natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These issues have been identified in a number of analyses, in particular from the Supreme Court and the National Council for the Judiciary as raising concerns, including questions of compliance with the Constitution [44].
Glede tega Komisija ugotavlja, da se je predsednik republike 24. julija 2017 odločil, da zakon o vrhovnem sodišču in zakon o nacionalnem sodnem svetu vrne v obravnavo Sejmu.
However, as explained above an independent and legitimate constitutional review is currently not possible.4.
Spoštovanje načela pravne države ni le predpogoj za varstvo vseh temeljnih vrednot iz člena 2 PEU.
FINDING OF A SYSTEMIC THREAT TO THE RULE OF LAW
Je tudi predpogoj za ohranjanje vseh pravic in obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Pogodb, ter vzpostavitev vzajemnega zaupanja državljanov, podjetij in nacionalnih organov v pravne sisteme vseh drugih držav članic.
For the reasons set out above, the Commission considers that the situation of a systemic threat to the rule of law in Poland as presented in its Recommendations of 27 July 2016 and 21 December 2016 has seriously deteriorated.
Nekateri vidiki novih zakonov vzbujajo tudi pomisleke glede njihove združljivosti s pravom EU, zato se je Komisija odločila, da poleg tega priporočila v zvezi s pravno državo proti Poljski uvede postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, ko bo objavljen zakon o organizaciji splošnih sodišč ali če bo podpisan in objavljen zakon o vrhovnem sodišču.
In particular:
Komisija poudarja, da je ustrezno delovanje pravne države bistveno tudi za nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga, ker morajo gospodarski subjekti vedeti, da bodo pred zakonom enako obravnavani.
The unlawful appointment of the President of the Constitutional Tribunal, the admission of the three judges nominated by the 8th term of the Sejm without a valid legal basis, the fact that one of these judges has been appointed as Vice-President of the Tribunal, the fact that the three judges that were lawfully nominated in October 2015 by the previous legislature have not been able to take up their function of judge in the Tribunal, as well as the subsequent developments within the Tribunal described above have de facto led to a complete recomposition of the Tribunal outside the normal constitutional process for the appointment of judges.
Tega ni mogoče zagotoviti brez neodvisnega sodstva v vsaki državi članici.
For this reason, the Commission considers that the independence and legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal are seriously undermined and, consequently, the constitutionality of Polish laws can no longer be effectively guaranteed.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so številni akterji na evropski in mednarodni ravni izrazili globoko zaskrbljenost glede reforme poljskega sodnega sistema: predstavniki sodstva po vsej Evropi, vključno z Mrežo predsednikov vrhovnih sodišč Evropske unije in Evropsko mrežo sodnih svetov, Beneško komisijo, komisarjem Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice, Odborom Združenih narodov za človekove pravice ter številnimi organizacijami civilne družbe, kot sta Amnesty International ter Mreža za človekove pravice in demokracijo.
The judgments rendered by the Tribunal under these circumstances can no longer be considered as providing an effective constitutional review.
Evropski parlament je prav tako izrazil pomisleke, tudi v dveh resolucijah v podporo stališčem Komisije.
The law on the National School of Judiciary already in force, and the law on the National Council for the Judiciary, the law on the Ordinary Courts Organisation and the law on the Supreme Court should they enter into force, structurally undermine the independence of the judiciary in Poland and would have an immediate and concrete impact on the independent functioning of the judiciary as a whole.
PRIPOROČENO UKREPANJE
Given that the independence of the judiciary is a key component of the rule of law, these new laws increase significantly the systemic threat to rule of law as identified in the previous Recommendations.
Komisija priporoča, da poljski organi sprejmejo nujne ustrezne ukrepe za odpravljanje te sistemske nevarnosti za načelo pravne države.
In particular, the dismissal of Supreme Court judges, their possible reappointment and other measures contained in the law on the Supreme Court would very seriously aggravate the systemic threat to the rule of law.
Komisija zlasti priporoča, da poljski organi sprejmejo naslednje ukrepe:
The new laws raise serious concerns as regards their compatibility with the Polish Constitution as underlined by a number of statements, in particular from the Supreme Court, the National Council for the Judiciary, the Polish Ombudsman, the Bar Association and associations of judges and lawyers, and other relevant stakeholders [45].
ponovno vzpostavijo neodvisnost in zakonitost ustavnega sodišča kot varuha poljske ustave, tako da zagotovijo, da so sodniki, predsednik in podpredsednik ustavnega sodišča zakonito izvoljeni in imenovani, ter v celoti izvršijo sodbi ustavnega sodišča z dne 3. in 9. decembra 2015, ki zahtevata, da trije sodniki, ki jih je oktobra 2015 zakonito imenovala prejšnja sestava Sejma, nastopijo svojo funkcijo ustavnih sodnikov in da trije sodniki, ki jih je imenovala nova sestava Sejma brez ustrezne pravne podlage, ne razsojajo več, ne da bi bili zakonito imenovani [47];
However, as explained above an effective constitutional review of these laws is no longer possible.
objavijo in v celoti izvršijo sodbe ustavnega sodišča z dne 9. marca 2016, 11. avgusta 2016 in 7. novembra 2016;
Finally, actions and public statements against judges and courts in Poland made by the Polish Government and by members of Parliament from the ruling majority have damaged the trust in the justice system as a whole.
zagotovijo, da zakon o nacionalnem sodnem svetu, zakon o organizaciji splošnih sodišč in zakon o vrhovnem sodišču ne začnejo veljati ter da se zakon o nacionalni šoli za sodnike umakne ali spremeni za zagotovitev skladnosti z ustavo in evropskimi standardi glede neodvisnosti sodstva;
The Commission underlines the principle of loyal cooperation between state organs which is, as highlighted in the opinions of the Venice Commission, a constitutional precondition in a democratic state governed by the rule of law.
se vzdržijo ukrepov, ki posegajo v mandat vrhovnih sodnikov in njihovo funkcijo;
The Commission recalls that where a constitutional justice system has been established, its effectiveness is a key component of the rule of law.
zagotovijo, da je kakršna koli sodna reforma v podporo pravni državi in skladna s pravom EU in evropskimi standardi o neodvisnosti sodstva ter pripravljena v tesnem sodelovanju s sodstvom in vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi;
The Commission also underlines that whatever the model of the justice system chosen, the independence of the judiciary must be safeguarded as a matter of EU law.
se vzdržijo ukrepov in javnih izjav, ki bi lahko nadalje ogrozili zakonitost ustavnega sodišča, vrhovnih sodišč, splošnih sodišč, sodnikov, individualno ali kolektivno, ali sodstva kot celote.
It is up to the Member States to organise their justice systems, including whether or not to establish a Council for the Judiciary the role of which is to safeguard judicial independence.
Komisija poudarja, da je lojalno sodelovanje, ki je potrebno med različnimi državnimi institucijami v zadevah, povezanih z načelom pravne države, bistvenega pomena za iskanje rešitve v trenutnih razmerah.
However, where such a Council has been established by a Member State, as it is the case in Poland where the Polish Constitution has entrusted explicitly the National Council for the Judiciary with the task of safeguarding judicial independence, the independence of such Council must be guaranteed in line with European standards.
Prav tako spodbuja poljske organe, naj pridobijo mnenje Beneške komisije o zakonu o nacionalni šoli za sodnike, zakonu o nacionalnem sodnem svetu, zakonu o organizaciji splošnih sodišč in zakonu o vrhovnem sodišču ter o vseh morebitnih novih zakonodajnih predlogih, namenjenih reformi sodnega sistema na Poljskem.
It is with great concern that the Commission observes that following the entry into force of the new laws referred to above, the Polish judicial system would no longer be compatible with the European standards in this regard.
Komisija poljske organe poziva, naj izkoristijo priložnost zaradi odločitve poljskega predsednika, da zakon o nacionalnem sodnem svetu in zakon o vrhovnem sodišču vrne v obravnavo Sejmu, in zagotovijo, da bodo kakršne koli reforme sodstva na Poljskem upoštevale pomisleke, izražene v tem priporočilu.
In that respect, the Commission takes note of the decision of the President of the Republic of 24 July 2017 to refer back to the Sejm the law on the Supreme Court and the law on the National Council for the Judiciary.
Komisija tudi opozarja, da priporočila, sprejeta znotraj okvira za krepitev pravne države, ne preprečujejo neposredne uporabe člena 7 PEU, če bi nenadno poslabšanje stanja v državi članici zahtevalo močnejši odziv EU [48].58.
Respect for the rule of law is not only a prerequisite for the protection of all the fundamental values listed in Article 2 TEU.
Komisija Poljske organe zlasti poziva, naj ne sprejmejo nobenih ukrepov za razrešitev ali prisilno upokojitev vrhovnih sodnikov, saj bi taki ukrepi zelo resno povečali sistemsko nevarnost za pravno državo.
It is also a prerequisite for upholding all rights and obligations deriving from the Treaties and for establishing mutual trust of citizens, businesses and national authorities in the legal systems of all other Member States.
Če bi poljski organi sprejeli kakršen koli tak ukrep, je Komisija pripravljena nemudoma uporabiti člen 7(1) PEU.
Certain aspects of the new laws also raise concerns as regards their compatibility with EU law and for this reason the Commission has decided, in addition to the present Rule of Law Recommendation, to launch infringement procedures against Poland when the law on the Ordinary Courts Organisation will be published or should the law on the Supreme Court be signed and published.
Na podlagi tega priporočila je Komisija še naprej pripravljena na konstruktiven dialog s poljsko vlado.
The Commission underlines that the proper functioning of the rule of law is also essential for the seamless operation of the Internal Market because economic operators must know that they will be treated equally under the law.
V Bruslju, 26. julija 2017
This cannot be assured without an independent judiciary in each Member State.
Za Komisijo
For this reason, the Council underlined the importance for the Polish authorities to address the serious concerns related to the rule of law in its country-specific recommendations addressed to Poland in the context of the 2017 European Semester.
Prvi podpredsednik
The country-specific recommendations have been generally endorsed by the European Council on 23 June 2017 and adopted by the Economic and Financial Affairs Council on 11 July 2017 [46].51.
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2016/1374 z dne 27. julija 2016 v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem (UL L 217, 12.8.2016, str. 53).
The Commission notes that a wide range of actors at European and international level have expressed their deep concern about the reform of the Polish justice system: representatives of the judiciary across Europe, including the Network of Presidents of the Supreme Judicial Courts of the European Union and the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, the Venice Commission, the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, the United Nations Human Rights Committee as well as numerous civil society organisations such as Amnesty International and the Human Rights and Democracy Network.
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2017/146 z dne 21. decembra 2016 v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem o dopolnitvi Priporočila (EU) 2016/1374 (UL L 22, 27.1.2017, str. 65).
The European Parliament has also expressed its concerns, including in two resolutions supporting the Commission's views.
Sporočilo „Novi okvir EU za krepitev načela pravne države“, COM(2014) 158 final.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Glej oddelek 2 Priloge I h COM(2014) 158 final.
The Commission recommends that the Polish authorities take appropriate action to address this systemic threat to the rule of law as a matter of urgency.
Uvodna izjava 14 Priporočila Sveta z dne 11. julija 2017 v zvezi z nacionalnim programom reform Poljske za leto 2017 in mnenje Sveta o konvergenčnem programu Poljske za leto 2017 (UL C 261, 9.8.2017, str. 88).
In particular the Commission recommends that the Polish authorities take the following actions:
Glej oddelka 5.3 in 5.4 priporočila.
restore the independence and legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal as guarantor of the Polish Constitution by ensuring that its judges, its President and its Vice-President are lawfully elected and appointed and by implementing fully the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 3 and 9 December 2015 which require that the three judges that were lawfully nominated in October 2015 by the previous legislature can take up their function of judge in the Constitutional Tribunal, and that the three judges nominated by the new legislature without a valid legal basis no longer adjudicate without being validly elected [47];
V skladu s členom 188 ustave je ustavno sodišče pristojno za razsojanje o skladnosti zakonov in mednarodnih sporazumov z ustavo, o skladnosti zakonov z ratificiranimi mednarodnimi sporazumi, za ratifikacijo katerih je bilo potrebno predhodno soglasje, odobreno z zakonom, o skladnosti pravnih predpisov, ki jih izdajo osrednji državni organi, z ustavo, ratificiranimi mednarodnimi sporazumi in zakoni, o skladnosti ciljev ali dejavnosti političnih strank z ustavo in o pritožbah v zvezi s kršitvami ustave.
publish and implement fully the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 9 March 2016, 11 August 2016 and 7 November 2016;
V skladu s členom 189 ustave ustavno sodišče tudi rešuje spore o pooblastilih med osrednjimi ustavnimi državnimi organi.
ensure that the law on the National Council for the Judiciary, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation and the law on the Supreme Court do not enter into force and that the law on the National School of Judiciary is withdrawn or amended in order to ensure its compliance with the Constitution and European standards on judicial independence;
Zakon o spremembi zakona o javni upravi in nekaterih drugih zakonov z dne 30. decembra 2015, objavljen v Uradnem listu 8. januarja 2016, točka 34.
refrain from any measure interfering with the tenure of the Supreme Court judges and their function;
Zakon o spremembi zakona o policiji in nekaterih drugih zakonov z dne 15. januarja 2016, objavljen v Uradnem listu 4. februarja 2016, točka 147.
ensure that any justice reform upholds the rule of law and complies with EU law and the European standards on judicial independence and is prepared in close cooperation with the judiciary and all interested parties;
Zakon o javnem tožilstvu z dne 28. januarja 2016, objavljen v Uradnem listu 15. februarja 2016, točka 177; zakon o izvajanju zakona o javnem tožilstvu z dne 28. januarja 2016, objavljen v Uradnem listu 15. februarja 2016, točka 178.
refrain from actions and public statements which could undermine further the legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal, the Supreme Courts, the ordinary courts, the judges, individually or collectively, or the judiciary as a whole.
Zakon o varuhu človekovih pravic in spremembi nekaterih drugih zakonov z dne 18. marca 2016.
The Commission underlines that the loyal cooperation which is required amongst the different state institutions in rule of law related matters is essential in order to find a solution in the present situation.
Predsednik republike ga je podpisal 4. maja 2016.
The Commission also encourages the Polish authorities to seek the views of the Venice Commission on the law on the National School of Judiciary, the law on the National Council for the Judiciary, the law on the Ordinary Courts Organisation and the law on the Supreme Court as well as on any new legislative proposal aiming to reform the justice system in Poland.
Zakon o državnem svetu za medije z dne 22. junija 2016.
The Commission invites the Polish Government to solve the problems identified in this Recommendation within 1 month of receipt of this Recommendation, and to inform the Commission of the steps taken to that effect.
Predsednik republike ga je podpisal 27. junija 2016.
The Commission invites the Polish authorities to use the opportunity of the Polish President's decision to refer back to the Sejm the law on the National Council for the Judiciary and the law on the Supreme Court to ensure that any reforms of the judiciary in Poland take account of the concerns expressed in this Recommendation.
Zakon o boju proti terorizmu z dne 10. junija 2016.
The Commission also recalls that Recommendations adopted under the rule of Law Framework do not prevent Article 7 TEU being activated directly, should a sudden deterioration in a Member State require a stronger reaction from the EU [48].58.
Predsednik republike ga je podpisal 22. junija 2016.
The Commission asks in particular the Polish authorities not to take any measure to dismiss or force the retirement of the Supreme Courts judges as these measures will very seriously aggravate the systemic threat to the rule of law.
Pravosodne svetovalce, čeprav so jim zaupane dolžnosti sodnika, neposredno imenuje minister za pravosodje, ob čim manjši udeležbi nacionalnega sodnega sveta, saj ima ta na voljo samo 30 dni, da vloži ugovor.
Should the Polish authorities take any measure of this kind, the Commission stands ready to immediately activate Article 7(1) TEU.
Neodvisnost sodnika bi morala biti določena v ustavi, na zakonodajni ravni pa bi morala biti zagotovljena konkretnejša pravila (Priporočilo CM/Rec(2010)12 Odbora ministrov Sveta Evrope o neodvisnosti, učinkovitosti in odgovornosti sodnikov, sprejeto 17. novembra 2010 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: priporočilo Sveta Evrope iz leta 2010), točka 7).
On the basis of this Recommendation, the Commission continues to be ready to pursue a constructive dialogue with the Polish Government.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da sta vrhovno sodišče in nacionalni sodni svet v svojih mnenjih podvomila o ustavnosti teh zakonov.
Done at Brussels, 26 July 2017.
Mnenje vrhovnega sodišča z dne 3. februarja 2017; mnenje nacionalnega sodnega sveta z dne 10. februarja 2017.
For the Commission
ESČP, zadeva Henryk Urban in Ryszard Urban proti Poljski, 23614/08, 28. februar 2011; ESČP, zadeva Mirosław Garlicki proti Poljski, 36921/07, 14. september 2011; ESČP, zadeva Pohoska proti Poljski, 33530/06 10. april 2012.
First Vice-President
Člen 1(7) zakona o organizaciji splošnih sodišč.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/1374 of 27 July 2016 regarding the rule of law in Poland (OJ L 217, 12.8.2016, p. 53).
Člen 186(1) poljske ustave: „Nacionalni sodni svet varuje neodvisnost sodišč in sodnikov“.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/146 of 21 December 2016 regarding the rule of law in Poland complementary to Recommendation (EU) 2016/1374 (OJ L 22, 27.1.2017, p. 65).
ESČP, zadeva Ramos Nunes de Carvalho E Sá proti Portugalski, 55391/13, 57728/13 in 74041/13, 21. junij 2016, točka 77.
Communication ‘A new EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law’, COM(2014) 158 final.
Točka 27; glej tudi Akcijski načrt Sveta Evrope za krepitev neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti sodstva, sprejet 13. aprila 2016 (CM(2016) 36 final), točka C(ii).
See COM(2014) 158 final, Section 2, Annex I.
Mnenje CCJE št. 10 o sodnem svetu v službi družbe, točka 27; različna mnenja Beneške komisije in standardi ENCJ v poročilu „Sodni sveti“ za obdobje 2010–2011, točka 2.3.
Recital 14 of the Council Recommendation of 11 July 2017 on the 2017 National Reform Programme of Poland and delivering a Council opinion on the 2017 Convergence Programme of Poland (OJ C 261, 9.8.2017, p.
Ustava določa, da nacionalni sodni svet sestavljajo člani po uradni dolžnosti (prvi predsednik vrhovnega sodišča, minister za pravosodje, predsednik vrhovnega upravnega sodišča in oseba, ki jo imenuje predsednik) in izvoljeni člani.
88).
Izvoljeni člani vključujejo štiri poslance, „ki jih izbere Sejm“, dva senatorja, „ki jih izbere senat“, in 15 sodnikov ( „ki se izberejo med“ tistimi na splošnih, upravnih in vojaških sodiščih ter vrhovnem sodišču).
See Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of the Recommendation.
To je v nasprotju s standardi Sveta Evrope: Priporočilo Sveta Evrope iz leta 2010 (točka 26); Akcijski načrt Sveta Evrope za krepitev neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti sodstva, sprejet 13. aprila 2016 (CM(2016) 36 final), točka C.
According to Article 188 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Tribunal is to rule on the conformity of statutes and international agreements to the Constitution, on the conformity of a statute to ratified international agreements whose ratification required prior consent granted by statute, on the conformity of legal provisions issued by central State organs to the Constitution, ratified international agreements and statutes, on the conformity to the constitution of the purposes or activities of political parties, and on complaints concerning constitutional infringements.
ESČP, zadevi Morice proti Franciji, 29369/10, 23. april 2015, točka 78; Ciper proti Turčiji, 25781/94, 10. maj 2001, točka 233.
According to Article 189 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Tribunal shall also settle disputes over authority between central constitutional organs of the State.
Priporočilo Sveta Evrope iz leta 2010, točka 49.
Law of 30 December 2015 amending the law on Civil Service and certain other acts, published in Official Journal on 8 January 2016, item 34.
V skladu z zakonom minister za pravosodje odloči, ali bo mandat sodnika podaljšan ali ne, „pri čemer upošteva racionalno uporabo skupnega osebja sodišč in potrebe, ki izhajajo iz delovne obremenitve posameznih sodišč“ (glej člen 1(26)(b) zakona).
Law of 15 January 2016 amending the law on Police and other laws, published in Official Journal on 4 February 2016, item 147.
Zadeva C-53/03, Syfait in drugi, 31. maj 2005, točka 31; zadeva C-103/97, Köllensperger in Atzwanger, 4. februar 1999, točka 20.
Law of 28 January 2016 on the Prosecutor's Office, published in Official Journal on 15 February 2016, item 177; law of 28 January 2016 — Regulations implementing the Act — law on the Prosecutor's Office, published in Official Journal on 15 February 2016, item 178.
Mnenje vrhovnega sodišča z dne 28. aprila 2017.
Law of 18 March 2016 on the Ombudsman and amending certain other laws.
V skladu s členom 89(1) imajo razrešeni in upokojeni sodniki pravico do prejemka v višini plačila, ki ga je sodnik prejel na zadnjem položaju na vrhovnem sodišču, dokler ne dosežejo starosti 65 let.
The law was signed by the President of the Republic on 4 May 2016.
Člen 89(2) zakona o vrhovnem sodišču določa, da sodniki, razrešeni s položaja na vrhovnem sodišču, ohranijo pravico, da v 14 dneh po upokojitvi pri ministru za pravosodje vložijo prošnjo za premestitev na sodniško mesto na splošnem, vojaškem ali upravnem sodišču.
Law of 22 June 2016 on the National Council of Media.
Minister za pravosodje ima pravico, da tako prošnjo zavrne.
The law was signed by the President of the Republic on 27 June 2016.
Nato v skladu s členom 95 zakona o vrhovnem sodišču minister za pravosodje objavi prosta mesta v posameznih senatih vrhovnega sodišča, nato pa nacionalnemu sodnemu svetu predlaga po enega kandidata po lastni izbiri za vsako objavljeno prosto mesto.
Law of 10 June 2016 on anti-terrorism.
Nacionalni sodni svet oceni vsakega kandidata in predsedniku republike predlaga imenovanje na mesto vrhovnega sodnika.
The law was signed by the President of the Republic on 22 June 2016.
V nekaterih primerih bo lahko nacionalni sodni svet tak predlog predložil samo prek ene od svojih skupščin in s tem potencialno izključil skupščino, ki jo sestavljajo sodniki člani.
The assistant judges, even though they are entrusted with the duties of a judge, are appointed by the Minister of Justice directly with a minimal involvement of the National Council for the Judiciary as it can only raise an objection within 30 days.
Minister za pravosodje lahko dodatno objavi preostala prosta mesta.