natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission considered that CARBIO's and the exporting producers' commitment not to issue export certificates for more than 37 % of the annual level within one quarter reduces the risk that the Argentine exports of biodiesel will be concentrated in a specific period.
Komisija je menila, da zaveza zbornice CARBIO in proizvajalcev izvoznikov, da v enem četrtletju ne bodo izdajali izvoznih potrdil za več kot 37 % letne ravni, zmanjšuje tveganje, da bi bil argentinski izvoz biodizla skoncentriran v določenem obdobju.
Therefore, the claim concerning the possible concentration of imports is addressed.
Tako je vprašanje o morebitni koncentraciji uvoza rešeno.
The EBB proposed the inclusion of a new clause in the undertaking offers which would clarify CARBIO's and the exporter's commitment not to undermine the objectives of the undertaking offers.
Odbor EBB je predlagal, da se v ponudbe zavez vključi nova klavzula, ki bi pojasnila zavezo zbornice CARBIO in izvoznikov, da ne bodo ogrozili ciljev ponudb zavez.
The Commission confirmed that it is a general obligation of exporters and CARBIO to respect the terms of the undertakings and not to undermine their effects.
Komisija je potrdila, da imajo izvozniki in zbornica CARBIO splošno obveznost, da spoštujejo pogoje zavez in da ne ogrožajo njihovih učinkov.
The EBB, VDB and UFOP in particular, requested a weekly or monthly established MIP instead of a quarterly established one as proposed in the undertaking offers.
Zlasti odbor EBB, združenje VDB in zveza UFOP so zahtevali tedensko ali mesečno določeno minimalno uvozno ceno, namesto določanja te cene vsako četrtletje, kot je predlagano v ponudbah zavez.
According to them, such a weekly or monthly established MIP would limit the arbitrage possibilities for the Argentine exporters in a very volatile and fluctuating market.
Po njihovem mnenju bi taka tedensko ali mesečno določena minimalna uvozna cena omejila možnosti arbitraže za argentinske izvoznike na zelo nestanovitnem in spremenljivem trgu.
The Commission carefully examined that request and concluded that an established MIP on a quarterly basis ensures a better and a proper enforceability and implementation of the undertaking offers whilst not compromising the effectiveness of the remedy for the Union industry.
Komisija je skrbno preučila navedeno zahtevo in ugotovila, da določitev minimalne uvozne cene vsako četrtletje zagotavlja boljšo in ustrezno izvršljivost ter izvajanje ponudb zavez, ne da bi bila s tem ogrožena učinkovitost pravnega sredstva za industrijo Unije.
The EBB claimed that the level of the MIP within the annual level should be set at an adequate level as a MIP within 10 % (or even 5 %) market share is a price setter in a commodity market.
Odbor EBB je trdil, da bi bilo treba raven minimalne uvozne cene na letni ravni določiti na ustrezni ravni, saj minimalna uvozna cena v okviru 10 % (ali celo 5 %) tržnega deleža določa cene na trgu primarnih proizvodov.
The Commission noted that the EBB has not substantiated this claim but stated in general that that would be the case for any commodity market.
Komisija je opozorila, da odbor EBB ni utemeljil te trditve, ampak na splošno navedel, da to velja za kateri koli trg primarnih proizvodov.
Further, the EBB claimed that CARBIO expressly acknowledged that the MIP would never be at non-injurious level by stating that the duty is set at such a high level that it is unrealistic to consider that the Argentine exporters would be able to make any exports subject to the payment of the duty throughout the duration of the undertaking offers.
Poleg tega je odbor EBB trdil, da je zbornica CARBIO izrecno priznala, da minimalna uvozna cena nikoli ne bo na neškodljivi ravni, saj je navedla, da je dajatev določena na tako visoki ravni, da ni realno pričakovati, da bi argentinski izvozniki v celotnem času trajanja ponudb zavez izvedli kateri koli izvoz, za katerega velja plačilo dajatve.
The Commission noted that it assessed the undertaking offers in their entirety and considers that the combination of the MIP with the proposed annual level plus the ad valorem duty applicable to imports of the product concerned exceeding that annual level removes the effects of injurious subsidization.
Komisija je opozorila, da je ponudbe zavez ocenila v celoti, in meni, da kombinacija minimalne uvozne cene s predlagano letno ravnjo in dajatvijo ad valorem, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki presega navedeno letno raven, odpravlja učinke škodljivega subvencioniranja.
The EBB alleged that the soybean oil price to be used to calculate the MIP was distorted through the GOA's intervention as allegedly acknowledged by the Commission in the Regulation imposing definitive measures on biodiesel in 2013.
Odbor EBB je trdil, da je cena sojinega olja, ki jo je treba uporabiti za izračun minimalne uvozne cene, izkrivljena zaradi posredovanja argentinske vlade, kar je Komisija domnevno priznala v uredbi iz leta 2013 o uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov za biodizel.
Recital 36 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 stated clearly that the reference price published by the GOA reflects the level of international prices.
V uvodni izjavi 36 Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1194/2013 je bilo jasno določeno, da referenčna cena, ki jo objavi argentinska vlada, odraža raven mednarodnih cen.
Recital 38 of that Regulation states that the domestic prices of the main raw material used by biodiesel producers in Argentina were found to be artificially lower than the international prices due to the distortion created by the Argentine export tax system.
V uvodni izjavi 38 navedene uredbe je določeno, da je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile domače cene glavne surovine, ki jo uporabljajo proizvajalci biodizla v Argentini, umetno nižje od mednarodnih cen zaradi izkrivljanja, ki izhaja iz argentinskega sistema izvoznih davkov.
The EBB made reference to the reasons the Commission used to reject the undertaking offers submitted back in 2013 by the Indonesian exporting producers of biodiesel and asked the Commission to explain why those reasons no longer apply.
Odbor EBB se je skliceval na razloge, ki jih je Komisija uporabila za zavrnitev ponudb zavez, ki so jih leta 2013 predložili indonezijski proizvajalci izvozniki biodizla, in jo pozval, naj pojasni, zakaj navedeni razlogi ne veljajo več.
The Commission noted that each undertaking offer is assessed on its own merits at the point in time it is received in light of the circumstances of the case.
Komisija je opozorila, da se vsaka ponudba zavez oceni glede na njene prednosti v trenutku, ko se predloži glede na okoliščine primera.
The Commission received undertaking offers from all the Argentine exporting producers and assessed these offers on their own merits, with regard to all the elements put forward therein and the findings made in the current investigation.
Komisija je prejela ponudbe zavez vseh argentinskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in je te ponudbe ocenila glede na njihove prednosti v zvezi z vsemi v njih vsebovanimi elementi ter glede na ugotovitve sedanje preiskave.
On the basis of that assessment and taking into account all elements of the offers the Commission proposed the acceptance of the undertaking offers from the Argentine exporting producers and CARBIO.
Na podlagi navedene ocene in ob upoštevanju vseh elementov iz ponudb je Komisija predlagala sprejetje ponudb zavez argentinskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in zbornice CARBIO.
The EBB claimed that because of the cross compensation risks, the Argentine exporting producers should not be allowed to sell 5 % of other products originating in Argentina.
Odbor EBB je trdil, da argentinski proizvajalci izvoznikom zaradi tveganj navzkrižne kompenzacije ne bi smeli prodajati 5 % drugih proizvodov s poreklom iz Argentine.
The Commission noted that it has identified and assessed the risks of cross-compensation in light of the circumstances of this case and the entirety of commitments.
Komisija je opozorila, da je opredelila in ocenila tveganja navzkrižne kompenzacije glede na okoliščine tega primera in vse zaveze.
That claim is thus rejected.
Zato je bila navedena trditev zavrnjena.
The EBB claimed that the undertaking offers should include a possibility of a review, including at the Commission's own initiative.
Odbor EBB je trdil, da bi morale ponudbe zavez vključevati možnost pregleda, tudi na lastno pobudo Komisije.
The Commission noted that the impact of changes in circumstances on the undertakings might be assessed in the future in the light of possible changes in circumstances.
Komisija je opozorila, da se učinek sprememb okoliščin na zaveze v prihodnosti lahko oceni glede na morebitne spremembe okoliščin.
The possibility of a review, mentioned in the undertaking offers, is in line with applicable provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037.
Možnost pregleda, navedena v ponudbah zavez, je v skladu z veljavnimi določbami Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037.
The EBB, VDB and COPA-Cogeca expressed fears that the Argentine exporting producers might not handle the undertakings in a fair and transparent way because of the history of the case.
Odbor EBB, združenje VDB in zveza COPA-COGECA so izrazili pomisleke, da argentinski proizvajalci izvozniki zaradi preteklosti zadeve morda ne bodo ravnali z zavezami na pošten in pregleden način.
The Commission noted that the undertaking offers stipulate that the acceptance of the undertakings by the Commission is based on trust and any action which would harm the relationship of trust established with the Commission shall justify the withdrawal of the undertakings.
Komisija je opozorila, da ponudbe zavez določajo, da Komisija sprejme zaveze na podlagi zaupanja, vsako dejanje, ki bi to zaupanje Komisije zlorabilo, pa bo imelo za posledico umik zavez.
The VDB claimed that because of the structure of the proposed undertakings it could lead to a breach of EU competition law.
Združenje VDB je trdilo, da bi zaradi strukture predlaganih zavez lahko prišlo do kršitve konkurenčnega prava EU.
The Commission noted that undertakings as form of measures are specifically provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/1037.
Komisija je opozorila, da so zaveze kot oblika ukrepov izrecno določene v Uredbi (EU) 2016/1037.
Furthermore, contrary to the VDB's allegation, the undertaking offers do not fix selling prices between the companies offering the undertakings at the level of the MIP, but introduce a floor price level below which imports cannot take place within the annual level covered by the undertakings.
Poleg tega v nasprotju s trditvijo združenja VDB ponudbe zavez ne določajo prodajnih cen med družbami, ki ponujajo zaveze na ravni minimalne uvozne cene, ampak uvajajo raven najnižje cene, pod katero uvoz ne more potekati na letni ravni, ki jo zaveze zajemajo.
The VDB claimed that given the negative experience the Commission had with a similarly structured undertaking concerning solar panels, it seems probable that the proposed undertaking offers would be ineffective.
Združenje VDB je trdilo, da se glede na negativne izkušnje, ki jih je Komisija imela s podobno strukturirano zavezo v zvezi s sončnimi paneli, zdi verjetno, da bodo predlagane ponudbe zavez neučinkovite.
The Commission carefully assessed the undertakings offered and concluded that they could be accepted.
Komisija je skrbno ocenila ponudbe zavez in sklenila, da bi jih bilo mogoče sprejeti.
The Commission took into account the entirety of the commitments made, among those for example, CARBIO's active role, and the safety net in the form of the annual level.
Pri tem je upoštevala vse zaveze, med drugim na primer aktivno vlogo zbornice CARBIO in varnostno mrežo v obliki letne ravni.
Implementation and withdrawal
Izvajanje in umik
Whenever, under Article 13(9) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1037, the Commission withdraws its acceptance of an undertaking following a breach by referring to particular transactions and declares the relevant undertaking invoices to be invalid, a customs debt is incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation.
Kadar Komisija v skladu s členom 13(9) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 po kršitvi umakne svoje sprejetje zaveze s sklicevanjem na določene transakcije ter razglasi zadevne račune na podlagi zaveze za neveljavne, nastane ob sprejetju deklaracije o sprostitvi v prosti promet carinski dolg.
At the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation, importers should be aware, as a normal trade risk, that a customs debt may become due, even if an undertaking offered by the manufacturer from whom they were buying, directly or indirectly, had been accepted by the Commission.
Uvozniki se morajo zavedati, da lahko v času sprejetja deklaracije o sprostitvi v prosti promet carinski dolg nastane kot del običajnega poslovnega tveganja, čeprav je Komisija zavezo, ki jo je ponudil proizvajalec, od katerega so neposredno ali posredno kupovali, sprejela.
Under Article 24(7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037, customs authorities should inform the Commission immediately whenever indications of a breach of the undertaking are found.
V skladu s členom 24(7) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 morajo carinski organi Komisijo obvestiti takoj, ko odkrijejo znake kršitve zaveze.
All interested parties, including the Union industry, are invited to provide the Commission with any necessary information that may be useful for monitoring purposes.
Vse zainteresirane strani, vključno z industrijo Unije, so pozvane, da Komisiji predložijo vse potrebne informacije, ki bi lahko bile koristne za namene spremljanja.
Such information may include, in particular, any relevant and representative data for the soybean oil price and the MIP that may facilitate the monitoring of the undertakings by the Commission.
Take informacije lahko vključujejo zlasti kakršne koli ustrezne in reprezentativne podatke v zvezi s ceno sojinega olja in minimalno uvozno ceno, ki bi lahko Komisiji olajšali spremljanje zavez.
In the event of a breach or withdrawal of the undertakings or in case of withdrawal of acceptance of the undertakings by the Commission, the definitive countervailing duty imposed in accordance with Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 is to automatically apply under Article 13(9) of that Regulation.
V primeru kršitve ali umika zavez ali kadar Komisija umakne sprejetje zavez, se v skladu s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 samodejno uporablja dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena v skladu s členom 13(9) navedene uredbe –
The undertakings offered by the exporting producers listed below together with the Argentine Chamber of Biofuels (Cámara Argentina de Biocombustibles, ‘CARBIO’), in connection with the anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina, are hereby accepted.
Zaveze, ki so jih v povezavi s protisubvencijskim postopkom v zvezi z uvozom biodizla s poreklom iz Argentine ponudili spodaj navedeni proizvajalci izvozniki skupaj z argentinsko zbornico za biogoriva (Cámara Argentina de Biocombustibles, v nadaljnjem besedilu: zbornica CARBIO), se sprejmejo.
Produced and sold by Aceitera General Deheza S.A. to the first independent customer in the Union acting as an importer.
Proizvaja in prodaja družba Bunge Argentina S.A. ali
Produced and sold by Bunge Argentina S.A. or
proizvaja družba Bunge Argentina S.A. in prodaja družba Bunge Agritrade S.A., Urugvaj, prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji, ki deluje kot uvoznik.
produced by Bunge Argentina S.A. and sold by Bunge Agritrade S.A., Uruguay, to the first independent customer in the Union acting as an importer
Proizvaja in prodaja družba LDC Argentina S.A. ali
Produced and sold by LDC Argentina S.A. or
proizvaja družba LDC Argentina S.A. in prodaja družba Louis Dreyfus Company Suisse S.A., Švica, prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji, ki deluje kot uvoznik.
produced by LDC Argentina S.A. and sold by Louis Dreyfus Company Suisse S.A., Switzerland, to the first independent customer in the Union acting as an importer.
Proizvaja in prodaja družba Molinos Agro S.A. ali
Produced and sold by Molinos Agro S.A. or
proizvaja družba Molinos Agro S.A in prodaja družba Molinos Overseas Commodities S.A., Urugvaj, prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji, ki deluje kot uvoznik.
produced by Molinos Agro S.A and sold by Molinos Overseas Commodities S.A., Uruguay, to the first independent customer in the Union acting as an importer.
Proizvaja in prodaja družba Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos S.A.C.I.F. y A prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji, ki deluje kot uvoznik.
Produced and sold by Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos S.A.C.I.F. y A to the first independent customer in the Union acting as an importer.
Proizvaja in prodaja družba Vicentin S.A.I.C. ali
Produced and sold by Vicentin S.A.I.C. or
proizvaja družba Vicentin S.A.I.C. in prodaja družba Vicentin S.A.I.C.
produced by Vicentin S.A.I.C. and sold by Vicentin S.A.I.C.
Sucursal, Urugvaj, prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji, ki deluje kot uvoznik.
Sucursal, Uruguay, to the first independent customer in the Union acting as an importer.
Proizvaja in prodaja družba Cargill S.A.C.I ali
Produced and sold by Cargill S.A.C.I or
proizvaja družba Cargill S.A.C.I. in prodaja družba Cargill International S.A., Švica, prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji, ki deluje kot uvoznik.
produced by Cargill S.A.C.I. and sold by Cargill International S.A., Switzerland, to the first independent customer in the Union EU acting as an importer.
Proizvaja in prodaja družba COFCO International Argentina S.A. ali
Produced and sold by COFCO International Argentina S.A. or
proizvaja družba COFCO International Argentina S.A. in prodaja družba Cofco Resources S.A., Švica, prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji, ki deluje kot uvoznik.
Produced by COFCO International Argentina S.A. and sold by Cofco Resources S.A., Switzerland, to the first independent customer in the Union acting as an importer.
Člen 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 11. februarja 2019
Done at Brussels, 11 February 2019.
Za Komisijo
The President
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 55.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 55.
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
UL C 34, 31.1.2018, str. 37.
OJ C 34, 31.1.2018, p. 37.
Direktiva (EU) 2015/1513 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. septembra 2015 o spremembi Direktive 98/70/ES o kakovosti motornega bencina in dizelskega goriva ter spremembi Direktive 2009/28/ES o spodbujanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov (UL L 239, 15.9.2015, str. 1).
Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 239, 15.9.2015, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1194/2013 z dne 19. novembra 2013 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije (UL L 315, 26.11.2013, str. 2).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/246
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2019/246
(notified under document C(2019) 1107)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2019) 1107)
The Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU was last amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/161, following recent instances of African swine fever in Romania.
Priloga k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije (EU) 2019/161, in sicer po nedavnih primerih afriške prašičje kuge v Romuniji.
Since the date of adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/161, there have been new instances of African swine fever in feral and domestic pigs in Poland and in domestic pigs in Romania that also need to be reflected in the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Od datuma sprejetja Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2019/161 so se pojavili novi primeri afriške prašičje kuge pri divjih in domačih prašičih na Poljskem ter pri domačih prašičih v Romuniji, kar bi bilo prav tako treba upoštevati v Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU.
In January 2019, an outbreak of African swine fever in domestic pigs was observed in the district of gołdapski in Poland in an area currently listed in Part II of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Januarja 2019 je bil ugotovljen en izbruh afriške prašičje kuge pri domačih prašičih v gołdapskem okrožju na Poljskem, ki je trenutno navedeno v delu II Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU.
This outbreak of African swine fever in domestic pigs constitutes an increased level of risk which should be reflected in that Annex.
Ta izbruh afriške prašičje kuge pri domačih prašičih pomeni povišanje stopnje tveganja, ki bi ga bilo treba upoštevati v navedeni prilogi.
Accordingly, this area of Poland affected by African swine fever should now be listed in Part III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Zato bi bilo treba to območje na Poljskem, prizadeto zaradi afriške prašičje kuge, zdaj navesti v delu III Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU.
In January 2019, a case of African swine fever in feral pig was observed in the district of elbląski in Poland in an area currently listed in Part I of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Januarja 2019 je bil ugotovljen en primer afriške prašičje kuge pri divjem prašiču v elblaškem okrožju na Poljskem, ki je trenutno navedeno v delu I Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU.
Accordingly, this area of Poland affected by African swine fever should now be listed in Part II of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU instead of in Part I thereof.
Zato bi bilo treba to območje na Poljskem, prizadeto zaradi afriške prašičje kuge, zdaj namesto v delu I navesti v delu II Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU.
In February 2019, an outbreak of African swine fever in domestic pigs was observed in the county of Covasna in Romania in an area currently listed in Part I of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Februarja 2019 je bil ugotovljen en izbruh afriške prašičje kuge pri domačih prašičih v okrožju Covasna v Romuniji, ki je trenutno navedeno v delu I Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU.
Accordingly, this area of Romania affected by African swine fever should now be listed in Part III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Zato bi bilo treba to območje v Romuniji, prizadeto zaradi afriške prašičje kuge, navesti v delu III Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU.
In order to take account of recent developments in the epidemiological evolution of African swine fever in the Union, and in order to combat the risks associated with the spread of that disease in a proactive manner, new high-risk areas of a sufficient size should be demarcated for Romania and Poland and duly listed in Parts I, II and III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Da bi se upoštevale nedavne spremembe pri epidemiološkem razvoju afriške prašičje kuge v Uniji in proaktivno obvladovala tveganja, povezana s širjenjem navedene bolezni, bi bilo treba v Romuniji in na Poljskem razmejiti dovolj velika nova območja z visokim tveganjem ter jih ustrezno navesti v delih I, II in III Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU.
In particular, given Part III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU lists the areas where the epidemiological situation is still evolving and very dynamic, when any amendments are made to areas listed in that Part, particular consideration must always be given to the effect on the surrounding areas.
Zlasti ker so v delu III Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU navedena območja, na katerih se epidemiološke razmere še vedno spreminjajo in so zelo dinamične, je treba ob kakršnih koli spremembah območij iz navedenega dela še posebej upoštevati vpliv na okoliška območja.
Done at Brussels, 11 February 2019.
V Bruslju, 11. februarja 2019
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/161 of 31 January 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (OJ L 31, 1.2.2019, p. 77).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2019/161 z dne 31. januarja 2019 o spremembi Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU o nadzornih ukrepih za zdravje živali v zvezi z afriško prašičjo kugo v nekaterih državah članicah (UL L 31, 1.2.2019, str. 77).