natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this context it was argued that the application of Article 236 of the Community Customs Code falls within the exclusive competence of the national customs authorities under which the latter are obliged to reimburse duties paid that were not legally owed.
To še toliko bolj velja, ker navedena prejšnja praksa ne ustreza dejanskemu in pravnemu položaju obravnavane zadeve, razlike pa je mogoče pripisati dejanskim in pravnim razlikam v primerjavi z obravnavano zadevo.
The parties concerned further argued that Article 236 of the Community Customs Code cannot be made subject to or subsidiary to Article 14 of the basic Regulation because both are secondary legislation and therefore none supersedes the other.
Navedene razlike so naslednje: Nezakonitost, ki jo je ugotovilo Sodišče, se ne nanaša na ugotovitve o dampingu, škodi ter interesu Unije in s tem na načelo naložitve dajatve, temveč le na določeno stopnjo dajatve.
In addition, the scope of Article 14 of the basic Regulation concerns special provisions that cover investigations and procedures under the basic Regulation and is not applicable to any other legal instrument such as the Community Customs Code.
Prejšnje razglasitve ničnosti, na katere so se sklicevale zainteresirane strani, pa so se nasprotno nanašale na ugotovitve o dampingu, škodi in interesu Unije.
The Commission observes that the Community Customs Code does not apply automatically to the imposition of anti-dumping duties, but only by virtue of a reference in the regulation imposing anti-dumping duties.
Po mnenju institucij je bilo zato primerneje, da se v prihodnosti sprejmejo novi ukrepi.
Pursuant to Article 14 of the basic Regulation, the Commission may decide not to apply certain provisions of that Code, and instead create special rules.
Zlasti v obravnavanem primeru ni bilo potrebno pridobiti dodatnih informacij od zainteresiranih strani.
Because the Community Customs Code only applies on the basis of a reference in the Council and Commission Implementing Regulations, it does not have, vis-à-vis Article 14 of the basic Regulation, the same rank in the hierarchy of norms, but is subordinated and may be rendered inapplicable or applicable in a different manner.
Komisija je morala namesto tega oceniti informacije, ki so bile vložene pri njej, vendar niso bile ocenjene pred sprejetjem Uredbe (ES) št. 1472/2006.
Adequate statement of reasons
V vsakem primeru nekdanje prakse v drugih primerih ne predstavljajo natančnega in brezpogojnega zagotovila za obravnavani primer.
The above mentioned interested parties argued that in violation of Article 296 TFEU, the Commission failed to provide adequate statement of reasons and indication of the legal basis on which duties were reimposed retroactively and therefore the reimbursement of duties denied to the importers concerned by the current implementation.
Vse strani, na katere se nanaša postopek, tj. zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki in strani v zadevah, ki so še v obravnavi pred sodiščem, ter združenje, ki zastopa eno od teh strani, so bile z razkritjem obveščene o pomembnih dejstvih, na podlagi katerih namerava Komisija sprejeti sedanjo oceno TGO.
The lack of adequate reasoning concerned in particular (i) the lack of legal basis for the reopening of the investigation and the lack of publishing a relevant notice announcing such reopening; (ii) the only partial implementation of the judgment of the General Court by merely assessing MET/IT claims of those exporting producers where reimbursement claims had been filed by the importers; (iii) the derogation from the principle of non-retroactivity of anti-dumping duties; (iv) the application of the basic Regulation prior to its amendment on 6 September 2012 for the assessment of the exporting producers' IT claims on the one hand and the current basic Regulation as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 with regard to the applicable decision making procedures and (v) the lack of response to the legal arguments provided by these parties following the disclosure of the Commission concerning the assessment of the MET claims of the Chinese exporting producers concerned of 15 December 2015.
S tem so njihove pravice do obrambe zaščitene.
Concerning the lack of any legal basis to reopen the investigation the Commission recalls the case-law quoted above at recital 15, pursuant to which it may resume the investigation at the very point at which the illegality occurred.
V zvezi s tem je treba zlasti poudariti, da nepovezani uvozniki v okviru protidampinškega postopka niso deležni pravice do obrambe, saj ti postopki niso usmerjeni proti njim.
That was after initiation.
Pri delnem izvrševanju sodb se poraja vprašanje, ali in v kolikšnem obsegu morata instituciji izvrševati sodbo, kar je odvisno od konkretne vsebine sodbe.
There is no legal obligation for the Commission to publish a notice to reinitiate, to resume or to reopen the proceeding or the investigation.
Ali je mogoče potrditi uvedbo dajatev na uvoz, do katerega je prišlo pred sodbo, je zlasti odvisno od tega, ali je zaradi nezakonitosti, ugotovljene v sodbi, prizadeta ugotovitev škodljivega dampinga ali le izračun natančne stopnje dajatev.
Rather, such is the automatic effect of the judgment which the Institutions then have to implement.
V slednjem primeru, za kar gre tudi pri obravnavani zadevi, ni razloga za povračilo vseh dajatev.
According to the case-law, the legality of an anti-dumping regulation has to be assessed in the light of the objective norms of Union law, and not of a decisional practice, even where such a practice exists (which is not the case here).
Nasprotno, zadostuje, da se določi ustrezna stopnja dajatve in povrne morebitna razlika (saj stopnje dajatve ne bi bilo mogoče povečati, ker bi to pomenilo retroaktivno uvedbo).
Hence, the fact that the Commission may have followed in the past in certain cases a different practice cannot create legitimate expectations.
Prejšnje razglasitve ničnosti, na katere so se sklicevale zainteresirane strani, so se nanašale na ugotovitve o dampingu, škodi in interesu Unije (in sicer v zvezi z ugotavljanjem dejstev, presojo dejstev ali pravico do obrambe).
That is all the more the case because the previous practice referred to does not correspond to the factual and legal situation of the present case, and differences can be explained by factual and legal differences with the present case.
Navedene razglasitve ničnosti so bile delne ali popolne.
Those differences are as follows: The illegality identified by the Court does not concern the findings on dumping, injury, and Union interest, and therefore the principle of the imposition of the duty, but only the precise duty rate.
Sodišča Unije uporabijo tehniko razglasitve delne ničnosti, kadar lahko na podlagi dejstev iz spisa sama sklenejo, da bi morali instituciji odobriti določeno prilagoditev ali uporabiti drugačno metodo za izračun, s katero bi prišli do uvedbe nižje dajatve (vendar ne izpodbijajo ugotovitve o dampingu, škodi in interesu Unije).
The previous annulments relied on by the interested parties, on the contrary, concerned the findings on dumping, injury and Union interest.
(Nižja) dajatev ostaja v veljavi za čas pred razglasitvijo ničnosti in čas po razglasitvi ničnosti.
The institutions therefore considered it more appropriate to adopt new measures for the future.
Da bi instituciji ravnali skladno s sodbo, ponovno izračunata stopnjo dajatve in ustrezno spremenita uredbo o uvedbi dajatve za nazaj in za naprej.
In particular, in the present case, there was no need whatsoever to seek additional information from interested parties.
Poleg tega nacionalnim carinskim organom naročita, naj povrnejo razliko pri tistih zahtevkih, ki so bili vloženi v ustreznem roku.
Rather, the Commission had to assess information that had been filed with it, but not assessed before the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006.
Sodišča Unije razglasijo popolno ničnost, kadar na podlagi dejstev iz spisa sama ne morejo ugotoviti, ali sta instituciji upravičeno izhajali iz tega, da je prišlo do dampinga, škode in interesa Unije, saj sta instituciji morali ponovno opraviti del svoje preiskave.
In any event, previous practice in other cases does not constitute precise and unconditional assurance for the present case.
Ker sodišča Unije niso pristojna za izvedbo preiskave namesto Komisije, so uredbe o uvedbi dokončnih dajatev razglasila za nične v celoti.
Finally, all parties against which the proceeding is directed, i.e. the exporting producers concerned, as well as the parties in the pending Court cases and the association representing one of those parties, have been informed by the disclosure of the relevant facts on the basis of which the Commission intends to adopt the present MET assessment.
Zato sta instituciji ustrezno dokazali prisotnost treh pogojev, potrebnih za uvedbo ukrepov, šele po sodbi o razglasitvi ničnosti dajatev.
Hence, their rights of defence are safeguarded.
Za uvoz, ki se je zgodil pred ustrezno ugotovitvijo dampinga, škode in interesa Unije, je uvedba dokončnih dajatev prepovedana tako z osnovno uredbo kot PDS.
In that regard, it is to be noted in particular that unrelated importers do not enjoy, in an antidumping proceeding, rights of defence, as those proceedings are not directed against them.
Zato akti, ki sta jih instituciji sprejeli za zaključitev navedenih preiskav, uvajajo dokončne dajatve le za prihodnost.
Regarding the partial implementation of the judgments is concerned whether and to what extent the Institutions have to implement a judgment depends on the concrete content of the judgment.
Pričujoči primer se razlikuje od preteklih (delnih ali popolnih) razglasitev ničnosti v tej meri, da ne zadeva samega obstoja dampinga, škode in interesa Unije, temveč le izbiro ustrezne stopnje dajatve (tj. izbiro med stopnjo dajatve, ki se uporablja za edino vzorčeno družbo, ki je prejela TGO, in stopnjo preostale dajatve).
In particular, whether or not it is possible to confirm the imposition of duties on imports that took place prior to the judgment depends on whether the finding of injurious dumping as such, or only the calculation of the precise duty rate are affected by the illegality identified in the judgment.
Sporno torej ni samo načelo uvedbe dajatve, temveč le natančen znesek (z drugimi besedami: vrsta) dajatve.
In the latter situation, which is pertinent here, there is no justification for reimbursing all duties.
Morebitna prilagoditev pa je možna le navzdol.
Rather, it suffices to determine the correct duty rate, and to reimburse any possible difference (whereas it would not be possible to increase the duty rate, as the increased part would constitute retroactive imposition).
V nasprotju s preteklimi primeri razglasitve delne ničnosti, obravnavanimi v uvodni izjavi (119), sodišče ni moglo odločiti, ali je treba določiti novo (znižano) stopnjo dajatve, saj je za tako odločitev najprej potrebna ocena zahtevka za TGO.
Past annulments to which interested parties refer have concerned the finding of dumping, injury and Union interest (either with regard to the establishment of facts, with regard to the assessment of the facts, or with regard to rights of defence).
Ocenjevanje zahtevka za TGO spada v pristojnosti Komisije.
Those annulments have either been partial or complete.
Zato Sodišče tega dela preiskave ne more opraviti namesto Komisije, saj bi s tem prekoračilo svoje pristojnosti.
The Union Courts use the technique of partial annulment where they can conclude themselves on the basis of the facts in the file that the Institutions ought to have granted a certain adjustment or should have used a different method for a certain calculation, which would have resulted in the imposition of a lower duty (but did not put into question the findings of dumping, injury and Union interest).
V nasprotju s preteklimi primeri razglasitve popolne ničnosti ugotovitve glede dampinga, škode, vzročnosti in interesa Unije niso bile razglašene za nične.
The (lower) duty remains in force both for the time prior to annulment and for the time after annulment.
Zato je bil obstoj dampinga, škode, vzročne zveze in interesa Unije ustrezno ugotovljen ob sprejetju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1472/2006.
In order to comply with the judgment, the Institutions recalculate the duty and amend the Regulation imposing the duty accordingly for the past and for the future.
Zato ni nobenega razloga, da se ponovna uvedba dokončnih protidampinških dajatev omeji na prihodnost.
They also instruct national customs authorities to reimburse the difference, where such claims had been made in due time.
Obravnavana uredba se torej v nobenem primeru ne oddalji od prakse odločanja institucij, tudi če bi bila ta pomembna.
The Union Courts proceed to complete annulment where they cannot establish themselves on the basis of the facts in the file whether or not the institutions were right in assuming that there was dumping, injury and Union interest, because the Institutions had to redo part of their investigation.
Zainteresirane strani so trdile, da razglasitev ničnosti protidampinških dajatev ne bi zajemala neupravičene obogatitve uvoznikov, kot trdi Komisija, saj so ti uvozniki morebiti utrpeli upad prodaje zaradi dajatve, ki je bila vključena v prodajno ceno.
As the Union Courts are not competent for carrying out the investigation at the place of the Commission, they annulled the regulations imposing definitive duties completely.
V sodni praksi Sodišča je priznano, da se povračilo dajatev, ki so bile neupravičeno zaračunane, lahko zavrne, če bi prejemniki na tak način pridobili neupravičeno korist.
As a consequence, the Institutions validly established the presence of the three conditions necessary for the imposition of measures only after the judgment annulling the duties.
Komisija ugotavlja, da navedene zainteresirane strani ne izpodbijajo dejstva, da je bila dajatev prenesena, in da niso zagotovile nobenih dokazov za upad prodaje, v vsakem primeru pa sodna praksa na področju neupravičeno pridobljene koristi obravnava samo prenos, ne pa tudi morebitnih sekundarnih učinkov prenosa.
For imports that took place prior to the valid establishment of dumping, injury and Union interest, the imposition of definitive duties is prohibited both by the basic Regulation and by ADA.
V zvezi z domnevnim odstopanjem od načela prepovedi retroaktivnosti se sklicuje na uvodne izjave (76) do (81), kjer je bilo to obsežno obravnavano.
Therefore, the acts adopted by the institutions to close those investigations imposed definitive duties only for the future.
V zvezi z domnevno uporabo dveh različnih pravnih okvirjev pri trenutnem izvajanju se sklicuje na uvodne izjave (99) do (102), kjer je bilo to obsežno obravnavano.
The present case is different from past (partial or complete) annulments in so far, as it does not concern the very presence of dumping, injury and Union interest, but merely the choice of the appropriate duty rate (that is the choice between the duty rate applicable to the only company in the sample having received MET and the residual duty rate).
Glede pripomb, ki so jih predložile strani po razkritju ocene TGO zadevnih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, se šteje, da so bile v celoti obravnavane v veljavni uredbi.
What is at dispute is therefore not the very principle of imposing a duty, but only the precise amount (in other words: a modality) of the duty.
Druga postopkovna vprašanja
And the adjustment, if any, can only be downwards.
Zgoraj navedene zainteresirane strani so trdile, da bi morale biti zadevnim proizvajalcem izvoznikom glede trenutnega izvajanja zagotovljene enake procesne pravice, kot so bile zagotovljene vzorčnim proizvajalcem izvoznikom med prvotno preiskavo.
Contrary to the cases of partial annulment in the past discussed above in recital (119), the Court has not been able to decide as to whether a new (reduced) duty rate had to be granted, because that decision requires first an assessment of the MET claim.
Trdile so, da zlasti kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom niso bile zagotovljene nobene možnosti, da bi dopolnili obrazce za zahtevke za TGO/IO preko pozivov k dopolnitvam in da je bila opravljena le teoretična analiza, ne pa tudi preveritveni obisk na kraju samem.
That task of assessing the MET claim falls within the prerogatives of the Commission.
Poleg tega Komisija ni zagotovila ustreznega roka dostave razkritja ocene zahtevkov za TGO/IO zadevnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, saj so bili ti poslani le pravnim zastopnikov teh družb v času prvotne preiskave.
Hence, the Court cannot carry out this part of the investigation at the place of the Commission without overstepping its competences.
V nadaljevanju so trdile, da proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki jih to izvajanje zadeva, niso bila zagotovljena enaka postopkovna jamstva kot tista, ki se uporabljajo v standardnih protidampinških preiskavah, ampak so bili uporabljeni strožji standardi.
Contrary to cases of complete annulment in the past, the findings on dumping, injury, causality and Union interest have not been annulled.
Komisija ni upoštevala časovnega zamika med vložitvijo zahtevkov za TGO/IO v prvotni preiskavi in oceno teh zahtevkov.
Therefore, dumping, injury, causality and Union interest have been validly established at the time of adoption of Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006.
Poleg tega je bilo proizvajalcem izvoznikom med prvotno preiskavo zagotovljenih le 15 dni, da vložijo zahtevke za TGO/IO, namesto običajnih 21 dni.
Therefore, there is no reason to limit the reimposition of definitive anti-dumping duties to the future.
Poleg tega je eden izmed uvoznikov trdil, da so bile kršene procesne pravice proizvajalcev izvoznikov, saj ne morejo več zagotoviti smiselnih pripomb ali posredovati dodatnih informacij, ki bi podprle zahtevke, oddane pred 11 leti, saj podjetja morda ne obstajajo več ali dokumentacija morda ni več na voljo.
The present regulation does therefore in any event not depart from the decisional practice of the Institutions, even if it was relevant.
Ista stran je trdila, da bi, za razliko od prvotne preiskave, trenutna ponovna uvedba ukrepov vplivala le na uvoznike v Uniji, vendar brez kakršne koli možnosti, da bi ponudili pomemben prispevek.
Interested parties also argued that the annulment of anti-dumping duties would not entail any unjust enrichment by the importers, as claimed by the Commission, since these importers may have suffered a decline in sales due to the duty which had been incorporated in the sales price.
Prav tako so trdili, da je Komisija uporabila de facto razpoložljiva dejstva v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe, vendar pa Komisija ni delovala skladno s procesnimi pravili, navedenimi v členu 18(4) osnovne uredbe.
In the case-law of the Court of Justice, it is recognized that the repayment of charges which have been unduly levied may be refused where doing so would entail unjust enrichment of the recipients.
Komisija ugotavlja, da nobena določba osnovne uredbe od Komisije ne zahteva, da izvoznim družbam, ki zahtevajo TGO/IO, omogoči dopolnitev manjkajočih stvarnih informacij.
The Commission observes that those interested parties do not contest that the duty has been passed on and do not provide any proof for a decline in sales, and that in any event the case-law on unjust enrichment only takes into pass-on, but not possible secondary effects of pass-on.
Opozarja, da mora biti na podlagi sodne prakse dokazno breme na proizvajalcu, ki želi, da se mu na podlagi člena 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe odobri TGO/IO.
Regarding the alleged derogation from the principle of non-retroactivity, reference is made to the recitals 76 to 81 where this was addressed extensively.
V skladu z mnenjem Sodišča v sodbah v zadevah Brosmann in Aokang institucijama zato ni treba dokazati, da proizvajalec ne izpolnjuje pogojev, ki se zahtevajo za odobritev navedene obravnave.
Regarding the alleged application of two different legal frames in the current implementation reference is made to recitals 99 to 102 where this was addressed extensively.
Nasprotno, Komisija mora presoditi, ali podatki, ki jih je predložil zadevni proizvajalec, zadostujejo za dokaz, da so merila iz prvega pododstavka člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe izpolnjena, tako da se mu lahko odobri TGO/IO (glej uvodno izjavo (31)).
Finally, concerning the comments provided by these parties following the disclosure of the MET assessment of the Chinese exporting producers concerned, it is considered that these have been addressed fully in the current Regulation.
Pravica do zaslišanja se nanaša na presojo dejstev, vendar ne vključuje pravice do dopolnitve pomanjkljivih informacij.
Other procedural issues
V nasprotnem primeru bi proizvajalec izvoznik oceno lahko neomejeno podaljševal z zagotavljanjem informacij po kosih.
The above interested parties claimed that the same procedural rights should have granted to the exporting producers concerned by the current implementation than those granted to the sampled exporting producers during the original investigation.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da Komisiji od proizvajalca izvoznika ni treba zahtevati, naj dopolni zahtevek za TGO/IO.
They argued that in particular, the Chinese exporting producers were not provided any opportunity to complement their MET/IT claim forms via deficiency letters and only desk analysis had been carried out rather than on-spot verification visits.
Kot omenjeno v predhodni uvodni izjavi, lahko Komisija svojo oceno utemelji na podlagi informacij, ki jih je proizvajalec izvoznik že predložil.
In addition, the Commission did not ensure the due delivery of the disclosure of the assessment of MET/IT requests to the exporting producers concerned as these were only sent to the legal representatives of these companies at the time of the original investigation.
V vsakem primeru zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki niso izpodbijali ocene njihovih zahtevkov za TGO/IO, ki jih je sprejela Komisija, prav tako pa niso navedli, na katere dokumente ali osebe se ne morejo več sklicevati.
It was further argued that the exporting producers concerned by this implementation were not provided with the same procedural guarantees than those applied in standard anti-dumping investigations, but stricter standards were applied.
Ta trditev je zato tako abstraktna, da instituciji teh težav pri ocenjevanju zahtevkov za TGO/IO ne moreta upoštevati.
The Commission has not taken into account the time lag between the filing of the MET/IT request in the original investigation and the assessment of these claims.
Ker ta trditev temelji na domnevah in ni podprta z natančnimi navedbami o tem, kateri dokumenti in osebe niso več na voljo ter kakšen pomen imajo ti dokumenti in ljudje za oceno zahtevka za TGO/IO, jo je treba ovreči.
In addition, exporting producers, during the original investigation were only provided 15 days in order to fill in the MET/IT requests, instead of the usual 21 days.
Kar zadeva de facto uporabo člena 18(1) osnovne uredbe, to ne pomeni samodejne zahteve po uporabi člena 18(4) osnovne uredbe.
In addition, one of the importers claimed that the procedural rights of the exporting producers were violated as they were no longer in a position to provide meaningful comments or provide additional information to support claims that were made 11 years ago as the companies may no longer exist or the documents may no longer be available.
To je potrebno samo v primerih, če bi Komisija zavrnila informacije, ki jih je predložila zainteresirana stran.
The same party argued that unlike in the original investigation, the current reimposition of the measures would only affect the importers in the Union without, however, any option for them to provide meaningful input.
V trenutnem primeru je Komisija sprejela informacije, predložene s strani zadevnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in na njih utemeljila svoje ocene.
Also, it was claimed that the Commission applied de facto facts available within the meaning of Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, while the Commission did not comply with the procedural rules set out in Article 18(4) of the basic Regulation.
To ni uporaba razpoložljivih dejstev.
The Commission observes that nothing in the basic Regulation requires the Commission to give exporting companies claiming MET/IT the possibility to complete lacking factual information.
Nasprotno, Komisija ni zavrnila nobenih informacij.