natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, benchmarks provided from that third country can be used by supervised entities in the Union where a positive decision on equivalence of the third- country regime has been taken by the Commission.
Zato referenčne vrednosti, ki se zagotavljajo iz te tretje države, lahko uporabljajo nadzorovani subjekti v Uniji, kadar je Komisija sprejela pozitivno odločitev o enakovrednosti sistema tretje države.
In such circumstances, competent authorities should enter into cooperation arrangements with supervisory authorities in third countries.
V takih okoliščinah bi morali pristojni organi skleniti dogovore o sodelovanju z nadzornimi organi v tretjih državah.
ESMA should coordinate the development of such cooperation arrangements and the exchange between competent authorities of information received from third countries.
ESMA bi moral usklajevati pripravo takšnih dogovorov o sodelovanju in izmenjavo informacij, ki so pridobljene od tretjih držav, med pristojnimi organi.
However, in order to avoid any adverse impact resulting from a possible abrupt cessation of the use in the Union of benchmarks provided from a third country, this Regulation also provides for certain other mechanisms (namely, recognition and endorsement) under which third-country benchmarks can be used by supervised entities located in the Union.
Da pa bi preprečili kakršne koli škodljive učinke, ki so posledica morebitnega prenehanja uporabe referenčnih vrednosti, ki se zagotavljajo iz tretje države, v Uniji, ta uredba določa tudi nekatere druge mehanizme (in sicer priznanje in odobritev), na podlagi katerih lahko nadzorovani subjekti s sedežem v Uniji uporabljajo referenčne vrednosti tretje države.
This Regulation introduces a process for the recognition of administrators located in a third country by the competent authority of the Member State of reference.
Ta uredba uvaja tudi proces za priznanje upravljavcev s sedežem v tretji državi s strani pristojnega organa referenčne države članice.
Recognition should be granted to administrators complying with the requirements of this Regulation.
Priznanje bi se moralo izdati upravljavcem, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve iz te uredbe.
Acknowledging the role of the IOSCO principles as a global standard for the provision of benchmarks, the competent authority of the Member State of reference should be able to grant recognition to administrators on the basis of them applying the IOSCO principles.
Na podlagi načel IOSCO kot globalnega standarda za zagotavljanje referenčnih vrednosti bi moral pristojni organ referenčne države članice imeti možnost, da izda priznanje upravljavcem, če uporabljajo načela IOSCO.
To do so, the competent authority should assess the application of the IOSCO principles by a specific administrator and determine whether such application is equivalent, for the administrator in question, to compliance with the various requirements established in this Regulation, taking into account the specificities of the regime of recognition as compared to the equivalence regime.
Pristojni organ bi moral v ta namen oceniti uporabo načel IOSCO s strani posameznega upravljavca in določiti, ali je v njegovem primeru ta uporaba enakovredna izpolnjevanju različnih zahtev iz te uredbe, pri čemer bi moral upoštevati posebnosti sistema priznanja v primerjavi s sistemom enakovrednosti.
This Regulation also introduces an endorsement regime allowing, under certain conditions, administrators or supervised entities located in the Union to endorse benchmarks provided from a third country in order for such benchmarks to be used in the Union.
Ta uredba tudi uvaja sistem odobritve, na podlagi katerega lahko nadzorovani subjekti s sedežem v Uniji pod nekaterimi pogoji odobrijo referenčne vrednosti, ki se zagotavljajo iz tretje države, za namene uporabe takih referenčnih vrednosti v Uniji.
To do so, the competent authority should take into account whether, in providing the benchmark to be endorsed, compliance with the IOSCO principles would be equivalent to compliance with this Regulation, taking into account the specificities of the regime of endorsement as compared to the equivalence regime.
Pristojni organ bi moral v ta namen upoštevati, ali bi bila pri zagotavljanju referenčne vrednosti, ki naj bi se odobrila, skladnost z načeli IOSCO enakovredna skladnosti s to uredbo, pri čemer bi moral upoštevati posebnosti sistema odobritve v primerjavi s sistemom enakovrednosti.
An administrator or a supervised entity that has endorsed a benchmark provided from a third country should be fully responsible for such endorsed benchmarks and for the fulfilment of the relevant conditions referred to in this Regulation.
Upravljavec ali nadzorovani subjekt, ki je odobril referenčno vrednost, zagotovljeno iz tretje države, bi moral biti za tako odobreno referenčno vrednost v celoti odgovoren in zagotoviti izpolnjevanje ustreznih pogojev iz te uredbe.
All benchmark administrators are able to exercise discretion, are potentially subject to conflicts of interest, and risk having inadequate governance and control systems in place.
Za vse upravljavce referenčnih vrednosti je mogoče, da uveljavljajo diskrecijsko pravico, da so potencialno lahko predmet navzkrižja interesov in da obstaja tveganje, da imajo lahko neustrezne sisteme upravljanja in kontrole.
As administrators control the benchmark determination process, requiring authorisation or registration and supervision of administrators is the most effective way of ensuring the integrity of benchmarks.
Ker upravljavci nadzorujejo proces določanja referenčnih vrednosti, sta zahteva po izdaji dovoljenja ali registraciji in nadzor upravljavcev najučinkovitejši način za zagotavljanje celovitosti referenčnih vrednosti.
Certain administrators should be authorised and supervised by the competent authority of the Member State where the administrator in question is located.
Določenim upravljavcem bi moral izdati dovoljenje in jih nadzirati pristojni organ države članice, v kateri ima zadevni upravljavec sedež.
Entities already subject to supervision and that provide financial benchmarks other than critical benchmarks should be registered and supervised by the competent authority for the purposes of this Regulation.
Subjekte, ki so že pod nadzorom in zagotavljajo finančne referenčne vrednosti, ki niso ključne referenčne vrednosti, bi moral za namene te uredbe registrirati in nadzirati pristojni organ.
Entities that provide only indices that qualify as non-significant benchmarks should also be registered by the relevant competent authority.
Subjekti, ki zagotavljajo le indekse, ki so nepomembne referenčne vrednosti, bi tudi morali biti registrirani s strani ustreznih pristojnih organov.
Authorisation and registration should be distinct processes with authorisation requiring a more extensive assessment of the administrator's application.
Izdaja dovoljenja in registracija bi morala biti ločena procesa, pri čemer naj bi izdaja dovoljenja vključevala obsežnejšo oceno vloge upravljavca.
Whether an administrator is authorised or registered should not affect the supervision of that administrator by the relevant competent authorities.
Nadzor ustreznega pristojnega organa nad upravljavcem ne bi smel biti odvisen od tega, ali je bilo upravljavcu izdano dovoljenje ali pa je bil registriran.
Additionally, a transitional regime should be introduced, according to which persons providing benchmarks which are not critical and are not widely used in one or more Member States could be registered, with a view to facilitating the initial phase of application of this Regulation.
Da bi olajšali začetno fazo uporabe te uredbe, bi bilo treba poleg tega uvesti prehodno ureditev, v kateri bi se lahko registrirale osebe, ki zagotavljajo referenčne vrednosti, ki niso ključne referenčne vrednosti in se obsežno ne uporabljajo v eni ali več držav članic.
ESMA should maintain at the Union level a register that contains information on authorised or registered administrators, on benchmarks and the administrators that provide those benchmarks by virtue of a positive decision under either the equivalence regime or the recognition regime, on Union administrators or supervised entities that have endorsed benchmarks from a third country, and on any such endorsed benchmarks and their administrators located in a third country.
ESMA bi morala na ravni Unije voditi register, ki vsebuje informacije o upravljavcih z dovoljenjem ali registriranih upravljavcih, o referenčnih vrednostih in upravljavcih, ki zagotavljajo te referenčne vrednosti na podlagi pozitivne odločitve bodisi na podlagi sistema enakovrednosti bodisi sistema priznavanja, o upravljavcih Unije ali nadzorovanih subjektih, ki imajo odobrene referenčne vrednosti iz tretje države, in o vseh takih odobrenih referenčnih vrednostih in njihovih upravljavcih s sedežem v tretji državi.
In some circumstances a person provides an index but could be unaware that the index in question is being used as a reference for a financial instrument, a financial contract or an investment fund.
V nekaterih okoliščinah lahko oseba zagotovi indeks, vendar se pri tem ne zaveda, da se zadevni indeks uporablja kot sklicevanje za finančni instrument, finančno pogodbo ali investicijski sklad.
That is particularly the case where the users and benchmark administrator are located in different Member States.
To zlasti velja, kadar imata uporabnik in upravljavec referenčne vrednosti sedeža v različnih državah članicah.
It is therefore necessary to increase the level of transparency concerning which specific benchmark is being used.
Zato je treba povečati raven preglednosti glede na to, katera specifična referenčna vrednost se uporablja.
Such transparency can be achieved by improving the content of the prospectuses or key information documents required by Union law and the content of the notifications required by Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11].
Tako preglednost je mogoče doseči z izboljšanjem vsebine prospektov ali dokumentov s ključnimi informacijami, ki jih zahteva pravo Unije, ter vsebine uradnih obvestil, ki jih zahteva Uredba (EU) št. 596/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11].
A set of effective tools and powers and resources for the competent authorities of Member States guarantees supervisory effectiveness.
Učinkovitost nadzora je zagotovljena na podlagi sklopa učinkovitih orodij ter pooblastil in virov pristojnih organov držav članic.
This Regulation should therefore, in particular, provide for a minimum set of supervisory and investigative powers which should be entrusted to competent authorities of Member States in accordance with national law.
V tej uredbi bi bilo zato treba zlasti določiti minimalen sklop nadzornih in preiskovalnih pooblastil, ki bi jih bilo treba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom podeliti pristojnim organom držav članic.
When exercising their powers under this Regulation, competent authorities and ESMA should act objectively and impartially and remain autonomous in their decision-making.
Pristojni organi in ESMA morajo pri izvajanju svojih pooblastil na podlagi te uredbe ravnati objektivno in nepristransko ter morajo svoje odločitve sprejemati avtonomno.
For the purpose of detecting infringements of this Regulation, it is necessary for competent authorities to be able to access, in accordance with national law, the premises of legal persons in order to seize documents.
Za namene odkrivanja kršitev te uredbe morajo imeti pristojni organi v skladu z nacionalnim pravom možnost dostopa do prostorov pravnih oseb, da lahko zasežejo dokumente.
Access to such premises is necessary when there is reasonable suspicion that documents and other data related to the subject-matter of an inspection or investigation exist and could be relevant to prove an infringement of this Regulation.
Dostop do teh prostorov je nujen, kadar obstaja utemeljen sum, da obstajajo dokumenti in drugi podatki, povezani s predmetom inšpekcijskega pregleda ali preiskave, ki bi bili lahko pomembni za dokazovanje kršitve te uredbe.
Additionally, access to such premises is necessary where the person to whom a demand for information has already been made fails to comply with it, or where there are reasonable grounds for believing that if a demand were to be made, it would not be complied with, or that the documents or information to which the information requirement relates would be removed, tampered with or destroyed.
Poleg tega je dostop do takih prostorov potreben, kadar oseba ni izpolnila že predložene zahteve po informacijah ali obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za sum, da zahteva po informacijah, če bi bila predložena, ne bi bila izpolnjena ali da bi bili zahtevani dokumenti ali informacije odstranjeni, spremenjeni ali uničeni.
If prior authorisation is needed from the judicial authority of the Member State concerned, in accordance with national law, access to premises should take place after having obtained that prior judicial authorisation.
Če je v skladu z nacionalnim pravom potrebno predhodno dovoljenje sodnega organa zadevne države članice, bi se moralo v prostore vstopati po pridobitvi predhodnega sodnega dovoljenja.
Existing recordings of telephone conversations and data traffic records from supervised entities can constitute crucial, and sometimes the only, evidence to detect and prove the existence of infringements of this Regulation, in particular the compliance with governance and control requirements.
Obstoječe evidence telefonskih pogovorov in podatkovnega prometa nadzorovanih subjektov lahko pomenijo nujen in včasih edini dokaz za odkrivanje in dokazovanje kršitev te uredbe, zlasti v zvezi z upoštevanjem zahtev glede upravljanja in kontrole.
Such records and recordings can help to verify the identity of the person responsible for the submission of input data, those responsible for its approval and whether organisational separation of employees is maintained.
Takšni zapisi in evidence lahko pripomorejo k preverjanju identitete osebe, odgovorne za predložitev vhodnih podatkov, in oseb, pristojnih za njeno odobritev, ter preverjanju, ali se zagotavlja organizacijsko ločevanje zaposlenih.
Therefore, competent authorities should be able to require existing recordings of telephone conversations, electronic communications and data traffic records held by supervised entities, in those cases where a reasonable suspicion exists that such recordings or records related to the subject-matter of the inspection or investigation could be relevant to prove an infringement of this Regulation.
Zato bi morali pristojni organi imeti možnost, da zahtevajo obstoječe evidence telefonskih pogovorov in elektronskih komunikacij ter evidence o podatkovnem prometu, ki jih hranijo nadzorovani subjekti, kadar obstaja utemeljen sum, da bi lahko bili takšne evidence ali zapisi, povezani z vsebino inšpekcijskega pregleda ali preiskave, pomembni za dokazovanje kršitve te uredbe.
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the protection of personal data, the right to freedom of expression and information, the freedom to conduct a business, the right to property, the right to consumer protection, the right to an effective remedy, the right of defence.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih priznavata Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti pravico do spoštovanja zasebnega in družinskega življenja, pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov, pravico do svobode izražanja in svobode obveščanja, svobodo gospodarske pobude, pravico do lastnine, pravico do varstva potrošnikov, pravico do učinkovitih pravnih sredstev in pravico do obrambe.
Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles.
Skladno s tem bi bilo treba to uredbo razlagati in uporabljati v skladu z navedenimi pravicami in načeli.
The rights of defence of the persons concerned should be fully respected.
V celoti bi bilo treba upoštevati pravico zadevnih oseb do obrambe.
In particular, persons subject to proceedings should be provided with access to the findings upon which the competent authorities has based the decision and should be given the right to be heard.
Zlasti bi morale imeti osebe, ki so v postopku, zagotovljen dostop do ugotovitev, na podlagi katerih so pristojni organi sprejeli odločitev, in pravico, da izrazijo svoje mnenje.
Transparency regarding benchmarks is necessary for reasons of financial market stability and investor protection.
Preglednost glede referenčnih vrednosti je potrebna zaradi stabilnosti finančnih trgov in varstva vlagateljev.
Any exchange or transmission of information by competent authorities should take place in accordance with the rules on the transfer of personal data laid down in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [12].
Vsaka izmenjava ali prenos informacij med pristojnimi organi bi morala biti v skladu s pravili o prenosu osebnih podatkov iz Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12].
Any exchange or transmission of information by ESMA should take place in accordance with the rules on the transfer of personal data laid down in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [13].
Vsaka izmenjava ali prenos informacij, ki jo opravi ESMA, bi morala biti skladna s pravili o prenosu osebnih podatkov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13].
Taking into consideration the principles set out in the Commission's Communication of 8 December 2010 on reinforcing sanctioning regimes in the financial services sector, and legal acts of the Union adopted as a follow-up to that Communication, Member States should, in order to ensure a common approach and deterrent effect, lay down rules on administrative sanctions and other administrative measures, including pecuniary sanctions, applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and should ensure that they are implemented.
Države članice bi morale ob upoštevanju načel iz sporočila Komisije z dne 8. decembra 2010 o okrepitvi sistemov sankcij v sektorju finančnih storitev in pravnih aktov Unije, sprejetih na podlagi izsledkov navedenega sporočila, z namenom, da se zagotovita enoten pristop in odvračilni učinek, določiti pravila glede upravnih sankcij in drugih upravnih ukrepov, vključno z denarnimi kaznimi, ki se uporabljajo za kršitve določb te uredbe, in zagotoviti njihovo izvajanje.
Those administrative sanctions and other administrative measures should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Te upravne sankcije in drugi upravni ukrepi bi morali biti učinkoviti, sorazmerni in odvračilni.
Administrative sanctions and other administrative measures applied in specific cases should be determined taking into account, where appropriate, factors such as the repayment of any identified financial benefit, the gravity and duration of the infringement, any aggravating or mitigating factors, the need for administrative pecuniary sanctions to have a deterrent effect and, where appropriate, include a reduction in return for cooperation with the competent authority.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti upravne sankcije in druge upravne ukrepe, uporabljene v posebnih primerih, in po potrebi upoštevati dejavnike, kot so povračilo morebitne ugotovljene finančne koristi, resnost kršitve in njeno trajanje, morebitne oteževalne ali blažilne dejavnike, potrebo po upravnih denarnih kaznih za odvračilni učinek in po potrebi vključiti zmanjšanje v zameno za sodelovanje s pristojnim organom.
In particular, the actual amount of administrative pecuniary sanctions to be imposed in a specific case should be able to reach the maximum level provided for in this Regulation, or the higher level provided for in national law, for very serious infringements, while administrative pecuniary sanctions significantly lower than the maximum level should be able to be applied to minor infringements or in case of settlement.
Zlasti bi moralo biti mogoče, da lahko dejanski znesek upravnih denarnih kazni, ki se uvedejo v posebnem primeru, v primeru zelo resnih kršitev doseže najvišjo raven, kakor jo določa ta uredba, ali višjo raven, kakor je določena v nacionalnem pravu, medtem ko bi moralo biti mogoče, da lahko bistveno nižje upravne denarne kazni od najvišje ravni uporabijo v primeru manjših kršitev ali v primeru poravnave.
The possibility of imposing a temporary ban on the exercise of management functions within benchmark administrators or contributors should be available to the competent authority.
Pristojni organ bi moral imeti na voljo možnost, da upravljavcem referenčnih vrednosti ali prispevajočim osebam zanje naloži začasno prepoved opravljanja upravljavskih funkcij.
This Regulation should not limit the ability of Member States to provide for higher levels of administrative sanctions and should be without prejudice to any provisions in the law of Member States relating to criminal sanctions.
Ta uredba ne bi smela omejevati možnosti držav članic, da določijo višje ravni upravnih sankcij, in ne bi smela posegati v določbe prava držav članic v zvezi s kazenskimi sankcijami.
Even though nothing prevents Member States from laying down rules for administrative and criminal sanctions for the same infringement, Member States should not be required to lay down rules for administrative sanctions for the infringements of this Regulation which are subject to national criminal law.
Čeprav državam članicam nič ne preprečuje, da ne bi za iste kršitve določile pravil o upravnih in kazenskih sankcijah, od njih ne bi smeli zahtevati, da pravila o upravnih sankcijah določijo tudi za tiste kršitve te uredbe, za katere velja nacionalno kazensko pravo.
In accordance with national law, Member States are not obliged to impose both administrative and criminal sanctions for the same offence, but they should be able to do so if their national law so permits.
V skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice niso dolžne za isto kaznivo dejanje naložiti upravne in kazenske sankcije, morale pa bi imeti možnost, da to storijo, če jim to dovoljuje nacionalno pravo.
However, the maintenance of criminal sanctions instead of administrative sanctions for infringements of this Regulation should not reduce or otherwise affect the ability of competent authorities to cooperate, access and exchange information in a timely way with competent authorities in other Member States for the purposes of this Regulation, including after any referral of the relevant infringements to the competent judicial authorities for criminal prosecution.
Vendar pa se z ohranitvijo kazenskih namesto upravnih sankcij za kršitve te uredbe ne bi smela zmanjšati ali kako drugače spremeniti možnost pristojnih organov, da za namene te uredbe sodelujejo s pristojnimi organi drugih držav članic, dostopajo do informacij in informacije s temi organi pravočasno izmenjujejo, tudi po prijavi zadevnih kršitev pristojnim pravosodnim organom za kazenski pregon.
It is necessary to reinforce provisions on exchange of information between competent authorities and to strengthen the duties of assistance and cooperation which they owe to each other.
Treba je okrepiti določbe o izmenjavi informacij med pristojnimi organi ter vzajemne dolžnosti pomoči in sodelovanja.
Due to increasing cross-border activity, competent authorities should provide each other with the relevant information for the exercise of their function, so as to ensure the effective enforcement of this Regulation, including in situations where an infringement or suspected infringement is of concern to authorities in two or more Member States.
Zaradi vse obsežnejše čezmejne dejavnosti bi si morali pristojni organi pri opravljanju svojih funkcij posredovati ustrezne informacije, da bi poskrbeli za učinkovito izvrševanje te uredbe, tudi v primerih, ko bi kršitve ali domnevne kršitve utegnile zadevati organe v dveh ali več državah članicah.