natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In assessing the ‘KZR INiG Syste’m, the Commission found that it covers adequately the sustainability criteria set out in Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC, as well as applies a mass balance methodology in accordance with the requirements of Article 7c(1) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 18(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Komisija je v oceni sistema „KZR INiG“ ugotovila, da ta ustrezno upošteva trajnostna merila iz direktiv 98/70/ES in 2009/28/ES ter uporablja metodo masne bilance v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 7c(1) Direktive 98/70/ES in člena 18(1) Direktive 2009/28/ES.
The assessment of the ‘KZR INiG System’ found that it meets adequate standards of reliability, transparency and independent auditing and also complies with the methodological requirements set out in Annex IV to Directive 98/70/EC and in Annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC.
V oceni sistema „KZR INiG“ je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjuje ustrezne standarde zanesljivosti, preglednosti in neodvisne revizije ter metodološke zahteve iz Priloge IV k Direktivi 98/70/ES in Priloge V k Direktivi 2009/28/ES.
The ‘KZR INiG System’ (‘the scheme’), submitted for recognition to the Commission on 11 August 2017, demonstrates that consignments of biofuels and bioliquids produced in accordance with the standards for the production of biofuels and bioliquids set in the scheme comply with the sustainability criteria laid down in Article 7b(3), (4) and (5) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 17(3), (4) and (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Sistem „KZR INiG“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistem), ki je bil Komisiji predložen v potrditev 11. avgusta 2017, dokazuje, da pošiljke biogoriv in tekočih biogoriv, proizvedenih v skladu s standardi za proizvodnjo biogoriv in tekočih biogoriv, ki so določeni v okviru sistema, izpolnjujejo trajnostna merila iz člena 7b(3), (4) in (5) Direktive 98/70/ES ter člena 17(3), (4) in (5) Direktive 2009/28/ES.
In the event that the contents of the scheme, as submitted for recognition to the Commission on 11 August 2017, change in a way that might affect the basis of this Decision, such changes shall be notified to the Commission without delay.
Če se vsebina tega sistema, kakor je bil Komisiji predložen v potrditev 11. avgusta 2017, spremeni na način, ki bi lahko vplival na podlago tega sklepa, se o takih spremembah nemudoma obvesti Komisija.
The Commission may repeal this Decision, inter alia, under the following circumstances:
Komisija lahko razveljavi ta sklep med drugim v naslednjih okoliščinah:
if it has been clearly demonstrated that the scheme has not implemented elements considered to be important for this Decision or if severe and structural breach of those elements has taken place;
če se jasno dokaže, da sistem ne izvaja elementov, ki veljajo za pomembne za ta sklep, ali če je prišlo do resne strukturne kršitve glede navedenih elementov;
if the scheme fails to implement standards of independent auditing specified in implementing acts referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 7c(5) of Directive 98/70/EC and the third subparagraph of Article 18(5) of Directive 2009/28/EC or improvements to other elements of the scheme considered to be important for a continued recognition.
če sistem ne uporablja standardov neodvisne revizije, določenih v izvedbenih aktih iz tretjega pododstavka člena 7c(5) Direktive 98/70/ES in tretjega pododstavka člena 18(5) Direktive 2009/28/ES, ali izboljšav drugih elementov sistema, ki veljajo za pomembne za nadaljnjo veljavnost potrditve.
It shall apply until 3 January 2024.
Uporablja se do 3. januarja 2024.
Done at Brussels, 13 December 2018.
V Bruslju, 13. decembra 2018
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1985
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2018/1985
not approving Willaertia magna c2c maky as an active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 11
o neodobritvi Willaertia magna c2c maky kot aktivne snovi za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih 11. vrste proizvodov
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products, and in particular Article 9(1)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2012 o dostopnosti na trgu in uporabi biocidnih proizvodov ter zlasti člena 9(1)(b) Uredbe,
The evaluating competent authority of France received on 17 March 2014 an application for the approval of the microorganism Willaertia magna c2c maky for use as an active substance in biocidal products of product-type 11, preservatives for liquid cooling and processing systems, as described in Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Francoski ocenjevalni pristojni organ je 17. marca 2014 prejel vlogo za odobritev mikroorganizma Willaertia magna c2c maky za uporabo kot aktivno snov v biocidnih proizvodih 11. vrste proizvodov („proizvodi za zaščito sistemov hladilnih tekočin in predelovalnih sistemov“), kot je opisana v Prilogi V k Uredbi (EU) št. 528/2012.
The evaluating competent authority of France submitted the assessment report together with its conclusions on 15 March 2017 in accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Navedeni organ je poročilo o oceni skupaj z ugotovitvami predložil 15. marca 2017 v skladu s členom 8(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
The opinion of the European Chemicals Agency was formulated on 26 April 2018 by the Biocidal Products Committee, having regard to the conclusions of the evaluating competent authority.
Odbor za biocidne proizvode je ob upoštevanju ugotovitev ocenjevalnega pristojnega organa 26. aprila 2018 oblikoval mnenje Evropske agencije za kemikalije.
According to that opinion, biocidal products of product-type 11 containing Willaertia magna c2c maky may not be expected to meet the criteria laid down in Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Iz navedenega mnenja je razvidno, da za biocidne proizvode 11. vrste proizvodov, ki vsebujejo mikroorganizem Willaertia magna c2c maky, ni mogoče pričakovati, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 19(1)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
In particular, the scenarios evaluated in the human health risk assessment identified unacceptable risks and no safe use could be identified.
Zlasti so scenariji, ocenjeni v oceni tveganja za zdravje ljudi, pokazali nesprejemljiva tveganja, varna uporaba pa ni bila ugotovljena.
Moreover, the innate efficacy of Willaertia magna c2c maky to control Legionella pneumophila was not sufficiently demonstrated.
Poleg tega ni bila v zadostni meri dokazana naravna učinkovitost mikroorganizma Willaertia magna c2c maky pri nadzoru bakterije Legionella pneumophila.
Taking into account the opinion of the European Chemicals Agency, the Commission considers it not appropriate to approve Willaertia magna c2c maky for use in biocidal products of product-type 11.
Komisija ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske agencije za kemikalije meni, da ni primerno odobriti mikroorganizma Willaertia magna c2c maky za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih 11. vrste proizvodov.
Willaertia magna c2c maky is not approved as an active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 11.
Willaertia magna c2c maky se ne odobri kot aktivna snov za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih 11. vrste proizvodov.
Biocidal Products Committee (BPC) Opinion on the application for approval of the active substance: Willaertia magna c2c maky, product-type 11, ECHA/BPC/206/2018, adopted on 26 April 2018.
Mnenje Odbora za biocidne proizvode o vlogi za odobritev aktivne snovi: Willaertia magna c2c maky, vrsta proizvoda: 11, ECHA/BPC/206/2018, sprejeto dne 26. aprila 2018.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1986
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2018/1986
establishing specific control and inspection programmes for certain fisheries and repealing Implementing Decisions 2012/807/EU, 2013/328/EU, 2013/305/EU and 2014/156/EU
o oblikovanju posebnih programov nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov za nekatere vrste ribolova ter o razveljavitvi izvedbenih sklepov Komisije 2012/807/EU, 2013/328/EU, 2013/305/EU in 2014/156/EU
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006, and in particular Article 95 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 z dne 20. novembra 2009 o vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema Unije za zagotavljanje skladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike, o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 847/96, (ES) št. 2371/2002, (ES) št. 811/2004, (ES) št. 768/2005, (ES) št. 2115/2005, (ES) št. 2166/2005, (ES) št. 388/2006, (ES) št. 509/2007, (ES) št. 676/2007, (ES) št. 1098/2007, (ES) št. 1300/2008, (ES) št. 1342/2008 in razveljavitvi uredb (EGS) št. 2847/93, (ES) št. 1627/94 in (ES) št. 1966/2006 ter zlasti člena 95 Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishes rules for the control of all activities covered by the common fisheries policy carried out on the territory of Member States or in Union waters or by Union fishing vessels or, without prejudice to the primary responsibility of the flag Member State, by nationals of Member States, and provides, in particular, that Member States shall ensure that control, inspection and enforcement are carried out on a non-discriminatory basis as regards sectors, vessels or persons, and on the basis of risk management.
Uredba (ES) št. 1224/2009 določa pravila o nadzoru za vse dejavnosti, zajete v skupni ribiški politiki, ki se izvajajo na ozemlju držav članic ali v vodah Unije ali ki jih izvajajo ribiška plovila Unije ali državljani držav članic, ne da bi to vplivalo na primarno odgovornost države zastave, pri čemer zlasti določa, da države članice zagotovijo, da se nadzor, inšpekcijski pregledi in izvrševanje izvajajo na nediskriminatorni podlagi, kar zadeva sektorje, plovila ali osebe, in na podlagi obvladovanja tveganja.
In accordance with Article 95 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, the Commission may, in concert with the Member States concerned, adopt specific control and inspection programmes for specific fisheries and sea basins.
V skladu s členom 95 Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009 lahko Komisija v dogovoru z zadevnimi državami članicami za posamezne vrste ribolova in morske bazene sprejme posebne programe nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov.
Specific control and inspection programmes have been adopted by the Commission for several sea basins and have been implemented by Members States through joint deployment plans, with the European Fisheries Control Agency (‘EFCA’) assuring operational coordination of inspection activities in this frame.
Komisija je za več morskih bazenov sprejela posebne programe nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov, ki jih izvajajo države članice prek načrtov skupne uporabe, operativno usklajevanje inšpekcijskih dejavnosti v tem okviru pa zagotavlja Evropska agencija za nadzor ribištva (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EFCA).
The recent Commission REFIT evaluation found that specific control and inspection programmes are an efficient and effective tool for improving cooperation and exchange of information among Member States.
V nedavni oceni, ki jo je v okviru programa REFIT izvedla Komisija, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so posebni programi nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov učinkovito in uspešno orodje za izboljšanje sodelovanja in izmenjave informacij med državami članicami.
Such programmes should also be provided for after that date to continue fostering cooperation and exchange of data among Member States, as well as to promote level playing field in inspection and control activities across the Union.
Treba bi bilo pregledati obveznost poročanja držav članic, da se zagotovi skladnost z novimi referenčni merili in čim bolj zmanjša upravno breme.
In order to simplify the adoption and ensure consistent implementation of the specific control and inspection programmes at Union level, those specific control and inspections programmes should be gathered in one single decision.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti med morskimi bazeni bi bilo treba pregledati tudi posebni program nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov, oblikovan z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2014/156/EU, vključno z referenčnimi merili in obveznostmi poročanja.
The reporting obligation of the Member States should be revised, with the objective to align them to the new benchmarks and to reduce as much as possible the administrative burden.
V skladu s členom 95(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009 morajo biti v posebnih programih nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov določeni področje uporabe, cilji, prednostne naloge in referenčna merila za inšpekcijske dejavnosti.
In order to ensure coherence across sea basins, the specific control and inspection programme established under Commission Implementing Decision 2014/156/EU should be also revised, including the benchmarks and reporting obligations.
Da bi se upoštevali nedavno sprejeti ukrepi Unije za ohranjanje in upravljanje ribolova, bi bilo treba področje uporabe posebnih programov nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov razširiti na nekatere dodatne staleže in vrste ribolova.
In accordance with Article 95(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 the specific control and inspection programmes should state the scope, objectives and priorities as well as benchmarks for inspection activities.
Področje uporabe bi moralo vključevati tudi rekreacijski ribolov staležev, ki so zajeti v ukrepih Unije za ohranjanje, in ribolov, ki ga upravljajo regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva.
In order to reflect recently adopted Union fisheries conservation and management measures, the scope of the specific control and inspections programmes should be extended to certain additional stocks and fisheries.
Poleg tega je treba prednostne naloge posebnih programov nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov uskladiti s prednostnimi nalogami skupne ribiške politike, zlasti kar zadeva izvajanje obveznosti iztovarjanja.
The scope should also include recreational fisheries for stocks covered by Union conservation measures and fisheries managed by Regional Fisheries Management Organisations.
Ta sklep bi moral zato zajemati nekatere vrste ribolova v Baltskem morju, Severnem morju, zahodnih vodah severovzhodnega Atlantika, vzhodnem Atlantiku, Sredozemskem morju in Črnem morju.
It is also necessary to align the priorities of the specific control and inspection programmes with those of the common fisheries policy, in particular as regards the implementation of the landing obligation.
Člen 95(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009 določa, da je treba referenčna merila za inšpekcijske dejavnosti v posebnih programih nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov oblikovati na podlagi obvladovanja tveganja.
This decision should therefore cover certain fisheries in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the Western Waters of North Eastern Atlantic, the Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean Sea and the Black Sea.
V ta namen ter za zagotovitev usklajenega pristopa k nadzoru in inšpekcijskim pregledom v posameznem morskem bazenu ter enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za ribištvo različnih držav članic, bi bilo treba uporabljati usklajeno metodologijo za oceno tveganja.
Article 95(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 provides that the specific control and inspection programme benchmarks for inspections activities are to be established on the basis of risk management.
Navedeno usklajeno metodologijo bi morale oblikovati države članice v sodelovanju z EFCA, temeljiti pa bi morala na morebitnih grožnjah neskladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike.
For this purpose, and in order to provide for a coherent approach to controls and inspections within a sea basin and a level playing field for fisheries of different Member States, a harmonised methodology for the risk assessment should be used.
Države članice bi morale sporočiti rezultate svojih ocen tveganja EFCA.
The harmonised methodology should be established by the Member States in cooperation with EFCA and should be based on possible threats of non-compliance with the rules of the common fishery policy.
EFCA bi morala te informacije uporabiti pri usklajevanju ocene tveganja na regionalni ravni.
Member States should communicate the results of their risk assessment to EFCA.
EFCA bi morala oblikovati regionalno strategijo obvladovanja tveganja, ki bi jo bilo treba izvajati prek načrta skupne uporabe, kot je opredeljen v členu 2(c) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 768/2005.
EFCA should use this information when coordinating the risk assessment at regional level.
V skladu s členom 95(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009 morajo države članice sprejeti potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovijo izvajanje posebnega programa nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov, zlasti kar zadeva potrebne človeške in materialne vire ter obdobja in območja njihove uporabe.
EFCA should establish a regional risk management strategy which shall be implemented through a joint deployment plan as defined in Article 2(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005.
Po potrebi bi bilo treba izvesti skupne dejavnosti nadzorovanja in inšpekcijskih pregledov v zadevnih državah članicah, in sicer v skladu z načrti skupne uporabe, ki jih določi EFCA, da se okrepi enotnost praks na področju nadzora, inšpekcijskih pregledov in nadzorovanja ter uskladijo dejavnosti nadzora, inšpekcijskih pregledov in nadzorovanja med pristojnimi organi zadevnih držav članic.
In accordance with Article 95(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 Member States should adopt the necessary measures to ensure the implementation of the specific control and inspection programme, particularly as regards the required human and material resources and the periods and zones where these are to be deployed.
Treba bi bilo določiti ciljna referenčna merila, ki določajo intenzivnost dejavnosti nadzorovanja in inšpekcijskih pregledov za ribiška plovila v segmentih flote z visoko in zelo visoko stopnjo tveganja v vseh zadevnih državah članicah.
Joint inspection and surveillance activities between the Member States concerned should be carried out, where applicable, in accordance with joint deployment plans established by the EFCA so as to enhance uniformity of control, inspection and surveillance practices and to coordinate control, inspection and surveillance activities between the competent authorities of those Member States.
Vsa ciljna referenčna merila bi bilo treba oceniti ob upoštevanju letnega vrednotenja, ki ga izvedejo države članice.
The target benchmarks determining the intensity of control and inspection activities should be set for the fishing vessels in the high and very high risk fleet segments in all concerned Member States.
Države članice bi morale imeti pravico do uporabe drugih ciljnih referenčnih meril, izraženih v obliki večje skladnosti.
All target benchmarks should be assessed taking into account the yearly evaluation performed by Member States.
Za izvajanje posebnih programov nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov, načrtov skupne uporabe ter skupnih dejavnosti inšpekcijskih pregledov in nadzorovanja je nujna izmenjava informacij med pristojnimi organi držav članic in z EFCA glede podatkov satelitskega sistema za spremljanje plovil, podatkov iz elektronskega sistema poročanja, vključno s poročili o ribolovni dejavnosti, predhodnega obveščanja, deklaracij o iztovarjanju in pretovarjanju ter obvestil o prodaji, podatkov o inšpekcijskih pregledih in nadzorovanju, vključno s poročili o inšpekcijskih pregledih, poročili opazovalcev in poročili o kršitvah, ter obdelave osebnih podatkov.
Member States should be entitled to use alternative target benchmarks expressed in terms of improved compliance levels.
Vedno in na vseh ravneh bi bilo treba zagotavljati upoštevanje obveznosti glede varstva osebnih podatkov iz uredb (EU) 2016/679 in (EU) 2018/1725 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter, če je to ustrezno, določb držav članic za prenos Direktive (EU) 2016/680 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v nacionalno zakonodajo.
Exchange of information between competent authorities of Member States and with EFCA concerning vessel monitoring system data, data from the electronic reporting system including fishing activity reports, prior notifications, landing and transhipment declarations and sales notes, inspection and surveillance data, including inspection and observer reports and infringement reports and the processing of personal data is necessary for implementation of the specific control and inspection programmes, joint deployment plans and joint inspection and surveillance activities.
Osebni podatki, ki se obdelujejo za namen izvajanja posebnih programov nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov, se ne bi smeli hraniti dlje kot deset let.
It should be ensured at all times and at all levels that the obligations on personal data protection laid down in Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and, where applicable, the provisions of the Member States transposing Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council are respected.
To obdobje bo pristojnim organom držav članic in EFCA omogočilo, da izpolnijo svoje obveznosti glede nadaljnjega spremljanja in ocenjevanja posebnih programov nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov ter poročanja o njih.
Personal data processed for the purpose of implementing the specific control and inspection programmes should not be stored for a period exceeding 10 years.
Kadar gre za podatke, ki so potrebni za izvedbo nadaljnjih postopkov v zvezi z inšpekcijskimi pregledi, na primer poizvedb, postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev ter sodnih ali upravnih postopkov, je potrebno posebno daljše, in sicer dvajsetletno obdobje hrambe, saj so takšni postopki dolgotrajni, navedeni podatki pa morajo biti na voljo za uporabo, dokler se ne zaključijo.
This period will allow the Member States competent authorities and EFCA to complete their duties concerning the follow-up, the reporting and evaluation of the specific control and inspection programmes.
Poleg tega bi moralo biti obdobje hrambe podaljšano, če se podatki uporabljajo v znanstvene namene in za zagotavljanje znanstvenega svetovanja, da se omogoči dolgoročno znanstveno spremljanje in ocenjevanje morskih bioloških virov.
As regards the data necessary for the follow-up of inspections such as enquiries, infringements, judicial or administrative proceedings, a specific longer retention period of 20 years is necessary due to the length of such processes and the need for those data to be used until the end of such processes.
Države članice bi morale pripraviti letna poročila o izvajanju posebnih programov nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov in jih poslati Komisiji.
In addition, where the data is used for scientific purposes and for providing scientific advice, the retention period should be extended to allow for the long-term scientific monitoring and assessment of marine biological resources.
Komisija bi morala ta poročila uporabiti za oceno izvajanja posebnih programov nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov ter vrednotenje njihove ustreznosti in učinkovitosti.
Member States should prepare and send to the Commission yearly reports on the implementation of the specific control and inspection programmes.
Tovrstna ocena bi lahko bila podlaga za pregled posebnih programov nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov.
The Commission should use these reports to assess the implementation of the specific control and inspection programmes and to evaluate, their adequacy and effectiveness.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za ribištvo in ribogojstvo –
Such assessment may serve as the basis for the review of the specific inspection and control programmes.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for fisheries and aquaculture,
Člen 1
Article 1
Ta sklep določa posebne programe nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov za: