natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, Annex V to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should be amended accordingly.
Zato bi bilo treba Prilogo V k Uredbi (EU) 2016/44 ustrezno spremeniti.
In order to implement this delisting, this Regulation should enter into force immediately,
Za uveljavitev tega črtanja s seznama bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati takoj –
Annex V to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga V k Uredbi (EU) 2016/44 se nadomesti s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
34.
UL L 12, 19.1.2016, str. 1.
OJ L 12 19.1.2016, p.
PRILOGA
1.
Priloga V k Uredbi (EU) 2016/44 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
ANNEX
„PRILOGA V“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/820
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/820
amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 153/2013 as regards the time horizons for the liquidation period to be considered for the different classes of financial instruments
o spremembi Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 153/2013 glede časovnih obdobij za unovčenje, ki jih je treba upoštevati za različne razrede finančnih instrumentov
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories [1], and in particular Article 41(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. julija 2012 o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, centralnih nasprotnih strankah in repozitorijih sklenjenih poslov [1] ter zlasti člena 41(5) Uredbe,
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 153/2013 [2] lays down regulatory technical standards on requirements for central counterparties (CCPs) regarding the time horizons for the liquidation period to be considered for the different classes of financial instruments.
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 153/2013 [2] določa regulativne tehnične standarde o zahtevah za centralne nasprotne stranke (CNS) glede časovnih obdobij za unovčenje, ki jih je treba upoštevati za različne razrede finančnih instrumentov.
It is necessary to keep those regulatory technical standards up to date with relevant regulatory developments.
Navedene regulativne tehnične standarde je treba posodabljati v skladu z zadevnimi regulativnimi spremembami.
For the purposes of calculating margin requirements necessary to cover a CCP's exposure to market risk, certain account structures based on a minimum of a one-day liquidation period calculated on a gross basis provide a sufficient level of coverage to the CCPs and better protect clients and mitigate systemic risks.
Za namene izračuna zahtev po kritju, potrebnem za kritje izpostavljenosti CNS tržnemu tveganju, nekatere strukture računa, ki temeljijo na minimalno enodnevnem obdobju unovčenja na bruto osnovi, zagotavljajo zadostno raven kritja CNS, bolje ščitijo stranke in zmanjšujejo sistemska tveganja.
That minimum liquidation period should therefore be permitted for the clearing of clients' positions on financial instruments other than over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives where certain conditions are met.
Navedeno minimalno obdobje unovčenja bi moralo biti zato dovoljeno za kliring pozicij strank, opravljen na finančnih instrumentih, ki niso izvedeni finančni instrumenti, s katerimi se trguje na prostem trgu (OTC), če so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji.
Considering that individual segregated accounts ensure an even greater level of protection to clients than gross omnibus accounts, individual segregated accounts should benefit from a minimum liquidation period for calculating margins of the same length as gross omnibus accounts.
Glede na to, da posamezni ločeni računi strankam zagotavljajo še večjo stopnjo zaščite kot zbirni računi na bruto osnovi, bi moralo za posamezne ločene račune veljati minimalno obdobje unovčenja za izračun kritij, ki je enako dolgo kot za zbirne račune na bruto osnovi.
For CCPs that during the day do not allocate the trades to each client, the reduction of the minimum liquidation period from two days to one day might imply that for new trades cleared during the day and not allocated to individual clients the CCP is margining them on a one-day net basis.
Za CNS, ki tekom dneva poslov ne dodelijo vsaki stranki, lahko skrajšanje minimalnega obdobja unovčenja z dveh na en dan pomeni, da za nove posle, za katere je kliring opravljen tekom dneva in niso dodeljeni posameznim strankam, CNS terja kritje na enodnevni neto osnovi.
This may expose the CCP to significant losses in case of intraday price movements that do not trigger the call of intraday margins.
To lahko izpostavi CNS znatnim izgubam, če cenovna gibanja znotraj dne ne sprožijo terjanja kritij znotraj dne.
Therefore, a specific threshold needs to be set to ensure that CCPs call intraday margins and remain sufficiently protected notwithstanding the reduction of the liquidation period.
Zato je treba določiti poseben prag za zagotovitev, da CNS terjajo kritja znotraj dne in ostanejo dovolj zaščitene, ne glede na skrajšanje obdobja unovčenja.
Delegated Regulation (EU) No 153/2013 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Delegirano uredbo (EU) št. 153/2013 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
This Regulation is based on draft regulatory technical standards submitted by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to the Commission following consultation of the European Banking Authority and the European System of Central Banks.
Ta uredba temelji na osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, ki jih je Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge (ESMA) po posvetovanju z Evropskim bančnim organom in Evropskim sistemom centralnih bank predložil Komisiji.
In accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], ESMA has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010,
V skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] je ESMA o osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, opravila javna posvetovanja, analizirala morebitne s tem povezane stroške in koristi ter zahtevala mnenje interesne skupine za vrednostne papirje in trge, ustanovljene v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010 –
Article 26 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 153/2013 is amended as follows:
Člen 26 Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 153/2013 se spremeni:
paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:
odstavka 1 in 2 se nadomestita z naslednjim:
For the purposes of Article 41 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, a CCP shall determine the appropriate time horizons for the liquidation period taking into account the characteristics of the financial instrument cleared, of the type of account in which the financial instrument is held, of the market where the financial instrument is traded, and the following minimum time horizons for the liquidation period:
Za namene člena 41 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 CNS določi ustrezna časovna obdobja za unovčenje, pri čemer upošteva značilnosti finančnega instrumenta, za katerega se opravlja kliring, vrsto računa, na katerem se hrani finančni instrument, trg, na katerem se z njim trguje, in naslednja minimalna časovna obdobja za unovčenje:
two business days for financial instruments other than OTC derivatives held in accounts not meeting the conditions laid down in point (c);
dva delovna dneva za finančne instrumente, ki niso izvedeni finančni instrumenti OTC, na računih, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev, določenih v točki (c);
one business day for financial instruments other than OTC derivatives held in omnibus client accounts or in individual client accounts provided that the following conditions are met:
en delovni dan za finančne instrumente, ki niso izvedeni finančni instrumenti OTC, na zbirnih računih strank ali posameznih računih strank, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
the CCP keeps separate records of the positions of each client at least at the end of each day, calculates the margins in respect of each client, and collects the sum of the margin requirements applicable to each client on a gross basis;
CNS vodi ločene evidence pozicij posameznih strank vsaj ob koncu vsakega dne, izračuna kritja za vsako stranko in pobere vsoto zahtev po kritju za vsako stranko na bruto osnovi;
the identity of all the clients is known to the CCP;
CNS pozna identiteto vseh strank;
the positions held in the account are not proprietary positions of undertakings of the same group as the clearing member;
pozicije na računu niso lastne pozicije podjetij iste skupine kot klirinški član;
the CCP measures the exposures and calculates for each account initial and variation margin requirements on a near to real-time basis and at least every one hour during the day using updated positions and prices;
CNS meri izpostavljenosti in za vsak račun izračuna zahteve po začetnem in gibljivem kritju v čim bolj realnem času in najmanj vsako uro tekom dneva, tako da uporabi posodobljene pozicije in cene;
where the CCP does not allocate new trades to each client during the day, the CCP collects the margins within one hour where the margin requirements calculated in accordance with point (iv) are higher than 110 % of the updated available collateral in accordance with Chapter X, unless the amount of the intraday margins to be paid to the CCP is not material on the basis of predefined amount defined by the CCP and agreed by the competent authority, and to the extent that trades previously allocated to clients are margined separately from trades that are not allocated during the day.
kadar CNS vsaki stranki tekom dneva ne dodeljuje novih poslov, CNS pobira kritja v eni uri, če so zahteve po kritju, izračunane v skladu s točko (iv), višje od 110 % posodobljenega razpoložljivega zavarovanja s premoženjem v skladu s poglavjem X, razen če znesek kritij znotraj dne, ki se plača CNS, ni bistven na podlagi zneska, ki ga vnaprej določi CNS in s katerim se strinja pristojni organ, in če se za posle, ki so bili prej dodeljeni strankam, terjajo kritja ločeno od poslov, ki niso dodeljeni tekom dneva.
In all cases, for determining the appropriate time horizons for the liquidation period, the CCP shall evaluate and sum at least the following:
CNS pri določanju ustreznega časovnega obdobja za unovčenje v vsakem primeru oceni in sešteje vsaj naslednje:
the longest possible period that may elapse from the last collection of margins up to the declaration of default by the CCP or activation of the default management process by the CCP;
najdaljše možno obdobje, ki lahko preteče od zadnjega zbiranja kritij do razglasitve neplačila s strani CNS ali začetka postopka upravljanja v primeru neplačila s strani CNS;
the estimated period needed to design and execute the strategy for the management of the default of a clearing member according to the particularities of each class of financial instrument, including its level of liquidity and the size and concentration of the positions, and the markets the CCP will use to close-out or hedge completely a clearing member position;
ocenjeno obdobje, potrebno za oblikovanje in izvršitev strategije za upravljanje v primeru neplačila klirinškega člana glede na posebnosti vsakega razreda finančnih instrumentov, vključno z njegovo ravnjo likvidnosti ter velikostjo in koncentracijo pozicij, ter glede na trge, ki jih bo CNS uporabila za zaprtje pozicije klirinškega člana ali njeno popolno zavarovanje pred tveganjem;
where relevant, the period needed to cover the counterparty risk to which the CCP is exposed.’;
če je ustrezno, obdobje, potrebno za kritje tveganja nasprotne stranke, ki mu je CNS izpostavljena.“;
paragraph 4, point (b) is replaced by the following:
v odstavku 4 se točka (b) nadomesti z naslednjim:
such time horizon is at least two business days, or one business day where the conditions laid down in paragraph 1(c) are met.’.
takšno časovno obdobje znaša vsaj dva delovna dneva ali en delovni dan, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz odstavka 1(c).“.
OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p.
UL L 201, 27.7.2012, str.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 153/2013 of 19 December 2012 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on requirements for central counterparties (OJ L 52, 23.2.2013, p.
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 153/2013 z dne 19. decembra 2012 o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z regulativnimi tehničnimi standardi glede zahtev za centralne nasprotne stranke (UL L 52, 23.2.2013, str.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/823
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/823
amending Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 laying down the rules of organisation and procedure of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency
o spremembi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 771/2008 o predpisih glede organizacije in postopka komisije za pritožbe Evropske agencije za kemikalije
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC [1], and in particular Articles 93(4) and 132 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije in o spremembi Direktive 1999/45/ES ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1488/94 ter Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS in direktiv Komisije 91/155/EGS, 93/67/EGS, 93/105/ES in 2000/21/ES [1] in zlasti člena 93(4) in člena 132 Uredbe,
The review of Commission Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 [2] concluded that Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 should be amended in various respects.
Pregled Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 771/2008 [2] je pokazal, da bi bilo treba spremeniti nekatere dele Uredbe (ES) št. 771/2008.
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] empowers the Agency to take certain individual decisions and entrusts the Board of Appeal established under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 with the competence to decide upon appeals brought against the decisions referred to in Article 77(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Uredba (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] pooblašča Agencijo, da sprejme določene posamezne odločitve in podeljuje komisiji za pritožbe, ustanovljeni v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006, pristojnost za odločanje o pritožbah, vloženih proti odločitvam iz člena 77(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
It is therefore necessary to provide rules concerning the appeals brought against the decisions referred to in Article 77(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Zato je treba določiti pravila glede pritožb, vloženih proti odločitvam iz člena 77(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
Fees applicable for appeals against a decision by the Agency under Article 77 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 are established by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 564/2013 [4].
Pristojbine, ki se uporabljajo za pritožbe proti odločitvam agencije v skladu s členom 77 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012, so določene z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 564/2013 [4].
It is therefore necessary to provide rules on the fees applicable for appeals against a decision by the Agency under Article 77 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Zato je treba določiti pravila glede pristojbin, ki se uporabljajo za pritožbe proti odločitvam agencije v skladu s členom 77 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
Since the Board of Appeal is currently established as a permanent structure within the Agency, it is necessary to ensure that appeals can be processed at a satisfactory rate.
Ker je komisija za pritožbe trenutno stalna struktura znotraj agencije, je treba zagotoviti, da se pritožbe lahko obravnavajo dovolj hitro.
Therefore, the possibility to allocate appeals to additional or alternate members should be provided.
Zato bi bilo treba zagotoviti možnost dodelitve pritožb dodatnim ali nadomestnim članom.
Drawing on current practice, it is also appropriate to provide the possibility for the parties to find an amicable agreement between them.
Na podlagi sedanje prakse je tudi primerno zagotoviti možnost, da stranke dosežejo sporazumni dogovor.
In order to increase transparency, a member of the Board of Appeal should be appointed to facilitate the amicable agreement.
Za povečanje preglednosti bi moral biti imenovan član komisije za pritožbe, da se olajša sporazumni dogovor.
A summary of the amicable agreement should be publicly available on the Agency's website.
Povzetek sporazumnega dogovora bi moral biti javno dostopen na spletnem mestu agencije.
In order to ensure the independence of the Board of Appeal, it is necessary that the Registrar should be appointed directly by the Chairman of the Board of Appeal.
Za zagotovitev neodvisnosti komisije za pritožbe je nujno, da tajnika komisije za pritožbe neposredno imenuje predsednik komisije za pritožbe.
For reasons of legal certainty, it is also appropriate to clarify the existing provisions on the confidentiality requests, in particular that the elements requested in the announcement cannot be claimed confidential.
Zaradi pravne varnosti je tudi primerno pojasniti obstoječe določbe o zahtevah za varovanje poslovnih skrivnosti, zlasti to, da elementov, ki se zahtevajo v objavi, ni mogoče šteti za zaupne.
To ensure an effective participation of the interveners, the intervention procedure should be streamlined to ensure further clarity and the deadline for submitting the application to intervene should be extended.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega sodelovanja intervenientov bi bilo treba postopek posredovanja racionalizirati, da se zagotovi večja jasnost, in podaljšati rok za predložitev zahtevka za posredovanje v postopku.
In cases relating to Title VI Chapter 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the Member States application to intervene should be allowed without having to justify their interest in the result of the case.
V primerih, ki se nanašajo na poglavje 2 naslova VI Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006, bi bilo treba dovoliti, da države članice predložijo zahtevek za posredovanje v postopku, ne da bi morale utemeljiti svoje zanimanje za rezultat primera.
For reasons of legal certainty, it is appropriate to clarify the provisions on the costs in the sense that the parties bear their own costs.
Zaradi pravne varnosti je primerno pojasniti določbe o stroških, in sicer da vsaka stranka krije svoje stroške.
To ease access to justice and reduce costs, it is also appropriate to clarify that parties can be represented by any person with authority to act and not necessarily by a representative with power of attorney.
Za olajšanje dostopa do pravnega varstva in zmanjšanje stroškov je tudi primerno pojasniti, da lahko stranko zastopa katera koli oseba, ki lahko deluje v imenu stranke, in ne nujno zastopnik, ki ima pooblastilo.
Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Uredba (ES) št. 771/2008 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 25 May 2016.
V Bruslju, 25. maja 2016
Commission Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 of 1 August 2008 laying down the rules of organisation and procedure of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency (OJ L 206, 2.8.2008, p. 5).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 771/2008 z dne 1. avgusta 2008 o predpisih glede organizacije in postopka komisije za pritožbe Evropske agencije za kemikalije (UL L 206, 2.8.2008, str. 5).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 564/2013 of 18 June 2013 on the fees and charges payable to the European Chemicals Agency pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ L 167, 19.6.2013, p. 17).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 564/2013 z dne 18. junija 2013 o pristojbinah in taksah, ki se plačujejo Evropski agenciji za kemikalije na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dostopnosti na trgu in uporabi biocidnih proizvodov (UL L 167, 19.6.2013, str. 17).
Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 771/2008 se spremeni:
in Article 1 the following paragraph 4 is added:
V členu 1 se doda naslednji odstavek 4:
To ensure that the appeals can be processed at a satisfactory rate, the Chairman, after consultation of the Management Board of the Agency, may allocate the appeal to alternate or additional members.
Za zagotovitev, da se pritožbe lahko obravnavajo dovolj hitro, lahko predsednik po posvetovanju z upravnim odborom agencije dodeli pritožbo nadomestnim ali dodatnim članom.
In such cases, the Chairman may designate an alternate Chairman.’;
V takšnih primerih lahko predsednik imenuje svojega namestnika.“;
Amicable agreement
Sporazumni dogovor
In the interest of the procedure the Chairman of the Board of Appeal may invite the parties to reach an amicable agreement.
V interesu postopka lahko predsednik komisije za pritožbe stranke pozove k sklenitvi sporazumnega dogovora.
In that case the Chairman shall appoint a single member to facilitate the amicable agreement.
V navedenem primeru predsednik imenuje enega člana za olajšanje sklenitve sporazumnega dogovora.
The Chairman shall communicate the decision to appoint a single member to the parties.
Predsednik strankam sporoči odločitev o imenovanju enega člana.
If the parties reach an amicable agreement, the single member shall close the proceedings and a summary of the amicable agreement shall be published on the website of the Agency.
Če pogodbenici dosežeta sporazumni dogovor, ta član zaključi postopek, povzetek sporazumnega dogovora pa se objavi na spletnem mestu agencije.
In the absence of an amicable agreement within 2 months from the decision to allocate the case to a single member, the case shall be referred back to the Board of Appeal.’;
Če sporazumni dogovor ni dosežen v dveh mesecih od odločitve o dodelitvi primera enemu članu, se primer vrne nazaj komisiji za pritožbe.“;
the following Article 1b is inserted:
Vstavi se naslednji člen 1b:
Withdrawal of an appeal
Umik pritožbe
Where an appeal is withdrawn, the Chairman shall close the proceedings.’;
Če je pritožba umaknjena, predsednik zaključi postopek.“;
in Article 5, paragraphs 4 and 5 are replaced by the following:
V členu 5 se odstavka 4 in 5 nadomestita z naslednjim:
The staff of the Registry, including the Registrar, shall not participate in any proceedings of the Agency relating to decisions which may be the subject of appeals under Article 91(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 or under Article 77(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Osebje tajništva, vključno s tajnikom, ne sme sodelovati v nobenem postopku agencije v zvezi z odločitvami, ki bi lahko bile predmet pritožb na podlagi člena 91(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 ali člena 77(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
The Board of Appeal shall be assisted in the exercise of its duties by a Registrar, who shall be appointed by the Chairman.
Komisiji za pritožbe pri izvajanju njenih obveznosti pomaga tajnik, ki ga imenuje predsednik.
The Chairman shall have managerial and organisational powers to give directions to the Registrar on matters relating to the exercise of the functions of the Board of Appeal.
Predsednik ima poslovodne in organizacijske pristojnosti, da usmerja tajnika o zadevah v zvezi z izvajanjem nalog komisije za pritožbe.
in Article 6(1), point (g) is replaced by the following:
V členu 6(1) se točka (g) nadomesti z naslednjim:
where appropriate, an indication as to what information in the notice of appeal is to be regarded as confidential and why;’;
kadar je primerno, navedbo, katere informacije v obvestilu o pritožbi je treba šteti za zaupne in zakaj;“;