natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It can be used in professional medical practice and in research, sport, business etc. (for example, oxygen chambers, extreme mountaineering in low oxygen atmosphere, deep-sea diving; by pilots, firefighters, astronauts etc.).
Uporablja se lahko v strokovni medicinski praksi ter tudi v raziskavah, športu, za poslovne potrebe ipd. (na primer v kisikovih komorah, ekstremnem alpinizmu na območjih z manj kisika, potapljanju v velikih globinah; uporabljajo ga lahko tudi piloti, gasilci, astronavti itn.).
Classification is determined by general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 9018, 901819 and 90181910.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošni pravili 1 in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature ter besedilo oznak KN 9018, 901819 in 90181910.
The apparatus falls under the scope of heading 9018 which covers a very wide range of instruments and appliances which, in the vast majority of cases, are used only in professional practice to prevent or treat an illness or to operate, etc.
Aparat spada na področje uporabe tarifne številke 9018, ki zajema širok spekter instrumentov in aparatov, ki jih v večini primerov uporabljajo samo zdravstveni delavci za preprečevanje ali zdravljenje bolezni ali pri operacijah ipd.
The instruments and appliances classified here may be equipped with optical devices; they may also make use of electricity (see also the Harmonised System Explanatory Notes to heading 9018).
Pod navedeno tarifno številko uvrščeni instrumenti in aparati so lahko opremljeni z optičnimi napravami; lahko tudi uporabljajo električno energijo (glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema k tarifni številki 9018).
While this kind of apparatus can be used by non-professionals, it is of a kind used for medical purposes as it provides information concerning ‘vital body functions’ that may need to be further analysed by professionals.
Čeprav lahko ta aparat uporabljajo tudi nezdravstveni delavci, gre za vrsto naprave, ki se uporablja v medicinske namene, saj zagotavlja informacije o „vitalnih telesih funkcijah“, ki jih bodo morda morali podrobneje analizirati zdravstveni delavci.
Classification under heading 9027 as instruments and apparatus for physical or chemical analysis using optical radiation is consequently excluded.
Uvrstitev pod tarifno številko 9027 kot instrumenti in aparati za fizikalne ali kemične analize na podlagi optičnega sevanja je zato izključena.
It is therefore to be classified under CN code 90181910 as instruments and apparatus used in medical science, monitoring apparatus for simultaneous monitoring of two or more parameters.
Aparat je zato treba uvrstiti pod oznako KN 90181910 kot medicinski instrumenti in aparati, aparati za hkratno opazovanje dveh ali več parametrov.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1171
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1171
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of melamine originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz melamina s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Following an anti-dumping investigation (‘the original investigation’), the Council imposed, by means of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 457/2011 [2], a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of melamine originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or ‘China’ or ‘country concerned’).
Svet je po protidampinški preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 457/2011 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz melamina s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK, Kitajska ali zadevna država“).
The measures took the form of a fixed duty of 415 EUR/tonne on all imports from the PRC with the exception of three cooperating Chinese exporting producers that were granted a minimum import price (‘MIP’) of 1153 EUR/tonne.
Ukrepi so bili v obliki fiksne dajatve v višini 415 EUR/tono za ves uvoz iz LRK z izjemo treh sodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, katerim je bila odobrena minimalna uvozna cena v višini 1153 EUR/tono.
Following the publication of the notice of impending expiry [3] of the anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an expiry review of the measures in force pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 [4].
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [3] veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov je Komisija prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 [4].
Three Union producers lodged this request: Borealis Agrolinz Melamine GmbH, OCI Nitrogen BV and Grupa Azoty Zaklady Azotow Pulawy SA (‘the applicants’).
Ta zahtevek so vložili trije proizvajalci iz Unije: Borealis Agrolinz Melamine GmbH, OCI Nitrogen BV in Grupa Azoty Zaklady Azotow Pulawy SA („vložniki“).
They represented more than 50 % of the total Union production of melamine in 2015.
Ti proizvajalci so proizvedli več kot 50 % vsega melamina v Uniji v letu 2015.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures in force would in all likelihood result in the recurrence of dumping and in the recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je temeljil na izhodišču, da bi iztek veljavnih ukrepov verjetno povzročil ponovitev dampinga in škode za industrijo Unije.
Having determined that sufficient evidence existed, the Commission announced on 11 May 2016, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5] (‘Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.
Komisija je ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi in zato je 11. maja 2016 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009.
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava v zvezi z verjetnostjo nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2015 do 31. marca 2016 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ali OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2012 to the end of the review investigation period (the ‘period considered’).
Preučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2012 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The Commission advised the applicants, other known Union producers, exporting producers in the PRC, known importers and traders and their associations, users known to be concerned and the representatives of the exporting country of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa obvestila vložnike, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike iz LRK, znane uvoznike ter trgovce in njihova združenja, uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike držav izvoznic.
The Commission services granted one interested party, namely China Council for the Promotion of International Trade (‘CCPIT’) a hearing at the initial stage of the procedure.
Službe Komisije so eni zainteresirani strani, in sicer Kitajskemu svetu za spodbujanje mednarodne trgovine („CCPIT“), odobrile zaslišanje v začetni fazi postopka.
Another hearing occurred with the Hearing Officer with the same interested party after definitive disclosure on 4 May 2017.
Na drugem zaslišanju z isto zainteresirano stranjo je sodeloval pooblaščenec za zaslišanje in je potekalo po dokončnem razkritju 4. maja 2017.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, intended to sample interested parties in case a significant number of them came forward.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo izvedla vzorčenje zainteresiranih strani v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe, če se bo javilo precejšnje število zainteresiranih strani.
In addition, it asked the mission of the PRC to the Union to identify and/or contact other Chinese exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Poleg tega je pozvala predstavništvo LRK pri Uniji, naj navede morebitne druge kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki bi jih zanimalo sodelovanje v preiskavi, in/ali vzpostavi stik z njimi.
No exporting producers in the PRC came forward with a response to the sampling form or decided to cooperate in the expiry review.
Noben proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK ni odgovoril na obrazec za vzorčenje ali se odločil za sodelovanje v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa.
Therefore, there was no sampling of Chinese exporting producers in this procedure.
Zato se v tem postopku ni izvedlo vzorčenje kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Three Union producers, that were also the applicants, provided a reply to the standing forms while the two other Union producers did not cooperate in the investigation.
Trije proizvajalci Unije ki so tudi vložniki, so predložili odgovor na uveljavljene obrazce, medtem ko druga dva proizvajalca Unije nista sodelovala v preiskavi.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the sample on the basis of the largest representative volume of sales and production of melamine.
V skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe je Komisija izbrala vzorec na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega prodaje in proizvodnje melamina.
The provisional sample consisted of the three cooperating Union producers.
Začasni vzorec je vključeval tri sodelujoče proizvajalce Unije.
The Commission invited interested parties to comment on the provisional sample.
Vzorec se je štel za reprezentativnega za industrijo Unije.
No comments were received within the deadline and the provisional sample was thus confirmed.
Vzorčenje nepovezanih uvoznikov
The sample was considered representative of the Union industry.
Za odločitev, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrali vzorec, so bili vsi znani uvozniki/distributerji (skupaj jih je petnajst) pozvani, naj izpolnijo obrazec za vzorčenje, priložen obvestilu o začetku.
Sampling of unrelated importers
Obrazec za vzorčenje je izpolnil samo en izvoznik, zato se vzorčenje ni štelo za potrebno.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all known (in total 15) importers/distributors were invited to fill in the sampling form attached to the Notice of Initiation.
Vprašalniki in preveritveni obiski
Only one importer replied to the sampling form and therefore sampling was not considered necessary.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga, verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode ter za ugotovitev interesa Unije.
Questionnaires and verification visits
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike dvema proizvajalcema v primerljivi državi, trem vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, enemu nepovezanemu uvozniku in devetinšestdesetim znanim uporabnikom v Uniji.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the purpose of determining the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping, the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury and Union interest.
Izpolnjen vprašalnik so predložili dva potencialna proizvajalca iz primerljive države, trije vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, en nepovezan uvoznik in štirje uporabniki.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the two producers in the analogue country the three sampled Union producers, one unrelated importer and to 69 known users in the Union.
Komisija je izvedla preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Complete questionnaire replies were received from the two potential analogue country producers, the three sampled Union producers, one unrelated importer and four users.
proizvajalci Unije:
The Commission carried out verifications at the premises of the following companies:
Grupa Azoty Zaklady Azotowe Pulawy S.A, Poljska;
Union producers:
OCI Nitrogen BV, Nizozemska;
Grupa Azoty Zaklady Azotowe Pulawy SA, Poland,
Borealis Agrolinz Melmine GmbH, Avstrija;
OCI Nitrogen BV, the Netherlands,
uvozniki:
Borealis Agrolinz Melamine GmbH, Austria.
Globe Chemicals GmbH, Nemčija;
Importers:
uporabniki
Globe Chemicals GmbH, Germany.
Kočevje, Slovenija;
Users:
Tinde d.o.o, Slovenija;
Kocevje, Slovenia,
ChemCom B.V, Nizozemska;
Tinde d.o.o, Slovenia,
proizvajalec v primerljivi državi s tržnim gospodarstvom:
ChemCom BV, the Netherlands.
Nissan Chemical Industries Ltd., Japonska.
Producer in the market economy analogue country:
B. ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
Nissan Chemical Industries Ltd, Japan.
Zadevni izdelek
B. PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Zadevni izdelek je melamin, ki je trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN 29336100, s poreklom iz LRK.
Product concerned
Melamin je bel, kristaliničen prah, ki se večinoma proizvaja iz sečnine in se uporablja predvsem v laminatih, lepilih za les in zmeseh za oblikovanje ter za obdelavo papirja/tekstila.
The product concerned is melamine, currently falling within CN code 29336100 originating in the PRC.
Podobni izdelek
Melamine is a white crystalline powder produced predominantly from urea and is used mainly in laminates, wood adhesives, moulding compounds and paper/textile treatments.
V zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in melaminom, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Japonske, primerljive države, ter melaminom, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, je bilo ugotovljeno, da imata enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter uporabe.
Like product
Komisija je zato sklenila, da so si ti izdelki podobni v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The product concerned and melamine produced and sold on the domestic market of Japan, the analogue country, as well as melamine produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry were found to have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and uses.
C. VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
The Commission therefore concluded that these products are alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping iz LRK zaradi izteka veljavnih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
C. LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
Sodelovanje iz LRK
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the expiry of the measures in force would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping from the PRC.
Po začetku postopka pregleda so bili vsi znani kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki (71 podjetij ali skupin podjetij) povabljeni, da se javijo in izpolnijo obrazec za vzorčenje, priložen obvestilu o začetku.
Cooperation from the PRC
Vendar se ni nobeno kitajsko podjetje odzvalo na začetek postopa pregleda ali se odločilo za sodelovanje v kateri koli poznejši fazi postopka.
Upon the initiation of the review procedure all known Chinese exporting producers (71 companies or groups of companies) were invited to come forward and to provide replies to the sampling form attached to the Notice of Initiation.
Edini odziv Kitajske je bila vloga kitajskega sveta za spodbujanje mednarodne trgovine („CCPIT“), ki ji je pozneje sledilo zaslišanje.
However, no Chinese company reacted to the initiation of the review procedure or decided to cooperate at any further stage of the procedure.
Vložniki so ugovarjali statusu CCPIT kot zainteresirane strani.
The only reaction from China was a submission by the CCPIT, followed later by a hearing.
Trdili so, da CCPIT ni niti proizvajalec zadevnega izdelka niti združenje izvoznikov zadevnega izdelka in se zato njegova mnenja ne bi smela upoštevati.
The status of the CCPIT as an interested party was contested by the applicants.
CCPIT (znan tudi kot kitajska zbornica za mednarodno trgovino ali CCOIC) vključuje med drugim podjetja in organizacije, ki predstavljajo gospodarske in trgovinske sektorje na Kitajskem.
The applicants in their submission claimed that CCPIT is neither an exporter of the product concerned nor an association of such exporters and thus their comments should be disregarded in their entirety.
Zato se lahko šteje za združenje izvoznikov, vključno z izvozniki zadevnega izdelka.
The CCPIT (also known as China Chamber of International Commerce (CCOIC)) comprises amongst others enterprises and organisations representing the economic and trade sectors in China.
Po dokončnem razkritju je CCPIT potrdil, da je med člani zbornice devet proizvajalcev melamina.
It can be thus also treated as an association of exporters, including exporters of the product concerned.
Poleg tega v skladu s statutom zbornice odgovornosti CCPIT vključujejo organizacijo, pomoč ali ukrepanje v imenu kitajskih podjetij in posameznikov v postopkih v tretjih državah, kot je protidampinški postopek.
After definitive disclosure CCPIT has confirmed the presence of 9 melamine producers among the Chamber's members.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenega CCPIT obravnavala kot zainteresirano stranko, tako kot v prejšnjih protidampinških postopkih [6].
Furthermore, according to its Articles of Association, the responsibilities of CCPIT include organising, assisting or acting on behalf of Chinese enterprises and individuals in third countries procedures such as anti-dumping.
Damping v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
Taking into account the above, the Commission treated CCPIT as an interested party as in previous anti-dumping proceedings [6].
Primerljiva država
Dumping during the review investigation period
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je treba normalno vrednost določiti na podlagi cen, ki so se plačevale ali se plačujejo na domačem trgu, ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerni tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“).
Analogue country
V prvotni preiskavi je Komisija za primerljivo državo izbrala Indonezijo.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value has to be determined on the basis of the prices paid or payable on the domestic market or the constructed value in an appropriate market economy third country (the ‘analogue country’).
Vendar je bil proizvodni obrat indonezijskega proizvajalca leta 2011 zaprt.
In the original investigation, the Commission chose Indonesia as an analogue country.
Ker je bilo zadevno podjetje edini proizvajalec melamina v Indoneziji, te države ni bilo več mogoče šteti za možno primerljivo državo.
However, in 2011, the production facility of the cooperating Indonesian producer was closed.
Vložniki so v zahtevku predlagali, da se kot primerljiva država uporabijo ZDA.
As the company in question was the only producer of melamine in Indonesia, this country could not be further taken into account as a potential analogue country.
Posledično so vložniki za predhoden izračun stopnje dampinga v svojem zahtevku uporabili konstruirano normalno vrednost na ameriškem trgu.
In their request, the applicants proposed using the USA as an analogue country.
Vendar se je Komisija glede na to, da je v ZDA samo en domač proizvajalec melamina, ki je trenutno zaščiten z zelo visoko stopnjo protidampinških in izravnalnih ukrepov, odločila, da poišče drugo primerljivo državo, kljub temu, da je bil proizvajalec ZDA pripravljen sodelovati in je odgovoril na vprašalnik.
Consequently, the applicants used constructed normal value from the US market for the preliminary calculation of the dumping margin in their request.
V obvestilu o začetku je bilo omenjeno, da bi se kot možne primerljive države lahko uporabile tudi druge države, ki proizvajajo melamin, in sicer Indija, Iran, Japonska, Katar, Rusija ter Trinidad in Tobago.
However, taking into account that there is only one domestic producer of melamine in the USA, currently protected by a very high level of anti-dumping and countervailing measures, the Commission decided to look for an alternative analogue country despite the fact that the US producer was willing to cooperate and replied to the questionnaire.
Po začetku sedanjega postopka pregleda je Komisija stopila v stik z osmimi podjetji, ki se nahajajo v teh državah.
The Notice of Initiation envisaged also the use of other countries producing melamine as a potential analogue country, namely India, Iran, Japan, Qatar, Russia and Trinidad & Tobago.
Samo eno podjetje, japonski Nissan Chemical Industries Ltd., je bilo pripravljeno sodelovati kot proizvajalec primerljive države in je odgovorilo na vprašalnik, ki se je nato preveril na mestu samem.
Following the initiation of the current review procedure the Commission contacted eight companies located in those countries.
Po dokončnem razkritju je CCPIT trdil, da v javno dostopni dokumentaciji ni bilo mogoče najti nobenih dokazov o stikih z drugim japonskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom zadevnega proizvoda, ter zato CCPIT ni mogel preveriti, ali je zadevno japonsko podjetje resnično zavrnilo sodelovanje v postopku.
Only one company, the Japanese Nissan Chemical Industries Ltd, agreed to cooperate as an analogue country producer and replied to the questionnaire which was subsequently verified on spot.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija pojasnila, da je vsaj dvakrat stopila v stik z vsemi potencialnimi proizvajalci iz primerljivih držav (15. julija in 16. septembra 2016) ter je vsakemu izmed njih poslala neizpolnjen vprašalnik.
Following definitive disclosure CCPIT claimed that no contact record with the second Japanese exporting producer of the product concerned could be found in the open file and therefore CCPIT was not able to verify whether the Japanese company in question indeed had refused to cooperate in the procedure.
Vendar to dopisovanje iz javno dostopne dokumentaciji ni bilo razvidno, prav tako niso bili zadevni elektronski naslovi razkriti drugim proizvajalcem [7], saj so ti med seboj konkurenčni.
In this regard, the Commission explained that all potential analogue countries' producers were contacted by the Commission at least twice (15 July and 16 September 2016) and a blank copy of the questionnaire was sent to each of them.
Potrjeno je, da noben odgovor ni bil prejet od drugega japonskega proizvajalca zadevnega proizvoda.
The correspondence was not however shown in the open file, nor were the addressees of the emails in question revealed to each other [7] as these producers are competitors.
Komisija meni, da se Japonska lahko šteje za primerno primerljivo državo glede na velikost njenega domačega trga in stopnjo konkurence na tem trgu.
It is confirmed that no reply was received from the second Japanese producer of the product concerned.
Na Japonskem delujeta dva domača proizvajalca, precejšen delež trga pa pokriva tudi uvoz (po ocenah 12 %).
The Commission considered Japan as a proper analogue country taking into account the size of its domestic market and the level of the competition thereon.
Oba japonska proizvajalca svoje izdelke tudi izvažata, tako da morata biti mednarodno konkurenčna tako glede stroškov kot cen.
There are two domestic producers in Japan and a substantial share of the market is also held by imports (estimated at 12 %).
Država ni zaščitena z visokimi carinskimi dajatvami.
Both Japanese producers are also engaged in exports so they must be able to compete internationally with their costs and prices.
Znašajo do 3,1 % za članice STO, vendar 0 % v okviru ureditve splošnega sistema preferencialov, ki velja tudi za LRK – glavno izvoznico na japonski trg.
The country is not protected by high custom duties.
Trenutno se tudi ne izvajajo nobeni ukrepi trgovinske zaščite.
They amount to 3,1 % for WTO members but 0 % under the GSP regime which applies also to the PRC — the main exporter to the Japanese market.
Komisija je glede na navedeno sklenila, da je Japonska primerna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Also no trade defence measures currently apply.
Komisija je to trditev zavrnila.