natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the World Trade Organisation on the modification of paragraph C(ii) of Annex 3 to the WTO Agreement as regards the frequency of WTO Trade Policy Reviews and of the rules of procedure of the Trade Policy Review Body
o stališču, ki se zavzame v imenu Evropske unije v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji, o spremembi odstavka C(ii) Priloge 3 k Sporazumu STO glede pogostosti pregledov trgovinske politike STO in o spremembi poslovnika organa za pregled trgovinske politike
Paragraph C(ii) of Annex 3 to the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation (‘WTO Agreement’) sets out the frequency for reviewing WTO Members' trade policies and practices.
V odstavku C(ii) Priloge 3 k Marakeškemu sporazumu o ustanovitvi Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum STO) je določena pogostost pregledov trgovinskih politik in praks članic STO.
The frequency of the reviews of each Member's trade policy depends on its share of world trade.
Pogostost pregledov trgovinske politike vsake članice je odvisna od njenega deleža v svetovni trgovini.
The four biggest trading Members are currently examined every two years.
Štiri članice z največjim trgovinskim deležem se trenutno pregleda vsaki dve leti.
The next 16 Members in terms of their share of world trade are reviewed every four years, while all other Members are currently reviewed every six years.
Naslednjih 16 članic glede na delež v svetovni trgovini se pregleda vsaka štiri leta, medtem ko se druge članice trenutno pregleda vsakih šest let.
The increase in WTO membership since 1995 has also increased the number of reviews necessary to comply with Annex 3 to the WTO Agreement, increasing the burden on Members and the WTO Secretariat.
S povečanjem članstva v STO od leta 1995 se je povečalo tudi število pregledov, potrebnih za skladnost s Prilogo 3 k Sporazumu STO, zaradi česar se je povečala obremenitev članic in sekretariata STO.
In order to safeguard the effectiveness of the review system, the Trade Policy Review Body (TPRB) of the WTO suggests extending by one year the cycles currently in place.
Organ STO za pregled trgovinske politike za zagotovitev učinkovitosti sistema pregledovanja predlaga, da se trenutno veljavni cikli podaljšajo za eno leto.
As a result, WTO Members would be reviewed every three, five or seven years, depending on their share of world trade.
Posledično bi se članice STO pregledalo vsakih tri, pet ali sedem let, odvisno od njihovega deleža v svetovni trgovini.
In accordance with Article X:8 of the WTO Agreement, decisions approving amendments to Annex 3 to the WTO Agreement are to be taken by consensus by the Ministerial Conference or, pursuant to Article IV:2 of the WTO Agreement, by the General Council in the intervals between meetings of the Ministerial Conference, and are to take effect for all WTO Members upon approval.
V skladu s členom X(8) Sporazuma STO je treba sklepe o odobritvi sprememb Priloge 3 k Sporazumu STO sprejeti soglasno na ministrski konferenci ali jih v skladu s členom IV(2) Sporazuma STO sprejme Generalni svet v obdobjih med dvema zasedanjema ministrske konference, po odobritvi pa začnejo veljati za vse članice STO.
In order to safeguard the effectiveness of the review system, the TPRB has recommended also to amend its rules of procedure to introduce slight modifications that would facilitate the conduct of reviews, such as granting four weeks instead of the current three to the Member reviewed so as to reply to advance questions when it uses the alternative timeline.
Organ za pregled trgovinske politike je za zagotovitev učinkovitosti sistema pregledovanja tudi priporočil manjše spremembe svojega poslovnika, s katerimi bi se olajšalo izvajanje pregledov, kot je dodelitev štirih (namesto dosedanjih treh) tednov članici, ki se pregleduje, da lahko pri uporabi alternativnega časovnega razporeda odgovori na predhodna vprašanja.
Other changes in the rules of procedure involve, for example, the possibility for a WTO Member to present significant changes to its trade policy at a meeting of the TPRB in between two Trade Policy Reviews or the possibility, on request of a Member, to make the second day of the review more interactive, using panels or the issuance by the WTO Secretariat of a list of speakers for the interventions of the WTO Members on the first day of the review.
Druge spremembe poslovnika vključujejo na primer možnost, da članica STO predstavi znatne spremembe svoje trgovinske politike na zasedanju med dvema pregledoma trgovinske politike ali možnost, da organ na zahtevo članice naredi drugi dan pregleda bolj interaktiven s pomočjo moderatorjev ali da sekretariat STO objavi seznam govornikov za prispevke članic STO na prvi dan pregleda.
The TPRB can take the decision to amend its own rules of procedure pursuant to Article IV:4 of the WTO Agreement.
Organ za pregled trgovinske politike lahko v skladu s členom IV(4) Sporazuma STO sprejme sklep, s katerim spremeni svoj poslovnik.
It is in the interest of the Union to ensure a well-functioning Trade Policy Review Mechanism so that all WTO Members continue to be reviewed regularly and meetings in the TPRB are as efficient and well prepared as possible.
V interesu Unije je, da se zagotovi dobro delujoč mehanizem za pregled trgovinske politike, tako da se vse članice STO še naprej redno pregleduje ter da so zasedanja organa za pregled trgovinske politike čim učinkovitejša in čim bolje pripravljena.
Therefore, it is appropriate to establish that the position to be taken on behalf of the Union in the WTO is to extend by one year the cycles of Trade Policy Reviews of WTO Members and to modify the rules of procedure of the TPRB to facilitate the conduct of reviews,
Zato je primerno, da se oblikuje stališče, ki se zavzame v imenu Unije v STO, da se cikli pregledov trgovinske politike članic STO podaljšajo za eno leto in se zaradi lažjega izvajanja pregledov spremeni poslovnik organa za pregled trgovinske politike –
The position to be taken on behalf of the Union within the General Council of the World Trade Organisation shall be to join the consensus to amend paragraph C(ii) of Annex 3 to the WTO Agreement to extend by one year the cycles of Trade Policy Reviews of WTO Members.
Stališče, ki se v imenu Unije zavzame v Generalnem svetu Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, je, da se pridružuje soglasju za spremembo odstavka C(ii) Priloge 3 k Sporazumu STO, s katero se cikli pregledov trgovinske politike članic STO podaljšajo za eno leto.
The review cycles in paragraph C(ii) of Annex 3 to the WTO Agreement depend on the share of world trade and currently stand at two, four or six years.
Cikli pregleda iz odstavka C(ii) Priloge 3 k Sporazumu STO so odvisni od deleža v svetovni trgovini in so trenutno na dve, štiri ali šest let.
They will be replaced, respectively, by cycles of three, five or seven years.
Nadomestili se bodo s cikli na tri, pet ali sedem let.
This position shall be expressed by the Commission at the upcoming meeting of the General Council.
To stališče izrazi Komisija na prihodnjem zasedanju generalnega sveta.
The position to be taken on behalf of the Union within the Trade Policy Review Body shall be to join the consensus to amend the TPRB's rules of procedure, as envisaged in Document WT/RD/TPR/745.
Stališče, ki se v imenu Unije zavzame v organu za pregled trgovinske politike, je, da se pridružuje soglasju za spremembo poslovnika organa za pregled trgovinske politike, kot je določeno v dokumentu WT/RD/TPR/745.
This position shall be expressed by the Commission at an upcoming meeting of the TPRB.
To stališče izrazi Komisija na prihodnjem zasedanju organa za pregled trgovinske politike.
After its adoption, the amendment of paragraph C(ii) of Annex 3 to the WTO Agreement, as notified by the WTO, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Po sprejetju se sprememba odstavka C(ii) Priloge 3 k Sporazumu STO, kakor jo je sporočil STO, objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Done at Brussels, 11 May 2017.
V Bruslju, 11. maja 2017
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/818
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2017/818
In accordance with Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code, the Council adopted on 12 May 2016, on a proposal from the Commission, an Implementing Decision setting out a Recommendation for temporary internal border control in exceptional circumstances putting the overall functioning of the Schengen area at risk.
Svet je 12. maja 2016 v skladu s členom 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah na predlog Komisije sprejel izvedbeni sklep o priporočilu za začasni nadzor na notranjih mejah v izrednih okoliščinah, ki ogrožajo splošno delovanje schengenskega območja.
The Council recommended that five Schengen States (Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway) maintain proportionate temporary border control at a limited number of their internal border sections, for an initial period of 6 months, in order to address the serious threat to public policy and internal security in these States by — deficiencies in external border control in Greece and the subsequent secondary movements of irregular migrants entering via Greece and who move to other Schengen States.
Svet je priporočil, da pet schengenskih držav (Avstrija, Nemčija, Danska, Švedska in Norveška) ohrani sorazmeren začasen mejni nadzor na omejenem številu odsekov njihovih notranjih meja najprej za šest mesecev, da bi se lahko odzvali na resno grožnjo javnemu redu in notranji varnosti v teh državah, ki je posledica pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zunanjih meja v Grčiji in poznejših sekundarnih gibanj migrantov brez urejenega statusa, ki prek Grčije vstopajo v druge schengenske države.
This period was prolonged by the Council on a proposal from the Commission twice, respectively on 11 November 2016 and on 7 February 2017, for further periods of 3 months at a time.
Svet je to obdobje na predlog Komisije dvakrat podaljšal, vsakič za tri mesece, in sicer 11. novembra 2016 in 7. februarja 2017.
Under Articles 25 and 29 of the Schengen Borders Code, the initial period recommended by the Council can be further prolonged if the exceptional circumstances persist.
V skladu s členoma 25 in 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah se lahko prvotno obdobje, ki ga je priporočil Svet, dodatno podaljša, če izredne okoliščine še vedno obstajajo.
The Recommendations of 11 November 2016 and 7 February 2017 required that the Schengen States concerned report monthly to the Commission on the outcome of the controls carried out and on the assessment concerning the continued necessity of such controls, when applicable.
Priporočili z dne 11. novembra 2016 in 7. februarja 2017 določata, da morajo zadevne schengenske države mesečno poročati Komisiji o rezultatih opravljenega nadzora in, kadar je to ustrezno, o oceni nadaljnje potrebe po takem nadzoru.
The Commission received such reports from all the Schengen States concerned.
Komisija je taka poročila prejela od vseh zadevnih schengenskih držav.
It also confirms a stabilisation of the situation in these States, in terms of number of refusals of entry and asylum applications received during the controls.
Potrjujejo tudi, da se razmere v teh državah stabilizirajo, kar zadeva število oseb, ki jim je bil zavrnjen vstop, in prošenj za azil, prejetih med kontrolami.
However, despite this progress, the conditions identified in the Roadmap ‘Back to Schengen’ in order to allow lifting all internal border control and returning to a normally functioning Schengen area are still not entirely fulfilled.
Kljub temu napredku pa pogoji, ki so v časovnem načrtu „Vrnitev k schengenski ureditvi“ opredeljeni za odpravo nadzora na notranjih mejah in ponovno normalizacijo delovanja schengenskega območja, še vedno niso v celoti izpolnjeni.
Moreover, in spite of the ongoing progress and the significant improvement related to the external border management that Greece has made in 2016 as well as the fulfillment by Greece of recommendations made following the 2015 unannounced evaluation visit, an important number of irregular migrants is still present in Greece and along the Western Balkans route.
Poleg tega je kljub temu, da Grčija stalno dosega napredek in je v letu 2016 znatno izboljšala upravljanje zunanje meje, prav tako pa je uresničila priporočila, ki jih je dobila po nenapovedanem ocenjevalnem obisku v letu 2015, v Grčiji in na zahodnobalkanski poti še vedno prisotno veliko število migrantov brez urejenega statusa.
The risk of irregular secondary movements within the Schengen area of these migrants remains.
Zato je tveganje za sekundarna gibanja teh migrantov znotraj schengenskega območja še vedno prisotno.
In its Communication ‘Back to Schengen — A Roadmap’, the Commission identified the various policies to be put in place to return to a fully functioning Schengen area.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu „Vrnitev k schengenski ureditvi – časovni načrt“ opredelila različne politike, ki jih je treba uvesti za vrnitev k popolnoma delujočemu schengenskemu območju.
The process of rolling out of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency is ongoing.
Priprave na začetek delovanja Evropske agencije za mejno in obalno stražo potekajo.
However, further contributions from Member States are needed to complete its resources and allow it to fully play its role in securing the external borders of the Union.
Vendar so potrebni še nadaljnji prispevki držav članic, da se za Agencijo zberejo potrebna sredstva in se ji omogoči celovito opravljanje naloge varovanja zunanjih meja Unije.
Recommendations following the first vulnerability assessments have not been issued yet.
Priporočila po prvih ocenah ranljivosti še niso bila izdana.
The status agreements with Serbia is currently being negotiated.
Trenutno potekajo pogajanja za sporazum o statusu s Srbijo.
After more than 1 year, the implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016 continues to deliver tangible results, as was confirmed in the fifth progress report [2].
Po več kot enem letu izvajanje Izjave EU-Turčija z dne 18. marca 2016 še vedno daje vidne rezultate, kot je bilo potrjeno v petem poročilu o napredku [2].
Yet arrivals continue to outpace the number of returns from Greece to Turkey which leads to additional pressure on the Greek islands.
Kljub temu trenutno število prihodov še vedno presega število vrnitev iz Grčije v Turčijo, kar še dodatno bremeni grške otoke.
Progress on other elements of the Statement needs to continue.
Pri drugih elementih izjave je treba še naprej dosegati napredek.
The implementation of the Statement thus needs to be constantly monitored.
Izvajanje izjave je treba zato nenehno spremljati.
The same applies to the situation along the Western Balkans Route and the implementation of the Statement of the Western Balkans Route Leaders meeting.
To velja tudi za razmere na zahodnobalkanski poti in izvajanje izjave, ki je bila sprejeta na srečanju voditeljev držav na zahodnobalkanski poti.
The exceptional circumstances constituting a serious threat to public policy and internal security and putting at risk the overall functioning of the Schengen area therefore still persist.
Zato izredne okoliščine, ki pomenijo resno grožnjo javnemu redu in notranji varnosti ter ogrožajo splošno delovanje schengenskega območja, še vedno obstajajo.
In light of the facts above, it appears justified, as a last resort measure, to allow a further and final prolongation of the temporary border control at the internal borders concerned by the Schengen States currently carrying out such controls, namely Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and the associated country Norway, in accordance with Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code.
Zaradi navedenih dejstev se zdi upravičeno, da se schengenskim državam, ki trenutno izvajajo začasni nadzor na notranjih mejah, in sicer Avstriji, Nemčiji, Danski, Švedski in pridruženi državi Norveški, kot skrajni ukrep v skladu s členom 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah dovoli nadaljnje in zadnje podaljšanje takega nadzora.
The Council takes note of the Commission Recommendation on proportionate police checks and police cooperation in the Schengen area that would also contribute in gradually phasing out temporary internal border controls with the objective of lifting all internal border control and returning to a normal functioning of the Schengen area as soon as possible by giving precedence to the use of police checks to adequately address the serious threats to public policy or internal security.
Svet je seznanjen s priporočilom Komisije o sorazmernih policijskih kontrolah in policijskem sodelovanju na schengenskem območju, ki bi prispevalo tudi k postopnemu prenehanju izvajanja začasnega nadzora na notranjih mejah ter cilju odprave nadzora na vseh notranjih mejah in čimprejšnji ponovni normalizaciji delovanja schengenskega območja, saj bi se za ustrezno odzivanje na resne grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti prednostno uporabljale policijske kontrole.
The Council takes note that the Commission recommends that all Schengen States implement the recommended measures as soon as possible and at the latest within 6 months.
Svet je seznanjen s tem, da Komisija vsem schengenskim državam priporoča, naj čim prej in najpozneje v šestih mesecih izvedejo priporočene ukrepe.
Based on the estimation of the remaining time necessary to implement the pending measures aiming at ensuring adequate protection of the EU external borders and adequate security within the Schengen area, this prolongation should not exceed 6 months as from the date of adoption of the present Implementing Decision.
Na podlagi ocene preostalega časa, ki je potreben za izvedbo še nedokončanih ukrepov za ustrezno varovanje zunanjih meja EU in zagotavljanje ustrezne varnosti znotraj schengenskega območja, to podaljšanje ne bi smelo biti daljše od šestih mesecev od datuma sprejetja tega izvedbenega sklepa.
The Member States that decide to continue carrying out internal border control under the present Implementing Decision should notify the other Member States, the European Parliament and the Commission accordingly.
Države članice, ki se odločijo, da bodo še naprej izvajale nadzor na notranjih mejah na podlagi tega izvedbenega sklepa, bi morale o tem uradno obvestiti druge države članice, Evropski parlament in Komisijo.
Before opting for such border controls, the Member States concerned should examine whether other measures alternative to border controls and impeding less the free movement of persons and goods could not be used to effectively remedy the identified threat.
Preden se odločijo za tak nadzor meje, bi morale zadevne države članice preučiti, ali bi lahko za učinkovito odpravo ugotovljene grožnje uporabile druge ukrepe kot je nadzor meje, ki manj ovirajo prosto gibanje oseb in blaga.
In the Commission Recommendation on proportionate police checks and police cooperation in the Schengen area, the Commission calls upon the Schengen States to use their police powers across the territory, including in the border area and on the main routes in a more effective way and give precedence to police checks.
V priporočilu o sorazmernih policijskih kontrolah in policijskem sodelovanju na schengenskem območju Komisija poziva schengenske države, naj učinkoviteje izvajajo svoja policijska pooblastila na vsem svojem ozemlju, tudi na mejnem območju in na glavnih poteh, ter prednostno uporabljajo policijske kontrole.
However, pending the implementation of that Commission Recommendation, the Schengen States concerned should inform of the outcome of the reflection on the most appropriate tools and the reasons for opting for border controls as a last resort measure in their notifications.
Do začetka izvajanja priporočila Komisije bi morale zadevne schengenske države z uradnim obvestilom sporočiti, do kakšnega rezultata so prišle pri preučevanju najustreznejših orodij ter iz kakšnih razlogov so se odločile za uporabo mejnega nadzora kot skrajnega ukrepa.
Accordingly, it can be envisaged that any further decrease of the flow should lead to suspending the controls at given border sections.
V skladu s tem se lahko predvideva, da bi moralo vsako nadaljnje zmanjšanje pritoka privesti do opustitve nadzora na zadevnih mejnih odsekih.
Only targeted controls, based on constantly updated risk analysis and intelligence, should be carried out, in order to optimise the benefit of the controls and limit their negative effects on free movement.
Izvajati bi bilo treba le ciljno usmerjen nadzor, ki temelji na nenehnem posodabljanju analize tveganja in obveščevalnih podatkov, da bi se optimizirale koristi nadzora in omejili njegovi negativni učinki na prosti pretok.
The Schengen States affected by these controls at the relevant border sections should be admitted to regularly express their views on their necessity; the Schengen State having decided to reintroduce such controls should take these views into account when examining and reviewing the necessity of such checks, with the objective of progressively reducing them.
Schengenskim državam, ki jih prizadene ta nadzor na ustreznih mejnih odsekih, bi moralo biti omogočeno, da redno izražajo svoja mnenja o nujnosti nadzora; schengenska država, ki se je odločila za ponovno uvedbo takega nadzora, bi morala ta mnenja upoštevati pri obravnavanju in preverjanju nujnosti takega nadzora s ciljem, da se nadzor postopoma zmanjšuje.
At the end of each month of implementation of the present Implementing Decision, a complete report on the results of the checks carried out should be promptly sent to the Commission and the Council, together with an assessment of their continuous necessity when applicable.
Ob koncu vsakega meseca izvajanja tega izvedbenega sklepa bi bilo treba Komisiji in Svetu pravočasno poslati popolno poročilo o rezultatih opravljenih kontrol, skupaj z oceno nadaljnje potrebe po takih kontrolah, kadar je to ustrezno.
The Council takes note that the Commission has announced that it will closely monitor the application of this Implementing Decision,
Svet je seznanjen z napovedjo Komisije, da bo pozorno spremljala izvajanje tega izvedbenega sklepa –
Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway to prolong proportionate, temporary border controls for a maximum period of 6 months, starting from the day of adoption of this Implementing Decision, at the following internal borders:
Avstrija, Nemčija, Danska, Švedska in Norveška naj podaljšajo sorazmerni začasni nadzor meje za obdobje največ šest mesecev z začetkom na dan sprejetja tega izvedbenega sklepa na naslednjih notranjih mejah:
Before deciding on further prolongation of such controls based on this Recommendation, the Member States concerned should exchange views with the relevant Member State(s) with a view to ensuring that internal border controls are carried out only where it is considered necessary and proportionate.
Preden se zadevne države članice odločijo za nadaljnje podaljšanje takega nadzora na podlagi tega priporočila, bi morale izmenjati mnenja z ustreznimi državami članicami za zagotovitev, da se bo nadzor na notranjih mejah izvajal le, kjer je tak ukrep nujen in sorazmeren.
Furthermore, the Member States concerned should ensure that internal border controls are only carried out as a last resort measure when other alternative measures cannot achieve the same effect, and only at those parts of the internal border where it is considered necessary and proportionate, in accordance with the Schengen Borders Code.
Poleg tega bi morale zadevne države članice v skladu z Zakonikom o schengenskih mejah zagotoviti, da se bo nadzor na notranjih mejah izvajal le kot skrajni ukrep, kadar z drugimi ukrepi ne bo mogoče doseči enakega učinka, in le na tistih delih notranje meje, kjer je tak ukrep nujen in sorazmeren.
When it provides the same security results, the use of police powers should be preferred as a measure with a lesser impact on the free movement of persons and goods.
Kadar je mogoče s policijskimi pooblastili doseči iste varnostne rezultate, bi jih bilo treba prednostno uporabljati, saj imajo manjši vpliv na gibanje oseb in blaga.