natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission had initiated the investigation on 11 August 2017 by publishing a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union (‘the Notice of Initiation’) following a complaint lodged on 30 June 2017 by the coalition against unfair tyres imports (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of new and retreaded tyres for buses or lorries.
Komisija je 11. avgusta 2017 z objavo obvestila o začetku v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku) začela preiskavo na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 30. junija 2017 vložila koalicija proti nepoštenemu uvozu pnevmatik (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje novih in protektiranih pnevmatik za avtobuse ali tovornjake v Uniji.
The Commission made imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC subject to registration by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/163.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2018/163 uvedla obvezno registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK.
The registration of imports ceased with the entry into force of the provisional measures on 8 May 2018.
Registracija uvoza je prenehala 8. maja 2018 z začetkom veljavnosti začasnih ukrepov.
As stated in recital (10) of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 (‘the investigation period’) and the examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2014 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 10 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2016 do 30. junija 2017 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave), proučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, pa je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2014 do konca obdobja preiskave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
Following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties, the complainant, the ‘China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers and Exporters’ (‘the CCCMC’), the China Rubber Industry Association (‘the CRIA’), five Chinese exporting producers, five unrelated importers, a Union importers association l'Association Française des Importateurs de Pneumatiques (‘AFIP’) and one Union supplier (‘Kraiburg’) made written submissions commenting on the provisional findings.
Po uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev so pritožnik, „kitajska gospodarska zbornica uvoznikov in izvoznikov kovin, rud in kemikalij“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zbornica CCCMC), združenje kitajske gumarske industrije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: združenje CRIA), pet kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, pet nepovezanih uvoznikov, združenje uvoznikov Unije l'Association Française des Importateurs de Pneumatiques (v nadaljnjem besedilu: združenje AFIP) in en dobavitelj iz Unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Kraiburg) predložili pisne pripombe glede začasnih ugotovitev.
One interested party, Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH (‘Hämmerling’), submitted additional comments on the provisional findings on 2 July 2018, well after the deadline to submit comments on the provisional disclosure.
Ena zainteresirana stran, družba Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Hämmerling), je dodatne pripombe glede začasnih ugotovitev predložila 2. julija 2018, precej po roku za predložitev pripomb glede začasnega razkritja.
The Commission addressed them together with other comments received on the General Disclosure Document at the definitive stage.
Komisija jih je obravnavala v zaključni fazi skupaj z drugimi pripombami, prejetimi glede dokumenta o dokončnem razkritju.
Interested parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.
Zaslišanje je bilo odobreno vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so to zahtevale.
Hearings took place with the CCCMC and the CRIA; all the sampled exporting producers: the Aeolus Group, Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd (‘Pirelli’) and the related importer Prometeon Tyre Group S.r.l.
Zaslišanja so potekala z zbornico CCCMC in združenjem CRIA, vsemi vzorčenimi proizvajalci izvozniki: skupino Aeolus Group, družbo Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Pirelli) in povezanim uvoznikom Prometeon Tyre Group S.r.l.
(‘Prometeon’), the Giti Group, the Hankook Group, and the Xingyuan Group; two unrelated importers and Union producers, associations and Union tread and repairing material suppliers supporting the measures.
(v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupina Prometeon), skupino Giti Group, skupino Hankook Group in skupino Xingyuan Group, dvema nepovezanima uvoznikoma in proizvajalci Unije, združenji ter dobavitelji materiala za tekalno plast in popravila iz Unije, ki podpirajo ukrepe.
The Commission considered the comments submitted by interested parties, analysed them, and, where appropriate, modified the provisional findings.
Komisija je obravnavala pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, jih analizirala in po potrebi spremenila začasne ugotovitve.
In order to verify the questionnaires replies which were not verified at the provisional stage of the procedure, verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following parties:
Da bi se preverili izpolnjeni vprašalniki, ki niso bili preverjeni v začasni fazi postopka, so bili opravljeni preveritveni obiski v prostorih naslednjih strani:
Unrelated importers in the Union:
pri nepovezanih uvoznikih v Uniji:
Heuver Bandengroothandel BV, the Netherlands (‘Heuver’)
Heuver Bandengroothandel B.V, Nizozemska (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Heuver),
Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Germany;
Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Nemčija;
Related importers in the Union:
pri povezanih uvoznikih v Uniji:
Following final disclosure, a verification visit was carried out at the premises of Roline NV, a Union producer in the Netherlands.
