavarovanje in odvzem predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, in premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, bistvenega pomena učinkovito čezmejno sodelovanje.
The current Union legal framework in relation to the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders is composed of Council Framework Decisions 2003/577/JHA and 2006/783/JHA.
Sedanji pravni okvir Unije za vzajemno priznavanje sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu predstavljata okvirna sklepa Sveta 2003/577/PNZ in 2006/783/PNZ.
The Commission's implementation reports on Framework Decisions 2003/577/JHA and 2006/783/JHA show that the existing regime for the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders is not fully effective.
Iz poročil Komisije o izvajanju okvirnih sklepov 2003/577/PNZ in 2006/783/PNZ je razvidno, da sedanji sistem za vzajemno priznavanje sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu ni v celoti učinkovit.
Those Framework Decisions have not been implemented and applied uniformly in the Member States, which has led to insufficient mutual recognition and sub-optimal cross-border cooperation.
Navedena okvirna sklepa se v državah članicah ne izvajata in uporabljata enotno, kar povzroča pomanjkljivo vzajemno priznavanje in neoptimalno čezmejno sodelovanje.
The Union legal framework on mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders has not kept up with recent legislative developments at Union and national levels.
Pravni okvir Unije za vzajemno priznavanje sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu ni sledil nedavnemu razvoju zakonodaje na ravni Unije in na nacionalni ravni.
In particular, Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishes minimum rules on the freezing and the confiscation of property.
Zlasti Direktiva 2014/42/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta določa minimalna pravila o začasnem zavarovanju in odvzemu premoženja.
Those minimum rules concern the confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime, including in the cases of illness or absconding of the suspect or accused person, where criminal proceedings have already been initiated regarding a criminal offence, extended confiscation and confiscation from a third party.
Ta minimalna pravila se nanašajo na odvzem predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, in premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, tudi v primeru bolezni ali bega osumljenca ali obdolženca, kadar se je kazenski postopek v zvezi s kaznivim dejanjem že začel, razširjeni odvzem in odvzem tretji osebi.
Those minimum rules also concern the freezing of property with a view to possible subsequent confiscation.
Poleg tega se ta minimalna pravila nanašajo tudi na začasno zavarovanje premoženja zaradi morebitnega poznejšega odvzema.
The types of freezing orders and confiscation orders covered by that Directive should also be included in the legal framework on mutual recognition.
Vrste sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu, ki jih zajema navedena direktiva, bi moral zajemati tudi pravni okvir za vzajemno priznavanje.
When adopting Directive 2014/42/EU, the European Parliament and the Council stated in a declaration that an effective system of freezing and confiscation in the Union is inherently linked to the well-functioning mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders.
Evropski parlament in Svet sta ob sprejetju Direktive 2014/42/EU v izjavi navedla, da je učinkovit sistem za začasno zavarovanje in odvzem v Uniji neločljivo povezan z dobro delujočim vzajemnim priznavanjem sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu.
Considering the need to put in place a comprehensive system for the freezing and confiscation of the instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the Union, the European Parliament and the Council called on the Commission to present a legislative proposal on the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders.
Glede na dejstvo, da je treba v Uniji vzpostaviti celovit sistem za začasno zavarovanje in odvzem predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, in premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, sta pozvala Komisijo, naj predstavi zakonodajni predlog o vzajemnem priznavanju sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu.
In its communication of 28 April 2015 entitled ‘The European Agenda on Security’, the Commission considered that judicial cooperation in criminal matters relies on effective cross-border instruments and that the mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions is a key element in the security framework.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu z dne 28. aprila 2015 z naslovom „Evropska agenda za varnost“ navedla, da pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah temelji na učinkovitih čezmejnih instrumentih ter da je vzajemno priznavanje sodb in sodnih odločb ključni element varnostnega okvira.
The Commission also recalled the need to improve the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders.
Ponovno je tudi poudarila, da je treba izboljšati vzajemno priznavanje sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu.
In its communication of 2 February 2016 on an Action Plan for strengthening the fight against terrorist financing, the Commission highlighted the need to ensure that criminals who fund terrorism are deprived of their assets.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu z dne 2. februarja 2016 o akcijskem načrtu za okrepitev boja proti financiranju terorizma poudarila, da je treba zagotoviti, da se storilcem kaznivih dejanj, ki financirajo terorizem, odvzamejo sredstva.
The Commission stated that, in order to disrupt organised crime activities that finance terrorism, it is essential to deprive those criminals of the proceeds of crime.
Navedla je, da je za onemogočanje dejavnosti organiziranega kriminala, s katerimi se financira terorizem, bistveno, da se tem storilcem kaznivih dejanj odvzame premoženjska korist, pridobljena s kaznivim dejanjem.
To that end, the Commission stated that it is necessary to ensure that all types of freezing orders and confiscation orders are enforced to the maximum extent possible throughout the Union by the application of the principle of mutual recognition.
Zato je glede na navedbo Komisije treba z uporabo načela vzajemnega priznavanja zagotoviti, da se vse vrste sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu izvršijo v čim večjem obsegu po vsej Uniji.
In order to ensure the effective mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders, the rules on the recognition and execution of those orders should be established by a legally binding and directly applicable act of the Union.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega vzajemnega priznavanja sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu bi bilo treba s pravno zavezujočim pravnim aktom Unije, ki se neposredno uporablja, določiti pravila o priznavanju in izvrševanju teh sklepov.
It is important to facilitate the mutual recognition and execution of freezing orders and confiscation orders by establishing rules that oblige a Member State to recognise, without further formalities, the freezing orders and confiscation orders issued by another Member State within the framework of proceedings in criminal matters and to execute those orders within its territory.
Pomembno je olajšati vzajemno priznavanje in izvrševanje sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu premoženja, in sicer z določitvijo pravil, ki obvezujejo državo članico, da brez nadaljnjih formalnosti prizna sklepe o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepe o odvzemu, ki jih izda druga država članica v okviru postopkov v kazenskih zadevah, ter izvrši te sklepe na svojem ozemlju.
This Regulation should apply to all freezing orders and to all confiscation orders issued within the framework of proceedings in criminal matters.
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati za vse sklepe o začasnem zavarovanju in vse sklepe o odvzemu, izdane v okviru postopkov v kazenskih zadevah.
‘Proceedings in criminal matters’ is an autonomous concept of Union law interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union, notwithstanding the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
„Postopki v kazenskih zadevah“ je avtonomen pojem v pravu Unije, kot ga razlaga Sodišče Evropske unije, ne glede na sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
The term therefore covers all types of freezing orders and confiscation orders issued following proceedings in relation to a criminal offence, not only orders covered by Directive 2014/42/EU.
Ta pojem zato zajema vse vrste sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in vse vrste sklepov o odvzemu, izdane v okviru postopkov v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, torej ne samo sklepov, ki jih ureja Direktiva 2014/42/EU.
It also covers other types of order issued without a final conviction.
Zajema tudi druge vrste sklepov, ki so bili izdani brez pravnomočne obsodbe.
While such orders might not exist in the legal system of a Member State, the Member State concerned should be able to recognise and execute such an order issued by another Member State.
Tudi če takšni sklepi v pravnem sistemu države članice ne obstajajo, bi moralo biti dopustno, da zadevna država članica prizna in izvrši takšen sklep, ki ga je izdala druga država članica.
Proceedings in criminal matters could also encompass criminal investigations by the police and other law enforcement authorities.
Med postopke v kazenskih zadevah bi bile lahko vključene tudi kazenske preiskave, ki jih opravljajo policija in drugi organi preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj.
Freezing orders and confiscation orders that are issued within the framework of proceedings in civil or administrative matters should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Sklepi o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepi o odvzemu, izdani v postopkih v civilnih ali upravnih zadevah, bi morali biti izključeni s področja uporabe te uredbe.
This Regulation should cover freezing orders and confiscation orders related to criminal offences covered by Directive 2014/42/EU, as well as freezing orders and confiscation orders related to other criminal offences.
Ta uredba bi morala zajemati sklepe o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepe o odvzemu v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, ki jih zajema Direktiva 2014/42/EU, ter sklepe o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepe o odvzemu v zvezi z drugimi kaznivimi dejanji.
The criminal offences covered by this Regulation should therefore not be limited to particularly serious crimes that have a cross-border dimension, as Article 82 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) does not require such a limitation for measures laying down rules and procedures for ensuring the mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters.
Zato kazniva dejanja, ki jih zajema ta uredba, ne bi smela biti omejena na posebno huda kazniva dejanja, ki imajo čezmejno razsežnost, saj člen 82 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) ne zahteva takšne omejitve za ukrepe, ki določajo pravila in postopke za zagotovitev vzajemnega priznavanja sodb v kazenskih zadevah.
Cooperation between Member States, which is based on the principle of mutual recognition and the immediate execution of judicial decisions, presupposes confidence that the decisions to be recognised and executed will always be taken in compliance with the principles of legality, subsidiarity and proportionality.
Za sodelovanje med državami članicami, ki temelji na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja in takojšnji izvršitvi sodnih odločb, je predpogoj zaupanje, da bodo odločbe, ki jih je treba priznati in izvršiti, vedno sprejete v skladu z načeli zakonitosti, subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti.
Such cooperation also presupposes that the rights of persons who are affected by a freezing order or confiscation order should be preserved.
Predpogoj za takšno sodelovanje je tudi, da se ohranijo pravice oseb, na katere vpliva sklep o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklep o odvzemu.
Such affected persons, who can be natural persons or legal persons, should include the person against whom a freezing order or confiscation order was issued or the person who owns the property that is covered by that order, as well as any third parties whose rights in relation to that property are directly prejudiced by that order, including bona fide third parties.
To so lahko fizične ali pravne osebe, mednje pa bi morale biti uvrščene oseba, zoper katero je bil izdan sklep o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklep o odvzemu, ali oseba, ki je lastnica premoženja, zajetega v sklepu, pa tudi vse tretje osebe – vključno s tretjimi osebami, ki ravnajo v dobri veri –, v katerih pravice do zadevnega premoženja ta sklep neposredno posega.
Whether such third parties are directly prejudiced by a freezing order or confiscation order, should be decided in accordance with the law of the executing State.
O tem, ali sklep o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklep o odvzemu neposredno posega v pravice takšnih tretjih oseb, se odloči v skladu s pravom države izvršiteljice.
This Regulation does not modify the obligation to respect fundamental rights and legal principles enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Ta uredba ne spreminja obveznosti spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in pravnih načel, kot so določeni v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’) and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the ‘ECHR’).
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina) in Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP).
This includes the principle that any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion, sexual orientation, nationality, language, political opinion, or disability is to be prohibited.
To vključuje načelo, da je prepovedana vsakršna diskriminacija na podlagi spola, rasnega ali etničnega porekla, vere, spolne usmerjenosti, državljanstva, jezika, političnega stališča ali invalidnosti.
The procedural rights set out in Directives 2010/64/EU, 2012/13/EU, 2013/48/EU, (EU) 2016/343, (EU) 2016/800 and (EU) 2016/1919 of the European Parliament and of the Council should apply, within the scope of those Directives, to criminal proceedings covered by this Regulation as regards the Member States bound by those Directives.
Države članice, ki jih zavezujejo direktive 2010/64/EU, 2012/13/EU, 2013/48/EU, (EU) 2016/343, (EU) 2016/800 in (EU) 2016/1919 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, bi morale v kazenskih postopkih, zajetih v tej uredbi, upoštevati v njih določene procesne pravice.
In any case, the safeguards under the Charter should apply to all proceedings covered by this Regulation.
Vsekakor pa bi se morala v vseh postopkih, zajetih v tej uredbi, uporabljati jamstva iz Listine.
In particular, the essential safeguards for criminal proceedings set out in the Charter should apply to proceedings in criminal matters that are not criminal proceedings but which are covered by this Regulation.
Zlasti bi se morala uporabljati bistvena jamstva v kazenskih postopkih, določena v Listini, v tistih postopkih v kazenskih zadevah, ki niso kazenski postopki, a so zajeti v tej uredbi.
While the rules for the transmission, recognition and execution of freezing orders and confiscation orders should ensure the efficiency of the process of recovering criminal assets, fundamental rights are to be respected.
Pravila o posredovanju, priznavanju in izvrševanju sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu bi sicer morala zagotavljati učinkovitost postopka odvzema sredstev, pridobljenih s kaznivim dejanjem, vendar je treba spoštovati temeljne pravice.