natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The right to use an online content service should be regarded as acquired against payment of money, whether such payment is made directly to the provider of the online content service, or to another party such as a provider offering a package combining an electronic communications service and an online content service operated by another provider.
Pravico do uporabe storitve spletnih vsebin bi bilo treba šteti za pridobljeno proti plačilu v denarju, ne glede na to, ali se plačilo izvede neposredno ponudniku storitve spletnih vsebin ali drugi stranki, kot je ponudnik paketa elektronske komunikacijske storitve in storitve spletnih vsebin drugega ponudnika.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the payment of a mandatory fee for public broadcasting services should not be regarded as a payment of money for an online content service.
Za namene te uredbe se plačilo obvezne pristojbine za storitve javne radiodifuzije ne bi smelo šteti kot plačilo v denarju za storitev spletnih vsebin.
Providers of online content services should not subject their subscribers to any additional charges for the provision of cross-border portability of online content services in accordance with this Regulation.
Ponudniki storitev spletnih vsebin svojim naročnikom ne bi smeli zaračunavati dodatnih stroškov za zagotovitev čezmejne prenosljivosti storitev spletnih vsebin v skladu s to uredbo.
It is possible however that subscribers, in order to access and use online content services in Member States other than their Member State of residence, could be subject to fees payable to operators of electronic communications networks used to access such services.
Možno je, da bodo naročniki morali za dostop in uporabo storitev spletnih vsebin v državah članicah, ki niso njihove države članice prebivališča, plačati pristojbine upravljavcev elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, uporabljenih za dostop do teh storitev.
Providers of online content services which are provided without payment of money generally do not verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers.
Ponudniki storitev spletnih vsebin, ki se zagotavljajo brez plačila v denarju, običajno ne preverjajo države članice prebivališča svojih naročnikov.
The inclusion of such online content services in the scope of this Regulation would involve a major change to the way those services are delivered and involve disproportionate costs.
Vključitev takšnih storitev spletnih vsebin v področje uporabe te uredbe bi predstavljala veliko spremembo načina zagotavljanja teh storitev in bi prinesla nesorazmerne stroške.
However, the exclusion of those services from the scope of this Regulation would mean that providers of those services would not be able to take advantage of the legal mechanism which is provided for in this Regulation and which enables providers of online content services to offer cross-border portability of such services, even when they decide to invest in means that allow them to verify their subscribers’ Member State of residence.
Vendar pa bi izključitev teh storitev iz področja uporabe te uredbe pomenila, da ponudniki teh storitev ne bi mogli izkoristiti pravnega mehanizma, predvidenega v tej uredbi in ki ponudnikom storitev spletnih vsebin omogoča, da ponudijo čezmejno prenosljivost teh storitev, tudi če se odločijo za naložbo v načine, ki jim omogočajo preverjanje naročnikove države članice prebivališča.
Accordingly, providers of online content services which are provided without payment of money should be able to opt to be included in the scope of this Regulation provided that they comply with the requirements on the verification of the Member State of residence of their subscribers.
Ustrezno bi morali ponudniki storitev spletnih vsebin, ki se zagotavljajo brez plačila v denarju, imeti možnost, da so vključeni v področje uporabe te uredbe, pod pogojem, da izpolnjujejo zahteve o preverjanju naročnikove države članice prebivališča.
If such providers exercise that option, they should comply with the same obligations as imposed under this Regulation upon the providers of online content services which are provided against payment of money.
Če ti ponudniki uporabijo to možnost, bi morali izpolnjevati enake obveznosti, kot jih ta uredba določa za ponudnike storitev spletnih vsebin, ki se zagotavljajo proti plačilu v denarju.
Furthermore, they should inform the subscribers, the relevant holders of copyright and related rights and the relevant holders of any other rights in the content of the online content service of their decision to exercise that option in a timely manner.
Poleg tega bi morali o svoji odločitvi za uporabo te možnosti pravočasno obvestiti naročnike, zadevne imetnike avtorske pravice in sorodnih pravic ter zadevne imetnike vseh drugih pravic na vsebini storitve spletnih vsebin.
Such information could be provided on the provider’s website.
Te informacije bi se lahko zagotovile na spletišču ponudnika.
In order to ensure the cross-border portability of online content services, it is necessary to require providers of online content services covered by this Regulation to enable subscribers to use such services in the Member State in which they are temporarily present in the same manner as in their Member State of residence.
Za zagotovitev čezmejne prenosljivosti storitev spletnih vsebin je treba zahtevati, da ponudniki storitev spletnih vsebin, ki so zajete s to uredbo, naročnikom omogočijo uporabo teh storitev v državi članici, v kateri se začasno nahajajo, na enak način kot v njihovi državi članici prebivališča.
Subscribers should have access to online content services offering the same content on the same range and number of devices, for the same number of users and with the same range of functionalities as those offered in their Member State of residence.
Naročniki bi morali imeti dostop do storitev spletnih vsebin, ki ponujajo enako vsebino na isti vrsti in številu naprav, za enako število uporabnikov in z enakim obsegom funkcionalnosti, kot so jim na voljo v državi članici prebivališča.
It is essential that the obligation to provide cross-border portability of online content services be mandatory and therefore the parties should not be able to exclude it, derogate from it or vary its effect.
Bistveno je, da je obveznost zagotavljanja čezmejne prenosljivosti storitev spletnih vsebin zavezujoča, zato strankam ne bi smelo biti omogočeno, da jo izključijo, od nje odstopajo ali spreminjajo njene učinke.
Any action by a provider which would prevent subscribers from accessing or using the service while temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence, for example restrictions to the functionalities of the service or to the quality of its delivery should be considered to be a circumvention of the obligation to provide cross-border portability of online content services and therefore contrary to this Regulation.
Kakršno koli dejanje ponudnika, ki bi naročnikom preprečilo dostop do storitve ali njeno uporabo, medtem ko se začasno nahajajo v državi članici, ki ni njihova država članica prebivališča, na primer omejitve funkcionalnosti storitve ali kakovosti zagotavljanja storitve, bi se moralo šteti za izogibanje obveznosti zagotavljanja čezmejne prenosljivosti storitev spletnih vsebin in torej v nasprotju s to uredbo.
Requiring that the delivery of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence be of the same quality as in the Member State of residence could result in high costs for providers of online content services and thus ultimately for subscribers.
Če bi se zahtevalo, da se morajo storitve spletnih vsebin naročnikom, ki se začasno nahajajo v državi članici, ki ni njihova država članica prebivališča, zagotavljati v enaki kakovosti kot v državi članici prebivališča, bi lahko to privedlo do visokih stroškov za ponudnike storitev spletnih vsebin in s tem tudi za naročnike.
Therefore, it is not appropriate for this Regulation to require that providers ensure a quality of delivery of such services that would be beyond the quality available via the local online access chosen by a subscriber while temporarily present in another Member State.
Zato v tej uredbi ni primerno zahtevati, da ponudniki zagotavljajo take storitve v kakovosti, ki bi bila višja, kot je na voljo prek lokalnega spletnega dostopa, ki ga izbere naročnik med začasnim nahajanjem v drugi državi članici.
In such cases the provider should not be liable if the quality of delivery of the service is lower.
V takih primerih ponudnik ne bi smel biti odgovoren za morebitno slabšo kakovost zagotavljanja storitve.
Nevertheless, if the provider expressly guarantees a certain quality of delivery to subscribers while temporarily present in another Member State, it should be bound by that guarantee.
Če pa ponudnik izrecno jamči, da bo naročnikom, ko se ti začasno nahajajo v drugi državi članici, zagotavljal določeno raven kakovosti storitev, bi ga takšno jamstvo moralo zavezovati.
The provider, on the basis of the information in its possession, should provide its subscribers in advance with information concerning the quality of delivery of an online content service in Member States other than their Member State of residence, in particular the fact that the quality of delivery could differ from that applicable in their Member State of residence.
Ponudnik bi moral na podlagi informacij, ki jih ima, svojim naročnikom vnaprej zagotoviti informacije o kakovosti zagotavljanja storitev spletnih vsebin v državah članicah, ki niso naročnikova država članica prebivališča, zlasti informacije, da bi se kakovost zagotovljene storitve lahko razlikovala od kakovosti, zagotovljene v njihovi državi članici prebivališča.
The provider should not be under an obligation to actively seek information on the quality of delivery of a service in Member States other than the subscriber’s Member State of residence.
Ponudnik ne bi smel biti obvezan, da mora dejavno iskati informacije o kakovosti zagotavljanja storitve v državah članicah, ki niso naročnikova država članica prebivališča.
The relevant information could be provided on the provider’s website.
Ustrezne informacije bi se lahko zagotovile na spletišču ponudnika.
In order to ensure that providers of online content services covered by this Regulation comply with the obligation to provide cross-border portability of their services, without acquiring the relevant rights in another Member State, it is necessary to stipulate that those providers should always be entitled to provide such services to subscribers when they are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence.
Da lahko ponudniki storitev spletnih vsebin, ki so zajete s to uredbo, izpolnjujejo obveznost zagotavljanja čezmejne prenosljivosti svojih storitev, ne da bi pridobili ustrezne pravice v drugi državi članici, je treba določiti, da bi morali biti ti ponudniki vedno upravičeni do zagotavljanja takih storitev naročnikom, ki se začasno nahajajo v državi članici, ki ni njihova država članica prebivališča.
This should be achieved by establishing that the provision of, access to and use of such online content services should be deemed to occur in the subscriber’s Member State of residence.
To bi bilo treba doseči z določitvijo, da za zagotavljanje take storitve spletnih vsebin, dostop do nje in njeno uporabo velja, da potekajo v naročnikovi državi članici prebivališča.
This legal mechanism should apply for the sole purpose of ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services.
Ta pravni mehanizem bi se smel uporabljati samo za zagotavljanje čezmejne prenosljivosti storitev spletnih vsebin.
An online content service should be considered to be provided lawfully if both the service and the content are provided in a lawful manner in the Member State of residence.
Za storitev spletnih vsebin bi se moralo šteti, da se zagotavlja zakonito, če sta tako storitev kot vsebina zagotovljeni zakonito v državi članici prebivališča.
This Regulation, and in particular the legal mechanism by which the provision of, access to and use of an online content service are deemed to occur in the subscriber’s Member State of residence, does not prevent a provider from enabling the subscriber to additionally access and use the content lawfully offered by the provider in the Member State where the subscriber is temporarily present.
Ta uredba in zlasti pravni mehanizem, ki določa kraj zagotavljanja storitve spletnih vsebin ter dostopa do nje in njene uporabe v naročnikovi državi članici prebivališča, ponudniku ne preprečuje možnosti, da svojemu naročniku v državi članici, kjer se začasno nahaja, ponudi dodaten dostop in uporabo vsebin, ki jih ponudnik zakonito ponuja v tej državi članici.
For the licensing of copyright or related rights, the legal mechanism laid down in this Regulation means that relevant acts of reproduction, communication to the public and making available of works and other protected subject-matter, as well as the acts of extraction or re-utilization in relation to databases protected by sui generis rights, which occur when the service is provided to subscribers when they are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence, should be deemed to occur in the subscribers’ Member State of residence.
Za prenos avtorske pravice ali sorodnih pravic pravni mehanizem iz te uredbe pomeni, da bi za zadevna dejanja reproduciranja, priobčitve javnosti in dajanja na voljo del in drugih varovanih vsebin ter dejanja jemanja izvlečkov in ponovne uporabe v zvezi s podatkovnimi zbirkami, varovanimi s pravicami sui generis, do katerih pride, kadar se storitev zagotavlja naročnikom, ko se ti začasno nahajajo v državi članici, ki ni njihova država članica prebivališča, moralo veljati, da potekajo v naročnikovi državi članici prebivališča.
Providers of online content services covered by this Regulation, therefore, should be deemed to carry out such acts on the basis of the respective authorisations from the rightholders concerned for the Member State of residence of their subscribers.
Za ponudnike storitev spletnih vsebin, ki so zajete s to uredbo, bi zato moralo veljati, da taka dejanja izvedejo na podlagi ustreznih dovoljenj zadevnih imetnikov pravic za državo članico prebivališča njihovih naročnikov.
Whenever providers have the right to carry out acts of communication to the public or reproduction in their subscribers’ Member State of residence on the basis of an authorisation from the rightholders concerned, subscribers who are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence should be able to access and use the service and where necessary carry out any relevant acts of reproduction, such as downloading, which they would be entitled to do in their Member State of residence.
Kadar imajo ponudniki pravico, da izvedejo dejanja priobčitve javnosti ali reproduciranja v državi članici prebivališča na podlagi dovoljenja zadevnih imetnikov pravic, bi morali imeti naročniki, ki se začasno nahajajo v državi članici, ki ni njihova država članica prebivališča, možnost dostopa do storitve in njene uporabe ter po potrebi možnost izvedbe katerih koli ustreznih dejanj reproduciranja, kot je nalaganje s strežnika, do katerih bi bili upravičeni v njihovi državi članici prebivališča.
The provision of an online content service by providers to subscribers temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence and the access to and use of the service by such subscribers in accordance with this Regulation should not constitute a breach of copyright or related rights or any other rights relevant for the provision of, access to and use of the online content service.
Kadar ponudniki zagotavljajo storitev spletnih vsebin naročnikom, ki se začasno nahajajo v državi članici, ki ni njihova država članica prebivališča, in imajo naročniki dostop in uporabljajo storitev v skladu s to uredbo, to ne bi smelo pomeniti kršitve avtorske pravice ali sorodnih pravic ali katerih koli drugih pravic, ki so potrebne za zagotovitev, dostop in uporabo storitve spletne vsebine.
Providers of online content services covered by this Regulation should not be liable for the breach of any contractual provisions that are contrary to the obligation to enable their subscribers to use such services in the Member State in which they are temporarily present.
Ponudniki storitev spletnih vsebin, ki so zajete s to uredbo, ne bi smeli biti odgovorni za kršitev katere koli pogodbene določbe, ki je v nasprotju z obveznostjo, da svojim naročnikom omogočajo uporabo teh storitev v državi članici, kjer se začasno nahajajo.
Therefore, clauses in contracts designed to prohibit or limit the cross-border portability of such online content services should be unenforceable.
Zato bi morale biti klavzule v pogodbah, s katerimi se prepove ali omeji čezmejna prenosljivost tovrstnih storitev spletnih vsebin, neizvršljive.
The providers and holders of rights relevant for the provision of online content services should not be allowed to circumvent the application of this Regulation by choosing the law of a third country as the law applicable to contracts between them.
Ponudnikom in imetnikom pravic, povezanih z zagotavljanjem storitev spletnih vsebin, ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno, da se izognejo uporabi te uredbe z izbiro prava tretje države kot prava, ki bi veljalo za pogodbe med njimi.
The same should apply to contracts concluded between providers and subscribers.
To bi moralo veljati tudi za pogodbe, sklenjene med ponudniki in naročniki.
This Regulation should enable subscribers to enjoy online content services to which they have subscribed in their Member State of residence when they are temporarily present in another Member State.
Ta uredba bi morala naročnikom omogočiti uporabo storitev spletnih vsebin, na katere so naročeni v njihovi državi članici prebivališča, ko se začasno nahajajo v drugi državi članici.
Subscribers should be eligible for cross-border portability of online content services only if they reside in a Member State of the Union.
Naročniki bi morali biti upravičeni do čezmejne prenosljivosti storitev spletnih vsebin samo, če imajo prebivališče v državi članici Unije.
Therefore, this Regulation should oblige providers of online content services to make use of reasonable, proportionate and effective means in order to verify the Member State of residence of their subscribers.
Zato bi morala ta uredba ponudnike storitev spletnih vsebin obvezati, da z razumnimi, sorazmernimi in učinkovitimi sredstvi preverijo državo članico prebivališča svojih naročnikov.
To that end, providers should use the means of verification listed in this Regulation.
V ta namen bi morali ponudniki uporabljati sredstva za preverjanje, našteta v tej uredbi.
This does not preclude agreement between providers and rightholders on those means of verification within the limits of this Regulation.
To pa ne preprečuje dogovorov med ponudniki in imetniki pravic glede teh sredstev za preverjanje v mejah te uredbe.
The objective of the list is to provide legal certainty as to the means of verification to be used by providers as well as to limit interference with subscribers’ privacy.
Namen seznama je zagotoviti pravno varnost glede sredstev za preverjanje, ki jih uporabljajo ponudniki, ter omejiti motenje zasebnosti naročnikov.
In each case, account should be taken of the effectiveness and proportionality of a particular means of verification in a given Member State and for a given type of online content service.
V vsakem primeru bi bilo treba upoštevati učinkovitost in sorazmernost določenega sredstva za preverjanje v posamezni državi članici in za določeno vrsto storitve spletnih vsebin.
Unless the subscriber’s Member State of residence can be verified with sufficient certainty on the basis of a single means of verification, providers should rely on two means of verification.
Kolikor naročnikove države članice prebivališča ni mogoče z zadostno stopnjo gotovosti določiti s pomočjo enega samega sredstva za preverjanje, bi morali ponudniki storitev za preverjanje uporabiti dve sredstvi za preverjanje.
In cases where the provider has reasonable doubts concerning the subscriber’s Member State of residence, the provider should be able to repeat the verification of the subscriber’s Member State of residence.
Če ima ponudnik upravičene dvome glede naročnikove države članice prebivališča, bi moral imeti možnost, da ponovno preveri naročnikovo državo članico prebivališča.
The provider should implement the necessary technical and organisational measures required under applicable data protection rules for the processing of personal data collected for the purpose of verification of the subscriber’s Member State of residence under this Regulation.
Ponudnik bi moral izvajati tehnične in organizacijske ukrepe, ki so potrebni na podlagi veljavnih pravil o varstvu podatkov, za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, zbranih na podlagi te uredbe za preverjanje naročnikove države članice prebivališča.
Examples of such measures include providing transparent information to the individuals about the methods used for, and the purpose of, the verification, and appropriate security measures.
Primeri takšnih ukrepov so zagotavljanje preglednih informacij za posameznike o metodah preverjanja in njegovih namenih ter ustrezni varnostni ukrepi.
In order to verify the subscriber’s Member State of residence, the provider of an online content service should rely, if possible, on information which is in the provider’s possession, such as billing information.
Za preverjanje naročnikove države članice prebivališča bi moral ponudnik storitve spletnih vsebin, če je to mogoče, uporabiti informacije, ki jih že ima, kot so podatki za izstavitev računa.
As regards contracts concluded prior to the date of application of this Regulation and as regards the verification carried out upon renewal of a contract, the provider should be allowed to request the subscriber to provide the information necessary to verify the subscriber’s Member State of residence only when it cannot be determined on the basis of information which is already in the provider’s possession.
V zvezi s pogodbami, sklenjenimi pred datumom začetka uporabe te uredbe, ter preverjanja ob obnovitvi pogodbe, bi moral ponudnik imeti možnost, da od naročnika zahteva informacije, potrebne za preverjanje naročnikove države članice prebivališča samo, ko tega ni mogoče preveriti na podlagi informacij, ki jih ponudnik že ima.
IP address checks performed under this Regulation should be conducted in accordance with Directives 95/46/EC and 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Preglede naslovov IP v okviru te uredbe bi bilo treba opraviti v skladu z direktivama 95/46/ES in 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
In addition, for the purpose of verification of the subscriber’s Member State of residence what matters is not the precise location of the subscriber, but rather the Member State in which the subscriber is accessing the service.
Poleg tega za namene preverjanja naročnikove države članice prebivališča ni pomembna točna lokacija naročnika, temveč država članica, iz katere naročnik dostopa do storitve.
Accordingly, data on the subscriber’s precise location or any other personal data should neither be collected nor processed for that purpose.
Zaradi tega se podatki o natančni lokaciji naročnika ali kateri koli drugi osebni podatki ne bi smeli zbirati ali obdelovati v ta namen.
Where the provider has reasonable doubts concerning the subscriber’s Member State of residence and carries out an IP address check to verify the Member State of residence, the sole purpose of such checks should be to establish whether the subscriber is accessing or using the online content service within or outside the Member State of residence.
Kadar ima ponudnik upravičene dvome glede naročnikove države članice prebivališča in opravi pregled naslova IP, da bi preveril državo članico prebivališča, bi moral biti edini namen teh pregledov ugotoviti, ali naročnik dostopa ali uporablja storitev spletnih vsebin v državi članici prebivališča ali izven nje.