natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As also explained in recital (45) below, it was considered that the characteristics of each PCN were detailed enough to capture all the differences between the different product types.
CCCMC je tudi trdila, da bi morala Komisija zbirati informacije o vrstah izdelka, ki se uvažajo iz LRK, in vrstah izdelka, ki jih proizvaja industrija Unije, saj keramične ploščice predstavljajo veliko število izdelkov, ter opraviti analizo za vse (skupine) vrste izdelka (segmente).
Nor did the CCCMC provide any arguments that a more detailed description or distinction was necessary.
Komisija je za opredelitev zadevnega izdelka in razlikovanje med različnimi vrstami izdelka uporabila sedem lastnosti, ki podrobneje opisujejo fizikalne lastnosti, kot so absorpcija vode, končna obdelava (ali so ploščice glazirane/neglazirane, enkrat/dvakrat žgane, barvane/nebarvane, popravljene ali ne), velikost in standardi kakovosti.
The CCCMC also claimed that since ceramic tiles encompassed a large number of products, the Commission should have collected information about product types imported from the PRC and product types produced by the Union industry, and to carry out an analysis per (groups of) product types (segments).
Iste lastnosti so bile že uporabljene v prvotni preiskavi.
To define the product concerned and to distinguish between the different product types, the Commission used seven characteristics detailing physical characteristics such as water absorption, finishing (if the tiles were glazed/unglazed, single/double fired, coloured/non coloured, rectified or not), size and quality standards.
Nobena druga stran ni trdila, da ni odražala vseh razlik med različnimi vrstami izdelka in da se je ista vrsta izdelka, ki se proizvaja v Uniji, razlikovala od iste vrste izdelka v LRK.
These same characteristics were already used in the original investigation.
CCMC prav tako ni zagotovila informacij o tem, katere druge lastnosti bi bile potrebne v zvezi s tem.
No other party claimed that they would not reflect all the differences between the different product types, and that the same product type produced in the Union differed from the same product type product in the PRC.
Komisija je zato trdila, da so lastnosti vsake PCN dovolj podrobne, da zajemajo vse razlike med različnimi vrstami izdelka, kar je omogočilo pošteno primerjavo izdelka (in cene).
Nor did the CCCMC provide any information which other characteristics would be necessary for this matter.
Poleg tega Komisija v zvezi z zahtevkom, da se določene upravičene vrste izdelka razporedijo v segmente in analizirajo ločeno, razen razlik, ki jih zajema PCN, ni zasledila nikakršne objektivne podlage za razporeditev v takšne segmente.
Therefore, the Commission maintained that the characteristics of each PCN were detailed enough to capture all the differences between the different product types, allowing a fair product (and price) comparison.
Ugotovila je tudi, da v prvotni preiskavi ni bilo ločenih skupin izdelkov.
Furthermore, with regard to the claim that certain product types merited to be grouped in a segment and analysed separately, the Commission did not find any objective basis other than the differences captured by the PCN to make such segments.
CCCMC ni utemeljila svoje zahteve s konkretnim predlogom in nobena druga stran ni izrazila mnenja, da bi bila razporeditev nekaterih vrst izdelka v skupine potrebna in upravičena.
It also noted that there were not groups of products distinguished in the original investigation.
Po drugi strani je Komisija menila, da je bila analiza na PCN podrobnejša od analize na segment, ki je določene PCN razporedila v skupine, in je zato ustreznejša.
Moreover, the CCCMC did not substantiate its request with a concrete proposal and no other party submitted that grouping some of the product types would be necessary and justified.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega in brez dodatnih pripomb v zvezi z zadevnimi izdelki in podobnimi izdelki navedla, da so ti izdelki podobni v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
On the other hand, the Commission considered that an analysis per PCN was more detailed than an analysis per segment that grouped certain PCNs together, and therefore, more appropriate.
C. VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVNEGA POJAVA DAMPINGA
Therefore, in view of the above and in absence of any further comments regarding the product concerned and the like product the Commission maintained that these products are alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Uvodne opombe
C. LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
Komisija je v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi iztek veljavnih ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponoven pojav dampinga kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Preliminary remarks
Devetnajst proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov je izpolnilo obrazec za vzorčenje.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping from the Chinese exporting producers.
Po navedbah sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je njihov obseg izvoza keramičnih ploščic v Unijo v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom znašal približno 1,7 milijona m2, kar ustreza približno 11 % celotnega uvoza zadevnega izdelka s Kitajske, ki ga je v istem obdobju zabeležil Eurostat.
Nineteen exporting producers or groups of exporting producers provided the reply to the sampling form.
Celotna proizvodna zmogljivost sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov je po njihovih navedbah znašala 207 milijonov m2, kar je približno 1,5 % ocenjene celotne kitajske proizvodne zmogljivosti (ta je leta 2015 po ocenah znašala 13,9 milijarde m2).
The declared export volume of ceramic tiles to the Union by the cooperating exporting producers was around 1,7 million m2 in the review investigation period corresponding to around 11 % of the total import volumes of the product concerned from China recorded in Eurostat for the same period.
Nadaljnje podrobnosti o proizvodni zmogljivosti v LRK so na voljo v spodnjem oddelku 3(a).
The total declared production capacity of the cooperating exporting producers or groups of exporting producers amounted to 207 million m2 which is roughly 1,5 % of the total estimated Chinese production capacity (estimated at 13,9 billion m2 in 2015).
Komisija je nato ocenila verjetnost nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava dampinga s sklicevanjem na podatke, ki so jih predložile te tri družbe.
Further details on the production capacity in the PRC can be found in Section 3(a) below.
Damping v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
The Commission accordingly assessed the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping by reference to the data provided by these three groups of companies.
Primerljiva država
Dumping during the review investigation period
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi cen, ki so se plačevale ali se plačujejo na domačem trgu, ali konstruirane vrednosti v ustrezni tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“).
Analogue country
Po razkritju je CCCMC ponovno opozorila na te zahtevke.
The CCCMC contested the methodology of analogue country for establishment of the normal value as such, arguing that Section 15 of the Protocol of Accession of China to the WTO had lapsed after 11 December 2016.
Noben od teh uvoznikov ni izkoristil te možnosti.
Thus, according to the CCCMC, normal value for the Chinese exporting producers should be calculated on the basis of their own domestic prices and/or costs.
Zato je bila v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost določena na podlagi podatkov iz primerljive države.
Following the disclosure, the CCCMC reiterated these claims.
Ta argument je bil zato zavrnjen.
The Commission recalled that all Chinese exporting producers had the opportunity to submit MET (‘Market Economy Treatment’) claim forms to enable individual calculations of dumping margins.
V prvotni preiskavi so bile kot primerljiva država za namene določitve normalne vrednosti v zvezi z LRK uporabljene ZDA.
None of these exporters made use of that possibility.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da namerava kot primerljivo državo uporabiti ZDA, in jih pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe.
Therefore, pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, normal value was determined on the basis of data from an analogue country.
Poleg tega je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da so lahko drugi proizvajalci s tržnim gospodarstvom med drugim v Turčiji, Združenih arabskih emiratih („ZAE“), Indiji in Braziliji, ter da bo proučila tudi njih.
This argument was, thus, rejected.
CCCMC je po začetku postopka izrazila pomisleke glede ustreznosti ZDA kot primerljive države.
In the original investigation, the USA was used as analogue country for the purposes of establishing the normal value with regard to the PRC.
Menila je, da ZDA niso primerna primerljiva država, in kot razlog navedla razlike v gospodarskem razvoju med Kitajsko in ZDA ter majhno potrošnjo keramičnih ploščic na trgu talnih oblog v ZDA.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged using the USA as an analogue country and invited parties to comment.
CCCMC je menila, da bi bila izbira Brazilije, Indije, Mehike in Turčije kot primerljive države ustreznejša, saj imajo te države podobno stopnjo razvoja kot LRK in primerljivo domačo potrošnjo.
Moreover, the Notice of Initiation mentioned that other market-economy producers might be located, inter alia, in Turkey, the United Arab Emirates (the ‘UAE’), India and Brazil and would be examined as well.
CET je v zvezi z ZDA trdila, da je na njihovem domačem trgu visoka raven konkurence pri številnih izdelkih, ki so povsem primerljivi s tistimi, ki se izvažajo iz LRK.
The CCCMC raised concerns regarding the appropriateness of the USA as analogue country after the initiation of the case.
Poleg tega je trdila, da imajo ZDA in LRK podoben dostop do surovin in energetskih virov ter da so ZDA zaradi količin, ki se prodajajo na njihovem domačem trgu, reprezentativna izbira za primerljivo državo.
It considered that the USA was not a suitable analogue country alleging that there was an economic development disparity between China and the USA and a low consumption of ceramic tiles for the flooring market in the USA.
Komisija je po prejemu teh pripomb stopila v stik s predstavništvi zgoraj navedenih držav in držav z največjim obsegom uvoza keramičnih ploščic v Unijo, da bi jih zaprosila za pomoč pri opredelitvi proizvajalcev v njihovih državah, ki bi jih lahko pozvala k sodelovanju kot proizvajalce iz primerljive države.
The CCCMC expressed that the choice of Brazil, India, Mexico and Turkey as analogue country would be more appropriate, provided that those countries and the PRC were similar in terms of level of development and had a comparable domestic consumption.
Poleg tega je k sodelovanju pozvala znane proizvajalce in združenja proizvajalcev iz primerljive države.
Regarding the USA, the CET claimed that there was a high level of competition on the domestic market among a wide range of products, fully comparable to those exported from the PRC.
Deset proizvajalcev je izrazilo pripravljenost za sodelovanje v preiskavi.
Moreover, it argued that access to raw material and to energy resources were similar between the USA and PRC and the quantities sold on the USA domestic market made the USA a representative choice of an analogue country.
Proizvajalci so bili iz ZDA (3), Brazilije (2) in Indije (5).
Following these comments, the Commission contacted the representations of the countries mentioned above plus the countries with highest import volumes of ceramic tiles to the Union, in order to ask for their help in identifying producers in their respective countries who could be invited to cooperate as analogue country producers.
Od proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Brazilije eden ni odgovoril, drugi pa je zavrnil sodelovanje.
In addition, requests for cooperation were sent to the known analogue country producers and producers associations.
Od proizvajalcev iz ZDA je eden zavrnil sodelovanje, dva pa sta izpolnila vprašalnik.
They were located in the USA (3), Brazil (2) and India (5), respectively.
Domača potrošnja ZDA je znašala približno 254 milijonov m2.
The Commission sent the analogue country questionnaire to them on 20 January 2017.
Domačih proizvajalcev je bilo najmanj 28.
No reply was received from India.
Poleg tega so uvoženi izdelki, večinoma s poreklom iz LRK, predstavljali 68 % potrošnje (od celotnega obsega uvoza, ki je znašal 49 milijonov m2).
For exporting producers from Brazil, one producer did not reply and the second one withdrew its cooperation.
Razen carin, ki znašajo 8,5–10 %, za uvoz ne veljajo nobene omejitve.
From the USA, one producer withdrew its cooperation and two producers completed the questionnaire.
Proizvajalci ZDA so uporabljali podobne proizvodne postopke kot vzorčeni kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki.
Based on available information, the Commission concluded that the USA had significant production and a satisfactory level of competition on its domestic market.
Sodelujoča proizvajalca iz ZDA sta navedla, da je njuna domača prodaja znašala 2,0 oziroma 2,9 milijona m2.
The USA's domestic consumption was around 254 million m2.
Po razkritju je CCCMC trdila, da ZDA v nobenem primeru niso ustrezna primerljiva država in da Komisija ni uporabila države, v kateri se cena za podoben izdelek oblikuje v okoliščinah, ki so čim bolj podobne okoliščinam v državi izvoza.
There were at least 28 domestic producers.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je najprej opozorjeno, da je Komisija stopila v stik z uradnimi predstavništvi in/ali proizvajalci v Braziliji, Indiji, Indoneziji, Maleziji, Mehiki, Rusiji, Srbiji, na Tajskem, v Tuniziji, Turčiji, Ukrajini, ZAE in ZDA.
Moreover, imports represent 68 % of the consumption, originating mainly from the PRC (from a total import volume of 49 million m2).
Vendar sta sodelovala samo dva proizvajalca, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 59.
Apart from a customs duty of 8,5 %-10 % there are no import restrictions in force.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 60, so ZDA veljale kot ustrezne za primerljivo državo, saj imajo ZDA precejšnjo proizvodnjo, potrošnjo in zadovoljivo raven konkurence na domačem trgu.
The US producers used a similar production process than the Chinese sampled exporting producers.
Zahtevek je bil zato zavrnjen.
The US cooperating producers reported as domestic sales respectively 2,0 and 2,9 million m2.
Po razkritju je en uvoznik izrazil pomisleke glede izbire dveh proizvajalcev ZDA, povezanih s proizvajalci Unije, in določitve normalne vrednosti za LRK na podlagi teh dveh proizvajalcev.
Following the disclosure, the CCCMC claimed that the USA is in any event not an appropriate analogue country and that the Commission failed to use a country in which the price for a like product is formed in circumstances which are as similar as possible to those in the country of export.
Zato je lahko objektivnost podatkov, zbranih od takšnih proizvajalcev, vprašljiva.
With regard to this claim, it is first recalled that the Commission contacted the official representations and/or producers located in Brazil, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Russia, Serbia, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, the UAE, Ukraine and the USA.
Komisija je ugotovila, da tudi če je proizvajalec v primerljivi državi povezan s proizvajalcem Unije, takšna povezava ne razveljavlja ali vpliva na določitev normalne vrednosti [9].
However, as described in recital (59), only two producers cooperated.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenega in dejstva, da ni bilo dodatnih pripomb, sklenila, da so ZDA ustrezna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
As mentioned in recital (60), the USA was considered appropriate as an analogue country because, the USA had significant production, consumption and a satisfactory level of competition on its domestic market.
Normalna vrednost
The claim was therefore rejected.
Kot osnova za določitev normalne vrednosti so bile uporabljene informacije, ki sta jih predložila dva sodelujoča proizvajalca iz primerljive države.
Following the disclosure, one importer raised concerns as to the choice of two US producers related to Union producers and the establishment of the normal value for the PRC on the basis of these two producers.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali je bil celoten obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka sodelujočih proizvajalcev iz primerljive države neodvisnim strankam v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom reprezentativen.
Therefore, the objectiveness of the data collected from such producers may be questionable.
V ta namen je njun celotni obseg prodaje primerjala s celotnim obsegom izvoza zadevnega izdelka vsakega od vzorčenih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Unijo.
The Commission observed that even if a producer in the analogue country is related to Union producer, such a link does not invalidate or affect the determination of the normal value [9].
Komisija je na podlagi tega ugotovila, da se je podobni izdelek na domačem trgu ZDA prodajal v reprezentativnih količinah.
In view of the above and in the absence of any further comments, the Commission concluded that the USA was an appropriate analogue country under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je Komisija na podlagi vrste izdelka primerjala obseg prodaje na trgu ZDA z obsegom izvoza vsakega od vzorčenih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Unijo.
Normal value
Primerjava je pokazala, da se dve neposredno primerljivi vrsti izdelka v ZDA nista prodajali v reprezentativnih količinah.
The information received from the two cooperating producers in the analogue country was used as a basis for the determination of the normal value.
Normalna vrednost teh dveh vrst izdelka je bila zato konstruirana na podlagi njunih prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih stroškov, dobička ter odbitkov, ki so del običajnega poteka trgovanja.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales of the like product to independent customers made by the cooperating analogue country producers during the review investigation period was representative.
Po razkritju je CCCMC trdila, da ni smiselno primerjati obsega prodaje proizvajalcev iz primerljive države na njihovem domačem trgu z obsegom izvozne prodaje kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, saj med njimi ni nikakršne povezave.
To this end, their total sales volumes were compared to the total volume of the product concerned exported by each of the sampled Chinese exporting producers to the Union.
Zato analiza, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, ni povedala ničesar o reprezentativnosti domače prodaje ZDA za te vrste izdelka.
On that basis, the Commission found that the like product was sold in representative quantities on the US domestic market.
Komisija je po analogiji s položajem izračuna dampinga v tržnem gospodarstvu preverila, ali so bile transakcije izvedene v zadostnih količinah na ravni posamezne vrste izdelka v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Second, the Commission compared on a product type basis the sales volume on the US market with the export volumes to the Union by each sampled Chinese exporting producers.
Ker sta ti dve vrsti izdelka predstavljali 0,70 % in 0,09 % prodaje kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, je Komisija menila, da domača prodaja ZDA ni reprezentativna, in konstruirala normalno vrednost.
This comparison showed that two product types directly comparable were not sold in representative quantities in the USA.
Poleg tega je Komisija ugotovila, da uporabljena metodologija ni vplivala na določitev stopnje dampinga.
Therefore, the normal value of these two product types was constructed on the basis of their own SG&A, profit and allowances found in the ordinary course of trade.
Trditev se zato zavrne.
Following the disclosure, CCCMC claimed that it is not meaningful to compare the volume of sales by the analogue country producers on their domestic market to the volume of export sales by the Chinese exporting producers, as there are entirely unrelated with one another.
Komisija je nato določila delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu za vsako vrsto izdelka v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, da bi se odločila, ali bo za izračun normalne vrednosti uporabila dejansko domačo prodajo v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, the analysis carried out by the Commission did not say anything about the representativeness of the US domestic sales for these product types.
Normalna vrednost temelji na dejanski domači ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka ne glede na to, ali je bila njegova prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne:
By analogy to the situation of a dumping calculation in market economies, the Commission verified if the transactions were made in sufficient quantities at an individual product type level in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
če je obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, enaki izračunanim proizvodnim stroškom ali višji od njih, zajemal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka in
As these two product types represented respectively 0,70 % and 0,09 % of the Chinese exporting producer sales, the Commission considered that the US domestic sales were not representative and constructed the normal value.
če je tehtana povprečna prodajna cena te vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od proizvodnih stroškov na enoto.
Moreover, the Commission found that the methodology used had no impact on the establishment of the dumping margin.
V tem primeru je normalna vrednost tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje te vrste izdelka v obdobju preiskave.
Therefore, the claim is rejected.
Normalna vrednost je dejanska domača cena za posamezno vrsto izdelka, in sicer izključno pri dobičkonosni domači prodaji teh vrst izdelka v obdobju preiskave:
The Commission next defined the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market for each product type during the review investigation period in order to decide whether to use actual domestic sales for the calculation of the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
če obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka predstavlja 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka ali
The normal value is based on the actual domestic price per product type, irrespective of whether those sales are profitable or not, if:
če je tehtana povprečna cena te vrste izdelka nižja od proizvodnih stroškov na enoto.
the sales volume of the product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of this product type, and
Analiza domače prodaje je pokazala, da so bile normalne vrednosti desetih vrst izdelka določene na podlagi metode iz uvodne izjave 74, sedmih vrst izdelka pa na podlagi metode iz uvodne izjave 75.
the weighted average sales price of that product type is equal to or higher than the unit cost of production.
Sodelujoča proizvajalca iz ZDA sta prijavila skupno sedemnajst vrst izdelka, sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki pa skupno petnajst vrst izdelka.
In this case, the normal value is the weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that product type during the IP.
Vendar pa je primerjava med vrstami izdelka, ki so jih izvažali kitajski proizvajalci in prodajali proizvajalci iz ZDA, pokazala, da se neposredno ujemata samo dve vrsti izdelka.
The normal value is the actual domestic price per product type of only the profitable domestic sales of the product types during the IP, if:
Majhno število ujemajočih se vrst izdelka je bilo posledica precej kompleksne opredelitve vrst izdelka, ki je vključevala sedem lastnosti in 672 možnih kombinacij (med drugim porcelanast/neporcelanast, sedem vrst delovnih površin, z enojno/dvojno glazuro ali brez glazure).
the volume of profitable sales of the product type represents 80 % or less of the total sales volume of this type, or
Ker je pri izračunih dampinga za namene ujemanja treba upoštevati 100 % izvoza, je bilo potrebnih nekaj prilagoditev.