natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
☐ Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 is not applicable (Article 2).
☐ sodišče, ki je izdalo evropski nalog za zamrznitev bančnih računov, ni pristojno (člen 6).
Please provide details:
☐ nalog za zamrznitev ni nujno potreben, ker ne obstaja tveganje, da bo poznejša izvršitev upnikovega zahtevka zoper mene ovirana ali precej otežena (člen 7(1)).
☐ the case is not a cross-border case (Article 3).
☐ upnik ni predložil zadostnih dokazov, da bo verjetno uspel v glavni stvari zahtevka zoper mene (člen 7(2)).
☐ the court that issued the Preservation Order has no jurisdiction (Article 6).
☐ upnik ni začel postopka v glavni stvari v roku, ki ga je določilo sodišče (člen 10).
☐ there is no urgent need for the Preservation Order because there is no risk that the subsequent enforcement of the creditor's claim against me will be impeded or made substantially more difficult (Article 7(1)).
☐ bi bilo treba od upnika zahtevati zagotovitev varščine ali večje zavarovanje, kot ga je odredilo sodišče (člen 12).
☐ the creditor did not submit sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he is likely to succeed on the substance of his claim against me (Article 7(2)).
☐ nalog za zamrznitev, izjava o zamrznitvi sredstev in/ali drugi dokumenti iz člena 28(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014, in sicer vloga za izdajo naloga za zamrznitev, ki jo je upnik predložil sodišču, in kopije vseh dokumentov, ki jih je upnik predložil sodišču, da bi pridobil nalog, mi niso bili vročeni v 14 dneh od zamrznitve mojega računa ali računov.
☐ the creditor has not initiated the proceedings on the substance of the matter within the deadlines indicated by the court (Article 10).
Navedite naslov, na katerega se lahko pošljejo dokumenti in prevodi:
☐ the creditor should have been required to provide security or a higher security than the one ordered by the court (Article 12).
oziroma
☐ the Preservation Order, the declaration concerning the preservation of funds, and/or the other documents referred to in Article 28(5) of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014, that is to say, the application for the Preservation Order submitted by the creditor to the court and copies of all documents submitted by the creditor to the court in order to obtain the order, were not served on me within 14 days of the preservation of my account or accounts.
☐ svoje soglasje, da boste navedene dokumente dvignili na sodišču države članice izvora, tako da označite okence.
Please indicate an address to which the documents and translations can be sent:
☐ dokumenti, ki so mi bili vročeni v skladu s členom 28, ne izpolnjujejo jezikovnih zahtev iz Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014.
or, alternatively,
Natančneje, v skladu s členom 49(1) Uredbe morata biti nalog za zamrznitev in vloga za izdajo naloga za zamrznitev, ki ju upnik predloži sodišču, prevedena v uradni jezik države članice, v kateri ima dolžnik stalno prebivališče, ali v drug jezik, ki ga dolžnik razume.
☐ please indicate your agreement to collect those documents at the court of the Member State of origin by ticking the box.
Po potrebi navedite drug jezik, ki ga razumete:
☐ the documents served on me in accordance with Article 28 did not meet the language requirements set out in Regulation (EU) No 655/2014.
☐ zamrznjeni zneski, ki presegajo znesek iz naloga za zamrznitev, niso bili sproščeni v skladu s členom 27 Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014.
In particular, Article 49(1) of the Regulation requires that the Preservation Order and the application for the Preservation Order submitted by the creditor to the court should be translated into the official language of the Member State in which the debtor is domiciled or another language that the debtor understands.
☐ zahtevek, katerega izvršitev je želel upnik zagotoviti z nalogom za zamrznitev, je bil v celoti ali delno poplačan.
If applicable, please indicate another language that you understand:
☐ zahtevek, katerega izvršitev je želel upnik zagotoviti z nalogom za zamrznitev, je bil s sodno odločbo o glavni stvari zavrnjen.
☐ preserved amounts exceeding the amount of the Preservation Order were not released in accordance with Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014.
☐ sodna odločba o glavni stvari, sodna poravnava ali javna listina, katere izvršitev je želel upnik zagotoviti z nalogom za zamrznitev, je bila razveljavljena ali odpravljena, odvisno od primera.
☐ the claim the enforcement of which the creditor was seeking to secure by means of the Preservation Order has been paid in full or in part.
☐ okoliščine, na podlagi katerih je bil nalog za zamrznitev izdan, so se spremenile.
