natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, the Commission considers that the exporting producer failed to prove that the tax not paid on export sales was included in the domestic price.
To je bilo potrjeno tudi v uvodnih izjavah 59 do 62 vzporedne protisubvencijske preiskave, kjer je bilo ugotovljeno, da shema AAS pomeni subvencijo v obliki finančnega prispevka indijske vlade ter je ni mogoče šteti za dovoljeni sistem povračil dajatev ali sistem nadomestnega povračila.
This was also confirmed in recitals (59) to (62) of the parallel anti-subsidy investigation where it was established that the AAS constitutes a subsidy in the form of a financial contribution by the Government of India and cannot be considered a permissible duty drawback system or substitution drawback system.
Zato te prilagoditve ni mogoče odobriti.
Therefore this adjustment cannot be granted.
Stopnja dampinga
Dumping margin
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost glede na vrsto primerjana s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste izdelka, ki se pregleduje.
As provided for under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value by type was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product under review.
Na podlagi te metodologije stopnja dampinga sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v OPP znaša 29,8 %.
Based on this methodology, the dumping margin established for the cooperating exporting producer amounts to 29,8 % during the RIP.
Med preverjanjem na kraju samem v prostorih edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v Indiji je družba trdila, da bi bilo treba upoštevati domnevno precejšnje nihanje cene glavne surovine (igelnega koksa) v OPP, in zahtevala, naj Komisija v ta namen izračuna četrtletno stopnjo dampinga.
During the on-spot verification at the sole cooperating exporting producer's premises in India, the company claimed that the allegedly significant fluctuation of the price of the main raw material (needle coke) during the RIP should be taken into consideration and requested that the Commission would calculate for this purpose a quarterly dumping margin.
To bi pokazalo, da v OPP ni bilo dampinga.
This would show that there was no dumping during the RIP.
V zvezi s tem je družba ob koncu preverjanja na kraju samem predložila četrtletne stroške proizvodnje.
In this regard, the company submitted the quarterly cost of production (‘COP’) at the end of the on-spot verification.
Ker ta trditev ni bila izražena v zgodnejši fazi postopka niti v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, Komisija trditve ni mogla ustrezno preveriti in ugotoviti, ali so bili predloženi podatki popolni in pravilni.
Given that such claim was not raised at an earlier stage of the proceeding nor in the questionnaire reply, the Commission was not in a position to properly verify this claim and could thus not establish whether the data provided were complete and accurate.
V vsakem primeru je preiskava na kraju samem na podlagi zagotovljenih podatkov pokazala, da so se stroški proizvodnje na enoto na vrsto izdelka v OPP iz četrtletja v četrtletje zniževali, vendar ne za vse izdelke, ampak samo za nekatere.
In any event, on the basis of the data provided during the on-spot verification, it was established that the unit COP per type of product showed a decreasing trend during the RIP from quarter to quarter for some product types, but not for all.
Za več številčnih oznak izdelka so se stroški proizvodnje na enoto v zadnjem četrtletju zvišali.
For several PCNs the unit COP increased in the last quarter.
Izvozna cena na enoto je imela podoben padajoč trend, razen v zadnjem četrtletju, ko so se izvozne cene zvišale, razen za dve vrsti izdelka.
The unit export price had a similar decreasing trend with the exception of the last quarter during which export prices increased except for two product types.
Družba je v vsakem četrtletju OPP izvozila znatne količine, ki so bile porazdeljene po različnih četrtletjih, kot je prikazano v spodnji preglednici (točnih podatkov o obsegu zaradi zaupnosti ni mogoče razkriti).
The company exported significant volumes in each quarter of the RIP which were distributed over the different quarters as shown in the table below (the precise volume data cannot be disclosed due to confidentiality reasons).
Poleg tega se niso vse vrste izdelka prodajale v vseh četrtletjih, saj se je samo šest od 23 vrst izdelka, ki jih je sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik prodajal na trgu Unije, prodajalo v vsakem četrtletju.
In addition, not all product types were sold in all quarters, out of the 23 product types sold by the cooperating exporter producer to the Union market, only six of them were sold in each quarter.
Stopnja dampinga, izračunana za vsako četrtletje v skladu z metodologijo, pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 29 do 47, je pokazala znaten damping v vsakem četrtletju OPP.
(51 ) The dumping margins calculated for each quarter according to the methodology explained in recitals (29) to (47) showed significant dumping in each quarter of the RIP.
Preglednica 1
RIP
Stopnja dampinga (%)
Dumping margin (%)
Obseg izvoza (v tonah)
Volume of exports (tonnes)
Oktober 2014–december 2014
October 2014 – December 2014
[1500–1700]
[1500 – 1700]
Januar 2015–marec 2015
January 2015 – March 2015
[1900–2100]
[1900 – 2100]
April 2015–junij 2015
April 2015 – June 2015
Julij 2015–september 2015
July 2015 – September 2015
[1100–1400]
[1100 – 1400]
Trditev sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, da bi četrtletni izračun njegove stopnje dampinga pokazal, da dampinga ni bilo, je torej nepravilna.
The claim of the cooperating exporting producer that a calculation of its dumping margin on a quarterly basis would result in no dumping was therefore incorrect.
Stopnje dampinga so bile znatne v vsakem četrtletju, enako pa je tudi povprečna stopnja dampinga v OPP, izračunana na podlagi teh četrtletnih stopenj, ostala znatna in znašala 19,3 %.
The dumping margins were significant in each quarter and likewise the average dumping margin during the RIP calculated on the basis of these quarterly margins remained at a significant level, i.e. at 19,3 %.
Čeprav stopnje dampinga v različnih četrtletjih, izračunane na podlagi vrste izdelka, kažejo nihajoč trend (zviševanje v obdobju od oktobra 2014–decembra 2014 do januarja 2015–marca 2015 ter nato zniževanje v obdobju od januarja 2015–marca 2015 do konca OPP), postopno zniževanje proizvodnih stroškov na enoto ni imelo zatrjevanega učinka.
While the dumping margins in the different quarters calculated on a product type basis show a fluctuating trend (increasing between October 2014 — December 2014 to January 2015 — March 2015 and then decreasing between January 2015 — March 2015 till the end of the RIP), the gradual decrease of the COP during the RIP did not have the claimed impact.
Dejansko je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo zmanjšanje stopnje dampinga delno posledica zvišanja izvozne cene.
In fact, it is noted that the decrease in the dumping margin was also in part due to an increase in the export price.
Opozoriti je treba, da je zahtevek sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika za izračun četrtletne stopnje dampinga temeljil le na nihanjih cen surovin.
It is recalled that the claim of the cooperating exporting producer for a quarterly dumping margin was only based on the fluctuations of the price of the raw materials.
Zato je Komisija sklenila, da predložene informacije niso postavile pod vprašaj ugotovitev glede dampinga v OPP in posledično ugotovitev o nadaljevanju dampinga iz uvodnih izjav 57 do 87.
Therefore, the Commission concluded that the information provided did not put into question the findings of dumping during the RIP and consequently the findings of continuation of dumping in recitals (57) to (87).
Poleg tega je trdil, da se samo izdelki, ki se proizvajajo iz uvoženega igelnega koksa in se uporabljajo v visokozmogljivih električnih obločnih pečeh, prodajajo na trgu Unije in da bi bilo treba zato dobičkonosnost, uporabljeno za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti, izračunati samo na podlagi teh vrst izdelka.
It furthermore claimed that only the products manufactured from imported needle coke, which are used in the high power electric arc furnace, are sold in the Union market and that the profitability used to construct the normal value should therefore be calculated only on basis of these types of products.
V izpolnjenem vprašalniku je družba HEG za vsako vrsto izdelka navedla poreklo surovin in učinkovitost GES.
During a hearing held with the Commission following disclosure, HEG elaborated that, on the basis of these claims, for constructing the normal value the Commission should not use a weighted average profitability rate calculated based on all domestic sales.
Vendar je ob upoštevanju samo teh dveh elementov primerjava med vrstami izdelka, ki se prodajajo na trgu Unije, in tistimi, ki se prodajajo na indijskem trgu, pokazala, da je družba HEG v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom prodajala iste vrste izdelka na obeh trgih.
HEG argued that the Commission should calculate two separate profitability rates taking into account the origin of the coke, and apply it accordingly in the construction of the normal value.
Zato je prvi del trditve dejansko napačen.
In the reply to the questionnaire, HEG reported for each product type the origin of the raw material and the performance of GES.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 39 in 40, je poleg tega Komisija za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti uporabila tehtani povprečni dobiček celotne domače prodaje podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe.
However, when taking only these two elements into account, the comparison between the product types sold in the Union market and the ones sold in the Indian market showed that HEG sold the same product types in both markets during the review investigation period.
Vendar bi se v primeru uporabe posameznih stopenj dobička za vsako vrsto izdelka, kot jih je družba predložila med zaslišanjem, omenjenem v uvodni izjavi 54, stopnja dampinga, navedena v uvodni izjavi 47, zmanjšala le za 3,2 odstotne točke, tj. na 26,7 %.
Therefore, the first part of the claim is factually wrong.
Zato to zmanjšanje ne vpliva bistveno na ugotovitve Komisije glede dampinga v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom in posledično na ugotovitve o nadaljevanju dampinga iz uvodnih izjav 57 do 87.
In addition, as explained in recitals (39) and (40), for constructing the normal value, the Commission used the weighted average profit of all domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the review investigation period pursuant to Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Razvoj uvoza v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov
Nevertheless, using the individual profit rates for each type of product as submitted by the company during the hearing mentioned in recital (54), the dumping margin stated in recital (47) would only decrease by 3,2 percentage points to 26,7 %.
Poleg ugotovitve znatnega dampinga v OPP je Komisija analizirala, ali obstaja verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga v primeru izteka ukrepov.
Therefore, this decrease does not have a material impact on the Commission's findings of dumping during the review investigation period and consequently the findings of continuation of dumping in recitals (57) to (87).
Proučeni so bili proizvodna zmogljivost in prosta zmogljivost v Indiji, izvoz iz Indije v druge tretje države in privlačnost trga Unije.
Development of imports should measures be repealed
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 25, je sodeloval le eden proizvajalec izvoznik v Indiji, ki je obsegal le polovico skupne indijske proizvodne zmogljivosti.
Further to the finding of significant dumping during the RIP, the Commission analysed whether there was a likelihood of a continuation of dumping should the measures be allowed to lapse.
Ugotovitve v oddelkih v nadaljevanju so zato temeljile na dostopnih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
The following elements were analysed: the production capacity and spare capacity in India, the exports from India to other third countries and the attractiveness of the Union market.
Za ta namen je Komisija uporabila informacije, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa, zbirko podatkov Združenih narodov, informacije, ki jih je zagotovila indijska vlada v vzporedni protisubvencijski preiskavi, navedeni v uvodni izjavi 10, in javno dostopne informacije.
As mentioned in recital (25), only one exporting producer in India cooperated which represented only half of the total Indian production capacity.
Proizvodna zmogljivost in prosta zmogljivost
The findings in the sections below were therefore based on facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi javnih finančnih informacij in preverjenih podatkov sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika [12] [13], sta oba indijska proizvajalca po prejšnjem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov, navedenem v uvodni izjavi 4, svojo proizvodno zmogljivost povečala za 27 %.
In this regard, the Commission used the information provided by the cooperating exporting producer, the request for the expiry review, the United Nation Database, information provided by the government of India (GOI) in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation mentioned in recital (10) and publicly available information.
Ob koncu OPP je skupna proizvodna zmogljivost v Indiji znašala 160000 ton letno, enakomerno porazdeljenih med obema proizvajalcema [14].
Production capacity and spare capacity
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da bosta indijska proizvajalca izvoznika v primeru večjega povpraševanja verjetno še dodatno povečala svojo zmogljivost [15].
Based on public financial information and verified data of the cooperating exporting producer [12] [13], both Indian producers increased their production capacity after the previous expiry review mentioned in recital (4) by 27 %.
Obseg proizvodnje obeh indijskih proizvajalcev je v OPP znašal med 110000 in 120000 tonami.
At the end of the RIP, the total production capacity in India amounted to 160000 tonnes per year, equally divided between the two producers [14].
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je skupna indijska prosta zmogljivost znašala od 40000 do 50000 ton, kar je pomenilo od 29 % do 36 % potrošnje Unije v OPP.
In addition, the investigation revealed that the Indian exporting producers are likely to further increase their capacity in case of increased demand [15].
Zmogljivost se je povečala hkrati z zmanjšanjem potrošnje GES v Indiji in po svetu.
The production volume of the two Indian producers ranged between 110000 and 120000 tonnes during the RIP.
GES se uporabljajo predvsem v elektro-jeklarski industriji, natančneje v jeklarnah za taljenje jeklenih odpadkov.
On the basis of the above, the total Indian spare capacity was estimated to between 40000 and 50000 tonnes, which represented between 29 % and 36 % of the Union consumption during the RIP.
Razvoj potrošnje GES je torej povezan z razvojem elektro-jeklarske proizvodnje in sledi podobnim trendom.
The increase in capacity took place in parallel to a decrease in consumption of GES in India and worldwide.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je proizvodnja elektrojekla v Indiji in po svetu med letom 2012 in OPP zmanjšala [16], medtem ko se je proizvodna zmogljivost za GES v Indiji povečala.
GES is mainly used in the electric steel industry, more specifically it is used in steel plants to melt steel scrap.
Konec novembra 2014 so indijski organi uvedli protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz GES iz Kitajske [17].
The development of GES consumption is therefore correlated with the development of electric steel production and follows similar trends.
Pričakuje se, da bodo indijski proizvajalci povečali svoj tržni delež na domačem trgu.
The investigation established that the production of electric steel in India and worldwide decreased between 2012 and the RIP [16] while the production capacity of GES in India increased.
Izvoz v tretje države
At the end of November 2014, the Indian authorities imposed anti-dumping measures on imports of GES from China [17].
Na podlagi javnih računovodskih izkazov je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta oba indijska proizvajalca izvoznika izvozno usmerjena [18] [19] saj sta v OPP izvozila približno 60 % skupne proizvodnje.
It is expected that the Indian producers will increase their market share on the domestic market.
Unija je kljub veljavnim ukrepom ostala pomemben namembni kraj za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika HEG.
Exports to third countries
Izvoz HEG je v OPP prispeval od 10 % do 17 % skupne prodaje družbe v smislu vrednosti in od 10 % do 20 % v smislu obsega.
Based on public financial statements, both Indian exporting producers were found to be export-oriented [18] [19] exporting around 60 % of their total production during the RIP.
Nesodelujoča indijska družba GIL je v OPP v Unijo izvozila zelo majhne količine.
The Union remained an important export destination for the cooperating exporting producer HEG despite the measures in force.
Vendar je to treba obravnavati v povezavi s protidampinškimi in izravnalnimi dajatvami, ki veljajo za družbo GIL (skupaj 15,7 %) v primerjavi z družbo HEG (skupaj 7 %).
HEG's exports accounted for between 10 % and 17 % of its total sales in terms of value and between 10 % and 20 % in terms of volume in the RIP.
Ker ni bilo nobenega drugega zanesljivejšega vira za ugotovitev obsega izvoza iz Indije na trge drugih tretjih držav, je bila uporabljena zbirka podatkov Združenih narodov.
The non-cooperating Indian company GIL exported very low volumes to the Union during the RIP.
V obdobju 2012–2015 se je indijski izvoz v nekatere od teh držav povečal (na primer v Saudovo Arabijo, Združene arabske emirate in ZDA), v nekatere druge pa zmanjšal (Iran, Turčija, Republika Koreja in Egipt), in sicer na splošno za 9 %.
This has however to be seen in correlation with the anti-dumping and countervailing duties applicable to GIL (15,7 % in total) as compared to HEG (7 % in total).
Čeprav je bila Rusija leta 2012 tretji največji izvozni trg za indijske proizvajalce glede na obseg, se je izvoz iz Indije v Rusijo, potem ko je Rusija decembra 2012 uvedla dajatev ad valorem na uvoz GES iz Indije v višini od 16,04 % do 32,83 % [20], zmanjšal za 86 % s 4415 ton na 638 ton leta 2015.
In the absence of any other more reliable source to establish export volumes from India to other third country markets, the United Nations Database was used.
Informacije o obsegu izvoza v zbirki podatkov Združenih narodov je bilo mogoče dvojno preveriti z informacijami, ki jih je indijska vlada zagotovila v vzporedni protisubvencijski preiskavi, tj. s statističnimi podatki o izvozu Generalnega direktorata za trgovinske podatke in statistiko („DGCIS“), ki so pokazali podobne trende kot podatki v zbirki podatkov Združenih narodov.
The main destinations for the Indian exports in 2015 were USA, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey and United Arab Emirates, Republic of Korea, Egypt.
Kar zadeva ravni izvoznih cen, je preiskava na podlagi zbirke podatkov Združenih narodov pokazala, da so se indijske izvozne cene za nekatere države, kot so ZDA in Republika Koreja, ki so bile v obdobju 2012–2014 v povprečju nižje od cen v EU, leta 2015 zvišale približno na raven cen v EU.
Between 2012 and 2015 Indian exports to some of these destinations increased (such as Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, USA) while to some others (Iran, Turkey, Republic of Korea, Egypt) they decreased, with and overall decrease of 9 %.
Poleg tega so se indijske izvozne cene za druge države, kot je na primer Saudova Arabija, ki so bile v obdobju 2012–2014 nižje od cen v EU, leta 2015 zvišale na raven, ki je bila višja od cen v EU.
While in 2012 Russia was the third export market for the Indian producers in terms of volume, after Russia imposed an ad valorem duty on imports of GES from India ranging from 16,04 % to 32,83 % in December 2012 [20] the exports from India to Russia dropped from 4415 tonnes to 638 tonnes in 2015, a decrease of 86 %.
Poleg tega so bile indijske izvozne cene za nekatere druge države, kot je na primer Turčija, v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju še vedno nižje od cen v EU.
The information on export volumes in the United Nations Database could be counter-checked with the information provided by the GOI in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation, i.e. export statistics of the Directorate-General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics (‘DGCIS’), which showed similar trends as the ones observed in the United Nations Database.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da cene v tej zbirki podatkov niso ločene po različnih vrstah izdelka in da je zato zanesljivost take primerjave cen na tej podlagi omejena.
In addition, export volumes to other third countries of the cooperating exporting producer HEG also followed similar trends, i.e. an increase of export volumes to other third countries from 2012 to 2013 and a decrease from 2014 to the RIP with an overall decreasing trend during the period considered.
Analiza informacij o izvoznih cenah sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov za trge drugih tretjih držav je pokazala, da so bile v obdobju 2012–2014 povprečne cene na trgu Unije višje od povprečnih cen družbe HEG na drugih tretjih trgih (prilagojenih na podlagi koledarskega leta, saj so bili podatki predloženi za poslovno leto), medtem ko so bile v OPP povprečne cene na trgu Unije nižje od povprečnih cen družbe HEG na drugih tretjih trgih.
To be noted that despite this decrease of export volumes, the overall level in the RIP remained significant, between 20000 tonnes and 30000 tonnes.
Za ugotovitev natančnih ravni cen indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov za trge drugih tretjih držav ni bilo na voljo drugih podatkov.
Regarding export price levels, based on the United Nations Database the investigation revealed that Indian export prices to certain countries like the USA and the Republic of Korea that used to be on average lower than the prices in EU between 2012 and 2014 have increased in 2015 at around the same level as the prices in the EU.
Privlačnost trga Unije
In addition, Indian export prices to other countries, like Saudi Arabia for instance, that were lower than the prices in EU between 2012 and 2014, increased at a higher level than the EU prices in 2015.
Privlačnost trga Unije je bila dokazana z dejstvom, da so indijske GES kljub veljavnim protidampinškim in izravnalnim dajatvam še naprej vstopale na trg Unije.
Moreover, Indian exports to certain other countries, like Turkey for instance, continued to be lower than the EU prices during the whole period considered.
Indija je med obravnavanim obdobjem ostala druga največja država izvoznica v Unijo, takoj za Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko („Kitajska“).
To be noted however that the prices in this database do not distinguish between different product types and therefore the reliability of such a price comparison on this basis is limited.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 100 v nadaljevanju, je Indija kljub zmanjšanju med letom 2012 in OPP ohranila znaten obseg in tržne deleže izvoza v Unijo.
The analysis of the information on export prices to other third country markets of the cooperating exporting producer showed that during 2012 and 2014 the average prices in the Union market were higher than the average prices of HEG on other third markets (adjusted on a calendar year basis as data were provided on a financial year basis) while during the RIP the average prices in the Union market were lower than the average prices of HEG on other third markets.
Če bi bili ukrepi Unije razveljavljeni in dostop do trga Unije mogoč brez protidampinških in izravnalnih dajatev, je tako dejansko verjetno, da bodo proste proizvodne zmogljivosti uporabljene za izvoz na trg Unije.
No other data were available to establish accurate price levels of the Indian exporting producers to other third country markets.
Preiskava je zlasti pokazala, da se je celotni izvoz iz Indije na trge drugih tretjih držav zmanjševal, čeprav se je indijski izvoz na nekaterih izvoznih trgih (kot so Saudova Arabija, Združeni arabski emirati in ZDA) leta 2015 povečal.
Attractiveness of the Union market
To kaže, da imajo nekatere tretje države očitno omejeno zmogljivost za absorpcijo dodatnih količin izvoza.