natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As concerns the alleged different customers for zinc reclaimed powders, the investigation revealed that three of the interested parties making this claim were in fact consumers of this type of product as well as of tungsten carbide.
Poleg tega drugi elementi, navedeni v uvodni izjavi 36, kot so proizvodni stroški in povpraševanje, kot taki niso pomembni za opredelitev izdelka, ki se pregleduje.
Therefore, the claim was rejected.
Kar zadeva domnevno različne stranke, ki kupujejo prah, pridobljen s predelavo cinka, je preiskava pokazala, da so bile tri zainteresirane strani, ki so to trdile, dejansko stranke, ki kupujejo tovrstni izdelek, pa tudi volframov karbid.
Several interested parties argued that the current investigation should not cover tungsten carbide manufactured from scrap.
Zato je bila trditev zavrnjena.
It was claimed that the product under review imported from the PRC is almost exclusively manufactured from virgin raw materials while the Union industry produced tungsten carbide also from recycled material.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da sedanja preiskava ne bi smela zajemati volframovega karbida, proizvedenega iz ostankov.
These parties argued that the cost of production of tungsten carbide varies depending on the raw material used and that the collection, transport and processing of scrap results in a different cost structure.
Trdilo se je, da se izdelek, ki se pregleduje in uvaža iz LRK, skoraj izključno proizvaja iz primarnih surovin, medtem ko industrija Unije proizvaja volframom karbid tudi iz recikliranega materiala.
The cost of production depending on the input used (virgin raw materials or scrap) is not as such relevant for the product definition, but rather the product's technical, physical and chemical characteristics and basic applications.
Te strani so trdile, da se stroški proizvodnje volframovega karbida razlikujejo glede na uporabljene surovine ter da zbiranje, prevoz in predelava ostankov vodijo do različne strukture stroškov.
Furthermore, as confirmed during the assessment of the production process of the Union industry, there is no separation between tungsten carbide manufactured from virgin raw materials and tungsten carbide manufactured from scrap.
Stroški proizvodnje, ki so odvisni od uporabljenih surovin (primarne surovine ali ostanki), kot taki niso pomembni za opredelitev izdelka, temveč so pomembne tehnične, fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter osnovne uporabe izdelka.
Certain Union producers use only virgin raw materials in their manufacturing process, while others use scrap as well.
Poleg tega se, kot je bilo ugotovljeno med ocenjevanjem proizvodnega postopka industrije Unije, ne razlikuje med volframovim karbidom, proizvedenim iz primarnih surovin, in volframovim karbidom, proizvedenim iz ostankov.
As mentioned in recital (34), the tungsten carbide produced from virgin raw materials and the one produced from scrap have identical physical and chemical characteristics and the same usage.
Nekateri proizvajalci Unije v proizvodnem postopku uporabljajo samo primarne surovine, medtem ko drugi uporabljajo tudi ostanke.
In any event, as stated in recital (21), none of the Chinese exporting producers replied to the questionnaire.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 34, imata volframov karbid, proizveden iz primarnih surovin, in volframov karbid, proizveden iz ostankov, enake fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter enako uporabo.
The Commission was therefore not able to assess their manufacturing process and the product types exported to the Union.
Vsekakor pa, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 21, noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni izpolnil vprašalnika.
Therefore, the claim that the present investigation should not cover tungsten carbide manufactured from scrap was rejected.
Zato Komisija ni mogla oceniti njihovega proizvodnega postopka in vrst izdelka, ki se izvažajo v Unijo.
One user claimed that the investigation should take into account different commercial qualities of tungsten carbide as the different grades of tungsten carbide (such as ultrafine, standard grades and high temperature carburized grades) have an impact on prices and price comparability.
Trditev, da sedanja preiskava ne bi smela zajemati volframovega karbida, proizvedenega iz ostankov, je bila zato zavrnjena.
Furthermore, it was claimed that the Chinese exporting producers are specialised in producing standard grades while the Union industry is producing all grades.
Eden od uporabnikov je trdil, da bi bilo treba pri preiskavi upoštevati različne tržne lastnosti volframovega karbida, saj različne vrste volframovega karbida (kot so volframov karbid z izredno majhnimi delci, standardne vrste volframovega karbida in vrste volframovega karbida, ki se karbonizirajo pri visokih temperaturah) vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen.
This claim was not substantiated and could not be confirmed during the investigation.
Poleg tega se je trdilo, da so kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki specializirani za proizvodnjo standardnih vrst, medtem ko industrija Unije proizvaja vse vrste.
The user in question did not provide any evidence indicating a significant price difference between various product types/qualities.
Ta trditev ni bila utemeljena in je v preiskavi ni bilo mogoče potrditi.
Also, this claim could not be confirmed by the information collected during the investigation.
Zadevni uporabnik ni zagotovil nobenih dokazov o znatni razliki v cenah med različnimi vrstami/lastnostmi.
Furthermore, as stated in recital (21) none of the Chinese exporting producers submitted a reply to the questionnaire.
Prav tako ta trditev ni bila potrjena z informacijami, zbranimi med preiskavo.
The Commission was therefore not able to assess, among other elements, the type of products they manufacture, their cost structure and their sales prices.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 21, noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
Therefore, this claim was rejected.
Zato Komisija poleg drugih elementov ni mogla oceniti niti vrste izdelkov, ki jih proizvajajo, njihove strukture stroškov in njihovih prodajnih cen.
Like product
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
The investigation concluded that the product under review manufactured and sold by the exporting producers to the Union is identical in terms of physical and chemical characteristics and uses to the product produced by the Union producers and sold on the Union market or to the one produced and sold in the analogue country.
Podobni izdelek
The Commission therefore concluded that these products are like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je izdelek, ki se pregleduje ter ga proizvajajo proizvajalci izvozniki in prodajajo v Unijo, v smislu fizikalnih in kemijskih lastnosti ter uporab enak izdelku, ki ga proizvajajo proizvajalci Unije in prodajajo na trg Unije, ali izdelku, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v primerljivi državi.
LIKELIHOOD OF A CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
Komisija je zato sklenila, da sta ta izdelka podobna izdelka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Dumping
VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
Analogue country
Damping
None of the Chinese exporting producers was granted market economy treatment in the original investigation.
Primerljiva država
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for all exporting producers shall be determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country.
Nobenemu od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni bila v prvotni preiskavi odobrena tržnogospodarska obravnava.
For this purpose, a market economy third country had to be selected (‘the analogue country’).
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se normalna vrednost za vse proizvajalce izvoznike določi na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom.
The United States of America (‘USA’) was selected as an analogue country in the previous expiry reviews.
V ta namen je bilo treba izbrati tretjo državo s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“).
In the Notice of Initiation of the present review, the Commission proposed to use again the USA as an analogue country and invited interested parties to comment.
Združene države Amerike („ZDA“) so bile pri prejšnjih pregledih zaradi izteka ukrepa izbrane za primerljivo državo.
The Commission sought cooperation in other potential analogue countries, contacted known producers of tungsten carbide in Japan and Canada and invited them to provide the necessary information.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku sedanjega pregleda predlagala, naj se kot primerljiva država znova uporabijo ZDA, in zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe.
The Commission contacted the authorities of Israel, Japan, the USA, Canada, Republic of Korea, India and the Russian Federation and asked them to provide information regarding production of tungsten carbide in their respective countries.
Prizadevala si je za sodelovanje v drugih možnih primerljivih državah in vzpostavila stik z znanimi proizvajalci volframovega karbida na Japonskem in v Kanadi ter jih pozvala, naj zagotovijo potrebne informacije.
The Commission received information from Canada, Japan and USA on about 20 known producers of the like product in these countries, which were contacted and invited to reply to a questionnaire.
Vzpostavila je stik z organi Izraela, Japonske, ZDA, Kanade, Republike Koreje, Indije in Ruske federacije ter jih pozvala, naj zagotovijo informacije v zvezi s proizvodnjo volframovega karbida v svoji državi.
Only one producer in the USA and one in Japan came forward and provided the information requested.
Od Kanade, Japonske in ZDA je prejela informacije o 20 znanih proizvajalcih podobnega izdelka v teh državah, s katerimi je vzpostavila stik in jih pozvala, naj izpolnijo vprašalnik.
Both markets, in the USA and Japan, were similar in terms of the number of domestic producers, the absence of anti-dumping measures in force and the significant quantities of imports from China.
Javila sta se samo en proizvajalec iz ZDA in en iz Japonske, ki sta predložila zahtevane informacije.
This indicated that both markets were competitive.
Oba trga, tj. trg ZDA in Japonske, sta bila podobna v smislu števila domačih proizvajalcev, neobstoja veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov in velikega obsega uvoza iz Kitajske.
However, while the Japanese producer sold only negligible quantities of the like product on its domestic market, the USA producer sold significant quantities on its domestic market during the RIP.
To je bil dokaz, da sta bila oba trga konkurenčna.
Although several parties noted that the producer in the USA was related to the Union industry, this fact in itself is not an impediment for the selection of the USA as the analogue country.
Medtem ko je japonski proizvajalec v OPP na svojem domačem trgu prodal le zanemarljive količine podobnega izdelka, pa je proizvajalec iz ZDA v tem obdobju na svojem domačem trgu prodal znatne količine.
Indeed, no party submitted evidence that in this case this relationship had an impact on domestic prices in the USA and that, as a consequence, the USA would not be an appropriate analogue country.
Čeprav je več strani ugotovilo, da je bil proizvajalec iz ZDA povezan z industrijo Unije, to dejstvo samo po sebi ne ovira izbire ZDA kot primerljive države.
Several interested parties also claimed that no consideration was given to the production methods used in the USA in particular whether tungsten carbide was produced from virgin raw material or from scrap (as explained in recital (33)).
Dejansko nobena stran ni predložila dokazov, da je v tem primeru to razmerje vplivalo na domače cene v ZDA in da zato ZDA ne bi bile primerna primerljiva država.
These parties claimed that there was an impact of these different production methods on the demand and prices in the USA market, which should be taken into consideration.
Več zainteresiranih strani je tudi trdilo, da se niso upoštevali načini proizvodnje, ki se uporabljajo v ZDA, zlasti to, ali se je volframov karbid proizvajal iz primarnih surovin ali ostankov (kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 33.
Furthermore, they claimed that the prices in the USA were at a particularly high level given that the USA producers had contracts with the USA army at high prices.
Te strani so trdile, da so ti različni načini proizvodnje vplivali na povpraševanje in cene na trgu ZDA, kar bi bilo treba upoštevati.
As already mentioned in recital (34), tungsten carbide manufactured from virgin raw materials and tungsten carbide manufactures from scrap have identical physical and chemical characteristics and the same usage.
Trdile so tudi, da so bile cene v ZDA zelo visoke glede na to, da so imeli proizvajalci iz ZDA sklenjene pogodbe z ameriško vojsko, v katerih so bile določene visoke cene.
Therefore, also in the USA, there was no separation between tungsten carbide manufactured from virgin raw materials and tungsten carbide manufactures from scrap in the manufacturing process.
Kot je bilo že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 34, imata volframov karbid, proizveden iz primarnih surovin, in volframov karbid, proizveden iz ostankov, enake fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter enako uporabo.
In addition, the investigation revealed that the production process had no impact on the demand and the prices.
Zato se tudi v ZDA pri proizvodnem postopku ni razlikovalo med volframovim karbidom, proizvedenim iz primarnih surovin, in volframovim karbidom, proizvedenim iz ostankov.
Furthermore, while tungsten carbide is indeed used for military applications, based on the information collected during the investigation, there was no evidence that any cooperation with the government had an impact on the domestic price of the analogue market producer.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da proizvodni postopek ni vplival na povpraševanje in cene.
Finally, these interested parties did not propose any alternative analogue country.
Čeprav se volframov karbid dejansko uporablja za vojaške namene, na podlagi informacij, zbranih med preiskavo, ni bilo dokazov, da bi kakršno koli sodelovanje z vlado vplivalo na domačo ceno proizvajalca na primerljivem trgu.
The arguments challenging the appropriateness of the USA as an analogue market were therefore rejected.
Te zainteresirane strani niso predlagale nobene alternativne primerljive države.
On the basis of the above, taking into account the quantities sold on the domestic markets of producers in potential analogue countries at the time of the selection, given that the USA was also used as an analogue country in the original investigation and the fact that the Commission did not receive any comments from interested parties which were able to put into question the appropriateness of the USA as the analogue country, the USA was considered to be a suitable analogue country.
Trditve, s katerimi se je izpodbijala primernost ZDA kot primerljivega trga, so bile zato zavrnjene.
Interested parties were informed on this selection.
Na podlagi navedenega so se ZDA ob upoštevanju količin, prodanih na domačih trgih proizvajalcev v možni primerljivi državi v času izbire, glede na to, da so bile ZDA uporabljene kot primerljiva država v prvotni preiskavi, in glede na dejstvo, da Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb od zainteresiranih strani, ki so lahko izpodbijale primernost ZDA kot primerljive države, štele za primerno primerljivo državo.
Normal value
Zainteresirane strani so bile o tej izbiri obveščene.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the total volume of sales of the analogue country producer of the like product in the domestic market was representative during the review investigation period.
Normalna vrednost
These sales were considered representative if the total sales volume to independent customers represented at least 5 % of the total Chinese export sales volume of the product under review to the Union as established in recital (111) below during the review investigation period.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali je bil celotni obseg prodaje proizvajalca podobnega izdelka iz primerljive države na domačem trgu v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom reprezentativen.
On this basis the sales of the like product of the analogue country producer in the domestic market were representative.
Ta prodaja se je štela za reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg prodaje neodvisnim strankam v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega kitajskega izvoza izdelka, ki se pregleduje, v Unijo, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 111 v nadaljevanju.
The Commission subsequently examined for the analogue country producer whether the like product sold domestically was profitable during the review investigation period and thus could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila prodaja podobnega izdelka proizvajalca iz primerljive države na domačem trgu reprezentativna.
The volume of profitable sales of the like product represented less than 80 % of the total sales volume of the like product, thus the normal value was based on the actual domestic price calculated as a weighted average of profitable sales only.
Komisija je nato v zvezi s proizvajalcem v primerljivi državi proučila, ali je bil izdelek, ki se je prodajal na domačem trgu, v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom dobičkonosen in bi se tako lahko zanj štelo, da je bil proizveden v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
Export price
Obseg dobičkonosne prodaje podobnega izdelka je predstavljal manj kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje podobnega izdelka, zato je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani le kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje.
As mentioned above in recital (21), due to the non-cooperation of the Chinese exporting producers, the export price was based on facts available, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the information from Eurostat revised with the data received from users that imported tungsten carbide from China.
Izvozna cena
Exports from China were made under both, the inward processing procedure [12] (‘IPP’) and the normal regime.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj v uvodni izjavi 21, je zaradi nesodelovanja kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov izvozna cena v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe temeljila na razpoložljivih dejstvih, tj. na informacijah Eurostata, revidiranih s podatki, prejetimi od uporabnikov, ki so uvažali volframov karbid iz Kitajske.
As shown in recital (111), since the exports made under the normal regime represented only 0,1 % of the Union market share during the RIP, they were considered negligible and calculations were performed on the export price under the IPP only.
Izvoz iz Kitajske je potekal v okviru postopka aktivnega oplemenitenja [12] in običajnega režima.
Comparison
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 111, se je izvoz v okviru običajnega režima glede na to, da je v OPP predstavljal samo 0,1 % tržnega deleža Unije, štel za zanemarljivega, izračuni pa so bili opravljeni samo za izvozno ceno v okviru postopka aktivnega oplemenitenja.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price thus established on an ex-works basis.
Primerjava
Where justified for the purpose of a fair comparison, the export price and normal value were adjusted for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je določila normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno na podlagi franko tovarna.
Adjustments were made for transport costs (domestic and ocean freight) and export tax of 5 % (repealed in May 2015) based on the facts available, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, i.e. the request for review.
Kadar je bilo to upravičeno s potrebo po zagotovitvi poštene primerjave, sta se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe izvozna cena in normalna vrednost prilagodili za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
Several interested parties claimed that the Chinese producers have a comparative advantage regarding the price of the raw material, namely APT and therefore lower production costs.
Prilagoditve za prevozne stroške (domači in čezmorski prevoz) in izvozni davek v višini 5 % (ukinjen maja 2015) so bile v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe izvedene na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev, tj. zahtevka za pregled.
They also claimed that Chinese exporting producers had a more efficient production and economies of scale.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da imajo kitajski proizvajalci primerjalno prednost, kar zadeva ceno surovin, tj. APT, in zato nižje proizvodne stroške.
These elements should be taken into consideration when calculating the dumping margin.
Trdile so tudi, da so imeli kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki učinkovitejšo proizvodnjo in ekonomijo obsega.
As noted in the recital (21) above, none of the Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers provided the Commission with a questionnaire reply.
Te elemente bi bilo treba upoštevati pri izračunu stopnje dampinga.
In addition, none of those interested parties provided evidence which supported their claim.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 21 zgoraj, noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik/skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov Komisiji ni predložila izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
Therefore, it was not possible to evaluate any alleged comparative advantage vis-à-vis the analogue country producer in the production process of the Chinese producers.
Poleg tega nobena od zainteresiranih strani ni predložila dokazov v podporo svoji trditvi.
The argument was therefore rejected.
Zato v proizvodnem postopku kitajskih proizvajalcev ni bilo mogoče oceniti domnevne primerjalne prednosti v primerjavi s proizvajalcem iz primerljive države.
After disclosure, several users claimed that differences in quality for uses, costs of production and sales must be taken into account when calculating dumping and injury margins.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
In this regard, as explained above in recitals (34) and (37), the three product types have similar physical and chemical characteristics and similar applications.
Po razkritju je več uporabnikov trdilo, da je treba pri izračunu stopenj dampinga in škode upoštevati razlike v kakovosti za uporabe, stroške proizvodnje in prodajo.
Moreover, as stated in recital (21) none of the Chinese exporting producers submitted a reply to the questionnaire.
V zvezi s tem, kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj v uvodnih izjavah 34 in 37, imajo vse tri vrste izdelka podobne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter podobne uporabe.
The Commission was therefore not able to assess, among other elements, the type of products they manufacture, the differences in their quality and in their end uses, the cost structure and their sales prices.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 21, noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
Therefore, this claim was rejected
Zato Komisija, poleg drugih elementov, ni mogla oceniti vrste izdelkov, ki jih proizvajajo, razlik v kakovosti in njihovih končnih uporabah, strukture stroškov in njihovih prodajnih cen.
Furthermore, several users claimed after disclosure that by not using product control numbers in this investigation, the Commission departed from its normal practice.
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
The original investigation established that there was no need to use different product control numbers in order to differentiate within the product types for the calculation of, inter alia, dumping margins.
Poleg tega je po razkritju več uporabnikov trdilo, da se je Komisija zaradi neuporabe kontrolnih številk izdelka v tej preiskavi oddaljila od svoje običajne prakse.
The current investigation confirmed that no change in factual circumstances that would have justified a deviation from the original methodology took place.
V prvotni preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da za izračun, med drugim, stopenj dampinga ni bilo treba uporabljati različnih kontrolnih številk izdelka, da bi se razlikovalo med vrstami izdelka.