natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Only one Malaysian company agreed to cooperate but provided insufficient information.
Po drugi strani je CCCMC v stališčih po začasnem razkritju menila, da bi bili tajvanski podatki o proizvodnih stroških ustreznejša podlaga za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti kot podatki proizvajalcev Unije, ki jih je Komisija v začasnem razkritju prav tako obravnavala kot drugo možnost.
The company was not able to provide per PCN data with regard to costs and domestic prices.
Za Tajvan se je štelo, da je ustrezen kot primerljiva država, ker so v nasprotju s tem, kar so trdili pritožniki, in ne glede na različno uporabo surovin predloženi podatki omogočali metodologijo za pravilno razdelitev stroškov glede na različne značilnosti oznak izdelka.
Therefore, its deficient data could not be used for determination of the normal value.
Poleg tega je konkurenca na tajvanskem trgu velika, ker obstaja najmanj deset znanih domačih proizvajalcev zadevnega izdelka, to pa se kaže tudi v močni prisotnosti uvoza z različnim poreklom ob zmerni stopnji carinskih dajatev (od 7,5 % do 10 %).
Furthermore, it is noted that the Malaysian company in question has refused on spot verification of the data provided.
Iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov se je Komisija odločila, da bo kot primerljivo državo za LRK uporabila Tajvan.
At a later stage a Swiss producer came forward, as a potential analogue producer and agreed to cooperate.
Po dokončnem razkritju so dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika in CCCMC trdili, da izbira Tajvana kot primerljive države ni bila ustrezna, ker je proizvodne stroške predložila samo ena tajvanska družba, ki ni imela domače prodaje.
The company submitted the requested questionnaire reply which was verified on spot.
Trdili so tudi, da je bila stopnja ujemanja primerljivih izdelkov prenizka.
Nevertheless, due to the rather limited range of product types produced by this company compared to the wide range of product types exported by the sampled Chinese exporting producers to the Union, the Commission decided that the data provided by the Swiss company would be inappropriate for the determination of the normal value for the Chinese exporting producers.
Na nizko stopnjo ujemanja primerljivih izdelkov je opozoril tudi eden od uvoznikov Unije.
With this regard it is noted that only 4,6 % of product types exported to the Union by Chinese producers covering 4,2 % of Chinese export volume were directly matching with product types produced by the Swiss producer.
Zadnjenavedena družba je še navedla, da Kitajske ni mogoče primerjati s Tajvanom, ker imata različni stopnji indeksa človekovega razvoja („HDI“) in BDP na prebivalca.
In case of Taiwan, finally used as the analogue country, the level of direct matching with product types exported to the Union by the Chinese producers was 7,7 % for the number of product types and 11,1 % for the export volume.
V zvezi s temi trditvami je treba najprej opozoriti, da je v odločitvi STO [7] navedeno, da bi bilo treba vsem vrstam izdelka, ki jih izvažajo kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, dodeliti normalno vrednost.
In this situation, the Commission decided to use the other country subject to the investigation, i.e. Taiwan, as the analogue country despite arguments initially presented by the complainants claiming that Taiwanese companies mainly produced fittings types based on welded tubes as raw material (as opposed to the Chinese producers, which use mainly seamless tubes).
Po mnenju Komisije podatki, ugotovljeni na ravni enega proizvajalca izvoznika iz primerljive države, zadostujejo, da se nanje oprejo preostale vrste izdelka, ker ugotovljene vrste omogočajo nadaljnje konstruiranje vrednosti za manjkajoče vrste izdelka.
The same argument was put forward also by the Chinese exporting producers.
Pojav samo enega takega proizvajalca izvoznika nikakor ni izjemen ali nova praksa.
On the other hand, the CCCMC in its submission after provisional disclosure considered that the Taiwanese manufacturing cost data would be more appropriate for the basis of construction of the normal value than data of the Union producers, which was also considered by the Commission as an alternative in the provisional disclosure.
V osnovni uredbi je nadalje predvideno, da je mogoče normalno vrednost konstruirati na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje, kadar domače prodaje ni.
Taiwan was considered appropriate as an analogue country because, contrary to what was claimed by the complainants and notwithstanding the different use of raw materials, the data provided allowed for a proper attribution methodology of costs in relation to the different characteristic of the product coding.
Drugič, opozoriti je treba, da stopnje HDI in BDP niso dejavniki, ki se upoštevajo pri ugotavljanju, ali je primerljiva država ustrezna.
Furthermore, the level of competition on Taiwanese market is high since there are at least 10 known domestic producers of the product concerned and this is also reflected in a strong presence of imports from different origins, in a situation where the level of custom duties is moderate (7,5 % to 10 %).
Komisija ustrezno primerljivo državo določi, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 104.
For the reasons above, the Commission decided to use Taiwan as the analogue country for the PRC.
Zgornje trditve so bile zato zavrnjene.
The parties in question also submitted that the matching level of comparable products was too low.
Komisija v zvezi s tem opozarja, da nima diskrecijske pravice glede odločitve o uporabi ali neuporabi sedanjih pravil, kot so določena v osnovni uredbi.
The claim of low matching level of comparable products was also raised by one of the Union importer.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
The latter company indicated also that the China could not be compared to Taiwan as the two entities have different levels of Human Development Index (‘HDI’) and GDP per capita.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 103, je bila normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi konstruirane vrednosti v primerljivi državi, v tem primeru v Tajvanu.
With regard to these claims, it is first recalled that the WTO ruling [7] implies that all product types exported by the Chinese exporting producers should be assigned a normal value.
Poleg tega je bila zaradi neobstoja domače prodaje podobnega izdelka v Tajvanu normalna vrednost konstruirana v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe tako, da so se povprečnim proizvodnim stroškom za zadevno vrsto izdelka prišteli nastali PSA-stroški in dobiček, ustvarjen na tajvanskem trgu v obdobju preiskave.
The Commission considers that the data found at the level of one analogue country exporting producer is sufficient to base the remaining product types upon as the types found allow for further construction of the missing product types.
Komisija je kot podlago za določitev proizvodnih stroškov uporabila podatke enega od sodelujočih tajvanskih proizvajalcev (Ta Chen).
The occurrence of only one such exporting producer is by no means exceptional or a new practice.
Opozoriti je treba, da je imel drugi sodelujoči tajvanski proizvajalec (King Lai) v obdobju preiskave zelo omejen obseg proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka in da se je ta proizvodnja nanašala na zelo specializirane vrste izdelka.
The basic Regulation further foresees that the normal value can be constructed based on the cost of production, in the absence of domestic sales.
V tem majhnem delu proizvodnje, ki se še vedno šteje za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka, družba King Lai proizvaja izdelke, ki bi jih bilo mogoče šteti za pribor (fitinge) z majhno hrapavostjo, vendar se zaradi dodatne površinske obdelave njegova hrapavost poveča nad 0,8 mikrometra, tako da v skladu z opredelitvijo iz uvodne izjave 47 pomeni zadevni izdelek.
Secondly, it is recalled that the HDI and GDP levels are not factors which are taken into account in the establishment as to whether an analogue country is appropriate.
Proizvodnja tega pribora (fitingov) je zelo draga, tako da bi upoštevanje teh stroškov izkrivilo izračune.
In order to determine the proper analogue country, the Commission proceeds as explained in recital 104.
Poleg tega vzorčeni kitajski proizvajalci teh vrst izdelka ne izvažajo v EU (čeprav bi bili glede na svoje oznake PCN lahko zajeti, ker hrapavost ni eden od parametrov za sestavo oznake PCN).
The above claims were therefore rejected.
Zato Komisija podatkov o proizvodnih stroških te družbe ni štela za ustrezne za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti za kitajske proizvajalce.
Finally, two Chinese exporting producers and the CCCMC raised questions on allegedly a serious procedural flaw based on the fact that the Commission calculated the Chinese producers' dumping margins on the basis of the non-market economy (NME) provisions of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi s konstruiranjem normalne vrednosti je eden od uvoznikov Unije trdil, da proizvodnih stroškov tajvanske družbe King Lai ni mogoče uporabiti kot podlago za izračun normalne vrednosti za kitajske družbe, saj družba King Lai proizvaja drugačen izdelek, ki ga ni mogoče šteti za industrijski pribor (fiting), ter da to pomeni tudi drugačno proizvodno metodo in razpon dobička.
The parties claimed that the legal authority to apply NME methodology for the determination of normal value for the Chinese exporting producers expires on 11 December 2016.
V odgovor na to trditev je treba ponoviti, da Komisija za primerjavo z drugimi družbami ni uporabila nobenih podatkov o proizvodnih stroških družbe King Lai.
Therefore, according to the parties in question, for any definitive anti-dumping measures adopted after this date, which will be the case in this proceeding, the Commission is obliged under the WTO law to apply the standard dumping calculation methodology.
Komisija je za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti za druge družbe v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe uporabila samo PSA-stroške in dobiček družbe King Lai za enako splošno kategorijo izdelkov, ki se prodajajo na domačem trgu.
In this regard, the Commission notes that it has no discretion on whether or not to apply the current rules as set out in the basic Regulation.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da so bili PSA-stroški, uporabljeni za te izračune, prilagojeni, da bi se upoštevale razlike med izdelki, ki jih proizvajajo družba King Lai in druge družbe.
This claim was therefore rejected.
V zvezi z uporabljenim dobičkom je treba poudariti, da ni v drugačnem razponu (od 1 % do 5 %) kot pri drugih družbah.
As explained in recital 103, the normal value for the exporting producers in the PRC was determined on the basis of constructed value in the analogue country, in this case Taiwan, in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Isti uvoznik Unije je tudi trdil, da je drugi tajvanski proizvajalec, Ta Chen, katerega proizvodni stroški so bili uporabljeni kot podlaga za izračun normalne vrednosti za kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, velika in integrirana družba, ki je kot taka sposobna „optimizirati stroške“.
Furthermore, due to lack of domestic sales of the like product in Taiwan, normal value was constructed in line with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation by adding to the average cost of manufacturing of the relevant product type SG&A costs incurred and profit realised on the Taiwanese market during the investigation period.
Zato zadevne družbe ni mogoče primerjati z majhnimi kitajskimi tovarnami.
As a basis for establishing of manufacturing costs, the Commission used data of one of the cooperating Taiwanese producers (Ta Chen).
Komisija je v zvezi s tem opozorila, da proizvodni stroški kitajskih proizvajalcev niso bili del analize v tem postopku, ker ni nobeden od kitajskih proizvajalcev zahteval statusa TGO.
It should be noted that the second Taiwanese cooperating producer (King Lai) had very limited production volume of the product concerned in the investigation period and this production related to highly specialised product types.
Vendar je treba poudariti, da lahko domnevno „optimizirani“ stroški tajvanskega proizvajalca privedejo le do nižje konstruirane normalne vrednosti in s tem do nižjih stopenj dampinga za kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike.
In this small part of their production which is still considered product concerned King Lai is producing products which could be considered low-roughness fittings but with an extra surface treatment which makes their surface roughness to raise above 0,8 micrometer and thus according to the definition of recital 47 it is product concerned.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju, da je bilo mogoče v Tajvanu opredeliti le omejeno število vrst izdelka, ki so jih v Unijo izvažali kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, normalno vrednost preostalih vrst izdelka konstruirala na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje najbolj podobnih vrst izdelka, proizvedenih v Tajvanu, da bi dosegla popolno in pošteno primerjavo, in sicer na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje, prilagojenih za:
These fittings have very high costs of manufacturing and taking them into account would distort calculations.
razlike v uporabljenih surovinah – na podlagi preverjenih podatkov o stroških industrije Unije, pri čemer je proizvodnja pribora (fitingov) iz brezšivnih cevi od 2,12- do 2,97-krat dražja kot proizvodnja iz varjenih cevi;
Furthermore, these types of product are not exported by the Chinese sampled producers to the EU (although they might be covered by their PCNs as roughness is not one of the parameters of the PCN construction).
razlike v vrsti jekla – na podlagi preverjenih podatkov industrije Unije, pri čemer so stroški vrst jekla prilagojeni na stroške najmanj dragih vrst jekla, uporabljenih za pribor (fitinge), proizveden na podlagi varjenih cevi kot surovine; ta prilagoditev sega od 1,49- do 3,60-kratnika, odvisno od uporabljenih vrst jekla;
Therefore, manufacturing costs data of this company were considered by Commission as not appropriate for the construction of normal value for the Chinese producers.
razlike v obliki – na podlagi opaženih razlik v cenah v prodajnih poslih kitajskih izvoznikov, pri čemer koleno velja za najosnovnejšo obliko, druge oblike (T-kosi, redukcije, kapice in posebne oblike) pa so od 1,08- do 1,74-krat dražje.
With regard to the construction of the normal value, one Union importer claimed that manufacturing costs of the Taiwanese company King Lai could not be used as basis for calculation of the normal value for the Chinese companies as King Lai produces a different product which cannot be considered as industrial fitting and that it also implies a different production method and range of profits.
CCCMC je v stališčih po začasnem razkritju predlagala alternativno podlago za prilagoditve iz točk (a) in (b) ter v zvezi s tem predložila podatke s kitajskih trgov.
In response to this claim, it is reiterated that the Commission did not use any manufacturing costs data of King Lai for comparison with other companies.
Vendar so ti podatki, prvič, nepreverjeni in, drugič, izvirajo iz države brez tržnega gospodarstva.
For constructing the normal value of other companies, the Commission used only King Lai's SG&A costs and profit of the same general category of product sold on the domestic market, in accordance with Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Z njihovo uporabo bi se torej zanikala uporaba metodologije primerljive države za izračun normalne vrednosti.
It is also recalled that the SG&A cost used for these calculations was adjusted in order to take into account differences between the products produced by King Lai and other companies.
Ta trditev CCCMC je bila zato zavrnjena.
With regard to the profit used, it is stressed that is not in a different range (1 %-5 %) than those of other companies.
Po dokončnem razkritju so CCCMC in dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika trdili, da je bilo nerazumno tajvanske podatke o stroških prilagoditi z uporabo podatkov o stroških industrije Unije.
The same Union importer also claimed that the second Taiwanese producer, Ta Chen, whose manufacturing costs were used as the basis of calculation for the normal value of Chinese exporting producers, is a large and integrated company and, as such, is able to ‘optimise costs’.
Zadevne strani so se sklicevale na običajno prakso Unije v preteklih zadevah, v katerih se to ni počelo.
Thus, the company in question cannot be compared with the small Chinese factories.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je bila predhodna praksa EU spremenjena glede na odločitev STO, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 107.
In this regard, the Commission recalled that the manufacturing costs of the Chinese producers were not part of the analysis in this procedure as none of the Chinese producers had claimed MET status.
Za konstruiranje normalnih vrednosti za manjkajoče vrste izdelka se je Komisija oprla na tajvanske podatke o stroških ter prilagodila stroške, ki so bili ugotovljeni in preverjeni, tako da je uporabila sorazmerne prilagoditve, ki so bile ugotovljene na ravni stroškov proizvodnje industrije Unije.
Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the allegedly ‘optimised costs’ of the Taiwanese producer can only result in a lower constructed normal value and therefore in lower dumping margins for the Chinese exporting producers.
CCCMC ni utemeljila, zakaj to ni bilo razumno, in/ali predlagala alternativnega pristopa.
Taking into account that only a limited number of product types exported to the Union by the sampled Chinese exporting producers could be identified in Taiwan, the Commission has constructed the normal value of the remaining product types based on the costs of manufacturing of the most resembling product types produced in Taiwan in order to achieve a full and fair comparison, based on the costs of manufacturing adjusted for:
Po dodatnem razkritju so CCCMC in dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika znova ugovarjali uporabi podatkov industrije Unije za prilagoditev stroškov proizvodnje, uporabljenih pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti za manjkajoče vrste izdelka.
differences in raw material used — on the basis of verified Union Industry cost data, whereby fittings produced from seamless tubes are between 2,12 and 2,97 times more expensive to produce than those from welded tubes;
Poudarili so, da Komisija ni predložila dokazov, da so razlike v stroških surovin na trgu EU na enaki ravni kot na trgu Tajvana.
differences in grade of steel — on the basis of verified Union industry data, whereby a steel grade cost adjustment is made to the cost of the least expensive steel grades used for fittings produced based on welded tubes as raw material; this adjustment ranges from 1,49 to 3,60 times depending on the steel grades used;
Poleg tega so ponovili trditev, da bi lahko Komisija za zgornje prilagoditve uporabila razlike v kitajskih izvoznih cenah brezšivnega in varjenega pribora (fitingov), saj prodajne cene „deloma izražajo gibanje razlik v stroških proizvodnje“.
differences in shapes — on the basis of observed price differences in the sales transactions of the Chinese exporters, whereby an elbow is considered the most basic shape and the other shapes (tees, reducers, caps and specialty forms) are between 1,08 and 1,74 times more expensive.
V odgovoru na zgornje trditve je treba najprej poudariti, da Komisija ni mogla primerjati ravni prilagoditev za vrste cevi, uporabljene kot surovina, ali vrste jekla s podatki s tajvanskega trga, saj tajvanski proizvajalec, katerega stroški so bili uporabljeni kot podlaga za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti, nekaterih vrst surovin preprosto ni uporabljal.
The CCCMC proposed in its submission after provisional disclosure an alternative basis for adjustments of points (a) and (b) and presented data from the Chinese markets in this respect.
To je bil glavni razlog, zakaj je Komisija sploh razmišljala o tem, da bi manjkajoče podatke o stroških poiskala zunaj trga primerljive države.
However, this data are, firstly, unverified and, secondly, originate in a non-market economy country.
Drugič, v zvezi z uporabo kitajskih cen je treba ponoviti, da ni nobeden od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v tem postopku zahteval TGO.
Therefore, using them would negate the analogue country methodology for the calculation of the normal value.
Zato kitajski stroški proizvodnje niso bili na voljo niti niso bili preučeni.
This claim of the CCCMC was thus rejected.
Komisija zato ne more izpeljati sklepov glede tega, „v kakšnem obsegu“ razlike v prodajnih cenah izražajo razlike v stroških proizvodnje različnih vrst pribora (fitingov) [8].
Following the final disclosure, the CCCMC, as well as two Chinese exporting producers, claimed it was unreasonable to adjust the Taiwanese cost data by using the Union industry cost data.
Tudi če bi bilo take sklepe mogoče izpeljati, pa bi veljali za stroške proizvodnje v državi brez tržnega gospodarstva.
The parties in question referred to the Union common practice not to do that in past cases.
Zgornje trditve so zato zavrnjene.
As mentioned above, the EU's previous practice was revised in the light of the WTO ruling referred to in recital 107.
Navedene zainteresirane strani nadalje dvomijo o prilagoditvi, pri kateri je proizvodnja pribora (fitingov) iz brezšivnih ceni od 2,12- do 2,97-krat dražja kot proizvodnja iz varjenih cevi.
In order to construct the normal values of the missing product types, the Commission relied on Taiwanese cost data and adjusted the costs found and verified by applying proportional adjustments that were found at the level of the cost of production of the Union industry.
Sklicujejo se na neutemeljeno trditev CCCMC po začasnem razkritju glede ravni cen, v skladu s katero naj bi bila razlika med varjenimi in brezšivnimi cevmi manj kot 30 % cene varjenih cevi.
The CCCMC failed to substantiate why this was unreasonable and/or to propose an alternative approach.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da prilagoditev, ki jo je opravila Komisija, temelji na ugotovljeni razliki v stroških med priborom (fitingi), proizvedenim iz brezšivnih cevi, in priborom (fitingi), proizvedenim iz varjenih cevi, in ne na razliki v ceni med varjenimi in brezšivnimi cevmi kot takimi.
Following additional disclosure CCCMC and the two Chinese exporting producers reiterated their objection to the use of Union industry data for the adjustment of costs of manufacturing used in construction of the normal value for missing product types.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da nobeden od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni zahteval TGO.
The parties underlined that the Commission did not provide evidence showing that differences in raw material costs in the EU market would be at the same level of that in Taiwan's market.
Posledično kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki niso predložili podatkov o stroških proizvodnje, in sicer niti potem, ko so podvomili o določitvah stroškov in razlikah, ki jih je ugotovila Komisija.
Furthermore, the parties repeated their claim that the Commission could use differences in Chinese export sales prices of seamless and welded fitting for the above adjustment as sales prices ‘to some extent reflect the trend of differences in costs of production’.
Poleg tega so standardni ceniki še dlje od določitev stroškov in cen, saj ne dokazujejo dejansko uporabljenih cen, kaj šele ravni stroškov.
In response to the above claims it is first stressed that the Commission could not compare the level of adjustments for types of pipes used as raw materials or grades of steel to the data from Taiwanese market as the Taiwanese producer whose costs of manufacturing were used as a basis for construction of normal value simply did not use certain types of raw materials.
Zainteresirane strani so v podporo svojim stališčem predložile analizo razlik na podlagi ravni cen proizvajalcev Zhejiang Good in Zhejiang Jndia ter na tej podlagi ugotovile, da bi morala biti veljavna prilagoditev cene med 0,43 in 1,70 oziroma 0,64 in 1,80.
That was the basic reason why the Commission at all considered looking for the missing cost data outside the market of the analogue country.
Razen dejstva, da se ta razpona nanašata na cene in ne na stroške, dejstvo, da se pribor (fitingi) na podlagi varjenih cevi včasih prodaja po višji cenah kot pribor (fitingi) na podlagi brezšivnih cevi, ne dokazuje, da bi stroški morali biti višji.