natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, the web page of the allegedly unrelated importer refers to its production site in Asia.
Spletni kontaktni naslov vodje prodaje AE Solar se samodejno poveže na spletno stran domnevno nepovezanega uvoznika v Unijo, kar kaže, da je ta stranka povezana z AE Solar, kot je določeno v členu 127(1)(a) Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2447 [32] („izvedbeni akt carinskega zakonika Unije“).
The web contact of AE Solar's sales manager automatically transfers to the website of the allegedly unrelated importer in the Union, hence suggesting this party being related to AE Solar under Article 127(1)(a) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 [32] (‘Union Customs Code Implementing Act’).
Poleg tega je AE Solar v svojem četrtletnem poročilu uporabil številko stranke, dodeljeno zgoraj navedenemu domnevno nepovezanemu uvozniku, za poročanje o prodaji drugi stranki v Uniji, zaradi česar se pojavlja dvom o pravilnosti poročil iz uvodne izjave 30.
In addition, in its quarterly reports, AE Solar used the customer number allocated to the above allegedly unrelated importer to report sales to a different customer in the Union, hence putting into question the correctness of the reports as referred to in recital 30.
Poleg tega javno dostopne informacije kažejo, da je ta slednja stranka v Uniji tudi povezana stranka AE Solar.
In addition, publicly available information suggests this latter customer in the Union being a related party of AE Solar too.
Ime kontaktne osebe za prodajo te stranke v Uniji je enako imenu vodje prodaje AE Solar, torej je ta oseba povezana z AE Solar v skladu s členom 127(1)(a) izvedbenega akta carinskega zakonika Unije.
The name of the sales contact of this customer in the Union is identical with the sales manager of AE Solar, hence related to AE Solar under Article 127(1)(a) of the Union Customs Code Implementing Act.
Ker nobeden izmed teh uvoznikov ni naveden kot povezana stranka, je družba AE Solar kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so opisani v uvodnih izjavah 28 do 30.
As none of these importers are listed as a related party in the undertaking, AE Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 28 to 30.
Komisija ni bila obveščena o nobeni nadaljnji prodaji s strani povezanega uvoznika.
Consequently, AE Solar also breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 31 and 32.
Na podlagi dokazov, ki so jih predložili carinski organi, je družba Wuxi Saijing vzpostavila sistem trgovanja z enim nepovezanim uvoznikom, da bi po začetku veljavnosti zaveze prodajala sončne module pod minimalno uvozno ceno.
Wuxi Saijing
Družba Wuxi Saijing je tej stranki izdala račune na podlagi zaveze, pri čemer je upoštevala minimalno uvozno ceno, stranka pa je družbi Wuxi Saijing za te transakcije najprej plačala dolgovano nominalno vrednost.
Based on the evidence received from customs authorities, Wuxi Saijing had set up a trading system with one unrelated importer to sell solar modules below the MIP since the entry into force of the undertaking.
Vendar sta družba Wuxi Saijing in njena nepovezana stranka iz uvodne izjave 39 vodili vzporedno evidenco prodaje, v kateri sta beležili razliko med nominalno vrednostjo cen na računu na podlagi zaveze in dejanskimi prodajnimi cenami, pri čemer so bile slednje sistematično nižje od minimalne uvozne cene.
Wuxi Saijing issued undertaking invoices respecting the MIP to this customer and the customer first paid the face value due for these transactions to Wuxi Saijing.
Družba Wuxi Saijing je svoji nepovezani stranki plačala za nadomestilo za razliko med nominalno vrednostjo in dejansko prodajo tako, da je plačala zasebne račune.
However, Wuxi Saijing and its unrelated customer referred to in recital 39 kept a parallel sales record tracking the difference between the face value of the undertaking invoice prices and the actual sales prices, which latter were systematically below the MIP.
Takšen vzorec predstavlja kršitev zaveze iz uvodnih izjav 28 in 30.
Wuxi Saijing compensated its unrelated customer for the difference between the face value and the actual sales price by payments of private invoices.
Družba Wuxi Saijing je prav tako kršila svojo obveznost poročanja, kot je opisana v uvodni izjavi 31, s tem da ni poročala zgoraj navedenih ugodnosti, ki jih je odobrila svoji nepovezani stranki.
Such pattern constitutes a breach of the undertaking as referred in recitals 28 and 30.
Poleg tega je na podlagi dokazov, prejetih od carinskih organov, družba Wuxi Saijing izdala več računov na podlagi zaveze za module, ki so jim bili priključeni t. i. optimizatorji.
Wuxi Saijing also breached its reporting obligation as described in recital 31 by not reporting the above benefits granted to its unrelated customer.
Ti izdelki so uvrščeni pod oznako KN ex85013100 in jih zaveza ne zajema.
Finally, based on the evidence received from customs authorities, Wuxi Saijing issued several undertaking invoices for modules to which so-called optimisers were attached.
Družba Wuxi Saijing je te izdelke deklarirala kot sončne panele pod oznako KN ex85414090 in je zanje pridobila potrdila o izvozni zavezi.
These products are classifiable under CN code ex85013100 and are not covered by the undertaking.
Takšna praksa prav tako pomeni kršitev zaveze, kot je opisana v uvodni izjavi 30, saj so bile značilnosti izdelka opisane zavajajoče.
Wuxi Saijing had declared these products as solar panels under CN code ex85414090 and had obtained export undertaking certificates for these products.
E. RAZVELJAVITEV RAČUNOV NA PODLAGI ZAVEZE
Such practise also constitutes a breach of the undertaking as described in recital 30 as the characteristics of the products were misleadingly described.
Posredne prodajne transakcije, ki jih je izvršila družba AE Solar, so povezane z naslednjimi računi na podlagi zaveze:
E. INVALIDATION OF UNDERTAKING INVOICES
Številka trgovinskega računa, priloženega blagu, ki je predmet zaveze
The indirect sales transactions made by AE Solar are linked to the following undertaking invoices:
Datum
Number of Commercial invoice accompanying goods subject to an undertaking
Prodajne transakcije, ki jih je družba Wuxi Saijing izvršila nepovezani stranki, iz uvodne izjave 39 so povezane z naslednjimi računi na podlagi zavez:
Date
Zato se v skladu s členom 3(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 ti računi razglasijo za neveljavne.
The sales transactions made by Wuxi Saijing to the unrelated customer referred to in recitals 39 are linked to the following undertaking invoices:
Carinski dolg, ki je nastal ob sprejetju deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet, bi morali nacionalni carinski organi v skladu s členom 105(3) do (6) Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [33] izterjati ob začetku veljavnosti umika zaveze za zadevna proizvajalca izvoznika.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 3(2)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and Article 2(2)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, these invoices are declared invalid.
Nacionalni carinski organi, ki so pristojni za pobiranje dajatev, bodo o tem ustrezno obveščeni.
The customs debt incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation should be recovered by the national customs authorities under Article 105(3)-(6) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [33] when the withdrawal of the undertaking in relation to the two exporting producers enters into force.
V tem okviru Komisija poudarja, da je v skladu s členom 3(1)(b) v povezavi s točko 7 Priloge III Izvedbene Uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, členom (2)(1)(b) v povezavi s točko 7 Priloge III Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/367 in členom 2(1)(b) v povezavi s točko 7 Priloge 2 Izvedbene Uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013, členom 2(2)(b) v povezavi s točko 7 Priloge 2 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/366, uvoz oproščen dajatev le, če so na računu navedeni cena in morebitni rabati za zajeti izdelek.
The national customs authorities responsible for the collection of duties will be informed accordingly.
Če ta pogoja nista izpolnjena, je treba dajatve plačati, čeprav Komisija ni razveljavila trgovinskega računa, priloženega blagu.
In this context, the Commission recalls that pursuant to Article 3(1)(b) read in conjunction with Annex III, point 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013, Article (2)(1)(b) read in conjunction with Annex III, point 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367 and to Article 2(1)(b) read in conjunction with Annex 2, point 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, Article 2(2)(b) read in conjunction with Annex 2, point 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366, imports are only exempted from duties if the invoice indicates the price and possible rebates for the product covered.
F. OCENA IZVEDLJIVOSTI CELOTNE ZAVEZE
Where those conditions are not complied with, duties are due, even where the commercial invoice accompanying the goods has not been invalidated by the Commission.
Zaveza določa, da kršitev s strani posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika ne privede samodejno do umika sprejetja zaveze za vse proizvajalce izvoznike.
F. ASSESSMENT OF PRACTICABILITY OF THE OVERALL UNDERTAKING
V takem primeru bi morala Komisija oceniti učinek te kršitve na izvedljivost zaveze z učinkom za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
The undertaking stipulates that a breach by an individual exporting producer does not automatically lead to the withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers.
Komisija je ustrezno ocenila vpliv kršitev s strani družb AE Solar in Wuxi Saijing na izvedljivost zaveze z učinkom za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
In such a case, the Commission should assess the impact of that particular breach on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
Odgovornost za kršitve se pripiše samo zadevnima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma.
The Commission accordingly assessed the impact of the breaches by AE Solar and Wuxi Saijing on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
S spremljanjem niso bile razkrite nobene sistematične kršitve s strani velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali CCCME.
The Commission therefore concluded that the overall functioning of the undertaking is not affected and that there are no grounds for withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
G. PISNA STALIŠČA IN ZASLIŠANJA
G. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS
Zainteresirane strani so imele priložnost, da izrazijo svoja stališča in predložijo pripombe v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
Interested parties were granted the opportunity to be heard and to comment pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Pripombe so predložili tako proizvajalci izvozniki kot dva uvoznika.
Both exporting producers and two importers submitted comments.
Domnevno nepovezan uvoznik v Unijo je v zvezi z AE Solar potrdil povezavo med obema podjetjema, vendar je zatrdil, da podjetje ni nikoli prodajalo modulov ali celic pod minimalno uvozno ceno prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji.
The Commission therefore rejects this argument.
Wuxi Saijing je trdil, da nepovezanemu uvozniku v Unijo ni nikoli plačal nadomestila, ter je predložil s tem povezano globalno izjavo revizorja.
In addition, the Commission notes that the invoices submitted by AE Solar do not prove that the MIP was respected for the above transactions as the resale invoices covered both solar panels and other products.
Komisija ne more sprejeti te globalne izjave, ki ne vsebuje dodatnih dokazov o pomanjkanju nadomestila nepovezanemu uvozniku, zlasti ne za izpodbijanje argumentov in dokazov o nadomestilu, razkritem podjetju Wuxi Saijing.
Wuxi Saijing submitted that it had never compensated the unrelated importer in the Union and submitted a corresponding global statement by an auditor.
Komisija zato zavrača ta argument.
The Commission cannot accept this global statement which does not contain any further evidence on the lack of compensation to the unrelated importer, in particular to refute the arguments and evidence on the compensation disclosed to Wuxi Saijing.
Tako Wuxi Saijing kot nepovezan uvoznik v Unijo sta trdila, da bi bilo treba izdelke iz uvodne izjave 42 razvrstiti pod oznako KN ex85414090, ter sta se sklicevala na različne tehnične specifikacije.
The Commission therefore rejects the argument.
Komisija zavrača ta argument, ker se izdelki razvrstijo glede na deklaracijo izvoznika, zanjo pa so odgovorni nacionalni carinski organi, ki so izdelke razvrstili pod oznako KN ex85013100.
Both Wuxi Saijing and the unrelated importer in the Union submitted that the products referred to in recital 42 should be classified under CN code ex85414090 and referred to various technical specifications.
Vsako nesoglasje glede razvrstitve izdelka bi zato morali obravnavati nacionalni carinski organi neposredno.
The Commission rejects this argument as the classification of products is made following an importer's declaration and lies with the responsibility of national customs authorities who had classified the products under CN code ex85013100.
Nepovezan uvoznik Wuxi Saijing je zahteval dostop do zaupnih informacij, ki so bile razkrite podjetju Wuxi Saijing.
Any disagreement on the classification of the product should, accordingly, be addressed to the national customs authorities directly.
Komisija zavrača to zahtevo po razkritju, ker nepovezani uvoznik ni stranka v zavezi in ker razkritje vsebuje zaupne poslovne informacije podjetja Wuxi Saijing.
Wuxi Saijing's unrelated importer requested access to confidential information which had been disclosed to Wuxi Saijing.
H. UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZE IN DOLOČITEV DOKONČNIH DAJATEV
The Commission rejects this request for disclosure as the unrelated importer is not party to the undertaking and because the disclosure contains confidential business information of Wuxi Saijing.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe ter tudi v skladu s pogoji zaveze sklenila, da bi se moralo sprejetje zaveze za družbi AE Solar in Wuxi Saijing umakniti.
H. WITHDRAWAL OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING AND IMPOSITIONS OF DEFINITIVE DUTIES
V skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe se dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/367, in dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 in ki se ohranja s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/366, začneta samodejno uporabljati za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK ali ki je od tam poslan in ga proizvajata družbi AE Solar in Wuxi Saijing z dnem začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and also in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, the Commission concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking for AE Solar and Wuxi Saijing should be withdrawn.
Komisija poleg tega opozarja, da bi carinski organi morali preiskati, ali se je kršila zahteva, da se vsi rabati vključijo v račune na podlagi zaveze, ali se ni spoštovala minimalna uvozna cena, kadar po podatkih carinskih organov držav članic kaže, da cena na računu na podlagi zaveze ne ustreza dejansko plačani ceni.
Accordingly, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367 and the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 and maintained by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 automatically apply to imports originating in or consigned from the PRC of the product concerned and produced by AE Solar and Wuxi Saijing as of the day of entry into force of this Regulation.
Kadar carinski organi države članice ugotovijo, da je prišlo do take kršitve ali da se ni spoštovala minimalna uvozna cena, bi posledično morali pobrati dajatve.
The Commission also recalls that where the customs authorities of the Member States have indications that the price presented on an undertaking invoice does not correspond to the price actually paid, they should investigate whether the requirement to include any rebates in the undertaking invoices has been violated or the MIP has not been respected.
Da bi na podlagi člena 4(3) Pogodbe olajšali delo carinskih organov držav članic, bi Komisija morala v takih okoliščinah deliti zaupno besedilo in druge informacije o zavezi, in sicer izključno za namen nacionalnega postopka.
Where customs authorities of the Member States conclude that there has been such a violation or whether the MIP has not been respected, they should collect the duties as a consequence thereof.
V informativne namene so v tabeli v Prilogi II k tej uredbi navedeni proizvajalci izvozniki, za katere se ohrani sprejetje zaveze z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2013/707/EU –
In order to facilitate, on the basis of Article 4(3) of the Treaty, the work of the customs authorities of the Member States, the Commission should share in such situations the confidential text and other information of the undertaking for the sole purpose of national proceedings.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
For information purposes the table in the Annex II to this Regulation lists the exporting producers for whom the acceptance of the undertaking by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU is not affected,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Sprejetje zaveze v zvezi z naslednjimi družbami se umakne:
Article 1
Ime družbe
Acceptance of the undertaking in relation to the following companies is hereby withdrawn:
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
Name of the company
Člen 2
TARIC additional code
Računi na podlagi zaveze, našteti v Prilogi I k tej uredbi, se razglasijo za neveljavne.
Article 2
Protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve, dolgovane ob sprejetju carinske deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet v skladu s členom 3(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013, se poberejo.
The undertaking invoices listed in Annex I to this Regulation are declared invalid.
Člen 3
The anti-dumping and countervailing duties due at the time of acceptance of the customs declaration for release into free circulation under Article 3(2)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and Article 2(2)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 shall be collected.
Kadar po podatkih carinskih organov kaže, da cena na računu na podlagi zaveze, ki ga je v skladu s členom 3(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/367, členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 in členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/366 izdala ena od družb, katerih zaveza je bila prvotno sprejeta z Izvedbenim sklepom 2013/707/EU, ne ustreza plačani ceni in da so zato navedene družbe morebiti kršile zavezo, lahko carinski organi, če je to potrebno za izvajanje nacionalnega postopka, zahtevajo, da jim Komisija razkrije izvod zaveze in druge informacije, da preverijo veljavno minimalno uvozno ceno na dan, ko se je račun na podlagi zaveze izdal.
Article 3
Kadar preverjanje pokaže, da je plačana cena nižja od minimalne uvozne cene, se posledično poberejo dajatve, dolgovane v skladu s členom 8(9) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 in členom 13(9) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037.
Where customs authorities have indications that the price presented on an undertaking invoice pursuant to Article 3(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013, Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367, Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 and Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 issued by one of the companies from which the undertaking was initially accepted by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU does not correspond to the price paid and that therefore those companies may have violated the undertaking, the customs authorities may, if necessary for the purpose of conducting national proceedings, request the Commission to disclose to them a copy of the undertaking and other information in order to verify the applicable minimum import price (‘MIP’) on the day when the undertaking invoice was issued.
Kadar preverjanje pokaže, da popusti in rabati niso bili vključeni v trgovski račun, se poberejo dajatve, dolgovane v skladu s členom 3(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, členom 2(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/367, členom 2(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 in členom 2(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/366.
Where that verification reveals that the price paid is lower than the MIP, the duties due as a consequence under Article 8(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 and Article 13(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 shall be collected.
Informacije v skladu z odstavkom 1 se lahko uporabljajo le za namene izvrševanja dajatev, dolgovanih v skladu s členom 3(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, členom 2(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/367, členom 2(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 in členom 2(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/366.
Where that verification reveals that discounts and rebates have not been included in the commercial invoice, the duties due as a consequence under Article 3(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013, Article 2(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367, Article 2(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 and Article 2(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 shall be collected.
V zvezi s tem lahko carinski organi držav članic zagotovijo te informacije dolžnikom navedenih dajatev izključno za namen varovanja njihovih pravic do obrambe.
The information in accordance with paragraph 1 may only be used for the purpose of enforcement of duties due under Article 3(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013, Article 2(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367, Article 2(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 and Article 2(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366.
Take informacije se v nobenem primeru ne smejo razkriti tretjim osebam.
In this context, customs authorities of the Member States may provide the debtor of those duties with this information for the sole purpose of safeguarding their rights of defence.
Člen 4
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 5. septembra 2017
Done at Brussels, 5 September 2017.
Predsednik
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 1.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 55.
UL L 56, 3.3.2017, str. 131.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 1.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 66.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 66.
UL L 152, 5.6.2013, str. 5.
OJ L 56, 3.3.2017, p. 1.
UL L 209, 3.8.2013, str. 26.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 214.
UL L 139, 5.6.2015, str. 30.
OJ L 270, 11.9.2014, p. 6.
UL L 218, 19.8.2015, str. 1.
OJ L 139, 5.6.2015, p. 30.
UL L 295, 12.11.2015, str. 23.
OJ L 218, 19.8.2015, p. 1.
UL C 405, 5.12.2015, str. 8.
OJ L 295, 12.11.2015, p. 23.
UL C 405, 5.12.2015, str. 20.
OJ C 405, 5.12.2015, p. 8.
UL C 405, 5.12.2015, str. 33.
OJ C 405, 5.12.2015, p. 20.
UL L 23, 29.1.2016, str. 47.
OJ C 405, 5.12.2015, p. 33.
UL L 37, 12.2.2016, str. 76.
OJ L 23, 29.1.2016, p. 47.
UL L 37, 12.2.2016, str. 56.
OJ L 37, 12.2.2016, p. 76.
UL L 170, 29.6.2016, str. 5.
OJ L 37, 12.2.2016, p. 56.
UL L 222, 17.8.2016, str. 10.
OJ L 170, 29.6.2016, p. 5.
UL L 228, 23.8.2016, str. 16.
OJ L 222, 17.8.2016, p. 10.
UL L 308, 16.11.2016, str. 8.
OJ L 228, 23.8.2016, p. 16.
UL L 333, 8.12.2016, str. 4.
OJ L 308, 16.11.2016, p. 8.
UL C 67, 3.3.2017, str. 16.
OJ L 333, 8.12.2016, p. 4.
UL L 71, 16.3.2017, str. 5.
OJ C 67, 3.3.2017, p. 16.
UL L 86, 31.3.2017, str. 14.
OJ L 71, 16.3.2017, p. 5.
UL L 142, 2.6.2017, str. 43.
OJ L 86, 31.3.2017, p. 14.
UL L 201, 2.8.2017, str. 3.
OJ L 142, 2.6.2017, p. 43.
UL L 218, 24.8.2017, str. 10.
OJ L 201, 2.8.2017, p. 3.
UL L 343, 29.12.2015, str. 558.
OJ L 218, 24.8.2017, p. 10.
UL L 269, 10.10.2013, str. 1.
OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p. 558.
PRILOGA I