natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 736/2011 [2] approved fluroxypyr as an active substance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 subject to certain conditions requiring the Member States concerned to ensure that the applicant at whose request fluroxypyr was approved provide further confirmatory information on six points, one of which concerned the relevance of the impurities present in the technical specifications.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 736/2011 [2] je odobrila fluroksipir kot aktivno snov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009, pod določeni pogoji, pri čemer je od zadevnih držav članic zahtevala, da zagotovijo, da vlagatelj, na čigar zahtevo je bil fluroksipir odobren, predloži dodatne potrditvene informacije o šestih točkah, od katerih ena zadeva relevantnost nečistoč v tehničnih specifikacijah.
On 25 June 2012 and 5 September 2013 the applicant submitted additional information intended to address the confirmatory data requirements to the rapporteur Member State Ireland within the time period provided for its submission.
Da bi izpolnil zahteve glede potrditvenih informacij, je vlagatelj v za to določenem roku, in sicer 25. junija 2012 in 5. septembra 2013, državi poročevalki Irski predložil dodatne informacije.
Ireland assessed the additional information provided by the applicant.
Irska je ocenila dodatne informacije, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj.
It submitted its own assessment, in the form of an addendum to the draft assessment report, to the other Member States, the Commission and the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, on 22 December 2014 and invited them to comment on the assessment.
Svojo oceno je v obliki dodatka k osnutku poročila o oceni 22. decembra 2014 predložila drugim državam članicam, Komisiji in Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in jih pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe o oceni.
The Authority published a Technical Report [3] summarising the outcome of this consultation process for fluroxypyr on 22 July 2015.
Agencija je 22. julija 2015 objavila tehnično poročilo [3] s povzetkom izida tega posvetovalnega postopka v zvezi s fluroksipirom.
The draft assessment report, the addendum and the Technical Report were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed and finalised on 23 March 2017 in the format of the Commission review report for fluroxypyr.
Osnutek poročila o oceni, dodatek in tehnično poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo ter končno različico pripravile 23. marca 2017 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu fluroksipira.
The Commission invited the applicant to submit its comments on the Commission review report for fluroxypyr.
Komisija je vlagatelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k poročilu o pregledu fluroksipira.
N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) is classified under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] as toxic for reproduction category 1B and has a general concentration limit of 0,3 %.
N-metil-2-pirolidon (NMP) je v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] razvrščen kot strupen za razmnoževanje kategorije 1B in ima splošno mejno koncentracijo 0,3 %.
The presence of NMP in the technical material below 3 g/kg would be highly unlikely to pose any risk to consumers.
Prisotnost NMP v tehničnem materialu pod 3 g/kg zelo verjetno ne bi predstavljala nobenega tveganja za potrošnike.
Hence the Commission has concluded that the additional information provided showed that a maximum level for the toxicologically relevant impurity NMP should be set at less than 3 g/kg (< 0,3 %) in the technical material.
Zato je Komisija sklenila, da so predložene dodatne informacije pokazale, da bi morala biti najvišja vsebnost za toksikološko relevantno nečistočo NMP določena na manj kot 3 g/kg (< 0,3 %) v tehničnem materialu.
In order to ensure a high level of protection for consumers it is, therefore, appropriate to establish a maximum level for this impurity in the commercially manufactured active substance.
Za zagotovitev visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov je zato primerno, da se določi najvišja vsebnost za to nečistočo v aktivni snovi, proizvedeni za trženje.
Member States should be allowed sufficient time to amend or withdraw authorisations for plant protection products containing fluroxypyr.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba omogočiti dovolj časa za spremembo ali preklic registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo fluroksipir.
For plant protection products containing fluroxypyr, where Member States grant any grace period in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, that period should, at the latest, expire on 8 September 2018.
Za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo fluroksipir in pri katerih države članice odobrijo morebitno prehodno obdobje v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, bi se moralo navedeno obdobje izteči najpozneje 8. septembra 2018.
Member States shall in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, where necessary amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing fluroxypyr as the active substance by 8 September 2017 at the latest.
Države članice v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 najpozneje do 8. septembra 2017 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo veljavne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo fluroksipir kot aktivno snov.
Any grace period granted by Member States in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 shall be as short as possible and shall expire by 8 September 2018 at the latest.
Morebitno prehodno obdobje, ki ga države članice odobrijo v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, je čim krajše, izteče pa se najpozneje 8. septembra 2018.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 736/2011 of 26 July 2011 approving the active substance fluroxypyr, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ L 195, 27.7.2011, p. 37).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 736/2011 z dne 26. julija 2011 o odobritvi aktivne snovi fluroksipir v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in spremembi Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 (UL L 195, 27.7.2011, str. 37).
Technical report on the outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for fluroxypyr in light of confirmatory data.
Tehnično poročilo o izidu posvetovanja z državami članicami, vlagateljem in EFSA o oceni tveganja pesticidov za fluroksipir ob upoštevanju potrditvenih podatkov.
43 pp.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 z dne 25. maja 2011 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede seznama registriranih aktivnih snovi (UL L 153, 11.6.2011, str.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances (OJ L 153, 11.6.2011, p.
PRILOGA
1).
Stolpec „Čistost“ za fluroksipir v vrstici 9 dela B Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
ANNEX
„≥ 950 g/kg (fluroksipir-meptil)
The column ‘Purity’ of row 9, fluroxypyr, of Part B of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is replaced by the following:
Naslednja proizvodna nečistoča je s toksikološkega vidika problematična in ne sme presegati naslednje količine v tehničnem materialu:
‘≥ 950 g/kg (fluroxypyr-meptyl)
N-metil-2-pirolidon (NMP): < 3 g/kg“
The following manufacturing impurity is of toxicological concern and must not exceed the following amount in the technical material:
Stolpec „Posebne določbe“ za fluroksipir v vrstici 9 dela B Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP): < 3 g/kg’
„DEL A
The column ‘Specific provisions’ of row 9, fluroxypyr, of Part B of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is replaced by the following:
Registrira se lahko samo kot herbicid.
Only uses as herbicide may be authorised.
Za izvajanje enotnih načel iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 se upoštevajo ugotovitve iz poročila o pregledu fluroksipira ter zlasti dodatka I in II h končni različici poročila, ki jo je Stalni odbor za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo pripravil 23. marca 2017.
PART B
V tej celoviti oceni morajo biti države članice zlasti pozorne na:
For the implementation of the uniform principles referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on fluroxypyr, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed on 23 March 2017 shall be taken into account.
morebitno onesnaženje podzemne vode z metabolitom fluroksipir piridinolom, če se aktivna snov uporablja na območjih z alkalnimi ali občutljivimi tlemi ali neugodnimi podnebnimi razmerami;
In this overall assessment, Member States must pay particular attention to:
tveganje za vodne organizme.
the potential contamination of groundwater by metabolite fluroxypyr pyridinol, when the active substance is applied in regions with alkaline or vulnerable soil or with vulnerable climatic conditions;
Pogoji za registracijo po potrebi vključujejo ukrepe za zmanjšanje tveganja.“
the risk to aquatic organisms.
43 str.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/857
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/857
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/858
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/858
on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the ninth partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080
o določitvi najnižje prodajne cene za posneto mleko v prahu za deveti delni razpis v okviru razpisnega postopka, odprtega z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/2080
In the light of the tenders received for the ninth partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should not be fixed.
Glede na ponudbe, predložene za deveti delni razpis, ni treba določiti najnižje prodajne cene.
For the ninth partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 16 May 2017, a minimum selling price has not been fixed.
