natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to provide system security within the interconnected transmission system, it is essential to establish a common understanding of the requirements for High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) systems and direct current-connected power park modules (DC-connected power park modules).
Notranja ovojnica
the voltage control may be operated with or without a deadband around the setpoint selectable in a range from zero to +/– 5 % of reference 1 pu network voltage.
Območje Q/Pmax
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1448
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1448
amending Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 establishing implementing rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 as regards proceedings before the Community Plant Variety Office
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 o določitvi izvedbenih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2100/94 v zvezi s postopkom, ki poteka na Uradu Skupnosti za rastlinske sorte
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 114 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2100/94 z dne 27. julija 1994 o žlahtniteljskih pravicah v Skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba) in zlasti člena 114 Uredbe,
For the purposes of the basic Regulation, Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 [2] lays down rules on the proceedings before the Community Plant Variety Office (‘the Office’).
Za namene osnovne uredbe Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 874/2009 [2] določa pravila v zvezi s postopkom, ki poteka na Uradu skupnosti za rastlinske sorte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Urad).
The efficient administration of the proceedings before the Office requires that parties to such proceedings should be designated by their email address, apart from their name and address, where an email address is used by the party concerned.
Za učinkovito upravljanje postopka, ki poteka na Uradu, bi bilo treba stranke v takem postopku določiti z imenom, naslovom in tudi elektronskim naslovom, kadar ga zadevna stranka uporablja.
It should be specified that the official designations of legal persons, companies, and firms as referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 should be the designations as recorded in the respective Member State or third country.
Treba bi bilo določiti, da je uradni naziv pravnih oseb, družb in firm iz člena 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 tisti naziv, ki je evidentiran v zadevni državi članici ali tretji državi.
The successor in title of a Community plant variety right should be given the possibility to use another official language of the European Union than the one that has been chosen by the initial party to the proceedings before the Office or the Board of Appeal.
Pravni naslednik žlahtniteljske pravice v Skupnosti bi moral imeti možnost uporabe drugega uradnega jezika Evropske unije namesto tistega, ki ga je izbrala prva stranka v postopku, ki poteka na Uradu ali Odboru za pritožbe.
In order to reduce translation costs and to speed up the proceedings, the Office or the Board of Appeal, with the agreement of all parties to the proceedings, should be able to use only one of the official languages of the European Union during those proceedings.
Za zmanjšanje stroškov prevoda in pospešitev postopka bi bilo treba Uradu ali Odboru za pritožbe s soglasjem vseh strank v postopku omogočiti uporabo samo enega izmed uradnih jezikov Evropske unije v navedenem postopku.
The same should apply to the hearing of witnesses and experts and to the translation of documents of parties to the proceedings.
Enako bi moralo veljati za zaslišanja prič in strokovnjakov ter prevode dokumentov strank v postopku.
For the same reason, it should be possible to limit the translation of lengthy documents to their extracts or summaries.
Iz istega razloga bi bilo treba v primeru obsežnih dokumentov omogočiti, da se prevodi omejijo na izvlečke ali povzetke.
The increasing complexity of the law governing Community plant variety rights requires that the legally qualified members, referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009, are graduates in law with recognised experience in the field of intellectual property, plant variety rights or plant variety registration.
Zaradi čedalje večje zapletenosti prava, ki ureja žlahtniteljske pravice v Skupnosti, morajo imeti pravno usposobljeni člani iz člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 diplomo iz prava in priznane izkušnje na področju intelektualne lastnine, žlahtniteljskih pravic ali registracije rastlinskih sort.
It is appropriate that the members of the Board of Appeal receive remuneration for the performance of their assignments, the level of which should be determined by the Administrative Council, based on a proposal by the President of the Office.
Primerno je, da člani Odbora za pritožbe prejmejo plačilo za opravljanje svojih nalog, višino plačila pa bi moral določiti Upravni svet na predlog predsednika Urada.
For the purpose of clarity, it should be made explicit that the Examination Office is entrusted with responsibility for a specific scope of the technical examination.
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba izrecno določiti, da se Uradu za preskušanje sort zaupa odgovornost za določen obseg preskušanja.
It should further be made explicit that the Administrative Council may amend or cancel such designation at the request of the Examination Office.
Nadalje bi bilo treba izrecno določiti, da lahko Upravni svet na zahtevo Urada za preskušanje sort spremeni ali prekliče tako določitev.
For the purpose of transparency, the Administrative Council should be able to make such designation subject to certain requirements and to establish the procedures to be followed by the Office for such designation.
Zaradi preglednosti bi moral imeti Upravni svet možnost, da to določi v skladu z nekaterimi zahtevami in vzpostavi postopke, ki jih mora Urad upoštevati za tako določitev.
Experience has shown that it is important to develop guiding principles concerning plant material to be submitted for testing the distinctiveness, uniformity and stability in the framework of applications for Community plant variety rights and the transfer of such plant material between Examination Offices.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da je treba pripraviti vodilna načela v zvezi z rastlinskim materialom, ki se predloži za preskušanje razločljivosti, izenačenosti in nespremenljivosti v okviru prijav za žlahtniteljske pravice v Skupnosti in prenosa takega rastlinskega materiala med uradi za preskušanje sort.
It is therefore appropriate that the Administrative Council adopts such principles.
Zato je primerno, da Upravni svet sprejme taka načela.
It should be set out in a clearer manner in Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 that that provision deals with agencies and sub-offices acting as Examination Offices.
V členu 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 bi bilo treba bolj jasno določiti, da navedena določba zadeva agencije in podurade, ki delujejo kot uradi za preskušanje sort.
Furthermore, that provision should clearly set out that the designation of such agency or the establishment of such sub-offices should follow the same rules as the designation of an Examination Office.
Prav tako bi bilo treba v navedeni določbi jasno opredeliti, da bi morala za določitev take agencije ali ustanovitev poduradov veljati ista pravila kot za določitev Urada za preskušanje sort.
Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 should be aligned with the wording of the other provisions of that Regulation.
Člen 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 bi bilo treba uskladiti z besedilom drugih določb navedene uredbe.
It should further be specified that only acts performed after the signature of the written agreement are to be considered, as far as third parties are concerned, to be acts of the Office.
Nadalje bi bilo treba določiti, da se samo dejanja, ki so bila izvedena po podpisu pisnega sporazuma in kolikor to zadeva tretje stranke, štejejo kot dejanja Urada.
The comparability of the auditing reports referred to in Article 15(5) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 requires that those reports are submitted in a harmonised form, which should be determined by the Office.
Da se zagotovi primerljivost revizijskih poročil iz člena 15(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009, je treba navedena poročila predložiti v usklajeni obliki, ki bi jo moral določiti Urad.
Furthermore, the Office should be able to reduce the fee to be paid to the Examination Office where the auditing report is not delivered in time.
Prav tako bi bilo treba omogočiti, da Urad plača nižjo pristojbino Uradu za preskušanje sort, kadar revizijsko poročilo ni dostavljeno pravočasno.
Article 15(6) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 should be reworded to allow for an amendment of the designation of an Examination Office.
Člen 15(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 bi bilo treba spremeniti, da se omogoči sprememba določitve Urada za preskušanje sort.
An effective, efficient, and expeditious examination of applications for a Community plant variety right requires that those applications are filed at the Office only, and not at designated agencies or sub-offices established pursuant to Article 30(4) of the basic Regulation.
Za uspešno, učinkovito in hitro obdelavo prijav za žlahtniteljsko pravico v Skupnosti je nujno, da se navedene prijave vložijo samo pri Uradu in ne pri določenih agencijah ali poduradih, ustanovljenih v skladu s členom 30(4) osnovne uredbe.
Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 contains the rules on the receipt of applications.
Člen 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 vsebuje pravila o prejemu prijav.
The confirmation of receipt should also refer to the nature of the documents received.
Potrdilo o prejemu bi moralo vsebovati tudi informacije o naravi prejetih dokumentov.
It should further be specified that the confirmation of receipt is to be transmitted to the Office by electronic means.
Nadalje bi bilo treba določiti, da se potrdilo o prejemu posreduje Uradu v elektronski obliki.
Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 specifies the information to be provided by the applicant for an application for a property right in respect of the variety and for an application for official acceptance of the variety for certification and marketing where official acceptance includes an official description of the variety.
Člen 18(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 določa podatke, ki jih prijavitelj zagotovi za prijavo za lastninsko pravico v zvezi s sorto in za prijavo za uradni sprejem sorte za potrjevanje in trženje, kadar uradni sprejem vsebuje tudi uradni opis sorte.
Since the latter application can be submitted in a country or to a regional organisation that is not a member of the International Union for the Protection of new Varieties of Plants (‘UPOV’), it is appropriate to delete the reference to a Member State and the UPOV in that Article with respect to the application for official acceptance of the variety for certification.
Ker je slednjo prijavo mogoče predložiti v državi ali predložiti regionalni organizaciji, ki ni članica Mednarodne zveze za varstvo novih sort rastlin (v nadaljnjem besedilu: UPOV), je v navedenem členu primerno črtati sklic na državo članico in UPOV v zvezi s prijavo za uradni sprejem sorte za potrjevanje.
It should be specified in Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 that no application can be submitted by a person other than the breeder, unless the breeder has duly mandated that person to do so, and that the application should contain the name and the address of the procedural representative.
V členu 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 bi bilo treba določiti, da lahko prijavo predloži samo žlahtnitelj, razen če je žlahtnitelj ustrezno pooblastil drugo osebo, in tudi, da bi morala prijava vsebovati ime in naslov zastopnika v postopku.
The wording of that provision should further be aligned with the wording of the technical questionnaire established in line with the international standards of the UPOV.
Besedilo navedene določbe bi bilo nadalje treba uskladiti z besedilom tehničnega vprašalnika, pripravljenega v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi UPOV.
For the purpose of clarity and to avoid any gaps or overlaps, it is appropriate to specify in Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 that, as to test guidelines, the UPOV guidelines per genera and species apply where there is no decision of the Administrative Council or no provisional decision of the President of the Office.
Da se zagotovi jasnost in preprečijo morebitne vrzeli ali prekrivanja, je v členu 22 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 primerno določiti, da se kot smernice za preskušanje uporabljajo smernice UPOV po rodovih in vrstah, kadar Upravni svet ne izda smernic ali predsednik Urada ne izda začasnih smernic.
Where the former guidelines are not available, the national guidelines that have been developed by the competent authority that is in charge of the technical examination of the plant variety should apply, provided that the President of the Office agrees.
Če take smernice niso na voljo, bi se morale uporabljati nacionalne smernice, ki jih je pripravil pristojni organ, zadolžen za preskušanje rastlinskih sort, če se s tem strinja predsednik Urada.
Decisions on test guidelines should have a permanent nature due to their significance for their users.
Smernice za preskušanje bi morale biti trajnega značaja, ker so bistvenega pomena za njihove uporabnike.
Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 should therefore be deleted to reflect that the decision of the President of the Office, when exercising the power referred to in paragraph 1 of that Article, is not a provisional one.
Člen 23(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 bi bilo zato treba črtati, da bi bilo jasno, da smernice predsednika Urada pri izvajanju pristojnosti iz odstavka 1 navedenega člena niso začasne.
It is appropriate to update Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 to reflect that the exchanges between the Office and the Examination Offices are now done by electronic means.
Primerno je posodobiti člen 24 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009, da bo jasno, da izmenjave med Uradom in uradi za preskušanje sort zdaj potekajo v elektronski obliki.
Regarding the acceptance of an examination report of an examination that has been carried out or is in the process of being carried out by a competent authority outside the territory of the European Union, it is necessary to request that a written agreement is concluded on the basis of the consent of the Administrative Council of the Office.
Glede sprejetja poročila o preskušanju v zvezi s preskušanjem, ki ga je izvedel ali ga izvaja pristojni organ zunaj ozemlja Evropske unije, je treba zahtevati, da se sklene pisni sporazum na podlagi dovoljenja Upravnega sveta Urada.
In addition, it may be possible for the Office to consider a report produced by a competent authority of a third country or of a regional organisation that is a member of the UPOV as well as of a party to the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Protection (‘TRIPS’).
Poleg tega lahko Urad upošteva poročilo pristojnega organa tretje države ali regionalne organizacije, ki je članica UPOV, in pogodbenice Sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih zaščite intelektualne lastnine (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum TRIPS).
Finally, it is appropriate to add a requirement to have information on the experience of the third country concerning the testing of the genera or species concerned.
Nazadnje je primerno dodati zahtevo za informacije o izkušnjah tretjih držav glede preskušanja zadevnih rodov ali vrst.
Taking into account that the Office is to grant a plant variety protection right for all genera and species, it is appropriate to allow the Office to request a competent authority of a third country or of a regional organisation that is a member of UPOV, as well as of a third country that is a party to TRIPS, to perform a technical examination, where there is no possibility to perform the technical examination for the specific genera and species in an Examination Office in the European Union, and where an examination report on the results of a technical examination is not available or is not expected to become available.
Ob upoštevanju, da Urad podeli žlahtniteljsko pravico za vse rodove in vrste, je primerno Uradu dovoliti, da od pristojnega organa tretje države ali regionalne organizacije, ki je članica UPOV, in tretje države, ki je pogodbenica Sporazuma TRIPS, zahteva izvedbo preskušanja, kadar ni možnosti, da bi se preskušanje določenih rodov in vrst izvedlo v Uradu za preskušanje sort v Evropski uniji, in kadar poročilo o rezultatih preskušanja ni na voljo ali se ne pričakuje, da bo na voljo.
A written agreement should be concluded on the basis of the consent of the Administrative Council of the Office, based on certain conditions.
Pisni sporazum bi bilo treba skleniti na podlagi dovoljenja Upravnega sveta Urada v skladu z določenimi pogoji.
Taking into account that the applications for Community plant variety rights are no longer dealt with by national agencies, it is appropriate to adapt the wording of Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 accordingly.
Ob upoštevanju, da prijav za žlahtniteljske pravice v Skupnosti ne obravnavajo več nacionalne agencije, je primerno prilagoditi besedilo člena 28 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009.
In order to limit the administrative burden, it should not be necessary to request a certified copy of the patent certificate(s).
Da se omeji upravno breme, overjen izvod patentnega potrdila ne bi smel biti obvezen.
The appellants sometimes need to use procedural representatives.
Pritožniki včasih potrebujejo zastopnike v postopku.
It is therefore appropriate to specify in Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 that the notice is to contain elements regarding a possible procedural representative appointed by the appellant.
Zato je v členu 45 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 primerno določiti, da mora pritožba vsebovati elemente v zvezi z morebitnim zastopnikom v postopku, ki ga imenuje pritožnik.
For reasons of efficiency, the Board of Appeal should have the possibility to deal with several appeals in the same proceedings or joint proceedings.
Zaradi učinkovitosti bi moral imeti Odbor za pritožbe možnost, da v istem postopku ali združenem postopku obravnava več pritožb.
Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 should be supplemented with several specifications, in order to adapt that provision to the needs identified and the experience gained in the application of that Regulation and other Union legislation.
Člen 53(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 bi bilo treba dopolniti, da se navedena določba prilagodi ugotovljenim potrebam in pridobljenim izkušnjam pri uporabi navedene uredbe in druge zakonodaje Unije.
For reasons of legal certainty, it is appropriate to add rules with regard to a decision of the Office in proceedings for nullity and cancellation as referred to in Article 20 and Article 21, respectively, of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi pravne varnosti je primerno, da se dodajo pravila v zvezi z odločbo Urada v postopku za razglasitev ničnosti iz člena 20 osnovne uredbe in razveljavitev iz člena 21 osnovne uredbe.
Taking into account that the Office has developed electronic tools, the certificate for a Community plant variety right should be delivered by electronic means.
Ob upoštevanju, da je Urad razvil elektronska orodja, bi bilo treba potrdilo o žlahtniteljski pravici v Skupnosti izdati v elektronski obliki.
Taking into account that there is no procedure for the use of an electronic signature, it is appropriate to change the reference in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 and to refer to electronic authentication only.
Ob upoštevanju, da ne obstaja postopek za uporabo elektronskega podpisa, je primerno spremeniti sklic v členu 57 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 in se sklicevati samo na elektronsko avtentikacijo.
In the interest of clarity, it is appropriate to specify in Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 that the Office may grant an advance to witnesses and experts.
Zaradi jasnosti je v členu 62 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 primerno določiti, da lahko Urad pričam in strokovnjakom izplača predujem.
In addition, it is necessary to clarify the rules on the final liability for the payment with regard to the Office or the party concerned.
Poleg tega je treba pojasniti pravila glede končne odgovornosti za plačilo v zvezi z Uradom ali zadevno stranko.
There is a need for more precise rules with regard to the content of the minutes referred to in Article 63 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009.
Potrebna so natančnejša pravila glede vsebine zapisnika iz člena 63 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009.
In addition, taking into account that in appeal proceedings the person conducting the oral procedure is not an employee of the Office, it is appropriate to amend that provision to ensure that an external person to the Office can conduct that procedure.
Ker oseba, ki vodi ustni postopek v pritožbenem postopku, ni uslužbenec Urada, je poleg tega primerno spremeniti navedeno določbo za zagotovitev, da lahko postopek vodi zunanja oseba.
It is appropriate to introduce further detailed rules concerning the service of documents by electronic or other technical means.
Primerno je določiti dodatna podrobna pravila v zvezi z vročitvijo dokumentov v elektronski obliki ali z drugimi tehničnimi sredstvi.
It is also necessary to clarify to whom the Office shall address the notification in case of one or several procedural representatives appointed by one or several parties.
Treba je tudi pojasniti, na koga Urad naslovi uradno obvestilo v primeru enega ali več zastopnikov v postopku, ki jih je imenovala ena ali več strank.
In Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 it should be specified that the President of the Office also has to determine the period within which a document will be deemed to have been notified in case of public notice.
V členu 67 Uredbe (ES) št. 874/2009 bi bilo treba določiti, da mora predsednik Urada določiti tudi rok, v katerem se bo dokument štel za vročenega v primeru javne objave.
For reasons of transparency, it is appropriate to publish in the Official Gazette the extension of time limits adopted by the President of the Office at the commencement of each calendar year.
Zaradi preglednosti je primerno v Uradnem listu objaviti podaljšanje rokov, ki jih je sprejel predsednik Urada na začetku vsakega koledarskega leta.
Furthermore, it is reasonable to allow for the extension of the time limit if one party to the proceedings has faced an interruption of the electronic connection and is able to demonstrate the interruption from the service provider.
Poleg tega je smiselno omogočiti podaljšanje roka, če ima ena od strank v postopku prekinjeno elektronsko povezavo in lahko dokaže to prekinitev s ponudnikom storitev.
For the purpose of simplifying the procedures and optimising resources, it is appropriate to request the parties to proceedings acting in common to notify the name of one procedural representative and to determine the rules for situations where they failed to do so.
Da se poenostavijo postopki in optimizirajo viri, je primerno zahtevati, da stranke, ki sodelujejo v postopku, sporočijo ime enega zastopnika v postopku, in določiti pravila za primere, kadar stranke tega ne storijo.
It is also appropriate to add rules on the transfer of a Community plant variety right by a party to the proceedings to more than one person, where more than one procedural representative has been appointed.
Prav tako je primerno dodati pravila o prenosu žlahtniteljske pravice v Skupnosti stranke v postopku na več kot eno osebo, kadar je bil imenovan več kot en zastopnik v postopku.
Taking into account that the Office intends to reduce the use of paper documents, it is no longer necessary to provide several copies in case the credentials cover more than one proceeding.
Ob upoštevanju, da namerava Urad zmanjšati uporabo papirnih dokumentov, ni več treba predložiti več izvodov, če poverilnice veljajo za več kot en postopek.
In order to ensure that the other parties to the proceedings are accurately informed, the conditions under which the entry of a procedural representative in the register of the Office will be deleted should be specified.
Za zagotovitev, da so druge stranke v postopku pravilno obveščene, bi bilo treba določiti pogoje, v skladu s katerimi se iz registra Urada črta vpis zastopnika v postopku.