natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is not a change in methodology.
Bistvena sprememba v sedanji preiskavi je, da se je Komisija odločila uporabiti podatke o stroških surovin proizvajalca izvoznika.
However, even if the current calculation method was to be regarded as change in methodology, the purpose of the current review investigation is to establish new findings because of changed circumstances with regard to constitutive elements in the dumping calculation, i.e. cost of production.
To ne pomeni spremembe metodologije.
The fact that the exporting producer's own claim with regard to changed circumstances has been accepted, would have justified a change in methodology.
Tudi če bi se sedanja metoda izračuna štela za spremembo metodologije, je namen sedanje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom priti do novih ugotovitev zaradi spremenjenih okoliščin glede sestavnih elementov pri izračunu dampinga, tj. stroškov proizvodnje.
The exporting producer claimed that the Commission should have followed an allocation method for costs of processing that was used in the original investigation.
Dejstvo, da je bila trditev proizvajalca izvoznika glede spremenjenih okoliščin sprejeta, bi upravičevalo spremembo metodologije.
However, this allocation method has been applied under the specific circumstances of using facts available for the determination of the cost of production.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi morala Komisija za stroške obdelave uporabiti metodo razporeditve, ki je bila uporabljena v prvotni preiskavi.
In view of the fact that in the present investigation the Commission uses the exporting producer's own data, the Commission could apply a proper allocation method, something which was not possible in the original investigation because of the use of facts available.
Vendar je bila ta metoda razporeditve uporabljena v posebnih okoliščinah uporabe razpoložljivih dejstev za določitev proizvodnih stroškov.
In addition, the methodology proposed by the exporting producer was solely established for the purpose of this anti-dumping investigation, did not reflect historically used accounting policies, could not be applied to the whole production of the company and did not properly reflect the cost drivers for the production of the product concerned and the like product.
Glede na dejstvo, da Komisija v sedanji preiskavi uporablja podatke proizvajalca izvoznika, bi lahko uporabila ustrezno metodo razporeditve, kar v prvotni preiskavi zaradi uporabe razpoložljivih dejstev ni bilo možno.
Following Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation the Commission decided to use an allocation based on the value added to the cost of raw materials during the manufacturing process, which is a variation on the allocation on the basis of turnover neutralizing the high impact that the cost of raw materials may have on the turnover of each product type.
Poleg tega je bila metodologija, ki jo predlaga proizvajalec izvoznik, določena izključno za to protidampinško preiskavo in ni odražala v preteklosti uporabljenih računovodskih usmeritev, ni je bilo mogoče uporabiti za celotno proizvodnjo družbe ter ni pravilno odražala povzročiteljev stroškov proizvodnje zadevnega in podobnega izdelka.
The same exporting producer claimed that the Commission incorrectly disregarded certain quantities of steel purchased in the calculation of the cost of production.
V skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe se je Komisija odločila uporabiti razporeditev na podlagi dodane vrednosti k stroškom surovin v proizvodnem postopku, kar je različica razporeditve na podlagi prihodkov, ki nevtralizira morebiten velik učinek stroškov surovin na prihodke od vsake vrste izdelka.
The type of raw material used is a criterion in the classification of the product concerned for the ordinary course of trade test and for comparison purposes.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je Komisija pri izračunu stroškov proizvodnje napačno zanemarila določene količine kupljenega jekla.
In order to calculate the cost of raw material for each product type sold by the company, the Commission retained the cost records which matched the specifications required by the classification of the product concerned and which could be directly linked to the sales reported by the company under this classification.
Vrsta uporabljene surovine je merilo pri razvrstitvi zadevnega izdelka za namene preskusa običajnega poteka trgovanja in primerjave.
Grouping raw materials on a different level as proposed by the company was not considered a consistent and reasonable alternative.
Komisija je za izračun stroškov surovin za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki ga je družba prodala, ohranila evidence stroškov, ki so ustrezale specifikacijam, potrebnim za razvrstitev zadevnega izdelka, in ki jih je bilo mogoče neposredno povezati s prodajo, ki jo je družba sporočila v okvire te razvrstitve.
Therefore the claim has to be rejected.
Razvrstitev surovin na drugačni ravni, ki jo je predlagala družba, ni štela za dosledno in razumno nadomestno možnost.
The other exporting producer claimed that the anti-absorption reinvestigation is the investigation which led to the current duty and following Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation the Commission should use the same methodology as in the anti-absorption reinvestigation.
Zato je treba to trditev zavrniti.
This particularly related to (i) the calculation of a single cost of production for each type of the product concerned and the like product, irrespective of whether it was sold on the domestic market or on export markets and (ii) the adjustment in classifying different product types in groups with similar characteristics for the ordinary course of trade test and comparison purposes to account for a specific product type and the exclusion of certain company-specific product types groups.
Drugi proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je ponovna preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev tista, ki je privedla do sedanje dajatve, zaradi česar bi morala Komisija v skladu s členom 11(9) osnovne uredbe uporabiti enako metodologijo kot v ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev.
The investigation that led to the imposition of the duty at its current level is the original investigation.
To se je nanašalo zlasti na (i) izračun posamičnih stroškov proizvodnje za vsako vrsto zadevnega in podobnega izdelka ne glede na to, ali se prodaja na domačem trgu ali na izvoznih trgih, ter (ii) prilagoditev pri razvrstitvi različnih vrst izdelka v skupine s podobnimi lastnostmi za namene preskusa običajnega poteka trgovanja in primerjave, da bi se upoštevala posamezna vrsta izdelka in izključitev nekaterih za družbo specifičnih skupin vrst izdelka.
The anti-absorption reinvestigation did not revise the duty rate for this exporting producer.
Preiskava, ki je privedla do uvedbe dajatve na sedanji ravni, je prvotna preiskava.
Therefore the claim that the Commission should have used the same methodology as in the anti-absorption reinvestigation has to be rejected.
V okviru ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev stopnja dajatve za tega proizvajalca izvoznika ni bila spremenjena.
In the original investigation the cost of production of this exporting producer was based on the production costs of other cooperating exporting producers, without differentiating the products sold domestically from those sold on the export markets.
Zato je treba trditev, da bi morala Komisija uporabiti enako metodologijo kot v ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev, zavrniti.
The claim that the Commission deviated from the methodology applied in the original investigation by calculating a single cost of production for each product type, irrespective of whether it was sold on the domestic market or export markets, is therefore unfounded and the claim has to be rejected.
V prvotni preiskavi so stroški proizvodnje tega proizvajalca izvoznika temeljili na stroških proizvodnje drugih sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov brez razlikovanja med izdelki, ki se prodajajo na domačem trgu, in tistimi, ki se prodajajo na izvoznih trgih.
Regarding the adjustment in the product types groups used for the ordinary course of trade test and comparison purposes, the Commission decided to define more precisely the scope of one product type based on its physical characteristics.
Trditev, da je Komisija odstopala od metodologije, ki je bila uporabljena v prvotni preiskavi, ker je izračunala posamične stroške proizvodnje za vsako vrsto izdelka ne glede na to, ali se prodaja na domačem trgu ali izvoznih trgih, je torej neutemeljena in jo je treba zavrniti.
The exporting producer explained during the verification visit that this type was sold in a niche market and had comparable cost of production to other products in the same group of product types but materially higher prices.
Kar zadeva prilagoditev v skupinah vrst izdelka, ki so bile uporabljene za namene preskusa običajnega poteka trgovanja in primerjave, se je Komisija odločila natančneje opredeliti obseg ene vrste izdelka na podlagi njegovih fizikalnih lastnosti.
The Commission concluded that prices and price comparability were affected and an adjustment for physical characteristics according Article 2(10)(a) of the basic Regulation was justified.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je med preveritvenim obiskom pojasnili, da se je ta vrsta prodajala na nišnem trgu in da so bili stroški njene proizvodnje primerljivi s stroški proizvodnje drugih izdelkov v isti skupini vrst izdelka, vendar so bile njene cene bistveno višje.
It is an issue of precise classification of the characteristics of the product concerned that allows precise classification within the product types and precise comparison.
Komisija je sklenila, da je to vplivalo na cene in njihovo primerljivost ter da je bila prilagoditev zaradi fizikalnih lastnosti v skladu s členom 2(10)(a) osnovne uredbe upravičena.
This adjustment therefore does not constitute a change in methodology and therefore this claim has to be rejected.
Natančna razvrstitev lastnosti zadevnega izdelka je namreč tista, ki omogoča natančno razvrstitev v okviru vrst izdelka in natančno primerjavo.
Following disclosure the exporting producer requested an upward allowance to the export price regarding credits related to the Duty Drawback Scheme and Focus Market Scheme and an allowance for credit costs when constructing normal value.
Zato ta prilagoditev ne pomeni spremembe metodologije in je treba to trditev zavrniti.
However, according to Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation, an adjustment, if warranted, can only be made regarding import charges to the normal value and not to the export price.
Po razkritju je proizvajalec izvoznik zahteval popravek izvozne cene navzgor v zvezi s krediti, povezanimi s shemo za povračilo dajatev in shemo ciljnega trga, ter popravek za stroške kredita pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti.
As concerns the claim for a credit cost adjustment to the constructed normal value, it is noted that such adjustment is only provided under Article 2(10)(g) of the basic Regulation when the normal value is determined on the basis of prices charged and not when, absent such prices, the normal value is constructed.
Vendar se v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe prilagoditev, če je upravičena, lahko izvede le v zvezi z uvoznimi dajatvami za normalno vrednost in ne za izvozno ceno.
Consequently, both claims have to be rejected.
Kar zadeva zahtevek za prilagoditev konstruirane normalne vrednosti zaradi stroškov kredita, je treba omeniti, da je taka prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(g) osnovne uredbe zagotovljena le, kadar je normalna vrednost določena na podlagi zaračunanih cen in ne, kadar je (ob odsotnosti takih cen) konstruirana.
The Commission accepted the claims of this exporting producer concerning the exclusion of certain company-specific product type groups and some clerical errors regarding the double reporting of an allowance, a stock adjustment and the allocation key of processing costs.
Zato je treba oba zahtevka zavrniti.
The acceptance of these claims led to a decrease in the dumping margin of this exporting producer.
Komisija je sprejela trditve tega proizvajalca izvoznika v zvezi z izključitvijo nekaterih za družbo specifičnih skupin vrst izdelka in nekaterimi administrativnimi napakami glede dvojnega poročanja popravka, prilagoditve zalog in ključa za razporeditev stroškov obdelave.
After disclosure, Eurofer claimed to have too limited details in the non-confidential version of the file to provide any meaningful comments on the investigation, nevertheless it supported the conclusions of the Commission.
Sprejetje teh trditev je privedlo do znižanja stopnje dampinga za tega proizvajalca izvoznika.
According to Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation, information which is by nature confidential or which is provided on a confidential basis by parties to an investigation shall be treated as such.
Po razkritju je združenje Eurofer trdilo, da je v nezaupni različici spisa premalo podrobnosti, da bi lahko podalo kakršne koli koristne pripombe glede preiskave, vendar je podprlo sklepe Komisije.
Since the exporting producers have provided non-confidential summaries of any confidential information which permits a reasonable understanding of the substance of the information submitted in confidence, the Commission rejected this claim.
V skladu s členom 19(1) osnovne uredbe se informacije, ki so po naravi zaupne ali jih strani, udeležene v preiskavi, zaupno predložijo, kot take tudi obravnavajo.
The revised dumping margin and duty rate were disclosed to the parties concerned.
Ker sta proizvajalca izvoznika predložila nezaupne povzetke kakršnih koli zaupnih informacij, ki omogočajo primerno razumevanje bistva zaupno predloženih informacij, je Komisija to trditev zavrnila.
Following the additional final disclosure both exporting producers reiterated their previous comments.
Spremenjena stopnja dampinga in stopnja dajatve sta bili razkriti zadevnim stranem.
Following the review investigation, the revised anti-dumping duty rates that would be applicable to imports of the product concerned manufactured by Venus amounts to 6,9 % (i.e. the dumping margin of 9,9 % minus 3 % countervailing duty).
Po dodatnem dokončnem razkritju sta oba proizvajalca izvoznika ponovila svoje predhodne pripombe.
The revised anti-dumping duty rate that would be applicable to imports of the product concerned manufactured by Garg amounts to 10,3 % (i.e. the dumping margin of 13,7 % minus 3,4 % countervailing duty).
Po preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom spremenjena stopnja protidampinške dajatve, ki bi se uporabljala za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvaja skupina Venus, znaša 6,9 % (tj. stopnja dampinga v višini 9,9 %, zmanjšana za izravnalno dajatev v višini 3 %).
Since the revised dumping margin for Garg following final disclosure is not anymore higher than the dumping margin for all other non-cooperating companies in the original investigation, the dumping margin and duty rate for all other non-cooperating companies in the original investigation should not be revised as set out in recital (47) above.
Spremenjena stopnja protidampinške dajatve, ki bi se uporabljala za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvaja družba Garg, znaša 10,3 % (tj. stopnja dampinga v višini 13,7 %, zmanjšana za izravnalno dajatev v višini 3,4 %).
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
Ker spremenjena stopnja dampinga za družbo Gard po dokončnem razkritju ni več višja od stopnje dampinga za vse druge nesodelujoče družbe v prvotni preiskavi, se stopnja dampinga in stopnja dajatve za vse druge nesodelujoče družbe v prvotni preiskavi ne bi smeli spremeniti, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 47.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 –
The table in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1483, shall be replaced by the following table:
Člen 1
Company
Razpredelnica iz člena 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1106/2013, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/1483, se nadomesti z naslednjo razpredelnico:
Duty (%)
Družba
TARIC additional code
Dajatev (v %)
Garg Inox, Bahadurgarh, Haryana and Pune, Maharashtra
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
Viraj Profiles Limited, Palghar, Maharashtra and Mumbai, Maharashtra
Garg Inox, Bahadurgarh, Haryana and Pune, Maharasthra
Companies listed in the Annex
Viraj Profiles Limited, Palghar, Maharasthra, in Mumbai, Maharasthra
See the Annex
Družbe s seznama v Prilogi
All other companies, except the companies included in the sample of the initial investigation and cooperating non-sampled companies
Glej Prilogo
Article 2
Vse druge družbe, razen družb, vključenih v vzorec v prvotni preiskavi, in sodelujočih nevzorčenih družb
Done at Brussels, 8 February 2017.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
Predsednik
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 861/2013 of 2 September 2013 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India (OJ L 240, 7.9.2013, p. 1).
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013 of 5 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India (OJ L 298, 8.11.2013, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 861/2013 z dne 2. septembra 2013 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih žic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije (UL L 240, 7.9.2013, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1483 of 1 September 2015 amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India following an absorption reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 228, 2.9.2015, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1106/2013 z dne 5. novembra 2013 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih žic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije (UL L 298, 8.11.2013, str. 1.)
Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1483 z dne 1. septembra 2015 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1106/2013 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih žic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije, po ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije v skladu s členom 12 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL L 228, 2.9.2015, str. 1).
51).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti (UL L 343, 22.12.2009, str.
OJ C 411, 11.12.2015, p. 4.
Ta uredba je bila razveljavljena z osnovno uredbo.
ANNEX
UL C 411, 11.12.2015, str. 4.
Indian cooperating exporting producers not sampled
PRILOGA
Company name
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki v Indiji, ki niso vključeni v vzorec
KEI Industries Ltd, New Delhi
Macro Bars and Wires, Mumbai, Maharasthra
Macro Bars and Wires, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Nevatia Steel & Alloys, Mumbai, Maharasthra
Raajratna Metal Industries, Ahmedabad, Gujarat
Precision Metals, Mumbai, Maharasthra
Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Hindustan Inox Ltd, Mumbai, Maharasthra
Precision Metals, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Ltd.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/221
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/221
amending for the 259th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations
o dvestodevetinpetdeseti spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 881/2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z organizacijama ISIL (Daiš) in Al-Kaida
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations [1], and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and Article 7a(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 881/2002 z dne 27. maja 2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z organizacijama ISIL (Daiš) in Al-Kaida [1], ter zlasti člena 7(1)(a) in člena 7a(5) Uredbe,
On 3 February 2017, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one natural person from its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.
Odbor za sankcije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov je 3. februarja 2017 sklenil črtati eno fizično osebo s seznama oseb, skupin in subjektov, za katere velja zamrznitev sredstev in gospodarskih virov.
ANNEX
V Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 881/2002 se pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ črta naslednji vnos:
In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002, the following entry under the heading ‘Natural persons’ is deleted:
„Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (tudi (a) Gulabudin Hekmatyar, (b) Golboddin Hikmetyar, (c) Gulbuddin Khekmatiyar, (d) Gulbuddin Hekmatiar, (e) Gulbuddin Hekhmartyar, (f) Gulbudin Hekmetyar).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/222
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/222
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/226
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/226
Toys, put up in the same packing for retail sale, consisting of:
Igrače, pakirane v skupni embalaži za prodajo na drobno, ki so sestavljene iz:
a battery-powered locomotive and a carriage, of plastics,
lokomotive na baterije in vagona, iz plastične mase,
wooden tracks,
lesenih tirov,
traffic signs, cars, human figures, animals, trees, etc.
prometnih znakov, avtomobilov, figuric ljudi, živali, dreves itd.
Classification is determined by general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 950300 and 95030070.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošni pravili 1 in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature ter besedilo oznak KN 950300 in 95030070.
Classification under CN code 95030030 as an ‘electric train, including tracks, signals and other accessories therefor’ is excluded because the ‘set’ also contains other toys of wood and plastics, such as traffic signs, cars, human figures, animals, trees, etc., which are toys in their own merit.
Uvrstitev pod oznako KN 95030030 kot „Električni vlaki, vključno s tiri, signali in drugim priborom zanje“ je izključena, ker „komplet“ vsebuje tudi druge igrače iz lesa in plastike, kot so prometni znaki, avtomobili, figurice ljudi, živali, dreves itd., ki so same po sebi igrače.
Those toys are not directly connected with the electric train and the tracks like a train station, a railway crossing or a railway bridge would be and are consequently not considered as accessories to an electric train (see also the Harmonized System Explanatory Note (HSEN) to heading 9503, (D) (iv)).
Te igrače niso neposredno povezane z električnim vlakom in tiri, kot bi bili železniška postaja, železniški prehod ali železniški most, in se zato ne štejejo za pribor za električni vlak (glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema k tarifni številki 9503, (D), (iv)).
The ‘set’ of toys consists of different types of articles, designed for the amusement of children or adults, put up in the same packing for retail sale (see also the HSEN to chapter 95, General, and the Explanatory notes to CN code 95030070).
„Komplet“ igrač je sestavljen iz različnih vrst izdelkov, namenjenih za igranje otrok ali odraslih, pakirani pa so v skupni embalaži za prodajo na drobno (glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema k poglavju 95, Splošno, in pojasnjevalne opombe k oznaki KN 95030070).
The article is therefore to be classified under CN code 95030070 as ‘other toys, put up in sets’.
Izdelek je zato treba uvrstiti pod oznako KN 95030070, tj. med „Druge igrače, v kompletih ali predlogah“.