natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to settled case-law, purely economic reasons, namely promoting the national economy to the detriment of the fundamental freedoms, as well as purely administrative reasons, such as carrying out controls or gathering statistics, cannot constitute an overriding reason in the public interest.
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso izključno gospodarski razlogi, kot so spodbujanje nacionalnega gospodarstva v škodo temeljnih svoboščin, in izključno upravni razlogi, kot je izvajanje kontrol ali zbiranje statističnih podatkov, ne morejo biti pomembni razlogi v javnem interesu.
It is for the Member States to determine the level of protection which they wish to afford to the public interest objectives and the appropriate level of regulation, within the limits of proportionality.
Države članice določijo stopnjo zaščite, ki jo želijo zagotoviti ciljem javnega interesa, ter ustrezno raven regulacije v mejah sorazmernosti.
The fact that one Member State imposes less strict rules than another Member State does not mean that the latter Member State’s rules are disproportionate and therefore incompatible with Union law.
Če ena država članica uvede manj stroge predpise kot druga, to ne pomeni, da so predpisi te druge države članice nesorazmerni in zato nezdružljivi s pravom Unije.
With regard to the protection of public health, according to Article 168(1) TFEU, a high level of human health protection is to be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Union policies and activities.
V zvezi z zaščito javnega zdravja v skladu s členom 168(1) PDEU je treba pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju vseh politik in dejavnosti Unije zagotoviti visoko raven varovanja zdravja ljudi.
This Directive is fully in line with that objective.
Ta direktiva je v celoti v skladu z navedenim ciljem.
In order to ensure that the provisions they introduce, and that amendments they make to existing provisions, are proportionate, Member States should consider the criteria for assessing the proportionality and the additional criteria which are relevant for the regulated profession being analysed.
Da bi zagotovili, da so določbe, ki jih uvajajo, in spremembe obstoječih določb sorazmerne, bi države članice morale upoštevati merila za oceno sorazmernosti ter dodatna merila, ki so pomembna za regulirani poklic, ki se analizira.
Where a Member State intends to regulate a profession or to amend existing rules, account should be taken of the nature of the risks related to the public interest objectives pursued, in particular the risks to service recipients, including consumers, to professionals or to third parties.
Kadar namerava država članica regulirati poklic ali spremeniti obstoječa pravila, bi bilo treba upoštevati naravo tveganj, povezanih z zastavljenimi cilji javnega interesa, zlasti tveganj za prejemnike storitev, vključno s potrošniki, strokovnjaki ali tretjimi osebami.
It should also be borne in mind that, in the field of professional services, there is usually an asymmetry of information between consumers and professionals, given that professionals display a high level of technical knowledge which consumers may not have.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba tudi, da na področju poklicnih storitev običajno nastane asimetrija informacij med potrošniki in strokovnjaki, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da imajo strokovnjaki visoko stopnjo strokovnega znanja, ki ga potrošniki morda nimajo.
Requirements linked to professional qualifications should be considered to be necessary only where existing measures, such as product safety law or consumer protection law, cannot be regarded as being suitable or genuinely effective to achieve the aim pursued.
Zahteve, povezane s poklicnimi kvalifikacijami, bi se morale za potrebne šteti le, kadar obstoječih ukrepov, kot je pravo o varnosti proizvodov ali pravo o varstvu potrošnikov, ni mogoče šteti za ustrezne ali dejansko učinkovite za uresničevanje zastavljenega cilja.
To meet the requirement of proportionality, a measure should be suitable for securing the attainment of the objective pursued.
Da bi izpolnili zahtevo glede sorazmernosti, bi moral biti ukrep primeren za zagotovitev uresničitve zastavljenega cilja.
A measure should be considered to be suitable for securing the attainment of the objective pursued only if it genuinely reflects a concern to attain that objective in a consistent and systematic manner, for instance where similar risks related to certain activities are addressed in a comparable way and where any exceptions to the restrictions involved are applied in line with the stated objective.
Ukrep bi se za primernega za zagotovitev uresničitve zastavljenega cilja smel šteti le, če resnično zagotavlja dosledno in sistematično uresničevanje tega cilja, na primer kadar se podobna tveganja, povezana z nekaterimi dejavnostmi, primerljivo obravnavajo in kadar se izjeme v zvezi z zadevnimi omejitvami uporabljajo v skladu z navedenim ciljem.
Furthermore, the national measure should effectively contribute to achieving the objective pursued and therefore, where it has no effect on the ground for justification, it should not be considered to be suitable.
Poleg tega bi moral nacionalni ukrep dejansko prispevati k uresničitvi zastavljenega cilja, zato se ne bi smel šteti za primernega, kadar ne vpliva na razlog za utemeljitev.
The overall impact of the measure on the free movement of persons and services within the Union, on consumer choice and on the quality of the service provided should be duly taken into account by the Member States.
Države članice bi morale ustrezno upoštevati skupni učinek ukrepa na prosti pretok oseb in storitev v Uniji, na izbiro potrošnikov in kakovost ponujenih storitev.
On that basis, Member States should ascertain, in particular, whether the extent of the restriction to access to, or the pursuit of, regulated professions is proportionate to the importance of the objectives pursued and the expected gains.
Države članice bi morale na tej podlagi ugotoviti zlasti, ali je obseg omejitve za dostop do ali opravljanje reguliranih poklicev sorazmeren s pomembnostjo zastavljenih ciljev in pričakovanih koristi.
Member States should carry out a comparison between the national measure at issue and alternative, less restrictive means that would result in the same objective being attained but would impose fewer restrictions.
Države članice bi morale izvesti primerjavo med zadevnim nacionalnim ukrepom in nadomestno možnostjo ter manj omejevalnimi načini, ki bi omogočili uresničitev istega cilja, vendar z manj omejitvami.
Where the measures are justified by consumer protection only and where the risks identified are limited to the relationship between the professional and the consumer and therefore do not negatively affect third parties, Member States should assess whether their objective could be attained by means that are less restrictive than reserving activities to professionals.
Kadar so ukrepi utemeljeni samo z varstvom potrošnikov ter kadar so opredeljena tveganja omejena na razmerje med strokovnjakom in potrošnikom in zato ne vplivajo negativno na tretje osebe, bi morale države članice oceniti, ali bi se njihov cilj lahko uresničil na manj omejevalen način, kot je to rezervacija dejavnosti za strokovnjake.
For instance, where consumers can reasonably make a choice between using the services of qualified professionals or not, less restrictive means, such as protection of the professional title or enrolment on a professional register, should be used.
Na primer, kadar potrošniki lahko razumno izbirajo, ali bodo oziroma ne bodo uporabljali storitve kvalificiranih strokovnjakov, bi bilo treba uporabiti manj omejevalne načine, kot je to zaščita poklicnega naziva ali vpis v poklicni register.
Regulation by way of reserved activities and protected professional title should be considered where the measures aim to prevent a risk of serious harm to public interest objectives, such as public health.
O regulaciji z rezerviranimi dejavnostmi in zaščitenim strokovnim nazivom bi bilo treba razmisliti, kadar je cilj ukrepov preprečiti resno škodo za cilje javnega interesa, kot je javno zdravje.
Where relevant in view of the nature and the content of the measure being analysed, Member States should also take the following elements into account: the connection between the scope of professional activities covered by a profession and the professional qualification required; the complexity of the tasks in particular as regards the level, the nature and the duration of the training or experience required; the existence of different routes to obtain the professional qualification; whether the activities reserved to certain professionals can be shared with other professionals; and the degree of autonomy in exercising a regulated profession in particular where the activities relating to a regulated profession are pursued under the control and responsibility of a duly qualified professional.
Kadar je to ustrezno glede na naravo in vsebino ukrepa, ki se analizira, bi morale države članice upoštevati tudi naslednje elemente: povezavo med obsegom poklicnih dejavnosti, ki jih zajema poklic in zahtevano poklicno kvalifikacijo; zahtevnost nalog, zlasti kar zadeva raven, naravo in trajanje zahtevanega usposabljanja ali izkušenj; obstoj različnih načinov za pridobitev zadevne poklicne kvalifikacije; ali lahko dejavnosti, ki so rezervirane za nekatere strokovnjake, opravljajo tudi drugi strokovnjaki; ter stopnjo avtonomnosti pri opravljanju reguliranega poklica, zlasti kadar se dejavnosti, povezane z reguliranim poklicem, izvajajo pod nadzorom in odgovornostjo ustrezno kvalificiranega strokovnjaka.
This Directive takes account of scientific and technological progress, and contributes to the proper functioning of the internal market, including in the digital environment.
