natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Given that such measures can be particularly damaging to the security of gas supply, it is appropriate that they enter into force only when they are approved by the Commission or have been amended in accordance with a Commission decision.
Treba je zagotoviti predvidljivost ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti v primeru izrednih razmer, s čimer bi vsi udeleženci na trgu imeli dovolj priložnosti, da se odzovejo in pripravijo na take okoliščine.
Demand-side measures, such as fuel switching or reducing the gas supply to large industrial customers in an economically efficient order, may have a valuable role to play in ensuring the security of gas supply, if they can be applied quickly and significantly reduce demand in response to a disruption of gas supply.
Praviloma bi morali pristojni organi delovati v skladu s svojim načrtom za izredne razmere.
More should be done to promote efficient energy use, particularly where demand-side measures are needed.
V ustrezno utemeljenih izjemnih okoliščinah pa bi jim bilo treba dovoliti, da sprejmejo ukrepe, ki odstopajo od teh načrtov.
The environmental impact of any demand and supply-side measures proposed should be taken into account, with preference being given, as far as possible, to measures that have least impact on the environment.
Prav tako je pomembno, da se izredne razmere razglasijo na čim bolj pregleden in predvidljiv način.
At the same time, aspects of the security of gas supply and competitiveness should be taken into account.
Informacije o stanju izravnave prenosnega sistema (splošno stanje prenosnega omrežja), okvir katerega je določen v Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 312/2014 [12], imajo lahko pri tem pomembno vlogo.
It is necessary to ensure the predictability of the action to take in the event of an emergency, allowing all market participants sufficient opportunity to react to and prepare for such circumstances.
Te informacije bi morale biti na voljo v realnem času pristojnim organom in nacionalnim regulativnim organom, kadar niso pristojni organi.
As a rule, the competent authorities should therefore act in accordance with their emergency plan.
Kot je razvidno iz rezultatov izvedbe stresnega testa iz oktobra 2014, je solidarnostna pomoč pogoj za zanesljivost oskrbe s plinom v Uniji.
In duly justified exceptional circumstances, they should be allowed to take action which deviates from those plans.
Učinke enakomerneje porazdeli in zmanjša skupne posledice resnih motenj.
It is also important to make the way in which emergencies are declared more transparent and predictable.
Solidarnostni mehanizem je zasnovan za obvladovanje skrajnih razmer, v katerih je oskrba solidarnostnozaščitenih odjemalcev kot temeljna potreba in nujna prednostna naloga v državi članici ogrožena.
Information on the system balancing position (the overall status of the transmission network), the framework for which is set out in Commission Regulation (EU) No 312/2014 [12], may play an important role in that regard.
Solidarnostna pomoč zagotavlja sodelovanje z bolj ranljivimi državami članicami.
That information should be available to the competent authorities and, where they are not the competent authorities, the national regulatory authorities, on a real time basis.
Hkrati pa je solidarnostna pomoč zadnje sredstvo, ki se uporabi le v izrednih razmerah in le pod strogimi pogoji.
As demonstrated in the context of the October 2014 stress test exercise, solidarity is needed to ensure the security of gas supply in the Union.
Če država članica razglasi izredne razmere, bi bilo zato treba vzpostavljanje zanesljivosti oskrbe s plinom izvajati postopno in sorazmerno.
It spreads effects out more evenly and reduces overall effects of a severe disruption.
Država članica, ki je razglasila izredne razmere, bi za zagotovitev oskrbe svojih solidarnostno zaščitenih odjemalcev s plinom kot prvo zlasti morala izvesti vse ukrepe v izrednih razmerah iz svojega načrta za izredne razmere.
The solidarity mechanism is designed to address extreme situations in which supply to solidarityprotected customers as an essential need and a necessary priority is at stake in a Member State.
Hkrati bi morale vse države članice, ki so uvedle višji standard oskrbe, tega spet začasno znižati na normalen standard oskrbe, da bi povečale likvidnost trga plina, če država članica, ki razglasi izredne razmere, sporoči, da je potrebno čezmejno ukrepanje.
Solidarity ensures cooperation with more vulnerable Member States.
Če s tema nizoma ukrepov ni mogoče zagotoviti potrebne oskrbe, bi morale neposredno povezane države članice na prošnjo države članice, ki je razglasila izredne razmere, sprejeti solidarnostne ukrepe za zagotovitev oskrbe solidarnostno zaščitenih odjemalcev s plinom v navedeni državi članici.
At the same time, solidarity is a measure of last resort that applies only in an emergency and only under restrictive conditions.
Takšni solidarnostni ukrepi bi morali zagotavljati, da se oskrba s plinom za odjemalce, ki niso solidarnostno zaščiteni odjemalci na ozemlju države članice, ki zagotavlja solidarnostno pomoč, zmanjša ali se ne nadaljuje, da bi tako sprostili količine plina v potrebnem obsegu in za toliko časa, da bi bila oskrba s plinom za solidarnostno zaščitene odjemalce v državi članici, ki je zaprosila za solidarnostno pomoč, zadostna.
If an emergency is declared in a Member State, a gradual and proportionate approach should therefore be applied to ensure the security of gas supply.
Nobena določba te uredbe se ne bi smela razumeti, kot da od države članice zahteva ali ji omogoča, da opravlja naloge javnega organa v drugi državi članici.
The Member State that declared the emergency should, in particular, first implement all emergency measures provided for in its emergency plan in order to ensure gas supply to its solidarity protected customers.
Solidarnostne ukrepe bi bilo treba kot zadnje sredstvo uporabiti tudi, kadar je država članica povezana z drugo državo članico prek tretje države, razen če so pretoki prek tretje države omejeni, in kadar obstaja dogovor zadevnih držav članic, ki bi morale po potrebi vključiti tretjo državo, prek katere sta povezani.
At the same time, all Member States which have introduced an increased supply standard should temporarily reduce it to the normal supply standard to make the gas market more liquid, in the event that the Member State declaring the emergency indicates that cross-border action is required.
Kadar se solidarnostni ukrepi uporabijo kot zadnje sredstvo, bi moralo – kadar mora država članica tako ravnati zaradi izpolnjevanja solidarnostnih obveznosti ter zato, da bi se izognili diskriminatorni obravnavi – zmanjšanje ali prekinitev oskrbe s plinom v državi članici, ki zagotavlja solidarnostno pomoč, veljati za vse odjemalce, ki niso solidarnostno zaščiteni odjemalci, ne glede na to, ali prejemajo plin neposredno ali prek solidarnostno zaščitenih sistemov za daljinsko ogrevanje v obliki toplote.
If those two sets of measures fail to provide the necessary supply, solidarity measures by directly connected Member States should be taken to ensure gas supply to solidarity protected customers in the Member State experiencing the emergency, at that Member State's request.
Enako bi bilo treba zagotoviti v obratno smer pri odjemalcih, ki niso solidarnostno zaščiteni odjemalci v državi članici, ki prejema plin iz solidarnostnega mehanizma.
Such solidarity measures should consist in ensuring that the gas supply to customers other than solidarity protected customers in the territory of the Member State providing solidarity is reduced or does not continue, in order to free up gas volumes, to the extent necessary and for as long as the gas supply to solidarity protected customers in the Member State requesting solidarity is not satisfied.
Kadar se solidarnostni ukrepi uporabijo kot zadnje sredstvo, je primerneje, da se poraba plina v državi članici, ki zagotavlja solidarnostno pomoč, najprej zmanjša prostovoljno s tržnimi ukrepi, kot so prostovoljni ukrepi na strani povpraševanja ali obratne dražbe, ko nekateri odjemalci, kot so industrijski odjemalci, operaterju prenosnega sistema ali drugemu pristojnemu organu sporočijo ceno, pri kateri bi zmanjšali ali ustavili svojo porabo plina.
Nothing in this Regulation should be understood as requiring or enabling a Member State to exercise public authority in another Member State.
Če se izkaže, da tržni ukrepi ne zadostujejo za odpravo primanjkljaja v potrebni oskrbi s plinom in ob upoštevanju pomembnosti solidarnostne pomoči kot zadnjega sredstva, bi morala država članica, ki zagotavlja solidarnostno pomoč, imeti možnost, da kot drugi korak uporabi netržne ukrepe, vključno z omejevanjem oskrbe nekaterih skupin odjemalcev, da bi izpolnila svoje obveznosti glede solidarnostne pomoči.
Solidarity measures should also be taken as a last resort where a Member State is connected to another Member State via a third country unless flows are restricted through the third country, and where there is agreement of the relevant Member States, who should involve, as appropriate, the third country through which they are connected.
Solidarnostne ukrepe kot zadnje sredstvo bi bilo treba izvajati na podlagi nadomestila.
Where solidarity measures are taken as a last resort, the reduction or discontinuation of gas supply in the Member State providing solidarity should, where necessary for the Member State to comply with its solidarity obligations, and in order to avoid discriminatory treatment, be applicable to all customers which are not solidarity protected customers, irrespective of whether they receive gas directly or through solidarity protected district heating installations in the form of heating.
Država članica, ki prejme solidarnostno pomoč, bi morala državi članici, ki zagotovi solidarnostno pomoč, takoj plačati pravično nadomestilo, med drugim tudi za plin, dobavljen na njeno ozemlje, ter vse druge ustrezne in razumne stroške, ki nastanejo pri zagotavljanju solidarnostne pomoči.
The same should be ensured vice versa as regards customers, which are not solidarity protected customers in the Member State receiving gas under the solidarity mechanism.
Solidarnostni ukrepi kot zadnje sredstvo bi zato morali biti vezani na pogoj, da se država članica, ki zaprosi za solidarnostno pomoč, zaveže, da bo plačala tako pravično in takojšnje nadomestilo.
Where solidarity measures are taken as a last resort, it is preferable that the gas consumption in the Member State providing solidarity is, as a first step, reduced on a voluntary basis, by means of market-based measures, such as voluntary demand-side measures or reversed auctions, in which certain customers such as industrial customers would indicate to the transmission system operator or another authority responsible the price at which they would reduce or stop their gas consumption.
Ta uredba ne harmonizira vseh vidikov pravičnega nadomestila.
If market-based measures are found to be insufficient to address the deficit in required gas supply, and given the importance of solidarity measures as a last resort, the Member State providing solidarity should as a second step, be able to make use of non-market-based measures, including curtailment of certain groups of customers, in order to comply with its solidarity obligations.
Zadevne države članice bi morale sprejeti potrebne ukrepe – zlasti tehnične, pravne in finančne dogovore –, ki med njimi urejajo izvajanje določb o takojšnjem in pravičnem nadomestilu.
Solidarity measures of a last resort should be provided on the basis of compensation.
Države članice pri uporabi solidarnostnih ukrepov v skladu z določbami te uredbe izvajajo pravo Unije, zato morajo spoštovati temeljne pravice, zagotovljene z njim.
The Member State providing solidarity should be paid fair compensation promptly by the Member State receiving solidarity, including for the gas delivered into its territory and all other relevant and reasonable costs incurred when providing solidarity.
Zaradi takšnih ukrepov se lahko zgodi, da mora država članica plačati nadomestilo tistim, ki so jih njeni ukrepi prizadeli.
Solidarity measures of a last resort should be subject to the condition that the Member State requesting solidarity undertakes to pay such fair and prompt compensation.
Države članice bi zato morale zagotoviti obstoj nacionalnih predpisov o nadomestilih, ki so skladni s pravom Unije, zlasti s temeljnimi pravicami.
This Regulation does not harmonise all aspects of fair compensation.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da država članica, ki prejme solidarnostno pomoč, v končni fazi prevzame vse razumne stroške, nastale zaradi navedene obveznosti, ki obvezuje državo članico, ki zagotavlja solidarnostno pomoč, da plača nadomestilo in nadaljnje razumne stroške, ki nastanejo zaradi plačila nadomestila v skladu z navedenimi nacionalnimi predpisi o nadomestilih.
Member States concerned should adopt the necessary measures, in particular technical, legal and financial arrangements, to implement the provisions on prompt and fair compensation between them.
Ker bi lahko več držav članic zagotovilo solidarnostno pomoč državi članici, ki zanjo zaprosi, bi bilo treba vzpostaviti mehanizem za delitev bremena.
When taking solidarity measures pursuant to the provisions of this Regulation, Member States are implementing Union law and are therefore bound to respect fundamental rights guaranteed by Union law.
V okviru tega mehanizma bi morala država članica, ki zaprosi za solidarnostno pomoč, po posvetovanju z vsemi zadevnimi državami članicami poiskati najugodnejšo ponudbo, in sicer na podlagi stroškov, hitrosti dobave, zanesljivosti in diverzifikacije oskrbe s plinom iz različnih držav članic.
Such measures may therefore give rise to an obligation for a Member State to pay compensation to those affected by its measures.
Države članice bi morale takšne ponudbe dati na podlagi prostovoljnih ukrepov na strani povpraševanja v čim večji meri in za čim več časa, preden uporabijo netržne ukrepe.
Member States should therefore ensure that national compensation rules are in place which are in conformity with Union law, in particular with fundamental rights.
Ta uredba prvič uvaja tak solidarnostni mehanizem med državami članicami kot instrument za ublažitev učinkov hudih izrednih razmer znotraj Unije in tudi kot mehanizem za delitev bremena.
Moreover, it should be ensured that the Member State receiving solidarity ultimately bears all reasonable costs incurred from the said obligation on the Member State providing solidarity to pay compensation and further reasonable costs incurred from the payment of compensation pursuant to the said national compensation rules.
Zato bi morala Komisija pregledati mehanizem za delitev bremena ter solidarnostni mehanizem na splošno, in sicer z vidika prihodnjih izkušenj z njunim delovanjem, in po potrebi predlagati spremembe.
Since there may be more than one Member State providing solidarity to a requesting Member State, there should be a burden-sharing mechanism.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za izvajanje določb v zvezi s solidarnostnim mehanizmom, pri čemer bi morale zadevne države članice skleniti tudi tehnične, pravne in finančne dogovore.
Under that mechanism, the Member State requesting solidarity should, after consulting all Member States concerned, seek the most advantageous offer on the basis of cost, speed of delivery, reliability and diversification of supplies of gas from different Member States.
Države članice bi morale v svojih načrtih za izredne razmere opisati podrobnosti teh dogovorov.
The Member States should provide such offers on the basis of voluntary demand-side measures as much as and for as long as possible, before resorting to non-market-based measures.
Komisija bi morala pripraviti pravno nezavezujoče smernice glede ključnih elementov, ki bi jih bilo treba vključiti v take dogovore.
This Regulation introduces, for the first time, such a solidarity mechanism between Member States as an instrument to mitigate the effects of a severe emergency within the Union including a burden-sharing mechanism.
Dokler lahko država članica svoje solidarnostno zaščitene odjemalce oskrbuje s plinom iz lastne proizvodnje in ji torej ni treba zaprositi za solidarnostno pomoč, bi morala biti izvzeta iz obveznosti za sklepanje tehničnih, pravnih in finančnih dogovorov z drugimi državami članicami za namene prejemanja solidarnostne pomoči.
The Commission should therefore review the burden-sharing mechanism and the solidarity mechanism in general in the light of future experience with their functioning, and propose, where appropriate, modifications thereto.
To ne bi smelo posegati v obveznost zadevne države članice glede zagotavljanja solidarnostne pomoči drugim državam članicam.
Member States should adopt the necessary measures for the implementation of the provisions concerning the solidarity mechanism, including by the Member States concerned agreeing on technical, legal and financial arrangements.
Uvesti bi bilo treba zaščitni ukrep za primer, da bi Unija imela stroške zaradi odgovornosti – razen za nezakonita dejanja ali nezakonito ravnanje v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 340 PDEU – v zvezi z ukrepi, ki jih morajo države članice sprejeti v skladu z določbami te uredbe glede solidarnostnega mehanizma.
Member States should describe the details of those arrangements in their emergency plans.
V takšnih primerih je ustrezno, da država članica, ki prejme solidarnostno pomoč, povrne stroške Unije.
The Commission should prepare legally non-binding guidance concerning the key elements that should be included in such arrangements.
Solidarnost bi morala biti po potrebi izražena tudi v obliki pomoči civilne zaščite, ki jo zagotavljajo Unija in njene države članice.
For as long as a Member State can cover the gas consumption of its solidarity protected customers from its own production and therefore does not need to request solidarity, it should be exempt from the obligation to conclude technical, legal and financial arrangements with other Member States for the purpose of it receiving solidarity.
Tako pomoč bi bilo treba olajšati in usklajevati z mehanizmom Unije na področju civilne zaščite, vzpostavljenim s Sklepom št. 1313/2013/EU, katerega cilj je okrepiti sodelovanje med Unijo in državami članicami ter olajšati usklajevanje na področju civilne zaščite, da bi se izboljšala učinkovitost sistemov za preprečevanje naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek, ter za pripravljenost in odziv nanje.
This should not affect the obligation of the relevant Member State to provide solidarity to other Member States.
Za oceno zanesljivosti oskrbe s plinom v državi članici, v delu Unije ali v celotni Uniji je nujno potreben dostop do relevantnih informacij.
There should be a safeguard for the event that the Union might incur costs by virtue of a liability, other than for unlawful acts or conduct pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU, in respect of measures that Member States are required to take pursuant to the provisions of this Regulation on the solidarity mechanism.
Zlasti države članice in Komisija potrebujejo reden dostop do informacij podjetij plinskega gospodarstva v zvezi z glavnimi parametri oskrbe s plinom, vključno z natančnimi meritvami razpoložljivih shranjenih rezerv, kot temeljnim prispevkom pri oblikovanju politik za zanesljivost oskrbe s plinom.
Regarding such instances, it is appropriate that the Member State receiving solidarity reimburse the costs of the Union.
Iz utemeljenih razlogov bi bilo treba ne glede na to, ali so bile razglašene izredne razmere ali ne, omogočiti tudi dostop do dodatnih informacij, potrebnih za oceno splošnega stanja oskrbe s plinom.
Solidarity should also, where needed, take the form of civil protection assistance provided by the Union and its Member States.
Te dodatne informacije so običajno informacije o prevzemu plina, ki niso povezane s ceno, kot so najmanjše in največje količine plina, prevzemna mesta ali pogoji za prekinitev oskrbe s plinom.
Such assistance should be facilitated and coordinated by the Union Civil Protection Mechanism established by Decision No 1313/2013/EU aiming to strengthen the cooperation between the Union and the Member States and to facilitate coordination in the field of civil protection in order to improve the effectiveness of systems for preventing, preparing for, and responding to natural and man-made disasters.
Učinkovit in ciljno usmerjen mehanizem za dostop držav članic in Komisije do ključnih pogodb o dobavi plina bi moral omogočiti celovito oceno relevantnih tveganj, ki lahko povzročijo motnje v oskrbi s plinom ali ovirajo potrebne blažilne ukrepe, če bi do krize vseeno prišlo.
To assess the security of gas supply of a Member State or in part or the whole of the Union, access to the relevant information is essential.
V okviru tega mehanizma bi bilo treba nekatere ključne pogodbe o dobavi plina samodejno priglasiti pristojnim organom najbolj prizadetih držav članic, in sicer ne glede na to, ali plin izvira iz Unije ali iz držav zunaj nje.
In particular, Member States and the Commission need regular access to information from natural gas undertakings regarding the main parameters of the gas supply, including accurate measurements of the available stored reserves, as a fundamental input in the design of security of gas supply policies.
Nove pogodbe ali spremembe bi bilo treba priglasiti takoj po njihovi sklenitvi.
On reasonable grounds, irrespective of a declaration of an emergency, access should also be possible to additional information needed to assess the overall gas supply situation.
Da bi zagotovili preglednost in zanesljivost, bi bilo treba priglasiti tudi obstoječe pogodbe.
That additional information would typically be non-price-related gas delivery information, such as minimum and maximum gas volumes, delivery points or conditions for the suspension of gas deliveries.
Obveznost priglasitve bi morala veljati tudi za vse trgovinske sporazume, ki so pomembni za izvajanje pogodbe o dobavi plina, vključno z ustreznimi sporazumi, ki se lahko nanašajo na infrastrukturo, skladiščenje in vse druge vidike, pomembne za zanesljivost oskrbe s plinom.
An efficient and targeted mechanism for access by Member States and the Commission to key gas supply contracts should ensure a comprehensive assessment of relevant risks that can lead to a disruption of gas supply or interfere with the necessary mitigating measures should a crisis nevertheless occur.
Vsaka obveznost samodejne priglasitve pogodbe pristojnemu organu mora biti sorazmerna.
Under that mechanism, certain key gas supply contracts should be automatically notified, irrespective of the origin of the gas, within or outside the Union, to the competent authority of the most affected Member States.
Uporaba te obveznosti za pogodbe med dobaviteljem in kupcem, ki zajemajo vsaj 28 % letne porabe plina na nacionalnem trgu, vzpostavlja pravo ravnotežje v smislu upravne učinkovitosti in preglednosti ter določa jasne obveznosti za udeležence na trgu.
New contracts or modifications should be notified immediately after their conclusion.
Za namene zanesljivosti oskrbe s plinom bi pristojni organ moral pogodbo oceniti, rezultate ocene pa predložiti Komisiji.
In order to ensure transparency and reliability, existing contracts should also be notified.
Če pristojni organ ni prepričan, ali pogodba ogroža zanesljivost oskrbe s plinomv državi članici ali regiji, bi moral to pogodbo priglasiti Komisiji.
The notification obligation should also cover all commercial agreements that are relevant for the execution of the gas supply contract, including relevant agreements that may be related to infrastructure, storage and any other aspect important for the security of gas supply.
To ne pomeni, da druge pogodbe o dobavi plina niso pomembne za zanesljivost oskrbe s plinom.