natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When considering their resettlement pledges Member States should therefore also take into account and support this UNHCR initiative.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJE PRIPOROČILO:
In a Joint Statement on Addressing the Challenge of Migration and Asylum of 28 August 2017 the representatives of France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the High Representative/Vice President of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, together with the representatives of Niger and Chad, and the Chairman of the Presidential Council of Libya recognised the need, as smuggler-driven migration is reduced, to organise the resettlement of people in need of international protection who are particularly vulnerable.
POVEČANJE ZAVEZ ZA PRESELITEV
At least 50000 resettlement places to be offered by the Union from the priority regions will contribute to global solidarity initiatives in scaling up legal pathways, including the UNHCR's recent global call for 40000 places for resettlement from the countries along the Central Mediterranean route in 2018.
Na podlagi izkušenj pri izvajanju trenutnih programov EU za preselitev in za olajšanje prehoda s teh programov na okvir Unije za preselitev bi morale države članice ponuditi vsaj 50000 mest za preselitev, da bi se do 31. oktobra 2019 sprejele osebe iz tretjih držav, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito.
The Commission should review the progress in the implementation of this Recommendation by 31 October 2018.
Države članice bi morale svoje zaveze osredotočiti na:
On the basis of this review and taking into account the overall migratory situation in the EU and globally Member States may be invited to further revise their pledges.
zagotavljanje rednih preselitev Sircev ter državljanov tretjih držav in oseb brez državljanstva, razseljenih zaradi konflikta v Siriji, iz Turčije, da se podpre izvajanje izjave EU in Turčije z dne 18. marca 2016, in sicer tudi prek prihodnjega prostovoljnega programa humanitarnega sprejema;
This recommendation should be addressed to the Member States.
zagotavljanje rednih preselitev iz Libanona in Jordanije;
The Associated States are invited to contribute to common European resettlement efforts,
prispevanje k stabilizaciji razmer v osrednjem Sredozemlju s preselitvijo oseb, ki potrebujejo zaščito, iz Libije, Nigra, Čada, Egipta, Etiopije in Sudana, vključno z zagotavljanjem podpore začasnemu mehanizmu UNHCR za nujno evakuacijo najranljivejših skupin migrantov iz Libije.
HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:
Države članice so pozvane, da svoje zaveze za preselitev izpolnijo čim prej, po potrebi v tesnem sodelovanju z UNHCR in s podporo urada EASO.
INCREASING RESETTLEMENT PLEDGES
SPREMLJANJE
Building on the experience achieved in the implementation of the current EU resettlement schemes and in order to bridge the transition between these schemes and the Union Resettlement Framework Member States should offer at least 50000 resettlement places to admit by 31 October 2019 persons in need of international protection from third countries.
Države članice bi morale Komisiji vsak mesec sporočiti število oseb, ki so bile za izpolnitev njihovih zavez preseljene na njihovo ozemlje, ter navesti državo, iz katere je bila posamezna oseba preseljena.
Member States who have not yet submitted their pledges under the resettlement pledging exercise launched by the Commission on 4 July 2017 should do so no later than by 31 October 2017 and those who have already done so should consider increasing their pledges in order to achieve the target.
FINANČNA PODPORA
Member States should focus their pledges:
Države članice bi morale za izpolnitev zavez za preselitev iz tega priporočila v celoti izkoristiti finančno podporo v višini 500 milijonov EUR, ki je na voljo v okviru Sklada za azil, migracije in vključevanje.
to ensure continued resettlement from Turkey of Syrians and third country nationals and stateless persons displaced by the conflict in Syria in order to support the implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016, including via the future Voluntary Humanitarian Admission Scheme (VHAS);
PREGLED
to ensure continued resettlement from Lebanon and Jordan;
NASLOVNIKI
to contribute to the stabilisation of the situation in the central Mediterranean by resettling persons in need of protection from Libya, Niger, Chad, Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan, including by supporting the UNHCR's temporary mechanism for emergency evacuation of the most vulnerable groups of migrants from Libya.
To priporočilo je naslovljeno na države članice.
Member States are invited to resettle in fulfilment of their pledges as soon as possible, in close cooperation with UNHCR and with support from EASO as appropriate.
V Bruslju, 3. oktobra 2017
MONITORING
Za Komisijo
Member States should communicate to the Commission on a monthly basis the number of persons resettled to their territory in fulfilment of their pledges, specifying the country from which the person has been resettled.
Član Komisije
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
Priporočilo Komisije z dne 8. junija 2015 o Evropskem programu za ponovno naselitev, C(2015) 3560 final.
REVIEW
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/1754 z dne 29. septembra 2016 o spremembi Sklepa (EU) 2015/1601 o uvedbi začasnih ukrepov na področju mednarodne zaščite v korist Italije in Grčije (UL L 268, 1.10.2016, str. 82).
The Commission will review this Recommendation by 31 October 2018.
Newyorška deklaracija za begunce in migrante, dostopna na: http://www.unhcr.org/new-york-declaration-for-refugees-and-migrants.html.
Following the Commission's review of the implementation of this Recommendation and taking into account the overall migratory situation in the EU and globally, Member States may be invited to further update their pledges as appropriate.
SEC(2017) 339.
ADDRESSEES
Samo v letu 2016 so države članice preselile 14205 beguncev, kar je znatno povečanje v primerjavi z 8155 osebami, preseljenimi v letu 2015, 6550 osebami, preseljenimi v letu 2014, ter med 4000 in 5000 osebami, preseljenimi na leto v obdobju 2010–2013.
This Recommendation is addressed to the Member States.
To povečanje kaže dodano vrednost in potencial sodelovanja in usklajevanja na ravni EU na področju preselitve.
Done at Brussels, 3 October 2017.
V podporo državam članicam pri izvajanju tega cilja bi bilo treba iz proračuna Unije dati na razpolago 500 milijonov EUR.
For the Commission
Države članice lahko v skladu s pogoji Sklada za azil, migracije in vključevanje za vsako osebo, preseljeno iz prednostnih regij, prejmejo pavšalni znesek v višini 10000 EUR.
Member of the Commission
Komisija bi morala do 31. oktobra 2018 pregledati napredek pri izvajanju tega priporočila.
Commission Recommendation of 8 June 2015 on a European resettlement scheme — C(2015) 3560 final.
Na podlagi tega pregleda in ob upoštevanju splošnega stanja migracij v EU in po svetu so države članice lahko pozvane, da spremenijo svoje zaveze.
Council Decision (EU) 2016/1754 of 29 September 2016 amending Decision (EU) 2015/1601 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece (OJ L 268, 1.10.2016, p.
Po tem, ko bo Komisija pregledala izvajanje tega priporočila, in ob upoštevanju splošnega stanja migracij v EU in po svetu so države članice lahko pozvane, da po potrebi posodobijo svoje zaveze.
82).
Preselitev je pomembno orodje za zagotavljanje zaščite prisilno razseljenim osebam in jasen izkaz globalne solidarnosti s tretjimi državami pri obvladovanju velikega števila oseb, ki bežijo pred vojnami ali preganjanjem.
New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants; available at: http://www.unhcr.org/new-york-declaration-for-refugees-and-migrants.html.
Dimitris Avramopulos
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/1804
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2017/1804
on the implementation of the provisions of the Schengen Borders Code on temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in the Schengen area
o izvajanju določb Zakonika o schengenskih mejah o začasni ponovni uvedbi nadzora na notranjih mejah na schengenskem območju
Given the impact that such reintroduction may have on all persons and goods having the right to move freely within the area without internal border control, it may only be a last resort measure subjected to strict conditions as to the scope and duration of any temporary reintroduction.
Zakonik predvideva ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah v primeru resne grožnje za javni red ali notranjo varnost tudi v primeru predvidenih dogodkov za obdobje največ šestih mesecev (člen 25).
The current provisions of the Schengen Borders Code provide for the possibility to rapidly reintroduce temporary internal border control where a serious threat to public policy or internal security requires immediate action in a Member State, for a period of maximum 2 months (Article 28).
Združeno izvajanje členov 28 in 25 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah omogoča ohranitev mejnega nadzora za skupno obdobje največ osmih mesecev.
The Code also provides for the reintroduction of border controls for serious threats to public policy or internal security in case of foreseeable events, for a period of maximum 6 months (Article 25).
Poleg tega nova grožnja za javni red ali notranjo varnost ponovno sproži uporabo pravil (in s tem nov izračun obdobja trajanja nadzora).
The combined implementation of Articles 28 and 25 of the Schengen Borders Code allows maintaining border control for a total period of up to eight months.
Člen 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah vsebuje izredni postopek, ki omogoča ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah za obdobje do dveh let, kadar je ogroženo splošno delovanje območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah zaradi trajnih resnih pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z nadzorom na zunanjih mejah, ki so bile ugotovljene v okviru schengenskega ocenjevanja.
Moreover, a new threat to public policy or internal security triggers a new application of the rules (and thus a new calculation of the duration of the period of controls).
Od sprejetja Uredbe (EU) 2016/1624 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1] se lahko ta postopek uporabi tudi v primeru, da država članica ne sprejme potrebnih ukrepov na podlagi ocene ranljivosti ali ne sodeluje z Agencijo, če razmere na zunanjih mejah zahtevajo nujno ukrepanje.
Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code contains an exceptional procedure allowing reintroduced internal border controls for a period going up to 2 years where the overall functioning of the area without internal border control is put at risk as a result of persistent serious deficiencies relating to external border control detected during a Schengen evaluation.
Čeprav so trenutno veljavna obdobja v veliki večini primerov zadostovala, se je v zadnjem času izkazalo, da lahko nekatere resne grožnje za javni red ali notranjo varnost, kot so teroristične grožnje ali večja nenadzorovana sekundarna gibanja znotraj Unije, trajajo tudi bistveno dlje od navedenih obdobij.
With the adoption of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council [1], this procedure can also be used in case a Member State does not take the necessary action further to a vulnerability assessment or does not cooperate with the Agency, where the situation at the external borders requires urgent action.
Komisija je sprejela predlog za spremembo zadevnih določb Zakonika o schengenskih mejah, da bi se v prihodnje take dolgotrajne grožnje lahko obravnavale.
While in the vast majority of cases the time limits currently in force have proved to be sufficient, recent times showed that certain serious threats to public policy or internal security, such as terrorist threats or important uncontrolled secondary movements within the Union, may persist well beyond the above periods.
S predlogom se bodo spremenila obdobja iz člena 25 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah v primeru predvidenih dogodkov, obenem pa predlog potrjuje, da je upravičeno podaljšati ponovno uvedeni nadzor na notranjih mejah za daljše obdobje od veljavnih, vendar za največ dve leti.
A proposal for an amendment to the relevant provisions of the Schengen Borders Code to address such persistent threats in the future has been adopted by the Commission.
Predlog poleg tega omogoča nadaljnje podaljšanje nadzora na notranjih mejah, če določena grožnja za notranjo varnost ali javni red obstaja tudi po navedenem obdobju.
The proposal modifies the time limits as set out in Article 25 of the Schengen Borders Code in case of foreseeable events and as such recognises that prolonging the reintroduced border controls at internal borders beyond the current time limits may be justified up to a maximum period of two years.
Ta nova obdobja spremljajo dodatne postopkovne zahteve za države članice, ki morajo biti izpolnjene pred ponovno uvedbo ali podaljšanjem nadzora na notranjih mejah.
Moreover, the proposal also provides for a possibility to further prolong border controls at internal borders where the specific threat to internal security or public policy persists even beyond that time limit.
Od držav članic se zlasti zahteva, da svoja uradna obvestila utemeljijo z oceno tveganja, ki dokazuje, da je načrtovana ponovna uvedba ali podaljšanje nadzora na notranjih mejah skrajni ukrep, in ki pojasnjuje, kako bi nadzor na notranjih mejah pomagal obravnavati ugotovljeno grožnjo.
These new deadlines are accompanied by additional procedural requirements for the Member States to be fulfilled prior to the reintroduction or prolongation of internal border controls.
Poleg tega mora Komisija zdaj izdati mnenje, kadar koli nadzor na notranjih mejah presega obdobje šestih mesecev.
In particular, Member States are required to support their notifications with a risk assessment demonstrating that the intended reintroduction or prolongation of internal border control is a last resort measure and explaining how internal border control would help addressing the identified threat.
Spremenjene so bile tudi določbe v zvezi s „postopkom posvetovanja“ po izdanem mnenju Komisije, ki odražajo novo vlogo evropske mejne in obalne straže in Europola ter zagotavljajo, da se rezultati takega posvetovanja, zlasti kar zadeva sodelovanje sosednjih držav članic, ustrezno upoštevajo.
Furthermore, the Commission is now required to issue an opinion whenever internal border control exceeds six months.
Vse te spremembe so namenjene zagotovitvi, da se ponovna uvedba nadzora na notranjih mejah uporabi le, kadar je to nujno in upravičeno, ter da ne presega nujnega in upravičenega obdobja.
The provisions concerning the ‘consultation procedure’ following the opinion of the Commission are also modified to reflect the new role for the European Border and Coast Guard and Europol and to ensure that the results of such consultation, in particular as regards the involvement of the neighbouring Member States, are duly taken into account.
Predlagane spremembe Zakonika o schengenskih mejah nadgrajujejo trenutno veljavne določbe.
All these changes are intended to ensure that reintroduction of internal border control is used only where and for as long as necessary and justified.
V obdobju do sprejetja sprememb Zakonika o schengenskih mejah, kot so opisane zgoraj, je bistvenega pomena, da vse države članice, ki nameravajo ponovno uvesti začasni nadzor na notranjih mejah, v polnem obsegu izvajajo zahteve veljavnih določb Zakonika o schengenskih mejah, ki že zdaj zahtevajo, da države članice, ki nameravajo uporabiti ta ukrep, najprej razmislijo o uvedbi drugih ukrepov, ki niso mejni nadzor, ter da sodelujejo s sosednjimi državami članicami.
The proposed changes to the Schengen Borders Code build on the current provisions.
V skladu s členom 26 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah bi morala zadevna država članica pred odločitvijo o uvedbi ali podaljšanju začasnega nadzora na notranjih mejah oceniti, v kolikšni meri se lahko s takim ukrepom ustrezno odpravi grožnja za javni red ali notranjo varnost, ter sorazmernost ukrepa glede na zadevno grožnjo, pri tem pa med drugim upoštevati verjetni učinek takega ukrepa na prosto gibanje oseb na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah.
While awaiting the adoption of the amendment of the Schengen Borders Code as detailed above, it is essential that all Member States intending to reintroduce temporary border control at internal borders implement to the full extent the requirements of the existing provisions in the Schengen Borders Code which already now require Member States intending to use this measure to consider first alternative measures to border controls and to cooperate with the neighbouring Member States.
Ciljno usmerjen nadzor, ki temelji na analizi tveganja in obveščevalnih podatkih, ki se nenehno posodabljajo, bi zato prispeval h kar največjim koristim nadzora in omejil njegov negativni učinek na prosto gibanje.
Pursuant to Article 26 of the Schengen Borders Code, prior to a decision to reintroduce or to prolong temporary border controls at internal borders, the Member State concerned should assess the extent to which such a measure is likely to adequately remedy the threat to public policy or internal security and the proportionality of the measure in relation to that threat, taking into account, among others, the likely impact of such a measure on free movement of persons within the area without internal border control.
Državam članicam, ki jih zadeva ponovna uvedba nadzora na zadevnih delih meje, bi moralo biti dovoljeno, da redno izražajo svoje mnenje o nujnosti nadzora, da bi se vzpostavilo vzajemno sodelovanje vseh vpletenih držav članic in da bi se redno pregledovala sorazmernost ukrepov z dogodki, ki so privedli do ponovne uvedbe mejnega nadzora, in z grožnjo za javni red ali notranjo varnost.
Targeted controls, based on constantly updated risk analysis and intelligence would therefore help optimising the benefit of the controls and limit their negative effects on free movement.
Država članica, ki se je odločila za ponovno uvedbo takega nadzora, bi morala ta mnenja upoštevati pri preučevanju in pregledovanju nujnosti takega nadzora s ciljem, da se nadzor nenehno prilagaja okoliščinam.
The Member States affected by the reintroduced controls at the relevant border sections should be admitted to regularly express their views on their necessity, with a view to organising mutual cooperation between all Member States involved and to examining, on a regular basis, the proportionality of the measures to the events giving rise to the reintroduction of border control and the threat to public policy or internal security.
V skladu s členom 27(1)(e) Zakonika o schengenskih mejah bi morala država članica, ki namerava ponovno uvesti ali podaljšati nadzor na notranjih mejah, med drugim zagotoviti informacije o ukrepih, ki naj bi jih sprejele druge države članice v okviru načrtovanega mejnega nadzora.
The Member State having decided to reintroduce such controls should take these views into account when examining and reviewing the necessity of such checks, with the objective of constantly adapting them to the circumstances.
Poleg tega lahko v skladu s členom 27(5) Zakonika o schengenskih mejah potekajo skupna srečanja med državo članico, ki načrtuje ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah, drugimi državami članicami, zlasti tistimi, ki jih taki ukrepi neposredno zadevajo, in Komisijo, da bi po potrebi organizirale vzajemno sodelovanje držav članic.
Under Article 27(1)(e) of the Schengen Borders Code, the Member State reintroducing or prolonging internal border controls should provide, among others, information on the measures to be taken by the other Member States in the context of the planned border controls.
Take stike s sosednjimi državami članicami bi bilo treba izkoristiti za omejitev učinka na prosto gibanje oseb.
Furthermore, under Article 27(5) of the Schengen Borders Code, joint meetings between the Member State planning to reintroduce border control at internal borders, the other Member States, especially those directly affected by the such measures, and the Commission may take place with a view to organising, where appropriate, mutual cooperation between the Member States.
Ker se začasna ponovna uvedba nadzora na notranjih mejah lahko uporabi le v izrednih okoliščinah in kot skrajni ukrep, bi morale države članice najprej preučiti, ali bi se lahko za učinkovito odpravo ugotovljene grožnje uporabili drugi ukrepi, ki niso mejni nadzor, ter se za uvedbo nadzora na zadevnih notranjih mejah odločiti le v skrajnem primeru, če taki manj omejevalni ukrepi v zvezi s čezmejnim prometom ne morejo zadovoljivo obravnavati ugotovljenih groženj.
Such contacts with the neighbouring Member States should be used to limit the impact on free movement.
V skladu s členom 27(1) Zakonika o schengenskih mejah bi morale zadevne države članice v svojih uradnih obvestilih navesti izid tega premisleka in razloge za odločitev za mejni nadzor.
As the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders may only be used in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort measure, the Member States should first examine whether other measures alternative to border control could not be used to effectively remedy the identified threat and decide to reintroduce border controls at the internal borders concerned only as a measure of last resort, when such less restrictive measures for cross-border traffic cannot sufficiently address the threats identified.
V zvezi s tem bi si morale države članice po svojih najboljših močeh prizadevati, da še naprej v celoti izvajajo Priporočilo Komisije z dne 12. maja 2017 (C(2017) 3349 final) o sorazmernih policijskih kontrolah in policijskem sodelovanju na schengenskem območju.
The Member States concerned should inform of the outcome of this reflection and the reasons for opting for border controls in their notification pursuant to Article 27(1) of the Schengen Borders Code.
To priporočilo bi bilo treba izvajati ob doslednem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic.
In this respect, the Member States should make all necessary efforts to further and fully implement the Recommendation of the Commission of 12 May 2017 (C(2017) 3349 final) on proportionate police checks and police cooperation in the Schengen area.
To priporočilo bi bilo treba nasloviti na vse schengenske države, ki jih zavezuje naslov III Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] –
This Recommendation should be implemented in full respect of fundamental rights.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJE PRIPOROČILO:
This Recommendation should be addressed to all Schengen States bound by Title III of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2],
OMEJITEV UČINKA NA PROSTO GIBANJE
HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:
Da bi se zagotovilo ustrezno ravnovesje med potrebo po zaščiti javnega reda ali notranje varnosti držav članic in koristmi območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah, bi morale države članice, ki nameravajo začasno ponovno uvesti nadzor na notranjih mejah, skrbno upoštevati in redno ocenjevati naslednje vidike, kadar v skladu s členom 26 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah ocenjujejo nujnost in sorazmernost vsake začasne ponovne uvedbe nadzora na notranjih mejah na podlagi členov 25 in 28 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah:
LIMITING THE IMPACT ON FREE MOVEMENT
verjetni učinek ponovne uvedbe nadzora na prosto gibanje oseb na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah;
In order to strike the right balance between the need to protect public policy or internal security in Member States and the benefits of the area without controls at internal borders, the Member States intending to reintroduce temporary internal border control should carefully take into account and regularly evaluate the following aspects when assessing pursuant to Article 26 of the Schengen Borders Code the need and proportionality of any temporary reintroduction of controls at internal borders pursuant to Articles 25 and 28 of the Schengen Borders Code:
verjetni učinek ponovne uvedbe nadzora na notranji trg.
the likely impact of such reintroduction on the free movement of persons within the area without internal border control;
V ta namen bi morale države članice, ki nameravajo začasno ponovno uvesti nadzor na notranjih mejah, v uradnem obvestilu iz člena 27(1) Zakonika o schengenskih mejah navesti rezultate svoje ocene o učinku načrtovane ponovne uvedbe ali podaljšanja nadzora na notranjih mejah na prosto gibanje in notranji trg.