natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Basic Regulation stresses the need to promote the objectives of the CFP internationally, ensuring that Union fishing activities outside Union waters are based on the same principles and standards as those applicable under Union law, while promoting a level playing field for Union operators and third-country operators.
Vendar se uredba o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu, uredba o dovoljenjih za ribolovne dejavnosti in uredba o nadzoru niso dosledno izvajale; zlasti so se pojavljala neskladja med uredbo o dovoljenjih za ribolovne dejavnosti in uredbo o nadzoru.
The FAR was intended to establish common ground for authorising fishing activities to be carried out by Union vessels outside Union waters with a view to supporting the fight against illegal, unreported and undeclared (‘IUU’) fishing and better control and monitoring of the Union fleet across the globe, as well as conditions for the authorising of third-country vessels fishing in Union waters.
Pri izvajanju uredbe o dovoljenjih za ribolovne dejavnosti je bilo odkritih tudi več vrzeli, saj ne rešuje nekaterih težav v zvezi z nadzorom, kot so zakup, zamenjava zastave ribiškega plovila in izdajanje dovoljenj za ribolov, ki jih pristojni organ tretje države izda ribiškemu plovilu Unije zunaj okvira sporazuma o partnerstvu o trajnostnem ribištvu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: neposredna dovoljenja).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 [8] (the ‘IUU Regulation’) was adopted in parallel to the FAR, and Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 [9] (‘the Control Regulation’) was adopted a year later.
Poleg tega so se pojavljale težave v zvezi z nekaterimi obveznostmi poročanja in delitvijo upravnih vlog med državami članicami in Komisijo.
Those Regulations are the three implementing pillars of the control and enforcement provisions of the CFP.
Osrednje načelo te uredbe je, da bi morala vsa plovila Unije, ki lovijo zunaj voda Unije, pridobiti dovoljenje svoje države članice zastave in da bi bilo treba vsa taka plovila ustrezno spremljati ne glede na to, kje in na podlagi katerega okvira delujejo.
However, the IUU Regulation, the FAR and the Control Regulation were not implemented consistently; in particular there were inconsistencies between the FAR and the Control Regulation.
Izdaja dovoljenja bi morala biti odvisna od izpolnjevanja osnovnega sklopa skupnih meril za izpolnjevanje pogojev.
The implementation of the FAR also revealed several loopholes, since some challenges in terms of control, such as chartering, reflagging and the issuance of fishing authorisations issued by a third-country competent authority to a Union fishing vessel outside the framework of an SFPA (‘direct authorisations’), were not covered.
Informacije, ki jih države članice zberejo in predložijo Komisiji, bi ji morale omogočati, da kadar koli posreduje pri spremljanju ribolovnih operacij vseh ribiških plovil Unije na katerem koli območju zunaj voda Unije.
Besides, some reporting obligations have proven difficult as has the division of administrative roles between the Member States and the Commission.
V zadnji letih je zunanja ribiška politika Unije zelo napredovala v smislu pogojev v partnerskih sporazumih o trajnostnem ribištvu in skrbnosti, s katero se izvajajo določbe.
The core principle of this Regulation is that any Union vessel fishing outside Union waters should be authorised by its flag Member State and monitored accordingly, irrespective of where it operates and the framework under which it does so.
Zato bi morala biti zaščita interesov Unije v smislu pravic do dostopa in pogojev v okviru partnerskih sporazumov o trajnostnem ribištvu prednostni cilj zunanje ribiške politike Unije, podobni pogoji pa bi morali veljati tudi za dejavnosti Unije zunaj področja veljave teh sporazumov.
The issuing of an authorisation should be dependent on a basic set of common eligibility criteria being fulfilled.
Podporna plovila lahko močno vplivajo na način, kako lahko ribiška plovila opravljajo svoje ribolovne operacije, in količino rib, ki jih lahko ulovijo.
The information gathered by the Member States and provided to the Commission should allow the Commission to intervene in the monitoring of the fishing operations of all Union fishing vessels in any given area outside Union waters at any time.
Ta plovila je zato treba upoštevati pri postopkih izdaje dovoljenj in poročanja, določenih v tej uredbi.
Recent years have seen considerable improvements in the Union’s external fisheries policy, in terms of the conditions and terms of SFPAs and the diligence with which the provisions are enforced.
Zamenjava zastave ribiškega plovila postane sporna, kadar je njen cilj zaobiti pravila SRP ali obstoječe ukrepe za ohranjanje in upravljanje morskih virov.
Safeguarding the Union’s interests in terms of access rights and conditions within the framework of SFPAs should therefore be a priority objective of the Union’s external fisheries policy and similar conditions should be applied to Union activities outside the scope of SFPAs.
Zato bi morala biti Unija sposobna take zamenjave zastave opredeliti, odkriti in preprečiti.
Support vessels may have a substantial impact on the way fishing vessels are able to carry out their fishing operations and on the quantity of fish they can retrieve.
V celotni življenjski dobi plovila, ki je v lasti gospodarskega subjekta Unije, bi bilo treba zagotoviti njegovo sledljivost in ustrezno spremljanje pretekle skladnosti, ne glede na to, pod katero zastavo pluje.
It is therefore necessary to take them into account in the authorisation and reporting processes set out in this Regulation.
Tak bi moral biti tudi namen zahteve, da mu Mednarodna pomorska organizacija (IMO) dodeli edinstveno številko plovila, kadar se to zahteva na podlagi prava Unije.
Reflagging operations become an issue when their objective is to circumvent CFP rules or existing conservation and management measures.
Plovila Unije lahko v vodah tretjih držav delujejo na podlagi določb sporazumov o partnerstvu o trajnostnem ribištvu, sklenjenih med Unijo in tretjimi državami, ali na podlagi neposrednih dovoljenj za ribolov, ki so jih pridobila od tretjih držav, če ni veljavnega sporazuma o partnerstvu o trajnostnem ribištvu.
The Union should therefore be able to define, detect and hamper such operations.
V obeh primerih bi se morale te dejavnosti opravljati na pregleden in trajnosten način.
Traceability and proper follow-up of compliance history should be ensured throughout the lifespan of a vessel owned by a Union operator regardless of the flag or flags it operates under.
Države članice zastave lahko plovilom, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo, na podlagi opredeljenega sklopa meril in pod pogojem spremljanja dovolijo, da tretje države, ki so obalne države, zaprosijo za neposredna dovoljenja in jih od njih pridobijo.
The requirement that a unique vessel number be granted by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) where required under Union law should also serve that purpose.
Dovoljenje za ribolovne operacije bi bilo treba izdati šele, ko je država članica zastave prepričana, da ta dejavnost ne bo ogrožala trajnosti in če Komisija nima ustrezno utemeljenih ugovorov.
In third-country waters, Union vessels may operate either under the provisions of SFPAs concluded between the Union and third countries or by obtaining direct fishing authorisations from third countries if no SFPA is in force.
Gospodarskemu subjektu bi bilo treba dovoliti, da začne izvajati ribolovne operacije šele, ko je prejel dovoljenje tako od države članice zastave kot tudi obalne države.
In both cases these activities should be carried out in a transparent and sustainable way.
Ribiška plovila Unije ne smejo loviti v vodah pod pristojnostjo ali suverenostjo tretjih držav, s katerimi ima Unija sklenjen sporazum, ne pa tudi veljavnega protokola.
Flag Member States may authorise the vessels flying their flag to seek and obtain direct authorisations from third countries which are coastal states, under a defined set of criteria and subject to monitoring.
V primeru takšnega sporazuma, kadar vsaj tri leta ni bil v veljavi noben protokol, bi morala Komisija preučiti razloge za takšno stanje in sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe, ki lahko vključujejo predlog za pogajanja o novem protokolu.
The fishing operation should be authorised once the flag Member State is satisfied that it will not undermine sustainability and where the Commission has no duly justified objection.
Posebno vprašanje, ki se nanaša na sporazume o partnerstvu o trajnostnem ribištvu, je ponovna dodelitev premalo izkoriščenih ribolovnih možnosti, ki nastane, kadar ribolovne možnosti, dodeljene državam članicam z ustreznimi uredbami Sveta, niso bile v celoti izkoriščene.
The operator should be allowed to starts its fishing operation only after having been given the authorisation from both the flag Member State and the coastal state.
Ker se stroški dostopa, določeni v sporazumih o partnerstvu o trajnostnem ribištvu, pretežno financirajo iz splošnega proračuna Unije, je sistem začasne ponovne dodelitve in nadaljnje dodelitve pomemben za varovanje finančnih interesov Unije in zagotovitev, da se izkoristijo vse ribolovne možnosti, ki so bile plačane.
Union fishing vessels are not allowed to fish in waters under the jurisdiction or sovereignty of third countries with which the Union has an agreement but no protocol in force.
Zato je treba pojasniti in izboljšati te sisteme dodelitve, ki bi morali biti mehanizmi v skrajnem primeru.
In the case of such an agreement, where no protocol has been in force for at least 3 years, the Commission should examine the reasons for the situation and take appropriate action, which could include proposing to negotiate a new protocol.
Uporabljati bi se morali začasno in ne bi smeli vplivati na prvotno dodelitev ribolovnih možnosti državam članicam v skladu z veljavnimi načeli relativne stabilnosti.
A specific issue pertaining to SFPAs is the reallocation of underutilised fishing opportunities that occurs when fishing opportunities allocated to Member States by the relevant Council Regulations are not fully used.
Ponovna dodelitev bi se morala izvesti šele, ko bi se zadevne države članice odpovedale svojim pravicam do medsebojne izmenjave ribolovnih možnosti, prvenstveno pa bi morala biti obravnavana v okviru sporazumov o partnerstvu o trajnostnem ribištvu, ki zagotavljajo dostop do mešanega ribolova.
Since the access costs set out in the SFPAs are financed for a large part by the Union general budget, a temporary reallocation and sub-allocation system is important to preserve Union financial interests and ensure that no fishing opportunity which has been paid for is wasted.
Kadar tretja država ni pogodbenica v regionalni organizaciji za upravljanje ribištva, si lahko Unija s tretjo državo, s katero se preučuje možnost sklenitve sporazuma o partnerstvu o trajnostnem ribištvu, prizadeva zagotoviti dodelitve deleža sredstev sektorske podpore, da se zadevni tretji državi olajša pristop v regionalno organizacijo za upravljanje ribištva.
It is therefore necessary to clarify and improve those allocation systems, which should be a last resort mechanism.
Za ribolovne operacije pod okriljem regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva in ribolovne dejavnosti na odprtem morju bi bilo treba prav tako pridobiti dovoljenje države članice zastave in spoštovati posebna pravila regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva ali pravo Unije, ki ureja ribolovne operacije na odprtem morju.
Its application should be temporary and it should not affect the initial allocation of fishing opportunities among Member States in accordance with applicable relative stability principles.
Unija bi morala zaradi izpolnjevanja mednarodnih obveznosti Unije v regionalnih organizacijah za upravljanje ribištva ter v skladu s cilji iz člena 28 osnovne uredbe spodbujati občasno ocenjevanje uspešnosti neodvisnih organov ter biti dejavna pri ustanavljanju in krepitvi odborov za izvajanje v vseh regionalnih organizacijah za upravljanje ribištva, katerih pogodbenica je.
Reallocation should only occur once the relevant Member States have given up on their rights to exchange fishing opportunities among themselves, and should primarily be addressed in the context of SFPAs giving access to mixed fisheries.
Zlasti bi morala zagotoviti, da bi ti odbori za izvajanje opravljali splošni nadzor izvajanja zunanje ribiške politike in ukrepov, ki so jih sprejele regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva.
Where a third country is not party to an RFMO, the Union may endeavour to provide, with the third country with which an SFPA is being considered, for the allocation of a proportion of the sectoral support funding to facilitate the joining of that RFMO by the third country concerned.
Učinkovito upravljanje dogovorov o zakupu je pomembno za zagotovitev, da ne bi bila oslabljena učinkovitost ukrepov za ohranjanje in upravljanje, kot tudi za zagotovitev trajnostnega izkoriščanja živih morskih virov.
Fishing operations under the auspices of RFMOs and on the high seas should also be authorised by the flag Member State and comply with RFMO-specific rules or Union law governing fishing operations on the high seas.
Zato je treba vzpostaviti pravni okvir, ki Uniji pomaga bolje spremljati dejavnosti ribiških plovil Unije, ki so jih zakupili gospodarski subjekti tretjih držav ali Unije, na podlagi tega, kar je sprejela ustrezna regionalna organizacija za upravljanje ribištva.
In order to implement the Union’s international commitments in RFMOs and in accordance with the objectives referred to in Article 28 of the Basic Regulation, the Union should encourage periodic assessments of performance by independent bodies, and should play an active role in setting up and reinforcing implementation committees in all RFMOs to which it is a contracting party.
Za pretovarjanje na morju ni ustreznega nadzora države zastave ali obalne države, zato za gospodarske subjekte predstavlja način, kako prevažati nezakonit ulov.
It should in particular ensure that those implementation committees perform general supervision of the implementation of the external fisheries policy and of the measures decided within RFMOs.
Predhodno obvestilo o pretovarjanju plovil Unije, ki so lovila na odprtem morju in na podlagi neposrednih dovoljenj, bi moralo biti potrebno, kadar se pretovarjanje opravi zunaj pristanišča.
Effective management of chartering arrangements is important to ensure that the effectiveness of conservation and management measures is not undermined, as well as to ensure the sustainable exploitation of living marine resources.
Države članice bi morale Komisijo enkrat na leto obvestiti o vseh operacijah pretovarjanja, ki jih izvedejo njihova plovila.
It is therefore necessary to set out a legal framework that helps the Union to better monitor the activities of Union fishing vessels chartered by either a third country or by Union operators on the basis of what has been adopted by the relevant RFMO.
Postopki bi morali biti pregledni in predvidljivi za gospodarske subjekte Unije in tudi za gospodarske subjekte tretjih držav ter za njihove zadevne pristojne organe.
Transhipments at sea escape any proper control by flag or coastal states and therefore constitute a possible way for operators to carry illegal catch.
Med državami članicami in Komisijo bi bilo treba zagotoviti izmenjavo podatkov v elektronski obliki, kot določa uredba o nadzoru.
Transhipments by Union vessels on the high sea and under direct authorisations should be subject to prior notification when conducted outside port.
Države članice bi morale zbrati vse zahtevane podatke o svojih flotah in njihovih ribolovnih operacijah, te podatke upravljati ter jih dati na voljo Komisiji.
Member States should inform the Commission on all transhipment operations carried out by their vessels, once a year.
Poleg tega bi morale sodelovati med seboj, s Komisijo in kadar je to ustrezno s tretjimi državami, da bi uskladile te dejavnosti zbiranja podatkov.
Procedures should be transparent and predictable for Union and third-country operators, as well as for their respective competent authorities.
Da bi se izboljšali preglednost in dostopnost informacij o dovoljenjih Unije za ribolov, bi morala Komisija vzpostaviti elektronsko podatkovno bazo dovoljenj za ribolov, ki bi bila sestavljena iz javnega dela in zavarovanega dela.
The exchange of data in electronic form between Member States and the Commission, as provided for by the Control Regulation, should be ensured.
Informacije v podatkovni bazi dovoljenj za ribolov Unije vključujejo osebne podatke.
Member States should collect all requested data about their fleets and their fishing operations, manage those data and make them available to the Commission.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov na podlagi te uredbe bi morala biti v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10], Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES [11] ter veljavnim nacionalnim pravom.
Moreover, they should cooperate with each other, the Commission and third countries where relevant in order to coordinate those data collection activities.
Zaradi ustrezne obravnave dostopa ribiških plovil, ki plujejo pod zastavo tretje države, do voda Unije bi morala biti zadevna pravila skladna s pravili, ki na podlagi uredbe o nadzoru veljajo za ribiška plovila Unije.
With a view to improving the transparency and accessibility of information on Union fishing authorisations, the Commission should set up an electronic fishing authorisation database comprising both a public part and a secure part.
Zlasti člen 33 navedene uredbe o poročanju o ulovu in podatkih, povezanih z ulovom, bi moral veljati tudi za plovila tretjih držav, ki lovijo v vodah Unije.
Information in the Union fishing authorisation database includes personal data.
Ribiška plovila iz tretjih držav, ki nimajo dovoljenja na podlagi te uredbe, bi morala biti med plovbo v vodah Unije dolžna zagotoviti, da je njihovo ribolovno orodje nameščeno tako, da ga ni mogoče takoj uporabiti za ribolovne operacije.
The processing of personal data based on this Regulation should comply with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10], Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [11] and applicable national law.
Države članice bi morale biti odgovorne za nadzor nad ribolovnimi operacijami plovil tretjih držav v vodah Unije, v primeru kršitev pa za njihovo evidentiranje v nacionalnem registru iz člena 93 uredbe o nadzoru.
With a view to properly addressing access to Union waters of fishing vessels flying the flag of a third country, the relevant rules should be consistent with those applicable to Union fishing vessels, in accordance with the Control Regulation.
Plovila tretjih držav, ki lovijo na podlagi sporazumov o izmenjavi ali skupnem upravljanju, bi morala spoštovati kvote, ki jim jih za vode Unije dodelijo države njihove zastave.
In particular, Article 33 of that Regulation on the reporting of catch and catch-related data should also apply to third-country vessels fishing in Union waters.
Kadar plovila tretjih držav presežejo kvote, ki so jim bile dodeljene za staleže v vodah Unije, bi morala Komisija v naslednjih letih izvesti odbitke od kvot, dodeljenih tem tretjim državam.
Fishing vessels from third countries without authorisation under this Regulation should, when navigating in Union waters, be obliged to ensure that their fishing gear is installed in such a manner that it is not readily usable for fishing operations.
V teh primerih se odbitek kvot, ki ga v primeru prelova izvede Komisija, razume kot prispevek Komisije v okviru posvetovanj z obalnimi državami.
Member States should be responsible for controlling the fishing operations of third-country vessels in Union waters and, in the event of infringements, for recording them in the national register provided for in Article 93 of the Control Regulation.
Za poenostavitev postopkov izdaje dovoljenj bi morale države članice in Komisija uporabljati skupni sistem za izmenjavo in shranjevanje podatkov, ki bi omogočal zagotavljanje potrebnih informacij in njihovo posodobitev ter hkrati zmanjšal upravno breme.
Third-country fishing vessels fishing under agreements on exchange or joint management should respect the quotas allocated to them by their own flag states in Union waters.
Da bi se upoštevali tehnološki napredek in morebitne poznejše nove zahteve mednarodnega prava, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi s sprejemanjem sprememb priloge k tej uredbi, v katerih je naveden seznam informacij, ki jih mora gospodarski subjekt predložiti za pridobitev dovoljenja za ribolov ter v zvezi z dopolnjevanjem pogojev za izdajo dovoljenj za ribolov v členu 10, kolikor je potrebno, da bi bili v pravu Unije upoštevani izidi posvetovanj med Unijo in tretjimi državami, s katerimi je Unija sklenila sporazum, ali dogovori, sklenjeni z obalnimi državami, s katerimi Unija deli ribje staleže.
When third countries’ vessels overfish the quotas allocated to them for stocks in Union waters, the Commission should operate deductions from the quotas allocated to those third countries in subsequent years.
Zlasti je pomembno, da se Komisija pri svojem pripravljalnem delu ustrezno posvetuje, vključno na ravni strokovnjakov, in da se ta posvetovanja izvedejo v skladu z načeli, določenimi v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 13. aprila 2016 [12] o boljši pripravi zakonodaje.
In those cases, the deduction of quotas to be operated by the Commission in the case of overfishing is to be understood as the input that the Commission provides in the framework of the consultation with coastal states.
Za zagotovitev enakopravnega sodelovanja pri pripravi delegiranih aktov Evropski parlament in Svet zlasti prejmeta vse dokumente sočasno s strokovnjaki iz držav članic, njuni strokovnjaki pa se sistematično lahko udeležujejo sestankov strokovnih skupin Komisije, ki zadevajo pripravo delegiranih aktov.
In order to simplify authorisation procedures, a common system of data exchange and data storage should be used by the Member States and the Commission to provide necessary information and updates while minimising administrative burden.
Za zagotovitev enotnih pogojev izvajanja te uredbe bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila v zvezi z zapisovanjem, obliko in pošiljanjem podatkov, ki se nanašajo na dovoljenja za ribolov in jih države članice pošiljajo Komisiji ter v podatkovno bazo dovoljenj za ribolov Unije, ter tudi v zvezi z odločitvijo o začasnih ponovnih dodelitvah neizkoriščenih ribolovnih možnosti na podlagi veljavnih protokolov k sporazumom o partnerstvu o trajnostnem ribištvu kot začasnem ukrepu, ki ustreza členu 10 uredbe o dovoljenjih za ribolovne dejavnosti.
In order to take into account technological progress and subsequent possible new international law requirements, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the adoption of modifications to the Annex to this Regulation setting out the list of information to be provided by an operator in order to obtain a fishing authorisation, and in respect of supplementing the conditions for fishing authorisations in Article 10 to the extent necessary to reflect in Union law the outcome of the consultations between the Union and third countries with which the Union has concluded an agreement, or of arrangements with coastal states with which fish stocks are shared.
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13].
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making [12].
Da bi podatkovna baza dovoljenj za ribolov Unije postala operativna in da bi države članice izpolnile zahteve o tehničnem prenosu podatkov, bi morala Komisija zadevnim državam članicam zagotavljati tehnično pomoč, da bi lahko elektronsko pošiljale podatke.