natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to facilitate, on the basis of Article 4(3) of the Treaty, the work of the customs authorities of the Member States, the Commission should share in such situations the confidential text and other information of the undertaking for the sole purpose of national proceedings.
Da bi na podlagi člena 4(3) Pogodbe olajšali delo carinskih organov držav članic, bi Komisija morala v takih okoliščinah deliti zaupno besedilo in druge informacije o zavezi, in sicer izključno za namen nacionalnega postopka.
Acceptance of the undertaking in relation to the following companies is hereby withdrawn:
Sprejetje zaveze v zvezi z naslednjimi družbami se umakne:
Ltd, together with their related company in the Union
Ltd, skupaj z njihovo povezano družbo v Uniji
Jetion Solar (China) Co.
Jetion Solar (Kitajska) Co.
Ltd, together with its related company in the Union
Ltd skupaj z njeno povezano družbo v Uniji
Where customs authorities have indications that the price presented on an undertaking invoice pursuant to Article 3(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and Article 2(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 issued by one of the companies from which the undertaking was initially accepted by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU does not correspond to the price paid and that therefore those companies may have violated the undertaking, the customs authorities may, if necessary for the purpose of conducting national proceedings, request the Commission to disclose to them a copy of the undertaking and other information in order to verify the applicable minimum import price (‘MIP’) on the day when the undertaking invoice was issued.
Kadar po podatkih carinskih organov kaže, da cena na računu na podlagi zaveze, ki ga je v skladu s členom 3(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 izdala ena od družb, katerih zaveza je bila prvotno sprejeta z Izvedbenim sklepom 2013/707/EU, ne ustreza plačani ceni in da so zato navedene družbe morebiti kršile zavezo, lahko carinski organi, če je to potrebno za izvajanje nacionalnega postopka, zahtevajo, da jim Komisija razkrije izvod zaveze in druge informacije, da preverijo veljavno minimalno uvozno ceno na dan, ko se je račun na podlagi zaveze izdal.
Where that verification reveals that the price paid is lower than the MIP, the duties due as a consequence under Article 8(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 and Article 13(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 shall be collected.
Kadar preverjanje pokaže, da je plačana cena nižja od minimalne uvozne cene, se posledično poberejo dajatve, dolgovane v skladu s členom 8(9) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 in členom 13(9) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037.
Where that verification reveals that discounts and rebates have not been included in the commercial invoice, the duties due as a consequence under Article 3(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and Article 2(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 shall be collected.
Kadar preverjanje pokaže, da popusti in rabati niso bili vključeni v trgovski račun, se poberejo dajatve, dolgovane v skladu s členom 3(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013.
The information in accordance with paragraph 1 may only be used for the purpose of enforcement of duties due under Article 3(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and Article 2(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013.
Informacije v skladu z odstavkom 1 se lahko uporabljajo samo za namen izvrševanja dajatev, dolgovanih v skladu s členom 3(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013 in členom 2(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013.
In this context, customs authorities of the Member States may provide the debtor of those duties with this information for the sole purpose of safeguarding their rights of defence.
V zvezi s tem lahko carinski organi držav članic zagotovijo te informacije dolžnikom navedenih dajatev izključno za namen varovanja njihovih pravic do obrambe.
Such information may under no circumstances be disclosed to third parties.
Take informacije se v nobenem primeru ne smejo razkriti tretjim osebam.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p.
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, p.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/455
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/455
concerning the authorisation of a preparation of Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) as a feed additive for dogs
o izdaji dovoljenja za pripravek iz Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) in Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) kot krmni dodatek za pse
In accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 an application was submitted for the authorisation of the preparation of Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640).
V skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 je bil vložen zahtevek za izdajo dovoljenja za pripravek iz Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) in Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640).
The application concerns the authorisation of the preparation of Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) as a feed additive for dogs to be classified in the additive category ‘technological additives’.
Zahtevek zadeva izdajo dovoljenja za pripravek iz Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) in Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) kot krmni dodatek za pse ter njegovo uvrstitev v kategorijo dodatkov „tehnološki dodatki“.
The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 1 December 2015 [2] that the preparation of Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) je v mnenju z dne 1. decembra 2015 [2] ugotovila, da pripravek iz Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) in Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) nima škodljivega vpliva na zdravje živali in ljudi ali na okolje.
The Authority has also concluded that the addition of the additive to pasteurised milk or to an oat-based product results in an acidification contributing to the preservation of the resulting food intended for dogs.
Agencija je tudi ugotovila, da pasterizirano mleko ali proizvod na osnovi ovsa zaradi dodajanja dodatka zakisata, kar prispeva k ohranitvi nastale hrane, namenjene psom.
The assessment of the preparation of Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied.
Ocena pripravka iz Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) in Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) kaže, da so pogoji za izdajo dovoljenja iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 izpolnjeni.
End of period of authorisation
CFU dodatka/kg posamičnega krmila
CFU of additive/kg of feed material
Kategorija tehnoloških dodatkov.
Category of technological additives.
Funkcionalna skupina: konzervansi
Functional group: preservatives
Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) in Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640)
Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640)
Sestava dodatka
Additive composition
Pripravek iz Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) in Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) z najnižjo skupno vsebnostjo Lactobacillus 1,0 × 108 CFU/g dodatka (z najnižjo vsebnostjo vsakega Lactobacillus 1,0 × 107 CFU/g dodatka)
Preparation of Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640) containing a minimum of total Lactobacilli of 1,0 × 108 CFU/g additive (having a minimum of each Lactobacillus of 1,0 × 107 CFU/g additive)
Lastnosti aktivne snovi
Characterisation of the active substance
Žive celice Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) in Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640)
Viable cells of Lactobacillus fermentum (NCIMB 41636), Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 41638) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCIMB 41640)
Analitska metoda [1]Metoda štetja pri krmnem dodatku: metoda razmaza na plošči z uporabo agarja MRS (EN 15787).
Analytical method [1]Enumeration in the feed additive: spread plate method on MRS agar (EN 15787)
Identifikacija: gelska elektroforeza v pulzirajočem polju (PFGE).
Identification: Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE).
Psi
Dogs
V navodilih za uporabo dodatka in premiksa je treba navesti pogoje skladiščenja.
In the directions for use of the additive and premixture, indicate the storage conditions.
Ta dodatek se uporablja samo v proizvodih, pridobljenih iz ovsa, in pasteriziranem mleku.
This additive shall be used only in oat derived products and pasteurised milk.
Priporočene vrednosti uporabe dodatka:
Recommended use levels of additive:
6 × 108 CFU/kg proizvodov, pridobljenih iz ovsa (vsebnost vlage 90 %);
6 × 108 CFU/kg of oat derived products (90 % moisture content);
2,7 × 1010 CFU/kg pasteriziranega mleka.
2,7 × 1010 CFU/kg of pasteurised milk.
Nosilci dejavnosti poslovanja s krmo zaradi nevarnosti pri vdihavanju, stiku s kožo ali stiku z očmi za uporabnike dodatka in premiksov določijo postopke varnega ravnanja in primerne organizacijske ukrepe.
For users of the additive and premixtures, feed business operators shall establish operational procedures and appropriate organisational measures to address the potential risks by inhalation, dermal contact or eyes contact.
Kadar tveganja ni mogoče zmanjšati na sprejemljivo raven s temi postopki in ukrepi, se dodatek in premiksi uporabljajo z ustrezno osebno zaščitno opremo, vključno z zaščito za kožo.
Where risks cannot be reduced to an acceptable level by these procedures and measures, the additive and premixtures shall be used with appropriate personal protective equipment, including skin protection.
5. april 2027
5 April 2027
Podrobnosti o analitskih metodah so na voljo na naslovu referenčnega laboratorija: http://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EURLs/EURL_feed_additives/Pages/index.aspx.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/456
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/456
Regulation (EU) 2017/458 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2017/458 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
of 15 March 2017
z dne 15. marca 2017
amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 v zvezi z okrepljenim preverjanjem v ustreznih zbirkah podatkov na zunanjih mejah
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular point (b) of Article 77(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti točke (b) člena 77(2) Pogodbe,
The carrying-out of checks at the external borders remains one of the main safeguards of the area without internal border control and significantly contributes to guaranteeing the long-term security of the Union and its citizens.
Izvajanje mejne kontrole na zunanjih mejah je še vedno eden izmed glavnih zaščitnih ukrepov na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah in bistveno prispeva k zagotavljanju dolgoročne varnosti Unije in njenih državljanov.
Such checks are carried out in the interest of all Member States.
Takšna kontrola se izvaja v interesu vseh držav članic.
One of the purposes of such checks is to prevent any threat to the internal security and public policy of the Member States, irrespective of the origin of such threat, including where such a threat derives from Union citizens.
Namen takšne kontrole je med drugim preprečiti kakršno koli grožnjo notranji varnosti in javnemu redu držav članic, ne glede na izvor takšne grožnje, tudi kadar taka grožnja prihaja od državljanov Unije.
Minimum checks based on a rapid and straightforward verification of the validity of the travel document for crossing the border are currently the rule for persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law.
Za osebe, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja po pravu Unije, se trenutno izvaja temeljna mejna kontrola s hitrim in enostavnim preverjanjem veljavnosti potne listine za prestop meje.
The phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters, many of whom are Union citizens, demonstrates the need to reinforce checks at external borders with regard to persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law.
Pojav tujih terorističnih borcev, med katerimi so mnogi državljani Unije, kaže na potrebo po okrepitvi kontrole na zunanjih mejah za osebe, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja po pravu Unije.
The travel documents of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law should therefore be checked systematically, on entry into and on exit from the territory of Member States, against relevant databases for stolen, misappropriated, lost and invalidated travel documents in order to ensure that such persons do not hide their real identity.
Potne listine oseb, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja po pravu Unije, bi bilo zato ob vstopu na ozemlje držav članic in izstopu z njega treba sistematično preveriti v ustreznih zbirkah podatkov o ukradenih, protipravno odtujenih, izgubljenih in razveljavljenih potnih listinah za zagotovitev, da takšne osebe ne prikrivajo svoje resnične identitete.
Member States are obliged to check systematically third-country nationals against all relevant databases on entry.
Države članice morajo državljane tretjih držav ob vstopu sistematično preveriti v vseh ustreznih zbirkah podatkov.
It should be ensured that such checks are also carried out systematically on exit.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da se takšno preverjanje sistematično izvaja tudi pri izstopu.
Border guards should also systematically check persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law against the Schengen Information System (SIS) and other relevant Union databases.
Mejni policisti bi morali tudi osebe, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja po pravu Unije, sistematično preverjati v schengenskem informacijskem sistemu (SIS) in drugih ustreznih zbirkah podatkov Unije.
This should be without prejudice to the consultation of national and Interpol databases.
To ne bi smelo posegati v preverjanje v nacionalnih in Interpolovih zbirkah podatkov.
To that end, the Member States should ensure that their border guards have access at external border crossing points to the relevant national and Union databases, including the SIS and Interpol’s Stolen and Lost Travel Documents (‘SLTD’) database in order to ensure full implementation of this Regulation.
V ta namen bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da imajo njihovi mejni policisti na zunanjih mejnih prehodih dostop do ustreznih nacionalnih zbirk podatkov in zbirk podatkov Unije, vključno s SIS in Interpolovo podatkovno zbirko o ukradenih in izgubljenih potovalnih dokumentih, da se zagotovi celovito izvajanje te uredbe.
Such systematic checks should be carried out in full compliance with relevant Union law, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council and should fully respect human dignity, in accordance with Article 7 of that Regulation.
Takšno sistematično preverjanje bi bilo treba izvajati ob polnem spoštovanju ustreznega prava Unije, vključno z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina), v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ter v celoti upoštevati človekovo dostojanstvo, v skladu s členom 7 navedene uredbe.
In accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, the Member States should deploy appropriate staff and resources in sufficient numbers to carry out systematic checks in order to prevent such checks from causing disproportionate waiting times and hindering the flow of traffic at external borders.
V skladu s členom 15 Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 bi morale države članice napotiti dovolj ustreznega osebja in sredstev za izvajanje sistematične kontrole, da se prepreči, da takšna kontrola povzroči nesorazmerno dolg čas čakanja in oviranje pretoka prometa na zunanjih mejah.
The obligation to carry out systematic checks on entry and on exit applies to the external borders of the Member States.
Obveznost izvajanja sistematične kontrole ob vstopu in izstopu zadeva zunanje meje držav članic.
It also applies, both on entry and on exit, to the internal borders of the Member States for which the verification in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures has already been successfully completed, but for which the decision on the lifting of controls on their internal borders pursuant to the relevant provisions of the relevant Acts of Accession has not yet been taken.
Prav tako zadeva, ob vstopu in izstopu, notranje meje držav članic, za katere se je preverjanje v skladu z veljavnimi postopki schengenske evalvacije že uspešno zaključilo, vendar pa sklep o odpravi nadzora na njihovih notranjih mejah, v skladu z ustreznimi določbami zadevnih aktov o pristopu, še ni bil sprejet.
In order to avoid subjecting persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law to those checks twice when crossing the internal borders of those Member States by land, on exit it should be possible to subject them to those checks on a non-systematic basis, based on a risk assessment.
Da bi preprečili, da bi bila pri osebah, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja po pravu Unije, pri prehajanju notranjih meja navedenih držav članic po kopnem dvakrat opravljena navedena kontrola, bi se jih lahko ob izstopu kontroliralo le nesistematično na podlagi ocene tveganja.
Technological developments have made it possible, in principle, to consult relevant databases in such a way as to have a limited effect on the duration of border crossings, as the checks for both documents and persons can be carried out in parallel.
Tehnološke izboljšave načeloma omogočajo preverjanje v ustreznih zbirkah podatkov na takšen način, da je vpliv na trajanje prehajanja meje omejen, saj se kontroli tako dokumentov kot oseb lahko izvajata vzporedno.
Automatic border control gates could be relevant in that context.
V tem okviru bi bil lahko ustrezen avtomatizirani mejni prehod.
The use of passenger data received in accordance with Council Directive 2004/82/EC, or in accordance with other Union or national law, could also contribute to speeding up the process of carrying out the required checks during the border-crossing process.
Tudi uporaba podatkov o potnikih, prejetih v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2004/82/ES ali v skladu z drugim pravom Unije ali nacionalnim pravom, bi lahko prispevala k pospešitvi procesa izvajanja zahtevane kontrole med postopkom prehoda meje.
It is therefore possible to strengthen checks at external borders, without having a disproportionate negative effect on persons travelling in good faith, in order to better identify those persons who intend to hide their real identity or who are the subject of a relevant alert for security reasons or for arrest.
Zato je mogoče poostriti kontrolo na zunanjih mejah, ne da bi to nesorazmerno negativno vplivalo na osebe, ki potujejo v dobri veri, z namenom, da bi se bolje prepoznavale tiste osebe, ki nameravajo prikriti svojo resnično identiteto ali so bili v zvezi z njimi razpisani ukrepi iz varnostnih razlogov ali za prijetje.
Systematic checks should be carried out at all external borders.
Sistematično kontrolo bi bilo treba izvajati na vseh zunanjih mejah.
However, where the carrying-out of systematic checks against databases at the borders has a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic at the border, Member States should be allowed not to carry out those systematic checks if, on the basis of a risk assessment, it is determined that such a relaxation would not lead to a security risk.
Kadar bi izvajanje sistematične kontrole s preverjanjem v zbirkah podatkov na mejah imelo nesorazmeren učinek na pretok prometa na meji, pa bi se moralo državam članicam dovoliti, da ne izvajajo navedene sistematične kontrole, če se na podlagi ocene tveganja ugotovi, da takšna delna opustitev ne bi vodila do varnostnega tveganja.
Such a risk assessment should be transmitted to the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (‘the Agency’), established by Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and the Council, and be the subject of regular reporting both to the Commission and to the Agency.
Takšno oceno tveganja bi bilo treba sporočiti Evropski agenciji za mejno in obalno stražo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija), ustanovljeni z Uredbo (EU) 2016/1624 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, o njej pa bi bilo treba redno poročati Komisiji in Agenciji.
The possibility not to carry out those systematic checks should, however, only apply for a limited transitional period with regard to air borders.
Vendar bi se morala možnost, da se taka sistematična kontrola ne izvaja, uporabljati za zračne meje samo v omejenem prehodnem obdobju.
At the border crossing points where those systematic checks are not carried out, the identity of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law should be established on the basis of the production or presentation of an authentic travel document which is valid for crossing the border.
Na mejnih prehodih, kjer se ne izvaja taka sistematična kontrola, bi bilo treba ugotoviti identiteto oseb, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja po pravu Unije, na podlagi izročitve ali predložitve verodostojne potne listine, veljavne za prestop meje.
For that purpose, those persons should be subject to a rapid and straightforward verification of the validity of the travel document for crossing the border, and of the presence of signs of falsification or counterfeiting, where appropriate by using technical devices, and, in cases where there are doubts about the travel document or where there are indications that such a person could represent a threat to the public policy, internal security, public health or international relations of the Member States, the border guard should consult all relevant databases in accordance with this Regulation.
V ta namen bi bilo treba pri navedenih osebah hitro in enostavno preveriti veljavnost potne listine za prestop meje ter prisotnost znakov ponarejanja, po potrebi z uporabo tehničnih naprav, v primerih dvoma glede potne listine ali kjer se nakazuje, da bi taka oseba lahko predstavljala grožnjo javnemu redu, notranji varnosti, javnemu zdravju ali mednarodnim odnosom držav članic, pa bi moral mejni policist preveriti vse ustrezne zbirke podatkov v skladu s to uredbo.
Where a Member State intends to carry out checks against relevant databases on a targeted basis regarding persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law, it should notify the other Member States, the Agency and the Commission without delay.
Kadar namerava država članica izvajati ciljno usmerjeno preverjanje podatkov v ustreznih zbirkah podatkov v zvezi z osebami, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja po pravu Unije, bi o tem morala nemudoma uradno obvestiti druge države članice, Agencijo in Komisijo.
A procedure for such notification should be developed by the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, in accordance with the Practical Handbook for Border Guards (Schengen Handbook).
Postopek za takšno uradno obvestilo bi morala določiti Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami v skladu s Praktičnim priročnikom za mejne policiste (Schengenski priročnik).