natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Any further imports between registration and provisional measures, which come on top of stocks that substantially exceed the normal level, would further delay the remedial effect.
To bo vedno analiza vsakega posameznega primera, njen rezultat pa bo odvisen od konkretnih okoliščin v vsakem posameznem primeru, v katerem je bila odrejena registracija uvoza za retroaktivno uvedbo dajatev.
The rise in imports is likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of duties
Pri navedeni analizi je med drugim treba upoštevati učinek uvoza, ki je vstopil v Unijo med registracijo in začasnimi ukrepi.
The second step is to determine whether this rise is likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of the definitive duty to be applied.
Kadar uvoza ni bilo ali je bil ta le neznaten, registracija zadostuje za preprečitev nadaljnje škode za industrijo Unije.
The use of the words ‘is likely to’ indicates that this is a forward-looking analysis.
Zato običajno ni utemeljitve za uporabo druge faze, tj. retroaktivne uvedbe dajatev.
This will always be a case-specific analysis whose outcome will depend on the concrete circumstances in each and every case in which registration of imports in view of imposing duties retroactively has been ordered.
Pri oceni, ali bo učinek uvoza, ki je vstopil v Unijo med registracijo in začasnimi ukrepi, verjetno resno ogrozil popravljalni učinek dajatev, bo Komisija analizirala zlasti naslednje dejavnike:
That analysis should, inter alia, take account of the effect of imports that have entered the Union between registration and provisional measures.
obseg navedenega uvoza;
Where no or only insignificant imports have taken place, the registration has sufficed to avoid further damage to the Union industry.
čas navedenega uvoza;
Hence, there is normally no justification for applying the second step, that is retroactive imposition.
cene navedenega uvoza;
When assessing whether the effect of imports that have entered the Union between registration and provisional measures is likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of duties, the Commission would, in particular, analyse the following factors:
vse druge ustrezne okoliščine.
volume of those imports
Komisija bo med drugim analizirala naslednje okoliščine:
timing of those imports
zaloge uvoženega izdelka pred registracijo;
prices of those imports
gibanje cen uvoženega izdelka od začetka zavedanja dampinga do začasnih ukrepov;
any other relevant circumstances: The Commission will analyse, inter alia, the following other circumstances:
spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja, ki razkrivajo poskuse zaobidenja registracije.
stocks of the imported product prior to registration
Kumulacija
price trend of the imported product since awareness until provisional measures
Pri preiskavah, v katere je vključena več kot ena zadevna država, bo kumulacija uvoza iz teh držav za namene analize, opisane v točkah 1.1 in 1.2 zgoraj, odvisna od tega, ali se je Komisija odločila te uvoze kumulirati v osnovni protidampinški preiskavi.
changes in pattern of trade indicating attempts at circumventing registration.
Uporaba za obravnavano zadevo
Cumulation
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 5, so informacije predložili pritožnik, vsi vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije ter 22 nepovezanih in povezanih uvoznikov in/ali uporabnikov.
Application to the case at hand
Komisija je za odločitev, ali je retroaktivno pobiranje dajatev upravičeno, ocenila merila iz člena 10(4) osnovne uredbe.
The registration concerns imports that were made between 12 December 2015 and the date of imposition of the provisional anti-dumping measures, namely 12 February 2016.
Predložene so bile pripombe v zvezi z registracijo uvoza in morebitno retroaktivno uporabo protidampinških ukrepov, ki so analizirane v nadaljevanju.
During this period, the imports from the countries concerned were approximately 165000 tonnes.
Damping, ki traja daljše obdobje, ali zavedanje dampinga ali škode s strani uvoznika
As mentioned in recital 5 above, information was provided by the complainant, all sampled Union producers and by 22 unrelated and related importers and/or users.
V skladu s členom 10(4)(c) osnovne uredbe je moralo biti mogoče „opaziti damping preko daljšega obdobja ali pa se je uvoznik zavedal ali pa bi se bil moral zavedati dampinga, kar zadeva obseg dampinga in domnevno ali ugotovljeno škodo“.
Their imports represented 46 % of all imports from the countries concerned during the period for which the data was collected, namely from April 2015 to January 2016.
Komisija v tej zadevi meni, da so se uvozniki zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati dampinga, kar zadeva obseg dampinga in domnevno ali ugotovljeno škodo, od datuma začetka preiskave iz razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodni izjavi 17 in v nadaljevanju.
In order to decide whether retroactive collection of the duties was warranted, the Commission evaluated the criteria set out in Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation.
Eden od uvoznikov je trdil, da dokazi prima facie o dampingu v pritožbi ne zadostujejo za dokaz, da so se uvozniki zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati dampinga, kar zadeva obseg dampinga in domnevno ali ugotovljeno škodo.
Comments were submitted with respect to the registration of imports as well as on the possible retroactive application of the anti-dumping measures, which are analysed below.
Ta stran je zlasti navedla, prvič, da pritožba sama po sebi ni prepričljiv dokaz, da se je damping dejansko izvajal.
History of dumping or awareness of the dumping or injury by the importer
Drugič, če bi bilo sprejeto, da dokazi v pritožbi zadostujejo za ugotovitev, da bi se uvozniki morali zavedati dampinga, bi bila retroaktivna uvedba dajatev mogoča v vsaki preiskavi.
Pursuant to Article 10(4)(c) of the basic Regulation, there needs to be ‘a history of dumping over an extended period, or the importer was aware of, or should have been aware of, the dumping as regards the extent of the dumping and the injury alleged or found’.
Nazadnje je trdila, da je trditev združenja Eurofer, da uvozniki glede na izjemno nizke cene kitajskega in ruskega uvoza niso mogli spregledati obstoja dampinga, zavajajoča, ker domnevno nizke cene same po sebi ne dokazujejo, da je bil uvoz dampinški.
In the present case, the Commission considers that the importers were aware, or should have been aware of, the dumping as regards the extent of the dumping and the injury alleged or found since the date of initiation of the investigation, for the reasons explained above at recital 17 and below.
Druga zainteresirana stran je navedla, da združenje Eurofer ni predložilo poročil v tisku ali drugih javno razpoložljivih informacij, dostopnih uvoznikom hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz jekla v Uniji, ki so se nanašali na kakršen koli damping kitajskih proizvajalcev določenih hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz jekla.
One importer claimed that the prima facie evidence of dumping in the complaint was not sufficient to demonstrate that importers were aware or should have been aware of the dumping as regards the extent of the dumping and the injury alleged or found.
Ta stran je poudarila, da so se predložena poročila v tisku nanašala na jeklo na splošno in ne posebej na hladno valjane ploščate izdelke iz jekla.
In particular, this party noted that firstly, the complaint does not constitute by itself conclusive evidence that dumping actually took place.
Poleg tega so bila indijska in ameriška poročila v tisku, ki jih je predložilo združenje Eurofer, nepomembna v zvezi z zavedanjem uvoznikov v Uniji.
Second, if it were to be accepted that the evidence in the complaint is sufficient to conclude that importers should have been aware of dumping, the retroactive imposition of duties would be possible in every single investigation.
Najprej je treba poudariti, da se zavedanje uvoznikov iz člena 10(4)(c) osnovne uredbe nanaša na obseg dampinga in domnevno ali ugotovljeno škodo (dodan poudarek).
Finally, it submitted that Eurofer's claim that the existence of dumping could not be ignored by importers given the extremely low prices of Chinese and Russian imports is misleading, as alleged low prices do not by themselves prove that imports were dumped.
Komisija meni, da so se uvozniki zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati obsega dampinga in domnevne škode na podlagi objektivnih dejavnikov, ne samo na podlagi nezaupne različice pritožbe, temveč tudi na podlagi obvestila o začetku tega postopka, ki sta bila na začetku na voljo in posredovana vsem zainteresiranim stranem, vključno z uvozniki, uporabniki in njihovimi reprezentativnimi združenji.
Another interested party noted that Eurofer did not provide press reports or other publicly available information accessible to Union importers of CRFS that referred to any dumping by Chinese producers of specific CRFS products.
Poleg tega so imele zainteresirane strani celovit dostop do nezaupne različice zahtevka združenja Eurofer za registracijo, ki je bila dejansko napovedana že v sami pritožbi.
This party stressed that the press articles provided were on steel in general and not specifically on CRFS.
Preiskava je bila uvedena, ker se je štelo, da dokazi prima facie v pritožbi zadostno dokazujejo, da je bil uvoz iz zadevnih držav na trgu Unije verjetno dampinški.
In addition, the Indian and American press reports provided by Eurofer were irrelevant with respect to the awareness of importers in the Union.
Ti dokazi prima facie so zajemali obdobje od oktobra 2013 do septembra 2014, tj. daljše časovno obdobje.
To start with, it is important to underline that the importers' awareness, in Article 10(4)(c) of the basic Regulation, relates to the extent of the dumping and the injury alleged or found (emphasis added).
Navesti je treba tudi, da je retroaktivni obračun protidampinških dajatev dovoljen samo za uvoz, ki ga je bilo treba registrirati, in samo, če so izpolnjena merila, kot so določena v členu 10(4) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission considers that importers were aware or should have been aware of the extent of dumping and the injury alleged on the basis of objective factors, not only by means of the non-confidential version of the complaint but also through the notice of initiation for this proceeding which were both available and communicated to all known interested parties including importers, users and their representative associations at initiation.
Zato je nepravilno trditi, da je retroaktivna uvedba dajatev mogoča „v vsaki preiskavi“.
The investigation was initiated because it was deemed that the prima facie evidence in the complaint sufficiently demonstrated that the imports from the countries concerned were likely being dumped on the Union market.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba poročila v tisku upoštevati glede na druga objektivna dejstva, kot so predstavljena v zgornjih uvodnih izjavah.
This prima facie evidence covered the period October 2013 to September 2014, i.e. an extended period of time.
Trditve v zvezi z vprašanjem zavedanja uvoznikov se zato zavrnejo.
In addition, it was provisionally found and also definitively confirmed that dumping was also established for the investigation period of the proceeding, namely April 2014 to March 2015.
Nekateri uvozniki so v svojem odgovoru na razkritje trdili, da bi bilo treba vprašanje zavedanja dampinga in škode proučiti z vidika retroaktivnosti, ki je „izreden ukrep“, ter da to določa visoke standarde za preiskovalni organ in/ali da je predlagani pristop k „zavedanju uvoznikov“ v zvezi s členom 10(4)(c) osnovne uredbe preširok.
Therefore, it is confirmed that importers were or should have been aware of the dumping and the injury alleged as of the date of publication of the notice of initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Zato ugotavljajo, da obvestilo o začetku ne zadošča, da bi se uvozniki zavedali obstoja dampinga in škode ali njunega obsega.
It must also be noted that the retroactive levying of anti-dumping duties is only permitted on imports that were subject to registration and only when the criteria, as set out in Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation, are met.
Vendar sta obvestilo o začetku, o katerem se je veliko poročalo v časopisju s področja trgovine z jeklom, in javna različica pritožbe, ki je bila poslana znanim uvoznikom in/ali uporabnikom ter od prvega dne preiskave na voljo vsem zainteresiranim stranem, skupaj (zelo podrobno) jasno navajala uporabljeno metodologijo, vir informacij ter določene visoke stopnje dampinga in škode za LRK in Rusijo.
Therefore, it is incorrect to claim that the retroactive imposition of duties is possible ‘in every single investigation’.
Tako je bil obseg dampinga sporočen kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF.
Regarding the alleged irrelevance of the press reports provided by Eurofer, the Commission acknowledges that these were not articles on CRFS specifically, but they have given a reliable indication of the pricing behaviour of exporting steel producers in the countries concerned.
Poleg tega je Komisija v uvodnih izjavah 5 do 11 uredbe o registracij opozorila vse zainteresirane strani, da ima dovolj dokazov o dampingu, kar zadeva njegov obseg in domnevno ali ugotovljeno škodo.
Furthermore, the press reports should be seen in the light of the other objective facts as set out in the above recitals.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da so se uvozniki zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati obstoja ali domnevnega obstoja dampinga in škode.
Therefore, the arguments regarding the issue of the awareness of importers are rejected.
Dejstvo, da na podlagi vseh preiskav niso bili uvedeni protidampinški ukrepi, ne pomeni, da dokazi prima facie o dampingu in škodi niso bili na voljo uvoznikom.
In their response to the disclosure certain importers claimed that the awareness of dumping and injury issue should be seen in the light of retroactivity being ‘an exceptional measure’ and that this sets high standards on the investigating authority and/or that the approach proposed on ‘awareness of importers’ in respect of Article 10(4)(c) of the basic Regulation is excessively broad.
Komisija je zato prepričana, da so bili izpolnjeni zahtevani standardi, ki zadevajo to vprašanje.
They therefore conclude that the notice of initiation is not sufficient to make importers aware of the existence of dumping and injury or its extent.
Ruski proizvajalci izvozniki in uvoznik so trdili, da odločitev Komisija iz člena 10(4)(c) osnovne uredbe zagotovo ne izpolnjuje standarda iz člena 10(6)(i) protidampinškega sporazuma, v katerem je navedeno, da bi se moral uvoznik zavedati, da izvoznik izvaja damping in da tak damping povzroča škodo.
However, the notice of initiation, which was widely reported in the steel trade press, and the open version of the complaint, which was sent to known importers and/or users and available to all interested parties from day one of the investigation, when taken together clearly stated (in substantial detail) the methodology applied, the source of information used and specified high levels of dumping and injury for both the PRC and Russia.
Poleg tega so trdili, da je v skladu z razlago Komisije pogoj glede „zavedanja“ izpolnjen vsakič, ko se objavi obvestilo o začetku, kar je nesprejemljivo.
The extent of dumping was thereby communicated in the form of a percentage of the CIF import price.
Nadalje so trdili, da je ocena dampinga zapleten postopek, ki zahteva dostop do poslovnih skrivnosti, ki jih ni dovoljeno razkriti.
Further, the Commission in recitals 5 to 11 of the registration Regulation reminded all interested parties that it had sufficient evidence on the dumping as regards the extent of the dumping and the injury alleged or found.
Najprej je treba poudariti, da ima vsaka članica STO pravico vzpostaviti svoje protidampinške postopke in prakse, ki ustrezajo njenim okoliščinam, če ti ne kršijo standardov STO.
The Commission therefore concludes that importers were aware, or should have been aware, that dumping and injury was taking place or alleged.
Komisija meni, da ima zelo visoke standarde za začetek preiskav ter da je bila, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 43, na podlagi razpoložljivih dokazov izvedena in zainteresiranim stranem dana na voljo zelo podrobna preiskava dampinga in škode.
The fact that not all investigations result in anti-dumping measures does not mean that prima facie evidence of dumping and injury has not been made available to importers.
Ti podatki vključujejo domače in izvozne cene posameznih družb, ki bi jih lahko uvozniki zlahka primerjali s cenami, po katerih so kupovali iz zadevnih držav, da bi ugotovili, ali so bile take cene dampinške in v kakšnem obsegu.
The Commission is therefore satisfied that the necessary standards relevant to this issue have been met.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 5, da so bili prejeti nekateri odgovori povezanih uvoznikov, ki imajo dostop do ustreznih informacij v zvezi z domačimi in izvoznimi cenami.
The Russian exporting producers and an importer claimed that the Commission's determination under Article 10(4)(c) of the basic Regulation certainly did not meet the standard set out in Article 10(6)(i) of the ADA which states the importer should have been aware that the exporter practices dumping and that such dumping causes injury.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti, da pravo STO ne določa, da bi morali biti uvozniki sposobni natančno izračunati damping, temveč da bi se morali zavedati obsega takega dampinga.
In addition, it was claimed that using the Commission's interpretation, the ‘awareness’ condition is met on every occasion when a notice of initiation is published, which is unacceptable.
Poleg tega je bila dana na voljo tudi analiza različnih kazalnikov škode, skupaj z natančnimi izračuni nelojalnega nižanja cen in prodaje po prenizkih cenah, v kateri je bilo navedeno, da bo tak dampinški uvoz povzročil škodo.
It was further claimed that the assessment of dumping is a complex process which entails having access to business secrets that cannot be disclosed.
En uvoznik je tudi trdil, da so mu njegovi dobavitelji zagotovili, da niso izvajali dampinga, vendar tega niso utemeljili.
First of all, it should be pointed out that each WTO Member has the right to establish its anti-dumping procedures and practices to suit its own circumstances as long as they do not breach WTO standards.
Zato je treba to trditev zavrniti.
The Commission considers that it has very high standards for opening investigations and as mentioned at recital 43 above a very detailed examination of dumping and injury based on the evidence available was carried out and made available to interested parties.
Zato je treba to trditev zavrniti.
This data includes company specific domestic and export prices which importers could have easily compared with the prices at which they were buying from the countries concerned in order to establish if such prices were dumped and to what extent.
Komisija zato v zadevnem primeru potrjuje, da so imeli uvozniki očitno dokaze, da so kitajski in ruski izvozniki izvajali škodljivi damping.
It is also noted that as indicated in recital 5, some of the replies were received from related importers that had access to the relevant information with regard to domestic and export prices.
Nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza bo verjetno ogrozila popravljalni učinek dokončne protidampinške dajatve
Further, the analysis of the various injury indicators together with detailed undercutting and underselling calculations were also made available and indicated such dumped imports would cause injury.
Nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza
One importer also claimed that its suppliers had assured him that they did not engage in dumping practices without, however, substantiating it.
Glede na Eurostatove podatke [8] (ki so bili v času ocene na voljo do vključno marca 2016) je povprečni mesečni obseg uvoza iz zadevnih držav v obdobju preiskave znašal 118912 ton.
Therefore, this claim has to be rejected.
Povprečni mesečni obseg uvoza iz zadevnih držav v obdobju, ki se je začelo v prvem polnem mesecu po objavi začetka preiskave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in končalo v zadnjem polnem mesecu pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov (junij 2015–januar 2016), je znašal 162457 ton, kar je za 37 % več kot v obdobju preiskave.
The Russian exporting producers contested the finding of dumping and indicated that importers became only aware of the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and the extent of the dumping on 12 February 2016.
V istem obdobju je skupni obseg uvoza znašal 1299658 ton, in sicer 721386 ton iz LRK in 578272 ton iz Rusije.
In this regard it is noted that the above mentioned information on file, namely the notice of initiation and the non-confidential version of the complaint that was sent to or made available to importers gave a clear indication of the extent of dumping and that the imposition of provisional measures only confirmed such information.
Če se povprečni mesečni obseg uvoza iz LRK in Rusije primerja ločeno, se ugotovi 48-odstotno in 25-odstotno povečanje povprečnega mesečnega obsega uvoza iz LRK oziroma Rusije.
This claim has therefore to be rejected.
V obdobju od prvega polnega meseca po začetku preiskave do vključno meseca, v katerem so bili uvedeni začasni ukrepi (tj. od junija 2015 do februarja 2016), povprečni mesečni obseg uvoza znaša 150673 ton, kar je za 27 % več od mesečnega povprečja v obdobju preiskave.
The Commission therefore confirms, in this particular case, that the importers clearly had evidence that the Chinese and Russian exporters were practising injurious dumping.
Kar zadeva mesečni obseg uvoza iz LRK in Rusije, je ugotovljeno 34-odstotno oziroma 19-odstotno povečanje.
A further substantial rise in imports likely to undermine the remedial effect of the definitive anti-dumping duty
Uvoz 22 uvoznikov in/ali uporabnikov, ki so predložili informacije o uvozu v obdobju po začetku preiskave (od junija 2015 do januarja 2016), je predstavljal 46 % celotnega uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
Pursuant to Article 10(4)(d) of the basic Regulation, there needs to be ‘a further substantial rise in imports in addition to the level of imports which caused injury during the investigation period’.
Obe analizi kažeta, da se je obseg uvoza po začetku preiskave dejansko znatno povečal.
A further substantial rise in imports
Več ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je izpodbijalo ugotovitev, da je bilo povečanje znatno, pri čemer so se sklicevali na „vodilne komentatorje in strokovnjake“, ki menijo, da mora biti povečanje uvoza resnično izjemno.
According to Eurostat data [8] (which at the time of the assessment were available up to and including March 2016), the average monthly import volume from the countries concerned during the investigation period was 118912 tonnes.
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej opozoriti, da navedena literatura ne pomeni trdega prava in da ne zagotavlja nobenih posebnih smernic glede tega, kaj bi bilo treba šteti za izjemno ali znatno, kar je treba v vsakem primeru analizirati za vsak primer posebej.
The average monthly import volume from the countries concerned in the period starting in the first full month after publication of the initiation of the investigation in the Official Journal of the European Union and ending in the last full month preceding the imposition of provisional measures (June 2015-January 2016) was 162457 tonnes, i.e. 37 % higher than in the investigation period.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija prepričana, da se povečanje uvoza lahko šteje za znatno, zato se ta trditev zavrne.
When comparing the average monthly import volume from the PRC and Russia separately, an increase of 48 % and 25 % in the average monthly import volumes is found for the PRC and Russia respectively.
Ruski proizvajalci izvozniki so to vprašanje ponovno obravnavali v svojih pripombah glede razkritja, pri čemer so navedli, da čeprav za zadevni izdelek niso bile uvedene nobene „sankcije“, je to zaradi splošne nepripravljenosti strank v Uniji, da bi kupovale blago iz Rusije, posredno vplivalo na zadevni izdelek.
Taking the period as from the first full month following initiation and including the month in which provisional measures were imposed (i.e. June 2015-February 2016) renders a monthly average import volume of 150673 tonnes, which is 27 % higher than the monthly average in the investigation period.
Ta trditev ni bila utemeljena.