natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission, however, noted that had the increase in the conventional customs duty not been accounted for, the price increase found would have been higher.
Drugič, vložnik je tudi trdil, da prodaja na podlagi javnih razpisov ni nereprezentativna in bi jo bilo treba vključiti.
As either approach would not change the findings on the sufficient price increase, the Commission, left open the question whether the increase in the conventional customs duty should be considered for the price comparison in this case or not.
Komisija je pojasnila, da ta prodaja ni bila izključena iz primerjave cen (glej uvodno izjavo 26).
As for the exchange rate, the Applicant argued that the change in the exchange rate between EUR and INR should be taken into account.
Tretjič, vložnik je trdil, da bi moralo biti gibanje cen pri nadaljnji prodaji vsaj enakovredno stopnji uvedene dajatve, da bi se lahko štelo za občutno.
It argued that, as the INR value against the EUR increased, price competitiveness of Indian exports decreased.
Komisija je opozorila, da je ocena odvisna od primera in da zakonsko določen prag za ugotavljanje absorpcije ni odvisen od tega, ali je gibanje cen občutno, temveč od tega, ali ni bilo gibanja cen pri nadaljnji prodaji oziroma ali je bilo to gibanje nezadostno, tako da se je izničil učinek protidampinške dajatve.
The Commission considered that changes in currency exchange rates may be a factor to consider in situations where the invoicing is made in a foreign currency.
V tem primeru se po mnenju Komisije zvišanje cen za več kot 10 % ne more šteti za nezadostno.
However, in this case the comparison was made based on the resale price which was invoiced in EUR during both the OIP and the RIP so that the same currency was used to estimate the amount of price increase.
Četrtič, vložnik je Komisijo pozval, naj preveri izdelke, ki jih je družba Jindal Italia uvozila iz obrata družbe Jindal v Združenih arabskih emiratih ali od kje drugje, da bi potrdila, da ta uvoz po poreklu ni bil iz Indije ali da je bil sicer napačno razvrščen.
Therefore, any adjustments due to changes in the exchange rate between INR and EUR were not warranted and the request was rejected.
Komisija je opozorila, da se ta trditev nanaša predvsem na domnevo o izogibanju, kar ni predmet ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije.
Second, the Applicant also argued that tender sales are not unrepresentative and should be included.
Petič, vložnik je trdil, da bi morala Komisija ceno družbe Jindal Italia pri nadaljnji prodaji v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije primerjati ne le z njeno ceno v obdobju prvotne preiskave, ampak tudi s ceno njenih nekdanjih odvisnih družb v Španiji in Združenem kraljestvu pri nadaljnji prodaji v obdobju prvotne preiskave.
The Commission clarified that these sales were not excluded in the price comparison (see recital (26) above).
Trdil je, da bi bil ta pristop upravičen, saj se protidampinška dajatev nanaša na vso prodajo družbe Jindal.
Third, the Applicant argued that, to be considered significant, the movement in resale price should have been at least equivalent to the level of the duty imposed.
Komisija je menila, da taka primerjava ne bi bila primerna in ne bi dala smiselnih rezultatov, zlasti glede na različno ponudbo izdelkov, dobavne pogoje in valute računov.
The Commission noted that the assessment is case-specific and that the legal threshold for finding absorption is not whether the price movement is significant but rather whether there has been no or insufficient movement of the resale price thereby nullifying the effect of the anti-dumping duty.
Zato je trdila, da je ustrezno merilo le primerjava cen družbe Jindal Italia.
In this case the Commission found that a price increase of more than 10 % could not be considered insufficient.
Kljub temu je zaradi celovitosti pripravila simulacijo, pri kateri je primerjala ceno družbe Jindal Italia pri nadaljnji prodaji v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije s ceno vseh odvisnih družb družbe Jindal pri nadaljnji prodaji v obdobju prvotne preiskave.
Fourth, the Applicant asked the Commission to investigate the products imported by Jindal Italy from Jindal's plant in the United Arab Emirates or any other source to confirm that those imports were not originating in India or had otherwise been misclassified.
Simulacija je pokazala, da bi se cena pri nadaljnji prodaji med obdobjem ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije in obdobjem prvotne preiskave v povprečju še zvišala (za [več kot 13 %]).
The Commission noted that this claim rather refers to an allegation of circumvention, which is not the subject matter of an absorption reinvestigation.
Zato bi taka analiza kljub temu, da ima le omejen pomen, le podprla sklep Komisije v tej ponovni preiskavi.
Fifth, the Applicant submitted that the Commission should have compared not only the resale price of Jindal Italy in the RIP with that of Jindal Italy in the OIP, but also with the resale price of Jindal's former subsidiaries in Spain and the UK in the OIP.
Nazadnje je vložnik zastavil vprašanje glede neposredne prodaje družbe Jindal v Unijo.
The Applicant argued that this approach would be warranted since the anti-dumping duty relates to all sales of Jindal.
Komisija je ugotovila, da se obseg prodaje ne more šteti za pomembnega ([manj kot 300 ton]) in da prodaja poteka večinoma pod drugačnimi pogoji dobave kot v prvotni preiskavi.
The Commission considered that such a comparison would not be appropriate and would not render meaningful results given notably the different product mix, delivery terms and invoice currencies.
Zato smiselne primerjave ni bilo mogoče izvesti.
It thus maintained that a price comparison on Jindal Italy sales only was the adequate benchmark.
Ta prodaja je bila tako izključena iz primerjave cen.
Nonetheless, for the sake of completeness, the Commission made a simulation in which it compared Jindal Italy's resale price in the RIP with the resale price of all Jindal subsidiaries in the OIP.
Sklepna ugotovitev
That simulation showed that the resale price on average would have further increased (by [more than 13 %]) between the RIP and the OIP.
Zaradi omejenega obsega in pomanjkanja primerljivosti Komisija za družbo Jindal ni mogla pripraviti dokončne in podrobne analize cen.
Therefore, such an analysis, despite its limited relevance, would have reinforced the conclusion of the Commission in this reinvestigation.
Kljub temu je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 25, ugotovila, da se je cena družbe Jindal Italia pri nadaljnji prodaji na splošno zvišala v primerjavi z obdobjem prvotne preiskave, zato so ukrepi privedli do pozitivnega gibanja cen v obsegu, primerljivem z zadevno dajatvijo.
Finally, the Applicant asked about the direct sales to the Union of Jindal.
Poleg tega je zaradi znatnega zmanjšanja obsega ugotovila, da učinek ukrepov ni bil ogrožen.
The Commission noted that the volumes could not be considered significant ([less than 300 tonnes]) and were mainly sold on different delivery terms than in the original investigation.
Zaradi nesodelovanja in zanemarljivega obsega prodaje ([manj kot 0,1 %] potrošnje Unije) s strani drugih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so predmet te ponovne preiskave, je Komisija menila, da zgornje ugotovitve veljajo tudi za „vse druge družbe“.
Therefore, a meaningful comparison could not be carried out.
V zvezi s tem je ugotovila, da se razpoložljivi statistični podatki za „vse druge družbe“ zaradi majhnega obsega in pomanjkanja informacij o prodajnih kanalih s strani drugih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so predmet te ponovne preiskave, ne morejo šteti za pomembne.
Consequently, those sales were excluded from the price comparison.
Kljub temu je opozorila, da so podatki o ceni zanemarljivega obsega prodaje, zbrani v skladu z zbirko statističnih podatkov o uvozu iz člena 14(6) osnovne uredbe, pokazali povprečno ceno za „vse druge družbe“, ki je bila podobna povprečni ceni družbe Jindal.
Conclusion
Zato je Komisa menila, da so ukrepi imeli učinek v zvezi z družbo Jindal in „vsemi drugimi družbami“ iz člena 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/388.
In view of the limited volumes and lack of comparability, the Commission could not conduct a conclusive and detailed price analysis for Jindal.
Glede na te ugotovitve je Komisija menila, da ni treba ponovno izračunati dajatve.
Nonetheless, as mentioned in recital (25), the Commission found that, overall, Jindal Italy's resale price increased in comparison with the OIP, and, therefore, the measures led to a positive movement in prices in similar measure to the duty concerned.
RAZKRITJE IN SKLEP
In addition, given the significant decrease in volumes, the Commission found that the effect of the measures was not undermined.
Kot je navedeno v oddelku 1.9, je Komisija vse zainteresirane strani obvestila o osnovnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala zaključiti ponovno preiskavo za ugotavljanje absorpcije.
In the absence of cooperation and in view of the negligible volumes ([less than 0,1 %] of Union consumption) sold by other Indian exporting producers subject to this reinvestigation, the Commission considered that the above findings also apply to ‘All other companies’.
Pripombe so bile analizirane in upoštevane, če je bilo to upravičeno.
In this respect the Commission observed that the available statistical data for ‘All other companies’ could not be considered meaningful in view of the low volumes and the absence of information on sales channels by other Indian exporting producers subject to this reinvestigation.
Iz zgornjih razlogov je Komisija sklenila, da je treba ponovno preiskavo za ugotavljanje absorpcije zaključiti brez spremembe veljavnih ukrepov.
Nonetheless, as an indication the Commission noted that the price data of the negligible sales volume, collected pursuant to the import statistics database set out in Article 14(6) of the basic Regulation, showed an average price for ‘All other companies’ that was similar to the average price of Jindal.
Ta uredba je v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 –
Therefore, the Commission considered that the measures have had an effect in relation to Jindal and ‘All other companies’ referred to in Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
In view of these findings, the Commission did not consider it necessary to proceed with a recalculation of the duty.
Člen 1
DISCLOSURE AND CONCLUSION
Ponovna preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije v zvezi z uvozom cevi iz nodularnega litega železa (imenovanega tudi sferoidno grafitno lito železo) s poreklom iz Indije v skladu s členom 12 Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 se zaključi brez spremembe veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
As set out in section 1.9 above, the Commission informed all interested parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to terminate the absorption reinvestigation.
Člen 2
Comments were analysed and taken into consideration where warranted.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
For the reasons stated above, the Commission concluded that the absorption reinvestigation should be terminated without amending the measures in force.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
This Regulation is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.
V Bruslju, 22. januarja 2019
The absorption reinvestigation concerning imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India pursuant to Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 is hereby terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
Article 2
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/388 z dne 17. marca 2016 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz cevi iz nodularnega litega železa (imenovanega tudi sferoidno grafitno lito železo) s poreklom iz Indije (UL L 73, 18.3.2016, str. 53).
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1369 z dne 11. avgusta 2016 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/388 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz cevi iz nodularnega litega železa (imenovanega tudi sferoidno grafitno lito železo) s poreklom iz Indije (UL L 217, 12.8.2016, str. 4).
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/387 z dne 17. marca 2016 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz cevi iz nodularnega litega železa (imenovanega tudi sferoidno grafitno lito železo) s poreklom iz Indije (UL L 73, 18.3.2016, str. 1).
Done at Brussels, 22 January 2019.
UL C 151, 30.4.2018, str. 57.
For the Commission
Obdobje ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije je potekalo od 1. aprila 2017 do 31. marca 2018.
The President
Zadevno obdobje je potekalo od 1. aprila 2016 do 31. marca 2018.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
Obdobje prvotne preiskave je potekalo od 1. oktobra 2013 do 30. septembra 2014.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388 of 17 March 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India (OJ L 73, 18.3.2016, p. 53).
V vsakem primeru ugotovitve te preiskave kažejo, da je družba Jindal Italia svoje cene zvišala nad stopnjo izravnalne dajatve, uvedene leta 2016.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1369 of 11 August 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India (OJ L 217, 12.8.2016, p. 4).
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/387 of 17 March 2016 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India (OJ L 73, 18.3.2016, p. 1).
Komisija je potrdila, da je bila dajatev že upoštevana pri analizi, ki je bila razkrita zainteresiranim stranem, vendar je opozorila, da bi bilo zvišanje cen večje, če se zvišanja konvencionalne carine ne bi upoštevalo.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/103
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2019/103
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1998 as regards clarification, harmonisation and simplification as well as strengthening of certain specific aviation security measures
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/1998 glede pojasnitve, uskladitve in poenostavitve ter okrepitve nekaterih posebnih ukrepov za varovanje letalstva
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002, and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2008 o skupnih pravilih na področju varovanja civilnega letalstva in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002 ter zlasti člena 4(3) Uredbe,
Experience gained with the implementation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1998 has shown the need for minor amendments to the implementing modalities of certain common basic standards.
Izkušnje, pridobljene z izvajanjem Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/1998, so pokazale potrebo po manjših spremembah načinov izvajanja nekaterih skupnih osnovnih standardov.
Certain specific aviation security measures should be clarified, harmonised or simplified in order to improve legal clarity, standardize the common interpretation of the legislation and further ensure the best implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security.
Nekatere posebne ukrepe za varovanje letalstva bi bilo treba pojasniti, uskladiti ali poenostaviti, da bi se izboljšala pravna jasnost, standardizirala skupna razlaga zakonodaje in dodatno zagotovilo najboljše izvajanje skupnih osnovnih standardov za varovanje letalstva.
Furthermore, new developments in terms of airport and airline operations, technology and security equipment addressing the changes in the threat and risk picture, as well as the evolution of international Standards and Recommended Practices of International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) require the implementing rules to be amended accordingly.
Poleg tega je treba zaradi novega razvoja v smislu operacij letališč in letalskih prevoznikov, tehnologije in varnostne opreme, ki obravnava spremenjene grožnje in tveganja, pa tudi zaradi razvoja mednarodnih standardov in priporočenih praks Mednarodne organizacije civilnega letalstva ustrezno spremeniti izvedbena pravila.
The amendments concern measures in the areas of airport security, the revision of the rules on background check in order to enhance security culture and resilience, and the introduction, definition of performance standards and use of Shoe Explosive Detection equipment (SED) and Explosive Vapour Detection equipment (EVD).
Spremembe se nanašajo na ukrepe na področju varovanja letališča, revizijo pravil o preverjanju preteklosti za okrepitev kulture varnosti in odpornosti ter uvedbo detektorjev eksplozivov za čevlje in detektorjev eksplozivnih hlapov, opredelitvijo standardov učinkovitosti zanje ter njihovo uporabo.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 –
However, points 2, 20, 25, 26, 28 to 38, 44 and 45 of the Annex to this Regulation shall apply from 31 December 2020.
V Bruslju, 23. januarja 2019
Done at Brussels, 23 January 2019.
Predsednik
For the Commission
UL L 97, 9.4.2008, str. 72.
The President
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1998 z dne 5. novembra 2015 o določitvi podrobnih ukrepov za izvajanje skupnih osnovnih standardov za varovanje letalstva (UL L 299, 14.11.2015, str. 1).
OJ L 97, 9.4.2008, p. 72.
PRILOGA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1998 of 5 November 2015 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security (OJ L 299, 14.11.2015, p. 1).
Priloga k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) 2015/1998 se spremeni:
ANNEX
točka 1.1.3.4 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point 1.1.3.4 is replaced by the following:
Čim prej se izvede varnostni pregled kritičnih delov, ki bi lahko bili kontaminirani, da se tako ustrezno zagotovi, da na njih ni prepovedanih predmetov, kadar koli so imeli dostop do kritičnih delov:
‘1.1.3.4
varnostno nepregledane osebe;
A security search of those critical parts that could have been contaminated shall be carried out as soon as possible in order to reasonably ensure that they do not contain prohibited articles, wherever access to critical parts has occurred by any of the following:
potniki in člani posadke, ki prihajajo iz tretjih držav, ki niso naštete v Dodatku 4-B;
unscreened persons;
potniki in člani posadke, ki prihajajo z letališč Unije, na katerih zadevna država članica odstopa od skupnih osnovnih standardov, kot je določeno v členu 1 Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1254/2009, razen če so ob prihodu pričakani in pospremljeni izven teh območij v skladu s točko 1.2.7.3.
passengers and crew members arriving from third countries other than those listed in Attachment 4-B;
Ta točka se šteje za izpolnjeno pri zrakoplovih, ki so podvrženi varnostni preiskavi zrakoplova, in se ne uporablja, kadar so imele dostop do kritičnih delov osebe, ki jih zajemata točki 1.3.2 in 4.1.1.7.
passengers and crew members arriving from Union airports where the relevant Member State has derogated from the common basic standards as provided for in Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1254/2009, unless they are met upon their arrival and escorted outside those areas in accordance with point 1.2.7.3.
V zvezi s točkama (b) in (c) se ta določba uporablja samo za tiste kritične dele, ki se uporabljajo za varnostno pregledano oddano prtljago in/ali varnostno pregledane odhajajoče potnike, ki ne odhajajo na istem zrakoplovu kot ti potniki in člani posadke.
This point shall be considered to be met for aircrafts that are subject to an aircraft security search, and it shall not apply when persons covered by point 1.3.2 and point 4.1.1.7 have had access to critical parts.
točka 1.2.3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
As far as points (b) and (c) are concerned, this provision shall only apply to those critical parts that are used by screened hold baggage and/or screened departing passengers not departing on the same aircraft as these passengers and crew members.
„1.2.3
Point 1.2.3 is replaced by the following:
Zahteve za identifikacijske priponke Unije za člane posadke in za letališče
‘1.2.3
Identifikacijska priponka člana posadke, zaposlenega pri letalskem prevozniku Unije, in identifikacijska priponka za letališče se lahko izdata samo osebi, ki ima operativno potrebo in je uspešno opravila temeljito preverjanje preteklosti v skladu s točko 11.1.3.
Requirements for Union crew identification cards and airport identification cards
Identifikacijske priponke za člane posadke in za letališče se izdajajo za največ pet let.
A crew identification card of a crew member employed by a Union air carrier and an airport identification card may only be issued to a person who has an operational need and has successfully completed an enhanced background check in accordance with point 11.1.3.
Identifikacijska priponka osebe, ki temeljitega preverjanja preteklosti ne opravi uspešno, se nemudoma onemogoči ali prekliče, kot je primerno, ter vrne pristojnemu organu, upravljavcu ali izdajatelju, kot je ustrezno.
Crew and airport identification cards shall be issued for a period not exceeding five years.
Identifikacijska priponka se nosi na vidnem mestu vsaj takrat, kadar se imetnik nahaja na varnostnih območjih omejenega gibanja.
The identification card of a person who fails an enhanced background check shall be immediately disabled or withdrawn, as applicable, and returned to the competent authority, operator or issuing entity, as appropriate.
Osebe, pristojne za izvajanje točke 1.5.1(c), opozorijo in po potrebi prijavijo osebo, ki ne nosi identifikacijske priponke na varnostnih območjih omejenega gibanja, razen na tistih območjih, kjer so prisotni potniki.
The identification card shall be worn in a visible place at least whenever the holder is in security restricted areas.
Identifikacijska priponka se nemudoma vrne v naslednjih primerih:
A person who is not displaying his identification card in security restricted areas other than those areas where passengers are present shall be challenged by persons responsible for the implementation of point 1.5.1(c) and, as appropriate, be reported.
na zahtevo pristojnega organa, upravljavca ali izdajatelja, kot je ustrezno:
The identification card shall be returned immediately in the following circumstances:
ob prenehanju delovnega razmerja;
upon request of the competent authority, operator or issuing entity as appropriate;
ob spremembi delodajalca;
upon termination of employment;
ob spremembi potrebe po dostopu na območja, za katera je bilo pooblastilo dano;
upon change of employer;
ob poteku veljavnosti priponke;
upon change of the need to have access to areas for which an authorisation has been given;
ob odvzemu priponke.
upon expiry of the card;
Izdajatelja se nemudoma uradno obvesti o izgubi, kraji ali nevrnitvi identifikacijske priponke.
upon withdrawal of the card.
Elektronska priponka se po vrnitvi, poteku veljavnosti, odvzemu ali obvestilu o izgubi, kraji ali nevrnitvi nemudoma onemogoči.“;
The issuing entity shall be notified immediately of the loss, theft or failure to return an identification card.
točka 1.2.6.3(b) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
An electronic card shall be immediately disabled following return, expiry, withdrawal or notification of loss, theft or failure to return.’;
vezana na družbo ali posameznega registriranega uporabnika vozila prek varne baze podatkov o registraciji vozil.“;
Point 1.2.6.3(b) is replaced by the following:
v točki 1.2.6.3 se zadnji stavek nadomesti z naslednjim: