natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission shall, by 8 March 2020, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures to comply with this Directive.
V poročilu obravnava tudi učinek te direktive na temeljne pravice in svoboščine, vključno na nediskriminacijo, pravno državo ter raven zaščite in pomoči za žrtve terorizma.
The Commission shall, by 8 September 2021, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the added value of this Directive with regard to combating terrorism.
Komisija pri tem upošteva informacije, ki jih države članice predložijo v skladu s Sklepom 2005/671/PNZ in morebitne druge pomembne informacije glede izvajanja pooblastil v skladu s protiteroristično zakonodajo, povezanega s prenosom in izvajanjem te direktive.
The report shall also cover the impact of this Directive on fundamental rights and freedoms, including on non-discrimination, on the rule of law, and on the level of protection and assistance provided to victims of terrorism.
Na podlagi te ocene Komisija po potrebi odloči o primernih nadaljnjih ukrepih.
The Commission shall take into account the information provided by Member States under Decision 2005/671/JHA and any other relevant information regarding the exercise of powers under counter-terrorism laws related to the transposition and implementation of this Directive.
Člen 30
On the basis of this evaluation, the Commission shall, if necessary, decide on appropriate follow-up actions.
Začetek veljavnosti
Article 30
Ta direktiva začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Entry into force
Člen 31
Article 31
Ta direktiva je naslovljena na države članice v skladu s Pogodbama.
Addressees
V Strasbourgu, 15. marca 2017
Done at Strasbourg, 15 March 2017.
Predsednik
The President
UL C 177, 18.5.2016, str. 51.
For the Council
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. februarja 2017 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 7. marca 2017.
OJ C 177, 18.5.2016, p. 51.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/475/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o boju proti terorizmu (UL L 164, 22.6.2002, str. 3).
Position of the European Parliament of 16 February 2017 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 7 March 2017.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2006/960/PNZ z dne 18. decembra 2006 o poenostavitvi izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi kazenskega pregona držav članic Evropske unije (UL L 386, 29.12.2006, str. 89).
Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3).
Sklep Sveta 2008/615/PNZ z dne 23. junija 2008 o poglobitvi čezmejnega sodelovanja, zlasti na področju boja proti terorizmu in čezmejnemu kriminalu (UL L 210, 6.8.2008, str. 1).
Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 December 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union (OJ L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 89).
Sklep Sveta 2005/671/PNZ z dne 20. septembra 2005 o izmenjavi informacij in sodelovanju na področju terorističnih kaznivih dejanj (UL L 253, 29.9.2005, str. 22).
Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) št. 603/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o vzpostavitvi sistema Eurodac za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države ali oseba brez državljanstva, in o zahtevah za primerjavo s podatki iz sistema Eurodac, ki jih vložijo organi kazenskega pregona držav članic in Europol za namene kazenskega pregona, ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1077/2011 o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice (UL L 180, 29.6.2013, str. 1).
Council Decision 2005/671/JHA of 20 September 2005 on the exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences (OJ L 253, 29.9.2005, p. 22).
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami (UL L 190, 18.7.2002, str. 1).
Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States’ law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes, and amending Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 establishing a European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice ( OJ L 180, 29.6.2013, p. 1).
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/465/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o skupnih preiskovalnih enotah (UL L 162, 20.6.2002, str. 1).
Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p. 1).
Direktiva (EU) 2015/849 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. maja 2015 o preprečevanju uporabe finančnega sistema za pranje denarja ali financiranje terorizma, spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter razveljavitvi Direktive 2005/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta in Direktive Komisije 2006/70/ES (UL L 141, 5.6.2015, str. 73).
Council Framework Decision 2002/465/JHA of 13 June 2002 on joint investigation teams (OJ L 162, 20.6.2002, p. 1).
Direktiva 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju) (UL L 178, 17.7.2000, str. 1).
Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (OJ L 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73).
Sklep Sveta 2007/533/PNZ z dne 12. junija 2007 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) (UL L 205, 7.8.2007, str. 63).
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’) ( OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1).
Direktiva (EU) 2016/681 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. aprila 2016 o uporabi podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR) za preprečevanje, odkrivanje, preiskovanje in pregon terorističnih in hudih kaznivih dejanj (UL L 119, 4.5.2016, str. 132).
Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (OJ L 205, 7.8.2007, p. 63).
Direktiva (EU) 2016/680 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. aprila 2016 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov, ki jih pristojni organi obdelujejo za namene preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanja kazenskih sankcij, in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov ter o razveljavitvi Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/977/PNZ (UL L 119, 4.5.2016, str. 89).
Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 132).
Direktiva 2014/41/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. aprila 2014 o evropskem preiskovalnem nalogu v kazenskih zadevah (UL L 130, 1.5.2014, str. 1).
Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89).
Direktiva 2012/29/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o določitvi minimalnih standardov na področju pravic, podpore in zaščite žrtev kaznivih dejanj ter o nadomestitvi Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2001/220/PNZ (UL L 315, 14.11.2012, str. 57).
Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (OJ L 130, 1.5.2014, p. 1).
Direktiva Sveta 2004/80/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o odškodnini žrtvam kaznivih dejanj (UL L 261, 6.8.2004, str. 15).
Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 57).
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/38/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic, ki spreminja Uredbo (EGS) št. 1612/68 in razveljavlja Direktive 64/221/EGS, 68/360/EGS, 72/194/EGS, 73/148/EGS, 75/34/EGS, 75/35/EGS, 90/364/EGS, 90/365/EGS in 93/96/EEC (UL L 158, 30.4.2004, str. 77).
Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims (OJ L 261, 6.8.2004, p. 15).
Direktiva 2013/40/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. avgusta 2013 o napadih na informacijske sisteme in nadomestitvi Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2005/222/PNZ (UL L 218, 14.8.2013, str. 8).
Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77).
Direktiva 2014/42/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. aprila 2014 o začasnem zavarovanju in odvzemu predmetov, ki so bili uporabljeni za kazniva dejanja, in premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, v Evropski uniji (UL L 127, 29.4.2014, str. 39).
Directive 2013/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 on attacks against information systems and replacing Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA (OJ L 218, 14.8.2013, p. 8).
Direktiva (EU) 2017/541 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2017 o boju proti terorizmu in nadomestitvi Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/475/PNZ ter o spremembi Sklepa Sveta 2005/671/PNZ (UL L 73, 31.3.2017, str.
Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union (OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 39).
6).“;
Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA (OJ L 88, 31.3.2017, p.
Države članice uveljavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, do 8. septembra 2018.
6).’;
O tem takoj obvestijo Komisijo.
supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to safeguarding of financial instruments and funds belonging to clients, product governance obligations and the rules applicable to the provision or reception of fees, commissions or any monetary or non-monetary benefits
o dopolnitvi Direktive 2014/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z zaščito finančnih instrumentov in sredstev, ki pripadajo strankam, obveznostmi glede upravljanja produktov in pravili, ki se uporabljajo za zagotavljanje ali prejemanje pristojbin, provizij ali kakršnih koli denarnih ali nedenarnih koristi
Having regard to Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU [1], and in particular Articles 16(12) and 24(13) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2014/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o trgih finančnih instrumentov ter spremembi Direktive 2002/92/ES in Direktive 2011/61/EU [1], in zlasti člena 16(12) in člena 24(13) Direktive;
Directive 2014/65/EU sets out comprehensive regime aiming to ensure investor protection.
Direktiva 2014/65/EU določa celovit sistem za zagotovitev zaščite vlagateljev.
The protection of client financial instruments and funds is an important part of that regime, investment firms being subject to an obligation to make adequate arrangements to safeguard investor's ownership and rights in respect of securities and funds entrusted to an investment firm.
Zaščita finančnih instrumentov in sredstev strank je pomemben del tega sistema, saj morajo investicijska podjetja v zvezi z vrednostnimi papirji in sredstvi, ki so jim bila zaupana, sprejeti ustrezne ureditve za zaščito lastništva in pravic vlagatelja.
Investment firms should have in place proper and specific arrangements to ensure the safeguarding of client financial instruments and funds.
Investicijska podjetja bi morala imeti vzpostavljene ustrezne in specifične ureditve za zagotovitev zaščite finančnih instrumentov in sredstev strank.
In order to further specify the regulatory framework for the protection of investors and increased clarity to clients, and in line with the overall strategy to foster jobs and growth in the Union through an integrated legal and economic framework that is efficient and treats all actors fairly, the Commission has been empowered to adopt detailed rules to address specific risks to investor protection or to market integrity.
Za podrobnejšo opredelitev regulativnega okvira za zaščito vlagateljev in večjo jasnost za stranke in v skladu s splošno strategijo za spodbujanje zaposlovanja in rasti v Uniji prek celovitega pravnega in ekonomskega okvira, ki je učinkovit in pošteno obravnava vse akterje, je bila Komisija pooblaščena za sprejetje podrobnih pravil za obravnavo specifičnih tveganj v zvezi z zaščito vlagateljev ali celovitostjo trga.
Where an investment firm deposits funds it holds on behalf of a client with a qualifying money market fund, the units or shares in that money market fund should be held in accordance with the requirements for holding financial instruments belonging to clients.
Če investicijska podjetja pri kvalificiranem skladu denarnega trga deponirajo sredstva, katerih imetniki so v imenu stranke, bi moralo biti imetništvo enot ali deležev v navedenem skladu denarnega trga v skladu z zahtevami glede imetništva finančnih instrumentov, ki pripadajo strankam.
Clients should be required to explicitly consent to the depositing of those funds.
Od strank bi bilo treba zahtevati izrecno privolitev za deponiranje teh sredstev.
When assessing the quality of money market instrument there should be no mechanistic reliance on external ratings.
Pri ocenjevanju kakovosti instrumentov denarnega trga ne bi smelo prihajati do samodejnega zanašanja na zunanje bonitetne ocene.
However a downgrade below the two highest short-term credit ratings by any agency registered and supervised by ESMA that has rated the instrument should lead the manager to undertake a new assessment of the credit quality of the money market instrument to ensure it continues to be of high quality.
Vendar bi moral v primeru, da katera koli od agencij, ki jih je ESMA registrirala in jih nadzoruje, zniža bonitetno oceno instrumenta, ki ga je ocenila, pod dve najvišji kratkoročni bonitetni oceni, upravitelj izvesti novo oceno kreditne kakovosti instrumenta denarnega trga, da zagotovi, da je ta še naprej visoke kakovosti.
A single officer with overall responsibility for the safeguarding of client instruments and funds should be appointed in order to reduce risks of fragmented responsibility across diverse departments, especially in large and complex firms, and to remedy unsatisfactory situations where firms do not have overarching sight of their means of meeting their obligations.
Imenovati bi bilo treba odgovorno osebo s splošno odgovornostjo za zaščito instrumentov in sredstev strank, da bi zmanjšali tveganja razdrobljene odgovornosti med različnimi službami, zlasti v velikih in kompleksnih podjetjih, ter izboljšali nezadovoljive razmere, ko podjetja nimajo celostnega pregleda nad svojimi načini izpolnjevanja obveznosti.
The single officer should possess sufficient skills and authority in order to discharge duties effectively and without impediment, including the duty to report to the firm's senior management in respect of oversight of the effectiveness of the firm's compliance with the safeguarding of client assets requirements.
Odgovorna oseba bi morala imeti dovolj strokovnega znanja in avtoritete za učinkovito in neovirano opravljanje nalog, vključno z dolžnostjo poročanja višjemu vodstvu podjetja z zvezi z nadziranjem učinkovitosti podjetja pri doseganju skladnosti z zahtevami glede zaščite sredstev strank.
The appointment of a single officer should not preclude that officer from carrying out additional roles where this does not prevent the officer from discharging the duties for safeguarding client financial instruments and funds effectively.
Imenovanje odgovorne osebe tej ne bi smelo preprečiti opravljanja dodatnih vlog, če ji to ne preprečuje učinkovitega opravljanja dolžnosti odgovorne osebe za zaščito finančnih instrumentov in sredstev strank.
Directive 2014/65/EU requires investment firms to safeguard client assets.
Direktiva 2014/65/EU zahteva, da morajo investicijska podjetja zaščititi sredstva strank.
Article 16(10) of Directive 2014/65/EU prohibits firms from concluding title transfer collateral arrangements (TTCAs) with retail clients for the purpose of securing or covering present or future, actual or contingent or prospective obligations.
Člen 16(10) Direktive 2014/65/EU podjetjem prepoveduje sklepanje dogovorov o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju z neprofesionalnimi strankami z namenom zavarovanja ali kritja obstoječih ali prihodnjih, dejanskih ali možnih ali pričakovanih obveznosti.
Investment firms are, however, not prohibited from concluding TTCA with non-retail clients.
Investicijskim podjetjem sicer ni prepovedano sklepati dogovorov o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju z neprofesionalnimi strankami.
There is therefore a risk that without further guidance investment firms could use TTCA more often than reasonably justified when dealing with non-retail clients, undermining the overall regime put in place to protect client assets.
Zato obstaja tveganje, da bi lahko brez nadaljnjih napotkov investicijska podjetja pri poslovanju z neprofesionalnimi strankami take dogovore uporabljala pogosteje, kot bi bilo razumno utemeljeno, kar bi ogrozilo splošno ureditev, vzpostavljeno za zaščito sredstev stranke.
Therefore, in light of the effects of TTCAs on firms' duties towards clients and in order to ensure the safeguarding and segregation rules pursuant to Directive 2014/65/EU are not undermined, investment firms should consider the appropriateness of title transfer collateral arrangements used with non-retail clients by means of the relationship between the client's obligations to the firm and the client assets subject to TTCA.
Zato bi morala glede na učinke dogovorov o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju na dolžnosti podjetij do strank in za zagotovitev spoštovanja pravil o zaščiti in ločitvi nalog v skladu z Direktivo 2014/65/EU investicijska podjetja upoštevati ustreznost dogovorov o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju, uporabljenih z neprofesionalnimi strankami, glede na razmerje med obveznostmi stranke do podjetja in sredstvi stranke, ki so predmet dogovora o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju.
Firms should be allowed to use TTCA with non-retail client only if they demonstrate the appropriateness of TTCA in relation to that client and disclose the risks involved as well as the effect of the TTCA on his assets.
Podjetjem bi moralo biti dovoljeno, da uporabijo dogovor o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju z neprofesionalno stranko samo, če lahko dokažejo primernost dogovora o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju za stranko ter razkrijejo pripadajoča tveganja in učinek dogovora o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju na njena sredstva.
Firms should have a documented process of their use TTCA.
Podjetja bi morala imeti dokumentiran postopek za uporabo dogovorov o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju.
The ability of firms to enter into TTCAs with non-retail clients should not reduce the need to obtain clients' prior express consent to use client assets.
Sposobnost podjetij, da sklenejo dogovore o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju z neprofesionalnimi strankami, ne bi smela zmanjšati potrebe po izrecni predhodni privolitvi strank v uporabo njihovih sredstev.
Demonstrating a robust link between collateral transferred under a TTCA and client's liability should not preclude taking appropriate security against a client's obligation.
Dokazovanje trdne povezave med zavarovanjem, prenesenim v okviru dogovora o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju, in obveznostjo stranke ne bi smelo preprečevati sprejemanja ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepov glede obveznosti stranke.
Investment firms could thus continue to require a sufficient collateral and where appropriate, to do so by a TTCA.
Investicijska podjetja bi tako lahko še naprej zahtevala zadostno zavarovanje s premoženjem in, kadar je to primerno, to storila z dogovorom o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju.
That obligation should not prevent compliance with requirements under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] and should not prohibit the appropriate use of TTCAs in the context of contingent liability transactions or repos for non-retail clients.
Ta obveznost ne bi smela preprečiti skladnosti z zahtevami iz Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] in ne bi smela prepovedati ustrezne uporabe dogovorov o prenosu lastniške pravice na zavarovanju v okviru poslov s pogojnimi obveznostmi ali repo poslov za neprofesionalne stranke.
While some securities financing transactions may require the transfer of title of clients' assets, in that context investment firms should not be able to effect arrangements prohibited under Article 16(10) of Directive 2014/65/EU.
Čeprav lahko nekateri posli financiranja z vrednostnimi papirji zahtevajo prenos lastniške pravice na zavarovanju v zvezi s sredstvi strank, pa investicijskim podjetjem v okviru tega ne bi smelo biti omogočeno, da sklepajo dogovore, ki jih prepoveduje člen 16(10) Direktive 2014/65/EU.
In order to ensure appropriate protection for clients in relation to securities financing transactions (SFTs), investment firms should adopt specific arrangements to ensure that the borrower of client assets provides the appropriate collateral and that the firm monitors the continued appropriateness of such collateral.
Za zagotovitev ustrezne zaščite strank pri poslih financiranja z vrednostnimi papirji bi morala investicijska podjetja sprejeti posebne dogovore, da zagotovijo, da posojilojemalec sredstev strank zagotovi ustrezno zavarovanje s premoženjem in da podjetje spremlja kontinuirano ustreznost takšnega zavarovanja.