natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to reduce administrative burden for small farmers, a further derogation should be introduced, exempting small farmers from declaring parcels on which a payment application is not made.
Da bi zmanjšali upravno breme za male kmete, bi bilo treba uvesti nadaljnje odstopanje, s čimer bi male kmete izvzeli iz obveznosti prijave parcel, na katerih vloga za plačilo ni predložena.
Having regard to practical and specific difficulties that the harmonisation of the payment deadlines for area-related payments between the EAGF and the EAFRD has given rise to, the transitional period should be extended by one more year.
Ob upoštevanju praktičnih in posebnih težav, do katerih je privedla uskladitev plačilnih rokov za plačila na površino med EKJS in EKSRP, bi bilo treba prehodno obdobje podaljšati za eno leto.
However, as regards area-related rural development measures, in order to maintain farmers' cash-flow, payments of advances before 16 October should remain possible.
Kar pa zadeva ukrepe za razvoj podeželja, vezane na površino, bi morala še naprej biti mogoča plačila predplačil pred 16. oktobrom, da bi ohranili denarni tok kmetov.
In order to accommodate the diversity of agricultural systems across the Union, it is appropriate to allow Member States to consider ploughing up, which is relevant for the agronomic and environmental aspects, as a criterion to be used for the classification of permanent grassland.
Da bi upoštevali raznolikost kmetijskih sistemov po Uniji, je ustrezno, da se državam članicam omogoči, da oranje, ki je pomembno za agronomske in okoljske vidike, upoštevajo kot merilo, ki se uporablja za opredelitev trajnega travinja.
Certain shrubs or trees which are not directly grazed by animals may nevertheless produce animal feed.
Določeno grmičevje ali drevesa, na katerih se neposredno ne pasejo živali, se lahko vseeno uporabljajo za proizvodnjo živalske krme.
Member States should be allowed to include those shrubs or trees in permanent grassland where grasses and other herbaceous forage remain predominant, in the whole or in part of their territory.
Kadar trave in druge zelene krmne rastline ostajajo prevladujoče na celotnem ozemlju ali na delu ozemlja držav članic, bi slednje morale imeti možnost vključiti to grmičevje ali drevesa v trajno travinje.
In order to clarify the classification prior to 2018 of land lying fallow as arable land, where it had been in place for five years or more, and provide certainty to the farmers concerned, Member States should be able to maintain its classification as arable land in 2018.
Za pojasnitev opredelitve pred letom 2018 zemljišča v prahi kot ornega zemljišča, kadar je to obstajalo najmanj pet let, in za zagotovitev pravne varnosti zadevnim kmetom, bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da v letu 2018 ohranijo njegovo opredelitev kot orno zemljišče.
Land which can be grazed, where grasses and other herbaceous forage are not predominant or are absent, and where the grazing practices are neither traditional in character nor important for the conservation of biotopes and habitats, may nevertheless have relevant grazing value in certain areas.
Zemljišča, ki se lahko uporabljajo za pašo, kadar trave in druge zelene krmne rastline ne prevladujejo ali jih ni ter kadar prakse paše niso niti tradicionalne po svoji naravi niti pomembne za ohranitev biotopov in habitatov, imajo na nekaterih območjih lahko kljub temu ustrezno vrednost za pašo.
Member States should be allowed to consider those areas as permanent grassland in the whole or in part of their territory.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da navedene površine štejejo za trajno travinje na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali na delu svojega ozemlja.
The experience gained in the first years of implementation of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8] has shown that certain Member States applying the single area payment scheme did not use the entire amount of the funds available under the budgetary ceilings laid down in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1089 [9].
Izkušnje, pridobljene v prvih letih izvajanja Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8], so pokazale, da nekatere države članice, ki so uporabljale shemo enotnega plačila na površino, niso porabile celotnega zneska razpoložljivih sredstev do proračunskih zgornjih mej, določenih v Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) 2015/1089 [9].
Member States applying the basic payment scheme already have the possibility, within certain limits, of distributing payment entitlements for a higher value than the amount available for their basic payment scheme in order to ensure a more efficient use of the funds.
Države članice, ki uporabljajo shemo osnovnega plačila, že imajo možnost – v določenih mejah – da razdelijo plačilne pravice za večjo vrednost od zneska, ki je na razpolago za njihovo shemo osnovnega plačila, da tako zagotovijo učinkovitejšo porabo sredstev.
Member States applying the single area payment scheme should also be allowed, within the same common limits and without prejudice to the respect of the net ceilings for direct payments, to calculate the necessary amount by which their single area payment scheme ceiling may be increased.
Države članice, ki uporabljajo shemo enotnega plačila na površino, bi morale imeti tudi možnost, da znotraj istih skupnih omejitev in brez poseganja v spoštovanje neto zgornjih mej za neposredna plačila izračunajo potrebni znesek, za katerega se lahko poveča zgornja meja njihove sheme enotnega plačila na površino.
Certain Member States operate national fiscal or social security registers in which farmers are registered for their agricultural activities.
Nekatere države članice vodijo nacionalne davčne registre ali registre socialne varnosti, v katerih so kmetje registrirani za svoje kmetijske dejavnosti.
Those Member States should be able to exclude from eligibility for direct payments farmers who are not registered accordingly.
Tem državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da iz upravičenosti do neposrednih plačil izključijo kmete, ki niso ustrezno registrirani.
As experience acquired in the past showed that support was in a number of cases granted to natural or legal persons whose business purpose was not, or was only marginally, targeted at an agricultural activity, Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 introduced the active farmer clause.
Ker so izkušnje iz preteklosti pokazale, da je bila podpora v številnih primerih dodeljena fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, katerih poslovni namen ni bil ali pa je bil le v zanemarljivi meri usmerjen v kmetijsko dejavnost, je bila z Uredbo (EU) št. 1307/2013 uvedena klavzula o aktivnem kmetu.
Pursuant thereto, Member States are to refrain from granting direct payments to certain persons unless such persons can demonstrate that their agricultural activity is not marginal.
Na tej podlagi države članice neposrednih plačil ne smejo dodeljevati določenim osebam, razen če lahko take osebe dokažejo, da njihova kmetijska dejavnost ni zanemarljiva.
However, subsequent experience shows that implementing the three criteria for being regarded as an active farmer, listed in the third subparagraph of Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, has proven difficult for many Member States.
Vendar pa so kasnejše izkušnje, pokazale, da je bilo izvajanje treh meril, v skladu s katerimi se oseba šteje za aktivnega kmeta in ki so našteta v tretjem pododstavku člena 9(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013, težavno za številne države članice.
In order to reduce the administrative burden associated with the implementation of those three criteria, Member States should have the possibility to decide that only one or two of them are made available to demonstrate that a person is an active farmer.
Za zmanjšanje upravnega bremena, povezanega z izvajanjem navedenih treh meril, bi morale imeti države članice možnost določiti, da sta v namen dokazovanja, da je oseba aktivni kmet, na razpolago le eno ali dve od njih.
Moreover, the experience of some Member States is that the difficulties and the administrative costs of implementing the elements relating to the list of activities or businesses as provided for in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, has outweighed the benefit of excluding a very limited number of non-active beneficiaries from the direct support schemes.
Poleg tega so po izkušnjah nekaterih držav članic težave in upravni stroški izvajanja elementov, ki se nanašajo na seznam dejavnosti ali podjetij iz člena 9(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013, večji od koristi izključitve zelo omejenega števila neaktivnih upravičencev iz shem neposrednih podpor.
When a Member State considers this to be the case, it should be able to discontinue the application of Article 9 thereof in relation to the list of activities or businesses.
Kadar država članica meni, da je tako, bi morala imeti možnost, da prekine uporabo člena 9 navedene uredbe v zvezi s seznamom dejavnosti ali podjetij.
It is appropriate to make explicit that Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 allows Member States to review, on an annual basis, their decisions on the reduction of the part of the basic payment to be granted to farmers which exceeds EUR 150000, provided that such a review does not lead to a reduction of the amounts available for rural development.
Ustrezno je izrecno navesti, da člen 11 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 državam članicam omogoča, da na letni osnovi pregledajo svoje odločitve glede zmanjšanja dela osnovnega plačila, ki se dodeli kmetom in presega 150000 EUR, če se zaradi tega ne zmanjšajo zneski, ki so na voljo za razvoj podeželja.
To allow Member States to adapt support under the CAP to their specific needs, they should be given appropriate opportunities to review their decision on transferring funds from their direct payments ceiling to their rural development programmes and vice versa.
