natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Decision of 4 April 2012 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China, limited to two Chinese exporting producers Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited (2012/185/EU) (OJ L 99, 5.4.2012, p.
Ravni proizvodnje, izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, prodaje, tržnih deležev in produktivnosti bi bile na primer v tem obdobju dejansko višje, če se nesreča ne bi zgodila, saj bi industrija Unije svojim strankam lahko dobavljala svoj natrijev ciklamat namesto uvoženega, ki ga je med avgustom 2011 in majem 2012 očistila in nadalje prodajala.
33).
Majhen obseg prodaje med letoma 2011 in 2012 je treba razlagati v povezavi z nezmožnostjo industrije Unije za proizvajanje in prodajo lastnega natrijevega ciklamata med avgustom 2011 in majem 2012.
Notice on initiation of an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China and Indonesia (OJ C 189, 6.6.2015, p.
V naslednjem obdobju, ko je začela industrija Unije ponovno sama proizvajati natrijev ciklamat, se je izvoz med letoma 2013 in 2014 najprej povečal za 14 indeksnih točk, potem pa se je v obdobju preiskave zmanjšal za 32 indeksnih točk.
2).
Povprečne izvozne cene so se v obravnavanem obdobju zviševale in so bile v obdobju preiskave 8 % višje kot leta 2011.
Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China, limited to Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited (OJ C 264, 12.8.2015, p.
Čeprav so izvozne cene ostale sistematično nižje od povprečnih stroškov proizvodnje na enoto industrije Unije, so bile višje od povprečnih prodajnih cen industrije Unije na trgu Unije in so zato ustvarjale veliko manjše izgube kot prodaja na trgu Unije.
32).
Industrija Unije dejansko ni mogla v celoti izkoristiti ugodnosti uvedbe protidampinških dajatev zoper Indonezijo in druge kitajske izvoznike, vključno z zvišanjem protidampinških dajatev leta 2012.
Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2012 in Case T-158/11 Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union, EU:T:2012:431, paragraph 84.
Agresivna politika oblikovanja cen in posledično povečanje tržnega deleža družb Fang Da od leta 2013 sta povzročila znatno zmanjšanje obsega prodaje in tržnega deleža industrije Unije kljub izvajanju protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz iz LRK in Indonezije.
See footnote 4.
Prvič, opozoriti je treba, da je to, ali dajatev temelji na stopnji dampinga ali stopnji škode, določeno v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve iz člena 9(4) osnovne uredbe (glej uvodno izjavo 182 spodaj), in torej ni odvisno od metode za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1160
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2016/1160
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China and Indonesia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz natrijevega ciklamata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Indonezije na osnovi pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), zlasti člena 11(2) Uredbe,
Following an anti-dumping investigation under Article 5 of the basic Regulation, by Regulation (EC) No 435/2004 [2], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’) and Indonesia.
Svet je po protidampinški preiskavi v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 435/2004 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz natrijevega ciklamata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in Indonezije.
The original measures were subsequently subject to different review investigations [3].
Prvotni ukrepi so se pozneje obravnavali v okviru različnih preiskav v zvezi s pregledom [3].
As a result, the rate of the duty for an individually named Indonesian producer is 0,24 EUR/kg with a residual duty rate of 0,27 EUR/kg imposed on imports of the product concerned produced by other Indonesian producers, whereas the rate of the duty for the PRC ranges between 0 and 0,23 EUR/kg for individually named Chinese producers with a residual duty rate of 0,26 EUR/kg imposed on imports of the product concerned produced by other Chinese producers (‘the measures in force’).
Na podlagi tega stopnja dajatve za poimensko navedenega indonezijskega proizvajalca znaša 0,24 EUR/kg, pri čemer se za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvajajo drugi indonezijski proizvajalci, uvede stopnja preostale dajatve 0,27 EUR/kg, medtem ko stopnja dajatve v LRK znaša med 0 in 0,23 EUR/kg za poimensko navedene kitajske proizvajalce, stopnja preostale dajatve, ki se uvede za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvajajo drugi kitajski proizvajalci, pa 0,26 EUR/kg („veljavni ukrepi“).
The measures in force apply to all imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the PRC and Indonesia, with the exception of imports of sodium cyclamate produced by the Chinese exporting producers Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited.
Veljavni ukrepi se uporabljajo za ves uvoz natrijevega ciklamata s poreklom iz LRK in Indonezije, razen za uvoz natrijevega ciklamata, ki ga proizvajata kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited in Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited.
A zero duty rate was originally determined for these companies, as no dumping was found [4].
Za ti družbi je bila prvotno določena ničelna stopnja dajatve, saj zanju ni bil ugotovljen damping [4].
In line with the WTO Appellate Body report in case Mexico — Definitive Anti-dumping Measures on Beef and Rice (‘the WTO Appellate Body report’), the Chinese exporting producers Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited were not examined in the subsequent reviews of the measures as imposed by Regulation (EC) No 435/2004 and are not subject to the measures in force.
V skladu s poročilom pritožbenega organa STO v zadevi Mehika – dokončni protidampinški ukrepi za goveje meso in riž („poročilo pritožbenega organa STO“) se kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited in Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited nista proučila v okviru poznejših pregledov ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 435/2004, in veljavni ukrepi se v zvezi z njima ne uporabljajo.
Following the publication of a Notice of impending expiry of the anti-dumping measures in force [5], the Commission received on 6 March 2015 a request for the initiation of an expiry review of these measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov [5] 6. marca 2015 prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka teh ukrepov na podlagi člena 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by Productos Aditivos S.A., the sole Union producer of sodium cyclamate, thus representing 100 % of the total Union production.
Zahtevek je vložil Productos Aditivos S.A., ki je edini proizvajalec natrijevega ciklamata v Uniji in zato predstavlja 100 % celotne proizvodnje v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the definitive anti-dumping measures would likely result in the continuation and recurrence of dumping and continuation and recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi iztek veljavnosti dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje in ponovitev dampinga ter škode za industrijo Unije.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 6 June 2015, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6] (the Notice of Initiation), the initiation of an expiry review under Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, in zato 6. junija 2015 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
On 12 August 2015 the Commission also initiated an investigation under Article 5 of the basic Regulation with regard to imports of the same product manufactured and exported to the Union by Fang Da Food Additive (Shenzhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yan Quan) Limited (both companies referred to as ‘Fang Da’) (‘the parallel Article 5 investigation’) [7].
Komisija je 12. avgusta 2015 začela tudi preiskavo v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe v zvezi z uvozom enakega izdelka, ki ga proizvajata ter v Unijo izvažata družbi Fang Da Food Additive (Shenzhen) Limited in Fang Da Food Additive (Yan Quan) Limited (obe družbi se skupaj navajata kot „Fang Da“) („vzporedna preiskava v skladu s členom 5“) [7].
Imports from Fang Da are not subject to this expiry review investigation.
Uvoz družb Fang Da ni zajet v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission invited interested parties to come forward in order to participate in the investigation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj se javijo, če želijo sodelovati v preiskavi.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the complainant, known exporting producers, the authorities of the PRC and Indonesia, known importers, suppliers, users, and traders known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je o začetku preiskave izrecno obvestila pritožnika, znane proizvajalce izvoznike, kitajske in indonezijske organe, znane uvoznike, dobavitelje, uporabnike in trgovce, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter jih pozvala k sodelovanju.
In the Notice of Initiation, in relation to imports from the PRC, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged Indonesia as a market economy third country (‘analogue country’) within the meaning of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v zvezi z uvozom iz LRK v obvestilu o začetku obvestila zainteresirane strani, da namerava uporabiti Indonezijo kot tretjo državo s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“) v smislu člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
However, in view of the available statistical data (see recital (32) below), the Commission also informed the authorities of the United States of America (the ‘US’) about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to provide names and identities of sodium cyclamate producers in the US, if any.
Glede na razpoložljive statistične podatke (glej uvodno izjavo 32 spodaj) je o začetku preiskave obvestila tudi organe Združene države Amerike („ZDA“) ter jih pozvala, naj predložijo imena in identitete proizvajalcev natrijevega ciklamata v ZDA, če obstajajo.
No sodium cyclamate producers in the US were subsequently identified.
Opredeljeni niso bili nobeni proizvajalci natrijevega ciklamata iz ZDA.
There were no indications on the file pointing towards possible production of sodium cyclamate in other third countries.
V dokumentaciji ni nobenih dokazov o morebitni proizvodnji natrijevega ciklamata v drugih tretjih državah.
In its Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample the interested parties in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo morda izbrala vzorec zainteresiranih strani v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In its Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that Productos Aditivos S.A. is the sole Union producer of sodium cyclamate in the Union, thus representing 100 % of the total Union production.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da je Productos Aditivos S.A. edini proizvajalec natrijevega ciklamata v Uniji in zato predstavlja 100 % celotne proizvodnje v Uniji.
Consequently, the sampling was not necessary.
Zato vzorčenje ni bilo potrebno.
To decide whether sampling is necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Nepovezane uvoznike je prosila, naj predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku, da bi se odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec.
Since only one unrelated importer came forward with the requested information, it was not necessary to sample unrelated importers.
Ker je zahtevane informacije predložil le en nepovezan uvoznik, vzorčenje nepovezanih uvoznikov ni bilo potrebno.
Sampling of exporting producers in the PRC and Indonesia
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in Indoneziji
In view of the limited number of known exporting producers in the countries concerned, sampling of exporting producers was not foreseen.
Glede na omejeno število znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v zadevnih državah vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni bilo predvideno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the sole Union producer, all known exporting producers in the PRC and Indonesia, one Union unrelated importer and one Union user, which expressed an interest in the investigation.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike edinemu proizvajalcu Unije, vsem znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK in Indoneziji, enemu nepovezanemu uvozniku Unije in enemu uporabniku Unije, ki so izrazili zanimanje za preiskavo.
A questionnaire reply was received from the sole Union producer and a partial reply from one Union user.
Vprašalnik je izpolnil edini proizvajalec Unije, en uporabnik Unije pa ga je delno izpolnil.
No questionnaire replies were received from unrelated importers in the Union and from exporting producers in the PRC and Indonesia.
Vprašalnika niso izpolnili nepovezani uvozniki v Uniji niti proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK in Indoneziji.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the determination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in nastale škode ter ugotovitev interesa Unije.
Verification visits pursuant to Article 16 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Preveritveni obiski na podlagi člena 16 osnovne uredbe so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Union producer
proizvajalec Unije
Productos Aditivos S.A., Barcelona, Spain.
Productos Aditivos S.A., Barcelona, Španija.
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015 (‘the review investigation period’).
Preiskava verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2014 do 31. marca 2015 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2011 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to maintain the definitive anti-dumping measures in force.
Vse zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bilo predvideno, da se ohranijo veljavni dokončni protidampinški ukrepi.
No party submitted any comments after the disclosure.
Po razkritju ni nobena stran predložila pripomb.
The product concerned is sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China and Indonesia (‘the countries concerned’), currently falling within CN code ex29299000 (TARIC code 2929900010) (‘the product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek je natrijev ciklamat s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Indonezije („zadevni državi“), trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN ex29299000 (oznaka TARIC 2929900010) („zadevni izdelek“).
Sodium cyclamate is a commodity product used as a food additive and is widely used as a sweetener by the food industry, as well as by the producers of low-caloric and dietetic table-top sweeteners.
Natrijev ciklamat je izdelek, ki se uporablja kot živilski aditiv, živilska industrija in proizvajalci nizkokaloričnih in dietetičnih namiznih sladil pa ga splošno uporabljajo kot sladilo.
Sodium cyclamate is a chemically pure substance.
Natrijev ciklamat je kemično čista snov.
However, as is the case for any pure chemical, it may contain a small proportion of impurities in amounts of mg/kg of the product.
Vendar tako kot vsaka čista kemikalija lahko vsebuje majhen delež nečistoč v količinah mg/kg izdelka.
The content of the impurities, determined by the Union legislation, defines the quality of sodium cyclamate.
Vsebnost nečistoč, ki jo določa zakonodaja Unije, opredeljuje kakovost natrijevega ciklamata.
Sodium cyclamate can be found in two different forms: hydrated (HC), with 15 % of moisture; and anhydrous (AC), with a content of up to 1 % of moisture.
Natrijev ciklamat se pojavlja v dveh različnih oblikah: hidriran (HC) s 15 % vlage in brezvodni (AC) z vsebnostjo vlage do 1 %.
These two forms of sodium cyclamate have the same main characteristics and uses; it only varies in degree of sweetness; the HC type is less sweet due to the water content.
Ti obliki natrijevega ciklamata imata enake glavne značilnosti in uporabe.
Prices vary due to the same reason.
Razlikujeta se le po sladkosti, pri čemer je vrsta HC manj sladka zaradi vsebnosti vode.
The AC type is more expensive than the HC form.
Iz istega razloga se razlikujeta tudi ceni.
Both forms should be therefore considered as one product for the purposes of this proceeding.
Natrijev ciklamat v obliki AC je dražji kot v obliki HC.
Like product
Zato bi bilo treba za namene tega postopka obe obliki obravnavati kot en izdelek.
The investigation showed that the following products have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics as well as the same basic uses:
Podobni izdelek
the product concerned;
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo naslednji izdelki enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe:
the product produced and sold by the exporting producers on the domestic market of the PRC and Indonesia;
zadevni izdelek,
the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry.
izdelek, ki ga proizvajalci izvozniki proizvajajo in prodajajo na domačem trgu LRK in Indonezije,
The Commission therefore concluded that those products are like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije.
LIKELIHOOD OF A CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
Komisija je zato sklenila, da so navedeni izdelki podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The PRC
VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
Preliminary remarks
LRK
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was taking place and whether the expiry of existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
Uvodne opombe
Although there were significant imports of the product concerned during the review investigation period, none of the Chinese exporting producers subject to measures cooperated in this investigation.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali je damping prisoten in ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping zaradi izteka veljavnosti obstoječih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
Therefore, the findings in relation to the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping set out below were based on statistical data as well as data contained in the expiry review request.
Čeprav je bil uvoz zadevnega izdelka v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom znaten, nobeden od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, za katere veljajo ukrepi, ni sodeloval v tej preiskavi.
Dumping during the review investigation period
Zato so spodaj navedene ugotovitve glede verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga temeljile na statističnih podatkih in podatkih iz zahtevka za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa.
Analogue country
Damping v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, due care was taken in identifying a market economy third country for establishing prices or constructed value to determine normal value.
Primerljiva država
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged Indonesia as an appropriate analogue country and invited interested parties to comment.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se je z ustrezno skrbnostjo opredelila tretja država s tržnim gospodarstvom za določitev normalne vrednosti na podlagi cen ali računsko določene vrednosti.
No comments were received.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da namerava uporabiti Indonezijo kot primerno primerljivo državo, in jih pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe.
The Commission sought cooperation from producers in Indonesia.
Prejela ni nobenih pripomb.
Letters and relevant questionnaires were sent to all known Indonesian exporting producers.
Komisija je k sodelovanju pozvala proizvajalce iz Indonezije.
One Indonesian exporting producer came forward and provided a very incomplete questionnaire reply.
Dopisi in ustrezni vprašalniki so bili poslani vsem znanim indonezijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
The Commission received no reply to the subsequent letter requesting the company to complete its reply.
Odzval se je en indonezijski proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je predložil zelo nepopolno izpolnjen vprašalnik.
The totality of data received was so incomplete that it could not be used to determine the normal value.
Komisija ni prejela odgovora na naknadni dopis, v katerem je družbo pozvala, naj dopolni svoj odgovor.
As a result, the Indonesian exporting producer could no longer be considered as cooperating.
Skupni prejeti podatki so bili tako nepopolni, da jih ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Consequently, no cooperation from Indonesia could be obtained.
Zato se indonezijski proizvajalec izvoznik ni mogel več obravnavati kot sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik.
According to the information available to the Commission, there is only production of the product concerned in the Union and in the two countries concerned.
Indonezija torej ni zagotovila sodelovanja.
However, Eurostat statistics suggested limited quantities of exports of the product concerned from the United States of America (‘US’) to the Union during the period considered.
Po podatkih, ki so na voljo Komisiji, se zadevni izdelek proizvaja samo v Uniji in dveh zadevnih državah.
As sodium cyclamate is prohibited for use in the US this was probably a matter of misclassification but the Commission nevertheless contacted the US authorities to identify possible producers of the product concerned in the US, if any.
Vendar se je zadevni izdelek glede na statistične podatke Eurostata v obravnavanem obdobju v omejenih količinah izvažal iz Združenih držav Amerike („ZDA“) v Unijo.
No indications of the existence of such producers were subsequently received.
Ker je uporaba natrijevega ciklamata v ZDA prepovedana, je bil to najverjetneje primer napačne razvrstitve.
Consequently, no cooperation was obtained from any potential analogue country producer.
Kljub temu je Komisija stopila v stik z organi ZDA, da bi opredelila morebitne proizvajalce zadevnega izdelka v ZDA.