natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
AUTHORISED USE(S) OF THE META SPC 9
Navodila za uporabo, ukrepi za zmanjšanje tveganja in druga navodila za uporabo iz tega oddelka veljajo za vse dovoljene uporabe v okviru proizvodov, zajetih v meta SPC8.
Table 30.
Navodila za uporabo, ukrepi za zmanjšanje tveganja in druga navodila za uporabo iz tega oddelka veljajo za vse dovoljene uporabe v okviru proizvodov, zajetih v meta SPC9.
Table 31.
CVAS Development GmbH
Table 32.
Proizvajalec(-ci) biocidnih proizvodov
Use chemical resistant gloves (glove material to be specified by the authorisation holder within the product information), coverall and chemical resistant boots during post-milking teat disinfection by manual spraying using a trigger sprayer.
Ime proizvajalca
Table 33.
Dr. Albert Reimann Str.
Use chemical resistant gloves (glove material to be specified by the authorisation holder within the product information) during post-milking teat disinfection by manual spraying using an electronic sprayer.
16a 68526 Ladenburg Nemčija
Table 34.
Polivinilpirolidon jod
Table 35.
Kanister (HDPE): 5 – 60 kg
Table 36.
Sod (HDPE): 60 – 200 kg
GENERAL DIRECTIONS FOR USE OF THE META SPC 9
Metode ravnanja z odpadki: Nevarni odpadki (klasifikacijska številka odpadka).
THIRD INFORMATION LEVEL: INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTS IN THE META SPC 9
Identifikator meta SPC 6
Instructions for use, risk mitigation measures and other directions for use under this section are valid for any authorised uses within the meta SPC1.
SESTAVA META SPC 6
Instructions for use, risk mitigation measures and other directions for use under this section are valid for any authorised uses within the meta SPC2.
Kvalitativna in kvantitativna informacija o sestavi meta SPC 6
Instructions for use, risk mitigation measures and other directions for use under this section are valid for any authorised uses within the meta SPC3.
STAVKI O NEVARNOSTI IN PREVIDNOSTNI STAVKI V META SPC 6
Instructions for use, risk mitigation measures and other directions for use under this section are valid for any authorised uses within the meta SPC4.
DOVOLJENA(-E) UPORABA(-E) META SPC 6
Instructions for use, risk mitigation measures and other directions for use under this section are valid for any authorised uses within the meta SPC5.
Ocetna kislina
Instructions for use, risk mitigation measures and other directions for use under this section are valid for any authorised uses within the meta SPC6.
64-19-7 200-580-7
Instructions for use, risk mitigation measures and other directions for use under this section are valid for any authorised uses within the meta SPC7.
META SPC 7
Instructions for use, risk mitigation measures and other directions for use under this section are valid for any authorised uses within the meta SPC8.
meta SPC 7
Manufacturer(s) of the biocidal products Name of manufacturer
Norkem Limited (manufacturer of PVP- Jod)
Calvatis GmbH
0,26 META SPC 9
Polyvinylpyrrolidone iodine
Identifikator meta SPC 7
Regulation (EU) 2018/1860 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2018/1860 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals
o uporabi schengenskega informacijskega sistema za vračanje nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 79(2)(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 79(2)(c) Pogodbe,
The return of third-country nationals who do not fulfil or no longer fulfil the conditions for entry, stay or residence in the Member States, in full respect of fundamental rights and in particular the principle of non-refoulement, and in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, is an essential part of the comprehensive efforts to tackle irregular migration and increase the rate of return of irregular migrants.
Vračanje državljanov tretjih držav, ki ne izpolnjujejo ali ne izpolnjujejo več pogojev za vstop, bivanje ali prebivanje v državah članicah, ob doslednem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic in zlasti načela nevračanja (non-refoulement) ter v skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta je bistven del obsežnih prizadevanj za boj proti nedovoljenim migracijam in povečanje števila vrnjenih migrantov brez urejenega statusa.
It is necessary to increase the effectiveness of the Union system to return illegally staying third-country nationals.
Treba je povečati učinkovitost sistema Unije za vračanje nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav.
This is essential for maintaining public trust in the Union migration and asylum policy and providing support to persons in need of international protection.
