natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This does not preclude Member States from including, in the designation process, specific conditions justified on grounds of efficiency, including grouping geographical areas or components or setting minimum periods for the designation.
Da se zagotovi stabilnost in podpre postopen prenos, bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da na svojem ozemlju še naprej skrbijo za zagotavljanje univerzalnih storitev, ki niso storitev ustreznega širokopasovnega dostopa do interneta in govorna komunikacijska storitev na fiksni lokaciji ter so na dan začetka veljavnosti te direktive vključene v obseg obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve na podlagi Direktive 2002/22/ES, če storitve ali primerljive storitve niso na voljo pod normalnimi komercialnimi pogoji.
The costs of ensuring the availability of a connection capable of delivering an adequate broadband internet access service as identified in accordance with this Directive and voice communications services at a fixed location at an affordable price within the universal service obligations should be estimated, in particular by assessing the expected financial burden for providers and users in the electronic communications sector.
Omogočanje nadaljnjega zagotavljanja javnih telefonskih govorilnic za širšo javnost z uporabo kovancev, kreditnih ali bančnih plačilnih kartic ali predplačilnih kartic, vključno s karticami za uporabo z izbiralnimi kodami, imenikov in imeniških storitev v okviru režima univerzalne storitve, kakor dolgo se kaže potreba, bi državam članicam omogočilo potrebno prožnost, da ustrezno upoštevajo spremenljive nacionalne okoliščine.
A priori, requirements to ensure nation-wide territorial coverage imposed in the designation procedure are likely to exclude or dissuade certain undertakings from applying for being designated as universal service providers.
To lahko vključuje zagotavljanje javnih telefonskih govorilnic na glavnih vstopnih točkah države, kot so letališča ali železniške in avtobusne postaje, ter na mestih, kjer se ljudje zadržujejo v nujnih primerih, kot so bolnišnice, policijske postaje in mesta za nujno ustavljanje na avtocestah, da bi bile izpolnjene razumne potrebe končnih uporabnikov, zlasti vključno s končnimi uporabniki invalidi.
Designating providers with universal service obligations for an excessive or indefinite period might also lead to an a priori exclusion of certain providers.
Države članice bi morale nadzorovati položaj potrošnikov glede na njihovo uporabo storitve ustreznega širokopasovnega dostopa do interneta in govorne komunikacijske storitve in zlasti glede cenovne dostopnosti.
Where a Member State decides to designate one or more providers for affordability purposes, it should be possible for those providers to be different from those designated for the availability element of universal service.
Cenovna dostopnost storitve ustreznega širokopasovnega dostopa do interneta in govorne komunikacijske storitve je povezana z informacijami, ki jih uporabniki dobijo o stroških uporabe in tudi o relativnih stroških uporabe v primerjavi z drugimi storitvami, povezana pa je tudi z njihovo sposobnostjo nadzora stroškov.
When a provider that is, on an exceptional basis, designated to provide tariff options or packages different from those provided under normal commercial conditions, as identified in accordance with this Directive or to ensure the availability at a fixed location of an adequate broadband internet access service or voice communications services, as identified in accordance with this Directive, chooses to dispose of a substantial part, viewed in light of its universal service obligations, or all, of its local access network assets in the national territory to a separate legal entity under different ultimate ownership, the competent authority should assess the effects of the transaction in order to ensure the continuity of universal service obligations in all or parts of the national territory.
Cenovna dostopnost zato pomeni, da potrošniki dobijo pravice s tem, ko se ponudnikom naložijo obveznosti.
To that end, the competent authority which imposed the universal service obligations should be informed by the provider in advance of the disposal.
Te obveznosti vključujejo določeno stopnjo razčlenjenega obračunavanja, možnost za potrošnike, da selektivno blokirajo nekatere klice, kot so dragi klici premijskih storitev, da nadzorujejo stroške s predplačili, in da vnaprej poravnajo priključnino.
The assessment of the competent authority should not prejudice the completion of the transaction.
Take ukrepe je lahko treba ponovno pregledati in spremeniti z vidika tržnega razvoja.
