natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the provisional anti-dumping duty was imposed (the provisional disclosure), several interested parties made written submissions.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila uvedena začasna protidampinška dajatev (začasno razkritje), je več zainteresiranih strani predložilo pisna stališča.
As set out in detail from recital (135) and following below, one interested party was invited by the Commission services to request the intervention by the Hearing Officer in certain trade proceedings (‘the Hearing Officer’) on the accuracy of the provisional calculations and on his right to access confidential information.
Kot je podrobno navedeno v uvodni izjavi 135 in v nadaljevanju, so službe Komisije pozvale eno zainteresirano stran, naj zahteva posredovanje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje v nekaterih trgovinskih postopkih („pooblaščenec za zaslišanje“) v zvezi z natančnostjo začasnih izračunov in njegovo pravico do dostopa do zaupnih informacij.
This hearing took place on 7 February 2017.
To zaslišanje je potekalo 7. februarja 2017.
In order to have at its disposal more comprehensive data on the Union's cost of production (per product type per quarter of the investigation period), the sampled Union producers were requested to provide additional data.
Vzorčene proizvajalce Unije je pozvala, naj predložijo dodatne podatke, da bi tako dobila celovitejše podatke o stroških proizvodnje Unije (za vrsto izdelka na četrtletje obdobja preiskave).
All sampled Union producers submitted the requested information.
Vsi vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije so predložili zahtevane informacije.
The Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the product concerned into the Union.
Komisija je vse strani obvestila o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the definitive disclosure.
Za vse strani je bil določen rok, v katerem so lahko predložile pripombe glede dokončnega razkritja.
The comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani so se proučile in upoštevale, kjer je bilo primerno.
Recital (24) of the provisional Regulation set out the provisional definition of the product concerned.
Zadevni izdelek je začasno opredeljen v uvodni izjavi 24 začasne uredbe.
Recitals (29) to (35) of the provisional Regulation set out the claim from a Chinese exporting producer and an importer to exclude tool steel and high-speed steel from the product scope, and the reasons why the Commission provisionally excluded tool steel and high-speed steel from the product scope.
V uvodnih izjavah od 29 do 35 začasne uredbe so predstavljeni zahteva kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika in uvoznika po izključitvi orodnega jekla in hitroreznega jekla iz obsega izdelka ter razlogi, zaradi katerih je Komisija orodno jeklo in hitrorezno jeklo začasno izključila iz obsega izdelka.
Following definitive disclosure, the complainant reiterated its comment that this claim was not well founded and that there is a risk of circumvention in case these claims would be accepted by the Commission.
Pritožnik je po dokončnem razkritju ponovil svojo pripombo, da ta zahteva ni utemeljena in da obstaja tveganje izogibanja ukrepom, če bi jo Komisija sprejela.
The Commission observed that it already considered the risk of circumvention at provisional stage.
Komisija je pripomnila, da je tveganje izogibanja ukrepom obravnavala že v začasni fazi.
As laid out in recital (34) of the provisional Regulation, it found that imports of tool steel and high-speed steel account volume-wise for about 1,25 % of total Chinese imports in 2015, and that they fall under different, specific CN codes.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 34 začasne uredbe, je ugotovila, da uvoz orodnega jekla in hitroreznega jekla po obsegu zajema približno 1,25 % celotnega kitajskega uvoza v letu 2015 ter da se izdelka uvrščata pod druge specifične oznake KN.
Furthermore, the Commission did not receive any evidence which would indicate a change in pattern of trade after the imposition of provisional measures, suggesting potential circumvention.
Poleg tega ni Komisija po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov prejela nobenih dokazov o spremembi vzorca trgovanja, ki bi pomenila morebitno izogibanje ukrepom.
For the reasons set out in recitals (32) to (34) of the provisional Regulation and absent any new facts or evidence, the Commission maintained its decision to exclude tool steel and high-speed steel from the product scope.
Iz razlogov iz uvodnih izjav od 32 do 34 začasne uredbe in ker niso bila predložena nobena nova dejstva ali dokazi, Komisija vztraja pri odločitvi o izključitvi orodnega jekla in hitroreznega jekla iz obsega izdelka.
Recitals (36) to (37) of the provisional Regulation set out the claim of an Italian user to exclude certain other product types from the product scope.
