natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The above-quoted Directives contain special rules on readmission between Member States in cases of intra-EU mobility of certain categories of third-country nationals (intra-corporate transfers, holders of EU Blue Cards, long-term residents).
Odobritev 60 dni za splošno pravilo bi bila nezdružljiva z usklajevanjem in skupno disciplino, ki ju zagotavlja direktiva o vračanju s časovnim okvirom od sedem do trideset dni, zato je torej ni mogoče utemeljiti kot ugodnejšo določbo v skladu s členom 4(3).
These provisions are to be considered as leges speciales (more specific rules) which have to be followed in the first place in those cases expressly covered by the said Directives.
Obdobja od 30 do 60 dni (ki presegajo okvir, usklajen z odstavkom 1), ki se lahko odobrijo samo v primeru posebnih okoliščin (navedene v odstavku 2), pa so zajeta v člen 7(2) direktive o vračanju.
Legal basis: Return Directive — Article 7(1)
V skladu z zahtevami, ki izhajajo iz pravice osebe, da se izjasni, iz člena 41(2) Listine, bi morale države članice osebi v postopku vračanja zagotoviti možnost, da navede posamezne okoliščine in potrebe, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri določanju obdobja, ki se bo odobrilo, tako v primerih, ko se obdobje za prostovoljni odhod opredeli po uradni dolžnosti, kot tudi v primerih, ko se to obdobje določi na podlagi prošnje osebe v postopku vračanja.
A return decision shall provide for an appropriate period for voluntary departure of between seven and thirty days, without prejudice to the exceptions referred to in paragraphs 2 and 4.
Čeprav direktiva o vračanju prepoveduje prisilno vračanje nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav v obdobju za prostovoljni odhod, državam članicam ne preprečuje, da v tem obdobju začnejo potrebne upravne postopke glede na morebitno izvršitev odločbe o vrnitvi (na primer vzpostavitev stikov z organi tretjih držav za pridobitev potovalnih dokumentov, organiziranje logistike za operacijo odstranitve).
Member States may provide in their national legislation that such a period shall be granted only following an application by the third-country national concerned.
Na podlagi posamezne ocene položaja državljana tretje države in zlasti ob upoštevanju možnosti vrnitve in pripravljenosti državljana tretje države za sodelovanje s pristojnimi organi Komisija državam članicam priporoča, naj odobrijo najkrajše obdobje za prostovoljni odhod, ki je potrebno za organizacijo in izvedbo vrnitve.
In such a case, Member States shall inform the third-country nationals concerned of the possibility of submitting such an application.
Obdobje, ki je daljše od sedmih dni, bi bilo treba odobriti samo, kadar državljan tretje države dejavno sodeluje v postopku vračanja.
The promotion of voluntary departure is one of the key objectives of the Return Directive.
Pravna podlaga: direktiva o vračanju – člen 7(2)
Unless there are reasons to conclude that this would undermine the purpose of return, voluntary departure in compliance with an obligation to return is preferable to removal for the threefold reason that it is a more dignified, safer and frequently more cost-effective return option.
Države članice lahko, kadar je to potrebno, obdobje za prostovoljni odhod podaljšajo za ustrezno obdobje, ob upoštevanju posebnih okoliščin posameznega primera, kot so dolžina prebivanja, šoloobvezni otroci ter druge družinske in socialne vezi.
During the period for voluntary departure, the third-country national concerned is under the obligation to return, although this obligation cannot be enforced until the expiry of such period, or if a risk of absconding or a risk to public policy, public security or national security emerge, or an application for legal stay is dismissed as manifestly unfounded or fraudulent (see section 6.3).
Ni vnaprej določenega najdaljšega roka za podaljšanje obdobja za prostovoljni odhod in treba je obravnavati vsak posamezni primer posebej v skladu z nacionalno izvedbeno zakonodajo in upravno prakso.
Member States are encouraged to provide the possibility of voluntary departure to the largest possible number of returnees and to refrain from doing so in those cases in which there is a risk that this might hamper the purpose of the return procedure.
Države članice imajo široko polje proste presoje pri odločanju, ali bi bilo podaljšanje obdobja za prostovoljni odhod „ustrezno“.
The last sentence of Article 7(1) allows Member States to decide to subject access to a period for voluntary departure to an application by the third-country nationals.
Ob upoštevanju, da so v besedilu omenjeni šoloobvezni otroci, se podaljšanje obdobja za prostovoljni odhod lahko odobri do konca semestra ali šolskega leta ali za obdobje do enega šolskega leta, če je to v največjo korist otroka in če se ustrezno upoštevajo vse relevantne okoliščine primera.
Such information should be provided to minors in a child-sensitive and age- and context-appropriate manner, and particular attention should be paid to the situation of unaccompanied minors.
Izraz „kadar je to potrebno“ se nanaša tako na okoliščine osebe v postopku vračanja kot na okoliščine države, ki izvaja vrnitev.
Member States may also decide to grant a period for voluntary departure upon application for certain categories of illegally staying third-country nationals (for example those whose application for legal stay is rejected as manifestly unfounded or fraudulent) or for or obtaining support (for instance reintegration assistance), and to grant it without prior application in other cases.
Države članice lahko same odločajo o vsebini in regulativnem obsegu svoje nacionalne izvedbene zakonodaje na tem področju.
The Commission recommends granting a period for voluntary departure following a request by the third-country nationals concerned, while ensuring that the necessary information for submitting an application is duly and systematically provided to the third-country nationals.
V nacionalni izvedbeni zakonodaji in upravni praksi je treba izrecno upoštevati tri podprimere, omenjene v členu 7(2) (dolžina prebivanja, šoloobvezni otroci in družinske vezi).
Assisted voluntary return programmes: while the Return Directive does not require Member States to establish an assisted voluntary return programme, its recital 10 affirms that ‘in order to promote voluntary return, Member States should provide for enhanced return assistance and counselling and make best use of relevant funding possibilities’.
Upravni predpisi držav članic so lahko podrobnejši in opredeljujejo tudi druge razloge za podaljšanje, ne morejo pa biti manj podrobni, saj bi to nasprotovalo usklajevanju.
Member States are therefore strongly encouraged to make assisted voluntary return programmes available throughout the procedures, as part of the efforts to promote a more humane and dignified return and, in general, to increase the effectiveness of return.
Pravna podlaga: direktiva o vračanju – člen 7(3)
To facilitate access to such schemes and to ensure that an informed decision is taken by the third-country nationals concerned, Member States should ensure adequate dissemination of information on voluntary return and assisted voluntary return programmes, also in cooperation with national authorities who may be in direct contact with third-country nationals (for example education, social and health services), non-governmental organisations and other bodies.
V obdobju za prostovoljni odhod se lahko naložijo določene obveznosti, namenjene preprečevanju nevarnosti pobega, kot so redno javljanje organom, položitev ustrezne finančne garancije, predložitev dokumentov ali obveznost zadrževanja na določenem mestu.
When providing such information to minors, this should be done in a child-sensitive and age- and context- appropriate manner.
Obveznosti, naštete v členu 7(3) direktive o vračanju, se lahko naložijo, kadar je treba preprečiti nevarnost pobega.
National programmes should follow the Non-binding Common Standards for Assisted Voluntary Return (and Reintegration) Programmes implemented by Member States [39] developed by the Commission in cooperation with the Member States, and endorsed by the JHA Council in its Conclusions of 9-10 June 2016 [40].
Treba je opozoriti na to, da lahko možnost držav članic, da naložijo določene obveznosti, pomeni prednost za osebo v postopku vračanja, saj lahko omogoči odobritev obdobja za prostovoljni odhod tudi v primerih, ki se sicer ne bi tako obravnavali.
The Return Expert Group (REG) of the European Migration Network (EMN) aims at facilitating improved practical cooperation among States and stakeholders in the field of return, assisted voluntary return and reintegration programmes.
Splošno uporabnega zneska, ki bi pomenil „ustrezno finančno garancijo“, ni mogoče opredeliti.
It should be a key tool for the gathering and sharing of information and Member States are encouraged to make active use of it.
V vsakem primeru pa je treba spoštovati načelo sorazmernosti, in sicer bi bilo pri določanju zneska treba upoštevati individualni položaj osebe v postopku vračanja.
The time frame of 7-30 days constitutes a general principle.
Trenutna praksa v državah članicah predvideva zneske od približno 200 do 5000 evrov.
It is binding for Member States to fix a period which respects this frame, unless specific circumstances of the individual case justify an extension in accordance with Article 7(2) of the Return Directive (see section 6.1).
Če to zahteva posamezni primer, lahko države članice naložijo tudi več obveznosti iz člena 7(3) hkrati.
Granting 60 days as a general rule would be incompatible with the harmonisation and common discipline provided for by the Return Directive to have a frame of 7-30 days, therefore it cannot be justified as more favourable provision under Article 4(3).
Pri nalaganju obveznosti v skladu s členom 7(3) bi morale države članice upoštevati individualni položaj osebe v postopku vračanja in zagotoviti popolno spoštovanje načela sorazmernosti.
However, periods between 30-60 days (exceeding the range harmonised by paragraph 1) which may be granted only in the presence of specific circumstances (referred to in paragraph 2) are covered by Article 7(2) of the Return Directive.
Države članice se izogibajo nalaganju obveznosti, ki jih dejansko ni mogoče izpolniti (na primer če oseba nima potnega lista, ga tudi ne bo mogla predložiti).
In line with the requirements deriving from the right to be heard, as recognised Article 41(2) CFR, Member States should provide the returnee with a possibility to specify individual circumstances and needs to be taken into account when determining the period to be granted, both in cases where the period for voluntary departure is determined ex officio and in cases in which the period is fixed following an application by the returnee.
Pravna podlaga: direktiva o vračanju – člen 7(4)
Although the Return Directive prohibits to forcibly return an illegally staying third-country national during the period for voluntary departure, it does not prevent Member States from launching the necessary administrative procedures during that period in view of the possible enforcement of a return decision (for example establishing contacts with the authorities of third countries for obtaining travel documents, organising the logistics for the removal operation).
Če obstaja nevarnost pobega ali če je bila vloga za zakonito prebivanje zavrnjena kot očitno neutemeljena ali lažna ali če zadevna oseba ogroža javni red, javno varnost ali državno varnost, se države članice lahko vzdržijo odobritve obdobja za prostovoljni odhod ali odobrijo obdobje, krajše od sedmih dni.
Based on an individual assessment of the situation of the third-country national, and taking particularly into account the prospect of return and the willingness of the third-country national to cooperate with the competent authorities, the Commission recommends that Member States grant the shortest period for voluntary departure that is needed to organise and carry out the return.
Države članice se lahko v primerih, ki so izčrpno našteti v členu 7(4) direktive o vračanju in v katerih obstajajo „nasprotni dokazi“, na primer ko v zvezi z državljanom tretje države obstaja nevarnost pobega (glej oddelek 1.6) ali ogrožanje javnega reda, javne varnosti ali nacionalne varnosti (na primer predhodne obsodbe za huda kazniva dejanja, storjena tudi v drugih državah članicah) ali ko je bila vloga za zakonito prebivanje (na primer prošnja za azil, prošnja za izdajo ali podaljšanje dovoljenja) zavrnjena kot očitno neutemeljena ali lažna, vzdržijo odobritve obdobja za prostovoljni odhod.
A period longer than seven days should be granted only when the third-country national actively cooperates in the return process.
Če je na podlagi posamezne ocene mogoče ugotoviti, da taki „nasprotni dokazi“ obstajajo v posameznem primeru, se obdobje za prostovoljni odhod ne bi smelo odobriti, obdobje, krajše od sedmih dni, pa bi se lahko odobrilo samo, če to nacionalnim organom ne preprečuje izvedbe odstranitve.
Legal basis: Return Directive — Article 7(2)
Države članice pa lahko svojo oceno okoliščin (oseba v postopku vračanja, ki prej ni sodelovala, lahko spremeni svoj pristop in sprejme ponudbo za pomoč pri prostovoljnem vračanju) kadar koli spremenijo ter odobrijo obdobje za prostovoljni odhod kljub začetni nevarnosti pobega.
Member States shall, where necessary, extend the period for voluntary departure by an appropriate period, taking into account the specific circumstances of the individual case, such as the length of stay, the existence of children attending school and the existence of other family and social links.
Možnosti odobritve obdobja za prostovoljni odhod ni mogoče na splošno izključiti za vse osebe, ki nezakonito vstopijo na ozemlje države članice.
There is no pre-fixed maximum time limit for the extension of the period for voluntary departure and each individual case should be treated on its own merits in accordance with national implementing legislation and administrative practice.
Tako posplošujoče pravilo bi nasprotovalo opredelitvi pojma nevarnost pobega, načelu sorazmernosti in obveznosti, da se izvede ocena za vsak posamezni primer, ter bi ogrozilo polni učinek člena 7 (spodbujanje prostovoljnega odhoda).
Member States enjoy a wide margin of discretion in determining whether the extension of the period for voluntary departure would be ‘appropriate’.
Iz člena 7(4) pa se lahko izvzamejo državljani tretjih držav, ki so z vlogo zlorabili postopek.
Taking into account the reference in the text to children attending school, extensions of the period for voluntary departure until the end of the semester or of the school year, or for up to one school year, may be granted provided that this is in the child's best interests and that all relevant circumstances of the case are duly taken into account.
Člen 7(4) izrecno zajema očitno neutemeljene ali lažne vloge.
An extension of the period beyond 30 days can be granted from the outset (the point of time when the return decision is issued), if justified by the individual assessment of the circumstances of the case.
Vloge, ki zlorabljajo postopek, običajno vključujejo višjo stopnjo nedopustnega vedenja kot pa očitno neutemeljene vloge, zato bi bilo treba člen 7(4) razlagati tako, kot da zajema tudi vloge, ki zlorabljajo postopek.
It is not necessary to first issue a 30-day period and to subsequently extend it.
Izvzamejo se lahko tudi osebe, ki ogrožajo javni red, javno varnost ali nacionalno varnost.
The term ‘where necessary’ refers to circumstances both in the sphere of the returnee and in the sphere of the returning State.
Glede tega je Sodišče v zadevi Zh. in O., C-554/13 [41], pojasnilo, da so države članice pretežno proste, da v skladu s svojimi nacionalnimi potrebami opredelijo pojem javnega reda.
Member States enjoy discretion relating to the substance and the regulatory depth of their national implementing legislation on this issue.
Pojem „nevarnost pobega“ je različen od pojma „ogrožanje javnega reda“.
Legal basis: Return Directive — Article 7(3)
Drugi dejavniki, kot so narava in teža dejanja, čas, ki je potekel od izvršitve tega dejanja, in vsaka okoliščina, ki se nanaša na utemeljenost suma kaznivega dejanja, ki se očita zadevnemu državljanu tretje države, so tudi pomembni pri oceni za vsak posamezni primer, ki jo je treba vedno izvesti.
Certain obligations aimed at avoiding the risk of absconding, such as regular reporting to the authorities, deposit of an adequate financial guarantee, submission of documents or the obligation to stay at a certain place may be imposed for the duration of the period for voluntary departure.
Priloga 39 k Schengenskemu priročniku „Standardni obrazec za priznavanje odločbe o vrnitvi za namene tranzita po kopnem“
The obligations set out in Article 7(3) of the Return Directive can be imposed where there is a risk of absconding to avoid.
Zemljevid sodelujočih držav članic (na voljo na spletišču EMM, v razdelku Posebne raziskave EMM (EMN Ad-Hoc Queries), tema: vrnitev (Theme: Return), 2015)
If the individual assessment of the case shows that there are no particular circumstances, such obligations are not justified — see judgment of the ECJ in Case C-61/11, El Dridi, paragraph 37: ‘It follows from Article 7(3) and (4) of that directive that it is only in particular circumstances, such as where there is a risk of absconding, that Member States may, first, require the addressee of a return decision to report regularly to the authorities, deposit an adequate financial guarantee, submit documents or stay at a certain place or, second, grant a period shorter than seven days for voluntary departure or even refrain from granting such a period’.
Opozorilo/razlaga: Oseba v postopku vračanja, ki namerava zapustiti ozemlje EU po kopnem v obdobju za prostovoljni odhod, nima nobenega veljavnega vizuma ali drugega dovoljenja za tranzit čez druge države članice v svojo državo vrnitve, zato tvega, da jo bo na poti prijela/ustavila policija in da bo tranzitna država članica zanjo izdala drugo odločbo o vrnitvi.
The Commission recommends that Member States use such possibility when there is a risk of absconding to avoid during the period for voluntary departure.
To nasprotuje cilju politike direktive o vračanju, in sicer zagotavljanju učinkovitega vračanja, tudi s prostovoljnimi odhodi.
Attention should be paid to the fact that the possibility for Member States to impose certain obligations may be an advantage for the returnee since it may allow the grant of a period for voluntary departure in cases which would not normally otherwise qualify for such treatment.
Izdaja tranzitnega vizuma za osebo v postopku vračanja bi bila neustrezna in neprimerna rešitev, saj je odobritev vizuma državljanom tretjih držav, ki na ozemlju EU prebivajo nezakonito in ga morajo zapustiti, v nasprotju s pravili EU o vizumih.
It is not possible to give a generally applicable figure of what amount constitutes an ‘adequate financial guarantee’.
Poleg tega se zdi, da nimajo tranzitne države članice nobenega razloga za izdajo takega vizuma (nevarnost pobega takih oseb in/ali stroški odstranitve), zato bi v praksi pogosto zavrnile izdajo vizuma.
In any case the proportionality principle should be respected, that is to say the amount should take into account the individual situation of the returnee.
Zagotovitev „evropske prepustnice“ za osebo v postopku vračanja tudi ni rešitev.
Current Member State practice foresees amounts varying from around EUR 200 to EUR 5000.
Če pravna narava in pravni učinki take „prepustnice“ niso jasno opredeljeni, se oseba v postopku vračanja z izključno pravnega vidika še vedno lahko obravnava, kot da v tranzitni državi članici prebiva nezakonito, in se bo zanjo morda izdala nova odločba o vrnitvi v skladu s členom 6(1).
If that is required in an individual case, the obligations mentioned in Article 7(3) can also be imposed in a cumulative manner.
Ena rešitev te težave je spodbujanje neposredne vrnitve v tretje države po zračni poti.
When imposing obligations under Article 7(3), Member States should take into account the individual situation of the returnee and ensure full respect of the proportionality principle.
To pa je lahko za osebo v postopku vračanja drago in nepraktično.
Member States shall avoid imposing obligations which can de facto not be complied with (for example if a person does not possess a passport, he/she will not be able to submit it).
Pristop, ki ga Komisija izrecno priporoča, je, da tranzitne države članice priznajo odločbe o vrnitvi, ki jih izda prva država članica v skladu s Prilogo 39 k Schengenskemu priročniku „Standardni obrazec za priznavanje odločbe o vrnitvi za namene tranzita po kopnem“ (ki jo je septembra 2011 izdala Komisija po posvetovanjih z zadevnimi državami članicami na tehnični ravni ter razpravah z delovno skupino Sveta Evropske unije za migracije in izgon).
Legal basis: Return Directive — Article 7(4)
V skladu s tem pristopom lahko tranzitna država članica prizna odločbo o vrnitvi, vključno z obdobjem za prostovoljni odhod, ki ga je odobrila prva država članica, in omogoči osebi v postopku vračanja tranzit na podlagi priznane odločbe in priznanega obdobja za prostovoljni odhod.
If there is a risk of absconding, or if an application for a legal stay has been dismissed as manifestly unfounded or fraudulent, or if the person concerned poses a risk to public policy, public security or national security, Member States may refrain from granting a period for voluntary departure, or may grant a period shorter than seven days.
Ta pristop ima to prednost, da tranzitni državi članici ni treba izdati nove odločbe o vrnitvi in lahko prosi prvo državo članico, da ji povrne vse stroške, povezane z odstranitvijo, če se pojavijo težave in je treba osebo v postopku vračanja odstraniti na stroške tranzitne države (pri čemer se uporabi Odločba Sveta 2004/191/ES [42]).Tiste države članice, ki še vedno niso prepričane o uporabi te prostovoljne možnosti (kot države članice pošiljateljice ali prejemnice), se spodbujajo, da začnejo sodelovati ter o tem obvestijo Komisijo in druge države članice.
Member States are free to refrain from granting a period for voluntary departure in those cases — exhaustively listed in Article 7(4) of the Return Directive — in which there is a ‘counter-indication’, i.e. when the third-country national poses a risk of absconding (see section 1.6) or a risk to public order, public security or national security (for example previous convictions for serious criminal offences committed also in other Member States), and when a request for legal stay (for example asylum application, request or renewal of permit) has been dismissed as manifestly unfounded or fraudulent.
Oblika priznavanja: zelo široko in splošno besedilo Direktive 2001/40/ES dopušča, da se lahko države same odločajo o praktičnih načinih (podrobnostih o postopkih) medsebojnega priznavanja v skladu s potrebami v praksi in nacionalno zakonodajo.
When, on the basis of an individual assessment, it can be established that such ‘counter-indications’ exist in a specific case, a period for voluntary departure should not be granted and a period shorter than 7 days should be granted only if it does not prevent national authorities from carrying out removal.
Obrazec, ki je predlagan v Prilogi 39 k Schengenskemu priročniku, je eden od možnih, ne pa edini način za izvedbo postopka.
Member States may, however, change their assessment of the situation at any moment (a previously non-cooperating returnee may change attitude and accept an offer for assisted voluntary return) and grant a period for voluntary departure even though there was initially a risk of absconding.
S pravnega vidika država članica B prizna vse pomembne elemente odločbe o vrnitvi, ki jo izda država članica A, vključno s priznavanjem izjave, da državljan tretje države prebiva nezakonito in da je zanj bilo odobreno obdobje za prostovoljni odhod, ki ima učinek tudi na ozemlju države članice B, ki priznava to odločbo.
It is not possible to exclude in general all illegal entrants from the possibility of obtaining a period for voluntary departure.
Država članica, ki priznava odločbo, ima na voljo tri različne „varovalne ukrepe“: