natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Based on the information available to the Commission, the importer involved in the above transaction was related to Osda Solar.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so na voljo Komisiji, je bil uvoznik, vključen v navedeno transakcijo, povezan z družbo Osda Solar.
As this importer is not listed as related party in the undertaking, Osda Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 19 and 21.
Ker ta uvoznik v zavezi ni naveden kot povezana stranka, je družba Osda Solar kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 19 in 21.
In addition, this related importer issued at least one resale invoice to the final customer in the Union for which the MIP was not respected.
Poleg tega je ta povezani uvoznik izdal vsaj en račun nadaljnje prodaje končni stranki v Uniji, pri katerem ni bila upoštevana minimalna uvozna cena.
Therefore, Osda Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 18 and 23.
Zato je družba Osda Solar kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 18 in 23.
Sales by Qixin Solar
Prodaja s strani družbe Qixin Solar
In its quarterly reports, Qixin Solar had reported a sales transaction of the product covered to an allegedly unrelated importer in the Union and had issued an undertaking invoice.
Družba Qixin Solar je v svojih četrtletnih poročilih poročala o prodajni transakciji zadevnega izdelka domnevno nepovezanemu uvozniku v Uniji in je izdala račun na podlagi zaveze.
Based on the information available to the Commission, the importer involved in the above transaction was related to Qixin Solar.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so na voljo Komisiji, je bil uvoznik, vključen v navedeno transakcijo, povezan z družbo Qixin Solar.
As this importer is not listed as related party in the undertaking, Qixin Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 19 and 21.
Ker ta uvoznik v zavezi ni naveden kot povezana stranka, je družba Qixin Solar kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 19 in 21.
In addition, the related importer issued at least one resale invoice to the final customer in the Union for which the MIP was not respected.
Poleg tega je ta povezani uvoznik izdal vsaj en račun nadaljnje prodaje končni stranki v Uniji, pri katerem ni bila upoštevana minimalna uvozna cena.
Therefore, Qixin Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 18 and 23.
Zato je družba Qixin Solar kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 18 in 23.
Moreover, in the month in which the transaction referred to in recital 29 had taken place, Qixin Solar carried out direct sales of the product covered to the same customer, thus entering into a trading system leading to cross-compensation.
Poleg tega je družba Qixin Solar v mesecu, v katerem je bila izvršena transakcija iz uvodne izjave 29, opravila neposredno prodajo navedenega izdelka isti stranki, s čimer je začela sistem trgovanja, ki ima za posledico navzkrižno kompenzacijo.
Therefore, Qixin Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recital 21.
Zato je družba Qixin Solar kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodni izjavi 21.
Sales by Linuo
Prodaja s strani družbe Linuo
In its quarterly reports, Linuo had reported a sales transaction of the product covered to an allegedly unrelated importer in the Union and had issued an undertaking invoice.
Družba Linuo je v svojih četrtletnih poročilih poročala o prodajni transakciji zadevnega izdelka domnevno nepovezanemu uvozniku v Uniji in je izdala račun na podlagi zaveze.
Based on the information available to the Commission, the importer involved in the above transaction was related to Linuo.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so na voljo Komisiji, je bil uvoznik, vključen v navedeno transakcijo, povezan z družbo Linuo.
As this importer is not listed as related party in the undertaking, Linuo breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 19 and 21.
Ker ta uvoznik v zavezi ni naveden kot povezana stranka, je družba Linuo kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 19 in 21.
In addition, this related importer issued at least one re-sale invoice to the final customer in the Union for which the MIP was not respected.
Poleg tega je ta povezani uvoznik izdal vsaj en račun nadaljnje prodaje končni stranki v Uniji, pri katerem ni bila upoštevana minimalna uvozna cena.
Therefore, Linuo breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 18 and 23.
Zato je družba Linuo kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 18 in 23.
E. INVALIDATION OF UNDERTAKING INVOICES
E. RAZVELJAVITEV RAČUNOV NA PODLAGI ZAVEZE
The information contained in the quarterly reports and the evidence received demonstrate that the re-sale invoices referred to in recitals 27, 29 and 32 and the undertaking invoices referred to in recital 30 are linked to the following transactions.
Informacije iz četrtletnih poročil in prejeti dokazi kažejo, da so računi nadaljnje prodaje iz uvodnih izjav 27, 29 in 32 ter računi na podlagi zaveze iz uvodne izjave 30 povezani z naslednjimi transakcijami.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 3(2)(b) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and Article 2(2)(b) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, these invoices are declared invalid.
Zato se v skladu s členom 3(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1239/2013 ti računi razglasijo za neveljavne.
The customs debt incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation should be recovered by the national customs authorities under Article 105(3)-(6) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [21] when the withdrawal of the undertaking in relation to the three exporting producers together with their related companies in the Union enters into force.
Carinski dolg, ki je nastal ob sprejetju deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet, bi morali nacionalni carinski organi v skladu s členom 105(3)–(6) Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [21] izterjati ob začetku veljavnosti umika zaveze za tri proizvajalce izvoznike, skupaj z njihovimi povezanimi družbami v Uniji.
The national customs authorities responsible for the collection of duties will be informed accordingly.In this context, the Commission recalls that pursuant to Article 3(1)(b) read in conjunction with Annex III, No 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and to Article 2(1)(b) read in conjunction with Annex 2, No 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, imports are only exempted from duties if the invoice indicates the price and possible rebates.
Nacionalni carinski organi, ki so pristojni za pobiranje dajatev, bodo o tem ustrezno obveščeni.V tem okviru Komisija poudarja, da je v skladu s členom 3(1)(b) v povezavi s točko 7 Priloge III k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(1)(b) v povezavi s točko 7 Priloge 2 k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 1239/2013 uvoz oproščen dajatev le, če so na računu navedeni cena in morebitni rabati.
The Commission has accordingly assessed the impact of the breaches by Osda Solar, Qixin Solar, and Linuo on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
Komisija je ustrezno ocenila učinek kršitev s strani družb Osda Solar, Qixin Solar in Linuo na izvedljivost zaveze z učinkom za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
Although the breaches by the three exporting producers show a similar pattern, the Commission considers that the responsibility for the breaches lies with the exporting producers in question; the monitoring has so far not revealed systematic breaches of this pattern by a major number of exporting producers or the CCCME.
Čeprav kršitve s strani treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov kažejo podoben vzorec, Komisija meni, da se odgovornost za kršitve pripiše navedenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom; s spremljanjem doslej niso bile razkrite nobene sistematične kršitve s strani večjega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali CCCME.
At present, the Commission considers that the overall functioning of the undertaking is not affected and that there are no grounds for withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
Trenutno Komisija ugotavlja, da delovanje v skladu z zavezo na splošno ni ogroženo in da ni razlogov za umik sprejetja zaveze za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
However, by letter of 11 July 2016 the Commission informed the CCCME about the above breaches by the three exporting producers showing a similar pattern and stated at the same time that should breaches of a similar pattern persist in the future, the Commission might re-assess the overall practicability of the undertaking.
Vendar je Komisija v dopisu z dne 11. julija 2016 obvestila CCCME o zadevnih kršitvah s strani treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki imajo podoben vzorec, in navedla, da bo morda ponovno ocenila splošno izvedljivost zaveze, če bi se kršitve s podobnim vzorcem nadaljevale v prihodnje.
Two exporting producers submitted limited comments after the disclosure on the sales channels or on the compliance with the MIP.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika sta predložila nekaj pripomb po razkritju v zvezi s prodajnimi kanali oziroma upoštevanjem minimalne uvozne cene.
However, the comments were of a confidential nature and despite the Commission's request no non-confidential summaries were provided within the deadline set for that purpose.
Vendar so bile pripombe zaupne narave in kljub zahtevi Komisije nista v roku, določenem v ta namen, predložila nobenega nezaupnega povzetka.
Under Article 19(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 29(3) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, these comments may thus be disregarded.
V skladu s členom 19(3) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 29(3) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe se lahko te pripombe prezrejo.
In any event, the comments received were not such as to alter the Commission's assessment regarding the breaches referred to in recitals 26 to 32 and the invalidation of the undertaking invoices referred to in recital 33.
V vsakem primeru prejete pripombe niso spremenile ocene Komisije v zvezi s kršitvami iz uvodnih izjav 26 do 32 in razveljavitvijo računov na podlagi zaveze iz uvodne izjave 33.
H. WITHDRAWAL OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING AND IMPOSITIONS OF DEFINITIVE DUTIES
H. UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZE IN UVEDBA DOKONČNIH DAJATEV
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and also in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking for Osda Solar, Qixin Solar and Linuo together with their related companies in the Union shall be withdrawn.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe ter tudi v skladu s pogoji zaveze sklenila, da se sprejetje zaveze za družbe Osda Solar, Qixin Solar in Linuo in njihovimi povezanimi družbami v Uniji umakne.
Accordingly, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 automatically apply to imports originating in or consigned from the PRC of the product concerned and produced by Osda Solar (TARIC additional code B859), Qixin Solar (TARIC additional code B860) and Linuo (TARIC additional code B869) as of the day of entry into force of this Regulation.
V skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe se dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, in dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013, začneta samodejno uporabljati za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK ali ki je od tam poslan in ga proizvajajo družbe Osda Solar (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B859), Qixin Solar (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B860) in Linuo (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B869) z dnem začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
For information purposes the table in the Annex to this Regulation lists the exporting producers for whom the acceptance of the undertaking by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU is not affected,
V informativne namene so v tabeli v Prilogi k tej uredbi navedeni proizvajalci izvozniki, za katere se ohrani sprejetje zaveze z Izvedbenim sklepom 2013/707/EU –
Acceptance of the undertaking in relation to Ningbo Osda Solar Co.
Sprejetje zaveze v zvezi z družbo Ningbo Osda Solar Co.
Ltd, covered by the TARIC additional code B859, Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co.
Ltd, ki je zajeta z dodatno oznako TARIC: B859, družbo Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co.
Ltd together with its related company in the Union, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code B860 and SHANDONG LINUO PHOTOVOLTAIC HI-TECH CO.
Ltd, skupaj z njeno povezano družbo v Uniji, ki sta skupaj zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC B860, in družbo SHANDONG LINUO PHOTOVOLTAIC HI-TECH CO.
LTD together with its related company in the Union, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code B869 is hereby withdrawn.
LTD, skupaj z njeno povezano družbo v Uniji, ki sta skupaj zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC B869, se umakne.
The following undertaking invoices are declared invalid:
Naslednji računi na podlagi zaveze se razglasijo za neveljavne:
National customs authorities are hereby directed to recover the customs debt incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation under Article 3(2)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and Article 2(2)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013.
Nacionalnim carinskim organom se odreja, da izterjajo carinski dolg, ki je nastal ob sprejetju deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet, v skladu s členom 3(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013.
OJ L 218, 19.8.2015, p. 1.
UL L 218, 19.8.2015, str. 1.
OJ L 295, 12.11.2015, p. 23.
UL L 295, 12.11.2015, str. 23.
OJ C 405, 5.12.2015, p. 8.
UL C 405, 5.12.2015, str. 8.
OJ C 405, 5.12.2015, p. 20.
UL C 405, 5.12.2015, str. 20.
OJ C 405, 5.12.2015, p. 33.
UL C 405, 5.12.2015, str. 33.
OJ L 23, 29.1.2016, p. 47.
UL L 23, 29.1.2016, str. 47.
OJ L 37, 12.2.2016, p. 76.
UL L 37, 12.2.2016, str. 76.
OJ L 37, 12.2.2016, p. 56.
UL L 37, 12.2.2016, str. 56.
OJ L 170, 29.6.2016, p. 5.
UL L 170, 29.6.2016, str. 5.
OJ L 222, 17.8.2016, p.
UL L 222, 17.8.2016, str. 10.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1403
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1403
excluding ICES Subdivisions 27 and 28.2 from the application of a fishery closure period in 2016
o izključitvi podrazdelkov ICES 27 in 28.2 iz uporabe obdobja zaprtja ribolova v letu 2016
Provisions for setting the fisheries closure periods for cod stocks in the Baltic Sea are set out in Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007.
Uredba (ES) št. 1098/2007 vsebuje določbe o določitvi obdobij zaprtja ribolova za staleže trske v Baltskem morju.
Under Article 29(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007, the Commission may exclude ICES Subdivisions 27 and 28.2 from the scope of the fisheries closure period if the amount of cod caught in ICES Subdivisions 27 and 28.2 during the most recent reporting period was below a certain threshold.
V skladu s členom 29(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1098/2007 lahko Komisija izključi podrazdelka ICES 27 in 28.2 iz uporabe obdobja zaprtja ribolova, če je količina trske, ulovljene v podrazdelkih ICES 27 in 28.2 v zadnjem obdobju poročanja, pod določenim pragom.
Taking into account the reports submitted by the relevant Member States and the advice of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries, ICES Subdivisions 27 and 28.2 should be excluded from the scope of the said fisheries closure period in 2016.
Ob upoštevanju poročil, ki so jih predložile zadevne države članice, ter mnenja Znanstvenega, tehničnega in gospodarskega odbora za ribištvo bi bilo treba podrazdelka ICES 27 in 28.2 v letu 2016 izključiti iz uporabe navedenega obdobja zaprtja ribolova.
Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007 shall not apply to ICES Subdivisions 27 and 28.2 in 2016.
Člen 8(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1098/2007 se v letu 2016 ne uporablja za podrazdelka ICES 27 in 28.2.
OJ L 248, 22.9.2007, p. 1.
UL L 248, 22.9.2007, str. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1404
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1404
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1407
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1407
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pão de Ló de Ovar (PGI))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Pão de Ló de Ovar (ZGO))
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Portugal's application to register the name ‘Pão de Ló de Ovar’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je bil zahtevek Portugalske za registracijo imena „Pão de Ló de Ovar“ objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pão de Ló de Ovar’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Ker v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Komisija ni prejela nobene izjave o ugovoru, bi bilo treba ime „Pão de Ló de Ovar“ registrirati –
The name ‘Pão de Ló de Ovar’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
Ime „Pão de Ló de Ovar“ (ZGO) se registrira.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 12. avgusta 2016
Done at Brussels, 12 August 2016.
V imenu predsednika
Member of the Commission
UL C 141, 22.4.2016, str. 16.
OJ C 141, 22.4.2016, p. 16.
Ime iz prvega odstavka opredeljuje proizvod skupine 2.3 Kruh, fino pecivo, slaščice, keksi in drugi pekovski izdelki iz Priloge XI k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 [3].Člen 2
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1408
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1408
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Steirische Käferbohne (PDO))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Steirische Käferbohne (ZOP))
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Austria's application to register the name ‘Steirische Käferbohne’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je bil zahtevek Avstrije za registracijo imena „Steirische Käferbohne“ objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Steirische Käferbohne’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Ker v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Komisija ni prejela nobenega ugovora, bi bilo treba ime „Steirische Käferbohne“ registrirati –
The name ‘Steirische Käferbohne’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
Ime „Steirische Käferbohne“ (ZOP) se registrira.
Member of the Commission
UL C 127, 9.4.2016, str. 9.
OJ C 127, 9.4.2016, p. 9.
Ime iz prvega odstavka opredeljuje proizvod skupine 1.6 Sadje, zelenjava in žita, sveži ali predelani, iz Priloge XI k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 [3].Člen 2
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1409
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1409
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Φασόλια Γίγαντες — Ελέφαντες Καστοριάς (Fasolia Gigantes — Elefantes Kastorias) (PGI))
o odobritvi spremembe specifikacije za ime, vpisano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb, ki ni manjša (Φασόλια Γίγαντες – Ελέφαντες Καστοριάς (Fasolia Gigantes – Elefantes Kastorias) (ZGO))
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Greece's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Φασόλια Γίγαντες — Ελέφαντες Καστοριάς’ (Fasolia Gigantes — Elefantes Kastorias), registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1428/2003 [2].
Komisija je v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 53(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 proučila zahtevek Grčije za odobritev spremembe specifikacije za zaščiteno geografsko označbo „Φασόλια Γίγαντες – Ελέφαντες Καστοριάς“ (Fasolia Gigantes – Elefantes Kastorias), registrirano v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1428/2003 [2].
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Φασόλια Γίγαντες — Ελέφαντες Καστοριάς’ (Fasolia Gigantes — Elefantes Kastorias) (PGI) are hereby approved.
Sprememba specifikacije, objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v zvezi z imenom „Φασόλια Γίγαντες – Ελέφαντες Καστοριάς“ (Fasolia Gigantes – Elefantes Kastorias) (ZGO), se odobri.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1428/2003 of 11 August 2003 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 on the entry of certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs ‘ΦΑΣΟΛΙΑ ΓΙΓΑΝΤΕΣ — ΕΛΕΦΑΝΤΕΣ ΚΑΣΤΟΡΙΑΣ’ (Fasolia Gigantes — Elefantes Kastorias) ( OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 7).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1428/2003 z dne 11. avgusta 2003 o dopolnitvi Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2400/96 o vnosu nekaterih imen v Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb, določen v Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2081/92 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila „ΦΑΣΟΛΙΑ ΓΙΓΑΝΤΕΣ – ΕΛΕΦΑΝΤΕΣ ΚΑΣΤΟΡΙΑΣ“ (Fasolia Gigantes – Elefantes Kastorias) ( UL L 203, 12.8.2003, str. 7).
OJ C 135, 16.4.2016, p. 5.
UL C 135, 16.4.2016, str. 5.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1410
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1410
of 23 August 2016
z dne 23. avgusta 2016
Done at Brussels, 23 August 2016.
V Bruslju, 23. avgusta 2016
of 24 August 2016
z dne 24. avgusta 2016
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 health claims made on foods are prohibited unless they are authorised by the Commission in accordance with that Regulation and included in a list of permitted claims.
Zdravstvene trditve na živilih so v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1924/2006 prepovedane, razen če jih Komisija v skladu z navedeno uredbo odobri in uvrsti na seznam dovoljenih trditev.
Following an application from SmithKline Beecham Limited, submitted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to caffeine and increased alertness (Question No EFSA-Q-2013-00399 [2]).
Družba SmithKline Beecham Limited je v skladu s členom 13(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 vložila vlogo, Agencija pa je morala pripraviti mnenje o zdravstveni trditvi v zvezi s kofeinom in večjo budnostjo (vprašanje št.
The claim proposed by the applicant was worded as follows: ‘caffeine helps to increase alertness’.
EFSA-Q-2013-00399 [2]).
On 21 February 2014, the Commission and the Member States received the scientific opinion from the Authority.
Vložnik je predlagal naslednjo trditev: „Kofein pomaga povečati budnost“.
In its opinion, the Authority recalled that a claim on caffeine and increased alertness in the general adult population for products containing at least 75 mg of caffeine per serving had already been assessed by the Authority with a favourable outcome [3].
Komisija in države članice so 21. februarja 2014 prejele znanstveno mnenje Agencije.