natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Any other person, including a stateless person [7], is to be considered ‘third-country national’.
vzdrževani predniki v ravni črti, vključno s predniki zakonca ali registriranega partnerja.
Further clarification:
Poleg kategorij iz točk (a) do (c) lahko v določenih okoliščinah tudi drugi družinski člani uživajo pravico do prostega gibanja v skladu s pravom Unije, zlasti kadar jim je bila podeljena pravica do vstopa in prebivanja v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, s katero se izvaja člen 3(2) Direktive 2004/38/ES.
Members of the family of EU/EEA/CH nationals, who therefore have a right of entry and residence with the Union citizen in the host Member State irrespective of their nationality, are:
Državljani tretjih držav, katerih zahtevek za ugotovitev, da so družinski člani državljana Unije, ki ima pravico Unije do prostega gibanja v skladu s členom 21 PDEU ali Direktivo 2004/38/ES, je država članica zavrnila, se lahko štejejo za državljane tretjih držav.
the spouse and, if contracted on the basis of the legislation of a Member State and recognised by the legislation of the host Member State as equivalent to marriage, the partner with whom the EU/EEA/CH citizen has contracted a registered partnership;
Take osebe torej lahko spadajo na področje uporabe direktive o vračanju in morali se bodo uporabiti minimalni standardi, postopki in pravice, predvideni v tej direktivi.
the direct descendants under the age of 21 or dependants, including those of the spouse or registered partner;
Kar pa zadeva morebitno pritožbo zoper odločbo, s katero je bilo zavrnjeno, da se za to osebo uporablja Direktiva 2004/38/ES, Komisija meni, da se bo oseba lahko še naprej – v skladu z ugodnejšimi določbami iz člena 4 direktive o vračanju – zanašala na postopkovne varovalne ukrepe iz poglavja VI Direktive 2004/38/ES (na primer kar zadeva obveščanje o odločbi in njeno utemeljevanje, obdobje za prostovoljno zapustitev ozemlja, postopke sodnega varstva).
the dependent direct relatives in the ascending line, including those of the spouse or registered partner.
Pravna podlaga: direktiva o vračanju – člen 3(2); Zakonik o schengenskih mejah – člen 6
In addition to the categories referred to in points (a) to (c), other members of the family can, under certain circumstances, also enjoy the right of free movement under Union law — notably when they have been granted the right of entry and residence under national law enacting Article 3(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC.
Prisotnost državljana tretje države na ozemlju države članice, ki ne izpolnjuje ali ne izpolnjuje več pogojev za vstop iz člena 5 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah ali drugih pogojev za vstop, bivanje ali stalno prebivališče v tej državi članici.
Third-country nationals whose claim to be a family member of a Union citizen enjoying a Union right to free movement under Article 21 TFEU or Directive 2004/38/EC was rejected by a Member State may be considered as third-country national.
Ta zelo široka opredelitev zajema vse državljane tretjih držav, ki nimajo zakonite pravice do prebivanja v državi članici.
Such persons may therefore fall in the scope of application of the Return Directive and the minimum standards, procedures and rights foreseen therein will have to be applied.
Vsak državljan tretje države, ki je fizično prisoten na ozemlju države članice EU, tam prebiva zakonito ali nezakonito.
However, as regards a possible appeal against the decision rejecting being a beneficiary of Directive 2004/38/EC, the Commission considers that the person will continue — as a more favourable provision under Article 4 of the Return Directive — to be able to rely on the procedural safeguards provided for in Chapter VI of Directive 2004/38/EC (for example, as regards notification and justification of decision, the time allowed to voluntarily leave the territory, redress procedures).
Tretje možnosti ni.
Legal basis: Return Directive — Article 3(2); Schengen Borders Code — Article 6
Pravne domneve v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki obravnavajo osebe, ki fizično prebivajo v posebej določenih delih ozemlja države članice (na primer tranzitna območja ali določena obmejna območja), kot da ne „prebivajo na ozemlju“, se v tem smislu ne upoštevajo, saj bi to onemogočalo usklajeno uporabo pravnega reda EU na področju vračanja.
The presence on the territory of a Member State, of a third-country national who does not fulfil, or no longer fulfils the conditions of entry as set out in Article 5 of the Schengen Borders Code or other conditions for entry, stay or residence in that Member State.
Države članice pa se lahko odločijo, da za to kategorijo oseb ne bodo uporabile določenih določb pravnega reda na področju vračanja (glej oddelek 2 v nadaljevanju).
This very broad definition covers any third-country national who does not enjoy a legal right to stay in a Member State.
Po kodifikaciji Zakonika o schengenskih mejah iz leta 2016 se sklicevanje na člen 5 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah v členu 3(2) direktive o vračanju šteje kot sklicevanje na sedanji člen 6 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah.
Any third-country national physically present on the territory of an EU Member State is either staying legally or illegally.
Naslednje kategorije državljanov tretjih držav se na primer štejejo za osebe, ki nezakonito prebivajo v zadevni državi članici:
There is no third option.
imetniki dovoljenja za prebivanje ali vizuma, ki mu je potekla veljavnost;
Legal fictions under national law which consider persons physically staying in specially designated parts of Member State territory (for example transit areas or certain border areas) as not ‘staying in the territory’ are irrelevant in this context, since this would undermine the harmonious application of the EU return acquis.
imetniki odvzetega dovoljenja ali vizuma;
Member States may, however, decide not to apply certain provisions of the return acquis to this category of persons (see section 2 below).
zavrnjeni prosilci za azil;
Following the 2016 codification of the Schengen Borders Code (SBC), reference to Article 5 SBC in Article 3(2) of the Return Directive shall be read as reference to current Article 6 SBC.
prosilci za azil, ki so prejeli odločbo o prenehanju njihove pravice do bivanja kot prosilci za azil;
The following categories of third-country nationals are, for instance, considered as illegally staying in the Member State concerned:
osebe, ki jim je bil zavrnjen vstop na meji;
Holders of an expired residence permit or visa;
osebe, ki so bile prestrežene pri nezakonitem prestopu meje;
Holders of a withdrawn permit or visa;
migranti brez urejenega statusa, prijeti na ozemlju države članice;
Rejected asylum seekers;
osebe, ki so bile prestrežene pri tranzitu čez ozemlje države članice, da bi prišle v drugo državo članico brez zakonite pravice;
Asylum applicants who have received a decision ending their right of stay as asylum seeker;
osebe, ki nimajo pravice do prebivanja v državi članici prijetja (čeprav imajo pravico do prebivanja v drugi državi članici);
Persons subject to a refusal of entry at the border;
osebe, prisotne na ozemlju države članice med obdobjem za prostovoljni odhod;
Persons intercepted in connection with irregular border crossing;
osebe, za katere se je vrnitev odložila.
Irregular migrants apprehended in Member States' territory;
Naslednje kategorije oseb se ne štejejo za osebe, ki nezakonito prebivajo, saj uživajo zakonito pravico do prebivanja (ki je lahko samo začasna) v zadevni državi članici:
Persons intercepted while transiting through a Member State's territory to reach another Member State without legal entitlement;
prosilci za azil, ki prebivajo v državi članici, v kateri uživajo pravico do prebivanja med nedokončanim azilnim postopkom;
Persons enjoying no right to stay in the Member State of apprehension (even though they are holding a right to stay in another Member State);
osebe brez državljanstva, ki prebivajo v državi članici, v kateri v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo uživajo pravico do prebivanja med postopkom za ugotavljanje apatridnosti;
Persons present on Member State territory during a period for voluntary departure;
osebe, ki prebivajo v državi članici, v kateri jim je uradno dovoljeno zadrževanje (če nacionalna zakonodaja obravnava tak status kot „zakonito prebivanje“);
Persons subject to postponed removal.
imetniki dovoljenja, ki je bilo pridobljeno na nepošten način, dokler to ni preklicano ali odvzeto in se še naprej šteje za veljavno dovoljenje.
The following categories of persons are not considered as illegally staying since they enjoy a legal right to stay (which may only be of temporary nature) in the Member State concerned:
Osebe, ki čakajo na rešitev prošnje za dovoljenje za prebivanje, lahko prebivajo zakonito ali nezakonito glede na to, ali imajo veljaven vizum ali uživajo drugo pravico do prebivanja ali ne.
asylum applicants staying in the Member State in which they enjoy a right to stay pending their asylum procedure,
Položaj nezakonitega prebivanja ne zahteva minimalnega trajanja prebivanja ali namena državljana tretje države nezakonito prebivati na ozemlju države članice – glej sodbo Sodišča v zadevi Affum, C-47/15 [8], točka 48.Prosilci za podaljšanje dovoljenja, ki je že poteklo, prebivajo nezakonito, razen če ni drugače določeno z nacionalno zakonodajo države članice (glej tudi oddelek 5.7).
stateless persons staying in the Member State in which, according to national law, they enjoy a right to stay during a statelessness determination procedure,
Državljani tretje države, za katere se je uporabil postopek vrnitve, določen v direktivi o vračanju, in ki nezakonito prebivajo na ozemlju države članice, pri čemer ni nobenega utemeljenega razloga za nevračanje (primer iz točke 48 sodbe Sodišča v zadevi Achughbabian, C-329/11 [9]), na tem ozemlju prebivajo nezakonito.
persons staying in a Member State where they enjoy a formal toleration status (provided such status is considered under national law as ‘legal stay’),
Posebna navedba Sodišča v zadevi Achughbabian se nanaša samo na združljivost nacionalnih kazenskopravnih ukrepov z direktivo o vračanju.
holders of a fraudulently acquired permit for as long as the permit has not been revoked or withdrawn and continues to be considered as valid permit.
Ta sodba ne obravnava področja uporabe in same uporabe direktive o vračanju, zato še vedno velja splošno pravilo iz člena 2(1): „A ali B“, kar pomeni, da oseba prebiva nezakonito in se zanjo direktiva o vračanju uporablja, ali pa ima oseba pravico do prebivanja in se zanjo ta direktiva ne uporablja.
Persons subject to a pending application for a residence permit may be either legally or illegally staying, depending on whether they hold a valid visa or another right to stay or not.
Pravna podlaga: direktiva o vračanju – člen 3(3)
The situation of illegal stay does not require a minimum duration of stay or the intention of the third-country national to stay illegally on the territory of a Member State — see judgment of the ECJ in Case C-47/15, Affum [8] (paragraph 48).Applicants for renewal of an already expired permit are illegally staying, unless national law of a Member State provides otherwise (see also section 5.7).
Pomeni proces vračanja državljana tretje države – bodisi prostovoljno izpolnitev obveznosti vrnitve ali prisilno vrnitev – v:
Third-country nationals to whom the return procedure established by the Return Directive had been applied and who are illegally staying in the territory of a Member State without there being any justified ground for non-return (scenario referred to in paragraph 48 of ECJ judgement in Case C-329/11, Achughbabian [9]) are illegally staying.
državo izvora, ali
The special reference made by ECJ in Achughbabian relates only to the compatibility of national criminal law measures with the Return Directive.
državo tranzita, v skladu s sporazumi Skupnosti ali dvostranskimi sporazumi o ponovnem sprejemu ali drugimi sporazumi, ali
Nothing is said in this judgement on the scope and applicability of the Return Directive, hence the general rule set by Article 2(1) remains applicable: ‘either A or B’, meaning that a person is either staying illegally and the Return Directive applies, or the persons enjoys a right to stay and the Return Directive does not apply.
drugo tretjo državo, v katero se zadevni državljan tretje države vrne prostovoljno, pod pogojem, da ga ta država sprejme.
Legal basis: Return Directive — Article 3(3)
Ta opredelitev vsebuje omejitve v zvezi s tem, kaj je za namene izvajanja direktive o vračanju mogoče sprejeti kot „vrnitev“ in česa ne.
Means the process of a third-country national going back — whether in voluntary compliance with an obligation to return, or enforced — to:
Vrnitve nezakonito prebivajočega državljana tretje države v drugo državo članico po pravu Unije ni mogoče šteti za „vrnitev“.
his or her country of origin; or
Tak ukrep pa je lahko izjemoma mogoč v skladu z dvostranskimi sporazumi o ponovnem sprejemu ali dublinskimi pravili; zato je priporočeno, da se ne imenuje „vrnitev“, ampak „vrnitev v drugo državo članico“ ali „predaja“.
a country of transit in accordance with Community or bilateral readmission agreements or other arrangements; or
Opredelitev tudi pomeni, da morajo države članice izvesti vrnitev v tretjo državo samo v primerih, ki so izčrpno navedeni v eni od treh alinej tega člena.
another third country, to which the third-country national concerned voluntarily decides to return and in which he or she will be accepted.
Zato osebe v postopku vračanja na primer brez njenega soglasja ni mogoče odstraniti v tretjo državo, ki ni država izvora ali država tranzita.
This definition contains limitations on what can be accepted as ‘return’ and what cannot be accepted as ‘return’ for the purposes of implementing the Return Directive.
„Država izvora“ iz prve alinee se nanaša na državo državljanstva državljana tretje države; pri osebah brez državljanstva se običajno lahko šteje, da je to država prejšnjega običajnega prebivališča.
Passing back an illegally staying third-country national to another Member State cannot be considered ‘return’ under Union law.
„Država tranzita“ iz druge alinee zajema samo tretje države, ne pa tudi držav članic EU.
Such action may, however, be exceptionally possible under bilateral readmission agreements or Dublin rules; it is therefore recommended not to call it ‘return’, but rather ‘passing-back’ or ‘transfer’.
„Sporazumi Skupnosti ali dvostranski sporazumi o ponovnem sprejemu ali drugi sporazumi“ iz druge alinee se nanašajo samo na sporazume s tretjimi državami.
The definition also implies that Member States must only carry out return to a third country in the circumstances exhaustively listed in one of its three indents.
Dvostranski sporazumi o ponovnem sprejemu med državami članicami se v tem okviru ne upoštevajo.
Therefore, for instance, it is not possible to remove a returnee to a third country, which is neither the country of origin nor the country of transit, without consent of the returnee.
Taki sporazumi med državami članicami pa lahko v določenih primerih dovoljujejo vrnitev migrantov brez urejenega statusa v druge države članice v skladu s členom 6(3) direktive o vračanju (glej oddelek 5.5 v nadaljevanju).
‘Country of origin’ in the first indent refers to the country of nationality of the third-country national; for stateless persons, this can normally be considered to be the country of former habitual residence.
Izraz „vrne prostovoljno“ iz tretje alinee ni enakovreden prostovoljnemu odhodu.
‘Country of transit’ in the second indent covers only third countries, not EU Member States.
„Prostovoljno“ v tem smislu se nanaša na to, da oseba v postopku vračanja izbere namembno državo.
‘Community or bilateral readmission agreements or other arrangements’ in the second indent relates to agreements with third countries only.
Namembna država se lahko prostovoljno izbere tudi med pripravami na postopek odstranitve: oseba v postopku vračanja bo v nekaterih primerih morda raje izbrala odstranitev v drugo tretjo državo kot pa v državo tranzita ali izvora.
Bilateral readmission agreements between Member States are irrelevant in this context.
Opredelitev države vrnitve v primeru odstranitve: če je bilo odobreno obdobje za prostovoljni odhod, je odgovornost osebe v postopku vračanja zagotoviti, da izpolni obveznost vrnitve v določenem roku, države vrnitve pa načeloma ni treba opredeliti.
Such agreements between Member States may, however, in certain cases allow for passing back of irregular migrants to other Member States under Article 6(3) of the Return Directive (see section 5.5 below).
V katero tretjo državo bo oseba odstranjena, je treba opredeliti samo, če morajo države članice uporabiti prisilne ukrepe (odstranitev) (glej oddelek 1.5).
The term ‘voluntarily decides to return’ in the third indent is not tantamount to voluntary departure.
Pravna podlaga: direktiva o vračanju – člena 3(4) in 6(6)
‘Voluntary’ in this context refers to the choice of the destination by the returnee.
Upravna ali sodna odločba ali akt, ki navaja ali opredeljuje, da je prebivanje državljana tretje države nezakonito, ter nalaga ali navaja obveznost vrnitve.
Such voluntary choice of the destination may also happen in the preparation of a removal operation: there may be cases in which the returnee prefers to be removed to another third country rather than to the country of transit or origin.
Opredelitev pojma „odločbe o vrnitvi“ se osredotoča na dva bistvena elementa.
Specification of the country of return in the case of removal: if a period for voluntary departure is granted, then it is the returnee's responsibility to make sure that he/she complies with the obligation to return within the set period and there is in principle no need to specify the country of return.
Odločba o vrnitvi mora zajemati:
Only if coercive measures have to be used by Member States (removal), then it is necessary to specify to which third country the person will be removed (see section 1.5).
navedbo glede nezakonitosti prebivanja in
Legal basis: Return Directive — Articles 3(4) and 6(6)
uvedbo obveznosti vrnitve.
An administrative or judicial decision or act, stating or declaring the stay of a third-country national to be illegal and imposing or stating an obligation to return.
Odločba o vrnitvi lahko zajema tudi dodatne elemente, na primer prepoved vstopa, obdobje za prostovoljni odhod in opredelitev države vrnitve; kadar država vrnitve ni navedena, morajo države članice zagotoviti, da se v skladu s členom 5 direktive o vračanju spoštuje načelo nevračanja.
The definition of a ‘return decision’ focuses on two essential elements.
Države članice imajo veliko svobode pri določanju oblike, s katero se lahko sprejme odločba o vrnitvi (sodna ali upravna odločba ali akt).
A return decision must contain:
Odločbe o vrnitvi se lahko izdajo v obliki samostojnega akta ali odločbe ali skupaj z drugimi odločbami, na primer ukrepom za prostovoljno vrnitev ali odstranitev ali odločbo o prenehanju zakonitega prebivanja (glej oddelek 12.1 v nadaljevanju).
a statement concerning the illegality of the stay; and
Odločba o vrnitvi določa, da je prebivanje nezakonito v tisti državi članici, ki izda odločbo, obenem pa navaja obveznost zapustitve ozemlja držav članic EU in pridruženih schengenskih držav.
the imposition of an obligation to return.
Treba je poudariti, da so v skladu s členom 11 odločbam o vrnitvi lahko priložene prepovedi vstopa z vseevropskim učinkom (ki so zavezujoče za vse države, ki jih zavezuje direktiva o vračanju).
A return decision may contain further elements, such as an entry ban, a voluntary departure period, designation of the country of return; when the country of return is not mentioned, Member States must ensure that the principle of non-refoulement is respected in accordance with Article 5 of the Return Directive.
Pravna podlaga: direktiva o vračanju – člena 3(5) in 8(3)
Member States enjoy wide discretion concerning the form (decision or act, judicial or administrative) in which a return decision may be adopted.
Upravna ali sodna odločba ali akt, ki nalaga izvršitev obveznosti vrnitve, in sicer fizični prevoz iz države članice.
Return decisions can be issued in the form of a self-standing act or decision or together with other decisions, such as a removal order or a decision ending legal stay (see section 12.1 below).
Ukrep za prostovoljno vrnitev ali odstranitev je mogoče izdati skupaj z odločbo o vrnitvi (enostopenjski postopek) ali ločeno od nje (dvostopenjski postopek).
A return decision states the illegality of stay in the Member State which issues the decision, while stating the obligation to leave the territories of the EU Member States and Schengen Associated countries.
Kadar sta odločba o vrnitvi in ukrep za prostovoljno vrnitev ali odstranitev izdana skupaj v enostopenjskem postopku in če je bilo odobreno obdobje za prostovoljni odhod, je treba jasno navesti, da se bo odstranitev izvedla samo, če obveznost vrnitve ni bila izpolnjena v obdobju za prostovoljni odhod.
The flexible definition of ‘return decision’ does not preclude the decision imposing the obligation to return from being taken in the form of a criminal judgment and in the context of criminal proceedings — see the judgment of the ECJ in Case C-430/11, Sagor [10] (paragraph 39).1.5.
Osebo v postopku vračanja je treba vnaprej obvestiti o namembni državi v okviru postopka odstranitve, da lahko izrazi kakršne koli razloge, zakaj bi lahko odstranitev v predlagano namembno državo pomenila kršitev načela nevračanja, in koristi pravico do pritožbe.
Legal basis: Return Directive — Articles 3(5) and 8(3)
Komisija priporoča, da se država vrnitve navede v ločeni odločbi o odstranitvi (dvostopenjski postopek) ali da se v združeni odločbi o vrnitvi in odstranitvi (enostopenjski postopek) navede država, v katero bo oseba odstranjena, če ne bo izpolnila obveznosti vrnitve, ali da se državljan tretje države obvesti z drugo odločbo ali aktom.
Administrative or judicial decision or act ordering the enforcement of the obligation to return, namely the physical transportation out of the Member State.
Pravna podlaga: direktiva o vračanju – člen 3(7), uvodna izjava 6
A removal order can either be issued together with a return decision (one-step procedure) or separately (two-step procedure).
V posameznem primeru obstajajo razlogi na podlagi objektivnih meril, opredeljenih z zakonom, zaradi katerih se domneva, da bi državljan tretje države, ki je v postopku vrnitve, lahko pobegnil.
In those cases in which return decision and removal order are issued together in a one-step procedure, it must be made clear — in those cases in which a period for voluntary departure is granted — that removal will only take place if the obligation to return within the period for voluntary departure has not been complied with.
To, ali „nevarnost pobega“ obstaja (ali ne), je odločilno pri določanju, ali bo obdobje za prostovoljni odhod odobreno ali ne, in odločanju, ali je potrebno pridržanje.
In view of the obligation of Member States to always respect the principle of non-refoulement, removal (physical transportation out of the Member State) cannot happen to an unspecified destination, but only to a specified country of return.
Države članice morajo svojo oceno o tem, ali obstaja nevarnost pobega, utemeljiti na objektivnih merilih iz nacionalne zakonodaje.
The returnee must be made aware of the destination of the removal operation in advance so that he or she can express any reasons for believing that removal to the proposed destination would be in breach of the principle of non-refoulement and is able to make use of the right to an appeal.
To posredno potrjuje sodba Sodišča v zadevi Al Chodor in drugi, C-528/15 [11], v zvezi z opredelitvijo „nevarnosti pobega“ iz člena 2(n) [12] dublinske uredbe, katerega besedilo je v bistvu enako opredelitvi iz člena 3(7) direktive o vračanju.