natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Delsolar (Wujiang) Ltd together with its related company in the Union, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code: B792 (‘Delsolar’);
družba Delsolar (Wujiang) Ltd, skupaj z njeno povezano družbo v Uniji, ki sta združeno zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC: B792 („Delsolar“);
CNPV Dongying Solar Power Co.
družba CNPV Dongying Solar Power Co.
Ltd covered by the TARIC additional code: B813 (‘CNPV’);
Ltd, ki je zajeta z dodatno oznako TARIC: B813 („CNPV“);
MOTECH (Suzhou) RENEWABLE ENERGY CO.
družba MOTECH (Suzhou) RENEWABLE ENERGY CO.
LTD covered by the TARIC additional code: B852 (‘MOTECH’);
LTD, ki je zajeta z dodatno oznako TARIC: B852 („MOTECH“);
Xi'an LONGi Silicon Materials Corp. and Wuxi LONGi Silicon Materials Co.
družbi Xi'an LONGi Silicon Materials Corp. in Wuxi LONGi Silicon Materials Co.
Ltd, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code: B897 (‘Xi'an LONGi’); and
Ltd, ki sta združeno zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC: B897 („Xi'an LONGi“); ter
LERRI Solar Technology (Zhejiang) Co.
družba LERRI Solar Technology (Zhejiang) Co.
Ltd together with its related company in the Union, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code: B898 (‘LERRI Solar’).
Ltd, skupaj z njeno povezano družbo v Uniji, ki sta združeno zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC: B898 („LERRI Solar“).
By Implementing Decision 2014/657/EU [9] the Commission accepted a proposal by the exporting producers together with the CCCME for clarifications concerning the implementation of the undertaking for the products concerned covered by the undertaking, that is modules and cells originating in or consigned from the PRC, currently falling within CN codes ex85414090 (TARIC codes 8541409021, 8541409029, 8541409031 and 8541409039) produced by the exporting producers (‘product covered’).
Komisija je z Izvedbenim sklepom 2014/657/EU [9] sprejela predlog proizvajalcev izvoznikov in CCCME za pojasnila v zvezi z izvajanjem zaveze za zadevne izdelke, ki jih zaveza zajema, in sicer module in celice s poreklom iz LRK ali ki so od tam poslani, trenutno uvrščene pod oznake KN ex85414090 (oznake TARIC 8541409021, 8541409029, 8541409031 in 8541409039), ki jih proizvajajo proizvajalci izvozniki („zajeti izdelek“).
The anti-dumping and countervailing duties referred to in recital 4 above, together with the undertaking, are jointly referred to as ‘measures’.
Protidampinška in izravnalna dajatev iz uvodne izjave (4) ter zaveza se skupaj imenujejo „ukrepi“.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185 [17], the Commission extended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 on imports of the products concerned originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China to imports of the product concerned consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/185 [17] dokončno protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno z Uredbo (EU) št. 1238/2013 na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, razširila na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov, poslanih iz Malezije in Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana ali ne.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 [18], the Commission extended the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 on imports of the products concerned originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China to imports of the product concerned consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/184 [18] dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno z Uredbo (EU) št. 1239/2013 na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, razširila na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov, poslanih iz Malezije in Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana ali ne.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1045 [19] the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another exporting producer.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/1045 [19] umaknila svoje sprejetje zaveze za še enega od proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
B. TERMS OF THE UNDERTAKING THAT ALLOW FOR WITHDRAWAL IN THE ABSENCE OF A BREACH
B. POGOJI ZAVEZE, KI OMOGOČAJO UMIK, ČE KRŠITVE NI
The undertaking stipulates that the Commission may withdraw the acceptance of the undertaking during its period of application, if monitoring and enforcement prove to be impracticable, including any change in circumstances.
V zavezi je določeno, da lahko Komisija umakne sprejetje zaveze v fazi njenega obdobja uporabe, če se spremljanje in izvrševanje izkažeta za neizvedljivi, vključno s kakršno koli spremembo okoliščin.
In addition, any exporting producer may also voluntarily withdraw its undertaking at any time during its application.
Poleg tega lahko vsak proizvajalec izvoznik svojo zavezo tudi prostovoljno umakne kadar koli med njeno uporabo.
C. GROUNDS TO WITHDRAW THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING FOR DELSOLAR AND MOTECH
C. RAZLOGI ZA UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZE ZA DRUŽBI DELSOLAR IN MOTECH
Both Delsolar and MOTECH have a related party in Taiwan that were granted exemption in the anti-circumvention investigations referred to in recitals 14 and 15.
Družbi Delsolar in MOTECH imata povezano stranko v Tajvanu, ki ji je bilo dodeljeno izvzetje v preiskavah proti izogibanju, navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (14) in (15).
The Commission analysed the implication of these exemptions on the practicability of the undertaking.
Komisija je analizirala posledice teh izvzetij na izvedljivost zaveze.
The exemptions represent a change in circumstances compared to those at the time of accepting the undertaking.
Izvzetja pomenijo spremembo okoliščin v primerjavi s tistimi ob sprejetju zaveze.
Their objective is to exempt imports into the Union of the products concerned which were manufactured by the related parties of Delsolar and MOTECH in Taiwan.
Njihov cilj je izvzeti uvoz zadevnih izdelkov, ki jih proizvajajo povezane stranke družb Delsolar in MOTECH v Tajvanu, v Unijo.
Such imports fall outside the scope of the undertaking.
Tak uvoz ne spada v okvir zaveze.
The Commission considers that this exemption for imports into the Union creates a high risk of cross-compensation.
Komisija meni, da to izvzetje za uvoz v Unijo ustvarja veliko tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije.
In fact, the related parties exempted in the anti-circumvention investigation may sell the product concerned to the same Union customers to whom the product covered is sold and the prices for such transactions could be set in a way to compensate for the Minimum Import Price under the undertaking.
Povezane stranke, ki so izvzete iz preiskave proti izogibanju, lahko zadevni izdelek dejansko prodajajo istim potrošnikom v Uniji, ki se jim prodaja zajeti izdelek, pri čemer je cene za te transakcije mogoče določiti tako, da se nadomestijo minimalne uvozne cene v okviru zaveze.
The Commission is not in a position to monitor the sales to the same Union customers under the undertaking and from Taiwan.
Komisija ni v položaju, da bi spremljala prodajo istim strankam Unije na podlagi zaveze in iz Tajvana.
Therefore, the Commission concluded that the above exemptions render the monitoring of Delsolar's and MOTECH's undertaking impracticable.
Zato je Komisija sklenila, da je spremljanje navedenih izvzetij zaveze družb Delsolar in MOTECH neizvedljivo.
D. VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL BY LERRI SOLAR, XI'AN LONGi AND CNPV
D. PROSTOVOLJNI UMIK DRUŽB LERRI SOLAR, XI'AN LONGi IN CNPV
LERRI Solar notified the Commission in March 2016 that it wished to withdraw from the undertaking.
Družba LERRI Solar je marca 2016 obvestila Komisijo, da želi prostovoljno umakniti svojo zavezo.
E. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS
E. PISNA STALIŠČA IN ZASLIŠANJA
Delsolar and MOTECH submitted comments.
Družbi Delsolar in MOTECH sta predložili pripombe.
Delsolar
Družba Delsolar je izpodbijala trditev, da izvzetje, dodeljeno njeni tajvanski povezani stranki, pomeni spremembo okoliščin.
Delsolar contested that the exemption granted to its Taiwanese related party represents a change in circumstances.
Družba Delsolar je Komisijo uradno obvestila o združitvi s tajvansko družbo med prvotnimi preiskavami iz uvodne izjave 4, čemur Komisija ni nasprotovala.
Delsolar notified the Commission on the merger with the Taiwanese company in the original investigations referred to in recital 4 which the Commission did not object.
Ker zadevni izdelek, ki ga proizvaja tajvanska povezana stranka družbe Delsolar, ni bil predmet ukrepov niti pred preiskavami proti izogibanju niti po njih, je položaj enak kot pred začetkom preiskav proti izogibanju.
As the product concerned produced by Delsolar's Taiwanese related party has neither before nor after the anti-circumvention investigations been subject to the measures, the situation does not differ from the one that existed prior to the anti-circumvention investigations.
Komisija te trditve ne more sprejeti.
The Commission cannot accept this argument.
Prvič, Komisija opozarja, da je v obdobju preiskav tržni delež uvoza iz tretjih držav, razen LRK, v Unijo znašal 6,8 % celotnega uvoza na trg Unije.
First of all, the Commission recalls that the market share of imports from third countries excluding the PRC into the Union was 6,8 % of the Union market during the investigation period.
Natančneje, tržni delež uvoza iz Tajvana je znašal 0,8 % (tabela 12 Uredbe (EU) št. 513/2013).
In particular, the market share of imports from Taiwan was 0,8 % (Table 12 of Regulation (EU) No 513/2013).
Iz teh podatkov je razvidno, da je izvoz iz obstoječih proizvodnih zmogljivosti družb, ki proizvajajo v Tajvanu in so povezane s kitajskimi družbami, ki so ponudile zavezo, zanemarljiv.
It follows from those figures that the exports from the existing production facilities of companies producing in Taiwan and related to Chinese companies having offered the undertaking were marginal.
Vendar je zaradi odobritve izvzetij v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 23(6) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe mogoče pričakovati, da bo tajvanska povezana stranka družbe Delsolar izvozila precejšnjo količino modulov in celic v Unijo.
However, as a result of the granting of the exemptions under Article 13(4) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 23(6) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, it can be expected that Delsolar's Taiwanese related party will export significant volumes of modules and cells to the Union.
Komisija se je odločila, da umakne sprejetje zaveze, ker obstaja nevarnost navzkrižne kompenzacije, ki je Komisija ne more nadzorovati.
The decision to withdraw the acceptance of the undertaking is due to risk of cross-compensation that the Commission cannot monitor.
Vprašanje o tem, ali za blago, proizvedeno v zmogljivostih v tretji državi, veljajo ukrepi, je brezpredmetno pri presoji spremljanja tveganj.
The issue of whether goods produced in third country facilities are subject to measures is not relevant in the assessment of monitoring risks.
Izvzetje se nanaša na uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvajajo tajvanske povezane stranke družbe Delsolar in je posebej namenjen na trg Unije.
The exemption concerns the imports of the product concerned manufactured by Delsolar's Taiwanese related party that are specifically destined to the Union market.
Zato to povzroča veliko tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije.
Therefore, it creates a high risk of cross-compensation.
Tudi ocena spremljanja tveganja se opravlja za vsak primer posebej in se lahko spreminja med trajanjem zaveze, saj ko se nekatera tveganja uresničijo, se pojavijo nova tveganja in Komisija lahko bolje oceni praktične vidike spremljanja posameznih primerov.
The assessment of monitoring risks is also case specific and might evolve during the lifetime of the undertaking, as certain risks materialize, new risks emerge and the Commission can better assess the practical aspects of case-specific monitoring.
V zvezi s tem ni pomembno, ali so se za uvoz pred začetkom preiskave proti izogibanju izvajali ti ukrepi.
Again, in this relation, it is irrelevant whether the imports prior to the anti-circumvention investigation were subject to the measures.
Družba Delsolar je trdila tudi, da zgolj izvzetje njene tajvanske povezane stranke ne zadostuje za ugotovitev, da je spremljanje zaveze družbe Delsolar postalo neizvedljivo.
Delsolar also claimed that the mere exemption of its related Taiwanese party does not warrant the conclusion that the monitoring of Delsolar's undertaking becomes impracticable.
Po mnenju družbe Delsolar je večje tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije zgolj hipotetično.
In Delsolar's view, the increased risk of cross-compensation is purely hypothetical.
Ker zaveza prepoveduje prodajo istim strankam, lahko vsaka kršitev privede do umika zaveze družbe Delsolar.
As the undertaking prohibits sales to the same customers, any violation could lead to the withdrawal of Delsolar's undertaking.
V zvezi s tem je družba Delsolar navedla, da zadevnega izdelka ne prodaja isti stranki, kateri zadevni izdelek prodaja njena tajvanska povezana stranka.
In this regard, Delsolar stated that it does not sell the product covered to the same customer to whom its Taiwanese related party sells the product concerned.
To se lahko preveri z obiski na kraju samem v prostorih družbe Delsolar in njene tajvanske povezane stranke.
The compliance can be verified by on-spot visits at the premises of Delsolar and its Taiwanese related party.
Poleg tega je družba Delsolar trdila, da je Komisija v preiskavah proti izogibanju, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 14 in 15, njeno tajvansko povezano stranko štela za dejanskega proizvajalca, ki se ne izogiba ukrepom.
In addition, Delsolar claimed that the Commission, in the anti-circumvention investigations referred to in recitals 14 and 15, considered its Taiwanese related party as a genuine producer not circumventing the measures.
Zato so vse trditve o potencialnem tveganju navzkrižne kompenzacije popolnoma špekulativne.
Hence, any allegation on the potential risk of cross-compensation is purely speculative.
Komisija to trditev zavrača.
The Commission rejects this argument.
V preiskavah proti izogibanju, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 14 in 15, je bilo ugotovljeno, da tajvanska povezana stranka družbe Delsolar ni sodelovala pri praksah izogibanja v smislu člena 13 osnovne protidampinške uredbe in člena 23 osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
However, the scope of those investigations did not include considering the risks related to Delsolar's undertaking.
Nobena od teh ugotovitev pa ne zagotavlja, da ni prišlo do izogibanja v smislu navzkrižne kompenzacije.
Neither those findings imply that no circumvention of the undertaking in the meaning of price cross-compensation took place.
Nasprotno, izvzetje, dodeljeno tajvanski povezani stranki družbe Delsolar, znatno povečuje tveganje izogibanja v povezavi z zavezo družbe Delsolar.
On the contrary, the exemption granted to the Delsolar' Taiwanese related party increases significantly the circumvention risks related to Delsolar's undertaking.
To pomeni, da je spremljanje zaveze družbe Delsolar oteženo.
Such exemption implies specific intention to sell to the Union.
Komisija v zvezi s tem tudi opozarja, da je postalo spremljanje zaveze še bolj težavno med njenim izvajanjem, zlasti glede praks izogibanja v Maleziji in na Tajvanu.
Hence, it would require the Commission to monitor the sales both under the undertaking and from Taiwan.
Komisija ne more spremljati prodaje iz Tajvana, ki ne spada v področje uporabe zaveze.
This renders the monitoring of Delsolar's undertaking impractical.
Poleg tega Komisija opozarja, da je družbi Delsolar ponudila možnost, da nadaljuje izvajanje zaveze, kar pa je družba Delsolar zavrnila.
The Commission also recalls in this regard that the monitoring of the undertaking has increasingly become more difficult during its implementation, in particular with regard to the circumvention practices found in Malaysia and Taiwan.
Nazadnje je družba Delsolar navedla, da je njen položaj primerljiv s katero koli drugo stranko družbe, ki sodeluje pri zavezi in ima povezane družbe s proizvodnimi zmogljivostmi v državah, za katere ne veljajo ukrepi.
In addition, the Commission recalls that it offered options to Delsolar to keep its undertaking practicable, which Delsolar refused to consider.
Komisija to trditev zavrača in opozarja na svojo utemeljitev iz uvodnih izjav 27 in 29.
Finally, Delsolar submitted that its situation is comparable to any other company party to the undertaking that has related companies with production facilities in countries not subject to the measures.
Podobno kot Delsolar je tudi družba MOTECH trdila, da je bilo njeno razmerje s povezano tajvansko stranko Komisiji poznano med prvotnimi preiskavami iz uvodne izjave 4.
Hence, the mere existence of the relationship does not per se render the monitoring of the undertaking impracticable.
Po sprejetju zaveze družbe MOTECH je Komisija potrdila, da izogibanja ni bilo.
The Commission rejects this argument and recalls its reasoning set out in recitals 27 and 29.
Prvič, Komisija se v zvezi s tem sklicuje na zavrnitev podobnih trditev, ki jih je navedla družba Delsolar.
MOTECH
Poleg tega Komisija te trditve ne more sprejeti tudi iz naslednjih razlogov.
Similarly to Delsolar, MOTECH argued that the relationship to its Taiwanese related party was known to the Commission during the original investigations referred to in recital 4.
Ob sprejetju zaveze je Komisija dejansko izvedla splošno analizo spremljanja tveganj.
By accepting the undertaking from MOTECH, the Commission confirmed that no circumvention existed.
Sprejetje samo po sebi ne pomeni, da izogibanje ne obstaja.
First of all, the Commission refers in that regard to the rejection of the similar arguments made by Delsolar.
Komisija meni, da izvzetje, dodeljeno tajvanski povezani stranki družbe MOTECH, povečuje tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije iz uvodne izjave 21.
Furthermore, the Commission also rejects this argument for the following reasons.
Komisija v zvezi s tem opozarja, da je postalo spremljanje zaveze še bolj težavno med njenim izvajanjem, zlasti glede praks izogibanja v Maleziji in na Tajvanu.
At the time of the acceptance of the undertaking the Commission indeed conducts an overall analysis of monitoring risks.
Komisija ni v položaju, da bi spremljala prodajo istim strankam Unije na podlagi zaveze in tistih iz Tajvana.
The acceptance per se does not imply that no circumvention exists.
Družba MOTECH je poleg tega navedla, da je Komisija z dodelitvijo izvzetja njeni tajvanski povezani stranki potrdila, da ni prišlo do izogibanja in navzkrižne kompenzacije v zvezi z družbo MOTECH in njeno tajvansko povezano stranko.
The Commission considers that the exemption granted to MOTECH's Taiwanese related party increases the risk of cross-compensation as referred to in recital 21.
Komisija je lahko spremljala uvoz iz družbe MOTECH in njene tajvanske povezane stranke, saj obe družbi uvažata v Unijo po ločenih dodatnih oznakah TARIC.
The Commission recalls in this regard that the monitoring of the undertaking has increasingly become more difficult during its implementation, in particular with regard to the circumvention practices found in Malaysia and Taiwan.
Izvzetje, odobreno v okviru preiskav proti izogibanju, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 14 in 15, potrjuje, da za tajvansko povezano stranko družbe MOTECH ni bila ugotovljena vključenost v prakse izogibanja.
The Commission is not in position to monitor the sales to the same Union customers under the undertaking and those from Taiwan.
Vendar ta ugotovitev ne vpliva na presojo izvedljivosti zaveze iz uvodnih izjav 21 in 22.
MOTECH also submitted that by granting exemption to its Taiwanese related party, the Commission confirmed that no circumvention and cross-compensation exist in relation to MOTECH and its Taiwanese related party.
Komisija je analizirala posledice tega izvzetja in ugotovila, da se je tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije povečalo.
The Commission could monitor the imports from MOTECH and its Taiwanese related party as both companies import into the Union under separate TARIC additional codes.
Komisija je upoštevala tudi izkušnje, pridobljene med spremljanjem zaveze, ko je ugotovila, da ne more spremljati prodaje istim strankam v Uniji na podlagi zaveze in iz Tajvana.
The exemption granted in the anti-circumvention investigations referred to in recitals 14 and 15 confirms that MOTECH's Taiwanese related party was not found to be engaged in circumvention practices.
F. UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZE IN UVEDBA DOKONČNIH DAJATEV
However, this finding is irrelevant to the assessment on the practicability of the undertaking set out in recitals 21 and 22.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe ter tudi v skladu s pogoji zaveze sklenila, da se sprejetje zaveze za družbe Delsolar, CNPV, MOTECH, Xi'an LONGi in LERRI Solar, skupaj z njihovimi povezanimi družbami v Uniji, umakne.
The Commission analysed the implication of this exemption and concluded the risk of cross-compensation has increased.
V skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe se dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, in dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013, začneta samodejno uporabljati za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK ali ki je od tam poslan in ga proizvajajo družbe Delsolar (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B792), CNPV (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B813), MOTECH (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B852), Xi'an LONGi (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B897) in LERRI Solar (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B898), z dnem začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
The Commission also took into account the experience gained during the monitoring of the undertaking when concluded that it is not in position to monitor the sales to the same Union customers under the undertaking and from Taiwan.
V informativne namene so v tabeli v Prilogi k tej uredbi navedeni proizvajalci izvozniki, za katere se ohrani sprejetje zaveze z Izvedbenim sklepom 2013/707/EU –
F. WITHDRAWAL OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING AND IMPOSITIONS OF DEFINITIVE DUTIES
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and also in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking for Delsolar, CNPV, MOTECH, Xi'an LONGi and LERRI Solar together with their related companies in the Union shall be withdrawn.
Člen 1
Accordingly, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 automatically apply to imports originating in or consigned from the PRC of the product concerned and produced by Delsolar (TARIC additional code: B792), CNPV (TARIC additional code: B813), MOTECH (TARIC additional code: B852), Xi'an LONGi (TARIC additional code: B897) and LERRI Solar (TARIC additional code: B898) as of the day of entry into force of this Regulation.
Sprejetje zaveze v zvezi z:
For information purposes the table in the Annex to this Regulation lists the exporting producers for whom the acceptance of the undertaking by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU is not affected,
družbo Delsolar (Wujiang) Ltd, skupaj z njeno povezano družbo v Uniji, ki sta združeno zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC: B792;
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
družbo CNPV Dongying Solar Power Co.
Article 1
Ltd, ki je zajeta z dodatno oznako TARIC: B813;
Acceptance of the undertaking in relation to
družbo MOTECH (Suzhou) RENEWABLE ENERGY CO.
Delsolar (Wujiang) Ltd together with its related company in the Union, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code: B792;
LTD, ki je zajeta z dodatno oznako TARIC: B852;
CNPV Dongying Solar Power Co.
družbama Xi'an LONGi Silicon Materials Corp. in Wuxi LONGi Silicon Materials Co.