V uvodnih izjavah 36 in 37 začasne uredbe je predstavljena zahteva italijanskega uporabnika, da je treba nekatere druge vrste izdelkov izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
As stated in recitals (38) and (39) of the provisional Regulation, the Commission provisionally rejected these requests but stated that it would further investigate this product exclusion request.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 38 in 39 začasne uredbe, je Komisija te zahtevke začasno zavrnila, vendar navedla, da bo ta zahtevek o izključitvi izdelka dodatno proučila.
Following the provisional disclosure, this Italian user reiterated its request.
Po začasnem razkritju je ta italijanski uporabnik znova predložil zahtevek.
During an on spot verification visit in the premises of the company, the Commission sought to clarify the points raised by this user.
Komisija je med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem v prostorih družbe poskušala razjasniti vprašanja, na katera je opozoril ta uporabnik.
However, the user did not bring forward any new element during these discussions.
Vendar ni uporabnik med temi razpravami predložil nobenega novega elementa.
Accordingly, the Commission rejected these claims and confirmed its conclusions reached in recitals (38) and (39) of the provisional Regulation.
Zato je Komisija te trditve zavrnila in potrdila svoje sklepe iz uvodnih izjav 38 in 39 začasne uredbe.
Following final disclosure, the Italian user reiterated its request to exclude Interstitial-Free (IF) steel types, dual-phase steel types, high carbon steel types, and non-grain oriented steel types of the product concerned.
Italijanski uporabnik je po dokončnem razkritju ponovil svojo zahtevo, naj se v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom izključijo vrste jekla IF (jeklo brez intersticijsko raztopljenih elementov), vrste dualnega jekla, vrste mnogoogljičnega jekla in vrste jekla, ki niso zrnato usmerjene.
This user referred to a discussion with Commission investigators, during which the user claims that the Commission officials would have accepted that there is a difference in terms of chemical characteristics and end-uses between ‘ordinary’ and other high-quality types of the product concerned.
Ta uporabnik se je skliceval na razpravo s preiskovalci Komisije, med katero naj bi uradniki Komisije glede na njegove trditve priznali razliko v kemijskih značilnostih in končnih uporabah med „navadnim“ zadevnim izdelkom in drugimi vrstami zadevnega izdelka visoke kakovosti.
Moreover, this user referred to two other investigations where the Commission would have decided to exclude certain product types.
Poleg tega se je skliceval še na drugi preiskavi, pri katerih naj bi se Komisija odločila izključiti nekatere vrste izdelka.
The first case was an anti-circumvention investigation concerning certain aluminium foil from the People's Republic of China based on an alleged slight modification of the product.
Prvi primer se je nanašal na preiskavo proti izogibanju v zvezi z nekaterimi aluminijastimi folijami iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki je temeljila na domnevni manjši spremembi izdelka.
In that case, a particular type of aluminium foil used for further processing was allegedly excluded from the extension to the slightly modified product [6].
V navedenem primeru je bila določena vrsta aluminijaste folije, ki se uporablja za nadaljnjo predelavo, domnevno izključena iz razširitve na nekoliko spremenjen izdelek [6].
The second case concerned an investigation on certain corrosion resistant steels (CRS) originating in the People's Republic of China [7], where the product scope was so defined to exclude the automotive grades from the scope of the measures.
Drugi primer se je nanašal na preiskavo nekaterih jekel, odpornih proti koroziji, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske [7], v zvezi s katerimi je bil obseg izdelka opredeljen tako, da so bili iz področja uporabe ukrepov izključeni avtomobilski razredi (automotive grades).
The Commission rejected this request.
Komisija je ta zahtevek zavrnila.
First, the meeting at the premises of the company was an exchange of information to clarify some points which were raised by the user.
Prvič, namen sestanka v prostorih podjetja je bil izmenjava informacij, da bi se pojasnila nekatera vprašanja, na katera je opozoril uporabnik.
The user cannot draw any legitimate expectations from such kind of informal meeting.
Uporabnik ne more imeti legitimnih pričakovanj na podlagi takega neuradnega sestanka.
Moreover, contrary to what is claimed by the user, the Commission investigators never agreed that there was a difference between certain types of the product concerned in terms of chemical characteristics and end-uses.
Poleg tega niso preiskovalci Komisije v nasprotju z navedbami uporabnika nikoli priznali razlik med nekaterimi vrstami zadevnega izdelka v smislu kemijskih značilnosti in končnih uporab.
Second, it is true that the current description and the CN codes of the product concerned do include a wide variety of types from a quality perspective.
Drugič, z vidika kakovosti sedanji opis in oznake KN zadevnega izdelka dejansko vključujejo veliko različnih vrst.
However, the production of high-quality types of the product concerned by both the Union and exporting producers is inherent to the production process of the product concerned, and higher quality types are made from the same basic material and on the same production equipment.
Vendar proizvodni postopek zadevnega izdelka, ki ga izvajajo Unija in proizvajalci izvozniki, že vključuje proizvodnjo visokokakovostnih vrst zadevnega izdelka, pri čemer so vrste višje kakovosti proizvedene iz enakega proizvodnega materiala in z isto proizvodno opremo.
Therefore, such argument is not sufficient to lead to the exclusion requested by the user.
Zato ta trditev ne zadostuje za izključitev, ki jo zahteva uporabnik.
Third, the two cases to which the user refers are both ongoing and no final conclusions have been made.
Tretjič, primera preiskav, na katera se sklicuje uporabnik, še vedno potekata, končni sklep pa še ni bil sprejet.
In addition, one of these cases (the case concerning the particular type of aluminium foil) concerns an anti-circumvention case, and is therefore not relevant.
Poleg tega se eden od teh primerov (ki zadeva določeno vrsto aluminijaste folije) nanaša na zadevo proti izogibanju, zato je brezpredmeten.
Fourth, for the different types of the product concerned, including the so-called high-quality types, it is not possible to identify the difference between the numerous types of the product concerned based on visual inspection, and therefore an exclusion would be unmanageable by customs authorities.
Četrtič, pri različnih vrstah zadevnega izdelka, vključno s tako imenovanimi visokokakovostnimi vrstami, razlike med številnimi vrstami zadevnega izdelka ni mogoče določiti na podlagi vizualnega pregleda, zato carinski organi ne bi mogli izvajati izključitve.
Fifth, in many cases, the products cannot even be differentiated by chemical analysis or microstructural tests, since such specific characteristics only arise later during the further cold rolling process.
Petič, izdelkov v veliko primerih ni mogoče razlikovati niti s kemijsko analizo ali mikrostrukturnimi testi, ker se te posebne značilnosti pojavijo šele pozneje med nadaljnjim postopkom hladnega valjanja.
In conclusion, these types of a relatively higher quality also fully meet the definition of the product concerned, and no convincing argument has been brought forward to exclude them from the scope of the product concerned.
Skratka, za te vrste, ki so razmeroma višje kakovosti, tudi v celoti velja opredelitev zadevnega izdelka, za njihovo izključitev iz obsega zadevnega izdelka pa prepričljiv argument ni bil predložen.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the product scope and the like product, the conclusions reached in recitals (24) to (28) of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Drugih pripomb v zvezi z obsegom izdelka in podobnim izdelkom ni bilo, zato se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 24 do 28 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The product concerned is thus defined as certain flat-rolled products of iron, non-alloy steel or other alloy steel, whether or not in coils (including ‘cut-to-length’ and ‘narrow strip’ products), not further worked than hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated, originating in the PRC.
Zadevni izdelek je torej opredeljen kot nekateri ploščato valjani izdelki iz železa, nelegiranega jekla ali drugega legiranega jekla, v kolobarjih ali ne (vključno z „razrezanimi izdelki“ in „ozkimi trakovi“), vroče valjani, brez nadaljnje obdelave, neplatirani, neprevlečeni in neprekriti ter s poreklom iz LRK.
products of tool steel and high-speed steel,
izdelkov iz orodnega jekla in hitroreznega jekla,
products, not in coils, without patterns in relief, of a thickness exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 600 mm or more, and
izdelkov, ki niso v kolobarjih, brez reliefnih vzorcev, debeline več kot 10 mm in širine 600 mm ali več, ter
products, not in coils, without patterns in relief, of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more but not exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 2050 mm or more.
izdelkov, ki niso v kolobarjih, brez reliefnih vzorcev, debeline 4,75 mm ali več, toda največ 10 mm, in širine 2050 mm ali več.
The product concerned is currently falling within CN codes 72081000, 72082500, 72082600, 72082700, 72083600, 72083700, 72083800, 72083900, 72084000, 72085210, 72085299, 72085310, 72085390, 72085400, 72111300, 72111400, 72111900, ex72251910, 72253090, ex72254060, 72254090, ex72261910, 72269191 and 72269199.
Zadevni izdelek se trenutno uvršča pod oznake KN 72081000, 72082500, 72082600, 72082700, 72083600, 72083700, 72083800, 72083900, 72084000, 72085210, 72085299, 72085310, 72085390, 72085400, 72111300, 72111400, 72111900, ex72251910, 72253090, ex72254060, 72254090, ex72261910, 72269191 in 72269199.
After the imposition of provisional measures, and following definitive disclosure, the Chinese Iron and Steel Association (CISA) claimed that the difference between the injury and dumping margins raised doubts as to the accuracy of the Commission's methodology.
Kitajsko združenje železarjev in jeklarjev (CISA) je po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov in po dokončnem razkritju trdilo, da razlika med škodo in stopnjo dampinga poraja dvome o točnosti metodologije Komisije.
CISA estimated that the normal value in the analogue country was 61 % higher than the target price for the Union industry.
Ocenilo je, da je normalna vrednost v primerljivi državi 61 % višja od ciljne cene za industrijo Unije.
According to CISA, normal values provided by a producer which is related to the complainant, as it is the case for the present investigation, are sometimes abnormally high.
Po njegovih navedbah so normalne vrednosti, ki jih zagotovi proizvajalec, povezan s pritožnikom, kot velja v tej preiskavi, včasih neobičajno visoke.
Furthermore, CISA claimed that, if the data is factually correct, in view of such difference, the Commission should invalidate the choice of the USA as a valid analogue country, make adjustments to the data or use EU data instead.
Poleg tega je združenje CISA trdilo, da bi morala Komisija, če so podatki točni, zaradi take razlike razveljaviti izbiro ZDA kot upravičene primerljive države, prilagoditi podatke ali namesto tega uporabiti podatke EU.
Under Union law, the Commission is entitled to use prices of companies related to EU producers when the analogue country is appropriate.
Komisija je v skladu s pravom Unije upravičena do uporabe cen podjetij, povezanih s proizvajalci EU, če je primerljiva država ustrezna.
This was the case for investigations on high fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars (South Africa) [8] and on cold-rolled flat steel products (Canada) [9], as mentioned by CISA itself.
Tako je bilo v zvezi s preiskavama o armaturnih palicah iz jekla z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti (Južna Afrika) [8] in hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkih (Kanada) [9], kot je navedlo samo združenje CISA.
The existence of a relationship between the analogue country producer and a Union producer does not invalidate or affect the determination of the normal value which is based on duly verified data.
Obstoj razmerja med proizvajalcem iz primerljive države in proizvajalcem Unije ne razveljavi določitve normalne vrednosti, ki temelji na ustrezno preverjenih podatkih, niti ne vpliva nanjo.
The USA is a competitive market with ten domestic producers and substantial imports from several countries.
Zato Komisija ne vidi razloga, zakaj ne bi uporabila cen ZDA.
It has anti-dumping and countervailing measures in force, which allows its companies to operate under normal conditions of competition.
Poleg tega niso bili predloženi dokazi, ki bi utemeljevali prilagoditev.
Therefore, the Commission sees no reason for not using USA prices.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran znova podvomila o izbiri ZDA kot utemeljene primerljive države v obravnavanem primeru, pri čemer je dvomila o zanesljivosti normalne vrednosti v navedeni državi, ki je po njenem mnenju v primerjavi s ceno na trgu Unije veliko previsoka.
In addition, no supporting evidence was provided that would justify making an adjustment.
Ker so bili podatki proizvajalca v primerljivi državi preverjeni in je bila pravilnost teh podatkov potrjena, je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
After definitive disclosure, one interested part questioned again the choice of the USA as a valid analogue country in the present case, questioning the reliability of the normal value in that country which it found much too high as compared to the price on the Union market.
Kar zadeva predlog za cene, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo v Uniji, se s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe dovoljuje uporaba teh cen le, če ni mogoča uporaba cen iz tretje države s tržnim gospodarstvom ali njenega izvoza.
Given that the data of the analogue country producer have been verified and have been found to be correct, that argument was rejected.
Ker je v obravnavanem primeru uporaba cen ZDA (metoda primerljive države) mogoča, je bil ta predlog zavrnjen.
As regards the suggestion for prices actually paid or payable in the Union, Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation only allows for the use of these prices when the use of prices in or exports of a market economy third country is not possible.
Komisija je zato svoje ugotovitve v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo potrdila.
Given that it is possible to use the US prices (analogue country method) in the present case, this suggestion was dismissed.
Izvozne cene
The Commission hence confirmed its findings with regard to the normal value.
Komisija je v začasni fazi prilagodila transakcije, pri katerih proizvajalci izvozniki izvažajo zadevni izdelek v Unijo prek povezanih družb, ki prevzamejo vlogo uvoznika.
Export prices
Te prilagoditve so bile izvedene ob sklicevanju na dejanski dobiček povezanih uvoznikov.
At provisional stage, the Commission made adjustments to transactions where the exporting producers export the product concerned to the Union through related companies acting as an importer.
Zaradi odnosa med temi proizvajalci izvozniki in povezanimi trgovci/uvozniki pa je treba dejanski dobiček povezanih uvoznikov šteti za nezanesljiv.
These adjustments were made with reference to the actual profit of the related importers.
Zato bi moral preiskovalni organ v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe na razumni osnovi določiti ustrezno stopnjo dobička.
Because of the relationship between these exporting producers and the related traders/importers, the actual profits of related importers must however be considered unreliable.
Po mnenju Komisije je v tem primeru razumno osnovo predstavljal dobiček nepovezanega uvoznika.
For this reason, in line with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, an adequate profit margin should be established by the investigation authority on a reasonable basis.
Ker pa ni Komisija med to preiskavo k sodelovanju pritegnila nobenega nepovezanega uvoznika, je uporabila dobiček nepovezanega uvoznika zelo podobnega izdelka.
The Commission considered that the profits made by an unrelated importer constitute a reasonable basis in this situation.
Uporabila je torej dobiček uvoznika hladno valjanih ploščatih jeklenih izdelkov, ki so v številnih vidikih podobni zadevnemu izdelku, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 221 začasne uredbe.
However, considering that the Commission did not obtain cooperation from any unrelated importer during this investigation, it resorted to the profit of an unrelated importer of a closely resembling product.
Ta dobiček je bil določen pri preiskavi hladno valjanih ploščatih jeklenih izdelkov iz uvodne izjave 24 zgoraj.
Therefore, the Commission used the profit of an importer of cold-rolled flat steel products, which is similar in many respects to the product concerned, as explained in recital (221) of the provisional regulation.
Izračun izvoznih cen je bil ustrezno prilagojen.
This profit was determined in the investigation on cold-rolled flat steel products mentioned in recital (24) above.
Primerjava
The calculation of the export prices was adjusted accordingly.
Proizvajalec izvoznik Jiangsu Shagang Group je trdil, da Komisija ni razkrila vseh prilagoditev, izvedenih v zvezi z izvozno ceno družbe Shagang, pri čemer je navedel eno določeno prilagoditev.
Comparison
Komisija je pojasnila, da je bila pravna podlaga za to prilagoditev člen 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe, saj se nanaša na pribitek, ki ga je prejela povezana družba, katere funkcije so podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
The exporting producer Jiangsu Shagang Group claimed that the Commission did not disclose all adjustments carried out on Shagang's export price and referred to one specific adjustment.
Družba Shagang je odgovorila, da bi jo bilo treba skupaj z njenimi povezanimi družbami obravnavati kot en sam gospodarski subjekt, zato se ta prilagoditev ne bi smela izvesti.
The Commission clarified that the legal ground for this adjustment was Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation as it refers to a mark-up received by a related company which performs functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Na zahtevo družbe Shagang je 16. novembra 2016 potekalo zaslišanje med družbo Shagang in službami Komisije, da bi se to vprašanje dodatno obravnavalo.
In response, Shagang claimed that it should be considered a single economic entity together with its related companies and, therefore, this adjustment should not be made.
Poleg tega je po dokončnem razkritju 12. januarja 2017 potekalo drugo zaslišanje, da bi se med drugim obravnavala ta prilagoditev.
On 16 November 2016, following a request from Shagang, a hearing took place between Shagang and the Commission services to further discuss this issue.
Družba Shagang je ponovila, da njeni povezani družbi (dva trgovca s sedežem v Hongkongu oziroma Singapurju), kar zadeva izdelke iz jekla, trgujeta le z izdelki družbe Shagang in da dejstvo, da sta povezana trgovca vključena tudi v trgovanje z izdelki (poleg izdelkov iz jekla), ki jih ne proizvaja družba Shagang, ni pomembno za določitev obstoja enega samega gospodarskega subjekta.