natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
International short-term issue rating scale
Lestvica mednarodnih kratkoročnih ocen izdaj
Corporate long-term rating scale
Lestvica dolgoročnih ocen podjetij
Long-term rating scale
Lestvica dolgoročnih ocen
Global long-term rating scale
Lestvica globalnih dolgoročnih ocen
Short-term credit rating scale
Lestvica kratkoročnih bonitetnih ocen
Long-term obligations rating scale
Lestvica ocen dolgoročnih obveznosti
Commercial paper and short-term debt rating scale
Lestvica ocen komercialnih zapisov in kratkoročnega dolga
Claims paying ability rating scale
Lestvica ocen odplačevanja terjatev
Short-term rating scale
Lestvica kratkoročnih ocen
FERI EuroRating rating scale
Lestvica ocen agencije FERI EuroRating
Fitch France S.A.S., Fitch Deutschland GmbH, Fitch Italia SpA, Fitch Polska SA, Fitch Ratings España S.A.U., Fitch Ratings Limited UK, Fitch Ratings CIS Limited
Fitch France S.A.S., Fitch Deutschland GmbH, Fitch Italia S.p.A, Fitch Polska S.A., Fitch Ratings España S.A.U., Fitch Ratings Limited UK, Fitch Ratings CIS Limited
Corporate finance obligations — Long-term ratings scale
Finančne obveznosti podjetij – lestvica dolgoročnih ocen
Long-term international IFS ratings scale
Lestvica dolgoročnih mednarodnih ocen finančne moči zavarovatelja (IFS)
Short-term IFS ratings scale
Lestvica kratkoročnih ocen finančne moči zavarovatelja (IFS)
Long-term issuer ratings scale
Lestvica dolgoročnih ocen izdajateljev
Long-term issue ratings scale
Lestvica dolgoročnih ocen izdaj
Short-term issuer ratings scale
Lestvica kratkoročnih ocen izdajateljev
Short-term issue credit ratings scale
Lestvica kratkoročnih bonitetnih ocen izdaj
Bond fund rating scale
Lestvica ocen obvezniških skladov
Global short-term rating scale
Lestvica globalnih kratkoročnih ocen
Long-term issue credit ratings scale
Lestvica dolgoročnih bonitetnih ocen izdaj
Insurer financial strength ratings scale
Lestvica ocen finančne moči zavarovatelja
Fund credit quality ratings scale
Lestvica ocen kreditne kakovosti skladov
Mid market evaluation ratings scale
Lestvica ocen za vrednotenje srednjih podjetij (MME)
Short-term issuer credit ratings scale
Lestvica kratkoročnih bonitetnih ocen izdajateljev
International long-term rating scale
Lestvica mednarodnih dolgoročnih ocen
Sovereign rating band scale
Lestvica razpona ocen za države
ccc+, ccc, ccc-, cc, c, rs
ccc+, ccc, ccc–, cc, c, rs
ccc+, ccc, ccc-, cc, c, d
ccc+, ccc, ccc–, cc, c, d
AMB- 4
aa+, aa, aa–
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1801
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1801
on laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the mapping of credit assessments of external credit assessment institutions for securitisation in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o določitvi izvedbenih tehničnih standardov v zvezi z vzporejanjem bonitetnih ocen zunanjih bonitetnih agencij za listinjenje v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 [1], and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 270 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o bonitetnih zahtevah za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 [1] in zlasti tretjega pododstavka člena 270 Uredbe,
Article 270 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 requires the specification for all external credit assessment institutions (ECAIs), of the correspondence of the relevant credit assessments issued by an ECAI to the credit quality steps set out in Chapter 5 of that Regulation (‘mapping’).
Člen 270 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 zahteva, da se za vse zunanje bonitetne agencije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ECAI) določi, kateri stopnji kreditne kakovosti iz poglavja 5 navedene uredbe ustrezajo zadevne bonitetne ocene ECAI (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vzporejanje).
ECAIs are credit rating agencies that are registered or certified in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] or a central bank issuing credit ratings which are exempt from the application of that Regulation.
ECAI so bonitetne agencije, ki so registrirane ali certificirane v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1060/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], ali centralne banke, ki izdajajo bonitetne ocene in so izvzete iz uporabe navedene uredbe.
Certain similar terms and concepts used in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 and in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 can be the subject of confusion.
Nekateri podobni izrazi in pojmi, uporabljeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 1060/2009 in Uredbi (EU) št. 575/2013, bi lahko povzročili zmedo.
‘Credit assessment’ is a term used under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 to refer both to the ‘labels’ of the different categories of ratings by ECAIs, and to the assignment of one such rating to a particular item.
„Bonitetna ocena“ je izraz, ki se v Uredbi (EU) št. 575/2013 uporablja tako za poimenovanje „oznake“ različnih bonitetnih kategorij s strani ECAI, kot tudi za dodelitev posamezne tovrstne ocene določeni postavki.
However, points (h) and (a) of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 clearly distinguish between these two concepts with the use of the terms ‘rating category’ and ‘credit rating’, respectively.
Toda točki (h) in (a) člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009 jasno razlikujeta med tema dvema pojmoma z uporabo izrazov „bonitetna kategorija“ oziroma „bonitetna ocena“.
To avoid confusion and given the need to refer to these two particular concepts separately and given the complementarity of the two Regulations, those terms should be applied in this Regulation within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Da bi se izognili zmedi in ob upoštevanju potrebe, da se za navedena pojma uporabljata različni poimenovanji, ter glede na dopolnjevanje obeh uredb, bi bilo treba navedene izraze v tej uredbi uporabljati v smislu Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009.
Article 267 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 permits the use of credit ratings to determine the risk weight of a securitisation position only where that credit rating has been issued or has been endorsed by an ECAI in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Člen 267 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 dovoljuje uporabo bonitetnih ocen za določanje uteži tveganja za pozicijo v listinjenju le, če je bonitetno oceno izdala ali potrdila ECAI v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1060/2009.
Further, point (b) of Article 268 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 makes use of a credit rating of an ECAI conditional on the ECAI having published the procedures, methodologies, assumptions and the key elements underpinning the assessments, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Nadalje točka (b) člena 268 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 uporabo bonitetne ocene ECAI pogojuje s tem, da ECAI objavi postopke, metodologije, predpostavke in ključne elemente, ki so temelj ocene, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1060/2009.
In addition, Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 provides that rating categories that are attributed to structured finance instruments are clearly differentiated from rating categories used for any other entities.
Poleg tega člen 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009 določa, da se bonitetne kategorije, ki se dodelijo strukturiranim finančnim instrumentom, jasno razlikujejo od bonitetnih kategorij, ki se uporabljajo za vse druge subjekte.
Therefore, it is appropriate to specify only the correspondence of the credit assessments of ECAIs to the credit quality steps set out in Chapter 5 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 for those rating categories to securitisation positions that meet all of those conditions.
Zato je primerno določiti ustrezanje bonitetnih ocen ECAI stopnjam kreditne kakovosti iz poglavja 5 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 le za tiste bonitetne kategorije pozicij v listinjenju, ki izpolnjujejo vse navedene pogoje.
Mappings of credit ratings for securitisation positions should give consideration to quantitative factors such as default and loss rates and the historical performance of credit ratings, as well as qualitative factor such as range of transactions, methodologies and meaning of rating categories.
Pri vzporejanju bonitetnih ocen za pozicije v listinjenju bi bilo treba upoštevati tako kvantitativne dejavnike, na primer stopnje neplačil in izgub ter preteklo kakovost bonitetnih ocen, kot tudi kvalitativne dejavnike, na primer razpon poslov, metodologije in pomen bonitetnih kategorij.
Further, as a result of the crisis, both ECAIs' methodologies and the Union regulatory approach to securitisation are undergoing changes and the securitisation framework is also the object of discussions at international level .
V okviru kvalitativne analize se je, da se zagotovi objektivno in dosledno določanje vzporejanja ter nemoten prehod za trg, treba sklicevati na vzporejanje bonitetnih ocen s stopnjami kreditne kakovosti, ki so bile izdane leta 2006 na podlagi člena 97 Direktive 2006/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
In order to take into account these developments in the regulatory framework and the heterogeneous performance of securitisation credit ratings and to avoid disruption to the securitisation market, it is necessary to emphasise the qualitative aspects of the analysis of available quantitative data.
Navedena vzporejanja, ki so se takrat uporabila za ECAI, ki so izdajale bonitetne ocene za pozicije v listinjenju, niso temeljila samo na kvantitativni metodologiji vzporejanja, temveč tudi na preteklih dokazih glede kakovosti bonitetnih ocen pred finančno krizo.
Within the context of a qualitative analysis, in order to ensure an objective and consistent determination of the mapping, and with a view to ensuring a smooth transition for the market, it is necessary to rely on the mapping of credit assessments to credit quality steps that were issued in 2006 on the basis of Article 97 of Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
Ta vzporejanja so bila zasnovana za zagotovitev splošne objektivnosti in doslednosti med relativnimi stopnjami tveganja, ki so jih odražali različni bonitetni razredi, ki so se uporabljali za dodeljevanje bonitetnih ocen ECAI, ki so bile takrat dejavne na trgu listinjenja.
Those mappings applied to ECAIs issuing securitisation ratings at that time were not only based on a quantitative mapping methodology but also on historical evidence relating to the performance of credit ratings prior to the financial crisis.
Nove ECAI, ki so vstopile na trg listinjenja po izdelavi vzporejanj leta 2006 na podlagi člena 97 Direktive 2006/48/ES, niso dodelile zadostnega števila bonitetnih ocen, da bi bilo mogoče statistično zanesljivo oceniti preteklo kakovost teh ocen.
Those mappings had been designed to ensure overall objectiveness and consistency among the relative degrees of risks expressed by the different rating grades used to assign credit ratings by the ECAIs operating at that point in time in the securitisation market.
Kljub temu je treba vzporejanje bonitetnih ocen glede na stopnje kreditne kakovosti, ki se dodeli uveljavljenim ECAI, razširiti na nove ECAI, da se zagotovi ustrezno ravnovesje med razvojem skrbnega vzporejanja za vse ECAI in preprečevanjem povzročitve znatno podrejenega konkurenčnega položaja.
New ECAIs that have entered the securitisation market after the development of the mappings in 2006 on the basis of Article 97 of Directive 2006/48/EC have not assigned a sufficient number of ratings for the historical performance of those ratings to be assessed with statistical confidence.
Glede na to, da se za izračun zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti po standardiziranem pristopu za listinjenje v skladu s členom 251 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 uporabljajo posebne stopnje kreditne kakovosti, ki se razlikujejo od tistih, ki veljajo za pozicije v listinjenju v skladu z metodo na podlagi bonitetnih ocen iz člena 261 navedene uredbe, bi bilo treba za standardiziran pristop in metodo na podlagi bonitetnih ocen zagotoviti ločeno vzporejanje.
Nevertheless, it is necessary to extend the mapping of credit assessments to credit quality steps that is assigned to long-established ECAIs to new ECAIs, in order to strike the right balance between developing a prudent mapping for all ECAIs and avoiding causing substantial competitive disadvantages.
Tako člen 251 kot člen 261 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 navajata stopnje kreditne kakovosti za pozicije v relistinjenju.
Given that separate credit quality steps apply for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts under the standardised approach for securitisation under Article 251 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, which are different from those applying to securitisation positions under the ratings-based method referred to in Article 261 of that Regulation, separate mappings for the standardised approach and the ratings-based method should be provided.
Zato okvir listinjenja Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 zajema tudi pozicije v relistinjenju.
Both Article 251 and Article 261 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 include references to credit quality steps for re-securitisation positions.
Torej bi morala vzporejanja zajemati bonitetne ocene, dodeljene tako pozicijam v listinjenju kot tistim v relistinjenju.
As a result, the securitisation framework of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 also covers re-securitisation positions.
Po zaključku sedanjih regulativnih reform glede kapitalskih zahtev, ki se uporabljajo za listinjenja, in z namenom upoštevanja novih preteklih dokazov, ki zajemajo podatke za dovolj dolgo obdobje po krizi, bi bilo treba vzporejanja posodobiti, če bi razpoložljivi podatki lahko prispevali k boljši zasnovi v celoti dosledne in objektivne kvantitativne metodologije vzporejanja v skladu s točkama (b) in (c) člena 270 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, ter pri tem zagotoviti vedno večje upoštevanje kvantitativnih dokazov.
Therefore the mappings should cover credit ratings assigned to both securitisation and re-securitisation positions.
Zaradi poudarka na kvalitativnih vidikih analize kakovosti bonitetnih ocen za pozicije v listinjenju je treba redno spremljati sporočene podatke, da se preuči upravičenost pregleda dodeljenih vzporejanj v primeru, da se zaznajo neplačila za pozicije v listinjenju, ter preučiti možnost spremembe določanja vzporejanj, če je ustrezno, v skladu s točko (d) člena 270 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
Following the completion of the ongoing regulatory reforms relating to capital requirements applicable to securitisations, and with the aim of considering new historical evidence covering a sufficiently long post-crisis data history, the mappings should be updated where available information could contribute to an improved design of a fully consistent and objective quantitative mapping methodology, in accordance with points (b) and (c) of Article 270 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, and with increasing consideration of quantitative evidence.
Ta uredba temelji na osnutkih izvedbenih tehničnih standardov, ki jih je Komisiji predložil Evropski nadzorni organ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Evropski bančni organ).
Given the emphasis on the qualitative aspects of the analysis of the performance of securitisation ratings, it is necessary to regularly monitor the data reported in order to consider the merit of reviewing the mappings assigned, where default of securitisation positions are observed, and to consider amending the determination of the mappings, as appropriate, in accordance with point (d) of Article 270 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Evropski bančni organ je o osnutkih izvedbenih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, izvedel odprta javna posvetovanja, analiziral morebitne s tem povezane stroške in koristi ter zaprosil za mnenje interesno skupino za bančništvo, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] –
This Regulation is based on the draft implementing technical standards submitted by the European supervisory authority (European Banking Authority) to the Commission.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Razpredelnice za vzporejanje v skladu s standardiziranim pristopom
Article 1
Bonitetne kategorije posamezne ECAI za pozicije v listinjenju, za katere se uporablja standardizirani pristop, ustrezajo stopnjam kreditne kakovosti v skladu s standardiziranim pristopom iz razpredelnice 1 člena 251 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 tako, kot je določeno v Prilogi I k tej uredbi.
Mapping tables under the standardised approach
Člen 2
The correspondence of the rating categories of each ECAI for securitisation positions subject to the standardised approach with the credit quality steps under the standardised approach set out in Table 1 of Article 251 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 is that set out in Annex I to this Regulation.
Razpredelnice za vzporejanje v skladu z metodo na podlagi bonitetnih ocen
Article 2
Bonitetne kategorije posamezne ECAI za pozicije v listinjenju, za katere se uporablja pristop IRB, ustrezajo stopnjam kreditne kakovosti iz razpredelnice 4 člena 261(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 tako, kot je določeno v Prilogi II k tej uredbi.
Mapping tables under the ratings-based method
Člen 3
The correspondence of the rating categories of each ECAI for securitisation positions subject to the IRB approach with the credit quality steps set out in Table 4 of Article 261(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 is that set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Začetek veljavnosti
Entry into Force
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 11. oktobra 2016
Done at Brussels, 11 October 2016.
Predsednik
The President
Uredba (ES) št. 1060/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o bonitetnih agencijah (UL L 302, 17.11.2009, str. 1).
OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1.
Direktiva 2006/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti kreditnih institucij (UL L 177, 30.6.2006, str. 1).
Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies (OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o ustanovitvi Evropskega nadzornega organa (Evropski bančni organ) in o spremembi Sklepa št. 716/2009/ES ter razveljavitvi Sklepa Komisije 2009/78/ES (UL L 331, 15.12.2010, str. 12).
Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions (OJ L 177, 30.6.2006, p. 1);
PRILOGA I
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12).
Razpredelnica za vzporejanje v skladu s standardiziranim pristopom iz člena 1
ANNEX I
Stopnja kreditne kakovosti
Mapping table under the standardised approach as referred to in Article 1
Vse druge
All other
Srednjeročne in dolgoročne izdaje
ARC Ratings SA
AAASF do AA–SF
Medium and Long-Term Issues
A+SF do A–SF
AAASF to AA-SF
BBB+SF do BBB–SF
A+SF to A-SF
BB+SF do BB–SF
BBB+SF to BBB-SF
Pod BB–SF
BB+SF to BB-SF
Kratkoročne izdaje
Below BB-SF
Pod A-3SF
Short-Term Issues
Lestvica ocen strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov
Below A-3SF
AAA(sf) do AA–(sf)
Structured finance rating scale
A+(sf) do A–(sf)
AAA(sf) to AA-(sf)
BBB+(sf) do BBB–(sf)
A+(sf) to A-(sf)
BB+(sf) do BB–(sf)
BBB+(sf) to BBB-(sf)
Pod BB–(sf)
BB+(sf) to BB-(sf)
Lestvica dolgoročnih ocen
Below BB-(sf)
A+ sf do A– sf
Long-term rating scale
BBB+ sf do BBB– sf
A+ sf to A- sf
BB+ sf do BB– sf
BBB+ sf to BBB- sf
Pod BB– sf
BB+ sf to BB- sf
Lestvica ocen dolgoročnih obveznosti
Below BB- sf
AAA (sf) do AA (low) (sf)
Long-term obligations rating scale
A (high) (sf) do A (low) (sf)
AAA (sf) to AA (low) (sf)
BBB (high) (sf) do BBB (low) (sf)
A (high) (sf) to A (low) (sf)
BB (high) (sf) do BB (low) (sf)
BBB (high) (sf) to BBB (low) (sf)
Pod BB (low) (sf)
BB (high) (sf) to BB (low) (sf)
Lestvica ocen komercialnih zapisov in kratkoročnega dolga
Below BB (low) (sf)
R-1 (high) (sf) do R-1 (low) (sf)
Commercial paper and short-term debt rating scale
R-2 (high) (sf) do R-2 (low) (sf)
R-1 (high) (sf) to R-1 (low) (sf)
Pod R-3 (sf)
R-2 (high) (sf) to R-2 (low) (sf)
Bonitetna lestvica
Below R-3 (sf)
AAAsf do AA–sf
Rating scale
A+sf do A–sf
AAAsf to AA-sf
BBB+sf do BBB–sf
A+sf to A-sf
BB+sf do BB–sf
BBB+sf to BBB-sf
Pod BB–sf
BB+sf to BB-sf
Lestvica dolgoročnih bonitetnih ocen izdajateljev
Fitch Ratings
Pod F3sf
Long-term issuer credit ratings scale
Lestvica dolgoročnih ocen izdajateljev
Short-term rating scale
AAA do AA–
Below F3sf
A+ do A–
Long-term issuer ratings scale
BBB+ do BBB–
AAA to AA-
BB + do BB-
A+ to A-
Pod BB–
BBB+ to BBB-
Lestvica kratkoročnih ocen izdajateljev
BB+ to BB-
Pod J-3
Below BB-
Dolgoročna posojila
Short-term issuer ratings scale
AAA (sf) do AA– (sf)
Below J-3
A+ (sf) do A– (sf)
Long-Term Credit
BBB+ (sf) do BBB– (sf)
AAA (sf) to AA- (sf)
BB+ (sf) do BB– (sf)
A+ (sf) to A- (sf)
Pod BB– (sf)
BBB+ (sf) to BBB- (sf)
Kratkoročna posojila
BB+ (sf) to BB- (sf)
Pod K3 (sf)
Below BB- (sf)
Lestvica globalnih dolgoročnih ocen
Short-Term Credit
Aaa(sf) do Aa3(sf)
Below K3 (sf)
A1(sf) do A3(sf)
Global long-term rating scale
Baa1(sf) do Baa3(sf)
Aaa(sf) to Aa3(sf)
(sf) do Ba3(sf)
A1(sf) to A3(sf)
Pod Ba3(sf)
Baa1(sf) to Baa3(sf)
Lestvica globalnih kratkoročnih ocen
(sf) to Ba3(sf)
Lestvica kratkoročnih bonitetnih ocen izdajateljev
Below Ba3(sf)
Pod A-3 (sf)
Global short-term rating scale
PRILOGA II
Short-term issuer credit ratings scale
Razpredelnica za vzporejanje v skladu z metodo na podlagi bonitetnih ocen iz člena 2
Below A-3 (sf)
AA+SF do AA–SF
ANNEX II
AA+(sf) do AA–(sf)
Mapping table under the ratings-based method as referred to in Article 2
AA+ sf do AA– sf
AA+SF to AA-SF
AA (high) (sf) do AA (low) (sf)
AA+(sf) to AA-(sf)
AA+sf do AA–sf
AA+ sf to AA- sf
Pod Bsf
BB (low) (sf)
A–SF
AA+sf to AA-sf
BBB–SF
Below Bsf
BB–SF
AA+ to AA-
A–(sf)
AA+ (sf) to AA- (sf)
BBB–(sf)
(sf) to Aa3(sf)
BB–(sf)
Nevertheless, it should be noted that the securitisation credit ratings apply to a wide range of transactions, which have historically performed in a materially heterogeneous manner during the 2007-2009 financial crisis.
A– sf
Certain similar terms and concepts used in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 and in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 can be the subject of confusion.
BB– (sf)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1802
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1802
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 414/2013 specifying a procedure for the authorisation of same biocidal products in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 414/2013 o podrobni določitvi postopka za izdajo dovoljenj za enake biocidne proizvode v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products [1], and in particular Article 17(7) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2012 o dostopnosti na trgu in uporabi biocidnih proizvodov [1] in zlasti člena 17(7) Uredbe,
In Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 414/2013 [2] it is necessary to clarify that an individual product covered under a biocidal product family authorisation is also eligible as a related reference product with a view to obtain an authorisation for a same product.
V Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 414/2013 [2] je treba pojasniti, da je posamezen proizvod, ki ga zajema dovoljenje za družino biocidnih proizvodov, kot povezani referenčni proizvod prav tako upravičen do pridobitve dovoljenja za enak proizvod.