natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is expected that the imposition of anti-dumping duties will restore fair trade conditions on the Union market, allowing the Union industry to align its prices of the like product to the costs of production.
Uporabniki zadevnega izdelka se niso odločili za sodelovanje.
It can also be expected that the imposition of measures will enable the Union industry to regain at least part of the market share lost during the period considered, with a positive impact on its profitability and overall financial situation.
Od osmih znanih uporabnikov, s katerimi je Komisija stopila v stik ob začetku postopka, je interes za sodelovanje pokazala le ena družba.
The imposition of measures would enable the industry to maintain and further develop its efforts to be cost efficient.
Vendar pa celo ta družba Komisiji ni vrnila izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
Should measures not be imposed, further losses in market share could be expected and the Union industry's profitability would deteriorate.
Od uvoznikov je Komisiji izpolnjen vprašalnik za izbor vzorca iz obvestila o začetku vrnilo šest družb.
It is, therefore, provisionally concluded that the imposition of anti-dumping measures on imports originating in Belarus would be in the interest of the Union industry.
Tri od teh družb, ki predstavljajo 81 % obsega uvoza zadevnega izdelka, ki so ga sporočili sodelujoči, so bile nato izbrane v vzorec.
Interest of users and importers
Le dva od treh vzorčenih uvoznikov sta Komisiji vrnila izpolnjen vprašalnik.
Cooperation of the users of the product concerned was low.
Eden od njiju je navedel, da ni samo uvoznik zadevnega izdelka, ampak je dejansko uporabnik in bi ga bilo treba v postopku obravnavati kot takega.
Out of eight known users contacted upon the initiation of the procedure only one company was interested in cooperating.
Uvoznik je zadevni izdelek začel nabavljati v OP in je z nizko stopnjo dobička 78 % izdelkov uvozil iz Belorusije.
However, even this company failed to reply to the user questionnaire send by the Commission.
To ponazarja, da je ta uvoznik izkoristil nizke cene uvoza iz Belorusije in ustvaril nov krog strank.
In the case of importers there were six companies which replied to the sampling questionnaire included in the Notice of Initiation.
Dejanj tega uvoznika torej ni mogoče obravnavati, kot da so pomenila odziv na uveljavljene trgovinske tokove.
Three of these companies, representing 81 % of the volume of imports of the product concerned reported by the respondents, were subsequently chosen to the sample.
Ko se bodo razmere na trgu zaradi uvedbe ukrepov spremenile, bo ta uvoznik iskal druge trgovinske priložnosti.
Only two out of three sampled importers replied to the questionnaires sent by the Commission.
Uporabnik je pri prodaji končnih izdelkov, ki so vsebovali armaturne palice, ustvaril izgube.
One of them indicated that the company in question is not just an importer of the product concerned but actually a user and should be treated as such in the procedure.
Približno polovico armaturnih palic je kupil od industrije Unije, tretjino iz Belorusije, preostanek pa iz tretjih držav, kot sta Kitajska in Turčija.
The importer started to procure the product concerned during the IP of which 78 % was imported from Belarus and it did so with a small profit margin.
Ta uporabnik je torej nabavljal tam, kjer so bile cena, razpoložljivost in kakovost najugodnejše.
That illustrates that this importer banked on the opportunity of low import prices from Belarus and created a new customer base.
Načrtovani ukrepi bodo morda vplivali na delež nabave iz Belorusije in bodo nekoliko omejili ali spremenili izbor nabavljenih armaturnih palic, vendar se zdi, da to na tega uporabnika ne bo bistveno vplivalo.
The actions of this importer can therefore not be considered as responding to established trade flows.
Vzrok za izgube se zdi strukturne narave in nepovezan s pridobivanjem surovine iz Belorusije.
It will therefore look for other trade opportunities when the market situation changes after the imposition of measures.
Obe družbi pa sta kljub očitno različnima vlogama v postopku opozorili na enake argumente proti uvedbi ukrepov: (a) proizvajalci Unije nimajo zadostnih zmogljivosti, da bi lahko zadostili povpraševanju na trgu Unije; (b) proizvajalci Unije ne proizvajajo dovolj raznovrstnih izdelkov in (c) težave pri zamenjavi dobaviteljev, saj naj bi za zadevni izdelek različne države članice zahtevale različna potrdila o homologaciji.
The user made losses on the sales of downstream finished products containing rebars.
Začasne ugotovitve ne podpirajo prve trditve – izkoriščenost zmogljivosti industrije Unije je 67-odstotna, kar pomeni, da bi bilo s prosto zmogljivostjo mogoče proizvesti več, kot se iz Belorusije uvozi v Unijo.
The latter were procured circa half from the Union industry, a third from Belarus and the rest from third countries such as China and Turkey.
Druga trditev ni bila ustrezno podkrepljena z dokazi.
This user therefore sources where appropriate in terms of price, availability and quality.
Po drugi strani pa iz vprašalnikov, ki so jih izpolnili vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, jasno izhaja, da proizvajalci Unije proizvajajo in prodajajo vse vrste izdelka.
The proportion of purchases from Belarus may be affected by the intended measures and somewhat limiting or altering the choice of procured rebars, but does not seem to affect this user fundamentally.
V zvezi s tretjo trditvijo je treba poudariti, da proizvajalci Unije že zdaj dobavljajo različnim državam članicam brez kakršnih koli očitnih težav.
The cause of the losses seems structural and unrelated to the raw material sourcing from Belarus.
Še en sodelujoči, a ne vzorčeni uvoznik je v ločeni pripombi izpostavil vprašanje kartelnega dogovora, ki naj bi obstajal med proizvajalci Unije.
Both companies, despite their apparently different role in the procedure, raised nevertheless the same point against the imposition of the measures: (a) insufficient capacity of the Union producers to satisfy the demand of the Union market; (b) insufficient range of products produced by the Union producers; and (c) difficulties in switching between suppliers as allegedly different Member States require different homologation certificates for the product concerned.
Vendar pa ni predložil dokazov, ki bi podkrepili to trditev.
The first claim is not supported by the provisional findings — capacity utilisation of the Union industry is at the level of 67 % which leaves much more free capacity than the whole imports of Belarus to the Union.
Vprašanje domnevnega kartelnega dogovora je pozneje izpostavil beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik.
The second claim was not substantiated.
Komisija ocenjuje informacije, ki jih je posredoval beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik.
On the other hand questionnaire replies of the sampled Union producers show clearly that they are producing and selling the full range of product types.
Ker pa so bile te informacije predložene zelo pozno v postopku, tega vprašanja v tej fazi ni mogoče obravnavati in o njem sprejeti sklepa.
With regard to the third claim, it should be stressed that Union producers are already supplying various Member States without any apparent difficulty.
Vsekakor se opozarja, da se informacije, ki jih je predložila družba, očitno navezujejo na obtožbe, ki bi se lahko nanašale le na eno družbo, ki je vključena v vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
One other cooperating, not sampled, importer raised in his separate submission the issue of the cartel allegedly existing among the Union producers.
Poleg tega pa zadevni postopek preverjanja, ki ga je začel italijanski organ za konkurenco, še ni zaključen [9].
However, the company did not provide any documents supporting this claim.
Komisija bo to trditev podrobneje preiskala v zaključni fazi preiskave.
The issue of alleged cartel agreement was subsequently raised by the Belarusian exporting producer.
Ob koncu začasne faze preiskave je še en uporabnik, ki se Komisiji ni javil v zgodnejši fazi postopka, predložil izpolnjen vprašalnik za uporabnike.
The Commission is assessing the information provided by the Belarusian exporting producer.
Izpolnjeni vprašalnik je predložil zelo pozno v začasni fazi postopka preiskave, zato ga v tej fazi ni bilo mogoče analizirati in obravnavati.
However, as this came very late in the procedure, this point cannot be addressed and concluded at this stage.
Komisija ga bo podrobno preučila in analizirala v zaključni fazi preiskave.
In any event, it is noted that information provided by the company seems to relate to accusations potentially involving only one company which is included in the sample of the Union producers.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega Komisija trenutno zavzema stališče, da je splošni učinek na uporabnike in uvoznike omejen, enako pa velja za morebitno omejevanje konkurence.
Furthermore, the verification procedure in question initiated by the Italian Competition Authority is not yet concluded [9].
Sklep o interesu Unije
The Commission will investigate this claim in more details at the definitive stage of the investigation.
Glede na navedeno se začasno sklene, da na podlagi informacij v zvezi z interesom Unije na splošno ni utemeljenih razlogov proti uvedbi ukrepov za uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Belorusije.
Finally, one other user, who did not make himself known to the Commission at an earlier stage of the procedure, submitted a user questionnaire reply at the end of the provisional stage of the investigation.
Morebitni negativni učinki na nepovezane uporabnike in uvoznike se omilijo zaradi razpoložljivosti alternativnih virov nabave.
The submission came very late in the procedure for the provisional stage of the investigation and therefore could not be analysed and addressed at this stage.
Poleg tega se pri presoji splošnega vpliva protidampinških ukrepov na trg Unije zdi, da pozitivni učinki, zlasti na industrijo Unije, prevladajo nad morebitnimi negativnimi učinki na druge interesne skupine.
The Commission will examine and analyse this questionnaire reply in detail at the definitive stage of the investigation.
PREDLOG ZAČASNIH PROTIDAMPINŠKIH UKREPOV
Taken the above into consideration, the Commission takes at this point in time the view that the overall impact on users and importers, and the possible restrictive effects on competition are limited.
Glede na sklepe o dampingu, škodi, vzročni zvezi in interesu Unije je treba uvesti začasne protidampinške ukrepe, da se prepreči, da bi dampinški uvoz še naprej povzročal škodo industriji Unije.
In view of the above, it is provisionally concluded that overall, based on the information concerning the Union interest, there are no compelling reasons against the imposition of measures on imports of the product concerned from Belarus.
Za določitev ravni teh ukrepov so bile upoštevane ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in znesek dajatve, potreben za odpravo škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Any negative effects on the unrelated users and importers are mitigated by the availability of alternative sources of supply.
Pri izračunu dajatve, potrebne za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, se je štelo, da bi moral vsak morebiten ukrep industriji Unije omogočiti, da pokrije svoje proizvodne stroške in ustvari dobiček pred obdavčitvijo, ki bi ga lahko industrija te vrste ustvarila od prodaje podobnega izdelka v Uniji v običajnih konkurenčnih razmerah, tj. brez dampinškega uvoza.
Moreover, when considering the overall impact of the anti-dumping measures on the Union market, the positive effects, in particular on the Union industry, appear to outweigh the potential negative impacts on the other interest groups.
Za določitev ciljnega dobička je Komisija upoštevala dobičke pri nepovezani prodaji, ki se uporabljajo za namene določanja stopnje odprave škode.
PROPOSAL FOR PROVISIONAL ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
V celotnem obravnavanem obdobju je imela industrija Unije dobiček le v letu 2012, a sta na ta minimalni dobiček v višini 1,3 % v navedenem letu vplivala „shema goljufanja na področju DDV“ in poznejše znižanje cen, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 83 in 106 do 111.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, provisional anti-dumping measures should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Union industry by the dumped imports.
Zato se dobiček, dosežen leta 2012, ne more upoštevati kot razumni „ciljni dobiček“, ki bi omogočil finančno okrevanje in spodbudil naložbe.
Injury elimination level
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila ta stopnja dobička v nasprotju s tisto, ki jo je predlagal pritožnik, dosežena leta 2012, to je v obravnavanem obdobju v tej zadevi.
For the purpose of determining the level of these measures, account was taken of the dumping margins found and the amount of duty necessary to eliminate the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Poleg tega sta izdelka zelo podobna in ju delno proizvajajo iste družbe z istimi proizvodnimi linijami.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measure should allow the Union industry to cover its costs of production and obtain a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved by an industry of this type under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports, on sales of the like product in the Union.
Na podlagi tega je bila stopnja odprave škode izračunana s primerjavo tehtane povprečne cene dampinškega uvoza, kakor je bila določena za izračun nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen iz uvodne izjave 68, in neškodljive cene industrije Unije za podobni izdelek.
Within the whole period considered only in 2012 the Union industry was profitable but the minimal profit of 1,3 % achieved in that year was affected by the impact of the ‘VAT fraud scheme’ and subsequent price depression as explained in recitals 83 and 106 to 111.
Začasni ukrepi
Therefore, the profit achieved in 2012 cannot be considered a reasonable ‘target profit’ which would enable financial recovery and encourage investments.
Glede na navedeno se šteje, da bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe uvesti začasne protidampinške dajatve za uvoz armaturnih palic s poreklom iz Belorusije na ravni nižjih stopenj dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
The target profit proposed by the complainant amounted to 9,9 % and was based on the target profit used in the recent antidumping case against the imports of closely related steel product i.e. wire rods.
Na podlagi navedenega so bile začasne stopnje protidampinških dajatev določene s primerjavo stopenj škode in stopenj dampinga.
However, the Commission considers it more appropriate to use the target profit based on the findings of the more recent case concerning high fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars i.e. 4,8 %.
V skladu s tem so predlagane protidampinške dajatve naslednje:
It is noted that this profit margin, unlike the one proposed by the complainant, was achieved in 2012 that is within the period considered in this case.
Stopnja škode
Furthermore, the two products are very similar, are produced partially by the same companies and with the use of the same production lines.
Stopnja dampinga
On this basis, the injury elimination level was calculated as a comparison of the weighted average price of the dumped imports, as established for the price undercutting calculations in recital 68 above, and the non-injurious price of the Union industry for the like product.
Stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average total CIF import price.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj protidampinških dajatev za posamezne družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena subjekta ali ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) bi bilo treba nemudoma nasloviti na Komisijo [10] skupaj z vsemi pomembnimi informacijami, zlasti o kakršni koli spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje, domače prodaje in izvoza, povezanimi na primer z zadevno spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
Provisional measures
Po potrebi se ta uredba ustrezno spremeni s posodobitvijo seznama družb, ki so upravičene do individualnih stopenj dajatev.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, provisional anti-dumping duties should be imposed in respect of imports of rebars originating in Belarus at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Da se zagotovi ustrezno izvrševanje protidampinške dajatve, je treba stopnjo preostale dajatve uporabljati ne le za nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ampak tudi za tiste proizvajalce, ki v OP niso izvažali v Unijo.
On the basis of the above, the provisional anti-dumping duty rates have been established by comparing the injury margins, dumping margins.
KONČNA DOLOČBA
Consequently, the proposed anti-dumping duties are as follows:
Komisija bo v interesu dobrega upravljanja zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj ji v določenem roku predložijo pisne pripombe in/ali zaprosijo za zaslišanje pred Komisijo in/ali pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih.
Injury margin
Ugotovitve v zvezi z uvedbo začasnih dajatev so začasne in jih bo morda treba v zaključni fazi preiskave spremeniti –
Dumping margin
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Provisional anti-dumping duty rate
Člen 1
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [10] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Uvede se začasna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz nekaterih armaturnih palic, izdelanih iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla, kovanih, toplo valjanih, toplo vlečenih ali toplo iztiskanih, brez nadaljnje obdelave, vključno s spiralno zvitimi po valjanju in tistimi, ki vsebujejo zareze, rebra, brazde ali druge deformacije, nastale med procesom valjanja.
If appropriate, the Regulation will accordingly be amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Zadevni izdelek s poreklom iz Belorusije je trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex72141000, ex72142000, ex72143000, ex72149110, ex72149190, 72149910, ex72149971, ex72149979 in ex72149995 (oznake TARIC: 7214100010, 7214200020, 7214300010, 7214911010, 7214919010, 7214991010, 7214997110, 7214997910, 7214999510).
In order to ensure a proper enforcement of the anti-dumping duty, the residual duty level should not only apply to the non-cooperating exporting producers but also to those producers which did not have any exports to the Union during the IP.
Stopnje začasne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve za izdelek iz odstavka 1, ki ga proizvaja spodaj navedena družba, so:
FINAL PROVISION
Stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve (v %)
In the interests of sound administration, the Commission will invite the interested parties to submit written comments and/or to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings within a fixed deadline.
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
The findings concerning the imposition of provisional duties are provisional and may be amended at the definitive stage of the investigation.
BMZ-Open Joint-Stock Company „Byelorussian Steel Works – Management Company of ‚Byelorussian Metallurgical Company‘ Holding“
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Sprostitev izdelka iz odstavka 1 v prosti promet v Uniji je pogojena z varščino, ki je enaka znesku začasne dajatve.
A provisional anti-dumping duty is imposed on imports of certain concrete reinforcement bars and rods, made of iron or non-alloy steel, not further worked than forged, hot-rolled, hot-drawn or hot-extruded, but including those twisted after rolling and also those containing indentations, ribs, grooves or other deformations produced during the rolling process.
Člen 2
The product is originating in Belarus and is currently falling within CN codes ex72141000, ex72142000, ex72143000, ex72149110, ex72149190, ex72149910, ex72149971, ex72149979 and ex72149995 (TARIC codes: 7214100010, 7214200020, 7214300010, 7214911010, 7214919010, 7214991010, 7214997110, 7214997910, 7214999510).
Zainteresirane strani lahko v 25 koledarskih dneh od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe:
The rates of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 and produced by the company listed below shall be as follows:
zahtevajo razkritje poglavitnih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta ta uredba;
Provisional anti-dumping duty rate (%)
Komisiji predložijo pisne pripombe in
BMZ- Open Joint-Stock Company ‘Byelorussian Steel Works — Management Company of “Byelorussian Metallurgical Company” Holding’
Strani iz člena 21(4) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 lahko v 25 koledarskih dneh od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe predložijo pripombe k uporabi začasnih ukrepov.
Within 25 calendar days of the date of entry into force of this Regulation, interested parties may:
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
request disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which this Regulation was adopted;
V Bruslju, 19. decembra 2016
Within 25 calendar days of the date of entry into force of this Regulation, the parties referred to in Article 21(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 may comment on the application of the provisional measures.
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
Article 3
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti (UL L 343, 22.12.2009, str.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
51).
Article 1 shall apply for a period of 6 months.
Obvestilo o začetku protidampinškega postopka za uvoz nekaterih armaturnih palic s poreklom iz Republike Belorusije (UL C 114, 31.3.2016, str. 3).
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
„Preiskava se ne začne na podlagi odstavka 1, če ni na podlagi preučitve stopnje podpore ali nasprotovanja pritožbi, ki so ju izrazili proizvajalci podobnega izdelka v Uniji, ugotovljeno, da je bila pritožba vložena s strani ali v imenu industrije Unije.
Done at Brussels, 19 December 2016.
Za pritožbo se šteje, da jo je vložila industrija Unije ali da je bila vložena v njenem imenu, kadar jo podpirajo tisti proizvajalci Unije, katerih skupna proizvodnja predstavlja več kakor 50 % celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka tistega dela industrije Unije, ki je izrazil bodisi podporo bodisi nasprotovanje pritožbi.
For the Commission
Vendar se preiskava ne začne, kadar proizvajalci Unije, ki izrecno podpirajo pritožbo, predstavljajo manj kakor 25 % celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka, ki ga proizvede industrija Unije.“
The President
Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 8. septembra 2015, zadeva C-511/13 P, Philips Lighting BV proti Svetu Evropske unije, Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics Co., Ltd, GE Hungary Ipari és Kereskedelmi Zrt.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
(GE Hungary Zrt.), Osram GmbH, Evropska komisija.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51).
Protidampinške dajatve veljajo za Belorusijo (115 %), Kitajsko (133 %), Indonezijo (60,4 %), Latvijo (17 %), Mehiko (20–67 %), Moldavijo (232 %), Poljsko (47–52 %) Turčijo (3,64 %) in Ukrajino (42 %).
Notice of Initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain concrete reinforcement bars and rods originating in the Republic of Belarus (OJ C 114, 31.3.2016, p. 3).
Več podrobnosti je na voljo v naslednjih preiskavah:„Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland and Ukraine.