natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods [1], and in particular Article 13(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih [1] in zlasti člena 13(4) Uredbe,
The Bulgarian, German and Spanish language versions of Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 [2] contain an error in the claim concerning the first occurrence of the nutrient, substance, food or food category ‘Meal replacement for weight control’ in the Annex.
Bolgarska, nemška in španska jezikovna različica Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 432/2012 [2] vsebujejo napako v trditvi v zvezi s prvim vnosom v kategoriji hranil, snovi, živil ali kategorij živil „Nadomestni obrok za nadzor nad telesno težo“ v Prilogi.
The Finnish language version of Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 contains an error in the conditions and/or restrictions of use of the food and/or additional statement or warning concerning the second occurrence of the nutrient, substance, food or food category ‘Meal replacement for weight control’ in the Annex.
Finska jezikovna različica Uredbe (EU) št. 432/2012 vsebuje napako v pogojih in/ali omejitvah uporabe živila in/ali dodatnem pojasnilu ali opozorilu v zvezi z drugim vnosom v kategoriji hranil, snovi, živil ali kategorij živil „Nadomestni obrok za nadzor nad telesno težo“ v Prilogi.
The Portuguese language version of Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 contains an error in the conditions and/or restrictions of use of the food and/or additional statement or warning concerning both occurrences of the nutrient, substance, food or food category ‘Meal replacement for weight control’ in the Annex.
Portugalska jezikovna različica Uredbe (EU) št. 432/2012 vsebuje napako v pogojih in/ali omejitvah uporabe živila in/ali dodatnem pojasnilu ali opozorilu v zvezi z obema vnosoma v kategoriji hranil, snovi, živil ali kategorij živil „Nadomestni obrok za nadzor nad telesno težo“ v Prilogi.
The Bulgarian, Finnish, German, Spanish and Portuguese language versions of Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 should therefore be corrected accordingly.
Bolgarsko, finsko, nemško, špansko in portugalsko jezikovno različico Uredbe (EU) št. 432/2012 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno popraviti.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 of 16 May 2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children's development and health (OJ L 136, 25.5.2012, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 432/2012 z dne 16. maja 2012 o seznamu dovoljenih zdravstvenih trditev na živilih, razen trditev, ki se nanašajo na zmanjšanje tveganja za nastanek bolezni ter na razvoj in zdravje otrok (UL L 136, 25.5.2012, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1408
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/1408
withdrawing the acceptance of the undertaking for two exporting producers under Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU confirming the acceptance of an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China for the period of application of definitive measures
o umiku sprejetja zaveze dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov v okviru Izvedbenega sklepa 2013/707/EU o potrditvi sprejetja zaveze, ponujene v okviru protidampinškega in protisubvencijskega postopka v zvezi z uvozom fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, za obdobje uporabe dokončnih ukrepov
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] (‘the basic anti-dumping Regulation’), and in particular Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije [1] („osnovna protidampinška uredba“), in zlasti člena 8 Uredbe,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union [2] (‘the basic anti-subsidy Regulation’), and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije [2] („osnovna protisubvencijska uredba“), in zlasti člena 13 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China [3], and in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1238/2013 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani [3] in zlasti člena 3 te uredbe,
Having regard to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China [4], and in particular Article 2 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1239/2013 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani [4] in zlasti člena 2 te uredbe,
By Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 [5], the European Commission (‘the Commission’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the European Union (‘the Union’) of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules (‘modules’) and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’).
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je z Uredbo (EU) št. 513/2013 [5] določila začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija („moduli“) in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic in rezin) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) ali ki so od tam poslani, v Evropsko unijo („Unija“).
By Decision 2013/423/EU [6], the Commission accepted that price undertaking with regard to the provisional anti-dumping duty.
Komisija je s Sklepom 2013/423/EU [6] sprejela navedeno cenovno zavezo glede začasne protidampinške dajatve.
By Regulation (EU) No 748/2013 [7], the Commission amended Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 to introduce the technical changes necessary due to the acceptance of the undertaking with regard to the provisional anti-dumping duty.
Komisija je z Uredbo (EU) št. 748/2013 [7] spremenila Uredbo (EU) št. 513/2013, in sicer je uvedla tehnične spremembe, potrebne za sprejetje zaveze glede začasne protidampinške dajatve.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013, the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports into the Union of modules and cells originating in or consigned from the PRC (‘the products concerned’).
Svet je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1238/2013 določil dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz modulov in celic s poreklom iz LRK ali ki so od tam poslani („zadevni izdelki“), v Unijo.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, the Council also imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports into the Union of the products concerned.
Svet je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1239/2013 prav tako določil dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov v Unijo.
Shenzhen Topray Solar Co.
družba Shenzhen Topray Solar Co.
Ltd, together with its related companies in the PRC and in the Union, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code: B880 (‘Topray Solar’);
Ltd skupaj z njenimi povezanimi družbami v LRK in Uniji, ki so skupaj zajete z dodatno oznako TARIC: B880 („Topray Solar“);
Yuhuan BLD Solar Technology Co.
družba Yuhuan BLD Solar Technology Co.
Ltd, together with its related company in the PRC, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code: B899 (‘BLD Solar’).
Ltd skupaj z njeno povezano družbo v LRK, ki sta skupaj zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC: B899 („BLD Solar“).
The anti-dumping and countervailing duties referred to in recital (4) above, together with the undertaking, are jointly referred to thereafter as ‘measures’.
Protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve iz uvodne izjave 4 ter zaveza se v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj imenujejo „ukrepi“.
The Commission initiated an expiry review investigation of the anti-dumping measures by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [13] on 5 December 2015.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenim 5. decembra 2015 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [13], začela preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka protidampinških ukrepov.
The Commission initiated an expiry review investigation of the countervailing measures by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [14] on 5 December 2015.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenim 5. decembra 2015 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [14], začela preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka izravnalnih ukrepov.
The Commission also initiated a partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [15] on 5 December 2015.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenim 5. decembra 2015 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [15], začela tudi delni vmesni pregled protidampinških in izravnalnih ukrepov.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185 [17], the Commission extended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 on imports of the products concerned originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China to imports of the product concerned consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/185 [17] dokončno protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1238/2013 na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, razširila na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov, poslanih iz Malezije in Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana ali ne.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 [18], the Commission extended the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 on imports of the products concerned originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China to imports of the product concerned consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/184 [18] dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1239/2013 na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, razširila na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov, poslanih iz Malezije in Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana ali ne.
Following the expiry and interim reviews referred to in recitals (10)-(12), the Commission maintained the measures in force by Implementing Regulations (EU) 2017/366 [24] and (EU) 2017/367 [25].
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov in vmesnem pregledu iz uvodnih izjav 10 do 12 je Komisija ohranila veljavne ukrepe z izvedbenima uredbama (EU) 2017/366 [24] in (EU) 2017/367 [25].
The Commission also initiated a partial interim review on the form of measures by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [26] on 3 March 2017.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenim 3. marca 2017 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [26], začela tudi delni vmesni pregled glede oblike ukrepov.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/941 [29], the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for two exporting producers.
Komisija je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2017/941 [29] umaknila svoje sprejetje zaveze za dva proizvajalca izvoznika.
The MIP is set on a cash equivalent basis.
Minimalna uvozna cena je določena na osnovi denarnega ustreznika.
If the payment term is different from the cash equivalent basis, a certain deduction is applied to the invoice value when compliance with the MIP is compared.
Če se plačilni pogoj razlikuje od osnove denarnega ustreznika, se od vrednosti na računu odšteje določen znesek, kadar se preverja skladnost z minimalno uvozno ceno.
The undertaking also obliges the exporting producers to provide the Commission on a quarterly basis with detailed information on all their export sales to the Union (‘the quarterly reports’).
Z zavezo se proizvajalci izvozniki tudi obvezujejo, da bodo Komisiji za vsako četrtletje predložili podrobne informacije o celotnem izvozu v Unijo („četrtletna poročila“).
The reporting also includes reporting of re-sales to the first independent customer in the Union through a related importer listed in the undertaking.
Poročanje vključuje tudi poročanje o nadaljnji prodaji prvi neodvisni stranki v Uniji prek povezanega uvoznika, navedenega v zavezi.
These latter reports enable the Commission to monitor whether the re-sale price of the related importer to the first independent customer is in accordance the MIP.
Ta poročila omogočijo Komisiji, da spremlja, ali je cena nadaljnje prodaje prvi neodvisni stranki s strani povezanega uvoznika v skladu z minimalno uvozno ceno.
This data submitted in these quarterly reports must be complete and correct and the reported transactions should fully comply with the terms of the undertaking.
Ti podatki v teh četrtletnih poročilih morajo biti popolni in pravilni, sporočene transakcije pa morajo biti popolnoma v skladu s pogoji zaveze.
The exporting producer is liable for the breach of any of its related parties, whether or not listed in the undertaking.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je odgovoren za kršitve katere koli od svojih povezanih oseb, ne glede na to, ali so navedene v zavezi ali ne.
The exporting producers also undertook to consult the Commission regarding any difficulties or questions, technical or otherwise, which may arise during the implementation of the undertaking.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so se prav tako zavezali, da se s Komisijo posvetujejo o kakršnih koli težavah ali vprašanjih tehnične ali druge narave, ki se lahko pojavijo med izvajanjem zaveze.
The undertaking also obliges the exporting producers to notify the Commission in due time in case they intend to establish a party in the Union to which they will be related.
Proizvajalci izvozniki morajo poleg tega na podlagi zaveze pravočasno obvestiti Komisijo, če nameravajo v Uniji ustanoviti osebo, s katero bodo povezani.
The undertaking further stipulates that the acceptance of the undertaking by the Commission is based on trust and any action which would harm the relationship of trust established with the Commission should justify the withdrawal of the undertaking.
V zavezi je nadalje določeno, da Komisija sprejme zavezo na podlagi zaupanja, vsako dejanje, ki bi to zaupanje Komisije zlorabilo, pa bi moralo upravičiti umik zaveze.
While monitoring compliance with the undertaking, the Commission verified information submitted by the two exporting producers BLD Solar and Topray Solar that was relevant to the undertaking.
Komisija je med spremljanjem skladnosti z zavezo preverila informacije, ki sta jih predložila dva proizvajalca izvoznika, tj. družbi BLD Solar in Topray Solar, ter so bile relevantne za zavezo.
In addition, the Commission also carried out verification visits at the premises of these exporting producers.
Poleg tega je Komisija izvedla tudi preveritvene obiske v prostorih navedenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
BLD Solar
V času preveritvenega obiska decembra 2016 so računovodski izkazi družbe BLD Solar pokazali, da njene štiri največje domnevno nepovezane stranke še vedno dolgujejo znatne zneske za module, ki so jih kupile od družbe BLD Solar.
At the time of the verification visit in December 2016, BLD Solar's accounts showed that their four biggest allegedly unrelated customers had substantial amounts still due to be paid for modules purchased from BLD Solar.
Ena od strank na primer več kot eno leto po zadnjem nakupu še ni poravnala plačila.
By way of example, one customer had not paid for more than one year after the last purchase.
Neporavnani znesek je znašal več kot 8 % celotne prodaje družbe BLD Solar tej stranki.
The balance still due amounted to more than 8 % of all BLD Solar sales to this customer.
Taka neporavnana plačila predstavljajo „neomejene kredite“ v korist stranke.
Such outstanding payments constitute ‘unlimited credits’ which are benefits to the customer.
Ti niso dovoljeni, ker za te transakcije ni mogoče preveriti skladnosti z minimalno uvozno ceno, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 26.
They are not allowed as compliance with the MIP cannot be verified for these transactions as set out in recital (26).
Družba BLD Solar je izdala veliko število opominov dva dni pred preveritvenim obiskom, domnevno z razlogom, da bi izterjala neporavnana plačila.
BLD Solar had issued a large number of debit notes two days prior to the verification visit, allegedly claiming the outstanding payments.
Nobeden od teh opominov ni bil vnesen v računovodske izkaze.
None of these debit notes had been entered into the accounts.
Poleg tega se družba BLD Solar o tem vprašanju v nasprotju z obveznostmi iz uvodne izjave 31 ni posvetovala s Komisijo.
In addition, BLD Solar failed to consult the Commission on this issue contrary to the obligations set out in recital (31).
Družba BLD Solar je plačala znaten znesek eni od štirih strank iz uvodne izjave 37.
BLD Solar paid a substantial amount to one of the four customers mentioned in recital (37).
Ta korist predstavlja kompenzacijski dogovor.
This benefit constitutes a compensatory arrangement.
Poleg tega se o plačilu ni poročalo.
In addition, the payment was not reported.
Komisija je analizirala posledice te koristi in sklenila, da je družba BLD Solar kršila svojo obveznost, v skladu s katero naj ne bi sklepala kompenzacijskih dogovorov, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 27.
The Commission analysed the implications of this benefit and concluded that BLD Solar had breached its obligation not to enter into compensatory arrangements, as mentioned in recital (27).
Poleg tega je družba BLD Solar kršila obveznosti o poročanju iz uvodne izjave 29, ker o tej koristi ni poročala.
Moreover, by not reporting this benefit, BLD breached the reporting obligations referred to in recital (29).
Glede na javno dostopne informacije je imela družba BLD Solar poslovne prostore v Uniji na istem naslovu kot ena od njenih strank iz uvodne izjave 37.
According to publicly available information, BLD Solar had an office in the Union sharing the same address with one of its customers mentioned in recital (37).
Družba BLD Solar je trdila, da je šlo v tem primeru za nerealizirano poslovno sodelovanje.
BLD Solar claimed this being unrealised business cooperation.
Še ena od štirih strank iz uvodne izjave 37 je objavila spletišče, ki je skoraj enako spletišču družbe BLD Solar, vključno z enakimi jezikovnimi napakami.
Another one out of the four customers mentioned in recital (37) published a website which is nearly identical with BLD Solar's site, including the same linguistic errors.
Komisija je odkrila tudi, da je družba BLD Solar knjižila prodajo dvema uvoznikoma na skupni račun iste stranke.
The Commission also found that BLD accounted the sales to two importers under a joint customer account.
Vendar pa je družba BLD Solar v svojih četrtletnih poročilih za Komisijo ti stranki navedla kot ločena subjekta, zaradi česar je pod vprašaj postavljena pravilnost poročil, kakor je navedena v uvodni izjavi 29.
In its quarterly reports to the Commission, however, BLD declared these customers as different entities, hence putting into question the correctness of the reports, as referred to in recital (29).
Poleg tega je družba BLD Solar predložila nasprotujoče si razlage glede poslovnega razmerja z eno od teh strank, ki je povezana s kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katerega zaveza ne velja.
In addition, BLD gave contradictory explanations regarding the business relationship with one of these customers which is related to a Chinese exporting producer not subject to the undertaking.
Komisija je analizirala odkritja iz uvodnih izjav 39 in 40 ter sklenila, da so ta zlorabila njeno zaupanje.
In addition the Commission concluded that the findings set out in recitals (37) and (38) BLD Solar breached the terms of the undertaking, as described in recitals (26), (27), (29) and (31).
Poleg modulov je družba Topray Solar prodala velike količine tako imenovanih potrošniških izdelkov, kot so solarni vodnjaki in aktovke s polnilnikom.
Topray Solar
Ti izdelki niso zajeti z zavezo.
In addition to modules, Topray Solar sold big quantities of so-called consumer products like solar fountains and briefcase chargers.
Za te izdelke se račun na podlagi zaveze ne bi smel izdati.
These products are not covered by the undertaking.
Vendar pa je družba Topray Solar enostransko opredelila te izdelke kot izdelke, ki jih zaveza zajema, in istim strankam izdala račune na podlagi zaveze, ki so vsebovali oboje: izdelke, ki jih zaveza zajema, in izdelke, ki jih zaveza ne zajema.
No undertaking invoice should be issued for these products.
Razen tega je vrednost izdelka, ki ga zaveza ne zajema, presegala omejitev vzporedne prodaje istim strankam.
However, Topray Solar unilaterally defined these products as product covered by the undertaking and issued undertaking invoices to the same customers which contained both: products covered and products non-covered by the undertaking.
Poleg tega se družba Topray Solar v nasprotju z obveznostmi iz uvodne izjave 31 ni posvetovala s Komisijo.
Moreover, the value of the product not covered by the undertaking was in excess of the parallel sales limit to the same customers.
Razen prodaje iz uvodne izjave 43 je družba Topray Solar prodajala dodatne izdelke, ki jih zaveza ne zajema (npr. solarne regulatorje polnjenja), istim strankam ne da bi o tej prodaji poročala Komisiji.
In addition, Topray Solar did not consult the Commission contrary to the obligations set out in recital (31).
Ta prodaja je nadalje povečala prekoračitev omejitve vzporedne prodaje iz uvodne izjave 43 in pomeni kršitev obveznosti o poročanju iz uvodne izjave 29.
Apart from the sales referred to in recital (43), Topray Solar sold additional products not covered by the undertaking (e.g. solar charge controllers) to the same customers without reporting these sales to the Commission.
Komisija je analizirala posledice tega vzorca trgovanja in ugotovila, da obstaja visoko tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije minimalne uvozne cene, in sicer če se izdelki, ki so zajeti v zavezi, in tisti, ki niso zajeti, prodajajo istim strankam in je pri tem prekoračena omejitev vzporedne prodaje.
These sales further increased the parallel sales limit excess referred to in recital (43) and constitute a breach of the reporting obligations referred to in recital (29).
Komisija je ugotovila, da je zaradi ugotovljenega vzorca trgovanja spremljanje zaveze družbe Topray Solar praktično neizvedljivo.
The Commission analysed the implications of this pattern of trade and concluded that there is a high risk of cross-compensation of the MIP, namely if products covered and products not covered are sold to the same customers in excess of the parallel sales limit.
Družba Topray Solar je prav tako prodala znatne količine izdelkov, ki jih zaveza ne zajema (npr. solarnih regulatorjev polnjenja) svojemu povezanemu uvozniku v Uniji.