natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Measures aimed at achieving general public interest objectives in the emerging audiovisual media services sector are more effective if they are taken with the active support of the service providers themselves.
Ukrepi za doseganje ciljev splošnega javnega interesa na področju novo nastajajočih avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev so učinkovitejši, če se sprejmejo z aktivno podporo samih ponudnikov storitev.
Self-regulation constitutes a type of voluntary initiative which enables economic operators, social partners, non-governmental organisations and associations to adopt common guidelines amongst themselves and for themselves.
Samoregulacija predstavlja obliko prostovoljne pobude, ki gospodarskim subjektom, socialnim partnerjem, nevladnim organizacijam in združenjem omogoča, da med seboj in zase sprejmejo splošne smernice.
They are responsible for developing, monitoring and enforcing compliance with those guidelines.
Odgovorni so za razvoj teh smernic ter za spremljanje in izvrševanje skladnosti s temi smernicami.
Member States should, in accordance with their different legal traditions, recognise the role which effective self-regulation can play as a complement to the legislative, judicial and administrative mechanisms in place and its useful contribution to the achievement of the objectives of Directive 2010/13/EU.
Države članice bi morale v skladu s svojimi različnimi pravnimi tradicijami priznati vlogo, ki jo lahko ima učinkovita samoregulacija kot dodatek obstoječim zakonodajnim, sodnim in upravnim mehanizmom, ter njegov koristen prispevek k doseganju ciljev Direktive 2010/13/EU.
However, while self-regulation might be a complementary method of implementing certain provisions of Directive 2010/13/EU, it should not constitute a substitute for the obligations of the national legislator.
Vendar je samoregulacija lahko le dodaten način za izvajanje nekaterih določb Direktive 2010/13/EU in ne bi smela nadomestiti obveznosti nacionalnega zakonodajalca.
Co-regulation provides, in its minimal form, a legal link between self-regulation and the national legislator in accordance with the legal traditions of the Member States.
Koregulacija v svoji minimalni obliki predstavlja pravno povezavo med samoregulacijo in nacionalnim zakonodajalcem v skladu s pravnimi tradicijami držav članic.
In co-regulation, the regulatory role is shared between stakeholders and the government or the national regulatory authorities or bodies.
Pri koregulaciji je vloga regulacije razdeljena med deležniki in vlado ali nacionalnimi regulatornimi organi ali telesi.
The role of the relevant public authorities includes recognition of the co-regulatory scheme, auditing of its processes and funding of the scheme.
Vloga ustreznih javnih organov vključuje priznavanje sheme koregulacije, revizijo njenih postopkov in njeno financiranje.
Co-regulation should allow for the possibility of state intervention in the event of its objectives not being met.
Koregulacija bi morala še naprej dopuščati možnost posredovanja države, če njeni cilji ne bi bili izpolnjeni.
Without prejudice to the formal obligations of the Member States regarding transposition, Directive 2010/13/EU encourages the use of self- and co-regulation.
Brez poseganja v formalne obveznosti držav članic v zvezi s prenosom Direktiva 2010/13/EU spodbuja uporabo samoregulacije in koregulacije.
This should neither oblige Member States to set up self- or co-regulation regimes, or both, nor disrupt or jeopardise current co-regulation initiatives which are already in place in Member States and which are functioning effectively.
To ne bi smelo niti obvezovati držav članic k vzpostavitvi ureditev samoregulacije ali koregulacije ali obeh niti posegati v sedanje pobude koregulacije, ki so že prisotne v državah članicah in učinkovito delujejo, ali jih ogrožati.
Transparency of media ownership is directly linked to the freedom of expression, a cornerstone of democratic systems.
Preglednost lastništva nad mediji je neposredno povezana s svobodo izražanja, ki je temeljni kamen demokratičnih sistemov.
Information concerning the ownership structure of media service providers, where such ownership results in the control of, or the exercise of a significant influence over, the content of the services provided, allows users to make an informed judgement about such content.
Kadar lastniška struktura ponudnika medijskih storitev privede do nadziranja vsebin ponujenih storitev ali do znatnega vplivanja na te vsebine, informacije o lastniški strukturi ponudnika medijskih storitev uporabnikom omogočajo, da ozaveščeno presojajo o taki vsebini.
Member States should be able to determine whether and to what extent information about the ownership structure of a media service provider should be accessible to users, provided that the essence of the fundamental rights and freedoms concerned is respected and that such measures are necessary and proportionate.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da določijo, ali in v kakšnem obsegu bi morale biti informacije o lastniški strukturi ponudnika medijskih storitev dostopne uporabnikom, če pri tem spoštujejo bistvo zadevnih temeljnih pravic in svoboščin ter če so taki ukrepi potrebni in sorazmerni.
Because of the specific nature of audiovisual media services, especially the impact of those services on the way people form opinions, users have a legitimate interest in knowing who is responsible for the content of those services.
Zaradi posebne narave avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, zlasti vpliva teh storitev na to, kako si ljudje oblikujejo mnenje, je v legitimnem interesu uporabnikov, da vedo, kdo je odgovoren za vsebino teh storitev.
In order to strengthen freedom of expression, and, by extension, to promote media pluralism and avoid conflicts of interest, it is important for Member States to ensure that users have easy and direct access at any time to information about media service providers.
Da bi okrepili svobodo izražanja in posledično promovirali pluralnost medijev ter da ne bi prihajalo do nasprotja interesov, je pomembno, da države članice zagotovijo, da imajo uporabniki stalen, enostaven in neposreden dostop do informacij o ponudniku medijskih storitev.
It is for each Member State to decide, in particular with respect to the information which may be provided on ownership structure and beneficial owners.
Vsaka država članica sprejme zadevno odločitev, zlasti kar zadeva informacije, ki se lahko zagotovijo o lastniški strukturi in dejanskih lastnikih.
In order to ensure coherence and legal certainty for businesses and Member States' authorities, the notion of ‘incitement to violence or hatred’ should, to the appropriate extent, be understood within the meaning of Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA.
Za zagotovitev usklajenosti in pravne varnosti za podjetja in organe držav članic bi bilo treba pojem „spodbujanje nasilja ali sovraštva“ v ustreznem obsegu razumeti v smislu iz Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/913/PNZ.
Considering the evolution of the means by which content is disseminated via electronic communications networks, it is important to protect the general public from incitement to terrorism.
Glede na razvoj sredstev, s katerimi se vsebina razširja preko elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, je pomembno, da se splošna javnost zaščiti pred spodbujanjem terorizma.
Directive 2010/13/EU should therefore ensure that audiovisual media services do not contain public provocation to commit a terrorist offence.
Direktiva 2010/13/EU bi zato morala zagotoviti, da avdiovizualne medijske storitve ne vsebujejo javnega ščuvanja k storitvi terorističnega kaznivega dejanja.
In order to ensure coherence and legal certainty for businesses and Member States' authorities, the notion of ‘public provocation to commit a terrorist offence’ should be understood within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Za zagotovitev usklajenosti in pravne varnosti za podjetja in organe držav članic bi bilo treba pojem „javno ščuvanje k storitvi terorističnega kaznivega dejanja“ razumeti v smislu iz Direktive (EU) 2017/541 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
In order to empower viewers, including parents and minors, to make informed decisions about the content to be watched, it is necessary that media service providers provide sufficient information about content that may impair minors' physical, mental or moral development.
Da se gledalcem, vključno s starši in mladoletniki, omogoči ozaveščeno odločanje o vsebini, ki jo želijo gledati, bi morali ponudniki medijskih storitev zagotoviti dovolj informacij o vsebini, ki bi lahko ogrozila telesni, duševni ali moralni razvoj mladoletnikov.
That could be done, for example, through a system of content descriptors, an acoustic warning, a visual symbol or any other means, describing the nature of the content.
To bi se lahko na primer izvedlo s sistemom deskriptorjev vsebine, zvočnim opozorilom, vizualnim simbolom ali na kateri koli drug način, s katerim bi opisali naravo vsebine.
The appropriate measures for the protection of minors applicable to television broadcasting services should also apply to on-demand audiovisual media services.
Ustrezne ukrepe za varstvo mladoletnikov, ki se uporabljajo za storitve razširjanja televizijskih programov, bi bilo treba uporabljati tudi za avdiovizualne medijske storitve na zahtevo.
That should increase the level of protection.
To bi moralo izboljšati raven varstva.
The minimum harmonisation approach allows Member States to develop a higher degree of protection for content which may impair the physical, mental or moral development of minors.
Pristop minimalne harmonizacije dopušča državam članicam, da razvijejo višjo raven varstva za vsebine, ki bi lahko škodile telesnemu, duševnemu ali moralnemu razvoju mladoletnikov.
The most harmful content, which may impair the physical, mental or moral development of minors, but is not necessarily a criminal offence, should be subject to the strictest measures such as encryption and effective parental controls, without prejudice to the adoption of stricter measures by Member States.
Za najbolj škodljive vsebine, ki bi lahko škodile telesnemu, duševnemu ali moralnemu razvoju mladoletnikov, vendar niso nujno kaznivo dejanje, bi morali veljati najstrožji ukrepi, kot so šifriranje in učinkovita orodja za starševski nadzor, brez poseganja v možnost držav članic, da sprejmejo strožje ukrepe.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and the Council recognises that children merit specific protection with regard to the processing of their personal data.
V Uredbi (EU) 2016/679 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta je priznano, da otroci potrebujejo posebno varstvo pri obdelavi njihovih osebnih podatkov.
The establishment of child protection mechanisms by media service providers inevitably leads to the processing of the personal data of minors.
Vzpostavitev mehanizmov za varstvo otrok s strani ponudnikov medijskih storitev neizogibno vodi k obdelavi osebnih podatkov mladoletnikov.
Given that such mechanisms aim at protecting children, personal data of minors processed in the framework of technical child protection measures should not be used for commercial purposes.
Glede na to, da so tovrstni mehanizmi namenjeni varstvu otrok, se osebni podatki mladoletnikov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru tehničnih ukrepov za varstvo otrok, ne bi smeli uporabljati v tržne namene.
Ensuring the accessibility of audiovisual content is an essential requirement in the context of the commitments taken under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Zagotavljanje dostopnosti avdiovizualne vsebine je bistvena zahteva v okviru zavez, sprejetih na podlagi Konvencije Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov.
In the context of Directive 2010/13/EU, the term ‘persons with disabilities’ should be interpreted in light of the nature of the services covered by that Directive, which are audiovisual media services.
V Direktivi 2010/13/EU bi bilo treba izraz „invalidne osebe“ razlagati ob upoštevanju vrste storitev, zajetih v navedeni direktivi, ki so avdiovizualne medijske storitve.
The right of persons with an impairment and of the elderly to participate and be integrated in the social and cultural life of the Union is linked to the provision of accessible audiovisual media services.
Pravica invalidnih in starejših oseb do udeležbe v družbenem in kulturnem življenju Unije ter vključevanja vanj je povezana z zagotavljanjem dostopnih avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev.
Therefore, Member States should, without undue delay, ensure that media service providers under their jurisdiction actively seek to make content accessible to persons with disabilities, in particular with a visual or hearing impairment.
Države članice bi morale zato brez nepotrebnega odlašanja zagotoviti, da si ponudniki medijskih storitev pod njihovo pristojnostjo dejavno prizadevajo, da bi bila vsebina dostopna invalidnim osebam, zlasti osebam z okvaro vida ali sluha.
Accessibility requirements should be met through a progressive and continuous process, while taking into account the practical and unavoidable constraints that could prevent full accessibility, such as programmes or events broadcast in real time.
Zahteve glede dostopnosti bi bilo treba izpolnjevati v okviru postopnega in neprekinjenega procesa, ob upoštevanju praktičnih in neizogibnih omejitev, ki bi lahko preprečile polno dostopnost, kot so programi ali dogodki, ki se predvajajo v realnem času.
In order to measure the progress that media service providers have made in making their services progressively accessible to people with visual or hearing disabilities, Member States should require media service providers established on their territory to report to them on a regular basis.
Da bi države članice lahko izmerile napredek ponudnikov medijskih storitev pri postopnem zagotavljanju dostopnosti svojih storitev za osebe z okvaro vida ali sluha, bi morale od ponudnikov medijskih storitev s sedežem na njihovem ozemlju zahtevati, da jim redno poročajo.
The means to achieve the accessibility of audiovisual media services under Directive 2010/13/EU should include, but need not be limited to, sign language, subtitling for the deaf and hard of hearing, spoken subtitles, and audio description.
Načini zagotavljanja dostopnosti avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev na podlagi Direktive 2010/13/EU bi morali med drugim vključevati znakovni jezik, podnaslavljanje za gluhe osebe in druge osebe z okvaro sluha, govorjene podnapise in zvočne opise.
However, that Directive does not cover features or services providing access to audiovisual media services, nor does it cover accessibility features of electronic programme guides (EPGs).
Vendar navedena direktiva ne zajema elementov ali storitev, ki omogočajo dostop do avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, ali elementov elektronskih programskih vodnikov, s katerimi se zagotavlja dostopnost.
Therefore, that Directive is without prejudice to Union law aiming to harmonise the accessibility of services providing access to audiovisual media services, such as websites, online applications and EPGs, or the provision of information on accessibility and in accessible formats.
Zato navedena direktiva ne posega v pravo Unije, katerega namen je harmonizirati dostopnost storitev za zagotavljanje dostopa do avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, kot so spletna mesta, spletne aplikacije in elektronski programski vodniki, ali zagotavljanje informacij o dostopnosti in v dostopnih formatih.
In some cases, it might not be possible to provide emergency information in a manner that is accessible to persons with disabilities.
V nekaterih primerih morda ni mogoče zagotoviti nujnih informacij tako, da bi bile dostopne za invalidne osebe.
However, such exceptional cases should not prevent emergency information from being made public through audiovisual media services.
Vendar takšni izjemni primeri ne bi smeli preprečevati, da bi bile nujne informacije objavljene preko avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev.
Directive 2010/13/EU is without prejudice to the ability of Member States to impose obligations to ensure the appropriate prominence of content of general interest under defined general interest objectives such as media pluralism, freedom of speech and cultural diversity.
Direktiva 2010/13/EU ne posega v možnost držav članic, da naložijo obveznosti za zagotavljanje, da je vsebina, ki je v splošnem interesu, ustrezno postavljena v ospredje v okviru opredeljenih ciljev glede splošnih interesov, kot so pluralnost medijev, svoboda govora in kulturna raznolikost.
Such obligations should only be imposed where they are necessary to meet general interest objectives clearly defined by Member States in accordance with Union law.
Takšne obveznosti bi bilo treba naložiti samo, kadar so potrebne za izpolnitev ciljev splošnega interesa, ki jih države članice jasno opredelijo v skladu s pravom Unije.
Where Member States decide to impose rules on appropriate prominence, they should only impose proportionate obligations on undertakings in the interests of legitimate public policy considerations.
Kadar se države članice odločijo, da bodo določile pravila o postavljanju v ospredje, bi morale podjetjem naložiti samo sorazmerne obveznosti, in sicer v interesu legitimnih vidikov javnega reda.
In order to protect the editorial responsibility of media service providers and the audiovisual value chain, it is essential to be able to guarantee the integrity of programmes and audiovisual media services supplied by media service providers.
Za zaščito uredniške odgovornosti ponudnikov medijskih storitev in avdiovizualne vrednostne verige je bistveno zagotoviti celovitost programov in avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, ki jih zagotavljajo ponudniki medijskih storitev.
Programmes and audiovisual media services should not be transmitted in a shortened form, altered or interrupted, or overlaid for commercial purposes, without the explicit consent of the media service provider.
Programe in avdiovizualne medijske storitve se ne bi smelo prenašati v skrajšani obliki, jih spremeniti ali prekiniti ali prekrivati v komercialne namene brez izrecnega soglasja ponudnika medijskih storitev.
Member States should ensure that overlays solely initiated or authorised by the recipient of the service for private use, such as overlays resulting from services for individual communications, do not require the consent of the media service provider.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da za prekrivanja, ki jih prejemnik storitve sproži ali dovoli le za zasebno uporabo, kot so prekrivanja, izhajajoča iz storitev za posamezna sporočila, ni potrebno soglasje ponudnika medijskih storitev.
Control elements of any user interface necessary for the operation of the device or programme navigation, such as volume bars, search functions, navigation menus or lists of channels, should not be covered.
Kontrolni elementi kakršnih koli uporabniških vmesnikov, potrebnih za delovanje naprav ali navigacijo programov, kot so drsniki glasnosti, funkcije iskanja, navigacijski meniji ali seznami kanalov, ne bi smeli biti zajeti.
Legitimate overlays, such as warning information, general public interest information, subtitles or commercial communications overlays provided by the media service provider, should also not be covered.
Prav tako ne bi smela biti zajeta legitimna prekrivanja, kot so opozorilne informacije, informacije v splošnem javnem interesu, podnaslovi ali prekrivanja v zvezi s komercialnimi sporočili, ki jih zagotavlja ponudnik medijskih storitev.
Without prejudice to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council, data compression techniques which reduce the size of a data file and other techniques to adapt a service to the distribution means, such as resolution and coding, without any modification of the content, should not be covered either.
Brez poseganja v člen 3(3) Uredbe (EU) 2015/2120 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta tudi ne bi smele biti zajete tehnike stiskanja podatkov, s katerimi se velikost datoteke zmanjša, in druge tehnike za prilagoditev storitve načinom razširjanja, kot sta ločljivost in kodiranje, brez kakršne koli spremembe vsebine.
Measures to protect the integrity of programmes and audiovisual media services should be imposed where they are necessary to meet general interest objectives clearly defined by Member States in accordance with Union law.
Ukrepe za zaščito celovitosti programov in avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev bi bilo treba uvesti, če so potrebni za izpolnitev ciljev splošnega interesa, ki jih države članice jasno opredelijo v skladu s pravom Unije.
Such measures should impose proportionate obligations on undertakings in the interest of legitimate public policy considerations.
S takimi ukrepi bi bilo treba podjetjem naložiti sorazmerne obveznosti, in sicer v interesu legitimnih vidikov javnega reda.
With the exception of sponsorship and product placement, audiovisual commercial communications for alcoholic beverages in on-demand audiovisual media services should comply with the criteria applicable to television advertising and teleshopping for alcoholic beverages laid down in Directive 2010/13/EU.
Z izjemo sponzorstev in promocijskega umeščanja izdelkov, bi morala za avdiovizualna komercialna sporočila za alkoholne pijače v okviru avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev na zahtevo veljati merila, ki se uporabljajo za televizijsko oglaševanje in televizijsko prodajo alkoholnih pijač, kot je določeno v Direktivi 2010/13/EU.
The more detailed criteria applicable to television advertising and teleshopping for alcoholic beverages are limited to spot advertising, which is by its nature separated from the programme, and therefore excludes other commercial communications which are linked to the programme or are an integral part of the programme, such as sponsorship and product placement.
Podrobnejša merila, ki se uporabljajo za televizijsko oglaševanje in televizijsko prodajo alkoholnih pijač, so omejena na oglaševalske vložke, ki so ločeni od programa, in zato izključujejo druga komercialna sporočila, ki so povezana s programom ali so del programa, kot so sponzorstva in promocijsko umeščanje izdelkov.
Consequently, those criteria should not apply to sponsorship and product placement in on-demand audiovisual media services.
Zato se ta merila ne bi smela uporabljati za sponzorstva in promocijsko umeščanje izdelkov pri avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah na zahtevo.
Certain widely recognised nutritional guidelines exist at national and international level, such as the World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe's nutrient profile model, in order to differentiate foods on the basis of their nutritional composition in the context of television advertising of foods to children.
Na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni obstajajo določene splošno priznane prehranske smernice, kot je model prehranskega profila regionalnega urada Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije za Evropo, in sicer za razlikovanje hrane na podlagi njene hranilne sestave v okviru televizijskega oglaševanja hrane otrokom.
Member States should be encouraged to ensure that self- and co-regulation, including through codes of conduct, is used to effectively reduce the exposure of children to audiovisual commercial communications regarding foods and beverages that are high in salt, sugars, fat, saturated fats or trans-fatty acids or that otherwise do not fit those national or international nutritional guidelines.
Države članice bi bilo treba spodbujati k zagotavljanju, da se samoregulacija in koregulacija, vključno s pravili ravnanja, uporabljata za učinkovito zmanjšanje izpostavljenosti otrok avdiovizualnim komercialnim sporočilom o hrani in pijači, ki imata visoko vsebnost soli, sladkorja, maščob, nasičenih maščob ali transmaščobnih kislin ali ki drugače ne ustrezata navedenim nacionalnim ali mednarodnim prehranskim smernicam.