natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover the absence of specific sectorial knowledge or legal knowledge can prevent him to conduct specific on-site checks or to verify the reliability of specific technical data of legal status.
65).
Such specific analysis could be necessary to assess aspects going beyond the industry criteria, in particular additional aspects identified in accordance with GIC 1963 [44], and for the verification of legal compliance.
To zahtevano visoko stopnjo skladnosti bi bilo treba razlagati ob upoštevanju člena 4 Uredbe, v katerem so opredeljeni pogoji za pridobitev registracije EMAS.
It can be concluded from this analysis that ELH includes a coherent system of certification by third party certifier fitting well with the structure and specificities of the system.
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom tega člena organizacijam, ki imajo certificiran sistem okoljskega ravnanja, priznan v skladu s členom 45, ni treba opraviti tistih delov, ki so priznani kot enakovredni Uredbi.
However the requirements concerning the competencies of the ELH verifier do not fully match the corresponding requirements of the EMAS Regulation.
Deli, ki so priznani kot enakovredni, bi morali biti zato sposobni zagotavljati enako funkcijo kot ustrezni deli sistema EMAS za izvajanje sistema EMAS in registracijo v njem.
Based on these elements the Commission considers that the part of ELH 'accreditation or licensing requirements partly matches the corresponding EMAS requirements.
Glej spletišče fundacije ELH http://eco-lighthouse.org/certification-scheme/.
Conclusion
Za angleški prevod meril glej: http://eco-lighthouse.org/statistikk/ (prevedeni so splošna merila in nekaj izbranih sklopov specifičnih meril).
The ELH constitutes a well-structured, modern, and fair scheme, providing third party audited environmental certification to many organisations of different sizes and sectors.
Za norveške različice glej: http://www.miljofyrtarn.no/dette-er-miljøfyrtårn/bransjekriterier/9-miljt/miljt/55-bransjekriterier-gruppert.
It is built around a set of general and specific criteria to be met by the organisation requiring certification.
Ta se ne sme zamenjevati z „okoljsko izjavo“ EMAS, ki je opredeljena v členih 2 in 18 ter delu B Priloge IV k uredbi o sistemu EMAS.
This structuration differs from the EMAS approach which requires a preliminary identification of the significant environmental aspects specific to the organisation as a basis supporting the management system implementation.
V njem je navedeno: Podjetje mora oblikovati okoljsko politiko ter cilje na področju zdravja, okolja in varnosti, ki morajo biti dokumentirani bodisi v sistemu okoljskega ravnanja bodisi v akcijskem načrtu za letno podnebno in okoljsko poročilo Eco-Lighthouse.
Both schemes also address different targets.
[9] Obveznost ohranjanja notranjega nadzora: Notranji nadzor mora uvesti in izvajati oseba, odgovorna za podjetje.
While ELH has a clear focus on SME's EMAS can be implemented by organisation from all size including large industrial organisations.
S tem je mišljeno vodstvo ali lastnik podjetja.
In terms of governance, the ELH foundation operates the scheme and defines its requirements.
Čeprav je treba notranji nadzor izvajati na vseh ravneh podjetja, nosi glavno odgovornost za začetek delovanja sistema in njegovo vzdrževanje najvišje vodstvo podjetja.
The ELH foundation also works as a licensing body in charge of training and approving the certifiers operating in the different municipalities.
Vendar je v tem oddelku pojasnjeno, da je treba notranji nadzor uvesti in izvajati v sodelovanju z zaposlenimi, odborom za delovno okolje, pooblaščenci za varnost in/ali predstavniki zaposlenih, če obstajajo.
The EMAS governance is based on a legislative act (EU Regulation), involves bodies appointed by the authorities and requires a verification by an accredited or licensed verifier.
Pravna podlaga za to merilo so predpisi o sistematičnih dejavnostih na področju zdravja, okolja in varnosti v podjetjih (predpisi o notranjem nadzoru), oddelek 5.7.
As highlighted throughout this document both systems pursue a similar general objective (improvement of environmental performance of organisations) through different methods.
Pravna povezava: https://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/hms/internkontroll/ in za nadaljnja sklicevanja: http://www.hse.gov.uk/.
Requirements are not identical.
Izdajatelju certifikata in organizaciji na splošno.
Some parts of ELH partly match the corresponding EMAS requirements while other are recognised as complying with these requirements.
http://www.miljofyrtarn.no/dokumenter/bransjekrav/844-general-industry-criteria/file in http://www.miljofyrtarn.no/dokumenter/bransjekrav/866-guidance-to-the-general-industry-criteria/file.
Parts of ELH that do not fully comply with EMAS requirements cannot be recognised as equivalent.
Statistični podatki, ki jih je predložila fundacija ELH o hotelih: http://miljofyrtarn.no/dokumenter/bransjekrav/864-industry-criteria-hotel/file. in o trgovinah z živili na drobno: http://miljofyrtarn.no/dokumenter/bransjekrav/863-industry-criteria-retail-grocery-store/file.
However organisations aiming to step-up to EMAS can use the present document to adapt these parts before applying for EMAS registration.
Smernice fundacije Eco-Lighthouse za splošna merila z dne 4. maja 2017 – merilo 1963: Če podjetje meni, da je treba izvesti dodatne ukrepe, zadostuje ločena ocena drugih okoljskih vidikov.
Based on this assessment the Commission recognises:
Podjetje lahko samo izbere, katero metodo želi uporabiti za obravnavanje teh okoljskih vidikov, vendar je lahko metoda vezana na analizo tveganja za zunanje okolje.
the following parts of the Eco-Lighthouse as complying with the corresponding EMAS requirements.
Izdajatelji certifikatov ELH so usposobljeni za ocenjevanje izpolnjevanja dejanskih meril, ne pa za izvedbo posebnega ocenjevanja različnih okoljskih vidikov.
These parts can therefore be considered as equivalent with the corresponding EMAS requirements:
Glej tudi zahtevo 4: skladnost z zakonodajo.
Commitment and engagement of top management;
Poudarjanje teh razlik v metodologijah je zlasti pomembno ob upoštevanju člena 4 Uredbe.
Establishing an environmental policy;
Nadomestitev okoljskega pregleda EMAS z okoljsko izjavo ELH ne bi bila učinkovita v okviru izvajanja sistema EMAS.
the following parts of the Eco-Lighthouse as partly matching the corresponding EMAS requirements:
V skladu z oddelkom A.2 Priloge II k uredbi o sistemu EMAS.
the requirements of Eco-Lighthouse regarding accreditation or licensing for the certification bodies as partly matching the corresponding EMAS requirements.
Splošno merilo 1944: Podjetje mora zagotoviti dostop do posodobljenega pregleda ustreznih zakonov in drugih predpisov na področju zdravja, okolja in varnosti.
Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009
http://www.regelhjelp.no/ in http://www.miljofyrtarn.no/dette-er-milj%C3%B8fyrt%C3%A5rn/bransjekriterier.
Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009
[25] Uredba o sistemu EMAS, oddelek B.2(2) Priloge II.
Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65).
http://www.regelhjelp.no/.
This high level of compliance required should be read in the light of the Article 4 of the Regulation which defines the conditions to obtain an EMAS registration.
[27] Splošno merilo 1950 Podjetje mora vzpostaviti postopke za poročanje o neskladnosti in njeno obravnavanje.
This third paragraph of this article exempts organisations which have a certified environmental management system recognised in accordance with Article 45 to carry out those parts which have been recognised as equivalent to this Regulation.
http://eco-lighthouse.org/statistikk/ – smernice za merila so na koncu dokumenta.
The parts recognised as equivalent should therefore be able to ensure same function than the corresponding EMAS parts in view of an EMAS implementation and registration.
Splošno merilo 1933: Podjetje mora opredeliti druge pomembne okoljske vidike podjetja ter razmisliti o morebitnih potrebnih ukrepih in/ali vključitvi v letno podnebno in okoljsko poročilo in/ali spremljanju z akcijskim načrtom.
See ELH website http://eco-lighthouse.org/certification-scheme/
Skupina za upravljanje zdravja, varnosti in okolja je pravno obvezujoča, če ima organizacija več kot 50 zaposlenih.
For the English translations of criteria: http://eco-lighthouse.org/statistikk/ (general industry criteria plus a selected few specific criteria sets have been translated).
Skupina za sistem ELH ni obvezna, vendar se po sistemu ELH priporoča v organizacijah z več kot določenim številom zaposlenih.
For the Norwegian versions: http://www.miljofyrtarn.no/dette-er-miljøfyrtårn/bransjekriterier/9-miljt/miljt/55-bransjekriterier-gruppert
To je lahko ena in ista skupina, da se zagotovita učinkovita organizacija in vključevanje sistema ELH v obstoječe strukture upravljanja.
This is not to be confused with the EMAS ‘environmental statement’ which is specified in Articles 2 and 18, and in Annex IV, B of the EMAS regulation.
Priročnik o certificiranju po sistemu Eco-Lighthouse iz leta 2016 – 3.2.4 Ustanovitev in imenovanje okoljske/projektne skupine.
Stating: ‘The enterprise must establish an environmental policy and goals for health, environment and safety.
http://miljofyrtarn.no/nyeverktoy in (primer) http://www.miljofyrtarn.no/2015-11-18-23-56-21/avfall.
These must be documented either in the environmental management system or in the action plan for the Eco-Lighthouse's annual climate and environmental report’
https://rapportering.miljofyrtarn.no/Account/Login?ReturnUrl=%2F; za dostop se obrnite na fundacijo ELH.
Obligation to maintain internal control: ‘The obligation to introduce and operate internal control rests with “the person responsible” for the enterprise.
[35] http://www.regelhjelp.no/.
By this is meant the management or owner of the enterprise.
https://www.dsb.no/, povezava na lovdata (požari, eksplozije, nevarne snovi itd.): https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2002-06-14-20#KAPITTEL_2.
Although internal control must be performed at all levels of the enterprise, the main responsibility for initiating the system and for maintaining it) is vested in top management of the enterprise.
[37] https://www.dsb.no/.
This section makes clear, however, that internal control must be introduced and operated in collaboration with the employees, the working environment committee, safety delegate(s) and/or employee representatives where such exist ’
Izvleček iz smernic ICR Periodični pregled dejavnosti na področju zdravja, okolja in varnosti.
The legal authority for the criterion is the Regulations relating to Systematic Health, Environmental and Safety Activities in Enterprises (Internal Control Regulations), section 5.7.
Podjetje mora imeti za pregled vzpostavljen rutinski pisni postopek.
Legal link: https://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/hms/internkontroll/ and for further reference: http://www.hse.gov.uk/.
Rezultati pregleda morajo biti enostavno dostopni.
To the certifier and to the organisation in general
Pomembno je poiskati vzroke in zagotoviti, da se ne ponovijo.
http://www.miljofyrtarn.no/dokumenter/bransjekrav/844-general-industry-criteria/file and http://www.miljofyrtarn.no/dokumenter/bransjekrav/866-guidance-to-the-general-industry-criteria/file
Povzeto iz: smernice ter predpisi o sistematičnih dejavnostih na področju zdravja, varnosti in okolja www.arbeidstilsynet.no/binfil/download2.php?tid=77839 (različica pdf).
Statistics as provided by ELH on hotels: http://miljofyrtarn.no/dokumenter/bransjekrav/864-industry-criteria-hotel/file and on retail grocery: http://miljofyrtarn.no/dokumenter/bransjekrav/863-industry-criteria-retail-grocery-store/file
Celotna zakonodaja je na voljo na naslovu http://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/fakta.html?tid=78950, angleška različica pa na naslovu:
Eco-Lighthouse guidance to the General Industry criteria 4.5.2017 — Criteria 1963: ‘A separate assessment of other environmental aspects will suffice, where the enterprise considers it necessary to implement additional measures.
http://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/artikkel.html?tid=78622.
The enterprise is free to choose which method it wishes to implement in order to address these environmental aspects, but it can be tied in with the risk analysis for the external environment’.
[40] Splošno merilo 7: Podjetje mora pri prvem certificiranju pripraviti podnebno in okoljsko poročilo.
ELH certifiers are trained to assess compliance with factual criteria, not to perform a specific assessment of the different environmental aspects.
Po prvem certificiranju je treba pripraviti letno podnebno in okoljsko poročilo za celotno prihodnje koledarsko leto in ga do 1. aprila naložiti na portal fundacije Eco-Lighthouse.
See also requirement 4: Legal compliance
Letno podnebno in okoljsko poročilo se da na voljo širši javnosti, strankam, dobaviteljem in sodelujočim partnerjem.
Highlighting these methodological differences is particularly relevant in light of the Article 4 of the Regulation.
Priročnik za certificiranje po sistemu ELH – postopek certificiranja: Vseh meril ni mogoče preveriti enako temeljito, vendar je treba merila, označena s simbolom „D“ (dokumentacija) dokumentirati.
Replacing the EMAS Environmental Review by the ELH Environmental Statement would not function in the context of an EMAS implementation.
Okoljski pregledi bi morali vzbujati zaupanje in se šteti za temeljite ter s tem predstavljati glavno podlago za odločanje o tem, kaj bi bilo treba preveriti.
in accordance with EMAS Annex II points A.2
Izdajatelj certifikata določi, katere pogoje bi bilo treba temeljito proučiti in katera merila se lahko preverijo na kraju samem.
GIC 1944: The enterprise must ensure access to an updated overview of relevant laws and regulations pertaining to health, environment and safety.
Če svetovalec, ki izvaja okoljski pregled, zagotovi, da so panožna merila izpolnjena, se lahko izdajatelj certifikata načeloma zanese na to, če ni nobenih znakov o nasprotnem (slabo izveden okoljski pregled, nezanesljivi zaključki, druge okoliščine) .
http://www.regelhjelp.no/ and http://www.miljofyrtarn.no/dette-er-milj%C3%B8fyrt%C3%A5rn/bransjekriterier
Splošno merilo 1963: „Podjetje mora opredeliti druge pomembne okoljske vidike podjetja ter razmisliti o morebitnih potrebnih ukrepih in/ali vključitvi v letno podnebno in okoljsko poročilo in/ali spremljanju z akcijskim načrtom.“
EMAS Regulation, Annex II, B.2(2).
* Splošne zahteve
GIC 1950 ‘The enterprise must establish procedures for reporting and handling non-compliance.’
* Okoljska politika
http://eco-lighthouse.org/statistikk/ the guidance to the criteria is found at the end of the document
Preverjanje in potrjevanje
GIC 1933: ‘The enterprise must identify other significant environmental aspects of the enterprise, and consider any necessary action and/or inclusion in the annual climate and environmental report and/or monitoring through the action plan’.
Okoljska izjava ter letno podnebno in okoljsko poročilo
Note that the HSE(Arbeidsmiljøutvalg) and the ELH (Miljøgruppe) group are different entities.
Sistem okoljkega ravnanja
The HES group is legally required when there are more than 50 employees.
V večjih organizacijah se okoljski upravnik včasih udeleži tečaja za svetovalce za sistem ELH (s čimer se usposobi za notranjega svetovalca (internkonsulent)).
There is no compulsion to have an ELH group, but it is recommended by the ELH in organisations with more than a certain number of employees.
Njegove naloge so opredeljene pod zahtevo 6 (Organizacijska struktura, usposabljanje in vključevanje zaposlenih).
Excerpt from ICR guidelines ‘Periodical review of health, environmental and safety activities.
Ta politika vključuje različne elemente, navedene v Prilogi II k uredbi o sistemu EMAS (člen 4(1)(b) in oddelek A.2 Priloge II).
In addition to the regular follow-ups (e.g. safety inspections, personnel meetings, etc.), the enterprise must, at least once a year, carry out a more comprehensive review of HSE activities and evaluate whether they are working in practice.
Vzpostaviti in izvajati je treba okoljski akcijski program za doseganje teh ciljev (člen 18(7), oddelka A.2 in A.3.3 Priloge II).
The annual climate and environmental report shall be made available to the general public, customers, suppliers and cooperation partners’.
Preverjanje in potrievanje
see part 7
Merila sistema okoljskega ravnanja, vključno s politoko, cilji, notranjo presojo, upravljan-jem zdravja, varnosti in okolja, analizo tveganja, vodstvenim pregledom itd.
ELH certification handbook — certification process: ‘Not all criteria can be checked equally thoroughly, but criteria marked “D” (documentation) must be documented.
S tem integriranim postopkom pregleda mora podjetje proučiti, ali sistem upravljanja zdravja, varnosti in okolja dobro deluje v praksi in ali je dobro strukturiran.Rezultat tega sta vključitev okoljskih postopkov sistema ELH v že obstoječi sistem upravljanja zdravja, varnosti in okolja ter okrepitev sistema okoljskega ravnanja kot celote, tako z vidika delovnega kot zunanjega okolja.
Environmental reviews should inspire confidence and be seen to be thorough, and thereby constitute the main basis for deciding what should be checked.
Letno podnebno in okoljsko poročilo
GIC 1963: ‘The enterprise must identify other significant environmental aspects of the enterprise, and consider any necessary action and/or inclusion in the annual climate and environmental report and/or monitoring through the action plan.’
Vodstveni pregled je formalno zajet v splošnem merilu 6, v katerem je navedeno, da mora vodstvo opraviti letni pregled sistema upravljanja zdravja, varnosti in okolja ter postopkov sistema Eco-Lighthouse, da oceni, ali delujejo skladno s svojim namenom.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2287
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/2287
specifying the forms to be used in relation to the import of mercury and of certain mixtures of mercury pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council on mercury
o obrazcih, ki se uporabljajo pri uvozu živega srebra in nekaterih njegovih zmesi v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2017/852 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o živem srebru
(notified under document C(2017) 8190)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2017) 8190)
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on mercury, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008 [1], and in particular Article 6 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2017/852 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2017 o živem srebru in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1102/2008 [1] ter zlasti člena 6 Uredbe,
In line with Article 3 of the Minamata Convention on Mercury (‘the Minamata Convention’) [2], Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/852 provides that mercury and certain mixtures of mercury may be imported into the customs territory of the Union, for purposes other than disposal as waste, only if the importing Member State has granted written consent to the import.
V skladu s členom 3 Konvencije Minamata o živem srebru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija Minamata) [2] člen 4(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/852 določa, da se uvoz živega srebra in uvoz določenih zmesi živega srebra na carinsko območje Unije za druge namene kot odstranjevanje odpadkov dovoli le, če država članica uvoznica poda pisno soglasje za ta uvoz.
Where the exporting country is not a party to the Minamata Convention, consent may only be granted if the exporting country has also provided certification that the mercury is not from primary mercury mining.
Če država izvoznica ni pogodbenica Konvencije Minamata, se soglasje lahko poda le, če država izvoznica predloži tudi potrdilo, da živo srebro ni bilo pridobljeno s primarnim izkopom živega srebra.
The forms for granting or denying such consent and for certifying that the mercury is not from primary mercury mining should be consistent with the forms set out in Decision UNEP/MC/COP.1/5 [3] adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Minamata Convention at its first meeting and adjusted as necessary to take account of the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2017/852.
Obrazca za podajo ali zavrnitev takšnega soglasja in izdajo potrdila, da živo srebro ni bilo pridobljeno s primarnim izkopom, bi morala biti skladna z obrazcema iz Sklepa UNEP/MC/COP.1/5 [3], ki so ga sprejeli na prvem srečanju konference pogodbenic Konvencije Minamata, in po potrebi popravljena po zahtevah iz Uredbe (EU) 2017/852.
For consistency with the date of application of Regulation (EU) 2017/852, the application of this Decision should be deferred to 1 January 2018.
Zaradi skladnosti z datumom začetka uporabe Uredbe (EU) 2017/852 bi bilo treba začetek uporabe tega sklepa odložiti do 1. januarja 2018.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 22 of Regulation (EU) 2017/852,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 22 Uredbe (EU) 2017/852 –
The form to be used by Member States when granting or denying written consent pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/852 is set out in Annex I to this Decision.
Obrazec, ki ga države članice uporabijo za podajo ali zavrnitev pisnega soglasja v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 4(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/852, je določen v Prilogi I k temu sklepu.
However, this Article does not apply in the case of imports of mercury, or a mixture of mercury, that qualifies as or is considered to be waste within the meaning of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].Article 2
Vendar ta člen ne velja za uvoz živega srebra ali zmesi živega srebra, ki se šteje ali obravnava kot odpadek v smislu Direktive 2008/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].Člen 2
Member States may grant written consent pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/852 in the circumstances set out in point (b) of that subparagraph only if the certification required by that point is in the form set out in Annex II to this Decision.
Države članice lahko podajo pisno soglasje v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 4(1) Uredbe (EU) 2017/852 v okoliščinah iz točke (b) navedenega pododstavka le, če je potrdilo, zahtevano v navedeni točki, izdano na obrazcu iz Priloge II k temu sklepu.
However, this Article does not apply in the case of imports of mercury, or a mixture of mercury, that qualifies as or is considered to be waste within the meaning of Directive 2008/98/EC.
Vendar ta člen ne velja za uvoz živega srebra ali zmesi živega srebra, ki se šteje ali obravnava kot odpadek v smislu Direktive 2008/98/ES.
Done at Brussels, 8 December 2017.
V Bruslju, 8. decembra 2017
OJ L 137, 24.5.2017, p. 1.
UL L 137, 24.5.2017, str. 1.
The Union ratified the Minamata Convention by means of Council Decision (EU) 2017/939 of 11 May 2017 on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Minamata Convention on Mercury (OJ L 142, 2.6.2017, p. 4).
Unija je ratificira Konvencijo Minamata s Sklepom Sveta (EU) 2017/939 z dne 11. maja 2017 o sklenitvi Konvencije Minamata o živem srebru v imenu Evropske unije (UL L 142, 2.6.2017, str. 4).
Decision UNEP/MC/COP.1/5 entitled ‘Guidance in relation to mercury supply sources and trade (article 3), particularly in regard to identification of stocks and sources of supply (paragraph 5 (a)) and forms and guidance for obtaining consent to import mercury (paragraphs 6 and 8)’ adopted on 24 September 2017.
Sklep UNEP/MC/COP.1/5 z naslovom „Guidance in relation to mercury supply sources and trade (article 3), particularly in regard to identification of stocks and sources of supply (paragraph 5(a)) and forms and guidance for obtaining consent to import mercury (paragraphs 6 and 8)“ (Smernice za vire živega srebra in trgovino (člen 3), zlasti glede identifikacije zalog in virov dobave (odstavek 5(a)), ter obrazci in smernice za pridobitev soglasja za uvoz živega srebra (odstavka 6 in 8)), sprejet 24. septembra 2017.