natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The rights of the interested party in question have thus been fully respected.
Trdila je, da zato za njeno prodajo prek povezanih predelovalcev izvoznih cen ne bi bilo treba konstruirati z uporabo prodajnih cen majhnih zavitkov nepovezanim strankam.
Hansol Group's claims are therefore rejected.
Komisija je to trditev zavrnila, saj ni bila podprta s podatki v spisu.
The Hansol Group also claimed that the prices charged to its related converters were at arm's length.
Prvič, najbolj prodajana vrsta izdelka (ki zajema več kot 30 % skupne prodaje skupine Hansol v Uniji) se je povezanim stranem prodajala po prodajnih cenah, ki so bile za 8–15 % višje od povprečne prodajne cene nepovezanim strankam.
It argued that therefore, for its sales through related converters, there was no need to construct the export prices using the sale prices of the small rolls to unrelated customers.
Drugič, glede na vse vrste izdelka skupaj so povezane družbe plačale ceno, ki je bila za 3–6 % višja od cene, zaračunane nepovezanim strankam.
The Commission rejected this claim because the data on the file did not support it.
Na podlagi podatkov v spisu se torej ni potrdila trditev, da so bile prodajne cene skupine Hansol za povezane predelovalce primerljive tržne cene.
First, the mostly sold product type (representing more than 30 % of Hansol Group's total Union sales) was sold to related parties at a sales price that was between 8 % - 15 % higher than the average sales price to unrelated customers.
Poleg tega je Komisija ugotovila še, da sta dve preverjeni povezani strani v Uniji ustvarjali velike izgube v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom.
Second, taking all product types together, the related companies paid a price that was between 3 % and 6 % higher than the price charged to unrelated customers.
To potrjuje zgornjo ugotovitev, da nakupna cena, ki so jo plačale povezane družbe skupine Hansol v Uniji, ob upoštevanju stroškov, ki so jih imele kot stroške predelave in/ali prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške, odvisno od povezane družbe, ni tržna cena za velike zvitke.
Therefore, the claim that the Hansol Group's sales prices to related converters were at arm's length was not confirmed by the data on the file.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija menila, da je bila torej upravičena do konstruiranja izvoznih cen za prodajo skupine prek povezanih strani.
In addition, the Commission also found that the two verified related parties in the Union were both heavily loss-making as regards the product concerned.
Skupina Hansol je tudi trdila, da naj bi nekateri premisleki v zvezi s končanjem protidampinških in protisubvencijskih postopkov glede lososa [5] in protidampinškega postopka glede nekaterih brezšivnih cevi [6] kazali domnevno prakso Komisije, da v podobnih okoliščinah kot so prisotne v sedanjem postopku uporablja cene, ki jih plačajo povezane strani.
This corroborates the above finding that the purchase price paid by Hansol Group's related companies in the Union is not a market price for the jumbo rolls, considering the costs they have to incur either as conversion costs and/or SG&A costs, depending on the related company.
Komisija v zvezi s tekočim postopkom poudarja, da je bilo, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 36 zgoraj, ugotovljeno, da cene v okviru povezane prodaje niso bile primerljive tržne cene, ampak izkrivljajoče transferne cene, zaradi česar je bilo ugotovljeno, da niso zanesljive za določitev izvozne cene.
On this basis, the Commission considered that it was therefore entitled to construct the export prices for its sales through related parties.
Te okoliščine se razlikujejo od postopkov, ki ju navaja skupina Hansol, saj je bilo v navedenih primerih ugotovljeno, da se je prodaja povezanim stranem izvajala po cenah, ki so bile v celoti skladne s cenami, zaračunanimi neodvisnim strankam.
The Hansol Group also claimed that certain considerations in the termination of the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings as regards Salmon [5] and in the anti-dumping proceeding on Certain seamless pipes and tubes [6] would suggest that there is a Commission practice to use the prices paid by related parties in circumstances like the ones in the present proceeding.
Poleg tega je Komisija v navedenih postopkih ugotovila še, da so povezane strani poslovale s primernimi dobički, kar ne velja za ta postopek (glej uvodno izjavo 36).
In respect of the proceeding at hand, the Commission points out that, as explained in recital (36) above, it was found that the related sales were not made at arm's length prices but at distorted transfer prices and, therefore, they were found to be unreliable for the determination of the export price.
Ta pripomba je bila zato zavrnjena.
These circumstances are different from the proceedings mentioned by the Hansol Group, as in those cases it was found that the sales to the related parties were made at prices which were fully in line with the prices charged to independent customers.
Skupina Hansol je tudi navedla, da je Komisija z uporabo podatkov o prodaji majhnih zvitkov vključila tudi nekaj prodaje majhnih zvitkov, ki jih ni proizvedel (tj. predelal) zadevni povezani predelovalec, ampak so bili nabavljeni pri povezanih in nepovezanih virih.
Furthermore, the Commission in those proceedings also established that the related parties were operating with reasonable profits, which does not occur in the proceeding at hand (see recital (36)).
Komisija ni imela informacij o nakupnih cenah ali identitetah dobaviteljev v zvezi z nakupi majhnih zvitkov, ki jih je opravil povezani predelovalec.
Therefore, this comment was rejected.
Vendar je mogoče potrditi, da je takšna prodaja kupljenih majhnih zvitkov zajemala 10–15 % (v teži) skupne prodaje majhnih zvitkov nepovezanim strankam.
The Hansol Group also submitted that by using the sales of small rolls, the Commission had also included certain sales of small rolls that had not been produced (i.e. converted) by the related converter in question, but had been purchased from related and unrelated sources.
Glede na to, da je zadevni predelovalec 85–90 % prodanih majhnih zvitkov predelal iz velikih zvitkov, je Komisija menila, da je njen pristop primeren.
The Commission did not have information on the purchase prices or the identities of the suppliers for the purchases of small rolls by this related converter.
Poleg tega je izračun dampinga temeljil na prodajnih cenah majhnih zvitkov.
It could however be verified that such sales of purchased small rolls accounted for 10 % - 15 % (in weight) of the total sales of small rolls to unrelated customers.
Hkrati skupina Hansol ni predložila nobenega dokaza, da se prodajna cena majhnih zvitkov, ki jih proizvede sama, razlikuje od prodajne cene kupljenih majhnih zvitkov.
Considering that 85 % - 90 % of the small rolls sold were converted by the converter in question from jumbo rolls, the Commission considered its approach reasonable.
Zato ni nobenega dokaza, da je manjši delež kupljenih majhnih zvitkov vplival na izračun dampinga.
In addition, the dumping calculation was based on the sales prices of small rolls.
Komisija je zato to trditev zavrnila.
At the same time, the Hansol Group did not provide any evidence showing that the sales price of small rolls would differ for self-produced small rolls as compared to the purchased ones.
Po začasnem in po dokončnem razkritju je skupina Hansol kritizirala vključitev velikih zvitkov iz Unije v izračun dampinga za majhne zvitke.
Hence, there is no evidence that the minor share of purchased small rolls had an impact on the dumping calculation.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 43 začasne uredbe, majhnih zvitkov, proizvedenih iz velikih zvitkov, ki ne izhajajo iz skupine Hansol, zaradi nesledljivosti med prodajo majhnih zvitkov in ustreznimi velikimi zvitki ni bilo mogoče izključiti iz konstruiranja izvozne cene velikih zvitkov, ki so bili predelani v majhne zvitke in kot taki tudi prodani.
Therefore, the Commission rejected this claim.
Ta težava se je pojavila samo zato, ker skupina Hansol za razliko od drugih predelovalcev v Uniji nima vzpostavljenega sistema sledljivosti.
After provisional and after definitive disclosure, the Hansol Group criticised the inclusion of Union sourced jumbo rolls in the dumping calculation for small rolls.
Vseeno je Komisija, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 28–29 zgoraj, omejila možen obseg števila velikih zvitkov, ki ne izhajajo iz skupine Hansol, v tej konstrukciji izvozne cene, tako da je svoj izračun takšne prodaje omejila na povezanega zadevnega predelovalca.
As explained in recital (43) of the provisional Regulation, due to the lack of traceability between the sales of small rolls and the corresponding jumbo rolls, small rolls produced from jumbo rolls with an origin other than Hansol Group could not be excluded from the construction of the export price of jumbo rolls converted into and sold as small rolls.
Ta je predvsem prodajal naprej majhne zvitke, ki jih je proizvajal iz velikih zvitkov, ki jih je skupina Hansol proizvedla in naročila v obdobju preiskave.
This issue only arises because the Hansol Group does not have a traceability system in place, like other converters in the Union have.
Vključitev teh zvitkov bi lahko imela zaradi razmeroma majhnega deleža velikih zvitkov, ki niso izhajali iz skupine Hansol, le majhen vpliv na izračun dampinga, če bi ga sploh imela.
In any case, as also mentioned in recital (28)-(29) above, the Commission limited the potential volume of non-Hansol sourced jumbo rolls presence in this export price construction by limiting its calculation of such sales to the related converter in question.
Izračun dampinga je v vsakem primeru temeljil na prodajni ceni majhnih zvitkov, ki je bila verjetno enaka ne glede na poreklo velikih zvitkov.
The latter was predominantly producing and reselling small rolls from jumbo rolls that were produced by and procured from Hansol Group during the investigation period.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
The inclusion of those rolls could only have a minor impact on the dumping calculation, if at all, due to the relative small proportion of the non-Hansol Group sourced jumbo rolls.
Po dokončnem razkritju je skupina Hansol trdila, da so se pri izračunu konstruirane izvozne cene za nekatere transakcije prevozni stroški odšteli dvakrat in da se je ta dvojni odbitek uporabil tudi za konstruirano ceno CIF, ki je bila uporabljena kot imenovalec.
In any event, the dumping calculation was based on the sales price of small rolls, which was likely to be identical, irrespective of the origin of the jumbo roll.
Trditev je bila ustrezno preverjena in ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bile nekatere prilagoditve pri prodaji majhnih zvitkov s strani povezanega predelovalca, ki so bili kupljeni od skupine Hansol prek povezanega trgovca, odštete dvakrat.
The claim was thus rejected.
Ta napaka je bila zato odpravljena v zvezi s konstrukcijo izvozne cene in cene CIF.
After definitive disclosure, the Hansol Group claimed that, for certain transactions, transport costs had been deducted twice when calculating the constructed export price and this double deduction had also been applied to the constructed CIF price which had been used as a denominator.
Tudi v zvezi z izračunom konstruirane izvozne cene je skupina Hansol trdila, da se pri odbitku prilagoditev od prodajne cene majhnega zvitka za nepovezane stranke ni v zadostni meri upoštevala prisotnost določenih količin nekorejskega osnovnega materiala, kar je povzročilo prenapihnjene podatke o prilagoditvah na splošno.
The claim was duly verified and it was established that indeed for the related converter's sales of small rolls which had been purchased from Hansol Group through the related trader certain allowances had been deducted twice.
Po preučitvi te trditve je bilo ugotovljeno, da dejansko ni bilo upravičeno upoštevati prilagoditev pri izračunu korejske izvozne cene franko tovarna za del majhnih zvitkov, izdelanih iz velikih zvitkov evropskega izvora.
This error was thus corrected with regard to both the export price and CIF price construction.
To je bilo za reprezentativni obseg prodaje malih zvitkov popravljeno z odbitkom prilagoditev le do ravni CIF.
Also regarding the calculation of the constructed export price, the Hansol Group claimed that as regards the deduction of allowances from the sales price of the small roll to unrelated customers, insufficient account had been taken of the presence of certain volumes of non-Korean base material, resulting in inflated allowances overall.
Na podlagi informacij v spisu je bilo ugotovljeno, da je evropski proizvajalec prodal velike zvitke povezanemu predelovalcu skupine Hansol v skladu z dobavnimi pogoji CIP.
After having verified this claim, it was established that it was indeed not justified to apply the allowances for calculating a Korean ex-works export price for the portion of small rolls produced from European sourced jumbo rolls.
V zvezi s to prodajo se je izračunana vrednost CIF štela za primerljivo vrednosti franko tovarna za del prodaje s korejskim poreklom.
This was corrected by deducting, for a representative volume of small roll sales, allowances up to CIF level only.
Po dodatnem dokončnem razkritju je skupina Hansol izpodbijala dejstvo, da so bile revidirane prilagoditve na enoto izračunane kot tehtano povprečje za vse vrste izdelka, in je predlagala, da se za eno vrsto izdelka izračunajo na osnovi specifičnih prilagoditev, nastalih ob prodajah med družbami le za zadevno vrsto izdelka.
Indeed, on the basis of the information on the file, it could be established that the European producer had sold the jumbo rolls to Hansol's related converter according to the CIP delivery terms.
Komisija je menila, da obseg nakupov te vrste izdelka s strani povezanega predelovalca, ki bi se lahko uporabil za ta izračun, v obdobju preiskave ni bil dovolj reprezentativen, da bi se lahko bil zanesljiva osnova za določitev prilagoditev za izračun korejske izvozne cene franko tovarna za zadevno vrsto izdelka.
The calculated CIF value was considered, for these sales, to be comparable for the ex-works value of the share of sales with Korean origin.
Dejansko je bila večina količin te vrste izdelka nabavljena pred drugega povezanega nakupnega kanala, ki ni bil uporabljen pri tem izračunu.
After the additional final disclosure, the Hansol Group contested the fact that the revised unit allowances had been calculated as a weighted average for all product types and it proposed to base it, for one product type, on the specific allowances incurred on inter-company sales of that product type only.
Poleg tega skupina Hansol ni mogla dokazati, da metoda Komisije za izračun in uporabo povprečja ni bila pravilna.
The Commission considered that the volume of purchases by the related converter of that particular product type that could be used for this calculation, during the investigation period, was not sufficiently representative to form a reliable basis for establishing the allowances for calculating a Korean ex-works export price of that product type.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Indeed, most volumes of that product type were sourced through another related purchase channel which was not used for this calculation.
V zvezi s prodajnimi, splošnimi in administrativnimi stroški, ki so bili izračunani in uporabljeni za prodajo prek enega povezanega trgovca v Uniji, je skupina Hansol po začasnem in ponovno po dokončnem razkritju izpodbijala znesek, ki ga je Komisija v razpredelnici poslovnega izida povezanega trgovca dodala kot strošek v zvezi s stroški upravljanja.
Moreover, the Hansol Group could not demonstrate that the Commission's method to calculate and apply an average was not accurate.
V zvezi s tem Komisija opozarja, da je zadevni povezani trgovec od podjetje Hansol Korea in drugih povezanih predelovalcev prejel finančni prispevek v zvezi s stroški upravljanja.
The claim was therefore rejected.
Ti prispevki so bili vključeni v razpredelnico poslovnega izida povezanega trgovca kot prihodek, kar je Komisija sprejela.
With regard to the SG&A calculated and applied for sales through one related trader in the Union, the Hansol Group contested after provisional and again after definitive disclosure that the amount added by the Commission as an expense in the related trader's profit & loss table with regard to management expenses.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je v takih okoliščinah ustrezno, da se upošteva tudi 100 % povezanih stroškov, tj. stroškov plač za zadevne vodstvene delavce.
In this respect, the Commission recalls that the related trader in question had received, from Hansol Korea and other related converters, a financial contribution relating to management expenses.
Ti stroški so bili ugotovljeni med preverjanjem na kraju samem v Koreji in so bili preračunani v evre po povprečnem menjalnem tečaju v obdobju preiskave, ki ga je zagotovila Komisija, ter preneseni v razpredelnico poslovnega izida povezanega trgovca kot odhodek.
Those fees were included in the related trader's profit & loss table as an income and that had been accepted by the Commission.
Na ta način je bila obravnava prispevkov za upravljanje (prihodek) uravnotežena z obravnavo plač vodstvenih delavcev (stroški).
The Commission found it appropriate, under these circumstances, to take also into account 100 % of the related expenses, i.e. the salary expenses for the managers in question.
Skupina Hansol je trdila, da je povezani trgovec ustvarjal promet le v delu obdobja preiskave in da nihče od vodstvenih delavcev ni bil vpleten v prodajo zadevnega izdelka.
These costs had been identified during the on-spot verification in Korea, were converted into Euro currency using the average investigation period exchange rate provided by the Commission and transferred to the profit & loss table of the related trader as an expense.
Uporabljeni številčni podatek o prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroških je bil zato precenjen.
In this way the treatment of the management fees (income) has been brought in balance with the treatment of the management salaries (expenses).
Pristop Komisije je bil, da se določi stopnja prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov (vključno z zadevnimi stroški) povezanega trgovca v razmerju do skupnega prometa tega trgovca.
The Hansol Group claimed that the related trader had only generated turnover for part of the investigated period and that none of the managers had been involved in the sales of the product concerned.
Ta promet se v celoti nanaša na zadevni izdelek.
Therefore, the SG&A figure used had been overstated.
Tudi če so nazadnje upoštevani prodajni, splošni in administrativni stroški morda delno nastali, preden je bil ustvarjen promet, to ne pomeni, da s tem prometom niso povezani, saj so ti stroški nastali z namenom, da se doseže ta promet.
The Commission's approach was to establish the SG&A rate (including the expenses in question) of the related trader in relation to the total turnover of that trader.
Zato je Komisija menila, da je bil uporabljeni pristop pravilen.
That turnover relates in its totality to the product concerned.
Po začasnem in po dokončnem razkritju je skupina Hansol trdila, da bi morala Komisija prerazvrstiti prodajo ene vrste izdelka prek povezanega predelovalca, ker je bil končni stranki izdan račun za drugo vrsto izdelka, kot jo je dejansko prejela.
Even if the SG&A costs eventually considered may partly have been incurred before the turnover was generated, that does not disconnect them from this turnover as the costs had been incurred with a view to achieving this turnover.
V zvezi s tem vprašanjem je Komisija med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem ugotovila, da je povezani predelovalec od skupine Hansol kupil določeno količino velikih zvitkov, ki vsebujejo razvijalec bisfenol S, vendar je bil ta izdelek nato nadalje prodan nepovezanemu kupcu kot izdelek, ki vsebuje razvijalec bisfenol A. Trditev je bila ustrezno preverjena in opozoriti je treba na naslednje.
Therefore, the Commission considered that the approach taken was accurate.
Stran ni predložila nobenih dokazov, da je zavajajoči opis proizvoda na stopnji nadaljnje prodaje vplival tudi na njegovo prodajno ceno.
With regard to this issue, the Commission found during the on spot verification that the related converter purchased from Hansol group some quantity of jumbo rolls containing the developer Bisphenol-S but this product had been subsequently resold to an unrelated customer as containing the developer Bisphenol-A.
Primerjava
The claim was duly verified and the following is noted.
Kadar je Komisija to lahko upravičila s potrebo po zagotovitvi poštene primerjave, je v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno prilagodila za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
First, the two products are clearly different product types which have a different cost of production and are sold on the Korean domestic market at different prices.
Po pripombah skupine Hansol po začasnem razkritju je bila trditev glede načina izračuna in uporabe stroškov predelave sprejeta.
Second, the fact that the related converter, in its invoicing, has sold the product as a different product type on the Union market is, as such, not a valid reason for disregarding the actual product specifications for the purpose of price comparison.
Zaradi tega popravka je bila ugotovljena tudi podobna metodološka napaka glede odštetja nekaterih prilagoditev za stroške prevoza, ki je bila torej popravljena.
The party had not provided any evidence that the misleading product description at the resale stage also affected its selling price.
Po pripombi skupine Hansol je bila popravljena tudi administrativna napaka v zvezi z izračunom.
Consequently, the claim was rejected.
Nazadnje, skupina Hansol je trdila še, da bi bilo treba odobriti več prilagoditev (v zvezi s stroški kredita in povračilom dajatev) ter pregledati metodologijo za izračun stroškov prevoza v zadevni državi, in sicer z uporabo metode razporeditve, ki jo je zagotovila skupina Hansol.
Comparison
Komisija je sprejela tudi te trditve ter ustrezno prilagodila izračune normalne vrednosti in/ali izvozne cene.
Following the comments of the Hansol Group after provisional disclosure, a claim concerning the calculation method and application of the conversion costs was accepted.
Tehtanje stopenj dampinga
This correction resulted also in the identification of a similar methodological error with regard to the deduction of certain transport cost allowances, which was thus corrected.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 46 začasne uredbe, je bila začasna stopnja dampinga, določena za skupino Hansol, tehtano povprečje stopenj dampinga, določenih za prodajo velikih zvitkov (0,5- do 5-odstotna stopnja s težo 15 %–25 %) in prodajo majhnih zvitkov (10- do 15-odstotna stopnja s težo 75 %–85 %).
Furthermore, a clerical calculation error was corrected subsequent to the Hansol Group's comment.
To tehtanje je temeljilo na obsegu prodaje skupine Hansol v Uniji povezanim in nepovezanim strankam v obdobju preiskave.
Finally, the Hansol Group also claimed that a number of allowances (related to credit costs and duty drawback) should have been granted and the methodology for calculating the freight costs in the country concerned should be revised by applying the allocation method provided by the Hansol Group.
Skupina Hansol je po začasnem in po dokončnem razkritju trdila, da ni bilo pravne podlage za uporabo takšnega tehtanja in da je tehtanje temeljilo na neutemeljenih predpostavkah.
The Commission also accepted these claims and adjusted the normal value and/or export price calculations accordingly.
Ta trditev je bila zavrnjena, saj je tehtanje temeljilo na obsegih uvoza zadevnega izdelka v obdobju preiskave, kot jih je sporočila skupina Hansol.
Dumping margin
Komisija meni, da je primerno prilagoditi utež stopnje dampinga, določeno za prodajo povezanim stranem (za nadaljnjo prodajo majhnih zvitkov nepovezanim strankam), njeni dejanski uteži, ker je bila v obdobju preiskave na ravni meja Unije.
Weighting of the dumping margins
Skupina Hansol je tudi ugovarjala dejstvu, da je Komisija konstruirala ceno CIF, uporabljeno kot imenovalec za to prodajo, kadar so jih povezane strani v Uniji predelale v manjše zvitke, preden so se prodali nepovezanim uporabnikom.