natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Secondly, as explained in recitals (55) to (57) above, the product types imported from China are substitutable by the non-matching product and can therefore cause injury also to the Union producer whose product types did not match the product types imported from China.
Splošni premisleki
Thirdly, the profits of the different producers may be different due to the specific cost and price structures of each producer.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede splošnih premislekov, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 115 do 117 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Finally, the interested party has not suggested any alternative cause of injury that might break the causal link.
Interes industrije Unije
For the above reasons, the claim must be rejected.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede interesa industrije Unije, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 118 do 124 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Conclusion on causation
Interes uporabnikov
In summary, the Commission considers that none of the arguments put forward by the interested parties after the provisional disclosure are able to alter the provisional findings which established a causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry during the IP.
Več zainteresiranih strani je izrazilo pomisleke glede dostopnosti ponudbe neodvisnim uporabnikom.
The conclusions set out in recitals (111) to (114) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Poudarile so, da je uvoz potreben za zadostitev povpraševanju, saj domača zmogljivost še zdaleč ne dosega potrošnje.
Based on the above analysis, which had distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors on the situation of the Union industry from the injurious effects of the dumped imports, it is concluded that the dumped imports from China have caused material injury to the Union industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Po navedbah teh zainteresiranih strani bodo neodvisni uporabniki imeli težave pri pridobivanju zadevnega izdelka, če bo uvoz s Kitajske zaradi ukrepov postal nekonkurenčen.
F. UNION INTEREST
Trdile so, da alternativni viri niso na voljo, saj proizvajalec Unije iz Združenega kraljestva daje prednost svojim povezanim uporabnikom, kar omejuje dostopnost ponudbe neodvisnim uporabnikom in jih potencialno izriva s trga.
After the provisional disclosure, several interested parties claimed that the imposition of the measures would be contrary to the Union interest.
To bi posledično povzročilo izkrivljanje konkurence na trgu nižje v prodajni verigi, kar bi ogrozilo veliko zaposlitev, ki jih trenutno zagotavljajo neodvisni uporabniki.
General considerations
Poudarile so, da je ogroženih več zaposlitev v industriji nižje v prodajni verigi kot v industriji Unije, ki se ukvarja z zadevnim izdelkom.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the general considerations, the conclusions set out in recitals (115) to (117) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Komisija opozarja, da namen protidampinških ukrepov ni zaprtje trga za izvoznike, ki se ukvarjajo z dampingom, ampak izničiti učinke, ki izkrivljajo trg zaradi škodljivega dampinga, in ponovno vzpostaviti učinkovito konkurenco na trgu.
Interest of the Union industry
Ko bo cenovna diskriminacija odpravljena, bodo uporabniki lahko še naprej nabavljali armaturne palice iz jekla z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti s Kitajske.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the interest of the Union industry, the conclusions set out in recitals (118) to (124) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Poleg tega, kot je bilo pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 132 začasne uredbe, je v Uniji še dovolj prostih zmogljivosti, zlasti pri proizvajalcih zunaj Združenega kraljestva, ki nimajo povezanih uporabnikov.
Interest of users
Komisija meni, da ni bil dan noben argument, ki bi kazal, da bodo neodvisni uporabniki imeli težave pri nabavi od teh proizvajalcev Unije.
Several interested parties expressed concerns regarding the availability of supply for independent users.
Posledično bodo lahko neodvisni uporabniki še naprej konkurirali na trgu.
They pointed out that imports are necessary to satisfy the demand since domestic capacity is far below the consumption.
Argumenta zato ni mogoče upoštevati.
According to these interested parties, the independent users will face difficulties to source the product concerned in the event that the imports from China will become uncompetitive as a result of the measures.
Po dokončnem razkritju sta dve zainteresirani strani trdili, da ukrepi niso v interesu Unije, saj bi zaradi ukrepov proti uvozu s Kitajske uporabniki začeli delati z izgubo.
They alleged that alternative sources are not available because the Union producer located in the UK is giving preference to its related users, which restricts the availability of supply to the independent users and potentially forces them out of the market.
Vendar pa zainteresirane strani niso pojasnile, zakaj se uporabniki ne bi obrnili na alternativne vire ponudbe, kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj.
This in turn will lead to competition distortions in the downstream market, putting at risk a large proportion of the jobs currently existing with the independent users.
Trditev zato ni bila upoštevana.
They pointed out that there are more jobs at stake in the downstream industry than in the Union industry involved with the product concerned.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede interesa uporabnikov, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 125 do 136 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The Commission notes that the purpose of anti-dumping measures is not to foreclose the market to exporters practicing dumping but to eliminate the trade distorting effect of injurious dumping and restore effective competition in the market.
Interes uvoznikov
Users could continue to purchase HFP rebars from China once price discrimination has been eliminated.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da bi uvedba ukrepov negativno vplivala na uvoznike.
Furthermore, as explained in the recital (132) of the provisional Regulation, there is a significant spare capacity in the Union, in particular with producers located outside of the UK and who do not have any related users.
Uvozniki zvišanja cen ne bi mogli prevaliti na stranke, zaradi česar bi imeli izgubo.
The Commission considers that no arguments have been put forward showing that the independent users will face difficulties in purchasing from these Union producers.
Glede na njihovo nizko stopnjo dobička bi s tem tvegali propad.
As a consequence, the independent users can continue to compete in the market.
Vendar pa Komisija poudarja, da domača proizvodnja v Združenem kraljestvu ne zadošča za pokritje celotne potrošnje, zato bo uvoz še naprej potreben.
The argument must therefore be disregarded.
Uvozniki bodo po uvedbi dajatev lahko še naprej uvažali od drugih virov, tudi s Kitajske, po neškodljivih cenah.
Following definitive disclosure, two interested parties claimed that the measures are not in the Union interest because the users would become loss-making should the measures against imports from China be imposed.
Zato ni verjetno, da bodo ukrepi na uvoznike znatno negativno vplivali.
However the interested parties did not provide arguments as to why the users could not turn to the alternative sources of supply explained above.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede interesa uvoznikov, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 137 do 139 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The claim was therefore disregarded.
Sklep o interesu Unije
In the absence of other comments with regard to the interest of the users, the conclusions set out in recitals (125) to (136) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Če povzamemo, nobena trditev zainteresiranih strani ni pokazala, da obstajajo prepričljivi razlogi proti uvedbi ukrepov na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s Kitajske.
Interest of importers
Kakršne koli negativne učinke na nepovezane uporabnike zmanjšuje razpoložljivost alternativnih virov ponudbe.
Some interested parties argued that the imposition of measures would have negative impact on the importers.
Poleg tega se pri presoji splošnega učinka protidampinških ukrepov na trg Unije zdi, da pozitivni učinki, zlasti na industrijo Unije, prevladajo nad morebitnimi negativnimi učinki na druge interesne skupine.
The importers would be unable to pass on price increases to customers, which would lead them to losses.
Sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 140 do 142 začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
Considering their narrow profit margins, they would risk going out of business.
G. RETROAKTIVNA UVEDBA PROTIDAMPINŠKIH DAJATEV
The Commission however points out that the domestic production in the UK is not sufficient to supply the entire consumption, thereby leading to a continuous need of imports.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 3 zgoraj, je Komisija, na podlagi zahtevka pritožnika, z 19. decembrom 2015 uvedla obvezno registracijo uvoza armaturnih palic iz jekla z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti s poreklom iz LRK.
The importers will be able to continue their activity by importing from other sources of supply and also from China at non-injurious prices following the imposition of the duties.
Registracija se nanaša na uvoz, opravljen med 19. decembrom 2015 in uvedbo začasnih protidampinških ukrepov, torej 29. januarjem 2016.
The importers are therefore unlikely to suffer substantially negative effects as a result of the measures.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 10 zgoraj, so v postopku sodelovali vsi vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije in trije nepovezani uvozniki.
In the absence of other comments with regard to the interest of importers, the conclusions set out in recitals (137) to (139) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Njihov uvoz je predstavljal 70 % vsega uvoza s Kitajske v OP in 79 % vsega uvoza s Kitajske v obdobju po OP, torej med aprilom 2015 in januarjem 2016.
Conclusion on Union interest
Več zainteresiranih strani je dalo pripombe, da se ne strinjajo z retroaktivno uvedbo dajatev.
In summary, none of the arguments put forward by the interested parties demonstrate that there are compelling reasons against the imposition of measures on imports of the product concerned from China.
Nasprotno pa je industrija Unije zahtevala retroaktivno uvedbo.
Any negative effects on the unrelated users are mitigated by the availability of alternative sources of supply.
V skladu s členom 10(4)(b) osnovne uredbe se lahko dajatev uvede retroaktivno, če „poleg ravni uvoza, ki je povzročal škodo v teku obdobja preiskave, obstaja nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza, ki bo zaradi svoje časovne opredeljenosti in obsega in drugih okoliščin verjetno resno ogrozil popravljalni učinek dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se bo uporabila“.
Moreover, when considering the overall impact of the anti-dumping measures on the Union market, the positive effects, in particular on the Union industry, appear to outweigh the potential negative impacts on the other interest groups.
Komisija ugotavlja, da se je po uvedbi registracije uvoz s Kitajske ustavil, z izjemo ene pošiljke s približno 10000 tonami, ki je v Unijo vstopila po registraciji.
The conclusions set out in recitals (140) to (142) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Preverjanje nacionalnih carinskih organov na podlagi zahteve v skladu s členom 6(4) osnovne uredbe ni pokazalo nobenih drugih prijav pod zadevno kodo TARIC, zato je videti, da so statistični podatki o uvozu, ki so na voljo Komisiji, zanesljivi.
G. RETROACTIVE IMPOSITION OF ANTI-DUMPING DUTIES
Komisija torej ugotavlja, da je registracija zadoščala, da se je uvoz skoraj popolnoma ustavil, s tem pa se je preprečila nadaljnja škoda industriji Unije.
As mentioned in recital (3) above, the Commission made imports of HFP rebars originating in the PRC subject to registration as of 19 December 2015 following a request by the complainant.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da navedena pošiljka verjetno ne bo resno ogrozila popravljalnega učinka dajatve.
The registration concerns imports that have been made between 19 December 2015 and the imposition of the provisional anti-dumping measures, namely 29 January 2016.
Sklep o retroaktivnosti
As mentioned in recital (10) above, cooperation was received from all sampled Union producers and from three unrelated importers.
Na podlagi tega Komisija meni, da eden od pravnih pogojev iz člena 10(4) osnovne uredbe ni izpolnjen, zato se dajatev ne sme uvesti retroaktivno na registriran uvoz.
Their imports represented 70 % of all imports from China during the IP and 79 % of all imports from China in the post-IP period, namely from April 2015 to January 2016.
H. DOKONČNI PROTIDAMPINŠKI UKREPI
Several interested parties submitted comments opposing a retroactive collection of the duties.
Stopnja odprave škode (stopnja škode)
The Union industry, on the opposite, asked for retroactive application.
Po začasnem razkritju je industrija Unije nasprotovala ciljnemu dobičku, s katerim je bila določena stopnja odprave škode, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 147 začasne uredbe, ter trdila, da stopnja (+ 1,65 %) ne zadošča in ni reprezentativna za to vrsto industrije ob odpravi dampinškega uvoza.
Pursuant to Article 10(4)(b) of the basic Regulation, duties may be levied retroactively if there is ‘in addition to the level of imports which caused injury during the investigation period, a further substantial rise in imports which, in the light of its timing and volume and other circumstances, is likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of the definitive anti-dumping duty to be applied’.
Industrija Unije je trdila, da bi morala Komisija določiti višjo stopnjo dobička in predlagala več alternativnih metod določitve upoštevne stopnje dobička.
The Commission observes that after the registration, the imports from China stopped, with the exception of one shipment of approximately 10000 tonnes that entered the Union after registration.
Kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 8 zgoraj, je industrija Unije predložila tudi podatke o preteklih dobičkih pred obravnavanim obdobjem in kot eno izmed možnih alternativ predlagala, da se kot najprimernejše referenčno leto uporabi leto (2008).
Verification by national customs authorities, on the basis of a request based on Article 6(4) of the basic Regulation, has not shown any other declarations belonging under the relevant TARIC code, so the import statistics at the disposal of the Commission appear reliable.
In končno, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 61 zgoraj, se je na podlagi preverjanja popravljenih podatkov o stroških industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju spremenila tudi njena dobičkonosnost.
The Commission therefore observes that the registration has sufficed to almost completely stop the imports and therefore to avoid further injury to the Union industry.
Komisija ugotavlja, da podatki o dobičkonosnosti, ki se nanašajo zlasti na zadevni izdelek, dajejo natančnejše izhodišče za primerjavo kot podatki o dobičkonosnosti drugih izdelkov iz jekla oziroma jeklarskega sektorja na splošno, kar sta bili podlagi za nekatere metode, ki jih je predlagala industrija Unije.
The Commission concludes that the shipment is hence not likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of the duties.
Zato so bile te metode zavrnjene.
Conclusion on retroactivity
Poleg tega Komisija ugotavlja, da podatki o dobičkonosnosti iz obravnavanega obdobja, če je na voljo leto običajnih konkurenčnih razmer, dajejo natančnejše izhodišče za primerjavo kot podatki o dobičkonosnosti izpred obravnavanega obdobja, kar je bila podlaga za nekatere metode, ki jih je predlagala industrija Unije.
On this basis, the Commission considers that one of the legal conditions under Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation is not met and therefore the duties should not be levied retroactively on the registered imports.
Iz razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodnih izjavah 147 in 148 začasne uredbe, je Komisija ugotovila, da leto 2012 izraža dobičke, ki bi jih industrija Unije lahko dosegla v običajnih konkurenčnih razmerah, če dampinškega uvoza ne bi bilo.
H. DEFINITIVE ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
Metode, ki so temeljile na podatkih iz let pred obravnavanim obdobjem, so tako zavrnjene.
Injury elimination level (Injury margin)
Komisija opozarja, da je stopnja dobička, ki je bila začasno določena v uvodni izjavi 147 začasne uredbe, v skladu s prihodki in stroški za leto 2012, ki jih je predložila industrija Unije in ki jih je Komisija preverila v začasni fazi.
Following provisional disclosure, the Union industry contested the target profit used in order to determine the injury elimination level as set out in recital (147) of the provisional Regulation, arguing that the level (+ 1,65 %) was insufficient and not representative for that type of industry in the absence of dumped imports.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 61 zgoraj, se je zaradi popravljenih podatkov, predloženih in preverjenih po začasnem razkritju, spremenila stopnja določenih kazalnikov dobičkonosnosti, denarnega toka, naložb in donosnosti naložb.
The Union industry argued that the Commission should select a higher profit rate and suggested a number of alternative methods to determine the relevant profit rate.
Popravljeni podatki so bili dosledno uporabljeni za celotno obravnavano obdobje.
As mentioned in recital (8) above, the Union industry also submitted data on historical profits from before the period considered and suggested using 2008 as the most suitable reference year as one possible alternative.
Kot izhaja iz preglednic v uvodnih izjavah od 66 do 68, so bili posledično v vseh letih stroški in dobički nekoliko spremenjeni.
Finally, as also explained in recital (61) above, the verification of the revised cost data of the Union industry for the period considered also led to changes in their profitability.
Še zlasti se je dobičkonosnost prodaje nepovezanim strankam, dosežena v letu 2012, spremenila na + 4,8 %, v začasni fazi pa je bila 1,65 %.
The Commission observes that profitability data related specifically to the product concerned constitutes a more accurate benchmark than the profitability data of other steel products or of the steel sector in general, which were the basis of some of the methods suggested by the Union industry.
Sprememba v dobičkonosnosti je posledica nižjih stroškov po spremembi, iz česar izhaja višji dobiček.
Those methods were therefore rejected.
Komisija je ugotovila, da dobiček, dosežen v letu 2012, izraža dobiček, ki bi ga industrija Unije lahko dosegla v običajnih konkurenčnih razmerah, če ne bi bilo dampinga.
Furthermore, the Commission observes that profitability data from the period considered, if a year with normal conditions of competition is available, constitutes a more accurate benchmark than the profitability data from before the period considered, which was the basis of some of the other methods suggested by the Union industry.
Navedena popravljena stopnja dobička, dosežena v letu 2012, je bila torej v dokončni fazi postopka uporabljena kot ciljni dobiček za določitev stopnje škode.
For the reasons explained in recitals (147) to (148) of the provisional Regulation, the Commission found that the year 2012 reflected the profits that could be achieved by the Union industry under normal conditions of competition, in the absence of dumped imports.
Zato je treba v uvodni izjavi 147 začasne uredbe izraz „1,65 %“ nadomestiti s „4,8 %“.
The methods that were based on the data from the years before the period considered were therefore rejected.
Po dokončnem razkritju je industrija Unije pripomnila, da ne bi smeli izključiti stopenj dobička drugih izdelkov in iz drugih obdobij kot morebitnega načina določitve normalnega dobička.
The Commission notes that the profit level provisionally determined in recital (147) of the provisional Regulation was in line with the revenues and costs of the year 2012 submitted by the Union industry and verified by the Commission at the provisional stage.
Industrija Unije je poudarila, da je vloga Komisije dati dejansko oceno in določiti najbolj točno stopnjo dobička v vsaki situaciji.
As explained in recital (61) above, the revised data submitted and verified after the provisional disclosure led to changes in the level of certain indicators concerning profitability, cash flow, investments and return on investments.
Glede tega primera je industrija Unije trdila, da leto 2012 ni bilo leto običajnih konkurenčnih razmer, saj so bile cene odpadne kovine visoke, povpraševanje nizko, likvidacija proizvajalca iz Združenega kraljestva pa je na trgu še povečala ponudbo.
The revised data was applied consistently to the entire period considered.
Zato bi morala Komisija uporabiti stopnje dobička drugih izdelkov in/ali iz drugih obdobij.
As a can be seen in the tables in recitals (66) to (68), the costs and profits were slightly altered in all of the years as a result.
Komisija opozarja, da je glede na trditve o cenah odpadne kovine, povpraševanja in likvidacije proizvajalca, ki jih je v začasni fazi dala industrija Unije, posebej analizirala razmere na trgu v obravnavanem obdobju.
In particular, profitability of the sales to unrelated customers achieved in the year 2012 changed to + 4,8 %, whereas at the provisional stage the profitability was 1,65 %.
Kot je bilo pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 148 začasne uredbe, je Komisija, na podlagi navedenih okoliščin, menila, da v letu 2011 niso veljale normalne tržne razmere.
The change in profitability was due to the revised costs being lower, which therefore resulted in a higher profit.
Glede domnevno nizkega povpraševanja velja, da se je potrošnja med letoma 2011 in 2012 povečala za 9 %, kot izhaja iz uvodne izjave 57 začasne uredbe.
The Commission found that the profits achieved in the year 2012 reflected the profits that the Union industry could have achieved under normal conditions of competition, in the absence of dumping.
Glede likvidacije proizvajalca velja, da je motnja na trg vplivala še zlasti leta 2011, likvidacija pa je bila zaključena na začetku leta 2012.
This revised profit level achieved in 2012 was therefore applied as the target profit at the definitive stage to establish the injury margins.
Zato je Komisija zavrnila trditve pritožnika in znova potrdila ugotovitev, da je bilo leto 2012 obdobje, ko so veljale normalne tržne razmere.
As a result, in recital (147) of the provisional Regulation, the expression ‘1,65 %’ should be replaced by ‘4,8 %’.
Ker je to leto v obdobju preiskave, v katerem so veljale običajne konkurenčne razmere, ni potrebe, da bi določitev normalnega dobička temeljila na drugih obdobjih ali drugih izdelkih.
The Union industry underlined the Commission's role of making a factual assessment to determine the most accurate profit margin in each situation.
V odgovor na to vprašanje Komisija potrjuje, da je uporabila standardno metodologijo: ciljna cena na enoto je bila izračunana tako, da se je ciljni dobiček, kot je določen zgoraj, prištel posameznim stroškom proizvodnje za vsako PCN posebej.
As regards the case at hand, the Union industry argued that 2012 was not a year with normal conditions of competition because of high scrap prices, weak demand and the liquidation of a UK producer putting additional supply to the market.
V primerjavi s tem je bil dejansko dosežen dobiček za vsako PCN drugačen, enak je bil razliki med povprečno prodajno ceno in povprečnimi stroški vsake PCN.
Therefore profit margins of other products and/or other periods should have been used instead.
S tem se šteje, da je bilo na vprašanje zainteresirane strani odgovorjeno.
The Commission notes that it has specifically analysed the situation in the market during the period considered in the light of the arguments concerning scrap prices, demand and the liquidation of a producer put forward by the Union industry at the provisional stage.
In končno, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah od 40 do 49 zgoraj, je bila primerjava cen med uvozom s Kitajske in proizvajalci Unije prilagojena cenam ob dospetju blaga v Združeno kraljestvo in na Irsko.
As explained in recital (148) of the provisional regulation, these circumstances led the Commission to consider the year 2011 not to be a period under normal market conditions.
Posledično je bil spremenjen tudi izračun stopnje odprave škode, ki zdaj izraža primerjavo med cenami izdelkov, ko dospejo v pristanišče v Združenem kraljestvu ali na Irskem.