natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In such cases, Eurojust should act at the request of the non-participating Member States or at the request of the EPPO.
V teh zadevah bi moral Eurojust ukrepati na zahtevo nesodelujočih držav članic ali EJT.
Eurojust should in any case remain competent for offences affecting the financial interests of the Union whenever the EPPO is not competent or where, although the EPPO is competent, it does not exercise its competence.
Eurojust bi moral v vsakem primeru ostati pristojen za kazniva dejanja, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, kadar EJT zanje ni pristojen ali pa svoje pristojnosti, čeprav jo ima, ne izvaja.
The Members States which do not participate in enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO may continue to request Eurojust’s support in all cases regarding offences affecting the financial interests of the Union.
Države članice, ki niso vključene v okrepljeno sodelovanje za ustanovitev EJT, lahko Eurojust še naprej zaprosijo za podporo v vseh zadevah v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije.
The EPPO and Eurojust should develop close operational cooperation in line with their respective mandates.
EJT in Eurojust bi morala razviti tesno operativno sodelovanje v skladu s svojima mandatoma.
In order for Eurojust to fulfil its mission and develop its full potential in the fight against serious cross-border crime, its operational functions should be strengthened by reducing the administrative workload of national members, and its European dimension enhanced through the Commission’s participation in the Executive Board and the increased involvement of the European Parliament and national parliaments in the evaluation of its activities.
Da bi lahko Eurojust izpolnil svojo nalogo in razvil ves svoj potencial pri boju proti hudim oblikam čezmejnih kaznivih dejanj, bi bilo treba okrepiti njegove operativne funkcije z zmanjšanjem upravne obremenitve nacionalnih članov ter povečati njegovo evropsko razsežnost na podlagi sodelovanja Komisije v izvršnem odboru in večje vključenosti Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov v ocenjevanje njegovih dejavnosti.
Therefore, this Regulation should determine the arrangements for parliamentary involvement, modernising Eurojust’s structure and simplifying its current legal framework, while maintaining those elements that have proven to be efficient in its operation.
Zato bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti ureditve za vključenost parlamentov, posodobitev strukture Eurojusta in poenostavitev njegovega sedanjega pravnega okvira, pri tem pa ohraniti tiste elemente, ki so se izkazali za učinkovite pri njegovem delovanju.
The forms of serious crime affecting two or more Member States for which Eurojust is competent should be clearly laid down.
Treba bi bilo jasno določiti oblike hudih kaznivih dejanj, ki se nanašajo na dve ali več držav članic in v zvezi s katerimi je pristojen Eurojust.
In addition, cases which do not involve two or more Member States, but which require a prosecution on common bases, should be defined.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba opredeliti primere, ki ne vključujejo dveh ali več držav članic, vendar terjajo skupni pregon.
Such cases may include investigations and prosecutions affecting only one Member State and a third country where an agreement has been concluded with that third country or where there may be a specific need for Eurojust’s involvement.
Taki primeri lahko vključujejo preiskovanje in pregon, ki se nanašata bodisi na eno samo državo članico in tretjo državo, če je bil sklenjen sporazum s tretjo državo ali če obstaja posebna potreba za vključitev Eurojusta.
Such prosecution may also refer to cases which affect one Member State and have repercussions at Union level.
Tak pregon se lahko nanaša tudi na primere, ki se nanašajo na eno samo državo članico in imajo posledice na ravni Unije.
When exercising its operational functions in relation to concrete criminal cases, at the request of the competent authorities of Member States or on its own initiative, Eurojust should act either through one or more of the national members or as a College.
Eurojust bi moral pri izvajanju svoje operativne funkcije v konkretnih kazenskih zadevah delovati preko enega ali več nacionalnih članov ali kot kolegij, in sicer bodisi na zahtevo pristojnih organov držav članic bodisi na lastno pobudo.
By acting on its own initiative, Eurojust may take a more proactive role in coordinating cases, such as by supporting the national authorities in their investigations and prosecutions.
Če Eurojust deluje na lastno pobudo, lahko zavzame bolj proaktivno vlogo pri usklajevanju zadev, kot je podpora nacionalnim organom pri njihovem preiskovanju in pregonu.
This may include involving Member States that might not initially have been included in the case and discovering links between cases based on the information it receives from Europol, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the EPPO and national authorities.
To je lahko tudi vključevanje držav članic, ki prvotno morda niso bile vključene v zadevo, in odkrivanje povezav med zadevami na podlagi informacij, ki mu jih pošljejo Europol, Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF), EJT in nacionalni organi.
This also allows Eurojust to produce guidelines, policy documents and casework-related analyses as part of its strategic work.
To tudi omogoča Eurojustu, da v okviru svojega strateškega dela pripravlja smernice, dokumente o politikah in analize, povezane s prakso.
At the request of a Member State’s competent authority or of the Commission, it should also be possible for Eurojust to assist with investigations involving only that Member State but which have repercussions at Union level.
Poleg tega bi moral imeti Eurojust možnost, da na zaprosilo pristojnega organa države članice ali Komisije pomaga pri preiskavah, ki vključujejo samo to državo članico, vendar imajo posledice na ravni Unije.
Examples of such investigations include cases where a member of a Union institution or body is involved.
Primeri takih preiskav vključujejo zadeve, v katere je vpleten član institucije ali organa Unije.
Such investigations also cover cases which involve a significant number of Member States and could potentially require a coordinated European response.
Zajemajo tudi zadeve, ki vključujejo večje število držav članic in bi bilo zanje lahko potrebno usklajeno evropsko ukrepanje.
The written opinions of Eurojust are not binding on Member States, but should be responded to in accordance with this Regulation.
Pisna mnenja Eurojusta za države članice niso zavezujoča, vendar bi se bilo treba odzvati nanje v skladu s to uredbo.
To ensure Eurojust can support and coordinate cross-border investigations appropriately, it is necessary that all national members have the necessary operational powers with respect to their Member State and in accordance with the law of that Member State in order to cooperate between themselves and with national authorities in a more coherent and effective way.
Da bi zagotovili, da lahko Eurojust ustrezno podpira in usklajuje čezmejne preiskave, je potrebno, da imajo vsi nacionalni člani potrebna operativna pooblastila v zvezi s svojo državo članico in v skladu z njenim pravom, da lahko skladneje in učinkoviteje sodelujejo med seboj in z nacionalnimi organi.
National members should be granted those powers that allow Eurojust to appropriately achieve its mission.
Nacionalnim članom bi bilo treba podeliti takšna pooblastila, ki bi Eurojustu omogočila, da ustrezno izpolni svojo nalogo.
Those powers should include accessing relevant information in national public registers, directly contacting and exchanging information with competent authorities and participating in joint investigation teams.
Ta pooblastila bi morala vključevati dostop do ustreznih informacij v nacionalnih javnih registrih, neposreden stik in izmenjavo informacij s pristojnimi organi ter sodelovanje v skupnih preiskovalnih enotah.
National members may, in accordance with their national law, retain the powers which are derived from their capacity as national authorities.
Nacionalni člani lahko v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom ohranijo pooblastila, ki jih imajo kot nacionalni organi.
In agreement with the competent national authority or in urgent cases, national members may also order investigative measures and controlled deliveries, and issue and execute requests for mutual legal assistance or mutual recognition.
V dogovoru s pristojnim nacionalnim organom ali v nujnih primerih lahko nacionalni člani odredijo tudi preiskovalne ukrepe in nadzorovane pošiljke ter izdajati in izvrševati zahtevke za medsebojno pravno pomoč ali vzajemno priznavanje.
Since those powers are to be exercised in accordance with national law, the courts of Member States should be competent to review those measures, in accordance with the requirements and procedures laid down by national law.
Ker se te pristojnosti izvajajo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, bi morala biti sodišča držav članic pristojna za pregled navedenih ukrepov, v skladu z zahtevami in postopki, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu.
It is necessary to provide Eurojust with an administrative and management structure that allows it to perform its tasks more effectively, complies with the principles applicable to Union agencies, and fully respects fundamental rights and freedoms, while maintaining Eurojust’s special characteristics and safeguarding its independence in the exercise of its operational functions.
Eurojustu je treba zagotoviti upravno in vodstveno strukturo, s katero bo lahko učinkoviteje izvajal svoje naloge in spoštoval načela, ki se uporabljajo za agencije Unije, pa tudi v celoti spoštoval temeljne pravice in svoboščine, pri čemer je treba ohraniti posebne značilnosti Eurojusta in zaščititi njegovo neodvisnost pri opravljanju njegovih operativnih funkcij.
To that end, the functions of the national members, the College and the Administrative Director should be clarified and an Executive Board established.
V ta namen bi bilo treba pojasniti funkcije nacionalnih članov, kolegija in upravnega direktorja ter ustanoviti izvršni odbor.
Provisions should be laid down to clearly distinguish between the operational and the management functions of the College, thus reducing the administrative burden on national members to a minimum so that the focus is put on Eurojust’s operational work.
Predpisati bi bilo treba določbe za jasno razlikovanje med operativno in upravljavsko funkcijo kolegija, pri tem pa čim bolj zmanjšati upravno breme nacionalnih članov, tako da je poudarek na operativnem delu Eurojusta.
The management tasks of the College should include in particular the adoption of Eurojust’s work programmes, budget, annual activity report, and working arrangements with partners.
Upravljavske naloge kolegija bi morale vključevati zlasti sprejetje delovnih programov, proračuna, letnega poročila o dejavnostih in sklenitev delovnih dogovorov s partnerji.
The College should exercise the power of appointing authority with respect to the Administrative Director.
Kolegij bi moral izvrševati pooblastila organa za imenovanja v zvezi z upravnim direktorjem.
The College should also adopt Eurojust’s rules of procedure.
Kolegij bi moral sprejeti tudi poslovnik Eurojusta.
Since those rules of procedure may have an impact on the judicial activities of the Member States, implementing powers should be conferred on the Council to approve those rules.
Ker bi ta poslovnik lahko vplival na pravosodne dejavnosti držav članic, bi bilo treba na Svet prenesti izvedbena pooblastila za odobritev teh pravil.
To improve Eurojust’s governance and streamline procedures, an Executive Board should be established to assist the College in its management functions and to allow for streamlined decision-making on non-operational and strategic issues.
Za izboljšanje upravljanja Eurojusta in poenostavitev njegovih postopkov bi bilo treba ustanoviti izvršni odbor, ki bi pomagal kolegiju pri njegovi upravljavski funkciji ter omogočil poenostavljen postopek odločanja o neoperativnih in strateških vprašanjih.
The Commission should be represented in the College when the College exercises its management functions.
Komisija bi morala biti zastopana v kolegiju, kadar ta izvaja svojo upravljavsko funkcijo.
The Commission’s representative in the College should be also its representative on the Executive Board, to ensure non-operational supervision of Eurojust and to provide it with strategic guidance.
Predstavnik Komisije v kolegiju bi moral biti tudi njen predstavnik v izvršnem odboru, da se zagotovita neoperativen nadzor nad Eurojustom in njegovo strateško usmerjanje.
In order to ensure the efficient day-to-day administration of Eurojust, the Administrative Director should be its legal representative and manager, accountable to the College.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito tekoče upravljanje Eurojusta, bi moral biti upravni direktor njegov zakoniti zastopnik in upravitelj, odgovoren kolegiju.
The Administrative Director should prepare and implement the decisions of the College and the Executive Board.
Upravni direktor bi moral pripravljati in izvrševati odločitve kolegija in izvršnega odbora.
The Administrative Director should be appointed on the basis of merit, and of his or her documented administrative and managerial skills, as well as relevant competence and experience.
Upravni direktor bi moral biti imenovan na podlagi zaslug in dokazanih upravnih in vodstvenih sposobnosti ter ustrezne usposobljenosti in izkušenj.
A President and two Vice-Presidents of Eurojust should be elected by the College from among the national members for a term of office of four years.
Kolegij bi moral izmed nacionalnih članov izvoliti predsednika in dva podpredsednika Eurojusta za štiriletni mandat.
When a national member is elected President, the Member State concerned should be able to second another suitably qualified person to the national desk and to apply for compensation from Eurojust’s budget.
Če je nacionalni član izvoljen na položaj predsednika, bi morala zadevna država članica imeti možnost napotiti drugo ustrezno usposobljeno osebo v nacionalni urad in zaprosi za nadomestilo iz proračuna Eurojusta.
Suitably qualified persons are persons who have the necessary qualifications and experience to perform the tasks required to ensure that the national desk functions effectively.
Ustrezno usposobljene osebe so osebe, ki imajo potrebne kvalifikacije in izkušnje za opravljanje nalog, ki so potrebne za zagotavljanje učinkovitega delovanja nacionalnega urada.
They may have the status of a deputy or Assistant to the national member who has been elected President or they may have a more administrative or technical function.
V zvezi s tem imajo lahko položaj namestnika ali pomočnika nacionalnega člana, ki je bil izvoljen za predsednika, ali pa bolj upravno ali tehnično funkcijo.
Each Member State should be able to decide on its own requirements in this regard.
Vsaka država članica bi morala imeti možnost, da odloči o svojih zahtevah v zvezi s tem.
Quorum and voting procedures should be regulated in Eurojust’s rules of procedure.
Kvorum in postopke glasovanja bi bilo treba ustrezno urediti s poslovnikom Eurojusta.
In exceptional cases, where a national member and his or her deputy are absent, the Assistant of the national member concerned should be entitled to vote in the College if the Assistant has the status of a magistrate, i.e. a prosecutor, judge or representative of a judicial authority.
V izjemnih primerih, ko je odsoten tako nacionalni član kot njegov namestnik, bi moral imeti pomočnik zadevnega nacionalnega člana pravico, da glasuje na kolegiju, če ima pomočnik status pravosodnega funkcionarja, tj. tožilca, sodnika ali predstavnika pravosodnega organa.
Since the compensation mechanism has a budgetary impact, this Regulation should confer implementing powers to determine that mechanism on the Council.
Ker mehanizem za nadomestila vpliva na proračun, bi bilo treba s to uredbo na Svet prenesti izvedbena pooblastila za določitev tega mehanizma.
The setting up of an on-call coordination mechanism within Eurojust is necessary to make Eurojust more efficient and enable it to be available around the clock to intervene in urgent cases.
Da bi okrepili učinkovitost in omogočili stalno dostopnost Eurojusta in njegovo posredovanje v nujnih primerih, bi bilo treba v njegovem okviru ustanoviti usklajevalni mehanizem v stalni pripravljenosti.
Each Member State should ensure that their representatives in the on-call coordination mechanism are available to act 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Vsaka država članica bi morala zagotoviti, da so njeni predstavniki v usklajevalnem mehanizmu v stalni pripravljenosti na voljo za posredovanje 24 ur na dan in 7 dni v tednu.
Eurojust national coordination systems should be set up in the Member States to coordinate the work carried out by the national correspondents for Eurojust, the national correspondent for terrorism matters, any national correspondent for issues relating to the competence of the EPPO, the national correspondent for the European Judicial Network and up to three other contact points, as well as representatives in the network for joint investigation teams and representatives in the networks set up by Council Decisions 2002/494/JHA, 2007/845/JHA and 2008/852/JHA.
V državah članicah bi bilo treba vzpostaviti nacionalne sisteme za usklajevanje dejavnosti Eurojusta, da bi usklajevali delo nacionalnih korespondentov Eurojusta, nacionalnega korespondenta za področje terorizma, vseh nacionalnih korespondentov za vprašanja v zvezi s pristojnostjo EJT, nacionalnega korespondenta Evropske pravosodne mreže in največ treh drugih kontaktnih točk ter predstavnikov mreže skupnih preiskovalnih enot in predstavnikov mrež, ustanovljenih s sklepi Sveta 2002/494/PNZ, 2007/845/PNZ in 2008/852/PNZ.
Member States may decide that one or more of those tasks are to be performed by the same national correspondent.
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da eno ali več od teh nalog izvaja isti nacionalni korespondent.
For the purposes of stimulating and strengthening coordination and cooperation between national investigating and prosecuting authorities, it is crucial that Eurojust receive information from national authorities that is necessary for the performance of its tasks.
Za spodbujanje in krepitev usklajevanja in sodelovanja med nacionalnimi organi, pristojnimi za preiskovanje in pregon, je bistveno, da Eurojust od nacionalnih organov prejme informacije, ki so potrebne za izvajanje njegovih nalog.
To that end, competent national authorities should inform their national members of the setting up and results of joint investigation teams without undue delay.
V ta namen bi morali pristojni nacionalni organi brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvestiti svoje nacionalne člane o ustanovitvi in rezultatih skupnih preiskovalnih enot.
Competent national authorities should also inform national members without undue delay of cases falling under the competence of Eurojust that directly involve at least three Member States and for which requests or decisions on judicial cooperation have been transmitted to at least two Member States.
