natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Green Paper launched wide consultations on all aspects of the difficulties faced by couples in Europe when it comes to the liquidation of their common property and the legal remedies available.
Na podlagi te zelene knjige je potekalo obsežno posvetovanje o vseh težavah, ki jih imajo pari v Evropi pri likvidaciji medsebojnih premoženjskih razmerij, in o mogočih pravnih sredstvih.
At its meeting in Brussels on 10 and 11 December 2009 the European Council adopted a new multiannual programme called ‘The Stockholm programme — An open and secure Europe serving and protecting citizens’ [5].
Evropski svet je na zasedanju 10. in 11. decembra 2009 v Bruslju sprejel nov večletni program, imenovan „Stockholmski program – odprta in varna Evropa, ki služi državljanom in jih varuje“ [5].
In that programme the European Council considered that mutual recognition should be extended to fields that are not yet covered but are essential to everyday life, for example matrimonial property rights, while taking into consideration Member States' legal systems, including public policy (ordre public), and national traditions in this area.
V tem programu je menil, da bi bilo treba vzajemno priznavanje razširiti na področja, na katerih se to načelo še ne uporablja, so pa bistvena za vsakdanje življenje, kot na primer premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema, ob upoštevanju pravnih sistemov držav članic, vključno z javnim redom, in nacionalnih izročil na tem področju.
In the ‘EU Citizenship Report 2010: Dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens' rights’, adopted on 27 October 2010, the Commission announced that it would adopt a proposal for legislation to eliminate the obstacles to the free movement of persons, in particular the difficulties experienced by couples in managing or dividing their property.
Komisija je v „Poročilu o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2010: Odpravljanje ovir za pravice državljanov EU“, sprejetem 27. oktobra 2010, napovedala, da bo sprejela predlog zakonodajnega instrumenta, ki bo omogočil odpravo ovir za prosto gibanje oseb in zlasti rešitev težav parov pri upravljanju ali delitvi njihovega premoženja.
On 16 March 2011, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes and a proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions regarding the property consequences of registered partnerships.
Komisija je 16. marca 2011 sprejela predlog uredbe Sveta o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanju in izvrševanju odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema in predlog uredbe Sveta o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanju in izvrševanju odločb na področju premoženjskopravnih posledic registriranih partnerskih skupnosti.
At its meeting of 3 December 2015, the Council concluded that no unanimity could be reached for the adoption of the proposals for the regulations on matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships and that therefore the objectives of cooperation in this area could not be attained within a reasonable period by the Union as a whole.
Svet je na zasedanju 3. decembra 2015 ugotovil, da ni mogoče doseči soglasja za sprejetje predlogov uredb o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema in o premoženjskopravnih posledicah registriranih partnerskih skupnosti ter da zato Unija kot celota ne more v razumnem času doseči ciljev sodelovanja na tem področju.
From December 2015 to February 2016, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia, Finland and Sweden addressed requests to the Commission indicating that they wished to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of the property regimes of international couples and, specifically, of the jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes and jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions regarding the property consequences of registered partnerships, and asking the Commission to submit a proposal to the Council to that effect.
Od decembra 2015 do februarja 2016 so Belgija, Bolgarija, Češka, Nemčija, Grčija, Španija, Francija, Hrvaška, Italija, Luksemburg, Malta, Nizozemska, Avstrija, Portugalska, Slovenija, Finska in Švedska Komisiji poslali prošnje, v katerih je bilo navedeno, da želijo med seboj vzpostaviti okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, natančneje o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanju in izvrševanju odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema in pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanju in izvrševanju odločb na področju premoženjskopravnih posledic registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, in od Komisije zahtevali, naj Svetu predloži predlog v zvezi s tem.
By letter to the Commission in March 2016, Cyprus indicated its wish to participate in the establishment of the enhanced cooperation; Cyprus reiterated this wish during the work of the Council.
Ciper je v svojem dopisu iz marca 2016 sporočil, da želi sodelovati pri vzpostavitvi okrepljenega sodelovanja; Ciper je to željo potrdil v času dela Sveta.
On 9 June 2016, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2016/954 authorising such enhanced cooperation.
Svet je 9. junija 2016 sprejel Sklep (EU) 2016/954 o odobritvi takšnega okrepljenega sodelovanja.
According to Article 328(1) TFEU, when enhanced cooperation is being established, it is to be open to all Member States, subject to compliance with any conditions of participation laid down by the authorising decision.
V skladu s členom 328(1) PDEU se lahko v okrepljeno sodelovanje ob vzpostavitvi vključi vsaka država članica, ki izpolnjuje morebitne pogoje za sodelovanje, določene v sklepu o odobritvi.
It is also to be open to them at any other time, subject to compliance with the acts already adopted within that framework, in addition to those conditions.
Vanj se lahko vključi tudi kadar koli pozneje, pri čemer pa mora poleg navedenih pogojev upoštevati v tem okviru že sprejete akte.
The Commission and the Member States participating in enhanced cooperation should ensure that they promote participation by as many Member States as possible.
Komisija in države članice, ki so že udeležene pri okrepljenem sodelovanju, bi morale zagotoviti, da se spodbudi udeležba čim več držav članic.
This Regulation should be binding in its entirety and directly applicable only in the Member States which participate in enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the property regimes of international couples, covering both matters of matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships, by virtue of Decision (EU) 2016/954, or by virtue of a decision adopted in accordance with the second or third subparagraph of Article 331(1) TFEU.
Ta uredba bi morala biti v celoti zavezujoča in bi jo bilo treba neposredno uporabljati samo v državah članicah, ki so vključene v okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju pristojnosti, prava, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanja in izvrševanja odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako področje premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, in sicer na podlagi Sklepa (EU) 2016/954 ali na podlagi sklepa, sprejetega v skladu z drugim ali tretjim pododstavkom člena 331(1) PDEU.
In accordance with Article 81 TFEU, this Regulation should apply in the context of matrimonial property regimes having cross-border implications.
V skladu s členom 81 PDEU bi se morala ta uredba uporabljati za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema s čezmejnimi posledicami.
To provide married couples with legal certainty as to their property and offer them a degree of predictability, all the rules applicable to matrimonial property regimes should be covered in a single instrument.
Da bi se poročenim parom zagotovila pravna varnost glede njihovega premoženja in omogočila neka raven predvidljivosti, bi bilo treba vsa pravila, ki se uporabljajo za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema, združiti v enem samem instrumentu.
In order to achieve those objectives, this Regulation should bring together provisions on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition or, as the case may be, acceptance, enforceability and enforcement of decisions, authentic instruments and court settlements.
Da bi uresničili te cilje, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi združiti določbe o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju oziroma sprejemljivosti, izvršljivosti in izvrševanju odločb, javnih listin in sodnih poravnav.
This Regulation does not define ‘marriage’, which is defined by the national laws of the Member States.
Ta uredba ne opredeljuje „zakonske zveze“, ki je opredeljena v nacionalnem pravu držav članic.
The scope of this Regulation should include all civil-law aspects of matrimonial property regimes, both the daily management of matrimonial property and the liquidation of the regime, in particular as a result of the couple's separation or the death of one of the spouses.
Področje uporabe te uredbe bi moralo zajemati vsa civilnopravna vprašanja premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema, tako glede vsakodnevnega upravljanja premoženja zakoncev kot glede likvidacije njunih premoženjskih razmerij, zlasti ob razvezi ali smrti enega od zakoncev.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the term ‘matrimonial property regime’ should be interpreted autonomously and should encompass not only rules from which the spouses may not derogate but also any optional rules to which the spouses may agree in accordance with the applicable law, as well as any default rules of the applicable law.
V tej uredbi bi se moral izraz „premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema“ razlagati kot avtonomen pojem in ne bi smel zajemati le pravil, od katerih zakonca ne smeta odstopati, temveč tudi vsa neobvezna pravila, o katerih se lahko dogovorita po pravu, ki se uporablja, in vsa dispozitivna pravila prava, ki se uporablja.
