natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The requested supervisory authority should be obliged to respond to the request within a specified time period.
Ta mehanizem ne bi smel posegati v noben ukrep, ki ga lahko Komisija sprejme pri izvajanju svojih pooblastil na podlagi Pogodb.
In order to ensure the consistent application of this Regulation throughout the Union, a consistency mechanism for cooperation between the supervisory authorities should be established.
Pri uporabi mehanizma za skladnost bi moral odbor v določenem roku podati mnenje, če tako odloči večina članov ali če to zahteva kateri koli zadevni nadzorni organ ali Komisija.
That mechanism should in particular apply where a supervisory authority intends to adopt a measure intended to produce legal effects as regards processing operations which substantially affect a significant number of data subjects in several Member States.
Odbor bi moral biti tudi pooblaščen za sprejemanje pravno zavezujočih odločitev v primeru sporov med nadzornimi organi.
It should also apply where any supervisory authority concerned or the Commission requests that such matter should be handled in the consistency mechanism.
V ta namen bi moral načeloma z dvotretjinsko večino svojih članov izdajati pravno zavezujoče odločitve v jasno določenih primerih, ko pride med nadzornimi organi, zlasti v mehanizmu sodelovanja med vodilnim nadzornim organom in zadevnimi nadzornimi organi, do nasprotujočih si stališč glede vsebine zadeve, predvsem glede tega, ali je bila uredba kršena.
That mechanism should be without prejudice to any measures that the Commission may take in the exercise of its powers under the Treaties.
Lahko se pojavi nujna potreba po ukrepanju za zaščito pravic in svoboščin posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, zlasti kadar obstaja nevarnost, da bi lahko bilo uresničevanje pravice posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, močno ovirano.
In applying the consistency mechanism, the Board should, within a determined period of time, issue an opinion, if a majority of its members so decides or if so requested by any supervisory authority concerned or the Commission.
Nadzorni organ bi zato moral imeti možnost,da na ozemlju, na katerem deluje, sprejme ustrezno utemeljene začasne ukrepe z določenim obdobjem veljavnosti, ki ne bi smelo biti daljše od treh mesecev.
The Board should also be empowered to adopt legally binding decisions where there are disputes between supervisory authorities.
Uporaba takega mehanizma bi morala biti pogoj za zakonitost ukrepa, katerega namen je doseči pravne učinke, ki ga sprejme nadzorni organ v primerih, v katerih je uporaba tega mehanizma obvezna.
For that purpose, it should issue, in principle by a two-thirds majority of its members, legally binding decisions in clearly specified cases where there are conflicting views among supervisory authorities, in particular in the cooperation mechanism between the lead supervisory authority and supervisory authorities concerned on the merits of the case, in particular whether there is an infringement of this Regulation.
V drugih primerih čezmejnega pomena bi bilo treba uporabiti mehanizem sodelovanja med vodilnim nadzornim organom in zadevnimi nadzornimi organi, med zadevnimi nadzornimi organi pa bi se lahko izvajala medsebojna pomoč in skupno ukrepanje na dvostranski ali večstranski podlagi, ne da bi pri tem sprožili mehanizem za skladnost.
There may be an urgent need to act in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular when the danger exists that the enforcement of a right of a data subject could be considerably impeded.
Za spodbujanje dosledne uporabe te uredbe bi bilo treba odbor ustanoviti kot neodvisen organ Unije.
A supervisory authority should therefore be able to adopt duly justified provisional measures on its territory with a specified period of validity which should not exceed three months.
Odbor bi moral biti zaradi doseganja svojih ciljev pravna oseba.
The application of such mechanism should be a condition for the lawfulness of a measure intended to produce legal effects by a supervisory authority in those cases where its application is mandatory.
Zastopati bi ga moral njegov predsednik.
In other cases of cross-border relevance, the cooperation mechanism between the lead supervisory authority and supervisory authorities concerned should be applied and mutual assistance and joint operations might be carried out between the supervisory authorities concerned on a bilateral or multilateral basis without triggering the consistency mechanism.
Moral bi nadomestiti Delovno skupino za varstvo posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov, ustanovljeno z Direktivo 95/46/ES.
In order to promote the consistent application of this Regulation, the Board should be set up as an independent body of the Union.
Sestavljati bi ga morali vodje nadzornega organa vsake države članice in Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov ali njihovi predstavniki.
To fulfil its objectives, the Board should have legal personality.
Komisija bi morala pri dejavnostih odbora sodelovati brez glasovalnih pravic, Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov pa bi moral imeti posebne glasovalne pravice.
The Board should be represented by its Chair.
Odbor bi moral prispevati k dosledni uporabi te uredbe v vsej Uniji, vključno s svetovanjem Komisiji, zlasti o ravni varstva v tretjih državah ali mednarodnih organizacijah, in spodbujanjem sodelovanja nadzornih organov v vsej Uniji.
It should replace the Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC.
Pri opravljanju svojih nalog bi moral delovati neodvisno.
It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each Member State and the European Data Protection Supervisor or their respective representatives.
Odboru bi moral pomagati sekretariat, ki ga zagotovi Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov.
The Commission should participate in the Board's activities without voting rights and the European Data Protection Supervisor should have specific voting rights.
Osebje Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov, ki opravlja naloge, ki so v skladu s to uredbo dodeljene odboru, bi moralo svoje naloge opravljati izključno po navodilih predsednika odbora in temu tudi poročati.
The Board should contribute to the consistent application of this Regulation throughout the Union, including by advising the Commission, in particular on the level of protection in third countries or international organisations, and promoting cooperation of the supervisory authorities throughout the Union.
Vsak posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, bi moral imeti pravico, da vloži pritožbo pri enem nadzornem organu, zlasti v državi članici svojega običajnega prebivališča, in pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva v skladu s členom 47 Listine, kadar meni, da so njegove pravice iz te uredbe kršene, ali če nadzorni organ ne obravnava pritožbe, jo v celoti ali deloma zavrže ali zavrne ali ne ukrepa, kadar je tak ukrep potreben za zaščito pravic posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki.
The Board should act independently when performing its tasks.
Preiskavo na podlagi pritožbe bi bilo treba izvesti v obsegu, ki je v posamezni zadevi ustrezen, saj je lahko odločitev nadzornega organa predmet sodne presoje.
The Board should be assisted by a secretariat provided by the European Data Protection Supervisor.
Nadzorni organ bi moral posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, v ustreznem roku obvestiti o stanju zadeve in odločitvi o pritožbi.
The staff of the European Data Protection Supervisor involved in carrying out the tasks conferred on the Board by this Regulation should perform its tasks exclusively under the instructions of, and report to, the Chair of the Board.
Če mora nadzorni organ zadevo podrobneje preučiti ali se uskladiti z drugim nadzornim organom, bi bilo treba posamezniku, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, posredovati informacije o stanju zadeve med postopkom.
Every data subject should have the right to lodge a complaint with a single supervisory authority, in particular in the Member State of his or her habitual residence, and the right to an effective judicial remedy in accordance with Article 47 of the Charter if the data subject considers that his or her rights under this Regulation are infringed or where the supervisory authority does not act on a complaint, partially or wholly rejects or dismisses a complaint or does not act where such action is necessary to protect the rights of the data subject.
Za poenostavitev postopka vložitve pritožbe bi moral vsak nadzorni organ sprejeti ukrepe, na primer za zagotovitev obrazca za vložitev pritožbe, ki se lahko izpolni tudi elektronsko, pri čemer niso izključena druga komunikacijska sredstva.
The investigation following a complaint should be carried out, subject to judicial review, to the extent that is appropriate in the specific case.
Kadar posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, meni, da so bile kršene njegove pravice iz te uredbe, bi moral imeti pravico, da pooblasti telo, organizacijo ali združenje, ki je nepridobitne narave, ustanovljeno v skladu s pravom države članice, katerega statutarno določeni cilji so v javnem interesu ter je dejavno na področju varstva osebnih podatkov, da v njegovem imenu vloži pritožbo pri nadzornem organu, uveljavlja pravico do pravnega sredstva v imenu posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, ali, če je tako določeno v pravu države članice, uveljavlja pravico do odškodnine v imenu posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
The supervisory authority should inform the data subject of the progress and the outcome of the complaint within a reasonable period.
Država članica lahko zahteva, da mora tako telo, organizacija ali združenje imeti pravico, da neodvisno od pooblastila posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, v tej državi članici vloži pritožbo, in pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, kadar utemeljeno meni, da so bile pravice posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, kršene zaradi obdelave osebnih podatkov, ki krši to uredbo.
If the case requires further investigation or coordination with another supervisory authority, intermediate information should be given to the data subject.
To telo, organizacija ali združenje ne sme zahtevati odškodnine v imenu posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, neodvisno od pooblastila posameznika.
In order to facilitate the submission of complaints, each supervisory authority should take measures such as providing a complaint submission form which can also be completed electronically, without excluding other means of communication.
Katera koli fizična ali pravna oseba ima pravico, da pred Sodiščem pod pogoji iz člena 263 PDEU vloži ničnostno tožbo zoper odločitve odbora.
Where a data subject considers that his or her rights under this Regulation are infringed, he or she should have the right to mandate a not-for-profit body, organisation or association which is constituted in accordance with the law of a Member State, has statutory objectives which are in the public interest and is active in the field of the protection of personal data to lodge a complaint on his or her behalf with a supervisory authority, exercise the right to a judicial remedy on behalf of data subjects or, if provided for in Member State law, exercise the right to receive compensation on behalf of data subjects.
Zadevni nadzorni organi, ki želijo take odločitve izpodbijati, morajo kot njihovi naslovniki v skladu s členom 263 PDEU tožbo vložiti v dveh mesecih po tem, ko so bili o njih uradno obveščeni.
A Member State may provide for such a body, organisation or association to have the right to lodge a complaint in that Member State, independently of a data subject's mandate, and the right to an effective judicial remedy where it has reasons to consider that the rights of a data subject have been infringed as a result of the processing of personal data which infringes this Regulation.
Kadar se odločitve odbora podatkov nanašajo neposredno in posamično na upravljavca, obdelovalca ali pritožnika, lahko ta vloži ničnostno tožbo zoper te odločitve, to pa mora v skladu s členom 263 PDEU storiti v dveh mesecih od objave teh odločitev na spletnem mestu odbora.
That body, organisation or association may not be allowed to claim compensation on a data subject's behalf independently of the data subject's mandate.
Brez poseganja v to pravico na podlagi člena 263 PDEU, bi morala imeti vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba na voljo učinkovito pravno sredstvo pred pristojnim nacionalnim sodiščem zoper odločitev nadzornega organa, ki ima pravne učinke za to osebo.
Any natural or legal person has the right to bring an action for annulment of decisions of the Board before the Court of Justice under the conditions provided for in Article 263 TFEU.
Taka odločitev se nanaša zlasti na izvajanje preiskovalnih pooblastil nadzornega organa, popravljalnih pooblastil in pooblastil v zvezi z dovoljenji ali na zavržene ali zavrnjene pritožbe.
As addressees of such decisions, the supervisory authorities concerned which wish to challenge them have to bring action within two months of being notified of them, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU.
Vendar pa pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva ne zajema ukrepov nadzornih organov, ki niso pravno zavezujoči, kot so mnenja, ki jih izdajo nadzorni organi, ali njihovi nasveti.
Where decisions of the Board are of direct and individual concern to a controller, processor or complainant, the latter may bring an action for annulment against those decisions within two months of their publication on the website of the Board, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU.
Za postopke zoper nadzorni organ bi morala biti pristojna sodišča države članice, v kateri ima nadzorni organ sedež, izvajati pa bi se morali v skladu s postopkovnim pravom te države članice.
Without prejudice to this right under Article 263 TFEU, each natural or legal person should have an effective judicial remedy before the competent national court against a decision of a supervisory authority which produces legal effects concerning that person.
Ta sodišča bi morala izvajati polno pristojnost, ki bi morala vključevati pristojnost za preučitev vseh vprašanj, ki se nanašajo na dejstva in zakonodajo v zvezi z zadevnim sporom.
Such a decision concerns in particular the exercise of investigative, corrective and authorisation powers by the supervisory authority or the dismissal or rejection of complaints.
