natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
plasma nano-coatings.
4. julija 2032 za medicinske pripomočke razen medicinskih pripomočkov za vsaditev s področja uporabe Direktive 93/42/EGS.
4 July 2032 to medical devices other than implantable medical devices within the scope of Directive 93/42/EEC.
Točki 1 in 2 se ne uporabljata za:
Points 1 and 2 shall not apply to any of the following:
perfluorooktan sulfonsko kislino in njene derivate, ki so navedeni na seznamu v delu A Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004;
perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and its derivatives, which are listed in Part A of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004;
proizvodnjo snovi kot neizogiben stranski proizvod pri proizvodnji fluorokemikalij z ogljikovo verigo z največ šestimi atomi;
the manufacture of a substance where this occurs as an unavoidable by-product of the manufacture of fluorochemicals with a carbon chain equal to or shorter than 6 atoms;
snov, ki se bo uporabljala ali se uporablja kot transportiran izoliran intermediat, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz točk (a) do (f) člena 18(4) te uredbe;
a substance that is to be used, or is used as a transported isolated intermediate, provided that the conditions in points (a) to (f) of Article 18(4) of this Regulation are met;
snov, sestavino druge snovi ali zmes, ki se bo uporabljala ali se uporablja:
a substance, constituent of another substance or mixture that is to be used, or is used:
v proizvodnji medicinskih pripomočkov za vsaditev s področja uporabe Direktive 93/42/EGS;
in the production of implantable medical devices within the scope of Directive 93/42/EEC;
za fotografske premaze za filme, papir ali tiskarske plošče;
in photographic coatings applied to films, papers or printing plates;
v fotolitografskih postopkih za polprevodnike ali v postopkih jedkanja za sestavljene polprevodnike;
in photo-lithography processes for semiconductors or in etching processes for compound semiconductors;
za zgoščene mešanice pen za gašenje požarov, ki so bile dane v promet pred 4. julijem 2020 ter se bodo uporabljale ali se uporabljajo v proizvodnji drugih mešanic pen za gašenje požarov.
concentrated fire-fighting foam mixtures that were placed on the market before 4 July 2020 and are to be used, or are used in the production of other fire-fighting foam mixtures.
Točka 2(b) se ne uporablja za mešanice pen za gašenje požarov, ki so bile:
Point 2(b) shall not apply to fire-fighting foam mixtures which were:
dane v promet pred 4. julijem 2020 ali
placed on the market before 4 July 2020; or
proizvedene v skladu z odstavkom 4(e), če se, kadar se uporabljajo za namene usposabljanja, emisije v okolje čim bolj zmanjšajo in zbrani iztoki varno odstranijo.
produced in accordance with point 4(e), provided that, where they are used for training purposes, emissions to the environment are minimised and effluents collected are safely disposed of.
Točka 2(c) se ne uporablja za:
Point 2(c) shall not apply to:
izdelke, dane v promet pred 4. julijem 2020;
articles placed on the market before 4 July 2020;
medicinske pripomočke za vsaditev, proizvedene v skladu s točko 4(d)(i);
implantable medical devices produced in accordance with point 4(d)(i);
izdelke, premazane s fotografskimi premazi iz točke 4(d)(ii);
articles coated with the photographic coatings referred to in point 4(d)(ii);
polprevodnike ali sestavljene polprevodnike iz točke 4(d)(iii).“
Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2017/1001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the European Union trade mark
o blagovni znamki Evropske unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 118 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske Unije in zlasti prvega odstavka člena 118 Pogodbe,
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 [2] has been substantially amended several times [3].
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 207/2009 je bila večkrat [2] bistveno spremenjena [3].
Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 [4], which was codified in 2009 as Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, created a system of trade mark protection specific to the Union which provided for the protection of trade marks at the level of the Union, in parallel to the protection of trade marks available at the level of the Member States in accordance with the national trade mark systems, harmonised by Council Directive 89/104/EEC [5], which was codified as Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6].
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 40/94 [4], ki je bila kodificirana leta 2009 z Uredbo (ES) št. 207/2009, je bil uveden poseben sistem Evropske unije za varstvo blagovnih znamk, ki je omogočil varstvo blagovnih znamk na ravni Unije, vzporedno z varstvom blagovnih znamk na ravni držav članic v skladu z nacionalnimi sistemi blagovnih znamk, harmoniziranimi z Direktivo Sveta 89/104/EGS [5], ki je bila kodificirana z Direktivo 2008/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6].
