natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It applies to the production and placing on the market of live animals and products of animal origin and in certain specific cases to exports thereof.
Uporablja se za proizvodnjo ter dajanje na trg živih živali in proizvodov živalskega izvora ter v nekaterih posebnih primerih za njihov izvoz.
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 lays down the criteria based on which the BSE status of countries or regions shall be determined in accordance with Article 5(2) of that Regulation.
Priloga II k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 določa merila, na podlagi katerih se v skladu s členom 5(2) navedene uredbe določi BSE-status držav ali regij.
Those criteria are based on the conditions set out in the chapter on bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code of the World Animal Health Organisation (OIE).
Navedena merila temeljijo na pogojih iz poglavja o bovini spongiformni encefalopatiji (BSE) Zoosanitarnega kodeksa za kopenske živali Mednarodne organizacije za zdravje živali (OIE).
In May 2015, the OIE World Assembly of Delegates amended the BSE Chapter of the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code, by adding the following sentence in Article 11.4.1 of the Code: ‘For the purpose of official BSE risk status recognition, BSE excludes “atypical BSE” as a condition believed to occur spontaneously in all cattle populations at a very low rate’ [2].
Maja 2015 je generalna skupščina delegatov OIE spremenila poglavje o BSE Zoosanitarnega kodeksa za kopenske živali OIE, in sicer je v členu 11.4.1 Kodeksa dodala naslednji stavek: „Za namen uradnega priznanja statusa tveganja za BSE je pri BSE izključena ‘atipična BSE’ kot stanje, ki naj bi se pri vseh populacijah goveda spontano pojavljalo v zelo majhnem obsegu.“ [2] Atipično BSE bi bilo torej treba izključiti iz opredelitve „BSE“ za namene Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001.
Atypical BSE should therefore be excluded from the definition of ‘BSE’ for the purpose of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Priloge III, V in VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 vsebujejo številna sklicevanja na Direktivo Sveta 64/433/EGS [3], Uredbo (ES) št. 1774/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] ter Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1974/2006 [5].
Annexes III, V and VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 contain a number of references to Council Directive 64/433/EEC [3], Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 [5].
Ker so bili navedeni trije akti razveljavljeni, bi bilo treba sklicevanja v prilogah k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 posodobiti.
As those three acts have been repealed, references in the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 should be updated.
Posebne zahteve, določene v Prilogi V k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001, glede odstranitve snovi s specifičnim tveganjem za govedo s poreklom iz držav članic z zanemarljivim tveganjem za BSE, so bile spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) 2015/1162 [6].
The specific requirements set out in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, concerning to the removal of specified risk material for bovine animals whose origin is in Member States with a negligible BSE risk, was amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1162 [6].
Zaradi te spremembe bi bilo treba spremeniti tudi nekatere določbe iz Priloge V in Priloge IX k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001, ki se nanašajo na odstranitev snovi s specifičnim tveganjem, kakor je opisano v nadaljevanju.
As a consequence of this amendment, certain provisions relating to the removal of specified risk material set out in Annex V and in Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 should also be amended, as developed below.
Prvič, v skladu s spremembo posebnih zahtev za države članice s statusom zanemarljivega tveganja za BSE, ki so določene v Prilogi V k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001, z Uredbo (EU) 2015/1162 tonzile niso več opredeljene kot snovi s specifičnim tveganjem za govedo s poreklom iz držav članic z zanemarljivim tveganjem za BSE.
First, in accordance with the amendment made to the specific requirements for Member States with a negligible BSE risk status set out in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, by Regulation (EU) 2015/1162, tonsils are no longer defined as specified risk material for bovine animals whose origin is in Member States with negligible BSE risk.
Prečni rez pred podaljškom osnovne jezične kosti za jezike goveda, ki se zahteva v skladu s točko 7 Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001, bi se zato moral uporabljati samo za govedo s poreklom iz držav članic z nadzorovanim ali nejasnim tveganjem za BSE.
The transverse cut rostral to the lingual process of the basihyoid bone for tongues of bovine animals, required in accordance with point 7 of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, should therefore only apply to bovine animals whose origin is in Member States with controlled or undetermined BSE risk.
Točko 7 Priloge V bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Point 7 of that Annex V should therefore be amended accordingly.
Drugič, v skladu s spremembo Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 z Uredbo (EU) 2015/1162 je hrbtenica opredeljena kot snov s specifičnim tveganjem samo za manjšino goveda v Uniji.
Second, in accordance with the amendment made to Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, by Regulation (EU) 2015/1162, the vertebral column is defined as specified risk material only for a minority of bovine animals in the Union.
Ob upoštevanju razvoja epidemioloških razmer v Uniji in potrebe po zmanjšanju upravnega bremena za nosilce dejavnosti se zahteva iz točke 11.3(a) Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001, da se na oznaki trupov zagotovijo informacije glede odstranitve hrbtenice, spremeni, kot sledi: trenutno velja, da mora oznaka govejih trupov ali kosov trupov s hrbtenico za veleprodajo vsebovati modro črto, kadar se odstranitev hrbtenice ne zahteva, po prehodnem obdobju pa bo veljalo, da mora oznaka govejih trupov ali kosov govejih trupov za veleprodajo vsebovati rdečo črto, kadar se odstranitev hrbtenice zahteva.
Taking into account the evolution of the epidemiological situation in the Union and the need to reduce administrative burden on operators, the requirement set out in point 11.3.(a) of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, to provide information on the label of the carcasses as regards the removal of the vertebral column, should be modified as follows: while so far a blue stripe must be indicated on the label of the carcasses or wholesale cuts of carcasses of bovine animals containing vertebral column when the removal of the vertebral column is not required, after a transitional period, a red stripe should be indicated on the label of the carcases or wholesale cuts of carcasses of bovine animals containing vertebral column when the removal of the vertebral column is required.
Isto spremembo zahteve po označevanju z modro črto, kadar se odstranitev hrbtenice ne zahteva, v zahtevo po označevanju z rdečo črto, kadar se odstranitev hrbtenice zahteva, bi bilo treba uporabiti tudi za proizvode govejega izvora, uvožene v Unijo.
The same modification from a requirement to indicate a blue stripe when the removal of the vertebral column is not required to a requirement to indicate a red stripe when the removal of the vertebral column is required, should apply for products of bovine origin imported into the Union.
Točko 3 oddelka C in točko 3 oddelka D poglavja C Priloge IX k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Point 3 of Section C and point 3 of Section D of Chapter C of Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Da bi gospodarskim subjektom in pristojnim organom zunaj in znotraj Unije zagotovili potreben čas za prilagoditev na to novo ureditev glede zahteve po označevanju z rdečo črto, kadar se odstranitev hrbtenice zahteva, bi ta določba morala začeti veljati po prehodnem obdobju, ki se izteče 30. junija 2017.
In order to give economic operators and competent authorities inside and outside the Union the necessary time to adjust to this new regime of red stripe required when the removal of the vertebral column is required, this provision should enter into force after a transitional period until 30 June 2017.
Člen 8(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 999/2001 v državah članicah ali njihovih regijah z nadzorovanim ali nejasnim tveganjem za BSE za govedo, ovce in koze, katerih meso je namenjeno prehrani ljudi ali živali, prepoveduje prakso uničenja, po omamljanju, centralnega živčnega tkiva s podolgovatim paličastim instrumentom, ki prodre v kranialno votlino, ali z vbrizgavanjem plina v kranialno votlino.
Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 prohibits the practice, in Member States or regions thereof, with a controlled or undetermined BSE risk, of lacerating, after stunning, central nervous tissues by means of an elongated rod-shaped instrument introduced into the cranial cavity, or by means of gas injection into the cranial cavity, of bovine, ovine and caprine animals whose meat is intended for human or animal consumption.
Točka 6 Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 navedeno prepoved razširja na države članice z zanemarljivim tveganjem za BSE, dokler se vse države članice ne opredelijo kot države z zanemarljivim tveganjem za BSE.
Point 6 of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 extends that prohibition to Member States with a negligible BSE risk, until all Member States are classified as countries with negligible BSE risk.
Ker se atipična BSE šteje za spontano bolezen, ki se z nizko prevalenco pojavlja tudi v državah z zanemarljivim tveganjem za BSE, bi se morala navedena prepoved še naprej uporabljati tudi po tem, ko bodo vse države članice opredeljene kot države z zanemarljivim tveganjem za BSE.
Since atypical BSE is considered a spontaneous disease which occurs at a low prevalence also in countries with a negligible BSE risk, that prohibition should remain applicable after all Member States have been classified as countries with a negligible BSE risk.
Točko 6 Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 bi bilo zato treba spremeniti, da se odpravi ta časovna omejitev.
Point 6 of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 should therefore be amended to remove this time limitation.
Točka 2 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 določa pravila glede priznanja statusa zanemarljivega tveganja za klasični praskavec za države članice ali območja držav članic.
Point 2 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 sets out the rules relating to the approval of the negligible risk status for classical scrapie of Member States or zones of a Member State.
Finska in Švedska sta 25. junija 2014 oz. 24. avgusta 2014 Komisiji predložili vlogo za priznanje statusa zanemarljivega tveganja za klasični praskavec.
On 25 June 2014 and 24 August 2014, Finland and Sweden respectively submitted an application to the Commission to be recognised as having a negligible risk status for classical scrapie.
Komisija je 13. januarja 2015 zaprosila za znanstveno in tehnično pomoč Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija), da bi ocenila, ali sta Finska in Švedska v svojih vlogah dokazali skladnost s točko 2.1(c) in točko 2.2 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001.
On 13 January 2015, the Commission requested the scientific and technical assistance of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to evaluate whether Finland and Sweden, in their respective applications, demonstrated compliance with point 2.1.(c) and point 2.2 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Agencija je v odgovor na zahtevo Komisije 19. novembra 2015 objavila dve znanstveni poročili [7] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: poročili Agencije).
On 19 November 2015, the EFSA published two scientific reports in response to the Commission's request [7] (‘the EFSA reports’).
Agencija je v navedenih poročilih ugotovila, da je glede na občutljivost prekušanja iz preteklih ocen Agencije in Inštituta za referenčne materiale in meritve (IRMM) Skupnega raziskovalnega središča v zvezi s presejalnimi diagnostičnimi testi Švedska dokazala skladnost s točko 2.1(c) oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 za vsako od zadnjih sedmih let in da je Finska dokazala tako skladnost za vsako od zadnjih sedmih let, razen za leto 2010, za katero je raven zaupanja za odkrivanje klasičnega praskavca pri prevalenci nad 0,1 % znašala 94,73 %.
The EFSA reports conclude that, based on the testing sensitivity provided by the past evaluations of screening diagnostic tests by the EFSA and the Joint Research Centre Institute for Reference Materials and Measurement (IRMM), Sweden demonstrated compliance with point 2.1.(c) of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 for each of the preceding seven years, and Finland demonstrated such compliance for each of the preceding seven years, except for 2010, a year during which the level of confidence of detecting classical scrapie at a prevalence rate exceeding 0,1 per cent was 94,73 per cent.
Ker je razlika med 94,73-odstotno in 95-odstotno ravnjo zaupanja zanemarljiva, kar zadeva tveganje, da se spregleda primer klasičnega praskavca, in ker je bilo merilo iz točke 2.1(c) oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 v vseh ostalih šestih letih izpolnjeno, se merilo lahko šteje za izpolnjeno v zadnjih sedmih letih.
As the difference between a level of confidence of 94,73 per cent and of 95 per cent is negligible when it comes to the risk of missing a case of classical scrapie, and as the criterion of point 2.1.(c) of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 was fulfilled in all six other years, the criterion can be considered as fulfilled for the past 7 years.
V poročilih Agencije je prav tako ugotovljeno, da so glede na občutljivost preskušanja iz preteklih ocen Agencije in IRMM v zvezi s presejalnimi diagnostičnimi testi nameni Švedske in Finske, kar zadeva nadzor klasičnega praskavca v prihodnosti, v skladu s točko 2.2 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001.
The EFSA reports also conclude that, based on the testing sensitivity provided by the past evaluations of screening diagnostic tests by the EFSA and the IRMM, Sweden and Finland's intentions concerning surveillance of classical scrapie in the future would comply with point 2.2 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Ob upoštevanju poročil Agencije in pozitivne ocene Komisije glede navedenih vlog v zvezi z drugimi merili iz točke 2.1 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 bi bilo treba Finsko in Švedsko opredeliti kot državi članici z zanemarljivim tveganjem za klasični praskavec.
Taking into account the EFSA reports and the favourable outcome of the Commission assessment of those applications with the other criteria set out in point 2.1 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, Finland and Sweden should be listed as Member States with a negligible risk of classical scrapie.
V točki 3.2 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 so navedene države članice z odobrenim nacionalnim programom nadzora klasičnega praskavca.
Point 3.2 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 lists the Member States with an approved national control programme for classical scrapie.
Ker bi bilo treba Finsko in Švedsko zdaj navesti v točki 2.3 navedenega oddelka kot državi članici z zanemarljivim tveganjem za klasični praskavec, bi ju bilo treba črtati s seznama držav članic z odobrenim nacionalnim programom nadzora klasičnega praskavca iz točke 3.2 navedenega oddelka, saj navedeni status zagotavlja jamstva, ki presegajo jamstva odobrenega nacionalnega programa nadzora.
As Finland and Sweden should now be listed in point 2.3 of that Section as Member States with a negligible risk of classical scrapie, they should be deleted from the list of Member States with an approved national control programme for classical scrapie in point 3.2 of that Section, as that status offers guarantees exceeding those provided by an approved national control programme.
V točkah 1.2 in 1.3 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 so določeni pogoji, ki jih morajo gospodarstva izpolnjevati, da se jim lahko prizna status zanemarljivega ali nadzorovanega tveganja za klasični praskavec.
Points 1.2 and 1.3 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 set out the conditions to be fulfilled for a holding to be recognised as having a negligible risk or a controlled risk of classical scrapie.
V točki 4 navedenega oddelka so določeni pogoji v zvezi s praskavcem, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni za trgovino znotraj Unije z ovcami in kozami ter njihovim semenom in zarodki.
Point 4 of that Section sets out the scrapie-related conditions to be fulfilled for intra-Union trade in ovine and caprine animals and semen and embryos thereof.
Poleg tega člen 3(1)(i) Uredbe (ES) št. 999/2001 gospodarstvo opredeljuje kot kateri koli prostor, namenjen za nastanitev, rejo, vzrejo, predstavitev javnosti živali, ki jih zajema navedena uredba, ali ravnanje z njimi.
In addition, Article 3(1)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 defines a holding as any place in which animals covered by that Regulation are held, kept, bred, handled or shown to the public.
Osemenjevalna središča in živalske vrtove je zato treba šteti za gospodarstva in zanje morajo veljati pogoji, določeni v oddelku A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001.
Semen collection centres, as well as zoos, must therefore be considered as holdings, and subject to conditions set out in Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Ker je tveganje za širjenje praskavca prek samcev ovac in koz v osemenjevalnih središčih, ki so odobrena in nadzorovana v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v Prilogi D k Direktivi Sveta 92/65/EGS [8], omejeno, je primerno, da se v oddelku A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 določijo posebni pogoji za osemenjevalna središča.
Given that the risk of spreading scrapie via male ovine and caprine animals kept at semen collection centres approved and supervised in accordance with the conditions set out in Annex D to Council Directive 92/65/EEC [8] is limited, it is appropriate to establish specific conditions for semen collection centres in Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Ti posebni pogoji bi morali zagotoviti, da se na gospodarstvo z zanemarljivim oz. nadzorovanim tveganjem za klasični praskavec lahko vnesejo ovce in koze iz osemenjevalnega središča, če (i) je osemenjevalno središče odobreno in nadzorovano v skladu s Prilogo D k Direktivi 92/65/EGS; (ii) na njem v zadnjih sedmih oziroma treh letih ni bilo nobenega primera klasičnega praskavca; (iii) so bile v osemenjevalno središče v zadnjih sedmih oziroma treh letih vnesene samo naslednje ovce in koze: ovce in koze z gospodarstev, na katerih so ovce in koze trajno označene in evidentirane ter na katerih se vodi tudi evidenca premikov ovac in koz na gospodarstvo in z njega, na katerih v zadnjih sedmih oziroma treh letih ni bil ugotovljen noben primer klasičnega praskavca ter na katerih je uradni veterinar ali veterinar, ki ga pooblasti pristojni organ, izvajal redne preglede; (iv) ima osemenjevalno središče vzpostavljene ukrepe za biološko zaščito, ki zagotavljajo, da ovce in koze z gospodarstev z različnim statusom glede praskavca niso v stiku v osemenjevalnem središču.
These specific conditions should provide that a holding with a negligible, respectively controlled, risk of classical scrapie may introduce ovine and caprine animals from a semen collection centre provided that: (i) the semen collection centre is approved and supervised in accordance with Annex D to Directive 92/65/EEC; (ii) the semen collection centre has had no case of classical scrapie for the last seven, respectively three years; (iii) only the following ovine and caprine animals were introduced into the semen collection centre for the last seven, respectively three years: ovine and caprine animals from holdings where ovine and caprine animals are permanently marked and records are maintained, where records of movements of ovine and caprine animals in and out the holding are maintained, where no case of classical scrapie have been detected in the last seven, respectively three years, and which were subjected to regular checks by an official veterinarian or a veterinarian authorised by the competent authority; (iv) the semen collection centre has biosecurity measures in place to ensure that ovine and caprine animals coming from holdings with different scrapie statuses are not in contact in the semen collection centre.
Točki 1.2(c) in 1.3(c) oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Points 1.2.(c) and 1.3.(c) of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 should be amended accordingly.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba spremeniti pogoje v zvezi s praskavcem za trgovino znotraj Unije s semenom in zarodki, ki so določeni v točki 4.2 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001, da se bodo upoštevali posebni pogoji za osemenjevalna središča, omenjeni v zgornji uvodni izjavi.
In addition, the scrapie-related intra-Union trade conditions for semen and embryos, laid down in point 4.2 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, should be amended to take into account the specific conditions for semen collection centres mentioned in the above recital.
Prav tako bi bilo treba sklicevanje na navedene posebne pogoje vključiti v pogoje za uvoz semena in zarodkov ovac in koz, ki so določeni v Poglavju H Priloge IX k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001.
Furthermore, reference to those specific conditions should also be introduced in the conditions for import of semen and embryos of ovine and caprine animals set out in Chapter H of Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Pogoji za trgovino znotraj Unije z ovcami in kozami iz točke 4.1 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 so namenjeni preprečevanju širjenja klasičnega praskavca pri farmsko gojenih živalih na gospodarstvih.
The conditions for intra-Union trade in ovine and caprine animals provided for in point 4.1 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 are aimed at preventing the spread of classical scrapie in farmed animals kept on holdings.
Ker premiki ovac in koz izključno med živalskimi vrtovi ne vplivajo na status glede praskavca farmsko gojenih ovac in koz v Uniji, se navedeni posebni pogoji ne bi smeli uporabljati za ovce in koze, ki so v živalskih vrtovih in se premikajo izključno med živalskimi vrtovi, kot so zajeti v opredelitvi uradno odobrenih ustanov, inštitutov ali središč iz člena 2(1)(c) Direktive Sveta 92/65/EGS.
Since the movement of ovine and caprine animals exclusively between zoos has no impact on the scrapie status of the Union ovine and caprine farmed animals, those specific conditions should not apply to ovine and caprine animals kept in and moved exclusively between zoos as covered by the definition of approved bodies, institutes or centres provided in Article 2(1)(c) to Council Directive 92/65/EEC.
Navedene živali bi bilo zato treba izvzeti iz pogojev, določenih v točki 4.1 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001.
Those animals should therefore be exempted from the conditions set out in point 4.1 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Zahteve glede praskavca za trgovino znotraj Unije z živimi ovcami in kozami iz točke 4.1 oddelka A poglavja A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 je težko izpolnjevati pri trgovini znotraj Unije z nekaterimi redkimi pasmami.
The scrapie requirements for intra-Union trade in live ovine and caprine animals set out in point 4.1 of Section A of Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 is difficult to comply with for intra-Union trade in certain rare breeds.
Da bi se izognili parjenju med sorodstvom in ohranili gensko raznovrstnost populacij redkih pasem, je potrebna redna izmenjava takih živali med državami članicami.