natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It follows from the principle of free movement of goods that it is essential that the proprietor of an EU trade mark not be entitled to prohibit its use by a third party in relation to goods which have been put into circulation in the European Economic Area, under the trade mark, by him or with his consent, save where there exist legitimate reasons for the proprietor to oppose further commercialisation of the goods.
Iz načela prostega pretoka blaga izhaja, da je bistveno, da imetnik blagovne znamke EU nima pravice, da tretji osebi prepove njeno uporabo v zvezi z blagom, ki ga je imetnik dal v promet v Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru s to blagovno znamko ali se je to zgodilo z njegovim soglasjem, razen če obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, da imetnik nasprotuje nadaljnji komercializaciji blaga.
In order to ensure legal certainty and safeguard legitimately acquired trade mark rights, it is appropriate and necessary to lay down, without prejudice to the principle that the later trade mark cannot be enforced against the earlier trade mark, that proprietors of EU trade marks should not be entitled to oppose the use of a later trade mark if the later trade mark was acquired at a time when the earlier trade mark could not be enforced against the later trade mark.
Brez poseganja v načelo, da poznejše blagovne znamke ni mogoče uveljavljati zoper prejšnjo blagovno znamko, je zaradi zagotavljanja pravne varnosti in zaščite legitimno pridobljenih pravic iz blagovne znamke ustrezno in nujno določiti, da imetniki blagovnih znamk EU ne bi smeli imeti pravice nasprotovati uporabi poznejše blagovne znamke, če je bila poznejša blagovna znamka pridobljena v času, ko prejšnje blagovne znamke ni bilo mogoče uveljavljati zoper poznejšo.
There is no justification for protecting EU trade marks or, as against them, any trade mark which has been registered before them, except where the trade marks are actually used.
Ni razloga za varstvo blagovnih znamk EU ali katere koli blagovne znamke, registrirane pred njimi, razen če se blagovne znamke dejansko uporabljajo.
For reasons of equity and legal certainty, the use of an EU trade mark in a form that differs in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of that mark in the form in which it is registered should be sufficient to preserve the rights conferred regardless of whether the trade mark in the form as used is also registered.
Zaradi pravičnosti in pravne varnosti bi morala uporaba blagovne znamke EU v obliki, ki se razlikuje v elementih, ki ne spreminjajo razlikovalnega značaja te znamke v obliki, v kateri je registrirana, zadoščati, da se ohranijo podeljene pravice, ne glede na to, ali je registrirana tudi blagovna znamka v obliki, ki se uporablja.
An EU trade mark is to be regarded as an object of property which exists separately from the undertakings whose goods or services are designated by it.
Blagovna znamka EU bi se morala obravnavati kot predmet premoženja, ki obstaja ločeno od podjetij, katerih blago ali storitve označuje.
Accordingly, it should be capable of being transferred, of being charged as security in favour of a third party and of being the subject matter of licences.
V skladu s tem bi morala biti prenosljiva, uporabljiva kot predmet zavarovanja v korist tretje stranke ter kot predmet licenc.
Administrative measures are necessary at Union level for implementing in relation to every trade mark the trade mark law laid down by this Regulation.
Upravni ukrepi na ravni Unije so nujni za izvajanje prava o blagovnih znamkah, določenega s to uredbo, pri vsaki blagovni znamki.
It is therefore essential, while retaining the Union's existing institutional structure and balance of powers, to provide for a European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘the Office’) which is independent in relation to technical matters and has legal, administrative and financial autonomy.
Nujno je torej, da se ob ohranjanju obstoječe institucionalne strukture in ravnovesja moči znotraj Unije predvidi Urad Evropske unije za intelektualno lastnino („Urad“) ki je neodvisen pri reševanju tehničnih problemov in je pravno, upravno in finančno samostojen.
To this end it is necessary and appropriate that the Office should be a body of the Union having legal personality and exercising the powers which are conferred on it by this Regulation, and that it should operate within the framework of Union law without detracting from the competences exercised by the Union institutions.
Torej je potrebno in primerno, da gre za organ Unije s pravno osebnostjo in ki ima izvedbena pooblastila, ki mu jih podeljuje ta uredba, in da deluje v okviru zakonodaje Unije, ne da bi se zmanjševale pristojnosti institucij Unije.
EU trade mark protection is granted in relation to specific goods or services whose nature and number determine the extent of protection afforded to the trade mark proprietor.
Varstvo pod blagovno znamko EU se prizna specifičnemu blagu ali storitvam, obseg varstva, ki se odobri imetniku blagovne znamke, pa določata narava in količina tega blaga ali storitev.
It is therefore essential to lay down rules for the designation and classification of goods and services in this Regulation and to ensure legal certainty and sound administration by requiring that the goods and services for which trade mark protection is sought are identified by the applicant with sufficient clarity and precision to enable the competent authorities and economic operators, on the basis of the application alone, to determine the extent of the protection applied for.
Zato je bistveno, da se v tej uredbi določijo pravila za določitev in razvrstitev blaga in storitev ter da se zagotovita pravna varnost in dobro upravljanje, tako da se od prijavitelja zahteva, da dovolj jasno in natančno opredeli blago in storitve, ki jih želi zaščititi z blagovno znamko, da bodo pristojni organi in gospodarski subjekti lahko že na podlagi same prijave določili obseg varstva, za katero je vložena prijava.
Proprietors of EU trade marks, which because of the practice of the Office prior to 22 June 2012 were registered in respect of the entire heading of a class of the system of classification established by the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, should be given the possibility to adapt their lists of goods and services in order to ensure that the content of the Register meets the requisite standard of clarity and precision in accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Imetniki blagovnih znamk EU, ki so zaradi prakse Urada pred 22. junijem 2012 registrirane za celoten naslov razreda sistema klasifikacije uvedenega z Nicejskim aranžmajem o mednarodni klasifikaciji proizvodov in storitev zaradi registracije znamk z dne 15. junija 1957 bi morali imeti možnost, da prilagodijo svoje sezname blaga in storitev.
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in registering an EU trade mark, it is appropriate to lay down a regime of optional EU and national trade mark searches that should be flexible in terms of user needs and preferences.
Tako bi zagotovili, da vsebina registra izpolnjuje zahtevani standard jasnosti in natančnosti v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije.
The optional EU and national trade mark searches should be complemented by the making available of all-encompassing, fast and powerful search engines for the use of the public free of charge within the context of cooperation between the Office and the central industrial property offices of the Member States, including the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property.
Da bi se izognili nepotrebnim zamudam pri registraciji blagovne znamke EU je ustrezno določiti prostovoljni sistem poizvedbo blagovnih znamkah EU in nacionalnih znamkah in tako zagotoviti večjo prilagodljivost sistema potrebam in željam uporabnikov.
It is necessary to ensure that parties who are affected by decisions made by the Office are protected by the law in a manner which is suited to the special character of trade mark law.
Hkrati z možnostjo poizvedbe, kar zadeva blagovne znamke EU in nacionalne znamke, bi morali biti na voljo tudi obsežni, hitri in zmogljivi iskalniki, brezplačno dostopni javnosti, in sicer v okviru sodelovanja med Uradom in glavnimi uradi držav članic za industrijsko lastnino, vključno z Uradom Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino.
To that end, provision should be made for an appeal to lie from decisions of the various decision-making instances of the Office.
Potrebno je zagotoviti, da so stranke, ki jih zadevajo odločitve Urada, pravno varovane na način, prilagojen posebni naravi prava blagovnih znamk.
A Board of Appeal of the Office should decide on the appeal.
Tako bi moralo biti poskrbljeno za pritožbo zoper odločitve na različnih stopnjah odločanja.
Decisions of the Boards of Appeal should, in turn, be amenable to actions before the General Court, which has jurisdiction to annul or to alter the contested decision.
Odbor za pritožbe Urada bi moral odločiti o pritožbi.
In order to ensure the protection of EU trade marks the Member States should designate, having regard to their own national system, as limited a number as possible of national courts of first and second instance having jurisdiction in matters of infringement and validity of EU trade marks.
Odločitve odborov za pritožbe pa bi morale biti podvržene postopkom pred Sodiščem, ki je pristojno za razveljavitev ali spremembo izpodbijane odločitve.
It is essential that decisions regarding the validity and infringement of EU trade marks have effect and cover the entire area of the Union, as this is the only way of preventing inconsistent decisions on the part of the courts and the Office and of ensuring that the unitary character of EU trade marks is not undermined.
Države članice bi morale zaradi zagotovitve varstva blagovnih znamk EU ob upoštevanju lastnega nacionalnega sistema oblikovati kar najbolj omejeno število nacionalnih sodišč prve in druge stopnje s pristojnostmi v zadevah o kršitvah in veljavnosti blagovnih znamk EU.
The provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9] should apply to all actions at law relating to EU trade marks, save where this Regulation derogates from those rules.
Bistveno je, da odločitve o veljavnosti in kršitvi blagovnih znamk EU učinkujejo in pokrivajo celotno področje Unije, saj je to edini način preprečevanja nedoslednih odločitev sodišč in Urada ter zagotavljanja, da enotni značaj blagovnih znamk EU ni razvrednoten.
Contradictory judgments should be avoided in actions which involve the same acts and the same parties and which are brought on the basis of an EU trade mark and parallel national trade marks.
Določbe Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9] bi morale veljati za vsa dejanja pred sodišči, povezana z blagovnimi znamkami EU, razen če ta uredba odstopa od navedenih določb.
For this purpose, when the actions are brought in the same Member State, the way in which this is to be achieved is a matter for national procedural rules, which are not prejudiced by this Regulation, whilst when the actions are brought in different Member States, provisions modelled on the rules on lis pendens and related actions of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 appear appropriate.
Izogniti bi se bilo treba nasprotujočim sodbam v tožbah, ki zadevajo ista dejanja in iste stranke in ki so vložene na podlagi blagovne znamke EU in paralelnih nacionalnih blagovnih znamk.
With the aim of promoting convergence of practices and of developing common tools, it is necessary to establish an appropriate framework for cooperation between the Office and the industrial property offices of the Member States, including the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property, defining key areas of cooperation and enabling the Office to coordinate relevant common projects of interest to the Union and the Member States and to finance, up to a maximum amount, those projects.
Način doseganja tega namena, ko so tožbe vložene v isti državi članici, je stvar nacionalne procesne zakonodaje, na katero ta uredba ne vpliva, medtem ko se takrat, ko so tožbe vložene v različnih državah članicah, zdijo primerne določbe, izoblikovane na podlagi pravil o litispendenci in sorodnih tožbah iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012.
For users of the Union regime laid down in this Regulation, the projects, particularly the databases for search and consultation purposes, should provide additional, inclusive, efficient tools that are free of charge to comply with the specific requirements arising from the unitary character of the EU trade mark.
Navedene dejavnosti sodelovanja bi morale koristiti podjetjem, ki uporabljajo sisteme blagovnih znamk v Evropi.
It is desirable to facilitate friendly, expeditious and efficient dispute resolution by entrusting the Office with the establishment of a mediation centre the services of which could be used by any person with the aim of achieving a friendly settlement of disputes relating to EU trade marks and Community designs by mutual agreement.
Projekti, zlasti zbirke podatkov, ki se uporabljajo za poizvedbe in posvetovanje, bi morali uporabnikom sistema Unije iz te uredbe zagotavljati dodatna, vključujoča, učinkovita in brezplačna orodja za izpolnjevanje specifičnih zahtev, ki izhajajo iz enotnega značaja blagovne znamke EU.
The setting up of the EU trade mark system has resulted in increased financial burdens for the central industrial property offices and other authorities of the Member States.
Zaželeno je, da bi za spodbujanje mirnega, hitrega in učinkovitega reševanja sporov Uradu zaupali nalogo, da vzpostavi center za mediacijo, katerega storitve bi lahko uporabljali vsi, ki bi želeli doseči poravnavo, kar zadeva spore v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami EU in modeli Skupnosti.
The additional costs are related to the handling of a higher number of opposition and invalidity proceedings involving EU trade marks or brought by proprietors of such trade marks; to the awareness-raising activities linked to the EU trade mark system; as well as to activities intended to ensure the enforcement of EU trade mark rights.
Vzpostavitev sistema blagovnih znamk EU pomeni večjo finančno obremenitev glavnih uradov za industrijsko lastnino in drugih organov v državah članicah.
It is, therefore, appropriate to ensure that the Office offset part of the costs incurred by Member States for the role they play in ensuring the smooth functioning of the EU trade mark system.
Dodatni stroški so povezani z obravnavanjem večjega števila postopkov ugovora in ugotavljanja ničnosti, povezanih z blagovnimi znamkami EU ali sproženih s strani imetnikov teh blagovnih znamk, pa tudi z dejavnostmi za ozaveščanje o sistemu blagovnih znamk EU in dejavnostmi, s katerimi se zagotavlja uveljavljanje pravic iz blagovne znamke EU.
The payment of such offsetting should be subject to the submission, by Member States, of relevant statistical data.
Zato je ustrezno zagotoviti, da Urad delno izravna stroške, ki jih imajo države članice zaradi svoje vloge pri zagotavljanju nemotenega delovanja sistema blagovnih znamk EU.
In order to guarantee the full autonomy and independence of the Office, it is considered necessary to grant it an autonomous budget whose revenue comes principally from fees paid by the users of the system.
Znesek izravnave stroškov ne bi smel biti tako visok, da bi Uradu povzročil proračunski primanjkljaj.
However, the Union budgetary procedure remains applicable as far as any subsidies chargeable to the general budget of the Union are concerned.
Za zagotovitev polne samostojnosti in neodvisnosti Urada velja, da mu je potrebno dodeliti samostojni proračun, katerega prihodki izvirajo predvsem iz pristojbin, ki jih plačujejo uporabniki sistema.
Moreover, the auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors.
Proračunski postopek Unije pa se uporablja pri subvencijah iz splošnega proračuna Unije.
In the interest of sound financial management, the accumulation by the Office of significant budgetary surpluses should be avoided.
Poleg tega mora revizijo računovodskih izkazov izvajati Računsko sodišče.
That reserve should only be used to ensure the continuity of the tasks of the Office as specified in this Regulation.
To ne bi smelo vplivati na ohranitev finančne rezerve Urada, ki pokriva enoletne operativne odhodke ter s katero se zagotavljata neprekinjeno opravljanje njegovih dejavnosti in opravljanje njegovih nalog.
Given the essential importance of the amounts of fees payable to the Office for the functioning of the EU trade mark system and its complementary relationship as regards national trade mark systems, it is necessary to set those fee amounts directly in this Regulation in the form of an annex.
To rezervo bi bilo treba uporabiti le za zagotavljanje neprekinjenega opravljanja nalog Urada v skladu s to uredbo.
The amounts of the fees should be fixed at a level which ensures that: first, the revenue they produce is in principle sufficient for the budget of the Office to be balanced; second, there is coexistence and complementarity between the EU trade mark and the national trade mark systems, also taking into account the size of the market covered by the EU trade mark and the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises; and third, the rights of proprietors of an EU trade mark are enforced efficiently in the Member States.
Zneski pristojbin, ki se plačujejo Uradu za delovanje sistema blagovnih znamk EU in njegovo dopolnjevanje v zvezi z nacionalnimi sistemi blagovnih znamk, so bistvenega pomena, zato jih je treba določiti neposredno v tej Uredbi v obliki priloge.
In order to ensure an effective, efficient and expeditious examination and registration of EU trade mark applications by the Office using procedures which are transparent, thorough, fair and equitable, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the details on the procedures for filing and examining an opposition and on the procedures governing the amendment of the application.
Zneski pristojbin bi morali biti določeni na ravni, ki zagotavlja: prvič, da prihodek, ki ga zagotavljajo, načeloma zadošča za uravnotežen proračun Urada; drugič, da sistema blagovnih znamk EU in nacionalnih sistemov blagovnih znamk soobstajata in se dopolnjujeta ob upoštevanju velikosti trga, ki ga pokriva blagovna znamka EU, in potreb malih in srednjih podjetij; ter tretjič, da se učinkovito uveljavljajo pravice imetnikov blagovne znamke EU v državah članicah.
In order to ensure that an EU trade mark can be revoked or declared invalid in an effective and efficient way by means of transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedures, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the procedures for revocation and declaration of invalidity.
Da bi lahko Urad na podlagi preglednih, temeljitih, poštenih in pravičnih postopkov učinkovito, uspešno in hitro preizkusil ter registriral prijave blagovnih znamk EU, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske unije (PDEU) sprejme akte v zvezi z določitvijo podrobnosti o postopkih za vložitev in preizkus ugovora ter postopki, ki urejajo spremembe prijave.
In order to allow for an effective, efficient and complete review of decisions of the Office by the Boards of Appeal by means of a transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedure which takes into account the principles laid down in this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the formal content of the notice of appeal, the procedure for the filing and examination of an appeal, the formal content and form of the Board of Appeal's decisions, and the reimbursement of the appeal fees.
Da bi se blagovna znamka EU na podlagi preglednih, temeljitih, poštenih in pravičnih postopkov lahko uspešno in učinkovito razveljavila ali razglasila za nično, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi z določitvijo postopkov za razveljavitev in ugotovitev ničnosti.
In order to ensure a smooth, effective and efficient operation of the EU trade mark system, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the requirements as to the details on oral proceedings and the detailed arrangements for taking of evidence, the detailed arrangements for notification, the means of communication and the forms to be used by the parties to proceedings, the rules governing the calculation and duration of time limits, the procedures for the revocation of a decision or for cancellation of an entry in the Register, the detailed arrangements for the resumption of proceedings, and the details on representation before the Office.
Da bi lahko odbori za pritožbe na podlagi preglednega, temeljitega, poštenega in pravičnega postopka, v katerem se upoštevajo načela iz te Uredbe, uspešno, učinkovito in celovito pregledali odločbe Urada, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi z določitvijo formalne vsebine pritožbe, postopka za vložitev in preizkus pritožbe, formalno vsebino in obliko odločb odbora za pritožbe ter povračilo pristojbin za pritožbo.
In order to ensure an effective and efficient organisation of the Boards of Appeal, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the details on the organisation of the Boards of Appeal.
Da se zagotovi nemoteno, uspešno in učinkovito delovanje sistema blagovnih znamk EU, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi z določitvijo zahtev glede podrobnosti o ustnem postopku ter podrobne ureditve za pridobivanje dokazov, podrobne ureditve za uradno obveščanje, komunikacijskih sredstev in obrazcev, ki jih uporabljajo stranke v postopku, pravil, ki urejajo izračun in trajanje rokov, postopkov za razveljavitev odločbe ali izbris vpisa v registru, podrobne ureditve za nadaljevanje postopka ter podrobnosti o zastopanju pred Uradom.
In order to ensure the effective and efficient registration of international trade marks in a manner that is fully consistent with the rules of the Protocol relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks, adopted at Madrid on 27 June 1989 (‘Madrid Protocol’), the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the details on the procedures concerning the filing and examination of an opposition, including the necessary communications to be made to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), and the details of the procedure concerning international registrations based on a basic application or basic registration relating to a collective mark, certification mark or guarantee mark.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito in uspešno organizacijo odborov za pritožbe, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi z določitvijo podrobnosti o organizaciji odborov za pritožbe.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making [10].
Da bi zagotovili uspešno in učinkovito registracijo mednarodnih blagovnih znamk na način, ki je popolnoma skladen z določbami Protokola k Madridskemu sporazumu o mednarodnem registriranju znamk, sprejetega v Madridu 27. junija 1989 (Madridski protokol), bi bilo treba Komisijo pooblastiti, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi z določitvijo podrobnosti o postopkih za vložitev in preizkus ugovorov, vključno s potrebnim sporočanjem Svetovni organizaciji za intelektualno lastnino, ter podrobnosti o postopku za mednarodne registracije na podlagi osnovne prijave ali osnovne registracije kolektivne, certifikacijske ali garancijske znamke.