In order to provide stability and support a gradual transition, Member States should be able to continue to ensure the provision of universal service in their territory, other than adequate broadband internet access and voice communications services at a fixed location, that are included in the scope of their universal service obligations on the basis of Directive 2002/22/EC on the date of entry into force of this Directive, provided the services or comparable services are not available under normal commercial circumstances.
Na razčlenjenih računih o uporabi dostopa do interneta bi morali biti navedeni samo čas, trajanje in količina porabe med eno sejo, ne bi pa smele biti navedene spletne strani ali internetne končne točke, na katere je bil uporabnik povezan med zadevno sejo.
Allowing the continuation of the provision of public payphones to the general public by use of coins, credit or debit cards, or pre-payment cards, including cards for use with dialling codes, directories and directory enquiry services under the universal service regime, for as long as the need is demonstrated, would give Member States the flexibility necessary to duly take into account the varying national circumstances.
Razen v primerih nenehnih zamud pri plačilu ali neplačevanja računov bi bilo treba potrošnike, ki so upravičeni do cenovno dostopnih tarif, dokler se spor ne reši, zaščititi pred takojšnjim odklopom z omrežja zaradi neplačanega računa, zlasti pa bi morali imeti v primeru sporov zaradi visokih računov za premijske storitve še naprej dostop do osnovnih govornih komunikacijskih storitev in minimalne ravni storitev dostopa do interneta, kakor so jo določile države članice.
This can include providing public pay telephones in the main entry points of the country, such as airports or train and bus stations, as well as places used by people in the case of an emergency, such as hospitals, police stations and highway emergency areas, to meet the reasonable needs of end-users, including in particular end-users with disabilities.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da določijo, da se tak dostop še naprej zagotavlja samo, če naročnik še naprej plačuje najemnino za vod ali osnovni dostop do interneta.
Member States should monitor the situation of consumers with respect to their use of adequate broadband internet access and voice communications services and in particular with respect to affordability.
Kadar se zaradi zagotavljanja storitve ustreznega širokopasovnega dostopa do interneta in govorne komunikacijske storitve ali zagotavljanja drugih storitev v skladu s to direktivo ponudnik neupravičeno obremeni, se lahko to neupravičeno breme ob ustreznem upoštevanju stroškov in prihodkov ter tudi nematerialnih koristi, ki izhajajo iz zagotavljanja zadevnih storitev, vključi v vsak izračun neto stroškov za obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve.
The affordability of adequate broadband internet access and voice communications services is related to the information which users receive regarding usage expenses as well as the relative cost of usage compared to other services, and is also related to their ability to control expenditure.
Države članice bi morale po potrebi vzpostaviti mehanizme za financiranje neto stroškov obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve, kadar se pokaže, da se lahko obveznosti zagotovijo samo z izgubo ali z neto stroški, ki presegajo običajne komercialne standarde.
Affordability therefore means giving power to consumers through obligations imposed on providers.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da se neto stroški obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve izračunajo pravilno in da vsako financiranje povzroča minimalno izkrivljanje na trgu in za podjetja ter da je skladno s členoma 107 in 108 PDEU.
Those obligations include a specified level of itemised billing, the possibility for consumers selectively to block certain calls, such as high-priced calls to premium services, to control expenditure via pre-payment means, and to offset up-front connection fees.
Pri vsakem izračunu neto stroškov obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve bi se morali ustrezno upoštevati stroški in prihodki, pa tudi nematerialne koristi, ki izhajajo iz zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve, vendar to ne bi smelo ovirati splošnega cilja, po katerem naj bi cenovne strukture odražale stroške.
Such measures may need to be reviewed and changed in light of market developments.
Vsi neto stroški obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve bi se morali izračunati na podlagi preglednih postopkov.
Itemised bills on the usage of internet access should indicate only the time, duration and amount of consumption during a usage session but not indicate the websites or internet end-points connected to during such a usage session.
Upoštevanje nematerialnih koristi pomeni, da se v monetarnem smislu ocenijo posredne koristi, ki jih podjetje pridobi zaradi svojega položaja ponudnika univerzalne storitve, in pri določitvi celotnega stroškovnega bremena odštejejo od neposrednih neto stroškov obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve.
Except in cases of persistent late payment or non-payment of bills, consumers entitled to affordable tariffs should, pending resolution of the dispute, be protected from immediate disconnection from the network on the grounds of an unpaid bill and, in particular, in the case of disputes over high bills for premium-rate services, continue to have access to essential voice communications services and a minimum service level of internet access as defined by Member States.
Kadar obveznost zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve pomeni neupravičeno breme za ponudnika je primerno, da se državam članicam omogoči, da vzpostavijo mehanizme za učinkovito povračilo neto stroškov.
It should be possible for Member States to decide that such access is to continue to be provided only if the subscriber continues to pay line rental or basic internet access charges.
Povračilo z javnimi sredstvi je ena od metod povračila neto stroškov obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve.
Where the provision of adequate broadband internet access and voice communications services or the provision of other services in accordance with this Directive result in an unfair burden on a provider, taking due account of the costs and revenues as well as the intangible benefits resulting from the provision of the services concerned, that unfair burden can be included in any net cost calculation of universal service obligations.
Druga metoda je delitev neto stroškov obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve med ponudnike elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev.
Member States should, where necessary, establish mechanisms for financing the net cost of universal service obligations where it is demonstrated that the obligations can only be provided at a loss or at a net cost which falls outside normal commercial standards.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost financiranja neto stroškov različnih elementov univerzalne storitve z različnimi mehanizmi ali možnost financiranja neto stroškov nekaterih ali vseh elementov z enim od teh mehanizmov ali s kombinacijo obeh.
It is important to ensure that the net cost of universal service obligations is properly calculated and that any financing is undertaken with minimum distortion to the market and to undertakings, and is compatible with Articles 107 and 108 TFEU.
Ustrezen širokopasovni dostop do interneta prinaša koristi ne samo za sektor elektronskih komunikacij, ampak tudi za širše digitalno gospodarstvo in družbo kot celoto.
Any calculation of the net cost of universal service obligations should take due account of costs and revenues, as well as the intangible benefits resulting from providing universal service, but should not hinder the general aim of ensuring that pricing structures reflect costs.
Zagotavljanje povezave, ki podpira hitrosti širokopasovnega omrežja, vse večjemu številu končnih uporabnikov omogoča, da uporabljajo spletne storitve in da aktivno sodelujejo v digitalni družbi.
Any net costs of universal service obligations should be calculated on the basis of transparent procedures.
Zagotavljanje takih povezav na podlagi obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve je tako v javnem interesu kot v interesu ponudnikov elektronskih komunikacij.
Taking into account intangible benefits means that an estimate in monetary terms, of the indirect benefits that an undertaking derives by virtue of its position as universal service provider, should be deducted from the direct net cost of universal service obligations in order to determine the overall cost burden.
Države članice bi morale ta dejstva upoštevati pri izbiri in oblikovanju mehanizmov za povračilo neto stroškov.
When a universal service obligation represents an unfair burden on a provider, it is appropriate to allow Member States to establish mechanisms for efficiently recovering net costs.
Pri povračilu stroškov z delitvijo neto stroškov obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve med ponudnike elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da metoda dodeljevanja med ponudnike temelji na objektivnih in nediskriminatornih merilih ter je v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti.
Recovery via public funds constitutes one method of recovering the net costs of universal service obligations.
To načelo ne preprečuje državam članicam, da bi izvzele nove ponudnike, ki niso dosegli večje prisotnosti na trgu.
Sharing the net costs of universal service obligations between providers of electronic communications networks and services is another method.
Vsak mehanizem financiranja bi moral zagotavljati, da udeleženci na trgu prispevajo samo k financiranju obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve in ne k drugim dejavnostim, ki niso neposredno povezane z zagotavljanjem obveznosti univerzalne storitve.
Member States should be able to finance the net costs of different elements of universal service through different mechanisms, or to finance the net costs of some or all elements from either of the mechanisms or a combination of both.
Pri povračilnih mehanizmih bi se morala upoštevati načela prava Unije, v primeru mehanizmov delitve pa zlasti načeli nediskriminacije in sorazmernosti.
Adequate broadband internet access brings benefits not only to the electronic communications sector but also to the wider online economy and to society as a whole.
Vsak mehanizem financiranja bi moral zagotavljati, da uporabniki v eni državi članici ne prispevajo k stroškom zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve v drugi državi članici.
Providing a connection which supports broadband speeds to an increased number of end-users enables them to use online services and so actively to participate in the digital society.
Obstajati bi morala možnost, da se neto stroški obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve razdelijo med vse ali nekatere posebne skupine ponudnikov.
Ensuring such connections on the basis of universal service obligations serves both the public interest and the interests of electronic communications providers.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se pri mehanizmu delitve upoštevajo načela preglednosti, najmanjšega izkrivljanja trga, nediskriminacije in sorazmernosti.
Those facts should be taken into account by Member States when choosing and designing mechanisms for recovering net costs.
Najmanjše izkrivljanje trga pomeni, da bi morali biti prispevki povrnjeni na način, ki v največji možni meri zmanjšuje učinek finančnega bremena, ki pade na končne uporabnike, na primer s čim širšo porazdelitvijo prispevkov.
In the case of cost recovery by means of sharing the net cost of universal service obligations between providers of electronic communications networks and services, Member States should ensure that the method of allocation amongst providers is based on objective and non-discriminatory criteria and is in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
Ponudniki, ki imajo korist od financiranja univerzalne storitve, bi morali nacionalnim regulativnim organom dovolj natančno opredeliti specifične elemente, za katere se zahteva tako financiranje, da bi utemeljili svojo zahtevo.
This principle does not prevent Member States from exempting new entrants which have not achieved any significant market presence.
Sheme držav članic za obračunavanje stroškov obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve in njihovo financiranje bi bilo treba sporočiti Komisiji, da se preveri združljivost s PDEU.
Any funding mechanism should ensure that market participants only contribute to the financing of universal service obligations and not to other activities which are not directly linked to the provision of the universal service obligations.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti učinkovito preglednost in nadzor zneskov, ki se zaračunavajo za financiranje obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve.
Recovery mechanisms should respect the principles of Union law, and in particular in the case of sharing mechanisms those of non-discrimination and proportionality.
Izračun neto stroškov zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve bi moral temeljiti na objektivni in pregledni metodologiji, da se omogoči najučinkovitejše zagotavljanje univerzalne storitve in spodbujajo enaki konkurenčni pogoji za udeležence na trgu.
Any funding mechanism should ensure that users in one Member State do not contribute to the costs of providing universal service in another Member State.
Z vnaprejšnjim razkritjem metodologije za izračun neto stroškov posameznih elementov univerzalne storitve še pred dejanskim izračunom bi se lahko dosegla večja preglednost.
It should be possible to share the net cost of universal service obligations between all or certain specified classes of providers.
Države članice udeležencem na trgu ne smejo naložiti finančnih prispevkov za ukrepe, ki niso del obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve.
Member States should ensure that the sharing mechanism respects the principles of transparency, least market distortion, non-discrimination and proportionality.
Posamezne države članice se lahko prosto odločijo, da bodo uvedle posebne ukrepe (izven okvira obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve) in jih financirale v skladu s pravom Unije, vendar ne s prispevki udeležencev na trgu.
Least market distortion means that contributions should be recovered in a way that as far as possible minimises the impact of the financial burden falling on end-users, for example by spreading contributions as widely as possible.
Da bi učinkovito podprli prosti pretok blaga, storitev in oseb v Uniji, bi moralo biti možno, da se nekatere nacionalne številske vire, zlasti nekatere negeografske številke, uporabijo ekstrateritorialno, torej zunaj ozemlja države članice, ki jih dodeli.
Providers benefiting from universal service funding should provide national regulatory authorities with a sufficient level of detail of the specific elements requiring such funding in order to justify their request.
Zaradi znatnega tveganja goljufije pri medosebnih komunikacijah bi morala biti taka ekstrateritorialna uporaba dovoljena samo za zagotavljanje elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev, ki niso medosebne komunikacijske storitve.
Member States’ schemes for the costing and financing of universal service obligations should be communicated to the Commission for verification of compatibility with the TFEU.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti izvrševanje ustrezne nacionalne zakonodaje, zlasti pravil za varstvo potrošnikov in drugih pravil, povezanih z uporabo številskih virov, in sicer neodvisno od tega, kje v Uniji so bile pravice uporabe podeljene in kje se številski viri uporabljajo.
Member States should ensure effective transparency and control of amounts charged to finance universal service obligations.
Države članice so še naprej pristojne za uporabo svojega nacionalnega prava za številske vire, ki se uporabljajo na njihovem ozemlju, tudi če so bile pravice podeljene v drugi državi članici.
Calculation of the net costs of providing universal service should be based on an objective and transparent methodology to ensure the most cost-effective provision of universal service and promote a level playing field for market participants.
Nacionalni regulativni ali drugi pristojni organi držav članic v primeru uporabe številskih virov iz druge države članice nimajo nadzora nad temi številskimi viri.
Making the methodology intended to be used to calculate the net costs of individual universal service elements known in advance before implementing the calculation could help to achieve increased transparency.
Zato je bistveno, da bi nacionalni regulativni ali drugi pristojni organi države članice, ki podeli pravice ekstrateritorialne uporabe, zagotovili tudi učinkovito zaščito končnih uporabnikov v državah članicah, v katerih se te številke uporabljajo.
Member States are not permitted to impose on market participants financial contributions which relate to measures which are not part of the universal service obligations.
Da bi dosegli učinkovito zaščito, bi moral nacionalni regulativni ali drugi pristojni organ, ki podeli pravice ekstrateritorialne uporabe, določiti pogoje v skladu s to direktivo v zvezi s spoštovanjem pravil s strani ponudnika glede varstva potrošnikov in drugih pravil v zvezi z uporabo številskih virov v tistih državah članicah, v katerih se bodo ti viri uporabljali.
Individual Member States remain free to impose special measures (outside the scope of universal service obligations) and finance them in accordance with Union law but not by means of contributions from market participants.
Nacionalni regulativni ali drugi pristojni organi tistih držav članic, v katerih se uporabljajo številski viri, bi morali imeti možnost, da zaprosijo nacionalne regulativne ali druge pristojne organe, ki so podelili pravice uporabe številskih virov, za pomoč pri izvrševanju njihovih pravil.
In order to effectively support the free movement of goods, services and persons within the Union, it should be possible to use certain national numbering resources, in particular certain non-geographic numbers, in an extraterritorial manner, that is to say outside the territory of the assigning Member State.
Izvršilni ukrepi nacionalnih regulativnih ali drugih pristojnih organov, ki so podelili pravice uporabe, bi morali vključevati odvračilne kazni, in sicer zlasti v primeru resne kršitve odvzem pravice ekstrateritorialne uporabe številskih virov, dodeljenih zadevnemu podjetju.
In light of the considerable risk of fraud with respect to interpersonal communications, such extraterritorial use should be allowed only for the provision of electronic communications services other than interpersonal communications services.
Zahteve po ekstrateritorialni uporabi ne bi smele posegati v pristojnost držav članic, da v posameznih primerih blokirajo dostop do številk ali storitev, kadar je to upravičeno zaradi goljufije ali zlorabe.
Enforcement of relevant national laws, in particular consumer protection rules and other rules related to the use of numbering resources should be ensured by Member States independently of where the rights of use have been granted and where the numbering resources are used within the Union.
Ekstrateritorialna uporaba številskih virov ne bi smela posegati v pravila Unije, povezana z zagotavljanjem storitev gostovanja, tudi tista, ki se nanašajo na preprečevanje nepravilne uporabe ali zlorabe storitev gostovanja, za katere velja ureditev maloprodajnih cen in za katere se uporabljajo regulirane veleprodajne cene gostovanja.