Po končnem razkritju je bil opravljen preveritveni obisk v prostorih družbe Roline N.V., proizvajalca Unije na Nizozemskem.
The Commission informed all interested parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tyres for buses and lorries (‘the final disclosure’) and to definitively collect the amounts secured by way of provisional duty.
Komisija je vse zainteresirane strani obvestila o ključnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih pnevmatik za avtobuse in tovornjake (v nadaljnjem besedilu: končno razkritje) in dokončno pobrati zneske, zavarovane z začasno dajatvijo.
All interested parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the final disclosure.
Za vse zainteresirane strani je bil določen rok, v katerem so lahko predložile pripombe h končnemu razkritju.
The complainant, the Chinese exporting producers (Aeolus Group, Giti Group, Hankook Group, Pirelli and its related importer Prometeon), industry associations (the CRIA, the CCCMC, the Associazione Italiana Ricostruttori Pneumatici, the Assoiaçao Nacional de Industriais de Recauchtagem de Pneus, Bipaver, Bundesverband Reifenhandel und Vulkaniseur-Handwerk, the Czech Retread Tire Manufacturers Association, the Retread Manufacturing Association), importers (Hämmerling and Kirkby Tyres Ltd), retreader producer (Rula-BRW) and retreaders raw material suppliers (Vipal, Kraiburg, RemaTipTop) submitted written submissions.
Pritožnik, kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki (skupina Aeolus Group, skupina Giti Group, skupina Hankook Group, družba Pirelli in njen povezani uvoznik skupina Prometeon), industrijska združenja (združenje CRIA, zbornica CCCMC, italijansko združenje za protektiranje Associazione Italiana Ricostruttori Pneumatici, portugalsko nacionalno združenje industrije protektiranja Assoiaçao Nacional de Industriais de Recauchtagem de Pneus, združenje izvajalcev protektiranja Bipaver, nemško združenje izvajalcev protektiranja Bundesverband Reifenhandel und Vulkaniseur-Handwerk, češko združenje izvajalcev protektiranja Czech Retread Tire Manufacturers Association in združenje Retread Manufacturing Association), uvozniki (družbi Hämmerling in Kirkby Tyres Ltd), izvajalec protektiranja (družba Rula-BRW) in dobavitelji surovin za izvajalce protektiranja (družbe Vipal, Kraiburg in RemaTipTop) so predložili pisne pripombe.
Following final disclosure, hearings were held with the CRIA and the CCCMC, the Aeolus Group, the Giti Group, Prometeon, the complainant and Bipaver.
Po končnem razkritju so se izvedla zaslišanja z združenjem CRIA in zbornico CCCMC, skupino Aeolus Group, skupino Giti Group, družbo Prometeon, pritožnikom in združenjem Bipaver.
The Hearing Officer organised hearings at the request of Hankook Group on 16 August 2018 and Hämmerling on 29 August 2018.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje je 16. avgusta 2018 organiziral zaslišanje na zahtevo skupine Hankook Group, 29. avgusta 2018 pa na zahtevo družbe Hämmerling.
On 10 September 2018, the Commission submitted to all interested parties an additional final disclosure limited to the specific issue of the level of the tier 3 target profit.
Komisija je 10. septembra 2018 vsem zainteresiranim stranem predložila dodatno končno razkritje, omejeno na posebno vprašanje stopnje ciljnega dobička v tretjem razredu.
All interested parties were granted a period of three days within which they could make comments on the additional final disclosure document.
Za vse zainteresirane strani je bil določen tridnevni rok, v katerem so lahko predložile pripombe v zvezi z dodatnim dokumentom o končnem razkritju.
The complainant, the Chinese exporting producers (Aeolus Group, Giti Group, Pirelli and its related importer Prometeon, Xingyuan), industry associations (the CRIA, the CCCMC, the Associazione Italiana Ricostruttori Pneumatici, Bipaver, Bundesverband Reifenhandel und Vulkaniseur-Handwerk, the Czech Retread Tire Manufacturers Association, ITMA Europe, the Retread Manufacturing Association), importers (Hämmerling, Heuver and Kirkby Tyres Ltd), a retreader (Rula-BRW), an association of users (Lithuanian National Road Carriers' Association LINAVA) and a raw material supplier to retreaders (Kraiburg) submitted written comments.
Pritožnik, kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki (skupina Aeolus Group, skupina Giti Group, družba Pirelli in njen povezani uvoznik skupina Prometeon, skupina Xingyuan Group), industrijska združenja (združenje CRIA, zbornica CCCMC, združenja Associazione Italiana Ricostruttori Pneumatici, Bipaver, Bundesverband Reifenhandel und Vulkaniseur-Handwerk in Czech Retread Tire Manufacturers Association, mednarodno združenje proizvajalcev pnevmatik ITMA Europe in združenje Retread Manufacturing Association), uvozniki (družbe Hämmerling, Heuver in Kirkby Tyres Ltd), izvajalec protektiranja (družba Rula-BRW), združenje uporabnikov (Lithuanian National Road Carriers' Association LINAVA) in dobavitelj surovin za izvajalce protektiranja (družba Kraiburg) so predložili pisne pripombe.
Following the additional final disclosure, a hearing was held with Prometeon on 14 September 2018.
Po dodatnem končnem razkritju je bilo 14. septembra 2018 organizirano zaslišanje s skupino Prometeon.
The comments submitted by interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani so se proučile in upoštevale, kadar je bilo to primerno.
Following the publication of the provisional Regulation, Pirelli pointed out that Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd was not a subsidiary of the Aeolus Group as incorrectly stated in recital (119) of the provisional Regulation.
Družba Pirelli je po objavi začasne uredbe poudarila, da družba Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd, ni podrejena družba skupine Aeolus Group, kot je napačno navedeno v uvodni izjavi 119 začasne uredbe.
It explained that Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd is an autonomous company from Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd and the Aeolus Group.
Pojasnila je, da je Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd, družba, ki je neodvisna od družbe Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd, in skupine Aeolus Group.
Acknowledging its error, the Commission issued a corrigendum on 10 July 2018.
Komisija je priznala napako in 10. julija 2018 objavila popravek.
Concerning the reference to the Aeolus Group, the Commission noted that its investigation deals with companies or groups of related companies.
Kar zadeva sklicevanje na skupino Aeolus Group, je Komisija opozorila, da njena preiskava obravnava družbe ali skupine povezanih družb.
The relationship between exporting producers is analysed in accordance with Article 127 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447.
Razmerje med proizvajalci izvozniki je analizirano v skladu s členom 127 Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2447.
Therefore, in the context of this investigation, Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd and Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd are considered to be related since both had a common shareholder during the investigation period — namely China National Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd (‘CNRC’).
Zato se v okviru te preiskave za družbi Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd, in Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd, šteje, da sta povezani, saj sta imeli v obdobju preiskave skupnega delničarja – družbo China National Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba CNRC).
The use of shortened form ‘the Aeolus Group’ was for ease of reference to related companies throughout the provisional Regulation.
Skrajšana oblika „skupina Aeolus Group“ se je v začasni uredbi uporabljala zaradi lažjega sklicevanja na povezane družbe.
The shortened form ‘the Aeolus Group’ was chosen because Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd is the biggest producing entity within the related companies.
Ta skrajšana oblika je bila izbrana, ker je družba Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd, največji proizvodni subjekt med povezanimi družbami.
Despite the use of the short form to reference the Aeolus Group in the provisional Regulation, the dumping margin was calculated separately for each related exporting producer and then a single weighted average dumping margin was established for all the related companies.
Kljub uporabi kratke oblike za sklicevanje na skupino Aeolus Group v začasni uredbi je bila stopnja dampinga izračunana posebej za vsakega povezanega proizvajalca izvoznika, nato pa je bila za vse povezane družbe določena enotna tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga.
Following final disclosure, Pirelli claimed that it should not be considered as a related company of CNRC and the Aeolus Group.
Po končnem razkritju je družba Pirelli trdila, da je ne bi smeli šteti za povezano družbo družbe CNRC in skupine Aeolus Group.
Pirelli disagreed with the application of Article 127 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 for the purpose of calculating a weighted average dumping margin established for the related companies.
Družba Pirelli se ni strinjala z uporabo člena 127 Uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 za namene izračuna tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga, ki je bila določena za povezane družbe.
Pirelli proposed the use of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 (the ‘basic Regulation’) to establish the relation between companies.
Za določitev povezave med družbami je predlagala uporabo člena 4 Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba).
The Commission recalled that Article 4 of the basic Regulation concerns the definition of the Union industry and the relationship of Union producers to exporting producers.
Komisija je spomnila, da člen 4 osnovne uredbe obravnava opredelitev industrije Unije in povezave proizvajalcev Unije s proizvajalci izvozniki.
In that context, a Union producer is not considered part of the Union industry, if it is controlled by an exporting producer.
V okviru tega se ne šteje, da je proizvajalec Unije del industrije Unije, če je pod nadzorom proizvajalca izvoznika.
However, Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation explicitly refers to Article 127 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 in order to determine whether two parties are associated for the purpose of establishing a dumping margin.
Vendar se člen 2(1) osnovne uredbe izrecno sklicuje na člen 127 Uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 pri določanju, ali sta dve strani povezani, za namene določitve stopnje dampinga.
Examining whether parties are associated ensures that anti-dumping measures are enforced effectively.
Preverjanje, ali so strani povezane, zagotavlja učinkovito izvajanje protidampinških ukrepov.
In particular, it avoids the risk that exports are channelled through a related company with a lower anti-dumping duty.
Zlasti preprečuje tveganje, da bi izvoz potekal prek povezane družbe z nižjo protidampinško dajatvijo.
In addition, the Notice of Initiation clearly referred to Article 127 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 at the start of the proceeding.
Poleg tega se je na začetku postopka obvestilo o začetku jasno sklicevalo na člen 127 Uredbe (EU) 2015/2447.
According to Article 127(d) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 two persons are deemed to be related if: a third party directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds 5 % or more of the outstanding voting stock or shares of both of them.
V skladu s členom 127(d) Uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 se osebi štejeta za povezani, če tretja oseba neposredno ali posredno poseduje, nadzoruje ali ima v lasti 5 % ali več deležev z glasovalno pravico ali delnic obeh oseb.
CNRC is the largest shareholder of Pirelli.
Družba CNRC je največji delničar družbe Pirelli.
During the investigation period, CNRC owned 65 % of Pirelli's shares.
V obdobju preiskave je imela družba CNRC v lasti 65 % delnic družbe Pirelli.
As of September 2018, it still held 46 % of Pirelli's shares.
Septembra 2018 je imela še vedno v lasti 46 % delnic družbe Pirelli.
Therefore, in the context of this investigation, Pirelli and the Aeolus Group are considered to be related through a common parent company (CNRC).
Zato se v okviru te preiskave šteje, da sta družba Pirelli in skupina Aeolus Group povezani prek skupne matične družbe (družba CNRC).
Pirelli 's claim that it should not be considered as a related company of CNRC or to the Aeolus Group was thus rejected.
Trditev družbe Pirelli, da je ne bi smeli šteti za povezano družbo družbe CNRC ali skupine Aeolus Group, je bila zato zavrnjena.
Following final disclosure, Pirelli further claimed that it should be considered only as a cooperating party, and not as exporting producer, since it stopped producing the product concerned in November 2017.
Družba Pirelli je po končnem razkritju trdila tudi, da je ne bi smeli šteti za proizvajalca izvoznika, ampak le za sodelujočo stranko, saj je novembra 2017 prenehala proizvajati zadevni izdelek.
The Commission established that Pirelli was an exporting producer during the period under investigation.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bila družba Pirelli v obdobju preiskave proizvajalec izvoznik.
The fact that subsequently Pirelli ceased the production does not alter that fact.
Dejstvo, da je družba Pirelli kasneje prenehala proizvodnjo, tega ne spremeni.
That claim was therefore rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Several interested parties claimed that the Commission's provisional disclosure was insufficient, thus affecting their rights of defence and asked the Commission to make further clarifications and disclosure and reiterated the same concerns following final disclosure.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da je bilo začasno razkritje Komisije nezadostno in je zato vplivalo na njihove pravice do obrambe, ter zahtevalo, naj Komisija predloži dodatna pojasnila in razkritje, ter enake pomisleke ponovilo po končnem razkritju.
The Commission considered that the open file and the provisional Regulation already contained sufficient information allowing all interested parties to fully exercise their rights of defence.
Komisija je menila, da že javna dokumentacija in začasna uredba vsebujeta dovolj informacij, da lahko vse zainteresirane strani v celoti uveljavljajo svoje pravice do obrambe.
Nevertheless, a note for the file providing clarifications on the provisional Regulation was included in the open file before the definitive disclosure and some additional clarifications concerning the data underlying the individual dumping calculations were provided to two exporting producers.
Kljub temu je bilo v javno dokumentacijo pred dokončnim razkritjem vključeno obvestilo v zvezi z dokumentacijo s pojasnili o začasni uredbi, dvema proizvajalcema izvoznikoma pa je bilo predloženih nekaj dodatnih pojasnil v zvezi s podatki, na katerih sta temeljila individualna izračuna dampinga.
The Commission noted that the CRIA and the CCCMC stated that the Commission failed to disclose detailed information on the undercutting and underselling calculations to them and to the Chinese exporters, thereby depriving them of any possibility to check potential mistakes made by the Commission or to comment on certain aspects of those calculations.
Komisija je ugotovila, da sta združenje CRIA in zbornica CCCMC trdila, da Komisija njima in kitajskim izvoznikom ni razkrila podrobnih informacij o izračunih nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih in ciljnih cen, zaradi česar niso mogli preveriti, ali se je Komisija morda zmotila, ali podati pripomb glede nekaterih vidikov teh izračunov.
The CRIA, the CCCMC, and the Chinese exporters received all information respecting their procedural rights.
Združenje CRIA, zbornica CCCMC in kitajski izvozniki so glede na svoje procesne pravice prejeli vse informacije.
The Chinese sampled exporters received the list of the product control numbers (‘PCNs’) sold, the unit sales price and a range of the total sales volume involved.
Vzorčeni kitajski izvozniki so prejeli seznam kontrolnih številk izdelka v prodaji, prodajno ceno na enoto in razpon celotnega obsega zadevne prodaje.
As stated in recitals (45) to (49), the Commission must not reveal any information which is deemed confidential upon good cause being shown without the specific permission from the supplier of such information.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od 45 do 49, Komisija ne sme razkriti nobenih informacij, ki se na podlagi predloženih ustreznih razlogov štejejo za zaupne, razen če oseba, ki je zagotovila informacije, tega izrecno ne dovoli.
The Aeolus Group claimed that a determination of injury for purposes of Article VI of GATT 1994 should be based on positive evidence and involve an objective examination of both (a) the volume of the dumped imports and the effect of the dumped imports on prices in the domestic market for like products; and (b) the consequent impact of these imports on domestic producers of such products.
Skupina Aeolus Group je trdila, da bi moralo ugotavljanje škode za namene člena VI GATT iz leta 1994 temeljiti na pozitivnih dokazih ter vključuje objektivno proučitev (a) obsega dumpinškega uvoza in učinka tega uvoza na cene podobnih izdelkov na domačem trgu in (b) posledičnega vpliva tega uvoza na domače proizvajalce takih izdelkov.
It considered that the Commission should not base its decisions on vague elements or on confidential data supplied by the parties but on all the information and objective facts available.
Menila je, da odločitve Komisije ne bi smele temeljiti na nejasnih elementih ali zaupnih podatkih, ki so jih predložile strani, ampak na vseh razpoložljivih informacijah in objektivnih dejstvih.
The requirement of ‘objective examination’ implies that the domestic industry and the effects of dumped imports must be investigated in an unbiased manner, without favouring the interests of any interested party, or group of interested parties, in the investigation.
Zahteva glede „objektivne proučitve“ pomeni, da je treba domačo industrijo in učinke dampinškega uvoza preiskati nepristransko, ne da bi pri tem v preiskavi dajali prednost interesom katere koli zainteresirane strani ali skupine zainteresiranih strani.
According to the Aeolus Group, most of the data in the proceedings remained confidential, thus hindering the exercise of the right of defence by interested parties.
Po mnenju skupine Aeolus Group je večina podatkov v tem postopku ostala zaupna, kar je zainteresirane strani oviralo pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe.