natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By the expiry review anti-dumping Regulation, the Commission extended the definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the PRC following an expiry review and terminating the partial interim review investigation pursuant to respectively, Article 11(2) and Article 11(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation.
Komisija je s protidampinško uredbo v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in zaključku preiskave v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne protidampinške uredbe razširila dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani.
By the expiry review anti-subsidy Regulation, the Commission extended a definitive countervailing duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the PRC following an expiry review and terminating the partial interim review investigation pursuant to respectively, Article 18(2) and Article 19(3) of the basic anti- subsidy Regulation (the expiry review anti-dumping Regulation and the expiry review anti-subsidy Regulation are hereinafter collectively referred as ‘the expiry review Regulations’).
Komisija je s protisubvencijsko uredbo v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18(2) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe in po zaključku preiskave v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom v skladu s členom 19(3) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe razširila dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani (protidampinška uredba v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa in protisubvencijska uredba v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa sta v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj imenovani: uredbi v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa).
By the repeal Regulation the Commission repealed the undertaking.
Z uredbo o razveljavitvi je Komisija razveljavila zavezo.
By the expiry Notices the Commission gave notice that the anti-dumping duty and the anti-subsidy duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the PRC expired on 3 September 2018.
Komisija je v obvestilih o izteku ukrepa sporočila, da sta se protidampinška in protisubvencijska dajatev na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz LRK ali ki so od tam poslani, iztekli 3. septembra 2018.
Under the terms of the undertaking, the exporting producers agreed, inter alia, not to sell the product concerned to the first independent customer in the Union below a certain minimum import price (‘the MIP’).
V skladu s pogoji zaveze so proizvajalci izvozniki med drugim soglašali, da zadevnega izdelka ne bodo prodajali prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji pod določeno minimalno uvozno ceno (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MIP).
The MIP was subject to a quarterly adjustment mechanism by reference to international spot prices of modules including Chinese prices as reported by the Bloomberg database.
MIP se je vsako četrtletje prilagajala glede na mednarodne promptne cene modulov, vključno s kitajskimi cenami, kot jih navaja Bloombergova podatkovna zbirka.
The exporting producers also agreed to sell the product concerned only by means of direct sales.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so se tudi zavezali, da bodo zadevni izdelek prodajali le prek neposredne prodaje.
For the purpose of the undertaking, a direct sale was defined as a sale either to the first independent customer in the Union or via a related party in the Union listed in the undertaking.
Za namene zaveze je bila neposredna prodaja opredeljena kot prodaja bodisi prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji ali kot prodaja prek povezane stranke v Uniji, navedene v zavezi.
Indirect sales to the Union by companies other than those listed in the undertaking constituted a breach of the undertaking.
Posredna prodaja v Unijo s strani družb, ki niso navedene v zavezi, je pomenila kršitev zaveze.
The undertaking also clarified, in a non-exhaustive list, what constituted a breach of the undertaking.
V zavezi je prav tako v okviru neizčrpnega seznama pojasnjeno, kaj šteje za kršitev zaveze.
That list included, in particular, issuing undertaking invoices for solar panels produced by a non-undertaking company in order to benefit from the exemption of anti-dumping and countervailing duties (‘the company channelling’).
Navedeni seznam je vključeval zlasti izdajanje računov na podlagi zaveze za solarne panele, ki jih je proizvajala družba, ki ni zajeta v zavezi, da bi imela koristi od oprostitve protidampinških in izravnalnih dajatev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: preusmerjanje v druge družbe).
The undertaking also obliged the exporting producers to provide the Commission on a quarterly basis with detailed information on all their export sales to and re-sales in the Union (‘the quarterly reports’).
Zaveza od proizvajalcev izvoznikov tudi zahteva, da bodo Komisiji za vsako četrtletje predložili podrobne informacije o svojem celotnem izvozu in nadaljnji prodaji v Unijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: četrtletna poročila).
This implied that the data submitted in these quarterly reports must be complete and correct and that the reported transactions fully complied with the terms of the undertaking.
To je pomenilo, da so morali biti podatki v teh četrtletnih poročilih popolni in pravilni ter da so bile sporočene transakcije v celoti v skladu s pogoji zaveze.
Reporting of re-sales in the Union was a particular obligation when the product concerned was sold to the first independent customer through a related importer.
Poročanje o nadaljnji prodaji v Uniji je bilo posebej obvezno pri prodaji zadevnega izdelka prvi neodvisni stranki prek povezanega uvoznika.
Only these reports enabled the Commission to monitor whether the re-sale price of the related importer to the first independent customer was in accordance with the MIP.
Komsija je namreč samo na podlagi teh poročil lahko spremljala, ali je bila cena nadaljnje prodaje prvi neodvisni stranki s strani povezanega uvoznika v skladu z MIP.
The exporting producers were liable for the breach of any of their related parties, whether or not listed in the undertaking.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so bili odgovorni za kršitve katere koli od svojih povezanih strank, ne glede na to, ali so navedene v zavezi ali ne.
The exporting producers also undertook to consult the Commission regarding any difficulties or questions, technical or otherwise, which might arise during the implementation of the undertaking.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so se prav tako zavezali, da se bodo s Komisijo posvetovali o kakršnih koli težavah ali vprašanjih tehnične ali druge narave, ki bi se lahko pojavili pri izvajanju zaveze.
C. REPEAL OF THE UNDERTAKING
C. RAZVELJAVITEV ZAVEZE
The undertaking was initially accepted from more than 120 companies/company groups.
Zavezo je sprva sprejelo več kot 120 družb/skupin družb.
In the meantime, the Commission withdrew its acceptance of the undertaking for 19 companies.
Komisija je nato preklicala sprejetje zaveze za 19 družb.
Seventeen of these were found to have breached the undertaking while the remaining two companies had business models that made it impracticable to monitor their compliance with the undertaking.
Pri 17 izmed njih je bilo ugotovljeno, da so kršile zavezo, preostali dve pa sta imeli poslovna modela, ki nista omogočala spremljanja izpolnjevanja zaveze.
In addition, 16 other Chinese companies voluntarily withdrew from the undertaking.
Poleg tega se je 16 drugih kitajskih družb prostovoljno umaknilo iz zaveze.
By the repeal Regulation, the Commission repealed the undertaking and introduced a variable duty under the form of a minimum import price (‘the variable duty MIP’) that replaced the undertaking.
Komisija je z uredbo o razveljavitvi razveljavila zavezo in uvedla spremenljivo dajatev v obliki minimalne uvozne cene (v nadaljnjem besedilu: spremenljiva dajatev v obliki MIP), ki je nadomestila zavezo.
The variable duty MIP means that eligible imports with a declared value at, or above, the MIP would not be subject to duties and customs authorities will levy duties immediately if the product is imported at a price below the MIP.
Spremenljiva dajatev v obliki MIP pomeni, da za upravičeni uvoz z deklarirano vrednostjo, ki je enaka MIP ali višja od nje, dajatve ne bi več veljale, carinski organi pa obračunajo dajatve takoj, ko se izdelek uvozi po ceni, ki je nižja od MIP.
Given that the variable duty MIP replaced the undertaking, the Commission found it appropriate, as per the findings listed in recitals (50) to (53) of the repeal Regulation, that the variable duty MIP would only apply to those companies that had not breached the undertaking in the past, irrespective of whether such a breach had already been found to have occurred, or whether such a breach would be found to have occurred in future investigations by the Commission.
Glede na to, da je spremenljiva dajatev v obliki MIP nadomestila zavezo, se je Komisiji zdelo primerno, kakor je pojasnjeno v ugotovitvah iz uvodnih izjav 50 do 53 uredbe o razveljavitvi, da se spremenljiva dajatev v obliki MIP uporablja le za navedene družbe, ki v preteklosti niso kršile zaveze, ne glede na to, ali je taka kršitev že bila ugotovljena ali pa bi bila ugotovljena v prihodnjih preiskavah Komisije.
Accordingly, for all exporting producers which breached the undertaking while it was still in place the uncapped ad valorem duties should apply.
Zato se morajo za vse proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so kršili zavezo, ko je ta še veljala, uporabljati neomejene dajatve ad valorem.
At the time of entry into force of the repeal Regulation on 1 October 2017, the Commission continued to conduct investigations concerning the compliance with the undertaking, and considered appropriate to open new investigations for goods that were released for free circulation while the undertaking was still in place.
Ob začetku veljavnosti uredbe o razveljavitvi 1. oktobra 2017 je Komisija še naprej izvajala preiskave glede izpolnjevanja zaveze in se ji je zdelo primerno, da uvede nove preiskave za blago, ki je bilo sproščeno v prosti promet, ko je zaveza še veljala.
For those investigations, a customs debt will be incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation: (a) whenever it is established, in respect of imports invoiced by companies subject to the undertaking, that one or more of the conditions of the undertaking was not fulfilled; or (b) when the Commission finds that the undertaking was breached in a regulation or decision which refers to particular transactions and declares the relevant undertaking invoices as invalid.
Za navedene preiskave bo carinski dolg nastal ob sprejetju deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet: (a) kadar koli se v zvezi z uvozom, ki ga zaračunajo družbe, za katere velja zaveza, ugotovi, da ni izpolnjen eden ali več pogojev zaveze; ali (b) ko Komisija v uredbi ali sklepu, ki zadeva določene transakcije, ugotovi, da je bila zaveza kršena, ter zadevne račune na podlagi zaveze razglasi za neveljavne.
The Commission received evidence from customs authorities of two Member States on the basis of Articles 8(9) and 14(7) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Articles 13(9) and 24(7) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation regarding compliance of Sinski PV and Koly Energy with the undertaking.
Komisija je prejela dokaze carinskih organov dveh držav članic na podlagi členov 8(9) in 14(7) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členov 13(9) in 24(7) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe glede izpolnjevanja zaveze s strani družb Sinski PV in Koly Energy.
The Commission also assessed publicly available information regarding the corporate structure of Koly Energy.
Komisija je ocenila tudi javno dostopne informacije glede korporacijske strukture družbe Koly Energy.
The findings listed in recitals (21) to (24) below address the allegations received from the customs authorities for Sinski PV and Koly Energy regarding an alleged breach of the undertaking while it was still in force.
Ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 21 do 24 obravnavajo trditve carinskih organov glede družb Sinski PV in Koly Energy v zvezi z domnevno kršitvijo zaveze, ko je ta še veljala.
E. GROUNDS TO INVALIDATE UNDERTAKING INVOICES
E. RAZLOGI ZA RAZVELJAVITEV RAČUNOV NA PODLAGI ZAVEZE
The evidence received from customs authorities suggests that Sinski PV sold solar panels to at least one customer in the Union systematically below the MIP, thus breaching the provisions of the undertaking as described in recital (9) above.
Dodatni dokazi tudi kažejo, da je družba Sinski PV sodelovala s tremi drugimi družbami pri izdaji računov na podlagi zaveze za solarne proizvode, ki jih proizvajajo družbe, ki niso zajete v zavezi, in sicer z naročili, ki jih je pošiljala stranka družbe Sinski PV v Uniji.
Further evidence also shows that Sinski PV engaged with three other companies to issue undertaking invoices for solar products manufactured by non-undertaking companies as per purchase orders placed by a customer of Sinski PV in the Union.
Ta praksa (preusmerjanje v druge družbe) pomeni kršitev, ki je izrecno navedena v zavezi, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 11.
This practice (company channelling) constitutes a breach specifically listed in the undertaking as described in recital (11) above.
Na podlagi dokazov, ki so jih predložili carinski organi in ki jih potrjujejo javno dostopni viri, je družba Koly Energy prodajala solarne panele domnevno nepovezanemu uvozniku v Uniji, za katerega je izdajala račune na podlagi zaveze.
Based on the evidence received from customs authorities and corroborated by publicly available sources, Koly Energy sold solar panels to an allegedly unrelated importer in the Union for which it issued undertaking invoices.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so na voljo Komisiji, je bil uvoznik, vključen v te transakcije, z družbo Koly Energy povezan v smislu člena 127(1) Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2447 („izvedbeni akt carinskega zakonika Unije“).
The transactions to this importer amounted in value to more than 50 % of Koly Energy's total sales to the Union.
Družba Koly Energy ni nikoli poročala o povezanem uvozniku v Uniji.
Based on the information available to the Commission, the importer involved in these transactions was related to Koly Energy in the sense of Article 127(1) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 (‘Union Customs Code Implementing Act’).
Ker ta uvoznik v zavezi ni naveden kot povezana stranka, je družba Koly Energy kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodni izjavi 10.
Koly Energy has never reported a related importer in the Union.
Obveznosti poročanja povezanih uvoznikov so podobne obveznostim njihovih kitajskih matičnih družb, da bi lahko Komisija ocenila, ali je neto prodajna cena, ki se zaračunava prvi nepovezani stranki v Uniji, enaka MIP ali višja od nje.
As this importer is not listed as a related party in the undertaking, Koly Energy breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recital (10) above.
Komisija ni bila obveščena o nobeni nadaljnji prodaji s strani povezanega uvoznika.
Related importers have reporting obligations similar to their Chinese mother companies in order to enable the Commission to assess whether the net sales price to the first unrelated customer in the Union is at, or above, the MIP.
Zato je tudi družba Koly Energy kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 12 in 13.
None of the re-sales by the related importer was reported to the Commission.
F. ZADEVNI RAČUNI NA PODLAGI ZAVEZE
Consequently, Koly Energy also breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals (12) and (13) above.
Prodajne transakcije, ki jih je izvrševala družba Sinski PV, ko je izdelek prodajala določenemu kupcu po ceni, nižji od MIP, in/ali ki so vključevale preusmerjanje v druge družbe, so bile povezane z naslednjimi računi na podlagi zaveze:
F. RELEVANT UNDERTAKING INVOICES
Številka trgovinskega računa, priloženega blagu, ki je predmet zaveze
The sales transactions made by Sinski PV below the MIP to the identified customer and/or involving company channelling were linked to the following undertaking invoices:
Datum
Number of Commercial invoice accompanying goods subject to an undertaking
Posredne prodajne transakcije, ki jih je izvršila družba Koly Energy, so bile povezane z naslednjimi računi na podlagi zaveze:
Date
G. PISNA STALIŠČA IN ZASLIŠANJA
The indirect sales transactions made by Koly Energy were linked to the following undertaking invoices:
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o ugotovitvah, zlasti o nameri, da se razveljavijo računi na podlagi zaveze.
Interested parties were informed of the findings, in particular the intention to invalidate the undertaking invoices.
En uvoznik in en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik sta predložila pisna stališča.
Interested parties were granted the opportunity to be heard and to comment pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Komisija je proučila pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, in jih obravnavala v nadaljevanju.
One importer and one Chinese exporting producer made written submissions.
Družba Koly Energy in njen domnevno povezani uvoznik v Uniji sta nasprotovala ugotovitvi, da sta povezana, in zanikala, da sta del skupne holdinške skupine.
The Commission considered the comments submitted by the interested parties and addressed them below.
Družba Koly Energy je trdila, da je v 100-odstotni lasti dveh kitajskih oseb, ki nimata deleža niti pri uvozniku v Uniji niti v kateri koli holdinški skupini.
Koly Energy and its allegedly related importer in the Union contested the affiliation relationship between them and denied being part of a common holding group.
Trdila je tudi, da je ohranila tesen poslovni odnos s holdinško skupino, ker je ta njena največja stranka.
Koly Energy submitted that it is 100 % owned by two Chinese persons that have no stake in either the importer in the Union or in any holding group.
Vendar je zanikala, da med njo in uvoznikom obstaja kakršna koli povezava in da ni pod nadzorom iste holdinške skupine.
It further submitted that it maintained a close business relationship with the holding group because it was Koly Energy's biggest customer.
Komisija je menila, da glede na to, da ni dokazov o nasprotnem, zastopanost družbe Koly Energy kot prodajalca v pogodbi o prodaji in dobavi solarnih modulov s strani upravljavca poslovnih dejavnosti holdinške skupine, ki ji pripada tudi uvoznik, predstavlja potrditev povezave med družbo Koly Energy, uvoznikom in navedeno holdinško skupino v razmerju do tretjih oseb v smislu člena 127(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 („izvedbeni akt carinskega zakonika Unije“).
It denied, however, the existence of any ties between the importer and itself and denied being controlled by the same holding party.
To ugotovitev je dodatno okrepilo dejstvo, da sta bila na isti pogodbi navedena tako podpis družbe Koly Energy kot podpis uvoznika v imenu prodajalca (družba Koly Energy).
The Commission considered that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the representation of Koly Energy as seller in a purchase and delivery contract of solar modules by a commercial operations manager of the holding group to which the importer also belongs constituted an acknowledgement, towards third parties, of an affiliation relationship between Koly Energy, the importer and that holding group in the sense of Article 127(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 (‘Union Customs Code Implementing Act’).
To mnenje je bilo potrjeno tudi z navedbo elektronskega naslova holdinške skupine kot kontaktnih podatkov družbe Koly Energy (prodajalec) za komunikacijske namene v zvezi z navedeno pogodbo.
This conclusion was further strengthened as the same contract showed both Koly Energy and the importer's signatures on behalf of the seller (Koly Energy).
Poleg tega je navedena pogodba vključevala klavzulo, v kateri sta bila ime in poštni naslov uvoznika navedena kot kontaktna oseba prodajalca (Koly Energy).
The identification of an email address of the holding group as contact data of Koly Energy (the seller) for communication purposes as regards that contract further confirmed this view.
Čeprav je družba Koly Energy trdila, da je bila ta pogodba podpisana brez njenega dovoljenja, zaradi česar si pridružuje pravico, da uvoznik prevzame odgovornost, pa Komisiji v zvezi s tem nikoli ni bil predložen noben dokaz.
Moreover, that contract included a clause in which the name and mailing address of the importer was mentioned as the contact person of the seller (Koly Energy).
Na podlagi drugih povezav med družbo Koly Energy, uvoznikom in holdinško skupino v drugih javnih dokumentih in virih, kot so spletne strani in pogodba o izdaji kratkoročnih obveznic, je Komisija sklenila, da sta družba Koly Energy in uvoznik v Uniji povezani stranki.
Although Koly Energy claimed that this contract was signed without its authorisation and therefore reserved its right to hold the importer responsible, no evidence to that effect was ever presented to the Commission.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Other cross references between Koly Energy, the importer and the holding group in other public documents and sources such as websites and a short term bonds' issuance contract led the Commission to the conclusion that Koly Energy and the importer in the Union were related parties.
Družba Koly Energy je trdila tudi, da je uvoznik v Uniji enostransko in brez privolitve uporabljal njen logotip, blagovno znamko in domensko ime.
The submission was, therefore, rejected.
Komisija je menila, da ob odsotnosti nasprotnih dokazov javna in razširjena uporaba poslovnih znakov družbe Koly Energy (blagovne znamke, logotipa, elektronskega naslova) s strani uvoznika pri njegovih običajnih poslovnih dejavnostih potrjuje povezavo družb prek skupne holdinške skupine.
Koly Energy also claimed that the importer in the Union used Koly Energy's logo, trademark and domain name unilaterally and without consent.
Uvoznik družbe Koly Energy v Uniji je po izteku podaljšanja, odobrenega za predložitev pripomb, posredoval neutemeljene pripombe, vendar ni predložil nobenih dokazov v zvezi z njegovim lastništvom.
The Commission considered that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the public and widespread use of Koly Energy's commercial signs (trademark, logo, email address) by the importer in its usual business activities attested to an affiliation relationship between the two companies through the banner of a common holding group.
H. KRŠITEV SPREJETJA ZAVEZE IN DOLOČITEV DOKONČNIH DAJATEV
The claim was, therefore, dismissed.
Zato se v skladu s členom 3(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, členom 2(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/367, členom 2(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 in členom 2(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/366, veljavnih ob sprejetju carinske deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet, računi družb Sinski PV in Koly Energy, navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 25 in 26, razglasijo za neveljavne.
The importer of Koly Energy in the Union submitted non-substantiated comments outside the extensions granted to comment and presented no evidence regarding its ownership.
Carinski dolg, ki je nastal ob sprejetju deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet, morajo nacionalni carinski organi v skladu s členom 105(3) do 105(6) Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta izterjati ob začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
H. BREACH OF THE UNDERTAKING AND IMPOSITION OF DEFINITIVE DUTIES
Nacionalni carinski organi, ki so pristojni za pobiranje dajatev, bodo o tem ustrezno obveščeni.