natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Besides that price increase, the costs of purchasing moulds for making boneless ‘Pražská šunka’ should be also counted among the loss of revenue since in Slovakia this technology is not used in the production of ‘Pražská šunka’ (polyamide casings are used).
Tak nakup bi vključeval stroške v višini 70 EUR na enoto za šunko, težko okrog pet kilogramov, kar pomeni 14000 EUR za proizvodnjo ene tone končnega izdelka.
Such purchase would involve the cost of EUR 70 per unit for ham weighing around 5 kg, meaning EUR 14000 to produce 1 tonne of the finished product.
Podobno bi bili pri oblikovanju šunke „Pražská šunka“ s pomočjo folije v primerjavi s proizvodnjo v ovitkih iz poliamida stroški večji tudi zaradi nakupa folije in ročnega dela v višini najmanj 50 EUR/tono končnega izdelka.
Similarly, forming ‘Pražská šunka’ with the aid of film compared to production in polyamide casings would also result in increased costs for the purchase of foil and manual work totalling at least EUR 50/tonne for the finished product.
Poleg tega so trije slovaški proizvajalci lastniki blagovnih znamk za šunko „Pražská šunka“, katerih uporaba bi bila ogrožena.
Furthermore, three Slovak producers hold trade marks for ‘Pražská šunka’ and their use would be at risk.
Slovaška je poleg navedene utemeljitve predlagala, da bi se, če se Komisija kljub predloženim trditvam odloči za registracijo imena, lahko upošteval člen 18(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 in bi se ime „Pražská šunka“ dopolnilo s trditvijo „Izdelano po tradiciji Češke“.
In addition to the reasoning above, Slovakia proposed that if, notwithstanding the allegations submitted, the Commission decide to register the name, Article 18(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 could be taken into account by providing the name ‘Pražská šunka’ be accompanied by the claim ‘made following the tradition of Czech Republic’.
Namesto tega bi se lahko to isto ime spremenilo v „Tradicionalna Pražská šunka“.
In alternative, that same name could be changed into ‘Traditional Pražská šunka’.
Komisija je argumente, navedene v utemeljenem ugovoru Slovaške, obravnavala glede na določbe Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, pri čemer je upoštevala rezultate ustreznih posvetovanj med vlagateljem zahtevka in vlagateljema ugovora, ter sklenila, da bi bilo treba ime „Pražská šunka“ registrirati.
The Commission has assessed the arguments exposed in the reasoned statements of opposition from Slovakia in the light of the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, taking into account the results of the appropriate consultations carried out between the applicant and the opponents and it has concluded that the name ‘Pražská šunka’ should be registered.
Češka je v zvezi s prvim razlogom za ugovor pojasnila, da „Pražská šunka“ tudi pred letom 1993 ni bila zajeta v češkoslovaških državnih standardih (ČSN).
With reference to the first reason for opposition, Czech Republic has clarified that, even before 1993, ‘Pražská šunka’ was not covered by the Czechoslovak State Standards (ČSN).
V tistem delu Češkoslovaške, na katerem leži današnja Češka, se je „Pražská šunka“ proizvajala v skladu s „tehnično-ekonomskim standardom“, ki ga je izdal češki oddelek „Masný průmysl“ (mesna industrija).
In that part of Czechoslovakia which corresponds today to Czech Republic ‘Pražská šunka’ was produced in accordance with the ‘technical-economic standard’ issued by the Czech section of the ‘Masný průmysl’ (meat sectors concern).
V poznih 70. letih prejšnjega stoletja se je v več tovarnah na Češkoslovaškem na ozemlju današnje Češke proizvajala polkonzervirana (pasterizirana) „Pražská šunka“ brez kosti, ki je bila v bistvu v skladu z elementi, navedenimi v specifikaciji proizvoda za ZTP „Pražská šunka“ brez kosti: pasterizacija, uporaba modelov za ovalno obliko, dimljenje in slanina s kožo ali brez nje kot okrasni sloj.
In the late 1970s semi-preserved (pasteurised) boneless Pražská šunka was produced, in several plants of Czechoslovakia within the territory of the present Czech Republic, essentially following the elements which can be found in the product specification for boneless ‘Pražská šunka’ TSG: pasteurisation, use of moulds for oval shape, smoking and pork fat or pork fat and skin as a decorative layer.
Poleg tega se isti proizvod, polkonzervirana šunka „Pražská šunka“ brez kosti, že desetletja proizvaja v drugih državah, kot sta Avstrija in Nemčija.
In addition, the same product, semi-preserved boneless ‘Pražská šunka’, has been produced for decades in other countries such as Austria and Germany.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega bi bilo treba skleniti, da šunka „Pražská šunka“ brez kosti in metoda proizvodnje ustrezata tradicionalni praksi, ki obstaja že več kot 30 let.
In the light of the above, it should be concluded that boneless ‘Pražská šunka’ and its production method correspond to traditional practice existing since more than 30 years.
Ni zahtevano, da mora imeti proizvod za registracijo imena kot ZTP posebne lastnosti.
There is no requirement that a product must have a specific character for its name to be registered as TSG.
V členu 19(1)(b) so „posebne lastnosti“ navedene kot element opisa, posebne lastnosti zadevnega proizvoda pa so ustrezno opisane za vse tri različice, zajete v specifikaciji proizvoda.
Article 19(1)(b) refers to ‘specific character’ as an element of the description and the specific character of the product is sufficiently described for all three versions covered by the product specification.
Kar zadeva drugi razlog za ugovor, ni nobenega razloga za sklep, da je to ime postalo generično.
With reference to the second reason of opposition, there are no grounds to conclude that the term has become generic.
Slovaška za tak sklep ni podala nobene utemeljitve.
Slovakia did not give any reasoning leading to such a conclusion.
Dejstvo, da se tak proizvod proizvaja v več državah Evrope, samo po sebi ne more biti razlog za sklep glede generičnosti takega imena.
The fact that such a product is produced in several countries in Europe cannot be considered per se as a ground to conclude for genericity of such a name.
Vsekakor pa generičnost kot taka ni podlaga za nasprotovanje ZTP.
In any event, genericity as such is not a ground for opposition for TSGs.
Proizvodi z oznako ZTP se lahko zakonito proizvajajo kjer koli, ob upoštevanju skladnosti s specifikacijo proizvoda.
TSGs can legally be produced anywhere, subject to complying with the product specification.
Kot tretji razlog za ugovor Slovaška navaja, da je uporaba imena zakonita, splošno znana in gospodarsko pomembna za podobne kmetijske proizvode ali živila na Slovaškem.
As third reason of opposition, Slovakia contends that the use of the name is lawful, renowned and economically significant for similar agricultural product or foodstuffs in Slovakia.
Komisija priznava te okoliščine.
However, it considers that first, the reason why the product produced in Slovakia may not be captured in the product specification for ‘Pražská šunka’ TSG can essentially be found in the circumstance that Slovakia has changed the recipe and the presentation of the product after the independence of both Czech and Slovak Republics, i.e. after 1 January 1993.
Slovaški organi so poročali tudi, da se je istočasno spremenil tudi videz proizvoda, saj so se prenehali uporabljati modeli in toplotna obdelava, kar je bilo v celoti nadomeščeno s pakiranjem proizvoda v ovitke iz poliamida.
Slovaks authorities reported that the decree creating the three categories of 1) special ham, 2) selected ham and 3) standard ham (based on the minimum content of pure muscle protein in percentage by weight, 16 %, 13 % and 10 % respectively) was adopted by the Slovak Ministry of Agriculture and the Slovak Ministry of Health on 18 August 2005.
Čeprav Slovaška navaja, da se je proizvodnja šunke „Pražská šunka“ tudi na Češkem razvila po neodvisnosti, se zdi jasno, da se je metoda proizvodnje bistveno in izredno spremenila na Slovaškem.
Before that date the minimum content of pure muscle protein in percentage by weight was 18 %.
Drugič, Češka je v primerjavi s prvotno specifikacijo proizvoda, ki je bila objavljena leta 2010, znatno ublažila zahteve specifikacije proizvoda, da bi vključila največje število načinov proizvodnje in tako registrirala dobro razširjen in deljen ZTP.
100 % of ‘Pražská šunka’ produced in Slovakia with 18 % minimum content of pure muscle protein in percentage by weight would have qualified for ‘Pražská šunka’ TSG.
Dejansko so dogovor v dveh postopkih z ugovorom dosegli vsi priznani vlagatelji ugovora razen Slovaške.
Slovak authorities have also reported that, at the same time, the presentation of the product was also changed with moulding and heat treatment being abandoned and replaced entirely by the product being stuffed into polyamide casings.
Tretjič, pri izračunu stroškov za prilagoditev proizvodnje specifikacijam ZTP „Pražská šunka“ se zdi, da se ne upošteva dejstvo, da je mogoče kovinske modele uporabljati daljše časovno obdobje.
Although Slovakia indicates that the production of ‘Pražská šunka’ evolved also in the Czech Republic after the independence, it clearly appears that it is in Slovakia that the method of production has been essentially and remarkably changed.
Četrtič, uporaba modelov ni obvezna, saj so na voljo druge možnosti.
Second, compared with the initial product specification published in 2010, Czech Republic has substantially softened the requirements of the product specification with the aim of including the largest number of production methods and therefore registering a well widespread and shared TSG.
Lahko se uporabi plastična folija.
Indeed, all the admitted opponents in the two opposition procedures found an agreement with the exclusion of Slovakia.
Sicer pa se zdi, da 50 EUR/tono končnega izdelka za nakup folije in ročno delo ne pomeni nesorazmernih stroškov.
Third, the calculation of costs to adapt the production to the specifications of ‘Pražská šunka’ TSG seems not taking into account the fact that the metal moulds can be re-used over a long period.
Poleg tega bi moralo biti v skladu s členom 43 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 in po analogiji z določbami, ki se uporabljajo za zaščitene označbe porekla in zaščitene geografske označbe, dovoljeno, da se blagovne znamke, ki so prijavljene, registrirane ali, če to predvideva zadevna zakonodaja, z uporabo v dobri veri potrjene na ozemlju Unije pred datumom vložitve zahtevka za zaščito pri Komisiji, še naprej uporabljajo ali obnovijo za zadevni proizvod ne glede na registracijo imena.
Fourth, in particular, the use of moulds is not compulsory, since alternatives are available.
Na blagovne znamke, ki so bile prijavljene, registrirane ali, če to predvideva zakonodaja Unije ali slovaška zakonodaja, potrjene z uporabo v dobri veri pred datumom vložitve zahtevka za registracijo imena „Pražská šunka“ kot ZTP pri Komisiji, ta registracija ne vpliva.
Plastic films may be used.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega okoliščine, ki jim ugovarja Slovaška glede zakonite, splošno znane in gospodarsko pomembne uporabe imena, tudi v blagovnih znamkah, na ozemlju Slovaške ne zadoščajo za utemeljitev zavrnitve češkega zahtevka za registracijo.
Besides, EUR 50/tonne of finished product for the purchase of film foil and manual work does not seem constitute a disproportionate cost to afford.
Kar zadeva ostale predloge Slovaške, po mnenju Komisije glede na navedene razloge ni primerno zagotoviti, da se registrirano ime ZTP „Pražská šunka“ dopolni s trditvijo „Izdelano po tradiciji Češke“, da bi se omogočilo trženje slovaške šunke „Pražská šunka“, ne da bi bila v skladu s specifikacijo proizvoda ZTP „Pražská šunka“, kot izhaja iz tradicije Slovaške.
In addition, pursuant to Article 43 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 and by analogy with the provisions applicable to Protected Designations of Origin and Protected Geographical Indications, trade marks which are applied for, registered, or established by use, if that possibility is provided for by the legislation concerned, in good faith within the territory of the Union, before the date on which the application for protection is submitted to the Commission, should be deemed to be allowed to continue to be used and renewed for that product notwithstanding the registration of the name.
Slovaška dejansko ni dokazala, da za proizvodnjo proizvoda, imenovanega „Pražská šunka“, obstaja druga, „slovaška tradicija“.
Trade marks which have been applied for, registered, or established by use, if that possibility is provided for by the Union or the Slovak legislation, in good faith before the date on which the application for registration of the name ‘Pražská šunka’ as TSG was submitted to the Commission are not affected by that registration.
Poleg tega specifikacija proizvoda, na katerega se bo nanašalo registrirano ime, po izvedbi dveh postopkov z ugovorom ne bo več izražala posebne „češke tradicije“, ampak zlasti tradicijo, ki si jo deli več držav članic EU in tretjih držav.
In the light of the above, the circumstances opposed by Slovakia as regards the lawful, renowned and economically significant use of the name, also in trade marks, in the territory of Slovakia are not sufficient to justify a rejection of the Czech application for registration.
Predlog za spremembo imena v „Tradicionalna Pražská šunka“ bi pomenil, da bi bilo treba postopek ponovno začeti od samega začetka, kar je nesorazmerno glede na legitimna pričakovanja.
As regards the remaining proposals made by Slovakia, in the light of the reasons set out above, the Commission considers that it is not appropriate to provide that the registered name ‘Pražská šunka’ TSG is accompanied by the claim ‘made following the tradition of the Czech Republic’ in order to allow the Slovak ‘Pražská šunka’ to be marketed, without complying with the product specification of ‘Pražská šunka’ TSG, as issued from the tradition of Slovakia.
Vsekakor bi bilo treba prilagoditi zaščito zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti ob upoštevanju interesov proizvajalcev in nosilcev dejavnosti, ki so doslej zakonito uporabljali taka imena.
In fact, Slovakia has not demonstrated that an alternative ‘Slovak tradition’ exists for the production of the product named ‘Pražská šunka’.
Na podlagi člena 15(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, ki se po analogiji uporablja tudi za zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti, bi bilo treba odobriti prehodno petletno obdobje, v katerem proizvajalci lahko uporabljajo ime „Pražská šunka“, ne da bi izpolnjevali specifikacijo proizvoda, v povezavi z dovoljenjem, da po preteku petletnega obdobja do porabe zalog še naprej dajejo na trg proizvode, ki ne ustrezajo specifikaciji proizvoda.
In addition, after two opposition procedures have been carried out, the product specification the registered name will refer to will no longer express a specific ‘Czech tradition’ but mainly a tradition shared among several EU Member States and third countries.
Tako se jim omogoči postopno prilagajanje na specifikacijo proizvoda.
The proposal to change the name into ‘Traditional Pražská šunka’ would imply that the procedure should be restarted from the very beginning, which is disproportionate when considering the legitimate expectations involved.
Vendar se taki proizvodi ne bi smeli tržiti, opremljeni z izrazom „zajamčena tradicionalna posebnost“, kratico „ZTP“ ali logotipom EU.
In any event, protection of traditional specialities guaranteed should be modulated taking into account the interests of producers and operators who have been lawfully using such names so far.
Glede na navedeno bi bilo treba imena „Пражка шунка“ (BG), „Jamón de Praga“ (ES), „Pražská šunka“ (CS/SK), „Prag Skinke“ (DA), „Prager Schinken“ (DE), „Praha sink“ (ET), „Χοιρομέρι Πράγας“ (EL), „Prague Ham“ (EN), „Jambon de Prague“ (FR), „Praška šunka“ (HR/SL/RS), „Prāgas šķiņķis“ (LV), „Prahos kumpis“ (LT), „Prágai minőségi sonka“ (HU), „Perżut ta' Praga“ (MT), „Praagse Ham“ (NL), „Szynka Praska“ (PL), „Fiambre de Praga“ (PT), „Jambon de Praga“ (RO), „Prahalainen kinkku“ (FI), „Pragskinka“ (SV), „Прашка шунка“ (RS) vpisati v register zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti.
On the basis of Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, applicable by analogy also to traditional specialities guaranteed, a transitional period of five years to use the name ‘Pražská šunka’ without complying with the product specification, combined with the authorisation to continue, after the five-year period has expired, to put on the market products not complying with the product specification until the stocks are exhausted, should be granted with the view to allowing progressive adaptation to the product specification.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za politiko kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov –
Such products should however not be marketed accompanied by the terms ‘traditional specialty guaranteed’, nor the abbreviation ‘TSG’ nor the EU logo.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
In the light of the above, the names ‘Пражка шунка’ (BG), ‘Jamón de Praga’ (ES), ‘Pražská šunka’ (CS/SK), ‘Prag Skinke’ (DA), ‘Prager Schinken’ (DE), ‘Praha sink’ (ET), ‘Χοιρομέρι Πράγας’ (EL), ‘Prague Ham’ (EN), ‘Jambon de Prague’ (FR), ‘Praška šunka’ (HR/SL/RS), ‘Prāgas šķiņķis’ (LV), ‘Prahos kumpis’ (LT), ‘Prágai minőségi sonka’ (HU), ‘Perżut ta' Praga’ (MT), ‘Praagse Ham’ (NL), ‘Szynka Praska’ (PL), ‘Fiambre de Praga’ (PT), ‘Jambon de Praga’ (RO), ‘Prahalainen kinkku’ (FI), ‘Pragskinka’ (SV) ‘Прашка шунка’ (RS) should be entered in the ‘register of traditional specialities guaranteed’.
Člen 1
Article 1
Prečiščena različica specifikacije proizvoda je v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
The names ‘Пражка шунка’ (BG), ‘Jamón de Praga’ (ES), ‘Pražská šunka’ (CS/SK), ‘Prag Skinke’ (DA), ‘Prager Schinken’ (DE), ‘Praha sink’ (ET), ‘Χοιρομέρι Πράγας’ (EL), ‘Prague Ham’ (EN), ‘Jambon de Prague’ (FR), ‘Praška šunka’ (HR/SL/RS), ‘Prāgas šķiņķis’ (LV), ‘Prahos kumpis’ (LT), ‘Prágai minőségi sonka’ (HU), ‘Perżut ta' Praga’ (MT), ‘Praagse Ham’ (NL), ‘Szynka Praska’ (PL), ‘Fiambre de Praga’ (PT), ‘Jambon de Praga’ (RO), ‘Prahalainen kinkku’ (FI), ‘Pragskinka’ (SV) ‘Прашка шунка’ (RS) are registered as TSG.
Člen 3
The names in the first paragraph identify a product from Class 1.2.
Registrirana imena se lahko za označevanje proizvodov, ki se tržijo na ozemlju EU in ne ustrezajo specifikaciji proizvoda za „Pražská šunka“ z oznako ZTP, uporabljajo pet let od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.) set out in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014.
Kadar se uporabljajo v zvezi s proizvodi, ki ne ustrezajo specifikaciji proizvoda, taka imena ne smejo biti opremljena z izrazom „zajamčena tradicionalna posebnost“, kratico „ZTP“ ali logotipom EU.
Article 2
Po izteku petletnega obdobja je dovoljeno trženje proizvodov z registriranim imenom, ki so bili proizvedeni pred koncem tega obdobja in ne izpolnjujejo specifikacije proizvoda iz člena 2, in sicer dokler se ne porabijo zaloge, ki so na datum izteka petletnega obdobja na ozemlju EU.
The consolidated product specification is set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Člen 4
The registered names may be used to designate products marketed in the EU territory and not complying with the product specification for ‘Pražská šunka’ TSG, for a period of five years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
When used with reference to products not complying with the product specification, such names may not be accompanied by the terms ‘traditional specialty guaranteed’, ‘TSG’ or by the EU logo.
V Bruslju, 26. marca 2018
After the expiration of the five years period, products bearing the registered name, made prior to the end of such period and not complying with the product specification referred to in Article 2 shall be authorised to be marketed until the stocks existing in the EU territory on the date that the five years period expires are exhausted.
Za Komisijo
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
UL L 343, 14.12.2012, str. 1.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
UL C 180, 19.5.2016, str. 5.
Done at Brussels, 26 March 2018.
UL C 283, 19.9.2012, str. 11.
For the Commission
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/304 z dne 2. marca 2016 o vpisu imena v register zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti (Heumilch/Haymilk/Latte fieno/Lait de foin/Leche de heno (ZTP)) (UL L 58, 4.3.2016, str. 28).
The President
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 z dne 13. junija 2014 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in živil (UL L 179, 19.6.2014, str. 36).
OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.
SPECIFIKACIJA PROIZVODA ZA ZAJAMČENO TRADICIONALNO POSEBNOST
OJ C 180, 19.5.2016, p. 5.
„PRAŽSKÁ ŠUNKA“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/304 of 2 March 2016 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Heumilch/Haymilk/Latte fieno/Lait de foin/Leche de heno (TSG)) (OJ L 58, 4.3.2016, p. 28).
ČEŠKA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
IME ZA REGISTRACIJO
ANNEX
‚Пражка шунка‘ (BG), ‚Jamón de Praga‘ (ES), ‚Pražská šunka‘ (CS/SK), ‚Prag Skinke‘ (DA), ‚Prager Schinken‘ (DE), ‚Praha sink‘ (ET), ‚Χοιρομέρι Πράγας‘ (EL), ‚Prague Ham‘ (EN), ‚Jambon de Prague‘ (FR), ‚Praška šunka‘ (HR/SL/RS), ‚Prāgas šķiņķis‘ (LV), ‚Prahos kumpis‘ (LT), ‚Prágai minőségi sonka‘ (HU), ‚Perżut ta' Praga‘ (MT), ‚Praagse Ham‘ (NL), ‚Szynka Praska‘ (PL), ‚Fiambre de Praga‘ (PT), ‚Jambon de Praga‘ (RO), ‚Prahalainen kinkku‘ (FI), ‚Pragskinka‘ (SV) „Прашка шунка“ (RS)
PRODUCT SPECIFICATION OF A TRADITIONAL SPECIALITY GUARANTEED
VRSTA PROIZVODA
‘PRAŽSKÁ ŠUNKA’
Skupina 1.2 Mesni proizvodi (kuhani, soljeni, dimljeni itn.)
EU No: CZ-TSG-0007-0061-21.10.2010
RAZLOGI ZA REGISTRACIJO
CZECH REPUBLIC
Gre za proizvod
NAME TO BE REGISTERED
☒ katerega način proizvodnje, predelava ali sestava ustreza tradicionalni praksi za zadevni proizvod ali živilo,
‘Пражка шунка’ (BG), ‘Jamón de Praga’ (ES), ‘Pražská šunka’ (CS/SK), ‘Prag Skinke’ (DA), ‘Prager Schinken’ (DE), ‘Praha sink’ (ET), ‘Χοιρομέρι Πράγας’ (EL), ‘Prague Ham’ (EN), ‘Jambon de Prague’ (FR), ‘Praška šunka’ (HR/SL/RS), ‘Prāgas šķiņķis’ (LV), ‘Prahos kumpis’ (LT), ‘Prágai minőségi sonka’ (HU), ‘Perżut ta' Praga’ (MT), ‘Praagse Ham’ (NL), ‘Szynka Praska’ (PL), ‘Fiambre de Praga’ (PT), ‘Jambon de Praga’ (RO), ‘Prahalainen kinkku’ (FI), ‘Pragskinka’ (SV) ‘Прашка шунка’ (RS)
☐ ki je proizveden iz surovin ali sestavin, ki se tradicionalno uporabljajo.
PRODUCT TYPE
Tradicionalni mesni proizvod „Pražská šunka“ je namenjen takojšnjemu uživanju in se že dolgo proizvaja v naslednjih različicah:
Class 1.2.
„Pražská šunka“ s kostjo,
Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)
„Pražská šunka“ brez kosti,
GROUNDS FOR THE REGISTRATION
konzervirana „Pražská šunka“.
Whether the product
Gre za ime
☒ results from a mode of production, processing or composition corresponding to traditional practice for that product or foodstuff;
☒ ki se tradicionalno uporablja za označevanje specifičnega proizvoda,
☐ is produced from raw materials or ingredients that are those traditionally used.
☐ ki opredeljuje tradicionalne ali posebne lastnosti proizvoda.
The traditional meat product ‘Pražská šunka’ is intended for direct consumption and has long been produced in the following variants:
Tradicionalno ime „Pražská šunka“ ne izraža posebnih lastnosti proizvoda in jih ne povezuje z njegovim izvorom ali kmetijskim poreklom, ampak je specifično samo po sebi, ker se na mednarodni ravni povezuje s priznanim mesnim proizvodom, ki ima značilno obliko in okus.
‘Pražská šunka’ on the bone;
OPIS
boneless ‘Pražská šunka’;
Opis proizvoda, za katerega se uporablja ime iz točke 1, vključno z njegovimi glavnimi fizikalnimi, kemijskimi, mikrobiološkimi ali organoleptičnimi značilnostmi, ki dokazujejo posebne lastnosti proizvoda (člen 7(2) te uredbe)
tinned ‘Pražská šunka’.
„Pražská šunka“ s kostjo