natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation (EU) No 38/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Komisija pripravi poročilo o prenosu pooblastila najpozneje devet mesecev pred koncem petletnega obdobja.
(OJ L 18, 21.1.2014, p. 52)
Stalni logotip, kot je določen v Prilogi V, se pritrdi na vsako embalažo ali proizvod in vsak dokument, ki se uporablja v zvezi s potrjenim proizvodom, ki se namembnim državam prodaja po vzporedno določenih cenah.
Only point 3 of the Annex
Ta zahteva velja toliko časa, dokler je zadevni proizvod z vzporedno oblikovano ceno naveden v Prilogi I.
ANNEX VII
Kadar Komisija ugotovi, da produkt izpolnjuje zahteve iz te uredbe, se na Komisijo prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 5, da zadevni produkt ob naslednji posodobitvi doda v Prilogo I. Komisija obvesti prosilca o svojem sklepu v 15 dneh po njegovem sprejetju.
Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2016/794 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA
o Agenciji Evropske unije za sodelovanje na področju preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj (Europol) ter nadomestitvi in razveljavitvi sklepov Sveta 2009/371/PNZ, 2009/934/PNZ, 2009/935/PNZ, 2009/936/PNZ in 2009/968/PNZ
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 88 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 88 Pogodbe,
Europol was set up by Council Decision 2009/371/JHA [2] as an entity of the Union funded from the general budget of the Union to support and strengthen action by competent authorities of the Member States and their mutual cooperation in preventing and combating organised crime, terrorism and other forms of serious crime affecting two or more Member States.
Europol je bil ustanovljen s Sklepom Sveta 2009/371/PNZ [2] kot subjekt Unije, ki se financira iz splošnega proračuna Unije, da bi podpiral in krepil dejavnosti pristojnih organov držav članic ter njihovo medsebojno sodelovanje pri preprečevanju organiziranega kriminala, terorizma in drugih oblik hudih kaznivih dejanj, ki prizadenejo dve ali več držav članic, ter boj proti njim.
Decision 2009/371/JHA replaced the Convention based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) [3].
Sklep 2009/371/PNZ je nadomestil Konvencijo o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija o Europolu) [3], ki je temeljila na členu K.3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Article 88 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides for Europol to be governed by a regulation to be adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure.
Člen 88 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) določa, da Europol ureja uredba, sprejeta v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom.
It also requires the establishment of procedures for the scrutiny of Europol's activities by the European Parliament, together with national parliaments, subject to point (c) of Article 12 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 9 of Protocol No 1 on the role of National Parliaments in the European Union, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU (‘Protocol No 1’), in order to enhance the democratic legitimacy and accountability of Europol to the Union's citizens.
Zahteva tudi, da se določijo postopki za nadzor dejavnosti Europola, ki ga opravlja Evropski parlament skupaj z nacionalnimi parlamenti v skladu s točko (c) člena 12 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in členom 9 Protokola št. 1 o vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov v Evropski uniji, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol št. 1), da bi okrepili demokratično legitimnost in odgovornost Europola do državljanov Unije.
Therefore, Decision 2009/371/JHA should be replaced by a regulation laying down, inter alia, rules on parliamentary scrutiny.
Zato bi bilo treba Sklep 2009/371/PNZ nadomestiti z uredbo, ki med drugim določa pravila o parlamentarnem nadzoru.
The ‘Stockholm programme — An open and secure Europe serving and protecting citizens’ [4] calls for Europol to evolve and become a hub for information exchange between the law enforcement authorities of the Member States, a service provider and a platform for law enforcement services.
„Stockholmski program – odprta in varna Evropa, ki služi državljanom in jih varuje“ [4] poziva k razvoju Europola in k temu, da postane „središčna točka za izmenjavo informacij med organi pregona držav članic, ponudnik storitev in platforma za dejavnosti kazenskega pregona“.
On the basis of an assessment of Europol's functioning, further enhancement of its operational effectiveness is needed to meet that objective.
Na podlagi ocene delovanja Europola je treba dodatno izboljšati njegovo operativno učinkovitost, da se izpolni ta cilj.
Large-scale criminal and terrorist networks pose a significant threat to the internal security of the Union and to the safety and livelihood of its citizens.
Obsežne kriminalne in teroristične mreže so velika nevarnost za notranjo varnost Unije ter varnost in način življenja njenih državljanov.
