natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 13(2)(b) of the basic Regulation, in order to establish circumvention, the Commission had to verify that the parts used in the assembly operation from the countries subject to the measures constituted 60 % or more of the total value of the parts of the assembled product and that the value added to the parts brought in was not greater than 25 % of the manufacturing cost.
V skladu s členom 13(2)(b) osnovne uredbe pri ugotavljanju obstoja izogibanja, je morala Komisija preveriti, ali so deli, ki se uporabljajo v dejavnosti sestavljanja iz držav, za katere veljajo ukrepi, predstavljali 60 % ali več celotne vrednosti delov sestavljenega izdelka, in ali dodana vrednost, ki je bila dodana vnesenim delom, ni bila večja od 25 % proizvodnih stroškov.
First criterion: 60 % of the total value of the parts constituting the assembled product
prvo merilo: 60 % celotne vrednosti delov, ki predstavljajo sestavljeni izdelek
For both cooperating companies it was found that the parts from the country subject to measures did not constitute 60 % or more of the total value of the parts of the assembled products.
Za obe sodelujoči družbi je bilo ugotovljeno, da deli iz države, ki je predmet teh ukrepov, niso predstavljali 60 % ali več skupne vrednosti delov sestavljenih proizvodov.
Consequently, the assembly operations carried out by the cooperating Vietnamese companies cannot be considered as circumvention within the meaning of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se dejavnosti sestavljanja, ki jih izvajata sodelujoči vietnamski družbi, ne morejo šteti za izogibanje v smislu člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
Second criterion: 25 % of the value added to the parts brought in
druga merila: 25 % dodane vrednosti, ki je bila dodana vnesenim delom
As the investigation showed that the 60 % criterion was not met and the assembly operation cannot be considered as circumvention within the meaning of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation, it was not considered necessary to examine this criterion.
Ker je preiskava pokazala, da merilo 60 % ni bilo izpolnjeno, in dejavnost sestavljanja ni mogoče šteti za izogibanje v smislu člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe, tega merila ni bilo treba preučiti.
Conditions of Article 13(2)(c): undermining of the remedial effects of the duty and evidence of dumping
Pogoji iz člena 13(2)(c): slabitev popravljalnih učinkov dajatve in dokazi o dampingu
As the investigation showed that the 60 % criterion was not met and the assembly operation cannot be considered as circumvention within the meaning of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation, it was not considered necessary to examine these aspects.
Ker je preiskava pokazala, da merilo 60 % ni bilo izpolnjeno, in dejavnosti sestavljanja ni mogoče šteti za izogibanje v smislu člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe, teh vidikov ni bilo treba preučiti.
Since the two investigated companies represent 100 % of the Vietnamese imports during the reporting period it could not be established that measures in force with regard to China are being circumvented by imports consigned from Vietnam.
Ker obe preiskovani družbi predstavljata 100 % uvoza iz Vietnama v obdobju poročanja, ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali je prišlo do izogibanja ukrepov v zvezi s Kitajsko z uvozom, poslanim iz Vietnama.
In view of the findings mentioned in recitals 30 to 32, the current anti-circumvention investigation should be terminated.
Ob upoštevanju ugotovitev iz uvodnih izjav od (30) do (32) bi bilo treba sedanjo preiskavo o izogibanju zaključiti.
The registration of imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts consigned from Vietnam, whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not, introduced by the Initiating Regulation should therefore be discontinued, and that Regulation should be repealed.
Registracijo uvoza ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, poslanih iz Vietnama, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Vietnama ali ne, ki jo je uvedla začetna uredba, bi bilo zato treba ukiniti, navedeno uredbo pa bi bilo treba razveljaviti.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission intended to terminate the investigation and were given the opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je Komisija nameravala zaključiti preiskavo, imeli pa so tudi možnost, da dajo svoje pripombe.
The comments received were not of a nature to change the above conclusions.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb, zaradi katerih bi se spremenili zgornji sklepi.
The measures provided for in this regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 –
The investigation initiated by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1348 in order to determine if imports into the Union of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts, i.e. chassis and hydraulics, originating in the People's Republic of China, currently falling within CN codes ex84279000 and ex84312000 and consigned from Vietnam, whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not (TARIC codes 8427900013 and 8431200013) are circumventing the measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013, is hereby terminated.
Preiskava, uvedena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2017/1348, da se ugotovi, ali se uvoz v Unijo ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, tj. šasije in hidravlike, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex84279000 in ex84312000 in so poslani iz Vietnama, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom iz Vietnama ali ne (oznaki TARIC 8427900013 in 8431200013), izogiba ukrepom, uvedenim z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1008/2011, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 372/2013, se zaključi.
Customs authorities shall discontinue the registration of imports established in accordance with Article 2 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1348.
Carinski organi prenehajo z registracijo uvoza, določeno v skladu s členom 2 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1348.
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1348 is hereby repealed.
Izvedbena uredba (EU) 2017/1348 se razveljavi.
Done at Brussels, 21 February 2018.
V Bruslju, 21. februarja 2018
Council Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 of 18 July 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 189, 21.7.2005, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1174/2005 z dne 18. julija 2005 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene za uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 189, 21.7.2005, str. 1).
Council Regulation (EC) No 684/2008 of 17 July 2008 clarifying the scope of the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 192, 19.7.2008, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 684/2008 z dne 17. julija 2008 o določitvi obsega uporabe protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 1174/2005 o uvozu ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 192, 19.7.2008, str. 1).
Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 of 11 June 2009 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not (OJ L 151, 16.6.2009, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 499/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1174/2005 na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega s Tajske, s prijavljenim poreklom iz Tajske ali ne (UL L 151, 16.6.2009, str. 1).
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 of 10 October 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China as extended to imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 268, 13.10.2011, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1008/2011 z dne 10. oktobra 2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila razširjena na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, poslanih iz Tajske, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Tajske ali ne, po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL L 268, 13.10.2011, str. 1).
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 of 22 April 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 112, 24.4.2013, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 372/2013 z dne 22. aprila 2013 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1008/2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, po delnem vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL L 112, 24.4.2013, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 946/2014 of 4 September 2014 amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 imposing a definitive anti- dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China following a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 ( OJ L 265, 5.9.2014, p. 7).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 946/2014 z dne 4. septembra 2014 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1008/2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu glede „novega izvoznika“ v skladu s členom 11(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 ( UL L 265, 5.9.2014, str. 7).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1346 of 8 August 2016 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, as amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013, on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of slightly modified hand pallet trucks originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 214, 9.8.2016, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1346 z dne 8. avgusta 2016 o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1008/2011, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 372/2013 o uvozu ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz nekoliko spremenjenih ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 214, 9.8.2016, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2206 of 29 November 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 314, 30.11.2017, p. 12).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/2206 z dne 29. novembra 2017 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 314, 30.11.2017, str. 12).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1348 of 19 July 2017 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013, on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China by imports consigned from Vietnam, whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not, and making such imports subject to registration (OJ L 188, 20.7.2017, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1348 z dne 19. julija 2017 o začetku preiskave glede možnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1008/2011, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 372/2013 o uvozu ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, z uvozom, poslanim iz Vietnama, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom iz Vietnama ali ne, in o registraciji takšnega uvoza (UL L 188, 20.7.2017, str. 1).
Comext is a database on foreign trade statistics managed by Eurostat.
Comex je podatkovna zbirka statističnih podatkov o zunanji trgovini, ki jih vodi Eurostat.
Council Regulation (EU) 2018/264
Uredba Sveta (EU) 2018/264
fixing the production levies and the coefficient for calculating the additional levy in the sugar sector for the 1999/2000 marketing year and fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for the 2000/2001 marketing year
o določitvi proizvodnih dajatev in koeficienta za izračun dodatnih dajatev v sektorju sladkorja za tržno leto 1999/2000 ter o določitvi proizvodnih dajatev v sektorju sladkorja za tržno leto 2000/2001
Articles 33(8) and 34(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 empowered the Commission to adopt detailed rules on the basic production levies and the coefficient for the calculation of the additional levy, to be collected from quota holders operating in the framework of the common organisation of markets in the sugar sector.
Komisija je bila v skladu s členoma 33(8) in 34(5) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2038/1999 pooblaščena za sprejetje podrobnih pravil glede osnovnih proizvodnih dajatev in koeficienta za izračun dodatne dajatve, ki jih je treba zaračunati imetnikom kvot, ki delujejo v okviru skupne ureditve trgov v sektorju sladkorja.
