natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
That procedure will create transparency for undertakings and public authorities that have expressed their interest in deploying in this area, so that, when designing their business plans, they can assess the likely competition that they will face from other networks.
Veljati bi moralo, da gre za hudo malomarnost tudi takrat, ko podjetje ali javni organ ne ve, da so posredovane informacije zavajajoče, napačne ali nepopolne, vendar bi to moralo vedeti, če bi ravnalo z dolžno skrbnostjo ali z organizacijo poskrbel za dolžno skrbnost.
The positive effect of such transparency relies on market participants responding truthfully and in good faith.
Glede na negativne posledice za konkurenco in projekte, ki se financirajo iz javnih sredstev, je pomembno, da so kazni dovolj odvračilne.
While market participants can change their deployment plans for unforeseen, objective and justifiable reasons, competent authorities should intervene, including if public funding is affected, and, where appropriate, impose penalties if they have been provided, knowingly or due to gross negligence, by an undertaking or public authority with misleading erroneous or incomplete information.
Določbe o kaznih ne bi smele posegati v pravico zahtevati nadomestilo za škodo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
For the purpose of the relevant provisions on penalties, gross negligence should refer to a situation where an undertaking or a public authority provides misleading, erroneous or incomplete information due to its behaviour or internal organisation which falls significantly below due diligence regarding the information provided.
Da bi se zagotovile predvidljive razmere za naložbe, bi morali imeti pristojni organi možnost, da podjetjem in javnim organom, ki so zainteresirani za postavitev zelo visokozmogljivih omrežij, posredujejo informacije o tem, ali so na zadevnem območju prisotne ali predvidene druge vrste nadgradnje omrežja, vključno s tistimi, ki imajo hitrost prenosa k sebi manj kot 100 Mb/s.
Gross negligence should not require that the undertaking or public authority knows that the information provided is misleading, erroneous or incomplete, but, rather, that it would have known, had it acted or been organised with due diligence.
Pomembno je, da se nacionalni regulativni in drugi pristojni organi posvetujejo z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi o predlaganih odločitvah, jim glede na zahtevnost zadeve zagotovijo dovolj časa za predložitev pripomb in upoštevajo njihova stališča, preden sprejmejo končno odločitev.
It is important that the penalties are sufficiently dissuasive in light of the negative impact on competition and on publicly funded projects.
Da odločitve na nacionalni ravni ne bi negativno vplivale na delovanje notranjega trg ali druge cilje PDEU, bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi obvestiti Komisijo in druge nacionalne regulativne organe tudi o nekaterih osnutkih odločitev in jim tako dati možnost, da dajo pripombe.
The provisions on penalties should be without prejudice to any rights to claim compensation for damages in accordance with national law.
Primerno je, da se pristojni organi, v primerih, opredeljenih v tej direktivi, posvetujejo z zainteresiranimi stranmi o vseh osnutkih ukrepov, ki vplivajo na trgovino med državami članicami.
In the interests of predictable investment conditions, competent authorities should be able to share information with undertakings and public authorities expressing interest in deploying very high capacity networks on whether other types of network upgrades, including those below 100 Mbps download speed, are present or foreseen in the area in question.
V konkurenčnem okolju bi bilo treba upoštevati stališča zainteresiranih strani, tudi uporabnikov in potrošnikov.
It is important that national regulatory and other competent authorities consult all interested parties on proposed decisions, give them sufficient time to the complexity of the matter to provide their comments, and take account of their comments before adopting a final decision.
Da bi bili interesi državljanov ustrezno upoštevani, bi morale države članice vzpostaviti ustrezen mehanizem posvetovanja.
In order to ensure that decisions at national level do not have an adverse effect on the functioning of the internal market or other TFEU objectives, national regulatory authorities should also notify certain draft decisions to the Commission and other national regulatory authorities to give them the opportunity to comment.
Tak mehanizem bi imel lahko obliko organa, ki bi neodvisno od nacionalnih regulativnih organov in ponudnikov storitev raziskoval vprašanja, ki zadevajo potrošnike, kot so vedenje potrošnikov in mehanizmi za zamenjavo ponudnika, in ki bi deloval na pregleden način ter prispeval k obstoječim mehanizmom za posvetovanje z deležniki.
It is appropriate for competent authorities to consult interested parties in the cases defined in this Directive on all draft measures which have an effect on trade between Member States.
Poleg tega bi se lahko vzpostavil mehanizem za ustrezno sodelovanje pri vprašanjih, povezanih s spodbujanjem zakonite vsebine.
In the context of a competitive environment, the views of interested parties, including users and consumers, should be taken into account.
Postopki sodelovanja, sprejeti v skladu s tem mehanizmom, pa ne bi smeli dopuščati sistematičnega nadzora nad uporabo interneta.
In order to appropriately address the interests of citizens, Member States should put in place an appropriate consultation mechanism.
Izvensodni postopki za reševanje sporov so lahko hiter in stroškovno učinkovit način za uveljavljanje pravic končnih uporabnikov, zlasti potrošnikov ter mikropodjetij in malih podjetij, kot so opredeljena v Prilogi k Priporočilu Komisije 2003/361/ES.
Such a mechanism could take the form of a body which would, independently of the national regulatory authority and service providers, carry out research into consumer-related issues, such as consumer behaviour and mechanisms for changing suppliers, and which would operate in a transparent manner and contribute to the existing mechanisms for stakeholder consultation.
Države članice bi morale nacionalnemu regulativnemu organu ali drugemu pristojnemu organu, ki je odgovoren za pravice končnih uporabnikov, ali vsaj enemu neodvisnemu organu, ki je dokazano usposobljen za to področje, omogočiti, da deluje kot organ za alternativno reševanje sporov.
Furthermore, a mechanism could be established for the purpose of enabling appropriate cooperation on issues relating to the promotion of lawful content.
Organi v zvezi z reševanjem sporov ne bi smeli biti vezani na nobena navodila.
Any cooperation procedures agreed pursuant to such a mechanism should, however, not allow for the systematic surveillance of internet use.
Ker so mnoge države članice vzpostavile postopke reševanja sporov tudi za končne uporabnike, ki niso potrošniki, za katere se Direktiva 2013/11/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ne uporablja, je smiselno, da se postopek reševanja sporov, specifičen za ta sektor, za potrošnike in, če države članice tako določijo, tudi za druge končne uporabnike, zlasti mikropodjetja in mala podjetja, ohrani.
Out-of-court dispute resolution procedures may constitute a fast and cost-efficient way for end-users to enforce their rights, in particular for consumers and microenterprises and small enterprises as defined in the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC.
V zvezi z izvensodnim reševanjem sporov bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da ohranijo ali uvedejo pravila, ki presegajo tista iz Direktive 2013/11/EU, da bi zagotovile višjo raven varstva potrošnikov.
Member States should enable the national regulatory authority or another competent authority responsible for, or at least one independent body with proven expertise in dealing with, end-user rights to act as an alternative dispute resolution entity.
Pri sporih med podjetji v eni državi članici na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva, na primer o obveznostih za dostop in medomrežno povezovanje ali o sredstvih za prenos seznamov končnih uporabnikov, bi morala imeti oškodovana stran, ki se je pogajala v dobri veri, vendar ji ni uspelo doseči dogovora, možnost pozvati nacionalni regulativni organ, naj reši spor.
With respect to such dispute resolutions, those authorities should not be subject to any instructions.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali imeti možnost, da stranema predpišejo rešitev.
As many Member States have established dispute resolution procedures also for end-users other than consumers, to whom Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council does not apply, it is reasonable to maintain the sector-specific dispute resolution procedure for both consumers and, where Member States extend it, also for other end-users, in particular microenterprises and small enterprises.
Če nacionalni regulativni organ posreduje pri reševanju spora med ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij ali storitev ali pripadajočih zmogljivosti v državi članici, bi si moral prizadevati za to, da so izpolnjene obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz te direktive.
In relation to out-of-court dispute resolution, Member States should be able to maintain or introduce rules that go beyond those laid down by Directive 2013/11/EU in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection.
Poleg pravice do pritožbe, ki jo določa pravo Unije ali nacionalno pravo, je za rešitev čezmejnih sporov med podjetji, ki zagotavljajo ali so pooblaščena za zagotavljanje elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij ali storitev v različnih državah članicah, potreben preprost postopek, ki se sproži na zahtevo katere koli stranke v sporu.
In the event of a dispute between undertakings in the same Member State in an area covered by this Directive, for example relating to obligations for access and interconnection or to the means of transferring end-user lists, an aggrieved party that has negotiated in good faith but failed to reach agreement should be able to call on the national regulatory authority to resolve the dispute.
Ena od pomembnih nalog BEREC-a je, da sprejema mnenja o čezmejnih sporih, kadar je to primerno.
National regulatory authorities should be able to impose a solution on the parties.
Zato bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi pri ukrepih, s katerimi v takih primerih naložijo obveznost podjetju ali drugače razrešijo spor, v celoti upoštevati mnenje BEREC-a.
The intervention of a national regulatory authority in the resolution of a dispute between providers of electronic communications networks or services or associated facilities in a Member State should seek to ensure compliance with the obligations arising under this Directive.
Če se države članice pri organizaciji uporabe radiofrekvenčnega spektra na svojem ozemlju ne usklajujejo, to lahko, če države članice ne dosežejo rešitve z dvostranskimi pogajanji, privede do obsežnih motenj, ki lahko močno prizadenejo razvoj enotnega digitalnega trga.
In addition to the rights of recourse granted under Union or national law, there is a need for a simple procedure to be initiated at the request of either party in a dispute, to resolve cross-border disputes between undertakings providing, or authorised to provide, electronic communications networks or services in different Member States.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da med njimi ne bi prišlo do čezmejnega in škodljivega motenja.
One important task assigned to BEREC is to adopt, where appropriate, opinions in relation to cross-border disputes.
Skupina za politiko radiofrekvenčnega spektra, ustanovljena s Sklepom Komisije 2002/622/ES, bi morala biti zadolžena za podporo potrebnemu čezmejnemu usklajevanju in delovati kot forum za reševanje sporov o čezmejnih vprašanjih med državami članicami.
National regulatory authorities should therefore fully reflect any opinion submitted by BEREC in their measures imposing any obligation on an undertaking or otherwise resolving the dispute in such cases.
Na podlagi rešitve, ki jo predlaga Skupina za politiko radiofrekvenčnega spektra, se v nekaterih okoliščinah zahteva izvedbeni ukrep za dokončno odpravo čezmejnega motenja ali izvršitev usklajene rešitve v okviru prava Unije, o kateri se dogovorijo dve ali več držav članic v dvostranskih pogajanjih.
Lack of coordination between Member States when organising the use of radio spectrum in their territory can, if not solved through bilateral Member States negotiations, create large-scale interference issues severely impacting on the development of the Digital Single Market.
Do velikih težav z motenjem lahko pride tudi zaradi pomanjkanja usklajevanja med državami članicami in državami, ki mejijo na Unijo.
Member States should take all necessary measures to avoid cross-border and harmful interference between them.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe, da ne bi prišlo do čezmejnega in škodljivega motenja z državami, ki mejijo na Unijo, in v ta namen med seboj sodelovati.
The Radio Spectrum Policy Group (RSPG) established by Commission Decision 2002/622/EC should be tasked with supporting the necessary cross-border coordination and be the designated forum for resolving disputes between Member States on cross border issues.
Unija bi morala na zahtevo držav članic, ki imajo težave zaradi čezmejnega motenja iz tretjih držav zagotoviti vso podporo tem državam članicam.
Building on the RSPG’s proposed solution, an implementing measure is required in some circumstances to resolve cross-border interference definitively or to enforce under Union law a coordinated solution agreed by two or several Member States in bilateral negotiations.
Skupina za politiko radiofrekvenčnega spektra je svetovalna skupina Komisije na visoki ravni, ki je bila ustanovljena s Sklepom 2002/622/ES, da bi prispevala k razvoju notranjega trga in podpirala razvoj politike radiofrekvenčnega spektra na ravni Unije ob upoštevanju gospodarskih, političnih, kulturnih, strateških, zdravstvenih in socialnih vprašanj ter tehničnih parametrov.
Lack of coordination between Member States and countries neighbouring the Union can also create large-scale interference issues.
Sestavljati bi jo morali vodje teles, ki so na splošno politično odgovorni za strateško politiko radiofrekvenčnega spektra.
Member States should take appropriate measures to avoid cross-border and harmful interference with countries neighbouring the Union, and cooperate with each other to that end.
Komisiji naj bi pomagala in svetovala v zvezi s politiko radiofrekvenčnega spektra.
Upon the request of Member States affected by cross-border interference from third countries, the Union should provide its full support for those Member States.
Na ta način bi se morala še bolj povečati vidnost politike radiofrekvenčnega spektra na različnih področjih politike Unije, pripomoglo pa naj bi se tudi k zagotavljanju medsektorske usklajenosti na ravni Unije in na nacionalni ravni.
The RSPG is a Commission high-level advisory group which was created by Decision 2002/622/EC to contribute to the development of the internal market and to support the development of a Union-level radio spectrum policy, taking into account economic, political, cultural, strategic, health and social considerations, as well as technical parameters.
Skupina bi morala tudi svetovati Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu na njuno zahtevo.
It should be composed of the heads of the bodies that have overall political responsibility for strategic radio spectrum policy.
Poleg tega bi morala biti tudi forum, prek katerega bi države članice usklajevale izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti, povezanih z radiofrekvenčnim spektrom, iz te direktive, imeti pa bi morala tudi osrednjo vlogo na področjih, ki so ključna za notranji trg, kot sta čezmejno usklajevanje in standardizacija.
It should assist and advise the Commission with respect to radio spectrum policy.
Lahko bi se ustanovile tudi tehnične ali strokovne delovne skupine, ki bi sodelovale na plenarnih sejah, na katerih visoki predstavniki držav članic in Komisije oblikujejo strateško politiko.
This should further increase the visibility of radio spectrum policy in the various Union policy areas and help to ensure cross-sectorial consistency at Union and national and level.
Komisija je napovedala, da namerava v šestih mesecih po začetku veljavnosti te direktive spremeniti Sklep 2002/622/ES, da bi odražal nove naloge, podeljene Skupini za politiko radiofrekvenčnega spektra s to direktivo.
It should also provide advice to the European Parliament and to the Council upon their request.
Pristojni organi bi morali spremljati in zagotavljati skladnost s pogoji splošne odobritve in pravicami uporabe ter zlasti zagotavljati dejansko in učinkovito uporabo radiofrekvenčnega spektra in skladnost z obveznostmi pokritosti in kakovosti storitev, in sicer z nalaganjem upravnih kazni v primeru kršitev teh pogojev, vključno z denarnimi kaznimi in sodnimi odredbami ter preklicem pravic uporabe.
Moreover, the RSPG should also be the forum for the coordination of implementation by Member States of their obligations related to radio spectrum under this Directive and should play a central role in fields essential for the internal market such as cross-border coordination or standardisation.
Podjetja bi morala pristojnim organom zagotoviti čim natančnejše in popolnejše informacije, da bi jim omogočila izvajanje nadzornih nalog.
Technical or expert working groups could also be created to assist plenary meetings, at which strategic policy is framed through senior-level representatives of the Member States and the Commission.
Pogoji, vezani na splošne odobritve in individualne pravice uporabe, bi morali biti omejeni na tiste, ki so nujno potrebni za zagotovitev izpolnjevanja zahtev in obveznosti v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in pravom Unije.
The Commission has indicated its intention to amend Decision 2002/622/EC within six months of the entry into force of this Directive, in order to reflect the new tasks conferred on the RSPG by this Directive.
Vsaka stran, v zvezi s katero je pristojni organ sprejel odločitev, bi morala imeti pravico do pritožbe pri organu, neodvisnem od udeleženih strank ter zunanjih posegov ali političnih pritiskov, ki bi lahko ogrozili njegovo neodvisno oceno zadev, ki jih obravnava.
Competent authorities should monitor and secure compliance with the terms and conditions of the general authorisation and rights of use, and in particular to ensure effective and efficient use of radio spectrum and compliance with coverage and quality of service obligations, through administrative penalties including financial penalties and injunctions and withdrawals of rights of use in the event of breaches of those terms and conditions.
Ta organ je lahko sodišče.
Undertakings should provide the most accurate and complete information possible to competent authorities to allow them to fulfil their surveillance tasks.
Poleg tega bi moralo imeti vsako podjetje, ki meni, da njegove vloge za odobritev pravic do namestitve zmogljivosti niso bile obravnavane v skladu z načeli iz te direktive, pravico do pritožbe zoper take odločitve.
The conditions attached to general authorisations and individual rights of use should be limited to those strictly necessary to ensure compliance with requirements and obligations under national law and Union law.
Ta pritožbeni postopek ne bi smel posegati niti v delitev pristojnosti v pravosodnih sistemih posameznih držav niti v pravice, ki jih imajo pravne ali fizične osebe v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
Any party subject to a decision of a competent authority should have the right to appeal to a body that is independent of the parties involved and of any external intervention or political pressure which could jeopardise its independent assessment of matters coming before it.
V vsakem primeru bi morale države članice zagotoviti učinkovit sodni nadzor nad takimi odločitvami.
That body can be a court.
Da se zagotovi pravna varnost za akterje na trgu, bi morali pritožbeni organi svoje naloge opravljati učinkovito.
Furthermore, any undertaking which considers that its applications for the granting of rights to install facilities have not been dealt with in accordance with the principles set out in this Directive should be entitled to appeal against such decisions.
Zlasti pritožbeni postopki ne bi smeli biti neupravičeno dolgi.
That appeal procedure should be without prejudice to the division of competences within national judicial systems and to the rights of legal entities or natural persons under national law.
Začasni ukrepi, s katerimi se odloži učinkovanje odločitve pristojnega organa, bi se morali sprejeti le v nujnih primerih, da se prepreči resna in nepopravljiva škoda za stran, ki zahteva te ukrepe, in če je to potrebno zaradi zagotavljanja ravnovesja interesov.
In any case, Member States should grant effective judicial review against such decisions.
Pritožbeni organi zelo različno uporabljajo začasne ukrepe za odložitev izvršitve odločitev nacionalnih regulativnih ali drugih pristojnih organov.
In order to ensure legal certainty for market players, appeal bodies should carry out their functions effectively.
Da bi bil pristop bolj usklajen, bi bilo treba uporabiti skupne standarde v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča.
In particular, appeal proceedings should not be unduly lengthy.
Pritožbeni organi bi morali imeti tudi pravico zahtevati informacije, ki jih objavi BEREC.
Interim measures suspending the effect of the decision of a competent authority should be granted only in urgent cases in order to prevent serious and irreparable damage to the party applying for those measures and if the balance of interests so requires.
Glede na pomembnost pritožb za splošno delovanje regulativnega okvira bi bilo treba v vseh državah članicah vzpostaviti mehanizem za zbiranje informacij o pritožbah in odločitvah o odložitvi izvršitve odločitev, ki jih sprejmejo pristojni organi, ter za sporočanje teh informacij Komisiji in BEREC-u.
There has been a wide divergence in the manner in which appeal bodies have applied interim measures to suspend the decisions of the national regulatory or other competent authorities.
Tak mehanizem bi moral zagotoviti, da lahko Komisija ali BEREC z namenom ustvariti podatkovno bazo, od držav članic pridobita besedila odločitev in sodb.
In order to achieve greater consistency of approach common standards should be applied in line with the case law of the Court of Justice.
V interesu državljanov in deležnikov ter da bi vsem zadevnim stranem omogočili, da izrazijo svoja stališča, bi bilo treba povečati preglednost pri uporabi mehanizma Unije za utrditev notranjega trga elektronskih komunikacij, med drugim tako, da se od nacionalnih regulativnih organov zahteva, da vsak osnutek ukrepa objavijo, ko ga sporočijo Komisiji, BEREC-u in nacionalnim regulativnim organom v drugih državah članicah.
Appeal bodies should also be entitled to request available information published by BEREC.
Vsak tak osnutek ukrepa bi moral biti obrazložen in bi moral vsebovati podrobno analizo.
Given the importance of appeals for the overall operation of the regulatory framework, a mechanism should be set up, in all the Member States, for collecting information on appeals and decisions to suspend decisions taken by the competent authorities and for the reporting of that information to the Commission and to BEREC.
Komisija bi morala imeti po tem, ko je v kar največji meri upoštevala mnenje BEREC-a, možnost, da od nacionalnega regulativnega organa zahteva, naj umakne osnutek ukrepa, kadar ta zadeva opredelitev upoštevnih trgov ali določitev podjetij kot podjetij s pomembno tržno močjo in če bi take odločitve povzročile oviro za notranji trg ali bile nezdružljive s pravom Unije in zlasti s cilji politik, za katere bi si morali prizadevati nacionalni regulativni organi.
That mechanism should ensure that the Commission or BEREC can retrieve from Member States the text of the decisions and judgments with a view to developing a database.
Ta postopek ne posega v postopek uradnega obveščanja iz Direktive (EU) 2015/1535 in posebne pravice Komisije na podlagi PDEU v zvezi s kršitvami prava Unije.