natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this respect, the Commission referred, inter alia, to recitals (157), (159) and (198) of the provisional Regulation stating that ‘while the Union industry was recovering during 2014 and the first two quarters of 2015, almost all injury indicators started to fall dramatically during the second half of 2015.
Za uvoženi zadevni izdelek, ki ga proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki ni posebej navedena v izvedbenem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, se te stopnje ne bi smele uporabljati, zanj pa bi morala veljati stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
The investigation revealed that this negative trend, which started in the second half of 2015, was not invalidated during the first half of 2016.’
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj protidampinških dajatev za posamezne družbe (na primer zaradi spremembe imena subjekta ali ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba nasloviti na Komisijo [24], vključno z vsemi ustreznimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje, domače prodaje in izvoza, povezanimi na primer z navedeno spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
Second, as to the substance of the matter, the Commission established that, as laid out in recital (157) of the provisional Regulation, the negative trend started in the second half of 2015 and led to a clearly foreseeable and imminent change in circumstances at the end of the investigation period, which would create a situation in which the dumping would cause injury, if no measures were taken.
Komisija je priznala te spremembe imen in ustrezno prilagodila člen 1(2).
This is in line with what was stated by the Commission in recital (113) of the provisional Regulation that ‘the Union producers could partly recover during 2014 and the first half of 2015’.
Da bi se zmanjšalo tveganje izogibanja, se šteje, da so v tem primeru potrebni posebni ukrepi za zagotovitev pravilne uporabe protidampinških ukrepov.
As a result, the second half of 2015 better reflects the actual impact of the threat of injury to the Union industry that should be removed.
Ti posebni ukrepi vključujejo predložitev veljavnega trgovinskega računa carinskim organom držav članic, ki je skladen z zahtevami iz člena 1(3) te uredbe.
Third, the Court held that the analysis of post-investigation period data is particularly appropriate in an investigation to determine whether there is a threat-of-injury which, by its very nature, requires a prospective analysis.
Za uvoz, ki ga ne spremlja tak račun, velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za vse druge družbe.
For the Commission, the second half of 2015 seems to better respond to this requirement, as it is closer to future developments than the full IP.
Sprostitev začasnih dajatev
Fourth, a calculation on the basis of a full investigation period, irrespective whether there were signs of negative trends, would undermine the objective of a threat of injury-case to act effectively and preventively before the threat of injury has caused injury.
Ena zainteresirana stran je po dokončnem razkritju trdila, da Komisija ne more dokončno pobirati začasnih dajatev v skladu s členom 10(2)osnovne uredbe, razen če se dokaže, da bi brez začasnih ukrepov nastala znatna škoda še pred sprejetjem dokončnih ukrepov.
For all the reasons above, the Commission accepted the view that the period for calculating the injury margins in this particular case should be based on the second half of 2015 and not on the entire investigation period.
Komisija ob upoštevanju ugotovitev v okviru obravnavanega primera meni, da bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 10(2) osnovne uredbe sprostiti vse zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, ki je bila uvedena z začasno uredbo.
As a result, the Commission requested additional data to cooperating producers.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 –
It received additional quarterly IP data on the cost of production per product type from the sampled Union producers and verified these data afterwards.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The verifications concerned solely the additional data provided which were not requested before and ensured that the data on which the Commission eventually based its findings were reliable.
Člen 1
As the level of cooperation was considered high, the definitive injury margin for the PRC, applicable to non-sampled cooperating exporting producers, was calculated as the average of the three sampled exporting producers/groups of companies.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz nekaterih ploščato valjanih izdelkov iz železa, nelegiranega jekla ali drugega legiranega jekla, v kolobarjih ali ne (vključno z „razrezanimi izdelki“ in „ozkimi trakovi“), vroče valjane, brez nadaljnje obdelave, neplatirane, neprevlečene in neprekrite s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The definitive injury margin for the PRC, applicable to non-cooperating exporting producers, was established at the level of the highest margin of the three cooperating companies/groups of companies.
Zadevni izdelek se trenutno uvršča pod oznake KN 72081000, 72082500, 72082600, 72082700, 72083600, 72083700, 72083800, 72083900, 72084000, 72085210, 72085299, 72085310, 72085390, 72085400, 72111300, 72111400, 72111900, ex72251910 (oznaka TARIC 7225191090), 72253090, ex72254060 (oznaka TARIC 7225406090), 72254090, ex72261910 (oznaka TARIC 7226191090), 72269191 in 72269199.
Following definitive disclosure, CISA commented that the full IP was used as a basis to calculate the Union industry target's unit price, whereas only 6 months of the IP was used to calculate the Union free circulation unit sales price of the Chinese exporting producers, belonging to the Shagang group.
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatev za izdelek iz odstavka 1, ki ga proizvajajo naslednje družbe, je:
After analysis, this comment was found to be accurate.
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
The Commission therefore recalculated the Union industry's target unit price for the Chinese exporting producers, belonging to the Shagang group, using as such the cost of production-data for the same period (second half of 2015) as the period used for the calculation of the Union free circulation unit sales price of all Chinese exporting producers.
Handan Iron & Steel Group Han-Bao Co., Ltd.
The revised calculation led to the finding that the injury margins for the companies belonging to the Shagang Group went down from 36,6 % to 35,9 %
Hesteel Co., Ltd.
Furthermore, the Commission reviewed the initial calculations of the injury margins for the two other Chinese exporting producers.
Tangshan Branch [25]
Whereas the initial calculation for the Hebei-group was assessed to be correct, the review of the initial calculation for Bengang Steel Plates Co., Ltd showed that it contained the following clerical errors:
Hesteel Co., Ltd.
One product type was found to be wrongly excluded from the initial calculation.
Chengde Branch [26]
As a result, the revised calculation included this product type since this product type was both sold by the Union producers and by Bengang Steel Plates Co., Ltd.
Zhangjiagang Hongchang Plate Co., Ltd.
A few values in the data of the Union industry had been wrongly linked in the calculation sheet.
Zhangjiagang GTA Plate Co., Ltd.
As a result of the abovementioned effects, the injury margin for this Chinese exporting producer increased to 28,1 % (instead of 25,5 %).
Druge sodelujoče družbe iz Priloge I
The revised calculation of the Union industry's target unit price was communicated to both the Shagang group and Bengang Steel Plates Co., Ltd on 16 January 2017.
Glej prilogo.
Since the only element which changed compared to the Commission's definitive disclosure dated 22 December 2016 was the Union industry's target price, both interested parties were asked to comment concerning these limited additional disclosures by 18 January 2017.
Pogoj za uporabo individualnih stopenj protidampinške dajatve, določenih za družbe iz odstavka 2, je predložitev veljavnega trgovinskega računa carinskim organom držav članic, ki vsebuje izjavo z datumom in podpisom uradnika subjekta, ki izdaja take račune, ter njegovim imenom in funkcijo, pri čemer je navedeno: „Podpisani potrjujem, da je (količina) vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz jekla, prodanih za izvoz v Evropsko unijo, ki jih zajema ta račun, proizvedla (ime in naslov družbe) (dodatna oznaka TARIC) v (zadevna država).
Following definitive disclosure, one Chinese exporting producer also commented that it was not persuaded by the reasons given that using only data covering the second half of 2015 would reflect more properly the situation of the impact of the threat.
Če ni določeno drugače, se uporabljajo veljavni carinski predpisi.
It also alleged that any selective use of the period for the purpose of the injury margin calculation would make the comparison of the dumping and injury margins for the purpose of the ‘lesser-duty rule’ illogic and distortive, and leading to higher margins than in case the full year of 2015 would have been used.
Kadar novi proizvajalec izvoznik v Ljudski republiki Kitajski Komisiji zagotovi zadostne dokaze, da:
Consequently, it requested the Commission to use a period of 12 months to calculate the injury margin, similar to the period used to calculate the dumping margins.
v obdobju od 1. januarja 2015 do 31. decembra 2015 („obdobje preiskave“) v Unijo ni izvažal izdelka iz odstavka 1,
Similar comments were received from the Italian user, who added that the selective use of information relating to part of the IP does not allow for an objective assessment of the injury elimination level in the present case.
ni povezan z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, za katerega veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni s to uredbo,
A similar comment was received by CISA and by two Chinese exporting producers, both alleging that the choice of a six months' period is a breach of legal certainty and legitimate expectations.
je zadevni izdelek dejansko izvažal v Unijo po obdobju preiskave, na kateri temeljijo ukrepi, ali da je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost, da izvozi znatno količino v Unijo,
In this respect, whereas the other Chinese exporting producer alleged mainly that limiting the data set to a mere six months period cannot qualify as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation, CISA referred to point 5.1 of the Notice of Initiation stating that ‘the investigation of dumping and injury will cover the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 and the case-law’.
se odstavek 2 lahko spremeni tako, da se na seznam sodelujočih družb, ki niso vključene v vzorec in za katere velja individualna stopnja dajatev, ki ne presega tehtane povprečne stopnje dajatve v višini 27,3 %, doda nov proizvajalec izvoznik.
Moreover, one Chinese exporting producer also mentioned that it is the Commission's established practice to refrain from using data referring to only part of the investigation period and that the methodology applied in this case is not in line with the WTO Anti-Dumping Committee's recommendation that ‘the period of data collection…should include the entirety of the period of data collection for the dumping investigation.’
Člen 2
The Commission rejected all these arguments as follows.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasnimi protidampinškimi dajatvami v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2016/181 [27], se dokončno sprostijo.Člen 3
First, the determination of dumping and injury is made on the basis of an investigation period and a period considered defined in line with the relevant provisions of the basic Regulation and announced in the Notice of Initiation.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
On the other hand, the basic Regulation does not provide any specific method for the calculation of the injury margin used for the application of the lesser-duty rule.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
Second, the basic regulation also does not provide specific criteria for the definition of the period during which the parameters for the calculation of the injury margin are assessed.
V Bruslju, 5. aprila 2017
In the present case, the Commission considered that the period chosen reflects the specificity of the case and is appropriate in the context of a prospective analysis.
Za Komisijo
Moreover, the Commission used for the injury margin calculation the same 6-months period for comparing the export price and the target price to ensure an objective assessment.
Predsednik
Taking into account the issues mentioned above in recitals (135) to (163) above, and absent any other comments, the definitive injury margins were recalculated using the data for the second half of 2015.
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
These definitive margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1778 z dne 6. oktobra 2016 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz železa, nelegiranega jekla ali drugega legiranega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 272, 7.10.2016, str. 33).
Also shown here are definitive duty rates.
UL C 58, 13.2.2016, str. 9.
Table 7
Obvestilo o začetku protisubvencijskega postopka v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz železa, nelegiranega jekla ali drugega legiranega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL C 172, 13.5.2016, str. 29).
Definitive Margins and Duty Rates
Obvestilo o začetku protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih vroče valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz železa, nelegiranega jekla ali drugega legiranega jekla s poreklom iz Brazilije, Irana, Rusije, Srbije in Ukrajine (UL C 246/8, 7.7.2016, str. 7).
Definitive injury margin
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/865 z dne 31. maja 2016 o začetku preiskave glede morebitnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/2384 na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, z uvozom nekoliko spremenjenih nekaterih aluminijastih folij iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, in o uvedbi registracije takega uvoza (UL L 144, 1.6.2016, str. 35).
Definitive duty rate
Postopki v zvezi z izvajanjem skupne trgovinske politike, Evropska komisija, Obvestilo o začetku protidampinškega postopka za uvoz nekaterih jekel, odpornih proti koroziji, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL C 459, 9.12.2016, str. 17).
The abovementioned injury margins were rounded down, where appropriate, to the nearest tenth of a digit following comments from an exporting producer after the definitive disclosure.
UL L 23, 29.1.2016, str. 16.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
UL L 210, 4.8.2016, str. 1.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during this investigation with respect to these companies.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1329 z dne 29. julija 2016 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na registrirani uvoz nekaterih hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Ruske federacije (UL L 210, 4.8.2016, str. 27).
These duty rates (as opposed to the country-wide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of product concerned originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu svetu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru, Odboru regij in Evropski investicijski banki, Bruselj, 16. marec 2016.
Imported product concerned produced by any other company whose name is not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, should not benefit from these rates and should be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
COM(2016) 155 final, Jeklarska industrija: ohranjanje trajnostnih delovnih mest in rasti v Evropi.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (for example following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting-up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [24] with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vir podatkov o zmogljivosti: OECD (OECD, DSTI/SU/SC(2016)6/Final, 5. september 2016 Direktorat za znanost, tehnologijo in inovacije, Posodobljeni podatki o proizvodni zmogljivosti v jeklarstvu in predlagani okvir za okrepitev spremljanja zmogljivosti (Updated steelmaking capacity figures and a proposed framework for enhancing capacity monitoring activity), Priloga, str.
If appropriate, the present Regulation will be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
7 in naslednje).
‘Hebei Iron & Steel Group Co., Ltd’ changed its name to ‘Hesteel Group Co., Ltd’ during the investigation.
Vir podatkov o proizvodnji: Svetovno jeklarsko združenje, Steel Statistical Yearbook 2015 (Svetovno jeklarsko združenje (World Steel Association), Steel Statistical Yearbook 2016, tabela 1 na straneh 1 in 2 ter tabela 13 na strani 35, http://www.worldsteel.org/statistics/statistics-archive/yearbook-archive.html).
Some of its related companies have also changed their names.
Poročilo Odbora OECD za jeklo z dne 8. in 9. septembra 2016 z naslovom Posodobljeni podatki o proizvodni zmogljivosti v jeklarstvu in predlagani okvir za okrepitev dejavnosti spremljanja zmogljivosti (Updated steelmaking capacity figures and a proposed framework for enhancing capacity monitoring activity).
The Commission duly acknowledged these name changes and adapted Article 1 paragraph 2 accordingly.
Richard Lu, 15. julij 2016, Negativna stran scenarija kitajskega povpraševanja po jeklu: umazane podrobnosti (The downside Chinese steel demand scenario: gory details), http://www.crugroup.com/about-cru/cruinsight/The_downside_Chinese_steel_demand_scenario_gory_details.
In order to minimise the risks of circumvention, it is considered that special measures are needed in this case to ensure the proper application of the anti-dumping measures.
Povzetek mesečne posodobitve združenja Worldsteel o kitajski jeklarski industriji, oktober 2016.
These special measures include the following: the presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice which shall conform to the requirements set out in Article 1(3) of this Regulation.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 926/2009 z dne 24. septembra 2009 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 262, 6.10.2009, str.
Imports not accompanied by such an invoice shall be made subject to the duty rate applicable to all other companies.
19).
Release of the provisional duties
Sodba Sodišča z dne 7. aprila 2016 v zadevi C-186/14, uvodna izjava 72, s katero je bila potrjena sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 29. januarja 2014 v zadevi T-528/09, Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co.
Following definitive disclosure, one interested party claimed that the Commission cannot definitively collect the provisional duties pursuant to Article 10(2) of the basic Regulation unless it is demonstrated that in the absence of provisional measures, the situation would have developed into material injury before the adoption of definitive measures.
Ltd proti Svetu Evropske unije, uvodna izjava 71.
In light of the findings in the present case, the Commission considers that, pursuant to Article 10(2) of the basic Regulation, the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty, imposed by the provisional Regulation, should be released.
UL L 107, 19.4.2012, str. 5.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
Tako se je mogoče sklicevati na naslednja primera:Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 217/2013 z dne 11. marca 2013 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij v zvitkih s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 69, 13.3.2013, str. 11),Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1953 z dne 29. oktobra 2015 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih zrnato usmerjenih ploščato valjanih izdelkov iz silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Japonske, Republike Koreje, Ruske federacije in Združenih držav Amerike (UL L 284, 30.10.2015, str. 109).
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Prej „Hebei Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.
Article 1
Tangshan Branch“.
A definitive anti-dumping duty is imposed on imports of imports of certain flat-rolled products of iron, non-alloy steel or other alloy steel, whether or not in coils (including ‘cut-to-length’ and ‘narrow strip’ products), not further worked than hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated, originating in the People's Republic of China.
Prej „Hebei Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.
The product concerned is currently falling within CN codes 72081000, 72082500, 72082600, 72082700, 72083600, 72083700, 72083800, 72083900, 72084000, 72085210, 72085299, 72085310, 72085390, 72085400, 72111300, 72111400, 72111900, ex72251910 (TARIC code 7225191090), 72253090, ex72254060 (TARIC code 7225406090), 72254090, ex72261910 (TARIC code 7226191090), 72269191 and 72269199.
Chengde Branch“.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/181 z dne 10. februarja 2016 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Ruske federacije (UL L 37, 12.2.2016, str.
Company
1).
TARIC Additional Code
PRILOGA
Handan Iron & Steel Group Han-Bao Co., Ltd
Ime
Hesteel Co., Ltd Tangshan Branch [25]
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
Hesteel Co., Ltd Chengde Branch [26]
Ljudska republika Kitajska
Zhangjiagang Hongchang Plate Co., Ltd
Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Union Co., Ltd.
Zhangjiagang GTA Plate Co., Ltd
Jiangyin Xingcheng Special Steel Works Co., Ltd.
Other cooperating companies listed in Annex I
Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd.
See the Annex
Rizhao Steel Wire Co., Ltd.
The application of the individual anti-dumping duty rates specified for the companies mentioned in paragraph 2 shall be conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, on which shall appear a declaration dated and signed by an official of the entity issuing such invoice, identified by his/her name and function, drafted as follows: ‘I, the undersigned, certify that the (volume) of hot-rolled flat steel products sold for export to the European Union covered by this invoice was manufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in the (country concerned).
Rizhao Baohua New Material Co., Ltd.
I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct.’
Tangshan Yanshan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd.
Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
Ista zainteresirana stran je navedla, da so bili stroški na enoto vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije v obravnavanem obdobju razen leta 2014 ne glede na (velik ali majhen) obseg uvoza iz Kitajske vedno višji od njihovih prodajnih cen.
Where any new exporting producer in the People's Republic of China provides sufficient evidence to the Commission that:
Navedla je tudi, da so vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije v obravnavanem obdobju večinoma ostali nedobičkonosni.