It includes not only property arrangements specifically and exclusively envisaged by certain national legal systems in the case of marriage but also any property relationships, between the spouses and in their relations with third parties, resulting directly from the matrimonial relationship, or the dissolution thereof.
Ne vključuje le ureditve premoženjskih razmerij, ki jo za zakonsko zvezo posebej in izključno predvidevajo nekateri nacionalni pravni sistemi, temveč tudi vse premoženjske odnose med zakoncema in v njunem razmerju do tretjih oseb, ki neposredno izvirajo iz sklenitve zakonske zveze ali njenega prenehanja.
For reasons of clarity, a number of questions which could be seen as having a link with matters of matrimonial property regime should be explicitly excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Zaradi jasnosti bi morala biti nekatera vprašanja, ki bi jih bilo mogoče povezati s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema, izrecno izključena iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
Accordingly, this Regulation should not apply to questions of general legal capacity of the spouses; however, this exclusion should not cover the specific powers and rights of either or both spouses with regard to property, either as between themselves or as regards third parties, as these powers and rights should fall under the scope of this Regulation.
Ta uredba se tako ne bi smela uporabljati za vprašanja splošne pravne in poslovne sposobnosti zakoncev; vendar pa to izvzetje ne bi smelo zajemati posebnih pooblastil in pravic enega ali obeh zakoncev v zvezi s premoženjem, bodisi med njima bodisi v razmerju do tretjih oseb, saj bi morala ta pooblastila in pravice spadati v področje uporabe te uredbe.
This Regulation should not apply to other preliminary questions such as the existence, validity or recognition of a marriage, which continue to be covered by the national law of the Member States, including their rules of private international law.
Ta uredba se ne bi smela uporabljati za druga predhodna vprašanja, kot so obstoj, veljavnost ali priznanje zakonske zveze, kar še naprej urejajo nacionalno pravo držav članic in njihova pravila mednarodnega zasebnega prava.
As maintenance obligations between spouses are governed by Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 [6], they should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation, as should issues relating to the succession to the estate of a deceased spouse, since they are covered by Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
Ker preživninske obveznosti med zakoncema ureja Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 4/2009 [6], bi jih bilo treba izvzeti iz področja uporabe te uredbe, enako pa velja za vprašanja, povezana z dedovanjem zapuščine po pokojnem zakoncu, saj jih ureja Uredba (EU) št. 650/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7].
Issues of entitlements to transfer or adjustment between spouses of rights to retirement or disability pension, whatever their nature, accrued during marriage and which have not generated pension income during the marriage are matters that should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation, taking into account the specific systems existing in the Member States.
Vprašanja, ali se lahko pravice do starostne ali invalidske pokojnine – ne glede na njihov značaj –, ki so bile pridobljene v času trajanja zakonske zveze in na podlagi katerih v času trajanja zakonske zveze ni prišlo do izplačila pokojnine, med zakoncema prenesejo ali prilagodijo, bi morala ostati izključena iz področja uporabe te uredbe, upoštevajoč specifične sisteme v državah članicah.
However, this exclusion should be strictly interpreted.
Vendar bi se morala ta izključitev ozko razlagati.
Hence, this Regulation should govern in particular the issue of classification of pension assets, the amounts that have already been paid to one spouse during the marriage, and the possible compensation that would be granted in case of a pension subscribed with common assets.
Zato bi morala ta uredba urejati zlasti vprašanje razvrstitve pokojninskih sredstev, zneske, ki so bili že plačani zakoncu med trajanjem zakonske zveze, in morebitno nadomestilo, ki bi bilo odobreno v primeru skupnega plačevanja pokojninskih prispevkov.
This Regulation should allow for the creation or the transfer resulting from the matrimonial property regime of a right in immoveable or moveable property as provided for in the law applicable to the matrimonial property regime.
Ta uredba bi morala omogočati ustanovitev ali prenos pravice na nepremičnini ali premičnini, ki izvira iz premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema, kot je določeno v pravu, ki se uporablja za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema.
A Member State should not be required to recognise a right in rem relating to property located in that Member State if the right in rem in question is not known in its law.
Državi članici ne bi bilo treba priznati stvarne pravice na premoženju, ki je v tej državi članici, če njeno pravo takšne stvarne pravice ne pozna.
However, in order to allow the spouses to enjoy in another Member State the rights which have been created or transferred to them as a result of the matrimonial property regime, this Regulation should provide for the adaptation of an unknown right in rem to the closest equivalent right under the law of that other Member State.
Da pa bi lahko zakonci v drugi državi članici uživali pravice, ki so bile ustanovljene ali so nanje prešle zaradi premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti, da se neznana stvarna pravica prilagodi najbolj enakovredni pravici po pravu te druge države članice.
In the context of such an adaptation, account should be taken of the aims and the interests pursued by the specific right in rem and the effects attached to it.
Pri takšni prilagoditvi bi bilo treba upoštevati namene in interese, ki se uresničujejo z določeno stvarno pravico, ter z njo povezane učinke.
For the purposes of determining the closest equivalent national right, the authorities or competent persons of the State whose law is applied to the matrimonial property regime may be contacted for further information on the nature and the effects of the right.
Organi ali pristojne osebe v državi, katere pravo se je uporabilo za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema, se lahko zaprosijo za dodatne informacije o naravi in učinkih stvarne pravice, če je to potrebno za določitev najbolj enakovredne nacionalne pravice.
The adaptation of unknown rights in rem as explicitly provided for by this Regulation should not preclude other forms of adaptation in the context of the application of this Regulation.
Prilagoditev neznanih stvarnih pravic, izrecno določena s to uredbo, ne bi smela izključevati drugih oblik prilagoditev v okviru uporabe te uredbe.
The requirements for the recording in a register of a right in immoveable or moveable property should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Zahteve za vpis pravice na nepremičnini ali premičnini v register bi bilo treba izključiti iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
It should therefore be the law of the Member State in which the register is kept (for immoveable property, the lex rei sitae) which determines under what legal conditions, and how, the recording must be carried out and which authorities, such as land registers or notaries, are in charge of checking that all requirements are met and that the documentation presented or established is sufficient or contains the necessary information.
Zato bi moralo zakonske pogoje in način vpisa pravice ter organe, kot so zemljiške knjige ali notarji, ki so pristojni, da preverijo, ali so izpolnjene vse zahteve in ali je predložena ali veljavna dokumentacija zadostna oziroma vsebuje vse potrebne informacije, določati pravo države članice, v kateri se vodi register (za nepremičnine lex rei sitae).
In particular, the authorities may check that the right of a spouse to a property mentioned in the document presented for registration is a right which is recorded as such in the register or which is otherwise demonstrated in accordance with the law of the Member State in which the register is kept.
Organi lahko zlasti preverijo, ali je pravica zakonca na premoženju, ki je navedena v listini, predloženi za vpis, vpisana v register ali kako drugače izkazana v skladu s pravom države članice, v kateri se vodi register.
In order to avoid duplication of documents, the registration authorities should accept such documents, drawn up in another Member State by the competent authorities the circulation of which is provided for by this Regulation.
Da ne bi prišlo do podvajanja listin, bi morali organi, pristojni za vpis, priznati listine, ki jih sestavijo pristojni organi v drugi državi članici in katerih obtok je predviden v tej uredbi.
This should not preclude the authorities involved in the registration from asking the person applying for registration to provide such additional information, or to present such additional documents, as are required under the law of the Member State in which the register is kept, for instance information or documents relating to the payment of revenue.
To ne pomeni, da organi, pristojni za vpis, ne morejo zahtevati, naj oseba, ki zaprosi za vpis, zagotovi dodatne informacije ali predloži dodatne listine, ki se zahtevajo po pravu države članice, v kateri se vodi register, na primer informacije ali listine v zvezi s plačilom davka.
Thus, where, for example, the acquisition of a right in immoveable property requires a recording in a register under the law of the Member State in which the register is kept in order to ensure the erga omnes effect of registers or to protect legal transactions, the moment of such acquisition should be governed by the law of that Member State.
Če je torej po pravu države članice, ki vodi register, pridobitev pravice na nepremičnini treba vpisati v register, da se zagotovi učinek erga omnes takega vpisa ali da se zaščitijo pravni posli, pravo te države določa, kdaj se takšna pravica pridobi.
This Regulation should respect the different systems for dealing with matters of the matrimonial property regime applied in the Member States.
Ta uredba bi morala upoštevati različne sisteme za urejanje premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the term ‘court’ should therefore be given a broad meaning so as to cover not only courts in the strict sense of the word, exercising judicial functions, but also for example notaries in some Member States who, in certain matters of matrimonial property regime, exercise judicial functions like courts, and the notaries and legal professionals who, in some Member States, exercise judicial functions in a given matrimonial property regime by delegation of power by a court.
Zato bi moral imeti izraz „sodišče“ v tej uredbi širok pomen, tako da se ne bi nanašal le na sodišča v pravem pomenu besede, ki izvajajo sodne funkcije, temveč na primer tudi na notarje v nekaterih državah članicah, ki v nekaterih zadevah v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema tako kot sodišča izvajajo sodne funkcije, ter v nekaterih državah članicah na notarje in pravne strokovnjake, ki pri urejanju premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema izvajajo sodne funkcije na podlagi prenosa pooblastil s strani sodišča.
Conversely, the term ‘court’ should not cover non-judicial authorities of a Member State empowered under national law to deal with matters of matrimonial property regime, such as the notaries in most Member States where, as is usually the case, they are not exercising judicial functions.
Nasprotno pa izraz „sodišče“ ne bi smel vključevati izvensodnih organov držav članic, ki so po nacionalnem pravu pooblaščeni za obravnavanje premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema, kot so notarji v večini držav članic, če navadno ne izvajajo sodnih funkcij.
This Regulation should allow all notaries who are competent in matters of matrimonial property regime in the Member States to exercise such competence.
Ta uredba bi morala vsem notarjem, ki so pristojni za obravnavanje premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema v državah članicah, omogočiti izvajanje te pristojnosti.
Acts issued by notaries in matters of matrimonial property regime in the Member States should circulate in accordance with this Regulation.
Listine, ki jih notarji izdajo v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema v državah članicah, bi morale biti v obtoku v skladu s to uredbo.
When notaries exercise judicial functions they should be bound by the rules of jurisdiction set out in this Regulation, and the decisions they give should circulate in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation on recognition, enforceability and enforcement of decisions.
Kadar notarji izvajajo sodne funkcije, bi morala zanje veljati pravila o pristojnosti iz te uredbe, odločbe, ki jih izdajo, pa bi morale biti v obtoku v skladu z določbami te uredbe o priznavanju, izvršljivosti in izvrševanju odločb.
When notaries do not exercise judicial functions they should not be bound by those rules of jurisdiction, and the authentic instruments they issue should circulate in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation on authentic instruments.
Kadar notarji ne izvajajo sodnih funkcij, zanje ne bi smela veljati pravila o pristojnosti, javne listine, ki jih izdajo, pa bi morale biti v obtoku v skladu z določbami te uredbe o javnih listinah.
To reflect the increasing mobility of couples during their married life and facilitate the proper administration of justice, the rules on jurisdiction set out in in this Regulation should enable citizens to have their various related procedures handled by the courts of the same Member State.
Zaradi vse večje mobilnosti parov v času zakonske zveze in olajšanja pravilnega delovanja pravosodja bi morala pravila o pristojnosti, določena v tej uredbi, omogočati državljanom, da njihove med seboj povezane postopke obravnavajo sodišča iste države članice.