natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 8 February 2016, by order of the legal person located outside Saint Vincent and the Grenadines to which the management of the registry has been delegated, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines authorities deleted the vessel from the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines registry of ships for ‘misuse of the registry certificates which were not valid for navigation’.
Komisija od organov Saint Vincenta in Grenadin ni prejela nobenega obvestila z informacijami v zvezi s plovilom Asian Warrior.
Whereas the Asian Warrior was involved in several IUU activities when operating under the flag of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, including the entry of illegal catches into the market, the authorities of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines did not take any administrative or penal measure in this respect other than removal of the vessel from the national registry.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zbrala Komisija, je bilo februarja 2016 sporočeno, da plovilo Gotland, ki pluje pod zastavo Saint Vincenta in Grenadin [5], brez dovoljenja lovi v izključni ekonomski coni Senegala.
Furthermore, the vessel Asian Warrior has been included on the IUU vessel list of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) since 2003 and Interpol issued a Purple Notice on 13 January 2015 which had been last updated on 29 September 2015.
V zvezi s tem so senegalski organi izdali ukaz za zasledovanje in zadržanje plovila, ki je pobegnilo.
The simple administrative decision to remove a fishing vessel from the register without ensuring the possibility to impose other penalties is an act that does not ensure deterrent effects.
Ker navedene dejavnosti pomenijo kršitev senegalskega kodeksa o pomorskem ribolovu [6], so senegalski organi ribiško plovilo Gotland kaznovali s kaznijo 1030000000 CFA–frankov [7].
De-registration of a fishing vessel does not ensure that offenders are sanctioned for their actions and deprived from the benefits of their actions.
Komisija je na podlagi prošnje senegalskih organov za pomoč navezala stike z organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin, predvsem da bi poudarila pomembnost, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine za navedeno plovilo sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe.
Moreover, the lack of proper reaction by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and the lack of cooperation with the competent authorities of the port States concerned is not in line with its obligations laid down in Article 6 of the FAO Agreement on Port State Measures to prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing.
Komisija doslej od Saint Vincenta in Grenadin ni prejela nobenega odgovora in tudi ni seznanjena z nobenim odgovorom na prošnje za medsebojno pomoč, ki so jih poslale države članice v okviru člena 51 uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu.
The Commission has not received any communication from the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines authorities providing information with regards the Asian Warrior.
Komisija je obveščena, da so podobne pobude predložile tudi nekatere tretje države.
From the information gathered by the Commission, a vessel flagged to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Gotland [5], was reported in February 2016 to be fishing without authorisation in the Economic Exclusive Zone of Senegal.
Komisija tudi iz nobenih drugih virov ni bila obveščena o morebitnih ukrepih, ki so jih v zvezi z zadevnim plovilom sprejeli organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin.
In that respect, Senegalese authorities gave the order to pursue and detain the vessel which fled.
Glede informacij iz uvodnih izjav 37 do 43 Komisija meni, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine niso izpolnili svojih obveznosti kot država zastave, da bi svojemu ladjevju preprečili opravljanje nezakonitih, neprijavljenih in nereguliranih ribolovnih dejavnosti.
Since those activities constitute an infringement of the Senegalese Maritime Fisheries Code [6], the Senegalese authorities sanctioned the fishing vessel Gotland with a fine of CFA 1030000000 [7].
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da mora imeti država zastave v skladu s svojim notranjim pravom pristojnost nad ladjami, ki plujejo pod njeno zastavo, vključno z ravnanjem njihovih poveljnikov, častnikov in posadke, kot je določeno v členu 94(2)(b) UNCLOS.
Following a request of assistance from the Senegalese authorities, the Commission entered in contact with the authorities of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines notably to underline the importance for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines to take appropriate measures with respect to that vessel.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da mora država zastave v skladu s členom 117 UNCLOS za svoje zadevne državljane sprejeti ukrepe, ki so potrebni za ohranjanje živih virov odprtega morja, ali sodelovati z drugimi državami pri sprejemanju takih ukrepov.
Up to date, the Commission has not received any reply from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and has not been made aware of any reply to the requests for mutual assistance sent by Member States in the framework of Article 51 of the IUU Regulation.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 31(4)(b) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu preučila tudi ukrepe, ki so jih Saint Vincent in Grenadine sprejeli glede dostopa ribiških proizvodov, pridobljenih z nezakonitim, neprijavljenim in nereguliranim ribolovom, na svoj trg.
The Commission has also been informed that some third countries also took similar initiatives.
Mednarodni akcijski načrt za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova določa smernice za mednarodno dogovorjene tržne ukrepe, ki podpirajo zmanjšanje ali odpravo trgovine z ribami in ribiškimi proizvodi, pridobljenimi z nezakonitim, neprijavljenim in nereguliranim ribolovom.
The Commission has not been made aware from any other sources of any measures being taken by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in relation to the vessel in question.
V točki 71 predlaga tudi, da bi morale države sprejeti ukrepe za izboljšanje preglednosti na svojih trgih, kar bi omogočilo sledljivost rib ali ribiških proizvodov.
With regard to information laid down in recitals 37 to 43, the Commission considers that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has failed to uphold its responsibilities as flag State to prevent its fleet from engaging in IUU activities.
Tudi Kodeks ravnanja za odgovorno ribištvo Organizacije ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Kodeks ravnanja FAO) predvsem v členu 11 navaja dobre prakse za dejavnosti po ulovu in odgovorno mednarodno trgovino.
In this respect it is recalled that, pursuant to Article 94(2)(b) of Unclos, the flag State must assume jurisdiction under internal law over ships flying its flag, including the actions of master, officers and crew on-board.
Člen 11.1.11 navedenega kodeksa ravnanja od držav zahteva zagotovilo, da se z ribami in ribiškimi proizvodi na mednarodni in domači ravni trguje skladno s premišljenimi praksami za ohranjanje in upravljanje, tako da se izboljša prepoznavanje porekla rib in ribiških proizvodov.
It is noted that according to Article 117 of Unclos, the flag State has the duty to take, or to cooperate with other States in taking, such measures for their respective nationals as may be necessary for the conservation of living resources of the high seas.
Komisija je v času dveh obiskov, ki ju je opravila na Saint Vincentu in Grenadinah maja 2014, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 9 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, in februarja 2016, ugotovila, da pristojni organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin niso mogli zagotoviti ustreznega nadzora dejavnosti svoje ribiške flote.
Under Article 31(4)(b) of the IUU Regulation, the Commission also examined the measures taken by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in respect of access of fisheries products stemming from IUU fishing to its market.
Pristojni organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin so trdili, da vsa njihova ribiška plovila, ki opravljajo dejavnost na območju ICCAT, iztovarjajo ali pretovarjajo izključno v pristaniščih Trinidada in Tobaga (Port of Spain in Chaguaramas).
The IPOA IUU provides guidance on internationally agreed market-related measures which support reduction or elimination of trade in fish and fish products derived from IUU fishing.
Vendar pa Saint Vincent in Grenadine zaradi nezadostnega sodelovanja z organi Trinidada in Tobaga ne morejo zagotoviti podatkov o značilnostih vrst, ulovljenih s plovili, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo na odprtem morju, ali o ribiških proizvodih, iztovorjenih ali pretovorjenih v pristaniščih Trinidada in Tobaga, ter o trgovinskih tokovih navedenih proizvodov.
It also suggests at point 71 that States should take steps to improve the transparency of their markets in order to allow the traceability of fish or fish products.
Organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin v zvezi s tem niso sodelovali z organi držav pristanišča, kar je v nasprotju s členom 20 sporazuma FAO o ukrepih države pristanišča za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje.
Equally, the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (Code of Conduct) outlines, in particular in Article 11, good practices for post-harvest activities and responsible international trade.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 38, organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin tudi niso preprečili iztovarjanja ribiških proizvodov, pridobljenih z nezakonitim, neprijavljenim in nereguliranim ribolovom, v svojih pristaniščih, zaradi česar obstaja tveganje, da se navedenim proizvodom dovoli dostop na trg.
Article 11.1.11 of that Code of Conduct requests States to ensure that fish and fishery products are traded internationally and domestically in accordance with sound conservation and management practices through improving the identification of the origin of fish and fishery products.
Komisija na podlagi podatkov, pridobljenih med obiskom na kraju samem, meni, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine ne morejo zagotoviti preglednosti na svojih trgih, kar bi omogočilo sledljivost rib ali ribiških proizvodov, kot je določeno v členu 71 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter členu 11.1.11 Kodeksa ravnanja FAO.
During the two visits carried out in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in May 2014, as mentioned in recital 9 of Decision of 12 December 2014, and February 2016, the Commission established that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines competent authorities were not in a position to ensure an adequate control of the activities of their fishing fleet.
V zvezi s tem se zdi, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine ne izpolnjujejo obveznosti države pristanišča, določenih v členu 23 Sporazuma ZN o staležih rib (UNFSA), glede sprejetja ukrepov za spodbujanje učinkovitosti mednarodnih ukrepov za ohranjanje in upravljanje, vključno s pristaniškimi pregledi dokumentov, orodja ali ulova ter prepovedjo iztovarjanja in pretovarjanja, kadar je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil ulov pridobljen na način, ki zmanjšuje učinkovitost teh ukrepov za ohranjanje in upravljanje.
The competent authorities of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines submitted that all their fishing vessels operating in the ICCAT area land or tranship exclusively in Trinidad and Tobago Ports (Port of Spain and Chaguaramas).
Komisija na podlagi razvoja dogodkov po 12. decembru 2014 in na podlagi člena 31(3) in (4) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu meni, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine niso izpolnili dolžnosti, ki so jim naložene z mednarodnim pravom kot državi zastave in zadevajo nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov, ki ga opravljajo ali omogočajo ribiška plovila pod njihovo zastavo ali njihovi državljani, ter da niso sprejeli zadostnih ukrepov za preprečevanje dostopa ribiških proizvodov, ki so pridobljeni z nezakonitim, neprijavljenim in nereguliranim ribolovom, na svoj trg.
However, due to lack of cooperation with Trinidad and Tobago authorities, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is not in a position to provide information on the characteristics of the species caught by vessels operating under its flag in high seas or on the fishing products landed or transhipped in Trinidad and Tobago ports and on the trade flows of those products.
Nesodelovanje in neizvrševanje (člen 31(5) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu)
In this respect, the authorities of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines fail to cooperate with port States authorities in contravention of Article 20 of the FAO Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing.
Komisija je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 20 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, analizirala, ali so Saint Vincent in Grenadine učinkovito sodelovali s Komisijo pri preiskavah in povezanih dejavnostih, in ugotovila, da organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin Komisiji za ribištvo niso predložili nobenih informacij ali odgovora o tem, kako bodo odpravili pomanjkljivosti svojega sistema za upravljanje ribištva, ki so bile ugotovljene med obiskom Komisije.
Furthermore, as described in recital 38, the authorities of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines failed to prevent fishery products stemming from IUU fishing from being landed in ports, with the consequent risk that those products be granted access to the market.
Komisija je po sprejetju Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014 ugotovila, da se organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin niso odzvali na prošnje Komisije za sodelovanje v zvezi z nezakonitimi ribolovnimi dejavnostmi plovil Asian Warrior in Gotland.
On the basis of the information retrieved from the on-spot visits, the Commission considers that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is not in a position to guarantee the transparency of its markets in a way to allow the traceability of fish or fish products as required in point 71 of the IPOA IUU and Article 11.1.11 of the FAO Code of Conduct.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zbrala Komisija, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je to pomanjkanje sodelovanja vplivalo tudi na prošnje za pomoč, ki so jih organom Saint Vincenta in Grenadin poslale države članice in tretje države v okviru preiskav in povezanih dejavnosti.
In that regard, it appears that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines fails to comply with the port State obligation, established in Article 23 of UNFSA, of taking action to promote the effectiveness of international conservation and management measures, including port inspections of documents, gears or catches and the prohibition to land or tranship where it has been established that the catch has been taken in a manner which undermines the effectiveness of international conservation and management measures.
Poleg tega se dokumenti, ki so bili predloženi Komisiji v zvezi z akcijskim načrtom po sprejetju Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, niso odrazili v nobenih konkretnih ukrepih.
In view of the developments occurring after 12 December 2014, the Commission considers, pursuant to Article 31(3) and (4) of the IUU Regulation, that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has failed to discharge its duties under international law as a flag State in respect of IUU fishing carried out or supported by fishing vessels flying its flag or by its nationals and has not taken sufficient action to prevent access of fisheries products stemming from IUU fishing to its market.
Komisija je pri ocenjevanju, ali Saint Vincent in Grenadine izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti kot država zastave, preučila tudi, ali so sodelovali z drugimi državami pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu.
Failure to cooperate and to enforce (Article 31(5) of the IUU Regulation)
Komisija je na podlagi podatkov, pridobljenih med obiski na kraju samem maja 2014 in februarja 2016 ter od organov tretjih obalnih držav, ugotovila, da plovila pod zastavo Saint Vincenta in Grenadin, ki opravljajo dejavnosti na območju ICCAT, iztovarjajo in pretovarjajo v pristaniščih Trinidada in Tobaga.
As described in recital 20 of the Decision of 12 December 2014, the Commission analysed whether Saint Vincent and the Grenadines cooperated effectively with the Commission on investigations and associated activities and concluded that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines fisheries has not provided to the Commission any information or reply on how it will address the deficiencies in its fisheries management system identified during the Commission's visit.After the Decision of 12 December 2014, the Commission found that the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines authorities did not react to the Commission cooperation requests in relation to the illegal fishing activities of the vessels Asian Warrior and Gotland.
Organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin so priznali, da njihova vlada ni uradno sodelovala z organi Trinidada in Tobaga.
Based on the information gathered by the Commission, it was established that this lack of cooperation also affected requests for assistance sent by Member States and third countries to the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines authorities in the context of investigations and associated activities.
Od Sklepa Komisije z dne 12. decembra 2014 ni bilo v zvezi s tem nobenega napredka.
Furthermore, the documents submitted to the Commission in relation to the Action Plan following the Decision of 12 December 2014 did not translate into any concrete action.
Stanje, opisano v uvodni izjavi 53, kaže, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine s tretjimi državami, v katerih plovila pod zastavo Saint Vincenta in Grenadin iztovarjajo ali pretovarjajo, niso sodelovali in usklajevali dejavnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje, kot zahteva člen 28 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
In addition, when assessing whether Saint Vincent and the Grenadines complied with its obligations as a flag State, the Commission also analysed whether it cooperated with other States in the fight against IUU fishing.
Saint Vincent in Grenadine tudi niso sklenili dogovorov ali sporazumov z drugimi državami in drugače sodelovali pri izvrševanju veljavnih zakonov ter ukrepov ali določb za ohranjanje in upravljanje na nacionalni, regionalni ali svetovni ravni, kot je določeno v členu 31 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
Based on the information retrieved during the on-spot visits on May 2014 and February 2016 and from the authorities of third coastal countries, the Commission established that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines flagged vessels operating in the ICCAT area land and tranship in Trinidad and Tobago ports.
Komisija je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 25 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, analizirala tudi, ali so Saint Vincent in Grenadine sprejeli učinkovite izvršilne ukrepe v zvezi z izvajalci dejavnosti, odgovornimi za nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov, in ali se uporabljajo dovolj stroge sankcije, da ostanejo kršitelji brez koristi, ki izhajajo iz nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines authorities acknowledged that their government did not formally cooperate with the authorities of Trinidad and Tobago.
Razpoložljivi dokazi potrjujejo, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine niso izpolnili svojih obveznosti glede učinkovitih izvršilnih ukrepov v skladu z mednarodnim pravom.
No progress has been made in this respect since the Commission Decision of 12 December 2014.
Saint Vincent in Grenadine niso pripravili nacionalne strategije spremljanja, nadzora in obvladovanja svoje ribiške flote ter programa inšpekcijskih pregledov in opazovanja.