Available threat assessments show that criminal groups are becoming increasingly poly-criminal and cross-border in their activities.
Ocene ogroženosti, ki so na voljo, kažejo, da se kriminalne združbe ukvarjajo z vedno več nedovoljenimi dejavnostmi in delujejo čezmejno.
National law enforcement authorities therefore need to cooperate more closely with their counterparts in other Member States.
Nacionalni organi preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj morajo zato tesneje sodelovati s sorodnimi organi v drugih državah članicah.
In this context, it is necessary to equip Europol to better support Member States in Union-wide crime prevention, analyses and investigations.
V zvezi s tem je treba Europolu zagotoviti zmogljivosti za boljšo podporo državam članicam pri preprečevanju, analiziranju in preiskovanju kaznivih dejanj po vsej Uniji.
This was also confirmed in the evaluation of Decision 2009/371/JHA.
To je potrdila tudi ocena Sklepa 2009/371/PNZ.
This Regulation aims to amend and expand the provisions of Decision 2009/371/JHA and of Council Decisions 2009/934/JHA [5], 2009/935/JHA [6], 2009/936/JHA [7] and 2009/968/JHA [8] implementing Decision 2009/371/JHA.
Namen te uredbe je spremeniti in razširiti določbe Sklepa 2009/371/PNZ ter sklepov Sveta 2009/934/PNZ [5], 2009/935/PNZ [6], 2009/936/PNZ [7] in 2009/968/PNZ [8] o izvajanju Sklepa 2009/371/PNZ.
Since the amendments to be made are of a substantial number and nature, those Decisions should, in the interests of clarity, be replaced in their entirety in relation to the Member States bound by this Regulation.
Zadevnih sprememb je tako po številu kot vsebini veliko, zato bi bilo treba zavoljo jasnosti navedene sklepe v celoti nadomestiti, kar zadeva države članice, za katere je ta uredba zavezujoča.
Europol as established by this Regulation should replace and assume the functions of Europol as established by Decision 2009/371/JHA, which, as a consequence, should be repealed.
Europol, ustanovljen s to uredbo, bi moral nadomestiti in prevzeti funkcije Europola, ustanovljenega s Sklepom 2009/371/PNZ, ki bi ga bilo posledično treba razveljaviti.
As serious crime often occurs across internal borders, Europol should support and strengthen Member States' actions and their cooperation in preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States.
Ker huda kazniva dejanja pogosto segajo preko notranjih meja, bi moral Europol podpirati in krepiti ukrepe držav članic in sodelovanje med njimi pri preprečevanju hudih kaznivih dejanj, ki prizadenejo dve ali več držav članic, in boju proti njim.
Given that terrorism is one of the most significant threats to the security of the Union, Europol should assist Member States in facing common challenges in this regard.
Ker je terorizem ena največjih groženj varnosti Unije, bi moral Europol pomagati državam članicam pri soočanju s skupnimi izzivi na tem področju.
As the Union law enforcement agency, Europol should also support and strengthen actions and cooperation in tackling forms of crime that affect the interests of the Union.
Europol bi kot agencija Unije za preprečevanje, odkrivanje in preiskovanje kaznivih dejanj moral podpirati in krepiti tudi ukrepe in sodelovanje pri preprečevanju tistih oblik kriminalitete, ki vplivajo na interese Unije.
Among the forms of crime with which Europol is competent to deal, organised crime will continue to fall within the scope of Europol's main objectives, as, given its scale, significance and consequences, it also calls for a common approach by the Member States.
Od oblik kriminalitete, za katere je pristojen Europol, se bo med njegove poglavitne cilje še naprej uvrščal organizirani kriminal, saj ta zaradi svojega obsega, pomena in posledic zahteva tudi skupen pristop držav članic.
Europol should also offer support in preventing and combating related criminal offences which are committed in order to procure the means of perpetrating acts in respect of which Europol is competent or to facilitate or perpetrate such acts or to ensure the impunity of committing them.
Europol bi moral nuditi podporo tudi pri preprečevanju in boju proti povezanim kaznivim dejanjem, ki so storjena z namenom pridobitve sredstev za izvrševanje dejanj, za katera je pristojen Europol, ali z namenom omogočanja ali izvrševanja takšnih dejanj ali zagotavljanja nekaznovanja storilcev teh dejanj.
Europol should provide strategic analyses and threat assessments to assist the Council and the Commission in laying down strategic and operational priorities of the Union for fighting crime and in the operational implementation of those priorities.
Europol bi moral zagotoviti strateške analize in ocene ogroženosti, da bi Svetu in Komisiji pomagal pri določitvi strateških in operativnih prednostnih nalog Unije za boj proti kriminalu ter pri operativnem izvajanju teh prednostnih nalog.
Where the Commission so requests in accordance with Article 8 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 [9], Europol should also carry out risk analyses, including in respect of organised crime, insofar as the risks concerned may undermine the application of the Schengen acquis by the Member States.
Če Komisija tako zahteva v skladu s členom 8 Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1053/2013 [9], bi moral Europol prav tako izvesti analize tveganja, tudi glede organiziranega kriminala, kolikor bi zadevna tveganja lahko ogrožala uporabo schengenskega pravnega reda v državah članicah.
Moreover, at the request of the Council or the Commission where appropriate, Europol should provide strategic analyses and threat assessments to contribute to the evaluation of states that are candidates for accession to the Union.
Poleg tega bi moral Europol na zahtevo Sveta ali Komisije po potrebi zagotoviti strateške analize in ocene ogroženosti kot prispevek k oceni držav kandidatk za pristop k Uniji.
Attacks against information systems affecting Union bodies or two or more Member States are a growing menace in the Union, in particular in view of their speed and impact and the difficulty in identifying their sources.
Napadi na informacijske sisteme, ki prizadenejo organe Unije ali dve ali več držav članic, so vedno večja grožnja v Uniji, zlasti zaradi njihove hitrosti in učinka ter težavnega ugotavljanja njihovega izvora.
When considering requests by Europol to initiate an investigation into a serious attack of suspected criminal origin against information systems affecting Union bodies or two or more Member States, Member States should respond to Europol without delay, taking into account the fact that the rapidity of the response is a key factor in successfully tackling computer crime.
Države članice bi morale pri obravnavanju zaprosil Europola za sprožitev preiskave resnih napadov domnevno kaznivega izvora na informacijske sisteme, ki prizadenejo organe Unije ali dve ali več držav članic, Europolu nemudoma odgovoriti in upoštevati dejstvo, da je hitrost odziva ključni dejavnik za uspešno spopadanje z računalniško kriminaliteto.
Given the importance of the inter-agency cooperation, Europol and Eurojust should ensure that necessary arrangements are established to optimise their operational cooperation, taking due account of their respective missions and mandates and of the interests of Member States.
Glede na pomembnost sodelovanja med agencijami bi morala Europol in Eurojust zagotoviti, da se vzpostavi vse potrebno, da bi dosegla čim boljše operativno sodelovanje, pri čemer bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati poslanstvo in pristojnosti vsakega od njiju ter interese držav članic.
In particular, Europol and Eurojust should keep each other informed of any activity involving the financing of joint investigation teams.
Europol in Eurojust bi morala zlasti obveščati drug drugega o kakršni koli dejavnosti, ki vključuje financiranje skupnih preiskovalnih skupin.
When a joint investigation team is set up, the relevant agreement should determine the conditions relating to the participation of the Europol staff in the team.
Ob ustanovitvi skupne preiskovalne skupine bi bilo treba z ustreznim sporazumom določiti pogoje sodelovanja osebja Europola v skupini.
Europol should keep a record of its participation in such joint investigation teams targeting criminal activities falling within the scope of its objectives.
Europol bi moral voditi evidenco sodelovanja pri skupnih preiskovalnih skupinah, ki se spopadajo s kriminalnimi dejavnostmi, ki spadajo med njegove cilje.
Europol should be able to request Member States to initiate, conduct or coordinate criminal investigations in specific cases where cross-border cooperation would add value.
Europol bi moral imeti možnost, da države članice zaprosi, naj uvedejo, vodijo ali usklajujejo preiskave kaznivih dejanj v posameznih primerih, ko bi čezmejno sodelovanje pomenilo dodano vrednost.
Europol should inform Eurojust of such requests.
Europol bi moral o takih zaprosilih obveščati Eurojust.
Europol should be a hub for information exchange in the Union.
Europol bi moral biti središčna točka za izmenjavo informacij v Uniji.
Information collected, stored, processed, analysed and exchanged by Europol includes criminal intelligence which relates to information about crime or criminal activities falling within the scope of Europol's objectives, obtained with a view to establishing whether concrete criminal acts have been committed or may be committed in the future.
Informacije, ki jih Europol zbira, shranjuje, obdeluje, analizira in izmenjuje, vključujejo kriminalističnoobveščevalne informacije, ki se nanašajo na informacije o kaznivih dejanjih ali kriminalnih dejavnostih, ki spadajo med cilje Europola, in so bili pridobljeni z namenom ugotoviti, ali so bila storjena oziroma bi lahko bila v prihodnosti storjena konkretna kazniva dejanja.
In order to ensure Europol's effectiveness as a hub for information exchange, clear obligations should be laid down requiring Member States to provide Europol with the data necessary for it to fulfil its objectives.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitosti Europola kot središčne točke za izmenjavo informacij bi bilo treba določiti jasne obveznosti držav članic, da Europolu zagotovijo podatke, ki jih potrebuje za izpolnitev svojih ciljev.
While implementing such obligations, Member States should pay particular attention to providing data relevant to the fight against crimes considered to be strategic and operational priorities within relevant policy instruments of the Union, in particular the priorities set by the Council in the framework of the EU Policy Cycle for organised and serious international crime.
Pri izvajanju takih obveznosti bi morale države članice posebno pozornost posvečati zagotavljanju ustreznih podatkov za boj proti kaznivim dejanjem, ki veljajo za strateške in operativne prednostne naloge v okviru ustreznih političnih instrumentov Unije, zlasti kar zadeva prednostne naloge, ki jih je določil Svet v okviru političnega cikla EU za boj proti hudim oblikam organizirane mednarodne kriminalitete.
Member States should also endeavour to provide Europol with a copy of bilateral and multilateral exchanges of information with other Member States on crime falling within Europol's objectives.
Države članice bi si morale prizadevati, da bi Europolu zagotovile tudi kopijo dvostranskih in večstranskih izmenjav informacij z drugimi državami članicami o kaznivih dejanjih, ki spadajo med cilje Europola.
When supplying Europol with the necessary information, Member States should also include information about any alleged cyber attacks affecting Union bodies located in their territory.
Države članice bi morale pri zagotavljanju potrebnih informacij Europolu vključiti tudi informacije o domnevnih kibernetskih napadih, ki bi prizadeli organe Unije s sedežem na njihovem ozemlju.
At the same time, Europol should increase the level of its support to Member States, so as to enhance mutual cooperation and the sharing of information.
Hkrati bi moral Europol povečati raven podpore državam članicam, da se izboljšata medsebojno sodelovanje in izmenjava informacij.
Europol should submit an annual report to the European Parliament, to the Council, to the Commission and to national parliaments on the information provided by the individual Member States.
Europol bi moral predložiti letno poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji ter nacionalnim parlamentom o informacijah, ki jih zagotavljajo posamezne države članice.
To ensure effective cooperation between Europol and Member States, a national unit should be set up in each Member State (the ‘national unit’).
V vsaki državi članici bi bilo treba vzpostaviti nacionalno enoto, da se zagotovi učinkovito sodelovanje med Europolom in državami članicami (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nacionalna enota).
The national unit should be the liaison link between national competent authorities and Europol, thereby having a coordinating role in respect of Member States' cooperation with Europol, and thus helping to ensure that each Member State responds to Europol requests in a uniform way.
Nacionalna enota bi morala biti točka za povezavo med nacionalnimi pristojnimi organi in Europolom, pri čemer bi imela usklajevalno vlogo pri vseh dejavnostih sodelovanja držav članic z Europolom in bi tako pomagala zagotoviti enotni odziv posameznih držav članic na zaprosila Europola.
To ensure a continuous and effective exchange of information between Europol and the national units, and to facilitate their cooperation, each national unit should designate at least one liaison officer to be attached to Europol.
Vsaka nacionalna enota bi morala imenovati vsaj enega uradnika za zvezo, ki se dodeli Europolu, da se zagotovi neprekinjena in učinkovita izmenjava informacij med Europolom in nacionalnimi enotami ter olajša njihovo sodelovanje.
Taking into account the decentralised structure of some Member States and the need to ensure rapid exchanges of information, Europol should be allowed to cooperate directly with competent authorities in Member States, subject to the conditions defined by Member States, while keeping the national units informed at the latter's request.
Ob upoštevanju decentralizirane strukture nekaterih držav članic in dejstva, da je treba zagotoviti hitro izmenjavo informacij, bi bilo treba Europolu omogočiti, da sodeluje neposredno s pristojnimi organi v državah članicah, v skladu s pogoji, ki jih postavijo države članice, in na njihovo zahtevo redno obvešča nacionalne enote.
The establishment of joint investigation teams should be encouraged and Europol staff should be able to participate in them.
Spodbujati bi bilo treba ustanavljanje skupnih preiskovalnih skupin, v njih pa bi moralo imeti možnost sodelovanja tudi osebje Europola.
To ensure that such participation is possible in every Member State, Council Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 549/69 [10] provides that Europol staff do not benefit from immunities while they are participating in joint investigation teams.
Zaradi zagotovitve, da bi bilo tovrstno sodelovanje mogoče v vseh državah članicah, Uredba Sveta (Euratom, ESJP, EGS) št. 549/69 [10] določa, da osebje Europola v času, ko sodeluje v preiskovalnih skupinah, ne uživa imunitete.
It is also necessary to improve the governance of Europol, by seeking efficiency gains and streamlining procedures.
Treba je izboljšati tudi upravljanje Europola s prizadevanjem za večjo učinkovitost in racionalizacijo postopkov.
The Commission and the Member States should be represented on the Management Board of Europol (the ‘Management Board’) to effectively supervise its work.
V upravnem odboru Europola (v nadaljnjem besedilu: upravni odbor) bi morale biti zastopane Komisija in države članice, da se zagotovi učinkovit nadzor nad njegovim delovanjem.
The members and the alternate members of the Management Board should be appointed taking into account their relevant managerial, administrative and budgetary skills and knowledge of law enforcement cooperation.
Imenovati bi bilo treba člane in nadomestne člane upravnega odbora, ob upoštevanju njihove usposobljenosti za vodstvene, upravne in proračunske naloge ter znanja o sodelovanju na področju preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj.
Alternate members should act as members in the absence of the member.
Nadomestni člani bi morali nastopati kot polnopravni člani, če je član odsoten.
All parties represented on the Management Board should make efforts to limit the turnover of their representatives, with a view to ensuring the continuity of the Management Board's work.
Vse strani, zastopane v upravnem odboru, bi si morale prizadevati za omejitev menjav svojih predstavnikov, z namenom zagotoviti kontinuiteto pri delu upravnega odbora.
All parties should aim to achieve a balanced representation between men and women on the Management Board.
Vse strani bi si morale prizadevati doseči usklajeno zastopanost moških in žensk v upravnem odboru.
The Management Board should be able to invite non-voting observers whose opinion may be relevant for the discussion, including a representative designated by the Joint Parliamentary Scrutiny Group (JPSG).
Upravni odbor bi moral imeti možnost povabiti opazovalce brez glasovalne pravice, katerih mnenje je lahko pomembno za razpravo, vključno s predstavnikom, ki ga imenuje skupina za skupni parlamentarni nadzor.
The Management Board should be given the necessary powers, in particular to set the budget, verify its execution, and adopt the appropriate financial rules and planning documents, as well as adopt rules for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest in respect of its members, establish transparent working procedures for decision-making by the Executive Director of Europol, and adopt the annual activity report.
Upravni odbor bi moral imeti potrebne pristojnosti, zlasti za določanje proračuna, preverjanje njegovega izvajanja in sprejemanje ustreznih finančnih pravil ter dokumentov, ki zadevajo načrtovanje, pa tudi sprejemanje pravil za preprečevanje in obvladovanje nasprotij interesov v zvezi s svojimi člani, določanje preglednih delovnih postopkov za sprejemanje odločitev izvršnega direktorja Europola ter sprejemanje letnih poročil o dejavnostih.
It should exercise the powers of appointing authority vis-à-vis staff of the agency, including the Executive Director.
Izvrševati bi moral pooblastila organa za imenovanja, kar zadeva osebje agencije, vključno z izvršnim direktorjem.
To ensure the efficient day-to-day functioning of Europol, the Executive Director should be its legal representative and manager, acting independently in the performance of his or her duties and ensuring that Europol carries out the tasks provided for by this Regulation.
Da se zagotovi učinkovito sprotno delovanje Europola, bi izvršni direktor moral biti njegov zakoniti zastopnik in upravitelj, ki pri izpolnjevanju svojih obveznosti nastopa neodvisno in zagotavlja, da Europol izvaja naloge, ki jih določa ta uredba.