natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 185/2013 concerning deductions from fishing quotas allocated to Spain for 2017 and 2018
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 185/2013 o odbitkih od ribolovnih kvot, dodeljenih Španiji za leti 2017 in 2018
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006, and in particular Article 105(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 z dne 20. novembra 2009 o vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema Skupnosti za zagotavljanje skladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike, o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 847/96, (ES) št. 2371/2002, (ES) št. 811/2004, (ES) št. 768/2005, (ES) št. 2115/2005, (ES) št. 2166/2005, (ES) št. 388/2006, (ES) št. 509/2007, (ES) št. 676/2007, (ES) št. 1098/2007, (ES) št. 1300/2008, (ES) št. 1342/2008 in razveljavitvi uredb (EGS) št. 2847/93, (ES) št. 1627/94 in (ES) št. 1966/2006 ter zlasti člena 105(4) Uredbe,
After consulting the Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,
po posvetovanju z Odborom za ribištvo in ribogojstvo,
In 2013 the Commission adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) No 185/2013.
Komisija je leta 2013 sprejela Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 185/2013.
This Regulation established deductions from mackerel quota in ICES division 8c, subareas 9 and 10; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 and from anchovy quota in ICES subarea 8.
Navedena uredba je določila odbitke od kvote za skušo v razdelku ICES 8c, podobmočjih 9 in 10 ter vodah Unije območja CECAF 34.1.1 in od kvote za sardona v podobmočju ICES 8.
Spain has requested to use those unfished quantities for deductions for 2017 and to decrease the deductions for 2018 accordingly.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za ribištvo in ribogojstvo –
The quantities established in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 185/2013 for deductions for 2017 and for 2018 should be adapted and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 185/2013 should therefore be modified.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Priloga k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 185/2013 se nadomesti s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
The Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 185/2013 is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.
Ta uredba začne veljati tretji dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 12. oktobra 2018
Done at Brussels, 12 October 2018.
Predsednik
The President
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 185/2013 z dne 5. marca 2013 o odbitkih od nekaterih ribolovnih kvot za skušo, dodeljenih Španiji za leto 2013 in naslednja leta, zaradi prelova v letu 2009 (UL L 62, 6.3.2013, str. 1).
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
PRILOGA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 185/2013 of 5 March 2013 providing for deductions from certain fishing quotas allocated to Spain in 2013 and subsequent years on account of overfishing of a certain mackerel quota in 2009 (OJ L 62, 6.3.2013, p. 1).
Stalež
ANNEX
Začetna kvota za leto 2009
Stock
Prilagojena kvota za leto 2009
Initial quota 2009
Ugotovljeni ulovi za leto 2009
Adapted quota 2009
Razlika med kvoto in ulovi (prelov)
Established catches 2009
Odbitek za leto 2013
Difference quota-catches (over-fishing)
Odbitek za leto 2014
Deduction 2013
Odbitek za leto 2015
Deduction 2014
Odbitek za leto 2016
Deduction 2015
Odbitek za leto 2017
Deduction 2016
Odbitek za leto 2018
Deduction 2017
Odbitek za leto 2019
Deduction 2018
Odbitek za leto 2020
Deduction 2019
Odbitek za leto 2021
Deduction 2020
Odbitek za leto 2022
Deduction 2021
Odbitek za leto 2023
Deduction 2022
Za sardona se leto razume kot sezona ribolova, ki se začne v navedenem letu.
Deduction 2023
Španija ni nalovila 739 ton iz kvote za skušo in 843 ton sardona iz zadevnih kvot v letu 2017, s čimer je zmanjšala ribolovni pritisk na navedene staleže v primerjavi z največjim pritiskom, dovoljenim v skladu z ribolovnimi možnostmi za leto 2017.
For anchovy, the year should be understood as the fishing season starting in that year.
Španija je zahtevala, da se navedene neulovljene količine uporabijo za odbitke za leto 2017 in da se odbitki za leto 2018 ustrezno znižajo.
Spain did not fish 739 tonnes of mackerel quota and 843 tonnes of anchovy from the respective quotas in 2017, thus exercising lower fishing pressure on those stocks compared to the maximum allowed in accordance with the fishing opportunities for 2017.
MAC8C 3 411
Council Regulation (EU) 2018/1541
Uredba Sveta (EU) 2018/1541
amending Regulations (EU) No 904/2010 and (EU) 2017/2454 as regards measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax
o spremembi uredb (EU) št. 904/2010 in (EU) 2017/2454 glede ukrepov za okrepitev upravnega sodelovanja na področju davka na dodano vrednost
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 113 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 113 Pogodbe,
The current system for the taxation of trade between Member States is based on transitional arrangements introduced in 1993 which have become outdated and prone to fraud in the context of a highly complex value added tax (VAT) system.
Sedanji sistem obdavčevanja trgovine med državami članicami temelji na prehodni ureditvi, uvedeni leta 1993, ki je postala zastarela in izpostavljena goljufijam v zelo zapletenem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost (DDV).
In October 2017, the Commission put forward a legislative proposal setting out the principles for a definitive VAT system for cross-border business-to-business trade between Member States that would be based on the taxation of cross-border supplies in the Member State of destination.
Komisija je oktobra 2017 predložila zakonodajni predlog, ki določa načela za dokončni sistem DDV za čezmejno trgovanje med podjetji med državami članicami, ki bi temeljil na obdavčitvi čezmejnih dobav v namembni državi članici.
Given the fact that it could take several years for the definitive VAT system for intra-Union trade to be fully implemented, short-term measures are needed to combat cross-border VAT fraud more effectively and in a more timely manner.
Ker lahko traja več let, preden se bo dokončni sistem DDV za trgovanje znotraj Unije v celoti izvajal, so potrebni kratkoročni ukrepi za učinkovitejši in bolj pravočasen boj proti čezmejnim goljufijam na področju DDV.
Improving and simplifying the administrative cooperation instruments, in particular Eurofisc, is also of significant importance in the fight against VAT fraud in general and to strengthen trust between tax authorities before the definitive VAT regime is introduced.
Izboljšanje in poenostavitev instrumentov za upravno sodelovanje, zlasti Eurofisca, sta prav tako bistvenega pomena v boju proti goljufijam na področju DDV na splošno in za krepitev zaupanja med davčnimi organi pred uvedbo dokončnega režima DDV.
Carrying out an administrative enquiry is often necessary to combat VAT fraud in particular when the taxable person is not established in the Member States where the tax is due.
Za boj proti goljufijam na področju DDV je pogosto potrebno izvajanje uradne preiskave, zlasti kadar davčni zavezanec nima sedeža v državah članicah, v katerih je treba plačati davek.
To ensure the proper enforcement of VAT and to avoid duplication of work and administrative burden of tax authorities and business, where at least two Member States consider that an administrative enquiry into the amounts declared by a taxable person not established on their territory but taxable therein is necessary, the Member State where the taxable person is established should undertake the enquiry unless it is able to provide the information requested.
Za zagotavljanje ustreznega izvrševanja DDV ter preprečevanje podvajanja dela in upravnih bremen davčnih organov in podjetij, kadar najmanj dve državi članici menita, da je potrebna uradna preiskava zneskov, ki jih izkaže davčni zavezanec, ki nima sedeža na njunem ozemlju, vendar je tam obdavčljiv, bi morala država članica, v kateri ima davčni zavezanec sedež, opraviti preiskavo, razen če zadevni zavezanec lahko zagotovi zahtevane informacije.
The requiring Member States should stand ready to assist the Member State of establishment by taking part actively in the enquiry.
Države članice, ki preiskavo zahtevajo, bi morale biti pripravljene državi članici sedeža pomagati z aktivnim sodelovanjem pri preiskavi.
As the officials of the requesting Member States might have better knowledge of the facts and circumstances of the case and where the requested Member State has not required officials from the requesting Member States the officials of the latter should be able to be present during the administrative enquiry in so far as conditions under national law of the requested Member State for such a presence are met.
Ker so uradniki držav članic prosilk morda bolje seznanjeni z dejstvi in okoliščinami primera in kadar zaprošena država članica ne zahteva uradnikov države članice prosilke, morajo uradniki slednje imeti možnost, da so prisotni pri upravni preiskavi, če so izpolnjeni pogoji za takšno prisotnost v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo zaprošene države članice.
In this occasion the officials of the requesting Member States should have access to the same premises and documents as the officials of the requested Member State through their intermediation.
Ob tej priložnosti bi morali imeti uradniki države članice prosilke dostop do istih prostorov in dokumentov kot uradniki zaprošene države članice na podlagi njihovega posredovanja.
Where the legislation of the requested Member State contains such conditions for providing the presence it should be assumed that the requested Member State shall undertake the necessary actions to satisfy these conditions.
Kadar zakonodaja zaprošene države članice vsebuje takšne pogoje za zagotavljanje prisotnosti, bi bilo treba predpostaviti, da bo zaprošena država članica sprejela potrebne ukrepe za izpolnitev teh pogojev.
In any case, officials from the requesting Member States should, where they deem it necessary, have the possibility to be present for consultation on the enquiry in the requested Member State with its officials after informing them.
Vsekakor pa bi morali imeti uradniki držav članic prosilk možnost biti prisotni, kadar bi se jim to zdelo potrebno, pri posvetovanjih o preiskavi v zaprošeni državi članici z uradniki te države članice, potem ko bi jih o tem obvestili.
The purpose of such consultation could be to exchange views and information about the development of the enquiry and to propose and discuss possible actions.
Uradniki bi na teh posvetovanjih lahko izmenjali informacije in mnenja o poteku preiskave ter predlagali možne ukrepe in o njih razpravljali.
Forwarding information without a prior request to the competent authorities of other Member States in accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 should be as simple and effective as possible.
Posredovanje informacij brez predhodne zahteve pristojnim organom drugih držav članic v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 904/2010 bi moralo biti čim bolj enostavno in učinkovito.
It is therefore necessary to allow competent authorities to forward information by means other than the standard forms when they deem other secure means more appropriate and agree to use them or when the information has been received from a third country.
Zato je treba pristojnim organom omogočiti, da informacije pošljejo na druge načine kot s standardnimi obrazci, kadar se jim zdijo ti varni načini bolj primerni in privolijo v njihovo uporabo ali kadar informacije prejmejo od tretje države.
The VAT exemption for the imports of goods provided for in Article 143(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (‘customs procedures 42 and 63’) is often abused and goods are diverted to the black market without VAT having been paid.
Oprostitev plačila DDV za uvoz blaga, določena v členu 143(2) Direktive Sveta 2006/112/ES (carinska postopka 42 in 63), se pogosto zlorabi in blago se preusmeri na črni trg, ne da bi bil plačan DDV.
It is therefore essential that customs officials, when checking whether the requirements for applying the exemption are met, have access to the registry of VAT identification numbers and the recapitulative statements.
Zato je bistvenega pomena, da imajo carinski uradniki, kadar preverjajo, ali so izpolnjene zahteve za uporabo oprostitve, dostop do registra identifikacijskih številk za DDV in rekapitulacijskih poročil.
Furthermore, the information collated by the customs authorities, as part of this procedure, should also be made available to the competent authorities of the Member State where the subsequent intra-Community acquisition should take place.
Poleg tega bi morale biti informacije, ki jih carinski organi pregledujejo v okviru tega postopka, na voljo tudi pristojnim organom države članice, v kateri bi se morala opraviti poznejša pridobitev blaga znotraj Skupnosti.
In order to tackle fraud arising from the dual VAT regime applicable to cars, Eurofisc liaison officials should be able to access vehicle registration data in an automated way.
Zaradi boja proti goljufijam, ki izhajajo iz dvojnega režima DDV, ki velja za vozila, bi morali imeti uradniki za zvezo Eurofisca avtomatičen dostop do podatkov iz registrov vozil.
It would allow them to identify swiftly who has committed the fraudulent transactions and where.
To bi jim omogočilo, da bi hitro ugotovili, kdo je izvedel goljufive transakcije in kje.
Such access should be made available via the European Vehicle and Driving Licence Information System (EUCARIS) software application, whose use is mandatory for Member States under Council Decisions 2008/615/JHA and 2008/616/JHA, as regards vehicle registration data.
Tak dostop bi moral biti na voljo prek programske aplikacije Evropski informacijski sistem za prometna in vozniška dovoljenja (EUCARIS), katerega uporaba je za države članice obvezna v skladu s sklepoma Sveta 2008/615/PNZ in 2008/616/PNZ glede podatkov iz registrov vozil.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the provisions on automated access to information collated by the customs authorities and to vehicle registration data, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Da bi zagotovili enotne pogoje za izvajanje določb o avtomatičnem dostopu do informacij, ki jih pregledujejo carinski organi, in do podatkov iz registrov vozil, bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti izvedbena pooblastila.
For the purpose of ensuring the effective and efficient monitoring of VAT on cross-border transactions, Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 provides for the presence of officials in administrative offices and during administrative enquiries in other Member States.
Uredba (EU) št. 904/2010 za namene zagotavljanja uspešnega in učinkovitega nadziranja DDV pri čezmejnih transakcijah določa prisotnost uradnikov v upravnih uradih in med uradnimi preiskavami v drugih državah članicah.
In order to strengthen the capacity of tax authorities to check cross-border supplies, there should be administrative enquiries carried out jointly enabling officials from two or more Member States to form a single team and actively take part in an administrative enquiry carried out jointly.
Za krepitev zmogljivosti davčnih organov za preverjanje čezmejnih dobav bi morale biti opravljene skupne uradne preiskave, ki bi uradnikom iz dveh ali več držav članic omogočile, da oblikujejo eno samo ekipo in dejavno sodelujejo v skupni uradni preiskavi.
In order to combat the most serious cross-border frauds, it is necessary to clarify and strengthen the governance, tasks and functioning of Eurofisc.
Za boj proti najhujšim čezmejnim goljufijam je treba pojasniti in okrepiti upravljanje, naloge in delovanje Eurofisca.
Eurofisc liaison officials should be able to access, exchange, process and analyse all necessary information swiftly and coordinate any follow-up actions.
Uradnikom za zvezo Eurofisca bi bilo treba omogočiti, da bi lahko hitro dostopali do vseh potrebnih informacij, jih izmenjevali, obdelovali in analizirali ter usklajevali morebitne nadaljnje ukrepe.
However, such coordination does not imply a right for requiring any specific enquiry actions from the participating Member State.
Vendar pa tako usklajevanje ne pomeni pravice, da se od sodelujoče države članice zahtevajo kakršni koli specifični preiskovalni ukrepi.
It is also necessary to strengthen the fight against VAT fraud at Union level, in particular by enabling Eurofisc working field coordinators to request targeted information from the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (‘Europol’) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (‘OLAF’).
Prav tako je treba okrepiti boj proti goljufijam na področju DDV na ravni Unije, zlasti tako, da se koordinatorjem za delovna področja Eurofisca omogoči, da od Agencije Evropske unije za sodelovanje na področju preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj (Europol) in Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) zahtevajo ciljne informacije.
Therefore, in order to receive relevant information in return held by Europol and OLAF, Eurofisc working field coordinators should be able to send as much information as necessary to Europol and OLAF.
Zato bi moralo biti koordinatorjem za delovna področja Eurofisca omogočeno, da Europolu in OLAF pošljejo toliko informacij, kot je potrebno, da v zameno od obeh pridobijo relevantne informacije.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the provisions on Eurofisc, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Da bi zagotovili enotne pogoje za izvajanje določb o Eurofiscu, bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti izvedbena pooblastila.
Organising the forwarding of requests for VAT refunds pursuant to Article 5 of Council Directive 2008/9/EC offers an opportunity to reduce the administrative burden for the competent authorities to recover unpaid tax liabilities in the Member State of establishment.
Z organiziranjem posredovanja zahtevkov za vračilo DDV v skladu s členom 5 Direktive Sveta 2008/9/ES je mogoče zmanjšati upravna bremena pristojnih organov pri izterjavi neplačanih davčnih obveznosti v državi članici sedeža.
Member States may also communicate to OLAF relevant information where they consider it appropriate.
Države članice lahko OLAF tudi sporočijo relevantne informacije, kadar menijo, da je to primerno.
This would enable OLAF to fulfil its mandate to carry out administrative investigations into fraud, corruption and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, and to provide assistance to the Member States in order to coordinate their action to protect the financial interests of the Union against fraud.
