natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In that respect, the import of processed petfood derived from fishery by-products is subject to stricter conditions than the import of raw petfood derived from fishery by-products.
Zato za uvoz predelane hrane za hišne živali, pridobljene iz ribiških stranskih proizvodov, veljajo strožji pogoji kot za uvoz surove hrane za hišne živali, pridobljene iz ribiških stranskih proizvodov.
It is appropriate to authorise the import of processed petfood derived from fishery by-products from all non-EU countries authorised for the import raw petfood derived from fishery by-products.
Ustrezno je dovoliti uvoz predelane hrane za hišne živali, pridobljene iz ribiških stranskih proizvodov iz vseh tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz surove hrane za hišne živali, pridobljene iz ribiških stranskih proizvodov.
Table 2 of Section 1 of Chapter II of Annex XIV to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Preglednico 2 oddelka1 poglavja II Priloge XIV k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The export of processed manure destined for incineration or disposal in a landfill is prohibited.
Izvoz predelanega gnoja, namenjenega sežiganju ali odlaganju na odlagališču, je prepovedan.
However, in accordance with Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 the export of that material for use in biogas or composting plants may be allowed provided that the country of destination is a member of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Vendar se v skladu s členom 43(2) in (3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1069/2009 izvoz te snovi za uporabo v objektih za pridelavo bioplina ali kompostiranje lahko dovoli pod pogojem, da je namembna država članica Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD).
In order to allow the export of processed manure and organic fertilizers containing solely processed manure, it is appropriate to lay down the rules for the export of those products for purposes other than incineration, landfill, or use in biogas or composting plants in the countries which are not members of OECD.
Da bi se omogočil izvoz predelanega gnoja in organskih gnojil, ki vsebujejo izključno predelan gnoj, je primerno, da se določijo pravila za izvoz teh proizvodov za namene, ki niso sežig, odlaganje na odlagališčih ali uporaba v objektih za pridelavo bioplina ali kompostiranje v državah, ki niso članice OECD.
Those rules should set out requirements at least equivalent to the requirements for the placing on the market of processed manure and organic fertilizers containing solely processed manure.
V teh pravilih bi bilo treba določiti zahteve, ki so vsaj enakovredne zahtevam za dajanje na trg predelanega gnoja in organskih gnojil, ki vsebujejo izključno predelan gnoj.
Annex XIV to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zato bi bilo treba v skladu s tem spremeniti Prilogo XIV k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011.
In Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, the following paragraph is added:
V členu 25 Uredbe (EU) št. 142/2011 se doda naslednji odstavek:
The rules set out in Chapter V of Annex XIV shall apply to exports from the Union of the derived products specified therein.’.
Pravila, določena v poglavju V Priloge XIV, se uporabljajo za izvoz pridobljenih proizvodov, opredeljenih v navedem poglavju, iz Unije.“
Annexes V and XIV to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 are amended in accordance with the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Prilogi V in XIV k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 se spremenita v skladu z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Commission Decision 2006/766/EC of 6 November 2006 establishing the lists of third countries and territories from which imports of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates, marine gastropods and fishery products are permitted (OJ L 320, 18.11.2006, p.
Odločba Komisije 2006/766/ES z dne 6. novembra 2006 o določitvi seznamov tretjih držav in ozemelj, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz školjk, iglokožcev, plaščarjev, morskih polžev in ribiških proizvodov (UL L 320, 18.11.2006, str.
Annexes V and XIV to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 are amended as follows:
Prilogi V in XIV k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 se spremenita:
in Annex V, Chapter III, Section 3, point 2 is replaced by the following:
Točka 2 oddelka 3 poglavja III Priloge V se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Digestion residues or compost other than those referred to in point 3(b) of Section 2, which do not comply with the requirements set out in this Section, shall be resubmitted to transformation or composting, and in the case of Salmonella handled or disposed of in accordance with the instructions of the competent authority.’;
Presnovni ostanki ali kompost, razen tistih iz točke 3(b) oddelka 2, ki niso skladni z zahtevami iz tega oddelka, se ponovno predelajo v bioplin ali kompost, pri salmoneli pa se z njimi ravna in jih odstrani v skladu z navodili pristojnega organa.“
in Chapter II, Section 1, in Table 2, row number 12 is replaced by the following:
Vrstica št. 12 preglednice 2 v oddelku 1 poglavja II se nadomesti z naslednjim:
In the case of processed petfood and of dogchews: materials referred to in Article 35(a)(i) and (ii).
V primeru predelane hrane za hišne živali in pasjih žvečilk: snovi iz člena 35(a)(i) in (ii);
In the case of raw petfood: materials referred to in Article 35(a)(iii).
v primeru surove hrane za hišne živali: snovi iz člena 35(a)(iii).
The petfood and the dogchews must have been produced in accordance with Chapter II of Annex XIII.
Hrana za hišne živali in pasje žvečilke morajo biti proizvedene v skladu s poglavjem II Priloge XIII.
In the case of raw petfood:
V primeru surove hrane za hišne živali:
Third countries listed in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 or in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008, from which Member States authorise imports of fresh meat from the same species and where only bone-in meat is authorised.
tretje države, navedene v delu 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010 ali v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 798/2008, iz katerih države članice dovolijo uvoz svežega mesa, pridobljenega iz istih vrst živali, in v katerih je dovoljeno le meso s kostmi;
In the case of fish materials, third countries listed in Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC.
v primeru snovi, pridobljenih iz rib, tretje države, navedene v Prilogi II k Odločbi 2006/766/ES;
Third countries listed in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010, and the following countries:
tretje države, navedene v delu 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010, in naslednje države:
In the case of processed petfood derived from fish materials, third countries listed in Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC.
V primeru predelane hrane za hišne živali, pridobljene iz rib, tretje države, navedene v Prilogi II k Odločbi 2006/766/ES.
In the case of canned petfood: Annex XV, Chapter 3(A).
V primeru konzervirane hrane za hišne živali: poglavje 3(A) Priloge XV;
In the case of processed petfood other than canned petfood: Annex XV, Chapter 3(B).
v primeru predelane hrane za hišne živali, razen konzervirane hrane za hišne živali: poglavje 3(B) Priloge XV;
In the case of dogchews: Annex XV, Chapter 3(C).
v primeru pasjih žvečilk: poglavje 3(C) Priloge XV;
In the case of raw petfood: Annex XV, Chapter 3(D).’
v primeru surove hrane za hišne živali: poglavje 3(D) Priloge XV.“
the following Chapter V is added:
doda se naslednje poglavje V:
RULES FOR THE EXPORT OF CERTAIN DERIVED PRODUCTS
PRAVILA ZA IZVOZ NEKATERIH PRIDOBLJENIH PROIZVODOV
Rules applicable to the export of the derived products listed below as referred to in Article 25(4):
Pravila, ki veljajo za izvoz pridobljenih proizvodov s seznama v nadaljevanju, kot so navedeni v členu 25(4):
Derived products
Pridobljeni proizvodi
Rules for export
Pravila za izvoz
Processed manure and organic fertilizers, compost or digestion residues from biogas transformation containing no other animal by-products or derived products than processed manure
Predelan gnoj in organska gnojila, kompost ali presnovni ostanki iz predelave v bioplin, ki ne vsebujejo drugih živalskih stranskih proizvodov ali pridobljenih proizvodov, razen predelanega gnoja.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/173
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/173
amending Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011, as regards the name of the holder of the authorisation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 and Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1292/2008 in Izvedbene Uredbe (EU) št. 887/2011 glede imena imetnika dovoljenja za pripravka Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 in Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515
Norel SA has submitted an application in accordance with Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 proposing to change the name of the holder of the authorisation as regards Commission Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 [2] and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011 [3].
Družba Norel SA je v skladu s členom 13(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 predložila zahtevek za spremembo imena imetnika dovoljenja iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1292/2008 [2] in Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 887/2011 [3].
The applicant has submitted relevant data supporting its request.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane je bila o zahtevku obveščena.
The proposed change of the authorisation holder is purely administrative in nature and does not entail a fresh assessment of the additives concerned.
Da bi se družbi Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH omogočilo, da izkorišča svoje pravice trženja, je treba spremeniti pogoje zadevnih dovoljenj.
The European Food Safety Authority was informed of the application.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1292/2008 in Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 887/2011 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In order to allow Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH to exploit its marketing rights, it is necessary to change the terms of the respective authorisations.
Ker ni varnostnih razlogov, ki bi zahtevali takojšnjo uporabo sprememb Uredbe (ES) št. 1292/2008 in Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 887/2011, uvedenih s to uredbo, je ustrezno zagotoviti prehodno obdobje, v katerem se lahko porabijo obstoječe zaloge.
Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
Since safety reasons do not require the immediate application of the amendments made by this Regulation to Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011, it is appropriate to provide for a transitional period during which existing stocks may be used up.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1292/2008
Article 1
V stolpcu 2 Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 1292/2008 se izraz „Norel SA“ nadomesti z izrazom „Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH“.
Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008
Člen 2
In column 2 of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 the term ‘Norel SA’ is replaced by the term ‘Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH’.
Sprememba Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 887/2011
Article 2
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 887/2011 se spremeni:
Amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011
v naslovu se izraz „Norel SA“ nadomesti z izrazom „Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH“;
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011 is amended as follows:
v stolpcu 2 Priloge se izraz „Norel SA“ nadomesti z izrazom „Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH“.
in the title, the term ‘Norel SA’ is replaced by the term ‘Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH’;
Člen 3
in column 2 of the Annex, the term ‘Norel SA’ is replaced by the term ‘Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH’.
Prehodni ukrepi
Article 3
Obstoječe zaloge dodatkov, ki so v skladu z določbami, ki so se uporabljale pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, se lahko še naprej dajejo na trg in uporabljajo do porabe zalog.
Existing stocks of the additives which are in conformity with the provisions applying before the date of entry into force of this Regulation may continue to be placed on the market and used until they are exhausted.
Začetek veljavnosti
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 1. februarja 2017
This Regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Za Komisijo
The President
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1292/2008 z dne 18. decembra 2008 o izdaji dovoljenja za pripravek Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 (Ecobiol in Ecobiol plus) kot krmni dodatek (UL L 340, 19.12.2008, str. 36).
OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 887/2011 z dne 5. septembra 2011 o izdaji dovoljenja za pripravek Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 kot krmni dodatek za piščance za pitanje (imetnik dovoljenja je družba Norel SA) (UL L 229, 6.9.2011, str. 7).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1292/2008 of 18 December 2008 concerning the authorisation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 (Ecobiol and Ecobiol plus) as a feed additive (OJ L 340, 19.12.2008, p. 36).
Vložnik trdi, da je družba Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH od družbe Norel SA pridobila pravice trženja za krmna dodatka Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 in Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 z učinkom od 4. julija 2016.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 887/2011 of 5 September 2011 concerning the authorisation of a preparation of Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 as feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation Norel SA) (OJ L 229, 6.9.2011, p. 7).
Vložnik je predložil ustrezne podatke, ki podpirajo njegovo zahtevo.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/174
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/174
supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for benchmarking portfolio assessment standards and assessment-sharing procedures
o dopolnitvi Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z regulativnimi tehničnimi standardi za določitev standardov za ocenjevanje referenčnih portfeljev in postopkov za izmenjavo ocen
Having regard to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC [1], and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 78(7) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o dostopu do dejavnosti kreditnih institucij in bonitetnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij, spremembi Direktive 2002/87/ES in razveljavitvi direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 78(7) Direktive,
It is necessary to lay down standards for the assessment by competent authorities of the internal approaches adopted by institutions' calculating own funds requirements and set out detailed rules in respect of the procedures for sharing of those assessments between competent authorities empowered to monitor the range of risk-weighted exposure amounts or own funds requirements by institutions permitted to use internal approaches for the calculation of those amounts or own fund requirements.
Določiti je treba standarde, na podlagi katerih pristojni organi ocenjujejo notranje pristope, ki so jih institucije sprejele za izračunavanje kapitalskih zahtev, in opredeliti podrobna pravila v zvezi s postopki za izmenjavo teh ocen med pristojnimi organi, pooblaščenimi za spremljanje razpona zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti ali kapitalskih zahtev institucij, ki lahko uporabljajo notranje pristope za izračun teh zneskov ali kapitalskih zahtev.
The assessment of the quality of advanced approaches of institutions allows for the comparison of internal approaches at the Union level, whereby the European Banking Authority (EBA) assists competent authorities with their assessment of potential underestimation of own funds requirements.
Ocena kakovosti naprednih pristopov institucij omogoča primerjavo notranjih pristopov na ravni Unije, pri čemer Evropski bančni organ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EBA) pomaga pristojnim organom pri njihovi oceni glede morebitne podcenjenosti kapitalskih zahtev.
The rules on the procedures for sharing assessments should contain appropriate provisions on the timing of the sharing of the assessments with the relevant competent authorities and EBA.
Pravila o postopkih za izmenjavo ocen bi morala vsebovati ustrezne določbe glede časovnega okvira izmenjave ocen z zadevnimi pristojnimi organi in EBA.
Competent authorities responsible for the supervision of institutions belonging to a group subject to consolidated supervision have a legitimate interest in the quality of internal approaches used by those institutions, as they contribute to the joint decision of the approval of the internal approaches in the first place, by virtue of Article 20 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
Pristojnim organom, odgovornim za nadzor institucij, ki so del skupine, za katero se izvaja konsolidiran nadzor, je upravičeno v interesu, da so notranji pristopi, ki jih uporabljajo te institucije, kakovostni, saj prispevajo k skupni odločitvi o odobritvi notranjih pristopov na podlagi člena 20 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2].
Rules on the procedures for sharing assessments made in accordance with Article 78(3) of Directive 2013/36/EU should also specify how the general cooperation and information-sharing obligations within colleges apply in the particular context of the benchmarking exercise.
Pravila o postopkih za izmenjavo ocen, pripravljenih v skladu s členom 78(3) Direktive 2013/36/EU, bi morala tudi določati, kako se uporabljajo splošne obveznosti glede sodelovanja in izmenjave informacij v kolegijih v specifičnem okviru postopka primerjanja.
In order to ensure that the assessments made in accordance with Article 78(3) of Directive 2013/36/EU are shared in an efficient and practicable manner, competent authorities should make known their estimate or views on the level of potential underestimation of own fund requirements stemming from the internal approaches used by the institutions and the reasoning behind the conclusions of the competent authorities' assessment.
Da bi se zagotovilo, da se ocene, izvedene v skladu s členom 78(3) Direktive 2013/36/EU, izmenjujejo na učinkovit in praktičen način, bi morali pristojni organi sporočiti svojo oceno ali mnenja glede ravni morebitne podcenjenosti kapitalskih zahtev, ki izhaja iz uporabe notranjih pristopov s strani institucij, ter utemeljitev za sklepe pristojnih organov pri njihovi oceni.
In addition, actual or envisaged corrective actions by competent authorities in accordance with Article 78(4) of that Directive are also relevant for all other competent authorities responsible for the supervision of institutions belonging to a group subject to consolidated supervision as they have a legitimate interest in the continuous quality of an internal approach used by those institutions.
Poleg tega so dejanski ali predvideni popravni ukrepi pristojnih organov v skladu s členom 78(4) navedene direktive relevantni tudi za vse druge pristojne organe, odgovorne za nadzor institucij iz skupine, za katero se izvaja konsolidiran nadzor, saj jim je upravičeno v interesu, da je notranji pristop, ki ga uporabljajo navedene institucije, vedno kakovosten.
Furthermore, actual or envisaged corrective actions by competent authorities should also be made known to EBA in accordance with Article 107(1) of that Directive, as they are necessary for EBA to carry out its tasks.
Dejanski ali predvideni popravni ukrepi pristojnih organov bi morali biti tudi sporočeni EBA v skladu s členom 107(1) navedene direktive, saj jih EBA potrebuje za izvajanje svojih nalog.
The EBA report produced to assist competent authorities in their assessment of the quality of the internal approaches is a cornerstone of the benchmarking exercise, given that such report contains the results of the comparison of relevant institutions with their peers at the Union level.
Poročilo EBA, ki ga ta pripravi za pomoč pristojnim organom pri oceni kakovosti notranjih pristopov, je temeljni element postopka primerjanja, saj tako poročilo vsebuje rezultate primerjave zadevnih institucij s primerljivimi institucijami na ravni Unije.
Therefore, the information contained in the EBA report should constitute the basis on which competent authorities decide which firms and portfolios should be assessed with ‘particular attention’ as required by the first subparagraph of Article 78(3) of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Zato bi morale informacije, vsebovane v poročilu EBA, predstavljati podlago, na kateri se pristojni organi odločijo, katerim podjetjem in portfeljem bi bilo treba pri oceni nameniti „posebno pozornost“, kot se zahteva v prvem pododstavku člena 78(3) Direktive 2013/36/EU.
The results of the assessment of the quality of internal approaches depend on the quality of the data reported by relevant institutions under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 [3], which also need to be consistent and comparable.
Rezultati ocene kakovosti notranjih pristopov so odvisni od kakovosti podatkov, ki jih zadevne institucije poročajo v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2016/2070 [3], ki morajo biti tudi dosledni in primerljivi.
Therefore, competent authorities should be required to confirm the correct application of that Implementing Regulation by institutions, especially with regard to the application of the option available to institutions to refrain from reporting of certain individual portfolios.
Zato bi se moralo od pristojnih organov zahtevati, da potrdijo, da institucije pravilno uporabljajo navedeno izvedbeno uredbo, zlasti v zvezi z uporabo možnosti institucij, da ne poročajo določenih posameznih portfeljev.
Where competent authorities compute benchmarks based on the standardised approach, an adjustment should be made to the own fund requirements for credit risk that result from the application of the standardised approach, for reasons of prudence.
Če pristojni organi izračunavajo referenčna merila na podlagi standardiziranega pristopa, bi bilo treba zaradi skrbnosti prilagoditi kapitalske zahteve za kreditno tveganje, ki izhajajo iz uporabe standardiziranega pristopa.
This adjustment should be established at the level applied for the computation of the transitional Basel I floor based on Article 500 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Ta prilagoditev bi se morala določiti pri ravni, ki se uporablja za izračun prehodnega praga iz sporazuma Basel I na podlagi člena 500 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
Benchmarks based on the standardised approach are not currently considered appropriate to be computed in the case of market risk, as they can lead to distortions.
Referenčna merila, ki temeljijo na standardiziranem pristopu, se trenutno ne štejejo za primerna za izračune v primeru tržnega tveganja, ker lahko privedejo do izkrivljanj.
Due to major methodological differences in the computation of own funds requirements according to the standardised and internal approaches, mainly due to sharp differences in aggregation or diversification of individual positions, a comparison between the two metrics under market risk for small portfolios would not provide a meaningful indication of potential underestimation of own funds requirements.
Zaradi večjih razlik v metodologiji pri izračunavanju kapitalskih zahtev v skladu s standardiziranim in notranjimi pristopi, predvsem zaradi znatnih razlik pri združevanju ali razpršitvi posameznih pozicij, primerjava med obema metrikama v okviru tržnega tveganja za majhne portfelje ne bi zagotovila smiselnega kazalnika morebitne podcenjenosti kapitalskih zahtev.
Where standardised approach computations are considered in the assessment of credit risk models, their use should be only intended as benchmarks for assessment, rather than as floors.
Kadar se izračuni na podlagi standardiziranega pristopa upoštevajo pri oceni modelov za kreditno tveganje, bi se morali uporabljati zgolj kot referenčna merila za oceno in ne kot spodnje vrednosti.