natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the opponent, the produce from these varieties is known as ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ in Slovenia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro.
Vložnica ugovora v zvezi s proizvodi, ki so bili zakonito na trgu v Republiki Sloveniji, trdi, da bi registracija predlaganega imena ogrozila obstoj identičnega slovenskega imena „Varaždinsko zelje“ kot sorte.
In the Republic of Slovenia, Varaždinsko cabbage has allegedly been produced for more than 75 years.
Registracija predlaganega imena bi povzročila gospodarsko škodo proizvajalcem „Varaždinskega zelja“ v Republiki Sloveniji, saj bi bili prisiljeni opustiti proizvodnjo.
In particular, the market production of fresh Varaždinsko cabbage in Slovenia is estimated around 2800-4000 tonnes per year.
To bi tudi ogrozilo proizvodnjo semen za dve slovenski sorti zelja, ki sta registrirani v skupnem katalogu Evropske unije, tj. Varaždinsko 2 in Varaždinsko 3, saj se njun proizvod v Sloveniji prodaja kot Varaždinsko zelje.
In the opinion of the opponent, the registration of ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ could mislead Slovenian consumers, since producers and consumers in the Republic of Slovenia do not associate ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ with the origin or territory indicated in point 4 of the single document, but above all with quality and suitability for pickling.
Komisija je obravnavala trditve iz utemeljenega ugovora in informacij, predloženih Komisiji v zvezi s posvetovanji med zainteresiranima stranema, ter sklenila, da bi bilo treba ime „Varaždinsko zelje“ registrirati kot ZOP.
The opponent claims that the registration of the proposed name would jeopardise the existence of the identical Slovenian name ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ with regard to the variety, as to the products that were legally on the market of the Republic of Slovenia.
Zahteve za registracijo imena „Varaždinsko zelje“ kot ZOP so izpolnjene.
Registration of the proposed name would result in economic damage for the producers of ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ in the Republic of Slovenia, since they would be forced to abandon production.
Proizvod ima značilnosti, ki so pretežno posledica naravnih in človeških dejavnikov njegovega posebnega geografskega okolja, namreč zlasti visoko vsebnost skupnih fenolov in flavonoidov, visoko vsebnost suhe snovi in izjemno visok delež sladkorja.
This would also jeopardise production of seeds for two Slovenian varieties of cabbage that are registered in the Common Catalogue of the European Union, Varaždinsko 2 and Varaždinsko 3, since their product is sold in Slovenia as the cabbage Varaždinsko.
Visoka vsebnost suhe snovi in izjemno visok delež sladkorja v proizvodu „Varaždinsko zelje“ sta rezultat načina proizvodnje, tj. dejstva, da se proizvod zaradi svoje odpornosti na nizke temperature pušča na polju do pozne jeseni.
The Commission has assessed the arguments provided in the reasoned statements of opposition and in the information provided to the Commission regarding the consultations between the interested parties and it has concluded that the name ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ should be registered as PDO.
Visoka vsebnost skupnih fenolov in flavonoidov v proizvodu „Varaždinsko zelje“ je posledica genetskih lastnosti ter zunanjih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev.
The requirements for the registration of ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ as PDO are fulfilled.
„Varaždinsko zelje“ se proizvaja le iz semena ohranjevalne sorte „Varaždinski kupus“, ki je vpisana v register sort Unije.
The product has characteristics, in particular high total phenol and flavonoid content, high dry matter content and exceptionally high sugar content, which are essentially due to the natural and human factors of its particular geographical environment.
Izraz „ohranjevalna sorta“ pomeni, da se seme proizvaja samo na opredeljenem geografskem območju in nikjer drugje.
The high dry matter content and exceptionally high sugar content of ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ are due to the production method, i.e. the fact that the product, which can tolerate low temperatures, is left in the field until late autumn.
Kar zadeva trditev, da je ime, ki naj bi se registriralo, enakozvočno dvema registriranima sortama zelja in da registracija ogroža obstoj proizvodov iz teh sort, znanih kot Varaždinsko zelje, v Sloveniji, Srbiji, Bosni in Hercegovini, nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji in Črni gori, Komisija glede proizvoda, trženega v Sloveniji, ugotavlja, da izraz „Varaždinsko“, uporabljen kot prilastek besede „zelje“, v Sloveniji označuje le sorto zelja.
The high total phenol and flavonoid content in ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ is due to the product's genetic properties, as well as environmental and growing conditions.
Ime „Varaždinsko zelje“, kakor se uporablja v Sloveniji, nakazuje, da je proizvod iz zelja sorte Varaždinsko.
As regards the claim concerning the misleading nature of the name, the Commission considers that the name refers to the area where the product is produced.
Vendar je uporaba imen sort Varaždinsko 2 in Varaždinsko 3, registriranih v skupnem katalogu sort zelenjadnic Evropske unije, na etiketah še naprej brez časovne omejitve dovoljena za semena in zeljne proizvode, ki se proizvajajo zunaj zadevnega geografskega območja.
It cannot per se mislead consumers on the origin of the product.
V skladu s členom 42 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 se lahko ne glede na registracijo imena „Varaždinsko zelje“ kot ZOP imeni Varaždinsko 2 in Varaždinsko 3 uporabljata na etiketah, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz navedenega člena.
As regards the claim that the name to be registered is homonymous with two registered cabbage varieties and that the registration jeopardises the existence of the produce from these varieties, which is known as Varaždinsko zelje, in Slovenia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro, the Commission observes that, as regards the product marketed in Slovenia, the term ‘Varaždinsko’, used as an attribution of ‘zelie’ (cabbage in Slovenian language), just denotes the variety of the cabbage.
Zlasti pri zadevnem zeljnem proizvodu bi morala biti na etiketi jasno navedena država porekla, Hrvaška pa na njej ne bi smela biti omenjena.
The name ‘Varaždinsko zelje’, as used in Slovenia, indicates that the product consists of a cabbage of the Varaždinsko variety.
S tem se bo poleg tega zagotovilo pravilno informiranje potrošnikov v primerjavi s proizvodom, ki se trži pod registrirano ZOP.
No evidence of the use of the name irrespectively of the cabbage variety was found.
Glede na navedeno bi bilo treba ime „Varaždinsko zelje“ vpisati v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb.
In the light of the above, the function of variety indicator of the term ‘Varaždinsko’ being predominant, the Commission considers not appropriate to grant a transitional period for the use of the Slovenian name ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ as such.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za politiko kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov –
However, the use on labelling of the names of the varieties Varaždinsko 2 and Varaždinsko 3, registered in the common Catalogue of Varieties of Vegetable Species of the European Union, is still allowed for seeds and cabbage products produced outside the geographical area without limitation of time.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
In accordance with Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, notwithstanding the registration of the name ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ as PDO, the names Varaždinsko 2 and Varaždinsko 3 may be used on the labelling provided that the conditions listed thereto are met.
Člen 1
In particular, for the cabbage product, the label should clearly show the indication of the country of origin and not include any allusion to Croatia.
Ime „Varaždinsko zelje“ (ZOP) se registrira.
This will, in addition, guarantee the correct information of consumers in comparison with the product marketed under the registered PDO.
Kadar se v skladu s členom 42(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 izraz „Varaždinsko“ na etiketah uporablja za označevanje sorte zeljnega proizvoda, se v istem vidnem polju in z enako velikimi črkami kot ime navede tudi država porekla.
In the light of the above, the name ‘Varaždinsko zelje’ should be entered in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications.
V takih primerih je na etiketah prepovedana uporaba kakršne koli zastave, emblema, znaka ali druge grafične podobe, ki bi bili lahko za potrošnike zavajajoči, zlasti glede značilnosti, porekla ali izvora proizvoda.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Agricultural Product Quality Policy Committee,
Člen 3
The name in the first paragraph identifies a product from class 1.6.
Za Komisijo
Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed of annex XI of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 [3].Article 2
Predsednik
Where, in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the term ‘Varaždinsko’ is used on labelling with reference to the variety of the cabbage product, the country of origin shall be also indicated in the same field of vision, in letters of the same size as those of the name.
UL L 343, 14.12.2012, str. 1.
In such cases, the use of any flags, emblems, signs or other graphic representations on the labels that might mislead consumers, in particular as regards the characteristics, origin or provenance of the product, shall be prohibited.
UL C 223, 8.7.2015, str. 7.
Article 3
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 z dne 13. junija 2014 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in živil (UL L 179, 19.6.2014, str. 36).
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Vložnica ugovora v skladu s členom 10(1)(b) in (c) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 trdi, da je registracija imena „Varaždinsko zelje“ kot zaščitene označbe porekla v nasprotju s členom 6(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 in da bi ogrozila obstoj identičnega imena proizvoda, ki je bil zakonito na trgu že več kot pet let pred datumom objave iz točke (a) člena 50(2).
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Ime „Varaždinsko zelje“ naj bi bilo v nasprotju z enakozvočnim imenom sorte zelja, ki je registrirana od leta 1967.
Done at Brussels, 18 October 2017.
Sorta „Varaždinski“ je bila leta 1967 vpisana na Seznam domačih in udomačenih tujih semenskih sort kmetijskih rastlin v Socialistični federativni republiki Jugoslaviji (SFRJ).
For the Commission
Leta 1989 je bila na istem seznamu registrirana kot „Varaždinski kupus / Varaždinsko zelje“.
The President
Ime iz prvega odstavka opredeljuje proizvod iz skupine 1.6 Sadje, zelenjava in žita, sveži ali predelani, iz Priloge XI k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 [3].Člen 2
OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.
Kar zadeva trditev glede zavajajočega značaja imena, Komisija meni, da se ime nanaša na območje proizvodnje in samo po sebi ne more zavajati potrošnikov glede porekla proizvoda.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1901
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1901
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Danbo (PGI)]
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Danbo (ZGO))
It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs [2].
Avstrija, Argentina in argentinsko združenje mlečne industrije Centro de la Industria Lechera, Avstralija in avstralsko združenje mlečne industrije Dairy Australia, Nova Zelandija in novozelandsko združenje podjetij v sektorju mleka (Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand), Urugvaj, Urad trgovinskega predstavnika Združenih držav Amerike (Office of the United States Trade Representative) in Konzorcij za obča imena živil Združenih držav Amerike (Common Food Names of the United States) so vložili ugovore na registracijo v skladu s členom 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, Denmark's application to register the name ‘Danbo’ as a protected geographical indication (PGI) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Ti ugovori so se šteli za dopustne na podlagi člena 7(3) navedene uredbe, razen tistega iz Avstrije, ki ni bil vložen v predpisanem roku.
Austria, Argentina together with Centro de la Industria Lechera — Dairy Industry Federation of Argentina, Australia together with Dairy Australia, New Zealand together with Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand, Uruguay, the Office of the United States Trade Representative and the Consortium for Common Food Names of the United States submitted oppositions to the registration pursuant to Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Zadevni ugovori so se nanašali na neizpolnjevanje pogojev iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006, ki ga je nadomestil člen 5 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, pri čemer je bilo zlasti poudarjeno, da „Danbo“ nima posebne kakovosti, slovesa ali drugih značilnosti, ki jih je mogoče pripisati geografskemu poreklu.
These oppositions were deemed admissible under Article 7(3) of that Regulation, except for the one from Austria that was not received within the prescribed time-limit.
Navedeno je bilo tudi, da se ime „Danbo“ ne more šteti za tradicionalno negeografsko ime in da ne obstajajo izjemne okoliščine, ki bi upravičile določitev celotnega ozemlja Danske kot opredeljenega geografskega območja.
The oppositions concerned non-compliance with the conditions laid down in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, replaced by Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, in particular arguing that ‘Danbo’ does not possess a specific quality, reputation or other characteristics that are attributable to the geographical origin.
V ugovorih se je nadalje trdilo, da je ime „Danbo“ postalo generično ime iz člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006, ki sta ga nadomestila člen 6(1) in člen 41 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
They also assert that the name ‘Danbo’ would not qualify as a traditional non-geographical name and that no exceptional circumstances exist that would justify the designation of the whole of Denmark as the delimited geographical area.
V ugovorih je bil naveden tudi pomen proizvodnje in potrošnje proizvoda „Danbo“ v več državah EU in državah nečlanicah EU, nekatere od njih pa imajo zanj poseben pravni standard.
In this respect they pointed out that ‘Danbo’ has been subject to a Codex Alimentarius Standard since 1966 as well as it has been included in the Annex B of the Stresa Convention of 1951.
Ker v določenem roku dogovor ni bil dosežen, bi morala Komisija sprejeti odločitev v skladu s postopkom iz člena 52(3)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
The generic nature of the name would be demonstrated by the fact that ‘Danbo’ has also its own tariff line.
Glede domnevne neskladnosti imena „Danbo“ s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006, ki ga je nadomestil člen 5 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, bi bilo treba poudariti, da ustrezna veljavna določba države ne šteje za izjemni primer, kar zadeva geografske označbe.
The oppositions further indicate the importance of the production and consumption of ‘Danbo’ in several EU and non-EU countries, certain of which have a specific legal standard for it.
Prav tako se več ne zahteva ocena, ali je „Danbo“ „tradicionalno negeografsko ime“.
By letters of 18 September 2012, in accordance with Article 7(5) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission invited the interested parties to engage in appropriate consultations.
Dejansko se registracija „Danbo“ kot ZGO zahteva na podlagi slovesa, ki ga je mogoče pripisati njegovemu geografskemu poreklu v smislu člena 5(2)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 in je podrobno opisan v objavljenem enotnem dokumentu in specifikaciji proizvoda.
Given that no agreement was reached within the designated timeframe, the Commission should adopt a decision in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 52(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
Vlagatelji ugovorov niso predložili utemeljene obrazložitve, ki bi povzročila pomisleke o navedenem opisu.
Concerning the alleged failure of the name ‘Danbo’ to comply with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, replaced by Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, it should be noted that the relevant provision in force does not distinguish a country as an exceptional case for a geographical indication.
Vlagatelji ugovorov so predložili več dokazov, ki domnevno kažejo, da je zadevno ime generično.
Likewise, appreciation whether or not ‘Danbo’ is a ‘traditional non-geographical name’ is not any more required.
Vendar obstoj posebnega standarda Codex Alimentarius za „Danbo“ in vključitev „Danbo“ v Prilogo B h konvenciji iz Strese ne pomeni, da je navedeno ime zaradi tega postalo generično.
The registration of ‘Danbo’ as a PGI is actually applied for on the basis of its reputation that is attributable to its geographical origin within the meaning of Article 5(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 and which is extensively described in the published single document and in the product specification.
Po stalni sodni praksi Sodišča se tarifne oznake nanašajo na carinske zadeve in zato niso relevantne za pravice intelektualne lastnine.
The opponents did not provide a valid reasoning challenging that description.
Poleg tega posredovani omejeni podatki, zlasti o proizvodnji proizvoda „Danbo“ zunaj Evropske unije, niso relevantni ob upoštevanju načela teritorialnosti, inherentnega Uredbi (EU) št. 1151/2012, na podlagi katerega je treba generičnost oceniti glede na ozemlje Unije.
The opponents submitted several pieces of evidence that allegedly show that the name in question is generic.
Meni se, da razumevanje tega izraza zunaj Evropske unije in morebitni obstoj povezanih regulativnih standardov proizvodnje v tretjih državah nista relevantna za to odločitev.
However, having a specific Codex Alimentarius Standard as well as an inclusion of ‘Danbo’ in Annex B to the Stresa Convention does not imply that the said name has become ipso facto generic.
Kar zadeva uvoz takega sira iz tretjih držav v Evropsko unijo, v postopku ugovora niso bili predloženi nobeni dokazi.
As indicated by the Court of Justice in its standing case law, tariff codes relate to customs issues and are therefore not relevant to the intellectual property rights.
Posledično ni podlage, da bi se določenim proizvajalcem v tretjih državah odobrilo prehodno obdobje v skladu s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
Furthermore, the limited data that were submitted concerning, in particular, the production of ‘Danbo’ outside the European Union are not relevant considering the principle of territoriality inherent to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, according to which the possibly generic nature of a name is to be assessed in relation to the territory of the EU.
Povezava med Dansko in proizvodom „Danbo“ temelji na slovesu.
The perception of this term outside the European Union and the possible existence of related regulatory production standards in third countries are not deemed relevant to the present decision.
Danska je predložila številne specializirane publikacije in reference, ki dokazujejo, da med Dansko in proizvodom „Danbo“ obstaja povezava, ki temelji na slovesu.
No evidence has been provided in the opposition procedure as regards imports of such cheese from third countries to the European Union.
Njegov sloves še dodatno potrjuje njegova udeležba na nacionalnih in mednarodnih sejmih ter tekmovanjih in prejem velikega števila nagrad.
As a consequence, there are no grounds for a transitional period under Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 to be granted to specific producers in third countries.
Kar zadeva ozemlje EU, se proizvod „Danbo“ proizvaja predvsem na Danskem in se prav tako trži predvsem na Danskem.
The link between Denmark and Danbo is based on reputation.
Danska je predložila nesporne dokaze, da sta potrošnja in poznavanje proizvoda „Danbo“ močno skoncentrirana na Danskem ter da velika večina danskih potrošnikov priznava njegovo stalno povezavo z Dansko.
Denmark has submitted a high number of specialised publications and references that demonstrate that a reputational link exists between Denmark and Danbo.
Zunaj Danske je poznavanje tega sira izredno omejeno.
Its reputation is further confirmed for its taking part in exhibitions and competitions both nationally and internationally and for winning a large number of awards.
Zaradi takšnega omejenega poznavanja se „Danbo“ ne more šteti za generično ime.
As regards the EU territory, Danbo is produced essentially in Denmark and it is also essentially marketed in Denmark.
Glede na navedeno bi bilo treba ime „Danbo“ vpisati v „register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb“.
Denmark provided undisputed evidence that consumption and knowledge of ‘Danbo’ are heavily concentrated in Denmark, and that the overwhelming majority of the Danish consumers does recognise its persistent link with Denmark.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za politiko kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov –
Outside Denmark, knowledge of this cheese is extremely limited.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Such unawareness may not lead to Danbo being considered a generic name.
Člen 1
In the light of the above, the name ‘Danbo’ should be entered in the ‘register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’.
Ime „Danbo“ (ZGO) se registrira.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Agricultural Product Quality Policy Committee,
Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The name in the first paragraph identifies a product from Class 1.3.
Predsednik
Cheeses set out in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 [4].Article 2
UL L 343, 14.12.2012, str. 1.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
UL L 93, 31.3.2006, str. 12.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
UL C 29, 2.2.2012, str. 14.
Done at Brussels, 18 October 2017.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 z dne 13. junija 2014 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in živil (UL L 179, 19.6.2014, str. 36).
For the Commission
Uredba (EU) št. 1151/2012 je začela veljati 3. januarja 2013.
The President
Razveljavila in nadomestila je Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 510/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila [2].
OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.
V zvezi s tem so poudarili, da za proizvod „Danbo“ od leta 1966 velja standard Codex Alimentarius in da je bil vključen v Prilogo B h konvenciji iz Strese iz leta 1951.
OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.
Poleg tega naj bi generičnost imena dokazovalo dejstvo, da ima proizvod „Danbo“ tudi svojo tarifno postavko.
OJ C 29, 2.2.2012, p. 14.
Ime iz prvega odstavka opredeljuje proizvod iz skupine 1.3 Siri iz Priloge XI k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 [4].Člen 2
amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010 to align the auctioning of allowances with Decision (EU) 2015/1814 of the European Parliament and of the Council and to list an auction platform to be appointed by the United Kingdom
o spremembi Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1031/2010 zaradi uskladitve prodaje pravic na dražbi s Sklepom (EU) 2015/1814 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta in navedbe dražbenega sistema, ki ga imenuje Združeno kraljestvo
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010 [2] provides for rules on the timing, administration and other aspects of the auctioning of allowances under Directive 2003/87/EC.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1031/2010 [2] določa pravila o časovnem načrtu, upravljanju in drugih vidikih dražbe pravic do emisije na podlagi Direktive 2003/87/ES.