natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The requirements of Chapter IV.K. of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, in conjunction with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 respectively, are not fulfilled for aid granted under measure RP 2 to undertakings not falling under the definition of SMEs, in particular to MUH Arla eG and Hochwald Foods GmbH (see paragraph 305).
Glej opombo 3.
The requirements of Chapter IV.K. of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, in conjunction with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 respectively, are also not fulfilled for aid granted under measure RP 2 in respect of repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition (see paragraph 301).
Nazadnje s členom 397 Uredbe z dne 31. avgusta 2015 (BGBl.
The Commission concludes that aid under measure RP 2 met the relevant conditions of the 2007-2013 Guidelines and was therefore compatible with the internal market in the period from 2007 only in the cases referred to in paragraph 306.
I, str. 1474).
In the cases referred to in paragraphs 307 and 308, aid measure RP 2 did not meet the relevant conditions of the 2007-2013 Guidelines and was therefore not compatible with the internal market in the period from 2007.
Str.
State aid for quality products in the period 2001-2006
34–36.
Measures to encourage the production and marketing of quality agricultural products implemented between 2001 and 2006 must meet the conditions specified under point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1857/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri državni pomoči za majhna in srednje velika podjetja, ki se ukvarjajo s proizvodnjo kmetijskih proizvodov, in o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 70/2001 (UL L 358, 16.12.2006, str. 3).
Point 13.2 contains a non-exhaustive list of eligible activities in this area.
Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči v kmetijskem in gozdarskem sektorju 2007–2013 (UL C 319, 27.12.2006, str. 1).
Aid may be granted for consultancy and similar support, including technical studies, feasibility and design studies and market research, to be given for activities related to the development of quality agricultural products, including:
Str.
the introduction of quality assurance schemes such as the ISO 9000 or 14000 series, systems based on hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) or environmental audit systems,
37–39.
the costs of training personnel to apply quality assurance and HACCP systems.
Str.
Aid may also be granted to cover the cost of the charges levied by recognised certifying bodies for the initial certification of quality assurance and similar systems.
38.
Points 3, 4 and 5 of point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines provide for special conditions and limitations.
Str.
The Commission takes the view that no aid should be granted in respect of routine in-process quality controls and routine product controls undertaken by the manufacturer, irrespective of whether they are undertaken on a voluntary basis or on a compulsory basis as a part of HACCP or similar systems.
43.
Aid should only be granted in respect of controls undertaken by or on behalf of third parties, such as the competent regulatory authorities, or bodies acting on their behalf, or independent organisms responsible for the control and supervision of the use of denominations of origin, organic labels, or quality labels.
Str.
The total amount of aid that can be granted for SMEs under this section must not exceed 50 % of eligible costs or EUR 100000 per beneficiary over a period of three years, depending on which amount is higher (see point 13.2).
47.
Baden-Württemberg, Lower Saxony and Thuringia (sub-measures BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 and TH 5) granted financial support for improving the quality of the delivered milk through advice and training of dairy producers, the compilation and updating of databases and checks of dairy producers, parallel with the introduction of the ‘Quality Management QM Milk’ quality assurance systems (see paragraph 126).
UL C 28, 1.2.2000, str. 2.
According to the German authorities, aid intensity amounted to a maximum of 100 % of eligible costs (see paragraph 129).
Str.
In the Opening Decision, the Commission expressed doubts regarding the compatibility of the abovementioned sub-measures with the internal market in the relevant period [80].
39–40.
The two sub-measures were carried out by the Milchprüfring Baden-Württemberg (BW 10) and the Milchwirtschaftlicher Verein Baden-Württemberg (BW 11) in favour of milk-producing agricultural enterprises which took part in the ‘QM-Milch’ quality assurance system (see paragraphs 131 and 132).
Str.
The execution of audits at dairy farms and the cost of initial certification by a recognised certification body (BW 10) as well as the costs of consultancy tasks in connection with the introduction of the quality assurance system (BW 11) were subsidised (see paragraphs 133 and 134).
40–41.
The subsidised costs thus correspond to the eligible costs laid down in point 13.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Sporočilo z dne 27. februarja 2015, str. 47.
Support was not provided for quality and product checks carried out routinely by the manufacturers during the production process, which are excluded in accordance with point 13.3.
Sporočilo v septembru 2013, str. 41–42.
According to the German authorities, the average expenditure was EUR 106 per beneficiary (see paragraph 135), well below the maximum allowable amount under point 13.2 of EUR 100000 per beneficiary over a period of three years.
Str.
The conditions set out in point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines are thus fulfilled in the case of sub-measures BW 10 and BW 11.
43–47.
Lower Saxony granted the LVMN financial support for the implementation of a quality assurance system for milk producers (‘QM-Milch’).
Str.
Point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines therefore applies.
55.
The costs of preparatory measures for the implementation of the QM-Milch system (consulting services) as well as the costs for the coordination of the QM-Milch system and the creation of a database were subsidised (see paragraph 137).
Str.
Funding amounted to EUR 12,78 per case for consulting services and EUR 35 per farmer within 3 years for farm audits (see paragraph 138), which is well below the upper threshold specified in point 13.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
56.
Germany has confirmed that the checks in the farm audits were carried out by or on behalf of third parties where the Landeskontrollverband Niedersachsen acts as an independent supervisory institution (see paragraph 139).
Nemški organi so v zvezi s tem zagotovili, da v letu 2001 (v obdobju, upoštevanem za postopek preiskave v glavni stvari) niso bile prevzete nobene pravno zavezujoče obveznosti do prejemnikov pomoči.
This meets the requirements laid down in point 13.3.
Str.
The measure in question thus fulfils the requirements set out in point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
58–59.
Thuringia granted the Thüringer Verband für Leistungs- und Qualitätsprüfungen in der Tierzucht (TVLEV) financial support for the introduction of a quality assurance system for milk producers (see paragraph 140).
Str.
Point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines therefore applies.
70–74.
According to the German authorities, the measure was introduced in 2004 (see paragraph 140).
Str.
According to Germany, in the period 2004-2006, producers were only subsidised with respect to initial certification.
76.
The average aid granted to individual producers amounted to approximately EUR 83 (see paragraph 141).
Sporočilo v februarju 2013.
The subsidised costs correspond to the costs eligible under point 13.2 and the amount of aid is far below the ceiling set in the same point.
Pravna podlaga za oglaševalske ukrepe v deželi Porenje – Pfalška je določena v odločbi o državni pomoči N 381/2009 „ukrepi kmetijske promocije v deželi Porenje – Pfalška“.
Measure TH 5 thus fulfils the requirements set out in point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Sporočilo z dne 27. februarja 2015, str. 48.
The Commission concludes that the aid assessed above (BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 and TH 5) did meet the relevant conditions of the 2000-2006 Guidelines and was therefore compatible with the internal market in the period 2001-2006.
Str.
Recovery
80.
Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 states that the powers of the Commission to recover aid are subject to a limitation period of 10 years.
Str.
According to Article 17(2) of that same Regulation, any action taken by the Commission with regard to unlawful aid interrupts this limitation period.
82.
Further to Germany's submission of the 2010 annual report on State aid in the agricultural sector, the Commission asked Germany by letter of 28 November 2011 to provide additional information on the scheme.
Str.
This action by the Commission interrupted the limitation period.
83.
In line with the ten-year limitation period referred to in paragraph 334, this Decision therefore relates to the period from 28 November 2001.
Str.
The Commission finds that the aid granted to Nordmilch eG in the period 2002-2003 under measure NI 6 (see paragraph 289) is not compatible with the internal market.
84.
This aid must be recovered.
Str.
The Commission also finds that the aid granted under measure RP 2 to undertakings not falling under the definition of SMEs, in particular to MUH Arla eG and Hochwald Foods GmbH (see paragraph 307) and the aid granted in respect of repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition (see paragraph 308) are not compatible with the internal market.
85.
Based on the suspensive effect of the formal procedure under Article 108(3) TFEU, the Commission is examining measure RP 2 from 1 January 2007 up to 17 July 2013, the date on which the Commission notified Germany of its decision to initiate proceedings under Article 108(2) TFEU.
UL C 319, 27.12.2006, str. 1.
CONCLUSION
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 70/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe Evropske skupnosti pri pomoči za majhna in srednje velika podjetja (UL L 10, 13.1.2001, str.
The Commission finds that Germany has unlawfully implemented the aid schemes in question in question in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
33).
This aid is, with the exception of the aid cases mentioned in the following recital, compatible with the internal market (see paragraphs 289, 309 and 333).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 800/2008 z dne 6. avgusta 2008 o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči za združljive s skupnim trgom z uporabo členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe (Uredba o splošnih skupinskih izjemah) (UL L 214, 9.8.2008, str.
The Commission finds that the aid granted under measure NI 6 to Nordmilch eG and the aid granted under measure RP 2 to MUH Arla eG and Hochwald Foods GmbH, and the aid granted under measure RP 2 in respect of repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition (see paragraphs 290 and 310) are not compatible with the internal market.
3) je bila s 1. julijem 2014 razveljavljena z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 651/2014 z dne 17. junija 2014 o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči za združljive z notranjim trgom pri uporabi členov 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 187, 26.6.2014, str. 1).
This aid must be recovered,
Točka 244 sklepa o začetku postopka.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Str.
Article 1
77.
State aid granted unlawfully by Germany between 28 November 2001 and 31 December 2006 (measures BY 3, BY 10, BW 4, BB 1, BB 3, HE 2, HE 3, HE 9, NI 5, NI 6, NI 7, NW 4, NW 5, NW 6, RP 1, RP 5, SL 2, SL 5, TH 3, TH 4, TH 9, TH 10, BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 and TH 5) or between 1 January 2007 and 17 July 2013 (measure RP 2) in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU is compatible with the internal market, with the exception of that referred to in Article 2.
Ta uredba je bila s 1. julijem 2014 razveljavljena z Uredbo (EU) št. 702/2014 z dne 25. junija 2014 o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči v kmetijskem in gozdarskem sektorju ter na podeželju za združljive z notranjim trgom z uporabo členov 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 193, 1.7.2014, str. 1).
Article 2
QM-Milch je enoten zvezni medpodjetniški standard za pridelavo mleka, ki velja med proizvajalci mleka in mlekarnami in je bil priznan kot podlaga certificiranja za kontrolne organe.
State aid granted by Germany in 2002 and 2003 to Nordmilch eG as part of measure NI 6, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU, is incompatible with the internal market.
Točka 66 v sklepu o začetku postopka.
The aid granted by Germany between 1 January 2007 and 17 July 2013, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU, under measure RP 2 to undertakings not falling under the definition of SMEs, in particular to MUH Arla eG and Hochwald Foods GmbH, is incompatible with the internal market.
Točka 253 v sklepu o začetku postopka.
State aid granted by Germany between 1 January 2007 and 17 July 2013, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU, under measure RP 2 in respect of repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition, is incompatible with the internal market.
Str.
Article 3
11.
Individual aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 2 does not constitute aid if, at the time it was granted, it met the conditions laid down in a regulation adopted pursuant to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1588 [81] and that regulation was applicable at the time the aid was granted.Article 4
Mnenje z dne 20. septembra 2013, str. 12.
Individual aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 2 which, at the time the aid is granted, fulfils the conditions laid down in a regulation adopted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1588 or by any other approved aid scheme, is compatible with the internal market, up to the maximum aid intensities applicable to this type of aid.
Mnenje z dne 20. septembra 2013, str. 50.
Article 5
Str.
The Federal Republic of Germany shall recover from the beneficiaries the aid that was granted in relation to the aid schemes referred to in Article 2 and that is incompatible with the internal market.
50.
The amount to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which it was put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until its actual recovery.
Mnenje z dne 20. septembra 2013, str. 83–84.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 [82] amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Oddelek 3.3.
Germany shall cancel all outstanding payments of aid under the schemes referred to in Article 2 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Komisija je prejela mnenje združenja Landesvereinigung der Milchwirtschaft Niedersachsen e.
Article 6
V., ki se nanaša na vse ukrepe, financirane iz sredstev dajatve na mleko, na splošno in ne le na tu obravnavane podukrepe.
Recovery of the aid granted under the schemes referred to in Article 2 shall be immediate and effective.
Deželno združenje je trdilo, da ne gre za državno pomoč.
Germany shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months of the date of notification of the Decision.
Izčrpen opis mnenj je mogoče najti v Sklepu Komisije (EU) 2015/2432 z dne 18. septembra 2015 o državni pomoči za preskuse kakovosti mleka v okviru Zakona o mleku in maščobah, ki jo je dodelila Nemčija – SA.35484 (2013/C) (ex SA.35484 (2012/NN)) (UL L 334, 22.12.2015, str. 23).
Article 7
Sodba Sodišča z dne 20. novembra 2003, Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie / GEMO, C-126/01, EU:C:2003:622, točka 23.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Germany shall submit the following information to the Commission:
Sodba Sodišča z dne 20. novembra 2003 v zadevi Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie / GEMO, C-126/01, EU:C:2003:622, ZOdl.
the list of beneficiaries that have received aid under the schemes referred to in Article 2 and the total amount of aid received by each of them under the schemes;
2003, I-13769, točka 24.
the total amount (principal and recovery interest) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
Npr. za Spodnjo Saško: Verordnung über die Erhebung einer Umlage auf dem Gebiet der Milchwirtschaft (Uredba o pobiranju dajatve v sektorju mleka) z dne 26. novembra 2004 (Nds.GVBl., št. 36/2004, str. 519), kakor je bila spremenjena s členom 6 Uredbe z dne 22. decembra 2005 (Nds.
a detailed description of the measures already taken or planned to comply with this Decision;
GVBl., št. 31/2005, str. 475).
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 30. maja 2013, Doux Élevage SNC in Coopérative agricole UKL-ARREE / Ministère de l'Agriculture, C-677/11, EU:C:2013:348, točke 32, 35 in 38.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid granted in accordance with the schemes referred to in Article 2 has been completed.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980 v zadevi Philip Morris Holland BV proti Komisiji, 730/79, EU:C:1980:209, točki 11 in 12.
Upon request by the Commission, Germany shall immediately submit information on the measures already taken or planned to comply with this Decision.
Glej zlasti sodbo Sodišča z dne 13. julija 1988 v zadevi Francoska republika proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1988:391, točka 19.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 927/2012 z dne 9. oktobra 2012 o spremembi Priloge I k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 o tarifni in statistični nomenklaturi ter skupni carinski tarifi (UL L 304, 31.10.2012, str. 1).
Article 8
Vir: Eurostat.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (EU) 2015/1589 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
Germany is requested to forward a copy of this Decision to the beneficiaries of the aid without delay.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 30. aprila 2002 v združenih zadevah T-195/01 in T-207/01, Gibraltar/Komisija, EU:T:2002:111, točka 111.
Done at Brussels, 29 May 2017.
Glej uvodno izjavo 17
For the Commission
Bavarska: Verordnung über eine Umlage für Milch (Uredba o dajatvi na mleko) z dne 30. junija 1983 (GVBL, str. 547); Baden-Württemberg: Verordnung über die Erhebung von milchwirtschaftlichen Umlagen (Uredba o uvedbi dajatev v sektorju mleka) z dne 18. maja 2004 (UL str. 350, 355); Severno Porenje – Vestfalija: Verordnung über Umlagen zur Förderung der Milchwirtschaft (Uredba o dajatvah za spodbujanje sektorja mleka) z dne 30. novembra 1965 (GV.
Member of the Commission
NW.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the TFEU.
1965, str. 349); Porenje – Pfalška: Landesverordnung zur Durchführung des Milch- und Fettgesetzes (Deželna uredba o izvajanju Zakona o mleku in maščobah) z dne 16. avgusta 1960 (GVBl., str. 218, BS 7842-2); Brandenburg – Verordnung zur Übertragung der Ermächtigungen zum Erlass von Rechtsverordnungen nach dem Milch- und Fettgesetz (Uredba o prenosu pooblastil za sprejetje pravnih predpisov v skladu z Zakonom o mleku in maščobah, ÜErmVO) z dne 5. decembra 1992 (GVBl.II/92, [št. 72], str. 764); Hessen – Verordnung über die Erhebung einer Umlage zur Förderung der Milchwirtschaft (Uredba o pobiranju dajatve za spodbujanje sektorja mleka) z dne 1. decembra 1981 (GVBl.
The two sets of Articles are in substance identical.
I 1981, str. 427); Posarje: Verordnung über die Erhebung einer Umlage auf dem Gebiet der Milchwirtschaft (Uredba o pobiranju dajatve v sektorju mleka) z dne 9. decembra 1982 (Uradni list 1982, str. 1007); Turingija:Thüringer Verordnung über die Erhebung einer Umlage zur Förderung der Milchwirtschaft (Uredba zvezne dežele Turingije o pobiranju dajatve za spodbujanje sektorja mleka) z dne 29. decembra 1999 v različici z dne 27. novembra 2001 (GVBl.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty where appropriate.
2000, 20).
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p.
V Spodnji Saški je bila dajatev na mleko uvedena z Odredbo o pobiranju dajatve v sektorju mleka in maščob z dne 6. julija 1951 v različici Odredbe z dne 25. marca 1952 (Nds.
1).
GVBl.
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9).
Sb.
With effect from 14 November 2015, this Council Regulation repeals Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 and replaces these rules.
I, str. 689).
In accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589, references to the repealed Regulation are regarded as references to Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 and must be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex II to that Regulation.
Pobiranje dajatve je v obdobju, upoštevnem z vidika državne pomoči, temeljilo na Uredbi o pobiranju dajatve v sektorju mleka z dne 22. maja 1973 (Nds.
See footnote 3.
GVBl. str. 179), uporaba sredstev iz dajatve pa je bila določena z Deželnimi smernicami za dodelitvi pomoči za spodbujanje sektorja mleka v Spodnji Saški v skladu s členom 22(2) MFG z dne 8. novembra 1985 (Nds.
Most recently by Article 397 of the Regulation of 31 August 2015 (BGBl.
MBl.
I, p. 1474).
43/1985).
pp. 34-36
UL C 119, 22.5.2002, str. 22.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 (OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p. 3).
Nemška jezikovna različica smernic Skupnosti 2000–2006 vsebuje izčrpen seznam upravičenih stroškov.
Community guidelines for State aid in the agriculture and forestry sector 2007 to 2013 (OJ C 319, 27.12.2006, p. 1).
Angleška jezikovna različica, v kateri so bile smernice Skupnosti prvotno napisane, pa te upravičene stroške navaja primeroma in ne izčrpno.
pp. 37-39
To velja tudi za francosko jezikovno različico.
p. 38
Sklep o začetku postopka, točki 235 in 236.
p. 43
Pri tem se je Komisija v točki 236 sklepa o začetku postopka oprla na nemško jezikovno različico smernic Skupnosti 2000–2006 in zastopala mnenje, da se lahko pod točko 14.1 odobri le pomoč za razširjanje novih metod (v zvezi s tem glej opombo72).
p. 47
Glej opombo 24 v tem sklepu.
OJ C 28, 1.2.2000, p. 2.
Podatki: 2009; vir: http://www.nordmilch.de/unternehmen/geschichte/.
pp. 39-40
Aprila 2011 sta se družbi Nordmilch GmbH in Humana Milchindustrie GmbH združili v družbo DMK Deutsches Milchkontor GmbH.
pp. 40-41
UL L 107, 30.4.1996, str. 4.
Communication dated 27 February 2015, p. 47.
Nemčija je v sporočilu z dne 27. februarja 2015 navedla, da že poteka preverjanje zahteve o vračilu te pomoči (glej točko 68).
Communication of September 2013, pp. 41-42.
To v zvezi z ukrepom RP 5 potrjuje tudi združenje MILAG v svojem mnenju z dne 10. februarja (glej točko 153).
pp. 43-47
Glej opombo79.
p. 55
Zdaj člen 107(3)(c) PDEU.
p. 56
Uredba (ES) št. 800/2008 je bila z dnem 1. julija 2014 razveljavljena z Uredbo (EU) št. 651/2014.
In this regard, German authorities gave assurances that no legally binding commitments had been made towards beneficiaries in 2001 (in the period relevant for the examination).
Sklep o začetku postopka, točka 244.
pp. 58-59
Vir: http://www.arlafoods.de/ubersicht/presse/2012/pressrelease/eu-genehmigt-fusion-der-milch-union-hocheifel-und-arla-836614/
pp. 70-74
Vir: https://www.hochwald.de/de/unternehmen/zahlen-fakten.html
p. 76
Pri tem se točka 9 smernic 2007–2013 sklicuje na Prilogo I k Uredbi (ES) št. 70/2001, ki jo je dne 29. avgusta 2008 nadomestila Priloga I k Uredbi (ES) št. 800/2008.
Communication of February 2013.
Sklep o začetku postopka, točka 253.