natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, it is recalled that, as indicated in recital 46 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, the Comorian authorities were prior to this Decision already aware that vessels flying their flag were, in breach of the Comorian law and requirements, operating outside the Comorian EEZ and had not taken enforcement measures in respect of those vessels.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 67 in 72 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015, stopnje razvoja Komorov ni mogoče obravnavati kot dejavnika, ki bi zmanjševal zmogljivost pristojnih organov v zvezi s sodelovanjem z drugimi državami in sprejemanjem izvršilnih ukrepov.
It also contravenes the recommendations to take enforcement measures in respect of IUU fishing activities and to sanction such activities with sufficient severity to effectively prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing and to deprive offenders of the benefits accruing from such fishing, as set out in paragraph 8(2)(7) of the FAO Code of Conduct, point 21 of the IPOA IUU and points 31 to 33, 35 and 38 of the FAO Voluntary Guidelines for Flag State Performance.
Komisija na podlagi uvodnih izjav od 37 do 54 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 ter dogajanj po 1. oktobra 2015 ter v skladu s členom 31(3) ter členom 31(5)(b), (c) in (d) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu meni, da Komori niso izpolnili dolžnosti v zvezi s prizadevanji za sodelovanje in izvrševanje, ki so jim bile kot državi zastave, pristanišča, obalni državi in državi trga naložene z mednarodnim pravom.
It is noted that the Comorian fisheries legal framework is still based on the Fisheries and Aquaculture Code established by Act No 07-011/AU of 29 August 2007 and the Decree No 15-050/PR of 15 April 2015 in force at the time of Decision of 1 October 2015.
Neizvajanje mednarodnih pravil (člen 31(6) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu)
It is also recalled that recitals 49 and 50 of that Decision established that: (i) the Comorian authorities acknowledged that further implementing texts of the Fisheries and Aquaculture Code needed to be elaborated to ensure consistency between national law and international and regional applicable rules; (ii) the Comorian Fisheries and Aquaculture Code does not include vessels conducting fishing related activities in the definition of fishing vessels; and (iii) while the Comorian legal framework covers serious violations as defined under international law, it does not explicitly define IUU fishing and does not expressly foresee enforcement measures and sanctions for nationals supporting or engaged in IUU fishing as outlined in points 18 and 21 of the IPOA IUU.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od 57 do 60 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015, je Komisija analizirala podatke, ki jih šteje za pomembne in so na voljo v objavljenih podatkih regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva (RFMO), zlasti Komisije za tune v Indijskem oceanu (IOTC) in Komisije za ribištvo jugozahodnega Indijskega oceana (SWIOFC).
It is also recalled that recital 50 of the Decision of 1 October 2015 established that, as regards the sanctioning system, fines foreseen in the context of industrial fishing activities are based on the value of the licences fees.
Komisija je po sprejetju Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 opravila tudi analizo podatkov, ki jih šteje za pomembne glede na status Komorov kot pogodbenice Komisije za tune v Indijskem oceanu (IOTC) in Komisije za ribištvo jugozahodnega Indijskega oceana (SWIOFC).
Nevertheless, the categories of fishing licences defined in the Comorian law are limited only to tuna species.
Opozoriti je treba, da so v uvodnih izjavah 57 in 58 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 navedene ponavljajoče in neponavljajoče se težave Komorov v zvezi s skladnostjo z resolucijami Komisije za tune v Indijskem oceanu (IOTC), ki so bile ugotovljene za leto 2014 v Poročilu IOTC o skladnosti za Komore z dne 25. marca 2015 [4].
Consequently, in cases of infringements of industrial fleet targeting other species there are no corresponding fines, in view of the lack of corresponding licencing fees.
V skladu z informacijami iz Poročila IOTC o skladnosti za Komore z dne 16. aprila 2016 [5] je bilo leta 2015 ugotovljenih več ponavljajočih se težav v zvezi s skladnostjo.
This situation reduces the level of deterrence of the Comorian sanctioning system and does not allow the Comorian authorities to sanction IUU fishing activities with sufficient severity to effectively prevent, deter and eliminate these activities and to deprive offenders of the benefits accruing from their illegal activities.
Komori so zlasti samo delno izpolnjevali zahteve glede: (i) predložitve agregiranih statističnih podatkov o nominalnem ulovu morskih psov, kot zahteva Resolucija 05/05; (ii) predložitve agregiranih statističnih podatkov o ulovu in naporu za morske pse, kot zahteva Resolucija 05/05, in (iii) predložitve agregiranih statističnih podatkov o pogostosti velikosti za morske pse, kot zahteva Resolucija 05/05.
It is noted that the Comorian authorities in charge of fisheries presented to the Commission draft amendments to the provisions of the Fisheries and Aquaculture Code established by Act No 07-011/AU of 29 August 2007 and of the Decree No 15-050/PR of 15 April 2015.
Komori niso predložili niti podatkov o pokritju z orodjem za iztovarjanje ulova malega ribolova, kot zahteva Resolucija 11/04.
During its visit in August 2016, the Commission however established the revision process is affected by the inadequate administrative environment.
V istem poročilu so opredeljene tudi neponavljajoče se težave v zvezi s skladnostjo.
The Commission also found part of the Comorian administration considered the revision process as an opportunity to bolster the flag of convenience policy of the Comoros.
Komori niso predložili niti podatkov o prepovedi v zvezi z oceanskimi beloplavutimi morskimi psi, kot zahteva Resolucija 13/06, niti podatkov o izvajanju smernic FAO za morske želve, kot zahteva Resolucija 12/04.
Therefore, the Commission finds that the legal framework is still inadequate in terms of compliance with international and regional applicable rules.
Težave v zvezi s skladnostjo, ki jih imajo Komori z resolucijami IOTC, kažejo na neizpolnjevanje obveznosti, ki jih Komorom kot državi zastave nalaga člen 94 UNLCOS.
On the basis of the information gathered from the Comorian authorities as well as during its visit in August 2016, the Commission found that many obligations foreseen under Comorian law are still not implemented and enforced by the Comoros (e.g. obligation to transmit vessel monitoring system information and report catch data, restrictions on the area of operation of Comorian vessels, etc.).
Kažejo tudi, da Komori ne upoštevajo priporočil iz točk od 31 do 33, 35 in 38 prostovoljnih smernic FAO o uspešnosti države zastave in točke 24 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
As stated in recital 47 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, this situation highlights the authorities' inability to monitor the operations of Comorian vessels and undermines the authorities' ability to effectively enforce rules applicable to the different areas concerned.
Z izjemo IOTC in SWIOFC Komori niso pogodbenica drugih regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva.
Furthermore, no progress has been made as regards the facts described in recital 51 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, concerning the lack of a national inspection plan to ensure a coherent policy on control of the Comorian fleet operations, and the insufficient number of observers.
Ob upoštevanju strukture komorske flote, ki ne opravlja dejavnosti samo v regiji Indijskega oceana, ta ugotovitev zmanjšuje prizadevanja Komorov, da bi izpolnjevali obveznosti v skladu s konvencijo UNCLOS, zlasti členoma 117 in 118.
During its visit in August 2016, the Commission found that, notwithstanding an admission from the Comorian authorities regarding their lack of capacity to monitor and control the fishing and fishing-related activities of the Comorian fleet wherever it operates and the foreign fleet operating within the Comorian EEZ, there was still an intention to pursue an expansion of the fleet strategy.
Poleg tega Komori niso ratificirali drugih mednarodnih pravnih instrumentov v zvezi z upravljanjem ribištva, razen konvencije UNCLOS.
As highlighted in recitals 67 to 72 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, the level of development of Comoros cannot be considered as a factor undermining the capacity of the competent authorities to cooperate with other countries and pursue enforcement actions.
Ob upoštevanju pomembnosti čezconskih in izrazito selivskih staležev rib za Komore ta ugotovitev zmanjšuje prizadevanja Komorov, da bi izpolnjevali svoje obveznosti kot država zastave, obalna država, država pristanišča in trga v skladu s konvencijo UNCLOS, zlasti členoma 63 in 64 Konvencije.
The evaluation of the specific constraints emanating from the Comorian level of development is further described in recitals 88 to 93 of the present Decision.
Ravnanje Komorov pri izvajanju mednarodnih instrumentov ni v skladu s priporočili iz točke 11 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, ki države prednostno spodbujajo k ratifikaciji, sprejemu ali pristopu k Sporazumu Združenih narodov o uporabi določb konvencije UNCLOS glede ohranjanja in upravljanja čezconskih staležev rib in izrazito selivskih staležev rib (UNFSA) in k Sporazumu FAO o usklajevanju.
In view of recitals 37 to 54 of the Decision of 1 October 2015 and the developments after 1 October 2015, the Commission takes the view, pursuant to Article 31(3) and Article 31(5)(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the IUU Regulation, that the Comoros has failed to discharge the duties incumbent upon it under international law as a flag, coastal, port and market State in respect of cooperation and enforcement efforts.
Prav tako ne upoštevajo točke 14, ki določa, da države v celoti in učinkovito izvajajo Kodeks ravnanja in z njim povezane mednarodne akcijske načrte.
Failure to implement international rules (Article 31(6) of the IUU Regulation).
Komori niso ratificirali niti sporazuma FAO o ukrepih države pristanišča iz leta 2009.
As described in the recitals 57 to 60 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, the Commission analysed information deemed relevant from available data published by Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs), in particular the IOTC and the Southwest Indian Ocean Fisheries Commission (SWIOFC).
Komori v nasprotju s priporočili iz točk od 25 do 27 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova doslej niso pripravili nacionalnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
In addition, the Commission carried out an analysis on the information deemed relevant with respect to the status of the Comoros as contracting party to the IOTC and the SWIOFC following the Decision of 1 October 2015.
Komisija je na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih zbrali komorski organi, ugotovila, da je upravljanje registra komorske ribiške flote in flote, povezane z ribištvom, še vedno delno preneseno na zasebno podjetje s sedežem zunaj Komorov.
It is recalled that recitals 57 and 58 of the Decision of 1 October 2015 described the repeated and non-repeated compliance issues of the Comoros with IOTC Resolutions identified for 2014 in the IOTC Compliance Report for the Comoros produced on 25 March 2015 [4].
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zbrala Komisija, in izjav Komorov je bilo ugotovljeno, da Komori niso zagotovili, da imajo plovila, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo, dejansko povezavo z njimi.
According to information derived from the IOTC Compliance Report for the Comoros produced on 16 April 2016 [5], several repeated compliance issues were identified in 2015.
To je v nasprotju s členom 91 konvencije UNCLOS, ki določa, da mora obstajati dejanska povezava med državo zastave in njenimi ladjami.
In particular, the Comoros only partially complied with the requirements to: (i) provide aggregated statistics on nominal catch for sharks, as required by Resolution 05/05; (ii) provide aggregated statistics on catch and effort for sharks, as required by Resolution 05/05; and (iii) provide aggregated statistics on size frequency for sharks, as required by Resolution 05/05.
Komisija na podlagi uvodnih izjav od 55 do 65 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 in dogajanj po 1. oktobra 2015 ter v skladu s členom 31(3) in (6) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu meni, da Komori niso izpolnili svojih dolžnosti v zvezi z mednarodnimi pravili, predpisi ter ukrepi za ohranjanje in upravljanje, ki so jim bile naložene z mednarodnim pravom.
The Comoros has also not provided any information on coverage by gear for artisanal landings, as required by Resolution 11/04.
Posebne omejitve držav v razvoju (člen 31(7) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu)
Non-repeated compliance issues were also identified in the same report.
Po podatkih indeksa človekovega razvoja Združenih narodov (UNHDI) imajo Komori nizek indeks človekovega razvoja in so bili leta 2014 [6] na 159. mestu med 188 državami.
The Comoros has not provided any information on the ban on oceanic whitetip sharks, as required by Resolution 13/06 and has not provided any information on the implementation of FAO guidelines on marine turtles, as required by Resolution 12/04.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da so Komori po Uredbi (ES) št. 1905/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7] uvrščeni v kategorijo najmanj razvitih držav [8].
The compliance issues of the Comoros with IOTC Resolutions demonstrates the failure of the Comoros to fulfil its obligations as flag State laid down in Article 94 of Unclos.
Dokazov, ki bi potrdili, da so razlog za neizpolnjevanje dolžnosti, ki so bile Komorom naložene z mednarodnim pravom, razvojne ovire, ni bilo mogoče najti.
They also show that the Comoros is not following the recommendations of points 31 to 33, 35 and 38 of FAO Voluntary Guidelines for Flag States Performance and of point 24 of the IPOA IUU.
Čeprav lahko na splošno obstajajo posebne omejitve zmogljivosti glede spremljanja, nadzora in obvladovanja, posebne omejitve Komorov, ki izhajajo iz njihove stopnje razvoja, ne morejo upravičiti pomanjkljivosti, opredeljenih v prejšnjih oddelkih.
With the exception of IOTC and SWIOFC, the Comoros is not a contracting party to other RFMOs.
To se nanaša zlasti na status komorskega registra in popolno odsotnost nadzora dela komorske flote.
Considering the structure of the Comorian fleet, which operates not only in the Indian Ocean region, this finding undermines the Comorian efforts to fulfil obligations under Unclos, in particular Articles 117 and 118 thereof.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 69 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015, se zdi, da ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti izvirajo predvsem iz neustreznega upravnega okolja ter nezadostnega notranjega sodelovanja in izmenjave informacij v komorski upravi, da bi se zagotovilo učinkovito in uspešno izpolnjevanje dolžnosti Komorov kot države zastave, obalne države, države pristanišča in trga.
Moreover, with the exception of Unclos, the Comoros has not ratified other international legal instruments related to fisheries management.
To stanje je še slabše zaradi neuravnotežene velikosti komorske ribiške flote in flote, povezane z ribištvom, ter njenega območja opravljanja dejavnosti.
Considering the importance of straddling and highly migratory fish stocks for the Comoros, this finding undermines the Comorian efforts to fulfil its duties as flag, coastal, port and market State under Unclos, in particular Articles 63 and 64 thereof.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da sta Evropska unija in Komori podpisali sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju [9].
The performance of the Comoros in implementing international instruments is also not in accordance with the recommendations of point 11 of the IPOA IUU which encourages States, as a matter of priority, to ratify, accept or accede to the United Nations Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of Unclos relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (UNFSA) and the FAO Compliance Agreement.
Zadnji protokol [10] tega sporazuma vključuje finančno podporo sektorju v okviru finančnega prispevka za Komore.
It also fails to follow point 14 that provides that States should fully and effectively implement the Code of Conduct and its associated International Plans of Action.
Cilj finančne podpore sektorju je spodbujati trajnostni razvoj ribištva s krepitvijo upravnih in znanstvenih zmogljivosti, pri čemer je poudarek na trajnostnem upravljanju, spremljanju, nadzoru in obvladovanju ribištva.
The Comoros also has not ratified the 2009 FAO Port State Measures Agreement.
To bi moralo pomagati Komorom kot državi zastave, pristanišča, obalni državi in državi trga pri izpolnjevanju njihovih obveznosti v skladu z mednarodnim pravom in pri preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
Contrary to the recommendations of points 25 to 27 of the IPOA IUU, the Comoros has, to date, not developed a national plan of action against IUU fishing.
Poleg tega Komorom zagotavljajo podporo regionalne pobude, kot je projekt SmartFish, ki ga financira Evropska unija in izvaja Komisija za Indijski ocean (IOC), njegov cilj pa je med drugim boj proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu s pomočjo skupnih virov, izmenjave informacij, usposabljanja in razvoj operativnih sistemov za spremljanje, nadzor in obvladovanje; ter projekt upravljanja ribištva v jugozahodnem Indijskem oceanu v okviru prvega projekta Svetovne banke Skupna rast, ki je namenjen izboljšanju učinkovitosti upravljanja izbranih prednostnih nalog na področju ribištva na regionalni in nacionalni ravni ter na ravni skupnosti.
From the information gathered from the Comorian authorities, the Commission found that the management of the register of the Comorian fishing and fishing-related fleet remains partly delegated to private legal persons located outside the Comoros.
Komisija na podlagi ugotovitev iz tega oddelka, pripravljenih na podlagi dejanskih elementov, ki jih je zbrala, in tudi podatkov, ki so jih predložili Komori, meni, da je v skladu s členom 31(7) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu primerno upoštevati določene omejitve Komorov glede na njihovo stopnjo razvoja, ki lahko negativno vpliva na splošno ravnanje Komorov pri upravljanju ribištva.
Based on the information gathered by the Commission as well as statements made by the Comoros, it was established that the Comoros failed to ensure that vessels flying its flag have a genuine link with the country.
Vendar je bilo ob upoštevanju vrste ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti Komorov ugotovljeno, da stopnja razvoja ne more v celoti upravičiti ali drugače utemeljiti njihovega splošnega ravnanja kot države zastave, pristanišča, obalne države ali države trge glede ribolova ter neustreznosti njihovih ukrepov za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega in za njegovo odpravljanje.
This contravenes Article 91 of Unclos which provides that a genuine link must exist between the flag State and its ships.
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV O OPREDELITVI NESODELUJOČE TRETJE DRŽAVE
In view of the recitals 55 to 65 of the Decision of 1 October 2015 and the developments after 1 October 2015, the Commission takes the view, pursuant to Article 31(3) and (6) of the IUU Regulation, that the Comoros has failed to discharge the duties incumbent upon it under international law with respect to international rules, regulations as well as conservation and management measures.
Na podlagi navedenih ugotovitev v zvezi z neizpolnjevanjem dolžnosti Komorov, ki so jim z mednarodnim pravom naložene kot državi zastave, pristanišča, obalni državi ali državi trga, ter nesprejetjem ukrepov za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje bi bilo treba Komore v skladu s členom 31 uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu opredeliti kot državo, ki jo Komisija obravnava kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu.
Specific constraints of developing countries (Article 31(7) of the IUU Regulation)
Pristojni organi držav članic ob upoštevanju člena 18(1)(g) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu zavrnejo uvoz ribiških proizvodov v Unijo, ne da bi jim bilo treba zahtevati kakršne koli dodatne dokaze ali pošiljati prošnjo za pomoč državi zastave, ko ugotovijo, da so potrdilo o ulovu potrdili organi države zastave, ki je opredeljena kot nesodelujoča država v skladu s členom 31 navedene uredbe.
It is recalled that the Comoros has a low human development index and was ranked 159 out of 188 countries in 2014 [6] according to the United Nations Human Development Index (UNHDI).
Navesti bi bilo treba, da opredelitev Komorov kot države, ki jo Komisija obravnava kot nesodelujočo državo, ne izključuje poznejših ukrepov, ki jih lahko Komisija ali Svet sprejme za pripravo seznama nesodelujočih držav.
It is also recalled that Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [7] listed the Comoros in the category of least developed countries [8].
POSTOPEK ODBORA
No corroborating evidence has been found to suggest that the failure of the Comoros to discharge its duties under international law is the result of development constraints.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za ribištvo in ribogojstvo –
Although specific capacity constraints may exist in general with respect to monitoring, control and surveillance, the specific constraints of the Comoros derived from its level of development cannot justify the deficiencies identified in the previous sections.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
This concerns especially the status of the Comorian register and the total absence of control of a part of the Comorian fleet.
Člen 1
As stated in recital 69 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, it appears that the shortcomings identified result primarily from the inadequate administrative environment and lack of cooperation and information sharing within the Comorian administration to ensure the efficient and effective performance of the Comorian duties as flag, coastal, port and market State.
Komori se opredelijo kot tretja država, ki jo Komisija obravnava kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu.
This situation is aggravated by the imbalanced size of the Comorian fishing and fishing-related fleet and its area of operation.
Člen 2
It is also recalled that the European Union and the Comoros have signed a Fisheries Partnership Agreement [9].
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The last protocol [10] of this agreement included sectoral financial support in the financial contribution paid to the Comoros.
V Bruslju, 23. maja 2017
The sectoral financial support aimed to promote sustainable fisheries development by strengthening administrative and scientific capacity through a focus on sustainable fisheries management, monitoring, control and surveillance.
Za Komisijo
This should have contributed to helping the Comoros to meet its duties under international law as flag, port, coastal and market State and to fight IUU fishing.
Predsednik
Moreover, the Comoros also gets support from regional initiatives such as the project SmartFish which is funded by the European Union and which is implemented by the Indian Ocean Commission (IOC) and aims, inter alia, to fight IUU fishing through shared resources; information exchange; training and the development of operational schemes for monitoring, control and surveillance; and the First South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Governance and Shared Growth Project of the World Bank which aims to improve the management effectiveness of selected priority fisheries at the regional, national and community level.
UL L 286, 29.10.2008, str. 1.