natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Those instruments include, in particular, Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council [12], as well as the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of the Council of Europe and its Recommendation No R(87) 15 [13].
Ti instrumenti vključujejo zlasti Direktivo (EU) 2016/680 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12] ter Konvencijo Sveta Evrope o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov in njegovo Priporočilo št.
Any processing of personal data by Europol should be lawful and fair in relation to the data subjects concerned.
R(87) 15 [13].
The principle of fair processing requires transparency of processing allowing data subjects concerned to exercise their rights under this Regulation.
Vsaka obdelava osebnih podatkov s strani Europola bi morala biti zakonita in poštena do zadevnih posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
It should be possible nevertheless to refuse or restrict access to their personal data if, with due regard to the interests of the data subjects concerned, such refusal or restriction constitutes a necessary measure to enable Europol to fulfil its tasks properly, to protect security and public order or to prevent crime, to guarantee that a national investigation will not be jeopardised or to protect the rights and freedoms of third parties.
Načelo poštene obdelave zahteva preglednost obdelave, ki zadevnim posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, omogoča uveljavljanje svojih pravic na podlagi te uredbe.
To enhance transparency, Europol should make publicly available a document setting out in an intelligible form the applicable provisions regarding the processing of personal data and the means available to data subjects to exercise their rights.
Dostop do njihovih osebnih podatkov pa bi bilo možno zavrniti ali omejiti, če je ob ustreznem upoštevanju interesov posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, taka zavrnitev ali omejitev potrebna za to, da lahko Europol ustrezno opravlja svoje naloge, za zagotavljanje varnosti in javnega reda ali preprečevanje kaznivih dejanj, zagotavljanje, da se ne ogrozi nacionalna preiskava, ali za zaščito pravic in svoboščin tretjih oseb.
Europol should also publish on its website a list of adequacy decisions, agreements and administrative arrangements relating to the transfer of personal data to third countries and international organisations.
Da se izboljša preglednost, bi moral Europol objaviti dokument, v katerem v razumljivi obliki opredeli določbe v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov in sredstvi, ki so na voljo posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, za uveljavljanje njihovih pravic.
Moreover, in order to increase Europol's transparency vis-à-vis Union citizens and its accountability, Europol should publish on its website a list of its Management Board members and, where appropriate, the summaries of the outcome of the meetings of the Management Board, while respecting data protection requirements.
Europol bi moral na svojem spletnem mestu objaviti tudi seznam sklepov o ustreznosti, sporazumov ter upravnih dogovorov o prenosu osebnih podatkov tretjim državam in mednarodnim organizacijam.
As far as possible, personal data should be distinguished according to their degree of accuracy and reliability.
Poleg tega bi moral Europol za večjo preglednost pri svojih odnosih z državljani Unije in povečanje odgovornosti na svojem spletnem mestu objaviti seznam članov upravnega odbora in po potrebi povzetke izidov sej upravnega odbora, pri čemer se upoštevajo zahteve glede varstva podatkov.
Facts should be distinguished from personal assessments, in order to ensure both the protection of individuals and the quality and reliability of the information processed by Europol.
Osebne podatke bi bilo treba čim bolj razlikovati glede na stopnjo njihove točnosti in zanesljivosti.
In the case of information obtained from publicly available sources, particularly sources on the internet, Europol should as far as possible assess the accuracy of such information and the reliability of its source with particular diligence in order to address the risks associated with the internet as regards the protection of personal data and privacy.
Dejstva bi bilo treba razlikovati od osebnih ocen, da se zagotovijo tako varstvo posameznikov kot kakovost in zanesljivost informacij, ki jih obdeluje Europol.
Personal data relating to different categories of data subjects are processed in the area of law enforcement cooperation.
V primeru informacij, pridobljenih iz javno dostopnih virov, zlasti spletnih virov, bi moral Europol, kolikor je to mogoče, oceniti točnost takih informacij in zanesljivost njihovega vira s posebno skrbnostjo zaradi upoštevanja tveganj, povezanih s spletom v zvezi z varstvom osebnih podatkov in zasebnosti.
Europol should make distinctions between personal data in respect of different categories of data subjects as clear as possible.
Na področju sodelovanja na področju preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj se obdelujejo osebni podatki v zvezi z različnimi kategorijami posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
Personal data concerning persons such as victims, witnesses and persons possessing relevant information, as well as personal data concerning minors, should in particular be protected.
Europol bi moral čim jasneje razlikovati med osebnimi podatki različnih kategorij posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
Europol should only process sensitive data if those data supplement other personal data already processed by Europol.
Osebne podatke, ki se nanašajo na osebe, kot so žrtve, priče in osebe s pomembnimi informacijami, ter osebne podatke, ki se nanašajo na mladoletnike, bi bilo treba še posebej varovati.
In the light of the fundamental right to the protection of personal data, Europol should not store personal data for longer than is necessary for the performance of its tasks.
Europol bi moral občutljive podatke obdelovati le tedaj, ko ti podatki dopolnjujejo druge osebne podatke, ki jih je Europol že obdeloval.
The need for continued storage of such data should be reviewed no later than three years after the start of its initial processing.
Ob upoštevanju temeljnih pravic do varstva osebnih podatkov Europol teh ne bi smel hraniti dlje, kot je potrebno za izvajanje njegovih nalog.
To guarantee the security of personal data, Europol and Member States should implement necessary technical and organisational measures.
Najpozneje tri leta po začetku prvotne obdelave podatkov bi bilo treba preveriti, ali je treba take podatke še naprej hraniti.
Any data subject should have a right of access to personal data concerning him or her, a right to rectification if those data are inaccurate, and a right to erasure or restriction if those data are no longer required.
Europol in države članice bi morali izvajati potrebne tehnične in organizacijske ukrepe za zagotavljanje varnosti osebnih podatkov.
The costs related to exercising the right of access to personal data should not represent a barrier to effectively exercising that right.
Vsak posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, bi moral imeti pravico dostopa do osebnih podatkov, ki ga zadevajo, pravico do popravka, če so ti podatki netočni, in pravico do izbrisa ali preprečevanja dostopa do podatkov, če ti podatki niso več potrebni.
The rights of the data subject and the exercise thereof should not affect the obligations incumbent upon Europol and should be subject to the restrictions laid down in this Regulation.
Stroški, povezani z uveljavljanjem pravice do dostopa do osebnih podatkov nikoli ne bi smeli predstavljati ovire za učinkovito uveljavljanje te pravice.
The protection of the rights and freedoms of data subjects requires a clear attribution of the responsibilities under this Regulation.
Pravice posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, in njihovo uveljavljanje ne bi smeli vplivati na obveznosti Europola, zanje pa bi morale veljati omejitve, določene v tej uredbi.
In particular, Member States should be responsible for the accuracy of data, for keeping up to date the data they have transferred to Europol and for the legality of such data transfers.
Varstvo pravic in svoboščin posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, zahteva jasno razdelitev odgovornosti na podlagi te uredbe.
Europol should be responsible for the accuracy of data and for keeping up to date the data provided by other data suppliers or resulting from Europol's own analyses.
Države članice bi zlasti morale biti odgovorne za točnost podatkov, za posodabljanje podatkov, ki so jih prenesle Europolu, in za zakonitost takih prenosov podatkov.
Europol should ensure that data are processed fairly and lawfully, and are collected and processed for a specific purpose.
Europol bi moral biti odgovoren za točnost podatkov in posodabljanje podatkov, ki jih zagotovijo drugi pošiljatelji podatkov ali ki izhajajo iz Europolovih lastnih analiz.
Europol should also ensure that the data are adequate, relevant, not excessive in relation to the purpose for which they are processed, stored no longer than is necessary for that purpose, and processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of personal data and confidentiality of data processing.
Europol bi moral skrbeti, da se podatki obdelujejo pošteno in zakonito ter da se zbirajo in obdelujejo za določen namen.
Europol should keep records of collection, alteration, access, disclosure, combination or erasure of personal data for the purposes of verifying the lawfulness of the data processing, self-monitoring and ensuring proper data integrity and security.
Europol bi moral skrbeti tudi, da so podatki ustrezni, relevantni in ne pretirani glede na namen, za katerega se obdelujejo, da se ne hranijo dlje, kot je to potrebno za zadevni namen, ter da se obdelujejo na način, ki zagotavlja ustrezno varnost osebnih podatkov in zaupnost obdelave podatkov.
Europol should be obliged to co-operate with the EDPS and to make logs or documentation available upon request, so that they can be used for monitoring processing operations.
Europol bi moral zaradi preverjanja zakonitosti obdelave podatkov, notranjega spremljanja ter zagotavljanja ustrezne celovitosti in varnosti podatkov hraniti zapise zbiranja, spreminjanja, dostopa do osebnih podatkov ali njihovega razkrivanja, združevanja ali izbrisa.
Europol should designate a Data Protection Officer to assist it in monitoring compliance with this Regulation.
Europol bi moral biti zavezan k sodelovanju z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov in na zahtevo omogočiti dostop do zapisov ali dokumentacije, da se lahko uporabijo za spremljanje operacij obdelave.
The Data Protection Officer should be in a position to perform his or her duties and tasks independently and effectively, and should be provided with the necessary resources to do so.
Europol bi moral imenovati pooblaščeno osebo za varstvo podatkov, ki bi mu pomagala pri spremljanju skladnosti z določbami te uredbe.
Independent, transparent, accountable and effective structures for supervision are essential for the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data as required by Article 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Pooblaščeni osebi za varstvo podatkov bi moralo biti omogočeno, da neodvisno in učinkovito opravlja svoje dolžnosti in naloge, zagotoviti pa bi ji bilo treba tudi potrebna sredstva v ta namen.
National authorities competent for the supervision of the processing of personal data should monitor the lawfulness of personal data provided by Member States to Europol.
Neodvisne, pregledne, odgovorne in učinkovite strukture za nadzor so bistvene za varstvo posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov, kot je določeno v členu 8(3) Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
The EDPS should monitor the lawfulness of data processing carried out by Europol, exercising his or her functions with complete independence.
Nacionalni organi, pristojni za nadzor nad obdelavo osebnih podatkov, bi morali preverjati, ali države članice zakonito posredujejo osebne podatke Europolu.
In this regard, the prior consultation mechanism is an important safeguard for new types of processing operations.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov bi moral spremljati, ali Europol zakonito obdeluje podatke, in svoje funkcije izvajati popolnoma neodvisno.
This should not apply to specific individual operational activities, such as operational analysis projects, but to the use of new IT systems for the processing of personal data and any substantial changes thereto.
V tem smislu je mehanizem predhodnega posvetovanja pomemben zaščitni ukrep za nove vrste postopkov obdelave.
It is important to ensure strengthened and effective supervision of Europol and to guarantee that the EDPS can make use of appropriate law enforcement data protection expertise when he or she assumes responsibility for data protection supervision of Europol.
To ne bi smelo veljati za specifične posamezne operativne dejavnosti, kot so projekti operativne analize, pač pa za uporabo novih informacijskih sistemov za obdelavo osebnih podatkov in vse bistvene spremembe teh sistemov.
The EDPS and national supervisory authorities should closely cooperate with each other on specific issues requiring national involvement and should ensure the consistent application of this Regulation throughout the Union.
Pomembno je zagotoviti okrepljen in učinkovit nadzor nad Europolom, pa tudi, da Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov lahko uporablja ustrezno strokovno znanje s področja varstva podatkov pri preprečevanju, odkrivanju in preiskovanju kaznivih dejanj, kadar prevzame odgovornost za nadzor nad varstvom podatkov Europola.
In order to facilitate the cooperation between the EDPS and the national supervisory authorities, but without prejudice to the independence of the EDPS and his or her responsibility for data protection supervision of Europol, they should regularly meet within the Cooperation Board, which, as an advisory body, should deliver opinions, guidelines, recommendations and best practices on various issues requiring national involvement.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov in nacionalni nadzorni organi bi morali tesno sodelovati drug z drugim pri določenih vprašanjih, ki zahtevajo nacionalno sodelovanje, ter zagotoviti dosledno uporabo te uredbe v vsej Uniji.
As Europol also processes non-operational personal data, unrelated to criminal investigations, such as personal data concerning staff of Europol, service providers or visitors, the processing of such data should be subject to Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Da bi olajšali sodelovanje med Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov in nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi, vendar brez poseganja v neodvisnost Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov in njegovo odgovornost za nadzor nad varstvom podatkov Europola, bi se morali navedeni redno sestajati v okviru odbora za sodelovanje, ki bi moral kot svetovalni organ dajati mnenja, smernice in priporočila ter izpostaviti najboljše prakse v zvezi z različnimi vprašanji, ki zahtevajo nacionalno sodelovanje.
The EDPS should hear and investigate complaints lodged by data subjects.
Ker Europol obdeluje tudi neoperativne osebne podatke, ki niso povezani s preiskavami kaznivih dejanj, kot so osebni podatki, ki se nanašajo na osebje Europola, ponudnike storitev ali obiskovalce, bi se morala za obdelavo takšnih podatkov uporabljati Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001.
The investigation following a complaint should be carried out, subject to judicial review, to the extent that is appropriate in the specific case.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov bi moral obravnavati in preiskati pritožbe, ki jih vložijo posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
The national supervisory authority should inform the data subject of the progress and the outcome of the complaint within a reasonable period.
Preiskava na podlagi pritožbe bi se morala izvesti v obsegu, primernem za posamezni primer, in je lahko predmet sodne presoje.
Any individual should have the right to a judicial remedy against a decision of the EDPS concerning him or her.
Nacionalni nadzorni organ bi moral posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, v razumnem roku obvestiti o stanju zadeve in o odločitvi o pritožbi.
Europol should be subject to the general rules on contractual and non-contractual liability applicable to Union institutions, agencies and bodies, save as regards the rules on liability for unlawful data processing.
Vsak posameznik bi moral imeti pravico do pravnega sredstva zoper odločitve Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov, ki ga zadevajo.
It may be unclear for the individual concerned whether damage suffered as a result of unlawful data processing is a consequence of action by Europol or by a Member State.
Za Europol bi morala veljati splošna pravila o pogodbeni in nepogodbeni odgovornosti, ki se uporabljajo za institucije, agencije in organe Unije, razen pravil o odgovornosti za nezakonito obdelavo podatkov.
Europol and the Member State in which the event that gave rise to the damage occurred should therefore be jointly and severally liable.
Pri zadevnih posameznikih je lahko včasih nejasno, ali je škoda, ki so jo utrpeli zaradi nezakonite obdelave podatkov, posledica dejanj Europola ali države članice.
While respecting the role of the European Parliament together with national parliaments in the scrutiny of Europol's activities, it is necessary that Europol be a fully accountable and transparent internal organisation.
Zato bi morala biti Europol in država članica, v kateri se je zgodil dogodek, zaradi katerega je oseba utrpela škodo, skupno in solidarno odgovorna.
To that end, in light of Article 88 TFEU, procedures should be established for the scrutiny of Europol's activities by the European Parliament together with national parliaments.
Ob upoštevanju vloge Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov pri nadzoru dejavnosti Europola je potrebno, da je Europol popolnoma odgovorna in pregledna notranja organizacija.
Such procedures should be subject to point (c) of Article 12 TEU and to Article 9 of Protocol No 1, providing that the European Parliament and national parliaments are together to determine the organisation and promotion of effective and regular interparliamentary cooperation within the Union.
V ta namen bi bilo treba ob upoštevanju člena 88 PDEU določiti postopke za nadzor dejavnosti Europola, ki ga izvaja Evropski parlament skupaj z nacionalnimi parlamenti.
The procedures to be established for the scrutiny of Europol's activities should take due account of the need to ensure that the European Parliament and the national parliaments stand on an equal footing, as well as the need to safeguard the confidentiality of operational information.
Za take postopke bi morala veljati točka (c) člena 12 PEU in člen 9 Protokola št. 1, v katerem je določeno, da Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti skupaj določijo, kako organizirati in spodbujati učinkovito in redno medparlamentarno sodelovanje znotraj Unije.
However, the way in which national parliaments scrutinise their governments in relation to the activities of the Union is a matter for the particular constitutional organisation and practice of each Member State.
Postopki, ki bodo določeni za nadzor dejavnosti Europola, bi morali upoštevati potrebe po zagotovitvi enakopravnosti Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov ter potrebe po varovanju zaupnosti operativnih informacij.
The Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (the ‘Staff Regulations’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (the ‘Conditions of Employment of Other Servants’) laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 [14] should apply to Europol staff.
Vendar pa način nadzora nacionalnih parlamentov nad njihovimi vladami v zvezi z dejavnostmi Unije ureja ustavna ureditev in praksa vsake posamezne države članice.
Europol should be able to employ staff from the competent authorities of the Member States as temporary agents whose period of service should be limited in order to maintain the principle of rotation, as the subsequent reintegration of such staff members into the service of their competent authority facilitates close cooperation between Europol and the competent authorities of the Member States.
Za osebje Europola bi morali veljati Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Kadrovski predpisi) in Pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropske Unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev), ki jih določa Uredba Sveta (EGS, Euratom, ESPJ) št. 259/68 [14].
Member States should take any measure necessary to ensure that staff engaged at Europol as temporary agents may, at the end of their term of service at Europol, return to the national civil service to which they belong.
Europol bi moral imeti možnost, da zaposli osebje iz pristojnih organov držav članic kot začasne uslužbence, katerih obdobje službovanja bi moralo biti omejeno, da se ohrani načelo rotacije, saj je njihova vrnitev v matični pristojni organ v prid tesnemu sodelovanju med Europolom in pristojnimi organi držav članic.
Given the nature of the duties of Europol and the role of the Executive Director, the competent committee of the European Parliament should be able to invite the Executive Director to appear before it prior to his or her appointment, as well as prior to any extension of his or her term of office.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se osebje, zaposleno v Europolu kot začasni uslužbenci, po koncu svojega obdobja službovanja v Europolu lahko vrnejo v nacionalne javne službe, katerim pripadajo.
The Executive Director should also present the annual report to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Glede na naravo nalog Europola in vlogo izvršnega direktorja bi moral imeti pristojni odbor Evropskega parlamenta možnost povabiti izvršnega direktorja, da se mu predstavi pred njegovim imenovanjem in tudi pred vsakim podaljšanjem njegovega mandata.
Furthermore, the European Parliament and the Council should be able to invite the Executive Director to report on the performance of his or her duties.
Izvršni direktor bi moral Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti tudi letno poročilo.
To guarantee the full autonomy and independence of Europol, it should be granted an autonomous budget, with revenue coming essentially from a contribution from the general budget of the Union.
Poleg tega bi morala Evropski parlament in Svet imeti možnost izvršnega direktorja povabiti, da poroča o izvrševanju svojih nalog.
The Union budgetary procedure should be applicable as far as the Union contribution and any other subsidies chargeable to the general budget of the Union are concerned.
Da se zagotovi popolna avtonomija in neodvisnost Europola, bi mu bilo treba zagotoviti avtonomen proračun, katerega prihodki so v prvi vrsti prispevki iz splošnega proračuna Unije.
The auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors.
Za prispevek Unije in morebitne druge subvencije v breme splošnega proračuna Unije bi bilo treba uporabiti proračunski postopek Unije.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 [15] should apply to Europol.
Revizijo zaključnih računov bi moralo opravljati Računsko sodišče.
Given their specific legal and administrative powers and their technical competences in conducting cross-border information-exchange activities, operations and investigations, including in joint investigation teams, and in providing facilities for training, the competent authorities of the Member States should be able to receive grants from Europol without a call for proposals in accordance with point (d) of Article 190(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 [16].
Za Europol bi se morala uporabljati Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1271/2013 [15].