natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
a description of the information, and processes for ensuring availability in an appropriate timescale of that information required for the purposes of valuation, in particular pursuant to Articles 36 and 49 of Directive 2014/59/EU, and market ability, in particular pursuant to the marketing requirements for the sale of business and bridge bank tools;
opis informacij in postopkov, da se v ustreznem roku zagotovi razpoložljivost takih informacij za namene vrednotenja, zlasti v skladu s členoma 36 in 49 Direktive 2014/59/EU, ter tržljivosti, zlasti v skladu z zahtevami glede trženja za instrumente prodaje poslovanja in premostitvene institucije;
a mapping of critical functions and core business lines to legal entities which identifies in particular the critical functions and core business lines carried out by entities subject to resolution actions and the critical functions or core business lines spread across legal entities which would be separated by implementation of the resolution strategy;
razporeditev kritičnih dejavnosti in glavnih poslovnih področij po pravnih subjektih, pri čemer se zlasti opredelijo kritične dejavnosti in glavna poslovna področja, ki jih izvajajo subjekti, pri katerih se uporabljajo ukrepi reševanja, ter kritične dejavnosti ali glavna poslovna področja, ki so razpeta med več pravnih subjektov in ki bi se pri izvajanju strategije reševanja ločila;
a description of the arrangements for the sharing of information between resolution authorities and other relevant authorities, including where relevant authorities in other Member States or in third countries, in accordance with Article 90 of Directive 2014/59/EU;
opis dogovorov za deljenje informacij med organi za reševanje in drugimi ustreznimi organi, vključno z ustreznimi organi v drugih državah članicah ali v tretjih državah, v skladu s členom 90 Direktive 2014/59/EU;
a detailed description of arrangements for ensuring that information pursuant to Article 11 of Directive 2014/59/EU is up to date and available to resolution authorities when required;
podroben opis ureditev za zagotovitev, da so informacije v skladu s členom 11 Direktive 2014/59/EU aktualne in na voljo organom za reševanje, ko jih potrebujejo;
a description of arrangements to ensure operational continuity of access to critical functions during resolution, including at least the description of:
opis ureditev za zagotovitev neprekinjenega dostopa do kritičnih funkcij med reševanjem, ki vključuje vsaj opis:
critical shared systems and operations which need to be continued to maintain continuity of critical functions and arrangements for ensuring the contractual and operational robustness of their provision in resolution;
kritičnih deljenih sistemov in poslovanja, ki se morajo nadaljevati, da se zagotovi neprekinjeno delovanje kritičnih funkcij in ureditev za zagotovitev pogodbene in operativne zanesljivosti njihovega izvajanja med reševanjem;
internal and external interdependencies which are critical to the maintenance of operational continuity;
notranjih in zunanjih soodvisnosti, ki so kritične za ohranjanje neprekinjenega poslovanja;
arrangements for ensuring any access to payment systems or other financial infrastructures necessary to maintain critical functions, including an assessment of the portability of client positions;
ureditev za zagotovitev morebitnega dostopa do plačilnih sistemov ali drugih finančnih infrastruktur, potrebnih za ohranjanje kritičnih funkcij, vključno z oceno prenosljivosti pozicij strank;
a description of the financing requirements and financing sources necessary for the implementation of the resolution strategy foreseen in the plan, including at least:
opis potreb po financiranju in virov financiranja, potrebnih za izvedbo strategije reševanja, predvidene v načrtu, ki vključuje vsaj:
the description of financing, funding and liquidity requirements implied by the resolution strategy;
opis zahtev glede financiranja, sredstev in likvidnosti iz strategije reševanja;
the description of potential sources of resolution funding, including the terms of financing, preconditions for their use, the timing of their availability, the entities to which they may provide financing, and any collateral requirements;
opis potencialnih virov financiranja reševanja, vključno s pogoji financiranja, predpogoji za njihovo uporabo, časom, ko bodo na voljo, subjekti, katerim lahko zagotovijo financiranje, in vsemi zahtevami po zavarovanju s premoženjem;
where relevant, a description and analysis of how and when an institution or group may apply, in the conditions addressed by the resolution plan, for the use of central bank facilities (other than emergency liquidity assistance or other assistance on non-standard terms) in resolution, including identification of available collateral;
če je relevantno, opis in analizo, kako in kdaj lahko institucija ali skupina v okoliščinah, obravnavanih v načrtu reševanja, zaprosi za posojilo centralne banke (ki ni izredna likvidnostna pomoč ali druga pomoč z nestandardnimi pogoji) pri reševanju, vključno z opredelitvijo razpoložljivega zavarovanja s premoženjem;
for groups, the description of any principles agreed for sharing responsibility for financing between sources of funding in different jurisdictions, including between sources of funding in different Member States pursuant to point (f) of Article 12(3) of Directive 2014/59/EU;
za skupine: opis vseh načel, ki so bila dogovorjena glede deljenja odgovornosti za financiranje med viri financiranja v različnih jurisdikcijah, vključno med viri financiranja v različnih državah članicah v skladu s točko (f) člena 12(3) Direktive 2014/59/EU;
plans for communication with critical stakeholder groups, including at least:
načrte sporočanja s ključnimi skupinami deležnikov, ki vključujejo vsaj:
the management, owners, and staff of the institution or group including procedures for consultation with staff and, where applicable, dialogue with social partners in the resolution process, and an assessment of the impact of the plan on employees;
vodstvo, lastnike in zaposlene institucije ali skupine, vključno s postopki za posvetovanje z zaposlenimi in, če je relevantno, dialogom s socialnimi partnerji v postopku reševanja, ter oceno učinka, ki ga bo načrt imel na zaposlene;
customers, media and the general public;
stranke, medije in širšo javnost;
depositors, shareholders, bondholders, counterparties, financial market infrastructures, and other affected market participants;
imetnike vlog, delničarje, imetnike obveznic, nasprotne stranke, infrastrukturo finančnih trgov in druge prizadete tržne udeležence;
any administrative or judicial bodies from whom approval or authorisation critical to implementing the resolution strategy is required;
vse upravne ali sodne organe, od katerih je potrebna odobritev ali dovoljenje, ki je ključnega pomena za izvajanje strategije reševanja;
any advisors required to implement the resolution strategy;
vse svetovalce, potrebne za izvajanje strategije reševanja;
the conclusions of the assessment of resolvability, including at least:
ugotovitve ocene rešljivosti, ki vključujejo vsaj naslednje:
whether or not the institution or group is currently resolvable;
ali je institucija oziroma skupina trenutno rešljiva ali ne;
a summary of the conclusions of the liquidation assessment required in point (a) of Article 23(1);
povzetek ugotovitev ocene likvidacije, ki se zahteva v točki (a) člena 23(1);
a detailed description of any impediments to resolvability identified, and of any measures proposed by the institution or group or required by the resolution authority to address or remove those impediments;
podroben opis morebitnih ovir za rešljivost, ki so bile ugotovljene, ter vseh ukrepov, ki jih je predlagala institucija ali skupina oziroma ki jih je zahteval organ za reševanje za obravnavanje ali odpravo teh ovir;
a quantified assessment of any change to minimum requirements for eligible liabilities, or the appropriate location of eligible liabilities, that is required to remove or address impediments to resolvability, taking into account the criteria specified in Article 45(6) of Directive 2014/59/EU and further specified in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 45(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU;
kvantitativno oceno vsake spremembe minimalnih zahtev za kvalificirane obveznosti ali ustreznosti lokacije za kvalificirane obveznosti, ki je potrebna za odpravo ali obravnavo ovir za rešljivost, pri čemer so upoštevana merila iz člena 45(6) Direktive 2014/59/EU in ki je podrobneje določena v delegiranih aktih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 45(2) Direktive 2014/59/EU;
any opinion expressed by the institution or group in relation to the resolution plan.
vsa mnenja, ki jih izrazi institucija ali skupina v povezavi z načrtom reševanja.
Assessment of resolvability
Ocena rešljivosti
Stages of assessment
Stopnje ocenjevanja
Resolution authorities shall assess resolvability based on the following consecutive stages:
Organi za reševanje ocenijo rešljivost v naslednjih zaporednih stopnjah:
assessment of the feasibility and credibility of the liquidation of the institution or group under normal insolvency proceedings in accordance with Article 24;
ocena izvedljivosti in verodostojnosti likvidacije institucije ali skupine po običajnih insolvenčnih postopkih v skladu s členom 24;
selection of a preferred resolution strategy for assessment in accordance with Article 25;
izbira preferenčne strategije reševanja za oceno v skladu s členom 25;
assessment of the feasibility of the selected resolution strategy in accordance with Articles 26 to 31;
ocena izvedljivosti izbrane strategije reševanja v skladu s členi 26 do 31;
assessment of the credibility of the selected resolution strategy in accordance with Article 32.
ocena verodostojnosti izbrane strategije reševanja v skladu s členom 32.
Where the resolution authority considers that it is clear that institutions or groups pose similar risks to the financial system or that the circumstances in which their liquidation is unlikely to be feasible are similar, that resolution authority may conduct the assessment of the feasibility and credibility of the liquidation of those institutions or groups in a similar or identical manner.
Če organ za reševanje meni, da je jasno, da institucije ali skupine predstavljajo podobna tveganja za finančni sistem oziroma da so okoliščine, v katerih njihova likvidacija najverjetneje ni izvedljiva, podobne, lahko organ za reševanje oceni izvedljivost in verodostojnost likvidacije teh institucij ali skupin na podoben ali enak način.
The types of institutions referred to in the first subparagraph may in particular be determined in accordance with the criteria referred to in Article 98(1)(j) of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Vrste institucij iz prvega pododstavka se lahko opredelijo zlasti v skladu z merili iz člena 98(1)(j) Direktive 2013/36/EU.
Where a resolution authority concludes that it may not be feasible or credible to wind up the institution or group entities under normal insolvency proceedings, or that resolution action may otherwise be necessary in the public interest because winding up under normal insolvency proceedings would not meet the resolution objectives to the same extent, it shall identify a preferred resolution strategy which is appropriate for the institution or group on the basis of information provided by the institution or group pursuant to Article 11 of Directive 2014/59/EU and the criteria set out in this Regulation.
Če organ za reševanje sklene, da prenehanje institucije ali skupine subjektov po običajnih insolvenčnih postopkih morda ni izvedljivo ali verodostojno oziroma da je zaradi javnega interesa potreben ukrep reševanja, saj prenehanje po običajnih insolvenčnih postopkih ne bi izpolnilo ciljev reševanja v enaki meri, opredeli preferenčno strategijo reševanja, ki je primerna za institucijo ali skupino, na podlagi informacij, ki jih predloži institucija ali skupina v skladu s členom 11 Direktive 2014/59/EU, in meril iz te uredbe.
To the extent necessary, it shall also identify variant strategies to address circumstances in which the strategy would not be feasible or credible.
Kolikor je potrebno, opredeli tudi različice strategije za obravnavo okoliščin, v katerih strategija ne bi bila izvedljiva ali verodostojna.
The assessments of the feasibility and credibility of the preferred resolution strategy shall include assessment of any variant strategies proposed as part of that strategy.
Ocene izvedljivosti in verodostojnosti preferenčne strategije reševanja vključujejo oceno vseh različic strategije, predlaganih v okviru te strategije.
Resolution authorities shall request from the institution or group in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 2014/59/EU such additional information as is necessary to carry out the assessments of the preferred and variant strategies.
Organi za reševanje od institucije ali skupine v skladu s členom 11 Direktive 2014/59/EU zahtevajo takšne dodatne informacije, kot so potrebne za oceno preferenčne strategije in njenih različic.
Where appropriate, a resolution authority shall revise the preferred resolution strategy or consider alternative strategies on the basis of a completed assessment of feasibility and of the credibility of a preferred resolution strategy referred to in paragraph 4.
Organ za reševanje po potrebi pregleda preferenčno strategijo reševanja ali razmisli o alternativnih strategijah na podlagi zaključene ocene izvedljivosti in verodostojnosti preferenčne strategije reševanja iz odstavka 4.
Where a resolution authority revises the preferred resolution strategy it shall assess the feasibility and the credibility of that revised preferred resolution strategy in accordance with Articles 26 and 27 respectively.
Organ za reševanje pri pregledu preferenčne strategije reševanja oceni izvedljivost in verodostojnost pregledane preferenčne strategije reševanja v skladu s členoma 26 oziroma 27.
Feasibility and credibility of liquidation under normal insolvency proceedings
Izvedljivost in verodostojnost likvidacije po običajnih insolvenčnih postopkih
Resolution authorities shall assess the feasibility and credibility of liquidation of the institution or group under normal insolvency proceedings, as well as the impact that liquidation would have in the reliance on extraordinary public financial support as compared to resolution.
Organi za reševanje ocenijo izvedljivost in verodostojnost likvidacije institucije ali skupine po običajnih insolvenčnih postopkih ter učinek, ki bi ga imela ta likvidacija v smislu odvisnosti od izredne javne finančne pomoči v primerjavi z reševanjem.
When assessing the credibility of liquidation, resolution authorities shall consider the likely impact of the liquidation of the institution or group on the financial systems of any Member State or of the Union to ensure the continuity of access to critical functions carried out by the institution or group and achieving the resolution objectives of Article 31 of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Organi za reševanje pri ocenjevanju verodostojnosti likvidacije upoštevajo verjetni učinek likvidacije institucije ali skupine na finančne sisteme katere koli države članice ali Unije, da bi zagotovili neprekinjen dostop do kritičnih funkcij, ki jih opravlja institucija ali skupina, in dosegli cilje reševanja iz člena 31 Direktive 2014/59/EU.
For this purpose, resolution authorities shall take into account the functions performed by the institution or group and assess whether liquidation would be likely to have a material adverse impact on any of the following:
V ta namen organi za reševanje upoštevajo funkcije, ki jih opravlja institucija ali skupina, in ocenijo, ali je verjetno, da bi likvidacija pomembno negativno vplivala na naslednje:
financial market functioning and market confidence;
delovanje finančnih trgov in zaupanje na trgih;
financial market infrastructures, in particular:
infrastrukture finančnih trgov, zlasti:
whether the sudden cessation of activities would constrain the normal functioning of financial market infrastructures in a manner which negatively impacts the financial system as a whole;
ali bi nenadno prenehanje dejavnosti oviralo normalno delovanje infrastruktur finančnih trgov na način, ki bi negativno vplival na finančni sistem kot celoto;
whether and to what extent financial market infrastructures could serve as contagion channels in the liquidation process;
ali in v kakšnem obsegu bi lahko infrastrukture finančnih trgov delovale kot kanal za širjenje negativnih učinkov med procesom likvidacije;
other financial institutions, in particular:
druge finančne institucije, zlasti:
whether liquidation would raise the funding costs of or reduce the availability of funding to other financial institutions in a manner which presents a risk to financial stability;
ali bi se zaradi likvidacije povečali stroški financiranja ali zmanjšala razpoložljivost financiranja za druge finančne institucije na način, ki predstavlja tveganje za finančno stabilnost;
the risk of direct and indirect contagion and macroeconomic feedback effects;
na tveganje neposrednega ali posrednega širjenja negativnih učinkov ter makroekonomskih povratnih učinkov;
the real economy and in particular the availability of critical financial services.
realni sektor gospodarstva ter zlasti na razpoložljivost ključnih finančnih storitev.
If the resolution authority concludes that liquidation is credible, it shall assess the feasibility of liquidation.
Če organ za reševanje sklene, da je likvidacija verodostojna, oceni izvedljivost likvidacije.
For this purpose resolution authorities shall consider whether the institution's or group's systems are able to provide the information required by the relevant deposit guarantee schemes for the purposes of providing payment to covered deposits in the amounts and time frames specified in Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], or where relevant in accordance with equivalent third country deposit guarantee schemes, including on covered deposit balances.Resolution authorities shall also assess whether the institution or the group has the capability required to support the deposit guarantee schemes' operations, in particular by distinguishing between covered and non-covered balances on deposit accounts.
V ta namen organi za reševanje upoštevajo, ali so sistemi institucije ali skupine sposobni zagotavljati informacije, ki jih zahtevajo zadevni sistemi jamstva za vloge za namene zagotavljanja plačil v zvezi s kritimi vlogami v zneskih in časovnih okvirih, določenih v Direktivi 2014/49/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5], ali, kjer je relevantno, v skladu z enakovrednimi sistemi jamstva za vloge tretjih držav, vključno z informacijami o stanjih kritih vlog.Organi za reševanje ocenijo tudi, ali ima institucija ali skupina potrebne zmogljivosti za podporo delovanja sistemov jamstva za vloge, zlasti z razlikovanjem med kritimi in nekritimi stanji na depozitnih računih.
Identification of a resolution strategy
Izbira strategije reševanja
Resolution authorities shall assess whether a candidate resolution strategy is appropriate to achieve the resolution objectives given the structure and business model of the institution or group, and the resolution regimes applicable to legal entities in a group.
Organi za reševanje ocenijo, ali je predlagana strategija reševanja primerna za doseganje ciljev reševanja glede na strukturo in poslovni model institucije ali skupine ter glede na ureditve za reševanje, ki se uporabljajo za pravne subjekte v skupini.
A resolution action may be taken in the public interest if it is necessary for the achievement of and is proportionate to one or more of the resolution objectives and winding up of the institution under normal insolvency proceedings would not meet those resolution objectives to the same extent.
Ukrep za reševanje se lahko sprejme v javnem interesu, če je potreben za doseganje enega ali več ciljev reševanja in je sorazmeren z njimi ter če s prenehanjem institucije v skladu z običajnimi insolvenčnimi postopki teh ciljev reševanja ne bi bilo mogoče doseči v enaki meri.
In particular for groups, resolution authorities shall assess whether it would be more appropriate to apply a single point of entry or a multiple point of entry strategy.
Zlasti pri skupinah organi za reševanje ocenijo, ali bi bilo primerneje uporabiti strategijo z eno ali strategijo z več vstopnimi točkami.
For these purposes resolution authorities shall consider at least the following matters:
Za te namene organi za reševanje upoštevajo vsaj naslednje vidike:
what resolution tools would be used under the preferred resolution strategy and whether those resolution tools are available for legal entities to which the resolution strategy proposes to apply them;
katera orodja za reševanje bi se uporabila v okviru preferenčne strategije reševanja in ali so ta orodja za reševanje na voljo pravnim subjektom, pri katerih naj bi se v skladu s strategijo reševanja uporabila;
the amount of qualifying eligible liabilities under the proposed resolution strategy, the risk of not contributing to loss absorption or recapitalisation, and the legal entities issuing those qualifying eligible liabilities, taking into account that:
znesek ustreznih kvalificiranih obveznosti v skladu s predlagano strategijo reševanja, tveganje neprispevanja k pokritju izgub ali dokapitalizaciji in pravni subjekti, ki izdajo navedene ustrezne kvalificirane obveznosti, ob upoštevanju, da:
single point of entry is more likely to be appropriate if sufficient externally issued eligible liabilities, or liabilities expected to contribute to loss absorption and recapitalisation under the proposed resolution strategy are issued by the top parent or group holding company;
bo strategija z eno vstopno točko verjetneje primerna, če končna nadrejena družba ali holdinška družba skupine izda dovolj zunanje izdanih kvalificiranih obveznosti ali obveznosti, ki naj bi po pričakovanjih prispevale k pokritju izgub ali dokapitalizaciji v skladu s predlagano strategijo reševanja;
multiple point of entry is more likely to be appropriate if the group's eligible liabilities or liabilities expected to contribute to loss absorption and recapitalisation under the proposed resolution strategy are issued by more than one entity or regional or functional subgroup in the group which would be resolved;
bo strategija z več vstopnimi točkami verjetneje primerna, če kvalificirane obveznosti skupine ali obveznosti, ki naj bi po pričakovanjih prispevale k pokritju izgub ali dokapitalizaciji v skladu s predlagano strategijo reševanja, izda več kot en subjekt oziroma regionalna ali funkcionalna podskupina v skupini, ki bi se reševala;
the contractual or other arrangements in place for losses to be transferred between legal entities in a group;
pogodbene in druge ureditve, vzpostavljene za prenos izgub med pravnimi subjekti v skupini;
the operational structure and business model of the institution or group, and in particular whether it is highly integrated or has a decentralised structure with a high degree of separation between different parts of the institution or group, taking into account that:
operativno strukturo in poslovni model institucije ali skupine, še zlasti, ali je zelo integrirana ali ima decentralizirano strukturo z visoko stopnjo ločenosti med različnimi deli institucije ali skupine, ob upoštevanju da:
single point of entry is more likely to be appropriate if a group operates in a highly integrated manner, including by having centralised liquidity management, risk management, treasury functions, or IT and other critical shared services;
bo strategija z eno vstopno točko verjetneje primerna, če skupina posluje na zelo povezan način, kar vključuje centralizirano upravljanje likvidnosti, upravljanje tveganj, zakladniško funkcijo ali informacijsko-tehnološke in druge ključne deljene storitve;