natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Only in cases where the business partners do not agree on the person who may act as exporter or the person is not established in the customs territory of the Union, the exporter is determined by the customs legislation.
Samo v primerih, ko se poslovni partnerji ne strinjajo o tem, kdo lahko deluje kot izvoznik, ali oseba nima sedeža na carinskem območju Unije, se izvoznik določi na podlagi carinske zakonodaje.
In Article 5(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, persons requesting proof of customs status of Union goods, irrespective of whether they are established in the customs territory of the Union or not, should be required to register for an EORI number so that they can access the UCC Proof of Union Status system as referred to in the Annex to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/578.
V členu 5(1) Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446, bi se moralo od oseb, ki zahtevajo dokazilo o carinskem statusu unijskega blaga, ne glede na to, ali imajo sedež na carinskem območju Unije ali ne, zahtevati, da zaprosijo za številko EORI, ki jim omogoča dostop do sistema dokazila o statusu Unije v okviru carinskega zakonika Unije, kot je določen v Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu Komisije (EU) 2016/578.
The customs authorities need a permanent derogation from the obligation to use electronic data-processing techniques in relation to applications and decisions that occur rarely and for which the obligation to deploy electronic data-processing techniques would require a disproportionate economic effort.
Carinski organi potrebujejo trajno odstopanje od obveznosti uporabe tehnik elektronske obdelave podatkov v zvezi z zahtevki in odločbami, ki se pojavijo redko in za katere bi obveznost uporabe tehnik elektronske obdelave podatkov zahtevala nesorazmerno finančno breme.
Given that the range of electronic data-processing techniques differs from Member State to Member State, the applications and decisions in relation to which this derogation should be granted also varies from Member State to Member State.
Glede na to, da se nabor tehnik elektronske obdelave podatkov razlikuje od države članice do države članice, se od države članice do države članice razlikujejo tudi zahtevki in odločbe, v zvezi s katerimi bi se to odstopanje moralo odobriti.
All the Member States must use electronic data-processing techniques with respect to the applications and decisions for which common data requirements exist and for which common electronic systems have been deployed.
Vse države članice morajo uporabiti tehnike elektronske obdelave podatkov v zvezi z zahtevki in odločbami, za katere obstajajo skupne podatkovne zahteve in za katere so bili uvedeni skupni elektronski sistemi.
Accordingly, a new Article 7a of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be laid down allowing the use of other means than electronic data-processing techniques exclusively for applications and decisions for which the relevant data requirements are not set out in Annex A to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446.
Zato bi bilo treba vstaviti nov člen 7a Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446, ki bi izključno za zahtevke in odločbe, za katere zadevne podatkovne zahteve niso določene v Prilogi A k Delegirani uredbi (EU) 2015/2446, omogočal uporabo drugih sredstev, ki niso tehnike elektronske obdelave podatkov.
In order to avoid that the decision-making procedure is unduly delayed by an applicant not providing the right information to the customs authorities despite having been given the opportunity to do so, Article 10(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should not extend the right to be heard to applicants who have been asked to provide relevant information and have failed to do so, resulting in the customs authorities not being able to accept their application.
Da bi preprečili, da bi vložnik, ki carinskim organom ni zagotovil pravih informacij, čeprav mu je bilo to omogočeno, neupravičeno podaljšal postopek odločanja, člen 10(a) Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 ne bi smel razširjati pravice do izjave na vložnike, ki so bili pozvani, naj predložijo ustrezne informacije in tega niso storili, zaradi česar carinski organi niso mogli sprejeti njihovega zahtevka.
The definition of registered exporter in Article 37(21) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be clarified to also cover exporters established in a Member State and registered with the customs authorities of that Member State, for the purpose of exporting products originating in the Union to a country or territory with which the Union has a preferential trade arrangement, so as to allow those exporters to make out origin declarations for benefitting from the preferential trade arrangement concerned.
Opredelitev registriranega izvoznika v členu 37(21) Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 bi bilo treba pojasniti, da bi zajemala tudi izvoznike, ki imajo sedež v državi članici in so registrirani pri carinskih organih te države članice za namene izvoza izdelkov s poreklom iz Unije v državo ali na ozemlje, s katerim je Unija sklenila preferencialni trgovinski sporazum, da bi navedenim izvoznikom omogočili, da sestavijo izjave o poreklu in tako pridobijo koristi iz zadevnega preferencialnega trgovinskega sporazuma.
By contrast, the definition should not include the registration of Union exporters for the purpose of replacing statements on origin when goods are re-consigned to Turkey, because replacement of a proof of origin in the EU when goods are re-consigned to Turkey is not applicable.
Nasprotno, opredelitev ne bi smela vključevati registracije za izvoznike Unije za namene nadomeščanja navedb o poreklu, ko se blago prepošlje v Turčijo, saj se nadomestna dokazila o poreklu v EU, kadar se blago prepošlje v Turčijo, ne uporabljajo.
Article 40 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 provides for the possibility to use means other than electronic data-processing techniques when submitting applications to become a registered exporter.
Člen 40 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 določa možnost, da se ob predložitvi zahtevka za registracijo izvoznika uporabijo druga sredstva, ki niso tehnike elektronske obdelave podatkov.
This permanent derogation should be extended to all communication and exchanges of information in relation to applications and decisions concerning the status of a registered exporter and in relation to any subsequent applications and acts relating to the management of those decisions, as the existing electronic data processing system for registered exporters, the Registered Exporter System (REX) referred to in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/578, does not currently include a harmonised interface for communications with economic operators.
To trajno odstopanje bi bilo treba razširiti na vse sporočanje in izmenjavo informacij v zvezi z zahtevki in odločbami o statusu registriranega izvoznika in za naknadne zahtevke in dejanja v zvezi z upravljanjem teh odločb, saj obstoječi sistem za elektronsko obdelavo podatkov registriranih izvoznikov, tj. sistem registriranih izvoznikov (REX) iz Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu (EU) 2016/578, trenutno ne vključuje usklajenega vmesnika za komunikacijo z gospodarskimi subjekti.
The derogation is temporary and will not be needed once the REX system will provide that harmonized interface.
Odstopanje je začasno in ne bo več potrebno, ko bo za sistem REX zagotovljen navedeni usklajeni vmesnik.
In order to ensure compliance with the rules on origin of the goods, the customs authorities in Member States and the competent authorities in beneficiary countries applying bilateral or regional cumulation, as set out in Article 53 and Article 55(8) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, should carry out all the necessary verifications and controls of origin and not only control the issue or making out of proofs of origin.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti s pravili o poreklu blaga bi morali carinski organi v državah članicah ter pristojni organi v upravičenih državah, ki uporabljajo dvostranske ali regionalne kumulacije, kakor je določeno v členu 53 in členu 55(8) Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446, opraviti vsa potrebna preverjanja in kontrole porekla in ne le kontrolirati izdajo ali izdelavo dokazil o poreklu.
In order to make clearer the rule for determination of origin in the case of regional cumulation, the second and third subparagraphs of Article 55(4) and of Article 55(6) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be merged.
Da bi pojasnili pravilo za določitev porekla v primeru regionalne kumulacije, bi bilo treba drugi in tretji pododstavek člena 55(4) in člena 55(6) Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 združiti.
In order to ensure consistency with the terms used in Article 166(1)(b) and (c), Article 167(1)(s), Article 168 and Article 169 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, the wording in Article 76 of that Delegated Regulation concerning the derogation for the calculation of the amount of import duty on processed products resulting from inward processing should be amended.
Da bi se zagotovila skladnost z izrazi, uporabljenimi v členu 166(1)(b) in (c), členu 167(1)(s), členu 168 in členu 169 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446, bi bilo treba besedilo člena 76 navedene delegirane uredbe o odstopanju od izračuna zneska uvozne dajatve za oplemenitene proizvode iz postopka aktivnega oplemenitenja spremeniti.
For reasons of clarity, Article 82 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should refer to the Annexes in which the relevant common data requirements for the undertaking of the guarantor are set out.
Zaradi jasnosti bi se moral člen 82 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 sklicevati na priloge, v katerih so določene zadevne skupne podatkovne zahteve za izjavo poroka.
In order to ensure consistency of the provisions concerning guarantees, the reference in Article 83 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 to Member States should be replaced by a reference to customs authorities.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti z določbami v zvezi z zavarovanji, bi bilo treba sklicevanje v členu 83 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 na države članice nadomestiti s sklicevanjem na carinske organe.
The time-limit for taking decisions on repayment or remission provided for in Article 97 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be extended where it is not possible for the competent customs authority to complete an assessment and take a decision on repayment or remission in the due period of time because the decision to be taken depends on the outcome of a case involving identical or comparable questions of facts and of law pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union in accordance with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or of specific pending administrative procedures which may affect that decision.
Rok za sprejetje odločb o povračilu ali odpustu iz člena 97 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 bi bilo treba podaljšati, če pristojni carinski organ ne more zaključiti ocene in sprejeti odločbe o povračilu ali odpustu v ustreznem roku, ker je odločba odvisna od izida zadeve, ki vključuje enaka ali primerljiva dejanska in pravna vprašanja in ki poteka pred Sodiščem Evropske unije v skladu s členom 267 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ali od določenega upravnega postopka v teku, ki bi lahko vplival na navedeno odločbo.
In order to ensure that the extension of the period to decide does not adversely affect the applicant, that extension should be possible only if the applicant does not oppose to it and should be clearly limited to those specific situations.
Za zagotovitev, da podaljšanje roka za odločanje ne posega negativno v položaj vložnika, bi moralo biti navedeno podaljšanje mogoče le, če vložnik temu ne nasprotuje, in bi moralo biti jasno omejeno na navedene specifične primere.
In order to ensure the smooth flow in the trade of Union goods between parts of the customs territory of the Union to which Council Directive 2006/112/EC or Council Directive 2008/118/EC apply and parts of that territory where those provisions do not apply (special fiscal territories), Articles 114 and 134 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should establish certain simplifications concerning the customs formalities and controls that are applicable to that trade when it takes place within the same Member State.
Da bi zagotovili nemoten pretok v trgovini z unijskim blagom med deli carinskega območja Unije, za katere se uporablja Direktiva Sveta 2006/112/ES ali Direktiva Sveta 2008/118/ES, in deli navedenega območja, za katere se navedena akta ne uporabljata (ozemlja s posebno davčno ureditvijo), bi morala člena 114 in 134 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 določati nekatere poenostavitve v zvezi s carinskimi formalnostmi in kontrolami, ki se uporabljajo za navedeno trgovino, če poteka v isti državi članici.
Under Article 115 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 a place other than the competent customs office may be approved for the purposes of the presentation of goods under the condition that the goods are declared for a customs procedure or are re-exported within a very short period of time.
V skladu s členom 115 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 se za namene predložitve blaga lahko odobri kraj, ki ni pristojni carinski urad, pod pogojem, da je blago dano v carinski postopek ali pa se ponovno izvozi v zelo kratkem času.
That period should be slightly extended so that more economic operators can comply with that condition.
Ta rok bi bilo treba nekoliko podaljšati, da bi lahko več gospodarskih subjektov izpolnjevalo ta pogoj.
The same extension should apply to the condition regarding the approval of a place other than a temporary storage facility for temporary storage of goods.
Enako podaljšanje bi moralo veljati za pogoj glede odobritve kraja za začasno hrambo blaga, ki ni prostor za začasno hrambo blaga.
In order to protect the information on the place of catch of the fishery products when the printout of the fishing logbook is provided to the authorities of third countries so that those authorities can certify that sea-fishing products and goods transhipped and transported through their country or territory have not been manipulated, the economic operators should be allowed to remove that information from the fishing logbook printout for the purposes of that certification.
Za zaščito informacij o kraju ulova ribiških proizvodov, kadar se organom tretje države predloži izvod ribolovnega ladijskega dnevnika, da ti organi lahko potrdijo, da proizvodi morskega ribolova in blago, pridobljeno iz teh proizvodov, ki se pretovarjajo in prevažajo prek njihove države ali ozemlja, niso bili spremenjeni, bi bilo treba gospodarskim subjektom omogočiti, da za namene tega potrdila navedene informacije odstranijo iz izvoda ribolovnega ladijskega dnevnika.
In order to enable the allocation of the sea-fishing products and goods to the respective fishing logbook in the cases where the certification of non-manipulation is provided on a form or document other than the printout of the fishing logbook, the economic operator should include in that other form or document a reference to the respective fishing logbook.
Da bi se omogočila dodelitev proizvodov morskega ribolova in blaga, pridobljenega iz teh proizvodov, zadevnemu ribolovnemu ladijskemu dnevniku v primerih, v katerih je potrdilo o neposeganju podano v obliki ali z dokumentom, ki ni izvod ribolovnega ladijskega dnevnika, bi gospodarski subjekt v navedeno obliko ali dokument moral vključiti sklic na zadevni ribolovni ladijski dnevnik.
The possibility in Article 136 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 to declare a means of transport for temporary admission orally should be extended to cover the specific situations referred to Articles 214, 215 and 216 of that Delegated Regulation because the standard customs formalities are normally unnecessary for such goods.
Možnost iz člena 136 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 za vložitev ustne deklaracije za začasni uvoz za prevozna sredstva bi bilo treba razširiti tudi na posebne primere iz členov 214, 215 in 216 navedene delegirane uredbe, ker standardne carinske formalnosti običajno niso potrebne za tako blago.
The calculation of the amount of import duty in certain cases of inward processing has been provided for twice in the same way in Articles 76(b) and 168(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446.
Izračun zneska uvozne dajatve v nekaterih primerih aktivnega oplemenitenja je bil določen dvakrat na enak način, in sicer v členu 76(b) in členu 168(2) Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446.
This overlap should be removed by deleting Article 168(2).
To prekrivanje bi bilo treba odpraviti s črtanjem člena 168(2).
End-use authorisations allowing the storage together of different products falling within Chapters 27 and 29 of the Combined Nomenclature (‘mixed storage’) should establish sufficient guarantees for the subsequent identification of the different goods that have been mixed and for enabling their supervision by customs.
Dovoljenja za posebno rabo, ki omogočajo skupno skladiščenje različnih proizvodov iz poglavij 27 in 29 kombinirane nomenklature („mešano skladiščenje“), bi morala zagotoviti zadostna jamstva za nadaljnjo identifikacijo različnega blaga, ki je bilo zmešano, in za omogočanje njihovega carinskega nadzora.
A similar provision to that existing under the repealed Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 should be introduced into Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446.
Podobno določbo, kot že obstaja v razveljavljeni Uredbi Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93, bi bilo treba vključiti v Delegirano uredbo (EU) 2015/2446.
In order to ensure consistency with Article 118(4) of the Code, Article 189 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should allow for defective goods or goods not complying with the terms of the contract to be placed under external transit procedure, instead of being taken out of the customs territory of the Union, both of which leads for those goods to the loss of their customs status of Union goods.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti s členom 118(4) zakonika bi moral člen 189 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 omogočati, da je poškodovano blago ali blago, ki ne izpolnjuje pogojev pogodbe, dano v postopek zunanjega tranzita, namesto da se iznese s carinskega območja Unije, pri čemer v obeh primerih navedeno blago izgubi svoj carinski status unijskega blaga.
With a view to simplifying the use of the export procedure followed by a transit procedure and in order to eliminate the risk that a customs debt and a debt for other charges not covered by a guarantee arises, Union goods exported to a third country and moved through the customs territory of the Union under a TIR operation or under a transit procedure in accordance with the ATA/Istanbul Convention should be required to be placed under the external transit procedure and hence become non-Union goods.
Da bi poenostavili uporabo izvoznega postopka, ki mu sledi postopek tranzita, in da bi odpravili nevarnost nastanka carinskega dolga in dolga za druge dajatve, ki niso zajete z zavarovanjem, bi bilo treba unijsko blago, izvoženo v tretjo državo, ki se giblje prek carinskega območja Unije v okviru operacije TIR ali v okviru postopka tranzita v skladu s Konvencijo ATA / Istanbulsko konvencijo, dati v zunanji postopek tranzita, s čimer bi postalo neunijsko blago.
In order to facilitate the supervision by the customs authorities of movements of goods referred to in Article 1 of Council Directive 2008/118/EC placed under the export procedure followed by the transit procedure, those goods should be allowed to be placed under the external transit procedure, by which they lose their customs status of Union goods.
Za lažji carinski nadzor gibanja blaga iz člena 1 Direktive Sveta 2008/118/ES, ki je dano v izvozni postopek, ki mu sledi postopek tranzita, bi bilo treba za navedeno blago omogočiti, da je lahko dano v postopek zunanjega tranzita, s čimer izgubi svoj carinski status unijskega blaga.
In order to facilitate the processing of applications by customs authorities and to make the application process more efficient for economic operators authorised consignors should be allowed to submit applications for an authorisation to use seals of a special type to the customs authority which is competent to grant the status of authorised consignor.
Da se carinskim organom omogoči lažja obravnava zahtevkov in da bi bil postopek predložitve zahtevkov za gospodarske subjekte učinkovitejši, bi bilo treba pooblaščenim pošiljateljem omogočiti, da predložijo zahtevke za pridobitev dovoljenja za uporabo posebnih carinskih oznak carinskemu organu, ki je pristojen za podelitev statusa pooblaščenega pošiljatelja.
A number of provisions relating to temporary admission refer to means of transport used privately or commercially.
Številne določbe v zvezi z začasnim uvozom zadevajo prevozno sredstvo za zasebno ali poslovno rabo.
The meaning of those terms should be clarified for the purposes of all the rules on total relief from import duty in the context of temporary admission.
Pomen navedenih pojmov bi bilo treba pojasniti za namene vseh predpisov o popolni oprostitvi uvozne dajatve v okviru začasnega uvoza.
The definitions laid down in Article 215(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should therefore be converted into a more general rule in Article 207 of that Delegated Regulation.
Opredelitev iz člena 215(4) Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 bi bilo zato treba preoblikovati v bolj splošno pravilo v členu 207 navedene delegirane uredbe.
A new paragraph should be introduced into Article 215 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, so that natural persons who have their habitual residence in the customs territory of the Union may benefit from the temporary admission procedure so that they can use privately hired non-Union means of road transport in the Union.
Dodati bi bilo treba nov odstavek v členu 215 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446, tako da bodo fizične osebe, ki imajo običajno prebivališče na carinskem območju Unije, lahko izkoristile postopek začasnega uvoza in tako v Uniji uporabile cestna prevozna sredstva, ki so bila za zasebne namene najeta izven Unije.
Opening this possibility would solve some problems facing car rental agencies and encourage border tourism.
Z zagotovitvijo te možnosti bi rešili nekatere težave, s katerimi se soočajo agencije za najem vozil, in spodbudili obmejni turizem.
However, as temporary admission is mainly designed for persons established outside of the Union, Article 218 should limit such private use to a short period of time.
Vendar, ker je začasni uvoz zasnovan predvsem za osebe s sedežem zunaj Unije, bi moral člen 218 omejiti takšno uporabo v zasebne namene na kratko časovno obdobje.
The use of the temporary admission procedure in accordance with Article 218, Article 220, Article 223, Article 228 and Articles 231 to 236 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should also be allowed where the holder of the procedure is established inside the customs territory of the Union.
Uporaba postopka začasnega uvoza v skladu s členom 218, 220, 223, 228 in členi 231 do 236 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 bi morala biti dovoljena tudi, kadar ima imetnik postopka sedež na carinskem območju Unije.
This flexibility is needed because there is no reason justifying a different treatment of persons established in and outside the customs territory of the Union for the purposes of temporary import of certain goods, such as goods to be exhibited or used at a public event.
Ta prožnost je potrebna, ker ni razloga, ki upravičuje različno obravnavanje oseb s sedežem na carinskem območju Unije in zunaj njega za namene začasnega uvoza določenega blaga, kot je blago, ki se razstavi ali uporabi na javni prireditvi.
In order to ensure that the legal provisions are properly implemented in the relevant electronic systems, certain provisions of Annexes A and B to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be amended.
Da bi v zadevnih elektronskih sistemih zagotovili ustrezno izvajanje pravnih predpisov, bi bilo treba spremeniti nekatere določbe iz prilog A in B k Delegirani uredbi (EU) 2015/2446.