natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the purpose of concluding the contract of the Administrative Director, the EPPO shall be represented by the European Chief Prosecutor.
Člen 18
The term of office of the Administrative Director shall be 4 years.
Položaj upravnega direktorja
By the end of that period, the College shall undertake an assessment which takes into account an evaluation of the performance of the Administrative Director.
Upravni direktor se zaposli kot začasni uslužbenec EJT v skladu s členom 2(a) Pogojev za zaposlitev.
The College, acting on a proposal from the European Chief Prosecutor which takes into account the assessment referred to in paragraph 3, may extend once the term of office of the Administrative Director for a period of no more than 4 years.
Upravnega direktorja imenuje kolegij na podlagi seznama kandidatov, ki jih predlaga evropski glavni tožilec, in sicer po javnem in preglednem izbirnem postopku v skladu s poslovnikom EJT.
An Administrative Director whose term of office has been extended may not participate in another selection procedure for the same post at the end of the overall period.
Evropski glavni tožilec zastopa EJT za namen sklenitve pogodbe z upravnim direktorjem.
The Administrative Director shall be accountable to the European Chief Prosecutor and the College.
3.
Upon a decision of the College on the basis of a two-thirds majority of its members and without prejudice to the applicable rules pertaining to the termination of contract in the Staff Regulations and the Conditions of Employment, the Administrative Director may be removed from the EPPO.
Mandat upravnega direktorja je štiri leta.
Article 19
Kolegij pred koncem tega obdobja izvede oceno, v okviru katere upošteva oceno uspešnosti dela upravnega direktorja.
Responsibilities of the Administrative Director
Kolegij lahko na predlog evropskega glavnega tožilca, ki upošteva oceno iz odstavka 3, enkrat podaljša mandat upravnega direktorja za največ štiri leta.
For administrative and budgetary purposes, the EPPO shall be managed by its Administrative Director.
Upravni direktor, katerega mandat je bil podaljšan, na koncu celotnega obdobja ne sme sodelovati v novem izbirnem postopku za isto delovno mesto.
Without prejudice to the powers of the College or the European Chief Prosecutor, the Administrative Director shall be independent in the performance of his/her duties and shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government or any other body.
Upravni direktor odgovarja evropskemu glavnemu tožilcu in kolegiju.
The Administrative Director shall be the legal representative of the EPPO for administrative and budgetary purposes.
Upravni direktor je lahko razrešen s položaja EJT na podlagi sklepa kolegija, sprejetega z dvotretjinsko večino glasov članov, in brez poseganja v veljavna pravila iz Kadrovskih predpisov in Pogojev za zaposlitev, ki se nanašajo na odpoved pogodbe.
The Administrative Director shall implement the budget of the EPPO.
Člen 19
The Administrative Director shall be responsible for the implementation of the administrative tasks assigned to the EPPO, in particular:
Pristojnosti upravnega direktorja
the day-to-day administration of the EPPO and staff management;
EJT za upravne in proračunske namene vodi upravni direktor.
implementing the decisions adopted by the European Chief Prosecutor or the College;
Brez poseganja v pristojnosti kolegija ali evropskega glavnega tožilca je upravni direktor pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti neodvisen in ne sme zahtevati ali sprejemati nikakršnih navodil od vlad ali drugih organov.
preparing a proposal for the annual and multi-annual programming document and submitting it to the European Chief Prosecutor;
Upravni direktor je pravni zastopnik EJT za upravne in proračunske namene.
implementing the annual and multi-annual programming documents and reporting to the College on their implementation;
Proračun EJT izvršuje upravni direktor.
preparing the administrative and budgetary parts of the annual report on the EPPO’s activities;
Upravni direktor je odgovoren za izvajanje upravnih nalog, dodeljenih EJT, zlasti za:
preparing an action plan following-up on the conclusions of the internal or external audit reports, evaluations and investigations, including those of the European Data Protection Supervisor and OLAF and reporting to them and to the College twice a year;
vsakodnevno upravljanje EJT in kadrovsko upravljanje;
preparing an internal anti-fraud strategy for the EPPO and presenting it to the College for approval;
izvajanje sklepov, ki jih sprejme evropski glavni tožilec ali kolegij;
preparing a proposal for the draft financial rules applicable to the EPPO, and submitting it to the European Chief Prosecutor;
pripravo predloga letnega in večletnega programskega dokumenta in njegovo predložitev evropskemu glavnemu tožilcu;
preparing a proposal for the EPPO’s draft statement of estimates of revenues and expenditures, and submitting it to the European Chief Prosecutor;
izvajanje letnih in večletnih programskih dokumentov in poročanje kolegiju o njihovem izvajanju;
providing necessary administrative support to facilitate the operational work of the EPPO;
pripravo upravnih in proračunskih delov letnega poročila o dejavnostih EJT;
providing support to the European Chief Prosecutor and the Deputy European Chief Prosecutors in the carrying out of their duties.
pripravo akcijskega načrta za izvrševanje sklepnih ugotovitev notranjih ali zunanjih revizijskih poročil, vrednotenj in preiskav, vključno s poročili Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov in OLAF, ter poročanje obema tema uradoma in kolegiju dvakrat letno;
Article 20
pripravo notranje strategije EJT za boj proti goljufijam in njegovo predložitev kolegiju v odobritev;
Provisional administrative arrangements of the EPPO
pripravo predloga osnutka finančnih pravil, ki veljajo za EJT, in njegovo predložitev evropskemu glavnemu tožilcu;
Based on provisional budgetary appropriations allocated in its own budget, the Commission shall be responsible for the establishment and initial administrative operation of the EPPO until the latter has the capacity to implement its own budget.
pripravo predloga osnutka poročila EJT o oceni prihodkov in odhodkov ter njegovo predložitev evropskemu glavnemu tožilcu;
For that purpose the Commission may:
zagotavljanje potrebne upravne podpore za zagotovitev lažjega operativnega dela EJT;
designate, after consulting with the Council, a Commission official to act as interim Administrative Director and exercise the duties assigned to the Administrative Director, including the powers conferred by the Staff Regulations and the Conditions of Employment on the appointing authority regarding administrative staff of the EPPO, in respect of any staff positions which need to be filled before the Administrative Director takes up his or her duties in accordance with Article 18;
zagotavljanje podpore evropskemu glavnemu tožilcu in njegovim namestnikom pri opravljanju njihovih dolžnosti.
offer assistance to the EPPO, in particular by seconding a limited number of Commission officials necessary to carry out the administrative activities of the EPPO under the responsibility of the interim Administrative Director.
Člen 20
The interim Administrative Director may authorise all payments covered by appropriations entered in the EPPO’s budget and may conclude contracts, including staff contracts.
Začasna upravna ureditev EJT
Once the College takes up its duties in accordance with Article 9(1), the interim Administrative Director shall exercise his/her duties in accordance with Article 18.
Komisija je na podlagi začasnih proračunskih sredstev, dodeljenih iz lastnega proračuna, odgovorna za ustanovitev in začetno upravno delovanje EJT, dokler ETJ ni sposobno izvrševati lastnega proračuna.
The interim Administrative Director shall cease to exercise that function once the Administrative Director has taken up duties following appointment by the College in accordance with Article 18.
V ta namen lahko Komisija:
Until the College takes up its duties in accordance with Article 9(1), the Commission shall exercise its functions set out in this Article in consultation with a group of experts composed of representatives of the Member States.
po posvetovanju s Svetom imenuje uradnika Komisije, ki deluje kot začasni upravni direktor in opravlja dolžnosti, dodeljene upravnemu direktorju, vključno z izvajanjem pooblastil, ki jih ima organ za imenovanje na podlagi Kadrovskih predpisov in Pogojev za zaposlitev, v zvezi z upravnim osebjem EJT in kadrovskimi položaji, ki jih je treba zapolniti, preden upravni direktor prevzame dolžnosti v skladu s členom 18;
SECTION 3
zagotavlja pomoč EJT, zlasti z napotitvijo omejenega števila uradnikov Komisije, ki so potrebni za izvajanje upravnih dejavnosti EJT pod odgovornostjo začasnega upravnega direktorja.
Internal rules of procedure of the EPPO
Začasni upravni direktor lahko odobri vsa plačila, krita z odobritvami v proračunu EJT, in lahko sklepa pogodbe, vključno s pogodbami o zaposlitvi osebja.
Article 21
Ko kolegij prevzame svoje dolžnosti v skladu s členom 9(1), začasni upravni direktor svoje dolžnosti opravlja v skladu s členom 18.
The organisation of the work of the EPPO shall be governed by its internal rules of procedure
Začasni upravni direktor preneha opravljati to funkcijo, ko začne svoje dolžnosti opravljati upravni direktor, ki ga imenuje kolegij v skladu s členom 18.
Once the EPPO has been set up, the European Chief Prosecutor shall without delay prepare a proposal for the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO, to be adopted by the College by a two-thirds majority.
Dokler kolegij ne prevzame svojih dolžnosti v skladu s členom 9(1), Komisija opravlja svoje funkcije, določene v tem členu, v posvetovanju s skupino strokovnjakov, sestavljeno iz predstavnikov držav članic.
Modifications to the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO may be proposed by any European Prosecutor and shall be adopted if the College so decides by a two-thirds majority.
ODDELEK 3
CHAPTER IV
Poslovnik EJT
COMPETENCE AND EXERCISE OF THE COMPETENCE OF THE EPPO
Člen 21
Competence of the EPPO
Organizacijo dela EJT ureja njegov poslovnik.
Article 22
Potem ko bo EJT vzpostavljeno, evropski glavni tožilec brez odlašanja pripravi predlog poslovnika EJT, ki ga kolegij sprejme z dvotretjinsko večino.
Material competence of the EPPO
Spremembe poslovnika EJT lahko predlaga vsak evropski tožilec, sprejmejo pa se, če tako odloči kolegij z dvotretjinsko večino.
The EPPO shall be competent in respect of the criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union that are provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/1371, as implemented by national law, irrespective of whether the same criminal conduct could be classified as another type of offence under national law.
POGLAVJE IV
As regards offences referred to in point (d) of Article 3(2) of Directive (EU) 2017/1371, as implemented by national law, the EPPO shall only be competent when the intentional acts or omissions defined in that provision are connected with the territory of two or more Member States and involve a total damage of at least EUR 10 million.
PRISTOJNOSTI EJT IN NJIHOVO IZVAJANJE
The EPPO shall also be competent for any other criminal offence that is inextricably linked to criminal conduct that falls within the scope of paragraph 1 of this Article.
Člen 22
The competence with regard to such criminal offences may only be exercised in conformity with Article 25(3).
Stvarna pristojnost EJT
In any case, the EPPO shall not be competent for criminal offences in respect of national direct taxes including offences inextricably linked thereto.
EJT je pristojno za kazniva dejanja, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, določena v Direktivi (EU) 2017/1371, kakor se izvaja z nacionalnim pravom, ne glede na to, ali se enako kaznivo ravnanje lahko klasificira kot druga vrsta kaznivega dejanja na podlagi nacionalnega prava.
The structure and functioning of the tax administration of the Member States shall not be affected by this Regulation.
Kar zadeva kazniva dejanja iz točke (d) člena 3(2) Direktive (EU) 2017/1371, kakor se izvaja z nacionalnim pravom, je EJT pristojno le, kadar naklepna dejanja ali opustitve dejanj, opredeljeni v navedeni določbi, zadevajo ozemlje dveh ali več držav članic in skupna škoda znaša vsaj 10 milijonov EUR.
Article 23
EJT je pristojno tudi za kazniva dejanja, povezana s sodelovanjem v hudodelski združbi, kot so opredeljena v Okvirnem Sklepu 2008/841/PNZ, kakor se izvaja z nacionalnim pravom, če je namen kriminalne dejavnosti takšne hudodelske združbe storitev katerega koli izmed kaznivih dejanj iz odstavka 1.
Territorial and personal competence of the EPPO
EJT je pristojno tudi za vsa druga kazniva dejanja, ki so neločljivo povezana s kaznivim ravnanjem, ki spada v področje uporabe odstavka 1 tega člena.
The EPPO shall be competent for the offences referred to in Article 22 where such offences:
Pristojnosti v zvezi s takšnimi kaznivimi dejanji se lahko izvajajo samo v skladu s členom 25(3).
were committed in whole or in part within the territory of one or several Member States;
Člen 23
were committed by a national of a Member State, provided that a Member State has jurisdiction for such offences when committed outside its territory, or
Krajevna in osebna pristojnost EJT
were committed outside the territories referred to in point (a) by a person who was subject to the Staff Regulations or to the Conditions of Employment, at the time of the offence, provided that a Member State has jurisdiction for such offences when committed outside its territory.
EJT je pristojno za kazniva dejanja iz člena 22, če:
Exercise of the competence of the EPPO
so bila ta kazniva dejanja v celoti ali deloma storjena na ozemlju ene ali več držav članic;
Article 24
jih je storil državljan države članice, pod pogojem, da ima država članica pristojnost za takšna kazniva dejanja, kadar so storjena zunaj njenega ozemlja, ali
Reporting, registration and verification of information
jih je zunaj ozemelj iz točke (a) storila oseba, za katero so ob storitvi kaznivega dejanja veljali Kadrovski predpisi ali Pogoji za zaposlitev, pod pogojem, da ima država članica pristojnost za takšna kazniva dejanja, kadar so storjena zunaj njenega ozemlja.
The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union and the authorities of the Member States competent under applicable national law shall without undue delay report to the EPPO any criminal conduct in respect of which it could exercise its competence in accordance with Article 22, Article 25(2) and (3).
Izvajanje pristojnosti EJT
When a judicial or law enforcement authority of a Member State initiates an investigation in respect of a criminal offence for which the EPPO could exercise its competence in accordance with Article 22, Article 25(2) and (3), or where, at any time after the initiation of an investigation, it appears to the competent judicial or law enforcement authority of a Member State that an investigation concerns such an offence, that authority shall without undue delay inform the EPPO so that the latter can decide whether to exercise its right of evocation in accordance with Article 27.
Člen 24
When a judicial or law enforcement authority of a Member State initiates an investigation in respect of a criminal offence as defined in Article 22 and considers that the EPPO could, in accordance with Article 25(3), not exercise its competence, it shall inform the EPPO thereof.
Poročanje, evidentiranje in preverjanje informacij
The report shall contain, as a minimum, a description of the facts, including an assessment of the damage caused or likely to be caused, the possible legal qualification and any available information about potential victims, suspects and any other involved persons.
Institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Unije ter organi držav članic, ki so pristojni na podlagi veljavnega nacionalnega prava, brez nepotrebnega odlašanja poročajo EJT o vsakem kaznivem ravnanju, za katero bi lahko izvajalo svojo pristojnost v skladu s členom 22 ter členom 25(2) in (3).
The EPPO shall also be informed, in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, of cases where an assessment of whether the criteria in Article 25(2) are met is not possible.
Kadar sodni organ ali organ pregona države članice sproži preiskavo kaznivega dejanja, v zvezi s katerim bi EJT lahko izvajalo svojo pristojnost v skladu s členom 22 ter členom 25(2) in (3), ali kadar pristojni sodni organ ali pristojni organ pregona države članice kadar koli od začetka preiskave meni, da preiskava zadeva takšno kaznivo dejanje, ta organ brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvesti EJT, tako da to lahko odloči, ali bo uveljavljalo pravico do prevzema zadeve v skladu s členom 27.
Information provided to the EPPO shall be registered and verified in accordance with its internal rules of procedure.
Kadar sodni organ ali organ pregona države članice sproži preiskavo kaznivega dejanja, kakor je opredeljeno v členu 22, in meni, da EJT v skladu s členom 25(3) ne bi moglo izvajati svoje pristojnost, o tem obvesti EJT.
The verification shall assess whether, on the basis of the information provided in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2, there are grounds to initiate an investigation or to exercise the right of evocation.
Poročilo vsebuje vsaj opis dejstev, vključno z oceno škode, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena, morebitno pravno kvalifikacijo in vse razpoložljive informacije o morebitnih žrtvah, osumljencih in drugih vpletenih osebah.
Where upon verification the EPPO decides that there are no grounds to initiate an investigation in accordance with Article 26, or to exercise its right of evocation in accordance with Article 27, the reasons shall be noted in the case management system.
EJT se v skladu z odstavkoma 1 in 2 tega člena obvesti tudi o primerih, ko ni mogoče oceniti, ali so izpolnjena merila iz člena 25(2).
The EPPO shall inform the authority that reported the criminal conduct in accordance with paragraph 1 or 2, as well as crime victims and if so provided by national law, other persons who reported the criminal conduct.
Informacije, posredovane EJT, se evidentirajo in preverijo v skladu z njegovim poslovnikom.
Where it comes to the knowledge of the EPPO that a criminal offence outside of the scope of the competence of the EPPO may have been committed, it shall without undue delay inform the competent national authorities and forward all relevant evidence to them.
S preverjanjem se oceni, ali na podlagi informacij, predloženih v skladu z odstavkoma 1 in 2, obstajajo razlogi za začetek preiskave ali uveljavljanje pravice do prevzema zadeve.
In specific cases, the EPPO may request further relevant information available to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union and the authorities of the Member States.
Če EJT po preverjanju odloči, da ni podlage za začetek preiskave v skladu s členom 26 ali uveljavljanje pravice do prevzema zadeve v skladu s členom 27, se razlogi zapišejo v sistem vodenja zadev.
The requested information may concern infringements which caused damage to the Union’s financial interests, other than those within the competence of the EPPO in accordance with Article 25(2).
EJT obvesti organ, ki je poročal o kaznivem ravnanju v skladu z odstavkoma 1 ali 2, ter žrtve kaznivega dejanja in, če je tako določeno v nacionalnem pravu, druge osebe, ki so poročale o kaznivem ravnanju.
The EPPO may request other information in order to enable the College, in accordance with Article 9(2), to issue general guidelines on the interpretation of the obligation to inform the EPPO of cases falling within the scope of Article 25(2).
Če EJT izve, da bi lahko bilo storjeno kaznivo dejanje zunaj obsega pristojnosti EJT, o tem brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvesti pristojne nacionalne organe in jim posreduje vse ustrezne dokaze.
Article 25
EJT lahko v posebnih primerih zahteva dodatne ustrezne informacije, ki so na voljo institucijam, organom, uradom in agencijam Unije ter organom držav članic.
The EPPO shall exercise its competence either by initiating an investigation under Article 26 or by deciding to use its right of evocation under Article 27.
Zahtevane informacije se lahko nanašajo na kršitve, s katerimi je bila povzročena škoda finančnim interesom Unije, vendar niso tiste, ki so v pristojnosti EJT v skladu s členom 25(2).
If the EPPO decides to exercise its competence, the competent national authorities shall not exercise their own competence in respect of the same criminal conduct.
EJT lahko zahteva tudi druge informacije, da bi omogočili kolegiju, da v skladu s členom 9(2) izda splošne smernice o razlagi obveznosti glede obveščanja EJT o zadevah, ki spadajo v področje uporabe člena 25(2).
Where a criminal offence that falls within the scope of Article 22 caused or is likely to cause damage to the Union’s financial interests of less than EUR 10000, the EPPO may only exercise its competence if:
Člen 25
the case has repercussions at Union level which require an investigation to be conducted by the EPPO; or
EJT izvaja svojo pristojnost bodisi tako, da sproži preiskavo na podlagi člena 26, ali tako, da se odloči uporabiti pravico do prevzema zadeve na podlagi člena 27.
officials or other servants of the Union, or members of the institutions of the Union could be suspected of having committed the offence.
Če se odloči za izvajanje pristojnosti, pristojni nacionalni organi ne smejo izvajati svoje pristojnosti v zvezi z istim kaznivim ravnanjem.
The EPPO shall, where appropriate, consult the competent national authorities or bodies of the Union to establish whether the criteria set out in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph are met.
Če je kaznivo dejanje, ki spada v področje uporabe člena 22, povzročilo ali bi lahko povzročilo škodo finančnim interesom Unije v višini manj kot 10000 EUR, lahko EJT izvaja svoje pristojnosti le, če:
The EPPO shall refrain from exercising its competence in respect of any offence falling within the scope of Article 22 and shall, upon consultation with the competent national authorities, refer the case without undue delay to the latter in accordance with Article 34 if:
ima zadeva posledice na ravni Unije, zaradi katerih je potrebno, da EJT opravi preiskavo, ali
the maximum sanction provided for by national law for an offence falling within the scope of Article 22(1) is equal to or less severe than the maximum sanction for an inextricably linked offence as referred to in Article 22(3) unless the latter offence has been instrumental to commit the offence falling within the scope of Article 22(1); or
bi lahko bili uradniki ali drugi uslužbenci Unije ali člani institucij Unije osumljeni storitve kaznivega dejanja.
there is a reason to assume that the damage caused or likely to be caused, to the Union’s financial interests by an offence as referred to in Article 22 does not exceed the damage caused, or likely to be caused to another victim.
EJT se po potrebi posvetuje s pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi ali organi Unije, da ugotovi, ali so izpolnjena merila iz točk (a) in (b) prvega pododstavka.
Point (b) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall not apply to offences referred to in Article 3(2)(a), (b) and (d) of Directive (EU) 2017/1371 as implemented by national law.
EJT ne izvaja svoje pristojnosti v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji s področja uporabe člena 22 in zadevo po posvetovanju s pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi brez nepotrebnega odlašanja odstopi tem organom v skladu s členom 34, če:
The EPPO may, with the consent of the competent national authorities, exercise its competence for offences referred to in Article 22 in cases which would otherwise be excluded due to application of paragraph 3(b) of this Article if it appears that the EPPO is better placed to investigate or prosecute.
je najvišja sankcija, predpisana v nacionalnem pravu za kaznivo dejanje s področja uporabe člena 22(1), enaka ali manj stroga kot najvišja sankcija za neločljivo povezano kaznivo dejanje iz člena 22(3), razen če je to drugo kaznivo dejanje prispevalo k storitvi kaznivega dejanja s področja uporabe člena 22(1), ali