natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
securities lending transactions which do not imply a transfer of full ownership of the collateral and which involve one party (the lender) lending securities to the other party (the borrower) for a fee or interest payment and in which the borrower provides the lender with collateral for the duration of the loan.
Dogovori o jamstvu se štejejo za dogovore o jamstvu v skladu s členom 76(2)(a) Direktive 2014/59/EU samo, če so pravice ali sredstva, s katerimi so povezane pravice iz naslova jamstva ali bi bile z njimi povezane ob dogodku izvršitve, ustrezno identificirana oziroma jih je mogoče ustrezno identificirati v skladu s pogoji dogovora in relevantno nacionalno zakonodajo.
Security arrangements shall qualify as security arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(a) of Directive 2014/59/EU only if the rights or assets to which the security interest is attached or would attach upon an enforcement event are sufficiently identified or identifiable in accordance with the terms of the arrangement and the applicable national law.
Člen 3
Article 3
Pogoji v zvezi z dogovori o poravnavi
Conditions relating to set-off arrangements
Dogovori o poravnavi, sklenjeni med institucijo in eno nasprotno stranko, se štejejo za dogovore o poravnavi iz člena 76(2)(c) Direktive 2014/59/EU, kadar se nanašajo na pravice in odgovornosti, ki izhajajo iz finančnih pogodb ali izvedenih finančnih instrumentov.
Set-off arrangements entered into between an institution and a single counterparty shall qualify as set-off arrangements referred to in Article 76(2)(c) of Directive 2014/59/EU where they relate to rights and liabilities arising under financial contracts or derivatives.
Dogovori o poravnavi, sklenjeni med institucijo in eno ali več nasprotnih strank, se štejejo za dogovore o poravnavi iz člena 76(2)(c) Direktive 2014/59/EU v katerih koli od naslednjih okoliščin:
Set-off arrangements entered into between an institution and one or more counterparties shall qualify as set-off arrangements referred to in Article 76(2)(c) of Directive 2014/59/EU in any of the following circumstances:
če so dogovori povezani z dejavnostjo nasprotne stranke kot centralne nasprotne stranke, zlasti z dejavnostjo jamstvenega sklada iz člena 42 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012;
where the arrangements are linked to the counterparty's activity as a central counterparty, in particular for the activity covered by a default fund as referred to Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012;
če so dogovori povezani s pravicami in obveznostmi do sistemov, kot so opredeljeni v členu 2(a) Direktive 98/26/ES, ali do drugih plačilnih sistemov ali sistemov poravnave vrednostnih papirjev in se nanašajo na njihovo dejavnost kot plačilni sistemi ali sistemi poravnave vrednostnih papirjev.
where the arrangements are related to rights and obligations towards systems as defined in Article 2(a) of Directive 98/26/EC or other payment or securities settlement systems and are linked to their activity as payment or securities settlement systems.
Organi za reševanje lahko v posameznih primerih odločijo, da se lahko dogovori o poravnavi, sklenjeni med institucijo in eno ali več nasprotnimi strankami, v kolikor se nanašajo na druge vrste pravic in obveznosti, kot so navedene v odstavkih 1 in 2, štejejo za dogovore o poravnavi v skladu s členom 76(2)(c) Direktive 2014/59/EU, če se dogovori priznajo za namene zmanjševanja tveganj v skladu z relevantnimi bonitetnimi pravili in je zaščita, zlasti na podlagi neločljivosti, pogoj za to priznanje.
Resolution authorities may decide, in individual cases, that set-off arrangements entered into between an institution and one or more counterparties so far as they relate to other types of rights and liabilities than those referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 may qualify as set-off arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(c) of Directive 2014/59/EU where the arrangements are recognised for risk mitigation purposes under the applicable prudential rules and the protection, in particular by non-separability, is a condition for that recognition.
Člen 4
Article 4
Pogoji v zvezi z dogovori o pobotu
Conditions relating to netting arrangements
Pogodbeni poboti, sklenjeni med institucijo in eno nasprotno stranko, se štejejo za dogovore o pobotu v skladu s členom 76(2)(d) Direktive 2014/59/EU, kadar se nanašajo na pravice in odgovornosti, ki izhajajo iz finančnih pogodb ali izvedenih finančnih instrumentov.
Contractual netting agreements entered into between the institution and a single counterparty shall qualify as netting arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(d) of Directive 2014/59/EU where they relate to rights and liabilities arising under financial contracts or derivatives.
Pogodbeni poboti, sklenjeni med institucijo in eno ali več nasprotnih strank, se štejejo za dogovore o pobotu v skladu s členom 76(2)(d) Direktive 2014/59/EU v katerih koli od naslednjih okoliščin:
Contractual netting agreements entered into between the institution and one or more counterparties shall qualify as netting arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(d) of Directive 2014/59/EU in any of the following circumstances:
Organi za reševanje lahko v posameznih primerih odločijo, da se dogovori o pobotu, sklenjeni med institucijo in eno ali več nasprotnih strank, lahko štejejo za dogovore o pobotu v skladu s členom 76(2)(d) Direktive 2014/59/EU, če se dogovori priznajo za namene zmanjševanja tveganj v skladu z relevantnimi bonitetnimi pravili in je zaščita, zlasti na podlagi neločljivosti, pogoj za to priznanje.
Resolution authorities may decide, in individual cases, that netting arrangements entered into between an institution and one or more counterparties may qualify as a netting arrangement pursuant to Article 76(2)(d) of Directive 2014/59/EU where they are recognised for risk mitigation purposes under the applicable prudential rules and the protection, in particular by non-separability, is a condition for that recognition.
Člen 5
Article 5
Splošni pogoji, ki se uporabljajo za dogovore o jamstvu, poravnavi in pobotu ter strukturirane finančne dogovore
General conditions applying to security arrangements, set-off and netting arrangements and structured finance arrangements
Členi 2, 3 in 4 ne posegajo v naslednja pooblastila organov za reševanje:
Articles 2, 3 and 4 are without prejudice to the following powers of the resolution authorities:
varovanje vseh vrst dogovorov, ki se lahko uvrstijo v enega od razredov iz točk (a), (c), (d) in (f) člena 76(2) Direktive 2014/59/EU in ki so v običajnih insolvenčnih postopkih zaščiteni pred začasno ali trajno ločitvijo, mirovanjem ali preklicem sredstev, pravic in obveznosti, ki spadajo v te dogovore, v skladu z nacionalnim insolvenčnim pravom, vključno z Direktivo 2001/24/ES, preneseno v nacionalno pravo;
to protect any type of arrangements which can be subsumed under one of the classes in points (a), (c), (d) and (f) of Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU, and which are protected in normal insolvency proceedings against a temporary or indefinite separation, suspension or cancellation of assets, rights and liabilities falling under these arrangements under their national insolvency law including the national transposition of Directive 2001/24/EC,
varovanje vseh vrst dogovorov, ki ne spadajo v okvir člena 76(2) Direktive 2014/59/EU in ki so v običajnih insolvenčnih postopkih zaščiteni pred začasno ali trajno ločitvijo, mirovanjem ali preklicem sredstev, pravic in obveznosti, ki spadajo v te dogovore, v skladu z nacionalnim insolvenčnim pravom, vključno z Direktivo 2001/24/ES, preneseno v nacionalno pravo.
to protect any type of arrangements which do not fall within the scope of Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU and which are protected in normal insolvency proceedings against a temporary or indefinite separation, suspension or cancellation of assets, rights and liabilities falling under these arrangements under their national insolvency law including the national transposition of Directive 2001/24/EC.
Organi za reševanje lahko v posameznih primerih iz varstva, ki ga zagotavlja člen 76(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU, izključijo dogovore o jamstvu ali dogovore o poravnavi in pobotu, ki se nanašajo na pogodbe, ki vključujejo kakršne koli klavzule, ki v primeru neizpolnjevanja finančnih obveznosti nasprotne stranke tisti nasprotni stranki, ki še naprej izpolnjuje svoje obveznosti, omogočajo, da izvaja omejena ali povsem ustavi plačila v premoženje stranke, ki ne izpolnjuje finančnih obveznosti, tudi če je slednja neto upnik.
Resolution authorities may, in individual cases, exclude from the protection afforded by Article 76(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU, security arrangements, or set-off and netting arrangements which relate to contracts including any clause which, in the event of default of a counterparty, permits a non-defaulting counterparty to make limited payments only, or no payments at all, to the estate of the defaulting party, even if the defaulting party is a net creditor.
Člen 6
Article 6
Pogoji v zvezi s strukturiranimi finančnimi dogovori, vključno z listinjenji in instrumenti, uporabljenimi za namene varovanja pred tveganjem
Conditions relating to structured finance arrangements, including securitisations and instruments used for hedging purposes
Strukturirani finančni dogovori v skladu s členom 76(2)(f) Direktive 2014/59/EU vključujejo naslednje:
Structured finance arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(f) of Directive 2014/59/EU shall include the following:
listinjenja, pri katerih so bile osnovne izpostavljenosti razvrščene v tranše in so se s popolnim prenosom lastništva prenesle iz bilance stanja originatorja na institucijo ali subjekt v postopku reševanja (listinjenje na podlagi „prave prodaje“);
securitisations in which the underlying exposures have been placed into tranches and transferred by a full title transfer from the balance sheet of the originator, to the institution or entity under resolution (true sale securitisation);
listinjenja na podlagi pogodbenih instrumentov, pri katerih sredstva, ki predstavljajo osnovo, ostanejo v bilanci stanja institucije ali subjekta v postopku reševanja (sintetično listinjenje).
securitisations by means of contractual instruments, where the underlying assets remain on the balance sheet of the institution or entity under resolution (synthetic securitisation).
Pri listinjenjih na podlagi „prave prodaje“ se kakršna koli vloga originatorja v strukturi, vključno s servisiranjem posojil, zagotavljanjem kakršne koli oblike varovanja pred tveganjem ali zagotavljanjem likvidnosti, šteje za obveznost, ki predstavlja del strukturiranih finančnih dogovorov.
In true sale securitisations, any role of the originator in the structure, including servicing the loans, providing any form of risk protection or providing liquidity, shall be considered as a liability which forms part of the structured finance arrangements.
Pri sintetičnih listinjenjih se pravica iz naslova jamstva šteje za pravico, ki predstavlja del strukturiranega finančnega dogovora, samo, če je povezana s specifičnimi sredstvi, ki so ustrezno identificirana oziroma jih je mogoče ustrezno identificirati v skladu s pogoji dogovora in relevantno nacionalno zakonodajo.
In synthetic securitisations, the security interest shall be considered as a right which forms part of the structured finance arrangements only if it is attached to specific and sufficiently identified assets or identifiable in accordance with the terms of the arrangement and the applicable national law.
Za dogovore, ki predstavljajo strukturo listinjenja, ki zajema vzajemna razmerja med originatorji, izdajatelji, skrbniki, serviserji, upravljavci denarnih sredstev ter nasprotnimi strankami v zamenjavah in poslih kreditnega zavarovanja, se šteje, da so del strukturiranih finančnih dogovorov, če so navedena vzajemna razmerja neposredno povezana s sredstvi, ki predstavljajo osnovo, in plačili, ki jih je treba izvesti na podlagi prihodkov iz teh sredstev imetnikom strukturiranih instrumentov.
Agreements constituting a securitisation structure covering mutual relationships between originators, issuers, trustees, servicers, cash managers and swap and credit protection counterparties, shall be considered as forming part of structured finance arrangements if those mutual relationships are directly linked to the underlying assets and the payments to be made from the proceeds generated by these assets to the holders of the structured instruments.
Navedena vzajemna razmerja vključujejo obveznosti in pravice, povezane s sredstvi, ki predstavljajo osnovo, obveznosti iz naslova izdanih instrumentov in dogovore o jamstvu, vključno s transakcijami z izvedenimi finančnimi instrumenti, potrebnimi za ohranjanje toka plačil v okviru teh obveznosti.
Those mutual relationships include liabilities and rights related to the underlying assets, liabilities under the instruments issued, and security arrangements, including derivative transactions, required for maintaining the flow of payments under these liabilities.
Odstavek 2 ne posega v pooblastilo organa za reševanje, da na podlagi posameznih primerov in ob upoštevanju specifične strukture strukturiranega finančnega dogovora v skladu s členom 76(2)(f) Direktive 2014/59/EU odloči, da so del takega strukturiranega finančnega dogovora tudi drugi dogovori med strankami iz odstavka 2, kot so dogovori o servisiranju posojila, ki niso neposredno povezani s sredstvi, ki predstavljajo osnovo, in plačili, ki jih je treba izvesti.
Paragraph 2 shall be without prejudice to the power of the resolution authority to decide, on a case-by-case basis and having regard to the specific structure of the structured finance arrangement pursuant to Article 76(2)(f) of Directive 2014/59/EU, that other agreements between the parties referred to in paragraph 2, such as loan servicing agreements, which are not directly linked to the underlying assets and the payments to be made, form part of such structured finance arrangement.
Člen 7
OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190.
Direktiva 98/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 1998 o dokončnosti poravnave pri plačilih in sistemih poravnave vrednostnih papirjev (UL L 166, 11.6.1998, str. 45).
Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems (OJ L 166, 11.6.1998, p. 45).
Uredba (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. julija 2012 o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, centralnih nasprotnih strankah in repozitorijih sklenjenih poslov (UL L 201, 27.7.2012, str. 1).
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1).
Direktiva 2001/24/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. aprila 2001 o reorganizaciji in prenehanju kreditnih institucij (UL L 125, 5.5.2001, str. 15).
Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions (OJ L 125, 5.5.2001, p. 15).
Uredba (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o bonitetnih zahtevah za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 (UL L 176, 27.6.2013, str. 1).
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
Potreba po določitvi obsega dogovorov, ki bi se v nekaterih primerih varovali z zaščitnimi ukrepi, iz člena 76(2) Direktive 2014/59/EU, na splošno ne bi smela preprečevati organom za reševanje, da zaščitijo kateri koli razred dogovorov, ki se lahko uvrsti v eno od kategorij iz navedenega člena in ki je v insolvenčnih postopkih zaščiten pred ločitvijo sredstev, pravic in obveznosti, ki spadajo v te dogovore, v skladu z nacionalnim insolvenčnim pravom, vključno s preneseno Direktivo 2001/24/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4]..
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/868
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/868
of 19 May 2017
z dne 19. maja 2017
Done at Brussels, 19 May 2017.
V Bruslju, 19. maja 2017
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/870
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/870
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Kopi Arabika Gayo (PGI))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Kopi Arabika Gayo (ZGO))
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Indonesia's application to register the name ‘Kopi Arabika Gayo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je bil zahtevek Indonezije za registracijo imena „Kopi Arabika Gayo“ objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kopi Arabika Gayo’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Ker v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Komisija ni prejela nobenega ugovora, bi bilo treba ime „Kopi Arabika Gayo“ registrirati –
The name ‘Kopi Arabika Gayo’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
Ime „Kopi Arabika Gayo“ (ZGO) se registrira.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 15. maja 2017
Done at Brussels, 15 May 2017.
V imenu predsednika
Member of the Commission
UL C 403, 1.11.2016, str. 5.
OJ C 403, 1.11.2016, p. 5.
Ime iz prvega odstavka opredeljuje proizvod skupine 1.8 Ostali proizvodi iz Priloge I k Pogodbi (začimbe itn.) iz Priloge XI k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 [3].Člen 2
amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of phosphoric acid — phosphates — di — tri — and polyphosphates (E 338-452) in certain meat preparations
o spremembi Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede uporabe fosforjeve (V) kisline – fosfatov – di-, tri- in polifosfatov (E 338–452) v nekaterih mesnih pripravkih
On 11 May 2015 an application was submitted by the Czech Republic for the authorisation of the use of phosphoric acid, phosphates, diphosphates, triphosphates and polyphosphates (‘phosphates’) as a stabiliser in the following Czech meat preparations: Bílá klobása, Vinná klobása, Sváteční klobása and Syrová klobása.
Češka je 11. maja 2015 predložila zahtevek za izdajo dovoljenja za uporabo fosforjeve (V) kisline – fosfatov – di-, tri- in polifosfatov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: fosfati) kot stabilizatorja v naslednjih čeških mesnih pripravkih: Bílá klobása, Vinná klobása, Sváteční klobása in Syrová klobása.
The use of phosphates is required to maintain the physico-chemical state and to increase the binding capacity of meat preparations such as Bílá klobása, Vinná klobása, Sváteční klobása and Syrová klobása, in particular when they are placed on the market in a packaging with protective atmosphere and with an extended shelf-life.
Uporaba fosfatov je potrebna za ohranitev fizikalno-kemijskega stanja in povečanje vezljivosti mesnih pripravkov, kot so Bílá klobása, Vinná klobása, Sváteční klobása in Syrová klobása, zlasti kadar so dani v promet pakirani v zaščitni atmosferi in s podaljšanim rokom uporabnosti.
According to the applicant, the technological need for those additives in the relevant Czech meat preparations is similar to that in breakfast sausages and Bräte, for which the use of phosphates is authorised in Part E of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 in food category 08.2 ‘Meat preparations as defined by Regulation (EC) No 853/2004’.
Predlagateljica zahtevka navaja, da je tehnološka potreba po navedenih aditivih v zadevnih čeških mesnih pripravkih podobna kot pri breakfast sausages in Bräte, pri katerih je uporaba fosfatov dovoljena v delu E Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 za kategorijo živil 08.2 „Mesni pripravki, kot so opredeljeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004“.
Therefore, it is appropriate to maintain certain traditional products on the market in some Member States, provided that the use of food additives in those products complies with the general and specific conditions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008.
Zato je nekatere tradicionalne proizvode primerno ohraniti v prometu v nekaterih državah članicah, če je v navedenih proizvodih uporaba aditivov za živila v skladu s splošnimi in posebnimi pogoji iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1333/2008.
In order to ensure uniform application of the use of additives covered by the present Regulation, the relevant Czech meat preparations will be described in a guidance document describing the food categories in Part E of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives [3].
Za zagotovitev enotne uporabe aditivov, zajetih v tej uredbi, se zadevni češki mesni pripravki opišejo v smernicah z opisom kategorij živil iz dela E Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 o aditivih za živila [3].
Pursuant to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008, the Commission has to seek the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) in order to update the Union list of food additives set out in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, except where the update in question is not liable to have an effect on human health.
V skladu s členom 3(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1331/2008 mora Komisija za posodobitev seznama Unije aditivov za živila iz Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 zaprositi za mnenje Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija), razen če zadevna posodobitev verjetno ne bo imela učinka na zdravje ljudi.
The use of phosphates as food additives is authorised in a wide variety of foods.
Uporaba fosfatov kot aditivov za živila je dovoljena v široki paleti živil.
Their safety was evaluated by the Scientific Committee for Food which established the Maximum Tolerable Daily Intake of 70 mg/kg body weight expressed as phosphorus [4].
Njihovo varnost je ocenil Znanstveni odbor za hrano, ki je določil največji dopustni dnevni vnos 70 mg/kg telesne teže, izražen kot fosfor [4].
Since the application for the extension of use of phosphates is limited to a few specific products that have been traditionally used it is not expected that the extension will have a significant impact on the overall exposure to phosphates.
Ker je zahtevek za razširitev uporabe fosfatov omejen na le nekaj posebnih proizvodov, ki se tradicionalno uporabljajo, se ne pričakuje, da bo imela razširitev znatne učinke na skupno izpostavljenost fosfatom.
Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food, Twenty-fifth series (page 13), 1991.
Poročila Znanstvenega odbora za hrano, petindvajseta serija (stran 13), 1991.
In Part E of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, in food category 08.2 ‘Meat preparations as defined by Regulation (EC) No 853/2004’, the entry for phosphoric acid — phosphates — di — tri — and polyphosphates (E 338-452) is replaced by the following:
V kategoriji živil 08.2 „Mesni pripravki, kot so opredeljeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004“ v delu E Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 se vnos za fosforjevo (V) kislino – fosfate – di-, tri- in polifosfate (E 338-452) nadomesti z naslednjim:
Phosphoric acid — phosphates — di — tri — and polyphosphates
fosforjeva (V) kislina – fosfati – di-, tri- in polifosfati
only breakfast sausages: in this product, the meat is minced in such a way so that the muscle and fat tissue are completely dispersed, so that fibre makes an emulsion with the fat, giving the product its typical appearance; Finnish grey salted Christmas ham, burger meat with a minimum vegetable and/or cereal content of 4 % mixed within the meat, Kasseler, Bräte, Surfleisch, toorvorst, šašlõkk, ahjupraad, Bílá klobása, Vinná klobása, Sváteční klobása and Syrová klobása’
samo breakfast sausages: v tem proizvodu je meso zmleto tako, da se mišice in mast v celoti razpršijo, tako da vlakna tvorijo emulzijo z mastjo, kar daje proizvodu tipičen videz; finska slana božična šunka, burger meat z vsebnostjo zelenjave in/ali žit, zmešanih med meso, vsaj 4 %, Kasseler, Bräte, Surfleisch, toorvorst, šašlõkk, ahjupraad, Bílá klobása, Vinná klobása, Sváteční klobása in Syrová klobása“