natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For two exporting producers the analysis of domestic sales showed that less than 80 % of all domestic sales were profitable.
Za dva proizvajalca izvoznika je analiza domače prodaje pokazala, da je bilo dobičkonosnih manj kot 80 % celotne domače prodaje.
Accordingly, for these two exporting producers the normal value was calculated as a weighted average of the profitable sales only.
V skladu s tem se je normalna vrednost za ta dva proizvajalca izvoznika izračunala kot tehtano povprečje zgolj dobičkonosne prodaje.
One party argued that its entity producing PTA forms a single economic entity with its related main raw material supplier.
Ena stran je trdila, da njen subjekt, ki proizvaja PTA, tvori enoten gospodarski subjekt z njegovim povezanim dobaviteljem glavne surovine.
The related supplier also pays dividends to the sampled PTA producer.
Povezani dobavitelj vzorčenemu proizvajalcu PTA tudi izplačuje dividende.
The Commission should therefore deduct the profit realised by the related supplier on the raw material sold to the sampled PTA producer for the production of PTA for the purpose of the dumping calculation.
Zato bi morala Komisija za izračun dampinga odšteti dobiček, ki ga je ustvaril povezani dobavitelj v zvezi s surovino, prodano vzorčenemu proizvajalcu PTA za proizvodnjo PTA.
The company had calculated the profit to be deducted as the difference between the purchase price and the total cost of production of the raw material.
Družba je izračunala dobiček, ki se odšteje kot razlika med nakupno ceno in skupnimi stroški proizvodnje surovine.
The Commission rejected the claim that the sampled PTA producer and the related raw material supplier form a single economic entity for the following reasons.
Komisija je iz naslednjih razlogov zavrnila trditev, da vzorčeni proizvajalec PTA in z njim povezani dobavitelj surovin tvorita en gospodarski subjekt.
First, the investigation confirmed that the sampled PTA producer does not hold a majority stake in the related supplier which means that it does not have sole decision-making power over the related supplier.
Prvič, preiskava je pokazala, da vzorčeni proizvajalec PTA nima večinskega deleža v povezanem dobavitelju, kar pomeni, da nima izključne pristojnosti odločanja o povezanem dobavitelju.
Second, since the sales of the raw material represented only a minor part of the total sales of the related raw material supplier during the investigation period, there is no direct link between the profit margin for the raw material and the dividends received.
Drugič, ker je prodaja surovin predstavljala le majhen del celotne prodaje povezanega dobavitelja surovin v obdobju preiskave, ni neposredne povezave med stopnjo dobička za surovine in prejetimi dividendami.
Third, the related supplier does not sell the raw material exclusively to the sampled PTA producer, but also to other clients.
Tretjič, povezani dobavitelj ne prodaja surovine izključno vzorčenemu proizvajalcu PTA, temveč tudi drugim strankam.
In addition, it also sells a number of other products to other clients.
Poleg tega drugim strankam prodaja tudi številne druge izdelke.
Thus, there is no direct link between the sales of the raw material by the related supplier to the sampled PTA producer and the dividends it pays to the sampled PTA producer.
Zato ne obstaja nikakršna neposredna zveza med prodajo surovine s strani povezanega dobavitelja vzorčenemu proizvajalcu PTA in dividendami, ki jih izplačuje vzorčenemu proizvajalcu PTA.
Fourth, the sampled PTA producer buys the raw material from the related supplier at prices including profit.
Četrtič, vzorčeni proizvajalec PTA nabavlja surovine od povezanega dobavitelja po cenah, ki vključujejo dobiček.
These prices are in line with prices at which it purchases the same raw material from other unrelated suppliers.
Te cene so usklajene s cenami, po katerih kupuje isto surovino od drugih nepovezanih dobaviteljev.
Fifth, the annual financial statements of the sampled PTA producer are not consolidated with the financial statements of the related supplier.
Petič, letni računovodski izkazi vzorčenega proizvajalca PTA se ne konsolidirajo z računovodskimi izkazi povezanega dobavitelja.
On the basis of the above, the claim that the sampled PTA producer forms a single economic entity with the related raw material supplier was rejected.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bila trditev, da vzorčeni proizvajalec PTA tvori enoten gospodarski subjekt s povezanim dobaviteljem surovin, zavrnjena.
Consequently the percentage of the profit charged by the related supplier to the sampled PTA producer was not deducted from the purchase price.
Zato odstotek dobička, ki ga je povezani dobavitelj zaračunal vzorčenemu proizvajalcu PTA, ni bil odštet od nabavne cene.
After disclosure two interested parties questioned why the Commission did not apply a target profit in order to define the proportion of profitable sales on domestic market in determining normal value.
Po razkritju sta se dve zainteresirani strani spraševali, zakaj Komisija pri določanju normalne vrednosti za opredelitev deleža dobičkonosne prodaje na domačem trgu ni uporabila ciljnega dobička.
In accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation, the relevant benchmark for transactions being profitable is the unit production costs (fixed and variable) plus selling, general and administrative costs.
V skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe so ustrezno referenčno merilo za dobičkonosnost transakcij proizvodni stroški na enoto (stalni in spremenljivi), h katerim se dodajo še zneski prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih stroškov.
The concept of target profit is not relevant in this context and therefore this claim was rejected.
Pojem ciljni dobiček v tem okviru ni pomemben, zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
The same parties also questioned why the Commission did not perform the analysis of the proportion of profitable sales on a monthly basis.
Isti strani sta se spraševali tudi, zakaj Komisija ni opravila analize deleža dobičkonosne prodaje na mesečni osnovi.
The investigation did not establish any grounds why the analysis of the profitable sales or determination of the normal value should deviate from the standard methodology, which is using the weighted average of the normal value based on the transactions which took place during the entire investigation period.
Med preiskavo niso bili odkriti razlogi, zaradi katerih bi morala analiza dobičkonosne prodaje ali določitev normalne vrednosti odstopati od standardne metodologije, pri kateri se uporablja tehtano povprečje normalne vrednosti, ki temelji na transakcijah, opravljenih v celotnem obdobju preiskave.
The sampled exporting producers exported to the Union either directly to independent customers or through unrelated and related trading companies located outside the Union.
Vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki so v Unijo izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam ali prek nepovezanih in povezanih trgovskih družb zunaj Unije.
In case the exporting producers exported the product concerned directly to independent customers in the Union, the export price was the price actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Če so proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe cena, ki se je dejansko plačevala ali se plačuje za zadevni izdelek, ko se proda za izvoz v Unijo.
In case the exporting producers exported the product concerned to the Union through related companies, the export price was established on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Če so proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek v Unijo izvažali prek povezanih družb, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek prvič preprodan neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
In case the exporting producers exported the product concerned through unrelated trading companies located outside of the Union it was first established that sales to the unrelated trading companies were indeed sales for export to the Union.
Če so proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek izvažali prek nepovezanih trgovskih družb s sedežem zunaj Unije, je bilo najprej ugotovljeno, ali je bila prodaja nepovezanim trgovskim družbam res prodaja za izvoz v Unijo.
In this case the export price was, as well, the price actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
V tem primeru je bila v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe izvozna cena prav tako tista, ki se je dejansko plačevala ali se plačuje za zadevni izdelek ob prodaji za izvoz v Unijo.
Adjustments were made for transport, insurance, handling and loading, packing, bank charges, credit costs and commissions.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za stroške prevoza, zavarovanja, manipulativne stroške in stroške natovarjanja, stroške pakiranja, bančne stroške ter stroške kreditov in provizij.
For the sampled exporting producers, the Commission compared the weighted average normal value of each type of the like product with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike primerjala tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost vsake vrste podobnega izdelka s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe.
On this basis, the weighted average dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Na podlagi tega so tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
The five cooperating exporting producers referred to in recital 7 represented all exports originating in the Republic of Korea to the Union during the investigation period based on Eurostat data, and the three sampled exporting producers represented more than 75 % of the total exports to the Union during the investigation period.
Na podlagi podatkov Eurostata je pet sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz uvodne izjave 7 predstavljalo celoten izvoz s poreklom iz Republike Koreje v Unijo v obdobju preiskave, trije vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki pa so predstavljali več kot 75 % celotnega izvoza v Unijo v obdobju preiskave.
The Commission took into consideration the high level of cooperation, the high level of representativeness of the sample referred to in recital 52 above and also the fact that only one of the sampled exporters had a dumping margin above de minimis as referred to in Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je upoštevala visoko raven sodelovanja, visoko raven reprezentativnosti vzorca, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 52, pa tudi dejstvo, da je bila samo za enega od vzorčenih izvoznikov stopnja dampinga višja od praga de minimis iz člena 9(3) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, in order to assess whether the dumping margin for the exporting producers outside the sample was below de minimis, a weighted average countrywide dumping margin was established.
Zato je bila določena tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga na ravni države, da se je ocenilo, ali je stopnja dampinga za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, pod stopnjo de minimis.
It was found that this margin was below de minimis level, namely 0,8 %.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je navedena stopnja 0,8 %, kar je pod pragom de minimis, in sicer.
After disclosure two interested parties questioned why the dumping margin established for Hanwha (3,5 %) was not applied to the two cooperating but non-sampled exporting producers.
Po razkritju sta se dve zainteresirani strani spraševali, zakaj stopnja dampinga, določena za Hanwha (3,5 %), ni bila uporabljena za sodelujoča vendar nevzorčena proizvajalca izvoznika.
As explained in recital 53 above, the Commission took into consideration the high level of cooperation, the high level of representativeness of the sample and also the fact that only one of the sampled exporters had a dumping margin above de minimis.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 53, je Komisija upoštevala visoko raven sodelovanja, visoko raven reprezentativnosti vzorca in dejstvo, da je bila samo za enega od vzorčenih izvoznikov stopnja dampinga višja od praga de minimis.
In the light of this, the Commission considered that the most reasonable estimate for the dumping margin for the cooperating but non-sampled exporting producers and for the countrywide dumping margin should be established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price for the sampled exporting producers as described above.
Glede na to je Komisija menila, da bi bilo treba najbolj razumno oceno stopnje dampinga za sodelujoče vendar nevzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike in stopnje dampinga na ravni države določiti na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike, kot je opisano zgoraj.
It is also recalled that the same methodology was applied in a similar case previously [3].
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da je bila ista metodologija že uporabljena v podobni zadevi [3].
After disclosure one interested party claimed that there were differences between the South Korean export statistics and the Eurostat import statistics.
Po razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran trdila, da obstajajo razlike med korejskimi statističnimi podatki o izvozu in statističnimi podatki Eurostata o uvozu.
Further, in the light of this, this party questioned the reliability of the data provided by the exporting producers and used by the Commission in order to determine the dumping margin.
Poleg tega je zato ta stran podvomila v zanesljivost podatkov, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci izvozniki in jih je Komisija uporabila za določitev stopnje dampinga.
The Commission confirmed that following the established practise and as explained in recital 52 above, the exports originating in the Republic of Korea to the Union during the investigation period were based on Eurostat data.
Komisija je potrdila, da je po uveljavljeni praksi in kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 52, uvoz s poreklom iz Republike Koreje v Unijo v obdobju preiskave temeljil na podatkih Eurostata.
It is also recalled that as explained in recital 13 above, the Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of dumping, and that the data provided by the exporting producers was duly verified in accordance with the established practise.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 13, da je Komisija zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za ugotovitev dampinga, in da so bili podatki, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci izvozniki, ustrezno preverjeni v skladu z uveljavljeno prakso.
After disclosure one interested party presented different hypotheses and alternative scenarios concerning the relationship between the normal value and the export price and questioned whether applying constructed export price and normal values on the basis of these scenarios would have resulted in different dumping margins.
Po razkritju je ena od zainteresiranih strani predložila drugačno predpostavko in alternativne scenarije v zvezi z razmerjem med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno ter se spraševala, ali bi uporaba konstruirane izvozne cene in normalnih vrednosti na podlagi teh scenarijev privedla do drugačnih stopenj dampinga.
The Commission recalled that the dumping calculations were based on actual verified transaction data and that they must be established using the methodology laid down in Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je opozorila, da so izračuni dampinga temeljili na dejanskih preverjenih podatkih o transakcijah ter da jih je treba določiti z uporabo metodologije, določene v členu 2 osnovne uredbe.
The alternative scenarios presented by this interested party were not in accordance with the basic Regulation and therefore they were rejected.
Alternativni scenariji, ki jih je predstavila ta zainteresirana stran, niso bili v skladu z osnovno uredbo in so bili zato zavrnjeni.
In view of the countrywide de minimis dumping margin, measures on imports of PTA originating in the Republic of Korea should not be imposed.
Glede na stopnjo dampinga de minimis na ravni države ni treba uvesti ukrepov na uvoz PTA s poreklom iz Republike Koreje.
After the disclosure, one interested party questioned the reasons for increase of the exports originating in the Republic of Korea to the Union from 2012.
Po razkritju se je ena od zainteresiranih strani spraševala o razlogih za povečanje izvoza s poreklom iz Republike Koreje v Unijo od leta 2012.
As explained above, in the view of the findings with respect to dumping it was not considered necessary to present any analysis on injury.
Kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, se glede na ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom šteje, da analize o škodi ni treba predstaviti.
Therefore this request was rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
In accordance with Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation, the proceeding should therefore be terminated as the dumping margin determined for the Republic of Korea is less than 2 %.
V skladu s členom 9(3) osnovne uredbe je zato treba postopek zaključiti, saj znaša ugotovljena stopnja dampinga za Republiko Korejo manj kot 2 %.
In light of all the above, the Commission therefore concluded that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of purified terephthalic acid and its salts originating in the Republic of Korea should be terminated without the imposition of anti-dumping measures.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je Komisija zato sklenila, da se protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom prečiščene tereftalne kisline in njenih soli s poreklom iz Republike Koreje v Unijo zaključi brez uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 –
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of terephthalic acid of a purity by weight of 99,5 % or more and its salts currently falling within CN code ex29173600 (TARIC code 2917360010) and originating in the Republic of Korea is hereby terminated.
Protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom tereftalne kisline s čistočo najmanj 99,5 mas. % in njenih soli, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznako KN ex29173600 (oznaka TARIC 2917360010), s poreklom iz Republike Koreje se zaključi.
Done at Brussels, 6 June 2017.
V Bruslju, 6. junija 2017
Council Decision (EU) 2017/971
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2017/971
of 8 June 2017
z dne 8. junija 2017
determining the planning and conduct arrangements for EU non-executive military CSDP missions and amending Decisions 2010/96/CFSP on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces, 2013/34/CFSP on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian armed forces (EUTM Mali) and (CFSP) 2016/610 on a European Union CSDP military training mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA)
o ureditvah za načrtovanje in izvajanje vojaških misij EU, v okviru SVOP, brez izvršilnih pooblastil ter o spremembi sklepov 2010/96/SZVP o vojaški misiji Evropske unije, ki prispeva k usposabljanju somalskih varnostnih sil, 2013/34/SZVP o vojaški misiji Evropske unije, ki prispeva k usposabljanju malijskih oboroženih sil (EUTM Mali) in (SZVP) 2016/610 o misiji Evropske unije za vojaško usposabljanje v okviru SVOP v Srednjeafriški republiki (EUTM RCA)
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Articles 42(4) and 43(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 42(4) in člena 43(2) Pogodbe,
The Council has determined that it is necessary to strengthen the planning and conduct of EU non-executive military missions.
Svet je ugotovil, da je treba okrepiti načrtovanje in izvajanje vojaških misij EU brez izvršilnih pooblastil.
In its conclusions of 6 March 2017, the Council agreed to establish, as a short term objective, a Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC) within the EU Military Staff (EUMS) in Brussels, which will be responsible at the strategic level for the operational planning and conduct of non-executive military missions, working under the political control and strategic direction of the Political and Security Committee (PSC).
Svet se je v sklepih z dne 6. marca 2017 dogovoril, da bo kot kratkoročni cilj v sklopu Vojaškega štaba EU v Bruslju vzpostavil vojaško zmogljivost za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MPCC), ki bo na strateški ravni odgovorna za operativno načrtovanje in izvajanje vojaških misij brez izvršilnih pooblastil ter bo delovala pod političnim nadzorom in strateškim vodstvom Političnega in varnostnega odbora.
The newly created MPCC will work in parallel and in a coordinated way with the Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability, notably through a Joint Support Coordination Cell.
Na novo vzpostavljena MPCC bo delovala vzporedno in usklajeno s civilno zmogljivostjo za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij, zlasti prek skupne podporne koordinacijske celice.
In its conclusions of 6 March 2017, the Council decided that the Director General of the EUMS will be the Director of the MPCC and, in that capacity, will assume the functions of missions' commander for non-executive military missions, including the three EU training missions (EUTMs) deployed in Somalia, Mali and the Central African Republic, in line with the Terms of Reference for the Director of the MPCC.
Svet je v sklepih z dne 6. marca 2017 sklenil, da bo generalni direktor Vojaškega štaba EU direktor MPCC in da bo v tej vlogi prevzel naloge poveljnika misije pri vojaških misijah brez izvršilnih pooblastil, vključno s tremi misijami EU za usposabljanje v Somaliji, Maliju in Srednjeafriški republiki, in sicer v skladu z opisom nalog in pristojnosti direktorja MPCC.
In its conclusions of 6 March 2017, the Council also agreed to proposals on strategic foresight and oversight through which the Council, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR) and the PSC can be effectively supported, in the exercise of their respective responsibilities in relation to non-executive military missions, by the relevant European External Action Service (EEAS) crisis management structures, including through systematic interaction and coordination between the missions' commander and those structures at the strategic political level, without prejudice to the chain of command.
Svet se je v sklepih z dne 6. marca 2017 dogovoril tudi glede predlogov o strateških napovedih in nadzoru, ki omogočajo učinkovito podporo Svetu, visokemu predstavniku Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko (VP) ter Političnemu in varnostnemu odboru pri izvrševanju njihovih pristojnosti v zvezi z vojaškimi misijami brez izvršilnih pooblastil s strani ustreznih struktur Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) za krizno upravljanje, med drugim s sistematičnim povezovanjem in sodelovanjem med poveljniki misij in temi strukturami na politični ravni, brez poseganja v strukturo poveljevanja.
On 8 June 2017, the Council approved the consolidated Terms of Reference of the EUMS, including the MPCC.
Svet je 8. junija 2017 odobril konsolidiran opis nalog in pristojnosti Vojaškega štaba EU, vključno z MPCC.