Da se državam članicam omogoči prilagoditev podpore v okviru SKP njihovim posebnim potrebam, bi jim bilo treba ustrezno omogočiti, da pregledajo svoje odločitve o prenosu sredstev s svoje zgornje meje za neposredna plačila v svoje programe za razvoj podeželja in obratno.
They should therefore be given the possibility to review their decision also with effect from calendar year 2019, provided that any such decision does not entail a decrease in the amounts assigned to rural development.
Zato bi jim bilo treba omogočiti, da pregledajo svojo odločitev tudi z učinkom od koledarskega leta 2019, če se zaradi takšne odločitve ne zmanjšajo zneski, dodeljeni za razvoj podeželja.
In addition to using a linear reduction of the value of payment entitlements under the basic payment scheme to replenish national or regional reserves to facilitate the participation of young farmers and farmers commencing their agricultural activity in the support scheme, Member States should also be allowed to use the same mechanism to finance measures taken to prevent land from being abandoned and to compensate farmers for specific disadvantages.
Poleg uporabe linearnega zmanjšanja vrednosti plačilnih pravic v okviru sheme osnovnega plačila za dopolnitev nacionalnih ali regionalnih rezerv zaradi spodbujanja udeležbe mladih kmetov in kmetov, ki začenjajo opravljati kmetijsko dejavnost, v shemi podpore bi bilo treba državam članicam dovoliti tudi, da isti mehanizem uporabijo za financiranje ukrepov, sprejetih, da se prepreči opuščanje zemljišč in kmetom kompenzira specifične omejitve.
To simplify and improve consistency between the rules applicable to greening measures, the exemption from the ecological focus area obligation applicable to holdings cultivating leguminous crops as a sole crop or in combination with grasses or other herbaceous forage or land lying fallow on more than 75 % of arable land pursuant to point (a) of Article 46(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 should be extended to the obligation of crop diversification.
Za poenostavitev in izboljšanje skladnosti med pravili, ki se uporabljajo za ukrepe zelene komponente, bi bilo treba izvzetje iz obveznosti glede površine z ekološkim pomenom, ki se uporablja za gospodarstva, ki gojijo stročnice kot samostojno kmetijsko rastlino ali v kombinaciji s travami ali drugimi zelenimi krmnimi rastlinami ali kjer je več kot 75 % ornega zemljišča zemljišče v prahi, v skladu s točko (a) člena 46(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013, razširiti na obveznost v zvezi z diverzifikacijo kmetijskih rastlin.
To ensure consistency in the way several types of crops are considered, on account of their substantial share in areas, in relation to the crop diversification requirement, the flexibility in applying the rules of crop diversification under Article 44(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 should be extended to include the cultivation of crops under water for a significant part of the year or for a significant part of the crop cycle.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti pri tem, kako se več vrst kmetijskih rastlin zaradi njihovega znatnega deleža na površinah obravnava v zvezi z zahtevo po diverzifikaciji kmetijskih rastlin, bi bilo treba prožnost pri uporabi pravil glede diverzifikacije kmetijskih rastlin iz člena 44(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 razširiti tudi na gojenje kmetijskih rastlin, ki so velik del leta ali velik del cikla pridelave pod vodo.
In order to streamline the existing exemptions from the crop diversification obligation set out in points (a) and (b) of Article 44(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, applicable to land predominantly used for the production of grasses or other herbaceous forage, or for cultivation of leguminous crops or the cultivation of crops under water, or which is predominantly land lying fallow or permanent grassland, and so as to provide for equal treatment of all farmers with the same land use proportions, the upper limit of 30 hectares of arable land should no longer be applicable.
Da bi poenostavili obstoječe izjeme od zahteve po diverzifikaciji kmetijskih rastlin iz točk (a) in (b) člena 44(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013, ki veljajo za zemljišče, ki se pretežno uporablja za proizvodnjo trav ali drugih zelenih krmnih rastlin, ali za gojenje stročnic ali gojenje kmetijskih rastlin pod vodo ali ki je pretežno zemljišče v prahi ali trajno travinje, in da bi omogočili enakopravno obravnavo vseh kmetov z enakim razmerjem rabe zemljišča, se zgornja meja 30 hektarov ornega zemljišča ne bi smela več uporabljati.
In order to take account of the agronomic specificity of Triticum spelta, it should be considered as a distinct crop for the purpose of Article 44 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013.
Da bi upoštevali agronomske posebnosti Triticum spelta, bi jo bilo treba obravnavati kot ločeno kmetijsko rastlino za namene člena 44 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013.
In order to streamline the existing exemptions from the ecological focus area obligation set out in points (a) and (b) of Article 46(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, applicable to land predominantly used for the production of grasses or other herbaceous forage, or for cultivation of leguminous crops or the cultivation of crops under water, or which is predominantly land lying fallow or permanent grassland, the upper limit of 30 hectares of arable land should no longer be applicable.
Da bi poenostavili obstoječe izjeme od obveznosti glede površine z ekološkim pomenom iz točk (a) in (b) člena 46(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013, ki se nanaša na zemljišče, ki se pretežno uporablja za proizvodnjo trav ali drugih zelenih krmnih rastlin, ali za gojenje stročnic ali gojenje kmetijskih rastlin pod vodo ali ki je pretežno zemljišče v prahi ali trajno travinje, se zgornja meja 30 hektarov ornega zemljišča ne bi smela več uporabljati.
Given the potential for indirect environmental benefits for biodiversity that may be provided by certain permanent crops, the list of ecological focus area types set out in Article 46 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 should be extended to include Miscanthus and Silphium perfoliatum.
Ob upoštevanju možnosti posrednih okoljskih koristi za biotsko raznovrstnost, ki jih lahko zagotovijo nekateri trajni nasadi, bi bilo treba seznam vrst površin z ekološkim pomenom iz člena 46 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 razširiti, tako da bi vključeval prstasti trstikovec (Miscanthus) in obraslo sklediščnico (Silphium perfoliatum).
Considering that the type of vegetation coverage may positively affect the biodiversity contribution of land lying fallow, land lying fallow for melliferous plants should be recognised as a distinct ecological focus area type.
Glede na to, da lahko vrsta rastlinskega pokrova pozitivno vpliva na prispevek zemljišča v prahi k biotski raznovrstnosti, bi bilo treba zemljišče v prahi za medonosne rastline priznati kot ločeno vrsto površin z ekološkim pomenom.
Consequently, weighting factors should be established for Miscanthus, Silphium perfoliatum and land lying fallow for melliferous plants.
Posledično je treba določiti utežne faktorje za površine s prstastim trstikavcem (Miscanthus) in tiste z obraslo sklediščnico (Silphium perfoliatum) ter zemljišča v prahi za medonosne rastline.
Weighting factors should be established in such a way as to reflect their different importance for biodiversity.
Utežne faktorje bi bilo treba določiti na način, ki bo odražal njihov različen pomen za biotsko raznovrstnost.
The introduction of additional ecological focus area types requires the existing weighting factors for areas with nitrogen-fixing crops and for areas with short rotation coppice to be adapted so as to reflect the new balance between all ecological focus area types.
Zaradi uvedbe dodatnih vrst površin z ekološkim pomenom je treba obstoječe utežne faktorje za površine s kmetijskimi rastlinami, ki vežejo dušik, in za površine s panjevci s kratko obhodnjo prilagoditi tako, da bodo odražali novo ravnotežje med vsemi vrstami površin z ekološkim pomenom.
Experience gained with the application of the support scheme for young farmers under Article 50 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 has shown that, in some cases, young farmers cannot benefit from the full five years of support.
Izkušnje, pridobljene z uporabo sheme podpore za mlade kmete v skladu s členom 50 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013, kažejo, da v nekaterih primerih mladi kmetje ne morejo izkoristiti polnih petih let podpore.
While the focus of that support remains on new economic activity by young people starting their farming activities, Member States should facilitate the access of young farmers to the full five years of payment for young farmers also in cases where young farmers have not applied for support immediately after setting up.
Čeprav se ta podpora še naprej osredotoča na nove gospodarske dejavnosti mladih, ki začenjajo opravljati kmetijsko dejavnost, bi morale države članice olajšati dostop mladih kmetov do polnih pet let plačila za mlade kmete tudi v primerih, ko mladi kmetje niso zaprosili za podporo takoj po vzpostavitvi kmetijskega gospodarstva.
Some Member States have assessed that the payment provided to young farmers under Article 50 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 is insufficient to adequately respond to the financial challenges of the initial establishment and the structural adjustment of agricultural holdings set up by young farmers.
Nekatere države članice so ocenile, da plačilo za mlade kmete v skladu s členom 50 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 ne zadostuje za ustrezen odziv na finančne izzive v zvezi z zagonom dejavnosti in strukturno prilagoditvijo kmetijskih gospodarstev, ki jih vzpostavijo mladi kmetje.
To further enhance the prospects for participation of young farmers in farming, Member States should have the possibility to decide to increase the percentage applied to calculate the amount of the payment for young farmers in the range of 25 % to 50 % and irrespective of the calculation method applied.
Da bi dodatno povečali možnosti za vključitev mladih kmetov v kmetovanje, bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da se odločijo za povečanje odstotka, ki se uporabi za izračun zneska plačila za mlade kmete v razponu od 25 % do 50 %, in sicer ne glede na uporabljeni način izračuna.
Such decision should be without prejudice to the 2 % limit of their national ceiling for direct payments to finance the payment for young farmers.
Takšna odločitev ne bi smela posegati v omejitev v višini 2 % njihove nacionalne zgornje meje za neposredna plačila za financiranje plačila za mlade kmete.
In order to enhance clarity with regard to the responsibilities of Member States as far as the production limiting character of voluntary coupled support is concerned, it is appropriate to reformulate Article 52(5) and (6) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013.
Za izboljšanje jasnosti v zvezi s pristojnostmi držav članic, kar zadeva prostovoljno vezano podporo z vidika njenega omejevanja proizvodnje, je ustrezno, da se preoblikuje člen 52(5) in (6) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013.
As the reformulation reflects the current practice since 1 January 2015 with regard to the provisions concerned, it is appropriate that it should apply from claim year 2015.
Ker to preoblikovanje odraža sedanjo prakso, ki traja od 1. januarja 2015, je v zvezi z zadevnimi določbami ustrezno, da se uporablja od leta vložitve zahtevkov 2015.
In order to ensure the greatest possible consistency between Union schemes targeting sectors that, in certain years, are marked by structural market imbalances, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts allowing Member States to decide that voluntary coupled support can continue to be paid until 2020 on the basis of the production units for which such support was granted in a past reference period.
Da se zagotovi čim večja skladnost med shemami Unije, ki so namenjene sektorjem, ki jih v nekaterih letih zaznamujejo strukturna tržna neravnovesja, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejetje delegiranih aktov, s katerimi bo državam članicam omogočeno, da se lahko prostovoljna vezana podpora do leta 2020 še naprej izplačuje na podlagi proizvodnih enot, za katere je bila takšna podpora dodeljena v preteklem referenčnem obdobju.
In order to enhance the flexibility with regard to voluntary coupled support, annual review by the Member States of their support decisions should be allowed with effect from claim year 2019.
Za izboljšanje prožnosti v zvezi s prostovoljno vezano podporo bi bilo treba državam članicam dovoliti letni pregled svojih odločitev o podpori z učinkom od leta vložitve zahtevkov 2019.
One of the major obstacles to the formation of producer organisations, mainly in Member States which are lagging behind as regards the degree of organisation, appears to be the lack of mutual trust and past experiences.
Ena večjih ovir za oblikovanje organizacij proizvajalcev, zlasti v državah članicah, ki zaostajajo pri stopnji organizacije, se zdi pomanjkanje medsebojnega zaupanja in preteklih izkušenj.
In this context, coaching, whereby producer organisations which are functioning show the way to other producer organisations, producer groups or individual producers of fruit and vegetables, could offset that obstacle and should thus be included among the objectives of producer organisations in the fruit and vegetables sector.
Pri tem bi lahko mentoriranje, v okviru katerega uspešne organizacije proizvajalcev usmerjajo druge organizacije proizvajalcev, skupine proizvajalcev ali posamezne proizvajalce sadja in zelenjave, izravnalo to oviro in bi ga bilo zato treba vključiti med cilje organizacij proizvajalcev v sektorju sadja in zelenjave.
In addition to withdrawals for free distribution, it is also appropriate to provide financial support for coaching actions intended to encourage producers to set up organisations meeting the criteria to be recognised in order to benefit from full Union financing within the operational programmes of existing producer organisations.
Poleg umikov za prosto razdelitev je ustrezno določiti finančno pomoč tudi za ukrepe mentoriranja, namenjene spodbujanju proizvajalcev, da ustanovijo organizacije, ki izpolnjujejo merila za priznanje da bi bili upravičeni do polnega financiranja Unije znotraj operativnih programov obstoječih organizacij proizvajalcev.