natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission, EASA and the competent authorities of the Member States have over the past six months continued to closely monitor the safety performance of air carriers certified in Russia and operating within the Union, including through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on certain Russian air carriers in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Namen sestanka je bil, da se na podlagi poročil o preverjanju varnosti na ploščadi v obdobju med 11. marcem 2016 in 10. marcem 2017 preveri varnost letalskih prevoznikov, certificiranih v Rusiji, ter ugotovi, ali obstajajo primeri, pri katerih je treba okrepiti dejavnosti nadzora FATA.
On 17 March 2017, representatives of the Commission, EASA and a Member State met with representatives of the Russian Federal Air Transport Agency (‘FATA’).
Komisija je na navedenem sestanku podrobneje pregledala izide preverjanj na ploščadi v programu SAFA za šest letalskih prevoznikov, certificiranih v Rusiji.
The purpose of the meeting was to review the safety performance of air carriers certified in Russia on the basis of ramp inspection reports for the period between 11 March 2016 and 10 March 2017 and to identify cases where oversight activities by the FATA have to be strengthened.
Čeprav niso bili odkriti nobeni varnostni pomisleki, je FATA Komisijo obvestila, da se bodo zaradi omejenega števila preverjanj, opravljenih pri nekaterih letalskih prevoznikih, v naslednjem četrtletju izvedla dodatna preverjanja pri dveh od navedenih prevoznikov.
During that meeting, the Commission reviewed the SAFA ramp inspection results of six air carriers certified in Russia in more detail.
Na podlagi trenutno razpoložljivih informacij, vključno z informacijami, ki jih je FATA predložila na tehničnem posvetovalnem sestanku 17. marca 2017, se ocenjuje, da je FATA trenutno zmožna in pripravljena odpraviti pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti.
While no safety concerns were identified, the FATA informed the Commission that, because of the limited number of inspections carried out on some air carriers, additional inspections will be performed during the next quarter on two of those air carriers.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija sklenila, da ugovor ruskih letalskih organov ali letalskih prevoznikov, certificiranih v Rusiji, pred njo in Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu ni potreben.
Based on the information currently available, including the information provided by the FATA at the technical consultation meeting of 17 March 2017, it is assessed that there is currently no lack of ability nor a lack of willingness on the part of the FATA to address safety deficiencies.
Zato Komisija v skladu s skupnimi merili iz Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2111/2005 ocenjuje, da trenutno ni razlogov za spremembo seznama letalskih prevoznikov, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Uniji, z vključitvijo letalskih prevoznikov iz Rusije.
On those grounds, the Commission concluded that a hearing before the Commission and the Air Safety Committee of the Russian aviation authorities or of any air carriers certified in Russia was not necessary.
Države članice morajo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 965/2012 še naprej preverjati dejansko izpolnjevanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov s prednostno razvrstitvijo preverjanj na ploščadi, ki jih je treba opraviti na zrakoplovih letalskih prevoznikov, certificiranih v Rusiji.
In accordance with the common criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the Commission therefore considers that, at this time, there are no grounds for amending the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union to include air carriers from Russia.
Če se pri navedenih preverjanjih izkaže, da obstajajo neposredna varnostna tveganja, ki so posledica neizpolnjevanja ustreznih varnostnih standardov, bo Komisija morda morala sprejeti ukrepe proti letalskim prevoznikom iz Rusije v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2111/2005.
Member States are to continue to verify effective compliance with relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on air carriers certified in Russia, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Letalski prevozniki s Saint Vincenta in Grenadin
Should those inspections point to an imminent safety risk as a consequence of non-compliance with the relevant safety standards, the Commission may be obliged to take action against air carriers from Russia, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Letalski prevoznik Mustique Airways, registriran na Saint Vincentu in Grenadinah, je 16. aprila 2015 pri EASA zaprosil za pridobitev dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države.
Air carriers from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
EASA je vlogo ocenila v skladu z zahtevami iz Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 452/2014 in izrazila veliko zaskrbljenost, ker letalski prevoznik Mustique Airways ni uspel dokazati skladnosti z veljavnimi zahtevami iz člena 3 Uredbe (EU) št. 452/2014.
On 16 April 2015, the air carrier Mustique Airways, registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, applied to EASA for a TCO authorisation.
Zato je sklenila, da se prevozniku Mustique Airways na podlagi nadaljnje ocene ne bi izdalo dovoljenje operatorja iz tretje države, ker ni izpolnil navedenih zahtev.
EASA assessed that application in accordance with the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 452/2014 and raised fundamental concerns regarding the failure by Mustique Airways to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 452/2014.
Posledično je 4. oktobra 2016 iz varnostnih razlogov zavrnila vlogo.
EASA therefore concluded that further assessment would not result in the issuing of a TCO authorisation to Mustique Airways because it did not meet those requirements.
Komisija je 30. januarja 2017 pristojni organ Saint Vincenta in Grenadin, tj. vzhodnokaribski organ za civilno letalstvo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ECCAA), zaprosila za informacije o ukrepih, ki so bili sprejeti po tem, ko je EASA zavrnila vlogo prevoznika Mustique Airways za pridobitev dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države.
Therefore, on 4 October 2016, EASA rejected the application on safety grounds.
ECCAA je 24. februarja 2017 Komisijo obvestil, da je prevoznik Mustique Airways 2. februarja 2017 pri EASA ponovno zaprosil za pridobitev dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države, ker naj bi bili po navedbah tega prevoznika varnostni pomisleki, zaradi katerih je bila izdaja dovoljenja zavrnjena, zadovoljivo odpravljeni.
On 30 January 2017, the Commission requested information from the competent authority of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, the Eastern Caribbean Civil Aviation Authority (‘ECCAA’), on the measures taken following EASA's rejection of the TCO application made by Mustique Airways.
Ker prevoznik Mustique Airways in ECCAA nista predložila nobenih dokazov, da so bili varnostni pomisleki, izraženi na podlagi ocene varnosti v okviru pridobitve dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države, ki jo je izvedla EASA, dejansko odpravljeni, je bil ECCAA in prevozniku Mustique Airways 26. aprila 2017 omogočen ugovor pred Komisijo in Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005.
On 24 February 2017, the ECCAA informed the Commission that Mustique Airways had re-applied to EASA for a TCO authorisation on 2 February 2017, on the grounds that, according to Mustique Airways, the safety concerns that led to the rejection by EASA would have been resolved in a satisfactory manner.
Organ se ni odzval na vabilo na ugovor in se ga ni udeležil.
Since neither Mustique Airways nor the ECCAA provided any evidence that the safety concerns resulting from the TCO safety assessment by EASA had indeed been resolved, both the ECCAA and Mustique Airways were given the opportunity to be heard on 26 April 2017 by the Commission and the Air Safety Committee in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
ECCAA prav tako ni predložil informacij o sprejetih ukrepih v zvezi z ugotovitvami ocene v okviru pridobitve dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države glede prevoznika Mustique Airways ali informacij o svojih dejavnostih nadzora.
The authority did not respond to the invitation to be heard and did not participate in the hearing.
EASA in prevoznik Mustique Airways sta se 24. aprila 2017 sestala na tehničnem sestanku, na katerem sta razpravljala o ponovni vložitvi vloge letalskega prevoznika.
Equally, the ECCAA did not provide information on the measures taken on the TCO findings with regard to Mustique Airways or on its oversight activities.
Ker je od tega sestanka do ugovora preteklo malo časa, EASA ni mogla v celoti oceniti ponovne vloge.
On 24 April 2017 EASA held a technical meeting with Mustique Airways to discuss its re-application.
Vendar je lahko Komisiji in Odboru za varnost v zračnem prometu potrdila, da so glavni temeljni vzroki za resne in ponavljajoče se pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti, ki jih je EASA ugotovila pri prvi oceni v okviru pridobitve dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države, še vedno prisotni.
In view of the short time span between this meeting and the hearing, it was not possible for EASA to conduct a full assessment of the re-application.
Prevoznik Mustique Airways je med ugovorom 26. aprila 2017 predložil informacije o svojem poslovanju in objektih ter le omejene informacije o varnostnih vidikih.
However, EASA was in a position to confirm to the Commission and the Air Safety Committee that the main root causes that led to the serious and repetitive safety deficiencies which EASA had identified during the first TCO assessment, remain present.
Informacije o njegovem napredku pri razvoju sistemov upravljanja varnosti in kakovosti, ki jih je predložil, so pokazale, da sistema nista dovolj razvita.
During the hearing on 26 April 2017, Mustique Airways provided information on the company's business and facilities, and only to a limited extent on safety-related aspects.
Medtem ko je bila pozdravljena pripravljenost letalskega prevoznika Mustique Airways za sodelovanje v učinkovitejšem dialogu z EASA o ponovni vložitvi vloge za pridobitev dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države, je bilo ugotovljeno, da manjkajo bistveni varnostni elementi, kot je osnovni sistem upravljanja varnosti.
The information provided by Mustique Airways on the progress it has made in relation to the development of its safety and quality management systems indicated that these are insufficiently developed.
Poleg tega je prevoznik Mustique Airways pokazal jasno pomanjkanje zavedanja in razumevanja resnosti ugotovitev EASA.
While welcoming the readiness of Mustique Airways to engage in a more effective dialogue with EASA on the re-application by Mustique Airways for a TCO authorisation, it was found that essential safety elements, such as a basic safety management system, are not present.
Postalo je jasno, da je varnostna kultura letalskega prevoznika reaktivna in ne proaktivna.
Moreover, Mustique Airways showed a lack of awareness and comprehension of the seriousness of the findings raised by EASA.
Iz trenutno razpoložljivih informacij, vključno z informacijami, ki jih je EASA zagotovila v okviru obravnave zavrnjene vloge prevoznika Mustique Airways za pridobitev dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države in v okviru tekoče obravnave ponovne vloge, ter vsemi informacijami, ki jih je predložil navedeni prevoznik, je razvidno, da obstajajo dokazi o resnih pomanjkljivostih glede varnosti na strani prevoznika Mustique Airways.
Finally, it became clear that the safety culture at the air carrier is of a re-active nature rather than of a pro-active nature.
Ta letalski prevoznik trenutno ni zmožen ustrezno odpraviti pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti.
The information available at present, including the information provided by EASA in the framework of the rejected TCO application of Mustique Airways, and in the framework of the on-going re-application, as well as all information provided by the air carrier Mustique Airways, shows that there is evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Mustique Airways.
Večina njegovih varnostnih ukrepov je dejansko v fazi razvoja, načrt korektivnih ukrepov, ki ga je predložil v odgovor na ugotovitve ocene varnosti v okviru pridobitve dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države, pa ni dovolj zanesljiv, zlasti kar zadeva potrebno analizo temeljnih vzrokov.
Mustique Airways is at present not sufficiently able to address its safety deficiencies.
Zato Komisija v skladu s skupnimi merili iz Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2111/2005 ocenjuje, da bi bilo treba seznam letalskih prevoznikov, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Uniji, spremeniti tako, da se v Prilogo A k Uredbi (ES) št. 474/2006 vključi letalski prevoznik Mustique Airways.
In fact, its ongoing safety actions are largely in the development stage, and the corrective action plan which Mustique Airways presented in response to the findings identified during the TCO safety assessment is not robust enough, in particular with regard to the necessary root cause analysis.
Države članice morajo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 965/2012 še naprej preverjati dejansko izpolnjevanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov s prednostno razvrstitvijo preverjanj na ploščadi, ki jih je treba opraviti na zrakoplovih letalskih prevoznikov, certificiranih na Saint Vincentu in Grenadinah.
In accordance with the common criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the Commission therefore considers that the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union should be amended to include the air carrier Mustique Airways in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 474/2006.
Letalski prevozniki s Tajske
Member States are to continue to verify the effective compliance with relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on air carriers certified in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Tehnični posvetovalni sestanek med Komisijo, EASA in tajskim organom za civilno letalstvo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CAAT) je potekal 17. marca 2017.
Air carriers from Thailand
Na navedenem sestanku je CAAT Komisijo seznanil z napredkom, doseženim od septembra 2016, zlasti v zvezi s sistemom zračnega prometa na Tajskem, časovnim načrtom CAAT za usklajevanje in trenutnim stanjem izvajanja svojega načrta korektivnih ukrepov.
On 17 March 2017, a technical consultation meeting was held between the Commission, EASA and the Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand (‘CAAT’).
Glavni elementi napredka vključujejo novi tajski zakon o civilnem letalstvu, ki bo predvidoma začel veljati v zadnjem četrtletju leta 2017, spremembo predpisov CAAT, njegovo posodobljeno organizacijo, trajnostne mehanizme financiranja ter izboljšani program zaposlovanja in usposabljanja za njegove inšpektorje.
During that meeting, the CAAT updated the Commission on the progress made since September 2016, in particular as regards the air transport system in Thailand, the CAAT's roadmap towards compliance and the current status of the implementation of its corrective action plan.
Postopki, priročniki in orodja CAAT za preverjanje, vključno z njegovim informacijskim sistemom, so bili izboljšani, njegov program nadzora varnosti pa posodobljen, da bi se zagotovil popoln in neprekinjen nadzor letalskih prevoznikov, certificiranih na Tajskem.
The main elements of progress are Thailand's new Civil Aviation Act that is expected to enter into force in the last quarter of 2017, the amendment of the CAAT's regulations, its updated organisation, sustainable funding mechanisms and the improved staffing and training programme for its inspectors.
CAAT je tudi ustanovil službo za zagotavljanje kakovosti, katere naloga je spremljati skladnost CAAT z mednarodnimi in nacionalnimi standardi varnosti v letalstvu.
The CAAT's inspection processes, manuals and tools, including the IT system, have been improved and its safety oversight programme has been updated in order to ensure complete and continuous oversight of air carriers certified in Thailand.
CAAT je predložil tudi informacije o razvoju državnega varnostnega programa in stanju v zvezi z ugotovitvami presoje ICAO iz januarja 2015, vključno z resnim varnostnim pomislekom glede certificiranja letalskih prevoznikov na podlagi navedenih ugotovitev.
The CAAT has also created a quality assurance department, charged with monitoring the compliance of CAAT with international and national aviation safety standards.
Poleg tega je predložil informacije o doseženem napredku v zvezi s svojim načrtom trajnosti in mednarodnem sodelovanju.
The CAAT also provided information on the development of its State Safety Programme and the situation with respect to the findings raised during the ICAO audit of January 2015, including the Significant Safety Concern on the certification of air operators based on those findings.
Ponovna certifikacija letalskih prevoznikov na Tajskem na podlagi strukturiranega petstopenjskega pristopa ICAO za certifikacijo letalskih prevoznikov je pomemben element načrta korektivnih ukrepov CAAT.
Furthermore, the CAAT provided information on the progress made regarding its sustainability plan and the international cooperation that the CAAT is engaged in.
Februarja 2017 je bil ponovno certificiran prvi od navedenih letalskih prevoznikov, ki opravlja mednarodne lete, CAAT pa namerava do konca junija 2017 ponovno certificirati še 12 drugih letalskih prevoznikov, ki opravljajo mednarodne lete.
An important element of the corrective action plan of the CAAT is the recertification of the air carriers in Thailand, following the ICAO structured five phase approach for certication of air carriers.
CAAT je v postopku ponovne certifikacije sprejel izvršilne ukrepe v zvezi z nekaterimi vlagatelji vlog za ponovno certifikacijo.
In February 2017 the first of those air carriers which operates internationally was recertified and until the end of June 2017 the CAAT expects to recertify 12 other air carriers engaged in international air transport.
Tajska vlada in CAAT sta izkazala jasno zavezo k izboljšanju sistema za nadzor varnosti na Tajskem.
During the recertification process, the CAAT has taken enforcement measures in respect of certain applicants for recertification.
CAAT je predložil dokaze, da je bil v zadnjih šestih mesecih dosežen ustrezen napredek.
The government of Thailand and the CAAT demonstrated a clear commitment to improving the safety oversight system in Thailand.
Trenutno razpoložljive varnostne informacije o letalskih prevoznikih, certificiranih na Tajskem, ne podpirajo odločitve o prepovedi opravljanja letov ali omejitvah opravljanja dejavnosti.
The CAAT has provided evidence that relevant progress has been achieved over the past six months.
Zaradi pozornega spremljanja položaja se bodo posvetovanja s tajskimi organi nadaljevala v skladu s členom 3(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 473/2006.
The safety information available at present, with regard to air carriers certified in Thailand, does not support a decision to impose a ban or operational restrictions.
Zato Komisija v skladu s skupnimi merili iz Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2111/2005 ocenjuje, da trenutno ni razlogov za spremembo seznama letalskih prevoznikov, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Uniji, v zvezi z letalskimi prevozniki iz Tajske.
In order to monitor the situation closely, consultations with the authorities from Thailand are to continue, in accordance with Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 473/2006.
Države članice morajo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 965/2012 še naprej preverjati dejansko izpolnjevanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov s prednostno razvrstitvijo preverjanj na ploščadi, ki jih je treba opraviti na zrakoplovih letalskih prevoznikov, certificiranih na Tajskem.
In accordance with the common criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the Commission therefore considers that, at this time, there are no grounds for amending the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union with respect to air carriers from Thailand.
Letalski prevozniki iz Ukrajine
Member States are to continue to verify the effective compliance with relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on air carriers certified in Thailand, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Letalski prevoznik International Joint-Stock Aviation Company „URGA“, certificiran v Ukrajini, je 29. avgusta 2014 pri EASA zaprosil za pridobitev dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države.
Air carriers from Ukraine
EASA je vlogo ocenila v skladu z zahtevami iz Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 452/2014 in izrazila veliko zaskrbljenost, ker letalski prevoznik International Joint-Stock Aviation Company „URGA“ ni uspel dokazati skladnosti z veljavnimi zahtevami iz člena 3 Uredbe (EU) št. 452/2014.
On 29 August 2014, the air carrier International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’, certified in the Ukraine, applied to EASA for a TCO authorisation.
Zato je sklenila, da se prevozniku International Joint-Stock Aviation Company „URGA“ na podlagi nadaljnje ocene ne bi izdalo dovoljenje operatorja iz tretje države, ker ni izpolnil navedenih zahtev.
EASA assessed that application in accordance with the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 452/2014 and raised fundamental concerns regarding the failure by International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’ to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 452/2014.
Posledično je 15. septembra 2016 iz varnostnih razlogov zavrnila vlogo.
EASA therefore concluded that further assessment would not result in the issuing of a TCO authorisation to International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’ because it did not meet those requirements.
Letalski prevoznik Air Company „Black Sea Airlines“ LLC, registriran v Ukrajini, je 15. februarja 2016 pri EASA zaprosil za pridobitev dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države.
Therefore, on 15 September 2016, EASA rejected the application on safety grounds.
EASA je vlogo ocenila v skladu z zahtevami iz Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 452/2014 in izrazila veliko zaskrbljenost, ker letalski prevoznik Air Company „Black Sea Airlines“ LLC ni uspel dokazati skladnosti z veljavnimi zahtevami iz člena 3 Uredbe (EU) št. 452/2014.
On 15 February 2016, the air carrier Air Company ‘Black Sea Airlines’ LLC, registered in the Ukraine, applied to EASA for a TCO authorisation.
Zato je sklenila, da se prevozniku Air Company „Black Sea Airlines“ LLC na podlagi nadaljnje ocene ne bi izdalo dovoljenje operatorja iz tretje države, ker ni izpolnil navedenih zahtev.
EASA assessed that application in accordance with the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 452/2014 and raised fundamental concerns regarding the failure by Air Company ‘Black Sea Airlines’ LLC to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 452/2014.
Posledično je 13. oktobra 2016 iz varnostnih razlogov zavrnila vlogo.
EASA therefore concluded that further assessment would not result in the issuing of a TCO authorisation to Air Company ‘Black Sea Airlines’ LLC because it did not meet those requirements.
Komisija je 6. marca 2017 državno upravo Ukrajine za letalstvo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SAAU) zaprosila za informacije o ukrepih, ki so bili sprejeti po tem, ko je EASA zavrnila vlogi prevoznikov International Joint-Stock Aviation Company „URGA“ in Air Company „Black Sea Airlines“ LLC za pridobitev dovoljenja operatorja iz tretje države.
Therefore, on 13 October 2016, EASA rejected the application on safety grounds.
Z navedenim dopisom je v skladu z določbami iz člena 3(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 473/2006 začela uradna posvetovanja s SAAU.