natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As far as prices and profitability on the Union market are concerned, these are only relevant if prices are sold between unrelated parties.
Glede stroškov proizvodnje pa je treba opomniti, da je bilo gibanje tega kazalnika na prostem trgu analizirano kljub dejstvu, da osnovna uredba tega izrecno ne zahteva.
Indeed, there are no sales prices for captive transfers and no reliable sales prices for captive sales for the reasons already mentioned in recital 142 of the provisional Regulation.
Sprememba stroškov proizvodnje na zaprtem trgu ni bila analizirana iz razlogov, navedenih v isti uvodni izjavi.
Hence no meaningful analysis of the profitability on the captive market could be performed.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je torej jasno, da sklep o škodi temelji na trojni oceni (zaprti in prosti trgi ter kumulativna analiza), z uporabo vseh upoštevnih podatkov.
In respect of cost of production, it is recalled that the evolution of this indicator on the free market was analysed even though the basic Regulation does not specifically require it.
Trditev, da je bilo kršeno načelo poštene in objektivne obravnave, se zavrne.
The evolution of the cost of production on the captive market was not analysed for the reasons mentioned in the same recital.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega, in ker ni bilo drugih pripomb k zadevi, se potrdi metodologija presoje stanja industrije Unije iz uvodnih izjav od 120 do 123 začasne uredbe.
On the basis of the above, it has been clearly demonstrated that the conclusion on injury has been made by a three way assessment (captive and free markets and on a cumulative analysis) using all relevant data.
Makroekonomski kazalniki
The claim that a breach of the principle of fair and objective examination has taken place is rejected.
Proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti
On the basis of the above and in the absence of any other comments on the issue, the methodology to assess the situation of the Union industry as described in recitals 120 to 123 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ena zainteresirana stran je navedla, da se je industrija Unije preusmerila s prostega na zaprti trg in da jo bolj zanima prodaja na zaprtem trgu, kjer se prodajajo izdelki z višjo dodano vrednostjo.
Macroeconomic indicators
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da se industrija Unije ne odloča samostojno, ali se bo osredotočila na zaprti ali prosti trg.
Production, production capacity and capacity utilisation
Nasprotno, ker trg hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz jekla vodi povpraševanje, ne ponudba, kot dokazuje razpoložljiva zmogljivost proizvajalcev Unije, se industrija Unije ni odločila, da se bo osredotočila na zaprti trg, ampak je tržni delež in obseg prodaje na prostem trgu izgubila zaradi velike in izredno povečane dostopnosti dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
One interested party indicated that there was a shift of focus by the Union industry from the free to the captive market and that the Union industry has become more interested to sell on the captive market where higher added value products are sold.
Na zaprtem trgu takih težav ni bilo.
In this regard, it is noted that the Union industry does not independently decide to focus on the captive or the free market.
Zato je treba ta argument zavrniti.
On the contrary, the cold-rolled flat steel products' market being driven by demand and not by supply as evidenced by the available capacity of the Union producers, the Union industry did not decide to focus on the captive market but it lost market share and sales volumes on the free market due to the ample and strongly increased availability of dumped imports from the countries concerned.
Ista zainteresirana stran je trdila, da boljša izkoriščenost zmogljivosti ni povezana z zmanjšanjem zmogljivosti, temveč s povečanim obsegom proizvodnje.
There was no such issue on the captive market.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da čeprav boljša izkoriščenost zmogljivosti ni povezana zgolj z zmanjšanjem zmogljivosti, saj se je povečal tudi obseg proizvodnje, pa je zmanjšanje zmogljivosti daleč najpomembnejši razlog za boljšo izkoriščenost zmogljivosti.
The argument has therefore to be rejected.
Absolutne številke dejansko kažejo, da se je obseg proizvodnje povečal le za 337348 ton, medtem ko se je zmogljivost zmanjšala za 1873141 ton.
The same interested party claimed that the improvement of the capacity utilisation is not linked to a decrease in capacity but rather to the increase in production volume.
Na podlagi navedenega je bilo treba trditev zavrniti.
In this regard it is noted that, although the increase in capacity utilisation is not linked solely to the decrease in capacity as the production volume also increased, the capacity decrease is by far the main cause for the increase in capacity utilisation.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 124 do 126 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Indeed, when looking at absolute figures, the production volume increased by only 337348 tonnes while capacity decreased by 1873141 tonnes.
Obseg prodaje in tržni delež
On the basis of the above, the claim had to be rejected.
Ruski proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da zmanjšanja obsega prodaje ni mogoče šteti za dokaz škode, saj se okvirno sklada z zmanjšanjem potrošnje v obravnavanem obdobju.
In the absence of other comments, the conclusions set out in recitals 124 to 126 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Trdili so, da je zmanjšanje povezano s padcem svetovnih cen surovin, kar je povzročilo znižanje cen zadevnega izdelka, večji obseg uvoza iz tretjih držav od leta 2012 in uvoz zadevnega izdelka s strani industrije Unije.
Sales volume and market share
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej opozoriti, da razlike med zmanjšanjem prodaje (– 14 %) in potrošnje (– 9 %) ni mogoče odpraviti kot nepomembne.
Russian exporting producers submitted that the decrease in sales volume cannot be considered evidence of injury as it was broadly in line with the decline in consumption over the period considered.
Nadalje, znižanja svetovnih cen surovin ni mogoče šteti za veljaven razlog za zmanjšanje obsega prodaje, saj ta elementa, tj. cene surovin in obseg prodaje, nista neposredno povezana.
They argued that the decrease was linked to the fall in global raw material prices leading to lower prices of the product concerned, the growing volume of imports from third countries from 2012 and the Union industry's imports of the product concerned.
Poleg tega bi vsako znižanje svetovnih cen surovin veljalo za industrijo EU in uvoz.
In this regard it is first noted that the difference between the decrease in sales (– 4 %) and consumption (– 9 %) cannot regarded as insignificant.
Kar zadeva uvoz iz tretjih držav, pa je treba gibanje analizirati v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju, ne pa začeti na sredini takega obdobja.
Further, the decrease in global raw material prices cannot be seen as a valid reason for the decrease in sales volume as these elements, i.e. raw material prices and sales volumes, are not directly linked.
Glede na to je treba ugotoviti, da se je uvoz iz tretjih držav zmanjšal v absolutnem (– 206571 ton) in relativnem smislu (z 10,9-odstotnega na 9,1-odstotni tržni delež).
Further, any decrease in global raw material prices would apply both to the Union industry and to imports.
Nadalje, glede uvoza s strani industrije Unije iz zadevnih držav je treba opozoriti, da so bili takšni nakupi v obravnavanem obdobju stabilni in so predstavljali manj kot 1 % skupnega prihodka od prodaje industrije Unije.
As far as imports from third countries are concerned, the trend has to be analysed over the period considered and not starting in the middle of such period.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo treba to trditev zavrniti.
In this context, it is noted that imports from third countries have decreased both in absolute (– 206571 tonnes) and relative terms (from 10,9 % to 9,1 % market share).
Kar zadeva tržni delež, so iste strani dvomile o tem, kako je Komisija začasno sklenila, da zmanjšanje tržnega deleža industrije Unije (s 74,8 % na 70,8 %) kaže na škodo, medtem ko 5,4-odstotni tržni delež uvoza iz Indije, Irana in Ukrajine ni mogel prekiniti vzročne zveze med domnevno škodo in uvozom iz zadevnih držav.
Furthermore, as far as Union industry imports from the countries concerned are concerned, it is noted that such purchases were stable in the period considered and represented less than 1 % of the total sales turnover of the Union industry.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da bi bilo treba tržni delež zgoraj omenjenih držav analizirati za celotno obravnavano obdobje, ne pa se osredotočiti zgolj na določeno enoletno obdobje.
On the basis of the above, this claim had to be rejected.
Iz tega sledi, da se je tržni delež uvoza iz Indije, Irana in Ukrajine v obravnavanem obdobju povečal s 4 % na le 5,4 %, tj. le za 1,4 odstotne točke, medtem ko se je skupni uvoz iz tretjih držav, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 105 zgoraj, zmanjšal z 10,9 % na 9,1 % v korist uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
With regard to market share, the same parties questioned how the Commission had provisionally concluded that the decrease in Union industry market share (from 74,8 % to 70,8 %) was indicative of injury while the 5,4 % market share held by imports from India, Iran and Ukraine was incapable of breaking the causal link between alleged injury and imports from the countries concerned.
Iz zgoraj navedenega sledi, da zmanjšanja tržnega deleža industrije Unije v ožjem pomenu ni mogoče primerjati s tržnim deležem zgoraj omenjenih držav in da je za to zmanjšanje mogoče šteti, da kaže na škodo.
In this regard it is worth noting that the market share of the countries mentioned above should be analysed over the period considered and not by focusing on a specific one-year period.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 127 do 132 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
It follows that the market share held by imports from India, Iran and Ukraine increased from 4 % to only 5,4 % over the period considered; i.e. by only 1,4 % percentage points while as mentioned in recital 105 above, total imports from third countries decreased from 10,9 % to 9,1 % to the benefit of imports from the countries concerned.
Zaposlenost, stroški dela in produktivnost
It follows from the above that the decrease in market share for the Union industry cannot be compared stricto sensu with the market share held by the countries mentioned above and that this decrease can be regarded as indicative of injury.
Ena zainteresirana stran je navedla, da se zmanjšanje zaposlenosti ne bi smelo povezati z dampinškim uvozom iz zadevnih držav, temveč z modernizacijo opreme, ki je vodila v zaposlovanje bolj usposobljenega osebja in povzročila višje stroške dela.
In the absence of other comments, the conclusions set out in recitals 127 to 132 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da ni dokazov, ki bi podpirali trditve o modernizaciji opreme in zaposlovanju bolj usposobljenega osebja, zato bi bilo treba te trditve zavrniti.
Employment, labour cost and productivity
Druga zainteresirana stran je podvomila o nasprotujočih si gibanjih zaposlovanja (– 10 %) in stroškov dela (+ 11 %) v obravnavanem obdobju.
One interested party indicated that the employment decrease should not be linked to dumped imports from the countries concerned but rather to the equipment modernisation which led to the hiring of more skilled staff and resulted in higher labour costs.
Vprašala je tudi, ali se sprememba nanaša na zaprti in prosti trg.
In this regard, it is noted that the allegations made with regard to equipment modernisation and hiring of more skilled staff are not supported by any evidence and should therefore be rejected.
S tem v zvezi je naveden sklic na uvodno izjavo 144 začasne uredbe, ki določa, da je bilo povišanje stroškov dela dejansko povezano z velikimi rezi v zaposlovanju, kar je vodilo v izplačilo odpravnin in je posledično napihnilo stroške dela na EPDČ.
Another interested party raised doubts concerning the opposite trend followed by employment (– 10 %) and labour cost (+ 11 %) over the period considered.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da se zmanjšanje zaposlenosti ne nanaša zgolj na osebje na zaprtem ali prostem trgu, temveč na skupno zaposlenost, saj izdelke, namenjene na zaprti ali prosti trg, izdeluje isto osebje na isti opremi.
It also wondered whether the evolution applied to both captive and free market.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 133 in 134 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In this regard, reference is made to recital 144 of the provisional Regulation, which provides that the increase in labour cost was indeed linked to severe cuts in employment which led to the payment of severance payments and consequently inflated the labour cost per FTE.
Zaloge, velikost stopnje dampinga, rast, cene, dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe in donosnost naložb
It is also noted that the reduction in employment did not relate exclusively to the free or captive market staff but rather affected the overall employment as products destined to free or captive market are produced by the same staff on the same equipment.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z zalogami, velikostjo stopnje dampinga, rastjo, cenami, dobičkonosnostjo, denarnim tokom, naložbami in donosnostjo naložb, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 135 do 151 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of other comments, the conclusions set out in recitals 133 and 134 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Sklep o škodi
Inventories, magnitude of the dumping margin, growth, prices, profitability, cash flow, investments and return on investments
Več zainteresiranih strani je navedlo, da je analiza škode temeljila le na negativnem razvoju kazalnikov na prostem trgu in da zaključki takšne analize ne zadostujejo za utemeljitev, da je industrija Unije kot celota utrpela znatno škodo.
In the absence of comments regarding inventories, magnitude of the dumping margin, growth, prices, profitability, cash flow, investments and return on investments, the conclusions set out in recitals 135 to 151 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
V zvezi s tem, in kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 96, je treba spomniti, da Komisija analize ni omejila le na prosti trg, temveč je, kjer je bilo ustrezno, analizirala in izvedla zaključke o razvoju gospodarskega položaja industrije Unije kot celote ter zlasti na zaprtem trgu.
Conclusion on injury
Nadalje bi bilo treba opozoriti, da sklep, da je industrija utrpela znatno škodo, ne temelji zgolj na negativnem razvoju mikro- in makrokazalnikov na prostem trgu.
Several interested parties indicated that the injury analysis was based only on the negative development of the indicators on the free market and that the conclusions of such analysis were insufficient to justify that the Union industry, as a whole, suffered material injury.
Čeprav nekateri mikro- in makrokazalniki res kažejo negativni razvoj na prostem trgu, pa tudi drugi kazalniki, ki se nanašajo na splošno uspešnost industrije Unije, kot so zaposlenost, stroški dela na EPDČ, naložbe in donosnost naložb, dokazujejo poslabšanje položaja industrije Unije.
In this regard, and as indicated in recital 96, it is recalled that the Commission did not limit its analysis to the free market in particular but also, where applicable, analysed and concluded on the evolution of the economic situation of Union industry as a whole and in the captive market in particular.
Glede na obseg prostega in zaprtega trga je treba opozoriti, da pozitivni razvoj uspešnosti industrije Unije na zaprtem trgu (glede na nekatere kazalnike) ni zadostoval, da bi pretehtal negativni uspeh na prostem trgu, kar dokazuje negativni razvoj zgoraj navedenih kazalnikov, ki se nanašajo na dejavnost na splošno.
Further, it should be noted that the conclusion that the industry suffered material injury is not solely based on the negative development of micro- and macro-indicators in the free market.
Na podlagi navedenega je treba trditev zavrniti.
While certain micro- and macro-indicators indeed show a negative development in the free market, other indicators relating to the overall performance of the Union industry such as employment, labour cost per FTE, investments and return on investment, also evidence a deterioration of the situation of the Union industry.
Na podlagi analize pripomb, povzetih v uvodnih izjavah od 73 do 115 zgoraj, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 152 do 155 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Considering the respective size of both free and captive markets, it is noted that the positive development of the performance of the Union industry on the captive market (in respect of certain indicators) was not sufficient to outweigh the negative performance on the free market as evidenced by the negative development of the abovementioned indicators relating to the overall activity.
VZROČNA ZVEZA
In the light of the above, the claim has to be rejected.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da škode ni mogoče pripisati dampinškemu uvozu iz zadevnih držav in da drugi dejavniki prekinjajo vzročno zvezo.
On the basis of the analysis of the comments, as summarised in recitals 73 to 115 above, the conclusions set out in recitals 152 to 155 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Nekatere trditve so bile zgolj ponovitev trditev, predloženih v začasni fazi, brez novih elementov.
CAUSATION
Nove pripombe so analizirane spodaj.
Several interested parties claimed that the injury could not be attributed to the imports of dumped imports from the countries concerned and that other factors were breaking the causal link.
Okrevanje evropskega gospodarstva
Some of the claims were a mere reiteration of the claims already brought forward at the provisional stage, without any new elements.
Ena zainteresirana stran je nasprotovala obstoju počasnega okrevanja po krizi leta 2012 in trdila, da uvoz iz zadevnih držav ni oviral industrije Unije pri izkoriščanju takega okrevanja.
The new comments are analysed below.
V bistvu je trdila, da evropsko gospodarstvo ni okrevalo po krizi iz leta 2012 zaradi domnevnega nadaljnjega majhnega povpraševanja po hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkih iz jekla.
Recovery of the European economy
Najprej bi bilo treba opozoriti, da se je potrošnja med letom 2012 in obdobjem preiskave povečala za 4,4 %, kar je mogoče šteti za znak počasnega okrevanja, čeprav ni dosegla ravni iz leta 2011.
One interested party contested the existence of a slow recovery process following the 2012 crisis and claimed that imports from the countries concerned had not hindered the Union industry to benefit from such recovery.
Kar zadeva uvoz iz zadevnih držav, pa je treba opozoriti, da se je njun tržni delež ob počasnem okrevanju s 13,5 % leta 2012 povečal na 18,7 % leta 2013 in celo na 20,1 % v obdobju preiskave.
In substance, they claimed that the failure to recover from the 2012 crisis was caused by the alleged continuing low demand for cold-rolled flat steel products.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je treba to trditev zavrniti.
It should first be noted that consumption between 2012 and the investigation period increased by 4,4 %, which, despite the fact that it did not reach its 2011 level, can be regarded as a sign of slow recovery.
Naložbe, zmogljivost in povečanje proizvodnje
As far as imports from the countries concerned are concerned, it is worth noting that in a context of slow recovery, their market share increased from 13,5 % in 2012 to 18,7 % in 2013 and even 20,1 % in the investigation period.
Ista zainteresirana stran je trdila, da je industrija Unije z dragimi naložbami v letih 2011 in 2012 ter s povečanjem zmogljivosti leta 2011 nehote sprejela napačne poslovne odločitve.
On the basis of the above, the claim has to be rejected.
V zvezi s tem je treba spomniti, da je bila analiza v tej preiskavi osredotočena na spreminjanje gospodarskega položaja industrije Unije v obdobju med letom 2011 in obdobjem preiskave.
Investments, capacity and production increase
Zato povečanja zmogljivosti med letoma 2010 in 2011 ni mogoče šteti za del obsega te analize.
The same interested party claimed that the Union industry had inadvertently made wrong business decisions by making expensive investments in 2011 and 2012 and by increasing capacity in 2011.
Nadalje je treba opozoriti, da ni dejanskih dokazov, ki bi podpirali trditev, da naj bi industrija Unije v letih 2011 in 2012 izvedla domnevno drage naložbe.
On this point, it is reminded that this investigation focused its analysis on the evolution of the economic situation of the Union industry in the period 2011-investigation period.
Nazadnje, opozoriti je treba, da so naložbe vzorčene industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju predstavljale manj kot 2,5 % njenih neto sredstev, sestavljale pa so jih večinoma nadomestne naložbe in naložbe v racionalizacijo.
Therefore, the capacity increase that took place between 2010 and 2011 cannot be regarded as being part of the scope of the analysis.
Glede na raven naložb in njihovo naravo jih ni mogoče šteti za dovolj pomembne, da bi lahko vplivale na gospodarsko uspešnost industrije Unije.
Further, it is noted that the claim that the Union industry made allegedly expensive investments in 2011 and 2012 is not supported by any factual evidence.
Zato je treba trditev zavrniti.
Eventually, it is noted that the investments performed by the sampled Union industry during the period considered represented less than 2,5 % of their net assets and consisted mainly in replacement and rationalisation investments.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov in znova po končnem razkritju so nekatere zainteresirane strani trdile, da bi bilo treba za vzrok škode šteti povečanje obsega proizvodnje industrije Unije v času, ko se je potrošnja zmanjševala, ne pa uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
Given the level of the investments and their nature, such investments cannot be considered as sufficiently significant to have a bearing on the economic performance of the Union industry.
Glede tega in, kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 152 začasne uredbe, je treba opomniti, da je industrija Unije povečala obseg proizvodnje, da bi zadostila povečanju potrošnje za lastno uporabo.
The claim therefore has to be rejected.
Glede na to, da industrija Unije večinoma proizvaja po naročilu, kar potrjujejo tudi razmeroma majhne zaloge (glej uvodno izjavo 136 začasne uredbe), takega povečanja ni mogoče šteti za vzrok za škodo.
After the imposition of provisional measures and again after final disclosure, certain interested parties argued that, rather than imports from the countries concerned, the increase in the Union industry's production volume, at a time when consumption was falling, should be considered as the cause of injury.
Cene surovin
In this regard and as indicated in recital 152 of the provisional Regulation it is recalled that the Union industry increased its production volume in order to satisfy the increase in captive consumption.
Več zainteresiranih strani je nasprotovalo sklepom o vplivu zniževanja cen surovin na cene, ki jih je zaračunavala industrija Unije.
As the Union industry mostly produces to order as confirmed by the relatively low stock levels (see recital 136 of the provisional Regulation), such increase cannot be considered as cause of injury.
Prvič, nasprotovale so trditvi, da so se uvozne cene znižale manj kot cene surovin, in za primer vzele železovo rudo.
Raw material prices
Ta stran je v predloženih informacijah navedla, da se je cena železove rude (RMB/tono) v obravnavanem obdobju znižala za 39 %.
Several interested parties disputed the conclusions reached with regard to the impact of the decreasing raw material prices on the prices charged by the Union industry.
Drugič, trdile so, da argumentacija Komisije v uvodnih izjavah od 171 do 175 začasne uredbe ni ovrgla trditve, da je znižanje cen surovin povzročilo znižanje cen izdelka v preiskavi, in da Komisija ni zadosti upoštevala znižanja svetovnih cen surovin.
First they contested that the decrease in import prices was lower than the decrease in raw material prices and took the example of iron ore.
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej spomniti, da so se uvozne cene iz zadevnih držav v obravnavanem obdobju v povprečju znižale za 20 %, kar presega znižanje stroškov proizvodnje industrije Unije.