natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tartaric acid originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz vinske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union prior to its amendment by Regulation (EU) 2017/2321 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije, preden je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (EU) 2017/2321 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 11(2) Uredbe,
In 2006, the Council imposed, by means of Regulation (EC) No 130/2006, a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tartaric acid originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’, China or ‘the country concerned’) (‘the original measures’).
Svet je leta 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 130/2006 uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz vinske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK, Kitajska ali zadevna država) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotni ukrepi).
These measures took the form of individual duty rates ranging from 0 % to 10,1 % for three Chinese exporting producers which received market economy treatment (‘MET’) and 34,9 % for all other Chinese exporting producers.
Ti ukrepi so bili v obliki individualnih stopenj dajatve, ki segajo od 0 % do 10,1 % za tri kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so prejeli tržnogospodarsko obravnavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: TGO), in 34,9 % za vse druge kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike.
By Council Regulation (EC) No 150/2008, following an interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the original measures were amended and the product definition was clarified.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 150/2008 so bili po vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe spremenjeni prvotni ukrepi in pojasnjena je bila opredelitev izdelka.
In April 2012, by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 332/2012, following the publication of the Beef and Rice WTO Appellate Body report, the Council excluded exports from Hangzhou Bioking Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd (‘Hangzhou Bioking’), an exporting producer benefitting from a 0 % duty rate, from the scope of the measures.
Svet je aprila 2012 z Izvedbeno Uredbo (EU) št. 332/2012 po objavi poročila pritožbenega organa STO za govedino in riž izključil izvoz iz družbe Hangzhou Bioking Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Hangzhou Bioking), proizvajalca izvoznika, upravičenega do 0-odstotne stopnje dajatev, iz okvira ukrepov.
In April 2012, following an expiry review in accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council extended the measures for a further five years by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 349/2012 (‘previous expiry review’).
Aprila 2012 je Svet po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne Uredbe podaljšal ukrepe za dodatno petletno obdobje z Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 349/2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prejšnji pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa).
In July 2012, following a partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, by means of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 626/2012, the original measures were amended.
Julija 2012 so bili po delnem vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 626/2012 spremenjeni prvotni ukrepi.
The Council withdrew MET for the remaining two companies, Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd (‘Changmao Biochemical’) and Ninghai Organic Chemical Factory (‘Ninghai Organic’), and established an individual anti-dumping margin in respect of these companies, respectively 13,1 % and 8,3 %, by using their own export prices
Svet je umaknil TGO za preostali dve družbi, Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Changmao Biochemical) in Ninghai Organic Chemical Factory (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Ninghai Organic) ter zanju na podlagi njunih lastnih izvoznih cen določil individualno protidampinško stopnjo 13,1 % oziroma 8,3 %.
An anti-dumping investigation initiated on 4 December 2014 with regard to imports into the Union of tartaric acid originating in the PRC, limited to Hangzhou Bioking on the basis of Article 5 of the basic Regulation, was terminated by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/176 without imposing measures.
Protidampinška preiskava, začeta 4. decembra 2014 glede uvoza vinske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske v Unijo, na podlagi člena 5 osnovne uredbe omejena na družbo Hangzhou Bioking, je bila z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije (EU) 2016/176 zaključena brez uvedbe ukrepov.
By its judgment of 1 June 2017 in Case T-442/12 Changmao Biochemical Engineering v Council, the General Court annulled Regulation (EU) No 626/2012 in so far as that regulation applies to Changmao Biochemical.
S sodbo z dne 1. junija 2017 v zadevi T-442/12, Changmao Biochemical Engineering proti Svetu, je Splošno sodišče razveljavilo Uredbo (EU) št. 626/2012 v delu, v katerem se ta uporablja za družbo Changmao Biochemical.
On 7 September 2017, the Commission published a Notice in the Official Journal of the European Union concerning the judgment of 1 June 2017 in case T-442/12.
Komisija je 7. septembra 2017 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavila obvestilo o sodbi z dne 1. junija 2017 v zadevi T-442/12.
The Commission decided to reopen the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of tartaric acid originating in the PRC that led to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 626/2012, in so far as it concerns the exporting producer concerned, and resumed it at the point at which the irregularity occurred.
Komisija je sklenila ponovno odpreti protidampinško preiskavo v zvezi z uvozom vinske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki je privedla do sprejetja Uredbe (EU) št. 626/2012, kolikor se ta nanaša na zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika, in jo nadaljevati na točki, kjer je prišlo do nepravilnosti.