☐ the judgment on the substance of the matter has dismissed the claim the enforcement of which the creditor was seeking to secure by means of the Preservation Order.
☐ dogovorila sva se (dolžnik in upnik) za poravnavo zahtevka.
☐ the judgment on the substance of the matter, or the court settlement or authentic instrument, the enforcement of which the creditor was seeking to secure by means of the Preservation Order has been set aside or, as the case may be, annulled.
V tem primeru morata ta obrazec podpisati upnik in dolžnik.
☐ the circumstances on the basis of which the Preservation Order was issued have changed.
Vloga za pravno sredstvo v državi članici izvršitve
☐ we (the debtor and the creditor) agreed to settle the claim.
Vlagam vlogo, s katero zahtevam, naj se izvršitev naloga za zamrznitev (označite ustrezno okence):
In this case, this form has to be signed by both the creditor and the debtor.
☐ omeji
Application for a remedy in the Member State of enforcement
☐ ustavi
I hereby lodge an application to have the enforcement of the Preservation Order (please tick the relevant box):
ker (označite ustrezna okenca v točki 7.1.1 spodaj; če zahtevate omejitev ali spremembo, pri ustreznem okencu navedite tudi posamezno zahtevano omejitev ali spremembo):
☐ limited
Nalog za zamrznitev ni bil izvršen v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 655/2014, ker:
☐ terminated
☐ bi morali biti nekateri zneski na računu, ki je bil zamrznjen, izvzeti iz zasega v skladu s členom 31(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014 ali ker zneski, izvzeti iz zasega, niso bili upoštevani ali niso bili ustrezno upoštevani pri izvajanju naloga za zamrznitev v skladu s členom 31(2) navedene uredbe.
on the grounds that (please tick the relevant box(es) in point 7.1.1. below; where you are requesting the limitation or modification, please also indicate under the relevant box the particular limitation or modification requested):
☐ zamrznjeni račun je izključen s področja uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014 (člen 2 Uredbe).
the Preservation Order has not been enforced in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 655/2014, because:
☐ izvršitev sodne odločbe, sodne poravnave ali javne listine, ki jo je upnik želel zagotoviti z nalogom, je bila v državi članici izvršitve zavrnjena;
☐ certain amounts held in the account that was preserved should be exempt from seizure in accordance with Article 31(3) of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014, or amounts exempt from seizure have not or not correctly been taken into account in the implementation of the Preservation Order in accordance with Article 31(2) of that Regulation.
☐ izvršljivost sodne odločbe, katere izvršitev je želel upnik zagotoviti z nalogom za zamrznitev, je bila v državi članici izvora odložena;
☐ the account preserved is excluded from the scope of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 (Aricle 2 of the Regulation).
☐ nalog za zamrznitev, izjava o zamrznitvi sredstev in/ali drugi dokumenti iz člena 28(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014 mi niso bili vročeni v 14 dneh od zamrznitve mojih računov;
☐ the enforcement of the judgment or court settlement or authentic instrument that the creditor was seeking to secure by means of the order has been refused in the Member State of enforcement;
☐ svoje soglasje, da boste navedene dokumente dvignili na sodišču države članice izvora, tako da označite okence.
☐ the enforceability of the judgment the enforcement of which the creditor was seeking to secure by means of the Preservation Order has been suspended in the Member State of origin;
☐ dokumenti, ki so mi bili vročeni v skladu s členom 28 Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014, ne izpolnjujejo jezikovnih zahtev iz navedene uredbe.
☐ the Preservation Order, the declaration concerning the preservation of funds and/or the other documents referred to in Article 28(5) of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 were not served on me within 14 days of the preservation of my account(s);
Natančneje, v skladu s členom 49(1) Uredbe morata biti nalog za zamrznitev in vloga za izdajo naloga za zamrznitev, ki ju upnik predloži sodišču, prevedena v uradni jezik države članice, v kateri ima dolžnik stalno prebivališče, ali drug jezik, ki ga upnik razume;
☐ please indicate your agreement to collect those documents at the court of the Member State of origin by ticking the box;
☐ zamrznjeni zneski, ki presegajo znesek iz naloga za zamrznitev, niso bili sproščeni v skladu s členom 27 Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014.
☐ the documents served on me in accordance with Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 did not meet the language requirements set out in that Regulation.
☐ zahtevek, katerega izvršitev je želel upnik zagotoviti z nalogom za zamrznitev, je bil v celoti ali delno poplačan.
In particular, Article 49(1) of the Regulation requires that the Preservation Order and the application for the Preservation Order submitted by the creditor to the court should be translated into the official language of the Member State in which the debtor is domiciled or another language which the debtor understands;
☐ zahtevek, katerega izvršitev je želel upnik zagotoviti z nalogom za zamrznitev, je bil s sodno odločbo o glavni stvari zavrnjen,
☐ the preserved amounts exceeding the amount of the Preservation Order were not released in accordance with Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014.
☐ izvršitev naloga za zamrznitev je v očitnem nasprotju z javnim redom države članice izvršitve.
☐ the claim, the enforcement of which the creditor was seeking to secure by means of the Preservation Order, has been paid in full or in part.
V tem primeru morata ta obrazec podpisati upnik in dolžnik.
☐ the judgment on the substance of the matter has dismissed the claim, the enforcement of which the creditor was seeking to secure by means of the Preservation Order;
☐ zneske, izvzete iz zamrznitve, je treba prilagoditi.
☐ the enforcement of the Preservation Order is manifestly contrary to the public policy of the Member State of the enforcement.
Navedite dokaze v podporo svoji vlogi za pravno sredstvo:
In this case, this form has to be signed by both the creditor and the debtor;
Izjavljam, da so navedene informacije, kolikor mi je znano, resnične in posredovane v dobri veri.
☐ the amounts exempted from preservation have to be adjusted.
Če upnik in dolžnik vlagata skupno vlogo (za preklic ali spremembo naloga za zamrznitev ali ustavitevali omejitev njegove izvršitve), ker sta se dogovorila za poravnavo zahtevka, morata ta razdelekizpolniti obe stranki.
Please list the evidence supporting your application for a remedy:
V takem primeru pri izpolnjevanju obrazca na papirju uporabiterazličneliste za vsako stranko in vsako stran oštevilčite.
I declare that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge and is given in good faith.
Ta razdelek se ne izpolni, če so bile informacije v razdelku 2 že navedene za upnika in dolžnika, kadar vlagata skupno vlogo, ker sta se dogovorila za poravnavo zahtevka.
Where a joint application is made by the creditor and the debtor (for the revocation or modification of the Preservation Order or for termination or limitation of the enforcement of the Preservation Order) on the ground that they agreed to settle the claim, this section has to be filled in by both parties.
PRILOGA VIII
In such circumstances, when filling in the form on paper, please use a separate sheet for each party and number each page.
Posredovanje odločitve o pravnem sredstvu državi članici izvršitve
This section is not to be filled in if the information in section 2 was already given both for the creditor and the debtor where a joint application is made on the ground that they agreed to settle the claim.
(Člen 36(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o določitvi postopka za evropski nalog za zamrznitev bančnih računov z namenom olajšanja čezmejne izterjave dolgov v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah)
ANNEX VIII
1.
Transmission of a decision on a remedy to the Member State of enforcement
Evropski nalog za zamrznitev bančnih računov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nalog za zamrznitev):
(Article 36(5) of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters)
Sodišče, ki je izdalo odločitev o pravnem sredstvu (izpolni se samo, če se razlikuje od sodišča (navedenega v razdelku 2), ki je izdalo nalog za zamrznitev)
European Account Preservation Order (‘the Preservation Order’):
Vložnik (vloge za pravno sredstvo)
Court that issued the decision on the remedy (to be filled in only if different from the court (referred to in section 2) that has issued the Preservation Order)
Vložniki vloge za pravno sredstvo v postopku za izdajo naloga za zamrznitev so (označite ustrezno okence): [2]
Applicant (for the remedy)
Odločitev sodišča o pravnem sredstvu
The applicant(s) for the remedy is/are, in the proceedings leading to the issuing of the Preservation Order (please tick the relevant box): [2]
Datum (dd. mm. llll) odločitve:
Decision of the court on the remedy
Referenčna številka odločitve:
Date (dd/mm/yyyy) of the decision:
Odločitev:
File number of the decision:
☐ nalog za zamrznitev se prekliče
The decision:
☐ nalog za zamrznitev se spremeni tako:
☐ The Preservation Order is revoked
Pristojni organ države članice izvršitve naloga za zamrznitev mora sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za izvedbo odločitve o pravnem sredstvu.
☐ The Preservation Order is modified in the following way:
Če je odločitev o pravnem sredstvu izdana v zvezi s skupno vlogo, ki sta jo upnik in dolžnik vložila (zapreklic ali spremembo naloga za zamrznitev), ker sta se dogovorila za poravnavo zahtevka, morata bitiv tem razdelku navedeni obe stranki.
The competent authority of the Member State of enforcement of the Preservation Order is requested to take the necessary steps to have the decision on the remedy implemented.
Ne izpolni se, če so bile informacije v razdelku 4 že navedene za upnika in dolžnika, kadar sta vložila skupno vlogo za pravno sredstvo, ker sta se dogovorila za poravnavo zahtevka.
Where a decision on a remedy is issued in relation to a joint application that was made by the creditor and the debtor (for the revocation or modification of the Preservation Order) on the grounds that they agreed to settle the claim, both parties should be indicated in this section.
PRILOGA IX
Not to be filled in if the information in section 4 was already given both for the creditor and the debtor where a joint application for a remedy was made on the grounds that they agreed to settle the claim.
Vloga za pritožbo zoper odločitev o pravnem sredstvu
ANNEX IX
(Člen 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o določitvi postopka za evropski nalog za zamrznitev bančnih računov z namenom olajšanja čezmejne izterjave dolgov v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah)
Appeal against a decision on a remedy
Ta obrazec izpolnite v jeziku pristojnega organa, ki mu pošiljate zahtevo.
(Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters)
Seznam pristojnih sodišč za pritožbo na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 655/2014 je na voljo na spletišču evropskega portala e-pravosodje na spletnem naslovu https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_european_account_preservation_order-379-sl.do.
Fill in this form in the language of the court to which you are sending your application.
Obrazcu morajo biti priloženi vsi ustrezni spremni dokumenti.
The list of the competent courts for an appeal under Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 is available on the website of the European e-Justice Portal at https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_european_account_preservation_order-379-en.do.
Priložite tudi kopijo odločitve, zoper katero se vlaga pritožba.
Please note that this form must be accompanied by all relevant supporting documents.
Na spletišču evropskega portala e-pravosodje so na voljo nekatere informacije o plačilu sodnih taks v postopku v zadevi v zadevni državi članici.
Please also attach a copy of the decision that is being appealed.
Sodišče, pri katerem se vlaga pritožba
On the website of the European e-Justice Portal you can find certain information on the payment of the court fees in the proceedings at issue in the Member State concerned.
Vložnik pritožbe
Court at which the appeal is lodged
Vložnik pritožbe v postopku za izdajo evropskega naloga za zamrznitev bančnih računov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nalog za zamrznitev) je (označite ustrezno okence):
Applicant for an appeal
Druga stranka
The applicant for an appeal is, in the proceedings leading to the issuing of the European Account Preservation Order (‘the Preservation Order’) (please tick the relevant box):
Telefon: [2] Neobvezno.
The other party
Sodišče ali pristojni izvršitveni organ, ki je izdal odločitev o pravnem sredstvu (ne izpolni se, če je sodišče isto kot sodišče (navedeno v razdelku 4), ki je izdalo nalog za zamrznitev)
Telephone: [2] Optional
Odločitev o pravnem sredstvu:
Court or competent enforcement authority that issued the decision on the remedy (not to be filled in if the court is the same as the court (referred to in section 4) that issued the Preservation Order)
Referenčna številka odločitve:
The decision on the remedy:
Odločitev o pravnem sredstvu je bila izdana v zvezi z vlogo za pravno sredstvo, ki jo je vložil (označite ustrezno okence):
Reference number of the decision:
☐ Upnik v postopku za izdajo naloga za zamrznitev
The decision on the remedy was issued on the application for a remedy by the (please tick the relevant box):
☐ Dolžnik v postopku za izdajo evropskega naloga za zamrznitev bančnih računov
☐ Creditor in the proceedings leading to the issuing of the Preservation Order
Vloga za pritožbo zoper odločitev o pravnem sredstvu
☐ Debtor in the proceedings leading to the issuing of the Preservation Order
Vlagam pritožbo zoper odločitev iz razdelka 7 iz naslednjih razlogov:
amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014, Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014 and Delegated Regulation (EU) No 134/2014 with regard, respectively, to vehicle functional safety requirements, to vehicle construction and general requirements and to environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements
o spremembi Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 3/2014, Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 44/2014 in Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 134/2014 v zvezi z zahtevami za funkcionalno varnost vozil, zahtevami za konstrukcijo vozil in splošnimi zahtevami ter zahtevami za okoljske značilnosti in zmogljivost pogonskega sistema
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the approval and market surveillance of two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles [1], and in particular Articles 18(3), 20(2), 21(5), 22(5), 23(12), 24(3), 25(8) and 54(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 168/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. januarja 2013 o odobritvi in tržnem nadzoru dvo- ali trikolesnih vozil in štirikolesnikov [1] ter zlasti členov 18(3), 20(2), 21(5), 22(5), 23(12), 24(3), 25(8) in 54(3) Uredbe,
The Commission has kept track of issues encountered and pointed out by approval authorities and stakeholders in Regulation (EU) No 168/2013, as well as Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014 [2], Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014 [3] and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 134/2014 [4] supplementing Regulation (EU) No 168/2013; in order to ensure accurate application of those Regulations, some of the issues identified should be addressed by way of amendments.
Komisija je beležila težave, s katerimi so se homologacijski organi in deležniki spopadali in jih izpostavili v zvezi z Uredbo (EU) št. 168/2013, pa tudi z Delegirano uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 3/2014 [2], Delegirano uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 44/2014 [3] in Delegirano uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 134/2014 [4] o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 168/2013; za zagotovitev pravilne uporabe navedenih uredb bi bilo treba nekatere ugotovljene težave reševati s spremembami.
In order to ensure consistency and effectiveness of the EU type-approval system for L-category vehicles, it is necessary to continuously improve the technical requirements and test procedures set out in those delegated acts and adapt them to technical progress.
Da se zagotovita doslednost in učinkovitost sistema EU-homologacije za vozila kategorije L, je potrebno nenehno izboljševanje tehničnih zahtev in preskusnih postopkov, določenih v delegiranih aktih, in njihovo prilagajanje tehničnemu napredku.
It is also necessary improve the clarity of those delegated acts.
Poleg tega je treba izboljšati jasnost omenjenih delegiranih aktov.
The following amendments to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014 with regard to technical requirements and test procedures in the area of vehicle functional safety should be included in the Annexes to that Delegated Regulation with a view to improving its consistency and clarity: the list set out in Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014 containing the applicable UNECE regulations should be updated and its Annex XV on tyre installation should be further clarified by adding the provisions on the manufacturer declaration with respect to the permissibility of the ‘category of use’ with checks performed accordingly.
V priloge k Delegirani uredbi (EU) št. 3/2014 bi bilo treba vključiti naslednje spremembe te delegirane uredbe v zvezi s tehničnimi zahtevami in preskusnimi postopki na področju funkcionalne varnosti vozil za izboljšanje doslednosti in jasnosti: seznam, določen v Prilogi I k Delegirani uredbi (EU) št. 3/2014, ki vsebuje veljavne pravilnike UN/ECE, bi bilo treba posodobiti, Prilogo XV k navedeni uredbi o namestitvi pnevmatik pa bi bilo treba jasneje opredeliti z dodatnimi določbami o izjavi proizvajalca v zvezi z dovoljevanjem „kategorije uporabe“ ob ustrezno opravljenih preverjanjih.
Further clarifications should be added to Annex XVII to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014 regarding interior fittings, to its Annex XVIII with regard to maximum power limitation and to its Annex XIX with respect to structural integrity requirements, in particular those for powered cycles in the scope of Regulation (EU) No 168/2013.
Jasnejša pojasnila bi bilo treba dodati v Prilogo XVII k Delegirani uredbi (EU) št. 3/2014 v zvezi z notranjo opremo, Prilogo XVIII v zvezi z omejitvijo največje moči in Prilogo XIX v zvezi z zahtevami za trdnost konstrukcije, zlasti tistimi za kolesa na motorni pogon na področju uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 168/2013.
For the purposes of completeness and accuracy, it is appropriate that the list of UNECE regulations that apply on a compulsory basis set-out in Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014 includes UNECE Regulations Nos 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 16, 19, 20, 28, 37, 38, 39, 43, 46, 50, 53, 56, 57, 60, 72, 74, 75, 78, 81, 82, 87, 90, 98, 99, 112 and 113.
Zaradi popolnosti in točnosti je primerno, da seznam pravilnikov UN/ECE, ki se obvezno uporabljajo, določen v Prilogi I k Delegirani uredbi (EU) št. 3/2014, vključuje pravilnike UN/ECE št. 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 16, 19, 20, 28, 37, 38, 39, 43, 46, 50, 53, 56, 57, 60, 72, 74, 75, 78, 81, 82, 87, 90, 98, 99, 112 in 113.