natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Considerations of public interest should also allow courts and other competent authorities dealing with matters of matrimonial property regime in the Member States to disregard, in exceptional circumstances, certain provisions of a foreign law where, in a given case, applying such provisions would be manifestly incompatible with the public policy (ordre public) of the Member State concerned.
Zaradi javnega interesa bi morala imeti sodišča in drugi pristojni organi, ki obravnavajo premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema v državah članicah, v izjemnih okoliščinah možnost neupoštevanja nekaterih določb tujega prava, kadar bi bila njihova uporaba v določenem primeru očitno nezdružljiva z javnim redom zadevne države članice.
However, the courts or other competent authorities should not be able to apply the public policy exception in order to set aside the law of another State or to refuse to recognise or, as the case may be, accept or enforce a decision, an authentic instrument or a court settlement from another Member State when doing so would be contrary to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘Charter’), and in particular Article 21 thereof on the principle of non-discrimination.
Vendar sodišča ali drugi pristojni organi ne bi smeli imeti možnosti uporabe izjeme javnega reda, da bi zavrnili pravo druge države članice ali da ne bi priznali oziroma sprejeli ali izvršili odločbe, javne listine ali sodne poravnave, izdane v drugi državi članici, kadar bi bilo to v nasprotju z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina), zlasti s členom 21 Listine o načelu nediskriminacije.
Since there are States in which two or more systems of law or sets of rules concerning matters governed by this Regulation coexist, there should be a provision governing the extent to which this Regulation applies in the different territorial units of those States.
Ker imajo nekatere države dva ali več pravnih sistemov ali sklopov pravil v zvezi z zadevami, ki jih ureja ta uredba, bi bilo treba določiti, v kolikšnem obsegu se določbe te uredbe uporabljajo v različnih ozemeljskih enotah teh držav.
In the light of its general objective, which is the mutual recognition of decisions given in the Member States in matters of matrimonial property regime, this Regulation should lay down rules relating to the recognition, enforceability and enforcement of decisions similar to those of other Union instruments in the area of judicial cooperation in civil matters.
Glede na splošni cilj te uredbe, ki je vzajemno priznavanje odločb, izdanih v državah članicah na področju premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti pravila o priznavanju, izvršljivosti in izvrševanju odločb, podobna tistim iz drugih instrumentov Unije s področja pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah.
In order to take into account the different systems for dealing with matters of matrimonial property regimes in the Member States, this Regulation should guarantee the acceptance and enforceability in all Member States of authentic instruments in matters of matrimonial property regime.
Da bi upoštevali različne sisteme za obravnavo premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema v državah članicah, bi bilo treba s to uredbo zagotoviti sprejemljivost in izvršljivost javnih listin, izdanih na področju premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema, v vseh državah članicah.
When determining the evidentiary effects of a given authentic instrument in another Member State or the most comparable effects, reference should be made to the nature and the scope of the evidentiary effects of the authentic instrument in the Member State of origin.
Pri določanju dokazne moči javne listine v drugi državi članici ali njenih najbolj primerljivih učinkov bi bilo treba upoštevati vrsto in obseg dokazne moči javne listine v državi članici izvora.
It should also cover the factual elements recorded in the authentic instrument by the authority concerned, such as the fact that the parties indicated appeared before that authority on the date indicated and that they made the declarations indicated.
Vključevati bi moral tudi dejstva, ki jih v javno listino zapiše zadevni organ, kot je dejstvo, da sta se navedeni stranki določenega dne zglasili pri tem organu in dali navedene izjave.
The term ‘the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in an authentic instrument’ should be interpreted as referring to the contents as to substance recorded in the authentic instrument.
Pojem „pravni posli ali pravna razmerja, zapisana v javni listini“ bi bilo treba razlagati kot sklicevanje na materialno vsebino javne listine.
A party wishing to challenge the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in an authentic instrument should do so before the courts having jurisdiction under this Regulation, which should decide on the challenge in accordance with the law applicable to the matrimonial property regime.
Stranka, ki želi izpodbijati pravne posle ali pravna razmerja, zapisana v javni listini, bi morala to storiti na sodiščih, pristojnih po tej uredbi, ki bi morala o tem odločati po pravu, ki se uporablja za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema.
If a question relating to the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in an authentic instrument is raised as an incidental question in proceedings before a court of a Member State, that court should have jurisdiction over that question.
Če je vprašanje, ki zadeva pravne posle ali pravna razmerja, zapisana v javni listini, obravnavano kot predhodno vprašanje v postopku na sodišču države članice, bi moralo biti za odločanje o tem vprašanju pristojno to sodišče.
Should an authority, in application of this Regulation, be presented with two incompatible authentic instruments, it should assess the question as to which authentic instrument, if any, should be given priority taking into account the circumstances of the particular case.
Organ, ki bi na podlagi uporabe te uredbe prejel neskladni javni listini, bi moral glede na okoliščine posamezne zadeve oceniti, katera od obeh, če sploh katera, naj ima prednost.
Where it is not clear from those circumstances which authentic instrument, if any, should be given priority, the question should be determined by the courts having jurisdiction under this Regulation or, where the question is raised as an incidental question in the course of proceedings, by the court seised of those proceedings.
Če iz teh okoliščin ni razvidno, katera od obeh javnih listin, če sploh katera, bi morala imeti prednost, bi morala o tem odločiti sodišča, ki so pristojna v skladu s to uredbo, ali – če se to vprašanje postavi kot predhodno vprašanje v postopku – sodišče, pred katerim teče ta postopek.
The recognition and enforcement of a decision on matrimonial property regime under this Regulation should not in any way imply the recognition of the marriage underlying the matrimonial property regime which gave rise to the decision.
Priznanje in izvršitev odločbe o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema na podlagi te uredbe nikakor ne bi smela pomeniti priznanja zakonske zveze, ki je osnova za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločba.
The relationship between this Regulation and the bilateral or multilateral conventions on matrimonial property regime to which the Member States are party should be specified.
Opredeliti bi bilo treba razmerje med to uredbo in dvostranskimi oziroma večstranskimi konvencijami o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema, katerih pogodbenice so države članice.
This Regulation should not preclude Member States which are parties to the Convention of 6 February 1931 between Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden containing international law provisions on marriage, adoption and guardianship, as revised in 2006; to the Convention of 19 November 1934 between Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden comprising private international law provisions on succession, wills and estate administration, as revised in June 2012; and to the Convention of 11 October 1977 between Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden on the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil matters, from continuing to apply certain provisions of these Conventions in so far as they provide for simplified and more expeditious procedures for the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regime.
Ta uredba državam članicam, ki so pogodbenice konvencije z dne 6. februarja 1931 med Dansko, Finsko, Islandijo, Norveško in Švedsko, ki vsebuje določbe mednarodnega zasebnega prava o zakonski zvezi, posvojitvi in skrbništvu, kot je bila revidirana leta 2006, konvencije z dne 19. novembra 1934 med Dansko, Finsko, Islandijo, Norveško in Švedsko, ki vsebuje določbe mednarodnega zasebnega prava o dedovanju, oporokah in upravljanju zapuščine, kot je bila revidirana junija 2012, ter konvencije z dne 11. oktobra 1977 med Dansko, Finsko, Islandijo, Norveško in Švedsko o priznavanju in izvrševanju sodb v civilnih zadevah, ne preprečuje, da uporabljajo te konvencije, če določajo enostavnejše in hitrejše postopke za priznanje in izvršitev odločb v zadevah v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema.
In order to facilitate the application of this Regulation, provision should be made for an obligation requiring Member States to communicate certain information regarding their legislation and procedures relating to matrimonial property regimes within the framework of the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters established by Council Decision 2001/470/EC [9].
Za lažjo uporabo te uredbe bi bilo treba določiti, da morajo države članice sporočiti nekatere podatke o svoji zakonodaji in postopkih v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema v okviru Evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, ustanovljene z Odločbo Sveta 2001/470/ES [9].
Equally, to facilitate the application of this Regulation and to allow for the use of modern communication technologies, standard forms should be prescribed for the attestations to be provided in connection with the application for a declaration of enforceability of a decision, authentic instrument or court settlement.
Prav tako bi bilo treba zaradi lažje uporabe te uredbe in zato, da bi omogočili uporabo modernih komunikacijskih tehnologij, predpisati standardne obrazce za dokazila, ki se predložijo ob vložitvi zahtevkov za razglasitev izvršljivosti odločbe, javne listine ali sodne poravnave.
In calculating the periods and time limits provided for in this Regulation, Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council [10] should apply.
Pri izračunu rokov in iztekov rokov, določenih v tej uredbi, bi bilo treba uporabljati Uredbo Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 [10].
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission with regard to the establishment and subsequent amendment of the attestations and forms pertaining to the declaration of enforceability of decisions, court settlements and authentic instruments.
Za zagotovitev enotnih pogojev izvajanja te uredbe bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila za pripravo in poznejše spreminjanje dokazil in obrazcev za razglasitev izvršljivosti odločb, sodnih poravnav in javnih listin.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11].
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11].
The advisory procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts establishing and subsequently amending the attestations and forms provided for in this Regulation.
Pri sprejemanju izvedbenih aktov za oblikovanje in poznejše spreminjanje dokazil in obrazcev, določenih v tej uredbi, bi bilo treba uporabljati svetovalni postopek.
The objectives of this Regulation, namely the free movement of persons in the Union, the opportunity for spouses to arrange their property relations in respect of themselves and others during their life as a couple and when liquidating their property, and greater predictability and legal certainty, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of this Regulation, be better achieved at Union level, where appropriate by means of enhanced cooperation between Member States.
Ciljev te uredbe, in sicer prostega gibanja oseb v Uniji, možnosti, da zakonca uredita premoženjska razmerja med seboj in s tretjimi osebami v času trajanja zakonske zveze in ob likvidaciji svojih premoženjskih razmerij, ter večje predvidljivosti in pravne varnosti, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega in učinkov te uredbe lažje dosežejo na ravni Unije, in sicer po potrebi z okrepljenim sodelovanjem držav članic.
In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union, the Union has therefore competence to act.
V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji je Unija pristojna za ukrepanje.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter, in particular Articles 7, 9, 17, 21 and 47 concerning, respectively, respect for private and family life, the right to marry and to found a family according to national laws, property rights, the principle of non-discrimination and the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana z Listino, zlasti s členi 7, 9, 17, 21 in 47 v zvezi s spoštovanjem zasebnega in družinskega življenja, pravico sklepanja zakonske zveze in pravico ustvarjanja družine v skladu z nacionalnimi zakoni, lastninsko pravico, načelom nediskriminacije in pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in nepristranskega sodišča.
This Regulation should be applied by the courts and other competent authorities of the Member States in compliance with those rights and principles.
Sodišča in drugi pristojni organi držav članic bi morali pri uporabi te uredbe upoštevati navedene pravice in načela –
This Regulation shall apply to matrimonial property regimes.
Ta uredba se uporablja za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema.
It shall not apply to revenue, customs or administrative matters.
Ne uporablja se v davčnih, carinskih ali upravnih zadevah.
the legal capacity of spouses;
pravna in poslovna sposobnost zakoncev;
the existence, validity or recognition of a marriage;
obstoj, veljavnost in priznanje zakonske zveze;
the succession to the estate of a deceased spouse;
dedovanje po pokojnem zakoncu;
social security;
socialna varnost;
the entitlement to transfer or adjustment between spouses, in the case of divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment, of rights to retirement or disability pension accrued during marriage and which have not generated pension income during the marriage;
upravičenost prenosa ali prilagoditev pravic do starostne ali invalidske pokojnine, ki so bile pridobljene v času zakonske zveze in na podlagi katerih v času zakonske zveze ni prišlo do izplačila pokojnine, med zakoncema v primeru razveze, prenehanja življenjske skupnosti ali razveljavitve zakonske zveze;
the nature of rights in rem relating to a property; and
narava stvarnih pravic na premoženju in
any recording in a register of rights in immoveable or moveable property, including the legal requirements for such recording, and the effects of recording or failing to record such rights in a register.
vpis pravic na nepremičnini ali premičnini v register, vključno s pravnimi zahtevami za takšen vpis, in učinki vpisa ali nevpisa takšnih pravic v register.
Competence in matters of matrimonial property regimes within the Member States
Pristojnost za obravnavanje premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema v državah članicah
This Regulation shall not affect the competence of the authorities of the Member States to deal with matters of matrimonial property regimes.
Ta uredba ne vpliva na pristojnost organov držav članic za obravnavanje premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema.
‘matrimonial property regime’ means a set of rules concerning the property relationships between the spouses and in their relations with third parties, as a result of marriage or its dissolution;
„premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema“ pomeni celoto pravil, ki veljajo za premoženjske odnose med zakoncema in v njunem razmerju do tretjih oseb zaradi sklenitve ali prenehanja zakonske zveze;
‘matrimonial property agreement’ means any agreement between spouses or future spouses by which they organise their matrimonial property regime;
„dogovor o ureditvi premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema“ pomeni vsak dogovor med zakoncema ali bodočima zakoncema, s katerim uredita svoja premoženjska razmerja;
‘authentic instrument’ means a document in a matter of a matrimonial property regime which has been formally drawn up or registered as an authentic instrument in a Member State and the authenticity of which:
„javna listina“ pomeni listino v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema, ki je bila uradno sestavljena ali vpisana kot javna listina v državi članici in katere verodostojnost:
relates to the signature and the content of the authentic instrument; and
se nanaša na podpis in vsebino javne listine;
has been established by a public authority or other authority empowered for that purpose by the Member State of origin;
je ugotovil javni organ ali drug organ, ki ga je za ta namen pooblastila država članica izvora;
‘decision’ means any decision in a matter of a matrimonial property regime given by a court of a Member State, whatever the decision may be called, including a decision on the determination of costs or expenses by an officer of the court;
„odločba“ pomeni vsako odločbo v zvezi z premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema, ki jo izda sodišče države članice, ne glede na to, kako je odločba poimenovana, vključno s sklepom sodnega uradnika o odmeri stroškov sodnega postopka;
‘court settlement’ means a settlement in a matter of matrimonial property regime which has been approved by a court, or concluded before a court in the course of proceedings;
„sodna poravnava“ pomeni poravnavo v zadevi v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema, ki jo je potrdilo sodišče ali je bila med postopkom sklenjena pred sodiščem;
‘Member State of origin’ means the Member State in which the decision has been given, the authentic instrument drawn up, or the court settlement approved or concluded;
„država članica izvora“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri je bila izdana odločba, sestavljena javna listina ali potrjena ali sklenjena sodna poravnava;
‘Member State of enforcement’ means the Member State in which recognition and/or enforcement of the decision, the authentic instrument, or the court settlement is requested.
„država članica izvršitve“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri se zahteva priznanje in/ali izvršitev odločbe, javne listine ali sodne poravnave.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the term ‘court’ means any judicial authority and all other authorities and legal professionals with competence in matters of matrimonial property regimes which exercise judicial functions or act by delegation of power by a judicial authority or under its control, provided that such other authorities and legal professionals offer guarantees with regard to impartiality and the right of all parties to be heard, and provided that their decisions under the law of the Member State in which they operate:
V tej uredbi izraz „sodišče“ pomeni vsak sodni organ ter vse druge organe in pravne strokovnjake, pristojne za obravnavanje premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema, ki izvajajo sodno funkcijo ali delujejo na podlagi pooblastil, ki jih nanje prenese sodni organ, ali pod njegovim nadzorom, če ti organi in pravni strokovnjaki zagotavljajo jamstva glede svoje nepristranskosti in pravice strank do zaslišanja in so odločbe, ki jih izdajo, po pravu države članice, v kateri poslujejo:
may be made the subject of an appeal to or review by a judicial authority; and
lahko predmet pritožbe, naslovljene na sodni organ, ali predmet ponovne preučitve s strani tega organa in
The Member States shall notify the Commission of the other authorities and legal professionals referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 64.
Države članice v skladu s členom 64 uradno obvestijo Komisijo o drugih organih in pravnih strokovnjakih iz prvega pododstavka.
Jurisdiction in the event of the death of one of the spouses
Pristojnost v primeru smrti enega od zakoncev
Where a court of a Member State is seised in matters of the succession of a spouse pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 650/2012, the courts of that State shall have jurisdiction to rule on matters of the matrimonial property regime arising in connection with that succession case.
Če sodišče države članice začne postopek v zadevi dedovanja po zakoncu na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 650/2012, so sodišča te države pristojna za odločanje o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema, povezanih s to dedno zadevo.
Jurisdiction in cases of divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment
Pristojnost v primeru razveze, prenehanja življenjske skupnosti ali razveljavitve zakonske zveze
Without prejudice to paragraph 2, where a court of a Member State is seised to rule on an application for divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, the courts of that State shall have jurisdiction to rule on matters of the matrimonial property regime arising in connection with that application.
Če sodišče države članice začne postopek, da bi odločilo o vlogi za razvezo, prenehanje življenjske skupnosti ali razveljavitev zakonske zveze na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 2201/2003, so brez poseganja v odstavek 2 sodišča te države pristojna za odločanje o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema, povezanih s to vlogo.
Jurisdiction in matters of matrimonial property regimes under paragraph 1 shall be subject to the spouses' agreement where the court that is seised to rule on the application for divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment:
Zakonca se morata dogovoriti o pristojnosti za odločanje o premoženjskih razmerjih iz odstavka 1, če je sodišče, ki je začelo postopek, da bi odločilo o vlogi za razvezo, prenehanje življenjske skupnosti ali razveljavitev zakonske zveze:
is the court of a Member State in which the applicant is habitually resident and the applicant had resided there for at least a year immediately before the application was made, in accordance with the fifth indent of Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003;
sodišče države članice, v kateri vlagatelj običajno prebiva in je tam prebival najmanj leto dni neposredno pred vložitvijo vloge v skladu s peto alineo člena 3(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 2201/2003;
is the court of a Member State of which the applicant is a national and the applicant is habitually resident there and had resided there for at least six months immediately before the application was made, in accordance with sixth indent of Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003;
sodišče države članice, katere državljan je vlagatelj, ki tam običajno prebiva ter je tam bival najmanj šest mesecev neposredno pred vložitvijo vloge v skladu s šesto alineo člena 3(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 2201/2003;
is seised pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 in cases of conversion of legal separation into divorce; or
začelo postopek za spremembo prenehanja življenjske skupnosti v razvezo na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 2201/2003 ali
is seised pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 in cases of residual jurisdiction.
začelo postopek v okviru subsidiarne pristojnosti na podlagi člena 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 2201/2003.