natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The EPPO shall inform the competent national authorities without undue delay of any decision to exercise or to refrain from exercising its competence.
obstaja razlog za domnevo, da škoda, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena finančnim interesom Unije s kaznivim dejanjem iz člena 22, ne presega škode, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena drugi žrtvi.
In the case of disagreement between the EPPO and the national prosecution authorities over the question of whether the criminal conduct falls within the scope of Article 22(2), or (3) or Article 25(2) or (3), the national authorities competent to decide on the attribution of competences concerning prosecution at national level shall decide who is to be competent for the investigation of the case.
Točka (b) prvega pododstavka tega odstavka se ne uporablja za kazniva dejanja iz člena 3(2)(a), (b) in (d) Direktive (EU) 2017/1371, kakor se izvaja z nacionalnim pravom.
Member States shall specify the national authority which will decide on the attribution of competence.
EJT lahko s soglasjem pristojnih nacionalnih organov izvaja svojo pristojnost v zvezi kaznivimi dejanji iz člena 22 v zadevah, ki bi bile sicer izključene zaradi uporabe odstavka 3(b) tega člena, če se izkaže, da je EJT v boljšem položaju za izvedbo preiskave ali pregona.
CHAPTER V
EJT brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvesti pristojne nacionalne organe o vseh odločitvah glede izvajanja oziroma neizvajanja svoje pristojnosti.
RULES OF PROCEDURE ON INVESTIGATIONS, INVESTIGATION MEASURES, PROSECUTION AND ALTERNATIVES TO PROSECUTION
V primeru nesoglasja med EJT in nacionalnimi organi pregona glede tega, ali kaznivo ravnanje spada v področje uporabe člena 22(2)ali (3) ali člena 25(2) ali (3), nacionalni organi, pristojni za odločanje o dodelitvi pristojnosti glede pregona na nacionalni ravni, odločijo, kdo bo pristojen za preiskavo zadeve.
Rules on investigations
Države članice določijo, kateri nacionalni organ bo odločal o dodelitvi pristojnosti.
Initiation of investigations and allocation of competences within the EPPO
POSTOPKOVNA PRAVILA O PREISKAVAH, PREISKOVALNIH UKREPIH, PREGONU IN ALTERNATIVNIH UKREPIH NAMESTO PREGONA
Where, in accordance with the applicable national law, there are reasonable grounds to believe that an offence within the competence of the EPPO is being or has been committed, a European Delegated Prosecutor in a Member State which according to its national law has jurisdiction over the offence shall, without prejudice to the rules set out in Article 25(2) and (3), initiate an investigation and note this in the case management system.
Pravila o preiskavah
Where upon verification in accordance with Article 24(6), the EPPO decides to initiate an investigation, it shall without undue delay inform the authority that reported the criminal conduct in accordance with Article 24(1) or (2).
Člen 26
Where no investigation has been initiated by a European Delegated Prosecutor, the Permanent Chamber to which the case has been allocated shall, under the conditions set out in paragraph 1, instruct a European Delegated Prosecutor to initiate an investigation.
Začetek preiskav in delitev pristojnosti znotraj EJT
A case shall as a rule be initiated and handled by a European Delegated Prosecutor from the Member State where the focus of the criminal activity is or, if several connected offences within the competences of the EPPO have been committed, the Member State where the bulk of the offences has been committed.
Kadar v skladu z veljavnim nacionalnim pravom obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za domnevo, da se kaznivo dejanje, za katero je pristojno EJT, izvaja ali da je bilo tako kaznivo dejanje storjeno, evropski delegirani tožilec v tisti državi članici, ki je v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom pristojna za kaznivo dejanje, brez poseganja v pravila iz člena 25(2) in (3) začne preiskavo in to zabeleži v sistemu vodenja zadev.
A European Delegated Prosecutor of a different Member State that has jurisdiction for the case may only initiate or be instructed by the competent Permanent Chamber to initiate an investigation where a deviation from the rule set out in the previous sentence is duly justified, taking into account the following criteria, in order of priority:
Kadar se EJT po preverjanju v skladu s členom 24(6) odloči, da bo začelo preiskavo, o tem brez odlašanja obvesti organ, ki je poročal o kaznivem ravnanju v skladu s členom 24(1) ali (2).
the place of the suspect’s or accused person’s habitual residence;
Kadar evropski delegirani tožilec ni začel preiskave, stalni senat, ki mu je bila zadeva dodeljena, pod pogoji iz odstavka 1 naloži evropskemu delegiranemu tožilcu, da sproži preiskavo.
the nationality of the suspect or accused person;
Zadevo praviloma sproži in obravnava evropski delegirani tožilec iz države članice, v kateri je težišče kriminalne dejavnosti, ali, kadar je bilo storjenih več med seboj povezanih kaznivih dejanj, ki so v pristojnosti EJT, iz države članice, v kateri je bilo storjenih največ kaznivih dejanj.
the place where the main financial damage has occurred.
