natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OJ L 315, 1.12.2010, p. 1.
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 907/2011 z dne 6. septembra 2011 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1105/2010 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ter zaključku postopka v zvezi z uvozom preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra s poreklom iz Republike Koreje in s Tajvana (UL L 232, 9.9.2011, p.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1357
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1357
making imports of certain heavy plate of non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in the People's Republic of China subject to registration
o obvezni registraciji uvoza nekaterih debelih pločevin iz nelegiranega jekla ali drugih legiranih jekel s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 14(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 14(5) Uredbe,
On 13 February 2016, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated by a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] an anti-dumping investigation into imports into the Union of flat products of non-alloy or alloy steel (excluding stainless steel, silicon-electrical steel, tool steel and high-speed steel), hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated, not in coils, of a thickness exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 600 mm or more or of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more but not exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 2050 mm or more (‘heavy plate’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’).
Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 13. februarja 2016 z obvestilom o začetku v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] začela protidampinško preiskavo glede uvoza ploščatih izdelkov iz nelegiranega ali legiranega jekla (razen nerjavnega jekla, silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine, orodnega jekla in hitroreznega jekla), vroče valjanih, neplatiranih, neprevlečenih in neprekritih, ne v kolobarjih, debeline več kot 10 mm in širine 600 mm ali več ali debeline 4,75 mm ali več, vendar ne več kot 10 mm, in širine 2050 mm ali več (v nadaljnjem besedilu: debele pločevine) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK) v Unijo.
The product subject to registration (‘product concerned’) is flat products of non-alloy or alloy steel (excluding stainless steel, silicon-electrical steel, tool steel and high-speed steel), hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated, not in coils, of a thickness exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 600 mm or more or of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more but not exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 2050 mm or more currently falling within CN codes ex72085120, ex72085191, ex72085198, ex72085291, ex72089020, ex72089080, 72254040, ex72254060 and ex72259900 (‘heavy plate’) and originating in the PRC.
Izdelek, za katerega velja obvezna registracija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek), so ploščati izdelki iz nelegiranega ali legiranega jekla (razen nerjavnega jekla, silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine, orodnega jekla in hitroreznega jekla), vroče valjani, neplatirani, neprevlečeni in neprekriti, ne v kolobarjih, debeline več kot 10 mm in širine 600 mm ali več ali debeline 4,75 mm ali več, vendar ne več kot 10 mm, in širine 2050 mm ali več, s poreklom iz LRK, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex72085120, ex72085191, ex72085198, ex72085291, ex72089020, ex72089080, 72254040, ex72254060 in ex72259900 (debele pločevine).
It was supplemented by additional information on 7 July 2016.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe carinskim organom odredi, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza, da bi se proti navedenemu uvozu lahko uporabili ukrepi.
The complainant requested that imports of the product concerned are made subject to registration so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Obvezna registracija uvoza se lahko uvede na podlagi zahtevka industrije Unije, ki vsebuje zadostne dokaze za upravičen ukrep.
GROUNDS FOR THE REGISTRATION
Pritožnik trdi, da je registracija upravičena, ker se dampinški uvoz zadevnega izdelka nadaljuje, uvozniki pa so bili seznanjeni z dampinškimi praksami, ki so bile dolgotrajne in so povzročale škodo industriji Unije.
According to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission may direct the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports, so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports.
Pritožnik tudi trdi, da uvoz iz LRK povzroča škodo industriji Unije in da je tudi po obdobju preiskave prišlo do znatnega povečanja tega uvoza, kar bi resno ogrozilo popravljalne učinke protidampinške dajatve, če bi se uporabila taka dajatev.
Imports may be made subject to registration following a request from the Union industry, which contains sufficient evidence to justify such action.
Uvozniki so se zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati dampinga ter domnevne ali ugotovljene škode
The complainant claims that registration is justified as the product concerned continues to be dumped and that importers were well aware of dumping practices which stretched over an extended period of time and were causing injury to the Union industry.
Komisija meni, da so se uvozniki zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati dampinških praks proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The complainant further claims that imports from the PRC are causing injury to the Union industry and that there was a substantial increase in the level of these imports, even following the investigation period, which would seriously undermine the remedial effect of the anti-dumping duty, if such a duty is to be applied.
V zvezi s tem je pritožba vsebovala dovolj dokazov prima facie, kar je bilo podrobno navedeno v obvestilu o začetku tega postopka [3].
Importers were or should have been aware of the dumping and injury alleged or found
V skladu z oceno iz nezaupne različice pritožbe stopnje dampinga za uvoz iz LRK znašajo od 28 do 73 %.
The Commission considers that the importers were aware, or should have been aware, of the exporting producers' dumping practices.
Pritožnik je v pritožbi predložil zadostne dokaze, v katerih so opisane dampinške prakse proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK in jih uvozniki prima facie ne bi mogli in ne bi smeli prezreti.
Sufficient prima facie evidence in this regard was contained in the complaint and this was spelled out in the notice of initiation for this proceeding [3].
Pritožnik je v pritožbi zlasti predložil dokaze o primerjavi normalne vrednosti, določene na podlagi informacij o oblikovanju cen v končnem poročilu USITC (za obdobje od julija 2014 do junija 2015), z izvozno ceno, ki temelji na četrtletni povprečni vrednosti enote uvoza debelih pločevin iz LRK za ustrezne oznake KN, kot izhaja iz podatkov Eurostata.
The non-confidential version of the complaint estimated dumping margins of 28 % to 73 % for imports from the PRC.
Poleg tega je pritožnik v pritožbo vključil dokaze prima facie o trendu zniževanja uvoznih cen za LRK.
The complainant provided in the complaint sufficient evidence in which the dumping practices by exporting producers from the PRC are described and which prima facie could and should not have been ignored by importers.
Pritožba vsebuje tudi zadostne dokaze prima facie o obstoju škode.
Furthermore, the complainant also included prima facie evidence in the complaint on the decreasing trend of the import prices for the PRC.
Nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza
The average sales price of imports from the PRC to the Union decreased by 25 % between 2012 and the period October 2014-September 2015.
Od začetka postopka februarja 2016 je mogoče pri primerjavi obsega uvoza v obdobju preiskave (2015) s podatki, ki so na voljo za obdobje po začetku preiskave (od marca do maja 2016), za LRK opaziti dodatno povečanje za približno 15 %.
In the request for registration, average import prices from the PRC for the investigation period (2015) were compared with prices for 2012, showing a decrease of around 30 %.
To kaže na znatno nadaljnjo rast uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v prvih treh mesecih po začetku sedanje preiskave.
Finally, in the complaint there is sufficient prima facie evidence that injury is being caused.
Ogrožanje popravljalnega učinka dajatve
Based on all these information contained in the non-confidential version of the complaint, but also given the extent of the dumping that may be occurring and that the information available to the complainants was publicly available, it is reasonable to conclude, based on prima facie evidence available to the Commission, that the importers were aware, or should have been aware, of the dumping and the injury alleged or found.
Navedbe, predložene v okviru preiskave, vključno z zahtevkom za registracijo, vsebujejo dokaze, da bi nadaljnje povečanje tega uvoza ob nadaljnjem zniževanju cen povzročilo dodatno škodo.
Further substantial rise in imports
Kar zadeva cene, je pritožnik v zahtevek za registracijo vključil dokaze prima facie o trendu zniževanja uvoznih cen za LRK.
Since the initiation of the proceeding in February 2016, a further increase of approximately 15 % for the PRC is observed when comparing the import volumes during the investigation period (2015) with data available for the period following the initiation (March to May 2016).
Kar zadeva gibanje cen uvoza po začetku postopka februarja 2016, je bil pri primerjavi cen od marca do maja 2016 s cenami za obdobje preiskave (2015) ugotovljeno nadaljnje znižanje povprečnih cen uvoza iz LRK za približno 30 %.
This shows that there was a further substantial rise in imports from the PRC of the product concerned in the first three months following the initiation of the present investigation.
Nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza, za katero je dovolj dokazov prima facie, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 6, bo verjetno glede na časovni okvir, obseg domnevno dampinškega uvoza in druge okoliščine (kot so presežne zmogljivosti v LRK in oblikovanje cen kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov) resno ogrozila popravljalni učinek kakršne koli dokončne dajatve, razen če bi se taka dajatev uporabila retroaktivno.
Undermining of the remedial effect of the duty
Poleg tega je glede na začetek sedanjega postopka in ob upoštevanju dosedanjega razvoja uvoza iz LRK v smislu cen in obsega upravičeno sklepati, da se bo pred uvedbo morebitnih začasnih ukrepov raven uvoza zadevnega izdelka še povečala, uvozniki pa si bodo hitro ustvarili zaloge.
In the submissions made in the framework of the investigation, including the registration request, there is evidence that additional injury would be caused by a continued rise in these imports at further decreasing prices.
POSTOPEK
As regards prices, the complainant included prima facie evidence in the request for registration on the decreasing trend of the import prices for the PRC.
Komisija je glede na navedeno ugotovila, da je pritožnik predložil zadostne dokaze prima facie, ki upravičujejo obvezno registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe.
As for the evolution of import prices after the initiation of the case in February 2016, a further drop of around 30 % was observed for average import prices from the PRC when comparing prices of March-May 2016 with prices for the investigation period (2015).
Vse zainteresirane strani so pozvane, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in predložijo ustrezne dokaze.
Further substantial rise in imports, for which there is sufficient prima facie evidence as referred to in recital 6, is likely, in light of its timing, the volume of the alleged dumped imports and other circumstances (such as the excess capacity in the PRC and pricing behaviour of Chinese exporting producers) to seriously undermine the remedial effect of any definitive duty, unless such duty would be applied retroactively.
Poleg tega lahko Komisija zasliši zainteresirane strani, če te vložijo pisni zahtevek, v katerem navedejo posebne razloge, zaradi katerih bi morale biti zaslišane.
In addition, in view of the initiation of the current proceeding and taking into account the developments of imports from the PRC in terms of prices and volumes hitherto, it is reasonable to assume that the level of imports of the product concerned may further increase prior to the adoption of provisional measures, if any, and inventories may be rapidly built up by the importers.
REGISTRACIJA
PROCEDURE
V skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba za uvoz zadevnega izdelka uvesti obvezno registracijo, da se, če bodo rezultati preiskave privedli do uvedbe protidampinške dajatve ter bodo izpolnjeni potrebni pogoji, v skladu s členom 10(4) osnovne uredbe navedena dajatev za registrirani uvoz lahko obračuna retroaktivno.
In view of the above, the Commission has concluded that the complainant provided sufficient prima facie evidence to justify making imports of the product concerned subject to registration in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
V svoji pritožbi pritožnik ocenjuje, da znašajo za uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz LRK stopnje dampinga od 28 do 73 %, povprečna stopnja nelojalnega nižanja cen pa 11 %.
All interested parties are invited to make their views known in writing and to provide supporting evidence.
Ocenjeni znesek morebitnih prihodnjih obveznosti LRK je določen vsaj na ravni nelojalnega nižanja cen, ki je ocenjeno na podlagi pritožbe, tj. na 11 % ad valorem uvozne vrednosti CIF zadevnega izdelka.
Furthermore, the Commission may hear interested parties, provided that they make a request in writing and show that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.
OBDELAVA OSEBNIH PODATKOV
REGISTRATION
Vsi osebni podatki, zbrani v okviru te registracije, bodo obdelani v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] –
Pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation imports of the product concerned should be made subject to registration for the purpose of ensuring that, should the investigation result in findings leading to the imposition of an anti-dumping duty, this duty can, if the necessary conditions are fulfilled, be levied retroactively on the registered imports in accordance with Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The complainant estimates in the complaint dumping margins of 28 % to 73 % and an average undercutting margin of 11 % for imports of the product concerned from the PRC.
Člen 1
The estimated amount of possible future liability is set for the PRC at least at the level of undercutting estimated on the basis of the complaint, i.e. 11 % ad valorem on the CIF import value of the product concerned.
Carinskim organom se odredi, naj v skladu s členom 14(5) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza ploščatih izdelkov iz nelegiranega ali legiranega jekla (razen nerjavnega jekla, silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine, orodnega jekla in hitroreznega jekla), vroče valjanih, neplatiranih, neprevlečenih in neprekritih, ne v kolobarjih, debeline več kot 10 mm in širine 600 mm ali več ali debeline 4,75 mm ali več, vendar ne več kot 10 mm, in širine 2050 mm ali več, s poreklom iz LRK, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex72085120, ex72085191, ex72085198, ex72085291, ex72089020, ex72089080, 72254040, ex72254060 in ex72259900 (oznake TARIC: 7208512010, 7208519110, 7208519810, 7208529110, 7208902010, 7208908020, 7225406010, 7225990030), v Unijo.
PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA
Registracija preneha veljati devet mesecev po datumu začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Any personal data collected in the context of this registration will be treated in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4],
Vse zainteresirane strani so pozvane, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča, predložijo ustrezne dokaze ali zahtevajo zaslišanje v 20 dneh od datuma objave te uredbe.
The customs authorities are hereby directed, pursuant to Article 14(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] to take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Union of flat products of non-alloy or alloy steel (excluding stainless steel, silicon-electrical steel, tool steel and high-speed steel), hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated, not in coils, of a thickness exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 600 mm or more or of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more but not exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 2050 mm or more currently falling within CN codes ex72085120, ex72085191, ex72085198, ex72085291, ex72089020, ex72089080, 72254040, ex72254060 and ex72259900 (TARIC codes: 7208512010, 7208519110, 7208519810, 7208529110, 7208902010, 7208908020, 7225406010, 7225990030) and originating in the People's Republic of China.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
Registration shall expire nine months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
V Bruslju, 9. avgusta 2016
All interested parties are invited to make their views known in writing, to provide supporting evidence or to request to be heard within 20 days from the date of publication of this Regulation.
Za Komisijo
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
UL C 58, 13.2.2016, str. 20.
Done at Brussels, 9 August 2016.
UL C 58, 13.2.2016, str. 20 (točka 3 obvestila o začetku).
For the Commission
Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 8, 12.1.2001, str. 1).
The President
Pritožnik je 18. aprila 2016 v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe vložil zahtevek za registracijo.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
Zahtevek je bil 7. julija 2016 dopolnjen z dodatnimi informacijami.
OJ C 58, 13.2.2016, p. 20 (section 3 of the notice of initiation).
Povprečna prodajna cena uvoza iz LRK v Unijo se je med letom 2012 in obdobjem od oktobra 2014 do septembra 2015 znižala za 25 %.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).
V zahtevku za registracijo so se povprečne uvozne cene iz LRK za obdobje preiskave (2015) primerjale s cenami za leto 2012 in ugotovljeno je bilo znižanje za približno 30 %.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1358
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1358
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1364
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1364
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1368
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1368
establishing a list of critical benchmarks used in financial markets pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o določitvi seznama ključnih referenčnih vrednosti, ki se uporabljajo na finančnih trgih v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/1011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investments funds and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2014/17/EU and Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 [1], and in particular Article 20(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o indeksih, ki se uporabljajo kot referenčne vrednosti v finančnih instrumentih in finančnih pogodbah ali za merjenje uspešnosti investicijskih skladov, in spremembi direktiv 2008/48/ES in 2014/17/EU ter Uredbe (EU) št. 596/2014 [1] in zlasti člena 20(1) Uredbe,
Benchmarks play an important role in the determination of the price of many financial instruments and financial contracts and of the measurement of performance for many investment funds.
Referenčne vrednosti imajo pomembno vlogo pri določanju cene številnih finančnih instrumentov in finančnih pogodb ter pri merjenju uspešnosti številnih investicijskih skladov.
The contribution to and administration of benchmarks are in many cases vulnerable to manipulation and persons involved often face conflict of interests.
Prispevanje k referenčnim vrednostim in njihovo upravljanje sta v številnih primerih ranljiva za manipulacijo, osebe, ki se s tem ukvarjajo, pa se pogosto soočajo z navzkrižji interesov.
In order to fulfil their economic role, benchmarks need to be representative of the underlying market or economic reality they reflect.
Da bi izpolnjevale svojo vlogo v gospodarstvu, morajo referenčne vrednosti reprezentativno odražati osnovni trg ali gospodarsko realnost.
Should a benchmark no longer be representative of an underlying market, such as interbank offered rates, there is a risk of negative effects on, inter alia, market integrity, the financing of households (loans and mortgages) and businesses in the Union.
Če referenčna vrednost ni več reprezentativna za osnovni trg, na primer medbančne obrestne mere, obstaja nevarnost negativnih učinkov na, med drugim, celovitost trga ter financiranje gospodinjstev (krediti in hipotekarna posojila) in podjetij v Uniji.
Risks to users, markets and the economy of the Union generally increase where the total value of financial instruments, financial contracts and investment funds referencing a specific benchmark is high.
Tveganja za uporabnike, trge in gospodarstvo Unije se navadno povečajo, kadar je skupna vrednost finančnih instrumentov, finančnih pogodb in investicijskih skladov, ki je zastopana v določeni referenčni vrednosti, visoka.
Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 therefore establishes different categories of benchmarks and provides for additional requirements ensuring the integrity and robustness of certain benchmarks considered as being critical, including the power of competent authorities to mandate, under certain conditions, contributions to or the administration of a critical benchmark.
Zato so v Uredbi (EU) 2016/1011 določene različne kategorije referenčnih vrednosti ter tudi dodatne zahteve za zagotovitev celovitosti in trdnosti nekaterih referenčnih vrednosti, ki se štejejo za ključne, vključno s pooblastilom pristojnih organov, da pod določenimi pogoji zahtevajo prispevke h ključnim referenčnim vrednostim ali njihovo upravljanje.
The additional obligations and powers of competent authorities of administrators of critical benchmarks require a formal process for the determination of critical benchmarks.
Dodatne obveznosti in pooblastila pristojnih organov upravljavcev ključnih referenčnih vrednosti zahtevajo uraden postopek za določitev ključnih referenčnih vrednosti.
In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011, a benchmark is considered as being a critical benchmark where it is used directly or indirectly within a combination of benchmarks as a reference for financial instruments or financial contracts or for measuring the performance of investment funds, having a total value of at least EUR 500 billion on the basis of all the range of maturities or tenors of the benchmark, where applicable.
V skladu s členom 20(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1011 se referenčna vrednost šteje za ključno, kadar se uporablja neposredno ali posredno v kombinaciji referenčnih vrednosti kot referenca pri finančnih instrumentih ali finančnih pogodbah ali za merjenje uspešnosti investicijskih skladov, katerih skupna vrednost je vsaj 500 milijard EUR na podlagi celotnega razpona trajanja oziroma zapadlosti referenčne vrednosti, kadar je to primerno.