natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To ensure reliability of the obtained analytical data, Member States should ensure the availability of suitable analytical equipment and gain sufficient experience in the analysis of MOH both in food and in food contact materials before generating analytical results.
Za zagotovitev zanesljivosti analitskih podatkov bi morale države članice pred njihovim pridobivanjem zagotoviti ustrezno analitsko opremo in pridobiti dovolj izkušenj v zvezi z analizo ogljikovodikov mineralnih olj tako v živilih kot v materialih, namenjenih za stik z živili.
To ensure the uniform application of this recommendation, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Food Contact Materials (EU-RL) should provide further guidance to the competent authorities of the Member States and other interested parties, including guidance on information that could be collected during investigations as well as methods of sampling and analysis,
Za zagotovitev enotne uporabe tega priporočila bi moral referenčni laboratorij EU za materiale, namenjene za stik z živili, pristojnim organom držav članic in drugim zainteresiranim stranem zagotoviti dodatna navodila, vključno s smernicami o informacijah, ki se lahko zberejo med preiskavami, ter metodah vzorčenja in analize –
The monitoring should cover animal fat, bread and rolls, fine bakery ware, breakfast cereals, confectionery (including chocolate) and cocoa, fish meat, fish products (canned fish), grains for human consumption, ices and desserts, oilseeds, pasta, products derived from cereals, pulses, sausages, tree nuts, vegetable oils, as well as food contact materials used for those products.
Ker take smernice še ne obstajajo, bi morale države članice sodelovati z referenčnim laboratorijem EU za skupen razvoj navedenih smernic v skladu s svojimi potrebami za razvoj analitskih zmogljivosti.
To ensure uniform application of this recommendation and in order to generate reliable and comparable results of the monitoring, specific guidance developed by the EU-RL in the context of this Recommendation (‘the guidance’) should be followed.
Države članice bi morale izvajati vzorčenje živil v skladu z določbami iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 333/2007 [2].
As such guidance does not exist yet, the Member States should collaborate with the EU-RL to jointly develop that guidance in accordance with their needs for developing analytical capabilities.
Vzorčenje bi moralo vključevati sorazmerno število predpakiranih živil.
Member States should perform food sampling in accordance with the provisions laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 [2].
Vzorčenje materialov, namenjenih za stik z živili, bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z dobrimi praksami, primernimi za posebne materiale ali izdelke, kot bo izraženo v smernicah.
Sampling should include a proportionate number of pre-packaged foods.
Nadaljnje možne vire ogljikovodikov mineralnih olj, povezanih z uporabo drugih materialov, namenjenih za stik z živili, v dobavni verigi, na primer med skladiščenjem ali predelavo, bi bilo treba preiskati, kadar obstajajo jasni dokazi, da ti prispevajo k prisotnosti ogljikovodikov mineralnih olj.
Sampling of food contact materials should be carried out in accordance with the best practices appropriate for specific materials or articles as reflected in the guidance.
Vzorčenje predpakiranih živil bi se moralo osredotočiti na blago, ki se bliža koncu minimalnega roka trajanja, in kadar skladiščenje ali predelava poteka v razmeroma toplih pogojih.
Further possible sources of MOH related to the use of other food contact materials in the supply chain, such as during storage or processing, should be investigated where there is a clear indication that these are contributing to the presence of MOH.
Vzorce bi bilo treba analizirati takšne, kot se tržijo.
The sampling of pre-packaged food should focus on commodities that are closer to the end of the minimum date of durability, and where storage or processing takes place at relatively warm conditions.
Za predpakirana živila bi bilo treba vsebnost ogljikovodikov mineralnih olj določiti v živilih in materialih, namenjenih za stik z živili, če obstaja sum, da je to vir odkritih ogljikovodikov mineralnih olj.
The samples should be analysed as marketed.
Posebno pozornost bi bilo treba nameniti razlikam med nasičenimi ogljikovodiki mineralnih olj in aromatskimi ogljikovodiki mineralnih olj ter razlagi analitskih rezultatov, da se zagotovi zanesljivost in primerljivost pridobljenih podatkov.
For pre-packaged food, the level of mineral oil hydrocarbons should be determined both in the food and in the food contact material if that is the suspected source of detected MOH.
Države članice, ki nameravajo analizirati prisotnost nasičenih ogljikovodikov mineralnih olj in aromatskih ogljikovodikov mineralnih olj v živilih in materialih, namenjenih za stik z živili, lahko zaprosijo za tehnično pomoč referenčni laboratorij EU za materiale, namenjene za stik z živili.
