natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such types of processing operations may be those which in, particular, involve using new technologies, or are of a new kind and where no data protection impact assessment has been carried out before by the controller, or where they become necessary in the light of the time that has elapsed since the initial processing.
Ta ocena učinka pa bi morala obsegati zlasti ukrepe, zaščitne ukrepe in mehanizme, ki so načrtovani za ublažitev tega tveganja, zagotavljanje varstva osebnih podatkov in dokazovanje skladnosti s to uredbo.
In such cases, a data protection impact assessment should be carried out by the controller prior to the processing in order to assess the particular likelihood and severity of the high risk, taking into account the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing and the sources of the risk.
To bi moralo veljati zlasti za obsežna dejanja obdelave, ki so namenjena obdelavi precejšnje količine osebnih podatkov na regionalni, nacionalni ali nadnacionalni ravni in bi lahko vplivali na veliko število posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, ter za katere je verjetno, da bodo povzročila veliko tveganje, na primer zaradi njihove občutljivosti, kadar se v skladu z doseženo stopnjo tehnološkega znanja uporablja nova tehnologija v velikem obsegu, ter tudi za druga dejanja obdelave, ki povzročajo veliko tveganje za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, zlasti kadar ta dejanja posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, otežijo uresničevanje njihovih pravic.
That impact assessment should include, in particular, the measures, safeguards and mechanisms envisaged for mitigating that risk, ensuring the protection of personal data and demonstrating compliance with this Regulation.
Oceno učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov bi bilo treba izvesti tudi, kadar se osebni podatki obdelujejo za sprejemanje odločitev v zvezi z določenimi posamezniki po kakršnem koli sistematičnem in obsežnem vrednotenju osebnih vidikov v zvezi s posamezniki na podlagi oblikovanja profilov teh podatkov ali po obdelavi posebnih vrst osebnih podatkov, biometričnih podatkov ali podatkov o kazenskih obsodbah in prekrških ali s tem povezanih varnostnih ukrepih.
This should in particular apply to large-scale processing operations which aim to process a considerable amount of personal data at regional, national or supranational level and which could affect a large number of data subjects and which are likely to result in a high risk, for example, on account of their sensitivity, where in accordance with the achieved state of technological knowledge a new technology is used on a large scale as well as to other processing operations which result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular where those operations render it more difficult for data subjects to exercise their rights.
Ocena učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov se zahteva tudi za spremljanje javno dostopnih območij v velikem obsegu, zlasti z uporabo optično-elektronskih naprav, ali za katera koli druga dejanja, za katera pristojni nadzorni organ meni, da bo obdelava verjetno povzročila veliko tveganje za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, zlasti ker tem posameznikom preprečujejo uresničevanje pravice ali uporabo storitve ali pogodbe ali ker se sistematično izvajajo v velikem obsegu.
A data protection impact assessment should also be made where personal data are processed for taking decisions regarding specific natural persons following any systematic and extensive evaluation of personal aspects relating to natural persons based on profiling those data or following the processing of special categories of personal data, biometric data, or data on criminal convictions and offences or related security measures.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov se ne bi smela šteti kot obdelava v velikem obsegu, če gre za obdelavo osebnih podatkov pacientov ali strank s strani posameznega zdravnika,drugega zdravstvenega delavca ali odvetnika.
A data protection impact assessment is equally required for monitoring publicly accessible areas on a large scale, especially when using optic-electronic devices or for any other operations where the competent supervisory authority considers that the processing is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular because they prevent data subjects from exercising a right or using a service or a contract, or because they are carried out systematically on a large scale.
V takih primerih ocena učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov ne bi smela biti obvezna.
The processing of personal data should not be considered to be on a large scale if the processing concerns personal data from patients or clients by an individual physician, other health care professional or lawyer.
V nekaterih okoliščinah je razumno in gospodarno, da je predmet ocene učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov obširnejši in ne obsega samo enega projekta, na primer kadar nameravajo javni organi ali telesa vzpostaviti skupno platformo za uporabo ali obdelavo ali kadar namerava več upravljavcev uvesti skupno okolje za uporabo ali obdelavo v celotnem industrijskem sektorju ali njegovem delu ali za horizontalno dejavnost v široki rabi.
In such cases, a data protection impact assessment should not be mandatory.
V okviru sprejetja prava držav članic, na katerem temelji opravljanje nalog javnega organa ali telesa in ki ureja zadevne posebna dejanja obdelave ali nize dejanj, lahko države članice menijo, da je treba tako oceno opraviti pred dejavnostmi obdelave.
There are circumstances under which it may be reasonable and economical for the subject of a data protection impact assessment to be broader than a single project, for example where public authorities or bodies intend to establish a common application or processing platform or where several controllers plan to introduce a common application or processing environment across an industry sector or segment or for a widely used horizontal activity.
Kadar ocena učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov pokaže, da bi zaradi neobstoječih zaščitnih ukrepov, varnostnih ukrepov in mehanizmov za ublažitev tveganja obdelava povzročila veliko tveganje za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov, in upravljavec meni, da tveganja ni mogoče ublažiti z razumnimi sredstvi v smislu razpoložljivih tehnologij in stroškov izvajanja, bi moralo biti pred začetkom dejavnosti obdelave opravljeno posvetovanje z nadzornim organom.
In the context of the adoption of the Member State law on which the performance of the tasks of the public authority or public body is based and which regulates the specific processing operation or set of operations in question, Member States may deem it necessary to carry out such assessment prior to the processing activities.
Za tako veliko tveganje je verjetno, da izhaja iz določenih vrst obdelave ter določenega obsega in pogostosti obdelave, kar lahko povzroči tudi škodo za pravice in svoboščine posameznika ali poseg vanje.
Where a data protection impact assessment indicates that the processing would, in the absence of safeguards, security measures and mechanisms to mitigate the risk, result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons and the controller is of the opinion that the risk cannot be mitigated by reasonable means in terms of available technologies and costs of implementation, the supervisory authority should be consulted prior to the start of processing activities.
Nadzorni organ bi se moral na zahtevo po posvetovanju odzvati v določenem obdobju.
Such high risk is likely to result from certain types of processing and the extent and frequency of processing, which may result also in a realisation of damage or interference with the rights and freedoms of the natural person.
Vendar odsotnost odziva nadzornega organa v tem obdobju ne bi smela posegati v kakršno koli posredovanje tega organa v skladu z njegovimi nalogami in pooblastili iz te uredbe, vključno s pooblastilom za prepoved dejanj obdelave.
The supervisory authority should respond to the request for consultation within a specified period.
Rezultat ocene učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov, ki se izvede v zvezi z zadevno obdelavo, se lahko kot del tega postopka posvetovanja predloži nadzornemu organu, zlasti ukrepi, ki so predvideni za ublažitev tveganja za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov.
However, the absence of a reaction of the supervisory authority within that period should be without prejudice to any intervention of the supervisory authority in accordance with its tasks and powers laid down in this Regulation, including the power to prohibit processing operations.
Obdelovalec bi moral upravljavcu po potrebi in na zahtevo pomagati pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz izvedbe ocene učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov in predhodnega posvetovanja z nadzornim organom.
As part of that consultation process, the outcome of a data protection impact assessment carried out with regard to the processing at issue may be submitted to the supervisory authority, in particular the measures envisaged to mitigate the risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons.
Prav tako bi bilo treba opraviti posvetovanje z nadzornim organom pri oblikovanju zakonodajnega ali regulativnega ukrepa o obdelavi osebnih podatkov, da bi zagotovili skladnost načrtovane obdelave s to uredbo in zlasti ublažili tveganje za posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki.
The processor should assist the controller, where necessary and upon request, in ensuring compliance with the obligations deriving from the carrying out of data protection impact assessments and from prior consultation of the supervisory authority.
Kadar obdelavo izvaja javni organ, razen sodišč ali neodvisnih pravosodnih organov, kadar delujejo kot sodni organi, ali kadar v zasebnem sektorju obdelavo izvaja upravljavec, katerega temeljne dejavnosti obsegajo dejanja obdelave, ki zahtevajo obsežno redno in sistematično spremljanje posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, ali kadar temeljne dejavnosti upravljavca ali obdelovalca zajemajo obsežno obdelavo posebnih vrst osebnih podatkov in podatkov v zvezi s kazenskimi obsodbami in prekrški, bi morala upravljavcu ali obdelovalcu pri spremljanju notranje skladnosti s to uredbo pomagati oseba s strokovnim znanjem s področja prava o varstvu podatkov in poznavanjem zadevnih praks.
A consultation of the supervisory authority should also take place in the course of the preparation of a legislative or regulatory measure which provides for the processing of personal data, in order to ensure compliance of the intended processing with this Regulation and in particular to mitigate the risk involved for the data subject.
V zasebnem sektorju se temeljne dejavnosti upravljavca nanašajo na njegove osnovne dejavnosti in ne na obdelavo osebnih podatkov kot postranske dejavnosti.
Where the processing is carried out by a public authority, except for courts or independent judicial authorities when acting in their judicial capacity, where, in the private sector, processing is carried out by a controller whose core activities consist of processing operations that require regular and systematic monitoring of the data subjects on a large scale, or where the core activities of the controller or the processor consist of processing on a large scale of special categories of personal data and data relating to criminal convictions and offences, a person with expert knowledge of data protection law and practices should assist the controller or processor to monitor internal compliance with this Regulation.
Določiti bi bilo treba stopnjo potrebnega strokovnega znanja, zlasti glede na izvedena dejanja obdelave podatkov in varstvo, ki je potrebno pri osebnih podatkih, obdelanih s strani upravljavca ali obdelovalca.
In the private sector, the core activities of a controller relate to its primary activities and do not relate to the processing of personal data as ancillary activities.
Taka pooblaščena oseba za varstvo podatkov bi morala svoje dolžnosti in naloge izvajati neodvisno, ne glede na to, ali je pri upravljavcu zaposlena ali ne.
The necessary level of expert knowledge should be determined in particular according to the data processing operations carried out and the protection required for the personal data processed by the controller or the processor.
Združenja ali druga telesa, ki predstavljajo vrste upravljavcev ali obdelovalcev, bi bilo treba spodbujati, da v okviru omejitev iz te uredbe in ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti obdelave, ki se izvaja na nekaterih področjih, ter posebnih potreb mikro, malih in srednjih podjetij, pripravijo kodekse ravnanja za pospeševanje učinkovite uporabe te uredbe.
Such data protection officers, whether or not they are an employee of the controller, should be in a position to perform their duties and tasks in an independent manner.
S takimi kodeksi ravnanja bi lahko določili obveznosti upravljavcev in obdelovalcev ob upoštevanju tveganja za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov, ki bo verjetno izhajalo iz obdelave.
Associations or other bodies representing categories of controllers or processors should be encouraged to draw up codes of conduct, within the limits of this Regulation, so as to facilitate the effective application of this Regulation, taking account of the specific characteristics of the processing carried out in certain sectors and the specific needs of micro, small and medium enterprises.
Pri oblikovanju kodeksov ravnanja ali pri njihovem spreminjanju ali razširjanju bi se morala združenja in druga telesa, ki predstavljajo vrste upravljavcev ali obdelovalcev, posvetovati z zadevnimi deležniki, po možnosti tudi s posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, ter upoštevati prejete prispevke in izražena stališča v odziv na taka posvetovanja.
In particular, such codes of conduct could calibrate the obligations of controllers and processors, taking into account the risk likely to result from the processing for the rights and freedoms of natural persons.
Za povečanje preglednosti in skladnosti s to uredbo bi bilo treba spodbujati uvedbo mehanizmov potrjevanja ter pečatov in označb za varstvo podatkov, ki bi posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, omogočili, da hitro ocenijo raven varstva podatkov zadevnih proizvodov in storitev.
When drawing up a code of conduct, or when amending or extending such a code, associations and other bodies representing categories of controllers or processors should consult relevant stakeholders, including data subjects where feasible, and have regard to submissions received and views expressed in response to such consultations.
Prenosi osebnih podatkov v države zunaj Unije in mednarodne organizacije ter iz njih so potrebni za razvoj mednarodne trgovine in mednarodnega sodelovanja.
In order to enhance transparency and compliance with this Regulation, the establishment of certification mechanisms and data protection seals and marks should be encouraged, allowing data subjects to quickly assess the level of data protection of relevant products and services.
Povečanje takih prenosov je prineslo nove izzive in skrbi glede varstva osebnih podatkov.
Flows of personal data to and from countries outside the Union and international organisations are necessary for the expansion of international trade and international cooperation.
Vendar kadar se osebni podatki prenašajo iz Unije upravljavcem, obdelovalcem ali drugim uporabnikom v tretjih državah ali mednarodnim organizacijam, raven varstva posameznikov, ki jo v Uniji zagotavlja ta uredba, ne bi smela biti ogrožena, vključno v primeru nadaljnjih prenosov osebnih podatkov iz tretje države ali mednarodne organizacije upravljavcem, obdelovalcem v isti ali drugi tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji.
The increase in such flows has raised new challenges and concerns with regard to the protection of personal data.
V vsakem primeru se lahko prenosi v tretje države in mednarodne organizacije izvajajo samo v popolni skladnosti s to uredbo.
However, when personal data are transferred from the Union to controllers, processors or other recipients in third countries or to international organisations, the level of protection of natural persons ensured in the Union by this Regulation should not be undermined, including in cases of onward transfers of personal data from the third country or international organisation to controllers, processors in the same or another third country or international organisation.
Prenos bi se lahko izvedel le, če upravljavec ali obdelovalec v skladu z drugimi določbami te uredbe izpolnjuje pogoje iz določb te uredbe v zvezi s prenosom podatkov v tretje države ali mednarodne organizacije.
In any event, transfers to third countries and international organisations may only be carried out in full compliance with this Regulation.
Ta uredba ne posega v mednarodne sporazume, ki so sklenjeni med Unijo in tretjimi državami ter urejajo prenos osebnih podatkov, vključno z ustreznimi zaščitnimi ukrepi za posameznike, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
A transfer could take place only if, subject to the other provisions of this Regulation, the conditions laid down in the provisions of this Regulation relating to the transfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations are complied with by the controller or processor.
Države članice lahko sklepajo mednarodne sporazume, ki vključujejo prenos osebnih podatkov v tretje države ali mednarodne organizacije, če taki sporazumi ne vplivajo na to uredbo ali katere koli druge določbe prava Unije in vključujejo ustrezno raven varstva temeljnih pravic posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
This Regulation is without prejudice to international agreements concluded between the Union and third countries regulating the transfer of personal data including appropriate safeguards for the data subjects.
Komisija lahko sklene – z učinkom za celotno Unijo –, da tretja država. ozemlje ali določeni sektor v tretji državi ali mednarodna organizacija nudi ustrezno raven varstva podatkov, s čimer zagotavlja pravno varnost in enotnost po vsej Uniji v zvezi s tretjo državo ali mednarodno organizacijo, za katero velja, da zagotavlja takšno raven varstva.
Member States may conclude international agreements which involve the transfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations, as far as such agreements do not affect this Regulation or any other provisions of Union law and include an appropriate level of protection for the fundamental rights of the data subjects.
V takih primerih se lahko prenosi osebnih podatkov v to tretjo državo ali mednarodno organizacijo opravijo brez potrebe po pridobitvi dodatnega dovoljenja.
The Commission may decide with effect for the entire Union that a third country, a territory or specified sector within a third country, or an international organisation, offers an adequate level of data protection, thus providing legal certainty and uniformity throughout the Union as regards the third country or international organisation which is considered to provide such level of protection.
Komisija lahko, potem ko tretjo državo ali mednarodno organizacijo obvesti in ji predloži celotno izjavo z navedbo razlogov, takšno odločitev tudi prekliče
In such cases, transfers of personal data to that third country or international organisation may take place without the need to obtain any further authorisation.
Komisija bi morala v skladu s temeljnimi vrednotami, na katerih temelji Unija, zlasti z varstvom človekovih pravic, v svoji oceni tretje države ali ozemlja ali določenega sektorja v tretji državi upoštevati, v kolikšni meri posamezna tretja država spoštuje načelo pravne države, dostop do pravnega varstva, pa tudi mednarodna pravila in standarde na področju človekovih pravic ter svojo splošno in področno zakonodajo, med drugim zakonodajo na področju javne varnosti, obrambe, nacionalne varnosti ter javnega reda in kazenskega prava.
The Commission may also decide, having given notice and a full statement setting out the reasons to the third country or international organisation, to revoke such a decision.
Pri sprejetju sklepa o ustreznosti glede ozemlja ali določenega sektorja v tretji državi bi bilo treba upoštevati jasna in objektivna merila, kot so posebne dejavnosti obdelave ter področje uporabe veljavnih pravnih standardov in veljavne zakonodaje v tretji državi.
In line with the fundamental values on which the Union is founded, in particular the protection of human rights, the Commission should, in its assessment of the third country, or of a territory or specified sector within a third country, take into account how a particular third country respects the rule of law, access to justice as well as international human rights norms and standards and its general and sectoral law, including legislation concerning public security, defence and national security as well as public order and criminal law.
Tretja država bi morala nuditi jamstva, ki zagotavljajo ustrezno raven varstva, ki je v osnovi enakovredna tisti, zagotovljeni v Uniji, zlasti kadar se osebni podatki obdelujejo v enem ali več določenih sektorjih.
The adoption of an adequacy decision with regard to a territory or a specified sector in a third country should take into account clear and objective criteria, such as specific processing activities and the scope of applicable legal standards and legislation in force in the third country.
Zlasti bi morala zagotavljati učinkovit neodvisen nadzor varstva podatkov ter mehanizme sodelovanja z organi za varstvo podatkov držav članic, posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, pa bi morali imeti učinkovite in izvršljive pravice ter dostop do učinkovitega upravnega in sodnega varstva.
The third country should offer guarantees ensuring an adequate level of protection essentially equivalent to that ensured within the Union, in particular where personal data are processed in one or several specific sectors.
Poleg mednarodnih zavez, ki jih sprejme tretja država ali mednarodna organizacija, bi morala Komisija upoštevati tudi obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz sodelovanja tretje države ali mednarodne organizacije v večstranskih ali regionalnih sistemih, zlasti v povezavi z varstvom osebnih podatkov, ter izvajanje takih obveznosti.
In particular, the third country should ensure effective independent data protection supervision and should provide for cooperation mechanisms with the Member States' data protection authorities, and the data subjects should be provided with effective and enforceable rights and effective administrative and judicial redress.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba zlasti pristop tretje države h Konvenciji Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov in Dodatnemu protokolu h Konvenciji.
Apart from the international commitments the third country or international organisation has entered into, the Commission should take account of obligations arising from the third country's or international organisation's participation in multilateral or regional systems in particular in relation to the protection of personal data, as well as the implementation of such obligations.
Pri oceni ravni varstva v tretjih državah ali mednarodnih organizacijah bi se Komisija morala posvetovati z odborom.
In particular, the third country's accession to the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Automatic Processing of Personal Data and its Additional Protocol should be taken into account.
Komisija bi morala spremljati delovanje sklepov o ravni varstva v tretji državi, na ozemlju ali v določenem sektorju v tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji, in spremljati delovanje odločitev, sprejetih na podlagi člena 25(6) ali člena 26(4) Direktive 95/46/ES.
The Commission should consult the Board when assessing the level of protection in third countries or international organisations.
V svojih sklepih o ustreznosti bi morala Komisija zagotoviti mehanizem za redno pregledovanje njihovega delovanja.