natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The reply emphasises that the appointment of the new President of the Tribunal on 21 December 2016 as well as the entry into force of provisions of the law on Organisation and Proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal, the law on the Status of Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal and the law Implementing the law on Organisation and Proceedings and the law on the Status of Judges have created the proper conditions for the functioning of the Tribunal after a period of paralysis caused by political quarrels of politicians of the opposition in which the former President of the Tribunal was also engaged.
Predsednik Beneške komisije je 16. januarja 2017 izdal izjavo, v kateri je izrazil pomisleke glede poslabšanja razmer na ustavnem sodišču.
On 21 December 2016, Mr Mariusz Muszyński, who was nominated by the 8th term of the Sejm without a valid legal basis and was admitted to take up the function of judge in the Constitutional Tribunal on 20 December 2016 by the then acting President of the Tribunal, was appointed to substitute the new President of the Tribunal in case of her absence.
Dne 20. januarja 2017 je vlada napovedala celovito reformo sodstva.
On 10 January 2017, the Vice-President of the Constitutional Tribunal was obliged by the newly appointed President of the Tribunal to use his remaining leave.
Minister za pravosodje je predstavil osnutek zakona o nacionalnem sodnem svetu.
On 12 January 2017, the Minister of Justice launched a procedure before the Constitutional Tribunal to review the constitutionality of the election, in 2010, of three judges of the Tribunal.
Dne 10. februarja 2017 je pritožbeno sodišče v Varšavi vrhovnemu sodišču predložilo pravno vprašanje v zvezi s presojo zakonitosti imenovanja sodnice Julie Przyłębske na položaj predsednice ustavnega sodišča.
Following this procedure, cases have no longer been assigned to these three judges.
Vrhovno sodišče še ni izdalo sodbe.
On 16 January 2017, the President of the Venice Commission issued a statement expressing his concerns about the worsening situation within the Tribunal.
Dne 24. februarja 2017 je Sejm imenoval novega sodnika za nadomestitev sodnika, ki je odstopil s položaja na ustavnem sodišču in postal sodnik na poljskem vrhovnem sodišču.
On 20 January 2017, the Government announced a comprehensive reform of the judiciary.
Dne 1. marca 2017 je skupina 50 poslancev Sejma ustavno sodišče pozvala, naj ugotovi neustavnost določb zakona o vrhovnem sodišču, na podlagi katerega je bil izvoljen prvi predsednik vrhovnega sodišča.
The Minister of Justice presented a draft law on the National Council for the Judiciary.
Dne 13. marca 2017 je nacionalni sodni svet umaknil štiri predloge, vložene pri ustavnem sodišču, zaradi sprememb sestave senatov po odločbi predsednice ustavnega sodišča.
On 25 January 2017, the Minister of Justice presented a draft law on the National School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution.
Dne 12. aprila 2017 je skupina 50 poslancev Sejma predložila osnutek zakona o spremembi zakona o organizaciji splošnih sodišč.
On 10 February 2017, the Court of Appeals in Warsaw referred a question of law to the Supreme Court which relates to the assessment of the legality of the appointment of judge Julia Przyłębska to the office of President of the Constitutional Tribunal.
Dne 11. maja 2017 je Sejm sprejel zakon o spremembi zakona o nacionalni šoli za sodnike in državne tožilce, zakona o organizaciji splošnih sodišč in nekaterih drugih zakonov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon o nacionalni šoli za sodnike).
The Supreme Court has not yet rendered a judgement.
Zakon je bil objavljen 13. junija 2017.
On 24 February 2017, the Sejm appointed a new judge in replacement to a judge who resigned from his position in the Constitutional Tribunal to become a judge in the Polish Supreme Court.
Komisija je 16. maja 2017 o stanju pravne države na Poljskem obvestila Svet za splošne zadeve.
On 1 March 2017, a group of 50 members of the Sejm asked the Constitutional Tribunal to establish the unconstitutionality of the provisions of the law on the Supreme Court on the basis of which the First President of the Supreme Court had been elected.
Vsi so se na splošno strinjali, da je pravna država v skupnem interesu ter skupna odgovornost institucij EU in držav članic.
On 13 March 2017, the National Council for the Judiciary withdrew four motions lodged with the Constitutional Tribunal due to the changes introduced to the composition of the relevant hearing panels following a decision by the President of the Tribunal.
Zelo velika večina držav članic je podprla vlogo Komisije in prizadevanja za rešitev tega vprašanja.
On 12 April 2017, a group of 50 members of the Sejm presented a draft law amending the law on Common Courts Organisation.
Države članice so poljsko vlado pozvale, naj ponovno začne dialog s Komisijo za rešitev obstoječih vprašanj, in izrazile pričakovanje, da jih bodo v Svetu za splošne zadeve ustrezno sproti obveščali.
On 11 May 2017, the Sejm adopted the law amending the law on the National School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation and certain other laws (‘law on the National School of Judiciary’).
Po izteku mandata prejšnjega podpredsednika ustavnega sodišča je 5. julija 2017 predsednik republike imenoval novega podpredsednika ustavnega sodišča, in sicer Mariusza Muszyńskega, čeprav je ta eden od treh ustavnih sodnikov, ki so bili imenovani nezakonito.
The law was published on 13 June 2017.
Dne 5. julija 2017 je skupina poslancev Sejma ustavno sodišče pozvala, naj ugotovi neustavnost določb, ki vrhovnemu sodišču omogočajo, da potrdi veljavnost imenovanja predsednika ustavnega sodišča s strani predsednika republike.
On 16 May 2017, the Commission informed the General Affairs Council on the situation of the rule of law in Poland.
Dne 12. julija 2017 je skupina poslancev Sejma predložila osnutek zakona o vrhovnem sodišču, ki je med drugim določal razrešitev in prisilno upokojitev vseh sodnikov vrhovnega sodišča, razen tistih, ki jih navede minister za pravosodje.
There was broad agreement around the table that the rule of law is a common interest and a common responsibility of EU institutions and Member States.
Komisija je 13. julija 2017 pisala poljski vladi in izrazila pomisleke glede zadnjih zakonodajnih predlogov v zvezi s sodnim sistemom in vrhovnim sodiščem, pri čemer je poudarila, kako pomembno je, da se ti predlogi ne sprejmejo, da bi bil mogoč smiseln dialog, ter poljskega zunanjega ministra in poljskega ministra za pravosodje povabila na čimprejšnji sestanek v zvezi s tem.
On 23 June 2017, the European Council generally endorsed the country-specific recommendations addressed to the Member States in the context of the 2017 European Semester.
Poljska vlada je 19. julija 2017 odgovorila na dopis Komisije z dne 13. julija 2017, pri čemer je omenila sedanje zakonodajne reforme poljskega sodstva in Komisijo pozvala, naj predstavi konkretne pomisleke glede novih zakonov, da bi lahko o njih nadalje razpravljali.
The recommendation addressed to Poland contains a recital underlining that ‘Legal certainty and trust in the quality and predictability of regulatory, tax and other policies and institutions are important factors that could allow an increase in the investment rate.
Dne 22. julija 2017 je senat odobril zakon o vrhovnem sodišču.
The rule of law and an independent judiciary are also essential in this context.
Dne 24. julija 2017 je predsednik republike izdal izjavo o svoji odločitvi, da zakon o vrhovnem sodišču in zakon o nacionalnem sodnem svetu vrne v obravnavo Sejmu.
Addressing serious concerns related to the rule of law will help improve legal certainty’.
Predsednik republike je 25. julija 2017 podpisal zakon o spremembi zakona o organizaciji splošnih sodišč –
On 11 July 2017, the country-specific recommendations were adopted by the Economic and Financial Affairs Council [5].
SPREJELA NASLEDNJE PRIPOROČILO:
On 5 July 2017, following the end of the mandate of the previous Vice-President of the Constitutional Tribunal, the President of the Republic appointed a new Vice-President of the Tribunal, Mr Mariusz Muszyński, despite the fact that he was one of the three judges in the Tribunal appointed unlawfully.
Republika Poljska bi morala ustrezno upoštevati analizo Komisije, predstavljeno v nadaljevanju, in sprejeti ukrepe iz oddelka 5 tega priporočila, da bi ugotovljene pomisleke obravnavala v določenem roku.
On 5 July 2017, a group of members of the Sejm asked the Constitutional Tribunal to establish the unconstitutionality of provisions enabling the Supreme Court to assert the validity of the appointment of the President of the Tribunal by the President of the Republic.
PODROČJE UPORABE PRIPOROČILA
On 12 July 2017, a group of members of the Sejm submitted a draft law on the Supreme Court which stipulated, inter alia, the dismissal and forced retirement of all Supreme Court judges, save those indicated by the Minister of Justice.
Na tej podlagi oblikuje priporočila poljskim organom o tem, kako te pomisleke obravnavati.
On 13 July 2017, the Commission wrote to the Polish Government to express its concerns about the recent legislative proposals relating to the judicial system and to the Supreme Court, underlined the importance of refraining from adopting these proposals in order to allow for a meaningful dialogue, and invited the Polish Foreign Minister and Polish Justice Minister to a meeting to that end at their earliest convenience.
Pomisleki se nanašajo na naslednja vprašanja:
On 14 July 2017, the Polish Government wrote to the Commission reiterating its previous explanations on the situation of the Constitutional Tribunal.
pomanjkanje neodvisne in zakonite ustavne presoje;
On 15 July 2017, the Senate approved the law amending the law on the National Council for the Judiciary and certain other laws (‘law on the National Council for the Judiciary’) and the law amending the law on the Ordinary Courts Organisation (‘law on Ordinary Courts Organisation’).
sprejetje nove zakonodaje v zvezi s poljskim sodstvom v poljskem parlamentu, ki vzbuja resne pomisleke glede neodvisnosti sodstva in znatno povečuje sistemsko nevarnost za pravno državo na Poljskem:
On 19 July 2017, the Polish Government replied to the Commission's letter of 13 July 2017, referring to the current legislative reforms of the Polish judiciary and asking the Commission to present its concrete concerns relating to the new laws in order to have a further discussion.
zakon o spremembi zakona o nacionalni šoli za sodnike in državne tožilce, zakona o organizaciji splošnih sodišč in nekaterih drugih zakonov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon o nacionalni šoli za sodnike), ki je bil v poljskem uradnem listu objavljen 13. junija 2017 in je začel veljati 20. junija 2017;
On 22 July 2017, the Senate approved the law on the Supreme Court.
zakon o spremembi zakona o nacionalnem sodnem svetu in nekaterih drugih zakonov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon o nacionalnem sodnem svetu), ki ga je senat odobril 15. julija 2017 in je bil vrnjen v obravnavo Sejmu 24. julija 2017;
On 25 July 2017, the President of the Republic signed the law amending the law on the Ordinary Courts Organisation,
zakon o vrhovnem sodišču, ki ga je senat odobril 22. julija 2017 in je bil vrnjen v obravnavo Sejmu 24. julija 2017.
HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:
POMANJKANJE NEODVISNE IN ZAKONITE USTAVNE PRESOJE
The Republic of Poland should duly take into account the Commission's analysis set out hereafter and take the measures figuring in Section 5 of this Recommendation so that the concerns identified are addressed within the time limit set.
Komisija je v priporočilu z dne 21. decembra 2016 priporočila, naj poljski organi sprejmejo naslednje ukrepe, ki jih je zahtevala že v priporočilu z dne 27. julija 2016:
SCOPE OF THE RECOMMENDATION
v celoti izvršijo sodbi ustavnega sodišča z dne 3. in 9. decembra 2015, ki zahtevata, da trije sodniki, ki jih je oktobra 2015 zakonito imenovala prejšnja sestava Sejma, nastopijo svojo funkcijo ustavnih sodnikov in da trije sodniki, ki jih je imenovala nova sestava Sejma brez ustrezne pravne podlage, svoje funkcije sodnika ne nastopijo, ne da bi bili zakonito imenovani, zato mora predsednik republike nujno sprejeti zaprisego treh sodnikov, ki jih je izvolila prejšnja sestava Sejma;
The present Recommendation complements the Recommendations of 27 July 2016 and 21 December 2016.
objavijo in v celoti izvršijo sodbo ustavnega sodišča z dne 9. marca 2016 in sodbo z dne 11. avgusta 2016 v zvezi z zakonom z dne 22. julija 2016 o ustavnem sodišču ter vse druge sodbe, izrečene po tem datumu, in prihodnje sodbe;
It examines which of the concerns raised in those recommendations have been addressed, sets out the remaining concerns and lists a number of new concerns of the Commission with regard to the rule of law in Poland which have arisen since then.
zagotovijo, da bodo vse reforme zakona o ustavnem sodišču spoštovale sodbe ustavnega sodišča, v celoti upoštevale mnenje Beneške komisije in zagotovile, da učinkovitost ustavnega sodišča kot varuha ustave ne bo ogrožena;
On this basis, it makes recommendations to the Polish authorities on how to address these concerns.
se vzdržijo ukrepov in javnih izjav, ki bi lahko ogrozile legitimnost in učinkovitost ustavnega sodišča.
The concerns relate to the following issues:
Komisija je poleg teh ukrepov priporočila, naj poljski organi:
the lack of an independent and legitimate constitutional review;
zagotovijo, da lahko ustavno sodišče urgentno učinkovito opravi presojo ustavnosti zakona o statusu sodnikov, zakona o organizaciji in postopkih ter izvedbenega zakona in da se zadevne sodbe nemudoma objavijo in v celoti izvršijo;
the adoption by the Polish Parliament of new legislation relating to the Polish judiciary which raises grave concerns as regards judicial independence and increases significantly the systemic threat to the rule of law in Poland:
zagotovijo, da ne pride do imenovanja novega predsednika ustavnega sodišča, dokler niso objavljene in v celoti izvršene sodbe ustavnega sodišča o ustavnosti novih zakonov in dokler trije sodniki, ki jih je oktobra 2015 zakonito imenovala 7. sestava Sejma, ne nastopijo svojih funkcij ustavnih sodnikov;
the law amending the law on the National School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation and certain other laws (‘law on the National School of Judiciary’); published in the Polish Official Journal on 13 June 2017 and which entered into force on 20 June 2017;
zagotovijo, da dokler novi predsednik ustavnega sodišča ni zakonito imenovan, tega nadomešča podpredsednik ustavnega sodišča in ne vršilec dolžnosti predsednika oziroma oseba, imenovana za predsednika ustavnega sodišča dne 21. decembra 2016.
the law amending the law on the National Council for the Judiciary and certain other laws (‘law on the National Council for the Judiciary’); approved by the Senate on 15 July 2017; this law was referred back to the Sejm on 24 July 2017.
Komisija ugotavlja, da ni bil izveden nobeden od priporočenih ukrepov, ki jih je navedla Komisija:
the law amending the law on the Ordinary Courts Organisation (‘law on Ordinary Courts Organisation’); approved by the Senate on 15 July 2017 and signed by the President on 25 July;
trije sodniki, ki jih je oktobra 2015 zakonito imenoval prejšnji zakonodajalec, še vedno ne morejo nastopiti svoje funkcije ustavnih sodnikov.
the law on the Supreme Court; approved by the Senate on 22 July 2017; this law was referred back to the Sejm on 24 July 2017.
Nasprotno je vršilka dolžnosti predsednika ustavnega sodišča trem sodnikom, ki jih je 8. sestava Sejma imenovala brez veljavne pravne podlage, omogočila nastop funkcije;
THE LACK OF AN INDEPENDENT AND LEGITIMATE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW
tri pomembne sodbe ustavnega sodišča z dne 9. marca 2016, 11. avgusta 2016 in 7. novembra 2016 še vedno niso bile objavljene in so bile odstranjene iz registra ustavnega sodišča, ki je dostopen z njegovega spletišča.
In its Recommendation of 21 December 2016, the Commission recommended that the Polish authorities take the following actions already requested in its Recommendation of 27 July 2016:
Nasprotno pa so bile druge sodbe, ki še niso bile objavljene v času sprejetja priporočila z dne 21. decembra 2016, objavljene v uradnem listu 29. decembra 2016;
implement fully the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 3 and 9 December 2015 which requires that the three judges that were lawfully nominated in October 2015 by the previous legislature can take up their function of judge in the Constitutional Tribunal, and that the three judges nominated by the new legislature without a valid legal basis do not take up the post of judge without being validly elected; for this reason, the President of the Republic is required to urgently take the oath of the three judges elected by the previous legislature;
zakon o statusu sodnikov, zakon o organizaciji in postopkih ter izvedbeni zakon še vedno niso bili predmet nujne učinkovite presoje ustavnosti na ustavnem sodišču, nova predsednica ustavnega sodišča pa je bila imenovana, preden bi do take presoje lahko prišlo;
publish and implement fully the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 9 March 2016 and the judgment of 11 August 2016 concerning the law of 22 July 2016 on the Constitutional Tribunal and other judgments rendered after that date and future judgments;
po izteku mandata prejšnjega predsednika ustavnega sodišča nov predsednik še vedno ni bil zakonito imenovan.
ensure that any reform of the law on the Constitutional Tribunal respects the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal, takes the Opinions of the Venice Commission fully into account and ensures that the effectiveness of the Constitutional Tribunal as a guarantor of the Constitution is not undermined;
Prejšnjega predsednika ni nadomestil podpredsednik ustavnega sodišča, temveč vršilka dolžnosti predsednika in pozneje oseba, imenovana za predsednico ustavnega sodišča dne 21. decembra 2016.
refrain from actions and public statements which could undermine the legitimacy and efficiency of the Constitutional Tribunal.
Kakor je Komisija pojasnila v priporočilu z dne 21. decembra 2016 [6], po njenem mnenju postopek, s katerim je bila imenovana nova predsednica ustavnega sodišča, vključuje bistvene kršitve načela pravne države.
In addition to these actions, the Commission recommended that the Polish authorities:
Postopek je začela vršilka dolžnosti predsednika, katere imenovanje je vzbudilo resne pomisleke glede načel delitve oblasti in neodvisnosti sodstva, kot ju varuje poljska ustava.
ensure that the Constitutional Tribunal can as a matter of urgency effectively review the constitutionality of the law on the Status of Judges, the law on Organisation and Proceedings and the Implementing law, and that the judgments concerned are published without delay and implemented fully;
Poleg tega je bilo s postopkom trem „decembrskim sodnikom“, ki jih je nezakonito imenovala nova sestava Sejma, omogočeno, da sodelujejo v procesu, zato je bil celoten postopek izbora neustaven.
ensure that no appointment of the new President of the Constitutional Tribunal take place as long as the judgments by the Constitutional Tribunal on the constitutionality of the new laws have not been published and implemented fully, and as long as the three judges that were lawfully nominated in October 2015 by the 7th term of the Sejm have not taken up their judicial functions in the Tribunal;
Podobno je dejstvo, da zakonito izvoljeni „oktobrski sodniki“ niso mogli sodelovati v postopku, prav tako vplivalo na izid in s tem razvrednotilo postopek.
ensure that as long as a new President of the Constitutional Tribunal has not been lawfully appointed, he is replaced by the Vice-President of the Tribunal and not by an acting President, or by the person appointed as President of the Tribunal on 21 December 2016.
Poleg tega sta zelo kratki rok sklica generalne skupščine in zavrnitev preložitve zasedanja vzbudila resne pomisleke.
The Commission observes that none of the recommended actions set out by the Commission have been implemented:
Izvolitev kandidatov s strani samo šestih sodnikov ni bila združljiva s sodbo ustavnega sodišča z dne 7. novembra 2016, v skladu s katero je treba člen 194(2) ustave razumeti tako, da določa, da predsednik republike imenuje predsednika ustavnega sodišča med kandidati, ki so prejeli večino glasov na generalni skupščini ustavnega sodišča.
the three judges that were lawfully nominated in October 2015 by the previous legislature have still not been able to take up their function of judge in the Constitutional Tribunal.
Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da je po imenovanju predsednice ustavnega sodišča več dogodkov še bolj ogrozilo zakonitost ustavnega sodišča.
By contrast, the three judges nominated by the 8th term of the Sejm without a valid legal basis were admitted to take up their function by the acting President of the Tribunal;
Zlasti naslednji: podpredsednika ustavnega sodišča, katerega položaj je ustavno priznan, je novoimenovana predsednica ustavnega sodišča obvezala, naj izkoristi preostali dopust do izteka svojega mandata; zaradi tožbe, ki jo je vložil generalni državni tožilec, da bi izpodbijal veljavnost izvolitve treh ustavnih sodnikov leta 2010, so bili ti sodniki pozneje izključeni iz sodnih dejavnosti ustavnega sodišča; nova predsednica ustavnega sodišča je spremenila sestave, ki obravnavajo zadeve, in zadeve so bile predodeljene senatom, ki delno vključujejo nezakonito imenovane sodnike; zahteve, zlasti varuha človekovih pravic, naj se nezakonito imenovani sodniki odstranijo iz senatov, ki odločajo o zadevah, so bile zavrnjene; znatno število sodb so izdali sestavi, ki so vključevali nezakonito imenovane sodnike; nazadnje, po izteku mandata podpredsednika je bil za novega podpredsednika ustavnega sodišča imenovan nezakonito imenovani sodnik.
three important judgements of the Constitutional Tribunal of 9 March 2016, 11 August 2016 and 7 November 2016 have still not been published and have been removed from the register of the Tribunal which is accessible from its website.
Ti dogodki so de facto privedli do popolnega preoblikovanja sestave ustavnega sodišča zunaj običajnega ustavnega postopka za imenovanje sodnikov.
Other judgements which were not yet published at the time of the adoption of the Recommendation of 21 December 2016 have by contrast been published on 29 December 2016 in the Journal of Laws;
Odgovor poljskih organov na dopolnitev priporočila Komisije, prejet 20. februarja 2017, ne zmanjšuje pomislekov Komisije in ne napoveduje nobenih konkretnih ukrepov za reševanje vprašanj, ki jih je navedla Komisija.
the law on the status of judges, the law on Organisation and Proceedings and the Implementing law, have still not been subject, as a matter of urgency, to the effective review of their constitutionality by the Constitutional Tribunal and the appointment of the new President of the Constitutional Tribunal took place before such review can occur;
V odgovoru trdijo, da so bile z novimi zakoni o ustavnem sodišču in imenovanjem nove predsednice ustavnega sodišča ustvarjene ustrezne razmere za njegovo delovanje po obdobju paralize zaradi političnih sporov politikov opozicije.
after the end of the mandate of the former President of the Constitutional Tribunal, a new President has still not been lawfully appointed.
Kar zadeva vlogo podpredsednika ustavnega sodišča, v odgovoru ni upoštevano dejstvo, da je v ustavi izrecno priznan položaj podpredsednika, za katerega se uporablja enak postopek imenovanja kot za predsednika ustavnega sodišča.
The former President was not replaced by the Vice-President of the Tribunal but by an acting President and, subsequently, by the person appointed as President of the Tribunal on 21 December 2016.
Kar zadeva imenovanje vršilca dolžnosti predsednika ustavnega sodišča, v odgovoru ni navedena nobena pravna podlaga iz ustave, temveč se šteje, da je bil to izredni prilagoditveni mehanizem, ki so ga narekovale izredne okoliščine.