natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where no multiannual plan, or no management plan in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006, is adopted for the fishery in question, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt, in accordance with Article 18 of this Regulation, delegated acts in accordance with Article 46 of this Regulation, laying down on a temporary basis specific discard plans containing the specifications referred to in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 5 of this Article for an initial period of no more than three years that may be renewed for a further total period of three years.
Kadar večletni načrt ali načrt upravljanja v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 1967/2006 za zadevni ribolov ni sprejet, se v skladu s členom 18 te uredbe na Komisijo prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 46 te uredbe, v katerih se določijo začasni posebni načrti o zavržkih, ki vsebujejo podrobnosti iz točk (a) do (e) odstavka 5 tega člena, za začetno obdobje največ treh let z možnostjo podaljšanja za nadaljnje skupno obdobje največ treh let.
Member States may cooperate, in accordance with Article 18 of this Regulation, in the drawing-up of such a plan with a view to the Commission adopting such acts or submitting a proposal in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure.’.
Države članice lahko v skladu s členom 18 te uredbe sodelujejo pri oblikovanju takih načrtov, da Komisija sprejme takšne akte ali predloži predlog v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom.“.
Done at Strasbourg, 15 November 2017.
V Strasbourgu, 15. novembra 2017
Opinion of 18 October 2017 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 18. oktobra 2017 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Position of the European Parliament of 24 October 2017 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 10 November 2017.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. oktobra 2017 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 10. novembra 2017.
Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC (OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 22).
Uredba (EU) št. 1380/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2013 o skupni ribiški politiki in o spremembi uredb Sveta (ES) št. 1954/2003 in (ES) št. 1224/2009 ter razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 in (ES) št. 639/2004 ter Sklepa Sveta 2004/585/ES (UL L 354, 28.12.2013, str. 22).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 of 21 December 2006 concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea, amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1626/94 (OJ L 409, 30.12.2006, p. 11).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1967/2006 z dne 21. decembra 2006 o ukrepih za upravljanje za trajnostno izkoriščanje ribolovnih virov v Sredozemskem morju, spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 2847/93 in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1626/94 (UL L 409, 30.12.2006, str. 11).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2093
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/2093
terminating the investigation concerning possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2011 on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the People's Republic of China by imports consigned from India, whether declared as originating in India or not, and terminating the registration of such imports imposed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/272
o zaključku preiskave glede morebitnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1331/2011 na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, z uvozom, poslanim iz Indije, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirane kot izdelki s poreklom iz Indije ali ne, in o zaključku registracije takega uvoza, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2017/272
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 13(3),
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2011 [2] (‘the original Regulation’), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 71,9 % on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel (‘SSSPT’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’) for all other companies than the ones mentioned in Article 1(2) and Annex I to that Regulation.
Svet je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1331/2011 [2] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 71,9 % na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) za vse druge družbe, ki niso navedene v členu 1(2) navedene uredbe in Prilogi I k njej.
These measures will be referred to as ‘the measures in force’ and the investigation that led to the measures imposed by the original Regulation will be referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Ti ukrepi so v nadaljnjem besedilu „veljavni ukrepi“, preiskava, ki je privedla do ukrepov, uvedenih s prvotno uredbo, pa je v nadaljnjem besedilu „prvotna preiskava“.
On 3 January 2017 the Defence Committee of the seamless stainless steel tubes industry of the European Union (‘the applicant’) submitted a request for an anti-circumvention investigation to the European Commission, indicating that the anti-dumping measures on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the PRC were being circumvented via India.
Zaščitni odbor industrije brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla Evropske unije („vložnik“) je 3. januarja 2017 Evropski komisiji predložil zahtevek za preiskavo proti izogibanju, v katerem je navedel, da prihaja do izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom na uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz LRK, in sicer prek Indije.
The request provided prima facie evidence that, following the imposition of the measures in force, a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC and India to the Union occurred, which seemed to be caused by the imposition of the measures in force.
V zahtevku so bili predloženi dokazi prima facie, iz katerih je razvidno, da se je po uvedbi veljavnih ukrepov znatno spremenil vzorec trgovanja, ki vključuje izvoz iz LRK in Indije v Unijo, in zdi se, da je to spremembo povzročila uvedba veljavnih ukrepov.
There was allegedly insufficient due cause or justification other than the imposition of the measures in force for such a change.
Za tako spremembo razen uvedbe veljavnih ukrepov domnevno ni zadostnih upravičenih razlogov ali utemeljitev.
The evidence showed that the increased imports from India were made at prices below the non-injurious price established in the original investigation.
Iz dokazov je razvidno, da se je povečani uvoz iz Indije izvajal po cenah, ki so nižje od neškodljive cene, določene v prvotni preiskavi.
Finally, there was evidence that SSSPT consigned from India were dumped in relation to the normal value established for the like product during the original investigation.
Dokazano je bilo tudi, da so bile cene brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla dampinške v primerjavi z normalno vrednostjo, določeno za podoben izdelek v prvotni preiskavi.
Having determined, after having informed the Member States, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation under Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated an investigation by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/272 [3] (‘the initiating Regulation’).
Ko je Evropska komisija („Komisija“), potem ko je obvestila države članice, ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi prima facie za začetek preiskave v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe, je začela preiskavo z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2017/272 [3] („uredba o začetku preiskave“).
Following Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the initiating Regulation also directed customs authorities in the Union to register imports of SSSPT consigned from India.
V skladu s členoma 13(3) in 14(5) osnovne uredbe je bilo z uredbo o začetku preiskave carinskim organom Unije tudi naročeno, naj registrirajo uvoz brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla v Unijo, poslanih iz Indije.
The Commission advised the authorities of the PRC and India, the exporting producers and traders in those countries, the importers in the Union known to be concerned and the Union industry of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave obvestila organe LRK in Indije, proizvajalce izvoznike in trgovce v navedenih državah, uvoznike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter industrijo Unije.
Questionnaires were sent to the producers/exporters in the PRC and India known to the Commission or which made themselves known within the deadlines specified in recital 15 of the initiating Regulation.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v LRK in Indiji, ki so bili Komisiji znani ali ki so se sami javili v rokih iz uvodne izjave 15 uredbe o začetku preiskave.
Several hearings with the applicant took place, including one hearing with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Z vložnikom je potekalo več zaslišanj, vključno z enim zaslišanjem pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih.
Twenty nine companies from India, one company from the PRC, nine unrelated importers, two related importers, one agent and five Union industry producers made themselves known.
Javilo se je 29 družb iz Indije, ena družba iz LRK, devet nepovezanih uvoznikov, dva povezana uvoznika, en zastopnik in pet proizvajalcev industrije Unije.
Twenty one Indian companies submitted a questionnaire reply and requested an exemption from the possible extended measures, in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ostalih 21 indijskih družb je predložilo izpolnjen vprašalnik in zaprosilo za izvzetje iz morebitnih razširjenih ukrepov v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission individually examined all exemption requests.
Komisija je posamično preučila vse zahtevke za izvzetje.
Verification visits were carried out at fourteen companies which were either significant exporters to the Union or which based on an initial analysis of their reply fulfilled the conditions under Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation to be eligible for a potential exemption.
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni pri 14 družbah, ki so bile pomembnejši izvozniki v Unijo ali ki so na podlagi prve analize njihovega odgovora izpolnjevale pogoje iz člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe za upravičenost do morebitnega izvzetja.
Four unrelated importers in the Union and one Chinese exporting producer unrelated to any of the Indian producers provided questionnaire replies.
Štirje nepovezani uvozniki v Uniji in en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, ki ni povezan z nobenim indijskim proizvajalcem, so predložili izpolnjene vprašalnike.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies in India:
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih družb v Indiji:
Investigation period
Za ta izdelek se uporabljajo trenutno veljavni ukrepi.
The investigation period covered the period from 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2016 (‘the investigation period’).
Izdelek v preiskavi je enak „zadevnemu izdelku“, le da je poslan iz Indije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Indije ali ne, ki se trenutno uvršča pod iste oznake KN kot zadevni izdelek.
For the period of 1 October 2015 to 30 September 2016 (‘the reporting period’) more detailed data were collected in order to examine the possible undermining of the remedial effect of the measures in force and existence of dumping.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, izvožene v Unijo iz LRK, in brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, poslane v Unijo iz Indije, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter enake uporabe, zato se štejejo za podobna izdelka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION
Stopnja sodelovanja
General considerations
Stopnja sodelovanja indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bila zelo visoka.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of circumvention was made by analysing successively whether:
21 sodelujočih proizvajalcev je predstavljalo 92 % celotnega uvoza brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla iz Indije v Unijo v obdobju poročanja.
there was a change in the pattern of trade between third countries (India and the PRC) and the Union,
14 preverjenih družb je predstavljalo 91 % celotnega izvoza sodelujočih družb in 84 % celotnega uvoza brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla iz Indije v Unijo.
this change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty,
Člen 18(1) osnovne uredbe se je uporabil za enega sodelujočega indijskega proizvajalca izvoznika, saj ni predložil informacij, potrebnih za smiselno oceno dejavnosti njegovih povezanih družb.
there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the like product, and
Zato so bila uporabljena najboljša razpoložljiva dejstva za dopolnitev podatkov, ki jih je predložila ta družba, da je Komisija dobila zanesljive podatke, potrebne za oceno njenega uvoza in izvoza v Unijo.
there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the like product, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja sodelovanja proizvajalcev/izvoznikov iz LRK je bila nizka, saj je le eden vrnil izpolnjen vprašalnik.
Product concerned and the like product
Zato je bilo treba ugotovitve v zvezi z izvozom brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla iz LRK v Unijo in iz LRK v Indijo oblikovati na podlagi podatkov Eurostata in kitajske trgovinske statistike.
The product concerned by the possible circumvention is ‘SSSPT’: certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel (excluding such pipes and tubes with attached fittings suitable for conducting gases or liquids for use in civil aircraft) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the product concerned’).
Narava domnevnih praks, postopkov ali dejavnosti izogibanja
It is currently falling within CN codes ex73041100, ex73042200, ex73042400, ex73044100, ex73044910, ex73044993, ex73044995, ex73044999 and ex73049000.
Domnevna praksa izogibanja, kot je opisana v zahtevku, izhaja iz proizvodnega postopka.
This is the product to which the measures that are currently in force apply.
Obstajata dve glavni fazi proizvodnje brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, in sicer vroče in hladno oblikovanje.
The product under investigation is the same as the ‘product concerned’ defined in the previous recital, but consigned from India, whether declared as originating in India or not, currently falling within the same CN codes as the product concerned.
Obstajata dva splošna načina za uresničitev prve faze, tj. vročega oblikovanja, in sicer uporaba postopka vročega ekstrudiranja ali vročega prediranja.
The investigation showed that SSSPT exported to the Union from the PRC and SSSPT consigned from India to the Union have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same uses, and are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Nastale vroče oblikovane cevi so vmesni izdelek, ki zahteva nadaljnjo obdelavo pred njegovo končno uporabo, z izjemo nekaterih vroče oblikovanih cevi, proizvedenih z uporabo postopka vročega ekstrudiranja.
Level of cooperation
Vložnik je trdil, da so bile brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, izvožene iz LRK v Indijo, že hladno oblikovane cevi.
There was a very high level of cooperation from Indian exporting producers.
To trditev sta podprli kitajska izvozna statistika in predpostavka, da proizvajalci v LRK uporabljajo postopek vročega prediranja, po katerem je treba cevi takoj in obvezno hladno obdelati.
The 21 cooperating producers accounted for 92 % of total SSSPT imports from India to the Union in the reporting period.
Medtem ko je kitajska izvozna statistika res pokazala, da so bile skoraj vse izvožene brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla deklarirane kot hladno oblikovane, je bilo ob uvozu v Indijo samo 2 % deklariranih kot hladno oblikovanih.
The fourteen verified companies represented 91 % of the total exports of the cooperating companies and 84 % of the total imports of SSSPT from India into the Union.
Razliko je mogoče pojasniti s shemo vračila DDV, ki se uporablja v LRK, kjer imajo hladno oblikovane brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla koristi od 13-odstotnega vračila DDV v primerjavi z 9-odstotnim vračilom za vroče oblikovane cevi.
Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation was applied to one cooperating Indian exporting producer to the extent that it did not provide the information necessary to meaningfully assess the activities of its related companies.
Preverjanja so potrdila, da so indijski proizvajalci kupovali skoraj izključno vroče oblikovane cevi in izvajali hladno oblikovanje v Indiji.
Thus, best facts available were used to supplement the data provided by this company so that the Commission had the reliable data needed for assessing its imports and exports to the Union.
Preiskava je potrdila tudi, da je mogoče vroče oblikovane cevi zlahka prevažati pred izvedbo hladnega oblikovanja.
In the PRC there was a low level of cooperation by producers/exporters, with only one exporting producer submitting a questionnaire reply.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da je hladno oblikovanje, izvedeno v Indiji, znatno preoblikovalo izdelek in nepopravljivo spremenilo njegove bistvene lastnosti.
Therefore findings in respect of SSSPT exports from the PRC to the Union, and from the PRC to India, had to be made on the basis of Eurostat data and Chinese trade statistics.
Med tem postopkom se spremenijo mere izdelka ter njegove fizikalne, mehanske in metalurške lastnosti.
Nature of the alleged circumvention practice, process or work
Sprememba vzorca trgovanja
The alleged circumvention practice as described in the request goes back to the production process.
Preglednica 1 prikazuje razvoj uvoza brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla v Unijo iz LRK in Indije ter razvoj indijskega uvoza iz LRK v obdobju preiskave:
There are two major production stages of the SSSPT: hot forming and cold forming.
Preglednica 1
There are two common ways of achieving the first, hot formed stage: either using a hot extrusion process or a hot piercing process.
Uvoz brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla v obdobju preiskave (v metričnih tonah)
The resulting hot formed tube is an intermediary product, which requires further processing before its final use, with the exception of some hot formed tubes manufactured using the hot extrusion process.
Vir: Eurostat (COMEXT), kitajska trgovinska statistika.
The applicant claimed that the SSSPT exported by the PRC to India were already cold formed tubes.
Koledarsko leto
This assertion was supported by the Chinese export statistics and by the assumption that producers in the PRC use a hot piercing process after which the tubes must be immediately and mandatorily cold processed.
Obdobje poročanja
Whilst indeed the Chinese export statistics showed that almost all exported SSSPT were declared as cold formed, upon the import into India only 2 % were declared as cold formed.
Uvoz v Unijo iz LRK
The discrepancy can be explained by the VAT refund scheme applied by the PRC, where the cold formed SSSPT benefit from a 13 % VAT refund compared to a 9 % refund for the hot formed tubes.
Uvoz v Unijo iz Indije
The verifications confirmed that the Indian producers had almost exclusively purchased hot formed tubes and carried out the cold forming in India.
Kitajski izvoz v Indijo
The investigation also confirmed that hot formed tubes can be easily transported before undergoing cold forming.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v Unijo se je v obdobju preiskave znatno zmanjšal, kar kaže na močno zmanjšanje po uvedbi veljavnih ukrepov v letu 2011.
The investigation further showed that the cold forming performed in India substantially transforms the product and irreversibly alters its essential characteristics.
To zmanjšanje uvoza iz LRK po uvedbi ukrepov se je postopoma izravnalo s povečanjem uvoza iz Indije v naslednjih letih.
During the process the product changes its dimensions and its physical, mechanical and metallurgical properties.
Te spremembe v trgovinskih tokovih pomenijo spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja med navedenima državama in Unijo.
Change in the pattern of trade
Hitrost razvoja indijskega uvoza iz LRK se je v obdobju preiskave stalno povečevala, tako da je največji del povečanja nastal že pred uvedbo ukrepov.
Table 1 shows the development of SSSPT imports from the PRC and India into the Union and the development of Indian imports from the PRC in the investigation period:
Navedeni podatki kažejo, da je po začetku prvotne preiskave leta 2010 in uvedbi veljavnih ukrepov decembra 2011 uvoz brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla iz Indije v veliki meri nadomestil uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v Unijo.
Table 1
Nezadosten vzrok ali gospodarska upravičenost, z izjemo uvedbe protidampinške dajatve
Imports of SSSPT in the investigation period (metric tonnes)
Komisija je preučila, ali je glede na trditve do navedene spremembe vzorca trgovanja prišlo zaradi prakse, postopka ali dejavnosti, za katere razen uvedbe dajatve ni zadostnega vzroka ali gospodarske upravičenosti.
Source: Eurostat (Comext), Chinese trade statistics
Analiza uvoza v Indijo iz LRK
Calendar year
Naslednja preglednica prikazuje uvoz indijskih sodelujočih družb iz LRK v primerjavi z njihovo celotno prodajo in izvozom v Unijo.
Reporting Period
Komisija ugotavlja, da navedeni podatki zadevajo družbe, ki predstavljajo veliko večino indijskega izvoza brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla v Unijo, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 21.
Union imports from the PRC
Komisija je zato menila, da ti podatki v zadostni meri predstavljajo zadevno indijsko industrijo glede izvoza v Unijo.
Union imports from India
Preglednica 2
Chinese exports to India
Indijski uvoz iz LRK (sodelujoče družbe) glede na skupno prodajo v Indiji (v metričnih tonah)
The imports of the product concerned from the PRC to the Union substantially decreased over the investigation period, showing a steep decrease after the imposition of measures in force in 2011.
Vir: Izpolnjeni vprašalniki sodelujočih družb.
This decrease in the imports from the PRC following the imposition of the measures was steadily absorbed by the increase of imports from India in the subsequent years.
Proračunsko leto v Indiji
These changes in trade flows constitute a change in the pattern of trade between the above mentioned countries and the Union.
Skupna prodaja v Indiji (A)
The development of Indian imports from the PRC increased at a stable pace over the investigation period, showing the bulk of the increase already before the imposition of the measures.
Indijski uvoz iz LRK (B)
The data above shows that after the initiation of the original investigation in 2010, and the imposition of the measures in force in December 2011, imports of SSSPT from India have to a large extent replaced the imports of the product concerned from the PRC to the Union.
Delež indijskega uvoza iz LRK / skupna prodaja v Indiji (C = B / A)
Insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty
Indijski izvoz v Unijo (D)