natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In cases which fall outside its scope of competence, the EPPO should inform the competent national authorities of any facts of which it becomes aware, and which might constitute a criminal offence, for example false testimony.
EJT lahko informacije prejema ali zbira tudi iz drugih virov, na primer od fizičnih oseb.
Institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, as well as national authorities, should provide without delay any information to the EPPO about offences in respect of which it could exercise its competence.
Z mehanizmom preverjanja znotraj EJT bi bilo treba oceniti, ali so na podlagi prejetih informacij izpolnjeni pogoji za stvarno, krajevno in osebno pristojnost EJT.
The EPPO may also receive or gather information from other sources, such as private parties.
EJT lahko na nove informacije opozorijo žvižgači, kar mu pomaga pri preiskovanju, pregonu in obtožbi storilcev kaznivih dejanj, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije.
A verification mechanism in the EPPO should aim to assess whether, on the basis of the information received, the conditions for material, territorial and personal competence of the EPPO are fulfilled.
Vendar lahko strah pred povračilnimi ukrepi odvrača od prijavljanja nepravilnosti.
Whistle-blowers may bring new information to the attention of the EPPO thereby assisting it in its work to investigate, prosecute and bring to judgment perpetrators of offences affecting the Union’s financial interests.
Da bi olajšali odkrivanje kaznivih dejanj, ki sodijo v pristojnost EJT, se države članice spodbuja, da v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom zagotovijo učinkovite postopke, ki omogočajo poročanje o morebitnih kaznivih dejanjih, ki sodijo v pristojnost EJT, in zagotovijo zaščito oseb, ki prijavijo taka kazniva dejanja, pred povračilnimi ukrepi, in zlasti pred negativnimi ali diskriminatornimi ukrepi na delovnem mestu.
However, whistleblowing may be deterred by fear of retaliation.
EJT bi moralo po potrebi oblikovati svoje notranje predpise.
With a view to facilitating the detection of offences that fall within the competence of the EPPO, Member States are encouraged to provide, in accordance with their national law, effective procedures to enable reporting of possible offences that fall within the competence of the EPPO and to ensure protection of the persons who report such offences from retaliation, and in particular from adverse or discriminatory employment actions.
Da bi nacionalni organi držav članic ter vse institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Unije v celoti izpolnjevali svojo obveznost obveščanja EJT o ugotovljenih sumih kaznivih dejanj, ki sodijo v njegovo pristojnost, bi morali uporabljati veljavne postopke poročanja in imeti vzpostavljene učinkovite mehanizme za predhodno oceno prijav domnevnih kaznivih dejanj.
The EPPO should develop its own internal rules if necessary.
Institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Unije lahko v ta namen uporabijo Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (v nadaljnjem besedilu: OLAF).
In order to comply fully with their obligation to inform the EPPO where a suspicion of an offence within its competence is identified, the national authorities of the Member States as well as all institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union should follow the existing reporting procedures and have in place efficient mechanisms for a preliminary evaluation of allegations reported to them.
Organi držav članic bi morali vzpostaviti sistem, ki zagotavlja, da se informacije čim prej sporočajo EJT.
The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union may make use of the European Anti-Fraud Office (‘OLAF’) to that end.
Državam članicam je prepuščeno, da se odločijo, ali bodo vzpostavile neposreden ali centraliziran sistem.
Member States’ authorities should set up a system that ensures that information is reported to the EPPO as soon as possible.
Spoštovanje navedene obveznosti poročanja je bistveno za uspešno delovanje EJT in bi ga bilo treba razlagati široko ter tako zagotoviti, da nacionalni organi poročajo o primerih, kjer ocena nekaterih meril ni takoj mogoča (na primer raven škode ali sankcija, ki se uporabi).
It is up to the Member States to decide whether to set up a direct or centralised system.
EJT bi moralo imeti tudi možnost, da za vsak primer posebej zaprosi organe držav članic za informacije o drugih kaznivih dejanjih, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije.
Compliance with that reporting obligation is essential for the EPPO’s good functioning and should be interpreted broadly to ensure that national authorities report cases where the assessment of some criteria is not immediately possible (for example the level of damage or the applicable penalty).
To ne bi smelo pomeniti, da lahko EJT od organov držav članic zahteva sistematične ali periodične informacije o lažjih kaznivih dejanjih.
The EPPO should also be able to request information from the Member States’ authorities on a case-by-case basis about other offences affecting the Union’s financial interests.
Zaradi učinkovitega s preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, in v skladu z načelom ne bis in idem je v določenih primerih lahko potrebno razširiti preiskavo na druga kazniva dejanja po nacionalnem pravu, kadar so ta neločljivo povezana s kaznivimi dejanji, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije.
This should not be considered as a possibility for the EPPO to request systematic or periodic information from Member States’ authorities concerning minor offences.
Pojem „neločljivo povezana kazniva dejanja“ bi bilo treba razumeti glede na zadevno sodno prakso, ki kot ustrezno merilo za uporabo načela ne bis in idem ohranja istovetnost materialnih dejstev (ali dejstev, ki so v bistvu enaka), razumljeno v smislu obstoja skupine konkretnih okoliščin, ki so neločljivo povezane v času in prostoru.
The efficient investigation of offences affecting the financial interests of the Union and the principle of ne bis in idem may require, in certain cases, an extension of the investigation to other offences under national law, where these are inextricably linked to an offence affecting the financial interests of the Union.
EJT bi moralo imeti pravico do izvrševanja pristojnosti, kadar so kazniva dejanja neločljivo povezana in kaznivo dejanje, ki škodi finančnim interesom Unije, med njimi prevladuje, in sicer v smislu teže zadevnega kaznivega dejanja kot jo odraža najvišja sankcija, ki se lahko izreče.
The notion of ‘inextricably linked offences’ should be considered in light of the relevant case-law which, for the application of the ne bis in idem principle, retains as a relevant criterion the identity of the material facts (or facts which are substantially the same), understood in the sense of the existence of a set of concrete circumstances which are inextricably linked together in time and space.
Vendar bi EJT moralo imeti pravico do izvrševanja pristojnosti tudi v primeru neločljivo povezanih kaznivih dejanj, kadar kaznivo dejanje, ki škodi finančnim interesom Unije, ni prevladujoče v smislu stopnje sankcije, temveč se neločljivo povezano drugo kaznivo dejanje šteje kot pomožno po svoji naravi, saj je zgolj prispevalo k storitvi kaznivega dejanja, ki škodi finančnim interesom Unije, zlasti kadar je bil glavni namen takega drugega kaznivega dejanja ustvariti pogoje za izvršitev kaznivega dejanja, ki škodi finančnim interesom Unije, kot je na primer kaznivo dejanje, namenjeno izključno zagotavljanju materialnih ali pravnih sredstev za izvršitev kaznivega dejanja, ki škodi finančnim interesom Unije, ali ki zagotavlja dobiček ali korist od takšnega dejanja.
The EPPO should have the right to exercise competence, where offences are inextricably linked and the offence affecting the Union’s financial interests is preponderant, in terms of the seriousness of the offence concerned, as reflected in the maximum sanctions that could be imposed.
Pojem kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s sodelovanjem v hudodelski združbi, bi moral biti opredeljen v nacionalnem pravu v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2008/841/PNZ [3] in bi lahko na primer vključeval članstvo v takšni hudodelski združbi ali njeno organizacijo in vodenje.
However, the EPPO should also have the right to exercise competence in the case of inextricably linked offences where the offence affecting the financial interests of the Union is not preponderant in terms of sanctions levels, but where the inextricably linked other offence is deemed to be ancillary in nature because it is merely instrumental to the offence affecting the financial interests of the Union, in particular where such other offence has been committed for the main purpose of creating the conditions to commit the offence affecting the financial interests of the Union, such as an offence strictly aimed at ensuring the material or legal means to commit the offence affecting the financial interests of the Union, or to ensure the profit or product thereof.
Pristojnost EJT v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, bi praviloma morala imeti prednost pred nacionalnimi zahtevami glede pristojnosti, da se zagotovita skladnost ter vodenje preiskav in pregona na ravni Unije.
The notion of offences relating to participation in a criminal organisation should be subject to the definition provided for in national law in accordance with Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA [3], and may cover, for example, membership in, or the organisation and leadership of, such a criminal organisation.
Dokler EJT ne odloči, ali bo izvedlo preiskavo, bi se morali organi držav članic vzdržati ukrepanja v zvezi z navedenimi kaznivimi dejanji, razen če so potrebni nujni ukrepi.
The competence of the EPPO regarding offences affecting the financial interests of the Union should, as a general rule, take priority over national claims of competence so that it can ensure consistency and provide steering of investigations and prosecutions at Union level.
Za določeno zadevo bi se med drugim moralo šteti, da ima posledice na ravni Unije, če je kaznivo dejanje transnacionalne narave in obsega, če tako kaznivo dejanje vključuje hudodelsko združbo ali če bi posebna vrsta kaznivega dejanja lahko resno ogrožala finančne interese Unije ali dobro ime institucij Unije in zaupanje državljanov Unije.
With regard to those offences the authorities of Member States should refrain from acting, unless urgent measures are required, until the EPPO has decided whether to conduct an investigation.
Kadar EJT v posameznem primeru ne more izvrševati svojih pristojnosti, ker obstaja razlog za domnevo, da škoda, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena finančnim interesom Unije, ne presega škode, ki je bila ali bi lahko bila povzročena drugi žrtvi, bi moralo EJT kljub temu imeti možnost izvrševati svojo pristojnost, če se izkaže, da je bolje, če preiskavo ali pregon izvede EJT in ne organi zadevne države ali zadevnih držav članic.
A particular case should be considered to have repercussions at Union level, inter alia, where a criminal offence has a transnational nature and scale, where such an offence involves a criminal organisation, or where the specific type of offence could pose a serious threat to the Union’s financial interests or the Union institutions’ credit and Union citizens’ confidence.
Da je bolje, če preiskavo ali pregon izvede EJT, bi se lahko izkazalo med drugim, kadar bi bilo učinkoviteje, da bi zadevno kaznivo dejanje zaradi njegove transnacionalne narave in obsega preiskoval in preganjal EJT, kadar tako kaznivo dejanje vključuje hudodelsko združbo ali kadar bi posebna vrsta kaznivega dejanja lahko resno ogrožala finančne interese Unije ali dobro ime institucij Unije in zaupanje državljanov Unije.
Where the EPPO cannot exercise its competence in a particular case because there is reason to assume that the damage caused, or likely to be caused, to the Union’s financial interests does not exceed the damage caused, or likely to be caused, to another victim, the EPPO should nevertheless be able to exercise its competence provided that it would be better placed to investigate or prosecute than the authorities of the respective Member State(s).
V takem primeru bi EJT moralo imeti možnost izvrševanja svoje pristojnosti ob soglasju pristojnih nacionalnih organov držav(e) članic(e), kjer je bila povzročena škoda taki drugi žrtvi ali žrtvam.
The EPPO could appear to be better placed, inter alia, where it would be more effective to let the EPPO investigate and prosecute the respective criminal offence due to its transnational nature and scale, where the offence involves a criminal organisation, or where a specific type of offence could be a serious threat to the Union’s financial interests or the Union institutions’ credit and Union citizens’ confidence.
Kadar pravosodni organ ali organ pregona države članice sproži preiskavo kaznivega dejanja in meni, da EJT ne bi moglo izvrševati svoje pristojnost, bi moral o tem obvestiti EJT, da bi to lahko ocenilo, ali bi moralo izvrševati pristojnost.
In such a case the EPPO should be able to exercise its competence with the consent given by the competent national authorities of the Member State(s) where damage to such other victim(s) occurred.
V primeru sporov o izvrševanju pristojnosti bi morali dodelitev pristojnosti določiti nacionalni pristojni organi.
When a judicial or law enforcement authority of a Member State initiates an investigation in respect of a criminal offence and considers that the EPPO could not exercise its competence, it should inform the EPPO thereof, in order to allow the latter to assess whether it should exercise competence.
Pojem pristojnih nacionalnih organov bi bilo treba razumeti kot vsakršne pravosodne organe, ki so v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pristojni za odločanje o dodelitvi pristojnosti.
In the case of disagreement over the questions of exercise of competence, the competent national authorities should decide on the attribution of competence.
Ker bi moralo EJT pregon izvajati pred nacionalnimi sodišči, bi morala biti njegova pristojnost opredeljena glede na kazensko pravo držav članic, ki določa kazniva dejanja ali opustitve dejanj, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, in določa ustrezne sankcije z izvajanjem ustreznega prava Unije, zlasti Direktive (EU) 2017/1371, v nacionalnih pravnih sistemih.
The notion of competent national authorities should be understood as any judicial authorities which have competence to decide on the attribution of competence in accordance with national law.
EJT bi moralo izvrševati pristojnosti čim širše, tako da lahko njegove preiskave in pregon zajemajo tudi kazniva dejanja, storjena zunaj ozemlja držav članic.
As the EPPO should bring prosecutions before national courts, its competence should be defined by reference to the criminal law of the Member States that criminalises acts or omissions affecting the Union’s financial interests and determines the applicable penalties by implementing the relevant Union legislation, in particular Directive (EU) 2017/1371, in national legal systems.
Preiskave in pregon, ki jih izvaja EJT, bi morale temeljiti na načelih sorazmernosti, nepristranskosti in pravičnosti do osumljenca ali obdolženca.
The EPPO should exercise its competence as broadly as possible so that its investigations and prosecutions may extend to offences committed outside the territory of the Member States.
To vključuje obveznost, da se po uradni dolžnosti ali na zahtevo obrambe poskušajo pridobiti vse vrste dokazov, tako obremenilni kot razbremenilni.
The investigations and prosecutions of the EPPO should be guided by the principles of proportionality, impartiality and fairness towards the suspect or accused person.
Za zagotavljanje pravne varnosti in za učinkovito preprečevanje kaznivih dejanj, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, bi morale dejavnosti preiskav in pregona, ki jih izvaja EJT, upoštevati načelo zakonitosti, pri čemer EJT dosledno uporablja pravila iz te uredbe, zlasti v zvezi s pristojnostjo in njenim izvajanjem, začetkom preiskav, zaključkom preiskav, odstopom zadeve, opustitvijo zadeve in poenostavljenimi postopki pregona.
This includes the obligation to seek all types of evidence, inculpatory as well as exculpatory, either motu proprio or at the request of the defence.
Da se kar najbolje zaščitijo pravice obtoženca, bi morala proti osumljencu ali obdolžencu teči le ena preiskava ali pregon, ki ga izvaja EJT.
In order to ensure legal certainty and to effectively combat offences affecting the Union’s financial interests, the investigation and prosecution activities of the EPPO should be guided by the legality principle, whereby the EPPO applies strictly the rules laid down in this Regulation relating in particular to competence and its exercise, the initiation of investigations, the termination of investigations, the referral of a case, the dismissal of the case and simplified prosecution procedures.
Če je kaznivo dejanje storilo več oseb, bi moralo EJT načeloma začeti le eno zadevo in preiskave za vse osumljence ali obdolžence izvajati skupaj.
In order to best safeguard the rights of the defendant, in principle a suspect or accused person should only face one investigation or prosecution by the EPPO.
Če je preiskave v zvezi z istim kaznivim dejanjem začelo več evropskih delegiranih tožilcev, bi moral stalni senat takšne preiskave, kjer je ustrezno, združiti.
Where an offence has been committed by several persons, the EPPO should in principle initiate only one case and conduct investigations in respect of all suspect or accused persons jointly.
Stalni senat lahko odloči, da ne bo združil takih postopkov, ali odloči naknadno razdružitev takšnih postopkov, če je to v interesu učinkovitosti preiskav, npr. če bi se postopek zoper enega osumljenca ali obdolženca lahko zaključil v zgodnejši fazi, medtem ko bi bilo treba še nadaljevati postopke zoper druge osumljence ali obdolžence, ali če bi razdružitev zadeve lahko skrajšala pridržanje enega od osumljencev v predkazenskem postopku.
Where several European Delegated Prosecutors have opened investigations in respect of the same criminal offence, the Permanent Chamber should where appropriate merge such investigations.
Če so za zadeve, ki bi jih bilo treba združiti, zadolženi različni stalni senati, bi moral ustrezno pristojnost in postopek določiti poslovnik EJT.
The Permanent Chamber may decide not to merge such proceedings or decide to subsequently split such proceedings if this is in the interest of the efficiency of investigations, for example if proceedings against one suspect or accused person could be terminated at an earlier stage, whereas proceedings against other suspect or accused persons would still have to be continued, or if splitting the case could shorten the period of pre-trial detention of one of the suspects.
Če se stalni senat odloči za razdružitev zadeve, bi moral ohraniti pristojnost za zadeve, ki iz nje izhajajo.
Where different Permanent Chambers are in charge of the cases to be merged, the internal rules of procedure of the EPPO should determine the appropriate competence and procedure.
EJT bi se moralo opirati na nacionalne organe, vključno s policijskimi organi, zlasti pri izvajanju prisilnih ukrepov.
Where the Permanent Chamber decides to split a case, its competence for the resulting cases should be maintained.
V skladu z načelom lojalnega sodelovanja bi morali vsi nacionalni organi in zadevni organi Unije, vključno z Eurojustom, Europolom in OLAF, dejavno podpirati preiskave in pregon, ki jih izvaja EJT, ter z njim sodelovati, in sicer od trenutka, ko se domnevno kaznivo dejanje sporoči EJT, do trenutka, ko se to odloči za pregon ali kako drugače zaključi zadevo.
The EPPO should rely on national authorities, including police authorities, in particular for the execution of coercive measures.
Za učinkovite preiskave in pregon kaznivih dejanj, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije, je bistveno, da lahko EJT zbira dokaze z uporabo vsaj najmanjšega nabora preiskovalnih ukrepov, pri čemer se upošteva načelo sorazmernosti.
Under the principle of sincere cooperation, all national authorities and the relevant bodies of the Union, including Eurojust, Europol and OLAF, should actively support the investigations and prosecutions of the EPPO, as well as cooperate with it, from the moment a suspected offence is reported to the EPPO until the moment it determines whether to prosecute or otherwise dispose of the case.
Ti ukrepi bi morali biti na voljo v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, ki sodijo v pristojnost EJT, vsaj kadar se kaznujejo z najvišjo predpisano sankcijo najmanj štirih let zapora, za namene njegovih preiskav in pregona, vendar se zanje lahko uporabljajo omejitve v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
It is essential for the effective investigation and prosecution of offences affecting the Union’s financial interests that the EPPO be able to gather evidence by using at least a minimum set of investigation measures, while respecting the principle of proportionality.
Poleg najmanjšega nabora preiskovalnih ukrepov iz te uredbe bi morali imeti evropski delegirani tožilci pravico zahtevati ali odrediti vse ukrepe, ki so v skladu z nacionalnim pravom na voljo tožilcem v podobnih nacionalnih zadevah.
Those measures should be available with regard to the offences that are within the mandate of the EPPO, at least where they are punishable by a maximum penalty of at least 4 years of imprisonment, for the purpose of its investigations and prosecutions, but may be subject to limitations in accordance with national law.
Razpoložljivost bi se morala zagotavljati v vseh primerih, ko predvideni preiskovalni ukrep obstaja, vendar se zanjo lahko uporabljajo omejitve v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
In addition to the minimum set of investigation measures listed in this Regulation, European Delegated Prosecutors should be entitled to request or to order any measures which are available to prosecutors under national law in similar national cases.
Evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, bi moral imeti v čezmejnih primerih možnost, da mu pomagajo pomočniki evropskih delegiranih tožilcev, ko je treba ukrepati v drugih državah članicah.
Availability should be ensured in all situations where the indicated investigative measure exists but may be subject to limitations in accordance with national law.
Kadar je za takšen ukrep potrebna sodna odobritev, bi bilo treba jasno navesti, v kateri državi članici bi bilo treba odobritev pridobiti, v vsakem primeru pa bi morala biti odobritev ena sama.
In cross-border cases, the handling European Delegated Prosecutor should be able to rely on assisting European Delegated Prosecutors when measures need to be undertaken in other Member States.
Če sodni organi preiskovalni ukrep dokončno zavrnejo, torej po tem, ko so izčrpana vsa pravna sredstva, bi moral evropski delegirani tožilec, ki obravnava zadevo, zahtevo ali nalog umakniti.
Where judicial authorisation is required for such a measure, it should be clearly specified in which Member State the authorisation should be obtained, but in any case there should be only one authorisation.
Možnost uporabe pravnih instrumentov o vzajemnem priznavanju ali čezmejnem sodelovanju, predvidena v tej uredbi, ne bi smela nadomestiti specifičnih pravil o čezmejnih preiskavah iz te uredbe.
If an investigation measure is finally refused by the judicial authorities, namely after all legal remedies have been exhausted, the handling European Delegated Prosecutor should withdraw the request or the order.
Morala pa bi jih dopolnjevati ter zagotoviti, da se, kadar so v čezmejni preiskavi potrebni ukrepi, ki pa niso na voljo v nacionalnem pravu za povsem nacionalne primere, pri izvajanju preiskave ali pregona ti ukrepi lahko uporabljajo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom o izvajanju zadevnega instrumenta.
The possibility foreseen in this Regulation to have recourse to legal instruments on mutual recognition or cross-border cooperation should not replace the specific rules on cross-border investigations under this Regulation.
Določbe te uredbe o čezmejnem sodelovanju ne bi smele posegati v obstoječe pravne instrumente, ki lajšajo čezmejno sodelovanje med nacionalnimi organi, ki niso tožilstvo ali sodni organi.