natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Secondly, the Commission noted that this does not address the issue of the Indian exporting producers being able to produce the product they export to the Union, but merely discloses the sales policy of those two Chinese exporting producers.
Dejansko je indijski izvoz v Unijo ostal znaten, kar je privedlo do spremembe vzorca trgovanja, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 36 in 37.
The Commission therefore rejected this claim.
Kar zadeva privlačnost trga Unije, se Komisija sklicuje na analizo, ki je bila izvedena med prvotno preiskavo.
The applicant claimed that there is no piercing mill in India capable of producing hot pierced tubes with a diameter over 4 inches and noted that this was not analysed by the Commission.
Vložnik je prav tako trdil, da je v nasprotju z ugotovitvijo Komisije, da se je večji del povečanja indijskega uvoza iz LRK zgodil pred uvedbo ukrepov, povečanje indijskega uvoza iz LRK sovpadalo z začetkom preiskave.
The Commission noted that the SSSPT exported by the Indian exporting producers to the Union can be produced from hot formed pipes originating in both India and the PRC.
To vsekakor ne spremeni sklepa Komisije, da je povečanje indijskega uvoza iz Kitajske nastalo precej pred uvedbo ukrepov, niti sklepa iz uvodnih izjav 37 in 38, da je prišlo do spremembe vzorca trgovanja, glede česar se Komisija strinja z vložnikom.
The equipment available to the Indian exporting producers allows them to cold process Chinese hot formed pipes with a diameter above 4 inches.
Vložnik je tudi trdil, da se je delež indijskega izvoza v Unijo v primerjavi z indijskim uvozom iz LRK povečal v obdobju preiskave.
Therefore this claim was rejected.
Za ugotovitev, ali se je poslovni model indijskih proizvajalcev spremenil, je bilo treba analizirati njihovo poslovanje kot celoto, ne pa se omejiti na analizo njihove prodaje v Unijo.
The applicant put into question the Commission's conclusion concerning the substantial transformation in recital 33 above, where the Commission described that the cold forming causes irreversible alterations of the product's essential characteristics and claimed that the cost of transformation is not substantial.
Za analizo tega je Komisija uporabila primerjavo indijskega uvoza iz LRK s celotno indijsko prodajo sodelujočih indijskih družb.
The Commission first noted that the applicant did not contest that during the cold forming process the product changes its dimensions and its physical, mechanical and metallurgical properties.
Zato je to trditev zavrnila.
In its assessment, the Commission noted that the finding of non-circumvention under Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation was based in this case on the existence of a sufficient due cause and economic justification for the processing activities carried out in India.
Vložnik je tudi trdil, da hladno vlečenje ni postopek, ki bi zahteval znatne naložbe v osnovna sredstva, in ga je zanimalo, ali je Komisija preverila izkoriščenost zmogljivosti pred začetkom obdobja preiskave do obdobja poročanja.
Therefore, it was not necessary to make a quantitative assessment of the costs of transformation.
Komisija je res preverila izkoriščenost zmogljivosti sodelujočih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in ugotovila, da je proizvodna zmogljivost na splošno presegala dejanski obseg proizvodnje v obdobju preiskave.
The applicant pointed out that the Commission did not consider that the bulk of the Union imports from India prior to the imposition of the measures against the PRC were made by a subsidiary of one Union producer and proposed that the Commission adapt Table 1 by deducting those imports, which would result in a steeper increase of the imports from India after the imposition of the measures.
To potrjuje ugotovitev, da je bila večina družb opremljena s potrebnimi osnovnimi sredstvi že pred začetkom prvotne preiskave, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (49).
The applicant also claimed that if the Commission would exclude those exports, then the Union could not be considered an important export market for Indian exporting producers before the initiation of the original investigation.
Poleg tega je Komisija ugotovila, da so bili vsi preverjeni proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so v obdobju poročanja izvažali v Unijo, opremljeni z valjčnimi stroji vrste pilger in so jih uporabljali.
Even if the exports to the Union of the aforementioned subsidiary of the Union producer in India, which were relatively stable over the investigation period were excluded, this would not change the assessment of the increase of Indian exports to the Union.
Zato je Komisija zavrnila trditev in vztraja pri ugotovitvi glede zahteve po znatnih naložbah iz uvodne izjave (49).
Indeed, the Indian exports to the Union remained significant, resulting in the change in the pattern of trade explained in recitals 36 and 37 above.
Vložnik je v svojih pripombah k ugotovitvam iz uvodne izjave 50 primerjal podatke Eurostata in ugotovil, da je bila povprečna indijska cena uvoza iz Indije višja od cene izvoza iz LRK do leta 2014.
As regards the attractiveness of the Union market, the Commission refers to the analysis that took place during the original investigation.
V uvodni izjavi 50 je Komisija primerjala povprečne cene iz leta 2009 na podlagi statističnih podatkov, objavljenih v preglednicah 4 in 17 Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 627/2011 [4], kar je prikazalo nižjo ceno za Indijo.
The original investigation was initiated on 30 September 2010.
Zato je bila ta trditev prav tako zavrnjena.
Since SSSPT are typically made to order and not sold from stock, and taking into account the time to ship goods from the PRC to India by ocean freight, it is unlikely that the increase in the Chinese exports to India in 2009 and 2010 occurred after the date of initiation.
ZAKLJUČEK PREISKAVE
The applicant also argued that the ratio of Indian exports to the Union versus Indian imports from the PRC increased during the investigation period.
Preiskava je pokazala, da hladna obdelava pomeni znatno preoblikovanje izdelka ter da razen izogibanja plačilu dajatve obstajata zadostni vzrok in gospodarska upravičenost za spremembo vzorca trgovanja med LRK, Indijo in Unijo.
Referring to the information in Table 2 above, indeed this ratio (D/B) increased from 54 % to 95 %.
Pogoji iz člena 13(1) za ugotovitev izogibanja torej niso izpolnjeni in veljavni ukrepi za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK se ne bi smeli razširiti na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega prek Indije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Indije ali ne.
However, contrary to the allegation of the applicant, this does not show a change in the business model of the Indian producers, but only shows the increasing importance of the Union market for the Indian producers.
Registracijo uvoza izdelka v preiskavi, poslanega iz Indije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Indije ali ne, kakor je bila uvedena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2017/272, bi bilo treba ustaviti.
To establish whether the business model of the Indian producers has changed, it was necessary to analyse their operations as a whole, rather than limiting the analysis to their sales to the Union.
Odbor, ustanovljen s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036, ni predložil mnenja –
To analyse this, the Commission used the comparison of Indian imports from the PRC on the total Indian sales of the cooperating Indian companies.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Therefore, the Commission rejected this claim.
Člen 1
The applicant also claimed that cold drawing is not a process requiring significant investments in fixed assets and asked the Commission whether it has checked the capacity utilization before the start of the investigation period up to the reporting period.
Preiskava, ki se je začela z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2017/272 in zadeva možno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1331/2011 na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex73041100, ex73042200, ex73042400, ex73044100, ex73044910, ex73044993, ex73044995, ex73044999 in ex73049000 (oznake TARIC: 7304110011, 7304110019, 7304220021, 7304220029, 7304240021, 7304240029, 7304410091, 7304491091, 7304499391, 7304499591, 7304499991 in 7304900091), z uvozom, poslanim iz Indije, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirane kot izdelki s poreklom iz Indije ali ne, in registracija takega uvoza se zaključita.
The Commission indeed verified the capacity utilisation of the cooperating Indian exporting producers, finding that the production capacity generally exceeded the actual production output throughout the investigation period.
Člen 2
This supports the finding that the majority of the companies were equipped by the necessary fixed assets already before the initiation of the original investigation, as stated in recital 49 above.
Carinskim organom se odredi, da ustavijo registracijo uvoza, ki je bila določena v skladu s členom 2 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/272.
Furthermore, the Commission found that all verified exporting producers that exported to the Union in the reporting period were equipped by and were using pilger mills.
Člen 3
Therefore, the Commission rejected the claim and maintained its finding concerning the requirement of significant investments stated in recital 49 above.
Izvedbena uredba (EU) 2017/272 se razveljavi.
In its comments concerning the findings set out in recital 50, the applicant compared the Eurostat data and discovered that the average Indian price of imports from India was higher than the price of exports from the PRC up to the year 2014.
Člen 4
In recital 50 the Commission made a comparison of average prices in 2009 based on the statistics published in Tables 4 and 17 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 627/2011 [4], which showed a lower price for India.
Ta uredba začne veljati na dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
In any case, the applicant does not dispute that the Indian imports became the cheapest source of imports on the Union market after the imposition of the anti-dumping duty against the PRC.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
Consequently, this claim was also rejected.
V Bruslju, 15. novembra 2017
TERMINATION OF THE INVESTIGATION
Za Komisijo
In view of the above findings, the current anti-circumvention investigation should be terminated.
Predsednik
The investigation showed that the cold processing represents a substantial transformation of the product and that there is due cause and economic justification other than the avoidance of the duty for any change in the pattern of trade between the PRC, India and the Union.
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
The conditions laid down in Article 13(1) to consider that circumvention is taking place are therefore not fulfilled and the measures in force on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC should not be extended to imports of the same product consigned via India, whether declared as originating in India or not.
UL L 336, 20.12.2011, str. 6.
The registration of the imports of the product under investigation consigned from India, whether declared as originating in India or not, as introduced by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/272 should be discontinued.
UL L 40, 17.2.2017, str. 64.
The Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 did not deliver an opinion,
UL L 169, 29.6.2011, str. 1.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Prvotna preiskava se je začela 30. septembra 2010.
Article 1
Ker so brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla običajno narejene po naročilu in se ne prodajajo iz zalog ter ob upoštevanju časa, potrebnega za čezmorski prevoz blaga iz LRK v Indijo, ni verjetno, da se je povečanje kitajskega izvoza v Indijo v letih 2009 in 2010 zgodilo po datumu začetka.
The investigation initiated by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/272 concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2011 on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel, currently falling within CN codes ex73041100, ex73042200, ex73042400, ex73044100, ex73044910, ex73044993, ex73044995, ex73044999 and ex73049000 (TARIC codes: 7304110011, 7304110019, 7304220021, 7304220029, 7304240021, 7304240029, 7304410091, 7304491091, 7304499391, 7304499591, 7304499991 and 7304900091) originating in the People's Republic of China by imports consigned from India, whether declared as originating in India or not, and making such imports subject to registration is terminated.
Glede na informacije v preglednici 2 se je ta delež (D / B) res povečal s 54 % na 95 %.
Article 2
Vendar v nasprotju s trditvijo vložnika to ne kaže spremembe poslovnega modela indijskih proizvajalcev, ampak kaže samo vse večji pomen trga Unije za indijske proizvajalce.
Regulation (EU) 2017/2094 of the European Central Bank
Uredba Evropske centralne banke (EU) 2017/2094
of 3 November 2017
z dne 3. novembra 2017
amending Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 on oversight requirements for systemically important payment systems (ECB/2017/32)
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 o pregledniških zahtevah za sistemsko pomembne plačilne sisteme (ECB/2017/32)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 127(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 127(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 3.1, Article 22 and the first indent of Article 34.1 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke ter zlasti člena 3.1, člena 22 in prve alinee člena 34.1 Statuta, ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI), the successor of the CPSS, and IOSCO subsequently published guidance on these principles.
Svet ECB je v skladu s členom 24 Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) pregledal splošno uporabo navedene uredbe.
The European Central Bank (ECB) has decided to implement the CPMI-IOSCO principles and subsequent guidance insofar as they apply to systemically important payment systems (SIPS) by means of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2014/28) [2].
Pri tem pregledu je upošteval ugotovitve prve celovite ocene SPPS.
The Governing Council has reviewed the general application of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28), pursuant to Article 24 thereof.
Pri oceni je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba nekatere elemente izboljšati ali pojasniti, v nekaj primerih pa so potrebne večje spremembe, s katerimi bi se zagotovila uporaba najvišjih standardov za pregled.
That review took account of the findings of the first comprehensive assessment of SIPS.
Plačilne institucije in institucije za izdajo elektronskega denarja, ki imajo dostop do SPPS prek neposrednih udeležencev v skladu s členom 35(2) Direktive (EU) 2015/2366 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], bi bilo treba za potrebe te uredbe obravnavati kot posredne udeležence.
The assessment found that certain matters required improvement or clarification and, in a few cases, a need for more substantial amendments seeking to ensure the application of the highest oversight standards.
Da se zagotovi učinkovito obvladovanje tveganj, je pomembno ohranjati jasno ločitev funkcij poslovanja, upravljanja tveganj in notranje revizije, tudi tako, da se za opravljanje teh funkcij pooblastijo različne osebe.
For the purposes of this Regulation, payment institutions and e-money institutions that have access to SIPS via direct participants, pursuant to Article 35(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], should be treated as indirect participants.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pri upravljavcih SPPS, ki niso SPPS Eurosistema, ob upoštevanju nacionalnega prava zagotoviti, da ima odbor neodvisnega člana, da se izboljša učinkovitost odbora.
To ensure effective risk mitigation, it is important to maintain a clear separation between operational, risk management and internal audit functions, including through mandating the carrying out of these functions by different persons.
Ker ima Eurosistem cilje javne politike, odgovornosti in institucionalno ureditev, ki so določeni v Pogodbi in Statutu Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke, bi bilo treba upravljavce SPPS Eurosistema izvzeti iz te zahteve.
Furthermore, for non-Eurosystem SIPS operators, it should be ensured, subject to national law, that there is an independent member on their Board to enhance its effectiveness.
Poleg tega je Svet ECB ugotovil potrebo po večji jasnosti glede odgovornosti odbora upravljavca SPPS, ki vključujejo odobritev odločitev, ki znatno vplivajo na profil tveganosti SPPS ali upravljavca SPPS, in ključnih dokumentov o tveganjih, ki urejajo delovanje SPPS.
As the Eurosystem has public policy objectives and responsibilities and an institutional set-up defined in the Treaty and the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, Eurosystem SIPS operators should be granted an exemption from this requirement.
Svet ECB se je na splošno strinjal, da je treba bistveno izboljšati obvladovanje likvidnostnega tveganja, ki nastaja v sistemih za odloženo neto poravnavo, in sicer z zagotavljanjem učinkovitega obvladovanja likvidnostnega tveganja za vse cikle od trenutka, ko se nalog za prenos uvrsti v izračun neto pozicij za poravnavo in je pozicija vidna udeležencu.
Furthermore, the Governing Council identified a need to provide further clarity on the responsibilities of a SIPS operator's Board which include the approval of decisions that have a significant impact on the risk profile of a SIPS or SIPS operator and of the key risk documents governing the operation of the SIPS.
Da se omogoči nemoteno delovanje SPPS, morajo imeti udeleženci ustrezna orodja za učinkovito upravljanje likvidnosti.
The Governing Council generally agreed that there is a need to substantially improve the mitigation of liquidity risk generated in deferred net settlement (DNS) systems through ensuring effective liquidity risk mitigation for all cycles from the moment a transfer order has been included in the calculation of net settlement positions and the position is visible to the participant.
Upravljavec SPPS mora spremljati in olajševati nemoten tok likvidnosti na ravni sistema ob upoštevanju likvidnostne izpostavljenosti vsakega udeleženca.
To allow for the smooth functioning of a SIPS, participants need to have adequate tools to effectively manage their liquidity.
Upravljavec SPPS, ki opravlja poravnavo enostranskih plačil v eurih, mora zagotoviti, da se dokončna poravnava izvrši v centralnobančnem denarju.
The SIPS operator has to monitor and facilitate the smooth flow of liquidity at a system level, taking into account the liquidity exposure of each participant.
Ker ta zahteva velja tudi takrat, ko v SPPS, ki ponuja poravnavo v centralnobančnem denarju, veljajo izredne razmere, bi si morali upravljavci SPPS, ki poravnavajo plačila za druge SPPS, prizadevati, da bi omogočili dokončno poravnavo tudi v takih razmerah.
A SIPS operator settling one-sided payments in euro has to ensure that final settlement takes place in central bank money.
Da se zagotovi zaščita sredstev SPPS pred morebitno poslovno izgubo, bi bilo treba sredstva, ki jih ima upravljavec SPPS za kritje splošnega poslovnega tveganja, ločiti od sredstev, ki jih ima za redno poslovanje.
Because this requirement also applies where a SIPS offering settlement in central bank money is in an emergency situation, SIPS operators settling payments for other SIPS should endeavour to allow final settlement even in such a situation.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba razlikovati med načrtom za sanacijo in urejeno prenehanje SPPS ter kapitalskim načrtom SPPS.
To ensure that SIPS funds are protected against possible business losses, the assets held by a SIPS operator to cover general business risk should be segregated from the assets held for daily business operations.
Kapitalski načrt SPPS mora prikazati možnost zbiranja kapitala, načrt za sanacijo in urejeno prenehanje SPPS pa bi moral zagotoviti, da se ob normalnem poslovanju obseg sredstev, ki so na voljo za načrt za sanacijo in urejeno prenehanje, ne zmanjša pod znesek, ki je potreben za njuno izvedbo.
In addition, a distinction should be drawn between a SIPS recovery and orderly wind-down plan, on the one hand, and a SIPS capital plan, on the other.
Zagotavljanje učinkovitega upravljanja operativnega tveganja je trajen proces, ki zahteva, da se operativne politike in postopki redno in po potrebi preizkušajo in pregledujejo, zlasti po večjih spremembah sistema.
While the latter needs to reflect the possibility of raising capital, the former should ensure that, within the normal course of business, funds available for the recovery and orderly wind-down plan do not fall below the amount required to implement them.
To še posebej velja za upravljanje kibernetskega tveganja, katerega pomembnost se je od objave Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) povečala.
Ensuring effective operational risk management is a continuous process which requires that operational policies and procedures are periodically, and whenever necessary, tested and reviewed, especially following significant changes to the system.
Ta uredba določa posebne zahteve, ki so pomembne za obvladovanje kibernetskega tveganja.
This is particularly true for the management of cyber risks which has grown in importance since the publication of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28).
Da bi lahko pristojni organ učinkovito izvajal pooblastila za pregled, bi bilo treba ta pooblastila dopolniti z dvema dodatnima instrumentoma.
This Regulation sets out specific requirements that are important in order to mitigate cyber risks.
Prvič, pristojni organ bi moral biti pooblaščen, da od upravljavca SPPS zahteva imenovanje neodvisnega strokovnjaka, ki opravi preiskavo ali neodvisen pregled delovanja SPPS.
In order for a competent authority to exercise its oversight powers effectively, these powers should be complemented with two additional tools.
Poleg tega bi moral imeti možnost določiti zahteve glede vrste strokovnjaka, ki ga je treba imenovati, vsebine in obsega poročila, ki ga je treba pripraviti, ravnanja s poročilom, vključno z razkritjem in objavo, ter rokov za pripravo poročila.
First, the competent authority should have the power to require a SIPS operator to appoint an independent expert to perform an investigation or independent review of the SIPS's operation.
Drugič, v skladu z odgovornostjo B zgoraj navedenih načel za infrastrukture finančnega trga bi moral imeti pristojni organ možnost opravljati inšpekcijske preglede na kraju samem ali prenesti pooblastilo za opravljanje te naloge.
In addition, it should be able to impose requirements concerning the type of expert to be appointed, the content and scope of the report to be produced, the treatment of the report, including disclosure and publication, and timing for the production of the report.
Korektivni ukrepi se lahko naložijo samo v primeru kršitev Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28), vendar bi bilo v nekaterih primerih lahko upravičeno, da se postopek za naložitev takih ukrepov začne na podlagi domnevne neskladnosti ter pri tem da upravljavcu SPPS možnost, da se izjavi in da pojasnila, preden se ugotovi kršitev.
Second, in line with Responsibility B of the abovementioned Principles for financial market infrastructures, a competent authority should be able to conduct on-site inspections or delegate this task.
Postopek za naložitev korektivnih ukrepov bi bilo treba določiti v sklepu.
While corrective measures may only be imposed for infringements of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28), there could be situations that merit initiating the procedure for the imposition of such measures on the grounds of suspected non-compliance, giving a SIPS operator the opportunity to be heard and to provide explanations before an infringement is established.
Pristojni organ, ki ni ECB, bi moral o tem, da namerava naložiti korektivne ukrepe, brez odlašanja obvestiti ECB.