natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission received a notice of opposition from Finland, a second one from Denmark and a third one from Nordic Sugar AB (company established in Denmark) all on 16 September 2014.
Komisija je 16. septembra 2014 prejela tri ugovore, in sicer Finske, Danske in družbe Nordic Sugar AB (s sedežem na Danskem).
The notices of opposition from Denmark and Finland were forwarded to the Netherlands.
Ugovora Danske in Finske sta bila posredovana Nizozemski.
The opposition procedure based on the notice sent directly to the Commission by Nordic Sugar AB was not initiated.
Postopek ugovora na osnovi obvestila, ki ga je družba Nordic Sugar AB poslala neposredno Komisiji, ni bil sprožen.
According to Article 51(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, natural or legal persons having a legitimate interest, established or resident in a Member State other than that from which the application was submitted, may lodge a notice of opposition with the Member State in which it is established.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 51(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 lahko vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s pravnim interesom in s prebivališčem ali sedežem v državi članici, ki ni država, iz katere je bil zahtevek posredovan, vloži ugovor pri državi članici, v kateri ima sedež.
Therefore, Nordic Sugar AB was not allowed to lodge a notice or a statement of opposition directly to the Commission.
Zato družba Nordic Sugar AB ugovora ali izjave o ugovoru ne bi smela vložiti neposredno pri Komisiji.
On 13 November 2014 the Commission received the reasoned statements of opposition from Finland.
Komisija je 13. novembra 2014 prejela utemeljeni ugovor Finske.
The reasoned statement of opposition from Denmark was already contained in the notice of opposition.
Utemeljeni ugovor Danske je bil vključen že v sam ugovor.
Both the reasoned statement of opposition from Denmark and the one from Finland were considered admissible within the meaning of Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
Za utemeljena ugovora Danske in Finske je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta dopustna v smislu člena 21 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
Pursuant to Article 51(3) of the above Regulation, by letters of 19 December 2014 the Commission invited the Netherlands and Finland on one hand, and the Netherlands and Denmark on the other hand, to engage in appropriate consultations for a period of three months from the date of these letters in view of reaching an agreement.
V skladu s členom 51(3) navedene uredbe je Komisija z dopisi z dne 19. decembra 2014 Nizozemsko in Finsko na eni strani ter Nizozemsko in Dansko na drugi strani pozvala k ustreznim posvetovanjem v obdobju treh mesecev od datuma navedenih dopisov, da bi dosegle dogovor.
Upon request of the Netherlands, in accordance with Article 51(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, by letter of 8 April 2015 the Commission granted an extension of the deadline for the consultations among the interested parties in the two opposition procedures concerning the above mentioned application.
Na zahtevo Nizozemske je Komisija z dopisom z dne 8. aprila 2015 v skladu s členom 51(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 odobrila podaljšanje roka za posvetovanja med zainteresiranimi stranmi v dveh postopkih ugovora v zvezi z zgoraj navedenim zahtevkom.
The final deadline for the amicable procedure was therefore extended until 19 June 2015.
Rok za sporazumni dogovor je bil torej podaljšan do 19. junija 2015.
No agreement was reached within the designated timeframe.
Dogovor v določenem roku ni bil dosežen.
By letter of 22 February 2017 the Netherlands sent the Commission the results of the consultations with Finland and Denmark.
Nizozemska je Komisiji z dopisom z dne 22. februarja 2017 poslala rezultate posvetovanja s Finsko in Dansko.
In their reasoned statement of opposition, Finland and Denmark claimed that: 1) the name is not specific (it means just syrup of sugar); 2) identical name is used for several similar products already existing in the Danish, Swedish, Finnish, German and Baltic markets; 3) the product characteristics and its production method are not unique to the product since similar products, marketed in Denmark, Finland and Sweden, have the same specific characteristics and methods.
V utemeljenem ugovoru sta Finska in Danska trdili, da: 1) ime ni specifično (enostavno pomeni sladkorni sirup); 2) se identično ime uporablja za več podobnih proizvodov, ki že obstajajo na danskem, švedskem, finskem, nemškem in baltskem trgu; 3) značilnosti proizvoda in njegova proizvodna metoda niso edinstvene, saj za podobne proizvode, ki se tržijo na Danskem, Finskem in Švedskem, veljajo enake posebne značilnosti in metode.
In particular, Finland considers that the product as described in the application cannot be considered to be ‘special’ as a type of syrup since products other than the ‘Suikerstroop’ are also made of 100 % sugar beet or sugar cane.
Zlasti Finska meni, da proizvod, kot je opisan v zahtevku, kot vrsta sirupa ne more veljati za „posebnega“, saj poleg sirupa „Suikerstroop“ obstajajo tudi drugi proizvodi, ki so 100-odstotno izdelani iz sladkorne pese ali sladkornega trsa.
In addition, Denmark claimed that point 3.1 of the product specification, providing that ‘the words “traditional Dutch product” will appear on the label in the language of the country in which the product is marketed’ should be reformulated to comply with Article 18(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
Danska je poleg tega navedla, da bi bilo treba točko 3.1 specifikacije proizvoda, ki določa, da „je na etiketi navedba“ tradicionalen nizozemski proizvod „v jeziku države, v kateri se proizvod trži“, preoblikovati in uskladiti s členom 18(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
On the other side, Finland challenged the use of the definition ‘traditional Dutch product’ as not specific to the product described in the application since similar products marketed in northern Europe can also be qualified as traditional.
Po drugi strani je Finska opozorila, da uporaba opredelitve „tradicionalni nizozemski proizvod“ ni specifična za proizvod iz zahtevka, saj se v severni Evropi tržijo podobni proizvodi, ki se prav tako lahko opredelijo kot tradicionalni.
Finland has subsequently requested, during the consultations with the Netherlands, to delete the last sentence of Section 3.2 ‘There are no other products of the same name or similar products with a similar-sounding name’ because it would be incorrect.
Finska je nato med posvetovanji z Nizozemsko zahtevala črtanje zadnjega stavka oddelka 3.2 „Drugi proizvodi z enakim imenom ali podobni proizvodi s podobno zvenečim imenom ne obstajajo“, saj bi bila ta trditev napačna.
The Commission has assessed the arguments provided in the reasoned statements of opposition and in the information provided to the Commission regarding the negotiations between the interested parties and it has concluded that the name ‘Suikerstroop’ should be registered as TSG.
Komisija je obravnavala argumente iz utemeljenih ugovorov in informacij, predloženih Komisiji v zvezi s pogajanji med zainteresiranimi stranmi, ter je sklenila, da bi bilo treba ime „Suikerstroop“ registrirati kot ZTP.
The oppositions are based on both points (a) and (b) of Article 21(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
Ugovori temeljijo na točkah (a) in (b) člena 21(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
As regards the incompatibility with the terms of the Regulation, three points have been raised: 1) the name is not specific; 2) the product characteristics and its production method is not unique 3) point 3.1 of the product specification does not comply with Article 18(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 insofar as it refers to a ‘traditional Dutch product’.
Glede neskladnosti s pogoji Uredbe so bile izpostavljene tri točke: 1) ime ni specifično; 2) značilnosti proizvoda in metoda njegove proizvodnje niso edinstvene; 3) točka 3.1 specifikacije proizvoda se nanaša na „tradicionalen nizozemski proizvod“, zato ni v skladu s členom 18(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
As regards the circumstance that the name is lawful, renowned and economically significant for similar agricultural products and foodstuffs, one point has been raised: an identical name is used for several similar products already existing in the Danish, Swedish, Finnish, German and Baltic markets.
Glede okoliščine, da je ime za podobne kmetijske proizvode ali živila zakonito, splošno znano in gospodarsko pomembno, je bilo izpostavljeno, da se identično ime uporablja za več podobnih proizvodov, ki že obstajajo na danskem, švedskem, finskem, nemškem in baltskem trgu.
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 does not require a TSG name to be specific.
Uredba (EU) št. 1151/2012 ne določa, da mora biti ime zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti specifično.
This was required under Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 [3].
To je določal člen 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 509/2006.
Although the application was submitted to the Commission when Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 was into force, it was then published under Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 and, therefore, in the absence of specific transitional provisions, the latter Regulation applies.
Čeprav je bil zahtevek Komisiji predložen, ko je veljala Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 509/2006 [3], je bil objavljen na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, zato se ob odsotnosti posebnih prehodnih določb uporablja slednja.
In accordance with Article 18(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 a name is eligible for TSG if it has been traditionally used to refer to the specific product or if it identifies the traditional or specific character of the product.
V skladu s členom 18(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 se lahko ime registrira kot zajamčena tradicionalna posebnost, če se tradicionalno uporablja za označevanje specifičnega proizvoda ali opredeljuje tradicionalne ali posebne lastnosti proizvoda.
In this case, the name ‘Suikerstroop’ has been used for centuries to define this specific product.
V tem primeru se ime „Suikerstroop“ že stoletja uporablja za opredelitev tega specifičnega proizvoda.
It identifies the specific character of the product, being a syrup made with the liquid left behind during the production of sugar from sugar beet or sugar cane.
Opredeljuje posebne lastnosti proizvoda, to je sirupa iz tekočine, ki ostane pri proizvodnji sladkorja iz sladkorne pese ali sladkornega trsa.
Therefore, the name complies with the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
Zato ime izpolnjuje zahteve iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 does not require a TSG product to be unique or distinctive.
Uredba (EU) št. 1151/2012 ne določa, da mora biti proizvod, registriran kot zajamčena tradicionalna posebnost, edinstven ali tipičen.
It has to be identifiable and distinguishable.
Mora biti prepoznaven in razpoznaven.
According to Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 only names that refer to claims of a general nature used for a set of products or to claims provided for by particular Union legislation are excluded.
V skladu s členom 18(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 so izključena samo imena, ki se nanašajo na splošne trditve, uporabljene za skupino proizvodov, ali na trditve, ki jih določa posebna zakonodaja Unije.
‘Suikerstroop’ is clearly identified as regards its characteristics and production method.
„Suikerstroop“ ima jasno opredeljene značilnosti in proizvodno metodo.
In addition, the product covered by the product specification of the name ‘Suikerstroop’ complies with the requirements set out in Article 18(1) points (a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 since the mode of production corresponds to traditional practice for this product and the ingredients are those traditionally used.
Poleg tega proizvod iz specifikacije proizvoda z imenom „Suikerstroop“ izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 18(1)(a) in (b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, saj način proizvodnje ustreza tradicionalni praksi za ta proizvod in so sestavine tiste, ki se tradicionalno uporabljajo.
The sentence in point 3.1 of the product specification ‘Once the procedure under Article 18(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been completed, it is intended that the words “traditional Dutch product” will appear on the label in the language of the country in which the product is marketed’ does not comply with Article 18(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
Stavek iz točke 3.1 specifikacije proizvoda: „Po zaključenem postopku iz člena 18(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je predvideno, da se na etiketi navedejo besede,tradicionalen nizozemski proizvod' v jeziku države, v kateri se proizvod trži“ ni v skladu s členom 18(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
It should be replaced by the following sentence: ‘The name shall be accompanied by the claim “made following the tradition of the Netherlands”’.
Nadomestiti bi ga bilo treba z naslednjim stavkom: „Ime spremlja trditev,izdelano po tradiciji Nizozemske'“.
The Dutch authorities have agreed that this amendment is included in the product specification which has to be re-published for information.
Nizozemski organi so se strinjali, da se ta sprememba vključi v specifikacijo proizvoda, ki jo je treba v informativne namene ponovno objaviti.
Although products similar to ‘Suikerstroop’ are marketed in other Member States under a name which is deemed the translation, in the official languages of those Member States, of the term ‘Suikerstroop’, it cannot be concluded that an ‘identical name’ is used in the market of those Member States for similar products.
Čeprav se v drugih državah članicah tržijo podobni proizvodi, kot je „Suikerstroop“, pod imenom v uradnih jezikih teh držav članic, ki velja za prevod izraza „Suikerstroop“, ni mogoče zaključiti, da se na trgih navedenih držav članic za podoben proizvod uporablja „identično ime“.
The name used in those Member States has indeed the same meaning as Suikerstroop in Dutch language but it is not identical to ‘Suikerstroop’ since it is expressed in a different language.
Ime, ki se uporablja v teh državah članicah, ima dejansko enak pomen kot Suikerstroop v nizozemščini, ni pa enako navedbi „Suikerstroop“, saj je izraženo v drugem jeziku.
In addition, the name ‘Suikerstroop’ is not protected as such but only in conjunction with the claim ‘made following the tradition of the Netherlands’.
Poleg tega ni zaščiteno ime „Suikerstroop“ kot tako, pač pa samo v povezavi s trditvijo „izdelano po tradiciji Nizozemske“.
Therefore, those names of products similar to the product referred to in the application of ‘Suikerstroop’, marketed in the Danish, Swedish, Finnish, German and Baltic markets, whose meaning is ‘syrup of sugar’ and represent the translation of the name ‘Suikerstroop’ in their respective languages, may continue to be used.
Zato se lahko še naprej uporabljajo imena za proizvode, ki so podobni proizvodu iz zahtevka za „Suikerstroop“, ki se tržijo na danskem, švedskem, finskem, nemškem in baltskem trgu in katerih ime pomeni „sladkorni sirup“ ter je prevod imena „Suikerstroop“ v zadevnem jeziku.
They are not identical to ‘Suikerstroop’ and they should not be considered as imitations or evocations of the name ‘Suikerstroop’ because the name ‘Suikerstroop’, once registered, will have to be accompanied by the claim ‘made following the tradition of the Netherlands’.
Imena niso identična imenu „Suikerstroop“ in se jih ne bi smelo obravnavati kot posnemanje ali navajanje imena „Suikerstroop“, saj bo ime „Suikerstroop“ po registraciji morala spremljati trditev „izdelano po tradiciji Nizozemske“.
Therefore the protection of this name is limited to the name as referring to the Dutch tradition.
Zato je zaščita tega imena omejena na ime, ki se sklicuje na tradicijo Nizozemske.
In addition, it is obvious that the registration of the name ‘Suikerstroop’ may not prevent the use of the single terms ‘sugar’ or ‘syrup’ which are common names.
Poleg tega je očitno, da registracija imena „Suikerstroop“ ne preprečuje uporabe posamičnih izrazov „sladkorni“ ali „sirup“, ki sta obči imeni.
The Netherlands and Finland have also agreed to delete the last sentence of Section 3.2 which reads: ‘There are no other products of the same name or similar products with a similar-sounding name’.
Nizozemska in Finska sta se dogovorili tudi, da se črta zadnji stavek oddelka 3.2, ki se glasi: „Drugi proizvodi z enakim imenom ali podobni proizvodi s podobno zvenečim imenom ne obstajajo“.
Such a sentence should be therefore deleted from the product specification, which has to be re-published for information purposes.
Ta stavek bi bilo zato treba črtati iz specifikacije proizvoda, ki jo je treba v informativne namene ponovno objaviti.
In the light of the above, the name ‘Suikerstroop’ should be entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed.
Glede na navedeno bi bilo treba ime „Suikerstroop“ vpisati v register zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti.
The consolidated version of the single document should be published for information.
Prečiščeno besedilo enotnega dokumenta bi bilo treba objaviti v informativne namene.
The name ‘Suikerstroop’ (TSG) is registered.
Ime „Suikerstroop“ (ZTP) se registrira.
The name in the first paragraph identifies a product from Class 2.3. bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker's wares set out in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 [4].Article 2
Ime iz prvega odstavka opredeljuje proizvod skupine 2.3 Kruh, fino pecivo, slaščice, keksi in drugi pekovski izdelki iz Priloge XI k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 [4].Člen 2
The name referred in Article 1 shall be accompanied by the claim ‘made following the tradition of the Netherlands’.
Ime iz člena 1 spremlja trditev „izdelano po tradiciji Nizozemske“.
The consolidated product specification is set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Prečiščena različica specifikacije proizvoda je v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
OJ C 187, 19.6.2014, p. 9.
UL C 187, 19.6.2014, str. 9.
Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed (OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 509/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnostih kmetijskih proizvodov in živil (UL L 93, 31.3.2006, str.
Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed [1]
Uredba (ES) št. 509/2006 o zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnostih kmetijskih proizvodov in živil [1]
‘SUIKERSTROOP’
„SUIKERSTROOP“
EC No: NL-TSG-0007-01203 – 27.1.2014
Št.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT GROUP
ES: NL-TSG-0007-01203 – 27.1.2014
Name: Kenniscentrum suiker & voeding
NAZIV IN NASLOV SKUPINE VLOŽNIKOV
Address: Amsterdamsestraatweg 39a, 3744 MA BAARN
Naziv Kenniscentrum suiker & voeding
Tel. +31 355433455
Naslov Amsterdamsestraatweg 39a, 3744 MA BAARN
Fax +31 355426626
Telefon +31 355433455
Email: info@kenniscentrumsuiker.nl
Telefaks +31 355426626
MEMBER STATE OR THIRD COUNTRY
E–naslov info@kenniscentrumsuiker.nl
The Netherlands
DRŽAVA ČLANICA ALI TRETJA DRŽAVA
PRODUCT SPECIFICATION
Nizozemska
Name(s) to be registered (Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1216/2007 [2])
SPECIFIKACIJA PROIZVODA
‘Suikerstroop’
Ime za registracijo (člen 2 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1216/2007 [2])
The name shall be accompanied by the claim ‘made following the tradition of the Netherlands’.
„Suikerstroop“
Whether the name
Ime spremlja trditev „izdelano po tradiciji Nizozemske“.
☒ is specific in itself
Gre za ime, ki
☐ expresses the specific character of the agricultural product or foodstuff
☒ je specifično samo po sebi
The product has had this name for centuries.
☐ izraža posebne lastnosti kmetijskega proizvoda ali živila
‘Suikerstroop’ [treacle] is obtained during the production of sugar.
Ime proizvoda se uporablja že več stoletij.
Article 12 of the 1977 Sugar and Syrup (Commodities Act) Decree provides that: ‘The name “suikerstroop”, preceded where appropriate by the name of the plant from which the product is made, must and may only be used to describe the syrupy liquid obtained from the massecuite of the plant from which the product is made after extraction of the sugar crystals…’.
„Suikerstroop“ [melasa] se pridobiva pri proizvodnji sladkorja.
Whether reservation of the name is sought under Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006
Člen 12 odloka o sladkorju in sirupu iz leta 1977 (zakon o živilih) določa: „Ime 'Suikerstroop', pred katerim je, kadar je ustrezno, ime rastline, iz katere je proizvod narejen, se mora in sme uporabljati le za opis sirupaste tekočine, ki se pridobiva iz kuhane rastline, iz katere po ekstrakciji sladkornih kristalov nastane proizvod …“.
☒ Registration with reservation of the name
Ali se zahteva pridržanje imena v skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 509/2006?
☐ Registration without reservation of the name
☒ Registracija s pridržanjem imena
Type of product
☐ Registracija brez pridržanja imena
Class 2.3: Confectionery, bread, pastry, cakes, biscuits and other bakers' wares
Vrsta proizvoda
‘Suikerstroop’ is the syrupy liquid obtained from the massecuite of the sugar beet or sugar cane from which the product is made after the extraction of the sugar crystals.
Opis kmetijskega proizvoda ali živila, za katerega se uporablja ime pod točko 3.1 (člen 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1216/2007)
This liquid has an extract content of at least 80 %, an ash content of no more than 4,0 % and an apparent purity of at least 73 %.
Zaradi visoke vsebnosti suhe snovi proizvoda in visoke vsebnosti sladkorja (več kot 60 g na 100 g) ima proizvod zelo dolg rok trajanja.
The high dry matter content of the product in combination with its high sugar concentration (more than 60 g per 100 g) means that it has a long shelf life.
Sladkor zagotavlja majhno razpoložljivost „proste vode“, kar pomeni, da se ne morejo razviti mikroorganizmi.
The sugar ensures that there is a low availability of ‘free water’, which means that no micro-organisms can develop.
Proizvod ima naslednje posebne značilnosti:
Colour
Skupni sladkorji
Brix [3]
2000–30000 IE [4]
Total sugars
min.
min.
Fizične značilnosti
79°
„Suikerstroop“ je lepljiva, gosta, viskozna, temno rjava sirupasta tekočina.
min.
Vsebuje veliko količino sladkorja (vsaj 70 %).
70 %
Kemijske lastnosti
Physical characteristics
„Suikerstroop“ ima vsaj 73-odstotno navidezno čistost.
‘Suikerstroop’ is a sticky, thick, viscous, dark brown, syrupy liquid.
Vsebnost ekstrakta mora biti vsaj 80-odstotna, vsebnost pepela v proizvodu „Suikerstroop“ pa ne sme biti več kot 4-odstotna.
It contains a large quantity of sugar (at least 70 %).
Organoleptične značilnosti
Chemical properties
„Suikerstroop“ ima sladko-slan in rahlo grenak okus.
‘Suikerstroop’ has an apparent purity of at least 73 %.
Sladkost nastane zaradi visoke vsebnosti sladkorja, slanost pa zaradi mineralov in drugih (topnih) sestavin sladkorne pese ali sladkornega trsa, ki ostanejo v sirupu kot rezultat proizvodnega postopka.
The extract content should be at least 80 %, and the ash content of ‘suikerstroop’ may not be higher than 4 %.
Opis proizvodne metode, na katero se nanaša ime iz točke 3.1
Organoleptic characteristics
Surovina za „Suikerstroop“ je sirupasta tekočina, ki nastane pri proizvodnji sladkorja iz sladkorne pese ali sladkornega trsa po ekstrakciji sladkornih kristalov.
‘Suikerstroop’ has a sweet/salty and slightly bitter taste.
Postopek ekstrakcije pri proizvodnji kristalnega sladkorja vključuje raztapljanje sladkorjev iz sladkorne pese ali sladkornega trsa v vodi.
The sweetness is produced by the high sugar content and the saltiness by the minerals and other (soluble) components from the sugar beet or sugar cane which are found in the syrup as a result of the production process.
Ostale – v vodi topne – sestavine („nesladkorji“) iz sladkorne pese ali sladkornega trsa se prav tako raztopijo.
Description of the production method to which the name under point 3.1 applies
Ekstrakt se očisti, zgosti in kristalizira.
The raw material for ‘suikerstroop’ is the syrupy liquid left behind during the production of sugar from sugar beet or sugar cane after extraction of the sugar crystals.
Po kristalizaciji tako pridobljene sladkorne raztopine se ekstrahirajo sladkorni kristali.
In the production of granulated sugar, the extraction process involves dissolving the sugars from the sugar beet or sugar cane in water.
„Nesladkorji“ ostanejo v preostali sladkorni raztopini, ki ji pravimo tudi matična lužina (ali sirup oz. odcejeni sirup).