natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It should be clarified that such conversion rates apply not only to commitments for the rearing of local breeds in danger of being lost to farming but to all livestock-related commitments under Articles 28, 29 and 34 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da se ti količniki za pretvorbo uporabljajo ne samo za obveznosti glede reje lokalnih pasem, ki jim grozi prenehanje reje, ampak tudi za vse obveznosti v zvezi z veliko živino v skladu s členi 28, 29 in 34 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013.
Point 8(2) of Part 1 and point 5(2) of Part 2 of Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 lay down certain rules on the description of the measures in rural development programmes and in national frameworks.
Točka 8(2) dela 1 in točka 5(2) dela 2 Priloge I k Izvedbeni Uredbi (EU) št. 808/2014 določata nekatera pravila za opis ukrepov v okviru programov razvoja podeželja in v nacionalnem okviru.
Annex II to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 defines the conversion rates of animals to livestock units referred to in Article 9 and provides that those conversion rates may be increased for all categories included in the table and decreased for other poultry, taking into account scientific evidence to be explained and duly justified in the rural development programmes.
Priloga II k Izvedbeni Uredbi (EU) št. 808/2014 določa količnike za pretvorbo živali v glave velike živine iz člena 9 in določa, da se ti količniki za pretvorbo lahko povečajo za vse kategorije, vključene v tabelo, in zmanjšajo za „ostalo perutnino“, pri čemer se upoštevajo znanstveni dokazi, ki jih je treba pojasniti in ustrezno utemeljiti v programih razvoja podeželja.
Member States should be given the possibility to decrease those conversion rates not only for ‘other poultry’ but for all categories included in the table where it is justified and based on scientific evidence.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da zmanjšajo te količnike za pretvorbo ne samo za „drugo perutnino“, temveč za vse kategorije, vključene v tabelo, če je to upravičeno in utemeljeno na znanstvenih dokazih.
Point 2.2 of Part 1 of Annex III to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 establishes minimum requirements for information and publicity actions by the beneficiaries during the implementation of an operation.
Točka 2.2 dela 1 Priloge III k Izvedbeni Uredbi (EU) št. 808/2014 določa minimalne zahteve za ukrepe informiranja in obveščanja javnosti, ki jih izvedejo upravičenci med izvajanjem dejavnosti.
Point 2.2(b) provides for different requirements according to the total public support.
Točka 2.2(b) določa različne zahteve glede na skupno javno podporo.
In the interest of ensuring proportionate and harmonised requirements, a single threshold should be set at EUR 50000.
Za zagotovitev sorazmernih in usklajenih zahtev bi bilo treba določiti enoten prag v višini 50000 EUR.
In addition, taking into account the particular nature of the area and animal related measures and of other measures which do not concern investments, Member States should be allowed to decide if these measures should be concerned by the information obligations.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba ob upoštevanju posebne narave ukrepov v zvezi z območji in živalmi ter drugih ukrepov, ki ne zadevajo naložb, državam članicam omogočiti, da odločijo, ali bi morale za te ukrepe veljati obveznosti o obveščanju.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 808/2014 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 is amended as follows:
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 808/2014 se spremeni:
in the third subparagraph of Article 4(2), the following point (e) is added:
V tretjem pododstavku člena 4(2) se doda naslednja točka (e):
in case of amendments related to financial instruments referred to in Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013.’;
v primeru sprememb v zvezi s finančnimi instrumenti iz člena 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.“
Where commitments made under Articles 28, 29 and 34 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 refer to livestock units, the conversion rates of the various categories of animals to livestock units as set out in Annex II apply.
Kadar se obveznosti, prevzete v skladu s členi 28, 29 in 34 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, nanašajo na glave velike živine, se uporabljajo količniki za pretvorbo različnih kategorij živali v glave velike živine, kot so določeni v Prilogi II.
Where commitments under Articles 28, 29 and 34 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 are expressed in units other than those set out in Annex II to that Regulation, Member States may calculate payments on the basis of those other units.
Kadar so obveznosti iz členov 28, 29 in 34 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 izražene v enotah, ki se razlikujejo od tistih iz Priloge II k navedeni uredbi, lahko države članice izračunajo izplačila na osnovi teh drugih enot.
In such case, the Member States shall ensure that the maximum amounts per year eligible for EAFRD support set out in that Annex are complied with.
V takem primeru države članice zagotovijo, da se upoštevajo najvišji letni zneski, ki so upravičeni do podpore iz EKSRP in so določeni v navedeni prilogi.
Except for payments for commitments for the rearing of local breeds in danger of being lost to farming referred to in Article 28(10)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, payments under Articles 28, 29 and 34 of that Regulation cannot be granted per livestock unit.’;
Razen plačil za obveznosti za rejo lokalnih pasem, ki jim grozi prenehanje reje iz člena 28(10)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, plačil na podlagi členov 28, 29 in 34 navedene uredbe ni mogoče dodeliti na glavo velike živine.“
Annex I is amended as set out in Annex I to this Regulation;
Priloga I se spremeni, kot je določeno v Prilogi I k tej uredbi.
Annex II is replaced by the text in Annex II to this Regulation;
Priloga II se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge II k tej uredbi.
Annex III is amended as set out in Annex III to this Regulation.
Priloga III se spremeni, kot je določeno v Prilogi III k tej uredbi.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ L 227, 31.7.2014, p. 18).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 808/2014 z dne 17. julija 2014 o določitvi pravil za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) (UL L 227, 31.7.2014, str. 18).
Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 is amended as follows:
Priloga I k Uredbi (EU) št. 808/2014 se spremeni:
in point 8(2) of Part 1, point (c) is replaced by the following:
V točki 8(2) dela 1 se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
scope, level of support, eligible beneficiaries, and where relevant, methodology for calculation of the amount or support rate broken down by sub-measure and/or type of operation where necessary.
obseg, raven podpore, upravičence in, če je to ustrezno, metodologijo za izračun zneska ali stopnje podpore, ki so po potrebi razčlenjeni po podukrepih in/ali vrstah operacije.
For each type of operation specification of eligible costs, eligibility conditions, applicable amounts and support rates and principles with regard to the setting of selection criteria.
Za vsako vrsto operacije opredelitev upravičenih stroškov, pogojev za upravičenost, veljavnih zneskov in stopenj podpore ter načel za določanje meril za izbor.
Where support is provided to a financial instrument implemented under points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 38(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, description of the type of financial instrument, general categories of final recipients, general categories of eligible costs, maximum level of support and principles with regard to the setting of selection criteria.’;
Kadar se podpora zagotovi za finančni instrument, ki se izvede v skladu s točkama (a) in (b) prvega pododstavka člena 38(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, opis vrste finančnega instrumenta, splošne kategorije končnih prejemnikov, splošne kategorije upravičenih stroškov, najvišjo raven podpore ter načela za določanje meril za izbor.“
in point 5(2) of Part 2, point (c) is replaced by the following:
V točki 5(2) dela 2 se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
Where support is provided to a financial instrument implemented under points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 38(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, description of the type of financial instrument, general categories of final recipients, general categories of eligible costs, maximum level of support and principles with regard to the setting of selection criteria.’.
Kadar se podpora zagotovi za finančni instrument, ki se izvede v skladu s točkama (a) in (b) prvega pododstavka člena 38(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, opis vrste finančnega instrumenta, splošne kategorije končnih prejemnikov, splošne kategorije upravičenih stroškov, najvišjo raven podpore ter načela za določanje meril za izbor.“
Conversion rates of animals to livestock units (“LU”) referred to in Article 9(1) and (2)
Količniki za pretvorbo živali v glave velike živine (GVŽ) iz člena 9(1) in (2)
Bulls, cows and other bovine animals over two years and equine animals over six months
Biki, krave in drugo govedo, starejši od dveh let, ter kopitarji, starejši od šestih mesecev
1,0 LU
1,0 GVŽ
0,6 LU
0,6 GVŽ
Bovine animals below six months
Govedo, mlajše od šestih mesecev
0,4 LU
0,4 GVŽ
0,15 LU
0,15 GVŽ
Breeding sows > 50 kg
Plemenske svinje > 50 kg
0,5 LU
0,5 GVŽ
0,3 LU
0,3 GVŽ
0,014 LU
0,014 GVŽ
0,03 LU
0,03 GVŽ
For the categories or sub-categories of animals in this table, conversion rates may be increased or decreased exceptionally, taking into account scientific evidence to be explained and duly justified in the RDPs.
Za kategorije ali podkategorije živali v tej tabeli se količniki za pretvorbo lahko izjemoma povečajo ali zmanjšajo, pri čemer se upoštevajo znanstveni dokazi, ki jih je treba pojasniti in ustrezno utemeljiti v programih za razvoj podeželja.
Other categories of animals may be added exceptionally.
Druge kategorije živali se lahko dodajo izjemoma.
Conversion rates for any such categories shall be established taking into account particular circumstances and scientific evidence to be explained and duly justified in the RDPs.’
Za take kategorije se količniki za pretvorbo določijo ob upoštevanju posebnih okoliščin in znanstvenih dokazov, ki jih je treba pojasniti in ustrezno utemeljiti v programih razvoja podeželja.“
In point 2.2 of Part 1 of Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 808/2014, point (b) is replaced by the following:
V točki 2.2 dela 1 Priloge III k Uredbi (EU) št. 808/2014 se točka (b) nadomesti z naslednjim:
for operations not falling under point (c) the total public support of which exceeds EUR 50000, placing at least a poster (minimum size A3) or plaque with information about the project, highlighting the financial support from the Union, at a location readily visible to the public.
v zvezi z operacijami, ki ne spadajo pod točko (c) in katerih skupna javna podpora presega 50000 EUR, izobesi vsaj en plakat z informacijami o projektu (najmanj velikosti A3) ali tablo z informacijami o projektu, ki izpostavlja finančno podporo Unije, in sicer na dobro vidnem javnem mestu.
However, Member States may decide that this requirement shall not apply to, or that the threshold shall be increased for, operations under points (a) and (b) of Article 21(1) (concerning income forgone and maintenance costs) and Articles 28 to 31, 33, 34 and 40 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
Vendar se lahko države članice odločijo, da ta zahteva ne velja za operacije iz točk (a) in (b) člena 21(1) (v zvezi z izpadom dohodka in stroški vzdrževanja) ter členov 28 do 31, 33, 34 in 40 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 ali da se zanje prag poviša.
Member States may also decide that this requirement shall not apply to, or that the threshold shall be increased for, other operations which do not result in an investment where, because of the nature of the operation funded, it is not possible to identify a suitable location for the poster or plaque.
Prav tako se države članice lahko odločijo, da ta zahteva ne velja za druge operacije, ki ne pomenijo naložbe in pri katerih zaradi narave financirane operacije ni mogoče določiti primerne lokacije za namestitev plakata ali table, oziroma da se zanje prag poviša.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/670
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/670
introducing prior Union surveillance of imports of certain iron and steel products originating in certain third countries
o uvedbi predhodnega nadzora uvoza nekaterih železnih in jeklenih izdelkov s poreklom iz nekaterih tretjih držav s strani Unije
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/478 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on common rules for imports [1], and in particular Article 10 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2015/478 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2015 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz [1] in zlasti člena 10 Uredbe,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/755 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on common rules for imports from certain third countries [2], and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2015/755 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2015 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz iz nekaterih tretjih držav [2] in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
After consulting the Committee on Safeguards and Common Rules for exports,
po posvetovanju z odborom za zaščitne ukrepe in skupna pravila za izvoz,
According to Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 prior Union surveillance may be introduced where the trend in imports of a product threatens to cause injury to Union producers and where the interest of the Union so require.
V skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (EU) 2015/478 se lahko uvede predhodni nadzor Unije, kadar uvozni trend izdelka grozi, da bo povzročil škodo proizvajalcem Unije, in kadar interesi Unije tako zahtevajo.
Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2015/755 also allows for the possibility to introduce prior surveillance where the Union's interests so require.
Tudi člen 7 Uredbe (EU) 2015/755 dopušča možnost uvedbe predhodnega nadzora, kadar je to v interesu Unije.
The European Commission has published a communication on 16 March 2016 setting out possibilities how to overcome the recent challenges faced by the European steel producers [3].
Evropska komisija je 16. marca 2016 objavila sporočilo o določitvi možnosti, kako premagati nedavne izzive, s katerimi se soočajo evropski proizvajalci jekla [3].
Imports into the Union of iron and steel products in general increased by 32 % between 2012 and 2015, from 41,8 million tonnes to 55,0 million tonnes.
Uvoz izdelkov iz železa in jekla v Unijo se je na splošno med letoma 2012 in 2015 povečal za 32 %, in sicer s 41,8 milijona ton na 55,0 milijona ton.
During the same period, prices of overall steel imports decreased by 17 %.
V istem obdobju so se cene uvoza izdelkov iz jekla na splošno zmanjšale za 17 %.
On the other hand, Union exports of steel products decreased by almost 20 % on average, from 62,3 in 2012 to 50,7 million tonnes in 2015 [4].
Po drugi strani pa se je izvoz izdelkov iz jekla iz Unije v povprečju zmanjšal za skoraj 20 %, in sicer z 62,3 v letu 2012 na 50,7 milijona ton v letu 2015 [4].
For these products, imports increased by 53 % over the same period, from 13,3 million tonnes in 2012 to 20,2 million tonnes in 2015, and the corresponding import prices dropped by 22 % on average [6].
Svetovna nazivna moč proizvodnje jekla je bila po podatkih Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj („OECD“) ocenjena na 2243 milijonov ton v letu 2014, kar je več kot dvakratna raven zmogljivosti 1060 milijonov ton iz leta 2000.
Since the early 2000s the capacity to produce steel at global level has increased rapidly with most of the new capacity created in the People's Republic of China (‘China’).
Poleg tega se je skupni izvoz zlasti s Kitajske močno povečal zaradi splošnega upada gospodarske rasti in upada domačega povpraševanja.
The world's nominal steelmaking capacity was estimated to reach 2243 million tonnes in 2014, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (‘OECD’), a level that is more than twice as high as the capacity level of 1060 million tonnes observed in 2000.
To je znižalo cene jekla po svetu.
In parallel, overall exports increased dramatically mainly from China, due to the overall economic downturn and the decreasing domestic demand.
Kitajska je danes prvi proizvajalec jekla na svetu s proizvodnjo surovega jekla v višini 822,7 milijona ton v letu 2014 [7], kar je skoraj polovico svetovne proizvodnje jekla.
This has depressed the steel prices worldwide.
Kitajske presežne zmogljivosti so ocenjene na približno 350 milijonov ton [8].
China is today the first world producer of steel with 822,7 million tonnes crude steel production in 2014 [7], which is almost half of the global steel production.
To predstavlja približno 40 % kitajske proizvodnje in skoraj dvakratno skupno letno proizvodnjo jekla v Uniji.
The Chinese excess capacity is estimated to be around 350 million tonnes [8].
Že leta 2015 je 10 % kitajskega izvoza prišlo v Unijo, kar je predstavljalo več kot 30 % skupnega uvoza Unije.
This represents about 40 % of China's production and almost double of the total Union yearly production of steel.
Posledično je skromno rast domačega povpraševanja Unije v celoti pokril uvoz.
Already in 2015 10 % of the Chinese exports reached the Union, accounting for more than 30 % of total Union imports.
Glede na to, da je Evropska unija pomemben trg za jeklo z vidika velikosti in cene, je zelo verjetno, da se bo ves presežek jekla še naprej preusmeril v Unijo.
As a consequence, the modest rise of Union domestic demand was fully taken by imports.
Istočasno se dostop do trgov tretjih držav v zadnjem času v veliki meri zmanjšuje.
Given the fact that the Union is an important market for steel in terms of size and price, it is more than likely that any excess in steel capacity will continue to be re-directed to the Union.
Države se vse bolj zatekajo k ukrepom trgovinske politike za odzivanje na krizo, s katero se sooča svetovna jeklarska industrija, in mnoga gospodarstva, ki prej niso uporabljala takih ukrepov, so jih zdaj sprejela.
At the same time, access to third country markets has been reduced to a significant extent recently.
Ti ukrepi so bili v različnih oblikah trgovinskih ovir, vključno s povečanjem tarif, protidampinškimi in protisubvencijskimi ukrepi, ter so bili uvedeni na trgih z velikim deležem svetovne potrošnje [9].
Governments increasingly resort to trade policy actions in response to the crisis facing the global steel industry and many economies that previously did not use such measures are now adopting them.
To še povečuje možnosti za preusmeritev trgovine z jeklom v Unijo.
These measures took different forms of trade barriers, including tariff increases, anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures, and concern markets with a significant share of the global consumption [9].
Jeklarska industrija Unije je še vedno vodilna na svetu v segmentu visoko tehnološko specializiranih izdelkov.
This is further increasing the possibilities of trade diversion of steel into the Union.
Vendar se je konkurenčni položaj proizvajalcev jekla Unije na svetovnem trgu jekla v zadnjih nekaj letih poslabšal.
Union steel industry remains a world leader in the highly technologically specialised product segment.
Dejansko se finančna uspešnost jeklarske industrije v Uniji v zadnjih letih hitro poslabšuje.
However, the Union steel makers' competitive position on the global steel market has deteriorated in the last few years.
Povprečna dobičkonosnost poslovanja je pod vzdržno ravnijo, naložbe se upočasnjujejo, stopnje zaposlenosti so se znižale in skoraj ni možnosti za širitev.
Indeed, the financial performance of the Union steel industry has been deteriorating rapidly in the recent years.
Industrija Unije se mora soočati z visokimi stroški energije in odvisnostjo od uvoženih surovin.
Average operating profitability is below sustainable levels, investments have been slowing down, employment levels have decreased and there is hardly any room for expansion.
Čeprav je bila proizvodnja surovega jekla v obdobju 2013–2015 v Uniji sorazmerno stabilna v višini 166 do 169 milijonov ton letno, je prišlo v drugi polovici leta 2015 do znatnega zmanjšanja za približno 10 % glede na prvo polovico leta.
The Union industry has to face high energy costs and dependence on imported raw material.
Na podlagi nedavnih trendov uvoza jeklenih izdelkov, sedanjega ranljivega položaja industrije Unije, še naprej majhnega povpraševanja na trgu Unije in verjetnosti, da se bodo sedanje in prihodnje presežne zmogljivosti preusmerile v Unijo, če si bo povpraševanje na trgu opomoglo, se zdi, da obstaja nevarnost škode za proizvajalce Unije.
Furthermore, even though the production of crude steel in the Union remained relatively stable in the period 2013-2015 at around 166 to 169 million tonnes per year, during the second semester of 2015 there was a significant contraction of around 10 % as compared to the first semester.
Zato je v interesu Unije, da se izvaja predhodni nadzor nad uvozom nekaterih izdelkov iz jekla, da se zagotovijo izčrpni statistični podatki za hitro analizo uvoznih trendov iz vseh držav, ki niso članice EU.
On the basis of recent trends in imports of steel products, of the current vulnerable situation of the Union industry, the continuing weak demand on the Union market and the likelihood that current and future excess capacity would be re-directed to Union if demand recovers, a threat of injury to Union producers is therefore deemed to exist.
Zaradi občutljivosti trga jekla v EU na nenadne spremembe na svetovnih trgih jekla so potrebne hitro dostopne napovedi o gibanju trgovine.
Thus, the Union interest requires that imports of certain steel products should be subject to prior Union surveillance in order to provide advanced statistical information permitting rapid analysis of import trends from all non-EU member countries.
To je še zlasti pomembno v sedanji krizi, ko vlada negotovost v zvezi s strukturnim povečanjem povpraševanja in dejanskih koristi industrije EU od takšnega povečanja.
Rapid and anticipated trade data is necessary to deal with the vulnerability of the EU steel market to sudden changes on world steel markets.
Glede na razvoj nekaterih izdelkov iz jekla na trgu je primerno, da so v obseg predhodnega nadzora zajeti izdelki, ki so navedeni v Prilogi I k tej uredbi.
This is particularly important in the present crisis situation marked by uncertainties as to whether the demand will structurally pick up and whether the EU industry will actually benefit from it.
Zaradi vzpostavitve notranjega trga morajo biti formalnosti, ki jih morajo opraviti vsi uvozniki v Unijo, identične, ne glede na kraj carinjenja.
In view of the developments on the market of certain steel products, it is appropriate that the scope of the prior surveillance includes the products listed in Annex I to this Regulation.
Zaradi olajšanja zbiranja podatkov je treba, da se za sprostitev izdelkov, zajetih v tej uredbi, v prosti promet, predloži listina o nadzoru, za katero veljajo enotna merila.
The completion of the internal market requires that the formalities to be accomplished by any importer into the Union should be identical wherever the goods may be cleared.
Ta zahteva se začne uporabljati 21 delovnih dni po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe, da se ne prepreči sprostitev izdelkov, ki so na poti v Unijo, v prosti promet in da se omogoči dovolj časa, da lahko uvozniki zahtevajo potrebne dokumente.
In order to facilitate the collection of data, the release for free circulation of the products covered by this Regulation should be made subject to presentation of a surveillance document meeting uniform criteria.
Ta dokument bi morali na zahtevo uvoznika potrditi organi države članice v določenem roku, ne da bi uvoznik s tem pridobil pravico do uvoza.