natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This contravenes point 49 of IPOA IUU which provides that flag States should ensure that all of their vessels involved in transhipments have a prior authorisation issued by the flag State, and report to the national authorities.
Komori zaradi pomanjkanja podatkov ne morejo ustrezno spremljati sledljivosti ribiških proizvodov, zmanjšana pa je tudi njihova zmožnost, da preprečijo trgovanje s proizvodi iz nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
Under Article 31(4)(b) of the IUU Regulation, the Commission also examined the measures taken by the Comoros in respect of access of fisheries products stemming from IUU fishing to its market.
Zaradi ugotovljene nezadostne sledljivosti in pomanjkanja podatkov, ki so na voljo komorskim organom o ribah, iztovorjenih ali pretovorjenih s plovili pod njihovo zastavo, Komori niso preprečili iztovarjanja ribiških proizvodov, pridobljenih z nezakonitim, neprijavljenim in nereguliranim ribolovom, v svojih pristaniščih, s poznejšim tveganjem, da se navedenim proizvodom dovoli dostop na trg.
The IPOA IUU provides guidance on internationally agreed market-related measures which support reduction or elimination of trade in fish and fish products derived from IUU fishing.
Komisija zato ne more zagotoviti, da trgovanje z ribiškimi proizvodi v tej državi ne izvira iz nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
It also suggests at point 71 that States should take steps to improve the transparency of their markets in order to allow the traceability of fish or fish products.
Komori tudi niso upoštevali priporočil iz točke 24 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, v skladu s katerimi naj bi države zastave zagotovile celovito ter učinkovito spremljanje, nadzor in obvladovanje ribolova od njegovega začetka, prek iztovarjanja do končnega namembnega kraja.
Equally, the FAO Code of Conduct outlines, in particular in its Article 11, good practices for post-harvest activities and responsible international trade.
Komisija ob upoštevanju uvodnih izjav od 20 do 35 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 in razvoja dogodkov po tem datumu ter na podlagi člena 31(3) ter člena 31(4)(a) in (b) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu meni, da Komori niso izpolnili dolžnosti, ki so jim naložene z mednarodnim pravom kot državi zastave, pristanišča, obalni državi in državi trga ter zadevajo nezakonita, neprijavljena in neregulirana plovila ter nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov, ki ga opravljajo ali omogočajo ribiška plovila pod njeno zastavo ali njeni državljani, ter da niso sprejeli zadostnih ukrepov za preprečevanje dostopa ribiških proizvodov, ki izvirajo iz nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, na svoj trg.
Article 11.1.11 of that Code of Conduct requests States to ensure that fish and fishery products are traded internationally and domestically in accordance with sound conservation and management practices through improving the identification of the origin of fish and fishery products.
Nesodelovanje in neizvrševanje (člen 31(5) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu)
As established in recital 23 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, the Comoros is not in a position to provide information on the species caught by the Comorian fishing fleet and the trade flows of the products caught.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od 37 do 41 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015, je Komisija analizirala, ali so Komori učinkovito sodelovali s Komisijo pri preiskavah in povezanih dejavnostih.
The Commission considered on the basis of the information gathered from the Comorian authorities that no progress has been made as regards the facts described in recitals 23 and 33 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, concerning the lack of control by the Comorian authorities on the Comorian vessels operating outside the Comorian EEZ regarding their fishing activities, landings and transhipments.
Po sprejetju Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 je Komisija naletela na težave pri vzpostavljanju sodelovanja s komorskimi organi.
The Comoros was therefore not in a position to guarantee the transparency of its markets to allow the traceability of fish or fish products as established in point 71 of the IPOA IUU.
Zanesljivost njihovih odgovorov je bila ogrožena tudi s pošiljanjem delnih odgovorov, ki vsebujejo nasprotujoče si informacije in dokazujejo tudi nizko stopnjo odzivnosti.
That lack of data by the Comoros does not allow it to properly follow the traceability of fish products and undermines its capability to prevent IUU fishing products being traded.
Komisija do sprejetja tega sklepa in kljub naknadni zahtevi po podatkih, ki jo je poslala komorskim organom 2. septembra 2016, teh dokumentov ni prejela.
Given the established lack of traceability and lack of information available to the Comorian authorities on the fish landed or transhipped by its flagged vessels, the Comoros failed to prevent fishery products stemming from IUU fishing from being landed in its ports, with the consequent risk that those products be granted access to the market.
Poleg tega se dokumenti, predloženi Komisiji v zvezi z akcijskim načrtom po datumu Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015, niso odrazili v nobenih konkretnih ukrepih.
The Commission therefore cannot ensure that trade of fishery products conducted in this country do not stem from IUU fishing.
Komisija je na podlagi stanja, opisanega v uvodnih izjavah 33, 34 in 50, ugotovila tudi, da ni prejela ključnih informacij.
In that regard, the Comoros failed to take into consideration the recommendations in point 24 of the IPOA IUU which advises flag States to ensure comprehensive and effective monitoring, control and surveillance of fishing from its commencement, through the point of landing to final destination.
Poleg tega je Komisija je v okviru celovite presoje, ali Komori izpolnjujejo dolžnosti, s čimer spoštujejo svoje obveznosti kot država zastave, pristanišča, obalna država in država trga, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 42 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015, preučila tudi, ali Komori sodelujejo z drugimi državami pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu.
Since the Decision of 1 October 2015, the Comoros has not introduced any appropriate corrective measure to rectify the situation described above.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od 39 do 41, je Komisija ugotovila, da ribiška plovila in plovila, povezana z ribištvom, pod komorsko zastavo opravljajo dejavnost zunaj komorske izključne ekonomske cone (IEC) in zunaj območja pristojnosti Komisije za tune v Indijskem oceanu (IOTC), zlasti v vzhodnem Atlantiku.
The Comoros therefore is not in a position to guarantee the transparency of its markets in a way to allow the traceability of fish or fish products as required in Point 71 of the IPOA IUU and Article 11.1.11 of the FAO Code of Conduct.
Komisija priznava poskuse Komorov za vzpostavitev poti sodelovanja z državami ob vzhodnem Atlantiku prek regionalnih organov za ribištvo, pristojnih za območja, na katerih opravljajo dejavnost komorska plovila.
In view of recitals 20 to 35 of the Decision of 1 October 2015 and the developments after 1 October 2015, the Commission considers, pursuant to Article 31(3) and Article 31(4)(a) and (b) of the IUU Regulation, that the Comoros has failed to discharge their duties under international law as a flag, port, coastal and market State in respect of IUU vessels and IUU fishing carried out or supported by vessels flying its flag or by its nationals and has not taken sufficient action to prevent access of fisheries products stemming from IUU fishing to its market.
Komori so pojasnili, da so predložili pobude za navezovanje neposrednih stikov s tretjimi državami, v katerih opravljajo dejavnost komorska plovila, in Komisija je ponudila rešitve za lažje navezovanje takšnih stikov.
Failure to cooperate and to enforce (Article 31(5) of the IUU Regulation)
Vendar Komisija še ni prejela nobenih informacij o morebitnih izmenjavah podatkov.
As described in recitals 37 to 41 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, the Commission analysed whether the Comoros cooperated effectively with the Commission on investigations and associated activities.
Opozoriti je treba, da je v uvodni izjavi 34 pojasnjeno, da so pristojni organi držav članic komorskim organom poslali zahteve za medsebojno pomoč v zvezi s statusom in dejavnostmi komorskih ribiških plovil in plovil, povezanih z ribištvom.
The reliability of their replies was also compromised by the transmission of partial replies containing contradictory information and also demonstrating a low level of responsiveness.
Vendar je Komisija ugotovila, da neustrezna stopnja sodelovanja komorskih organov pri izmenjavi podatkov s Komisijo vpliva tudi na te zahteve za medsebojno pomoč.
In addition, the Commission took the opportunity of its visit to the Comoros in August 2016 to invite the Comorian authorities to provide a number of documents.
Te razmere so ogrozile ukrepe, ki so jih pristojni organi zadevnih držav na podlagi informacij komorskih organov uvedli proti več komorskim plovilom.
Up till this Decision and despite a follow-up request for information sent to the Comorian authorities on 2 September 2016, the Commission did not receive these documents.
Stanje, ki je opisano v uvodnih izjavah od 54 do 56, kaže, da Komori niso učinkovito sodelovali in usklajevali dejavnosti z državami, v katerih opravljajo dejavnost komorska plovila, pri preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, odvračanju od njega ter njegovem odpravljanju v skladu s točko 28 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
Furthermore, the documents submitted to the Commission in relation to the action plan following the Decision of 1 October 2015 did not translate into any concrete action.
Komori bi kot država zastave morali v skladu s točko 31 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova z drugimi državami zlasti skleniti dogovore ali sporazume in tudi drugače sodelovati pri izvrševanju veljavnih zakonov ter ukrepov ali določb za ohranjanje in upravljanje na nacionalni, regionalni ali mednarodni ravni.
In light of the situation described in recitals 33, 34 and 50, the Commission also established that crucial information had not been shared with the Commission.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 44 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015, je Komisija analizirala tudi, ali so Komori sprejeli učinkovite izvršilne ukrepe v zvezi z izvajalci dejavnosti, odgovornimi za nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov, in ali se uporabljajo dovolj stroge sankcije, da ostanejo kršitelji brez koristi, ki izhajajo iz nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
This failure to cooperate is aggravated by the lack of internal coordination within the Comorian administration, between the authority in charge of registration of vessels and that in charge of fisheries, which has been acknowledged by the Comorian authorities during the visit of the Commission in August 2016.
Razpoložljivi dokazi potrjujejo, da Komori niso izpolnili svojih obveznosti glede učinkovitih izvršilnih ukrepov v skladu z mednarodnim pravom.
In that respect, the Commission established that little or no progress has been achieved on this critical weakness since the Decision of 1 October 2015 and that crucial information had not been shared within the Comorian administration.
Ugotovljeno je tudi, da so komorski organi v času izmenjav, ki so potekale v okviru zahtev za pomoč in so se nanašale na do 12 komorskih plovil, dejavnih pri pretovarjanju na morju in skupnih operacijah, Komisiji in državam članicam predložili pisne izjave, ki potrjujejo, da so komorski organi prepovedali pretovarjanja na morju in da zato ta plovila opravljajo nezakonite, neprijavljene in neregulirane ribolovne dejavnosti.
In addition, in the context of the overall assessment of the fulfilment of the Comoros' duties to discharge its obligations as a flag port, coastal and market State, the Commission, as stated in recital 42 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, also analysed whether the Comoros cooperates with other States in the fight against IUU fishing.
Vendar je Komisija ugotovila, da po sprejetju Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 komorski organi niso poročali o sprejetju izvršilnih ukrepov proti plovilom, ki brez dovoljenja komorskih organov opravljajo dejavnost zunaj komorske izključne ekonomske cone (IEC) in tudi zunaj območja pristojnosti Komisije za tune v Indijskem oceanu (IOTC).
As highlighted in recitals 39 to 41, the Commission established that Comorian flagged fishing and fishing-related vessels are operating outside the Comorian EEZ and the area of competence of the IOTC, in particular in the eastern Atlantic.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 32, je ugotovljeno tudi, da je bilo šestmesečno obdobje odloga, ki se je začelo avgusta 2016 in je bilo dejansko odobreno ribiškim plovilom in plovilom, povezanim z ribištvom, ki plujejo pod komorsko zastavo, v nasprotju s komorsko zakonodajo in zahtevami.
The Commission acknowledges the attempts of the Comoros to establish channels of cooperation with eastern Atlantic countries through regional fishery bodies which cover areas where Comorian vessels are operating.
Ta odločitev je skupaj s stanjem, opisanim v uvodni izjavi 56, ogrozila ukrepe, ki so jih pristojni organi držav članic na podlagi informacij komorskih organov uvedli proti več komorskim plovilom.
The Comoros explained that initiatives have been taken to enter into direct contact with third countries where Comorian vessels are operating and the Commission has offered solutions to facilitate such contacts.
Komorski organi so Komisijo obvestili o morebitnem preklicu registracije za plovila, ki ne bi legalizirala svojega statusa do konca šestmesečnega obdobja odloga.
The Commission has however not yet been provided with any information on possible exchanges.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da preklic registracije plovil ne zagotavlja dovolj strogih sankcij za kršitelje in jim ne odvzema koristi, ki izhajajo iz njihovih nezakonitih dejavnosti.
It is recalled that recital 34 explains that requests for mutual assistance have been sent from the competent authorities of Member States to the Comorian authorities regarding the status and activities of Comorian fishing and fishing-related vessels.
Komisija je med obiskom avgusta 2016 ugotovila tudi, da organi niso sprejeli nobene konkretne odločitve o preklicu registracije.
The Commission has also been informed that third countries also took similar initiatives.
Takšen teoretični preklic registracije v nobenem primeru ne bi vključeval preiskave nezakonitih, neprijavljenih in nereguliranih ribolovnih dejavnosti, ki jih opravljajo plovila, ali naložitve sankcij zaradi ugotovljenih kršitev.
The Commission however found that the inadequate level of cooperation forthcoming from the Comorian authorities in its exchanges with the Commission also affected these requests for mutual assistance.
Na podlagi podatkov, zbranih med obiskom avgusta 2016, je Komisija ugotovila, da so komorski organi, pristojni za ribištvo, pripravili kontrolni seznam, v katerem so našteti pogoji za izdajo ribolovnih dovoljenj za pomoč pri legalizaciji v šestmesečnem prehodnem obdobju iz uvodne izjave 62.
This situation compromised the actions initiated by the competent authorities of the countries concerned towards a number of Comorian vessels on the basis of information provided by the Comorian authorities.
Ta dokument je bil poslan komorskim organom, pristojnim za registracijo plovil.
The situation described in recitals 54 to 56 indicates that the Comoros failed to effectively cooperate and coordinate activities with States where Comorian vessels are operating in preventing, deterring and eliminating IUU fishing in line with point 28 of the IPOA IUU.
Cilj je bil, da se dokument pošlje zasebnim pravnim osebam s sedežem zunaj Komorov, na katere je bilo delno preneseno upravljanje komorskega registra ribiške flote in flote, povezane z ribištvom.
In particular, as established in point 31 of the IPOA IUU, the Comoros as flag State should enter into agreements or arrangements with other States and otherwise cooperate for the enforcement of applicable laws and conservation and management measures or provisions adopted at a national, regional or international level.
Zasebne pravne osebe so bile zadolžene za prenos navedenega dokumenta gospodarskim subjektom.
As highlighted in recital 44 of the Decision of 1 October 2015, the Commission also analysed whether the Comoros had taken effective enforcement measures in respect of operators responsible for IUU fishing and whether sanctions of sufficient severity to deprive the offenders of the benefits accruing from IUU fishing had been applied.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je ta dokument zelo teoretične narave in ne odraža potrebnih tehničnih elementov, ki bi gospodarskim subjektom omogočili uskladitev s komorsko zakonodajo, komorskim organom pa spremljanje dejavnosti zadevnih komorskih plovil.
Available evidence confirms that the Comoros has not fulfilled its obligations under international law with respect to effective enforcement measures.
Na podlagi stanja iz uvodnih izjav od 62 do 64 je Komisija ugotovila, da komorski organi niso sprejeli nobenih ustreznih previdnostnih ukrepov v zvezi z ribiškimi plovili in plovili, povezanimi z ribištvom, ki plujejo pod komorsko zastavo ter opravljajo dejavnost v nasprotju s komorsko zakonodajo in zahtevami.
It is also noted that in the course of exchanges that took place in the context of requests for assistance that concerned up to 12 Comorian vessels active in at-sea transhipments and joint operations, the Comorian authorities provided the Commission and Member States written statements certifying that at-sea transhipments are prohibited by the Comorian authorities, and that consequently, these vessels are conducting IUU fishing activities.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da so komorski organi, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 46 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015, že pred tem sklepom vedeli, da so plovila, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo, v nasprotju s komorsko zakonodajo in zahtevami opravljala dejavnost zunaj komorske izključne ekonomske cone (IEC), vendar niso sprejeli izvršilnih ukrepov v zvezi z navedenimi plovili.
The Commission however established that, after the Decision of 1 October 2015 the Comorian authorities did not report taking any enforcement measures against the vessels operating outside the Comorian EEZ, without an authorisation from the Comorian authorities, as well as outside the area of competence of the IOTC.
Stanje iz uvodnih izjav od 58 do 66 je v nasprotju s členom 94 konvencije UNCLOS, ki določa obveznosti države zastave, da učinkovito izvaja nacionalno pristojnost in nadzor plovil, ki plujejo pod njeno zastavo, njihovih poveljnikov, častnikov in posadk.
Moreover, as described in recital 32, it is noted that a 6-month grace period starting from August 2016 had been effectively granted to fishing and fishing-related vessels flying the Comorian flag operating in breach of Comorian law and requirements.
To stanje je tudi v nasprotju s priporočili za sprejemanje izvršilnih ukrepov v zvezi z nezakonitimi, neprijavljenimi in nereguliranimi ribolovnimi dejavnostmi in za dovolj strogo sankcioniranje takih dejavnosti, da se učinkovito prepreči nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov, se odvrača od njega in se ga odpravlja ter da kršitelji ostanejo brez koristi, ki izhajajo iz takega ribolova, kot je določeno v členu 8.2.7 Kodeksa ravnanja FAO, točki 21 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter točkah 31 do 33, 35 in 38 prostovoljnih smernic FAO o uspešnosti države zastave.
This decision, along with the situation described in recital 56, has compromised the actions initiated by the competent authorities of Member States towards a number of Comorian vessels on the basis of information provided by the Comorian authorities.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da je v uvodni izjavi 50 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 ugotovljeno, da kazni, ki so v sistemu sankcij predvidene v okviru industrijskih ribiških dejavnosti, temeljijo na vrednosti dajatev za izdajo dovoljenj.
The Commission has been informed by the Comorian authorities about the possible deregistration of vessels which would not regularise their situation by the end of the 6-month grace period.
Vendar so kategorije dovoljenj za gospodarski ribolov v komorskem pravu omejene samo na tuna.
It is however noted that deregistration of vessels does not ensure that offenders of infringement are adequately sanctioned in severity and deprived of the benefits accruing from their illegal activities.
Zato v primeru kršitev industrijske flote, ki lovi druge vrste, ni ustreznih kazni, saj ni ustreznih dajatev za izdajo dovoljenj.
Moreover, the Commission also found, during its visit in August 2016, that no concrete decision on deregistration was adopted by the authorities.
To stanje zmanjšuje stopnjo odvračanja komorskega sistema sankcioniranja in komorskim organom ne omogoča dovolj strogih sankcij za nezakonite, neprijavljene in neregulirane ribolovne dejavnosti, da bi se zagotovilo učinkovito preprečevanje teh dejavnosti, odvračanje od njih in njihovo odpravljanje ter kršiteljem odvzele ugodnosti, ki izhajajo iz njihovih nezakonitih dejavnosti.
In any case, such theoretical deregistration would not entail the conduct of investigations of IUU fishing activities carried out by vessels or the imposition of sanctions for established infringements.
Komisija je ugotovila tudi, da je del komorske uprave menil, da je postopek revizije priložnost za podkrepitev politike zastave ugodnosti (flag of convenience) Komorov.
On the basis of the information gathered during its visit in August 2016, the Commission found that the Comorian authorities in charge of fisheries had elaborated a check list enumerating the conditions for the granting of fishing authorisations in support of the regularisation during the 6-month grace period referred to under recital 62 This document has been transmitted to the Comorian authorities in charge of registration of vessels.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je pravni okvir z vidika skladnosti z veljavnimi mednarodnimi in regionalnimi pravili še vedno neustrezen.
These private legal persons were entrusted to transmit the said document to economic operators.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 47 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015, to stanje kaže na nezmožnost pristojnih organov, da spremljajo dejavnosti komorskih plovil, in zmanjšuje zmožnost pristojnih organov, da učinkovito izvršujejo pravila, ki veljajo na različnih zadevnih področjih.
The Commission established that this document is of a very theoretical nature and does not reflect the necessary technical elements allowing for the economic operators to comply with the Comorian law and the Comorian authorities to monitor the activities of the Comorian vessels concerned.
Poleg tega ni bil dosežen nikakršen napredek glede dejstev, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 51 Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 v zvezi z odsotnostjo nacionalnega inšpekcijskega načrta za zagotavljanje skladne politike nadzora dejavnosti komorske flote in nezadostnim številom opazovalcev.
In light of the situation referred to in recitals 62 to 64 the Commission established that the Comorian authorities have not taken any appropriate precautionary measures in relation to the fishing and fishing-related vessels flying the Comorian flag operating in breach of the Comorian law and requirements.
Komisija je med obiskom avgusta 2016 ugotovila, da kljub temu, da komorski organi priznavajo, da jim primanjkuje zmogljivosti za spremljanje in nadzor ribolova in z ribolovom povezanih dejavnosti komorske flote ne glede na to, kje opravlja dejavnost, in tuje flote, ki opravlja dejavnost v komorski izključni ekonomski cone (IEC), še vedno obstaja namera glede nadaljevanja širitve strategije flote.