natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Subsequently, all parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the additional disclosure.
Naknadno je bil za vse strani določen rok, v katerem so lahko predložile pripombe glede dodatnega razkritja.
In the absence of comments concerning the method of sampling, the provisional findings set out in recitals (7) to (10) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z metodo vzorčenja, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 7 do 10 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of comments concerning the investigation period (‘IP’) and the period considered, the periods established in recital (14) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z obdobjem preiskave („OP“) in obravnavanim obdobjem, se obdobji iz uvodne izjave 14 začasne uredbe potrdita.
As set out in recitals (15) to (16) of the provisional Regulation, the product subject to investigation was defined as ‘certain concrete reinforcement bars and rods, made of iron or non-alloy steel, not further worked than forged, hot-rolled, hot-drawn or hot-extruded, but including those twisted after rolling and also those containing indentations, ribs, grooves or other deformations produced during the rolling process, originating in Belarus and currently falling within CN codes ex72141000, ex72142000, ex72143000, ex72149110, ex72149190, ex72149910, ex72149971, ex72149979 and ex72149995 (‘rebars’ or ‘the product concerned’).
Kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah 15 in 16 začasne uredbe, so izdelek v preiskavi „nekatere armaturne palice s poreklom iz Belorusije, izdelane iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla, kovane, toplo valjane, toplo vlečene ali toplo iztiskane, brez nadaljnje obdelave, vključno s spiralno zvitimi po valjanju in tudi tistimi, ki vsebujejo zareze, rebra, brazde ali druge deformacije, nastale med procesom valjanja, ki so trenutno uvrščene pod oznake KN ex72141000, ex72142000, ex72143000, ex72149110, ex72149190, ex72149910, ex72149971, ex72149979 in ex72149995 (‚armaturne palice‘ ali ‚zadevni izdelek‘).
High fatigue performance iron or steel concrete reinforcing bars and rods are excluded’.
Izključene so vroče valjane armaturne palice iz železa ali jekla z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti.“
Already at provisional stage of the investigation, the exporting producer from Belarus pointed to an alleged inconsistency between the complaint (referring to two CN codes) and the notice of initiation (NoI) (referring to nine CN codes).
Že v začasni fazi preiskave je proizvajalec izvoznik iz Belorusije opozoril na domnevno neskladnost med pritožbo (ki se nanaša na dve oznaki KN) in obvestilom o začetku postopka (ki se nanaša na devet oznak KN).
After explanations given in this regard in the provisional regulation, the Belarussian exporter changed the nature of its claim and requested the inclusion of an additional sentence in the descriptive part of the product concerned in order to make it clear that round bars and other types of bars without indents, ribs or other deformations, which are also covered by the additional seven CN codes, are not included in the product concerned.
Po pojasnilih v zvezi s tem v začasni uredbi je beloruski izvoznik spremenil naravo svojega zahtevka in zaprosil za vključitev dodatnega stavka v opisni del zadevnega izdelka, da bi bilo jasno, da zadevni izdelek ne vključuje palic z okroglim prečnim prerezom in drugih vrst palic brez zarez, reber ali drugih deformacij, ki so tudi zajete v dodatnih sedmih oznakah KN.
On the other hand, contrary to the claim of the Belarusian company, the complainant claimed that round bars and other bars without deformation should be included in the product scope.
Po drugi strani pa je v nasprotju s trditvijo beloruske družbe pritožnik trdil, da bi morale biti palice z okroglim prečnim prerezom in druge palice brez deformacij vključene v obseg izdelka.
After careful examination, the Commission concludes that the descriptive part of definition of the product concerned in the complaint and in the NoI clearly does not encompass round bars and bars without deformation and, therefore, these bars fall outside the product scope.
Po skrbni proučitvi Komisija ugotavlja, da opisni del opredelitve zadevnega izdelka v pritožbi in obvestilu o začetku postopka očitno ne zajema palic z okroglim prečnim prerezom in palic brez deformacij, zato te palice ne spadajo v obseg izdelka.
Furthermore, all the data concerning product concerned collected for the dumping calculations and injury analysis did not include data referring to the round bars or bars without deformation.
Poleg tega vsi podatki v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom, zbrani za izračun dampinga in analizo škode, niso zajemali podatkov v zvezi s palicami z okroglim prečnim prerezom in palicami brez deformacij.
Therefore, the definition of the product scope should make it clear that round bars and bars without deformation are not part of the product concerned.
