natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The legal framework for the management of the fleet of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, which is based on the 2001 High Seas Act and 2003 High Seas Fishing Regulation, does not include a definition of IUU fishing activities.
V uvodnih izjavah 66 in 67 tega sklepa je dodatno opisana ocena posebnih razvojnih omejitev.
Furthermore, the current legal framework lacks a definition of serious infringements and a comprehensive list of serious offences to be addressed with proportionate severe sanctions.
Komisija na podlagi uvodnih izjav 19 do 31 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014 in razvoja dogodkov po tem datumu ter v skladu s členom 31(3) in členom 31(5)(a), (b), (c) in (d) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu meni, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine niso izpolnili dolžnosti v zvezi s prizadevanji za sodelovanje in izvrševanje, ki so jim bile kot državi zastave naložene z mednarodnim pravom.
Hence, the sanction system in its current form is not comprehensive and adequate in severity to achieve its deterrent function.
Neizvajanje mednarodnih pravil (člen 31(6) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu).
The treatment of infringements and serious infringements is not adequate to secure compliance, to discourage violations wherever they occur, and to deprive offenders of the benefits accruing from their illegal activities, as required by point 21 of the IPOA IUU and point 38 of the FAO Guidelines for Flag State Performance.
Komisija je, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 34 do 39 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, opravila analizo podatkov, ki jih šteje za pomembne in so na voljo v objavljenih podatkih regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva (RFMO), zlasti Mednarodne komisije za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku (ICCAT).
As highlighted in recitals 30 and 31 of the Decision of 12 December 2014, the level of development of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines cannot be considered as a factor undermining the capacity of the competent authorities to cooperate with other countries and pursue enforcement actions.
Komisija je po sprejetju Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014 opravila tudi analizo podatkov, ki jih šteje za pomembne v zvezi s statusom Saint Vincenta in Grenadin kot pogodbenice Mednarodne komisije za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku.
The evaluation of the specific constraints on the development is further described in recitals 66 to 67 of the present Decision.
Opozoriti je treba, da flota Saint Vincenta in Grenadin lovi tune in druge izrazito selivske vrste v območju Mednarodne komisije za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku.
In view of recitals 19 to 31 of the Decision of 12 December 2014 and the developments after 12 December 2014, the Commission takes the view, pursuant to Article 31(3) and Article 31(5)(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the IUU Regulation, that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has failed to discharge the duties incumbent upon it under international law as a flag State in respect of cooperation and enforcement efforts.
Pri tem bi morali Saint Vincent in Grenadine sodelovati z Mednarodno komisijo za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku, regionalno organizacijo za upravljanje ribištva, ki je pristojna za to območje in za navedene vrste.
Failure to implement international rules (Article 31(6) of the IUU Regulation)
Vendar pa država Saint Vincent in Grenadine kljub temu, da je pogodbenica Mednarodne komisije za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku, ne izpolnjuje obveznosti glede sprejetja ukrepov, potrebnih za ohranjanje živih virov odprtega morja, ki so ji kot državi zastave naložene s členom 117 konvencije UNCLOS v zvezi z njenimi državljani.
As described in the recitals 34 to 39 of the Decision of 12 December 2014, the Commission carried out an analysis on the information deemed relevant from available data published by Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs) and in particular by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT).
Mednarodna komisija za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku je, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 35 do 38, med letoma 2011 in 2013 na organe Saint Vincenta in Grenadin naslovila različne dopise.
In addition the Commission carried out an analysis on the information deemed relevant with respect to the status of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as a contracting Party to ICCAT following the Decision of 12 December 2014.
Po sprejetju Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014 je Mednarodna komisija za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku (ICCAT) leta 2016 organom Saint Vincenta in Grenadin ponovno poslala dopis o zaskrbljenosti, v katerem je poudarila pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene na srečanju ICCAT leta 2015, in sicer pozno predložitev (i) letnega poročila, (ii) načrta upravljanja mečarice v severnem Atlantiku in (iii) tabel o skladnosti.
It is to be noted that the fleet of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines targets tuna and other highly migratory species in the ICCAT area.
Mednarodna komisija za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku je v navedenem dopisu zaprosila Saint Vincenta in Grenadine tudi, naj predložijo dodatne informacije o tem, kako država izvaja priporočilo 12-05 ICCAT glede skladnosti z obstoječimi ukrepi za ohranjanje in upravljanje morskih psov.
In doing so, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines should cooperate with ICCAT, the RFMO competent in that area and for those species.
Mednarodna komisija za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku je sporočila, da na zadevne dopise o zaskrbljenosti ni bilo odgovora.
However, despite the fact that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is a contracting party to ICCAT, the country is not fulfilling the duty, incumbent upon it as a flag State in accordance with Article 117 of Unclos, to adopt, with respect to its nationals, measures for the conservation of the living resources of the high seas.
Saint Vincent in Grenadine tudi niso sprejeli nacionalnega akcijskega načrta za boj proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu, ki je priporočen v členu 25 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
As indicated in recitals 35 to 38, between 2011 and 2013 ICCAT issued various letters addressed to the authorities of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 39 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in ribištvo Saint Vincenta in Grenadin ne more zagotoviti dejanske povezave med državo in plovili, ki plujejo pod njeno zastavo, kot je zahtevano v členu 91 konvencije UNCLOS.
After the Decision of 12 December 2014, ICCAT submitted again in 2016 a letter of concern to the authorities of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines stressing the deficiencies identified in the ICCAT meeting in 2015, namely the late submission of (i) the annual report, (ii) the North Atlantic swordfish management plan and (iii) the compliance tables.
Komisija na podlagi uvodnih izjav 35 do 39 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014 in razvoja dogodkov po tem datumu ter v skladu s členom 31(3) in (6) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu meni, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine niso izpolnili svojih dolžnosti v zvezi z mednarodnimi pravili, predpisi ter ukrepi za ohranjanje in upravljanje, ki so jim bile naložene z mednarodnim pravom.
In that letter ICCAT also requested the authorities of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines to provide further information on the country's implementation of ICCAT Recommendation 12-05 on compliance with existing measures on shark conservation and management.
Posebne omejitve držav v razvoju (člen 31(7) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu)
Furthermore, ICCAT reported the lack of response to the letters of concern.
Opozoriti je treba, da Saint Vincent in Grenadine v skladu z indeksom človekovega razvoja ZN [8] veljajo za državo z visoko stopnjo človekovega razvoja (97. mesto med 188 državami).
Finally, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has not adopted a National Plan of Action to fight against IUU Fishing as recommended in point 25 of the IPOA IUU.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da so v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1905/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9] Saint Vincent in Grenadine uvrščeni v skupino držav in ozemelj z višjim srednjim dohodkom.
As indicated in recital 39 of the Decision of 12 December 2014, the Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is not in a position to ensure the genuine link between the State and the vessels flagged to the country as required by 91 of Unclos.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 42 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, ni bilo mogoče najti nobenih dokazov, ki bi potrdili, da so razvojne omejitve razlog za neizpolnjevanje dolžnosti, ki so bile Saint Vincentu in Grenadinam naložene z mednarodnim pravom.
In view of the recitals 35 to 39 of the Decision of 12 December 2014 and the subsequent developments, the Commission considers, pursuant to Article 31(3) and (6) of the IUU Regulation, that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has failed to discharge the duties incumbent upon it under international law with respect to international rules, regulations as well as conservation and management measures.
Prav tako ni dejanskih dokazov, ki bi ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti glede spremljanja, nadzora in obvladovanja ribolovnih dejavnosti povezali s pomanjkanjem zmogljivosti in infrastrukture.
Specific constraints of developing countries (Article 31(7) of the IUU Regulation)
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da organi Saint Vincenta in Grenadin niso preklicali nobene trditve glede razvojnih omejitev in so trdili, da je njihova uprava na splošno ustrezno učinkovita.
It is recalled that according to the United Nations Human Development Index [8], Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is considered as a high human development country (97th in 188 countries).
Komisija na podlagi uvodnih izjav 41, 42 in 43 Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014, razvoja dogodkov po tem datumu ter v skladu s členom 31(7) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu meni, da stopnja razvoja Saint Vincenta in Grenadin ne vpliva negativno na njihovo splošno ravnanje na področju ribolova.
It is also recalled that, according to Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9], Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is listed in the category of Upper Middle Income Countries and Territories.
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV O OPREDELITVI NESODELUJOČE TRETJE DRŽAVE
As described in recital 42 of the Decision of 12 December 2014, no corroborating evidence has been found to suggest that the failure of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines to discharge its duties under international law is the result of development constraints.
Na podlagi navedenih ugotovitev v zvezi z neizpolnjevanjem dolžnosti Saint Vincenta in Grenadin, ki so jim z mednarodnim pravom naložene kot državi zastave, pristanišča, obalni državi ali državi trga, ter nesprejetjem ukrepov za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje, bi bilo treba Saint Vincent in Grenadine v skladu s členom 31 uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu opredeliti kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu.
In the same manner, no concrete evidence exists to correlate the revealed shortcomings in respect of the monitoring, control and surveillance of fishing activities with the lack of capacities and infrastructure.
Pristojni organi držav članic ob upoštevanju člena 18(1)(g) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu zavrnejo uvoz ribiških proizvodov v Unijo, ne da bi jim bilo treba zahtevati kakršne koli dodatne dokaze ali pošiljati prošnjo za pomoč državi zastave, ko ugotovijo, da so potrdilo o ulovu potrdili organi države zastave, ki je opredeljena kot nesodelujoča država v skladu s členom 31 navedene uredbe.
In this respect it is noted that the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines authorities have not invoked any argument on development constraints and argued that its administration has a good overall efficiency level.
Navesti bi bilo treba, da opredelitev Saint Vincenta in Grenadin kot države, ki jo Komisija obravnava kot nesodelujočo državo, ne izključuje poznejših ukrepov, ki jih Komisija ali Svet sprejme za pripravo seznama nesodelujočih držav.
In view of recitals 41, 42 and 43 of the Decision of 12 December 2014 and the developments after 12 December 2014, the Commission takes the view, pursuant to Article 31(7) of the IUU Regulation, that the overall performance of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines with respect to fisheries are not impaired by its level of development.
POSTOPEK ODBORA
CONCLUSION ON THE IDENTIFICATION AS A NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRY
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za ribištvo in ribogojstvo –
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines' failure to discharge its duties under international law as flag, port, coastal or market State and to take action to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing, that country should be identified, in accordance with Article 31 of the IUU Regulation, as a non-cooperating third country in fighting against IUU fishing.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Having regard to Article 18(1)(g) of the IUU Regulation, the competent authorities of the Member States are bound to refuse the importation into the Union of fishery products without having to request any additional evidence or send a request for assistance to the flag State where they become aware that the catch certificate has been validated by the authorities of a flag State identified as a non-cooperating State in accordance with Article 31 of that Regulation.
Člen 1
It should be stated that the identification of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as a country the Commission considers to be non-cooperating does not preclude any subsequent step taken by the Commission or the Council for the purpose of establishing a list of non-cooperating countries.
Saint Vincent in Grenadine se opredelijo kot tretja država, ki jo Komisija obravnava kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu.
COMMITTEE PROCEDURE
Člen 2
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
V Bruslju, 23. maja 2017
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is identified as a third country that the Commission considers as a non-cooperating third country in fighting illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.
Predsednik
Article 2
UL L 286, 29.10.2008, str. 1.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Sklep Komisije z dne 12. decembra 2014 o obvestilu tretji državi, za katero po mnenju Komisije obstaja možnost, da bo opredeljena kot nesodelujoča tretja država v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1005/2008 o vzpostavitvi sistema Skupnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje (UL C 453, 17.12.2014, str. 5).
Done at Brussels, 23 May 2017.
Glej vijolično obvestilo Interpola št. 248 z dne 13. januarja 2015, https://www.ccamlr.org/en/compliance/non-contracting-party-iuu-vessel-list in opombo 13.
The President
Zakon št. 2015-18 z dne 13. julija 2015
OJ L 286, 29.10.2008, p.
Informacije so pridobljene s spletne strani: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics.
1.
Uredba (ES) št. 1905/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja (UL L 378, 27.12.2006, str.
Commission Decision of 12 December 2014 notifying a third country that the Commission considers as possible of being identified as non-cooperating third countries pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (OJ C 453, 17.12.2014, p.
41).
5).
Saint Vincentu in Grenadinam je bila dana možnost, da se odzovejo na Sklep z dne 12. decembra 2014 in na druge pomembne informacije, ki jih je sporočila Komisija, ter možnost, da predložijo dokaze, ki izpodbijajo ali dopolnjujejo dejstva, navedena v Sklepu z dne 12. decembra 2014.
See Interpol Purple Notice No 248 of 13 January 2015, https://www.ccamlr.org/en/compliance/non-contracting-party-iuu-vessel-list and footnote 13.
Saint Vincentu in Grenadinam je bila zagotovljena pravica, da zahtevajo ali predložijo dodatne informacije.
See footnote 3.
Obravnavane in upoštevane so bile ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih po datumu Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014 predložili Saint Vincent in Grenadine.
Act No 2015-18 of 13 July 2015.
Saint Vincent in Grenadine so bili o ugotovitvah Komisije obveščeni pisno ali ustno.
Information retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics
Komisija je februarja 2016 opravila obisk za dialog s ciljem, da bi se pogovorila o napredku, doseženem od datuma Sklepa z dne 12. decembra 2014.
Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation (OJ L 378, 27.12.2006, p.
Obisk je potrdil, da napake pri obravnavi pomanjkljivosti, opredeljenih v Sklepu, ostajajo.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/919
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/919
amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1942 on the specifications of the European Investment Project Portal
o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2016/1942 o specifikacijah Evropskega portala naložbenih projektov
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2015 on the European Fund for Strategic Investments, the European Investment Advisory Hub and the European Investment Project Portal and amending Regulations (EU) No 1291/2013 and (EU) No 1316/2013 — the European Fund for Strategic Investments [1], and in particular Article 15(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2015/1017 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. junija 2015 o Evropskem skladu za strateške naložbe, Evropskem svetovalnem vozlišču za naložbe in Evropskem portalu naložbenih projektov ter o spremembi uredb (EU) št. 1291/2013 in (EU) št. 1316/2013 – Evropski sklad za strateške naložbe [1] ter zlasti člena 15(1) Uredbe,
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 entrusts the Commission with the responsibility to create, with the support of the European Investment Bank (EIB), a European Investment Project Portal (EIPP).
Uredba (EU) 2015/1017 Komisiji nalaga odgovornost za vzpostavitev Evropskega portala naložbenih projektov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EIPP) ob podpori Evropske investicijske banke (EIB).
The EIPP is a publicly available web portal of investment projects which acts as a platform to promote projects to potential investors worldwide.
EIPP je javno dostopen spletni portal naložbenih projektov, ki deluje kot platforma za promocijo projektov potencialnim vlagateljem po svetu.
The specifications of the EIPP have been set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1942 [2].
Specifikacije EIPP so bile določene v Izvedbenem sklepu Komisije (EU) 2016/1942 [2].
Experience gained in managing the EIPP indicates that certain provisions should be amended, especially to attract more projects from smaller project promoters, SMEs and mid-caps, in line with the objective of the European Union to support the SMEs and entrepreneurship.
Glede na izkušnje, pridobljene pri upravljanju EIPP, bi bilo treba nekatere določbe spremeniti, zlasti da se privabi več projektov manjših nosilcev projektov, malih in srednjih podjetij ter podjetij s srednje veliko tržno kapitalizacijo v skladu s ciljem Evropske unije, da se podprejo mala in srednja podjetja in podjetništvo.
Therefore the minimum project cost should be lowered from EUR 5 million to EUR 1 million.
Zato bi bilo treba znižati najmanjše stroške projekta s 5 milijonov EUR na 1 milijon EUR.
To increase the attractiveness of the EIPP and to alleviate the charge supported by project promoters in a non-discriminatory manner and thus to give the EIPP an impetus for a higher number of published projects, the application processing fee should not be charged to any project promoters.
Da bi se povečala privlačnost EIPP in na nediskriminatoren način zmanjšale pristojbine nosilcev projektov ter s tem spodbudilo večje število objavljenih projektov na EIPP, se nobenemu nosilcu projekta ne bi smela zaračunati pristojbina za obravnavo vlog.
The project screening set out in Section 3 of the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1942 should remain in place to ensure the publication of quality projects on the EIPP,
Pregled projektov iz oddelka 3 Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu (EU) 2016/1942 bi bilo treba ohraniti, da se zagotovi objava kakovostnih projektov na EIPP –
Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1942 is amended as follows:
Izvedbeni sklep (EU) 2016/1942 se spremeni:
In Article 2, point (a) is replaced by the following:
v členu 2 se točka (a) nadomesti z naslednjim:
the project (or the programme consisting of smaller projects) shall have a minimum total project cost of EUR 1000000;’;
skupni stroški projekta (ali programa, ki ga sestavljajo manjši projekti) znašajo vsaj 1000000 EUR;“;
Article 3 is replaced by the following:
člen 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
No application processing fee shall be charged.’;
Pristojbina za obravnavo vlog se ne zaračunava.“;
Section 4 of the Annex is deleted.
oddelek 4 Priloge se črta.
OJ L 169, 1.7.2015, p.
UL L 169, 1.7.2015, str.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/925
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/925
temporarily authorising certain Member States to certify pre-basic material of certain species of fruit plants, produced in the field under non-insect proof conditions, and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/167
o začasnem dovoljenju nekaterim državam članicam za certificiranje predbaznega materiala nekaterih vrst sadnih rastlin, pridelanih na polju v pogojih, ki ne zagotavljajo zaščite pred žuželkami, in razveljavitvi Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2017/167
(notified under document C(2017) 2800)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2017) 2800)
Having regard to Council Directive 2008/90/EC of 29 September 2008 on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production [1], and in particular Article 4 and Articles 6(4), 9(1) and 13(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2008/90/ES z dne 29. septembra 2008 o trženju razmnoževalnega materiala sadnih rastlin in sadnih rastlin, namenjenih za pridelavo sadja [1], ter zlasti člena 4, člena 6(4), člena 9(1) in člena 13(3) Direktive,
Having regard to Commission Implementing Directive 2014/98/EU of 15 October 2014 implementing Council Directive 2008/90/EC as regards specific requirements for the genus and species of fruit plants referred to in Annex I thereto, specific requirements to be met by suppliers and detailed rules concerning official inspections [2], and in particular Article 8(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Izvedbene direktive Komisije 2014/98/EU z dne 15. oktobra 2014 o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 2008/90/ES v zvezi s posebnimi zahtevami za rodove in vrste sadnih rastlin iz Priloge I k Direktivi, posebnimi zahtevami, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati dobavitelji, in podrobnimi predpisi za uradne preglede [2] ter zlasti člena 8(4) Direktive,
Implementing Directive 2014/98/EU lays down rules for the production, certification, and marketing of pre-basic material, basic material, certified material and fruit plants.
Izvedbena direktiva 2014/98/EU določa pravila za pridelavo, certificiranje in trženje predbaznega materiala, baznega materiala, certificiranega materiala in sadnih rastlin.
Article 8(1) of Implementing Directive 2014/98/EU requires that pre-basic mother plants and pre-basic material are produced under insect proof conditions.
V skladu s členom 8(1) Izvedbene direktive 2014/98/EU se zahteva pridelava predbaznih matičnih rastlin in predbaznega materiala v pogojih, ki zagotavljajo zaščito pred žuželkami.