natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This will not be affected by the checks that the Commission conducts pursuant to Article 11(8) of the Regulation into whether the declaration of an emergency by the Member State requesting solidarity was justified and the measures taken to execute the actions listed in the emergency plan.
Na to ne vplivajo preverjanja, ki jih Komisija opravi v skladu s členom 11(8) uredbe v zvezi s tem, ali je razglasitev izrednih razmer v državi članici, ki je zaprosila za solidarnostno pomoč, upravičena in ali so bili sprejeti ukrepi, ki ustrezajo tistim iz načrta za izredne razmere.
The Commission has 5 days to carry out this verification procedure.
Komisija ima za izvedbo teh preverjanj na voljo pet dni.
It is unlikely that a Member State will request solidarity less than 5 days after declaring an emergency, since it will usually take some time for problems with the gas supply to reach a level that justifies making such a request.
Država članica za solidarnostno pomoč verjetno ne bo zaprosila v manj kot petih dneh po razglasitvi izrednih razmer, ker je običajno potrebno nekaj časa, da težave z oskrbo s plinom dosežejo raven, pri kateri je taka prošnja utemeljena.
Should it do so, the Commission's checks into the justification for declaring an emergency will still be underway.
In tudi če bi, bi Komisija kljub temu izvedla preverjanja glede upravičenosti razglasitve izrednih razmer.
However, any such ongoing verification should not impact the validity of the solidarity request.
Vendar kakršna koli začeta preverjanja ne bi smela vplivati na veljavnost prošnje za solidarnostno pomoč.
The risk of misuse of the solidarity mechanism with an unjustified solidarity request is very limited, because of the far-reaching consequences and the strict conditions that must be fulfilled before the solidarity mechanism is triggered, namely:
Tveganje zlorabe solidarnostnega mehanizma z neupravičeno prošnjo za solidarnostno pomoč je zelo omejeno zaradi daljnosežnih posledic in strogih pogojev, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni za sprožitev solidarnostnega mehanizma, in sicer:
application of all emergency measures provided for in the emergency plan, and
sprejetje vseh ukrepov v izrednih razmerah iz načrta za izredne razmere in
curtailment of customers without solidarity protection in the Member State requesting solidarity.
zmanjševanje dobave odjemalcem brez solidarnostne zaščite v državi članici, ki je zaprosila za solidarnostno pomoč.
Should the Commission's checks come to the conclusion that a request for solidarity was not justified, the Member State that issued the unjustified request and received help from directly connected neighbours will pay for the gas received, together with additional costs to the Member States that provided help.
Če Komisija na podlagi preverjanj sklene, da prošnja za solidarnostno pomoč ni bila upravičena, država članica, ki je predložila to neupravičeno prošnjo in prejela pomoč od neposredno povezanih sosednjih držav, državam članicam, ki so zagotovile pomoč, plača prejeto količino plina in dodatne stroške.
The obligation to provide solidarity ceases to apply when:
Obveznost zagotavljanja solidarnostne pomoči preneha veljati, če:
after a verification procedure, the Commission concludes that declaring an emergency is no longer justified,
Komisija po izvedbi preverjanj sklene, da razglasitev izrednih razmer ni več upravičena,
the Member State that requested solidarity informs the Member States providing solidarity that it is again in a position to supply gas to its domestic solidarity-protected customers, and
država članica, ki je zaprosila za solidarnostno pomoč, obvesti državo članico, ki zagotavlja solidarnostno pomoč, da lahko svoje domače solidarnostno zaščitene odjemalce ponovno oskrbuje s plinom, in
the Member State providing solidarity can no longer supply its own solidarity-protected customers.
država članica, ki zagotavlja solidarnostno pomoč, ne more več oskrbovati svojih solidarnostno zaščitenih odjemalcev.
It is also possible that, despite an ongoing acute gas crisis at home, the Member State that initially requested solidarity decides to renounce its right to request such solidarity — because it cannot afford to pay, for instance.
Prav tako se lahko država članica, ki je najprej zaprosila za solidarnostno pomoč, kljub hudi plinski krizi doma odloči, da se bo odpovedala svoji pravici do te pomoči – ker je na primer ne more plačati.
Member States should take ultimate responsibility for running the solidarity mechanism.
Države članice bi morale prevzeti končno odgovornost za izvajanje solidarnostnega mehanizma.
This includes in particular the decision to request solidarity and the overall monitoring of how the entities responsible for specific tasks are operating the mechanism.
To zadeva zlasti odločitev glede prošnje za solidarnostno pomoč in splošno spremljanje subjektov, odgovornih za posebne naloge, pri izvajanju mehanizma.
The Regulation does not require the creation of new specific entities.
Uredba ne vključuje zahteve glede ustanavljanja novih posebnih subjektov.
Preferably, Member States are advised to allocate responsibilities to existing entities or, in special circumstances, to new entities, taking account of their organisational structure and experience in crisis management and emergency response.
Državam članicam se svetuje, naj odgovornosti dodelijo obstoječim subjektom ali v posebnih okoliščinah novim subjektom, ob čemer upoštevajo njihovo organizacijsko strukturo ter izkušnje v zvezi z obvladovanjem krize in odzivanjem v izrednih razmerah.
In order to reduce costs, and particularly to avoid fix costs, Member States could, rely on existing mechanisms where possible.
Da bi se zmanjšali stroški in zlasti preprečili fiksni stroški, bi se lahko države članice oprle na obstoječe mehanizme, če je to mogoče.
The guiding principle in this respect should be providing solidarity efficiently and effectively.
V zvezi s tem bi moralo biti vodilno načelo učinkovito in uspešno zagotavljanje solidarnosti.
The competent authorities under the Regulation would be responsible for implementing the framework, with tasks and responsibilities clearly assigned to the respective actors such as the TSOs, the national regulatory authority and gas undertakings.
Pristojni organi v skladu z uredbo bi bili odgovorni za izvajanje okvira, pri čemer bi bile naloge in odgovornosti jasno dodeljene zadevnim akterjem, kot so operaterji prenosnih sistemov, nacionalni regulativni organ in podjetja plinskega gospodarstva.
The competent authorities are also best placed to prepare the bilateral arrangements with competent authorities in the directly connected Member States.
Poleg tega so pristojni organi najprimernejši za pripravo dvostranskih dogovorov s pristojnimi organi v neposredno povezanih državah članicah.
These could later form the legal basis for the solidarity, including payment of compensation and financial settlements after solidarity has been provided.
Ti dogovori bi se lahko pozneje uporabili kot pravna podlaga za solidarnostno pomoč, vključno s plačilom nadomestila in finančnimi poravnavami po zagotovitvi solidarnostne pomoči.
Member States or competent authorities are also best placed to be in charge of sending or receiving requests for solidarity, offers for gas volumes and providing a notification when the solidarity application has been suspended.
Države članice ali pristojni organi so tudi najprimernejši, da bi prevzeli pristojnost za pošiljanje ali prejemanje prošenj za solidarnostno pomoč in ponudb za količine plina ter obveščanje v primeru odložitve izvajanja solidarnostne pomoči.
The financial responsibility related to compensation should ultimately also lie with the Member State.
Finančno odgovornost v zvezi z nadomestilom bi bilo v končni fazi prav tako treba dodeliti državi članici.
Subject to the technical and legal constraints in each Member State, national regulatory authorities are best placed to lead or at least be involved in the process of calculating compensation costs on the basis of a methodology that they have developed beforehand and published in the emergency plan.
Ob upoštevanju tehničnih in pravnih omejitev v posamezni državi članici so nacionalni regulativni organi najprimernejši za vodenje izračuna stroškov nadomestila ali vsaj sodelovanje pri tem izračunu na podlagi metodologije, ki so jo predhodno razvili in objavili v načrtu za izredne razmere.
The Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators could be involved in this process.
Pri tem izračunu bi lahko sodelovala agencija za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev.
The TSOs should preferably be in charge of dispatching the necessary gas volumes, and do so in a cost-efficient manner.
Operaterji prenosnih sistemov bi morali biti po možnosti odgovorni za pošiljanje potrebnih količin plina na stroškovno učinkovit način.
The TSOs (or a balancing entity) are best placed to take responsibility for coordinating all technical aspects and implementing all necessary operational measures when solidarity is applied.
Ti operaterji (ali izravnalni subjekt) so najprimernejši za prevzem odgovornosti za usklajevanje vseh tehničnih vidikov in izvajanje vseh potrebnih operativnih ukrepov pri uporabi solidarnostne pomoči.
The respective entity in the Member State that provides solidarity could also be the entity in charge of collecting claims for gas and the additional costs, verifying them and channelling them to the entity in charge in the Member State that benefits from solidarity.
Zadevni subjekt v državi članici, ki zagotavlja solidarnostno pomoč, bi lahko bil odgovoren tudi za zbiranje zahtevkov za plin in dodatne stroške, pri čemer bi te zahtevke preverjal in jih posredoval odgovornemu subjektu v državi članici, ki prejema solidarnostno pomoč.
In this context, a one-stop-shop approach would be useful.
V zvezi s tem bi bil koristen pristop „vse na enem mestu“.
The Member States are advised to identify and agree on the entity in charge of collecting and channelling claims for compensation for curtailment.
Državam članicam se svetuje, naj subjekt, ki bo odgovoren za zbiranje in posredovanje zahtevkov za nadomestilo v zvezi z omejevanjem oskrbe, opredelijo in se o njem dogovorijo.
Making provision for a mediator in the bilateral arrangements concluded between Member States might reassure both of them about the payment and calculation of compensation costs.
Določitev posrednika v dvostranskih dogovorih med državami članicami bi lahko obe strani pomirila glede plačila in izračuna stroškov nadomestila.
The mediator would help to solve any disagreement about the amount of the compensation to be paid.
Posrednik bi pomagal rešiti morebitni spor glede zneska nadomestila, ki ga je treba plačati.
Legal form of the bilateral arrangements
Pravna oblika dvostranskih dogovorov
There is no explicit requirement with regard to the legal form of the bilateral arrangements.
Pravna oblika dvostranskih dogovorov ni izrecno določena.
The Member States are free to find a legal form that creates rights and obligations between them if the solidarity mechanism is applied.
Države članice lahko same izberejo pravno obliko, s katero določijo medsebojne pravice in obveznosti v primeru uporabe solidarnostnega mehanizma.
The right to request solidarity and the obligation to provide solidarity are laid down in Article 13 of the Regulation.
Pravica do prošnje za solidarnostno pomoč in obveznost zagotavljanja te pomoči sta določeni v členu 13 uredbe.
The bilateral arrangements will define how these rights and obligations established in Union law are to be exercised.
V dvostranskih dogovorih je opredeljeno, kako se izvajajo te pravice in obveznosti, določene v pravu Unije.
The arrangements will be operational, not political in nature.
Dogovori so po naravi operativni, ne politični.
On the face of it, for implementation purposes it may be enough for the relevant authorities to conclude a binding administrative arrangement.
Na prvi pogled je za namene izvajanja morda dovolj, da zadevni organi sklenejo zavezujoč upravni dogovor.
This might include existing bilateral treaty provisions, contractual arrangements between TSOs or specific licensing conditions for gas entities, provided they are overseen by the relevant competent authorities.
Ta lahko vključuje določbe obstoječe dvostranske pogodbe, pogodbene dogovore med operaterji prenosnih sistemov ali posebne pogoje licenciranja za subjekte plinskega gospodarstva, če jih nadzirajo zadevni pristojni organi.
On the other hand, a non-binding legal instrument such as a memorandum of understanding would not be sufficient, as it does not create legal obligations between the participants.
Nezavezujoč pravni instrument, na primer memorandum o soglasju, pa ne bi zadostoval, saj ne ustvarja pravnih obveznosti med udeleženci.
Arrangements in the form of a memorandum would therefore fall short of the requirements of Article 13 to create a legally binding system for solidarity, and could be interpreted as insufficient implementation of Article 13(10).
Dogovori v obliki memoranduma torej ne bi vključevali zahtev v skladu s členom 13, s katerimi bi se vzpostavil pravno zavezujoč sistem solidarnosti, in bi se lahko razlagali kot neustrezno izvajanje člena 13(10).
Technical arrangements
Tehnični dogovori
The purpose of the technical arrangements is to describe all necessary technical provisions and conditions that would enable the solidarity mechanism to work in practice.
Namen tehničnih dogovorov je opredeliti vse potrebne tehnične določbe in pogoje, ki bi omogočili delovanje solidarnostnega mehanizma v praksi.
This would require compulsory prior sharing of information about the technical capability and constraints of the relevant gas infrastructure and the maximum theoretical volumes of gas relevant for solidarity, together with the certainty that there are no undue technical constraints that would make solidarity difficult.
V ta namen bi bila potrebna obvezna predhodna izmenjava informacij o tehničnih zmogljivostih in omejitvah zadevne plinske infrastrukture ter največjih teoretičnih količinah plina, potrebnih za solidarnost, skupaj z gotovostjo, da ni nobenih neupravičenih tehničnih omejitev, ki bi otežile solidarnost.
If technical or other constraints exist, Member States are encouraged to identify and agree on mutually acceptable solutions to be applied at interconnection points if the solidarity mechanism is triggered.
V primeru tehničnih in drugih omejitev so države članice spodbujene, naj opredelijo in sporazumno določijo vzajemno sprejemljive rešitve, ki se bodo uporabile na povezovalnih točkah ob sprožitvi solidarnostnega mehanizma.
Depending on the technical constraints within each Member State, it may be that the TSOs (or a balancing entity) are best placed to take responsibility for coordinating all technical aspects and implementing all necessary operational measures when solidarity is applied, based on their knowledge of the gas systems and their existing cross-border cooperation schemes.
Glede na tehnične omejitve v posamezni državi članici so operaterji prenosnih sistemov (ali izravnalni subjekt) zaradi poznavanja plinskih sistemov in njihovih obstoječih shem čezmejnega sodelovanja morda najprimernejši, da prevzamejo odgovornost za usklajevanje vseh tehničnih vidikov in izvajanje vseh potrebnih operativnih ukrepov pri uporabi solidarnostne pomoči.
These existing cooperation structures, agreements and experience should be taken into account in, or even serve as a basis for solidarity situations.
Te obstoječe strukture sodelovanja, dogovore in izkušnje bi bilo treba upoštevati pri izvajanju solidarnosti ali jih celo uporabiti kot podlago za primere solidarnostne pomoči.
In any case, a clear overarching framework must be identified (if already in place) or established, including the technical conditions, so that the necessary cooperation can be undertaken with legal certainty.
V vsakem primeru je treba opredeliti (če je že vzpostavljen) ali vzpostaviti jasen krovni okvir, vključno s tehničnimi pogoji, da bi se pri izvajanju potrebnega sodelovanja lahko zagotovila pravna varnost.
Technical data can be updated as necessary in the plans.
Tehnični podatki v načrtih se lahko po potrebi posodobijo.
Technical solutions and coordination (Article 13(10)(c))
Tehnične rešitve in usklajevanje (člen 13(10)(c))
Technical solutions and arrangements can be made for the various parts of the infrastructure in a given Member State.
Tehnične rešitve in dogovori se lahko zagotovijo za različne dele infrastrukture v določeni državi članici.
This will provide a clear picture of the assistance available, the technical constraints involved and a better estimation of the costs of implementing each measure (if relevant).
S tem se omogoči jasna slika razpoložljive pomoči in obstoječih tehničnih omejitev ter boljša ocena stroškov izvajanja posameznega ukrepa (če je ustrezno).
As potential crisis situations can be very different, it is important that TSOs (or a balancing entity) are left with a wide range of options and tools to draw on.
Ker so morebitne krizne razmere lahko zelo različne, je pomembno, da imajo operaterji prenosnih sistemov (ali izravnalni subjekt) na voljo veliko različnih možnosti in orodij.
An indicative and non-exhaustive list of technical solutions can be described in the technical arrangements, so that both parties are aware of the steps that might be taken before and during an emergency for solidarity purposes.
V tehničnih dogovorih se lahko opredeli okviren in neizčrpen seznam tehničnih rešitev, tako da sta obe strani seznanjeni z ukrepi, ki bi se lahko sprejeli za namene solidarnosti pred in med izrednimi razmerami.
Hydraulic simulations of solidarity measures may be beneficial for the preparedness for such situations.
Hidravlične simulacije solidarnostnih ukrepov so lahko koristne za pripravljenost na take razmere.
There will have to be coordination across the relevant TSOs or market area managers, distribution system operators (DSOs), national emergency coordinators, competent authorities and entities involved in delivering the gas to the solidarity-protected customers.
Potrebno bo usklajevanje med zadevnimi operaterji prenosnih sistemov ali upravljavci področja trga, operaterji distribucijskih sistemov, nacionalnimi koordinatorji v izrednih razmerah ter pristojnimi organi in subjekti, ki so vključeni v oskrbo solidarnostno zaščitenih odjemalcev s plinom.
This will mean that gas from demand reduction in one Member State can be made available and supplied to a directly connected Member State requesting solidarity.
To bo pomenilo, da se lahko plin, pridobljen v okviru zmanjšanja povpraševanja v eni državi članici, da na voljo in dobavi neposredno povezani državi članici, ki je zaprosila za solidarnostno pomoč.
TSOs, DSOs, national emergency coordinators and other entities involved in the delivery of gas to solidarity-protected customers should be involved early enough in the discussions on solidarity provisions and possibly tasked to work together to execute the solidarity arrangements.
Operaterji prenosnih sistemov, operaterji distribucijskih sistemov, nacionalni koordinatorji v izrednih razmerah in drugi subjekti, ki so vključeni v oskrbo solidarnostno zaščitenih odjemalcev s plinom, bi se morali dovolj zgodaj vključiti v razprave o določbah v zvezi s solidarnostjo in po možnosti sodelovati pri izvajanju solidarnostnih dogovorov.
TSOs should also be entitled to utilise unused transmission capacity, whether allocated or not.
Poleg tega bi morali biti operaterji prenosnih sistemov upravičeni do uporabe neizkoriščene prenosne zmogljivosti, ne glede na to, ali jim je dodeljena ali ne.
In any event compensation for the cost of transmission should be paid according to agreed principles.
V vsakem primeru bi bilo treba nadomestilo za stroške prenosa plačati v skladu z dogovorjenimi načeli.
Access to hubs and other platforms should be maintained for as long as possible, even in an emergency (Article 13(4) of the Regulation) to prevent the need to trigger solidarity.
Dostop do vozlišč in drugih platform bi bilo treba ohranjati čim dlje, tudi med izrednimi razmerami (člen 13(4) uredbe), da bi se preprečila potreba po sprožitvi solidarnostne pomoči.
Therefore, there must be constant access to LNG terminals, storage and interconnection capacity, including bi-directional capacity, to allow efficient cross-border flows (Article 13(10)(c)).
Zato je treba zagotoviti stalen dostop do terminalov za UZP ter zmogljivosti skladiščenja in medsebojnih povezav, vključno z dvosmerno zmogljivostjo, da bi se omogočil učinkovit čezmejni pretok (člen 13(10)(c)).
These aspects should be explicitly tackled in the arrangements.
Te vidike bi bilo treba izrecno obravnavati v dogovorih.
Gas volumes or the methodology for setting them (Article 13(10)(d) of the Regulation)
Količine plina ali metodologija za njihovo določanje (člen 13(10)(d) uredbe)
Member States should inform neighbouring Member States (i.e. potential providers of solidarity) about the theoretical maximum gas volumes they may request and the limit on interconnector capacity, for the sake of transparency and as a basis for the discussions on the arrangements.
Države članice bi morale zaradi preglednosti in kot podlago za razprave o dogovorih sosednje države članice (tj. potencialne ponudnice solidarnostne pomoči) obvestiti o teoretičnih največjih količinah plina, za katere lahko zaprosijo, in omejitvi povezovalnih zmogljivosti.
Nevertheless, the exact gas volumes needed, requested and available will be only known when solidarity is triggered.
Vendar pa bodo točne potrebne, zahtevane in razpoložljive količine plina znane šele ob sprožitvi solidarnostne pomoči.
For the calculation of these theoretical maximum gas volumes, the following elements should be taken into consideration as a minimum:
Za izračun teh teoretičnih največjih količin plina je treba upoštevati vsaj naslednje elemente:
the solidarity-protected customers concerned,
zadevne solidarnostno zaščitene odjemalce,
the critical gas-fired power plants concerned (where applicable) and their associated gas volumes, and
zadevne ključne plinske elektrarne (če je ustrezno) in z njimi povezane količine plina in
domestic gas production in the producing Member States.
domačo proizvodnjo plina v državi članici proizvajalki.
The supply standard scenarios adapted to solidarity-protected customers could act as a good starting point for this calculation.
Dobra izhodiščna točka za ta izračun bi lahko bili standardni scenariji oskrbe, prilagojeni solidarnostno zaščitenim odjemalcem.
All Member States have to identify their solidarity-protected customers using the definition provided for in Article 2(6) of the Regulation and their annual gas consumption (average and peak).
Vse države članice morajo opredeliti svoje solidarnostno zaščitene odjemalce na podlagi opredelitve iz člena 2(6) uredbe in njihovo letno porabo plina (povprečno in najvišjo).
The critical gas-fired power plants and associated annual gas volumes (Article 13(1), second subparagraph of the Regulation) may have an important impact on the gas volumes available for solidarity.
Ključne plinske elektrarne in z njimi povezane letne količine plina (drugi pododstavek člena 13(1) uredbe) lahko pomembno vplivajo na količine plina, ki so na voljo za solidarnostno pomoč.
In the Member State providing solidarity, such gas volumes limit the amount potentially available for solidarity; in some receiving Member States the critical gas-fired power plants are prioritised over solidarity-protected customers, but the gas volumes necessary for their operation have no impact on the volumes that may be required.
V državi članici, ki zagotavlja solidarnostno pomoč, te količine plina omejujejo količino, ki bi lahko bila na voljo za solidarnostne namene; v nekaterih državah članicah prejemnicah imajo ključne plinske elektrarne prednost pred solidarnostno zaščitenimi odjemalci, vendar količine plina, ki so potrebne za njihovo obratovanje, ne vplivajo na količine, ki bi morda bile potrebne.