natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following the confirmation of the presence of HPAI on the territory of Zimbabwe and in order to prevent the introduction of the HPAI virus into the Union, imports of biltong/jerky and pasteurised meat products consisting of or containing meat of poultry, farmed feathered game, ratites and wild game birds from Zimbabwe should be authorised, but subject to such commodities having undergone the specific treatment ‘D’ as set out in Part 4 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC.
Po potrditvi prisotnosti visokopatogene aviarne influence na ozemlju Zimbabveja in da bi se preprečil vnos virusa visokopatogene aviarne influence v Unijo, bi bilo treba sicer dovoliti uvoz na soncu sušenih mesnih rezin (biltong) in pasteriziranih mesnih izdelkov, ki so sestavljeni iz mesa perutnine, gojene pernate divjadi, ratitov in divjih ptic ali ga vsebujejo, iz Zimbabveja v Unijo, vendar pod pogojem, da je bilo tako blago obdelano s posebno obdelavo „D“, kot je določena v delu 4 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES.
Parts 2 and 3 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Dela 2 in 3 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES se spremenita v skladu s Prilogo k temu sklepu.
in Part 2, the following entry for Bosnia and Herzegovina is inserted between the entry for Australia and the entry for Bahrain:
v delu 2 se med vnosa za Avstralijo in Bahrajn vstavi naslednji vnos za Bosno in Hercegovino:
Domestic rabbit and farmed leporidae
Divja parkljasta divjad (razen prašičev)
Wild cloven-hoofed game (excluding swine)
Divji prašiči
Wild swine
Divji enoprsti kopitarji
Wild soliped
Divji leporidi (kunci in zajci)
Wild leporidae (rabbits and hares)
Divje ptice
Wild game birds
Divji kopenski sesalci (razen parkljarjev, kopitarjev in leporidov)
Wild land mammalian (excluding ungulates, solipeds and leporidae)
Bosna in Hercegovina (3)
Bosnia and Herzegovina (3)
XXX“;
XXX’;
v delu 2 se vnos za nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo nadomesti z naslednjim:
in Part 2, the entry for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is replaced by the following:
nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija (**)
former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (**)
v delu 2 se vnos za Južno Afriko nadomesti z naslednjim:
in Part 2, the entry for South Africa is replaced by the following:
Južna Afrika
South Africa
v delu 2 se vnos za Zimbabve nadomesti z naslednjim:
in Part 2, the entry for Zimbabwe is replaced by the following:
Zimbabve (1)
Zimbabwe (1)
v delu 3 se vnos za Južno Afriko nadomesti z naslednjim:
in Part 3, the entry for South Africa is replaced by the following:
Gojena pernata divjad
Farmed feathered game
Ratiti
Ratites
Južna Afrika ZA-1
South Africa ZA-1
v delu 3 se vnos za Zimbabve nadomesti z naslednjim:
in Part 3, the entry for Zimbabwe is replaced by the following:
Zimbabve
Zimbabwe
XXX“.
XXX’.
Gojena pernata divjad (razen ratitov)
Farmed feathered game (except ratites)
Gojeni ratiti
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1462
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/1462
on recognition of the ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o potrditvi prostovoljnega sistema „REDcert“ za dokazljivo skladnost s trajnostnimi merili iz direktiv 98/70/ES in 2009/28/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC [1], and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 7c(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 98/70/ES z dne 13. oktobra 1998 o kakovosti motornega bencina in dizelskega goriva ter spremembi Direktive 93/12/EGS [1] in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 7c(4) Direktive,
Having regard to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC [2], and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 18(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/28/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o spodbujanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov, spremembi in poznejši razveljavitvi direktiv 2001/77/ES in 2003/30/ES [2] in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 18(4) Direktive,
Articles 7b and 7c of, and Annex IV to, Directive 98/70/EC and Articles 17 and 18 of, and Annex V to, Directive 2009/28/EC lay down similar sustainability criteria for biofuels and bioliquids, and similar procedures for the verification of compliance with those criteria.
Člena 7b in 7c ter Priloga IV k Direktivi 98/70/ES ter člena 17 in 18 ter Priloga V k Direktivi 2009/28/ES določajo podobna trajnostna merila za biogoriva in tekoča biogoriva ter podobne postopke za preverjanje skladnosti z navedenimi merili.
Where biofuels and bioliquids are to be taken into account for the purposes referred to in Article 17(1)(a), (b) and (c) of Directive 2009/28/EC, Member States must require economic operators to show the compliance of biofuels and bioliquids with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 17(2) to (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Kadar se biogoriva in tekoča biogoriva upoštevajo za namene iz člena 17(1)(a), (b) in (c) Direktive 2009/28/ES, morajo države članice od gospodarskih subjektov zahtevati, da dokažejo skladnost biogoriv in tekočih biogoriv s trajnostnimi merili iz člena 17(2) do (5) Direktive 2009/28/ES.
The Commission may decide that voluntary national or international schemes setting standards for the production of biomass products contain accurate data for the purposes of Article 17(2) of Directive 2009/28/EC, and/or demonstrate that consignments of biofuel or bioliquid comply with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 17(3), (4) and (5), and/or that no materials have been intentionally modified or discarded so that the consignment or part thereof would fall under Annex IX.
Komisija lahko odloči, da prostovoljni nacionalni ali mednarodni sistemi, ki določajo standarde za proizvodnjo proizvodov iz biomase, vsebujejo točne podatke za namene člena 17(2) Direktive 2009/28/ES in/ali dokazujejo, da so pošiljke biogoriva ali tekočega biogoriva skladne s trajnostnimi merili iz člena 17(3), (4) in (5) in/ali da noben material ni bil namerno spremenjen ali odložen, na podlagi česar bi pošiljka ali njen del spadala v Prilogo IX.
16, 53177 Bonn, Germany
Dokumenti potrjenega sistema bodo na voljo na platformi za preglednost, vzpostavljeni v skladu z Direktivo 2009/28/ES.
covers covers a wide range of feedstocks including wastes and residues and the entire chain of custody.
V oceni prostovoljnega sistema „REDcert“ je bilo ugotovljeno, da ustrezno upošteva trajnostna merila iz Direktive 98/70/ES in Direktive 2009/28/ES ter uporablja metodo masne bilance v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 7c(1) Direktive 98/70/ES in člena 18(1) Direktive 2009/28/ES.
The recognised scheme documents will be made available at the transparency platform established under Directive 2009/28/EC.
Ocena prostovoljnega sistema „REDcert“ je pokazala, da dosega ustrezne standarde zanesljivosti, preglednosti in neodvisne revizije ter izpolnjuje metodološke zahteve iz Priloge IV k Direktivi 98/70/ES in Priloge V k Direktivi 2009/28/ES.
Assessment of the ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme found it to cover adequately the sustainability criteria of Directive 98/70/EC and of Directive 2009/28/EC, as well as applying a mass balance methodology in line with the requirements of Article 7c(1) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 18(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za trajnost biogoriv in tekočih biogoriv –
The assessment of the ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme found that it meets adequate standards of reliability, transparency and independent auditing and also complies with the methodological requirements in Annex IV to Directive 98/70/EC and Annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on the Sustainability of Biofuels and Bioliquids,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Prostovoljni sistem „REDcert“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistem), ki je bil Komisiji predložen v potrditev 24. maja 2017, dokazuje, da so pošiljke biogoriv in tekočih biogoriv, proizvedenih v skladu s standardi za proizvodnjo biogoriv in tekočih biogoriv, ki so določeni v okviru sistema, skladne s trajnostnimi merili iz člena 7b(3), (4) in (5) Direktive 98/70/ES ter člena 17(3), (4) in (5) Direktive 2009/28/ES.
Article 1
Sistem vsebuje tudi točne podatke za namene člena 17(2) Direktive 2009/28/ES in člena 7b(2) Direktive 98/70/ES.
The ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme (hereinafter ‘the scheme’), submitted for recognition to the Commission on 24 May 2017, demonstrates that consignments of biofuels and bioliquids produced in accordance with the standards for the production of biofuels and bioliquids set in the scheme comply with the sustainability criteria as laid down in Article 7b(3), (4) and (5) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 17(3), (4) and (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Člen 2
The scheme also contains accurate data for the purposes of Article 17(2) of Directive 2009/28/EC and Article 7b(2) of Directive 98/70/EC.
Če se vsebina tega sistema, kakor je bil Komisiji predložen v potrditev 24. maja 2017, spremeni na način, ki bi lahko vplival na podlago tega sklepa, se o takih spremembah nemudoma obvesti Komisijo.
Article 2
Komisija oceni spremembe, o katerih je bila obveščena, in odloči, ali sistem še vedno zadostno upošteva trajnostna merila, za katera je bil potrjen.
If the contents of the scheme, as submitted for recognition to the Commission on 24 May 2017, change in a way that might affect the basis of this Decision, such changes shall be notified to the Commission without delay.
Člen 3
The Commission shall assess the notified changes with a view to establish whether the scheme is still adequately covering the sustainability criteria for which it is recognised.
Komisija lahko razveljavi ta sklep med drugim v naslednjih okoliščinah:
The Commission may repeal this Decision, inter alia, under the following circumstances:
če sistem Komisiji ne predloži letnih poročil na podlagi člena 7c(6) Direktive 98/70/ES in člena 18(6) Direktive 2009/28/ES;
if the scheme fails to submit annual reports to the Commission pursuant to Article 7c(6) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 18(6) of Directive 2009/28/EC;
Člen 4
Article 4
Uporablja se do 12. avgusta 2022.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 10. avgusta 2017
It shall apply until 12 August 2022.
Za Komisijo
Done at Brussels, 10 August 2017.
Predsednik
OJ L 350, 28.12.1998, p. 58.
Prošnja za potrditev, da prostovoljni sistem „REDcert“ dokazuje, da so pošiljke biogoriva skladne s trajnostnimi merili iz Direktive 98/70/ES in Direktive 2009/28/ES, je bila Komisiji prvič predložena 24. maja 2017.
The Economic Partnership Agreement between the CARIFORUM States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part [1] (the ‘CARIFORUM-EU EPA’) is applied provisionally as from 29 December 2008 between the European Union (EU) and Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, the Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Saint Christopher and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago.
Sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu med državami Cariforuma na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi strani [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum Cariforum-EU) se od 29. decembra 2008 začasno uporablja med Evropsko unijo (EU) ter državami Antigva in Barbuda, Bahami, Barbados, Belize, Dominika, Dominikanska republika, Grenada, Gvajana, Jamajka, Saint Kitts in Nevis, Sveta Lucija, Saint Vincent in Grenadine, Surinam ter Trinidad in Tobago.
On 10 March 2015 the CARIFORUM-EU Special Committee on Customs Cooperation and Trade Facilitation adopted Decision No 1/2015 [2] granting a derogation from the rules of origin with regard to certain textile products imported into the Union in accordance with Article 39(2) and Article 39(6)(b) of Protocol I to the EPA, from 10 March 2015 to 9 March 2017.
Posebni odbor Cariforum-EU za carinsko sodelovanje in olajševanje trgovine je 10. marca 2015 sprejel Sklep št. 1/2015 [2] o odstopanju od pravil o poreklu v zvezi z nekaterimi tekstilnimi izdelki, uvoženimi v Unijo v skladu s členom 39(2) in 39(6)(b) Protokola I k Sporazumu, od 10. marca 2015 do 9. marca 2017.
In order to permit the effective and full utilisation of the anticipated annual quota of exports, it is appropriate to provide for 180647 pieces yearly, which respects the ability of the existing industry to continue its exports to the Union.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2447 [3] določa pravila za upravljanje tarifnih kvot.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 [3] lays down rules for the management of tariff quotas.
Zaradi učinkovitega spremljanja izvajanja odstopanja bi morali organi Dominikanske republike Komisijo redno obveščati o izdanih potrdilih o gibanju blaga EUR.1 –
(in pieces)
Glede na informacije iz Dominikanske republike je izvoz izdelkov z oznako HS 6203.42, ki je bil zajet z odstopanjem, v obdobju od marca 2015 do marca 2016 obsegal 161634 kosov.
Men's or boys' trousers, breeches and shorts of denim
Količine, ki bodo odobrene za leti 2017 in 2018, bi morale biti v skladu s tem izkoristkom.
Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1470
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/1470
on State aid schemes SA.26763 2014/C (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France in favour of bus transport undertakings in the Île-de-France Region
o shemah pomoči SA.26763 2014/C (ex 2012/NN), ki jih je Francija izvedla v korist avtobusnih prevoznikov v regiji Île-de-France
(notified under document C(2017) 439)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2017) 439)
By letter of 7 October 2008, received on 17 October 2008, a complainant who wished to remain anonymous (‘the complainant’) lodged a complaint with the Commission against the Île-de-France Region (‘the Region’) for having had in place since 1994 an aid and subsidy scheme for certain transport undertakings in the region.
Pritožnik, ki je želel ostati anonimen (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) je z dopisom z dne 7. oktobra 2008, prejetim 17. oktobra 2008, pri Komisiji vložil pritožbo zoper regijo Île-de-France (v nadaljnjem besedilu: regija), ker je leta 1994 vzpostavila shemo pomoči in subvencij za nekatera prevozna podjetja v navedeni regiji.
By letter of 25 November 2008, the Commission sent the French authorities a request for information relating to the complaint.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 25. novembra 2008 francoskim organom poslala zahtevo za informacije v zvezi z navedeno pritožbo.
By letter of 13 January 2009, the French authorities asked the Commission to allow them extra time in which to reply to the Commission's questions.
Francoski organi so z dopisom z dne 13. januarja 2009 Komisijo zaprosili za podaljšanje roka za odgovor na vprašanja Komisije.
The time limit for replying was extended to 18 February 2009.
Pritožnik je z dopisi z dne 20. aprila, 2. septembra in 17. novembra 2010 Komisiji poslal dodatne informacije v zvezi z ukrepi, ki jih je odobrila regija.
The French authorities replied to the Commission's request for information on 26 February 2009.
Ker francoski organi niso prejeli zahteve za dodatne informacije, so z dopisom z dne 31. maja 2011 Komisijo prosili za pisno potrditev končanja postopka preiskave.
By letters of 20 April, 2 September and 17 November 2010, the complainant sent the Commission further information regarding the measures awarded by the Region.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 8. junija 2011 francoske organe pozvala, naj izrazijo svoje pripombe v zvezi z dodatnimi informacijami, ki jih je poslal pritožnik.
Having received no request for further information, the French authorities, by letter of 31 May 2011, asked the Commission for written confirmation that the investigation procedure had been closed.
Francoski organi kljub opominoma z dne 14. novembra 2011 in 29. februarja 2012 ter elektronskima sporočiloma z dne 22. septembra in 8. decembra 2011 niso odgovorili na zahtevo Komisije za informacije.
By letter of 8 June 2011, the Commission asked the French authorities to comment on the additional information supplied by the complainant.
Francoskim organom je bila 17. julija 2012 poslana nova zahteva za informacije.
The Commission sent reminders by letter on 14 November 2011 and 29 February 2012 and by email on 22 September and 8 December 2011, but did not receive any response.
Ker francoski organi niso odgovorili v določenem roku, jim je bil 25. septembra 2012 poslan opomin.
A further request for information was sent to the French authorities on 17 July 2012.
Tudi na tega niso odgovorili.
In the absence of a reply from the French authorities by the deadline, a reminder was sent to them by letter on 25 September 2012.
Komisija je 14. decembra 2012 sprejela odredbo o predložitvi informacij.
No reply was received to this letter either.
Francija je nepopoln odgovor predložila 22. januarja 2013 in se v njem obvezala, da bo Komisiji čim prej zagotovila izčrpen odgovor na vprašanja, postavljena v odredbi.
On 14 December 2012, the Commission issued an information injunction.
Komisija na dan sklepa o začetku postopka ni prejela dodatnih informacij.
France gave an incomplete reply on 22 January 2013 but undertook in the reply to come back to the Commission as soon as possible with a view to responding in full to the questions raised in the injunction decision.
Komisija je zato 11. marca 2014, ko še vedno ni prejela navedenih informacij, začela formalni postopek preiskave iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU).
By the date of its decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure, the Commission had not received any further information.
Ta sklep (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka) je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], v njem pa so bile tretje strani pozvane, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi z zadevnimi ukrepi.
On 11 March 2014, and without ever having received the said information, the Commission therefore initiated the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’).
Posredovala jih je Franciji in ji dala možnost, da v zvezi z njimi izrazi svoje pripombe.
France submitted its comments on 30 April 2014.
Komisija je 21. junija 2016 zunaj roka prejela skupno obvestilo štirih od sedmih zainteresiranih tretjih strani.
The Commission also received comments from seven interested third parties.
Z njim so želele pojasniti svoje stališče po tem, ko je Sodišče izdalo sodbo v zadevi Evropska komisija proti Jorgenu Andersenu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sodba Jorgen Andersen) [3].
The Commission forwarded them to France, giving France the opportunity to comment on them.
Nazadnje je svoje pripombe želela dopolniti regija, ki je 9. novembra 2016 poslala dodatno obvestilo.
By letter of 3 September 2014, France informed the Commission that it had no comment to make.
OZADJE IN PREDSTAVITEV UKREPOV V PREISKAVI
On 21 June 2016, outside the deadline, the Commission received a joint note from four of the seven interested third parties.
Samo v regiji Île-de-France, ki ima več kot 12 milijonov prebivalcev, živi 18,8 % vseh prebivalcev Francije, zaradi česar je to najbolj naseljena regija z največjo gostoto prebivalstva (996 preb./km2).
The purpose of this note was primarily to set out the position of the third parties concerned following the judgment by the Court in European Commission v Jørgen Andersen (‘the Jørgen Andersen judgment’) [3].
Po podatkih inštituta za urejanje prostora in urbanizem regije Île-de-France (Institut d'Aménagement et d'Urbanisme d'Île-de-France) [4] regija Île-de-France podira evropske prometne rekorde, saj je bilo leta 2010 v povprečju zabeleženih več kot 240000 vozil na dan na petih odsekih v regiji: treh odsekih predmestnega bulvarja, odseku avtoceste A1 in odseku avtoceste A4, kar zdaleč presega število vozil na najbolj obremenjenih odsekih londonske, berlinske ali milanske avtoceste.
Lastly, the Region added to its comments by sending a supplementary note on 9 November 2016.
Toda poleg neobičajnega stanja na nekaterih odsekih je celotno glavno omrežje obremenjeno z izjemno visokimi ravnmi prometa.
BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURES
Na vsaki drugi postaji omrežja, ki ga upravlja direkcija za ceste regije Île-de-France (Direction des routes d'Île-de-France), število vozil na dan in na cesto presega 18000, medtem ko se taka raven prometa na velikih državnih avtocestah preostale Francije šteje za značilno za zelo poslabšano stanje.
Île-de-France, with more than 12 million inhabitants, alone accounts for 18,8 % of the population of France, which makes it the most heavily and the most densely populated region of the country (996 inhabitants per sq. km).
V regiji Île-de-France se opravi približno 23 milijonov motoriziranih potovanj (kar je dve tretjini potovanj).
According to the Institut d'Aménagement et d'Urbanisme d'Île-de-France [4], Île-de-France holds the European records for traffic volumes, with an average of more than 240000 vehicles per day on five of its sections of road (three sections of the ring road, one section of the A1 and one of the A4), which greatly exceeds the load on the busiest stretches of the motorways in London, Berlin or Milan.
Več kot polovica se jih opravi z osebnimi avtomobili (vozni park šteje več kot štiri milijone avtomobilov) ali gospodarskimi vozili.
But even apart from the atypical situation on certain sections, the whole of the main network carries exceptionally high levels of traffic.
Preostala potovanja potekajo s sredstvi javnega prevoza.
One in two counting stations on the network run by the Île-de-France Road Directorate exceeds a figure of 18000 vehicles per day and per carriageway, although this level of traffic is considered characteristic of a very serious situation on the major national motorways in the rest of France.
Preobremenitev glavnega omrežja regije Île-de-France se kaže tudi s stalno gostim prometom: urni pretok pogosto ostaja na svoji najvišji ravni od 6. ure zjutraj do 9. ure zvečer, dnevni promet pa skoraj nespremenjen skozi vse leto.
23 million motorised journeys are made in Île-de-France (representing two thirds of journeys made).
Pri takih ravneh uporabe lahko majhne spremembe v prometu povzročijo zelo velike razlike v hitrostih in tok hitro spremenijo v zastoj.
More than half of these journeys are made using private vehicles (there are more than four million cars in the region) or utility vehicles.
Negativne posledice, povezane s takimi ravnmi preobremenjenosti, so očitne: onesnaževanje ozračja, izguba časa, večje število nesreč, izguba privlačnosti območja itd. V takih okoliščinah je razvoj privlačne ponudbe javnega prevoza nepogrešljiv za dosego trajnostne mobilnosti.
The remainder are made using public transport.
Temeljita preiskava Komisije se je nanašala na sistem podpore za naložbe podjetij za redni javni prevoz v cestnem prometu, ki so imela pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe v posebnem okviru regije Île-de-France, ki ga je treba upoštevati.
A sign of the over-use of the main network in Île-de-France is also the consistently heavy traffic: the hourly flow often stays at maximum level from 6 am to 9 pm, with daily throughput virtually stable throughout the year.
Ta sistem se je skozi čas razvijal glede na način organizacije rednega javnega prevoza v cestnem prometu v regiji Île-de-France, zaradi česar je Komisija razlikovala med dvema obdobjema:
At such levels of use, slight variations in vehicle numbers can lead to widely differing speeds and quickly result in congestion.
obdobjem 1994–2008, v katerem je regija subvencije za naložbe odobrila v zameno za podpis dodatka k pogodbam o izvajanju prevozov, ki so že bile sklenjene med prevoznim podjetjem in javno skupnostjo, in