That reopening was limited in scope to the implementation of the judgment of the General Court with regard to Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd.
Ponovno odprtje je bilo v obsegu omejeno na uveljavitev sodbe Splošnega sodišča glede družbe Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd.
The reopening did not affect other investigations.
Ponovno odprtje ni vplivalo na druge preiskave.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry, the Commission received a request for review pursuant Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation (‘request for review’).
Po objavi obvestila o bližajočem se izteku ukrepa je Komisija prejela zahtevek za pregled na podlagi člena 11(2) osnovne uredbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zahtevek za pregled).
The request for review was lodged on 24 January 2017 by Distillerie Bonollo S.r.l., Caviro Distillerie S.r.l., Industria Chimica Valenzana SpA, Alvinesa Alcoholera Vinícola SA, and Comercial Química Sarasa SL (‘the applicants’), representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of tartaric acid.
Zahtevek za pregled so 24. januarja 2017 vložila podjetja Distillerie Bonollo S.r.l., Caviro Distillerie S.r.l., Industria Chimica Valenzana S.p.a., Alvinesa Alcoholera Vinícola SA in Comercial Química Sarasa SL (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vložniki), ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje vinske kisline v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures imposed on imports of tartaric acid originating in China would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and continuation or recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi se zaradi izteka ukrepov, uvedenih na uvoz vinske kisline s poreklom iz Kitajske, damping in škoda za industrijo Unije verjetno nadaljevala ali ponovila.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 19 April 2017 the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (‘Notice of initiation’).
Komisija je po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom iz člena 15(1) osnovne uredbe ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, in je 19. aprila 2017 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku), napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava glede verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2016 do 31. decembra 2016 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ali OPP).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajemalo obdobje od 1. januarja 2013 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
The Commission officially advised the applicants, other known Union producers, exporting producers, importers, users in the Union known to be concerned and the representatives of the exporting country concerned of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila vložnike, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, uporabnike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in predstavnike zadevne države izvoznice.
In its Notice of initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample interested parties in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo morda izvedla vzorčenje zainteresiranih strani v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In view of the apparent large number of exporting producers from China, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of initiation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Kitajske je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known exporting producers to come forward within 15 days of the publication of the Notice of initiation and to provide it with the information requested in this notice.
Da bi se lahko Komisija odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse znane proizvajalce izvoznike pozvala, naj se v 15 dneh po objavi obvestila o začetku javijo in ji predložijo informacije, zahtevane v tem obvestilu.
The information requested included production volume and production capacity.
Zahtevane informacije so vključevale obseg proizvodnje in proizvodno zmogljivost.
In addition, the Commission invited the Mission of the PRC to the European Union to appoint a representative who could cooperate with the Commission in the selection of the sample.
Poleg tega je predstavništvo LRK pri Evropski uniji pozvala, naj imenuje predstavnika, ki bi lahko sodeloval s Komisijo pri izboru vzorca.
None of the 22 Chinese exporter/producers that were contacted or any other Chinese exporter/producer came forward and provided the information requested.
Nobeden od 22 kitajskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev, s katerimi je bil navezan stik, niti kateri koli drug kitajski izvoznik/proizvajalec se ni javil, da bi zagotovil zahtevane informacije.
Prior to initiation, the Commission contacted the Union producers and associations of Union producers identified in the application for review in view of verifying whether the Union producers presenting the application were sufficiently representative.
Pred začetkom je Komisija stopila v stik s proizvajalci Unije in združenji proizvajalcev Unije, opredeljenimi v prošnji za pregled, da bi preverila, ali so proizvajalci Unije, ki vlagajo prošnjo, dovolj reprezentativni.
In accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, the Commission provisionally selected a sample of six Union producers having the largest sales volumes in the Union during the period of 1 January to 31 December 2016.
Zainteresirane strani so bile pozvane, naj predložijo pripombe glede začasnega vzorca.
These six companies represented 86 % of the total Union industry's sales volume of TA.
En proizvajalec Unije, ki ni bil vključen v začasni vzorec, je trdil, da bi moral biti vključen v končni vzorec, da bi se tako bolje prikazal položaj industrije Unije.
Interested parties were invited to comment on the provisional sample.
To družbo je podprlo italijansko trgovinsko združenje proizvajalcev vinske kisline v Uniji.
One Union producer which was not included in the provisional sample claimed that it should be included in the final sample in order to give a better picture of the situation of the Union industry.
Drug proizvajalec Unije je navedel, da ne želi sodelovati v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa.
This company was supported by the Italian trade association of Union producers of TA.
Predložena ni bila nobena dodatna pripomba.
Another Union producer stated that it did not wish to participate in the expiry review.
Komisija je glede na prejete pripombe menila, da vzorčenje proizvajalcev Unije ni bilo več primerno.
No further comments were submitted.
Vzorčenje nepovezanih uvoznikov
The Commission considered that in light of the comments received sampling of Union producers was no longer appropriate.
Da bi se sprejela odločitev, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko bil izbran vzorec, so bili vsi nepovezani uvozniki pozvani, naj sodelujejo v tej preiskavi.
Sampling of unrelated importers
Strani so bile pozvane, naj se javijo in Komisiji zagotovijo informacije, zahtevane v Prilogi II k obvestilu o začetku.
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all unrelated importers were invited to participate in this investigation.
Poleg tega je Komisija v začetni fazi stopila v stik z desetimi uvozniki, opredeljenimi v zahtevku, in jih pozvala, naj pojasnijo svojo dejavnost in izpolnijo Prilogo II obvestila o začetku.
Those parties were requested to make themselves known by providing the Commission with the information requested in Annex II of the Notice of initiation.
Na obrazec za vzorčenje nepovezanih uvoznikov se je odzvalo pet družb.
In addition, 10 importers identified in the request were contacted by the Commission at initiation stage and were invited to explain their activity and to fill in Annex II of the Notice of initiation.
Vendar jih ni bilo mogoče opredeliti kot uvoznike izdelka, ki se pregleduje, temveč so se šteli za uporabnike.
Five companies replied to the sampling form for unrelated importers.
Vprašalniki
However they did not qualify as importers of the product under review but were considered as users.
Komisija je vsem devetim proizvajalcem Unije in šestim uporabnikom poslala vprašalnike.
Questionnaires
Vprašalniki so bili hkrati poslani desetim proizvajalcem v možnih tretjih državah s tržnim gospodarstvom, in sicer v Argentini, Avstraliji, Braziliji, Čilu in Indiji.
The Commission sent the questionnaires to all nine Union producers and six users.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je poslalo sedem proizvajalcev Unije, štirje uporabniki iz Unije in en proizvajalec iz Avstralije kot možne tretje države s tržnim gospodarstvom.
Questionnaires were also sent to 10 producers in potential market economy third countries namely in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile and India.
Sodeloval ni nobeden od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Questionnaire replies were received from seven Union producers, four users in the Union and one producer in the potential market economy third country Australia.
Preveritveni obiski
None of the Chinese exporting producers cooperated.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode ter za oceno, ali bi bila uvedba ukrepov v nasprotju z interesom Unije.
Verification visits
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih družb:
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for a determination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury and for assessing whether the imposition of measures would be against the Union interest.
proizvajalci Unije:
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Alvinesa Alcoholera Vinícola SA, Daimiel, Španija
Union producers:
Caviro Distillerie S.r.l., Faenza, Italija
Alvinesa Alcoholera Vinícola SA, Daimiel, Spain
Comercial Química Sarasa S.L., Girona, Španija
Caviro Distillerie S.r.l., Faenza, Italy
Distillerie Bonollo S.p.A, Formigine, Italija
Comercial Química Sarasa S.L., Girona, Spain
Giovanni Randi S.p.a, Faenza, Italija
Distillerie Bonollo SpA, Formigine, Italy
ICV - Industria Chimica Valenzana S.p.A, Padova, Italija
Giovanni Randi SpA, Faenza, Italy
Villapana S.p.A, Faenza, Italija
ICV — Industria Chimica Valenzana SpA, Padova, Italy
uporabniki:
Villapana SpA, Faenza, Italy
DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS, København, Danska
Users:
Saint-Gobain Construction Products UK Ltd, Leicestershire, Združeno kraljestvo
DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark
B. IZDELEK, KI SE PREGLEDUJE, IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
Saint-Gobain Construction Products UK Ltd, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje
B. PRODUCT UNDER REVIEW AND LIKE PRODUCT
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je vinska kislina, razen vinske kisline D-(-)- z negativno optično rotacijo vsaj 12,0 stopinj, ki se meri v raztopini vode v skladu z metodo, opisano v evropski farmakopeji, s poreklom iz LRK, trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN ex29181200 (oznaka TARIC 2918120090) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: izdelek, ki se pregleduje).
Product under review
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, se uporablja v vinu, pijačah in aditivih za živila, kot zaviralno sredstvo v mavcu in številnih drugih izdelkih.
The product under review is tartaric acid, excluding D-(-)- tartaric acid with a negative optical rotation of at least 12,0 degrees, measured in a water solution according to the method described in the European Pharmacopoeia, originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN code ex29181200 (TARIC code 2918120090) (‘the product under review’).
Pridobiva se lahko iz stranskih proizvodov pri proizvodnji vina, kot velja za proizvodnjo v Uniji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: naravna proizvodnja), ali s kemično sintezo iz petrokemičnih spojin, kot velja za proizvodnjo v LRK (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sintetična proizvodnja).
The product under review is used in wine, in beverage and food additives, as a retardant in plaster and in numerous other products.
Samo vinska kislina L+ se pridobiva iz stranskih proizvodov pri proizvodnji vina.
It can be obtained either from the by-products of winemaking, as is the case with production in the Union (‘natural production’) or via chemical synthesis from petrochemical compounds, as is the case with production in the PRC (‘synthetic production’).
Sintetična proizvodnja omogoča pridobivanje vinske kisline L+ in DL.
Only L+ tartaric acid is manufactured from the by-products of winemaking.
Obe vrsti sta izdelek, ki se pregleduje, njuna uporaba pa se prekriva.
Synthetic production allows the manufacture of both L+ and DL tartaric acid.
Podobni izdelek
Both types are the product under review and have overlapping uses.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da imajo izdelek, ki se pregleduje in je izdelan v LRK ter se izvaža v Unijo:
It was considered that the product under review produced in the PRC and exported to the Union:
izdelek, izdelan in prodajan v primerljivi državi,
the product produced and sold by the exporting producers on the domestic market of the PRC,
ter izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije,
the product produced and sold in the analogue country,
enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe.
the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry,
Zato se štejejo za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics, and the same basic uses.
C. VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA DAMPINGA
They were therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Uvodne pripombe
C. LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OF DUMPING
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi iztek obstoječih ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga.
Preliminary remarks
Izvoz družbe Hangzhou Bioking je bil izključen iz analize verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 332/2012, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 2.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
Spodnja analiza je temeljila zgolj na izvozu izdelka, ki se pregleduje, s strani izvoznikov/proizvajalcev, za katere veljajo ukrepi.
Exports by Hangzhou Bioking were excluded from the analysis of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping pursuant to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 332/2012 mentioned in recital (2).
Kot je navedeno zgoraj v uvodni izjavi 27, v preiskavi ni sodeloval noben kitajski izvoznik/proizvajalec.
The analysis below was solely based on exports of the product under review by exporters/producers subject to the measures.
Zato je Komisija kitajske organe obvestila, da bi lahko zaradi nesodelovanja kitajskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev uporabila člen 18 osnovne uredbe za ugotovitve glede LRK.
As mentioned above in recital (27), none of the Chinese exporters/producers cooperated in the investigation.
Komisija v zvezi s tem od kitajskih organov ni prejela nobenih pripomb ali zahtevkov za posredovanje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje.
Therefore, the Commission informed the Chinese authorities that due to the absence of cooperation of any Chinese exporter/producer, the Commission may apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation concerning the findings with regard to the PRC.
Na podlagi tega in v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe so ugotovitve v zvezi z obstojem dampinga in verjetnostjo nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga temeljile na razpoložljivih dejstvih, zlasti na:
On this basis, in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, the findings in relation to the existence of dumping and the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping were based on facts available, in particular:
podatkih, ki so jih države članice sporočile Komisiji v skladu s členom 14(6) osnovne uredbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zbirka podatkov iz člena 14(6));
information contained in the request;
statistiki kitajske zbirke statističnih podatkov o izvozu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: kitajska zbirka podatkov);
data reported to the Commission by the Member States pursuant to Article 14(6) of the basic Regulation (the ‘14(6) database’);
zbirki podatkov Global Trade Atlas (v nadaljnjem besedilu: GTA);
statistics of the Chinese Export Statistics Database (‘Chinese database’);
javno dostopnih informacijah, kot so poslovna spletna mesta in izvlečki objav družb za raziskave trga, dostopnih na spletu;
Global Trade Atlas (‘GTA’) database;
informacijah, zbranih med prejšnjimi preiskavami.
publicly available information such as corporate websites and excerpts of publications from market intelligence firms available on internet;
Damping