natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In case T-498/04 Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group v Council (Case T-498/04 Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group v Council [2009] ECR I-1969), the Council filed an appeal.
Zaradi celovitosti se zdijo koristna naslednja pojasnila: Splošno sodišče je v zadevi T-107/08, ENRC proti Svetu, ugotovilo, da dampinga ni bilo, ali pa vsaj, da bi morala bila ugotovljena stopnja dampinga nižja od tiste, izračunane v izpodbijani uredbi, zato je izpodbijano uredbo Sveta razglasilo za nično v celoti (zadeva T-107/08, ENRC proti Svetu, ZOdl.
Therefore, the annulment only took effect on the date at which the Court of Justice handed down its judgment on appeal (Case C-337/09 P Council v Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group [2012] ECR I-0000), which was on 19 July 2012.
2011, str.
In that judgment, the General Court, confirmed by the Court of Justice, found that the Commission and the Council were obliged to grant market-economy treatment to the applicant, which was the only Chinese company that had exported the product concerned during the investigation period.
II-8051, točke od 67 do 70).
In that case, contrary to the present case, the Commission and the Council had actually carried out the analysis of the market economy treatment claim and had rejected that request as unfounded.
Ko je Komisija uporabila metodo, ki jo je predpisalo Splošno sodišče, se je izkazalo, da ni bilo ne dampinga ne škode.
The Union Courts held that — contrary to the view expressed by the Commission and the Council — the claim actually was founded, and therefore normal value had to be calculated on the basis of the data provided by Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group.
Komisija zato ni formalno obnovila preiskave.
The Commission would normally have resumed the procedure, in order to propose to the Council to impose a duty for the future.
Sodišče je v zadevi C-351/04, Ikea (zadeva C-351/04, Ikea, ZOdl.
However, in the case at hand, the Commission (Commission Decision 2009/383/EC of 14 May 2009 suspending the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/2004 on imports of glyphosate originating in the People's Republic of China, OJ L 120, 15.5.2009, p. 20) and the Council (Implementing Regulation of the Council (EU) No 126/2010 of 11 February 2010 extending the suspension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1683/2004 on imports of glyphosate originating in the People's Republic of China, OJ L 40, 13.2.2010, p. 1) had decided in 2009 and 2010 to suspend the anti-dumping duty for the period until the end of its applicability on 30 September 2010, considering that injury was unlikely to resume due to the high profit levels of the Union industry.
2007, str.
Hence, there was no need to resume the procedure in view of the imposition of a duty for the future.
I-7723), razglasilo delno ničnost uredbe Sveta, in sicer v delu, v katerem je bila dajatev izračunana na podlagi tako imenovane tehnike „ničelne nastavitve“.
There was also no scope to resume the procedure in view of a re-imposition for the past: Contrary to the present case, there was no sampling.
Instituciji sta po odločitvi pritožbenega organa STO že v zgodnji fazi ponovno izračunali dajatev brez uporabe ničelne nastavitve in ugotovili, da do dampinga ni prišlo, ter s tem zaključili preiskavo brez uvedbe ukrepov (tj. dejansko sta novo dajatev določili na stopnji nič) (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 160/2002 z dne 28. januarja 2002 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2398/97 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Egipta, Indije in Pakistana, ter o ustavitvi postopka v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz Pakistana, UL L 26, 30.1.2002, str. 2).
Indeed, Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group was the only exporting producer that had sales to the Union market in the investigation period.
V zadevi T-498/04, Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group proti Svetu (zadeva T-498/04, Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group proti Svetu, ZOdl.
As the Commission and the Council would have been obliged to grant Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group market economy treatment, the Union Courts had annulled the finding of dumping.
2009, str.
Case T-348/05 JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky v Council (Case T-348/05 JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky v Council [2008] ECR II-159) is a very peculiar case.
I-1969), je Svet vložil pritožbo.
The Commission had initiated a partial interim review at the request of the Union industry, and had at that occasion broadened the scope of the products concerned, by including a different product.
Zato je razglasitev ničnosti začela veljati šele z datumom, na katerega je Sodišče izdalo sodbo o pritožbi (zadeva C-337/09 P, Svet proti Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group, ZOdl.
The General Court held that it was not possible to proceed in that manner, but that it was necessary to launch a separate investigation into the product that had been added.
2012), kar je bilo dne 19. julija 2012.
On the basis of the general principle of Union law of res iudicata, there was no scope for the institutions to resume the partial interim review following the annulment.
V navedeni sodbi je Splošno sodišče ugotovilo, kar je Sodišče tudi potrdilo, da bi Komisija in Svet vložniku, ki je bil v obdobju preiskave edini kitajski izvoznik zadevnega izdelka, morala odobriti tržnogospodarsko obravnavo.
See for example Council Regulation (EC) No 412/2009 of 18 May 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the People's Republic of China and Saudi Arabia, amending Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the Republic of Korea and terminating the anti-dumping proceeding in respect of such imports originating in Taiwan, OJ L 125, 25.1.2009, p. 1 (compliance with Huvis); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2012 of 21 June 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 954/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel originating in Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine, OJ L 165, 26.6.2012, p. 1 (compliance with Interpipe Nikopolsky).
V navedeni zadevi sta Komisija in Svet, v nasprotju z obravnavano zadevo, dejansko izvedla analizo zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo in ga zavrnila kot neutemeljenega.
See for example Case C-338/10 Gruenwald Logistik Services [2012] ECR I-0000 and the re-imposition of duties by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 158/2013 of 18 February 2013 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 49, 22.2.2013, p. 29).
Sodišči Unije sta menili, da je zahtevek, v nasprotju s stališčem Komisije in Sveta, dejansko utemeljen, zato je bilo treba izračunati normalno vrednost na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je predložila družba Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group.
See also the following examples: In case T-158/10 Dow v Council, the General Court found that there was no likelihood of continuation of dumping (Case T-158/10 Dow v Council [2012] ECR II-0000, paragraphs 47 and 59).
Običajno bi Komisija obnovila postopek, da bi lahko Svetu predlagala uvedbo dajatve za prihodnost.
In case T-107/04 Aluminium Silicon Mill Products v Council, the General Court found that there was no causal link between dumping and injury (Case T-107/04 Aluminium Silicon Mill Products v Council [2007] ECR II-672, paragraph 116).
Vendar pa sta se v tej zadevi Komisija (Sklep Komisije 2009/383/ES z dne 14. maja 2009 o opustitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1683/2004 na uvoz glifosata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, UL L 120, 15.5.2009, str. 20) in Svet (Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 126/2010 z dne 11. februarja 2010 o podaljšanju opustitve dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1683/2004 na uvoz glifosata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, UL L 40, 13.2.2010, str. 1) leta 2009 in 2010 odločila opustiti protidampinško dajatev za obdobje do izteka njene veljavnosti 30. septembra 2010, glede na to, da se škoda zaradi visokih stopenj dobička industrije Unije verjetno ne bo nadaljevala.
Pursuant to the general principle of Union law of res judicata, the Commission and the Council are bound by the findings of the Union Courts, where those can, on the basis of the facts in front of them, come to a definitive conclusion on dumping, injury, causal link and Union interest.
Zato v zvezi z uvedbo dajatve za prihodnost postopka ni bilo treba obnoviti.
The Commission and the Council can therefore not deviate from the Union Court's findings.
Prav tako ni bilo možnosti za obnovitev postopka v zvezi s ponovno uvedbo dajatve za nazaj: v nasprotju z obravnavano zadevo, vzorčenja ni bilo.
In such a situation, the investigation is closed by virtue of the judgment of the Union Courts, which come to the definitive conclusion that the complaint of the Union industry is unfounded in law.
Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group je bil dejansko edini proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je v obdobju preiskave prodajal na trg Unije.
Following those two judgments, there was therefore no scope for the Commission and the Council to resume an investigation, which is why no further steps were taken following those judgments.
Ker bi Komisija in Svet družbi Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group morala odobriti tržnogospodarsko obravnavo, sta sodišči Unije ugotovitev dampinga razglasili za nično.
Case 199/82 San Giorgio [1983] ECR 3595, paragraph 13.
Zadeva T-348/05, JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky proti Svetu (zadeva T-348/05, JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky proti Svetu, ZOdl.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/223 of 17 February 2016 establishing a procedure for assessing certain market economy treatment and individual treatment claims made by exporting producers from China and Vietnam, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 (OJ L 41, 18.2.2016, p. 3).
2008, str.
By virtue of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 301, 31.10.2006, p. 1) this CN code is replaced on 1 January 2007 by CN codes ex64035105, ex64035905, ex64039105 and ex64039905.
II-159), je zelo poseben primer.
As defined in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 286, 28.10.2005, p. 1).
Komisija je na zahtevo industrije Unije začela delni vmesni pregled, pri čemer je razširila obseg zadevnih izdelkov, in sicer z vključitvijo dodatnega izdelka.
The product coverage is determined in combining the product description in Article 1(1) and the product description of the corresponding CN codes taken together.
Splošno sodišče je menilo, da tak postopek ni mogoč in da je treba za dodani izdelek izvesti ločeno preiskavo.
The impact resistance shall be measured according to European Norms EN345 or EN346.
Na podlagi splošnega načela prava Unije res iudicata instituciji po razglasitvi ničnosti nista mogli obnoviti delnega vmesnega pregleda.
See footnote 43.
Glej na primer Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 412/2009 z dne 18. maja 2009 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Saudove Arabije, o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2852/2000 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom iz Republike Koreje in o zaključku protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom teh izdelkov s poreklom iz Tajvana, UL L 125, 25.1.2009, str. 1 (skladno s sodbo v zadevi Huvis); Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 540/2012 z dne 21. junija 2012 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 954/2006 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Hrvaške, Romunije, Rusije in Ukrajine, UL L 165, 26.6.2012, str. 1 (skladno z Interpipe Nikopolsky).
6403300039, 6403300089, 6403511190, 6403511590, 6403511990, 6403519190, 6403519590, 6403519990, 6403591190, 6403593190, 6403593590, 6403593990, 6403599190, 6403599590, 6403599990, 6403911199, 6403911399, 6403911699, 6403911899, 6403919199, 6403919399, 6403919699, 6403919899, 6403991190, 6403993190, 6403993390, 6403993690, 6403993890, 6403999199, 6403999329, 6403999399, 6403999629, 6403999699, 6403999829, 6403999899 and 6405100080
2012, točki 47 in 59).
The producer in Vietnam is reported as ‘General Shoes Ltd’.
Golden Star Co., Ltd.
supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility
o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, amending Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 680/2007 and (EC) No 67/2010 [1], and in particular Article 21 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope, spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 913/2010 in razveljavitvi uredb (ES) št. 680/2007 in (ES) št. 67/2010 [1], in zlasti člena 21 Uredbe,
On 7 January 2014 the Commission adopted Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014 [2] establishing transport funding priorities for the purpose of the multiannual and annual work programmes.
Komisija je 7. januarja 2014 sprejela Delegirano uredbo (EU) št. 275/2014 [2] o določitvi prednosti glede financiranja na področju prometa v okviru večletnih in letnih delovnih programov.
By its judgement of 17 March 2016 in Case C-286/14 European Parliament v Commission the Court of Justice of the European Union annulled Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014 and ordered that the effects of that Regulation be maintained until the entry into force, within a reasonable period, which may not exceed six months from the date of delivery of the judgment, of a new act intended to replace it.
V svoji sodbi z dne 17. marca 2016 v zadevi C-286/14 Evropski parlament proti Komisiji je Sodišče Evropske unije razglasilo ničnost Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 275/2014 in razsodilo, da se učinki navedene uredbe ohranijo, dokler ne bo v razumnem roku, ki ne sme preseči šestih mesecev od dneva razglasitve te sodbe, začel veljati nov akt, ki jo bo nadomestil.
According to Article 21(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013, the transport funding priorities should take into account the eligible actions contributing to projects of common interest in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] listed under Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013.
V skladu s členom 21(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013 bi prednostno financiranje na področju prometa moralo upoštevati upravičene ukrepe, ki prispevajo k projektom skupnega interesa v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1315/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], navedene v členu 7(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013.
The eligible actions listed in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 are further detailed in Articles 10 and 11 of that Regulation providing the maximum applicable funding rates for those actions.
Upravičeni ukrepi iz člena 7(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013 so podrobneje opredeljeni v členih 10 in 11 navedene uredbe, ki določata najvišje ravni financiranja, ki se uporabljajo za navedene ukrepe.
Projects of common interest as listed in Part I of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 are eligible to the multiannual work programmes referred to in Article 17(3) of that Regulation.
Projekti skupnega interesa, kot so navedeni v delu I Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 1316/2013, so upravičeni do večletnih delovnih programov iz člena 17(3) navedene uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 laying down the specific transport sectoral objectives, and considering that Article 21(3) of that Regulation empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with its Article 26 detailing, for the transport sector, the funding priorities to be reflected in the work programmes, this Delegated Regulation sets out such priorities to be reflected in multi-annual or annual work programmes in accordance with Article 17(3) of the said Regulation.
V skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013 o določitvi posebnih sektorskih ciljev v prometnem sektorju in upoštevajoč, da člen 21(3) navedene uredbe na Komisijo prenaša pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 26, ki za prometni sektor podrobno določa prednosti glede financiranja, ki se odrazijo v delovnih programih, ta delegirana uredba določa take prednosti, ki se odrazijo v večletnih ali letnih delovnih programih v skladu s členom 17(3) navedene uredbe.
Considering that financial instruments are to receive Union contribution under the annual work programmes, it is appropriate to include hereby a corresponding priority.
Glede na to, da bodo finančni instrumenti prejeli prispevek Unije na podlagi letnih delovnih programov, je primerno vključiti ustrezno prednost.
Programmes support actions listed in Article 5(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013, consisting of technical and administrative assistance expenses incurred by the Commission for the management of the Connecting Europe Facility and capped at 1 % of the financial envelope, will not be covered by the work programmes.
Ukrepi za podporo programov iz člena 5(2)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013, ki jih sestavljajo stroški za tehnično in upravno pomoč, ki jih ima Komisija pri upravljanju Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope in so omejeni na 1 % finančnih sredstev, ne bodo zajeti v delovnih programih.
However the programme support actions contributing to projects of common interest as provided for in Article 7(2) and referred to in Article 5(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 will be covered by the work programmes and are included hereby with a corresponding priority.
Vendar pa bodo ukrepi za podporo programov, ki prispevajo k projektom skupnega interesa, kot so predvideni v členu 7(2) in navedeni v členu 5(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013, zajeti v delovnih programih in so vključeni z ustrezno prednostjo.
All resources referred in Article 5(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013, including the resources transferred from the Cohesion Fund will be covered under the same work programmes.
Vsa sredstva iz člena 5(1)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013, vključno s sredstvi, prenesenimi iz Kohezijskega sklada, se bodo krila iz istih delovnih programov.
In order to allow for the timely adoption of the implementing acts provided for in Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 to ensure legal continuity of the Connecting Europe Facility — Transport sector — programme, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,
Da se zagotovi pravočasno sprejetje izvedbenih aktov iz člena 17(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013 za zagotovitev pravne kontinuitete programa na področju prometnega sektorja Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope, bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati dan po njeni objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije —
This Regulation establishes the funding priorities to be reflected in the multiannual and annual work programmes referred to in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 for the duration of the Connecting Europe Facility for eligible actions under Article 7(2) of that Regulation, as set out in the Annex.
Ta uredba določa prednosti glede financiranja, ki se odrazijo v večletnih in letnih delovnih programih iz člena 17 Uredbe (EU) št. 1316/2013 za čas trajanja Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope za ukrepe, upravičene na podlagi člena 7(2) navedene uredbe, kakor je navedeno v Prilogi.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014 of 7 January 2014 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility (OJ L 80, 19.3.2014, p. 1).
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 275/2014 z dne 7. januarja 2014 o spremembi Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 1316/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope (UL L 80, 19.3.2014, str. 1).
pre-identified projects on the Corridors of the Core Network (railways, inland waterways, roads, maritime and inland ports).
predhodno določeni projekti v koridorjih jedrnega omrežja (železnice, celinske plovne poti, ceste, pomorska in celinska pristanišča);
pre-identified projects on the other sections of the Core Network (railways, inland waterways, roads, maritime and inland ports).
predhodno določeni projekti na drugih odsekih jedrnega omrežja (železnice, celinske plovne poti, ceste, pomorska in celinska pristanišča);
rail interoperability.
interoperabilnost železniškega sistema;
deployment of ERTMS.
uvedba ERTMS.
Funding priorities for the objective of ensuring sustainable and efficient transport systems in the long run, with a view to preparing for expected future transport flows, as well as enabling all modes of transport to be decarbonised through transition to innovative low-carbon and energy-efficient transport technologies, while optimising safety:
Prednosti glede financiranja za dolgoročno zagotavljanje trajnostnih in učinkovitih prometnih sistemov zaradi priprave na pričakovane prihodnje prometne tokove in omogočanja razogljičenja vseh načinov prevoza s prehodom na inovativne nizkoogljične in energijsko učinkovite prometne tehnologije ob optimizaciji varnosti:
deployment of new technologies and innovation in all transport modes, with a focus on decarbonisation, safety and innovative technologies for the promotion of sustainability, operation, management, accessibility, multimodality and efficiency of the network;
uvajanje novih tehnologij in inovacij v vse načine prevoza, s poudarkom na razogljičenju, varnosti in inovativnih tehnologijah za spodbujanje trajnosti, delovanja, upravljanja, dostopnosti, večmodalnosti in učinkovitosti omrežja;
safe and secure infrastructure, including safe and secure parking on the road Core Network.
varna in varovana infrastruktura, vključno z varnimi in varovanimi parkirnimi mesti v jedrnem cestnem omrežju.
single European sky — SESAR;
enotno evropsko nebo – SESAR;
river information services;
rečne informacijske storitve;
intelligent transport services for road;
inteligentne prometne storitve za cestni promet;
vessel traffic monitoring and information systems;
sistemi spremljanja in obveščanja za ladijski promet;
actions implementing transport infrastructure in nodes of the Core Network, including urban nodes;
ukrepi za izgradnjo prometne infrastrukture na vozliščih jedrnega omrežja, vključno z urbanimi vozlišči;
connections to and development of multimodal logistics platforms.
povezave z večmodalnimi logističnimi platformami in njihov razvoj.
railways, inland waterways and roads projects on the Core Network including connections to inland and maritime ports and airports, as well as development of ports;
projekti v zvezi z železnicami, celinskimi plovnimi potmi in cestami v jedrnem omrežju, vključno s povezavami s celinskimi in pomorskimi pristanišči ter letališči in razvojem pristanišč;
projects on the Comprehensive Network (railways, inland waterways, roads, maritime and inland ports);
projekti v zvezi s celovitim omrežjem (železnice, celinske plovne poti, ceste, pomorska in celinska pristanišča);
projects to connect the trans-European transport network with infrastructure networks of the neighbouring countries, in particular related to cross-border sections (railways, inland waterways, roads, maritime and inland ports).
projekti za povezovanje vseevropskega prometnega omrežja z infrastrukturnimi omrežji sosednjih držav, zlasti v zvezi s čezmejnimi odseki (železnica, celinske plovne poti, ceste, pomorska in celinska pristanišča).
Deployment of new technologies and innovation, other than those covered by the multiannual work programme;
uvajanje novih tehnologij in inovacij, razen tistih, ki so vključene v večletni delovni program;
freight transport services;
storitve tovornega prometa;