natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2272 of 7 December 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 322, 8.12.2015, p. 21).
Sodba z dne 7. aprila 2016, ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Ostrava in drugi proti Hubei, združeni zadevi C-186/14 P in C-193/14 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:209.
Judgment of 29 January 2014, Hubei Xinyegang Steel v Council, T-528/09, ECLI:EU:T:2014:35.
Obvestilo o sodbah v združenih zadevah C-186/14 P in C-193/14 P v zvezi z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 926/2009 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, in Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2015/2272 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL C 331, 9.9.2016, str. 4).
Judgment of 7 April 2016, ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Ostrava and Others v Hubei, joined cases C-186/14P and C-193/14P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:209.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 4. februarja 2016, C & J Clark International Ltd in Puma SE, združeni zadevi C-659/13 in C-34/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:74, točka 79.
Notice concerning the judgments in Joined cases C-186/14P and C-193/14P in relation to Council Regulation (EC) No 926/2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People's Republic of China and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2272 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, (OJ C 331, 9.9.2016, p. 4).
Sodba Sodišča z dne 15. marca 2018, Deichmann, C-256/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:187, točka 87.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 February 2016, C & J Clark International Ltd and Puma SE, Joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:74, paragraph 79.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 27. januarja 2005, Europe Chemi-Con (Nemčija) proti Svetu, C-422/02 P, ECLI:EU:C:2005:56, točka 33.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 15 March 2018, Deichmann, Case C-256/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:187, paragraph 87.
Glej Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/2272, uvodne izjave 112 do 121.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 27 January 2005, Europe Chemi-Con (Deutschland) v Council, Case C-422/02 P, ECLI:EU:C:2005:56, paragraph 33.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 29. januarja 2014, Hubei Xinyegang Steel proti Svetu, T-528/09, ECLI:EU:T:2014:35, točka 93.
See Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2272, recitals 112 to 121.
Glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 16. aprila 2015, TMK Europe, C-143/14, EU:C:2015:236, točka 19; sklepni predlogi generalne pravobranilke Sharpston z dne 21. maja 2015 v zadevi Fliesen-Zentrum Deutschland, C-687/13, EU:C:2015:349, točka 40; in sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca Warnerja z dne 14. februarja 1979 v zadevi NTN proti Svetu, C-113/77, EU:C:1979:39, str. 1212, po analogiji str. 1243, Svet proti Bank Saderat Iran in Komisija, C-200/13 P, EU:C:2016:284, točka 119, in navedena sodna praksa.
Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2014, Case T-528/09 Hubei Xinyegang Steel v Council, ECLI:EU:T:2014:35, paragraph 93.
Obvestilo, str. 4.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 16 April 2015, Case C-143/14 TMK Europe EU:C:2015:236, paragraph 19; Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston of 21 May 2015, Case C-687/13 Fliesen-Zentrum Deutschland, EU:C:2015:349, paragraph 40; and Opinion of Advocate General Warner of 14 February 1979, Case 113/77 NTN v Council (EU:C:1979:39), p. 1212, at p. 1243 by analogy, Case C-200/13 P Council v Bank Saderat Iran and Commission EU:C:2016:284, at paragraph 119 and the case-law cited.
Kot je prav tako navedeno v opombi 7 prvotne uredbe, so se primerjali povprečni mesečni obsegi.
Notice, page 4.
Uvodna izjava 54 prvotne uredbe.
As also mentioned in the original Regulation in footnote 7, the comparison was carried out between monthly average volumes.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 4. februarja 2016, C&J Clark International Ltd in Puma SE, združeni zadevi C-659/13 in C-34/14.
Recital 54 of the original Regulation.
Sodba z dne 1. julija 2008, Compagnie maritime belge proti Komisiji, T-276/04, EU:T:2008:237, točka 59 in navedena sodna praksa.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 February 2016 in joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14, C&J Clark International Ltd and Puma SE.
Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa, predstavljeni 16. novembra 2000 v zadevi Nachi Europe, C-239/99, EU:C:2000:639, točka 58.
Judgment of 1 July 2008, Compagnie maritime belge v Commission, Case T-276/04, EU:T:2008:237, paragraph 59 and the case-law cited.
Sodbe Splošnega sodišča z dne 2. oktobra 2003, Area Cova proti Svetu in Komisiji, T-196/99, EU:T:2001:281, točka 43; z dne 4. oktobra 2006, Tillack proti Komisiji, T-193/04, EU:T:2006:292, točka 127; in z dne 13. novembra 2008, SPM proti Svetu in Komisiji, T-128/05, EU:T:2008:494, točka 127.
Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs of 16 November 2000, Nachi Europe, Case C-239/99, EU:C:2000:639, paragraph 58.
Po obdobju preiskave se je prav tako poslabšal finančni položaj industrije Unije z nenadnim padcem donosnosti, kar je ob koncu prvega četrtletja leta 2009 povzročilo celo izgube.
Judgments of the General Court of 2 October 2003, Case T-196/99 Area Cova v Council and Commission, EU:T:2001:281 paragraph 43; of 4 October 2006, Case T- 193/04 Tillack v Commission, EU:T:2006:292, paragraph 127; and of 13 November 2008, Case T-128/05 SPM v Council and Commission, EU:T:2008:494, paragraph 127.
Zvišanje prodajnih cen ni moglo spremeniti tega negativnega razvoja.
Council Decision (EU) 2018/929
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2018/929
on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund, for the period 2014 to 2020
o sklenitvi, v imenu Unije, Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi z instrumentom za finančno podporo na področju zunanjih meja in vizumov v okviru Sklada za notranjo varnost za obdobje 2014–2020
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 77(2), in conjunction with point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 218(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 77(2) v povezavi s točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe,
In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2018/404, the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund, for the period 2014 to 2020 (‘the Agreement’) was signed on 15 March 2018, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
V skladu s Sklepom Sveta (EU) 2018/404 je bil Sporazum med Evropsko unijo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi z instrumentom za finančno podporo na področju zunanjih meja in vizumov v okviru Sklada za notranjo varnost za obdobje 2014–2020 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum) podpisan dne 15. marca 2018 s pridržkom njegove poznejše sklenitve.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 22 o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this Decision whether it will implement it in its national law.
Ker ta sklep nadgrajuje schengenski pravni red, se Danska v skladu s členom 4 navedenega protokola v šestih mesecih od dne, ko Svet sprejme ta sklep, odloči, ali ga bo prenesla v svoje nacionalno pravo.
This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC; Ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri katerih Irska v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES ne sodeluje; Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
The Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund, for the period 2014 to 2020 is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
Sporazum med Evropsko unijo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi z instrumentom za finančno podporo na področju zunanjih meja in vizumov v okviru Sklada za notranjo varnost za obdobje 2014–2020 se odobri v imenu Unije.
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 19(2) of the Agreement, in order to express the consent of the European Union to be bound by the Agreement.
Predsednik Sveta v imenu Unije poda uradno obvestilo iz člena 19(2) Sporazuma, s čimer bo izraženo soglasje Evropske unije, da jo Sporazum zavezuje.
Consent of the European Parliament given on 13 March 2018 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2018/404 z dne 13. marca 2018 o podpisu, v imenu Unije, Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi z instrumentom za finančno podporo na področju zunanjih meja in vizumov v okviru Sklada za notranjo varnost za obdobje 2014–2020 (UL L 74, 16.3.2018, str. 1).
Council Decision (EU) 2018/404 of 13 March 2018 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund, for the period 2014 to 2020 (OJ L 74, 16.3.2018, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) št. 515/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. aprila 2014 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za finančno podporo na področju zunanjih meja in vizumov v okviru Sklada za notranjo varnost in o razveljavitvi Odločbe št. 574/2007/ES (UL L 150, 20.5.2014, str. 143).
Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 establishing, as part of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa and repealing Decision No 574/2007/EC (OJ L 150, 20.5.2014, p. 143).
Sklep Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda (UL L 131, 1.6.2000, str. 43).
Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20).
Generalni sekretariat Sveta bo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavil datum začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma.
Council Decision (EU) 2018/934
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2018/934
on the putting into effect of the remaining provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania
o izvajanju preostalih določb schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se nanašajo na schengenski informacijski sistem, v Republiki Bolgariji in Romuniji
Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu Republike Bolgarije in Romunije in zlasti člena 4(2) Akta,
According to the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) of the Act of Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania (‘the 2005 Act of Accession’), the provisions of the Schengen acquis other than those listed in Annex II to that Act, to which the Republic of Bulgaria (‘Bulgaria’) and Romania accede upon accession, are to apply in Bulgaria and Romania pursuant to a Council decision to that effect after verification that the necessary conditions for the application of all parts of the Schengen acquis have been met.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu Republike Bolgarije in Romunije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Akt o pristopu iz leta 2005) se določbe schengenskega pravnega reda, ki niso navedene v Prilogi II k navedenemu aktu, h kateremu ob svojem pristopu pristopita Republika Bolgarija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Bolgarija) in Romunija, v Bolgariji in Romuniji uporabljajo na podlagi sklepa Sveta, ki se sprejme v ta namen, potem ko je preverjeno, da so izpolnjeni vsi potrebni pogoji za uporabo vseh delov schengenskega pravnega reda.
On 29 June 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/365/EU.
Svet je 29. junija 2010 sprejel Sklep 2010/365/EU.
Following that Decision, the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System (‘SIS’) started to apply to Bulgaria and Romania from 15 October 2010, with the exception of the obligation to refuse entry into or stay on its territory to third country nationals for whom an alert has been issued by another Member State for the purposes of refusing entry or stay in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and with the obligation to refrain from issuing SIS alerts and entering additional information as well as from exchanging supplementary information on third country nationals for the purposes of refusing entry or stay in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 (the ‘remaining restrictions’).
Na podlagi tega sklepa so se določbe schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se nanašajo na Schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS), za Bolgarijo in Romunijo začele uporabljati od 15. oktobra 2010, z izjemo obveznosti, da se državljanom tretjih držav, za katere je druga država članica izdala ukrep zavrnitve vstopa ali prepovedi bivanja v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, zavrne vstop na njuno ozemlje ali bivanje na njem, in z obveznostjo, da se ne izdajajo razpisi ukrepov SIS in ne vnašajo dodatne informacije ter se ne izmenjujejo dopolnilni podatki v zvezi z državljani tretjih držav za namene zavrnitve vstopa ali prepovedi prebivanja v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1987/2006 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „preostale omejitve“).
On 9 June 2011, the Council concluded, in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures, that the conditions in all the areas of the Schengen acquis relating to air borders, land borders, police cooperation, data protection, the SIS, sea borders and visas had been fulfilled by Bulgaria and Romania.
Svet je 9. junija 2011 v skladu z veljavnimi postopki schengenskega ocenjevanja sklenil, da Bolgarija in Romunija izpolnjujeta pogoje na vseh področjih schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se nanašajo na zračne meje, kopenske meje, policijsko sodelovanje, varstvo podatkov, SIS, morske meje in vizume.
On 12 October 2017, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2017/1908 putting into effect certain provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Visa Information System (‘VIS’) in Bulgaria and Romania, without prejudice to the separate decision of the Council to be adopted by unanimity in accordance with Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession as regards the lifting of checks at internal borders of the Member States concerned.
Svet je 12. oktobra 2017 sprejel Sklep (EU) 2017/1908, s katerim se uveljavljajo nekatere določbe schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se nanašajo na vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS) v Bolgariji in Romuniji brez poseganja v ločeni sklep Sveta o odpravi kontrol na notranjih mejah v zadevnih državah članicah, ki ga je treba soglasno sprejeti v skladu s členom 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005.
The putting into effect of those provisions which authorises Bulgaria and Romania to access the VIS data for consultation purposes and in accordance with the procedures and conditions specified in that Decision is aiming at facilitating checks by Bulgaria and Romania at border crossing points at their external borders, which are Schengen external borders, and within their territory, thereby increasing the level of security in the Schengen area and facilitating the fight against serious crime and terrorism.
Z uveljavitvijo teh določb, ki Bolgariji in Romuniji dovoljujejo dostop do podatkov VIS za namene vpogleda in v skladu s postopki in pogoji, določenimi v navedenem sklepu, naj bi Bolgariji in Romuniji olajšali kontrole na mejnih prehodih na njunih zunanjih mejah, ki so zunanje schengenske meje, ter na njunem ozemlju, s čimer bi povečali raven varnosti na schengenskem območju in olajšali boj proti hudim kaznivim dejanjem in terorizmu.
In order to increase the level of security in the Schengen area and to make the fight against serious crime and terrorism more effective, the checks by Bulgaria and Romania at their external borders and in their territory should become more effective by issuing SIS alerts for the purposes of refusing entry or stay and by executing such alerts introduced by other Member States, in particular if such alerts are based on a threat to public policy or public security or national security.
Za večjo raven varnosti na schengenskem območju in za učinkovitejši boj proti hudim kaznivim dejanjem in terorizmu bi morale biti kontrole Bolgarije in Romunije na njunih zunanjih mejah in na njunem ozemlju učinkovitejše, in sicer z izdajo razpisov ukrepov v SIS za namene zavrnitve vstopa ali prepovedi bivanja ter z izvrševanjem takšnih razpisov ukrepov, ki so jih vnesle druge države članice, zlasti če ti razpisi ukrepov temeljijo na grožnji javnemu redu ali javni oziroma nacionalni varnosti.
In order to ensure that Bulgaria and Romania have the obligation to refuse entry into or stay on their respective territory to third country nationals for whom an entry ban has been issued by another Member State, as well as the obligation to issue such SIS alerts, it is appropriate to lift the remaining restrictions concerning the use of the SIS.
Da bi zagotovili, da morata Bolgarija in Romunija državljanom tretjih držav, za katere je druga država članica izdala prepoved vstopa, zavrniti vstop ali bivanje na svojem ozemlju, pa tudi, da morata izdajati takšne razpise ukrepov SIS, je ustrezno, da se odpravijo preostale omejitve v zvezi z uporabo SIS.
The lifting of those restrictions in Bulgaria and Romania will contribute to increase the level of security in the Schengen area and make the fight against serious crime and terrorism more effective.
Odprava teh omejitev v Bolgariji in Romuniji bo prispevala k povečanju ravni varnosti na schengenskem območju ter k učinkovitejšemu boju proti hudim kaznivim dejanjem in terorizmu.
It is appropriate to set a date as from which the remaining restrictions of the Schengen acquis relating to the SIS should be lifted.
Primerno je določiti datum, od katerega bi bilo treba odpraviti preostale omejitve glede schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se nanašajo na SIS.
Article 25 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders (‘the Schengen Convention’) on consultation for residence permits and alerts for the purposes of refusing entry should apply from the same date.
Člen 25 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Schengenska konvencija) za posvetovanje o dovoljenja za prebivanje in razpisi ukrepa zavrnitve vstopa bi moral veljati od istega datuma.
This Decision is without prejudice to the lifting of checks at internal borders of the Member States concerned which should be subject to a separate decision of the Council to be adopted by unanimity in accordance with Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession.
Ta sklep ne posega v odpravo kontrol na notranjih mejah v zadevnih državah članicah, ki bi morala biti predmet ločenega sklepa Sveta, ki ga je treba soglasno sprejeti v skladu s členom 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005.
Given that the verification in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures concerning Bulgaria and Romania has already been completed pursuant to Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession, the verification under point (b) Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 will not be carried out in respect of those Member States.
Glede na to, da se je preverjanje v skladu z veljavnimi postopki schengenskega ocenjevanja za Bolgarijo in Romunijo že zaključilo, kot določa člen 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005, se preverjanje iz točke (b) člena 1(1) Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1053/2013 za ti državi članici ne bo izvedlo.
However, following the adoption of this Decision, the lifting of the remaining restrictions on the use of the SIS should come into effect on 1 August 2018.
Po sprejetju tega sklepa pa naj bi odprava preostalih omejitev v zvezi z uporabo SIS začela učinkovati 1. avgusta 2018.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G of Council Decision 1999/437/EC.
Ta sklep predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki spadajo na področje iz točke G člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES.
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC.
Ta sklep predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki spadajo na področje iz točke G člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES.