natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) ( OJ L 283, 31.10.2017, p. 1).
Sklep 2014/886/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2014 o imenovanju evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov in pomočnika nadzornika (UL L 351, 9.12.2014, str. 9).
Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) 2016/679 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta in Direktiva (EU) 2016/680 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta sta bili sprejeti 27. aprila 2016.
Commission Directive 2008/63/EC of 20 June 2008 on competition in the markets in telecommunications terminal equipment (OJ L 162, 21.6.2008, p. 20).
Uredba določa splošna pravila za varstvo posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in zagotavljanje prostega pretoka osebnih podatkov v Uniji, Direktiva pa določa posebna pravila za varstvo posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in zagotavljanje prostega pretoka osebnih podatkov v Uniji na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah in policijskega sodelovanja.
Council Decision 2009/917/JHA of 30 November 2009 on the use of information technology for customs purposes (OJ L 323, 10.12.2009, p. 20).
Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 in Sklep št. 1247/2002/ES se razveljavita z učinkom od 11. decembra 2018.
Decision 2014/886/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2014 appointing the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor (OJ L 351, 9.12.2014, p. 9).
Sklicevanja na razveljavljeno uredbo in razveljavljeni sklep se razumejo kot sklicevanja na to uredbo.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council were adopted on 27 April 2016.
A. Tajani
While the Regulation lays down general rules to protect natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and to ensure the free movement of personal data within the Union, the Directive lays down the specific rules to protect natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and to ensure the free movement of personal data within the Union in the fields of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation.
K. Edtstadler
Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2018/1726 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA), and amending Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011
o Agenciji Evropske unije za operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice (eu-LISA), o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklepa Sveta 2007/533/PNZ ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 1077/2011
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in particular Article 74, Article 77(2)(a) and (b), Article 78(2)(e), Article 79(2)(c), Article 82(1)(d), Article 85(1), Article 87(2)(a) and Article 88(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 74, člena 77(2)(a) in (b), člena 78(2)(e), člena 79(2)(c), člena 82(1)(d), člena 85(1), člena 87(2)(a) ter člena 88(2) Pogodbe,
The Schengen Information System (SIS II) was established by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and by Council Decision 2007/533/JHA.
Schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS II) je bil vzpostavljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta in s Sklepom Sveta 2007/533/PNZ.
Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Decision 2007/533/JHA provide that the Commission is to be responsible, during a transitional period, for the operational management of the central system of SIS II (Central SIS II).
Uredba (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklep 2007/533/PNZ določata, da je za operativno upravljanje centralnega sistema SIS II (v nadaljnjem besedilu: centralni SIS II) v prehodnem obdobju odgovorna Komisija.
After that transitional period, a Management Authority is to be responsible for the operational management of Central SIS II and certain aspects of the communication infrastructure.
Po tem prehodnem obdobju je za operativno upravljanje centralnega SIS II in nekatere vidike komunikacijske infrastrukture odgovoren organ za upravljanje.
The Visa Information System (VIS) was established by Council Decision 2004/512/EC.
Vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS) je bil vzpostavljen z Odločbo Sveta 2004/512/ES.
Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council provides that the Commission is to be responsible, during a transitional period, for the operational management of the VIS.
Uredba (ES) št. 767/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta določa, da je za operativno upravljanje VIS v prehodnem obdobju odgovorna Komisija.
After that transitional period, a Management Authority is to be responsible for the operational management of the central VIS and of the national interfaces and for certain aspects of the communication infrastructure.
Po tem prehodnem obdobju bo za operativno upravljanje centralnega VIS in nacionalnih vmesnikov ter za določene vidike komunikacijske infrastrukture odgovoren organ za upravljanje.
Eurodac was established by Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000.
Sistem Eurodac je bil vzpostavljen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2725/2000.
Council Regulation (EC) No 407/2002 laid down necessary implementing rules.
Potrebna izvedbena pravila so bila določena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 407/2002.
Those legal acts were repealed and replaced by Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with effect from 20 July 2015.
Navedena pravna akta sta bila razveljavljena in nadomeščena z Uredbo (EU) št. 603/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z učinkom od 20. julija 2015.
The European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT (information technology) systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, commonly referred to as eu-LISA, was established by Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council in order to ensure the operational management of SIS, the VIS and Eurodac and of certain aspects of their communication infrastructures and potentially that of other large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, subject to the adoption of separate Union legal acts.
Evropska agencija za operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice, običajno imenovana kot eu-LISA, je bila vzpostavljena z Uredbo (EU) št. 1077/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z namenom zagotoviti operativno upravljanje SIS, VIS in sistema Eurodac ter nekaterih vidikov njihove komunikacijske infrastrukture in potencialno tudi drugih obsežnih informacijskih sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice, če bi tako določali ločeni pravni akti Unije.
Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 was amended by Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 in order to reflect the changes introduced to Eurodac.
Uredba (EU) št. 1077/2011 je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (EU) št. 603/2013, da bi odražala spremembe sistema Eurodac.
Since the Management Authority required legal, administrative and financial autonomy, it was established in the form of a regulatory agency (the ‘Agency’) with legal personality.
Ker je moral biti organ za upravljanje pravno, upravno in finančno avtonomen, je bil ustanovljen kot regulativna agencija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) s pravno osebnostjo.
As was agreed, the seat of the Agency was established in Tallinn, Estonia.
Kot je bilo dogovorjeno, je bil za sedež Agencije določen Talin, Estonija.
However, since the tasks relating to the technical development and the preparation for the operational management of SIS II and the VIS were already being carried out in Strasbourg, France, and a backup site for those systems had been installed in Sankt Johann im Pongau, Austria, in line also with the locations of SIS II and the VIS as established under the relevant Union legal acts, this should continue to be the case.
Ker pa so se naloge, povezane s tehničnim razvojem in pripravami na operativno upravljanje SIS II in VIS, že opravljale v Strasbourgu, Francija, in ker je bil podporni center za te sisteme vzpostavljen v Sankt Johannu im Pongau, Avstrija, kar je tudi v skladu z lokacijama SIS II in VIS, vzpostavljenima z ustreznimi pravnimi akti Unije, bi to moralo ostati nespremenjeno.
Those two sites should also continue to be the locations, respectively, where the tasks relating to operational management of Eurodac are carried out and where a backup site for Eurodac is established.
Ti dve lokaciji bi morali še naprej biti lokaciji, kjer se izvajajo naloge, povezane z operativnim upravljanjem sistema Eurodac, oziroma se tam nahaja podporni center za sistem Eurodac.
Those two sites should also be the locations, respectively, for the technical development and operational management of other large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice and for a backup site capable of ensuring the operation of a large-scale IT system in the event of failure of that large-scale IT system.
Na teh lokacijah bi bilo treba tudi slediti tehničnemu razvoju in operativnemu upravljanju drugih obsežnih informacijskih sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter bi morali gostiti podporni center, ki lahko zagotovi delovanje obsežnega informacijskega sistema v primeru odpovedi navedenega obsežnega informacijskega sistema.
In order to maximise the possible use of the backup site, that site could also be used to operate systems simultaneously provided that it remains capable of ensuring their operation in the event of failure of one or more of the systems.
Za čim boljši izkoristek morebitne uporabe podpornega centra bi se ta center lahko uporabljal tudi za hkratno upravljanje sistemov, če je pri tem zmožen zagotavljati njihovo delovanje v primeru odpovedi enega ali več sistemov.
Due to the high-security, high-availability and mission-critical nature of the systems, if the hosting capacity of the existing technical sites becomes insufficient, it should be possible for the Agency’s Management Board (the Management Board), where justified on the basis of an independent impact assessment and cost-benefit analysis, to propose the establishment of a second separate technical site either in Strasbourg or in Sankt Johann im Pongau or in both locations, as required, in order to host the systems.
Zaradi posebne narave sistemov, ki je povezana z visoko varnostjo, dobro dosegljivostjo in ključnim pomenom za izvedbo naloge, bi moral imeti v primeru, da pride do nezadostne zmogljivosti obstoječih tehničnih lokacij, upravni odbor Agencije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: upravni odbor) možnost, kadar je to utemeljeno na podlagi neodvisne ocene učinka in analize stroškov in koristi, da predlaga vzpostavitev druge ločene tehnične lokacije v Strasbourgu ali v Sankt Johannu im Pongau ali po potrebi v obeh krajih za gostovanje sistemov.
The Management Board should consult the Commission and take its views into account before notifying the European Parliament and the Council (the ‘budgetary authority’) of its intention to implement any project related to property.
Upravni odbor bi se moral posvetovati s Komisijo in upoštevati njena stališča, preden obvesti Evropski parlament in Svet (v nadaljnjem besedilu: proračunski organ) o nameravani izvedbi kakršnega koli projekta v zvezi s premoženjem.
Since taking up its responsibilities on 1 December 2012, the Agency took over the tasks conferred on the Management Authority in relation to the VIS by Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 and Council Decision 2008/633/JHA.
Agencija je od 1. decembra 2012, ko je začela izvajati svoje pristojnosti, prevzela naloge, ki so bile zaupane organu za upravljanje v zvezi z VIS v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 767/2008 in Sklepom Sveta 2008/633/PNZ.
In April 2013, the Agency also took over the tasks conferred on the Management Authority in relation to SIS II by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Decision 2007/533/JHA after SIS II went live and, in June 2013, it took over the tasks conferred on the Commission in relation to Eurodac in accordance with Regulations (EC) No 2725/2000 and (EC) No 407/2002.
Aprila 2013 je prevzela tudi naloge, ki so bile zaupane organu za upravljanje v zvezi s SIS II v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklepom 2007/533/PNZ po začetku delovanja SIS II, junija 2013 pa je prevzela tudi naloge, ki so bile zaupane Komisiji v zvezi s sistemom Eurodac v skladu z uredbama (ES) št. 2725/2000 in (ES) št. 407/2002.
The first evaluation of the Agency’s work, based on an independent external evaluation and carried out in the period 2015-2016 concluded that the Agency effectively ensures the operational management of the large-scale IT systems and other tasks entrusted to it but also that a number of changes to Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 are necessary such as the transfer to the Agency of the communication infrastructure tasks retained by the Commission.
V prvi oceni dela Agencije, ki je temeljila na neodvisni zunanji oceni in je bila izvedena v obdobju 2015–2016, je bilo ugotovljeno, da Agencija učinkovito zagotavlja operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov in drugih nalog, ki so ji poverjene, pokazala pa je tudi, da je potrebnih več sprememb Uredbe (EU) št. 1077/2011, kot je prenos nalog komunikacijske infrastrukture, ki jih je ohranila Komisija, na Agencijo.
Building on that external evaluation, the Commission took into account policy, legal and factual developments and proposed, in particular in its report of 29 June 2017 on the functioning of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) (the evaluation report), that the mandate of the Agency be extended to carry out the tasks deriving from the adoption by the co-legislators of legislative proposals entrusting new systems to the Agency and the tasks referred to in the Commission’s Communication of 6 April 2016 entitled ‘Stronger and Smarter Information Systems for Borders and Security’, in the High-Level Expert Group on Information Systems and Interoperability’s final report of 11 May 2017 and in the Commission’s Communication of 16 May 2017 entitled ‘Seventh progress report towards an effective and genuine Security Union’, subject to the adoption of the relevant Union legal acts, where required.
Komisija je na podlagi te zunanje ocene upoštevala politične in pravne spremembe ter dejanski razvoj dogodkov ter zlasti v svojem Poročilu z dne 29. junija 2017 o delovanju Evropske agencije za operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice (eu-LISA) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ocenjevalno poročilo) predlagala, da se mandat Agencije razširi na izvajanje nalog, ki izhajajo iz zakonodajnih predlogov, ki jih sprejmeta sozakonodajalca in s katerimi se Agenciji poverijo novi sistemi, ter na izvajanje nalog iz sporočila Komisije z dne 6. aprila 2016 z naslovom: Trdnejši in pametnejši informacijski sistemi za meje in varnost ter nalog iz končnega poročila strokovne skupine na visoki ravni za informacijske sisteme in interoperabilnost z dne 11. maja 2017 in iz sporočila Komisije z dne 16. maja 2017 z naslovom: Sedmo poročilo o napredku pri vzpostavljanju učinkovite in prave varnostne unije, po potrebi pod pogojem sprejetja ustreznih pravnih aktov Unije.
In particular, the Agency should be tasked with the development of solutions regarding interoperability defined in the Communication of 6 April 2016 as the ability of information systems to exchange data and to enable the sharing of information.
Zlasti bi morala biti Agencija zadolžena za razvoj rešitev v zvezi z interoperabilnostjo, določenih v sporočilu z dne 6. aprila 2016, kot zmožnost informacijskih sistemov, da izmenjujejo podatke in omogočajo izmenjavo informacij.
Where relevant, any actions carried out with regard to interoperability should be guided by the Commission’s Communication of 23 March 2017 entitled ‘European Interoperability Framework — Implementation Strategy’.
Kadar je to primerno, bi morali kakršni koli ukrepi, ki se izvajajo v zvezi z interoperabilnostjo, temeljiti na Sporočilu Komisije z dne 23. marca 2017 z naslovom: Evropski okvir interoperabilnosti – strategija za izvajanje.
Annex 2 of that Communication provides the general guidelines, recommendations and best practices for achieving interoperability or for, at least, creating the environment to achieve better interoperability when designing, implementing and managing European public services.
Priloga 2 k navedenem sporočilu določa splošne smernice, priporočila in najboljšo prakso za doseganje interoperabilnosti ali vsaj za omogočanje okolja za doseganje boljše interoperabilnosti pri načrtovanju, izvajanju in upravljanju evropskih javnih storitev.
The evaluation report also concluded that the Agency’s mandate should be extended to enable it to provide Member States with advice with regard to the connection of national systems to the central systems of the large-scale IT systems it manages (the ‘systems’) and with ad hoc assistance and support, where requested, and to provide the Commission services with assistance and support on technical issues related to new systems.
V ocenjevalnem poročilu je poleg tega ugotovljeno, da bi bilo treba mandat Agencije razširiti, da bi ji bilo omogočeno svetovanje državam članicam v zvezi s povezavo nacionalnih sistemov s centralnimi sistemi obsežnih informacijskih sistemov, ki jih upravlja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistemi), ter ad hoc pomoč in podpora državam članicam, kadar je to zahtevano, pa tudi zagotavljanje pomoči in podpore službam Komisije glede tehničnih vprašanj v zvezi z novimi sistemi.
The Agency should be entrusted with the preparation, development and operational management of the Entry/Exit System (EES), established by Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Agenciji bi bilo treba poveriti pripravo, razvoj in operativno upravljanje sistema vstopa/izstopa (SVI), vzpostavljenega z Uredbo (EU) 2017/2226 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
The Agency should also be entrusted with the operational management of DubliNet, a separate secure electronic transmission channel set up under Article 18 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003, which Member States’ competent asylum authorities should use for the exchange of information on applicants for international protection.
Agenciji bi bilo treba tudi poveriti operativno upravljanje omrežja DubliNet, ki je ločen kanal za prenos preko varnih elektronskih sredstev, vzpostavljen na podlagi člena 18 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1560/2003, ki bi ga morali pristojni organi držav članic, pristojni za odločanje o azilu, uporabljati za izmenjavo informacij o prosilcih za mednarodno zaščito.
The Agency should further be entrusted with the preparation, development and operational management of the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS), established by Regulation (EU) 2018/1240 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Agenciji bi bilo treba poveriti pripravo, razvoj in operativno upravljanje evropskega sistema za potovalne informacije in odobritve (ETIAS), vzpostavljenega z Uredbo (EU) 2018/1240 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
The core function of the Agency should continue to be the fulfilment of the operational management tasks for SIS II, the VIS, Eurodac, the EES, DubliNet, ETIAS and, if so decided, other large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice.
Glavna naloga Agencije bi moralo biti še naprej operativno upravljanje SIS II, VIS, sistema Eurodac, SVI, omrežja DubliNet, ETIAS in, če bo tako odločeno, drugih obsežnih informacijskih sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
The Agency should also be responsible for technical measures required as a result of the non-normative tasks with which it is entrusted.
Agencija bi morala biti odgovorna tudi za tehnične ukrepe, povezane s poverjenimi nalogami, ki niso normativne.
Those responsibilities should be without prejudice to the normative tasks reserved for the Commission alone or for the Commission assisted by a Committee in the respective Union legal acts governing the systems.
Navedene odgovornosti ne bi smele posegati v tiste normativne naloge, za katere je izključno pristojna Komisija oziroma pri katerih Komisiji pomaga odbor v skladu s posameznimi pravnimi akti Unije, ki urejajo sisteme.
The Agency should be able to implement technical solutions in order to comply with the availability requirements laid down in the Union legal acts governing the systems, while fully respecting the specific provisions of those acts with regard to the technical architecture of the respective systems.
Agencija bi morala imeti možnost, da izvaja tehnične rešitve za doseganje skladnosti z zahtevami glede razpoložljivosti, ki so določene v pravnih aktih Unije, ki urejajo sisteme, ob vsestranskem spoštovanju posebnih določb teh aktov v zvezi s tehnično strukturo posameznih sistemov.
Where those technical solutions require a duplication of a system or a duplication of components of a system, an independent impact assessment and cost-benefit analysis should be carried out and a decision should be taken by the Management Board following the consultation of the Commission.
Kadar te tehnične rešitve terjajo podvajanje sistema ali podvajanje njegovih sestavnih delov, bi bilo treba izvesti neodvisno oceno učinka ter analizo stroškov in koristi, odločitev pa bi moral sprejeti upravni odbor po posvetovanju s Komisijo.
That impact assessment should also include an examination of the hosting capacity needs of the existing technical sites related to the development of such technical solutions and the possible risks related to the current operational set up.
Ta ocena učinka bi morala vključevati tudi pregled potreb glede gostiteljske zmogljivosti obstoječih tehničnih lokacij, povezanih z razvojem teh tehničnih rešitev, in morebitna tveganja v zvezi s sedanjo operativno ureditvijo.
It is no longer justified for the Commission to retain certain tasks related to the communication infrastructure of the systems and those tasks should therefore be transferred to the Agency in order to improve the coherence of the management of the communication infrastructure.
Ni več upravičeno, da bi Komisija še naprej opravljala nekatere naloge, povezane s komunikacijsko infrastrukturo sistemov, zato bi bilo treba te naloge prenesti na Agencijo, da se izboljša skladnost upravljanja komunikacijske infrastrukture.
However, for those systems that use EuroDomain, a secured communication infrastructure provided by TESTA-ng (Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations-new generation) and set up as part of the ISA Programme that was established by Decision No 922/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and continued as part of the ISA2 Programme that was established by Decision (EU) 2015/2240 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the tasks in relation to the implementation of the budget, acquisition and renewal and contractual matters should be retained by the Commission.
Vendar bi morala pri sistemih, ki uporabljajo EuroDomain, ki je varovana telekomunikacijska infrastruktura, ki jo zagotavlja omrežje TESTA-ng (vseevropske telematske storitve med upravami-nova generacija), in ki je osnovana kot del programa ISA, vzpostavljenega s Sklepom št. 922/2009/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ter nadaljevana kot del programa ISA2, vzpostavljenega s Sklepom (EU) 2015/2240 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, Komisija obdržati naloge v zvezi z izvrševanjem proračuna, nabavami in posodabljanji ter naloge glede pogodbenih vprašanj.