natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, it should be stated explicitly that the payment is calculated on the basis of the corresponding fraction of an eligible hectare.
Vendar bi bilo treba izrecno navesti, da se plačilo izračuna na podlagi zadevnega dela upravičenega hektara.
Articles 38 to 48 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 lay down rules supplementing the provisions on standard greening practices established by Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013.
Členi od 38 do 48 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014 določajo pravila o dopolnitvi določb o standardnih praksah zelene komponente iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013.
On the basis of the experience gained during the first year in which those practices were applied, it is necessary to amend certain aspects of those rules in order to simplify the implementation of the greening practices for the benefit of farmers and national administrations while maintaining or improving the environment and climate impact.
Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih v prvem letu uporabe navedenih praks, je treba spremeniti nekatere vidike teh pravil, da se poenostavi izvajanje praks zelene komponente, kar bo koristilo kmetom in nacionalnim upravam, obenem pa se bo ohranil ali izboljšal vpliv na okolje in podnebje.
In particular, the modifications should contribute to address the actions identified in the conclusions of the Mid-Term Review of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 and enable progress of the coverage of agricultural area by biodiversity related measures under the common agricultural policy [5].
Spremembe bi morale prispevati zlasti k obravnavi ukrepov, opredeljenih v sklepnih ugotovitvah Vmesnega pregleda strategije EU za biotsko raznovrstnost do leta 2020, ter omogočiti napredek pri obsegu kmetijskih površin, za katere se uporabljajo ukrepi v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo v skladu s skupno kmetijsko politiko [5].
In the rules on the calculation of shares of different crops for crop diversification set out in Article 40 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, the crop diversification period is based on traditional cultivation practices in Member States.
V pravilih o izračunu deležev različnih kmetijskih rastlin za njihovo diverzifikacijo iz člena 40 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014 obdobje diverzifikacije kmetijskih rastlin temelji na tradicionalnih pridelovalnih praksah v državah članicah.
It is appropriate to allow Member States to fix different periods at regional or sub-regional level in order to take into account possible diverse climatic conditions within a territory of a Member State.
Ustrezno je, da se državam članicam omogoči določitev različnih obdobij na regionalni ali podregionalni ravni, da se tako upoštevajo različne možne podnebne razmere na ozemlju države članice.
In some specific situations where a significant variety of crops on a small area exists, it should be possible, in order to simplify the declaration of crops grown, to declare them as one mixed crop.
V nekaterih posebnih primerih, ko je na majhni površini veliko različnih kmetijskih rastlin, bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se prijavijo kot ena mešana kmetijska rastlina, s čimer bi se poenostavila prijava gojenih kmetijskih rastlin.
As regards land lying fallow, setting a period in Article 45(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 during which there should be no agricultural production is fundamental to ensure the environmental effectiveness of such land and to avoid any confusion with other areas such as grasslands.
Kar zadeva zemljišče v prahi, je določitev obdobja iz člena 45(2) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014, v katerem ne bi smelo biti kmetijske proizvodnje, ključna za zagotovitev okoljske učinkovitosti takega zemljišča in preprečitev morebitne zamenjave z drugimi površinami, kot je travinje.
In order to take into account the different agro-climatic conditions across the Union, Member States should have the possibility to set such period to allow farmers to resume main crops before the end of the year.
Da bi se upoštevale različne kmetijske in podnebne razmere v Uniji, bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti določitev takih obdobij, da bi se kmetom omogočil ponovni začetek pridelovanja glavnih kmetijskih rastlin pred koncem leta.
However, such period should not be shorter than 6 months in order to meet the objectives of environmental effectiveness and to avoid any confusion with other areas.
Vendar tako obdobje ne bi smelo biti krajše od šestih mesecev, da se izpolnijo cilji okoljske učinkovitosti in prepreči morebitna zamenjava z drugimi površinami.
In order to reduce this uncertainty, simplify the management of the scheme for Member States' authorities and address the complexity encountered by farmers when declaring ecological focus areas, hedges and wooded strips referred to in point (a) of that provision and trees in line referred to in point (c) of that provision should be grouped as one type of landscape feature so that one single dimension limit applies to them.
Čeprav so največje dimenzije krajinskih značilnosti potrebne za zagotovitev, da je površina pretežno kmetijska, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 51 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014, velja tudi, da se na podlagi teh omejitev dimenzij ne bi smele izključiti značilnosti, ki presegajo te dimenzije, a so dragocene za biotsko raznovrstnost.
Moreover, for the same reasons, the areas referred to in Article 45(4)(d) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 should be grouped under field copses.
Zato bi se morala površina, ki se lahko v skladu s členom 45(4) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014 opredeli kot krajinska značilnosti, izračunati do največje dimenzije krajinske značilnosti.
Furthermore, even if, as stated in recital 51 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, maximum dimensions of landscape features are needed to ensure that the area is predominantly agricultural, such dimension limits should not lead to the exclusion of features that exceed such dimensions but which are valuable for biodiversity.
Zaradi zelo ugodnega vpliva obrežnega rastlinja iz petega pododstavka člena 45(4) in (5) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014 na okolje je ustrezno določiti, da bi bilo treba pri izračunu površin z ekološkim pomenom upoštevati vse obrežno rastlinje.
Therefore, the area which may be qualified as a landscape feature pursuant to Article 45(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 should be calculated up to the maximum dimension of the feature.
Iz razlogov, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 7 in 8 v zvezi s členom 45(4) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014, bi bilo treba robove polj iz točke (e) navedene določbe združiti z varovalnimi pasovi iz člena 45(5) navedene uredbe, poleg tega pa bi bilo treba za varovalne pasove in robove polj določiti eno omejitev dimenzij.
Given the high environmental benefit of riparian vegetation referred to in the fifth subparagraph of Article 45(4) and in Article 45(5) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, it is appropriate to set out that all riparian vegetation should be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the ecological focus areas.
Taka največja dimenzija za varovalne pasove in robove polj bi se morala nanašati na površino, ki se v skladu s členom 45(5) Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 639/2014 lahko obravnava kot varovalni pas in rob polja.
For the same reasons as mentioned in recitals 7 and 8 in relation to Article 45(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, field margins, currently referred to in point (e) of that provision, should be merged with buffer strips in Article 45(5) of that Regulation and a single dimension limit should be set in relation to buffer strips and field margins.
Da se kmetom zagotovi čim večja prožnost, bi bilo treba opredelitev varovalnih pasov v skladu z GAEC 1, SMR 1 ali SMR 10, kot je navedeno v Prilogi II k Uredbi (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], in robov polj, zaščitenih v skladu z GAEC 7, SMR 2 ali SMR 3, kot je navedeno v navedeni prilogi, dopolniti z drugimi varovalnimi pasovi in robovi polj, kar pomeni z vsemi vrstami pasov, ki v skladu s pravili o navzkrižni skladnosti niso zajete v teh dveh kategorijah.
Such maximum dimension in relation to buffer strips and field margins should refer to the area which may be qualified as buffer strips and field margins pursuant to Article 45(5) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 46(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 se lahko krajinske značilnosti in varovalni pasovi, ki mejijo na orno zemljišče, štejejo za površino z ekološkim pomenom.
In order to provide the maximum flexibility to farmers, the definition of buffer strips under GAEC 1, SMR 1 or SMR 10 as referred to in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] and field margins protected under GAEC 7, SMR 2 or SMR 3 as referred to in that Annex, should be supplemented by other buffer strips and field margins, meaning any kind of strips not covered by these two categories under cross-compliance rules.
Za zagotovitev čim ugodnejšega vpliva krajinskih značilnostih in varovalnih pasov iz člena 45(4) in (5) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014 na okolje ter spodbujanje varstva in ohranjanja dodatnih elementov bi bilo treba to določbo dopolniti s pravili, s katerimi bi se omogočila prožnost, pri čemer bi se upoštevali drugi okoljsko dragoceni elementi, ki so skladni z opredelitvijo teh vrst površin z ekološkim pomenom in ne mejijo na orno zemljišče kmetijskega gospodarstva.
The second subparagraph of Article 46(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 allows landscape features and buffer strips adjacent to arable land to be considered as ecological focus areas.
Če tak varovalni pas in rob polja ali krajinska značilnost meji na površino z ekološkim pomenom, ki neposredno meji na orno zemljišče kmetijskega gospodarstva, bi jo bilo torej treba prav tako obravnavati kot površino z ekološkim pomenom.
In order to maximise the environmental benefit of landscape features and buffer strips referred to in Article 45(4) and (5) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 and encourage the protection and maintenance of additional elements, this provision should be supplemented with rules offering flexibility by taking into account other environmentally valuable elements which fulfil the definition of these ecological focus area types and which are not adjacent to the arable land of the holding.
Iz razlogov, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 7 in 8 v zvezi s členom 45(4) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014, bi se morale največje dimenzije, določene za pasove upravičenih hektarov ob gozdu iz člena 45(7) navedene uredbe, nanašati na površino, ki se lahko v skladu z navedeno določbo obravnava kot tak pas.
Therefore, where such buffer strip and field margin or landscape feature is adjacent to the ecological focus area directly adjacent to the arable land of a holding, it should also be recognised as an ecological focus area.
Ob upoštevanju določb točke (g) prvega pododstavka člena 46(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 je ustrezno pojasniti, da je določitev zahtev glede uporabe mineralnih gnojil in/ali fitofarmacevtskih sredstev pomembna le, če so taki vložki odobreni.
For the same reasons as mentioned in recitals 7 and 8 in relation to Article 45(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, the maximum dimensions set in relation to strips of eligible hectares along forest edges referred to in Article 45(7) of that Regulation should refer to the area which may be qualified as such strips pursuant to that provision.
Sedanji rok za setev naknadnih posevkov in travne ruše iz člena 45(9) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014 ni vedno prilagojen kmetijskim in podnebnim razmeram.
In light of the provisions of point (g) of the first subparagraph of Article 46(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 it is appropriate to clarify that the establishment of the requirements as regards the use of mineral fertilisers and/or plant protection products is relevant only in case such input products are authorised.
Za boljše doseganje okoljskih ciljev te vrste površine z ekološkim pomenom je ustrezno, da se rok za setev naknadnih posevkov in travne ruše nadomesti z najkrajšim obdobjem, v katerem je treba vzdrževati površine pod naknadnimi posevki in travno rušo.
The existing deadline for sowing of catch crops and green cover laid down in Article 45(9) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 does not always fit with the agronomic and climatic conditions.
Za zagotovitev potrebne prožnosti in upoštevanje sezonskih vremenskih razmer bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti, da navedeno obdobje določijo na najprimernejši geografski ravni.
With a view to better achieving the environmental objectives of this ecological focus area type, it is appropriate to replace the deadline for sowing of catch crops and green cover with a minimum period of time during which areas under catch crops and green cover have to be in place.
Vendar je trajnost naknadnih posevkov in travne ruše na tleh ključni dejavnik za zagotavljanje učinkovite absorpcije preostalih nitratov in talne odeje, ko se na površini ne prideluje glavna kmetijska rastlina, zato bi bilo treba najkrajše trajanje obdobja določiti na ravni Unije.
In order to provide the necessary flexibility to take into account seasonal weather conditions, Member States should be allowed to fix that period at the most appropriate geographical level.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti z razlago o opredelitvi pojma trava ali druge zelene krmne rastline iz člena 4(1)(i) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 bi bilo treba omogočiti tudi podsevke stročnic med glavno kmetijsko rastlino.
However, since the permanence of catch crops and green cover on the ground is a key factor in ensuring an effective take up of residual nitrate and coverage of soil while the area is not covered by the main crop, the minimum length of the period should be set at Union level.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba za zagotovitev usklajenosti med enakovrednimi praksami, ki so zajete v obveznosti in sheme certificiranja iz člena 43(3)(a) oziroma (b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013, uskladiti pravila o obravnavi naknadnih posevkov ali travne ruše kot površin z ekološkim pomenom.
In order to be consistent with the interpretation provided on the definition of grasses or other herbaceous forage laid down in Article 4(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, under-sowing leguminous crops in the main crop should also be possible.
Čeprav bi se morale kot splošno pravilo kot površine z ekološkim pomenom obravnavati le površine z nemešanimi vrstami kmetijskih rastlin, ki vežejo dušik, se pri tradicionalnih pridelovalnih praksah take kmetijske rastline pogosto kombinirajo z drugimi kmetijskimi rastlinami, zato je ustrezno, da se v skladu s členom 45(10) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014 omogoči, da se tudi površine z mešanicami obravnavajo kot površine z ekološkim pomenom, če je zagotovljeno, da v takih mešanicah prevladujejo kmetijske rastline, ki vežejo dušik.
Furthermore, in order to ensure consistency between equivalent practices covered by commitments and certification schemes as referred to in Article 43(3)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, respectively, rules on qualifying catch crops or green cover as ecological focus areas should be aligned.
Poleg tega je bilo na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih z uporabo prvega pododstavka člena 45(10) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014, ter ob upoštevanju izvajanja Direktive Sveta 91/676/EGS [7] in Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES [8] ugotovljeno, da je določanje posebnih pravil o lokaciji teh kmetijskih rastlin, ki vežejo dušik, odvečno.
Even if, as a general rule only areas with nitrogen-fixing crops grown as pure species should be qualified as ecological focus areas, given that in traditional cultivation practices such crops are often mixed with other crops, it is appropriate to allow, under Article 45(10) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, that areas with mixtures may also be qualified as ecological focus areas provided that the predominance of the nitrogen-fixing crops in such mixtures is ensured.
Namesto tega bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti, da po potrebi določijo dodatne pogoje za kmetijske rastline, ki vežejo dušik, ter tako okrepiti prizadevanja držav članic za obravnavo tveganja za izpiranje dušika v jeseni.
In addition, based on the experience with the application of the first subparagraph of Article 45(10) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 and in light of the implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC [7] and Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [8], it is superfluous to prescribe specific rules on the location of these nitrogen-fixing crops.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba za zagotovitev usklajenosti med enakovrednimi praksami, ki so zajete v obveznosti in sheme certificiranja iz člena 43(3)(a) oziroma (b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013, uskladiti pravila o obravnavi površin s kmetijskimi rastlinami, ki vežejo dušik, kot površin z ekološkim pomenom.
Instead, and with a view to strengthening Member States efforts to address the risk of nitrogen leaching in the autumn, Member States should be allowed to establish additional conditions on nitrogen-fixing crops if necessary.
Izkušnje, pridobljene pri uporabi Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014, so pokazale, da je treba pri nekaterih določbah o vrstah površin z ekološkim pomenom podrobneje opredeliti zahtevo, da „ni proizvodnje“, vključno s pravili o košnji in paši, da se doseže cilj zagotavljanja biotske raznovrstnosti in zagotovi usklajenost z drugimi instrumenti skupne kmetijske politike.
Furthermore, in order to ensure consistency between equivalent practices covered by commitments and certification schemes as referred to in Article 43(3)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, respectively, rules on qualifying nitrogen-fixing crops as ecological focus area should be aligned.
V zvezi z zahtevo, da „ni kmetijske proizvodnje“, ki se uporablja za vrste površin z ekološkim pomenom iz člena 45(2), člena 45(4)(e) ter člena 45(5) in (7) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014, bi bilo treba zlasti pojasniti, da bi se morala proizvodnja razumeti kot kmetijska dejavnost v smislu člena 4(1)(c)(i) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 in ne v širšem smislu člena 4(1)(c)(ii) in (iii) navedene uredbe ter ne bi smela vplivati na pravila o minimalni talni odeji iz GAEC 4, kot so navedena v Prilogi II k Uredbi (EU) št. 1306/2013.
Experience with the application of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 has proven that certain provisions relating to the ecological focus area types need to be more detailed as regards the requirement of ‘no production’ including the rules on cutting and grazing with a view to meeting the objective of biodiversity and to ensuring consistency with other instruments of the common agricultural policy.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba zlasti z olajševanjem opraševanja spodbujati ukrepe kmetov za zaščito in izboljšanje biotske raznovrstnosti, ki so namenjeni vzpostavitvi travne ruše in zajeti v kmetijsko-okoljsko-podnebno obveznost, s čimer bi se čim bolj povečal ugoden vpliv na okolje.
In particular, as regards the ‘no agricultural production’ requirement applicable to the ecological focus area types referred to in Article 45(2), (4)(e), (5) and (7) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014, it should be clarified that production should be understood as agricultural activity in the meaning of Article 4(1)(c)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, and not in the broader sense of Article 4(1)(c)(ii) and (iii) of the same Regulation, and should not affect the rules on minimum soil cover under GAEC 4 as referred to in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.
Tri glavne vrste površin, ki so jih kmetje v prvem letu izvajanja člena 46 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 prijavili kot površine z ekološkim pomenom, so površine, ki so ali so lahko produktivne, in sicer zemljišče v prahi, naknadni posevki ali travna ruša in površine s kmetijskimi rastlinami, ki vežejo dušik, zato je verjetno, da se na površinah z ekološkim pomenom uporabljajo fitofarmacevtska sredstva.
In addition, undertaking actions by farmers, in particular, by facilitating pollination, in order to safeguard and improve biodiversity, aiming at establishing a green soil cover and which are, for instance, covered by an agri-environment-climate commitment, should be incentivised to maximise the environmental benefits.
Zato je ustrezno, da se za zaščito in izboljšanje biotske raznovrstnosti v skladu s cilji „zelene komponente“ prepove uporaba fitofarmacevtskih sredstev na površinah z ekološkim pomenom, ki so ali so lahko produktivna, in sicer na zemljišču v prahi, pasovih upravičenih hektarov ob gozdu s proizvodnjo, naknadnih posevkih ali travnih rušah ter površinah s kmetijskimi rastlinami, ki vežejo dušik.
Given that the three main types of areas declared by farmers as ecological focus areas in the first year of implementation of Article 46 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 are areas which are, or may be, productive, namely land lying fallow, catch crops or green cover and nitrogen-fixing crops, plant production products are likely to be used in ecological focus areas.
Če naknadni posevki ali travna ruša nastanejo s podsevki trave ali stročnic med glavno kmetijsko rastlino, bi morala taka prepoved veljati od žetve glavne kmetijske rastline, da bi se zaradi sorazmernosti preprečile posledice za upravljanje glavne kmetijske rastline.
Therefore, in order to safeguard and improve biodiversity in line with the objectives of ‘greening’, it is appropriate to ban the use of plant protection products on the following ecological focus areas which are or may be productive: land lying fallow, strips of eligible hectares along forest edges with production, catch crops or green cover and nitrogen-fixing crops.
Da se zagotovi usklajenost prepovedi z običajnimi kmetijskimi praksami in pravna varnost ter da kmetje in nacionalne uprave ne bi imeli upravnih težav, bi bilo treba določiti, da bi se morala prepoved pri podsevkih uporabljati vsaj najkrajše obdobje, ki je enako najkrajšemu obdobju, v katerem je treba vzdrževati površine pod naknadnimi posevki ali travno rušo, če nastanejo s setvijo mešanice vrst kmetijskih rastlin, ali do setve naslednje glavne kmetijske rastline.
Where catch crops or green cover is established by under-sowing grass or leguminous crops in the main crop, in order to avoid, for proportionality reasons, consequences for the management of the main crop, such a ban should apply from the moment of the harvesting of the main crop.
Člen 49 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014 določa pravila, v skladu s katerimi imajo pravne osebe dostop do plačila za mlade kmete iz člena 50(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013.
In order to ensure consistency of the ban with the usual agronomic practices, ensure legal certainty and avoid administrative difficulties for farmers and national administrations it should be specified that the ban for under-sowing should apply for at least a minimum period, equal to the minimum period during which areas under catch crops or green cover have to be in place when established by sowing a mixture of crop species, or until the sowing of the next main crop.
Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih pri uporabi člena 49(3) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 639/2014, bi bilo treba dodatno pojasniti razlago zahteve iz točke (b) člena 50(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 glede obdobja, ko mora mladi kmet, ki ima učinkovit in dolgoročen nadzor nad pravno osebo, izpolnjevati zahtevo v zvezi s starostno mejo.
Article 49 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 lays down the rules under which legal persons have access to the payment for young farmers provided for in Article 50(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013.
Zlasti bi bilo treba pojasniti, da mladi kmet ne sme biti starejši od 40 let v letu prve predložitve vloge v okviru sheme osnovnega plačila ali sheme enotnega plačila na površino, ki jo predloži navedena pravna oseba, nad katero ima nadzor mladi kmet.