natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By its judgement of 26 January 2017, the General Court annulled Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/902 on the grounds that the Decision was not based on a clear demonstration of an infringement of the essential health and safety requirements set out in Directive 2006/42/EC but on the mere non-conformity of the lawnmower with harmonised standard EN 60335-2-77:2010 while harmonised standard EN 60335-2-77:2006 still conferred on it a presumption of conformity with those requirements during the period concerned (i.e. from 3 September 2012 until 31 August 2013).
Komisija je z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije (EU) 2015/902 ugotovila, da je ukrep, ki ga je sprejela Latvija, upravičen.
In order to fulfil the obligation laid down in Article 266 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Commission is required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the General Court.
Splošno sodišče je s sodbo z dne 26. januarja 2017 Izvedbeni sklep (EU) 2015/902 razveljavilo z utemeljitvijo, da sklep ne temelji na jasni ugotovitvi kršitve bistvenih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev iz Direktive 2006/42/ES, ampak samo na neskladju s harmoniziranim standardom EN 60335-2-77:2010, medtem ko ji je harmonizirani standard EN 60335-2-77:2006 v zadevnem obdobju še vedno zagotavljal domnevno skladnost z navedenimi zahtevami (tj. od 3. septembra 2012 do 31. avgusta 2013).
To that end, the Commission consulted the concerned parties.
Da bi izpolnila obveznost iz člena 266 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, mora Komisija sprejeti ukrepe, potrebne za izvršitev sodbe Splošnega sodišča.
The manufacturer confirmed that the lawnmower has not been manufactured or placed on the market in any EU Member State since 1 September 2013.
V ta namen se je Komisija posvetovala z zadevnimi stranmi.
The manufacturer confirmed that the lawnmower has been withdrawn from dealers and distributors in Latvia at the beginning of 2014 and provided information claiming that harmonised standard EN 60335-2-77:2006 was correctly applied.
Proizvajalec je potrdil, da vrtna kosilnica ni bila proizvedena ali dana na trg v kateri koli državi članici EU od 1. septembra 2013.
Latvia provided information indicating that its national measure was still in place.
Potrdil je tudi, da je bila vrtna kosilnica na začetku leta 2014 umaknjena iz prodaje in distribucije v Latviji ter je zagotovil informacije o pravilni uporabi harmoniziranega standarda EN 60335-2-77:2006.
It also confirmed that this measure was based on the application of harmonised standard EN 60335-2-77:2010 and assessment under that harmonised standard only.
Latvija je predložila informacije, iz katerih je razvidno, da je bil njen nacionalni ukrep še vedno v veljavi.
The additional information provided by Latvia was not sufficient to demonstrate an incorrect application of harmonised standard EN 60335-2-77:2006.
Potrdila je tudi, da je ta ukrep temeljil zgolj na uporabi harmoniziranega standarda EN 60335-2-77:2010 in oceni na podlagi navedenega harmoniziranega standarda.
In the light of all the information available, and noting, in particular, that the Latvian measure was based on the assessment of conformity with the harmonised standard EN 60335-2-77:2010, while it follows from the judgement of the General Court of 26 January 2017 that harmonised standard EN 60335-2-77:2006 applied to the product during the period concerned, the national measure cannot be considered justified,
Dodatne informacije, ki jih je predložila Latvija, niso zadostovale za dokaz o nepravilni uporabi harmoniziranega standarda EN 60335-2-77:2006.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Glede na vse razpoložljive informacije in zlasti ob upoštevanju, da je latvijski ukrep temeljil na oceni skladnosti s harmoniziranim standardom EN 60335-2-77:2010, iz sodbe Splošnega sodišča z dne 26. januarja 2017 pa izhaja, da se je za proizvod v zadevnem obdobju uporabljal harmonizirani standard EN 60335-2-77:2006, se državni ukrep ne more šteti za upravičenega –
The measure taken by Latvia to prohibit the placing on the market of lawnmower of type Stiga Collector 35 EL (C 350, 297352654/S13) manufactured by GGP Italy SpA, via del Lavoro 6, 31033 Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
Člen 1
, is not justified.
Ukrep Latvije, ki prepoveduje dajanje na trg vrtne kosilnice Stiga Collector 35 EL (C350, 297352654/S13) proizvajalca GGP Italy SpA, via del Lavoro 6, 31033 Castelfranco Veneto, Italija
Article 2
, ni upravičen.
Done at Brussels, 3 December 2018.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice.
For the Commission
V Bruslju, 3. decembra 2018
OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24.
Članica Komisije
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/902 of 10 June 2015 on a measure taken by Latvia in accordance with Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to prohibit the placing on the market of a lawnmower manufactured by GGP Italy SpA (OJ L 147, 12.6.2015, p. 22).
UL L 157, 9.6.2006, str. 24.
Case T-474/15, Global Garden Products Italy SpA (GGP Italy) v European Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2017:36.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/902 z dne 10. junija 2015 o ukrepu prepovedi dajanja v promet kosilnice proizvajalca GGP Italy SpA, ki ga je sprejela Latvija v skladu z Direktivo 2006/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 147, 12.6.2015, str. 22).
ECLI:EU:T:2017:36, paragraphs 70 and71.
Zadeva T-474/15, Global Garden Products Italy SpA (GGP Italy) proti Evropski komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2017:36.
Council Decision (EU) 2018/1893
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2018/1893
regarding the signature, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part
o podpisu, v imenu Evropske unije, sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko o spremembi protokolov št. 1 in št. 4 k Evro-mediteranskemu pridružitvenemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kraljevino Maroko na drugi strani
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 207(4) v povezavi s členom 218(5) Pogodbe,
The Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part (‘the Association Agreement’) entered into force on 1 March 2000.
Evro-mediteranski pridružitveni sporazum med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kraljevino Maroko na drugi strani (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pridružitveni sporazum) je začel veljati 1. marca 2000.
Since the Association Agreement entered into force, the Union has continued to strengthen its bilateral relations with the Kingdom of Morocco and awarded it advanced status.
Odkar je začel veljati pridružitveni sporazum, je Unija še naprej krepila dvostranske odnose s Kraljevino Maroko in ji dodelila prednostni status.
The Union does not prejudge the outcome of the United Nations' political process on the final status of Western Sahara and has consistently reaffirmed its commitment to resolving the dispute in Western Sahara, presently listed by the United Nations as a non-self-governing territory, large parts of which are currently administered by the Kingdom of Morocco.
Unija ne prejudicira rezultata političnega procesa o končnem statusu Zahodne Sahare, ki se odvija pod okriljem Združenih narodov, ter vedno znova potrjuje svojo zavezanost reševanju spora v Zahodni Sahari, ki je trenutno vpisana na seznam ozemelj brez samouprave, katerega večji del je zdaj pod upravo Kraljevine Maroko.
It fully supports the efforts made by the United Nations Secretary-General and his personal envoy to help the parties reach a fair, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution that would ensure the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara under agreements aligned with the principles and objectives enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in the Resolutions of the UN Security Council, in particular Resolutions 2152 (2014), 2218 (2015), 2385 (2016); 2351 (2017) and 2414 (2018).
V celoti podpira prizadevanja generalnega sekretarja Združenih narodov in njegovega osebnega odposlanca, da bi stranema pomagali doseči pravično, trajno in za obe strani sprejemljivo politično rešitev, ki bi omogočala samoodločbo ljudstva Zahodne Sahare v okviru ureditev, skladnih s cilji in načeli iz Listine Združenih narodov, kot so zapisani v resolucijah Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov, zlasti v resolucijah 2152 (2014), 2218 (2015), 2385 (2016), 2351 (2017) in 2414 (2018).
Since the Association Agreement came into force, products from Western Sahara certified to be of Moroccan origin have been imported to the Union, benefiting from the tariff preferences laid down in its relevant provisions.
Odkar je začel veljati pridružitveni sporazum, so se proizvodi iz Zahodne Sahare s potrjenim maroškim poreklom uvažali v Unijo na podlagi tarifnih preferencialov, določenih z upoštevnimi določbami navedenega sporazuma.
However, in its judgment in Case C-104/16 P, the Court of Justice specified that the Association Agreement covered the territory of the Kingdom of Morocco alone and not Western Sahara, which is a non-self-governing territory.
Vendar je Sodišče v sodbi, ki jo je izdalo v zadevi C-104/16 P, določilo, da pridružitveni sporazum velja le za ozemlje Kraljevine Maroko, ne pa tudi Zahodne Sahare, ki je nesamoupravno ozemlje.
It should be ensured that the trade flows developed over the years are not disrupted, while establishing appropriate guarantees for the protection of international law, including human rights, and sustainable development in the territories concerned.
Pomembno je poskrbeti, da trgovinski tokovi, ki so se razvili skozi leta, ne bodo moteni, ter hkrati določiti ustrezna jamstva za varstvo mednarodnega prava, vključno s človekovimi pravicami, in trajnostni razvoj zadevnih ozemelj.
On 29 May 2017, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the Kingdom of Morocco with a view to establishing, in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Justice, a legal basis to grant the tariff preferences laid down in the Association Agreement to products originating in Western Sahara.
Svet je 29. maja 2017 Komisijo pooblastil za začetek pogajanj s Kraljevino Maroko, da v skladu s sodbo Sodišča določi pravno podlago za odobritev tarifnih preferencialov, ki so s pridružitvenim sporazumom predvideni za proizvode s poreklom iz Zahodne Sahare.
An agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco is the only means of ensuring that the import of products originating in Western Sahara benefits from preferential origin, given that only the Moroccan authorities are able to ensure compliance with the rules necessary for the granting of such preferences.
Sporazum med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko je edini način za zagotovitev, da je uvoz proizvodov s poreklom iz Zahodne Sahare upravičen do preferencialnega porekla, saj lahko le maroški organi zagotovijo spoštovanje pravil za odobritev takih preferencialov.
The Commission assessed the potential consequences of such an Agreement for sustainable development, particularly with regard to the advantages and disadvantages for the people concerned arising from the tariff preferences given to products from Western Sahara and the exploitation of the natural resources of the territories in question.
Komisija je ocenila morebitne posledice takega sporazuma za trajnostni razvoj, zlasti z vidika prednosti in slabosti, ki jih tarifni preferenciali, odobreni za proizvode iz Zahodne Sahare, prinašajo za zadevno prebivalstvo, ter njihovih učinkov na izkoriščanje naravnih virov na zadevnih ozemljih.
The effects of tariff benefits on employment, human rights and the exploitation of natural resources are very difficult to measure as they are by nature indirect.
Učinke tarifnih ugodnosti na zaposlovanje, človekove pravice in izkoriščanje naravnih virov je zelo težko izmeriti, saj so posredni.
Moreover, it is not easy to obtain objective information on this issue.
Prav tako ni lahko pridobiti objektivnih informacij v zvezi s tem.
Nonetheless, the assessment indicates that, overall, the advantages for the economy of Western Sahara arising from the granting of the tariff preferences laid down in the Association Agreement to products originating in Western Sahara, such as the powerful leverage effect it represents for economic growth and thus social development, outweigh the disadvantages raised in the consultation process, such as the extensive use of natural resources, especially underground water reserves, for which measures have been taken.
Kljub temu iz te ocene izhaja, da koristi za gospodarstvo Zahodne Sahare, ki jih prinaša odobritev tarifnih preferencialov, določenih v pridružitvenem sporazumu za proizvode s poreklom iz Zahodne Sahare, ter zlasti močan gospodarski vzvod in torej družbeni razvoj, ki ga to prinaša, na splošno presegajo slabosti, omenjene v postopku pogajanj, med katerimi so obsežno izkoriščanje naravnih virov, zlasti zalog podzemne vode, za katero so bili sprejeti ukrepi.
It has been assessed that the extension of tariff preferences to products originating in Western Sahara will have a positive overall effect for the people concerned.
Ocenjeno je bilo, da bo imela razširitev tarifnih preferencialov na proizvode s poreklom iz Zahodne Sahare na splošno pozitiven učinek za zadevno prebivalstvo.
It can be expected that this effect should continue and may even be enhanced in the future.
Pričakuje se, da se bo ta učinek v prihodnosti ohranil ali po možnosti še okrepil.
The assessment indicates that extending the benefit of tariff preferences to Western Saharan products will promote the conditions for investment and foster substantial and rapid growth favourable to local jobs.
Ocena kaže, da je mogoče z razširitvijo tarifnih preferencialov na proizvode iz Zahodne Sahare spodbuditi pogoje za naložbe ter spodbuditi njegov hiter in pomemben razcvet, ki bi ugodno vplival na lokalno zaposlovanje.
The existence in Western Sahara of economic and production activities that would benefit greatly from the tariff preferences laid down in the Association Agreement shows that failure to grant tariff preferences would significantly jeopardise exports from Western Sahara, especially those of fishery and agricultural products.
Obstoj gospodarskih dejavnosti in proizvodnje v Zahodni Sahari, ki bi imele največje koristi od tarifnih preferencialov, določenih v pridružitvenem sporazumu, kaže, da bi neodobritev tarifnih preferencialov pomembno škodovala izvozu iz Zahodne Sahare, zlasti izvozu ribiških in kmetijskih proizvodov.
It is assessed that by stimulating investment, the granting of tariff preferences should have a positive impact on the development of Western Sahara's economy.
Ocenjuje se, da bo odobritev tarifnih preferencialov pozitivno vplivala na gospodarski razvoj Zahodne Sahare, saj naj bi spodbudila naložbe.
Having regard to the considerations on consent in the ruling of the Court of Justice, the Commission, in liaison with the European External Action Service, has taken all reasonable and feasible steps in the current context to adequately involve the people concerned in order to ascertain their consent to the agreement.
Ob upoštevanju uvodnih izjav o privolitvi v sodbi Sodišča je Komisija v sodelovanju z Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje izvedla vse razumne in možne ukrepe v dani situaciji, da je bilo ustrezno vključeno zadevno prebivalstvo, da se zagotovi njegova privolitev.
Wide-ranging consultations were conducted and the majority of the social, economic and political stakeholders who participated in the consultations stated that they were in favour of extending the tariff preferences in the Association Agreement to Western Sahara.
Izvedena so bila široka posvetovanja in večina socialnih, ekonomskih in političnih deležnikov, ki so sodelovali v posvetovanjih, je izrazila naklonjenost razširitvi tarifnih preferencialov iz pridružitvenega sporazuma na Zahodno Saharo.
Those who rejected the idea felt essentially that such an Agreement should affirm Morocco's position on Western Sahara.
Tisti, ki so razširitvi nasprotovali, so v bistvu menili, da bi se s takim sporazumom utrdil položaj Maroka na ozemlju Zahodne Sahare.
However, the text of the Agreement does not imply that it recognises Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara.
Vendar nič v besedilu sporazuma ne navaja k temu, da se z njim priznava suverenost Maroka nad Zahodno Saharo.
The Union will also continue to step up its efforts in support of the process, initiated and pursued through the United Nations, working towards a peaceful resolution of the dispute.
Unija bo sicer še naprej krepila prizadevanja v podporo procesu za mirno rešitev spora, ki so ga začeli Združeni narodi in se v njihovem okviru še vedno nadaljuje.
The Commission has thus negotiated, on behalf of the Union, an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Association Agreement (the ‘Agreement’), which was initialled on 31 January 2018.
Komisija je zato v imenu Unije izpogajala sporazum v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko o spremembi protokolov št. 1 in št. 4 k pridružitvenemu sporazumu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporazum), ki je bil parafiran 31. januarja 2018.
The Agreement helps achieve the aims pursued by the Union under Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
Sporazum prispeva k uresničitvi ciljev, ki jih Unija izpolnjuje na podlagi člena 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Therefore, the Agreement should be signed,
Zato je primerno podpisati sporazum –
The signature, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part (the ‘Agreement’), is approved, subject to the conclusion of that Agreement.
Podpis, v imenu Unije, sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko o spremembi protokolov št. 1 in št. 4 k Evro-mediteranskemu pridružitvenem sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kraljevino Maroko na drugi strani (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporazum) se odobri s pridržkom sklenitve navedenega sporazuma.
OJ L 70, 18.3.2000, p. 2.
UL L 70, 18.3.2000, str. 2.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 December 2016, Council of the European Union v Polisario Front, C-104/16 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:973.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. decembra 2016, Svet/Front Polisario, C-104/16 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:973.
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1904
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2018/1904
authorising the Netherlands to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
o dovoljenju Nizozemski, da uvede posebni ukrep, ki odstopa od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost
Pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Member States which have not exercised the option under Article 14 of Council Directive 67/228/EEC may exempt taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 5000 from value added tax (VAT) or the equivalent in national currency.
V skladu s prvim odstavkom člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES lahko države članice, ki niso uporabile izbire iz člena 14 Direktive Sveta 67/228/EGS, davčne zavezance, katerih letni promet je največ enak 5000 EUR ali protivrednosti tega zneska v nacionalni valuti, oprostijo obveznosti v zvezi z davkom na dodano vrednost (DDV).
By letter registered with the Commission on 19 July 2018, the Netherlands requested authorisation to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC in order to apply an exemption threshold of EUR 25000.
V dopisu, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 19. julija 2018, je Nizozemska zaprosila za dovoljenje, da uvede poseben ukrep, ki odstopa od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES, ki bi ji omogočil uporabo praga za oprostitev v višini 25000 EUR.
Through that special measure taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 25000 would be exempt from certain or all of the obligations in relation to VAT as referred to in Chapters 2 to 6 of Title XI of Directive 2006/112/EC.
Na podlagi tega posebnega ukrepa bi bili davčni zavezanci, katerih letni promet znaša največ 25000 EUR, oproščeni določenih ali vseh obveznosti v zvezi z DDV iz poglavij 2 do 6 naslova XI Direktive 2006/112/ES.
A higher threshold for the special scheme for small enterprises set out in Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC is a simplification measure, as it may significantly reduce the VAT obligations of small enterprises.
Višji prag v posebni ureditvi za mala podjetja, določeni v členih 281 do 294 Direktive 2006/112/ES, je ukrep poenostavitve, saj lahko znatno zmanjša obveznosti v zvezi z DDV za mala podjetja.
That special scheme is optional for taxable persons.
Navedena posebna ureditev za davčne zavezance ni obvezna.
By letter dated 13 August 2018, the Commission notified the Netherlands that it had all the information necessary for the appraisal of the request.
Ker se členi 281 do 294 Direktive 2006/112/ES, ki določajo posebno ureditev za mala podjetja, pregledujejo, ni mogoče izključiti, da bo pred iztekom veljavnosti odstopanja 31. decembra 2022 sprejeta direktiva, ki bo spreminjala navedene člene in v kateri bo določen datum, od katerega bodo morale države članice uporabljati nacionalne določbe za njeno izvajanje.
Given that the Netherlands expects that the increased threshold will result in reduced VAT obligations and thus a reduction in administrative burdens and compliance costs for small enterprises, the Netherlands should be authorised to apply the special measure for a limited period of time, until 31 December 2022.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Nizozemska, bo imel zvišani prag le zanemarljiv učinek na skupni znesek davčnih prihodkov Nizozemske, pobranih na ravni končne potrošnje.
The special scheme for small enterprises is optional, so taxable persons would still be able to opt for the normal VAT arrangements.
Odstopanje ne vpliva na lastna sredstva Unije iz naslova DDV, ker mora Nizozemska izračunati nadomestilo v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1553/89 –
As Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the special scheme for small enterprises are subject to review, it is possible that a directive amending those Articles will be adopted and will set a date from which Member States are to apply national provisions before the period of validity of the derogation expires on 31 December 2022.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
In that case, this Decision should cease to apply.
Člen 1
Based on information provided by the Netherlands, the increased threshold will only have a negligible impact on the overall amount of the tax revenue of the Netherlands collected at the final stage of consumption.
Z odstopanjem od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES se Nizozemski dovoli, da davčne zavezance, katerih letni promet znaša največ 25000 EUR, oprosti obveznosti v zvezi z DDV.
The derogation has no impact on the Union's own resources accruing from VAT because the Netherlands is to carry out a compensation calculation in accordance with Article 6 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89,
Člen 2
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Ta sklep se uporablja od 1. januarja 2020 do zgodnejšega od naslednjih dveh datumov: