natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The personal data in the applications should be compared with the data present in a record, file or alert registered in an EU information system or database (the ETIAS Central System, SIS, the Visa Information System (VIS), the Entry/Exit System (EES) or Eurodac), in Europol data or in the Interpol databases (the Interpol Stolen and Lost Travel Document database (SLTD) or the Interpol Travel Documents Associated with Notices database (TDAWN)).
Kategorije osebnih podatkov, ki bi jih bilo treba uporabiti za primerjavo, bi morale biti omejene na kategorije podatkov, prisotne v vpogledanih informacijskih sistemih EU, med podatki Europola in v Interpolovih podatkovnih zbirkah, na nadzornem seznamu ETIAS ali v specifičnih kazalnikih tveganja.
The personal data in the applications should also be compared against the ETIAS watchlist and against specific risk indicators.
Primerjava bi morala potekati z avtomatiziranimi sredstvi.
The categories of personal data that should be used for comparison should be limited to the categories of data present in those EU information systems that are consulted, in Europol data, in Interpol databases, in the ETIAS watchlist or in the specific risk indicators.
Kadar se pri taki primerjavi pokaže ujemanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadetek) med katerim koli osebnim podatkom ali kombinacijo teh v prošnji in specifičnimi kazalniki tveganja ali osebnimi podatki v evidenci, dosjeju ali razpisu ukrepa v navedenih informacijskih sistemih ali na nadzornem seznamu ETIAS, bi morala prošnjo ročno obdelati nacionalna enota ETIAS pristojne države članice.
The comparison should take place by automated means.
Ocena, ki jo izvede nacionalna enota ETIAS, bi morala biti podlaga za odločitev o tem, ali se potovalna odobritev izda ali ne.
Whenever such comparison reveals that a correspondence (a ‘hit’) exists between any of the personal data or combination thereof in the application and the specific risk indicators or the personal data either in a record, file or alert in the above information systems or in the ETIAS watchlist, the application should be processed manually by the ETIAS National Unit of the Member State responsible.
Načeloma naj bi velika večina prošenj pozitiven odgovor prejela z avtomatiziranimi sredstvi.
The assessment performed by the ETIAS National Unit should lead to the decision to issue the travel authorisation or not to do so.
Potovalne odobritve ne bi smelo biti mogoče zavrniti, razveljaviti ali preklicati zgolj na podlagi avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov, navedenih v prošnjah.
It is expected that the vast majority of applications will obtain a positive answer by automated means.
Zato bi morala prošnje, za katere se zabeleži zadetek, ročno obdelati nacionalna enota ETIAS.
No refusal, annulment or revocation of a travel authorisation should be based only on the automated processing of personal data in the applications.
Prosilci, ki jim je bila potovalna odobritev zavrnjena, bi morali imeti pravico do pritožbe.
For this reason, the applications generating a hit should be processed manually by an ETIAS National Unit.
Pritožbe bi bilo treba vložiti v državi članici, ki je sprejela odločitev o prošnji, v skladu z njenim nacionalnim pravom.
Applicants who have been refused a travel authorisation should have the right to appeal.
Pri preučitvi dosjeja prosilca bi bilo treba uporabljati pravila ETIAS za varnostno preverjanje, tako da bi bilo mogoče primerjati v njem zabeležene podatke in specifične kazalnike tveganja, ki ustrezajo predhodno ugotovljenemu tveganju za varnost ali nezakonito priseljevanje oziroma visokemu tveganju za epidemijo.
Appeals should be conducted in the Member State that has taken the decision on the application and in accordance with the national law of that Member State.
Merila za opredelitev specifičnih kazalnikov tveganja ne bi smela v nobenem primeru temeljiti izključno na spolu ali starosti osebe.
The ETIAS screening rules should be used to analyse an application file by enabling a comparison between the data recorded in it and specific risk indicators corresponding to previously identified security, illegal immigration or high epidemic risks.
Prav tako ne bi smela v nobenem primeru temeljiti na informacijah, ki razkrivajo barvo kože, raso, etnično ali socialno poreklo, genetske značilnosti, jezik, politično ali kakršno koli drugo stališče, versko ali filozofsko prepričanje, članstvo v sindikatih, pripadnost narodni manjšini, premoženje, rojstvo, invalidnost ali spolno usmerjenost osebe.
The criteria used for defining the specific risk indicators should in no circumstances be based solely on a person’s sex or age.
Specifične kazalnike tveganja bi morala opredeliti, določiti, predhodno oceniti, izvesti, naknadno vrednotiti, revidirati in črtati centralna enota ETIAS po posvetovanju z odborom za varnostno preverjanje ETIAS, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki nacionalnih enot ETIAS in sodelujočih agencij.
They should also in no circumstances be based on information revealing a person’s colour, race, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, political or any other opinion, religion or philosophical belief, trade union membership, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, or sexual orientation.
Da bi prispevali k spoštovanju temeljnih pravic pri izvajanju pravil ETIAS za varnostno preverjanje in specifičnih kazalnikov tveganja, bi bilo treba ustanoviti usmerjevalni odbor ETIAS za temeljne pravice.
The specific risk indicators should be defined, established, assessed ex ante, implemented, evaluated ex post, revised and deleted by the ETIAS Central Unit following consultation of an ETIAS screening board composed of representatives of the ETIAS National Units and the agencies involved.
Sekretariat za njegove sestanke bi moral zagotoviti uradnik za temeljne pravice Evropske agencije za mejno in obalno stražo.
To help ensure the respect of fundamental rights in the implementation of the ETIAS screening rules and specific risk indicators, an ETIAS Fundamental Rights Guidance Board should be established.
Treba bi bilo vzpostaviti nadzorni seznam ETIAS za namene prepoznavanja povezav med podatki v dosjeju prosilca in informacijami v zvezi z osebami, ki so osumljene storitve terorističnega kaznivega dejanja ali drugega hudega kaznivega dejanja ali udeležbe pri njem ali za katere so na podlagi celovite ocene oseb podani stvarni indici ali utemeljeni razlogi za sum, da bodo storile teroristično kaznivo dejanje ali drugo hudo kaznivo dejanje.
The secretariat for its meetings should be provided by the Fundamental Rights Officer of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.
Nadzorni seznam ETIAS bi moral biti del centralnega sistema ETIAS.
An ETIAS watchlist should be established for the purposes of identifying connections between data in an application file and information related to persons who are suspected of having committed or having taken part in a terrorist offence or other serious criminal offence or regarding whom there are factual indications or reasonable grounds, based on an overall assessment of a person, to believe that they will commit a terrorist offence or other serious criminal offences.
Podatke bi morali na nadzorni seznam ETIAS vnašati Europol, in sicer brez poseganja v ustrezne določbe o mednarodnem sodelovanju iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/794 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, in države članice.
The ETIAS watchlist should form part of the ETIAS Central System.
Pred vnosom podatkov na nadzorni seznam ETIAS bi bilo treba presoditi, da so primerni, točni in dovolj pomembni za vključitev na nadzorni seznam ETIAS in da njihova vključitev ne bi povzročila, da bi bilo treba nesorazmerno število prošenj obdelovati ročno.
Data should be entered into the ETIAS watchlist by Europol, without prejudice to the relevant provisions on international cooperation in Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and by Member States.
Da bi zagotovili stalno točnost podatkov, bi jih bilo treba redno pregledovati in preverjati.
Before entering data into the ETIAS watchlist, it should be determined that the data are adequate, accurate and important enough to be included in the ETIAS watchlist and that their entry would not lead to a disproportionate number of applications being processed manually.
Nenehno pojavljanje novih oblik varnostnih groženj, novih vzorcev tveganja za nezakonito priseljevanje in visokega tveganja za epidemije zahteva učinkovite odgovore, ob uporabi sodobnih sredstev.
The data should be regularly reviewed and verified to ensure their continued accuracy.
Ker ta sredstva pogosto vključujejo obdelavo velikega števila osebnih podatkov, bi bilo treba uvesti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe, da bi poseganje v pravico do spoštovanja zasebnega življenja in pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov omejili na to, kar je potrebno v demokratični družbi.
The continuous emergence of new forms of security threats, new patterns of illegal immigration and high epidemic risks requires effective responses using modern means.
Osebni podatki v ETIAS bi morali zato biti varovani.
Since these means often involve the processing of significant amounts of personal data, appropriate safeguards should be introduced to keep the interference with the right to protection of private life and to the right of protection of personal data limited to what is necessary in a democratic society.
Dostop do njih bi moral biti strogo omejen na pooblaščeno osebje.
Personal data in ETIAS should therefore be kept secure.
Na podlagi dostopa do teh podatkov v nobenem primeru ne bi smela biti sprejeta kakršna koli diskriminatorna odločitev.
Access to them should be limited to strictly authorised personnel.
Osebni podatki bi morali biti varno shranjeni v prostorih Evropske agencije za operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice (eu-LISA) v Uniji.
In no circumstances should access be used to reach decisions based on any form of discrimination.
Izdane potovalne odobritve bi morale biti razveljavljene ali preklicane takoj, ko postane jasno, da pogoji za njihovo izdajo niso bili ali niso več izpolnjeni.
The personal data stored should be kept securely in the facilities of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) in the Union.
Zlasti kadar je v SIS vnesen nov razpis ukrepa za zavrnitev vstopa in prepoved bivanja ali razpis ukrepa, ki kaže, da je potna listina izgubljena, ukradena, odtujena ali razveljavljena, bi moral SIS o tem obvestiti ETIAS.
Issued travel authorisations should be annulled or revoked as soon as it becomes evident that the conditions for issuing them were not or are no longer met.
Ta bi nato moral preveriti, ali se novi razpis ukrepa ujema z veljavno potovalno odobritvijo.
In particular, where a new alert for refusal of entry and stay or an alert reporting a travel document as lost, stolen, misappropriated or invalidated is entered in SIS, SIS should inform ETIAS.
Kadar je izdan nov razpis ukrepa za zavrnitev vstopa in prepoved bivanja, bi morala nacionalna enota ETIAS pristojne države članice potovalno odobritev preklicati.
ETIAS should then verify whether this new alert corresponds to a valid travel authorisation.
Kadar je potovalna odobritev povezana s potno listino, ki je bila prijavljena kot izgubljena, ukradena, odtujena ali razveljavljena v SIS ali kot izgubljena, ukradena ali razveljavljena v SLTD, bi morala nacionalna enota ETIAS pristojne države članice ročno obdelati dosje prosilca.
Where a new refusal of entry and stay alert has been issued, the ETIAS National Unit of the Member State responsible should revoke the travel authorisation.
Z uporabo podobnega pristopa bi bilo treba s primerjavo novih podatkov, vnesenih na nadzorni seznam ETIAS, in dosjejev prosilcev, shranjenih v ETIAS, preveriti, ali se ti novi podatki ujemajo z veljavno potovalno odobritvijo.
Where the travel authorisation is linked to a travel document reported as lost, stolen, misappropriated or invalidated in SIS, or reported as lost, stolen or invalidated in SLTD, the ETIAS National Unit of the Member State responsible should manually process the application file.
V tem primeru bi morala nacionalna enota ETIAS države članice, ki je nove podatke vnesla, ali – če je podatke vnesel Europol – države članice prvega načrtovanega bivanja oceniti zadetek in potovalno odobritev po potrebi preklicati.
Following a similar approach, new data entered into the ETIAS watchlist should be compared with the application files stored in ETIAS in order to verify whether those new data correspond to a valid travel authorisation.
Prav tako bi moralo biti mogoče preklicati potovalno odobritev na zahtevo prosilca.
In such cases, the ETIAS National Unit of the Member State that entered the new data, or the Member State of first intended stay in the case of data entered by Europol, should assess the hit and, where necessary, revoke the travel authorisation.
Če država članica v izjemnih okoliščinah meni, da je iz humanitarnih razlogov, zaradi nacionalnega interesa ali zaradi mednarodnih obveznosti državljanu tretje države treba dovoliti, da potuje na njeno ozemlje, bi morala imeti možnost, da izda potovalno odobritev, ki velja samo za omejeno ozemlje in obdobje.
It should also be possible to revoke a travel authorisation at the request of the applicant.
Pred vkrcanjem bi morali biti letalski in ladijski prevozniki ter prevozniki v mednarodnem prometu, ki po kopenski poti z avtobusom prevažajo skupine, obvezani preveriti, ali imajo potniki veljavno potovalno odobritev.
When, in exceptional circumstances, a Member State considers it necessary to allow a third-country national to travel to its territory on humanitarian grounds, for reasons of national interest or because of international obligations, it should have the possibility to issue a travel authorisation valid only for a limited territory and period.
Sam dosje v ETIAS prevoznikom ne bi smel biti na voljo.
Prior to boarding, air and sea carriers and international carriers transporting groups overland by coach should have the obligation to verify that travellers are in possession of a valid travel authorisation.
Prevozniki bi morali imeti varen dostop do informacijskega sistema ETIAS, ki bi jim omogočal vpogled vanj na podlagi podatkov iz potne listine.
The ETIAS file itself should not be accessible to carriers.
Tehnične specifikacije za dostop do informacijskega sistema ETIAS prek portala za prevoznike bi morale čim bolj omejiti učinek na potovanja potnikov in prevoznike.
Carriers should have secure access to the ETIAS Information System to allow them to consult it using travel document data.
V ta namen bi bilo treba preučiti možnost povezovanja s SVI.
The technical specifications for accessing the ETIAS Information System through the carrier gateway should limit the impact on passenger travel and carriers to the extent possible.
Da bi omejili vpliv obveznosti, ki jih ta uredba nalaga prevoznikom v mednarodnem prometu, ki po kopenski poti z avtobusom prevažajo skupine, bi bilo treba dati na voljo uporabnikom prijazne mobilne rešitve.
For this purpose, integration with the EES should be considered.
V dveh letih po začetku delovanja ETIAS bi morala Komisija oceniti ustreznost, združljivost in skladnost določb iz člena 26 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah za namene določb o ETIAS glede kopenskega prevoza z avtobusom.
With a view to limiting the impact of the obligations set out in this Regulation on international carriers transporting groups overland by coach, user-friendly mobile solutions should be made available.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba nedavni razvoj kopenskega prevoza z avtobusom.
Within two years following the start of operations of ETIAS, the appropriateness, compatibility and coherence of provisions referred to in Article 26 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders for the purposes of the ETIAS provisions for overland transport by coaches should be assessed by the Commission.
Preučiti bi bilo treba potrebo po spremembi določb glede kopenskega prevoza z avtobusom iz člena 26 navedene konvencije ali te uredbe.
The recent evolution of overland transport by coaches should be taken into account.
Zaradi zagotavljanja skladnosti s spremenjenimi pogoji za vstop bi morali mejni policisti preverjati, ali imajo potniki veljavno potovalno odobritev.
The need for amending provisions concerning overland transport by coaches referred to in Article 26 of that Convention or this Regulation should be considered.
Zato bi morali mejni policisti v okviru standardnega postopka mejne kontrole podatke v potni listini odčitati elektronsko.
In order to ensure compliance with the revised conditions for entry, border guards should check whether travellers are in possession of a valid travel authorisation.
S tem bi se moralo sprožiti poizvedovanje v različnih podatkovnih zbirkah v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah), vključno s poizvedovanjem v ETIAS, kar bi moralo privesti do prikaza posodobljenega statusa potovalne odobritve.
Therefore, during the standard border check process, border guards should read travel document data electronically.
Mejni policisti bi morali imeti dostop do nekaterih podatkov v dosjeju v ETIAS, da bi si z njimi pomagali pri izpolnjevanju svojih nalog.
If there is no valid travel authorisation, the border guard should refuse entry and should complete the border check process accordingly.
Takšno oznako bi moralo biti mogoče dodati tudi na zahtevo države članice, s katero je opravljeno posvetovanje.
If there is a valid travel authorisation, the decision to authorise or refuse entry should be taken by the border guard.
Kadar nacionalna enota ETIAS pristojne države članice meni, da je bil konkreten zadetek, sprožen med obdelavo prošnje, napačen, ali se pri ročni obdelavi izkaže, da ni bilo razloga za zavrnitev potovalne odobritve, bi morala imeti možnost, da potovalni odobritvi, ki jo izda, doda oznako, da olajša mejno kontrolo, in sicer tako da mejnim organom zagotovi informacije, povezane z opravljenimi preverjanji, ter da olajša mejne kontrole in omeji negativne posledice napačnih zadetkov za potnike.
Certain data in the ETIAS file should be accessible to border guards to assist them in carrying out their tasks.
Operativna navodila mejnim organom za obravnavo potovalnih odobritev bi bilo treba opredeliti v praktičnem priročniku.
Where the ETIAS National Unit of the Member State responsible considers that some aspects of the application for a travel authorisation deserve further examination by the border authorities, it should be able to attach a flag to the travel authorisation it issues, recommending a second line check at the border crossing point.
Ker je eden od pogojev za vstop in bivanje določenih kategorij državljanov tretjih držav posedovanje veljavne potovalne odobritve, bi morali organi držav članic, pristojni za priseljevanje, imeti možnost vpogleda v centralni sistem ETIAS, kadar je bilo opravljeno predhodno iskanje v SVI, iz katerega je razvidno, da SVI ne vsebuje zapisa o vstopu, ki bi ustrezal prisotnosti državljana tretje države na ozemlju držav članic.
It should also be possible for such a flag to be attached at the request of a consulted Member State.
Ti organi bi morali imeti dostop do določenih informacij, shranjenih v centralnem sistemu ETIAS, zlasti za namen vračanja.
Where the ETIAS National Unit of the Member State responsible considers that a specific hit triggered during the processing of the application constitutes a false hit or where the manual processing shows that there were no grounds for refusing a travel authorisation, it should be able to attach a flag to the travel authorisation it issues to facilitate border checks by providing border authorities with information related to the verifications that have been carried out and to limit the negative consequences of false hits on travellers.
V okviru boja proti terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem in drugim hudim kaznivim dejanjem ter zaradi globalizacije kriminalnih mrež je nujno, da imajo imenovani organi, pristojni za preprečevanje, odkrivanje ali preiskovanje terorističnih kaznivih dejanj in drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj (v nadaljnjem besedilu: imenovani organi), potrebne informacije za učinkovito izvajanje svojih nalog.
Operational instructions for border authorities for handling travel authorisations should be provided in a practical handbook.
Dostop do podatkov v VIS v ta namen se je že izkazal za učinkovitega kot pomoč preiskovalcem, da so lahko znatno napredovali pri zadevah, povezanih s trgovino z ljudmi, terorizmom ali neupravičenim prometom s prepovedanimi drogami.
Since the possession of a valid travel authorisation is a condition of entry and stay for certain categories of third-country national, the immigration authorities of the Member States should be able to consult the ETIAS Central System when a prior search has been conducted in the EES and this search indicates that the EES does not contain an entry record corresponding to the presence of the third-country national on the territory of the Member States.
VIS ne vsebuje podatkov o državljanih tretjih držav, ki so oproščeni vizumske obveznosti.
Immigration authorities of the Member States should have access to certain information stored in the ETIAS Central System, in particular for the purpose of returns.
Dostop do informacij, ki jih vsebuje ETIAS, je potreben zaradi preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, navedenih v Direktivi (EU) 2017/541 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj, navedenih v Okvirnem sklepu Sveta 2002/584/PNZ.
In the fight against terrorist offences and other serious criminal offences and given the globalisation of criminal networks, it is imperative that designated authorities responsible for the prevention, detection or investigation of terrorist offences and other serious criminal offences (‘designated authorities’) have the necessary information to perform their tasks effectively.
V konkretni preiskavi in z namenom, da pridobijo dokaze in informacije v zvezi z osebo, za katero obstaja sum, da je storila hudo kaznivo dejanje, ali ki je žrtev hudega kaznivega dejanja, lahko imenovani organi potrebujejo dostop do podatkov, generiranih v ETIAS.
Access to data contained in the VIS for such purposes has already proven effective in helping investigators to make substantial progress in cases related to trafficking in human beings, terrorism or drug trafficking.
Podatki, shranjeni v ETIAS, bi bili lahko potrebni tudi za ugotavljanje istovetnosti storilca terorističnega kaznivega dejanja ali drugega hudega kaznivega dejanja, zlasti če je treba nujno ukrepati.
VIS does not contain data on visa-exempt third-country nationals.
Dostop do ETIAS za namene preprečevanja, odkrivanja ali preiskovanja terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj pomeni poseganje v temeljni pravici do spoštovanja zasebnega življenja in varstva osebnih podatkov tistih oseb, katerih osebni podatki se obdelujejo v ETIAS.
Access to the information contained in ETIAS is necessary to prevent, detect and investigate terrorist offences as referred to in Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council or other serious criminal offences as referred to in Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA.
Zato bi bilo treba podatke v ETIAS hraniti in dati na voljo imenovanim organom držav članic ter Europolu ob upoštevanju strogih pogojev iz te uredbe.