natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To ensure legal certainty and equal treatment of all Member States, it is essential to clarify the criteria for determining deficiencies in the effective functioning of the management and control systems, define the main types of such deficiencies and set out the criteria for determining the level of financial correction.
Za zagotovitev pravne varnosti in enakega obravnavanja vseh držav članic je bistveno pojasniti merila za ugotavljanje pomanjkljivosti pri učinkovitem delovanju sistemov upravljanja in nadzora, opredeliti glavne vrste takšnih pomanjkljivosti in določiti merila za določitev stopnje finančnega popravka.
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/378 should therefore be amended.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/378 bi bilo zato treba spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the ‘Asylum, Migration and Integration and Internal Security Funds’ Committee,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za sklada za azil, migracije in vključevanje ter za notranjo varnost –
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/378 is amended as follow:
Izvedbena uredba (EU) 2015/378 se spremeni:
Where the amount accepted by the Commission in the decision on the clearance of annual accounts for financial year N is lower than the annual pre-financing amount for financial year N, the latter amount shall be cleared against the former.
Kadar je znesek, ki ga je Komisija sprejela v sklepu o potrditvi letnih obračunov za proračunsko leto N, nižji od letnega zneska predhodnega financiranja za proračunsko leto N, se drugi znesek obračuna s prvim.
Any outstanding pre-financing amount shall be cleared in the course of subsequent clearance exercises.
Vsakršen preostali znesek predhodnega financiranja se obračuna v okviru poznejših potrditev obračunov.
The first subparagraph shall apply also in cases where a Member State submits annual accounts reporting zero payment.’;
Prvi pododstavek se uporablja tudi v primerih, ko država članica predloži letne zaključne račune, v katerih poroča o ničelnih plačilih.“;
Criteria for determining deficiencies in the effective functioning of the management and control system
Merila za ugotavljanje pomanjkljivosti pri učinkovitem delovanju sistema upravljanja in nadzora
The Commission shall base its assessment of the effective functioning of the management and control system on the results of all available audits carried out by the Member States, the Commission services and the Court of Auditors, the results of investigations carried out by European Anti-Fraud Office or any other information on compliance with the designation criteria referred to in Article 2(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1042/2014.
Komisijina ocena učinkovitega delovanja sistema upravljanja in nadzora temelji na rezultatih vseh razpoložljivih revizij, ki jih izvajajo države članice, službe Komisije in Računsko sodišče, rezultatih preiskav, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam, ali drugih informacijah o skladnosti z merili za imenovanje iz člena 2(1) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1042/2014.
The Commission's assessment shall cover the internal control environment of the national programme, the management and control activities of the Responsible Authority, and the control and audit activities of the Audit Authority and shall be based on verification of compliance with the key requirements set out in Table 1 of the Annex.
Komisijina ocena zajema notranji nadzor nacionalnega programa, dejavnosti upravljanja in nadzora, ki jih izvaja odgovorni organ, in nadzorne in revizijske dejavnosti revizijskega organa ter temelji na preverjanju skladnosti s ključnimi zahtevami iz tabele 1 v Prilogi.
Compliance with the key requirements referred to in paragraph 1 according to the categories set out in Table 2 of the Annex shall be used to assess the effective functioning of each competent authority and to reach an overall conclusion on the management and control system.
Skladnost s ključnimi zahtevami iz odstavka 1 na podlagi kategorij iz tabele 2 v Prilogi se uporabi za oceno učinkovitega delovanja vsakega pristojnega organa in za sprejetje splošne ugotovitve o sistemu upravljanja in nadzora.
Any mitigating or aggravating factors shall be taken into account in the overall conclusion on the management and control system.
Pri splošni ugotovitvi o sistemu upravljanja in nadzora se upoštevajo morebitni olajševalni ali oteževalni dejavniki.
Wherever it is assessed that any of the key requirements 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, 12 or 14 in Table 1 of the Annex, or two or more of the other key requirements in that Table fall into categories 3 or 4 set out in Table 2 of the Annex, it shall be considered as a type of serious deficiency in the effective functioning of the management and control system.
Vrste resnih pomanjkljivosti pri učinkovitem delovanju sistema upravljanja in nadzora so primeri, v katerih se za katero koli od ključnih zahtev iz točk 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, 12 ali 14 tabele 1 v Prilogi ali za dve ali več drugih ključnih zahtev iz navedene tabele oceni, da spadajo v kategorijo 3 ali 4 iz tabele 2 v Prilogi.
Criteria for applying and determining the level of financial corrections
Merila za uporabo in določitev stopnje finančnih popravkov
The Commission shall apply financial corrections where it identifies one or more individual or systemic irregularities or one or more deficiencies in the effective functioning of the management and control system (‘system deficiencies’).
Kadar Komisija ugotovi eno ali več posameznih ali sistemskih nepravilnosti ali eno ali več pomanjkljivosti pri učinkovitem delovanju sistema upravljanja in nadzora (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistemske pomanjkljivosti), uporabi finančne popravke.
For the purpose of this Regulation, an irregularity means any infringement of Union or national law or any infringement of national rules resulting from an act or omission by a beneficiary or beneficiaries which has, or would have, the effect of prejudicing the general budget of the European Union by charging to it an unjustified item of expenditure.
V tej uredbi nepravilnost pomeni vsako kršitev prava Unije ali nacionalnega prava oziroma vsako kršitev nacionalnih predpisov z dejanjem ali opustitvijo dejanja s strani upravičenca ali upravičencev, ki zaradi neupravičene postavke odhodkov škoduje ali bi lahko škodovala splošnemu proračunu Evropske unije.
The amount of the financial correction shall be determined on a case-by-case basis wherever possible and shall be equal to the exact amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the general budget of the Union.
Znesek finančnega popravka se, kadar je mogoče, določi za vsak primer posebej in je enak točnemu znesku odhodka, ki je bil napačno zaračunan splošnemu proračunu Unije.
Where the Commission identifies irregularities in a representative sample of expenditure in all or part of a national programme, but it is not cost-effective to verify the regularity of the other expenditure, the correction may be determined by extrapolating the results of the examination of the sample to the rest of the population from which it was drawn.
Kadar Komisija ugotovi nepravilnosti v reprezentativnem vzorcu odhodkov v celotnem nacionalnem programu ali njegovem delu, preverjanje pravilnosti drugih odhodkov pa ne bi bilo stroškovno učinkovito, se lahko popravek določi z ekstrapolacijo rezultatov pregleda vzorca na preostalo populacijo, iz katere je bil izbran vzorec.
Where the Commission identifies systemic irregularities or system deficiencies but where it is not possible, even by extrapolation, to quantify the correction precisely, a flat-rate financial correction shall be applied to the expenditure declared for the part of the system affected in accordance with the indicative criteria and scales set out in paragraphs 2 and 3.
Kadar Komisija ugotovi sistemske nepravilnosti ali sistemske pomanjkljivosti, popravka pa niti z ekstrapolacijo ni mogoče natančno količinsko opredeliti, se za odhodke, ki so prijavljeni za del prizadetega sistema v skladu z okvirnimi merili in lestvicami iz odstavkov 2 in 3, uporabi pavšalni finančni popravek.
Flat-rate corrections may also be applied in respect of individual irregularities.
Pavšalni popravki se lahko uporabijo tudi v zvezi s posameznimi nepravilnostmi.
The level of flat-rate correction shall be determined taking into account the following factors:
Stopnja pavšalnega popravka se določi ob upoštevanju naslednjih dejavnikov:
the degree of seriousness of the irregularity or of the system deficiency in relation to the overall system or part of it, or to the types of expenditure declared;
stopnje resnosti nepravilnosti ali sistemske pomanjkljivosti glede na celoten sistem ali njegov del ali glede na vrste prijavljenih odhodkov;
the degree of risk of loss to which the Union budget was exposed as a result of the irregularity or system deficiency;
stopnje tveganja izgube, ki ji je proračun EU izpostavljen zaradi nepravilnosti ali sistemske pomanjkljivosti;
the vulnerability of the expenditure to fraud due to the irregularity or system deficiency;
ranljivosti odhodkov v zvezi z goljufijami zaradi nepravilnosti ali sistemske pomanjkljivosti;
any mitigating or aggravating factors.
morebitnih olajševalnih ali oteževalnih dejavnikov.
The level of correction shall be determined as follows:
Stopnja popravka se določi na naslednji način:
where the irregularity or irregularities or the system deficiency or deficiencies is/are so fundamental, frequent or widespread that it/they represent(s) a complete failure of the system that puts at risk the legality and regularity of all the expenditure concerned, a flat rate of 100 % shall be applied;
kadar so nepravilnosti ali sistemske pomanjkljivosti tako temeljne, pogoste ali razširjene, da pomenijo popolno odpoved sistema ter ogrožajo zakonitost in pravilnost vseh zadevnih odhodkov, se uporabi pavšalna stopnja 100 %;
where the irregularity or irregularities or the system deficiency or deficiencies is/are so frequent and widespread that it/they represent(s) an extremely serious failure of the system that puts at risk the legality and regularity of a very high proportion of the expenditure concerned, a flat rate of 25 % shall be applied;
kadar so nepravilnosti ali sistemske pomanjkljivosti tako pogoste in razširjene, da pomenijo zelo resno odpoved sistema ter ogrožajo zakonitost in pravilnost zelo velikega deleža zadevnih odhodkov, se uporabi pavšalna stopnja 25 %;
where the irregularity or irregularities or the system deficiency or deficiencies is/are due to the system functioning partially, poorly or infrequently so as to put at risk the legality and regularity of a high proportion of the expenditure concerned, a flat rate of 10 % shall be applied;
kadar do nepravilnosti ali sistemskih pomanjkljivosti pride zaradi nepopolnega, nepravilnega ali nerednega delovanja sistema, ki ogroža zakonitost in pravilnost velikega deleža zadevnih odhodkov, se uporabi pavšalna stopnja 10 %;
where the irregularity or irregularities or the system deficiency or deficiencies is/are due to the system functioning inconsistently so as to put at risk the legality and regularity of a significant proportion of the expenditure concerned, a flat rate of 5 % shall be applied.
kadar do nepravilnosti ali sistemskih pomanjkljivosti pride zaradi nedoslednega delovanja sistema, ki ogroža zakonitost in pravilnost znatnega deleža zadevnih odhodkov, se uporabi pavšalna stopnja 5 %;
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, the rate may be reduced to 2 % where the nature and gravity of the irregularity or system deficiency are not considered to justify a 5 % correction rate.
če narava in resnost nepravilnosti ali sistemske pomanjkljivosti ne upravičujeta 5-odstotne stopnje popravka, se lahko stopnja v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti zniža na 2 %.
Where, due to a competent authority's failure to take adequate corrective measures following the application of a financial correction in a financial year, the same irregularity or irregularities or deficiency or deficiencies is/are identified in a subsequent financial year, the rate of flat rate correction may, due to the persistence of the irregularity or irregularities or deficiency or deficiencies, be raised to a level not exceeding the next level in the scale set out in paragraph 3.
Če po uporabi finančnega popravka v proračunskem letu pristojni organ ne sprejme ustreznih popravnih ukrepov in se v naslednjem proračunskem letu ugotovijo iste nepravilnosti ali pomanjkljivosti, se lahko stopnja pavšalnega popravka zaradi trajanja nepravilnosti ali pomanjkljivosti poviša na stopnjo, ki ne presega naslednje stopnje na lestvici iz odstavka 3.
a new annex is added as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
doda se nova priloga, kot je določena v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/378 of 2 March 2015 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the implementation of the annual clearance of accounts procedure and the implementation of the conformity clearance (OJ L 64, 7.3.2015, p. 30).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/378 z dne 2. marca 2015 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 514/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z izvajanjem postopka za letno potrditev obračuna in postopka za potrditev skladnosti (UL L 64, 7.3.2015, str. 30).
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1042/2014 of 25 July 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 with regard to the designation and management and control responsibilities of Responsible Authorities and with regard to status and obligations of Audit Authorities (OJ L 289, 3.10.2014, p. 3).’;
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1042/2014 z dne 25. julija 2014 o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 514/2014 v zvezi z imenovanjem odgovornih organov, njihovimi odgovornostmi glede upravljanja in nadzora ter statusom in obveznostmi revizijskih organov (UL L 289, 3.10.2014, str. 3).“;
Key requirements of the management and control systems and their classification with regard to their effective functioning
Ključne zahteve za sisteme upravljanja in nadzora ter njihova klasifikacija glede na njihovo učinkovito delovanje
(referred to in Article 3a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/378)
(iz člena 3a Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/378)
Key requirements
Ključne zahteve
Key requirements of the management and control systems
Ključne zahteve za sisteme upravljanja in nadzora
Bodies/authorities concerned
Zadevni organi
Adequate description and separation of functions and adequate systems for reporting and monitoring where the Responsible Authority entrusts execution of tasks to another body
Ustrezen opis in ločenost funkcij ter ustrezni sistemi poročanja in spremljanja, če odgovorni organ zaupa izvajanje nalog drugemu organu
Responsible Authority/Delegated Authority
odgovorni/pooblaščeni organ
Internal environment
notranje okolje
Appropriate selection of projects
Ustrezen izbor projektov
Control activities
dejavnosti nadzora
Adequate information to beneficiaries, potential beneficiaries and the public
Ustrezno obveščanje upravičencev, morebitnih upravičencev in javnosti
Internal information and communication
notranje obveščanje in sporočanje
Adequate controls
Ustrezne kontrole
Effective systems and procedures to ensure that all the documents regarding expenditure and controls are held to ensure an adequate audit trail
Učinkoviti sistemi in postopki, ki zagotavljajo, da se hranijo vsi dokumenti v zvezi z odhodki in kontrolami ter se tako omogoči ustrezna revizijska sled
Reliable computerised systems for accounting, for the storage and transmission of financial data and data on indicators, for monitoring and for reporting
Zanesljivi računalniški sistemi za računovodstvo, shranjevanje in pošiljanje finančnih podatkov in podatkov o kazalnikih za namene spremljanja in poročanja
Control activities/Internal information and communication
dejavnosti nadzora / notranje obveščanje in sporočanje
Effective implementation of procedures for the prevention, detection and correction of irregularities including proportionate anti-fraud measures
Učinkovito izvajanje postopkov za preprečevanje, odkrivanje in odpravo nepravilnosti, vključno s sorazmernimi ukrepi proti goljufijam
Appropriate procedures for drawing up the annual accounts, the management declaration and the annual summary of final audit reports and of controls carried out
Ustrezni postopki za pripravo letnih zaključnih računov, izjave o upravljanju ter letnega povzetka končnih revizijskih poročil in izvedenih kontrol
Appropriate and complete account of amounts recoverable, recovered and cancelled
Primerna in popolna evidenca izterljivih, izterjanih in preklicanih zneskov
Adequate description and separation of functions, functional independence from the Responsible Authority and adequate systems for ensuring that any other body that carries out audits has the necessary functional independence and takes accounts of internationally accepted audit standards
Ustrezen opis in ločenost funkcij, funkcionalna neodvisnost od odgovornega organa in ustrezni sistemi za zagotovitev, da ima vsak drug organ, ki izvaja revizije, potrebno funkcionalno neodvisnost in upošteva mednarodno priznane revizijske standarde
Audit Authority
revizijski organ
Adequate system audits
Ustrezne revizije sistemov
Adequate audits of expenditure
Ustrezne revizije odhodkov
Adequate audits of accounts
Ustrezne revizije računovodskih izkazov
Adequate procedures for providing reliable audit opinions and audit reports
Ustrezni postopki za izdajo zanesljivih revizijskih mnenj in pripravo revizijskih poročil
Classification of key requirements for the management and control systems with regard to their functioning
Klasifikacija ključnih zahtev za sisteme upravljanja in nadzora glede na njihovo delovanje
Works well.
Dobro deluje.
No, or only minor improvement(s) needed
Izboljšave niso potrebne ali pa so potrebne le manjše izboljšave.
Works.
Deluje.
Some improvement(s) needed
Potrebne so določene izboljšave.
Works partially.
Delno deluje.
Substantial improvements needed
Potrebne so znatne izboljšave.
Essentially does not work
Dejansko ne deluje.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/647
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/647
adopting exceptional support measures for the pigmeat market in Poland in respect of certain sows and other pigs slaughtered from 1 August to 30 November 2016
o sprejetju izrednih ukrepov za podporo trgu prašičjega mesa na Poljskem v zvezi z nekaterimi svinjami in drugimi prašiči, zaklanimi od 1. avgusta do 30. novembra 2016
Between 1 August and 30 September 2016 a series of outbreaks of African swine fever related to the human factor were confirmed and notified to the Commission by Poland.
Med 1. avgustom in 30. septembrom 2016 je Poljska potrdila več izbruhov afriške prašičje kuge v zvezi s človeškim dejavnikom in o njih uradno obvestila Komisijo.
The epidemic was particularly severe because the virus circulation was confirmed at several holdings with domestic pigs in a relatively wide geographic area.
Epidemija je bila posebno huda, ker je bilo kroženja virusa potrjeno na več kmetijskih gospodarstvih z domačimi prašiči na sorazmerno velikem geografskem območju.
Poland immediately took the necessary animal health measures in accordance with Council Directive 2002/60/EC [2], which lays down the minimum measures to be applied within the Union for the control of African swine fever.
Poljska je takoj sprejela potrebne ukrepe za zdravje živali v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2002/60/ES [2], ki določa minimalne ukrepe, ki jih je treba uporabljati v Uniji za nadzor nad afriško prašičjo kugo.
In particular, Poland took control, monitoring and preventive measures in accordance with Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU [3] as amended by Commission Implementing Decisions (EU) 2016/1236 [4], (EU) 2016/1372 [5], (EU) 2016/1405 [6] and (EU) 2016/1900 [7] and established protection and surveillance zones in accordance with Commission Implementing Decisions (EU) 2016/1367 [8] and (EU) 2016/1406 [9].
Poljska je zlasti sprejela nadzorne ukrepe, ukrepe spremljanja in preventivne ukrepe v skladu z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2014/709/EU [3], kakor je bil spremenjen z izvedbenimi sklepi Komisije (EU) 2016/1236 [4], (EU) 2016/1372 [5], (EU) 2016/1405 [6] in (EU) 2016/1900 [7], ter vzpostavila okužena in ogrožena območja v skladu z izvedbenima sklepoma Komisije (EU) 2016/1367 [8] in (EU) 2016/1406 [9].
Furthermore, with a view to preventing the spread of African swine fever and in order to prevent any further disturbance of trade within Poland and abroad, Poland implemented some additional preventive measures in the areas concerned.
Poleg tega je za preprečitev širjenja afriške prašičje kuge in za preprečitev morebitnih nadaljnjih motenj v trgovini na Poljskem in v drugih državah Poljska izvedla dodatne preventivne ukrepe na navedenih območjih.
In particular, the movement and transport of pigs has been subject to stricter surveillance measures and the marketing of pigs has been subject to restrictions within the domestic market beyond those established in Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Zlasti za premike in prevoz prašičev veljajo strožji nadzorni ukrepi, trženje prašičev pa je bilo predmet omejitev na domačem trgu poleg tistih, ki so določene v Izvedbenem sklepu 2014/709/EU.
In applying those measures, Poland managed to prevent the further spread of the disease.
Poljska je z uporabo navedenih ukrepov uspela preprečiti nadaljnje širjenje bolezni.
The Union and national health measures were applied until 18 November 2016 in all relevant holdings.
Ukrepi na področju zdravstvenega varstva na ravni Unije in nacionalni ravni so se uporabljali do 18. novembra 2016 na vseh zadevnih kmetijskih gospodarstvih.
Poland informed the Commission that those measures affected a very large number of pig holdings and that the producers concerned suffered income losses not eligible for Union financial contribution under Regulation (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10].
Poljska je Komisijo obvestila, da so navedeni ukrepi vplivali na veliko število gospodarstev s prašiči in da so zadevni proizvajalci utrpeli izgube dohodka, za katere niso upravičeni do finančnega prispevka Unije v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 652/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10].
On 4 November 2016, the Commission received a formal request from Poland for part-financing of certain exceptional support measures pursuant to Article 220(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Komisija je 4. novembra 2016 prejela uradni zahtevek Poljske za delno financiranje nekaterih izrednih podpornih ukrepov v skladu s členom 220(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013.
For the pigs reared in the areas concerned, the aid should be granted only as regards animals slaughtered.
Za prašiče, vzrejene na zadevnih območjih, bi morala biti pomoč dodeljena le za zaklane živali.
The aid amount to be paid for the animals slaughtered should be expressed as an amount per kilogram for a limited number of animals.
Znesek pomoči, ki se izplača za zaklane živali, bi moral biti izražen kot znesek na kilogram za omejeno število živali.
The aid amount should be set taking into account prices as collected by Poland as well as information from invoices as regards the prices actually paid to producers from areas under animal health measures.
Znesek pomoči bi bilo treba določiti ob upoštevanju cen, kot jih je zbrala Poljska, pa tudi informacij z računov glede cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale proizvajalcem na območjih, za katera veljajo ukrepi za zdravje živali.
In view of the information provided by Poland, the maximum number of animals eligible for financing should be fixed on the basis of the request received from that Member State.
Ob upoštevanju informacij, ki jih je predložila Poljska, bi moralo biti največje število živali, upravičenih do financiranja, določeno na podlagi zahtevka, prejetega od navedene države članice.