natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to point 8.5 of Annex IIB to Regulation (EU) 2016/72, the Commission may, on the basis of permanent cessations of fishing activities that took place between 1 February 2015 and 31 January 2016 and subject to conditions set out in point 8.5 of Annex IIB to Regulation (EU) 2016/72, allocate an additional number of days at sea on which a vessel may be authorised by its flag Member State to be present within the relevant area when carrying on board regulated gear.
V skladu s točko 8.5 Priloge IIB k Uredbi (EU) 2016/72 lahko Komisija na podlagi dokončne prekinitve ribolovnih dejavnosti v obdobju med 1. februarjem 2015 in 31. januarjem 2016 ter ob upoštevanju pogojev iz točke 8.5 Priloge IIB k Uredbi (EU) 2016/72, dodeli dodatno število dni na morju, med katerimi je lahko plovilo z odobritvijo države članice zastave prisotno na zadevnem območju, če ima na krovu regulirano orodje.
On 27 May 2016, in accordance with point 8.4 of Annex IIB of Regulation (EU) 2016/72, Spain submitted, together with supporting information, a request for additional days at sea on the basis of the permanent cessation of fishing activity.
V skladu s točko 8.4 Priloge IIB k Uredbi (EU) 2016/72 je Španija 27. maja 2016 skupaj z dokazili predložila zahtevek za dodelitev dodatnih dni na morju na podlagi dokončne ustavitve ribolovnih dejavnosti.
On 6 June 2016 Spain confirmed that 14 vessels ceased fishing activities between 1 February 2015 and 31 January 2016.
Španija je 6. junija 2016 potrdila, da je med 1. februarjem 2015 in 31. januarjem 2016 ribolovne dejavnosti ustavilo 14 plovil.
In view of the data made available to the Commission and having regard to the calculation method laid down in point 8.2 of Annex IIB to Regulation (EU) 2016/72, nine additional days at sea for the vessels referred to in point 1 of that Annex should be allocated to Spain for the period from 1 February 2016 to 31 January 2017.
Glede na podatke, ki so bili dani na voljo Komisiji, in ob upoštevanju metode izračuna iz točke 8.2 Priloge IIB k Uredbi (EU) 2016/72 bi bilo treba Španiji za plovila iz točke 1 navedene priloge za obdobje med 1. februarjem 2016 in 31. januarjem 2017 dodeliti devet dodatnih dni na morju.
The maximum number of days at sea for which Spain may authorise a vessel flying its flag to be present in ICES Divisions VIIIc and IXa, excluding the Gulf of Cádiz, carrying on board or deploying regulated gear and not being subject to special conditions, as laid down in Table I of Annex IIB to Regulation (EU) 2016/72, shall be increased to 126 days per year.
Največje število dni na morju, ki ga Španija lahko odobri plovilu, ki pluje pod njeno zastavo, da je prisotno v razdelkih ICES VIIIc in IXa z izjemo Cadiškega zaliva, če ima na krovu ali uporablja regulirano orodje in zanj ne veljajo posebni pogoji, kakor je opredeljeno v tabeli I Priloge IIB k Uredbi (EU) 2016/72, se poveča na 126 dni na leto.
OJ L 22, 28.1.2016, p. 1.
UL L 22, 28.1.2016, str. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2076
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/2076
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/2080
opening the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure
o začetku prodaje posnetega mleka v prahu z razpisnim postopkom
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov kmetijskih proizvodov in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 922/72, (EGS) št. 234/79, (ES) št. 1037/2001 in (ES) št. 1234/2007 [1],
Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 of 18 May 2016 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention and aid for private storage [2], and in particular Article 28 and Article 31(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2016/1240 z dne 18. maja 2016 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede javne intervencije in pomoči za zasebno skladiščenje [2] ter zlasti člena 28 in člena 31(1) Uredbe,
Given the current situation on the skimmed milk powder market in terms of price recovery and the high level of intervention stocks it is appropriate to open the sale of skimmed milk powder from public intervention by a tendering procedure in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240.
Glede na trenutno stanje na trgu posnetega mleka v prahu z vidika povrnitev cen in visoke stopnje intervencijskih zalog je primerno začeti prodajo posnetega mleka v prahu iz javne intervencije z razpisnim postopkom v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/1240.
In order to manage sales from intervention in an adequate way, it is necessary to specify the date before which the skimmed milk powder that is available for sale must have entered into public intervention.
Za ustrezno upravljanje prodaje intervencijskih proizvodov je treba določiti datum, pred katerim mora biti posneto mleko v prahu, ki je na voljo za prodajo, sprejeto v javno intervencijo.
Pursuant to Article 28(4)(b), (c) and (d) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240, it is necessary to fix the periods for the submission of tenders, the minimum quantity for which a tender may be submitted and the amount of the security that has to be lodged when submitting a tender.
V skladu s členom 28(4)(b), (c) in (d) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/1240 je treba določiti obdobja za predložitev ponudb, najmanjšo količino, za katero se lahko predloži ponudba, in znesek varščine, ki se položi ob predložitvi ponudbe.
For the purposes of Article 31(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240, it is necessary to lay down the time limits by which Member States are to notify the Commission of all admissible tenders.
Za namene člena 31(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/1240 je treba določiti roke, do katerih morajo države članice uradno obvestiti Komisijo o vseh dopustnih ponudbah.
In the interests of an efficient administration, Member States should make their notifications to the Commission in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 792/2009 [3].
Za učinkovito upravljanje bi morale države članice Komisijo obveščati v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 792/2009 [3].
The Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its chair,
Odbor za skupno ureditev kmetijskih trgov ni podal mnenja v roku, ki ga je določil njegov predsednik –
Sales by a tendering procedure of skimmed milk powder entered into storage before 1 November 2015 are open under the conditions provided for in Chapter III of Title II of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240.
Prodaja z razpisnim postopkom posnetega mleka v prahu, ki je bilo uskladiščeno pred 1. novembrom 2015, se začne pod pogoji iz poglavja III naslova II Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/1240.
The period during which tenders may be submitted in response to the first partial invitation to tender shall end on 13 December 2016 at 11.00 (Brussels time).
Obdobje za predložitev ponudb za prvi delni javni razpis se konča 13. decembra 2016 ob 11.00 (po bruseljskem času).
They shall end at 11.00 (Brussels time) on the first and third Tuesday of the month.
Končajo se ob 11.00 (po bruseljskem času) vsak prvi in tretji torek v mesecu.
However, in August it shall be 11.00 (Brussels time) on the fourth Tuesday and in December it shall be 11.00 (Brussels time) on the second Tuesday.
Vendar je avgusta ta rok ob 11.00 (po bruseljskem času) na četrti torek v mesecu, decembra pa ob 11.00 (po bruseljskem času) na drugi torek v mesecu.
If Tuesday is a public holiday the time limit shall be 11.00 (Brussels time) on the previous working day.
Če je na torek državni praznik, se rok izteče ob 11.00 (po bruseljskem času) predhodni delovni dan.
Tenders shall be submitted to the paying agencies approved by the Member States [4].
Ponudbe se predložijo plačilnim agencijam, ki jih odobrijo države članice [4].
Quantity per tender and unit of measurement
Količina za posamezno ponudbo in merska enota
The minimum quantity of skimmed milk powder for which a tender may be submitted shall be 20 tonnes.
Najmanjša količina posnetega mleka v prahu, za katero se lahko predloži ponudba, je 20 ton.
The proposed price shall be the price per 100 kg of product.
Predlagana cena ustreza ceni na 100 kg proizvoda.
When submitting a tender for the sale of skimmed milk powder, a security of EUR 50/tonne shall be lodged to the paying agency where the tender is submitted.
Pri plačilni agenciji se ob predložitvi ponudbe za prodajo posnetega mleka v prahu položi varščina v višini 50 EUR/tono.
The notification provided for in Article 31(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 shall be made in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 792/2009 by 16.00 (Brussels time) on the days referred to in Article 2 of this Regulation.
Uradna obvestila iz člena 31(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1240 se pošljejo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 792/2009 do 16.00 (po bruseljskem času) na dneve iz člena 2 te uredbe.
671.
UL L 206, 30.7.2016, str. 71.
OJ L 206, 30.7.2016, p.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 792/2009 z dne 31. avgusta 2009 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za pošiljanje informacij in dokumentov držav članic Komisiji pri izvajanju skupnih tržnih ureditev, sheme neposrednih plačil, promocije kmetijskih proizvodov in shem, ki veljajo za najbolj oddaljene regije in manjše egejske otoke (UL L 228, 1.9.2009, str. 3).
71.
Naslovi plačilnih agencij so na voljo na spletišču Evropske komisije http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/milk/policy-instruments/index_en.htm.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2081
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/2081
re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of oxalic acid originating in the People's Republic of China and produced by Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
o ponovni uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki jo proizvaja podjetje Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1], and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije [1] in zlasti člena 9(4) Uredbe,
On 18 April 2012, by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 325/2012 [2] (‘the contested regulation’), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of oxalic acid originating in India and the People's Republic of China in the range of 14,6 % to 52,2 % following an anti-dumping investigation under Article 5 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 [3].
Svet je 18. aprila 2012 z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 325/2012 [2] („izpodbijana uredba“) uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Indije in Ljudske republike Kitajske v razponu od 14,6 % do 52,2 % po protidampinški preiskavi na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 [3].
By judgment of 20 May 2015 [4], the General Court annulled the contested regulation, in so far as Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
S sodbo z dne 20. maja 2015 [4] je Splošno sodišče razglasilo ničnost dela izpodbijane uredbe, ki zadeva podjetje Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Ltd, a cooperating Chinese exporting producer, is concerned.
Ltd, sodelujočega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The General Court ruled that the Council's reasoning concerning two matters on the determination of the injury elimination level did not comply with Article 296 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union.
Splošno sodišče je razsodilo, da obrazložitev Sveta glede dveh zadev za določitev stopnje odprave škode ni bila v skladu s členom 296 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Following the General Court's judgment, the Commission published a Notice informing that it had decided to resume the anti-dumping investigation concerning oxalic acid for the purposes of implementing the judgment in regard to Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Po sodbi Splošnega sodišča je Komisija objavila obvestilo, da je sklenila obnoviti protidampinško preiskavo v zvezi z oksalno kislino za izvajanje sodbe v zvezi s podjetjem Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
B. IMPLEMENTATION
B. IZVAJANJE
Customs duty for the calculation of the injury elimination level (injury margin)
Carina za izračun stopnje odprave škode (stopnja škode)
As stated in recitals 66 and 83 of the contested regulation, Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (66) in (83) izpodbijane uredbe, je podjetje Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Ltd had claimed that the Commission had failed to include fully an allowance of 6,5 % corresponding to the normal customs duty in the injury margin calculation.
Ltd trdilo, da Komisija pri izračunu stopnje škode ni v celoti vključila popravka v višini 6,5 %, ki ustreza običajni carini.
The Commission had found in the original investigation that the claim was warranted and it had revised the calculations with regard to the injury margin as follows: the final weighted average import price was calculated by adding, to the weighted average CIF Union border export price of Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Komisija je v prvotni preiskavi ugotovila, da je bila trditev utemeljena in je pregledala izračune v zvezi s stopnjo škode, kot sledi: končna tehtana povprečna uvozna cena je bila izračunana tako, da se je tehtanemu povprečju izvozne cene CIF meja Unije podjetja Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Ltd, for the two types of oxalic acid (refined and unrefined) first, 6,5 % for customs duties, and then, a fixed amount of 10 EUR/tonne for post-importation costs.
Ltd za obe vrsti oksalne kisline (rafinirano in nerafinirano) dodalo 6,5 % za carine in nato fiksni znesek 10 EUR/tono za stroške, nastale po uvozu.
The result was a reduction of the Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Rezultat je bilo znižanje stopnje škode za podjetje Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co., Ltd na 18,7 %.
Ltd's injury margin to 18,7 %.
Vendar, kot je bilo že navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (83) in (87) izpodbijane uredbe, je znižana stopnja škode ostala nad stopnjo dampinga, ugotovljeno za podjetje Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
However, as already indicated in recitals 83 and 87 of the contested regulation, the reduced injury margin remained above the dumping margin established for Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co.
Ltd (14,6 %), kar je bila podlaga za uvedeno protidampinško dajatev.
Ltd (14,6 %), which is the basis for the anti-dumping duty imposed.
Stopnja dobička za izračun stopnje odprave škode (stopnja škode)
Profit margin for the calculation of the injury elimination level (injury margin)
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (142) in (143) Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1043/2011 [5] o uvedbi začasnih ukrepov v obravnavani zadevi in kot je bilo potrjeno z izpodbijano uredbo, je dobiček, ki se uporabi za izračun stopnje odprave škode, znašal 8 % prometa, kar je dobiček, za katerega bi industrija Unije lahko upravičeno pričakovala, da ga bo dosegla pri normalnih konkurenčnih pogojih, če ne bi bilo škodljivega dampinga.
As stated in recitals 142 and 143 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1043/2011 [5] imposing provisional measures in the case at hand, and as confirmed by the contested regulation, the profit used for the calculation of the injury elimination level was 8 % of turnover, which was considered being the profit that the Union industry could reasonably have expected to achieve under normal conditions of competition in the absence of injurious dumping.
Pogoji za uporabo tega zneska so obravnavani v nadaljevanju.
The considerations for the use of this figure are discussed as follows.
V preiskavi, ki je privedla do izpodbijane uredbe, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju poslovala z izgubo ali z zelo malo dobička.
In the investigation leading to the contested regulation it was established that during the period considered the Union industry was either loss-making or making a very limited profit.
Ta stopnja dobička je bila prenizka, da bi ohranila proizvodnjo v srednjeročnem obdobju.
That level of profits was insufficient to maintain the production in the medium term.
Poleg tega so bile v obdobju, zajetem v prvotni preiskavi, znatne količine uvoza v povprečju po cenah, ki so bile nižje od cen, za katere je bilo v obdobju prvotne preiskave ugotovljeno, da so bile dampinške.
In addition, during the period considered in the original investigation there were significant amounts of imports, at price levels that on average were lower than the prices found to be dumped in the original investigation period.
Ti uvozi po nizkih cenah so imeli negativen učinek na gospodarsko uspešnost industrije Unije.
These low priced imports had a negative impact on the economic performance of the Union industry.
Zato se stopenj dobička, ki jih je dejansko realizirala industrija Unije v zajetem obdobju, ne more šteti za dobiček, ki bi ga industrija Unije lahko razumno realizirala pri normalnih konkurenčnih pogojih.
Therefore, the levels of profit actually realised by the Union industry during the period considered could not be considered as a profit that the Union industry could reasonably expect to achieve under normal conditions of competition.
Poleg tega je bilo v prvotni preiskavi ugotovljeno, da Komisija ni zbrala nobenih podatkov o dobičku industrije Unije za obdobje pred zajetim obdobjem.
Furthermore, during the original investigation, the Commission did not collect any data regarding Union industry's profit for a period before the period considered.
Zato ni bilo na voljo podatkov o dobičku industrije Unije v obdobju neposredno pred zajetim obdobjem, ki bi se lahko uporabili kot razumna stopnja dobička za izračun stopnje škode.
Consequently, no profit data relating to the Union industry for a period immediately before the period considered, that could be used as a reasonable profit margin for the calculation of the injury margin, was available.
Po razkritju je podjetje Yuanping trdilo, da bi službe Komisije morale uporabiti informacije, ki ne zadevajo zajetega obdobja, da bi ustrezno ocenile ciljni dobiček.
Following disclosure, Yuanping argued that the Commission services should have used information falling outside the period considered in order to make a proper assessment for establishing the target profit.
Ta trditev ni bila sprejeta.
This claim was not accepted.
Sodišča EU so priznala široko pooblastilo Komisiji za izbiro obdobja, ki se upošteva pri določanju škode [6].
The EU Courts have recognised the Commission a wide discretion as regards the period to be taken into account for the purpose of determining injury [6].
Komisija je na začetku prvotne preiskave določila rok za zbiranje podatkov za oceno škode, tj. zajeto obdobje (od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2010), in ni zbirala podatkov, ki ne spadajo v to obdobje.
The Commission, at the beginning of the original investigation, set out a period to collect data for the assessment of injury, i.e. the period considered, (1 January 2007 to 31 December 2010), and it did not collect data falling outside that period.
Poleg tega, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 23, bi se morala Komisija v okviru te ponovne preiskave zanašati le na informacije, ki so bile na voljo v času prvotne preiskave.
Furthermore, as explained in recital 23 below, within the scope of this resumption of the investigation, the Commission has to rely only on the information that was available during the original investigation.
Komisija je zato analizirala ciljni dobiček, ki ga je predlagal pritožnik v preiskavi, ki je privedla do izpodbijane uredbe.
The Commission therefore analysed the target profit proposed by the complainant in the investigation leading to the contested regulation.
V pritožbi se za izračun stopnje škode predlaga 10-odstotna ciljna stopnja dobička.
In the complaint, a target profit margin of 10 % for the calculation of the injury margin was proposed.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija ugotovila, da je stopna dobička, ki jo je Svet uporabil v prejšnji preiskavi v zvezi z uvozom oksalne kisline s poreklom iz Indije in Ljudske republike Kitajske v letu 1991, znašala 10 % [7].
In this respect, the Commission noted that the profit margin used by the Council in a previous investigation concerning imports of oxalic acid from India and the People's Republic of China in 1991 was 10 % [7].
Pritožnik je to številko upravičil s trditvijo, da je takšno stopnjo dobičkonosnosti mogoče doseči, če se uporabljajo vse proizvodne zmogljivosti.
The complainant justified the figure by arguing that such a level of profitability could be achieved if it produced at full capacity utilisation.
Vendar se stopnja dobička, ki jo predlaga pritožnik, ne nanaša na dejanske podatke o dobičku, ustvarjenem v odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza pri normalnih konkurenčnih pogojih, temveč na teoretično situacijo, v kateri se uporabljajo vse proizvodne zmogljivosti.
However, the profit margin proposed by the complainant does not relate to actual data on profit achieved in the absence of dumped imports under normal conditions of competition, but to a theoretical situation of full capacity utilisation.
Ker pritožnik ni dokazal, da lahko polno uporabo proizvodnih zmogljivosti, na kateri temelji predlagana stopnja dobička, doseže pri normalnih tržnih pogojih v odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza, navedene stopnje dobička ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za ta namen.
Given that the complainant did not demonstrate that the full capacity utilisation on which it based the proposed target profit was, or could be, achieved under normal market conditions in the absence of the dumped imports the claimed target profit could not be used for this reason.
V teh okoliščinah je Komisija preučila stopnjo dobička, določeno pri drugih preiskavah panog v kemijskem sektorju, ki so prav tako kapitalsko intenzivne panoge, kot je industrija oksalne kisline, in imajo podoben proizvodni postopek.
In regard to profit margins used in previous investigations in the chemical sector [8] (including the profit margin used in the previous investigation on oxalic acid) it was found that, on average, a profit margin of around 8 % had been considered constituting a reasonable profit that the Union industry could achieve under normal market conditions in the absence of injurious dumping.
Poleg tega je Komisija preučila stopnjo dobička, uporabljeno v preiskavah v zvezi z drugimi sektorji, ki so tako kot kemijski sektor kapitalsko intenzivni.
In addition, the Commission examined the profit margin used in investigations concerning other sectors which, like the chemical sector, are capital intensive.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija ugotovila, da je stopnja dobička, uporabljena v teh preiskavah [9], skladna s povprečno stopnjo dobička, ugotovljeno za kemijski sektor, vključno z oksalno kislino.
On the basis of the considerations referred to above, and absent actual data on profitability levels that could be achieved by the Union industry during the investigation period under normal conditions, and in the absence of injurious dumping, the Commission found it appropriate to establish such reasonable profit margin on the basis of the average profit margin established in anti-dumping investigations for other chemical industries, and other industries with similar characteristics, such as being capital intensive.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija sklenila, da je 8-odstotna stopnja dobička stopnja, ki jo lahko industrija Unije razumno pričakuje pri normalnih konkurenčnih pogojih, in sicer v odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza, zato bi bilo treba to stopnjo dobička uporabiti za izračun stopnje odprave škode.