natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where, following a judgment of the Court, the prosecution has to decide whether to lodge an appeal, the European Delegated Prosecutor shall submit a report including a draft decision to the competent Permanent Chamber and await its instructions.
Pregon pred nacionalnimi sodišči
Should it be impossible to await those instructions within the deadline set by national law, the European Delegated Prosecutor shall be entitled to lodge the appeal without prior instructions from the Permanent Chamber, and shall subsequently submit the report to the Permanent Chamber without delay.
Ko evropski delegirani tožilec predloži osnutek sklepa, v katerem predlaga vložitev obtožnice, stalni senat po postopkih iz člena 35 odloči o tem osnutku v roku 21 dni.
The Permanent Chamber shall then instruct the European Delegated Prosecutor either to maintain or withdraw the appeal.
Stalni senat ne more odločiti, da opusti zadevo, če se v osnutku sklepa predlaga vložitev obtožnice.
The same procedure shall apply when, in the course of the court proceedings and in accordance with applicable national law, the handling European Delegated Prosecutor would take a position that would lead to the dismissal of the case.
Kadar stalni senat ne odloči v roku 21 dni, se šteje, da je sklep, ki ga je predlagal evropski delegirani tožilec, sprejet.
Article 37
Kadar ima pristojnost za zadevo več kot ena država članica, se stalni senat načeloma odloči začeti pregon v tej zadevi v državi članici evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo.
Evidence
Vendar se lahko stalni senat ob upoštevanju poročila, predloženega v skladu s členom 35(1), odloči začeti pregon v drugi državi članici, če ima za to dovolj upravičene razloge, pri čemer upošteva merila iz člena 26(4) in (5), ter za to ustrezno pooblasti evropskega delegiranega tožilca navedene države članice.
Evidence presented by the prosecutors of the EPPO or the defendant to a court shall not be denied admission on the mere ground that the evidence was gathered in another Member State or in accordance with the law of another Member State.
Pred odločitvijo o vložitvi obtožnice se lahko pristojni stalni senat na predlog evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo, odloči za združitev več zadev proti isti osebi ali osebam, ki jih preiskujejo različni evropski delegirani tožilci, z namenom izvedbe pregona v teh zadevah pred sodišči ene same države članice, ki ima v skladu s svojim pravom pristojnost za vsako od teh zadev.
The power of the trial court to freely assess the evidence presented by the defendant or the prosecutors of the EPPO shall not be affected by this Regulation.
Ko je sprejeta odločitev o državi članici, v kateri bo začet pregon, se pristojno nacionalno sodišče v tej državi članici določi na podlagi nacionalnega prava.
Article 38
Glavni urad o odločitvi za pregon uradno obvesti pristojne nacionalne organe, zainteresirane osebe ter ustrezne institucije, organe, urade in agencije Unije, kadar je to potrebno zaradi izterjave, nadaljnjih upravnih ukrepov ali spremljanja.
Disposition of confiscated assets
Če mora tožilstvo po sodbi sodišča sprejeti odločitev o tem, ali naj vloži pritožbo, evropski delegirani tožilec predloži poročilo, vključno z osnutkom odločitve, pristojnemu stalnemu senatu in počaka na njegova navodila.
Where, in accordance with the requirements and procedures under national law including the national law transposing Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [22], the competent national court has decided by a final ruling to confiscate any property related to, or proceeds derived from, an offence within the competence of the EPPO, such assets or proceeds shall be disposed of in accordance with applicable national law.
Če v roku, ki ga določa nacionalno pravo, ni mogoče dočakati teh navodil, lahko evropski delegirani tožilec vloži pritožbo brez predhodnih navodil stalnega senata in nato stalnemu senatu brez odlašanja predloži poročilo.
This disposition shall not negatively affect the rights of the Union or other victims to be compensated for damage that they have incurred.SECTION 4
Stalni senat nato naroči evropskemu delegiranemu tožilcu, naj bodisi vztraja pri pritožbi ali jo umakne.
Rules on alternatives to prosecution
Enak postopek se uporabi, če bi med sodnim postopkom in v skladu z veljavnim nacionalnim pravom evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, zavzel stališče, ki bi povzročilo opustitev zadeve.
Article 39
Člen 37
Dismissal of the case
Dokazi
Where prosecution has become impossible, pursuant to the law of the Member State of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor, the Permanent Chamber shall, based on a report provided by the European Delegated Prosecutor handling the case in accordance with Article 35(1), decide to dismiss the case against a person on account of any of the following grounds:
Dokazi, ki jih sodišču predložijo tožilci EJT ali obtoženec, se ne smejo zavrniti kot nedopustni le zato, ker so bili zbrani v drugi državi članici ali v skladu s pravom druge države članice.
the death of the suspect or accused person or winding up of a suspect or accused legal person;
Ta uredba ne vpliva na pristojnost sodišča prve stopnje, da prosto oceni dokaze, ki jih predložijo obtoženec ali tožilci EJT.
the insanity of the suspect or accused person;
Člen 38
amnesty granted to the suspect or accused person;
Razpolaganje z zaseženimi sredstvi
immunity granted to the suspect or accused person, unless it has been lifted;
Če pristojno nacionalno sodišče v skladu z zahtevami in postopki po nacionalnem pravu, vključno z nacionalnim pravom o prenosu Direktive 2014/42/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [22], dokončno odloči, da se zaseže kakršno koli premoženje, povezano s kaznivim dejanjem, ali premoženjska korist, pridobljena s kaznivim dejanjem, ki sodi v pristojnost EJT, se s takimi sredstva ali premoženjsko koristjo razpolaga v skladu z veljavnim nacionalnim pravom.
expiry of the national statutory limitation to prosecute;
Takšno razpolaganje nima negativnega vpliva na pravice Unije ali drugih žrtev do nadomestila za škodo, ki so jo utrpeli.ODDELEK 4
the suspect’s or accused person’s case has already been finally disposed of in relation to the same acts;
Pravila o alternativnih ukrepih namesto pregona
the lack of relevant evidence.
Člen 39
A decision in accordance with paragraph 1 shall not bar further investigations on the basis of new facts which were not known to the EPPO at the time of the decision and which become known after the decision.
Opustitev zadeve
The decision to reopen investigations on the basis of such new facts shall be taken by the competent Permanent Chamber.
Kadar pregon na podlagi prava države članice evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo, postane nemogoč, stalni senat na podlagi poročila, ki ga evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, predloži v skladu s členom 35(1), sklene opustiti zadevo, ki se vodi glede določene osebe, iz katerega koli od naslednjih razlogov:
Where the EPPO is competent in accordance with Article 22(3), it shall dismiss a case only after consultation with the national authorities of the Member State referred to in Article 25(6).
smrt osumljenca ali obdolženca oziroma prenehanje osumljene ali obdolžene pravne osebe;
If applicable, the Permanent Chamber shall refer the case to the competent national authorities in accordance with Article 34(6), (7) and (8).
neprištevnost osumljenca ali obdolženca;
The same applies where the EPPO exercises a competence in respect of offences referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 3(2) of Directive (EU) 2017/1371 and where the damage caused or likely to be caused to the Union’s financial interests does not exceed the damage caused or likely to be caused to another victim.
pomilostitev, izrečena osumljencu ali obdolžencu;
Where a case has been dismissed, the EPPO shall officially notify the competent national authorities and shall inform the relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, as well as, where appropriate under national law, the suspects or accused persons and the crime victims, of such dismissal.
imuniteta, priznana osumljencu ali obdolžencu, razen če je bila preklicana;
The dismissed cases may also be referred to OLAF or to the competent national administrative or judicial authorities for recovery or other administrative follow-up.
potek zakonsko določenega zastaralnega roka za pregon;
SECTION 5
zadeva, ki se vodi glede osumljenca ali obdolženca, je bila v zvezi z istimi dejanji že dokončno zaključena;
Rules on simplified procedures
pomanjkanje ustreznih dokazov.
Article 40
Odločitev v skladu z odstavkom 1 ne preprečuje nadaljnjih preiskav na podlagi novih dejstev, ki jih EJT v času odločitve ni poznalo in ki so postala poznana po odločitvi.
Simplified prosecution procedures
Odločitev o ponovni uvedbi preiskav na podlagi takšnih novih dejstev sprejme pristojni stalni senat.
If the applicable national law provides for a simplified prosecution procedure aiming at the final disposal of a case on the basis of terms agreed with the suspect, the handling European Delegated Prosecutor may, in accordance with Article 10(3) and Article 35(1), propose to the competent Permanent Chamber to apply that procedure in accordance with the conditions provided for in national law.
Če je EJT pristojno v skladu s členom 22(3), zadevo opusti šele po posvetovanju z nacionalnimi organi države članice iz člena 25(6).
Where the EPPO exercises a competence in respect of offences referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 3(2) of Directive (EU) 2017/1371 and where the damage caused or likely to be caused to the Union’s financial interest does not exceed the damage caused or likely to be caused to another victim, the handling European Delegated Prosecutor shall consult national prosecution authorities before proposing to apply a simplified prosecution procedure.
Če je primerno, stalni senat odstopi zadevo pristojnim nacionalnim organom v skladu s členom 34(6), (7) in (8).
The Permanent Chamber shall decide on the proposal of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor taking into account the following grounds:
Enako velja v primerih, kadar EJT izvaja pristojnost v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji iz točk (a) in (b) člena 3(2) Direktive (EU) 2017/1371 in kadar škoda, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena finančnim interesom Unije, ne presega škode, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena drugi žrtvi.
the seriousness of the offence, based on in particular the damage caused;
Če se zadeva opusti, EJT o takšni opustitvi uradno obvesti pristojne nacionalne organe in to sporoči ustreznim institucijam, organom, uradom in agencijam Unije ter, kjer je potrebno v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, osumljencem ali obdolžencem in žrtvam.
the willingness of the suspected offender to repair the damage caused by the illegal conduct;
Zadeve, ki jih opusti, lahko odstopi tudi uradu OLAF ali pristojnim nacionalnim upravnim oziroma sodnim organom zaradi izterjave ali drugih upravnih ukrepov.
the use of the procedure would be in accordance with the general objectives and basic principles of the EPPO as set out in this Regulation.
ODDELEK 5
The College shall, in accordance with Article 9(2), adopt guidelines on the application of those grounds.
Pravila o poenostavljenih postopkih
If the Permanent Chamber agrees with the proposal, the handling European Delegated Prosecutor shall apply the simplified prosecution procedure in accordance with the conditions provided for in national law and register it in the case management system.
Člen 40
When the simplified prosecution procedure has been finalised upon fulfilment of the terms agreed with the suspect, the Permanent Chamber shall instruct the European Delegated Prosecutor to act with a view to finally dispose of the case.
Poenostavljeni postopki pregona
CHAPTER VI
Če je z veljavnim nacionalnim pravom določen poenostavljen postopek pregona, katerega cilj je dokončen zaključek zadeve na podlagi pogojev, dogovorjenih z osumljencem, lahko evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, v skladu s členom 10(3) in členom 35(1) pristojnemu stalnemu senatu predlaga, da se uporabi navedeni postopek v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu.
PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS
Kadar EJT izvaja pristojnost za kazniva dejanja iz točk (a) in (b) člena 3(2) Direktive (EU) 2017/1371 in kadar škoda, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena finančnim interesom Unije, ne presega škode, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena drugi žrtvi, se evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, posvetuje z nacionalnimi organi pregona, preden predlaga uporabo poenostavljenega postopka pregona.
Article 41
Stalni senat odloča o predlogu evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo, ob upoštevanju naslednjih razlogov:
Scope of the rights of the suspects and accused persons
teža kaznivega dejanja, zlasti na podlagi povzročene škode;
The activities of the EPPO shall be carried out in full compliance with the rights of suspects and accused persons enshrined in the Charter, including the right to a fair trial and the rights of defence.
pripravljenost domnevnega storilca kaznivega dejanja za odpravo škode, ki jo povzroči nezakonito ravnanje;
Any suspected or accused person in the criminal proceedings of the EPPO shall, at aa minimum, have the procedural rights provided for in Union law, including directives concerning the rights of suspects and accused persons in criminal procedures, as implemented by national law, such as:
uporaba postopka bi bila v skladu s splošnimi cilji in temeljnimi načeli EJT, kot so določeni v tej uredbi.
the right to interpretation and translation, as provided for in Directive 2010/64/EU;
Kolegij v skladu s členom 9(2) sprejme smernice o uporabi teh razlogov.
the right to information and access to the case materials, as provided for in Directive 2012/13/EU;
Če se stalni senat strinja s predlogom, evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, uporabi poenostavljeni postopek pregona v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu, in ga evidentira v sistemu vodenja zadev.
the right of access to a lawyer and the right to communicate with and have third persons informed in the event of detention, as provided for in Directive 2013/48/EU;
Ko se po izpolnitvi pogojev, dogovorjenih z osumljencem, poenostavljeni postopek pregona konča, stalni senat naloži evropskemu delegiranemu tožilcu, naj ukrepa z namenom dokončnega zaključka zadeve.
the right to remain silent and the right to be presumed innocent as provided for in Directive (EU) 2016/343;
POGLAVJE VI
the right to legal aid as provided for in Directive (EU) 2016/1919.
PROCESNA JAMSTVA
Without prejudice to the rights referred to in this Chapter, suspects and accused persons as well as other persons involved in the proceedings of the EPPO shall have all the procedural rights available to them under the applicable national law, including the possibility to present evidence, to request the appointment of experts or expert examination and hearing of witnesses, and to request the EPPO to obtain such measures on behalf of the defence.
Člen 41
Article 42
Obseg pravic osumljencev in obdolžencev
Judicial review
Dejavnosti EJT se izvajajo ob polnem upoštevanju pravic osumljencev in obdolžencev, vsebovanih v Listini, vključno s pravico do poštenega sojenja in pravico do obrambe.
Procedural acts of the EPPO that are intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties shall be subject to review by the competent national courts in accordance with the requirements and procedures laid down by national law.
Vsak osumljenec ali obdolženec v kazenskem postopku EJT ima najmanj naslednje procesne pravice, določene v pravu Unije, med drugim v direktivah o pravicah osumljencev in obdolžencev v kazenskih postopkih, kakor se izvajajo z nacionalnim pravom, na primer:
The same applies to failures of the EPPO to adopt procedural acts which are intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties and which it was legally required to adopt under this Regulation.
pravico do tolmačenja in prevajanja, kot je določena v Direktivi 2010/64/EU;
The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction, in accordance with Article 267 TFEU, to give preliminary rulings concerning:
pravico do obveščenosti in dostopa do gradiva v zadevi, kot je določena v Direktivi 2012/13/EU;
the validity of procedural acts of the EPPO, in so far as such a question of validity is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State directly on the basis of Union law;
pravico do dostopa do odvetnika in pravico do komunikacije s tretjimi osebami in njihove obveščenosti v primeru pridržanja, kot je določena v Direktivi 2013/48/EU;
the interpretation or the validity of provisions of Union law, including this Regulation;
pravico do molka in pravico do domneve nedolžnosti, kot sta določeni v Direktivi (EU) 2016/343;
the interpretation of Articles 22 and 25 of this Regulation in relation to any conflict of competence between the EPPO and the competent national authorities.
pravico do pravne pomoči, kot je določena v Direktivi (EU) 2016/1919.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, the decisions of the EPPO to dismiss a case, in so far as they are contested directly on the basis of Union law, shall be subject to review before the Court of Justice in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU.
Brez poseganja v pravice iz tega poglavja imajo osumljenci in obdolženci ter vse druge osebe, vključene v postopke EJT, vse procesne pravice, ki so jim priznane v skladu z veljavnim nacionalnim pravom, vključno z možnostjo, da predložijo dokaze, zahtevajo postavitev izvedencev oziroma pridobitev izvedenskega mnenja in zaslišanje prič ter da EJT pozovejo, da takšne ukrepe pridobi v imenu obrambe.
The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in accordance with Article 268 TFEU in any dispute relating to compensation for damage caused by the EPPO.
Člen 42
The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in accordance with Article 272 TFEU in any dispute concerning arbitration clauses contained in contracts concluded by the EPPO.
Sodni nadzor
The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in accordance with Article 270 TFEU in any dispute concerning staff-related matters.
Postopkovne akte EJT, ki naj bi imeli pravne učinke v razmerju do tretjih, presojajo pristojna nacionalna sodišča v skladu z zahtevami in postopki, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu.
The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction on the dismissal of the European Chief Prosecutor or European Prosecutors, in accordance, respectively, with Article 14(5) and Article 16(5).
Enako velja, če EJT ne sprejme postopkovnih aktov, ki naj bi imeli pravne učinke v razmerju do tretjih, če jih je bilo ETJ pravno zavezano sprejeti na podlagi te uredbe.
This Article is without prejudice to judicial review by the Court of Justice in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU of decisions of the EPPO that affect the data subjects’ rights under Chapter VIII and of decisions of the EPPO which are not procedural acts, such as decisions of the EPPO concerning the right of public access to documents, or decisions dismissing European Delegated Prosecutors adopted pursuant to Article 17(3) of this Regulation, or any other administrative decisions.
Sodišče je v skladu s členom 267 PDEU pristojno za predhodno odločanje o vprašanjih glede:
CHAPTER VII
veljavnosti postopkovnih aktov EJT, v kolikor se takšno vprašanje veljavnosti postavi kateremu koli sodišču države članice neposredno na podlagi prava Unije;
PROCESSING OF INFORMATION
razlage ali veljavnosti določb prava Unije, vključno s to uredbo;
Article 43
razlage členov 22 in 25 te uredbe v zvezi s kakršnim koli sporom o pristojnosti med EJT in pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi.
Access to information by the EPPO
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 tega člena odločitve EJT o opustitvi zadeve, če se izpodbijajo neposredno na podlagi prava Unije, presoja Sodišče Evropske unije v skladu s četrtim odstavkom člena 263 PDEU.
European Delegated Prosecutors shall be able to obtain any relevant information stored in national criminal investigation and law enforcement databases, as well as other relevant registers of public authorities, under the same conditions as those that apply under national law in similar cases.
Sodišče je v skladu s členom 268 PDEU pristojno v vseh sporih glede nadomestila škode, ki jo povzroči EJT.
The EPPO shall also be able to obtain any relevant information falling within its competence that is stored in databases and registers of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union.
Sodišče je v skladu s členom 272 PDEU pristojno v vseh sporih glede arbitražnih klavzul v pogodbah, ki jih sklene EJT.
Article 44
Sodišče je v skladu s členom 270 PDEU pristojno v vseh sporih glede vprašanj, povezanih z osebjem.
Case management system
Sodišče je pristojno za razrešitev evropskega glavnega tožilca v skladu s členom 14(5) ali evropskih tožilcev v skladu s členom 16(5).
The EPPO shall establish a case management system, which shall be held and managed in accordance with the rules established in this Regulation and in the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO.
Ta člen ne posega v sodni nadzor, ki ga izvaja Sodišča v skladu s četrtim odstavkom člena 263 PDEU glede odločitev EJT, ki vplivajo na pravice oseb, na katere se nanašajo podatki, na podlagi poglavja VIII, ter odločitev EJT, ki niso postopkovni akti, na primer odločitev EJT v zvezi s pravico javnega dostopa do dokumentov, ali odločitev o razrešitvi evropskih delegiranih tožilcev, sprejetih v skladu s členom 17(3) te uredbe, ter katerih koli drugih upravnih odločitev.
The purpose of the case management system shall be to:
POGLAVJE VII
support the management of investigations and prosecutions conducted by the EPPO, in particular by managing internal information workflows and by supporting investigative work in cross-border cases;
OBDELAVA INFORMACIJ
ensure secure access to information on investigations and prosecutions at the Central Office and by the European Delegated Prosecutors;
Člen 43
allow for the cross-referencing of information and the extraction of data for operational analysis and statistical purposes;
Dostop EJT do informacij
facilitate monitoring to ensure that the processing of operational personal data is lawful and complies with the relevant provisions of this Regulation.
1.
The case management system may be linked to the secure telecommunications connection referred to in Article 9 of Council Decision 2008/976/JHA [23].
Evropski delegirani tožilci lahko pod pogoji, ki so enaki tistim, ki veljajo po nacionalnem pravu v podobnih zadevah, pridobijo vse ustrezne informacije, shranjene v nacionalnih podatkovnih zbirkah o kazenskih preiskavah in zbirkah organov odkrivanja in pregona, pa tudi v drugih ustreznih registrih javnih organov.
The case management system shall contain:
EJT lahko pridobi tudi vse ustrezne informacije, ki sodijo v njegovo pristojnost in so shranjene v podatkovnih zbirkah in registrih institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije.
a register of information obtained by the EPPO in accordance with Article 24, including any decisions in relation to that information,
Člen 44
an index of all case files;
Sistem vodenja zadev
all information from the case files stored electronically in the case management system in accordance with Article 45(3).
EJT vzpostavi sistem vodenja zadev, ki se vodi in upravlja v skladu s pravili iz te uredbe in poslovnika EJT.
The index shall not contain any operational personal data other than data needed to identify cases or establish cross-links between different case files.
Namen sistema vodenja zadev je:
For the processing of operational personal data, the EPPO may only establish automated data files other than case files in accordance with this Regulation and with the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO.
podpreti EJT pri vodenju preiskav in pregona, zlasti z upravljanjem notranjega poteka dela z informacijami in s podporo preiskovalnemu delu v čezmejnih primerih;
Details on such other automated data files shall be notified to the European Data Protection Supervisor.
v glavnem uradu in evropskim delegiranim tožilcem zagotoviti zanesljiv dostop do informacij o preiskavah in pregonu;