natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is necessary, having regard to the objectives of Article 50(2)(g) of the Treaty, that the Member States' laws relating to the increase or reduction of capital ensure that the principles of equal treatment of shareholders in the same position and of protection of creditors whose claims exist prior to the decision on reduction are observed and harmonised.
Glede na cilje iz člena 50(2)(g) Pogodbe je v zakonodaji držav članic, ki se nanaša na povečanje ali zmanjšanje kapitala, potrebno zagotoviti spoštovanje in harmonizacijo načel enake obravnave delničarjev v enakem položaju ter varstvo upnikov, katerih zahtevki so obstajali pred odločitvijo o zmanjšanju.
In order to enhance standardised creditor protection in all Member States, creditors should be able to resort, under certain conditions, to judicial or administrative proceedings where their claims are at stake, as a consequence of a reduction in the capital of a public limited liability company.
Za izboljšanje standardizirane zaščite upnikov v vseh državah članicah bi moralo biti upnikom omogočeno, da se pod določenimi pogoji zatečejo k pravnim ali upravnim postopkom, kadar so ogroženi njihovi zahtevki zaradi zmanjšanega kapitala delniške družbe.
In order to ensure that market abuse is prevented, Member States should take into account, for the purpose of the implementation of this Directive, the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [15].
Da bi zagotovile, da ne prihaja do tržnih zlorab, bi morale države članice za izvajanje te direktive upoštevati določbe Uredbe (EU) št. 596/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [15].
The protection of the interests of members and third parties requires that the laws of the Member States relating to mergers of public limited liability companies be coordinated, and that provision for mergers be made in the laws of all the Member States.
Varovanje interesov družbenikov in tretjih strani zahteva, da se zakonodaja držav članic v zvezi z združitvami delniških družb uskladi in da zakonodaja vseh držav članic vsebujejo določbe o združitvah.
In the context of such coordination, it is particularly important that the shareholders of merging companies be kept adequately informed in as objective a manner as possible, and that their rights be suitably protected.
V kontekstu take uskladitve je posebej pomembno, da so delničarji družb, ki se združujejo, primerno in kar se da objektivno obveščeni ter da so njihove pravice ustrezno zaščitene.
However, there is no reason to require an examination of the draft terms of a merger by an independent expert for the shareholders if all the shareholders agree that it can be dispensed with.
Vendar ni razloga, da se zahteva pregled načrta združitve za delničarje s strani neodvisnega izvedenca, če se vsi delničarji strinjajo, da je ne potrebujejo.
The disclosure requirements for the protection of the interests of members and third parties should include mergers so that third parties are kept adequately informed.
Zahteve po razkritju, ki so namenjene varovanju interesov družbenikov in tretjih strani, bi morale vključevati združitve, da bodo tretje strani ustrezno obveščene.
The safeguards afforded to members and third parties in connection with mergers of public limited liability companies should cover certain legal practices which in important respects are similar to merger, so that the obligation to provide such protection cannot be evaded.
Zaščitni ukrepi za družbenike in tretje strani v zvezi z združitvami delniških družb bi morali zajemati določene pravne prakse, ki so v pomembnih vidikih podobne združitvam, tako da se ni mogoče izogniti obveznosti zagotovitve takšne zaščite.
To ensure certainty in the law as regards relations between the companies concerned, between them and third parties, and between the members, it is necessary to limit the cases in which nullity can arise by providing that defects be remedied wherever that is possible, and by restricting the period within which nullification proceedings can be commenced.
Da se zagotovi pravna varnost glede odnosov med zadevnimi družbami, med njimi in tretjimi stranmi ter med družbeniki, je treba omejiti primere, iz katerih lahko izhaja ničnost, z zagotovitvijo, da se napake odpravijo povsod, kjer je to mogoče, in z omejitvijo obdobja, v katerem je mogoče začeti postopek za ugotovitev ničnosti.
This Directive also facilitates the cross-border merger of limited liability companies.
Ta direktiva tudi olajšuje čezmejne združitve kapitalskih družb.
The laws of the Member States should allow the cross-border merger of a national limited liability company with a limited liability company from another Member State if the national law of the relevant Member States permits mergers between such types of company.
Zakonodaja držav članic bi morala dovoljevati čezmejne združitve nacionalnih kapitalskih družb s kapitalskimi družbami iz drugih držav članic, če nacionalna zakonodaja zadevnih držav članic dovoljuje združitve družb takšnih vrst.
In order to facilitate cross-border merger operations, it should be specified that, unless this Directive provides otherwise, each company taking part in a cross-border merger, and each third party concerned, remains subject to the provisions and formalities of the national law which would be applicable in the case of a national merger.
Da bi olajšali čezmejne združitve, bi bilo treba določiti, da za vsako družbo, ki sodeluje pri čezmejni združitvi in vsako tretjo stran, ki jo to zadeva, še naprej veljajo predpisi in formalnosti nacionalnega prava, ki bi se uporabljalo v primeru nacionalne združitve, razen če ta direktiva ne določa drugače.
None of the provisions and formalities of national law, to which reference is made in this Directive, should introduce restrictions on freedom of establishment or on the free movement of capital, save where these can be justified in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and in particular, by requirements of the general interest and are both necessary for, and proportionate to, the attainment of such overriding requirements.
Predpisi in formalnosti v nacionalnem pravu, na katere se sklicuje ta direktiva, ne bi smeli uvajati omejitev svobode ustanavljanja ali prostega pretoka kapitala, razen kadar so takšne omejitve upravičene v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije in zlasti z zahtevami splošnega interesa ter so potrebne za izpolnjevanje takšnih nujnih zahtev in z njimi sorazmerne.
The common draft terms of a cross-border merger should be drawn up in the same terms for each of the companies concerned in the various Member States.
Skupni načrt čezmejne združitve bi bilo treba sestaviti tako, da določa enake pogoje za vse zadevne družbe iz različnih držav članic.
The minimum content of such common draft terms should therefore be specified, while leaving the companies free to agree on other terms.
Zato je treba določiti minimalno vsebino takšnega skupnega načrta čezmejne združitve, hkrati pa je treba družbam pustiti možnost, da se dogovorijo o drugih pogojih.
In order to protect the interests of members and others, both the common draft terms of the cross-border merger and the completion of the cross-border merger should be publicised for each merging company via an entry in the appropriate public register.
Za zaščito interesov družbenikov in tretjih oseb je treba za vsako družbo, ki se združuje, predložiti javnosti skupni načrt čezmejne združitve in tudi zaključek čezmejne združitve z vpisom v ustreznem javnem registru.
The laws of all the Member States should provide for the drawing-up at national level of a report on the common draft terms of the cross-border merger by one or more experts on behalf of each of the companies that are merging.
V zakonodaji vseh držav članic bi bilo treba določiti, da na nacionalni ravni eden ali več strokovnjakov pripravi poročilo o skupnem načrtu čezmejne združitve za vsako družbo, ki se združuje.
In order to limit experts' costs connected with cross-border mergers, provision should be made for the possibility of drawing up a single report intended for all members of companies taking part in a cross-border merger operation.
Da bi se omejili stroški za strokovnjake v zvezi s čezmejnimi združitvami, bi bilo treba omogočiti sestavo enega skupnega načrta za vse družbenike družb, ki sodelujejo pri čezmejni združitvi.
The common draft terms of the cross-border merger should be approved by the general meeting of each of those companies.
Skupni načrt čezmejne združitve bi morale potrditi skupščine delničarjev vsake od teh družb.
In order to facilitate cross-border merger operations, it should be provided that monitoring of the completion and legality of the decision-making process in each merging company should be carried out by the national authority having jurisdiction over each of those companies, whereas monitoring of the completion and legality of the cross-border merger should be carried out by the national authority having jurisdiction over the company resulting from the cross-border merger.
Da bi se olajšale čezmejne združitve, bi bilo treba predvideti, da naj zaključek in zakonitost postopka odločanja v posameznih družbah, ki se združujejo, nadzira nacionalni organ, pristojen za posamezno družbo, medtem ko bi moral zaključek in zakonitost čezmejne združitve nadzirati nacionalni organ, pristojen za družbo, ki nastane s čezmejno združitvijo.
The national authority in question could be a court, a notary or any other competent authority appointed by the Member State concerned.
Ta nacionalni organ je lahko sodišče, notar ali kateri koli drug pristojni organ, ki ga imenuje zadevna država članica.
The national law determining the date on which the cross-border merger takes effect, this being the law to which the company resulting from the cross-border merger is subject, should also be specified.
Določiti bi bilo treba tudi nacionalno pravo, v skladu s katerim se določi dan začetka učinkovanja čezmejne združitve, in sicer je to pravo, ki velja za družbo, ki nastane s čezmejno združitvijo.
In order to protect the interests of members and others, the legal effects of the cross-border merger, distinguishing as to whether the company resulting from the cross-border merger is an acquiring company or a new company, should be specified.
Da bi se zavarovali interesi družbenikov in tretjih oseb, bi bilo treba določiti pravne učinke čezmejne združitve, pri čemer bi bilo treba razlikovati, ali je družba, ki nastane s čezmejno združitvijo, prevzemna družba ali nova družba.
In the interests of legal certainty, it should no longer be possible, after the date on which a cross-border merger takes effect, to declare the merger null and void.
Zaradi pravne varnosti bi bilo treba določiti, da čezmejne združitve po dnevu njenega začetka učinkovanja ni več mogoče razglasiti za nično.
This Directive is without prejudice to the application of the legislation on the control of concentrations between undertakings, both at Union level, by Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [16], and at Member State level.
Ta direktiva ne posega v uporabo zakonodaje o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij, tako na ravni Unije na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 [16] kakor tudi na ravni držav članic.
This Directive does not affect Union legislation regulating credit intermediaries and other financial undertakings and national rules made or introduced pursuant to such Union legislation.
Ta direktiva ne vpliva na zakonodajo Unije o posrednikih za posojila in o drugih finančnih ustanovah ter v skladu s to zakonodajo Unije sprejeta ali uvedena nacionalna pravila.
This Directive is without prejudice to Member State legislation demanding information on the place of central administration or the principal place of business proposed for the company resulting from the cross-border merger.
Ta direktiva ne posega v zakonodajo držav članic, s katero se zahtevajo informacije o predlaganem kraju glavne uprave ali glavnem kraju poslovanja družbe, nastale s čezmejno združitvijo.
Employees' rights, other than rights of participation, should remain subject to the national provisions referred to in Council Directives 98/59/EC [17] and 2001/23/EC [18], and in Directives 2002/14/EC [19] and 2009/38/EC [20] of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Za pravice delavcev, razen pravic do soodločanja, še naprej veljajo nacionalne določbe, na katere se sklicujeta direktivi Sveta 98/59/ES [17] in 2001/23/ES [18] ter direktivi 2002/14/ES [19] in 2009/38/ES [20] Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
If employees have participation rights in one of the merging companies under the circumstances set out in this Directive and, if the national law of the Member State in which the company resulting from the cross-border merger has its registered office does not provide for the same level of participation as operated in the relevant merging companies, including in committees of the supervisory board that have decision-making powers, or does not provide for the same entitlement to exercise rights for employees of establishments resulting from the cross-border merger, the participation of employees in the company resulting from the cross-border merger and their involvement in the definition of such rights should be regulated.
Če imajo delavci pravice do soodločanja v eni od družb, ki se združuje v okoliščinah iz te direktive, in če nacionalno pravo države članice, v kateri ima družba, nastala s čezmejno združitvijo, registriran sedež, ne določa enake ravni soodločanja, kakor je zagotovljena v drugih družbah, ki se združujejo, vključno z odbori nadzornega organa, ki imajo pooblastila za odločanje, ali če to pravo ne predvideva enakih upravičenj izvrševanja pravic delavcev družb, nastalih s čezmejno združitvijo, bi bilo treba urediti soodločanje delavcev v družbi, nastali s čezmejno združitvijo, in delavce vključiti v opredelitev teh pravic.
To that end, the principles and procedures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 [21] and in Council Directive 2001/86/EC [22], should be taken as a basis, subject, however, to modifications that are deemed necessary because the resulting company will be subject to the national laws of the Member State where it has its registered office.
Pri tem bi bilo treba uporabiti načela in postopke, določene v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2157/2001 [21] in v Direktivi Sveta 2001/86/ES [22], vendar z nekaterimi potrebnimi spremembami, ker bo za nastalo družbo veljala nacionalna zakonodaja države članice, v kateri ima registriran sedež.
A prompt start to negotiations under Article 133 of this Directive, with a view to not unnecessarily delaying mergers, may be ensured by Member States in accordance with Article 3(2)(b) of Directive 2001/86/EC.
Države članice lahko v skladu s členom 3(2)(b) Direktive 2001/86/ES zagotovijo hiter začetek pogajanj na podlagi člena 133 te direktive, da se z združitvami ne bi po nepotrebnem zavlačevalo.
For the purpose of determining the level of employee participation operated in the relevant merging companies, account should also be taken of the proportion of employee representatives amongst the members of the management group, which covers the profit units of the companies, subject to employee participation.
Pri ugotavljanju ravni soodločanja delavcev, kadar le-to obstaja, v zadevnih družbah, ki se združujejo, bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi delež predstavnikov delavcev med člani skupine za upravljanje, pristojne za profitne enote družb.
The protection of the interests of members and third parties requires that the laws of the Member States relating to divisions of public limited liability companies be coordinated where Member States permit such operations.
Varovanje interesov družbenikov in tretjih strani zahteva usklajevanje zakonodaje držav članic glede delitev delniških družb, kadar države članice dovoljujejo takšne postopke.
In the context of such coordination, it is particularly important that the shareholders of the companies involved in a division be kept adequately informed in as objective a manner as possible, and that their rights be suitably protected.
V smislu takšnega usklajevanja je posebno pomembno, da so delničarji družb, ki so vključene v delitev, primerno in kar se da objektivno obveščeni ter da so njihove pravice ustrezno zaščitene.
Creditors, including debenture holders, and persons having other claims on the companies involved in a division of public limited liability companies, should be protected so that the division does not adversely affect their interests.
Upniki, vključno z imetniki zadolžnic, in osebe, ki imajo druge zahtevke do družb, vključenih v delitev delniških družb, bi morali biti zaščiteni tako, da delitev ne škoduje njihovim interesom.
Disclosure requirements under Section 1 of Chapter III of Title I of this Directive should include divisions so that third parties are kept adequately informed.
Zahteve po razkritju iz oddelka 1 poglavja III naslova I te direktive bi morale vključevati tudi delitev družb, tako da bodo tretje strani ustrezno obveščene.
The safeguards afforded to members and third parties in connection with divisions should cover certain legal practices which in important respects are similar to division, so that the obligation to provide such protection cannot be evaded.
Zaščitne ukrepe za družbenike in tretje strani v zvezi z delitvami bi bilo treba razširiti, tako da bodo zajete nekatere pravne prakse, ki so v pomembnih vidikih podobne delitvam in se tako ne bo mogoče izogniti obveznosti, da se poskrbi za takšno varstvo.
To ensure certainty in the law as regards relations between the public limited liability companies involved in the division, between them and third parties, and between the members, the cases in which nullity can arise should be limited by providing that defects should be remedied wherever that is possible and by restricting the period within which nullification proceedings can be commenced.
Da se zagotovi pravna varnost pri odnosih med delniškimi družbami, vključenimi v delitev, med njimi in tretjimi stranmi, pa tudi med družbeniki, bi bilo treba primere, iz katerih lahko izhaja ničnost, omejiti z zagotovitvijo, da se napake odpravijo, povsod kadar je to mogoče, in z omejitvijo obdobja, v katerem je mogoče začeti postopek za ugotovitev ničnosti.
Company websites or other websites offer, in certain cases, an alternative to publication via the companies registers.
Spletna mesta družb ali druga spletna mesta v določenih primerih nudijo alternativno možnost objavi v registru družb.
Member States should be able to designate those other websites which companies can use free of charge for such publication, such as websites of business associations or chambers of commerce or the central electronic platform referred to in this Directive.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da določijo tista druga spletna mesta, ki jih lahko družbe brezplačno uporabljajo za takšno objavljanje, kot so na primer spletna mesta poslovnih združenj, gospodarskih zbornic ali osrednja elektronska platforma iz te direktive.
Where the possibility exists of using company or other websites for publication of draft terms of merger and/or division and of other documents that have to be made available to shareholders and creditors in the process, guarantees relating to the security of the website and the authenticity of the documents should be met.
Kadar obstaja možnost uporabe spletnega mesta družbe ali drugih spletnih mest za objavo načrta združitve in/ali delitve in drugih dokumentov, ki jih je treba dati na voljo delničarjem in upnikom v postopku, bi bilo treba izpolniti pogoje za zagotovitev varnosti spletnega mesta in pristnosti dokumentov.
Member States should be able to provide that the extensive reporting or information requirements relating to the merger or division of companies, laid down in Chapter I and Chapter III of Title II, need not be complied with where all the shareholders of the companies involved in the merger or division agree that such compliance can be dispensed with.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da določijo, da ni treba izpolnjevati obsežnih zahtev za poročanje in obveščanje glede združitve ali delitve družb, kot je določeno v poglavju I in poglavju III naslova II, kadar se s tem strinjajo vsi delničarji družb, udeleženih pri združitvi ali delitvi.
Any modification of Chapter I and Chapter III of Title II allowing such agreement by shareholders, should be without prejudice to the systems of protection of the interests of creditors of the companies involved, and to rules aimed at ensuring the provision of necessary information to the employees of those companies and to public authorities, such as tax authorities, controlling the merger or division in accordance with existing Union law.
Kakršne koli spremembe poglavja I in poglavja III naslova II, ki dovoljujejo takšen dogovor delničarjev, ne bi smele posegati v sisteme zaščite interesov upnikov udeleženih družb, pa tudi ne v pravila za zagotavljanje potrebnih informacij zaposlenim v teh družbah in javnim organom, kot so davčni organi, ki nadzirajo združitve ali delitve v skladu z obstoječim pravom Unije.
It is not necessary to impose the requirement to draw up an accounting statement where an issuer whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market publishes half-yearly financial reports in accordance with Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [23].
Zahteva za pripravo bilance stanja ni potrebna, kadar izdajatelj vrednostnih papirjev, ki so sprejeti v trgovanje na reguliranem trgu, objavlja polletna računovodska poročila v skladu z Direktivo 2004/109/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [23].
An independent expert's report on consideration other than in cash is often not needed where an independent expert's report protecting the interests of shareholders or creditors also has to be drawn up in the context of the merger or the division.
Poročilo neodvisnega izvedenca za vložek, ki ni vplačan v denarju, pogosto ni potrebno, če je treba pripraviti poročilo neodvisnega izvedenca za zaščito interesov delničarjev ali upnikov tudi v okviru združitve ali delitve.
Member States should therefore have the possibility in such cases of dispensing companies from the reporting requirement regarding consideration other than in cash or of providing that both reports can be drawn up by the same expert.
V takih primerih bi zato države članice morale imeti možnost, da družbe izvzamejo iz zahteve za poročanje za vložek, ki ni vplačan v denarju, ali da določijo, da lahko obe poročili pripravi isti izvedenec.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [24] and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [25] govern the processing of personal data, including the electronic transmission of personal data within the Member States.
Obdelavo osebnih podatkov, tudi elektronski prenos osebnih podatkov v državah članicah, urejata Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [24] ter Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [25].
Any processing of personal data by the registers of Member States, by the Commission and, if applicable, by any third party involved in operating the platform should take place in compliance with those acts.
Vsaka obdelava osebnih podatkov v registrih držav članic, s strani Komisije, po potrebi pa tudi s strani katerih koli tretjih strani, vključenih v upravljanje platforme, bi morala potekati v skladu z navedenima aktoma.
The implementing acts to be adopted in relation to the system of interconnection of registers should, where appropriate, ensure such compliance, in particular by establishing the relevant tasks and responsibilities of all the participants concerned and the organisational and technical rules applicable to them.
Izvedbeni akti, ki se sprejmejo v zvezi s sistemom povezovanja registrov, bi morali, kadar je to primerno, zagotoviti takšno skladnost, zlasti z opredelitvijo ustreznih nalog in odgovornosti vseh zadevnih udeležencev ter določitvijo organizacijskih in tehničnih pravil, ki bi veljala zanje.