natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, hosting service providers should not be held liable as long as they do not have actual knowledge of illegal activity or information and are not aware of the facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or information is apparent.
Ponudniki storitev gostovanja poleg tega ne bi smeli biti odgovorni, dokler dejansko ne vedo za nezakonito dejavnost ali informacijo oziroma ne poznajo dejstev ali okoliščin, iz katerih je razvidno, da gre za nezakonito dejavnost ali informacijo.
To combat terrorism effectively, efficient exchange of information considered to be relevant by the competent authorities for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences between competent authorities and Union agencies, is crucial.
Za učinkovit boj proti terorizmu je ključnega pomena učinkovita izmenjava informacij, ki jih pristojni organi štejejo za pomembne za preprečevanje, odkrivanje, preiskovanje ali pregon terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, med pristojnimi organi in agencijami Unije.
Member States should ensure that information is exchanged in an effective and timely manner in accordance with national law and the existing Union legal framework, such as Decision 2005/671/JHA, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA [12] and Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council [13].
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti učinkovito in pravočasno izmenjavo informacij v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in obstoječim pravnim okvirom Unije, kot so Sklep 2005/671/PNZ, Sklep Sveta 2007/533/PNZ [12] in Direktiva (EU) 2016/681 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13].
When considering whether to exchange relevant information, national competent authorities should take into account the serious threat posed by terrorist offences.
Pri odločanju, ali izmenjati zadevne informacije, bi morali pristojni nacionalni organi upoštevati resno grožnjo, ki jo predstavljajo teroristična kazniva dejanja.
To strengthen the existing framework on information exchange in combating terrorism, as set out in Decision 2005/671/JHA, Member States should ensure that relevant information gathered by their competent authorities in the framework of criminal proceedings, for example, law enforcement authorities, prosecutors or investigative judges, is made accessible to the respective competent authorities of another Member State to which they consider this information could be relevant.
Za krepitev obstoječega okvira o izmenjavi informacij v boju proti terorizmu, kot je določeno v Sklepu 2005/671/PNZ, bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da so ustrezne informacije, ki jih zberejo njihovi pristojni organi v okviru kazenskih postopkov, na primer organi preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj, tožilci ali preiskovalni sodniki, dostopne zadevnim pristojnim organom druge države članice, za katere menijo, da bi jim bile te informacije lahko pomembne.
As a minimum, such relevant information should include, as appropriate, the information that is transmitted to Europol or Eurojust in accordance with Decision 2005/671/JHA.
Take zadevne informacije bi morale, kot je primerno, vključevati vsaj informacije, ki se posredujejo Europolu ali Eurojustu v skladu s Sklepom 2005/671/PNZ.
This is subject to Union rules on data protection, as laid down in Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council [14] and without prejudice to Union rules on cooperation between competent national authorities in the framework of criminal proceedings, such as those laid down in Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [15] or Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA.
Za to se uporabljajo pravila Unije o varstvu podatkov iz Direktive (EU) 2016/680 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [14], brez poseganja v pravila Unije o sodelovanju med pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi v okviru kazenskih postopkov, kot tista, ki so določena v Direktivi 2014/41/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [15] oziroma Okvirnem sklepu 2006/960/PNZ.
Relevant information gathered by competent authorities of the Member States in the framework of criminal proceedings in connection with terrorist offences should be exchanged.
Ustrezne informacije, ki jih zberejo pristojni organi držav članic v okviru kazenskih postopkov v zvezi s terorističnimi kaznivimi dejanji, bi bilo treba izmenjavati.
The term ‘criminal proceedings’ is understood to cover all stages of the proceedings, from the moment a person is suspected or accused of having committed a criminal offence until the decision on the final determination of whether that person committed the criminal offence concerned has become definitive.
Razume se, da izraz „kazenski postopek“ zajema vse faze postopka, od trenutka, ko je oseba osumljena ali obdolžena storitve kaznivega dejanja, dokler odločba o končni ugotovitvi, ali je ta oseba storila zadevno kaznivo dejanje, ne postane pravnomočna.
Member States should adopt measures of protection, support and assistance responding to the specific needs of victims of terrorism, in accordance with Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and the Council [16] and as further qualified by this Directive.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti ukrepe za zaščito, podporo in pomoč po meri posebnih potreb žrtev terorizma v skladu z Direktivo 2012/29/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [16] in kakor je dodatno določeno v tej direktivi.
A victim of terrorism is that defined in Article 2 of Directive 2012/29/EU, namely a natural person who has suffered harm, including physical, mental or emotional harm or economic loss, insofar as that was directly caused by a terrorist offence, or a family member of a person whose death was directly caused by a terrorist offence and who has suffered harm as a result of that person’s death.
