natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Jamón de Huelva’ (PDO) are hereby approved.
Sprememba specifikacije, objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v zvezi z imenom „Jamón de Huelva“ (ZOP), se odobri.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 195/98 of 26 January 1998 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 on the entry of certain names in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’ provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs ( OJ L 20, 27.1.1998, p. 20).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 195/98 z dne 26. januarja 1998 o dopolnitvi Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2400/96 o vnosu določenih imen v „Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb“, določen v Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2081/92 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila ( UL L 20, 27.1.1998, str. 20).
OJ C 415, 11.11.2016, p. 8.
UL C 415, 11.11.2016, str. 8.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/386
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/386
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 laying down requirements for the performance and the interoperability of surveillance for the single European sky
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1207/2011 o določitvi zahtev glede učinkovitosti in interoperabilnosti nadzora za enotno evropsko nebo
After consulting the Single Sky Committee,
po posvetovanju z Odborom za enotno evropsko nebo,
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 [2] lays down requirements on the systems contributing to the provision of surveillance data, their constituents and associated procedures in order to ensure the harmonisation of performance, the interoperability and the efficiency of those systems within the European air traffic management network and for the purpose of civil-military coordination.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1207/2011 [2] določa zahteve za sisteme, ki prispevajo k zagotavljanju nadzornih podatkov, njihove sestavne dele in pripadajoče postopke, da bi se zagotovili usklajeno delovanje, interoperabilnost in učinkovitost teh sistemov v okviru evropske mreže za upravljanje zračnega prometa ter za namen civilno-vojaškega usklajevanja.
In order to be able to equip aircraft with new or upgraded capabilities, operators need to have the necessary equipment specifications by the dates specified in Articles 5(4) and 5(5) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011.
Da bi zrakoplove lahko opremili z novimi ali posodobljenimi zmogljivostmi, morajo operaterji imeti potrebne specifikacije za opremo do datumov, določenih v členih 5(4) in 5(5) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1207/2011.
However, the relevant certification specifications developed by the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘the Agency’) are to a certain extent inconsistent with the requirements of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 and should be realigned and made consistent with those requirements.
Vendar ustrezne certifikacijske specifikacije, ki jih je oblikovala Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija), niso popolnoma skladne z zahtevami iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1207/2011, zato bi jih bilo treba na novo uskladiti z navedenimi zahtevami.
Consequently, not all operators have been able to equip their new aircraft with the new functionalities ADS-B ‘Out’ and Mode S Enhanced by 8 June 2016.
Nekateri operaterji zato novih zrakoplovov do 8. junija 2016 niso mogli opremiti z novima funkcijama ADS-B „Out“ in Mode S Enhanced.
In addition, stakeholders have reported that, currently, equipped airborne constituents of the surveillance systems are not always compliant with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011.
Poleg tega so zainteresirane strani poročale, da trenutno opremljeni sestavni deli nadzornih sistemov v zraku niso vedno skladni z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1207/2011.
This applies especially to previously deployed Mode S Elementary transponders which appear not to comply with the most recent standard (ED-73E) as provided in the relevant certification specifications of the Agency.
To zlasti velja za vgrajene odzivnike Mode S Elementary, za katere se zdi, da niso skladni z najnovejšim standardom (ED-73E), kakor je določen v ustreznih certifikacijskih specifikacijah Agencije.
The non-compliant Mode S Elementary transponders will need to be made compliant by upgrading them.
Neskladne odzivnike Mode S Elementary je treba posodobiti, da bi jih uskladili z zahtevami.
Considering the requirement to also equip the aircraft with the ADS-B and Mode S Enhanced functionalities, a single upgrade of the airborne constituents with the three functionalities should be necessary for cost efficiency reasons.
Ob upoštevanju zahteve, da je treba zrakoplove opremiti tudi s funkcijama ADS-B in Mode S Enhanced, bi bila zaradi stroškovne učinkovitosti potrebna ena sama posodobitev sestavnih delov v zraku z vsemi tremi funkcijami.
Therefore, the dates by which operators are to comply with the relevant interoperability requirements of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 should be amended, so as to give them sufficient additional time.
Zato bi bilo treba spremeniti datume, do katerih morajo operaterji izpolniti ustrezne zahteve glede interoperabilnosti iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1207/2011, da bi jim omogočili dovolj dodatnega časa.
Taking into account the additional delays in the certification and in the availability of the required equipment that affect the smooth retrofitting of the existing fleet, it is no longer appropriate to distinguish in this regard between aircraft based on the date of their individual certificate of airworthiness.
Ob upoštevanju dodatnih zamud pri certificiranju in razpoložljivosti zahtevane opreme, ki vplivajo na nemoteno naknadno opremljanje obstoječe flote, v tem pogledu ni več primerno razlikovati med zrakoplovi na podlagi datuma njihovega individualnega spričevala o plovnosti.
To comply with their obligations in terms of spectrum protection set out in Article 6 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011, Member States need to ensure that air navigation service providers have the necessary measurement tools and means of compliance in order to avoid the production of harmful interference by ground-based surveillance systems.
Da bi države članice izpolnile svoje obveznosti glede zaščite spektra iz člena 6 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1207/2011, morajo zagotoviti, da imajo izvajalci navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa potrebna merilna orodja in načine usklajevanja za preprečevanje, da bi nadzorni sistemi na zemlji povzročali škodljive motnje.
Taking into account that those means of compliance and tools are not readily available and that the dates by which operators are to comply with the relevant interoperability requirements are now amended, the dates by which Member States are to comply with the relevant spectrum protection requirements of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 should be amended as well, so as to give Member States sufficient additional time to comply with their obligations.
Ob upoštevanju, da navedeni načini usklajevanja in orodja niso brez težav dosegljivi ter da so datumi, da katerih morajo operaterji izpolniti ustrezne zahteve glede interoperabilnosti, zdaj spremenjeni, bi bilo treba datume, do katerih morajo države članice izpolniti ustrezne zahteve glede zaščite spektra iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1207/2011, prav tako spremeniti, da bi dali državam članicam dovolj dodatnega časa za izpolnitev njihovih obveznosti.
In order to ensure consistency, operators of State aircraft should benefit from similar postponements in implementation dates as operators of other aircraft.
Da bi zagotovili skladnost, bi morala za operaterje državnih zrakoplovov veljati podobna podaljšanja datumov za izvedbo kot za operaterje drugih zrakoplovov.
The dates by which Member States are to ensure that State aircraft are compliant with the relevant requirements of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 should therefore also be amended.
Datume, do katerih morajo države članice zagotoviti, da državni zrakoplovi izpolnjujejo ustrezne zahteve iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1207/2011, bi bilo zato prav tako treba spremeniti.
The dates concerning the exemptions to certain categories of aircraft laid down in that Implementing Regulation should be adjusted as well in order to retain the practical effect of those rules, and the references in Annex II thereto should be updated.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba prilagoditi datume glede izvzetij za določene kategorije zrakoplovov iz navedene izvedbene uredbe, da bi ohranili praktični učinek navedenih pravil, prav tako pa bi bilo treba posodobiti sklice v Prilogi II k Izvedbeni uredbi.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1207/2011 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 is amended as follows:
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 1207/2011 se spremeni:
paragraph 4 is deleted;
odstavek 4 se črta,
Operators shall ensure that by 7 June 2020 at the latest:
Operaterji najpozneje do 7. junija 2020 zagotovijo:
aircraft operating flights referred to in Article 2(2) are equipped with secondary surveillance radar transponders having the capabilities set out in Part A of Annex II;
da so zrakoplovi, ki opravljajo lete iz člena 2(2), opremljeni s sekundarnimi nadzornimi radarskimi odzivniki z zmogljivostmi iz dela A Priloge II;
aircraft with a maximum certified take-off mass exceeding 5700 kg or having a maximum cruising true airspeed capability greater than 250 knots, operating flights referred to in Article 2(2), are equipped with secondary surveillance radar transponders having, in addition to the capabilities set out in Part A of Annex II, the capabilities set out in Part B of that Annex;
da so zrakoplovi, katerih največja certificirana vzletna masa presega 5700 kg ali katerih največja hitrost letenja presega 250 vozlov, ki opravljajo lete iz člena 2(2), opremljeni s sekundarnimi nadzornimi radarskimi odzivniki, ki imajo poleg zmogljivosti iz dela A Priloge II tudi zmogljivosti iz dela B navedene priloge;
fixed wing aircraft with a maximum certified take-off mass exceeding 5700 kg or having a maximum cruising true airspeed capability greater than 250 knots, operating flights referred to in Article 2(2), are equipped with secondary surveillance radar transponders having, in addition to the capabilities set out in Part A of Annex II, the capabilities set out in Part C of that Annex.
da so zrakoplovi z nepremičnimi krili, katerih največja certificirana vzletna masa presega 5700 kg ali katerih največja hitrost letenja presega 250 vozlov, ki opravljajo lete iz člena 2(2), opremljeni s sekundarnimi nadzornimi radarskimi odzivniki, ki imajo poleg zmogljivosti iz dela A Priloge II tudi zmogljivosti iz dela C navedene priloge.
Operators shall ensure that aircraft equipped in accordance with paragraph 5 and having a maximum certified take-off mass exceeding 5700 kg or having a maximum cruising true airspeed capability greater than 250 knots operate with antenna diversity as prescribed in paragraph 3.1.2.10.4 of Annex 10 to the Chicago Convention, Volume IV, Fourth Edition, including all amendments up to No 85.
Operaterji zagotovijo, da zrakoplovi, opremljeni v skladu z odstavkom 5 in katerih največja certificirana vzletna masa presega 5700 kg ali katerih največja hitrost letenja presega 250 vozlov, opravljajo lete z uporabo več anten, kot je določeno v odstavku 3.1.2.10.4 Priloge 10 k Čikaški konvenciji, Zvezek IV, četrta izdaja, vključno z vsemi spremembami do št. 85.
Member States may impose carriage requirements in accordance with point (b) of paragraph 5 to all aircraft operating flights referred to in Article 2(2) in areas where surveillance services using the surveillance data identified in Part B of Annex II are provided by air navigation service providers.’;
Države članice lahko uvedejo zahteve za prevoz v skladu s točko (b) odstavka 5 za vse zrakoplove, ki opravljajo lete iz člena 2(2) na območjih, na katerih nadzorne storitve opravljajo izvajalci navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa z uporabo nadzornih podatkov iz dela B Priloge II.“;
in paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 6, ‘5 February 2015’ is replaced by ‘2 January 2020’;
v odstavkih 1 in 3 člena 6 se datum „5. februarja 2015“ nadomesti z datumom „2. januarja 2020“;
in Article 8, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are replaced by the following:
v členu 8 se odstavki 1, 2 in 3 nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Member States shall ensure that, by 7 June 2020 at the latest, State aircraft operating in accordance with Article 2(2) are equipped with secondary surveillance radar transponders having the capability set out in Part A of Annex II.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so državni zrakoplovi, ki opravljajo lete v skladu s členom 2(2), najpozneje do 7. junija 2020 opremljeni s sekundarnimi nadzornimi radarskimi odzivniki z zmogljivostjo iz dela A Priloge II.
Member States shall ensure that, by 7 June 2020 at the latest, transport-type State aircraft with a maximum certified take-off mass exceeding 5700 kg or having a maximum cruising true airspeed capability greater than 250 knots, operating in accordance with Article 2(2) are equipped with secondary surveillance radar transponders having in addition to the capability set out in Part A of Annex II, the capability set out in Part B and Part C of that Annex.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so najpozneje do 7. junija 2020 državni zrakoplovi, namenjeni za prevoz, katerih največja certificirana vzletna masa presega 5700 kg ali katerih največja hitrost letenja presega 250 vozlov, ki opravljajo lete v skladu s členom 2(2), opremljeni s sekundarnimi nadzornimi radarskimi odzivniki, ki imajo poleg zmogljivosti iz dela A Priloge II tudi zmogljivosti iz delov B in C navedene priloge.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission by 1 January 2019 at the latest the list of State aircraft that cannot be equipped with secondary surveillance radar transponders that comply with the requirements set out in Part A of Annex II, together with the justification for non-equipage.
Države članice najpozneje do 1. januarja 2019 pošljejo Komisiji seznam državnih zrakoplovov, ki jih ni mogoče opremiti s sekundarnimi nadzornimi radarskimi odzivniki, ki so v skladu z zahtevami iz dela A Priloge II, ter utemeljitev za neopremljenost.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission by 1 January 2019 at the latest the list of transport-type State aircraft with a maximum certified take-off mass exceeding 5700 kg or having a maximum cruising true airspeed capability greater than 250 knots, that cannot be equipped with secondary surveillance radar transponders that comply with the requirements set out in Part B and Part C of Annex II, together with the justification for non-equipage.
Države članice najpozneje do 1. januarja 2019 pošljejo Komisiji seznam državnih zrakoplovov, namenjenih za prevoz, katerih največja certificirana vzletna masa presega 5700 kg ali katerih največja hitrost letenja presega 250 vozlov, ki jih ni mogoče opremiti s sekundarnimi nadzornimi radarskimi odzivniki, ki so v skladu z zahtevami iz delov B in C Priloge II, ter utemeljitev za neopremljenost.
State aircraft operating in accordance with Article 2(2) that will be out of operational service by 1 January 2024 at the latest;
v primeru državnih zrakoplovov, ki opravljajo lete v skladu s členom 2(2), ki bodo najpozneje do 1. januarja 2024 prenehali obratovati;
procurement constraints.’;
v primeru omejitev pri naročanju.“;
in paragraph 1, ‘8 June 2016’ is replaced by ‘7 June 2020’;
v odstavku 1 se datum „8. junijem 2016“ nadomesti z datumom „7. junijem 2020“;
in paragraph 3, ‘1 July 2017’ is replaced by ‘1 January 2019’;
v odstavku 3 se datum „1. julija 2017“ nadomesti z datumom „1. januarja 2019“;
the title of Part A is replaced by the following:
naslov dela A se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Part A: Secondary surveillance radar transponder capabilities referred to in Article 4(3), point (a) of Article 5(5), Article 7(2) and Article 8(1) and (3)’;
„Del A: Zmogljivosti sekundarnega nadzornega radarskega odzivnika iz člena 4(3), točke (a) člena 5(5), člena 7(2) ter člena 8(1) in (3)“;
the title of Part B is replaced by the following:
naslov dela B se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Part B: Secondary surveillance radar transponder capabilities referred to in Article 4(3), point (b) of Article 5(5), Article 5(7), Article 7(2) and Article 8(2) and (3)’;
„Del B: Zmogljivosti sekundarnega nadzornega radarskega odzivnika iz člena 4(3), točke (b) člena 5(5), člena 5(7), člena 7(2) ter člena 8(2) in (3)“;
the title of Part C is replaced by the following:
naslov dela C se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Part C: Secondary surveillance radar transponder additional surveillance data capability referred to in Article 4(3), point (c) of Article 5(5), Article 7(2), Article 8(2) and (3) and Article 14(1)’.
„Del C: Zmogljivost sekundarnega nadzornega radarskega odzivnika za dodatne nadzorne podatke iz člena 4(3), točke (c) člena 5(5), člena 7(2), člena 8(2) in (3) ter člena 14(1)“.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 of 22 November 2011 laying down requirements for the performance and the interoperability of surveillance for the single European sky (OJ L 305, 23.11.2011, p. 35).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1207/2011 z dne 22. novembra 2011 o določitvi zahtev glede učinkovitosti in interoperabilnosti nadzora za enotno evropsko nebo (UL L 305, 23.11.2011, str. 35).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/387
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/387
supplementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the parameters for the calculation of cash penalties for settlement fails and the operations of CSDs in host Member States
o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 909/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi s parametri za izračun denarnih kazni za neuspešne poravnave in dejavnostmi CDD v državah članicah gostiteljicah
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 [1], and in particular Article 7(14) and Article 24(7) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 909/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. julija 2014 o izboljšanju ureditve poravnav vrednostnih papirjev v Evropski uniji in o centralnih depotnih družbah ter o spremembi direktiv 98/26/ES in 2014/65/EU ter Uredbe (EU) št. 236/2012 [1] ter zlasti člena 7(14) in člena 24(7) Uredbe,
The provisions of this Regulation are closely linked since they deal with the elements required for the implementation of the measures laid down in Regulation (EU) No 909/2014.
Določbe te uredbe so tesno povezane, ker obravnavajo elemente, ki so potrebni za izvajanje ukrepov iz Uredbe (EU) št. 909/2014.
To ensure coherence between those measures and to facilitate a comprehensive view and easy access by persons that are subject to these provisions, it is desirable to include all these elements concerning measures under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 in a single Regulation.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti med temi ukrepi in za olajšanje celovitega pregleda ter enostavnega dostopa osebam, za katere te določbe veljajo, je zaželeno vse elemente, ki zadevajo ukrepe iz Uredbe (EU) št. 909/2014, združiti v eno samo uredbo.
Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 requires that central securities depositories (CSDs) impose cash penalties on participants to their securities settlement systems that cause settlement fails (failing participants).
Uredba (EU) št. 909/2014 zahteva, da centralne depotne družbe (CDD) naložijo denarne kazni udeležencem v njihovih sistemih poravnave vrednostnih papirjev, ki povzročijo neuspešne poravnave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: udeleženci, ki ne izpolnjujejo obveznosti).
To ensure that cash penalties imposed on failing participants act as an effective deterrent, the parameters for the calculation of the level of cash penalties should be closely related to the value of financial instruments that fail to be delivered, and to which appropriate penalty rates should be applied.
Za zagotovitev, da so denarne kazni, naložene udeležencem, ki ne izpolnjujejo obveznosti, učinkovito odvračilne, bi morali biti parametri za izračun ravni denarnih kazni tesno povezani z vrednostjo finančnih instrumentov, ki niso bili izročeni, na katero bi se morale obračunati ustrezne stopnje kazni.
The value of the financial instruments underlying the transaction should also be the basis for the calculation of the level of cash penalty where the settlement fail is due to a lack of cash.
Vrednost finančnih instrumentov, ki so osnova za transakcijo, bi morala prav tako biti osnova za izračun stopnje denarne kazni, kadar je poravnava neuspešna zaradi pomanjkanja denarnih sredstev.
The level of cash penalties should provide incentives to failing participants to promptly settle transactions that failed to be settled.
Višina denarne kazni bi morala zagotoviti spodbudo za udeležence, ki ne izpolnjujejo obveznosti, da nemudoma poravnajo posle, ki niso bili poravnani.
In order to ensure the effective achievement of the objectives pursued by the imposition of cash penalties, the adequacy of the parameters for their calculation should be monitored on an ongoing basis and adjusted, as necessary, on the basis of the impact of those penalties on the market.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega doseganja ciljev, za katere se prizadeva z naložitvijo denarnih kazni, bi bilo treba redno spremljati ustreznost parametrov za izračun teh kazni ter jih po potrebi prilagajati glede na učinek kazni na trg.
In view of the considerable price differences of financial instruments in the multiple underlying transactions and in order to facilitate the calculation of cash penalties, the value of financial instruments should be based on a single reference price.
Glede na precejšnje razlike v ceni finančnih instrumentov v poslih z več osnovnimi instrumenti in za olajšanje izračuna denarnih kazni, bi morala vrednost finančnih instrumentov temeljiti na enotni referenčni ceni.
The same reference price should be used by CSDs on a given day for calculating cash penalties for settlement fails concerning identical financial instruments.
CDD bi morale na dani datum uporabiti isto referenčno ceno za izračun denarnih kazni za neuspešne poravnave poslov z enakimi finančnimi instrumenti.
Cash penalties should be therefore the result of multiplying the number of financial instruments underlying the transaction that failed to settle by the relevant reference price.
Denarne kazni bi zato morale biti rezultat pomnožitve števila finančnih instrumentov, ki so osnova posla, ki ni bil poravnan, z zadevno referenčno ceno.
The establishment of reference prices should be based on objective and reliable data and methodologies.
Referenčne cene bi se morale določati na podlagi objektivnih in zanesljivih podatkov ter metodologij.
Taking into account that the automation of calculations of cash penalties should ensure their effective application by CSDs, appropriate penalty rates should be based on a single table of values that should be easy to automate and apply.
Glede na to da bi morala avtomatizacija izračuna denarnih kazni zagotoviti, da jih CDD učinkovito uporabljajo, bi morale ustrezne stopnje kazni temeljiti na enotni razpredelnici vrednosti, ki bi jih moralo biti enostavno avtomatizirati in uporabiti.
Penalty rates for different types of financial instruments should be set at levels that would result in cash penalties that fulfil the conditions of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014.
Stopnje kazni za različne vrste finančnih instrumentov bi morale biti določene na ravneh, ki bi omogočili denarne kazni, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje Uredbe (EU) št. 909/2014.
Settlement of transactions in shares is usually highly standardised.
Poravnava poslov z delnicami je navadno visoko standardizirana.