natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission should review the list of high risk third countries listed in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 at appropriate times in light of the progress made by those high risk third countries in removing the strategic deficiencies in their regime on anti-money laundering and countering terrorist financing (‘AML/CFT’).
Komisija bi morala v primernih intervalih ponovno pregledati seznam tretjih držav z visokim tveganjem, ki so navedene v Delegirani uredbi (EU) 2016/1675, in sicer z vidika napredka teh tretjih držav z visokim tveganjem pri odpravljanju strateških pomanjkljivosti v njihovih ureditvah za preprečevanje pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma (v nadaljnjem besedilu: AML/CFT).
The Commission should take account in its assessments of new information from international organisations and standard setters, such as those issued by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).
Komisija bi morala v svojih ocenah upoštevati nove informacije mednarodnih organizacij in organov za določanje standardov, kot so tiste, ki jih izda Projektna skupina za finančno ukrepanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: FATF).
In line with the criteria set out in Directive (EU) 2015/849, the Commission took into account the recent available information, in particular recent FATF Public Statements, FATF document ‘Improving Global AML/CFT Compliance: ongoing process’, and FATF reports of the International Cooperation Review Group in relation to the risks posed by individual third countries in line with Article 9(4) of Directive (EU) 2015/849.
V skladu z merili iz Direktive (EU) 2015/849 je Komisija upoštevala nedavne razpoložljive informacije, zlasti najnovejše javne izjave FATF in dokument FATF z naslovom „Izboljšanje skladnosti AML/CFT na svetovni ravni: stalen proces“ ter poročila FATF, ki jih je pripravila skupina za pregled mednarodnega sodelovanja v zvezi s tveganji, ki jih predstavljajo posamezne tretje države, v skladu s členom 9(4) Direktive (EU) 2015/849.
The FATF identified Pakistan as having strategic deficiencies in its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (‘AML/CFT’) regime that pose a risk to the international financial system, for which it has developed an action plan with the FATF.
FATF je Pakistan opredelila kot državo, ki ima v svoji ureditvi AML/CFT strateške pomanjkljivosti, ki ogrožajo mednarodni finančni sistem, za kar je ta država pripravila akcijski načrt s FATF.
The AML/CFT framework in force in Pakistan and the manner in which that framework is applied reveal strategic deficiencies.
Okvir AML/CFT, ki velja v Pakistanu, in način uporabe tega okvira razkrivata strateške pomanjkljivosti.
The deficiencies include the supervision and enforcement of AML/CFT controls by financial institutions, including money service businesses; insufficient measures to prevent illicit cross-border transportation of currency; no robust track record of terrorist financing investigations and prosecutions, including the lack of necessary coordination between various authorities; insufficient implementation of targeted financial sanctions and of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1267 (1999) and 1373 (2001); insufficient enforcement of prohibition of funds and financial services.
Pomanjkljivosti vključujejo nadzor in izvajanje nadzora glede AML/CFT s strani finančnih institucij, vključno s podjetji, ki opravljajo storitve v plačilnem prometu; nezadostne ukrepe za preprečevanje nezakonitega čezmejnega prenosa valute; nezadostne rezultate pri preiskavah financiranja terorizma in povezanem pregonu, vključno s pomanjkanjem potrebnega usklajevanja med različnimi organi; nezadostno izvajanje ciljnih finančnih sankcij in resolucij Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1267 (1999) in 1373 (2001) ter nezadostno izvrševanje prepovedi sredstev in finančnih storitev.
Considering the high level of integration of the international financial system, the close connection of market operators, the high volume of cross border transactions to or from the Union, as well as the degree of market opening, the Commission considers that any AML/CFT threat posed to the international financial system also represents a threat for the Union financial system.
Komisija glede na visoko raven integracije mednarodnega finančnega sistema, tesno povezanost udeležencev na trgu, velikost obsega čezmejnih transakcij v Unijo in iz nje ter stopnjo odprtosti trga šteje, da vsakršna grožnja AML/CFT za mednarodni finančni sistem obenem ogroža finančni sistem Unije.
In accordance with the latest relevant information, the Commission's analysis has concluded that Pakistan should be considered as a third-country jurisdiction which has strategic deficiencies in its AML/CFT regime that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union in accordance with the criteria set out in Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2015/849.
V skladu z najnovejšimi pomembnimi informacijami je analiza Komisije pokazala, da bi bilo treba Pakistan v skladu z merili iz člena 9 Direktive (EU) 2015/849 obravnavati kot jurisdikcijo tretje države, ki ima v svoji ureditvi AML/CFT strateške pomanjkljivosti, ki bistveno ogrožajo finančni sistem Unije.
However, this country has provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and has developed an action plan with the FATF, which would allow the requirements laid down in Directive (EU) 2015/849 to be met.
Vendar je navedena država predložila pisno politično zavezo na visoki ravni za odpravo ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti in pripravila akcijski načrt s FATF, ki bi omogočil izpolnitev zahtev iz Direktive (EU) 2015/849.
The Commission will reassess this country's status in the light of the implementation of that commitment.
Komisija bo ponovno ocenila status te države glede na izvajanje navedene zaveze.
In the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, in the table in point I the following line is added:
V Prilogi k Delegirani uredbi (EU) 2016/1675 se v preglednico v točki I vstavi naslednja vrstica:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1468
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/1468
of 1 October 2018
z dne 1. oktobra 2018
amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 461/2013 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in India
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 461/2013 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (‘the basic Regulation’) prior to its amendment by Regulation (EU) 2017/2321 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and in particular Article 19 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), preden je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (EU) 2017/2321 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, in zlasti člena 19 Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000, the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (‘PET’) originating, inter alia, in India (‘the original investigation’).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2603/2000 uvedel dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz polietilen tereftalata (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PET) s poreklom med drugim iz Indije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotna preiskava).
By Regulation (EC) No 1645/2005, the Council amended the level of countervailing measures in force against imports of PET from India, following an accelerated review pursuant to Article 20 of the basic Regulation.
Svet je po pospešenem pregledu v skladu s členom 20 osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 1645/2005 spremenil raven veljavnih izravnalnih ukrepov proti uvozu PET iz Indije.
By Regulation (EC) No 193/2007, the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty for a further period of five years, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Svet je po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 193/2007 uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev za nadaljnjih pet let.
By Regulation (EC) No 1286/2008 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 906/2011, the Council subsequently amended the countervailing measures, following partial interim reviews pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Svet je po delnih vmesnih pregledih v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 1286/2008 in Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 906/2011 nato spremenil izravnalne ukrepe.
In 2012, another partial interim review was terminated without amending the measures in force by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 559/2012.
Leta 2012 se je še en delni vmesni pregled zaključil brez spremembe veljavnih ukrepov z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 559/2012.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 461/2013, the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty for a further period of five years, following a second expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Svet je po drugem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 461/2013 uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev za nadaljnjih pet let.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1350, the Commission amended the countervailing measures, following two partial interim reviews pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po dveh delnih vmesnih pregledih v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/1350 spremenila izravnalne ukrepe.
By Decision 2000/745/EC, the Commission accepted a minimum import price offered by three exporting producers in India.
Komisija je s Sklepom 2000/745/ES sprejela ponudbe o zavezi treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Indije, v katerih je bila določena minimalna uvozna cena.
By Implementing Decision 2014/109/EU, the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertakings, due to a change in the circumstances under which the undertakings were accepted.
Komisija je z Izvedbenim sklepom 2014/109/EU umaknila sprejetje zavez zaradi spremenjenih okoliščin v primerjavi s tistimi, v katerih so bile zaveze sprejete.
The measures currently in force are a definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EU) No 461/2013, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1350 (‘measures in force’).
