natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz barijevega karbonata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Following an anti-dumping investigation (‘the original investigation’), the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 1175/2005 [2], a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’ or ‘China’ or ‘country concerned’).
Svet je po protidampinški preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) z Uredbo (ES) št. 1175/2005 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz barijevega karbonata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „Kitajska“ ali „zadevna država“).
The measures took the form of a specific duty of 6,30 EUR/tonne and 8,10 EUR/tonne for two Chinese exporting producers with an individual duty rate and 56,40 EUR/tonne for all other exporting producers in China.
Ukrepi so bili v obliki posebne dajatve v višini 6,30 EUR/tono in 8,10 EUR/tono za dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika z individualno stopnjo dajatve in 56,40 EUR/tono za vse druge proizvajalce izvoznike na Kitajskem.
In August 2011, following an expiry review (‘the previous expiry review’), the measures were extended for a period of five years by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 831/2011 [3].
Avgusta 2011 so bili ukrepi po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa („prejšnji pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa“) podaljšani za petletno obdobje z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 831/2011 [3].
Following the publication of a notice of the impending expiry of the anti-dumping measures in force [4], the Commission received on 12 May 2016 a request for the initiation of an expiry review of these measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation (‘the request’).
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov [4] 12. maja 2016 prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe („zahtevek“).
The request was lodged by Solvay & CPC Barium Strontium GmbH & Co.
Zahtevek je vložila družba Solvay & CPC Barium Strontium GmbH & Co.
KG, Germany (‘the applicant’), the sole Union producer of barium carbonate, thus representing 100 % of the total Union production.
KG iz Nemčije („vložnik“), edini proizvajalec barijevega karbonata v Uniji, ki torej predstavlja celotno skupno proizvodnjo Unije.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the definitive anti-dumping measures would likely result in the continuation of dumping and injury.
Zahtevek je temeljil na izhodišču, da bi iztek dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje dampinga in škode.
Having determined, after consulting the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 18 August 2016, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5] (‘the Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review in accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetovanju z odborom, ustanovljenim s členom 15(1) osnovne uredbe, ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, in je 18. avgusta 2016 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the applicant, known exporting producers, the authorities of the PRC, known importers and users known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je o začetku preiskave izrecno obvestila vložnika, znane proizvajalce izvoznike, kitajske organe, znane uvoznike in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter jih pozvala k sodelovanju.
Interested parties had an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings within the time limits set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da v rokih iz obvestila o začetku pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje pred Komisijo in/ali pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih.
In the Notice of Initiation, in relation to imports from the PRC, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged India as a market economy third country (‘analogue country’) within the meaning of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation and invited them to comment on this choice.
Komisija je v zvezi z uvozom iz LRK v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da namerava uporabiti Indijo kot tretjo državo s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“) v smislu člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe, in jih pozvala, naj podajo pripombe v zvezi s to izbiro.
No comments were received in this respect.
Prejela ni nobenih pripomb.
The Commission contacted the Indian authorities and the known producers of barium carbonate in India and invited them to cooperate.
Komisija je stopila v stik z indijskimi organi in znanimi proizvajalci barijevega karbonata v Indiji ter jih pozvala k sodelovanju.
None of the producers in India cooperated by supplying the requested information.
Nobeden od proizvajalcev v Indiji ni sodeloval s predložitvijo zahtevanih informacij.
In parallel, the Commission sought cooperation of known producers in other potential analogue countries and also contacted the relevant authorities in Brazil, Iran, the Republic of Korea and the USA, inviting them to provide the names and addresses of producers' associations and producers that are known to produce and sell barium carbonate on their market.
Komisija je hkrati za sodelovanje zaprosila znane proizvajalce v drugih možnih primerljivih državah, v stik pa je stopila tudi z zadevnimi organi v Braziliji, Iranu, Republiki Koreji in ZDA ter jih pozvala, naj ji posredujejo nazive in naslove združenj proizvajalcev in proizvajalcev, za katere je znano, da proizvajajo in prodajajo barijev karbonat na njihovem trgu.
However, no producer from these countries was willing to cooperate.
Vendar nobeden od proizvajalcev v teh državah ni bil pripravljen sodelovati.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known exporting producers in the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se lahko Komisija odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse znane proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK pozvala, naj predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
No Chinese exporting producer came forward.
Javil se ni noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik.
Sampling was thus not necessary.
Zato vzorčenje ni bilo potrebno.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission contacted all known unrelated importers and asked them to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se lahko Komisija odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi lahko v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, je stopila v stik z vsemi znanimi nepovezanimi uvozniki in jih pozvala, naj predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
Six importers came forward, identified themselves, and provided the Commission with the information requested in the Notice of Initiation.
Odzvalo se je šest uvoznikov, ki so Komisiji predložili informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
In view of the small number of importers, the Commission chose not to select a sample and sent the questionnaire to all six importers who identified themselves.
Komisija se je zaradi majhnega števila uvoznikov odločila, da ne bo izbrala vzorca, in poslala vprašalnik vsem šestim uvoznikom, ki so se odzvali.
However, as set out in recital 19 below, none of these importers replied to the questionnaire.
Vendar kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (19), nobeden od teh uvoznikov ni odgovoril na vprašalnik.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the sole Union producer, to the 6 importers and the 86 users that came forward, to all 4 known Chinese exporting producers and to 20 known producers in potential analogue countries (18 in India, 1 in Iran and 1 in the USA).
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala edinemu proizvajalcu Unije, šestim uvoznikom in 86 uporabnikom, ki so se odzvali, vsem štirim znanim kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom in 20 znanim proizvajalcem v možnih primerljivih državah (18 v Indiji, enemu v Iranu in enemu v ZDA).
Questionnaire replies were received from the sole Union producer and 15 users.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali edini proizvajalec Unije in 15 uporabnikov.
None of the Chinese exporting producers and none of the producers in the potential analogue countries cooperated.
Sodeloval ni noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik in noben proizvajalec iz možnih primerljivih držav.
Likewise, and while they identified themselves initially, as set out in recital 16 above, none of the importers that came forward replied to the questionnaire that was subsequently sent by the Commission.
Podobno tudi nobeden od uvoznikov, ki so se prvotno odzvali, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (16), ni predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika, ki ga je nato poslala Komisija.
Union producer
Proizvajalec Unije
KG, Germany.
KG, Nemčija.
Esmalglass, S.A.U, Villareal, Spain,
Esmalglass, S.A.U, Villareal, Španija;
Torrecid, S.A, L'Alcora, Spain,
Torrecid, S.A, L'Alcora, Španija;
BorsodChem Zrt, Kazincbarcika, Hungary.
BorsodChem Zrt, Kazincbarcika, Madžarska.
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava v zvezi z verjetnostjo nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga je zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2015 do 30. junija 2016 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je potekalo v obdobju od 1. januarja 2013 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product under review is barium carbonate with a strontium content of more than 0,07 % by weight and a sulphur content of more than 0,0015 % whether in powder, pressed granular or calcined granular form (the product under review), originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN code ex28366000 (TARIC code 2836600010).
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je barijev karbonat, z vsebnostjo stroncija več kot 0,07 mas. % in vsebnostjo žvepla več kot 0,0015 mas. %, bodisi v obliki prahu, stisnjenih granul ali žganih granul („izdelek, ki se pregleduje“), s poreklom iz LRK, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex28366000 (oznaka TARIC 2836600010).
Barium carbonate is used as a raw material for several industries.
Barijev karbonat se kot surovina uporablja v več panogah.
It is primarily used in the production of ceramic frits and glazes, brick and tiles, special purpose glasses, and in the chemical industry
Uporablja se zlasti pri proizvodnji keramičnih frit in glazur, opeke in ploščic, stekla za posebne namene in v kemični industriji.
The investigation showed that the following products have the same physical and chemical characteristics as well as the same basic uses:
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo naslednji izdelki enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe:
the product under review,
izdelek, ki se pregleduje;
the product produced and sold on the domestic market of the PRC, and
izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu LRK, in
The Commission concluded therefore that these products are like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da so ti izdelki podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was taking place during the review investigation period and whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali je bil damping prisoten v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom in ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping zaradi izteka veljavnosti obstoječih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
As mentioned in recital 14 none of the Chinese exporting producers cooperated in this investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (14), v tej preiskavi ni sodeloval noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik.
Therefore, the Commission informed the Chinese authorities that in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation facts available may be used with regard to the Chinese exporting producer in order to determine whether dumping is currently taking place and the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping.
Komisija je zato kitajske organe obvestila, da se lahko v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe za kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika uporabijo dostopna dejstva, da bi se ugotovilo, ali je damping trenutno prisoten in ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo nadaljeval ali ponovil.
The Commission did not receive any comments or requests for an intervention of the Hearing Officer from the Chinese authorities in this regard.
V zvezi s tem od kitajskih organov ni prejela nobenih pripomb ali zahtevkov za posredovanje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje.
On this basis, in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, the findings in relation to the existence of dumping and the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping set out below were based on facts available, in particular:
Na podlagi tega in v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe so ugotovitve v zvezi z obstojem dampinga in verjetnostjo nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga, navedene v nadaljevanju, temeljile na dostopnih dejstvih, zlasti na:
information contained in the request;
informacijah iz zahtevka;
Eurostat statistics and the data reported to the Commission by the Member States pursuant to Article 14(6) of the basic Regulation (‘Article 14(6) database’);
statističnih podatkih Eurostata in podatkih, ki so jih države članice sporočile Komisiji v skladu s členom 14(6) osnovne uredbe („zbirka podatkov iz člena 14(6)“);
publicly available statistics of the Chinese Export Statistics and COMTRADE [6] Database; and
javno dostopnih statističnih podatkih iz kitajske zbirke statističnih podatkov o izvozu in iz zbirke podatkov COMTRADE [6] ter
publicly-available information [7].
javno dostopnih informacijah [7].
Exporting producers who have been granted market economy treatment in the original investigation
Proizvajalci izvozniki, ki jim je bila v prvotni preiskavi odobrena tržnogospodarska obravnava
Two exporting producers were granted market economy treatment (‘MET’) in the original investigation.
V prvotni preiskavi je bila tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“) odobrena dvema proizvajalcema izvoznikoma.
In accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, due to a lack of cooperation, the normal value for these exporting producers was, accordingly, based on facts available.
V skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe je zaradi nesodelovanja normalna vrednost za ta proizvajalca izvoznika zato temeljila na dostopnih dejstvih.
The normal value was established on the basis of Chinese export prices to other third country markets with no anti-dumping measures in place as recorded in the Chinese Export Statistics Database in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost se je v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe določila na podlagi kitajskih izvoznih cen za trge drugih tretjih držav brez vzpostavljenih protidampinških ukrepov, kot so zabeležene v kitajski zbirki statističnih podatkov o izvozu.
This was considered the most reasonable methodology given the lack of other information available due to the lack of cooperation.
Ker zaradi nesodelovanja ni bilo na voljo drugih informacij, se je ta metodologija štela za najprimernejšo.
In the absence of cooperation of any Chinese exporting producer, the export price was based on the Article 14(6) database for imports to the Union of the product under review during the review investigation period by the two Chinese exporting producers who were granted MET during the original investigation.
Ker v preiskavi ni sodeloval noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, je izvozna cena temeljila na zbirki podatkov iz člena 14(6) za uvoz izdelka, ki se pregleduje, v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom v Unijo za kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika, ki jima je bila v prvotni preiskavi odobrena TGO.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price thus established on an ex-works basis.
Komisija je primerjala normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno, določeno na podlagi franko tovarna.
For the purpose of a fair comparison, the export price and the normal value were adjusted for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Da bi se zagotovila poštena primerjava, sta se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe izvozna cena in normalna vrednost prilagodili za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
Adjustments were made for ocean freight, handling costs and inland freight based on publicly available information and information in the request in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Opravljene so bile prilagoditve za oceanski prevoz, manipulativne stroške in notranji prevoz na podlagi javno dostopnih informacij in informacij v zahtevku v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
On this basis, the weighted average dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid was around 30 % for Hubei Jingshan Chutian Barium Salt Corp. Ltd and around 20 % for Zaozhuang Yongli Chemical Co.
Na podlagi tega je tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije, brez plačane dajatve, znašala približno 30 % za družbo Hubei Jingshan Chutian Barium Salt Corp.
Exporting producers who have not been granted market economy treatment during the original investigation
Ltd. in približno 20 % za družbo Zaozhuang Yongli Chemical Co.
For those Chinese exporting producers who were not granted MET in the original investigation normal value should be established according to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of the price or constructed value in an appropriate market economy third country (the ‘analogue country’).
Proizvajalci izvozniki, ki jim v prvotni preiskavi ni bila odobrena tržnogospodarska obravnava
India was selected as analogue country in the previous expiry review.
Normalno vrednost za kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim v prvotni preiskavi TGO ni bila odobrena, je treba določiti v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe, tj. na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v ustrezni tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“).
Therefore, in the Notice of Initiation of the present review, the Commission proposed to use India again as analogue country and invited interested parties to comment.
V prejšnjem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa je bila za primerljivo državo izbrana Indija.
As mentioned in recital 10 the Commission also sought cooperation of other potential analogue countries, i.e. Brazil, Iran, the Republic of Korea and the USA, by inviting known producers to provide the necessary information.
Zato je Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku sedanjega pregleda predlagala, naj se kot primerljiva država znova uporabi Indija, in zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe.
However, none of the producers from these countries agreed to cooperate with the proceeding.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (10), je Komisija za sodelovanje zaprosila tudi druge možne primerljive države, tj. Brazilijo, Iran, Republiko Korejo in ZDA, in sicer je znane proizvajalce pozvala, naj predložijo potrebne informacije.
There were no indications for any other country where the production of barium carbonate could take place.
Vendar v sodelovanje v postopku ni privolil noben proizvajalec iz teh držav.
Given the abovedescribed non-cooperation from producers in any of the potential analogue countries, the Commission determined normal value on any other reasonable basis in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Za druge države ni bilo nobenih dokazov glede morebitne proizvodnje barijevega karbonata.
The normal value in this regard was established on the basis of the average cost of manufacturing of the Union industry by adding an amount for selling, general and administrative costs (‘SG&A’) and profits.
Komisija je zaradi opisanega nesodelovanja proizvajalcev iz možnih primerljivih držav normalno vrednost določila na kateri koli drugi razumni osnovi v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
SG&A were based on the actual SG&A of the Union industry pertaining to the production and sale of the like product on the Union market, while profits were based on the profits pertaining to production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation used per analogy.
Normalna vrednost v tem smislu se je določila na podlagi povprečnih stroškov proizvodnje industrije Unije, ki se jim je prištel znesek prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih stroškov ter znesek dobičkov.
Export price
Prodajni, splošni in upravni stroški so temeljili na dejanskih prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih stroških industrije Unije, ki so se nanašali na proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka na trgu Unije, dobički pa so temeljili na dobičkih, ki so se nanašali na proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe in so se uporabili po analogiji.
Due to the non-cooperation from the Chinese exporting producers, export prices were established in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of the Article 14(6) database for imports made to the Union during the review investigation period by those Chinese exporting producers who were not granted MET during the original investigation.
Izvozna cena
Where justified for the purpose of a fair comparison, the export price and the normal value were adjusted for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozna cena je bila zaradi nesodelovanja kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov določena v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe, tj. na podlagi zbirke podatkov iz člena 14(6) za uvoz v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom v Unijo za tiste kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim v prvotni preiskavi TGO ni bila odobrena.
On this basis the weighted average dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the cost, insurance, freight (‘CIF’) Union frontier price, duty unpaid was more than 100 %.
Kadar je bilo to upravičeno za zagotovitev poštene primerjave, sta se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe izvozna cena in normalna vrednost prilagodili za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
Development of imports should measures be repealed
Na podlagi tega je tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene stroškov, zavarovanja in prevoznine („CIF“) meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, znašala več kot 100 %.
Further to the finding of dumping during the review investigation period, the Commission analysed whether there was a likelihood of a continuation of dumping, should the measures be repealed.
Razvoj uvoza v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov