natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p.
Seznam računov na podlagi zaveze, ki jih je izdala družba Alternative Energy (AE) Solar Co.
1.
Ltd in ki se razglasijo za neveljavne:
ANNEX I
Seznam računov na podlagi zaveze, ki jih je izdala družba Wuxi Saijing Solar Co.
List of undertaking invoices issued by Alternative Energy (AE) Solar Co.
Ltd in ki se razglasijo za neveljavne:
Ltd, which are declared invalid:
PRILOGA II
List of companies:
WANXIANG IMPORT EXPORT CO LTD
In addition, the Commission notes that the invoices submitted by AE Solar do not prove that the MIP was respected for the above transactions as the resale invoices covered both solar panels and other products.
Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science Technology Co., Ltd
Ltd
Ningbo Ulica Solar Science Technology Co., Ltd
LTD
Shanghai Chaori Solar Energy Science Technology Co.
The Annex to this Decision lists the exporting producers for whom the undertaking was accepted, inter alia:
Wuxi Taichen Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd.
By Implementing Decision 2014/657/EU [11], the Commission accepted a proposal by the exporting producers together with the CCCME for clarifications concerning the implementation of the undertaking for the products concerned covered by the undertaking, that is modules and cells originating in or consigned from the PRC, currently falling within CN codes ex85414090 (TARIC codes 8541409021, 8541409029, 8541409031 and 8541409039) produced by the exporting producers (‘product covered’).
Xi'an Huanghe Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd
The anti-dumping and countervailing duties referred to in recital 4 above, together with the undertaking, are jointly referred to thereafter as ‘measures’.
Yuhuan Sinosola Science Technology Co., Ltd
Alternative Energy (AE) Solar Co.
Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science Technology Limited Liability Company
Ltd
Zhejiang Yauchong Light Energy Science Technology Co., Ltd
Wuxi Saijing Solar Co.
Jiangsu Shunfeng Photovoltic Technology Co., Ltd
Ltd
Anhui Chaoqun Power Co., Ltd
Lightway Green New Energy(Zhuozhou) Co.
Quanjiao Jingkun Trade Co., Ltd.
Ltd
Changzhou NESL Solartech Co., Ltd
Hanwha SolarOne (Qidong) Co.
Changzhou Shangyou Lianyi Electronic Co., Ltd
Ltd
CSG PVtech Co., Ltd
Xi'an SunOasis (Prime) Company Limited
Ltd.
LTD
EOPLLY New Energy Technology Co., Ltd
LTD
Guodian Jintech Solar Energy Co., Ltd
Ningbo Jinshi Solar Electrical Science & Technology Co.
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd
Ningbo Ulica Solar Science & Technology Co.
Jiangsu Green Power PV Co., Ltd
Ltd
Jiangsu Hosun Solar Power Co., Ltd
SHANGHAI ALEX SOLAR ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO.
Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd
LTD
Jiangsu Runda PV Co., Ltd
Shanghai Chaori Solar Energy Science & Technology Co.
Jiangsu Sainty Photovoltaic Systems Co., Ltd
Wuxi Taichen Machinery & Equipment Co.
Jiangsu Sunlink PV Technology Co., Ltd
Yuhuan Sinosola Science & Technology Co.
Juli New Energy Co., Ltd
Ltd
Jumao Photonic (Xiamen) Co., Ltd
Zhejiang Yauchong Light Energy Science & Technology Co.
Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd
Ltd
Ningbo Komaes Solar Technology Co., Ltd
PRAF02316001-1
Ningbo South New Energy Technology Co., Ltd
PRAF02316001-2
Ningbo Sunbe Electric Ind Co., Ltd
Greenway Solar-Tech (Huaian) Co.
Perfectenergy (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
Ltd
Perlight Solar Co., Ltd
HENGJI PV-TECH ENERGY CO.
Propsolar (Zhejiang) New Energy Technology Co., Ltd
Jiangsu Aide Solar Energy Technology Co.
Ningbo Sun Earth Solar Energy Co.
Anhui Chaoqun Power Co.
TDG Holding Co., Ltd
Ltd
Zhejiang Global Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd
ChangZhou EGing Photovoltaic Technology Co.
Zhejiang Heda Solar Technology Co., Ltd
Ltd
Zhejiang Jiutai New Energy Co., Ltd
CSG PVtech Co.
Zhejiang Kingdom Solar Energy Technic Co., Ltd
China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co.
Zhejiang Mega Solar Energy Co., Ltd
Ltd
Zhejiang Shuqimeng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd
CEEG Nanjing Renewable Energy Co.
Zhejiang Sunrupu New Energy Co., Ltd
Ltd
Zhejiang Tianming Solar Technology Co., Ltd
CEEG (Shanghai) Solar Science Technology Co.
Zhejiang Trunsun Solar Co., Ltd
Ltd
Zhejiang Wanxiang Solar Co., Ltd
China Sunergy (Yangzhou) Co.
Kinve Solar Power Co., Ltd (Maanshan)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1526
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1526
concerning the non-approval of the active substance beta-cypermethrin in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market
o neodobritvi aktivne snovi beta-cipermetrin v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC [1], and in particular Article 13(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in razveljavitvi direktiv Sveta 79/117/EGS in 91/414/EGS [1] ter zlasti člena 13(2) Uredbe, ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
For beta-cypermethrin the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Implementing Decision 2011/266/EU [3].
Za navedeno aktivno snov je bila v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) in (4) Direktive 91/414/EGS izvedena ocena vplivov na zdravje ljudi in živali ter na okolje pri vrstah uporabe, ki jih je predlagal vlagatelj.
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the United Kingdom received an application from Cerexagri SAS on 13 November 2009 for the inclusion of the active substance beta-cypermethrin in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Imenovana država članica poročevalka je 4. aprila 2013 predložila osnutek poročila o oceni.
Implementing Decision 2011/266/EU confirmed that the dossier was ‘complete’ in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Osnutek poročila o oceni so pregledale države članice in Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija).
For that active substance, the assessment of the effects on human and animal health and the environment for the uses proposed by the applicant has been carried out in accordance with the procedure provided in Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Agencija je 27. maja 2014 Komisiji predložila sklep o oceni tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo beta-cipermetrin [4].
The designated rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report on 4 April 2013.
Agencija je ugotovila, da za ocenjene uporabe beta-cipermetrina obstaja visoko tveganje za vodne organizme, čebele in neciljne členonožce.
The draft assessment report was reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’).
Poleg tega ocena tveganja za talne in vodne organizme ter ocena izpostavljenosti za podzemno vodo nista mogli biti končani, ker niso bile zagotovljene zadostne informacije v zvezi s končnim stanjem in obnašanjem ciklopropilne skupine obroča beta-cipermetrina.
The Authority presented to the Commission its conclusion on the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta-cypermethrin [4] on 27 May 2014.
Poleg tega niso bile zagotovljene informacije o metabolizmu pri živini, ki so potrebne za potrditev opredelitve ostankov za živalske proizvode, ter informacije o toksičnem profilu metabolita PBA in njegovi relevantnosti za oceno tveganja za potrošnike.
The Authority concluded that for the uses of beta-cypermethrin assessed there is a high risk to aquatic organisms, bees and non-target arthropods.
Zato na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij ni bilo mogoče zaključiti, da beta-cipermetrin izpolnjuje pogoje za vključitev v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
In addition, the risk assessment for soil and aquatic organisms and the exposure assessment for groundwater could not be finalised as insufficient information was provided in relation to the fate and behaviour of the cyclopropyl ring moiety of beta-cypermethrin.
Komisija je vlagatelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k sklepu Agencije.
Furthermore, information on metabolism in livestock, which is necessary to confirm the residue definition for animal products, and information on the toxicity profile of metabolite PBA and its relevance for consumer risk assessment, were not provided.
Poleg tega je Komisija v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 188/2011 [5] vlagatelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k osnutku poročila o pregledu.
Consequently, it was not possible to conclude on the basis of the information available that beta-cypermethrin meets the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Vlagatelj je predložil pripombe, ki so bile natančno pregledane.
The Commission invited the applicant to submit its comments on the conclusion of the Authority.
Kljub argumentom, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, pomislekov iz uvodne izjave 4 ni bilo mogoče umakniti.
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 188/2011 [5], the Commission invited the applicant to submit comments on the draft review report.
Posledično ni bilo dokazano, da bi bilo pod predlaganimi pogoji uporabe pričakovati, da fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo beta-cipermetrin, na splošno izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
The applicant submitted its comments, which have been carefully examined.
Beta-cipermetrin se zato ne bi smel odobriti kot aktivna snov na podlagi člena 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
Despite the arguments put forward by the applicant, the concerns referred to in recital 4 could not be eliminated.
Ta uredba ne preprečuje vlagatelju, da predloži ponovni zahtevek za beta-cipermetrin v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
Consequently, it has not been demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing beta-cypermethrin satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
Beta-cypermethrin should therefore not be approved in accordance with Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
This Regulation does not prevent the applicant from submitting a further application for beta-cypermethrin in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Člen 1
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
Neodobritev aktivne snovi
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Aktivna snov beta-cipermetrin se ne odobri.
Non-approval of active substance
Začetek veljavnosti
The active substance beta-cypermethrin is not approved.
Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Entry into force
V Bruslju, 6. septembra 2017
Done at Brussels, 6 September 2017.
UL L 309, 24.11.2009, str. 1.
The President
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2011/266/EU z dne 2. maja 2011 o načelnem priznavanju popolnosti dokumentacije, predložene v podroben pregled zaradi možne vključitve beta-cipermetrina, evgenola, geraniola in timola v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS (UL L 114, 4.5.2011, str. 3).
OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta-cypermethrin (Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo beta-cipermetrin).
Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1).
EFSA Journal 2014;12(6):3717, 90 str. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3717.
Commission Implementing Decision 2011/266/EU of 2 May 2011 recognising in principle the completeness of the dossier submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of beta-cypermethrin, eugenol, geraniol and thymol in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ L 114, 4.5.2011, p. 3).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 188/2011 z dne 25. februarja 2011 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki niso bile v prometu dve leti po dnevu notifikacije navedene direktive (UL L 53, 26.2.2011, str. 51).
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2014, Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta-cypermethrin.
Z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2011/266/EU [3] je bilo potrjeno, da beta-cipermetrin izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 80(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
EFSA Journal 2014;12(6):3717, 90 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3717.
V skladu s členom 80(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 ter ob upoštevanju postopka in pogojev za odobritev je treba Direktivo Sveta 91/414/EGS [2] uporabljati za aktivne snovi, v zvezi s katerimi je bila pred 14. junijem 2011 sprejeta odločitev v skladu s členom 6(3) navedene direktive.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1527
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1527
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances cyflufenamid, fluopicolide, heptamaloxyloglucan and malathion
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 glede podaljšanja obdobij odobritve za aktivne snovi ciflufenamid, fluopikolid, heptamaloksiloglukan in malation
In view of the time and resources necessary for completing the assessment of applications for the renewal of approvals of the large number of active substances the approvals of which are expiring between 2019 and 2021, Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 6104 [4] established a work programme grouping together similar active substances and setting priorities on the basis of safety concerns for human and animal health or the environment as provided for in Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Ob upoštevanju časa in virov, ki so potrebni za dokončanje ocene vlog za obnovitev odobritev za tako veliko število aktivnih snovi, ki jim bo odobritev potekla med letoma 2019 in 2021, je bil z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije C(2016) 6104 [4] oblikovan delovni program, ki združuje podobne aktivne snovi in določa prednostne naloge na podlagi skrbi za varovanje zdravja ljudi in živali ali okolja, kot je določeno v členu 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
The presumed low risk substances should be prioritised in accordance with Implementing Decision C(2016) 6104.
Snovem, za katere se meni, da so snovi z majhnim tveganjem, bi bilo treba dati prednost v skladu z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije C(2016) 6104.
Taking into account the distribution of responsibilities and work among Member States acting as rapporteurs and co-rapporteurs and the available resources necessary for assessment and decision-making, that period should be of one year for the active substance heptamaloxyloglucan.
Ob upoštevanju razdelitve odgovornosti in nalog med državami članicami poročevalkami in soporočevalkami ter razpoložljivih virov, potrebnih za ocenjevanje in odločanje, bi moralo navedeno obdobje trajati eno leto za aktivno snov heptamaloksiloglukan.
For active substances which do not fall in the prioritised categories in Implementing Decision C(2016)6104, the approval period should be extended by either two or three years, taking into account the current date of expiry, the fact that in accordance with Article 6(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 the supplementary dossier for an active substance is to be submitted no later than 30 months before expiry of the approval, the need to ensure a balanced distribution of responsibilities and work among Member States acting as rapporteurs and co-rapporteurs and the available resources necessary for assessment and decision-making.
Za aktivne snovi, ki ne spadajo v prednostne kategorije v Izvedbenem sklepu C(2016) 6104, bi bilo treba obdobje odobritve podaljšati za dve ali tri leta, ob upoštevanju sedanjega datuma poteka veljavnosti, dejstva, da je treba v skladu s členom 6(3) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 844/2012 dopolnilno dokumentacijo za aktivno snov predložiti najpozneje 30 mesecev pred iztekom odobritve, nujnosti zagotovitve uravnotežene razdelitve odgovornosti in nalog med državami članicami poročevalkami in soporočevalkami ter razpoložljivih virov, potrebnih za ocenjevanje in odločanje.
It is therefore appropriate to extend the approval period for active substance malathion by two years, and to extend the approval periods of active substances cyflufenamid and fluopicolide by three years.
Zato je primerno podaljšati obdobje odobritve za aktivno snov malation za dve leti, za ciflufenamid in fluopikolid pa za tri leta.
In view of the aim of the first paragraph of Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, as regards cases where no supplementary dossier in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 is submitted no later than 30 months before the respective expiry date laid down in the Annex to this Regulation, the Commission will set the expiry date at the same date as before this Regulation or at the earliest date thereafter.
Glede na cilj prvega odstavka člena 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 za primere, ko dopolnilna dokumentacija v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 844/2012 ni bila predložena najpozneje 30 mesecev pred ustreznim datumom poteka veljavnosti iz Priloge k tej uredbi, bo Komisija določila isti datum veljavnosti kot pred to uredbo ali prvi možni datum po tem.
Done at Brussels, 6 September 2017.
V Bruslju, 6. septembra 2017
OJ L 153, 11.6.2011, p. 1.
UL L 153, 11.6.2011, str. 1.
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 296, Cyflufenamid, the date is replaced by ‘31 March 2023’;
v šestem stolpcu vrstice 296 se za ciflufenamid datum veljavnosti registracije nadomesti z „31. marec 2023“;
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 297, Fluopicolide, the date is replaced by ‘31 May 2023’;
v šestem stolpcu vrstice 297 se za fluopikolid datum veljavnosti registracije nadomesti z „31. maj 2023“;
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 298, Heptamaloxyloglucan, the date is replaced by ‘31 May 2021’;
v šestem stolpcu vrstice 298 se za heptamaloksiloglukan datum veljavnosti registracije nadomesti z „31. maj 2021“;
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 300, Malathion, the date is replaced by ‘30 April 2022’.
v šestem stolpcu vrstice 300 se za malation datum veljavnosti registracije nadomesti z „30. april 2022“.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1529
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1529
approving the basic substance sodium chloride in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
o odobritvi osnovne snovi natrijev klorid v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet ter o spremembi Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC [1], and in particular Article 23(5) in conjunction with Article 13(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in razveljavitvi direktiv Sveta 79/117/EGS in 91/414/EGS [1] ter zlasti člena 23(5) v povezavi s členom 13(2) Uredbe, ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
In addition, the Commission received on 21 July 2016 an application from ITAB for the approval of sea salt as basic substance for use as a fungicide and insecticide in grapes.
Navedenima zahtevkoma so bili priloženi podatki, ki se zahtevajo v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 23(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
Since both applications concern the substance sodium chloride of food-grade quality, the applications were merged.
Komisija je Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) zaprosila za znanstveno pomoč.
The applications were accompanied by the information required by the second subparagraph of Article 23(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Agencija je 20. januarja 2017 [2] Komisiji predložila tehnično poročilo o natrijevem kloridu.
The Commission asked the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) for scientific assistance.
Komisija je 23. marca 2017 Stalnemu odboru za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo predložila poročilo o pregledu [3] in osnutek te uredbe ter za sejo navedenega odbora 20. julija 2017 pripravila končni različici navedenih dokumentov.
The Authority presented to the Commission a Technical Report on sodium chloride on 20 January 2017 [2].
Iz dokumentacije, ki jo je predložil vlagatelj, je razvidno, da snov natrijev klorid izpolnjuje merila za živila, kot so opredeljena v členu 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
The Commission presented the review report [3] and a draft of this Regulation to the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed on 23 March 2017 and finalised them for the meeting of that Committee on 20 July 2017.
Čeprav se običajno ne uporablja za fitofarmacevtske namene, je lahko v sredstvu, ki vsebuje navedeno snov in vodo, koristna v fitofarmaciji.
The documentation provided by the applicant shows that sodium chloride fulfils the criteria of a foodstuff as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Zato jo je treba obravnavati kot osnovno snov.
Moreover, it is not predominantly used for plant protection purposes but nevertheless is useful in plant protection in a product consisting of the substance and water.
Opravljeni pregledi so pokazali, da se lahko od natrijevega klorida pričakuje, da na splošno izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 23 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, zlasti v zvezi z rabami, ki so bile proučene in podrobno navedene v poročilu Komisije o pregledu.
Consequently, it is to be considered as a basic substance.
Zato je primerno odobriti natrijev klorid kot osnovno snov.
It has appeared from the examinations made that sodium chloride may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report.
V skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 v povezavi s členom 6 Uredbe ter ob upoštevanju sedanjih znanstvenih in tehničnih dognanj pa je treba vključiti nekatere pogoje in omejitve.
It is therefore appropriate to approve sodium chloride as a basic substance.
V skladu s členom 13(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti Prilogo k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 [5].
In accordance with Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 in conjunction with Article 6 thereof and in the light of current scientific and technical knowledge, it is, however, necessary to include certain conditions and restrictions.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
Article 1
Snov natrijev klorid se odobri kot osnovna snov, kot je opredeljena v Prilogi I.
The substance sodium chloride is approved as a basic substance as laid down in Annex I.
Spremembe Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 540/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 7. septembra 2017
The President
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane, 2016; Outcome of the consultation with Member States and EFSA on the basic substance application for sodium chloride for use in plant protection as fungicide and bactericide in seed treatment and for disinfecting cutting tools (Izidi posvetovanja z državami članicami in agencijo EFSA o zahtevku za osnovno snov natrijev klorid za uporabo v fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih kot fungicid in baktericid za tretiranje semen in razkuževanje rezalnega orodja).
OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.
Povezane objave EFSA 2016:EN-1091, 39 str.