Trenutno veljavni ukrepi so dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo (EU) št. 461/2013, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/1350 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: veljavni ukrepi).
They consist of a specific countervailing duty, ranging between 0 and EUR 74,6 per tonne for individually named Indian producers, with a residual rate of EUR 69,4 per tonne imposed on imports from all other producers.
Veljavni ukrepi vključujejo posebno izravnalno dajatev, ki znaša od 0 do 74,6 EUR na tono za poimensko navedene indijske proizvajalce, in stopnjo preostale dajatve v višini 69,4 EUR na tono, uvedene na uvoz vseh drugih proizvajalcev.
In September 2016, an Indian exporting producer, Dhunseri Petrochem Limited (‘DPL’) requested the Commission to amend the Regulation imposing the measures in force based on a change of the name of the company.
Indijski proizvajalec izvoznik, družba Dhunseri Petrochem Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba DPL), je septembra 2016 od Komisije zahteval, naj zaradi spremembe imena družbe spremeni uredbo o uvedbi veljavnih ukrepov.
The request however showed that DPL had entered into a joint venture partnership with Indorama Ventures Public Company Limited (‘IVL’), resulting in the following structure:
Vendar je bilo iz zahtevka razvidno, da je družba DPL z družbo Indorama Ventures Public Company Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba IVL) začela enakovredno partnerstvo z naslednjo strukturo:
Indorama Ventures Global Services Limited, a subsidiary of IVL, acquired a 50 % stake in the PET resin business of DPL, through the establishment of a new company called IVL Dhunseri Petrochem Industries Limited (‘IVDPIL’);
Indorama Ventures Global Services Limited, ki je hčerinska družba družbe IVL, je z ustanovitvijo nove družbe, ki se zdaj imenuje IVL Dhunseri Petrochem Industries Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba IVDPIL), pridobila 50-odstotni delež v proizvodnji smole PET družbe DPL;
DPL acquired a 50 % stake in Micro Polypet Pvt.
družba DPL je pridobila 50-odstotni delež v družbi Micro Polypet Pvt.
Ltd (‘MPPL’), an Indian manufacturer of PET which had never exported to the EU and did not have an individual countervailing duty.
Ltd. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba MPPL), indijskem proizvajalcu PET, ki ni nikoli izvažal v EU in nima individualnih stopenj izravnalne dajatve.
In light of the above, the Commission considered that there was sufficient evidence that the circumstances with regard to subsidisation of DPL and its related companies had changed significantly and were of a lasting nature and that the measures should therefore be reviewed.
Glede na navedeno je Komisija menila, da so na voljo zadostni dokazi o tem, da so se okoliščine glede subvencioniranja družbe DPL in njenih povezanih družb znatno spremenile in da so te spremembe trajne, zaradi česar je treba ukrepe pregledati.
On that basis, the Commission announced, by notice on 6 July 2017 the decision to initiate on its own initiative a partial interim review investigation pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation limited in scope to the examination of subsidisation for DPL and its related companies in India.
Na tej podlagi je Komisija z obvestilom z dne 6. julija 2017 sporočila svojo odločitev, da na lastno pobudo začne preiskavo v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe, omejeno na preučitev subvencioniranja družbe DPL in njenih povezanih družb v Indiji.
The purpose of the review is to establish the rate of subsidisation for the company's new structure.
Namen tega pregleda je določitev stopnje subvencioniranja za novo strukturo družbe.
Another Indian exporting producer, Reliance Industries Limited (‘Reliance’) lodged a request for a partial interim review pursuant Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Drug indijski proizvajalec izvoznik, družba Reliance Industries Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Reliance), je vložil zahtevo za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
The request was limited to the examination of the subsidisation of Reliance.
Zahtevek je bil omejen na proučitev subvencioniranja družbe Reliance.
Reliance provided sufficient evidence that the continued application of the measures at their current level was no longer necessary to offset the countervailable subsidisation.
Družba Reliance je predložila ustrezne dokaze, da nadaljnja uporaba ukrepov na sedanji ravni ni več potrebna kompenziranje subvencije, proti kateri se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
The company alleged in particular that the overall subsidy level was reduced due to the termination of applicability of the Focus Product Scheme and the Focus Market Scheme and the reduction of amounts availed by the applicant with regard to other schemes, like the Advanced Authorisation Scheme and the Duty Drawback Scheme.
Družba je trdila zlasti, da se je splošna stopnja subvencije znižala zaradi izteka sheme usmeritve v izdelek in sheme usmeritve v trg ter zmanjšanja zneskov, ki jih je vložnik prejemal iz drugih shem, kot sta shema vnaprejšnjih odobritev in shema za povračilo dajatev.
Having determined that the request contained sufficient evidence, the Commission announced, on 6 July 2017, the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation limited in scope to the examination of subsidisation for Reliance.
Komisija je po ugotovitvi, da zahtevek vsebuje ustrezne dokaze, 6. julija 2017 napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe, omejenega na proučitev subvencioniranja družbe Reliance.
In both Notices of initiation, the Commission announced that the investigations would also assess the appropriateness to amend the rate of duty imposed on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in India by ‘all other companies’ in India.
Komisija je v obeh obvestilih o začetku napovedala, da bo v preiskavah proučila tudi, ali bi bilo treba spremeniti stopnjo dajatve za uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije za „vse druge družbe“ v Indiji.
Given that both interim reviews cover the same product under review, the same country of origin and the same investigation period, and as both measures are subject to the same proceeding, it was considered appropriate to conclude both reviews in the same legal act.
Ker se oba vmesna pregleda nanašata na isti izdelek, ki se pregleduje, isto državo porekla in isto obdobje preiskave ter ker se bo za oba ukrepa izvedel isti postopek, se je zdelo primerno, da se oba pregleda izvedeta v istem pravnem aktu.
The Commission officially informed Dhunseri, its related companies and Reliance (‘the concerned exporting producers’), the association of Union producers, importers and users in the Union known to be concerned and the representatives of the exporting country of the initiation of the partial interim reviews.
Komisija je o začetku delnih vmesnih pregledov uradno obvestila družbo Dhunseri, njene povezane družbe in družbo Reliance (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki), združenje proizvajalcev Unije, uvoznike in uporabnike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike zadevne države izvoznice.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notices of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in da v roku, ki je določen v obvestilih o začetku, zahtevajo zaslišanje.
In order to obtain the information deemed necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent questionnaires to the concerned exporting producers and the Government of India (‘GOI’) and received replies within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Komisija je zadevnim proizvajalcem izvoznikom in indijski vladi poslala vprašalnike, da bi dobila informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za njeno preiskavo, ti pa so izpolnjene vprašalnike vrnili v predpisanem roku.
The Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of IVDPIL in Kolkata, at MPPL's headquarters in Delhi, at MPPL's factory in Karnal, at Reliance in Mumbai as well as at the premises of the GOI in New Delhi (Directorate-General of Foreign Trade and Ministry of Commerce).
Komisija je opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih družbe IVDPIL v Kalkuti, na sedežu družbe MPPL v Delhiju, v tovarni družbe MPPL v Karnalu ter prostorih družbe Reliance v Mumbaju in indijske vlade v New Delhiju (generalni direktorat za zunanjo trgovino in ministrstvo za trgovino).
The investigation of subsidisation covered the period from 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017 (‘the review investigation period’).
Preiskava subvencioniranja je zajemala obdobje od 1. aprila 2016 do 31. marca 2017 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom).
On 25 July 2018 the GOI and the other interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations upon which the Commission intended to propose to amend the duty rates applicable to the Dhunseri and Reliance.
Dne 25. julija 2018 so bile indijska vlada in druge zainteresirane strani obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in vidikih, na podlagi katerih je Komisija nameravala predlagati spremembo stopenj dajatev, ki se uporabljajo za družbi Dhunseri in Reliance.
Reliance noted that the disclosure was made more than 12 months after initiation of the investigation and referred to Article 11.11 of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (‘the ASCM’) which provides that investigations ‘shall’ be concluded within one year ‘except in special circumstances’ and to Article 22(1) of the basic Regulation which provides that reviews shall be carried out ‘expeditiously’ and ‘shall normally’ be concluded within 12 months of the date of initiation.
Družba Reliance je opozorila, da so bili dokumenti o razkritju poslani več kot 12 mesecev po začetku preiskave in po roku iz člena 11.11 Sporazuma STO o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum SCM), ki določa, da „se“ preiskave „razen v izjemnih primerih“ končajo v enem letu, in iz člena 22(1) osnovne uredbe, ki določa, da se pregledi izvedejo „čim hitreje“ in se „običajno“ zaključijo v 12 mesecih od datuma začetka pregleda.
On this basis Reliance claimed that in the absence of special circumstances or justification from the Commission the investigation should be ‘terminated without protective measures’.
Na podlagi tega je družba Reliance trdila, da bi bilo treba preiskavo, če ne obstajajo posebne okoliščine ali Komisija tega ni utemeljila, „zaključiti brez zaščitnih ukrepov“.
However, as far as deadlines are concerned, the Commission observes that the present review investigation is subject to Article 21.4 of the ASCM which provides that reviews of countervailing duties ‘shall normally be concluded within 12 months of the date of initiation of the review’ and does not refer to any special circumstances needed to justify an investigation duration longer than 12 months.
Vendar glede rokov Komisija ugotavlja, da se za to preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom uporablja člen 21.4 Sporazuma SCM, v katerem je določeno, da se pregledi izravnalnih dajatev „opravi[jo] […] v normalnih razmerah v 12 mesecih od dneva, ko je proučitev sprožena“, in niso navedene posebne okoliščine, potrebne za utemeljitev trajanja preiskave, daljšega od 12 mesecev.
Likewise, Article 22(1) of the basic Regulation does not refer to special circumstances needed to justify an investigation duration longer than 12 months.
Podobno v členu 22(1) osnovne uredbe niso navedene posebne okoliščine, potrebne za utemeljitev trajanja preiskave, daljšega od 12 mesecev.
The current reviews are conducted within the 15-month deadline set out in Article 22(1) of the basic Regulation.
Ta pregleda sta se izvedla v 15-mesečnem roku iz člena 22(1) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, the claim was rejected.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
The product subject to this review is polyethylene terephthalate (PET) having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, currently falling within CN code 39076100 and originating in India (‘the product under review’).
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je polietilen tereftalat (PET) z viskoznim številom 78 ml/g ali več in je v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5.
Like product
Trenutno se uvršča pod oznako KN 39076100 in je s poreklom iz Indije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: izdelek, ki se pregleduje).
The investigation revealed that the product under review is identical in terms of physical and chemical characteristics and uses to the product produced and sold on the domestic market in India.
Podobni izdelek
It is therefore concluded that products sold on the domestic and export markets are like products within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je razkrila, da ima izdelek, ki se pregleduje, enake fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter uporabe kot izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Indije.
RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION
Zato se sklene, da so izdelki, ki se prodajajo na domačem trgu in izvoznih trgih, podobni izdelki v smislu člena 2(c) osnovne uredbe.
Re-organisation of DPL and its related companies
REZULTATI PREISKAVE
The investigation confirmed that DPL entered into a joint venture partnership with IVL.
Reorganizacija družbe DPL in njenih povezanih družb
Under this partnership, DPL transferred its entire PET production facility to a new company, IVDPIL on 1 April 2016 and acquired 50 % share of that company, while the remaining 50 % were acquired by Indorama Ventures Global Services Limited, a subsidiary of IVL.
Preiskava je potrdila, da je družba DPL stopila v enakovredno partnerstvo z družbo IVL.