natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Section C of the Annex to Directive 2014/59/EU specifies a number of matters which must be considered in assessing the resolvability of an institution or group, but is not exhaustive and requires further specification.
Oddelek C Priloge k Direktivi 2014/59/EU določa številne elemente, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri ocenjevanju rešljivosti institucije ali skupine, vendar ni izčrpen, zato so potrebne dodatne podrobnosti.
Pursuant to Article 32 of Directive 2014/59/EU, resolution action should only be taken when winding up an institution or group under normal insolvency proceedings would not be in the public interest, and therefore the assessment of resolvability should consider such winding up as an alternative to resolution action.
V skladu s členom 32 Direktive 2014/59/EU bi bilo treba ukrep za reševanje sprejeti samo, kadar prenehanje institucije ali skupine v okviru običajnih insolvenčnih postopkov ne bi bilo v javnem interesu, zato bi ocena rešljivosti takšno prenehanje morala obravnavati kot alternativo ukrepom za reševanje.
Article 23(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU sets out various conditions which must be fulfilled to permit a parent institution, a Union parent institution and certain other entities in a group and their subsidiaries in other Member States or third countries that are institutions or financial institutions, on the basis of a group financial support agreement provided in Chapter III of that Directive, to provide financial support in the form of a loan, of provision of guarantees or of assets for use as collateral to another group entity that meets the conditions for early intervention.
Člen 23(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU določa več pogojev, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni, da lahko nadrejena družba, nadrejena družba v Uniji ter določeni drugi subjekti v skupini in njihove podrejene družbe v drugih državah članicah ali tretjih državah, ki so institucije ali finančne institucije, na podlagi sporazuma o finančni podpori v skupini, določenega v poglavju III navedene direktive, zagotovi finančno podporo v obliki posojila, zagotovitve jamstev ali zagotovitve sredstev za zavarovanje s premoženjem drugemu subjektu v skupini, ki izpolnjuje pogoje za zgodnje posredovanje.
Pursuant to Article 25(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU, the competent authority of the group entity providing the support may prohibit or restrict the provision of the financial support.
V skladu s členom 25(2) Direktive 2014/59/EU lahko pristojni organ subjekta v skupini, ki nudi podporo, prepove ali omeji zagotovitev finančne podpore.
Having regard to the financial difficulties of the receiving entity and the condition that there must be a reasonable prospect that the financial support redresses these financial difficulties, a thorough analysis of capital and liquidity needs of the receiving entity and an analysis of the internal and external causes for the financial difficulties and of past, present and expected market conditions should be undertaken.
Ob upoštevanju finančnih težav prejemnika podpore in pogoja, da se mora upravičeno pričakovati, da bo finančna podpora bistveno ublažila finančne težave, je treba opraviti natančno analizo kapitalskih in likvidnostnih potreb prejemnika podpore ter analizo zunanjih in notranjih vzrokov za finančne težave ter preteklih, sedanjih in pričakovanih tržnih razmer.
This analysis should include measures planned for addressing the causes of the distress of the receiving entity which can efficiently support the restoration of its financial situation.
Ta analiza bi morala vključevati ukrepe, namenjene odpravljanju vzrokov težav prejemnika podpore, ki lahko učinkovito podprejo ponovno vzpostavitev njegovega finančnega položaja.
The assessment of the various conditions falls in the responsibility of the entity providing the support (providing entity) and of the competent authority responsible for the providing institution.
Ocena različnih pogojev sodi med odgovornosti subjekta, ki nudi podporo (ponudnik podpore), in pristojnega organa, ki je odgovoren za ponudnika podpore.
The assessment should take into account the risk of potential adverse developments.
Ocena bi morala upoštevati tveganje potencialnega negativnega razvoja dogodkov.
For a comprehensive assessment of the conditions that relate to the providing entity, the competent authority responsible for the providing entity should also take into account information and assessments provided by the competent authority responsible for the group entity receiving the financial support.
Za celovito oceno pogojev, povezanih s ponudnikom podpore, bi moral pristojni organ, ki je odgovoren za ponudnika podpore, upoštevati tudi informacije in ocene, ki jih zagotovi pristojni organ, odgovoren za subjekt v skupini, ki prejme finančno pomoč.
The condition that the terms of the provision are in accordance with Article 19(7) of Directive 2014/59/EU should take into account the default risk of the receiving entity and the loss for the providing entity given a default of the receiving entity, based on a comparison of the situations following the support or, respectively, without granting it, and on full disclosure of the relevant information.
Pogoj, da so pogoji zagotovitve pomoči skladni s členom 19(7) Direktive 2014/59/EU, bi moral upoštevati tveganje neizpolnjevanja finančnih obveznosti prejemnika podpore in izgubo ponudnika podpore zaradi neizpolnjevanja finančnih obveznosti prejemnika podpore na podlagi primerjave razmer po prejemu podpore oziroma ob odsotnosti podpore in na podlagi popolnega razkritja zadevnih informacij.
Those terms should reflect the best interest of the providing entity as described in point (b) of Article 19(7), which stipulates that any direct or indirect benefits may be taken into account that may accrue to a party as a result of the provision of the financial support.
Navedeni pogoji bi morali odražati najboljši interes ponudnika podpore, kot je opisano v točki (b) člena 19(7), ki določa, da se lahko upoštevajo vse neposredne ali posredne koristi, ki jih lahko stranka pridobi z zagotovitvijo finančne podpore.
This should be verified by a thorough analysis of costs and benefits for the providing entity and the group as a whole in these two scenarios.
To bi bilo treba preveriti z natančno analizo stroškov in koristi za ponudnika podpore in skupino kot celoto v navedenih dveh scenarijih.
Financial support agreements and the provision of the group financial support may improve the resolvability of a group, for example if they are in line with the loss absorption mechanism provided by the resolution strategy.
Sporazumi o finančni podpori in zagotovitev finančne podpore v skupini lahko izboljšajo rešljivost skupine, na primer če so v skladu z mehanizmom za pokrivanje izgub, ki ga zagotavlja strategija reševanja.
However, they may also impair the feasibility of the implementation of the chosen resolution strategy, for example if that strategy envisages a separation of different parts of the group.
Vendar lahko tudi zmanjšajo izvedljivost izbrane strategije reševanja, na primer če strategija predvideva ločitev različnih delov skupine.
Therefore the assessment of the impact on resolvability should be based on the resolvability assessment, on the individual resolution plan, and, where applicable, on the group resolution plan as determined by the joint decision of resolution colleges.
Zato bi morala ocena vpliva na rešljivost temeljiti na oceni rešljivosti, individualnem načrtu reševanja in po potrebi na načrtu reševanja skupine, kot je določen s skupno odločitvijo kolegijev za reševanje.
When carrying out their valuation tasks for the purposes of Article 36, including Article 49(3), and Article 74 of Directive 2014/59/EU it is necessary to ensure that independent valuers are not being influenced, and are not perceived to be influenced, by public authorities, including the resolution authority, or by the institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of that Directive.
Zagotoviti je treba, da na neodvisne ocenjevalce vrednosti pri izvajanju njihovih nalog za namene člena 36, vključno s členom 49(3) in členom 74 Direktive 2014/59/EU, ne vplivajo in da se ne zdi, da nanje vplivajo javni organi, vključno z organi za reševanje, ali institucija ali subjekt iz točke (b), (c) ali (d) člena 1(1) navedene direktive.
Accordingly, uniform rules should apply to determine the circumstances in which a person shall be considered independent from the relevant public authorities, including the resolution authority, and from the institution or the entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Zato bi morala veljati enotna pravila za določanje okoliščin, v katerih se oseba šteje kot neodvisna od zadevnih javnih organov, vključno z organi za reševanje, in od institucije ali subjekta iz točke (b), (c) ali (d) člena 1(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU.
Those rules should contain requirements as to the expertise and resources of the person concerned and their relation to the relevant public authorities, including the resolution authority, and the institution or the entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Navedena pravila bi morala vsebovati zahteve v zvezi s strokovnim znanjem in viri zadevnih oseb ter njihovim razmerjem z zadevnimi javnimi organi, vključno z organi za reševanje, in z institucijo ali subjektom iz točke (b), (c) ali (d) člena 1(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU.
Independence can be reinforced by conditions ensuring the adequacy of the expertise and resources of the independent valuer.
Neodvisnost se lahko poveča s pogoji, ki zagotavljajo zadostno strokovno znanje in vire neodvisnega ocenjevalca vrednosti.
More specifically it should be ensured that the independent valuer possesses the necessary qualifications, knowledge and expertise in all relevant subjects, in particular valuation and accounting in the context of the banking industry.
Natančneje bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da ima neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti potrebne kvalifikacije, znanje in strokovne kompetence na vseh relevantnih področjih, zlasti na področju vrednotenja in računovodstva v bančnem sektorju.
It should also be ensured that the independent valuer holds, or has access to, sufficient human and technical resources to carry out the valuation.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da ima neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti dovolj človeških in tehničnih virov ali dostop do njih, da lahko izvede vrednotenje.
For that purpose, it could be appropriate to access sufficient human and technical resources by engaging staff or contractors from other valuation specialists or law firms or other sources, in relation to the carrying out of the valuation.
V ta namen bi bilo za izvedbo vrednotenja ustrezno pridobiti dostop do zadostnih človeških in tehničnih virov, in sicer z najemom osebja ali pogodbenih izvajalcev iz drugih podjetij ali odvetniških pisarn ali drugih virov, ki so specializirani za vrednotenje.
Where staff or contractors are engaged to support the conduct of the valuation they should be subject to conflicts of interest verification so as to ensure that independence is not undermined.
Če za pomoč pri izvedbi vrednotenja najame osebje ali pogodbene izvajalce, bi bilo treba preveriti, da pri njih ne obstaja navzkrižje interesov, da se zagotovi, da neodvisnost ni ogrožena.
In all cases the independent valuer should remain responsible for the outcome of the valuation.
V vseh primerih bi moral neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti ostati odgovoren za rezultat vrednotenja.
Furthermore it should be ensured that the independent valuer is also capable of carrying out the valuation effectively without undue reliance on any relevant public authority, including the resolution authority, and the institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) or Article 1(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da je neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti sposoben učinkovito izvesti vrednotenje brez nepotrebnega zanašanja na zadevne javne organe, vključno z organi za reševanje, in na institucijo ali subjekt iz točke (b), (c) ali (d) člena 1(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU.
However, the provision of instructions or guidance necessary to support the conduct of the valuation, for example in relation to the methodology provided pursuant to the Union legislation in the field of valuation for purposes relating to resolution, should not be seen as constituting undue reliance where such instructions are, or guidance is, considered necessary to support the conduct of the valuation.
Kljub temu pa zagotovitve navodil ali smernic, potrebnih za izvedbo vrednotenja, na primer glede metodologije na podlagi zakonodaje Unije na področju vrednotenja za namene v zvezi z reševanjem, ne bi smeli razumeti kot nepotrebno zanašanje, kadar so takšna navodila ali smernice potrebne za pomoč pri izvedbi vrednotenja.
In addition, the provision of assistance, such as the provision by the institution or entity concerned of systems, financial statements, regulatory reports, market data, other records or other assistance to the independent valuer should not be prevented where, in the assessment of the appointing authority or such other authority as may be empowered to conduct this task in the Member State concerned, this is considered necessary to support the conduct of the valuation.
Poleg tega se ne bi smelo preprečiti zagotovitve pomoči, kot so na primer sistemi, računovodski izkazi, regulativna poročila, tržni podatki, druge evidence ali druga pomoč, ki jih zadevna institucija ali subjekt zagotovi neodvisnemu ocenjevalcu vrednosti, kadar organ za imenovanje ali drug tak organ, ki je lahko pooblaščen za izvedbo te naloge v zadevni državi članici, meni, da je to potrebno za podporo pri izvedbi vrednotenja.
In accordance with any procedures which may be put in place, the provision of instructions, guidance and other forms of support should be agreed on a case-by-case or pooled basis.
V skladu s postopki, ki se lahko vzpostavijo, se o zagotovitvi navodil, smernic in drugih oblik pomoči dogovarja za vsak primer posebej ali za več primerov skupaj.
The payment of reasonable remuneration and the reimbursement of reasonable expenses in connection with the valuation should not be prevented.
Primernega plačila in povračila razumnih stroškov v zvezi z vrednotenjem se ne bi smelo preprečevati.
Independence can be endangered if valuation is performed by a person who is employed by or affiliated to any relevant public authority, including the resolution authority, and the institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU even in cases where full structural separation to address threats such as self-review, self-interest, advocacy, familiarity, trust or intimidation has been established.
Neodvisnost je lahko ogrožena, če vrednotenje izvede oseba, ki je zaposlena pri katerem koli zadevnem javnem organu, vključno z organom za reševanje, in instituciji ali subjektu iz točk (b), (c) ali (d) člena 1(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU, ali povezana z njimi, tudi v primerih, ko je bilo vzpostavljena popolna strukturna ločitev, da bi se odpravili dejavniki, ki ogrožajo neodvisnost, kot so samopregledovanje, lastni interesi, zagovorništvo, poznanstva, zaupanje ali ustrahovanje.
Therefore, there is a need to ensure that appropriate legal separation is secured such that the independent valuer is not an employee or contractor of, nor in a group with, any relevant public authority, including the resolution authority, or the institution or entity concerned.
Zato je treba zagotoviti ustrezno pravno ločitev, tako da neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti ni zaposleni ali pogodbeni delavec ali v isti skupini s katerim koli zadevnim javnim organom, vključno z organom za reševanje, ali zadevno institucijo ali subjektom.
It is also necessary to ensure that the independent valuer does not have any material interest in common or in conflict with any relevant public authority, including the resolution authority, and the institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU, including its senior management, controlling shareholders, group entities and significant creditors, as could be the case when the independent valuer is a significant creditor of the institution or entity concerned.
Treba je tudi zagotoviti, da neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti nima pomembnega interesa, ki je skupen ali v navzkrižju z zadevnim javnim organom, vključno z organom za reševanje, in institucijo ali subjektom iz točk (b), (c) ali (d) člena 1(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU, kar vključuje višje vodstvo, obvladujoče delničarje, subjekte v skupini in pomembne upnike, kot bi se lahko zgodilo, če bi bil neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti pomemben upnik zadevne institucije ali subjekta.
Similarly, personal relationships could represent a material interest.
Podobno bi lahko tudi osebni odnosi predstavljali pomemben interes.
Accordingly, the appointing authority, or such other authority as may be empowered to conduct the task in the Member State concerned, should assess whether any material common or conflicting interests are present.
Zato bi moral organ za imenovanje ali drug organ, ki je lahko pooblaščen za izvajanje naloge v zadevni državni članici, oceniti, ali obstajajo kakršni koli pomembni skupni ali navzkrižni interesi.
For the purposes of this assessment the independent valuer should notify the appointing authority, or such other authority as may be empowered to conduct this task in the Member State concerned, of any actual or potential interest which the person considers may, in the assessment of that authority, be considered to amount to a material interest and provide any information as may be reasonably requested by the authority to inform this assessment.
Za namene te ocene bi moral neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti organ za imenovanje ali drug organ, ki je lahko pooblaščen za izvajanje te naloge v zadevni državi članici, obvestiti o vseh dejanskih ali potencialnih interesih, za katere oseba meni, da bi glede na oceno navedenega organa lahko predstavljali pomemben interes, in zagotoviti vse informacije, ki jih organ lahko razumno zahteva za oblikovanje te ocene.
In the case of legal persons, independence should be assessed by reference to the company or partnership as a whole but taking account of any structural separation and other arrangements that may be put in place to differentiate between those staff members who may be involved in the valuation and other staff members, to address threats such as self-review, self-interest, advocacy, familiarity, trust or intimidation.
V primeru pravnih oseb bi bilo treba neodvisnost oceniti na podlagi podjetja ali partnerstva kot celote, a ob upoštevanju strukturne ločitve in drugih ureditev, ki so vzpostavljene za razlikovanje med tistimi zaposlenimi, ki so lahko vključeni v vrednotenje, in drugimi zaposlenimi, da bi se odpravili dejavniki, ki ogrožajo neodvisnost, kot so samopregledovanje, lastni interesi, zagovorništvo, poznanstva, zaupanje ali ustrahovanje.
If the significance of those threats compared to the safeguards applied is such that the person's independence is compromised, the company or partnership should not be the independent valuer.
Če so ti dejavniki, ki ogrožajo neodvisnost, v primerjavi z uporabljenimi zaščitnimi ukrepi takšni, da je ogrožena neodvisnost osebe, podjetje ali partnerstvo ne bi smelo biti neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti.
A statutory auditor who has completed an audit of the institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU in the year preceding the independent valuer's assessment for eligibility to act as valuer should not be regarded as independent under any circumstances.
Zakoniti revizor, ki je opravil revizijo institucije ali subjekta iz točke (b), (c) ali (d) člena 1(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU v letu pred oceno primernosti neodvisnega ocenjevalca vrednosti za ocenjevalca vrednosti, se v nobenem primeru ne šteje kot neodvisen.
As regards other audit or valuation services provided to the institution or entity concerned in the years immediately preceding the date on which independence is to be assessed, these should also be assumed to present a material interest in common or in conflict unless it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the appointing authority, or such other authority as may be empowered to conduct this task in the Member State concerned, that this is not the case having regard to all relevant circumstances, including any structural separation or other arrangements in place.
Za druge storitve revizije ali vrednotenja, opravljene za zadevno institucijo ali subjekt v letih neposredno pred datumom, na katerega se ocenjuje neodvisnost, se šteje, da predstavljajo pomemben skupni ali navzkrižni interes, razen če se organu za imenovanje ali drugemu organu, ki je lahko pooblaščen za izvajanje te naloge v zadevni državi članici, zadovoljivo dokaže, da to ne drži, pri čemer se upoštevajo vse relevantne okoliščine, vključno s strukturno ločitvijo ali drugimi veljavnimi ureditvami.
Following appointment it is essential that the independent valuer maintains policies and procedures in accordance with the applicable codes of ethics and professional standards to identify any actual or potential interest which the valuer considers may amount to a material interest in common or in conflict.
Po imenovanju je bistveno, da neodvisni ocenjevalec vrednosti vzdržuje politike in postopke v skladu z ustreznimi etičnimi kodeksi in poklicnimi standardi, da bi ugotovil vse dejanske ali potencialne interese, ki bi se po njegovem mnenju lahko šteli za pomembne skupne ali navzkrižne interese.
The appointing authority, or such other authority as may be identified in the Member State concerned, should be notified immediately of any actual or potential interests identified and should consider whether these amount to a material interest in which case the independent valuer's appointment should be terminated and a new valuer appointed.
Organ za imenovanje ali drug organ, ki je lahko določen v zadevni državi članici, bi bilo treba takoj obvestiti o kakršnih kolih ugotovljenih dejanskih ali potencialnih interesih, ta pa bi moral preučiti, ali predstavljajo pomemben interes; v tem primeru bi bilo treba preklicati imenovanje neodvisnega ocenjevalca vrednosti in imenovati novega.
Directive 2014/59/EU requires Member States to confer on their resolution authorities a range of powers, including the write-down and conversion powers as defined in point (66) of Article 2(1) of that Directive which can be applied independently of, or in conjunction with, resolution action.
Direktiva 2014/59/EU zahteva, da države članice organom za reševanje podelijo različna pooblastila, vključno s pooblastili za odpis in konverzijo, kot je opredeljeno v točki 66 člena 2(1) navedene direktive, ki se lahko uporabijo samostojno ali skupaj z ukrepom za reševanje.
It is important to ensure that the write-down and conversion powers can be applied in relation to all liabilities that are not excluded by Article 44(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Treba je zagotoviti, da se lahko pooblastila za odpis in konverzijo uporabijo za vse obveznosti, ki niso izključene v skladu s členom 44(2) Direktive 2014/59/EU.
For liabilities governed by the law of a third country, other than those falling within the list of liabilities to which the exclusion in Article 55(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU applies, a contractual term should be included to support the application of the write-down and conversion powers to such liabilities.
Pri obveznostih, ki jih ureja pravo tretje države, razen tistih, ki sodijo na seznam obveznosti, za katere velja izjema iz člena 55(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU, bi bilo treba vključiti pogodbeno določilo, da se podpre uporaba pooblastil za odpis in konverzijo pri takih obveznostih.