To bi OLAF omogočilo izpolnjevati njegove naloge izvajanja upravnih preiskav goljufij, korupcije in drugih nezakonitih dejavnosti, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, in zagotavljati pomoč državam članicam pri usklajevanju njihovega delovanja za zaščito finančnih interesov Unije pred goljufijami.
The Commission may have access to the information communicated or collected pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 only in so far as it is necessary for care, maintenance and development of the electronic systems hosted by the Commission and used by the Member States for the purpose of this Regulation.
Komisija ima lahko dostop do informacij, sporočenih ali zbranih v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 904/2010, samo, kolikor je to potrebno za oskrbo, vzdrževanje in razvoj elektronskih sistemov, ki jih gosti Komisija in ki jih uporabljajo države članice za namene te uredbe.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies to the processing of personal data for the purpose of Regulation (EU) No 904/2010.
Za obdelavo osebnih podatkov za namen Uredbe (EU) št. 904/2010 se uporablja Uredba (EU) 2016/679 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions and bodies for the purpose of that Regulation.
Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta se uporablja za obdelavo osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Unije za namene navedene uredbe.
The fight against VAT fraud is recognised as an important objective of general public interest of both the Union and its Member States.
Boj proti goljufijam na področju DDV velja za pomemben cilj, ki je v splošnem javnem interesu tako Unije kot njenih držav članic.
For the purposes of achieving the objectives of Regulation (EU) No 904/2010, namely the objective to cooperate and to exchange information that helps to effect a correct assessment of VAT, to monitor correct application of VAT, particularly on intra-Community transactions, and to combat VAT fraud, it is appropriate to provide for specific and limited restrictions on certain rights and obligations laid down by Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Za namene doseganja ciljev Uredbe (EU) št. 904/2010, tj. ciljev sodelovanja in izmenjave informacij, ki omogočajo pravilno odmero DDV, spremljanja pravilne uporabe DDV, predvsem pri transakcijah znotraj Skupnosti, in boja proti goljufijam na področju DDV, je primerno določiti specifične in prilagojene omejitve nekaterih pravic in obveznosti, določenih v Uredbi (EU) 2016/679.
More specifically, full application of the rights and obligations foreseen in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 would seriously undermine the effectiveness of the fight against VAT fraud as it would in particular allow the data subjects to obstruct ongoing investigations and risk profiling.
Natančneje, dosledna uporaba pravic in obveznosti, določenih v Uredbi (EU) 2016/679, bi resno ogrozila učinkovitost boja proti goljufijam na področju DDV, saj bi posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, zlasti omogočila oviranje preiskav v teku, pa tudi ugotavljanja tveganja.
This would jeopardise official or legal enquiries, analyses, investigations or procedures that are carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 904/2010.
To bi ogrozilo uradne ali sodne poizvedbe, analize, preiskovanje ali postopke, ki se izvajajo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 904/2010.
It would also disable the administrative cooperation between the competent authorities which is a key instrument for the purpose of combating VAT fraud.
Onemogočilo bi tudi upravno sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi, kar je ključni instrument boja proti goljufijam na področju DDV.
Consequently, restrictions should be provided as regards the right for transparent information, the right to receive information where personal data are collected from the data subject, the right to receive information where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject, the right of access by the data subject, the right to erasure, the right to object to processing of personal data and the right concerning automated individual decision-making, including profiling.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti omejitve pravice do preglednih informacij, pravice do prejemanja informacij, kadar so osebni podatki pridobljeni od posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, pravice do prejemanja informacij, kadar osebni podatki niso bili pridobljeni od posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, pravice dostopa posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, pravice do izbrisa, pravice do ugovora obdelavi osebnih podatkov in pravice v zvezi z avtomatiziranim sprejemanjem posameznih odločitev, vključno s profiliranjem.
Exercise of these rights should be restricted only as long as it is necessary in order not to undermine the purposes pursued under Article 1 of Regulation (EU) No 904/2010.
Uveljavljanje teh pravic bi moralo biti omejeno samo toliko časa, kot je potrebno, da se ne ogrozijo cilji, ki se zasledujejo na podlagi člena 1 Uredbe (EU) št. 904/2010.