Zato mora biti iz opredelitve obsega izdelka razvidno, da zadevni izdelek ne vključuje palic z okroglim prečnim prerezom in palic brez deformacij.
Hence, the Commission accepts the changes in the description of the product concerned suggested by the Belarusian exporting producer.
Zato Komisija sprejema spremembe opisa zadevnega izdelka, ki jih je predlagal beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik.
During this assessment, the Commission verified that the CN codes ex72149971 and ex72149979 referred exclusively to round bars and bars without deformation and, therefore, excluded the reference made to them in the definition of the product scope.
Med to oceno je Komisija potrdila, da sta se oznaki KN ex72149971 in ex72149979 nanašali izključno na palice z okroglim prečnim prerezom in palice brez deformacij, zato je iz opredelitve obsega izdelka izključila sklicevanja nanje.
The Commission also noticed that these bars had been incorrectly included in the information set out in recitals (62), (63), (65) and (103) of the provisional Regulation (Union consumption, volume and market share of the imports concerned, prices of imports, and imports from third countries) and therefore this data was revised accordingly.
Komisija je tudi ugotovila, da so bile te palice neupravičeno vključene v informacije iz uvodnih izjav 62, 63, 65 in 103 začasne uredbe (potrošnja v Uniji, obseg in tržni delež zadevnega uvoza, cene uvoza in uvoz iz tretjih držav), zato so bili ti podatki ustrezno popravljeni.
Taking into account the above, the Commission clarifies the definition of the product concerned as followed:
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je Komisija spremenila opredelitev zadevnega izdelka:
‘The product concerned is certain concrete reinforcement bars and rods, made of iron or non-alloy steel, not further worked than forged, hot-rolled, hot-drawn or hot-extruded, whether or not twisted after rolling, containing indentations, ribs, grooves or other deformations produced during the rolling process, originating in Belarus and currently falling within CN codes ex72141000, ex72142000, ex72143000, ex72149110, ex72149190, ex72149910 and ex72149995 (‘the product concerned’).
„Zadevni izdelek so nekatere armaturne palice s poreklom iz Belorusije, izdelane iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla, kovane, toplo valjane, toplo vlečene ali toplo iztiskane, brez nadaljnje obdelave, spiralno zvite po valjanju ali ne, ki vsebujejo zareze, rebra, brazde ali druge deformacije, nastale med procesom valjanja, ki so trenutno uvrščene pod oznake KN ex72141000, ex72142000, ex72143000, ex72149110, ex72149190, ex72149910 in ex72149995 (‚zadevni izdelek‘).
High fatigue performance iron or steel concrete reinforcing bars and rods and other long products, such as round bars are excluded’.
Izključeni so armaturne palice iz železa ali jekla z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti in drugi podolgovati izdelki, kot so palice z okroglim prečnim prerezom.“
In the absence of comments concerning details of dumping calculation, the provisional findings and conclusions set out in recitals (19) to (55) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi s podatki o izračunu dampinga, se začasne ugotovitve in sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 19 do 55 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments concerning the Union industry, the provisional findings and conclusions set out in recitals (56) to (59) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z industrijo Unije, se začasne ugotovitve in sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 56 do 59 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
As mentioned in the recitals (13) and (14), the round bars and bars without deformation are not part of the product concerned.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 13 in 14, zadevni izdelek ne vključuje palic z okroglim prečnim prerezom in palic brez deformacij.
These products are currently falling within CN codes ex72149971 and 72149979.
Ta izdelka trenutno spadata v oznaki KN ex72149971 in 72149979.
The revised information presented in the tables, as set out in recitals (62), (63) and (65) of the provisional Regulation, is as follows:
Popravljene informacije iz preglednic v uvodnih izjavah 62, 63 in 65 začasne uredbe so naslednje:
Index (2012 = 100)
indeks (2012 = 100)
Volume (tonnes)
obseg (v tonah)
Market share on EU consumption (%)
Tržni delež potrošnje v EU (v %)
Prices of imports
Uvozne cene
Average price (in EUR/tonne)
Povprečna cena v EUR/tono
The correction of the figures above did not have any impact on the injury assessment.
Popravek zgornjih številk ni vplival na oceno škode.
