natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Clear environmental, economic and social benefits would be derived from further increasing the targets laid down in Directive 94/62/EC for recycling of packaging waste.
Nadaljnje zvišanje ciljev recikliranja odpadne embalaže iz Direktive 94/62/ES bi zagotovilo jasne okoljske, gospodarske in družbene koristi.
It should be ensured that economically valuable waste materials are progressively and effectively recovered through proper waste management and in line with the waste hierarchy as laid down in Directive 2008/98/EC, and are channelled back into the European economy, thereby making progress in the implementation of the Commission Communication of 4 November 2008 on ‘The raw materials initiative: meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe’ and the creation of a circular economy.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da bodo odpadni materiali, ki so koristni za gospodarstvo, s pravilnim ravnanjem z odpadki in v skladu s hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki, kot je določena v Direktivi 2008/98/ES, v vse večjem obsegu in učinkovito predelani ter vrnjeni v evropsko gospodarstvo, s čimer bo zagotovljen napredek pri izvajanju sporočila Komisije z dne 4. novembra 2008, „Pobuda za surovine – zagotavljanje preskrbe z nujno potrebnimi surovinami za rast in delovna mesta v Evropi“, in pri vzpostavitvi krožnega gospodarstva.
It is therefore essential to set clear long-term policy objectives in order to avoid locking recyclable materials at the lower levels of the waste hierarchy.
Zato je bistvenega pomena, da se določijo jasni dolgoročni cilji politike, da bi se izognili izgubi materialov, ki so primerni za recikliranje, na nižjih ravneh hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki.
This Directive sets long-term objectives for the Union’s waste management and gives economic operators and Member States a clear direction for the investments needed to achieve those objectives.
Ta direktiva določa dolgoročne cilje ravnanja z odpadki v Uniji ter gospodarskim subjektom in državam članicam daje jasno usmeritev za naložbe, ki so potrebne za doseganje teh ciljev.
In developing their national waste management plans and planning investments in waste management infrastructure, Member States should make sound use of investments, including through Union Funds, by prioritising prevention including reuse, and recycling, in line with the waste hierarchy.
Pri pripravi njihovih nacionalnih načrtov ravnanja z odpadki in pri načrtovanju naložb v infrastrukturo za ravnanje z odpadki bi morale države članice ustrezno uporabiti naložbe, tudi preko skladov Unije, pri tem pa v skladu s hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki dajati prednost preprečevanju, vključno s ponovno uporabo, in recikliranju.
As a result of the combination of recycling targets and landfill restrictions laid down in Directive 2008/98/EC and Council Directive 1999/31/EC, setting targets for recovery and maximum targets for recycling of packaging waste is no longer necessary.
Zaradi kombinacije ciljev recikliranja in omejevanja odlaganja odpadkov na odlagališčih, določenih v direktivah 2008/98/ES in 1999/31/ES, določitev ciljev predelave in maksimalnih ciljev recikliranja odpadne embalaže niso več potrebni.
Separate recycling targets should be set for ferrous metals and aluminium in order to achieve significant economic and environmental benefits because more aluminium would be recycled leading to significant savings in energy and reduction of carbon dioxide emissions.
Da se zagotovijo znatne gospodarske in okoljske koristi, bi bilo treba določiti ločene cilje recikliranja za železo in jeklo ter za aluminij, saj bi se recikliralo več aluminija, kar bi vodilo do znatnih prihrankov energije in zmanjšanja emisij ogljikovega dioksida.
The existing recycling target for metal packaging should therefore be split into separate targets for those two types of waste.
Sedanji cilj recikliranja kovinske embalaže bi bilo zato treba razdeliti na ločena cilja za ti dve vrsti odpadkov.
The 2030 recycling targets for packaging should be examined with a view to maintaining or, if appropriate, increasing them.
Cilje recikliranja odpadne embalaže za leto 2030 bi bilo treba pregledati, da se ugotovi, ali naj se jih ohrani ali po potrebi zviša.
During that review, attention should also be paid to specific packaging waste streams such as household, commercial and industrial packaging waste as well as composite packaging waste.
Med tem pregledom bi bilo treba pozornost nameniti tudi specifičnim tokovom odpadne embalaže, kot so odpadna embalaža iz gospodinjstev, iz trgovin in industrije ter odpadna sestavljena (kompozitna) embalaža.
The calculation of the recycling targets should be based on the weight of packaging waste which enters recycling.
Izračun ciljev recikliranja bi moral temeljiti na masi odpadne embalaže, ki vstopa v recikliranje.
As a general rule, the actual measurement of the weight of packaging waste counted as recycled should be at the point where packaging waste enters the recycling operation.
Dejansko tehtanje odpadne embalaže, ki se šteje kot reciklirana, bi se moralo praviloma izvajati na točki, kjer odpadna embalaža vstopa v postopek recikliranja.
Nevertheless, in order to limit administrative burdens, Member States should, under strict conditions and by way of derogation from the general rule, be allowed to establish the weight of packaging waste recycled on the basis of measuring the output of any sorting operation.
Da se omejijo administrativna bremena, pa bi bilo kljub temu treba državam članicam pod strogimi pogoji in z odstopanjem od splošnega pravila omogočiti, da maso reciklirane odpadne embalaže ugotavljajo na podlagi meritev na izhodu iz katerega koli postopka sortiranja.
Losses of materials which occur before the waste enters the recycling operation, for instance due to sorting or other preliminary operations, should not be included in the waste amounts reported as recycled.
Izgube materialov, do katerih pride, preden odpadki vstopijo v postopek recikliranja, na primer zaradi sortiranja ali drugih predhodnih postopkov, ne bi smele biti vključene v količine odpadkov, ki se poročajo kot reciklirani.
Those losses can be established on the basis of electronic registries, technical specifications, detailed rules on the calculation of average loss rates for various waste streams or other equivalent measures.
Te izgube se lahko določijo na podlagi elektronskih registrov, tehničnih specifikacij, podrobnih pravil o izračunu stopenj povprečnih izgub za različne tokove odpadkov ali drugih enakovrednih ukrepov.
Member States should report on such measures in the quality check reports accompanying the data which they report to the Commission on waste recycling.
Države članice bi morale te ukrepe vključiti v poročila o preverjanju kakovosti, ki se priložijo podatkom o recikliranju odpadkov, sporočenih Komisiji.
The average loss rates should preferably be established at the level of individual sorting facilities and should be linked to the different main types of waste, different sources (such as household or commercial), different collection schemes and different types of sorting processes.
Stopnje povprečnih izgub bi bilo treba po možnosti določati na ravni posameznih naprav za sortiranje odpadkov in jih povezati z različnimi glavnimi vrstami odpadkov, različnimi viri (kot so gospodinjstva ali trgovine), različnimi sistemi zbiranja in različnimi vrstami postopkov sortiranja.
Average loss rates should only be used in cases where no other reliable data are available, in particular in the context of shipment and export of waste.
Stopnje povprečnih izgub bi se morale uporabljati samo, kadar ni dovolj drugih zanesljivih podatkov, zlasti pri pošiljkah in izvozu odpadkov.
Losses in weight of materials or substances due to physical or chemical transformation processes inherent in the recycling operation where packaging waste is actually reprocessed into products, materials or substances should not be deducted from the weight of the waste reported as recycled.
Izguba mase materialov ali snovi zaradi procesov fizičnega ali kemičnega preoblikovanja, ki so neločljivo povezani s postopkom recikliranja, v katerem se odpadna embalaža dejansko predela v proizvode, materiale ali snovi, se ne bi smela odšteti od mase odpadkov, ki se poročajo kot reciklirani.
Where packaging waste materials cease to be waste as a result of a preparatory operation before being actually reprocessed, such materials can be counted as recycled provided that they are destined for subsequent reprocessing into products, materials or substances, whether for their original or other purposes.
Odpadni embalažni materiali, ki po pripravljalnem postopku pred dejansko predelavo niso več odpadki, lahko štejejo za reciklirane, če so namenjeni za nadaljnjo predelavo v proizvode, materiale ali snovi, bodisi za prvotni namen bodisi za druge namene.
