natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Parties concerned
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku pregleda, zahtevati zaslišanje.
The Commission officially informed the exporting producers, importers, known users, the representatives of the exporting countries, the applicant and the Union producers mentioned in the request of the initiation of the review.
Vzorčenje
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time-limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Glede na veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Rusiji in Ukrajini ter veliko število uvoznikov je bilo v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe v obvestilu o začetku pregleda najprej predvideno vzorčenje za proizvajalce izvoznike in uvoznike.
Sampling
Da bi Komisija lahko ugotovila, ali je vzorčenje dejansko potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bile navedene strani pozvane, naj se v 15 dneh po začetku postopka javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku pregleda.
In view of the large number of exporting producers in Russia and Ukraine and the large number of importers, sampling for exporting producers and importers was initially envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisiji so se v roku javili samo dva ruska proizvajalca izvoznika (skupina TMK in skupina ChTPZ, v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj: dve skupini ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov) in en ukrajinski proizvajalec izvoznik (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupina Interpipe).
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be indeed necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the above parties were requested to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the proceeding and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Zato je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se vzorčenje za proizvajalce izvoznike ne izvede.
Only two Russian exporting producers (TMK Group and ChTPZ Group, ‘the two groups of Russian exporting producers’) and one Ukrainian exporting producer (‘Interpipe Group’) came forward and made themselves known within the deadline.
Noben uvoznik ni predložil informacij, zahtevanih v obvestilu o začetku pregleda, ali izrazil pripravljenosti za sodelovanje s Komisijo.
Therefore it was decided not to apply sampling in the case of the exporting producers.
So pa štirje uvozniki ob začetku postopka predložili svoja stališča.
No importer provided the information requested in the notice of initiation and expressed its willingness to cooperate with the Commission.
Zato se je Komisija odločila, da ne bo izvedla vzorčenja.
However, four importers sent submissions upon the initiation of the procedure.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla tudi, da je v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
Therefore, the Commission decided not to apply sampling.
Dvanajst proizvajalcev Unije je pred začetkom postopka predložilo informacije, zahtevane za izbor vzorca, in izrazilo pripravljenost za sodelovanje s Komisijo.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission had also stated that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers, in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi navedenega je Komisija začasno izbrala vzorec treh proizvajalcev, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so reprezentativni za industrijo Unije v smislu obsega proizvodnje in prodaje podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
Prior to the initiation, twelve Union producers had provided the information requested for the selection of the sample and expressed their willingness to cooperate with the Commission.
Po nezadostnem sodelovanju enega izmed vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe v zvezi s to družbo je Komisija zadevnega začasno izbranega proizvajalca nadomestila z dvema drugima proizvajalcema Unije.
On that basis, the Commission had provisionally selected a sample of three producers, which were found to be representative of the Union industry in terms of volume of production and sales of the like product in the Union.
Končni vzorec proizvajalcev Unije je zato vključeval družbe Arcelor Mittal Tubular Products, Benteler Steel Tube GmbH, Dalmine S.p.A. in Zeleziarne Podbrezova a.s.
Following insufficient cooperation of one of the sampled Union producers and application of the provision of Article 18 of the basic Regulation with regard to this company, the Commission replaced the provisionally selected producer in question by two other Union producers.
Vprašalniki
Therefore, the final sample of the Union producers consists of Arcelor Mittal Tubular Products, Benteler Steel Tube GmbH, Dalmine SpA, and Zeleziarne Podbrezova a.s.
Vprašalniki so bili torej poslani petim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije (skupno iz prvotnega in končnega vzorca), štirim uvoznikom, dvema skupinama ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in skupini Interpipe.
Questionnaires
Na vprašalnik ni odgovorila nobena od dveh skupin ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Questionnaires were therefore sent to the five sampled Union producers (total of the original and of final sample), to four importers, to the two groups of Russian exporting producers and to Interpipe Group.
Ruski organi so bili obveščeni o nesodelovanju in nameri Komisije, da uporabi člen 18 osnovne uredbe.
Neither of the two groups of Russian exporting producers replied to the questionnaire.
Oba proizvajalca sta kljub temu poslala pripombe, s katerimi sta oporekala pravilnosti zahtevka in nasprotovala nadaljevanju ukrepov.
The Russian authorities were informed of the non-cooperation and the intention of the Commission to apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Vprašalnike je izpolnilo pet proizvajalcev Unije in en sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik iz Ukrajine.
Both producers nevertheless sent comments disputing the accuracy of the request and opposing the continuation of the measures.
Vprašalnika ni izpolnil nobeden od štirih uvoznikov Unije.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from the five Union producers and the sole cooperating Ukrainian exporting producer.
Preveritveni obiski
No reply to the questionaries was further received from the four Union importers.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki jih je štela za potrebne, da ugotovi, kakšna je verjetnost nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in posledične škode, ter informacije v interesu Unije.
Verification visits
Preveritveni obiski so bili izvedeni v prostorih naslednjih družb:
The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of determining the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and resulting injury and of the Union interest.
proizvajalci Unije:
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Arcelor Mittal Tubular Products, Ostrava, Češka,
Union producers
Benteler Steel Tube GmbH, Paderborn, Nemčija,
Arcelor Mittal Tubular Products, Ostrava, Czech Republic,
Dalmine S.p.A., Bergamo, Italija,
Benteler Steel Tube GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
Zeleziarne Podbrezova a.s., Podbrezova, Slovaška, in njena povezana trgovca, tj. družbi Pipex Italia S.p.A., Arona, Italija, in Slavrur Sp. z o.o., Stalowa Wola, Poljska,
Dalmine SpA., Bergamo, Italy,
Vallourec Deutschland GmbH, Boulogne Billancourt, Francija;
Zeleziarne Podbrezova a.s., Podbrezova, Slovakia and its related traders Pipex Italia SpA., Arona, Italy and Slavrur Sp. z o.o., Stalowa Wola, Poland,
proizvajalec izvoznik v Ukrajini:
Vallourec Deutschland GmbH, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
skupina Interpipe (OJSC Interpipe NTRP, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukrajina, LLC Interpipe Niko Tube, Nikopol, Ukrajina) ter povezane trgovinske družbe (LLC Interpipe Ukraine, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukrajina, Interpipe Europe SA, Lugano, Švica, in Interpipe Central Trade GmbH, Frankfurt, Nemčija).
Exporting producer in Ukraine
Naknadni postopek
The Interpipe Group (OJSC Interpipe NTRP, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, LLC Interpipe Niko Tube, Nikopol, Ukraine) and their related trading companies LLC Interpipe Ukraine, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, Interpipe Europe SA, Lugano, Switzerland and Interpipe Central Trade GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany).
Komisija je 13. julija 2018 razkrila bistvena dejstva in premisleke, na podlagi katerih je nameravala uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla s poreklom iz Rusije in Ukrajine.
Subsequent procedure
Pripombe so predložili dve skupini ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, skupina Interpipe, misija Ukrajine pri Evropski uniji in stalna misija Ruske federacije pri Evropski uniji.
On 13 July 2018, the Commission disclosed the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloy steel, originating in Russia and Ukraine.
Službe Komisije so 8. avgusta 2018 zaslišale dve skupini ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in stalno misijo Ruske federacije pri Evropski uniji.
Comments were received from the two groups of Russian exporting producers, from Interpipe Group, from the Mission of Ukraine before the European Union and from the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union.
Istega dne je potekalo zaslišanje med skupino Interpipe in službami Komisije.
On 8 August 2018 a hearing took place between the two groups of Russian exporting producers and the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union and the Commission services.
Ob upoštevanju pripomb skupine Interpipe sta se družbi zagotovili dve dodatni razkritji glede analize v zvezi z Ukrajino in nekaterih vprašanj, povezanih z družbo.
On the same day, a hearing took place between Interpipe Group and the Commission services.
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani so se proučile in upoštevale, kot je bilo primerno.
In view of the comments made by Interpipe Group, the company was provided with two additional disclosures regarding the analysis with regard to Ukraine and certain company specific issues.
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot v zadnji preiskavi, na podlagi katere so bili uvedeni sedanji veljavni ukrepi, tj. nekatere brezšivne cevi iz železa ali jekla (v nadaljnjem besedilu: brezšivne cevi), s krožnim prečnim prerezom, z zunanjim premerom do vključno 406,4 mm in z ekvivalentom ogljika (CEV) do vključno 0,86 v skladu s formulo in kemično analizo Mednarodnega inštituta za varilstvo (IIW), s poreklom iz Rusije in Ukrajine (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek), ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex73041100, ex73041910, ex73041930, ex73042200, ex73042300, ex73042400, ex73042910, ex73042930, ex73043180, ex73043958, ex73043992, ex73043993, ex73045189, ex73045992 in ex73045993 (oznake TARIC 7304110010, 7304191020, 7304193020, 7304220020, 7304230020, 7304240020, 7304291020, 7304293020, 7304318030, 7304395830, 7304399230, 7304399320, 7304518930, 7304599230 in 7304599320).
Product concerned
Zadevni izdelek se uporablja v različne namene, na primer za cevovode za tekočine, v gradbeništvu za pilote, za mehansko uporabo, za plinovode, toplotne cevi ter cevi, znane kot cevi OCTG („oil country tubular goods“), ki se v naftni industriji uporabljajo kot vrtalne, zaščitne in proizvodne cevi.
The product concerned is the same as that in the last investigation which led to the imposition of measures currently in force, i.e. certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel (‘SPT’), of circular cross-section, of an external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm with a Carbon Equivalent Value (CEV) not exceeding 0,86 according to the International Institute of Welding (IIW) formula and chemical analysis, originating in Russia and Ukraine (‘the product concerned’), currently falling within CN codes ex73041100, ex73041910, ex73041930, ex73042200, ex73042300, ex73042400, ex73042910, ex73042930, ex73043180, ex73043958, ex73043992, ex73043993, ex73045189, ex73045992 and ex73045993 (TARIC codes 7304110010, 7304191020, 7304193020, 7304220020, 7304230020, 7304240020, 7304291020, 7304293020, 7304318030, 7304395830, 7304399230, 7304399320, 7304518930, 7304599230 and 7304599320)
Ob dobavi uporabnikom so brezšivne cevi zelo različnih oblik.
The product concerned is used in a wide variety of applications, like line pipes to transport liquids, in the construction business for piling, for mechanical uses, gas tubes, boiler tubes and oil and country tubular goods (‘OCTG’) for drilling, casing and tubing for the oil industry.
Brezšivne cevi so lahko pocinkane, navojne, dobavljene kot „green tubes“ (tj. niso toplotno obdelane), s posebnim zaključkom, z različnimi krožnimi prečnimi prerezi, razrezane ali nerazrezane.
SPT take very different forms at the time of their delivery to the users.
Ni splošnih standardnih velikosti cevi, zato je večina brezšivnih cevi izdelana po naročilu strank.
They can be e.g. galvanised, threaded, delivered as green tubes (i.e. without any heat treatment), with special ends, different cross-sections, cut to size or not.
Brezšivne cevi so običajno zvarjene.
There are no generalised standard sizes for the tubes, which explains why most of the SPT are made upon customers' order.
V posebnih primerih pa se lahko povežejo z navoji ali se uporabljajo nepovezane, vendar pa se lahko še vedno zvarijo.
SPT are normally connected by welding.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo vse brezšivne cevi enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter osnovno uporabo.
However, in particular cases they can be connected by their thread or be used alone, although they remain weldable.
Podobni izdelek
The investigation showed that all SPT share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa je potrdila, da imajo, kot je bilo ugotovljeno v prejšnjih in tudi zadnji preiskavi, izdelek, izvožen v Unijo iz Rusije in Ukrajine, izdelek, proizveden in prodan na domačih trgih Rusije in Ukrajine, ter izdelek, ki ga proizvajajo in prodajajo v Uniji proizvajalci Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter končne uporabe in se zato štejejo za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
As established in previous as well as in the latest investigation, this expiry review investigation confirmed that the product exported to the Union from Russia and Ukraine, the product produced and sold on the domestic markets of Russia and Ukraine, and the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union producers have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and end uses and are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping zaradi izteka veljavnih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
Rusija
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether dumping was likely to continue or recur upon an expiry of the measures in force.
Damping v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
Russia
Uvodne opombe
Dumping during the review investigation period
Komisija je v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping iz Rusije zaradi izteka obstoječih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
Preliminary remarks
Ker v preiskavi ni sodeloval noben ruski proizvajalec izvoznik, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 20, je splošna analiza Komisije, vključno z izračunom dampinga, temeljila na dostopnih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping from Russia.
Zato je bila verjetnost nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga ocenjena na podlagi informacij iz zahtevka za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa, ki so bile združene z informacijami iz drugih virov, kot so informacije, zbrane na podlagi člena 14(6) osnovne uredbe, informacije iz prejetih pisnih stališč, med drugim vključno s statističnimi podatki ruske zvezne carinske službe o ruskem izvozu, in statistični podatki s specializirane spletišču Metal Expert.
In the absence of cooperation by any Russian exporting producer, as indicated in recital (20), the Commission based its overall analysis, including the dumping calculation, on facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ker Rusija ni sodelovala, Komisija ni mogla primerjati normalne vrednosti z izvozno ceno po posameznih vrstah izdelka.
Consequently, the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping was assessed by using the information contained in the expiry review request, combined with other sources of information such as information collected on the basis of Article 14(6) of the basic Regulation, information contained in the written submissions received including, inter alia, Russian export statistics of the Russian Federal Customs Service (‘RFCS’), and statistical data from the specialist website Metal Expert.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena sta zato bili določeni na podlagi povprečnih vrednosti v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
The Russian non-cooperation made it impossible for the Commission to compare the normal value with the export price on a product type by product type basis.
Normalna vrednost
Therefore, both the normal value and the export price were established by using average values, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je za določanje normalne vrednosti uporabila isto metodologijo, kot jo je uporabil vložnik v zahtevku.
Normal value
Ta metodologija temelji na podatkih o ruskih domačih cenah, ki so na voljo na spletišču Metal Expert.
In order to establish normal value, the Commission used the same methodology as the one applied by the applicant in the request.
Komisija je zato uporabila povprečne domače cene v Rusiji, in sicer franko tovarna, kot je navedeno na spletišču Metal Expert za 12 mesecev od julija 2016 do junija 2017.
This methodology is based on the Russian domestic price data available on Metal Expert.
Izvozna cena
The Commission thus used average domestic prices in Russia, ex-works stated in Metal Expert for the 12 months from July 2016 to June 2017.
Izvozne cene v Unijo so bile ugotovljene na podlagi zbirke podatkov Komisije iz člena 14(6) osnovne uredbe.
Export prices to the Union were established on the basis of the Commission's 14(6) database.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena sta bili primerjani na podlagi franko tovarna.
Comparison
Normalna vrednost je bila prilagojena navzgor v skladu z metodologijo, ki jo je zagotovil vložnik, in na podlagi informacij, ki so na voljo na spletišču Metal Expert.
The normal value and the export price were compared on an ex-works basis.
Izvozna cena je prilagojena navzdol na raven franko tovarna.
Normal value was adjusted upwards following the methodology provided by the applicant and on the basis of the information available on the Metal Expert.
Za ta namen so bili stroški dostave, zavarovanje in provizija odšteti na podlagi informacij, ki so bile na voljo v zahtevku.
The export price was adjusted downwards to an ex-works level.
Damping
To this end, delivery costs, insurance and commission were deducted on the basis of information available in the request.
Na podlagi navedenega je Komisija izračunala, da stopnja dampinga za ruski izvoz v Unijo znaša približno 33 %.
Dumping
Raven uvoza v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom pa je bila razmeroma nizka, in sicer je predstavljala 0,6 % potrošnje Unije.
On the basis of the above, the Commission calculated a dumping margin for Russian exports to the Union of around 33 %.
Pripombe po dokončnem razkritju
The level of imports during the review investigation period was, however, relatively limited, representing 0,6 % of Union consumption.
Po razkritju sta dve skupini ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov skupaj predložili pripombe na dokument Komisije o splošnem razkritju.
Comments after final disclosure
Obe družbi sta oporekali zakonitosti obstoječih ukrepov.
After disclosure, the two groups of Russian exporting producers jointly submitted comments to the Commission's General Disclosure Document.
Prvič, trdili sta, da so bili prvotni ukrepi nezakoniti, saj je Komisija uporabila prilagajanje stroškov normalni vrednosti na podlagi člena 2(5) osnovne uredbe, kar naj bi bilo glede na sodno prakso pritožbenega organa STO nezakonito.
Both companies contested the legality of the existing measures.
Drugič, trdili sta, da je pristop Komisije k pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, pri katerem Komisija ne pride do ugotovitev, povezanih z družbo, v nasprotju z besedilom in duhom osnovne uredbe in protidampinškega sporazuma STO.
First, they claimed that the the original measures were illegal since the Commission had applied a cost adjustment to the normal value based on Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, which would, allegedly, be illegal under the WTO Appellate Body jurisprudence.
Prva trditev je bila zavrnjena, saj se nanaša na izračun prvotne dajatve, ki ne spada na področje uporabe tega postopka.
Secondly, they claimed that the Commission's approach in expiry reviews, whereby the Commission does not make company-specific findings, is contrary to the letter and spirit of the basic Regulation and the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement.
Za namene tega pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa je bilo treba zaradi nesodelovanja ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov uporabiti določbe člena 18.
The first claim was rejected since it refers to the calculation of the original duty which falls outside the scope of the current procedure.
Pri drugi trditvi dve skupini ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov nista utemeljili razlogov, zakaj bi bile ugotovitve na državni ravni v zvezi s pregledi zaradi izteka ukrepa nezakonite.
For the purpose of this expiry review, in the absence of cooperation of the Russian exporting producers, the provisions of Article 18 had to be used.
Ta trditev je bila zato prav tako zavrnjena.
On the second claim, the two groups of Russian exporting producers failed to substantiate the reasons as to why country-wide determinations in the context of expiry reviews would be illegal.
Kar zadeva posebne vidike preiskave, sta dve skupini ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov najprej oporekali temu, da je Komisija uporabila člen 18 osnovne uredbe, in trdili, da Komisija ni upoštevala informacij, ki sta jih predložili med preiskavo.
This claim was therefore also rejected.
V zvezi z uporabo člena 18 osnovne uredbe so bili vsi znani ruski proizvajalci izvozniki pozvani, naj izpolnijo vprašalnik, ki je bil po začetku namenjen proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
With regard to the specific aspects of the investigation, the two groups of Russian exporting producers first contested the Commission's application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation, and claimed that the Commission had disregarded information submitted by them in the course of the investigation.
Poleg tega je stalna misija Rusije pri EU prejela neizpolnjene vprašalnike in bila pozvana, naj se obrne na druge ruske proizvajalce (ali z njimi seznani Komisijo), s katerimi Komisija na dan začetka morda ni bila seznanjena, da bi ti imeli možnost sodelovati v preiskavi.
With regard to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation, all known Russian exporting producers were encouraged to fill in the questionnaire intended for exporting producers following initiation.
Dve skupini ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki sta se javili, sta 21. avgusta 2017 Komisijo obvestili o svoji odločitvi, da v preiskavi ne bosta polno sodelovali in da ne bosta izpolnili vprašalnika, svoje sodelovanje pa sta prostovoljno omejili na predložitev le nekaterih podatkov (kot so podatki o proizvodnji in zmogljivosti ter izvoznih cenah na tretjih trgih) in pripomb o nekaterih vidikih preiskave.