It is desirable to promote throughout the Union a harmonious development of economic activities and a continuous and balanced expansion by completing an internal market which functions properly and offers conditions which are similar to those obtaining in a national market.
Zaželeno je po vsej Uniji spodbujati skladen razvoj gospodarskih dejavnosti in neprekinjeno in uravnoteženo širitev z izpopolnjevanjem notranjega trga, ki ustrezno deluje in ima podobne pogoje kot nacionalni trg.
In order to establish a market of this kind and make it increasingly a single market, not only should barriers to free movement of goods and services be removed and arrangements be instituted which ensure that competition is not distorted, but, in addition, legal conditions should be laid down which enable undertakings to adapt their activities to the scale of the Union, whether in manufacturing and distributing goods or in providing services.
Za to, da bi ustvarili tovrsten trg in ga v čedalje večji meri spreminjali v enotni trg, ni bi bilo nujno le odstraniti ovir prostemu gibanju blaga in storitev in vzpostaviti ureditev, ki zagotavlja, da se konkurenca ne izkrivlja, temveč bi bilo treba ustvariti tudi pravne pogoje, ki omogočajo, da podjetja prilagodijo svoje dejavnosti obsegu Unije, pa naj bo to pri distribuciji blaga ali izvajanju storitev.
For those purposes, trade marks enabling the products and services of undertakings to be distinguished by identical means throughout the entire Union, regardless of frontiers, should feature amongst the legal instruments which undertakings have at their disposal.
Zaradi tega naj blagovne znamke, ki omogočajo razlikovanje proizvodov in storitev podjetij na enak način v vsej Uniji, ne glede na meje, spadajo med pravne instrumente, ki so na voljo podjetjem.
For the purpose of pursuing the Union's said objectives it would appear necessary to provide for Union arrangements for trade marks whereby undertakings can by means of one procedural system obtain EU trade marks to which uniform protection is given and which produce their effects throughout the entire area of the Union.
Za doseganje navedenih ciljev Unije, se zdi nujno predvideti ureditev Unije za blagovne znamke, pri kateri lahko podjetja z enim postopkom pridobijo blagovne znamke EU, ki uživajo enotno varstvo in ki učinkujejo na vsem območju Unije.
The principle of the unitary character of the EU trade mark thus stated should apply unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation.
Tako določeno načelo enotnega značaja blagovne znamke EU bi moralo veljati, razen če ta uredba določa drugače.
The barrier of territoriality of the rights conferred on proprietors of trade marks by the laws of the Member States cannot be removed by approximation of laws.
Ovire teritorialnosti pravic, ki jih imetnikom blagovnih znamk podeljujejo zakoni držav članic, se ne da odstraniti s približevanjem zakonov.
In order to open up unrestricted economic activity in the whole of the internal market for the benefit of undertakings, it should be possible to register trade marks which are governed by a uniform Union law directly applicable in all Member States.
Za začetek neomejene gospodarske dejavnosti na celotnem notranjem trgu bi moralo biti v korist podjetij mogoče registrirati blagovne znamke, ki jih ureja enotno pravo Unije, neposredno uporabljivo v vseh državah članicah.
The experience acquired since the establishment of the Community trade mark system has shown that undertakings from within the Union and from third countries have accepted the system which has become a successful and viable complement and alternative to the protection of trade marks at the level of the Member States.
Izkušnje, pridobljene po uvedbi sistema blagovnih znamk Skupnosti, so pokazale, da je ta sistem uspešno in učinkovito dopolnilo ter alternativa varstvu blagovnih znamk na ravni držav članic in da so ga podjetja v Uniji in tretjih državah sprejela.
The Union law relating to trade marks nevertheless does not replace the laws of the Member States on trade marks.
Pravo Unije v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami kljub temu ne nadomesti prava držav članic o blagovnih znamkah.
It would not in fact appear to be justified to require undertakings to apply for registration of their trade marks as EU trade marks.
Dejansko se ne bi zdelo upravičeno zahtevati od podjetij, naj zahtevajo registracijo svojih blagovnih znamk kot blagovnih znamk EU.
