natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Producers of grapevine products bearing a name protected as a designation of origin or geographical indication have to face a changing and challenging market.
Proizvajalcem proizvodov vinske trte z imenom, zaščitenim kot označba porekla ali geografska označba, bi bilo treba poleg tega omogočiti, da upoštevajo razvoj na področju znanstvenega in tehničnega znanja ter okoljske spremembe.
They require procedures allowing them to swiftly adapt to market demands, however, they are in fact penalised by the length and complexity of the current amendment procedure, the effect of which impedes their ability to react quickly to the market.
Za zmanjšanje števila stopenj takih postopkov in uveljavitev načela subsidiarnosti na tem področju bi bilo treba na ravni države članice odobriti odločitve o spremembah, ki se ne nanašajo na bistvene elemente specifikacije proizvoda.
Producers of grapevine products bearing a name protected as a designation of origin or geographical indication should also be allowed to take account of developments in scientific and technical knowledge and of environmental changes.
Proizvajalcem bi moralo biti omogočeno, da zadevne spremembe uporabijo takoj po zaključku nacionalnega postopka.
In order to reduce the steps of such procedures and to give effect in this area to the principle of subsidiarity, decisions on amendments which do not concern essential elements of the product specification should be approved at Member State's level.
Ponovno preverjanje vloge za odobritev na ravni Unije se ne bi smel zahtevati.
Producers should be enabled to apply those amendments immediately on the conclusion of the national procedure.
Vendar bi morala biti Komisija za zaščito interesov tretjih oseb s sedežem v državah članicah, ki niso država članica, v kateri se proizvajajo proizvodi vinske trte, še naprej odgovorna za odobritev sprememb, za katere se zahteva postopek ugovora na ravni Unije.
There should be no requirement to re-examine the application for approval at Union level.
Zato bi bilo treba uvesti novo razvrstitev sprememb: standardne spremembe, ki se začnejo uporabljati takoj, ko jih država članica odobri, saj ne zahtevajo postopka ugovora na ravni Unije, in spremembe Unije, ki se začnejo uporabljati šele potem, ko jih odobri Komisija po zaključku postopka ugovora na ravni Unije.
However, in order to protect the interests of third parties established in Member States other than the one in which the grapevine products is produced, the Commission should remain responsible for approving amendments for which an objection procedure is required at Union level.
Uvesti bi bilo treba začasne spremembe, da bi se lahko proizvodi vinske trte z zaščiteno označbo porekla ali geografsko označbo še naprej tržili pod zaščitenimi imeni v primeru naravnih nesreč ali neugodnih vremenskih razmer ali sprejetja sanitarnih ali fitosanitarnih ukrepov, zaradi katerih izvajalci začasno ne morejo izpolnjevati zahtev specifikacije proizvoda.
Therefore, a new classification of amendments should be introduced: standard amendments, which apply immediately following the approval by the Member State since they do not require an objection procedure at Union level, and Union amendments, which apply only following approval by the Commission subsequent upon the completion of an objection procedure at Union level.
Zaradi njihove nujnosti bi se morale začasne spremembe začeti uporabljati takoj, ko jih država članica odobri.
Temporary amendments should be introduced to allow grapevine products bearing a protected designation of origin or geographical indication to continue to be marketed under the protected names in cases of natural disaster or adverse weather conditions or adoption of sanitary or phytosanitary measures which temporarily prevent operators from complying with the product specification.
Seznam nujnih razlogov za začasne spremembe je izčrpen zaradi izjemnega značaja začasnih sprememb.
Due to their emergency nature, temporary amendments should apply immediately following the approval by the Member State.
Za spremembe na ravni Unije bi bilo treba uporabljati postopek za vloge za zaščito, da se zagotovijo enaka učinkovitost in jamstva.
The list of emergency grounds for temporary amendments is exhaustive due to the exceptional character of temporary amendments.
Uporabljati bi se moral smiselno z izključitvijo nekaterih stopenj, ki bi jih bilo treba zaradi zmanjšanja upravnega bremena izpustiti.
Union amendments should follow the procedure governing applications for protection in order to have the same efficiency and guarantees.
Vzpostaviti bi bilo treba postopek za standardne in začasne spremembe, da bi lahko države članice ustrezno ocenjevale vloge in da bi se zagotovil skladen pristop v vseh državah članicah.