Žrtev terorizma je tista, opredeljena v členu 2 Direktive 2012/29/EU, in sicer kot fizična oseba, ki je utrpela škodo, vključno s fizično, duševno ali čustveno škodo ali ekonomsko izgubo, kolikor jo je neposredno povzročilo teroristično kaznivo dejanje, ali družinski član osebe, katere smrt je bila neposredno povzročena s terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem in ki je utrpel škodo zaradi smrti te osebe.
Family members of surviving victims of terrorism, as defined in that Article, have access to victim support services and protection measures in accordance with that Directive.
Družinski člani preživelih žrtev terorizma, kot je opredeljeno v navedenem členu, imajo dostop do služb za podporo žrtvam in zaščitnih ukrepov v skladu z navedeno direktivo.
The assistance with victims’ compensation claims is without prejudice and in addition to the assistance which victims of terrorism receive from assisting authorities in accordance with Council Directive 2004/80/EC [17].
Pomoč pri odškodninskih zahtevkih žrtev ne posega v pomoč, ki jo žrtve terorizma prejmejo od organov za pomoč v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2004/80/ES [17], in tako pomoč dopolnjuje.
This is without prejudice to the national rules on legal representation for claiming compensation, including through legal aid arrangements, and any other relevant national rules on compensation.
To ne posega v nacionalna pravila glede pravnega zastopanja za uveljavljanje odškodnine, tudi prek ureditve brezplačne pravne pomoči, in katera koli druga ustrezna nacionalna pravila o odškodninah.
Member States should ensure that a comprehensive response to the specific needs of victims of terrorism immediately after a terrorist attack and for as long as necessary is provided within the national emergency-response infrastructure.
Države članice bi morale poskrbeti za vzpostavitev celovitega odziva na posebne potrebe žrtev terorizma takoj po terorističnem napadu in tako dolgo, kot je potrebno, v okviru nacionalne infrastrukture za ukrepanje v izrednih razmerah.
To that end, Member States may set up a single and updated website with all relevant information and an emergency support centre for victims and their family members providing for psychological first aid and emotional support.
V ta namen lahko države članice ustanovijo enotno in posodobljeno spletišče z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami in center za nujno pomoč žrtvam in njihovim družinskim članom, ki zagotavlja psihološko prvo pomoč in čustveno podporo.
Initiatives of Member States in this respect should be supported by making full use of available common assistance mechanisms and resources at Union level.
Pobude držav članic na tem področju bi bilo treba podpreti s celovito uporabo razpoložljivih mehanizmov in virov skupne pomoči na ravni Unije.
Support services should take into account that specific needs of victims of terrorism may evolve over time.
Službe za podporo bi morale upoštevati, da se posebne potrebe žrtev terorizma lahko s časom spreminjajo.
In that regard, the Member States should ensure that support services address in the first place at least the emotional and psychological needs of the most vulnerable victims of terrorism, and inform all victims of terrorism about the availability of further emotional and psychological support including trauma support and counselling.
V zvezi s tem bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da bodo službe za podporo najprej obravnavale vsaj čustvene in psihološke potrebe najbolj ranljivih žrtev terorizma in vse žrtve terorizma obvestile o razpoložljivosti nadaljnje čustvene in psihološke podpore, vključno s pomočjo in svetovanjem po travmatični izkušnji.
Member States should ensure that all victims of terrorism have access to information about victims’ rights, available support services and compensation schemes in the Member State where the terrorist offence was committed.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da imajo vse žrtve terorizma dostop do informacij o pravicah žrtev, razpoložljivih službah za podporo in odškodninskih shemah v državi članici, kjer je bilo storjeno teroristično kaznivo dejanje.
Member States concerned should take appropriate action to facilitate cooperation with each other in order to ensure that victims of terrorism who are residents of a Member State other than that where the terrorist offence was committed, have effective access to such information.
Zadevne države članice bi morale sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe, da bi olajšale medsebojno sodelovanje z namenom, da se žrtvam terorizma s prebivališčem v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri je bilo storjeno teroristično kaznivo dejanje, zagotovi učinkovit dostop do takšnih informacij.
Moreover the Member States should ensure that victims of terrorism have access to long-term support services in the Member State of their residence, even if the terrorist offence took place in another Member State.
Poleg tega bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da imajo žrtve terorizma dostop do služb za dolgoročno podporo v državi članici, v kateri imajo prebivališče, čeprav je bilo teroristično kaznivo dejanje storjeno v drugi državi članici.
As reflected in the revised EU Strategy for Combating Radicalisation and Recruitment to Terrorism of 2014 and in the Conclusions of the Council of the European Union and of the Member States meeting within the Council on enhancing the criminal justice response to radicalisation leading to terrorism and violent extremism of 2015, prevention of radicalisation and recruitment to terrorism, including radicalisation online, requires a long-term, proactive and comprehensive approach.
Kot je razvidno iz revidirane strategije EU za boj proti radikalizaciji in novačenju teroristov iz leta 2014 in sklepov Sveta Evropske unije in držav članic, ki so se sestale v okviru Sveta, za okrepitev odzivanja kazenskega pravosodja na radikalizacijo, ki vodi v terorizem in nasilni ekstremizem, iz leta 2015, je za preprečevanje radikalizacije in novačenja za terorizem, vključno z radikalizacijo na spletu, potreben dolgoročen, proaktiven in celosten pristop.
Such approach should combine measures in the area of criminal justice with policies in the fields of education, social inclusion and integration, as well as the provision of effective deradicalisation or disengagement and exit or rehabilitation programmes, including in the prison and probation context.
Tak pristop bi moral združevati ukrepe na področju kazenskega pravosodja s politikami na področjih izobraževanja, socialnega vključevanja in integracije ter zagotavljanje učinkovitega odpravljanja radikalizacije ali prekinitve vpletenosti ter izhodnih ali rehabilitacijskih programov, tudi med prestajanjem zaporne kazni in v okviru probacije.
Member States should share good practices on effective measures and projects in this field, in particular as regards foreign terrorist fighters as well as returnees, where appropriate in cooperation with the Commission and the relevant Union agencies and bodies.
Države članice bi si morale izmenjati dobre prakse o učinkovitih ukrepih in projektih na tem področju, zlasti v zvezi s tujimi terorističnimi borci in povratniki, po potrebi v sodelovanju s Komisijo in z ustreznimi agencijami in organi Unije.
Member States should pursue their efforts to prevent and counter radicalisation leading to terrorism by coordinating, by sharing information and experience on national prevention policies, and by implementing or, as the case may be, updating national prevention policies taking into account their own needs, objectives and capabilities building on their own experiences.
Države članice bi si morale prizadevati za preprečevanje in zatiranje radikalizacije, ki vodi v terorizem, in sicer z usklajevanjem, izmenjavo informacij in izkušenj o nacionalnih politikah preprečevanja ter z izvajanjem oziroma s posodobitvijo nacionalnih politik preprečevanja ob upoštevanju lastnih potreb, ciljev in zmogljivosti na podlagi lastnih izkušenj.
The Commission should, where appropriate, provide support to national, regional and local authorities in developing prevention policies.
Komisija bi morala po potrebi nacionalnim, regionalnim in lokalnim organom zagotavljati podporo pri razvoju politik preprečevanja.
Member States should, depending on the relevant needs and particular circumstances in each Member State, provide support to professionals, including civil society partners likely to come in contact with persons vulnerable to radicalisation.
Države članice bi morale glede na zadevne potrebe in posebne okoliščine v vsaki državi članici zagotoviti podporo strokovnjakom, vključno s partnerji iz civilne družbe, ki bodo verjetno prišli v stik z osebami, dovzetnimi za radikalizacijo.
Such support measures may include, in particular, training and awareness-raising measures aimed at enabling them to identify and address signs of radicalisation.
Takšni podporni ukrepi lahko zajemajo zlasti usposabljanje in ukrepe za ozaveščanje, s ciljem, da bodo lahko prepoznali in obravnavali znake radikalizacije.
Such measures should, where appropriate, be taken in cooperation with private companies, relevant civil society organisations, local communities and other stakeholders.
Te ukrepe bi bilo po potrebi treba sprejeti v sodelovanju z zasebnimi podjetji, ustreznimi organizacijami civilne družbe, lokalnimi skupnostmi in drugimi deležniki.
Since the objectives of this Directive cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the need for Union-wide harmonised rules, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Ker ciljev te direktive države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi potrebe po harmoniziranih pravilih na ravni Unije lažje dosežejo na takšni ravni, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
This Directive respects the principles recognised by Article 2 TEU, respects fundamental rights and freedoms and observes the principles recognised, in particular, by the Charter, including those set out in Titles II, III, V and VI thereof which encompass, inter alia, the right to liberty and security, freedom of expression and information, freedom of association and freedom of thought, conscience and religion, the general prohibition of discrimination, in particular on grounds of race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, the right to respect for private and family life and the right to protection of personal data, the principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties, covering also the requirement of precision, clarity and foreseeability in criminal law, the presumption of innocence as well as freedom of movement as set out in Article 21(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and in Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [18].
Ta direktiva upošteva načeli, ki ju priznava člen 2 PEU, in spoštuje temeljne pravice in svoboščine ter upošteva načela, ki jih zlasti priznava Listina, vključno z načeli iz naslovov II, III, V in VI Listine, ki med drugim zajemajo pravico do svobode in varnosti, svobodo izražanja in obveščanja, svobodo združevanja ter svobodo misli, vesti in veroizpovedi, splošno prepoved diskriminacije, zlasti na podlagi rase, barve kože, etničnega ali socialnega porekla, genetskih značilnosti, jezika, vere ali prepričanja, političnega ali drugega stališča, pravico do spoštovanja zasebnega in družinskega življenja ter pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov, načeli zakonitosti in sorazmernosti kaznivih dejanj in kazni, ki vključuje tudi zahtevo po natančnosti, jasnosti in predvidljivosti kazenskega prava, domnevo nedolžnosti ter svobodo gibanja, kot je določena v členu 21(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in Direktivi 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [18].
This Directive has to be implemented in accordance with those rights and principles taking also into account the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and other human rights obligations under international law.
To direktivo je treba izvajati v skladu s temi pravicami in načeli, tudi ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah ter drugih obveznosti na področju človekovih pravic na podlagi mednarodnega prava.
This Directive is without prejudice to the Member States’ obligations under Union law with regard to the procedural rights of suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings.
Ta direktiva ne posega v obveznosti držav članic na podlagi prava Unije, kar zadeva procesne pravice osumljenih ali obdolženih oseb v kazenskem postopku.
This Directive should not have the effect of altering the rights, obligations and responsibilities of the Member States under international law, including under international humanitarian law.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela spreminjati pravic, obveznosti in odgovornosti držav članic na podlagi mednarodnega prava, vključno z mednarodnim humanitarnim pravom.
This Directive does not govern the activities of armed forces during periods of armed conflict, which are governed by international humanitarian law within the meaning of those terms under that law, and, inasmuch as they are governed by other rules of international law, activities of the military forces of a State in the exercise of their official duties.
Ta direktiva ne ureja dejavnosti oboroženih sil v času oboroženih spopadov, ki jih ureja mednarodno humanitarno pravo v smislu navedenih pojmov v okviru navedenega prava, in, kolikor jih urejajo druga pravila mednarodnega prava, dejavnosti vojaških sil države pri izvrševanju njihovih uradnih dolžnosti.
The provision of humanitarian activities by impartial humanitarian organisations recognised by international law, including international humanitarian law, do not fall within the scope of this Directive, while taking into account the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Zagotavljanje humanitarnih dejavnosti s strani nepristranskih humanitarnih organizacij, ki jih priznava mednarodno pravo, vključno z mednarodnim humanitarnim pravom, ne spada v področje uporabe te direktive, pri čemer je treba upoštevati sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije.
The implementation of criminal law measures adopted under this Directive should be proportional to the nature and circumstances of the offence, with respect to the legitimate aims pursued and to their necessity in a democratic society, and should exclude any form of arbitrariness, racism or discrimination.
Izvajanje ukrepov kazenskega prava na podlagi te direktive bi moralo biti glede na legitimne cilje in nujnost tovrstnih ciljev v demokratični družbi sorazmerno z vrsto kaznivega dejanja in okoliščinami, v katerih je bilo storjeno, in bi moralo izključevati vse oblike arbitrarnosti, rasizma ali diskriminacije.
Nothing in this Directive should be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic or reporting purposes.
Ničesar v tej direktivi se ne bi smelo razlagati, kot da je namenjeno zmanjšanju ali omejevanju razširjanja informacij za znanstvene ali akademske namene ali namene poročanja.
The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, falls outside the scope of this Directive and, in particular, of the definition of public provocation to commit terrorist offences.
Izražanje radikalnih, polemičnih ali spornih stališč v javnih razpravah o občutljivih političnih vprašanjih ne spada v področje uporabe te direktive in zlasti ne v opredelitev javnega ščuvanja k storitvi terorističnih kaznivih dejanj.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, those Member States are not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and are not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 21 o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, in brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola ti dve državi članici ne sodelujeta pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanju ni zavezujoča in se v njiju ne uporablja.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 22 o stališču Danske, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
This Directive should therefore replace Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA with regard to the Member States bound by this Directive and amend Decision 2005/671/JHA,
Ta direktiva bi zato morala nadomestiti Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ za države članice, ki jih zavezuje ta direktiva, in spremeniti Sklep 2005/671/PNZ –
This Directive establishes minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of terrorist offences, offences related to a terrorist group and offences related to terrorist activities, as well as measures of protection of, and support and assistance to, victims of terrorism.
Ta direktiva določa minimalna pravila glede opredelitve kaznivih dejanj in sankcij na področju terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s teroristično skupino, in kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorističnimi dejavnostmi, ter ukrepov za zaščito žrtev terorizma in podporo ter pomoč zanje.