Za deveti delni razpis za prodajo posnetega mleka v prahu v okviru razpisnega postopka, odprtega z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/2080, katerega rok za predložitev ponudb je potekel 16. maja 2017, se najnižja prodajna cena ne določi.
on classes of arrangements to be protected in a partial property transfer under Article 76 of Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
o razredih dogovorov, ki se varujejo pri delnem prenosu lastništva v skladu s členom 76 Direktive 2014/59/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [1], and in particular Article 76 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2014/59/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o vzpostavitvi okvira za sanacijo ter reševanje kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij ter o spremembi Šeste direktive Sveta 82/891/EGS ter direktiv 2001/24/ES, 2002/47/ES, 2004/25/ES, 2005/56/ES, 2007/36/ES, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU in 2013/36/EU in uredb (EU) št. 1093/2010 ter (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1] in zlasti člena 76 Direktive,
Directive 2014/59/EU requires Member States to ensure the protection of certain classes of arrangements during the partial transfer of assets, rights and liabilities of an institution under resolution.
Direktiva 2014/59/EU od držav članic zahteva, da zagotovijo varstvo določenih razredov dogovorov med delnim prenosom sredstev, pravic in obveznosti institucije v postopku reševanja.
The same protection is required when a resolution authority forcibly modifies the terms of a contract to which the institution under resolution is party.
Enaka raven varstva se zahteva, ko organ za reševanje izsili spremembo pogojev pogodbe, v kateri je institucija ena od strank.
That protection aims to prevent, when a partial transfer or a contractual modification has been effected, the splitting of assets, rights and liabilities which are linked to each other by virtue of those arrangements.
Cilj tega varstva je v primeru delnega prenosa ali spremembe pogodbe preprečiti ločitev sredstev, pravic in obveznosti, ki so medsebojno povezane na podlagi navedenih dogovorov.
To ensure the proper application of this protection, it is necessary to identify precisely the types of arrangements that fall under the scope of each of the classes set out under Directive 2014/59/EU.
Da bi se zagotovilo ustrezno izvajanje tega varstva, je pomembno natančno določiti vrste dogovorov, ki spadajo v vsakega od razredov, opredeljenih v Direktivi 2014/59/EU.
The method most appropriate for this identification is to provide detailed rules and definitions, in addition to those set out under Directive 2014/59/EU.
Najprimernejša metoda za to določitev je zagotoviti podrobna pravila in opredelitve poleg tistih iz Direktive 2014/59/EU.
This is preferable to establishing a list of specific arrangements that may be entered into under the different national Member State laws, as such a list would be difficult to complete and would need to be continuously updated.
To je primernejša možnost kot oblikovanje seznama specifičnih dogovorov, ki se lahko sklenejo v skladu z različnimi nacionalnimi zakoni držav članic, saj bi bilo tak seznam težko sestaviti in bi ga bilo treba nenehno posodabljati.
As such this regulation should clarify and restrict, where necessary, the scope of application of the various forms of protection provided for by Directive 2014/59/EU for each class of arrangements.
Ta uredba bi morala tako pojasniti in po potrebi omejiti obseg uporabe različnih oblik varstva, ki jih zagotavlja Direktiva 2014/59/EU, za vsak razred dogovorov.
The various classes of arrangements set out in Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU are detailed to varying degrees: some classes are fully specified, while others are determined in vaguer terms.
Različni razredi dogovorov iz člena 76(2) Direktive 2014/59/EU so opredeljeni z različnimi ravnmi podrobnosti: nekateri razredi so v celoti opredeljeni, drugi pa so opisani splošneje.
In addition, some classes refer to one type of contractual relationship and liability or to a limited set of contractual relationships and liabilities, while others cover a greater number and an open range of contractual liabilities, transactions and relationships.
Poleg tega se nekateri razredi nanašajo na eno vrsto pogodbenega razmerja in obveznosti ali na omejen niz pogodbenih razmerij in obveznosti, drugi pa zajemajo večje število in odprt nabor pogodbenih obveznosti, transakcij in razmerij.
Those latter classes could potentially encompass all of the legal and contractual relationships between an institution and one or more of its counterparties.
Ti slednji bi lahko potencialno obsegali vsa pravna in pogodbena razmerja med institucijo in eno ali več od njenih nasprotnih strank.
If those classes of arrangements were to be fully protected, resolution authorities could find it difficult to effect partial transfers, if at all.
Če bi bili ti razredi dogovorov popolnoma zaščiteni, bi organi za reševanje imeli težave pri izvrševanju delnih prenosov, če bi bili ti sploh mogoči.
It is therefore appropriate to avoid an excessive protection that could potentially extend to all of the assets, rights and liabilities between an institution and its counterparties.
Zato je primerno preprečiti prekomerno zaščito, ki bi se lahko potencialno razširila na vsa sredstva, pravice in obveznosti med institucijo in njenimi nasprotnimi strankami.
Some classes of protected arrangements are defined in broader terms in Directive 2014/59/EU.
Nekateri razredi zaščitenih dogovorov so v Direktivi 2014/59/EU opredeljeni bolj na široko.
In order to enhance certainty in terms of scope, namely in relation to security arrangements, set-off and netting arrangements and structured finance arrangements those classes should be further specified.
Da bi se povečala gotovost v smislu obsega, in sicer v zvezi z dogovori o jamstvu, dogovori o poravnavi, dogovori o pobotu ter strukturiranimi finančnimi dogovori, bi bilo treba navedene razrede podrobneje opredeliti.
This Delegated Regulation should not prevent the resolution authorities to further specify in partial transfers those types of set- off and netting arrangements to be protected in individual partial transfers, where those arrangements are recognised for risk mitigation purposes under the applicable prudential rules, and the protection, in particular by non-separability, is a condition for that recognition.
Ta delegirana uredba organom za reševanje ne bi smela preprečevati, da pri delnih prenosih podrobneje opredelijo tiste vrste dogovorov o poravnavi in pobotu, ki jih je treba varovati pri posameznih delnih prenosih, če se ti dogovori priznajo za namene zmanjševanja tveganj v skladu z relevantnimi bonitetnimi pravili in je zaščita, zlasti na podlagi neločljivosti, pogoj za to priznanje.
The resolution authorities should be allowed to decide on such extended protection in individual resolution cases.
Organom za reševanje bi moralo biti dovoljeno, da se odločijo o takšnem podaljšanjem varstvu v posameznih primerih reševanja.
The counterparties of the institution may agree on a so-called ‘catch-all’ or sweep-up ‘set-off’ agreement including any and all rights and liabilities between the parties.
Nasprotne stranke institucije se lahko dogovorijo o tako imenovanem „vseobsegajočem“ oziroma „vsezajemajočem“ dogovoru o poravnavi, ki vključuje čisto vse pravice in obveznosti med strankama.
In consequence of this type of agreement any liabilities between the parties would be protected against being separated from each other.
Pri tej vrsti sporazuma bi bile vse obveznosti med strankama zaščitene pred medsebojno ločitvijo.
This would make the partial transfer with regard to this counterparty unmanageable, and in general would jeopardise the feasibility of the tool altogether, as the resolution authorities might even not be able to discern which liabilities are or are not covered by these arrangements.
To bi pomenilo, da bi bilo delni prenos v zvezi s to nasprotno stranko nemogoče obvladovati in bi bila na splošno ogrožena uspešna uporaba orodja, saj organi za reševanje morda ne bi niti mogli razločiti, katere obveznosti so zajete s temi dogovori in katere niso.
It should then further be clarified that ‘catch all’ or ‘sweep up’ netting and set-off agreements, including any and all assets, rights and liabilities between the parties, should not qualify as protected arrangements.
Zato bi bilo treba dodatno pojasniti, da se „vseobsegajoči“ oziroma „vsezajemajoči“ dogovori o pobotu in dogovori o poravnavi, ki vključujejo čisto vse pravice in obveznosti med strankama, ne bi smeli obravnavati kot zaščiteni dogovori.
Article 80 of Directive 2014/59/EU implies that any narrowing of the scope of the definitions of protected arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU should not affect the operation of trading, clearing and settlement systems, insofar as these systems fall within the scope of Article 2(a) of the Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
Iz člena 80 Direktive 2014/59/EU izhaja, da kakršno koli zmanjšanje obsega opredelitev zaščitenih dogovorov v skladu s členom 76(2) Direktive 2014/59/EU ne bi smelo vplivati na delovanje sistemov trgovanja, klirinških sistemov in sistemov poravnave, v kolikor ti sistemi spadajo v področje uporabe člena 2(a) Direktive 98/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2].
Resolution authorities should therefore be obliged to protect all types of arrangements referred to in Article 76(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU, which are linked to counterparty's activity as a Central Counterparty (CCP).This includes, but does not need to be limited to, the activity covered by a default fund under Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
Organi za reševanje bi morali biti zato obvezani varovati vse vrste dogovorov iz člena 76(2) Direktive 2014/59/EU, ki so povezani z delovanjem nasprotne stranke kot centralne nasprotne stranke (CNS).
The same applies to assets, rights and liabilities relating to payment or securities settlement systems.
To med drugim vključuje dejavnost jamstvenega sklada v skladu s členom 42 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
As netting arrangements falling in the scope of Directive 98/26/EC are protected in insolvency, they should also be protected, for a reason of consistency, under Article 76 of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Isto velja za sredstva, pravice in obveznosti v zvezi s plačilnimi sistemi in sistemi poravnave vrednostnih papirjev.
However, it is appropriate to extend the scope of the protection under Article 76(2) of that Directive to all arrangements with payment or securities settlement systems and their related activity, where applicable.
Ker so dogovori o pobotu, ki spadajo v področje uporabe Direktive 98/26/ES, zaščiteni v primeru insolventnosti, bi jih bilo treba zaradi doslednosti zaščititi tudi v členu 76 Direktive 2014/59/EU.
This in particular applies to security arrangements and set-off and netting arrangements that are protected under national insolvency law,
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Definitions
V tej uredbi se uporabljajo opredelitve pojmov iz Direktive 2014/59/EU.
For the purpose of this regulation, the definitions contained in Directive 2014/59/EU shall apply.
Poleg tega se uporabljajo naslednje opredelitve pojmov:
The following definitions shall also apply:
„listinjenje“ pomeni listinjenje, kot je opredeljeno členu 4(1)(61) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5];
‘Securitisation’ means securitisation as defined in Article 4(1)(61) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
„pogodbeni pobot“ pomeni pogodbeni pobot, kot je opredeljen v členu 295 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
‘Contractual netting agreements’ means contractual netting agreements as defined in Article 295 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Člen 2
Article 2
Pogoji v zvezi z dogovori o jamstvu, vključno s posli financiranja z vrednostnimi papirji
Conditions relating to security arrangements, including securities financing transactions
Dogovori o jamstvu v skladu s členom 76(2)(a) Direktive 2014/59/EU vključujejo naslednje:
Security arrangements pursuant to Article 76(2)(a) of Directive 2014/59/EU shall include the following:
dogovore, ki vsebujejo jamstva, osebna jamstva in garancije;
arrangements stipulating guarantees, personal securities and warranties;
zastavne pravice in druga realna jamstva;
liens and other real securities interests;
posle posojanja vrednostnih papirjev, ki ne predvidevajo prenosa polnega lastništva nad zavarovanjem s premoženjem in pri katerih ena stranka (posojilodajalec) posodi vrednostne papirje drugi stranki (posojilojemalcu) v zameno za nadomestilo ali plačilo obresti, posojilojemalec pa posojilodajalcu za obdobje trajanja posojila zagotovi zavarovanje s premoženjem.