natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission published the application for the approval of amendments to the specification, as required by Article 97(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Komisija v skladu s členom 97(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 vlogo za spremembo objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Komisija v skladu s členom 98 Uredbe (ES) št. 1308/2013 ni prejela nobenega ugovora.
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Méntrida’ (PDO) are hereby approved.
Sprememba specifikacije, objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v zvezi z imenom „Méntrida“ (ZOP), se odobri.
Regulation (EEC) No 2247/73 of the Commission of 16 August 1973 on the control of quality wines produced in specified regions (OJ L 230, 18.8.1973, p. 12) and the list of quality wines produced in specified regions published by the Commission pursuant to Article 3(2) thereof, as amended in the Official Journal of the European Communities (OJ C 146, 13.6.1986, p. 11).
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 2247/73 z dne 16. avgusta 1973 o nadzoru kakovostnih vin, proizvedenih v določenih regijah (UL L 230 z dne 18.8.1973, str. 12); in seznam kakovostnih vin, proizvedenih v določenih regijah, ki ga je objavila Komisija v skladu s členom 3 (2) in kakor je bila spremenjena v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti (UL C 146 z dne 13.6.1986, str. 11).
OJ C 194, 17.6.2017, p. 41.
UL C 194, 17.6.2017, str. 41.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1928
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1928
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Kintoa (PDO))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Kintoa (ZOP))
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs [1], and in particular Article 15(1) and Article 52(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. novembra 2012 o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in živil [1] ter zlasti členov 15(1) in 52(2) Uredbe, ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kintoa’ should therefore be entered in the register.
) s sedežem na njihovem ozemlju zakonito in neprekinjeno tržilo proizvod s prodajnim imenom „Kintoa“ več kot pet let in da je bilo to obravnavano v okviru nacionalnega postopka ugovora.
By letter received on 22 August 2016, the French authorities notified the Commission that the limited-liability agricultural holding EARL du Carré (Alain Cazanave, Le chalet, 380 Chemin du Carré, 64300 Sallespisse
Ker podjetje iz uvodne izjave 3 izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 15(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, bi mu bilo treba zaradi zagotovitve prehodnega obdobja za zakonito uporabo prodajnega imena po njegovi registraciji odobriti prehodno obdobje, ki bi trajalo do 31. decembra 2017, kar bi podjetju omogočilo, da še naprej uporablja ime „Kintoa“.
), which is established on their territory, had been legally marketing the product sold under the name ‘Kintoa’, using this name continuously for more than 5 years, and that this point had been raised during the national opposition procedure.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za politiko kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov –
Since the company mentioned in recital 3 above meets the requirements laid down in Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 for the granting of a transitional period in which to make legal use of the sales name after registration, it should be granted a transitional period ending on 31 December 2017, during which time it may make use of the name ‘Kintoa’.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Ime „Kintoa“ (ZOP) se registrira.
Article 1
Ime iz prvega odstavka opredeljuje proizvod skupine 1.1 Sveže meso (in klavnični izdelki) iz Priloge XI k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 [3].Člen 2
The name ‘Kintoa’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
Kmetijskemu gospodarstvu z omejeno odgovornostjo du Carré (Alain Cazanave, Le chalet, 380 Chemin du Carré, 64300 Sallespisse
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. — Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 [3].Article 2
) se dovoli, da še naprej uporablja registrirano ime „Kintoa“ (ZOP) do 31. decembra 2017.
The limited-liability agricultural holding EARL du Carré (Alain Cazanave, Le chalet, 380 Chemin du Carré, 64300 Sallespisse
Člen 3
) is hereby authorised to continue to use the registered name ‘Kintoa’ (PDO) until 31 December 2017.
Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 20. oktobra 2017
Done at Brussels, 20 October 2017.
Predsednik
The President
UL C 90, 23.3.2017, str. 9.
OJ C 90, 23.3.2017, p. 9.
V skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je bil zahtevek za registracijo imena „Kintoa“, ki ga je vložila Francija, objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1931
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1931
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Bleu d'Auvergne (PDO))
o odobritvi spremembe specifikacije za ime, vpisano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb, ki ni manjša (Bleu d'Auvergne (ZOP))
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Bleu d'Auvergne’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 [2], as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1259/2008 [3].
Komisija je v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 53(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 proučila zahtevek Francije za odobritev spremembe specifikacije za zaščiteno označbo porekla „Bleu d'Auvergne“, registrirano v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1107/96 [2], kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1259/2008 [3].
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Bleu d'Auvergne’ (PDO) are hereby approved.
Sprememba specifikacije, objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v zvezi z imenom „Bleu d'Auvergne“ (ZOP), se odobri.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1259/2008 of 16 December 2008 approving minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Bleu d'Auvergne (PDO)) (OJ L 338, 17.12.2008, p. 5).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1259/2008 z dne 16. decembra 2008 o odobritvi manjših sprememb specifikacije za ime, registrirano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Bleu d'Auvergne (ZOP)) (UL L 338, 17.12.2008, str. 5).
OJ C 194, 17.6.2017, p. 52.
UL C 194, 17.6.2017, str. 52.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1932
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1932
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(3) Uredbe,
By Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 [2] (‘the original Regulation’), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’ or ‘the country concerned’).
Svet je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 412/2013 [2] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“).
The investigation that led to the aforesaid Regulation used as investigation period the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011 (‘the original investigation’).
Preiskava, ki je privedla do navedene uredbe, je potekala v obdobju od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2011 („prvotna preiskava“).
Following a request lodged by the Kyocera Fineceramics Group (‘the applicant’ or ‘Kyocera’), the Commission announced by a notice (‘the notice of initiation’) published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3] the initiation of a partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Po zahtevi, ki jo je vložila družba Kyocera Fineceramics Group („vložnik“ ali „Kyocera“), je Komisija z obvestilom („obvestilo o začetku“), objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], objavila začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The group includes Dongguan Shilong Kyocera Co.
Skupina vključuje družbo Dongguan Shilong Kyocera Co.
Ltd, an exporting producer in the PRC.
Ltd., proizvajalca izvoznika iz LRK.
The review was limited to the examination of the product scope as regards the clarification of whether certain product types (i.e. ceramic slicers, ceramic graters, ceramic scissors, ceramic scrapers, ceramic sharpeners and ceramic coffee mills or, together, ‘the product types in question’) fall within the scope of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the country concerned.
Pregled je bil omejen na preučitev obsega izdelka, kar zadeva pojasnilo, ali nekatere vrste izdelka (tj. keramični rezalniki, keramični ribežni, keramične škarje, keramična strgala, keramični brusilci in keramični kavni mlinčki – skupaj: „zadevne vrste izdelkov“) spadajo na področje uporabe protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode s poreklom iz zadevne države.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
The Commission sent a questionnaire to the applicant.
Komisija je vložniku poslala vprašalnik.
In addition, the parties that cooperated in the original investigation were asked to comment on any differences between the product under review, as defined in recital 8, and the product types in question with respect to their basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics, their production process, end-uses and other aspects (if any).
Poleg tega so bile strani, ki so sodelovale v prvotni preiskavi, zaprošene za pripombe o kakršnih koli razlikah med izdelkom, ki se pregleduje, kot je opredeljen v uvodni izjavi (8), in zadevnimi vrstami izdelkov v zvezi z njihovimi osnovnimi fizikalnimi, tehničnimi in kemijskimi lastnostmi, proizvodnim postopkom, končno uporabo in drugimi vidiki (če obstajajo).
Kyocera submitted a questionnaire response and comments on the substance of the review.
Družba Kyocera je predložila odgovore na vprašalnik in pripombe na vsebino pregleda.
One Italian distributor said that the product types in question represent a very small part of its assortment.
En italijanski distributer je navedel, da zadevne vrste izdelka predstavljajo zelo majhen del njegovega nabora izdelkov.
Eighteen companies (two importers in Italy and 16 companies in the PRC) replied that they did not deal with the product types in question.
Osemnajst družb (dve v Italiji in 16 družb v LRK) je odgovorilo, da niso poslovale z zadevnimi vrstami izdelkov.
The complainant in the original investigation came forward but made no representations.
Pritožnik iz prvotne preiskave se je javil, vendar ni predložil stališč.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the purpose of the assessment as to whether there is a need for clarification/amendment of the scope of the existing anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za oceno o tem, ali je treba pojasniti/spremeniti obseg obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov.
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the present conclusions were reached.
Vse zainteresirane strani so bile seznanjene z bistvenimi dejstvi in premisleki, na podlagi katerih so bili sprejeti ti sklepi.
In accordance with Article 20(5) of the basic Regulation, parties were granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to the disclosure.
V skladu s členom 20(5) osnovne uredbe je bilo določeno obdobje, v katerem bi lahko strani predložile svoja stališča po razkritju.
Apart from the applicant (that welcomed the text), no parties submitted any oral or written comments.
Razen vložnika (ki je izrazil zadovoljstvo nad besedilom) ni nobena stran predložila ustnih ali pisnih pripomb.
The product under review is the product concerned as defined in the original Regulation, i.e. ceramic tableware and kitchenware, excluding ceramic knives, ceramic condiment or spice mills and their ceramic grinding parts, ceramic peelers, ceramic knife sharpeners and cordierite ceramic pizza-stones of a kind used for baking pizza or bread (‘the product under review’), currently falling within CN codes ex69111000, ex69120021, ex69120023, ex69120025 and ex69120029 (TARIC codes 6911100090, 6912002111, 6912002191, 6912002310, 6912002510 and 6912002910) and originating in the PRC.
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je zadevni izdelek, kakor je opredeljen v prvotni uredbi, in sicer keramična namizna in kuhinjska posoda, razen keramičnih nožev, keramičnih mlinčkov za začimbe ali zelišča in njihovih keramičnih drobilnih delov, keramičnih lupilcev, keramičnih brusilcev nožev ter kamnov za peko pice, ki so izdelani iz kordieritne keramike in se uporabljajo za peko pice ali kruha („izdelek, ki se pregleduje“), trenutno uvrščena pod oznake KN ex69111000, ex69120021, ex69120023, ex69120025 in ex69120029 (oznake TARIC 6911100090, 6912002111, 6912002191, 6912002310, 6912002510 in 6912002910), ter s poreklom iz LRK.
Results of the investigation
Rezultati preiskave
Introduction and methodology
Uvod in metodologija
In light of the relevant statistics derived from Article 14(6) of the basic Regulation, each year some 350000 tonnes of Chinese ceramic tableware and kitchenware enter the Union market.
Ob upoštevanju ustreznih statističnih podatkov, pridobljenih iz člena 14(6) osnovne uredbe, vsako leto na trg Unije vstopi približno 350000 ton kitajske keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode.
According to Kyocera, the product types in question have different production process, end uses, design and physical characteristics than the product under review.
Po navedbah družbe Kyocera so za zadevne vrste izdelkov značilni drugačni proizvodni postopki, končne uporabe, zasnove in fizikalne lastnosti kot za izdelek, ki se pregleduje.
Consequently, Kyocera claimed that, as it was confirmed for ceramic knives and other product types in the original investigation, the product types in question should also be excluded from the anti-dumping measures.
Zato je družba Kyocera zatrjevala, da bi bilo treba, kot je bilo v prvotni preiskavi potrjeno za keramične nože in druge vrste izdelkov, tudi zadevne vrste izdelkov izvzeti iz protidampinških ukrepov.
In light of their production processes and/or catalogues, in the original investigation the sampled cooperating producers in the Union and the PRC, and the analogue country producer in Brazil did not produce the product types in question.
Kakor je videti iz njihovih proizvodnih postopkov in/ali katalogov v prvotni preiskavi, vzorčeni sodelujoči proizvajalci v Uniji in LRK ter proizvajalec v primerljivi državi Braziliji niso proizvajali zadevnih vrst izdelkov.
This finding was additionally supported by the statement of 16 companies (co-operating exporting producers of the product concerned in the PRC in the original investigation) and two importers in Italy referred to in recital 5.
To ugotovitev je dodatno potrdila izjava 16 družb (sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zadevnega izdelka v LRK v prvotni preiskavi) in dveh uvoznikov v Italiji iz uvodne izjave (5).
Therefore, all data and information used and presented in the original Regulation did not include any data related to the product types in question.
Zato podatki in informacije, ki so bili uporabljeni in predstavljeni v prvotni uredbi, niso vsebovali podatkov, ki se nanašajo na zadevne vrste izdelkov.
The Commission examined whether the product types in question were distinct from other types of ceramic tableware and kitchenware currently subject to measures based on (i) their physical, technical and chemical characteristics, (ii) their production process and (iii) their typical end-uses and interchangeability.
Komisija je preučila, ali so se zadevne vrste izdelkov razlikovale od drugih vrst keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode, za katere trenutno veljajo ukrepi na podlagi (i) njihovih fizikalnih, tehničnih in kemičnih lastnosti, (ii) njihovega proizvodnega postopka in (iii) njihove tipične končne uporabe in zamenljivosti.
Basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics
Osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemične lastnosti
Ceramic tableware and kitchenware as defined in the original Regulation is made of ‘traditional ceramics’, i.e. porcelain or china, of common pottery, stoneware, earthenware or fine pottery or other materials which confer it a strength of 1000 kg/m2~1200 kg/m2.
Keramična namizna in kuhinjska posoda, kakor je opredeljena v prvotni uredbi, je izdelana iz „tradicionalne keramike“, tj. iz porcelana, navadne lončenine, kamenine, fine lončenine ali drugih materialov, ki ji dajejo trdnost 1000 kg/m2 ~ 1200 kg/m2.
The product types in question include a working part (to cut, grind or sharpen) and a non-working part (to handle them).
Zadevne vrste izdelkov obsegajo delovni del (za rezanje, mletje ali brušenje) ter preostali del izdelka (za rokovanje za izdelkom).
The working part is made of advanced ceramics.
Delovni del je narejen iz tehnične keramike.
Advanced ceramic items are developed with advanced technology so that they suit as industrial materials.
Izdelki iz tehnične keramike se razvijajo z napredno tehnologijo, tako da ustrezajo kot industrijski materiali.
They are heat resistant, have an anti-wear performance and insulating material.
Odporni so na vročino in obrabo ter vsebujejo izolacijski material.
Their strength is 10000 kg/m2~12000 kg/m2.
Njihova trdnost je 10000 kg/m2 ~ 12000 kg/m2.
The main raw materials of traditional ceramics include minerals such as kaolin, feldspar and quartz.
Glavne surovine za tradicionalno keramiko vključujejo minerale, kot so kaolin, glinenec in kremen.
Either zirconium oxide or aluminium oxide is the key raw material of advanced ceramics.
Ključna surovina za tehnično keramiko je cirkonijev oksid ali aluminijev oksid.
Due to its specific design and physical characteristics, ceramic tableware and kitchenware as defined in the original Regulation covers mainly items aimed at retaining foodstuff.
Zaradi posebne zasnove in fizikalnih lastnosti keramična namizna in kuhinjska posoda, kakor je opredeljena v prvotni uredbi, zajema predvsem izdelke za shranjevanje živil.
Due to their specific design and physical characteristics (shape and hardness) the product types in question are aimed at cutting (pieces of) foodstuff in different ways, including for example grinding or, as is the case of ceramic sharpeners, at sharpening certain tools.
Zaradi svoje posebne oblike in fizikalnih lastnosti (oblika in trdnost) so zadevne vrste izdelkov namenjene za rezanje (kosov) živil na različne načine, vključno na primer z mletjem, ali, v primeru keramičnih brusilcev, za brušenje nekaterih orodij.
The review investigation established that a production line used to produce traditional ceramics is not suitable to produce advanced ceramics.
V preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom je bilo ugotovljeno, da proizvodna linija za proizvodnjo tradicionalne keramike ni primerna za proizvodnjo tehnične keramike.
Typically the production process of traditional ceramics requires adding water to the raw material to make clay or barbotine, then shaping and later firing in a conventional kiln at a temperature of 1000 °C-1250 °C.
Običajno proizvodni postopek tradicionalne keramike zahteva dodajanje vode surovinam, da se pridobita glina ali barbotin, nato pa oblikovanje ter žganje v tradicionalni peči pri temperaturi 1000 °C–1250 °C.
By distinction, the working parts of the product types in question are produced by putting pure ceramic powder into a mould which is placed under high pressure to solidify the powder in the desired shape.
Delovni deli zadevnih vrst izdelkov pa se proizvajajo z dajanjem čistega keramičnega praha v kalup, v katerem se nato pod visokim pritiskom prah strdi v želeno obliko.
The material is fired and sintered in a kiln under precisely controlled temperatures (the firing temperature being 1400 °C).
Material je žgan in sintran v peči z natančno uravnavano temperaturo (temperatura žganja je 1400 °C).
Typical end-uses and interchangeability
Tipična končna uporaba in zamenljivost
As highlighted in recital 17, the product types in question are not aimed at retaining foodstuff, which is the typical end-use of the product concerned as defined in the original Regulation.
Kot je bilo poudarjeno v uvodni izjavi (17), zadevne vrste izdelkov niso namenjene shranjevanju živil, kar je tipična končna uporaba zadevnega izdelka, kakor je opredeljen v prvotni uredbi.
The review investigation has shown that there is no interchangeability between any of the categories of the product under review and the product types in question.
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je pokazala, da nobena vrsta izdelka, ki se pregleduje, ni zamenljiva z zadevnimi vrstami izdelkov.
The review investigation has established that, due to their different physical, technical and chemical characteristics, different end-uses and different production process, the product types in question do not fall within the product scope of the antidumping measures in force.
V preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom je bilo ugotovljeno, da zadevne vrste izdelka zaradi različnih fizikalnih, tehničnih in kemijskih lastnosti, različnih končnih uporab in različnih proizvodnih postopkov ne spadajo v obseg izdelka veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
It is therefore considered appropriate to clarify that the product types in question do not fall within the product scope subject to antidumping measures.
Zato se zdi primerno pojasniti, da keramični rezalniki, keramični ribežni, keramične škarje, keramična strgala, keramični brusilci in keramični kavni mlinčki ne spadajo v obseg obsega izdelka, ki je predmet protidampinških ukrepov.
Given the above, it is considered appropriate to amend the original Regulation to clarify the product definition.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se zdi primerno spremeniti prvotno uredbo, da se pojasni opredelitev izdelka.
Interested parties were informed of the conclusions of the review investigation.
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o ugotovitvah preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Retroactive application
Retroaktivna uporaba
The notice of initiation invited interested parties to make their views known on the possible retroactive application of any Regulation resulting from this review.
V obvestilu o začetku so bile zainteresirane strani pozvane, da izrazijo svoje mnenje o morebitni retroaktivni uporabi uredbe, ki bi bila morda sprejeta na podlagi tega pregleda.