natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Rear Admiral (LH) Andrea ROMANI is hereby appointed EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA) as from 4 April 2017.
Kontraadmiral (LH) Andrea ROMANI se s 4. aprilom 2017 imenuje za poveljnika sil EU v vojaški operaciji Evropske unije v južnem delu osrednjega Sredozemlja (operacija EUNAVFOR MED SOPHIA).
Decision (CFSP) 2016/1079 is hereby repealed with effect from 4 April 2017.
Sklep (SZVP) 2016/1079 se razveljavi z učinkom od 4. aprila 2017.
This Decision shall enter into force on 4 April 2017.
Ta sklep začne veljati 4. aprila 2017.
Done at Brussels, 29 March 2017.
V Bruslju, 29. marca 2017
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2017/682
Sklep Političnega in varnostnega odbora (SZVP) 2017/682
on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2016/332 (BiH/25/2017)
o imenovanju poveljnika sil EU za vojaško operacijo Evropske unije v Bosni in Hercegovini ter razveljavitvi Sklepa (SZVP) 2016/332 (BiH/25/2017)
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2004/570/CFSP of 12 July 2004 on a European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina [1], and in particular Article 6 (1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2004/570/SZVP z dne 12. julija 2004 o vojaški operaciji Evropske unije v Bosni in Hercegovini [1] in zlasti člena 6(1) Skupnega ukrepa,
Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Joint Action 2004/570/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (the ‘EU Force Commander’).
Svet je v skladu s členom 6(1) Skupnega ukrepa 2004/570/SZVP za sprejemanje ustreznih sklepov o imenovanju poveljnika sil EU za vojaško operacijo Evropske unije v Bosni in Hercegovini (v nadaljnjem besedilu: poveljnik sil EU) pooblastil Politični in varnostni odbor (PVO).
On 23 February 2016, the PSC adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/332 [2] appointing Major General Friedrich SCHRÖTTER as EU Force Commander.
PVO je 23. februarja 2016 sprejel Sklep (SZVP) 2016/332 [2] o imenovanju generalmajorja Friedricha SCHRÖTTERJA za poveljnika sil EU.
The EU Operation Commander has recommended the appointment of Brigadier General Anton WALDNER as the new EU Force Commander to succeed Major General Friedrich SCHRÖTTER as from 28 March 2017.
Poveljnik operacije EU je priporočil, da se za novega poveljnika sil EU imenuje brigadni general Anton WALDNER, ki bo od 28. marca 2017 na tem položaju nasledil generalmajorja Friedricha SCHRÖTTERJA.
The EU Military Committee supports that recommendation.
Vojaški odbor EU navedeno priporočilo podpira.
Decision (CFSP) 2016/332 should therefore be repealed.
Sklep (SZVP) 2016/332 bi bilo zato treba razveljaviti.
On 12 and 13 December 2002, the Copenhagen European Council adopted a declaration stating that the ‘Berlin plus’ arrangements and the implementation thereof will apply only to those Member States of the Union which are also either NATO members or parties to the ‘Partnership for Peace’, and which have consequently concluded bilateral security agreements with NATO,
Evropski svet je 12. in 13. decembra 2002 v Københavnu sprejel izjavo, da ureditev „Berlin plus“ in njeno izvajanje veljata le za tiste države članice Unije, ki so tudi članice Nata ali pogodbenice „Partnerstva za mir“, na podlagi katerega so posledično sklenile dvostranske sporazume o varnosti z Natom –
Brigadier General Anton WALDNER is hereby appointed EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina as from 28 March 2017.
Brigadni general Anton WALDNER je od 28. marca 2017 imenovan za poveljnika sil EU za vojaško operacijo Evropske unije v Bosni in Hercegovini.
Decision (CFSP) 2016/332 is hereby repealed.
Sklep (SZVP) 2016/332 se razveljavi.
This Decision shall enter into force on 28 March 2017.
Ta sklep začne veljati 28. marca 2017.
Decision (EU) 2017/684 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep (EU) 2017/684 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
of 5 April 2017
z dne 5. aprila 2017
on establishing an information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments between Member States and third countries in the field of energy, and repealing Decision No 994/2012/EU
o vzpostavitvi mehanizma za izmenjavo informacij v zvezi z medvladnimi sporazumi in nezavezujočimi instrumenti med državami članicami in tretjimi državami na področju energije ter o razveljavitvi Sklepa št. 994/2012/EU
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 194(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 194(2) Pogodbe,
Transparency and compliance with Union law represents an important element in ensuring the energy stability of the Union.
Pomembna elementa zagotavljanja energetske stabilnosti Unije sta preglednost in skladnost s pravom Unije.
In order to safeguard the Union's energy supply, it is necessary to diversify energy sources and build new energy interconnections between Member States.
Da bo oskrba Unije z energijo zavarovana, je treba zagotoviti raznovrstnost virov energije in zgraditi nove energetske povezave med državami članicami.
At the same time, it is essential to increase cooperation with regard to energy security with the Union's neighbouring countries and with strategic partners.
Obenem je na področju energetske varnosti treba nujno okrepiti sodelovanje Unije s sosednjimi državami in strateškimi partnerji.
The objective of the Energy Union Strategy, as adopted by the Commission on 25 February 2015, is to give consumers secure, sustainable, competitive and affordable energy.
Cilj strategije za energetsko unijo, ki jo je Komisija sprejela 25. februarja 2015, je odjemalcem zagotoviti zanesljivo, trajnostno, konkurenčno in cenovno dostopno energijo.
Pursuing energy, trade and external policies in a coherent and consistent manner will contribute significantly to achieving that objective.
K doseganju tega cilja bo pomembno prispevalo skladno in dosledno izvajanje energetske, trgovinske in zunanje politike.
In the same spirit, the European Council in its conclusions of 19 March 2015 called for full compliance with Union law of all agreements related to the buying of gas from external suppliers, notably by reinforcing transparency of such agreements and compatibility with Union energy security provisions.
Sklep št. 994/2012/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] je bil koristen za prejemanje informacij o obstoječih medvladnih sporazumih in za prepoznavanje njihovih težav glede usklajenosti s pravom Unije.
The European Parliament, in its resolution of 15 December 2015 entitled ‘Towards a European Energy Union’, stressed the need to enhance the coherence of the Union's external energy security policies and greater transparency in energy-related agreements.
Vseeno se je Sklep št. 994/2012/EU izkazal za neuspešnega pri zagotavljanju usklajenosti medvladnih sporazumov s pravom Unije.
Decision No 994/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] has been useful for receiving information on existing intergovernmental agreements and for identifying problems posed by them in terms of their compatibility with Union law.
Navedeni sklep se je zanašal predvsem na oceno medvladnih sporazumov s strani Komisije potem, ko so jih države članice že sklenile s tretjimi državami.
However, Decision No 994/2012/EU has proved to be ineffective in terms of ensuring the compliance of intergovernmental agreements with Union law.
Izkušnje, pridobljene pri izvajanju Sklepa št. 994/2012/EU, so pokazale, da taka naknadna ocena ne izkorišča v celoti potenciala za zagotavljanje usklajenosti medvladnih sporazumov s pravom Unije.
That Decision has mainly relied on the assessment of intergovernmental agreements by the Commission after they were concluded by the Member States with a third country.
Pogosto medvladni sporazumi namreč ne vsebujejo primernih klavzul o prenehanju ali prilagoditvi, ki bi državam članicam omogočile, da v razumnem času odpravijo kakršne koli neskladnosti.
Experience gained in the implementation of Decision No 994/2012/EU has demonstrated that such an ex-post assessment does not fully exploit the potential for ensuring the compliance of intergovernmental agreements with Union law.
Poleg tega so podpisniki že zavzeli stališča, kar ustvarja politični pritisk, naj se ne spremeni noben vidik sporazuma.
In particular, intergovernmental agreements often contain no appropriate termination or adaptation clauses which would allow Member States to eliminate any non-compliance within a reasonable period of time.
Velika mera preglednosti nad sporazumi med državami članicami in tretjimi državami na področju energije bo prispevala tudi k temu, da se bo znotraj Unije vzpostavilo tesnejše sodelovanje pri zunanjih odnosih na področju energije in pri doseganju dolgoročnih ciljev politike Unije v zvezi z energijo, podnebjem in zanesljivo oskrbo z energijo.
Furthermore, the positions of the signatories have already been fixed, which creates political pressure not to change any aspect of the agreement.
Da bi se izognili neskladnostim s pravom Unije in povečali preglednost, bi morale države članice Komisijo čim prej obvestiti o nameri za začetek pogajanj z namenom sklenitve novih medvladnih sporazumov ali sprememb medvladnih sporazumov.
A high degree of transparency with regard to agreements between Member States and third countries in the field of energy will be of benefit in achieving both closer intra-Union cooperation in the field of external energy relations and the Union's long-term policy objectives relating to energy, climate and security of energy supply.
Komisijo bi morale o poteku pogajanj redno obveščati.
In order to avoid any non-compliance with Union law and to enhance transparency, Member States should inform the Commission of their intention to enter into negotiations with regard to new intergovernmental agreements or amendments to intergovernmental agreements as soon as possible.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da Komisijo povabijo, da na pogajanjih sodeluje kot opazovalka.
The Commission should be kept informed regularly of the progress of the negotiations.
Komisija bi morala imeti možnost, da zaprosi, da se jo na pogajanja povabi kot opazovalko.
Member States should have the possibility to invite the Commission to participate in the negotiations as an observer.
Med pogajanji o medvladnem sporazumu bi morala imeti Komisija možnost, da zadevni državi članici svetuje, kako preprečiti neusklajenost navedenega sporazuma s pravom Unije.
The Commission should be able to request to participate in the negotiations as an observer.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti s pravom Unije in ob ustreznem upoštevanju dejstva, da imajo medvladni sporazumi in spremembe na področju plina in nafte trenutno relativno največji vpliv na pravilno delovanje notranjega energetskega trga in zanesljivo oskrbo z energijo Unije, bi morale države članice Komisiji predhodno priglasiti osnutke medvladnih sporazumov, ki zadevajo plin ali nafto, preden ti za pogodbene stranke postanejo pravno zavezujoči.
However, this should not form part of the legal assessment of the Commission of the draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment.
Komisija bi morala imeti za tako oceno dovolj časa, saj bi to zagotavljalo največjo možno pravno varnost, hkrati pa bi se izognili nepotrebnim zamudam.
In order to ensure compliance with Union law, and with due regard to the fact that intergovernmental agreements and amendments in the area of gas or oil currently have the largest relative repercussions on the proper functioning of the internal energy market and on the security of energy supply of the Union, Member States should, on an ex-ante basis, notify draft intergovernmental agreements relating to gas or oil to the Commission before they become legally binding on the parties.
Komisija bi morala po potrebi pretehtati možnost skrajšanja predvidenih rokov za oceno, zlati če za to zaprosi država članica ali če je država članica Komisijo med pogajanji dovolj podrobno obveščala, pri čemer bi bilo treba tudi upoštevati v kolikšni meri osnutek medvladnega sporazuma ali sprememba temelji na vzorčnih klavzulah.
In a spirit of cooperation, the Commission should support the Member State in identifying compliance issues of the draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment.
Da se podpora Komisije izkoristi v celoti, države članice ne bi smele skleniti medvladnega sporazuma, ki zadeva plin ali nafto, ali medvladnega sporazuma, ki zadeva elektriko, kadar je država članica zaprosila za predhodno oceno Komisije, vse dokler je Komisija ne obvesti o svoji oceni.
The Member State concerned would then be better prepared to conclude an agreement that complies with Union law.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi poiskale primerno rešitev za odpravo kakršne koli ugotovljene neusklajenosti.
The Commission should have sufficient time for such an assessment in order to provide for as much legal certainty as possible while avoiding undue delays.
Pri strategiji za energetsko unijo je preglednost nad preteklimi in prihodnjimi medvladnimi sporazumi še naprej izjemno pomembna in je pomemben element zagotavljanja energetske stabilnosti Unije.
The Commission should consider shortening the periods that are provided for its assessment if appropriate, in particular if a Member State so requests or has kept the Commission informed in sufficient detail during the negotiations phase, and having regard to the extent to which the draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment is based on model clauses.
Zato bi morale države članice Komisiji še naprej priglašati obstoječe in prihodnje medvladne sporazume, ki so začeli veljati ali se začasno uporabljajo v smislu člena 25 Dunajske konvencije o pravu mednarodnih pogodb, ter nove medvladne sporazume.
In order to benefit fully from the Commission's support, Member States should refrain from concluding an intergovernmental agreement relating to gas or oil, or an intergovernmental agreement relating to electricity where a Member State has chosen to request ex-ante assessment by the Commission, until the Commission has informed the Member State of its assessment.
Komisija bi morala oceniti, ali so medvladni sporazumi, ki veljajo ali se začasno uporabljajo na dan začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa, usklajeni s pravom Unije in države članice ustrezno obvestiti.
The Member States should take all necessary steps to reach a suitable solution to eliminate any incompatibility identified.
Države članice bi morale v primeru neusklajenosti sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi poiskale primerno rešitev za odpravo kakršne koli ugotovljene neusklajenosti.
In light of the Energy Union Strategy, transparency with regard to past and future intergovernmental agreements continues to be of upmost importance and is an important element in ensuring the Union's energy stability.
Ta sklep bi se moral uporabljati za medvladne sporazume.
Therefore, Member States should continue notifying to the Commission existing and future intergovernmental agreements, whether they have entered into force or are being applied provisionally within the meaning of Article 25 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and new intergovernmental agreements.
Medvladni sporazumi namero pogodbenih strank o tem, ali bi moral biti sporazum zavezujoč v celoti ali delno, izražajo zlasti s svojo vsebino, ne glede na njihovo uradno poimenovanje.
The Commission should assess the compatibility with Union law of intergovernmental agreements that are in force or apply provisionally on the date of entry into force of this Decision, and inform the Member States accordingly.
Priglasiti bi bilo treba samo tiste medvladne sporazume, ki zadevajo nabavo, trgovanje, prodajo, tranzit ali shranjevanje energije ali oskrbo z njo v vsaj eni državi članici oziroma v vsaj eno državo članico, ali izgradnjo ali delovanje energetske infrastrukture s fizično povezavo z vsaj eno državo članico.
In the event of incompatibility, Member States should take all necessary steps to reach a suitable solution to eliminate the incompatibility identified.
Kadar bi bile v dvomu, bi se morale države članice brez odlašanja posvetovati s Komisijo.
This Decision should apply to intergovernmental agreements.
Načeloma s tem sklepom ne bi smeli biti zajeti sporazumi, ki ne veljajo več oziroma se več ne uporabljajo.
Intergovernmental agreements express, in particular in their content, and regardless of their formal designation, the intention of the parties that the agreement should have binding force, entirely or in part.
Za namene tega sklepa instrument šteje za medvladni sporazum, če ima instrument ali njegov del pravno zavezujoč učinek, ne pa, če je takšno njegovo uradno poimenovanje, oziroma če nima zavezujočega pravnega učinka, šteje za nezavezujoč instrument.
Only intergovernmental agreements that concern the purchase, trade, sale, transit, storage or supply of energy in or to at least one Member State, or the construction or operation of energy infrastructure with a physical connection to at least one Member State should be notified.
Države članice vzpostavljajo odnose s tretjimi državami ne le s sklepanjem medvladnih sporazumov, temveč tudi v obliki nezavezujočih instrumentov, ki so pogosto uradno poimenovani kot memorandumi o soglasju, skupne izjave, skupne ministrske izjave, skupni ukrepi, skupni kodeksi ravnanja ali s podobnimi izrazi.
Where in doubt, Member States should consult the Commission without delay.
Ker ti instrumenti niso pravno zavezujoči, od držav članic ni možno pravno zahtevati, da jih izvajajo, tudi ne tedaj, ko njihovo izvajanje ni v skladu s pravom Unije.
In principle, agreements that are no longer in force or are no longer applied should not be covered by this Decision.
Tudi če ti instrumenti niso pravno zavezujoči, se lahko uporabljajo za določanje podrobnega okvira energetske infrastrukture in oskrbe z energijo.
It is the legally binding force of an instrument, or of parts thereof, not its formal designation, that qualifies it as an intergovernmental agreement or, in the absence of legally binding force, as a non-binding instrument for the purposes of this Decision.
Zaradi večje preglednosti bi moralo biti državam članicam omogočeno, da Komisiji predložijo nezavezujoče instrumente, predvsem dogovore med eno ali več državami članicami in eno ali več tretjimi državami, ki niso pravno zavezujoči in ki določajo pogoje za oskrbo z energijo ali razvoj energetskih infrastruktur, tudi tako, da vsebujejo razlago prava Unije za ta namen, ali spremembo teh nezavezujočih instrumentov, vključno z vsemi njihovimi prilogami.
Member States establish relations with third countries not only by concluding intergovernmental agreements, but also in the form of non-binding instruments, which are often formally designated as memorandums of understanding, joint declarations, ministerial joint declarations, joint actions, joint codes of conduct, or similar terms.
Če se nezavezujoči instrument ali sprememba izrecno sklicuje na druga besedila, bi moralo biti državi članici tudi omogočeno, da predloži ta druga besedila.
Because they are not legally binding, Member States cannot be legally required to implement such instruments, including where such implementation is incompatible with Union law.
S tem sklepom ne bi smeli biti zajeti medvladni sporazumi in nezavezujoči instrumenti, ki morajo biti Komisiji v celoti priglašeni na podlagi drugih aktov Unije ali ki zadevajo področja, ki spadajo v okvir Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo.
Even if they are not legally binding, such instruments can be used to set out a detailed framework for energy infrastructure and energy supply.
Ta sklep ne bi smel ustvarjati obveznosti v zvezi s sporazumi med podjetji.
In the interest of greater transparency, Member States should be able to submit to the Commission non-binding instruments, namely arrangements between one or more Member States and one or more third countries which are not legally binding and which set out the conditions for energy supply or for the development of energy infrastructures, including by containing interpretations of Union law in this respect, or amendments to such non-binding instruments, including any annexes thereto.
Vendar pa bi morale imeti države članice svobodo, da Komisiji prostovoljno pošljejo sporazume, na katere se medvladni sporazumi ali nezavezujoči instrumenti izrecno sklicujejo.
If a non-binding instrument or an amendment refers explicitly to other texts, the Member State should also be able to submit those other texts.
Komisija bi morala prejete informacije o medvladnih sporazumih dati na voljo vsem drugim državam članicam v varni elektronski obliki, da bi na ta način prispevala k večji koordinaciji in preglednosti med državami članicami in tako okrepila njihovo pogajalsko moč do tretjih držav.
Intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments which need to be notified in their entirety to the Commission on the basis of other Union acts or which concern matters that fall within the scope of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, should not be covered by this Decision.
Komisija bi morala spoštovati zahteve držav članic, da se predložene informacije obravnavajo kot zaupne.
This Decision should not create obligations as regards agreements between undertakings.
Zahteve glede zaupnosti ne bi smele omejevati dostopa Komisije do zaupnih informacij, ker Komisija za svoje ocene potrebuje celovite informacije.
However, Member States should be free to communicate to the Commission, on a voluntary basis, such agreements that are referred to explicitly in intergovernmental agreements or non-binding instruments.
Za zagotavljanje uporabe klavzule o zaupnosti bi morala biti odgovorna Komisija.
The Commission should make information it receives on intergovernmental agreements available to all other Member States in secure electronic form, in order to enhance coordination and transparency between Member States, thus leveraging their negotiation power vis-à-vis third countries.
Zahteve glede zaupnosti ne posegajo v pravico dostopa do dokumentov, kakor je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
The Commission should respect requests from Member States to treat information submitted to it as confidential.
Če država članica meni, da je medvladni sporazum zaupen, bi morala Komisiji predložiti povzetek, v katerem so navedeni predmet urejanja, namen, področje uporabe, trajanje, pogodbene stranke in podatki o glavnih elementih sporazuma, da se s povzetkom seznanijo druge države članice.
Requests for confidentiality should, however, not restrict access of the Commission itself to confidential information, as the Commission needs to have comprehensive information for its own assessments.
Stalna izmenjava informacij o medvladnih sporazumih na ravni Unije bi morala omogočiti razvoj najboljših praks.
The Commission should be responsible for guaranteeing the application of the confidentiality clause.
Na podlagi teh najboljših praks bi morala Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami in po potrebi v sodelovanju z Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, ko gre za zunanjo politiko Unije, pripraviti neobvezne vzorčne klavzule za uporabo v medvladnih sporazumih med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, pa tudi napotke, vključno s primeri klavzul, ki niso skladne s pravom Unije in se zato ne bi smele uporabljati.
Requests for confidentiality are without prejudice to the right of access to documents as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Uporaba teh vzorčnih klavzul bi morala biti namenjena preprečitvi neskladnosti med medvladnimi sporazumi in pravom Unije, zlasti s pravili notranjega energetskega trga ter konkurenčnega prava Unije, in neskladnosti z mednarodnimi sporazumi, ki jih je sklenila Unija.