Nacionalni organi bi morali nacionalne organe brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvestiti tudi o zadevah v pristojnosti Eurojusta, ki neposredno zadevajo vsaj tri države članice in v zvezi s katerimi so bila zaprosila ali odločitve glede pravosodnega sodelovanja poslana vsaj dvema državama članicama.
Under certain circumstances, they should also inform national members of conflicts of jurisdiction, controlled deliveries and repeated difficulties in judicial cooperation.
V določenih okoliščinah bi morali nacionalne člane obvestiti tudi o sporih o pristojnosti, nadzorovanih pošiljkah in ponavljajočih se težavah pri pravosodnem sodelovanju.
Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council sets out harmonised rules for the protection and the free movement of personal data processed for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security.
Direktiva (EU) 2016/680 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta zagotavlja harmonizirana pravila o varstvu in prostem pretoku osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo za namene preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanja kazenskih sankcij, vključno z varovanjem pred grožnjami javni varnosti in njihovim preprečevanjem.
In order to ensure the same level of protection for natural persons through legally enforceable rights throughout the Union and to prevent divergences hampering the exchange of personal data between Eurojust and competent authorities in Member States, the rules for the protection and the free movement of operational personal data processed by Eurojust should be consistent with Directive (EU) 2016/680.
Da bi zagotovili enako raven varstva posameznikov prek pravno izvršljivih pravic v vsej Uniji in preprečili, da bi razlike ovirale izmenjavo osebnih podatkov med Eurojustom in pristojnimi organi v državah članicah, bi morala biti pravila o varstvu in prostem pretoku operativnih osebnih podatkov, ki jih obdeluje Eurojust, skladna z Direktivo (EU) 2016/680.
The general rules of the distinct Chapter of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the processing of operational personal data should apply without prejudice to the specific data protection rules of this Regulation.
Splošna pravila iz posebnega poglavja Uredbe (EU) 2018/1725 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o obdelavi operativnih osebnih podatkov bi se morala uporabljati brez poseganja v posebna pravila o varstvu podatkov iz te uredbe.
Such specific rules should be regarded as lex specialis to the provisions in that Chapter of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (lex specialis derogat legi generali).
Ta posebna pravila bi bilo treba obravnavati kot lex specialis v razmerju do določb iz navedenega poglavja Uredbe (EU) 2018/1725 (lex specialis derogat legi generali).
In order to reduce legal fragmentation, specific data protection rules in this Regulation should be consistent with the principles underpinning that Chapter of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, as well as with the provisions of that Regulation relating to independent supervision, remedies, liability and penalties.
Da bi se zmanjšala pravna razdrobljenost, bi morala biti posebna pravila o varstvu podatkov v tej uredbi skladna z načeli, na katerih temelji navedeno poglavje Uredbe (EU) 2018/1725, in z določbami navedene uredbe v zvezi z neodvisnim nadzorom, pravnimi sredstvi, odgovornostjo in kaznimi.
The protection of the rights and freedoms of data subjects requires a clear attribution of responsibilities for data protection under this Regulation.
Varstvo pravic in svoboščin posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, zahteva jasno razdelitev odgovornosti za varstvo podatkov na podlagi te uredbe.
Member States should be responsible for the accuracy of data they have transmitted to Eurojust and which have been processed unaltered by Eurojust, for keeping such data up to date and for the legality of transmitting those data to Eurojust.
Države članice bi morale biti odgovorne za točnost podatkov, ki so jih poslale Eurojustu in ki jih je Eurojust nespremenjene obdelal, za posodabljanje teh podatkov in za zakonitost pošiljanja teh podatkov.
Eurojust should be responsible for the accuracy of data provided by other data suppliers or resulting from Eurojust’s own analyses or data collection and for keeping such data up to date.
Eurojust bi moral biti odgovoren za točnost podatkov, ki jih zagotovijo drugi pošiljatelji podatkov ali ki izhajajo iz Eurojustovih lastnih analiz ali zbiranja podatkov, ter za posodabljanje teh podatkov.
Eurojust should ensure that data are processed fairly and lawfully, and are collected and processed for a specific purpose.
Eurojust bi moral zagotoviti, da se podatki obdelujejo pošteno in zakonito ter da se zbirajo in obdelujejo za določen namen.