natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To protect personal data and to exclude systematic searches, the processing of EES data should only take place in specific cases and when it is necessary for the purposes of preventing, detecting or investigating terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences.
Osebne podatke, ki so shranjeni v SVI, bi bilo treba v sistemu hraniti le toliko časa, kot je nujno potrebno za namene, za katere se podatki obdelujejo.
The designated authorities and Europol should only request access to the EES when they have reasonable grounds to believe that such access will provide information that will substantially assist them in preventing, detecting or investigating terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences.
Dovolj je, da se podatki v zvezi z državljani tretjih držav, ki so spoštovali roke glede trajanja dovoljenega bivanja, zaradi upravljanja meja hranijo v SVI tri leta, da državljanov tretjih držav pred iztekom navedenega obdobja ne bo treba ponovno evidentirati v SVI.
In addition, access to the EES for the purposes of identifying unknown suspects, perpetrators or victims of terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences should be allowed only on the condition that searches in the national databases of the Member State have been carried out and the search with the automated fingerprinting identification systems of all other Member States under Council Decision 2008/615/JHA [12] has been fully conducted, or the search has not been fully conducted within two days of being launched.
S triletnim obdobjem hrambe podatkov se bo zmanjšala potreba po pogostem ponovnem evidentiranju, kar bo koristilo tudi vsem potnikom, saj se bo zmanjšal povprečni čas, potreben za prehod meje, pa tudi čakalna doba na mejnih prehodih.
For the purpose of efficient comparison and exchange of personal data, Member States should fully implement and make use of the existing international agreements as well as of Union law concerning the exchange of personal data already in force, in particular Decision 2008/615/JHA.
Tudi za potnika, ki na ozemlje držav članic vstopi le enkrat, bo to, da drugih potnikov, ki so že evidentirani v SVI, pred iztekom tega triletnega obdobja hrambe podatkov ne bo treba ponovno evidentirati, pomenilo krajšo čakalno dobo na mejnem prehodu.
The personal data stored in the EES should be kept for no longer than strictly necessary for the purposes for which the data are processed.
Triletno obdobje hrambe podatkov je potrebno tudi zato, da se olajšajo in pospešijo prehodi meje, vključno z uporabo avtomatiziranih in samopostrežnih sistemov.
It is sufficient to keep the data related to third-country nationals who have respected the duration of authorised stay in the EES for a period of three years for border management purposes in order to avoid the need for third–country nationals to re-register in the EES before that period has lapsed.
Prav tako bi bilo primerno določiti triletno hrambo podatkov za državljane tretjih držav, ki jim je bil zavrnjen vstop za kratkoročno bivanje.
This three-year data retention period will reduce the need for frequent re-registrations and will be beneficial for all travellers as both the average border crossing time and the waiting time at border crossing points will decrease.
Vsak par evidenc o vstopu/izstopu državljanov tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije, za katere se uporablja Direktiva 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13], ali državljanov tretjih držav, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja v skladu s pravom Unije, in nimajo dovoljenja za prebivanje na podlagi navedene direktive, bi bilo treba hraniti največ eno leto po datumu izstopa z ozemlja držav članic, povezanega z navedeno evidenco.
Even for a traveller entering the territory of the Member States only once, the fact that other travellers already registered in the EES do not have to re-register before the expiry of this three-year data retention period will reduce the waiting time at the border crossing point.
Po izteku ustreznega obdobja hrambe podatkov bi bilo treba podatke samodejno izbrisati.
This three-year data retention period is also necessary to facilitate and expedite border crossings including by using automated and self-service systems.
Podatke o državljanih tretjih držav, ki v obdobju dovoljenega bivanja ne izstopijo z ozemlja držav članic, je treba hraniti pet let, in sicer zaradi podpore pri ugotavljanju identitete in postopku vračanja.
It is also appropriate to set a three-year data retention period for third-country nationals whose entry for a short stay has been refused.
Po petih letih bi bilo treba te podatke samodejno izbrisati, razen če obstajajo razlogi, da se jih izbriše že prej.
For third-country nationals who are members of the family of a Union citizen to whom Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [13] applies or of a third-country national enjoying the right of free movement under Union law and who do not hold a residence card pursuant to Directive 2004/38/EC, it is appropriate to store each coupled entry/exit record for a maximum period of one year after the date of the exit from the territory of the Member States linked to that record.
Osebne podatke državljanov tretjih držav, ki so spoštovali trajanje dovoljenega bivanja, in državljanov tretjih držav, ki jim je bil vstop za kratkoročno bivanje zavrnjen, je treba hraniti tri leta, osebne podatke državljanov tretjih držav, ki v obdobju dovoljenega bivanja niso izstopili z ozemlja držav članic, pa pet let, da lahko mejni policist izvede potrebno analizo tveganja, ki jo zahteva Uredba (EU) 2016/399, preden potniku dovoli vstop na ozemlje držav članic.
Following the expiry of the relevant data retention periods, the data should be automatically erased.
V okviru obdelave vlog za izdajo vizuma na konzularnih predstavništvih je treba preučiti tudi potovalno zgodovino prosilca, da se oceni uporaba predhodno izdanih vizumov in preveri, ali je spoštoval pogoje glede bivanja.
It is necessary to keep data related to third-country nationals who have not exited the territory of the Member States within the authorised period of stay for a period of five years, in order to support the identification and return process.
Žigosanje potnih listov bo nadomestil vpogled v SVI.
Those data should be automatically erased after the five–year period, unless there are grounds for erasing them earlier.
Potovalna zgodovina, ki je na voljo v SVI, bi zato morala zajemati obdobje, ki zadostuje za izdajo vizuma.
It is necessary to keep the personal data of third-country nationals who have respected the duration of authorised stay and of third-country nationals whose entry for a short stay has been refused for a period of three years and to keep the personal data of third–country nationals who have not exited the territory of the Member States within the authorised period of stay for a period of five years, to allow the border guard to conduct the necessary risk analysis required by Regulation (EU) 2016/399 before authorising a traveller to enter the territory of the Member States.
Pri izvajanju analiz tveganja na meji in pri obdelavi vlog za izdajo vizuma bi bilo treba preveriti potovalno zgodovino državljanov tretjih držav, da se ugotovi, ali so v preteklosti prekoračili najdaljše dovoljeno trajanje bivanja.
The processing of visa applications in consular posts also requires analysing the travel history of the applicant in order to assess the use of previous visas and whether the conditions of stay have been respected.
Zato je treba osebne podatke državljanov tretjih držav, ki v obdobju dovoljenega bivanja ne izstopijo z ozemlja držav članic, hraniti daljše obdobje, in sicer pet let, v primerjavi z državljani tretjih držav, ki so spoštovali trajanje dovoljenega bivanja, in državljani tretjih držav, ki jim je bil vstop za kratkoročno bivanje zavrnjen.
The abandoning of passport stamping is to be compensated by a consultation of the EES.
Določiti bi bilo treba pravila glede odgovornosti držav članic za škodo, ki bi izhajala iz kakršne koli kršitve te uredbe.
The travel history available in the EES should therefore cover a period of time which is sufficient for the purpose of visa issuance.
Brez poseganja v podrobnejša pravila glede obdelave osebnih podatkov iz te uredbe bi se za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki jo ob uporabi te uredbe izvajajo države članice, morala uporabljati Uredba (EU) 2016/679 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [14], razen če to obdelavo izvajajo imenovani organi držav članic ali centralne točke dostopa držav članic zaradi preprečevanja, preiskovanja ali odkrivanja terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj.
While conducting risk analyses at the border and while processing visa applications, the travel history of third-country nationals should be checked in order to determine whether they have exceeded the maximum duration of their authorised stay in the past.
Brez poseganja v podrobnejša pravila glede uporabe osebnih podatkov iz te uredbe se za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki jih pristojni organi držav članic obdelujejo za namene preprečevanja, preiskovanja ali odkrivanja terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj v skladu s to uredbo, uporabljajo nacionalni zakoni in predpisi, tudi upravni, sprejeti v skladu z Direktivo (EU) 2016/680.
It is thus necessary to keep the personal data of third-country nationals who have not exited the territory of the Member States within the authorised period of stay for the longer period of five years compared to that for the personal data of third-country nationals who have respected the duration of authorised stay and of third-country nationals whose entry for a short stay has been refused.
Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [15] bi se morala uporabljati za dejavnosti institucij ali organov Unije pri izvajanju njihovih nalog v vlogi odgovornega subjekta za operativno upravljanje SVI.
Rules on the liability of the Member States for damage arising from any breach of this Regulation should be laid down.
Osebni podatki, ki jih država članica pridobi v skladu s to uredbo, se ne bi smeli posredovati ali dajati na voljo kateri koli tretji državi, mednarodni organizaciji ali zasebnemu subjektu s sedežem v Uniji ali zunaj nje.
Without prejudice to more specific rules laid down in this Regulation for the processing of personal data, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council [14] should apply to the processing of personal data by the Member States in application of this Regulation unless such processing is carried out by the designated authorities or central access points of the Member States for the purposes of the prevention, investigation or detection of terrorist offences or of other serious criminal offences.
Kot izjema od tega pravila pa bi moralo biti mogoče posredovati takšne osebne podatke tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji, če je takšno posredovanje potrebno zaradi zagotavljanja pomoči pri ugotavljanju identitete državljana tretje države v zvezi z njegovo vrnitvijo in se pri tem upoštevajo strogi pogoji.
Without prejudice to more specific rules laid down in this Regulation for the processing of personal data, the national laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted pursuant to Directive (EU) 2016/680 should apply to the processing of personal data by the competent authorities of the Member States for the purposes of the prevention, investigation or detection of terrorist offences or of other serious criminal offences pursuant to this Regulation.
Če ni bil sprejet sklep o ustreznosti varstva v obliki izvedbenega akta na podlagi Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 ali ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi, ki veljajo za posredovanje v skladu z navedeno uredbo, bi moralo biti mogoče, da se za namene vračanja podatki iz SVI lahko izjemoma posredujejo tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji, samo če je to potrebno zaradi pomembnih razlogov javnega interesa, kot je določeno v navedeni uredbi.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [15] should apply to the activities of the Union institutions or bodies when carrying out their tasks as responsible for the operational management of EES.
Osebne podatke, ki jih države članice pridobijo v skladu s to uredbo, bi moralo biti mogoče posredovati tretji državi tudi v izjemno nujnem primeru, če obstaja neposredna nevarnost, povezana s terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, ali kadar obstaja neposredna nevarnost za življenje ljudi, povezana s hudim kaznivim dejanjem.
Personal data obtained by a Member State pursuant to this Regulation should not be transferred or made available to any third country, international organisation or private entity established in or outside the Union.
Neposredno nevarnost za življenje ljudi bi bilo treba razlagati tako, da vključuje nevarnost, ki je posledica hudega kaznivega dejanja, storjenega proti določeni osebi, kot je huda telesna poškodba, nedovoljena trgovina s človeškimi organi in tkivi, ugrabitev, protipraven odvzem prostosti in jemanje talcev, spolno izkoriščanje otrok in otroška pornografija ter posilstvo.
As an exception to that rule, however, it should be possible to transfer such personal data to a third country or to an international organisation where such a transfer is subject to strict conditions and necessary in individual cases in order to assist with the identification of a third-country national in relation to his or her return.
Takšne podatke bi moralo biti dovoljeno posredovali tretji državi samo, če je zagotovljeno vzajemno posredovanje informacij o evidencah o vstopu/izstopu, ki jih ima tretja država prosilka, državam članicam, ki uporabljajo SVI.
In the absence of an adequacy decision by means of implementing act pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or of appropriate safeguards to which transfers are subject pursuant to that Regulation, it should be possible to exceptionally transfer, for the purposes of return, EES data to a third country or to an international organisation, only where it is necessary for important reasons of public interest as referred to in that Regulation.
Pristojni organi držav članic, katerih imenovani organi imajo dostop do SVI v skladu s to uredbo, bi morali imeti možnost, da posredujejo podatke iz SVI državam članicam, ki ne uporabljajo SVI, in državam članicam, za katere se ne uporablja ta uredba.
It should also be possible to transfer personal data obtained by Member States pursuant to this Regulation to a third country in an exceptional case of urgency, where there is an imminent danger associated with a terrorist offence or where there is an imminent danger to the life of a person associated with a serious criminal offence.
Takšno posredovanje informacij bi moralo biti mogoče samo na podlagi ustrezno utemeljene zahteve in omejeno na primere, v katerih je potrebno zaradi preprečevanja, odkrivanja ali preiskave terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj.
An imminent danger to the life of a person should be understood as covering a danger arising from a serious criminal offence committed against that person such as grievous bodily injury, illicit trade in human organs and tissue, kidnapping, illegal restraint and hostage-taking, sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and rape.
Država članica, ki uporablja SVI, bi morala imeti možnost, da posreduje takšne informacije samo, če je zagotovljeno vzajemno posredovanje informacij o evidencah o vstopu/izstopu, ki jih ima država članica prosilka, državam članicam, ki uporabljajo SVI.
Such data should only be transferred to a third country if the reciprocal provision of any information on entry/exit records held by the requesting third country to the Member States operating the EES is ensured.
Za vsako naknadno obdelavo podatkov, pridobljenih iz SVI, se uporablja Direktiva (EU) 2016/680.
It should be possible for the competent authorities of the Member States whose designated authorities have access to the EES pursuant to this Regulation to transfer the EES data to Member States not operating the EES and to Member States to which this Regulation does not apply.
V vsaki državi članici bi nadzorni organ, ustanovljen v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/679, moral spremljati zakonitost obdelave osebnih podatkov s strani držav članic, Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov pa bi moral spremljati dejavnosti institucij in organov Unije v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
Such provision of information should be subject to a duly motivated request, and limited to where it is necessary for the prevention, detection or investigation of a terrorist offence or another serious criminal offence.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov in nadzorni organi bi morali medsebojno sodelovati pri spremljanju SVI.
It should be possible for a Member State that operates the EES to provide such information only if a reciprocal provision of any information on entry/exit records held by the requesting Member State to the Member States operating the EES is ensured.
V vsaki državi članici bi nadzorni organ, ustanovljen v skladu z Direktivo (EU) 2016/680, bi morali spremljati zakonitost obdelave osebnih podatkov s strani držav članic zaradi preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj.
Directive (EU) 2016/680 applies to all the subsequent treatment of data obtained from the EES.
Poleg določb o informacijah, ki jih je treba zagotoviti v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/679, bi bilo treba državljanom tretjih držav, katerih osebni podatki se bodo vnesli v SVI, zagotoviti ustrezne informacije v zvezi z vnosom teh podatkov.
In each Member State, the supervisory authority established in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should monitor the lawfulness of the processing of personal data by the Member States, whilst the European Data Protection Supervisor should monitor the activities of the Union institutions and bodies in relation to the processing of personal data.
Te informacije bi morale zagotoviti države članice v pisni obliki, na kakršen koli ustrezen način, vključno z letaki, plakati ali katerimi koli drugimi ustreznimi elektronskimi sredstvi.
The European Data Protection Supervisor and the supervisory authorities should cooperate with each other in the monitoring of the EES.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito spremljanje izvajanja te uredbe, bi bilo treba to uredbo ocenjevati v rednih časovnih presledkih.
In each Member State, the supervisory authority established in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/680 should monitor the lawfulness of the processing by the Member States of personal data for law enforcement purposes.
Države članice bi morale določiti pravila o kaznih, ki se uporabljajo za kršitve določb te uredbe, in zagotoviti njihovo izvajanje.
In addition to the provisions on information to be provided in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, third–country nationals whose data are to be recorded in the EES should be provided with appropriate information in relation to the recording of those data.
Za zagotovitev enotnih pogojev izvajanja te uredbe bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila.
This information should be provided by Member States in writing by any appropriate means, including leaflets, posters or any other appropriate electronic means.
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [16].
In order to ensure the effective monitoring of the application of this Regulation, this Regulation should be evaluated at regular intervals.
Ker ciljev te uredbe, in sicer vzpostavitve SVI ter določitve skupnih obveznosti, pogojev in postopkov za uporabo podatkov, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega in učinka predlaganega ukrepa lažje dosežejo na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
The Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and ensure that they are implemented.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Po začetku delovanja SVI bi bilo treba spremeniti Konvencijo o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah [17] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma), glede dvostranskih sporazumov, ki jih sklenejo države članice, in glede dovoljenega trajanja bivanja za državljane tretjih držav, izvzete iz vizumske obveznosti, ki presega 90 dni v katerem koli obdobju 180 dni.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [16].
Komisija bi morala v splošno oceno SVI vključiti oceno uporabe dvostranskih sporazumov držav članic.
Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the establishment of the EES and the creation of common obligations, conditions and procedures for use of data cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale and impact of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Moralo bi biti mogoče, da Komisija v prvo ocenjevalno poročilo vključi možnosti glede postopne ukinitve takih dvostranskih sporazumov in njihove nadomestitve z instrumentom Unije.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Predvideni stroški SVI so nižji kot proračun, ki je za pametne meje namenjen v okviru Uredbe (EU) št. 515/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [18].
Following the start of operations of the EES, the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders [17] (‘the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement’) should be amended with regard to bilateral agreements concluded by Member States and the authorised length of stay beyond 90 days in any 180-day period of visa-exempt third–country nationals.
V skladu s tem bi morala Komisija po sprejetju te uredbe z delegiranim aktom, določenim v Uredbi (EU) št. 515/2014, prerazporediti znesek, ki je trenutno namenjen razvoju informacijskih sistemov za podporo upravljanja migracijskih tokov na zunanjih mejah.
In its overall evaluation of the EES, the Commission should include an assessment of the use made of the bilateral agreements of Member States.
Ta uredba ne posega v Direktivo 2004/38/ES.
It should be possible for the Commission to include options in the first evaluation report in view of phasing out such bilateral agreements and replacing them with a Union instrument.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, ki je priložen PEU in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
The projected costs of the EES are lower than the budget earmarked for Smart Borders in Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [18].
Ker ta uredba nadgrajuje schengenski pravni red, se Danska v skladu s členom 4 navedenega protokola v šestih mesecih od dne, ko Svet sprejme to uredbo, odloči, ali jo bo prenesla v svoje nacionalno pravo.
Accordingly, following the adoption of this Regulation, the Commission should, by means of a delegated act provided for in Regulation (EU) No 515/2014, re-allocate the amount currently attributed for developing IT systems supporting the management of migration flows across the external borders.
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri katerih Združeno kraljestvo v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES ne sodeluje [19]; Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanj ni zavezujoča in se v njem ne uporablja.