natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Taking account of the evolution of terrorist threats to and legal obligations on the Union and Member States under international law, the definition of terrorist offences, of offences related to a terrorist group and of offences related to terrorist activities should be further approximated in all Member States, so that it covers conduct related to, in particular, foreign terrorist fighters and terrorist financing more comprehensively.
Ob upoštevanju spreminjajoče se narave terorističnih groženj Uniji in državam članicam ter njihovih pravnih obveznosti v okviru mednarodnega prava bi bilo treba opredelitev terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s teroristično skupino, in kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorističnimi dejavnostmi, v vseh državah članicah še bolj približati, tako da bi bolj celovito zajemala ravnanje, ki je povezano zlasti s tujimi terorističnimi borci in financiranjem terorizma.
These forms of conduct should also be punishable if committed through the internet, including social media.
Te oblike ravnanj bi morale prav tako biti kaznive, če se storijo prek interneta, vključno z družbenimi mediji.
Furthermore, the cross-border nature of terrorism requires a strong coordinated response and cooperation within and between the Member States, as well as with and among the competent Union agencies and bodies to counter terrorism, including Eurojust and Europol.
Poleg tega čezmejna narava terorizma zahteva odločen in usklajen odziv ter sodelovanje znotraj držav članic in med njimi ter s pristojnimi agencijami in organi Unije za boj proti terorizmu, vključno z Eurojustom in Europolom, in med njimi.
To that end, efficient use of the available tools and resources for cooperation should be made, such as joint investigation teams and coordination meetings facilitated by Eurojust.
V ta namen bi bilo treba učinkovito uporabiti razpoložljiva orodja in sredstva za sodelovanje, kot so skupne preiskovalne enote in usklajevalni sestanki, ki jih organizira Eurojust.
The global character of terrorism necessitates an international answer, requiring the Union and its Member States to strengthen cooperation with relevant third countries.
Globalni značaj terorizma zahteva mednarodni odgovor, za katerega morajo Unija in njene države članice okrepiti sodelovanje z zadevnimi tretjimi državami.
A strong coordinated response and cooperation is also necessary with a view to securing and obtaining electronic evidence.
Odločen in usklajen odziv ter sodelovanje sta potrebna tudi za zagotovitev in pridobivanje elektronskih dokazov.
This Directive exhaustively lists a number of serious crimes, such as attacks against a person’s life, as intentional acts that can qualify as terrorist offences when and insofar as committed with a specific terrorist aim, namely to seriously intimidate a population, to unduly compel a government or an international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act, or to seriously destabilise or destroy the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation.
Ta direktiva taksativno navaja več hudih kaznivih dejanj, kot so napadi na človekovo življenje, kot naklepnih dejanj, ki se lahko štejejo za teroristična kazniva dejanja, kadar in kolikor so storjena s posebnim terorističnim ciljem, tj. resno ustrahovati prebivalstvo, neupravičeno prisiliti vlado ali mednarodno organizacijo, da neko dejanje stori ali opusti, ali resno destabilizirati ali uničiti temeljne politične, ustavne, gospodarske ali socialne strukture države ali mednarodne organizacije.
The threat to commit such intentional acts should also be considered to be a terrorist offence when it is established, on the basis of objective circumstances, that such threat was made with any such terrorist aim.
Tudi grožnjo, da bodo storjena takšna naklepna dejanja, bi bilo treba šteti za teroristično kaznivo dejanje, kadar je na podlagi objektivnih okoliščin ugotovljeno, da je bila takšna grožnja podana s kakršnim koli tovrstnim terorističnim ciljem.
By contrast, acts aiming, for example, to compel a government to perform or abstain from performing any act, without however being included in the exhaustive list of serious crimes, are not considered to be terrorist offences in accordance with this Directive.
Nasprotno pa se dejanja, katerih cilj je na primer prisiliti vlado, da neko dejanje stori ali opusti, ne da bi bila vključena na izčrpen seznam hudih kaznivih dejanj, ne štejejo za teroristična kazniva dejanja v skladu s to direktivo.
The offences related to terrorist activities are of a very serious nature as they have the potential to lead to the commission of terrorist offences and enable terrorists and terrorist groups to maintain and further develop their criminal activities, justifying the criminalisation of such conduct.
Kazniva dejanja, povezana s terorističnimi dejavnostmi, so zelo hude kršitve, saj lahko privedejo do storitve terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ter teroristom in terorističnim skupinam omogočajo, da svoje kaznive dejavnosti ohranjajo in dodatno razvijajo, zato je opredelitev takšnega ravnanja kot kaznivo dejanje upravičena.
The offence of public provocation to commit a terrorist offence act comprises, inter alia, the glorification and justification of terrorism or the dissemination of messages or images online and offline, including those related to the victims of terrorism as a way to gather support for terrorist causes or to seriously intimidate the population.
Kaznivo dejanje javnega ščuvanja k storitvi terorističnega kaznivega dejanja med drugim vključuje poveličevanje in upravičevanje terorizma ali razširjanje sporočil ali slikovnega gradiva na spletu in zunaj njega, tudi v zvezi z žrtvami terorizma, z namenom pridobivanja podpore za teroristične cilje ali resnega ustrahovanja prebivalstva.
Such conduct should be punishable when it causes a danger that terrorist acts may be committed.
Takšno ravnanje bi moralo biti kaznivo, če povzroči nevarnost, da bodo storjena teroristična dejanja.
In each concrete case, when considering whether such a danger is caused, the specific circumstances of the case should be taken into account, such as the author and the addressee of the message, as well as the context in which the act is committed.
V vsakem konkretnem primeru bi bilo treba pri ugotavljanju, ali je povzročena takšna nevarnost, upoštevati posebne okoliščine primera, kot sta avtor in prejemnik sporočila, pa tudi kontekst, v katerem je bilo dejanje storjeno.
The significance and the credible nature of the danger should be also considered when applying the provision on public provocation in accordance with national law.
Pomen in verodostojnost nevarnosti bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi pri uporabi določbe o javnem ščuvanju v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
Criminalisation of receiving training for terrorism complements the existing offence of providing training and specifically addresses the threats resulting from those actively preparing for the commission of terrorist offences, including those ultimately acting alone.
Opredelitev usposabljanja za terorizem kot kaznivo dejanje dopolnjuje obstoječo opredelitev kaznivega dejanja zagotavljanja usposabljanja in posebej obravnava grožnje, ki jih pomenijo tisti, ki se aktivno pripravljajo na storitev terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, vključno s tistimi, ki na koncu delujejo sami.
Receiving training for terrorism includes obtaining knowledge, documentation or practical skills.
Usposabljanje za terorizem vključuje pridobitev znanja, dokumentacije ali praktičnih veščin.
Self-study, including through the internet or consulting other teaching material, should also be considered to be receiving training for terrorism when resulting from active conduct and done with the intent to commit or contribute to the commission of a terrorist offence.
Tudi samostojno učenje, vključno prek interneta ali preučevanja drugega učnega gradiva, bi bilo treba šteti za usposabljanje za terorizem, če je posledica aktivnega ravnanja in se izvaja z namenom storitve ali prispevanja k storitvi terorističnega kaznivega dejanja.
In the context of all of the specific circumstances of the case, this intention can for instance be inferred from the type of materials and the frequency of reference.
V okviru vseh posebnih okoliščin primera je na ta namen na primer mogoče sklepati na podlagi vrste gradiva in pogostosti uporabe.
Thus, downloading a manual to make explosives for the purpose of committing a terrorist offence could be considered to be receiving training for terrorism.
Zato se datotečni prenos priročnika za izdelavo razstreliva za namene storitve terorističnega kaznivega dejanja lahko šteje kot usposabljanje za terorizem.
By contrast, merely visiting websites or collecting materials for legitimate purposes, such as academic or research purposes, is not considered to be receiving training for terrorism under this Directive.
Nasprotno pa se zgolj obiskovanje spletišč ali zbiranja gradiva za zakonite namene, kot so akademski ali raziskovalni nameni, ne šteje za usposabljanje za terorizem na podlagi te direktive.
Considering the seriousness of the threat and the need, in particular, to stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters, it is necessary to criminalise outbound travelling for the purpose of terrorism, namely not only the commission of terrorist offences and providing or receiving training but also the participation in the activities of a terrorist group.
Glede na resnost grožnje in zlasti potrebo po zajezitvi pretoka tujih terorističnih borcev je treba kot kaznivo dejanje opredeliti odhodno potovanje za namen terorizma, kar ne zajema zgolj storitve terorističnih kaznivih dejanj in usposabljanja ali zagotavljanja usposabljanja, temveč tudi sodelovanje v dejavnostih teroristične skupine.
It is not indispensable to criminalise the act of travelling as such.
Ni nujno, da se kot kaznivo dejanje opredeli potovanje kot tako.
Furthermore, travel to the territory of the Union for the purpose of terrorism presents a growing security threat.
Poleg tega potovanje na ozemlje Unije za namen terorizma pomeni naraščajočo varnostno grožnjo.
Member States may also decide to address terrorist threats arising from travel for the purpose of terrorism to the Member State concerned by criminalising preparatory acts, which may include planning or conspiracy, with a view to committing or contributing to a terrorist offence.
Države članice se lahko odločijo tudi za obravnavanje terorističnih groženj, ki izhajajo iz potovanja za namen terorizma v zadevno državo članico, tako da kot kazniva dejanja opredelijo pripravljalna dejanja, ki lahko vključujejo načrtovanje ali zaroto z namenom storitve terorističnega kaznivega dejanja ali prispevanja k njemu.
Any act of facilitation of such travel should also be criminalised.
Kot kaznivo dejanje bi bilo treba opredeliti tudi vsako dejanje omogočanja tovrstnega potovanja.
Illicit trade in firearms, oil, drugs, cigarettes, counterfeit goods and cultural objects, as well as trafficking in human beings, racketeering and extortion have become lucrative ways for terrorist groups to obtain funding.
Nezakonita trgovina s strelnim orožjem, nafto, drogami, cigaretami, ponarejenim blagom in kulturnimi dobrinami, pa tudi trgovina z ljudmi ter izsiljevanje in oderuštvo so postali donosen način financiranja terorističnih skupin.
In this context, the increasing links between organised crime and terrorist groups constitute a growing security threat to the Union and should therefore be taken into account by the authorities of the Member States involved in criminal proceedings.
V tem smislu vse večje število povezav med organiziranim kriminalom in terorističnimi skupinami pomeni naraščajočo varnostno grožnjo v Uniji, kar bi torej morali upoštevati organi držav članic, ki so udeleženi v kazenskem postopku.
Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10] establishes common rules on the prevention of the use of the Union’s financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing.
Direktiva (EU) 2015/849 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10] določa skupna pravila o preprečevanju uporabe finančnega sistema Unije za namene pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma.
In addition to this preventive approach, terrorist financing should be punishable in the Member States.
Poleg tega preventivnega pristopa bi moralo biti financiranje terorizma v državah članicah kaznivo.
Criminalisation should cover not only the financing of terrorist acts, but also the financing of a terrorist group, as well as other offences related to terrorist activities, such as the recruitment and training, or travel for the purpose of terrorism, with a view to disrupting the support structures facilitating the commission of terrorist offences.
Opredelitev kaznivega dejanja bi morala zajemati ne le financiranje terorističnih dejanj, temveč tudi financiranje terorističnih skupin ter druga kazniva dejanja, povezana s terorističnimi dejavnostmi, kot so novačenje in usposabljanje ali potovanje za namen terorizma, da bi razbili podporne strukture, ki omogočajo storitev terorističnih kaznivih dejanj.
The provision of material support for terrorism through persons engaging in or acting as intermediaries in the supply or movement of services, assets and goods, including trade transactions involving the entry into or exit from the Union, such as the sale, acquisition or exchange of a cultural object of archaeological, artistic, historical or scientific interest illegally removed from an area controlled by a terrorist group at the time of the removal, should be punishable, in the Member States, as aiding and abetting terrorism or as terrorist financing if performed with the knowledge that these operations or the proceeds thereof are intended to be used, in full or in part, for the purpose of terrorism or will benefit terrorist groups.
V državah članicah bi moralo biti kaznivo zagotavljanje materialne podpore za terorizem prek oseb, ki dobavljajo storitve, premoženje in blago ali zagotavljajo njihov pretok, vključno s trgovinskimi posli, ki vključujejo vstop v Unijo ali izhod iz nje, kot so prodaja, pridobitev ali izmenjava kulturnih dobrin arheološkega, umetniškega, zgodovinskega ali znanstvenega pomena, ki so bili nezakonito odstranjeni z območja pod nadzorom teroristične skupine v času odstranitve, in prek oseb, ki pri navedenem delujejo kot posredniki, in sicer kot pomoč pri terorizmu ali financiranje terorizma, če se izvaja ob zavedanju, da naj bi bila ta dejanja ali z njimi pridobljena sredstva v celoti ali delno namenjena za uporabo za namen terorizma ali pa bodo koristila terorističnim skupinam.
Further measures may be necessary with a view to effectively combating the illicit trade in cultural objects as a source of income for terrorist groups.
Za učinkovit boj proti nezakoniti trgovini s kulturnimi dobrinami kot viru dohodka za teroristične skupine bi bili lahko potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi.
The attempt to travel for the purpose of terrorism, to provide training for terrorism and to recruit for terrorism should be punishable.
Poskus potovanja za namen terorizma, zagotavljanja usposabljanja za terorizem oziroma novačenja za terorizem bi moral biti kazniv.
With regard to the criminal offences provided for in this Directive, the notion of intention must apply to all the elements constituting those offences.
Kar zadeva kazniva dejanja, določena v tej direktivi, se mora naklep nanašati na vse elemente, ki jih sestavljajo.
The intentional nature of an act or omission may be inferred from objective, factual circumstances.
Na naklepno naravo dejanja ali opustitve dejanja je mogoče sklepati iz objektivnih dejanskih okoliščin.
Penalties and sanctions should be provided for natural and legal persons being liable for such offences, which reflect the seriousness of such offences.
Za fizične in pravne osebe, ki so odgovorne za tovrstna kazniva dejanja, bi bilo treba določiti sankcije, ki ustrezajo teži teh kaznivih dejanj.
When recruitment and training for terrorism are directed towards a child, Member States should ensure that judges can take this circumstance into account when sentencing offenders, although there is no obligation on judges to increase the sentence.
Kadar je novačenje in usposabljanje za terorizem usmerjeno v otroka, bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da lahko sodniki to okoliščino upoštevajo pri izrekanju sankcije storilcem, čeprav sodniki ne bi smeli biti zavezani izreči strožje sankcije.
It remains within the discretion of the judge to assess that circumstance together with the other facts of the particular case.
Sodnik ohranja diskrecijsko pravico, da to okoliščino presodi skupaj z drugimi dejstvi v konkretnem primeru.
Jurisdictional rules should be established to ensure that the offences laid down in this Directive may be effectively prosecuted.
Določiti bi bilo treba pravila o pristojnosti, da bi se zagotovil učinkovit pregon kaznivih dejanj, določenih v tej direktivi.
In particular, it appears appropriate to establish jurisdiction for the offences committed by the providers of training for terrorism, whatever their nationality, in view of the possible effects of such conducts on the territory of the Union and of the close material connection between the offences of providing and receiving training for terrorism.
Zlasti se zdi ustrezno določiti pristojnost za kazniva dejanja, ki jih storijo osebe, ki zagotavljajo usposabljanje za terorizem, ne glede na njihovo državljanstvo, in sicer glede na morebitne posledice takšnega ravnanja na ozemlju Unije ter tesno materialno povezanost med kaznivima dejanjema usposabljanja za terorizem in zagotavljanja takšnega usposabljanja.
To ensure the success of investigations and the prosecution of terrorist offences, offences related to a terrorist group or offences related to terrorist activities, those responsible for investigating or prosecuting such offences should have the possibility to make use of effective investigative tools such as those which are used in combating organised crime or other serious crimes.
Da bi bila preiskovanje in pregon terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s teroristično skupino, ali kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorističnimi dejavnostmi, uspešna, bi morali imeti tisti, ki so pristojni za preiskovanje ali pregon tovrstnih kaznivih dejanj, možnost uporabe učinkovitih preiskovalnih orodij, kot se na primer uporabljajo v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu ali drugim hudim kaznivim dejanjem.
The use of such tools, in accordance with national law, should be targeted and take into account the principle of proportionality and the nature and seriousness of the offences under investigation and should respect the right to the protection of personal data.
Uporaba teh orodij v skladu z nacionalnim pravom bi morala biti ciljno usmerjena in upoštevati načelo sorazmernosti ter naravo in težo preiskovanih kaznivih dejanj ter spoštovati pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov.
Such tools should, where appropriate, include, for example, the search of any personal property, the interception of communications, covert surveillance including electronic surveillance, the taking and the keeping of audio recordings, in private or public vehicles and places, and of visual images of persons in public vehicles and places, and financial investigations.
Taka orodja bi po potrebi morala vključevati na primer preiskavo vsega osebnega premoženja, prestrezanje komunikacij, tajno opazovanje, vključno z elektronskim nadzorom, izvajanje zvočnega snemanja v zasebnih ali javnih vozilih ter na zasebnih ali javnih mestih ter vizualnega snemanja oseb v javnih vozilih in na javnih mestih, in hrambo takšnih zvočnih in vizualnih posnetkov, ter finančne preiskave.
An effective means of combating terrorism on the internet is to remove online content constituting a public provocation to commit a terrorist offence at its source.
Učinkovito sredstvo za boj proti terorizmu na spletu je odstranitev spletnih vsebin, ki pomenijo javno ščuvanje k storitvi terorističnega kaznivega dejanja, pri viru.
Member States should use their best endeavours to cooperate with third countries in seeking to secure the removal of online content constituting a public provocation to commit a terrorist offence from servers within their territory.
Države članice bi morale po najboljših močeh sodelovati s tretjimi državami v prizadevanju odstraniti spletne vsebine, ki pomenijo javno ščuvanje k storitvi terorističnega kaznivega dejanja, s strežnikov na njihovem ozemlju.
However, when removal of such content at its source is not feasible, mechanisms may also be put in place to block access from Union territory to such content.
Če pa odstranitev tovrstnih vsebin pri viru ni izvedljiva, se lahko vzpostavijo tudi mehanizmi za preprečitev dostopa do teh vsebin z ozemlja Unije.
The measures undertaken by Member States in accordance with this Directive in order to remove online content constituting a public provocation to commit a terrorist offence or, where this is not feasible, block access to such content could be based on public action, such as legislative, non-legislative or judicial action.
Ukrepi, ki jih države članice sprejmejo v skladu s to direktivo za odstranitev spletnih vsebin, ki pomenijo javno ščuvanje k storitvi terorističnega kaznivega dejanja ali, kadar to ni izvedljivo, preprečitev dostopa do teh vsebin, bi lahko temeljili na javnem ukrepanju, kot je zakonodajno, nezakonodajno ali sodno ukrepanje.
In that context, this Directive is without prejudice to voluntary action taken by the internet industry to prevent the misuse of its services or to any support for such action by Member States, such as detecting and flagging terrorist content.
V navedenem smislu ta direktiva ne posega v prostovoljno ukrepanje internetnega sektorja za preprečevanje zlorabe njegovih storitev ali v podporo držav članic takšnim ukrepom, kot so prepoznavanje terorističnih vsebin in obveščanje o njih.
Whichever basis for action or method is chosen, Member States should ensure that it provides an adequate level of legal certainty and predictability for users and service providers and the possibility of judicial redress in accordance with national law.
Ne glede na podlago za ukrepanje ali metodo bi morale države članice zagotoviti ustrezno raven pravne varnosti in predvidljivosti za uporabnike in ponudnike storitev ter možnost sodnega varstva v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
Any such measures must take account of the rights of the end users and comply with existing legal and judicial procedures and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter).
Pri vseh teh ukrepih je treba upoštevati pravice končnih uporabnikov ter postopati skladno z obstoječimi pravnimi in pravosodnimi postopki ter Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina).
The removal of online content constituting a public provocation to commit a terrorist offence or, where it is not feasible, the blocking of access to such content, in accordance with this Directive, should be without prejudice to the rules laid down in Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [11].
Odstranitev ali, kjer ta ni izvedljiva, preprečitev spletnih vsebin, ki pomenijo javno ščuvanje k storitvi terorističnega kaznivega dejanja, ali, kjer ta ni izvedljiva, preprečitev dostopa do teh vsebin, v skladu s to direktivo, ne bi smela posegati v pravila iz Direktive 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11].
In particular, no general obligation should be imposed on service providers to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor to actively seek out facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity.
Zlasti se ne bi smela ponudnikom storitev naložiti splošna obveznost spremljanja informacij, ki jih prenašajo ali shranjujejo, niti aktivnega ugotavljanja dejstev ali okoliščin, ki kažejo na nezakonito dejavnost.