natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
V Bruslju, 4. avgusta 2017
Done at Brussels, 4 August 2017.
Za Komisijo
The President
UL L 171, 29.6.2016, str. 66.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1423
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1423
amending Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EU) 2016/44 o omejevalnih ukrepih zaradi razmer v Libiji
Annex V to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 lists vessels designated by the United Nations Sanctions Committee in accordance with paragraph 11 of United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2146 (2014).
V Prilogi V k Uredbi (EU) 2016/44 so navedena plovila, ki jih je Odbor Združenih narodov za sankcije uvrstil na seznam v skladu z odstavkom 11 Resolucije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 2146 (2014).
Those vessels are subject to a number of prohibitions under that Regulation, including the prohibition to load, transport or discharge crude oil from Libya and to access ports in the territory of the Union.
Za navedena plovila veljajo številne prepovedi v sladu z navedeno uredbo, vključno s prepovedjo natovarjanja, prevoza ali raztovarjanja surove nafte iz Libije ter prepovedjo dostopa do pristanišč na ozemlju Unije.
On 21 July 2017, the United Nations Security Council Committee added the vessel Capricorn to the list of vessels subject to restrictive measures.
Odbor Varnostnega sveta združenih narodov je 21. julija 2017 dodal plovilo Capricorn na seznam plovil, za katera veljajo omejevalni ukrepi.
Annex V to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga V k Uredbi Sveta (EU) 2016/44 se spremeni, kakor je določeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 4 August 2017.
V Bruslju, 4. avgusta 2017
34.
UL L 12, 19.1.2016, str.
OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p.
1.
ANNEX
Priloga V k Uredbi (EU) 2016/44 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Annex V to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is replaced by the following:
PRILOGA V
ANNEX V
SEZNAM PLOVIL IZ TOČKE (H) ČLENA 1 IN ČLENA 15 TER VELJAVNI UKREPI, KI JIH DOLOČI ODBOR ZA SANKCIJE
LIST OF VESSELS REFERRED TO IN POINT (H) OF ARTICLE 1 AND ARTICLE 15 AND APPLICABLE MEASURES AS SPECIFIED BY THE SANCTIONS COMMITTEE
Ime: CAPRICORN
Name: CAPRICORN
Plovilo je uvrščeno na seznam v skladu z odstavkoma 10(a) in 10(b) resolucije 2146 (2014), kakor je bila podaljšana in spremenjena z odstavkom 2 resolucije 2362 (2017) (prepoved natovarjanja, prevoza ali raztovarjanja; prepoved dostopa do pristanišč).
Listed pursuant to paragraphs 10(a) and 10 (b) of resolution 2146 (2014), as extended and modified by paragraph 2 of resolution 2362 (2017) (prohibition to load, transport or discharge; prohibition to enter ports).
V skladu z odstavkom 11 resolucije 2146 ta uvrstitev na seznam velja od 21. julija do 21. oktobra 2017, če je odbor prej ne razveljavi v skladu z odstavkom 12 resolucije 2146.
Pursuant to paragraph 11 of resolution 2146, this designation is valid from 21 July to 21 October 2017, unless terminated earlier by the Committee pursuant to paragraph 12 of resolution 2146.
Država zastave: Tanzanija
Flag State: Tanzania.
Dodatne informacije
supplementing Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the European Union trade mark and repealing Commission Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96
o dopolnitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 207/2009 o blagovni znamki Evropske unije in o razveljavitvi uredb Komisije (ES) št. 2868/95 in (ES) št. 216/96
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark [1], and in particular Article 42a, Article 43(3), Article 57a, Article 65a, Article 77(4), Article 78(6), Article 79(5), Article 79b(2), Article 79c(5), Article 80(3), Article 82a(3), Article 93a, Article 136b, Article 154a(3) and Article 156(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 207/2009 z dne 26. februarja 2009 o blagovni znamki Evropske unije [1] in zlasti členov 42a, 43(3), 57a, 65a, 77(4), 78(6), 79(5), 79b(2), 79c(5), 80(3), 82a(3), 93a, 136b, 154a(3) in 156(4) Uredbe,
Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 [2], which was codified as Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, created a system specific to the Union for the protection of trade marks to be obtained at the level of the Union on the basis of an application to the European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘the Office’).
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 40/94 [2], ki je bila kodificirana z Uredbo (ES) št. 207/2009, je bil uveden poseben sistem Unije, kjer se varstvo blagovne znamke na ravni Unije pridobi na podlagi prijave Uradu Evropske unije za intelektualno lastnino (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Urad).
Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] amending Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 aligns the powers conferred therein upon the Commission to Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Uredba (EU) 2015/2424 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 usklajuje pooblastila, ki se v navedeni Uredbi prenesejo na Komisijo, s členoma 290 in 291 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
In order to conform with the new legal framework resulting from that alignment, certain rules should be adopted by means of implementing and delegated acts.
Da se zagotovi skladnost z novim pravnim okvirom, ki je posledica navedene uskladitve, bi bilo treba z delegiranimi in izvedbenimi akti sprejeti nekatera pravila.
The new rules should be applied instead of the existing rules which are laid down in Commission Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 [4] and (EC) No 216/96 [5] and aim at implementing Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Namesto obstoječih pravil, ki so za namene izvajanja Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 določena v uredbah Komisije (ES) št. 2868/95 [4] in (ES) št. 216/96 [5], bi bilo treba uporabljati nova pravila.
Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96 should therefore be repealed.
Uredbi (ES) št. 2868/95 in (ES) št. 216/96 bi zato bilo treba razveljaviti.
The procedural rules on opposition should ensure an effective, efficient and expeditious examination and registration of EU trade mark applications by the Office using a procedure which is transparent, thorough, fair and equitable.
Postopkovna pravila, ki urejajo ugovor, bi morala Uradu s postopkom, ki je pregleden, temeljit, pošten in pravičen, zagotavljati uspešnost, učinkovitost in hitrost pri preizkušanju ter registraciji prijav blagovnih znamk EU.
In order to enhance legal certainty and clarity, those opposition rules should take account of the extended relative grounds for refusal laid down in Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, in particular as regards the requirements for admissibility and substantiation of opposition proceedings, and be adjusted to better reflect the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and to codify the practice of the Office.
Da se izboljša pravna varnost in jasnost, bi morala navedena pravila, ki urejajo ugovor, upoštevati razširjene relativne razloge za zavrnitev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009, zlasti v zvezi z zahtevami glede dopustnosti in utemeljitve postopka z ugovorom, ter se prilagoditi tako, da bolje odražajo sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije in kodificirajo prakso Urada.
In order to allow for a more flexible, consistent and modern trade mark system in the Union, while ensuring legal certainty, it is appropriate to reduce the administrative burden for the parties in inter-partes proceedings by relaxing the requirements for the substantiation of earlier rights in cases where the content of the relevant evidence is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, as well as the requirement of submitting evidence in the language of the proceedings.
Da se skupaj s pravno varnostjo omogoči prožnejši, skladnejši in sodobnejši sistem blagovnih znamk v Uniji, je primerno zmanjšati upravno breme strank v postopkih inter partes tako, da se omilijo pogoji glede utemeljitve prejšnjih pravic, če je vsebina zadevnih dokazil dostopna prek spletnega vira, ki ga priznava Urad, ter zahteve za predložitev dokazil v jeziku postopka.
In the interest of clarity and legal certainty, it is important to specify the requirements for amending an application for an EU trade mark in a clear and exhaustive manner.
Zaradi jasnosti in pravne varnosti je pomembno jasno in izčrpno opredeliti zahteve za spremembo prijave blagovne znamke EU.
The procedural rules governing the revocation and declaration of invalidity of an EU trade mark should ensure that an EU trade mark can be revoked or declared invalid in an effective and efficient way by means of transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedures.
Postopkovna pravila, ki urejajo razveljavitev in razglasitev ničnosti znamk EU, bi morala zagotoviti pregleden, temeljit, pošten in pravičen postopek, s katerim je znamko EU mogoče razveljaviti ali razglasiti za nično na uspešen in učinkovit način.
For the sake of greater clarity, consistency as well as efficiency and legal certainty, the procedural rules governing the revocation and declaration of invalidity of an EU trade mark should be aligned with those applicable to opposition proceedings, retaining only those differences which are required due to the specific nature of revocation and declaration of invalidity proceedings.
Zaradi boljše jasnosti, skladnosti, učinkovitosti in pravne varnosti bi morala biti postopkovna pravila, ki urejajo razveljavitev in razglasitev ničnosti znamk EU, usklajena s pravili, ki veljajo za postopke z ugovorom, ohraniti pa bi bilo treba le tiste razlike, ki so potrebne zaradi posebne narave postopkov za razveljavitev oziroma ugotovitev ničnosti.
Furthermore, requests for assignment of an EU trade mark registered in the name of an unauthorised agent should follow the same procedural path as invalidity proceedings, serving in practice as an alternative to invalidating the mark.
Poleg tega bi morale zahteve za prenos znamke EU, ki je registrirana v imenu nepooblaščenega posrednika, potekati enako kot postopki za ugotovitev ničnosti, saj v praksi služijo kot nadomestno sredstvo za ugotavljanje ničnosti znamke.
According to settled case-law of the Court of Justice [6], unless otherwise provided, the Office enjoys discretionary powers when examining belated evidence, submitted for the purpose of either substantiating an opposition or proving genuine use of the earlier mark in the context of opposition or invalidity proceedings.
Urad ima v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča [6], razen če je določeno drugače, v postopkih z ugovorom oziroma za ugotovitev ničnosti diskrecijske pravice pri preverjanju dokazil, predloženih z zamudo, katerih namen je utemeljitev ugovora ali dokazovanje resne in dejanske uporabe prejšnje znamke.
In order to ensure legal certainty the relevant boundaries of such discretion should be accurately reflected in the rules governing opposition proceedings or proceedings for the declaration of invalidity of EU trade marks.
Zaradi zagotavljanja pravne varnosti bi se morale zadevne omejitve te diskrecije točno odražati v pravilih, ki urejajo postopke z ugovorom oziroma za ugotovitev ničnosti znamk EU.
In order to allow for an effective, efficient and, within the scope of the appeal defined by the parties, complete review of decisions taken by the Office in the first instance by means of a transparent, thorough, fair and impartial appeal procedure suited to the specific nature of intellectual property law and taking into account the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, it is appropriate to reinforce legal certainty and predictability by clarifying and specifying the procedural rules and the parties' procedural guarantees, in particular where a defendant makes use of the right to file a cross appeal.
Da se omogoči uspešna, učinkovita in – znotraj obsega pritožbe, kot jo določata stranki – celovita revizija odločb, ki jih je na prvi stopnji sprejel Urad po temeljitem, poštenem, pravičnem in nepristranskem pritožbenem postopku, prilagojenem posebni naravi prava intelektualne lastnine in načelom iz Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009, je zaradi večje pravne varnosti in predvidljivosti ustrezno pojasniti in opredeliti postopkovna pravila ter procesna jamstva strank, zlasti če tožena stranka uveljavlja pravico do nasprotne pritožbe.
In order to ensure an effective and efficient organisation of the Boards of Appeal, the President, the chairpersons and the members of the Boards of Appeal should, in the exercise of their respective functions conferred upon them by Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and by this Regulation, be required to ensure a high quality and consistency of the decisions taken independently by the Boards on appeal as well as the efficiency of the appeal proceedings.
Predsednik, predsedujoči posameznim odborom in člani odborov za pritožbe bi morali biti pri opravljanju svojih nalog iz Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 in te uredbe obvezani, da skupaj z visoko stopnjo kakovosti in skladnosti odločb, ki jih posamično sprejemajo odbori za pritožbe, zagotavljajo tudi učinkovitost pritožbenih postopkov in tako omogočijo uspešno in učinkovito organizacijo odborov za pritožbe.
In order to ensure the independence of the President, the chairpersons and the members of the Boards of Appeal as provided in Article 136 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the Management Board should take the latter Article into account when adopting appropriate implementing rules to give effect to the Staff Regulations and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants in accordance with Article 110 of the Staff Regulations.
Za zagotovitev neodvisnosti predsednika, predsedujočih in članov odborov za pritožbe, kot je določeno v členu 136 Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009, bi moral upravni odbor navedeni člen upoštevati pri sprejemanju ustreznih izvedbenih pravil za uveljavitev kadrovskih predpisov in pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev v skladu s členom 110 Kadrovskih predpisov.
In order to enhance the transparency and predictability of the appeal proceedings, the rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal currently laid down in Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96, should be set out in a single text and properly interlinked with the procedural rules applicable to the instances of the Office whose decisions are subject to appeals.
Da se okrepi preglednost in predvidljivost pritožbenih postopkov, bi se moral sedanji poslovnik odborov za pritožbe iz Uredb (ES) št. 2868/95 in (ES) št. 216/96 opredeliti v enem samem besedilu in primerno povezati s postopkovnimi pravili, ki veljajo za organe Urada, katerega odločbe so lahko predmeti pritožb.
For the sake of clarity and legal certainty, it is required to codify and clarify certain procedural rules governing oral proceedings, in particular relating to the language of such proceedings.
Zaradi jasnosti in pravne varnosti je treba kodificirati in razjasniti nekatera postopkovna pravila, ki urejajo ustne postopke, zlasti v zvezi z jezikom tovrstnih postopkov.
It is further appropriate to provide greater efficiency and flexibility by introducing the possibility of taking part in oral proceedings by technical means and of substituting the minutes of oral proceedings by their recording.
Nadalje je ustrezno uvesti možnost sodelovanja pri ustnem postopku s pomočjo tehničnih sredstev in nadomeščanja zapisnikov ustnih postopkov z njihovimi posnetki ter s tem zagotoviti večjo učinkovitost in prožnost.
In order to further streamline proceedings and render them more consistent, it is appropriate to set out the basic structure and format of evidence to be submitted to the Office in all proceedings, as well as the consequences of not submitting evidence in accordance with that structure and format.
Da se postopki še dodatno poenostavijo in uskladijo, je ustrezno določiti osnovno strukturo in format dokazil, ki se v vseh postopkih predložijo Uradu, ter posledice predložitve dokazil, ki ne bodo v skladu s to strukturo in formatom.
In order to modernise the trade mark system in the Union by adapting it to the internet era, it is further appropriate to provide for a definition of ‘electronic means’ in the context of notifications and for forms of notification that are not obsolete.
Da se sistem blagovnih znamk Unije posodobi oziroma prilagodi dobi interneta, je nadalje v kontekstu obveščanja ustrezno zagotoviti tudi opredelitev pojma „elektronska sredstva“ ter oblike obveščanja, ki niso zastarele.
In the interest of efficiency, transparency and user-friendliness, the Office should make available standard forms in all the official languages of the Office for communication in proceedings before the Office, which may be completed online.
Urad bi moral za namene komunikacije v postopkih pred Uradom omogočiti dostop do standardnih obrazcev, ki se lahko izpolnijo prek spleta, v vseh uradnih jezikih Urada, da se tako zagotovi učinkovitost, preglednost in prijaznost do uporabnika.
For the purposes of greater clarity, consistency and efficiency, a provision on the suspension of opposition, revocation, invalidity and appeal proceedings should be introduced, laying down also the maximum duration of a suspension requested by both parties.
Zaradi izboljšanja jasnosti, skladnosti in učinkovitosti, bi bilo treba uvesti določbo o prekinitvi postopka z ugovorom oziroma postopka za razveljavitev, ugotovitev ničnosti ali pritožbenega postopka ter obenem določiti najdaljše možno obdobje prekinitve, ki jo zahtevata obe stranki.
The rules governing the calculation and duration of time limits, the procedures for the revocation of a decision or for cancellation of an entry in the Register, the detailed arrangements for the resumption of proceedings, and the details on representation before the Office need to ensure a smooth, effective and efficient operation of the EU trade mark system.
Pravila, ki urejajo izračun in trajanje časovnih rokov, postopki za razveljavitev odločbe ali izbris vpisa iz registra, podrobne ureditve za nadaljevanje postopka in podrobnosti o zastopništvu pred Uradom morajo zagotoviti nemoteno, uspešno in učinkovito delovanje sistema blagovnih znamk EU.
It is necessary to ensure the effective and efficient registration of international trade marks in a manner that is fully consistent with the rules of the Protocol relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks.
Treba je zagotoviti uspešno in učinkovito registracijo mednarodnih znamk na način, ki je povsem skladen s pravili protokola k Madridskemu sporazumu o mednarodnem registriranju znamk.
It is therefore necessary to defer the applicability of those rules until the same date.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Notwithstanding the repeal of Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96, it is necessary to continue to apply specific provisions of those Regulations to certain proceedings that had been initiated before the abovementioned date until the conclusion of those proceedings,
NASLOV I
Subject matter
podrobnosti postopka za vložitev in preizkus ugovora zoper registracijo blagovne znamke EU pri Uradu Evropske unije za intelektualno lastnino (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Urad);
This Regulation lays down rules specifying:
podrobnosti postopka, ki ureja spremembe prijave blagovne znamke EU;
the details of the procedure for filing and examining an opposition to the registration of an EU trade mark at the European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘the Office’);
podrobnosti, ki urejajo razveljavitev in razglasitev ničnosti blagovne znamke EU ter prenos blagovne znamke EU, registrirane v imenu nepooblaščenega posrednika;
the details of the procedure governing the amendment of an application for an EU trade mark;
formalne vsebine pritožb in postopka za vložitev ter preizkus pritožb, formalne vsebine in oblike odločb odborov za pritožbe ter povračila pristojbin za pritožbo, podrobnosti o organizaciji odborov za pritožbe ter pogoje, pod katerimi izda odločbe o pritožbah en sam član;
the details governing the revocation and declaration of invalidity of an EU trade mark, as well as the transfer of an EU trade mark registered in the name of an unauthorised agent;
podrobnosti ureditev za ustne postopke in za pridobivanje dokazov;
the formal content of a notice of appeal and the procedure for the filing and the examination of an appeal, the formal content and form of the Boards of Appeal's decisions and the reimbursement of the appeal fee, the details concerning the organisation of the Boards of Appeal, and the conditions under which decisions on appeals are to be taken by a single member;
podrobnosti ureditev za obveščanje Urada in pravila o sredstvih za komunikacijo z Uradom;
the detailed arrangements for oral proceedings and for the taking of evidence;
podrobnosti o izračunu in trajanju časovnih rokov;
the detailed arrangements for notification by the Office and the rules on the means of communication with the Office;
postopka za razveljavitev odločbe ali za izbris vpisa iz registra blagovnih znamk EU;
the details regarding the calculation and duration of time limits;
podrobnosti ureditev za nadaljevanje postopka pred Uradom;
the procedure for the revocation of a decision or for the cancellation of an entry in the Register of EU trade marks;
pogojev in postopka za imenovanje skupnega zastopnika, pogojev, pod katerimi zaposleni in poklicni zastopniki vložijo pooblastilo, vsebine tega pooblastila ter okoliščin, v katerih je mogoče osebo odstraniti s seznama dovoljenih poklicnih zastopnikov;
the detailed arrangements for the resumption of proceedings before the Office;
podrobnosti postopka za mednarodne registracije na podlagi osnovne prijave ali osnovne registracije v zvezi s kolektivno, certifikacijsko ali garancijsko znamko ter postopka za vložitev in preizkus ugovora zoper mednarodno registracijo.
the conditions and the procedure for the appointment of a common representative, the conditions under which employees and professional representatives shall file an authorisation, and the content of that authorisation, and the circumstances in which a person may be removed from the list of admitted professional representatives;
NASLOV II
the details of the procedure concerning international registrations based on a basic application or basic registration relating to a collective mark, certification mark or guarantee mark, and the procedure for the filing and examination of an opposition to an international registration.
POSTOPEK UGOVORA IN DOKAZ O UPORABI
PROCEDURE FOR OPPOSITION AND PROOF OF USE
Obvestilo o ugovoru
Article 2
Obvestilo o ugovoru se lahko vloži na podlagi ene ali več prejšnjih znamk ali drugih pravic iz člena 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 pod pogojem, da so imetniki ali pooblaščene osebe, ki v skladu s členom 41 Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 ugovor vlagajo, upravičeni, da v zvezi s prejšnjimi znamkami in pravicami tako ravnajo.
Notice of opposition
Če ima prejšnja znamka več kot enega imetnika (solastništvo) oziroma če prejšnjo pravico lahko uveljavlja več kot ena oseba, lahko v skladu s členom 41 Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 ugovor vloži kateri koli ali vsi imetniki oziroma pooblaščene osebe.
A notice of opposition may be entered on the basis of one or more earlier marks or other rights within the meaning of Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, provided that the proprietors or authorised persons entering the notice pursuant to Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 are entitled to do so for all the earlier marks or rights.
Obvestilo o ugovoru vsebuje:
Where an earlier mark has more than one proprietor (co-ownership) or where an earlier right may be exercised by more than one person, an opposition pursuant to Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 may be filed by any or all of the proprietors or authorised persons.
številko spisa prijave, zoper katero se vlaga ugovor, in ime prijavitelja blagovne znamke EU;
The notice of opposition shall contain:
jasno navedbo prejšnje znamke ali pravice, na kateri temelji ugovor, in sicer: