natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, on the basis of a detailed risk assessment, in particular if the outcome of the ex-ante pillar assessment carried out to the IS in line with Article 61 of the Financial Regulation is deemed to be adequate, the Commission Authorising Officer in charge of PRIMA will envisage that:
Ob upoštevanju načela sorazmernosti se lahko finančna jamstva, ki se zahtevajo od IS, omejijo na najvišji znesek prispevka Unije.
Taking into account the principle of proportionality, the financial guarantees requested from the IS may be limited to the maximum amount of the Union contribution.
V skladu s tem je lahko odgovornost vsakega izdajatelja jamstva sorazmerna z deležem njegovega prispevka za pobudo PRIMA.
In accordance, the liability of each guarantor may be proportionate to the share of their contribution to PRIMA.
Izdajatelji jamstva se lahko v svojih dopisih o izjavi o odgovornosti dogovorijo glede načinov kritja te odgovornosti.
The guarantors may agree on the modalities in which they will cover this liability in their respective letters of declaration on liabilities.
Zadnje dejavnosti, ki se bodo financirale, vključno z zadnjimi razpisi za zbiranje projektnih predlogov v okviru ustreznih letnih delovnih načrtov, se začnejo izvajati do 31. decembra 2024.
The final activities to be funded, including the final calls for proposals under the relevant annual work plans shall be launched by 31 December 2024.
V ustrezno utemeljenih primerih se lahko začnejo izvajati do 31. decembra 2025.
Decision (EU) 2017/1331 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep (EU) 2017/1331 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Decision (EU) 2015/435 on the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin
o spremembi Sklepa (EU) 2015/435 o sprostitvi varnostne rezerve
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management [1], and in particular the second paragraph of point 14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 2. decembra 2013 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini, sodelovanju v proračunskih zadevah in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [1] ter zlasti drugega odstavka točke 14 Sporazuma,
Article 13 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 [2] has established a Contingency Margin of up to 0,03 % of the gross national income of the Union.
Člen 13 Uredbe Sveta (EU, Euratom) št. 1311/2013 [2] določa varnostno rezervo v višini do 0,03 % bruto nacionalnega dohodka Unije.
In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013, the Commission had calculated the absolute amount of the Contingency Margin for 2014 [3].
V skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 1311/2013 je Komisija izračunala absolutni znesek varnostne rezerve za leto 2014 [3].
By Decision (EU) 2015/435 [4], the European Parliament and the Council mobilised the Contingency Margin for making available additional payment appropriations in 2014, to be offset in 2018-2020.
Evropski parlament in Svet sta s Sklepom (EU) 2015/435 [4] sprostila varnostno rezervo, da sta leta 2014 zagotovila dodatne odobritve plačil, ki se pokrijejo v letih 2018–2020.
According to the medium-term payment forecast presented in the context of the Mid-Term Review, pressure on the annual payment ceilings in the years 2018-2020 is to be expected.
Glede na vmesno napoved plačil, predloženo v okviru vmesnega pregleda, se lahko v obdobju 2018–2020 pričakuje pritisk na letne zgornje meje za plačila.
The draft budget for the year 2017 shows a margin below the payment ceiling of EUR 9,6 billion, allowing for the offsetting of the full amount mobilised in 2014.
V predlogu proračuna za leto 2017 je prikazana razlika do zgornje meje za plačila v višini 9,6 milijarde EUR, ki omogoča kritje celotnega zneska, sproščenega leta 2014.
Decision (EU) 2015/435 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Sklep (EU) 2015/435 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Decision (EU) 2015/435 is amended as follows:
Sklep (EU) 2015/435 se spremeni:
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2014, the Contingency Margin shall be mobilised to provide the amount of EUR 2818233715 in payment appropriations over and above the payment ceiling of the multiannual financial framework.’.
Za splošni proračun Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2014 se sprosti varnostna rezerva, da se zagotovi znesek 2818233715 EUR v odobritvah plačil, ki presegajo zgornjo mejo plačil iz večletnega finančnega okvira.“;
The amount of EUR 2818233715 shall be offset against the margin under the payment ceiling for the year 2017.’.
Znesek 2818233715 EUR se krije z razliko v okviru zgornje meje plačil za leto 2017.“
Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 20 December 2013 on the technical adjustment of the financial framework for 2014 in line with movements in GNI (COM(2013) 928).
Sporočilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 20. decembra 2013 o tehnični prilagoditvi finančnega okvira za leto 2014 v skladu z gibanjem BND (COM(2013) 928).
Decision (EU) 2015/435 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2014 on the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin (OJ L 72, 17.3.2015, p. 4).
Sklep (EU) 2015/435 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2014 o sprostitvi varnostne rezerve (UL L 72, 17.3.2015, str. 4).
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1332
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2017/1332
amending Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU establishing a list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, as regards the Union of the Comoros
o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa Sveta 2014/170/EU o pripravi seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu v zvezi z Unijo Komori
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, amending Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1936/2001 and (EC) No 601/2004 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1093/94 and (EC) No 1447/1999 [1], and in particular Article 33(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1005/2008 z dne 29. septembra 2008 o vzpostavitvi sistema Skupnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje in o spremembi uredb (EGS) št. 2847/93, (ES) št. 1936/2001 in (ES) št. 601/2004 ter o razveljavitvi uredb (ES) št. 1093/94 in (ES) št. 1447/1999 [1] ter zlasti člena 33(1) Uredbe,
INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURE
UVOD IN POSTOPEK
Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 (‘IUU Regulation’) establishes a Union system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated (‘IUU’) fishing.
Uredba (ES) št. 1005/2008 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu) vzpostavlja sistem Unije za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje.
Chapter VI of the IUU Regulation lays down the procedure with respect to the identification of non-cooperating third countries, démarches in respect of countries identified as non-cooperating third countries, establishment of a list of non-cooperating third countries, removal from the list of non-cooperating third countries, publicity of the list of non-cooperating third countries and any emergency measures.
V poglavju VI uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu so določeni postopek v zvezi z opredelitvijo nesodelujočih tretjih držav, demarše v zvezi z državami, ki so opredeljene kot nesodelujoče tretje države, priprava seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav, črtanje s seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav, objava seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav in morebitni izredni ukrepi.
On 24 March 2014, the Council adopted Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU [2] which established a list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing pursuant to IUU Regulation.
Svet je 24. marca 2014 sprejel Izvedbeni sklep 2014/170/EU [2], s katerim je bil vzpostavljen seznam nesodelujočih tretjih držav pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu v skladu z uredbo o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu.
In accordance with Article 32 of the IUU Regulation, by Decision of 1 October 2015 (‘Decision of 1 October 2015’) [3], the Commission notified the Union of the Comoros (‘the Comoros’) of the possibility of being identified as a country which the Commission considers as a non-cooperating third country.
V skladu s členom 32 uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu je Komisija s Sklepom z dne 1. oktobra 2015 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sklep z dne 1. oktobra 2015) [3] Unijo Komori (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komori) obvestila o možnosti, da bodo opredeljeni kot država, ki jo Komisija obravnava kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo.
In the Decision of 1 October 2015, the Commission included the information concerning the essential facts and considerations underlying such possible identification.
Komisija je v Sklep z dne 1. oktobra 2015 vključila informacije o bistvenih dejstvih in ugotovitvah, na katerih temelji taka morebitna opredelitev.
The Decision of 1 October 2015 was notified to the Comoros together with a letter of the same date suggesting that the Comoros implement, in close cooperation with the Commission, a plan of action to rectify the identified shortcomings.
O Sklepu z dne 1. oktobra 2015 so bili Komori obveščeni skupaj z dopisom z istega dne ter s predlogom, naj v tesnem sodelovanju s Komisijo izvedejo akcijski načrt za odpravo ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti.
The Commission invited the Comoros in particular to: (i) take all necessary measures to implement the actions contained in the plan of action suggested by the Commission; (ii) assess the implementation of those actions; and (iii) send every 6 months a detailed report to the Commission assessing the implementation of each of those actions as regards, inter alia, its individual and/or overall effectiveness in ensuring a fully compliant fisheries control system.
Komisija je Komore pozvala, da zlasti: (i) sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za izvajanje ukrepov iz akcijskega načrta, ki ga je predlagala Komisija; (ii) ocenijo izvajanje teh ukrepov; in (iii) Komisiji vsakih šest mesecev pošljejo podrobno poročilo z oceno izvajanja teh ukrepov, med drugim v zvezi z njihovo individualno in/ali splošno učinkovitostjo pri zagotavljanju popolnoma skladnega sistema za nadzor ribolova.
By its Decision of 1 October 2015 and its letter, the Commission opened a process of dialogue with the Comoros and highlighted that it considered a period of 6 months as being sufficient in principle for reaching an agreement.
Obravnavane in upoštevane so bile ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih Komori predložili po Sklepu z dne 1. oktobra 2015.
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary.
O ugotovitvah Komisije so bili Komori pisno ali ustno obveščeni.
The oral and written comments submitted by the Comoros following the Decision of 1 October 2015 were considered and taken into account.
Zato je Komisija sprejela Izvedbeni sklep (EU) 2017/889 [4] o opredelitvi kot nesodelujoče tretje države pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu.
The Commission however took the view that the areas of concern and shortcomings as described in the Decision of 1 October 2015 had not been addressed sufficiently by the Comoros.
Svet na podlagi člena 34(1) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu s kvalificirano večino in na predlog Komisije tretjo državo črta s seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav, če navedena tretja država dokaže, da so se razmere, zaradi katerih je bila uvrščena na seznam, popravile.
Moreover, the Commission concluded that the measures of the plan of action had not been fully implemented.
Pri odločitvi o črtanju se upošteva tudi, ali je zadevna opredeljena tretja država uvedla dejanske ukrepe, s katerimi se lahko doseže trajno izboljšanje razmer.
As a consequence, the Commission adopted Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/889 [4], identifying the Comoros as a non-cooperating third country in fighting IUU fishing.
OPREDELITEV KOMOROV KOT NESODELUJOČE TRETJE DRŽAVE
Based on the investigation and dialogue procedures carried out by the Commission, including the correspondence exchanged and the meetings held, and the reasons underlying the Decision of 1 October 2015 and Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/889, it is appropriate to place the Comoros on the list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing.
Komisija je v Sklepu z dne 1. oktobra 2015 analizirala dolžnosti Komorov in ocenila njihovo izpolnjevanje mednarodnih obveznosti, ki jih imajo kot država zastave, pristanišča, obalna država ali država trga.
Pursuant to Article 34(1) of the IUU Regulation, the Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, is to remove a third country from the list of non-cooperating third countries if that country demonstrates that the situation that warranted its listing has been rectified.
Pri tem pregledu je upoštevala merila iz člena 31(4) do (7) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu.
A removal decision is also to take into consideration whether the identified third country concerned has taken concrete measures capable of achieving a lasting improvement of the situation.
Komisija je pregledala skladnost Komorov v skladu z ugotovitvami iz Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 ter ob upoštevanju ustreznih informacij, ki so jih o tem predložili Komori, predlaganega akcijskega načrta in sprejetih ukrepov za izboljšanje razmer.
IDENTIFICATION OF THE COMOROS AS A NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRY
Glavne pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je ugotovila Komisija v predlaganem akcijskem načrtu, so se nanašale na več pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju obveznosti mednarodnega prava, predvsem v zvezi z: nesprejetjem ustreznega pravnega okvira ter postopki registracije in izdajanja dovoljenj; neobstojem sodelovanja in izmenjave informacij znotraj uprave Komorov in s tretjimi državami, v katerih plovila Komorov izvajajo dejavnosti; neobstojem ustreznega in učinkovitega sistema spremljanja, nadzora in obladovanja; ter neobstojem sistema odvračilnih sankcij.
In the Decision of 1 October 2015, the Commission analysed the duties of the Comoros and evaluated its compliance with its international obligations as flag, port, coastal or market State.
Druge ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti se na splošno nanašajo na izpolnjevanje mednarodnih obveznosti, vključno s priporočili in resolucijami regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribolova.
For the purpose of that review, the Commission took into account the parameters listed in Article 31(4) to (7) of the IUU Regulation.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi pomanjkanje skladnosti s priporočili in resolucijami ustreznih organov, kot so mednarodni akcijski načrt za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter prostovoljne smernice o uspešnosti države zastave – oba navedena dokumenta je pripravila Organizacija Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo.
The Commission reviewed the compliance of the Comoros in line with the findings of the Decision of 1 October 2015, and having regard to relevant information provided thereon by the Comoros, the suggested plan of action, and the measures taken to rectify the situation.
Vendar pa se je pomanjkanje skladnosti z nezavezujočimi priporočili in resolucijami obravnavalo samo kot dodaten dokaz in ne kot podlaga za opredelitev.
The main shortcomings identified by the Commission in the suggested plan of action were related to several failures to implement obligations under international law, linked in particular to: the failure to adopt an adequate legal framework and registration and licensing procedures; the lack of cooperation and information sharing within the Comorian administration and with third countries where Comorian vessels operate; the lack of an adequate and efficient monitoring, control and surveillance system; and the lack of a deterrent sanctioning system.
Komisija je v Izvedbenem sklepu (EU) 2017/889 Komore opredelila kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo v skladu z uredbo o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu.
Other identified shortcomings relate, more generally, to compliance with international obligations including Regional Fisheries Management Organisations recommendations and resolutions.
V zvezi z morebitnimi omejitvami za Komore kot državo v razvoju je treba opozoriti, da lahko stopnja razvoja Komorov negativno vpliva na njihov razvojni status in splošno ravnanje na področju upravljanja ribolova.
A lack of compliance with recommendations and resolutions from relevant bodies such as the International Plan of Action against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing and the Voluntary Guidelines for Flag State Performance, both of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, were also identified.
Vendar ob upoštevanju vrste ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti na Komorih njihova stopnja razvoja ne more v celoti upravičiti ali na drug način utemeljiti splošnega ravnanja Komorov kot države zastave, pristanišča, obalne države ali države trga na področju ribištva ter nezadostnih ukrepov za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje.
However, the lack of compliance with non-binding recommendations and resolutions was considered only as supporting evidence and not as a basis for the identification.
Ob upoštevanju Sklepa z dne 1. oktobra 2015 in Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2017/889, dialoga med Komori in Komisijo ter rezultatov tega dialoga je mogoče ugotoviti, da so ukrepi, ki so jih Komori sprejeli v okviru svojih dolžnosti, ki jih imajo kot država zastave, nezadostni za izpolnitev določb členov 63, 64, 91, 94, 117 in 118 Konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu.
In Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/889, the Commission identified the Comoros as a non-cooperating third country pursuant to the IUU Regulation.
Zato Komori niso izpolnili svojih dolžnosti, ki jih imajo kot država zastave v skladu z mednarodnim pravom, da sprejmejo ukrepe za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje.
With respect to the possible constraints upon the Comoros as a developing country, it is noted that the development status and overall performance of the Comoros with respect to fisheries management may be impaired by its level of development.
PRIPRAVA SEZNAMA NESODELUJOČIH TRETJIH DRŽAV
However, having taken account of the nature of the established shortcomings of the Comoros, the Comorian development level cannot fully excuse or otherwise justify its overall performance as flag, port, coastal or market State with respect to fisheries and the insufficiency of its actions to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.
Na podlagi ugotovitev v zvezi s Komori bi bilo treba to državo v skladu členom 33 uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu dodati na seznam nesodelujočih tretjih držav iz Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/170/EU.
Having regard to the Decision of 1 October 2015 and Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/889, and to the dialogue process with the Comoros held with the Commission and the outcome of that process, it can be concluded that the actions undertaken by the Comoros in light of its duties as flag State are insufficient to comply with Articles 63, 64, 91, 94, 117 and 118 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Navedeni izvedbeni sklep bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Thus, the Comoros has failed to discharge its duties under international law as flag State to take action to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.
Vključitev Komorov na seznam nesodelujočih tretjih držav pri boju proti nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu povzroči uporabo ukrepov iz člena 38 uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu.
ESTABLISHMENT OF A LIST OF NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRIES
Člen 38(1) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu določa prepoved uvoza ribiških proizvodov, ki so jih ujela ribiška plovila, ki plujejo pod zastavo nesodelujočih tretjih držav.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to the Comoros, that country should be added, in accordance with Article 33 of the IUU Regulation, to the list of non-cooperating third countries established by the Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU.
V primeru Komorov bi morala prepoved uvoza veljati za vse staleže in vrste, to je za vse ribiške proizvode, kot so določeni v členu 2(8) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu, saj pomanjkanje ustreznih ukrepov v zvezi z nezakonitim, neprijavljenim in nereguliranim ribolovom, zaradi katerega so bili Komori opredeljeni kot nesodelujoča tretja država, ni omejeno na določen stalež ali vrsto.
That Decision should therefore be amended accordingly.
Treba je opozoriti, da nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov med drugim izčrpava staleže rib, uničuje morske habitate, ogroža ohranjanje in trajnostno rabo morskih virov, izkrivlja konkurenco, ogroža zanesljivost preskrbe s hrano, postavlja poštene ribiče v nepravičen slabši položaj in slabi obalne skupnosti.
The inclusion of the Comoros in the list of non-cooperating third countries in the fight against IUU fishing entails the application of the measures laid down in Article 38 of the IUU Regulation.
Glede na obseg težav, povezanih s tovrstnim ribolovom, se zdi potrebno, da Unija hitro izvede ukrepe v zvezi s Komori kot nesodelujočo državo.
Article 38(1) of the IUU Regulation provides for the prohibition of importation of fisheries products caught by vessels flying the flag of non-cooperating third countries.
Zato bi moral ta sklep začeti veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
In the case of the Comoros, that prohibition should cover all stocks and species, namely all fishery products as defined in Article 2(8) of the IUU Regulation, since the lack of appropriate measures adopted in relation to IUU fishing leading to the identification of the Comoros as a non-cooperating third country is not limited to a given stock or species.
Če Komori dokažejo, da so se razmere, zaradi katerih so bili uvrščeni na seznam, popravile, Svet s kvalificirano večino in na predlog Komisije Komore črta s seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav v skladu s členom 34(1) uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu.
It is noted that IUU fishing, inter alia, depletes fish stocks, destroys marine habitats, undermines the conservation and sustainable use of marine resources, distorts competition, endangers food security, puts honest fishermen at an unfair disadvantage, and weakens coastal communities.
Pri vsaki takšni odločitvi o črtanju bi bilo treba prav tako upoštevati, ali so Komori uvedli dejanske ukrepe, s katerimi se lahko doseže trajno izboljšanje razmer –
In view of the magnitude of the problems related to IUU fishing, it is considered necessary for the Union to expeditiously implement the actions in respect of the Comoros as a non-cooperating third country.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
As a consequence, this Decision should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Člen 1
If the Comoros demonstrates that the situation that warranted its listing has been rectified, the Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, is to remove the Comoros from the list of non-cooperating third countries in line with Article 34(1) of the IUU Regulation.
V Prilogo k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/170/EU se doda „Unija Komori“.
Any such removal decision should also take into consideration whether the Comoros has taken concrete measures capable of achieving a lasting improvement of the situation,
Člen 2
Article 1
V Bruslju, 11. julija 2017
‘The Union of the Comoros’ is hereby added to the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU.
Za Svet