natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, the Executive Director should be responsible for preparing budgetary and planning documents submitted for the decision of the Management Board and for implementing the multiannual programming and annual work programmes of Europol and other planning documents.
Izvršni direktor bi moral biti odgovoren zlasti za pripravo proračunskih dokumentov in dokumentov, ki zadevajo načrtovanje, ki se predložijo v odločanje upravnemu odboru, in za izvajanje večletnega načrtovanja in letnih delovnih programov Europola ter drugih dokumentov, ki zadevajo načrtovanje.
For the purposes of preventing and combating crime falling within the scope of its objectives, it is necessary for Europol to have the fullest and most up-to-date information possible.
Europol mora nujno imeti na voljo popolne in najnovejše informacije za namene preprečevanja kaznivih dejanj, ki spadajo med njegove cilje, in boj proti njim.
Therefore, Europol should be able to process data provided to it by Member States, Union bodies, third countries, international organisations and, under stringent conditions laid down by this Regulation, private parties, as well as data coming from publicly available sources, in order to develop an understanding of criminal phenomena and trends, to gather information about criminal networks, and to detect links between different criminal offences.
Zato bi mu bilo treba omogočiti obdelavo podatkov, ki mu jih posredujejo države članice, organi Unije, tretje države in mednarodne organizacije, pod strogimi pogoji, ki jih določa ta uredba, pa tudi zasebne stranke, ter podatkov iz javno dostopnih virov, da se omogoči boljše razumevanje kriminalnih pojavov in trendov, zbiranje informacij o kriminalnih združbah ter odkrivanje povezav med posameznimi kaznivimi dejanji.
To improve Europol's effectiveness in providing accurate crime analyses to the competent authorities of the Member States, it should use new technologies to process data.
Europol bi moral za obdelavo podatkov uporabljati nove tehnologije, da se izboljša njegova učinkovitost pri zagotavljanju natančnih analiz kaznivih dejanj pristojnim organom v državah članicah.
Europol should be able to swiftly detect links between investigations and common modi operandi across different criminal groups, to check cross-matches of data and to have a clear overview of trends, while guaranteeing a high level of protection of personal data for individuals.
Europolu bi bilo treba omogočiti hitro ugotavljanje povezav med preiskavami in običajnimi načini delovanja različnih kriminalnih združb, preverjanje navzkrižnih zadetkov podatkov in jasen pregled trendov, pri čemer bi bilo treba zagotoviti visoko raven varstva osebnih podatkov posameznikov.
Therefore, Europol databases should be structured in such a way as to allow Europol to choose the most efficient IT structure.
Zato bi morale biti Europolove zbirke podatkov strukturirane tako, da bo Europol lahko izbral najučinkovitejšo strukturo informacijske tehnologije.
Europol should also be able to act as a service provider, in particular by providing a secure network for the exchange of data, such as the secure information exchange network application (SIENA), aimed at facilitating the exchange of information between Member States, Europol, other Union bodies, third countries and international organisations.
Europol bi prav tako moral imeti možnost, da nastopa kot ponudnik storitev, zlasti tako, da ponudi varno mrežo za izmenjavo podatkov, kakršna je mrežna aplikacija za varno izmenjavo informacij (SIENA), z namenom, da se olajša izmenjava informacij med državami članicami, Europolom, drugimi organi Unije, tretjimi državami in mednarodnimi organizacijami.
In order to ensure a high level of data protection, the purpose of processing operations and access rights as well as specific additional safeguards should be laid down.
Da bi zagotovili visoko raven varstva podatkov, bi bilo treba določiti namen operacij obdelave in pravice v zvezi z dostopom ter posebne dodatne zaščitne ukrepe.
In particular, the principles of necessity and proportionality should be observed with regard to the processing of personal data.
Pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov bi bilo treba zlasti upoštevati načelo nujnosti in načelo sorazmernosti.
Europol should ensure that all personal data processed for operational analyses are allocated a specific purpose.
Europol bi moral zagotoviti, da se vsem osebnim podatkom, ki se obdelujejo za operativne analize, dodeli določen namen.
Nonetheless, in order for Europol to fulfil its mission, it should be allowed to process all personal data received to identify links between multiple crime areas and investigations, and should not be limited to identifying connections only within one crime area.
Vseeno pa bi bilo treba Europolu za izpolnjevanje njegovih nalog dovoliti obdelavo vseh osebnih podatkov, ki jih prejme za prepoznavanje povezav med različnimi področji kriminalitete in preiskavami, to pa ne bi smelo biti omejeno na prepoznavanje povezav zgolj znotraj posameznega področja kriminalitete.
To respect the ownership of data and the protection of personal data, Member States, Union bodies, third countries and international organisations should be able to determine the purpose or purposes for which Europol may process the data they provide and to restrict access rights.
Da se zagotovi spoštovanje lastništva podatkov in varstvo osebnih podatkov, bi države članice, organi Unije, tretje države in mednarodne organizacije morali imeti možnost določiti namen oziroma namene, za katere bi Europol smel obdelovati podatke, ki jih posredujejo, in omejiti pravice v zvezi z dostopom.
Purpose limitation is a fundamental principle of personal data processing; in particular, it contributes to transparency, legal certainty and predictability and is particularly of high importance in the area of law enforcement cooperation, where data subjects are usually unaware when their personal data are being collected and processed and where the use of personal data may have a very significant impact on the lives and freedoms of individuals.
Omejitev namena je temeljno načelo obdelave osebnih podatkov, ki zlasti prispeva k preglednosti, pravni varnosti in predvidljivosti ter je velikega pomena zlasti pri sodelovanju na področju preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj, kjer se posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, običajno ne zavedajo, kdaj se njihovi osebni podatki zbirajo in obdelujejo, in kjer ima uporaba osebnih podatkov lahko zelo velik vpliv na življenje in svoboščine posameznikov.
To ensure that data are accessed only by those needing access in order to perform their tasks, this Regulation should lay down detailed rules on different degrees of right of access to data processed by Europol.
Da se zagotovi, da bodo do podatkov dostopali le tisti, ki dostop nujno potrebujejo za izvajanje svojih nalog, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti podrobna pravila o različnih obsegih pravice dostopa do podatkov, ki jih obdeluje Europol.
Such rules should be without prejudice to restrictions on access imposed by data providers, as the principle of ownership of data should be respected.
Ta pravila ne bi smela posegati v omejitve glede dostopa, ki jih določijo pošiljatelji podatkov, saj bi bilo treba spoštovati načelo lastništva podatkov.
In order to increase efficiency in the prevention and combating of crimes falling within the scope of Europol's objectives, Europol should notify Member States of information which concerns them.
Da se zagotovi večja učinkovitost pri preprečevanju kaznivih dejanj, ki spadajo med cilje Europola, in boju proti njim, bi moral Europol države članice obvestiti o informacijah, ki jih zadevajo.
To enhance operational cooperation between the agencies, and particularly to establish links between data already in the possession of the different agencies, Europol should enable Eurojust and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) to have access, on the basis of a hit/no hit system, to data available at Europol.
Da se izboljša operativno sodelovanje med agencijami in da se zlasti vzpostavijo povezave med podatki, ki jih že imajo različne agencije, bi Europol moral Eurojustu in Evropskemu uradu za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) omogočiti dostop do svojih podatkov na podlagi sistema javljanja zadetkov.
Europol and Eurojust should be able to conclude a working arrangement ensuring, in a reciprocal manner within their respective mandates, access to, and the possibility of searching, all information that has been provided for the purpose of cross-checking in accordance with specific safeguards and data protection guarantees provided for in this Regulation.
Europolu in Eurojustu bi bilo treba omogočiti, da skleneta delovni dogovor, ki bi jima v okviru njunih pristojnosti zagotavljal vzajemen dostop do vseh informacij, ki so bile posredovane za namen navzkrižnega preverjanja, in možnost vzajemnega iskanja po teh informacijah, in sicer v skladu s posebnimi zaščitnimi ukrepi in jamstvi za varstvo podatkov iz te uredbe.
Any access to data available at Europol should, by technical means, be limited to information falling within the respective mandates of those Union bodies.
Vsakršen dostop do podatkov, ki so na voljo pri Europolu, bi bilo treba tehnično omejiti na informacije, povezane s pristojnostmi zadevnih organov Unije.
Europol should maintain cooperative relations with other Union bodies, authorities of third countries, international organisations and private parties, to the extent required for the accomplishment of its tasks.
Europol bi moral vzdrževati kooperativne odnose z drugimi organi Unije, organi tretjih držav, mednarodnimi organizacijami in zasebnimi strankami, in sicer v obsegu, ki je potreben za izpolnjevanje njegovih nalog.
To ensure operational effectiveness, Europol should be able to exchange all relevant information, with the exception of personal data, with other Union bodies, authorities of third countries and international organisations, to the extent necessary for the performance of its tasks.
Da se zagotovi operativna učinkovitost, bi bilo treba Europolu omogočiti izmenjavo vseh zadevnih informacij, razen osebnih podatkov, z drugimi organi Unije, organi tretjih držav in mednarodnimi organizacijami, in sicer v obsegu, ki je potreben za izvajanje njegovih nalog.
Since companies, firms, business associations, non-governmental organisations and other private parties hold expertise and information of direct relevance to the prevention and combating of serious crime and terrorism, Europol should also be able to exchange such information with private parties.
Ker imajo družbe, podjetja, poslovna združenja, nevladne organizacije in druge zasebne stranke strokovno znanje in informacije, ki so neposredno pomembne za preprečevanje hudih kaznivih dejanj in terorizma ter boj proti njim, bi bilo Europolu treba omogočiti tudi izmenjavo takih informacij z zasebnimi strankami.
To prevent and combat cybercrime, as related to network and information security incidents, Europol should, pursuant to the applicable legislative act of the Union laying down measures to ensure a high common level of network and information security across the Union, cooperate and exchange information, with the exception of personal data, with national authorities competent for the security of network and information systems.
Za preprečevanje kibernetske kriminalitete, povezane z ogrožanjem varnosti omrežja in informacij, in boj proti njej, bi moral Europol v skladu z veljavnim zakonodajnim aktom Unije, ki določa ukrepe za zagotovitev visoke ravni omrežne in informacijske varnosti po vsej Uniji, sodelovati in izmenjavati informacije, razen osebnih podatkov, z nacionalnimi organi, pristojnimi za varnost omrežja in informacijskih sistemov.
Europol should be able to exchange relevant personal data with other Union bodies to the extent necessary for the accomplishment of its or their tasks.
Europolu bi bilo treba omogočiti izmenjavo zadevnih osebnih podatkov z drugimi organi Unije v obsegu, ki je potreben za izpolnjevanje njegovih oziroma njihovih nalog.
Serious crime and terrorism often have links beyond the territory of the Union.
Huda kazniva dejanja in terorizem so pogosto povezani z osebami zunaj ozemlja Unije.
Europol should therefore be able to exchange personal data with authorities of third countries and with international organisations such as the International Criminal Police Organisation — Interpol to the extent necessary for the accomplishment of its tasks.
Zato bi bilo Europolu treba omogočiti izmenjavo osebnih podatkov z organi tretjih držav in mednarodnimi organizacijami, kot je Mednarodna organizacija kriminalistične policije – Interpol, in sicer v obsegu, ki je potreben za izpolnjevanje njegovih nalog.
All Member States are affiliated to Interpol.
Vse države članice so pridružene Interpolu.
To fulfil its mission, Interpol receives, stores and circulates data to assist competent law enforcement authorities to prevent and combat international crime.
Za izpolnjevanje svojih nalog Interpol prejema, shranjuje in razpošilja podatke, da bi pristojnim organom preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj tako pomagal pri preprečevanju mednarodne kriminalitete in boju proti njej.
Therefore, it is appropriate to strengthen cooperation between Europol and Interpol by promoting an efficient exchange of personal data whilst ensuring respect for fundamental rights and freedoms regarding the automatic processing of personal data.
Zato bi bilo treba izboljšati sodelovanje med Europolom in Interpolom, in sicer s spodbujanjem učinkovite izmenjave osebnih podatkov ob hkratnem zagotavljanju spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in svoboščin v zvezi z avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
When personal data is transferred from Europol to Interpol, this Regulation, in particular the provisions on international transfers, should apply.
Za prenos podatkov, ki jih Europol posreduje Interpolu, bi se morala uporabljati ta uredba, zlasti določbe o mednarodnih prenosih.
To guarantee purpose limitation, it is important to ensure that personal data can be transferred by Europol to Union bodies, third countries and international organisations only if necessary for preventing and combating crime that falls within Europol's objectives.
Za zagotovitev omejitve namena je pomembno zagotoviti, da lahko Europol prenese osebne podatke organom Unije, tretjim državam in mednarodnim organizacijam le, če je nujno za preprečevanje kaznivih dejanj, ki spadajo med cilje Europola, in boj proti njim.
To this end, it is necessary to ensure that, when personal data are transferred, the recipient gives an undertaking that the data will be used by the recipient or transferred onward to a competent authority of a third country solely for the purpose for which they were originally transferred.
V ta namen je treba pri prenosu osebnih podatkov zagotoviti, da se prejemnik zaveže, da bo podatke uporabil ali jih prenesel pristojnemu organu tretje države samo za namen, za katerega so bili prvotno preneseni.
Further onward transfer of the data should take place in compliance with this Regulation.
Nadaljnji prenos podatkov bi moral potekati v skladu s to uredbo.
Europol should be able to transfer personal data to an authority of a third country or an international organisation on the basis of a Commission decision finding that the country or international organisation in question ensures an adequate level of data protection (‘adequacy decision’), or, in the absence of an adequacy decision, an international agreement concluded by the Union pursuant to Article 218 TFEU, or a cooperation agreement allowing for the exchange of personal data concluded between Europol and the third country prior to the entry into force of this Regulation.
Europolu bi bilo treba omogočiti prenos osebnih podatkov organu tretje države ali mednarodni organizaciji na podlagi sklepa Komisije, da zadevna država ali mednarodna organizacija zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva podatkov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o ustreznosti), ali, če ni sklepa o ustreznosti, na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, ki ga je sklenila Unija v skladu s členom 218 PDEU, ali sporazuma o sodelovanju, ki omogoča izmenjavo osebnih podatkov, sklenjenega med Europolom in zadevno tretjo državo pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe.
In light of Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, the legal effects of such agreements are to be preserved until those agreements are repealed, annulled or amended in the implementation of the Treaties.
V skladu s členom 9 Protokola št. 36 o prehodnih določbah, priloženega PEU in PDEU, morajo taki sporazumi obdržati svoj pravni učinek, dokler niso razveljavljeni, razglašeni za nične ali spremenjeni zaradi izvajanja Pogodb.
Where appropriate and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11], the Commission should be able to consult the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) before and during the negotiation of an international agreement.
Komisija bi morala imeti možnost, da se po potrebi in v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11] pred in med pogajanji o mednarodnem sporazumu posvetuje z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov.
Where the Management Board identifies an operational need for cooperation with a third country or an international organisation, it should be able to suggest to the Council that the latter draw the attention of the Commission to the need for an adequacy decision or for a recommendation for the opening of negotiations on an international agreement as referred to above.
Če upravni odbor opredeli operativno potrebo za sodelovanje s tretjo državo ali mednarodno organizacijo, bi moral imeti možnost predlagati Svetu, naj Komisijo opozori na potrebo po sklepu o ustreznosti ali priporočilu za začetek pogajanj o navedenem mednarodnem sporazumu.
Where a transfer of personal data cannot be based on an adequacy decision, an international agreement concluded by the Union or an existing cooperation agreement, the Management Board, in agreement with the EDPS, should be allowed to authorise a set of transfers, where specific conditions so require and provided that adequate safeguards are ensured.
Kadar prenos osebnih podatkov ne more temeljiti na sklepu o ustreznosti ali mednarodnem sporazumu, ki ga je sklenila Unija, ali obstoječem sporazumu o sodelovanju, bi moral upravni odbor v soglasju z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov imeti možnost, da odobri niz prenosov, kadar tako nalagajo posebni pogoji in če so zagotovljeni ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi.
The Executive Director should be allowed to authorise the transfer of data in exceptional cases on a case-by-case basis, where such transfer is required, under specific strict conditions.
Izvršni direktor bi moral imeti pooblastilo, da izjemoma in za vsak primer posebej odobri prenos podatkov, če je tak prenos potreben, in sicer pod posebnimi strogimi pogoji.
Europol should be able to process personal data originating from private parties and private persons only if those data are transferred to Europol by one of the following: a national unit in accordance with its national law; a contact point in a third country or an international organisation with which there is established cooperation through a cooperation agreement allowing for the exchange of personal data concluded in accordance with Article 23 of Decision 2009/371/JHA prior to the entry into force of this Regulation; an authority of a third country or an international organisation which is subject to an adequacy decision or with which the Union has concluded an international agreement pursuant to Article 218 TFEU.
Europol bi moral imeti možnost, da obdeluje osebne podatke, ki izvirajo od zasebnih strank in posameznikov, le tedaj, ko mu te podatke posreduje eden od sledečih: nacionalna enota v skladu z njenim nacionalnim pravom; kontaktna točka v tretji državi ali v mednarodni organizaciji, s katero je vzpostavljeno sodelovanje s sporazumom o sodelovanju, ki omogoča izmenjavo osebnih podatkov, sklenjenim v skladu s členom 23 Sklepa 2009/371/PNZ pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe; organ tretje države ali mednarodna organizacija, za katero je potreben sklep o ustreznosti ali s katero je Unija sklenila mednarodni sporazum v skladu s členom 218 PDEU.
However, in cases where Europol receives personal data directly from private parties and the national unit, contact point or authority concerned cannot be identified, Europol should be able to process those personal data solely for the purpose of identifying those entities, and such data should be deleted unless those entities resubmit those personal data within four months after the transfer takes place.
Vendar v primerih, ko Europol prejme osebne podatke neposredno od zasebnih strank, nacionalne enote, kontaktne točke ali zadevnega organa pa ni mogoče določiti, bi moral imeti Europol možnost, da te osebne podatke obdela le za namen identifikacije teh subjektov, take podatke pa bi bilo treba izbrisati, razen če ti organi zadevne osebne podatke ponovno predložijo v štirih mesecih po prenosu.
Europol should ensure by technical means that, during that period, such data would not be accessible for processing for any other purpose.
Europol bi moral s tehničnimi sredstvi zagotoviti, da taki podatki v zadevnem obdobju ne bi bili dostopni za obdelavo za noben drug namen.
Taking into account the exceptional and specific threat posed to the internal security of the Union by terrorism and other forms of serious crime, especially when facilitated, promoted or committed using the internet, the activities that Europol should undertake on the basis of this Regulation, stemming from its implementation of the Council Conclusions of 12 March 2015 and the call by the European Council of 23 April 2015 in relation especially to those priority areas, in particular the corresponding practice of direct exchanges of personal data with private parties, should be evaluated by the Commission by 1 May 2019.
Ob upoštevanju izjemne in posebne nevarnosti, ki jo za notranjo varnost Unije predstavljajo terorizem in druge oblike hudih kaznivih dejanj, zlasti kadar jih omogoča uporaba interneta oziroma se spodbujajo ali storijo z uporabo spleta, bi morala Komisija do 1. maja 2019 oceniti dejavnosti, ki bi jih moral Europol izvajati na podlagi te uredbe in ki izhajajo iz izvajanja sklepov Sveta z dne 12. marca 2015 in poziva Evropskega sveta z dne 23. aprila 2015 zlasti v zvezi z navedenimi prednostnimi področji, predvsem ustrezno prakso neposrednih izmenjav osebnih podatkov z zasebnimi strankami.
Any information which has clearly been obtained in obvious violation of human rights should not be processed.
Informacije, za katere je jasno, da so bile pridobljene z očitno kršitvijo človekovih pravic, se ne bi smele obdelovati.
Data protection rules at Europol should be strengthened and should draw on the principles underpinning Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 to ensure a high level of protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data.
Pravila o varstvu podatkov v Europolu bi bilo treba okrepiti, navezovati pa bi se morala na načela, na katerih temelji Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001, da se zagotovi visoka raven varstva posameznikov v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
As Declaration No 21 on the protection of personal data in the fields of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation, attached to the TEU and the TFEU, recognises the specificity of personal data processing in the law enforcement context, the data protection rules of Europol should be autonomous while at the same time consistent with other relevant data protection instruments applicable in the area of police cooperation in the Union.
Ker izjava št. 21 o varstvu osebnih podatkov na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah in policijskega sodelovanja, priložena PEU in PDEU, priznava specifičnost obdelave osebnih podatkov v okviru preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj, bi morala biti pravila Europola o varstvu podatkov samostojna in hkrati skladna z drugimi ustreznimi instrumenti varstva podatkov, ki se uporabljajo na področju policijskega sodelovanja v Uniji.