natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where several procedural representatives have been appointed for a single party, notification to any one of those representatives shall be sufficient, unless a specific address for service has been indicated.
Kadar je bilo imenovanih več zastopnikov v postopku za eno stranko, zadostuje vročitev uradnega obvestila kateremu koli od navedenih zastopnikov, razen če je bil naveden poseben naslov za vročitev.
Where several parties have appointed a common procedural representative, notification of the relevant documents to that representative shall be sufficient.’
Kadar je več strank imenovalo skupnega zastopnika v postopku, zadostuje vročitev zadevnih dokumentov navedenemu zastopniku.“;
The second sentence of Article 67 is replaced by the following: ‘The President of the Office shall determine details as to the issue of a public notice and shall determine the period within which the relevant document shall be deemed to have been notified.’
drugi stavek člena 67 se nadomesti z naslednjim: „Predsednik Urada določi podrobnosti glede javne objave in določi rok, v katerem se zadevni dokument šteje za vročenega.“;
Article 71 is amended as follows:
člen 71 se spremeni:
in paragraph 1, the second sentence is replaced by the following: ‘The days referred to in the first sentence shall be as stated by the President of the Office before the commencement of each calendar year and shall be published in the Official Gazette referred to in Article 87.’;
v odstavku 1 se drugi stavek nadomesti z naslednjim: „Dneve, navedene v prvem stavku, določi predsednik Urada pred začetkom vsakega koledarskega leta, nato se objavijo v Uradnem listu iz člena 87.“;
‘As regards documents submitted by electronic means, the first subparagraph shall apply mutatis mutandis where there is an interruption of the connection of the Office or of one of the parties to the proceedings to the electronic means of communication.
„V zvezi z dokumenti, predloženimi v elektronski obliki, se prvi pododstavek uporablja smiselno v primerih prekinitve povezave Urada ali ene od strank v postopku z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi sredstvi.
Parties to the proceedings shall demonstrate the interruption of the connection with the electronic provider.’
Stranke v postopku dokažejo prekinitev povezave s ponudnikom elektronskih storitev.“;
Article 73 is amended as follows:
člen 73 se spremeni:
Two or more parties to proceedings acting in common shall appoint one procedural representative and notify the Office thereof.
V postopku sodelujeta najmanj dve stranki, ki imenujeta enega zastopnika v postopku in o tem obvestita Urad.
Where they have not notified a procedural representative to the Office, the party to the proceedings first named in an application for a Community plan variety right or for an exploitation right to be granted by the Office or in an objection shall be deemed to be appointed as the procedural representative of the other party or parties to the proceedings.’;
Kadar Urada niso obvestile o zastopniku v postopku, se šteje, da je stranka v postopku, ki je prva navedena v prijavi za žlahtniteljsko pravico v Skupnosti ali za pravico izkoriščanja, ki jo podeli Urad, ali v ugovoru, imenovana za zastopnika v postopku druge stranke ali strank v postopku.“;
Paragraph 5 shall apply where, in the course of proceedings, a transfer of a Community plant variety right is made to more than one person and where such persons have appointed more than one procedural representative.’
Odstavek 5 se uporablja, kadar se med postopkom izvede prenos žlahtniteljske pravice v Skupnosti na več kot eno osebo in kadar so take osebe imenovale več kot enega zastopnika v postopku.“;
Article 74 is amended as follows:
člen 74 se spremeni:
Credentials may cover one or more proceedings.
Poverilnice lahko veljajo za več kot en postopek.
A single document embodying the general credentials shall be sufficient.’;
Zadostuje en sam dokument, ki vsebuje splošne poverilnice.“;
The entry of a procedural representative in the Register of Applications for Community Plant Variety Rights shall be deleted:
Vpis zastopnika v postopku se iz registra prijav za žlahtniteljske pravice v Skupnosti črta:
in the event of the death or legal incapacity of the procedural representative;
v primeru smrti ali pravne nesposobnosti zastopnika v postopku;
where the procedural representative is no longer domiciled or no longer has his seat or establishment within the European Union;
kadar zastopnik v postopku nima več stalnega prebivališča ali sedeža ali podjetja v Evropski uniji;
where the procedural representative is no longer appointed by the party to the proceedings and the party has informed the Office accordingly.’
kadar stranka v postopku ne imenuje več zastopnika v postopku in je o tem obvestila Urad.“;
Article 78(1) is amended as follows:
člen 78(1) se spremeni:
a particular claim regarding priority pursuant to Article 20 of this Regulation (date and place of the earlier application);’;
poseben zahtevek glede prednostne pravice v skladu s členom 20 te uredbe (datum in kraj prejšnje prijave);“;
the giving of the right deriving from an application for a Community plant variety right as a security or as the object of any other rights in rem.’
podelitev pravice, ki izvira iz prijave za žlahtniteljsko pravico v Skupnosti, v zavarovanje ali kot predmet katerih koli drugih stvarnih pravic.“
In Article 81, paragraphs 2 and 3 are replaced by the following:
v členu 81 se odstavka 2 in 3 nadomestita z naslednjim:
Paragraph 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the institution of actions in respect of claims referred to in Articles 98 and 99 of the basic Regulation, and the final decision not subject to any appeal in, or of any other termination of, any such action.
Odstavek 1 se smiselno uporablja za uvedbo postopkov o zahtevkih, navedenih v členih 98 in 99 osnovne uredbe, in za končno odločbo, ki ni predmet nobene pritožbe, v takem postopku ali katero koli ustavitev takega postopka.
Where varieties are identified as initial or essentially derived, respectively, a request for entry by all the parties to the proceedings may be made jointly or separately.
Kadar so sorte identificirane kot izvirne ali izpeljane, se lahko zahteva za vpis izvede skupno ali posamično za vse stranke v postopku.
A request from only one party to the proceedings shall be accompanied by documentary evidence of the elements referred to in Article 87(2)(h) of the basic Regulation to replace the request of the other party.
Zahtevi samo ene stranke v postopku se priložijo listinski dokazi o elementih iz člena 87(2)(h) osnovne uredbe, da se s tem nadomesti zahteva druge stranke.
Such documentary evidence shall include the identification of the varieties concerned as initial and essentially derived, and the non-contentious acknowledgement by the other party or the final judgement.’
Taki listinski dokazi vključujejo istovetnost zadevnih izvirnih in izpeljanih sort ter nesporno soglasje druge stranke ali končno sodbo.“;
In Article 82, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
v členu 82 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
The President of the Office may provide for public inspection of the Registers on the premises of national agencies or sub-offices involved in the exercise of specific administrative functions, pursuant to Article 30(4) of the basic Regulation.’
Predsednik Urada lahko zagotovi javni vpogled v registre v prostorih nacionalnih agencij ali poduradov, vključenih v opravljanje nekaterih upravnih nalog, v skladu s členom 30(4) osnovne uredbe.“;
In Article 83, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:
v členu 83 se odstavka 1 in 2 nadomestita z naslednjim:
Documents relating to proceedings shall be kept in electronic format in electronic files, a file number being attached to such proceedings, except for those documents relating to the exclusion of, or objection to, members of the Board of Appeal, or to the staff of the Office or the Examination Office concerned, which shall be kept separately.
Dokumenti v zvezi s postopkom se shranjujejo v elektronski obliki v elektronskih spisih, taki postopki se označijo z evidenčno številko, razen tistih dokumentov, ki se nanašajo na izločitev ali ugovor v zvezi s člani Odbora za pritožbe ali osebjem Urada ali zadevnim uradom za preskušanje sort, ki se hranijo posebej.
The Office shall keep an electronic copy of the file referred in paragraph 1 (“file copy”) which shall be considered the true and complete copy of the file.
Urad hrani elektronski izvod spisa iz odstavka 1 (izvod spisa), ki velja za pravilen in popoln izvod spisa.
The Examination Office shall keep a copy of the additional documents relating to such proceedings (examination copy).’
Urad za preskušanje sort hrani izvod dodatnih dokumentov v zvezi s takim postopkom (izvod preskušanja).“;
In Article 91, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
v členu 91 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
At the time of transmission of the files to the courts or public prosecutor's offices of the Member States, the Office shall indicate the restrictions to which the inspection of documents relating to applications for, or to grants of Community plant variety rights is subject pursuant to Articles 33a and 88 of the basic Regulation.’
Ob predložitvi spisov sodiščem ali državnemu tožilstvu držav članic Urad navede omejitve, ki veljajo za pregled dokumentov v zvezi s prijavami ali podelitvami žlahtniteljskih pravic v Skupnosti v skladu s členom 33a in členom 88 osnovne uredbe.“;
Done at Brussels, 1 September 2016.
V Bruslju, 1. septembra 2016
Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 of 17 September 2009 establishing implementing rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 as regards proceedings before the Community Plant Variety Office (OJ L 251, 24.9.2009, p. 3).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 874/2009 z dne 17. septembra 2009 o določitvi izvedbenih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2100/94 v zvezi s postopkom, ki poteka na Uradu Skupnosti za rastlinske sorte (UL L 251, 24.9.2009, str. 3).
Council Directive 68/193/EEC of 9 April 1968 on the marketing of material for the vegetative propagation of the vine (OJ L 93, 17.4.1968, p. 15).
Direktiva Sveta 68/193/EGS z dne 9. aprila 1968 o trženju materiala za vegetativno razmnoževanje trte (UL L 93, 17.4.1968, str. 15).
Council Directive 2002/53/EC of 13 June 2002 on the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species (OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 1).
Direktiva Sveta 2002/53/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o skupnem katalogu sort poljščin (UL L 193, 20.7.2002, str. 1).
Council Directive 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of vegetable seed (OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 33).
Direktiva Sveta 2002/55/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o trženju semena zelenjadnic (UL L 193, 20.7.2002, str. 33).
Commission Implementing Directive 2014/97/EU of 15 October 2014 implementing Council Directive 2008/90/EC as regards the registration of suppliers and of varieties and the common list of varieties (OJ L 298, 16.10.2014, p. 16).’
Izvedbena direktiva Komisije 2014/97/EU z dne 15. oktobra 2014 o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 2008/90/ES v zvezi z registracijo dobaviteljev in sort ter skupnim seznamom sort (UL L 298, 16.10.2014, str. 16).“;
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 is amended as follows:
Priloga I k Uredbi (ES) št. 874/2009 se spremeni:
In point 3, the third sentence is replaced by the following:
v točki 3 se tretji stavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Fees may be paid to an expert only if he produces evidence by supporting documents that he is not a member of the staff of an Examination Office or a technical qualified body.’
„Plačila strokovnjaku se lahko izvedejo samo, če navede dokaze in priloži dodatne dokumente, da ni član osebja Urada za preskušanje sort ali tehnično usposobljenega organa.“;
Point 5 is amended as follows:
točka 5 se spremeni:
in point (a), ‘500’ is replaced by ‘550’;
v točki (a) se „500“ nadomesti s „550“;
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1449
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1449
supplementing Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the criteria relating to the methodology for setting the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities
o dopolnitvi Direktive 2014/59/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede regulativnih tehničnih standardov, ki določajo merila v zvezi z metodologijo za določitev minimalne zahteve glede kapitala in kvalificiranih obveznosti
Having regard to Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms [1], and in particular Article 45(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2014/59/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o vzpostavitvi okvira za sanacijo ter reševanje kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij [1], zlasti člena 45(2) navedene direktive;
Effective resolution can only be feasible and credible if adequate internal financial resources are available to an institution to absorb losses and for recapitalisation purposes without affecting certain liabilities, in particular those excluded from bail-in.
Učinkovito reševanje je izvedljivo in verjetno, če ima institucija na voljo zadostne notranje finančne vire za pokritje izgub in dokapitalizacijo, ne da bi to vplivalo na določene obveznosti, zlasti tiste, ki so izključene iz reševanja s sredstvi upnikov.
Directive 2014/59/EU provides that institutions should meet a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (‘MREL’) to avoid that institutions excessively rely on forms of funding that are excluded from bail-in, since failure to meet MREL would impact negatively institutions' loss absorption and recapitalisation capacity and, ultimately, the overall effectiveness of resolution.
Direktiva 2014/59/EU določa, da bi morale institucije izpolnjevati minimalno zahtevo glede kapitala in kvalificiranih obveznosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: minimalna zahteva glede kapitala), da bi preprečili, da se institucije preveč opirajo na oblike financiranja, ki so izključene iz reševanja s sredstvi upnikov, saj bi neizpolnjevanje minimalne zahteve glede kapitala negativno vplivalo na sposobnost institucije za pokrivanje izgub in dokapitalizacijo ter nenazadnje na splošno učinkovitost reševanja.
When determining MREL in accordance with points (a) and (b) of Article 45(6) of Directive 2014/59/EU, the resolution authority should consider the need, in case of application of the bail-in tool, to ensure that the institution is capable of absorbing an adequate amount of losses and being recapitalised by an amount sufficient to restore its Common Equity Tier 1 ratio to a level sufficient to maintain the capital requirements for authorisation and at the same time to sustain sufficient market confidence.
Organ za reševanje bi moral pri določanju minimalne zahteve glede kapitala v skladu s točkama (a) in (b) člena 45(6) Direktive 2014/59/EU v primeru uporabe instrumenta za reševanje s sredstvi upnikov upoštevati potrebo po zagotovitvi, da je institucija sposobna pokriti ustrezen znesek izgub in izvesti dokapitalizacijo z zadostnim zneskom, da se količnik navadnega lastniškega temeljnega kapitala institucije vrne na raven, zadostno za ohranitev kapitalskih zahtev za pridobitev dovoljenja ter ohranitev zadostnega tržnega zaupanja.
This close relationship with supervisory decisions requires that such assessments are made by the resolution authority in close consultation with the competent authority consistently with the framework set out in Article 45(6) of Directive 2014/59/EU, and that accordingly the resolution authority should, in the framework of the obligation of the resolution authority to consult the competent authority under Article 45(6) of Directive 2014/59/EU, take account of the assessments made by the competent authority on the business model, funding model, and risk profile of the institution for the purposes of setting prudential requirements.
Ta tesna povezanost z nadzorniškimi odločitvami zahteva, da organ za reševanje takšne ocene opravi v tesnem sodelovanju s pristojnim organom v skladu z okvirom iz člena 45(6) Direktive 2014/59/EU ter da posledično v okviru svoje obveznosti posvetovanja s pristojnim organom v skladu s členom 45(6) Direktive 2014/59/EU upošteva ocene, ki jih je pristojni organ opravil o poslovnem modelu, modelu financiranja ter profilu tveganja institucije za določitev bonitetnih zahtev.
In particular, the assessment of the necessary capacity to absorb losses should be closely linked to the institution's current capital requirements, and the assessment of the necessary capacity to restore capital should be closely linked to likely capital requirements after the application of the resolution strategy, unless there are clear reasons why losses in resolution should be assessed differently than in going concern.
Ocena potrebne sposobnosti pokrivanja izgub bi morala biti zlasti tesno povezana s trenutnimi kapitalskimi zahtevami institucije, ocena potrebne sposobnosti obnove kapitala pa bi morala biti tesno povezana z verjetnimi kapitalskimi zahtevami po uporabi strategije za reševanje, razen če obstajajo konkretni razlogi, zakaj bi bilo treba izgube v postopku reševanja obravnavati drugače kot v delujočem podjetju.
A similar assessment is necessary to ensure the MREL is sufficient to ensure resolvability of an institution when resolution tools other than bail-in are to be applied.
Podobna ocena je podobna za zagotavljanje, da minimalna zahteva glede kapitala zadostuje, da se zagotovi rešljivost institucije, kadar je treba uporabili druge instrumente za reševanje, ne samo reševanja s sredstvi upnikov.
Point (c) of Article 45(6) of Directive 2014/59/EU also requires that resolution authorities consider the possibility that certain classes of liabilities, identified in resolution plans and in the resolvability assessment, might be excluded from bail-in.
Točka (c) člena 45(6) Direktive 2014/59/EU zahteva tudi, da organi za reševanje preučijo možnost, da se lahko določeni razredi kvalificiranih obveznosti, opredeljeni v načrtu reševanja in v oceni rešljivosti, izključijo iz reševanje s sredstvi upnikov.
Liabilities of that kind should not be relied on for purposes of meeting the MREL.
Za izpolnjevanje minimalne zahteve glede kapitala se ne bi smelo zanašati na takšne obveznosti.
Resolution authorities should also ensure that, when significant amounts of any insolvency class of liabilities are excluded from bail-in on either a mandatory or discretionary basis, that exclusion would not result in liabilities of the same or a more senior class bearing greater losses than they would in insolvency, as this would be an impediment to resolvability.
Organi za reševanje bi morali zagotoviti tudi, da ta izključitev v primeru obvezne ali diskrecijske izključitve pomembnih zneskov obveznosti katerega koli razreda obveznosti, ki so v skladu z insolvenčnim pravom, iz reševanja s sredstvi upnikov ne bi povzročila, da bi obveznosti istega ali nadrejenega razreda prevzele višje izgube, kot bi jih v primeru insolventnosti, saj bi to oviralo rešljivost.
Resolution authorities may require part of the MREL referred to in Article 45(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU to be met by subordinated contractual bail-in instruments, or by setting a higher minimum requirement, or by alternative measures to address impediments to resolution.
Organi za reševanje lahko zahtevajo, da se del minimalne zahteve glede kapitala iz člena 45(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU izpolni s podrejenimi pogodbenimi instrumenti za reševanje s sredstvi upnikov ali z določitvijo višje minimalne zahteve ali z alternativnimi ukrepi za obravnavo ovir za reševanje.
If the risk of a breach of the ‘no creditor worse off’ safeguard is sufficiently low, no adjustment to the MREL is necessary.
Če je tveganje za kršenje zaščitnega ukrepa „noben upnik ne sme biti na slabšem“ dovolj nizko, prilagoditev minimalne zahteve glede kapitala ni potrebna.
Certain institutions subject to Directive 2014/59/EU, in particular financial market infrastructures which are also authorised as credit institutions, have highly specialised business models and are subject to additional regulations, which should be taken into account when setting MREL.
Določene institucije, za katere se uporablja Direktiva 2014/59/EU, zlasti infrastrukture finančnih trgov, ki imajo dovoljenje za poslovanje kot kreditne institucije, imajo visoko specializirane poslovne modele in zanje veljajo dodatni predpisi, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri določanju minimalne zahteve glede kapitala.
In order to ensure consistency with prudential supervision, the resolution authority's assessment of the size, business model, funding model, and risk profile of the institution should take into account outcomes of the supervisory review and evaluation process carried out by the competent authority pursuant to Article 97 of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] unless there are clear reasons why losses in resolution should be assessed differently than in going concern.
Za zagotavljanje skladnosti z bonitetnim nadzorom bi moral organ za reševanje v oceni velikosti, poslovnega modela, modela financiranja in profila tveganja institucije upoštevati rezultate postopka nadzorniškega pregledovanja in ovrednotenja, ki ga v skladu s členom 97 Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] opravi pristojni organ, razen če obstajajo konkretni razlogi, zakaj bi bilo treba izgube v postopku reševanja obravnavati drugače kot v delujočem podjetju.
When conducting the supervisory review and evaluation process and subject to Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], the competent authority should take into account the guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (EBA/GL/2014/13) issued by the EBA pursuant to Article 107(3) of that Directive by making every effort to comply with those guidelines in line with Article 16(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Pristojni organ bi pri izvajanju postopka nadzorniškega pregledovanja in vrednotenja ter ob upoštevanju člena 16 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] moral upoštevati smernice o skupnih postopkih in metodologijah za postopke nadzorniškega pregledovanja in ovrednotenja (EBA/GL/2014/13), ki jih je EBA izdala v skladu s členom 107(3) navedene direktive tako, da si prizadeva za skladnost z navedenimi smernicami v skladu s členom 16(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010.
Resolution plans may provide for arrangements for loss absorption and recapitalisation within group structures, including through capital instruments or eligible liabilities issued by institutions to other institutions or entities within the same group.
Načrt reševanja lahko določa sheme za pokritje izgub in dokapitalizacijo znotraj struktur skupine, vključno s kapitalskimi instrumenti ali kvalificiranimi obveznostmi, ki jih institucije izdajo drugim institucijam ali subjektom znotraj iste skupine.
Resolution authorities should set MREL consistently with those arrangements where they are integral to the institution or group's preferred resolution strategy.
Organi za reševanje bi morali minimalno zahtevo glede kapitala določiti v skladu z navedenimi shemami, če so te bistvene za preferenčno strategijo reševanja institucije ali skupine.