natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the 25 % decrease in the prices of Belarusian exports to the EU was sharper than the decrease in prices of the sampled Union producers and of average prices of other major exporters of the product concerned to the Union over the same period.
Da bi ugotovili, ali je v OP prišlo do nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen in kolikšno je to bilo, so se tehtane povprečne prodajne cene za posamezno vrsto izdelka vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, zaračunane nepovezanim strankam na trgu Unije, z odštevanjem dejanskih stroškov dobave (0,5–5 %), provizij (0–1,5 %), popustov (0,9–2,3 %) in stroškov kredita (0,2–0,5 %), prilagojene na raven cene franko tovarna, primerjale z ustreznimi tehtanimi povprečnimi cenami za dampinško uvožene vrste izdelka beloruskega proizvajalca, zaračunanimi prvi neodvisni stranki na trgu Unije in določenimi na podlagi CIF.
As a result, in the IP, prices of imports from Belarus were lower than prices of the Union producers and average prices of imports from any of the other major third countries present on the market.
Rezultat primerjave, kadar je izražen kot delež prometa vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije v OP, je pokazal 4,5-odstotno stopnjo nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen.
In order to determine whether there was price undercutting during the IP, and to what extent, the weighted average sales prices per product type of the sampled Union producers charged to unrelated customers on the Union market, adjusted to an ex-works level by deducting the actual delivery costs (0,5 %-5 %), commissions (0 %-1,5 %), discounts (0,9 %-2,3 %) and credit costs (0,2 %-0,5 %), were compared to the corresponding weighted average prices per product type of the dumped imports from the Belarusian producer to the first independent customer on the Union market, established on a CIF basis.
Nižje cene dampinškega uvoza v primerjavi s cenami Unije pojasnjujejo znatno povečanje obsega uvoza iz Belorusije in njegovega tržnega deleža od leta 2014.
The result of the comparison, when expressed as a percentage of the sampled Union producers' turnover during the IP, showed an undercutting margin of 4,5 %.
Proizvajalec izvoznik iz Belorusije je predložil nekatere dokumente za primerjavo prodajnih cen poljskih in beloruskih proizvajalcev, ker je trdil, da so bile beloruske cene v OP dejansko višje od cen proizvajalcev Unije.
The lower prices of the dumped imports compared to the Union prices explain the significant increase in Belarusian import volume and in the market share held by the imports from Belarus from 2014 onwards.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da izračuni nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen in mikrokazalniki v zvezi z ravnjo cene temeljijo na podatkih, pridobljenih od vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, medtem ko so se podatki, ki jih je predložila beloruska družba, nanašali na nevzorčene poljske proizvajalce.
The Belarusian exporting producer submitted certain documents for the comparison of the sales prices of the Polish and Belarusian producers with the aim to claim that Belarusian prices were actually higher in the IP than the prices of the Union producers.
Zato predloženi podatki ne vplivajo na ugotovitve Komisije v zvezi z nelojalnim nižanjem prodajnih cen in gibanja mikroekonomskih kazalnikov v obravnavanem obdobju, kot so opisana v uvodni izjavi 83.
In this regard it is recalled that the undercutting calculations and micro indicators concerning price level are based on the data collected from the sampled Union producers while the data submitted by the Belarusian company referred to non-sampled Polish producers.
Poleg tega so to zbirni podatki vseh vzorčenih družb in vseh njihovih nepovezanih prodajnih transakcij, ki se upoštevajo pri določanju gibanja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen in mikrokazalnikov.
Therefore, the submitted data have no influence on the Commission findings with regard to price undercutting and microeconomic indicator trends in the period considered as described in recital 83.
Kljub temu Komisija potrjuje, da so beloruske cene v OP nelojalno nižale prodajne cene čisto vseh vzorčenih proizvajalcev EU.
Furthermore, these are aggregated data of all the sampled companies and all their unrelated sales transactions which are taken into account for establishing the undercutting and micro indicators trends.
Gospodarski položaj industrije Unije
Nevertheless, the Commission confirms that during the IP Belarusian prices undercut each and every single sampled EU producer.
Uvodne opombe
Economic situation of the Union industry
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe je proučitev vpliva dampinškega uvoza iz Belorusije na industrijo Unije vključevala oceno vseh gospodarskih kazalnikov, ki so vplivali na stanje industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju.
Preliminary remarks
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 59, je bilo vzorčenje uporabljeno za pregled morebitne škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the examination of the impact of the dumped imports from Belarus on the Union industry included an evaluation of all economic indicators having a bearing on the state of the Union industry during the period considered.
Komisija je za analizo škode razlikovala med makro- in mikroekonomskimi kazalniki škode.
As mentioned in recital 59, sampling was used for the examination of the possible injury suffered by the Union industry.
V zvezi s tem se gospodarski položaj industrije Unije oceni na podlagi (a) makroekonomskih kazalnikov, in sicer proizvodnje, proizvodne zmogljivosti, izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, obsega prodaje, tržnega deleža in rasti, zaposlenosti, produktivnosti, višine dejanske stopnje dampinga in okrevanja od preteklega dampinga, za katere so bili podatki zbrani na ravni celotne industrije Unije, in na podlagi (b) mikroekonomskih kazalnikov, in sicer povprečne cene na enoto, stroškov na enoto, dobičkonosnosti, denarnega toka, naložb, donosnosti naložb in zmožnosti zbiranja kapitala, zalog in stroškov dela, za katere so bili podatki zbrani na ravni vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
For the purpose of the injury analysis, the Commission distinguished between macroeconomic and microeconomic injury indicators.
Za določitev makroekonomskih kazalnikov in zlasti podatkov, ki se nanašajo na nevzorčene proizvajalce Unije, so bile uporabljene vse razpoložljive informacije o industriji Unije, vključno z informacijami iz pritožbe, podatki, ki so jih proizvajalci Unije sporočili pred začetkom preiskave in po njem, ter izpolnjenimi vprašalniki vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
In this regard, the economic situation of the Union industry is assessed on the basis of (a) macroeconomic indicators, namely production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales volume, market share and growth, employment, productivity, magnitude of the actual dumping margin and recovery from past dumping, for which the data was collected at the level of the total Union industry; and on the basis of (b) microeconomic indicators, namely average unit prices, unit cost, profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investment and ability to raise capital, stocks and labour costs, for which the data was collected at the level of the sampled Union producers.
Mikroekonomski kazalniki so bili določeni na podlagi informacij, ki so jih v izpolnjenih vprašalnikih sporočili vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije.
All available information concerning the Union industry including information provided in the complaint, data collected from the Union producers before and after the initiation of the investigation, and the questionnaire responses of the sampled Union producers, was used in order to establish the macroeconomic indicators and in particular the data pertaining to the non-sampled Union producers.
Makroekonomski kazalniki
The microeconomic indicators were established on the basis of information provided by the sampled Union producers in their questionnaire replies.
Proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti
Macroeconomic indicators
Gibanje proizvodnje, proizvodne zmogljivosti in izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti v Uniji se je v obravnavanem obdobju razvijalo na naslednji način:
Production, production capacity and capacity utilisation
Obseg proizvodnje (v tonah)
The trends for Union production, production capacity and the utilisation of the capacity developed as follows during the period considered:
Proizvodna zmogljivost (v tonah)
Production volume (tonnes)
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti (v %)
Production capacity (tonnes)
Obseg proizvodnje Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 5 %.
Capacity utilisation (%)
Ob upoštevanju, da se v obravnavanem obdobju proizvodna zmogljivost ni spremenila, je zmanjšanje obsega proizvodnje povzročilo zmanjšanje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti za 4 odstotne točke, in sicer z 71 % leta 2012 na 67 % v OP.
The Union production volume decreased 5 % during the period considered.
Obseg prodaje, tržni delež in rast
Taking into account that production capacity remained constant during that period, the decrease in output resulted in a reduction of the capacity utilisation by 4 percentage points from 71 % in 2012 to 67 % in the IP.
Prodaja proizvajalcev Unije je vključevala prodajo povezanim družbam.
Sales volume, market share and growth
Ta prodaja povezanim družbam je v obravnavanem obdobju predstavljala približno 10 % potrošnje Unije.
The sales of the Union producers included sales to related companies.
Zato so bili obseg prodaje, tržni delež in rast ocenjeni ločeno za povezano prodajo in prosti trg (nepovezano prodajo).
These sales to related companies represented, over the period considered, around 10 % of the Union consumption.
Kar zadeva povezano prodajo, je potrjeno, da je usmerjena na povezane uporabnike in ne na povezane trgovinske družbe, zato se pri izračunu celotne potrošnje Unije ne upošteva dvakrat.
Sales volume, market share and growth were therefore assessed separately for related sales and free market (unrelated sales).
Gibanje v zvezi z obsegom prodaje, tržnim deležem in rastjo se je v obravnavanem obdobju razvijalo na naslednji način:
With regard to related sales it is confirmed that they are directed to the related users not to the related trading companies therefore they are not double counted in the calculation of the total Union consumption.
Obseg nepovezane prodaje (v tonah)
The trends concerning sales volumes, market share and growth developed as follows during the period considered:
Tržni delež nepovezane prodaje (v %)
Sales volume unrelated (tonnes)
Obseg povezane prodaje (v tonah)
Market share unrelated sales (%)
Tržni delež povezane prodaje (v %)
Sales volume related (tonnes)
V obravnavanem obdobju se je obseg prodaje industrije Unije nepovezanim strankam zmanjšal za 6 %, to stanje pa se kaže tudi v zmanjšanju tržnega deleža za 7 odstotnih točk med letom 2012 in OP.
Market share related sales (%)
Do tega je prišlo kljub povečanju potrošnje na trgu Unije v istem obdobju.
The Union industry sales volume to unrelated customers decreased by 6 % in the period concerned, situation which is reflected also in the 7 percentage points decrease of market share between 2012 and the IP.
Obseg prodaje se je hitro zmanjšal med letoma 2012 in 2013, ko je gibanje obsega prodaje natančno sledilo gibanju potrošnje – in industriji Unije je uspelo ohraniti enak tržni delež.
This occurred in spite of an increase in consumption in the Union market during the same period.
Vendar se je stanje med letom 2013 in OP popolnoma spremenilo.
Rapid decrease in volumes of sales took place between 2012 and 2013 when the sales volume trend followed exactly the trend in consumption — and the Union industry was able to maintain the same market share.
Trg Unije je v tem obdobju zrasel za 10 %, industrija Unije pa je v istem času izgubila 7 % tržnega deleža.
However, in the period between 2013 and the IP the situation changed completely.
V istem obdobju sta se uvoz iz Belorusije in njegov tržni delež hitro povečala.
Union market grew by 10 % in this period while in the same time the Union industry lost 7 percentage points of its market share.
To dokazuje, da industrija Unije zaradi vedno večjega tržnega deleža dampinškega uvoza ni mogla izkoristiti rasti potrošnje Unije.
At the same time the volume of Belarusian imports and their market share increased rapidly.
Zaposlenost in produktivnost
This demonstrates that the Union industry could not benefit from the growth in Union consumption due to the increasing market share of dumped imports.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se je skupaj z zmanjšanjem proizvodnje in prodaje znižala tudi stopnja zaposlenosti v industriji Unije, in sicer za 2 % med letom 2012 in OP.
Employment and productivity
Vendar pa to znižanje stopnje zaposlenosti ni povzročilo povečanja produktivnosti, ki se meri s proizvodnjo na zaposleno osebo na leto, saj je bilo zmanjšanje obsega proizvodnje v obravnavanem obdobju večje od znižanja stopnje zaposlenosti.
In line with the decline in production and sales, it was observed that the level of the Union industry's employment also decreased by 2 % between 2012 and the IP.
Vir: pritožba in izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
However, this reduction of employment did not result in increase in productivity, measured as output per person employed per year, as the drop in production volume in the period considered was deeper than the reduction in employment.
Število zaposlenih
Source: Complaint and questionnaire replies.
Produktivnost (v metričnih tonah/zaposlenega)
Number of employees
Višina dejanske stopnje dampinga in okrevanje od preteklega dampinga
Productivity (MT/employee)
Stopnja dampinga beloruskega proizvajalca izvoznika je znatna (glej uvodno izjavo 55).
Magnitude of the actual dumping margin and recovery from past dumping
Glede na obseg, tržni delež in cene dampinškega uvoza iz Belorusije, ki so obravnavani zgoraj, vpliva dejanske stopnje dampinga na industrijo Unije ni mogoče obravnavati kot zanemarljivega.
The dumping margin of the Belarusian exporting producer is considerable (see recital 55 above).
Ker ni predhodnih ugotovitev o dampinškem uvozu zadevnega izdelka, industrija Unije ne okreva od preteklih dampinških praks v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom.
Given the volume, market share and prices of the dumped imports from Belarus, discussed above, the impact on the Union industry of the actual dumping margin cannot be considered to be negligible.
Mikroekonomski kazalniki
As no finding on dumped imports of the product concerned was made previously, the Union industry is not recovering from any past dumping practices regarding the product concerned.
Povprečne prodajne cene na enoto na trgu Unije in proizvodni stroški na enoto
Microeconomic indicators
Povprečne prodajne cene vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije pri prodaji nepovezanim strankam v Uniji so se v prvi polovici obravnavanega obdobja (2012–2013) znižale zaradi „sheme goljufanja na področju DDV“ (glej uvodne izjave 106 do 111).
Average unit selling prices on the Union market and unit cost of production
V drugi polovici obravnavanega obdobja (2014–OP) so se znižale zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz Belorusije.
The average sales prices of the sampled Union producers to unrelated customers have been depressed in the first part of the period considered (2012-2013) by the impact of the ‘VAT fraud scheme’ (see recitals 106 to 111).
V obravnavanem obdobju so se cene v Uniji od leta 2012 do OP znižale za 22 %.
In the second part of the period considered (2014-IP), they have been depressed by the dumped imports from Belarus.
Znižanje cen kaže splošno zniževanje cene glavne surovine na svetovni ravni.
During the period considered the prices in the Union decreased by 22 % from 2012 to the IP.
Vendar zaradi nadaljnjega nižanja cen, ki ga je povzročil dampinški uvoz iz Belorusije, kjer je bilo znižanje cen še večje in ni izražalo zgolj stroškov surovine, proizvajalci Unije niso mogli vrniti cen, ki so se znižale zaradi sheme goljufanja na področju DDV, na normalne in neizkrivljene ravni ter izkoristiti znižanja stroškov glavne surovine, temveč so morali ohraniti cene na nižji ravni, kot bi bila v običajnih konkurenčnih pogojih.
The price decrease reflects a general lowering trend in the worldwide cost of the main raw material.
V obravnavanem obdobju so se stroški industrije Unije znižali za 20 %, kar je bilo manj, kot so se znižale cene.
However, due to the further price depression exerted by the dumped imports from Belarus, where the decrease in prices was deeper than only reflecting the raw material cost, the Union producers could not return prices depressed by the VAT fraud scheme to normal and undistorted levels, benefitting from the reduction in the costs of the main raw material, but had to keep prices lower than under normal competition.
To je pojasnjeno z višjimi stroški energije in dela.
In the period considered, the costs of the Union industry decreased by 20 % which was less than decrease in prices.
Posledično se je dobičkonosnost industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju poslabšala.
This is explained by higher energy and labour costs.
Vir: izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
As a result, over the period considered profitability of the Union industry deteriorated.
Povprečna prodajna cena na enoto v Uniji nepovezanim strankam (v EUR/tono)
Source: Questionnaire replies.
Stroški na enoto prodanega blaga (v EUR/tono)
Average unit selling price in the Union to unrelated customers (EUR/tonne)
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe, donosnost naložb in zmožnost zbiranja kapitala
Unit cost of goods sold (EUR/tonne)
Denarni tok, naložbe in donosnost naložb proizvajalcev Unije ter njihova zmožnost zbiranja kapitala so se v obravnavanem obdobju razvijali na naslednji način:
During the period considered the Union producers' cash flow, investment, return on investment and their ability to raise capital developed as follows:
Denarni tok (v EUR)
Cash flow (EUR)
Donosnost naložb (v %)
Investments (EUR)
Dobičkonosnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije je izražena tako, da je neto dobiček pred obdavčitvijo pri prodaji podobnega izdelka strankam v Uniji izražen kot delež prihodkov od te prodaje.
Return on investments (%)
Vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije so imeli leta 2012 dobiček, od leta 2013 pa so ustvarjali izgubo.
The profitability of the sampled Union producers is expressed as the pre-tax net profit of the sales of the like product to customers in the Union as a percentage of the turnover of those sales.
Dobičkonosnost, ki je v OP dosegla najnižjo raven, sovpada z največjim obsegom uvoza iz Belorusije in njegovo najnižjo ravnjo cen v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.
The sampled Union producers were profitable in 2012, but became loss-making from 2013 onwards.
Denarni tok, tj. zmožnost industrije, da sama financira svoje dejavnosti, se je v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju poslabšal, čeprav je bil vseskozi pozitiven.
What is more, their profitability reaches its lowest level in the IP which correlates with the highest volumes of the imports from Belarus and its lowest price level in the whole period considered.
Proizvajalci Unije so v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju še vedno lahko vlagali, a je razvoj dobičkonosnosti in denarnega toka negativno vplival tudi na naložbe, ki so se v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšale za 29 %.
Cash flow, which is the ability of the industry to self-finance its activities, although positive throughout the whole period considered, deteriorated over the whole period considered.
Poleg tega je donosnost naložb od leta 2013 stalno negativna, v skladu z gibanjem dobičkonosnosti.
The Union producers were still able to invest over the whole period considered but the evolution of profitability and cash flow adversely affected also investments which over the period considered decreased by 29 %.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je mogoče sklepati, da je bila finančna uspešnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije v OP negativna.
Furthermore, the return on investments is constantly negative from 2013 onwards following the trend in profitability.
Zaloge
In light of the above, it can be concluded that the financial performance of the sampled Union producers was negative during the IP.
Raven zalog vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za 25 %.
Stocks
Vendar pa je razmerje med obsegom zalog in obsegom proizvodnje v obravnavanem obdobju ostalo stabilno (1–1,5 %) – raven zalog je sledila zmanjševanju obsega proizvodnje.
The level of stocks of the sampled Union producers decreased by 25 % during the period considered.
Končne zaloge (v tonah)
However, the ratio of stocks to the production volume remains stable in the period considered (1 % to 1,5 %) — the stock level follows decreasing trend in production volume.
Stroški dela
Closing stocks (tonnes)
Povprečni stroški dela vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije so se v obravnavanem obdobju skromno povečali.
Labour costs
Stroški dela so predstavljali manj kot 10 % skupnih stroškov proizvodnje.
The average labour costs of the sampled Union producers increased modestly during the period considered.
Zato niso odločilen dejavnik pri razvoju stroškov proizvodnje.
Labour costs represented less than 10 % of the total costs of production.
Povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega (v EUR)
Therefore labour costs do not represent a determining factor in the evolution of the cost of production.
Sklep o škodi
Average labour costs per employee (EUR)
Preiskava je pokazala, da industrija Unije ni izkoristila povečanja potrošnje v obravnavanem obdobju.
Conclusion on injury
Nasprotno, industrija Unije je v obravnavanem obdobju utrpela 6-odstotno zmanjšanje obsega prodaje, njen tržni delež pa se je zmanjšal za 6 odstotnih točk (ob upoštevanju 3-odstotnega povečanja skupne potrošnje).
The investigation showed that the Union industry did not benefit from the increase in consumption during the period considered.
To gibanje je očitnejše, če se upošteva obdobje med letom 2013 in OP, ko sta se obseg uvoza iz Belorusije in njegov tržni delež hitro povečevala.
To the contrary, the Union industry suffered a 6 % drop in the sales volumes in the period considered and its market share decreased by 6 percentage points (against the background of a 3 % increase of the total consumption).
V istem obdobju se je tržni delež industrije Unije zmanjšal za 7 odstotnih točk, medtem ko se je potrošnja povečala (za več kot 10 %).
These trends are more clearly visible when the period from 2013 to the IP is taken into consideration, when import volumes from Belarus were growing rapidly and increasing its market share.
Industrija Unije je v obravnavanem obdobju utrpela tudi 5-odstotno zmanjšanje obsega proizvodnje, kar je privedlo do zmanjšanja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti z 71 % na 67 %.
Within the same period, the Union industry lost 7 percentage points of market share, in a scenario of increasing consumption (+10 %).
Poleg tega je morala industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju zaradi večje nelojalne konkurence zaradi dampinškega uvoza cene v povprečju znižati za 22 %, to pa je vodilo od 1,3-odstotnega dobička v letu 2012 do 2,1-odstotne izgube v OP, in to kljub znižanju stroškov in stopenj zaposlenosti.
The Union industry suffered also a 5 % decrease in production output in the period considered, which resulted in a drop of capacity utilisation from 71 % to 67 %.
V obravnavanem obdobju je dampinški uvoz negativno vplival tudi na druge finančne kazalnike, kot so donos na sredstva, denarni tok in naložbe.
Furthermore, due to increased unfair competition from dumped imports, the Union industry had to reduce its prices on average by 22 % in the period considered which has resulted in a decline from 1,3 % profit in 2012 to 2,1 % loss in the IP despite the reduction of costs and employment.
Glede na navedeno se začasno sklene, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
Finally, other financial indicators such as return on assets, cash flow and investments were also adversely affected in the period considered.
VZROČNA ZVEZA
In light of the foregoing, it is provisionally concluded that the Union industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Uvod
CAUSATION
Komisija je v skladu s členom 3(6) in (7) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je dampinški uvoz iz Belorusije industriji Unije povzročil tolikšno škodo, da se šteje za znatno.