natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The contracts concluded between Hidroelectrica and ArcelorMittal, Alpiq RomEnergie, Alpiq RomIndustries, EFT, Electrica, Electromagnetica, Energy Holding, Euro-Pec, Luxten-Lighting, Electrocarbon and Elsid, and the contract with Alro, do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Dve pogodbi s podjetjem Arcelor Mittal.
Article 2
Dve pogodbi s podjetjem Electrica.
This Decision is addressed to Romania.
Pogodbo s podjetjem Luxten-Lighting (dobavitelj električne energije) je odpovedal Luxten-Lighting z obvestilom z dne 15. novembra 2011, z začetkom veljavnosti 1. januarja 2012.
Done at Brussels, 12 June 2015.
Pogodbe s podjetjema Electrocarbon in Elsid so prenehale veljati 13. marca 2013 in pogodba s podjetjem Electromagnetica (dobavitelj električne energije) se je iztekla 30. aprila 2014.
For the Commission
Dodatek 1 k pogodbi s podjetjem Electrocarbon je zagotovil vnaprej določeno ceno (v fiksnem znesku – isto ceno) do 28. februarja 2008; Dodatek 2 k pogodbi s podjetjem Elsid je zagotovil vnaprej določeno ceno do 31. decembra 2007.
Member of the Commission
1. julija 2004 so se pogodbene stranke sporazumele o preglednici z letno fiksno ceno za obdobje 2006–2013 (tj. Dodatek 4 k pogodbi s podjetjem Electrocarbon in Dodatek 5 k pogodbi s podjetjem Elsid).
Commission Decision C(2012) 2516 final of 25 April 2012 concerning case SA.33623 (OJ C 189, 29.6.2012, p. 3).
Cene so bile pozneje spremenjene z dnem 1. januar 2005 z vnaprej določenimi cenami v fiksnem znesku do 31. decembra 2007 za Elsid in do 28. februarja 2008 za Electrocarbon.
Commission Decision C(2012) 2517 final of 25 April 2012 concerning case SA.33624 (OJ C 268, 5.9.2012, p. 21).
Od leta 2006 so se pogodbene cene za Electrocarbon in Elsid prilagodile letno.
Commission Decision C(2012) 2542 final of 25 April 2012 concerning case SA.33451 (OJ C 395, 20.12.2012, p. 5).
Sodišče prve stopnje: Olt Tribunal – dokument 2800/104/2010 (Electrocarbon) in Dambovita Tribunal – Zadeva 4102/120/2010 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „Elsid“).
Commission Decision C(2012) 2556 final of 25 April 2012 concerning case SA.33581 (OJ C 395, 20.12.2012, p. 34).
Člen 10(2) vsake od teh treh pogodb.
OJ L 115, 9.5.2008, p. 92.
Člen 10(1) vsake od teh treh pogodb.
Case SA.33623 (OJ C 189, 29.6.2012, p. 3); case SA.33624 (OJ C 268, 5.9.2012, p. 21); case SA.33451 (OJ C 395, 20.12.2012, p. 5) and case SA.33581 (OJ C 395, 20.12.2012, p. 34).
Člen 55, odstavek 1 Zakona o električni energiji in plinu št. 123/2012, kakor je bilo nadalje spremenjeno z Zakonom št. 127/2014.
Including the preliminary observations submitted by Luxten-Lighting and Euro-Pec before publication of the invitation to provide comments on the opening decision: Luxten-Lighting on 14 August 2012 and Euro-Pec on 13 August 2012.
Poročilo družbe KPMG, Priloga 3 k Memorandumu o podjetju Energy Holdings (poročilo z dne 27. februarja 2012, str. 8), vir: Letna poročila podjetja Hidroelectrica, poročilo upravitelja 2010, KPMG analiza.
All members of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors except the General Director of Hidroelectrica and the representative of Fondul Proprietatea (2010), cumulated other functions in various Ministries and were appointed through Orders issued by the Ministry of Economy and Trade, as follows: (i) in 2005-2006: the personal adviser in the cabinet of the Minister of Economy and Trade; the director of cabinet of the Minister for Small and Medium Enterprises; the personal adviser in the cabinet of the Minister in the Ministry of Public Finance and the personal adviser in the General Secretariat of the Government were members of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors; (ii) in 2007-2008 — situation unknown; (iii) in 2009: the State Secretary in the Ministry of Economy and Trade was also the President of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors (2009), while another State Secretary in the Ministry of Public Finance and two general directors in the Ministry of Economy and Trade were also members of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors; (iv) in 2010: three personal advisers in the Ministry of Economy and Trade, a State Secretary in the Ministry of Finance and a General Director in the Ministry of Economy and Trade were members of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors.
poročilo KPMG, Priloga 3 k Memorandumu o podjetju Energy Holdings z dne 27. februarja 2012, str. 21, vir: ANRE.
See International Energy Agency: ‘Projected costs of generating electricity’ 2010 edition, Section 4.2 ‘Country by country data on electricity generating costs’, p. 89.
Poslovna skrivnost.
Decision of Tribunal of Bucharest No 22456/3/2012 dated 26 June 2012.
Odločba Komisije z dne 5. marca 2014, na podlagi uporabe člena 102 PDEU, nalaga globe v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 v zadevi AT.39984 „Romunska energetska borza/OPCOM“.
Decision of Tribunal of Bucharest No 6482 dated 26 June 2013.
Seznam kupcev iz tabele 1 Priloge II.
Available in Romanian only at http://www.euroinsol.eu/uploads/Raport%2059%20Hidro%20v11.pdf
Nekateri dobavitelji električne energije (tj.: Alpiq RomIndustries, EFT, Alro Electrocarbon in Elsid).
Electrica concluded two short-term contracts with Hidroelectrica.
En dobavitelj električne energije (EFT) in Alro.
Contract with Alpiq RomEnergie; two contracts with Electrica; and two contracts with ArcelorMittal.
Samo v primeru podjetja Alro.
Five contracts with electricity traders (Alpiq RomIndustries; Electromagnetica; Energy Holding; Euro-Pec; Luxten-Lighting).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
Contracts with EFT (electricity trader) and Alro.
V nasprotju z madžarskimi preferenčnimi cenami električne energije v zadevah T-80/06 in T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü proti Komisiji (ECLI:EU:T:2012:65).
Contracts with Electrocarbon and Elsid.
Alpiq RomIndustries in Alpiq RomEnergie.
Two contracts with Arcelor Mittal.
Sodba v zadevi C-482/99, Francoska republika proti Komisiji (Stardust Marine), Recueil 2002, str.
Two contracts with Electrica.
I-4397.
The contract with Luxten-Lighting (electricity trader) was terminated by Luxten-Lighting by notice dated 15 November 2011, with effect from 1 January 2012.
AlpiqRomEnergie, AlpiqRomIndustrie, Electromagnetica, Energy Holding, Electrocarbon in Elsid, ArcelorMittal in Alro.
Contracts with Electrocarbon and Elsid expired on 13 March 2013 and the contract with Electromagnetica (electricity trader) expired on 30 April 2014.
Energy Holding, dobavitelj električne energije.
Addendum 1 to the contract with Electrocarbon provided for a pre-set price (at a fixed amount — the same price) until 28 February 2008; Addendum 2 to the contract with Elsid provided for a pre-set price until 31 December 2007.
EFT, Electromagnetica, Luxten-Lighting in Energy Holding.
On 1 July 2004 the parties agreed on a table pre-setting a per year fixed price for the period 2006-2013 (i.e.: Addendum 4 to the contract with Electrocarbon and Addendum 5 to the contract with Elsid).
EFT, Electromagnetica, Luxten-Lighting in Alro.
The prices were subsequently modified on 1 January 2005 with prices pre-set at a fixed amount until 31 December 2007 for Elsid and until 28 February 2008, for Electrocarbon.
EFT, Luxten-Lighting, Electrocarbon in Elsid.
As of 2006 the contract prices were readjusted yearly for Electrocarbon and Elsid.
Alpiq RomEnergy in Alpiq RomIndustries.
Court of first instance: Olt Tribunal — File 2800/104/2010 (Electrocarbon) and Dambovita Tribunal — File 4102/120/2010 (Elsid).
Združeni zadevi T-80/06 in T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü proti Komisiji, točke od 50 do 62.
Article 10(2) of each of the three contracts.
UL L 157, 21.6.2005, str. 96.
Article 10(1) of each of the three contracts.
Glej sodno prakso v opombi 39, točke od 69 do 89.
Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Electricity and Gas Law No 123/2012 as further amended by Law No 127/2014.
Sklep Komisije 2014/456/EU z dne 4. februarja 2014 o španskih tarifah električne energije: odjemalci Državna pomoč SA.21817 (C 3/07) (ex NN 66/06), ki jo je odobrila Španija (UL L 205, 12.7.2014, str. 25), uvodne izjave 113 do 120.
KPMG Report, Annex 3 to Memorandum of Energy Holdings dated 27 February 2012, p. 8, source: Hidroelectrica's Annual Reports, 2010 Administrator's Report, KPMG Analysis.
Združeni zadevi T-80/06 in T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü proti Komisiji, odstavki 104–114.
KPMG report, Annex 3 to the Memorandum of Energy Holdings dated 27 February 2012, p. 21, source: ANRE.
Ponudba podjetja ArcelorMittal je bila prodana na dražbi podjetju Hidroelectrica 23. decembra 2009, medtem ko je Energy Holding umaknil ponudbo 22. decembra 2009.
Business secret.
Navedeni vzporedni ponudbi podjetij Arelco in Petroped sta bili umaknjeni 20. oziroma 30. decembra 2010.
Commission Decision of 5 March 2014, in application of Article 102 TFEU imposing fines pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in case AT.39 984 ‘Romanian Power Exchange/OPCOM’.
Glej Prilogo I k temu sklepu.
The dataset used for benchmarking included 114 observations, covering the period 2007-2010.
Sodba v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji (Stardust Marine), C-482/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294, točke 51 do 58.
The dataset included the following information: the identity of the seller and the buyer, the type of contract, the date of entry into force and the expiry date, as well as the quantity, profile of supply and the weighted average price for each year from 2007 to 2013.
Glej opombo 59.
The list of buyers is provided in Annex II, Table 1.
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/1877 z dne 20. aprila 2015 o cenah, ki jih je podjetje S.C.
Certain electricity traders (i.e.: Alpiq RomIndustries, EFT, Alro Electrocarbon and Elsid).
Hidroelectrica S.A. iz Romunije zaračunalo podjetjema S.C.
One electricity trader (EFT) and Alro.
Termoelectrica S.A. in S.C.
Only in the case of Alro.
Electrocentrale Deva S.A. – SA.33475 (12/C) (UL L 275, 20.10.2015, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1).
46), uvodne izjave 96 do 100.
Contrary to the Hungarian preferential electricity tariffs cases — T-80/06 and T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü v Commission (ECLI:EU:T:2012:65).
PRILOGA I
For further reference please see the ANRE Annual Monitoring Report for 2007 and for the following years.
PREGLED POGODB
Alpiq RomIndustries and Alpiq RomEnergie.
TRGOVCI Z ELEKTRIČNO ENERGIJO
Case C-482/99 French Republic v Commission (Stardust Marine) [2002] ECR I-4397.
Datum podpisa in trajanje pogodbe (začetno obdobje / po podaljšanju roka)
Alpiq RomEnergie, Alpiq RomIndustrie, Electromagnetica, Energy Holding, Electrocarbon and Elsid, ArcelorMittal and Alro.
Datum prenehanja veljavnosti
Energy Holding, an electricity trader.
Količina
EFT, Electromagnetica, Luxten-Lighting and Energy Holding.
Cena (RON/MWh)
EFT, Electromagnetica, Luxten-Lighting and Alro.
Začetno obdobje: 5 let
EFT, Luxten-Lighting, Electrocarbon and Elsid.
Podaljšanje (2009): za dodatnih 5 let (do leta 2018)
Alpiq RomEnergy and Alpiq RomIndustries.
Začetno obdobje: 10 let
Joined Cases T-80/06 and T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü v European Commission, paragraphs 50 to 62.
Podaljšanje (2009): za dodatnih 5 let (do konca leta 2019)
OJ L 157, 21.6.2005, p. 96.
Začetna količina: 1 GWh
Commission Decision 2014/456/EU of 4 February 2014 on State aid No SA.21817 (C 3/07) (ex NN 66/06 implemented by Spain, Spanish Electricity Tariffs: consumers (OJ L 205, 12.7.2014, p. 25), recitals 113 to 120.
Podaljšanje (2010): za dodatnih 5 let (do konca leta 2015)
Joined Cases T-80/06 and T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü v European Commission, paragraphs 104-114.
Začetna količina (2006): […] GWh
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1877 of 20 April 2015 on tariffs charged by S.C.
[…] GWh od oktobra do decembra 2010
Hidroelectrica SA of Romania to S.C.
Začetna količina: […] GWh
Termoelectrica SA and S.C.
Začetna količina: 3692 GWh
ANNEX I
polovica 2008: […] GWh
OVERVIEW OF THE CONTRACTS
PROIZVAJALCI ELEKTROD
Date of signature and contract period (initial period/after extension of period)
3.2013)
Quantity
Začetna količina: 280 GWh
Price (RON/MWh)
Datum podpisa in trajanje pogodbe (začetno obdobje / po podaljšanju dobe (če se uporablja))
3 April 2008
Podaljšanje (2010): za dodatnih 5 let (do 31.1.2018)
Prolongation (2009): by 5 additional years (until 2018)
Obdobje: 1 leto
2008: […] GWh
OCENA DOMNEVNIH GOSPODARSKIH PREDNOSTI – EKONOMETRIČNA ANALIZA
2009: […] GWh
Utemeljitev in opis ekonometrične analize
Initial period: 10 years
V prvi fazi regresijska analiza omogoča vzpostavitev referenčne cene na podlagi pogodbenih značilnosti v nizu podatkov (v nadaljevanju besedila: napovedi znotraj vzorca).
25 March 2004
Spremenljivki „trajanje pogodbe“ in „profil odjema kupca“ nista vključeni, ker nista statistično pomembni.
Initial period: 7 years
Ekonometrična analiza temelji na načelu, da obstaja več dejavnikov za oblikovanje cen, kot na primer količine.
Prolongation (2010): by 5 additional years (until end of 2015)
Zato bi bilo zavajajoče primerjati cene različnih pogodb brez upoštevanja teh dejavnikov.
Contract 112: 14 September 2010
Namesto tega je bilo mogoče ugotoviti, da teh dveh pogodb preprosto ni mogoče primerjati z drugimi tržnimi pogodbami.
31 July 2011
Ker normalizacija ne obstaja, je mogoče smiselno primerjati le popolnoma enake pogodbe.
31 December 2010
Na primer, pri ocenjevanju vzročnega odnosa med nekaterimi dejavniki in cenami bi bilo treba upoštevati tveganje endogenosti: to je da je vzročna spremenljivka (npr. količina) lahko sama po sebi pod vplivom razložene spremenljivke (npr. cena), in sicer zaradi izpuščenih spremenljivk ali simultane pristranskosti.
[…] GWh from October to December 2010
Ta normalizacija je potrebna zaradi neobstoja popolnoma enakih pogodb in značilnosti dobav.
21 April 2004
Regresijska analiza izraža glavne značilnosti zadevnih dvostranskih pogodb:
Initial quantity: […] GWh
tudi identiteta dobavitelja kaže, da imajo nekateri dobavitelji značilnosti, ki bi jim omogočale, da cene določajo drugače kot drugi, ob upoštevanju pogodb o dobavi električne energije s skoraj vsemi dobavitelji, ki so dejavni v Romuniji in so vključeni v nizu podatkov;
14 January 2004
zajema tudi navidezna leta, ki izražajo časovno razsežnost in morebitne spremembe v tržnih pogojih med obema letoma.
Initial quantity: 3692 GWh
Kar zadeva drugo fazo empirične analize, je Komisija ugotovila referenčne vrednosti za vsako leto in nato preskusila položaj pogodb glede na to referenčno vrednost, da bi ugotovila, ali so bile cene, ki jih zaračunava podjetje Hidroelectrica, nižje ali višje kot modelirana referenčna cena.
26 June 2012
Obstajajo razlogi, čeprav zelo konservativni, za izbiro NNO-pogodbe, ki vključuje variacijsko nihanje pod osrednjo ocenjeno vrednostjo referenčne cene.
2 March 2004
Prvič, ekonometrični model ne pojasnjuje popolnoma opazovane cene v nizu podatkov, ter samo ena ocena referenčne cene je bila zagotovljena z intervalom zaupanja in stopnjo napake, ki je višja ali nižja od predvidenih.
December 2011
Drugič, na realnem trgu obstajajo odstopanja od samo ene mogoče cene; NNO-pogodba, ki izhaja iz pogodbe, temelječe na tržnih pogojih (glej uvodne izjave 36 do 38), zagotavlja količinsko opredeljene informacije o mogočem obsegu takih odstopanj in tržno zasnovan obseg za izračun referenčnih cen.
ELECTRODES PRODUCERS
Tretjič, razlika v ceni v povezavi z NNO-pogodbo se uporablja za ločevanje pogodb, katerih cene so pod referenčnimi cenami pogodb, ki presegajo te:
28 March 2003
če ima pogodba opazovano ceno, ki presega ustrezno referenčno ceno, in če je razlika v ceni te pogodbe višja od razlike v NNO-ceni, se šteje, da ta pogodba prima facie ni skladna s trgom;
Prolongation (2004): by 5 additional years (until 31 March 2013)
sicer se pogodba šteje za skladno s trgom.
31 March 2013
V spodnji preglednici so predstavljeni podrobni rezultati regresijske analize vzorca pogodb iz podatkovnega niza.
Initial quantity: 800 GWh
Regresija pojasnjuje 74-odstotno razliko v podatkih, ki pa je še vedno sprejemljiva.
18 December 2002
Ocene koeficienta, predstavljene v spodnji preglednici, se uporabljajo v drugi fazi za napoved „referenčnih“ cen za vzorce pogodb v preiskavi (v nadaljevanju besedila: napovedi zunaj vzorca).
Initial quantity: 280 GWh
Rezultati ekonometrične analize
Date of signature and contract period (initial period/after extension of period (if applicable))
Tabela 1
8 September 2005
Regresijska analiza [2]Opomba: Cene so v RON/MWh
Prolongation (2010): by 5 additional years (until 31 January 2018)
Vir: Regresijska analiza, ki jo je Komisija izvedla na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih predložili romunski organi.
Ongoing until end of 2018
Odvisna spremenljivka: povprečna cena
23 December 2009
Koeficient
Period: 1 year
STD-napaka
22 December 2010
letna količina (GWh)
6 January 2012
leto 2008
[…] GWh
leto 2009
ANNEX II
leto 2010
ASSESSMENT OF THE ALLEGED ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE — ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS
0(izpuščeno)
Rationale and description of the econometric analysis
konstanta
The econometric analysis undertaken by the Commission is designed to create benchmark prices for contracts.
število opazovanj: 109
These prices result from a regression analysis carried out on the features of the contracts in the dataset.
R-kvadrat = 0,7426
As a first step, the regression analysis allows a benchmark price to be constructed on the basis of the characteristics of the contracts in the dataset (‘in-sample predictions’).
prilagojen R-kvadrat = 0,6691
As a second step, the results of the regression analysis are used to predict a benchmark price for the contracts investigated, taking into account the characteristics of the contracts (‘out-of-sample predictions’).
Naslednje razpredelnice prikazujejo rezultate empirične analize, pri čemer je bila uporabljena regresijska analiza iz preglednice 1.
In the regression analysis, the variation in prices among the contracts in the dataset is explained with reference to the following characteristics: quantity purchased, supplier identity and year dummies.
Za vsako leto je bila izbrana najbolj navzdol odstopajoča pogodba („most-downward-diverging contract“; v nadaljevanju besedila: NNO-pogodba) na podlagi razlike v ceni (v RON/MWh) med ocenjeno ceno vsake pogodbe in ustrezno opazovano ceno.
The ‘contract duration’ and ‘buyer off-take profile’ variables are not included since they are not statistically significant.
Preglednice od 2 do 4 prikazujejo razlike med pogodbenimi cenami podjetja Hidroelectrica za posamezno leto (to je 2007–2010) v primerjavi s „simulirano“ referenčno ceno za vse pogodbe v preiskavi.
The econometric analysis rests on the principle that there are a number of drivers of prices, such as quantities.
Za leto 2007 ima NNO-pogodba, to je pogodba iz nesumljivega niza podatkov z največjo razliko med opazovano ceno in ustrezno ocenjeno ceno, razliko v ceni, ocenjeno na […] RON/MWh.
It would be misleading to compare the prices across different contracts without considering these drivers.
Pogodbi podjetja Hidroelectrica imata opazovano ceno pod svojo ocenjeno ceno z razliko v ceni, ki je večja od […] RON/MWh, in sicer pogodbi s podjetjema Electrocarbon in Elsid, v katerih opazovana razlika v ceni znaša približno […] RON/MWh (glej preglednico 2).
In particular, whereas the contracts in the dataset have certain characteristics in common with the contracts under investigation (bilateral negotiation, bespoke conditions, quantities above 150 GWh per year, etc.), no contract in the dataset has exactly the same quantities, or was concluded for the same duration and with the same entry into force, as the contracts under investigation — a factor that may justify price differences.
Tabela 2
For example, two contracts under investigation concern supplies of […] GWh/year (Alro 2007-2010) and […] GWh/year (Energy Holding 2007-2008).
Analiza pogodb iz leta 2007
In the meantime, the contract with the highest quantity in the dataset out of the 114 price/contract data observed between 2007 and 2010 did not exceed 1400 GWh/year.
Opomba: Cene se zaokrožijo navzgor na najbližji RON/MWh.
It is doubtful whether a mere comparison of prices for these contracts could allow any valid conclusion to be drawn as to whether the contracts under investigation were in line with market prices.
Vir: Izračuni temeljijo na regresijski analizi in podatkih, ki so jih predložili romunski organi.
Alternatively, it could be concluded that these two contracts could not simply be compared with other market contracts.
Ime kupca
The rationale of this quantitative exercise is therefore that, once a number of external factors are taken into account, the prices across different contracts can be better compared.
Ime dobavitelja
In the absence of normalisation, only perfectly identical contracts could be compared meaningfully.
Opazovana cena
It should be noted that this empirical exercise is not aimed at estimating a causal relationship between prices and certain external factors.
Referenčna cena
For example, estimating a causal relationship between certain factors and prices would require the risk of endogeneity to be taken into consideration: that is, the risk that a causal variable (e.g. the quantities) might itself be influenced by the explained variable (e.g. the price), due to omitted variables or simultaneity bias.
Razlika v ceni (v absolutnem smislu)
The purpose of the quantitative exercise is to ‘normalise’ the prices across different contracts to enable a better comparison to be made between them.
V skladu z referenčnimi indeksi
This normalisation is necessary in the absence of perfectly identical contracts and supply characteristics.
NNO-pogodba v nizu podatkov
The regression analysis reflects the main features of the bilateral contracts at issue:
Pogodbe v preiskavi
including the quantity variable in the regression reflects the fact that prices are in general lower when quantities purchased are higher [1],
Za leto 2008 je razlika v ceni v povezavi z NNO-pogodbo ocenjena na […] RON/MWh, ter tri pogodbe podjetja Hidroelectrica imajo večje razliko v ceni, in sicer pogodbe s podjetji Luxten-Lighting, Electrocarbon in Elsid z razliko v opazovani ceni v višini približno […] RON/MWh za Luxten-Lighting ter […] RON/MWh za Electrobarbon in Elsid (glej tabelo 3).
including the supplier identity reflects the fact that some suppliers have characteristics which would allow them to establish prices differently from others, taking into account that contract supplies from virtually all electricity suppliers active in Romania are included in the dataset,
Tabela 3
including year dummies reflects the time dimension and the possible change in market conditions from one year to another.
Analiza pogodb iz leta 2008
As regards the first step of the empirical analysis, the results of the regression analysis of the dataset contracts are reported in Table 1 below.
Za leto 2009 je NNO razlika v ceni ocenjena na […] RON/MWh, in spet imajo tri pogodbe podjetja Hidroelectrica večje razlike v ceni, in sicer pogodbe s podjetji Luxten-Lighting, Electrocarbon in Elsid z razliko v opazovani ceni v višini približno […] RON/MWh za Luxten-Lighting ter […] RON/MWh za Electrobarbon in Elsid (glej tabelo 4).
As regards the second step of the empirical analysis, the Commission has identified a benchmark for every year and has then tested the position of the contracts relative to this benchmark in order to conclude whether the prices charged by Hidroelectrica were lower or higher than the modelled benchmark price.
Tabela 4
The following steps describe in detail the methodology used to determine the benchmark:
Analiza pogodb iz leta 2009
Firstly, for each contract of the dataset, it was calculated how far the actual price departed from its corresponding benchmark price, calculated on the basis of the regression and of the characteristics of the contract;
Za leto 2010 je razlika v ceni v povezavi z NNO-pogodbo ocenjena na […] RON/MWh, in dve pogodbi podjetja Hidroelectrica imata večjo razliko v ceni, in sicer pogodbi s podjetjema Electrocarbon in Elsid z opazovano razliko v ceni v višini približno […] RON/MWh (glej preglednico 5).