It should be applied mutatis mutandis with the exclusion of certain steps which should be omitted with a view to reducing the administrative burden.
Natančnost in izčrpnost ocene držav članic bi morala biti enakovredna natančnosti in izčrpnosti, ki se zahtevata za postopek ocenjevanja v okviru postopka, ki se uporablja za vloge za zaščito.
The procedure for standard amendments and temporary amendments should be established to allow Member States to carry out an appropriate assessment of the applications and to guarantee a consistent approach across Member States.
Pri standardnih in začasnih spremembah, povezanih z zaščitenimi označbami porekla in geografskimi označbami tretjih držav, bi bilo treba uporabljati pristop, določen za države članice, odločitev o odobritvi pa bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s sistemom, veljavnim v zadevni tretji državi.
The accuracy and exhaustiveness of Member States' assessment should be equivalent to the accuracy and exhaustiveness required for the assessment process within the procedure governing applications for the protection.
Postopek preklica bi moral biti preglednejši in jasnejši.
Standard and temporary amendments related to the protected designations of origin and geographical indications of third countries should follow the approach provided for Member States, and the approval decision should be taken in accordance with the system in force in the third country in question.
Zlasti bi moralo biti mogoče nasprotovati zahtevku za preklic.
The cancellation procedure should be more transparent and clear.
V ta namen bi se moral za postopek preklica smiselno uporabljati standardni postopek, ki se uporablja za vloge za zaščito, le da bi bile izključene nekatere stopnje, ki bi jih bilo treba izpustiti za zmanjšanje upravnega bremena.
In particular, it should be possible to oppose the cancellation request.
Omogočen bi moral biti preklic zaščitenih imen, če se ime na trgu ne uporablja več.
To that end, the cancellation procedure should follow the standard procedure governing applications for protection, mutatis mutandis, with the exclusion of certain steps which should be omitted to reduce the administrative burden.
Sprejeti bi bilo treba pravila o začasnem označevanju in predstavitvi proizvodov vinske trte, katerih ime je predmet vloge za zaščito kot označba porekla ali geografska označba, da bi se zagotovila zaščita zakonitih interesov izvajalcev, ob upoštevanju načela poštene konkurence in obveznosti sporočanja ustreznih informacij potrošnikom.
It should be possible to cancel protected names if a name is no longer in use in the market place.
Nekatere zaščitene označbe porekla so upravičene do odstopanj od obveznosti uporabe izraza „zaščitena označba porekla“ na etiketah.
Rules on temporary labelling and the presentation of grapevine products whose name has been the subject of an application for protection as a designation of origin or geographical indication should be adopted in order to ensure the protection of the legitimate interests of the operators while taking into account the principle of fair competition and the obligation to ensure that appropriate information is communicated to consumers.
Za ohranitev te zgodovinske pravice je primerno potrditi obstoj tega odstopanja za taka imena.
Certain protected designations of origin benefit from derogations from the obligation to use the term ‘protected designation of origin’ on labels.
Uporaba tradicionalnih izrazov za opis proizvodov vinske trte je v Uniji ustaljena praksa.
In order to maintain this historical concession it is appropriate to confirm the existence of this derogation for such names.
Taki izrazi označujejo postopek proizvodnje ali metode staranja, kakovost, barvo, vrsto kraja ali poseben dogodek, povezan z zgodovino proizvoda vinske trte z zaščiteno označbo porekla ali geografsko označbo, ali nakazujejo, da gre za proizvod vinske trte z zaščiteno označbo porekla ali geografsko označbo.
The use of traditional terms to describe grapevine products is a long-established practice in the Union.
V členih 112 in 113 Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 so določena splošna pravila za uporabo in zaščito tradicionalnih izrazov.
Such terms designate a production or ageing method, the quality, colour, type of place or a particular event linked to the history of a grapevine product bearing a protected designation of origin or geographical indication or indicate that it is a grapevine product having a protected designation of origin or geographical indication.
Tako bi bilo treba za zagotovitev poštene konkurence in preprečitev zavajanja potrošnikov določiti skupni okvir za zaščito in registracijo takih tradicionalnih izrazov.
Articles 112 and 113 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 lay down the general rules regarding the use and protection of traditional terms.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba postopke v zvezi z odobritvijo zaščite tradicionalnih izrazov poenostaviti in uskladiti, kjer je to mogoče, s postopki, ki se uporabljajo za odobritev zaščite označb porekla in geografskih označb.
So as to ensure fair competition and avoid misleading consumers, a common framework should be laid down regarding the protection and registration of such traditional terms.
Tradicionalni izraz lahko opozarja na posebne lastnosti proizvoda vinske trte, za katerega se uporablja zadevni izraz.
Furthermore, the procedures concerning the grant of protection to traditional terms should be simplified and harmonised, where possible, with the procedures applicable to the grant of protection to designations of origin and geographical indications.
Zato bi moral biti za izražanje jasnih informacij zadevni izraz naveden samo v jeziku, ki se običajno uporablja, v izvirnem zapisu in izvirni pisavi.
A traditional term may evoke the particular characteristics of the grapevine product bearing that traditional term.
Da se prepreči zavajanje potrošnikov, bi morala biti uporaba tradicionalnih izrazov za proizvode vinske trte, proizvedene v tretjih državah, dovoljena, če izpolnjujejo enake ali enakovredne pogoje, kot se zahtevajo od držav članic.
Therefore, in order to convey clear information, that term should be indicated only in the language customarily used, with its original spelling and script.
Zato bi moralo biti državam članicam in tretjim državam omogočeno, da vložijo vlogo za zaščito tradicionalnega izraza na ravni Unije.
In order to ensure that consumers are not misled, the use of traditional terms for grapevine products manufactured in third countries should be allowed provided they fulfil the same or equivalent conditions to those required from Member States.
Ker pa nekatere tretje države nimajo enakega centraliziranega sistema zaščite tradicionalnih izrazov kot Unija, bi bilo treba določiti opredelitev „reprezentativne strokovne organizacije“, ki deluje v tretjih državah, da se zagotovijo enaka jamstva, kot jih določajo predpisi Unije.
Therefore, both Member States and third countries should have the possibility to apply for the protection of a traditional term at Union level.
Države članice, tretje države ali reprezentativne strokovne organizacije, ki delujejo v tretjih državah, bi morale zagotoviti, da je vloga za zaščito, predložena Komisiji, popolna in da vsebuje vse pomembne informacije, ki Komisiji omogočajo ugotovitev, da tradicionalni izraz izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 112 Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013, in dokazujejo, da je tradicionalni izraz v državi članici že zaščiten.
Having regard to the fact that some third countries do not have the same centralised system of protection of traditional terms as the Union, the definition of ‘representative professional organisations’ operating in third countries should be laid down to ensure the same guarantees as those provided for in the Union rules.
Zaščita bi se morala odobriti le za tradicionalne izraze, ki so splošno znani in imajo pomemben ekonomski vpliv na proizvode vinske trte, za katere so rezervirani.
Member States, third countries or representative professional organisations operating in third countries should ensure that the application for protection submitted to the Commission is complete and contains all relevant information that allows the Commission to establish that the traditional term complies with the conditions laid down in Article 112 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and proves that the traditional term is already protected in the Member State.
Zato bi morala Komisija odobriti vloge za zaščito tradicionalnega izraza le, če vloga zagotavlja izčrpne dokaze, da se izraz tradicionalno uporablja za opis proizvodov vinske trte, ki se proizvajajo na velikem delu ozemlja Unije, ali da gre za uveljavljeno ime, ki se tradicionalno uporablja na celotnem ozemlju države članice ali tretje države, da je zagotovljena poštena konkurenca za proizvajalce, ki so zadevni izraz uporabljali pred odobritvijo zaščite, in da tradicionalni izraz ni generičen.
Protection should only be granted to traditional terms that are widely known and have a significant economic impact on the grapevine products for which they are reserved.
V ta namen bi bilo treba v tej uredbi opredeliti pomen izrazov „tradicionalna uporaba“ in „generično“.
Therefore, the Commission should approve applications for the protection of a traditional term only where the application provides exhaustive evidence that the term is traditionally used to describe grapevine products produced in a large part of the territory of the Union or is a reputed name traditionally used in the entire territory of a Member State or third country, that fair competition is guaranteed for producers that used that term prior to the grant of protection and that the traditional term is not a generic term.
Komisija bi morala pregledati vlogo za zaščito tradicionalnega izraza, da bi zagotovila, da je ustrezno izpolnjena in da izpolnjuje pogoje iz te uredbe.
To this end, the meaning of ‘traditional use’ and ‘generic’ should be defined in this Regulation.
Za zagotovitev, da ni kakršnih koli ovir za zaščito tradicionalnega izraza, bi morala imeti vsaka država članica ali tretja država ali vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba, ki ima zakoniti interes, možnost ugovarjati zaščiti zadevnega tradicionalnega izraza.
If the application requirements are not met, the Commission should request the applicant to make the necessary modifications or to withdraw the application.
Poleg tega bi morala Komisija v primeru, da se ugovor šteje za dopustnega, vložniku zagotoviti kopijo prejetega ugovora, da bi strankam olajšala sklenitev dogovora.
In the absence of action on the part of the applicant, the application should be rejected.
Če stranke ne dosežejo dogovora, bi morala Komisija odločiti o ugovoru ter odobriti zaščito ali zavrniti vlogo za zaščito tradicionalnega izraza.
To ensure the absence of any obstacle to the protection of a traditional term, any Member State or third country, or any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, should have the option of objecting to the protection of that traditional term.
Za zagotovitev jasnosti za potrošnike, kar zadeva naravo in poreklo proizvoda, ter za zagotovitev poštene konkurence med proizvajalci je treba določiti pogoje uporabe blagovnih znamk, ki vsebujejo tradicionalni izraz ali so sestavljene iz njega, in za uporabo homonimnih tradicionalnih izrazov.
In order for the objection to be deemed admissible, the objection should be substantiated and should demonstrate that the application is not in compliance with Union rules on traditional terms.
Da bi se upošteval razvoj vzorcev porabe ter obravnavale spremembe na področju proizvodnje proizvodov vinske trte in trženja, bi moralo biti državam članicam in tretjim državam omogočeno, da vložijo vlogo za spremembo ali preklic tradicionalnega izraza.
Furthermore, in case the objection is considered admissible, the Commission should provide the applicant with a copy of the objection received in order to facilitate the parties to reach an agreement.
Da bi se vloge za spremembo ali preklic tradicionalnega izraza štele za dopustne, bi morale biti ustrezno utemeljene.
If no agreement between the parties is reached, the Commission should rule on the objection and grant the protection or reject the application for protection of the traditional term.
Sistem, ki je v tretjih državah vzpostavljen za zaščito in uporabo tradicionalnih izrazov, se lahko razlikuje od sistema, vzpostavljenega v Uniji.
In order to ensure clarity for consumers as regards the nature and origin of the product and in order to ensure fair competition among producers, it is necessary to establish the conditions of use for trade marks that contain or consist of a traditional term and for the use of homonymous traditional terms.
Zaradi doslednosti bi morala biti uporaba tradicionalnih izrazov za opis proizvodov vinske trte, proizvedenih v tretjih državah, dovoljena, če niso v nasprotju z pravom Unije.
In order to take account of the evolution in consumption patterns and to address grapevine products production and marketing developments, it should be possible for Member States and third countries to apply to modify or cancel a traditional term.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba pridobljeno pravico do zaščite tradicionalnih izrazov, zaščitenih v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 607/2009.
To be deemed admissible, applications to modify or cancel a traditional term should be duly substantiated.
Zadevni izrazi bi morali biti zato še naprej samodejno zaščiteni v skladu s to uredbo.
The system in place in third countries for the protection and use of traditional terms may differ from the one in place within the Union.
V členih od 117 do 121 Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 so določena splošna pravila za označevanje in predstavitev proizvodov vinske trte.
For consistency purposes, the use of traditional terms to describe grapevine products produced in third countries should be allowed provided that they do not conflict with Union law.
Z navedeno uredbo je usklajena tudi uporaba izrazov, ki niso izrecno opredeljeni v zakonodaji Unije, če niso zavajajoči.
The acquired right of protection of traditional terms protected under Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 should be taken into account.
Za nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga bi bilo treba določiti pravila Unije o uporabi obveznih navedb na oznakah za proizvode vinske trte.
Those terms should therefore continue to be automatically protected under this Regulation.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba za preprečevanje zavajanja potrošnikov določiti tudi določbe o uporabi neobveznih navedb na oznakah.
Articles 117 to 121 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 lay down the general rules for the labelling and presentation of grapevine products.
Za pomoč potrošnikom bi bilo treba obvezne informacije na posodi navesti skupaj v istem vidnem polju.
That Regulation also harmonises the use of terms other than those expressly specified by Union legislation, provided that they are not misleading.
Vendar bi morale biti v skladu z zahtevami iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1169/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta nekatere obvezne navedbe, kot sta navedba uvoznika in seznam sestavin, ki lahko povzročijo alergije ali preobčutljivosti, izvzete iz te obveznosti.
For the smooth functioning of the internal market, Union rules on the use of compulsory labelling particulars for grapevine products should be laid down.
V skladu s pogoji iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1169/2011 so snovi ali proizvodi, ki lahko povzročijo alergije ali preobčutljivost, in izrazi, ki se uporabljajo za njihovo navedbo na etiketi živil, navedeni v Prilogi II k navedeni uredbi.
Moreover, in order not to mislead consumers, provisions on the use of optional labelling particulars should also be set out.
V primeru proizvodov vinske trte se uporabljajo tudi drugi izrazi za navajanje proizvodov iz jajc, mlečnih proizvodov in sulfitov.
In order to assist consumers, mandatory information should be grouped in a single visual field on the container.
Navedeni izrazi bi se morali zato uporabljati za označevanje proizvodov vinske trte.
However, in accordance with the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council, certain compulsory particulars, such as the indication of the importer and listing of ingredients that may cause allergies or intolerances should be exempt from this obligation.
Proizvodi vinske trte, proizvedeni v Uniji, se izvažajo v tretje države.
Under the terms of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 the substances or products that may cause allergies or intolerances and the terms to be used to indicate them on the label of foodstuffs are those listed in Annex II therein.
Za zagotovitev, da potrošniki v navedenih državah razumejo informacije, ki se nanašajo na proizvod, ki ga kupijo, bi moral biti omogočen prevod etikete v jezike države uvoznice.
In the case of grapevine products, other terms are also used to refer to egg products, milk products and sulphites.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba za olajšanje trgovine sprejeti določbo, ki bi dovoljevala, da se na etiketah navedejo vse navedbe, ki se zahtevajo z zakonodajo države uvoznice, ne glede na to, ali je to skladno s pravom Unije ali ne.
Those terms should therefore be used for the labelling of grapevine products.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba zaradi varnosti omogočiti odstopanje od zahtev Unije glede predstavitve proizvodov vinske trte, ki so namenjeni porabi na letalu, na primer od zahteve, da se za peneča vina uporabljajo steklenice.
Grapevine products produced within the Union are exported to third countries.
Ohraniti bi bilo treba prepoved uporabe zapork na osnovi svinca kot prevlek za zapiralni mehanizem posod, v katerih se hranijo proizvodi, ki jih zajema Uredba (EU) št. 1308/2013, da bi se preprečilo kakršno koli tveganje okužbe ob stiku s takimi zaporkami, pa tudi tveganje onesnaževanja okolja zaradi odpadkov.
In order to ensure that consumers of those countries understand the information related to the product they purchase, it should be possible to have the label translated into the languages of the importing country.
Ustrezno bi bilo treba upoštevati posebne lastnosti proizvodov vinske trte in stopnjo spremenljivosti vsebnosti alkohola.
Moreover, in order to facilitate trade, provision should be made permitting the labels to display any particulars required by the legislation of the importing country, whether or not compliant with Union law.
Zato bi morala biti dovoljena pozitivna in negativna dovoljena odstopanja, kar zadeva navedbo dejanskega volumenskega deleža alkohola na oznaki.
Moreover, for security reasons, it should also be possible to derogate from Union presentation requirements for grapevine products to be consumed on board of airplanes, such as the obligation to use glass-bottles for sparkling wines.
Za zagotovitev sledljivosti bi bilo treba uvesti pravila o „navedbi izvora“.
The use of lead-based capsules to cover the closing devices of containers holding products covered by Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 should continue to be banned in order to avoid any risk of contamination by contact with such capsules and environmental pollution from waste.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pri takih pravilih upoštevati pričakovanje potrošnikov v zvezi s poreklom proizvodov vinske trte ter grozdja in grozdnega mošta, ki se uporabljata za proizvodnjo končnega proizvoda.
Due regard should be given to the particular nature of grapevine products and the degree of variability of their alcohol content.
Za nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga in preprečitev zavajanja potrošnikov bi morala biti obvezna navedba imena in naslova polnilca, proizvajalca, prodajalca ali uvoznika.