natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Without prejudice to Article 29, the investigation measures set out in paragraph 1 of this Article may be subject to conditions in accordance with the applicable national law if the national law contains specific restrictions that apply with regard to certain categories of persons or professionals who are legally bound by an obligation of confidentiality.
zagotovitev predložitve shranjenih računalniških podatkov, ki so lahko šifrirani ali dešifrirani ter v izvirni obliki ali drugi posebej določeni obliki, vključno s podatki o bančnem računu in prometu, z izjemo podatkov, ki se izrecno zadržijo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom na podlagi drugega stavka člena 15(1) Direktive 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [20];
The investigation measures set out in points(c), (e) and (f) of paragraph 1 of this Article may be subject to further conditions, including limitations, provided for in the applicable national law.
začasno zavarovanje predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, ali premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, vključno s sredstvi, za katere se pričakuje, da jih bo zaseglo sodišče prve stopnje, če obstaja razlog za domnevo, da bo lastnik, posestnik ali upravitelj teh predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, ali te premoženjske koristi poskušal preprečiti izvršitev odredbe o zasegu;
In particular, Member States may limit the application of points (e) and (f) of paragraph 1 of this Article to specific serious offences.
prestrezanje vhodnih in izhodnih elektronskih komunikacij osumljenca ali obdolženca prek vseh sredstev elektronske komunikacije, ki jih uporablja osumljenec ali obdolženec;
A Member State intending to make use of such limitation shall notify the EPPO of the relevant list of specific serious offences in accordance with Article 117.
iskanje in sledenje predmetu s tehničnimi sredstvi, vključno z nadzorovanimi pošiljkami blaga.
The European Delegated Prosecutors shall be entitled to request or to order any other measures in their Member State that are available to prosecutors under national law in similar national cases, in addition to the measures referred to in paragraph 1.
Brez poseganja v člen 29 lahko za preiskovalne ukrepe iz odstavka 1 tega člena veljajo pogoji v skladu z veljavnim nacionalnim pravom, če so v nacionalnem pravu določene posebne omejitve, ki se uporabljajo za posamezne kategorije oseb ali poklicev, ki so pravno zavezani obveznosti varovanja zaupnosti.
The European Delegated Prosecutors may only order the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 4 where there are reasonable grounds to believe that the specific measure in question might provide information or evidence useful to the investigation, and where there is no less intrusive measure available which could achieve the same objective.
Za preiskovalne ukrepe iz točk (c), (e) in (f) odstavka 1 tega člena lahko veljajo dodatni pogoji, vključno z omejitvami, določeni v veljavnem nacionalnem pravu.
The procedures and the modalities for taking the measures shall be governed by the applicable national law.
Države članice lahko zlasti omejijo uporabo točk (e) in (f) odstavka 1 tega člena na določena huda kazniva dejanja.
Article 31
Države članice, ki nameravajo uporabiti take omejitve, uradno obvestijo EJT o ustreznem seznamu določenih hudih kaznivih dejanj v skladu s členom 117.
Cross-border investigations
4.
The European Delegated Prosecutors shall act in close cooperation by assisting and regularly consulting each other in cross-border cases.
Evropski delegirani tožilci imajo pravico, da poleg ukrepov iz odstavka 1 v svojih državah članicah zahtevajo ali odredijo vse druge ukrepe, ki jih imajo na voljo tožilci po nacionalnem pravu v podobnih nacionalnih zadevah.
Where a measure needs to be undertaken in a Member State other than the Member State of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor, the latter European Delegated Prosecutor shall decide on the adoption of the necessary measure and assign it to a European Delegated Prosecutor located in the Member State where the measure needs to be carried out.
5.
The handling European Delegated Prosecutor may assign any measures, which are available to him/her in accordance with Article 30.
Evropski delegirani tožilci lahko ukrepe iz odstavkov 1 in 4 odredijo le, če obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za domnevo, da bi s zadevnim specifičnim ukrepom lahko pridobili informacije ali dokaze, ki bi koristili preiskavi, in če ni na voljo nobenega milejšega ukrepa, s katerim bi lahko dosegli isti cilj.
The justification and adoption of such measures shall be governed by the law of the Member States’ of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor.
Postopke in načine za sprejetje ukrepov ureja veljavno nacionalno pravo.
Where the handling European Delegated Prosecutor assigns an investigation measure to one or several European Delegated Prosecutors from another Member State, he/she shall at the same time inform his supervising European Prosecutor.
Člen 31
If judicial authorisation for the measure is required under the law of the Member State of the assisting European Delegated Prosecutor, the assisting European Delegated Prosecutor shall obtain that authorisation in accordance with the law of that Member State.
Čezmejne preiskave
If judicial authorisation for the assigned measure is refused, the handling European Delegated Prosecutor shall withdraw the assignment.
1.
However, where the law of the Member State of the assisting European Delegated Prosecutor does not require such a judicial authorisation, but the law of the Member State of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor requires it, the authorisation shall be obtained by the latter European Delegated Prosecutor and submitted together with the assignment.
Evropski delegirani tožilci tesno sodelujejo, tako da si v čezmejnih zadevah pomagajo in se redno posvetujejo.
The assisting European Delegated Prosecutor shall undertake the assigned measure, or instruct the competent national authority to do so.
Če je treba ukrep izvesti v državi članici, ki ni država članica evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo, ta evropski delegirani tožilec odloči o sprejetju potrebnega ukrepa in ga dodeli evropskemu delegiranemu tožilcu, ki se nahaja v državi članici, kjer je treba izvesti ukrep.
Where the assisting European Delegated Prosecutor considers that:
2.
the assignment is incomplete or contains a manifest relevant error;
Evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, lahko dodeli vsak ukrep, ki mu je na voljo v skladu s členom 30.
the measure cannot be undertaken within the time limit set out in the assignment for justified and objective reasons;
Utemeljitev in sprejetje takšnih ukrepov ureja pravo države članice evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo.
an alternative but less intrusive measure would achieve the same results as the measure assigned; or
Če evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, preiskovalni ukrep dodeli enemu ali več evropskim delegiranim tožilcem iz druge države članice, obenem o tem obvesti svojega nadzorujočega evropskega tožilca.
the assigned measure does not exist or would not be available in a similar domestic case under the law of his/her Member State,
Če je po pravu države članice pomočnika evropskega delegiranega tožilca za ukrep potrebna sodna odobritev, pomočnik evropskega delegiranega tožilca to odobritev pridobi v skladu s pravom navedene države članice.
he/she shall inform his supervising European Prosecutor and consult with the handling European Delegated Prosecutor in order to resolve the matter bilaterally.
Če je sodna odobritev za dodeljeni ukrep zavrnjena, evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, umakne dodelitev.
If the assigned measure does not exist in a purely domestic situation, but would be available in a cross-border situation covered by legal instruments on mutual recognition or cross-border cooperation, the European Delegated Prosecutors concerned may, in agreement with the supervising European Prosecutors concerned, have recourse to such instruments.
Če po pravu države članice pomočnika evropskega delegiranega tožilca takšna sodna odobritev ni potrebna, potrebna pa je v skladu s pravom države članice evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo, ta evropski delegirani tožilec pridobi odobritev in jo predloži skupaj z dodelitvijo.
If the European Delegated Prosecutors cannot resolve the matter within 7 working days and the assignment is maintained, the matter shall be referred to the competent Permanent Chamber.
Pomočnik evropskega delegiranega tožilca izvede dodeljeni ukrep ali naloži pristojnemu nacionalnemu organu, naj to stori.
The same applies where the assigned measure is not undertaken within the time limit set out in the assignment or within a reasonable time.
Če pomočnik evropskega delegiranega tožilca meni, da:
The competent Permanent Chamber shall to the extent necessary hear the European Delegated Prosecutors concerned by the case and then decide without undue delay, in accordance with applicable national law as well as this Regulation, whether and by when the assigned measure needed, or a substitute measure, shall be undertaken by the assisting European Delegated Prosecutor, and communicate this decision to the said European Delegated Prosecutors through the competent European Prosecutor.
je dodelitev nepopolna ali vsebuje očitno pomembno napako;
Article 32
ukrepa iz utemeljenih in objektivnih razlogov ni mogoče sprejeti v roku, določenem v okviru dodelitve;
Enforcement of assigned measures
bi z drugim, a milejšim ukrepom dosegli iste rezultate kot z dodeljenim ukrepom, ali
The assigned measures shall be carried out in accordance with this Regulation and the law of the Member State of the assisting European Delegated Prosecutor.
dodeljeni ukrep v podobni nacionalni zadevi po pravu njegove države članice ne obstaja oziroma ne bi bil na voljo,
Formalities and procedures expressly indicated by the handling European Delegated Prosecutor shall be complied with unless such formalities and procedures are contrary to the fundamental principles of law of the Member State of the assisting European Delegated Prosecutor.
o tem obvesti svojega nadzorujočega evropskega tožilca in se posvetuje z evropskim delegiranim tožilcem, ki obravnava zadevo, zaradi dvostranske rešitve vprašanja.
Article 33
Če dodeljeni ukrep v povsem nacionalnem primeru ne obstaja, bi pa bil na voljo v čezmejnem primeru, ki ga urejajo pravni instrumenti o vzajemnem priznavanju ali čezmejnem sodelovanju, lahko zadevni evropski delegirani tožilci v dogovoru z zadevnimi nadzorujočimi evropskimi tožilci uporabijo takšne instrumente.
Pre-trial arrest and cross-border surrender
Če evropski delegirani tožilci v sedmih delovnih dneh vprašanja ne morejo rešiti in se dodelitev ohrani, se vprašanje odstopi pristojnemu stalnemu senatu.
The handling European Delegated Prosecutor may order or request the arrest or pre-trial detention of the suspect or accused person in accordance with the national law applicable in similar domestic cases.
Enako velja, če se dodeljeni ukrep ne sprejme v roku, določenem v okviru dodelitve, ali v razumnem roku.
Where it is necessary to arrest and surrender a person who is not present in the Member State in which the handling European Delegated Prosecutor is located, the latter shall issue or request the competent authority of that Member State to issue a European Arrest Warrant in accordance with Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA [21].
Pristojni stalni senat po potrebi pridobi mnenja evropskih delegiranih tožilcev, ki jih primer zadeva, ter nato v skladu z veljavnim nacionalnim pravom in to uredbo nemudoma odloči, ali in do kdaj naj pomočnik evropskega delegiranega tožilca sprejme potrebni dodeljeni ukrep ali nadomestni ukrep, ter to odločitev prek pristojnega evropskega tožilca sporoči navedenim evropskim delegiranim tožilcem.
Rules on prosecution
Člen 32
Article 34
Izvrševanje dodeljenih ukrepov
Referrals and transfers of proceedings to the national authorities
Dodeljeni ukrepi se izvajajo v skladu s to uredbo in pravom države članice pomočnika evropskega delegiranega tožilca.
Where an investigation conducted by the EPPO reveals that the facts subject to investigation do not constitute a criminal offence for which it is competent under Articles 22 and 23, the competent Permanent Chamber shall decide to refer the case without undue delay to the competent national authorities.
Upoštevajo se formalnosti in postopki, ki jih izrecno navede evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, razen če so takšne formalnosti in postopki v nasprotju s temeljnimi pravnimi načeli države članice pomočnika evropskega delegiranega tožilca.
Where an investigation conducted by the EPPO reveals that the specific conditions for the exercise of its competence set out in Article 25(2) and (3) are no longer met, the competent Permanent Chamber shall decide to refer the case to the competent national authorities without undue delay and before initiating prosecution at national courts.
Člen 33
Where, with regard to offences which caused or are likely to cause damage to the financial interests of the Union of less than EUR 100000, the College considers that, with reference to the degree of seriousness of the offence or the complexity of the proceedings in the individual case, there is no need to investigate or to prosecute a case at Union level and that it would be in the interest of the efficiency of investigation or prosecution, it shall in accordance with Article 9(2), issue general guidelines allowing the Permanent Chambers to refer a case to the competent national authorities.
Prijetje v predkazenskem postopku in čezmejna predaja
Such guidelines shall also allow the Permanent Chambers to refer a case to the competent national authorities where the EPPO exercises a competence in respect of offences referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 3(2) of Directive (EU) 2017/1371 and where the damage caused or likely to be caused to the Union’s financial interests does not exceed the damage caused or likely to be caused to another victim.
1.
To ensure coherent application of the guidelines, each Permanent Chamber shall report annually to the College on the application of the guidelines.
Evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, lahko odredi ali zahteva prijetje osumljenca ali obdolženca ali njegovo pridržanje v predkazenskem postopku v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja v podobnih nacionalnih zadevah.
Such referrals shall also include any inextricably linked offences within the competence of the EPPO as referred to in Article 22(3).
Kadar sta potrebna prijetje in predaja osebe, ki ni navzoča v državi članici, v kateri se nahaja evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, slednji izda evropski nalog za prijetje ali zaprosi pristojni organ navedene države članice za njegovo izdajo v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2002/584/PNZ [21].
The Permanent Chamber shall communicate any decision to refer a case to national authorities on the basis of paragraph 3 to the European Chief Prosecutor.
Pravila o pregonu
Within 3 days of receiving of this information, the European Chief Prosecutor may request the Permanent Chamber to review its decision if the European Chief Prosecutor considers that the interest to ensure the coherence of the referral policy of the EPPO so requires.
Člen 34
Where the competent national authorities do not accept to take over the case in accordance with paragraph 2 and 3 within a timeframe of maximum 30 days, the EPPO shall remain competent to prosecute or dismiss the case, in accordance with the rules laid down in this Regulation.
Odstop zadeve in prenos postopka na nacionalne organe
Where the EPPO considers a dismissal in accordance with Article 39(3), and if the national authority so requires, the Permanent Chamber shall refer the case without delay to that authority.
Kadar preiskava, ki jo opravlja EJT, pokaže, da dejstva, ki so predmet preiskave, ne predstavljajo kaznivega dejanja, za katera je ETJ na podlagi členov 22 in 23 pristojno, pristojni stalni senat odloči, da se zadeva brez nepotrebnega odlašanja odstopi pristojnim nacionalnim organom.
If, following a referral in accordance with paragraph (1), (2) or (3) of this Article and Article 25(3), the national authority decides to open an investigation, the EPPO shall transfer the file to that national authority, refrain from taking further investigative or prosecutorial measures and close the case.
Kadar preiskava, ki jo opravlja EJT, pokaže, da posebni pogoji za izvajanje njegove pristojnosti iz člena 25(2) in (3) niso več izpolnjeni, pristojni stalni senat odloči, da se zadeva brez nepotrebnega odlašanja odstopi pristojnim nacionalnim organom še pred začetkom pregona pred nacionalnimi sodišči.
If a file is transferred in accordance with paragraph (1), (2) or (3) of this Article and Article 25(3), the EPPO shall inform the relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, as well as, where appropriate under national law, suspects or accused persons and the crime victims of the transfer.
Kadar v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, ki so povzročila ali bi lahko povzročila škodo finančnim interesom Unije v višini manj kot 100000 EUR, kolegij meni, da glede na težo kaznivega dejanja ali zapletenost postopka v posamezni zadevi ni potrebe za preiskavo ali pregon zadeve na ravni Unije in da bi bilo v interesu učinkovitosti preiskave ali pregona, v skladu s členom 9(2) izda splošne smernice, ki omogočajo stalnim senatom, da zadevo odstopijo pristojnim nacionalnim organom.
Article 35
Take smernice prav tako omogočijo stalnim senatom, da zadevo odstopijo pristojnim nacionalnim organom v primerih, kadar EJT izvaja pristojnost za kazniva dejanja iz točk (a) in (b) člena 3(2) Direktive (EU) 2017/1371, in kadar škoda, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena finančnim interesom Unije, ne presega škode, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena drugi žrtvi.
Termination of the investigation
Za zagotovitev usklajene uporabe smernic vsak stalni senat kolegiju letno poroča o njihovi uporabi.
When the handling European Delegated Prosecutor considers the investigation to be completed, he/she shall submit a report to the supervising European Prosecutor, containing a summary of the case and a draft decision whether to prosecute before a national court or to consider a referral of the case, dismissal or simplified prosecution procedure in accordance with Article 34, 39 or 40.
Takšni odstopi vključujejo tudi vsa neločljivo povezana kazniva dejanja, za katera je pristojno EJT, kot je določeno v členu 22(3).
The supervising European Prosecutor shall forward those documents to the competent Permanent Chamber accompanied, if he/she considers it to be necessary, by his/her own assessment.
Stalni senat o vsaki odločitvi, da zadevo odstopi nacionalnim organom na podlagi odstavka 3, obvesti evropskega glavnega tožilca.
When the Permanent Chamber, in accordance with Article 10(3), takes the decision as proposed by the European Delegated Prosecutor, he/she shall pursue the matter accordingly.
Evropski glavni tožilec lahko v treh dneh po prejemu te informacije zaprosi stalni senat za ponovno preučitev njegove odločitve, če evropski glavni tožilec meni, da je to potrebno zaradi zagotavljanja usklajene politike EJT glede odstopa.
If the Permanent Chamber, based on the reports received, considers that it will not take the decision as proposed by the European Delegated Prosecutor, it shall, where necessary, undertake its own review of the case file before taking a final decision or giving further instructions to the European Delegated Prosecutor.
Kadar pristojni nacionalni organi niso pripravljeni prevzeti zadeve v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3 v roku največ 30 dni, EJT obdrži pristojnosti za izvedbo pregona ali opustitev zadeve v skladu s pravili, določenimi v tej uredbi.
Where applicable, the report of the European Delegated Prosecutor shall also provide sufficient reasoning for bringing the case to judgment either at a court of the Member State where he/she is located, or, in accordance with Article 26(4) at a court of a different Member State which has jurisdiction over the case.
Kadar je po mnenju EJT opustitev zadeve v skladu s členom 39(3) in če tako zahteva nacionalni organ, stalni senat zadevo brez odlašanja odstopi navedenemu organu.
Article 36
Če se po odstopu v skladu z odstavkom 1, 2 ali 3 tega člena in členom 25(3) nacionalni organ odloči začeti preiskavo, EJT preda spis navedenemu nacionalnemu organu, ne sprejme več nobenih nadaljnjih preiskovalnih ali tožilskih ukrepov in zaključi zadevo.
Prosecution before national Courts
Če je spis predan v skladu z odstavkom 1, 2, ali 3 tega člena in členom 25(3), EJT o predaji obvesti ustrezne institucije, organe, urade in agencije Unije ter, kjer je to potrebno v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, osumljence ali obdolžence in žrtve kaznivega dejanja.
When the European Delegated Prosecutor submits a draft decision proposing to bring a case to judgment, the Permanent Chamber shall, following the procedures set out in Article 35, decide on this draft within 21 days.
Člen 35
The Permanent Chamber cannot decide to dismiss the case if a draft decision proposes bringing a case to judgment.
Zaključek preiskave
Where the Permanent Chamber does not take a decision within the 21-day time limits, the decision proposed by the European Delegated Prosecutor shall be deemed to be accepted.
Ko je po mnenju evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo, preiskava končana, nadzorujočemu evropskemu tožilcu predloži poročilo s povzetkom zadeve in osnutkom odločitve o morebitnem pregonu pred nacionalnim sodiščem ali o preučitvi možnosti odstopa zadeve, opustitve zadeve ali poenostavljenega postopka pregona v skladu s členi 34, 39 ali 40.
Where more than one Member State has jurisdiction over the case, the Permanent Chamber shall in principle decide to bring the case to prosecution in the Member State of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor.
Nadzorujoči evropski tožilec navedene dokumente posreduje pristojnemu stalnemu senatu in jim, če je to po njegovem mnenju potrebno, priloži lastno oceno.
However, the Permanent Chamber may, taking into account the report provided in accordance with Article 35(1), decide to bring the case to prosecution in a different Member State, if there are sufficiently justified grounds to do so, taking into account the criteria set out in Article 26(4) and (5), and instruct a European Delegated Prosecutor of that Member State accordingly.
Če stalni senat v skladu s členom 10(3) sprejme odločitev, ki jo predlaga evropski delegirani tožilec, slednji ustrezno dalje postopa.
Before deciding to bring a case to judgment, the competent Permanent Chamber may, on the proposal of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor, decide to join several cases, where investigations have been conducted by different European Delegated Prosecutors against the same person(s) with a view to prosecuting these cases in the courts of a single Member State which, in accordance with its law, has jurisdiction for each of those cases.
Če stalni senat na podlagi prejetih poročil ne namerava sprejeti odločitve, ki jo predlaga evropski delegirani tožilec, po potrebi sam pregleda spis, preden sprejme končno odločitev ali da nadaljnja navodila evropskemu delegiranemu tožilcu.
Once a decision on the Member State in which the prosecution shall be brought has been taken, the competent national court within that Member State shall be determined on the basis of national law.
Kadar je primerno, evropski delegirani tožilec v poročilu navede tudi ustrezno obrazložitev za vložitev obtožnice bodisi pri sodišču države članice, kjer se evropski delegirani tožilec nahaja, ali v skladu s členom 26(4) pri sodišču druge države članice, ki ima pristojnost za zadevo.
Where necessary for the purposes of recovery, administrative follow-up or monitoring, the Central Office shall notify the competent national authorities, interested persons and the relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union of the decision to prosecute.
Člen 36