Kadar nadzorni organ zavrne ali zavrže pritožbo, lahko pritožnik sproži postopke na sodiščih v isti državi članici.
However, the right to an effective judicial remedy does not encompass measures taken by supervisory authorities which are not legally binding, such as opinions issued by or advice provided by the supervisory authority.
V okviru pravnih sredstev, ki se nanašajo na uporabo te uredbe, lahko nacionalna sodišča, ki obravnavajo odločitev o vprašanju, potrebno za to, da lahko izrečejo sodbo, od Sodišča zahtevajo predhodno odločanje v zvezi z razlago prava Unije, vključno s to uredbo, v primeru iz člena 267 PDEU pa ga morajo zahtevati.
Proceedings against a supervisory authority should be brought before the courts of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established and should be conducted in accordance with that Member State's procedural law.
Poleg tega, kadar se odločitev nadzornega organa, s katero se uveljavlja odločitev odbora, izpodbija pred nacionalnim sodiščem in je sporna veljavnost odločitve odbora, to nacionalno sodišče ni pristojno za razglasitev neveljavnosti odločitve odbora, temveč mora vprašanje veljavnosti, če meni, da je odločitev neveljavna, predložiti Sodišču v skladu s členom 267 PDEU, kakor ga razlaga Sodišče.
Those courts should exercise full jurisdiction, which should include jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to the dispute before them.
Po drugi strani pa nacionalno sodišče ne sme predložiti vprašanja veljavnosti odločitve odbora na zahtevo fizične ali pravne osebe, ki je imela možnost vložiti ničnostno tožbo zoper to odločitev, zlasti če se je ta neposredno in posamično nanašala nanjo, pa tega ni storila v roku iz člena 263 PDEU.
Where a complaint has been rejected or dismissed by a supervisory authority, the complainant may bring proceedings before the courts in the same Member State.
Kadar sodišče, pred katerim poteka postopek zoper odločitev nadzornega organa, utemeljeno meni, da v zvezi z enako obdelavo, kot je enaka vsebina, kar zadeva obdelavo s strani istega upravljavca ali obdelovalca, ali enaka podlaga za tožbo, predloži zadevo pristojnemu sodišču v drugi državi članici, bi moralo obvestiti zadevno sodišče, da se potrdi obstoj povezanih postopkov.
In the context of judicial remedies relating to the application of this Regulation, national courts which consider a decision on the question necessary to enable them to give judgment, may, or in the case provided for in Article 267 TFEU, must, request the Court of Justice to give a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Union law, including this Regulation.
Če povezani postopki potekajo pred sodiščem v drugi državi članici, lahko katero koli sodišče, razen sodišča, ki je prvo začelo postopek, zaustavi postopek ali na zahtevo ene od strank zavrne pristojnost v prid sodišča, ki je prvo začelo postopek, če je to sodišče pristojno za zadevne postopke in lahko v skladu s svojim pravom združi tako povezane postopke.
Furthermore, where a decision of a supervisory authority implementing a decision of the Board is challenged before a national court and the validity of the decision of the Board is at issue, that national court does not have the power to declare the Board's decision invalid but must refer the question of validity to the Court of Justice in accordance with Article 267 TFEU as interpreted by the Court of Justice, where it considers the decision invalid.
Postopki veljajo za povezane, kadar so med seboj tako tesno povezani, da se zdita njihova skupna obravnava in skupno odločanje o njih smiselna, da bi se izognili nevarnosti nezdružljivih sodb, ki bi izhajale iz ločenih postopkov.
However, a national court may not refer a question on the validity of the decision of the Board at the request of a natural or legal person which had the opportunity to bring an action for annulment of that decision, in particular if it was directly and individually concerned by that decision, but had not done so within the period laid down in Article 263 TFEU.
V postopkih zoper upravljavca ali obdelovalca bi morala imeti tožeča stranka možnost, da postopek začne pred sodišči države članice, v kateri ima upravljavec ali obdelovalec sedež, ali pred sodišči države članice, v kateri prebiva posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, razen če je upravljavec javni organ države članice, ki izvaja svoja javna pooblastila.
Where a court seized of proceedings against a decision by a supervisory authority has reason to believe that proceedings concerning the same processing, such as the same subject matter as regards processing by the same controller or processor, or the same cause of action, are brought before a competent court in another Member State, it should contact that court in order to confirm the existence of such related proceedings.
Upravljavec ali obdelovalec bi moral povrniti vso škodo, ki jo oseba lahko utrpi zaradi obdelave, ki krši to uredbo.
If related proceedings are pending before a court in another Member State, any court other than the court first seized may stay its proceedings or may, on request of one of the parties, decline jurisdiction in favour of the court first seized if that court has jurisdiction over the proceedings in question and its law permits the consolidation of such related proceedings.
Upravljavec ali obdelovalec bi moral biti oproščen odgovornosti, če dokaže, da ni v nobenem primeru odgovoren za škodo.
Proceedings are deemed to be related where they are so closely connected that it is expedient to hear and determine them together in order to avoid the risk of irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate proceedings.
Pojem škode bi bilo treba razlagati široko ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča na način, ki, v celoti odraža cilje te uredbe.
For proceedings against a controller or processor, the plaintiff should have the choice to bring the action before the courts of the Member States where the controller or processor has an establishment or where the data subject resides, unless the controller is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers.
To je brez poseganja v kakršne koli odškodninske zahtevke, ki izhajajo iz kršitve drugih pravil prava Unije ali prava države članice.
The controller or processor should compensate any damage which a person may suffer as a result of processing that infringes this Regulation.
Obdelava, ki krši to uredbo, vključuje tudi obdelavo, ki krši delegirane in izvedbene akte, sprejete v skladu s to uredbo, in pravo države članice, ki natančneje določa pravila te uredbe.
The controller or processor should be exempt from liability if it proves that it is not in any way responsible for the damage.
Posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, bi morali prejeti celotno in učinkovito odškodnino za škodo, ki so jo utrpeli.
The concept of damage should be broadly interpreted in the light of the case-law of the Court of Justice in a manner which fully reflects the objectives of this Regulation.
Kadar so upravljavci ali obdelovalci vključeni v isto obdelavo, bi moral biti vsak upravljavec ali obdelovalec odgovoren za celotno škodo.
This is without prejudice to any claims for damage deriving from the violation of other rules in Union or Member State law.
Kadar pa so upravljavci ali obdelovalci združeni v isti sodni postopek v skladu s pravom države članice, se lahko odškodnina porazdeli v skladu z odgovornostjo vsakega upravljavca ali obdelovalca za škodo, ki je bila povzročena zaradi obdelave, če je zagotovljeno, da posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki in ki je škodo utrpel, prejme celotno in učinkovito odškodnino.
Processing that infringes this Regulation also includes processing that infringes delegated and implementing acts adopted in accordance with this Regulation and Member State law specifying rules of this Regulation.
Vsak upravljavec ali obdelovalec, ki je plačal celotno odškodnino, lahko naknadno začne postopek za povrnitev stroškov zoper druge upravljavce ali obdelovalce, vključene v isto obdelavo.
Data subjects should receive full and effective compensation for the damage they have suffered.
Kjer so v tej uredbi določena posebna pravila glede pristojnosti, zlasti kar zadeva postopke za uveljavljanje pravnega sredstva, tudi odškodnine zoper upravljavca ali obdelovalca, splošna pravila glede pristojnosti, na primer iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13], ne bi smela posegati v uporabo teh posebnih pravil.
Where controllers or processors are involved in the same processing, each controller or processor should be held liable for the entire damage.
Da bi okrepili izvrševanje pravil te uredbe, bi bilo treba poleg ustreznih ukrepov, ki jih v skladu s to uredbo naloži nadzorni organ, ali namesto njih za vsako kršitev uredbe uvesti kazni, vključno z upravnimi globami.
However, where they are joined to the same judicial proceedings, in accordance with Member State law, compensation may be apportioned according to the responsibility of each controller or processor for the damage caused by the processing, provided that full and effective compensation of the data subject who suffered the damage is ensured.
V primeru manjših kršitev ali v primeru, ko bi globa, ki bi bila verjetno naložena, predstavljala nesorazmerno breme za fizično osebo, se lahko namesto globe izreče opomin.