natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, the evidence of the file summarized in recitals (19) to (23) on its own does not support such a claim.
Sklep o škodi
This claim is therefore rejected.
Ker ni bilo dodatnih pripomb glede škode za industrijo Unije, se začasne ugotovitve in sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 70 do 95 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Conclusion on injury
F. VZROČNA ZVEZA
In the absence of any additional comments with regard to injury to the Union industry, the provisional findings and conclusions set out in recitals (70) to (95) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Učinek dampinškega uvoza
F. CAUSATION
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede učinka dampinškega uvoza na gospodarski položaj industrije Unije, se ugotovitve in sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 97 do 100 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Effect of dumped imports
Učinek drugih dejavnikov
In the absence of any comments with regard to the effect of dumped imports on the economic situation of the Union industry, the findings and conclusions set out in recitals (97) to (100) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Izvoz industrije Unije
Effect of other factors
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede izvoza industrije Unije, se sklep iz uvodne izjave 101 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Export performance of the Union industry
Prodaja povezanim strankam
In the absence of any comments with regard to export performance of the Union industry, the conclusion set out in recital (101) of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede prodaje povezanim strankam, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 102 in 103 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Sales to related parties
Uvoz iz tretjih držav
In the absence any comments with regard to the sales to related parties, the conclusions set out in recitals (102) to (103) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Popravljene informacije iz preglednic v uvodni izjavi 103 začasne uredbe so naslednje:
The revised information presented in the tables, as set out in recital (103) of the provisional Regulation, is as follows:
Norveška
Norway
povprečna cena (v EUR na tono)
Average price (EUR/tonne)
Turčija
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ukrajina
Turkey
povprečna cena
Ukraine
Preostali del sveta
Average price
Popravek zgornjih podatkov ni vplival na ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 104 začasne uredbe.
Rest of the World
V obravnavanem obdobju so bile cene uvoza iz tretjih držav v povprečju dejansko vedno višje od cen industrije Unije.
The correction of the figures above did not have any impact on the findings in recital (104) of the provisional Regulation.
Edina država izvoznica, ki je imela v OP nižje povprečne cene kot industrija Unije, je bila Belorusija, in sicer v letu, ko je obseg uvoza iz Belorusije najhitreje naraščal.
Indeed, throughout the period considered the prices of imports from the third countries were on average always higher than the prices of the Union industry.
Zato se ugotovitve Komisije iz uvodne izjave 104 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The only exporting country with lower average prices than the Union industry was Belarus in the IP which was the same year when volumes of imports from Belarus increased most rapidly.
V zvezi z uvozom iz tretjih držav se beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik ni strinjal s sklepom Komisije, da so se posamezni tržni deleži tretjih držav razen Ukrajine le malo povečali.
Therefore the Commission's findings in recital (104) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik je v podporo svojemu mnenju priložil statistične podatke o uvozu za leto 2016, tj. za obdobje, ki sledi OP.
With regard to the imports from third countries, the Belarusian exporting producer did not agree with the Commission's conclusion that individual market shares of third countries, with exception of Ukraine's, had increased only marginally.
Poleg tega je opozoril na domnevno neskladje med podatki o uvozu iz preglednice 6.3.3 začasne uredbe in razpoložljivimi statističnimi podatki Eurostata.
The Belarusian exporting producer supported its opinion with imports statistics for the year 2016, which is a period subsequent to the IP.
V odgovor na to trditev je treba najprej opozoriti, da se trendi in podatki za obdobje po OP ponavadi ne upoštevajo pri analizi škode in vzročne zveze.
Furthermore, it pointed out to an alleged discrepancy between the import figures reported in table 6.3.3 of the provisional Regulation and available Eurostat statistics.
Komisija se je v uvodni izjavi 111 začasne uredbe sicer strinjala, da se zberejo in pregledajo nekateri podatki o obdobju po OP, vendar je bilo to v okviru trditev v zvezi z vplivom t. i. „sheme goljufanja na področju DDV“, domnevne naknadne vrzeli med povpraševanjem in ponudbo zadevnega izdelka na trgih na Poljskem in v baltskih državah ter neobičajno visokih ravni obsega izvoza iz Belorusije v OP, ki je domnevno posledica navedene sheme.
In response to this claim, it should first be noted that post IP trends and data are normally not taken into account in the injury and causation analysis.
Drugič, Komisija svojih ugotovitev glede učinkov uvoza iz tretjih držav ne more utemeljiti s podatki za obdobje po OP, ki jih je predstavila zainteresirana stran, saj naj bi analizirala samo trende v obravnavanem obdobju (2012–2015), o katerih je zbirala informacije med preiskavo.
While the Commission agreed in the recital (111) of the provisional Regulation to collect and review certain post IP data, it was undertaken in the context of the claims concerning the impact of so called ‘VAT fraud scheme’, the alleged subsequent gap between demand and supply of the product concerned on the markets of Poland and the Baltic States, and the abnormally high level of IP export volumes from Belarus allegedly resulting from that scheme.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 39, je Komisija v tej preiskavi v omejenem obsegu ocenila podatke za obdobje po OP, in sicer zaradi obravnave izjemnih okoliščin, tj. sheme goljufanja na področju DDV.
Secondly, the Commission cannot base its finding concerning the effects of imports from third countries on post IP import figures presented by the interested party, since it should only analyse trends observed during the period considered (2012-2015), and on which it collected information during the investigation.
Zato so se potrdile ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 104 začasne uredbe, ki se nanašajo na spremembe tržnih deležev tretjih držav v obravnavanem obdobju, ki se je izteklo leta 2015.
As explained in recital (39), in this investigation, the Commission assessed limited post IP data to address an exceptional situation, that is, the VAT fraud scheme.
Tudi če bi se upoštevalo gibanje uvoza iz tretjih držav po OP, se sklep Komisije o morebitnem učinku tega uvoza na položaj industrije Unije ne bi spremenil, saj so bile te cene višje od cen uvoza iz Belorusije.
Thus, the findings of recital (104) of the provisional Regulation which relate to changes of market shares of third countries during the period under consideration, which ends in 2015, were confirmed.
Kar zadeva domnevno neskladje med podatki o uvozu iz začasne uredbe in statističnimi podatki Eurostata, je treba opozoriti, da statistični podatki vključujejo tudi obseg uvoza tako imenovanih palic z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti, ki ne spadajo v obsega izdelka v okviru tega postopka in niso navedeni v preglednici 6.3.3 začasne uredbe [6].
Even if the development of imports from third countries after IP were taken into account, it would not change the Commission's conclusion on the potential impact of these imports on the situation of the Union industry, as those prices remained higher than prices of imports from Belarus.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se trditve beloruskega proizvajalca izvoznika v zvezi z učinkom uvoza iz tretjih držav zavrnejo.
Finally, with regard to the alleged discrepancy between the import figures reported in the provisional Regulation and Eurostat statistics, it should be noted that the latter statistics include also import volumes of so-called high fatigue performance bars which are not part of the product scope of this procedure and were not reported in table 6.3.3 of the provisional Regulation [6].
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede uvoza iz tretjih držav, se sklepi iz uvodne izjave 104 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Taking into account the above, the claims of the Belarussian exporting producer concerning the impact of third countries' imports are rejected.
Razvoj stroškov
In the absence of other comments with regard to the imports from third countries, the conclusions set out in recital (104) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede razvoja stroškov, se sklep iz uvodne izjave 105 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Costs evolution
Učinek tako imenovane „sheme goljufanja na področju DDV“
In the absence of any comments with regard to the costs evolution, the conclusion set out in recital (105) of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik je v predloženih pripombah ponovil pripombe iz začasne faze preiskave v zvezi z učinkom t. i. sheme goljufanja na področju DDV na trg Unije ter trdil, da Komisija ni opravila svoje naloge, da preišče zadevo.
Impact of the so-called ‘VAT fraud scheme’
Po njegovih trditvah je bila ta shema glavni razlog za finančne težave nekaterih proizvajalcev v Uniji.
The Belarusian exporting producer reiterated in its submission the comments made at the provisional stage of the investigation with regard to the impact of the so-called VAT fraud scheme on the Union market, and claimed the Commission had failed to discharge its duty of investigating the matter.
Zaradi te sheme goljufanja sta dva proizvajalca iz Latvije (v začetku leta 2013) in na Slovaškem (proti koncu leta 2014) razglasila stečaj in zaustavila proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka.
According to the exporting producer, this scheme was the main reason for the financial difficulties of some Union producers.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec v Uniji, tj. na Poljskem, leta 2014 za tri mesece zaustavil proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka zaradi nadgradnje strojev.
As a result of this fraud scheme two producers located in Latvia (in early 2013) and Slovakia (in late 2014) went bankrupt and stopped production of the like product.
Vse to je skupaj od leta 2013 naprej domnevno privedlo do pomanjkanja oskrbe predvsem na poljskem in baltskem trgu.
Furthermore, one Union producer in Poland stopped the production of the like product for 3 months in 2014 due to upgrading its machinery.
To domnevno vrzel naj bi zapolnil izvoz iz Belorusije.
All these events together allegedly led to a shortage of supply mainly on the Polish and on the Baltic markets from 2013 onwards.
Beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil tudi, da je bilo leto 2015 (OP) zaradi sheme DDV „neobičajno“ v smislu velikega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo ter da se je obseg izvoza začel zmanjševati že proti koncu OP, po OP pa se je še naprej zmanjševal.
This alleged gap would have been filled by the Belarusian exports.
V odgovor na te trditve je Komisija najprej proučila podatke o izvozu, ki jih je predložil beloruski statistični urad, pri čemer je prišla do naslednjih ugotovitev.
The Belarusian exporting producer further claimed that, because of the VAT scheme, the year 2015 (IP) was an ‘unusual year’ in terms of high volumes of the product concerned exported to the Union and that export volumes started to decrease already at the end of the IP and continued decreasing after the IP.
Povečanje količine izvoza s strani proizvajalca izvoznika v Unijo je bilo povezano z zmanjšanjem količine izvoza s strani proizvajalca izvoznika na ruski trg.
In response to these claims, the Commission first looked into the exports data provided by the Belarusian statistics office and noted the following.
Kot je razvidno iz spodnje preglednice, je beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik med letoma 2013 in 2015 znatno zmanjšal prodajo v Rusijo, in sicer za približno 370000 ton, prodajo na trg Unije pa povečal za približno enako količino, tj. 380000 ton.
The increase in the volume of exports by the exporting producer to the Union correlated with the decrease in the volume exports of the exporting producer to the Russian market.
Vir: povzetek podatkov beloruskega statističnega urada.
As described in the table below, between 2013 and 2015, the Belarusian exporting producer decreased its sales to Russia significantly by around 370000 tonnes and increased its sales to the Union market by approximately the same amount, i.e. 380000 tonnes.
Celotni izvoz
Source: Extracts from the Belarus statistics office.
Indeks (2012 = 100)
Total exports sales
Izvoz v Rusijo
Index 2012 = 100
Celotni izvoz v EU
Exports to Russia
Izvoz v baltske države
Total exports to EU
Izvoz na Poljsko
Exports to Baltic States
Izvoz v druge države članice
Exports to Poland
Drugič, Komisija je proučila razmere na poljskem in baltskem trgu.
Exports to Other Member States
Leta 2013 sta se poljski trg in trg baltskih držav soočala z manjšo proizvodnjo enega od poljskih proizvajalcev in zaustavitvijo proizvodnje enega od latvijskih proizvajalcev.
Concerning 2013, Polish and Baltic states' markets were faced with the decrease of production of one Polish producer and the stop of production of one Latvian producer.
V letu 2014 je eden od poljskih proizvajalcev za tri mesece zaustavil proizvodnjo, da bi nadgradil stroje, eden od slovaških proizvajalcev pa je avgusta 2014 dokončno zaustavil proizvodnjo (družba je februarja 2015 razglasila stečaj).
Moreover, from 1 October 2013 the Polish government applied reverse charge VAT mechanisms to some 40 steel products, from fencing and pipes to finished flat-steel products as well as rebars, and thus tackling the VAT fraud scheme.
Količina, ki zaradi tega ni bila na voljo, se ocenjuje na približno 133000 ton.
The analysis of the export sales from Belarus to the Union market showed that the Belarusian exporting producer sales to Poland and the Baltic States remained stable, at around 110000 tonnes compared with 2012.
Analiza izvoza iz Belorusije na trg Unije je pokazala, da se je prodaja s strani beloruskega proizvajalca izvoznika na Poljsko in v baltske države dejansko povečala za približno 75000 ton.
Therefore it is concluded that the Belarusian exporting producer did not take advantage of the alleged shortage of supply by the Union production in 2013 and that the other Union producers present in the market were able to supply the market either from stocks or by re-directing export sales to these markets [7].
Vendar je proizvajalec izvoznik povečal tudi prodajo na druge trge Unije, na primer v Nemčijo, in sicer s praktično zanemarljivih količin na približno 120000 ton.
Concerning 2014, one Polish producer stopped production for one quarter in order to upgrade its machinery and one Slovak producer stopped its production in August 2014 (the company was declared in bankruptcy in February 2015).
Zato se trditev, da je beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik prodajo na trg Unije povečal samo zaradi izjemnih okoliščin na Poljskem in v baltskih državah, zavrne, saj je povečal tudi prodajo (celo z višjimi cenami) na druge dele trga Unije, na katerih ni bilo izjemnih okoliščin.
The analysis of the export sales from Belarus to the Union market showed that the Belarusian exporting producer sales to Poland and the Baltic States indeed increased by around 75000 tonnes.
Zato se sklene, da povečanje izvoza iz Belorusije v Evropsko unijo ni bilo posledica vrzeli med povpraševanjem in ponudbo na trgu Unije, ampak preusmeritve količin, ki niso bile izvožene na ruski trg.
Therefore the argument that the Belarusian exporting producer increased its sales to the Union market only because of the exceptional market situation in Poland and the Baltic states is rejected, as it also increased (at even higher pace) its sales to other parts of the Union market where no exceptional circumstances existed.
V skladu z uvodno izjavo 111 začasne uredbe je Komisija ocenila količino uvoza po OP.
Concerning the investigation period, the Latvian producer re-opened in March 2015.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede sheme goljufanja na področju DDV in razvoja dogodkov v obdobju po OP, se ugotovitve in sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 106 do 111 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The Polish production was back to normal.
Sklep o vzročni zvezi
Despite this, the Belarusian exporting producer increased its sales to Poland even further and it maintained its sales to the Baltic States compared to 2014.
Sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 112 do 115 začasne uredbe se zato potrdijo.
Moreover the sharpest increase took place on other parts of the Union market (mainly in Bulgaria, the Netherlands, and Germany).
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bil edini dejavnik, ki bi lahko vplival na položaj industrije Unije, uvoz iz tretjih držav, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 104 začasne uredbe.
Therefore, it is concluded that the increase of the Belarusian exports to the European Union was not due to the gap between demand and supply in the Union market but to the redirection of the volume lost on the Russian market.
Vendar je sklenila, da ta uvoz ni mogel prekiniti vzročne zveze med dampinškim uvozom iz Rusije in znatno škodo, ki je bila ugotovljena za industrijo Unije, ter da je dampinški uvoz iz Belorusije ostal glavni vzrok škode.
Thus, the claim of inadequate assessment of the impact of the VAT fraud scheme in the provisional determination is unfounded and is, therefore, rejected.
Na podlagi zgornje analize, pri kateri so bili učinki vseh znanih dejavnikov na položaj industrije Unije prepoznani in ločeni od škodljivih učinkov dampinškega uvoza, se sklene, da je dampinški uvoz iz Belorusije povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with recital (111) of the provisional Regulation the Commission assessed the volume imports after the investigation period.
G. INTERES UNIJE
The data showed that the imports from Belarus decreased somewhat, but they were still well above the 2013 levels and more or less at 2014 levels.
Interes industrije Unije
Therefore the argument that the increase of imports from Belarus was temporary in nature and was explained by the particular market situation on certain Union market segments is rejected.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede interesa industrije Unije, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 117 do 122 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of other comments with regard to the VAT fraud scheme and post IP developments, the findings and conclusions set out in recitals (106) to (111) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Interes uporabnikov in uvoznikov
Conclusion on causation
Beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik je v predloženih pripombah trdil, da Komisija pri presoji interesa Unije ni upoštevala posebnih težav uvoznikov in uporabnikov v baltskih državah.
In summary, the Commission considers that none of the arguments put forward by the interested parties after the provisional disclosure were able to alter the provisional findings which established a causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry during the IP.
Trdil je, da je zaradi logističnih razlogov (na primer železniških povezav ali zahtev glede potrdil) Belorusija edini vir dobave armaturnih palic za te družbe.
Thus, the conclusions set out in recitals (112) to (115) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija potrdila, da je imel edini sodelujoči uporabnik iz baltskih držav določene tehnične težave z dobavo od proizvajalcev v Uniji (nobeden od njih ni v baltskih državah).
The Commission has found that the only other factor that may have had an impact on the situation of the Union industry was imports from third countries, as stated in the recital (104) of the provisional Regulation.
Po drugi strani pa je ta družba navedla, da bi se uvoz iz Belorusije lahko nadomestil z uvozom iz Rusije, v določeni meri pa tudi iz Ukrajine, do česar je v obdobju po OP dejansko prišlo.
However, the Commission concluded that those imports could not break the causal link between Belarusian dumped imports and the material injury found to the Union industry and that the dumped imports from Belarus remained the main cause of injury.
Poleg tega je bila stopnja sodelovanja družb iz baltskih držav v preiskavi Komisije zelo nizka, kar očitno kaže na to, da te družbe niso pričakovale, da bi imeli morebitni protidampinški ukrepi v zvezi z uvozom zadevnega izdelka iz Belorusije zanje negativen učinek.
Based on the above analysis, which distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors on the situation of the Union industry from the injurious effects of the dumped imports, it is concluded that the dumped imports from Belarus caused material injury to the Union industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede interesa uporabnikov in uvoznikov, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 123 do 131 in 134 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
G. UNION INTEREST
Potencialna absorpcija dajatev
Interest of the Union industry
V pripombah, predloženih po začasnem razkritju, je pritožnik trdil, da stopnja protidampinške dajatve, kot je bila predlagana v začasni fazi (12,5 %), ne bi zadostovala, saj bi beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je družba v državni lasti s sedežem v državi, ki nima tržnega gospodarstva, z domnevno ugodnim dostopom do subvencionirane surovine (odpadnih kovin), ukrep zlahka absorbiral.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the interest of the Union industry, the conclusions set out in recitals (117) to (122) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba poudariti, da je lahko potencialna absorpcija le predmet ločene preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije na podlagi člena 12 osnovne uredbe in ne more vnaprej vplivati na raven protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih v prvotni preiskavi.
Interest of users and importers
Poleg tega razpoložljivi dokazi v tej preiskavi ne podpirajo trditve beloruskega proizvajalca o enostavnem dostopu do subvencionirane surovine, saj je Komisija dejansko ugotovila, da je družba večino svojih surovin kupila v Rusiji in Ukrajini, tj. državah, ki štejeta za tržni gospodarstvi.
The Belarusian exporting producer claimed in its submissions that the Commission's assessment of Union interest did not take into account particular problems of importers and users located in the Baltic States.
Strateški pomen sodelovanja med EU in Belorusijo v jeklarskem sektorju
It claimed that, due to logistic reasons (such as, railway connections or certificate requirements), Belarus is the only source of supply of rebars for those companies.
V pripombah, predloženih po začasnem razkritju, so se beloruski proizvajalec izvoznik in beloruski organi sklicevali na strateški pomen sodelovanja z EU v jeklarskem sektorju in na dejstvo, da lahko ukrepi negativno vplivajo na nakup osnovne opreme v Uniji s strani Belorusije, vzpostavitev mreže povezanih trgovinskih družb v Uniji in sodelovanje z evropskimi finančnimi institucijami.
In this regard, the Commission confirmed that the only cooperating user located in the Baltic States experienced certain technical problems with deliveries from the Union producers (none of them being located in the Baltic States).
V odgovor na to točko Komisija poudarja, da je edini namen ukrepov ponovno vzpostaviti enake konkurenčne pogoje na trgu Unije.
On the other hand, this company stated that purchases from Belarus could be, and in the post IP period effectively were, replaced by purchases from Russia and to some extent also from Ukraine.
Ukrepi niso kaznovalne narave.
Furthermore, the Commission received very low cooperation from the companies located in the Baltic States, which seems to indicate that they do not perceive that they would be negatively affected by potential antidumping measures concerning Belarusian imports of the product concerned.
Če bo proizvajalec izvoznik trajno povišal svoje cene, tako da dampinga ne bo več, lahko zaprosi za vračilo in vmesni pregled.
In the absence of other comments with regard to the interest of the users and importers, the conclusions set out in recitals (123) to (131) and recital (134) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Zato po mnenju Komisije ti premisleki niso relevantni za oceno interesa Unije.
Potential absorption of the duties
Sklep o interesu Unije