Commission Regulations (EC) No 2267/2000 and (EC) No 1993/2001 established the production levies and the coefficient for calculating the additional levy in the sugar sector.
Z uredbama Komisije (ES) št. 2267/2000 in (ES) št. 1993/2001 so bile določene proizvodne dajatve in koeficient za izračun dodatne dajatve v sektorju sladkorja.
In the framework of the reform of the common market organisation for the sugar sector, Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 repealed and replaced Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999.
V okviru reforme skupne ureditve trga za sektor sladkorja je bila Uredba (ES) št. 2038/1999 razveljavljena in nadomeščena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1260/2001.
Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 repealed and replaced Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1260/2001 je bila razveljavljena in nadomeščena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 318/2006.
Regulation (EC) No 318/2006, which was subsequently repealed and incorporated into Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, replaced the variable sugar production levy system of self-financing the production quota regime by a new production charge aimed at contributing to the financing of the expenditure occurring in the sugar sector under the common market organisation for sugar.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 318/2006, ki je bila pozneje razveljavljena in vključena v Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007, je bil sistem variabilnih proizvodnih dajatev za sladkor s samofinanciranjem ureditve proizvodnih kvot nadomeščen z novo proizvodno dajatvijo, katere namen je prispevati k financiranju odhodkov, ki nastanejo v sektorju sladkorja v okviru skupne ureditve trga za sladkor.
Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, which repealed and replaced Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, this temporary production charge remained applicable until 30 September 2017.
Na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ki je razveljavila in nadomestila Uredbo (ES) št. 1234/2007, je ta začasna proizvodna dajatev ostala veljavna do 30. septembra 2017.
In its Judgment of 9 February 2017 in Case C-585/15, Raffinerie Tirlemontoise, the Court of Justice declared invalid Regulations (EC) No 2267/2000 and (EC) No 1993/2001.
Sodišče je s sodbo z dne 9. februarja 2017 v zadevi C-585/15, Raffinerie Tirlemontoise razglasilo, da sta uredbi (ES) št. 2267/2000 in (ES) št. 1993/2001 neveljavni.
In that judgment, the Court held that Article 33(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purpose of calculating the average loss, it is necessary to divide the total amount of the actual expenditure for export refunds for products which come under that provision by the total amount of the quantities of those products which were exported, regardless of whether or not refunds have in fact been paid in respect of the latter.
Sodišče je v navedeni sodbi odločilo, da je člen 33(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 2038/1999 treba razlagati tako, da je treba pri izračunu povprečne izgube skupni znesek dejanskih stroškov, povezanih z izvoznimi nadomestili za proizvode iz navedene določbe, deliti s skupno izvoženo količino teh proizvodov, ne glede na to, ali so bila za te proizvode dejansko izplačana nadomestila.
Furthermore, the Court also stated that Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purpose of the overall calculation of the production levies, it is necessary to take into account the average loss calculated by dividing the total amount of the actual expenditure for export refunds for products which come under that provision by the total amount of the quantities exported, regardless of whether or not refunds have in fact been paid in respect of the latter.
Sodišče je poleg tega navedlo, da je člen 33(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2038/1999 treba razlagati tako, da je treba pri skupnem izračunu proizvodnih dajatev upoštevati povprečno izgubo, ki se izračuna tako, da se skupni znesek dejanskih stroškov, povezanih z izvoznimi nadomestili za proizvode iz navedene določbe, deli s skupno izvoženo količino teh proizvodov, ne glede na to, ali so bila za te proizvode dejansko izplačana nadomestila.
In order to comply with the Court's judgement, the production levies and the additional levies should therefore be fixed at the appropriate level.
Za izvršitev sodbe Sodišča je treba določiti proizvodne dajatve in dodatne dajatve na ustrezni ravni.
In particular, the ‘average loss’ is to be calculated by dividing the actual total refunds paid by the total exported quantities for products which were eligible to refunds, regardless whether they were exported with or without a refund.
Natančneje je „povprečno izgubo“ treba izračunati tako, da se dejanska plačana skupna nadomestila delijo s skupno izvoženo količino za proizvode, ki so upravičeni do nadomestil, ne glede na to, ali je bil izvoz opravljen z nadomestilom ali brez njega.
The application of the method indicated by the Court leads to a substantial decrease in the ‘average loss’ and the ‘overall loss’ to be covered by the levies for the 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 marketing years.
Uporaba metode, ki jo je določilo Sodišče, vodi v pomembno zmanjšanje „povprečne izgube“ in „skupne izgube“, ki ju je treba pokriti z dajatvami za tržni leti 1999/2000 in 2000/2001.
The revision of the production levies for the 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 marketing years will affect the amount payable by the sugar producers to the beet growers in respect of the difference between the maximum amount of the A or B levy and the amount of these levies charged for the marketing years concerned.
Sprememba proizvodnih dajatev za tržni leti 1999/2000 in 2000/2001 bo vplivala na znesek, ki so ga proizvajalci sladkorja morali plačati pridelovalcem sladkorne pese zaradi razlike med najvišjim zneskom dajatve A ali B in zneskom teh dajatev, zaračunanim za zadevni tržni leti.
According to the rules establishing a common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector in force until 2006, the levies were paid by sugar manufacturers but the latter recovered 60 % of these costs from beet growers, by paying a lower beet price.
V skladu s pravili o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov v sektorju sladkorja, ki je veljala do leta 2006, so dajatve plačevali proizvajalci sladkorja, vendar so 60 % navedenih stroškov pokrili pridelovalci sladkorne pese, tako da so proizvajalcem plačevali nižje zneske za sladkorno peso.
Article 36(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 provided that when the amounts of the levies were set below the maximum level for the A or B levies (i.e. 2 % or 37,5 % of the intervention price for white sugar, respectively), sugar manufacturers had to pay beet sellers 60 % of the difference between the maximum amount of the levy in question and the amount of the base levy or the B levy actually charged.
V členu 36(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2038/1999 je bilo določeno, da morajo v primeru zneskov dajatev, določenih pod najvišjo vrednostjo za dajatve A ali B (tj. 2 % ali 37,5 % intervencijske cene za beli sladkor), proizvajalci sladkorja prodajalcem sladkorne pese plačati 60 % razlike med najvišjim zneskom zadevne dajatve in zneskom dejansko zaračunane osnovne dajatve ali dajatve B.
The revised amounts that sugar producers should pay back to beet sellers should therefore be established.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti spremenjene zneske, ki bi jih morali proizvajalci sladkorja vrniti prodajalcem sladkorne pese.
Only the difference between the old amounts and the new amounts should be reimbursed to beet sellers.
Prodajalcem sladkorne pese bi bilo treba vrniti le razliko med starimi zneski in novimi zneski.
For the 1999/2000 marketing year, the overall loss not covered by the levies, recalculated in accordance with the method indicated by the Court, amounts to EUR 66941664.
Za tržno leto 1999/2000 skupna izguba, ki ni pokrita iz dajatev, preračunana v skladu z metodo, ki jo je določilo Sodišče, znaša 66941664 EUR.
The coefficient referred to in Article 34(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 should be set accordingly and should be applicable retroactively for that marketing year.
Koeficient iz člena 34(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2038/1999 bi bilo treba ustrezno določiti in ga uporabiti retroaktivno za navedeno tržno leto.
For the 2000/2001 marketing year, the overall loss not covered by the levies, recalculated in accordance with the method indicated by the Court, amounts to EUR 49376802.
Za tržno leto 2000/2001 skupna izguba, ki ni pokrita iz dajatev, preračunana v skladu z metodo, ki jo je določilo Sodišče, znaša 49376802 EUR.
For reasons of legal certainty, and to ensure uniform treatment of the economic operators concerned in different Member States, it is necessary to set a date by which the levies fixed by this Regulation should be established, as referred to in the second and third subparagraph of Article 2(2) of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in za zagotovitev enake obravnave zadevnih gospodarskih subjektov v različnih državah članicah je treba določiti datum, do katerega bi bilo treba vzpostaviti dajatve, določene v tej uredbi, kot je določen v drugem in tretjem pododstavku člena 2(2) Uredbe Sveta (EU, Euratom) št. 609/2014.
However, this deadline should not apply where Member States are required under national law to reimburse the operators concerned after that date.
Vendar pa se ta rok ne bi smel uporabljati, kadar nacionalno pravo države članice zavezuje, da morajo zadevnim subjektom povračilo zagotoviti po tem datumu.