natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Regulation should also allow for the verification of the evidence provided in electronic format by the users, where that evidence is submitted without electronic seal or certification from the issuing competent authority, or where the technical tool established by this Regulation or another system enabling the direct exchange or verification of evidence between competent authorities of different Member States is not available.
V takih primerih bi morala biti odločitev pristojnega organa za uporabo IMI prostovoljna, vendar enkrat ko organ zahtevek za informacije ali sodelovanje predloži prek IMI, bi moral zaprošeni pristojni organ obvezno sodelovati in zagotoviti odgovor.
For such cases, this Regulation should provide for an effective mechanism for administrative cooperation among the competent authorities of the Member States, based on the Internal Market Information System (‘IMI’) established by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Zahtevek se lahko prek IMI pošlje pristojnemu organu, ki izdaja dokazila, ali centralnemu organu, ki ga države članice določijo skladno s svojimi upravnimi pravili.
In such cases, the decision of a competent authority to use IMI should be voluntary, but once that authority has submitted a request for information or cooperation through IMI, the requested competent authority should be bound to cooperate and to provide a response.
Da bi se izognili nepotrebnemu podvajanju in ker Uredba (EU) 2016/1191 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta zajema del dokazil, pomembnih za postopke iz te uredbe, se lahko ureditev sodelovanja za IMI iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/1191 uporablja tudi za druga dokazila, ki se zahtevajo v postopkih iz te uredbe.
The request can be sent through IMI either to the competent authority issuing the evidence or to the central authority to be designated by Member States in accordance with their own administrative rules.
Da bi lahko organi, uradi ali agencije Unije postali udeleženci IMI, bi bilo treba spremeniti Uredbo (EU) št. 1024/2012.
To avoid unnecessary duplication and as Regulation (EU) 2016/1191 of the European Parliament and of the Council covers part of the evidence relevant for the procedures covered by this Regulation, the cooperation arrangements for IMI laid down in Regulation (EU) 2016/1191 can also be used for the purpose of other evidence required in procedures covered by this Regulation.
Spletne storitve, ki jih zagotavljajo pristojni organi, so ključne za izboljšanje kakovosti in varnosti storitev za državljane in podjetja.
In order to allow Union bodies, offices or agencies to become actors within IMI, Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 should be amended.
Javne uprave v državah članicah vedno bolj delujejo v smeri ponovne uporabe podatkov in od državljanov in podjetij vse redkeje zahtevajo večkratno predložitev istih informacij.
Online services provided by competent authorities are crucial for increasing the quality and security of the services provided to citizens and businesses.
Za zmanjšanje dodatnega bremena, bi bilo treba ponovno uporabo podatkov spodbujati za čezmejne uporabnike.
Public administrations within Member States are increasingly working towards the reuse of data, dispensing with the requirement that citizens and businesses supply the same information several times.
Da se omogoči zakonita čezmejna izmenjava dokazil in informacij na podlagi uporabe načela „samo enkrat“ po vsej Uniji, bi bilo treba to uredbo in načelo „samo enkrat“ uporabljati skladno z vsemi ustreznimi pravili o varstvu podatkov, vključno z načelom najmanjšega obsega podatkov, točnosti, omejitve shranjevanja, celovitosti in zaupnosti, nujnosti, sorazmernosti in omejitve namena.
The reuse of data should be facilitated for cross-border users in order to reduce additional burden.
Pri njenem izvajanju bi bilo treba popolnoma upoštevati tudi načelo vgrajene varnosti in načelo vgrajene zasebnosti ter spoštovati temeljne pravice posameznikov, vključno tistih v zvezi s pravičnostjo in preglednostjo.
In order to enable the lawful cross-border exchange of evidence and information by means of the Union-wide application of the ‘once-only’ principle, the application of this Regulation and of the ‘once-only’ principle should comply with all applicable data protection rules, including the principle of data minimisation, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity and confidentiality, necessity, proportionality and purpose limitation.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se uporabnikom postopkov zagotovijo jasne informacije o tem, kako bodo osebni podatki, ki se nanašajo nanje, obdelani v skladu s členoma 13 in 14 Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta in členoma 15 in 16 Uredbe (EU) 2018/1725.
Its implementation should also comply fully with the principles of security by design and of privacy by design, and should also respect the fundamental rights of individuals, including those related to fairness and transparency.
Za nadaljnje spodbujanje uporabe spletnih postopkov bi morala ta uredba v skladu z načelom „samo enkrat“ zagotoviti podlago za oblikovanje in uporabo popolnoma delujočega, varnega in zanesljivega tehničnega sistema za avtomatizirano čezmejno izmenjavo dokazil med akterji, udeleženimi v postopku, kadar za to izrecno zaprosijo državljani in podjetja.
Member States should ensure that users of procedures are provided with clear information on how personal data relating to them will be processed in accordance with Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Articles 15 and 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
Kadar izmenjava dokazil vključuje osebne podatke, bi bilo treba zahtevo šteti za izrecno, če vsebuje prostovoljen, specifičen, ozaveščen in nedvoumen izraz posameznikove volje, bodisi z izjavo ali z jasnim pritrdilnim dejanjem, da želi izvesti izmenjavo ustreznih informacij.
In order to further facilitate the use of online procedures, this Regulation should, in line with the ‘once-only’ principle, provide the basis for the creation and use of a fully operational, safe and secure technical system for the automated cross-border exchange of evidence between the actors involved in the procedure, where this is explicitly requested by citizens and businesses.
Če uporabnik ni oseba, na katero se podatki nanašajo, postopek na spletu ne bi smel posegati v njegove pravice iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/679.
Where the exchange of evidence includes personal data, the request should be considered to be explicit if it contains a freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the individual’s wish to have the relevant personal data exchanged, either by statement or by affirmative action.
Čezmejna uporaba načela „samo enkrat“ bi morala privesti do tega, da državljanom in podjetjem istih podatkov ni treba predložiti javnim organom več kot enkrat in da se ti podatki lahko uporabljajo tudi na zahtevo uporabnika za namen opravljanja čezmejnih spletnih postopkov, ki vključujejo čezmejne uporabnike.
If the user is not the person concerned by the data, the online procedure should not affect his or her rights under Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Obveznost uporabe tehničnega sistema za avtomatizirano izmenjavo dokazil med različnimi državami članicami bi za pristojni organ izdajatelj morala veljati le, kadar organi v svoji državi članici dokazila zakonito izdajajo v elektronski obliki, ki omogoča tako avtomatizirano izmenjavo.
The cross-border application of the ‘once-only’ principle should result in citizens and businesses not having to supply the same data to public authorities more than once, and that it should also be possible to use those data at the request of the user for the purposes of completing cross-border online procedures involving cross-border users.
Vsaka čezmejna izmenjava dokazil bi morala imeti ustrezno pravno podlago, kot je Direktiva 2005/36/ES, 2006/123/ES, 2014/24/EU ali 2014/25/EU oziroma za postopke iz Priloge II, drugo veljavno pravo Unije ali nacionalno pravo.
For the issuing competent authority, the obligation to use the technical system for the automated exchange of evidence between different Member States should apply only where authorities lawfully issue, in their own Member State, evidence in an electronic format that makes such an automated exchange possible.
Primerno je, da ta uredba v splošnem določa, da čezmejna avtomatizirana izmenjava dokazil poteka na izrecno zahtevo uporabnika.
Any cross-border exchange of evidence should have an appropriate legal basis such as Directive 2005/36/EC, 2006/123/EC, 2014/24/EU or 2014/25/EU or, for the procedures listed in Annex II, other applicable Union or national law.
Vendar se ta zahteva se ne bi smela uporabljati, kadar ustrezno pravo Unije ali nacionalno pravo dovoljuje avtomatizirano čezmejno izmenjavo podatkov brez izrecne zahteve uporabnika.
It is appropriate that this Regulation lays down, as a general rule, that the cross-border automated exchange of evidence takes place at the explicit request of the user.
Uporaba tehničnega sistema, vzpostavljenega s to uredbo, bi morala ostati prostovoljna, uporabniku pa bi moralo biti omogočeno, da dokazila posreduje na druge načine, zunaj tehničnega sistema.
However, this requirement should not apply where the relevant Union or national law allows for automated cross-border data exchange without an explicit user request.
Uporabnik bi moral imeti možnost vpogleda v dokazila in pravico, da izbere, da ne bo nadaljeval izmenjave dokazil v primeru, ko po vpogledu v dokazila, ki naj bi se izmenjala, ugotovi, da so informacije netočne, zastarele ali presegajo tisto, kar je potrebno za zadevni postopek.
The use of the technical system established by this Regulation should remain voluntary and the user should remain free to submit evidence by other means outside the technical system.
Podatki, vključeni v vpogled, se ne bi smeli hraniti dlje, kot je tehnično potrebno.
The user should have the possibility to preview the evidence and the right to choose not to proceed with the exchange of evidence in cases where the user, after previewing the evidence to be exchanged, discovers that the information is inaccurate, out-of-date, or goes beyond what is necessary for the procedure in question.
Varen tehnični sistem, ki bi ga bilo treba vzpostaviti za izmenjavo dokazil v skladu s to uredbo, bi moral pristojnim organom prosilcem jamčiti, da je dokazilo izdal pravi organ.
The data included in the preview should not be stored longer than is technically necessary.
Pristojni organ bi moral imeti možnost, da pred sprejetjem informacij, ki jih v okviru postopka zagotovi uporabnik, preveri informacije v primeru dvoma, in pride do zaključka, da so točne.
The secure technical system that should be set up to enable the exchange of evidence under this Regulation should also give requesting competent authorities certainty that the evidence has been provided by the right issuing authority.
Obstaja več gradnikov, ki ponujajo osnovne zmogljivosti in se lahko uporabijo za vzpostavitev tehničnega sistema, kot je gradnik Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope, vzpostavljenega z Uredbo (EU) št. 1316/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ter gradnika e-dostave in elektronske identifikacije, ki sta sestavna dela Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope.
Before accepting information provided by a user in the context of a procedure, the competent authority should be able to verify the information where it gives rise to doubts, and to conclude that it is accurate.
Te gradnike sestavljajo tehnične specifikacije, vzorci programske opreme in podporne storitve, njihov namen pa je zagotavljati interoperabilnost med obstoječimi sistemi informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije v različnih državah članicah, tako da lahko državljani, podjetja in uprave, kjer koli se nahajajo v Uniji, uporabljajo brezšivne digitalne javne storitve.
A number of building blocks offering basic capabilities exist that can be used to set up the technical system, such as the Connecting Europe Facility, established by Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and the eDelivery and eID building blocks that form a part of that facility.
Tehnični sistem, vzpostavljen s to uredbo, bi moral biti na voljo poleg drugih sistemov, ki zagotavljajo mehanizme za sodelovanje med organi, kot je IMI, in ne bi smel vplivati na druge sisteme, vključno s sistemom iz Uredbe (ES) št. 987/2009, enotnim evropskim dokumentom v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila iz Direktive 2014/24/EU, elektronsko izmenjavo informacij socialne varnosti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 987/2009, evropsko poklicno izkaznico iz Direktive 2005/36/ES, medsebojno povezavo nacionalnih registrov ter medsebojno povezavo centralnih in trgovinskih registrov ter registrov podjetij iz Direktive (EU) 2017/1132 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter medsebojno povezanost registrov insolventnosti iz Uredbe (EU) 2015/848 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Those building blocks consist of technical specifications, sample software and supporting services, and aim to ensure interoperability between the existing information and communication technology (ICT) systems in different Member States so that citizens, businesses and administrations, wherever they are in the Union, can benefit from seamless digital public services.
Da bi se zagotovili enotni pogoji za izvajanje tehničnega sistema za avtomatizirano izmenjavo dokazil, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila za določitev zlasti tehničnih in operativnih specifikacij sistema za obdelavo zahtevka uporabnika za izmenjavo dokazil, prenos takih dokazil, kot tudi za določitev pravil, potrebnih za zagotovitev integritete in zaupnosti prenosa.
The technical system established by this Regulation should be available in addition to other systems providing mechanisms for cooperation between authorities, such as IMI, and should not affect other systems, including the system provided for in Regulation (EC) No 987/2009, the European Single Procurement Document, under Directive 2014/24/EU, the Electronic Exchange of Social Security Information, under Regulation (EC) No 987/2009, the European Professional Card, under Directive 2005/36/EC, the interconnection of national registers and the interconnection of central, commercial and company registers, under Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and the interconnection of insolvency registers, under Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of a technical system allowing for the automated exchange of evidence, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to lay down, in particular the technical and operational specifications of a system for the processing of a user’s request for evidence to be exchanged and for the transfer of such evidence, as well as to lay down the rules necessary to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of the transfer.
Za zagotovitev visoke ravni varnosti tehničnega sistema za čezmejno uporabo načela „samo enkrat“ pri sprejemanju izvedbenih aktov, bi morala Komisija pri sprejemanju izvedbenih aktov, s katerimi določi specifikacije takega tehničnega sistema, ustrezno upoštevati standarde in tehnične specifikacije, ki jih pripravijo evropske in mednarodne organizacije in organi za standardizacijo, zlasti Evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN), Evropski inštitut za telekomunikacijske standarde (ETSI), Mednarodna organizacija za standardizacijo (ISO) in Mednarodna telekomunikacijska zveza (ITU), kakor tudi varnostne standarde iz člena 32 Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 in člena 22 Uredbe (EU) 2018/1725.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Kadar je to potrebno za zagotovitev razvoja, razpoložljivosti, vzdrževanja, nadzora, spremljanja in varnostnega upravljanja delov tehničnega sistema, za katere je odgovorna Komisija, bi morala Komisija po potrebi za nasvet zaprositi Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov.
With a view to ensuring that the technical system provides a high level of security for the cross-border application of the ‘once-only’ principle, the Commission should, when adopting implementing acts setting out the specifications for such a technical system, take due account of the standards and technical specifications drawn up by European and international standardisation organisations and bodies, in particular the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), as well as of the security standards referred to in Article 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 22 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
Pristojni organi in Komisija bi morali zagotoviti, da so informacije, postopki in storitve, za katere so odgovorni, skladne z merili glede kakovosti.
Where necessary in order to ensure the development, availability, maintenance, supervision, monitoring and security management of the parts of the technical system for which the Commission is responsible, the Commission should request the advice of the European Data Protection Supervisor.
Nacionalni koordinatorji, imenovani na podlagi te uredbe, in Komisija bi morali redno nadzirati skladnost z merili glede kakovosti in varnosti na nacionalni ravni oziroma ravni Unije ter obravnavati morebitne težave.
The competent authorities and the Commission should ensure that the information, procedures and services for which they are responsible comply with the quality criteria.
Nacionalni koordinatorji bi morali poleg tega pomagati Komisiji pri spremljanju delovanja tehničnega sistema, ki omogoča čezmejno izmenjavo dokazil.
The national coordinators appointed under this Regulation and the Commission should, at regular intervals, supervise compliance with the quality and security criteria at national and Union level respectively, and address any problems that arise.
Ta uredba bi morala Komisiji zagotoviti vrsto sredstev za obravnavo poslabšanja kakovosti storitev, zagotovljenih prek vstopnega mesta, odvisno od resnosti in trajanja takega poslabšanja, po potrebi z vključitvijo usklajevalne skupine za vstopno mesto.
The national coordinators should in addition assist the Commission in monitoring the functioning of the technical system enabling the cross-border exchange of evidence.
To ne bi smelo prejudicirati splošne odgovornosti Komisije v zvezi s spremljanjem skladnosti s to uredbo.
This Regulation should afford the Commission a range of means to address any deterioration in the quality of services offered through the gateway, depending on the seriousness and persistence of such deterioration, involving, where necessary, the gateway coordination group.
Ta uredba bi morala podrobno določiti glavne funkcije tehničnih orodij, ki podpirajo delovanje vstopnega mesta, zlasti skupnega uporabniškega vmesnika, repozitorija za povezave in skupnega iskalnika storitev za pomoč.
This should not prejudge the overall responsibility of the Commission regarding the monitoring of the compliance with this Regulation.
Skupni uporabniški vmesnik bi moral zagotoviti, da lahko uporabniki na nacionalnih spletnih mestih in na spletnih mestih Unije zlahka najdejo informacije, postopke ter storitve za pomoč in reševanje težav.
This Regulation should specify the main functionalities of the technical tools supporting the functioning of the gateway, in particular the common user interface, the repository for links, and the common assistance service finder.
Države članice in Komisija bi si morale prizadevati za zagotavljanje povezav do enega samega vira informacij, potrebnih za vstopno mesto, da se prepreči zmeda med uporabniki, ki jo povzročajo različni, popolnoma ali delno podvojeni viri z enakimi informacijami.
The common user interface should ensure that users can easily find information, procedures and assistance and problem-solving services on national and Union level websites.
To ne bi smelo izključiti možnosti zagotavljanja povezav z istimi informacijami, ki jih nudijo lokalni ali regionalni pristojni organi glede različnih geografskih območij.
Member States and the Commission should aim to provide links to a single source of the information required for the gateway in order to avoid confusion among the users as a result of different or fully or partly duplicative sources of the same information.
Prav tako to ne bi smelo preprečiti določenega podvajanja informacij, kadar je to neizogibno ali zaželeno, na primer, kadar se nekatere pravice, obveznosti in pravila Unije ponovijo ali so opisani na nacionalnih spletnih straneh zaradi večje prijaznosti do uporabnika.
This should not exclude the possibility of providing links to the same information offered by local or regional competent authorities regarding different geographical areas.
Za zmanjšanje človeškega posredovanja pri posodabljanju povezav, ki se uporabljajo pri skupnem uporabniškem vmesniku, bi bilo treba, kadar je to tehnično izvedljivo, vzpostaviti neposredno povezavo med ustreznimi tehničnimi sistemi držav članic in repozitorijem za povezave.
It should also not prevent some duplication of information where this is unavoidable or desirable, for instance where some Union rights, obligations and rules are repeated or described on national webpages to improve user-friendliness.
Skupna podporna orodja informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije lahko za izboljšanje interoperabilnosti s katalogi in semantiko storitev na nacionalni ravni uporabljajo osnovno besedišče javnih storitev (CPSV).
To minimise human intervention in the updating of the links to be used by the common user interface, a direct connection between the relevant technical systems of the Member States and the repository for links should, where technically possible, be established.
Države članice bi bilo treba spodbujati k uporabi CPSV, vendar se lahko odločijo za uporabo nacionalnih rešitev.
The common ICT support tools might use the Core Public Services Vocabulary (CPSV) to facilitate interoperability with national service catalogues and semantics.
Informacije, vključene v repozitorij za povezave, bi morale biti javno dostopne v odprti, splošno uporabljeni in strojno berljivi obliki, na primer z vmesniki za aplikacijsko programiranje, da se omogoči njihova ponovna uporaba.
Member States should be encouraged to use the CPSV, but are free to decide to use national solutions.
Iskalni pripomoček skupnega uporabniškega vmesnika bi moral uporabnike usmeriti k informacijam, ki jih potrebujejo kjer koli že je, na spletnih straneh Unije ali na nacionalnih spletnih straneh.
The information included in the repository for links should be made publicly available in open, commonly used and machine-readable format, for example by application programming interfaces (APIs), in order to enable its reuse.
Poleg tega bo kot alternativni način usmerjanja uporabnikov k koristnim informacijam še naprej koristen za vzpostavljanje povezav med obstoječimi in komplementarnimi spletnimi mesti ali spletnimi stranmi, njihovo čim večje poenostavljanje in združevanje ter vzpostavljanje povezav med spletnimi stranmi in spletnimi mesti na ravni Unije in na nacionalni ravni, ki zagotavljajo dostop do spletnih storitev in informacij.
The search facility of the common user interface should lead users to the information they need wherever it is on Union or national level webpages.
V tej uredbi bi morale biti navedene tudi zahteve glede kakovosti za skupni uporabniški vmesnik.
In addition, as an alternative way to guide users to useful information, it will continue to be helpful to create links between existing and complementary websites or webpages, streamlining and grouping them together as much as possible, and to create links between webpages and websites at Union and national level providing access to online services and information.
Komisija bi morala zagotoviti, da je skupni uporabniški vmesnik skladen s temi zahtevami, še zlasti pa, da je vmesnik na voljo in dostopen na spletu prek različnih kanalov ter da je enostaven za uporabo.