The situation described in recital 53 indicates that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines failed to cooperate and coordinate activities with third countries, where Saint Vincent and the Grenadines flagged vessels land or tranship, in order to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing as required by point 28 of the IPOA IUU.
Komisija je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 27 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, med obiskom na kraju samem maja 2014 lahko ugotovila, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine niso mogli spremljati svojih plovil, ki opravljajo dejavnosti na odprtem morju, v vodah tretjih držav ali pristajajo v pristaniščih tretjih držav.
Furthermore, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has not entered into agreements or arrangements with other States and otherwise cooperate for the enforcement of applicable laws and conservation and management measures or provisions adopted at a national, regional or global level, as established in point 31 of the IPOA IUU.
Komisija je med obiskom na kraju samem februarja 2016 lahko preverila, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine niso odpravili pomanjkljivega spremljanja flote in zato niso izpolnili člena 94 konvencije UNCLOS, ki določa, da ima država zastave v skladu s svojim notranjim pravom pristojnost nad vsako ladjo, ki pluje pod njeno zastavo, vključno z njenim poveljnikom, častniki in posadko.
As explained in recital 25 of the Decision of 12 December 2014, the Commission also analysed whether Saint Vincent and the Grenadines had taken effective enforcement measures in respect of operators responsible for IUU fishing and whether sanctions of sufficient severity to deprive the offenders of the benefits accruing from their IUU fishing activities had been applied.
Saint Vincent in Grenadine kršijo tudi člen 18(3) Sporazuma ZN o staležih rib (UNFSA), ki določa ukrepe, ki jih mora sprejeti država v zvezi s plovili, ki plujejo pod njeno zastavo.
Available evidence confirms that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has not fulfilled its obligations under international law with respect to effective enforcement measures.
Saint Vincent in Grenadine kot država zastave prav tako ne izpolnjujejo svojih obveznosti glede skladnosti in izvrševanja, določenih v členu 19 Sporazuma ZN o staležih rib (UNFSA), saj niso dokazali, da so ukrepali in delovali v skladu s podrobnimi pravili iz navedenega člena.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has not developed any national strategy on monitoring, control and surveillance of its fishing fleet, inspections and observer schemes.
Pravni okvir za upravljanje flote Saint Vincenta in Grenadin, ki temelji na zakonu o odprtem morju iz leta 2001 in uredbi o ribolovu na odprtem morju iz leta 2003, ne vključuje opredelitve dejavnosti nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
As highlighted in recital 27 of the Decision of 12 December 2014, during the on-spot visit in May 2014 the Commission could observe that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines was not in a position to monitor its vessels operating in the high seas, in third countries' waters or calling in third countries ports.
Veljavni pravni okvir tudi ne vsebuje opredelitve resnih kršitev in celovitega seznama resnih kaznivih dejanj, obravnavanih s sorazmernimi strogimi sankcijami.
During the on-spot visit of February 2016, the Commission could verify that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines had not remedy the deficient monitoring of the fleet and therefore failed to fulfil Article 94 of Unclos which provides that a flag State assumes jurisdiction under its internal law over each ship flying its flag and its master, officers and crew.
Veljavni sistem sankcij zato ni celovit in dovolj strog, da bi bil odvračilen.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is also in breach with Article 18(3) UNFSA which stipulates measures to be taken by a State in respect of vessels flying its flag.
Obravnava kršitev in resnih kršitev ni primerna, da bi zagotovila skladnost, povsod odvrnila od kršitev in kršiteljem odvzela koristi, ki izhajajo iz njihovih nezakonitih dejavnosti, kot zahtevata člen 21 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter člen 38 Smernic FAO o uspešnosti države zastave.
Furthermore, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines does not fulfil its compliance and enforcement obligations as a flag State stipulated in Article 19 of the UNFSA since it has failed to demonstrate that it acted and operated in accordance with the detailed rules laid down in that Article.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 30 in 31 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, stopnje razvoja Saint Vincenta in Grenadin ni mogoče obravnavati kot dejavnika, ki bi zmanjševal zmogljivost pristojnih organov v zvezi s sodelovanjem z drugimi državami in sprejemanjem izvršilnih ukrepov.