National trade marks continue to be necessary for those undertakings which do not want protection of their trade marks at Union level, or which are unable to obtain Union-wide protection while national protection does not face any obstacles.
Nacionalne blagovne znamke pa so še naprej potrebne za tista podjetja, ki svojih blagovnih znamk ne želijo zaščititi na ravni Unije ali ne morejo pridobiti varstva, ki bi veljala za vso Unijo, na ravni nacionalnega varstva pa se ne soočajo z nobenimi ovirami.
It should be left to each person seeking trade mark protection to decide whether the protection is sought only as a national trade mark in one or more Member States, or only as an EU trade mark, or both.
Vsaki osebi, ki želi zaščititi blagovno znamko, bi morala biti prepuščena odločitev, ali jo bo zaščitila samo kot nacionalno blagovno znamko v eni ali več državah članicah ali samo kot blagovno znamko EU ali kot oboje.
The rights in an EU trade mark should not be obtained otherwise than by registration, and registration should be refused in particular if the trade mark is not distinctive, if it is unlawful or if it conflicts with earlier rights.
Pravic pri blagovni znamki EU se ne bi smelo pridobiti drugače kot z registracijo, registracija pa bi morala biti zavrnjena zlasti, če blagovna znamka nima razlikovalnega značaja, če je nezakonita ali če je v nasprotju s prejšnjimi pravicami.
A sign should be permitted to be represented in any appropriate form using generally available technology, and thus not necessarily by graphic means, as long as the representation is clear, precise, self-contained, easily accessible, intelligible, durable and objective.
Dovoliti bi bilo treba, da je znak prikazan v kakršni koli ustrezni obliki, pri kateri se uporabi splošno dostopna tehnologija, torej ne nujno grafično, pod pogojem, da je prikaz jasen, natančen, samozadosten, zlahka dostopen, razumljiv, trajen in objektiven.
The protection afforded by an EU trade mark, the function of which is in particular to guarantee the trade mark as an indication of origin, should be absolute in the case of identity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services.
Varstvo, ki ga zagotovi blagovna znamka EU in katere funkcija je še posebej v zagotavljanju blagovne znamke kot označbe izvora, bi moralo biti absolutno v primeru enakosti blagovne znamke in znaka ter blaga ali storitev.
The protection should apply also in cases of similarity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services.
Varstvo bi moralo veljati tudi v primerih podobnosti med blagovno znamko in znakom ter blagom ali storitvami.
An interpretation should be given for the concept of similarity in relation to the likelihood of confusion.
Podati je treba razlago pojma podobnosti v zvezi z verjetnostjo zmede.
The likelihood of confusion, the appreciation of which depends on numerous elements and, in particular, on the recognition of the trade mark on the market, the association which can be made with the used or registered sign, the degree of similarity between the trade mark and the sign and between the goods or services identified, should constitute the specific condition for such protection.
Verjetnost zmede, katere ugotavljanje je odvisno od številnih elementov, zlasti od prepoznavnosti blagovne znamke na tržišču, povezovanja, ki ga lahko povzroči uporabljen ali registriran znak, stopnje podobnosti med blagovno znamko ter označenim blagom in storitvami, bi moralo pomeniti poseben pogoj takšnega varstva.
In order to ensure legal certainty and full consistency with the principle of priority, under which a registered earlier trade mark takes precedence over later registered trade marks, it is necessary to provide that the enforcement of rights conferred by an EU trade mark should be without prejudice to the rights of proprietors acquired prior to the filing or priority date of the EU trade mark.
Zaradi zagotovitve pravne varnosti in popolne skladnosti s prednostnim načelom, na podlagi katerega ima predhodno registrirana blagovna znamka prednost pred pozneje registriranimi blagovnimi znamkami, je treba določiti, da uveljavljanje pravic, podeljenih z blagovno znamko EU, ne bi smelo posegati v pravice, ki so jih njihovi imetniki pridobili pred datumom vložitve prijave ali datumom prednostne pravice blagovne znamke EU.
This is in conformity with Article 16(1) of the Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights of 15 April 1994.
To je v skladu s členom 16(1) Sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine z dne 15. aprila 1994.
Confusion as to the commercial source from which the goods or services emanate may occur when a company uses the same or a similar sign as a trade name in such a way that a link is established between the company bearing the name and the goods or services coming from that company.
Če podjetje uporablja znak, ki je enak ali podoben trgovskemu imenu, tako da je pri tem mogoče vzpostaviti povezavo med podjetjem z navedenim imenom ter blagom ali storitvami navedenega podjetja, lahko pride do zmede glede trgovinskega izvora blaga ali storitev.
Infringement of an EU trade mark should therefore also comprise the use of the sign as a trade name or similar designation as long as the use is made for the purposes of distinguishing goods or services.
Kršitve blagovne znamke EU bi zato morale vključevati tudi uporabo znaka kot trgovskega imena ali podobne označbe, če se uporablja za razlikovanje blaga ali storitev.
In order to ensure legal certainty and full consistency with specific Union legislation, it is appropriate to provide that the proprietor of an EU trade mark should be entitled to prohibit a third party from using a sign in comparative advertising where such comparative advertising is contrary to Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
Da bi zagotovili pravno varnost in popolno usklajenost s specifično zakonodajo Unije, bi bilo ustrezno, da bi lahko imetnik blagovne znamke EU tretji osebi prepovedal uporabo znaka v primerjalnem oglaševanju, kadar je to v nasprotju z Direktivo 2006/114/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7].
In order to ensure trade mark protection and combat counterfeiting effectively, and in line with international obligations of the Union under the framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), in particular Article V of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) on freedom of transit and, as regards generic medicines, the ‘Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and public health’ adopted by the Doha WTO Ministerial Conference on 14 November 2001, the proprietor of an EU trade mark should be entitled to prevent third parties from bringing goods, in the course of trade, into the Union without being released for free circulation there, where such goods come from third countries and bear without authorisation a trade mark which is identical or essentially identical with the EU trade mark registered in respect of such goods.
Za zagotovitev varstva blagovnih znamk in učinkovitejšega boja proti ponarejanju ter v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi Unije v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO), zlasti na podlagi člena V Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini, ki se nanaša na prosti tranzit, in – v zvezi z generičnimi zdravili – Deklaracije o sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju, ki jo je 14. novembra 2001 sprejela ministrska konferenca STO v Dohi, bi moral imetnik blagovne znamke EU imeti pravico, da tretjim osebam prepreči, da bi v gospodarskem prometu v Unijo vnesle blago, ne da bi bilo to blago tam sproščeno v prosti promet, če takšno blago prihaja iz tretjih držav in brez dovoljenja nosi blagovno znamko, ki je enaka ali v bistvenem enaka blagovni znamki EU, registrirani za takšno blago.
To this effect, it should be permissible for EU trade mark proprietors to prevent the entry of infringing goods and their placement in all customs situations, including transit, transhipment, warehousing, free zones, temporary storage, inward processing or temporary admission, also when such goods are not intended to be placed on the market of the Union.
V ta namen bi bilo treba dovoliti, da imetniki blagovne znamke EU preprečijo vnos blaga, ki krši pravice, in izvajanje kakršnih koli carinskih postopkov za takšno blago, vključno s tranzitom, pretovarjanjem, skladiščenjem, prostimi conami, začasno hrambo, aktivnim oplemenitenjem ali začasnim uvozom, tudi kadar takšno blago ni namenjeno dajanju na trg v Uniji.
In performing customs controls, the customs authorities should make use of the powers and procedures laid down in Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council [8], also at the request of the right holders.
Carinski organi bi morali pri izvajanju carinskega nadzora uporabljati pooblastila in postopke iz Uredbe (EU) št. 608/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8], tudi na zahtevo imetnikov pravic.
In order to reconcile the need to ensure the effective enforcement of trade mark rights with the necessity to avoid hampering the free flow of trade in legitimate goods, the entitlement of the proprietor of the EU trade mark should lapse where, during the subsequent proceedings initiated before the European Union trade mark court (‘EU trade mark court’) competent to take a substantive decision on whether the EU trade mark has been infringed, the declarant or the holder of the goods is able to prove that the proprietor of the EU trade mark is not entitled to prohibit the placing of the goods on the market in the country of final destination.
Da bi uskladili potrebo po zagotavljanju učinkovitega uveljavljanja pravic iz blagovne znamke s potrebo po odpravi ovir za prosto trgovino z zakonitim blagom, bi moral imetnik blagovne znamke zadevno pravico izgubiti, kadar deklarant ali imetnik blaga v naknadnem postopku pred Sodiščem za blagovne znamke Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sodišče za blagovne znamke EU), pristojnem za sprejemanje meritorne odločitve o morebitni kršitvi blagovne znamke EU, lahko dokaže, da imetnik blagovne znamke EU nima pravice prepovedati dajanja blaga na trg v državi, v katero je namenjeno.
Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 provides that a right holder is to be liable for damages towards the holder of the goods where, inter alia, the goods in question are subsequently found not to infringe an intellectual property right.
V členu 28 Uredbe (EU) št. 608/2013 je določeno, da je imetnik pravice odgovoren za škodo, ki jo imetnik blaga utrpi, če je med drugim naknadno ugotovljeno, da zadevno blago ne krši pravice intelektualne lastnine.
With respect to international non-proprietary names (INN) as globally recognised generic names for active substances in pharmaceutical preparations, it is vital to take due account of the existing limitations on the effect of EU trade mark rights.
Kar zadeva mednarodna nelastniška imena kot svetovno priznana generična imena za aktivne snovi v farmacevtskih preparatih, je ključnega pomena, da se ustrezno upoštevajo obstoječe omejitve učinka pravic iz blagovne znamke EU.
Consequently, the proprietor of an EU trade mark should not have the right to prevent a third party from bringing goods into the Union without being released for free circulation there, based upon similarities between the INN for the active ingredient in the medicines and the trade mark.
Imetnik blagovne znamke EU zato ne bi smel imeti pravice, da tretjim osebam prepreči vnos blaga v Unijo, ne da bi bilo to blago tam sproščeno v prosti promet, zaradi podobnosti med mednarodnim nelastniškim imenom za aktivno sestavino zdravila in blagovno znamko.
In order to enable proprietors of EU trade marks to combat counterfeiting effectively, they should be entitled to prohibit the affixing of an infringing mark to goods and preparatory acts carried out prior to the affixing.
Da bi imetnikom blagovnih znamk EU omogočili učinkovit boj proti ponarejanju, bi morali imeti pravico prepovedati namestitev nedovoljene znamke na blago in nekatere pripravljalne ukrepe, izvedene pred namestitvijo.
The exclusive rights conferred by an EU trade mark should not entitle the proprietor to prohibit the use of signs or indications by third parties which are used fairly and thus in accordance with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters.
Izključne pravice, podeljene z blagovno znamko EU, imetniku ne bi smele omogočati, da tretjim osebam prepove uporabo znakov ali označb, ki se uporabljajo pravično in tako v skladu z dobrimi poslovnimi običaji v industrijskih in trgovinskih zadevah.
In order to ensure equal conditions for trade names and EU trade marks in the event of conflicts, given that trade names are regularly granted unrestricted protection against later trade marks, such use should be only considered to include the use of the personal name of the third party.
Za trgovska imena običajno velja neomejeno varstvo glede na poznejše blagovne znamke, zato bi bilo zaradi zagotavljanja enakih pogojev za trgovska imena in blagovno znamko EU primerno, da bi taka uporaba zajemala samo osebno ime tretje osebe.
It should further permit the use of descriptive or non-distinctive signs or indications in general.
Dovoliti bi se morala tudi splošna uporaba opisnih ali nerazlikovalnih znakov ali označb.
Furthermore, the proprietor should not be entitled to prevent the fair and honest use of the EU trade mark for the purpose of identifying or referring to the goods or services as those of the proprietor.
Poleg tega imetnik ne bi smel imeti pravice prepovedati pravične in poštene uporabe blagovne znamke EU za namene opredelitve ali navajanja blaga ali storitev kot svojih.
Use of a trade mark by third parties to draw the consumer's attention to the resale of genuine goods that were originally sold by or with the consent of the proprietor of the EU trade mark in the Union should be considered as being fair as long as it is at the same time in accordance with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters.
Kadar tretje osebe blagovno znamko uporabljajo, da bi potrošnika opozorile na ponovno prodajo pristnega blaga, ki jih je prvotno prodajal imetnik blagovne znamke EU v Uniji ali so se prodajali z njegovim soglasjem, bi bilo takšno uporabo treba šteti za pravično, če je obenem v skladu z dobrimi poslovnimi običaji v industrijskih in trgovinskih zadevah.