natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the application has not been filed in that language, the proprietor may request that the applicant file a translation in that language.
Če vloga ni bila vložena v navedenem jeziku, lahko imetnik zahteva, da stranka, ki ugovarja, vloži prevod v navedeni jezik.
Such a request shall be received by the Office before the expiry of the period of two months of receipt by the EU trade mark proprietor of the communication referred to in Article 17(1).
Urad tako zahtevo prejme najpozneje dva meseca po datumu, na katerega je imetnik blagovne znamke EU prejel sporočilo iz člena 17(1).
The Office shall specify a time limit for the applicant to file such a translation.
Urad vložniku določi rok za vložitev tega prevoda.
Where that translation is not filed or filed late, the language of the proceedings shall remain unchanged.
Kadar ta prevod ni vložen ali je vložen prepozno, ostane jezik postopka nespremenjen.
Information to the parties concerning an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Informacije za stranke v zvezi z zahtevo za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti
An application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity and any document submitted by the applicant, as well as any communication addressed to one of the parties by the Office prior to the finding on admissibility shall be sent by the Office to the other party for the purposes of informing of the introduction of an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity.
Zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti in vsaka dokumentacija, ki jo predloži vložnik, kot tudi vsako sporočilo, ki ga pred sklepom o dopustnosti Urad naslovi na katero izmed strank, Urad pošlje drugi stranki za namene obveščanja o uvedbi zahteve za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti.
Admissibility of an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Dopustnost zahteve za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti
Where the fee required under Article 63(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 has not been paid, the Office shall invite the applicant to pay the fee within a period specified by it.
Če pristojbina, določena v členu 63(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, ni bila plačana, Urad vložnika pozove k plačilu pristojbine v določenem roku.
Where the required fee is not paid within the specified period, the Office shall inform the applicant that the application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity is deemed not to have been entered.
Če zahtevana pristojbina ni plačana v določenem roku, Urad vložnika obvesti, da se zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti ne šteje za vloženo.
Where the fee has been paid after the expiry of the specified period, it shall be refunded to the applicant.
Če se pristojbina plača po izteku določenega roka, se povrne vložniku.
Where the application has been filed in a language which is not one of the languages of the Office as required under Article 146(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, or it does not comply with Article 12(1)(a) or (b) or, where applicable, Article 12(2)(a) or (b) of this Regulation, the Office shall reject the application as inadmissible.
Če se zahteva vloži v jeziku, ki ni eden od jezikov Urada, kakor to zahteva člen 146(5) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, oziroma če ni skladna s členom 12(1)(a) in (b) ali, če je to primerno, s členom 12(2)(a) ali (b) te uredbe, Urad zahtevo zavrže kot nedopustno.
Where the translation required under the second subparagraph of Article 146(7) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 is not filed within a period of one month of the date of filing an application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity, the Office shall reject the application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity as inadmissible.
Če se prevod, ki ga zahteva drugi pododstavek člena 146(7) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, ne vloži v roku enega meseca po vložitvi zahteve za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti, Urad zahtevo za razveljavitev ali razglasitev ničnosti zavrže kot nedopustno.
Where the application does not comply with the provisions laid down in Article 12(1)(c), Article 12(2)(c) or (d), the Office shall inform the applicant accordingly and shall invite the applicant to remedy the deficiencies noted within a period of two months.
Če zahteva ni v skladu z določbami iz členov 12(1)(c) ali 12(2)(c) ali (d), Urad vložnika o tem obvesti in ga pozove, naj v roku dveh mesecev odpravi ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti.
If the deficiencies are not remedied before the time limit expires, the Office shall reject the application as inadmissible.
Če se pomanjkljivosti ne odpravijo pred iztekom roka, Urad zahtevo zavrne kot nedopustno.
The Office shall notify the applicant and the proprietor of the EU trade mark of any finding pursuant to paragraph 1 that the application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity is deemed not to have been entered and of any decision to reject the application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity on the grounds of inadmissibility under paragraphs 2, 3 or 4.
Urad v skladu z odstavkom 1 vložnika in imetnika blagovne znamke EU obvesti o vsakem sklepu, da se šteje, da zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti ni bila vložena, in o vsaki odločbi, da se zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti v skladu z odstavkom 2, 3 ali 4 zaradi nedopustnosti zavrže.
Where an application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity is rejected in its entirety as inadmissible pursuant to paragraphs 2, 3 or 4, prior to the notification of Article 17(1), no decision on costs shall be taken.
Če se zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti v skladu z odstavki 2, 3 ali 4 v celoti zavrže kot nedopustna pred obvestilom iz člena 17(1), se ne sprejme noben sklep o stroških.
Substantiation of an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Utemeljitev zahteve za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti
The applicant shall present the facts, evidence and arguments in support of the application up to the closure of the adversarial part of revocation or invalidity proceedings.
Vložnik predstavlja dejstva, dokazila in navedbe za podkrepitev zahteve vse do zaključka kontradiktornega dela postopka za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti.
In particular, the applicant shall provide the following:
Vložnik predloži zlasti:
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 58(1)(b) or (c) or Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, facts, arguments and evidence to support the grounds on which the application for revocation or a declaration of invalidity is based;
v primeru zahteve na podlagi člena 58(1)(b) ali (c) ali člena 59 Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, dejstva, argumente in dokazila za podkrepitev razlogov, na katerih zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti temelji;
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 60(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the evidence required by Article 7(2) of this Regulation and the provisions of Article 7(3) shall apply mutatis mutandis;
v primeru zahteve na podlagi člena 60(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 se smiselno uporabljajo dokazila iz člena 7(2) te uredbe in določbe člena 7(3);
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 60(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, evidence of acquisition, continued existence and scope of protection of the relevant earlier right as well as evidence proving that the applicant is entitled to file the application, including, where the earlier right is invoked pursuant to the law of a Member State, a clear identification of the content of the national law relied upon by adducing publications of the relevant provisions or jurisprudence.
v primeru zahteve na podlagi člena 60(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, dokazila o pridobitvi, nadaljnjem obstoju in obsegu varstva ustrezne prejšnje pravice, dokazila o tem, da je vložnik upravičen do vložitve zahteve, ter, če ugovor temelji na prejšnji pravici v skladu s pravom države članice, tudi jasno navedbo vsebine nacionalnega prava, ki se uveljavlja, in sicer s predložitvijo uradnih objav zadevnih določb ali zakonodaje.
Where the evidence concerning the filing or registration of an earlier right under Article 60(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 or the evidence concerning the contents of the relevant national law is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, the applicant may provide such evidence by making reference to that source.
Če so dokazila o vložitvi ali registraciji prejšnje pravice na podlagi člena 60(2)(d) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 ali dokazila glede vsebine zadevne nacionalne zakonodaje dostopna prek spletnega vira, ki ga priznava Urad, lahko vložnik navede taka dokazila s sklicevanjem na ta vir.
Evidence concerning the filing, registration or renewal of earlier rights or, where applicable, the content of the relevant national law, including evidence accessible online, as referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c), shall be filed in the language of the proceedings or shall be accompanied by a translation into that language.
Dokazila o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju prejšnjih pravic oziroma če je primerno, vsebina zadevne nacionalne zakonodaje, vključno z dokazili, ki so dostopna na spletu, kot je navedeno v odstavkih 1(b) in (c), se vložijo v jeziku postopka ali jih spremlja prevod v ta jezik.
The translation shall be submitted by the applicant of the applicant's own motion within one month from the filing of such evidence.
Prevod na lastno pobudo predloži vložnik v roku enega meseca po vložitvi zadevnega dokazila.
Any other evidence submitted by the applicant to substantiate the application or, in case of an application for revocation under Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, by the proprietor of the contested EU trade mark, shall be subject to Article 24 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.
Za vsa druga dokazila, ki jih za utemeljevanje zahteve predloži vložnik oziroma imetnik izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU v primeru zahteve za razveljavitev v skladu s členom 58(1)(a) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, velja člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626.
Examination on the merits of an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Vsebinski preizkus zahteve za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti
Where the application is found admissible pursuant to Article 15, the Office shall send a communication to the parties informing them that the adversarial part of the revocation or invalidity proceedings has commenced and inviting the proprietor of the EU trade mark to file observations within a specified period.
Če je zahteva na podlagi člena 15 dopustna, Urad strankam pošlje sporočilo, s katerim jih obvesti, da se je kontradiktorni del postopka za razveljavitev ali razglasitev ničnosti pričel, in pozove imetnika blagovne znamke EU, naj v določenem roku vloži pripombe.
Where the Office has invited a party in accordance with Article 64(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 to file observations within a specified period and that party does not submit any observations within that period, the Office shall close the adversarial part of the proceedings and base its ruling on the revocation or invalidity on the basis of the evidence before it.
Če Urad v skladu s členom 64(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 stranko pozove k vložitvi pripomb v določenem roku, toda ta stranka v tem času ne vloži nobenih pripomb, Urad zaključi kontradiktorni del postopka in o razveljavitvi ali razglasitvi ničnosti presodi na podlagi razpoložljivih dokazil.
Where the applicant has not submitted the facts, arguments or evidence required to substantiate the application, the application shall be rejected as unfounded.
Če vložnik ni predložil potrebnih dejstev, dokazil in navedb za utemeljitev zahteve, se zahteva zavrže kot neutemeljena.
Without prejudice to Article 62, all observations filed by the parties shall be sent to the other party concerned.
Vse pripombe, ki so jih vložile stranke, se brez poseganja v člen 62 pošljejo drugi zadevni stranki.
Where the proprietor surrenders the EU trade mark subject to an application as referred to in Article 12 to cover only goods or services against which the application is not directed, or the EU trade mark is revoked or declared invalid in parallel proceedings, or expires, the proceedings shall be closed except where Article 57(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall apply or the applicant shows a legitimate interest in obtaining a decision on the merits.
Če se imetnik odpove blagovni znamki EU za katero je vložena zahteva iz člena 12, da bi zajemala samo blago in storitve, zoper katere zahteva ni vložena, oziroma se blagovna znamka EU razveljavi ali ugotovi za nično v vzporednem postopku ali izteče, se postopek zaključi, razen če se uporablja člen 57(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 oziroma vložnik izkaže upravičen interes do pridobitve sklepa na podlagi vsebine.
Where the proprietor partially surrenders the EU trade mark by deleting some of the goods or services against which the application is directed, the Office shall invite the applicant to state, within such a period as it may specify, whether it maintains the application and if so, against which of the remaining goods or services.
Če se imetnik delno odpove blagovni znamki EU s črtanjem nekaterega blaga in storitev, zoper katere je vložena zahteva, Urad pozove vložnika, da se v roku, ki mu ga določi, izjasni o tem, ali vztraja pri zahtevi in, če je tako, zoper katero preostalo blago in storitve.
Where the applicant withdraws the application in light of the surrender, or the Office is informed about a settlement between the parties, the proceedings shall be closed.
Če vložnik glede na odpoved umakne zahtevo ali če je Urad obveščen o tem, da sta stranki dosegli poravnavo, se postopek zaključi.
Where the proprietor wishes to surrender the contested EU trade mark, it shall do so by way of a separate document.
Če se želi imetnik odpovedati izpodbijani blagovni znamki EU, to stori z ločeno vlogo.
Article 8(9) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Smiselno se uporablja člen 8(9).
Multiple applications for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Več zahtev za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti
Where a number of applications for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity have been filed relating to the same EU trade mark, the Office may examine them in one set of proceedings.
Če se v zvezi z isto blagovno znamko EU vloži več zahtev za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti, jih Urad lahko preizkusi v enem samem postopku.
The Office may subsequently decide to examine those applications separately.
Urad se lahko kasneje odloči, da te zahteve preizkusi ločeno.
Article 9(2), (3) and (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Smiselno se uporablja člen 9(2), (3) in (4).
Proof of use in relation to an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
Dokaz o uporabi v zvezi z zahtevo za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti
In the case of an application for revocation based on Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Office shall invite the proprietor of the EU trade mark to provide proof of genuine use of that mark or of proper reasons for non-use, within such period as it shall specify.
V primeru zahteve za razveljavitev na podlagi člena 58(1)(a) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 Urad pozove imetnika blagovne znamke EU, naj predloži dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi znamke oziroma upravičene razloge za njeno neuporabo v roku, ki mu ga določi.
Where the proprietor does not provide any evidence of genuine use or of reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly irrelevant or manifestly insufficient, the EU trade mark shall be revoked.
Če imetnik pred iztekom roka ne predloži nobenega dokaza o resni in dejanski uporabi oziroma razlogov za neuporabo oziroma so dokazila ali podani razlogi neustrezni ali očitno nezadostni, se blagovna znamka EU razveljavi.
Article 10(3), (4), (6) and (7) of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Člen 10(3), (4), (6) in (7) te Uredbe se smiselno uporablja.
A request for proof of use pursuant to Article 64(2) or (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall be admissible if the proprietor of the EU trade mark submits it as an unconditional request in a separate document within the period specified by the Office pursuant to Article 17(1) of this Regulation.
Zahteva za dokaz o uporabi je na podlagi člena 64(2) ali (3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 dopustna, če jo imetnik blagovne znamke EU predloži v roku, ki ga na podlagi člena 17(1) te Uredbe določi Urad, kot brezpogojno zahtevo v ločeni vlogi.
Where the proprietor of the EU trade mark has made a request for proof of use of an earlier mark or of proper reasons for non-use which complies with the requirements of Article 64(2) or (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Office shall invite the applicant for a declaration of invalidity to provide the proof required within a time limit specified by the Office.
Če je imetnik blagovne znamke EU v skladu s členom 64(2) ali (3) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 zahteval dokaz o uporabi prejšnje znamke ali o upravičenih razlogih za njeno neuporabo, Urad vložnika zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti pozove, naj predloži zadevne dokaze v roku, ki mu ga določi.
Where the applicant for a declaration of invalidity does not provide any evidence of genuine use or of reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly irrelevant or manifestly insufficient, the Office shall reject the application for a declaration of invalidity in so far as it is based on that earlier mark.
Če vložnik zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti pred iztekom roka ne predloži nobenih dokazov o resni in dejanski uporabi ali razlogov za neuporabo oziroma so predložena dokazila oziroma razlogi neustrezni ali očitno nezadostni, Urad zahtevo za ugotovitev ničnosti zavrže v delu, ki zadeva to prejšnjo znamko.
Article 10(3) to (7) of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Člen 10(3) do (7) te Uredbe se smiselno uporablja.
Request for assignment
Zahteva za prenos
Where the proprietor of a trade mark requests, in accordance with Article 21(1) and (2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, an assignment instead of a declaration of invalidity, the provisions of Articles 12 to 19 of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Če imetnik blagovne znamke v skladu s členom 21(1) in (2)(a) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 namesto ugotovitve ničnosti zahteva prenos, se smiselno uporabljajo določbe členov 12 do 19 te Uredbe.
Where a request for assignment pursuant to Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 is partially or totally granted by the Office or by an EU trade mark court and the decision or judgment has become final, the Office shall ensure that the resulting partial or total transfer of the EU trade mark is entered in the Register and published.
Če Urad ali sodišče za blagovne znamke EU v skladu s členom 21(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 deloma ali popolnoma ugodi zahtevi za prenos in odločba ali sodba postane dokončna, Urad zagotovi, da je posledični delni ali popolni prenos blagovne znamke EU vpisan v register ter objavljen.
TITLE V
NASLOV V
A notice of appeal filed in accordance with Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall contain the following:
Obvestilo o pritožbi, ki se vloži v skladu s členom 68(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, vsebuje:
the name and address of the appellant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;
ime in naslov pritožnika v skladu s členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626;
where the appellant has appointed a representative, the name and the business address of the representative in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;
če je pritožnik imenoval zastopnika, ime in službeni naslov zastopnika v skladu s členom 2(1)(e) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626;
where representation of the appellant is mandatory pursuant to Article 119(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the name and the business address of the representative in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;
če je zastopništvo pritožnika v skladu s členom 119(2) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001 obvezno, ime in službeni naslov zastopnika v skladu s členom 2(1)(e) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2018/626;
a clear and unambiguous identification of the decision subject to appeal indicating the date on which it was issued and the file number of the proceedings to which the decision subject to appeal relates;
jasno in nedvoumno opredelitev odločbe, ki je predmet pritožbe, navedbo datuma njene izdaje in številko spisa postopka, na katerega se ta odločba nanaša;
where the decision subject to appeal is only contested in part, a clear and unambiguous identification of the goods or services in respect of which the decision subject to appeal is contested.
če je odločba, ki je predmet pritožbe, izpodbijana le delno, jasno in nedvoumno opredelitev blaga ali storitev, v zvezi s katerimi se ta odločba izpodbija.
Where the notice of appeal is filed in another official language of the Union than the language of proceedings, the appellant shall provide a translation thereof within four months of the date of notification of the decision subject to appeal.
Če se obvestilo o pritožbi vloži v drugem uradnem jeziku Unije, ki ni jezik postopka, pritožnik zagotovi prevod v roku štirih mesecev po vročitvi odločbe, ki je predmet pritožbe.
Where in ex parte proceedings the decision subject to appeal has been taken in an official language other than the language of proceedings, the appellant may file the notice of appeal either in the language of the proceedings or in the language in which the decision subject to appeal was taken; in either case, the language used for the notice of appeal shall become the language of the appeal proceedings and paragraph 2 shall not apply.
Če se je odločba, ki je predmet pritožbe, v postopku ex parte izdala v drugem uradnem jeziku, ki ni jezik postopka, lahko pritožnik obvestilo o pritožbi vloži bodisi v jeziku postopka ali v jeziku, v katerem se je odločba, ki je predmet pritožbe, izdala; v katerem koli primeru jezik obvestila o pritožbi postane jezik pritožbenega postopka, odstavek 2 pa se ne uporablja.
As soon as the notice of appeal has been filed in inter partes proceedings, it shall be notified to the defendant.
Obvestilo o pritožbi se takoj, ko se vloži v postopku inter partes, vroči toženi stranki.
Statement of grounds
Izjava z razlogi za pritožbo
A statement setting out the grounds of appeal filed pursuant to the fourth sentence of Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall contain a clear and unambiguous identification of the following:
Izjava z vzroki za pritožbo, vložena na podlagi četrtega stavka člena 68(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001, vsebuje jasno in nedvoumno opredelitev:
the appeal proceedings to which it refers by indicating either the corresponding appeal number or the decision subject to appeal in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 21(1)(d) of this Regulation;
zadevnega pritožbenega postopka, ki je razviden iz bodisi ustrezne številke pritožbe ali odločbe, ki je predmet pritožbe, v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 21(1)(d) te uredbe;
the grounds of appeal on which the annulment of the contested decision is requested within the extent identified in accordance with Article 21(1)(e) of this Regulation;
vzrokov za pritožbo, na katerih temelji zahteva za razveljavitev izpodbijane odločbe v obsegu, ki je določen v skladu s členom 21(1)(e) te uredbe;
the facts, evidence and arguments in support of the grounds invoked, submitted in accordance with the requirements set out in Article 55(2).
dejstev, dokazil in navedb za podkrepitev navedenih vzrokov, predloženih v skladu z določbami člena 55(2).
The statement of grounds shall be filed in the language of the appeal proceedings as determined in accordance with Article 21(2) and (3).
Izjava z razlogi se vloži v jeziku pritožbenega postopka, kot je določeno v skladu s členom 21(2) in (3).
Where the statement of grounds is filed in another official language of the Union, the appellant shall provide a translation thereof within one month of the date of the submission of the original statement.
Če se izjava z razlogi vloži v drugem uradnem jeziku Unije, pritožnik predloži njen prevod v roku enega meseca po predložitvi izvirnika.
Admissibility of an appeal
Dopustnost pritožbe
The Board of Appeal shall reject an appeal as inadmissible in any of the following events:
Odbor za pritožbe zavrže pritožbo kot nedopustno, če: