natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests of 26 July 1995 [3], including the Protocols thereto of 27 September 1996 [4], of 29 November 1996 [5] and of 19 June 1997 [6] (the ‘Convention’) establishes minimum rules relating to the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of fraud affecting the Union's financial interests.
Konvencija, pripravljena na podlagi člena K.3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti z dne 26. julija 1995 [3] ter njeni protokoli z dne 27. septembra 1996 [4], 29. novembra 1996 [5] in 19. junija 1997 [6] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija) določajo minimalna pravila za opredelitev kaznivih dejanj in sankcij na področju goljufij, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije.
The Member States drew up the Convention, in which it was noted that fraud affecting Union revenue and expenditure in many cases was not confined to a single country and was often committed by organised criminal networks.
Države članice so pripravile Konvencijo, v kateri je ugotovljeno, da goljufije, ki škodijo prihodkom in odhodkom Unije, v številnih primerih niso omejene na eno samo državo in da jih pogosto storijo organizirane kriminalne združbe.
On that basis, it was already recognised in the Convention that the protection of the Union's financial interests called for the criminal prosecution of fraudulent conduct injuring those interests.
Na podlagi tega je bilo v Konvenciji že ugotovljeno, da zaščita finančnih interesov Unije terja kazenski pregon goljufivega ravnanja, ki škodi navedenim interesom.
In parallel, Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 [7] was adopted.
Istočasno je bila sprejeta Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2988/95 [7].
That Regulation lays down general rules relating to homogenous checks and to administrative measures and penalties concerning irregularities with regard to Union law while, at the same time, referring to sectoral rules in that area, fraudulent actions as defined in the Convention and the application of the Member States' criminal law and proceedings.
Navedena uredba določa splošna pravila za enotne preglede ter upravne ukrepe in kazni v zvezi z nepravilnostmi, ki se nanašajo na pravo Unije, obenem pa navaja sektorska pravila na tem področju, goljufiva dejanja, kot so opredeljena v Konvenciji, ter uporabo kazenskega prava in kazenskih postopkov držav članic.
Union policy in the area of the protection of the Union's financial interests has already been the subject of harmonisation measures such as Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95.
V zvezi s politiko Unije na področju zaščite finančnih interesov Unije so bili že sprejeti ukrepi za harmonizacijo, kot je Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2988/95.
In order to ensure the implementation of Union policy in this area, it is essential to continue to approximate the criminal law of the Member States by complementing the protection of the Union's financial interests under administrative and civil law for the most serious types of fraud-related conduct in that field, whilst avoiding inconsistencies, both within and among those areas of law.
Za zagotovitev izvajanja politike Unije na tem področju je za najhujše vrste goljufijam sorodnih ravnanj na tem področju bistvenega pomena nadaljnje približevanje kazenskega prava posameznih držav članic z dopolnjevanjem upravno- in civilnopravne zaščite finančnih interesov Unije, pri čemer bi se bilo treba izogibati neskladnostim znotraj teh pravnih področij in med njimi.
The protection of the Union's financial interests calls for a common definition of fraud falling within the scope of this Directive, which should cover fraudulent conduct with respect to revenues, expenditure and assets at the expense of the general budget of the European Union (the ‘Union budget’), including financial operations such as borrowing and lending activities.
Zaščita finančnih interesov Unije zahteva enotno opredelitev goljufije, ki spada na področje uporabe te direktive, ki bi morala zajemati goljufivo ravnanje v škodo prihodkov, odhodkov in sredstev splošnega proračuna Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: proračun Unije), vključno s finančnimi posli, kot sta najemanje in dajanje posojil.
The notion of serious offences against the common system of value added tax (‘VAT’) as established by Council Directive 2006/112/EC [8] (the ‘common VAT system’) refers to the most serious forms of VAT fraud, in particular carousel fraud, VAT fraud through missing traders, and VAT fraud committed within a criminal organisation, which create serious threats to the common VAT system and thus to the Union budget.
Pojem hudih kaznivih dejanj zoper skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost (DDV), vzpostavljen z Direktivo Sveta 2006/112/ES [8] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupni sistem DDV), zadeva najhujše oblike goljufij na področju DDV, zlasti davčni vrtiljak, goljufije na področju DDV z neplačujočimi gospodarskimi subjekti in goljufije na področju DDV, storjene v sklopu hudodelskih združb, ki resno ogrožajo skupni sistem DDV, s tem pa proračun Unije.
Offences against the common VAT system should be considered to be serious where they are connected with the territory of two or more Member States, result from a fraudulent scheme whereby those offences are committed in a structured way with the aim of taking undue advantage of the common VAT system and the total damage caused by the offences is at least EUR 10000000.
Kazniva dejanja zoper skupni sistem DDV bi morala veljati za huda kazniva dejanja, kadar zadevajo ozemlje dveh ali več držav članic in izhajajo iz sistema goljufije, pri čemer se ta kazniva dejanja storijo na strukturiran način in z namenom pridobitve neupravičene prednosti prek skupnega sistema DDV, skupna škoda, povzročena s kaznivimi dejanji, pa znaša vsaj 10000000 EUR.
The notion of total damage refers to the estimated damage that results from the entire fraud scheme, both to the financial interests of the Member States concerned and to the Union, excluding interest and penalties.
Pojem „skupna škoda“ se nanaša na ocenjeno škodo, ki je posledica celotnega sistema goljufije in ki nastane tako finančnim interesom zadevnih držav članic kot Uniji, brez obresti in kazni.
This Directive aims to contribute to the efforts to fight those criminal phenomena.
Ta direktiva naj bi prispevala k prizadevanjem za boj proti tovrstnim kriminalnim pojavom.
When the Commission implements the Union budget under shared or indirect management, it may delegate budget implementation tasks to the Member States or entrust them to bodies, offices or agencies established pursuant to the Treaties or to other entities or persons.
Pri izvrševanju proračuna Unije na podlagi deljenega ali posrednega upravljanja lahko Komisija naloge izvrševanja proračuna prenese na države članice ali pa jih poveri organom, uradom ali agencijam, ustanovljenim na podlagi Pogodb, oziroma drugim subjektom ali osebam.
In the event of such shared or indirect management, the Union's financial interests should benefit from the same level of protection as they do when under the direct management of the Commission.
V primeru deljenega ali posrednega upravljanja bi morali biti finančni interesi Unije deležni enake ravni zaščite kot pri neposrednem upravljanju s strani Komisije.
For the purposes of this Directive, procurement-related expenditure is any expenditure in connection with the public contracts determined by Article 101(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9].
V tej direktivi so odhodki, povezani z javnim naročanjem, vsi odhodki, ki zadevajo javna naročila, kot so določena v členu 101(1) Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9].
Union money laundering law is fully applicable to money laundering involving property derived from the criminal offences covered by this Directive.
Za pranje denarja, ki zadeva premoženje, pridobljeno s kaznivimi dejanji, ki jih zajema ta direktiva, se v celoti uporablja pravo Unije s področja pranja denarja.
A reference made to that law should ensure that the sanctioning regime introduced by this Directive applies to all serious cases of criminal offences against the Union's financial interests.
S sklicevanjem na navedeno pravo bi morali zagotoviti, da sankcije, ki jih uvaja ta direktiva, veljajo za vse hujše primere kaznivih dejanj zoper finančne interese Unije.
Corruption constitutes a particularly serious threat to the Union's financial interests, which can in many cases also be linked to fraudulent conduct.
Korupcija pomeni še posebej resno grožnjo finančnim interesom Unije in je v številnih primerih lahko povezana tudi z goljufivim ravnanjem.
Since all public officials have a duty to exercise judgment or discretion impartially, the giving of bribes in order to influence a public official's judgment or discretion and the taking of such bribes should be included in the definition of corruption, irrespective of the law or regulations applicable in the particular official's country or to the international organisation concerned.
Ker je dolžnost vseh javnih uslužbencev, da so pri presojanju ali izvajanju diskrecijske pravice nepristranski, bi moralo biti v opredelitev korupcije – ne glede na pravo ali predpise, ki se uporabljajo v državi posameznega javnega uslužbenca ali v zadevni mednarodni organizaciji – zajeto tudi dajanje podkupnin z namenom vplivanja na presojo javnega uslužbenca ali na izvajanje njegove diskrecijske pravice ter jemanje takih podkupnin.
The Union's financial interests can be negatively affected by certain types of conduct of a public official who is entrusted with the management of funds or assets, whether he or she is in charge or acts in a supervisory capacity, which types of conduct aim at misappropriating funds or assets, contrary to the intended purpose and whereby the Union's financial interests are damaged.
Na finančne interese Unije lahko negativno vplivajo nekatere vrste ravnanja javnega uslužbenca, ki mu je kot pristojnemu ali kot nadzorniku poverjeno upravljanje sredstev, pri čemer je cilj teh vrst ravnanja poneverba sredstev, v nasprotju s predvidenim namenom in so z njim oškodovani finančni interesi Unije.
There is therefore a need to introduce a precise definition of criminal offences covering such conduct.
Zato je treba natančno opredeliti kazniva dejanja, ki zajemajo takšno ravnanje.
As regards the criminal offences of passive corruption and misappropriation, there is a need to include a definition of public officials covering all relevant officials, whether holding a formal office in the Union, in the Member States or in third countries.
Glede kaznivih dejanj pasivne korupcije in poneverbe je treba vključiti takšno opredelitev javnih uslužbencev, ki bo zajemala vse zadevne uradnike, ne glede na to, ali imajo uradni položaj v Uniji, v državah članicah ali v tretjih državah.
Private persons are increasingly involved in the management of Union funds.
Zasebniki so vse bolj dejavno vključeni v upravljanje sredstev Unije.
In order to protect Union funds adequately from corruption and misappropriation, the definition of ‘public official’ therefore needs to cover persons who do not hold formal office but who are nonetheless assigned and exercise, in a similar manner, a public service function in relation to Union funds, such as contractors involved in the management of such funds.
Da bi sredstva Unije ustrezno zaščitili pred korupcijo in poneverbo, mora opredelitev pojma „javni uslužbenec“ zajemati osebe, ki sicer nimajo uradnega položaja, a jim je bila na podoben način zaupana javna funkcija v zvezi s sredstvi Unije in to funkcijo opravljajo, na primer pogodbeni izvajalci, vključeni v upravljanje takšnih sredstev.
With regard to the criminal offences provided for in this Directive, the notion of intention must apply to all the elements constituting those criminal offences.
Kar zadeva kazniva dejanja, določena v tej direktivi, se mora koncept namena nanašati na vse elemente, ki tvorijo navedena kazniva dejanja.
The intentional nature of an act or omission may be inferred from objective, factual circumstances.
Naklepna narava dejanja ali opustitve dejanja se lahko ugotovi na podlagi objektivnih stvarnih okoliščin.
Criminal offences which do not require intention are not covered by this Directive.
Kazniva dejanja, pri katerih ni potreben naklep, niso zajeta v tej direktivi.
This Directive does not oblige Member States to provide for sanctions of imprisonment for the commission of criminal offences that are not of a serious nature, in cases where intent is presumed under national law.
Ta direktiva v primerih, ko se po nacionalnem pravu naklep domneva, državam članicam ne nalaga, da za storitev kaznivih dejanj, ki niso huda kazniva dejanja, predpišejo sankcijo zapora.
Some criminal offences against the Union's financial interests are in practice often closely related to the criminal offences covered by Article 83(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Union legislative acts that are based on that provision.
Nekatera kazniva dejanja zoper finančne interese Unije so v praksi pogosto tesno povezana s kaznivimi dejanji, ki so zajeta v členu 83(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske Unije (PDEU) in v zakonodajnih aktih Unije, sprejetih na podlagi navedene določbe.
Coherence between such legislative acts and this Directive should therefore be ensured in the wording of this Directive.
Zato bi bilo treba pri oblikovanju določb te direktive zagotoviti usklajenost med navedenimi zakonodajnimi akti in to direktivo.
Insofar as the Union's financial interests can be damaged or threatened by conduct attributable to legal persons, legal persons should be liable for the criminal offences, as defined in this Directive, which are committed on their behalf.
Kolikor so finančni interesi Unije lahko oškodovani ali ogroženi zaradi ravnanja, ki ga je mogoče pripisati pravnim osebam, bi morale biti pravne osebe odgovorne za kazniva dejanja, ki so opredeljena v tej direktivi in ki so storjena v njihovem imenu.
In order to ensure equivalent protection of the Union's financial interests throughout the Union by means of measures which should act as a deterrent, Member States should provide for certain types and levels of sanctions when the criminal offences defined in this Directive are committed.
Da bi po vsej Uniji zagotovili enakovredno zaščito finančnih interesov Unije z ukrepi, ki bi morali delovati odvračilno, bi države članice morale določiti seznam in razpon sankcij za storitev kaznivih dejanj, opredeljenih v tej direktivi.
The levels of sanctions should not go beyond what is proportionate for the offences.
Razpon sankcij ne bi smel presegati tistega, kar je sorazmerno za kazniva dejanja.
As this Directive provides for minimum rules, Member States are free to adopt or maintain more stringent rules for criminal offences affecting the Union's financial interests.
Ker ta direktiva določa minimalna pravila, lahko države članice za kazniva dejanja, ki škodujejo finančnim interesom Unije, sprejmejo ali ohranijo tudi strožja pravila.
This Directive does not affect the proper and effective application of disciplinary measures or penalties other than of a criminal nature.
Ta direktiva ne vpliva na pravilno in učinkovito uporabo disciplinskih ukrepov ali sankcij, ki niso kazenske sankcije.
Sanctions that cannot be equated to criminal sanctions, which are imposed on the same person for the same conduct, can be taken into account when sentencing that person for a criminal offence defined in this Directive.
Sankcije, ki jih ni mogoče enačiti s kazenskimi sankcijami in ki so bile zadevni osebi izrečene za isto ravnanje, se lahko upoštevajo pri izrekanju sankcij tej osebi za kaznivo dejanje, opredeljeno v tej direktivi.
For other sanctions, the principle of prohibition of being tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence (ne bis in idem) should be fully respected.
Glede drugih sankcij bi bilo treba v celoti spoštovati načelo prepovedi ponovnega sojenja ali kaznovanja za isto kaznivo dejanje (ne bis in idem).
This Directive does not criminalise behaviour which is not also subject to disciplinary penalties or other measures concerning a breach of official duties, in cases where such disciplinary penalties or other measures can be applied to the persons concerned.
Ta direktiva ne določa kaznivosti ravnanja, za katero niso predpisane tudi disciplinske sankcije ali drugi ukrepi v zvezi s kršitvijo uradnih dolžnosti, kadar se take disciplinske sankcije ali drugi ukrepi lahko uporabijo za zadevne osebe.
Sanctions with regard to natural persons should, in certain cases, provide for a maximum penalty of at least four years of imprisonment.
V okviru sankcij za fizične osebe bi morala biti v nekaterih primerih najvišja predpisana sankcija najmanj štiri leta zapora.
Such cases should include at least those involving considerable damage done or advantage gained whereby the damage or advantage should be presumed to be considerable when it involves more than EUR 100000.
To bi moralo zajemati vsaj primere, pri katerih je povzročena znatna škoda ali pridobljena znatna korist, pri čemer bi morala škoda ali korist šteti za znatno, če presega 100000 EUR.
Where a Member State's law does not provide for an explicit threshold for considerable damage or advantage as a basis for a maximum penalty, the Member State should ensure that the amount of damage or advantage is taken into account by its courts in the determination of sanctions for fraud and other criminal offences affecting the Union's financial interests.
Kadar pravo države članice ne določa izrecnega praga za znatno škodo ali znatno korist, ki bi bil podlaga za najvišjo predpisano sankcijo, bi morala država članica zagotoviti, da njena sodišča pri določanju sankcij za kazniva dejanja goljufije in druga kazniva dejanja, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, upoštevajo višino škode ali koristi.
This Directive does not prevent Member States from providing for other elements which would indicate the serious nature of a criminal offence, for instance when the damage or advantage is potential, but of very considerable nature.
Ta direktiva državam članicam ne preprečuje, da bi določale druge elemente, na podlagi katerih lahko kaznivo dejanje velja za hudo kaznivo dejanje, na primer kadar je škoda ali prednost potencialna, vendar zelo velika.
However, for offences against the common VAT system, the threshold as of which the damage or advantage should be presumed to be considerable is, in conformity with this Directive, EUR 10000000.
Vendar pa bi za kazniva dejanja zoper skupni sistem DDV prag, nad katerim bi morala škoda ali korist šteti za znatno, v skladu s to direktivo moral znašati 10000000 EUR.
The introduction of minimum levels of maximum imprisonment sanctions is necessary in order to ensure equivalent protection of the Union's financial interests throughout the Union.
Uvedba minimalnih ravni najvišjih predpisanih sankcij zapora je nujna za zagotovitev enakovredne zaščite finančnih interesov Unije po vsej Uniji.
The sanctions are intended to serve as a strong deterrent for potential offenders, with effect throughout the Union.
Sankcije naj bi imele močan odvračilni učinek na potencialne storilce, z učinkom po vsej Uniji.
Member States should ensure that the fact that a criminal offence is committed within a criminal organisation as defined in Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA [10] is considered to be an aggravating circumstance in accordance with the applicable rules established by their legal systems.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da dejstvo, da kaznivo dejanje stori hudodelska združba, kot je opredeljena v Okvirnem sklepu Sveta 2008/841/PNZ [10], šteje za obteževalno okoliščino v skladu z veljavnimi pravili, določenimi v njihovih pravnih sistemih.
They should ensure that the aggravating circumstance is made available to judges for their consideration when sentencing offenders, although there is no obligation on judges to take the aggravating circumstance into account in their sentence.
Zagotoviti bi morale, da imajo sodniki možnost, da to obteževalno okoliščino upoštevajo pri izrekanju sankcij storilcem kaznivih dejanj, čeprav sodniki niso zavezani upoštevati te obteževalne okoliščine pri izrekanju sankcije.
Member States are not obliged to provide for the aggravating circumstance where national law provides for the criminal offences as defined in Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA to be punishable as a separate criminal offence and this may lead to more severe sanctions.
Države članice niso zavezane določiti te obteževalne okoliščine, če so kazniva dejanja, kot so opredeljena v Okvirnem sklepu 2008/841/PNZ, v nacionalnem pravu opredeljena kot ločena kazniva dejanja, ki lahko privedejo do strožjih sankcij.
Given, in particular, the mobility of perpetrators and of the proceeds stemming from illegal activities at the expense of the Union's financial interests, as well as the complex cross-border investigations which this entails, each Member State should establish its jurisdiction in order to enable it to counter such activities.
Predvsem glede na mobilnost storilcev in premoženjskih koristi, ki izvirajo iz protipravnih ravnanj v škodo finančnih interesov Unije, ter zaradi zapletenih čezmejnih preiskav, ki so posledica tega, bi se morala vsaka država članica izreči za pristojno, da bi lahko ukrepala proti tem ravnanjem.
Each Member State should thereby ensure that its jurisdiction covers criminal offences which are committed using information and communication technology accessed from its territory.
Vsaka država članica bi morala zagotoviti, da v njeno pristojnost spadajo kazniva dejanja, ki so storjena z uporabo informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij z dostopom z njenega ozemlja.
Given the possibility of multiple jurisdictions for cross-border criminal offences falling under the scope of this Directive, the Member States should ensure that the principle of ne bis in idem is respected in full in the application of national law transposing this Directive.
Glede na možnost, da je za čezmejna kazniva dejanja, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te direktive, pristojnih več sodišč, bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da se pri uporabi nacionalnega prava za prenos te direktive v celoti spoštuje načelo ne bis in idem.
Member States should lay down rules concerning limitation periods necessary in order to enable them to counter illegal activities at the expense of the Union's financial interests.
Države članice bi morale določiti pravila o zastaralnih rokih, ki so potrebna, da lahko ukrepajo zoper protipravna ravnanja v škodo finančnih interesov Unije.
In cases of criminal offences punishable by a maximum sanction of at least four years of imprisonment, the limitation period should be at least five years from the time when the criminal offence was committed.
Pri kaznivih dejanjih, ki se kaznujejo z najvišjo predpisano sankcijo najmanj štirih let zapora, bi moral biti zastaralni rok najmanj pet let od storitve kaznivega dejanja.
This should be without prejudice to those Member States which do not set limitation periods for investigation, prosecution and enforcement.
To ne bi smelo posegati v države članice, ki nimajo zastaralnih rokov za preiskavo, kazenski pregon in izvrševanje kazni.