natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Weifang and TTCA in their written submissions disputed the direct correlation of the changes in the exported quantities to Malaysia and the transhipments, as the change in exported quantity reflects only the changes in exogenous factors, i.e. decrease in the demand on the market.
Družbi Weifang in TTCA sta v svojih pisnih stališčih izpodbijali neposredno povezavo sprememb količin, izvoženih v Malezijo, in pretovarjanja, saj sprememba izvoženih količin odraža le spremembe zunanjih dejavnikov, tj. zmanjšanje povpraševanja na trgu.
They argued that the conclusion of the Commission on the change in the pattern of trade is not substantiated by evidence and remains only a presumption.
Trdili sta, da ugotovitev Komisije glede spremembe vzorca trgovanja ni utemeljena z dokazi in ostaja le domneva.
The anti-circumvention investigation, as referred to in recital 7, concluded that the measures in force were being circumvented by means of transhipment via Malaysia.
V preiskavi proti izogibanju iz uvodne izjave 7 je bilo ugotovljeno, da izogibanje trenutnim ukrepom poteka tako, da se blago pretovarja prek Malezije.
The anti-circumvention investigation established that a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC and Malaysia to the Union has taken place following the imposition of measures on the product concerned in December 2008, without sufficient due cause or economic justification for such a change other than the imposition of the measures.
Preiskava proti izogibanju je pokazala, da se je po uvedbi ukrepov za zadevni izdelek decembra 2008 znatno spremenil vzorec trgovanja, ki vključuje izvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Malezije v Unijo, ter da za tako spremembo razen uvedbe ukrepov ni zadostnega vzroka ali sprememba ni gospodarsko upravičena.
Consequently, the arguments of TTCA and Weifang cannot be accepted.
Družbi sta sami priznali, da je zaradi njune prodaje nepovezanim trgovcem v tretjih državah zaradi značilnosti blaga in trga sledenje nadaljnji prodaji praktično nemogoče.
Weifang and TTCA do not admit their responsibility to trace their sales to unrelated traders in third countries.
Te ugotovitve potrjujejo, da obstaja veliko tveganje izogibanja ukrepom prek pretovarjanja, zaradi katerih je izvajanje zavez praktično neizvedljivo.
In fact, the companies themselves admitted that having recourse to independent traders in third countries creates an impracticability to trace the re-sales due to the nature of the goods and the market.
Družba TTCA je trdila, da je s tem, ko ni obvestila Komisije o nekaterih spremembah v svoji strukturi, ravnala malomarno, ni pa namerno kršila zaveze.
Such considerations confirm the high risk of circumvention of the measures via transhipments which make the undertaking impracticable.
Družba je trdila, da je Komisiji sporočila spremembe ob dveh priložnostih: med pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa in v preiskavi proti izogibanju.
TTCA claimed to have been negligent, but not intentionally breaching the undertaking when not having informed the Commission of some changes in its corporate structure.
Družba TTCA je trdila, da spremembe niso negativno vplivale na izvajanje zaveze.
The company argued that it had communicated to the Commission the changes on two occasions: during the expiry review as well as during the anti-circumvention investigation.
Komisija ne more sprejeti teh utemeljitev, saj družba ni upoštevala jasne obveznosti poročanja iz zaveze, in sicer, naj nemudoma obvesti Evropsko komisijo o vseh morebitnih spremembah v strukturi družbe, kajti take spremembe lahko povzročijo, da je treba spremeniti nekatere vidike zaveze in/ali njegovega spremljanja, če Komisija presodi, da je to potrebno.
TTCA claimed that the changes did not have any negative impact on the implementation of the undertaking.
Take spremembe je treba priglasiti neposredno in izrecno v okviru dejavnosti spremljanja, zlasti glede na stalen stik med družbami, ki sprejmejo zavezo, in pristojno službo Komisije.
The Commission cannot accept these arguments since the company has not respected a clear reporting obligation set out in the undertaking, namely to immediately notify the European Commission of any changes to its corporate structure, as such changes may give rise to the need to modify certain aspects of the undertaking and/or its monitoring if the Commission deems it necessary.
Poleg tega se je Zbornica skupaj z družbama TTCA in Weifang sklicevala na interes Unije, da ohrani zavezo.
Such changes have to be notified directly and explicitly in the context of monitoring activities, especially given the continuous contact between the undertaking companies and the competent Commission's service.
Zbornica ter družbi TTCA in Weifang trdijo, da bo zaradi umika prišlo do povečanja nestanovitnosti cen, kar je neugodno za uporabnike citronske kisline.
Furthermore, the Chamber together with TTCA and Weifang referred to the Union interest to maintain the undertaking.
Komisija te trditve ne more sprejeti.
The Chamber, TTCA and Weifang argue that as a consequence of the withdrawal there will be an increase in price volatility and that this is unfavourable for the users of citric acid.
Nestanovitnost cen je lahko značilnost katerega koli proizvodnega trga, vendar sama po sebi ni element, ki bi vplival na oceno izvedljivosti ali kršitev zavez.
The Commission cannot accept this argument.
Nobena od trditev, ki so jih predstavili Zbornica in zadevna proizvajalca izvoznika, ne more vplivati na oceno Komisije, da je bila njihova zaveza kršena, njeno spremljanje pa je postalo neizvedljivo.
Price volatility might be a feature of any given product market but as such is not an element that affects the assessment of the practicability or breaches of undertakings.
H. UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZE IN NALOŽITEV DOKONČNIH DAJATEV
None of the arguments presented by the Chamber and the exporting producers concerned is such as to alter the Commission's assessment that their undertaking was breached and its monitoring became impracticable.
Zato je v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne uredbe in v skladu z zadevnimi klavzulami zaveze, ki Komisijo pooblaščajo, da enostransko umakne sprejetje zaveze, Komisija sklenila, da je treba umakniti sprejetje zaveze, ki sta jo ponudili družbi Weifang in TTCA, ter spremeniti Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/87.
H. WITHDRAWAL OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING AND IMPOSITION OF DEFINITIVE DUTIES
Zato bi bilo treba za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvajata družbi Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd. (dodatna oznaka TARIC A882), in TTCA Co., Ltd. (dodatna oznaka TARIC A878), uporabljati dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/82 –
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic Regulation and also in accordance with the relevant clauses of the undertaking authorising the Commission to unilaterally withdraw the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking offered by Weifang and TTCA should be withdrawn and Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 should be amended.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Accordingly, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 should apply to imports of the product concerned produced by the companies Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd (Taric additional code A882), and TTCA Co., Ltd (Taric additional code A878),
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Sprejetje zaveze v zvezi z družbama Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd. (dodatna oznaka TARIC A882) in TTCA Co., Ltd. (dodatna oznaka TARIC A878), skupaj z Gospodarsko zbornico uvoznikov in izvoznikov kovin, rudnin in kemikalij Kitajske, se umakne.
The acceptance of the undertaking in relation to the companies Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd (Taric additional code A882), and TTCA Co., Ltd (Taric additional code A878) together with the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals and Chemicals Importers and Exporters is hereby withdrawn.
Razpredelnica iz člena 1 Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2015/87 se nadomesti z naslednjo razpredelnico:
Article 2
Država
The table of Article 1 in Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 is replaced by the following table:
Družba
Country
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
Company
Ljudska republika Kitajska
Taric Additional Code
COFCO Biochemical (Anhui) Co., Ltd. – No 1 COFCO Avenue, Bengbu City 233010, Anhui Province
People's Republic of China
Proizvaja RZBC Co., Ltd. – No 9 Xinghai West Road, Rizhao City, Shandong Province, LRK
COFCO Biochemical (Anhui) Co., Ltd — No 1 COFCO Avenue, Bengbu City 233010, Anhui Province
in prodaja z njo povezana prodajna družba RZBC Imp.
Manufactured by RZBC Co., Ltd — No 9 Xinghai West Road, Rizhao City, Shandong Province, PRC
Co., Ltd. – No 66 Lvzhou South Road, Rizhao City, Shandong Province
and sold by its related sales company RZBC Imp.
Proizvaja RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. – No 209 Laiyang Road (West Side of North Chengyang Road), Juxian Economic Development Zone, Rizhao City, Shandong Province, LRK
Co., Ltd — No 66 Lvzhou South Road, Rizhao City, Shandong Province
Jiangsu Guoxin Union Energy Co., Ltd. – No 1 Redian Road, Yixing Economic Development Zone, Jiangsu Province
Manufactured by RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd — No 209 Laiyang Road (West Side of North Chengyang Road), Juxian Economic Development Zone, Rizhao City, Shandong Province, PRC
Člen 3
Jiangsu Guoxin Union Energy Co., Ltd — No 1 Redian Road, Yixing Economic Development Zone, Jiangsu Province
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The President
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1193/2008 z dne 1. decembra 2008 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasnih dajatev, ki veljajo za uvoz citronske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 323, 3.12.2008, str. 1).
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.
Sklep Komisije 2008/899/ES z dne 2. decembra 2008 o sprejetju zavez v zvezi s protidampinškim postopkom glede uvoza citronske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 323, 3.12.2008, str. 62).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1193/2008 of 1 December 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duties imposed on imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 323, 3.12.2008, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/82 z dne 21. januarja 2015 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz citronske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 in zaključku delnih vmesnih pregledov v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL L 15, 22.1.2015, str. 8)
Commission Decision 2008/899/EC of 2 December 2008 accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 323, 3.12.2008, p. 62).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/87 z dne 21. januarja 2015 o sprejetju ponujenih zavez v zvezi s protidampinškim postopkom za uvoz citronske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 15, 22.1.2015, str. 75).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 of 21 January 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and of partial interim reviews pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 15, 22.1.2015, p. 8).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/32 z dne 14. januarja 2016 o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/82 na uvoz citronske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz citronske kisline, poslane iz Malezije, ne glede na to, ali je deklarirana kot izdelek s poreklom iz Malezije ali ne (UL L 10, 15.1.2016, str. 3).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 of 21 January 2015 accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 15, 22.1.2015, p. 75).
Na podlagi statističnih podatkov in podatkov, ki sta jih predložili družbi, je razvidno, da sta, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 15, večino izvoza v Malezijo v obdobju 2011–2015 opravila zadevna proizvajalca.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/32 of 14 January 2016 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 on imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of citric acid consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not (OJ L 10, 15.1.2016, p. 3).
Trditev družb TTCA in Weifang zato ni mogoče sprejeti.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/705
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/705
supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions for the application of the derogations concerning currencies with constraints on the availability of liquid assets
o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z regulativnimi tehničnimi standardi, ki določajo pogoje za uporabo odstopanj glede valut, v katerih je razpoložljivost likvidnih sredstev omejena
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 [1], and in particular Article 419(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o bonitetnih zahtevah za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 [1], in zlasti člena 419(5) Uredbe,
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has established international standards regarding the liquidity coverage ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools [2] (BCBS standards).
Baselski odbor za bančni nadzor je vzpostavil mednarodne standarde v zvezi s količnikom likvidnostnega kritja in orodji za spremljanje likvidnostnega tveganja [2] (standardi BCBS).
In order to ensure effective oversight and application of the derogations provided for in Article 419(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and effective monitoring of institutions' compliance with the requirements applicable to those derogations, in line with the BCBS standards, institutions should notify competent authorities when they intend to apply those derogations or when they intend to make a material change to the application of those derogations.
Za zagotavljanje učinkovitega nadzora in uporabe odstopanj iz člena 419(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 in učinkovito spremljanje skladnosti institucij z zahtevami, ki se uporabljajo za navedena odstopanja, bi institucije v skladu s standardi BCBS morale pristojne organe obvestiti, ko nameravajo uporabiti navedena odstopanja ali ko nameravajo pomembno spremeniti uporabo navedenih odstopanj.
The BCBS standards establish guiding principles for supervisors in jurisdictions with insufficient high quality liquid assets.
Standardi BCBS določajo vodilna načela za nadzornike v jurisdikcijah, kjer ni dovolj visokokakovostnih likvidnih sredstev.
In line with Principle 3 of those guiding principles for supervisors, before applying any derogation, in order to demonstrate justified needs, institutions should take reasonable steps, to the extent practicable, to ensure that high quality liquid assets are used and reduce their overall level of liquidity risk to improve compliance with the liquidity coverage requirement.
V skladu z načelom 3 navedenih vodilnih načel za nadzornike morajo institucije za to, da dokažejo utemeljene potrebe, pred uporabo katerega koli odstopanja v največji možni meri sprejeti razumne ukrepe za zagotavljanje, da se uporabljajo visokokakovostna likvidna sredstva, in za zmanjšanje splošne ravni likvidnostnega tveganja, da izboljšajo skladnost z zahtevo glede likvidnostnega kritja.
In line with Principles 1 and 4 of the guiding principles for supervisors set out in the BCBS standards, it is necessary to ensure that institutions do not apply the derogations as an economic choice that maximises their profits through the selection of alternative high quality liquid assets based primarily on yield considerations.
V skladu z načeloma 1 in 4 vodilnih načel za nadzornike iz standardov BCBS je nujno zagotoviti, da institucije odstopanj ne uporabljajo iz gospodarskih razlogov, da bi z izbiro alternativnih visokokakovostnih likvidnostnih sredstev, ki povečajo donos, tako povečale svoje dobičke.
In line with those principles it is also necessary to establish a mechanism for limiting the use of the derogations in order to mitigate risks of non-performance of the alternative assets.
V skladu z navedenimi načeli je nujna tudi vzpostavitev mehanizma za omejevanje uporabe odstopanj za zmanjševanje tveganja nedonosnosti alternativnih sredstev.
Taking into account the BCBS standards it is also necessary to provide for appropriate haircuts for the purposes of the derogation provided for in Article 419(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and to establish rules on the fee for the purposes of the derogation provided for in Article 419(2)(b) of that Regulation.
Ob upoštevanju standardov BCBS je nujno predvideti tudi ustrezne odbitke za namene odstopanja iz člena 419(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 in določiti pravila o proviziji za namene odstopanja iz člena 419(2)(b) navedene uredbe.
In particular, as regards the derogation provided for in Article 419(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, in order to ensure that the price paid by an institution for a central bank credit line is fair, the fee should be composed of two elements.
Zlasti v zvezi z odstopanjem iz člena 419(2)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 bi morala biti provizija za zagotavljanje, da je cena, ki jo institucija plača za kreditno linijo centralne banke, poštena, sestavljena iz dveh elementov.
The first should offset the higher yield earned on the assets kept to secure the credit line in order to ensure that the pricing reflects benefits which accrue independently of the amount currently drawn.
Prvi bi moral izravnati višji donos od sredstev, ki so namenjena za zavarovanje kreditne linije, da se zagotovi, da določanje cene odraža koristi, ki se obračunajo ne glede na trenutno črpani znesek.
The second should reflect the amount of the credit line drawn down.
Drugi element bi moral odražati znesek črpane kreditne linije.
In line with Principle 2 of the guiding principles for supervisors set out in the BCBS standards, the use of the derogations should be limited for all institutions with exposures in the relevant currency.
V skladu z načelom 2 vodilnih načel za nadzornike iz standardov BCBS bi morala biti uporaba odstopanj omejena za vse institucije z izpostavljenostmi v zadevni valuti.
Pursuant to Article 419(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, the derogations applied are to be inversely proportional to the availability of the relevant assets.
V skladu s členom 419(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 so uporabljena odstopanja obratno sorazmerna z razpoložljivostjo ustreznih sredstev.
For those reasons, the use of the derogations should be limited to a percentage of a credit institution's net liquidity outflows in the relevant currency which corresponds to the relevant shortage in liquid assets in that currency.
Zato bi morala biti uporaba odstopanj omejena na odstotek neto likvidnostnih odlivov kreditne institucije v zadevni valuti, ki ustreza zadevnemu pomanjkanju likvidnih sredstev v navedeni valuti.
This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by the European Banking Authority (EBA) to the Commission.
Ta uredba temelji na osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, ki jih je Komisiji predložil Evropski bančni organ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EBA).
EBA has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
EBA je opravila odprta javna posvetovanja o osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, analizirala potencialne povezane stroške in koristi ter prosila za mnenje interesno skupino za bančništvo, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
In accordance with the procedure in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, the Commission has endorsed with amendments the draft regulatory standard submitted by EBA after having sent the draft regulatory standard back to EBA explaining the reasons for the amendments.
V skladu s postopkom iz člena 15 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 je Komisija po tem, ko je osnutek regulativnega standarda skupaj z utemeljitvijo sprememb poslala nazaj EBA, potrdila osnutek regulativnega standarda, ki ga je predložila EBA, skupaj s spremembami.
The EBA provided a formal opinion supporting those amendments,
EBA je predložila uradno mnenje, ki podpira navedene spremembe –
This Regulation specifies the conditions for the application of the derogations referred to in Article 419(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 concerning currencies with constraints on the availability of liquid assets.
Ta uredba določa pogoje za uporabo odstopanj iz člena 419(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 v zvezi z valutami, v katerih je razpoložljivost likvidnih sredstev omejena.
Notification of the derogation
Obveščanje o odstopanju
A credit institution shall notify the competent authority that it intends to apply one or both of the derogations provided for in Article 419(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Kreditna institucija pristojni organ obvesti, da namerava uporabiti eno ali obe odstopanji iz člena 419(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
The notification shall be provided in writing 30 days prior to the date of the first application of the derogation.
Obvestilo se v pisni obliki predloži 30 dni pred datumom prve uporabe odstopanja.
Where an institution intends to make any material change in its application of the derogation(s) as notified in accordance with the first subparagraph, it shall notify the competent authority thereof 30 days prior to the date of the first application of such change.
Če institucija namerava pomembno spremeniti svojo uporabo odstopanj, kot jih je sporočila v skladu s prvim pododstavkom, mora pristojni organ o tem obvestiti 30 dni pred datumom prve uporabe takšne spremembe.
In exceptional circumstances where, due to sudden market developments, idiosyncratic events or other factors outside the control of the institution, it is not possible to notify the competent authorities of a material change 30 days prior to its first application, institutions shall provide a preliminary notification to competent authorities prior to the application of a material change.
V izjemnih okoliščinah, kadar zaradi nenadnih dogodkov na trgu, neobičajnih dogodkov ali drugih dejavnikov izven nadzora institucije pristojnih organov o pomembni spremembi ni mogoče obvestiti 30 dni pred prvo uporabo pomembne spremembe, institucije pristojnim organom pred njeno uporabo predložijo prehodno obvestilo.
The preliminary notification shall provide a description of the nature of the material change together with an indication of the extent to which the intended derogation may be applied, expressed as a percentage of the liquid assets required to be held by an institution to meet its liquidity coverage requirement.
Prehodno obvestilo vsebuje opis narave pomembne spremembe skupaj z navedbo obsega, v katerem se lahko uporabi načrtovano odstopanje, izraženega kot odstotek likvidnih sredstev, ki jih mora imeti institucija, da izpolni zahtevo glede likvidnostnega kritja.
The preliminary notification shall be completed by a notification in accordance with the second subparagraph within 30 days of the first application of any derogation.
Prehodno obvestilo je treba v 30 dneh od prve uporabe katerega koli odstopanja dopolniti z obvestilom v skladu z drugim pododstavkom.