natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Union agri-food chain legislation is based on the principle that operators at all the stages of production, processing and distribution which are under their control are responsible for ensuring compliance with the requirements relevant to their activities established by Union agri-food chain legislation.
Zakonodaja Unije o agroživilski verigi temelji na načelu, da so izvajalci dejavnosti v vseh fazah proizvodnje, predelave in distribucije pod njihovim nadzorom odgovorni zagotoviti, da so izpolnjene zahteve iz zakonodaje Unije o agroživilski verigi, ki zadevajo njihove dejavnosti.
Union rules on marketing standards for fishery and aquaculture products ensure sustainable products and the realisation of the full potential of the internal market; they facilitate marketing activities based on fair competition, thereby helping to improve the profitability of production.
Pravila Unije o tržnih standardih za ribiške proizvode in proizvode iz akvakulture zagotavljajo trajnostne proizvode in izkoriščanje celotnega potenciala notranjega trga; spodbujajo tržne dejavnosti, ki temeljijo na pošteni konkurenci, s čimer prispevajo k večji donosnosti proizvodnje.
These rules ensure compliance with the same requirement both for imports and products originating from within the Union.
Ta pravila zagotavljajo, da tako uvoženi proizvodi kot proizvodi s poreklom iz Unije izpolnjujejo enake zahteve.
Union rules on marketing standards for agricultural products contribute to improving the economic conditions for the production and marketing and the quality of such products.
Pravila Unije o tržnih standardih za kmetijske proizvode prispevajo k boljšim gospodarskim pogojem za proizvodnjo in trženje ter kakovost takih proizvodov.
The responsibility to enforce Union agri-food chain legislation lies with Member States, whose competent authorities monitor and verify, through the organisation of official controls, that relevant Union requirements are effectively complied with and enforced.
Za izvrševanje zakonodaje Unije o agroživilski verigi so odgovorne države članice, katerih pristojni organi z organiziranjem uradnega nadzora spremljajo in preverjajo, da se zadevne zahteve Unije učinkovito izpolnjujejo in izvršujejo.
Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [7] has established a single legislative framework for the organisation of official controls.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7] je bil vzpostavljen enotni zakonodajni okvir za organizacijo uradnega nadzora.
That framework has significantly improved the efficiency of official controls, the enforcement of Union agri-food chain legislation and the level of protection against risks to human, animal and plant health and animal welfare in the Union and the level of protection of the environment from risks that might arise from GMOs and plant protection products.
Ta okvir je bistveno izboljšal učinkovitost uradnega nadzora, izvrševanje zakonodaje Unije o agroživilski verigi in raven varstva pred tveganji za zdravje ljudi, živali in rastlin ter dobrobit živali v Uniji ter raven varstva okolja pred tveganji, ki bi jih lahko povzročili GSO in fitofarmacevtska sredstva.
It has also provided a consolidated legal framework to support an integrated approach towards the performance of official controls along the agri-food chain.
Zagotovil je tudi konsolidiran pravni okvir za podpiranje celostnega pristopa k izvajanju uradnega nadzora v agroživilski verigi.
There are a number of provisions in Union agri-food chain legislation, the enforcement of which has not, or has only partially, been governed by Regulation (EC) No 882/2004.
V zakonodaji Unije o agroživilski verigi je več določb, katerih izvrševanja Uredba (ES) št. 882/2004 ne ureja ali ga ureja le delno.
In particular, specific official control rules were kept in place in Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8].
Posebna pravila o uradnem nadzoru so se ohranila zlasti v Uredbi (ES) št. 1069/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8].
Plant health also largely falls outside the scope of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 with certain rules on official controls being laid down in Council Directive 2000/29/EC [9].
Zdravje rastlin v glavnem tudi ne spada na področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004, saj so nekatera pravila o uradnem nadzoru določena v Direktivi Sveta 2000/29/ES [9].
Council Directive 96/23/EC [10] also provides a very detailed set of rules that establish inter alia the minimum frequency of official controls and specific enforcement measures to be adopted in cases of non-compliance.
Tudi Direktiva Sveta 96/23/ES [10] zagotavlja zelo podrobno zbirko pravil, ki med drugim določajo najmanjšo pogostost uradnega nadzora in posebne izvršilne ukrepe, ki se sprejmejo v primerih neskladnosti.
In order to rationalise and simplify the overall legislative framework, whilst simultaneously pursuing the objective of better regulation, the rules applicable to official controls in specific areas should be integrated into a single legislative framework for official controls.
Da bi racionalizirali in poenostavili celotni zakonodajni okvir ter hkrati uresničevali cilj glede boljše priprave zakonodaje, bi bilo treba pravila, ki se uporabljajo za uradni nadzor na posebnih področjih, vključiti v enotni zakonodajni okvir za uradni nadzor.
For that purpose, Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 and other Union acts currently governing official controls in specific areas should be repealed and replaced by this Regulation.
Zato bi bilo treba razveljaviti Uredbo (ES) št. 882/2004 in druge akte Unije, ki trenutno urejajo uradni nadzor na posebnih področjih, ter jih nadomestiti s to uredbo.
This Regulation should seek to establish a harmonised Union framework for the organisation of official controls, and official activities other than official controls, along the entire agri-food chain, taking into account the rules on official controls laid down in Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 and in relevant sectoral legislation, and the experience gained from the application of those rules.
Cilj te uredbe bi morala biti vzpostavitev usklajenega okvira Unije za organizacijo uradnega nadzora in uradnih dejavnosti, ki niso uradni nadzor, v celotni agroživilski verigi ob upoštevanju pravil o uradnem nadzoru iz Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004 in zadevne sektorske zakonodaje ter izkušenj, pridobljenih pri uporabi teh pravil.
The rules which set out the requirements for the sustainable use of plant protection products laid down in Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [11] include, in Article 8 thereof, provisions on the inspection of application equipment, which will continue to apply while the rules on official controls of this Regulation do not apply to those inspection activities.
Pravila, ki določajo zahteve glede trajnostne rabe fitofarmacevtskih sredstev iz Direktive 2009/128/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11], v členu 8 navedene direktive zajemajo določbe glede pregleda naprav za nanašanje, ki se bodo še naprej uporabljale, dokler se pravila o uradnem nadzoru iz te uredbe ne uporabljajo za navedene dejavnosti pregleda.
For the verification of compliance with the rules on the common organisation of the markets of agricultural products (arable crops, wine, olive oil, fruit and vegetables, hops, milk and milk products, beef and veal, sheepmeat and goatmeat and honey), a well-established and specific control system is already in place.
Za preverjanje skladnosti s pravili o skupni ureditvi trgov kmetijskih proizvodov (poljščin, vina, oljčnega olja, sadja in zelenjave, hmelja, mleka in mlečnih izdelkov, govedine in teletine, ovčjega in kozjega mesa ter medu) se že uporablja dobro uveljavljen posebni nadzorni sistem.
This Regulation should therefore not apply to the verification of compliance with Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [12] governing the common organisations of the markets in agricultural products, except where the controls carried out in relation to marketing standards under Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [13] indicate possible cases of fraudulent or deceptive practices.
Ta uredba se zato ne bi smela uporabljati za preverjanje skladnosti z Uredbo (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12], ki ureja skupno ureditev trgov kmetijskih proizvodov, razen kadar nadzor, ki se izvede v zvezi s tržnimi standardi na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13] kaže na možne primere goljufivih ali zavajajočih praks.
Certain definitions currently set out in Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 should be adapted to take account of the broader scope of this Regulation, to align them with those set out in other Union acts, and to clarify or, where appropriate, replace terminology having different meanings in different sectors.
Nekatere sedanje opredelitve pojmov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004 bi bilo treba prilagoditi, da se upošteva širše področje uporabe te uredbe, da se uskladijo z opredelitvami pojmov iz drugih aktov Unije in da se razjasni ali po potrebi nadomesti terminologija, ki ima v drugih sektorjih drugačen pomen.
Where Union agri-food chain legislation requires the competent authorities to verify that the operators comply with the relevant Union rules and that the animals or goods meet specific requirements for the purpose of issuing official certificates or attestations, such verification of compliance should be considered as an official control.
Kadar je v zakonodaji Unije o agroživilski verigi določeno, da morajo pristojni organi za namen izdaje uradnega spričevala ali potrdila preveriti, da izvajalci dejavnosti izpolnjujejo relevantna pravila Unije in da živali ali blago izpolnjujejo posebne zahteve, bi bilo treba takšno preverjanje skladnosti šteti za uradni nadzor.
Union agri-food chain legislation entrusts additionally the competent authorities of the Member States with specialised tasks to be carried out for the protection of animal health, plant health and animal welfare and for the protection of the environment in relation to GMOs and plant protection products.
V skladu z zakonodajo Unije o agroživilski verigi so pristojni organi držav članic pooblaščeni tudi za izvajanje posebnih nalog za zagotavljanje zdravja živali in rastlin ter dobrobiti živali oziroma varstva okolja v zvezi z GSO in fitofarmacevtskimi sredstvi.
Those tasks are the public interest activities which the competent authorities of the Member States are required to carry out for the purpose of eliminating, containing or reducing any hazard which may arise for human, animal or plant health, animal welfare or also for the environment.
Te naloge so dejavnosti v javnem interesu, ki so jih pristojni organi držav članic dolžni izvajati za odpravljanje, obvladovanje ali zmanjševanje morebitnih nevarnosti za zdravje ljudi, živali ali rastlin, dobrobit živali ali tudi za okolje.
Those other official activities, which include the granting of authorisations or approvals, the epidemiological surveillance and monitoring, eradication and containment of diseases or pests, as well as the issuance of official certificates or attestations, are governed by the same sectoral rules which are enforced through the official controls and therefore by this Regulation.
Te druge uradne dejavnosti, ki vključujejo izdajo dovoljenj ali odobritev, epidemiološki nadzor in spremljanje, izkoreninjenje in obvladovanje bolezni ali škodljivih organizmov ter izdajo uradnih spričeval ali potrdil, urejajo ista sektorska pravila, ki se izvršujejo z uradnim nadzorom, in torej ta uredba.
Competent authorities should be designated by the Member States for all the areas that fall within the scope of this Regulation.
Države članice bi morale določiti pristojne organe na vseh področjih, za katera se uporablja ta uredba.
While Member States are best placed to identify and decide which are the competent authority or authorities to designate for each area or part thereof, they should also be required to designate a single authority that for each area or part of area ensures appropriately coordinated communication with other Member States’ competent authorities and with the Commission.
Države članice so najprimernejše, da za posamezno področje ali njegov del opredelijo in določijo pristojni organ ali organe, zato bi morale na vsakem področju ali njegovem delu določiti tudi en sam organ, ki zagotavlja ustrezno usklajeno komunikacijo s pristojnimi organi drugih držav članic in Komisijo.
For the performance of official controls aimed at verifying the correct application of Union agri-food chain legislation, and of the other official activities entrusted to Member State authorities by Union agri-food chain legislation, Member States should designate competent authorities which act in the public interest, are appropriately resourced and equipped, and offer guarantees of impartiality and professionalism.
Za izvajanje uradnega nadzora, s katerim se preverja pravilna uporaba zakonodaje Unije o agroživilski verigi, in drugih uradnih dejavnosti, za katere so pooblaščeni organi držav članic v skladu z zakonodajo Unije o agroživilski verigi, bi morale države članice določiti pristojne organe, ki delujejo v javnem interesu, imajo ustrezna sredstva in opremo ter so nepristranski in strokovni.
Competent authorities should ensure the quality, consistency and effectiveness of official controls.
Pristojni organi bi morali zagotavljati kakovost, doslednost in učinkovitost uradnega nadzora.
The correct application and enforcement of the rules falling within the scope of this Regulation require appropriate knowledge of both those rules and the rules of this Regulation.
Za pravilno uporabo in izvrševanje pravil, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te uredbe, je potrebno ustrezno poznavanje takih pravil in pravil te uredbe.
It is therefore important that the staff performing official controls and other official activities are regularly trained on the applicable legislation, in accordance with their area of competence, as well as on the obligations resulting from this Regulation.
Zato je pomembno, da se osebje, ki izvaja uradni nadzor in druge uradne dejavnosti, redno izobražuje o zakonodaji v uporabi na področju njihovih pristojnosti in o obveznostih, ki izhajajo iz te uredbe.
The competent authorities should carry out internal audits or have audits carried out on their behalf, to ascertain compliance with this Regulation.
Pristojni organi bi morali izvajati notranje presoje ali naročiti, da se notranje presoje izvajajo v njihovem imenu, da se zagotovi skladnost s to uredbo.
Those audits should be carried out in a transparent manner and be subject to independent scrutiny.
Te presoje bi se morale izvajati na pregleden način in bi morale biti predmet neodvisnih pregledov.
Operators should have the right, subject to national law, to appeal against the decisions taken by the competent authorities.
Izvajalci dejavnosti bi morali imeti pravico, da se ob upoštevanju nacionalnega prava, pritožijo zoper odločitve pristojnih organov.
The competent authorities should inform operators of that right.
Pristojni organi bi morali izvajalce dejavnosti seznaniti s to pravico.
The competent authorities should ensure that the staff responsible for official controls does not disclose information acquired during the performance of those controls where that information is covered by professional secrecy.
Pristojni organi bi morali zagotoviti, da osebje, pristojno za uradni nadzor, ne razkrije informacij, ki jih pridobi med izvajanjem takega nadzora, kadar za te informacije velja obveznost varovanja poslovne skrivnosti.
Unless there is an overriding interest to justify disclosure, professional secrecy should include information which would undermine the purpose of inspections, investigations or audits, the protection of commercial interests or the protection of court proceedings and legal advice.
Razen če ni nujnega interesa, zaradi katerega bi bilo razkritje upravičeno, bi morala obveznost varovanja poslovne skrivnosti veljati tudi za informacije, katerih razkritje bi lahko škodilo namenu inšpekcijskih pregledov, preiskav ali presoj, varstvu poslovnih interesov ali varstvu sodnih postopkov in pravnega svetovanja.
However, professional secrecy should not prevent competent authorities from publishing factual information on the outcome of official controls regarding individual operators when the operator concerned has been allowed to comment upon it prior to the disclosure and such comments have been taken into account, or released alongside the information being disclosed by the competent authorities.
Vendar pa obveznost varovanja poslovne skrivnosti pristojnim organom ne bi smela preprečiti objave dejstev o rezultatu uradnega nadzora v zvezi s posameznim izvajalcem dejavnosti, kadar se zadevnemu izvajalcu dejavnosti pred razkritjem omogoči, da v zvezi s tem predloži pripombe, ki se upoštevajo ali objavijo skupaj z informacijami, ki jih pristojni organi razkrijejo.
The need to respect professional secrecy is also without prejudice to the obligation for competent authorities to inform the general public where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a food or feed may present a risk for health under Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002.
Potreba po varovanju poslovne skrivnosti tudi ne posega v obveznost pristojnih organov obveščanja javnosti ob utemeljenem sumu, da bi živilo ali krma lahko predstavljala tveganje za zdravje na podlagi člena 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002.
The right of individuals to the protection of their personal data as provided for in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [14] should not be affected by this Regulation.
Ta uredba ne bi smela vplivati na pravico posameznikov glede varstva njihovih osebnih podatkov, kakor je določeno v Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES [14].
These rules should also be without prejudice to situations where disclosure is required by Union or national legislation.
Ta pravila prav tako ne bi smela posegati v primere, v katerih se razkritje zahteva v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali nacionalno zakonodajo.
Competent authorities should perform official controls regularly, on a riskbasis and with appropriate frequency, on all the sectors and in relation to all operators, activities, animals and goods governed by Union agri-food chain legislation.
Pristojni organi bi morali uradni nadzor izvajati redno, na podlagi tveganja in ustrezno pogosto v vseh sektorjih in v zvezi z vsemi izvajalci dejavnosti, dejavnostmi, živalmi in blagom, ki jih ureja zakonodaja Unije o agroživilski verigi.
The frequency of official controls should be established by the competent authorities having regard to the need to adjust the control effort to the risk and to the level of compliance expected in the different situations, including the possible violations of the Union agri-food chain legislation perpetrated through fraudulent or deceptive practices.
Pogostost uradnega nadzora bi morali določiti pristojni organi ob upoštevanju potrebe po prilagoditvi nadzornih prizadevanj tveganju in pričakovani ravni skladnosti v različnih primerih, vključno z morebitnimi kršitvami zakonodaje Unije o agroživilski verigi zaradi goljufivih ali zavajajočih praks.
Accordingly, the likelihood of non-compliance with all the areas of the Union agri-food chain legislation which fall within the scope of this Regulation should be taken into account where adjusting the control efforts.
V skladu s tem bi bilo treba pri prilagoditvi nadzornih prizadevanj upoštevati verjetnost neskladnosti z vsemi področji zakonodaje Unije o agroživilski verigi, ki sodijo na področje uporabe te uredbe.
In some cases, however, and in view of the issuance of an official certificate or attestation which is a pre-requisite for the placing on the market or for the movements of animals or goods, Union agri-food chain legislation requires that official controls be performed irrespective of the level of risk or the likelihood of non-compliance.
V nekaterih primerih pa zakonodaja Unije o agroživilski verigi določa, da je treba zaradi izdaje uradnega spričevala ali potrdila, ki je predpogoj za dajanje na trg ali premike živali ali blaga, uradni nadzor izvajati ne glede na raven tveganja ali verjetnost neskladnosti.
In such cases, the frequency of the official controls is dictated by the certification or attestation needs.
V takih primerih je pogostost uradnega nadzora odvisna od potreb glede izdaje spričevala ali potrdila.
To preserve the effectiveness of official controls in the verification of compliance, no notice should be given prior to performing controls, unless such prior notice is absolutely necessary for the controls to be carried out (for example, in the case of those official controls performed in slaughterhouses during slaughter operations which require the continuous or regular presence of staff or representatives of the competent authorities in the operator’s premises) or the nature of the official control activities requires otherwise (as is particularly the case with regard to audit activities).
Da bi ohranili učinkovitost uradnega nadzora pri preverjanju skladnosti, se pred izvajanjem nadzora ne bi smela izdajati obvestila, razen če je tako predhodno obvestilo nujno potrebno za izvedbo nadzora (na primer pri uradnem nadzoru v klavnici med zakolom, pri katerem je potrebna neprekinjena ali redna navzočnost osebja ali predstavnikov pristojnih organov v prostorih izvajalca dejavnosti) ali zaradi vrste dejavnosti uradnega nadzora (kar velja zlasti v zvezi z dejavnostmi presoj).
Official controls should be thorough and effective and should ensure that Union legislation is applied correctly.
Uradni nadzor bi moral biti temeljit in učinkovit ter zagotavljati, da se zakonodaja Unije pravilno uporablja.
Given that official controls may represent a burden for operators, competent authorities should organise and conduct official control activities taking their interests into account and limiting the said burden to that which is necessary for the performance of efficient and effective official controls.
Ker lahko uradni nadzor pomeni obremenitev za izvajalce dejavnosti, bi morali pristojni organi pri organizaciji in izvajanju dejavnosti uradnega nadzora upoštevati interese izvajalcev dejavnosti in to obremenitev omejiti na to, kar je nujno za učinkovito in uspešno izvedbo uradnega nadzora.
Official controls should be performed by staff who are independent, that is free from any conflict of interest, and in particular who are not in a situation which, directly or indirectly, could affect their ability to carry out their professional duties in an impartial manner.
Uradni nadzor bi moralo izvajati osebje, ki je neodvisno, torej ni v nikakršnem nasprotju interesov, in ki zlasti ni v položaju, ki bi lahko neposredno ali posredno vplival na njihovo sposobnost, da nepristransko opravljajo svoje poklicne obveznosti.
Appropriate arrangements should also be in place to ensure impartiality in cases where official controls are performed on animals, goods, places or activities which belong to a public authority or body.
Sprejeti bi bilo treba tudi ustrezne ureditve, s katerimi bi zagotovili nepristranskost v primeru uradnega nadzora živali, blaga, prostorov ali dejavnosti, ki pripadajo javnemu organu ali telesu.
Official controls should be performed with the same level of care by the competent authorities of the Member State irrespective of whether the rules being enforced apply to activities which are only relevant on the territory of that Member State or to activities which will have an impact on the compliance with Union legislation on animals and goods which are to be moved or placed on the market in another Member State or exported outside the Union.
Pristojni organi držav članic bi morali uradni nadzor izvajati enako skrbno ne glede na to, ali se pravila, ki se izvršujejo, uporabljajo za dejavnosti, ki zadevajo samo ozemlje te države članice, ali dejavnosti, ki bodo vplivale na skladnost z zakonodajo Unije o živalih in blagu, ki se premestijo ali dajo na trg v drugi državi članici ali izvozijo iz Unije.