To je ključno za ohranitev zaupanja javnosti v politiko Unije na področju migracij in azila ter za zagotavljanje podpore osebam, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito.
Member States should take all necessary measures to return illegally staying third-country nationals in an effective and proportionate manner, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2008/115/EC.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za vrnitev nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav na učinkovit in sorazmeren način ter v skladu z določbami Direktive 2008/115/ES.
Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council lay down the conditions for the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS).
Uredba (EU) 2018/1861 in Uredba (EU) 2018/1862 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta določata pogoje za vzpostavitev, delovanje in uporabo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS).
A system should be established for sharing information between Member States that use SIS pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 concerning return decisions issued in respect of third-country nationals staying illegally on the territory of the Member States and for monitoring whether third-country nationals subject to those decisions have left the territory of the Member States.
Vzpostaviti bi bilo treba sistem, ki bo državam članicam, ki uporabljajo SIS v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2018/1861, omogočal izmenjavo informacij o odločbah o vrnitvi, izdanih državljanom tretjih držav, ki nezakonito prebivajo na ozemlju držav članic, ter spremljanje, ali so državljani tretjih držav, ki so jim bile navedene odločbe izdane, zapustili ozemlje držav članic.
This Regulation does not affect the rights and obligations of third-country nationals laid down in Directive 2008/115/EC.
Ta uredba ne vpliva na pravice in obveznosti državljanov tretjih držav, določene v Direktivi 2008/115/ES.
An alert entered into SIS for the purpose of return does not, in itself, constitute a determination of the status of the third-country national on the territory of Member States, especially in Member States other than the Member State which entered the alert into SIS.
Razpis ukrepa, vnesen v SIS za namene vračanja, sam po sebi ne pomeni določitve statusa državljana tretje države na ozemlju držav članic, zlasti ne v državah članicah, ki niso država članica, ki je vnesla razpis ukrepa v SIS.
Alerts on return entered into SIS and the exchange of supplementary information concerning those alerts should support competent authorities to take the necessary measures to enforce return decisions.
Razpisi ukrepov za vrnitev, vneseni v SIS, in izmenjava dopolnilnih informacij o teh razpisih ukrepov bi morala pristojnim organom pomagati sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za izvršitev odločb o vrnitvi.
SIS should contribute to the identification of and the information sharing between Member States on third-country nationals who are subject to such a return decision, who have absconded and are apprehended in another Member State.
SIS bi moral prispevati k identifikaciji državljanov tretjih držav, ki jim je bila izdana taka odločba o vrnitvi, in k izmenjavi informacij med državami članicami o takih državljanih tretjih držav, ki so pobegnili in bili prijeti v drugi državi članici.
Those measures should help prevent and deter irregular migration and secondary movements and enhance cooperation between Member States' authorities.
Ti ukrepi bi morali pomagati preprečevati nedovoljene migracije in sekundarna gibanja in od njih odvračati ter izboljšati sodelovanje med organi držav članic.
To ensure the effectiveness of return and increase the added value of alerts on return, Member States should enter alerts into SIS in relation to return decisions they issue in respect of illegally staying third-country nationals in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC.
Da se zagotovi učinkovito vračanje in da bi imeli razpisi ukrepov za vrnitev večjo dodano vrednost, bi morale države članice za odločbe o vrnitvi, ki jih izdajo v zvezi z nezakonito prebivajočimi državljani tretjih držav v skladu z določbami skladno z Direktivo 2008/115/ES, vnesti razpise ukrepov v SIS.
For this purpose, Member States should also enter an alert into SIS when decisions imposing or stating an obligation to return are issued in the situations described in Article 2(2) of that Directive, namely to third-country nationals who are subject to a refusal of entry in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council, or who are apprehended or intercepted by the competent authorities in connection with the irregular crossing by land, sea or air of the external border of a Member State and who have not subsequently obtained an authorisation or a right to stay in that Member State, and to third-country nationals who are subject to return as a criminal law sanction or as a consequence of a criminal law sanction, according to national law, or who are the subject of extradition procedures.
V ta namen bi morale države članice razpis ukrepa v SIS vnesti tudi takrat, kadar v primerih, opisanih v členu 2(2) navedene direktive, izdajo odločbe, ki nalagajo ali navajajo obveznost vrnitve, in sicer državljanom tretjih držav, ki jim je bil v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta zavrnjen vstop ali ki so jih pristojni organi prijeli ali prestregli v povezavi z nedovoljenim prestopom kopenske, morske ali zračne zunanje meje države članice in po tem niso pridobili dovoljenja za prebivanje ali pravice do prebivanja v tej državi članici, in državljanom tretjih držav, ki se morajo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom vrniti zaradi kazenske sankcije ali zaradi posledice kazenske sankcije ali pa so v postopku izročitve.
In certain circumstances, Member States may refrain from entering alerts on return into SIS where the risk of the return decision not being complied with is low, namely during any period of detention or when the return decision is issued at the external border and is executed immediately, in order to reduce their administrative burden.
V določenih okoliščinah, kadar ni velike nevarnosti, da odločba o vrnitvi ne bi bila upoštevana, in sicer v obdobju pridržanja ali ko se odločba o vrnitvi izda na zunanji meji in se takoj izvrši, in da bi zmanjšale svoje upravno breme, se lahko države članice odločijo, da ne vnesejo razpisov ukrepov za vrnitev v SIS.
This Regulation should set out common rules for entering alerts on return into SIS.
S to uredbo bi bilo treba določiti skupna pravila za vnos razpisov ukrepov za vrnitev v SIS.
Alerts on return should be entered into SIS as soon as the underlying return decisions are issued.
Razpisi ukrepov za vrnitev bi se morali vnesti v SIS takoj, ko so izdane odločbe o vrnitvi, na katerih temeljijo.
The alert should indicate whether a period for voluntary departure has been granted to the third-country national concerned, including whether such period has been extended and whether the decision has been suspended or removal has been postponed.
V razpisu ukrepa bi moralo biti navedeno, ali je bilo zadevnemu državljanu tretje države odobreno obdobje za prostovoljni odhod, vključno s tem, ali je bilo tako obdobje podaljšano, ter ali je bila odločba začasno odložena oziroma ali je bila odstranitev odložena.
It is necessary to determine the categories of data to be entered into SIS in respect of a third-country national who is the subject of a return decision.
Treba je določiti kategorije podatkov, ki se vnesejo v SIS v zvezi z državljanom tretje države, ki mu je bila izdana odločba o vrnitvi.
Alerts on return should contain only those data that are necessary to identify the data subjects, to allow the competent authorities to take informed decisions without losing time and to ensure, where necessary, the protection of those authorities from persons who are, for example, armed, violent, have escaped or are involved in an activity as referred to in Articles 3 to 14 of Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Razpisi ukrepov za vrnitev bi morali vključevati le tiste podatke, ki so potrebni za identifikacijo posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, da bi lahko pristojni organi hitro sprejemali informirane odločitve ter da bi se, kadar je potrebno, zagotovila zaščita teh organov pred osebami, ki so na primer oborožene, nasilne, na begu ali udeležene v kateri koli dejavnosti iz členov 3 do 14 Direktive (EU) 2017/541 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Furthermore, in order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert should include also a reference to the identification document of the person concerned and a copy of that document, where available.
Za olajšanje identifikacije in odkrivanja več identitet bi moral razpis ukrepa vsebovati tudi sklic na identifikacijski dokument zadevne osebe in, kadar je na voljo, kopijo tega dokumenta.
Given the reliability of identifying persons using fingerprints and photographs or facial images, they should always be inserted in alerts on return.
Ker je osebe mogoče zanesljivo identificirati na podlagi prstnih odtisov, fotografij ali podobe obraza, bi morali biti ti vedno vključeni v razpise ukrepov za vrnitev.
As they may not be available, for example, when a return decision is taken in absentia, it should exceptionally be possible to derogate from this requirement in such cases.
Če niso na voljo, na primer kadar se odločba o vrnitvi izda v odsotnosti, bi moralo biti v takih primerih izjemoma mogoče odstopati od te zahteve.
The exchange of supplementary information provided by the national competent authorities on third-country nationals subject to alerts on return, should always be carried out through the network of national offices called SIRENE Bureaux serving as point of contact and in accordance with Articles 7 and 8 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1861.
Izmenjava dopolnilnih informacij, ki jih zagotovijo pristojni nacionalni organi o državljanih tretjih držav, za katere je bil izdan razpis ukrepa za vrnitev, bi morala vedno potekati preko mreže nacionalnih uradov z imenom uradi SIRENE, ki delujejo kot kontaktna točka, in v skladu s členoma 7 in 8 Uredbe (EU) 2018/1861.
Procedures should be established to enable Member States to verify that the obligation to return has been complied with and to confirm the departure of the third-country national concerned to the Member State that entered the alert on return into SIS.
Vzpostaviti bi bilo treba postopke, ki državam članicam omogočajo, da preverijo, ali je bila obveznost vrnitve izpolnjena, in državi članici, ki je vnesla razpis ukrepa za vrnitev v SIS, potrdijo odhod zadevnega državljana tretje države.
This information should contribute to more comprehensive monitoring of the compliance with return decisions.
Te informacije bi morale prispevati k celovitejšemu spremljanju spoštovanja odločb o vrnitvi.
Alerts on return should be deleted as soon as the Member State or competent authority that issued the return decision receives confirmation that the return has taken place or where the competent authority has sufficient and convincing information that the third-country national has left the territory of the Member States.
Razpise ukrepov za vrnitev bi bilo treba izbrisati, takoj ko država članica ali pristojni organ, ki je izdal odločbo o vrnitvi, prejme potrditev, da je bila vrnitev izvedena, ali, kadar ima pristojni organ zadostne in prepričljive informacije, da je državljan tretje države zapustil ozemlje držav članic.
Where a return decision is accompanied by an entry ban, an alert for refusal of entry and stay should be entered into SIS in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1861.
Kadar odločbo o vrnitvi spremlja prepoved vstopa, bi se moral razpis ukrepov za prepoved vstopa ali prebivanja vnesti v SIS v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2018/1861.
In such cases Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure that no time-gap exists between the moment in which the third-country national leaves the Schengen area and the activation of the alert for refusal of entry and stay in SIS.
V takih primerih bi morale države članice sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da med trenutkom, ko državljan tretje države zapusti schengensko območje, in aktivacijo razpisa ukrepa za prepoved vstopa ali prebivanja v SIS ni časovne vrzeli.
If the data contained in SIS show that the return decision is accompanied by an entry ban, the enforcement of the entry ban should be ensured.
Če je iz podatkov, vsebovanih v SIS, razvidno, da odločbo o vrnitvi spremlja prepoved vstopa, bi morala biti zagotovljena izvršitev prepovedi vstopa.
SIS should contain a mechanism for notifying the Member States of the non-compliance of third-country nationals with an obligation to return within a given period of voluntary departure.
SIS bi moral vsebovati mehanizem za obveščanje držav članic o tem, da državljani tretjih držav niso izpolnili obveznosti vrnitve v danem obdobju za prostovoljni odhod.
The mechanism should support the Member States in fulfilling their obligations to enforce return decisions and their obligations to issue an entry ban in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC with regard to third-country nationals who have not complied with an obligation to return.
Mehanizem bi moral državam članicam pomagati pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti izvrševanja odločb o vrnitvi in obveznosti izdaje prepovedi vstopa v skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES v zvezi z državljani tretjih držav, ki niso izpolnili obveznosti vrnitve.
This Regulation should establish mandatory rules for consultation between Member States to avoid or reconcile conflicting instructions.
S to uredbo bi se morala določiti obvezna pravila za posvetovanje med državami članicami, da bi se izognili morebitnim nasprotujočim si navodilom ali bi jih uskladili.
Consultations should be carried out where third-country nationals who hold, or are being granted, a valid residence permit or a long-stay visa by a Member State are subject to an alert on return issued by another Member State, in particular if the return decision is accompanied by an entry ban, or where conflicting situations may arise at entry in the territories of the Member States.
Posvetovanja bi se morala opraviti, kadar ima državljan tretje države veljavno dovoljenje za prebivanje ali vizum za dolgoročno prebivanje v državi članici ali bi mu naj bilo takšno dovoljenje ali vizum odobren, druga država članica pa je v zvezi z njim izdala razpis ukrepa za vrnitev, zlasti če odločbo o vrnitvi spremlja prepoved vstopa, ali kadar bi pri vstopu na ozemlje držav članic lahko prišlo do spora.
Alerts should be kept in SIS only for the time required to fulfil the purposes for which they were entered.
Razpisi ukrepov bi se morali v SIS hraniti le toliko časa, kolikor je potrebno za izpolnitev namena, za katerega so bili vneseni.
The relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 on review periods should apply.
Uporabljati bi se morale ustrezne določbe Uredbe (EU) 2018/1861 o rokih za preverjanje.
Alerts on return should be automatically deleted as soon as they expire, in accordance with the review procedure referred to in that Regulation.
Razpise ukrepov za vrnitev bi bilo treba samodejno izbrisati takoj po izteku veljavnosti v skladu s postopkom za preverjanje iz navedene Uredbe.
Personal data obtained by a Member State pursuant to this Regulation should not be transferred or made available to any third country.
Osebni podatki, ki jih država članica pridobi v skladu s to uredbo, se ne bi smeli prenesti v nobeno tretjo državo ali se ji dati na voljo.
As a derogation to that rule, it should be possible to transfer such personal data to a third country where the transfer is subject to strict conditions and is necessary in individual cases in order to assist with the identification of a third-country national for the purposes of his or her return.
Z odstopanjem od tega pravila bi moralo biti mogoče takšne osebne podatke prenesti v tretjo državo, kadar za prenos veljajo strogi pogoji in je to potrebno v posameznih primerih za pomoč pri identifikaciji državljana tretje države za namene njegove vrnitve.
The transfer of any personal data to third countries should be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council and be conducted with the agreement of the issuing Member State.
Prenos kakršnih koli osebnih podatkov v tretje države bi se moral izvesti v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/679 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta in s soglasjem države članice, ki je izdala razpis ukrepa.
It should be noted however, that third countries of return are often not subject to adequacy decisions adopted by the Commission under Article 45 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da za tretje države vrnitve pogosto ne veljajo sklepi o ustreznosti, ki jih je Komisija sprejela v skladu s členom 45 Uredbe (EU) 2016/679.
Furthermore, the extensive efforts of the Union in cooperating with the main countries of origin of illegally-staying third-country nationals subject to an obligation to return has not been able to ensure the systematic fulfilment by such third countries of the obligation established by international law to readmit their own nationals.
Poleg tega kljub obsežnim prizadevanjem Unije, da bi vzpostavila sodelovanje z glavnimi državami izvora nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav, za katere velja obveznost vrnitve, ni bilo mogoče zagotoviti, da bi takšne tretje države sistematično izpolnjevale obveznost ponovnega sprejema svojih državljanov, ki jo določa mednarodno pravo.
Readmission agreements that have been concluded or are being negotiated by the Union or the Member States and which provide for appropriate safeguards for the transfer of data to third countries pursuant to Article 46 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 cover a limited number of such third countries.
Sporazumi o ponovnem sprejemu, ki so jih sklenile ali o katerih se pogajajo Unija ali države članice in ki zagotavljajo ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe za prenos podatkov v tretje države v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (EU) 2016/679, zajemajo omejeno število takšnih tretjih držav.
Conclusion of any new agreement remains uncertain.
Sklenitev morebitnih novih sporazumov je še naprej vprašljiva.
In those circumstances, and as an exception to the requirement for an adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards, transfer of personal data to third-country authorities pursuant to this Regulation should be allowed for the purposes of implementing the return policy of the Union.
V teh okoliščinah in kot izjema od zahteve za sklep o ustreznosti ali ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe bi moral biti prenos osebnih podatkov organom tretjih držav v skladu s to uredbo dovoljen za namene izvajanja politike vračanja Unije.
It should be possible to use the derogation provided for in Article 49 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, subject to the conditions set out in that Article.
Omogočiti bi se morala uporaba odstopanja iz člena 49 Uredbe (EU) 2016/679, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz navedenega člena.
Under Article 57 of that Regulation, implementation of that Regulation, including with regard to transfers of personal data to third countries pursuant to this Regulation, should be subject to monitoring by independent supervisory authorities.
V skladu s členom 57 navedene uredbe bi morali izvajanje navedene uredbe, vključno kar zadeva prenose osebnih podatkov v tretje države v skladu s to uredbo, spremljati neodvisni nadzorni organi.