natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the purpose of demonstrating the CO2 savings, component testing should be possible in those cases where the savings are not vehicle-dependent in order to improve the accuracy and simplify the determination of the CO2 savings.
Za namen prikazovanja prihrankov CO2 bi moralo biti mogoče preizkušanje sestavnih delov v tistih primerih, kjer prihranki niso odvisni od vozila, da bi izboljšali točnost in poenostavili določanje prihrankov CO2.
In order to simplify the certification of CO2 savings, it should be possible for the applicant to propose, in addition to a detailed testing methodology for determining the savings, a simplified evaluation method or predefined CO2 savings in the application for the approval of an innovative technology as an eco-innovation.
Da bi poenostavili certificiranje prihrankov CO2, bi moral imeti vlagatelj možnost, da v prošnji za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije poleg natančne metodologije preskušanja za določanje prihrankov predlaga poenostavljeno metodo vrednotenja ali vnaprej določene prihranke CO2.
Where such simplified methods or predefined CO2 savings are used, the savings certified by approval authorities should be determined in a conservative way reflecting the lowest level of savings demonstrated.
Kjer se uporabljajo takšne poenostavljene metode ali vnaprej določeni prihranki CO2, bi bilo treba prihranke, ki so jih certificirali homologacijski organi, določiti na konzervativen način, ki bi odražal najnižjo raven prikazanih prihrankov.
A technology that has already for some time been widely available on the market cannot be considered innovative within the meaning of Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 and should not be eligible as an eco-innovation.
Tehnologija, ki je že nekaj časa splošno dostopna na trgu, se ne more šteti za inovativno v smislu člena 12 Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 in se ne šteje za upravičeno kot ekološka inovacija.
Where the Commission finds, based on the experience gained from assessing a number of innovative technologies with the same characteristics, that it has been satisfactorily and conclusively demonstrated that such technologies meet the eligibility criteria referred to in Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, or in the case an innovative technology is not dependent on manufacturer specific vehicle parameters, it should be possible to approve the innovative technology as an eco-innovation by a decision which provides all manufacturers with the possibility to certify CO2 savings by reference to that decision provided that the conditions of the decision are met.
Če Komisija na osnovi izkušenj, pridobljenih z oceno več inovativnih tehnologij z enakimi značilnostmi, meni, da je bilo zadovoljivo in prepričljivo prikazano, da takšne tehnologije ustrezajo merilom upravičenosti iz člena 12 Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011, ali če inovativna tehnologija ni odvisna od parametrov vozila, specifičnih za posameznega proizvajalca, bi moralo biti mogoče odobriti inovativno tehnologijo kot ekološko inovacijo s sklepom, ki vsem proizvajalcem omogoča, da certificirajo prihranke CO2 s sklicevanjem na ta sklep, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjeni pogoji iz sklepa.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 427/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 427/2014 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 427/2014 is amended as follows:
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 427/2014 se spremeni:
it had been fitted in 3 % or less of all new light commercial vehicles registered in 2009 for applications submitted until 31 December 2019, or in 3 % or less of all new light commercial vehicles registered in the year n – 4, n being the year of application, for applications submitted from 1 January 2020;’;
vgrajena je bila v 3 % ali manj vseh novih lahkih gospodarskih vozil, registriranih leta 2009, za prošnje, vložene do 31. decembra 2019, oz. v 3 % ali manj vseh novih lahkih gospodarskih vozil, registriranih leta n – 4, pri čemer je n leto vložitve prošnje, za prošnje, vložene od 1. januarja 2020;“;
to the Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure referred to in Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 from 14 March 2018.
z globalno usklajenim preskusnim postopkom za lahka vozila iz Uredbe Komisije (EU) 2017/1151 od 14. marca 2018.
point (3) is replaced by the following:
točka 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
“applicant” means the manufacturer or supplier, or a group of manufacturers or suppliers, submitting an application for the approval of an innovative technology as an eco-innovation;’
‚vlagatelj‘ pomeni proizvajalca ali dobavitelja oz. skupino proizvajalcev ali dobaviteljev, ki vloži prošnjo za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije;“;
“requester” means a manufacturer or supplier or a group of manufacturers or suppliers that requests the amendment of a decision approving an innovative technology as an eco-innovation.’
‚vložnik zahtevka‘ pomeni proizvajalca ali dobavitelja oz. skupino proizvajalcev ali dobaviteljev, ki vloži zahtevek za spremembo sklepa o odobritvi inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije.“;
‘An application for the approval of an innovative technology as an eco-innovation shall include the following:’
„Prošnja za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije vsebuje:“;
a methodology to be used for demonstrating the CO2 emission reductions of the innovative technology, including a reference to the applicable standard test procedure in accordance with Article 2(4), or where such methodology has already been approved by the Commission, a reference to the approved methodology;’;
metodologijo, ki se uporabi za prikaz zmanjšanja emisij CO2 zaradi inovativne tehnologije, vključno s sklicevanjem na veljavni standardni postopek preskušanja v skladu s členom 2(4), ali, če je Komisija takšno metodologijo že odobrila, sklicevanje na odobreno metodologijo;“;
where appropriate, and in addition to the methodology referred to in point (e), a simplified method for evaluating the CO2 savings to be certified or predefined CO2 savings values to be used for the purpose of certification of all vehicles fitted with the innovative technology;’;
kjer je to primerno, in poleg metodologije iz točke (e), poenostavljeno metodo za ocenjevanje prihrankov CO2, ki so predmet certificiranja, ali vnaprej določene vrednosti prihrankov CO2, ki se uporabljajo za namen certificiranja vseh vozil z vgrajeno inovativno tehnologijo;“;
in point (f), points (i) and (ii) are replaced by the following:
v točki (f) se točki (i) in (ii) nadomestita z naslednjim:
the CO2 savings of the innovative technology are not or only partially covered by the standard test procedure CO2 measurement as referred to in Article 12(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 and as specified in Article 2(4) of this Regulation;’;
prihranki CO2 zaradi uporabe inovativne tehnologije niso ali so samo delno zajeti v standardni preskusni postopek za merjenje CO2, kot to določa člen 12(2)(c) Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 in kot je opredeljeno v členu 2(4) te uredbe;“;
in point (f), the following point (iv) is added:
v točki (f) se doda naslednja točka (iv):
in the case of point (ea) of this Article, the CO2 reduction value to be attributed to a vehicle at the moment of certification using the simplified evaluation method, or by way of predefined CO2 savings values as referred to in point (ea), is lower or equal to the emissions reduction achieved by the innovative technology as determined using the testing methodology referred to in point (e), including any possible interactions with other approved eco-innovations.’.
je v primeru točke (ea) tega člena vrednost zmanjšanja CO2, ki bo pripisana vozilu v času certificiranja z uporabo poenostavljene metode ocenjevanja ali z vnaprej določeno vrednostjo prihrankov CO2 v skladu s točko (ea), nižja ali enaka zmanjšanju emisij, doseženemu z inovativno tehnologijo, ki je določeno z metodologijo preskušanja iz točke (e), vključno z morebitnim medsebojnim vplivanjem z drugimi odobrenimi ekološkimi inovacijami.“;
an eco-innovation vehicle that is to be fitted with the innovative technology, or, where appropriate, the innovative technology as a stand-alone component;
ekološko inovativno vozilo, v katerega se vgradi inovativna tehnologija, ali, kjer je to primerno, inovativno tehnologijo kot samostojen sestavni del;
a baseline vehicle that shall not to be fitted with the innovative technology but that is in all other aspects identical to the eco-innovation vehicle, or, where appropriate, a baseline technology as a stand-alone component.’;
osnovno vozilo, v katerega se ne vgradi inovativna tehnologija, vendar je v vseh drugih vidikih enako ekološko inovativnemu vozilu ali, kjer je to primerno, osnovno tehnologijo kot samostojen sestavni del.“;
If the applicant considers that the information referred to in Articles 8 and 9 can be demonstrated by other means than those referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, the application for the approval of an innovative technology as an eco-innovation shall include the necessary details justifying that conclusion and a methodology providing equivalent results.’;
Če vlagatelj meni, da se lahko informacije iz členov 8 in 9 prikažejo na drugačen način, kot je navedeno v odstavku 1 tega člena, mora prošnja za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije vključevati podrobnosti, ki so potrebne za utemeljitev tega mnenja, in metodologijo, s katero se zagotovijo enakovredni rezultati.“;
Where the application for the approval of an innovative technology as an eco-innovation is made by reference to the WLTP as referred to in Article 2(4)(b), the baseline vehicle shall be the vehicle within the interpolation family or the road loads matrix family which represents the worst case for the purpose of demonstrating the eco-innovation savings.
Če se prošnja za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije sklicuje na WLTP v skladu s členom 2(4)(b), je osnovno vozilo tisto vozilo iz skupine interpolacij ali skupine matrik za cestno obremenitev, ki predstavlja najslabši možni primer za namene prikazovanja prihrankov zaradi ekološke inovacije.
In the case referred to in the second subparagraph of point 1.2.3.1 of sub-Annex 6 or point 3.2.3.1 of sub-Annex 7 to Annex XXI to Regulation (EU) 2017/1151, the baseline vehicle shall be the test vehicle H.
V primeru iz drugega pododstavka točke 1.2.3.1 Podpriloge 6 ali točke 3.2.3.1 Podpriloge 7 k Prilogi XXI k Uredbi (EU) 2017/1151 je osnovno vozilo preskusno vozilo H.
The choice of baseline vehicle shall be supported by strong and independent statistical evidence on the basis of which verifiable assumptions about the appropriateness and representativeness of the baseline vehicle can be made.’.
Izbira osnovnega vozila temelji na tehtnih in neodvisnih statističnih dokazih, na podlagi katerih je mogoče preveriti predpostavke o ustreznosti in reprezentativnosti osnovnega vozila.“;
the following paragraph 1a is added:
doda se naslednji odstavek 1a:
Where the applicant is a group of manufacturers or suppliers the following conditions apply:
Kadar je vlagatelj skupina proizvajalcev ali dobaviteljev, veljajo naslednji pogoji:
in the first subparagraph, the following point (ca) is inserted:
v prvi pododstavek se vstavi naslednja točka (ca):
verify, in the case of point (ea) of Article 4(2), that the simplified evaluation method or the predefined CO2 savings values referred to in that point are appropriate for certifying the CO2 savings for the relevant vehicles referred to in point (d) of Article 4(2), and meet the minimum requirements set out in Article 4[2][f](iv);’;
v primeru točke (ea) člena 4(2) preveri, ali so poenostavljena metoda ocenjevanja oz. vnaprej določene vrednosti prihrankov CO2 iz navedene točke primerne za certificiranje prihrankov CO2 za zadevna vozila iz točke (d) člena 4(2) in ali ustrezajo minimalnim zahtevam iz člena 4[2][f](iv);“;
the last subparagraph is replaced by the following:
zadnji pododstavek se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘For the purpose of point (c) and (ca), the independent and certified body shall provide the testing protocols established for the verification.’;
„Za namen točk (c) in (ca) neodvisni in priglašeni organ predloži preskusne protokole, določene za preverjanje.“;
in Paragraph 3, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
v odstavku 3 se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
For the purposes of the certification of the CO2 savings in accordance with Article 11, the independent and certified body shall, at the request of the manufacturer, draw up a report on the interaction between several eco-innovations fitted to one vehicle type, variant, version and, where applicable, interpolation family.’;
Za namene certificiranja prihrankov CO2 v skladu s členom 11 neodvisni in priglašeni organ na zahtevo proizvajalca pripravi poročilo o medsebojnem vplivanju med več ekološkimi inovacijami, vgrajenimi v posamezen tip, varianto ali različico vozila, in, kjer je to primerno, družino interpolacij.“;
Paragraph 4 is deleted.
odstavek 4 se črta;
the CO2 emissions from the baseline vehicle and from the eco-innovation vehicle with the innovative technology in operation resulting from the application of the standard test procedure as specified in accordance with Article 2(4)(a) or (b).’;
emisije CO2 iz osnovnega vozila in ekološko inovativnega vozila z delujočo inovativno tehnologijo, dobljene z uporabo standardnega preskusnega postopka iz člena 2(4)(a) ali (b).“;
‘In the case of applications for the approval of an innovative technology as an eco-innovation made by reference to Article 2(4)(b), the uncertainty shall be assessed and quantified for the purpose of determining the savings. The quantified uncertainty shall be subtracted from the total savings.’;
„V primeru prošenj za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije s sklicevanjem na člen 2(4)(b) se za namen določanja prihrankov oceni in količinsko opredeli negotovost.
the following paragraph 3 is added:
Količinsko opredeljena negotovost se odšteje od skupnega prihranka.“;
In the case of predefined CO2 savings values proposed in accordance with Article 4(2)(ea), those values shall be set at a level that is lower or equal to the total savings determined in accordance with paragraph 2.’.
doda se naslednji odstavek 3:
Article 9 is amended as follows:
V primeru vnaprej določenih vrednosti prihrankov CO2, predlaganih v skladu s členom 4(2)(ea), se te vrednosti določijo na ravni, ki je nižja ali enaka skupnemu prihranku, določenemu v skladu z odstavkom 2.“;
paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
člen 9 se spremeni:
1 g CO2/km in the case of an application made by reference to Article 2(4)(a);
Minimalno zmanjšanje, doseženo z inovativno tehnologijo v skladu s členom 8(2), je:
0,5 g CO2/km in the case of an application made by reference to Article 2(4)(b).’;
1 g CO2/km v primeru prošnje s sklicevanjem na člen 2(4)(a);
in paragraph 2, the wording ‘standard test cycle’ is replaced by ‘standard test procedure’.
0,5 g CO2/km v primeru prošnje s sklicevanjem na člen 2(4)(b).“;
The title of Article 10 is replaced by the following:
v odstavku 2 se besedilo „standardnega preskusnega cikla“ nadomesti z besedilom „standardnega preskusnega postopka“;
‘Article 10
naslov člena 10 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Assessment of an application for the approval of an innovative technology as an eco-innovation’.
„Člen 10
Article 11 is amended as follows:
Ocena prošnje za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije“;
paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
člen 11 se spremeni:
The certified CO2 savings of the eco-innovation demonstrated in accordance with the corresponding decision to approve the innovative technology as an eco-innovation shall be specified separately in both the type-approval documentation and the certificate of conformity in accordance with Directive 2007/46/EC, on the basis of tests carried out by technical services in accordance with Article 11 of that Directive, using the approved testing methodology.
odstavek 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
In the case predefined CO2 savings determined in accordance with Article 4(2)(ea) are specified in the approval decision, the relevant predefined CO2 savings value may be entered directly into the type approval documentation, provided that the approval authority is in a position to confirm that the vehicle is fitted with the technology in accordance with the specifications of the approval decision.’;
Če so prihranki CO2 zaradi ekološke inovacije za posamezen tip, varianto ali različico vozila in, kjer je to primerno, družino interpolacij nižji od ustrezne mejne vrednosti iz člena 9(1), se prihranki ne certificirajo.
In the second subparagraph of paragraph 4, the value ‘1 g CO2/km’ is replaced by ‘0,5 g CO2/km’.
V primeru, da so v sklepu o odobritvi navedeni vnaprej določeni prihranki CO2 v skladu s členom 4(2)(ea), se lahko zadevna vnaprej določena vrednost prihrankov CO2 vnese neposredno v dokumentacijo o homologaciji pod pogojem, da je homologacijski organ zmožen potrditi, da je vozilo opremljeno s tehnologijo v skladu s specifikacijami sklepa o odobritvi.“;
Article 12 is amended as follows:
v drugem pododstavku odstavka 4 se vrednost „1 g CO2/km“ nadomesti z vrednostjo „0,5 g CO2/km“;
in paragraph 1, after the second subparagraph, the following subparagraph is inserted:
člen 12 se spremeni:
‘The Commission may also, whenever it finds or is informed of deviations or inconsistences in the testing methodology or in the innovative technology in comparison to the information it had received as part of the application for the approval of the innovative technology as an eco-innovation, notify this to the manufacturer.’;
v odstavku 1 se za drugim pododstavkom vstavi naslednji pododstavek:
A manufacturer for which the certified CO2 savings are no longer taken into account may apply for a new certification of the vehicles concerned in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11, or may, where appropriate, make a request for an amendment of the approval decision in accordance with Article 12a, which shall be supported by such evidence that is required to confirm the appropriateness of the testing methodology and the level of CO2 savings achieved by the innovative technology.’.
„Komisija lahko obvesti proizvajalca tudi, če ugotovi ali je obveščena, da obstajajo odstopanja ali neskladnosti v metodologiji preskušanja ali inovativni tehnologiji v primerjavi z informacijami, ki jih je prejela v okviru prošnje za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije.“;
The following Article 12a is inserted:
Proizvajalec, pri katerem se certificirani prihranki CO2 ne upoštevajo več, lahko zaprosi za novo certificiranje zadevnih vozil v skladu s postopkom iz člena 11 ali po potrebi vloži zahtevek za spremembo sklepa o odobritvi v skladu s členom 12a, ki mu priloži dokazila, potrebna za potrditev primernosti metodologije preskušanja in ravni prihrankov CO2, doseženih z inovativno tehnologijo.“;
‘Article 12a
vstavi se naslednji člen 12a:
evidence demonstrating that emissions reduction achieved by the innovative technology as determined using the amended testing methodology or, where appropriate, the new or amended simplified evaluation method or predefined CO2 savings, meets the relevant threshold specified in Article 9(1), taking into account any deterioration over time of the technology;
dokazila, da so spremembe potrebne in primerne;
the amended testing methodology meets the requirements set out in Article 6(1) and, where applicable, the requirements set out in Article 4(2)(f)(iv),
( f) posebno poročilo o potrditvi, ki ga je pripravil neodvisen in priglašen organ, ki preverja, ali:
the emissions reduction achieved by the innovative technology as determined using the amended testing methodology or, where appropriate, the new or amended simplified evaluation method or predefined CO2 savings, meets the relevant threshold specified in Article 9(1), taking into account any deterioration over time of the technology.
spremenjena metodologija preskušanja izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 6(1) in, kjer je to primerno, zahteve iz člena 4(2)(f)(iv),
On receipt of the request for amendment, the Commission shall make public the summary description of the amendments proposed referred to in paragraph 2(c).
zmanjšanje emisij, doseženo z inovativno tehnologijo, ki je določeno s spremenjeno metodologijo preskušanja ali, kjer je to primerno, z novo oz. spremenjeno poenostavljeno metodo ocenjevanja, ali vnaprej določeni prihranki CO2 dosegajo ustrezno mejno vrednost iz člena 9(1), pri čemer se upošteva morebitno zastaranje tehnologije.
The Commission shall assess the request for amendment and, within 9 months from receipt of a complete request, it shall amend the approval decision, unless objections are raised in respect of the appropriateness of the proposed amendments.
Komisija ob prejemu zahtevka za spremembo objavi povzetek opisa predlaganih sprememb iz odstavka 2(c).
The assessment period may be extended by 5 months where the Commission finds that, because of the complexity of the innovative technology and the accompanying amended testing methodology or because of the size and content of the request for amendment, the request cannot be appropriately assessed within the 9 months' assessment period.
V tem primeru se Komisija o predlaganih spremembah posvetuje z vložnikom zahtevka ter drugimi zadevnimi udeleženci, vključno s prvotnim vlagateljem prošnje za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije, in po potrebi upošteva njihove pripombe.
The Commission shall consult the original applicant for approval of the innovative technology as an eco-innovation and other relevant stakeholders on the amendments it considers and, where appropriate, take account of the comments received.’.
Komisija lahko kadar koli na lastno pobudo spremeni sklep o odobritvi, zlasti ko gre za upoštevanje tehničnega napredka.
Article 2
Komisija se o predlaganih spremembah posvetuje s prvotnim vlagateljem prošnje za odobritev inovativne tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije in drugimi zadevnimi udeleženci ter po potrebi upošteva njihove pripombe.“
Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 of 1 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 1230/2012 and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 (OJ L 175, 7.7.2017, p. 1).
UL L 145, 31.5.2011, str. 1.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 of 18 July 2008 implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (OJ L 199, 28.7.2008, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1151 z dne 1. junija 2017 o dopolnitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o homologaciji motornih vozil glede na emisije iz lahkih potniških in gospodarskih vozil (Euro 5 in Euro 6) in o dostopu do informacij o popravilu in vzdrževanju vozil, o spremembah Direktive 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 692/2008 in Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1230/2012 ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 692/2008 (UL L 175, 7.7.2017, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153 of 2 June 2017 setting out a methodology for determining the correlation parameters necessary for reflecting the change in the regulatory test procedure and amending Regulation (EU) No 1014/2010 (OJ L 175, 7.7.2017, p. 679).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 692/2008 z dne 18. julija 2008 o izvajanju in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o homologaciji motornih vozil glede na emisije iz lahkih potniških in gospodarskih vozil (Euro 5 in Euro 6) in o dostopu do informacij o popravilu in vzdrževanju vozil (UL L 199, 28.7.2008, str. 1).