natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
it is satisfied that the third country operator has established:
se prepriča, da je operator iz tretje države:
compliance with the applicable requirements of Part-TCO;
vzpostavil skladnost z veljavnimi zahtevami iz dela TCO;
transparent, adequate and timely communication in response to a further assessment and/or an audit of the Agency, if applicable; and
zagotovil pregledno, ustrezno in pravočasno komunikacijo v odgovor na nadaljnje ocenjevanje in/ali revizijo, ki ga/jo izvaja agencija, če je potrebno, in
a timely and successful corrective action submitted in response to an identified non-compliance, if any;
v odgovor na morebitno ugotovljeno neskladnost predložil pravočasen in uspešen korektivni ukrep;
there is no evidence of major deficiencies in the ability of the State of the operator or the State of registry, as applicable, to certify and oversee the operator and/or aircraft in accordance with the applicable ICAO standards; and
ni nobenih dokazov o večjih pomanjkljivostih pri sposobnosti države operatorja oziroma države registracije, da potrdi in nadzoruje operatorja in/ali zrakoplov v skladu z veljavnimi standardi ICAO, in
the applicant not being subject to an operating ban pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.’;
za vložnika ne velja prepoved opravljanja letov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2111/2005.“
Appendices I and II are deleted.
Dodatka I in II se črtata.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1159
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1159
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China and produced by Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz natrijevega ciklamata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki ga proizvajata družbi Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited in Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9(4) Uredbe,
Following an anti-dumping investigation under Article 5 of ‘the basic Regulation’, by Regulation (EC) No 435/2004 [2], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’) and Indonesia.
Svet je po protidampinški preiskavi v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 435/2004 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz natrijevega ciklamata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in Indonezije.
Since then, these measures were first extended for an additional period of five years in June 2010 [3], and, in May 2012 following a partial interim review, the duty level of one Chinese exporting producer was amended [4].
Od takrat so se ti ukrepi junija 2010 prvič podaljšali za obdobje nadaljnjih pet let [3], maja 2012 po delnem vmesnem pregledu pa je bila spremenjena stopnja dajatve enega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika [4].
As a result, the rate of the duty applicable for Indonesia ranged from 0,24 EUR/kg to 0,27 EUR/kg, and for the PRC from 0,23 EUR/kg to 0,26 EUR/kg (‘the measures in force’).
Na podlagi tega se je stopnja dajatve, ki se je uporabljala za Indonezijo, gibala med 0,24 EUR/kg in 0,27 EUR/kg, za LRK pa med 0,23 EUR/kg in 0,26 EUR/kg („veljavni ukrepi“).
The measures in force applied to all imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the PRC and Indonesia, with the exception of imports of sodium cyclamate produced by the Chinese exporting producers Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited.
Veljavni ukrepi se uporabljajo za ves uvoz natrijevega ciklamata s poreklom iz LRK in Indonezije, razen za uvoz natrijevega ciklamata, ki ga proizvajata kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited in Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited.
A zero duty rate was originally determined for these companies, as no dumping was found (Regulation (EC) No 435/2004).
Za ti družbi je bila prvotno določena ničelna stopnja dajatve, saj zanju ni bil ugotovljen damping (Uredba (ES) št. 435/2004).
In line with the WTO Appellate Body report in case Mexico — Definitive Anti-dumping Measures on Beef and Rice (‘the WTO Appellate Body report’) [5], the Chinese exporting producers Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited were not examined in the subsequent reviews of the measures as imposed by Regulation (EC) No 435/2004 and are not subject to the measures in force.
V skladu s poročilom pritožbenega organa STO v zadevi Mehika – dokončni protidampinški ukrepi za goveje meso in riž („poročilo pritožbenega organa STO“) [5] se kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited in Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited nista proučila v okviru poznejših pregledov ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 435/2004, in veljavni ukrepi se v zvezi z njima ne uporabljajo.
Following a withdrawal of the complaint, the proceeding was terminated by Commission decision of 5 April 2012 [7] without imposing measures.
Začetek preiskave
A second expiry review of the measures in force was initiated in June 2015 [8] under Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 12. avgusta 2015 začela protidampinško preiskavo v zvezi z uvozom natrijevega ciklamata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) v Unijo, omejeno na Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited in Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited, tj. dve družbi, ki pripadata isti skupini (obe družbi se skupaj navajata kot „zadevna proizvajalca izvoznika“ ali „Fang Da“), na podlagi člena 5 osnovne uredbe.
Initiation of the investigation
Obvestilo o začetku („obvestilo o začetku“) je bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [9].
On 12 August 2015, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated an anti-dumping investigation with regard to imports into the Union of sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’), limited to Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited, two companies belonging to the same group (both companies referred to as ‘the exporting producers concerned’ or ‘Fang Da’), on the basis of Article 5 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je začela preiskavo na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 30. junija 2015 vložila družba Productos Aditivos S.A. („pritožnik“ ali „proizvajalec Unije“), ki je edini proizvajalec natrijevega ciklamata v Uniji in zato predstavlja 100 % celotne proizvodnje v Uniji.
A Notice of Initiation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [9] (‘the Notice of Initiation’).
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu in znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za začetek preiskave.
The Commission initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged on 30 June 2015 by Productos Aditivos S.A. (‘the complainant’ or ‘the Union producer’), the sole producer of sodium cyclamate in the Union, thus representing 100 % of the total Union production.
Družbi Fang Da sta po razkritju navedli, da so dokazi o škodi, vključeni v pritožbi, pomanjkljivi in da je uvedba več zaporednih preiskav zoper družbi Fang Da zloraba.
The complaint contained evidence of dumping and of resulting material injury that was sufficient to justify the initiation of the investigation.
Navedli sta tudi, da v skladu s tem začetek sedanje zadeve iz člena 5 osnovne uredbe ni primeren.
Following disclosure, Fang Da claimed that the evidence on injury contained in the complaint was deficient, and that the opening of one investigation after another against Fang Da was abusive.
Poleg tega sta v javnih dokumentih poskušali najti pojasnitev gibanj nekaterih kazalnikov.
It also stated that this illustrates that the initiation of the present case under Article 5 of the basic Regulation is not appropriate.
Kot je že pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 8, Komisija meni, da je pritožba vključevala dovolj dokazov za utemeljitev začetka preiskave, kar je samo po sebi merilo za sklep o začetku, in ne obstoj ali rezultati prejšnjih preiskav.
They also sought clarification of the trends of certain indicators in the open file.
Posebna analiza škode v okviru pritožbe je dejansko pokazala, da je dovolj dokazov o znatnem prodoru uvoza družb Fang Da na trg EU po cenah, ki močno nelojalno nižajo prodajne cene industrije Unije.
As already explained in recital (8), the Commission considers that the complaint contained sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of the investigation which alone is the criterion for the decision on the initiation, not the existence or outcome of past investigations.
Poleg tega za ugotovitev znatne škode ni potrebno, da vsi dejavniki kažejo poslabšanje.
In fact, the specific injury analysis of the complaint has shown that there is sufficient evidence pointing to a significant penetration of the EU market by imports from Fang Da made at prices which substantially undercut and undersell the Union industry's own prices.
Prav tako obstoj drugih dejavnikov, ki morda vplivajo na položaj industrije Unije, ne pomeni nujno, da vpliv dampinškega uvoza na to industrijo ni znaten.
In addition, not all factors must show deterioration in order for material injury to be established.
V skladu s tem je začetek preiskave zakonsko veljaven.
Furthermore, the existence of other factors which may have an impact on the situation of the Union industry does not necessarily imply that the effect of dumped imports on this industry is not material.
V zvezi s pripombami o možni neskladnosti treh kazalnikov v javni dokumentaciji je to neskladnost mogoče pojasniti z znatno razliko v obsegu, vključenem v te izračune, in z rezultatom zaokroženja uporabljenih zaupnih zneskov (navzgor ali navzdol, odvisno od leta).
Accordingly, the initiation of the investigation is legally valid.
Prav tako je bilo zakonsko mogoče začeti preiskavo v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe v zvezi z le eno družbo, kot potrjuje sodna praksa [10].
Regarding the comments on the possible inconsistency of three indicators in the open file, it is explained by the substantial difference in magnitude of the volumes involved in these calculations and the result of the rounding of the confidential figures used (upward or downward, depending of the year).
Naknadni postopek
It was also legally possible to initiate the investigation under Article 5 of the basic Regulation even if it concerned one company, as confirmed by case-law [10].
Komisija med to preiskavo ni uvedla začasnih protidampinških ukrepov, da bi časovno uskladila dokončne ugotovitve v okviru tega postopka in pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa iz uvodne izjave 6.
Subsequent procedure
Zainteresirane strani
The Commission did not impose provisional anti-dumping measures in this investigation in order to align the timing of the definitive findings of this proceeding with the expiry review mentioned in recital (6).
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj se ji javijo, če želijo sodelovati v preiskavi.
Interested parties
Poleg tega je o začetku preiskave posebej obvestila pritožnika, zadevna proizvajalca izvoznika in kitajske organe, znane uvoznike, dobavitelje, uporabnike in trgovce, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter jih pozvala k sodelovanju.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the complainant, the two exporting producers concerned and the Chinese authorities, known importers, suppliers, users and traders known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.
Proizvajalci iz primerljive države
Interested parties had an opportunity to comment on the initiation of the investigation and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Komisija je o začetku obvestila tudi proizvajalce v Indoneziji in jih povabila k sodelovanju.
Analogue country producers
V obvestilu o začetku je Komisija obvestila zainteresirane strani, da namerava uporabiti Indonezijo kot tretjo državo s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“) v smislu člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission also informed producers in Indonesia about the initiation and invited them to participate.
V dokumentaciji ni nobenih dokazov o morebitni proizvodnji natrijevega ciklamata v drugih tretjih državah.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged Indonesia as a third market economy country (‘analogue country’) within the meaning of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Vzorčenje
There were no indications on the file pointing towards possible production of sodium cyclamate in other third countries.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo morda izbrala vzorec zadevnih uvoznikov v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
Sampling
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je nepovezane uvoznike pozvala, naj zagotovijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample importers concerned in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Trije nepovezani uvozniki so predložili zahtevane informacije in se strinjali z vključitvijo v vzorec.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Zaradi majhnega števila uvoznikov se je Komisija odločila, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
Three unrelated importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Obrazci zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“)
In view of the low number of the importers, the Commission decided that sampling was not necessary.
Komisija je za namene člena 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe zadevnima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma v LRK poslala obrazce zahtevkov za TGO.
Market economy treatment (‘MET’) claim forms
Izpolnjeni vprašalniki
For the purposes of Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, the Commission sent MET claim forms to the two exporting producers concerned in the PRC.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike edinemu proizvajalcu Unije, zadevnima kitajskima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma in trem nepovezanim uvoznikom.
Replies to the questionnaire
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so predložili edini proizvajalec Unije, eden od zadevnih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov (vključno z dvema njegovima povezanima uradoma za izvoz v Hongkongu) in dva nepovezana uvoznika.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the sole Union producer, the two Chinese exporting producers concerned and the three unrelated importers.
Drugi zadevni kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je prenehal proizvajati in prodajati zadevni izdelek pred obdobjem preiskave, zato ga vprašalnik v zvezi z obdobjem preiskave ni zadeval.
Questionnaire replies were received from the sole Union producer, one of the two Chinese exporting producers concerned (including two of its related export sales offices in Hong Kong) and from two unrelated importers.
Preveritveni obiski
The second Chinese exporting producer concerned had stopped production and sales of the product concerned prior to the investigation period, and was therefore not concerned by the questionnaire for the investigation period.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za ugotavljanje dampinga, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
Verification visits
Preveritveni obiski na podlagi člena 16 osnovne uredbe so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih družb:
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
proizvajalec Unije
Verification visits pursuant to Article 16 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Productos Aditivos S.A., Barcelona, Španija
Union producer
uvoznika
Productos Aditivos S.A., Barcelona, Spain
DKSH GmbH, Hamburg, Nemčija
Importers
Emilio Peña S.A., Torrente (Valencija), Španija
DKSH GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK
Emilio Peña S.A., Torrente (Valencia), Spain
Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited, Yang Quan, LRK
Exporting producers in the PRC
urad za izvoz (povezan z družbama Fang Da) v Hongkongu
Export sales office (related to Fang Da) in Hong Kong
Obdobje preiskave in obravnavano obdobje
Zhong Hua Fang Da Ltd., Hong Kong
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajemala obdobje od 1. aprila 2014 do 31. marca 2015 („obdobje preiskave“).
Investigation period and period considered
Proučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015 (‘the investigation period’).
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2011 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Zadevni izdelek
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Zadevni izdelek je natrijev ciklamat s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki ga proizvajata zadevna proizvajalca izvoznika in je trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN ex29299000 (oznaka TARIC 2929900010) („zadevni izdelek“).
Product concerned
Natrijev ciklamat je izdelek, ki se uporablja kot živilski aditiv, živilska industrija in proizvajalci nizkokaloričnih in dietetičnih namiznih sladil pa ga na splošno uporabljajo kot sladilo.
The product concerned is sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China and produced by the two exporting producers concerned, currently falling within CN code ex29299000 (TARIC code 2929900010) (‘the product concerned’).
Majhne količine se uporabljajo tudi v farmacevtski industriji.
Sodium cyclamate is a commodity product used as a food additive and is widely used as a sweetener by the food industry, as well as by the producers of low-caloric and dietetic table-top sweeteners.
Natrijev ciklamat je kemično čista snov.
Small volumes are also used by the pharmaceutical industry.
Vendar tako kot vsaka čista kemikalija lahko vsebuje majhen delež nečistoč v količinah mg/kg izdelka.
Sodium cyclamate is a chemically pure substance.
Vsebnost nečistoč, ki jo določa zakonodaja Unije, opredeljuje kakovost natrijevega ciklamata.
However, as is the case for any pure chemical, it may contain a small proportion of impurities in amounts of mg/kg of the product.
Natrijev ciklamat se pojavlja v dveh različnih oblikah: hidriran (HC) s 15 % vlage in brezvodni (AC) z vsebnostjo vlage do 1 %.
The content of the impurities, determined by the Union legislation, defines the quality of sodium cyclamate.
Ti obliki natrijevega ciklamata imata enake glavne značilnosti in uporabe.
Sodium cyclamate can be found in two different forms: hydrated (HC), with 15 % of moisture; and anhydrous (AC), with a content of up to 1 % of moisture.
Razlikujeta se le po sladkosti, pri čemer je vrsta HC manj sladka zaradi vsebnosti vode.
These two forms of sodium cyclamate have the same main characteristics and uses; it only varies in degree of sweetness; the HC type is less sweet due to the water content.
Iz istega razloga se razlikujeta tudi ceni.
Prices vary due to the same reason.
Natrijev ciklamat v obliki AC je dražji kot v obliki HC.
The AC type is more expensive than the HC form.
Zato bi bilo treba za namene tega postopka obe obliki obravnavati kot en izdelek.
Both forms should be therefore considered as one product for the purposes of this proceeding.
Podobni izdelek
the product concerned;
izdelek, ki ga proizvajalec izvoznik proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Ljudske republike Kitajske,
the product produced and sold by the exporting producer on the domestic market of the People's Republic of China;
izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije.
the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da so navedeni izdelki podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission therefore concluded that those products are like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
DAMPING
DUMPING
Uvodne opombe
One of the exporting producers concerned, Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited, ceased production of the product concerned in 2012.
Tako je analiza dampinga temeljila na podatkih, ki jih je predložila družba Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan).
Therefore, only Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited submitted a MET claim form and a questionnaire reply.
Vendar se ob upoštevanju razmerja med družbama, ki spadata v skupino Fang Da in sta v lasti iste matične družbe, ugotovitve uporabljajo za obe družbi, ki sestavljata skupino Fang Da.
Officials of the Commission visited Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited to verify that the company had ceased production and sales of the product concerned, which was indeed found to be so.
Tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“)
Therefore, the dumping analysis was based on the data submitted by Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan).
Komisija je ocenila zahtevek proizvajalca izvoznika za TGO in v njegovih prostorih izvedla preveritveni obisk.
However, seen the relation between the two companies, belonging to the Fang Da group and owned by the same parent company, the findings are applicable to both companies, which constitute the Fang Da group.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se normalna vrednost v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce izvoznike, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Market Economy Treatment (‘MET’)
Pri preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je zahteval TGO, ni dokazal, da izpolnjuje vsa merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission assessed the MET claim of the exporting producer and also carried out a verification visit at its premises.
Natančneje, ugotovljeno je bilo neizpolnjevanje drugega merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, saj se računovodske transakcije niso knjižile na podlagi obračunskega načela.
In accordance with Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those exporting producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega se ni pošteno predstavil finančni položaj družbe.
The investigation established that the exporting producer claiming MET failed to demonstrate that it fulfilled all of the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je opredelila tudi težavo v zvezi z računovodsko obravnavo nepremičnine, naprave in opreme.
More specifically, it was established that the second criteria as laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation was not met, as the accounting transactions were not recorded on an accrual basis.
Ugotovila je tudi, da se za nekatere izdatke niso priznale nobene določbe.
In addition, there was no fair presentation of the company's financial position.
Nazadnje je ugotovila, da se nobeni računovodski izkazi niso konsolidirali na ustrezni (matični) ravni.
The Commission also identified an issue with the accounting treatment for property, plant and equipment.
Komisija je proizvajalcu izvozniku, organom zadevne države in industriji Unije razkrila ugotovitve o TGO.
Moreover, it was established that no provisions were recognised for certain expenses.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da predložijo pripombe na ugotovitve in zahtevajo zaslišanje pred Komisijo in/ali pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih.
Finally, it was found that no consolidation of financial statements was made at the correct (parent) level.
Po razkritju je zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik predložil pripombe, v katerih je ugovarjal vsem navedenim ugotovitvam.