natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union contains provisions laying down the powers of the Union relating, inter alia, to the freedom of movement of workers (Articles 45 to 48), the right of establishment (Articles 49 to 55), social policy (Articles 151 to 161), the promotion of dialogue between management and labour (Article 154), including agreements concluded and implemented at Union level (Article 155), equal pay for men and women for equal work (Article 157), the contribution to the development of quality education and vocational training (Articles 165 and 166), Union action complementing national policies and fostering cooperation in the field of health (Article 168), economic, social and territorial cohesion (Articles 174 to 178), the formulation, and the surveillance of the implementation, of the broad guidelines of the economic policies (Article 121), the formulation, and the examination of the implementation of the employment guidelines (Article 148) and more generally, the approximation of legislation (Articles 114 to 117).
Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije vsebuje določbe o pristojnostih Unije, ki se med drugim nanašajo na prosto gibanje delavcev (členi 45 do 48), pravico do ustanavljanja (členi 49 do 55), socialno politiko (členi 151 do 161), spodbujanje dialoga med socialnimi partnerji (člen 154), vključno s sporazumi, ki se sklenejo in izvajajo na ravni Unije (člen 155), enako plačilom za enako delo za moške in ženske (člen 157), spodbujanje razvoja kakovostnega izobraževanja in poklicnega usposabljanja (člena 165 in 166), dejavnost Unije, ki dopolnjuje nacionalne politike in spodbuja sodelovanje na področju zdravja (člen 168), ekonomsko, socialno in teritorialno kohezijo (členi 174 do 178), oblikovanje in nadzor nad izvajanjem širših smernic ekonomskih politik (člen 121), oblikovanje in preverjanje izvajanja smernic za zaposlovanje (člen 148) ter na splošno na približevanje zakonodaje (členi 114 do 117).
The European Parliament called for a solid European Pillar of Social Rights to reinforce social rights and deliver a positive impact on people's lives in the short and medium term and enable support for European construction in the 21st century [1].
Evropski parlament je pozval k vzpostavitvi trdnega evropskega stebra socialnih pravic, ki bo okrepil socialne pravice, kratkoročno in srednjeročno pozitivno vplival na življenje ljudi in podprl gradnjo Evrope v 21. stoletju [1].
The European Council stressed that economic and social insecurity needs to be addressed as a matter of priority and called for the creation of a promising future for all, safeguards for our way of life and the provision of better opportunities for youth [2].
Evropski svet je poudaril, da je treba gospodarsko in socialno negotovost obravnavati prednostno ter pozval k ustvarjanju obetavne prihodnosti za vse, zaščiti našega življenjskega sloga ter zagotavljanju boljših možnosti za mlade [2].
That commitment is based on the principles of sustainable growth and the promotion of economic and social progress, as well as cohesion and convergence, while upholding the integrity of the internal market [3].
Ta zaveza temelji na načelih trajnostne rasti, spodbujanju gospodarskega in družbenega napredka ter koheziji in zbliževanju, obenem pa se ohranja celovitost notranjega trga [3].
The social partners have committed to continue contributing to a Europe that delivers for its workers and enterprises [4].
Socialni partnerji so se zavezali, da bodo še naprej prispevali k Evropi, ki prinaša koristi za delavce in podjetja [4].
However, the social consequences of the crisis have been far-reaching — from youth and long-term unemployment to the risk of poverty — and addressing those consequences remains an urgent priority.
Vendar so socialne posledice krize daljnosežne, od brezposelnosti mladih in dolgotrajne brezposelnosti do tveganja revščine, zato obravnavanje teh posledic ostaja nujna prednostna naloga.
In particular, nothing in the European Pillar of Social Rights shall be interpreted as restricting or adversely affecting rights and principles as recognised, in their respective fields of application, by Union law or international law and by international agreements to which the Union or all the Member States are party, including the European Social Charter signed at Turin on 18 October 1961 and the relevant Conventions and Recommendations of the International Labour Organisation.
Zlasti se noben del evropskega stebra socialnih pravic ne sme razlagati tako, da bi lahko omejeval ali negativno vplival na pravice in načela, ki so na posameznih področjih uporabe priznana v pravu Unije ali mednarodnem pravu in v mednarodnih sporazumih, katerih pogodbenica je Unija ali vse države članice, vključno z Evropsko socialno listino, podpisano v Torinu 18. oktobra 1961, in zadevnimi konvencijami in priporočili Mednarodne organizacije dela.
Social partners at all levels have a crucial role to play in pursuing and implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights, in accordance with their autonomy and the right to collective action.
Socialni partnerji na vseh ravneh imajo ključno vlogo pri uresničevanju in izvajanju evropskega stebra socialnih pravic v skladu z njihovo avtonomnostjo in pravico do kolektivnega ukrepanja –
Equality of treatment and opportunities between women and men must be ensured and fostered in all areas, including regarding participation in the labour market, terms and conditions of employment and career progression.
Na vseh področjih, tudi v zvezi z udeležbo na trgu dela, pogoji za zaposlitev in poklicnim napredovanjem, je treba zagotoviti in spodbujati enako obravnavanje in enake možnosti žensk in moških.
Women and men have the right to equal pay for work of equal value.
Ženske in moški imajo pravico do enakega plačila za delo enake vrednosti.
Everyone has the right to timely and tailor-made assistance to improve employment or self-employment prospects.
Vsakdo ima pravico do hitre in prilagojene pomoči za izboljšanje možnosti za zaposlitev ali samozaposlitev.
Young people have the right to continued education, apprenticeship, traineeship or a job offer of good standing within 4 months of becoming unemployed or leaving education.
Mladi imajo pravico do nadaljnjega izobraževanja, vajeništva, pripravništva ali ponudbe za zaposlitev v štirih mesecih od dne, ko postanejo brezposelni ali prenehajo z izobraževanjem.
People unemployed have the right to personalised, continuous and consistent support.
Brezposelni imajo pravico do prilagojene, stalne in ustrezne podpore.
Fair working conditions
Pošteni delovni pogoji
Regardless of the type and duration of the employment relationship, workers have the right to fair and equal treatment regarding working conditions, access to social protection and training.
Ne glede na vrsto ali trajanje zaposlitvenega razmerja imajo delavci pravico do poštenega in enakega obravnavanja v zvezi z delovnimi razmerami, dostopom do socialne zaščite in usposabljanjem.
In accordance with legislation and collective agreements, the necessary flexibility for employers to adapt swiftly to changes in the economic context shall be ensured.
V skladu z zakonodajo in kolektivnimi sporazumi se delodajalcem zagotovi potrebna prožnost, da se lahko hitro prilagodijo na spremembe v gospodarskem okolju.
Innovative forms of work that ensure quality working conditions shall be fostered.
Spodbujajo se inovativne oblike dela, ki zagotavljajo kakovostne delovne razmere.
Employment relationships that lead to precarious working conditions shall be prevented, including by prohibiting abuse of atypical contracts.
Preprečujejo se zaposlitvena razmerja, ki vodijo do negotovih delovnih razmer, vključno s prepovedjo zlorab netipičnih pogodb o zaposlitvi.
Workers have the right to fair wages that provide for a decent standard of living.
Delavci imajo pravico do poštenih plač, ki zagotavljajo dostojen življenjski standard.
Adequate minimum wages shall be ensured, in a way that provide for the satisfaction of the needs of the worker and his/her family in the light of national economic and social conditions, whilst safeguarding access to employment and incentives to seek work.
Zagotovijo se primerne minimalne plače, ki omogočajo izpolnjevanje potreb delavcev in njihovih družin glede na nacionalne gospodarske in socialne razmere ter hkrati zagotavljajo dostop do zaposlitve in motivacijo za iskanje dela.
All wages shall be set in a transparent and predictable way according to national practices and respecting the autonomy of the social partners.
Plače se določijo na pregleden in predvidljiv način v skladu z nacionalnimi praksami in ob spoštovanju avtonomnosti socialnih partnerjev.
Workers have the right to be informed in writing at the start of employment about their rights and obligations resulting from the employment relationship, including on probation period.
Delavci imajo pravico, da so ob nastopu zaposlitve pisno obveščeni o svojih pravicah in dolžnostih, ki izhajajo iz zaposlitvenega razmerja, vključno o poskusni dobi.
Prior to any dismissal, workers have the right to be informed of the reasons and be granted a reasonable period of notice.
Pred odpustitvijo imajo delavci pravico, da so obveščeni o razlogih in da se jim določi razumno dolg odpovedni rok.
The social partners shall be consulted on the design and implementation of economic, employment and social policies according to national practices.
Potrebno je posvetovanje s socialnimi partnerji glede zasnove in izvajanja ekonomskih, zaposlitvenih in socialnih politik v skladu z nacionalnimi praksami.
Workers or their representatives have the right to be informed and consulted in good time on matters relevant to them, in particular on the transfer, restructuring and merger of undertakings and on collective redundancies.
Delavcem oziroma njihovim predstavnikom je treba omogočiti pravočasno obveščanje in posvetovanje o zadevah, ki jih zadevajo, zlasti v primeru prenosa, prestrukturiranja in združitve podjetij ter kolektivnega odpuščanja.
Support for increased capacity of social partners to promote social dialogue shall be encouraged.
Spodbuja se podpora za večjo zmogljivost socialnih partnerjev pri krepitvi socialnega dialoga.
Workers have the right to a high level of protection of their health and safety at work.
Delavci imajo pravico do visoke ravni varovanja zdravja in varnosti pri delu.
Workers have the right to a working environment adapted to their professional needs and which enables them to prolong their participation in the labour market.
Delavci imajo pravico do delovnega okolja, prilagojenega njihovim poklicnim potrebam, ki jim omogoča daljšo udeležbo na trgu dela.
Workers have the right to have their personal data protected in the employment context.
Delavci imajo pravico do varovanja njihovih osebnih podatkov v okviru zaposlitve.
Social protection and inclusion
Socialna zaščita in vključevanje
Children have the right to affordable early childhood education and care of good quality.
Otroci imajo pravico do cenovno dostopne in kakovostne predšolske vzgoje in varstva.
Children have the right to protection from poverty.
Otroci imajo pravico do varstva pred revščino.
Workers and the self-employed in retirement have the right to a pension commensurate to their contributions and ensuring an adequate income.
Upokojeni delavci in samozaposleni imajo pravico do pokojnine, ki ustreza njihovim prispevkom in zagotavlja primeren dohodek.
Everyone in old age has the right to resources that ensure living in dignity.
Vsi starejši imajo pravico do sredstev, ki jim zagotavljajo dostojno življenje.
Access to social housing or housing assistance of good quality shall be provided for those in need.
Dostop do socialnih stanovanj ali kakovostne pomoči pri pridobitvi stanovanj se zagotavlja vsem socialno ogroženim.
Vulnerable people have the right to appropriate assistance and protection against forced eviction.
Ranljive osebe imajo pravico do primerne pomoči in zaščite pred prisilno izselitvijo.
Adequate shelter and services shall be provided to the homeless in order to promote their social inclusion.
Brezdomcem se zagotovijo primerna zatočišča in storitve, da se spodbudi njihovo socialno vključevanje.
Done at Brussels, 26 April 2017.
V Bruslju, 26. aprila 2017
European Parliament resolution of 19 January 2017 on a European Pillar of Social Rights (2016/2095(INI)).
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. januarja 2017 o evropskem stebru socialnih pravic (2016/2095(INI)).
The Bratislava Declaration of 16 September 2016.
Izjava iz Bratislave z dne 16. septembra 2016.
The Rome Declaration of 25 March 2017.
Rimska izjava z dne 25. marca 2017.
Joint statement of the social partners of 24 March 2017.
Skupna izjava socialnih partnerjev z dne 24. marca 2017.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/820
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2017/820
on proportionate police checks and police cooperation in the Schengen area
o sorazmernih policijskih kontrolah in policijskem sodelovanju na schengenskem območju
In an area without controls at internal borders, it is necessary to have a common response to cross-border threats affecting the public policy or internal security of that area.
Na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah je potreben skupen odziv na čezmejne grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti na tem območju.
The proper functioning of such an area relies not only on the uniform application of the Union acquis, but also on the use of national competences with regard to the maintenance of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security in line with the objectives of Schengen acquis.
Pravilno delovanje takšnega območja ni odvisno le od enotne uporabe pravnega reda Unije, temveč tudi od uporabe nacionalnih pristojnosti v zvezi z vzdrževanjem javnega reda in miru ter varovanjem notranje varnosti v skladu s cilji schengenskega pravnega reda.
For the proper functioning of the Schengen area, it is important to consider not only how the Member States manage their external borders, but also how they exercise their police powers, across their entire territory as well as in the border areas.
Za pravilno delovanje schengenskega območja ni pomembno proučiti le, kako države članice upravljajo s svojimi zunanjimi mejami, temveč tudi kako izvajajo policijska pooblastila na svojem celotnem ozemlju in na obmejnih območjih.
In 2012, the Commission issued Guidelines for Member States concerning police measures in the internal border zones accompanying the First Bi-annual report on the functioning of the Schengen area [1].
Komisija je leta 2012 objavila smernice za države članice glede policijskih ukrepov na območjih notranjih mej, ki spremljajo prvo polletno poročilo o delovanju schengenskega območja [1].
Based on the experience of the last three years, those guidelines should be reviewed.
Na podlagi izkušenj iz zadnjih treh let bi bilo treba navedene smernice pregledati.
This Recommendation serves that purpose.
To priporočilo je namenjeno takemu pregledu.
This Recommendation builds upon the ‘lessons learnt’ over the last three years in addressing threats to public policy or internal security and good practice in exercising police powers and cross-border police cooperation, relevant case-law on the police checks, Schengen evaluations conducted so far in the field of police cooperation and new possibilities resulting from technological developments.
To priporočilo temelji na izkušnjah, pridobljenih v zadnjih treh letih pri obravnavanju groženj javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, ter dobrih praksah pri izvajanju policijskih pooblastil in čezmejnega policijskega sodelovanja, upoštevni sodni praksi o policijskih kontrolah, dosedanjih schengenskih ocenjevanjih na področju policijskega sodelovanja in novih priložnostih, ki jih ponuja tehnološki razvoj.
In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2], the absence of border controls at internal borders does not affect the exercise of police powers by competent authorities of the Member States under national law, insofar as the exercise of those powers does not have an effect equivalent to border checks.
V skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] neizvajanje mejnega nadzora na notranjih mejah ne vpliva na izvajanje policijskih pooblastil s strani pristojnih organov držav članic v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, če izvajanje teh pooblastil nima enakovrednega učinka kot ga imajo mejne kontrole.
The exercise of police powers should not, in particular, be considered equivalent to the exercise of border checks when the police measures do not have border control as an objective, are based on general police information or experience regarding possible threats to public security and aim, in particular, to combat cross-border crime, are devised and executed in a manner clearly distinct from systematic checks on persons at the external borders, and are carried out on the basis of spot-checks.
Izvajanje policijskih pooblastil še zlasti ne bi smelo veljati za enakovredno izvajanju mejnih kontrol, če se policijski ukrepi ne izvajajo z namenom nadzorovanja meje, če temeljijo na splošnih policijskih informacijah ali izkušnjah glede morebitnega ogrožanja javne varnosti ter so zlasti namenjeni boju proti čezmejnemu kriminalu, če so zasnovani in izvršeni na način, ki se jasno razlikuje od sistematičnih kontrol oseb na zunanjih mejah, in se izvajajo na podlagi kontrol na kraju samem.
In light of the judgement of the Court of Justice in the Adil case [3], this is neither a cumulative nor an exhaustive list of criteria, meaning that these criteria should not be considered as prescribing the only set of possible police measures in border areas [4].
Glede na sodbo Sodišča v zadevi Adil [3] to ni niti kumulativni niti izčrpni seznam meril, kar pomeni, da se za ta merila ne bi smelo šteti, da predpisujejo edini možen sklop policijskih ukrepov na obmejnih območjih [4].
The provisions of Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 and the wording of Article 72 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union confirm that the abolition of internal border controls has not affected the prerogatives of the Member States with regard to the maintenance of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security.
Določbe člena 23 Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 in besedilo člena 72 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) potrjujejo, da odprava nadzora na notranjih mejah ne vpliva na pristojnosti držav članic glede vzdrževanja javnega reda in miru ter zagotavljanja notranje varnosti.
Police powers applicable across the territory of a Member State are compatible with Union law.
Policijska pooblastila, ki se uporabljajo na celotnem ozemlju države članice, so skladna s pravom Unije.
Accordingly, Member States may carry out police checks also in the border areas, including internal border areas, in the context of the police powers that exist under national law applicable to the entire territory.
V skladu s tem lahko države članice policijske kontrole izvajajo tudi na obmejnih območjih, vključno z notranjimi obmejnimi območji, v okviru policijskih pooblastil, ki jim jih daje nacionalno pravo, ki se uporablja za celotno ozemlje.
In the current circumstances of threats related to public policy or internal security from terrorism and other serious cross-border crime and risks of secondary movements of persons who have irregularly crossed the external borders, the intensification of police checks in the entire territory of Member States, including in border areas and the carrying-out of police checks along the main transport routes such as motorways and railways, may be considered necessary and justified.
Glede na trenutne grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti zaradi terorizma in drugih hudih čezmejnih kaznivih dejanj ter tveganje sekundarnega gibanja oseb, ki so nezakonito prečkale zunanje meje, se povečanje policijskih kontrol na celotnem ozemlju držav članic, vključno z obmejnimi območji, in izvajanje policijskih kontrol na glavnih prometnih poteh, kot so na primer avtoceste in železnice, lahko obravnava kot potrebno in upravičeno.
The decision on such checks, their location and intensity remains fully in the hands of the Member States and should always be proportionate to the identified threats.
Odločitev o takšnih kontrolah, njihova lokacija in intenzivnost ostajajo v celoti v rokah držav članic, pri čemer morajo biti kontrole vedno sorazmerne ugotovljenim grožnjam.
Such checks may prove more efficient than internal border controls, notably as they are more flexible than static border controls at specific border crossing points and can be adapted more easily to evolving risks.
Take kontrole se lahko izkažejo za učinkovitejše od nadzora na notranjih mejah, zlasti ker so bolj prilagodljive kot statični nadzor meje na določenih mejnih prehodih in jih je mogoče lažje prilagoditi spreminjajočim se tveganjem.
Border areas may have specific risks as regards cross-border crime and may also be more exposed to certain offences committed throughout the entire territory such as burglaries, vehicle theft, drugs trafficking, unauthorised secondary movement of third-country nationals, migrant smuggling or trafficking in human beings.
Za obmejna območja veljajo posebna tveganja v zvezi s čezmejnimi kaznivimi dejanji, lahko pa so tudi bolj izpostavljena nekaterim kaznivim dejanjem, storjenim na celotnem ozemlju, kot so vlomi, kraja vozil, nedovoljen promet s prepovedanimi drogami, nedovoljeno sekundarno gibanje državljanov tretjih držav, tihotapljenje migrantov ali trgovina z ljudmi.
The risks of breaches of the rules on the legality of residence within the territory might be also higher in border areas.
Nevarnost kršitve pravil o zakonitosti prebivanja na ozemlju je prav tako lahko višja na obmejnih območjih.
Taking account of those risks, Member States may decide to carry out and intensify police checks in border areas, which are adapted to the specific risks of border areas, as long as those measures do not have an effect equivalent to border checks.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih tveganj se države članice lahko odločijo za izvajanje in okrepitev policijskih kontrol na obmejnih območjih, ki se prilagodijo posebnim tveganjem na obmejnih območjih, pod pogojem, da ti ukrepi nimajo enakovrednega učinka kot ga imajo mejne kontrole.
Modern technologies to monitor traffic flows, notably on motorways and other important roads determined by the Member States, can be instrumental in addressing threats to public policy or internal security.
Sodobne tehnologije za nadzor prometnih tokov, zlasti na avtocestah in drugih pomembnih cestah, ki jih določijo države članice, lahko prispevajo k obravnavanju groženj javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti.
From that perspective, the use of monitoring and surveillance systems allowing for automatic number plate recognition for law enforcement purposes should therefore be encouraged, subject to the applicable rules concerning camera surveillance, including data protection safeguards.
S tega vidika bi bilo zato treba spodbujati uporabo sistemov za nadzor in spremljanje, ki omogočajo samodejno prepoznavanje registrskih tablic za namene kazenskega pregona, ob upoštevanju veljavnih pravil o videonadzoru, vključno z zaščitnimi ukrepi za varstvo podatkov.
This could help the surveillance of the main European transport corridors, used by considerable numbers of travellers and vehicles to move across the Union, without a disproportionate impact to the traffic flow.
To bi lahko pripomoglo k nadzoru glavnih evropskih prometnih koridorjev, ki jih uporablja precejšnje število potnikov in vozil za gibanje po vsej Uniji, ne da bi nesorazmerno vplivalo na prometne tokove.
It is only in cases of police powers under national legislation which are specifically limited to border areas and imply identity checks even without concrete suspicion, that Member States have to provide for a specific framework to ensure that those police checks do not amount to measures equivalent to border controls.
Države članice morajo samo v primerih policijskih pooblastil, podeljenim z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki so posebej omejena na obmejna območja in vključujejo kontrole identitete tudi brez konkretnega suma, vzpostaviti poseben okvir, ki zagotavlja, da navedene policijske kontrole niso ukrepi, ki imajo enakovreden učinek kot mejne kontrole.