natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This alleged favourable treatment to the Union industry would also be illustrated by the Commission's leniency towards them when failing to provide certain important information (the parties referred to missing invoices).
Ta domnevna ugodnejša obravnava industrije Unije naj bi se kazala tudi s prizanesljivostjo Komisije do nje, ko ni zagotovila nekaterih pomembnih podatkov (strani so navedle manjkajoče račune).
As concerns the allegation of favourable treatment, the claim is rejected.
Glede očitka o ugodnejši obravnavi je trditev zavrnjena.
The issue at stake concerns the wording in recital 59 of the provisional Regulation.
Zadevno vprašanje se nanaša na besedilo uvodne izjave 59 začasne uredbe.
In that recital it is explained that for internal transfers, no invoices are issued which is in line with acceptable accounting practises.
V navedeni uvodni izjavi je pojasnjeno, da za interne transferje niso izdani računi, kar je v skladu s sprejemljivo računovodsko prakso.
There is no issue of the Union industry being allowed not to provide requested information.
Ne gre za to, da bi bilo industriji Unije dovoljeno, da ne predloži zahtevanih podatkov.
The same exporting producers claimed that by collecting and verifying additional data from the Union producers it had discriminated against the Russian exporting producers which had requested a second verification.
Isti proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da je z zbiranjem dodatnih podatkov in njihovim preverjanjem pri proizvajalcih Unije ravnala diskriminatorno zoper ruske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so zahtevali ponovno preverjanje.
First, it should be noted that the Commission, as an investigating authority, clearly has a right to request additional data when it is deemed necessary and appropriate for its analysis whether during the provisional stage or definitive stage of the investigation.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da je jasno, da ima Komisija kot preiskovalni organ pravico zahtevati dodatne podatke, kadar meni, da je to potrebno in primerno za izvedbo analize, bodisi med začasno bodisi med dokončno fazo preiskave.
In this case, as explained in recital 154, the Commission had good reasons to request these additional data and to verify it afterwards.
Komisija je imela v tem primeru, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 154, dobre razloge, da je zahtevala te dodatne podatke in jih pozneje preverila.
The verifications concerned solely the additional data provided which were not requested before and ensured that the data on which the Commission eventually based its findings were reliable.
Preverjanje se je nanašalo zgolj na dodatne predložene podatke, ki se prej niso zahtevali, s čimer je Komisija zagotovila, da so bili podatki, na katerih je nazadnje utemeljila svoje ugotovitve, zanesljivi.
Secondly, the Russian exporting producers' requests for a second verification actually related to the same data subject to the original verification whereas the second verification at the premises of certain Union producers was needed to verify the additional data referred to in recital 8 and to determine whether anti-dumping duties would be levied retroactively.
Drugič, zahteva ruskega proizvajalca izvoznika za drugo preverjanje se je dejansko nanašala na iste podatke, ki so bili preverjeni že prvič, medtem ko je bilo drugo preverjanje v prostorih nekaterih proizvajalcev Unije potrebno, da je Komisija preverila dodatne podatke iz uvodne izjave 8, in odločila, ali bo protidampinške dajatve uvedla retroaktivno.
Recitals 21 and 22 of the provisional Regulation set out the provisional definition of the product concerned.
Zadevni izdelek je začasno opredeljen v uvodnih izjavah 21 in 22 začasne uredbe.
No party made any submission as regards the definition therein.
V zvezi z omenjeno opredelitvijo ni dala pripomb nobena stran.
The product concerned is definitively defined as flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, or other alloy steel but excluding of stainless steel, of all widths, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated and not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced), currently falling within CN codes ex72091500, 72091690, 72091790, 72091891, ex72091899, ex72092500, 72092690, 72092790, 72092890, 72112330, ex72112380, ex72112900, 72255080, 72269200 and originating in the PRC and Russia.
Zadevni izdelek je dokončno opredeljen kot ploščato valjani izdelki iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla ali drugega legiranega jekla, razen nerjavnega jekla, vseh širin, hladno valjani (hladno deformirani), neplatirani, neprevlečeni ali neprekriti in brez nadaljnje obdelave (hladno deformirani), ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex72091500, 72091690, 72091790, 72091891, ex72091899, ex72092500, 72092690, 72092790, 72092890, 72112330, ex72112380, ex72112900, 72255080, 72269200, ter s poreklom iz LRK in Rusije.
The following product types are excluded from the definition of the product concerned:
Iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka so izključene naslednje vrste izdelkov:
flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, of all widths, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated, not further worked than cold-rolled, whether or not in coils, of all thickness, electrical,
ploščato valjani izdelki iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla vseh širin, hladno valjani (hladno deformirani), neplatirani, neprevlečeni in neprekriti, brez nadaljnje obdelave, v kolobarjih ali ne, vseh debelin, elektropločevine,
flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, of all widths, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated, in coils, of a thickness of less than 0,35 mm, annealed (known as ‘black plates’),
ploščato valjani izdelki iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla vseh širin, hladno valjani (hladno deformirani), neplatirani, neprevlečeni in neprekriti, v kolobarjih, debeline manj kot 0,35 mm, žarjeni (znani kot „črna pločevina“),
flat-rolled products of other alloy steel, of all widths, of silicon-electrical steel, and
ploščato valjani izdelki iz drugega legiranega jekla, vseh širin, iz silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine in
flat-rolled products of alloy steel, not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced), of high-speed steel.
ploščato valjani izdelki iz legiranega jekla, hladno valjani (hladno deformirani), brez nadaljnje obdelave, iz hitroreznega jekla.
In the absence of any comments regarding the product concerned and the like product, the conclusions reached in recitals 22 to 24 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 22 do 24 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
As explained in recital 34 of the provisional Regulation, none of the exporting producers concerned by this investigation claimed MET.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 34 začasne uredbe, nobeden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov, na katere se ta preiskava nanaša, ni zahteval TGO.
In the provisional Regulation, the Commission selected Canada as the analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
V začasni uredbi je bila v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe kot primerljiva država izbrana Kanada.
One interested party claimed that the difference between the injury and dumping margins raised doubts as to the accuracy of the Commission's calculations.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da razlika med škodo in stopnjo dampinga poraja dvome o točnosti izračunov Komisije.
The same interested party also claimed that, if factually correct, such a difference should invalidate the choice of Canada as the analogue country given the level of prices of the product concerned in this country.
Trdila je tudi, da bi bilo treba ob predpostavki, da so dejstva pravilna, zaradi take razlike razveljaviti izbiro Kanade kot primerljive države glede na stopnjo cen zadevnega izdelka v njej.
The Commission confirms its calculations.
Komisija potrjuje svoje izračune.
Furthermore, the Commission recalls that the choice of the analogue country is made among countries where the price for the like product is formed in circumstances which are as similar as possible to those of the country of export.
Nadalje želi Komisija spomniti, da je primerljiva država izbrana med državami, v katerih se cena podobnega izdelka oblikuje v kar se da podobnih okoliščinah, kot veljajo v državi izvoza.
The level of prices as such is not a criterion in this selection.
Pri tej izbiri višina cen sama po sebi ni merilo.
In view of the above, the claim that Canada is not an appropriate analogue country is rejected.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se trditev, da Kanada ni ustrezna primerljiva država, zavrne.
The Commission confirms the reasoning outlined in recitals 27 to 34 of the provisional Regulation and the choice of Canada as the analogue country within the meaning of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija potrjuje obrazložitev iz uvodnih izjav od 27 do 34 začasne uredbe in izbiro Kanade kot primerljive države v smislu člena 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of comments regarding the determination of the normal value, recitals 35 to 45 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede določitve normalne vrednosti, se uvodne izjave od 35 do 45 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In its comments on the provisional Regulation, one group of companies noted an inconsistency between the injury and dumping calculations, which it claimed was due to a clerical error made by the Commission.
Ena skupina družb je v pripombah k začasni uredbi opozorila na neskladnost med škodo in izračunom dampinga, kar je po njenih trditvah posledica administrativne napake Komisije.
However, the Commission established that the inconsistency was caused by a small clerical error made by this group of companies and which affected the export price.
Vendar je Komisija ugotovila, da je neskladnost posledica drobne administrativne napake omenjene skupine družb, ki je vplivala na izvozno ceno.
This clerical error was corrected by the Commission.
Omenjeno napako je Komisija popravila.
In the absence of any comments regarding the comparison between the normal value and the export price, recitals 49 and 50 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno, se uvodni izjavi 49 in 50 začasne uredbe potrdita.
Due to the change of export price mentioned in recital 25 above, the dumping margin of one group of companies was recalculated and led to its slight increase.
Zaradi spremembe izvozne cene iz uvodne izjave 25 zgoraj je bila ponovno izračunana stopnja dampinga ene skupine družb, zaradi česar se je nekoliko zvišala.
This increase also changes the dumping margin of all other Chinese companies since this margin is based on this group of companies.
Zaradi zvišanja se spremeni tudi stopnja dampinga vseh drugih kitajskih družb, saj temelji na tej skupini družb.
The definitive dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot delež cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, so:
Table 1
Preglednica 1
Definitive dumping margin (%)
Dokončna stopnja dampinga (%)
After provisional disclosure, one Russian exporting producer contested the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Po začasnem razkritju je en ruski proizvajalec izvoznik nasprotoval uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
It submitted new data in order to contest the findings described in recital 60 of the provisional Regulation, where the Commission demonstrated that the exporting producer reported a higher quantity sold than what the production made physically possible.
Predložil je nove podatke, s katerimi je nasprotoval ugotovitvam iz uvodne izjave 60 začasne uredbe, v kateri je Komisija pokazala, da je proizvajalec izvoznik sporočil večjo prodano količino, kot jo je fizično omogočala proizvodnja.
The Commission organised two hearings, offering the exporting producer concerned the opportunity to comment and explain its claims.
Komisija je sklicala dve zaslišanji in zadevnemu proizvajalcu izvozniku ponudila možnost predložiti pripombe in pojasniti svoje trditve.
During the hearings, the Commission highlighted that any submission/explanation made after the verification can only be accepted if the data on which it is based has already been submitted or can be linked to data submitted with the questionnaire reply or during the verification visit at the latest.
Med zaslišanji je Komisija poudarila, da je mogoče vloge/pojasnila, predložena po preveritvi, sprejeti le, če so bili podatki, na katerih temelji, že predloženi ali jih je mogoče povezati s podatki, predloženimi z izpolnjenim vprašalnikom ali najpozneje med preveritvenim obiskom.
The exporting producer was not able to support its arguments either with information already contained in its questionnaire reply, or with information in the exhibits collected on the spot.
Proizvajalec izvoznik ni mogel podpreti svojih argumentov ne s podatki, ki jih je predložil z izpolnjenim vprašalnikom, ne s podatki iz vzorcev, vzetih na kraju samem.
The findings at provisional stage that led the Commission to apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation and laid down in recitals 60 and 61 of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Zato se ugotovitve iz začasne faze, na podlagi katerih je Komisija uporabila člen 18 osnovne uredbe in ki so navedene v uvodnih izjavah 60 in 61 začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
Thus, in line with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, the Commission definitively established the dumping margin for the company in question on the basis of the facts available.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe stopnjo dampinga za zadevno družbo dokončno določila na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
After the final disclosure, one exporting producer pointed out that it has been subject to discriminatory treatment in the context of the present anti-dumping investigation which has affected its procedural rights, including rights of defence.
Po dokončnem razkritju je en proizvajalec izvoznik poudaril, da je bil v tej protidampinški preiskavi diskriminiran, kar je vplivalo na njegove procesne pravice, vključno s pravico do obrambe.
This exporting producer claimed that the Commission did not accept the second verification in the premises of its subsidiary in Belgium, whereas there was a second verification done at the premises of Union industry producers and importers.
Ta proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da Komisija ni sprejela drugega preverjanja v prostorih njegove hčerinske družbe v Belgiji, medtem ko je v prostorih proizvajalcev in uvoznikov industrije Unije opravila drugo preverjanje.
For the reasons explained in recital 15, this claim has to be rejected.
Iz razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodni izjavi 15, je treba to trditev zavrniti.
This exporting producer also stated that the Commission could have used the export prices of its related trader/importer and the cost of manufacturing data of the only exporting producer that fully cooperated with the Commission.
Ta proizvajalec izvoznik je navedel tudi, da bi Komisija lahko uporabila izvozne cene njegovega povezanega trgovca/uvoznika in podatke o stroških proizvodnje edinega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki je popolnoma sodeloval s Komisijo.
By this the Commission could allegedly have avoided the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation as it verified this related trader/importer separately and did not raise any issues as regards its cooperation.
S tem bi se lahko Komisija domnevno izognila uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe, saj je tega povezanega trgovca/uvoznika preverila ločeno in v zvezi z njegovim sodelovanjem ni imela pripomb.
As explained above, the fact that the overall sales volume (after deduction of the captive use and adjusted by the stock variation) reported by the exporting producer exceeded the quantities produced, did not allow the Commission to conclude that the export sales to the Union were fully reported.
Kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, Komisija zaradi dejstva, da je skupen obseg prodaje (po odbitku uporabe za lastne potrebe in prilagojeno na spreminjanje zalog), o katerem je poročal proizvajalec izvoznik, presegal proizvedene količine, ni mogla sklepati, da je bil izvoz v Unijo sporočen v celoti.
The Commission therefore rejected the proposal of the company to use a set of transactions that may only partially represent the total sales to the Union.
Zato je zavrnila predlog družbe, naj uporabi transakcije, ki morda predstavljajo le del skupne prodaje Unije.
Consequently the Commission did not use any cost of production data, as there were no available export sales to be used for the comparison.
Zato Komisija ni uporabila podatkov o stroških proizvodnje, saj ni bilo na voljo podatkov o izvozu, ki bi jih lahko uporabila za primerjavo.
Two exporting producers submitted comments concerning the conduct of the verification visits and requested the Commission to suspend the investigation pending the investigation of their claims.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika sta predložila pripombe glede izvajanja preveritvenih obiskov in od Komisije zahtevala opustitev preiskave, dokler njune trditve niso preverjene.
In that context the exporting producers contest the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation by the Commission.
V tem smislu proizvajalci izvozniki nasprotujejo uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
In addition, the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation requested suspension of the application of the definitive anti-dumping measures to be imposed until the formal complaint of the two exporting producers has been duly considered by the competent Union institutions.
Poleg tega je ministrstvo za gospodarski razvoj Ruske federacije zahtevalo opustitev uvedbe dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov, dokler pristojne institucije Unije ne obravnavajo uradne pritožbe obeh proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The Commission notes that the verification is one step of the investigation process carried out by the Commission as an investigating authority.
Komisija opozarja, da je preverjanje eden od korakov preiskave, ki ga Komisija opravi kot preiskovalni organ.
The Commission extensively explained the substantive reasons on the basis of which it decided to apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Obširno je pojasnila vsebinske razloge, na podlagi katerih se je odločila uporabiti člen 18 osnovne uredbe.
The application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation is based on the evidence submitted in writing by the companies to the Commission and on the reliability and consistency of such evidence.
Uporaba člena 18 osnovne uredbe temelji na dokazih, ki so jih Komisiji pisno predložile družbe, ter zanesljivosti in doslednosti teh dokazov.
The exporting producers were given opportunities to fully exercise their rights of defence throughout the proceeding via submission of information, comments, hearings and meetings, including two meetings specifically dedicated to the issues raised.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so imeli ves čas postopka priložnost v celoti uporabiti svojo pravico do obrambe z dajanjem informacij, pripomb, z zaslišanji in srečanji, vključno z dvema srečanjema, ki sta bila namenjena zlasti tem vprašanjem.
As far as the request for suspension is concerned, the Commission notes that the only basis for suspension of any measures imposed pursuant to the basic Regulation is Article 14(4).
Glede zahteve za opustitev pa Komisija opozarja, da je člen 14(4) osnovne uredbe edina podlaga za opustitev katerega koli uvedenega ukrepa.
The Commission notes further that the conditions for suspension as laid down in the said article are not met.
Nadalje opozarja, da pogoji za opustitev, kot so določeni v navedenem členu, niso izpolnjeni.
This article provides that measures may only be suspended in the Union interest where market conditions have temporarily changed to an extent that injury would be unlikely to resume as a result of the suspension.
Ta člen določa, da je mogoče ukrepe opustiti le v interesu Unije, če so se razmere na trgu začasno toliko spremenile, da je malo verjetno, da bi se škoda zaradi začasne opustitve nadaljevala.
There is no indication that such conditions would be met in the current case and the Commission notes that no such circumstances were pointed to.
Nič ne kaže na to, da bi bili ti pogoji v tem primeru izpolnjeni, in Komisija opozarja, da nihče ni opozoril na takšne okoliščine.
Rather, the investigation has shown that the conditions for the imposition of definitive measures, as laid out in Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, were met.
Prav nasprotno, preiskava je pokazala, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za uvedbo dokončnih ukrepov, kot so določeni v členu 9(4) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore the Commission rejects this request.
Zato je Komisija to zahtevo zavrnila.
After provisional disclosure, one exporting producer contested the adjustment which the Commission made to its costs of production of cold-rolled flat steel products as set out in recital 76 and justified in recital 80 of the provisional Regulation.
Po začasnem razkritju je en proizvajalec izvoznik nasprotoval prilagoditvi, ki jo je Komisija izvedla v zvezi z njegovimi stroški proizvodnje hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz jekla ter kot je navedena v uvodni izjavi 76 in utemeljena v uvodni izjavi 80 začasne uredbe.
However, the exporting producer concerned did not bring forward any arguments that would have allowed the Commission to change its view that the material consumption ratios reported by the company in its reply to the questionnaire were inadequate for the Commission to make an accurate assessment of the cost of the materials used for the production of cold-rolled flat steel products by the company.
Vendar zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik ni dal nobenih argumentov, na podlagi katerih bi lahko Komisija spremenila mnenje, da količniki potrošnje surovin, ki jih je družba sporočila v vprašalniku, niso zadoščali za to, da bi Komisija natančno ocenila stroške surovin, porabljenih za proizvodnjo hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz jekla te družbe.
The Commission therefore rejected this claim.
Komisija je zato to trditev zavrnila.
The same exporting producer also claimed that losses in relation to the liquidation of its two overseas subsidiaries should be excluded from the determination of the selling, general and administrative expenses (‘SG&A expenses’).
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da bi morale biti izgube, povezane z likvidacijo njegovih dveh čezmorskih odvisnih družb, izvzete iz določitve prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov („PSA-stroški“).
In addition, it claimed that packing expenses had been double-counted in the cost of production and in the SG&A expenses.
Poleg tega je trdil, da so bili stroški pakiranja upoštevani dvakrat, in sicer v stroških proizvodnje in PSA-stroških.
The Commission revised its findings accordingly since the explanations given by the company after provisional disclosure were supported by information that was duly submitted with its questionnaire reply or during or before the verification visit.
Komisija je ustrezno popravila svoje ugotovitve, saj so podatki, ki jih je družba pravilno predložila z izpolnjenim vprašalnikom oziroma pred preveritvenim obiskom ali med njim, podpirali pojasnila, ki jih je družba dala po začasnem razkritju.
After reconsidering the SG&A expenses, the Commission found some domestic sales to be profitable.
Po ponovni določitvi PSA-stroškov je Komisija ugotovila, da je bil del domače prodaje dobičkonosen.
This allowed the Commission to calculate the dumping margin on the basis of the company's own SG&A expenses and profit.
To je Komisiji omogočilo izračun stopnje dampinga na podlagi lastnih PSA-stroškov in dobička družbe.
At provisional stage, the Commission did not find any profitable domestic sales and therefore calculated the dumping margin using SG&A expenses and profit from external sources.
Komisija v začasni fazi ni ugotovila dobičkonosne domače prodaje, zato je stopnjo dampinga izračunala iz PSA-stroškov in dobička iz zunanjih virov.
Two exporting producers disagreed with how the Commission had calculated their SG&A expenses as described in recital 75 of the provisional Regulation.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika se nista strinjala s tem, kako je Komisija izračunala njune PSA-stroške, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 75 začasne uredbe.