natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Member States shall withdraw authorisations for plant protection products containing repellents by smell of animal or plant origin/tall oil crude as active substance by 24 October 2017 at the latest.
Države članice prekličejo registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo repelente po vonju živalskega ali rastlinskega izvora/surovo talovo olje, kot aktivno snov, do najpozneje 24. oktobra 2017.
Any grace period granted by Member States in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 shall be as short as possible and shall expire by 24 October 2018 at the latest.
Morebitno prehodno obdobje, ki ga države članice odobrijo v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, je čim krajše, izteče pa se najpozneje do 24. oktobra 2018.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 637/2012 of 13 July 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the conditions of approval of the active substances iron sulphate, repellents by smell of animal or plant origin/tall oil crude and repellents by smell of animal or plant origin/tall oil pitch (OJ L 186, 14.7.2012, p. 20).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 637/2012 z dne 13. julija 2012 o spremembi Izvedbene Uredbe (EU) št. 540/2011 glede pogojev za registracijo aktivnih snovi železov sulfat, repelenti po vonju živalskega ali rastlinskega izvora/surovo talovo olje in repelenti po vonju živalskega ali rastlinskega izvora/smola talovega olja (UL L 186, 14.7.2012, str. 20).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances (OJ L 153, 11.6.2011, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 z dne 25. maja 2011 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede seznama registriranih aktivnih snovi.(UL L 153, 11.6.2011, str. 1).
Technical report on the outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment of confirmatory data for tall oil crude.
14 str.
EFSA supporting publication 2015:EN-781.
EFSA (Evropska agencija za varnost hrane), 2015.
14 pp.
Tehnično poročilo o izidu posvetovanja z državami članicami, vlagateljem in EFSA o oceni tveganja pesticidov na podlagi potrditvenih podatkov za surovo talovo olje.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1187
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1187
imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain coated fine paper originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 18 Uredbe,
Following an anti-subsidy investigation (‘the original investigation’), by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 452/2011 [2], the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain coated fine paper originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or ‘country concerned’).
Svet je po protisubvencijski preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 452/2011 [2] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz nekaterih vrst premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“).
Following an anti-dumping investigation, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 451/2011 [3], the Council also imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain coated fine paper originating in the PRC.
Svet je po protidampinški preiskavi z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 451/2011 [3] uvedel tudi dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih vrst premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz LRK.
The countervailing measures took the form of an ad valorem duty rate ranging from 4 % to 12 % for imports from individually named exporters, with a residual duty rate of 12 %.
Izravnalni ukrepi so bili v obliki stopnje dajatve ad valorem na uvoz poimensko navedenih izvoznikov, ki je znašala od 4 % do 12 %, stopnja preostale dajatve pa je znašala 12 %.
On 8 August 2011, the Chinese producers Gold East Paper Co.
Kitajska proizvajalca Gold East Paper Co.
Ltd and Gold Huasheng Paper Co.
Ltd. in Gold Huasheng Paper Co.
Ltd (‘the APP Group’), lodged applications for annulment of both Implementing Regulation (EU) No 451/2011 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 452/2011 insofar as they concern the applicants [4].
Ltd. („skupina APP“) sta 8. avgusta 2011 vložila tožbi, s katerima sta predlagala, naj se Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 451/2011 in Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 452/2011 razglasita za nični v delih, v katerih se nanašata na tožeči stranki [4].
On 11 September 2014, the Third Chamber of the General Court dismissed both actions.
Tretji senat Splošnega sodišča je 11. septembra 2014 obe tožbi zavrnil.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [5] of the countervailing measures in force on the imports of certain coated fine paper originating in the PRC, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [5] izravnalnih ukrepov, ki veljajo za uvoz nekaterih vrst premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz LRK, prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by five Union producers (Arctic Paper Grycksbo AB, Burgo Group SpA, Fedrigoni SpA, Lecta Group and Sappi Europe SA), jointly referred to as the ‘applicant’, representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of coated fine paper.
Zahtevek je vložilo pet proizvajalcev Unije (Arctic Paper Grycksbo AB, Burgo Group SpA, Fedrigoni SpA, Lecta Group in Sappi Europe SA), skupaj imenovanih „vložnik“, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje premazanega finega papirja v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in continuation of subsidisation and recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi se zaradi izteka ukrepov verjetno nadaljevalo subvencioniranje in ponovila škoda industriji Unije.
Having determined that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 13 May 2016, by notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6] (‘the Notice of Initiation’) the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov, zato je 13. maja 2016 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Prior to the initiation of the expiry review, and in accordance with Articles 10(7) and 33(a) of the basic Regulation, the Commission notified the Government of China (‘GOC’) that it had received a properly documented review request and invited the GOC for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation as regards the content of the review request and arriving at a mutually agreed solution.
Komisija je pred začetkom pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov ter v skladu s členoma 10(7) in 33(a) osnovne uredbe uradno obvestila kitajsko vlado, da je prejela ustrezno dokumentiran zahtevek za pregled, ter jo povabila k posvetovanju, da bi se razjasnil položaj glede vsebine zahtevka za pregled in dosegla sporazumna rešitev.
The GOC accepted the offer for consultations and consultations were subsequently held on 11 May 2016.
Kljub temu sporazumne rešitve ni bilo mogoče doseči.
During the consultations, due note was taken of the comments submitted by the authorities of the PRC.
Preiskava
However, no mutually agreed solution could be reached.
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom in obravnavano obdobje
Investigation
Preiskava glede verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve subvencioniranja je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2015 do 31. decembra 2015 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
Review investigation period and period considered
Proučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajemalo obdobje od 1. januarja 2012 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidisation covered the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Zadevne strani
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2012 to the end of the review investigation period (the ‘period considered’).
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj se ji javijo, če želijo sodelovati v preiskavi.
Parties concerned
Poleg tega je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov posebej obvestila vložnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike in uporabnike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in kitajske organe ter jih pozvala k sodelovanju.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission invited interested parties to contact it in order to participate in the investigation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost v rokih iz obvestila o začetku pisno izraziti stališča in zahtevati zaslišanje.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the applicant, other known Union producers, exporting producers, importers and users in the Union known to be concerned as well as the Chinese authorities of the initiation of the expiry review, and invited them to participate.
Vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so to zahtevale, je bilo odobreno zaslišanje pred Komisijo.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and request a hearing within the time limits set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Vzorčenje
All interested parties, who requested so, were granted a hearing with the Commission.
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK
Sampling
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe morda izbrala vzorec zainteresiranih strani.
Sampling of exporting producers in the PRC
Da bi se odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, je vseh 36 znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK pozvala, naj zagotovijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample interested parties, in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je misijo Ljudske republike Kitajske pri Evropski uniji prosila, naj opredeli morebitne druge proizvajalce izvoznike, ki bi morda želeli sodelovati v preiskavi, in/ali stopi v stik z njimi.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known 36 exporting producers in the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Informacije, ki so bile zaradi vzorčenja zahtevane v Prilogi I k obvestilu o začetku, je predložila le ena skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK [9].
In addition, the Commission requested the Mission of the People's Republic of China to the European Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Slednja je Komisijo na zaslišanju 8. junija 2016 obvestila, da vprašalnika ne namerava izpolniti.
Only one group of exporting producers in the PRC provided the information requested in Annex I to the Notice of Initiation for the purpose of sampling [9].
To je pojasnila z dejstvom, da v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ni izvažala na trg Unije in da ima zapleteno strukturo.
At a hearing on 8 June 2016 the same group of exporting producers informed the Commission that it did not intend to provide a reply to the questionnaire.
Vsi znani zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki in organi LRK so bili obveščeni o posledicah nesodelovanja in dejstvu, da lahko Komisija v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe ugotovitve sprejme na podlagi najboljših razpoložljivih dejstev.
This was explained by no exports sales to the Union market during the review investigation period and the complex group structure.
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev Unije
All known exporting producers concerned, and the authorities of the PRC were informed about the consequences of non-cooperation and that in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation, the Commission may make its findings on the basis of the best facts available.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
Sampling of Union producers
V skladu s členom 27(1) osnovne uredbe je izbrala vzorec na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega prodaje in proizvodnje, pri čemer je upoštevala tudi geografsko porazdelitev.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers.
Predhodni vzorec je zajemal tri skupine proizvajalcev Unije.
In accordance with Article 27(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the sample on the basis of the largest representative volume of sales and production, taking also into account the geographical spread.
Komisija je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe glede začasnega vzorca.
The preliminary sample consisted of three groups of Union producers.
Eden od začasno vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije je Komisijo obvestil, da vprašalnika ne bo mogel izpolniti.
The Commission invited interested parties to comment on the provisional sample.
Komisija je prejela tudi pojasnilo, da sta drugi dve vzorčeni strani skupini, sestavljeni iz več proizvajalcev.
One of the provisionally sampled Union producers informed the Commission that it would not be in a position to reply to the questionnaire.
Zato je spremenila vzorec, in sicer je nesodelujočega proizvajalca nadomestila z naslednjim največjim proizvajalcem glede na obseg prodaje in proizvodnje, iz drugih dveh skupin začasno vzorčenih proizvajalcev pa izbrala največje proizvajalce.
The Commission also received a clarification that two other sampled parties were groups consisting of several producers.
Ker v roku ni prejela pripomb glede spremenjenega vzorca, ga je potrdila kot spremenjenega.
Accordingly, the Commission revised the sample by replacing the non-cooperating producer with the next largest producer in terms of the volume of sales and production, as well as by selecting the largest producers within the other two groups of provisionally sampled producers.
Končni vzorec je predstavljal več kot 30 % celotne proizvodnje Unije v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, zato se je štelo, da je reprezentativen za industrijo Unije.
Having received no comments on the revised sample within the deadline, the Commission confirmed the sample as revised.
Vzorčenje nepovezanih uvoznikov
The final sample accounted for over 30 % of the total Union production during the review investigation period and was therefore considered representative of the Union industry.
Da bi se Komisija odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, je vse znane nepovezane uvoznike pozvala, naj zagotovijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
Sampling of unrelated importers
Komisija je vzpostavila stik s petimi potencialnimi uvozniki, vendar noben ni izpolnil obrazca za vzorčenje.
To decide whether sampling is necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Vprašalniki
The Commission contacted five potential importers, but none replied to the sampling form.
Vprašalnik – kitajska vlada:
Questionnaires
Komisija je 13. maja 2016 kitajski vladi poslala vprašalnik, ki je vključeval posebne vprašalnike za Kitajsko razvojno banko, Kitajsko izvozno-uvozno banko, Kitajsko kmetijsko banko in družbo China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation („družba Sinosure“), ker so v skladu z informacijami iz zahtevka in/ali prvotne preiskave zagotavljale posojila in finančne storitve industriji premazanega finega papirja.
Questionnaire — Government of China
Poleg tega jo je prosila, naj vprašalnik za banke posreduje vsem drugim finančnim institucijam, za katere ji je znano, da so zagotavljale posojila zadevni industriji.
On 13 May 2016 the Commission sent a questionnaire to the Government of China (‘the GOC’) including specific questionnaires for the China Development Bank, Export Import Bank of China (‘EXIM’), Agricultural Bank of China and China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (‘Sinosure’) based on the fact that they had provided loans and financial services to the coated fine paper industry according to the information in the request and/or in the original investigation.
Komisija je izpolnjeni vprašalnik kitajske vlade prejela 24. junija 2016.
The Commission did not receive a reply from any of the listed above financial institutions.
Komisija je z verbalno noto z dne 7. oktobra 2016 organe LRK obvestila, da namerava zaradi nesodelovanja kitajske vlade v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe ugotovitve sprejeti na podlagi najboljših razpoložljivih dejstev.
On 2 September 2016 the Commission sent a deficiency letter to the GOC.
Opozorila je tudi, da je lahko ugotovitev na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev manj ugodna, kot bi bila ob sodelovanju kitajske vlade.
The GOC requested an extension of the deadline to reply to this deficiency letter.
Vprašalnik – proizvajalci izvozniki
On 23 September 2016 the GOC informed the Commission that it decided not to submit its response to the deficiency letter and confirmed that it will no longer cooperate in the investigation.
Komisija proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki se niso odzvali na njeno zahtevo v obvestilu o začetku, ni poslala vprašalnika.
By Note Verbale of 7 October 2016 the Commission informed the authorities of the PRC that following non-cooperation of the GOC, in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation, the Commission intended to make its findings on the basis of the best facts available.
Vprašalnika ni poslala niti kitajskemu proizvajalcu izvozniku iz uvodne izjave 16, saj je navedel, da ga ne bo izpolnil.
It also noted that a finding based on facts available may be less favourable than if the GOC had cooperated.
Vprašalnik – proizvajalci Unije
Questionnaire — Exporting producers
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala trem vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije in od vseh treh prejela izpolnjene vprašalnike.
No questionnaire was sent to the exporting producers which have not replied to the Commission's request in the Notice of Initiation.
Preveritveni obiski
The Commission did not send a questionnaire to the Chinese exporting producer referred to in recital (16) above either, as it had indicated that it would not reply.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji v okviru pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov zdele potrebne za ugotavljanje subvencioniranja, škode in interesa Unije.
Questionnaire — Union producers
Preveritveni obiski v skladu s členom 26 osnovne uredbe so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih družb Unije:
The Commission sent questionnaires to the three sampled Union producers and received questionnaire replies from all three of them.
Burgo Group S.p.A., Altavilla Vicentina, Italija,
Verification visits
Condat (Lecta Group), Barcelona, Španija,
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary in the context of an expiry review for a determination of subsidisation, injury, and Union interest.
Sappi Europe SA, Brussels, Belgija za Sappi Austria Produktions GmbH&Co KG, Gratkorn, Avstrija.
Verification visits under Article 26 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following Union companies:
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
Burgo Group S.p.A., Altavilla Vicentina, Italy
Zadevni izdelek
Condat (Lecta Group), Barcelona, Spain
Zadevni izdelek so nekatere vrste premazanega finega papirja, tj. na eni ali obeh straneh premazan papir ali karton (razen kraft papirja ali kraft kartona) v listih ali zvitkih, mase med 70 g/m2 in 400 g/m2 in beline nad 84 (merjeno v skladu z ISO 2470-1), s poreklom iz LRK („izdelek, ki se pregleduje“), ki se trenutno uvršča v oznake KN ex48101300, ex48101400, ex48101900, ex48102200, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910 in ex48109980 (oznake TARIC 4810130020, 4810140020, 4810190020, 4810220020, 4810293020, 4810298020, 4810991020 in 4810998020).
Sappi Europe SA, Brussels, Belgium for Sappi Austria Produktions GmbH&Co KG, Gratkorn, Austria
Zadevni izdelek ne zajema:
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
zvitkov, primernih za uporabo na strojih za rotacijski tisk.
Product concerned
Zvitki, primerni za uporabo na strojih za rotacijski tisk, so opredeljeni kot zvitki, katerih rezultat preskusa po preskusnem standardu ISO 3783:2006 za določanje odpornosti proti trganju z metodo pospešene hitrosti ob uporabi preskusne naprave IGT (električni model) je manj kot 30 N/m pri meritvi v prečni smeri papirja in manj kot 50 N/m pri meritvi v smeri stroja.
The product concerned is certain coated fine paper (‘CFP’) which is paper or paperboard coated on one or both sides (excluding kraft paper or kraft paperboard), in either sheet or rolls, and with a weight of 70 g/m2 or more but not exceeding 400 g/m2 and brightness of more than 84 (measured according to ISO 2470-1), and originating in the PRC (‘the product under review’), currently falling within CN codes ex48101300, ex48101400, ex48101900, ex48102200, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910 and ex48109980 (TARIC codes 4810130020, 4810140020, 4810190020, 4810220020, 4810293020, 4810298020, 4810991020 and 4810998020).
večplastnega papirja in večplastnega kartona.
The product concerned does not include:
Podobni izdelek
Rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo naslednji izdelki enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe:
Rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses are defined as those rolls which, if tested according to the ISO test standard ISO 3783:2006 concerning the determination of resistance to picking — accelerated speed method using the IGT tester (electric model), give a result of less than 30 N/m when measuring in the cross-direction of the paper (CD) and a result of less than 50 N/m when measuring in the machine direction (MD).
zadevni izdelek,
Multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard.
izdelek, ki ga proizvajalci izvozniki proizvajajo in prodajajo na domačem trgu LRK,
Like product
izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije.
The investigation showed that the following products have the same basic physical and technical characteristics, as well as the same basic uses:
Komisija je sklenila, da so ti izdelki podobni izdelki v smislu člena 2(c) osnovne uredbe.
the product concerned
VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA SUBVENCIONIRANJA
the product produced and sold by the exporting producers on the domestic market of the PRC
Kot je navedeno v obvestilu o začetku, je Komisija v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo zaradi izteka obstoječih dajatev subvencioniranje nadaljevalo.
the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry
Nesodelovanje in uporaba najboljših razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 28(1) osnovne uredbe
The Commission concluded that these products are like products within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, je kitajska vlada najprej sodelovala s Komisijo in izpolnila vprašalnik.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OF SUBSIDISATION
Vprašalnik pa je bil izpolnjen zelo pomanjkljivo, zato je bil 2. septembra 2016 poslan poziv k dopolnitvi.