natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
if the opposition is based on a mark with a reputation within the meaning of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, in addition to the evidence referred to in point (a) of this paragraph, evidence showing that the mark has a reputation in the Union or in the Member State concerned for the goods or services indicated in accordance with Article 2(2)(g) of this Regulation, as well as evidence or arguments showing that use without due cause of the trade mark applied for would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.
Vsako potrdilo o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju oziroma enakovreden dokument iz odstavka 2(a)(d) ali (e), kakor tudi katere koli določbe veljavnega nacionalnega prava, ki ureja pridobivanje pravic in obseg njihovega varstva, kot je navedeno v odstavkih 2(d) in (e), vključno z dokazili, dostopnimi na spletu, kot je navedeno v odstavku 3, so v jeziku postopka ali se predložijo skupaj s prevodom v ta jezik.
Where the evidence concerning the filing or registration of the earlier rights referred to in paragraph 2(a) or, where applicable, paragraph 2(d) or (e), or the evidence concerning the contents of the relevant national law, is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, the opposing party may provide such evidence by making reference to that source.
Stranka, ki ugovarja, prevod na lastno pobudo predloži v roku, določenem za predložitev izvirnika.
Any filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents referred to in paragraph 2(a), (d) or (e), as well as any provisions of the applicable national law governing the acquisition of rights and their scope of protection as referred to in paragraph 2(d) and (e), including evidence accessible online as referred to in paragraph 3, shall be in the language of the proceedings or shall be accompanied by a translation into that language.
Urad ne upošteva pisnih vlog ali njihovih delov, ki niso bili predloženi v jeziku postopka ali ki vanj niso bili prevedeni v roku, ki ga je v skladu z odstavkom 1 določil Urad.
Translations submitted after the expiry of the relevant time limits shall not be taken into account.
Če stranka, ki ugovarja, do izteka roka iz člena 7(1) ni predložila nobenega dokazila oziroma če so predložena dokazila očitno neustrezna ali ne zadoščajo zahtevam iz člena 7(2) za katero koli prejšnjo pravico, se ugovor zavrže kot neutemeljen.
The Office shall not take into account written submissions, or parts thereof, that have not been submitted in or not been translated into the language of the proceedings within the time limit set by the Office in accordance with paragraph 1.
Če ugovor na podlagi odstavka 1 ni zavržen, Urad prijavitelja obvesti o vložitvi ugovora in ga pozove, naj vloži svoje pripombe v roku, ki mu ga določi.
Article 8
Če prijavitelj ne vloži nobenih pripomb, Urad izda odločbo o ugovoru na podlagi razpoložljivih dokazov.
Examination of the opposition
O pripombah, ki jih vloži prijavitelj, se obvesti stranka, ki ugovarja in ki jo Urad, če se mu tako zdi potrebno, pozove k odgovoru v roku, ki ji ga določi.
Where, until the expiry of the period referred to in Article 7(1), the opposing party has not provided any evidence, or where the evidence provided is manifestly irrelevant or manifestly insufficient to meet the requirements laid down in Article 7(2) for any of the earlier rights, the opposition shall be rejected as unfounded.
Če po izteku roka iz člena 7(1) stranka, ki ugovarja, predloži dejstva ali dokazila, ki dopolnjujejo zadevna dejstva ali dokazila, predložena znotraj tega roka, in se nanašajo na isto zahtevo iz člena 7(2), Urad v skladu s členom 76(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 pri odločanju, ali naj sprejme ta dopolnilna dejstva in dokazila, uveljavlja svojo diskrecijo.
Where the opposition is not rejected pursuant to paragraph 1, the Office shall communicate the submission of the opposing party to the applicant and shall invite it to file its observations within a period specified by the Office.
V ta namen Urad upošteva predvsem, v kateri fazi je postopek, ali je verjetno, da bodo dejstva ali dokazila prima facie pomembna za izid zadeve, in ali obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za zamudo pri predložitvi dejstev ali dokazil.
Where the applicant submits no observations, the Office shall base its ruling on the opposition on the evidence before it.
Če se mu to v danih okoliščinah zdi ustrezno, Urad pozove prijavitelja, naj v odgovor predloži nadaljnje pripombe.
The observations submitted by the applicant shall be communicated to the opposing party who shall be invited, if the Office considers it necessary, to reply within a period specified by the Office.
Če se ugovor v skladu z odstavkom 1 ne zavrže in dokazila, ki jih predloži stranka, ki ugovarja, v skladu s členom 7 niso zadostna za utemeljitev nasprotovanja za katero koli izmed prejšnjih pravic, se ugovor zavrže kot neutemeljen.
Where, after the expiry of the period referred to in Article 7(1), the opposing party submits facts or evidence that supplement relevant facts or evidence provided within that period and that relate to the same requirement laid down in Article 7(2), the Office shall exercise its discretion under Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in deciding whether to accept these supplementing facts or evidence.
Člen 6(2) in (3) se po datumu, ki se šteje za začetek kontradiktornega dela postopka z ugovorom, smiselno uporablja.
For that purpose, the Office shall take into account, in particular, the stage of proceedings and whether the facts or evidence are, prima facie, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case and whether there are valid reasons for the late submission of the facts or evidence.
Če prijavitelj želi umakniti ali omejiti izpodbijano prijavo, to stori z ločeno vlogo.
The Office shall invite the applicant to submit further observations in response if it deems it appropriate under the circumstances.
V ustreznih primerih lahko Urad pozove stranke, naj omejijo svoje pripombe na posamezna vprašanja, vendar strankam dovoli, da postavijo druga vprašanja v poznejši fazi postopka.
Where the opposition has not been rejected pursuant to paragraph 1 and the evidence submitted by the opposing party is not sufficient to substantiate the opposition in accordance with Article 7 for any of the earlier rights, the opposition shall be rejected as unfounded.
Od Urada se ne zahteva, da stranko obvesti o možnosti predložitve določenih relevantnih dejstev ali dokazil, ki jih ta stranka prej ni predložila.
Article 6(2) and (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis after the date on which the adversarial part of the opposition proceedings is deemed to commence.
Člen 9
Where the applicant wishes to withdraw or restrict the contested application, it shall do so by way of a separate document.
Več ugovorov
In appropriate cases, the Office may invite the parties to limit their observations to particular issues, in which case it shall allow them to raise the other issues at a later stage of the proceedings.
Če se je v zvezi z isto prijavo za registracijo blagovne znamke EU vložilo večje število ugovorov, jih Urad lahko preveri v enem samem postopku.
The Office shall not be required to inform a party of the possibility to produce certain relevant facts or evidence which that party previously failed to produce.
Urad se lahko kasneje odloči, da te ugovore preveri ločeno.
Article 9
Če se s predhodnim preverjanjem enega ali več ugovorov odkrije, da je blagovna znamka EU, za katero se je vložila prijava za registracijo, v zvezi z nekaterim ali vsem blagom oziroma storitvami, ki jih prijava zadeva, lahko neupravičena do registracije, Urad lahko prekine druge postopke z ugovorom, povezane s to prijavo.
Multiple oppositions
Urad obvesti stranke, ki ugovarjajo in na katere je prekinitev vplivala, o vseh pomembnih odločitvah, sprejetih v okviru teh postopkov, ki so v teku.
Where a number of oppositions have been entered in respect of the same application for the registration of an EU trade mark, the Office may examine them in one set of proceedings.
Ko odločba o zavrnitvi prijave iz odstavka 1 postane dokončna, se ugovori, za katere so bili v skladu z odstavkom 2 postopki prekinjeni, štejejo za rešene, stranke, ki ugovarjajo, pa se o tem obvesti.
The Office may subsequently decide to examine those oppositions separately.
V smislu člena 85(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 se s tovrstnim končanjem razume, da se postopek ni nadaljeval na sodišču.
Where a preliminary examination of one or more oppositions reveals that the EU trade mark for which an application for registration has been filed may be ineligible for registration in respect of some or all of the goods or services for which registration is sought, the Office may suspend the other opposition proceedings relating to that application.
Urad povrne 50 % pristojbine za ugovor vsaki stranki, ki ugovarja, če se njen ugovor v skladu z odstavkom 3 šteje za rešenega, pod pogojem, da se je postopek v zvezi s tem ugovorom prekinil pred pričetkom kontradiktornega dela postopka.
The Office shall inform the opposing parties affected by the suspension of any relevant decisions taken in the context of those proceedings which are ongoing.
Člen 10
Once a decision rejecting an application as referred to in paragraph 1 has become final, the oppositions for which proceedings have been suspended in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be deemed to have been disposed of and the opposing parties concerned shall be informed accordingly.
Dokaz o uporabi
Such a disposition shall be considered to constitute a case which has not proceeded to judgment within the meaning of Article 85(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Zahteva za dokaz o uporabi prejšnje blagovne znamke je v skladu s členom 42(2) ali (3) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 dopustna, če je predložena kot brezpogojna zahteva v ločeni vlogi v roku, ki ga v skladu s členom 8(2) te uredbe določi Urad.
The Office shall refund 50 % of the opposition fee paid by each opposing party whose opposition is deemed to have been disposed of in accordance with paragraph 3, provided that the suspension of the proceedings relating to that opposition took place before the commencement of the adversarial part of the proceedings.
Če je prijavitelj v skladu s členom 42(2) ali (3) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 zahteval dokaz o uporabi prejšnje znamke, Urad pozove stranko, ki ugovarja, naj predloži zadevne dokaze, in določi rok, v katerem naj to stori.
Article 10
Če stranka, ki ugovarja, pred iztekom roka ne predloži nobenih dokazil ali razlogov za neuporabo oziroma so predložena dokazila oziroma razlogi očitno nezadostni ali neustrezni, Urad zavrže ugovor v delu, ki zadeva to prejšnjo znamko.
Proof of use
Na podlagi podatkov in dokazil o uporabi se ugotovi kraj, čas, obseg in narava uporabe blagovne znamke, na kateri temelji ugovor, za blago in storitve, za katere je registrirana.
A request for proof of use of an earlier mark pursuant to Article 42(2) or (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall be admissible if it is submitted as an unconditional request in a separate document within the period specified by the Office pursuant to Article 8(2) of this Regulation.
Dokazila iz odstavka 3 se vložijo v skladu s členom 55(2) ter členoma 63 in 64 ter so omejena na dodatno dokumentacijo in predmete, kot so embalaže, nalepke, ceniki, katalogi, računi, fotografije, časopisni oglasi in pisne izjave iz člena 78(1)(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009.
Where the applicant has made a request for proof of use of an earlier mark which complies with the requirements of Article 42(2) or (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the Office shall invite the opposing party to provide the proof required within a time limit specified by the Office.
Zahteva za dokaz o uporabi se lahko vloži skupaj s pripombami o razlogih, na katerih temelji ugovor.
Where the opposing party does not provide any evidence or reasons for non-use before the time limit expires or where the evidence or reasons provided are manifestly insufficient or irrelevant, the Office shall reject the opposition in so far as it is based on that earlier mark.
Te pripombe se lahko vložijo skupaj s pripombami v odgovor na dokaz o uporabi.
The indications and evidence of use shall establish the place, time, extent and nature of use of the opposing trade mark for the goods or services in respect of which it is registered and on which the opposition is based.
Če dokazila stranke, ki ugovarja, niso v jeziku postopka z ugovorom, lahko Urad od stranke, ki ugovarja, zahteva, naj v skladu s členom 24 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431 predloži prevod teh dokazil v jezik postopka.
The evidence referred to in paragraph 3 shall be filed in accordance with Article 55(2) and Articles 63 and 64 and shall be limited to the submission of supporting documents and items such as packages, labels, price lists, catalogues, invoices, photographs, newspaper advertisements, and statements in writing as referred to in Article 78(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Če po izteku roka iz odstavka 2 stranka, ki ugovarja, predloži podatke ali dokazila, ki dopolnjujejo zadevne podatke ali dokazila, predložene znotraj tega roka, in se nanašajo na isto zahtevo iz odstavka 3, Urad v skladu s členom 76(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 pri odločanju, ali naj sprejme navedene dopolnilne podatke in dokazila, uveljavlja svojo diskrecijo.
A request for proof of use may be filed at the same time as observations on the grounds on which the opposition is based.
V ta namen Urad upošteva predvsem, v kateri fazi je postopek, ali je verjetno, da bodo dejstva ali dokazila prima facie pomembna za izid zadeve in ali obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za zamudo pri predložitvi dokazil.
Such observations may also be filed together with the observations in reply to the proof of use.
NASLOV III
Where the evidence supplied by the opposing party is not in the language of the opposition proceedings, the Office may require the opposing party to submit a translation of that evidence in that language pursuant to Article 24 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431.
SPREMEMBA PRIJAVE
Where after the expiry of the time limit referred to in paragraph 2, the opposing party submits indications or evidence that supplement relevant indications or evidence already submitted before expiry of that time limit and relate to the same requirement laid down in paragraph 3, the Office shall exercise its discretion under Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in deciding whether to accept those supplementing indications or evidence.
Člen 11
For that purpose, the Office shall take into account, in particular, the stage of proceedings and whether the indications or evidence are, prima facie, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case and whether there are valid reasons for the late submission of the indications or evidence.
Sprememba prijave
TITLE III
Zahteva za spremembo prijave v skladu s členom 43(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 vsebuje:
AMENDMENT OF THE APPLICATION
številko spisa prijave;
Article 11
ime in naslov prijavitelja v skladu s členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431;
Amendment of the application
navedbo elementa prijave, ki naj se spremeni, in ta element v spremenjeni verziji;
A request for amendment of an application pursuant to Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall contain:
če je sprememba povezana s prikazom znamke, prikaz znamke v spremenjeni obliki v skladu s členom 3 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431.
the file number of the application;
Če pogoji za spremembo prijave niso izpolnjeni, Urad prijavitelju sporoči pomanjkljivosti in določi rok, v katerem naj jih odpravi.
the name and address of the applicant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431;
Če prijavitelj pomanjkljivosti ne odpravi v določenem roku, Urad zahtevo za spremembo zavrže.
an indication of the element of the application to be amended, and that element in its amended version;
Če je spremenjena prijava v skladu s členom 43(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 objavljena, se členi 2 do 10 te Uredbe smiselno uporabljajo.
where the amendment relates to the representation of the mark, a representation of the mark as amended, in accordance with Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431.
Za spremembo istega elementa pri dveh ali več prijavah istega prijavitelja se lahko vloži le ena zahteva za spremembo.
Where the requirements for the amendment of the application are not fulfilled, the Office shall communicate the deficiency to the applicant and shall specify a time limit for remedying the deficiency.
Odstavki 1, 2 in 4 se smiselno uporabljajo pri prijavah, kjer se popravi ime ali službeni naslov zastopnika, ki ga imenuje prijavitelj.
Where the applicant does not remedy the deficiency within the specified time limit, the Office shall reject the request for amendment.
NASLOV IV
Where the amended trade mark application is published pursuant to Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, Articles 2 to 10 of this Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis.
RAZVELJAVITEV IN NIČNOST ALI PRENOS
A single request for amendment may be made for the amendment of the same element in two or more applications by the same applicant.
Člen 12
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 shall apply mutatis mutandis for applications to correct the name or the business address of a representative appointed by the applicant.
Zahteva za razveljavitev ali zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti
TITLE IV
Zahteva za razveljavitev ali razglasitev ničnosti, ki se naslovi na Urad, v skladu s členom 56 Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 vsebuje:
REVOCATION AND INVALIDITY OR ASSIGNMENT
registracijsko številko blagovne znamke EU, za katero se je vložila zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti, in ime njenega imetnika;
Article 12
razloge, na katerih temelji vloga, in sicer v obliki izjave, da so izpolnjeni pogoji, določeni v členih 51, 52, 53, 73, 74 in 74i ali 74j Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009;
Application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity
v zvezi z vložnikom zahteve:
An application to the Office for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity pursuant to Article 56 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall contain:
navedbo vložnika v skladu s členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431;
the registration number of the EU trade mark in respect of which revocation or a declaration of invalidity is sought and the name of its proprietor;
če je vložnik imenoval zastopnika oziroma če je zastopništvo v smislu člena 92(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 obvezno, ime in službeni naslov zastopnika v skladu s členom 2(1)(e) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1431;
the grounds on which the application is based by means of a statement that the respective requirements laid down in Articles 51, 52, 53, 73, 74, 74i or 74j of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 are fulfilled;
navedbo blaga ali storitev, za katere se je vložila zahteva za razveljavitev ali razglasitev ničnosti, brez katere se šteje, da je prijava naperjena zoper vse blago ali storitve, ki jih izpodbijana blagovna znamka EU zajema.
as concerns the applicant:
Zahteva za razglasitev ničnosti, ki temelji na relativnih razlogih, poleg pogojev iz odstavka 1 vsebuje še:
the identification of the applicant in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431;
v primeru zahteve na podlagi člena 53(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 navedbo prejšnje pravice, na kateri zahteva temelji, v skladu s členom 2(2)(b) te uredbe, ki se za tovrstno zahtevo smiselno uporablja;
where the applicant has appointed a representative or where representation is mandatory within the meaning of Article 92(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the name and business address of the representative, in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1431;
v primeru zahteve na podlagi člena 53(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 navedbo narave prejšnje pravice, na kateri zahteva temelji, njen prikaz ter navedbo, ali ta prejšnja pravica obstaja v celotni Uniji ali v eni ali več državah članicah, in če je tako, navedbo teh držav članic;
an indication of the goods or services in respect of which revocation or a declaration of invalidity is sought, in the absence of which the application shall be deemed to be directed against all the goods or services covered by the contested EU trade mark.
podrobnosti na podlagi člena 2(2)(d) do (g), ki se za tovrstno prijavo smiselno uporablja;
In addition to the requirements laid down in paragraph 1, an application for a declaration of invalidity based on relative grounds shall contain the following:
če je zahtevo vložil pridobitelj licence ali oseba, ki je v skladu z zadevno zakonodajo Unije ali nacionalnim pravom upravičena uveljavljati prejšnjo pravico, navedbo o pooblastilu ali upravičenosti do vložitve zahteve.
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, an identification of the earlier right on which the application is based, in accordance with Article 2(2)(b) of this Regulation, which shall apply mutatis mutandis to such an application;
Če zahteva za razglasitev ničnosti na podlagi člena 53 Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 temelji na več kot eni prejšnji znamki ali prejšnji pravici, se za vsako od teh znamk ali pravic uporabljata odstavka 1(b) in 2 tega člena.
in the case of an application pursuant to Article 53(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, an indication of the nature of the earlier right on which the application is based, its representation and an indication of whether this earlier right exists in the whole of the Union or in one or more Member States, and if so, an indication of those Member States;
Zahteva lahko vsebuje utemeljeno izjavo z vzroki, kjer so izpostavljena dejstva in navedbe, na katerih temelji, ter dodatna dokazila.
particulars pursuant to Article 2(2)(d) to (g), which apply mutatis mutandis to such an application;
Člen 13
where the application is entered by a licensee or by a person who is entitled under the relevant Union legislation or national law to exercise an earlier right, an indication concerning the authorisation or entitlement to file the application.
Jeziki, ki se uporabljajo v postopku za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti
Where the application for a declaration of invalidity pursuant to Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 is based on more than one earlier mark or earlier right, paragraphs 1(b) and 2 of this Article shall apply for each of those marks or rights.
Vložnik zahteve za razveljavitev ali razglasitev ničnosti ali imetnik blagovne znamke EU lahko pred iztekom roka dveh mesecev po imetnikovem prejemu sporočila iz člena 17(1) obvesti Urad, da je bil v skladu s členom 119(7) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 dosežen dogovor o drugem jeziku postopka.
The application may contain a reasoned statement on the grounds setting out the facts and arguments on which it is based and supporting evidence.
Če vloga ni bila vložena v navedenem jeziku, lahko imetnik zahteva, da stranka, ki ugovarja, vloži prevod v navedeni jezik.
Article 13
Urad tako zahtevo prejme najkasneje dva meseca po datumu, na katerega je imetnik blagovne znamke EU prejel sporočilo iz člena 17(1).
Languages used in revocation or invalidity proceedings
Urad vložniku določi rok za vložitev tega prevoda.
The applicant for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity or the proprietor of the EU trade mark may inform the Office before the expiry of a period of two months from receipt by the EU trade mark proprietor of the communication referred to in Article 17(1), that a different language of proceedings has been agreed pursuant to Article 119(7) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Kadar ta prevod ni vložen ali je vložen prepozno, ostane jezik postopka nespremenjen.
Where the application has not been filed in that language, the proprietor may request that the applicant file a translation in that language.
Člen 14
Such a request shall be received by the Office before the expiry of the period of two months from receipt by the EU trade mark proprietor of the communication referred to in Article 17(1).
Informacije za stranke v zvezi z zahtevo za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti