natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Regulation (EC) No 1796/1999 of 12 August 1999 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty, and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed, on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People's Republic of China, Hungary, India, Mexico, Poland, South Africa and Ukraine and terminating the anti-dumping proceeding in respect of imports originating in the Republic of Korea (OJ L 217, 17.8.1999, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/90 z dne 26. januarja 2016 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 102/2012 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ukrajine po delnem vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL L 19, 27.1.2016, str. 22).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 of 8 November 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People's Republic of China, India, South Africa and Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2179 z dne 25. novembra 2015 o začetku pregleda Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 102/2012 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila razširjena na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali je njihovo poreklo deklarirano v Republiki Koreji ali ne, da se ugotovi, ali se za določenega korejskega izvoznika lahko odobri izvzetje iz navedenih ukrepov, odpravijo protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu njegovih izdelkov in uvede registracija tega uvoza (UL L 309, 26.11.2015, str. 3).
Implementing Regulation of the Council (EU) No 102/2012 of 27 January 2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People's Republic of China and Ukraine as extended to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from Morocco, Moldova and the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in these countries or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and terminating the expiry review proceeding concerning imports of steel ropes and cables originating in South Africa pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 36, 9.2.2012, p. 1).
Obdobje poročanja je trajalo od 1. oktobra 2014 do 30. septembra 2015.
Implementing Regulation of the Council (EU) No 400/2010 of 26 April 2010 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, and terminating the investigation in respect of imports consigned from Malaysia (OJ L 117, 11.5.2010, p. 1).
Podatki so se zbirali od leta 2008 do konca obdobja poročanja („obdobje preiskave“).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/90 of 26 January 2016 amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in Ukraine following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 19, 27.1.2016, p. 22).
Vložnik je začel izdelek, ki se pregleduje, proizvajati sredi leta 2015.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2179 of 25 November 2015 initiating a review of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, for the purposes of determining the possibility of granting an exemption from those measures to one Korean exporter, repealing the anti-dumping duty with regard to imports from that exporter and making imports from that exporter subject to registration (OJ L 309, 26.11.2015, p. 3).
Zaradi izjemnih proizvodnih stroškov v začetni fazi proizvodnje je bil opravljen drugi izračun na podlagi standardnih stroškov proizvodnje (brez zagonskih stroškov in ob predpostavki visoke stopnje izkoriščenosti proizvodnih zmogljivosti).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1168
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1168
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1169
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1169
fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities covered by the applications for import licences lodged from 1 to 7 July 2016 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 for garlic
o določitvi koeficienta dodelitve, ki se bo uporabil za količine v zahtevkih za uvozna dovoljenja, vloženih od 1. do 7. julija 2016 v okviru tarifnih kvot, odprtih z Uredbo (ES) št. 341/2007 za česen
The quantities covered by the applications for ‘A’ import licences lodged in the first seven calendar days of July 2016, for the subperiod from 1 September 2016 to 30 November 2016, for certain quotas, exceed those available.
Količine v zahtevkih za uvozna dovoljenja „A“, vloženih v prvih sedmih koledarskih dneh meseca julija 2016 za podobdobje od 1. septembra 2016 do 30. novembra 2016, so za nekatere kvote višje od razpoložljivih količin.
The quantities covered by the applications for ‘A’ import licences lodged under Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 for the subperiod from 1 September 2016 to 30 November 2016 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficient set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Za količine v zahtevkih za uvozna dovoljenja „A“, vloženih na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 341/2007 za podobdobje od 1. septembra 2016 do 30. novembra 2016, se uporabi koeficient dodelitve iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Allocation coefficient — applications lodged for the subperiod from 1 September 2016 to 30 November 2016
Koeficient dodelitve – zahtevki, vloženi za podobdobje od 1.9.2016 do 30.11.2016
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has been notified of the classes of interest rate over the counter (OTC) derivatives that certain central counterparties (CCPs) have been authorised to clear.
Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESMA) je bil uradno obveščen o razredih izvedenih finančnih instrumentov, s katerimi se trguje na prostem trgu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: izvedeni finančni instrumenti OTC), za katere imajo določene centralne nasprotne stranke (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CNS) dovoljenje za kliring.
Interest rate OTC derivative contracts can have a constant notional amount, a variable notional amount or a conditional notional amount.
Pogodbe o obrestnih izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC imajo lahko stalen nominalni znesek, spremenljiv nominalni znesek ali pogojni nominalni znesek.
Contracts with a constant notional amount have a notional amount which does not vary over the life of the contract.
Pogodbe s stalnim nominalnim zneskom imajo nominalni znesek, ki se med trajanjem pogodbe ne spreminja.
Contracts with a variable notional amount have a notional amount that varies over the life of the contract in a predictable way.
Pogodbe s spremenljivim nominalnim zneskom imajo nominalni znesek, ki se med trajanjem pogodbe spreminja na predvidljiv način.
Contracts with a conditional notional amount have a notional amount which varies over the life of the contract in an unpredictable way.
Pogodbe s pogojnim nominalnim zneskom imajo nominalni znesek, ki se med trajanjem pogodbe spreminja na nepredvidljiv način.
Conditional notional amounts add complexity to the pricing and risk management associated with interest rate OTC derivative contracts and thus to the ability of CCPs to clear them.
Pogojni nominalni zneski povečujejo kompleksnost pri oblikovanju cen in upravljanju tveganj, povezano s pogodbami o obrestnih izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, in s tem vplivajo na sposobnost CNS, da za njih opravljajo kliring.
A first category should include both financial and non-financial counterparties which, on the date of entry into force of this Regulation, are clearing members of at least one of the relevant CCPs and for at least one of the classes of interest rate OTC derivatives subject to the clearing obligation, as those counterparties already have experience with clearing interest rates OTC derivatives and have already established the connections with those CCPs to clear at least one of those classes.
Prva kategorija bi morala vključevati tako finančne kot nefinančne nasprotne stranke, ki so na dan začetka veljavnosti te uredbe klirinški člani vsaj ene od ustreznih CNS ter vsaj za enega od razredov obrestnih izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC, za katere velja obveznost kliringa, saj imajo navedene nasprotne stranke že izkušnje s kliringom obrestnih izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC in že vzpostavljene povezave s takimi CNS za kliring vsaj enega od navedenih razredov.
The level of activity in OTC derivatives should serve as a basis to differentiate the degree of legal and operational capacity of financial counterparties, and a quantitative threshold should therefore be defined for division between the second and third categories on the basis of the aggregate month-end average notional amount of non-centrally cleared derivatives.
Intenzivnost poslovanja z izvedenimi finančnimi instrumenti OTC bi se morala uporabljati kot podlaga za razločevanje med ravnmi pravne in operativne zmogljivosti finančnih nasprotnih strank in zato bi bilo treba določiti kvantitativni prag za ločevanje med drugo in tretjo kategorijo na podlagi skupnega povprečnega nominalnega zneska izvedenih finančnih instrumentov, za katere se ne izvaja centralni kliring, ob koncu meseca.
Certain alternative investment funds (‘AIFs’) are not captured by the definition of financial counterparties under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 although they have a degree of operational capacity regarding OTC derivative contracts similar to that of AIFs captured by that definition.
Nekateri alternativni investicijski skladi niso zajeti v opredelitvi finančnih nasprotnih strank iz Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012, čeprav delujejo z ravnjo operativne zmogljivosti, kar zadeva pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, ki je podobna ravni alternativnih investicijskih skladov, ki so zajeti v navedeni opredelitvi.
Therefore AIFs classified as non-financial counterparties should be included in the same categories of counterparties as AIFs classified as financial counterparties.
Zato bi morali biti alternativni investicijski skladi, razvrščeni kot nefinančne nasprotne stranke, vključeni v iste kategorije nasprotnih strank kot alternativni investicijski skladi, razvrščeni kot finančne nasprotne stranke.
Therefore, a reasonable time frame for counterparties in the first category to prepare for clearing additional classes, to deal with the increase of client clearing and indirect client clearing and to adapt to increasing volumes of transactions to be cleared should be set at six months.
Zato je potreben razumen časovni okvir za nasprotne stranke v prvi kategoriji, da se bodo lahko pripravile na kliring dodatnih razredov in da bodo lahko obvladale povečanje obsega kliringa za stranke in posredne stranke ter se prilagodile vedno večjemu obsegu transakcij, za katere bo treba opraviti kliring, in sicer bi moral navedeni časovni okvir znašati šest mesecev.
The deferred application should ensure that those contracts are not subject to the clearing obligation for a limited period of time in the absence of implementing acts pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 covering the OTC derivative contracts set out in Annex I to this Regulation and regarding the jurisdiction where the non-Union counterparty is established.
Odložitev začetka uporabe bi morala zagotoviti, da za navedene pogodbe ne velja obveznost kliringa za omejeno obdobje med odsotnostjo izvedbenih aktov v skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012, ki zajemajo pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC iz Priloge I k tej uredbi in v zvezi z jurisdikcijo nasprotne stranke, ki nima sedeža v Uniji.
Competent authorities should be able to verify in advance that the counterparties concluding those contracts belong to the same group and fulfil the other conditions of intragroup transactions pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Pristojni organi bi morali biti sposobni preveriti vnaprej, ali nasprotni stranki, ki sklepata navedene pogodbe, spadata v isto skupino in izpolnjujeta druge pogoje glede transakcij znotraj skupine v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 648/2012.
Unlike OTC derivatives whose counterparties are non-financial counterparties, where counterparties to OTC derivative contracts are financial counterparties, Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 requires the application of the clearing obligation to contracts concluded after the notification to ESMA that follows the authorisation of a CCP to clear a certain class of OTC derivatives, but before the date on which the clearing obligation takes effect, provided the remaining maturity of such contracts at the date on which the obligation takes effect justifies it.
Za razliko od izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC, pri katerih so nasprotne stranke nefinančne nasprotne stranke, Uredba (EU) št. 648/2012 zahteva, da se v primeru nasprotnih strank pri pogodbah o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, ki so finančne nasprotne stranke, obveznost kliringa uporablja za pogodbe, sklenjene po uradnem obvestilu ESMA, ki sledi izdaji dovoljenja CNS za opravljanje kliringa določenega razreda izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC, vendar pred datumom, na katerega začne veljati obveznost kliringa, če preostala zapadlost takih pogodb na datum, na katerega začne veljati obveznost, to upravičuje.
Imposing forward-clearing to OTC derivative contracts concluded before the entry into force of this Regulation, irrespective of their remaining maturity on the date on which the clearing obligation takes effect, could limit counterparties' ability to hedge their market risks adequately and either impact the functioning of the market and financial stability, or prevent them from exercising their usual activities by hedging them by other appropriate means.
Zahteva, da se opravlja retrospektivni kliring (forward-clearing) za pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, sklenjene pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, ne glede na njihovo preostalo zapadlost na datum, na katerega začne veljati obveznost kliringa, bi lahko omejila zmožnost nasprotnih strank, da se ustrezno zavarujejo pred tržnimi tveganji, in vplivala na delovanje trga in finančno stabilnost ali jim preprečila izvajanje običajnih aktivnosti z varovanjem pred navedenimi tveganji na druge ustrezne načine.
Essential elements of the OTC derivative contracts, including the pricing of interest rate OTC derivatives subject to the clearing obligation and concluded before that obligation takes effect, will have to be adapted within short time frames in order to incorporate the clearing that will only take place several months after the contract is concluded.
Bistveni elementi pogodb o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, vključno z oblikovanjem cen obrestnih izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC, za katere velja obveznost kliringa in ki se sklenejo, preden začne navedena obveznost veljati, se bodo morali razmeroma hitro prilagoditi, da se bo lahko vključil kliring, ki bo opravljen šele nekaj mesecev po sklenitvi pogodbe.
Thus, imposing the clearing of OTC derivative contracts concluded before the clearing obligation takes effect for those counterparties could limit their ability to hedge their risks adequately and either impact the functioning and the stability of the market or prevent them from exercising their usual activities if they cannot continue to hedge.
Zato bi zahteva, da navedene nasprotne stranke opravljajo kliring za pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, sklenjene pred začetkom veljavnosti obveznosti kliringa, omejila njihovo zmožnost, da se ustrezno zavarujejo pred tržnimi tveganji, ter vplivala na delovanje in stabilnost trga ali jim preprečila izvajanje običajnih dejavnosti, če se ne bodo sposobne še naprej varovati pred tveganji.
In addition, OTC derivative contracts concluded between counterparties belonging to the same group can be exempted from clearing, provided certain conditions are met, in order to avoid limiting the efficiency of intragroup-risk management processes and therefore, undermine the achievement of the overarching goal of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Poleg tega se lahko pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, sklenjene med nasprotnimi strankami, ki pripadajo isti skupini, izvzamejo iz kliringa, če so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji, da bi se preprečilo omejevanje učinkovitosti postopkov za upravljanje tveganj znotraj skupin in s tem ne bi ogrozilo doseganje poglavitnega cilja Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012.
The classes of over the counter (OTC) derivatives set out in Annex I shall be subject to the clearing obligation.
Obveznost kliringa velja za razrede izvedenih finančnih instrumentov, s katerimi se trguje na prostem trgu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: izvedeni finančni instrumenti OTC), ki so določeni v Prilogi I.
The classes of OTC derivatives set out in Annex I shall not include contracts concluded with covered bond issuers or with cover pools for covered bonds, provided those contracts satisfy all of the following conditions:
Razredi izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC iz Priloge I ne vključujejo pogodb, sklenjenih z izdajatelji kritih obveznic ali s skladi kritnega premoženja za krite obveznice, če navedene pogodbe izpolnjujejo vse naslednje pogoje:
Category 1, comprising counterparties which, on the date of entry into force of this Regulation, are clearing members, within the meaning of Article 2(14) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, for at least one of the classes of OTC derivatives set out in Annex I of this Regulation or in Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2205 [4], of at least one of the CCPs authorised or recognised before that date to clear at least one of those classes;
prva kategorija, v kateri so nasprotne stranke, ki so na datum začetka veljavnosti te uredbe klirinški člani v smislu člena 2(14) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 za vsaj enega od razredov izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC iz Priloge I k tej uredbi ali Priloge I k Delegirani uredbi Komisije (EU) 2015/2205 [4] vsaj ene od CNS z dovoljenjem ali priznanih pred navedenim datumom za opravljanje kliringa za vsaj enega od navedenih razredov;
Category 2, comprising counterparties not belonging to Category 1 which belong to a group whose aggregate month-end average of outstanding gross notional amount of non-centrally cleared derivatives for January, February and March 2016 is above EUR 8 billion and which are any of the following:
druga kategorija, v kateri so nasprotne stranke, ki ne spadajo v prvo kategorijo in ki spadajo v skupino, pri kateri znaša skupna povprečna vrednost ob koncu meseca za neporavnani bruto nominalni znesek izvedenih finančnih instrumentov, za katere se ne izvaja centralni kliring v januarju, februarju in marcu, več kot 8 milijard EUR in ki so kar koli od naslednjega:
alternative investment funds as defined in Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] that are non-financial counterparties;
alternativni investicijski skladi, kot so opredeljeni v členu 4(1)(a) Direktive 2011/61/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5], ki so nefinančne nasprotne stranke;
For the purposes of calculating the group aggregate month-end average of outstanding gross notional amount referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1, all of the group's non-centrally cleared derivatives, including foreign exchange forwards, swaps and currency swaps, shall be included.
Za namene izračuna povprečne vrednosti neporavnanega bruto nominalnega zneska za skupino ob koncu meseca iz točke (b) odstavka 1 se upoštevajo vsi izvedeni finančni instrumenti, za katere se ne izvaja centralni kliring, vključno z valutnimi terminskimi posli, zamenjavami in valutnimi zamenjavami.
Where counterparties are alternative investment funds as defined in Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2011/61/EU or undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities as defined in Article 1(2) of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], the EUR 8 billion threshold referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 of this Article shall apply individually at fund level.
Če so nasprotne stranke alternativni investicijski skladi, kot so opredeljeni v členu 4(1)(a) Direktive 2011/61/EU, ali podjemi za kolektivno vlaganje v prenosljive vrednostne papirje, kot so opredeljeni v členu 1(2) Direktive 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], se prag v višini 8 milijard EUR iz točke (b) odstavka 1 tega člena uporablja posamično na ravni sklada.
In respect of contracts pertaining to a class of OTC derivatives set out in Annex I, the clearing obligation shall take effect on:
V zvezi s pogodbami, ki se nanašajo na razred izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC iz Priloge I, obveznost kliringa začne veljati:
9 July 2017 for counterparties in Category 2;
9. julija 2017 za nasprotne stranke iz druge kategorije;
9 July 2019 for counterparties in Category 4.
9. julija 2019 za nasprotne stranke iz četrte kategorije.
By way of derogation from points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 1, in respect of contracts pertaining to a class of OTC derivatives set out in Annex I and concluded between counterparties other than counterparties in Category 4 which are part of the same group and where one counterparty is established in a third country and the other counterparty is established in the Union, the clearing obligation shall take effect on:
Z odstopanjem od točk (a), (b) in (c) odstavka 1 v zvezi s pogodbami, ki se nanašajo na razred izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC iz Priloge in se sklenejo med nasprotnima strankama, ki nista nasprotni stranki iz četrte kategorije in ki spadata v isto skupino, pri katerih je ena od nasprotnih strank iz tretje države, druga pa iz Unije, obveznost kliringa začne veljati:
9 July 2019 in case no equivalence decision has been adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 for the purposes of Article 4 of that Regulation covering the OTC derivative contracts set out in Annex I of this Regulation in respect of the relevant third country; or
9. julija 2019, če se ni sprejel sklep o enakovrednosti v skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 za namene člena 4 navedene uredbe, ki zajema pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC iz Priloge I k tej uredbi, v zvezi z zadevno tretjo državo; ali
the later of the following dates in case an equivalence decision has been adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 for the purposes of Article 4 of that Regulation covering the OTC derivative contracts set out in Annex I of this Regulation in respect of the relevant third country:
na poznejšega od naslednjih datumov, če se je sprejel sklep o enakovrednosti v skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 za namene člena 4 navedene uredbe, ki zajema pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC iz Priloge I k tej uredbi, v zvezi z zadevno tretjo državo:
60 days after the date of entry into force of the decision adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 for the purposes of Article 4 of that Regulation covering the OTC derivative contracts set out in Annex I of this Regulation in respect of the relevant third country;
60 dni od začetka veljavnosti sklepa, sprejetega v skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 za namene člena 4 navedene uredbe, ki zajema pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC iz Priloge I k tej uredbi, v zvezi z zadevno tretjo državo;
15 years for contracts entered into or novated before 9 October 2016 that belong to the classes in Table 1 set out in Annex I;
15 let za pogodbe, sklenjene ali prenovljene pred 9. oktobrom 2016, ki spadajo v razrede v tabeli 1 iz Priloge I;