natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In such circumstances, the executing authority should no longer be obliged to execute the order.
V takšnih okoliščinah izvršitveni organ ne bi več smel biti zavezan, da izvrši sklep.
However, if the executing authority subsequently obtains information that allows it to locate the property, it should be able to execute the order without a new certificate having to be transmitted in accordance with this Regulation.
Vendar bi moral imeti izvršitveni organ v primeru, ko naknadno dobi informacije, na podlagi katerih lahko ugotovi, kje se nahaja premoženje, možnost, da izvrši sklep brez posredovanja novega potrdila v skladu s to uredbo.
Where the law of the executing State renders the execution of a freezing order or confiscation order legally impossible, the executing authority should contact the issuing authority in order to discuss the situation and to find a solution.
Kadar zaradi prava države izvršiteljice izvršitev sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu pravno ni mogoča, bi moral izvršitveni organ navezati stik z organom izdajateljem, da bi se posvetovala o teh okoliščinah in poiskala rešitev.
Such a solution could consist in the issuing authority withdrawing the order concerned.
Takšna rešitev bi lahko bila, da bi organ izdajatelj umaknil zadevni sklep.
As soon as the execution of a confiscation order has been completed, the executing authority should inform the issuing authority of the results of the execution.
Takoj potem ko je sklep o odvzemu izvršen, bi moral izvršitveni organ obvestiti organ izdajatelj o izidu izvršitve.
Where practically possible, the executing authority should, at that time, also inform the issuing authority of the property or the amount of money that has been confiscated, and of other details that it considers relevant.
Kadar je praktično mogoče, bi moral izvršitveni organ tedaj obvestiti organ izdajatelj tudi o odvzetem premoženju ali denarnem znesku ter o drugih podrobnostih, za katere meni, da so pomembne.
The execution of a freezing order or confiscation order should be governed by the law of the executing State and only the authorities of that State should be competent to decide on the procedures for execution.
Izvršitev sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu bi moralo urejati pravo države izvršiteljice, organi te države pa bi morali biti edini pristojni za odločanje o postopkih za izvršitev.
Where appropriate, the issuing and executing authority should be able to invite Eurojust or the EJN to provide assistance, within their remit, concerning issues relating to the execution of freezing orders and confiscation orders.
Kadar je to primerno, bi organ izdajatelj in izvršitveni organ morala imeti možnost pozvati Eurojust ali Evropsko pravosodno mrežo, da v okviru njunih pristojnosti zagotovita pomoč v zvezi z vprašanji, ki se nanašajo na izvrševanje sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu.
The proper operation of this Regulation presupposes close communication between the competent national authorities involved, in particular in cases of the simultaneous execution of a confiscation order in more than one Member State.
Da bi se uredba ustrezno uporabljala, se kot predpogoj domneva, da so zadevni pristojni nacionalni organi v tesnih stikih, zlasti v primerih istočasne izvršitve sklepa o odvzemu v več državah članicah.
The competent national authorities should therefore consult each other whenever necessary, directly or, where appropriate, via Eurojust or the EJN.
Zato bi se morali pristojni nacionalni organi vedno, ko je to potrebno, med seboj posvetovati, neposredno ali po potrebi prek Eurojusta ali Evropske pravosodne mreže.
The victims' rights to compensation and restitution should not be prejudiced in cross-border cases.
V čezmejnih primerih ne bi smelo priti do posega v pravice žrtev do odškodnine in povrnitve.
Rules for the disposal of frozen or confiscated property should give priority to the compensation of, and restitution of property to, victims.
V pravilih za razpolaganje z začasno zavarovanim in odvzetim premoženjem bi bilo treba dati prednost odškodnini in povrnitvi premoženja žrtvam.
The notion of ‘victim’ is to be interpreted in accordance with the law of the issuing State, which should also be able to provide that a legal person could be a victim for the purpose of this Regulation.
Pojem „žrtev“ je treba razlagati v skladu s pravom države izdajateljice, v katerem bi moralo biti mogoče določiti tudi, da je za namene te uredbe žrtev lahko tudi pravna oseba.
This Regulation should be without prejudice to rules on compensation and restitution of property to victims in national proceedings.
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v pravila o odškodnini in povrnitvi premoženja žrtvam v nacionalnem postopku.
Where the executing authority is informed of a decision issued by the issuing authority or by another competent authority in the issuing State to restitute frozen property to the victim, the executing authority should take the necessary measures to ensure that the property concerned is frozen and restituted to the victim as soon as possible.
Ko je izvršitveni organ obveščen o odločbi, ki jo je organ izdajatelj ali drug pristojni organ države izdajateljice izdal v zvezi s povrnitvijo začasno zavarovanega premoženja žrtvi, bi moral sprejeti potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovil, da se zadevno premoženje čim prej začasno zavaruje in povrne žrtvi.
The executing authority should be able to transfer the property to the issuing State, so that the latter would be able to restitute the property to the victim, or directly to the victim subject to the consent of the issuing State.
Izvršitveni organ bi moral imeti možnost premoženje prenesti na državo izdajateljico, da bi ga ta lahko povrnila žrtvi, ali pa bi ga s soglasjem države izdajateljice prenesel neposredno na žrtev.
The obligation to restitute frozen property to the victim should be subject to the following conditions: the victim's title to the property should not be contested, meaning that it is accepted that the victim is the rightful owner of the property and there are no serious claims putting that into question; the property should not be required as evidence in criminal proceedings in the executing State; and the rights of affected persons, in particular the rights of bona fide third parties, should not be prejudiced.
Za obveznost povrnitve začasno zavarovanega premoženja žrtvi bi morali veljati naslednji pogoji: upravičenost žrtve do premoženja ne bi smela biti sporna, kar pomeni, da je sprejeto, da je žrtev zakonita lastnica premoženja, in da ne obstajajo resne zahteve, ki bi to postavljale pod vprašaj; premoženje ne bi smelo biti zahtevano kot dokazni material v kazenskem postopku v državi izvršiteljici in v pravice oseb, na katere sklep vpliva, zlasti pravice tretjih oseb, ki ravnajo v dobri veri, ne bi smelo biti poseženo.
The executing authority should restitute frozen property to the victim only where those conditions have been met.
Izvršitveni organ bi moral začasno zavarovano premoženje povrniti žrtvi le, kadar so ti pogoji izpolnjeni.
Where the executing authority considers that those conditions have not been met, it should consult with the issuing authority, for example to request any additional information or to discuss the situation, in order to find a solution.
Kadar izvršitveni organ meni, da ti pogoji niso izpolnjeni, bi se moral posvetovati z organom izdajateljem, na primer zaprositi za dodatne informacije ali se pogovoriti o primeru, zato da bi našli rešitev.
If no solution can be found, the executing authority should be able to decide not to restitute the frozen property to the victim.
Če rešitve ni mogoče najti, bi izvršitveni organ moral imeti možnost, da odloči, da začasno zavarovanega premoženja žrtvi ne povrne.
Each Member State should consider establishing a national centralised office responsible for the management of frozen property, with a view to possible later confiscation, as well as for the management of confiscated property.
Vsaka država članica bi morala preučiti možnost vzpostavitve osrednjega nacionalnega urada, ki bo odgovoren za upravljanje premoženja, začasno zavarovanega zaradi morebitne poznejšega odvzema, ter odvzetega premoženja.
Frozen property and confiscated property could be earmarked, as a matter of priority, for law enforcement and organised crime prevention projects and for other projects of public interest and social utility.
Začasno zavarovano in odvzeto premoženje bi se lahko prednostno namenilo za projekte preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj ter preprečevanja organiziranega kriminala ter druge projekte, ki so v javnem interesu in so družbeno koristni.
Each Member State should consider establishing a national fund to guarantee appropriate compensation for victims of crime, such as families of police officers and public servants killed or permanently disabled in the line of duty.
Vsaka država članica bi morala preučiti možnost vzpostavitve nacionalnega sklada za zagotavljanje ustreznih odškodnin žrtvam kaznivih dejanj, kot so družine policijskih in javnih uslužbencev, ki so med opravljanjem svojega dela izgubili življenje ali postali trajno invalidni.
Member States could earmark a portion of confiscated assets for that purpose.
Države članice bi lahko v ta namen namenile del odvzetega premoženja.
Member States should not be able to claim from each other compensation for costs resulting from the application of this Regulation.
Države članice ne bi smele imeti možnosti druga od druge zahtevati povračila stroškov, ki nastanejo pri uporabi te uredbe.
However, where the executing State has incurred large or exceptional costs, for example because the property has been frozen for a considerable period of time, any proposal by the executing authority to share the costs should be considered by the issuing authority.
Če pa ima država izvršiteljica visoke ali izredne stroške, na primer ker je bilo premoženje začasno zavarovano dlje časa, bi moral organ izdajatelj preučiti vsak predlog izvršitvenega organa o delitvi stroškov.
In order to be able to address identified problems in the future regarding the content of the certificates set out in the Annexes to this Regulation as quickly as possible, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to those certificates.
Da bi bilo v prihodnosti mogoče čim prej začeti reševati ugotovljene težave glede vsebine potrdil iz prilog k tej uredbi, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje aktov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU o spremembi navedenih potrdil.
In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Za zagotovitev enakopravnega sodelovanja pri pripravi delegiranih aktov Evropski parlament in Svet prejmeta vse dokumente sočasno s strokovnjaki iz držav članic, njuni strokovnjaki pa se sistematično lahko udeležujejo sestankov strokovnih skupin Komisije, ki zadevajo pripravo delegiranih aktov.
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the mutual recognition and execution of freezing orders and confiscation orders, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of its scale and its effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU.
Ker cilja te uredbe, in sicer vzajemnega priznavanja in izvrševanja sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepov o odvzemu, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi njegovega obsega in učinkov lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 PEU.
Provisions of Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA have already been replaced by Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the freezing of evidence for Member States bound by that Directive.
Glede začasnega zavarovanja dokazov so bile za države članice, ki jih zavezuje Direktiva 2014/41/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, določbe Okvirnega sklepa 2003/577/PNZ že nadomeščene z navedeno direktivo.
Provisions of Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA as regards freezing of property should be replaced by this Regulation between Member States bound by it.
Med državami članicami, ki jih zavezuje ta uredba, bi bilo treba določbe Okvirnega sklepa 2003/577/PNZ glede začasnega zavarovanja premoženja nadomestiti s to uredbo.
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA should also be replaced by this Regulation between Member States bound by it.
Poleg tega bi morala ta uredba med državami članicami, ki jih zavezuje, nadomestiti Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ.
The provisions of Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA as regards freezing of property, as well as the provisions of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA, should therefore continue to apply not only between the Member States that are not bound by this Regulation but also between any Member State that is not bound by this Regulation and any Member State that is bound by this Regulation.
Določbe Okvirnega sklepa 2003/577/PNZ glede začasnega zavarovanja premoženja in določbe Okvirnega sklepa 2006/783/PNZ bi se tako morale še naprej uporabljati ne samo med državami članicami, ki jih ta uredba ne zavezuje, ampak tudi med katero koli državo članico, ki je ta uredba ne zavezuje, in katero koli državo članico, ki jo ta uredba zavezuje.
The legal form of this act should not constitute a precedent for future legal acts of the Union in the field of mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions in criminal matters.
Pravna oblika tega akta ne bi smela predstavljati precedensa za prihodnje pravne akte Unije na področju vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in sodnih odločb v kazenskih zadevah.
The choice of the legal form for future legal acts of the Union should be carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis taking into account, among other factors, the effectiveness of the legal act and the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity.
Izbiro pravne oblike prihodnjih pravnih aktov Unije bi bilo treba skrbno oceniti v vsakem primeru posebej, med drugim ob upoštevanju učinkovitosti pravnega akta ter načel sorazmernosti in subsidiarnosti.
Member States should ensure that, in accordance with Council Decision 2007/845/JHA, their Asset Recovery Offices cooperate with each other to facilitate the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime and other crime-related property which may become the object of a freezing order or confiscation order.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da njihovi uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2007/845/PNZ medsebojno sodelujejo zaradi olajšanja sledenja in identifikacije premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, in drugega premoženja, povezanega s kaznivimi dejanji, ki je lahko predmet sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu.
In accordance with Article 3 and Article 4a(1) of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, the United Kingdom has notified its wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.
V skladu s členom 3 in členom 4a(1) Protokola št. 21 o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, je Združeno kraljestvo podalo uradno obvestilo, da želi sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te uredbe.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 and Article 4a(1) of Protocol No 21, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, Ireland is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 in členom 4a(1) Protokola št. 21 in brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola Irska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
SUBJECT-MATTER, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE
PREDMET UREJANJA, OPREDELITEV POJMOV IN PODROČJE UPORABE
This Regulation lays down the rules under which a Member State recognises and executes in its territory freezing orders and confiscation orders issued by another Member State within the framework of proceedings in criminal matters.
Ta uredba določa pravila, v skladu s katerimi država članica na svojem ozemlju prizna in izvrši sklepe o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepe o odvzemu, ki jih izda druga država članica v okviru postopkov v kazenskih zadevah.
This Regulation shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect the fundamental rights and legal principles enshrined in Article 6 TEU.
Ta uredba ne spreminja obveznosti spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in pravnih načel, kot so določeni v členu 6 PEU.
When issuing freezing orders or confiscation orders, issuing authorities shall ensure that the principles of necessity and proportionality are respected.
Organi izdajatelji pri izdaji sklepov o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepov o odvzemu zagotovijo spoštovanje načel nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
This Regulation does not apply to freezing orders and confiscation orders issued within the framework of proceedings in civil or administrative matters.
Ta uredba se ne uporablja za sklepe o začasnem zavarovanju in sklepe o odvzemu, izdane v okviru postopkov v civilnih ali upravnih zadevah.
‘freezing order’ means a decision issued or validated by an issuing authority in order to prevent the destruction, transformation, removal, transfer or disposal of property with a view to the confiscation thereof;
„sklep o začasnem zavarovanju“ pomeni odločbo, ki jo izda ali potrdi organ izdajatelj, da prepreči uničenje, preoblikovanje, odstranitev, prenos ali odsvojitev premoženja z namenom odvzema;
‘confiscation order’ means a final penalty or measure, imposed by a court following proceedings in relation to a criminal offence, resulting in the final deprivation of property of a natural or legal person;
„sklep o odvzemu“ pomeni pravnomočno sankcijo ali ukrep, ki ga je izreklo sodišče po zaključku postopkov v zvezi s kaznivim dejanjem, kar vodi k dokončnemu odvzemu premoženja fizične ali pravne osebe;
‘property’ means property of any description, whether corporeal or incorporeal, movable or immovable, and legal documents or instruments evidencing title or interest in such property, which the issuing authority considers to be:
„premoženje“ pomeni vsakršno premoženje, materialno ali nematerialno, premično ali nepremično, in pravne listine ali instrumente, ki izkazujejo pravni naslov ali upravičenje na takšnem premoženju, za katero organ izdajatelj meni, da:
the proceeds of a criminal offence, or its equivalent, whether the full amount of the value or only part of the value of such proceeds;
predstavlja premoženjsko korist, pridobljeno s kaznivim dejanjem, ali ustreza celotni ali zgolj delni vrednosti takšne premoženjske koristi;
the instrumentalities of a criminal offence, or the value of such instrumentalities;
predstavlja predmete, ki so bili uporabljeni za kaznivo dejanje, ali vrednost takšnih predmetov;
subject to confiscation through the application in the issuing State of any of the powers of confiscation provided for in Directive 2014/42/EU; or
ga je treba odvzeti z uporabo katerih koli pristojnosti odvzema v državi izdajateljici v skladu z Direktivo 2014/42/EU ali
subject to confiscation under any other provisions relating to powers of confiscation, including confiscation without a final conviction, under the law of the issuing State, following proceedings in relation to a criminal offence;
ga je treba odvzeti po zaključku postopkov v zvezi s kaznivim dejanjem na podlagi katere koli druge določbe v zvezi s pristojnostmi odvzema, vključno z odvzemom brez pravnomočne obsodbe, v skladu s pravom države izdajateljice;
‘proceeds’ means any economic advantage derived directly or indirectly from a criminal offence, consisting of any form of property and including any subsequent reinvestment or transformation of direct proceeds and any valuable benefits;
„premoženjska korist“ pomeni vsakršno gospodarsko korist, neposredno ali posredno pridobljeno s kaznivim dejanjem, ki zajema kakršno koli obliko premoženja ter vključuje vsakršno nadaljnje ponovno vlaganje ali preoblikovanje neposredne premoženjske koristi in vse koristi, ki imajo določeno vrednost;
‘instrumentalities’ means any property used or intended to be used, in any manner, wholly or partially, to commit a criminal offence;
„predmeti, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja,“ pomeni vsakršno premoženje, ki se uporablja ali je na kakršen koli način v celoti ali delno namenjeno storitvi kaznivega dejanja;
‘issuing State’ means the Member State in which a freezing order or confiscation order is issued;
„država izdajateljica“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri se izda sklep o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklep o odvzemu;
‘executing State’ means the Member State to which a freezing order or confiscation order is transmitted for the purpose of recognition and execution;
„država izvršiteljica“ pomeni državo članico, ki se ji posreduje sklep o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklep o odvzemu za namene priznanja in izvršitve;
‘issuing authority’ means:
„organ izdajatelj“ pomeni:
in respect of a freezing order:
v smislu sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju:
a judge, court, or public prosecutor competent in the case concerned; or
sodnika, sodišče ali državnega tožilca, pristojnega v zadevnem primeru, ali
another competent authority which is designated as such by the issuing State and which is competent in criminal matters to order the freezing of property or to execute a freezing order in accordance with national law.
drug pristojni organ, ki ga kot takega imenuje država izdajateljica in je pristojen, da v kazenskih zadevah odredi začasno zavarovanje premoženja ali izvrši sklep o začasnem zavarovanju v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
In addition, before it is transmitted to the executing authority, the freezing order shall be validated by a judge, court or public prosecutor in the issuing State after examining its conformity with the conditions for issuing such an order under this Regulation.
Poleg tega sklep o začasnem zavarovanju, preden se posreduje izvršitvenemu organu in po preučitvi njegove skladnosti s pogoji za izdajo takšnega sklepa v skladu s to uredbo, potrdi sodnik, sodišče ali državni tožilec države izdajateljice.
Where the order has been validated by a judge, court or public prosecutor, that other competent authority may also be regarded as an issuing authority for the purposes of transmitting the order;
Kadar sodnik, sodišče ali državni tožilec potrdi sklep, se ta drugi pristojni organ lahko obravnava tudi kot organ izdajatelj za namene posredovanja sklepa;
in respect of a confiscation order, an authority which is designated as such by the issuing State and which is competent in criminal matters to execute a confiscation order issued by a court in accordance with national law;
v smislu sklepa o odvzemu organ, ki ga kot takega imenuje država izdajateljica in je pristojen, da v kazenskih zadevah izvrši sklep o odvzemu, ki ga izda sodišče v skladu z nacionalnim pravom;
‘executing authority’ means an authority that is competent to recognise a freezing order or confiscation order and to ensure its execution in accordance with this Regulation and the procedures applicable under national law for the freezing and confiscation of property; where such procedures require that a court register the order and authorise its execution, the executing authority includes the authority that is competent to request such registration and authorisation;
„izvršitveni organ“ pomeni organ, ki je pristojen za priznanje sklepa o začasnem zavarovanju ali sklepa o odvzemu in zagotovitev njegove izvršitve v skladu s to uredbo in postopki, ki se v skladu z nacionalnim pravom uporabljajo za začasno zavarovanje in odvzem premoženja; kadar je pri takšnih postopkih potrebno, da sodišče evidentira sklep in odobri njegovo izvršitev, izvršitveni organ vključi organ, ki je pristojen, da zaprosi za takšno evidentiranje in odobritev;