Ta direktiva upošteva znanstveni in tehnološki napredek ter prispeva k pravilnemu delovanju notranjega trga, tudi v digitalnem okolju.
In view of the speed of technological change and scientific developments, updates in access requirements could be of particular importance for a number of professions, especially for professional services provided by electronic means.
Zaradi hitrih tehnoloških sprememb in znanstvenega razvoja bi lahko bile posodobitve zahtev glede začetka opravljanja zelo pomembne za številne poklice, zlasti za strokovne storitve, ki se zagotavljajo z elektronskimi sredstvi.
Where a Member State regulates a profession, account should be taken of the fact that scientific and technological developments could reduce or increase the asymmetry of information between professionals and consumers.
Kadar država članica regulira poklic, bi bilo treba upoštevati, da bi lahko znanstveni in tehnološki razvoj zmanjšal ali povečal asimetrijo informacij med strokovnjaki in potrošniki.
Where the scientific and technological developments carry a high risk to the public interest objectives, it is for the Member States, where necessary, to encourage professionals to keep up with those developments.
Kadar znanstveni in tehnološki razvoj zelo ogroža cilje javnega interesa, je na državah članicah, da po potrebi spodbujajo strokovnjake, da ostanejo v koraku s tem razvojem.
Member States should carry out a comprehensive assessment of the circumstances in which the measure is adopted and implemented and examine in particular the effect of the new or amended provisions when combined with other requirements restricting access to, or the pursuit of, the profession.
Države članice bi morale izvesti celovito presojo okoliščin, v katerih se ukrep sprejme in izvaja, ter preučiti zlasti učinek novih ali spremenjenih zakonov ali drugih predpisov v povezavi z drugimi zahtevami, ki omejujejo dostop do ali opravljanje poklica.
The taking-up and pursuit of certain activities may be conditional on complying with several requirements such as rules relating to the organisation of the profession, compulsory membership of a professional organisation or body, professional ethics, supervision and liability.
Pogoj za začetek opravljanja in opravljanje nekaterih dejavnosti je lahko pogojen s številnimi zahtevami, kot so pravila glede organizacije poklica, obveznega članstva v poklicni organizaciji ali strokovnem združenju, poklicne etike, nadzora in odgovornosti.
Therefore, when assessing the effect of the new or amended provisions, Member States should take into account the existing requirements, including continuous professional development, compulsory membership of a professional organisation or body, registration or authorisation schemes, quantitative restrictions, specific legal form requirements and shareholding requirements, territorial restrictions, multidisciplinary restrictions and incompatibility rules, requirements concerning insurance cover, language knowledge requirements, to the extent necessary to practise the profession, fixed minimum and/or maximum tariff requirements, and requirements on advertising.
Zato bi morale države članice pri ocenjevanju učinkov novih ali spremenjenih zakonov ali drugih predpisov upoštevati obstoječe zahteve, tudi stalni poklicni razvoj, obvezno članstvo v poklicni organizaciji ali strokovnem združenju, sisteme registracij ali dovoljenj, kvantitativne omejitve, posebne zahteve glede pravne oblike in lastniškega deleža, ozemeljske omejitve, večdisciplinarne omejitve in pravila glede nezdružljivosti, zahteve glede zavarovalnega kritja, glede znanja jezika v obsegu, potrebnem za opravljanje poklica, glede določenih najnižjih in/ali najvišjih tarif ter zahteve glede oglaševanja.
The introduction of additional requirements may be suitable to attain the public interest objectives.
Uvedba dodatnih zahtev je lahko primerna za doseganje ciljev v splošnem interesu.
The mere fact that their individual or combined effect should be assessed does not mean that those requirements are prima facie disproportionate.
Zgolj dejstvo, da bi bilo treba oceniti njihov posamezni ali skupni učinek, še ne pomeni, da so te zahteve nesorazmerne prima facie.
For example, the obligation to undergo continuous professional development may be suitable to ensure that professionals keep abreast of developments in their respective areas, as long as it does not lay down discriminatory and disproportionate conditions to the detriment of new entrants.
Tako je na primer lahko obveznost stalnega poklicnega izpopolnjevanja primerna za zagotovitev, da so delavci na tekočem z razvojem na svojih področjih, dokler ne določa diskriminatornih in nesorazmernih pogojev v škodo novim udeležencem na trgu.
Likewise, compulsory membership of a professional organisation or body may be considered appropriate where those professional organisations or bodies are entrusted by the State with safeguarding the relevant public interest objectives, for example in supervising the legitimate practice of the profession, or organising or supervising continuous professional training.
Prav tako bi lahko bilo primerno obvezno članstvo v poklicni organizaciji ali strokovnem združenju, kadar država tem poklicnim organizacijam ali strokovnim združenjem zaupa zaščito pomembnih ciljev javnega interesa, na primer pri nadzoru zakonitega opravljanja poklica ali organizaciji ali nadzoru stalnega poklicnega usposabljanja.
Where the independence of a profession cannot be adequately guaranteed by other means, Member States could consider the application of safeguards, such as limiting the shareholding of persons outside the profession or providing that the majority of the voting rights are to be held by persons practising the profession, as long as such safeguards do not go beyond what is necessary in order to protect the public interest objective.
Kadar neodvisnosti poklica ni mogoče ustrezno zagotoviti z drugimi sredstvi, bi lahko države članice preučile uporabo zaščitnih ukrepov, na primer omejevanje poslovnega deleža oseb, ki niso v tem poklicu, ali z določbo, da mora biti večina glasovalnih pravic v lasti oseb, ki opravljajo ta poklic, če ti zaščitni ukrepi ne presegajo tistega, kar je potrebno za zaščito javnega interesa.
Member States could consider establishing fixed minimum and/or maximum tariff requirements with which the service providers must comply, especially for services where this is necessary for the effective application of the principle of reimbursing costs, as long as such restriction is proportionate and, where necessary, derogations from the minimum and/or maximum tariffs are provided for.
Države članice bi lahko preučile možnost uvedbe določenih najnižjih in/ali najvišjih tarifnih zahtev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati ponudniki storitev, zlasti za storitve, pri katerih je to potrebno zaradi učinkovite uporabe načela povračila stroškov, če je taka omejitev sorazmerna in če so po potrebi določena odstopanja od najnižje in/ali najvišje tarife.
Where the introduction of additional requirements duplicates requirements which have already been introduced by a Member State in the context of other rules or procedures, such requirements cannot be regarded as proportionate to achieve the objective pursued.
Kadar uvedba dodatnih zahtev podvaja zahteve, ki jih je že uvedla država članica v okviru drugih pravil ali postopkov, teh zahtev ni mogoče šteti kot sorazmerne za uresničitev zastavljenega cilja.
Under Title II of Directive 2005/36/EC, Member States cannot impose on service providers established in another Member State providing professional services on a temporary and occasional basis requirements or restrictions prohibited in that Directive, such as authorisation by, registration with, or membership of, a professional organisation or body or having representatives on the territory of the host Member State for the purposes of having access to, or the pursuit of, a regulated profession.
Na podlagi naslova II Direktive 2005/36/ES države članice ne morejo za ponudnike storitev, ustanovljenih v drugi državi članici, ki zagotavljajo opravljanje storitev začasno in občasno, uvesti omejitev ali zahtev, prepovedanih v navedeni direktivi, kot so odobritev, registracija ali članstvo v poklicni organizaciji ali strokovnem združenju oziroma navzočnost zastopnikov na ozemlju države članice gostiteljice za namene začetka opravljanja ali opravljanje reguliranih poklicev.
Member States can, where necessary, require service providers wishing to provide services on a temporary basis, to provide information in the form of a written declaration to be made in advance of the first service provision and to renew this declaration on a yearly basis.
Države članice lahko po potrebi zahtevajo, da ponudniki storitev, ki želijo opravljati storitve začasno, predložijo informacije s pisno izjavo, ki jo je treba vložiti pred prvim opravljanjem storitev in jo vsako leto obnoviti.
Therefore, in order to facilitate the provision of professional services, it is necessary to reiterate, taking into account the temporary or occasional nature of the service, that requirements, such as automatic temporary registration or pro forma membership of a professional organisation or body, prior declarations and document requirements, as well as the payment of a fee or any charges, should be proportionate.
Zato, da se olajša izvajanje strokovnih storitev, je treba ponovno poudariti, ob upoštevanju začasne ali občasne narave storitev, da bi morale biti zahteve, kot so avtomatska začasna registracija ali formalno članstvo v poklicni organizaciji ali strokovnem združenju, predhodne izjave in zahteve glede dokumentov ter plačilo pristojbine ali stroškov, sorazmerne.
These requirements should not lead to a disproportionate burden on service providers nor should they hinder or render less attractive the exercise of the freedom to provide services.
Te zahteve ne bi smele nesorazmerno obremeniti ponudnikov storitev ali ovirati oziroma zmanjševati privlačnosti uresničevanja svobode opravljanja storitev.
Member States should, in particular, assess whether the requirement to provide certain information and documents in accordance with Directive 2005/36/EC and the possibility of obtaining further details by way of administrative cooperation between Member States through the Internal Market Information System are proportionate and are sufficient to prevent a serious risk of circumvention of the applicable rules by service providers.
Države članice bi morale zlasti oceniti, ali sta zahteva po zagotavljanju nekaterih informacij in dokumentov v skladu z Direktivo 2005/36/ES in možnost, da se z upravnim sodelovanjem med državami članicami prek informacijskega sistema za notranji trg pridobijo dodatne podrobnosti, sorazmerni in zadostujeta, da se prepreči resno tveganje, da bodo ponudniki storitev zaobšli veljavna pravila.
This Directive should however not apply to measures designed to ensure compliance with applicable employment terms and conditions.
Vendar se ta direktiva ne bi smela uporabljati za ukrepe, katerih namen je zagotoviti spoštovanje veljavnih pogojev za zaposlovanje.
As confirmed by settled case-law, the health and life of humans ranks foremost among the interests protected by the TFEU.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso Sodišča sta zdravje in življenje ljudi na prvem mestu med interesi, ki jih ščiti PDEU.
Consequently, Member States should duly take account of the objective of ensuring a high level of human health protection when assessing requirements for healthcare professions, such as reserved activities, protected professional title, continuous professional development or rules relating to the organisation of the profession, professional ethics and supervision, while respecting the minimum training conditions, laid down in Directive 2005/36/EC.
Zato bi morale države članice ustrezno upoštevati cilj zagotavljanja visoke ravni varovanja zdravja ljudi pri presoji zahtev za zdravstvene poklice, kot so rezervirane dejavnosti, zaščiten poklicni naziv, stalen strokovni razvoj ali pravila v zvezi z organizacijo poklica, poklicno etiko in nadzorom, ob spoštovanju minimalnih pogojev usposobljenosti, določenih v Direktivi 2005/36/ES.
Member States should in particular ensure that the regulation of healthcare professions, having public health and patient safety implications, is proportionate and contributes to the guaranteeing of access to healthcare, recognised as a fundamental right in the Charter, as well as to safe, high quality and efficient healthcare for citizens on their territory.
Države članice bi morale zlasti zagotoviti, da je regulacija zdravstvenih poklicev, ki ima posledice za javno zdravje in varnost bolnikov, sorazmerna in prispeva k zagotavljanju dostopa do zdravstvenega varstva, ki se v Listini priznava kot temeljna pravica, in zlasti dostopa do varnega, kakovostnega in učinkovitega zdravstvenega varstva državljanov na njihovem ozemlju.
In establishing policies for healthcare services, account should be taken of the need to ensure accessibility, a high quality of service, and an adequate and safe supply of medicinal products, in accordance with the public health needs in the territory of the Member State concerned, as well as of the need to ensure the professional independence of healthcare professionals.
Pri oblikovanju politik za zdravstvene storitve bi bilo treba upoštevati, da je treba zagotoviti dostopnost, visoko kakovost storitve ter ustrezno in varno dobavo zdravil v skladu s potrebami javnega zdravja na ozemlju zadevne države članice ter potrebo po zagotovitvi strokovne neodvisnosti zdravstvenih delavcev.
With regard to the justification for the regulation of healthcare professions, Member States should take into account the objective of ensuring a high level of human health protection, including accessibility and high quality of healthcare for citizens, and adequate and safe supply of medicinal products, taking into consideration the margin of discretion referred to in Article 1 of this Directive.
Glede utemeljenosti regulacije zdravstvenih poklicev bi morale države članice upoštevati cilj zagotavljanja visoke ravni varovanja zdravja ljudi, vključno z dostopnostjo in visoko kakovostjo zdravstvenega varstva za državljane, ter ustrezno in varno oskrbo z zdravili, ob upoštevanju diskrecijske pravice iz člena 1 te direktive.