natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The main evidence of the likelihood of continuation of dumping is, however, when Chinese export volumes to the EU are considered.
Vendar glavni dokaz verjetnosti nadaljevanja dampinga izhaja iz proučitve kitajskega obsega izvoza v EU.
Indeed, the evolution of export sales in the period 2012-RIP shows that the export of Chinese producers increased by 47 %.
Iz gibanja izvoza v obdobju 2012–OPP je namreč razvidno, da se je izvoz kitajskih proizvajalcev povečal za 47 %.
This holds true even when the analysis excludes the sales of the two exporters which were found not to be dumping in the original investigation and therefore they are not subject to the current anti-dumping measures.
To velja tudi, če se iz analize izključi prodaja dveh izvoznikov, za katera je bilo v prvotni preiskavi ugotovljeno, da nista izvajala dampinga, in za katera torej sedanji protidampinški ukrepi ne veljajo.
Indeed, export sales of the remaining companies in the same period followed a similar trend (+48 %).
Izvoz preostalih družb se je namreč v istem obdobju gibal podobno (+ 48 %).
When the Commission compared this rate of growth to the more limited rate of growth of the domestic demand in the same period (+20 %), and to the much faster rate of growth of installed capacity in China (+54 % according to the exporters' associations, and +69 % according to the complainant), it became clear that Chinese companies have to rely on aggressive pricing strategies in their export market in order to achieve an acceptable level of capacity utilisation.
Ko je Komisija to stopnjo rasti primerjala z bolj omejeno stopnjo rasti domačega povpraševanja v istem obdobju (+ 20 %) in mnogo hitrejšo stopnjo rasti nameščene zmogljivosti na Kitajskem (+ 54 % po podatkih združenj izvoznikov in + 69 % po podatkih pritožnika), je postalo jasno, da se morajo kitajske družbe zanašati na agresivne strategije oblikovanja cen na svojem izvoznem trgu, da bi dosegle sprejemljivo stopnjo izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti.
With respect to these export figures, one interested party claimed that the share of Chinese exports directed to the Union market is decreasing.
V zvezi s temi podatki o izvozu je ena zainteresirana stran trdila, da se delež kitajskega izvoza, namenjenega na trg Unije, zmanjšuje.
Indeed, the share of Chinese exports directed to the Union decreased in the period 2012-RIP from around 35 % to 30 %.
Delež kitajskega izvoza, namenjenega v Unijo, se je namreč v obdobju 2012–OPP zmanjšal s približno 35 % na 30 %.
With respect to this claim, it should firstly be mentioned that the EU keeps being the main export market for Chinese exporters.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba najprej navesti, da je EU še naprej glavni izvozni trg za kitajske izvoznike.
Moreover, this slight decrease is mainly a consequence of the good performance of Chinese exporters in other markets; a performance which seems to be caused also by aggressive pricing policies in those markets.
Poleg tega je to majhno zmanjšanje v glavnem posledica uspešnosti kitajskih izvoznikov na drugih trgih, za katero se zdi, da je bila dosežena tudi z agresivnimi politikami oblikovanja cen na navedenih trgih.
For example, in the same period 2012-RIP, Chinese exports to the Republic of Korea (a market in which, as seen above, Chinese prices are lower than the prices in the EU in the RIP by around 16 %) increased by around 72 %.
V istem obdobju 2012–OPP se je na primer kitajski izvoz v Republiko Korejo (trg, na katerem so kitajske cene za približno 16 % nižje od cen v EU v OPP, kot je navedeno zgoraj) povečal za približno 72 %.
On the other hand, on the Indonesian market, which was mentioned above as an example of fair pricing (+ 9,4 % over the Union average price), the Chinese export performance suffered, with volumes decreasing by around 16 %.
Po drugi strani se je uspešnost kitajskega izvoza na indonezijskem trgu, ki je bil zgoraj naveden kot primer poštenega oblikovanja cen (+ 9,4 % nad povprečno ceno Unije), poslabšala, saj se je obseg zmanjšal za približno 16 %.
Therefore, in light of this analysis, the conclusion that Chinese companies have to rely on aggressive pricing strategies in their export market is confirmed.
Na podlagi te analize je torej potrjen sklep, da se morajo kitajske družbe na svojem izvoznem trgu zanašati na agresivne strategije oblikovanja cen.
Furthermore, concerning the projections for the future, a sectorial independent study foresees that demand in China for manmade fibres (a wider product category, which includes the product concerned) will remain flat until at least 2018 [17].
Poleg tega je v zvezi z napovedmi za prihodnost v neodvisni panožni študiji predvideno, da bo povpraševanje po umetnih vlaknih (širša kategorija izdelka, ki vključuje tudi zadevni izdelek) na Kitajskem ostalo nespremenjeno najmanj do leta 2018 [17].
Another study also suggests that Chinese inventories are full, as a result from a fall in the raw material prices [18].
Tudi iz druge študije je razvidno, da so kitajske zaloge zaradi padca cen surovin polne [18].
This has made the downstream industry reduce their supply of high tenacity yarns to the minimum necessary, in order to avoid risks due to the fluctuations of prices.
Zaradi tega je industrija, ki je nižje v prodajni verigi, svojo dobavo preje visoke trdnosti zmanjšala na najmanjšo potrebno, da bi se izognila tveganjem zaradi nihanja cen.
Therefore, it is likely that if the measures were allowed to lapse the Chinese exporting producers would keep engaging in aggressive pricing practices, in order to conquer additional market share in Europe for their significant over-capacity.
Zato je verjetno, da bi ob prenehanju veljavnosti ukrepov kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki še naprej izvajali agresivne prakse oblikovanja cen, da bi za svojo veliko presežno zmogljivost osvojili dodaten tržni delež v Evropi.
Conclusion on dumping and likelihood of continuation of dumping
Sklep o dampingu in verjetnosti nadaljevanja dampinga
The investigation, relying on the best facts available, showed that Chinese producers have been dumping during the review investigation period.
Preiskava, ki je temeljila na najboljših razpoložljivih dejstvih, je pokazala, da so kitajski proizvajalci v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom izvajali damping.
It was established that China disposes of enormous spare capacity (when compared with the size of the Union market).
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da ima Kitajska ogromno prosto zmogljivost (v primerjavi z velikostjo trga Unije).
Moreover, given the slow growth of the Chinese domestic market, Chinese exporting producers need to keep entering the Union market with significant quantities of the product concerned in order to achieve an acceptable level of sales.
Poleg tega morajo kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki zaradi počasne rasti kitajskega domačega trga na trg Unije še naprej izvažati velike količine zadevnega izdelka, da bi dosegli sprejemljivo raven prodaje.
Under these circumstances, it is concluded that, should the measures be allowed to lapse, it is very likely that the dumping practices, which were not stopped by the measures, would continue in the EU market.
V teh okoliščinah se sklene, da je v primeru prenehanja veljavnosti ukrepov zelo verjetno, da se bodo dampinške prakse, ki jih ukrepi niso ustavili, na trgu EU nadaljevale.
During the review investigation period, the like product was manufactured by six Union producers who constitute the ‘Union industry’ within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Podobni izdelek je v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom proizvajalo šest proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljajo „industrijo Unije“ v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
None of them opposed the initiation of this review.
Nobeden od njih ni nasprotoval začetku tega pregleda.
The Commission established the Union consumption on the basis of the available import statistics, the actual sales of cooperating Union producers on the Union market and estimated sales of the non-cooperating Union producers.
Komisija je potrošnjo Unije določila na podlagi razpoložljivih statističnih podatkov o uvozu, dejanske prodaje sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije na trgu Unije in ocenjene prodaje nesodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije.
The definition of consumption relates to free market sales, inclusive of sales to related parties but exclusive of captive use.
Opredelitev potrošnje je povezana s prodajo na prostem trgu, v katero je vključena prodaja povezanim strankam in izključena lastna uporaba.
Captive use, that is, internal transfers of the like product within the integrated Union producers for further processing, have not been included in the Union consumption figure, because these internal transfers are not in competition with sales of independent suppliers in the free market.
Lastna uporaba, tj. notranji prenosi podobnega izdelka med integriranimi proizvajalci Unije za nadaljnjo predelavo, ni vključena v podatek o potrošnji Unije, ker ti notranji prenosi niso v konkurenci s prodajo od neodvisnih dobaviteljev na prostem trgu.
The sales to related companies were included in the Union consumption figure since, according to the data collected during the investigation, those related companies were free to purchase the product concerned also from other sources.
Prodaja povezanim družbam je bila vključena v podatek o potrošnji Unije, saj so po podatkih, zbranih med preiskavo, navedene povezane družbe lahko zadevni izdelek prosto kupovale od drugih virov.
In addition, the Union producers' average sales prices to related parties were found to be in line with the average sales prices to unrelated parties.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da povprečne prodajne cene proizvajalcev Unije povezanim strankam ustrezajo povprečnim prodajnim cenam nepovezanim strankam.
Source: Questionnaire replies and Article 14(6) database.
Vir: Izpolnjeni vprašalniki in podatkovna zbirka iz člena 14(6).
Union consumption increased by 11 % from 196478 tonnes in 2012 to 217171 tonnes in the review investigation period.
Potrošnja Unije se je povečala za 11 %, in sicer s 196478 ton v letu 2012 na 217171 ton v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Consumption during most of the period considered was higher than the consumption of 205912 tonnes in the investigation period of the original investigation (July 2008 to June 2009).
Potrošnja je bila večino obravnavanega obdobja večja od potrošnje v obdobju prvotne preiskave (od julija 2008 do junija 2009), ki je znašala 205912 ton.
One interested party claimed that the Commission services should have included captive sales into the determination of consumption and that by doing so the Chinese market share would have been stable.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da bi morale službe Komisije v določitev potrošnje vključiti prodajo za lastno uporabo in da bi bil v takem primeru kitajski tržni delež stabilen.
It suggests that the Commission services have wrongly distinguished between three markets, i.e. sales to unrelated companies, sales to related companies intended for free market sales and sales to related companies intended for captive use, whereas allegedly all these sales should have been included in the determination of Union consumption.
Navaja, da so službe Komisije napačno razlikovale med tremi trgi, tj. prodajo nepovezanim družbam, prodajo povezanim družbam, namenjeno prodaji na prostem trgu, in prodajo povezanim družbam, namenjeno uporabi za lastne potrebe, medtem ko bi morale biti vse te prodaje domnevno vključene v določitev potrošnje Unije.
First, it should be underlined that no distinction was made between three different markets.
Prvič, poudariti je treba, da službe Komisije niso razlikovale med tremi različnimi trgi.
Captive use by related companies were excluded because these products are not put into free circulation on the EU market and do therefore not compete with imports.
Uporaba za lastne potrebe povezanih družb je bila izključena, ker se ti izdelki ne dajo v prosti promet na trgu EU in torej ne konkurirajo uvozu.
These sales merely consist in transfer of products to related entities for their incorporation into the production process of other products, not under investigation.
Ta prodaja vključuje zgolj prenos izdelkov povezanim subjektom zaradi njihove vključitve v proizvodni proces drugih izdelkov, ki niso zajeti s preiskavo.
That captive use therefore cannot be considered as part of the Union consumption of the product concerned.
Navedene uporabe za lastne potrebe torej ni mogoče šteti za del potrošnje zadevnega izdelka v Uniji.
Secondly, in any event, the hypothetical addition of captive sales to Union consumption would not make the evolution of Chinese market share stable.
Drugič, če bi se prodaja za lastno uporabo prištela potrošnji Unije, razvoj kitajskega tržnega deleža nikakor ne bi bil stabilen.
On the contrary, the trend remains largely the same as shown below in Table 3.
Nasprotno, gibanje ostaja večinoma enako, kot je prikazano v preglednici 3 spodaj.
Imports subject to measures from the country concerned
Uvoz iz zadevne države, za katerega veljajo ukrepi
It is recalled that in the original investigation, import volumes found not to be dumped were excluded from the analysis of the development of the imports from the PRC on the Union market and the impact on the Union industry.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bil v prvotni preiskavi obseg uvoza, za katerega je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni bil dampinški, izključen iz analize gibanja uvoza iz LRK na trg Unije in vpliva na industrijo Unije.
The volume and market share of dumped imports from China were established on the basis of the Article 14(6) database and developed as follows:
Obseg in tržni delež dampinškega uvoza iz Kitajske sta bila določena na podlagi podatkovne zbirke iz člena 14(6) ter sta se gibala na naslednji način:
Volume and market share of imports subject to measures
Obseg in tržni delež uvoza, za katerega veljajo ukrepi
Source: Article 14(6) database.
Vir: Podatkovna zbirka iz člena 14(6).
Market share in relation to consumption plus captive use (%)
Tržni delež v zvezi s potrošnjo skupaj z uporabo za lastne potrebe (%)
While Chinese dumped imports accounted for 18,8 % market share and 38404 tonnes in the original investigation period, they have increased considerably over the period considered in this review.
Medtem ko je imel kitajski dampinški uvoz v obdobju prvotne preiskave 18,8-odstotni tržni delež in je znašal 38404 tone, se je v obravnavanem obdobju v tem pregledu znatno povečal.
In fact, dumped imports from China increased from 44484 to 57465 tonnes over the period considered and accounted for a 26,5 % market share during the review investigation period.
Dampinški uvoz iz Kitajske se je namreč v obravnavanem obdobju povečal s 44484 na 57465 ton in je imel v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom 26,5-odstotni tržni delež.
Prices of imports subject to measures from the country concerned and price undercutting
Cene uvoza iz zadevne države, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, in nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen
Import prices were established on the basis of Article 14(6) database and on average decreased 12 % during the period considered.
Cene uvoza so bile določene na podlagi podatkovne zbirke iz člena 14(6) in so se v obravnavanem obdobju znižale za povprečno 12 %.
Prices of imports subject to measures
Cene uvoza, za katerega veljajo ukrepi
Source: Article 14(6) database
Vir: Podatkovna zbirka iz člena 14(6).
Because of non-cooperation from Chinese producers, and therefore the lack of product-type-related export price data, the Commission could not make a detailed price comparison by product type.
Zaradi nesodelovanja kitajskih proizvajalcev in s tem pomanjkanja podatkov o izvozni ceni, povezani z vrsto izdelka, Komisija ni mogla podrobno primerjati cen po vrstah izdelka.
For these reasons, the undercutting calculations were performed based on a comparison between the average prices of the Chinese exports subject to measures and the average Union Industry's prices during the review investigation period.
Zato so bili izračuni nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen opravljeni na podlagi primerjave med povprečnimi cenami kitajskega izvoza, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, in povprečnimi cenami industrije Unije v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
After adjusting for the conventional custom duty rate of 4 %, an undercutting margin of 22,7 % was established.
Po prilagoditvi za konvencionalno carinsko stopnjo v višini 4 % je bila določena 22,7-odstotna stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen.
The original investigation found a similar undercutting margin of 24,1 %.
V prvotni preiskavi je bila ugotovljena podobna stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen, in sicer 24,1-odstotna.
However, this margin was based on a comparable product type comparison, since Chinese exporters cooperated in that case.
Vendar je ta stopnja temeljila na primerjavi primerljivih vrst izdelka, saj so v navedeni zadevi kitajski izvozniki sodelovali.
The Commission therefore concluded that there is a consistent behaviour on the part of the PRC exporters in undercutting the EU producers' prices.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da izvozniki iz LRK dosledno nelojalno znižujejo cene proizvajalcev EU.
One interested party claimed that the non-dumped imports should have been included in the undercutting calculation.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da bi moral biti nedampinški uvoz vključen v izračun nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen.
The Commission however considers that such inclusion is not warranted, based on the application of the interpretation of the ADA provided by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body in the Beef and rice case [19], as already mentioned above in recital 35.
Vendar Komisija meni, da v skladu z razlago Protidampinškega sporazuma, ki jo je zagotovil Organ za reševanje sporov pri STO v zadevi o govedini in rižu [19], taka vključitev ni upravičena, kot je bilo navedeno že v uvodni izjavi 35 zgoraj.
In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined the impact of the dumped imports on the Union industry based on the evaluation of all relevant economic indicators for an assessment of the state of the Union industry from 2012 to the end of the RIP.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe učinek dampinškega uvoza na industrijo Unije proučila na podlagi ocene vseh ustreznih gospodarskih kazalnikov za oceno položaja industrije Unije od leta 2012 do konca OPP.
When doing so, the Commission distinguished between macroeconomic and microeconomic injury indicators.
Pri tem je razlikovala med makroekonomskimi in mikroekonomskimi kazalniki škode.
The macroeconomic indicators for the period considered were established, analysed and examined on the basis of the data provided for the Union industry.
Makroekonomski kazalniki za obravnavano obdobje so bili opredeljeni, analizirani in proučeni na podlagi podatkov, predloženih za industrijo Unije.
The microeconomic indicators were established on the basis of the data collected and verified at the level of the cooperating Union producers.
Mikroekonomski kazalniki so bili opredeljeni na podlagi podatkov, ki so bili zbrani in preverjeni na ravni sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije.
Due to problems of reconciliation regarding the data of one subsidiary of the DuraFiber group after its reorganisation (DuraFiber Technologies (DFT) GmbH, Germany), its submitted data and questionnaire reply were excluded from the determination of the microeconomic indicators.
Zaradi težav z uskladitvijo v zvezi s podatki hčerinske družbe skupine DuraFiber po njeni reorganizaciji (DuraFiber Technologies (DFT) GmbH, Nemčija) so bili njeni predloženi podatki in izpolnjeni vprašalnik izključeni iz določitve mikroekonomskih kazalnikov.
One interested party claimed that the exclusion of DuraFiber Germany possibly had altered the injury indicators in a fundamental way.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da so se zaradi izključitve družbe DuraFiber' Nemčija, kazalniki škode morebiti temeljito spremenili.
First it should be noted that the exclusion of the partially verified data from DuraFiber Germany only affected the establishment of the microeconomic indicators.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da je izključitev delno preverjenih podatkov družbe DuraFiber, Nemčija, vplivala samo na določitev mikroekonomskih kazalnikov.
The analysis of the macro indicators is therefore not affected.
Na analizo makrokazalnikov torej ni vplivala.
Furthermore, these micro indicators were based on the data of the remaining four Union producers representing around 80 % of the Union production.
Poleg tega so ti mikrokazalniki temeljili na podatkih preostalih štirih proizvajalcev Unije, ki so obsegali približno 80 % proizvodnje Unije.
Therefore, the specific indicators remain representative for the Union industry.
Določeni kazalniki torej ostajajo reprezentativni za industrijo Unije.
Finally, the partially verified data provided by DuraFiber Germany generally followed the trend of the microeconomic indicators of the four Union producers whose data were taken into account.
Nazadnje, delno preverjeni podatki, ki jih je zagotovila družba DuraFiber, Nemčija, so na splošno sledili gibanju mikroekonomskih kazalnikov štirih proizvajalcev Unije, katerih podatki so bili upoštevani.
In light of both considerations above, it is concluded that the exclusion of DuraFiber Germany from the analysis of the micro indicators did not change the injury indicators trends and the corresponding conclusions are therefore representative of the overall industry.
Glede na oba zgornja preudarka se sklene, da se zaradi izključitve družbe DuraFiber, Nemčija, iz analize mikrokazalnikov gibanja kazalnikov škode niso spremenila, zato so ustrezni sklepi reprezentativni za celotno industrijo.
In the following sections, the macroeconomic indicators are: production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, stocks, sales volume, market share and growth, employment, productivity, magnitude of the actual dumping margin, recovery from past dumping.
V naslednjih oddelkih so makroekonomski kazalniki: proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost, izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, zaloge, obseg prodaje, tržni delež in rast, zaposlenost, produktivnost, višina dejanske stopnje dampinga in okrevanje od preteklega dampinga.
The microeconomic indicators are: average unit prices, cost of production, profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investment, ability to raise capital and labour costs.
Mikroekonomski kazalniki so: povprečne cene na enoto, stroški proizvodnje, dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe, donosnost naložb, zmožnost zbiranja kapitala in stroški dela.
Production volume (Index)
Obseg proizvodnje (Indeks)
Production capacity (Index)
Proizvodna zmogljivost (Indeks)
During the period considered the production, production capacity and capacity utilisation remained stable.
Proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti so v obravnavanem obdobju ostale stabilne.
The Union industry's sales volume and market share in the Union developed over the period considered as follows:
Obseg prodaje in tržni delež industrije Unije sta se v Uniji v obravnavanem obdobju gibala na naslednji način:
Source: Article 14(6) database and questionnaire replies.
Vir: Podatkovna zbirka iz člena 14(6) in izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
Sales volume in the Union (tonnes)
Obseg prodaje v Uniji (v tonah)
Sales volume in the Union (Index)
Obseg prodaje v Uniji (Indeks)
The Union industry's sales volume in the Union market decreased by -3 % and their respective market share declined by 4,1 percentage points, from 34,4 % to 30,3 % over the period considered.
Obseg prodaje industrije Unije na trgu Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 3 %, njen tržni delež pa za 4,1 odstotne točke, tj. s 34,4 % na 30,3 %.
While Union consumption increased by 11 % over the period considered, the sales volume of the Union industry decreased by – 3 %.
Medtem ko se je potrošnja Unije v obravnavanem obdobju povečala za 11 %, se je obseg prodaje industrije Unije zmanjšal za 3 %.
Number of employees (Index)
Število zaposlenih (Indeks)
Productivity (unit/employee)
Produktivnost (enota/zaposlenega)
Productivity (unit/employee) (Index)
Produktivnost (enota/zaposlenega) (Indeks)
Employment decreased by – 3 % during the period considered.
Zaposlenost se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za 3 %.