End-of-waste materials which are to be used as fuels or other means to generate energy, which are backfilled or disposed of, or which are to be used in any operation that has the same purpose as recovery of waste other than recycling, should not be counted towards the attainment of the recycling targets.
Materiali, ki niso več odpadki in bodo uporabljeni kot gorivo ali druga sredstva za pridobivanje energije, ki bodo uporabljeni za zasipanje ali bodo odstranjeni, ali bodo uporabljeni v drugih postopkih, katerih namen je enak kot predelava odpadkov, razen recikliranja, se ne bi smeli upoštevati pri izračunu doseganja ciljev recikliranja.
Where the calculation of the recycling rate is applied to aerobic or anaerobic treatment of biodegradable packaging waste, the amount of waste that enters aerobic or anaerobic treatment can be counted as recycled provided that such treatment generates output which is to be used as a recycled product, material or substance.
Kadar se izračun stopnje recikliranja uporablja za aerobno ali anaerobno obdelavo odpadne biorazgradljive embalaže, lahko količina odpadkov, ki vstopajo v aerobno ali anaerobno obdelavo, šteje za reciklirano, če s to obdelavo nastane izhodni produkt, ki bo uporabljen kot reciklirani proizvod, material ali snov.
While the output of such treatment is most commonly compost or digestate, other output could also be taken into account provided that it contains comparable quantities of recycled content in relation to the amount of the treated biodegradable packaging waste.
Izhodni produkt takšne obdelave je najpogosteje kompost ali digestat, vendar se lahko upoštevajo tudi drugi izhodni produkti, če vsebujejo primerljive količine recikliranih vsebnosti glede na količine obdelane odpadne biorazgradljive embalaže.
In other cases, in line with the definition of recycling, the reprocessing of biodegradable packaging waste into materials which are to be used as fuels or other means to generate energy, which are disposed of, or which are to be used in any operation that has the same purpose as recovery of waste other than recycling, should not be counted towards the attainment of the recycling targets.
V drugih primerih se ponovna predelava odpadne biorazgradljive embalaže v materiale, ki bodo uporabljeni kot gorivo ali druga sredstva za pridobivanje energije, ki bodo odstranjeni ali bodo uporabljeni v drugih postopkih, katerih namen je enak kot predelava odpadkov, razen recikliranja, v skladu z opredelitvijo pojma recikliranje ne bi smela upoštevati pri izračunu doseganja ciljev recikliranja.
In the case of exports of packaging waste from the Union for recycling, Member States should make effective use of the inspection powers provided for in Article 50(4c) of Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council to require documentary evidence to ascertain whether a shipment is destined for recovery operations which are in compliance with Article 49 of that Regulation and therefore managed in an environmentally sound manner at a facility operating in accordance with human health and environmental protection standards that are broadly equivalent to standards established in Union legislation.
Če se odpadna embalaža izvozi iz Unije za recikliranje, bi morale države članice dejansko uporabiti inšpekcijska pooblastila iz člena 50(4c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1013/2006 in zahtevati ustrezna dokazila o tem, ali je pošiljka namenjena za postopke predelave, ki so skladni s členom 49 navedene uredbe, in se zato z njo ravna na za okolje varen način v napravi, ki deluje v skladu s standardi varovanja zdravja ljudi in okolja, ki so na splošno enakovredni standardom, določenim v zakonodaji Unije.
In carrying out that task, Member States could cooperate with other relevant actors, such as the competent authorities in the country of destination, independent third-party verification bodies or organisations implementing extended producer responsibility obligations on behalf of producers of products established under extended producer responsibility schemes, which could carry out physical and other checks of facilities in third countries.
Države članice bi lahko pri tej nalogi sodelovale z drugimi ustreznimi akterji, kot so pristojni organi v namembni državi, neodvisni organi tretjih oseb za preverjanje ali organizacije, ki izvajajo obveznosti razširjene odgovornosti proizvajalca v imenu proizvajalcev proizvodov, vzpostavljene v skladu s sistemi razširjene odgovornosti proizvajalca, ki bi lahko opravljali fizične in druge preglede naprav v tretjih državah.
In the quality check report accompanying the data on the attainment of the targets, Member States should report on the measures to implement the obligation to ensure that waste exported from the Union is treated in broadly equivalent conditions to those required under relevant Union environmental law.
Države članice bi morale v poročilu o preverjanju kakovosti, priloženem podatkom o doseganju ciljev, poročati o ukrepih za izvajanje te obveznosti, s katerimi zagotavljajo, da so odpadki, izvoženi iz Unije, obdelani pod pogoji, ki so v splošnem enakovredni tistim, določenim v ustreznem okoljskem pravu Unije.
In order to ensure better, more timely and more uniform implementation of this Directive and anticipate any implementation weaknesses, a system of early warning reports should be established to detect shortcomings and allow taking action ahead of the deadlines for meeting the targets.
Da se zagotovi boljše, pravočasnejše in enotnejše izvajanje te direktive ter predvidijo vsakršne pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju, bi bilo treba vzpostaviti sistem poročil zgodnjega opozarjanja za odkrivanje pomanjkljivosti in ukrepanje pred iztekom rokov za izpolnitev ciljev.
As the amount and type of packaging used generally depends on choices made by the producer rather than the consumer, extended producer responsibility schemes should be established.
Ker sta količina in vrsta embalaže, ki se običajno uporablja, bolj odvisna od izbire proizvajalca kot pa potrošnika, bi bilo treba vzpostaviti razširjeno odgovornost proizvajalca.
Effective extended producer responsibility schemes can have a positive environmental impact by reducing the generation of packaging waste and increasing its separate collection and recycling.
Učinkoviti sistemi razširjene odgovornosti proizvajalca lahko z zmanjševanjem nastajanja odpadne embalaže ter njenim intenzivnejšim ločevanjem in recikliranjem pozitivno vplivajo na okolje.
While extended producer responsibility schemes for packaging already exist in most Member States, there are wide disparities in the way they are set up, in their efficiency and in the scope of responsibility of producers.
Čeprav v večini držav članic že obstajajo sistemi razširjene odgovornosti proizvajalca, se po načinu, kako so vzpostavljeni“ njihovi učinkovitosti in obsegu odgovornosti proizvajalcev močno razlikujejo.
The rules on extended producer responsibility laid down in Directive 2008/98/EC should therefore apply to extended producer responsibility schemes for producers of packaging.
Pravila glede razširjene odgovornosti proizvajalca, določena v Direktivi 2008/98/ES, bi se morala zato uporabljati za sisteme razširjene odgovornosti proizvajalca za proizvajalce embalaže.
In order to boost the prevention of packaging waste, reduce its impact on the environment and promote recycling materials of high quality, while ensuring the functioning of the internal market, avoiding obstacles to trade and avoiding distortion and restriction of competition within the Union, the essential requirements of Directive 94/62/EC and Annex II thereto should be reviewed, and if necessary amended in order to strengthen the requirements with a view to enhancing the design for reuse and a high quality recycling of packaging.
Da bi se izboljšalo preprečevanje odpadne embalaže, zmanjšal njen vpliv na okolje in spodbudilo recikliranje visokokakovostnih materialov, ne da bi to oviralo delovanje notranjega trga, povzročalo trgovinske ovire ter izkrivljalo in omejevalo konkurenco v Uniji, bi bilo treba pregledati in po potrebi spremeniti bistvene zahteve iz Direktive 94/62/ES in Priloge II k navedeni direktivi ter po potrebi uvesti strožje zahteve, s katerimi se bo okrepilo oblikovanje embalaže za ponovno uporabo in visokokakovostno recikliranje.
Data reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with Union waste law by Member States.
Podatki, ki jih sporočijo države članice, so za Komisijo bistveni za to, da ocenijo skladnost držav članic s pravom Unije o odpadkih.
Implementation reports prepared by Member States every three years have not proved to be an effective tool for verifying compliance or ensuring good implementation, and are generating unnecessary administrative burdens.
Poročila o izvajanju, ki jih države članice pripravijo vsaka tri leta, se niso izkazala kot učinkovito orodje za preverjanje skladnosti ali zagotavljanje pravilnega izvajanja, ustvarjajo pa nepotrebna upravna bremena.
Therefore, when reporting on the attainment of the targets set out in Directive 94/62/EC as amended by this Directive, Member States should use the most recent rules developed by the Commission and methodologies developed by the respective national competent authorities responsible for implementing this Directive.
Zato bi morale države članice pri pripravi poročil o doseganju ciljev iz Direktive 94/62/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena s to direktivo, uporabiti najnovejša pravila, ki jih razvije Komisija, in metodologije, ki jih razvijejo ustrezni nacionalni pristojni organi, ki so odgovorni za izvajanje te direktive.
In order to supplement or amend Directive 94/62/EC, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of Articles 11(3) and 19(2) and Article 20 of that Directive, as amended by this Directive.
Da bi se dopolnila ali spremenila Direktiva 94/62/ES, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejme akte v zvezi s členom 11(3), členom 19(2) in členom 20 navedene direktive, kakor so bili spremenjeni s to direktivo.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Directive 94/62/EC, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of Articles 5(4), 6a(9), 12(3d) and 19(1) thereof as amended by this Directive.
Ker ciljev te direktive, namreč na eni strani preprečiti ali zmanjšati vsakršen vpliv embalaže in odpadne embalaže na okolje, s tem pa zagotoviti visoko stopnjo varstva okolja, na drugi strani pa zagotoviti delovanje notranjega trga in preprečiti trgovinske ovire ter izkrivljanje in omejevanje konkurence v Uniji, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepov lažje dosežejo na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely on the one hand, to prevent any impact from packaging and packaging waste on the environment or to reduce such impact, thereby providing a high level of environmental protection, and, on the other, to ensure the functioning of the internal market and to avoid obstacles to trade and distortion and restriction of competition within the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of the measures, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Direktivo 94/62/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov je metoda ponovnega sprejema navedena kot ustrezno sredstvo za trajno in splošno zagotavljanje razumljivosti pravnih aktov Unije, saj preprečuje preveliko število aktov o spremembah, zaradi katerih so pravni akti pogosto težko razumljivi.
Directive 94/62/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Poleg tega so tri institucije v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 13. aprila 2016 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje potrdile svojo zavezo, da bodo za spremembo obstoječe zakonodaje pogosteje uporabljale zakonodajno tehniko prenovitve.
According to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, the recasting technique is an appropriate means of ensuring the readability of Union legislation on a permanent and universal basis, by preventing the proliferation of isolated amending acts which often make legal acts difficult to understand.
Ker je bila Direktiva 94/62/ES spremenjena že šestkrat, bi jo bilo primerno v bližnji prihodnosti prenoviti.
Moreover, in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making, the three institutions confirmed their commitment to using the legislative technique of recasting for the modification of existing legislation more frequently.
V skladu s Skupno politično izjavo z dne 28. septembra 2011 držav članic in Komisije o obrazložitvenih dokumentih se države članice zavezujejo, da bodo v upravičenih primerih obvestilu o ukrepih za prenos priložile enega ali več dokumentov, v katerih se pojasni razmerje med sestavnimi elementi direktive in ustreznimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
Therefore, in view of the fact that Directive 94/62/EC has already been amended six times, it would be appropriate to recast Directive 94/62/EC in the near future.
Zakonodajalec meni, da je posredovanje takih dokumentov v primeru te direktive upravičeno –
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents, Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO DIREKTIVO:
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Spremembe
Article 1
Direktiva 94/62/ES se spremeni:
Amendments
v členu 1 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Directive 94/62/EC is amended as follows:
V ta namen ta direktiva določa ukrepe, katerih poglavitni cilj je preprečevati nastajanje odpadne embalaže, dodatna temeljna načela pa obsegajo ponovno uporabo embalaže, recikliranje in druge oblike predelave odpadne embalaže, da bi se zmanjšal obseg končnega odstranjevanja takšnih odpadkov, in da bi se prispevalo k prehodu na krožno gospodarstvo.“;
in Article 1, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
člen 3 se spremeni: