natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On this basis, the Commission concluded that 8 % was a profit margin that the Union industry could reasonably expect to realise under normal conditions of competition, namely in the absence of dumped imports, and this profit margin should therefore be used for the calculation of the injury elimination level.
C. RAZKRITJE
C. DISCLOSURE
Komisija je prejela pripombe v predpisanih rokih in jih je ustrezno upoštevala.
The Commission disclosed the facts and considerations referred to above on 29 June 2016.
Poleg tega je 11. avgusta 2016 potekala obravnava med službami Komisije in podjetjem Yuanping.
Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Po razkritju je podjetje Oxaquima trdilo, da ni bilo jasno, ali je trditev podjetja Yuanping iz uvodnje izjave 4 v celoti ali le delno utemeljena.
Ltd and the Union industry were given an opportunity to comment on them.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija potrdila, da je bila trditev v celoti utemeljena.
Comments were received within the prescribed deadlines and were duly taken into consideration.
Dejansko, kot je podrobno razloženo v uvodnih izjavah 5 in 6, popravljeni izračun, ki ga je opravila Komisija med prvotno preiskavo, v celoti odraža pripombe podjetja Yuanping v času prvotne preiskave.
In addition, on 11 August 2016 a hearing was held between the Commission services and Yuanping.
Podjetje Yuanping je trdilo, da je Komisija z izvajanjem sodbe Sodišča opravila post hoc analizo, da bi upravičila ugotovitve prvotne preiskave.
As a result of the comments received from interested parties, some changes were made with respect to the original disclosure document of 29 June 2016.
Podjetje Yuanping meni, da to dokazuje dejstvo, da se je Komisija zanašala na Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1138/2011 [10], ki je bila objavljena po oceni ciljnega dobička v sedanjem postopku.
Therefore, the Commission disclosed again the above facts and considerations to interested parties on 24 August 2016.
Podjetje Yuanping je trdilo, da takšne post hoc analize ni mogoče uporabiti za utemeljitev prvotnih ugotovitev.
Following disclosure, Oxaquim claimed that it was unclear whether Yuanping's claim referred to in recital 4 above had been fully or only partially warranted.
Ta trditev ni bila pravilna in je bila zavrnjena iz naslednjih razlogov.
In this respect, the Commission confirmed that the claim had been warranted in full.
Prvič, v zvezi z zadevami, ki se zanašajo na oceno ciljnega dobička (v uredbi so omenjene le nekatere), se trditev podjetja Yuanping ne sklada z dejstvi.
In fact, as explained in detail in recitals 5 and 6 above, the revised calculation performed by the Commission in the original investigation fully reflected the comments made by Yuanping at the time of the original investigation.
Ciljni dobiček v vseh teh zadevah, vključno z uredbo, ki jo zgoraj omenja podjetje Yuanping, je bil določen začasno ali dokončno pred določitvijo ciljnega dobička v prvotni preiskavi.
For its part, Yuanping alleged that in implementing the Court judgment, the Commission conducted a post hoc analysis in order to justify the findings of the original investigation.
Drugič, za izvršitev sodbe Sodišča v skladu s členom 266 PDEU mora Komisija predložiti obrazložitev v skladu s členom 296 PDEU za tiste ugotovitve iz prvotne preiskave, za katere je Sodišče menilo, da je obrazložitev nezadostna.
According to Yuanping this was evidenced by the fact that the Commission relied on Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 [10], which was published after the assessment of the target profit in the current proceeding.
Pri tem se mora Komisija zanašati zgolj na informacije, ki so bile na voljo v času prvotne preiskave.
Yuanping claimed that such a post hoc analysis could not be used to justify the original findings.
V skladu s tem je Komisija utemeljila te ugotovitve, npr. uporabo 8-odstotnega ciljnega dobička, zgolj z uporabo informacij, na katere se je prej zanašala med prvotno preiskavo.
This claim was not correct and it was rejected for the following reasons.
Poleg tega so bile vse informacije, ki jih je Komisija predstavila v tej uredbi, že zajete v dokumentaciji prvotne preiskave in/ali so bile takrat na voljo javnosti.
Firstly, with regard to the cases relied on for the assessment of the target profit (out of which only a few of them have been referenced in the regulation), Yuanping claim is factually incorrect.
Takšne informacije so bile med to preiskavo ponovno predložene podjetju Yuanping, kar kaže, da Komisija v svoji izboljšani obrazložitvi ni uporabila nobenega novega dokaza.
The target profit in all these cases, including the regulation referred to above by Yuanping, had been either provisionally or definitively established prior to the determination of the target profit in the original investigation.
Podjetje Yuanping je nadalje trdilo, da upravni postopek ni dovolj za odpravo napak, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče.
Secondly, in order to implement the judgment of the Court in accordance with Article 266 TFEU, the Commission must provide with a statement of reasons in accordance with Article 296 TFEU, for those findings made in the original investigation and for which the Court found that the statement of reasons was insufficient.
Ta trditev je bila zavrnjena.
In doing so, the Commission has to rely on the information that was available at the time of the original investigation.
Sodišče ni ugotovilo, da bi bile ugotovitve Komisije napačne, tako glede dejstev kot vsebine.
Accordingly, the Commission motivated those findings, e.g. the use of 8 % as target profit, using only information that it had previously relied upon during the original investigation.
Vendar pa je ugotovilo, da izpodbijana uredba ponekod ni dovolj obrazložena.
In addition, all the information presented by the Commission in this regulation was already in the case file of the original investigation and/or was publicly available at that time.
Predložitev podrobnejše obrazložitve v tej uredbi v skladu s členom 296 PDEU je ustrezen način za izvršitev sodbe Sodišča.
Such information was provided to Yuanping in the context of this investigation again, showing that the Commission did not use any new evidence in its improved statement of reasons.
Nazadnje je podjetje Yuanping trdilo, da je številka, ki jo je Komisija uporabila za stroške po uvozu, tj. 10 EUR/tono, prenizka.
Yuanping further argued that an administrative procedure is not sufficient in order to correct the errors found by the Court.
V podporo tej trditvi je podjetje Yuanping Komisiji predložilo dokaze v obliki več računov iz leta 2016, na katerih so bili stroški po uvozu domnevno višji.
The Court did not establish that the findings of the Commission were factually or substantially wrong.
Številke za stroške po uvozu, ki jih je uporabljala Komisija v prvotni preiskavi, so bile rezultat preverjenih informacij sodelujočih nepovezanih uvoznikov.
Rather, the Court established that in some instances, the contested regulation lacked sufficient reasoning.
V zvezi s tem podjetje Yuanping ni utemeljilo, zakaj bi morala Komisija preračunati številke z uporabo nepreverjenih podatkov iz obdobja izven obdobja prvotne preiskave.
Providing an enhanced statement of reasons in this regulation, in accordance with Article 296 TFEU, is the appropriate means to comply with the Court judgment.
Ta uredba je v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 –
Lastly, Yuanping claimed that the figure used by the Commission for post-importation costs, i.e. 10 EUR/tonne, was too low.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
To support this claim, Yuanping provided the Commission with evidence in the form of several invoices from 2016, where the post-importation costs were allegedly higher.
Člen 1
This claim was rejected.
Za uvoz oksalne kisline v dihidratni (številka CUS 0028635-1 in številka CAS 6153-56-6) ali anhidridni obliki (številka CUS 0021238-4 in številka CAS 144-62-7) ter v vodni raztopini ali ne s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex29171100 (oznaka TARIC 2917110091) in jo proizvaja podjetje Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
The figures for post-importation costs used by the Commission in the original investigation were the result of verified information from cooperating unrelated importers.
Ltd (dodatna oznaka TARIC B232), se določi dokončna protidampinška dajatev v višini 14,6 %.
In this respect, Yuanping failed to substantiate why the Commission should recalculate this figure using unverified data from a period outside the original investigation period.
Člen 2
This Regulation is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009,
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Article 1
V Bruslju, 28. novembra 2016
A definitive anti-dumping duty of 14,6 % is hereby imposed on imports of oxalic acid, whether in dihydrate (CUS number 0028635-1 and CAS number 6153-56-6) or anhydrous form (CUS number 0021238-4 and CAS number 144-62-7) and whether or not in aqueous solution, originating in the People's Republic of China, currently falling within CN code ex29171100 (TARIC code 2917110091) and produced by Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Za Komisijo
Ltd (TARIC additional code B232)
Predsednik
Article 2
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 325/2012 z dne 12. aprila 2012 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Indije in Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 106, 18.4.2012, str. 1).
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti (UL L 343, 22.12.2009. str.
Done at Brussels, 28 November 2016.
51).
For the Commission
Od 20. julija 2016: Uredba (EU) 2016/1036.
The President
Zadeva T-310/12 Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
Ltd proti Svetu Evropske unije.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 325/2012 of 12 April 2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of oxalic acid originating in India and the People's Republic of China (OJ L 106, 18.4.2012, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1043/2011 z dne 19. oktobra 2011 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Indije in Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 275, 20.10.2011, str. 1).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p.
Epicheiriseon Metalleftikon Viomichanikon kai Naftiliaekon AE in drugi proti Svetu, zadeva C-121/86, [1989] Recueil 3919.
51).
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 1472/91 z dne 29. maja 1991 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Indije ali Kitajske in ustavitvi protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Češkoslovaške (UL L 138, 1.6.1991, str. 62) (uvodna izjava 45); potrjeno z dokončno uredbo: Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 3434/91 z dne 25. novembra 1991 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Indije in Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 326, 28.11.1991, str. 6) (uvodna izjava 26).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2088
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/2088
Done at Brussels, 29 November 2016.
V Bruslju, 29. novembra 2016
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2089
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/2089
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 [1], and in particular Article 188 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov kmetijskih proizvodov in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 922/72, (EGS) št. 234/79, (ES) št. 1037/2001 in (ES) št. 1234/2007 [1] in zlasti člena 188 Uredbe,
Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009 provides for the possibility for operators to lodge export licence applications from 1 to 10 November if, after the period of submission of licence applications as referred to in the first paragraph of that Article, any quantity under the quota remains available.
Člen 29 Uredbe (ES) št. 1187/2009 določa možnost za nosilce dejavnosti, da vložijo zahtevke za dovoljenja od 1. do 10. novembra, če so po obdobju za vložitev zahtevkov za dovoljenja, kot je navedeno v prvem odstavku navedenega člena, količine na podlagi kvote še vedno na voljo.
Article 1 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1027 [3] specifies that the total remaining quantity for the quota year 2016/2017 is 8095 tonnes.
Člen 1 Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2016/1027 [3] določa, da je celotna preostala količina za kvotno leto 2016/2017 8095 ton.
The applications lodged between 1 and 10 November 2016 for the remaining period of the running quota year 2016/2017 cover quantities less than those available.
Zahtevki, vloženi med 1. in 10. novembrom 2016 za preostalo obdobje za tekoče kvotno leto 2016/2017, zajemajo količine, ki so manjše od razpoložljivih količin.
The applications for export licences lodged from 1 to 10 November 2016 for the remaining period of the running quota year 2016/2017 shall be accepted.
Zahtevki za izvozna dovoljenja, vloženi med 1. in 10. novembrom 2016 za preostalo obdobje za tekoče kvotno leto 2016/2017, se odobrijo.
The quantities covered by export licence applications referred to in the first paragraph for the products referred to in Article 27(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 3,113461.
Količine v zahtevkih za izvozna dovoljenja iz prve alinee za proizvode iz člena 27(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1187/2009 se pomnožijo s koeficientom dodeljevanja v višini 3,113461.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1027 of 24 June 2016 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for export licences for certain milk products to be exported to the Dominican Republic under the quota referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009 (OJ L 168, 25.6.2016, p.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1027 z dne 24. junija 2016 o določitvi koeficienta dodeljevanja, ki se bo uporabil za zahtevke za izvozna dovoljenja za izvoz nekaterih mlečnih izdelkov v Dominikansko republiko v okviru kvote iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1187/2009 (UL L 168, 25.6.2016, str. 11).
Regulation (EU) 2016/2094 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2016/2094 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 establishing a long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1342/2008 o določitvi dolgoročnega načrta za staleže trske in ribištvo, ki izkorišča te staleže
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 43(2) Pogodbe,
Council Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 [3] establishes a long-term plan for cod stocks in the Kattegat, the North Sea, the Skagerrak and the eastern Channel, the west of Scotland and the Irish Sea, and for the fisheries exploiting those stocks.
V Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1342/2008 [3] je določen dolgoročni načrt za staleže trske v Kattegatu, Severnem morju, Skagerraku in vzhodnem Rokavskem prelivu, na zahodu Škotske in v Irskem morju, ter za ribištvo, ki izkorišča te staleže.
The objective of Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 is sustainable exploitation that restores and maintains those cod stocks above levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield (MSY).
Cilj Uredbe (ES) št. 1342/2008 je trajnostno izkoriščanje, s katerim se ti staleži trske obnavljajo in ohranjajo nad ravnmi, ki omogočajo največji trajnostni donos (maximum sustainable yield, MSY).
The scientific evaluation of the performance of Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 carried out by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) has shown a number of problems with the application of that Regulation.
Znanstvena ocena izvajanja Uredbe (ES) št. 1342/2008, ki jo je opravil Znanstveni, tehnični in gospodarski odbor za ribištvo (STECF), je razkrila številne težave v zvezi z uporabo navedene uredbe.
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) has suggested a re-evaluation of the management strategy, in particular following a change in its perception of the North Sea stock.
Mednarodni svet za raziskovanje morja (ICES) je predlagal ponovno oceno strategije upravljanja, zlasti zaradi svojega spremenjenega dojemanja staleža v Severnem morju.
With the application of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] as from 1 January 2014, the management framework for cod has changed fundamentally, in particular through the introduction of a landing obligation.
Okvir za upravljanje za trske se je z začetkom uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] 1. januarja 2014 korenito spremenil, zlasti z uvedbo obveznosti iztovarjanja.
New multiannual plans for multi-species fisheries in various Atlantic regions, based on Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, are currently being prepared.
V teku je oblikovanje novih večletnih načrtov za ribolov več vrst v različnih regijah Atlantika na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013.
Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 will eventually be superseded, for each relevant area, by those new multiannual plans for multi-species fisheries.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1342/2008 bodo za vsako ustrezno območje nadomestili ti novi večletni načrti za ribolov več vrst.
Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 will therefore continue to apply for only a short period of time.
Uredba (EU) št. 1342/2008 se bo tako uporabljala le še kratek čas.
However, a number of urgent amendments should nevertheless be made to Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 to cover the period until the new multiannual plans for multi-species fisheries start to apply.
Vendar bi jo bilo treba kljub temu na več mestih nujno spremeniti, za obdobje do začetka uporabe novih večletnih načrtov za ribolov več vrst.
The fishing effort regime set out in Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 resulted in a number of achievements concerning selectivity and other measures to avoid catching cod, but it has become an obstacle to the implementation of the landing obligation, as it hampers further adaptation of fishing patterns, such as the choice of area and gear.
Ureditev ribolovnega napora iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1342/2008 je omogočila več dosežkov pri selektivnosti in drugih ukrepih za preprečevanje ulova trske, vendar pa je začela ovirati izvajanje obveznosti iztovarjanja, saj negativno vpliva na nadaljnje prilagajanje ribolovnih vzorcev, kot sta izbira ribolovnega območja in orodja.
The fishing effort regime should therefore be discontinued.
Zato bi bilo treba to ureditev ribolovnega napora prenehati uporabljati.
As Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 triggered considerable improvements in selectivity and cod avoidance through incentives that were linked to the fishing effort regime and through national measures (cod avoidance or discard reduction plans), it is of utmost importance that, while the landing obligation is introduced for all catches of cod in accordance with the timetable for its introduction set out in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, Member States having a direct interest in the fisheries continue, or further develop, those national measures.
Uredba (ES) št. 1342/2008 je s spodbudami, povezanimi z ureditvijo ribolovnega napora, ter nacionalnimi ukrepi (načrti za preprečevanje ulova trske oziroma za zmanjšanje zavržkov) pripomogla k precejšnjim izboljšavam pri selektivnosti in preprečevanju ulova trske, zato je – ob uvedbi obveznosti iztovarjanja celotnega ulova trsk v skladu s časovnim načrtom za njeno uvedbo iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013 – izjemno pomembno, da države članice, ki imajo neposredni interes za ta ribolov, te nacionalne ukrepe izvajajo tudi v prihodnje oziroma jih razvijajo še naprej.
During a transitional phase in which preparations are ongoing towards multiannual plans for multi-species fisheries in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 in areas now covered by Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008, management measures should take into account appropriate minimum and precautionary biomass levels.
V prehodnem obdobju priprav na oblikovanje večletnih načrtov za ribolov več vrst v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1380/2013 na območjih, ki jih sedaj ureja Uredba (ES) št. 1342/2008, bi bilo treba pri pripravi ukrepov za upravljanje upoštevati ustrezne najnižje in previdnostne ravni biomase.
If the stocks fall below safeguard biomass levels (MSY Btrigger) available in scientific advice consistent with Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, all necessary measures to address the situation should be taken.
Če se velikost staležev zmanjša pod varno raven biomase (t. i.
In some areas covered by Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008, information on the stock and the fisheries may be insufficient to determine fishing opportunities in accordance with the principle of MSY.
MSY Btrigger), ki temelji na razpoložljivem znanstvenem mnenju, skladnem z Uredbo (EU) št. 1380/2013, bi bilo treba sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za odpravo tega stanja.
In such cases, the precautionary approach should be followed.
Utegne se zgoditi, da za nekatera območja, ki jih ureja Uredba (ES) št. 1342/2008, ne bo na voljo dovolj informacij o staležu in ribolovu, da bi bilo mogoče določiti ribolovne možnosti v skladu z načelom o največjem trajnostnem donosu.
In addition to the fishing effort regime, Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 introduced a system of special fishing permits linked to a limitation of the total capacity of fishing vessels' engine power in a relevant area.
V takih primerih bi bilo treba uporabiti previdnostni pristop.
In order to avoid the disruptive dislocation of fishing activity which could have a negative impact on the stocks' recovery, it is appropriate to maintain that system, while the fishing effort regime itself is being completely discontinued.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1342/2008 je bil poleg ureditve ribolovnega napora uveden tudi sistem posebnih ribolovnih dovoljenj, ki se navezuje na omejitev skupne zmogljivosti moči motorja ribiških plovil na določenem območju.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 [5] repealed a number of provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 that referred to Annexes II and III thereto.
Da bi preprečili motečo preusmeritev ribolovnih dejavnosti, ki bi lahko negativno vplivala na obnovitev staležev, je primerno, da se ta sistem ohrani, sama ureditev ribolovnega napora pa se dokončno preneha uporabljati.
Since there are no other references in Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 to those Annexes, they became obsolete and should be deleted.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 [5] je bilo razveljavljenih več določb Uredbe (ES) št. 1342/2008, ki so vsebovale sklicevanje na prilogi II in III k navedeni uredbi.
Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Ker v Uredbi (ES) št. 1342/2008 ni drugih sklicevanj na navedeni prilogi, sta ti postali brezpredmetni in bi ju bilo treba črtati.
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Uredbo (ES) št. 1342/2008 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 is amended as follows:
Člen 1
Article 2 is replaced by the following:
Uredba (ES) št. 1342/2008 se spremeni:
‘Article 2
Člen 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Definitions
„Člen 2
For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions laid down in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply.(2) Article 4 is deleted;
Opredelitev pojmov
Article 5 is replaced by the following:
V tej uredbi se uporabljajo opredelitve iz člena 4(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.2. člen 4 se črta;
‘Article 5
člen 5 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Objective of the plan
„Člen 5