natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The minimum number of tests is four and the maximum number of tests is four times the number of engine families considered within the emission OBD family.
Najmanjše število preskusov je štiri, največje število preskusov pa je štirikrat toliko, kolikor se upošteva družin motorjev v družini sistemov OBD glede na emisije.
The administrative department may decide to curtail the test at any time before this maximum number of failure tests has been reached.
Upravna služba se lahko kadar koli odloči skrajšati preskus, preden je doseženo to največje število preskusov okvar.
In specific cases where the classification testing is not possible (for example, if an MECS is activated and the engine cannot run the applicable test, etc.), the malfunction may be classified based on technical justification.
V posebnih primerih, kjer preskušanje za razvrstitev ni mogoče (na primer, če se aktivira MECS in motor ne more izvesti ustreznega preskusa itn.), se lahko napaka razvrsti na podlagi tehnične utemeljitve.
This exception shall be documented by the manufacturer and is subject to the agreement of the administrative department.
To izjemo dokumentira proizvajalec in je predmet soglasja upravne službe.
Demonstration of classification into A
Dokazovanje razvrstitve v kategorijo A
The classification by the manufacturer of a malfunction into Class A shall not be subject to a demonstration test.
Proizvajalčeva uvrstitev napake v kategorijo A ni predmet demonstracijskega preskusa.
If the administrative department disagrees with a manufacturer's classification of a malfunction as Class A, the administrative department requires the classification of the malfunction into Class B1, B2 or C, as appropriate.
Če se upravna služba ne strinja s proizvajalčevo uvrstitvijo napake v kategorijo A, zahteva uvrstitev napake bodisi v kategorijo B1, B2 ali C.
In that case the approval document shall record that the malfunction classification has been assigned according to the request of the administrative department.
V tem primeru mora biti v dokumentu o homologaciji zapisano, da je bila razvrstitev napake določena v skladu z zahtevo upravne službe.
Demonstration of classification into B1 (distinguishing between A and B1)
Dokazovanje razvrstitve v kategorijo B1 (razlikovanje med A in B1)
In order to justify the classification of a malfunction into Class B1 the documentation shall clearly demonstrate that, in some circumstances, the malfunction results in emissions that are lower than the OTLs.
Za namen utemeljitve uvrstitve napake v kategorijo B1, mora biti iz dokumentacije jasno razvidno, da v določenih okoliščinah napaka povzroči emisije, nižje od mejnih vrednosti OBD.
In the case that the administrative department requires an emission test for demonstrating the classification of a malfunction into Class B1 the manufacturer shall demonstrate that the emissions due to that particular malfunction are, in selected circumstances, below the OTLs:
Če upravna služba zahteva, da se za dokaz uvrstitve napake v kategorijo B1 izvede preskus glede emisij, mora proizvajalec dokazati, da so emisije zaradi te konkretne napake v izbranih okoliščinah nižje od mejnih vrednosti OBD:
the manufacturer selects the circumstances of the test in agreement with the administrative department;
proizvajalec izbere okoliščine preskusa v dogovoru z upravno službo;
the manufacturer shall not be required to demonstrate that in other circumstances the emissions due to the malfunction are actually above the OTLs.
proizvajalcu ni treba dokazati, da so v drugih okoliščinah emisije zaradi te napake dejansko višje od mejnih vrednosti OBD.
If the manufacturer fails to demonstrate the classification as Class B1, the malfunction is classified as Class A.
Če proizvajalcu ne uspe dokazati razvrstitve v kategorijo B1, se napaka uvrsti v kategorijo A.
Demonstration of classification into B1 (distinguishing between B2 and B1)
Dokazovanje razvrstitve v kategorijo B1 (razlikovanje med B2 in B1)
If the administrative department disagrees with a manufacturer's classification of a malfunction as Class B1 because it considers that the OTLs are not exceeded, the administrative department requires the reclassification of that malfunction into Class B2 or C. In that case the approval documents shall record that the malfunction classification has been assigned according to the request of the administrative department.
Če se upravna služba ne strinja s proizvajalčevo uvrstitvijo napake v kategorijo B1, ker meni, da mejne vrednosti OBD niso presežene, potem zahteva prerazvrstitev te napake v kategorijo B2 ali C. V tem primeru mora biti v dokumentih o homologaciji zapisano, da je bila razvrstitev napake določena v skladu z zahtevo upravne službe.
Demonstration of classification into B2 (distinguishing between B2 and B1)
Dokazovanje razvrstitve v kategorijo B2 (razlikovanje med B2 in B1)
In order to justify the classification of a malfunction into Class B2 the manufacturer shall demonstrate that emissions are lower than the OTLs.
Za namen utemeljitve uvrstitve napake v kategorijo B2 mora proizvajalec dokazati, da so emisije nižje od mejnih vrednosti OBD.
In case the administrative department disagrees with the classification of a malfunction as Class B2 because it considers that the OTLs are exceeded, the manufacturer may be required to demonstrate by testing that the emissions due to the malfunction are below the OTLs.
Če se upravna služba ne strinja z uvrstitvijo napake v kategorijo B2, ker meni, da so mejne vrednosti OBD presežene, lahko od proizvajalca zahteva, da s preskušanjem dokaže, da so emisije zaradi te napake nižje od mejnih vrednosti OBD.
If the test fails, then the administrative department shall require the reclassification of that malfunction into A or B1 and the manufacturer shall subsequently demonstrate the appropriate classification and the documentation shall be updated.
Če preskus ni uspešen, potem upravna služba zahteva prerazvrstitev te napake v kategorijo A ali B1, proizvajalec pa mora nato dokazati ustreznost te razvrstitve, medtem ko mora biti dokumentacija posodobljena.
Demonstration of classification into B2 (distinguishing between B2 and C)
Dokazovanje razvrstitve v kategorijo B2 (razlikovanje med B2 in C)
If the administrative department disagrees with a manufacturer's classification of a malfunction as Class B2 because it considers the regulated emission limits are not exceeded, the administrative department requires the reclassification of that malfunction into Class C. In that case the approval documents shall record that the malfunction classification has been assigned according to the request of the administrative department.
Če se upravna služba ne strinja s proizvajalčevo uvrstitvijo napake v kategorijo B2, ker meni, da s predpisi urejene mejne vrednosti emisij niso presežene, potem zahteva prerazvrstitev te napake v kategorijo C. V tem primeru mora biti v dokumentih o homologaciji zapisano, da je bila razvrstitev napake določena v skladu z zahtevo upravne službe.
Demonstration of classification into C
Dokazovanje razvrstitve v kategorijo C
In order to justify the classification of a malfunction into Class C the manufacturer shall demonstrate that emissions are lower than the regulated emission limits.
Za namen utemeljitve uvrstitve napake v kategorijo C mora proizvajalec dokazati, da so emisije nižje od s predpisi urejenih mejnih vrednosti emisij.
In case the administrative department disagrees with the classification of a malfunction as Class C the manufacturer may be required to demonstrate by testing that the emissions due to the malfunction are below the regulated emission limits.
Če se upravna služba ne strinja z uvrstitvijo napake v kategorijo C, lahko od proizvajalca zahteva, da s preskušanjem dokaže, da so emisije zaradi te napake nižje od mejnih vrednosti emisij, urejenih s predpisi.
If the test fails, then the administrative department shall request the reclassification of that malfunction and the manufacturer shall subsequently demonstrate the appropriate reclassification and the documentation shall be updated.
Če preskus ni uspešen, potem upravna služba zahteva prerazvrstitev te napake, proizvajalec pa mora nato dokazati ustreznost te prerazvrstitve, medtem ko mora biti dokumentacija posodobljena.
Procedures for demonstrating the OBD performance
Postopki dokazovanja delovanja OBD
The manufacturer shall submit to the administrative department a complete documentation package justifying the compliance of the OBD system as regards its monitoring capability, which may include:
Proizvajalec mora upravni službi predložiti celotni sveženj dokumentacije, ki dokazuje skladnost sistema OBD, kar zadeva zmogljivost nadzora, in lahko vključuje:
algorithms and decision charts
algoritme in odločitvene diagrame,
tests and/or simulation results
rezultate preskusov in/ali simulacij,
reference to previously approved monitoring systems, etc.
sklic na predhodno odobrene sisteme nadzora itn.
In the following paragraphs the requirements for demonstrating the OBD performance are listed, including requirements for testing.
V naslednjih odstavkih so navedene zahteve za dokazovanje delovanja OBD, vključno z zahtevami za preskušanje.
Procedures for demonstrating the OBD performance by testing
Postopki dokazovanja delovanja OBD s preskušanjem
In addition to the supporting data referred to in paragraph 6.3., the manufacturer shall demonstrate the proper monitoring of specific emission control systems or components by testing them on an engine test-bed according to the test procedures specified in paragraph 7.2. of this annex.
Poleg tega, da proizvajalec predloži podporne podatke iz odstavka 6.3, mora dokazati ustrezno spremljanje specifičnih sistemov ali sestavnih delov za uravnavanje emisij, tako da jih preskusi na napravi za preskus motorja v skladu s preskusnimi postopki, določenimi v odstavku 7.2 te priloge.
In that case, the manufacturer shall make available the qualified deteriorated components or the electrical device which would be used to simulate a malfunction.
V tem primeru mora proizvajalec zagotoviti kvalificirane okvarjene sestavne dele ali električno napravo, ki bi se uporabljala za simuliranje napake.
The proper detection of the malfunction by the OBD system and its proper response to that detection (cf. MI indication, DTC storage, etc.) shall be demonstrated according to paragraph 7.2.
Ustrezna zaznava napake s strani sistema OBD in primeren odziv le-tega na to zaznavo (glej prikaz MI, shranjevanje DTC itd.) se dokazuje v skladu z odstavkom 7.2.
Procedures for qualifying a deteriorated component (or system)
Postopek kvalificiranja okvarjenega sestavnega dela (ali sistema)
This paragraph applies to the cases where the malfunction selected for an OBD demonstration test is monitored against tailpipe emissions (emission threshold monitoring — see paragraph 4.2.), by an emission test, for the qualification of that deteriorated component.
Ta odstavek se uporablja za primere, ko se napaka, izbrana za demonstracijski preskus OBD, nadzira v primerjavi z emisijami iz izpušne cevi (nadzor mejnih vrednosti emisij – glej odstavek 4.2) s preskusom glede emisij za kvalificiranje tega okvarjenega sestavnega dela.
In very specific cases the qualification of deteriorated components or systems by testing may not be possible (for example, if an MECS is activated and the engine cannot run the applicable test, etc.).
V zelo specifičnih primerih morda kvalificiranje okvarjenih sestavnih delov ali sistemov s preskušanjem ni mogoče (na primer, če se aktivira MECS in motor ne more izvesti ustreznega preskusa itn.).
In such cases, the deteriorated component shall be qualified without testing.
V takih primerih se okvarjen sestavni del kvalificira brez preskušanja.
Procedure for qualifying a deteriorated component used to demonstrate the detection of classes A and B1 malfunctions
Postopek kvalificiranja okvarjenega sestavnega dela, ki se uporablja za dokazovanje zaznave napak kategorij A in B1
In the case the malfunction selected by the administrative department results in tailpipe emissions that may exceed an OBD threshold limit, the manufacturer shall demonstrate by an emission test according to paragraph 7. that the deteriorated component or device does not result in the relevant emission exceeding its OTL by more than 20 per cent.
Če napaka, ki jo izbere upravna služba, povzroči emisije iz izpušne cevi, ki lahko presežejo mejno vrednost OBD, mora proizvajalec s preskusom glede emisij v skladu z odstavkom 7 dokazati, da okvarjen sestavni del ali naprava ne povzroči, da ustrezne emisije presežejo svojo OTL za več kot 20 %.
Qualification of deteriorated components used to demonstrate the detection of Class B2 malfunctions
Kvalificiranje okvarjenih sestavnih delov, ki se uporablja za dokazovanje zaznave napak kategorije B2
In the case of Class B2 malfunctions, and upon request of the administrative department, the manufacturer shall demonstrate by an emission test according to paragraph 7. that the deteriorated component or device does not lead the relevant emission to exceed its applicable OTL.
V primeru napak kategorije B2 in na zahtevo upravne službe proizvajalec s preskusom glede emisij v skladu z odstavkom 7 dokaže, da okvarjen sestavni del ali naprava ne povzroči, da ustrezne emisije presežejo svojo ustrezno OTL.
Qualification of deteriorated components used to demonstrate the detection of Class C malfunctions
Kvalificiranje okvarjenih sestavnih delov, ki se uporablja za dokazovanje zaznave napak kategorije C
In the case of Class C malfunctions, and upon request of the administrative department, the manufacturer shall demonstrate by an emission test according to paragraph 7. that the deteriorated component or device does not lead the relevant emission to exceed its applicable regulated emission limit.
V primeru napak kategorije C in na zahtevo upravne službe proizvajalec s preskusom glede emisij v skladu z odstavkom 7 dokaže, da okvarjen sestavni del ali naprava ne povzroči, da ustrezne emisije presežejo svojo ustrezno mejno vrednost emisije, urejeno s predpisi.
The test report shall contain, at a minimum, the information set out in appendix 4.
Poročilo o preskusu mora vsebovati vsaj podatke, določene v dodatku 4.
Approval authorities may approve upon request of a manufacturer an OBD system even though the system contains one or more deficiencies.
Homologacijski organi lahko na zahtevo proizvajalca homologirajo sistem OBD, tudi če vsebuje eno ali več pomanjkljivosti.
In considering the request, the administrative department shall determine whether compliance with the requirements of this annex is feasible or unreasonable.
Pri obravnavi tega zahtevka upravna služba ugotovi, ali je skladnost z zahtevami te priloge možna ali neutemeljena.
The administrative department shall take into consideration data from the manufacturer that details such factors as, but not limited to, technical feasibility, lead time and production cycles including phase-in or phase-out of engines designs and programmed upgrades of computers, the extend to which the resultant OBD system will be effective in complying with the requirements of this annex and that the manufacturer has demonstrated an acceptable level of effort toward meeting the requirements of the annex.
Upravna služba mora upoštevati podatke proizvajalca, ki med drugim vključujejo tudi dejavnike, kot so tehnična izvedljivost, časovna priprava in proizvodni cikli, vključno s postopnim uvajanjem ali postopno opustitvijo konstrukcij motorjev in programiranimi nadgradnjami računalnikov, stopnja učinkovitosti sistema OBD glede izpolnjevanja zahtev te priloge ter dokazana zadovoljiva raven prizadevanja proizvajalca za izpolnjevanje zahtev te priloge.
The administrative department will not accept any deficiency request that includes the complete lack of a required diagnostic monitor (i.e. a complete lack of the monitors required in appendix 3).
Upravna služba ne bo ugodila zahtevi za podelitev homologacije za sistem s pomanjkljivostmi, če ta nima obvezne funkcije nadzora (tj. nima monitorjev, ki se zahtevajo v dodatku 3).
A deficiency is granted for a period of one year after the date of approval of the engine system.
Pomanjkljivost je dopustna še eno leto od datuma podelitve homologacije za sistem motorja.
If the manufacturer can adequately demonstrate to the administrative department that substantial engine modifications and additional lead time would be necessary to correct the deficiency, then this deficiency can be granted again for an additional one year, provided that the total deficiency period does not exceed 3 years (i.e. 3 times one year deficiency allowance is permitted).
Če lahko proizvajalec upravni službi zadovoljivo dokaže, da so za odpravo pomanjkljivosti potrebne večje spremembe motorja in dodatna časovna priprava, potem se lahko pomanjkljivost dopusti še za nadaljnje leto, pod pogojem, da celotno obdobje pomanjkljivosti ne preseže 3 let (tj. dovoljeno je trikrat po enoletno obdobje pomanjkljivosti).
The manufacturer cannot apply for a renewal of the deficiency period.
Proizvajalec ne more zaprositi za podaljšanje obdobja pomanjkljivosti.
Testing process
Postopek preskušanja
The demonstration by testing of the proper malfunction classification and the demonstration by testing of the proper monitoring performance of an OBD system are issues that shall be considered separately during the testing process.
Dokazovanje ustrezne razvrstitve napake s preskušanjem ter dokazovanje pravilnega izvajanja nadzora sistema OBD s preskušanjem sta dve zadevi, ki ju je treba v postopku preskušanja obravnavati ločeno.
For example, a Class A malfunction will not require a classification test while it may be subject to an OBD performance test.
Na primer, za napako kategorije A ne bo potreben preskus za razvrstitev, medtem ko je morda predmet preskusa delovanja OBD.
Where appropriate, the same test may be used to demonstrate the correct classification of a malfunction, the qualification of a deteriorated component provided by the manufacturer and the correct monitoring by the OBD system.
Kjer je to primerno, se lahko isti preskus uporabi za dokazovanje pravilne razvrstitve napake, kvalificiranje okvarjenega sestavnega dela, ki ga predloži proizvajalec, in dokazovanje pravilnega nadzora sistema OBD.
The engine system on which the OBD system is tested shall comply with the emission requirements of this Regulation.
Sistem motorja, na katerem se preskuša sistem OBD, mora izpolnjevati zahteve tega pravilnika glede emisij.
Testing process for demonstrating the malfunction classification
Postopek preskušanja za dokazovanje razvrstitve napake
When, according to paragraph 6.2., the administrative department requests the manufacturer to justify by testing the classification of a specific malfunction, the compliance demonstration will consist of a series of emission tests.
Kadar upravna služba v skladu z odstavkom 6.2 od proizvajalca zahteva, da s preskušanjem utemelji razvrstitev konkretne napake, dokazovanje skladnosti sestavlja serija preskusov glede emisij.
