natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The current review was limited to the examination of the definition of the product scope in order to clarify whether certain types of ST, in particular GST, fall within the scope of the original measures, as prolonged.
Ta pregled je bil omejen na preučitev opredelitve obsega izdelka, da se pojasni, ali nekatere vrste sukanca za šivanje, zlasti neobdelani sukanec za šivanje, spadajo na področje uporabe prvotnih ukrepov, kakor so bili podaljšani.
The applicant's claim was explicitly supported by one of the Union producers of HTY (DuraFiber) which represented 49 % of the Union production of HTY in the expiry review investigation.
Zahtevek vložnika je v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa izrecno podprl eden od proizvajalcev preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra v Uniji (družba DuraFiber), ki je predstavljal 49 % proizvodnje preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra v Uniji.
The representatives of the applicant were invited to present their case before the Commission.
Predstavniki vložnika so bili pozvani, da Komisiji predstavijo svoje argumente.
The meeting took place on 29 September 2016.
Sestanek je potekal 29. septembra 2016.
Parties concerned by the review
Strani, ki jih zadeva pregled
The four known Union producers of HTY, their association and the representative of the exporting country were informed by the Commission of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda obvestila štiri znane proizvajalce preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra v Uniji, njihovo združenje in predstavnika države izvoznice.
The Commission requested information from all the abovementioned parties and from those other parties who made themselves known within the time limit set in the Notice of Initiation.
Komisija je zahtevala informacije od vseh omenjenih strani in od tistih drugih strani, ki so se javile v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
The Commission also gave interested parties the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.
Poleg tega je Komisija dala vsem zainteresiranim stranem možnost, da pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
None of the Chinese exporting producers or their association came forward in the proceedings.
Nobeden od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov niti nobeno njihovo združenje se ni javilo v postopku.
No hearings were requested during the investigation by any of the parties.
Med preiskavo ni nobena stran zahtevala zaslišanja.
Amann Group was the sole importer of GST and user of HTY that came forward as interested party for this investigation.
Družba Amann Group je bila edini uvoznik neobdelanega sukanca za šivanje in uporabnik preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra, ki se je javil kot zainteresirana stran v tej preiskavi.
The company came forward on its own initiative and supported the applicant's request for the exclusion of the GST from the product scope of the existing measures.
Družba se je javila na lastno pobudo in je podprla vložnikov zahtevek za izključitev neobdelanega sukanca za šivanje iz obsega izdelka v okviru obstoječih ukrepov.
The party also opposed the claims made from the association of the Union producers of HTY, presented below in recitals (15) to (20).
Ta stran je poleg tega nasprotovala trditvam združenja proizvajalcev preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra v Uniji, navedenim v uvodnih izjavah (15) do (20).
None of the Union producers of the product concerned came forward during the review.
Nobeden od proizvajalcev zadevnega izdelka v Uniji se ni javil med pregledom.
The European Manmade Fibres Association (CIRFS) submitted comments opposing any change to the existing product definition.
Mednarodni odbor za umetno svilo in sintetična vlakna („CIRFS“) je nasprotoval vsakršni spremembi obstoječe opredelitve izdelka.
First, CIRFS claimed that the subject of the request would fall under the competence of the national Customs authorities in their role of implementing the basic Regulation, rather than giving rise to a product scope review.
Prvič, CIRFS je trdil, da predmet zahtevka sodi v pristojnost nacionalnih carinskih organov pri izvajanju osnovne uredbe, namesto da bi sprožil pregled obsega izdelka.
However, it should be noted that anti-dumping measures are imposed on specific products and that therefore an adequate product definition is a crucial element for their correct application.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da so protidampinški ukrepi uvedeni za določene izdelke in da je zato ustrezna opredelitev izdelka ključna za njihovo pravilno uporabo.
Pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the need for the continued imposition of the measures may be reviewed and in particular the product scope can be reassessed in order to clarify whether certain product types fall within the definition of the scope of an anti-dumping measure.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je mogoče pregledati potrebo po nadaljevanju ukrepov, zlasti pa je mogoče ponovno oceniti obseg izdelka, da se pojasni, ali nekatere vrste izdelka spadajo v opredelitev področja uporabe protidampinškega ukrepa.
Second, CIRFS claimed that the letter of support mentioned above in recital (7) came from DuraFiber, which is only one of the four complaining producers which requested the expiry review investigation.
Drugič, CIRFS je trdil, da je dopis o podpori iz uvodne izjave 7 poslala družba DuraFiber, ki je samo eden od štirih proizvajalcev pritožnikov, ki so zahtevali preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa.
Allegedly, the other three producers would be opposed to the request for review.
Preostali trije proizvajalci naj bi nasprotovali zahtevku za pregled.
However, since no evidence or specific letters in this respect were provided by other producers, the claim was therefore rejected.
Ker pa preostali proizvajalci niso predložili dokazov ali posebnih dopisov v zvezi s tem, je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
Third, CIRFS claimed that other users and/or importers could also take example from the request for partial interim review and also request the exclusion of other types of HTY with certain specific and particular characteristics.
Tretjič, CIRFS je trdil, da bi se lahko tudi drugi uporabniki in/ali uvozniki zgledovali po zahtevku za delni vmesni pregled ter prav tako zahtevali izključitev drugih vrst preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra z nekaterimi posebnimi lastnostmi.
In the opinion of CIRFS, the possibilities in this respect are endless and the prefix ‘ex’ should not be put before the CN code in order to avoid its fragmenting.
Po mnenju CIRFS so možnosti v zvezi s tem neskončne in pred oznako KN ne bi smeli dati predpone „ex“, da se prepreči njena razdrobljenost.
In this respect, in should be pointed out that the present review is limited to clarifying whether certain types of sewing thread (greige sewing thread) were part of the product scope.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je sedanji pregled omejen na pojasnitev, ali so bile nekatere vrste sukanca za šivanje (neobdelani sukanec za šivanje) del obsega izdelka.
Any interested party has the right to request a clarification whether certain products fall or not under the product scope of anti-dumping measures.
Vsaka zainteresirana stran ima pravico zahtevati pojasnitev, ali določeni izdelki spadajo v obseg izdelka, ki je predmet protidampinških ukrepov, ali ne.
The Commission will assess the merits of each request on an individual basis and open a proceeding when warranted.
Komisija bo ocenila prednosti vsakega zahtevka na individualni podlagi in začela postopek, če bo to upravičeno.
Fourth, CIRFS further claimed that the level of expertise regarding fibres and textiles at Customs in different Member States is allegedly not consistent, which puts doubt on the correct implementation of the anti-dumping measures and the detection of possible circumvention.
Četrtič, CIRFS je tudi trdil, da raven strokovnega znanja carinskih organov v različnih državah članicah v zvezi z vlakni in tekstilom ni usklajena, kar povzroča dvome glede pravilnega izvajanja protidampinških ukrepov in odkrivanja morebitnega izogibanja.
In this respect, it should be noted that all Customs officials in all Member States are bound by the same Union Customs framework.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba opozoriti, da vse carinske uradnike v vseh državah članicah zavezuje isti carinski okvir Unije.
If any party has concerns regarding the existence of possible circumvention practices, it may request the Commission to initiate a circumvention investigation pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation.
Če ima katera koli stran pomisleke glede obstoja morebitnih praks izogibanja, lahko od Komisije zahteva, da sproži preiskavo o izogibanju v skladu s členom 13(3) osnovne uredbe.
Given that CIRFS did not make such request and did not substantiate its allegations, the claim was therefore rejected.
Ker CIRFS ni vložil takega zahtevka in ni utemeljil svojih trditev, je bila ta trditev zato zavrnjena.
Fifth and finally, CIRFS claimed that the request was made at a very late stage and the support letter was drafted a few days after the opening of the expiry review.
Petič in nazadnje, CIRFS je tudi trdil, da je bil zahtevek vložen zelo pozno, dopis o podpori pa je bil sestavljen nekaj dni po začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa.
In this respect, it should be pointed out that the basic Regulation does not establish a time limit for requesting a review regarding the clarification of the product scope.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da osnovna uredba ne določa roka, v katerem se lahko zahteva pregled za pojasnilo obsega izdelka.
The product concerned, as defined in Article 1(1) of the expiry review Regulation, is high tenacity yarn of polyesters (other than sewing thread), not put up for retail sale, including monofilament of less than 67 decitex originating in the PRC (‘the product concerned’ or ‘HTY’) currently falling within CN code 54022000.
Zadevni izdelek, kakor je opredeljen v členu 1(1) uredbe o pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, je preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra (razen sukanca za šivanje), ki ni pripravljena za prodajo na drobno, vključno z monofilamenti številke manj kot 67 deciteksov, s poreklom iz LRK („zadevni izdelek“ ali „preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra“), trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN 54022000.
Note 5 to Section XI of the Combined Nomenclature defines ‘sewing thread’ (ST) as follows:
Opomba 5 oddelka XI kombinirane nomenklature opredeljuje „sukanec za šivanje“, kot sledi:
‘… the expression “sewing thread” means multiple (folded) or cabled yarn:
„… z izrazom ‚sukanec za šivanje‘ [je] mišljena dvojna, večnitna ali pramenska preja:
Put up on supports (for example, reels, tubes) of a weight (including support) not exceeding 1000 g;
navita na podlago (npr. motke, cevke), mase (vključno s podlago) do vključno 1000 g;
Dressed for use as sewing thread; and
pripravljena (površinsko obdelana) za uporabo kot sukanec za šivanje in
With a final “Z” twist.’
s končnim ‚Z‘ sukanjem.“
In its request for review, the applicant claimed that ‘greige sewing thread’ (‘the product under review’ or ‘GST’), which is undyed and/or unfinished sewing thread in the state following final plying, should not fall within the scope of the measures.
V zahtevku za pregled je vložnik trdil, da „neobdelani sukanec za šivanje“ („izdelek, ki se pregleduje“), ki je nebarvan in/ali nedokončan sukanec za šivanje, kakršen je po končnem sukanju, ne bi smel spadati v področje uporabe ukrepov.
The applicant explained that the Slovenian customs authorities could not accept declaring the product under review as ST, as the weight of the imported products exceeded the 1000 g limit (including support) and would thus not meet the above mentioned (a) condition defined in Section XI — Note 5 from the Combined Nomenclature.
Vložnik je pojasnil, da slovenski carinski organi niso mogli sprejeti deklariranja izdelka, ki se pregleduje, kot sukanca za šivanje, saj je masa uvoženih izdelkov presegla mejo 1000 g (vključno s podlago) in zato izdelki ne bi izpolnjevali zgoraj navedenega pogoja iz točke (a), opredeljenega v opombi 5 oddelka XI kombinirane nomenklature.
The product under investigation is actually imported with a weight not exceeding 2000 g (including support).
Masa uvoženega izdelka v preiskavi je bila pravzaprav do vključno 2000 g (vključno s podlago).
C. FINDINGS OF THE REVIEW
C. UGOTOVITVE PREGLEDA
In order to assess whether GST was covered by the original measures, the Commission examined whether GST and HTY share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and end-uses.
Da bi se ocenilo, ali so prvotni ukrepi zajemali neobdelani sukanec za šivanje, je Komisija preučila, ali imata neobdelani sukanec za šivanje in preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter končne uporabe.
The interchangeability and competition between GST and HTY was also assessed.
Prav tako je bila ocenjena zamenljivost in konkurenca med neobdelanim sukancem za šivanje in prejo visoke trdnosti iz poliestra.
All information with respect to the scope of the existing anti-dumping measures was also collected and verified.
Zbrane in preverjene so bile tudi vse informacije o področju uporabe obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov.
HTY is the basic material for the production of ST, which is therefore a downstream product of the product subject to measures.
Preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra je osnovni material za proizvodnjo sukanca za šivanje, ki je zato izdelek v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu izdelka, za katerega veljajo ukrepi.
Consequently, the required machinery for the production of the product under review (GST) differs completely from that of the product concerned (HTY).
Zato so stroji, ki so potrebni za proizvodnjo izdelka, ki se pregleduje (neobdelanega sukanca za šivanje), popolnoma drugačni od strojev za zadevni izdelek (prejo visoke trdnosti iz poliestra).
This was confirmed during a verification visit to a European manufacturer, Amann Group, and during the verification visits to the Union producers of the product concerned in the context of the recent expiry review investigation of the measures in force.
To je bilo potrjeno med preveritvenim obiskom evropskega proizvajalca Amann Group in med preveritvenimi obiski proizvajalcev zadevnega izdelka v Uniji v okviru nedavne preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka veljavnih ukrepov.
Furthermore, the investigation revealed that GST, since it consists of HTY that has been ‘Z’ twisted in a certain way to form a sewing thread, it is no longer appropriate for the uses to which HTY is typically an input.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da neobdelani sukanec za šivanje ni več primeren za uporabe, pri katerih je vhodna surovina običajno preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra, saj neobdelani sukanec za šivanje nastane iz preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra z „Z“ sukanjem na določen način, da se oblikuje sukanec za šivanje.
In fact, the product under review meets the requirements to be considered in substance as ST, a product excluded from the scope of the original measures, although it does not fulfil two conditions of the relevant section note of the Combined Nomenclature on ‘sewing thread’: (1) its weight exceeds 1000 grams at importation when put up on a support — a plastic, perforated bobbin on which the product is loosely wound for purposes of later dyeing and dressing; and (2) it is not dressed for use as ‘sewing thread’.
Dejstvo je, da izdelek, ki se pregleduje, izpolnjuje zahteve, da se vsebinsko šteje kot sukanec za šivanje, tj. izdelek, ki je bil izključen iz področja uporabe prvotnih ukrepov, čeprav ne izpolnjuje dveh pogojev iz ustrezne opombe oddelka kombinirane nomenklature o „sukancu za šivanje“: 1) njegova masa presega 1000 gramov ob uvozu, kadar je na podlagi, tj. plastičnem perforiranem vretenu, na katerega je izdelek ohlapno navit za namene poznejšega barvanja in površinske obdelave; in 2) ni pripravljen (površinsko obdelan) za uporabo kot „sukanec za šivanje“.
However, unlike the above two conditions, Z-twisting is a determinant factor for the applications of the product.
Vendar je za razliko od zgornjih pogojev „Z“ sukanje odločilni dejavnik za uporabe izdelka.
The manufacturing of GST requires that two or more HTY undergo a Z-twisting process that changes in an irreversible way the physical characteristics of the HTY to an extent that makes the twisted product inappropriate to be used in the place of a HTY.
Proizvodnja neobdelanega sukanca za šivanje zahteva, da se dve preji visoke trdnosti iz poliestra ali več podvržeta postopku „Z“ sukanja, ki nepovratno spremeni fizikalne lastnosti preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra, tako da sukani izdelek ni primeren za uporabo namesto preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra.
In fact, the Z-twisting in itself in essence transforms the HTY into a type (semi-finished) of sewing thread (GST) that is ready for its later colouring and/or lubrication.
„Z“ sukanje dejansko preoblikuje prejo visoke trdnosti iz poliestra v vrsto (polizdelanega) sukanca za šivanje (neobdelani sukanec za šivanje), ki je pripravljen za poznejše barvanje in/ali premazanje.
Once GST is manufactured, the process is irreversible.
Ko je neobdelani sukanec za šivanje proizveden, je postopek nepovraten.
Thus, there is no interchangeability between HTY (the product concern) and GST (the product under review).
Zato preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra (zadevni izdelek) in neobdelani sukanec za šivanje (izdelek, ki se pregleduje) nista zamenljiva.
Accordingly, the above findings show that GST and HTY are two different products.
Zgornje ugotovitve zato kažejo, da sta neobdelani sukanec za šivanje in preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra dva različna izdelka.
Furthermore, the Commission recalls that the present review investigation was limited to the clarification of the product scope and that it found that GST should not have been covered by the definition of scope in the original measured.
Komisija poleg tega opozarja, da je sedanja preiskava v zvezi s pregledom omejena na pojasnitev obsega izdelka in da je ugotovila, da neobdelani sukanec za šivanje ne bi smel biti zajet v opredelitvi področja uporabe prvotnih ukrepov.
D. CONCLUSION ON PRODUCT SCOPE
D. SKLEP O OBSEGU IZDELKA
The review investigation has showed that the product concerned in the original investigation, HTY, and the product under review, GST, are two different products.
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je pokazala, da sta zadevni izdelek v prvotni preiskavi (preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra) in izdelek, ki se pregleduje (neobdelani sukanec za šivanje), dva različna izdelka.
Furthermore, GST was never intended to be in the scope of the anti-dumping investigation on HTY and did not form part of the analysis on which the findings concerning dumping and injury were originally based.
Poleg tega ni bilo nikoli mišljeno, da bi protidampinška preiskava o preji visoke trdnosti iz poliestra zajela neobdelani sukanec za šivanje, slednji pa ni bil vključen v analizo, na kateri so prvotno temeljile ugotovitve glede dampinga in škode.
The change in the definition of the product scope in the original Regulation proposed by the applicant, namely, to replace the general exclusion of ST in the product definition with that of GST, coupled with the introduction of a maximum bobbin weight of 2 kg cannot, however, be accepted.
Vendar spremembe opredelitve obsega izdelka iz prvotne uredbe, ki jo predlaga vložnik, tj. da se v opredelitvi izdelka splošna izključitev sukanca za šivanje nadomesti s splošno izključitvijo neobdelanega sukanca za šivanje ter da se uvede največja masa vretena, in sicer 2 kg, ni mogoče sprejeti.
Such modification would artificially enlarge the scope of the original measures, since it would subject all ST other than GST to the duties.
Taka sprememba bi umetno razširila področje uporabe prvotnih ukrepov, saj bi dajatve začele veljati za vse sukance za šivanje, razen za neobdelani sukanec za šivanje.
Furthermore, another importer that made itself known in the review proceedings suggested an even higher threshold of less than 2,5 kg because it imports on bobbins of that weight.
Poleg tega je drug uvoznik, ki se je javil v postopku pregleda, predlagal še višji prag, in sicer manj kot 2,5 kg, saj uvaža izdelke na vretenih z navedeno maso.
It is therefore appropriate to amend the wording of the product definition in the anti-dumping measures in force as to create clarity on the exclusion of both ST and GST, the latter being an intermediate product in the production process of ST.
Zato je primerno spremeniti besedilo opredelitve izdelka v veljavnih protidampinških ukrepih, da se pojasni, da sta izključena tako sukanec za šivanje kot neobdelani sukanec za šivanje, pri čemer je slednji vmesni izdelek v postopku proizvodnje sukanca za šivanje.
Moreover, in order to prevent any future claims with respect to the specific weight restriction of GST, the specific weight restriction should be removed from the definition of the product concerned.
Da se preprečijo morebitne prihodnje trditve v zvezi s posebnimi omejitvami glede mase neobdelanega sukanca za šivanje, bi bilo treba iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka umakniti specifično omejitev mase.
On the basis of the above, the definition of the product concerned should be as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega bi morala biti opredelitev zadevnega izdelka, kot sledi:
The product concerned is high tenacity yarn of polyesters not put up for retail sale, including monofilament of less than 67 decitex (excluding sewing thread and ‘Z’-twisted multiple (folded) or cabled yarn, intended for the production of sewing threads, ready for dyeing and for receiving a finishing treatment, loosely wound on a plastic perforated tube), currently falling within CN Code ex54022000 (TARIC code 5402200010) and originating in the People's Republic of China.
Zadevni izdelek je preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra, ki ni pripravljena za prodajo na drobno, vključno z monofilamenti številke manj kot 67 deciteksov (razen sukanca za šivanje ter dvojne, večnitne ali pramenske preje z „Z“ sukanjem, namenjene za proizvodnjo sukanca za šivanje, pripravljene za barvanje in končno obdelavo, ohlapno navite na plastično perforirano cevko), trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN ex54022000 (oznaka TARIC 5402200010), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Following definitive disclosure, the applicant made comments and suggestions on the proposed amended product definition.
Po dokončnem razkritju je vložnik predložil pripombe in predloge glede predlagane spremembe opredelitve izdelka.
The applicant recalled its concern regarding the possible difficulties at practical implementation of measures by the national customs authorities as well the most adequate differentiator for excluding greige sewing thread from the product definition.
Vložnik je opozoril na svoj pomislek v zvezi z morebitnimi težavami pri praktičnem izvajanju ukrepov s strani nacionalnih carinskih organov kot tudi na najprimernejši razlikovalni dejavnik za izključitev neobdelanega sukanca za šivanje iz opredelitve izdelka.
The investigation concluded that the term ‘ready for dyeing and for receiving a finishing treatment’ adequately describes the physical characteristics of the ‘“Z”-twisted multiple (folded) or cabled yarn’, clarifying that the multiple (folded) or cabled yarn is only ‘Z’-twisted but not dyed nor finished.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da besedilo „pripravljena za barvanje in končno obdelavo“ ustrezno opiše fizikalne lastnosti „dvojne, večnitne ali pramenske preje z ‚Z‘ sukanjem“, saj se pojasni, da ima dvojna, večnitna ali pramenska preja le „Z“ sukanje, ni pa barvana ali dokončno obdelana.
The term ‘loosely wound on’ describes one of the two characteristics of the packaging type.
Besedilo „ohlapno navita na“ opisuje eno od dveh lastnosti vrste pakiranja.
The other characteristic of the packaging type is described by the term ‘a plastic perforated tube’.
Drugo lastnost vrste pakiranja opisuje besedilo „plastična perforirana cevka“.