natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Those findings further confirm that network operators would not all on their own motion ‘purchase’ the stable load from baseload consumers, and none of them at the price of a full exemption.
V resnici vključuje med 35 % in 50 % obremenitve sistema (po odklopu črpalk).
Second, even assuming that in some cases the network operators would have actively purchased the alleged service, they would have procured it only to the limit necessary to facilitate the management of the grid and against a price reflecting the differentiated contribution to stability.
Nazadnje, zdi se, da nekatere zainteresirane strani želijo povedati, da morajo pasovni odjemalci pri priključitvi na omrežje izpolnjevati posebne tehnične zahteve in da naj bi morali za izpolnjevanje teh zahtev vlagati v naprave, ki izboljšujejo stabilnost omrežja, ker zagotavljajo jalovo moč, za kar pa ne prejemajo nadomestila.
By contrast, the full exemption is granted to baseload consumers reaching 7000 hours of full use and exceeding 10 GWh without consideration being given to either the network level at which they are connected, or their effective contribution to the stability of the networks, or the fact that there might already be enough of those baseload consumers to enable a stable management of the network.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da se popolna oprostitev ne more šteti za nadomestilo za to domnevno storitev, ki bi ga plačal udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu.
Also, if stable demand (rather than cost reduction) were the key to the safe management of the network, there is no reason to exclude from the exemption stable consumers consuming less than 10 GWh.
Položaj, ki ga opisujejo zainteresirane strani, namreč ne ustreza storitvi, ki bi jo kupili operaterji omrežja.
Third, it is noted that German Courts also concluded that the full exemption could not be seen as the payment for a service first because for many baseload consumers the ‘service’ merely corresponded to their normal consumption mode and second because the full exemption did not take into consideration the concrete stability increase delivered.
Ustreza tehnični zahtevi, ki jo morajo izpolnjevati odjemalci, da so lahko priključeni na omrežje.
According to those Courts, only a reduction taking into account the concrete impact of each baseload consumer on the network could have been justified (see recitals 52 and 52).
Zlasti morajo zagotoviti, da njihov faktor premika ostane med – 0,9 in + 0,9.
Part of the interested parties based the argument that the full exemption corresponded to the payment that a market operator would make to buy baseload consumers' service on the 2012 Study (see recital 59 of this Decision).
Odvisno od okoliščin mora odjemalec zato morda res vlagati v posebno opremo, ki zagotavlja, da njihov faktor premika ostaja med predpisanima vrednostma.
It is observed, first, that the exemption has been introduced by a regulatory act, by the State acting in its capacity as regulatory authority.
To se ne more šteti za storitev, zagotovljeno omrežju, temveč pomeni preventivni ukrep za preprečevanje večjih motenj v omrežju.
In that regard, it is necessary to apply the most recent case-law of the General Court, EDF v Commission.
Če odjemalci, vključno s pasovnimi odjemalci, ne bi izpolnjevali te tehnične zahteve, bi bili odgovorni za znatne napetostne motnje v omrežju.
According to that judgment, the Member State needs to demonstrate, where it invokes the MEOP, that its regulatory decision was taken in its capacity as shareholder, and not in its capacity as public authority.
Zainteresirane strani same priznavajo, da je ta zahteva potrebna za zagotavljanje varnega upravljanja omrežja.
In the present case, Germany (at federal level) has no shareholding in the network operators.
Poleg tega se tehnične zahteve uporabljajo za katerega koli odjemalca, ki zahteva priključitev na zadevno omrežje, in ne posebej za pasovne odjemalce, zato bi oprostitev, tudi če bi se lahko štela za „nadomestilo“ (kar pa ni), kljub temu pomenila selektivno prednost, ker bi bila omejena na pasovne odjemalce in izključena za vse druge odjemalce, za katere velja ista zahteva.
In any event, Germany has not submitted any documents that would indicate that it took into consideration shareholdings of regional and local authorities in the network operators.
OBSTOJ SELEKTIVNE PREDNOSTI
Germany has, indeed, not produced any contemporaneous evidence showing any commercial considerations, nor have interested parties.
Zainteresirane strani in Nemčija trdijo, da popolna oprostitev ne pomeni selektivne prednosti, ker je ta oprostitev utemeljena z naravo in logiko sistema omrežnin v Nemčiji.
The study postdates the BNetzA regulatory decision of 14 December 2011.
Poudarjajo, da sistem omrežnin v Nemčiji temelji na načelu upoštevanja vzroka za stroške, vendar imajo pasovni odjemalci vzorec porabe in obremenitve, ki je drugačen od tipičnih uporabnikov omrežja, katerih poraba in obremenitev sta spremenljivi in nepredvidljivi.
Hence, the MEOP is not applicable in the present case.
Pasovni odjemalci so prispevali k znižanju različnih stroškov omrežja, zato je bila popolna oprostitev utemeljena.
Hence, a market economy operator could not have relied on it when deciding the exemption.
Za določitev, ali je prednost selektivna, mora Komisija dokazati, da se pri ukrepu razlikuje med gospodarskimi subjekti, ki so glede na opredeljeni cilj referenčnega sistema v primerljivem dejanskem in pravnem položaju, ter da takega razlikovanja ni mogoče utemeljiti z naravo ali splošno shemo referenčnega sistema.
Even if the 2012 Study was relevant for the application of the MEOP, quod non, it does not support the claims made.
Da bi preverili, ali v zadevnem pravnem sistemu popolna oprostitev pomeni selektivno prednost za nekatera podjetja pred drugimi, ki so glede na cilj tega sistema v primerljivem dejanskem in pravnem položaju, je treba najprej opredeliti referenčni okvir, v katerega spada zadevni ukrep.
The interested parties claim that in order to secure the necessary minimum generation by such power plants, there is a need for a stable and large demand as this will ensure the profitability of the plant concerned and ensure that they are not mothballed.
Referenčni sistem
It must, however, be noted that the 2012 Study itself does not at all relate to the usefulness of baseload consumers for maintaining the required minimum generation from conventional power plants in Germany to ensure a secured network management.
Komisija se strinja, da je za namene tega sklepa zadevni referenčni okvir nemški sistem omrežnin.
It is not the object of the 2012 Study and baseload consumers are in fact not mentioned in it.
Ta sistem omrežnin temelji na načelu, da morajo omrežnine temeljiti na stroških in biti nediskriminatorne.
In other words, the minimum generation capacity needed in Germany to ensure a secured network management depends on the consumption volume but also type of load that needs to be satisfied.
Načelo upoštevanja vzroka za stroške je določeno v členu 16 StromNEV in implicitno v členu 3 StromNEV, ki določa, da omrežnine ustrezajo plačilu za uporabo omrežij.
If the demand had been smaller or if there was no need to ensure baseload generation in order to cover baseload consumption, the minimum generation capacity needed in Germany would have been different.
V uredbi StromNEV so določena podrobna pravila o metodologiji za določanje omrežnin, pri katerem se upoštevajo stroški.
Baseload consumers are part of the reason why this amount of generation capacity is needed in the first place.
Člen 24 EnWG 2011 pooblašča zvezno vlado, da z uredbo določi metodologijo za določanje splošnih omrežnin, ki se plačajo.
Their demand can therefore hardly be described as a service.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 7 tega sklepa, člen 24 EnWG s tega vidika razlikuje med splošnimi uporabniki in netipičnimi uporabniki omrežja, ki se jim lahko zaračuna individualna omrežnina.
In any event, the mere existence of baseload consumers would not be sufficient to ensure that the concerned power plants remain on the market.
Uredba StromNEV upošteva to razlikovanje in vsebuje tudi dve metodologiji: metodologijo, ki se uporablja za tipične uporabnike omrežja (členi 15, 16 in 17 StromNEV), in metodologijo, ki se uporablja za netipične uporabnike omrežja (glej uvodne izjave od 17 do 20 tega sklepa).
This will ultimately depend on the price at which the electricity is sold.
Členi 15, 16 in 17 StromNEV določajo splošno metodo izračuna za določanje omrežnin.
If this price is too low, it will not enable the baseload power plant to remain on the market.
Ta metodologija je opisana v uvodnih izjavah 10 in 14 tega sklepa.
It will also depend on the production level of renewable electricity.
Zlasti funkcija istočasnosti, opisana v členu 16(2) StromNEV in Prilogi 4 k StromNEV, omogoča dodelitev stroškov omrežja različnim uporabnikom omrežja glede na verjetnost, da poraba električne energije zadevnega posameznega uporabnika prispeva k letni konični vrednosti.
At times of low demand but high renewable electricity production, the renewable electricity has priority dispatch and priority access over power plants using fossil fuels.
Nemčija trdi, da je v sistemu, v katerem električna energija teče od zgoraj navzdol, letna konična vrednost eden od glavnih povzročiteljev stroškov omrežja.
Finally, it should be noted that part of the conventional power plants mentioned in the 2012 study on the minimum generation from conventional power plants are not baseload power plants but conventional power plants that can be ramped up rapidly like gas turbines.
Zlasti pasovni odjemalci niso povzročili stroškov, povezanih z izravnavo nenadnih sprememb povpraševanja, saj imajo predvidljivo in veliko stalnejšo porabo.
Baseload consumers will not constitute an incentive for this type of plants to remain on the market as their profitability is linked to the possibility to obtain higher electricity prices when the system is under stress.
Isto velja za ukrepe, ki jih je treba sprejeti za ohranjanje frekvence omrežja kljub spremembam obremenitve.
Some interested parties have also argued that the exemption is justified because baseload consumers are part of the five stage load shedding plan that has been put in place by TSOs to avoid blackouts when the system is overloaded.
Res je, da pasovni odjemalci prispevajo h konični obremenitvi tako kot vsi ostali porabniki omrežja in da je konična obremenitev pomembna pri določitvi obsega omrežja ter s tem za dejavnik, ki povzroča stroške omrežja.
This plan is described in the Transmission Code 2007 (Network and System Rules of the German Transmission System Operators).
Vendar ni pomembna za razporeditev drugih stroškov omrežja (npr. stroškov v zvezi z rezervami, potrebnimi za oskrbo z izravnalno energijo).
They also claim that this load shedding would occur outside any contractual relationship and without compensation and that the full exemption compensates them for their contribution to security of supply.
Če bi imeli vsi uporabniki omrežja nepredvidljive in spremenljive vzorce, bi bilo kljub temu razumno, da se ti stroški razporedijo po istem ključu, tj. glede na njihov prispevek h konični obremenitvi.
On this point, it is noted first that these claims are contradicted by the Transmission Code 2007 itself.
Vendar imajo pasovni odjemalci predvidljiv in veliko stabilnejši vzorec obremenitve.
Article 7.3.4(6) of the Transmission Code 2007 explicitly indicates that load shedding will be assured by contractual arrangements with the network customers.
V obdobju 2011–2013 so glede na mešanico virov energije pasovni odjemalci veliko manj potrebovali sistemske storitve kot ostali uporabniki omrežja.
In addition there is no correlation between the full exemption and the load shedding in the sense that the inclusion in the five stage load shedding plan is not a requirement to be eligible for the full exemption.
Zato v sistemu omrežnin, ki temelji na načelu upoštevanja vzroka za strošek, stroškov za sistemske storitve, ki za pasovne odjemalce niso potrebni, tem ni bilo mogoče dodeliti po istem ključu kot za uporabnike omrežja, ki imajo spremenljivo in nepredvidljivo obremenitev.
Interested parties admit on this point that their stable consumption only increases the likelihood to be included in the plan.
Poleg tega metodologija za izračun, ki temelji na funkciji istočasnosti, ne upošteva ekonomije obsega.
Also consumers who do not qualify as baseload consumers can be part of the plan.
Kadar se stalno izkorišča celotna zmogljivost omrežja, so stroški na enoto veliko nižji, kot če isto omrežje spremenljivi odjemalci samo občasno izkoriščajo v celoti, na splošno pa izkoriščajo samo do 30 % njegove zmogljivosti.
In fact, the five stage load shedding plan will have to include consumers other than baseload consumers.
Nazadnje, zaradi spremenljivosti in nepredvidljivosti porabe uporabnikov na splošno, morajo operaterji omrežja pri načrtovanju obsega omrežja upoštevati varnostno rezervo.
Indeed, it includes between 35 % to 50 % of the system load (after shedding of pumps).
Faktor istočasnosti namreč izraža samo verjetnost, da bo nek odjemalec energijo porabljal v času konične obremenitve, ne more pa tega zagotavljati.
Based on the information submitted by Germany the beneficiaries of the full exemption would in total reach a peak load of around 3,5 GW which represents around 4,2 % of peak demand in Germany in 2013.
Taka varnostna rezerva pa pri pasovnih odjemalcih ni potrebna v enakem obsegu, če sploh.
Hence, even assuming that the exemption could constitute remuneration for the inclusion in the five stage plan it would still constitute a selective advantage given that it would be limited to baseload consumers and excluded for all other consumers that are also part of the five stage load shedding plan.
Če bi bile torej omrežnine za pasovne odjemalce izračunane na podlagi metodologije omrežnin z uporabo funkcije istočasnosti, bi bile tudi v tem primeru precenjene.
Finally some interested parties seem to imply that baseload consumers would need to comply with specific technical specifications when connecting to the grid and that to meet those specifications baseload consumers would need to make investments in devices that improve the stability of the network because delivering reactive power but for which they are not compensated.
Komisija zato meni, da je možnost iz člena 24 EnWG 2011, da se določijo individualne omrežnine za netipične uporabnike, kot so pasovni odjemalci, v skladu z načelom upoštevanja vzroka za stroške in načelom nediskriminacije.
It is noted, however, that the full exemption cannot be seen as remuneration for this alleged service that a market economy operator would have paid.
Razumeti jo je treba kot sestavni del referenčnega sistema, saj se uporablja kot popravni ukrep, da se upoštevajo stroški omrežja, ki jih dejansko povzročijo netipični uporabniki omrežja, kot so pasovni odjemalci.
Indeed, the situation described by the interested parties does not correspond to a service that network operators would buy.
Komisija meni tudi, da je določba, v skladu s katero individualne omrežnine, ki jih plačajo netipični uporabniki omrežja, ne smejo biti nižje od 20 % objavljenih omrežnin, sestavni del pravil, ki veljajo za individualne omrežnine v skladu z uredbo StromNEV.
It corresponds to a technical specification that consumers need to meet in order to be connected to the network.
Prvič, ta minimalni prispevek je bil stalna zahteva, kar zadeva skupino netipičnih uporabnikov omrežja iz prvega stavka člena 19(2) StromNEV in se je zlasti uporabljal v obdobju 2011–2013 (glej uvodno izjavo 21 tega sklepa).
In particular, they need to ensure that their shift factor remains between – 0,9 and + 0,9.
Drugič, uporabljal se je tudi za pasovne odjemalce v skladu s StromNEV 2010 (glej uvodno izjavo 20 tega sklepa).
Depending on the circumstances, this might indeed require the consumer to invest into specific equipment that make sure that their shift factor remains between the prescribed values.
Nazadnje, minimalni 20-odstotni prispevek omrežnine za netipične uporabnike, kot so pasovni odjemalci, ustreza – kot je pojasnila Nemčija (glej uvodno izjavo 20) – varovalki, ki zagotavlja, da netipični odjemalci prispevajo vsaj minimalno k plačilu za korist, ki izhaja iz priključitve na omrežje.
This cannot be considered as a service to the grid but constitutes a preventive measure against bigger network disturbances.
Zlasti z vidika pasovnih odjemalcev se pri minimalnem 20-odstotnem prispevku upošteva tudi, da metodologija fizične poti, čeprav tesno izraža stroške omrežja, ki jih povzročijo pasovni odjemalci, kljub tem vključuje določen približek.
Interested parties themselves acknowledge that this specification is necessary to ensure safe network management.
Vendar Komisija meni, da je popolna oprostitev, uvedena z zakonom z dne 26. julija 2011, v nasprotju s sistemom individualnih omrežnin iz točke 3 prvega stavka člena 24 EnWG 2011, v skladu s katerim se lahko za netipične oblike uporabe omrežja uporabljajo individualne omrežnine.
In addition, technical specifications apply to any consumer requesting connection to the concerned network and not specifically to baseload consumers so even if the exemption could be seen as a ‘remuneration’ (which however is not the case), it would still constitute a selective advantage given that it would be limited to baseload consumers and excluded for all other consumers that are subject to the same requirement.
Načelo upoštevanja vzroka za stroške ter načelo, da morajo biti omrežnine sorazmerne in nediskriminatorne, pomenita, da se omrežnine določijo na podlagi individualni stroškov omrežja, ki se lahko pripišejo določenemu uporabniku omrežja.
EXISTENCE OF A SELECTIVE ADVANTAGE
Popolna oprostitev omrežnin bi bila torej v skladu s tema načeloma samo, če bi bilo dokazano, da pasovni odjemalci ne povzročajo nobenih stroškov omrežja.
Both the interested parties and Germany have argued that the full exemption did not constitute a selective advantage as that exemption was justified by the nature and logic of the network charge system in Germany.
To pa ni dokazano.
They underline that the network charge system in Germany is based on cost-causality but that baseload consumers have a consumption and load pattern that is very different from typical network users, which have a variable and unpredictable consumption and load.
Nasprotno, pasovni odjemalci povzročajo stroške omrežja, zlasti kadar so na novo priključeni na obstoječe omrežje, saj lahko njihova priključitev zahteva povečanje zmogljivosti takega omrežja.
Baseload consumers contributed to the reduction of various network costs which justified the full exemption.
Podobno, če omrežje še ni zgrajeno, je treba njegov obseg načrtovati tako, da se zadovolji vsaj povpraševanje pasovnih odjemalcev.
The full exemption can only amount to State aid to the extent that the advantage granted to baseload consumers is selective.
To so priznala tudi nemška deželna sodišča in zvezno sodišče.
In order to establish that an advantage is selective, the Commission has to demonstrate that a measure differentiates between economic operators who are, in light of the objective of the reference system identified, in a comparable factual and legal situation and that such a differentiation cannot be justified by the nature or the general scheme of the reference system.
Izrecno so ugotovila, da je bila popolna oprostitev v nasprotju s členom 24 EnWG 2011 (glej uvodni izjavi 52 in 52 tega sklepa).
In order to verify whether, under the relevant legal regime, the full exemption constitutes a selective advantage for certain undertakings over others which are, in the light of the objective pursued by that regime, in a comparable factual and legal situation, it is necessary to first define the reference framework within which the measure concerned fits.
Nadalje je treba ugotoviti, da so se za drugo kategorijo netipičnih uporabnikov omrežja iz prvega stavka člena 19(2) StromNEV v letih od 2011 do 2013 še naprej uporabljale individualne omrežnine, izračunane na podlagi individualnega profila obremenitve (glej uvodno izjavo 21 tega sklepa).
The reference system
Popolna oprostitev za pasovne odjemalce je torej uvedla diskriminacijo obeh ostalih skupin netipičnih uporabnikov omrežja, za katere so se še vedno uporabljale individualne omrežnine, ter vseh ostalih končnih uporabnikov, saj popolna oprostitev odstopa od načela upoštevanja vzroka za stroške in načela sorazmernosti omrežnin.
The Commission agrees that, for the purposes of the present decision, the relevant reference framework is the German network charge system.
Ugotovljeno je, da so se pred uvedbo popolne oprostitve z letom 2011 za pasovne odjemalce uporabljale individualne omrežnine, ki jih je bilo treba določiti, da se je upoštevalo znižanje stroškov omrežja ali zmanjšanje povišanja stroškov omrežja, ki so nastali zaradi pasovnih odjemalcev.
This network charge system is based on the principle that network charges must be cost-based and non-discriminatory.
Te individualne omrežnine pa niso smele biti nižje od 20 % objavljenih omrežnin.
Indeed, Paragraph 21 of the EnWG establishes the principle that network charges must be proportionate (‘angemessen’), non-discriminatory and transparent (see recital 7 of this Decision).
Agencija BNetzA je za izračun teh stroškov opredelila metodologijo fizične poti (glej uvodno izjavo 19).
The cost-causality principle is enshrined in Paragraph 16 of the StromNEV and implicit in Paragraph 3 of the StromNEV which states that network charges correspond to the payment for the use of the networks.
Komisija meni, da je to zanesljiva metodologija za okvirno določitev stroškov, ki so jih pasovni odjemalci povzročili v obdobju 2011–2013, glede na značilnosti elektroenergetskega sistema v tistem času.
The StromNEV sets out detailed rules on the methodology for a cost-reflective determination of network charges.
Pri tej metodologije se namreč omrežnine določijo na podlagi stroškov, ki se lahko pripišejo pasovnim odjemalcem, tj. stroškov kapitala in fiksnih stroškov poslovanja v zvezi z delom omrežja, ki pasovnega odjemalca povezuje z najbližjo bazno elektrarno, ki lahko dejansko krije njegovo celotno povpraševanje.
Paragraph 24 of the EnWG 2011 empowers the federal government to specify by ordinance the methodology for determining the general network charges to be paid.
Čeprav je res, da ta metoda – kot je očitala ena od zainteresiranih strani – vodi do diferenciranih omrežnin glede na lokacijo pasovnega odjemalca v omrežju, je to ravno namen individualnih omrežnin, in sicer da se preverijo stroški, ki jih omrežju povzroči vsak posamezen pasovni odjemalec.
As set out in recital 7 of this Decision, Paragraph 24 of the EnWG makes a distinction in this respect between the generality of users and atypical network users which can be charged an individual network charge.
Če je pasovni odjemalec bolj oddaljen od bazne elektrarne, to pomeni tudi, da uporablja veliko večji del omrežja za prenos električne energije od elektrarne, ki lahko dejansko krije njegovo povpraševanje.
The StromNEV implements this distinction and also contains two sets of methodologies: the methodology applicable to typical network users (Paragraphs 15, 16 and 17 of the StromNEV) and the methodology applicable to atypical network users (see recitals 17 to 20 of this Decision).
Tudi to, da se fizična pot izračuna glede na elektrarno, ki krije celotno povpraševanja pasovnega odjemalca, je utemeljeno.
Paragraphs 15, 16 and 17 of the StromNEV provide for the general calculation method to determine the network charges.
Če bi elektrarna krila samo del povpraševanja pasovnega odjemalca, bi to pomenilo, da uporablja več delov omrežja za kritje svojega povpraševanja in je zato tudi odgovoren za višje stroške omrežja.
This methodology has been described in recitals 10 and 14 of this Decision.
Kar zadeva dejstvo, da se pri metodologiji fizične poti hidroelektrarne ne priznavajo kot bazne elektrarne, je bilo ugotovljeno, da smernice BNetzA iz leta 2010, navedene v uvodni izjavi 19 zgoraj, priznavajo hidroelektrarne kot bazne elektrarne.