According to paragraph 6.2.2., when testing is required by the administrative department to justify the classification of a malfunction into Class B1 rather than in Class A, the manufacturer shall demonstrate that the emissions due to that particular malfunction are, in selected circumstances, below the OTLs:
Kadar upravna služba zahteva preskušanje za utemeljitev uvrstitve napake v kategorijo B1 namesto v kategorijo A, mora proizvajalec v skladu z odstavkom 6.2.2 dokazati, da so emisije zaradi te konkretne napake v izbranih okoliščinah nižje od mejnih vrednosti OBD:
the manufacturer selects these circumstances of test in agreement with the administrative department
proizvajalec izbere te okoliščine preskusa v dogovoru z upravno službo,
The emission test may be repeated upon request of the manufacturer up to three times.
Preskus glede emisij se lahko na zahtevo proizvajalca ponovi največ trikrat.
If any of these tests leads to emissions below the considered OTL, then the malfunction classification into Class B1 shall be approved.
Če kateri koli od teh preskusov povzroči, da so emisije nižje od zadevne OTL, potem se odobri uvrstitev napake v kategorijo B1.
When testing is required by the administrative department to justify the classification of a malfunction into Class B2 rather than in Class B1 or into Class C rather than in Class B2, the emission test shall not be repeated.
Kadar upravna služba zahteva preskušanje za utemeljitev uvrstitve napake v kategorijo B2 namesto v kategorijo B1 ali v kategorijo C namesto v kategorijo B2, se preskus glede emisij ne ponovi.
If the emissions measured in the test are above the OTL or the emission limit, respectively, then the malfunction shall require a reclassification.
Če so emisije, izmerjene v preskusu, višje od OTL ali mejne vrednosti emisij, potem je napako treba prerazvrstiti.
According to paragraph 6.2.1., this paragraph does not apply to malfunctions classified into Class A.
Glede na odstavek 6.2.1 se ta odstavek ne uporablja za napake, uvrščene v kategorijo A.
Testing process for demonstrating the OBD performance
Postopek preskušanja za dokazovanje delovanja OBD
When the administrative department requests according to paragraph 6.3. to test the OBD system performance, the compliance demonstration shall consist of the following phases:
Kadar upravna služba v skladu z odstavkom 6.3 zahteva preskus delovanja sistema OBD, dokazovanje skladnosti sestavljajo naslednje faze:
a malfunction is selected by the administrative department and a corresponding deteriorated component or system shall be made available by the manufacturer;
upravna služba izbere napako, proizvajalec pa mora zagotoviti ustrezen okvarjen sestavni del ali sistem;
when appropriate and if requested, the manufacturer shall demonstrate by an emission test that the deteriorated component is qualified for a monitoring demonstration;
kadar je primerno in če se zahteva, proizvajalec s preskusom glede emisij dokaže, da je okvarjen sestavni del ustrezen za nadzorno dokazovanje;
the manufacturer shall demonstrate that the OBD system responds in a manner that complies with the provisions of this annex (i.e. MI indication, DTC storage, etc.) at the latest by the end of a series of OBD test-cycles.
proizvajalec mora dokazati, da se sistem OBD odziva na način, ki je skladen z določbami te priloge (tj. prikaz MI, shranjevanje DTC itn.), najpozneje ob koncu serije preskusnih ciklov OBD.
Qualification of the deteriorated component
Kvalificiranje okvarjenega sestavnega dela
When the administrative department requests the manufacturer to qualify a deteriorated component by testing according to paragraph 6.3.2., this demonstration shall be made by performing an emissions test.
Kadar upravna služba od proizvajalca zahteva, da kvalificira okvarjen sestavni del s preskušanjem v skladu z odstavkom 6.3.2, se to dokazovanje opravi z izvedbo preskušanja za določanje emisij.
If it is determined that the installation of a deteriorated component or device on an engine system means that a comparison with the OBD threshold limits is not possible (e.g. because the statistical conditions for validating the applicable emission test cycle are not met), the malfunction of that component or device may be considered as qualified upon the agreement of the administrative department based on technical rationale provided by the manufacturer.
Če se ugotovi, da namestitev okvarjenega sestavnega dela ali naprave na sistem motorja pomeni, da primerjava z mejnimi vrednostmi OBD ni mogoča (npr. zato, ker niso izpolnjeni statistični pogoji za validacijo ustreznega cikla preskušanja za določanje emisij), je napako tega sestavnega dela ali naprave ob soglasju upravne službe mogoče šteti kot kvalificirano, če proizvajalec poda ustrezne tehnične razloge.