natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The formulation of corrective measures shall be sufficiently specific to allow a SIPS operator to undertake action without undue delay to remedy or avoid a repetition of its non-compliance.
Korektivni ukrepi se določijo dovolj natančno, da lahko upravljavec SPPS brez odlašanja ukrepa, da odpravi neskladnost ali prepreči ponovitev neskladnosti.
Notice to the SIPS operator
Obvestilo upravljavcu SPPS
In accordance with Article 22(1) of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) and based on the findings of a draft assessment or an assessment, the competent authority shall give written notice to a SIPS operator which may include requesting additional information or explanations to be provided.
Pristojni organ v skladu s členom 22(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) in na podlagi ugotovitev osnutka ocene ali ocene upravljavcu SPPS pošlje pisno obvestilo, ki lahko vsebuje zahtevo za dodatne informacije ali pojasnila.
The written notice shall specify the nature of the non-compliance or suspected non-compliance, as well as the facts, information, assessments or legal grounds supporting the finding of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance.
V pisnem obvestilu se navede, za kakšno neskladnost ali domnevno neskladnost gre, ter dejstva, informacije, ocene in pravna podlaga, na katerih temelji ugotovitev neskladnosti ali domnevne neskladnosti.
It shall state the corrective measure(s) that the competent authority considers imposing.
V njem se navedejo korektivni ukrepi, ki jih namerava pristojni organ naložiti.
It shall further state whether the case is considered serious and whether immediate action is required under Article 4(2).
V njem se tudi navede, ali je bilo presojeno, da je primer resen, in ali je potrebno takojšnje ukrepanje v skladu s členom 4(2).
For cases of ongoing non-compliance, the written notice shall also specify the lack of progress or inadequacy of the progress made by the SIPS operator with regard to the implementation of the action plan agreed with the competent authority.
V primeru neodpravljene neskladnosti se v pisnem obvestilu navede tudi pomanjkanje napredka ali neustreznost napredka upravljavca SPPS pri izvajanju akcijskega načrta, dogovorjenega s pristojnim organom.
Organisation of the hearing phase
Organizacija faze izjavljanja
A SIPS operator shall be given the opportunity to be heard through commenting in writing on the facts, information, assessment or legal grounds supporting the finding of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance, and the corrective measure(s) being considered, as set out in the written notice, within a time limit specified by the competent authority of a minimum of 14 calendar days following receipt of the written notice.
Upravljavcu SPPS se da možnost, da se v roku, ki ga določi pristojni organ in ni krajši kot 14 koledarskih dni od prejema pisnega obvestila, izjavi tako, da predloži pisne pripombe k dejstvom, informacijam, oceni in pravni podlagi, na katerih temelji ugotovitev neskladnosti ali domnevne neskladnosti, ter k nameravanim korektivnim ukrepom, kakor so navedeni v pisnem obvestilu.
A SIPS operator may request an extension of the time limit and the competent authority shall have discretion to decide whether an extension is granted.
Upravljavec SPPS lahko zaprosi za podaljšanje roka in pristojni organ po prostem preudarku odloči, ali podaljšanje odobri.
In relation to non-compliance that is considered serious enough to require immediate action, in accordance with Article 22(3) of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28), a SIPS operator shall be given the opportunity to be heard and provide explanations within a time limit, specified by the competent authority, which shall typically not exceed three business days following receipt of the written notice.
Pri neskladnosti, za katero se v skladu s členom 22(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) presodi, da je dovolj resna, da zahteva takojšnje ukrepanje, se da upravljavcu SPPS možnost, da se izjavi in da pojasnila v roku, ki ga določi pristojni organ in običajno ni daljši kot tri delovne dni od prejema pisnega obvestila.
A SIPS operator may request the provision of explanation or documents from the competent authority concerning the non-compliance or suspected non-compliance.
Upravljavec SPPS lahko zahteva, da mu pristojni organ predloži pojasnila ali dokumente v zvezi z neskladnostjo ali domnevno neskladnostjo.
Competent authorities shall endeavour to provide the relevant explanations or documents to SIPS operators in a timely manner.
Pristojni organi si prizadevajo, da ustrezna pojasnila ali dokumente pravočasno predložijo upravljavcem SPPS.
If the competent authority deems it appropriate or at the request of the SIPS operator, the SIPS operator may be given the opportunity to comment on the facts, information, assessment or legal grounds supporting the finding of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance in a meeting.
Če pristojni organ meni, da je to primerno, ali če za to zaprosi upravljavec SPPS, se upravljavcu SPPS lahko da možnost, da pripombe k dejstvom, informacijam, oceni in pravni podlagi, na katerih temelji ugotovitev neskladnosti ali domnevne neskladnosti, da na sestanku.
The SIPS operator may be supported in the meeting by a third party, including external legal counsel.
Upravljavcu SPPS lahko na sestanku pomaga tretja oseba, vključno z zunanjim pravnim svetovalcem.
The competent authority shall prepare written minutes of any meeting with a SIPS operator.
Pristojni organ pripravi zapisnik vsakega sestanka z upravljavcem SPPS.
After having been given sufficient time to review the minutes and include any remarks or changes deemed necessary, the SIPS operator shall sign the minutes and the competent authority shall provide the SIPS operator with a copy of them.
Potem ko se upravljavcu SPPS zagotovi dovolj časa za pregled zapisnika in vnos morebitnih pripomb ali sprememb, ki jih šteje za potrebne, upravljavec SPPS zapisnik podpiše in pristojni organ mu da kopijo zapisnika.
A SIPS operator shall provide comments, documentation, explanations and any other information to the competent authority in the Union language chosen by the SIPS operator, unless another language for communications is agreed in advance with the competent authority.
Upravljavec SPPS predloži pripombe, dokumentacijo, pojasnila in druge informacije pristojnemu organu v uradnem jeziku Unije, ki ga sam izbere, razen če se je predhodno s pristojnim organom dogovoril za drug jezik za komuniciranje.
SIPS operators shall be entitled, after the initiation of the procedure for the imposition of corrective measures, to have access to the competent authority's file, subject to the legitimate interest of legal and natural persons other than the SIPS operators themselves.
Upravljavci SPPS so po začetku postopka za naložitev korektivnih ukrepov upravičeni do dostopa do spisa pristojnega organa, ob upoštevanju upravičenih interesov pravnih in fizičnih oseb razen samega upravljavca SPPS.
The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information.
Pravica dostopa do spisa ne zajema zaupnih informacij.
The SIPS operators shall forward to the competent authority, without undue delay, any request related to access to the file.
Upravljavci SPPS vse zahteve v zvezi z dostopom do spisa brez odlašanja posredujejo pristojnemu organu.
The file consists of all of the documents obtained, produced or assembled by the competent authority during the procedure for the imposition of corrective measures.
Spis obsega vse dokumente, ki jih je pristojni organ pridobil, sestavil ali zbral med postopkom za naložitev korektivnih ukrepov.
For the purpose of this Article, confidential information may include internal documents of the competent authority and correspondence between the competent authority and any persons involved in preparing the assessment.
Za potrebe tega člena zaupne informacije lahko vključujejo notranje dokumente pristojnega organa ter korespondenco med pristojnim organom in vsemi osebami, ki sodelujejo pri pripravi ocene.
Imposition of corrective measures
Naložitev korektivnih ukrepov
In accordance with Article 22(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28), the competent authority may impose corrective measures on a SIPS operator, after taking into account the information provided by the latter.
Pristojni organ lahko v skladu s členom 22(2) in (3) Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) upravljavcu SPPS naloži korektivne ukrepe, potem ko upošteva informacije, ki jih predloži upravljavec SPPS.
For the avoidance of doubt, where the procedure to impose a corrective measure has been initiated on the basis of suspected non-compliance, a corrective measure shall be imposed only after the relevant decision-making body of the competent authority has endorsed the report identifying non-compliance.
Da ne bi bilo dvoma, kadar se postopek za naložitev korektivnega ukrepa začne na podlagi domnevne neskladnosti, se korektivni ukrep naloži šele potem, ko ustrezni organ odločanja pristojnega organa odobri poročilo, v katerem se ugotavlja neskladnost.
Where the ECB acts as a competent authority, a decision to impose corrective measures shall be endorsed by the Governing Council.
Kadar je v vlogi pristojnega organa ECB, odločitev o naložitvi korektivnih ukrepov odobri Svet ECB.
The decision shall specify the time limit within which the SIPS operator has to implement the corrective measures.
V odločitvi se določi rok, v katerem mora upravljavec SPPS izvesti korektivne ukrepe.
Where an NCB acts as a competent authority, a decision to impose corrective measures shall be endorsed by the NCB's decision-making body.
Kadar je v vlogi pristojnega organa NCB, odločitev o naložitvi korektivnih ukrepov odobri organ odločanja te NCB.
The NCB shall submit a copy of the decision to the Governing Council for information without undue delay.
NCB brez odlašanja predloži kopijo odločitve v vednost Svetu ECB.
The right of a competent authority to impose corrective measures in respect of non-compliance that has been confirmed in an assessment shall expire two years after the finalisation of this assessment.
Pravica pristojnega organa, da naloži korektivne ukrepe zaradi neskladnosti, ki jo je potrdila ocena, zastara dve leti po dokončanju te ocene.
Notification of the decision to impose corrective measures
Uradno obvestilo o odločitvi o naložitvi korektivnih ukrepov
The competent authority shall notify a SIPS operator in writing, including electronically, of any decision to impose corrective measures within seven calendar days of taking the decision.
Pristojni organ o odločitvi o naložitvi korektivnih ukrepov pisno, lahko v elektronski obliki, uradno obvesti upravljavca SPPS v sedmih dneh po sprejetju te odločitve.
Failure to implement corrective measures
Neizvedba korektivnih ukrepov
A failure by a SIPS operator to implement corrective measures within the indicated time limit may be treated as a separate ground for the imposition of a sanction by the ECB, provided that a sanction has not already been imposed for the same infringement.
Če upravljavec SPPS ne izvede korektivnih ukrepov v postavljenem roku, je to lahko samostojen razlog za naložitev sankcije ECB, razen če je že bila naložena sankcija za isto kršitev.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 3 November 2017.
V Frankfurtu na Majni, 3. novembra 2017
OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 16.
UL L 217, 23.7.2014, str. 16.
Decision (EU) 2017/2097 of the European Central Bank
Sklep Evropske centralne banke (EU) 2017/2097
on the methodology for calculating sanctions for infringements of the oversight requirements for systemically important payment systems (ECB/2017/35)
o metodologiji za izračun sankcij za kršitve pregledniških zahtev za sistemsko pomembne plačilne sisteme (ECB/2017/35)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the fourth indent of Article 127(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti četrte alinee člena 127(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular the fourth indent of Article 3.1, and Article 34 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke ter zlasti četrte alinee člena 3.1 in člena 34 Statuta,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 of 23 November 1998 concerning the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions [1], and in particular Article 2 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2532/98 z dne 23. novembra 1998 o pooblastilih Evropske centralne banke za nalaganje sankcij [1] in zlasti člena 2 Uredbe,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 of the European Central Bank of 3 July 2014 on oversight requirements for systemically important payment systems (ECB/2014/28) [3], and in particular Article 23 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropske centralne banke (EU) št. 795/2014 z dne 3. julija 2014 o pregledniških zahtevah za sistemsko pomembne plačilne sisteme (ECB/2014/28) [3] in zlasti člena 23 Uredbe,
The Eurosystem promotes the smooth operation of payment systems by, among other things, conducting oversight.
Eurosistem podpira nemoteno delovanje plačilnih sistemov med drugim z opravljanjem pregleda.
In particular, oversight of systemically important payments systems (SIPS) is conducted pursuant to the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28).
Pregled sistemsko pomembnih plačilnih sistemov (SPPS) se opravlja na podlagi zahtev Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28).
Article 23 of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) empowers the European Central Bank (ECB) to impose sanctions for infringements of that Regulation.
Člen 23 Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) pooblašča Evropsko centralno banko (ECB) za nalaganje sankcij za kršitve navedene uredbe.
For the purposes of enhancing the transparency of the principles and procedures that the ECB will follow when imposing such sanctions, that Article requires the ECB to adopt a decision on the methodology for the calculation of the amount of the sanctions.
Zaradi večje preglednosti načel in postopkov, ki jih bo ECB uporabljala pri nalaganju takih sankcij, navedeni člen zahteva, da ECB sprejme sklep o metodologiji za izračun zneskov sankcij.
By adopting this Decision, the ECB demonstrates the manner in which it is guided by the principle of proportionality when determining an appropriate sanction,
S sprejetjem tega sklepa ECB prikazuje, kako pri določanju ustreznih sankcij upošteva načelo sorazmernosti –
‘business year’ means the period of time in connection with which audited or statutory accounts of the SIPS operator are to be prepared;
„poslovno leto“ pomeni obdobje, za katero je treba pripraviti revidirane ali obvezne računovodske izkaze upravljavca SPPS;
‘fine’ means a single amount of money that a SIPS operator is obliged to pay as a sanction;
„globa“ pomeni enkratni denarni znesek, ki ga mora upravljavec SPPS plačati kot sankcijo;
‘infringement’ means any failure by a SIPS operator to fulfil any obligation arising from Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28);
„kršitev“ pomeni vsako neizpolnjevanje obveznosti iz Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) s strani upravljavca SPPS;
‘periodic penalty payments’ means amounts of money that, in the event of a continued infringement, a SIPS operator is obliged to pay, either as a punishment or with a view to forcing the SIPS operator concerned to comply with its obligations under Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28).
„periodične denarne kazni“ pomenijo denarne zneske, ki jih mora upravljavec SPPS v primeru trajajoče kršitve plačati kot kazen ali za to, da bi upravljavca SPPS prisilili k izpolnjevanju obveznosti iz Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28).
These amounts shall be calculated for each complete day of continued infringement following notification to the SIPS operator of a decision requiring the termination of the infringement in accordance with the procedure laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2532/98;
Ti zneski se izračunajo za vsak cel dan trajajoče kršitve po tem, ko je bil upravljavec SPPS uradno obveščen o odločitvi, s katero se zahteva prenehanje kršitve, v skladu s postopkom, določenim v drugem pododstavku člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 2532/98;
‘sanction’ means a fine or periodic penalty payments imposed as a consequence of an infringement;
„sankcija“ pomeni globo ali periodične denarne kazni, ki se naložijo zaradi kršitve;
‘turnover’ means the revenue generated by the SIPS concerned during the business year preceding that in which the infringement occurred;
„promet“ pomeni prihodke, ki jih je zadevni SPPS ustvaril v poslovnem letu pred poslovnim letom, v katerem je prišlo do kršitve;
‘value of payments processed’ means the total daily average value of euro-denominated payments processed by the SIPS concerned during the business year preceding that in which the infringement occurred.
„vrednost obdelanih plačil“ pomeni povprečno skupno dnevno vrednost plačil, denominiranih v eurih, ki jih je zadevni SPPS obdelal v poslovnem letu pred poslovnim letom, v katerem je prišlo do kršitve.
This Decision sets out the methodology to be followed by the ECB in calculating the amount of sanctions to be imposed by the ECB on a SIPS operator for infringements of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28).
Ta sklep določa metodologijo, ki jo ECB uporabi pri izračunu zneskov sankcij, ki jih naloži upravljavcu SPPS za kršitve Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28).
The ECB may impose either a fine or periodic penalty payments as a sanction for infringement of Regulation (EU) No 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28).
ECB lahko kot sankcijo za kršitev Uredbe (EU) št. 795/2014 (ECB/2014/28) naloži globo ali periodične denarne kazni.
The ECB shall determine the amount of the sanction to be imposed based on a two-stage process, starting with the calculation of the baseline amount of the sanction, which may then be increased or reduced in the light of aggravating or mitigating circumstances of relevance to each specific case.
ECB določi znesek sankcije, ki se naloži, po dvostopenjskem postopku, v katerem najprej izračuna osnovni znesek sankcije, nato pa ga lahko zviša ali zniža glede na relevantne obteževalne ali olajševalne okoliščine posameznega primera.
Calculation of the baseline amount of a sanction
Izračun osnovnega zneska sankcije
The ECB shall calculate the baseline amount of any sanction to be imposed on a SIPS operator by reference to the turnover and the value of payments processed by the SIPS concerned.
ECB izračuna osnovni znesek sankcije, ki se naloži upravljavcu SPPS, glede na promet in vrednost obdelanih plačil v zadevnem SPPS.
The baseline amount of the sanction shall represent 50 % of the sum of the following amounts:
Osnovni znesek sankcije znaša 50 % vsote naslednjih zneskov:
1 % of turnover; and
1 % prometa in
0,0001 % of the value of payments processed.
0,0001 % vrednosti obdelanih plačil.
For periodic penalty payments, the baseline amount shall be divided by 180 to calculate the amount payable for each complete day of continued infringement.
Pri periodičnih denarnih kaznih se znesek, ki ga je treba plačati za vsak cel dan trajajoče kršitve, izračuna tako, da se osnovni znesek deli s 180.
Aggravating and mitigating circumstances
Obteževalne in olajševalne okoliščine
When calculating the amount of any sanction, the ECB shall take into consideration, where relevant, the circumstances of the specific case, as provided for in Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2532/98.
Kadar je to relevantno, ECB pri izračunu zneska sankcije upošteva okoliščine posameznega primera, kakor je določeno v členu 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2532/98.
Where, based on the calculation made pursuant to Article 3(2) and any increase or decrease in the baseline amount made pursuant to Article 4, the amount of any fine exceeds EUR 500000, the amount of the fine the ECB may impose shall be capped at EUR 500000.
Kadar znesek globe na podlagi izračuna v skladu s členom 3(2) in zvišanja ali znižanja osnovnega zneska v skladu s členom 4 preseže 500000 EUR, se znesek globe, ki jo lahko ECB naloži, omeji na 500000 EUR.
Where, based on the calculation made pursuant to Article 3(2) and (3) and any increase or decrease in the baseline amount made pursuant to Article 4, the amount of the periodic penalty payments exceed EUR 10000 per day of infringement, the amount of the periodic penalty payments the ECB may impose per day of infringement shall be capped at EUR 10000.
Kadar znesek periodičnih denarnih kazni na podlagi izračuna v skladu s členom 3(2) in (3) ter zvišanja ali znižanja osnovnega zneska v skladu s členom 4 preseže 10000 EUR za vsak dan kršitve, se znesek periodičnih denarnih kazni, ki jih lahko ECB naloži za vsak dan kršitve, omeji na 10000 EUR.
Periodic penalty payments may be imposed in respect of a maximum period of six months following the notification to the SIPS operator of the decision to impose sanctions.
Periodične denarne kazni se lahko naložijo največ za obdobje šestih mesecev po tem, ko je bil upravljavec SPPS uradno obveščen o odločitvi o naložitvi sankcij.
Decision (EU) 2017/2239 of the European Central Bank
Sklep Evropske centralne banke (EU) 2017/2239
of 16 November 2017
z dne 16. novembra 2017
amending Decision (EU) 2016/2247 on the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB/2017/36)
o spremembi Sklepa (EU) 2016/2247 o letnih računovodskih izkazih Evropske centralne banke (ECB/2017/36)
Decision (EU) 2016/2247 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2016/35) [1] lays down the rules for drawing up the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB).
Sklep Evropske centralne banke (EU) 2016/2247 (ECB/2016/35) [1] določa pravila za pripravo letnih računovodskih izkazov Evropske centralne banke (ECB).
The financial reporting framework of the ECB needs to be clarified to ensure that its financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Okvir za finančno poročanje ECB je treba pojasniti, da se zagotovi, da se bodo njeni računovodski izkazi predstavljali v skladu s splošno sprejetimi revizijskimi standardi.
Therefore, Decision (EU) 2016/2247 (ECB/2016/35) should be amended accordingly,
Zato je treba Sklep (EU) 2016/2247 (ECB/2016/35) ustrezno spremeniti –
Decision (EU) 2016/2247 (ECB/2016/35) is amended as follows:
Sklep (EU) 2016/2247 (ECB/2016/35) se spremeni:
in Article 25, the following paragraph 3 is added:
v členu 25 se doda naslednji odstavek 3:
In extremely rare circumstances where the Governing Council concludes that compliance with a requirement of this Decision would not result in a fair presentation of the annual accounts, the ECB shall depart from that requirement and shall provide the reasons in the notes to the annual accounts.’;
V izredno redkih primerih, kadar Svet ECB ugotovi, da zaradi izpolnitve zahteve iz tega sklepa letni računovodski izkazi ne bi bili pošteno predstavljeni, ECB te zahteve ne izpolni in to obrazloži v pojasnilih k letnim računovodskim izkazom.“;
Annex I is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga I se nadomesti s Prilogo k temu sklepu.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 16 November 2017.
V Frankfurtu na Majni, 16. novembra 2017
Decision (EU) 2016/2247 of the European Central Bank of 3 November 2016 on the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB/2016/35) (OJ L 347, 20.12.2016, p. 1).
Sklep Evropske centralne banke (EU) 2016/2247 z dne 3. novembra 2016 o letnih računovodskih izkazih Evropske centralne banke (ECB/2016/35) (UL L 347, 20.12.2016, str. 1).
Annex I to Decision (EU) 2016/2247 (ECB/2016/35) is replaced by the following:
Priloga I k Sklepu (EU) 2016/2247 (ECB/2016/35) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The No 2 account of the IMF (euro account for administrative expenses) may be included in this item or under the item “Liabilities to non-euro-area residents denominated in euro”
Račun št. 2 MDS (račun za upravne stroške v eurih) se lahko vključi v to postavko ali v postavko ‚obveznosti do rezidentov zunaj euroobmočja, denominirane v eurih‘
Balances with banks outside the euro area other than those under asset item 11.3 “Other financial assets”
Stanja pri bankah zunaj euroobmočja, razen tistih v postavki sredstev 11.3 ‚druga finančna sredstva‘