natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 [2], the European Parliament and the Council adopted common rules for protection against dumped imports from countries that are not Member States of the Union.
Z Uredbo (EU) 2016/1036 [2] sta Evropski parlament in Svet sprejela skupna pravila za zaščito proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso države članice Unije.
Article 2(7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 constitutes the basis on which normal value should be determined in the case of imports from non-market economy countries.
Normalna vrednost bi se morala v primeru uvoza iz držav brez tržnega gospodarstva določiti na podlagi člena 2(7) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036.
In the case of countries which are, at the date of initiation of an investigation, not Members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/755 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], normal value should be determined in accordance with a specific methodology designed for those countries.
Glede na izkušnje iz preteklih postopkov je primerno, da se pojasnijo okoliščine, v katerih se lahko šteje, da obstaja znatno izkrivljanje, ki v veliki meri vpliva na sile prostega trga.
This Regulation is without prejudice to establishing whether or not any WTO Member is a market economy or to the terms and conditions set out in protocols and other instruments in accordance with which countries have acceded to the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization done on 15 April 1994 [4].
Zlasti je primerno pojasniti, da to velja, kadar sporočene cene ali stroški, vključno s stroški surovin in energije, niso rezultat sil prostega trga, in sicer zaradi znatnega poseganja države.
In light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to clarify the circumstances in which significant distortions affecting to a considerable extent free market forces may be deemed to exist.
Primerno je pojasniti tudi, da bi bilo treba pri ugotavljanju obstoja znatnega izkrivljanja med drugim upoštevati možni učinek enega ali več naslednjih elementov: ali zadevni trg v veliki meri oskrbujejo podjetja, ki delujejo v okviru lastništva, pod nadzorom ali pod nadzorom politik ali po navodilih organov države izvoznice; ali prisotnost države v podjetjih državi omogoča, da vpliva na cene ali stroške; ali javne politike ali ukrepi diskriminirajo v korist domačih dobaviteljev ali kako drugače vplivajo na sile prostega trga; ali je prisotno pomanjkanje zakonodaje o stečaju, družbah ali lastnini, ali diskriminatorna uporaba ali nezadostno izvrševanje navedene zakonodaje; ali so stroški plač izkrivljeni; ali dostop do financiranja ponujajo institucije, ki izvajajo cilje javne politike ali kako drugače ne delujejo neodvisno od države.
In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that this is the case when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials and energy, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by substantial government intervention.
Komisija bi morala pripraviti, objaviti in redno posodabljati poročila o znatnem izkrivljanju, na podlagi katerih bi lahko bila uvedena protidampinška preiskava, v njih pa opisati tržne razmere v zvezi s temi primeri v posamezni državi ali posameznem sektorju.
It is further appropriate to clarify that when assessing the existence of significant distortions regard should be had, inter alia, to the potential impact of one or more of the following elements: the market in question being to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; the lack, discriminatory application or inadequate enforcement of bankruptcy, corporate or property laws; wage costs being distorted; access to finance granted by institutions which implement public policy objectives or otherwise not acting independently of the state.
Takšna poročila in dokaze, na katere se opirajo, bi bilo treba priložiti spisu kakršne koli preiskave, ki se nanaša na navedeno državo ali sektor.
The Commission should produce, make public and regularly update reports on significant distortions, which could potentially result in an anti-dumping investigation, describing the market circumstances concerning those instances in a certain country or a certain sector.
V takšnih preiskavah bi morale imeti zainteresirane strani dovolj priložnosti, da podajo pripombe glede poročil in dokazov, na katere se opirajo.
Such reports and the evidence on which they are based should be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector.
Pri ugotavljanju obstoja znatnega izkrivljanja bi bilo treba upoštevati ustrezne mednarodne standarde, vključno z osrednjimi konvencijami Mednarodne organizacije dela (MOD) in ustreznimi večstranskimi okoljskimi konvencijami, kadar je to ustrezno.
In such investigations, interested parties should have ample opportunity to comment on the reports and the evidence on which they are based.
Stroški se običajno izračunajo na podlagi evidenc, ki jih hrani preiskovani izvoznik in proizvajalec.
When assessing the existence of significant distortions, relevant international standards, including core conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and relevant multilateral environmental conventions, should be taken into account, where appropriate.
Kadar pa v državi izvoznici obstaja znatno neposredno ali posredno izkrivljanje, zaradi česar so stroški v evidencah zadevne stranke umetno nizki, se lahko takšni stroški prilagodijo ali določijo na kateri koli razumni podlagi, vključno z informacijami, ki izhajajo iz drugih reprezentativnih trgov ali mednarodnih cen ali referenčnih vrednosti.
Costs are normally calculated on the basis of records kept by the exporter and producer under investigation.
Uporabijo se lahko tudi domači stroški, vendar le, če se na podlagi točnih in ustreznih dokazov zanesljivo ugotovi, da niso izkrivljeni.
However, where there are direct or indirect significant distortions in the exporting country with the consequence that costs reflected in the records of the party concerned are artificially low, such costs may be adjusted or established on any reasonable basis, including information from other representative markets or from international prices or benchmarks.
Kadar se podatki zbirajo v reprezentativnih državah in mora Komisija ugotoviti, ali je raven socialne zaščite in varstva okolja v teh državah ustrezna, je potrebno, da Komisija preuči, ali te države upoštevajo temeljne konvencije MOD in ustrezne večstranske okoljske konvencije.
Domestic costs may also be used, but only to the extent that they are positively established not to be distorted, on the basis of accurate and appropriate evidence.
Kadar je del stroškov izvoznika in proizvajalca izkrivljen, tudi kadar določeni podatki izvirajo iz različnih virov, bi se moral ta del stroškov nadomestiti z neizkrivljenimi stroški.
When data are sourced in representative countries and the Commission has to establish whether the level of social and environmental protection in such countries is adequate, it is necessary for the Commission to examine whether those countries comply with core ILO and relevant multilateral environmental conventions.
Glede na izkušnje iz preteklih postopkov je primerno dodatno pojasniti, da bi se za namene ugotavljanja obstoja znatnega izkrivljanja v tretji državi morali ustrezno upoštevati vsi relevantni dokazi o okoliščinah na domačem trgu izvoznikov in proizvajalcev iz te države, ki so bili priloženi spisu in glede katerih so imele zainteresirane strani priložnost podati pripombe, kar vključuje možnost za te izvoznike in proizvajalce, da nedvoumno dokažejo, da njihovi domači stroški niso izkrivljeni.
Where part of the costs for an exporter and producer is distorted, including where a given input is sourced from different sources, that part of the costs should be replaced by undistorted costs.
Takšni dokazi vključujejo ustrezna poročila, kadar so na voljo.
In light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to further clarify that, for the purposes of determining the existence of significant distortions in a third country, due account should be taken of all relevant evidence regarding the circumstances prevailing on the domestic market of the exporters and producers from that country, which has been placed on the file, and upon which interested parties have had an opportunity to comment, including an opportunity for those exporters and producers to conclusively show that their domestic costs are undistorted.
Znake glede obstoja znatnega izkrivljanja lahko predstavijo tudi vsi ustrezni deležniki, vključno z industrijo in sindikati Unije.
Where available, such evidence includes relevant reports.
Pri odločanju o pripravi ali posodobitvi ustreznih poročil bi bilo treba upoštevati te znake in to, da je treba preprečiti, da bi bila industrija Unije zaradi uporabe protidampinškega instrumenta še bolj obremenjena, zlasti glede na ekonomske in trgovinske posebnosti malih in srednjih podjetij.
Indications as to the existence of significant distortions may also be presented by all relevant stakeholders, including Union industry and trade unions.
V zvezi z metodologijo, uporabljeno v prvotni preiskavi in ki jo je treba uporabiti v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom, se uporablja člen 11(9) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036.
Such indications and the need to avoid any additional burdens for Union industry in using the anti-dumping instrument, in particular in view of the economic and trade specificities of small and medium-sized enterprises, should be considered when deciding on preparing or updating the relevant reports.
V tem okviru je ustrezno pojasniti, da bi bilo treba pri preučevanju, ali obstajajo znaki, da so se okoliščine spremenile, ustrezno upoštevati vse relevantne dokaze, vključno z ustreznimi poročili o okoliščinah, ki prevladujejo na domačem trgu izvoznikov in proizvajalcev, in dokazi, na katerih poročila temeljijo, ki so bili priloženi spisu in glede katerih so imele zainteresirane strani priložnost predložiti pripombe.
With respect to the methodology used in the original investigation and to be used in the review investigation, Article 11(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 applies.
V odsotnosti drugih posebnih prehodnih pravil, ki urejajo to področje, je primerno določiti, da se ta uredba uporablja za vse odločitve o začetku postopka ter za vse postopke, vključno s prvotnimi preiskavami in preiskavami v zvezi s pregledi, ki se začnejo 20. decembra 2017 ali po tem dnevu, ob upoštevanju člena 11(9) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036.
In that context, it is appropriate to clarify that, when examining whether there is an indication that circumstances have changed, due account should be taken of all relevant evidence, including relevant reports regarding the circumstances prevailing on the domestic market of the exporters and producers and the evidence on which they are based, which has been placed on the file, and upon which interested parties have had an opportunity to comment.
Poleg tega bi se morala s posebnim prehodnim pravilom za obstoječe ukrepe in ob upoštevanju, da ni nobenih drugih posebnih prehodnih pravil, ki bi urejala to področje, v primeru prehoda z normalne vrednosti, izračunane v skladu s členom 2(7) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036, na normalno vrednost, izračunano v skladu z metodologijo iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036, kakor je spremenjena s to uredbo, prvotna metodologija uporabljati do začetka prvega pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa po takem prehodu.
In the absence of any other specific transitional rules regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide for the application of this Regulation to all decisions on the initiation of proceedings, and to all proceedings, including original investigations and review investigations, initiated on or after 20 December 2017, subject to Article 11(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.
Da bi se zmanjšalo tveganje izogibanja določbam te uredbe, bi bilo treba enak pristop uporabljati v zvezi s pregledi, opravljenimi v skladu s členom 11(4) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036.
Furthermore, by way of specific transitional rule for existing measures, and having regard to the absence of any other specific transitional rules regulating the matter, in the case of a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Article 2(7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 to a normal value calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 as amended by this Regulation, the original methodology should continue to apply until the initiation of the first expiry review following such transition.
Primerno je opozoriti tudi, da prehod z normalne vrednosti, izračunane v skladu s členom 2(7), na normalno vrednost, izračunano v skladu z metodologijo iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036, kakor je spremenjena s to uredbo, sam po sebi ne bi predstavljal zadostnega dokaza v smislu člena 11(3) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036.
With a view to reducing the risk of circumvention of the provisions of this Regulation, the same approach should apply with respect to reviews conducted pursuant to Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.
Takšna prehodna pravila bi morala zapolniti pravno praznino, ki bi drugače lahko ustvarila pravno negotovost, zagotoviti razumno možnost, da se zainteresirane strani prilagodijo na iztek veljavnosti starih pravil in začetek veljavnosti novih, ter olajšati učinkovito, urejeno in pravično izvajanje Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036.
It is also appropriate to recall that a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Article 2(7) to a normal value calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 as amended by this Regulation would not in itself constitute sufficient evidence within the meaning of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.
Z Uredbo (EU) 2016/1037 [5] sta Evropski parlament in Svet sprejela skupna pravila za zaščito proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso države članice Unije.
Such transitional rules should fill a lacuna that would otherwise risk generating legal uncertainty, provide a reasonable opportunity for interested parties to adapt themselves to the expiry of the old rules and the entry into force of the new rules, and facilitate the efficient, orderly and equitable administration of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.
Izkušnje kažejo, da se dejanski obseg subvencioniranja običajno odkrije med zadevno preiskavo.
By Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 [5], the European Parliament and the Council adopted common rules for protection against subsidised imports from countries that are not Member States of the Union.
Zlasti imajo preiskovani izvozniki pogosto koristi od subvencij, za katere pred preiskavo razumno ni bilo mogoče vedeti.
Experience has shown that the actual magnitude of subsidisation is usually discovered during the relevant investigation.
Primerno je pojasniti, da bi Komisija morala, kadar se takšne subvencije odkrijejo v okviru posamezne preiskave ali pregleda, omogočiti dodatna posvetovanja z zadevno državo porekla in/ali izvoza v zvezi s takšnimi subvencijami, ugotovljenimi med preiskavo.
In particular, investigated exporters are frequently found to benefit from subsidies whose existence could not have been reasonably known before carrying out the investigation.
Če ni drugih posebnih prehodnih pravil, ki urejajo to področje, je primerno določiti, da se ta uredba uporablja za vse odločitve o začetku postopka ter za vse postopke, vključno s prvotnimi preiskavami in preiskavami v zvezi s pregledi, ki se začnejo 20. decembra 2017 ali po tem dnevu.
It is appropriate to clarify that, when such subsidies are found in the course of any given investigation or review, the Commission should offer additional consultations to the country of origin and/or export concerned with regard to such subsidies identified in the course of the investigation.
Uredbi (EU) 2016/1036 in (EU) 2016/1037 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
In the absence of specific transitional rules regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide for the application of this Regulation to all decisions on the initiation of proceedings, and to all proceedings, including original investigations and review investigations, initiated on or after 20 December 2017.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Člen 1
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Uredba (EU) 2016/1036 se spremeni:
Article 1
v členu 2 se vstavi naslednji odstavek:
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 is amended as follows:
Če se pri uporabi te ali katere koli druge ustrezne določbe te uredbe ugotovi, da ni primerno uporabiti domačih cen in stroškov v državi izvoznici zaradi znatnega izkrivljanja v tej državi v smislu točke (b), se normalna vrednost računsko določi izključno na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje in prodaje, ki odražajo neizkrivljene cene ali referenčne vrednosti, in sicer ob upoštevanju naslednjih pravil.
in Article 2, the following paragraph is inserted:
Viri, ki jih Komisija lahko uporabi, vključujejo:
In case it is determined, when applying this or any other relevant provision of this Regulation, that it is not appropriate to use domestic prices and costs in the exporting country due to the existence in that country of significant distortions within the meaning of point (b), the normal value shall be constructed exclusively on the basis of costs of production and sale reflecting undistorted prices or benchmarks, subject to the following rules.
ustrezne stroške proizvodnje in prodaje v primerni reprezentativni državi, ki je po gospodarski razvitosti podobna državi izvoznici, pod pogojem, da so relevantni podatki o stroških na voljo takoj; kadar je takšnih držav več, se prednost nameni državam z ustrezno ravnjo socialne zaščite in varstva okolja, kjer je to ustrezno;
The sources the Commission may use include:
če meni, da je to ustrezno, neizkrivljene mednarodne cene, stroške ali referenčna merila; ali
corresponding costs of production and sale in an appropriate representative country with a similar level of economic development as the exporting country, provided the relevant data are readily available; where there is more than one such country, preference shall be given, where appropriate, to countries with an adequate level of social and environmental protection;
domače stroške, vendar le, če se na podlagi točnih in ustreznih dokazov zanesljivo ugotovi, da niso izkrivljeni, tudi v okviru določb o zainteresiranih straneh iz točke (c).
if it considers appropriate, undistorted international prices, costs, or benchmarks; or
Brez poseganja v člen 17 se ta ocena ločeno opravi za vsakega izvoznika in proizvajalca.
domestic costs, but only to the extent that they are positively established not to be distorted, on the basis of accurate and appropriate evidence, including in the framework of the provisions on interested parties in point (c).
Računsko določena normalna vrednost vključuje neizkrivljen in razumen znesek za upravne, prodajne in splošne stroške ter za dobiček.
Without prejudice to Article 17, that assessment shall be done for each exporter and producer separately.
Znatno izkrivljanje je izkrivljanje, do katerega pride, kadar sporočene cene ali stroški, vključno s stroški surovin in energije, niso rezultat sil prostega trga, in sicer zaradi znatnega poseganja države.
The constructed normal value shall include an undistorted and reasonable amount for administrative, selling and general costs and for profits.
Pri ugotavljanju obstoja znatnega izkrivljanja se med drugim upošteva možni učinek enega ali več naslednjih elementov:
Significant distortions are those distortions which occur when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials and energy, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by substantial government intervention.
ali zadevni trg v veliki meri oskrbujejo podjetja, ki delujejo v okviru lastništva, pod nadzorom ali pod nadzorom politik ali po navodilih organov države izvoznice;
In assessing the existence of significant distortions regard shall be had, inter alia, to the potential impact of one or more of the following elements:
ali prisotnost države v podjetjih državi omogoča, da vpliva na cene ali stroške;
the market in question being served to a significant extent by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country;
ali javne politike ali ukrepi diskriminirajo v korist domačih dobaviteljev ali kako drugače vplivajo na sile prostega trga;
state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs;
ali je prisotno pomanjkanje zakonodaje o stečaju, družbah ali lastnini, ali diskriminatorna uporaba ali nezadostno izvrševanje navedene zakonodaje;
public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces;
ali so stroški plač izkrivljeni;
the lack, discriminatory application or inadequate enforcement of bankruptcy, corporate or property laws;
ali dostop do financiranja ponujajo institucije, ki izvajajo cilje javne politike ali kako drugače ne delujejo neodvisno od države.
wage costs being distorted;
Kadar ima Komisija utemeljene informacije glede morebitnega obstoja znatnega izkrivljanja v smislu točke (b) v posamezni državi ali posameznem sektorju v tej državi in če je to ustrezno za učinkovito uporabo te uredbe, Komisija pripravi, objavi in redno posodablja poročilo, v katerem opiše tržne razmere iz točke (b) v tej državi ali sektorju.
access to finance granted by institutions which implement public policy objectives or otherwise not acting independently of the state.
Takšna poročila in dokazi, na katere se poročila opirajo, se priložijo spisu katere koli preiskave, ki se nanaša na navedeno državo ali navedeni sektor.
Where the Commission has well-founded indications of the possible existence of significant distortions as referred to in point (b) in a certain country or a certain sector in that country, and where appropriate for the effective application of this Regulation, the Commission shall produce, make public and regularly update a report describing the market circumstances referred to in point (b) in that country or sector.
Zainteresirane strani morajo imeti dovolj priložnosti, da izpodbijajo ali dopolnijo poročilo in dokaze, na katere se poročilo opira, podajo pripombe v zvezi z njimi ali se oprejo nanje pri vsaki preiskavi, v kateri se takšno poročilo ali dokazi uporabljajo.
Such reports and the evidence on which they are based shall be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector.
Komisija pri ugotavljanju obstoja znatnega izkrivljanja upošteva vse ustrezne dokaze, ki so prisotni v spisu preiskave.
Interested parties shall have ample opportunity to rebut, supplement, comment or rely on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used.
Pri vložitvi pritožbe v skladu s členom 5 ali zahtevka za pregled v skladu s členom 11 se lahko industrija Unije opre na dokaze iz poročila iz točke (c) tega odstavka, kadar je zadoščeno dokaznemu standardu ob upoštevanju člena 5(9), da bi utemeljila izračun normalne vrednosti.
In assessing the existence of significant distortions, the Commission shall take into account all the relevant evidence that is on the investigation file.
Kadar Komisija ugotovi, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi v skladu s členom 5(9) glede znatnega izkrivljanja v smislu točke (b) tega odstavka, in se odloči, da bo na podlagi tega začela preiskavo, se to navede v obvestilu o začetku preiskave.
When filing a complaint in accordance with Article 5, or a request for a review in accordance with Article 11, Union industry may rely on the evidence in the report referred to in point (c) of this paragraph, where meeting the standard of evidence in view of Article 5(9), in order to justify the calculation of the normal value.
Komisija zbere podatke, ki so potrebni za računsko določitev normalne vrednosti v skladu s točko (a) tega odstavka.