Particular attention should be paid to the differences between MOSH and MOAH and to the interpretation of the analytical results to ensure that the generated data are reliable and comparable.
Kadar se v živilu odkrijejo ogljikovodiki mineralnih olj, bi morale države članice opraviti nadaljnje preiskave v obratih živilske dejavnosti, da ugotovijo morebitni vir ali vire.
Member States which intend to analyse the presence of MOSH and MOAH in foods and food contact materials may request technical assistance of the EU-RL for Food Contact Materials.
Preiskave bi morale, kadar je to mogoče, zajemati sisteme, ki jih upravlja nosilec živilske dejavnosti in bi lahko vplivali na onesnaženje ali njegov nadzor (npr. metode proizvodnje in predelave, analiza tveganj in kritičnih nadzornih točk (HACCP) oziroma podobni sistemi ali ukrepi za preprečitev take prisotnosti).
Where MOH are detected in food, Member States should carry out further investigations in the food business establishments in order to determine the possible source or sources.
Kadar se ogljikovodiki mineralnih olj odkrijejo v materialih, namenjenih za stik z živili, ali izvirajo iz njih, bi morale države članice zbrati podatke o materialih, namenjenih za stik z živili (npr. vrsta in sestava pakirnega materiala, prisotnost funkcionalnih ovir, rok uporabnosti pakiranih živil), in opraviti nadaljnje preiskave v obratih proizvajalcev, predelovalcev in distributerjev materialov, namenjenih za stik z živili, da vzpostavijo sisteme, ki jih izvajajo zadevna podjetja (npr. metode proizvodnje in predelave materialov, namenjenih za stik z živili, in dokumentacija o dobri proizvodni praksi, ki se zahteva v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2023/2006 [3]), kot bo navedeno v smernicah.
The investigations should, wherever possible, cover the systems operated by the food business operator that could affect or control contamination (e.g. production and processing methods, Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) or similar systems or measures implemented to prevent such presence).
Države članice, nosilci živilske dejavnosti, proizvajalci, predelovalci in distributerji materialov, namenjenih za stik z živili, ter druge zainteresirane strani bi morali Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane predložiti podatke o spremljanju, izražene na podlagi celotne mase, skupaj z drugimi informacijami in v elektronski obliki, ki jih določi EFSA za zbiranje podatkov v enotni bazi.
Where MOH are detected in or originate from food contact materials, Member States should collect data on the food contact material (e.g. type and composition of the packaging material, presence of functional barrier, shelf life of the packaged food) and carry out further investigations in the establishments of the manufacturers, processors and distributors of food contact materials to establish the systems operated by the businesses concerned (e.g. production and processing methods of food contact material, and documentation required under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2023/2006 [3] on good manufacturing practices) as indicated in the guidance.
V Bruslju, 16. januarja 2017
They should preferably provide the monitoring data by 1 October 2017 and subsequently by 1 October 2018.
Član Komisije
The last results should be provided by 28 February 2019.
Odbor EFSA za onesnaževala v prehranski verigi (Contam); Znanstveno mnenje o ogljikovodikih mineralnih olj v živilih.
Potentially available occurrence data from 2016 that has not yet been provided should be transmitted in accordance with the same modalities at the earliest opportunity.
EFSA Journal 2012;10(6):2704.
Done at Brussels, 16 January 2017.
185 str., doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2704.
For the Commission
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 333/2007 z dne 28. marca 2007 o določitvi metod vzorčenja in analitskih metod za uradni nadzor vsebnosti svinca, kadmija, živega srebra, anorganskega kositra, 3-MCPD in benzo-a-pirena v živilih (UL L 88, 29.3.2007, str.
Member of the Commission
29).
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Scientific Opinion on Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons in Food.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2023/2006 z dne 22. decembra 2006 o dobri proizvodni praksi za materiale in izdelke, namenjene za stik z živili (UL L 384, 29.12.2006, str.
EFSA Journal 2012;10(6):2704. p.
75).
185 pp., doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2704.
Države članice bi morale skupaj z aktivnim sodelovanjem nosilcev živilske dejavnosti ter proizvajalcev, predelovalcev in distributerjev materialov, namenjenih za stik z živili, ter drugih zainteresiranih strani spremljati prisotnost ogljikovodikov mineralnih olj v živilih v letih 2017 in 2018.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 of 28 March 2007 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin, 3-MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in foodstuffs (OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p.
Spremljanje bi moralo zajemati živalske maščobe, kruh in štručke, fine pekovske izdelke, žitne kosmiče za zajtrk, konditorske izdelke (vključno s čokolado) in kakav, ribje meso, ribje proizvode (konzervirane ribje proizvode), žito za prehrano ljudi, sladolede in sladice, oljnice, testenine, proizvode, pridobljene iz žit, stročnice, klobase, lupinarje, rastlinska olja ter materiale, namenjene za stik z živili, ki se uporabljajo za navedene proizvode.
29).
Podatki o spremljanju naj bi se predložili do 1. oktobra 2017 oziroma do 1. oktobra 2018.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2023/2006 of 22 December 2006 on good manufacturing practice for materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (OJ L 384, 29.12.2006, p.
Zadnje rezultate bi bilo treba predložiti do 28. februarja 2019.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/146
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2017/146
regarding the rule of law in Poland complementary to Recommendation (EU) 2016/1374
v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem o dopolnitvi Priporočila (EU) 2016/1374
On 27 July 2016, the Commission adopted a Recommendation regarding the rule of law in Poland [1], setting out its concerns on the situtation of the Constitutional Tribunal and recommending how these should be addressed.
Komisija je 27. julija 2016 sprejela priporočilo v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem [1], v katerem je navedla svoje pomisleke glede položaja ustavnega sodišča in priporočila, kako naj se odpravijo.
The Recommendation of the Commission was adopted under the Rule of Law Framework [2].
Priporočilo Komisije je bilo sprejeto v okviru za krepitev pravne države [2].
The Rule of Law Framework sets out how the Commission will react should clear indications of a threat to the rule of law emerge in a Member State of the Union and explains the principles which the rule of law entails.
Ta okvir določa, kako se bo Komisija odzvala, če bi se pokazali jasni znaki nevarnosti za načelo pravne države v državi članici Unije, in pojasnjuje načela, ki izhajajo iz načela pravne države.
The Rule of Law Framework provides guidance for a dialogue between the Commission and the Member State in order to prevent the emergence of a systemic threat to the rule of law that could develop into a ‘clear risk of a serious breach’ which would potentially trigger the use of the ‘Article 7 TEU Procedure’.
Okvir za krepitev pravne države določa smernice za dialog med Komisijo in državo članico, da se preprečijo nove sistemske nevarnosti za pravno državo, ki bi lahko privedle do „očitnega tveganja hujše kršitve“, kar bi lahko sprožilo uporabo postopka iz člena 7 PEU.
The European Union is founded on a common set of values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (‘TEU’), which include the respect for the rule of law.
Evropska unija temelji na skupnih vrednotah, zapisanih v členu 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PEU), med katerimi je tudi spoštovanje pravne države.
Case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as documents drawn up by the Council of Europe, building notably on the expertise of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (‘Venice Commission’), provides a non-exhaustive list of these principles and hence defines the core meaning of the rule of law as a common value of the Union in accordance with Article 2 TEU.
Sodna praksa Sodišča Evropske unije in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ter dokumenti Sveta Evrope, pripravljeni predvsem na podlagi strokovnega mnenja Evropske komisije za demokracijo skozi pravo („Beneške komisije“), zagotavljajo neizčrpen seznam navedenih načel in tako opredeljujejo bistveni pomen načela pravne države kot skupne vrednote Unije v skladu s členom 2 PEU.
Those principles include legality, which implies a transparent, accountable, democratic and pluralistic process for enacting laws; legal certainty; prohibition of arbitrariness of the executive powers; independent and impartial courts; effective judicial review including respect for fundamental rights; and equality before the law [3].
Ta načela so zakonitost, ki vključuje pregleden, odgovoren, demokratičen in pluralističen postopek sprejemanja zakonov, pravna varnost, prepoved samovoljnega ravnanja izvršilnih oblasti, neodvisno in nepristransko sodišče, učinkovito sodno varstvo, vključno s spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic, in enakost pred zakonom [3].
In its Recommendation of 27 July 2016, the Commission explained the circumstances in which it decided, on 13 January 2016, to examine the situation under the Rule of Law Framework and in which it adopted, on 1 June 2016, an Opinion concerning the rule of law in Poland.
Komisija je v Priporočilu z dne 27. julija 2016 pojasnila okoliščine, v katerih se je 13. januarja 2016 odločila preučiti stanje v skladu z okvirom za krepitev pravne države in v katerih je 1. junija 2016 sprejela mnenje v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem.
The Recommendation also explained that the exchanges between the Commission and the Polish Government were not able to resolve the concerns of the Commission.
V navedenem priporočilu je bilo pojasnjeno tudi, da z izmenjavami med Komisijo in poljsko vlado pomisleki Komisije niso bili odpravljeni.
In its Recommendation, the Commission found that there was a systemic threat to the rule of law in Poland and recommended that the Polish authorities take appropriate action to address this threat as a matter of urgency.
Komisija je v Priporočilu ugotovila, da na Poljskem obstaja sistemska nevarnost za načelo pravne države, in priporočila, naj poljski organi sprejmejo nujne ustrezne ukrepe za odpravo te nevarnosti.
In particular the Commission recommended that the Polish authorities: (a) implement fully the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 3 and 9 December 2015 which require that the three judges that were lawfully nominated in October 2015 by the 7th term of the Sejm can take up their judicial functions in the Constitutional Tribunal, and that the three judges nominated by the 8th term of the Sejm without a valid legal basis do not take up their judicial functions; (b) publish and implement fully the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 9 March 2016 and ensure that the publication of future judgments is automatic and does not depend on any decision of the executive or legislative powers; (c) ensure that any reform of the Law on the Constitutional Tribunal respects the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal, including the judgments of 3 and 9 December 2015 and the judgment of 9 March 2016, and takes the Opinion of the Venice Commission fully into account; and ensure that the effectiveness of the Constitutional Tribunal as a guarantor of the Constitution is not undermined by requirements; (d) ensure that the Constitutional Tribunal can review the compatibility of the new law adopted on 22 July 2016 on the Constitutional Tribunal before its entry into force and publish and implement fully the judgment of the Tribunal in that respect; (e) refrain from actions and public statements which could undermine the legitimacy and efficiency of the Constitutional Tribunal.
Komisija je zlasti priporočila, naj poljski organi: (a) v celoti izvršijo sodbi ustavnega sodišča z dne 3. in 9. decembra 2015, ki zahtevata, da trije sodniki, ki jih je oktobra 2015 zakonito imenovala 7. sestava Sejma, nastopijo svojo funkcijo ustavnih sodnikov in da trije sodniki, ki jih je imenovala 8. sestava Sejma brez ustrezne pravne podlage, svoje funkcije sodnika ne nastopijo; (b) objavijo in v celoti izvršijo sodbo ustavnega sodišča z dne 9. marca 2016 ter zagotovijo, da bodo prihodnje sodbe objavljene samodejno, ne pa glede na odločitev izvršilnih ali zakonodajnih oblasti; (c) zagotovijo, da bodo vse reforme zakona o ustavnem sodišču spoštovale sodbe ustavnega sodišča, vključno s sodbama z dne 3. in 9. decembra 2015 in sodbo z dne 9. marca 2016, ter v celoti upoštevale mnenje Beneške komisije; zagotovijo, da učinkovitost ustavnega sodišča kot varuha ustave ne bo oslabljena zaradi učinka zahtev; (d) omogočijo, da ustavno sodišče opravi ustavni pregled novega zakona o ustavnem sodišču z dne 22. julija 2016, preden ta začne veljati, ter objavijo in v celoti izvršijo sodbo sodišča v zvezi s tem; (e) se vzdržijo ukrepov in javnih izjav, ki bi lahko spodkopale legitimnost in učinkovitost ustavnega sodišča.
The Commission invited the Polish Government to solve the problems identified in the Recommendation within 3 months, and to inform the Commission of the steps taken to that effect.
Komisija je pozvala poljsko vlado, naj v treh mesecih odpravi težave, navedene v Priporočilu, in Komisijo obvesti o ukrepih, sprejetih v ta namen.
The Commission noted that it remained ready to pursue a constructive dialogue with the Polish Government.
Komisija je navedla, da je še vedno pripravljena nadaljevati konstruktiven dialog s poljsko vlado.
On 30 July 2016, the President of the Republic signed the Law of 22 July 2016, which was published in the Official Journal on 1 August 2016.
Predsednik republike je 30. julija 2016 podpisal zakon z dne 22. julija 2016, ki je bil v Uradnem listu objavljen 1. avgusta 2016.
The judgment held that a number of provisions of that law, all of which were also identified as a concern by the Commission in its Recommendation, were unconstitutional.
, neodvisnost sodnikov [6] ter načelo integritete in učinkovitosti javnih institucij [7].
The grounds of unconstitutionality were notably the principles of the separation and balance of powers [5], the independence of courts and tribunals from other branches of power [5] Articles 38(3)-(6), 61(6), 83(2), 84-87 and 89 of the Law of 22 July 2016.
Vendar poljska vlada ni priznala veljavnosti te sodbe in je ni objavila v Uradnem listu.
, the independence of judges [6] and the principle of integrity and efficiency of the public institutions [7].
