natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In summary, the applicant contested the Commission's preliminary conclusion that injury was unlikely to recur if measures were allowed to lapse.
Ta zainteresirana stran je zahtevala tudi posredovanje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih („pooblaščenec za zaslišanje“) in po tem zaslišanju predložila dodatne informacije.
Instead, it claimed that the expected increased imports would lead to a recurrence of material injury.
Po temeljiti analizi informacij, ki jih je imela na voljo, in informacij, predloženih po razkritju, je Komisija prilagodila svoje ugotovitve.
This party also requested the intervention by the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings (‘the Hearing Officer’) and it submitted additional information after that hearing.
V fazi razkritja je menila, da se škoda v primeru izteka ukrepov najverjetneje ne bi ponovila.
After a thorough analysis of information available to the Commission as well as information submitted subsequent to the disclosure, the Commission adjusted its findings.
Vendar se je po upoštevanju informacij, predloženih po razkritju, strinjala s trditvijo vložnika, da se je kakovost kitajskega izdelka zvišala na raven, enakovredno ravni industrije Unije.
At the stage of the disclosure, the Commission was of the view that injury was unlikely to recur, if measures were allowed to lapse.
Ta ključna ugotovitev je privedla do ugotovitve nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen in opozorila na precej drugačen vidik analize verjetnosti ponovitve škode.
However, after taking into account the information submitted after the disclosure, the Commission accepted the applicant's claim that the quality of the Chinese product had evolved to a level equivalent to that of the Union industry.
Zato je Komisija 6. septembra 2017 vse strani obvestila o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („dodatno razkritje“).
That key determination resulted in the finding of undercutting and shed a markedly different light on the likelihood of recurrence of injury analysis.
Po dodatnem razkritju je Komisija prejela pripombe različnih strani.
Consequently, on 6 September 2017, the Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the additional disclosure’).
Kitajski proizvajalci so predložili pisno stališče glede ugotovitev Komisije in njene splošne ocene.
After additional disclosure, the Commission received comments from different parties.
Prvič, kitajski proizvajalci so trdili, da je Komisija domnevno spremenila metodologijo, uporabljeno v prvotni preiskavi, tako da v svojih izračunih nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen v tem primeru ni uporabila prilagoditve kakovosti (glej uvodno izjavo 97).
The Chinese producers made a written submission making their views known on the Commission's findings and overall assessment.
Ker bi ta domnevna sprememba privedla do drugačnega sklepa glede verjetnosti ponovitve škode v primeru izteka ukrepov proti LRK, so kitajski proizvajalci izpodbijali ta sklep.
First, the Chinese producers claimed that the Commission would have allegedly changed the methodology used in the original investigation by not applying the quality adjustment in its undercutting calculations in the present case (see recital 97 below).
Poleg tega so nadalje navedli, da dodatno razkritje ni vsebovalo številnih elementov, ki so obstajali pri prvem razkritju.
As this alleged change would result in a different conclusion concerning the likelihood of recurrence of injury if the measures against the PRC were allowed to lapse, the Chinese producers contested that conclusion.
Trdili so tudi, da Komisija ne sme več uporabljati metodologije primerljive države, saj naj bi v primerjavi s prvotno preiskavo spremenila metodologijo, uporabljeno za določitev normalne vrednosti.
In addition, they further noted that the additional disclosure did not contain a number of elements that were present in the first disclosure.
Vložnik je izrazil svoja stališča, pri čemer je trdil, da bi bilo treba o začetku vmesnega pregleda, ki ga je Komisija predlagala v dodatnem razkritju, razmišljati samo, če bi kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki predložili ustrezno utemeljen zahtevek za tak pregled.
Finally, they claimed that the Commission was no longer permitted to use the analogue country methodology since it anyway had allegedly changed the methodology used for the determination of the normal value as compared to the original investigation.
V zvezi s tem Komisija poudarja, da bi lahko razmislila o tem, ali bi bilo primerno začeti vmesni pregled po uradni dolžnosti, da bi lahko nazadnje podrobno določila vpliv vprašanja v zvezi s kakovostjo na izvozne cene zadevnega izdelka ter s tem na damping in stopnje škode, pa tudi na položaj obeh skupin proizvajalcev (vertikalno integriranih in drugih proizvajalcev, imenovanih tudi „tkalci“, glej uvodno izjavo 117), s čimer bi zagotovila, da kazalniki uspešnosti za te proizvajalce niso izkrivljeni zaradi prevlade ene skupine v vzorcu nad drugo.
The applicant made known its views claiming that opening an interim review, as suggested by the Commission in the additional disclosure, should be considered only if the Chinese exporting producers submit a properly reasoned request for such a review.
Kitajski organi so med zaslišanjem pred službami Komisije po dodatnem razkritju tudi podali izjavo, v kateri so trdili, da bi bilo treba ohraniti prilagoditev iz uvodne izjave 97.
In this respect, the Commission points out that it could consider whether it would be appropriate to initiate, ex officio, an interim review, to eventually determine the impact of the quality issue on export prices of the product concerned, and, therefore, on the dumping and injury margins, as well as the situation of the two groups of producers (the vertically-integrated and the other producers, also referred to as ‘weavers’, see recital 117) in detail with a view to ensuring that the performance indicators for these producers are not distorted by the dominance in the sample of one group over the other.
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani so se proučile in upoštevale, kjer je bilo primerno.
In a hearing with the Commission's services after the additional disclosure, the Chinese authorities also made a statement claiming that the adjustment referred to in recital 97 below should be maintained.
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Zadevni izdelek so nekatere tkanine z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken z velikostjo celice več kot 1,8 mm po dolžini in širini ter težo več kot 35 g/m2, razen diskov iz steklenih vlaken, s poreklom iz LRK („izdelek, ki se pregleduje“), ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex70195100 in ex70195900 (oznaki TARIC 7019510019 in 7019590019).
Product concerned
Tkanine z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken so na voljo v različnih velikostih celice in težah na kvadratni meter, večinoma pa se uporabljajo kot ojačitveni material v gradbeništvu (zunanja toplotna izolacija, ojačitev tal in popravilo zidov).
The product concerned is certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres, of a cell size of more than 1,8 mm both in length and in width and weighing more than 35 g/m2, excluding fibreglass discs, and originating in the PRC (‘the product under review’), currently falling within CN codes ex70195100 and ex70195900 (TARIC codes 7019510019 and 7019590019).
Podobni izdelek
Open mesh fabrics of glass fibres can be found in different cell sizes and weight per square metre and are mostly used as reinforcement material in the construction sector (external thermal insulation, floor reinforcement, and wall repair).
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo naslednji izdelki enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe:
The investigation showed that the following products have the same basic physical and technical characteristics, as well as the same basic uses:
izdelek, ki ga izbrani proizvajalec proizvaja in prodaja v Kanadi, tj. v primerljivi državi, in
the product concerned,
izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije.
the product produced and sold by the selected producer in Canada, which served as an analogue country,
Komisija je sklenila, da so ti izdelki podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry.
VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
The Commission concluded that these products were like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Uvodne opombe
LIKELIHOOD OF A CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
Komisija je v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping iz LRK zaradi izteka obstoječih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
Preliminary remarks
V preiskavi ni sodeloval noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping from the PRC.
Zaradi njihovega nesodelovanja je splošna analiza, vključno z izračunom dampinga, v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe temeljila na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
No Chinese exporting producer cooperated with the investigation.
Zato je bila verjetnost nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga ocenjena na podlagi zahtevka za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v povezavi z drugimi viri informacij, kot so trgovinski statistični podatki o uvozu in izvozu (Eurostat in kitajski podatki o izvozu), odgovor proizvajalca iz primerljive države in pripombe, ki so jih predložili kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, pa tudi dokazi, ki jih je predložil vložnik.
In the absence of cooperation from exporting producers in the PRC, the overall analysis, including the dumping calculation, was based on facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Damping uvoza v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
Therefore, the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping was assessed by using the expiry review request, combined with other sources of information, such as trade statistics on imports and exports (Eurostat and Chinese export data), the reply from the analogue country producer and the comments submitted by the Chinese exporting producers, as well evidence submitted by the applicant.
Primerljiva država
Dumping of imports during the review investigation period
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da namerava kot morebitno primerljivo državo uporabiti Kanado, in jih pozvala k predložitvi pripomb.
Analogue country
Kanada je bila kot ustrezna primerljiva država uporabljena tudi pri prvotni preiskavi.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged Canada as possible analogue country and invited parties to comment.
V obvestilu o začetku so bili kot druge možne primerljive države navedeni Bangladeš, Indija, Indonezija, Moldavija, Filipini, Tajvan, Tajska in Turčija.
Canada was used in the original investigation as an appropriate analogue country.
Vsem znanim dejanskim proizvajalcem nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken v Bangladešu, Indiji, na Filipinih in v Turčiji je bil poslan dopis, v katerem so bili povabljeni k sodelovanju pri pregledu, priložen pa je bil tudi vprašalnik za primerljive države.
Other potential analogue countries mentioned in the Notice of Initiation were: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Moldova, Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey.
V državah, v katerih proizvajalci niso bili znani, so se informacije o proizvajalcih zahtevale od nacionalnih organov.
Letters were sent to all known genuine producers of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres in Bangladesh, India, Philippines and Turkey, asking for their cooperation with the review and enclosing an analogue country questionnaire.
Odgovor sta predložila dva dejanska proizvajalca iz Indije.
In countries where no producers were known, information about producers was requested from the national authorities.
Sodelovali so le en kanadski proizvajalec in dva dejanska proizvajalca iz Indije.
Replies were received from two genuine producers in India.
Izbira primerljive države
Cooperation was received only from one Canadian producer and from the two genuine producers from India.
Kar zadeva izbiro med Indijo in Kanado, je Komisija Kanado izbrala iz naslednjih razlogov: (i) kot je bilo navedeno, je bila Kanada primerljiva država v prvotni preiskavi; (ii) obseg proizvodnje sodelujočega kanadskega proizvajalca (med 20 in 30 milijoni kvadratnih metrov) je bil primerljiv z obsegom proizvodnje vzorčenih (največjih) kitajskih proizvajalcev v prvotni preiskavi (obseg proizvodnje med 23 in 59 milijoni kvadratnih metrov).
Choice of analogue country
Zato je bilo verjetno, da sta struktura stroškov in ekonomija obsega v Kanadi primerljivejši s kitajskimi proizvajalci.
As regards the choice between India and Canada, the Commission selected Canada on the following grounds: (i) as mentioned above, Canada was the analogue country in the initial investigation; (ii) the production volume of the cooperating Canadian producer (between 20 million and 30 million square metres) was comparable to the production volumes of the sampled (largest) Chinese producers in the original investigation (production volumes between 23 million and 59 million square metres).
Kljub nesodelovanju kitajskih izvoznikov v tem primeru ni razloga za domnevo, da to več ne velja.
The cost structure and economies of scale in Canada were therefore likely to be more comparable with the Chinese producers.
Nasprotno sta bila indijska proizvajalca manjša (proizvodnja med 1 in 5 milijoni kvadratnih metrov), zato njuni struktura stroškov in ekonomija obsega nista bili primerljivi s kitajskimi proizvajalci; (iii) domača prodaja kanadskega proizvajalca je bila večja od domače prodaje obeh sodelujočih indijskih proizvajalcev skupaj, zato je reprezentativnejša podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Despite the lack of cooperation from Chinese exporters in this case, there is no reason to believe that this is does no longer apply.
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani o izbiri primerljive države
By contrast, the two Indian producers were smaller (production between 1 and 5 million square metres), and were therefore not comparable to the Chinese producers in terms of cost structure and economies of scale; (iii) the domestic sales of the Canadian producer were larger than the domestic sales of both cooperating Indian producers, taken together, and provided therefore a more representative basis for establishing normal value.
Kitajski proizvajalci so v prvem sklopu trditev navedli, da Komisiji po njihovem mnenju ne bi smelo biti več dovoljeno uporabljati metodologije primerljive države.
Comments from interested parties on the choice of the analogue country
Če pa bi se ta metodologija ne glede na to uporabila, so v drugem sklopu trditev nasprotovali izbiri Kanade in zahtevali, naj se uporabi druga primerljiva država, in sicer iz naslednjih razlogov: (i) ugotovitve na podlagi enega samega proizvajalca bi bile izkrivljene; (ii) edini kanadski proizvajalec je bil povezan z enim od proizvajalcev Unije, ki so se pritožili, zato bi lahko kanadski subjekt zaradi prihodnjega pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, za katerega bo zahtevo vložila njegova matična družba, sprejel posebne cenovne ali stroškovne politike; (iii) obstajala je nesorazmernost informacij, saj je imel vložnik dostop do zaupnih podatkov, ki jih bo predložil njegov povezani proizvajalec iz primerljive države, kitajski proizvajalci pa ne.
The Chinese producers commented, by way of first line of argument that the Commission was in their opinion no longer permitted to use the analogue country methodology.
Kar zadeva prvi sklop trditev v zvezi z uporabo metodologije primerljive države, Komisija poudarja, da so imeli vsi kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki možnost predložiti obrazce zahtevkov za TGO (tržnogospodarsko obravnavo), da bi se omogočili posamezni izračuni stopenj dampinga.
In case this methodology was nevertheless used, and by way of second line of argument, they opposed the choice of Canada and requested a different analogue country for the following reasons: (i) findings based on one single producer would be distorted; (ii) the sole Canadian producer was related to one of the complaining Union producers, and so the Canadian entity may have adopted specific pricing or costing policies in view of the upcoming expiry review to be lodged by its mother company; (iii) there was information asymmetry, as the applicant had access to the confidential data to be submitted by its related analogue country producer, whereas the Chinese producers had not.
Nobeden od teh izvoznikov ni izkoristil te možnosti.
In relation to the first line of arguments, regarding the use of the analogue country methodology, the Commission points out that all Chinese exporting producers had the opportunity to submit MET (Market Economy Treatment) claim forms to enable individual calculations of dumping margins.
Zato je bila v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost določena na podlagi podatkov iz primerljive države.
None of these exporters made use of that possibility.
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
Therefore, pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, normal value was determined on the basis of data from an analogue country.
Kar zadeva drugi sklop trditev v zvezi z izbiro Kanade, Komisija poudarja, da sta bila Kanada in isti kanadski proizvajalec uporabljena kot primerljiva država oziroma proizvajalec iz primerljive države že v prvotni preiskavi.
This argument was, thus, rejected.
Ker proizvajalci izvozniki niso utemeljili nobene od svojih trditev zoper izbiro Kanade, je Komisija menila, da je izbira Kanade še vedno ustrezna.
In relation to the second line of arguments, regarding the choice of Canada, the Commission points out that Canada, and the same Canadian producer, was already used as the analogue country and the analogue country producer in the original investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 40, je Kanada vsekakor ustreznejša z vidika obsega proizvodnje in domače prodaje, tj. obeh dejavnikov, na podlagi katerih se določi normalna vrednost.
Given the fact that the exporting producers did not substantiate any of their claims against the choice of Canada, the Commission considered that the choice of Canada was still appropriate.
Nazadnje, s pravnega vidika ni ovir za izbiro primerljive države z enim samim sodelujočim proizvajalcem, četudi je navedeni proizvajalec povezan s proizvajalcem Unije.
Canada, as mentioned in recital 40 above, was, in any case, more appropriate in terms of volumes of production and domestic sales, both factors determining the establishment of normal value.
Komisija je vsekakor zagotovila, da so podatki, ki jih je predložil kanadski proizvajalec, zanesljivi.
Finally, there is no legal obstacle to the choice of an analogue country with a single cooperating producer, even if that producer is related to a Union producer.
Zato je zavrnila trditev proizvajalca izvoznika.
In any case, the Commission ensured that the data provided by the Canadian producer was reliable.
Po dodatnem razkritju so kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki ponovno trdili, da Komisiji ni več dovoljena uporaba metodologije primerljive države.
Therefore the Commission rejected the exporting producers' claim.
Trdili so, da je Komisija spremenila svojo metodo analize v zvezi z drugimi vidiki, zlasti v zvezi s prilagoditvijo kakovosti, in da bi morala zato spremeniti tudi svojo metodo analize, kar zadeva metodologijo primerljive države.
Following the additional disclosure, the Chinese exporting producers repeated their claim that the Commission was no longer permitted to use the analogue country methodology.
Komisija je ponovno zavrnila trditev.
They claimed that the Commission had changed its method of analysis in other respects, notably concerning the quality adjustment, and therefore the Commission should also have changed its method of analysis as regards the analogue country methodology.
Metodologija primerljive države je bila dovoljena zaradi razlogov iz uvodne izjave 42.
The Commission again rejected the claim.
Poleg tega Komisijina ocena prilagoditve kakovosti ni povezana z izbiro primerljive države.
The analogue country methodology was permissible for the reasons outlined in recital 42 above.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da je Kanada tako kot pri prvotni preiskavi ustrezna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Furthermore, the Commission's assessment of the quality adjustment is an issue not related to the choice of the analogue country.
Normalna vrednost
Consequently, the Commission concluded that, as in the original investigation, Canada is an appropriate analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Kot podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti so bile uporabljene informacije, ki jih je zagotovil sodelujoči proizvajalec v primerljivi državi.
Normal value
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali je bil celoten obseg podobnega izdelka, ki ga je sodelujoči proizvajalec v Kanadi na domačem trgu prodal neodvisnim strankam, reprezentativen v primerjavi s celotnim obsegom izvoza iz LRK v Unijo, tj. ali je celoten obseg take domače prodaje predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
The information received from the cooperating producer in the analogue country was used as a basis for the determination of the normal value.
Na tej podlagi je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila domača prodaja v primerljivi državi reprezentativna.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales of the like product to independent customers made by the cooperating producer in Canada was representative in comparison with the total export volume from the PRC to the Union, namely whether the total volume of such domestic sales represented at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the product concerned to the Union.
Komisija je nato v zvezi s proizvajalcem iz primerljive države proučila, ali se lahko za vsako vrsto podobnega izdelka, ki je bila prodana na domačem trgu, šteje, da je bila prodana v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
On that basis, it was found that the domestic sales in the analogue country were representative.
Pri tem je bil za vsako vrsto izdelka določen delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu med obdobjem preiskave.
The Commission subsequently examined for the analogue country producer whether each type of the like product sold domestically could be considered as being sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Prodajne transakcije so se štele za dobičkonosne, če je bila cena na enoto enaka ali višja od proizvodnih stroškov.
This was done by establishing for each product type the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market during the investigation period.
Tako so se določili proizvodni stroški za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki ga je kanadski proizvajalec proizvedel v obdobju preiskave.
The cost of production of each product type produced by the Canadian producer during the investigation period was therefore determined.
Ta cena je bila izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje navedene vrste izdelka v obdobju preiskave.