natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This figure shall be understood as sub divided into the following categories: promotion of marketing and improvement of passenger information, comprising running costs of the Mobility Centre Emsland (EUR 116876,09), Purchase of software DIVA-Geo as map-basis for MCE (EUR 17402,90), draft of a bus stop register (EUR 28815,34), Rolling stock (call-a-bus) (EUR 520989,05), bus transport passenger waiting facilities (EUR 59376,46) and software for planning of local passenger transport (EUR 37000).
Sodba z dne 19. januarja 1994 v zadevi SAT Fluggesellschaft proti Evropski organizaciji za varnost zračne plovbe (Eurocontrol), C-364/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:7, točka 19 in naslednje; sodba z dne 12. decembra 2000 v zadevi Aéroports de Paris proti Komisiji, T-128/98, ECLI:EU:T:2000:290, točka 112 in naslednje.
RWE is a leading energy company in Germany.
Glej sklep Komisije v zadevi o državni pomoči N 604/2005 – Public bus transport services in Wittenberg (Storitve javnega avtobusnega prevoza v okrožju Wittenberg), uvodne izjave 72–77.
Dividends and ‘loss coverage for public local passenger transport services’.
Sodba z dne 14. januarja 2004 v zadevi Fleuren Compost proti Komisiji, T-109/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:4.
The German authorities originally indicated the figure EUR 3160667,25 for this cell.
Sodba z dne 12. oktobra 1978 v zadevi Komisija proti Belgiji, 156/77, ECLI:EU:C:1978:180, točka 10.
Later, Germany explained that for 1997 column 3 comprised not only the payments to VGE-Süd but also payments to other companies.
Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega potniškega prevoza ter o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 in št. 1107/70 (UL L 315, 3.12.2007, str. 1).
Only from 1998, there was a clear distinction between payments to VGE-Süd (column 3) and payments for non-integrated school transport, for Deutsche Bahn AG and for other integrated school transport (column 4).
Glej na primer sklep Komisije z dne 20. januarja 2010 v zadevi N 490/2010, Vlaamse regeling voor publiek -private samenwerking voor de bouw van laad- en losinstallaties (UL C 122, 20.4.2011, str. 2); v zvezi s tem glej tudi sklep Komisije z dne 20. julija 2010 v zadevi C17/2010, Firmin srl (UL C 278, 15.10.2010, str. 28).
If 1997 were calculated as in the following years, column 3 would show an amount of EUR 1508790,29 and column 4 an amount of EUR 5936951,31 (shift of EUR 1651876,97 from column 3 to column 4, corresponding to the amount paid to the bus undertakings of Northern and Central Emsland).
Odločitev, ki jo je 20. februarja 2006 sprejel Kreistag okrožja Emsland.
The sum of both columns gives the total amount paid for school transport in Emsland.
Uredba (EU) št. 1315/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2013 o smernicah Unije za razvoj vseevropskega prometnega omrežja in razveljavitvi Sklepa št. 661/2010/EU (UL L 348, 20.12.2013, str. 1).
Also VGE-Süd was compensated under this budgetary line.
Glej opombo 36.
In recital 53 of the opening decision the Commission concluded that drafting the NVP was a task falling within the public policy remit.
Glej opombo 41.
Germany has informed the Commission that the description of category No 71.500 in the budgetary forecast of 2006 ‘Zuwendungen an die Emsländische Eisenbahn nach dem NNVG’ ( ‘subsidies granted to EEB on the grounds of the NNVG’) was wrong since the listed amount of subsidies was not granted to EEB only.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
The category thus was renamed in the budgetary forecast of 2007 into beneficiary-neutral ‘Zuwendungen nach dem NNVG’ ( ‘subsidies on the grounds of the NNVG’).
Sklep Komisije, da začne postopek (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka), je bil 9. julija 2008 objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4].
In recital 107 of the opening decision the Commission concluded that the purchase of the DIVA-Geo software, the drawing up of a bus-stop register and the acquisition of a public transport planning software were all linked to the elaboration of the NVP and thus public tasks.
Komisija je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 of the Council of 26 June 1969 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 156, 28.6.1969, p. 1).
Pritožniki so na podlagi sklepa o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave prvi sklop pripomb poslali 21. februarja 2008.
Regulation (EEC) No 1107/70 of the Council of 4 June 1970 on the granting of aids for transport by rail, road, and inland waterway (OJ L 130, 15.6.1970, p. 1).
Po objavi so 25. avgusta 2008 in 29. avgusta 2008 predložili nadaljnje pripombe.
Recital 50 of the opening decision.
Podjetje Nahverkehrsberatung Südwest je pripombe predložilo 29. julija 2008 ter 16. in 29. oktobra 2008 poslalo nezaupne različice informacij.
280310 RWE shares with a market value of approx.
Še ena tretja stran, ki se je odločila, da bo ostala anonimna, je pripombe predložila 23. julija 2008.
EUR 9686523,78, see recital 27 above.
Kreisausschuss (organ odločanja okrožja Emsland) je julija 1995 sklenil, da bo ustanovil center za mobilnost okrožja Emsland.
The European Commission sent this information request on 13 March 2007.
Takrat je okrožje Emsland ugotovilo, da pomanjkanje informacij o javnem prevozu, ki so bile na voljo v regiji, pomeni velik primanjkljaj za politiko javnega prevoza.
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p.
Nemški organi so pojasnili, da je okrožje Emsland financiralo nakup petih novih avtobusov podjetja EEB v skupnem znesku 685513,46 EUR.
9).
520989,05 EUR za štiri avtobuse leta 2006 in 164524,42 EUR za peti avtobus leta 2007.
This is in line with the Commission's conclusions in recital 143 of the opening decision.
Po njihovih navedbah so se stroški za šolski prevoz, ki ga je izvajalo združenje VGE-Süd, v obdobju 1997–2007 le malenkostno razlikovali (za približno 6 %).
See also recital 148 of the opening decision.
Za podvojitev zneskov, navedenih v stolpcu 4, v istem obdobju niso imeli pojasnila.
37630 shares with a market value of approx.
zaradi pritožb istih pritožnikov Komisiji so bile vse pogodbe za neintegrirani šolski prevoz 31. decembra 2005 razveljavljene.
EUR 1689264,40.
Posledično je bil šolski prevoz reorganiziran in nekatere neintegrirane linije so bile vključene v linijski avtobusni prevoz.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 12 September 2000, Pavlov and Others, Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:428, paragraph 74; Judgment of 10 January 2006, Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA and Others, C-222/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:8, paragraph 107.
Komisija v zvezi s stolpcem 1 ugotavlja, da so bili prvotni ustanovitveni kapital in večina delnic RWE [26] že na voljo subjektu v okviru subjekta upravljanja (EE), ki je bil ustanovljen 1. januarja 1997.
Judgment of 12 December 2000, Aéroports de Paris v Commission, T-128/98, ECLI:EU:T:2000:290, paragraph 108.
Kot je poudarila Nemčija, se je ustanovitveni kapital prispeval in večina delnic RWE prenesla več kot 10 let pred tem, ko je bila na Nemčijo [27] naslovljena prva zahteva po informacijah v zvezi s temi prenosi.
Judgment of 11 July 1996, SFEI and Others, C-39/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, paragraph 60; Judgment of 29 April 1999, Spain v Commission, C-342/96, ECLI:EU:C:1999:210, paragraph 41.
Nemčija ni predložila dokazov, da bi davčna optimizacija, ki naj bi jo to okrožje domnevno doseglo, presegala tržno vrednost delnic iz leta 1998.
Judgment in SFEI and Others, footnote 27 above, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, paragraphs 60 and 61.
V vsakem primeru koristi davčne optimizacije ne bi bilo deležno okrožje Emsland, ampak EEB.
See, for instance, Judgment of 21 March 1990, Belgium v Commission (‘Tubemeuse’), C-142/87, ECLI:EU:C:1990:125, paragraph 29; Judgment of 21 March 1991, Italy v Commission (‘ALFA Romeo’), C-305/89, ECLI:EU:C:1991:142, paragraphs 18 and 19; Judgment of 30 April 1998, Cityflyer Express v Commission, T-16/96, ECLI:EU:T:1998:78, paragraph 51; Judgment of 21 January 1999, Neue Maxhütte Stahlwerke and Lech-Stahlwerke v Commission, Joined Cases T-129/95, T-2/96 and T-97/96, ECLI:EU:T:1999:7, paragraph 104; Judgment of 6 March 2003, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission, Joined Cases T-228/99 and T-233/99, ECLI:EU:T:2003:57, paragraph 245.
V skladu s stalno prakso odločanja se pomoč za usklajevanje prevoza na podlagi člena 93 PDEU šteje za združljivo z notranjim trgom, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
Judgment of 24 July 2003, Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
Nemški organi so za to celico prvotno navedli znesek v višini 3160667,25 EUR.
Judgment of 4 April 2001, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, T-288/97, ECLI:EU:T:2001:115, paragraph 41.
Pozneje je Nemčija pojasnila, da so bila v stolpcu 3 za leto 1997 navedena ne le plačila združenju VGE-Süd, ampak tudi plačila drugim podjetjem.
Judgment of 12 September 2000, Pavlov and Others, Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:428, paragraph 74; Judgment of 10 January 2006, Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA and Others, C-222/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:8, paragraph 107.
PODJETJE NAHVERKEHRSBERATUNG SÜDWEST
19 et seq.; Judgment of 12 December 2000, Aéroports de Paris v Commission, T-128/98, ECLI:EU:T:2000:290, paras.
„Če finančna pomoč države okrepi položaj podjetja glede na druga konkurenčna podjetja v trgovini znotraj Skupnosti, se slednja štejejo, da so pod vplivom pomoči.“ [38] Za prenos delnic iz leta 1998 bi se zato moralo šteti, da bi lahko vplival na trgovino med državami članicami, če delnice krepijo položaj podjetja EEB na trgu in njegovo sposobnost, da se poteguje za dovoljenja za linijski prevoz.
Council Decision (EU) 2017/651
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2017/651
appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, of the Committee of the Regions
o imenovanju člana Odbora regij na predlog Kraljevine Nizozemske
A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate on the basis of which Ms A.
Zaradi konca mandata, na podlagi katerega je bila predlagana Annemiek JETTEN (Mayor of Sluis), se je sprostilo mesto člana Odbora regij –
(Annemiek) JETTEN (Mayor of Sluis) was proposed,
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Article 1
Za preostanek mandata, ki se izteče 25. januarja 2020, se za članico Odbora regij imenuje:
The following is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:
Annemiek JETTEN, Mayor of the municipality of Vlaardingen (sprememba mandata).
Ms A.
Člen 2
(Annemiek) JETTEN, Mayor of the municipality of Vlaardingen (change of mandate).
Ta sklep začne veljati na dan sprejetja.
Article 2
V Luxembourgu, 3. aprila 2017
Done at Luxembourg, 3 April 2017.
Predsednik
Commission Decision (EU) 2017/652
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/652
on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’
o predlagani državljanski pobudi z naslovom „Zaščita manjšin – milijon podpisov za raznolikost Evrope“ (Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe)
(notified under document C(2017) 2200)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2017) 2200)
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on the citizens' initiative [1], and in particular Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 211/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o državljanski pobudi [1] in zlasti člena 4 Uredbe,
By Commission Decision C(2013) 5969 of 13 September 2013 registration of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ was refused.
S Sklepom Komisije C(2013) 5969 z dne 13. septembra 2013 je bila zavrnjena prijava predlagane državljanske pobude z naslovom „Zaščita manjšin – milijon podpisov za raznolikost Evrope“ (Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe).
The General Court of the European Union in its judgment of 3 February 2017 (case T-646/13) annulled that Decision, on the ground that the Commission has failed to comply with its obligation to state reasons by not indicating those of the measures which, among those set out in the annex to the proposed ECI, did not fall within its competence, nor the reasons in support of that conclusion.
Splošno sodišče Evropske unije je v sodbi z dne 3. februarja 2017 (zadeva T-646/13) navedeni sklep razveljavilo z obrazložitvijo, da je Komisija s tem, da ni navedla, niti kateri ukrepi od tistih, ki so navedeni v prilogi k predlogu EDP, ne spadajo v njeno pristojnost niti razlogov v utemeljitev tega sklepa, kršila obveznost obrazložitve.
In order to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the General Court a new Commission Decision on the request for registration of the proposed citizens' initiative has to be adopted.
Da bi sprejeli ukrepe, potrebne za izvršitev sodbe Splošnega sodišča, je treba sprejeti nov sklep Komisije o zahtevku za prijavo predlagane državljanske pobude.
The subject matter of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ refers to the following ‘We call upon the EU to improve the protection of persons belonging to national and linguistic minorities and strengthen cultural and linguistic diversity in the Union’.
Predmet predlagane državljanske pobude z naslovom „Zaščita manjšin – milijon podpisov za raznolikost Evrope“ se nanaša na poziv EU k izboljšanju varstva oseb, ki pripadajo narodnostnim in jezikovnim manjšinam, ter h krepitvi kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti v Uniji.
The objectives of the proposed citizens' initiative refer to the following ‘We call upon the EU to adopt a set of legal acts to improve the protection of persons belonging to national and linguistic minorities and strengthen cultural and linguistic diversity in the Union.
Cilji predlagane državljanske pobude se nanašajo na poziv EU, naj sprejme vrsto pravnih aktov za izboljšanje varstva oseb, ki pripadajo narodnostnim in jezikovnim manjšinam, ter h krepitvi kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti v Uniji.
It shall include policy actions in the areas of regional and minority languages, education and culture, regional policy, participation, equality, audiovisual and other media content, and also regional (state) support’.
Zajemajo naj ukrepe politike na področju regionalnih in manjšinskih jezikov, izobraževanja in kulture, regionalne politike, udeležbe, enakosti, avdiovizualnih in drugih medijskih vsebin ter tudi regionalne (državne) podpore.
The annex to the proposed citizens' initiative mentions specifically 11 legal acts of the Union for which the proposed citizens' initiative aims, in essence, at proposals from the Commission, namely:
Priloga k predlagani državljanski pobudi posebej omenja enajst pravnih aktov Unije, pri katerih je dejanski cilj državljanske pobude, da Komisija pripravi predloge, in sicer za:
a recommendation of the Council ‘on the protection and promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity in the Union’ on the basis of the second indent of Article 167(5) TFEU and the second indent of Article 165(4) TFEU;
priporočilo Sveta o varstvu in spodbujanju kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti v Uniji na podlagi druge alinee člena 167(5) PDEU in druge alinee člena 165(4) PDEU;
a decision or a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the basis of the first indent of Article 167(5) TFEU and the first indent of Article 165(4) TFEU, the subject matter of which is to adapt ‘funding programmes so that they become accessible for small regional and minority language communities’;
sklep ali uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta na podlagi prve alinee člena 167(5) PDEU in prve alinee člena 165(4) PDEU za prilagoditev programov financiranja za olajšanje dostopa do njih za majhne regionalne in manjšinske jezike;
a decision or a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the basis of the first indent of Article 167(5) TFEU and the first indent of Article 165(4) TFEU, the subject matter of which is to create a centre for linguistic diversity that will strengthen awareness of the importance of regional and minority languages and will promote diversity at all levels and be financed mainly by the European Union;
sklep ali uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta na podlagi prve alinee člena 167(5) PDEU in prve alinee člena 165(4) PDEU za ustanovitev centra za jezikovno raznolikost, ki bo krepil zavedanje o pomembnosti regionalnih in manjšinskih jezikov in spodbujal raznolikost na vseh ravneh ter ga bo pretežno financirala Unija;
a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the basis of Articles 177 TFEU and 178 TFEU, the subject matter of which is to adapt the common provisions relating to EU regional funds in such a way that the protection of minorities and the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity are included therein as thematic objectives;
uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta na podlagi členov 177 in 178 PDEU za prilagoditev skupnih določb o regionalnih skladih EU, tako da bosta varstvo manjšin ter spodbujanje kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti zajeta v njih kot tematska cilja;
a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the basis of Articles 173(3) TFEU and 182(1) TFEU, the subject matter of which is to change the regulation relating to the ‘Horizon 2020’ programme for the purposes of improving research on the added value that national minorities and cultural and linguistic diversity may bring to social and economic development in regions of the EU;
uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta na podlagi členov 173(3) in 182(1) PDEU za spremembo uredbe o programu „Obzorje 2020“, da bi se izboljšale raziskave o dodani vrednosti, ki jo narodnostne manjšine ter kulturna in jezikovna raznolikost lahko prispevajo k socialnemu in gospodarskemu razvoju v regijah EU;
a Council directive, regulation or decision on the basis of Article 20(2) TFEU and Article 25 TFEU, for the purpose of strengthening within the EU the place of citizens belonging to a national minority, with the aim of ensuring that their legitimate concerns are taken into consideration in the election of Members of the European Parliament;
direktivo, uredbo ali sklep Sveta na podlagi členov 20(2) in 25 PDEU, da bi se v EU okrepil položaj državljanov, ki pripadajo narodnostnim manjšinam, s ciljem zagotavljati, da se njihove legitimne skrbi upoštevajo pri volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta;
effective measures to address discrimination and to promote equal treatment, including for national minorities, in particular through a revision of the existing Council directives on the subject of equal treatment, on the basis of Article 19(1) TFEU;
učinkovite ukrepe za odpravljanje diskriminacije in spodbujanje enakega obravnavanja, med drugim za narodnostne manjšine, zlasti s pregledom obstoječih direktiv Sveta o enakem obravnavanju, na podlagi člena 19(1) PDEU;
the amendment of the EU legislation in order to guarantee approximately equal treatment for stateless persons and citizens of the Union, on the basis of Article 79(2) TFEU;
spremembo zakonodaje EU, da se zagotovi približno enako obravnavanje oseb brez državljanstva in državljanov Unije, na podlagi člena 79(2) PDEU;
a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the basis of Article 118 TFEU, in order to introduce a unitary copyright so that the whole EU can be considered an internal market in the field of copyright;
uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta na podlagi člena 118 PDEU, da se uvede enotna avtorska pravica, ki bi omogočila, da se celotna EU na področju avtorskih pravic obravnava kot notranji trg;
an amendment of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [2], for the purpose of ensuring the freedom to provide services and the reception of audiovisual content in regions where national minorities reside, on the basis of Article 53(1) TFEU and Article 63 TFEU;
spremembo Direktive 2010/13/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], da se zagotovi svobodno opravljanje storitev in sprejemanje avdiovizualnih vsebin v regijah, kjer prebivajo narodnostne manjšine, na podlagi členov 53(1) in 63 PDEU;
a Council regulation or decision, with a view to the block exemption of projects promoting national minorities and their culture, on the basis of Article 109 TFEU, Article 108(4) TFEU or Article 107(3)(e) TFEU.
uredbo ali sklep Sveta, da se določi skupinsko izvzetje projektov, s katerimi se spodbuja narodnostne manjšine in njihovo kulturo, na podlagi členov 109, 108(4) ali 107(3)(e) PDEU.
Legal acts of the Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties can be adopted:
Za izvajanje Pogodb se lahko sprejmejo pravni akti Unije:
in the areas of improvement of the knowledge and dissemination of the culture and history of the European peoples; conservation and safeguarding of cultural heritage of European significance; non-commercial cultural exchanges; and artistic and literary creation, including in the audiovisual sector,
na področju izboljševanja poznavanja in razširjanja kulture in zgodovine evropskih narodov, ohranjanja in varstva kulturne dediščine evropskega pomena; nekomercialne kulturne izmenjave, umetniškega in književnega ustvarjanja, tudi na avdio-vizualnem področju;
in the fields of developing the European dimension in education, including inter alia through the teaching and dissemination of the languages of the Member States,
na področju razvoja evropske razsežnosti v izobraževanju, med drugim s poučevanjem in razširjanjem jezikov držav članic;
in defining the tasks, priority objectives and the organisation of the Structural Funds provided that the actions to be financed lead to the strengthening of the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union,
pri opredelitvi nalog, prednostnih ciljev in organizacije strukturnih skladov, pod pogojem, da bodo ukrepi, ki se bodo financirali, vodili h krepitvi ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije v Uniji;
on specific measures in support of action taken in the Member States to achieve the objectives of speeding up the adjustment of industry to structural changes, encouraging an environment favourable to initiative and to the development of undertakings throughout the Union, particularly small and medium-sized undertakings, encouraging an environment favourable to cooperation between undertakings, fostering better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development,
o posebnih ukrepih v podporo ukrepanju držav članic za doseganje ciljev pospeševanja prilagajanja industrije strukturnim spremembam, spodbujanja okolja, ki je naklonjeno pobudam in razvoju podjetij v celotni Uniji, zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij, spodbujanja okolja, ki je naklonjeno sodelovanju med podjetji, in pospeševanja boljšega izkoriščanja industrijskega potenciala politik na področju inovacij, raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja;
in the area of research and technological development in the form of a multiannual framework programme establishing the scientific and technological objectives to be achieved by the Union's activities and fixing the relevant priorities, indicating the broad lines of such activities and fixing the maximum overall amount and the detailed rules for Union financial participation in the framework programme and the respective shares in each of the activities provided for,
na področju raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja v obliki večletnega okvirnega programa za opredelitev znanstvenih in tehnoloških ciljev, ki naj se dosežejo z dejavnostmi Unije, ter za določitev ustreznih prednostnih nalog, s splošnim orisom takih dejavnosti ter določitvijo najvišjega skupnega zneska in podrobnih pravil za finančno udeležbo Unije v okvirnem programu in zadevnih deležev za vsako opredeljeno dejavnost;