Indeed, the trends observed were the same and therefore the Commission's findings in recitals (62) to (66) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ugotovljeni trendi so bili dejansko enaki, zato se ugotovitve Komisije iz uvodnih izjav 62 do 66 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Unreliability of certain injury data of the Union industry as a result of price-fixing
Nezanesljivost nekaterih podatkov industrije Unije o škodi zaradi kartelnega dogovora o cenah
As described in recital (132) of the provisional Regulation, the Belarusian exporting producer and one of the non-sampled Union importers raised the issue of alleged price-fixing among the Union producers, which would have rendered the injury data unreliable.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 132 začasne uredbe, sta beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik in eden od nevzorčenih uvoznikov v Uniji izpostavila vprašanje domnevnega kartelnega dogovora o cenah med proizvajalci v Uniji, zaradi katerega naj bi bili podatki o škodi nezanesljivi.
This claim was further developed by the Belarusian company in its submission after provisional disclosure.
To trditev je nadalje razdelala beloruska družba v predloženih pripombah po začasnem razkritju.
The Belarusian exporting producer indicated that a cartel investigation was currently being conducted by Italian Competition Authority (Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (‘AGCM’)) with regard to certain companies located in Northern Italy.
Beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik je navedel, da je v tistem času italijanski organ za konkurenco (Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato („AGCM“)) izvajal protikartelno preiskavo glede nekaterih družb s sedežem v severni Italiji.
One of the companies concerned is part of the sample of the Union producers in the current antidumping investigation.
Ena od zadevnih družb je del vzorca proizvajalcev v Uniji v tekoči protidampinški preiskavi.
Following this claim, the Commission requested relevant information from AGCM to evaluate whether and to what extent those facts influence the reliability of the injury data of the Union industry in the present anti-dumping proceedings.
Na podlagi te trditve je Komisija od AGCM zahtevala ustrezne informacije za oceno, ali in v kakšnem obsegu ta dejstva vplivajo na zanesljivost podatkov industrije Unije o škodi v tekoči protidampinški preiskavi.
According to the case-law, in a situation where an investigation into anti-competitive behaviour is pending at a national competition authority, the Commission has to consider whether the Union industry, through this behaviour, has contributed to the injury suffered and establish that the injury on which it bases its conclusions did not derive from the anticompetitive behaviour.
V skladu s sodno prakso mora Komisija v primeru, da nacionalni organ za konkurenco preiskuje protikonkurenčno ravnanje, proučiti, ali je industrija Unije s svojim ravnanjem prispevala k škodi, in preveriti, da škoda, na kateri temeljijo njeni sklepi, ni posledica protikonkurenčnega ravnanja.
The Commission may in such a situation not wait until the competent national authority concludes its investigation, but has to request the relevant information from the parties and the national authorities, as appropriate, under the procedural rules for anti-dumping investigations and carry out an assessment of that information [4].
Komisija v takem primeru ne sme čakati, da bo pristojni nacionalni organ zaključil preiskavo, ampak mora od strani in nacionalnih organov po potrebi zahtevati in oceniti ustrezne informacije v skladu s postopkovnimi pravili za protidampinške preiskave [4].
Following a request based on Article 6(3) of the basic Regulation, AGCM has informed the Commission that on 21 October 2015 it opened a formal investigation with respect to six Italian producers of concrete reinforcement bars and welded wire for an alleged infringement of Article 101 TFEU [5].
Na podlagi zahteve iz člena 6(3) osnovne uredbe je AGCM Komisijo obvestil, da je 21. oktobra 2015 začel formalno preiskavo glede šestih italijanskih proizvajalcev armaturnih palic in varjene žice zaradi domnevne kršitve člena 101 PDEU [5].
AGCM extended the proceedings in September 2016 to also cover under the investigation two additional Italian producers.
AGCM je septembra 2016 postopek razširil, tako da je preiskava zajela še dva italijanska proizvajalca.
Following the in-depth assessment of all available information, AGCM issued a Statement of Objections that was communicated to the relevant companies on 18 January 2017.
Upoštevni geografski trg je bil zaradi svojih značilnosti ponudbe in povpraševanja v formalnem sklepu o začetku preiskave opredeljen kot nacionalni.
The anti-competitive conduct being investigated concerns an alleged exchange of information and price collusion between the eight Italian companies that would cover several phases of the value added chain of their activities from the purchase of inputs, through the levels of production capacity and effective production, up to the sale of the output, which would have taken place over the period 2010 to 2016.
Iz informacij, ki jih je predložil AGCM, je razvidno, da se izdelek v tej preiskavi (armaturne palice) prekriva z izdelki iz protimonopolne preiskave ter da je domnevni kartelni dogovor veljal celotno obdobje preiskave.
On account of its supply and demand side characteristics, the relevant geographic market was defined as national in the formal decision to launch the investigation.
Komisija v teh okoliščinah meni, da podatki vzorčenega italijanskega proizvajalca niso zanesljivi za namen analize škode.
The information submitted by AGCM shows that the product concerned in this investigation, rebars, overlaps with the products subject to the antitrust investigation, and also that the alleged cartel was in force during the whole investigation period.
Komisija je zato analizirala potrošnjo v Uniji, obseg in tržni delež zadevnega uvoza ter makro- in mikroekonomske kazalnike škode, pri čemer ni upoštevala podatkov o italijanskem trgu.
In these circumstances, the Commission considers that the data of the sampled Italian producer is not reliable for the purpose of the injury analysis.
Zaradi preglednosti so spodaj navedeni zadevni podatki brez podatkov za italijanske družbe.
As a result, the Commission has analysed Union consumption, volume and market share of the imports concerned and also the macroeconomic and microeconomic injury indicators excluding data pertaining to the Italian market.
Makroekonomski kazalniki (preglednice):
For the sake of transparency, the relevant figures excluding the Italian companies are presented below.
Proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti
Macroeconomic indicators (tables):
Obseg proizvodnje (v tonah)
Production, production capacity and capacity utilisation
Proizvodna zmogljivost (v tonah)
Production capacity (tonnes)
Obseg, tržni delež in rast prodaje
Capacity utilisation (%)
Obseg prodaje nepovezanih družb (v tonah)
Sales volume, market share and growth
Tržni delež nepovezanih družb (v %)
Sales volume unrelated (tonnes)
Obseg prodaje povezanih družb (v tonah)
Market share unrelated sales (%)
Tržni delež povezanih družb (v %)
Sales volume related (tonnes)
Zaposlenost in produktivnost
Market share related sales (%)
Število zaposlenih
Employment and productivity
Produktivnost (v tonah na zaposlenega)
Number of employees
Mikroekonomski kazalniki (preglednice – indeksirano zaradi zaupnosti):
Productivity (MT/employee)
Povprečne prodajne cene na enoto na trgu Unije in proizvodni stroški na enoto
Microeconomic indicators (tables — indexed for confidentiality reasons):
Povprečna prodajna cena na enoto v Uniji za nepovezane stranke (v EUR na tono)
Average unit selling prices on the Union market and unit cost of production
Stroški na enoto prodanega blaga (v EUR na tono)
Unit cost of goods sold (EUR/tonne)
Dobičkonosnost prodaje nepovezanim strankam v Uniji (v % prihodka od prodaje)
Profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investments and ability to raise capital
Denarni tok (v EUR)
Return on investments
Končne zaloge (v tonah)
Stocks
Stroški dela
Closing stocks (tonnes)
Povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega (v EUR)
Labour costs
Komisija na tej podlagi ugotavlja, da je gibanje kazalnikov škode brez podatkov za Italijo praktično enako gibanju podatkov za celoten trg Unije, vključno z Italijo.
Average labour costs per employee (EUR)
Zato je mogoče skleniti, da je kljub neupoštevanju podatkov o italijanskem trgu pri analizi škode industrija Unije še vedno utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
On that basis, the Commission notes that the development of the injury indicators without the data pertaining to Italy is practically the same to the one reflecting the whole Union market including Italy.
Kar zadeva nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen, Komisija najprej ugotavlja, da je stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen, ugotovljena v začasni fazi, znašala 4,5 %.
It can therefore be concluded that following the exclusion of data relating to the Italian market from the injury analysis, the situation of the Union industry is still one of material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation
Komisija je na podlagi ugotovitev iz uvodnih izjav 19 do 23 ponovno proučila obstoj nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen.
As far as undercutting is concerned, the Commission first notes that the undercutting margin found at provisional stage was 4,5 %.
Nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen se ugotovi na podlagi podatkov vzorčenih družb.
The Commission has re-examined the existence of undercutting in the light of the findings above in recitals (19) to (23).
Komisija pri izračunu nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen zato ni upoštevala podatkov o italijanskem proizvajalcu, ki je vključen v vzorec.
Undercutting is established by using data from the sampled companies.
Stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen na podlagi vseh vzorčenih družb brez italijanskega proizvajalca je še vedno znatna, tj. 4,4 %.
Hence, the Commission has excluded from the undercutting calculations the data relating to the Italian producer that is part of the sample.
Beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da se nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih (in ciljnih) cen ne bi smelo računati s primerjavo s cenami vseh transakcij vzorčenih proizvajalcev v Uniji, ampak samo s primerjavo s cenami pri konkuriranju uvozu iz Belorusije.
The undercutting margin based on all sampled companies minus the Italian one remains significant at a level of 4,4 %.
Izračun nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen običajno temelji na dampinškem uvozu zadevnega izdelka v Unijo s celotno primerljivo prodajo industrije Unije.
The Belarussian exporting producer also claimed that the undercutting (and underselling) calculations should not be done by comparison to the prices of all transactions of the sampled Union producers but only in comparison to those happening where the competition with Belarusian import takes place.
Vendar je Komisija glede na posebne okoliščine te zadeve in posebne značilnosti zadevnega izdelka stopnjo nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen izračunala tudi z omejitvijo analize na tiste države članice, v katerih so se beloruski izdelki prodajali najprej, in sicer predvsem na Nizozemskem, v Nemčiji, na Poljskem in v Litvi.
Undercutting calculations are normally performed on the basis of dumped imports of the product concerned into the Union with all comparable sales of the Union industry.
Ta pristop temelji na konzervativni predpostavki, da je do takojšnjega in neposrednega pritiska dampinškega uvoza na prodajne cene v Uniji najprej prišlo v teh državah članicah.
However, given the specific circumstances of this case and the particular characteristics of the product concerned, the Commission has also calculated an undercutting margin by limiting the analysis to those Member States where the Belarusian products were first sold, mainly in the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, and Lithuania.
Kakršen koli naknaden učinek prelivanja na druge države članice se tako namenoma ni upošteval.
This approach is based on the conservative assumption that the immediate and direct pressure exercised by the dumped imports on Union sales prices first took place in those Member States.
V skladu s tem scenarijem so se ustrezno prilagojene tehtane povprečne cene dampinškega uvoza iz Belorusije primerjale z ustreznimi prodajnimi cenami vzorčenih proizvajalcev iz Unije, razen proizvajalca v Italiji, zaračunanimi nepovezanim strankam v tistih regijah, kjer je prišlo do neposrednega konkuriranja beloruskim izdelkom.
Any subsequent trickling through of the effect to other Member States has thus deliberately been ignored.
Dobljena stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen je tako dosegla 2,8 % in ne 4,5 %, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 68 začasne uredbe.
Under this scenario, the duly adjusted weighted average sales prices of the Belarusian dumped imports were compared to the corresponding sales prices of the sampled Union producers, excluding the one located in Italy, charged to unrelated customers in those regions where direct competition with Belarusian products occurred.
Izdelek v tej preiskavi se lahko šteje za osnovni izdelek, ki je zelo cenovno občutljiv.
This resulted in an undercutting margin of 2,8 %, instead of the 4,5 % margin as established in recital (68) of the provisional Regulation.
Zato se sklene, da je tudi stopnja nelojalnega nižanja cen v višini 2,8 % znatna in zadostuje za zniževanje cen, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 83, 84 in 98 začasne uredbe.
The product concerned by this investigation can be considered a commodity product, which is very price sensitive.
Po končnem razkritju je beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik trdil tudi, da bi ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 19 do 23 verjetno imele učinek prelivanja na druge države članice, zlasti Francijo, kjer ima matična družba enega od italijanskih proizvajalcev odvisno družbo z močnim položajem na trgu.
It is therefore concluded that even an undercutting margin of 2,8 % is significant and sufficient to cause price depression as explained in recitals (83), (84) and (98) of the provisional Regulation.
Vendar je AGCM v zvezi z domnevnim protikonkurenčnim ravnanjem v Italiji upoštevni geografski trg opredelil kot nacionalni.
Following final disclosure, the Belarussian exporting producer also claimed that the findings above in recitals (19) to (23) would most likely have spill-over effects on other Member States, especially in France, where the parent company of one of the Italian producers has a subsidiary holding a strong market position.
Poleg tega dokazi v spisu, povzeti v uvodnih izjavah 19 do 23, sami po sebi ne podpirajo te trditve.
However, with respect to the alleged anti-competitive conduct in Italy, AGCM has defined the relevant geographic market as national.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne.