natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average sales price of that type was equal to or higher than the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
V vseh drugih primerih je bila v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da so se povprečnim proizvodnim stroškom za zadevno vrsto izdelka prišteli nastali PSA-stroški in dobiček, ustvarjen na kanadskem trgu v obdobju preiskave.
This price was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that type made during the investigation period.
V prvotni preiskavi se je pri primerjavi cen pokazalo, da obstajajo razlike med izdelki, ki vplivajo na te cene, vključno z razlikami v kakovosti surovin za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka na Kitajskem.
In all other instances, normal value was constructed in line with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation by adding to the average cost of manufacturing of the relevant product type SG&A costs incurred and profit realised on the Canadian market during the investigation period.
To je povzročilo velika nihanja cen, ki so jih kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki zaračunavali pri izvozu zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
The original investigation revealed that, for the purpose of price comparison, there were product differences affecting said prices, including the quality of inputs for the production of the product concerned in China.
Vendar so vložniki, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 97 do 103, predložili dokaze, da je bilo to glavno razlikovanje medtem odpravljeno in da so se kitajski proizvajalci pri izvozu v Unijo preusmerili v vrste izdelka višje kakovosti.
This resulted in large fluctuations in prices charged by the Chinese exporting producers when exporting the product concerned to the Union.
V skladu s tem je Komisija pri določanju normalne vrednosti uporabila dva scenarija za izračun: scenarij 1, pri katerem so se upoštevali vsi primerljivi izdelki, ki jih proizvaja in prodaja proizvajalec iz primerljive države, in scenarij 2, pri katerem se je upoštevala le najcenejša vrsta izdelka, ki je verjetno ustrezala tudi vrstam izdelka nižje kakovosti.
As set out in recitals 97 to 103 below, the applicants, however, presented evidence that this main distinction had disappeared in the meantime and that Chinese producers had moved to higher-quality product types when exporting to the Union.
V drugem scenariju je normalna vrednost temeljila zgolj na dejanski domači ceni, ki je bila izračunana kot povprečna cena domače prodaje v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Accordingly, when determining normal value, the Commission used two calculation scenarios: scenario 1, taking into account all comparable products produced and sold by the analogue country producer, and scenario 2, taking into account only the cheapest product type, which likely corresponded also to lower product quality types.
V prvem scenariju pa je več kot polovica normalnih vrednosti temeljila na dejanskih domačih cenah, preostanek pa je bil konstruiran, ker zahteva glede 80-odstotnega praga in/ali zahteva glede dobičkonosnosti iz uvodne izjave 50 nista bili izpolnjeni ali pa ni bilo domače prodaje določene vrste izdelka.
In the latter scenario, normal value was solely based on the actual domestic price, which was calculated as an average price of the domestic sales made during the review investigation period.
Proizvajalec iz primerljive države je v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom izdelek proizvajal v vseh kakovostnih razredih, proizvajal pa je celo nekaj nišnih izdelkov z visoko dodano vrednostjo, ki se niso upoštevali pri izračunih dampinga.
In the former, more than half of the normal values were based on actual domestic prices and the remainder was constructed, because either the 80 % threshold and/or the profitability requirement as mentioned in recital 50 above was not met or there were no domestic sales of a particular product type.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 59 do 60, sta ta scenarija za izračun dala različne rezultate glede stopnje dampinga.
The analogue country producer during the review investigation period produced the entire range of product qualities and even some niche high added value products which were not taken into consideration for the dumping calculations.
Izvozna cena
As noted in recitals 59 to 60 below, these two calculation scenarios yielded different dumping margin results.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 16, kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki niso sodelovali v preiskavi.
Export price
Izvozna cena je torej v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe temeljila na najboljših razpoložljivih informacijah.
As stated in recital 16, the Chinese exporting producers did not cooperate in the investigation.
Cena CIF na meji Unije je bila določena na podlagi statističnih podatkov, ki so na voljo pri Eurostatu.
Therefore, the export price was based on the best information available, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Primerjava in prilagoditve
The CIF price at Union border was established on the basis of the statistics available on Eurostat.
Komisija je primerjala normalno vrednost (pri čemer se je opirala na scenarij za izračun 1 ali 2, kot sta opisana v uvodni izjavi 52) in izvozno ceno na podlagi franko tovarna.
Comparison and adjustments
Kadar je bilo to utemeljeno s potrebo po zagotovitvi poštene primerjave, je v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno prilagodila za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen.
The Commission compared the normal value (basing itself either on calculation scenario 1 or 2, as set out in recital 52 above) and the export price on an ex-works basis.
V zvezi z domačimi cenami proizvajalca iz primerljive države so bile opravljene prilagoditve za stroške notranjega prevoza in stroške pakiranja, kjer je bilo to ustrezno, ter znižanja in popuste.
Where justified by the need to ensure a fair comparison, the Commission adjusted the normal value and the export price for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Skupno so prilagoditve obsegale [5–10 %] celotne fakturirane vrednosti.
Concerning the domestic prices of the analogue country producer, adjustments were made for domestic transportation costs and packing costs, where appropriate, rebates and discounts.
Ustrezne prilagoditve so bile izvedena za stroške proizvodnje.
The total impact of the adjustments was [5-10 %] of the total invoice value.
Kar zadeva izvozne cene, je bila vrednost franko tovarna določena tako, da so se od cene CIF na meji Unije odšteli stroški prevoza, zavarovanja, manipuliranja in druge prilagoditve, kot so bili ocenjeni v prvotni preiskavi ([5–10 %] fakturirane vrednosti).
The corresponding adjustments were made to the cost of production.
Stopnja dampinga
As regards export prices, the ex-works factory value was determined by deducting from the CIF price at Union border the costs for transport, insurance, handling and other allowances, as calculated in the original investigation ([5-10 %] of the invoice value).
Na podlagi navedenega je ob upoštevanju vseh primerljivih izdelkov, ki jih je proizvajalec iz primerljive države proizvedel in prodal v skladu s scenarijem 1 (glej uvodno izjavo 52), izračunana stopnja dampinga, izražena kot delež cene franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve, znašala 205,5 %.
Dumping margin
Vendar je ta izračun, kot je bilo navedeno, vključeval vse primerljive izdelke, ki jih je proizvedel in prodal proizvajalec iz primerljive države.
On the basis of the above, when taking into account all comparable products produced and sold by the analogue country producer under scenario 1 (see recital 52 above), the calculated dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, was 205,5 %.
Zlasti zaradi nesodelovanja proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni bilo jasno, ali so se vrste izdelka proizvajalca iz primerljive države ujemale s tistimi, ki so jih kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki izvažali v Unijo.
However, as noted above, this calculation included all comparable products produced and sold by the analogue country producer.
Tudi zgolj ob upoštevanju najcenejše vrste izdelka, ki jo je proizvajalec iz primerljive države proizvedel in prodal v skladu s scenarijem 2 (glej uvodno izjavo 52), je bila ugotovljena stopnja dampinga še vedno znatna, saj je znašala 35,1 %.
It was, particularly in light of the non-cooperation by the exporting producers, unclear whether the product types of the analogue country producer matched the ones exported by the Chinese exporting producers to the Union.
Komisija je poskušala tudi izračunati stopnjo dampinga po posameznih vrstah izdelka.
Even when only considering the cheapest product type produced and sold by the analogue country producer, under scenario 2 (see recital 52 above), the dumping margin found was still significant at 35,1 %.
Vendar se je to zaradi nesodelovanja kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in s tem tudi pomanjkanja dejanskih podatkov o vrstah kitajskega izdelka štelo za neizvedljivo v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa.
The Commission also attempted to perform a product-type-by-product-type dumping margin calculation.
Ker pa je Komisija še vedno imela podatke o vrstah izdelka iz prvotne preiskave, jih je uporabila za tretji predizračun stopnje dampinga, da bi potrdila scenarij 1 ali 2 za izračun stopnje dampinga.
However, given the absence of cooperation from Chinese exporting producers and therefore also the absence of real Chinese product-type data, this was deemed impossible for the expiry review investigation period.
Rezultat tega tretjega izračuna so bile stopnje dampinga od 35,7 % do 46,4 %.
However, because the Commission was still in possession of product type data from the original investigation, the Commission used this data to perform a pro forma third dumping margin calculation to confirm either dumping margin calculation scenario 1 or 2.
Ker je ta tretji izračun pokazal, da je še vedno obstajal damping za izvoz zadevnega izdelka v Unijo, se je Komisija odločila, da razen navedene ugotovitve o dampingu dejanske številke, ki jih je pokazal ta izračun, niso zanesljive.
That third calculation yielded dumping margins between 35,7 % and 46,4 %.
To je bilo zato, ker preiskava ni pokazala nobenih dokazov, da je nabor vrst izdelka za izvoz v Unijo ostal enak vse od prvotne preiskave.
While this third calculation revealed that dumping still existed for the export of the product concerned to the Union, the Commission decided that — beyond that finding of dumping — no reliance could be given to the actual numbers this calculation showed.
Dejansko in kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 97 do 103, so vložniki predložili dokaze, da so se kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki medtem preusmerili na vrste izdelka z višjo dodano vrednostjo v skladu s svojim tehnološkim napredkom.
This was because the investigation revealed no evidence that the product type mix for export to the Union remained the same since the original investigation.
Zato ta simulacija predstavlja najnižjo možno oceno stopenj dampinga z razmeroma večjo osredotočenostjo na cenejše vrste izdelka iz preteklosti.
Indeed, and as set out in recitals 97 to 103 below, the applicants presented evidence that Chinese exporting producers in the meantime had shifted to higher added-value product types in line with their technological progress.
Poleg tega je bilo, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 5, ugotovljeno, da so bile nekatere vrste izdelka nekoliko spremenjene zaradi izogibanja ukrepom.
As a consequence, this simulation represents the lowest possible estimate of dumping margins by focusing relatively more on the cheaper product types of the past.
Nobena ugotovitev ni bila diskreditirana s protidokazi kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Moreover, as mentioned in recital 5 above, certain product types were found to have been slightly modified in order to circumvent the measures.
Zaradi navedenega je Komisija odločila, da je izračun stopnje dampinga v scenariju 2 (ugotovljena stopnja dampinga v višini 35,1 %) predstavljal najnižjo možno oceno dejanskih stopenj dampinga v odsotnosti dejanskih podatkov kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zadevnega izdelka.
Neither finding was discredited by counter-evidence from Chinese exporting producers.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da so kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zadevni izdelek v Unijo vsekakor še naprej izvažali po dampinških cenah.
As a consequence of the above, the Commission decided that the dumping margin calculation performed in scenario 2 (finding a dumping margin of 35,1 %) represented the lowest possible estimate of actual dumping margins in the absence of real Chinese exporting producer data of the product concerned.
Dokazi o verjetnosti ponovitve dampinga
The Commission therefore concluded that in any event the Chinese exporting producers continued to export the product concerned to the Union at dumped prices during the review investigation period.
Komisija je nadalje proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi se damping v primeru izteka ukrepov nadaljeval.
Evidence of likelihood of recurrence of dumping
Pri tem je proučila ravnanje kitajskih izvoznikov na drugih trgih, kitajsko proizvodno in neizkoriščeno zmogljivost ter privlačnost trga Unije.
The Commission further analysed whether there was a likelihood of continuation of dumping should the measures be allowed to lapse.
Izvoz v tretje države
When doing so, it looked into the behaviour of Chinese exporters on other markets, the Chinese production capacity and spare capacity, and the attractiveness of the Union market.
Zaradi nesodelovanja kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov natančne informacije o ceni izvoza iz LRK v druge države niso bile na voljo.
Exports to third countries
Razpoložljivi podatki o cenah iz kitajskih statističnih podatkov o izvozu so se nanašali na širši obseg izdelka, nanje pa so se kljub temu v svojih predložitvah sklicevali tako vložnik kot kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, le da z nasprotujočimi si zaključki.
In the absence of cooperation from Chinese exporting producers, precise export price information from the PRC to the other countries was not available.
Poleg tega ni bilo mogoče vedeti, kakšen nabor izdelkov se izvaža v tretje države, zaradi česar Komisija ni mogla določiti primerljive ravni cen kitajskega izvoza na druge trge.
The price data available from the Chinese export statistics concerned a wider product scope, but was nevertheless referred to by both the applicant and the Chinese exporting producers in their submissions, with opposing conclusions.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da na podlagi dokazov, ki jih je vložnik predložil v obliki statističnih podatkov, ki se nanašajo na širši obseg izdelka, ni mogoče ugotoviti, ali je damping na drugih trgih obstajal ali ne.
Furthermore, the product mix of the exports to the third countries could not be known, thereby making it impossible for the Commission to determine the comparable price level of the Chinese exports to other markets.
Proizvodna zmogljivost in neizkoriščena zmogljivost v LRK
Consequently, the Commission considered that the evidence provided by the applicant in the form of statistical data referring to a wider product scope, did not allow it to conclude whether there was dumping to other markets or not.
Zaradi nesodelovanja kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov se je neizkoriščena zmogljivost v LRK določila na podlagi študije, ki jo je naročil vložnik in je bila vključena v zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa.
Production capacity and spare capacity in the PRC
Vložnik je naknadno predložil posodobljeno različico študije.
In the absence of cooperation of Chinese exporting producers, the determination of spare capacity in the PRC was based on a study commissioned by the applicant and included with the expiry review request.
V skladu s prvotno študijo je bila skupna zmogljivost v LRK 1840 milijonov kvadratnih metrov, obseg proizvodnje pa 1390 milijonov kvadratnih metrov.
An updated version of the study was subsequently submitted by the applicant.
Neizkoriščena zmogljivost je bila torej velika in je znašala 450 milijonov kvadratnih metrov.
According to the original study, the total capacity in the PRC was 1840 million square metres, while production volume was 1390 million square metres, thus leaving a large spare capacity of 450 million square metres.
V skladu s posodobljeno različico je bila skupna zmogljivost v LRK 2295 milijonov kvadratnih metrov, obseg proizvodnje pa 1544 milijonov kvadratnih metrov.
According to the updated version, the total capacity in the PRC was 2295 million square metres and the production volume was 1544 million square metres, thus leaving an even larger spare capacity of 751 million square metres.
Neizkoriščena zmogljivost je bila torej še večja in je znašala 751 milijonov kvadratnih metrov.
Taking into account that a capacity utilisation rate of 100 % could not realistically be achieved, the applicant itself considered that a maximum utilisation rate of between 85 % and 90 % would be more adequate.
Ob upoštevanju, da 100-odstotne stopnje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti realno ni bilo mogoče doseči, je vložnik sam menil, da bi bila ustreznejša najvišja stopnja izkoriščenosti med 85 % in 90 %.
On the basis of the more conservative estimate of 85 % capacity utilisation rate, the spare capacity actually available would be 406 million square metres.
Na podlagi bolj zadržane ocene, tj. 85-odstotne stopnje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, bi dejansko razpoložljiva neizkoriščena zmogljivost znašala 406 milijonov kvadratnih metrov.
In comparison, the total Union consumption was 714 million square metres in the review investigation period, thus pointing to a significant spare capacity that would be available to be directed toward the Union market, should the measures be allowed to lapse.
Za primerjavo, skupna potrošnja Unije je bila v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom 714 milijonov kvadratnih metrov, kar kaže na znatno neizkoriščeno zmogljivost, ki bi bila v primeru izteka ukrepov na voljo, da se usmeri na trg Unije.
The Chinese exporting producers disputed the reliability of the study and requested the Commission to disregard it.
Kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki so ugovarjali zanesljivosti študije in od Komisije zahtevali, naj je ne upošteva.
First, they claimed that the lack of a meaningful open version of the study did not allow them to comment.
Prvič, trdili so, da ni na voljo smiselne nezaupne različice, ki bi jim omogočila predložitev pripomb.
Second, they pointed out that the expert who had compiled the study was not impartial due to his links with the Union industry.
Drugič, poudarili so, da strokovnjak, ki je pripravil študijo, ni nepristranski zaradi svojih povezav z industrijo Unije.
Third, they alleged that any spare capacity was going to be absorbed by the increasing domestic demand in the PRC, as suggested by a quote from an article in a specialised magazine which referred to the strong growth of the construction sector in the PRC [10].
Tretjič, trdili so, da bo morebitno neizkoriščeno zmogljivost absorbiralo vse večje domače povpraševanje v LRK, kot je bilo navedeno v članku iz specializirane revije, v katerem je bila omenjena velika rast gradbeništva v LRK [10].
As regards the first claim by the Chinese exporting producers, the Commission pointed out that an open version of the updated study had been included in the open file.
Kar zadeva prvo trditev kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, je Komisija poudarila, da je bila nezaupna različica posodobljene študije vključena v nezaupno dokumentacijo.
The Commission found this version to be meaningful, allowing the Chinese exporting producers to make more detailed comments and to forward substantiated evidence rebutting the study's statements and conclusions.
Komisija je menila, da je ta različica smiselna ter da kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom omogoča predložitev podrobnejših pripomb in posredovanje utemeljenih dokazov za izpodbijanje navedb in sklepov iz študije.
In any case, the Chinese exporting producers did not specify what part of the open version of the study was not meaningful enough for them to comment on.
Vsekakor kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki niso navedli, kateri del nezaupne različice študije se jim ni zdel dovolj smiseln, da bi podali pripombe nanj.
This argument was, consequently, rejected.
Ta utemeljitev je bila zato zavrnjena.
As regards the second claim, the Commission pointed out that in the absence of cooperation from the PRC and any alternative detailed information concerning capacity provided by the Chinese exporting producers, the Commission considered that the study constituted the best fact available.
Kar zadeva drugo trditev, je Komisija poudarila, da je zaradi nesodelovanja LRK in dejstva, da kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki niso predložili drugih podrobnih informacij v zvezi z zmogljivostjo, menila, da študija predstavlja najboljša razpoložljiva dejstva.
Nor was the Commission able to retrieve information that would call the study into question.
Prav tako Komisija ni mogla pridobiti informacij, ki bi postavile študijo pod vprašaj.
As regards the third claim, the Commission agreed that a portion of the production capacity could be used to meet the rising domestic demand.
Kar zadeva tretjo trditev, se je Komisija strinjala, da bi se lahko del proizvodne zmogljivosti porabil za zadovoljevanje vse večjega domačega povpraševanja.
However, the exporting producers did not provide a figure of the domestic consumption in the PRC that could back up their claim that the planned increase in domestic demand would absorb the entire spare capacity.
Vendar proizvajalci izvozniki niso predložili podatkov o domači potrošnji v LRK, s katerimi bi lahko podprli svojo trditev, da bo načrtovano povečanje domačega povpraševanja absorbiralo celotno neizkoriščeno zmogljivost.
Nor did the Commission's investigation yield such a figure.
Tudi s preiskavo Komisije to ni bilo dokazano.
It is also likely that part of the spare capacity would be exported to third countries, not only to the Union.
Verjetno je tudi, da bi se del neizkoriščene zmogljivosti izvozil v tretje države in ne le v Unijo.
The Commission therefore concluded that, even taking into account the current domestic demand in the PRC, the maximum spare capacity that could be expected to be directed to the Union market was, at most 406 million square metres, should the measures be allowed to lapse.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da bi tudi ob upoštevanju sedanjega domačega povpraševanja v LRK največja neizkoriščena zmogljivost, za katero bi se lahko pričakovalo, da se bo usmerila na trg Unije, v primeru izteka ukrepov znašala največ 406 milijonov kvadratnih metrov.
However, it is likely that in the future, part of that spare capacity would also be absorbed by an increase in domestic Chinese consumption and part of it also sold to export markets other than the Union, but, as noted in recitals 66 and 67 to above, no information to this effect was received from interested parties or discovered by the Commission itself.
Vendar je verjetno, da bo v prihodnosti del navedene neizkoriščene zmogljivosti absorbiralo povečanje domače kitajske potrošnje, del pa se bo prodal tudi na druge izvozne trge poleg Unije, vendar, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 66 in 67, zainteresirane strani niso predložile informacij, ki bi te navedbe podprle, prav tako takih informacij ni odkrila Komisija.
Following the additional disclosure, the Chinese exporting producers continued to contest the findings concerning spare capacity.
Po dodatnem razkritju so kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki še naprej izpodbijali ugotovitve v zvezi z neizkoriščeno zmogljivostjo.
They claimed that the assessment of spare capacity was based on mere assumptions and not supported by positive evidence.
Trdili so, da je ocena neizkoriščene zmogljivosti temeljila le na domnevah in ni bila podprta s pozitivnimi dokazi.