natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the present review investigation was limited to the clarification of the product scope and since the product types in question were not covered by the original investigation and the consequent anti-dumping measure, it is considered appropriate that the findings of this review be applied from the date of the entry into force of the original Regulation, including any imports subject to provisional duties between 16 November 2012 and 16 May 2013.
Zato bi bilo treba za blago, ki ni zajeto s členom 1(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 412/2013, kakor se spremeni s to uredbo, dokončne protidampinške dajatve, plačane ali vknjižene v skladu s členom 1(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 412/2013, ter začasne protidampinške dajatve, dokončno pobrane v skladu s členom 2 iste uredbe, povrniti ali odpustiti.
The Commission has not found any overriding reason preventing the application of such retroactive provision.
Povrnitev ali odpustitev dajatev je treba zahtevati pri nacionalnih carinskih organih v skladu z veljavno carinsko zakonodajo.
Consequently, for goods not covered by Article 1(1) of the original Regulation as amended by this Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty paid or entered in the accounts pursuant to Article 1(1) of the original Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 and the provisional antidumping duties definitively collected pursuant to Article 2 of the same Regulation should be repaid or remitted.
Ta pregled ne vpliva na datum prenehanja veljavnosti Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 412/2013 v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
Repayment or remission must be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with applicable customs legislation.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 –
This review does not affect the date on which the original Regulation will expire pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Člen 1(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 412/2013 se nadomesti z:
Article 1
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznake KN ex69111000, ex69120021, ex69120023, ex69120025 in ex69120029 (oznake TARIC 6911100090, 6912002111, 6912002191, 6912002310, 6912002510 in 6912002910) in s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Article 1(1) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 is hereby replaced by the following:
Izključeno je naslednje blago:
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware currently falling within CN codes ex69111000, ex69120021, ex69120023, ex69120025 and ex69120029 (TARIC codes 6911100090, 6912002111, 6912002191, 6912002310, 6912002510 and 6912002910) and originating in the People's Republic of China.
keramični mlinčki za začimbe ali zelišča in njihovi keramični drobilni deli,
The following goods are excluded:
keramični kavni mlinčki,
ceramic condiment or spice mills and their ceramic grinding parts,
keramični brusilci nožev,
ceramic coffee mills,
keramični brusilci,
ceramic knife sharpeners,
keramična kuhinjska orodja, ki se uporabljajo za rezanje, mletje, ribanje, strganje in lupljenje ter
ceramic sharpeners,
kamni za peko pice, ki so izdelani iz kordieritne keramike in se uporabljajo za peko pice ali kruha.“
ceramic kitchen tools to be used for cutting, grinding, grating, slicing, scraping and peeling, and
Člen 2
cordierite ceramic pizza-stones of a kind used for baking pizza or bread.’.
Za blago, ki ni zajeto s členom 1(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 412/2013, kakor se spremeni s to uredbo, se dokončne protidampinške dajatve, plačane ali vknjižene v skladu s členom 1(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 412/2013 v prvotni različici, ter začasne protidampinške dajatve, dokončno pobrane v skladu s členom 2 iste uredbe, povrnejo ali odpustijo.
Article 2
Vračilo in odpust se zahtevata pri nacionalnih carinskih organih v skladu z veljavno carinsko zakonodajo.
For goods not covered by Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 as amended by this Regulation, the definitive antidumping duties paid or entered into account pursuant to Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 in its initial version and the provisional anti-dumping duties definitively collected pursuant to Article 2 of the same Regulation shall be repaid or remitted.
Če se rok treh let iz člena 121(1)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] izteče pred dnem objave te uredbe oziroma na dan njene objave ali v roku šestih mesecev po navedenem datumu, se podaljša za šest mesecev po datumu objave te uredbe v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 121(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 952/2013.Člen 3
Repayment and remission shall be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with applicable customs legislation.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Where the time limit of three years provided for in Article 121(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and Council [4] expired before or on the date of publication of this Regulation, or within six months after that date, it shall be prolonged for a period of six months after the date of publication of this Regulation pursuant to Article 121(1), second paragraph of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.Article 3
Uporablja se od 16. novembra 2012.
It shall apply from 16 November 2012.
V Bruslju, 23. oktobra 2017
Done at Brussels, 23 October 2017.
Predsednik
For the Commission
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
The President
UL L 131, 15.5.2013, str.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p.
1.
21.
UL C 117, 12.4.2017, str.
OJ L 131, 15.5.2013, p.
12.
1.
UL L 269, 10.10.2013, str. 1.
Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2017/1938 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
concerning measures to safeguard the security of gas supply and repealing Regulation (EU) No 994/2010
o ukrepih za zagotavljanje zanesljivosti oskrbe s plinom in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 994/2010
A large proportion of such gas is imported into the Union from third countries.
Te cilje bi bilo treba doseči s stroškovno najučinkovitejšimi ukrepi in brez izkrivljanja trgov plina.
It can also severely damage the Union economy and can have a major social impact, in particular on vulnerable groups of customers.
Države članice so zdaj bolje pripravljene na spopadanje s krizo v oskrbi, odkar se od njih zahteva priprava načrtov preventivnih ukrepov in načrtov za izredne razmere, ter so bolje zaščitene, ker morajo izpolnjevati številne obveznosti glede infrastrukturne zmogljivosti in oskrbe s plinom.
This Regulation aims to ensure that all the necessary measures are taken to safeguard an uninterrupted supply of gas throughout the Union, in particular to protected customers in the event of difficult climatic conditions or disruptions of the gas supply.
Vendar so bila v poročilu Komisije o izvajanju Uredbe (EU) št. 994/2010 iz oktobra 2014 izpostavljena področja, na katerih bi izboljšave navedene uredbe nadalje okrepile zanesljivost oskrbe s plinom v Uniji.
Those objectives should be achieved through the most cost-effective measures and in such a way that gas markets are not distorted.
V sporočilu Komisije z dne 16. oktobra 2014 o kratkoročni odpornosti evropskega sistema oskrbe s plinom so bili preučeni učinki delnih ali popolnih motenj oskrbe s plinom iz Rusije in bilo je ugotovljeno, da izključno nacionalni pristopi v primeru resnih motenj niso posebno učinkoviti zaradi svojega obsega, ki je že po definiciji omejen.
Union law, in particular Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [7] and Regulation (EU)No 994/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8], has already had a significant positive impact on the security of gas supply in the Union, both in terms of preparation and mitigation.
Stresni test je pokazal, kako bi lahko z bolj sodelovalnim pristopom med državami članicami bistveno zmanjšali učinek zelo resnih motenj v najbolj ranljivih državah članicah.
Member States are better prepared to face a supply crisis now that they are required to establish preventive action plans and emergency plans, and they are better protected now that they have to meet a number of obligations regarding infrastructure capacity and gas supply.
Energetska varnost je eden od ciljev strategije za energetsko unijo, kot so določeni v sporočilu Komisije z dne 25. februarja 2015 o okvirni strategiji za trdno energetsko unijo s podnebno politiko, usmerjeno v prihodnost, v katerem sta tudi poudarjena načelo „energijska učinkovitost je na prvem mestu“ in potreba po celovitem izvajanju obstoječih pravnih aktov Unije s področja energetike.
However, the Commission's report on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 994/2010 of October 2014 highlighted areas in which improvements to that Regulation could further bolster the security of gas supply in the Union.
V sporočilu je poudarjeno dejstvo, da energetska unija temelji na solidarnosti, zapisani v členu 194 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), in zaupanju, ki sta nujna elementa energetske varnosti.
The Commission's communication of 16 October 2014 on the short-term resilience of the European gas system analysed the effects of a partial or complete disruption of gas supplies from Russia and concluded that purely national approaches are not very effective in the event of severe disruption, given their scope, which is by definition limited.
Namen te uredbe je okrepiti solidarnost in zaupanje med državami članicami ter uvesti ukrepe, potrebne za dosego navedenih ciljev.
The stress test showed how a more cooperative approach among Member States could significantly reduce the impact of very severe disruption scenarios in the most vulnerable Member States.
Komisija bi morala pri ocenjevanju načrtov preventivnih ukrepov in načrtov za izredne razmere, ki so jih pripravile države članice, imeti tudi možnost, da države članice opozori na cilje energetske unije.
Energy security constitutes one of the objectives of the Energy Union Strategy, as set out in the Commission's communication of 25 February 2015 on a Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy, which also emphasised the ‘energy efficiency first’ principle and the need to fully implement existing Union energy legal acts.
Neovirano delovanje notranjega trga plina je najboljše zagotovilo za zanesljivost oskrbe s plinom po vsej Uniji in zmanjšanje izpostavljenosti posameznih držav članic škodljivim učinkom motenj v oskrbi s plinom.
The communication highlighted the fact that the Energy Union rests on solidarity, enshrined in Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and trust, which are necessary features of energy security.
Kadar je zanesljivost oskrbe s plinom države članice ogrožena, obstaja tveganje, da lahko ukrepi, ki jih je ta država članica pripravila enostransko, ogrozijo pravilno delovanje notranjega trga plina in škodujejo oskrbi odjemalcev s plinom v drugih državah članicah.
This Regulation is intended to boost solidarity and trust between the Member States and put in place the measures needed to achieve those aims.
Da bi lahko notranji trg plina deloval tudi v primeru nezadostne oskrbe, sta potrebni solidarnost in usklajenost kot odgovor na krize v oskrbi, tako pri preventivnih ukrepih kot pri odzivanju na dejanske motnje v oskrbi s plinom.
When assessing the preventive action plans and the emergency plans established by the Member States, the Commission should also be able to draw the attention of the Member States to the objectives of the Energy Union.
Resnično medsebojno povezan notranji energetski trg z več vstopnimi točkami in povratnimi tokovi je mogoče vzpostaviti samo s popolno medsebojno povezavo njegovih plinskih omrežij, izgradnjo terminalov za utekočinjen zemeljski plin (UZP) v južnih in vzhodnih regijah Unije, dokončanjem plinskega koridorja sever-jug in južnega plinskega koridorja ter z nadaljnjim razvojem domače proizvodnje.
An internal gas market that operates smoothly is the best guarantee of the security of gas supply across the Union and to reduce the exposure of individual Member States to the harmful effects of disruptions of gas supply.
Zato je potreben pospešen razvoj medsebojnih povezav in projektov za diverzifikacijo oskrbe, kar je že na prednostnem seznamu evropske strategije za energetsko varnost.
Where a Member State's security of gas supply is threatened, there is a risk that measures developed unilaterally by that Member State may jeopardise the proper functioning of the internal gas market and damage the gas supply to customers in other Member States.
Regionalno sodelovanje omogoča učinkovitejše in cenejše ukrepe, vendar te možnosti doslej še niso bile v celoti izkoriščene.
To allow the internal gas market to function even in the face of a shortage of supply, provision must be made for solidarity and coordination in the response to supply crises, as regards both preventive action and the reaction to actual disruptions of gas supply.
To ni povezano samo z boljšim usklajevanjem nacionalnih blažilnih ukrepov v izrednih razmerah, temveč tudi z nacionalnimi preventivnimi ukrepi, kot so nacionalna skladišča ali politike v zvezi z UZP, ki so lahko strateško pomembni v nekaterih regijah Unije.
A truly interconnected internal energy market with multiple entry points and reverse flows can be created only by fully interconnecting its gas grids, by building up liquefied natural gas (LNG) hubs in the Union's Southern and Eastern regions, by completing the North-South and Southern Gas corridors and by further developing domestic production.
V duhu solidarnosti bi moralo biti regionalno sodelovanje, ki vključuje javne organe in podjetja plinskega gospodarstva, vodilno načelo te uredbe za ublažitev ugotovljenih tveganj in optimizacijo koristi usklajenih ukrepov ter izvajanje stroškovno najučinkovitejših ukrepov za odjemalce v Uniji.
Therefore, an accelerated development of interconnections and projects aiming to diversify supply sources, as already shortlisted in the Energy Security Strategy, is necessary.
Regionalno sodelovanje bi bilo treba postopoma dopolniti z močnejšo perspektivo Unije, ki bi omogočila dostop do vseh razpoložljivih zalog in orodij na celotnem notranjem trgu plina.
So far, the potential for more efficient and less costly measures through regional cooperation has not been fully exploited.
Oceno na ravni Unije glede koridorjev za oskrbo v izrednih razmerah bi bilo treba vključiti v regionalno sodelovanje.
This has to do not only with better coordination of national mitigation actions in emergency situations, but also with national preventive measures, such as national storage or policies related to LNG, which can be strategically important in certain regions of the Union.
Z uporabo pristopa na podlagi tveganja pri ocenjevanju zanesljivosti oskrbe ter določanju preventivnih in blažilnih ukrepov je mogoče uskladiti prizadevanja ter tako bistveno povečati učinkovitost ukrepov in optimizirati vire.
In a spirit of solidarity, regional cooperation, involving both public authorities and natural gas undertakings, should be the guiding principle of this Regulation, to mitigate the identified risks and optimise the benefits of coordinated measures and to implement the most cost-effective measures for Union consumers.
To velja zlasti za ukrepe, namenjene zagotavljanju stalne oskrbe zaščitenih odjemalcev v zelo zahtevnih pogojih, in za ukrepe za ublažitev vpliva izrednih razmer.
Regional cooperation should gradually be complemented with a stronger Union perspective, allowing recourse to all available supplies and tools in the entire internal gas market.
S skupnim ocenjevanjem povezanih tveganj znotraj rizičnih skupin, ki je celovitejše in tudi natančnejše, se bodo države članice bolje pripravile na morebitne krize.
Union-level assessment of the emergency supply corridors should be incorporated into the regional cooperation.
Poleg tega usklajen in vnaprej dogovorjen pristop k zanesljivosti oskrbe v izrednih razmerah zagotavlja dosledno odzivanje in zmanjšuje tveganje negativnih učinkov prelivanja, ki bi jih izključno nacionalni ukrepi lahko imeli v sosednjih državah članicah.
A risk-based approach to assessing the security of supply and establishing preventive and mitigating measures enables efforts to be coordinated and brings significant benefits in terms of the effectiveness of measures and optimisation of resources.
Za namen pristopa na podlagi tveganja bi bilo treba pri opredelitvi rizičnih skupin upoštevati velika čezmejna tveganja za zanesljivost oskrbe s plinom v Uniji.
This applies particularly to measures designed to guarantee a continued supply, under very demanding conditions, to protected customers, and to measures to mitigate the impact of an emergency.
Takšna tveganja so bila opredeljena v sporočilu Komisije z dne 16. oktobra 2014 o kratkoročni odpornosti evropskega sistema oskrbe s plinom in ocene, vključene v zadnji desetletni načrt za razvoj omrežja, ki ga je pripravila Evropska mreža operaterjev prenosnih sistemov za zemeljski plin (ENTSO-G).
Assessing correlated risks jointly in risk groups which is both more comprehensive and more precise, will ensure that Member States are better prepared for any crises.
Za natančnejšo in bolj ciljno usmerjeno oceno bi bilo treba v tej uredbi pri določanju rizičnih skupin upoštevati glavne vire in poti oskrbe s plinom.
Moreover, in an emergency, a coordinated and pre-agreed approach to the security of supply ensures a consistent response and reduces the risk of negative spill-over effects that purely national measures could have in neighbouring Member States.
Za zagotovitev prispevka k skupnim in nacionalnim ocenam tveganja bi moral ENTSO-G v posvetovanju s koordinacijsko skupino za plin (KSP) in Evropsko mrežo operaterjev prenosnih sistemov za električno energijo (ENTSO-E) po vsej Uniji izvesti simulacijo scenarijev motenj v oskrbi s plinom in infrastrukturi.
For the purpose of the risk-based approach, risk groups should be defined based on the major transnational risks to the security of gas supply in the Union.
Tako simulacijo bi bilo treba ponoviti najmanj vsaki dve leti.
Such risks were identified in the Commission's communication of 16 October 2014 on the short-term resilience of the European gas system and the assessment included in the latest Ten-Year Network Development Plan (TYNDP) developed by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSOG).
Da bi okrepili regionalno sodelovanje z zagotavljanjem informacij o pretoku plina ter tehničnega in operativnega strokovnega znanja, bi bilo treba v izvajanje simulacij vključiti sistem regionalnega sodelovanja na področju plina, ki ga je oblikoval ENTSO-G in ga sestavljajo stalne strokovne skupine.
To allow for a more precise and better focused assessment for the purposes of this Regulation, the risk groups should be composed on the basis of the main gas supply sources and routes.
ENTSO-G bi moral zagotoviti ustrezno raven preglednosti in dostop do predpostavk za modeliranje, uporabljenih v njegovih scenarijih.
To provide input to the common and national risk assessments, ENTSOG, in consultation with the Gas Coordination Group (GCG) and with the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E), should carry out a Union-wide simulation of gas supply and infrastructure disruption scenarios.
Na Komisijo bi bilo treba prenesti pooblastilo, da z delegiranim aktom posodablja sestavo rizičnih skupin na podlagi razvoja velikih čezmejnih tveganj za zanesljivost oskrbe s plinom v Uniji in njenega vpliva na države članice ob upoštevanju rezultata simulacije, izvedene po vsej Uniji, in razprave v KSP.
Such a simulation should be repeated at least every two years.
Da bi bilo regionalno sodelovanje dejansko izvedljivo, bi se morale države članice znotraj vsake rizične skupine dogovoriti o mehanizmu sodelovanja.
As a means of strengthening regional cooperation by providing information about gas flows as well as providing technical and operational expertise, the Regional Coordination System for Gas (ReCo System for Gas), established by ENTSOG and composed of standing expert groups, should be involved in carrying out simulations.
Tak mehanizem bi bilo treba oblikovati dovolj zgodaj, da se lahko izvede skupna ocena tveganja, obravnavajo ustrezni in učinkoviti čezmejni ukrepi, za katere bo potrebno soglasje vsake zadevne države članice, in sprejme dogovor o njih ter da se ti ukrepi po posvetovanju s Komisijo nato vključijo v tista poglavja v načrtih preventivnih ukrepov in načrtih za izredne razmere, ki se nanašajo na regije.
ENTSOG should ensure an appropriate level of transparency and access to the modelling assumptions used in its scenarios.
Države članice se lahko same dogovorijo o mehanizmu sodelovanja, ki je najprimernejši za posamezno rizično skupino.
The Commission should be empowered to update the composition of the risk groups by means of a delegated act based on the evolution of the major transnational risks to the security of gas supply in the Union and its impact on Member States, taking into account the result of the Union-wide simulation and the discussion within the GCG.
Moralo bi biti mogoče, da ima Komisija podporno vlogo v celotnem procesu in izmenjuje najboljše prakse za urejevanje regionalnega sodelovanja, kot je na primer usklajevalna vloga po načelu rotacije v rizičnih skupinah za pripravo različnih dokumentov ali ustanovitev namenskih organov.
In order to make the regional cooperation feasible, Member States should agree on a cooperation mechanism within each risk group.
Če se dogovor o mehanizmu sodelovanja ne doseže, bi morala Komisija predlagati ustrezne mehanizme sodelovanja za določeno rizično skupino.
Such a mechanism should be developed sufficiently in time to allow for conducting the common risk assessment and discussing and agreeing on appropriate and effective cross-border measures, which will require the agreement of each Member State concerned, to be included in the regional chapters of the preventive action plans and the emergency plans, after consulting the Commission.
Pristojni organi bi morali ob izvedbi skupne ocene tveganja oceniti vse relevantne dejavnike tveganja, ki bi lahko privedli do uresničitve velikega čezmejnega tveganja, za katerega je bila rizična skupina oblikovana, vključno z motnjami v oskrbi s plinom s strani posameznega največjega dobavitelja.
Member States are free to agree on a cooperation mechanism best suited to a given risk group.
Na te dejavnike tveganja bi se bilo treba odzvati z ustreznimi čezmejnimi ukrepi, o katerih se dogovorijo pristojni organi zadevnih držav članic.
The Commission should be able to have a facilitating role in the overall process and share best practices for arranging regional cooperation such as a rotating coordination role within the risk groups for the preparation of the different documents or establishing dedicated bodies.
Čezmejne ukrepe bi bilo treba vključiti v tista poglavja v načrtih preventivnih ukrepov in načrtih za izredne razmere, ki se nanašajo na regije.
In the absence of an agreement on the cooperation mechanism, the Commission should propose a suitable cooperation mechanism for a given risk group.
Rezultati skupnih in nacionalnih ocen tveganja bi morali biti upoštevani tudi v ocenah vseh nevarnosti, določenih v členu 6 Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9], in v celoti upoštevani v nacionalnih ocenah tveganja.