Evropski delegirani tožilec iz druge države članice, ki je pristojna za zadevo, sme začeti preiskavo ali mu pristojni stalni senat lahko naloži, da začne preiskavo, samo, kadar je odstopanje od pravila iz prejšnjega stavka ustrezno utemeljeno, ob upoštevanju naslednjih meril po naslednjem prednostnem vrstnem redu:
Until a decision to prosecute under Article 36 is taken, the competent Permanent Chamber may, in a case concerning the jurisdiction of more than one Member State and after consultation with the European Prosecutors and/or European Delegated Prosecutors concerned, decide to:
kraj, v katerem ima osumljenec ali obdolženec običajno prebivališče;
reallocate the case to a European Delegated Prosecutor in another Member State;
državljanstvo osumljenca ali obdolženca;
merge or split cases and, for each case choose the European Delegated Prosecutor handling it,
kraj, kjer je nastala glavna finančna škoda.
if such decisions are in the general interest of justice and in accordance with the criteria for the choice of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Article.
Dokler ni sprejeta odločitev o pregonu na podlagi člena 36, lahko pristojni stalni senat v zadevi, ki je v pristojnosti več kot ene države članice in po posvetovanju z zadevnimi evropskimi tožilci in/ali evropskimi delegiranimi tožilci, odloči, da:
Whenever the Permanent Chamber is taking a decision to reallocate, merge or split a case, it shall take due account of the current state of the investigations.
predodeli zadevo evropskemu delegiranemu tožilcu v drugi državi članici;
The EPPO shall inform the competent national authorities without undue delay of any decision to initiate an investigation.
združi ali razdruži zadeve in za vsako zadevo izbere evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki jo bo obravnaval,
Article 27
če so take odločitve v splošnem interesu pravičnosti in v skladu z merili za izbiro evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo v skladu z odstavkom 4 tega člena.
Right of evocation
Kadar stalni senat odloča o predodelitvi, združitvi ali razdružitvi zadeve, ustrezno upošteva trenutno stanje preiskav.
Upon receiving all relevant information in accordance with Article 24(2), the EPPO shall take its decision on whether to exercise its right of evocation as soon as possible, but no later than 5 days after receiving the information from the national authorities and shall inform the national authorities of that decision.
EJT brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvesti pristojne nacionalne organe o vsaki odločitvi, da bo sprožilo preiskavo.
The European Chief Prosecutor may in a specific case take a reasoned decision to prolong the time limit by a maximum period of 5 days, and shall inform the national authorities accordingly.
Člen 27
During the periods referred to in paragraph 1, the national authorities shall refrain from taking any decision under national law that may have the effect of precluding the EPPO from exercising its right of evocation.
Pravica do prevzema zadeve
The national authorities shall take any urgent measures necessary, under national law, to ensure effective investigation and prosecution.
EJT se po prejemu vseh ustreznih informacij v skladu s členom 24(2) čim prej, vendar najpozneje v petih dneh po prejemu informacij od nacionalnih organov, odloči, ali bo uveljavljalo pravico do prevzema zadeve, in o tej odločitvi obvesti nacionalne organe.
If the EPPO becomes aware, by means other than the information referred to in Article 24(2), of the fact that an investigation in respect of a criminal offence for which it could be competent is already undertaken by the competent authorities of a Member State, it shall inform these authorities without delay.
Evropski glavni tožilec lahko v posebnih primerih sprejme obrazloženo odločitev glede podaljšanje tega roka za največ pet dni in o tem ustrezno obvesti nacionalne organe.
After being duly informed in accordance with Article 24(2), the EPPO shall take a decision on whether to exercise its right of evocation.
Nacionalni organi se med tekom rokov iz odstavka 1 vzdržijo sprejemanja vseh odločitev na podlagi nacionalnega prava, katerih učinek bi lahko bil, da EJT ne bi moglo uveljavljati pravice do prevzema zadeve.
The decision shall be taken within the time limits set out in paragraph 1 of this Article.
Nacionalni organi sprejmejo vse nujne ukrepe, ki so na podlagi nacionalnega prava potrebni za zagotovitev učinkovite preiskave in pregona.
The EPPO shall, where appropriate, consult the competent authorities of the Member State concerned before deciding whether to exercise its right of evocation.
Če EJT kako drugače kot prek obvestila iz člena 24(2) izve, da so pristojni organi države članice že sprožili preiskavo kaznivega dejanja, za katero bi lahko bilo pristojno, o tem brez odlašanja obvesti te organe.
Where the EPPO exercises its right of evocation, the competent authorities of the Member States shall transfer the file to the EPPO and refrain from carrying out further acts of investigation in respect of the same offence.
Potem ko je bilo ustrezno obveščeno v skladu s členom 24(2), se EJT odloči, ali bo uveljavljalo pravico do prevzema zadeve.
The right of evocation set out in this Article may be exercised by a European Delegated Prosecutor from any Member State whose competent authorities have initiated an investigation in respect of an offence that falls within the scope of Articles 22 and 23.
To odločitev sprejme v rokih iz odstavka 1 tega člena.
Where a European Delegated Prosecutor, who has received the information in accordance with Article 24(2), considers not to exercise the right of evocation, he/she shall inform the competent Permanent Chamber through the European Prosecutor of his/her Member State with a view to enabling the Permanent Chamber to take a decision in accordance with Article 10(4).
Preden se odloči glede uveljavljanja pravice do prevzema zadeve, se EJT po potrebi posvetuje s pristojnimi organi zadevne države članice.
Where the EPPO has refrained from exercising its competence, it shall inform the competent national authorities without undue delay.
Če EJT uveljavlja pravico do prevzema zadeve, pristojni organi držav članic predajo spis EJT in ne izvajajo nadaljnjih preiskovalnih ukrepov v zvezi z istim kaznivim dejanjem.
At any time in the course of the proceedings, the competent national authorities shall inform the EPPO of any new facts which could give the EPPO reasons to reconsider its decision not to exercise competence.
Pravico do prevzema zadeve iz tega člena lahko uveljavlja evropski delegirani tožilec iz katere koli države članice, katere pristojni organi so začeli preiskavo kaznivega dejanja, ki spada v področje uporabe členov 22 in 23.
The EPPO may exercise its right of evocation after receiving such information, provided that the national investigation has not already been finalised and that an indictment has not been submitted to a court.
Kadar evropski delegirani tožilec, ki je bil obveščen v skladu s členom 24(2), ne namerava uveljavljati pravice do prevzema zadeve, o tem prek evropskega tožilca svoje države članice obvesti pristojni stalni senat, da bi ta lahko sprejel odločitev v skladu s členom 10(4).
The decision shall be taken within the time limit set out in paragraph 1.
Kadar se je EJT vzdrži izvajanja svoje pristojnosti, o tem brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvesti pristojne nacionalne organe.
Where, with regard to offences which caused or are likely to cause damage to the Union’s financial interests of less than EUR 100000, the College considers that, with reference to the degree of seriousness of the offence or the complexity of the proceedings in the individual case, there is no need to investigate or to prosecute at Union level, it shall in accordance with Article 9(2), issue general guidelines allowing the European Delegated Prosecutors to decide, independently and without undue delay, not to evoke the case.
Pristojni nacionalni organi kadar koli med postopkom obvestijo EJT o vseh novih dejstvih, na podlagi katerih bi EJT lahko spremenil svojo odločitev o neizvajanju pristojnosti.
The guidelines shall specify, with all necessary details, the circumstances to which they apply, by establishing clear criteria, taking specifically into account the nature of the offence, the urgency of the situation and the commitment of the competent national authorities to take all necessary measures in order to fully recover the damage to the Union’s financial interests.
EJT lahko po prejemu takšnega obvestila uveljavlja pravico do prevzema zadeve, pod pogojem, da nacionalna preiskava še ni zaključena in da na sodišče še ni vložena obtožnica.
To ensure coherent application of the guidelines, a European Delegated Prosecutor shall inform the competent Permanent Chamber of each decision taken in accordance with paragraph 8 and each Permanent Chamber shall report annually to the College on the application of the guidelines.
Odločitev se sprejme v roku iz odstavka 1.
Article 28
Kadar v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, ki so povzročila ali bi lahko povzročila škodo finančnim interesom Unije v višini manj kot 100000 EUR, kolegij glede na težo kaznivega dejanja ali zapletenost postopka v posamezni zadevi, meni, da preiskava ali pregon na ravni Unije nista potrebna, izda v skladu s členom 9(2) splošne smernice, ki evropskim delegiranim tožilcem omogočajo, da se samostojno in brez nepotrebnega odlašanja odločijo, da ne bodo prevzeli zadeve.
Conducting the investigation
V smernicah je treba ustrezno podrobno določiti, v katerih okoliščinah se uporabljajo, in oblikovati jasna merila, pri čemer je treba zlasti upoštevati naravo kaznivega dejanja, nujnost razmer in zavezo pristojnih nacionalnih organov, da sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za popolno povrnitev škode, ki je povzročena finančnim interesom Unije.
The European Delegated Prosecutor handling a case may, in accordance with this Regulation and with national law, either undertake the investigation measures and other measures on his/her own or instruct the competent authorities in his/her Member State.
Da se zagotovi usklajena uporaba smernic, evropski delegirani tožilec obvesti pristojni stalni senat o vsaki odločitvi, sprejeti v skladu z odstavkom 8, vsak stalni senat pa letno poroča kolegiju o uporabi smernic.
Those authorities shall, in accordance with national law, ensure that all instructions are followed and undertake the measures assigned to them.
Člen 28
The handling European Delegated Prosecutor shall report through the case management system to the competent European Prosecutor and to the Permanent Chamber any significant developments in the case, in accordance with the rules laid down in the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO.
Izvajanje preiskave
At any time during the investigations conducted by the EPPO, the competent national authorities shall take urgent measures in accordance with national law necessary to ensure effective investigations even where not specifically acting under an instruction given by the handling European Delegated Prosecutor.
1.
The national authorities shall without undue delay inform the handling European Delegated Prosecutor of the urgent measures they have taken.
Evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, lahko v skladu s to uredbo in nacionalnim pravom preiskovalne ukrepe in druge ukrepe sprejema sam ali to naloži pristojnim organom v svoji državi članici.
The competent Permanent Chamber may, on proposal of the supervising European Prosecutor decide to reallocate a case to another European Delegated Prosecutor in the same Member State when the handling European Delegated Prosecutor:
Ti organi v skladu z nacionalnim pravom zagotovijo, da se upoštevajo vsa navodila, in izvajajo ukrepe, ki so jim dodeljeni.
cannot perform the investigation or prosecution; or
Evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, prek sistema vodenja zadev poroča pristojnemu evropskemu tožilcu in stalnemu senatu o vsakem bistvenem razvoju zadeve v skladu s pravili, določenimi v poslovniku EJT.
fails to follow the instructions of the competent Permanent Chamber or the European Prosecutor.
Pristojni nacionalni organi kadar koli med preiskavo, ki jo izvaja EJT, sprejmejo nujne ukrepe v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, potrebne za zagotovitev učinkovite preiskave, tudi če ne ukrepajo izrecno na podlagi navodila evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo.
In exceptional cases, after having obtained the approval of the competent Permanent Chamber, the supervising European Prosecutor may take a reasoned decision to conduct the investigation personally, either by undertaking personally the investigation measures and other measures or by instructing the competent authorities in his/her Member State, where this appears to be indispensable in the interest of the efficiency to the investigation or prosecution by reasons of one or more of the following criteria:
Nacionalni organi brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvestijo evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo, o nujnih ukrepih, ki so jih sprejeli.
the seriousness of the offence, in particular in view of its possible repercussions at Union level;
Pristojni stalni senat lahko na predlog nadzorujočega evropskega tožilca odloči zadevo predodeliti drugemu evropskemu delegiranemu tožilcu v isti državi članici, če evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo:
when the investigation concerns officials or other servants of the Union or members of the institutions of the Union;
ne more opraviti preiskave ali pregona ali
in the event of failure of the reallocation mechanism provided for in paragraph 3.
ne upošteva navodil pristojnega stalnega senata ali evropskega tožilca.
In such exceptional circumstances Member States shall ensure that the European Prosecutor is entitled to order or request investigative measures and other measures and that he/she has all the powers, responsibilities and obligations of a European Delegated Prosecutor in accordance with this Regulation and national law.
V izjemnih primerih in po prejemu odobritve pristojnega stalnega senata, lahko nadzorujoči evropski tožilec sprejme obrazloženo odločitev, da bo osebno izvedel preiskavo, in sicer tako, da preiskovalne in druge ukrepe sprejema osebno ali to naloži pristojnim organom v svoji državi članici, če se to zdi nujno potrebno zaradi učinkovitosti preiskave ali pregona zaradi enega ali več naslednjih meril:
The competent national authorities and the European Delegated Prosecutors concerned by the case shall be informed without undue delay of the decision taken under this paragraph.
teža kaznivega dejanja, zlasti glede njegovih možnih posledic na ravni Unije;
Article 29
če preiskava zadeva uradnike ali druge uslužbence Unije ali člane institucij Unije;
Lifting privileges or immunities
če mehanizem predodelitve iz odstavka 3 ne deluje.
Where the investigations of the EPPO involve persons protected by a privilege or immunity under national law, and such privilege or immunity presents an obstacle to a specific investigation being conducted, the European Chief Prosecutor shall make a reasoned written request for its lifting in accordance with the procedures laid down by that national law.
V takšnih izjemnih okoliščinah države članice zagotovijo, da ima evropski tožilec pravico odrediti ali zahtevati preiskovalne ukrepe in druge ukrepe in da ima vsa pooblastila, pristojnosti in obveznosti evropskega delegiranega tožilca v skladu s to uredbo in nacionalnim pravom.
Where the investigations of the EPPO involve persons protected by privileges or immunities under the Union law, in particular the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union, and such privilege or immunity presents an obstacle to a specific investigation being conducted, the European Chief Prosecutor shall make a reasoned written request for its lifting in accordance with the procedures laid down by Union law.
Pristojni nacionalni organi in evropski delegirani tožilci, ki jih primer zadeva, se brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvestijo o odločitvi, sprejeti na podlagi tega odstavka.
Rules on investigation measures and other measures
Člen 29
Article 30
Odvzem privilegijev ali imunitet
Investigation measures and other measures
Kadar preiskave, ki jih izvaja EJT, vključujejo osebe, zaščitene s privilegijem ali imuniteto na podlagi nacionalnega prava, in tak privilegij ali imuniteta ovira izvedbo določene preiskave, evropski glavni tožilec poda obrazloženo pisno zahtevo za njen odvzem v skladu s postopki, določenimi v zadevnem nacionalnem pravu.
At least in cases where the offence subject to the investigation is punishable by a maximum penalty of at least 4 years of imprisonment, Member States shall ensure that the European Delegated Prosecutors are entitled to order or request the following investigation measures:
Kadar preiskave, ki jih izvaja EJT, vključujejo osebe, zaščitene s privilegiji ali imunitetami na podlagi prava Unije, zlasti Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije, in tak privilegij ali imuniteta ovira izvedbo določene preiskave, evropski glavni tožilec poda obrazloženo pisno zahtevo za njen odvzem v skladu s postopki, določenimi v pravu Unije.
search any premises, land, means of transport, private home, clothes and any other personal property or computer system, and take any conservatory measures necessary to preserve their integrity or to avoid the loss or contamination of evidence;
Pravila o preiskovalnih ukrepih in drugih ukrepih
obtain the production of any relevant object or document either in its original form or in some other specified form;
Člen 30
obtain the production of stored computer data, encrypted or decrypted, either in their original form or in some other specified form, including banking account data and traffic data with the exception of data specifically retained in accordance with national law pursuant to the second sentence of Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [20];
Preiskovalni ukrepi in drugi ukrepi
freeze instrumentalities or proceeds of crime, including assets, that are expected to be subject to confiscation by the trial court, where there is reason to believe that the owner, possessor or controller of those instrumentalities or proceeds will seek to frustrate the judgement ordering confiscation.
Vsaj v primerih, ko se kaznivo dejanje, ki je predmet preiskave, kaznuje z najvišjo predpisano sankcijo najmanj štirih let zapora, države članice zagotovijo, da imajo evropski delegirani tožilci pravico odrediti ali zahtevati naslednje preiskovalne ukrepe:
intercept electronic communications to and from the suspect or accused person, over any electronic communication means that the suspect or accused person is using;
preiskavo vseh prostorov, zemljišč, prevoznih sredstev, zasebnih prebivališč, oblek in drugega osebnega premoženja ali računalniškega sistema ter sprejetje vseh varnostnih ukrepov, ki so potrebni, da se ohrani njihova celovitost ali prepreči izguba ali okuženost dokazov;
track and trace an object by technical means, including controlled deliveries of goods.
zagotovitev predložitve vseh ustreznih predmetov ali dokumentov v izvirni obliki ali drugi posebej določeni obliki;