natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, the Commission forwarded to Bafang the specific questionnaire for producers of input materials.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je prejela tudi od petih vzorčenih skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov, kitajskega dobavitelja vhodnega materiala iz uvodne izjave 50 ter vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in vzorčenih nepovezanih uvoznikov.
Questionnaires were also sent to the five sampled exporting producers' groups, to the sampled Union producers and unrelated importers.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev subvencije, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
The Commission received questionnaire replies from the GOC.
V prostorih kitajskega ministrstva za trgovino je bil opravljen preveritveni obisk, pri katerem so sodelovali tudi uradniki z drugih ustreznih ministrstev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: preveritveni obisk pri kitajski vladi).
Those comprised replies to the specific questionnaire from EXIM Bank, ABC, BOC, ICBC and Sinosure.
Tega preveritvenega obiska so se udeležili tudi predstavniki naslednjih finančnih institucij:
The Commission also received questionnaire replies from the five sampled exporting producers' groups, from the Chinese input supplier mentioned in recital (50), and from the sampled Union producers and from the sampled unrelated importers.
Kitajska izvozno-uvozna banka, Peking, Kitajska,
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the determination of subsidy, resulting injury and Union interest.
Industrijska in poslovna banka Kitajske, Peking, Kitajska,
A verification visit took place at the premises the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, during which officials from other relevant ministries also participated (‘verification visit at the GOC’).
Kitajska kmetijska banka, Peking, Kitajska,
Moreover, representatives from the following financial institutions were present during this verification visit:
Banka Kitajske, Peking, Kitajska,
Export Import Bank of China, Beijing, China,
China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation, Peking, Kitajska.
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Beijing, China,
Poleg tega so bili preveritveni obiski na podlagi člena 26 osnovne uredbe opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Agricultural Bank of China, Beijing, China,
vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije.
Bank of China, Beijing, China,
skupina Accell Group (Heerenveen, Nizozemska),
China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation, Beijing, China.
Eurosport DHS SA (Deva, Romunija) in njegova povezana družba Prophete GmbH & Co. KG (Rheda-Wiedenbrück, Nemčija),
Furthermore, verification visits pursuant to Article 26 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Derby Cycle Holding GmbH (Cloppenburg, Nemčija),
Sampled Union producers
Koninklijke Gazelle NV (Dieren, Nizozemska);
Accell Group (Heerenveen, the Netherlands),
vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK:
Eurosport DHS SA (Deva, Romania), and their related company Prophete GmbH & Co. KG (Rheda-Wiedenbrück, Germany),
Yadea Technology Co., Ltd., Wuxi, Kitajska,
Derby Cycle Holding GmbH (Cloppenburg, Germany),
Tianjin Yadea Industry Co., Ltd., Tianjin, Kitajska,
Koninklijke Gazelle NV (Dieren, The Netherlands);
Wuxi Yadea Import and Export Co., Ltd., Wuxi, Kitajska,
Sampled exporting producers in the PRC
Wuxi Xingwei Vehicle Fittings Co., Ltd., Wuxi, Kitajska,
Yadea Technology Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China,
Jiangsu Yadea Technology Development Co., Ltd., Wuxi, Kitajska;
Tianjin Yadea Industry Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China,
Giant (China) Co., Ltd., Kunshan, Kitajska,
Wuxi Yadea Import and Export Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China,
Giant Electric Vehicle (Kunshan) Co. Ltd., Kunshan, Kitajska,
Wuxi Xingwei Vehicle Fittings Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China,
Giant (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Tianjin, Kitajska,
Jiangsu Yadea Technology Development Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China;
Giant (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Kunshan, Kitajska,
Giant (China) Co., Ltd., Kunshan, China,
Kunshan Giant Light Metal Co., Ltd., Kunshan, Kitajska;
Giant Electric Vehicle (Kunshan) Co. Ltd., Kunshan, China,
Jinhua Vision Industry Co., Ltd, Jinhua, Kitajska,
Giant (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.,Tianjin, China,
Yongkang Hulong Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd., Yongkang, Kitajska,
Giant (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Kunshan, China,
Kunshan Youheng Machinery co., Ltd., Kunshan, Kitajska;
Kunshan Giant Light Metal Co., Ltd., Kunshan, China;
Suzhou Rununion Motivity Co., Ltd., Suzhou, Kitajska,
Jinhua Vision Industry Co., Ltd, Jinhua, China,
Suzhou Kaihua Electric Appliance Plastic Factory, Suzhou, Kitajska;
Yongkang Hulong Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd., Yongkang, China,
Bodo Vehicle Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin, Kitajska,
Kunshan Youheng Machinery co., Ltd., Kunshan, China;
Tianjin Xinbao Vehicle Co., Ltd., Tianjin, Kitajska;
Suzhou Rununion Motivity Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China,
dobavitelj kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom:
Suzhou Kaihua Electric Appliance Plastic Factory, Suzhou, China;
Bafang (Suzhou) Electric Motor Co., Ltd., Suzhou, Kitajska;
Bodo Vehicle Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China,
vzorčeni nepovezani uvozniki v Uniji:
Tianjin Xinbao Vehicle Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China;
(Vitoria, Španija),
Supplier to the Chinese exporting producers
Bizbike Bvba (Wielsbeke, Belgija),
Bafang (Suzhou) Electric Motor Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China;
(Amsterdam, Nizozemska),
Sampled unrelated importers in the Union:
(La Flèche, Francija),
(Vitoria, Spain),
(Nunspeet, Nizozemska).
Bizbike Bvba (Wielsbeke, Belgium),
Komisija je vse navedene družbe ustrezno obvestila o rezultatih preveritvenih obiskov.
(Amsterdam, the Netherlands),
Neuvedba začasnih ukrepov
(La Fleche, France),
Glede na zapletenost preiskave in število zainteresiranih strani se je Komisija odločila, da v sedanji preiskavi ne bo uvedla začasnih ukrepov.
(Nunspeet, the Netherlands).
Vse zainteresirane strani je 24. septembra 2018 obvestila, da se na uvoz električnih koles s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo ne bodo uvedle začasne izravnalne dajatve in da se bo preiskava nadaljevala.
The Commission properly informed all the companies above of the results of the verification visits.
Komisija je nadaljevala zbiranje in preverjanje vseh informacij, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za oblikovanje dokončnih ugotovitev.
Non-imposition of provisional measures
31. oktobra 2018 je vsem zainteresiranim stranem razkrila bistvena dejstva in premisleke, na podlagi katerih je nameravala uvesti dokončno protisubvencijsko dajatev na uvoz električnih koles v Unijo, ter jih pozvala, naj ji v 25 dneh predložijo pripombe.
Given the complexity of the investigation and the number of interested parties the Commission decided not to impose provisional measures in the present case.
S takimi razkritji je zainteresirane strani še obvestila o rezultatih svojih preveritvenih obiskov, vključno s primeri, ko je morala uporabiti razpoložljiva dejstva.
On 24 September 2018, the Commission informed all interested parties that no provisional countervailing duties would be imposed on imports into the Union of electric bicycles originating in the PRC and that the investigation would continue.
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
The Commission continued seeking and verifying all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Zadevni izdelek
On 31 October 2018, the Commission disclosed to all interested parties the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-subsidy duty on imports of electric bicycles into the Union, and invited all parties to comment within 25 days.
Zadevni izdelek so kolesa, s pedali, s pomožnim električnim motorjem, s poreklom iz LRK, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN 87116010 in ex87116090 (oznaka TARIC 8711609010) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek ali električna kolesa ali e-kolesa).
Through such disclosures, the Commission further informed interested parties of the results of its verification visits, including the instances where the Commission had to use facts available.
Ta opredelitev zajema različne vrste električnih koles.
Product concerned
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo naslednji izdelki enake osnovne fizikalne lastnosti in enake osnovne končne uporabe:
The product concerned is cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN codes 87116010 and ex87116090 (TARIC code 8711609010) (‘the product concerned’ or ‘electric bicycles’ or ‘e-bikes’).
zadevni izdelek,
This definition covers various types of electric bicycles.
domači trg Kitajske,
The investigation showed that the following products have the same basic physical characteristics as well as the same basic end uses:
Navedeni izdelki se zato štejejo za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 2(c) osnovne uredbe.
domestic market China;
Kitajska vlada in zbornica CCCME sta v pripombah, ki sta jih predložili po začetku preiskave, nasprotovali nameri Komisije, da vse vrste električnih koles obravnava kot en sam izdelek.
the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry.
Zlasti sta trdili, da bi bilo treba iz obsega preiskave izključiti hitra električna kolesa (električna kolesa s hitrostjo več kot 25 km/h in manj kot 45 km/h).
Those products are therefore considered like products within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation.
Trdili sta, da ima motor običajnih električnih koles največjo moč 250 W, motor hitrih električnih koles pa ima lahko večjo moč, običajno od 350 do 500 W.
Claims regarding product scope
Ti zainteresirani strani sta trdili, da imajo hitra električna kolesa bistveno drugačne lastnosti in predvidene uporabe ter tudi bistveno drugačne cene.
In their comments following the initiation of the investigation, the GOC and the CCCME contested the Commission's intention to consider all electric bicycles as one single product.
Z vidika potrošnika hitra električna kolesa niso zamenljiva z nobenimi drugimi električnimi kolesi, zajetimi v to preiskavo.
In particular, they argued that speed electric bicycles (electric bicycles with a speed of more than 25 km/h and up to 45 km/h) should be excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Po mnenju kitajske vlade in zbornice CCCME se hitra električna kolesa od drugih električnih koles razlikujejo iz več razlogov.
They claimed that while the engine of standard electric bicycles has a maximum power of 250 W, the engine of speed electric bicycles can have a higher power of typically 350 – 500 W.
Prvič, niso iz enakih surovin in sestavnih delov.
These interested parties argued that speed electrical bicycles have significantly different characteristics and intended uses, and also significantly different prices.
Motor za hitra električna kolesa ima na primer večjo nazivno moč, materiali za električna kolesa pa so trdnejši in bolj kakovostni.
From the consumers' perspective, speed electric bicycles are not interchangeable with all the other electric bicycles covered by this investigation.
Drugič, stroški in cene so bistveno drugačni.
According to the GOC and the CCCME, there are several reasons for which speed electric bicycles are different from other electric bicycles.
Za kakovost in moč delov, ki se uporabljajo pri proizvodnji hitrih električnih koles, veljajo strožje zahteve, zato je strošek proizvodnje hitrih električnih koles višji od stroška proizvodnje običajnih električnih koles, tako pa je višja tudi končna prodajna cena.
First, the raw materials and components are different.
Tretjič, imajo drugačne oznake KN.
For instance, the engine for speed electric bicycles has a higher power rating and the materials for electric bicycles higher strength and quality.
Od 1. januarja 2017 so običajna električna kolesa uvrščena pod oznako KN 87116010, hitra električna kolesa pa pod oznako KN 87116090.
Second, the costs and prices would be significantly different.
Pred letom 2017 so bila običajna električna kolesa uvrščena pod oznako (ex) KN 87119010, hitra električna kolesa pa pod oznako (ex) KN 87119090.
Since there are stricter requirements for the quality and strength of the parts used to produce speed electric bicycles, the cost of producing speed electric bicycles is higher than that of ordinary electric bicycles, which in turn causes a final higher sales price.
Četrtič, hitra električna kolesa se štejejo za motorna vozila (kategorija vozil L1e-B), zato morajo imeti vozniki dovoljenje in nositi čelado.
Third, the CN codes are different.
Za običajna električna kolesa takšnih zahtev ni.
Since 1 January 2017, ordinary electric bicycles have been classified under CN code 87116010 and speed electric bicycles under CN code 87116090.
Te zahteve bodo močno omejile, kdo lahko kupi hitra električna kolesa in jih upravlja.
Before 2017, ordinary electric bicycles were classified under (ex) CN code 87119010 and speed electric bicycles under (ex) CN code 87119090.
Petič, hitrih električnih koles ne kupujejo iste vrste potrošnikov.
Fourth, speed electric bicycles are regarded as motor vehicles (vehicle category L1e-B), so drivers are required to have a licence and to wear helmets.
Kupci običajnih električnih koles so navadno pisarniški delavci ali starejše osebe zaradi dodatnega pomožnega pogona, kupci hitrih električnih koles pa so večinoma mladi, ki ta električna kolesa uporabljajo za zahtevnejše ali športne dejavnosti.
There are no such requirements for ordinary electric bicycles.
Pritožnik je trdil, da imajo vsa električna kolesa ključne skupne lastnosti.
These requirements will substantially constrain who can purchase and operate the speed electric bicycles.
Zlasti je trdil, da gre v obeh primerih za kolesa, zasnovana tako, da se poganjajo s pedali, in opremljena s pomožnim električnim motorjem za pomoč pri poganjanju s pedali.
Fifth, the types of consumers for the speed electric bicycles are different.
Poleg tega se za vsa električna kolesa izvajajo isti preskusni postopki po evropskem standardu EN 15194.
Normally, purchasers of ordinary electric bicycles are mainly office workers or elderly persons who appreciate the additional power assist, while purchasers of speed electric bicycles are mostly young people using these electric bicycles for more strenuous or sporting activities.
Pritožnik je na podlagi tega sklenil, da za namene teh preiskav pomenijo en sam izdelek.
The complainant argued that all electric bicycles share key common characteristics.
Pritožnik je to poudaril tudi zato, ker se lahko končna hitrost pomožnega motornega pogona s 25 km/h zlahka poveča na 45 km/h in obratno, saj je to zlasti vprašanje programiranja programske opreme in ne dejanskih fizikalnih razlik.
In particular, both are cycles designed to pedal, equipped with an auxiliary electric motor for pedal assistance.
Med preiskavo je en uvoznik trdil, da bi bilo treba električna kolesa, ki spadajo v kategorijo L1e-A, izključiti iz obsega izdelka v preiskavi.
Moreover, all electric bicycles are subject to the same test procedures under the European Standard EN 15194.
Kategorija L1e-A zajema električna kolesa s pomožnim motornim pogonom do 25 km/h in močjo motorja do 1 kW.
On this basis, the complainant concluded that they form one single product for the purpose of the present investigations.
Po njegovih trditvah se električna kolesa kategorije L1e-A ne proizvajajo v Uniji in niso posebej navedena v pritožbi.
The complainant also pointed out that due to the fact that the auxiliary motor assistance cut-off speed could be easily changed from 25 km/h to 45km/h and vice-versa, as this is primarily a question of software programming and not actual physical differences.
Uvoznik je nadalje trdil, da električna kolesa kategorije L1e-A niso mogla povzročiti škode industriji Unije, saj je bilo prvo električno kolo kategorije L1e-A na trgu Unije prodano več kot osem tednov po tem, ko je pritožnik vložil pritožbo.
During the investigation, an importer claimed that electric bicycles falling under the L1e-A category should be excluded from the product scope of the investigation.
Komisija je vse te pripombe upoštevala.
The L1e-A category covers electric bicycles with an auxiliary motor support of up to 25 km/h, but with an engine power of up to 1 kW.
Opozorila je, da obseg izdelka v pritožbi dejansko zajema vsa kolesa s pedali, s pomožnim električnim motorjem.
Allegedly, L1e-A category electric bicycles are not produced in the Union, and not specifically mentioned in the complaint.
Obseg izdelka v pritožbi ne vsebuje nobenih omejitev glede klasifikacije vozila.
The importer further claimed that L1e-A category electric bicycles cannot have caused injury to the Union industry, since the first L1e-A category electric bicycle was sold on the Union market more than eight weeks after the complainant lodged the complaint.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da so električna kolesa kategorije L1e-A zajeta v pritožbi.
The Commission took all these comments into account.
Poleg tega je bilo s spletišča uvoznika iz uvodne izjave 73 razvidno, da imajo električna kolesa kategorije L1e-A vse prednosti običajnega električnega kolesa, vendar več moči.
It noted that the product scope of the complaint indeed covered all cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor.
Kar zadeva hitra električna kolesa, je predložena trditev, da so stroški njihove proizvodnje in prodajna cena precej višji.
The product scope of the complaint contains no limitation on the vehicle classification.
To samo po sebi ni razlog za izključitev izdelka iz obsega izdelka, saj obseg izdelka navadno vključuje blago, ki se prodaja po različnih cenah.
The Commission therefore concluded that L1e-A category electric bicycles are covered by the complaint.
Vendar se ta dejavnik upošteva pri primerjavah cen in izračunu dampinga in stopnje škode.
It was also clear from the website of the importer mentioned in recital (73) that L1e-A electric bicycles have all the benefits of a regular electric bicycle but with more power.
Kar zadeva različne predvidene uporabe in dojemanje potrošnikov, se trdi, da se običajna električna kolesa prodajajo pretežno starejšim ljudem, rekreativnim kolesarjem in tudi pisarniškim delavcem, hitra električna kolesa pa se večinoma uporabljajo za zahtevnejše dejavnosti, kot je dnevna migracija.
With regard to speed electric bicycles, it is claimed that they have a significantly higher cost of production and sales price.
Ker pa pisarniški delavci običajno električno kolo verjetno uporabljajo za vožnjo od doma do delovnega mesta, je ta uporaba zelo podobna uporabi hitrih električnih koles za dnevno migracijo.
This, as such, is not a reason for excluding a product from the product scope, since the product scope commonly includes goods sold at different prices.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da se predvidena uporaba in dojemanje potrošnikov precej prekrivata ter zato ne upravičujeta izključitve izdelka.
This factor is however taken into account in the price comparisons and calculation of the injury margin.
Kar zadeva obe trditvi glede izključitve, je Komisija sklenila, da imajo hitra električna kolesa in kolesa kategorije L1e-A enake fizikalne lastnosti kot druga električna kolesa in zato spadajo v obseg izdelka.
As regards the different uses and consumer perception, it is argued that normal electric bicycles are predominantly sold to elderly people, recreational cyclists, and also office workers, while speed electric bicycles are mostly used for more strenuous activities such as commuting.
Komisija je priznala, da splošna kategorija zadevnega izdelka zajema različne vrste izdelka, vendar to samo po sebi ne more voditi v izključitev iz obsega izdelka.
However, since office workers are likely to use their normal electric bicycle for driving from their home to the work place, this use is very similar to the use of commuting for speed electric bicycles.
Različna carinska razvrstitev v okviru iste splošne kategorije zadevnega izdelka prav tako ni merilo, ki bi samo po sebi vodilo v izključitev.
The Commission therefore concluded that the intended use and consumer perception overlap to a significant extent, and therefore do not warrant a product exclusion.
V protidampinških in protisubvencijskih preiskavah je pravzaprav zelo običajno, da zadevni izdelek vključuje niz carinskih oznak.
With regard to both claims for exclusion, the Commission concluded that speed electric bicycles and the L1e-A category bicycles share the same physical characteristics with other electric bicycles and thus fall within the product scope.
Nazadnje, zahteve glede uporabe zadevnega izdelka ali podobnega izdelka po prodaji ne vplivajo na osnovne fizikalne lastnosti, ki opredeljujejo navedeni izdelek za namene protisubvencijskih preiskav.
While the Commission acknowledged that there are different product types within the general category of the product concerned, this cannot per se lead to exclusion from the product scope.
Podobno obsega izdelka ne opredeljujejo kategorije potrošnikov, ki se bodo odločili za eno ali drugo vrsto izdelka.
Different customs classification within the same general category of the product concerned is also not a criterion which per se would lead to exclusion.
En uvoznik je trdil, da bi bilo treba električne trikolesnike izključiti iz obsega izdelka v preiskavi.
It is indeed very common in anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations that the product concerned encompasses a range of customs codes.
Trdil je, da ni jasno, ali preiskava dejansko zajema vse vrste koles (vključno z dvo-, tri- in štirikolesniki) ali le dvokolesa, ker je v naslovu obvestila o začetku navedeno, da se protisubvencijski postopek nanaša na uvoz električnih koles.
Finally, requirements relating to the after sale use of the product concerned or the like product do not affect the basic physical characteristics that define that product for the purpose of anti-subsidy investigations.
Komisija je opozorila, da obseg izdelka v preiskavi ni opredeljen z naslovom obvestila o začetku, ampak z njegovim oddelkom „2.
In the same vein, the product scope is not defined by categories of consumers that will be opting for one product type or the other.
Izdelek v preiskavi“.
One importer claimed that electrical tricycles should be removed from the product scope of the investigation.
V tem oddelku je jasno opredeljeno, da izdelek v preiskavi zajema „kolesa“.
It alleged that it is not clear whether the investigation actually covered all types of cycles (including bicycles, tricycles and quadricycles) or only bicycles, because the title of the Notice of initiation stated that the anti-subsidy proceeding concerns import of electric bicycles.
Izraz „kolesa“ ni omejen na kolesa z dvema kolesoma, ampak vključuje tudi trikolesnike in štirikolesnike.
The Commission noted that the product scope of the investigation is, however, not defined by the title of the Notice of initiation, but by section of the Notice ‘2.
Ker so dvokolesna kolesa daleč najobičajnejša vrsta koles, se je naslov nanašal na dvokolesna kolesa, pri čemer iz obsega preiskave niso bile izključene druge vrste koles.
Product under investigation’.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
This section clearly defines that the product under investigation covers ‘cycles’.
Uvoznik je nadalje trdil, da je bila preiskava posebej osredotočena na dvokolesa.
The term ‘cycles’ is not limited to bicycles with 2 wheels, but also includes tricycles and quadricycles.
Komisija se s to trditvijo ni strinjala.
Since bicycles are by far the most common type of cycle, the title referred to bicycles, without excluding other types of cycles from the scope of the investigation.
Zbrala je informacije o vseh vrstah električnih koles.
Therefore, this claim was rejected.
Proizvajalci Unije in proizvajalci izvozniki so morali navesti število koles za vse izdelke, ki so jih proizvedli in prodali na trgu Unije.
The importer further claimed that the investigation specifically focused on bicycles.
Zato je jasno, da so bili trikolesniki v preiskavi ločeno opredeljeni in preiskani.
The Commission disagreed with this claim.
Dvokolesa so nedvomno najobičajnejša vrsta koles, zato ni presenetljivo, da se izraz e-kolesa/električna kolesa v preiskavi in tudi na trgu na splošno uporablja za vse vrste električnih koles.
It had collected information covering all types of electric cycles.
To ne pomeni, da se med preiskavo niso upoštevale druge vrste koles.