natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission initiated an expiry review investigation of the anti-dumping measures by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [13] on 5 December 2015.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/1403 [11] umaknila svoje sprejetje zaveze za še enega od proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The Commission initiated an expiry review investigation of the countervailing measures by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [14] on 5 December 2015.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/2018 [12] umaknila svoje sprejetje zaveze za dva proizvajalca izvoznika.
The Commission also initiated a partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [15] on 5 December 2015.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenim 5. decembra 2015 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [13], začela preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka protidampinških ukrepov.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/115 [16] the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another exporting producer.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenim 5. decembra 2015 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [14], začela preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka izravnalnih ukrepov.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185 [17], the Commission extended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 on imports of the products concerned originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China to imports of the product concerned consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenim 5. decembra 2015 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [15], začela tudi delni vmesni pregled protidampinških in izravnalnih ukrepov.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 [18], the Commission extended the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 on imports of the products concerned originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China to imports of the product concerned consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/115 [16] umaknila svoje sprejetje zaveze za še enega od proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1045 [19] the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another exporting producer.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/185 [17] dokončno protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1238/2013 na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, razširila na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov, poslanih iz Malezije in Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana ali ne.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1382 [20] the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another five exporting producers.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/184 [18] dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1239/2013 na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, razširila na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov, poslanih iz Malezije in Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana ali ne.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1402 [21] the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another three exporting producers.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/1045 [19] umaknila svoje sprejetje zaveze za še enega od proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1998 [22] the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another five exporting producers.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/1382 [20] umaknila svoje sprejetje zaveze za še pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
B. TERMS OF THE UNDERTAKING
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/1402 [21] umaknila svoje sprejetje zaveze za še tri proizvajalce izvoznike.
The exporting producers agreed, inter alia, not to sell the product covered to the first independent customer in the Union below a certain minimum import price (‘the MIP’) within the associated annual level of imports to the Union (‘annual level’) laid down in the undertaking.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/1998 [22] umaknila svoje sprejetje zaveze za še pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The exporting producers also agreed to sell the product covered only by means of direct sales.
B. POGOJI ZAVEZE
For the purpose of the undertaking, a direct sale is defined as a sale either to the first independent customer in the Union or via a related party in the Union listed in the undertaking.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so se med drugim strinjali, da zajetega izdelka ne bodo prodajali prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji pod določeno minimalno uvozno ceno v okviru povezane letne ravni uvoza v Unijo („letna raven“), določene v zavezi.
The undertaking sets out, in a non-exhaustive list, the breaches of the undertaking.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so tudi soglašali s prodajo zajetega izdelka le prek neposredne prodaje.
The list of breaches includes indirect sales to the Union by companies other than those listed in the undertaking.
Za namene zaveze je neposredna prodaja opredeljena kot prodaja bodisi prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji ali prek povezanih strank v Uniji, ki so navedene v zavezi.
The undertaking also obliges the exporting producers to provide the Commission on a quarterly basis with detailed information on all their export sales to and re-sales in the Union (‘the quarterly reports’).
V zavezi so prav tako v okviru neizčrpnega seznama navedene kršitve zaveze.
This implies that the data submitted in these quarterly reports must be complete and correct and the reported transactions fully comply with the terms of the undertaking.
Seznam kršitev vključuje posredno prodajo v Unijo s strani družb, ki niso navedene v zavezi.
Reporting of re-sales in the Union is a particular obligation when the product covered is sold to the first independent customer through a related importer.
Z zavezo se proizvajalci izvozniki tudi obvezujejo, da bodo Komisiji za vsako četrtletje predložili podrobne informacije o celotnem izvozu in nadaljnji prodaji v Unijo („četrtletna poročila“).
Only these reports enable the Commission to monitor whether the re-sale price of the related importer to the first independent customer is in accordance the MIP.
To pomeni, da morajo biti podatki v teh četrtletnih poročilih popolni in pravilni ter da so sporočene transakcije popolnoma v skladu s pogoji zaveze.
The exporting producer is liable for the breach of any of its related parties, whether or not listed in the undertaking.
Poročanje o nadaljnji prodaji v Uniji je posebna obveznost, ko se zajeti izdelek proda prvi neodvisni stranki prek povezanega uvoznika.
C. MONITORING OF THE EXPORTING PRODUCERS AND VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL
Samo ta poročila omogočijo Komisiji, da spremlja, ali je cena nadaljnje prodaje prvi neodvisni stranki s strani povezanega uvoznika v skladu z minimalno uvozno ceno.
While monitoring compliance with the undertaking, the Commission verified information submitted by Huashun China and Seraphim China that was relevant to the undertaking.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je odgovoren za kršitve katere koli od svojih povezanih strank, ne glede na to, ali so navedene v zavezi ali ne.
The Commission also assessed publicly available information regarding the corporate structure of the two companies.
C. SPREMLJANJE PROIZVAJALCEV IZVOZNIKOV IN PROSTOVOLJNI UMIK
The findings set out in recitals 27 to 30 address the problems identified for Huashun China and Seraphim China which oblige the Commission to withdraw the acceptance of the undertaking for these exporting producers.
Komisija je hkrati s spremljanjem skladnosti z zavezo preverila informacije, ki sta jih predložili družbi Huashun China in Seraphim China in ki so bile relevantne za zavezo.
D. GROUNDS TO WITHDRAW THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING
Komisija je ocenila tudi javno dostopne informacije glede korporacijske strukture obeh družb.
Sales by Huashun China
Ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 27 do 30 obravnavajo težave, ugotovljene pri družbah Huashun China in Seraphim China, zaradi katerih je Komisija dolžna umakniti sprejetje zaveze za zadevna proizvajalca izvoznika.
In its quarterly reports, Huashun China had reported numerous sales transaction of the product covered to an allegedly unrelated importer in the Union and had issued undertaking invoices.
D. RAZLOGI ZA UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZE
Based on the information available to the Commission, the importer involved in these transactions was however related to Huashun China.
Prodaja s strani družbe Huashun China
As this importer is not listed as related party in the undertaking, Huashun China breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 20 to 22.
Družba Huashun China je v svojih četrtletnih poročilih poročala o številnih prodajnih transakcijah zajetega izdelka domnevno nepovezanemu uvozniku v Uniji in je izdala račune na podlagi zaveze.
None of the re-sales by the related importer was reported to the Commission.
Toda na podlagi informacij, ki so na voljo Komisiji, je bil uvoznik, vključen v te transakcije, povezan z družbo Huashun China.
Consequently, Huashun China also breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recital 23 and 24.
Ker ta uvoznik v zavezi ni naveden kot povezana stranka, je družba Huashun China kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 20 do 22.
Sales by Seraphim China
Komisija ni bila obveščena o nobeni nadaljnji prodaji s strani povezanega uvoznika.
In its quarterly reports, Seraphim China had reported numerous sales transactions of the product covered to an allegedly unrelated importer in the Union and had issued undertaking invoices.
Zato je družba Huashun China kršila tudi pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 23 in 24.
Based on the information available to the Commission, the importer involved in the above transactions was related to Seraphim China.
Prodaja s strani družbe Seraphim China
As this importer is not listed as related party in the undertaking, Seraphim China breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 20 to 22.
Družba Seraphim China je v svojih četrtletnih poročilih poročala o številnih prodajnih transakcijah zajetega izdelka domnevno nepovezanemu uvozniku v Uniji in je izdala račune na podlagi zaveze.
Consequently, Seraphim China also breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recital 23 and 24.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so na voljo Komisiji, je bil uvoznik, vključen v navedene transakcije, povezan z družbo Seraphim China.
E. INVALIDATION OF UNDERTAKING INVOICES
Ker ta uvoznik v zavezi ni naveden kot povezana stranka, je družba Seraphim China kršila pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 20 do 22.
The indirect sales transactions made by Huashun China and Seraphim China are linked to the following undertaking invoices:
Zato je družba Seraphim China kršila tudi pogoje zaveze, kot so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 23 in 24.
Number of Commercial invoice accompanying goods subject to an undertaking
E. RAZVELJAVITEV RAČUNOV NA PODLAGI ZAVEZE
Date
Posredne prodajne transakcije, ki sta jih izvršili družbi Huashun China in Seraphim China, so povezane z naslednjimi računi na podlagi zaveze:
Issued by
Številka trgovinskega računa, priloženega blagu, za katero velja zaveza
Issued to
Datum
Therefore, in accordance with Article 3(2)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and Article 2(2)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, these invoices are declared invalid.
Izdala družba
The customs debt incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation should be recovered by the national customs authorities under Article 105(3)-(6) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [23] when the withdrawal of the undertaking in relation to the two exporting producers enters into force.
Izdano družbi
The national customs authorities responsible for the collection of duties will be informed accordingly.
Zato se v skladu s členom 3(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(2)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 ti računi razglasijo za neveljavne.
In this context, the Commission recalls that pursuant to Article 3(1)(b) read in conjunction with Annex III, Nr. 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and to Article 2(1)(b) read in conjunction with Annex 2, Nr. 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, imports are only exempted from duties if the invoice indicates the price and possible rebates.
Carinski dolg, ki je nastal ob sprejetju deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet, bi morali nacionalni carinski organi v skladu s členom 105(3) do (6) Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [23] izterjati ob začetku veljavnosti umika zaveze za zadevna proizvajalca izvoznika.
Where those conditions are not complied with, duties are due, even where the commercial invoice accompanying the goods has not been invalidated by the Commission.
Nacionalni carinski organi, ki so pristojni za pobiranje dajatev, bodo o tem ustrezno obveščeni.
F. ASSESSMENT OF PRACTICABILITY OF THE OVERALL UNDERTAKING
V tem okviru Komisija poudarja, da je v skladu s členom 3(1)(b) v povezavi s točko 7 Priloge III Izvedbene Uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(1)(b) v povezavi s točko 7 Priloge 2 Izvedbene Uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 uvoz oproščen dajatev le, če so na računu navedeni cena in morebitni rabati.
The undertaking stipulates that a breach by an individual exporting producer does not automatically lead to the withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers.
Če ta pogoj ni izpolnjen, je treba dajatve plačati, tudi če Komisija ni razveljavila trgovinskega računa, priloženega blagu.
In such a case, the Commission shall assess the impact of that particular breach on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
F. OCENA IZVEDLJIVOSTI CELOTNE ZAVEZE
The Commission has accordingly assessed the impact of the breaches by Huashun China and Seraphim China on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
Zaveza določa, da kršitev s strani posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika ne privede samodejno do umika sprejetja zaveze za vse proizvajalce izvoznike.
The responsibility for the breaches lies alone with the exporting producers in question; the monitoring has not revealed any systematic breaches by a major number of exporting producers or the CCCME.
V takem primeru Komisija oceni učinek te kršitve na izvedljivost zaveze z učinkom za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
The Commission therefore concludes that the overall functioning of the undertaking is not affected and that there are no grounds for withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
Komisija je ustrezno ocenila vpliv kršitev s strani družb Huashun China in Seraphim China na izvedljivost zaveze z učinkom za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
G. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS
Odgovornost za kršitve se pripiše samo zadevnima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma.
Interested parties were granted the opportunity to be heard and to comment pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
S spremljanjem niso bile razkrite nobene sistematične kršitve s strani velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali CCCME.
Both exporting producers submitted comments after the disclosure.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da delovanje v skladu z zavezo na splošno ni ogroženo in da ni razlogov za umik sprejetja zaveze za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
One exporting producer contested the relationship alleging that the importer in the Union was owned by another person than the exporting producer.
G. PISNA STALIŠČA IN ZASLIŠANJA
The Commission sent additional evidence confirming the relationship between that exporting producer and the importer in the Union.
Zainteresirane strani so imele priložnost, da izrazijo svoja stališča in predložijo pripombe v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
The exporting producer did not further react.
Oba proizvajalca izvoznika sta po razkritju predložila pripombe.
Therefore, the claim is rejected.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je izpodbijal ta odnos in trdil, da je uvoznik v Uniji bil v lasti druge osebe, ne proizvajalca izvoznika.
The other exporting producer made a general statement contesting the Commission's evidence of the relationship, without further substantiating it.
Komisija je poslala dodatne dokaze, ki potrjujejo odnos med proizvajalcem izvoznikom in uvoznikom v Uniji.
The Commission notes that the exporting producer has not contested the relationship itself.
Proizvajalec izvoznik ni predložil nadaljnjih pripomb.
The Commission also notes that the relationship has been declared by the exporting producer in the sampling replies in the ongoing expiry review of the measures in force.
Trditev se zato zavrne.
Furthermore, one exporting producer requested a hearing but did not follow up on the request.
Drugi proizvajalec izvoznik je podal splošno izjavo, v kateri je izpodbijal dokaze Komisije o odnosu, vendar tega ni dodatno utemeljil.
The same exporting producer contested the invalidation of invoices.
Komisija ugotavlja, da proizvajalec izvoznik ni izpodbijal samega odnosa.
It claimed that the Commission cannot impose duties/order customs to levy duties on imports released for free circulation before the date of the withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking if imports have not been registered.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da je proizvajalec izvoznik prijavil odnos v izpolnjenem vprašalniku za izbor vzorca v okviru sedanjega pregleda zaradi izteka veljavnih ukrepov.
The claim is based on an understanding that the Commission may decide to impose provisional duties before the withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec izvoznik zahteval zaslišanje, vendar ni ukrepal v skladu s to zahtevo.
According to Article 8(10) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(10) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, a provisional duty may be imposed in case where the investigation that led to the undertaking has not been completed.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je nasprotoval razveljavitvi računov.
This is not the case in the case at hand where the investigations have been completed with the imposition of definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties.
Trdil je, da Komisija ne more uvesti dajatev oziroma carini naložiti obračunavanje dajatev na uvoz, sproščen v prosti promet pred datumom umika sprejetja zaveze, če uvoz ni bil registriran.
Consequently, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, in case of breach or withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking by the Commission, the definitive duties shall automatically apply.
Trditev temelji na razumevanju, da se Komisija lahko odloči za uvedbo začasnih dajatev pred umikom sprejetja zaveze.
The claim is therefore rejected.
V skladu s členom 8(10) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(10) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe se lahko začasna dajatev uvede v primeru, ko preiskava, ki je pripeljala do zaveze, še ni zaključena.
This exporting producer also claimed that the Commission has itself recognised that there is no legal basis for retroactive withdrawal [24].
To pa ne velja v sedanji zadevi, pri kateri so se preiskave zaključile z uvedbo dokončnih protidampinških in izravnalnih dajatev.
The Commission notes that the withdrawal in the present case is not retroactive.
Posledično se v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe v primeru kršitve ali umika sprejetja zaveze s strani Komisije samodejno uporabijo dokončne dajatve.
It is a withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking combined with invalidation of undertaking invoices.
Trditev se zato zavrne.
The Commission's response on retroactive withdrawal was also specific to the circumstances of the particular withdrawal and particular claim made by one of the parties in that case.
Poleg tega je ta proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je Komisija sama priznala, da ni pravne podlage za retroaktivni umik [24].
H. WITHDRAWAL OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING AND IMPOSITIONS OF DEFINITIVE DUTIES
Komisija opozarja, da umik v obravnavanem primeru ni retroaktiven.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and also in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking for Huashun China and Seraphim China should be withdrawn.
Gre za umik sprejetja zaveze skupaj z razveljavitvijo računov na podlagi zaveze.
Accordingly, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 automatically apply to imports originating in or consigned from the PRC of the product concerned and produced by Ningbo Huashun Solar Energy Technology Co.
Odgovor Komisije v zvezi z retroaktivnim umikom se je nanašal tudi na posebne okoliščine zadevnega umika in posebno trditev, ki jo je predložila ena od strank v navedeni zadevi.
Ltd, covered by the TARIC additional code: B856 and, Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System Co.
H. UMIK ZAVEZE IN DOLOČITEV DOKONČNIH DAJATEV
Ltd covered by the TARIC additional code: B836 as of the day of entry into force of this Regulation.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe ter tudi v skladu s pogoji zaveze sklenila, da bi bilo treba sprejetje zaveze za družbi Huashun China in Seraphim China umakniti.
Where the customs authorities of the Member States have indications that the price presented on an undertaking invoice does not correspond to the price actually paid, they should investigate whether the requirement to include any rebates in the undertaking invoices has been violated or the MIP has not been respected.
V skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe se dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1238/2013, in dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1239/2013, začneta samodejno uporabljati za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK ali ki je od tam poslan in ga proizvajajo družbe Ningbo Huashun Solar Energy Technology Co.
Where customs authorities of the Member States conclude that there has been such a violation or whether the MIP has not been respected, they should collect the duties as a consequence thereof.
Ltd, ki je zajeta z dodatno oznako TARIC: B856, ter Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System Co.
In order to facilitate, on the basis of Article 4(3) of the Treaty, the work of the customs authorities of the Member States, the Commission should share in such situations the confidential text and other information of the undertaking for the sole purpose of national proceedings.
Ltd, ki je zajeta z dodatno oznako TARIC: B836, z dnem začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
For information purposes the table in Annex II to this Regulation lists the exporting producers for whom the acceptance of the undertaking by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU is not affected,
Kadar po podatkih carinskih organov držav članic kaže, da cena na računu na podlagi zaveze ne ustreza dejansko plačani ceni, bi carinski organi morali preiskati, ali se je kršila zahteva, da se vsi rabati vključijo v račune na podlagi zaveze, ali se ni spoštovala minimalna uvozna cena.