natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to that opinion, biocidal products of product-type 21 containing dichlofluanid may be expected to satisfy the criteria of Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, provided that certain specifications and conditions concerning their use are complied with.
Glede na navedeno mnenje je za biocidne proizvode 21. vrste proizvodov, ki vsebujejo diklofluanid, mogoče pričakovati, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 19(1)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012, če so izpolnjeni nekatere specifikacije in pogoji za njihovo uporabo.
It is therefore appropriate to approve dichlofluanid for use in biocidal products of product-type 21, subject to compliance with certain specifications and conditions.
Zato je diklofluanid primerno odobriti za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih 21. vrste proizvodov, če je ta v skladu z nekaterimi specifikacijami in pogoji.
Since dichlofluanid meets the criteria for classification as skin sensitiser category 1 as defined in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], treated articles treated with or incorporating dichlofluanid should be appropriately labelled when placed on the market.
Ker diklofluanid izpolnjuje merila za razvrstitev kot povzročitelj preobčutljivosti kože kategorije 1, kot je opredeljen v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], bi bilo treba tretirane izdelke, ki so tretirani z njim ali ga vsebujejo, ustrezno označiti, ko se dajo na trg.
Dichlofluanid is approved as an active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 21, subject to the specifications and conditions set out in the Annex.
Diklofluanid se odobri kot aktivna snov za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih 21. vrste proizvodov, pri čemer se upoštevajo specifikacije in pogoji iz Priloge.
N-(Dichlorofluoromethylthio)-N′,N′-dimethyl-N-phenylsulfamide
N-[(diklorofluorometiltio]-N′,N′-dimetil-N-fenilsulfamid
EC No: 214-118-7
Št.
CAS No: 1085-98-9
ES: 214-118-7
31 December 2025
96 % masnega %
The product assessment shall pay particular attention to the exposures, the risks and the efficacy linked to any uses covered by an application for authorisation, but not addressed in the Union-level risk assessment of the active substance.
1. november 2018
In the event that products containing dichlofluanid are subsequently authorised for use by non-professional users, persons making products available on the market for non-professional users shall ensure that the products are supplied with appropriate gloves.
31. december 2025
The authorisations of biocidal products are subject to the following conditions:
Pri oceni proizvoda se posebna pozornost nameni vidikom izpostavljenosti, tveganja in učinkovitosti, povezanim s katero koli uporabo, zajeto v vlogi za izdajo dovoljenja, ki pa ni bila obravnavana v oceni tveganja aktivne snovi na ravni Unije.
Products containing dichlofluanid shall not be authorised or used to control the growth and settlement of fouling organisms on freshwater going vessels.
Kadar se proizvodi, ki vsebujejo diklofluanid, naknadno dovolijo za uporabo s strani nepoklicnih uporabnikov, osebe, ki dajejo proizvode na trg za nepoklicne uporabnike, zagotovijo, da so proizvodom priložene ustrezne rokavice.
Where exposure cannot be reduced to an acceptable level by other means, products shall be used with appropriate personal protective equipment.
Proizvodi, ki vsebujejo diklofluanid, se ne odobrijo ali uporabljajo za preprečevanje rasti in naselitve neželenih organizmov na sladkovodnih plovilih.
Labels and, where provided, safety data sheets of products authorised shall indicate that application, maintenance and repair activities shall be conducted within a contained area, on an impermeable hard standing with bunding or on soil covered with an impermeable material to prevent losses and minimise emissions to the environment, and that any losses or waste containing dichlofluanid shall be collected for reuse or disposal.
Če izpostavljenosti ni mogoče zmanjšati na sprejemljivo raven na drugačen način, se proizvodi uporabljajo z ustrezno osebno varovalno opremo.
For products that may lead to residues in food or feed, the need to set new or to amend existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 470/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] or Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] shall be verified, and any appropriate risk mitigation measures shall be taken to ensure that the applicable MRLs are not exceeded.
Na oznakah in po potrebi v navodilih za uporabo se navede, da je treba otrokom preprečiti dostop, dokler tretirane površine niso suhe.
The placing on the market of treated articles is subject to the following condition:
Na oznakah in po potrebi na varnostnih listih dovoljenih proizvodov se navede, da uporaba, vzdrževanje in popravila potekajo v zaprtem prostoru, na neprepustni trdni podlagi z ogrado ali na tleh, prekritih z neprepustnim materialom, za preprečevanje izgube in zmanjšanje emisij v okolje, ter da se vse izgube ali odpadki, ki vsebujejo diklofluanid, zbirajo za ponovno uporabo ali odstranitev.
The person responsible for the placing on the market of a treated article treated with or incorporating dichlofluanid shall ensure that the label of that treated article provides the information listed in the second subparagraph of Article 58(3) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Za proizvode, ki lahko povzročajo ostanke v živilih ali krmi, se preveri, ali bi bilo treba določiti nove ali spremeniti obstoječe mejne vrednosti ostankov (MRL) v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 470/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] ali Uredbo (ES) št. 396/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], in sprejmejo se vsi ustrezni ukrepi za zmanjšanje tveganja, da se veljavne MRL ne presežejo.
The active substance in the product placed on the market can be of equal or different purity if it has been proven to be technically equivalent to the evaluated active substance.
Oseba, odgovorna za dajanje na trg tretiranega izdelka, ki je tretiran s diklofluanidom ali ga vsebuje, zagotovi, da so na oznaki navedenega tretiranega izdelka navedene informacije iz drugega pododstavka člena 58(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/797
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/797
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/803
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/803
amending Regulation (EEC) No 316/91 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 316/91 o uvrstitvi določenega blaga v kombinirano nomenklaturo
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code [1], and in particular Articles 57(4) and 58(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. oktobra 2013 o carinskem zakoniku Unije [1] ter zlasti člena 57(4) in 58(2) Uredbe,
In order to ensure uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature annexed to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 [2], it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the classification of certain goods.
Da bi se zagotovila enotna uporaba kombinirane nomenklature, priložene k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 [2], je treba sprejeti ukrepe v zvezi z uvrstitvijo določenega blaga.
Item 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 316/91 [3] classified a white pasty substance known as ‘creamed coconut’ which is generally intended for use in the kitchen in the preparation of sauces and other foodstuff and manufactured by fine grinding of coconut pulp and pasteurized, under heading 2008 of the Combined Nomenclature as otherwise prepared nuts, not elsewhere specified or included.
Točka 2 Priloge k Uredbi Komisije (EGS) št. 316/91 [3] je uvrščena kot bela testena masa, znana kot „creamed coconut“, ki je na splošno namenjena uporabi pri kuhanju za pripravo omak in drugih živil ter pridobljena s finim mletjem kokosove sredice in pasteriziranjem, pod tarifno številko 2008 kombinirane nomenklature kot drugače pripravljeni oreški, ki niso navedeni ali zajeti na drugem mestu.
Classification of the product under heading 0801 of the Combined Nomenclature was excluded as pasteurisation was not permitted in Chapter 8.
Uvrstitev tega proizvoda pod tarifno številko 0801 kombinirane nomenklature je bila izključena, ker pasterizacija v poglavju 8 ni bila dovoljena.
The Combined Nomenclature, established by Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87, is based on the international Harmonized Commodity System (‘Harmonized System’), drawn up by the Customs Cooperation Council (now the World Customs Organisation), adopted by the International Convention concluded in Brussels on 14 June 1983, and approved on behalf of the Union by Council Decision 87/369/EEC [4].
Kombinirana nomenklatura, določena z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2658/87, temelji na mednarodnem harmoniziranem sistemu poimenovanj (v nadaljnjem besedilu: harmonizirani sistem), ki ga je pripravil Svet za carinsko sodelovanje (zdaj Svetovna carinska organizacija), sprejet pa je bil z mednarodno konvencijo, sklenjeno v Bruslju 14. junija 1983, ter odobren v imenu Unije s Sklepom Sveta 87/369/EGS [4].
It permits a moderate heat treatment for additional preservation or stabilisation of dried nuts of that Chapter.
Pojasnjevalne opombe kombinirane nomenklature Evropske unije [5] k poglavju 8 so na ravni Unije razjasnile, da je pasterizacija med drugim dopustna za posušeno sadje in oreške iz navedenega poglavja.
According to the historical documents from the Harmonized System, the term ‘pasteurisation’ originally proposed in the text of that note was in the end replaced by the more general expression ‘moderate heat treatment’.
Zato je primerno, da se iz preglednice iz Priloge k Uredbi (EGS) št. 316/91 črta točka 2, da se preprečijo morebitne razlike v tarifni uvrstitvi proizvodov iz posušenega kokosovega oreha, kot je „creamed coconut“, ki je bil zmerno toplotno obdelan, da se zagotovi enotna uporaba kombinirane nomenklature v Uniji.
The Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union [5] to Chapter 8 clarified at Union level that pasteurisation is, inter alia, admissible for dried fruits and nuts of that Chapter.
Zato bi bilo treba Uredbo (EGS) št. 316/91 ustrezno spremeniti.
As a consequence, it is appropriate to delete item 2 from the table set out in the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 316/91, in order to avoid potential divergences in tariff classification of desiccated coconut products such as creamed coconut which received a moderate heat treatment and to ensure the uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature within the Union.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za carinski zakonik –
Regulation (EEC) No 316/91 should therefore be amended accordingly.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Vrstica, ki ustreza točki 2 v preglednici iz Priloge k Uredbi (EGS) št. 316/91, se črta.
The row corresponding to item 2 in the table set out in the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 316/91 is deleted.
Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 8. maja 2017
Done at Brussels, 8 May 2017.
V imenu predsednika
On behalf of the President,
Generalni direktorat za obdavčenje in carinsko unijo
Director-General
UL L 269, 10.10.2013, str. 1.
Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 z dne 23. julija 1987 o tarifni in statistični nomenklaturi ter skupni carinski tarifi (UL L 256, 7.9.1987, str. 1).
OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1.
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 316/91 z dne 7. februarja 1991 o uvrstitvi določenega blaga v kombinirano nomenklaturo (UL L 37, 9.2.1991, str. 25).
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).
Sklep Sveta 87/369/EGS z dne 7. aprila 1987 o sprejetju Mednarodne konvencije o harmoniziranem sistemu poimenovanj in šifrskih oznak blaga in Protokola o spremembah Konvencije (UL L 198, 20.7.1987, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 316/91 of 7 February 1991 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ L 37, 9.2.1991, p. 25).
UL C 214, 30.6.2015, str. 4.
Council Decision 87/369/EEC of 7 April 1987 concerning the conclusion of the International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System and of the Protocol of Amendment thereto (OJ L 198, 20.7.1987, p. 1).
Opomba 3(a) k poglavju 8 je bila uvedena v harmonizirani sistem leta 1992.
OJ C 214, 30.6.2015, p. 4.
Dovoljuje zmerno toplotno obdelavo za dodatno konzerviranje ali stabiliziranje posušenih oreškov iz navedenega poglavja.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/804
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/804
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (other than stainless steel), of circular cross-section, of an external diameter exceeding 406,4 mm, originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz železa (razen iz litega železa) ali jekla (razen iz nerjavnega jekla) s krožnim prečnim prerezom in zunanjim premerom več kot 406,4 mm s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9(4) Uredbe,
The European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated on 13 February 2016 an investigation following a complaint lodged on 4 January 2016 by the Defence Committee of the seamless steel tubes industry of the European Union (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of the like product.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 13. februarja 2016 začela preiskavo na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 4. januarja 2016 vložil Odbor za zaščito industrije brezšivnih jeklenih cevi Evropske unije („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
The complaint contained evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an investigation.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu navedenega izdelka in znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za utemeljitev začetka preiskave.
It imposed on 12 November 2016 a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (other than stainless steel), of circular cross-section, of an external diameter exceeding 406,4 mm, originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’, ‘China’ or ‘the country concerned’) by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1977 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’).
Komisija je 12. novembra 2016 z Uredbo (EU) 2016/1977 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz železa (razen iz litega železa) ali jekla (razen iz nerjavnega jekla) s krožnim prečnim prerezom in zunanjim premerom več kot 406,4 mm s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“, „Kitajska“ ali „zadevna država“).
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which a provisional anti-dumping duty was imposed (‘the provisional disclosure’), Union producers, Chinese exporting producers, and an association of Chinese exporting producers made written submissions.
Po razkritju ključnih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila uvedena začasna protidampinška dajatev („začasno razkritje“), so proizvajalci Unije, kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki in združenje kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov predložili pisna stališča.
The Commission considered the comments submitted by the interested parties and, where appropriate, modified the provisional findings accordingly.
Komisija je obravnavala pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, in po potrebi ustrezno spremenila začasne ugotovitve.
The Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intends to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes (‘the definitive disclosure’).
Komisija je vse strani obvestila o ključnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih namerava uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi („dokončno razkritje“).
In recitals (7) to (9) of the provisional Regulation, the Commission invited comments concerning the representativity of one of the sampled Union producers.
Komisija je v uvodnih izjavah 7 do 9 začasne uredbe pozvala k predložitvi pripomb glede reprezentativnosti enega od vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
One Chinese exporting producer argued that the one Union producer should be removed from the sample as its data would distort the findings for the whole industry.
Eden od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je navedel, da bi bilo treba tega proizvajalca Unije izključiti iz vzorca, ker naj bi njegovi podatki popačili ugotovitve za celotno industrijo.
A second Chinese exporting producer underlined that Vallourec was the largest company in the sample, thus it was unclear whether the sample was representative of the Union industry.
Drug kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je poudaril, da je družba Vallourec največja družba v vzorcu in da zato ni jasno, ali je vzorec reprezentativen za industrijo Unije.
The complainant argued that the Chinese producers are increasingly competing also in tailor-made and high-end products.
Pritožnik je trdil, da so kitajski proizvajalci čedalje konkurenčnejši tudi pri izdelkih po meri in visokokakovostnih izdelkih.
It also pointed out that the oil and gas products are mainly exported outside the Union, so this difference in product ranges has only a small role in the Union market.
Poudaril je tudi, da se izdelki za segment nafte in plina izvažajo predvsem v države zunaj Unije, tako da naj bi ta razlika v asortimentih izdelkov imela le majhen pomen na trgu Unije.
The Commission requested additional data and carried out a further verification visit at the premises of the Union producer.
Komisija je zahtevala dodatne podatke in izvedla dodatni preveritveni obisk v prostorih proizvajalca Unije.
The findings showed that the Union producer produces a wider range of product types than the other sampled Union producers, but this wide product range, including pipes for power generation, oil and gas and construction, was within the product scope.
Ugotovila je, da proizvajalec Unije proizvaja širši asortiment vrst izdelka kot drugi vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, vendar je ta širok asortiment izdelkov, vključno s cevmi za proizvodnjo električne energije, za nafto in plin ter gradbeništvo, zajet v obsegu izdelka.
Both the Union producers and the Chinese producers are involved in both the commodity products and the high-end products.
Proizvajalci Unije in kitajski proizvajalci se ukvarjajo s proizvodnjo tako primarnih kot visokokakovostnih izdelkov.
The specific Union producer represents a large part of the Union production.
Zadevni proizvajalec Unije predstavlja velik del proizvodnje Unije.
The Commission therefore concluded that the Union producer is part of the Union industry, and that there are no grounds to exclude it from the sample.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da je proizvajalec Unije del industrije Unije in da ni razlogov za njegovo izključitev iz vzorca.
Any unwarranted impact of this company's specific situation in the injury picture was addressed by means of cost adjustments and weighting, as explained in recitals (81), (84) and (146).
Vsak neupravičen učinek posebnega položaja te družbe v sliki škode je bil obravnavan s prilagoditvami stroškov in uteževanjem, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 81, 84 in 146.
The association of Chinese exporting producers reiterated its earlier comments against the initiation of the investigation, among which its opposition to the method of establishing a preliminary sample before initiation.
Združenje kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je ponovno izrazilo svoje prejšnje pripombe glede začetka preiskave, med katerimi je bilo tudi nasprotovanje metodi določitve predhodnega vzorca pred začetkom preiskave.
It also alleged that the complaint was unsubstantiated, of poor quality and based on assumptions, the product scope was too broad and groups together too different products, and there were too many confidential elements.
Trdilo je tudi, da je bila pritožba neutemeljena, slabe kakovosti in temelječa na predpostavkah, da je bil obseg izdelka preširok in da je združeval preveč različne izdelke ter da je bilo vključenih preveč zaupnih elementov.
The Commission recalled that the preliminary selection of sampled companies was open for comments by the interested parties.
Komisija je opozorila, da so imele zainteresirane strani možnost podati pripombe na predhodno izbiro vzorčenih družb.
The comments of the Chinese association were received only after the deadline, by which stage the sample had already been confirmed.
Pripombe kitajskega združenja je prejela šele po roku, ko je bil vzorec že potrjen.
It was therefore rejected.
Zato so bile zavrnjene.
As regards the other claims, the Commission pointed out that at the stage of the complaint, it was not necessary to already have the same evidence of dumping and injury that would be necessary for the imposition of measures.
V zvezi z drugimi trditvami je Komisija poudarila, da v fazi pritožbe ni treba imeti enakih dokazov o dampingu in škodi, kot bi bili potrebni za uvedbo ukrepov.
The claims concerning confidential annexes of the complaint were examined and the justification for the confidentiality was confirmed.
Trditve o zaupnih prilogah k pritožbi so bile proučene, pri čemer je bila utemeljitev za zaupnost potrjena.
In any case, the Chinese association received a detailed reply to its claims against the initiation.
V vsakem primeru je kitajsko združenje prejelo podroben odgovor na svoje trditve zoper začetek preiskave.
In the absence of other comments concerning the method of sampling, the provisional findings set out in recitals (10) to (13) of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z metodo vzorčenja ni bilo drugih pripomb, so bile začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 10 do 13 začasne uredbe potrjene.
As mentioned in recital (14) of the provisional Regulation, three exporting producers which were not included in the sample requested that an individual margin of dumping be established pursuant to Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 14 začasne uredbe, so trije proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, zahtevali določitev individualne stopnje dampinga v skladu s členom 17(3) osnovne uredbe.
However, following the publication of the provisional measures, two of them decided to withdraw their request for an individual examination.
Vendar sta se po objavi začasnih ukrepov dva od njih odločila, da svoj zahtevek za individualno preiskavo umakneta.
The sole exporting producer that confirmed its initial request for an individual examination was Zhejiang Gross Seamless Steel Tube Co., Ltd
Edini proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je potrdil svoj prvotni zahtevek za individualno preiskavo, je bila družba Zhejiang Gross Seamless Steel Tube Co., Ltd.
No claim forms for market economy treatment were submitted by any of the exporting producers during the investigation.
Nobeden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov med preiskavo ni predložil obrazca zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo.
The findings of recital (15) of the provisional Regulation were therefore confirmed.
Ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 15 začasne uredbe so bile zato potrjene.