natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The information on the initiation of the investigation and the Notice of Initiation (which included a sampling form) were sent to the 10 Taiwanese companies identified in the complaint as exporting producers of the product concerned to the Union.
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, zahtevki za TGO in zahtevki za individualno preiskavo
In addition, the Taipei Representative Office in the European Union was requested to identify and/or contact additional exporting producers, if any.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi lahko v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, je vse proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK pozvala, naj se ji javijo in predložijo informacije, opredeljene v obvestilu o začetku.
Four exporting producers in Taiwan provided the information requested in the Notice of Initiation and agreed to be included in the sample.
Poleg tega je bila misija Ljudske republike Kitajske pri Evropski uniji pozvana, naj opredeli dodatne proizvajalce izvoznike, če ti obstajajo, in/ali naveže stik z njimi.
Taking into account the number of cooperating Taiwanese exporting producers, sampling was not considered necessary.
Zahtevane informacije je predložilo devet proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK, ki so zaprosili za vključitev v vzorec.
During the investigation, two of the four companies did not further cooperate.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec štirih družb ali skupin družb, ki so predstavljale približno 79 % izvoza sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Unijo in ocenjenih 35 % skupnih količin, izvoženih iz LRK v Unijo v obdobju preiskave.
The Commission informed these companies that, according to Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, provisional or final findings, affirmative or negative, may be made on the basis of the facts available.
Merilo, uporabljeno za izbiro štirih družb, vključenih v vzorec, je bilo obseg izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v obdobju preiskave.
Sampling of exporting producers in the PRC, MET claims and requests for individual examination
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe so bila z vsemi znanimi zadevnimi proizvajalci izvozniki in organi zadevne države opravljena posvetovanja o izbiri vzorca, pripomb pa ni bilo.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers in the PRC were requested to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Med preiskavo je ena od štirih vzorčenih družb odstopila od sodelovanja.
In addition, the Mission of the People's Republic of China to the European Union was requested to identify and/or contact additional exporting producers, if any.
Komisija jo je obvestila, da se lahko na podlagi člena 18(1) osnovne uredbe začasne ali dokončne ugotovitve, bodisi pozitivne bodisi negativne, naredijo na osnovi dostopnih dejstev.
Nine exporting producers in the PRC provided the requested information and requested to be included in the sample.
Nobeden od sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK ni zahteval tržnogospodarske obravnave („TGO“).
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected a sample of four companies or groups of companies, representing around 79 % of the exports of the cooperating exporting producers to the Union and an estimated 35 % of the total quantities exported from PRC to the Union during the investigation period.
Vendar pa je pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, zahtevalo individualno preiskavo na podlagi člena 17(3) osnovne uredbe.
The criterion used to select the four companies included in the sample was the volumes of exports of the product concerned to the Union during the investigation period.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 99, te zahteve niso bile odobrene.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned and the authorities of the country concerned were consulted on the selection of the sample, and no comments were received.
Izpolnjeni vprašalniki
In the course of the investigation, one of the four sampled companies did not further cooperate.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani štirim družbam v Tajvanu in štirim vzorčenim družbam v LRK, štirim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije in trem vzorčenim uvoznikom.
The Commission informed this company that according to Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, provisional or final findings, affirmative or negative, may be made on the basis of the facts available.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali samo dve družbi iz Tajvana, tri iz LRK, trije proizvajalci Unije in trije uvozniki.
None of the cooperating exporting producers in the PRC claimed market economy treatment (‘MET’).
Po začasnem razkritju je izpolnjen vprašalnik poslal tudi eden od proizvajalcev iz morebitne primerljive države s sedežem v Švici.
However, five exporting producers in the PRC which were not included in the sample requested individual examination under Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Preveritveni obiski
As mentioned in recital 99, these requests were not granted.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za ugotovitev dampinga, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
Questionnaire replies
Preveritveni obiski v skladu s členom 16 osnovne uredbe so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih družb/združenja:
Questionnaires were sent to the four companies in Taiwan and the four sampled companies in the PRC, to the four sampled Union producers and to the three sampled importers.
proizvajalci Unije:
Questionnaire replies were received only from two companies in Taiwan, three in the PRC, three Union producers and three importers.
OSTP Sweden AB, Švedska,
After provisional disclosure, a questionnaire reply was also received from one of the potential analogue country producers located in Switzerland.
OSTP Finland OY, Finska,
Verification visits
Erne Fittings, Avstrija,
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
nepovezani uvoznik:
Verification visits pursuant to Article 16 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies/association:
Arcus Nederland BV, Nizozemska,
union producers:
proizvajalca izvoznika v Tajvanu:
OSTP Finland OY, Finland,
Ltd., Taichung,
unrelated importer:
Ltd.
Arcus Nederland BV, the Netherlands,
Tainan,
exporting producers in Taiwan:
proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK:
Ta Chen Stainless Pipes Co.
Suzhou Yuli Pipeline Industry Co.
Ltd, Taichung,
Ltd. in njene povezane družbe, Suzhou, Jiangsu in Shanghai,
King Lai Hygienic Materials Co.
Zhejiang Jndia Pipeline Industry Co.
Ltd Tainan,
Ltd., Wenzhou,
exporting producers in the PRC:
Zhejiang Good Fittings Co.
Suzhou Yuli Pipeline Industry Co.
Ltd., Wenzhou.
Ltd and its related companies, Suzhou, Jiangsu and Shanghai,
Preveritveni obisk je bil opravljen tudi v prostorih švicarske družbe Rohrbogen AG (Basel), ki se je štela za proizvajalca iz morebitne primerljive države.
Zhejiang Jndia Pipeline Industry Co.
Ta preveritveni obisk je bil opravljen po začasnem razkritju.
Ltd, Wenzhou,
Začasno razkritje
Zhejiang Good Fittings Co.
Komisija se je v začasni fazi preiskave odločila, da ne bo uvedla začasnih protidampinških ukrepov.
A verification visit was also carried out at the premises of the Swiss company Rohrbogen AG (Basel), which was considered as potential analogue country producer.
Ker stopnja dampinga za LRK ni bila določena, ni bilo mogoče določiti niti ravni skupnega dampinškega uvoza iz obeh zadevnih držav.
This verification visit took place after provisional disclosure.
Čeprav so bili za analizo različnih kazalnikov škode podatki v zvezi z industrijo Unije na voljo, so v skladu s členom 3 osnovne uredbe obseg in cene dampinškega uvoza nepogrešljiv element pri določitvi škode.
At the provisional stage of the investigation the Commission decided not to impose provisional anti-dumping measures.
Vsa ta stališča so obravnavana v naslednjih uvodnih izjavah.
The main reason for this decision was the ongoing search for an appropriate analogue country on the basis of which normal value would be established for the Chinese exporting producers.
Dokončno razkritje
In the absence of a dumping margin determination for the PRC, also the level of cumulated dumped imports from both countries concerned could not be established.
Trije kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, CCCMC, dva uvoznika Unije in pritožnik so pripombe predložili po dokončnem razkritju, zaslišanje pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje je zahteval proizvajalec Unije, ki je imel tudi dogovor o pasivnem oplemenitenju, zaslišanje pred službami Komisije pa je zahtevala CCCMC.
While the data with regard to the Union industry was available for the purposes of the analysis of the various injury indicators, the volume and prices of the dumped imports are an indispensable element in the determination of injury in accordance with Article 3 of the basic Regulation.
Proizvajalec Unije je med zaslišanjem pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje zahteval, naj se izdelki, ki so ponovno uvoženi po pasivnem oplemenitenju, oprostijo dajatev, ker ne povzročajo škode industriji Unije, saj je zelo malo prekrivanja s proizvodnjo pritožnikov in ker uvedba dajatev ne bi bila v interesu Unije, če se upoštevajo njegov status MSP, dejstvo, da je prejel strukturna sredstva EU za vzpostavitev tovarne, in dejstvo, da bi uvedba dajatev uničila njegov posel.
Therefore, no determination of injury, and consequently of the causal link between injury and dumped imports, was made at the provisional stage of the investigation.
Komisija je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo morebitna stališča v zvezi s tem.
Interested parties received a provisional disclosure on 13 July 2016.
Poleg tega je en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik zahteval popravek svojega imena, ki je bilo napačno zapisano, en uvoznik Unije pa je predlagal natančnejšo opredelitev pojma „pribor (fitingi) z majhno hrapavostjo“, kar je Komisija sprejela.
Submissions after provisional disclosure were received from one Taiwanese exporting producer, one Chinese exporting producer, the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals and Chemical Importers & Exporters (‘CCCMC’) and the complainant.
Dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika in CCCMC so v zvezi z dokončnim razkritjem trdili, da obdobje, ki ga je Komisija določila za predložitev pripomb zainteresiranih strani, ni bilo ustrezno in jim ni omogočalo, da bi v celoti in izčrpno obravnavali vse podatke in razloge, ki so bili prvič predstavljeni v dokončnem razkritju.
All these submissions are dealt with in the following recitals.
Menili so, da to za zainteresirane strani v tem postopku pomeni resno kršitev pravic do obrambe.
Final disclosure
Komisija je navedla, da protidampinški postopek, ki se je začel na podlagi člena 5 osnovne uredbe, poteka v skladu s strogimi roki.
Interested parties received the final disclosure document on 27 October 2016.
Zadevnim zainteresiranim stranem sta bila razkrita odločitev Komisije, da ne bo uvedla začasnih ukrepov, in predlog Komisije za uvedbo dokončnih ukrepov, obenem pa jim je bil zagotovljen razumen čas za odgovor.
The Commission invited the interested parties to submit written comments and/or to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings by 16 November 2016.
V skladu s členom 20(5) osnovne uredbe mora Komisija določiti rok za pripombe, ki je najmanj deset dni po dokončnem razkritju.
Three Chinese exporting producers, the CCCMC, two Union importers and the complainant submitted comments after final disclosure, and a hearing with the hearing officer was requested by the Union producer that also had an outward processing arrangement and a hearing with the Commission services was requested by the CCCMC.
Komisija je dala na voljo 22 dni in tako ravnala v skladu s to zahtevo.
During the hearing with the Hearing Officer, the Union producer has requested that the products that are re-imported following the outward-processing be exempted from the duties, because they are not causing injury to the Union industry as there is very little overlap with the production of the complainants and because it would not be in the Union interest to impose duties, taking into account its status as SME, the fact that it has received EU structural funds to establish its factory, and the fact that imposing duties would destroy its business.
Nobena zainteresirana stran ni zaprosila za podaljšanje tega roka.
The Commission invited interested parties to express any views they may have in this regard.
Poudariti je treba tudi, da v začasni fazi ni bilo mogoče razkriti nobenih dodatnih podatkov, in sicer ne samo glede ugotovitev o dampingu v zvezi z LRK, ampak tudi glede škode.
In addition, one Chinese exporting producer requested the correction of its name which had been misspelled, and one Union importer suggested a more precise definition of ‘low roughness fittings’, which was accepted by the Commission.
Ker stopnja dampinga za LRK ni bila določena, ni bilo mogoče določiti ravni dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
With regard to the final disclosure, two Chinese exporting producers and CCCMC claimed that the period provided by the Commission for the submission of the comments by interested parties was inadequate and did not allow them to fully and comprehensively address all the data and reasoning, which had been presented for the first time in the final disclosure.
Čeprav so za analizo različnih kazalnikov škode na voljo podatki v zvezi z industrijo Unije, so v skladu s členom 3 osnovne uredbe obseg in cene dampinškega uvoza nepogrešljiv element pri določitvi škode.
They considered that a serious breach of the interested parties' rights of defence in this proceeding.
V začasni fazi preiskave torej škoda ni bila določena.
The interested parties in question have received disclosure of the Commission's decision not to impose provisional measures and of the Commission's proposal for the imposition of definitive measures and have been reasonable time to respond.
Komisija je po pripombah in zahtevah nekaterih zainteresiranih strani po dokončnem razkritju razkrila dodatne podatke in informacije.
Under Article 20(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission must set a deadline for at least 10 days for comments after final disclosure.
Pritožnik je med zaslišanjem pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje zahteval, naj se zahteva za oprostitev za sistem pasivnega oplemenitenja, ki jo je vložil eden od proizvajalcev Unije, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 35 zgoraj, ne odobri, ker zadevni proizvajalec Unije tudi uvaža zadevni izdelek, proizveden na Kitajskem.
By giving 22 days the Commission has complied with this requirement.
Poleg tega v nasprotju z njegovimi trditvami njegovi izdelki konkurirajo izdelku, ki ga proizvaja industrija Unije.
No interested party requested any extension in this respect.
Pritožnik je med istim zaslišanjem tudi pojasnil, da večina trgovcev v Uniji skladišči izdelke, ki so dvojno certificirani, in sicer v skladu s standardi EN/DIN in standardi ASME/ANSI.
It is also stressed that no additional data could be disclosed at the provisional stage, not only with regard to dumping findings concerning PRC but also with regard to injury.
Poleg tega so v nasprotju s trditvijo enega od trgovcev izdelki, ki so certificirani v skladu z različnimi standardi, medsebojno zamenljivi.
In the absence of dumping margin determination for the PRC, the level of dumped imports from the countries concerned could not be established.
Dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika in CCCMC so ponovili svoje trditve, zlasti v zvezi z nerazkritjem ugotovitev o škodi v začasni fazi, ki ga po njihovem mnenju ni bilo mogoče upravičiti s pomanjkanjem podatkov.
While the data with regard to the Union industry is available for the purposes of the analysis of the various injury indicators, the volume and prices of the dumped imports are an indispensable element in the determination of injury in accordance with Article 3 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija v odgovor na zgornje opozarja, da se lahko sklepi o kazalnikih škode razkrijejo šele, ko je določen obseg dampinškega uvoza.
Therefore, no determination of injury was made at the provisional stage of the investigation.
V tej konkretni zadevi v začasni fazi damping za LRK ni bil določen.
The claim was therefore rejected.
Dejstvo, da so bili zbrani neobdelani podatki za kazalnike škode, ne pomeni, da je bil mogoč sklep o kazalnikih škode.
Following comments and requests of some of the interested parties after final disclosure the Commission disclosed additional data and information.
Komisija je zagotovila ustrezno razkritje v smislu člena 20 osnovne uredbe.
This additional disclosure took place on 25 November 2016.
Meni, da so bile za zainteresirane strani pravice do obrambe upoštevane.
Subsequent submissions were received from two Chinese exporting producers, the CCCMC, the Complainant and three Union importers.
Obdobje preiskave in obravnavano obdobje
During the hearing with the Hearing Officer, the Complainant requested that the exemption request for an outward processing scheme submitted by one of the Union producer as explained in recital 35 above should not be granted as the Union producer in question is also importing the product concerned produced in China.
Preiskava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2014 do 30. septembra 2015 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
Furthermore, contrary to what it had claimed, its products are in competition with the product produced by the Union industry.
Preučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2012 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
During the same hearing the Complainant also explained that majority of the traders in the Union store products that are double certified both under the EN/DIN and ASME/ANSI standards.
Po dokončnem razkritju je več zainteresiranih strani trdilo, da bi morala Komisija namesto obdobja 2012–OP preučiti obdobje 2010–OP.
Moreover contrary to the claim of one the traders products subject to different standards are interchangeable.
Običajna praksa Komisije je, da za analizo gibanj škode uporabi štiriletno obdobje.
Two Chinese exporting producers and CCCMC reiterated their claims, especially with regard to the lack of disclosure of the injury findings at the provisional stage which in their opinion could not be justified by the lack of data.
Strani niso predložile dokazov v podporo trditvi, da je bilo obravnavano obdobje neustrezno.
In response to the above the Commission notes that conclusions on injury indicators can only be disclosed once the volume of dumped imports is determined.
Po dodatnem razkritju so dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika in CCCMC ponovili svojo trditev glede obravnavanega obdobja za preučitev gibanj škode.
In this particular case at provisional stage no dumping determination had been made for the PRC.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je običajna praksa Komisije, da na podlagi svoje široke diskrecijske pravice pri preiskavah trgovinske zaščite za oceno škode uporabi štiriletno obdobje.
The fact that the raw data for injury indicators had been collected and does not mean that the conclusion on injury indicators could be established.
Poleg tega zainteresirane strani niso predložile prepričljivih dokazov, na podlagi katerih bi Komisija morala odstopati od svoje običajne prakse.
The Commission provided an adequate disclosure within the meaning of Article 20 of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je bila zadeva [5], na katero so se sklicevale zainteresirane strani, zaradi umika pritožbe ustavljena.
The Commission considers that the rights of defence of these interested parties were respected.
Zato v navedeni zadevi škoda ni bila določena.
Investigation period and period considered
Poleg tega se zadevni izdelek v tej preiskavi razlikuje od zadevnega izdelka v ustavljeni preiskavi.
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 October 2014 to 30 September 2015 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2012 to the end of the investigation period (‘period considered’).
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
Following the definitive disclosure, several interested parties claimed that the Commission should have examined the period 2010 — IP instead of 2012 — IP.
Zadevni izdelek
It is the standard practice of the Commission to use 4 years period to analyse the injury trends.
Izdelek v tej preiskavi je pribor (fitingi) za varjenje cevi iz različnih vrst avstenitnega nerjavnega jekla, ki ustreza tipom AISI 304, 304L, 316, 316L, 316Ti, 321 in 321H ter njihovim ekvivalentom v drugih normativih, z največjim zunanjim premerom do vključno 406,4 mm in debelino stene 16 mm ali manj, s hrapavostjo najmanj 0,8 mikrometra, brez prirobnice, dokončan ali nedokončan, s poreklom iz LRK in Tajvana.
The parties failed to submit any evidence that would have supported the conclusion that the period considered was inappropriate.
Izdelek je uvrščen pod oznaki KN ex73072310 in ex73072390.
Following the additional disclosure, two Chinese exporting producers and CCCMC reiterated their claim regarding the period considered for the injury trends.
Zadevni izdelek se izdeluje predvsem z rezanjem in oblikovanjem cevi.
As stated above it is the standard practice of the Commission to use a 4-year period for its injury assessment, on the basis of its wide discretion in trade defence investigations.
Uporablja se za spajanje cevi iz nerjavnega jekla ter obstaja v različnih oblikah, kot so kolena, T-kosi, redukcije in kapice.
Furthermore the interested parties did not submit any compelling evidence that would have required the Commission to deviate from its standard practice.
Zadevni izdelek se uporablja v različnih potrošniških industrijah in končnih aplikacijah.
Furthermore the case [5] the interested parties are referred to was terminated by the withdrawal of the complaint.
Primeri take uporabe so:
Therefore no injury determination was made in that case.
petrokemična industrija;
Furthermore, the product concerned of this investigation differs from the product concerned of the terminated investigation.
industrija pijač ter živilskopredelovalna in farmacevtska industrija;
Therefore this claim was rejected.
ladjedelništvo;
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
proizvodnja energije, elektrarne;
Product concerned
gradbeništvo in industrijske napeljave.
The product subject to this investigation is tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, of austenitic stainless steel grades, corresponding to AISI types 304, 304L, 316, 316L, 316Ti, 321 and 321H and their equivalent in the other norms, with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm and a wall thickness of 16 mm or less, with a roughness not less than 0,8 micrometres, not flanged, whether or not finished, originating in the PRC and Taiwan.
Po dokončnem razkritju je eden od uvoznikov Unije trdil, da kapice ne bi smele biti vključene v obseg izdelka, ker se ne izdelujejo z rezanjem in oblikovanjem cevi.
The product falls under CN codes ex73072310 and ex73072390.
V odgovor na to trditev je treba opozoriti, da se zadevni izdelek izdeluje „predvsem“, vendar ne „izključno“ z rezanjem in oblikovanjem cevi.
The product concerned is manufactured essentially by cutting and forming tubes and pipes.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da so s tržnega vidika kapice vrsta pribora (fitingov) in so kot take predstavljene v katalogih družb.
The product concerned is used to join pipes and tubes of stainless steel and exist in different shapes such as elbows, reducers, tees and caps.
Po dokončnem razkritju je več strani trdilo, da uvoženi izdelki in proizvodnja Unije v tehničnem smislu niso medsebojno zamenljivi zaradi različnih tehničnih standardov, tj. EN/DIN in ASME/ANSI, oziroma da bi bilo treba izdelke, proizvedene v skladu s standardi EN/DIN, izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
The product concerned is used in a wide range of consumer industries and final applications.
Prvič, pomembno je pojasniti, da industrija Unije in tudi proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so predmet preiskave, proizvajajo izdelke v skladu z obema vrstama tehničnih standardov.
Examples of these are:
To velja tudi za vzorčene družbe.