natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
First, they argued that the components for channel gratings are produced according to different production processes and are only produced in limited number in the Union.
Po navedbah tega združenja v Uniji ni strokovnega znanja za proizvodnjo kanalskih rešetk.
Second, they argued that the frames and rails of channel gratings have different basic physical characteristics and are only a component of the linear drainage systems sold on the Union market.
Pritožniki in en drug proizvajalec Unije so navedli, da ne oporekajo izključitvi kanalskih rešetk.
One Chinese exporting producer made a similar request, arguing in addition to the above arguments that channel gratings are not interchangeable from manhole covers and are subject to a different industrial standard.
S preiskavo je bilo potrjeno, da se za kanalske rešetke uporablja drug standard kot za preostale zadevne izdelke, in sicer standard EN 1433.
The association of unrelated importers supported the product exclusion request regarding channel gratings and added to the above arguments that channel gratings have different end-uses and applications from the rest of the product concerned and are not in direct competition with products manufactured by the Union producers.
Poleg tega so se vse zainteresirane strani strinjale, da se kanalske rešetke izključijo iz obsega izdelka v tej preiskavi.
According to this association, the know-how to produce channel gratings cannot be found in the Union.
Zato je Komisija začasno izključila ta izdelek iz zadevnega izdelka in podobnega izdelka.
The complainants and one other Union producer stated that they do not object the exclusion of channel gratings.
En nepovezani uvoznik je trdil, da bi morali biti sestavni deli s čisto odprtino, večjo od 1000 mm, ki jih nepovezani uvoznik Gatic uvaža iz LRK („sestavni deli uvoznika Gatic“), izključeni iz obsega izdelka, ker jih ni mogoče obravnavati kot en izdelek in ker zaradi svoje velikosti ne spadajo v standard EN 124.
The investigation confirmed that channel gratings are subject to a separate norm, different from those applicable to the rest of the product concerned, namely the EN 1433 norm.
Svojo trditev je utemeljil zlasti s tremi argumenti.
In addition, all interested parties agreed on excluding channel gratings from the product scope in this investigation.
Prvič, trdil je, da se sestavni deli uvoznika Gatic proizvajajo v skladu z drugačnimi proizvodnimi postopki, saj se sestavljajo v Uniji, pri čemer se za izdelavo končnega izdelka uporabljajo materiali, pridobljeni iz Združenega kraljestva.
Therefore, the Commission provisionally excluded this product from the product concerned and the like product.
Drugič, trdil je, da imajo sestavni deli uvoznika Gatic drugačne osnovne fizikalne lastnosti, ker so v primerjavi z zadevnim izdelkom višje kakovosti in zahtevajo dodatno inženirsko delo, da bi bili neprepustni za plin in zrak.
One unrelated importer argued that components with a dimension exceeding 1000 mm clear opening, imported by the unrelated importer Gatic from the PRC (‘Gatic components’), should be excluded from the product scope as these components cannot be considered as constituting together a single product and, because of their size, do not fall under the EN 124 norm.
Tretjič, trdil je, da imajo sestavni deli uvoznika Gatic drugačne namene uporabe in končne uporabe, saj morajo biti zatesnjeni in so običajno sestavljeni v večjo strukturo.
In supporting its claim, it mainly relied on three arguments.
Poleg tega je združenje uvoznikov trdilo, da liti pokrovi in rešetke, ki se uporabljajo kot sestavni deli uvoznika Gatic, niso samostojen izdelek, ne konkurirajo neposredno drugim vrstam izdelka v okviru zadevnega izdelka in zahtevajo dodatno obdelavo v proizvodnem postopku.
First, it claimed that the Gatic components are produced according to different production processes, as the components are assembled in the Union using UK sourced materials to create the product.
Indijski proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da se sestavni deli uvoznika Gatic, ki so opisani kot vrsta izdelka, vendar niso omejeni z velikostjo čiste odprtine več kot 1000 mm, proizvajajo v skladu z edinstvenimi postopki, katerih rezultat je zatesnjen izdelek, ki ga je treba sestaviti, in da za večino proizvajalcev Unije tehnično strokovno znanje ni na voljo.
Second, it argued that Gatic components have different basic physical characteristics, because they are of a higher quality and require additional engineering as compared to the product concerned to make them gas and air tight.
Zadevne zainteresirane strani so na podlagi argumentov, opisanih v uvodnih izjavah 45–48, zahtevale izključitev sestavnih delov uvoznika Gatic iz obsega izdelka.
Third, it alleged that Gatic components have different functions and end uses, since they have to be sealed and are typically assembled in a larger structure.
Pritožniki se niso strinjali s to zahtevo.
Furthermore, the association of importers argued that cast tops and gratings used as Gatic components are not a standalone product, are not in direct competition with other product types under the product concerned and require additional processing in the production process.
Trdili so, da imajo sestavni deli uvoznika Gatic enake osnovne fizikalne lastnosti, namene uporabe in končne uporabe ter enake proizvodne postopke kot zadevni izdelek.
The Indian exporting producers argued that Gatic components, described as a type of product but not limited to a dimension exceeding 1000 mm clear opening, are produced according to unique processes, resulting in a sealed product which has to be assembled, and that the technical knowhow is not available for the majority of the Union producers.
Nekatere druge vrste izdelka v okviru zadevnega izdelka naj bi imele enake lastnosti, kar zadeva neprepustnost za plin in zrak, kot sestavni deli uvoznika Gatic.
On the basis of the arguments described in recitals 45-48, the interested parties concerned requested the exclusion of the Gatic components from the product scope.
Nadalje so trdili, da zadevni izdelek ni opredeljen s standardom in vključuje širši nabor vrst izdelka kot standard EN 124.
The complainants did not agree with this request.
Komisija je ugotovila, da obseg zadevnega izdelka vključuje izdelke iz litega železa in njihove dele.
They argued that the Gatic components have the same basic physical characteristics, the same functions and end uses, and the same production processes as the product concerned.
Trditev, da sestavni deli uvoznika Gatic niso en izdelek, zato ni relevantna.
Some other product types within the product concerned allegedly have the same features of gas and air tightness as the Gatic components.
Glede fizikalnih in tehničnih lastnosti izdelka so pomembni dejavniki namen uporabe, namestitev in lokacija, pri čemer so glavne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti odpornost proti prometni obremenitvi, ki jo določa tako imenovani razred obremenitve, stabilnost pokrova in rešetk v okviru ter varen in enostaven dostop.
They further argued that the product concerned is not defined by the norm and includes a broader range of product types than the EN 124 norm.
Izdelek je lahko iz sivega ali nodularnega železa, pokrov in/ali okvir vstopnega jaška pa je lahko polnjen z betonom ali drugimi materiali.
The Commission observed that the product scope of the product concerned includes cast iron articles and parts thereof.
Izdelek je lahko skladen z določenim standardom.
The argument that the Gatic components do not constitute one product together is therefore irrelevant.
Kar zadeva namene uporabe in končne uporabe izdelka, predstavljajo pokrov in okviri vmesnik med podzemno napeljavo in površino ceste ali pločnika.
Regarding the physical and technical characteristics of the product, they are determined by function, installation and location, and are mainly the traffic load resistance determined by the so-called loading class, the cover and grate stability within the frame and the safe and easy access.
Izdelek se proizvaja v livarnah, ki so enake ali podobne tistim, v katerih se izdelujejo druge vrste zadevnega izdelka.
The product can be grey or ductile cast iron and the cover and/or the frame of manhole can be filled with concrete or other materials.
Vse navedene lastnosti veljajo tudi za sestavne dele uvoznika Gatic ne glede na velikost čiste odprtine izdelka.
The product can comply with a specific norm.
Sestavnih delov uvoznika Gatic ni mogoče razlikovati od zadevnega izdelka pri nobeni od navedenih lastnosti.
As for the functions and end uses of the product, castings cover and frames provide an interface between buried networks and the road or pavement surface.
Zahteva po izključitvi sestavnih delov uvoznika Gatic iz zadevnega izdelka se zato zavrne.
The product is produced in foundries, which are the same as or similar to those making other types of the product concerned.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da bi bilo treba talne odvodne kanale, strešne odvodne kanale, čistilne odprtine in pokrove za čistilne odprtine ter registrirano blagovno znamko Watts Dead Level Systems, za katere se uporablja standard EN 1253, izključiti iz obsega zadevnega izdelka.
All of the above characteristics also apply to the Gatic components, regardless of the dimension of the product's clear opening.
V podporo svoji trditvi je navedla, da se za izdelke, ki jih je opisala zainteresirana stran, delno uporablja drug standard kot za zadevni izdelek.
The Gatic components cannot be distinguished from the product concerned in any of the above characteristics.
Pritožniki so pojasnili, da takih izdelkov, za katere se uporablja standard EN 1253, ne štejejo za izdelke, ki so del zadevnega izdelka, ker imajo drugačen namen uporabe ter se ne uporabljajo kot pokrovi in rešetke za vodovod in kanalizacijo.
The request to exclude the Gatic components from the product concerned is therefore rejected.
Poleg tega industrija Unije ne proizvaja teh izdelkov.
One interested party argued that floor drains, roof drains, cleanouts and covers for cleanouts, and the trademark registered Watts Dead Level Systems, subject to the EN 1253 norm, should be excluded from the scope of the product concerned.
Komisija je določila, da se izdelki, za katere se uporablja standard EN 1253, ne štejejo za izdelke, ki spadajo v obseg zadevnega izdelka.
In supporting its claim, it argued that the products described by the interested party fall under a different norm than the product concerned.
Združenje nepovezanih uvoznikov je trdilo, da bi bilo treba cestne kape izključiti iz obsega zadevnega izdelka.
The complainants clarified that they do not consider such products subject to EN 1253 as being part of the product concerned, because they have a different function and are not used as a municipal casting.
Svojo trditev je utemeljilo zlasti z naslednjimi argumenti.
Furthermore, the Union industry does not produce these products.
Cestne kape imajo drugačne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti kot običajni pokrovi vstopnih jaškov, saj so običajno veliko manjše in se zanje uporabljajo nacionalni standardi skladnosti, ne pa standard EN 124.
The Commission established that products falling under the EN 1253 norm are not considered to be part of the product scope of the product concerned.
Končne uporabe in rabe se pri cestnih kapah in pokrovih vstopnih jaškov precej razlikujejo, saj se uporabljajo kot zaščitna komora in pokrovi, ne pa kot dostopna točka za delavce.
The association of unrelated importers argued that surface boxes should be excluded from the scope of the product concerned.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 36, je Komisija ugotovila, da zadevni izdelek ne zajema samo izdelkov, ki zagotavljajo dostop do površinskih ali podpovršinskih sistemov, temveč tudi izdelke, ki pokrivajo površinske ali podpovršinske sisteme ali zagotavljajo pogled do njih.
In supporting its claim, it mainly relied on the following arguments.
Cestne kape so zato del izdelka, ki je predmet preiskave, zahteva po izključitvi cestnih kap iz zadevnega izdelka pa je bila zavrnjena.
Surface boxes have different physical and technical characteristics from traditional manhole covers, because they are typically much smaller and fall within national compliance norms and not within the scope of the EN 124 norm.
Komisija se je zato začasno odločila, da bo iz opredelitve izdelka izključila kanalske rešetke, za katere se uporablja standard EN 1433.
The end-uses and applications for surface boxes differ substantially from manhole covers, as they serve as a protective chamber and covers, not as an access point to workers.
Po drugi strani pa je v tej fazi sklenila, da izdelki, za katere se uporablja standard EN 1253, niso bili zajeti v pritožbi in zato niso predmet preiskave.
As set out in recital 36, the Commission observed that the product concerned does not only cover articles that give access to ground or sub-surface systems, but also articles that cover or provide view to ground or sub-surface systems.
Začasno je zavrnila tudi zahtevo po izključitvi cestnih kap in sestavnih delov uvoznika Gatic iz preiskave.
Surface boxes are therefore part of the product subject to the investigation and the request to exclude surface boxes from the product concerned was rejected.
DAMPING
The Commission therefore provisionally decided to exclude channel gratings, being subject to the EN 1433 norm from the product definition.
LRK
By contrast, it concluded at this stage that the products subject to the EN 1253 norm were not covered by the complaint and are thus not subject to the investigation.
Normalna vrednost
It also provisionally rejected the request to exclude surface boxes and Gatic components from the scope of the investigation.
Tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“)
DUMPING
Komisija v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe določi normalno vrednost v skladu s členom 2(1) do (6) osnovne uredbe za katerega koli proizvajalca izvoznika v LRK, ki izpolnjuje merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe in bi se zato zanj lahko odobrila TGO.
The PRC
Merila so le zaradi lažjega sklicevanja na kratko povzeta takole:
Normal value
poslovne odločitve se sprejemajo glede na tržne razmere in brez večjega vmešavanja države, pri čemer stroški odražajo tržne vrednosti;
Market economy treatment (‘MET’)
podjetja imajo jasno določeno zbirko osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se revidirajo neodvisno v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in se uporabljajo za vse namene;
Under Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation the Commission determines normal value in accordance with Article 2(1) to (6) of the basic Regulation for any exporting producer in the PRC which complies with the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and could therefore be granted MET.
odsotnost znatnih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva;
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out below:
pravno varnost in stabilnost zagotavljata stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij ter
business decisions are made in response to market conditions and without significant State interference, and costs reflect market values;
menjava valut se izvaja po tržnem tečaju.
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records, which are independently audited, in line with international accounting standards and applied for all purposes;
Komisija je pri ugotavljanju, ali so merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe izpolnjena, potrebne informacije zbrala tako, da je proizvajalce izvoznike pozvala, naj izpolnijo obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system;
Samo en vzorčeni proizvajalec izvoznik, tj. družba Botou Lisheng Casting Industry Co., Ltd („družba Lisheng“), je zahteval TGO in odgovoril v določenem roku.
legal certainty and stability is provided by bankruptcy and property laws; and
Komisija je preverila predložene informacije v prostorih zadevne družbe.
currency exchanges are carried out at the market rate.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da družba Lisheng ni izpolnjevala meril iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, zato je Komisija njen zahtevek za TGO zavrnila.
For the determination whether the criteria in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation are met, the Commission sought the necessary information by asking the exporting producers to fill in the MET claim form.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da ni izpolnjevala nobenega od petih meril za TGO, določenih v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Only one sampled exporting producer, Botou Lisheng Casting Industry Co., Ltd (‘Lisheng’) claimed MET and replied within the deadline.
Pri merilu 1 za vmešavanje države je bilo ugotovljeno, da je družba spremenila lastništvo, ne da bi to sporočila Komisiji, in da je bil eden od novih lastnikov povezan z državo in Komunistično partijo Kitajske.
The Commission verified the submitted information at the premises of the company concerned.
Pri merilu 2 v zvezi z računovodskimi izkazi je bilo ugotovljeno, da računovodski izkazi družbe niso dovolj popolni, da bi bili pravilno revidirani, in da se niso vodili v skladu s kitajskimi ali mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
Lisheng was found not to comply with the criteria in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and therefore the Commission denied its claim to MET.
Pri merilu 3 družba ni mogla dokazati, da ni bilo znatnega izkrivljanja, prenesenega iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva, v zvezi z dajanjem zemljišč v najem in njenimi osnovnimi sredstvi.
Lisheng was found to have failed all five of the MET criteria set out in Article (2)(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Pri merilu 4 družba ni mogla dokazati, da se je zanjo uporabljalo pravo lastninskih razmerij, saj ni mogla predložiti dokazov v zvezi s spremembo lastništva od ustanovitve družbe leta 2010.
Under criterion 1 for state interference, the company was found to have changed its ownership without disclosing this fact to the Commission and that one of the new owners had links to the State and the Communist Party of China.
Pri merilu 5 družba v svojih računovodskih izkazih ni mogla dokazati, da menja valute po tržnem tečaju.
Under criterion 2 regarding accounts, the company's accounts were not complete enough to have been audited correctly, and were not kept in line with Chinese or international accounting standards.
Komisija je ugotovitve razkrila zadevnemu proizvajalcu izvozniku, organom zadevne države in industriji Unije.
Under criterion 3 the company could not show that there was no significant distortion carried over from the non-market economy system regarding land rental and their fixed assets.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da predložijo pripombe k ugotovitvam in zahtevajo zaslišanje pred Komisijo in/ali pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih.
Under criterion 4 the company could not show that property law applied to this company as they were unable to provide evidence concerning the change of ownership since the company was founded in 2010.
Komisija je upoštevala predstavljena stališča.
Under criterion 5 the company was unable to show in their accounts that they were converting foreign currencies at the market rate.
Zainteresirane strani je obvestila o končnih rezultatih ocene za TGO.
The Commission disclosed the findings to the exporting producer concerned, to the authorities of the country concerned and to the Union industry.
Zainteresirane strani po razkritju ugotovitev v zvezi s TGO niso predložile pripomb.
Interested parties had an opportunity to comment on the findings and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Sklep o zavrnitvi zahtevka družbe Lisheng za TGO zato ostaja nespremenjen.
The Commission took account of the views presented.
Proizvajalci izvozniki, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena
The Commission informed the interested parties of the final MET determination.
Primerljiva država
Following the disclosure of MET findings, no comments were received from interested parties.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se je normalna vrednost določila na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim ni bila odobrena TGO.
The conclusion to deny the MET claim of Lisheng therefore remains unchanged.
Zato je bilo treba izbrati tretjo državo s tržnim gospodarstvom.
Exporting producers not granted MET
Komisija je poleg Indije, Združenih držav Amerike, Norveške, Turčije in Irana, ki so bili navedeni v obvestilu o začetku, poskušala najti proizvajalce zadevnega izdelka v Braziliji in Koreji.
Analogue country
Na podlagi prejetih informacij je zaprosila deset znanih proizvajalcev podobnega izdelka, naj predložijo informacije.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation normal value was determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country for the exporting producers not granted MET.
Vprašalnik, poslan proizvajalcem iz primerljive države, sta izpolnila dva proizvajalca v Združenih državah Amerike in en proizvajalec na Norveškem.
For this purpose, a market economy third country had to be selected.
Poleg tega je Komisija upoštevala informacije, ki so jih poslali trije vzorčeni indijski proizvajalci.
In addition to India, the United States of America, Norway, Turkey and Iran, which were mentioned in the Notice of Initiation, the Commission tried to identify producers of the product concerned in Brazil and Korea.
Položaj Indije se je najprej proučil v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe, ki določa, da „[k]adar je to primerno, se uporabi tretja država s tržnim gospodarstvom, ki je predmet iste preiskave“.
On the basis of the information received, the Commission asked ten known producers of the like product to provide information.
Komisija je zato v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da je začasno izbrala Indijo kot primerno primerljivo državo, in jih pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe.
Two producers in the United States of America and one producer in Norway replied to the analogue country producers' questionnaire.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija opozorila, da je samo eden od petih vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov dejansko predložil informacije o domačih cenah in stroških.
In addition, the Commission considered the information obtained from the three sampled Indian producers.
Ne glede na to je opozorila, da je bila v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost določena na podlagi podatkov iz primerljive države.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission had thus informed interested parties that it had provisionally chosen India as an appropriate analogue country and had invited interested parties to comment.
Trdil je, da izbira Indije ni primerna zaradi prima facie dokazov o dampingu, domnevne razlike v proizvodnih postopkih med proizvajalci v Indiji in LRK, domnevnih shem izvoznih subvencij in izkrivljanj trga, ki vplivajo na ceno železove rude.
The CCCME and the association of unrelated importers claimed that section 15 of the Protocol of Accession of the PRC to the WTO had lapsed after 11 December 2016.
Komisija je proučila trditev, da Indija ni primerna izbira zaradi prima facie dokazov o dampingu.
Therefore, the choice of an analogue country was no longer warranted and that the Commission should use the domestic prices and costs of the Chinese producers to establish the existence of dumping.
Opozorila je, da prima facie dokazi o dampingu ne nakazujejo normalne vrednosti, temveč morebitno razliko med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno v Indiji.
In this regard, the Commission noted that only one of the five sampled exporting producers has indeed provided information on the domestic prices and costs.
Poleg tega s preiskavo niso bile potrjene trditve o domnevnem dampingu zadevnega izdelka v Indiji.
In any event, the Commission recalled that pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, normal value was determined on the basis of data from an analogue country.
Komisija je proučila trditev, da Indija ni primerna izbira, ker so proizvajalci v LRK domnevno avtomatizirali svoje proizvodne linije in naj bi uporabljali tehnologije, ki so bolj podobne tistim, ki jih uporabljajo proizvajalci v ZDA in na Norveškem.