natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Inhalable fraction: if hardwood dusts are mixed with other wood dusts, the limit value shall apply to all wood dusts present in that mixture.
f/ml = vlaken na mililiter.
Respirable fraction.
Delci, ki se jih lahko vdihuje: če je prah trdega lesa zmešan s prahom drugega lesa, se uporablja mejna vrednost, ki se uporablja za prah vseh vrst lesa, ki so prisotni v tej zmesi.
Substantial contribution to the total body burden via dermal exposure possible.
Respirabilna frakcija.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 17 January 2020.
Znaten prispevek k celotni možni obremenitvi telesa prek izpostavljenosti kože.
Directive (EU) 2017/2399 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva (EU) 2017/2399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Directive 2014/59/EU as regards the ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy
o spremembi Direktive 2014/59/EU v zvezi z razvrstitvijo nezavarovanih dolžniških instrumentov v primeru insolventnosti
On 9 November 2015, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) published the Total Loss-absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Term Sheet (‘the TLAC standard’),which was endorsed by the G20 in November 2015.
Odbor za finančno stabilnost je 9. novembra 2015 objavil dokument o pogojih za skupno sposobnost pokrivanja izgub (Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Term Sheet (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „standard TLAC“), ki ga je skupina G-20 potrdila še isti mesec.
The objective of the TLAC standard is to ensure that global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), referred to in the Union framework as global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs), have the loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity necessary to help ensure that, in and immediately following a resolution, critical functions can be continued without taxpayers’ funds (public funds) or financial stability being put at risk.
Cilj standarda TLAC je zagotoviti, da imajo globalne sistemsko pomembne banke (GSPB), v okviru Unije imenovane globalne sistemsko pomembne institucije (GSPI), potrebno sposobnost pokrivanja izgub in dokapitalizacije, ki pomaga zagotoviti, da se v postopku reševanja in takoj po njem kritične funkcije lahko nadaljujejo, ne da bi bil ogrožen denar davkoplačevalcev (javna sredstva) ali finančna stabilnost.
In its communication of 24 November 2015 entitled ‘Towards the completion of the Banking Union’, the Commission committed itself to bringing forward, by the end of 2016, a legislative proposal that would enable the TLAC standard to be implemented into Union law by the internationally agreed deadline of 2019.
Komisija se je v sporočilu z dne 24. novembra 2015 z naslovom „Dokončanje bančne unije“ zavezala, da bo do konca leta 2016 predstavila zakonodajni predlog, ki bi omogočil prenos standarda TLAC v pravo Unije v mednarodno dogovorjenem roku, ki je leto 2019.
Concretely, the Commission proposed that the harmonised minimum level of the TLAC standard for G-SIIs (‘the TLAC minimum requirement’) and the eligibility criteria for liabilities used to comply with that standard should be introduced in Union law through amendments to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], while the institution-specific add-on for G-SIIs and the institution-specific requirement for non-G-SIIs as well as relevant eligibility criteria should be addressed through targeted amendments to Directive 2014/59/EU and to Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6].
Ta direktiva, ki zadeva razvrstitev nezavarovanih dolžniških instrumentov v primeru insolventnosti, dopolnjuje prej navedene zakonodajne akte, katerih spremembe se predlagajo, in Direktivo 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7].(3) Glede na navedene predloge in z namenom zagotoviti pravno varnost za trge in subjekte, za katere veljata minimalna zahteva glede kapitala in kvalificiranih obveznosti ter TLAC, je pomembno, da se zagotovi, da se pravočasno pojasnijo merila primernosti za obveznosti, uporabljena za izpolnjevanje minimalnih zahtev glede kapitala in kvalificiranih obveznosti ter za spoštovanje prava Unije, s katerim se prenese TLAC, ter se uvedejo ustrezne določbe o uporabi predhodnih pravil glede primernosti za tiste obveznosti, za katere so bile izdane, preden so začela učinkovati spremenjena merila primernosti.
This Directive, which concerns the ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy, is complementary to the aforementioned legislative acts, as proposed to be amended, and to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].(3) In view of those proposals and in order to ensure legal certainty for markets and for entities subject to MREL and TLAC, it is important to ensure timely clarity about the eligibility criteria of liabilities used for compliance with MREL and with Union law implementing TLAC, and to introduce appropriate grandfathering provisions for the eligibility of liabilities issued before the revised eligibility criteria come into effect.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da imajo institucije zadostno sposobnost pokrivanja izgub in dokapitalizacije, da zagotovijo nemoteno in hitro kritje izgub in dokapitalizacijo s čim manjšim učinkom na finančno stabilnost ob prizadevanju preprečitve učinka na davkoplačevalce.
Member States should ensure that institutions have sufficient loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity to ensure smooth and fast absorption of losses and recapitalisation with a minimum impact on financial stability and while aiming to avoid an impact on taxpayers.
Za dosego tega bi morale institucije stalno izpolnjevati minimalno zahtevo TLAC, ki bo v pravo Unije prenesena na podlagi spremembe Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, ter zahtevo glede kapitala in kvalificiranih obveznosti, kot je določena v Direktivi 2014/59/EU.
That should be achieved through constant compliance by institutions with the TLAC minimum requirement, which is to be implemented in Union law through an amendment of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, and with a requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities as provided for in Directive 2014/59/EU.
V skladu s standardom TLAC morajo GSPI minimalno zahtevo TLAC izpolniti s podrejenimi obveznostmi, ki so v primeru insolventnosti obravnavane za obveznostmi, izključenimi iz TLAC (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zahteva za podrejenost), pri čemer veljajo nekatere izjeme.
The TLAC standard requires G-SIIs to meet the TLAC minimum requirement, with certain exceptions, with subordinated liabilities that rank in insolvency below liabilities excluded from TLAC (‘subordination requirement’).
Po standardu TLAC se zahteva za podrejenost izpolni s pravnimi učinki pogodbe (poznani kot „pogodbena podrejenost“), zakoni dane jurisdikcije (poznani kot „zakonska podrejenost“) ali dano strukturo podjetja (poznana kot „strukturna podrejenost“).
Under the TLAC standard, subordination is to be achieved through the legal effects of a contract (known as contractual subordination), the laws of a given jurisdiction (known as statutory subordination) or a given corporate structure (known as structural subordination).
Kadar Direktiva 2014/59/EU to zahteva, bi morale institucije, ki spadajo v njeno področje uporabe, svojo za podjetje specifično zahtevo izpolniti s podrejenimi obveznostmi, tako da se čim bolj zmanjša možnost pravnega izpodbijanja s strani upnikov, iz razloga, da so njihove izgube v postopku reševanja večje, kot bi jim nastale v okviru običajnega insolvenčnega postopka (načelo, da noben upnik ne sme biti na slabšem).
Where required by Directive 2014/59/EU, institutions falling within the scope of that Directive should meet their firm-specific requirement with subordinated liabilities so as to minimise the risk of legal challenge by creditors, on the basis that the creditors’ losses in resolution are greater than the losses that they would have incurred under normal insolvency proceedings (the no-creditor-worse-off principle).
Več držav članic v okviru svojega nacionalnega insolvenčnega prava spreminja ali je že spremenilo pravila o razvrstitvi nezavarovanega nadrejenega dolga v primeru insolventnosti, da bi svojim institucijam omogočile učinkovitejše izpolnjevanje zahteve za podrejenost, s tem pa pospešile reševanje.
A number of Member States have amended or are in the process of amending the rules on insolvency ranking of unsecured senior debt under their national insolvency law to allow their institutions to comply with the subordination requirement in a more efficient manner, thereby facilitating resolution.
Doslej sprejeta nacionalna pravila se precej razlikujejo.
The national rules adopted so far diverge significantly.
Neobstoj harmoniziranih pravil Unije ustvarja negotovost tako za institucije izdajateljice kot za investitorje, čezmejnim institucijam pa utegne otežiti uporabo instrumenta za reševanje s sredstvi upnikov.
The absence of harmonised Union rules creates uncertainty for issuing institutions and investors alike and is likely to make the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions more difficult.
Neobstoj harmoniziranih pravil Unije utegne povzročiti tudi izkrivljanje konkurence na notranjem trgu, saj se lahko stroški, ki jih imajo institucije pri izpolnjevanju zahteve za podrejenost, in stroški investitorjev pri nakupu dolžniških instrumentov, ki jih izdajo institucije, po Uniji precej razlikujejo.
The absence of harmonised Union rules is also likely to result in competitive distortions on the internal market, given that the costs for institutions to comply with the subordination requirement and the costs borne by investors when buying debt instruments issued by institutions could differ considerably across the Union.
Evropski parlament je v resoluciji z dne 10. marca 2016 o bančni uniji [8] Komisijo pozval, naj predstavi predloge za nadaljnje zmanjšanje pravnih tveganj v zvezi z zahtevki, temelječimi na načelu, da noben upnik ne sme biti na slabšem, Svet pa jo je v sklepih z dne 17. junija 2016 povabil, naj predstavi predlog o skupnem pristopu k vrstnemu redu upnikov bank, s katerim bi se izboljšala pravna varnost v primeru reševanja.
In its resolution of 10 March 2016 on the Banking Union [8], the European Parliament called on the Commission to present proposals to reduce further the legal risks of claims under the no creditor worse off principle, and, in its conclusions of 17 June 2016, the Council invited the Commission to put forward a proposal on a common approach to the bank creditors’ hierarchy to enhance legal certainty in the event of resolution.
Zato je treba odpraviti znatne ovire za delovanje notranjega trga in se izogniti izkrivljanju konkurence, ki nastaja zaradi neobstoja harmoniziranih pravil Unije glede vrstnega reda upnikov bank, ter preprečiti pojav takih ovir in izkrivljanj v prihodnosti.
It is, therefore, necessary to remove the significant obstacles in the functioning of the internal market and avoid distortions of competition resulting from the absence of harmonised Union rules on bank creditors’ hierarchy and to prevent such obstacles and distortions from arising in the future.
Posledično je ustrezna pravna podlaga za to direktivo člen 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Consequently, the appropriate legal basis for this Directive is Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Da bi se stroški zaradi izpolnjevanja zahteve za podrejenost in morebitni negativni učinki na stroške financiranja zmanjšali na minimum, bi bilo treba v tej direktivi državam članicam dovoliti, da po potrebi ohranijo obstoječi razred navadnega nezavarovanega nadrejenega dolga, katerega izdajanje je za institucije cenejše kot izdajanje katerih koli drugih podrejenih obveznosti.
In order to reduce to a minimum the costs of compliance with the subordination requirement and any negative impact on funding costs, this Directive should allow Member States to keep, where applicable, the existing class of ordinary unsecured senior debt, which is less costly for institutions to issue than any other subordinated liabilities.
Ne glede na to bi bilo treba v tej direktivi zaradi izboljšanja rešljivosti institucij od držav članic zahtevati, da uvedejo nov razred neprednostnega nadrejenega dolga, ki bi moral biti v primeru insolventnosti obravnavan pred kapitalskimi instrumenti in podrejenimi obveznostmi, ki ne štejejo za kapitalske instrumente, vendar za drugimi nadrejenimi obveznostmi.
In order to enhance the resolvability of institutions, this Directive should, nevertheless, require Member States to create a new class of non-preferred senior debt that should rank in insolvency above own funds instruments and subordinated liabilities that do not qualify as own funds instruments, but below other senior liabilities.
Institucije bi morale imeti še naprej možnost, da izdajajo dolžniške instrumente iz razreda nadrejenega dolga in tudi iz razreda neprednostnega nadrejenega dolga.
Institutions should remain free to issue debt in both the senior and the non-preferred senior classes.
Brez poseganja v druge možnosti in izjeme, ki jih v zvezi z izpolnjevanjem zahteve za podrejenost ponuja standard TLAC, bi moral biti za izpolnitev te zahteve od teh dveh razredov primeren samo „neprednostni“ nadrejeni razred.
Of those two classes, and without prejudice to other options and exemptions provided for in the TLAC standard to comply with the subordination requirement, only the non-preferred senior class should be eligible to meet the subordination requirement.
Namen tega je institucijam omogočiti, da za svoje financiranje ali iz katerih koli drugih operativnih razlogov uporabijo cenejši navadni nadrejeni dolg, ter da za pridobitev financiranja ob izpolnjevanju zahteve za podrejenost izdajo dolžniški instrument iz novega razreda neprednostnega nadrejenega dolga.
That is intended to enable institutions to use the less costly ordinary senior debt for their funding or any other operational reasons and to issue debt in the new non-preferred senior class to obtain funding while complying with the subordination requirement.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti dovoljeno, da uvedejo več razredov drugih navadnih nezavarovanih obveznosti, pod pogojem, da zagotovijo – brez poseganja v druge možnosti in izjeme, ki jih ponuja standard TLAC –, da so za izpolnitev zahteve za podrejenost primerni samo dolžniški instrumenti iz razreda neprednostnega nadrejenega dolga.
Member States should be allowed to create several classes for other ordinary unsecured liabilities provided that they ensure, without prejudice to other options and exemptions provided for in the TLAC standard, that only the non-preferred senior class of debt instruments is eligible to meet the subordination requirement.
Za zagotovitev, da novi razred neprednostnih nadrejenih dolžniških instrumentov izpolni merila primernosti, kot so opisana v standardu TLAC in določena v Direktivi 2014/59/EU, s tem pa izboljša pravno varnost, bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da je prvotna pogodbena zapadlost teh dolžniških instrumentov vsaj eno leto, da nimajo vgrajenih izvedenih finančnih instrumentov in sami niso izvedeni finančni instrumenti ter da je v zadevni pogodbeni dokumentaciji in po potrebi prospektu v zvezi z njihovo izdajo izrecno navedena njihova nižja razvrstitev v okviru običajnega insolvenčnega postopka.
To ensure that the new non-preferred senior class of debt instruments meets the eligibility criteria as described in the TLAC standard and as set out in Directive 2014/59/EU, thereby enhancing legal certainty, Member States should ensure that those debt instruments have an original contractual maturity of at least one year, do not contain embedded derivatives and are not derivatives themselves, and that the relevant contractual documentation related to their issuance and, where applicable, the prospectus explicitly refer to their lower ranking under normal insolvency proceedings.
Dolžniški instrumenti s spremenljivo obrestno mero, ki temelji na široko uporabljeni referenčni stopnji, kot je Euribor ali Libor, in dolžniški instrumenti, ki niso denominirani v domači valuti izdajatelja, pod pogojem, da so glavnica, odplačila in obresti denominirani v isti valuti, samo zaradi navedenih značilnosti ne bi smeli šteti za dolžniške instrumente z vgrajenimi izvedenimi finančnimi instrumenti.
Debt instruments with variable interest derived from a broadly used reference rate, such as Euribor or Libor, and debt instruments not denominated in the domestic currency of the issuer, provided that principal, repayment and interest are denominated in the same currency, should not be considered to be debt instruments containing embedded derivatives solely because of those features.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v morebitno zahtevo v nacionalnem pravu, da se zaradi izpolnitve pogojev v zvezi z dolžniškimi instrumenti iz razreda neprednostnega nadrejenega dolga iz te direktive, dolžniški instrumenti v register izdajateljevega podjetja vpišejo kot obveznosti.
This Directive should be without prejudice to any requirement in national law to register debt instruments in the issuer’s company registry for liabilities to meet the conditions for non-preferred senior class of debt instruments provided for in this Directive.
Države članice bi morale zaradi izboljšanja pravne varnosti investitorjev v svojem nacionalnem insolvenčnem pravu zagotoviti, da imajo navadni nezavarovani dolžniški instrumenti in druge navadne nezavarovane obveznosti, ki niso dolžniški instrumenti, višjo prednostno razvrstitev pred dolžniškimi instrumenti iz novega razreda neprednostnega nadrejenega dolga.
To enhance legal certainty for investors, Member States should ensure that ordinary unsecured debt instruments and other ordinary unsecured liabilities that are not debt instruments have a higher priority ranking in their national insolvency laws than the new non-preferred senior class of debt instruments.
Države članice bi morale tudi zagotoviti, da imajo dolžniški instrumenti iz novega razreda neprednostnega nadrejenega dolga višjo prednostno razvrstitev pred kapitalskimi instrumenti in pred vsemi podrejenimi obveznostmi, ki ne štejejo za kapital.
Member States should also ensure that the new non-preferred senior class of debt instruments has a higher priority ranking than the priority ranking of own funds instruments and the priority ranking of any subordinated liabilities that do not qualify as own funds.
Ker ciljev te direktive, in sicer določiti harmonizirana pravila glede razvrstitve nezavarovanih dolžniških instrumentov v primeru insolventnosti za namene okvira Unije za sanacijo in reševanje, in zlasti izboljšati učinkovitost ureditve za reševanje s sredstvi upnikov, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega ukrepa lažje dosežejo na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely to lay down harmonised rules for the insolvency ranking of unsecured debt instruments for the purposes of the Union recovery and resolution framework and, in particular, to improve the effectiveness of the bail-in regime, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Ta direktiva zlasti ne bi smela posegati v druge možnosti in izjeme, ki jih v zvezi z izpolnjevanjem zahteve za podrejenost ponuja standard TLAC.
In particular, this Directive should be without prejudice to other options and exemptions provided for in the TLAC standard to comply with the subordination requirement.
Primerno je, da se spremembe Direktive 2014/59/EU, določene v tej direktivi, uporabljajo za nezavarovane terjatve, nastale zaradi dolžniških instrumentov, izdanih na datum začetka uporabe te direktive ali pozneje.
It is appropriate for the amendments to Directive 2014/59/EU provided for in this Directive to apply to unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments issued on or after the date of application of this Directive.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in čim večjega zmanjšanja prehodnih stroškov pa je treba uvesti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe glede razvrstitve terjatev, nastalih zaradi dolžniških instrumentov, izdanih pred tem datumom, v primeru insolventnosti.
Member States should therefore ensure that the insolvency ranking of all outstanding unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments that institutions have issued before that date is governed by the laws of the Member States as adopted at 31 December 2016.
V tem primeru bi morale biti s pravom držav članic, kot je bilo sprejeto 31. decembra 2016, še naprej urejene samo nezavarovane terjatve, nastale zaradi dolžniških instrumentov, izdanih pred datumom začetka uporabe navedenega novega nacionalnega prava.
To the extent that certain national laws as adopted at 31 December 2016 already address the objective of allowing institutions to issue subordinated liabilities, part or all of the outstanding unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments issued prior to the date of application of this Directive should be able to have the same insolvency ranking as the non-preferred senior debt instruments issued under the conditions of this Directive.
Ta direktiva državam članicam ne bi smela preprečiti, da določijo, da bi se ta direktiva morala uporabljati tudi po tem, ko za subjekte izdajatelje – zlasti zaradi predaje kreditnih ali investicijskih dejavnosti tretji osebi – okvir Unije za sanacijo in reševanje ne velja več.
In addition, after 31 December 2016 and before the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States should be able to adapt their national laws governing the ranking in normal insolvency proceedings of unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments issued after the date of application of such laws in order to comply with the conditions laid down in this Directive.
Ta direktiva harmonizira razvrstitev nezavarovanih terjatev, nastalih zaradi dolžniških instrumentov, v okviru običajnega insolvenčnega postopka in ne zajema razvrstitve vlog v primeru insolventnosti zunaj obstoječih veljavnih določb Direktive 2014/59/EU.
In that case, only the unsecured claims resulting from the debt instruments issued before the application of that new national law should continue to be governed by the laws of the Member States as adopted at 31 December 2016.
Ta direktiva zato ne posega v obstoječe ali prihodnje nacionalno pravo držav članic, ki zadeva običajni insolvenčni postopek in v katerem je zajeta razvrstitev vlog v primeru insolventnosti, kolikor ta razvrstitev ni harmonizirana z Direktivo 2014/59/EU, ne glede na datum njihovega vplačila.
This Directive should not prevent Member States from providing that this Directive should continue to apply when the issuing entities are no longer subject to the Union recovery and resolution framework because of, in particular, the divestment of their credit or investment activities to a third party.
Komisija bi morala do 29. decembra 2020 pregledati uporabo Direktive 2014/59/EU z vidika razvrstitve vlog v primeru insolventnosti in zlasti oceniti potrebo po morebitnih nadaljnjih spremembah Direktive.
This Directive harmonises the ranking under normal insolvency proceedings of unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments and does not cover the insolvency ranking of deposits beyond the existing applicable provisions of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Da bi zagotovili pravno varnost za trge in posamezne institucije ter omogočili učinkovito uporabo instrumenta za reševanje s sredstvi upnikov, bi morala ta direktiva začeti veljati dan po objavi –