natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Initiation of an expiry review and a partial interim review
Začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa in delnega vmesnega pregleda
On 28 May 2015, the Commission initiated an expiry review of the measures in force on imports into the Union of silicon originating in the PRC and published a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [4].
Komisija je 28. maja 2015 začela pregled zaradi izteka veljavnih ukrepov v zvezi z uvozom silicija s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo in objavila obvestilo o začetku v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4].
On 1 September 2015, the Commission initiated a partial interim review limited to injury with regard to imports into the Union of silicon originating in the PRC and published a separate Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [5].
Komisija je 1. septembra 2015 začela delni vmesni pregled, omejen na škodo v zvezi z uvozom silicija s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo, in objavila ločeno obvestilo o začetku v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5].
In the Notice of Initiation of the expiry review, the Commission invited interested parties to participate in the investigation.
V obvestilu o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa je Komisija povabila zainteresirane strani k sodelovanju v preiskavi.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed known Union producers, the known exporting producers, the Chinese authorities, known importers and users about the initiation of the review and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je Komisija izrecno obvestila znane proizvajalce Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike, kitajske organe, znane uvoznike in uporabnike o začetku pregleda ter jih povabila k sodelovanju.
The Commission also stated that it envisaged using the United States of America (‘the USA’) as a third market economy country (‘analogue country’), as proposed by the applicant, within the meaning of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je tudi objavila, da namerava uporabiti Združene države Amerike („ZDA“) kot tretjo državo s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“), kot je predlagal vložnik v smislu člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, the Commission also informed the authorities and the producer in the USA about the initiation and invited them to participate.
Zato je Komisija o začetku obvestila tudi organe in proizvajalca v ZDA in jih povabila k sodelovanju.
The Commission also sent notices to the authorities in Australia, Brazil, Norway, Russia, South Africa and Thailand notifying them of the initiation of the investigation and requesting information on production and sale of silicon in those countries.
Komisija je poslala obvestila tudi organom v Avstraliji, Braziliji, na Norveškem, v Rusiji, Južni Afriki in na Tajskem, v katerih jih je obvestila o začetku preiskave in zahtevala informacije o proizvodnji in prodaji silicija v teh državah.
Letters were then sent to all known producers of silicon in these countries asking for their cooperation with the review and enclosing a questionnaire.
Nato so bila vsem znanim proizvajalcem silicija v teh državah poslana pisma, v katerih so bili povabljeni k sodelovanju pri pregledu, priložen pa je bil tudi vprašalnik.
In the Notice of Initiation of the partial interim review, the Commission invited interested parties to participate in the investigation.
V obvestilu o začetku delnega vmesnega pregleda je Komisija povabila zainteresirane strani k sodelovanju v preiskavi.
In addition, the Commission informed known Union producers, the known exporting producers, the Chinese authorities, known importers and users about the initiation of the review and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je Komisija obvestila znane proizvajalce Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike, kitajske organe, znane uvoznike in uporabnike o začetku pregleda ter jih povabila k sodelovanju.
Interested parties had an opportunity to comment on the initiation of these investigations and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da predložijo pripombe o začetku teh preiskav in zahtevajo zaslišanje pred Komisijo in/ali pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih.
In both Notices of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample exporting producers and importers in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v obeh obvestilih o začetku navedla, da bo morda izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov in uvoznikov v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
One unrelated importer provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
En nepovezan uvoznik je predložil zahtevane informacije in se strinjal z vključitvijo v vzorec.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all exporting producers in the PRC to provide all information specified in the expiry Notice of Initiation.
Komisija je pozvala vse proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, naj predložijo vse informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, da bi se odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec.
Eleven Chinese exporting producers and two traders provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Enajst kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in dva trgovca sta predložila zahtevane informacije in se strinjala z vključitvijo v vzorec.
The Commission originally proposed a sample of three exporting producers, based on the largest volume of exports that could be verified in the time available.
Na podlagi največje količine izvoza, ki jo je bilo mogoče preveriti v času, ki je bil na voljo, je Komisija na začetku predlagala vzorec treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
During consultations on this sample one of the three companies withdrew its cooperation, and therefore it was replaced by two smaller exporting producers, making the final sample four exporting producers out of the ten cooperating.
Med posvetovanji o tem vzorcu je ena od treh družb odstopila od sodelovanja, zato sta jo nadomestila dva manjša proizvajalca izvoznika, kar pomeni, da so bili v končnem vzorcu štirje proizvajalci izvozniki od desetih sodelujočih.
The same ten exporting producers came forward in the sampling exercise for the partial interim review and therefore the same sample of companies was selected.
Istih deset proizvajalcev izvoznikov se je javilo za vzorčenje za delni vmesni pregled, zato je bil izbran isti vzorec družb.
Replies to questionnaires
Izpolnjeni vprašalniki
The Commission sent questionnaires to the Union industry, the importer and the sampled exporting producers and received replies from all of them.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike industriji Unije, uvozniku in vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom ter od vseh prejela odgovore.
Three replies were received to the analogue country questionnaire from producers in Norway, Russia and the USA.
Prejeti so bili trije odgovori na vprašalnik za primerljive države, in sicer od proizvajalcev na Norveškem, v Rusiji in v ZDA.
Verification visits under Article 16 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Preveritveni obiski v skladu s členom 16 osnovne uredbe so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih družb:
FerroAtlántica S.L., Madrid, Spain
FerroAtlántica S.L., Madrid, Španija
Ferropem, Chambéry, France
FERROPEM, Chambéry, Francija
RW silicium GmbH, Pocking, Germany
RW silicium GmbH, Pocking, Nemčija
Stanchem Sp.J., Lublin, Poland
Stanchem Sp.J., Lublin, Poljska
Dow Corning Limited, Barry, UK
Dow Corning Limited, Barry, Združeno kraljestvo
Raffmetal SpA, Casto, Italy
RAFFMETAL SPA, Casto, Italija
Trimet Aluminium SE, Essen, Germany
TRIMET Aluminium SE, Essen, Nemčija
Wacker Chemie AG, Munich, Germany
Wacker Chemie AG, München, Nemčija
Globe Specialty Metals, Miami, Florida, USA
Globe Specialty Metals, Miami, Florida, ZDA
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015 (‘the review investigation period’).
V preiskavi dampinga in škode je bilo zajeto obdobje od 1. aprila 2014 do 31. marca 2015 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2011 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, je potekalo v obdobju od 1. januarja 2011 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is silicon currently falling within CN code 28046900 originating in the PRC (‘the product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek je silicij, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN 28046900, s poreklom iz LRK („zadevni izdelek“).
the product produced and sold on the domestic market of the USA, which was selected as analogue country; and
izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu v ZDA, ki so bile izbrane kot primerljiva država; in
Likelihood of recurrence or continuation of dumping
Verjetnost ponovitve ali nadaljevanja dampinga
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether dumping was currently taking place and whether dumping was likely to continue or recur upon a possible expiry of the measures in force on imports from the PRC.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila, ali je damping trenutno prisoten in ali obstaja verjetnost, da se nadaljuje ali ponovno pojavi zaradi morebitnega izteka veljavnih ukrepov za uvoz iz LRK.
Normal value and analogue country
Normalna vrednost in primerljiva država
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation normal value was determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged using the USA as an appropriate analogue country, as proposed by Euroalliages, and invited interested parties to comment.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da namerava uporabiti ZDA kot primerno primerljivo državo, kot je predlagal Euroalliages, in jih pozvala, da predložijo pripombe.
The Commission asked producers of the like product in the USA, Norway, Brazil, Russia, Thailand, South Africa, and Australia to provide information.
Komisija je pozvala proizvajalce podobnega izdelka v ZDA, na Norveškem, v Braziliji, Rusiji, na Tajskem, v Južni Afriki in v Avstraliji, naj predložijo informacije.
Eusmet commented that the USA was not an appropriate analogue country, rejected Australia, Brazil and Russia, and proposed Norway as the alternative.
EUSMET je pripomnil, da ZDA niso primerna primerljiva država, zavrnil Avstralijo, Brazilijo in Rusijo ter kot drugo možnost predlagal Norveško.
Norway had been used as analogue country in earlier investigations, but was rejected as an appropriate analogue country in the previous review investigations, for the reasons set out in recital 35 of Regulation (EU) No 467/2010.
Norveška je bila uporabljena kot primerljiva država v prejšnjih preiskavah, vendar je bila zavrnjena kot primerna primerljiva država v prejšnjih preiskavah v zvezi s pregledom zaradi razlogov iz uvodne izjave 35 Uredbe (EU) št. 467/2010.
At the start of this investigation questionnaires were sent to both Norwegian producers, but only one cooperated, and this producer had no domestic sales.
Na začetku te preiskave sta bila vprašalnika poslana obema norveškima proizvajalcema, vendar je sodeloval samo eden in ta ni imel domače prodaje.
The Commission therefore does not consider Norway as an appropriate analogue country.
EUSMET je Komisiji predlagal, naj zavrne ZDA iz naslednjih razlogov:
Brazil had been used as analogue country in the previous investigations but no Brazilian company responded to the questionnaire sent to them, including the companies that had cooperated in the previous investigations.
v ZDA je samo en proizvajalec, ki prodaja na domači trg,
Eusmet asked the Commission to reject the USA for the following reasons:
na uvoz iz nekaterih držav, zlasti LRK in Rusije, ni dajatev,
there is only one producer in the USA who sells onto the domestic market,
domače cene v ZDA štejejo za umetno visoke in nereprezentativne.
there are duties in place against imports from some countries, in particular the PRC and Russia,
Euroalliages se je odzval na pripombe EUSMET v zvezi z ZDA kot primerljivo državo, kot sledi:
they consider domestic prices in the USA to be artificially high and unrepresentative.
ZDA je pomemben uvoznik silicija z rastočim povpraševanjem in upadajočo proizvodnjo,
Euroalliages responded to the comments of Eusmet concerning the USA as analogue country as follows:
obstaja veliko virov uvoza silicija, ki so prosti dajatev ali se zanje zaračunavajo samo carine,
the USA is a substantial importer of silicon with increasing demand and decreasing production,
v zadnjih 40 letih ni bilo naložb v proizvodne obrate v ZDA in če bi bile cene višje od tržne vrednosti, bi se pojavila nova proizvodnja silicijeve kovine, fero-silicijeve peči pa bi bile spremenjene v silicijeve peči.
there are many sources of silicon imports that are either duty-free or subject only to customs duties,
EUSMET je nato poslal dodaten dokument o stališču v zvezi z ZDA kot primerljivo državo, v katerem je navedel, da podatkov proizvajalca iz ZDA ne šteje za objektivne ali točne in da bi lahko neupravičeno vplivali na rezultat preiskave.
there has been no investment in new production sites in the USA for the last 40 years, and if prices were higher than market value new production of silicon metal would have emerged, and conversion of ferro-silicon furnaces into silicon furnaces.
Navedel je, da se je en ruski proizvajalec odzval na vprašalnik, in zato predlagali Rusijo kot primerljivo državo.
Eusmet then sent a further submission regarding the USA as analogue country, stating that they considered the data from the US producer as neither objective nor accurate and in a position to unduly influence the outcome of the investigation.
Te trditve so neutemeljene.
They noted that one Russian producer had replied to the questionnaire and proposed Russia therefore as analogue country.
Podatki proizvajalca iz ZDA so bili preverjeni in ugotovljeno je bilo, da proizvajalec iz ZDA na domačem trgu prodaja po tržnih cenah, dogovorjenih s strankami.
These allegations are unfounded.
EUSMET ni predložil nobenega dokaza, da je na ceno na domačem trgu v ZDA v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom vplivala združitev družbe Globe Specialty Metals z družbo FerroAtlantica.
The data from the US producer was verified and found to be correct and that the domestic sales of the US producer were market prices negotiated with their customers.
EUSMET je tudi navedel, da bi uporaba primerljivih podatkov iz ZDA omogočila družbi FerroAtlantica in Euroalliages, da izračunata izvozne cene kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Eusmet provided no evidence that the domestic market price in the US during the review investigation period was affected by the merger of Globe Specialty Metals with FerroAtlantica.
Tudi ta trditev je neutemeljena.
Eusmet also stated that the use of US analogue data would allow FerroAtlantica and Euroalliages to calculate back the export prices of the Chinese exporting producers.
Zaradi zaupnosti kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in proizvajalca iz ZDA tako podrobnih podatkov ni mogoče posredovati ne družbi FerroAtlantica ne Euroalliages.
This allegation is also unfounded.
EUSMET ni predložil nobenega dokaza za podporo svojemu predlogu, da bi morala Komisija uporabiti Rusijo kot primerljivo državo.
No disclosure of data at this level of detail can be made to either FerroAtlantica or to Euroalliages due to reasons of confidentiality of both the Chinese exporting producers and the US producer.
V prejšnjem dokumentu o stališču je EUSMET zavrnil Rusijo kot primerljivo državo zaradi prevladujočega položaja edinega proizvajalca na ruskem domačem trgu, izkrivljanj stroškov energije in proizvodnje za lastno uporabo.
Eusmet provided no evidence to support their suggestion that the Commission should use Russia as analogue country.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložil EUSMET, in podatkov, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči ruski proizvajalec, Komisija meni, da je Rusija manj primerna primerljiva država kot ZDA zaradi prevladujočega položaja edinega ruskega proizvajalca, omejenega uvoza (40 % skupne prodaje), izkrivljanj stroškov energije in zato, ker je proizvodnja v Rusiji večinoma namenjena lastni uporabi in ne odprtemu trgu.
In a previous submission Eusmet rejected Russia as an analogue country due to the dominant position of a sole producer on the Russian domestic market; energy cost distortions; and production for captive use.
Čeprav tudi v ZDA samo en proizvajalec prodaja na domači trg, obstaja uvoz iz veliko virov (vključno s Kanado, Južno Afriko, Avstralijo in Norveško), in sicer z uvoznimi dajatvami in brez njih.
Based on the information supplied by Eusmet, and the data submitted by the cooperating Russian producer, the Commission considers Russia to be a less appropriate analogue country than the USA, due to the dominant position of the sole Russian producer, limited imports (40 % of total sales), energy cost distortions, and that production in Russia is mainly for captive consumption rather than for the open market.
Proizvajalec iz ZDA je ocenil, da uvoz zajema skoraj 60 % celotnega trga ZDA.
Although the USA also has only one producer selling onto the domestic market, there are imports from many sources (including Canada, South Africa, Australia and Norway), both with and without import duties.
Zato je domači trg odprt za konkurenco in se cene lahko štejejo za reprezentativne.
The US producer estimated that imports covered almost 60 % of total US market.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da so ZDA najprimernejša primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore the domestic market is open to competition and prices can be considered representative.
Informacije, prejete od sodelujočega proizvajalca v primerljivi državi, so se v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe uporabile kot podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike.
The Commission therefore concluded that the USA was the most appropriate analogue country under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozna cena
The information received from the cooperating producer in the analogue country was used as a basis for the determination of the normal value for the exporting producers, pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je izvozno ceno določila na podlagi cen, ki so jih dejansko plačevale ali jih plačujejo neodvisne stranke za prodajo zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
Export price
Za tri vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike je bila ta prodaja za izvoz v Unijo namenjena družbi neodvisne stranke v Uniji, ki je povezana s Kitajsko.
The Commission established the export price on the basis of prices actually paid or payable by independent customers for sales of the product concerned to the Union.
Primerjava
For three of the sampled exporting producers these sales for export to the Union were made to a Chinese related company of the independent customer in the Union.
Kadar je Komisija to lahko upravičila s potrebo, da se zagotovi poštena primerjava, je v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno prilagodila za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
Comparison
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za posredne davke, stroške prevoza, zavarovanja, manipulativne stroške, stroške natovarjanja in tozadevne stroške ter stroške pakiranja.
Where justified by the need to ensure a fair comparison, the Commission adjusted the normal value and/or the export price for differences affecting prices and price comparability, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja dampinga
Adjustments were made for indirect taxes, transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, and packing.
Za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika je Komisija primerjala tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost vsake vrste podobnega izdelka iz primerljive države s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe.
Dumping margin
Na podlagi tega je Komisija ugotovila povprečne stopnje dampinga za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, v razponu od 20 % do 30 %.
For each cooperating exporting producer, the Commission compared the weighted average normal value of each type of the like product in the analogue country with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Razvoj uvoza v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov
On this basis the Commission found dumping margins for each cooperating exporting producer, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price duty unpaid, in a range from 20 % to 30 %.
Gibanje cen
Development of imports should measures be repealed
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je bilo ob primerjavi izvoznih cen vzorčenih sodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov z normalno vrednostjo primerljive države ugotovljeno, da ti proizvajalci izvozniki izvajajo damping.
Development of prices
Vendar so vsi vzorčeni sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek prodajali uporabnikom v Uniji, ki so silicij nato predelovali v druge izdelke in te izdelke izvažali strankam zunaj Unije.
As set out above, the sampled Chinese cooperating exporting producers were found to be dumping when comparing their export prices to the analogue country normal value.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da uporabniki v Uniji uporabljajo postopek aktivnega oplemenitenja, v skladu s katerim se ob izvozu končnega izdelka ne pobirajo dajatve za uvoz surovin.
However all of the sampled Chinese cooperating exporting producers were selling the product concerned to users in the Union, who were then processing the silicon into other products and exporting these products to customers outside the Union.
Ugotovljene izvozne cene so bile zato dogovorjene med zadevnimi kitajskimi proizvajalci izvozniki in uporabniki v Uniji, ob upoštevanju, da se veljavna protidampinška dajatev ne bo zaračunavala na ta uvoz.
The users in the Union were found to be using the inward processing procedure (‘IPP’) whereby duties are not collected on the import of raw materials when the finished product is exported.
Komisija torej lahko šteje, da so v odsotnosti veljavne protidampinške dajatve izvozne cene, preverjene v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, dober kazalnik cene uvoza silicija iz LRK.
The export prices found were therefore negotiated between the Chinese exporting producers concerned and the Union users, in the knowledge that the anti-dumping duty in force would not be levied on these imports.
Obstajajo torej jasni dokazi, da se bo v odsotnosti ukrepov uvoz izvajal ob tako nizkih cenah.
The Commission can therefore consider that the export prices verified during the review investigation period are a good indicator of the price of imports of silicon from the PRC in the absence of the anti-dumping duty in force.
Proizvodna zmogljivost in potrošnja v LRK
There is therefore clear evidence that in the absence of measures imports will enter at such low prices.
V zahtevku za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa je Euroalliages navedel poročilo CRU [6], v katerem je ocenjeno, da je bila leta 2014 skupna količina silicija v LRK 5,3 milijona ton.
Production capacity and consumption in the PRC
To je primerljivo z ocenami v zahtevku za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa, prav tako s strani CRU, da je LRK leta 2014 proizvedla 1,4 milijona tone, od katerih je bila polovica namenjena domači potrošnji, polovica pa izvozu.
In the expiry review request, Euroalliages quoted a report from CRU [6] estimating the total silicon capacity in the PRC in 2014 to be 5,3 million tonnes.
Poročilo CRU, navedeno v zahtevku, pravi, da je imela Kitajska leta 2014 neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti 3,9 milijona tone, kar je veliko več od skupne potrošnje Unije in več od skupne potrošnje Kitajske.