natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Vietnamese company General Shoes Ltd was supplier also to other importers than Timberland and its MET/IT request was not merely assessed in the context of the repayment request of Timberland.
Po razkritju so imeli na voljo obdobje za predložitev pripomb.
The MET/IT claim is assessed on the basis of the general conditions under which a company operates and is not limited to specific transactions or specific customers in the Union.
Ta uredba je v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 –
Therefore, the outcome of such assessment is applicable to the exporting producer concerned as such and there was therefore no manifest error with regard to Timberlands reimbursement requests.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
In the spirit of sound administration and in order not to delay unnecessarily the ongoing implementation exercise, this assessment will, however, be subject to separate legal act.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja ali umetnega usnja, razen športne obutve, obutve s posebno tehnologijo, copat in druge hišne obutve ter obutve z zaščitno kapico, s poreklom iz Vietnama, ki jo proizvajajo proizvajalci izvozniki iz Priloge II k tej uredbi in je uvrščena pod oznake KN: 64032000, ex64033000 [43], ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000 [44], ki je veljala v obdobju uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 1472/2006 in Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1294/2009.
This party argued that the conclusions of the current implementation cannot therefore constitute a basis for denying its reimbursement requests filed at the national customs.
„športna obutev“ pomeni obutev v smislu opombe 1 k tarifnim podštevilkam v poglavju 64 Priloge I Uredbe (ES) št. 1719/2005;
The importer further requested that the MET/IT claims of its suppliers should be investigated on the basis of the documents provided by the relevant Belgian customs authorities to the Commission.
„obutev s posebno tehnologijo“ pomeni obutev s ceno CIF za par v višini najmanj 7,5 EUR, ki je namenjena športnim aktivnostim, z eno- ali večplastno oblikovanim podplatom, nebrizganim, izdelanim iz sintetičnih materialov, posebej oblikovanim, da se odpravi učinek vertikalnih ali lateralnih gibov, ter s tehničnimi značilnostmi, kakor so hermetične podloge, ki vsebujejo plin ali tekočino, mehanske komponente, ki odpravljajo ali nevtralizirajo učinek udarca, ali materiali, kakor so polimeri z nizko gostoto, ter ki je uvrščena pod oznake KN: ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998;
With regard to the above claim, the Commission refers to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/223 [42] which sets out the procedure to be followed in this matter.
„obutev z zaščitno kapico“ pomeni obutev, ki vsebuje zaščitno kapico z odpornostjo na udarce najmanj 100 joulov [45] in je uvrščena pod oznake KN: ex64033000 [46], ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000;
In particular, in accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of that Regulation, the Commission will examine the relevant MET/IT claims as soon as it has received the relevant documentation from the customs authorities.
„copati in druga hišna obutev“ pomeni obutev, ki se uvršča pod oznako KN ex64051000.
D. CONCLUSIONS
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve pred plačilom dajatev, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije izdelkov iz odstavka 1, ki jih proizvajajo proizvajalci izvozniki iz Priloge II k tej uredbi, je 10 %.
Account taken of the comments made and the analysis thereof it was concluded that the residual anti-dumping duty applicable to Vietnam in respect of the fourteen exporting producers concerned for the period of application of the contested Regulation should be re-imposed.
Člen 2
E. DISCLOSURE
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 553/2006, se dokončno poberejo.
The exporting producers concerned and all parties that came forward were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the reimposition of the definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the fourteen exporting producers concerned.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo dokončno stopnjo protidampinških dajatev, se sprostijo.
They were granted a period within which to make representations subsequent to disclosure.
Člen 3
This Regulation is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Article 1
V Bruslju, 13. septembra 2016
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather, excluding sports footwear, footwear involving special technology, slippers and other indoor footwear and footwear with a protective toecap, originating in Vietnam and produced by the exporting producers listed in Annex II to this Regulation and falling within CN codes: 64032000, ex64033000 [43], ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000 [44] which took place during the period of application of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 1294/2009.
Za Komisijo
The TARIC codes are listed in the Annex 1 to this Regulation.
Predsednik
For the purpose of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
‘sports footwear’ shall mean footwear within the meaning of subheading note 1 to Chapter 64 of Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005;
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 553/2006 z dne 23. marca 2006 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Vietnama (UL L 98, 6.4.2006, str. 3).
‘footwear with a protective toecap’ shall mean footwear incorporating a protective toecap with an impact resistance of at least 100 joules [45] and falling within CN codes: ex64033000 [46], ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000;
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 388/2008 z dne 29. aprila 2008 o razširitvi dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 1472/2006 na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Posebne upravne regije Macao, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Posebne upravne regije Macao ali ne (UL L 117, 1.5.2008, str. 1).
‘slippers and other indoor footwear’ shall mean such footwear falling within CN code ex64051000.
UL C 251, 3.10.2008, str. 21.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable, before duty, to the net free-at-Union-frontier price of the products described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the exporting producers listed in Annex II to this Regulation shall be 10 %.
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1294/2009 z dne 22. decembra 2009 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Vietnama in s poreklom iz Ljudske Republike Kitajske, kakor je bila razširjena na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja, poslane iz Posebne upravne regije Macao, ne glede na to, ali je deklarirana kot izdelek s poreklom iz Posebne upravne regije Macao ali ne, na osnovi pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov na podlagi člena 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 (UL L 352, 30.12.2009, str. 1).
Article 2
UL C 295, 11.10.2013, str. 6.
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 553/2006 shall be definitively collected.
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2014/149/EU z dne 18. marca 2014 o zavrnitvi predloga izvedbene uredbe o ponovni uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki jo proizvajajo podjetja Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd in Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co.
The amounts secured in excess of the definitive rate of anti-dumping duties shall be released.
Ltd (UL L 82, 20.3.2014, str. 27).
Article 3
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti (UL L 302, 19.10.1992, str. 1).
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti (UL L 56, 6.3.1996, str. 1).
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Združene zadeve 97, 193, 99 in 215/86, Asteris AE in drugi in Helenska republika proti Komisiji, Recueil 1988, str. 2181, točki 27 in 28.
Done at Brussels, 13 September 2016.
Zadeva C-415/96, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1998, str.
For the Commission
I-6993, točka 31; zadeva C-458/98 P, Industrie des Poudres Sphériques proti Svetu, Recueil 2000, str.
The President
I-8147, točke od 80 do 85; zadeva T-301/01, Alitalia proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
2008, str.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 553/2006 of 23 March 2006 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam (OJ L 98, 6.4.2006, p. 3).
II-1753, točki 99 in 142; združeni zadevi T-267/08 in T-279/08, Région Nord-Pas de Calais proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 of 5 October 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with upper leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam (OJ L 275, 6.10.2006, p. 1).
2011, str.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and originating in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (OJ L 352, 30.12.2009, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) št. 765/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. junija 2012 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti (UL L 237, 3.9.2012, str. 1).
OJ C 295, 11.10.2013, p. 6.
V skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 765/2012 se spremembe, uvedene z uredbo o spremembi, uporabljajo samo za preiskave, ki so se začele po začetku veljavnosti navedene uredbe.
Council Implementing Decision 2014/149/EU of 18 March 2014 rejecting the proposal for an Implementing Regulation reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and produced by Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd and Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co.
Sedanja preiskava pa se je začela 7. julija 2005 (UL C 166, 7.7.2005, str. 14).
Ltd, OJ L 82, 20.3.2014, p. 27.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1395 z dne 18. avgusta 2016 o ponovni uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki jo proizvajajo družbe Buckinghan Shoe Mfg Co., Ltd., Buildyet Shoes Mfg., DongGuan Elegant Top Shoes Co.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1).
Ltd, Dongguan Stella Footwear Co Ltd, Dongguan Taiway Sports Goods Limited, Foshan City Nanhai Qun Rui Footwear Co., Jianle Footwear Industrial, Sihui Kingo Rubber Shoes Factory, Synfort Shoes Co.
As from 1 May 2016, Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (‘UCC’) replacing the CCC, entered into force; ( OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).
Ltd., Taicang Kotoni Shoes Co.
The substantial provisions at stake here have remained the same.
Ltd., Wei Hao Shoe Co.
Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1).
Ltd., Wei Hua Shoe Co.
Joined cases 97, 193, 99 and 215/86 Asteris AE and others and Hellenic Republic v Commission [1988] ECR 2181, paragraphs 27 and 28.
Ltd., Win Profile Industries Ltd, in izvajanju sodbe Sodišča v združenih zadevah C-659/13 in C-34/14 (UL L 225, 19.8.2016, str. 52).
Case C-415/96 Spain v Commission [1998] ECR I-6993, paragraph 31; Case C-458/98 P Industrie des Poudres Sphériques v Council [2000] I-8147, paragraphs 80 to 85; Case T-301/01 Alitalia v Commission [2008] II-1753, paragraphs 99 and 142; Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08 Région Nord-Pas de Calais v Commission [2011] II-1999, paragraph 83.
Zadeva C-458/98 P, Industrie des Poudres Sphériques proti Svetu, Recueil 2000, str. I-8147.
Case C-415/96 Spain v Commission [1998] ECR I-6993, paragraph 31; Case C-458/98 P Industrie des Poudres Sphériques v Council [2000] I-8147, paragraphs 80 to 85.
Obvestilo o izvajanju sodbe v združenih zadevah C-659/13 in C-34/14 C&J Clark International Limited in Puma SE glede Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1472/2006 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Vietnama (UL C 101, 17.3.2016, str. 13).
Regulation (EU) No 765/2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 237, 3.9.2012, p. 1).
Zadeva 270/84, Licata proti Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru, Recueil 1986, str. 2305, točka 31; zadeva C-60/98, Butterfly Music proti CEMED, Recueil 1999, str. I-3939, točka 24; zadeva 68/69 Bundesknappschaft proti Brock, Recueil 1970, str. 171, točka 6; zadeva 1/73, Westzucker GmbH proti Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Zucker, Recueil 1973, str. 723, točka 5; zadeva 143/73, SOPAD proti FORMA a.o., Recueil 1973, str. 1433, točka 8; zadeva 96/77, Bauche, Recueil 1978, str. 383, točka 48; zadeva 125/77, Koninklijke Scholten-Honig NV proti Hoofdproduktschap voor Akkerbouwprodukten, Recueil 1978, str. 1991, točka 37; zadeva 40/79, Ρ proti Komisiji, Recueil 1981, str. 361, točka 12; zadeva T-404/05, Grčija proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
According to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 765/2012 of the amendments introduced by that amending Regulation only apply to investigations initiated after the entry into force of that Regulation.
2008, str.
The present investigation, however, was initiated on 7 July 2005 (OJ C 166, 7.7.2005, p. 14).
II-272, točka 77; zadeva C-334/07 Ρ, Komisija proti Freistaat Sachsen, ZOdl.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395 of 18 August 2016 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and produced by Buckinghan Shoe Mfg Co., Ltd, Buildyet Shoes Mfg., DongGuan Elegant Top Shoes Co.
2008, str. I-9465, točka 53.
Ltd, Dongguan Stella Footwear Co Ltd, Dongguan Taiway Sports Goods Limited, Foshan City Nanhai Qun Rui Footwear Co., Jianle Footwear Industrial, Sihui Kingo Rubber Shoes Factory, Synfort Shoes Co.
Zadeva T-176/01, Ferrière Nord proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Ltd, Taicang Kotoni Shoes Co.
2004, str. II-3931, točka 139; zadeva C-334/07 Ρ, Komisija proti Freistaat Sachsen, ZOdl.
Ltd, Wei Hao Shoe Co.
2008, str. I-9465, točka 53.
Ltd, Wei Hua Shoe Co.
Zadeva C-169/95, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1997, str.
Ltd, Win Profile Industries Ltd, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 (OJ L 225, 19.8.2016, p. 52).
I-135, točke od 51 do 54; združeni zadevi T-116/01 in T-118/01, P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya) SA proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str.
Case C-458/98 P Industrie des Poudres Sphériques v Council [2000] I-8147
II-2957, točka 205.
Notice on the implementation of the judgment in joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 C&J Clark International Limited and Puma SE concerning Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam (OJ C 101, 17.3.2016, p. 13).
Zadeva C-34/92, GruSa Fleisch proti Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas, Recueil 1993, str. I-4147, točka 22.
Case 270/84 Licata v ESC [1986] ECR 2305, paragraph 31; Case C-60/98 Butterfly Music v CEDEM [1999] ECR 1-3939, paragraph 24; Case 68/69 Bundesknappschaft v Brock [1970] ECR 171, paragraph 6; Case 1/73 Westzucker GmbH v Einfuhr und Vorratsstelle für Zucker [1973] 723, paragraph 5; Case 143/73 SOPAD v FORMA a.o.
Zadeva C-337/88, Società agricola fattoria alimentare (SAFA), Recueil 1990, str.
ECR 1433, paragraph 8; Case 96/77 Bauche [1978] ECR 383, paragraph 48; Case 125/77 KoninklijkeScholten-Honig NV v Floofdproduktschaap voor Akkerbouwprodukten [1978] ECR 1991, paragraph 37; Case 40/79 Ρ v Commission [1981] ECR 361, paragraph 12; Case T-404/05 Greece v Commission [2008] ECR II-272, paragraph 77; C-334/07 Ρ Commission v Freistaat Sachsen [2008] ECR 1-9465, paragraph 53.
I-1, točka 13.
Case T-176/01 Ferrière Nord ν Commission [2004] ECR 11-3931, paragraph 139; C-334/07 Ρ Commission v Freistaat Sachsen [2008] ECR 1-9465, paragraph 53.
Zadeva 245/81, Edeka proti Nemčiji, Recueil 1982, str. 2746, točka 27.
Case C-169/95 Spain v Commission [1997] ECR I-135, paragraph 51 to 54; Joined Cases T-116/01 and T-118/01, P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya) SA v Commission [2003] ECR II-2957, paragraph 205.
UL C 166, 7.7.2005, str. 14.
Case C-34/92 GruSa Fleisch v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas [1993] ECR 1-4147, paragraph 22.
Zadeva T-299/05, Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise in Shanghai Adeptech Precision proti Svetu, ZOdl.
The same or similar wording can be found for example in Joined cases 212 to 217/80 Meridionale Industria Salumi α.δ.
2009, str.
ECR 2735, paragraph 9 and 10; Case 21/81 Bout [1982] ECR 381, paragraph 13; Case T-42/96 Eyckeler & Malt v Commission [1998] ECR 11-401, paragraphs 53 and 55 to 56; Case T-180/01 Euroagri v Commission [2004] ECR II-369, paragraph 36.
II-565, točke od 116 do 146.
Case C-337/88 Società agricola fattoria alimentare (SAFA) [1990] ECR I-1, paragraph 13.
Zadeva C-141/08 P, Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co.
Case 245/81 Edeka v Germany [1982] ECR 2746, paragraph 27.
Ltd proti Svetu, ZOdl.
OJ C 166, 7.7.2005, p. 14.
2009, str.
Case T-299/05 Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise and Shanghai Adeptech Precision v Council [2009] ECR II- 565, paragraph 116 to 146.
I-9147, točka 94 in naslednje.
Case C-141/08 P, Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co.
Zadeva T-320/13, Delsolar proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Ltd v. Council [2009] I-9147, paragraph 94 and following.
2014, točke od 40 do 67.
Case T-320/13 Delsolar v Commission [2014] II-0000, paragraphs 40 to 67.
UL L 56, 6.3.1996, str. 1.
OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.
UL L 343, 22.12.2009, str. 51.
OJ L 343 22.12.2009, p. 51,.
Uredba (EU) št. 1168/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2012 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti, UL L 344, 14.12.2012, str. 1.
Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 of 12 December 2012 of the European Parliament and the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 344, 14.12.2012, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1515/2001 z dne 23. julija 2001 o ukrepih, ki jih Skupnost lahko uvede na podlagi poročila, ki ga sprejme Organ STO za reševanje sporov v zvezi s protidampinškimi in protisubvencijskimi zadevami (UL L 201, 26.7.2001, str. 10), uvodna izjava 6 iz preambule.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1515/2001 of 23 July 2001 on the measures that may be taken by the Community following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters (OJ L 201, 26.7.2001, p. 10), recital 6 of the preamble.
UL L 82, 20.3.2014, str. 27.
OJ L 82, 20.3.2014, p. 27.
Uredba (EU) št. 37/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. januarja 2014 o spremembi določenih uredb o skupni trgovinski politiki v zvezi s postopki za sprejetje določenih ukrepov (UL L 18, 21.1.2014, str. 1).
Regulation (EU) No 37/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2014 amending certain regulations relating to the common commercial policy as regards the procedures for the adoption of certain measures (OJ L 18, 21.1.2014, p.
Zadeva C-138/09, Todaro, ZOdl.
1).
2010, str.
Case C-138/09 Todaro [2010] ECR I-4561.
I-4561.
Case T-167/94 Nölle v Council and Commission [1995] II-2589, paragraph 62 and 63.
Zadeva T-167/94, Nölle proti Svetu in Komisiji, Recueil 1995, str.
See for example Case T-221/05 Huvis v Council [2008] ECR II-124 and Case T-249/06 Interpipe Nikopolsky v Council [2009] ECR II-303.
II-2589, točki 62 in 63.
For the sake of completeness, the following explanations appear useful: In case T-107/08 ENRC v Council, the General Court found that there was no dumping, or, at the very least, that the dumping margin established would have been lower than that calculated in the contested regulation, and therefore annulled the contested Council Regulation in its entirety (Case T-107/08 ENRC v Council [2011] ECR II-8051, paragraphs 67 to 70).
Glej na primer zadevo T-221/05, Huvis proti Svetu, ZOdl.
When the Commission applied the method prescribed by the General Court, it turned out that there was neither dumping nor injury.
2008, str.
The Commission therefore refrained from formally resuming the investigation.
II-124, in zadevo T-249/06, Interpipe Nikopolsky proti Svetu, ZOdl.
The institutions had re-calculated the duty without using zeroing already at an earlier stage, following a ruling of the WTO appellate body, and found that no dumping had occurred, and therefore terminated the investigation without imposing measures (i.e. effectively setting the new duty at zero) (Council Regulation (EC) No 160/2002 of 28 January 2002 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2398/97 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Egypt, India and Pakistan, and terminating the proceeding with regard to imports originating in Pakistan, OJ L 26, 30.1.2002, p. 2.).
II-303.