natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The rules of this Regulation on the protection of personal data should be interpreted and applied in accordance with the interpretation and application of Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10], which will apply to the processing of personal data by competent authorities of the Member States of the European Union for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties.
Interpol za izpolnjevanje svojih nalog prejema, shranjuje in razpošilja osebne podatke, s čimer pristojnim organom pomaga pri preprečevanju mednarodnega kriminala in boju proti njemu.
The data protection principle of fair processing is a distinct notion from the right to a fair trial as defined in Article 47 of the Charter and in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Zato je treba izboljšati sodelovanje med Unijo in Interpolom, in sicer s spodbujanjem učinkovite izmenjave operativnih osebnih podatkov, hkrati pa zagotavljati spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in svoboščin v zvezi z avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
The data protection provisions of this Regulation are without prejudice to the applicable rules on the admissibility of personal data as evidence in criminal court proceedings.
Pri prenosu osebnih podatkov od EJT na Interpol in v države, ki imajo svoje predstavnike v Interpolu, bi se morala uporabljati ta uredba, zlasti določbe o mednarodnih prenosih.
All Member States of the European Union are affiliated to the International Criminal Police Organisation (Interpol).
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v posebna pravila, določena v Skupnem stališču Sveta 2005/69/PNZ [11] in Sklepu Sveta 2007/533/PNZ [12].
To fulfil its mission, Interpol receives, stores and circulates personal data to assist competent authorities in preventing and combating international crime.
Kadar EJT posreduje operativne osebne podatke organu tretje države ali mednarodni organizaciji ali Interpolu na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, sklenjenega v skladu s členom 218 PDEU, bi bilo treba z ustreznimi zaščitnimi ukrepi za varstvo zasebnosti ter temeljnih pravic in svoboščin posameznikov zagotoviti, da se spoštujejo določbe o varstvu podatkov iz te uredbe.
It is therefore appropriate to strengthen cooperation between the Union and Interpol by promoting an efficient exchange of personal data whilst ensuring respect for fundamental rights and freedoms regarding the automatic processing of personal data.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito, zanesljivo in dosledno spremljanje skladnosti s to uredbo in njeno uveljavljanje, kar zadeva operativne osebne podatke, kakor zahteva člen 8 Listine, bi moral imeti Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov naloge iz te uredbe in učinkovita pooblastila, vključno s pooblastili za preiskovanje, sprejemanje popravljalnih ukrepov in svetovanje, ki so potrebna sredstva za opravljanje zadevnih nalog.
Where operational personal data are transferred from the EPPO to Interpol, and to countries which have delegated members to Interpol, this Regulation, in particular the provisions on international transfers, should apply.
Vendar pa pooblastila Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov ne bi smela neupravičeno posegati v posebna pravila za kazenske postopke, vključno s preiskovanjem in pregonom kaznivih dejanj, ali v neodvisnost sodstva.
This Regulation should be without prejudice to the specific rules laid down in Council Common Position 2005/69/JHA [11] and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA [12].
Da bi lahko EJT opravljalo svoje naloge in zaradi upoštevanja razvoja informacijske tehnologije ter napredka informacijske družbe, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje aktov v skladu s členom 290 DEU v zvezi s pripravo in posodabljanjem seznamov kategorij operativnih osebnih podatkov in kategorij posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo podatki, naštetih v Prilogi.
When the EPPO transfers operational personal data to an authority of a third country or to an international organisation or Interpol by virtue of an international agreement concluded pursuant to Article 218 TFEU, appropriate safeguards for the protection of privacy and the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals should ensure that the data protection provisions of this Regulation are complied with.
Zlasti je pomembno, da se Komisija pri svojem pripravljalnem delu ustrezno posvetuje, vključno s strokovnjaki, in da se ta posvetovanja opravijo v skladu z načeli, določenimi v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o boljši pripravi zakonodaje z dne 13. aprila 2016 [13].
In order to ensure effective, reliable and consistent monitoring of compliance with and enforcement of this Regulation as regards operational personal data, as required by Article 8 of the Charter, the European Data Protection Supervisor should have the tasks laid down in this Regulation and should have effective powers, including investigative, corrective, and advisory powers which constitute the necessary means to perform those tasks.
Za zagotovitev enakopravnega sodelovanja pri pripravi delegiranih aktov bi morala Evropski parlament in Svet zlasti prejeti vse dokumente sočasno s strokovnjaki iz držav članic, njuni strokovnjaki pa bi morali imeti možnost, da se sistematično udeležujejo sestankov strokovne skupine Komisije, ki zadevajo pripravo delegiranih aktov.
However, the powers of the European Data Protection Supervisor should not unduly interfere with specific rules for criminal proceedings, including investigation and prosecution of criminal offences, or the independence of the judiciary.
EJT bi moralo tesno sodelovati z drugimi institucijami, organi, uradi in agencijami Unije, da bi lažje opravljalo naloge v skladu s to uredbo, in po potrebi vzpostaviti formalne ureditve glede podrobnih pravil o izmenjavi informacij in sodelovanju.
In order to enable the EPPO to fulfil its tasks and to take account of developments in information technology, and in light of the state of progress in the information society, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of listing and updating the list of the categories of operational personal data and the categories of data subjects listed in an Annex.
Zlasti pomembno bi moralo biti sodelovanje z Europolom in z OLAF, da se prepreči podvajanje in se EJT omogoči pridobivanje ustreznih informacij, s katerimi razpolagata, in uporaba njunih analiz v posebnih preiskavah.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 [13].
EJT bi moralo imeti možnost pridobiti vse ustrezne informacije, ki sodijo v njegovo pristojnost ter so shranjene v podatkovnih zbirkah in registrih institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije.
In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council should receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts should systematically have access to meetings of the Commission expert group dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
EJT in Eurojust bi morala postati partnerja in sodelovati pri operativnih zadevah v skladu s svojima mandatoma.
The EPPO should work closely with other institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union in order to facilitate the exercise of its functions under this Regulation and establish, where necessary, formal arrangements on detailed rules relating to exchange of information and cooperation.
Takšno sodelovanje lahko vključuje kakršne koli preiskave, ki jih izvaja EJT in pri katerih se šteje, da je potrebno ali primerno izmenjati informacije ali usklajevati preiskovalne ukrepe glede zadev, ki so v pristojnosti Eurojusta.
Cooperation with Europol and OLAF should be of particular importance to avoid duplication and enable the EPPO to obtain the relevant information in their possession, as well as to draw on their analysis in specific investigations.
Kadar EJT zahteva takšno sodelovanje od Eurojusta, bi se moralo povezati z nacionalnim članom Eurojusta iz države članice evropskega delegiranega tožilca, ki obravnava zadevo.
The EPPO should be able to obtain any relevant information that falls within its competence stored in databases and registers of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union.
Pri operativnem sodelovanju lahko sodelujejo tudi tretje države, ki so sklenile sporazum o sodelovanju z Eurojustom.
The EPPO and Eurojust should become partners and should cooperate in operational matters in accordance with their respective mandates.
EJT in OLAF bi morala vzpostaviti in vzdrževati tesno sodelovanje ter tako zagotavljati dopolnjevanje njunih mandatov in preprečevati podvajanje.
Such cooperation may involve any investigations conducted by the EPPO where an exchange of information or coordination of investigative measures in respect of cases within the competence of Eurojust is considered to be necessary or appropriate.
V zvezi s tem OLAF načeloma ne bi smel začeti nobene upravne preiskave, ki je vzporedna preiskavi, ki jo izvaja EJT na podlagi istih dejstev.
Whenever the EPPO is requesting such cooperation of Eurojust, the EPPO should liaise with the Eurojust national member of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor’s Member State.
Vendar pa to ne bi smelo posegati v pristojnost OLAF, da začne upravno preiskavo na lastno pobudo in ob tesnem posvetovanju z EJT.
The operational cooperation may also involve third countries that have a cooperation agreement with Eurojust.
OLAF pri vseh ukrepih v podporo EJT deluje neodvisno od Komisije v skladu z Uredbo (EU, Euratom) št. 883/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [14].
The EPPO and OLAF should establish and maintain a close cooperation aimed at ensuring the complementarity of their respective mandates, and avoiding duplication.
V primerih, ko EJT ne izvaja preiskave, bi moralo imeti možnost zagotoviti zadevne informacije, da bi OLAF lahko razmislil o ustreznem ukrepanju v skladu s svojim mandatom.
In that regard, OLAF should in principle not open any administrative investigations parallel to an investigation conducted by the EPPO into the same facts.
Zlasti bi EJT lahko preučilo možnost, da OLAF obvesti o primerih, ko ni utemeljenih razlogov za domnevo, da se kaznivo dejanje, za katero je pristojno EJT, izvaja ali je bilo storjeno, bi pa bila v zvezi s tem ustrezna upravna preiskava s strani OLAF, oziroma ko EJT opusti zadevo in je odstop zadeve uradu OLAF zaželen zaradi upravnih ukrepov ali izterjave.
This should, however, be without prejudice to the power of OLAF to start an administrative investigation on its own initiative, in close consultation with the EPPO.
Če EJT zagotovi informacije, lahko zahteva, da se OLAF odloči bodisi za začetek upravne preiskave ali za druge upravne ukrepe ali spremljanje ukrepov, zlasti za namene previdnostnih ukrepov, izterjave ali disciplinskih ukrepov, v skladu z Uredbo (EU, Euratom) št. 883/2013.
In all actions in support of the EPPO, OLAF will act independently of the Commission, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [14].
Kolikor se postopki izterjave odložijo zaradi odločitev EJT v zvezi s preiskavami ali pregonom na podlagi te uredbe, se države članice ne bi smele šteti za krive ali malomarne za namene postopkov izterjave v smislu člena 122 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [15].
In cases where the EPPO is not conducting an investigation, it should be able to provide relevant information to allow OLAF to consider appropriate action in accordance with its mandate.
(107) EJT bi moralo institucijam, organom, uradom ali agencijam Unije ter drugim žrtvam omogočiti, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe.
In particular, the EPPO could consider informing OLAF of cases where there are no reasonable grounds to believe that an offence within the competence of the EPPO is being or has been committed, but an administrative investigation by OLAF may be appropriate, or where the EPPO dismisses a case and a referral to OLAF is desirable for administrative follow-up or recovery.
Pri načinu izmenjave informacij bi bilo treba dosledno spoštovati neodvisnost EJT, izvedena pa bi morala biti le v možnem obsegu, brez kakršnega koli poseganja v pravilno izvedbo in zaupnost preiskave.
The EPPO should enable the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union and other victims to take appropriate measures.
Če kolegij ugotovi operativno potrebo po sodelovanju s tretjo državo ali mednarodno organizacijo, bi moral imeti možnost predlagati, naj Svet opozori Komisijo, da je potreben sklep o ustreznosti ali priporočilo o začetku pogajanj glede mednarodnega sporazuma.
This may include taking precautionary measures, in particular to prevent any continuous wrongdoing or to protect the Union from reputational damage, or to allow them to intervene as a civil party in the proceedings in accordance with national law.
Preden Unija sklene nov mednarodni sporazum ali pristopi k večstranskim sporazumom, ki so jih že sklenile države članice o pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah, bi države članice morale EJT olajšati opravljanje njegovih nalog na podlagi načela lojalnega sodelovanja, vsebovanega v členu 4(3) PEU.
The exchange of information should take place in a manner that fully respects the independence of the EPPO, and only to the extent possible, without any prejudice to the proper conduct and confidentiality of investigations.
Če je dovoljeno v skladu z ustreznim večstranskim sporazumom ter če tretja država to sprejema, bi morale države članice priznati in po potrebi uradno obveščati EJT kot pristojni organ za namene izvajanja navedenih večstranskih sporazumov.
In so far as necessary for the performance of its tasks, the EPPO should also be able to establish and maintain cooperative relations with the authorities of third countries and international organisations.
To lahko v nekaterih primerih pomeni spremembo navedenih sporazumov, vendar ponovna pogajanja o takšnih sporazumih ne bi smela veljati za obvezen korak, saj morebiti niso vedno mogoča.
For the purpose of this Regulation, ‘international organisations’ means international organisations and their subordinate bodies governed by public international law or other bodies which are set up by, or on the basis of, an agreement between two or more countries as well as Interpol.
Države članice lahko tudi uradno obvestijo EJT kot pristojni organ za namene izvajanja drugih mednarodnih sporazumov o pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah, ki so jih sklenile, vključno s spremembo teh sporazumov.
Where the College identifies an operational need for cooperation with a third country or an international organisation, it should be able to suggest that the Council draw the attention of the Commission to the need for an adequacy decision or for a recommendation on the opening of negotiations on an international agreement.
Če uradno obveščanje EJT kot pristojnega organa za namene večstranskih sporazumov, ki so jih države članice že sklenile s tretjimi državami, ni mogoče ali če ga zadevne tretje države ne sprejemajo, in dokler Unija ne pristopi k takim mednarodnim sporazumom, lahko evropski delegirani tožilci za takšne tretje države uporabljajo svoj status nacionalnih tožilcev, če organe tretjih držav obvestijo in si, kjer je ustrezno, prizadevajo pridobiti njihovo soglasje za to, da bodo dokazi iz teh tretjih držav, zbrani na podlagi navedenih mednarodnih sporazumov, uporabljeni v preiskavah in pregonu, ki jih izvaja EJT.
Pending the conclusion of new international agreements by the Union or the accession by the Union to multilateral agreements already concluded by the Member States, on legal assistance in criminal matters, the Member States should facilitate the exercise by the EPPO of its functions pursuant to the principle of sincere cooperation enshrined in Article 4(3) TEU.
EJT bi moralo imeti možnost tudi, da se v odnosu do organov tretje države zanese na recipročnost ali meddržavno sodelovanje.
If permitted under a relevant multilateral agreement and subject to the third country’s acceptance, the Member States should recognise and, where applicable, notify the EPPO as a competent authority for the purpose of the implementation of those multilateral agreements.
To pa bi se moralo izvajati za vsak primer posebej v okviru omejitev stvarne pristojnosti EJT ter ob upoštevanju morebitnih pogojev, ki jih določijo organi tretje države.
This may entail, in certain cases, an amendment to those agreements but the renegotiation of such agreements should not be regarded as a mandatory step, since it may not always be possible.
Držav članic Evropske unije, ki niso vključene v okrepljeno sodelovanje v zvezi z ustanovitvijo EJT, ta uredba ne zavezuje.
The Member States may also notify the EPPO as a competent authority for the purpose of the implementation of other international agreements on legal assistance in criminal matters concluded by them, including by way of an amendment to those agreements.
Če je ustrezno, bi morala Komisija podati predloge za zagotavljanje učinkovitega pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah med EJT in državami članicami Evropske unije, ki niso vključene v okrepljeno sodelovanje v zvezi z ustanovitvijo EJT.
Where the notification of the EPPO as a competent authority for the purposes of multilateral agreements already concluded by the Member States with third countries is not possible or is not accepted by the third countries and pending the Union accession to such international agreements, European Delegated Prosecutors may use their status as national prosecutor toward such third countries, provided that they inform and where appropriate endeavour to obtain consent from the authorities of third countries that the evidence collected from these third countries on the basis of those international agreements, will be used in investigations and prosecutions carried out by the EPPO.
To bi moralo zlasti zadevati pravila o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah in na področju izročitev ob polnem spoštovanju pravnega reda Unije na tem področju ter dolžnost lojalnega sodelovanja v skladu s členom 4(3) PEU.
The EPPO should also be able to rely on reciprocity or international comity vis à-vis the authorities of third countries.
Da se zagotovi popolna avtonomija in neodvisnost EJT, bi mu bilo treba zagotoviti avtonomen proračun, katerega prihodki so v prvi vrsti prispevki iz proračuna Unije.
This should however be carried out on a case-by-case basis, within the limits of the material competence of the EPPO and subject to possible conditions set by the authorities of the third countries.
Finančna, proračunska in kadrovska ureditev EJT bi morala biti skladna z ustreznimi standardi Unije, ki veljajo za organe iz člena 208 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [16], pri čemer pa je treba ustrezno upoštevati edinstveno pristojnost EJT za izvajanje preiskav in pregona na ravni Unije.
Member States of the European Union which do not participate in enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO are not bound by this Regulation.
Stroške preiskovalnih ukrepov, ki jih sprejme EJT, bi načeloma morali kriti nacionalni organi, ki jih izvajajo.
The Commission should, if appropriate, submit proposals in order to ensure effective judicial cooperation in criminal matters between the EPPO and Member States of the European Union which do not participate in enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO.
Izjemno visoki stroški za preiskovalne ukrepe, kot so kompleksna mnenja izvedencev, obsežne policijske akcije ali dejavnosti opazovanja v daljšem časovnem obdobju, bi bili lahko delno povrnjeni s strani EJT, če je mogoče med drugim tudi s prerazporeditvijo sredstev iz drugih proračunskih vrstic EJT, ali s spremembo proračuna v skladu s to uredbo in veljavnimi finančnimi pravili.
This should in particular concern the rules relating to judicial cooperation in criminal matters and surrender, fully respecting the Union acquis in this field as well as the duty of sincere cooperation in accordance with Article 4(3) TEU.
Pri pripravi predloga za začasni osnutek ocene prihodkov in odhodkov bi moral upravni direktor upoštevati obveznost, da EJT delno povrne izjemno drage preiskovalne ukrepe, ki jih sprejme stalni senat.
To guarantee the full autonomy and independence of the EPPO, it should be granted an autonomous budget, with revenue coming essentially from a contribution from the budget of the Union.
Operativni odhodki EJT se krijejo iz proračuna EJT.
The financial, budgetary and staff regime of the EPPO should follow the relevant Union standards applicable to bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [16], with due regard, however, to the fact that the competence of the EPPO to carry out criminal investigations and prosecutions at Union level is unique.
Ti bi morali vključevati stroške operativne komunikacije med evropskim delegiranim tožilcem in centralno ravnijo EJT, kot so poštni stroški, potni stroški, prevodi, potrebni za notranje delovanje EJT, ter drugi stroški, ki jih države članice pri preiskavi prej niso imele in so nastali zgolj zato, ker je EJT prevzelo odgovornost za preiskavo in pregon.
The costs of investigation measures undertaken by the EPPO should in principle be covered by the national authorities carrying them out.
Vendar bi morale stroške urada evropskih delegiranih tožilcev in tajniške podpore kriti države članice.
Exceptionally high costs for investigation measures such as complex experts’ opinions, extensive police operations or surveillance activities over a long period of time could partly be reimbursed by the EPPO, including, where possible, by reallocating resources from other budget lines of the EPPO, or by amending the budget in accordance with this Regulation and the applicable financial rules.
V skladu s členom 332 PDEU bodo izdatke, ki izhajajo iz ustanovitve EJT, krile države članice.
When preparing the proposal for the provisional draft estimate of the revenue and expenditure the Administrative Director should take into account the need of the EPPO to partly reimburse exceptionally costly investigation measures accepted by the Permanent Chamber.
Ti izdatki ne vključujejo stroškov poslovanja institucij v smislu člena 13(1) PEU.
Operational expenditures of the EPPO should be covered from the budget of the EPPO.
Kolegij bi načeloma vedno moral prenesti svoja pooblastila, dodeljena organu za imenovanje v skladu s Kadrovskimi predpisi za uradnike in pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti [17] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Kadrovski predpisi in Pogoji za zaposlitev), za sklepanje pogodb o zaposlitvi, upravnemu direktorju, razen če posebne okoliščine ne zahtevajo, da ta pooblastila izvaja kolegij.
These should include the cost of operational communication between the European Delegated Prosecutor and the central level of the EPPO, such as mail delivery costs, travel expenses, translations necessary for the internal functioning of the EPPO, and other costs not previously incurred by Member States during an investigation which are caused only due to the EPPO having assumed responsibilities for investigation and prosecution.
Upravni direktor je kot odredbodajalec odgovoren za izvrševanje proračuna EJT.
However, the costs of the European Delegated Prosecutors’ office and secretarial support should be covered by the Member States.
Upravni direktor je ob posvetovanju s stalnim senatom v zvezi z izjemno dragimi preiskovalnimi ukrepi pristojen za odločanje o znesku nepovratnih sredstev, ki se dodelijo, pri čemer upošteva razpoložljiva finančna sredstva in merila iz poslovnika EJT.
In accordance with Article 332 TFEU, expenditure resulting from the implementation of the EPPO will be borne by the Member States.
Prejemki evropskih delegiranih tožilcev kot posebnih svetovalcev, ki bodo določeni v neposrednem dogovoru, bi morali temeljiti na posebnem sklepu kolegija.