natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the relevant Union law is composed of regulations and where currently those regulations explicitly grant options and discretions for Member States, the ECB should also apply the national legislation exercising those options and discretions.
V primerih, ko gre pri upoštevnem pravu Unije za uredbe, in kadar navedene uredbe trenutno državam članicam izrecno ponujajo različne opcije in diskrecijske pravice, bi morala ECB uporabljati tudi nacionalno zakonodajo, s katero se izvajajo navedene opcije in diskrecijske pravice.
Such options and discretions do not include those granted by Union law to competent authorities which the ECB is solely competent to exercise and should exercise as appropriate.
Te opcije in diskrecijske pravice ne vključujejo tistih, ki jih pravo Unije daje samo pristojnim organom, ter za izvajanje katerih je ECB izključno pristojna in jih mora izvajati po potrebi.
In exercising options and discretions, the ECB should take account of the general principles of Union law, in particular equal treatment, proportionality and the legitimate expectations of supervised credit institutions.
ECB mora pri izvajanju opcij in diskrecijskih pravic upoštevati splošna načela prava Unije, zlasti enako obravnavo, sorazmernost in upravičena pričakovanja nadzorovanih kreditnih institucij.
With regard to the legitimate expectations of supervised credit institutions, the ECB acknowledges the need to allow for transitional periods where its exercise of discretions significantly departs from the approach taken by the national competent authorities prior to the entry into force of this Regulation.
V zvezi z upravičenimi pričakovanji nadzorovanih kreditnih institucij ECB priznava, da je treba v primerih, kjer se njeno izvajanje diskrecijskih pravic pomembno razlikuje od pristopa pristojnih nacionalnih organov pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, omogočiti prehodna obdobja.
In this respect, both credit institutions applying the Standardised Approach and the Internal Ratings Based Approach should have an appropriate transitional period.
S tega vidika bi morale kreditne institucije, ki uporabljajo standardizirani pristop, in tiste, ki uporabljajo pristop na podlagi notranjih bonitetnih ocen, imeti ustrezno prehodno obdobje.
Therefore, credit institutions must apply the threshold for the assessment of the materiality of a credit obligation past due set by this Regulation not later than 31 December 2020 and must notify the ECB, before 1 June 2019, of the exact date on which they will commence applying such threshold.
Zato morajo kreditne institucije prag za oceno pomembnosti kreditne obveznosti v zamudi, določen s to uredbo, začeti uporabljati najpozneje 31. decembra 2020 in pred 1. junijem 2019 obvestiti ECB o točnem datumu, na katerega ga bodo začele uporabljati.
Article 178(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 gives the competent authorities the power to set a threshold for assessing the materiality of a credit obligation past due as referred to in Article 178(1)(b).
Člen 178(2)(d) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 pristojne organe pooblašča, da določijo prag za oceno pomembnosti kreditne obveznosti v zamudi iz člena 178(1)(b).
In setting such a threshold, the ECB should take into account the criteria set out in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/171.
ECB bi morala pri določitvi tega praga upoštevati merila, določena v Delegirani uredbi (EU) 2018/171.
The ECB considers that the threshold in this Regulation for assessing the materiality of a credit obligation past due as referred to in Article 178(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 reflects a reasonable level of risk and its application will enable increased comparability of capital requirements among supervised credit institutions.
ECB meni, da prag, ki je v tej uredbi določen za oceno pomembnosti kreditne obveznosti v zamudi iz člena 178(1)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, odraža razumno raven tveganja in da se bo z njegovo uporabo izboljšala primerljivost kapitalskih zahtev med nadzorovanimi kreditnimi institucijami.
Article 143(1)(b) of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council requires competent authorities to publish the manner of exercise of the options and discretions available in Union law,
Člen 143(1)(b) Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta zahteva, da morajo pristojni organi objaviti način izvajanja opcij in diskrecijskih pravic, ki so na voljo v pravu Unije –
The ECB hereby exercises the discretion conferred on competent authorities under Article 178(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 in relation to the threshold for assessing the materiality of credit obligations past due.
ECB s to uredbo izvaja diskrecijsko pravico v zvezi s pragom za oceno pomembnosti kreditnih obveznosti v zamudi, ki je prenesena na pristojne organe v skladu s členom 178(2)(d) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
This Regulation shall apply exclusively with regard to credit institutions classified as significant in accordance with Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and Part IV and Article 147(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 (ECB/2014/17) and irrespective of the method used for the calculation of their risk-weighted exposure amounts.
Ta uredba se uporablja izključno v zvezi s kreditnimi institucijami, ki se razvrstijo kot pomembne v skladu s členom 6(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1024/2013 in delom IV in členom 147(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 468/2014 (ECB/2014/17), ter ne glede na to, katero metodo te kreditne institucije uporabljajo za izračun zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti.
For the purpose of this Regulation, the definitions contained in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 (ECB/2014/17) shall apply.
V tej uredbi se uporabljajo opredelitve pojmov iz člena 4 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, člena 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 1024/2013 in člena 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 468/2014 (ECB/2014/17).
Article 178(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013: threshold for the assessment of the materiality of a credit obligation past due
Člen 178(2)(d) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013: prag za oceno pomembnosti kreditne obveznosti v zamudi
For the purpose of Article 178(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, credit institutions shall assess the materiality of a credit obligation past due against the following threshold, which comprises two components:
Za namen člena 178(2)(d) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 kreditne institucije ocenijo pomembnost kreditne obveznosti v zamudi glede na naslednji prag, ki ima dve sestavini:
a limit in terms of the sum of all amounts past due owed by the obligor to the credit institution, the parent undertaking of that credit institution or any of its subsidiaries (hereinafter the ‘credit obligation past due’), equal:
omejitev glede vsote vseh zneskov, že zapadlih v plačilo, ki jih dolžnik dolguje kreditni instituciji, nadrejeni osebi te kreditne institucije ali kateri od njenih podrejenih družb (v nadaljnjem besedilu: kreditna obveznost v zamudi), ki znaša:
for retail exposures, to EUR 100;
za izpostavljenosti na drobno 100 EUR;
for exposures other than retail exposures, to EUR 500; and
za izpostavljenosti, ki niso izpostavljenosti na drobno, 500 EUR, in
a limit in terms of the amount of the credit obligation past due in relation to the total amount of all on-balance sheet exposures to that obligor for the credit institution, the parent undertaking or any of its subsidiaries, excluding equity exposures, equal to 1 %.
omejitev glede deleža, ki ga znesek kreditne obveznosti v zamudi predstavlja v skupnem znesku vseh bilančnih izpostavljenosti kreditne institucije, njene nadrejene osebe ali katere od njenih podrejenih družb do tega dolžnika, z izjemo izpostavljenosti iz naslova lastniških instrumentov, ki znaša 1 %.
For credit institutions applying the definition of default laid down in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 178(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 for retail exposures at the level of an individual credit facility, the threshold laid down in paragraph 1 shall apply at the level of the individual credit facility granted to the obligor by the credit institution, the parent undertaking or any of its subsidiaries.
Za institucije, ki za izpostavljenosti na drobno uporabljajo opredelitev neplačila iz točk (a) in (b) prvega pododstavka člena 178(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 na ravni posamezne izpostavljenosti, se prag iz odstavka 1 uporablja na ravni posamezne izpostavljenosti kreditne institucije, njene nadrejene osebe ali katere od njenih podrejenih družb do dolžnika.
A default shall be deemed to have occurred when both of the limits set out in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 are exceeded for 90 consecutive days.
Šteje se, da neplačilo nastopi, ko sta obe omejitvi iz točk (a) in (b) odstavka 1 preseženi 90 zaporednih dni.
Date of application of the materiality threshold
Datum začetka uporabe praga pomembnosti
They shall notify the ECB, before 1 June 2019, of the exact date on which they will commence applying such threshold.
Začetek veljavnosti
Entry into force
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v državah članicah v skladu s Pogodbama.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Frankfurtu na Majni, 21. novembra 2018
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 21 November 2018.
Predsednik ECB
For the Governing Council of the ECB
UL L 287, 29.10.2013, str. 63.
The President of the ECB
UL L 176, 27.6.2013, str. 1.
OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 63.
UL L 32, 6.2.2018, str. 1.
OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1.
Uredba (EU) št. 468/2014 Evropske centralne banke z dne 16. aprila 2014 o vzpostavitvi okvira za sodelovanje znotraj enotnega mehanizma nadzora med Evropsko centralno banko in pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi ter z imenovanimi nacionalnimi organi (okvirna uredba o EMN) (ECB/2014/17) (UL L 141, 14.5.2014, str. 1).
OJ L 32, 6.2.2018, p. 1.
Direktiva 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o dostopu do dejavnosti kreditnih institucij in bonitetnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij, spremembi Direktive 2002/87/ES in razveljavitvi direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES (UL L 176, 27.6.2013, str. 338).
Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 establishing the framework for cooperation within the Single Supervisory Mechanism between the European Central Bank and national competent authorities and with national designated authorities (SSM Framework Regulation) (ECB/2014/17) (OJ L 141, 14.5.2014, p. 1).
Kreditne institucije začnejo uporabljati prag za oceno pomembnosti kreditnih obveznosti v zamudi, določen s to uredbo, najpozneje 31. decembra 2020.
Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338).
Pred 1. junijem 2019 obvestijo ECB o točnem datumu, na katerega bodo ta prag začele uporabljati.
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products, and in particular Article 31(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1223/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. novembra 2009 o kozmetičnih izdelkih ter zlasti člena 31(1) Uredbe,
The substance Biphenyl-2-ol and its salts, which have been assigned the names o-phenylphenol, MEA o-phenylphenate, potassium o-phenylphenate and sodium o-phenylphenate under the International Nomenclature of Cosmetics Ingredients (INCI), are currently allowed as preservatives in cosmetic products with a maximum concentration of 0,2 % (as phenol) in ready for use preparation under entry 7 of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.
Snov bifenil-2-ol in njene soli, ki so jim v okviru mednarodne nomenklature za kozmetične sestavine (INCI) bila dodeljena imena o-fenilfenol, MEA o-fenilfenat, kalijev o-fenilfenat in natrijev o-fenilfenat, so trenutno v skladu z vnosom 7 Priloge V Uredbe (ES) št. 1223/2009 dovoljeni konzervansi v kozmetičnih izdelkih, pripravljenih za uporabo, v najvišji koncentraciji 0,2 % (kot fenol).
The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) concluded in its opinion of 25 June 2015, revision of 15 December 2015, as regards the use of o-phenylphenol as a preservative, that a maximum concentration of 0,2 % in leave-on cosmetic products is not safe, while a maximum concentration of 0,15 % in such products can be considered safe, and that a maximum concentration of 0,2 % in rinse-off cosmetic products is considered safe.
Znanstveni odbor za varstvo potrošnikov (ZOVP) je v svojem mnenju z dne 25. junija 2015, ki je bilo revidirano 15. decembra 2015, v zvezi z uporabo o-fenilfenola kot konzervansa v kozmetičnih izdelkih, ki se ne odstranijo, ugotovil, da ni varen za potrošnike, kadar se uporablja v najvišji koncentraciji 0,2 %, v najvišji koncentraciji 0,15 % v takšnih proizvodih pa se lahko šteje za varnega; za varnega se lahko šteje tudi, kadar se uporablja v najvišji koncentraciji 0,2 % v kozmetičnih izdelkih, ki se sperejo.
The SCCS also concluded that there might be a potential of injury to the vision system attributable to o-phenylphenol.
ZOVP je na tudi ugotovil, da bi o-fenilfenolu morda lahko pripisali tveganje poškodovanja vidnega sistema.
Following concerns raised by several Member States regarding the use of MEA o-phenylphenate, potassium o-phenylphenate and sodium o-phenylphenate, the SCCS indicated in an addendum to the above-mentioned opinion, adopted on 21-22 February 2018, that the same conclusions on the safe use levels of o-phenylphenol cannot be applied as such to sodium o-phenylphenate, potassium o-phenylphenate or MEA o-phenylphenate.
Po tem, ko je več držav članic izrazilo pomisleke glede uporabe MEA o-fenilfenata, kalijevega o-fenilfenata in natrijevega o-fenilfenata, je ZOVP v dopolnilu k navedenemu mnenju, sprejetem 21.–22. februarja 2018, navedel, da se ugotovitve o uporabi varnih stopenj o-fenilfenola ne morejo uporabljati kot take za natrijev o-fenilfenat, kalijev o-fenilfenat ali MEA o-fenilfenat.
The SCCS stated that sodium o-phenylphenate, potassium o-phenylphenate and MEA o-phenylphenate may have potentially more potent toxic effects than o-phenylphenol due to greater skin penetration.
ZOVP je navedel, da imajo lahko natrijev o-fenilfenat, kalijev o-fenilfenat in MEA o-fenilfenat potencialno večji strupeni učinek kot o-fenilfenol zaradi večje penetracije skozi kožo.
The SCCS concluded that a potential risk to human health from the use of these substances as preservatives in cosmetic products cannot be excluded.
ZOVP je ugotovil, da se morebitnega tveganja za zdravje ljudi, ki izhaja iz uporabe teh snovi kot konzervansov v kozmetičnih izdelkih, ne da izključiti.
In light of the above-mentioned SCCS opinions and in view of the potential risk to human health arising from the use of those substances, the use of o-phenylphenol as a preservative should be allowed with a maximum concentration of 0,15 % in leave-on and 0,2 % in rinse-off cosmetic products.
Glede na navedena mnenja ZOVP in zaradi morebitnega tveganja za zdravje ljudi, ki izhaja iz uporabe te snovi, bi bilo treba uporabo o-fenilfenola kot konzervansa v kozmetičnih izdelkih, ki se ne odstranijo, omejiti na najvišjo koncentracijo 0,15 %, v kozmetičnih izdelkih, ki se sperejo, pa na 0,2 %.
In addition, it should be indicated that contact with eyes should be avoided.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba navesti, da je treba preprečiti stik z očmi.
The use of sodium o-phenylphenate, potassium o-phenylphenate and MEA o-phenylphenate as preservatives should not be allowed.
Uporaba natrijevega o-fenilfenata, kalijevega o-fenilfenata in MEA o-fenilfenata kot konzervansov ne bi smela iti dovoljena.
Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1223/2009 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The industry should be allowed a reasonable period of time to adapt to the new requirements by making the necessary adjustments to product formulations to ensure that only products complying with those requirements are placed on the market.
Industriji bi moral biti na voljo razumen čas za prilagoditev formulacij izdelkov na nove zahteve z namenom, da se na trg dajo samo izdelki, ki navedene zahteve izpolnjujejo.
In Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, entry 7 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
V Prilogi V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1223/2009 se vnos 7 nadomesti z besedilom, določenim v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
From 17 June 2019 cosmetic products containing Biphenyl-2-ol and not complying with the conditions laid down in this Regulation shall not be placed on the Union market.
Od 17. junija 2019 se kozmetični izdelki, ki vsebujejo bifenil-2-ol in niso skladni s pogoji iz te uredbe, ne dajejo na trg Unije.
From 17 September 2019 cosmetic products containing Biphenyl-2-ol and not complying with the conditions laid down in this Regulation shall not be made available on the Union market.
Od 17. septembra 2019 kozmetični izdelki, ki vsebujejo bifenil-2-ol in niso skladni s pogoji iz te uredbe, niso dostopni na trgu Unije.
From 17 June 2019 cosmetic products containing Sodium 2-biphenylate, Potassium 2-biphenylate or 2-aminoethan-1-ol; 2-phenylphenol as preservatives shall not be placed on the Union market.
Od 17. junija 2019 se kozmetični izdelki, ki vsebujejo natrijev 2-bifenilat, kalijev 2-bifenilat ali 2-aminoetan-1-ol; 2-fenilfenol kot konzervanse, ne dajejo na trg Unije.
From 17 September 2019 cosmetic products containing Sodium 2-biphenylate, Potassium 2-biphenylate or 2-aminoethan-1-ol; 2-phenylphenol as preservatives shall not be made available on the Union market.
Od 17. septembra 2019 kozmetični izdelki, ki vsebujejo natrijev 2-bifenilat, kalijev 2-bifenilat ali 2-aminoetan-1-ol; 2-fenilfenol kot konzervanse, niso dostopni na trgu Unije.
Article 1 shall apply from 17 June 2019.
Člen 1 se uporablja od 17. junija 2019.
OJ L 342, 22.12.2009, p. 59.
UL L 342, 22.12.2009, str. 59.
SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Opinion on o-Phenylphenol, Sodium o-phenylphenate and Potassium o-phenylphenate, 25 June 2015, SCCS/1555/15, revision of 15 December 2015
Znanstveni odbor za varstvo potrošnikov (ZOVP), mnenje o o-fenilfenolu, natrijevem o-fenilfenatu in kalijevem o-fenilfenatu, 25. junij 2015, SCCS/1555/15, revizija z dne 15. decembra 2015.
SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Addendum to the scientific opinion on the use as preservative of o-Phenylphenol, Sodium ophenylphenate and Potassium o-phenylphenate (SCCS/1555/15) Here: the use as preservative of Sodium o-phenylphenate, Potassium o-phenylphenate, MEA o-Phenylphenate 21-22/02/2018, SCCS/1597/18
Znanstveni odbor za varstvo potrošnikov (ZOVP), dodatek k znanstvenemu mnenju o uporabi o-fenilfenola, natrijevega o-fenilfenata in kalijevega o-fenilfenata kot konzervansov (SCCS/1555/15), tukaj: uporaba natrijevega o-fenilfenata in kalijevega o-fenilfenata in MEA o-fenilfenata kot konzervansov, 21.–22.2.2018, SCCS/1597/18.
Rinse-off Products
izdelki, ki se sperejo
0,15 % (as phenol)
0,15 % (kot fenol)
From 17 June 2019 cosmetic products containing Biphenyl-2-ol and not complying with those conditions shall not be placed on the Union market.
Od 17. junija 2019 se kozmetični izdelki, ki vsebujejo bifenil-2-ol in niso skladni z navedenimi pogoji, ne dajejo na trg Unije.
From 17 September 2019 cosmetic products containing Biphenyl-2-ol and not complying with those conditions shall not be made available on the Union market.’
Od 17. septembra 2019 kozmetični izdelki, ki vsebujejo bifenil-2-ol in niso skladni z navedenimi pogoji, niso dostopni na trgu Unije.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1848
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2018/1848
on the reimbursement, in accordance with Article 26(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of the appropriations carried over from financial year 2018
o povrnitvi odobritev, prenesenih iz proračunskega leta 2018, v skladu s členom 26(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008, and in particular Article 26(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o financiranju, upravljanju in spremljanju skupne kmetijske politike in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 352/78, (ES) št. 165/94, (ES) št. 2799/98, (ES) št. 814/2000, (ES) št. 1290/2005 in (ES) št. 485/2008 ter zlasti člena 26(6) Uredbe,
In accordance with point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council non-committed appropriations relating to the actions financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) as referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 may be carried over to the following financial year.
v skladu s točko (d) prvega pododstavka člena 12(2) Uredbe (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta se lahko odobritve, za katere obveznosti niso prevzete, v zvezi z ukrepi, ki se financirajo iz Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS) in so navedeni v členu 4(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013, prenesejo v naslednje proračunsko leto.
Such carryover is limited to 2 % of the initial appropriations voted by the European Parliament and by the Council and to the amount of the adjustment of direct payments as referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council which was applied during the preceding financial year.
Takšen prenos je omejen na 2 % začetnih odobritev, o katerih glasujeta Evropski parlament in Svet, in na znesek prilagoditve neposrednih plačil iz člena 8 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ki je bil izveden v predhodnem proračunskem letu.
In accordance with Article 26(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, by way of derogation from the third subparagraph of Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, Member States are to reimburse the carryover referred to in point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 to the final recipients who are subject to the adjustment rate in the financial year to which the appropriations are carried over.
V skladu s členom 26(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 države članice z odstopanjem od tretjega pododstavka člena 12(2) Uredbe (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 prenesene odobritve iz točke (d) prvega pododstavka člena 12(2) Uredbe (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 povrnejo končnim prejemnikom, za katere se v proračunskem letu, v katero se odobritve prenesejo, uporablja prilagoditvena stopnja.
That reimbursement only applies to final beneficiaries in those Member States where financial discipline applied in the preceding financial year.
Navedena povrnitev se uporabi le za končne upravičence v tistih državah članicah, v katerih se je v predhodnem proračunskem letu uporabila finančna disciplina.
When setting the amount of the carryover to be reimbursed, in accordance with Article 26(7) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 the amounts of the reserve for crises in the agricultural sector referred to in Article 25 of that Regulation, not made available for crisis measures by the end of the financial year, are to be taken into account.
Pri določanju zneska prenesenih odobritev, ki ga je treba povrniti, je treba v skladu s členom 26(7) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 upoštevati zneske za rezervo za krize v kmetijskem sektorju iz člena 25 navedene uredbe, ki do konca proračunskega leta niso uporabljeni za krizne ukrepe.