natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If such a consensus cannot be reached, decisions should be taken by voting.
Sestava stalnega senata bi se morala določiti v skladu s poslovnikom EJT, kjer bi se med drugim moralo dovoliti, da je evropski tožilec lahko član več stalnih senatov, če je to ustrezno – in kolikor je to mogoče – zaradi zagotavljanja enakomerne delovne obremenitve posameznih evropskih tožilcev.
The Permanent Chambers should monitor and direct investigations and ensure the coherence of the activities of the EPPO.
Stalnim senatom bi moral predsedovati evropski glavni tožilec, eden od namestnikov evropskega glavnega tožilca ali evropski tožilec v skladu z načeli, določenimi v poslovniku EJT.
The composition of Permanent Chambers should be determined in accordance with the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO, which should allow, among other things, for a European Prosecutor to be a member of more than one Permanent Chamber where this is appropriate to ensure, to the extent possible, an even workload between individual European Prosecutors.
Dodeljevanje zadev med stalnimi senati bi moralo temeljiti na sistemu naključnega razdeljevanja, da se v največji možni meri zagotovi enakomerna delovna obremenitev.
Permanent Chambers should be chaired by the European Chief Prosecutor, one of the deputy European Chief Prosecutors or a European Prosecutor, in accordance with principles laid down in the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO.
Treba bi bilo omogočiti odstopanja od tega načela na podlagi odločitve evropskega glavnega tožilca, da se zagotovi pravilno in učinkovito delovanje EJT.
The allocation of cases between the Permanent Chambers should be based on a system of a random distribution so as to ensure, to the extent possible, an equal division of workload.
V kolegij bi bilo treba imenovati evropskega tožilca iz vsake države članice.
Deviations from this principle should be possible to ensure the proper and efficient functioning of the EPPO on a decision by the European Chief Prosecutor.
Evropski tožilci bi morali načeloma v imenu pristojnega stalnega senata nadzorovati preiskave in pregon, ki jih izvajajo evropski delegirani tožilci v njihovi državi članici izvora.
A European Prosecutor from each Member State should be appointed to the College.
Delovati bi morali kot zveza med glavnim uradom in decentralizirano ravnjo v njihovih državah članicah ter tako lajšati delovanje EJT kot enotnega urada.
The European Prosecutors should in principle supervise, on behalf of the competent Permanent Chamber, the investigations and prosecutions handled by the European Delegated Prosecutors in their Member State of origin.
Nadzorujoči evropski tožilec bi moral tudi preverjati skladnost vseh navodil z nacionalnim pravom in v primeru, če navodila niso skladna, obvestiti stalni senat.
They should act as liaison between the central office and the decentralised level in their Member States, facilitating the functioning of the EPPO as a single office.
Zaradi delovne obremenitve, povezane z velikim številom preiskav in pregona v posamezni državi članici, bi evropski tožilec moral imeti možnost zahtevati, da se nadzor nad nekaterimi preiskavami in pregonom v njegovi državi članici izvora izjemoma lahko dodeli drugim evropskim tožilcem.
The supervising European Prosecutor should also check any instruction’s compliance with national law and inform the Permanent Chamber if the instructions do not do so.
Odločitev bi moral sprejeti evropski glavni tožilec s soglasjem evropskega tožilca, ki bi prevzel zadevne zadeve.
For reasons of workload linked to the high number of investigations and prosecutions in a given Member State, a European Prosecutor should be able to request that, exceptionally, the supervision of certain investigations and prosecutions in his/her Member State of origin may be assigned to other European Prosecutors.
Merila za takšne odločitve bi morala biti določena v poslovniku EJT in vključevati zahtevo, da evropski tožilec, ki bo prevzel zadeve, zadostno pozna jezik in pravni sistem zadevne države članice.
The decision should be taken by the European Chief Prosecutor with the agreement of the European Prosecutor who would take over the cases concerned.
Preiskave EJT bi praviloma morali izvajati evropski delegirani tožilci v državah članicah.
The criteria for such decisions should be laid down in the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO, and should include the requirement that the European Prosecutor taking over the cases has sufficient knowledge of the language and legal system of the Member State concerned.
Izvajati bi jih morali v skladu s to uredbo in – glede zadev, ki jih ta uredba ne ureja – v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
The investigations of the EPPO should as a rule be carried out by European Delegated Prosecutors in the Member States.
Evropski delegirani tožilci bi morali svoje naloge opravljati pod nadzorom nadzorujočega evropskega tožilca ter pod vodstvom in navodili pristojnega stalnega senata.
They should do so in accordance with this Regulation and, as regards matters not covered by this Regulation, in accordance with national law.
Če nacionalno pravo države članice določa notranji nadzor nekaterih aktov v okviru strukture nacionalnega tožilstva, bi moralo biti preverjanje takih odločitev, ki jih sprejme evropski delegirani tožilec, zajeto v okvir nadzornih pooblastil nadzorujočega evropskega tožilca v skladu s poslovnikom EJT.
European Delegated Prosecutors should carry out their tasks under the supervision of the supervising European Prosecutor and under the direction and instruction of the competent Permanent Chamber.
V takih primerih države članice ne bi smele biti obvezane, da zagotovijo nadzor pred nacionalnimi sodišči, brez poseganja v člen 19 PEU in člen 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina).
Where the national law of a Member State provides for the internal review of certain acts within the structure of the national prosecutor’s office, the review of such decisions taken by the European Delegated Prosecutor should fall under the supervision powers of the supervising European Prosecutor in accordance with the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO.
Funkcije tožilca na pristojnih sodiščih veljajo do zaključka postopka, torej do dokončne ugotovitve, ali je osumljena ali obdolžena oseba storila kaznivo dejanje, in če je ustrezno, tudi odmere sankcije in rešitve morebitnih pravnih postopkov ali pravnih sredstev, ki so na voljo, dokler navedena odločitev ne postane dokončna.
In such cases, Member States should not be obliged to provide for review by national courts, without prejudice to Article 19 TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’).
Evropski delegirani tožilci bi morali biti sestavni del EJT in v tej funkciji pri preiskovanju in pregonu kaznivih dejanj, ki sodijo v pristojnost EJT, delovati izključno v imenu in za račun EJT na ozemlju svoje države članice.
The functions of prosecutor in competent courts apply until the conclusion of the proceedings, which is understood to mean the final determination of the question whether the suspect or accused person has committed the offence, including, where applicable, sentencing and the resolution of any legal action or remedies available until that decision has become definitive.
To bi pomenilo, da se jim na podlagi te uredbe podeli funkcionalno in pravno neodvisen status, ki se razlikuje od katerega koli statusa na podlagi nacionalnega prava.
The European Delegated Prosecutors should be an integral part of the EPPO and as such, when investigating and prosecuting offences within the competence of the EPPO, they should act exclusively on behalf and in the name of the EPPO on the territory of their respective Member State.
Evropski delegirani tožilci bi morali biti ne glede na svoj poseben status na podlagi te uredbe v času svojega mandata tudi člani tožilstva v svoji državi članici, in sicer tožilci ali člani sodstva, zadevna država članica pa bi jim morala podeliti vsaj enaka pooblastila kot nacionalnim tožilcem.
This should entail granting them under this Regulation a functionally and legally independent status which is different from any status under national law.
Evropski delegirani tožilci bi morali obvezno upoštevati navodila stalnih senatov in evropskih tožilcev.
Notwithstanding their special status under this Regulation, the European Delegated Prosecutors should, during their term of office, also be members of the prosecution service of their Member State, namely a prosecutor or member of the judiciary, and should be granted by their Member State at least the same powers as national prosecutors.
Če evropski delegirani tožilec meni, da bi moral zaradi navodila ravnati v nasprotju z nacionalnim pravom, bi moral zaprositi za pregled tega navodila s strani evropskega glavnega tožilca.
The European Delegated Prosecutors should be bound to follow instructions coming from the Permanent Chambers and the European Prosecutors.
Evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, bi moral nadzorujočemu evropskemu tožilcu in pristojnemu stalnemu senatu poročati o vseh pomembnih dogodkih v zadevi, na primer o izvajanju preiskovalnih ukrepov ali spremembah seznama osumljenih oseb.
Where a European Delegated Prosecutor considers that an instruction would require him/her to undertake any measure that would not be in compliance with national law, he/she should ask for a review of that instruction by the European Chief Prosecutor.
Zaradi zagotavljanja skupne politike o preiskavah in pregonu bi morali stalni senati izvrševati svoje pristojnosti glede odločanja v določenih fazah postopka v okviru EJT.
The European Delegated Prosecutor handling a case should report any significant developments in a case, such as the performance of investigative measures or changes to the list of suspected persons, to the supervising European Prosecutor and to the competent Permanent Chamber.
Odločitve bi morali sprejemati na podlagi osnutkov odločitev, ki jih predlaga evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo.
The Permanent Chambers should exercise their decision-making power at specific steps of the proceedings of the EPPO with a view to ensuring a common investigation and prosecution policy.
Vendar bi lahko stalni senat v izjemnih primerih sprejel odločitev brez osnutka odločitve, ki ga predloži evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo.
They should adopt decisions on the basis of a draft decision proposed by the handling European Delegated Prosecutor.
V takšnih primerih lahko tak osnutek odločitve predloži evropski tožilec, ki zadevo nadzoruje.
However, in exceptional cases, a Permanent Chamber should be able to adopt a decision without a draft decision of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor.
Stalnemu senatu bi moralo biti omogočeno, da svoje pooblastilo za odločanje prenese na nadzorujočega evropskega tožilca v specifičnih primerih, ko kaznivo dejanje ni hudo ali postopek ni zapleten.
In such cases, the European Prosecutor supervising the case may present such a draft decision.
Pri določanju teže kaznivega dejanja bi bilo treba upoštevati njegove posledice na ravni Unije.
A Permanent Chamber should be able to delegate its decision-making power to the supervising European Prosecutor in specific cases where an offence is not serious or the proceedings are not complex.
V poslovniku EJT bi bilo treba določiti mehanizem za nadomeščanja med evropskimi tožilci.
When assessing the degree of seriousness of an offence, account should be taken of its repercussions at Union level.
Mehanizem za nadomeščanja bi morali uporabljati v primerih, ko evropski tožilec za kratek čas ne more izpolnjevati svojih dolžnosti, na primer zaradi odsotnosti.
A substitution mechanism between European Prosecutors should be provided for in the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba evropskega tožilca nadomestiti z enim od evropskih delegiranih tožilcev iz njegove države članice, če evropski tožilec odstopi s položaja, je z njega razrešen ali ga zapusti iz kakršnega koli drugega razloga ali, na primer v primeru daljše bolezni.
The substitution mechanism should be used in cases where a European Prosecutor is briefly unable to fulfil his/her duties, for example, due to absence.
Nadomeščanja bi bilo treba omejiti na največ tri mesece.
In addition, a European Prosecutor should be substituted by one of the European Delegated Prosecutors of his/her Member State when the European Prosecutor resigns, is dismissed or leaves his/her position for any other reason or in cases, for example, of prolonged illness.
Kolegij bi moral imeti možnosti, da ta rok lahko podaljša, če meni, da je to potrebno, ob upoštevanju delovne obremenitve EJT in trajanja odsotnosti, in sicer do zamenjave ali vrnitve evropskega tožilca.
The substitution should be limited to a period of up to 3 months.
Evropski delegirani tožilec, ki nadomešča evropskega tožilca, v obdobju nadomeščanja ne bi smel več biti odgovoren za preiskave in pregon, ki jih izvaja v funkciji evropskega delegiranega tožilca ali nacionalnega tožilca.
The possibility to prolong this time limit should be left to the discretion of the College, where deemed to be necessary, taking into account the workload of the EPPO and the duration of the absence, pending replacement or return of the European Prosecutor.
V zvezi s postopki EJT, ki jih je vodil evropski delegirani tožilec, ki nadomešča evropskega tožilca, bi se morala uporabljati pravila EJT o prerazporeditvi.
The European Delegated Prosecutor substituting the European Prosecutor should, for the period of the substitution, no longer be in charge of investigations and prosecutions handled by him/her as a European Delegated Prosecutor or as national prosecutor.
Postopek za imenovanje evropskega glavnega tožilca in evropskih tožilcev bi moral zagotavljati njihovo neodvisnost.
With regard to proceedings of the EPPO which were handled by the European Delegated Prosecutor substituting a European Prosecutor, the EPPO’s rules on reallocation should apply.
Njihova legitimnost bi morala izhajati iz institucij Unije, vključenih v postopek imenovanja.
The procedure for the appointment of the European Chief Prosecutor and the European Prosecutors should guarantee their independence.
Namestnike evropskega glavnega tožilca bi moral izmed svojih članov imenovati kolegij.
Their legitimacy should be drawn from the institutions of the Union involved in the appointment procedure.
Izbirna komisija bi morala pripraviti ožji seznam kandidatov za mesto evropskega glavnega tožilca.
The Deputies to the European Chief Prosecutor should be appointed by the College from among its members.
Pooblastilo za določanje pravil delovanja te komisije in za imenovanje njenih članov bi bilo treba prenesti na Svet, na podlagi predloga Komisije.
A selection panel should establish a short list of candidates for the position of European Chief Prosecutor.
Takšno izvedbeno pooblastilo bi bilo v skladu s posebnimi pooblastili, prenesenimi na Svet na podlagi člena 86 PDEU, in odraža posebno naravo EJT, ki bo še naprej trdno vpeto v nacionalne pravne strukture, obenem pa bo organ Unije.
The power to establish the panel’s operating rules and to appoint its members should be conferred on the Council, based on a proposal from the Commission.
EJT bo ukrepalo v postopkih, kjer bo večina drugih akterjev nacionalnih, na primer sodišča, policija in drugi organi kazenskega pregona, zato ima Svet poseben interes, da je čim bolj udeležen pri postopku imenovanja.
Such an implementing power would mirror the specific powers conferred on the Council under Article 86 TFEU, and reflects the specific nature of the EPPO, which will remain firmly embedded in national legal structures while at the same time being a Union body.
Prenos navedenih pooblastil na Svet tudi ustrezno upošteva potencialno občutljivo naravo pristojnosti za odločanje, ki neposredno vplivajo na nacionalne strukture sodišč in tožilstva.
The EPPO will be acting in proceedings where most other actors will be national, such as courts, police and other law enforcement authorities, and therefore the Council has a specific interest in being closely involved in the appointment procedure.
Evropski parlament in Svet bi morala enega izmed kandidatov na seznamu v medsebojnem soglasju imenovati za glavnega tožilca.
Conferring those powers on the Council also adequately takes into account the potential sensitive nature of any decision-making powers with direct implications for the national judicial and prosecution structures.
Vsaka država članica bi morala predlagati tri kandidate za mesta evropskih tožilcev, ki jih izbere in imenuje Svet.
The European Parliament and the Council should appoint, by common accord, one of the shortlisted candidates as Chief Prosecutor.
Da se zagotavlja kontinuiteta dela kolegija, bi morali vsaka tri leta delno zamenjati tretjino evropskih tožilcev.
Each Member State should nominate three candidates for the position of European Prosecutor to be selected and appointed by the Council.
Na Svet bi bilo treba prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje prehodnih pravil za imenovanje evropskih tožilcev za prvo mandatno obdobje in med njim.
With a view to ensuring the continuity of the work of the College, there should be a partial replacement of one third of the European Prosecutors every 3 years.
Navedeno izvedbeno pooblastilo ustreza pooblastilu Sveta za izbor in imenovanje evropskih tožilcev.
The power to adopt transitional rules for the appointment of European Prosecutors for and during the first mandate period should be conferred on the Council.
To je upravičeno tudi zaradi posebne narave evropskih tožilcev, ki so povezani s svojo državo članico, obenem pa so člani kolegija, ter bolj splošno s posebno naravo EJT, v skladu z isto logiko, na kateri temelji izvedbeno pooblastilo, podeljeno Svetu, za določanje pravil delovanja izbirne komisije in za imenovanje njenih članov.
That implementing power mirrors the power of the Council to select and appoint the European Prosecutors.
Svet bi moral pri odločanju o delni zamenjavi tretjine evropskih tožilcev v njihovem prvem mandatnem obdobju upoštevati geografski razpon držav članic.
This is also justified by the specific nature of the European Prosecutors as being linked to their respective Member States while at the same time being Members of the College and more generally, by the specific nature of the EPPO following the same logic underlying the implementing power conferred on the Council to establish the panel’s operating rules and to appoint its members.
Postopek imenovanja evropskih delegiranih tožilcev bi moral zagotavljati, da so sestavni del EJT ter obenem na operativni ravni še naprej vključeni v njihove nacionalne pravne sisteme ter strukture sodišč in tožilstva.
The Council should take into account the geographical range of the Member States when deciding on the partial replacement of one third of the European Prosecutors during their first mandate period.
Države članice bi morale imenovati kandidate za funkcijo evropskih delegiranih tožilcev, ki jih na predlog evropskega glavnega tožilca imenuje kolegij.
The procedure for the appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors should ensure that they are an integral part of the EPPO while they remain integrated at an operational level in their national legal systems and judicial and prosecution structures.
V vsaki državi članici bi morala biti najmanj dva evropska delegirana tožilca, da se zagotovi pravilno obravnavanje števila zadev EJT.
Member States should nominate candidates for the position of European Delegated Prosecutors, who should be appointed by the College on a proposal by the European Chief Prosecutor.
Evropski glavni tožilec bi moral ob posvetovanju z vsako državo članico odobriti število evropskih delegiranih tožilcev na državo članico, pa tudi funkcionalno in ozemeljsko delitev nalog med njimi.
There should be two or more European Delegated Prosecutors in each Member State to ensure the proper handling of the caseload of the EPPO.
Med takšnimi posvetovanji bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati organizacijo nacionalnih sistemov pregona.
The European Chief Prosecutor should approve the number of European Delegated Prosecutors per Member State, as well as the functional and territorial division of tasks among them, in consultation with each Member State.
Koncept funkcionalne delitve pristojnosti med evropskimi delegiranimi tožilci bi lahko omogočal delitev nalog.
In such consultations, due account should be taken of the organisation of the national prosecution systems.
Skupno število evropskih delegiranih tožilcev v državi članici se lahko spremeni z odobritvijo evropskega glavnega tožilca, ob upoštevanju omejitev letne proračunske vrstice za EJT.
The notion of functional division of competences between European Delegated Prosecutors could allow for a division of tasks.
Kolegij bi moral biti odgovoren za disciplinske postopke v zvezi z evropskimi delegiranimi tožilci, ki delujejo na podlagi te uredbe.
The total number of European Delegated Prosecutors in a Member State may be modified with the approval of the European Chief Prosecutor, subject to the limits of the annual budget line of the EPPO.
Ker evropski delegirani tožilci ostajajo dejavni člani državnega tožilstva ali sodstva v državah članicah in lahko opravljajo tudi funkcije nacionalnih tožilcev, se lahko iz razlogov, nepovezanih s to uredbo, uporabljajo nacionalne disciplinske določbe.
The College should be responsible for disciplinary procedures concerning European Delegated Prosecutors acting under this Regulation.
Vendar pa bi moral biti v takih primerih evropski glavni tožilec obveščen o razrešitvi ali vsakem disciplinskem ukrepu, saj je odgovoren za upravljanje EJT ter da se zavarujeta njegova integriteta in neodvisnost.
Since European Delegated Prosecutors remain active members of the public prosecution or the judiciary of the Member States, and may also exercise functions as national prosecutors, national disciplinary provisions may apply for reasons not connected with this Regulation.
Delo EJT bi bilo treba načeloma izvajati elektronsko.
However, in such cases the European Chief Prosecutor should be informed of the dismissal or of any disciplinary action, given his responsibilities for the management of the EPPO and in order to protect its integrity and independence.
V okviru EJT bi bilo treba vzpostaviti in upravljati lastni sistem vodenja zadev.
The work of the EPPO should, in principle, be carried out in electronic form.
Informacije v sistemu vodenja zadev bi morale vključevati prejete informacije o morebitnih kaznivih dejanjih, ki sodijo v pristojnost EJT, pa tudi informacije iz spisov, tudi če so te že zaprti.
A case management system should be established, owned and managed by the EPPO.
EJT bi moralo pri vzpostavljanju sistema vodenja zadev zagotoviti, da mu sistem omogoča enotno delovanje ter da so spisi, ki jih obravnavajo evropski delegirani tožilci, na voljo glavnemu uradu pri opravljanju nalog odločanja, spremljanja in usmerjanja ter nadzora.
The information in the case management system should include information received about possible offences that fall under the EPPO’s competence, as well as information from the case files, also when those have been closed.
Nacionalni organi bi morali EJT brez odlašanja obvestiti o vsakem ravnanju, ki bi lahko pomenilo kaznivo dejanje v njegovi pristojnosti.
The EPPO should, when establishing the case management system, ensure that the system allows the EPPO to operate as a single office, where the case files administered by European Delegated Prosecutors are available to the Central Office for the exercise of its decision-making, monitoring and direction, and supervision tasks.
V zadevah, ki ne sodijo v njegovo pristojnost, bi moralo EJT pristojne nacionalne organe obvestiti o vseh dejstvih, ki jih ugotovi in bi lahko pomenila kaznivo dejanje, kot so na primer lažna pričanja.
National authorities should inform the EPPO without delay of any conduct that could constitute an offence within the competence of the EPPO.
Institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Unije, pa tudi nacionalni organi bi morali EJT brez odlašanja zagotoviti vse informacije o kaznivih dejanjih, v zvezi s katerimi bi lahko izvajalo svojo pristojnost.