natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It should be ensured that the liquidity provider can provide the liquidity receiver with the necessary liquidity support in a timely manner, even in times of stress.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da lahko ponudnik likvidnosti prejemniku likvidnosti pravočasno zagotovi potrebno likvidnostno podporo, tudi v stresnih razmerah.
For these purposes, the liquidity provider should monitor the liquidity position of the liquidity receiver and any contingency funding plans of the liquidity provider and receiver should address the effects of applying a preferential outflow or inflow rate.
V ta namen bi moral ponudnik likvidnosti spremljati likvidnostno pozicijo prejemnika likvidnosti, ponudnik in prejemnik likvidnosti pa bi morala v svojih kriznih načrtih financiranja obravnavati učinke uporabe ugodnejše stopnje odlivov ali prilivov.
The conditions for compliance with the additional objective criteria set out in Article 29(2) and Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 should be aimed at providing sufficient ground to expect a higher than normal cross-border liquidity flows within a group or an IPS in stress while not hampering the efficiency and effectiveness of a model where the liquidity is normally centrally managed.
Cilj pogojev za skladnost z dodatnimi objektivnimi merili iz členov 29(2) in 34(2) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 bi moral biti zagotavljanje zadostne podlage, da je v stresnih razmerah znotraj skupine ali institucionalne sheme za zaščito vlog mogoče pričakovati višje čezmejne likvidnostne tokove od običajnih, pri čemer nista ovirani učinkovitost in uspešnost modela, v okviru katerega se likvidnost običajno centralno upravlja.
In certain specific cases of non-compliance with those conditions, namely where the liquidity provider or receiver does not meet or expects not to meet the liquidity coverage ratio or any liquidity related supervisory requirements or measures, or where the remaining maturity of the liquidity or credit line falls below the prescribed minimum or a notice of cancellation of the line is given, the relevant competent authorities should reassess whether the application of preferential liquidity outflow or inflow rates may be continued with the aim of avoiding the unintended consequences that an automatic suspension of the preferential treatment might cause in terms of procyclical and contagion effects.
Zadevni pristojni organi v specifičnih primerih neizpolnjevanja navedenih pogojev, namreč kadar ponudnik ali prejemnik likvidnosti ne dosega ali pričakuje, da ne bo dosegel količnika likvidnostnega kritja ali izpolnil nadzornih zahtev ali ukrepov, ki so povezani z likvidnostjo, ali kadar preostala zapadlost okvirnih likvidnostnih kreditov ali okvirnih kreditov ne dosega predpisanega minimuma ali kadar se za kredit izda obvestilo o preklicu, ocenijo, ali se lahko uporaba ugodnejše stopnje likvidnostnih odlivov ali prilivov nadaljuje, da bi se izognili nenačrtovanim posledicam, ki jih lahko ima samodejna prekinitev ugodnejše obravnave v smislu procikličnih učinkov in učinkov širitve okužbe.
The further specification of those additional objective criteria should not alter the responsibility of the credit institutions — as liquidity provider or liquidity receiver — to manage their liquidity risk on a prudent basis.
Podrobnejša opredelitev navedenih dodatnih objektivnih meril ne spremeni odgovornosti kreditnih institucij – v vlogi ponudnika ali prejemnika likvidnosti – da preudarno upravljajo svoje likvidnostno tveganje.
The further specification of those additional objective criteria should also be aimed at providing competent authorities with sufficient tools to determine the application of a preferential outflow or inflow rate.
Cilj podrobnejše opredelitve navedenih dodatnih meril bi moral biti tudi pristojnim organom zagotoviti dovolj orodij, da določijo uporabo ugodnejše stopnje odlivov ali prilivov.
The European Banking Authority has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], and requested the opinion of the Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010,
Evropski bančni organ je izvedel odprta javna posvetovanja o osnutku regulativnih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, analiziral potencialne povezane stroške in koristi v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] ter zaprosil za mnenje interesne skupine za bančništvo, ustanovljene v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 –
This Regulation further specifies the additional objective criteria laid down in Article 29(2) and Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 for the purposes of the application of the waiver set out therein.
Ta uredba podrobneje opredeljuje dodatna objektivna merila iz člena 29(2) in 34(2) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 za namene uporabe opustitve, določene v navedenih členih.
Low liquidity risk profile of the liquidity provider and receiver
Profil nizkega likvidnostnega tveganja ponudnika in prejemnika likvidnosti
The low liquidity risk profile referred to in point (a) of Article 29(2) and in point (a) of Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 shall satisfy the following conditions:
Profil nizkega likvidnostnega tveganja iz točke (a) člena 29(2) in točke (a) člena 34(2) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 izpolnjuje naslednja pogoja:
the liquidity provider and receiver have complied with the required level of the liquidity coverage ratio as set out in Articles 4 and 38 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61, as well as any liquidity-related supervisory requirements or measures applied pursuant to Title VII, Chapter 2, Sections III and IV of Directive 2013/36/EU, on an on-going basis and for at least 12 months prior to the authorisation to apply the preferential outflow or inflow rate for undrawn credit or liquidity facilities pursuant to Article 29(1) and Article 34(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61;
ponudnik in prejemnik likvidnosti dosegata zahtevano raven količnika likvidnostnega tveganja iz členov 4 in 38 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 ter izpolnjujeta vse nadzorne zahteve ali ukrepe, povezane z likvidnostjo, ki se uporabljajo v skladu z oddelkoma III in IV poglavja 2 naslova VII Direktive 2013/36/EU, in sicer neprekinjeno in vsaj 12 mesecev pred dovoljenjem za uporabo ugodnejše stopnje odlivov ali prilivov za čezmejne nečrpane okvirne kredite ali okvirne likvidnostne kredite v skladu s členoma 29(1) in 34(1) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61;
the liquidity provider and receiver's liquidity positions pose a low level of risk according to the latest supervisory review and evaluation process conducted in accordance with Title VII, Chapter 2, Section III of Directive 2013/36/EU.
likvidnostne pozicije ponudnika in prejemnika likvidnosti predstavljajo nizko tveganje glede na zadnji proces nadzorniškega pregledovanja in ovrednotenja, izveden v skladu z oddelkom III poglavja 2 naslova VII Direktive 2013/36/EU.
For the purposes of determining whether the condition referred to in point (a) of this paragraph is satisfied, the required level of the liquidity coverage ratio shall be calculated on the basis that the preferential liquidity outflow or inflow rate applied during the twelve month period referred to in that point.
Za namene določanja, ali je pogoj iz točke (a) tega odstavka izpolnjen, se zahtevana raven količnika likvidnostnega kritja izračuna ob predpostavki, da se je v dvanajstmesečnem obdobju iz navedene točke uporabljala ugodnejša stopnja likvidnostnih odlivov in prilivov.
Where the liquidity provider or receiver has been granted permission from the relevant competent authorities to waive the condition set out in point (d) of Article 29(1) and point (d) of Article 34(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 and a liquidity provider or receiver does not meet or expects not to meet the required level of the liquidity coverage ratio set out in Articles 4 and 38 of that Delegated Regulation, or any liquidity related supervisory requirements or measures applied under Title VII, Chapter 2, Sections III and IV of Directive 2013/36/EU, it shall immediately notify the relevant competent authorities and include a description of the effects of such failure to meet that liquidity coverage ratio or any liquidity related supervisory requirements or measures on the corresponding preferential outflow or inflow rate applied to its counterparty.
Kadar je ponudnik ali prejemnik likvidnosti pridobil dovoljenje zadevnih pristojnih organov za opustitev pogoja iz točke (d) člena 29(1) in točke (d) člena 34(1) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 ter ponudnik ali prejemnik likvidnosti ne dosega ali se pričakuje, da ne bo dosegel zahtevane ravni količnika likvidnostnega kritja iz členov 4 in 38 navedene delegirane uredbe ali izpolnil nadzorniških zahtev ali ukrepov, povezanih z likvidnostjo, ki se uporabljajo v skladu z oddelkoma III in IV poglavja 2 naslova VII Direktive 2013/36/EU, takoj obvesti zadevne pristojne organe in vključi opis učinkov, ki jih bo takšno nedoseganje ravni količnika likvidnostnega tveganja ali neizpolnjevanje nadzorniških zahtev ali ukrepov, povezanih z likvidnostjo, imelo na ustrezno ugodnejšo stopnjo odlivov ali prilivov, ki se uporablja za njegovo nasprotno stranko.
Where the liquidity provider or receiver has been granted permission from the relevant competent authorities to waive the condition set out in point (d) of Article 29(1) and point (d) of Article 34(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 and a liquidity provider or receiver does not meet or expects not to meet the required level of the liquidity coverage ratio set out in that Delegated Regulation, the notification referred to in paragraph 2 shall be included in the immediate notification and restoration plan required under Article 414 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Kadar je ponudnik ali prejemnik likvidnosti pridobil dovoljenje zadevnih pristojnih organov za opustitev pogoja iz točke (d) člena 29(1) in točke (d) člena 34(1) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 ter ponudnik ali prejemnik likvidnosti ne dosega ali se pričakuje, da ne bo dosegel zahtevane ravni količnika likvidnostnega kritja iz navedene delegirane uredbe, se obvestilo iz odstavka 2 vključi v takojšnje uradno obvestilo in načrt o ponovni vzpostaviti skladnosti, ki se zahteva na podlagi člen 414 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
In the cases referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3, the relevant competent authorities shall determine whether the preferential outflow or inflow rates continue to apply in accordance with the process referred to in point (b) of Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
V primerih iz odstavkov 2 in 3 zadevni pristojni organi v skladu s postopkom iz točke (b) člena 20(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 določijo, ali se ugodnejše stopnje odlivov in prilivov še naprej uporabljajo.
Legally binding agreements and commitments between the group entities regarding the undrawn credit or liquidity line
Pravno zavezujoči dogovori in zaveze med subjekti v skupini v zvezi z nečrpanimi okvirnimi krediti ali okvirnimi likvidnostnimi krediti
The legally binding agreements and commitments referred to in point (b) of Article 29(2) and in point (b) of Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 shall satisfy the following conditions:
Pravno zavezujoči dogovori in zaveze iz točke (b) člena 29(2) in točke (b) člena 34(2) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 izpolnjujejo naslednje pogoje:
the credit or liquidity line is a committed line which is legally and practically available at any time, for the duration of the facility, even during a period of stress, on a cross-border basis.
okvirni kredit ali okvirni likvidnostni kredit je zavezujoč kredit, ki je pravno in praktično na voljo ves čas v času trajanja okvirnega kredita, tudi v stresnem obdobju in na čezmejni osnovi.
It is specifically dedicated to the application of the preferential outflow or inflow rate provided for in Articles 29 and 34 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 and available on demand.
Namenjen je izrecno uporabi ugodnejše stopnje odlivov ali prilivov, določenih v členih 29 in 34 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61 in je na voljo na zahtevo.
For these purposes, credit institutions have conducted sufficient legal review supported by a written and reasoned legal opinion approved by their management bodies, confirming the legal validity and enforceability of the credit or liquidity line agreement or commitment in all relevant jurisdictions;
Kreditne institucije so v ta namen opravile dovolj natančen pravni pregled, podprt s pisnim in utemeljenim pravnim mnenjem, ki so ga odobrili njihovi upravljalni organi in ki potrjuje pravno veljavnost in izvršljivost dogovora ali zaveze o okvirnem kreditu ali okvirnem likvidnostnem kreditu v vseh zadevnih jurisdikcijah;
the currency denomination of the committed credit or liquidity line is consistent with the distribution by currency of the net liquidity outflows of the liquidity receiver that are unrelated to the line;
določitev valute zavezujočega okvirnega kredita ali okvirnega likvidnostnega kredita je skladna z razporeditvijo po valuti neto likvidnostnih odlivih prejemnika likvidnosti, ki niso povezani s kreditno linijo;
the amount and the cost of the committed credit or liquidity line are clearly specified in the relevant contract;
znesek in stroški odobrenega okvirnega kredita ali okvirnega likvidnostnega kredita so jasno navedeni v zadevni pogodbi;
the agreements and commitments do not contain any clause that would allow the liquidity provider to:
dogovori in zaveze ne vsebujejo klavzul, ki bi ponudniku likvidnosti dovoljevale:
require any conditions to be fulfilled before the liquidity is provided;
da zahteva izpolnitev kakršnih koli pogojev pred zagotovitvijo likvidnosti;
withdraw from its obligations to fulfil these agreements and commitments;
da odstopi od svojih obveznosti v zvezi z izpolnitvijo navedenih dogovorov in zavez;
change the terms of the agreements and commitments without prior approval from the relevant competent authorities;
da spremeni pogoje dogovorov in zavez brez predhodne odobritve zadevnih pristojnih organov;
the credit or liquidity line has a remaining maturity of over six months at all times.
okvirni kredit ali okvirni likvidnostni kredit ima vedno preostalo zapadlosti več kot šest mesecev.
If the credit or liquidity line does not have a maturity date, it has a minimum notice period for cancellation of six months.
Če okvirni kredit ali okvirni likvidnostni kredit nima datuma zapadlosti, ima minimalni šestmesečni odpovedni rok za preklic.
The legal review referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 shall be regularly updated to reflect any changes in the laws of all relevant jurisdictions.
Pravni pregled iz točke (a) odstavka 1 se redno posodablja, da odraža spremembe zakonodaje vseh zadevnih jurisdikcij.
Competent authorities shall be notified of the outcome of these legal reviews.
Pristojne organe se obvesti o rezultatih navedenih pravnih pregledov.
The amount of the credit or liquidity line referred to in point (c) of paragraph 1 shall not be revised without the prior consent of the relevant competent authorities.
Znesek okvirnega kredita ali okvirnega likvidnostnega kredita iz točke (c) odstavka 1 se ne spremeni brez predhodne odobritve zadevnih pristojnih organov.
If the remaining maturity referred to in point (e) of paragraph 1 falls below six months or a notice for cancellation of the credit or liquidity line is given, credit institutions shall immediately notify the relevant competent authorities.
Če preostala zapadlost iz točke (e) odstavka 1 pade pod šest mesecev ali če se predloži obvestilo o odpovedi okvirnega kredita ali okvirnega likvidnostnega kredita, kreditna institucija takoj obvesti zadevne pristojne organe.
Those authorities shall determine whether the preferential outflow or inflow rates continue to apply in accordance with the process referred to in point (b) of Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Navedeni organi v skladu s postopkom iz točke (b) člena 20(1) Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 575/2013 določijo, ali se ugodnejše stopnje odlivov ali prilivov še naprej uporabljajo.
Consideration of the liquidity risk profile of the liquidity receiver in the liquidity risk management of the liquidity provider
Upoštevanje profila likvidnostnega tveganja prejemnika likvidnosti pri upravljanju likvidnostnega tveganja ponudnika likvidnosti
The liquidity risk profile of the liquidity receiver is taken into account in the liquidity risk management of the liquidity provider as referred to in point (c) of Article 29(2) and in point (c) of Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 where the following conditions are satisfied:
Profil likvidnostnega tveganja prejemnika likvidnosti se upošteva pri upravljanju likvidnostnega tveganja ponudnika likvidnosti, kot je navedeno v točki (c) člena 29(2) in točki (c) člena 34(2) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/61, kadar so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
the liquidity provider monitors and oversees the liquidity position of the receiver on a daily basis.
ponudnik likvidnosti dnevno spremlja in nadzoruje likvidnostno pozicijo prejemnika.
In case of correspondent banking, the monitoring and the oversight of the liquidity position of the receiver may be limited to the balances of the vostro accounts of the liquidity receiver;
V primeru korespondenčnega bančništva se spremljanje in nadzor likvidnostne pozicije prejemnika lahko omeji na stanje vostro računov prejemnika likvidnosti;
the effects of the preferential outflow or inflow rate are fully considered and integrated into the contingency funding plans of the liquidity provider and the liquidity receiver, which take into account potential impediments to the transfer of such liquidity and assess the time needed to implement such a transfer.
ponudnik in prejemnik likvidnosti v svojih kriznih načrtih financiranja v celoti upoštevata in vanje vključita učinke ugodnejše stopnje odlivov ali prilivov ter tudi morebitne ovire za prenos takšne likvidnosti in ocenita čas, potreben za takšen prenos.
For these purposes, the liquidity provider demonstrates to the relevant competent authorities that it can reasonably be expected to continue to provide the liquidity facility to the liquidity receiver even in times of stress, without having a material adverse impact on its own liquidity position.
Ponudnik likvidnosti v te namene zadevnim pristojnim organom dokaže, da se lahko razumno pričakuje, da bo še naprej zagotavljal likvidnostni kredit prejemniku likvidnosti tudi v stresnih razmerah, ne da bi to bistveno negativno vplivalo na njegovo likvidnostno pozicijo.
The contingency funding plan of the liquidity provider ensures that it does not rely on the liquidity needed to honour the committed credit or liquidity line of the liquidity receiver;
Ponudnik likvidnosti v svojem kriznem načrtu financiranja zagotovi, da se ne zanaša na likvidnost, ki je potrebna za spoštovanje zavezujočega okvirnega kredita ali okvirnega likvidnostnega kredita prejemnika likvidnosti;
the contingency funding plan of the liquidity provider takes into account the preferential outflow or inflow rate in order to ensure its ability to provide the necessary liquidity when required.
ponudnik likvidnosti v svojem kriznem načrtu financiranja upošteva ugodnejšo stopnjo odlivov ali prilivov za zagotavljanje svoje zmožnosti, da zagotovi potrebno likvidnost, ko je to potrebno.
OJ L 321, 27.6.2013, p. 1.
UL L 321, 27.6.2013, str. 1.
Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firm, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338).
Direktiva 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o dostopu do dejavnosti kreditnih institucij in bonitetnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij, spremembi Direktive 2002/87/ES in razveljavitvi direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES (UL L 176, 27.6.2013, str. 338).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1231
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1231
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153 setting out a methodology for determining the correlation parameters necessary for reflecting the change in the regulatory test procedure for the purpose of clarifying procedural elements and amending Regulation (EU) No 1014/2010
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2017/1153 o opredelitvi metodologije za določitev korelacijskih parametrov, potrebnih za odraz spremembe v regulativnem preskusnem postopku zaradi razjasnitve postopkovnih elementov, in spremembi Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1014/2010
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community's integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles [1], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 8(9) and the first subparagraph of Article 13(7) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o določitvi standardov emisijskih vrednosti za nove osebne avtomobile kot del celostnega pristopa Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz lahkih tovornih vozil [1] ter zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 8(9) in prvega pododstavka člena 13(7) Uredbe,
To facilitate the transition to the new regulatory test procedure for measuring CO2 emissions and fuel consumption from light duty vehicles (the Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicles Test Procedure, the WLTP), the correlation procedure for passenger cars should be aligned with that for light commercial vehicles to the extent possible.
Primerno je, da se proizvajalcem v primeru vozil kategorije M1 z največjo tehnično dovoljeno maso obremenjenega vozila 3000 kg ali več zagotovi enaka možnost kot pri vozilih kategorije N1, in sicer bodisi da koeficiente cestne obremenitve NEDC izpeljejo iz preskusov WLTP bodisi da uporabijo tabelirane vrednosti iz tabele 3 iz Priloge 4a k Pravilniku št. 83 Ekonomske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo (UN/ECE) (Pravilnik UN/ECE št. 83) [4].
The designation of contact points at type approval authorities and technical services by Member States should be clarified so that the electronic signing keys needed for the formal correlation tool runs can be provided in an efficient and secure way.
To bi moralo olajšati preskuse za homologacijo te specifične skupine vozil.
In the case of M1 vehicles with a technically permissible maximum laden mass of 3000 kg or more, it is appropriate to provide manufacturers with the same possibility as for N1 vehicles to either derive NEDC road load coefficients from the WLTP tests or use the tabulated values set out in Table 3 of Annex 4a to Regulation No 83 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) (UN/ECE Regulation No 83) [4].
Zaradi nadaljnjega razvoja orodja za korelacijo nekateri vhodni podatkovni parametri niso več potrebni, medtem ko bi bilo treba dodati druge administrativne podatke, da se zagotovi sledljiv in preverljiv proces.
This should facilitate the type approval testing of this specific group of vehicles.
Primerno je tudi, da se uvede uporaba elektronskih zgoščevalnih kod za datoteke z rezultati korelacije.
Based on the further development of the correlation tool, certain input data parameters are no longer needed while other data of an administrative nature should be added to ensure a traceable and verifiable process.
Nekatere omejene in nezaupne rezultate orodja za korelacijo bi bilo treba dati na voljo Komisiji, da se zagotovijo stalen razvoj in izboljšave orodja za korelacijo ter sredstva za nadaljnje preverjanje rezultatov korelacije.