natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Communication of 6 April 2016 announced that the Commission was to launch a study on the feasibility of establishing a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS).
V sporočilu z dne 6. aprila 2016 je Komisija napovedala začetek študije o izvedljivosti vzpostavitve Evropskega sistema za potovalne informacije in odobritve (ETIAS).
The system would determine the eligibility of visa-exempt third-country nationals prior to their travel to the Schengen Area, and whether such travel poses a security, illegal immigration or high epidemic risk.
Treba je določiti cilje ETIAS, opredeliti njegovo tehnično in organizacijsko arhitekturo, določiti pravila v zvezi z delovanjem in uporabo podatkov, ki jih bodo v sistem vnašali prosilci, in pravila glede izdaje ali zavrnitve potovalnih odobritev, opredeliti, za katere namene se obdelujejo podatki, določiti, kateri organi so pooblaščeni za dostop do podatkov, ter zagotoviti varstvo osebnih podatkov.
The Communication of 14 September 2016 ‘Enhancing security in a world of mobility: improved information exchange in the fight against terrorism and stronger external borders’ confirms the priority of securing external borders and presents concrete initiatives to accelerate and broaden the Union’s response in continuing to strengthen the management of external borders.
ETIAS bi morali uporabljati za državljane tretjih držav, ki so oproščeni vizumske obveznosti.
It is necessary to specify the objectives of ETIAS, to define its technical and organisational architecture, to lay down rules concerning the operation and the use of the data to be entered into the system by the applicant and rules on the issue or refusal of the travel authorisations, to lay down the purposes for which the data are to be processed, to identify the authorities authorised to access the data and to ensure the protection of personal data.
ETIAS bi morali uporabljati tudi za državljane tretjih držav, ki so oproščeni vizumske obveznosti in so družinski člani državljana Unije, za katere se uporablja Direktiva 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ali državljana tretje države, ki na podlagi sporazuma med Unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter tretjo državo na drugi uživa pravico do prostega gibanja, enakovredno pravici državljanov Unije, in nimajo dovoljenja za prebivanje na podlagi Direktive 2004/38/ES ali dovoljenja za prebivanje na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1030/2002.
ETIAS should apply to third-country nationals who are exempt from the visa requirement.
V členu 21(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je določeno, da ima vsak državljan Unije pravico do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic ob upoštevanju omejitev in pogojev, določenih v Pogodbah in ukrepih, ki so bili sprejeti za njuno uveljavitev.
It should also apply to third-country nationals who are exempt from the visa requirement who are family members of a Union citizen to whom Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council applies or of a national of a third country enjoying the right of free movement equivalent to that of Union citizens under an agreement between the Union and its Member States on the one hand and a third country on the other and who do not hold a residence card pursuant to Directive 2004/38/EC or a residence permit pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1030/2002.
Te omejitve in pogoji so navedeni v Direktivi 2004/38/ES.
Article 21(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) stipulates that every citizen of the Union shall have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and by the measures adopted to give them effect.
Kot je potrdilo Sodišče, imajo ti družinski člani pravico do vstopa na ozemlje držav članic in do pridobitve vstopnega vizuma v ta namen.
The respective limitations and conditions are to be found in Directive 2004/38/EC.
Zato bi družinski člani, ki so oproščeni vizumske obveznosti, morali imeti pravico do pridobitve potovalne odobritve.
As confirmed by the Court of Justice, such family members have the right to enter the territory of the Member States and to obtain an entry visa for that purpose.
Države članice bi morale tem osebam čim bolj olajšati pridobitev potrebne potovalne odobritve, ki bi morala biti izdana brezplačno.
Consequently, family members exempted from the visa obligation should have the right to obtain a travel authorisation.
Pravica do pridobitve potovalne odobritve ni brezpogojna, saj se lahko zavrne tistim družinskim članom, ki predstavljajo tveganje za javni red, javno varnost ali javno zdravje na podlagi Direktive 2004/38/ES.
Member States should grant such persons every facility to obtain the necessary travel authorisation, which should be issued free of charge.
V skladu s tem se od družinskih članov lahko zahteva, da predložijo svoje osebne podatke zaradi ugotavljanja njihove istovetnosti in statusa, vendar le v primeru, če so ti podatki relevantni za oceno varnostne grožnje, ki bi jo lahko predstavljali.
The right to obtain a travel authorisation is not unconditional as it can be denied to those family members who represent a risk to public policy, public security or public health pursuant to Directive 2004/38/EC.
Podobno naj bi njihove prošnje za potovalno odobritev preučevali le, če obstajajo pomisleki glede varnosti, ne pa tudi pomisleki, povezani z migracijskimi tveganji.
Against this background, family members can be required to provide their personal data related to their identification and their status only insofar as these are relevant for assessment of the security threat they could represent.
ETIAS bi moral zagotavljati potovalne odobritve državljanom tretjih držav, ki so oproščeni vizumske obveznosti, in omogočati preučitev, ali njihova prisotnost na ozemlju držav članic ne predstavlja oziroma ne bo predstavljala tveganja za varnost ali nezakonito priseljevanje ali visokega tveganja za epidemijo.
Similarly, examination of their travel authorisation applications should be made exclusively against security concerns, and not those related to migration risks.
Zato bi potovalna odobritev morala pomeniti odločitev, iz katere je razvidno, da ne obstajajo konkretni znaki ali utemeljeni razlogi za sklepanje, da prisotnost osebe na ozemlju držav članic predstavlja takšna tveganja.
ETIAS should provide a travel authorisation for third-country nationals exempt from the visa requirement enabling consideration of whether their presence on the territory of the Member States does not pose or will not pose a security, illegal immigration or a high epidemic risk.
Ker je taka potovalna odobritev po svoji naravi drugačna od vizuma, zanjo ne bodo potrebne dodatne informacije, in prosilcem ne bo nalagala večjega bremena kot vizum.
A travel authorisation should therefore constitute a decision indicating that there are no factual indications or reasonable grounds to consider that the presence of a person on the territory of the Member States poses such risks.
Veljavna potovalna odobritev bi morala biti nov pogoj za vstop na ozemlje držav članic.
As such, a travel authorisation is by its nature distinct from a visa; it will not require more information or place a heavier burden on applicants than a visa does.
Sámo posedovanje potovalne odobritve pa še ne bi smelo pomeniti avtomatično dodeljene pravice do vstopa.
Holding a valid travel authorisation should be a new entry condition for the territory of the Member States.
ETIAS bi moral prispevati k visoki stopnji varnosti, preprečevanju nezakonitega priseljevanja in varovanju javnega zdravja, in sicer z ocenjevanjem potnikov, preden prispejo na mejne prehode na zunanjih mejah.
Mere possession of a travel authorisation should not, however, confer an automatic right of entry.
ETIAS bi moral prispevati k poenostavitvi mejnih kontrol, ki jih na mejnih prehodih na zunanjih mejah izvajajo mejni policisti.
ETIAS should contribute to a high level of security, to the prevention of illegal immigration and to the protection of public health by providing an assessment of visitors prior to their arrival at the external border crossing points.
Zagotoviti bi moral tudi usklajeno in harmonizirano oceno državljanov tretjih držav, za katere velja zahteva po potovalni odobritvi in ki nameravajo potovati v države članice.
ETIAS should contribute to the facilitation of border checks performed by border guards at the external border crossing points.
Nadalje bi moral omogočati boljšo obveščenost prosilcev o tem, ali izpolnjujejo pogoje za potovanje v države članice.
It should also ensure a coordinated and harmonised assessment of third-country nationals subject to the travel authorisation requirement who intend to travel to Member States.
Poleg tega bi moral ETIAS prispevati k poenostavitvi mejnih kontrol, in sicer z zmanjšanjem števila zavrnitev vstopa na zunanjih mejah in zagotavljanjem določenih dodatnih informacij v zvezi z oznakami mejnim policistom.
Furthermore, it should enable applicants to be better informed of their eligibility to travel to Member States.
ETIAS bi moral poleg tega podpirati cilje schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS) v povezavi z razpisi ukrepov za državljane tretjih držav, ki jim je bil zavrnjen vstop in prepovedano bivanje, za osebe, za katere se zahteva prijetje zaradi predaje ali izročitve, pogrešane osebe, osebe, iskane zaradi sodelovanja v sodnem postopku, in osebe, v zvezi s katerimi se izvajajo prikrite ali namenske kontrole.
In addition, ETIAS should contribute to the facilitation of border checks by reducing the number of refusals of entry at the external borders and by providing border guards with certain additional information related to flags.
V ta namen bi ETIAS moral relevantne podatke iz dosjejev prosilcev primerjati z zadevnimi razpisi ukrepov v SIS.
ETIAS should also support the objectives of the Schengen Information System (SIS) related to alerts on third-country nationals subject to a refusal of entry and stay, on persons wanted for arrest for surrender purposes or extradition purposes, on missing persons, on persons sought to assist with a judicial procedure and on persons for discreet checks or specific checks.
Kadar se pri primerjavi izkaže, da se osebni podatki iz dosjeja prosilca ujemajo z razpisi ukrepov za državljane tretjih držav, ki jim je bil zavrnjen vstop in prepovedano bivanje, za osebe, za katere se zahteva prijetje zaradi predaje ali izročitve, bi morala dosje prosilca po tej obdelavi ročno obdelati nacionalna enota ETIAS pristojne države članice.
For this purpose, ETIAS should compare relevant data from application files against relevant alerts in SIS.
Ocena, ki jo izvede nacionalna enota ETIAS, bi morala biti podlaga za odločitev o tem, ali se potovalna odobritev izda ali ne.
Where the comparison reveals a correspondence between personal data in the application file and alerts on third-country nationals subject to a refusal of entry and stay or on persons wanted for arrest for surrender purposes or extradition purposes, the application file should be processed manually by the ETIAS National Unit of the Member State responsible.
Kadar se pri primerjavi izkaže, da se osebni podatki iz dosjeja prosilca ujemajo z razpisi ukrepov za pogrešane osebe, osebe, iskane zaradi sodelovanja v sodnem postopku, in osebe, v zvezi s katerimi se izvajajo prikrite ali namenske kontrole, bi bilo treba te informacije posredovati uradu SIRENE in obravnavati v skladu z zadevno zakonodajo o SIS.
The assessment performed by the ETIAS National Unit should lead to a decision whether to issue a travel authorisation or not.
Pogoji za izdajo potovalne odobritve bi morali biti skladni s specifičnimi cilji, povezanimi z različnimi vrstami razpisov ukrepov, zabeleženih v SIS.
Where the comparison reveals a correspondence between personal data in the application file and alerts on missing persons, on persons sought to assist with a judicial procedure and on persons for discreet checks or specific checks, this information should be transferred to the SIRENE bureau and should be dealt with in accordance with the relevant legislation relating to SIS.
Zlasti dejstvo, da za prosilca velja razpis ukrepa za osebe, za katere se zahteva prijetje zaradi predaje ali izročitve, ali razpis ukrepa za osebe, v zvezi s katerimi se izvajajo prikrite ali namenske kontrole, ne bi smelo preprečiti, da se prosilcu izda potovalna odobritev, in sicer da bi lahko države članice sprejele ustrezen ukrep v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2007/533/PNZ.
The conditions for issuing a travel authorisation should be coherent with the specific objectives associated with the different types of alerts recorded in SIS.
ETIAS bi morali sestavljati obsežen informacijski sistem, informacijski sistem ETIAS, centralna enota ETIAS in nacionalne enote ETIAS.
In particular, the fact that applicants would be subject to an alert on persons wanted for arrest for surrender purposes or extradition purposes or to an alert on persons for discreet checks or specific checks should not prevent them from being issued with a travel authorisation with a view to Member States taking appropriate action in accordance with Council Decision 2007/533/JHA.
Centralna enota ETIAS bi morala biti del Evropske agencije za mejno in obalno stražo.
ETIAS should consist of a large-scale information system, the ETIAS Information System, the ETIAS Central Unit and the ETIAS National Units.
Odgovorna bi morala biti za preverjanje – kadar se pri avtomatski obdelavi prošnje pokaže zadetek –, ali prosilčevi osebni podatki ustrezajo osebnim podatkom osebe, ki je sprožila zadevni zadetek.
The ETIAS Central Unit should be part of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.
Kadar je zadetek potrjen ali dvomi ostajajo, centralna enota ETIAS aktivira ročno obdelavo prošnje.
The ETIAS Central Unit should be responsible for verifying, in cases where the automated application process has reported a hit, whether the applicant’s personal data correspond to the personal data of the person having triggered that hit.
Zagotoviti bi morala posodobljenost podatkov, ki jih vnese v dosjeje prosilcev, ter opredelitev, določitev, predhodno oceno, izvajanje, naknadno vrednotenje, revidiranje in črtanje specifičnih kazalnikov tveganja in pri tem zagotavljati, da se opravljena preverjanja in njihovi rezultati zabeležijo v dosjejih prosilcev.
Where a hit is confirmed or where doubts remain, the ETIAS Central Unit should initiate the manual processing of the application.
Morala bi tudi izvajati redna preverjanja obdelave prošenj in izvajanja pravil ETIAS za varnostno preverjanje, vključno z rednim ocenjevanjem njihovega vpliva na temeljne pravice, zlasti v zvezi z zasebnostjo in varstvom osebnih podatkov.
It should ensure that the data it enters in the applications files are up to date and define, establish, assess ex ante, implement, evaluate ex post, revise and delete the specific risk indicators, ensuring that the verifications that are performed and their results are recorded in the application files.
Poleg tega bi morala biti odgovorna za izpolnjevanje različnih podpornih nalog, kot so zagotavljanje pošiljanja potrebnih uradnih obvestil ter zagotavljanje informacij in podpore.
It should also carry out regular audits of the processing of applications and of the implementation of the ETIAS screening rules, including by regularly assessing their impact on fundamental rights, in particular with regard to privacy and personal data protection.
Delovati bi morala 24 ur na dan, 7 dni v tednu.
It should furthermore be responsible for fulfilling a number of support tasks such as ensuring the necessary notifications are sent and providing information and support.
Vsaka država članica bi morala vzpostaviti nacionalno enoto ETIAS, ki bi bila odgovorna za obravnavo prošenj in odločanje glede izdaje, zavrnitve, razveljavitve ali preklica potovalnih odobritev.
It should be operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Nacionalne enote ETIAS bi morale za namen ocenjevanja prošenj sodelovati med seboj in z Agencijo Evropske unije za sodelovanje na področju preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj (Europol).
Each Member State should establish an ETIAS National Unit responsible for examining applications and deciding whether to issue or refuse, annul or revoke travel authorisations.
Nacionalnim enotam ETIAS bi bilo treba zagotoviti zadostna sredstva za izpolnjevanje nalog v skladu z roki iz te uredbe.
The ETIAS National Units should cooperate with each other and with the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) for the purpose of assessing applications.
Da bi olajšali postopek odločanja in izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami ter znižali stroške prevajanja in skrajšali odzivni čas, je zaželeno, da se vse nacionalne enote ETIAS sporazumevajo v enem jeziku.
The ETIAS National Units should be provided with adequate resources to fulfil their tasks in accordance with the deadlines set out in this Regulation.
ETIAS bi moral za izpolnjevanje svojih ciljev vključevati spletni obrazec prošnje, na katerem bi se moral prosilec izreči glede svoje istovetnosti, potne listine, prebivališča, kontaktnih podatkov, stopnje izobrazbe in poklicne skupine, o tem, ali je družinski član državljanov Unije ali državljanov tretjih držav, ki uživajo pravico do prostega gibanja, in nima dovoljenja za prebivanje na podlagi Direktive 2004/38/ES ali dovoljenja za prebivanje na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1030/2002, če je prosilec mladoletna oseba, podatkov o odgovorni osebi, ter odgovorov na niz vprašanj o ozadju.
In order to facilitate the decision-making process and the exchange of information between Member States and to reduce translation costs and response times, it is preferable that all ETIAS National Units communicate in a single language.
ETIAS bi moral sprejemati tudi prošnje, ki se vložijo v imenu prosilca, kadar potnik iz kakršnega koli razloga prošnje ne more vložiti sam.
To meet its objectives, ETIAS should provide an online application form that the applicant should fill in with declarations relating to his or her identity, travel document, residence information, contact details, level of education and job group, any status he or she holds of family member to Union citizens or third-country nationals enjoying the right of free movement and not holding a residence card pursuant to Directive 2004/38/EC or a residence permit pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1030/2002, where the applicant is minor, details of the person responsible for him or her, and answers to a set of background questions.
V takih primerih bi morala prošnjo vložiti tretja oseba, ki jo potnik pooblasti, ali ki je zanj pravno odgovorna, pri čemer mora biti na obrazcu prošnje navedena tudi njena istovetnost.
ETIAS should accept applications introduced on behalf of the applicant for travellers who are themselves not in a position to create an application, for whatever reason.
Moralo bi biti mogoče, da potniki pooblastijo komercialne posrednike, da v njihovem imenu vložijo prošnjo.
In such cases, the application should be submitted by a third party authorised by the traveller or legally responsible for him or her, provided this person’s identity is included in the application form.
Centralna enota ETIAS bi morala ustrezno ukrepati na podlagi prijav zlorab s strani komercialnih posrednikov.
It should be possible for travellers to authorise commercial intermediaries to create and submit an application on their behalf.
Zaradi preverjanja dopustnosti prošnje za potovalno odobritev bi bilo treba določiti parametre za zagotavljanje popolnosti prošnje in koherentnosti predloženih podatkov.
The ETIAS Central Unit should act upon any reports of abuses by commercial intermediaries appropriately.
S takim preverjanjem bi bilo treba na primer izključiti uporabo potnih listin, katerih veljavnost poteče čez manj kot tri mesece ali je že potekla, ali potnih listin, ki so bile izdane več kot 10 let prej.
Parameters for ensuring the completeness of an application and the coherence of the data submitted should be established to verify the admissibility of applications for a travel authorisation.
Izvesti bi ga bilo treba, še preden je prosilec pozvan k plačilu pristojbine.
For instance, such verification should preclude the use of travel documents which will expire in less than three months, have expired or were issued more than 10 years previously.
Za finalizacijo vloge bi morali prosilci plačati pristojbino za potovalno odobritev.
The verification should be undertaken before the applicant is invited to pay the fee.
Plačila bi morala biti izvedena prek banke ali finančnega posrednika.
In order to finalise the application, applicants should be required to pay a travel authorisation fee.
Podatke, ki so potrebni za izvedbo elektronskega plačila, bi bilo treba posredovati le banki ali finančnemu posredniku, ki izvede finančno transakcijo, in ne bi smeli biti del podatkov, shranjenih v ETIAS.
The payment should be managed by a bank or a financial intermediary.
Večina potovalnih odobritev bi morala biti izdana v nekaj minutah, pri manjšem številu pa bi postopek lahko trajal dlje, zlasti v izjemnih primerih.
The data required for securing the electronic payment should only be provided to the bank or financial intermediary operating the financial transaction and not form part of data stored in ETIAS.
V takih izjemnih primerih bo morda potrebno od prosilca zahtevati dodatne informacije ali dokumentacijo, jih obdelati ter prosilca po preučitvi informacij in dokumentacije, ki jih je predložil, povabiti na razgovor.
Most of the travel authorisations should be issued within minutes, though a reduced number could require longer, especially in exceptional cases.
Razgovor bi bilo treba opraviti le kot skrajni ukrep v izjemnih okoliščinah in kadar ostajajo resni dvomi glede informacij ali dokumentacije, ki jih je predložil prosilec.
In such exceptional cases, it may be necessary to request additional information or documentation from the applicant, to process that additional information or documentation and, following examination of the information or documentation provided by the applicant, to invite him or her to an interview.
Zaradi izjemnega značaja razgovorov bi moralo biti nanje povabljenih manj kot 0,1 % prosilcev.
Interviews should only be conducted in exceptional circumstances, as a last resort and when serious doubts remain regarding the information or documentation provided by the applicant.
Število prosilcev, ki se jih povabi na razgovor, bi morala redno pregledovati Komisija.
The exceptional nature of interviews should lead to less than 0,1 % of applicants being invited to an interview.
Osebne podatke, ki jih predloži prosilec, bi bilo treba v okviru ETIAS obdelovati zgolj za namene ocene, ali bi vstop prosilca v Unijo lahko predstavljal tveganje za varnost ali nezakonito priseljevanje oziroma visoko tveganje za epidemijo v Uniji.
The number of applicants invited to an interview should be subject to regular review by the Commission.
Ocene takih tveganj ni mogoče izvesti brez obdelave osebnih podatkov, ki jih je treba navesti v prošnji za potovalno odobritev.
The personal data provided by the applicant should be processed by ETIAS for the sole purposes of assessing whether the entry of the applicant into the Union could pose a security, illegal immigration or high epidemic risk in the Union.
Osebne podatke v prošnjah bi bilo treba primerjati s podatki v evidenci, dosjeju ali razpisu ukrepa v informacijskem sistemu ali podatkovni zbirki EU (centralni sistem ETIAS, SIS, vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS), sistem vstopa/izstopa (SVI) ali Eurodac), med podatki Europola ali v Interpolovih podatkovnih zbirkah (Interpolova podatkovna zbirka o ukradenih in izgubljenih potnih listinah (SLTD) ali Interpolova podatkovna zbirka potnih listin, povezanih z razpisi ukrepov (TDAWN)).
The assessment of such risks cannot be carried out without processing the personal data to be provided in a travel authorisation application.
Osebne podatke v prošnjah bi bilo treba primerjati tudi z nadzornim seznamom ETIAS in s specifičnimi kazalniki tveganja.