natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission assessed that the claims above made by the CCCME concerning interchangeability, regulatory requirements and consumer perception were a repetition of those already addressed in recitals (67) to (73) of the provisional Regulation.
Komisija je ocenila, da so zgornje trditve zbornice CCCME glede medsebojne zamenljivosti, regulativnih zahtev in dojemanja potrošnikov ponovitev tistih, ki so že bile obravnavane v uvodnih izjavah 67 do 73 začasne uredbe.
The Commission noted that its proposal to extend the requirement of third-party liability insurance to all electric bicycles, used by the CCCME to substantiate the claimed difference in consumer perception, equally showed that the differences in regulatory requirements were evolving and did not provide a suitable and stable basis to exclude speed electric bicycles from the product scope.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je njen predlog za razširitev zavarovanja odgovornosti do tretjih oseb na vsa električna kolesa, ki ga je zbornica CCCME uporabila za podkrepitev zatrjevane razlike pri dojemanju potrošnikov, enako pokazal, da se razlike pri regulativnih zahtevah razvijajo, ter da ni zagotovil primerne in trdne podlage za izključitev hitrih električnih koles iz obsega izdelka.
The Commission concluded that the additional information submitted was not of a nature to alter its findings regarding the product scope, namely that electric bicycles share the same basic physical characteristics and properties and that consumer perception and uses overlap significantly.
Komisija je sklepala, da dodatne predložene informacije niso bile takšne, da bi spremenile njene ugotovitve glede obsega izdelka, namreč, da imajo električna kolesa enake osnovne fizikalne lastnosti ter da se dojemanje potrošnikov in uporabe precej prekrivajo.
The arguments of the CCCME were therefore rejected.
Argumenti zbornice CCCME so bili zato zavrnjeni.
One interested party argued that the product scope of the investigation should be limited to low-end electric bicycles.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da bi bilo treba obseg izdelka v preiskavi omejiti na nizkocenovna električna kolesa.
Mid- and high-end electric bicycles should be removed from the product scope, since there is allegedly no dumping taking place in the mid-and high-end segment of electric bicycles.
Srednje- in visokocenovna električna kolesa naj bi bilo treba odstraniti iz obsega izdelka, saj v segmentu srednje- in visokocenovnih električnih koles domnevno ni dampinga.
That interested party claimed that quality and performance, price, cost and profit margin of electric bicycles could be used to differentiate between those market segments.
Trdila je, da bi se lahko kakovost in zmogljivost, cena, stroški ter profitna marža električnih koles uporabili za razlikovanje med navedenimi tržnimi segmenti.
The Commission recalled that the product concerned and the like product were defined on the basis of their physical characteristics.
Komisija je spomnila, da sta bila zadevni izdelek in podobni izdelek opredeljena na podlagi fizikalnih lastnosti.
Criteria such as price, cost and profit margin cannot be used to define the product concerned.
Meril, kot so cena, stroški in profitna marža, ni mogoče uporabiti za opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
As to quality and performance, beyond the fact that the interested party did not explain how to measure and quantify these elements in a systematic way, the Commission recalls that quality and performance can be taken into account through adjustments for physical characteristics.
Kar zadeva kakovost in zmogljivost, poleg dejstva, da zainteresirana stran ni razložila, kako sistematično meriti in kvantificirati te elemente, Komisija opozarja, da se kakovost in zmogljivost lahko upoštevata prek prilagoditev za fizikalne lastnosti.
In any event, even if they were relevant for defining the product scope, quod non, the Commission notes that although several interested parties put forward similar claims during the investigation, none provided any pertinent information that would have justified or allowed for a possible segmentation of the market.
Tudi če bi bili pomembni za opredelitev obsega izdelka, kar pa nista, Komisija vsekakor ugotavlja, da čeprav je več zainteresiranih strani v preiskavi podalo podobne trditve, nobena ni predložila ustreznih informacij, ki bi upravičile ali omogočile morebitno segmentacijo trga.
In the absence of any evidence, the Commission in any event had to reject that argument and confirmed the findings laid out in recital (122) of the provisional Regulation.
Ker dokazov ni bilo, je Komisija navedeni argument vsekakor morala zavrniti in je potrdila ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 122 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments with respect to the product scope, the Commission confirmed the conclusions set out in recitals (67) to (74) of the provisional Regulation.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb glede obsega izdelka, je Komisija potrdila sklepe iz uvodnih izjav 67 do 74 začasne uredbe.
No comments were received regarding the choice of the Union industry as analogue country and no alternative analogue countries were suggested.
Glede izbire industrije Unije kot primerljive države niso bile prejete nobene pripombe niti niso bile predlagane alternativne primerljive države.
Recital (103) of the provisional Regulation is therefore confirmed.
Uvodna izjava 103 začasne uredbe se zato potrdi.
As set out in recital (103) of the provisional Regulation, the normal value was based on the prices actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 103 začasne uredbe, je normalna vrednost temeljila na cenah, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo v Uniji za podobni izdelek.
No comments on that point were received.
Glede tega ni bila prejeta nobena pripomba.
Two Chinese exporting producers disputed the values used for the normal value, taking examples of product type (PCN) pairs where one should be, according to the common understanding in the electric bicycles industry, more expensive than the other, but were in fact cheaper.
Dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika sta ugovarjala vrednostim, uporabljenim za normalno vrednost, pri čemer sta za primer vzela pare vrst izdelkov (kontrolne številke izdelkov), pri katerih bi morala biti ena vrsta glede na splošno razumevanje v industriji električnih koles dražja od druge, v resnici pa je bila cenejša.
Those two exporting producers claimed that the Commission should adjust the normal value per PCN to be more ‘in line’ with the presumed cost of the materials and parts used.
Trdila sta, da bi Komisija morala prilagoditi normalno vrednost glede na kontrolno številko izdelka, da bi bila bolj „v skladu“ s predvidenimi stroški uporabljenih materialov in delov.
That claim was denied, as the normal value is based on actual prices paid in the Union for the like product.
Navedena trditev je bila zavrnjena, saj normalna vrednost temelji na dejanskih cenah, plačanih v Uniji za podobni izdelek.
Each electric bicycle is composed of multiple components, which together with other factors determine the sales price.
Vsako električno kolo je sestavljeno iz več sestavnih delov, ki skupaj z drugimi dejavniki določajo prodajno ceno.
The combined effect of those components and factors can outweigh the impact of the price differences of one particular component as claimed by both exporting producers.
Skupni učinek navedenih sestavnih delov in dejavnikov lahko prevlada nad učinkom cenovnih razlik posameznega sestavnega dela, kakor sta trdila oba proizvajalca izvoznika.
Those two exporting producers did not claim an adjustment for physical differences under Article 2(10)(a) of the Regulation.
Navedena proizvajalca izvoznika nista zahtevala prilagoditve za fizikalne razlike po členu 2(10)(a) uredbe.
Recitals (104) to (106) of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Uvodne izjave 104 do 106 začasne uredbe se zato potrdijo.
Following final disclosure, two exporting producers argued that the explanation provided in recital (51) would be insufficient.
Po dokončnem razkritju sta dva proizvajalca izvoznika trdila, da pojasnilo iz uvodne izjave 51 ni zadostno.
Those exporting producers gave an example of two PCNs differing only in the power level of the engine assistance.
Za primer sta navedla dve kontrolni številki izdelkov, ki sta se razlikovali le po ravni moči motorne pomoči.
In that example, the PCN with the lower-powered engine assistance fell into the more expensive normal value range than the PCN with the higher-powered engine assistance.
V navedenem primeru je bila kontrolna številka izdelka z manjšo motorno pomočjo uvrščena v dražji razpon normalne vrednosti kot kontrolna številka izdelka z večjo motorno pomočjo.
The Commission noted that such a situation was not typical for the normal value used in this investigation, as in most cases the more expensive PCN characteristics fell into more expensive normal value ranges.
Komisija je ugotovila, da to ni običajno pri normalni vrednosti, uporabljeni v tej preiskavi, saj so bile v večini primerov dražje lastnosti kontrolnih številk izdelkov uvrščene v dražje razpone normalne vrednosti.
Indeed, the average normal value of PCNs with the higher assistance level is 60,8 % higher than the PCN's with the lower assistance level.
Pravzaprav je povprečna normalna vrednost kontrolnih številk izdelkov z višjo ravnjo pomoči za 60,8 % višja od povprečne normalne vrednosti kontrolne številke izdelka z nižjo ravnjo pomoči.
The situation referred to in recital (53) can occur without compromising the reliability of this normal value for fair comparison purposes, as the normal value is based on the sales in the Union of multiple Union producers.
Primer iz uvodne izjave 53 se lahko zgodi brez ogrožanja zanesljivosti te normalne vrednosti za pošteno primerjavo, saj normalna vrednost temelji na prodaji več proizvajalcev Unije v Uniji.
Those sales inherently include price differences depending on the particular models influencing the price per PCN in the sales mix.
Ta prodaja neločljivo zajema cenovne razlike glede na posamezne modele, ki vplivajo na ceno na kontrolno številko izdelka v prodajnem naboru.
Also, the normal value of the product concerned presented in ranges seemingly amplifies the price difference in some cases.
Prav tako se zdi, da normalna vrednost zadevnega izdelka, predstavljena v razponih, krepi cenovne razlike v nekaterih primerih.
This is because two PCNs with a very small price difference can be shown in two different ranges if their prices are close to the range limits.
Dve kontrolni številki izdelkov z zelo majhno cenovno razliko bi namreč lahko bili prikazani v dveh različnih razponih, če bi bili njuni ceni blizu mej razpona.
In the absence of any other claims regarding the normal value, recitals (104) to (106) of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Ker drugih trditev glede normalne vrednosti ni bilo, se uvodne izjave 104 do 106 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments regarding the export price, recitals (107) to (109) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede izvozne cene, se uvodne izjave 107 do 109 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One exporting producer claimed that the Commission should not deduct credit costs incurred between the producer and its related sales companies in Europe.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da Komisija ne bi smela odšteti stroškov kredita, nastalih med proizvajalcem in njegovimi povezanimi prodajnimi družbami v Evropi.
That claim was accepted.
Navedena trditev je bila sprejeta.
This resulted in an adjustment to the export price of less than 1 %.
Zato je bila izvozna cena prilagojena, in sicer za manj kot 1 %.
The same exporting producer asked whether the normal value included packaging costs, and if so, whether the comparison with the export price was made ‘packed to packed’.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je vprašal, ali so v normalno vrednost vključeni stroški pakiranja, in če so, ali je bila primerjava z izvozno ceno opravljena z vključenimi stroški pakiranja.
That claim was accepted for all exporting producers as the normal value was determined on the basis of packed liked products.
To je bilo sprejeto za vse proizvajalce izvoznike, saj je bila normalno vrednost določena na podlagi pakiranih podobnih izdelkov.
In recital (116) of the provisional Regulation, the Commission invited interested parties to provide reliable and verifiable quantification of costs for an adjustment under Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation to account for the design, marketing and research and development (R&D) costs of brand-name importers.
Komisija je v uvodni izjavi 116 začasne uredbe pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo zanesljivo in preverljivo količinsko opredelitev stroškov za prilagoditev na podlagi člena 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe, da se upoštevajo stroški oblikovanja, trženja ter raziskav in razvoja, ki jih imajo uvozniki blagovnih znamk.
Two Chinese sampled exporting producers submitted claims for an adjustment under Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation and provided evidence from their brand-name importers in the Union in this regard.
Dva vzorčena kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika sta podala zahtevek za prilagoditev na podlagi člena 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe in v zvezi s tem predložila dokaze svojih uvoznikov blagovnih znamk v Uniji.
The evidence provided consisted of data from the importers concerned regarding R&D and design costs.
Predloženi dokazi so zajemali podatke zadevnih uvoznikov glede stroškov raziskav in razvoja ter oblikovanja.
Those importers had been inspected as part of this investigation.
Navedeni uvozniki so bili pregledani v okviru te preiskave.
The Commission considered the data submitted to justify the claims made and accepted that certain R&D and design costs were indeed required in the operations of the brand-name importers.
Komisija je štela, da predloženi podatki upravičujejo podana zahtevka, in sprejela, da so bili pri poslovanju uvoznikov blagovnih znamk nekateri stroški raziskav in razvoja ter oblikovanja res nujni.
It was however unable to accept the data of the importers selected by the exporting producers as that data covered issues wider than R&D and design costs of brand name importers.
Kljub temu ni mogla sprejeti podatkov uvoznikov, ki sta jih izbrala proizvajalca izvoznika, saj so se nanašali na zadeve, ki presegajo stroške raziskav in razvoja ter oblikovanja, ki jih imajo uvozniki blagovnih znamk.
The significant differences in the reported cost categories expressed as a percentage of the two brand-name importers' turnover did not provide a representative basis for establishing the costs needed for the claimed adjustment.
Znatne razlike v sporočenih kategorijah stroškov, izraženih v odstotkih prihodkov teh dveh uvoznikov blagovnih znamk, niso zagotovile reprezentativne podlage za ugotavljanje stroškov, potrebnih za zatrjevano prilagoditev.
However, the Commission was able to identify those costs in the records of the sampled and verified Union producers, who provided the source of the data for the normal value in this investigation.
Komisiji je kljub temu uspelo najti navedene stroške v evidencah vzorčenih in preverjenih proizvajalcev Unije, ki so zagotovili vir podatkov za normalno vrednost v tej preiskavi.
The sampled and verified Union producers were therefore considered a reliable source of data for a normal value adjustment for R&D and design under Article 2(10)(k).
Zato so bili vzorčeni in preverjeni proizvajalci Unije upoštevani kot zanesljiv vir podatkov za prilagoditev normalne vrednosti za raziskave in razvoj ter oblikovanje v skladu s členom 2(10)(k).
On that basis, the Commission made an adjustment of 2,3 % to the normal value for the three Chinese exporting producers who sold only non-branded electric bicycles, that is to say that they produced electric bicycles in the PRC for brand holders in the Union.
Komisija je na podlagi tega pri treh kitajskih proizvajalcih izvoznikih, ki so prodajali le neoznamčena električna kolesa, tj. ki so v LRK proizvajali električna kolesa za imetnike blagovnih znamk v Uniji, normalno vrednost prilagodila za 2,3 %.
The Union industry noted the initial claims for R&D, design and other adjustments made by the two Chinese exporting producers and argued that such claims should not be accepted.
Industrija Unije je opozorila na prvotna zahtevka dveh kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov glede raziskav in razvoja, oblikovanja in drugih prilagoditev ter trdila, da taki zahtevki ne bi smeli biti sprejeti.
They also argued that the 2,3 % adjustment made by the Commission should not be applied to another Chinese exporting producer, who had not claimed the adjustment.
Poleg tega je trdila, da se 2,3-odstotna prilagoditev Komisije ne bi smela uporabiti pri drugem kitajskem proizvajalcu izvozniku, ki je ni zahteval.
However, concerning the 2,3 % adjustment, the Commission based itself on financial data from the Union industry.
Vendar se je Komisija glede 2,3-odstotne prilagoditve oprla na finančne podatke industrije Unije.
Furthermore, in order to provide for a fair and reasonable comparison between the export price and the normal value, the adjustment had to be made for the three Chinese exporting producers concerned.
Poleg tega je bila za zagotovitev poštene in razumne primerjave med izvozno ceno in normalno vrednostjo prilagoditev potrebna pri treh zadevnih kitajskih proizvajalcih izvoznikih.
The claim of the Union industry was, therefore, rejected.
Trditve industrije Unije so bile zato zavrnjene.
In their comments following final disclosure, the three Chinese exporting producers argued that the R&D and design adjustment should not have been based on the verified Union industry data, but on the data of two unrelated importers provided by the exporting producers following the provisional disclosure.
Trije kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki so v pripombah po dokončnem razkritju trdili, da prilagoditev za raziskave in razvoj ter oblikovanje ne bi smela temeljiti na preverjenih podatkih industrije Unije, ampak na podatkih dveh nepovezanih uvoznikov, ki so jih proizvajalci izvozniki zagotovili po začasnem razkritju.
Those importers also claimed that the Commission had failed to take into account all relevant cost differences needed for the price comparison.
Navedena uvoznika sta tudi trdila, da Komisija ni upoštevala vseh pomembnih stroškovnih razlik, potrebnih za primerjavo cen.
One exporting producer claimed the 2,3 % adjustment to the normal value is too low compared to its own costs relating to branding operations.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je 2,3-odstotna prilagoditev normalne vrednosti prenizka v primerjavi z lastnimi stroški, povezanimi z dejavnostmi znamčenja.
The Commission sufficiently explained the source of that adjustment in recital (61) and notes that only the costs related to the operations of the brand holder importer which were additional to the operations of a standard importer could be taken into account for that adjustment.
Komisija je zadostno pojasnila vir navedene prilagoditve v uvodni izjavi 61 in ugotavlja, da bi se za navedeno prilagoditev lahko upoštevali le stroški, povezani z dejavnostmi uvoznika imetnika blagovne znamke, ki jih je izvajal poleg dejavnosti standardnega uvoznika.
The Commission notes that using the Union industry's data as the source for such an adjustment has been done before, in the proceeding concerning certain cast iron articles originating in the PRC, but the Commission has also used unrelated importers's data, as in the proceeding concerning certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the PRC and Vietnam.
Prvič, Komisiji je uporaba podatkov proizvajalcev Unije omogočila, da pridobi celoten nabor podatkov od vseh proizvajalcev.
In this case, the Commission found it appropriate to use the data of the Union producers who had incurred costs relating to branding.
Zato so uporabljeni podatki bolj reprezentativni kot podatki dveh nepovezanih uvoznikov.
Firstly by using the Union producers's data, the Commission was able to collect a full dataset from all producers.
Drugič, Komisija ni preverila naborov podatkov, ki sta jih zagotovila nepovezana uvoznika, in sicer zato, ker so bili podatki predloženi po preveritvenih obiskih.
Therefore, the data used is more representative than that from two unrelated importers.
Po drugi strani so bili podatki proizvajalcev Unije posebej preverjeni.
Secondly the Commission did not verify the datasets provided by the two unrelated importers, the reason being that data was submitted after the verification visits took place.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da je bila uporaba podatkov istih družb skladnejša, saj so bili podatki industrije Unije uporabljeni za izračun normalne vrednosti in neškodljive cene.
By contrast, the data from the Union producers had been specifically verified.
Po dokončnem razkritju je družba Giant zahtevala, da se 2,3-odstotna prilagoditev za raziskave in razvoj ter oblikovanje uporabi pri delu njene prodaje, kjer je navedene dejavnosti opravila njihova stranka, namreč uvoznik imetnik blagovne znamke.
The Commission further notes that given that the data from the Union industry was used to calculate normal value, as well as to calculate the non-injurious price, using data from the same companies was more coherent.
Prilagoditev je bila odobrena, zato je bila stopnja dampinga znižana za 1,2-odstotne točke.
Following the final disclosure, Giant asked for the R&D and design 2.3 % adjustment to be applied to a part of its sales, where those activities were provided by their customer, namely the brand holder importer.
Rezultat je bil razkrit, k njemu pa niso bile podane nadaljnje pripombe.
That adjustment was granted, leading to a 1,2 % points decrease in its dumping margin.
Trije kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki so ponovili trditev iz uvodnih izjav 118 do 122 začasne uredbe, podano pred začasnim razkritjem, da je treba kontrolno številko izdelka, ki jo je Komisija uporabljala v celotni preiskavi, razširiti tako, da zajame druge elemente.
The result was disclosed and was not subject to further comment.
Navedeni trije kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki niso predložili nobenih novih informacij, ki bi omogočile ponovno preverjanje navedene trditve.
Three Chinese exporting producers reiterated the claim made before provisional disclosure, set out in recitals (118) to (122) of the provisional Regulation, that the PCN used by the Commission throughout the investigation should be expanded to include other elements.
Ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 121 in 122 začasne uredbe so bile v skladu s tem potrjene.
Those three Chinese exporting producers did not provide any new information to allow that claim to be re-examined.
Navedeni trije kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki so po dokončnem razkritju ponovili isto trditev, ne da bi priskrbeli kakršne koli nove informacije.
The findings in recitals (121) to (122) of the provisional Regulation were, accordingly, upheld.
Komisija je v nasprotju z argumenti, podanimi v njihovih zadnjih pripombah, skrbno obravnavala dokaze, ki so jih predložili vzorčeni kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, in vse druge razpoložljive informacije tej svoje sklepe pojasnila v uvodnih izjavah 118 do 122 začasne uredbe.
Those three Chinese exporting producers reiterated the same claim following the final disclosure, without providing any new information.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval dokaze glede ravni trgovanja pri prodaji industriji Unije na domačem trgu, uporabljene za izračun normalne vrednosti, da se ugotovi, ali je bil zahtevek za prilagoditev ravni trgovanja na podlagi člena 2(10)(d)(i) osnovne uredbe upravičen.
Contrary to the arguments put forward in their latest comments, the Commission carefully considered the evidence provided by the sampled Chinese exporting producers and all other available information and explained its conclusions in recitals (118) to (122) of the provisional Regulation.
Navedene informacije, ki so jih vse zainteresirane strani, vključno s kitajskimi proizvajalci izvozniki, štele za zaupne, so zainteresirane strani dale na voljo v razponih v javno dostopni dokumentaciji.