natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Pitina’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je bil zahtevek Italije za registracijo imena „Pitina“ objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014.
V Bruslju, 19. junija 2018
Done at Brussels, 19 June 2018.
UL L 343, 14.12.2012, str. 1.
For the Commission,
UL C 23, 23.1.2018, str. 8.
On behalf of the President,
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 z dne 13. junija 2014 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in živil (UL L 179, 19.6.2014, str. 36).
Member of the Commission
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.
Ker v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Komisija ni prejela nobenega ugovora, bi bilo treba ime „Pitina“ registrirati –
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/931
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/931
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of oxalic acid originating in India and the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Indije in Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (‘the basic Regulation’) and, in particular, Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(2) Uredbe,
Following an anti-dumping investigation (‘the original investigation’), the Council imposed, by means of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 325/2012 a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of oxalic acid originating in India and the People's Republic of China (‘countries concerned’).
Svet je po protidampinški preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 325/2012 uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Indije in Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevni državi“).
Following the judgment of the General Court of 20 May 2015, the measures were annulled in so far as they concerned the Chinese exporting producer Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd (‘Yuanping’).
Po sodbi Splošnega sodišča z dne 20. maja 2015 so bili ukrepi razglašeni za nične v delu, ki se je nanašal na kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd („družba Yuanping“).
Following the implementation of that judgment, the Commission re-imposed anti-dumping measures on imports of the product concerned by Yuanping with effect from 30 November 2016.
Komisija je po izvršitvi navedene sodbe ponovno uvedla protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvaja družba Yuanping, z učinkom od 30. novembra 2016.
The existing measures take the form of an ad valorem duty between 14,6 % and 52,2 % on imports from the countries concerned.
Obstoječi ukrepi imajo obliko dajatve ad valorem v višini med 14,6 % in 52,2 % na uvoz iz zadevnih držav.
Concerning the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’), duties range from 14,6 % to 37,7 % for Chinese cooperating companies.
Kar zadeva Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko („LRK“), dajatve za kitajske sodelujoče družbe znašajo od 14,6 % do 37,7 %.
The country-wide dumping duty is 52,2 %.
Protidampinška dajatev na ravni države znaša 52,2 %.
Concerning India, the duties range from 22,8 % to 31,5 % for the cooperating companies.
Kar zadeva Indijo, dajatve za sodelujoče družbe znašajo od 22,8 % do 31,5 %.
The country-wide duty is 43,6 %.
Dajatev na ravni države znaša 43,6 %.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry of the anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an expiry review of the measures against the countries concerned, pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov proti zadevnima državama v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged on 18 January 2017 by Oxaquim SA (‘the applicant’) representing more than 50 % of the total Union production of oxalic acid.
Zahtevek je 18. januarja 2017 vložila družba Oxaquim S.A. („vložnik“), ki predstavlja več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje oksalne kisline v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would likely result in continuation of dumping and recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi iztek ukrepov verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje dampinga in ponovitev škode za industrijo Unije.
Having determined that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced, on 12 April 2017, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation (‘Notice of Initiation’).
Komisija je po ugotovitvi, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov, 12. aprila 2017 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe („obvestilo o začetku“).
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava glede verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2016 do 31. marca 2017 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to the end of the RIP (the ‘period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2013 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The Commission officially advised the applicant, the other known Union producer, the known exporting producers in the countries concerned, the known importers, the users and traders known to be concerned, known associations representing Union producers and users and the representatives of the exporting countries of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila vložnika, drugega znanega proizvajalca Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike v zadevnih državah, znane uvoznike, uporabnike in trgovce, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, znana združenja, ki zastopajo proizvajalce in uporabnike iz Unije, ter predstavnike držav izvoznic.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, zahtevati zaslišanje.
No interested party requested a hearing.
Zaslišanja ni zahtevala nobena zainteresirana stran.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample interested parties in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo morda izbrala vzorec zainteresiranih strani v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known exporting producers in India and the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse znane proizvajalce izvoznike iz Indije in LRK pozvala, naj zagotovijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
In addition, the Commission asked the missions of India and the PRC to the Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Poleg tega je Komisija pozvala predstavništvi Indije in LRK pri Uniji, naj navedeta morebitne druge proizvajalce izvoznike, ki bi jih lahko zanimalo sodelovanje v preiskavi, in/ali vzpostavita stik z njimi.
Three exporting producers in India provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Trije proizvajalci izvozniki iz Indije so predložili zahtevane informacije in se strinjali z vključitvijo v vzorec.
Therefore, sampling was not necessary and the Commission sent the questionnaire to all three companies.
Vzorčenje zato ni bilo potrebno in Komisija je vsem trem družbam poslala vprašalnik.
However, only two Indian companies provided a reply to the questionnaire.
Vendar sta vprašalnik izpolnili le dve indijski družbi.
No company from the PRC came forward.
Odzvala se ni nobena družba iz LRK.
The Commission informed the Chinese authorities by means of a Note Verbale on 18 May 2017 that it had not received any cooperation from exporting producers in the PRC.
Komisija je kitajske organe 18. maja 2017 z verbalno noto obvestila, da se za sodelovanje ni odločil noben proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK.
It therefore intended to base its findings for the exporting producers in the PRC on the facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zato je nameravala svoje ugotovitve za proizvajalce izvoznike iz LRK sprejeti na podlagi dostopnih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Oxalic acid was manufactured by only two producers in the Union during the period considered.
Oksalno kislino sta v obravnavanem obdobju proizvajala le dva proizvajalca Unije.
Thus no sampling of Union producers was necessary.
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev Unije zato ni bilo potrebno.
Although questionnaires were sent to both companies, only the applicant provided a questionnaire reply.
Vprašalnik je bil poslan obema družbama, vendar ga je izpolnil le vložnik.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse znane nepovezane uvoznike pozvala, naj zagotovijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
Seven companies replied to the sampling form.
Obrazec za vzorčenje je izpolnilo sedem družb.
Only one of them indicated that it had imported oxalic acid from the countries concerned.
Le ena je navedla, da je oksalno kislino uvažala iz zadevnih držav.
Due to this limited number of companies, sampling was not considered necessary.
Zaradi tega omejenega števila družb se vzorčenje ni štelo za potrebno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the two known Union producers, to three Indian exporting producers, to all known users and seven unrelated importers who have replied to the sampling form.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala obema znanima proizvajalcema Unije, trem indijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, vsem znanim uporabnikom in sedmim nepovezanim uvoznikom, ki so izpolnili obrazec za vzorčenje.
Questionnaire replies were received from two Indian exporting producers, one Union producer and five users.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je prejela od dveh indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, enega proizvajalca Unije in petih uporabnikov.
Oxaquim SA, Spain
Oxaquim S.A., Španija;
Exporting producers:
proizvajalca izvoznika:
Ltd, India (‘Star Oxochem’)
Ltd., Indija („družba Star Oxochem“),
Ltd, India (‘Radiant’).
Ltd., Indija („družba Radiant“).
The product concerned is oxalic acid, whether in dihydrate (CUS number 0028635-1 and CAS number 6153-56-6) or anhydrous form (CUS number 0021238-4 and CAS number 144-62-7) and whether or not in aqueous solution, currently falling within CN code ex29171100 (TARIC code 2917110091) and originating in India and the PRC (‘product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek je oksalna kislina v dihidratni (številka CUS 0028635-1 in številka CAS 6153-56-6) ali anhidridni obliki (številka CUS 0021238-4 in številka CAS 144-62-7) in v vodni raztopini ali ne, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex29171100 (oznaka TARIC 2917110091), ter s poreklom iz Indije in LRK („zadevni izdelek“).
In the original investigation, it was found that there are two types of oxalic acid; unrefined oxalic acid and refined oxalic acid.
V prvotni preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da obstajata dve vrsti oksalne kisline; nerafinirana oksalna kislina in rafinirana oksalna kislina.
Refined oxalic acid, which was produced in the PRC but not in India, is manufactured through a purification process of unrefined oxalic acid, the purpose of which is to remove iron, chlorides, metal traces and other impurities.
Rafinirana oksalna kislina, ki se je proizvajala v LRK, v Indiji pa ne, se proizvaja s postopkom čiščenja nerafinirane oksalne kisline, katerega namen je odstranitev železa, kloridov, sledi kovin in drugih nečistot.
In the absence of cooperation from the PRC it was assumed for the current review investigation that exporting producers in the PRC manufactured and exported refined oxalic acid as in the original investigation.
Zaradi nesodelovanja LRK se je za sedanjo preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom predvidevalo, da proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK proizvajajo in izvažajo rafinirano oksalno kislino, kot je bilo ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi.
Oxalic acid produced and sold by the Union industry in the Union, oxalic acid produced and sold on the domestic market of India and the PRC and oxalic acid imported into the Union from India and the PRC have essentially the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and the same basic end uses.
Oksalna kislina, ki jo industrija Unije proizvaja in prodaja v Uniji, oksalna kislina, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu v Indiji in LRK, ter oksalna kislina, ki je uvožena v Unijo iz Indije in LRK, imajo v bistvu enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter enake osnovne končne uporabe.
Therefore, these products are alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ti izdelki so si zato podobni v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping from Indian and Chinese exporting producers.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi iztek obstoječih ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga indijskih in kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
During the RIP, exports to the Union of oxalic acid from the PRC and India continued albeit at lower volumes than in the investigation period of the original investigation (from 1 January to 31 December 2010).
Izvoz oksalne kisline iz LRK in Indije v Unijo se je med OPP nadaljeval, čeprav v manjšem obsegu kot v obdobju prvotne preiskave (od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2010).
According to Eurostat data, Chinese and Indian imports of oxalic acid entering the Union accounted for around 16 % of the market in the RIP.
Glede na podatke Eurostata je oksalna kislina, ki se je iz Kitajske in Indije uvažala v Unijo, v OPP predstavljala približno 16 % trga.
There are four known producers of oxalic acid in India, of which two provided a reply to the questionnaire.
V Indiji so štirje znani proizvajalci oksalne kisline, od katerih sta dva izpolnila vprašalnik.
On the basis of the information at its disposal, the Commission estimated total production in India at around 30000 metric tonnes.
Komisija je na podlagi informacij, ki jih je imela na voljo, celotno proizvodnjo v Indiji ocenila na približno 30000 metričnih ton.
Total exports from India are estimated at around 9000 metric tonnes, based on Indian government data for 2016-2017.
Celotni izvoz iz Indije je na podlagi podatkov indijske vlade za obdobje 2016–2017 ocenjen na približno 9000 metričnih ton.
The imports from India to the Union in the RIP were limited and amounted to around 800 to 900 tonnes, based on Eurostat and Indian government data.
Na podlagi podatkov Eurostata in podatkov indijske vlade je bil uvoz iz Indije v Unijo v OPP majhen in je znašal približno 800–900 ton.
The two cooperating Indian producers had very limited Union sales, following a drop since the imposition of the measures.
Prodaja obeh sodelujočih indijskih proizvajalcev v Uniji je bila po zmanjšanju od uvedbe ukrepov zelo majhna.
The main exporting producer from India during the RIP was the company that stopped its cooperation by not replying to the questionnaire.
V OPP je bila glavni proizvajalec izvoznik iz Indije družba, ki je prekinila sodelovanje, ko ni izpolnila vprašalnika.
Imports from India are also subject to the 6,5 % CCT duty.
Za uvoz iz Indije velja tudi 6,5-odstotna dajatev skupne carinske tarife.
Dumping in the review investigation period
Damping v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
The Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales of the two cooperating Indian companies was representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali je celotni obseg domače prodaje obeh sodelujočih indijskih družb reprezentativen.
The domestic sales are representative if the total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers on the domestic market per exporting producer represented at least 5 % of its total export sales volume of the product under review to the Union during the RIP.
Domača prodaja je reprezentativna, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu na proizvajalca izvoznika v OPP predstavljal vsaj 5 % njegovega celotnega obsega izvoza izdelka, ki se pregleduje, v Unijo.
On this basis, the total sales of the two cooperating exporting producers of the like product on the domestic market were found representative.
Na podlagi tega je bilo za sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika ugotovljeno, da je bil celotni obseg njune prodaje podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu reprezentativen.
The Commission subsequently identified the product types sold domestically that were identical or comparable with the product types sold for export to the Union for the exporting producers with representative domestic sales.
Komisija je za proizvajalce izvoznike z reprezentativno domačo prodajo naknadno ugotovila, katere vrste izdelka, prodane na domačem trgu, so bile enake vrstam izdelka, prodanim za izvoz v Unijo, ali primerljive z njimi.
The Commission then examined whether the domestic sales by each exporting producer on its domestic market for each product type that is identical or comparable with a product type sold for export to the Union were representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je domača prodaja posameznih proizvajalcev izvoznikov na njihovem domačem trgu reprezentativna za posamezne vrste izdelka, ki so enake vrstam, prodanim za izvoz v Unijo, ali primerljive z njimi.
The domestic sales of a product type are representative if the total volume of domestic sales of that product type to independent customers during the investigation period represents at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the identical or comparable product type to the Union.
Domača prodaja vrste izdelka je reprezentativna, če celotni obseg domače prodaje te vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam v obdobju preiskave predstavlja vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza enake ali podobne vrste izdelka v Uniji.
The Commission established that the sales of the two cooperating exporting producers were representative.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je prodaja obeh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov reprezentativna.
The Commission then defined the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market for each product type during the RIP in order to decide whether to use actual domestic sales price for the calculation of the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe za vsako vrsto izdelka določila delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v OPP, da bi sprejela odločitev, ali bo za izračun normalne vrednosti uporabila dejansko domačo prodajno ceno.
the domestic sales volume of the product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of this product type; and
če je obseg domače prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, enaki izračunanim stroškom proizvodnje ali višji od njih, zajemal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka in
In respect of the two cooperating Indian companies in this investigation, it was established that neither of them had sales fulfilling the criteria above.
V zvezi z indijskima družbama, ki sta sodelovali v tej preiskavi, je bilo ugotovljeno, da nobena od njiju ni imela prodaje, ki bi izpolnjevala navedena merila.
the volume of profitable sales of the product type represents 80 % or less of the total sales volume of this type: or
če obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka predstavlja 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka ali
In respect of one cooperating Indian company, Radiant, which only sold one product type domestically and for exports, the normal value was determined based on this methodology and only the profitable sales, amounting to [10-15] % of the sales, were used.
Za eno sodelujočo indijsko družbo, tj. družbo Radiant, ki je na domačem trgu in za izvoz prodajala le eno vrsto izdelka, je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi te metodologije, uporabila pa se je le dobičkonosna prodaja, ki je znašala [10–15] % prodaje.
For the other cooperating Indian company these criteria did not apply.
Za drugo sodelujočo indijsko družbo se ta merila niso uporabila.
Where there were no or insufficient sales of a product type of the like product in the ordinary course of trade, the Commission constructed the normal value in accordance with paragraphs (3) and (6) of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Če prodaje vrste podobnega izdelka v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine ni bilo ali ni bila zadostna, je Komisija normalno vrednost konstruirala v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
For such product types normal value was constructed by adding to the average cost of production of the like product of the cooperating exporting producer during the RIP:
Za take vrste izdelka je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da se je povprečnim stroškom proizvodnje podobnega izdelka sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v OPP prištelo naslednje:
the weighted average selling, general and administrative (‘SG&A’) expenses incurred by the sole cooperating exporting producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the RIP; and
tehtano povprečje prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov („PSA-stroški“) edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki so v OPP nastali pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine, ter
the weighted average profit realised by the sole cooperating exporting producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the RIP.
tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki ga je v OPP dosegel edini sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine.