natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The similarities of the production processes between Mexico and China supported further the conclusion that Mexico was an appropriate analogue country for this investigation.
Predložila ni nobenih informacij o stroških specifičnega kitajskega proizvajalca ali za sektor dejavnosti na Kitajskem niti se ni sklicevala na nobenega drugega proizvajalca, ki bi uporabljal podobne proizvodne procese, da bi Komisija lahko ocenila domnevne razlike med tehnologijo, ki se uporablja na Kitajskem, in tehnologijo sodelujočega mehiškega proizvajalca ter morebiten učinek na primernost Mehike kot primerljive države.
The interested party did not submit sufficient evidence in order to explain and quantify in terms of costs the differences between its allegedly advanced production technology and the technology that is used in Mexico.
Poleg tega se nobena družba iz Južne Koreje ni odločila za sodelovanje.
It did not submit any cost information of a specific Chinese producer, nor for the sector of activity in China, nor referring to any other producer using similar production processes, that would have allowed the Commission to assess the alleged differences between the technology used in China and the cooperating Mexican producer, and the impact, if any, in the appropriateness of Mexico as the analogue country.
Zato je bila trditev zavrnjena.
Moreover, no cooperation was received from South Korea.
Komisija je posledično potrdila Mehiko kot edino razpoložljivo ustrezno primerljivo državo.
Thus the claim was rejected.
Po dokončnem razkritju je en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je Komisija nekritično sprejela Mehiko kot primerljivo državo zgolj, ker je to ustrezalo njenim potrebam, da bi ugotovila višje stopnje dampinga.
Consequently, the Commission confirmed Mexico as the only available appropriate analogue country.
Ta trditev je bila zgolj izjava, pri čemer je zainteresirana stran ni utemeljila niti ni predložila dokazov, da Mehika ni ustrezna primerljiva država.
Following definitive disclosure, one Chinese exporting producer claimed that the Commission uncritically accepted Mexico as analogue country just for the reason that such choice served its needs of finding high dumping margins.
V vsakem primeru pa Komisija opozarja, da mora, če v državi s tržnim gospodarstvom sodeluje le en izvoznik proizvajalec, na podlagi sodbe Sodišča v zadevi GLS (C-338/10) uporabiti navedeno državo.
The specific claim was a mere statement and the interested party did not substantiate its assertion nor provided any evidence that Mexico was not an appropriate analogue country.
Normalna vrednost
In any event, the Commission recalls that where it only receives cooperation from one exporting producer in a market economy country, the Commission is obliged, based on the GLS judgment of the Court (C-338/10), to use that country.
Podrobni podatki za izračun normalne vrednosti so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 29 do 37 začasne uredbe.
Normal value
Eden od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdil, da je bila večina podatkov za določitev stopnje dampinga neupravičeno varovana kot zaupna.
The details for the calculation of the normal value are set out in recitals (29) to (37) of the provisional Regulation.
Ta stran je zlasti izrazila pripombo nad dejstvom, da normalna vrednost sodelujočega proizvajalca ni bila razkrita.
One Chinese exporting producer claimed that most of the data for the establishment of the dumping margin have been kept unreasonably confidential.
V skladu s členom 19(1) osnovne uredbe so informacije, ki so po svoji naravi zaupne, tiste informacije, katerih razkritje lahko: (1) zagotovi znatno prednost konkurentu ali (2) škoduje osebi, ki je te informacije dala na voljo, ali pa osebi, od katere so bile informacije pridobljene.
The party especially commented upon the fact that the normal value of the cooperating producer was not disclosed.
Ker so podatki o prodaji in stroških po svoji naravi zaupni, so bili v začasni uredbi podatki o dobičku ter o prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroških proizvajalca iz primerljive države navedeni z odstotnimi deleži v razponih, s čimer je bila zagotovljena največja možna preglednost brez kršenja zaupnosti teh podatkov.
According to Articles 19(1) of the basic Regulation, information confidential by nature is information, the disclosure of which may cause: (1) significant advantage to a competitor; or (2) adverse effect upon a person supplying the information or upon a person from whom the information has been acquired.
Proizvajalec iz primerljive države je zahteval in utemeljil zaupno obravnavo svojih podatkov o prodaji in stroških, katerih razkritje bi lahko škodilo konkurenčnemu položaju družbe.
Since data with respect to sales and costs are confidential by nature, in the provisional Regulation data regarding profit, selling, general and administrative costs of the analogue county producer have been provided on a percentage basis in ranges, providing in that way transparency to the most possible extent without violating their confidential nature.
Poleg tega bi lahko razkritje normalne vrednosti konkurentom omogočilo, da bi sami ugotovili cene in stroške proizvajalca iz primerljive države.
The analogue country producer requested and justified confidentiality treatment of its sales and costs data, disclosure of which could harm company's competitive position.
Ker v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo ni bilo drugih pripomb, so bile uvodne izjave 29 do 37 začasne uredbe potrjene.
In addition, the disclosure of the normal value could provide the possibility a competitor to construct back the prices and costs of the analogue country producer.
Po dokončnem razkritju je kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik Zhejiang Gross Seamless Steel Tube Co., Ltd. („Gross“) trdil, da je Komisija uporabila le eno konstruirano normalno vrednost za 27 vrst izdelka, ki jih je v obdobju preiskave izvažala družba Gross, pri čemer ni razlikovala med različnimi vrstami jekla in stroški za poboljšanje v njenem proizvodnem procesu.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the normal value, recitals from (29) to (37) of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Ta trditev je temeljila na branju in razlagi posameznih delov dokumenta o splošnem razkritju, pri čemer se pri njihovem pomenu ni upošteval pomen celotnega dokumenta.
Following definitive disclosure, one Chinese exporting producer, Zhejiang Gross Seamless Steel Tube Co., Ltd (‘Gross’) claimed that the Commission used one constructed normal value only, for the 27 product types that Gross exported during the investigation period, without distinguishing the different steel types and the costs for quenching and tempering in its production process.
Komisija je opozorila, da so bili podrobni podatki o izračunu dampinga navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 44 do 47 začasne uredbe in omenjeni v uvodni izjavi 41 dokumenta o splošnem razkritju.
The specific claim was based on the reading and interpretation of individual parts of the general disclosure document by isolating their meaning from the meaning of the whole document.
V uvodni izjavi 44 začasne uredbe je natančno navedeno, da je Komisija primerjavo normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene izvedla za vsako vrsto izdelka ločeno ter da nikoli ni uporabila ene normalne vrednosti za vse vrste izdelka.
The Commission recalled here that the details of the dumping calculation were set out in recitals (44) to (47) of the provisional Regulation and mentioned in recital (41) of the general disclosure document.
Vrste izdelka, ki so se uporabile za primerjavo, so bile opredeljene v vprašalnikih, ki so bili poslani proizvajalcu v primerljivi državi, kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom in proizvajalcem Unije.
Recital (44) of the provisional Regulation mentioned precisely that the Commission conducted the comparison of the normal value and export price, for each product type in isolation and never used one normal value for all product types.
Določeni so bili razred jekla, poboljšanje in druge lastnosti, ki so se upoštevali pri izračunu stroškov proizvodnje in konstruiranju normalne vrednosti za vsako vrsto izdelka ločeno z ustrezno prilagoditvijo za vsako lastnost.
The product types that were used for the comparison were defined in the questionnaires that were sent to the analogue country producer, Chinese exporting producers and Union producers.
Ker je trditev temeljila na napačni razlagi dokumenta o splošnem razkritju, je bila zavrnjena.
Steel grade, quenching and tempering and other characteristics were specified and taken into account for the calculation of the cost of production and the construction of the normal value for each product type separately, by adjusting for each characteristic properly.
Družba Gross je tudi trdila, da bi morala Komisija iz njenega izvoza izključiti tiste vrste izdelka, ki jih proizvajalec iz primerljive države Mehike, tj. družba TAMSA, ne proizvaja.
Since the claim was based on a misinterpretation of the general disclosure document, it was rejected.
Po odločitvah STO v zadevi „Evropske skupnosti – Dokončni protidampinški ukrepi za nekatere pritrdilne elemente iz železa ali jekla iz Ljudske republike Kitajske“ [5] je praksa Komisije, da je treba normalno vrednost poiskati ali konstruirati za vse vrste izdelka, ki jih izvaža proizvajalec izvoznik.
Gross also claimed that the Commission should eliminate from its export sales those product types that TAMSA, the Mexican analogue country producer, does not produce.
Komisija je zato trditev zavrnila.
The Commission's practice following the WTO rulings on the case ‘European Communities — Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Iron or Steel Fasteners from China’ [5] is that a normal value should be found or constructed for all types exported by the exporting producer.
Izvozna cena
The Commission therefore rejected the claim.
Ker v zvezi z izvozno ceno ni bilo pripomb, sta bili uvodni izjavi 38 in 39 začasne uredbe potrjeni.
In the absence of any comments concerning the export price, recitals (38) and (39) of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Podrobnosti o metodi, uporabljeni za primerjavo med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, so navedene v uvodnih izjavah 40 do 43 začasne uredbe.
Comparison
Opozoriti je treba, da Kitajska izvaja politiko samo delnega vračila DDV ob izvozu.
The details of the method used for the comparison between the normal value and the export price of the sampled exporting producers are set out in recitals (40) to (43) of the provisional Regulation.
Za zagotovitev, da je bila normalna vrednost izražena ob enaki stopnji obdavčenja kot izvozna cena, je bila normalna vrednost v začasni uredbi določena z vključitvijo DDV, ki se zaračunava na izvoz brezšivnih cevi z velikim premerom in ki kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom ni bil vrnjen.
It is recalled here that China applies a policy of reimbursing VAT upon export only partially.
Stopnja specifičnega nevračljivega DDV je bila 8 % za vse vrste izdelka.
To ensure that the normal value was expressed at the same level of taxation as the export price, the normal value in the provisional Regulation was determined with the inclusion of the VAT charged on exports of large diameter seamless pipes and tubes that was not refunded to the Chinese exporting producers.
V zvezi s tem je pritožnik podal pripombo, da stopnja vračljivega DDV na Kitajskem ni bila enaka za vse vrste izdelka.
The specific non-refundable VAT was at the level of 8 % for all product types.
Tako je bila stopnja vračljivega DDV za cevi, ki se uporabljajo za dejavnosti izkoriščanja nafte in plina, 13 %, za druge vrste izdelka pa 9 %.
In this regard, the complainants commented that the refundable VAT in China was not the same for all product types.
Pritožnik je trdil, da bi bilo treba glede na to stopnje dampinga ponovno izračunati, in zahteval potrditev, da je bil specifični DDV dejansko plačan, preden je bil vrnjen.
Specifically, for pipes and tubes used in the oil and gas exploration business, the refundable VAT was 13 % and for the other product types it was 9 %.
Ker je bila stopnja DDV na Kitajskem enaka za vse vrste izdelka, in sicer 17 %, je bila tako stopnja nevračljivega DDV za cevi, ki se uporabljajo za dejavnosti izkoriščanja nafte in plina, 4 %, za druge vrste izdelka pa 8 %.
The complainant claimed that the dumping margins should be recalculated accordingly and requested a confirmation that the specific VAT was effectively paid before being reimbursed.
Zato je Komisija popravila prilagoditve za družbe, ki so v svojih izpolnjenih vprašalnikih navedle dejansko vrnjeni DDV za vsako posamezno transakcijo.
Since the VAT in China was the same for all products types at the level of 17 %, the non-refundable VAT for pipes and tubes used in the oil and gas exploration business was therefore 4 % and for the other product types was 8 %.
Zadevna proizvajalca izvoznika sta bili družbi Yangzhou Lontrin Steel Tube Co., Ltd. in Hengyang Valin MPM Co., Ltd.
Thus, the Commission revised the adjustments for the companies which reported the actual refunded VAT on a transaction by transaction basis in their questionnaire replies.
Za ti družbi so bile stopnje dampinga ustrezno ponovno izračunane.
The specific exporting producers were Yangzhou Lontrin Steel Tube Co., Ltd and Hengyang Valin MPM Co., Ltd The dumping margins for these companies were recalculated accordingly.
S ponovnim izračunom, pri katerem so bile upoštevane specifične stopnje nevračljivega DDV, so bile ugotovljene nekoliko nižje stopnje dampinga.
The recalculation taking into account the specific non-refundable VAT rates led to slightly lower dumping margins.
Stopnje dampinga drugih vzorčenih družb so ostale na začasni ravni.
The dumping margins of the other sampled companies remained at the provisional level.
Med preveritvenimi obiski je bilo potrjeno, da je bil DDV dejansko plačan, preden je bil vrnjen.
During the verification visits it was confirmed that the VAT was effectively paid before being reimbursed.
Stopnje dampinga
Dumping margins
Podrobni podatki o izračunu dampinga so bili navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 44 do 47 začasne uredbe.
The details of the dumping calculation were set out in recitals (44) to (47) of the provisional Regulation.
Za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike so bile z natančnejšimi prilagoditvami DDV za normalne vrednosti določene naslednje dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot delež cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve:
Concerning the sampled exporting producers, the more precise VAT adjustments on the normal values led to the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, as follows:
Družba
Company
Dokončna stopnja dampinga (v %)
Hengyang Valin MPM Co., Ltd
Drugi sodelujoči proizvajalci
Other cooperating producers
Vsi drugi proizvajalci
All other producers
Pri edinem proizvajalcu izvozniku, ki je zahteval individualno preiskavo, tj. družbi Zhejiang Gross Seamless Steel Tube Co., Ltd., je bila dokončna stopnja dampinga v dokumentih o splošnem razkritju določena na ravni 66,0 %.
Following definitive disclosure, one Chinese exporting producer (Zhejiang Gross Seamless Steel Tube Co., Ltd (‘Gross’)) claimed that its dumping margin (66,0 %) cannot be higher than the dumping margins of Yangzhou Chengde Steel Pipe Co., Ltd, (‘Chengde’) and Yangzhou Lontrin Steel Tube Co., Ltd (‘Lontrin’) which were 45,4 % and 39,9 % respectively.
Mešanica izdelka, ki se je izvažala, je bila torej odločilen dejavnik pri izračunu tehtanega povprečja stopenj dampinga.
The claim was based on the conjunction of two considerations: (i) the assumption that the normal value that was used for the calculation of the dumping margins was the same for the three Chinese exporters; and (ii) the fact that, according to the Chinese trade statistics at the level of the customs codes, the average unit export price of Gross was higher than the respective prices of Chengde and Lontrin.
Ker trije proizvajalci izvozniki v obdobju preiskave niso izvažali enake mešanice izdelka, zadevna predpostavka družbe Gross ni pravilna.
With respect to the assumption made by Gross, the Commission recalled here that the calculation of the dumping margin was not based on an average normal value for each exporting producer, but on the normal value of each product type that was exported to the Union market by this exporting producer.
Poleg tega so izvozne cene na enoto, ki so se uporabile za izračun stopnje dampinga, temeljile na dejanskih izvoznih transakcijah in ne na statističnih podatkih.
Thus, the product mix that was exported was the determinant for the calculation of the weighted average dumping margin.
Hkrati so bile izvozne cene na enoto določene na ravni vrst izdelka, ki ni ustrezala ravni carinskih oznak, na kateri je temeljila trditev družbe Gross.
Since the three exporting producers did not export the same product mix during the investigation period, the specific assumption made by Gross is incorrect.
Ker je trditev temeljila na napačnih predpostavkah in nezadostnih dejstvih, je bila zavrnjena.
Furthermore, the unit export prices that were used for the calculation of the dumping margin were based on the actual export transactions and not on statistical data.
Kljub temu se je zaradi popravka nekaterih administrativnih napak, ki so bile ugotovljene med ponovno proučitvijo izračunov stopenj dampinga, dokončna stopnja dampinga zmanjšala s 66,0 % na 52,3 %.
At the same time, the unit export prices were determined at the level of the product types which did not correspond with the level of the customs codes that Gross used in its claim.
D. INDUSTRIJA UNIJE
Since the claim was based on incorrect assumptions and insufficient facts, it was rejected.
Ker v zvezi z industrijo Unije ni bilo pripomb, so bile uvodne izjave 49 do 51 začasne uredbe potrjene.
However, the correction of some clerical mistakes that were revealed during the re-examination of the dumping margin calculations, led to a decrease of the definitive dumping margin from 66,0 % to 52,3 %.
Pripombe k uvodni izjavi 52 začasne uredbe v zvezi z vzorčenjem industrije Unije so bile obravnavane zgoraj v povezavi s pripombami k uvodnim izjavam 7 do 9 začasne uredbe.
D. UNION INDUSTRY
E. ŠKODA
In the absence of comments concerning Union industry, the recitals (49) to (51) of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Potrošnja Unije
The comments to the recital (52) of the provisional Regulation concerning the sampling of the Union industry have been addressed above in conjunction with the comments to recitals (7) to (9) of the provisional Regulation.
Ker v zvezi s potrošnjo Unije ni bilo pripomb, so bili sklepi iz uvodne izjave 53 začasne uredbe potrjeni.
E. INJURY
Uvoz iz zadevne države v Unijo
Union consumption
Obseg in tržni delež zadevnega uvoza
In the absence of comments concerning Union consumption, the conclusions set out in the recital (53) of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Po začasnem razkritju je en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik oporekal obsegu uvoza za leto 2012 iz uvodne izjave 54 začasne uredbe, pri čemer je trdil, da je bil ta obseg drugačen od podatkov, uporabljenih v predhodno zaključeni preiskavi, ki se je nanašala na isti izdelek.
Imports into the Union from the country concerned
Po dokončnem razkritju sta en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik in združenje kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov trdila, da Komisija v svojem pojasnilu v uvodni izjavi 59 ni obravnavala njune trditve, da bi bilo leto 2011 primernejše za začetno leto obdobja preiskave.
Following provisional disclosure, one Chinese exporting producer contested the 2012 import volume in recital (54) of the provisional Regulation, claiming that the volume was different from the data used in a previously terminated investigation that had concerned the same product.
Trditev v zvezi z obdobjem preiskave je bila obravnavana v uvodni izjavi 17.
The Commission clarified that the complaint in that previous investigation was lodged in December 2012.
Ker v zvezi z obsegom uvoza ni bilo drugih pripomb, sta bili uvodni izjavi 54 in 55 začasne uredbe potrjeni.
Therefore, it did not contain the import volumes of the full year 2012, but instead was based on the second half of 2011 and the first half of 2012.
Cene uvoza in nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen
The data used in recital (54) of the provisional Regulation reflected the Eurostat data for the entire years 2012 to 2015.
Po dokončnem razkritju je bila ugotovljena administrativna napaka v zvezi s statističnimi podatki o uvozu v uvodnih izjavah 56 do 58 in 105 začasne uredbe.
The claim was therefore rejected.
Ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 56 začasne uredbe so bile zato spremenjene, kot sledi:
Following definitive disclosure, one Chinese exporting producer and the association of Chinese exporting producers claimed that in recital (59) the Commission's explanation did not address their claim that 2011 would have been a more appropriate starting year of the investigation period.
Spodnja preglednica prikazuje povprečno ceno uvoza iz Kitajske:
The Commission clarified that recital (59) referred to a different claim from a different interested party.
Vir: Evropska komisija (Eurostat).
The claim concerning the investigation period was addressed in recital (17).
OP (2015)
In the absence of other comments concerning the import volumes, the recitals (54) and (55) of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Povprečna cena v EUR/tono
Prices of imports and price undercutting
Indeks (2012 = 100)
Following definitive disclosure, a clerical error concerning the import statistics was detected in recitals (56) to (58) and recital (105) of the provisional Regulation.
Ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 57 začasne uredbe so bile zato spremenjene, kot sledi:
As a result, the findings in recital (56) of the provisional Regulation were revised as follows:
Povprečne uvozne cene so bile določene na podlagi statističnih podatkov Eurostata o uvozu.
Source: European Commission (Eurostat)
Uvozne cene so bile leta 2014 nekoliko nižje kot v prejšnjih letih, leta 2015 pa so se zvišale na začetne ravni.
IP (2015)
Ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 58 začasne uredbe so bile zato spremenjene, kot sledi:
Index (2012 = 100)
Medtem ko je povprečna izvozna cena vseh kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v OP znašala 1099 EUR/tono, je povprečna izvozna cena vzorčenih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov znašala od 946 EUR/tono do 1444 EUR/tono oziroma v povprečju 1102 EUR/tono.
The findings in Recital (57) of the provisional Regulation were revised as follows:
Ker v zvezi z uvoznimi cenami ni bilo drugih pripomb, so bile uvodne izjave 56 do 59 začasne uredbe potrjene, kakor so bile spremenjene v uvodnih izjavah 64 do 66.
The average import prices were established on the basis of the Eurostat import statistics.
Po začasnem razkritju sta en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik in združenje kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zahtevala boljšo utemeljitev za izključitev dveh lastnosti iz kontrolnih številk izdelka (PCN) z namenom določitve stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen in stopnje škode.
The average import prices from China remained fairly stable during the period considered.
Trdila sta, da bi bile zaradi izključitve teh dveh lastnosti lahko opredeljene nerazumno visoke stopnje škode.
The import prices were slightly lower in the year 2014 than in the previous years, but in 2015 the prices increased back to their initial levels.
Prav tako sta zahtevala pojasnila, zakaj se PCN 214NN in 215NN, izvoženi iz Kitajske, nista primerjali s prodajo Unije s strani proizvajalcev Unije.
The findings in Recital (58) of the provisional Regulation were also revised as follows:
Glede na informacije, predložene proizvajalcem izvoznikom ob začasnem razkritju, je Komisija pojasnila, da ni bilo ugotovljeno zadostno ujemanje z uporabo celotne PCN, sestavljene iz sedmih lastnosti.
However, the average import prices depend on the product mix, in particular of the steel grade, which is not visible in the trade statistics.
PCN je bila poenostavljena z izključitvijo lastnosti izdelka „poboljšanje“ in „preskušanje“.