natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The applicant shall also provide an updated assessment of the information submitted and, where relevant, further information to confirm the absence of thyroid endocrine activity in accordance with Points 3.6.5 and 3.8.2 of Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/605, by 1 February 2021.
učinka postopkov čiščenja vode na naravo ostankov, prisotnih v površinski in podzemni vodi, kadar se površinska ali podzemna voda odvzema za pitno vodo, v dveh letih po sprejetju smernic za oceno učinka postopka čiščenja vode na naravo ostankov, prisotnih v površinski in podzemni vodi.
Further details on identity and specification of active substance are provided in the review report.
Vlagatelj zagotovi tudi posodobljeno oceno predloženih informacij in po potrebi dodatne informacije za potrditev odsotnosti motnje endokrinega delovanja ščitnice v skladu s točkama 3.6.5 in 3.8.2 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1107/2009, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (EU) 2018/605, do 1. februarja 2021.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/605 of 19 April 2018 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 by setting out scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties (OJ L 101, 20.4.2018, p. 33).
Več podrobnosti o aktivni snovi in njenih lastnostih je v poročilu o pregledu.
ANNEX II
Uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/605 z dne 19. aprila 2018 o spremembi Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1107/2009 z določitvijo znanstvenih meril za ugotavljanje lastnosti endokrinih motilcev (UL L 101, 20.4.2018, str. 33).
in Part A, entry 96 on methoxyfenozide is deleted;
Priloga k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 se spremeni:
in Part E, the following entry is added:
v delu A se vnos 96 za metoksifenozid črta;
Tert-butylhydrazine < 0,001 g/kg
v delu E se doda naslednji vnos:
For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on methoxyfenozide, and in particular Appendices I and II thereto, shall be taken into account.
terc-butil hidrazin < 0,001 g/kg
a comparative in vitro metabolism study on methoxyfenozide, by 1 April 2020;
Za izvajanje enotnih načel iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 se upoštevajo ugotovitve iz poročila o pregledu metoksifenozida ter zlasti dodatka I in II k poročilu.
The applicant shall also provide an updated assessment of the information submitted and, where relevant, further information to confirm the absence of thyroid endocrine activity in accordance with Points 3.6.5 and 3.8.2 of Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/605 by 1 February 2021.
primerjalne študije o presnovi metoksifenozida in vitro do 1. aprila 2020;
Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/605 of 19 April 2018 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 by setting out scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties.
Vlagatelj zagotovi tudi posodobljeno oceno predloženih informacij in po potrebi dodatne informacije za potrditev odsotnosti motnje endokrinega delovanja ščitnice v skladu s točkama 3.6.5 in 3.8.2 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1107/2009, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (EU) 2018/605, do 1. februarja 2021.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/159
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2019/159
imposing definitive safeguard measures against imports of certain steel products
o uvedbi dokončnih zaščitnih ukrepov proti uvozu nekaterih izdelkov iz jekla
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/478 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on common rules for imports, and in particular Article 16 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2015/478 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2015 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz in zlasti člena 16 Uredbe,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/755 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on common rules for imports, and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2015/755 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2015 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz iz nekaterih tretjih držav in zlasti člena 13 Uredbe,
On 18 July 2018, Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2018/1013 imposed provisional safeguard measures with regard to imports of certain steel products (‘the provisional Regulation’).
Z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2018/1013 so 18. julija 2018 uvedeni začasni zaščitni ukrepi v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih izdelkov iz jekla (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasna uredba).
The investigation was initiated ex officio on 26 March 2018 (‘Notice of Initiation’) into 26 different steel product categories, pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2015/755 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Preiskava 26 različnih kategorij izdelkov iz jekla se je začela 26. marca 2018 po uradni dolžnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku) v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (EU) 2015/478 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter členom 3 Uredbe (EU) 2015/755 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
On 28 June 2018, the Commission extended the product scope of the safeguard investigation to two additional categories (‘Extension Notice’).
Komisija je 28. junija 2018 razširila obseg zaščitne preiskave v zvezi jeklenimi izdelki na dve dodatni kategoriji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o razširitvi).
As mentioned in recital (20) of the provisional Regulation, the investigation covered the period from 2013 to 2017 (‘the period considered’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 20 začasne uredbe, je preiskava zajela obdobje od leta 2013 do leta 2017 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
Due process
Dolžno pravno postopanje
The Commission received 452 questionnaire replies from interested parties in the framework of this investigation.
Komisija je v okviru te preiskave prejela 452 izpolnjenih vprašalnikov zainteresiranih strani.
The Commission has also received an extensive number of written comments on the findings contained in the provisional Regulation from Union producers, exporting producers, importers, users, associations and third countries' authorities.
Komisija je prejela tudi veliko pisnih pripomb o ugotovitvah iz začasne uredbe, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci Unije, proizvajalci izvozniki, uvozniki, uporabniki, združenja in organi tretjih držav.
Following the adoption of provisional measures, the Commission undertook to verify more in depth the information (including the most recent data) supplied by the Union producers for the purpose of the final determination.
Po sprejetju začasnih ukrepov se je Komisija zavezala, da bo podrobneje preverila informacije (vključno z najnovejšimi podatki), ki so jih za namene končne določitve predložili proizvajalci Unije.
Given the sheer number of EU cooperating producers, it was materially impossible to undergo verification visits at the premises of every single Union producer.
Zaradi samega števila sodelujočih proizvajalcev v EU ni bilo mogoče opraviti preveritvenih obiskov v prostorih vsakega posameznega proizvajalca Unije.
Consequently, the Commission opted for checking the quality and reliability of the data by verifying those of a selected number of producers that were chosen to cover a sufficiently large production volume and the widest possible range of the product categories under investigation.
Komisija se je zato odločila, da preveri kakovost in zanesljivost podatkov, in sicer za določene proizvajalce, ki so bili izbrani tako, da predstavljajo dovolj velik obseg proizvodnje in čim širši nabor kategorij izdelka v preiskavi.
On this basis, the Commission verified the questionnaire replies at the premises of ten Union producers that accounted for over 15 % of the overall sales in the Union in 2017 of the product under investigation.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija preverila izpolnjene vprašalnike v prostorih desetih proizvajalcev Unije, ki so v letu 2017 predstavljali več kot 15 % celotne prodaje izdelka v preiskavi v Uniji.
From June to September 2018, verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following Union producers:
Od junija do septembra 2018 so bili preveritveni obiski opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih proizvajalcev Unije:
Compañía Española de Laminación, S.L (CELSA), Spain;
Compañía Española de Laminación, S.L (CELSA), Španija,
Mannesmann Precision Tubes GmbH, (Salzgitter Group), Germany;
Mannesmann Precision Tubes GmbH, (Salzgitter Group), Nemčija,
Mannesmann Stainless Tubes GmbH, (Salzgitter Group), Germany;
Mannesmann Stainless Tubes GmbH, (Salzgitter Group), Nemčija,
Riva Stahl GmbH, Germany;
Riva Stahl GmbH, Nemčija,
U. S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., Slovakia; and
U. S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., Slovaška in
Ugitech SA, France.
Ugitech SA, Francija.
In order to obtain the most recent information for its final determination, on 7 September 2018 the Commission requested the associations of Union producers to submit an updated set of data on the product categories under investigation.
Da bi Komisija pridobila najnovejše informacije za svojo končno določitev, je 7. septembra 2018 združenja proizvajalcev Unije zaprosila za predložitev posodobljenega sklopa podatkov o kategorijah izdelkov v preiskavi.
Pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 and Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2015/755 all interested parties who requested a hearing within the limit set were granted such hearing.
V skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (EU) 2015/478 in členom 3 Uredbe (EU) 2015/755 se je vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so zahtevale zaslišanje v okviru določenega roka, tako zaslišanje odobrilo.
On 12, 13 and 14 September and 1 October 2018, the Commission organised 93 individual hearing sessions, during which 150 interested parties expressed their views.
Komisija je 12., 13. in 14. septembra ter 1. oktobra 2018 organizirala 93 posameznih zaslišanj, na katerih je 150 zainteresiranih strani izrazilo svoja stališča.
Comments submitted within the deadlines by interested parties, in writing or orally during the hearing sessions, were duly considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Pripombe, ki so jih zainteresirane stranke predložile v pisni ali ustni obliki med zaslišanji, so bile po potrebi ustrezno obravnavane in upoštevane.
The product concerned is certain steel products belonging to the 28 steel product categories defined in the above-mentioned Notice of Initiation, as amended by the Extension Notice, taken all together.
Zadevni izdelek so nekateri izdelki iz jekla, ki spadajo v 28 kategorij izdelkov iz jekla, opredeljenih v zgoraj navedenem obvestilu o začetku, kakor je bilo spremenjeno z obvestilom o razširitvi, in sicer obravnavani vsi skupaj.
These product categories are subject to the US tariff measures under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (‘US Section 232 measures’).
Za te kategorije izdelkov veljajo tarifni ukrepi ZDA iz oddelka 232 zakona o širitvi trgovine iz leta 1962 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrepi iz oddelka 232 zakona ZDA).
A single group definition
Opredelitev ene same skupine
The Commission defined the product scope of the safeguard investigation in recitals (11) to (17) of the provisional Regulation, where it presented a detailed reasoning in support of the global analysis in the light of the strong interrelations between all product categories subject to the investigation.
Komisija je obseg izdelka iz zaščitne preiskave opredelila v uvodnih izjavah 11 do 17 začasne uredbe, kjer je predstavila podrobno obrazložitev v podporo globalni analizi glede na tesne medsebojne povezave med vsemi kategorijami izdelkov, ki so predmet preiskave.
After the publication of the provisional Regulation, several interested parties claimed that there is not one single product concerned but several products concerned.
Po objavi začasne uredbe je več zainteresiranih strani trdilo, da ne obstaja en sam zadevni izdelek, ampak več zadevnih izdelkov.
These parties observed that the Notice of Initiation does not refer to a single product concerned but uses in some passages the plural and refers to ‘products concerned’.
Te strani so pripomnile, da se obvestilo o začetku ne nanaša na en sam zadevni izdelek, ampak v nekaterih delih uporablja množino in se nanaša na „zadevne izdelke“.
The same parties claimed that the approach followed by the Commission in the current investigation is contrary to the ruling of the Appellate Body (‘AB’) in US – Steel Safeguards.
Iste strani so trdile, da je pristop, ki ga je Komisija uporabila v sedanji preiskavi, v nasprotju s sodbo pritožbenega organa v ZDA – Zaščitni ukrepi na področju jekla.
In this case, the AB ruled that applying a global approach to the calculation of ‘unforeseen developments’ could lead to the application of ‘safeguard measures to a broad category of products even if imports of one or more of those products did not increase and did not result from the “unforeseen developments”’ and would not meet the requirement of Article XIX of the GATT.
V tem primeru je pritožbeni organ odločil, da bi uporaba globalnega pristopa pri izračunu „nepredvidenega razvoja dogodkov“ lahko privedla do uporabe „zaščitnih ukrepov za široko kategorijo izdelkov, čeprav se uvoz enega ali več navedenih izdelkov ni povečal in ni izhajal iz „‚nepredvidenega razvoja dogodkov‘“ ter ne bi izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena XIX GATT.
These parties also claimed that in the 2002 Steel safeguard investigation the Commission carried out a separate analysis per product category for which reason the same individual assessment should also be carried out in this case.
Te strani so trdile tudi, da je Komisija v okviru zaščitne preiskave jekla leta 2002 izvedla ločeno analizo za vsako kategorijo izdelkov, zaradi česar bi bilo treba v tem primeru izvesti tudi isto individualno oceno.
Finally, several interested parties contested the interrelations and interconnections between product categories that the Commission put forward to justify its single analysis.
Nazadnje je več zainteresiranih strani izpodbijalo medsebojne povezave in medsebojno povezanost med kategorijami izdelkov, ki jih je Komisija predložila, da bi utemeljila svojo globalno analizo.
These parties, while recognising that such linkages do exist between certain product categories, were of the view that they are not present across all categories, for instance between carbon steel and stainless steel categories, or between flat products, long products and pipes.
Te strani so priznale, da take povezave med nekaterimi kategorijami izdelkov sicer obstajajo, vendar menijo, da te povezave niso prisotne v vseh kategorijah, na primer med kategorijami ogljikovega jekla in nerjavnega jekla ali med ploščatimi izdelki, podolgovatimi izdelki in cevmi.
The Commission analysed these claims and rejected them on the following basis.
Komisija je te trditve analizirala in jih zavrnila na naslednji podlagi.
First, the Notice of Initiation clearly states repeatedly and without doubt that the 28 product categories under investigation were treated as a single group of products for the purposes of analysing whether the conditions for adopting safeguards were warranted.
Prvič, obvestilo o začetku jasno in večkrat nedvoumno navaja, da je bilo 28 kategorij izdelkov, ki so predmet preiskave, obravnavanih kot ena sama skupina izdelkov, da bi se analiziralo, ali so bili pogoji za sprejetje zaščitnih ukrepov utemeljeni.
In fact, the provisional Regulation refers to the 28 product categories as the ‘product concerned’ or ‘the product categories concerned’ (see recital (11) of the provisional Regulation) and the analysis therein is made on the basis of the 28 product categories concerned taken all together (see recital (22) of the provisional Regulation).
Začasna uredba se namreč nanaša na 28 kategorij izdelkov kot „zadevni izdelek“ ali „zadevne kategorije izdelkov“ (glej uvodno izjavo 11 začasne uredbe), analiza v navedeni uredbi pa temelji na 28 zadevnih kategorijah izdelkov (glej uvodno izjavo 22 začasne uredbe).
Thus, the reference to ‘products concerned’ should be understood as the product categories examined together as part of a single product concerned.
Zato je treba sklicevanje na „zadevne izdelke“ razumeti kot kategorije izdelkov, ki se obravnavajo skupaj kot del posameznega zadevnega izdelka.
Second, the WTO Agreement on Safeguards does not impose any specific obligations with respect to the definition or the scope of the product under investigation and does not contain any guidelines with respect to this matter, as confirmed by a WTO Panel.
Drugič, Sporazum STO o zaščitnih ukrepih ne nalaga nobenih posebnih obveznosti v zvezi z opredelitvijo ali obsegom izdelka v preiskavi in ne vsebuje smernic v zvezi s tem, kot potrjuje odbor STO.
Indeed, a safeguard measure may be applied to a product, imports of which have increased; however, a disaggregated analysis for all cases in which the definition of the product under investigation comprises more than one product is not required.
Zaščitni ukrep se lahko uporabi za izdelek, katerega uvoz se je povečal, razčlenjena analiza za vse primere, v katerih opredelitev izdelka v preiskavi vsebuje več kot en izdelek, pa ni potrebna.
Accordingly, it is the investigating authority which defines the product under investigation, as well as the way in which the relevant data should be analysed in the investigation.
Zato opredelitev izdelka v preiskavi, kakor tudi način, kako bi bilo treba zadevne podatke analizirati v preiskavi, določi preiskovalni organ.
Moreover, no claim has been brought explaining how, in the circumstances of the present case, the joint consideration of product categories could have affected the analysis made by the Commission and/or resulted in an inadequate determination of the increase in imports during the period of investigation.
Poleg tega ni bilo pojasnjeno, kako bi lahko v okoliščinah obravnavanega primera skupna obravnava kategorij izdelkov vplivala na analizo, ki jo je opravila Komisija, in/ali povzročila neustrezno določitev povečanja uvoza med obdobjem preiskave.
Finally, and incidentally, the Commission also notes that the Appellate Body ruling referred to by the parties concerns the analysis of unforeseen development, and not as such the issue of whether a global analysis is permitted under the WTO Agreement on Safeguards.
Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da se odločitev pritožbenega organa, na katero se sklicujejo strani, nanaša na analizo nepredvidenega razvoja in ne na vprašanje, ali je globalna analiza dovoljena v skladu s Sporazumom STO o zaščitnih ukrepih.
Third, although the Commission reiterated and confirmed in its final determination the need to carry out in the present case an overall analysis of the conditions required to impose safeguards, in order to further examine the linkage between certain categories as argued by some interested parties, the Commission further decided to examine the 28 product categories under investigation, which are treated formally as a single group, also as three steel ‘product families’.
Tretjič, čeprav je Komisija v svoji končni določitvi ponovila in potrdila, da je treba v tem primeru izvesti splošno analizo pogojev, potrebnih za uvedbo zaščitnih ukrepov, da bi nadalje preučila povezavo med nekaterimi kategorijami, kot so trdile nekatere zainteresirane strani, se je nato odločila, da preuči 28 kategorij izdelkov, ki so predmet preiskave in se uradno obravnavajo kot ena skupina ali tri družine izdelkov iz jekla.
This decision has been taken in order to examine, in addition, whether the findings for the single group are confirmed at more disaggregated level and to dispel any doubts about the reliability of the conclusions reached at an overall level.
Ta odločitev je bila sprejeta z namenom, da se poleg tega preuči, ali so ugotovitve za eno skupino potrjene na bolj razčlenjeni ravni, in da se odpravijo vsi dvomi glede zanesljivosti sprejetih ugotovitev na splošni ravni.
The three steel product families regroup certain product categories showing an even stronger degree of commonalities between them.
Tri družine izdelkov iz jekla združujejo nekatere kategorije izdelkov, kar kaže na še večjo stopnjo skupne podobnosti med njimi.
Indeed, the steel industry commonly uses three steel product families, namely: flat products, long products and tubes.
Namreč, v jeklarski industriji se uporabljajo tri družine izdelkov iz jekla, in sicer: ploščati izdelki, podolgovati izdelki in cevi.
In the framework of this safeguard investigation, it is considered that within each of these families, the products present similar characteristics, frequently share production processes, are often the input for other downstream products within the family, have common users or customers in the supply chain, which is why their supply and demand substitutability and intra-‘family’ competition is more marked than if all steel product categories were taken together in a single group.
V okviru te zaščitne preiskave se šteje, da imajo izdelki v vsaki od teh družin podobne značilnosti, se pogosto uporabljajo za enake proizvodne postopke, so pogosto vložki za druge izdelke na koncu proizvodne verige v družini, imajo skupne uporabnike ali odjemalce v dobavni verigi, zato sta njihova zamenljivost pri ponudbi in povpraševanju ter konkurenca znotraj družine večji, kot če bi bile vse kategorije izdelkov iz jekla združene v eni sami skupini.
The three ‘product families’ are defined as follows:
Tri „družine izdelkov“ so opredeljene na naslednji način:
Product families
Družine izdelkov
Product family
Družina izdelkov
Product category
Kategorija izdelka
1 Flat products
1 Ploščati izdelki
2 Long products
2 Podolgovati izdelki
3 Tubes
3 Cevi
Accordingly, the Commission will address the comments made by certain interested parties as regards the broad definition of the product concerned by complementing the overall assessment of the 28 product categories under investigation with an analysis per product family as defined above.
V skladu s tem bo Komisija obravnavala pripombe, ki so jih izrazile nekatere zainteresirane strani v zvezi s široko opredelitvijo zadevnega izdelka, in sicer tako, da bo splošno oceno 28 kategorij izdelkov, ki so predmet preiskave, dopolnila z analizo posamezne družine izdelkov, kakor je opredeljena zgoraj.
Requests concerning specific product categories
Zahtevki za posamezne kategorije izdelkov
Several interested parties claimed that certain specific product categories should be excluded from the scope of the product concerned, due to an alleged lack or limited availability of Union production.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da bi bilo treba nekatere posebne kategorije izdelkov zaradi domnevnega pomanjkanja ali omejene razpoložljivosti proizvodnje Unije izključiti iz obsega zadevnega izdelka.
These claims concern notably the following product categories:
Te trditve se nanašajo zlasti na naslednje kategorije izdelkov:
Non-grain oriented electrical sheets used in motors and generators manufacturing (falling within product category 3);
elektropločevina, ki ni zrnato usmerjena in se uporablja pri proizvodnji motorjev in generatorjev (ki spadajo v kategorijo izdelkov 3),
Steel parts used as inputs in the automotive industry (falling within product category 4);
jekleni deli, ki se uporabljajo kot vložki v avtomobilski industriji (ki spadajo v kategorijo izdelkov 4),
Tin mill products (falling within product category 6);
izdelki iz bele pločevine (ki spadajo v kategorijo izdelkov 6).
The Commission analysed carefully these claims and came to the conclusion that like or directly competing product categories are in fact produced in the Union by the Union industry.
Komisija je te trditve skrbno analizirala in ugotovila, da podobne ali neposredno konkurenčne kategorije izdelkov dejansko proizvaja industrija Unije v Uniji.
Furthermore, as it will be elaborated below in the section on Union interest, the Commission has shaped the safeguard measures in such a way as to ensure that disruption to imports is minimised and traditional import levels from trading partners are preserved.
Poleg tega je Komisija, kot bo podrobneje pojasnjeno v oddelku o interesu Unije, zaščitne ukrepe oblikovala tako, da je zagotovila, da se čim bolj zmanjšajo motnje uvoza in ohranijo tradicionalne ravni uvoza iz trgovskih partneric.