natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In fact, one Union producer currently sells LWTP weighing 42 g/m2.
Pravzaprav eden izmed proizvajalcev Unije trenutno prodaja lahek termoreaktivni papir s težo 42 g/m2.
Third, there is no clear dividing line when it comes to grammage.
Tretjič, ni jasne ločnice v zvezi z gramaturo.
Thermal paper producers work with a tolerance in terms of weight.
Proizvajalci termoreaktivnega papirja pri delu uporabljajo toleranco v smislu teže.
It is for instance possible that a paper marketed as 45 g/m2 weighs actually a bit less or that a paper marketed as 44 g/m2 weighs indeed more than announced.
Možno je na primer, da papir, ki se trži z gramaturo 45 g/m2, dejansko tehta nekoliko manj oziroma da papir, ki se trži z gramaturo 44 g/m2, dejansko tehta več, kot je navedeno.
Thus, the claim was dismissed.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Accordingly, the conclusions regarding the product concerned and the like product reached in recitals (16) to (24) of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Glede na navedeno so bili sklepi v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom iz uvodnih izjav od 16 do 24 začasne uredbe potrjeni.
As explained in recital (12) of the provisional Regulation, the Hansol Group comprises of the Korean exporting producers Hansol Paper and Artone.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 12 začasne uredbe, skupino Hansol sestavljata korejska proizvajalca izvoznika Hansol Paper in Artone.
In the case of Artone, there were two product types with no or unrepresentative domestic sales.
V primeru družbe Artone se dve vrsti izdelka nista prodajali na domačem trgu oziroma je bila domača prodaja nereprezentativna.
For these two product types, the normal value was, pursuant to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, calculated on the basis of Artone's cost of production (see recitals (34) to (36) of the provisional Regulation).
Normalna vrednost teh dveh vrst izdelka se je v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe izračunala na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje družbe Artone (glej uvodne izjave od 34 do 36 začasne uredbe).
Following provisional disclosure, the Hansol Group claimed that, in the determination of the normal value for these two product types, the Commission should have used the prices of the other producer, Hansol Paper, instead of constructing the normal value on the basis of Artone's cost of production.
Skupina Hansol je po začasnem razkritju trdila, da bi morala Komisija pri določitvi normalne vrednosti za ti dve vrsti izdelka uporabiti cene drugega proizvajalca, in sicer družbe Hansol Paper, namesto da je normalno vrednost konstruirala na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje družbe Artone.
The claim was rejected, since the Commission established that the cost structure and sales prices of Artone were significantly different from that of Hansol Paper.
Trditev je bila zavrnjena, saj je Komisija ugotovila, da so se struktura stroškov in prodajne cene družbe Artone precej razlikovale od strukture stroškov in prodajnih cen družbe Hansol Paper.
In addition, for one of these two product types sold by Hansol Paper, the domestic sales quantities were found to be unrepresentative.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile količine domače prodaje ene od teh dveh vrst izdelka, ki ga prodaja družba Hansol Paper, nereprezentativne.
Therefore, the Commission confirmed that under these circumstances it was more appropriate that the normal value for these product types be calculated on the basis of Artone's cost of production plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs (‘SGA’) and profit, in accordance with the first option under Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je Komisija potrdila, da je bilo v teh razmerah normalno vrednost teh vrst izdelka v skladu s prvo možnostjo iz člena 2(3) osnovne Uredbe primerneje izračunati na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje družbe Artone, ki so se jim prišteli razumni zneski za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške ter dobiček.
In its comments on the provisional disclosure, the Hansol Group contested the inclusion of small rolls in the dumping calculations for two reasons.
Skupina Hansol je v svojih pripombah na začasno razkritje iz dveh razlogov izpodbijala vključitev majhnih zavitkov v izračune dampinga.
First, the volume of jumbo rolls sales to unrelated parties would be significant and therefore a calculation on the basis of those sales would be representative.
Prvič, obseg prodaje velikih zvitkov nepovezanim stranem bi bil precejšen, zato bi bil izračun na podlagi te prodaje reprezentativen.
Second, small rolls are not the product concerned.
Drugič, majhni zvitki niso zadevni izdelek.
As explained in recitals (25) and (37) of the provisional Regulation, the vast majority (between 75 % and 85 %) of the Union sales by Hansol Paper and Artone were sales to related parties destined for conversion into small rolls.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 25 in 37 začasne uredbe, je velika večina (75–85 %) prodaje družb Hansol Paper in Artone v Uniji obsegala prodajo povezanim stranem, namenjeno predelavi v majhne zvitke.
In view of the significant quantity of the jumbo rolls that were converted into small rolls and only then resold to unrelated customers, the Commission maintained that these small rolls could not be ignored in the calculations.
Glede na precejšnjo količino velikih zvitkov, ki so bili predelani v majhne zvitke in šele nato prodani naprej nepovezanim strankam, je Komisija menila, da je treba te majhne zvitke upoštevati v izračunih.
It was thus appropriate that for the sales of jumbo rolls to related parties for conversion into small rolls, the export price be established on the basis of the price at which the imported and converted product was first resold to independent customers in the Union, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo ustrezno, da je bila za prodajo velikih zvitkov povezanim stranem za predelavo v majhne zvitke izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi in predelani izdelek prvič prodan naprej neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
Following definitive disclosure, the Hansol Group repeated its objection to the inclusion of small rolls in the dumping calculation.
Skupina Hansol je po dokončnem razkritju ponovila svoje nasprotovanje vključitvi majhnih zavitkov v izračun dampinga.
However, no new elements were brought forward.
Vendar pa niso bili predstavljeni nobeni novi argumenti.
Furthermore, the Hansol Group criticised the fact that, as concerns sales through related parties, the dumping margin was based on data from one related converter and not on data from all four related converters.
Skupina Hansol je kritizirala tudi dejstvo, da je, kar zadeva prodajo prek povezanih strani, stopnja dampinga temeljila na podatkih enega povezanega predelovalca, in ne na podatkih vseh štirih povezanih predelovalcev.
In this respect, the following is to be noted.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti na naslednje.
On 19 February 2016, the Hansol Group requested the Commission to fully exempt three of the four related converters from replying to the questionnaire.
Skupina Hansol je 19. februarja 2016 od Komisije zahtevala, naj tri od štirih povezanih predelovalcev v celoti izvzame iz izpolnjevanja vprašalnika.
On 23 February 2016, the Commission accepted that request while specifically reserving the right to make further enquiries/requests for information as and when necessary in respect of these other three related converters.
Komisija je 23. februarja 2016 sprejela to zahtevo, obenem pa si je izrecno pridržala pravico, da po potrebi opravi dodatne poizvedbe oziroma poda zahtevke za informacije v zvezi s temi tremi ostalimi povezanimi predelovalci.
On 7 March 2016, after having further analysed the information submitted by the Hansol Group during a meeting on 22 February 2016, the Commission requested these three related converters to reply to an adapted version of the questionnaire which, inter alia, included the request for data regarding conversion costs and small rolls resales.
Komisija je 7. marca 2016 po dodatni analizi informacij, ki jih je skupina Hansol predložila na sestanku 22. februarja 2016, zahtevala, da zadevni trije povezani predelovalci izpolnijo prilagojeno različico vprašalnika, ki je med drugim vključeval zahtevo po podatkih glede stroškov predelave in nadaljnje prodaje majhnih zvitkov.
It motivated its request for the hearing by repeating its request to exempt the three related converters from replying to the questionnaire and as it could not understand ‘why the Commission (would request) cost and sales data for the product not concerned and how these data could be used in any meaningful way in the present investigation’.
Na podlagi teh predlogov je Komisija proučila, kako bi bilo mogoče zmanjšati obremenitev za povezana predelovalna podjetja in zagotoviti sledljivost med prodajo majhnih zvitkov in uvozom velikih zvitkov.
This position was reiterated during the hearing.
Komisija je po tem prvem zaslišanju marca 2016 in obisku na kraju samem ugotovila naslednje.
The Hearing Officer suggested finding a compromise between the Commission services and the interested party on the question of how to verify if the volume of data, traceability and construction of the export price based on sales of small rolls was relevant to the investigation and he suggested a pre-verification visit to the fourth related importer, for which no exemption had been requested, to verify the correctness of the party's explanations above and, based on the positive results, a limitation of the investigation to that party as concerns the construction of the export price with regard to Hansol Group's sales of small rolls.
Prvič, eden od štirih povezanih predelovalcev je kupil daleč najmanjši delež velikih zvitkov za predelavo od drugih nepovezanih nekorejskih proizvajalcev velikih zvitkov (tj. manj kot 25 % svojih nakupov velikih zvitkov).
Further to these suggestions, the Commission considered how it could be possible to reduce the burden for the related converter companies and how to establish traceability between the sales of small rolls and imports of jumbo rolls.
Drugič, isti povezani predelovalec je od skupine Hansol kupil daleč največjo količino velikih zvitkov za predelavo v majhne zvitke.
After that first hearing in March 2016 and the subsequent on-site visit, the Commission established the following.
Tretjič, isti povezani predelovalec je ustvaril večino prodaje velikih zvitkov skupine Hansol povezanim predelovalcem v Uniji ter največji obseg nadaljnje prodaje velikih zvitkov neodvisnim strankam.
First, among the four related converters, one related converter purchased, by far, the lowest share of jumbo rolls for conversion from other unrelated non-Korean jumbo rolls producers (i.e. less than 25 % of its jumbo roll purchases).
Nazadnje, tudi njegov obseg prodaje majhnih zvitkov nepovezanim strankam je bil precej večji kot takšni obsegi vseh štirih povezanih predelovalcev, razen enega.
Second, that same related converter purchased the largest volumes of jumbo rolls for conversion into small rolls from Hansol Group.
Vendar je bil slednji pridobljen šele v drugi polovici obdobja preiskave in je bil torej manj reprezentativen.
Third, the same related converter accounted for most of the Hansol Group's sales of jumbo rolls to related converters in the Union and it also accounted for the largest volume of jumbo rolls re-sales to independent customers.
Glede na navedeno se je Komisija odločila, da bodo njene ugotovitve glede prodaje skupine Hansol prek povezanih predelovalcev temeljile na podatkih povezanega predelovalca, ki se bo štel za najbolj reprezentativnega.
Finally, its volume of sales to unrelated customers of small rolls was also significantly higher than such volumes by all four related converters, except for one.
Te ugotovitve so se štele za reprezentativne za prodajo tega podjetja prek povezanih predelovalcev glede na majhen obseg nakupov velikih zvitkov za predelavo nekorejskega porekla s strani tega povezanega predelovalca in glede na velik obseg prodaje skupine Hansol nepovezanim strankam, pri katerem je sodeloval.
However, the latter was only acquired during the second half of the investigation period and was thus less representative.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 25 začasne uredbe, se je obema prodajnima kanaloma (tj. prodaji velikih zvitkov nepovezanim stranem in prodaji velikih zvitkov povezanim stranem za predelavo v majhne zvitke) pripisal primeren pomen.
Against this backdrop, the Commission decided to base its findings with regard to Hansol Group's sales through related converters on the data from that related converter which was considered the most representative.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 45 začasne uredbe, je bila torej ugotovitev glede prodaje velikih zvitkov povezanim stranem za predelavo v majhne zvitke in njihovo naknadno nadaljnjo prodajo nepovezanim stranem ekstrapolirana, da je izražala dejanske prodajne tokove skupine Hansol v obdobju preiskave.
These findings were considered as representative in respect of the company's sales through related converters in view of this related convertor's low volumes of jumbo roll purchases for conversion with a non-Korean origin as well as the high volumes of Hansol Group sales to unrelated parties it had been involved in.
Komisija je potrdila, da je bil ta pristop primeren iz naslednjih razlogov.
Furthermore, as indicated in recital (25) of the provisional Regulation, both sales channels (i.e. sales of jumbo rolls to unrelated parties and sales of jumbo rolls to related parties destined for conversion into small rolls) were given the appropriate weight.
Poudarjeno je bilo, da je v obdobju preiskave 75–85 % prodaje skupine Hansol v Uniji potekalo prek povezanih predelovalcev za predelavo v majhne zvitke.
Thus, as explained in recital (45) of the provisional Regulation, the finding with regard to the sales of jumbo rolls to related parties for conversion into and subsequent resale as small rolls to unrelated parties was extrapolated to reflect the actual sales flows of the Hansol Group during the investigation period.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da je takšna prodaja, izračunana nazaj na raven velikih zvitkov, potekala po drugačnih cenah kot prodaja velikih zvitkov nepovezanim strankam.
The Commission confirmed that this approach was appropriate for the following reasons.
Da bi bil morebitni dejanski damping ustrezno izražen, se je torej obema prodajnima kanaloma pripisal primeren pomen, pri čemer sta se ustrezno upoštevala obseg in vrednost prodaje posameznega prodajnega kanala.
It was recalled that, during the investigation period, 75 % - 85 % of Hansol Group's sales to the Union were made through related converters for conversion into small rolls.
Skupina Hansol je po dokončnem razkritju trdila tudi, da je Komisija dejansko vzorčila zadevnega povezanega predelovalca.
The investigation established that such sales, calculated back to the level of the jumbo roll, were made at different prices as compared to the sales of jumbo rolls to unrelated customers.
Trdila je, da bi Komisija kršila člen 17 osnovne uredbe, če skupine Hansol med preiskavo in zlasti pred začasnim razkritjem ne bi obvestila, da bo ugotovitev glede prodaje velikih zvitkov povezanim stranem za predelavo in nadaljnjo prodajo v obliki majhnih zvitkov ekstrapolirana za prikaz dejanskih prodajnih tokov skupine Hansol.
Therefore, in order to properly reflect the dumping practised, if any, both sales channels had been attributed the appropriate weight, taking duly into account the sales volumes and values of each sales channel.
Ta trditev je bila ponovljena po dodatnem dokončnem razkritju.
After definitive disclosure, the Hansol Group further claimed that the Commission had actually sampled the related converter.
Skupina Hansol je navedla tudi, da je bila odločitev Komisije o ekstrapolaciji ugotovitev v zvezi s povezanim predelovalcem brez pravne podlage.
It alleged that by not having informed the Hansol Group during the investigation and notably prior to the provisional disclosure that the finding with regard to the sales of jumbo rolls to related parties for conversion into and subsequent resale as small rolls to unrelated parties would be extrapolated to reflect the actual sales flows of the Hansol Group, the Commission would have violated Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je že na samem začetku poudarila, da ni uporabila člena 17 osnovne uredbe.
This claim was repeated after the additional final disclosure.
Glede na to, da je skupina Hansol ugovarjala izpolnjevanju vprašalnika za vse štiri povezane predelovalce, in da bi se upoštevalo predlog pooblaščenca za zaslišanje, naj se omeji breme za zadevno stran in vendar doseže zanesljive ugotovitve v zvezi s prodajo majhnih zvitkov in nadaljnjo prodajo velikih zvitkov, se je Komisija osredotočila na zadevnega povezanega predelovalca, ker je bil na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila skupina Hansol, in so bile nato preverjene med obiskom na kraju samem, najustreznejši za zagotovitev najnatančnejših številčnih podatkov v zvezi z večino prodaje skupine Hansol v Uniji (tj. njene prodaje povezanim predelovalcem za nadaljnjo prodajo nepovezanim strankam v obliki majhnih zvitkov).
The Hansol Group also submitted that the Commission's decision to extrapolate the related converter's findings had no legal basis.
Kar zadeva ostale tri povezane predelovalce je Komisija ugotovila, da je njihova prodaja v Uniji precej manj točna in reprezentativna zaradi številnih dejavnikov, opisanih v uvodni izjavi 28 zgoraj.
The Commission pointed out from the outset that it did not make use of Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Dejansko bi njihova vključitev v analizo zaradi veliko višje ravni velikih zvitkov nekorejskega porekla in dejstva, da je bil eden izmed treh ostalih povezanih predelovalcev pridobljen šele sredi obdobja preiskave, povzročila manj zanesljivo ugotovitev v zvezi s korejsko prodajo.
Given that the Hansol Group had objected to replying to a questionnaire for all four related converters and in order to accommodate the suggestion of the Hearing Officer to limit the burden to the party concerned and yet arrive at reliable findings with regard to the sales of small rolls and resales of jumbo rolls, the Commission focused on the related converter in question because it was, on the basis of the information provided by the Hansol Group and verified during the subsequent on spot visit, the best placed to provide the most accurate figures with regard to the majority of Hansol Group's Union sales (i.e. its sales to related converters for subsequent resale as small roll to unrelated customers).
Komisija zato ni uporabila člena 17 osnovne uredbe in trditev skupine Hansol, da je Komisija uporabila vzorčenje v zvezi s povezanimi predelovalci, ni pravilna.
With regard to the other three related converters, the Commission found that their Union sales were much less accurate and representative due to a number of factors described in recital (28) above.
Nasprotno, Komisija si je v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe v posebnih okoliščinah te zadeve, kot so opisane v uvodnih izjavah 28 in 29 zgoraj, prizadevala ugotoviti najbolj zanesljivo izvozno ceno v primeru prodaje velikih zvitkov, namenjenih predelavi v majhne zvitke, povezanim stranem.
Indeed, the much higher levels of non-Korean sourced jumbo rolls and the fact that one of the three other related converters was only acquired in the middle of the investigation period would have resulted in a less reliable finding with regard to these Korean sales if they would have been included in the analysis.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 6(8) osnovne uredbe preverila točnost informacij, ki jih je predložila zainteresirana stran, kolikor je bilo mogoče.
Therefore, the Commission did not make use of Article 17 of the basic Regulation and Hansol Group's claim that the Commission had applied sampling with regard to the related converters is not correct.
Poleg tega bi se morala skupina Hansol že od zgodnje faze preiskave dalje zavedati pomena prodaje prek povezanih predelovalcev.
Rather, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, the Commission sought to establish, in the specific circumstance of the case at hand, described in recitals (28) and (29) above, the most reliable export price in case of sales of jumbo rolls to related parties destined for conversion into small rolls.
Prvič, pritožnik je že v pritožbi, ob predložitvi stopnje dampinga, opozoril na dejstvo, da je večina prodaje skupine Hansol v Uniji potekala prek povezanih predelovalcev in da je bil damping v zvezi s to prodajo znatno višji od dampinga v zvezi z njeno neposredno prodajo.
Pursuant to Article 6(8) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined the information supplied by the interested party for accuracy as far as possible.
Pritožnik je izračunal dve stopnji (eno za neposredno prodajo in eno za prodajo prek povezanih družb), za kar je določil tudi kot enostavno povprečje, ker ni mogel natančno vedeti, kako pomembna je bila neposredna prodaja skupine Hansol nepovezanim stranem (vendar je bil v pritožbi navedeni odstotek deleža te prodaje v skupni prodaji skupine Hansol v Uniji zelo blizu dejanskemu).
In addition, from the early stages of the investigation, the Hansol Group should have been aware of the relevance of sales made through related converters.
Drugič, Komisija je skupini Hansol že na prvem zaslišanju pojasnila, da ne more zanemariti večine prodaje skupine Hansol, ki poteka prek povezanih predelovalcev, in da bi jo bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati v izračunu dampinga.
First, in the complaint, when submitting a dumping margin, the complainant already drew the attention to the fact that the bulk of the Hansol Group's Union sales was made through related converters and that the dumping in respect of these sales was considerably higher than the dumping regarding its direct sales.
Komisija je zato v vprašalnik za povezane predelovalce vključila zahtevo po celovitih informacijah o nadaljnji prodaji majhnih zvitkov in o stroških predelave velikega zvitka v majhnega.
The complainant calculated two margins (one for direct sales and one for sales through related companies) for which it determined also a simple average as it could not know exactly how significant the Hansol Group's direct sales to unrelated parties were (the percentage mentioned in the complaint for the share of these sales in Hansol Group's total Union sales was however very close to reality).
Tretjič, zaradi nadaljnjih razprav in ker je Komisija sprejela zahtevo skupine Hansol, prejeto 21. marca 2016 prek elektronske pošte, naj se opusti zahteva, da vprašalnik izpolnijo ostali trije povezani predelovalci, je morala Komisija svojo analizo te prodaje omejiti na zadevnega povezanega predelovalca.
Second, already during the first hearing, the Commission made it clear to the Hansol Group that it could not ignore the majority of Hansol Group's sales which were made through related converters and that they should properly be accounted for in the calculation of dumping.
Nazadnje, Komisija je razkrila vse razloge in številčne podatke, ki so bili osnova za ekstrapolacijo v zvezi s to prodajo, in sicer tako v fazi uvedbe začasnih ukrepov kot tudi v fazi končnega razkritja.
For that reason, the Commission had included in the questionnaires for related converters a request for full details on the resales of small rolls and on the costs for converting a jumbo roll into a small roll.
Pravice zadevne zainteresirane strani so bile torej v celoti upoštevane.
Third, the subsequent discussions and acceptance by the Commission, by email of 21 March 2016, of the Hansol Group's request to drop the requirement for the other three related converters to reply to the questionnaire had the consequence that the Commission had to limit its analysis in respect of those sales to the related converter in question.
Trditve skupine Hansol se zato zavrnejo.
Finally, the Commission disclosed all the reasons and figures behind the extrapolation done with regard to these sales at the stage of the imposition of provisional measures as well as at the stage of definitive disclosure.
Skupina Hansol je trdila še, da so bile cene, zaračunane njenim povezanim predelovalcem, primerljive tržne cene.