Urad poljskega državnega tožilstva je 18. avgusta 2016 izdal obvestilo o sprožitvi kazenske preiskave proti predsedniku ustavnega sodišča, ker trem sodnikom, ki jih je decembra 2015 imenovala nova sestava Sejma, ni dovolil prevzeti funkcije.
On 16 August 2016, the Polish Government published 21 judgments of the Tribunal rendered in a period from 6 April 2016 to 19 July 2016.
Dne 30. septembra 2016 je skupina poslancev Sejma predložila nov zakonodajni predlog o statusu ustavnih sodnikov.
The publication of these judgments appears to have been based on Article 89 of the Law of 22 July 2016 which provided that ‘The Tribunal's rulings issued in breach of the provisions of the Constitutional Tribunal Act of 25 June 2015 before 20 July 2016 shall be published within 30 days from the entry into force of this Act, with the exception of rulings concerning normative acts that have ceased to have effect.’
Predlog vsebuje določbe o pravicah in obveznostih ustavnih sodnikov, ureditvah za imenovanje ustavnih sodnikov, njihovih mandatih in prenehanju mandatov ter vprašanjih imunitete, osebne integritete in disciplinske odgovornosti.
This provision was among those declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Tribunal in its judgment of 11 August 2016.
Dne 14. oktobra 2016 je Beneška komisija sprejela mnenje o zakonu z dne 22. julija 2016 [9].
Moreover, neither the judgments of 9 March 2016 and of 11 August 2016 nor the 16 judgments rendered since 11 August 2016 have been published by the Government.
V mnenju je bilo poudarjeno tudi, da vprašanje imenovanja sodnikov ni bilo rešeno v skladu s priporočili in da bi bilo izvajanje določbe zakona z dne 22. julija 2016, v skladu s katero mora predsednik ustavnega sodišča dodeliti zadeve decembrskim sodnikom, v nasprotju s sodbami ustavnega sodišča, ki so univerzalno zavezujoče in zato zavezujoče za vse državne organe, tudi za ustavno sodišče in njegovega predsednika.
On 18 August 2016, the Polish Prosecutor's Service informed about the launching of a criminal investigation against the President of the Constitutional Tribunal for not allowing three judges who had been appointed by the new legislature in December 2015 to take up their function.
V mnenju je bilo ugotovljeno, da si je poljski parlament s sprejetjem zakona prilastil pooblastila za ustavno revizijo, ki jih kot redno zakonodajno telo ni imel.
The proposal contains provisions on the rights and obligations of judges of the Tribunal, the arrangements for appointing judges of the Tribunal, their mandate and termination of office and questions on immunity, personal integrity and liability to disciplinary action.
Poljska vlada se je odločila, da ne bo sodelovala na zasedanju Beneške komisije 14. oktobra 2016, saj je po njenem mnenju mnenje Beneške komisije pristransko in ne upošteva stališča vlade.
On 14 October 2016, the Venice Commission adopted its opinion on the Law of 22 July 2016 [9].
Dne 26. oktobra 2016 je skupina poslancev Sejma predložila nov zakonodajni predlog o organizaciji ustavnega sodišča in postopkov pred sodiščem.
The opinion noted that the Law contains some improvements as compared to the Law of 22 December 2015 which had been the subject matter of the opinion of the Venice Commission of March 2016.
Predlog vsebuje podrobne določbe o organizaciji ustavnega sodišča in postopkov pred sodiščem, vključno z novimi pravili o izvolitvi predsednika in podpredsednika ustavnega sodišča.
However, it considered that these improvements are too limited in scope, because other provisions of the Law as adopted would considerably delay and obstruct the work of the Tribunal, possibly make its work ineffective, as well as undermine its independence by exercising excessive legislative and executive control over its functioning.
Predlog dopolnjuje zakonodajni predlog o statusu ustavnih sodnikov, predložen Sejmu 30. septembra 2016 (glej zgoraj).
Such other provisions include for example those on postponing a case for up to 6 months upon request by four judges, on allowing the Prosecutor-General to block a hearing by his or her absence, or on suspending all institutional cases for 6 months, followed by re-registration.
Zakonodajna predloga sta tesno povezana in naj bi nadomestila zakon z dne 22. julija 2016.
The opinion also criticised the system of proposing candidates for the post of President of the Tribunal to the President of the Republic, which could lead to a situation that a candidate is appointed who does not enjoy the support of a substantial number of judges.
Poljska vlada je 27. oktobra 2016, pred iztekom trimesečnega roka iz Priporočila, odgovorila na Priporočilo Komisije.