natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 of 4 October 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories with regard to regulatory technical standards for risk-mitigation techniques for OTC derivative contracts not cleared by a central counterparty (OJ L 340, 15.12.2016, p. 9).
Da bi preprečili vsakršno prekinitev uporabe obdobij postopnega uvajanja za začetno in gibljivo kritje, bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati čim prej in se uporabljati retroaktivno –
amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards specifications for Basic methacrylate copolymer (E 1205)
o spremembi Priloge k Uredbi (EU) št. 231/2012 o določitvi specifikacij za aditive za živila, navedene v prilogah II in III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, glede specifikacij za osnovni kopolimer metakrilata (E 1205)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food additives [1], and in particular Article 14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o aditivih za živila [1] in zlasti člena 14 Uredbe,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 establishing a common authorisation procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings [2], and in particular Article 7(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1331/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o vzpostavitvi skupnega postopka odobritve za aditive za živila, encime za živila in arome za živila [2] ter zlasti člena 7(5) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 [3] lays down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008.
V Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 231/2012 [3] so določene specifikacije za aditive za živila, navedene v prilogah II in III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008.
Those specifications may be updated in accordance with the common procedure referred to in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008, either on the initiative of the Commission or following an application.
Navedene specifikacije se lahko na pobudo Komisije ali na podlagi zahtevka posodobijo v skladu s skupnim postopkom iz člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1331/2008.
On 21 November 2014, an application was submitted for the amendment of the specifications concerning the food additive basic methacrylate copolymer (E 1205).
Dne 21. novembra 2014 je bil vložen zahtevek za spremembo specifikacij za aditiv za živila osnovni kopolimer metakrilata (E 1205).
The application was made available to the Member States pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008.
Zahtevek je bil državam članicam dan na voljo v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1331/2008.
The applicant has requested the definition of the food additive to be amended with regard to the short description of the manufacturing process due to a modernization of the manufacturing process.
Predlagatelj je zahteval, da se spremeni opredelitev aditiva za živila v zvezi s kratkim opisom proizvodnega postopka, ker se je proizvodni postopek moderniziral.
Following a thorough review of the particle size in the current specification, the applicant has requested a change in the particle size of the powder.
Po temeljitem pregledu velikosti delcev v trenutni specifikaciji je predlagatelj zahteval spremembo velikosti prašnih delcev.
The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) adopted an opinion on the safety of the proposed amendment of the specifications for basic methacrylate copolymer (E 1205) as a food additive [4].
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) je sprejela mnenje o varnosti predlagane spremembe specifikacij za osnovni kopolimer metakrilata (E 1205) kot aditiva za živila [4].
Based on the data provided by the applicant and taking into account the original evaluation of the substance in 2010 [5], the Authority concluded that the proposed amendments to the specifications of the food additive Basic methacrylate copolymer (E 1205) are not of a safety concern.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je zagotovil predlagatelj, in ob upoštevanju prvotne ocene snovi leta 2010 [5] je Agencija ugotovila, da predlagane spremembe specifikacij aditiva za živila osnovni kopolimer metakrilata (E 1205) ne predstavljajo tveganja za varnost.
Done at Brussels, 24 February 2017.
V Bruslju, 24. februarja 2017
Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 of 9 March 2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 83, 22.3.2012, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 231/2012 z dne 9. marca 2012 o določitvi specifikacij za aditive za živila, navedene v prilogah II in III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 83, 22.3.2012, str. 1).
EFSA Journal 2016;14(5):4490, p. 13.
EFSA Journal 2016; 14(5):4490, str. 13.
EFSA Journal 2010;8(2):1513, p. 23.
EFSA Journal 2010; 8(2):1513, str. 23.
In the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 231/2012, the entries for food additive E 1205 Basic methacrylate copolymer are amended as follows:
V Prilogi k Uredbi (EU) št. 231/2012 se vnosi za aditiv za živila „E 1205 OSNOVNI KOPOLIMER METAKRILATA“ spremenijo:
the entry for the definition is replaced by the following:
vnos za „Opredelitev“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Basic methacrylate copolymer is manufactured by thermic controlled polymerisation of the monomers methyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate and dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (dissolved in propan-2-ol), by using a free radical donor initiator system.
Osnovni kopolimer metakrilata se proizvaja s toplotno nadzorovano polimerizacijo monomerov metilnega metakrilata, butilnega metakrilata in dimetilaminoetilnega metakrilata, raztopljenega v propan-2-olu, z uporabo prostega radikala kot donorja, ki sproži reakcijo.
The polymer solution is extruded and granulated under vacuum to remove residual volatile components.
Polimerna raztopina se ekstrudira in granulira pod vakuumom, da se odstranijo ostale hlapne sestavine.
The granules resulting are commercialized as such or undergo a milling step (micronisation).’
Nastala zrnca se tržijo kot taka ali pa se še drugič zmeljejo (mikronizacija).“
the entry for the particle size is replaced by the following:
vnos za velikost delcev se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Particle size of the powder (when used forms a film)
„Velikost prašnih delcev (pri uporabi tvori film)
< 50 μm at least 95 %
< 50 μm najmanj 95 %
< 20 μm at least 50 %
< 20 μm najmanj 50 %
< 3 μm not more than 10 %’
< 3 μm ne več kot 10 %“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/325
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/325
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high tenacity yarns of polyesters originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
By Regulation (EU) No 1105/2010 [2] the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high tenacity yarns of polyesters originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or ‘China’).
Svet je z Uredbo (EU) št. 1105/2010 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „Kitajska“).
The measures imposed took the form of an ad valorem duty with a residual rate set at 9,8 % while the companies on which anti-dumping duties were imposed received an individual duty rate ranging from 5,1 % to 9,8 %.
Uvedeni ukrepi so bili v obliki dajatve ad valorem s stopnjo preostale dajatve v višini 9,8 %, za družbe, ki so jim bile naložene protidampinške dajatve, pa so bile uvedene individualne stopnje dajatve, ki so segale od 5,1 % do 9,8 %.
Two companies were found not to be dumping in the original investigation.
Za dve družbi je bilo v prvotni preiskavi ugotovljeno, da nista izvajali dampinga.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [3] of the anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an expiry review of these measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [3] veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged on 31 August 2015 by CIRFS (‘The European Manmade Fibres Association’ or ‘the applicant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of high tenacity yarns of polyester.
Zahtevek je 31. avgusta 2015 vložil CIRFS („Mednarodni odbor za umetno svilo in sintetična vlakna“ ali „vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation and/or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi se zaradi izteka ukrepov damping in škoda za industrijo Unije verjetno nadaljevala in/ali ponovila.
Having determined, after having consulted the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 28 November 2015, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4] (‘Notice of initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetovanju z odborom, ustanovljenim s členom 15(1) osnovne uredbe, ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov, in je 28. novembra 2015 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
Investigation of the expiry review
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepov
Relevant periods covered by the expiry review investigation
Ustrezni obdobji, zajeti v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepov
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2014 to 30 September 2015 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2014 do 30. septembra 2015 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2012 to the end of the review investigation period (the ‘period considered’).
Proučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2012 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The Commission officially advised the applicant, exporting producers and importers known to be concerned and the representatives of the exporting country concerned of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov uradno obvestila vložnika, proizvajalce izvoznike in uvoznike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike zadevne države izvoznice.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time-limits set in the Notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da v rokih iz obvestila o začetku pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
No interested party requested a hearing with the Commission.
Nobena zainteresirana stran ni zahtevala zaslišanja pred Komisijo.
In view of the apparent large number of Chinese exporting producers and unrelated importers in the Union, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitno velikega števila kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in nepovezanih uvoznikov v Uniji je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a representative sample, Chinese exporting producers and unrelated importers were requested to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the review and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the Notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala reprezentativni vzorec, so bili kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki in nepovezani uvozniki pozvani, naj se v 15 dneh po začetku pregleda javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
No Chinese exporting producer cooperated with the investigation.
V preiskavi ni sodeloval noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik.
In total six known unrelated importers were contacted at the stage of the publication of the Notice of initiation.
V fazi objave obvestila o začetku so bili stiki vzpostavljeni s skupaj šestimi znanimi nepovezanimi uvozniki.
Replies were received from 15 unrelated importers.
Odgovorilo je 15 nepovezanih uvoznikov.
In view of the large number of cooperating importers the Commission applied sampling.
Zaradi velikega števila sodelujočih uvoznikov je Komisija uporabila vzorčenje.
The Commission selected the sample on the basis of the largest representative volume of imports which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Vzorec je izbrala na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega uvoza, ki ga je bilo mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati.
The selected sample originally consisted of three companies and represented 29 % of the estimated import volume from the PRC to the Union and 85 % of the import volumes reported by the 15 respondents.
Izbrani vzorec so prvotno sestavljale tri družbe ter je predstavljal 29 % ocenjenega obsega uvoza iz LRK v Unijo in 85 % obsega uvoza, ki ga je sporočilo 15 nepovezanih uvoznikov, ki se je odzvalo na obvestilo o začetku.
A questionnaire reply was received only from one unrelated importer.
Izpolnjen vprašalnik je poslal samo en nepovezani uvoznik.
In total 10 known users were contacted at the stage of the publication of the Notice of initiation.
V fazi objave obvestila o začetku so bili stiki vzpostavljeni s skupaj desetimi znanimi uporabniki.
Replies were received from four of them.
Odgovorili so štirje.
Sampling was not envisaged for users and the Commission decided to investigate all.
Za uporabnike vzorčenje ni bilo predvideno, ampak se je Komisija odločila, da bo preiskala vse.
Five Union producers which represented around 97 % of the Union production of high tenacity yarns of polyesters in the RIP cooperated with the Commission.
S Komisijo je sodelovalo pet proizvajalcev Unije, ki so v OPP predstavljali približno 97 % proizvodnje preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra v Uniji.
In view of this small number, the Commission decided not to apply sampling.
Glede na to majhno število se je Komisija odločila, da ne bo uporabila vzorčenja.
Questionnaires were sent to the five cooperating Union producers and to one producer in a potential analogue country, who agreed to cooperate.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani petim sodelujočim proizvajalcem Unije in enemu proizvajalcu v morebitni primerljivi državi, ki je pristal na sodelovanje.
Brilen Tech SA, Spain
Brilen Tech S. A., Španija,
Sioen Industries NV, Belgium
Sioen Industries NV, Belgija,
DuraFiber Technologies (DFT) SAS, France
DuraFiber Technologies (DFT) SAS, Francija,
DuraFiber Technologies (DFT) GmbH, Germany
DuraFiber Technologies (DFT) GmbH, Nemčija,
PHP Fibers GmbH, Germany
PHP Fibers GmbH, Nemčija;
DuraFiber Technologies, United States of America (‘USA’).
DuraFiber Technologies, Združene države Amerike („ZDA“).
The product concerned is high tenacity yarn of polyesters (other than sewing thread), not put up for retail sale, including monofilament of less than 67 decitex originating in the PRC (‘the product concerned’ or ‘HTY’) currently falling within CN code 54022000.
Zadevni izdelek je preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra (razen sukanca za šivanje), ki ni pripravljena za prodajo na drobno, vključno z monofilamenti številke manj kot 67 deciteksov, s poreklom iz LRK („zadevni izdelek“ ali „PVT“), trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN 54022000.
The review investigation confirmed that the product concerned, high tenacity yarns of polyesters produced and sold by the Union industry on the Union market and high tenacity yarns of polyesters produced and sold in the analogue country (USA) have the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je potrdila, da imajo zadevni izdelek, preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra, ki jo industrija Unije proizvaja in prodaja na trgu Unije, ter preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v primerljivi državi (ZDA), enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemične lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping from the PRC.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping iz LRK zaradi izteka obstoječih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
Cooperation from the PRC
Sodelovanje iz LRK
In the absence of cooperation from exporting producers in the PRC, the overall analysis, including the dumping calculation, was based on facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi nesodelovanja proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK je splošna analiza, vključno z izračunom dampinga, temeljila na razpoložljivih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping was assessed by using the expiry review request, combined with other sources of information, such as trade statistics on imports and exports (Eurostat and Chinese export data), the reply from the analogue country producer and other information publicly available [5].
Zato je bila verjetnost nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga ocenjena na podlagi zahtevka za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov v povezavi z drugimi viri informacij, kot so trgovinski statistični podatki o uvozu in izvozu (Eurostat in kitajski podatki o izvozu), odgovor proizvajalca iz primerljive države in druge javno dostopne informacije [5].
The absence of cooperation affected the comparison of the normal value with the export price of the various product types.
Nesodelovanje je vplivalo na primerjavo normalne vrednosti z izvozno ceno različnih vrst izdelka.
In accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, it was considered appropriate to establish both the normal value and the export price on a global basis.
V skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe se je zdelo primerno določiti normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno na svetovni ravni.
In accordance with Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation, the same methodology used to establish dumping in the original investigation was followed whenever it was found that circumstances had not changed.
V skladu s členom 11(9) osnovne uredbe je bila uporabljena enaka metodologija kot za določitev dampinga v prvotni preiskavi, kadar je bilo ugotovljeno, da se okoliščine niso spremenile.
Normal value was determined on the basis of the prices paid in an appropriate market economy third country (the ‘analogue country’), in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je bila v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cen v ustrezni tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“).
In the original investigation Taiwan was used as analogue country for the purposes of establishing the normal value with regard to the PRC.
V prvotni preiskavi je bil Tajvan uporabljen kot primerljiva država za določitev normalne vrednosti v zvezi z LRK.
In the Notice of initiation the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged using Taiwan as analogue country and invited parties to comment.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da namerava kot primerljivo državo uporabiti Tajvan, in jih pozvala k predložitvi pripomb.
The Notice of initiation also added that, according to the information available to the Commission, other market economy suppliers of the Union may have been located, inter alia, in the USA and the Republic of Korea.
V obvestilu o začetku je bilo dodano tudi, da so lahko glede na informacije, ki so na voljo Komisiji, drugi dobavitelji Unije s tržnim gospodarstvom med drugim v ZDA in Republiki Koreji.
One interested party supported the choice of Taiwan as analogue country, because of the similar equipment and production process to the ones used by Chinese producers.
Ena zainteresirana stran je podprla izbiro Tajvana kot primerljive države, ker so oprema in proizvodni postopki podobni tistim, ki jih uporabljajo kitajski proizvajalci.
However, no producer from Taiwan agreed to cooperate with the investigation.
Vendar ni v sodelovanje v preiskavi privolil noben proizvajalec iz Tajvana.
Based on the import statistics and information from the review request, in addition to Taiwan, the Commission considered a number of other countries as potential analogue countries, such as the Republic of Korea, India, Japan, and the USA [6].
Komisija je na podlagi statističnih podatkov o uvozu in informacij iz zahtevka za pregled poleg Tajvana kot morebitne primerljive države proučila več drugih držav, kot so Republika Koreja, Indija, Japonska in ZDA [6].
Requests for cooperation were sent to all known producers and associations from these countries.
Zahteve za sodelovanje so bile poslane vsem znanim proizvajalcem in združenjem v teh državah.
Only one producer in the USA (Dura Fibres) agreed to cooperate.
V sodelovanje je privolil samo en proizvajalec v ZDA (Dura Fibres).
The Commission found that the USA has a significant (8,8 %) conventional customs duty rate on imports of HTY from third countries, but no anti-dumping duties.
Komisija je ugotovila, da imajo ZDA precej visoko (8,8 %) konvencionalno carinsko stopnjo za uvoz PVT iz tretjih držav, nimajo pa protidampinških dajatev.
Dura Fibres is the only producer of the product concerned in the USA having around 30 % market share during the review investigation period, it is subject to strong competition from exporting countries [7].
Družba Dura Fibres, ki je edina proizvajalka zadevnega izdelka v ZDA in je imela v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom približno 30-odstotni tržni delež, se sooča z močno konkurenco iz držav izvoznic [7].
In view of the above and in the absence of any further comments, the Commission concluded that the USA is an appropriate analogue country under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je glede na navedeno in ob neobstoju nadaljnjih pripomb sklenila, da so ZDA ustrezna primerljiva država na podlagi člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The information received from the cooperating producer in the analogue country was used as a basis for the determination of the normal value.
Kot podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti so bile uporabljene informacije, ki jih je zagotovil sodelujoči proizvajalec v primerljivi državi.