natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On the basis of this analysis, the Commission considered that market situation found in Brazil and in the USA are sufficiently competitive.
Vprašalniki za primerljivo državo so bili poslani navedenima sodelujočima proizvajalcema.
Therefore, the Commission decided to select Brazil and the USA as potential analogue country.
Ko je proizvajalec iz Brazilije prejel navedeni vprašalnik, je Komisijo obvestil, da preklicuje sodelovanje v preiskavi.
The analogue country questionnaires were sent to the two above mentioned cooperating producers.
Komisija je od proizvajalca v ZDA prejela ustrezen odgovor.
However, after having received the analogue country questionnaire, the Brazilian producer informed the Commission of its decision to withdraw its cooperation in the investigation.
Ugotovila je, da je sodelujoči proizvajalec iz ZDA povezan z enim od pritožnikov, kot je trdil proizvajalec izvoznik iz Belorusije.
The Commission received an appropriate response from the USA producer.
A četudi je proizvajalec iz primerljive države povezan s proizvajalcem Unije, taka povezava ne izniči določitve normalne vrednosti niti ne vpliva nanjo [7].
The Commission observed that the USA cooperating producer was related with one of the complainants, as alleged by the Belarusian exporting producer.
Komisija je na tej stopnji postopka sklenila, da so ZDA ustrezna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
However, even if a producer in the analogue country is related to a Union producer, such a link does not invalidate or affect the determination of the normal value [7].
Normalna vrednost (primerljiva država)
The Commission concluded at this stage of the proceeding that the USA is an appropriate analogue country under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Kot podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti so bile skladno s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe uporabljene informacije, ki jih je zagotovil sodelujoči proizvajalec v primerljivi državi.
Normal value (analogue country)
Prvič, Komisija je preučila, ali je bil v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe celotni obseg prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam v ZDA reprezentativen.
The information received from the cooperating producer in the analogue country was used as a basis for the determination of the normal value, pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se je celotni obseg prodaje primerjal s celotnim obsegom izvoza zadevnega izdelka, ki ga je beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik izvozil v Unijo.
First, the Commission examined whether, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the total volume of the sales of the like product to independent customers in the USA was representative.
Na tej podlagi je Komisija ugotovila, da se je podobni izdelek na trgu ZDA prodajal v reprezentativnih količinah.
To this end, the total sales volume was compared to the total volume of the product concerned exported by the Belarusian exporting producer to the Union.
Komisija je nato opredelila, katere vrste izdelka, ki jih je na domačem trgu prodajal proizvajalec v primerljivi državi, so bile enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, ki jih je za izvoz v Unijo prodal beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik.
On that basis, the Commission found that the like product was sold in representative quantities on the US market.
Na podlagi vrste izdelka je obseg prodaje v ZDA primerjala z izvozom beloruskega proizvajalca izvoznika v Unijo.
Second, the Commission identified the product types sold domestically by the producer in the analogue country that were identical or directly comparable with the types sold for export to the Union by the Belarusian exporting producer.
Ta primerjava je pokazala, da so se vse vrste izdelka v ZDA prodajale v reprezentativnih količinah.
It compared on a product type basis the sales volume in US with the exports by the Belarusian exporting producer to the Union.
Komisija je nato v zvezi s proizvajalcem v primerljivi državi proučila, ali se lahko za vsako vrsto podobnega izdelka, ki je bila prodana na domačem trgu, šteje, da je bila prodana v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This comparison showed that all product types were sold in representative quantities in the US.
Pri tem je bil za vsako vrsto izdelka določen delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu med obdobjem preiskave.
The Commission subsequently examined for the analogue country producer whether each type of the like product sold domestically could be considered as being sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Prodajne transakcije so se štele za dobičkonosne, če je bila cena na enoto enaka ali višja od proizvodnih stroškov.
This was done by establishing for each product type the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market during the investigation period.
Tako so se določili proizvodni stroški za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki ga je ameriški proizvajalec proizvedel v obdobju preiskave.
The sales transactions were considered profitable where the unit price was equal or above the cost of production.
Kadar je obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, ki je bila enaka izračunanim proizvodnim stroškom ali višja od njih, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste in kadar je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena navedene vrste enaka proizvodnim stroškom ali višja od njih, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni.
The cost of production of each product type produced by the US producer during the investigation period was therefore determined.
Ta cena je bila izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje navedene vrste izdelka v obdobju preiskave.
Where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average sales price of that type was equal to or higher than the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
Za vse vrste izdelka, ki jih je prodajal proizvajalec v primerljivi državi, je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka predstavljal 80 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka.
This price was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that type made during the investigation period.
Vse vrste izdelka, ki so se izvažale iz Belorusije v Unijo, so se prodajale tudi v ZDA.
For all product types sold by the analogue country producer, the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or more of the total sales volume of that type.
Zato ni bilo treba določiti normalne vrednosti za nobeno izvoženo vrsto izdelka.
Finally, all the product types exported from Belarus to the Union were also sold in the USA.
Izvozna cena
Therefore, there was no need to construct the normal value for any product types exported.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik iz Belorusije je v Unijo izvažal prek povezanih trgovcev v Avstriji, Litvi, na Poljskem, v Nemčiji in ZDA ali pa je izdelke neposredno prodajal prvim neodvisnim strankam.
Export price
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 13, so bili trije glavni povezani trgovci preverjeni na kraju samem.
The Belarusian cooperating exporting producer exported to the Union either through related traders located in Austria, Lithuania, Poland, Germany and the USA or sold directly to the first independent customers.
Pri neposredni prodaji prvim neodvisnim strankam je bila izvozna cena dejansko plačana ali plačljiva cena za zadevni izdelek, ko je bil ta prodan za izvoz v Unijo, v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
As indicated in recital 13 above the three main related traders were verified on spot.
Pri prodaji prek povezanih trgovcev, ki so delovali kot uvozniki, je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi člena 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
For the direct sales from exporting producer to the first independent customers, the export price was the price actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
V tem primeru se je cena prilagodila za vse stroške, ki so nastali med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s prodajnimi, splošnimi in administrativnimi stroški („PSA stroški“) (ki so znašali od približno 1–2,5 %), ter za primerno stopnjo dobička, ki so jo imeli trgovci pri prodaji (manj kot 1 %).
For the sales made through related traders acting as an importer, the export price was established on the basis of the Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Primerjava
In this case, adjustments to the price were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses (ranging from around 1 % to 2,5 %), and for a reasonable margin of profit for the traders involved in the sale (below 1 %).
Komisija je normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno vzorčenega proizvajalca izvoznika primerjala na podlagi franko tovarna.
Comparison
Kadar je bilo to potrebno zaradi zagotovitve poštene primerjave, je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno prilagodila za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price of the sampled exporting producer on an ex-works basis.
V zvezi z izvoznimi cenami proizvajalca izvoznika so bile izvedene prilagoditve za stroške prevoza, zavarovanja in manipulativne stroške (od približno 4 % do 7,5 %, odvisno od zadevnega povezanega trgovca ali proizvajalca izvoznika), stroške kredita in bančne stroške (0–1,5 %, odvisno od zadevnega povezanega trgovca ali proizvajalca izvoznika), ki skupaj predstavljajo približno 8 % vrednosti prodaje.
Where justified by the need to ensure a fair comparison, the Commission adjusted the normal value and/or the export price for differences affecting prices and price comparability, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi z domačimi cenami proizvajalca iz primerljive države so bile izvedene prilagoditve za stroške notranjega prevoza in manipulativne stroške (v povprečju 5,3 % vrednosti prodaje) ter stroške kredita (s povprečno letno stopnjo 1,15 %).
As regards export prices of the exporting producer, adjustments were made for transport, insurance and handling (ranging from around 4 % to 7,5 % depending on the related trader concerned or the exporting producer), credit cost and bank charges (ranging from 0 % to 1,5 % depending on related trader concerned or the exporting producer), representing in total about 8 % of the value of sales.
Primerjava je bila izvedena za 100 % vrst izdelka, ki ga v Unijo izvažajo in tam prodajajo beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik in njegovi povezani trgovci.
Concerning domestic prices of the analogue country producer, adjustments were made for domestic transportation costs and handling (on average 5,3 % of the value of sales), as well as credit costs (at a yearly rate of 1,15 %).
Med zaslišanjem 14. oktobra 2016 so predstavniki beloruskega proizvajalca izvoznika trdili, da bi morala biti normalna vrednost prilagojena tako, da bi izražala povprečne cene nakupov odpadnih kovin in njihov delež porabe pri proizvodnji zadevnega izdelka v Belorusiji.
The comparison was made for 100 % of the product types exported and sold in the Union by the Belarusian exporting producer and its related traders.
Komisija, prvič, poudarja, da normalna vrednost ni bila konstruirana, temveč je temeljila samo na prodaji, tako da je taka prilagoditev na ravni določanja normalne vrednosti izključena.
During a hearing held on 14 October 2016, the representatives of the Belarusian exporting producer claimed the normal value should be adjusted to reflect the average prices of scrap purchases and its consumption ratio in the production of the product concerned in Belarus.
Drugič, razume, da je ta družba morda želela izpostaviti vprašanje poštene primerjave, zato je preučila to trditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(k).
The Commission, first, underlines that normal value has not been constructed, but was based only on sales, so that such an adjustment is excluded at the level of establishing normal value.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik kupoval odpadne kovine od lokalnih ali ruskih dobaviteljev.
The Commission, second, understands that this company may have wanted to raise an issue of fair comparison and thus analysed this claim under Article 2(10)(k).
Komisija opozarja, da se cene in stroški v Belorusiji kot državi brez tržnega gospodarstva štejejo za izkrivljene.
The investigation showed that the Belarusian exporting producer purchased scrap material either from local suppliers or from Russian suppliers.
Tako bi odobritev prilagoditev, pri katerih se upoštevajo beloruske cene in stroški, pa tudi s tem povezani delež porabe, pomenila uporabo izkrivljene beloruske cene.
The Commission notes, that as a non-market economy country, prices and costs in Belarus are considered to be distorted.
Zato je Komisija zavrnila trditev v zvezi s tem.
Thus, granting adjustments relaying on Belarusian prices and cost as well as on the resulting consumption ratio would mean using the distorted Belarusian price.
Komisija ugotavlja, da četudi bi morala dokazati dejansko izkrivljanje beloruskih cen, je v pritožbi na prvi pogled dokazano, da taka izkrivljanja obstajajo in da beloruski izvoznik ni predložil utemeljenega dokaza, da bi zavrnil navedene obtožbe.
Therefore, the Commission rejected this claim in this regard.
V zvezi z odpadnimi kovinami, uvoženimi iz Rusije, je Komisija v preiskavi ugotovila, da je cena surovine v ZDA in Ruski federaciji podobna [8].
Even if the Commission had to demonstrate actual distortion of Belarusian prices, the Commission observes that the complaint has established prima facie that such distortions exist, and the Belarusian exporter has not provided substantiated proof to counter those allegations.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da je delež porabe odpadnih kovin v ZDA podoben deležem, ki jih je navedel beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik, tj. 60–70 %.
With regard to scrap imported from Russia the Commission observed during the investigation that the price of the raw material in the USA and in the Russian Federation is similar [8].
Zato je Komisija začasno sklenila, da nakupna cena odpadnih kovin v ZDA ne vpliva na primerljivost cen.
Moreover, the investigation has shown that the US scrap consumption ratio is similar to the ones reported by the Belarusian exporting producer, i.e. between 60-70 %.
Trditev se začasno zavrne.
Therefore, the Commission provisionally concluded that the scrap purchase price in the USA does not affect price comparability.
Stopnje dampinga
The claim is provisionally rejected.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost vsake vrste podobnega izdelka iz primerljive države (glej uvodno izjavo (47)) primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka.
Dumping margins
Na podlagi tega začasno tehtano povprečje stopenj dampinga, izraženo kot delež cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, znaša 58,4 %.
For the cooperating exporting producer, the Commission compared the weighted average normal value of each type of the like product in the analogue country (see recital 47 above) with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja sodelovanja je visoka, ker je uvoz sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika predstavljal celoten izvoz v Unijo v obdobju preiskave.
On this basis, the provisional weighted average dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, is 58,4 %.
Komisija je na podlagi tega sklenila, da bo preostalo stopnjo dampinga določila na ravni sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika z najvišjo stopnjo dampinga.
The level of cooperation is high because the imports of the cooperating exporting producer constituted the totality of the total exports to the Union during the investigation period.
Začasne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot delež cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, so:
On this basis, the Commission decided to base the residual dumping margin at the level of the cooperating exporting producer with the highest dumping margin.
Družba
Company
Open Joint-Stock Company „Byelorussian Steel Works – Management Company of ‚Byelorussian Metallurgical Company‘ Holding“, Belorusija
Provisional dumping margin
Vse druge družbe
Open Joint-Stock Company ‘Byelorussian Steel Works — Management Company of “Byelorussian Metallurgical Company” Holding’, Belarus
INDUSTRIJA UNIJE
All other companies
Opredelitev pojmov industrija Unije in proizvodnja Unije
UNION INDUSTRY
Podobni izdelek je proizvajalo 31 proizvajalcev Unije.
Definition of Union industry and Union production
Šteje se, da predstavljajo industrijo Unije v smislu člena 4(1) in člena 5(4) osnovne uredbe, zato bodo v nadaljnjem besedilu imenovani „industrija Unije“.
The like product was manufactured by 31 Union producers.
Za določitev celotne proizvodnje Unije v obdobju preiskave so bile uporabljene vse razpoložljive informacije o industriji Unije, kot so informacije iz pritožbe, podatki, ki so jih sporočili proizvajalci Unije in njihovo združenje pred začetkom preiskave in po njem, ter izpolnjeni vprašalniki vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
They are deemed to constitute the Union industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation and will hereinafter be referred to as the ‘Union industry’.
Na tej podlagi je bilo ocenjeno, da je celotna proizvodnja Unije v OP znašala približno 12,7 milijona ton.
All available information concerning the Union industry, such as information provided in the complaint, data collected from Union producers and their association before and after initiation of the investigation and the questionnaire responses of the sampled Union producers, was used in order to establish the total Union production for the investigation period.
Ta podatek vključuje proizvodnjo vseh proizvajalcev Unije, in sicer proizvodnjo vzorčenih in nevzorčenih proizvajalcev, izračunano na podlagi preverjenih podatkov, ki jih je predložil pritožnik.
On this basis, the total Union production was estimated to be around 12,7 million tonnes during the IP.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 8, pet proizvajalcev Unije, vključenih v vzorec, predstavlja 22,4 % ocenjene celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
This figure includes the production of all Union producers, both the sampled producers and the non-sampled producers, calculated on the basis of verified data submitted by the complainant.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba upoštevati, da je proizvodnja zadevnega izdelka v Uniji zelo razdrobljena, kar ponazarja veliko število proizvajalcev Unije, navedeno v uvodni izjavi (56), zato je vzorec petih proizvajalcev reprezentativen za industrijo Unije.
As indicated in recital 8 above, the five Union producers included in the sample represent 22,4 % of the estimated total Union production of the like product.
ŠKODA
In this respect, it should be taken into account that the Union production of the product concerned is very fragmented, which is illustrated by the high number of Union producers mentioned in recital 56 and therefore the sample of five producers is representative for the Union industry.
Uvodna opomba
INJURY
Proizvajalec izvoznik iz Belorusije je trdil, da pritožba ne vsebuje dovolj dokazov prima facie za obstoj škode, zato ta ne bi smela biti sprejeta.
Preliminary remark
Argument zlasti temelji na tem, da so bili v pritožbi napačno predstavljeni domnevni umetno nizki stroški nabave odpadnih kovin, od katerih ima zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik koristi.
The Belarusian exporting producer claimed that there was insufficient prima facie evidence of the existence of injury in the complaint, which therefore should not have been accepted.
Proizvajalec iz Belorusije je navedel, da taka napačna predstavitev povsem izniči pritožbo.
The argument hinges in particular on a wrongful presentation in the complaint of the alleged artificially low scrap procurement costs from which the exporting producer in question benefits.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (19), je Belorusija država brez tržnega gospodarstva, zato je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi metodologije primerljive države.
The Belarusian producer claimed that such misconception invalidated the complaint entirely.
Zato ni bilo treba ugotoviti, ali je beloruski proizvajalec odpadne kovine nabavljal po umetno nizkih cenah.
As mentioned in recital 19 above, Belarus is a non-market economy country and, as a result, normal value was determined on the basis of the analogue country methodology.
Komisiji se ta trditev ne zdi pomembna ali ustrezna niti se ji ne zdi pomembna za ugotavljanje škode, povzročene industriji EU.
Therefore, no determination on whether scrap was procured at artificially low prices by the Belarusian producer was necessary.
Potrošnja Unije
The Commission fails to see the substance or relevance of this claim and its relevance to the determination of injury to the EU industry.
Potrošnja Unije je bila določena na podlagi celotnega obsega prodaje industrije Unije na trgu Unije in celotnega uvoza.
Union consumption
Potrošnja Unije se je med letoma 2012 in 2013 zmanjšala, a se je leta 2014 vrnila na raven iz leta 2012, v obdobju preiskave pa se je še nekoliko povečala.
Union consumption was established on the basis of the total sales volume of the Union industry on the Union market and the total imports.
Potrošnja Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju skupaj povečala za 3 %.
Union consumption decreased between years 2012 and 2013 but returned to its 2012 level in 2014 and moderately increased further in the IP.
Vir: Eurostat, pritožba in izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
Union consumption increased overall by 3 % over the period considered.
Potrošnja (v tonah)
Source: Eurostat, complaint and questionnaire replies.
indeks (2012 = 100)
Imports into the Union from the country concerned
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da sta se obseg in tržni delež uvoza iz Belorusije v Unijo v obravnavanem obdobju razvijala na naslednji način:
Volume and market share of the imports concerned
obseg (v tonah)
During the period considered the imports into the Union from Belarus were found to have developed in terms of volume and market share as follows:
Tržni delež potrošnje EU (v %)
Volume (tonnes)
Obseg uvoza iz Belorusije se je v obravnavanem obdobju skoraj potrojil.
Market share on EU consumption (%)
Tržni delež uvoza iz Belorusije se je v obravnavanem obdobju prav tako povečal, in sicer z 1,8 % v letu 2012 na 5 % v OP.
Import volumes from Belarus almost tripled over the period considered.
Cene uvoza in nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen
The market share of imports from Belarus also increased over the period considered, from 1,8 % in 2012 to 5 % in the IP.
V spodnji preglednici je prikazana povprečna cena uvoza iz Belorusije:
Prices of imports and price undercutting
Vir: Eurostat.
The table below shows the average price of imports from Belarus:
Povprečna cena v EUR/tono
Source: Eurostat.
Povprečne cene uvoza iz Belorusije so se v obravnavanem obdobju znižale v skladu z znižanjem cen odpadnih kovin, saj se odpadki kot surovina uporabljajo tako v Belorusiji kot tudi v Uniji.
Average price in EUR/tonne
Vendar je bilo 25-odstotno znižanje cen izvoza iz Belorusije v EU večje od znižanja cen vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in povprečnih cen drugih večjih izvoznikov zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v istem obdobju.
The average import prices from Belarus decreased during the period considered, following a decrease of prices of scrap, which is used as raw material both in Belarus and in the Union.
Posledično so bile cene uvoza iz Belorusije v OP nižje od cen proizvajalcev Unije in povprečnih cen uvoza iz vseh drugih glavnih tretjih držav, ki so prisotne na trgu.