natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, only personal data that is up to date and corresponds to the actual beneficial owners should be made available and the beneficiaries should be informed about their rights under the current Union legal data protection framework, as set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and the procedures applicable for exercising those rights.
Kadar bi poročanje FIU in pristojnih organov o neskladju ogrozilo tekočo preiskavo, bi morali FIU ali pristojni organi zadržati poročanje o neskladnosti do trenutka, ko razlogi, zaradi katerih ne poročajo, prenehajo obstajati.
In addition, to prevent the abuse of the information contained in the registers and to balance out the rights of beneficial owners, Member States might find it appropriate to consider making information relating to the requesting person along with the legal basis for their request available to the beneficial owner.
Poleg tega FIU in pristojni organi ne bi smeli poročati o kakršnem koli neskladju, kadar bi bilo to v nasprotju s katerimi koli določbami o zaupnosti v nacionalnem pravu ali bi pomenilo kaznivo dejanje razkritja informacij.
Where the reporting of discrepancies by the FIUs and competent authorities would jeopardise an on-going investigation, the FIUs or competent authorities should delay the reporting of the discrepancy until the moment at which the reasons for not reporting cease to exist.
Ta direktiva ne posega v varstvo osebnih podatkov, ki jih obdelujejo pristojni organi v skladu z Direktivo (EU) 2016/680.
Furthermore, FIUs and competent authorities should not report any discrepancy when this would be contrary to any confidentiality provision of national law or would constitute a tipping-off offence.
Dostop do informacij ter opredelitev upravičenega interesa bi moralo urejati pravo države članice, v kateri ima skrbnik sklada ali oseba z enakovrednim položajem v podobni pravni ureditvi sedež ali v kateri prebiva.
This Directive is without prejudice to the protection of personal data processed by competent authorities in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/680.
Kadar skrbnik sklada ali oseba z enakovrednim položajem v podobni pravni ureditvi nima sedeža ali ne prebiva v nobeni državi članici, bi moralo dostop do informacij in opredelitev upravičenega interesa urejati pravo države članice, v kateri so v skladu z določbami te direktive registrirane informacije o dejanskem lastništvu sklada ali podobne pravne ureditve.
Access to information and the definition of legitimate interest should be governed by the law of the Member State where the trustee of a trust or person holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement is established or resides.
Države članice bi morale v svojem nacionalnem pravu opredeliti upravičen interes kot splošni pojem in tudi kot merilo za ocenjevanje informacij o dejanskem lastništvu.
Where the trustee of the trust or person holding equivalent position in similar legal arrangement is not established or does not reside in any Member State, access to information and the definition of legitimate interest should be governed by the law of the Member State where the beneficial ownership information of the trust or similar legal arrangement is registered in accordance with the provisions of this Directive.
S temi opredelitvami zlasti ne bi smeli omejiti pojma upravičenega interesa na primere tekočih upravnih ali sodnih postopkov in bi morali omogočiti, da se po potrebi upošteva preventivno delo na področju preprečevanja pranja denarja, financiranja terorizma in s tem povezanih predhodnih kaznivih dejanj, ki ga opravljajo nevladne organizacije in raziskovalni novinarji.
Member States should define legitimate interest, both as a general concept and as a criterion for accessing beneficial ownership information in their national law.
Ko bodo registri dejanskega lastništva držav članic povezani, bi moral biti nacionalni in čezmejni dostop do registra vsake države članice odobren na podlagi opredelitve upravičenega interesa države članice, v kateri so v skladu z določbami te direktive registrirane informacije o dejanskem lastništvu sklada ali podobne pravne ureditve, in sicer na podlagi odločitve, ki jo sprejmejo ustrezni organi te države članice.
In particular, those definitions should not restrict the concept of legitimate interest to cases of pending administrative or legal proceedings, and should enable to take into account the preventive work in the field of anti-money laundering, counter terrorist financing and associate predicate offences undertaken by non-governmental organisations and investigative journalists, where appropriate.
Države članice bi morale imeti v zvezi s svojimi registri dejanskega lastništva tudi možnost vzpostaviti mehanizme za pritožbe zoper odločitve, s katerimi je odobren ali zavrnjen dostop do informacij o dejanskem lastništvu.
Once the interconnection of Member States’ beneficial ownership registers is in place, both national and cross-border access to each Member State’s register should be granted based on the definition of legitimate interest of the Member State where the information relating to the beneficial ownership of the trust or similar legal arrangement has been registered in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, by virtue of a decision taken by the relevant authorities of that Member State.
Da se zagotovita usklajena in učinkovita registracija in izmenjava informacij, bi morale države članice zagotoviti sodelovanje svojega organa, ki je zadolžen za register informacij o dejanskem lastništvu skladov in drugih podobnih pravnih ureditev, z ekvivalentnimi organi v drugih državah članicah, da bi se tako delile informacije o skladih in podobnih pravnih ureditvah, ki jih ureja pravo ene države članice in se upravljajo v drugi državi članici.
In relation to Member States’ beneficial ownership registers, it should also be possible for Member States to establish appeal mechanisms against decisions which grant or deny access to beneficial ownership information.
Za čezmejne korespondenčne odnose z respondenčnimi institucijami iz tretjih držav je značilno, da so stalni in se ponavljajo.
With a view to ensuring coherent and efficient registration and information exchange, Member States should ensure that their authority in charge of the register set up for the beneficial ownership information of trusts and similar legal arrangements cooperates with its counterparts in other Member States, sharing information concerning trusts and similar legal arrangements governed by the law of one Member State and administered in another Member State.
Zato bi morale države članice pri zahtevi za sprejetje ukrepov okrepljenega skrbnega preverjanja strank v tem posebnem kontekstu upoštevati, da korespondenčni odnosi ne vključujejo enkratnih transakcij ali same izmenjave zmogljivosti pošiljanja sporočil.
Cross-border correspondent relationships with a third-country’s respondent institution are characterised by their on-going, repetitive nature.
Poleg tega se lahko, ob priznavanju, da ne pomenijo vse čezmejne korespondenčne bančne storitve enake stopnje tveganja pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma, intenzivnost ukrepov iz te direktive določi z uporabo načel pristopa, ki temelji na tveganju, ter ne prejudicira stopnje tveganja pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma, ki ga predstavlja respondenčna finančna institucija.
Accordingly, Member States, while requiring the adoption of enhanced due diligence measures in this particular context, should take into consideration that correspondent relationships do not include one-off transactions or the mere exchange of messaging capabilities.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da pooblaščeni subjekti pravilno izvajajo pravila o preprečevanju pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma.
Moreover, recognising that not all cross-border correspondent banking services present the same level of money laundering and terrorist financing risks, the intensity of the measures laid down in this Directive can be determined by application of the principles of the risk based approach and do not prejudge the level of money laundering and terrorist financing risk presented by the respondent financial institution.
V tem pogledu bi morale države članice okrepiti vlogo javnih organov, ki delujejo v vlogi pristojnih organov z določenimi odgovornostmi za boj proti pranju denarja ali financiranju terorizma, vključno s FIU, organi, ki imajo funkcijo preiskovanja ali pregona pranja denarja, povezanih predhodnih kaznivih dejanj in financiranja terorizma, iskanja in zasega ali zamrznitve in zaplembe sredstev, pridobljenih s kaznivimi dejanji, organi, ki prejemajo poročila o čezmejnem prenosu valut in prenosljivih instrumentov, ki se glasijo na prinosnika, ter organi, ki imajo odgovornosti nadzora ali spremljanja za zagotovitev izpolnjevanja obveznosti pooblaščenih subjektov.
It is important to ensure that anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing rules are correctly implemented by obliged entities.
Države članice bi morale okrepiti vlogo drugih ustreznih organov, tudi organov za preprečevanje korupcije in davčnih organov.
In that context, Member States should strengthen the role of public authorities acting as competent authorities with designated responsibilities for combating money laundering or terrorist financing, including the FIUs, the authorities that have the function of investigating or prosecuting money laundering, associated predicate offences and terrorist financing, tracing and seizing or freezing and confiscating criminal assets, authorities receiving reports on cross-border transportation of currency and bearer-negotiable instruments and authorities that have supervisory or monitoring responsibilities aimed at ensuring compliance by obliged entities.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti učinkovit in nepristranski nadzor nad vsemi pooblaščenimi subjekti, po možnosti s strani javnih organov prek ločenega in neodvisnega nacionalnega regulatorja ali nadzornika.
Member States should strengthen the role of other relevant authorities including anti-corruption authorities and tax authorities.
Storilci kaznivih dejanj nezakonito premoženjsko korist prenašajo prek številnih finančnih posrednikov, da bi se izognili razkritju.
Member States should ensure effective and impartial supervision of all obliged entities, preferably by public authorities via a separate and independent national regulator or supervisor.
Zato je pomembno, da se kreditnim in finančnim institucijam omogoči izmenjavo informacij ne le med člani skupine, temveč tudi z drugimi kreditnimi in finančnimi institucijami, ob ustreznem upoštevanju pravil glede varstva podatkov, kot so določena v nacionalnem pravu.
Criminals move illicit proceeds through numerous financial intermediaries to avoid detection.
Pristojni organi, ki nadzorujejo, ali pooblaščeni subjekti ravnajo v skladu s to direktivo, bi morali imeti možnost sodelovati in izmenjevati zaupne informacije, ne glede na njihovo naravo ali status.
Therefore it is important to allow credit and financial institutions to exchange information not only between group members, but also with other credit and financial institutions, with due regard to data protection rules as set out in national law.
Zato bi morali taki pristojni organi imeti ustrezno pravno podlago za izmenjavo zaupnih informacij, sodelovanja med pristojnimi nadzornimi organi na področju AML/CFT ter bonitetnimi nadzorniki pa ne bi smela nenamerno ovirati pravna negotovost, ki jo lahko povzroči pomanjkanje jasnih določb na tem področju.
Competent authorities supervising obliged entities for compliance with this Directive should be able to cooperate and exchange confidential information, regardless of their respective nature or status.
Nadzor učinkovitega izvajanja politike AML/CFT v skupini bi moral potekati v skladu z načeli in načini konsolidiranega nadzora, kot so določeni v ustrezni evropski sektorski zakonodaji.
To this end, such competent authorities should have an adequate legal basis for exchange of confidential information, and collaboration between AML/CFT competent supervisory authorities and prudential supervisors should not be hampered unintentionally by legal uncertainty which may stem from a lack of explicit provisions in this field.
Izmenjava informacij in zagotavljanje pomoči med pristojnimi organi držav članic sta bistvena za namene te direktive.
The supervision of the effective implementation of group policy on AML/CFT should be done in accordance with the principles and modalities of consolidated supervision as laid down in the relevant European sectoral legislation.
Države članice zato ne bi smele prepovedati ali uvesti nerazumnih ali neupravičeno omejujočih pogojev za to izmenjavo informacij in zagotavljanje pomoči.
The exchange of information and the provision of assistance between competent authorities of the Members States is essential for the purposes of this Directive.
V skladu s Skupno politično izjavo z dne 28. septembra 2011 držav članic in Komisije o obrazložitvenih dokumentih se države članice zavezujejo, da bodo v upravičenih primerih uradnemu obvestilu o ukrepih za prenos priložile enega ali več dokumentov, v katerih se pojasni razmerje med elementi direktive in ustreznimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
Consequently, Member States should not prohibit or place unreasonable or unduly restrictive conditions on this exchange of information and provision of assistance.
Zakonodajalec meni, da je posredovanje takih dokumentov v primeru te direktive upravičeno.
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents, Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer varovanja finančnega sistema s preprečevanjem, odkrivanjem in preiskovanjem pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, saj bi bili lahko posamezni ukrepi, ki jih sprejmejo države članice za zavarovanje svojih finančnih sistemov, v neskladju z delovanjem notranjega trga ter predpisi pravne države in javnim redom Unije, temveč se zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepov cilj lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely the protection of the financial system by means of prevention, detection and investigation of money laundering and terrorist financing, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, as individual measures adopted by Member States to protect their financial systems could be inconsistent with the functioning of the internal market and with the prescriptions of the rule of law and Union public policy, but can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ta direktiva spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina), zlasti pravico do spoštovanja zasebnega in družinskega življenja (člen 7 Listine), pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov (člen 8 Listine) ter svobodo gospodarske pobude (člen 16 Listine).
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
Komisija bi morala pri pripravi poročila o oceni izvajanja te direktive skrbno upoštevati spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in načel, priznanih v Listini.
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), in particular the right to respect for private and family life (Article 7 of the Charter), the right to the protection of personal data (Article 8 of the Charter) and the freedom to conduct a business (Article 16 of the Charter).
V skladu s členom 28(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta je bilo opravljeno posvetovanje z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, ki je podal mnenje 2. februarja 2017.
Given the need to urgently implement measures adopted with a view to strengthen the Union’s regime set in place for the prevention of money laundering and financing of terrorism, and seeing the commitments undertaken by Member States to quickly proceed with the transposition of Directive (EU) 2015/849, the amendments to Directive (EU) 2015/849 should be transposed by 10 January 2020.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO DIREKTIVO:
Member States should set up beneficial ownership registers for corporate and other legal entities by 10 January 2020 and for trusts and similar legal arrangements by 10 March 2020.
Člen 1
Central registers should be interconnected via the European Central Platform by 10 March 2021.
Spremembe Direktive (EU) 2015/849
Member States should set up centralised automated mechanisms allowing the identification of holders of bank and payment accounts and safe-deposit boxes by 10 September 2020.
Direktiva (EU) 2015/849 se spremeni:
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and delivered an opinion on 2 February 2017.
v členu 2(1) se točka 3 spremeni:
Directive (EU) 2015/849 should therefore be amended accordingly,
točka (a) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
revizorje, zunanje računovodje in davčne svetovalce ter katero koli drugo osebo, ki se zaveže, da bo zagotovila bodisi neposredno bodisi prek drugih oseb, s katerimi je ta druga oseba povezana, materialno pomoč, pomoč ali svetovanje o davčnih zadevah kot glavno poslovno ali poklicno dejavnost;“;
Article 1
točka (d) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Amendments to Directive (EU) 2015/849
nepremičninske zastopnike, vključno ko delujejo kot posredniki pri dajanju nepremičnin v najem, vendar le v zvezi s transakcijami, za katere znaša mesečna najemnina 10000 EUR ali več;“;
Directive (EU) 2015/849 is amended as follows:
dodata se naslednji točki:
point (3) of Article 2(1) is amended as follows:
ponudnike, ki sodelujejo pri storitvah menjav med virtualnimi in fiat valutami;
point (a) is replaced by the following:
ponudnike skrbniških denarnic;
auditors, external accountants and tax advisors, and any other person that undertakes to provide, directly or by means of other persons to which that other person is related, material aid, assistance or advice on tax matters as principal business or professional activity;’;
osebe, ki trgujejo ali delujejo kot posredniki v trgovini z umetniškimi deli, vključno ko to izvajajo umetniške galerije in dražbene hiše, kadar vrednost transakcije ali vrste povezanih transakcij znaša 10000 EUR ali več;
point (d) is replaced by the following:
osebe, ki hranijo umetniška dela, trgujejo ali delujejo kot posredniki v trgovini z umetniškimi deli, ko to izvajajo prostocarinska območja, kadar vrednost transakcije ali vrste povezanih transakcij znaša 10000 EUR ali več.“;
estate agents including when acting as intermediaries in the letting of immovable property, but only in relation to transactions for which the monthly rent amounts to EUR 10000 or more;’;
člen 3 se spremeni:
the following points are added:
točka 4 se spremeni:
providers engaged in exchange services between virtual currencies and fiat currencies;
terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s teroristično skupino, in kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorističnimi dejavnostmi, kot so določena v naslovih II in III Direktive (EU) 2017/541;
custodian wallet providers;
točka (c) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
persons trading or acting as intermediaries in the trade of works of art, including when this is carried out by art galleries and auction houses, where the value of the transaction or a series of linked transactions amounts to EUR 10000 or more;
dejavnostih hudodelskih združb, kot so opredeljene v členu 1(1) Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/841/PNZ;
persons storing, trading or acting as intermediaries in the trade of works of art when this is carried out by free ports, where the value of the transaction or a series of linked transactions amounts to EUR 10000 or more.’;
v točki 6 se točka (b) nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 3 is amended as follows:
v primeru skladov vse naslednje osebe:
point (4) is amended as follows:
ustanovitelja oziroma ustanoviteljev;
terrorist offences, offences related to a terrorist group and offences related to terrorist activities as set out in Titles II and III of Directive (EU) 2017/541;
skrbnika oziroma skrbnikov;
point (c) is replaced by the following:
morebitnega zaščitnika oziroma zaščitnike;
the activities of criminal organisations as defined in Article 1(1) of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA;
upravičence ali, kadar je treba posameznike, ki so upravičenci pravne ureditve ali pravnega subjekta, še ugotoviti, kategorijo oseb, v interesu katerih je bila pravna ureditev ali pravni subjekt ustanovljen oziroma v interesu katerih deluje;
in point (6), point (b) is replaced by the following:
vsako drugo fizično osebo, ki izvršuje končni nadzor nad skladom prek neposrednega ali posrednega lastništva ali prek drugačnega nadzora;“;
in the case of trusts, all following persons:
točka 16 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
the settlor(s);
‚elektronski denar‘ pomeni elektronski denar, kot je opredeljen v točki 2 člena 2 Direktive 2009/110/ES, a izključuje pojem denarne vrednosti iz člena 1(4) in (5) navedene direktive;“;
the trustee(s);
‚virtualne valute‘ pomeni digitalno obliko vrednosti, ki je ne izda ali jamči zanjo niti centralna banka niti javni organ in ki ni nujno vezana na zakonito uvedeno valuto in je brez pravnega statusa valute ali denarja, ampak jo fizične ali pravne osebe sprejemajo kot sredstvo menjave, ki se lahko elektronsko prenaša, shranjuje in izmenjuje;“;
the protector(s), if any;
‚ponudnik skrbniških denarnic‘ pomeni subjekt, ki zagotavlja storitve varovanja zasebnih kriptografskih ključev v imenu svojih strank, za hranjenje, shranjevanje in prenos virtualnih valut.“;
the beneficiaries or where the individuals benefiting from the legal arrangement or entity have yet to be determined, the class of persons in whose main interest the legal arrangement or entity is set up or operates;
člen 6 se spremeni:
any other natural person exercising ultimate control over the trust by means of direct or indirect ownership or by other means;’;
v odstavku 2 se točki (b) in (c) nadomestita z naslednjim:
point (16) is replaced by the following:
tveganja, povezana z vsakim zadevnim sektorjem, vključno, kadar so na voljo, z ocenami količin opranega denarja, ki jih zagotovi Eurostat za vsakega od teh sektorjev;
“electronic money” means electronic money as defined in point (2) of Article 2 of Directive 2009/110/EC, but excluding monetary value as referred to in Article 1(4) and (5) of that Directive;’;
najbolj razširjene metode, ki jih uporabljajo storilci kaznivih dejanj za pranje nezakonito pridobljene premoženjske koristi, kadar so na voljo tudi tiste, ki se uporabljajo zlasti pri transakcijah med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, ne glede na opredelitev tretje države kot tretje države z visokim tveganjem na podlagi člena 9(2).“;
“virtual currencies” means a digital representation of value that is not issued or guaranteed by a central bank or a public authority, is not necessarily attached to a legally established currency and does not possess a legal status of currency or money, but is accepted by natural or legal persons as a means of exchange and which can be transferred, stored and traded electronically;
odstavek 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim: