natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code, the Council adopted on 12 May 2016, on a proposal from the Commission, an Implementing Decision setting out a Recommendation for temporary internal border control in exceptional circumstances putting the overall functioning of the Schengen area at risk [2].
Svet je 12. maja 2016 v skladu s členom 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah in na predlog Komisije sprejel izvedbeni sklep o priporočilu za začasni nadzor na notranjih mejah v izrednih okoliščinah, ki ogrožajo splošno delovanje schengenskega območja [2].
The Council recommended that five Schengen States (Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway) maintain proportionate temporary border control at a limited number of their internal border sections, for a period of six months, in order to address the serious threat to public policy and internal security in these States by the combination of deficiencies in external border control in Greece and the secondary movements of irregular migrants entering via Greece and who may intend to move to other Schengen States.
Svet je petim schengenskim državam (Avstriji, Nemčiji, Danski, Švedski in Norveški) priporočil ohranitev sorazmernega začasnega nadzora na omejenem številu odsekov njihovih notranjih meja za šest mesecev v odziv na resno grožnjo javnemu redu in notranji varnosti, ki jo v teh državah predstavlja kombinacija pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zunanjih meja v Grčiji in sekundarnih gibanj migrantov brez urejenega statusa, ki prek Grčije vstopajo v schengensko območje in se morda nameravajo gibati v druge schengenske države.
This period was prolonged by the Council on a proposal from the Commission for another three months on 11 November 2016.
Svet je 11. novembra 2016 na predlog Komisije ta rok podaljšal za nadaljnje tri mesece.
Under Articles 25 and 29 of the Schengen Borders Code, the initial period recommended by the Council can be further prolonged if the exceptional circumstances persist.
V skladu s členoma 25 in 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah se lahko začetno obdobje, ki ga je priporočil Svet, dodatno podaljša, če so izredne okoliščine še vedno prisotne.
The Recommendation of 11 November 2016 required that the Schengen States concerned report monthly to the Commission on the outcome of the controls carried out and on the assessment concerning the continued necessity of such controls, when applicable.
Priporočilo z dne 11. novembra 2016 določa, da morajo zadevne schengenske države mesečno poročati Komisiji o rezultatih opravljenega nadzora in, kadar je to ustrezno, o oceni nadaljnje potrebe po takem nadzoru.
The Commission received such reports from all the Schengen States concerned.
Komisija je ta poročila prejela od vseh zadevnih schengenskih držav.
The information contained in these reports demonstrates that the controls have remained within the conditions set by the Recommendation.
Informacije v teh poročilih kažejo, da je nadzor ostal v okviru pogojev, določenih v priporočilu.
It also confirms a progressive stabilisation of the situation in these States, with a continuous reduction in the number of persons to whom entry is refused, as well as the number of asylum applications received.
Potrjujejo tudi, da se razmere v teh državah postopoma stabilizirajo, saj se število oseb, ki jim je bil zavrnjen vstop, vztrajno niža, prav tako tudi število prejetih prošenj za azil.
However, despite this progress, the conditions set out in the Roadmap ‘Back to Schengen’ in order to allow lifting all internal border controls and returning to a normally functioning Schengen area are still not entirely fulfilled.
Kljub temu napredku pa pogoji, ki so navedeni v časovnem načrtu „Vrnitev k schengenski ureditvi“, da bi se omogočila odprava nadzora na notranjih mejah in ponovno uvedlo normalno delovanje schengenskega območja, še vedno niso v celoti izpolnjeni.
Moreover, in spite of the ongoing progress and the significant improvement related to the external border management that Greece has made in 2016, an important number of irregular migrants still remains in Greece.
V Grčiji tudi navzlic stalnemu napredku in precej boljšemu upravljanju zunanjih meja v tej državi v letu 2016 ostaja veliko število migrantov brez urejenega statusa.
Based on trends observed in the past, the Member States most affected by the secondary movements of irregular migrants coming from Greece remain exposed to the risk related to their irregular movements.
Na podlagi trendov, zabeleženih v preteklosti, so države članice, ki so najbolj prizadete zaradi sekundarnih gibanj migrantov brez urejenega statusa, ki prihajajo iz Grčije, še naprej izpostavljene tveganju nezakonitih gibanj.
In its Communication ‘Back to Schengen — A Roadmap’, the Commission identified the different policies to be put in place to return to a fully functioning Schengen Area.
Komisija je v sporočilu „Vrnitev k schengenski ureditvi – časovni načrt“ opredelila različne politike, ki jih je treba uvesti za vrnitev k popolnoma delujočemu schengenskemu območju.
The European Border and Coast Guard Agency is now swiftly becoming operational, allowing it to provide assistance to Greece at the Northern Greek external border as of February 2017.
Evropska agencija za mejno in obalno stražo je zdaj hitro začela delovati, kar ji omogoča, da bo od februarja 2017 naprej zagotavljala pomoč Grčiji na severni grški zunanji meji.
Another element identified in the Back to Schengen Roadmap is the implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement.
Drug element iz časovnega načrta „Vrnitev k schengenski ureditvi“ je izvajanje izjave EU in Turčije.
The fourth progress report [3] confirms the trend of a steady delivery of results, albeit in the face of many challenges.
Četrto poročilo o napredku [3] potrjuje trend stalnega doseganja rezultatov, čeprav v luči številnih izzivov.
This implementation nevertheless needs to be constantly monitored.
Kljub temu je treba to izvajanje nenehno spremljati.
The same applies to the cooperation agreed upon in the Statement of the Western Balkans Route Leaders meeting.
Enako velja tudi za sodelovanje, dogovorjeno v izjavi, ki je bila sprejeta na srečanju voditeljev držav vzdolž zahodnobalkanske poti.
The exceptional circumstances constituting a serious threat to public policy and internal security and putting at risk the overall functioning of the Schengen area therefore still persist.
Izredne okoliščine, ki pomenijo resno grožnjo javnemu redu in notranji varnosti ter ogrožajo splošno delovanje schengenskega območja, zato še vedno obstajajo.
In light of the facts above, it appears therefore justified, as a last resort measure, to allow a further prolongation of the temporary border controls at the internal borders concerned by the Schengen States currently carrying out such controls, namely Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and the associated country Norway, in accordance with Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenih dejstev se zato zdi upravičeno, da se schengenskim državam, ki trenutno izvajajo začasni nadzor na notranjih mejah, in sicer Avstriji, Nemčiji, Danski, Švedski in pridruženi državi Norveški, kot skrajni ukrep v skladu s členom 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah dovoli nadaljnje podaljšanje takega nadzora.
Based on the factual indicators available at this stage, this prolongation should not exceed three months as from the date of adoption of the present Implementing Decision.
Dejanski, trenutno razpoložljivi kazalniki kažejo, da to podaljšanje ne bi smelo presegati treh mesecev od datuma sprejetja tega izvedbenega sklepa.
The Member States that decide to continue carrying out internal border control under the present Implementing Decision should notify the other Member States, the European Parliament and the Commission accordingly.
Države članice, ki bi se odločile za nadaljevanje izvajanja nadzora na notranjih mejah na podlagi tega izvedbenega sklepa, bi morale o tem uradno obvestiti druge države članice, Evropski parlament in Komisijo.
Before opting for such controls, the Member States concerned should examine whether other measures alternative to border controls could not be used to effectively remedy the identified threat, such as the exercise of police powers in a manner compatible with Article 23 of the Schengen Borders Code, and decide to reintroduce border controls at the internal borders concerned only as a measure of last resort, when such less restrictive measures for cross-border traffic cannot sufficiently address the threats identified.
Preden se zadevne države članice odločijo za tak nadzor, bi morale preučiti, ali bi lahko za učinkovito odpravo ugotovljene grožnje uporabile alternativne ukrepe nadzoru meje, na primer izvajanje policijskih pooblastil na način, ki je združljiv s členom 23 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah, in se za ponovno uvedbo nadzora na zadevnih notranjih mejah odločiti le v skrajnem primeru, kadar ugotovljenih groženj ni mogoče ustrezno obravnavati z ukrepi, ki manj omejujejo čezmejni promet.
The Member States concerned should inform of the outcome of this reflection and the reasons for opting for border controls in their notifications.
Zadevne države članice bi morale v svojih uradnih obvestilih navesti izid tega premisleka in razloge za odločitev za nadzor meje.
The controls under the present Implementing Decision should continue to be carried out only to the necessary extent, limited in their intensity to the absolute minimum necessary and adjusted to the circumstances.
Nadzor na podlagi tega izvedbenega sklepa bi bilo treba še naprej izvajati le, kolikor je to potrebno, intenzivnost nadzora pa omejiti na nujno potreben minimum in prilagoditi okoliščinam.
Accordingly, it can be envisaged that any further decrease of the flow should lead to suspending the controls at given border sections.
V skladu s tem se lahko predvideva, da bi moralo vsako nadaljnje zmanjšanje pritoka privesti do opustitve nadzora na določenih mejnih odsekih.
Only targeted controls, based on constantly updated risk analysis and intelligence, should be carried out, in order to optimise the benefit of the controls and limit their negative effects on free movement.
Izvajati bi bilo treba le ciljno usmerjen nadzor, ki temelji na redno posodobljenih analizi tveganja in obveščevalnih podatkih, da bi se optimizirale koristi nadzora in omejili njegovi negativni učinki na prosto gibanje oseb.
The Schengen States affected by these controls at the relevant border sections should be admitted to regularly express their views on their necessity; the Schengen State having decided to reintroduce such controls should take these views into account when examining and reviewing the necessity of such checks, with the objective of progressively reducing them.
Schengenskim državam, ki jih prizadene ta nadzor na ustreznih mejnih odsekih, bi moralo biti omogočeno, da redno izražajo svoja mnenja o nujnosti nadzora; schengenska država, ki se je odločila za ponovno uvedbo takšnega nadzora, bi morala ta mnenja upoštevati pri preučevanju in pregledovanju nujnosti takšnega nadzora s ciljem, da se nadzor postopoma zmanjšuje.
At the end of each month of implementation of the present Implementing Decision, a complete report on the results of the checks carried out should be promptly sent to the Commission and the Council, together with an assessment of their continuous necessity when applicable.
Ob koncu vsakega meseca izvajanja tega izvedbenega sklepa bi bilo treba Komisiji in Svetu takoj poslati popolno poročilo o rezultatih opravljenih kontrol, skupaj z oceno nadaljnje potrebe po takih kontrolah, kadar je to ustrezno.
The Council takes note that the Commission has announced that it will continue working with the Schengen States concerned to gradually phase out temporary internal border controls with the objective of returning to a normal functioning of the Schengen area as soon as possible.
Svet je seznanjen s tem, da je Komisija napovedala, da bo še naprej sodelovala z zadevnimi schengenskimi državami, da bi se začasni nadzor na notranjih mejah postopno prenehal izvajati s ciljem, da se čim prej ponovno uvede normalno delovanje schengenskega območja.
The Council also takes note that the Commission has announced that it will closely monitor the application of this Implementing Decision,
Svet je seznanjen tudi s tem, da je Komisija napovedala, da bo pozorno spremljala izvajanje tega izvedbenega sklepa –
Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway to prolong proportionate, temporary border controls for a maximum period of three months, starting from 11 February 2017, at the following internal borders:
Avstrija, Nemčija, Danska, Švedska in Norveška naj podaljšajo sorazmerni začasni nadzor meje za obdobje največ treh mesecev z začetkom 11. februarja 2017 na naslednjih notranjih mejah:
Germany at the German-Austrian land border,
Nemčija na nemško-avstrijski kopenski meji,
Before deciding on further prolongation of such controls based on this Recommendation, the Member States concerned should exchange views with the relevant Member State(s) with a view to ensuring that internal border controls are carried out only where it is considered necessary and proportionate.
Preden se zadevne države članice odločijo za nadaljnje podaljšanje takšnega nadzora na podlagi tega priporočila, bi morale z ustreznimi državami članicami izmenjati mnenja, da se zagotovi izvajanje nadzora na notranjih mejah le, kadar je takšen ukrep nujen in sorazmeren.
Border control should remain targeted, based on constantly updated risk analysis and intelligence, and limited in scope, frequency, location and time, to what is strictly necessary to respond to the serious threat and to safeguard public policy and internal security.
Nadzor meje bi moral na podlagi redno posodobljene analize tveganja in obveščevalnih podatkov ostati ciljno usmerjen ter po obsegu, pogostosti, lokaciji in času omejen na to, kar je nujno potrebno za odziv na resno grožnjo ter za zaščito javnega reda in notranje varnosti.
The Member State that carries out internal border control pursuant to the present Implementing Decision should review weekly the necessity, frequency, location and time of controls, adjust the intensity of the controls to the level of the threat addressed, phasing them out wherever appropriate, and report promptly to the Commission and the Council every month.
Država članica, ki izvaja nadzor na notranjih mejah na podlagi tega izvedbenega sklepa, bi morala vsak teden preverjati nujnost, pogostost, lokacijo in čas nadzora, intenzivnost nadzora prilagajati stopnji obravnavane grožnje, ga prenehati izvajati, kadar koli je to primerno, in vsak mesec takoj poročati Komisiji in Svetu.
OJ L 151, 8.6.2016, p. 8.
UL L 151, 8.6.2016, str. 8.
Fourth Report on the Progress made in the implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement (COM(2016) 792).
Četrto poročilo o napredku pri izvajanju izjave EU in Turčije (COM(2016) 792).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/247
of 9 February 2017
z dne 9. februarja 2017
on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
o zaščitnih ukrepih zaradi izbruhov visokopatogene aviarne influence v nekaterih državah članicah
(notified under document C(2017) 1044)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2017) 1044)
Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in birds.
Aviarna influenca je kužna virusna bolezen pri pticah.
Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry and other captive birds cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence.
Okužba domače perutnine in drugih ptic v ujetništvu z virusi aviarne influence povzroča dve glavni obliki navedene bolezni, ki se ločita po virulenci.
The low pathogenic form generally only causes mild symptoms, while the highly pathogenic form results in very high mortality rates in most species of birds.
Nizkopatogena oblika na splošno povzroča samo blage simptome, medtem ko visokopatogena oblika povzroča visoko umrljivost pri večini vrst ptic.
In the event of an outbreak of avian influenza in a Member State, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
Pri izbruhu aviarne influence v državi članici obstaja tveganje, da se povzročitelj bolezni razširi na druga gospodarstva, kjer gojijo perutnino ali druge ptice v ujetništvu.
This regionalisation is applied in particular to preserve the health status of birds in the remainder of the territory of the Member State by preventing the introduction of the pathogenic agent and ensuring the early detection of the disease.
Ta regionalizacija se uporablja zlasti za ohranitev zdravstvenega statusa ptic na preostalem ozemlju države članice s preprečevanjem vnosa patogenega organizma in zagotavljanjem zgodnjega odkrivanja bolezni.
Since early November 2016, 16 Member States (the ‘concerned Member States’), namely Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Greece, France, Croatia, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden and the United Kingdom, have notified the Commission of outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in holdings on their territory where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
Od začetka novembra 2016 je šestnajst držav članic, in sicer Bolgarija, Češka, Danska, Nemčija, Grčija, Francija, Hrvaška, Italija, Madžarska, Nizozemska, Avstrija, Poljska, Romunija, Slovaška, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo, (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „zadevne države članice“) obvestilo Komisijo o izbruhih visokopatogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N8 na gospodarstvih na svojem ozemlju, kjer gojijo perutnino ali druge ptice v ujetništvu.
The highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of subtype H5N8 has since the end of October 2016 been detected in large numbers of wild birds, mainly of migratory bird species in the Member States listed above and in addition in Ireland, Spain, Portugal and Slovenia.
Virus visokopatogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N8 je bil od konca oktobra 2016 odkrit pri številnih divjih pticah, predvsem pri vrstah ptic selivk v zgoraj navedenih državah članicah, poleg tega pa še na Irskem, v Španiji, na Portugalskem in v Sloveniji.
In most Member States, the causative virus was first found in wild birds, before it was detected in holdings that keep poultry or other captive birds.
V večini držav članic je bil povzročitelj najprej odkrit pri divjih pticah, nato pa na gospodarstvih, kjer gojijo perutnino ali druge ptice v ujetništvu.
Also neighbouring third countries such as the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, Switzerland, the Russian Federation and Ukraine have identified the highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of subtype H5N8 on their territories in wild birds or in holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
Tudi sosednje tretje države, kot so nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija, Srbija, Švica, Ruska federacija in Ukrajina, so na svojih ozemljih pri divjih pticah ali na gospodarstvih, kjer gojijo perutnino ali druge ptice v ujetništvu, odkrile virus visokopatogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N8.
In response to the outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in Denmark, Germany, France, Hungary, the Netherlands, Austria and Sweden the Commission adopted several Commission Implementing Decisions on protection measures addressed to these Member States.
V odziv na izbruhe visokopatogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N8 na gospodarstvih na Danskem, v Nemčiji, Franciji, na Madžarskem, Nizozemskem, v Avstriji in na Švedskem je Komisija sprejela več izvedbenih sklepov Komisije o zaščitnih ukrepih in jih naslovila na te države članice.
For reasons of clarity and in order to keep the Member States, third countries and stakeholders up-to-date on the evolution of the epidemiological situation, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2122 [4] was adopted to list in one Union act the protection and surveillance zones established by the competent authority of the concerned Member States following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in holdings on their territory in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC.
Zaradi jasnosti in da bi bile države članice, tretje države in zainteresirane strani obveščene o razvoju epidemioloških razmer, je bil sprejet Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2122 [4], da bi bila v enem aktu Unije našteta vsa okužena in ogrožena območja, ki so jih pristojni organi zadevnih držav članic vzpostavili po izbruhih visokopatogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N8 na gospodarstvih na svojih ozemljih v skladu z Direktivo 2005/94/ES.
The concerned Member States are listed in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
Zadevne države članice so navedene v Prilogi k navedenemu izvedbenemu sklepu.
Since the adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2122 the epidemic has further evolved and extended its geographical range in particular due to the ongoing seasonal movements of wild migratory birds and the occasional spillover to holdings where poultry and other captive birds are kept.
Od sprejetja Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2016/2122 se je epidemija nadalje razvila in se geografsko razširila zlasti zaradi potekajočih sezonskih premikov divjih ptic selivk in občasnega zunanjega učinka na gospodarstva, kjer gojijo perutnino in druge ptice v ujetništvu.
Subsequent virus spread between holdings has also occurred in certain areas with a high density of holdings where poultry cannot be sufficiently protected against contacts with wild birds.
Do nadaljnjega širjenja virusa med gospodarstvi je prišlo tudi na nekaterih območjih z visoko gostoto gospodarstev, na katerih perutnina ne more biti zadostno zaščitena pred stiki z divjimi pticami.
Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2122 was subsequently amended by Commission Implementing Decisions (EU) 2016/2219 [5], (EU) 2016/2279 [6], (EU) 2016/2367 [7], (EU) 2017/14 [8], (EU) 2017/116 [9] and (EU) 2017/155 [10] following further outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, France, Croatia, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
Po nadaljnjih izbruhih visokopatogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N8 v Bolgariji, na Češkem, v Nemčiji, Grčiji, Franciji, na Hrvaškem, v Italiji, na Madžarskem, Nizozemskem, v Avstriji, na Poljskem, v Romuniji, na Slovaškem, Švedskem in v Združenem kraljestvu je bil Izvedbeni sklep (EU) 2016/2122 spremenjen z izvedbenimi sklepi Komisije (EU) 2016/2219 [5], (EU) 2016/2279 [6], (EU) 2016/2367 [7], (EU) 2017/14 [8], (EU) 2017/116 [9] in (EU) 2017/155 [10].
Since the adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/155, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, France, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden and the United Kingdom have reported further outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in poultry and have taken the necessary measures required in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones around outbreaks.
Od sprejetja Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2017/155 so Bolgarija, Češka, Nemčija, Grčija, Francija, Italija, Madžarska, Poljska, Romunija, Slovaška, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo poročali o nadaljnjih izbruhih visokopatogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N8 pri perutnini in sprejeli potrebne ukrepe, ki jih zahteva Direktiva 2005/94/ES, vključno z vzpostavitvijo okuženih in ogroženih območij okoli izbruhov.
In all cases, the Commission examined the measures taken by the concerned Member States in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC and satisfied itself that the boundaries of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authorities of the concerned Member States, were at a sufficient distance to any holding where an outbreak had been confirmed.
Komisija je v vseh primerih v skladu z Direktivo 2005/94/ES proučila ukrepe, ki so jih sprejele zadevne države članice, in presodila, da so meje okuženih in ogroženih območij, ki so jih določili pristojni organi zadevnih držav članic, dovolj oddaljene od vsakega gospodarstva, na katerem je bil potrjen izbruh.