natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A more effective implementation of that Directive would reduce possibilities of misuse of procedures and remove inefficiencies, while ensuring the protection of fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Z učinkovitejšim izvajanjem navedene direktive bi se zmanjšale možnosti za zlorabo postopkov in odpravile pomanjkljivosti, hkrati pa bi se zagotovilo varstvo temeljnih pravic, kot so določene v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
This Recommendation provides guidance on how the provisions of Directive 2008/115/EC should be used for achieving more effective return procedures, and call on the Member States to take the necessary measures to remove legal and practical obstacles to return.
To priporočilo zagotavlja smernice o načinu uporabe določb Direktive 2008/115/ES za povečanje učinkovitosti postopkov vračanja ter poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za odpravo pravnih in praktičnih ovir za vračanje.
An effective Union return policy requires efficient and proportionate measures for the apprehension and identification of illegally staying third-country nationals, swift processing of their cases, and adequate capacity to ensure their presence in view of return.
Učinkovita politika Unije na področju vračanja zahteva učinkovite in sorazmerne ukrepe za prijetje in identifikacijo nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav, hitro obravnavanje njihovih primerov ter ustrezne zmogljivosti za zagotovitev njihove navzočnosti za namene vrnitve.
Organising return requires a streamlined and well integrated organisation of multi-disciplinary competences at national level.
Pri organizaciji vračanja je treba usklajeno in celovito povezati večdisciplinarne sposobnosti na nacionalni ravni.
In addition, it demands procedures and instruments that allow information to be made promptly available to the competent authorities, as well as cooperation between all actors that are involved in the different procedures.
Potrebni so tudi postopki in instrumenti, ki omogočajo, da so informacije nemudoma na voljo pristojnim organom, ter sodelovanje med vsemi akterji, ki so vključeni v različne postopke.
Multi-disciplinary trained and competent staff gathering all relevant competences is needed to ensure that national authorities are able to respond to the needs, particularly in circumstances where Member States are confronted with a significant burden in implementing the obligation to return illegally staying third-country nationals.
Poleg tega je potrebno večdisciplinarno izobraženo in usposobljeno osebje, ki združuje vse zadevne sposobnosti, da se zagotovi, da se lahko nacionalni organi odzovejo na potrebe, zlasti kadar se države članice soočajo z znatnim bremenom pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti glede vračanja nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav.
In organising this integrated and coordinated approach, Member States should make full use of the available Union financial instruments, programmes and projects in the field of return, in particular of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund.
Pri oblikovanju tega celovitega in usklajenega pristopa bi morale države članice v celoti izkoristiti razpoložljive finančne instrumente, programe in projekte Unije na področju vračanja, zlasti Sklad za azil, migracije in vključevanje.
In this context, the Member States should also take into account the migratory pressure that the competent authorities are dealing with.
V zvezi s tem bi morale tudi upoštevati migracijski pritisk, s katerim se soočajo pristojni organi.
In accordance with Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC, the Member States should systematically issue a return decision to third-country nationals who are staying illegally on their territory.
V skladu s členom 6(1) Direktive 2008/115/ES bi morale države članice sistematično izdajati odločbe o vrnitvi državljanom tretjih držav, ki nezakonito prebivajo na njihovem ozemlju.
The legislation and the practice in the Member States does not give full effect to this obligation in all circumstances, thereby undermining the effectiveness of the Union return system.
Zakonodaja in praksa v državah članicah ne zagotavljata polnega učinka te obveznosti v vseh okoliščinah, kar ogroža učinkovitost sistema Unije za vračanje.
For instance, certain Member States do not issue return decisions following a negative decision on an asylum claim or a residence permit, or do not issue such decisions to illegally staying third-country nationals who do not hold a valid identity or travel document.
Nekatere države članice na primer ne izdajo odločb o vrnitvi po negativni odločitvi o prošnji za azil ali dovoljenju za prebivanje ali pa ne izdajo takih odločb nezakonito prebivajočim državljanom tretjih držav, ki nimajo veljavnega osebnega dokumenta ali potne listine.
Depending on the institutional set-up of the Member States, in particular when different authorities deal with the process, a return decision is not necessarily or immediately followed by a request to the authorities of third-countries to verify the identity of the illegally staying third-country national and to deliver a valid travel document.
Odvisno od institucionalne ureditve držav članic, zlasti kadar postopek obravnavajo različni organi, odločbi o vrnitvi ne sledi nujno ali takoj zahteva organom tretjih držav, da preverijo istovetnost nezakonito prebivajočega državljana tretje države in predložijo veljavno potno listino.
In accordance with Article 13 of the Schengen Borders Code [6], a person who has crossed a border illegally and who has no right to stay on the territory of the Member State concerned shall be apprehended and made subject to procedures respecting Directive 2008/115/EC.
V skladu s členom 13 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah [6] se oseba, ki je nezakonito prestopila mejo in nima pravice do bivanja na ozemlju zadevne države članice, pridrži in se zanjo uporabi postopek, ki je v skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES.
Directive 2008/115/EC establishes that the state of health of the third-country nationals concerned shall be taken into account when implementing that Directive, and that emergency health care and essential treatment of illness must be provided pending return.
Direktiva 2008/115/ES določa, da se pri njenem izvajanju upošteva zdravstveno stanje zadevnih državljanov tretjih držav ter da se pred vrnitvijo zagotovita nujna zdravstvena oskrba in osnovno zdravljenje.
It is however essential to ensure that removals of illegally staying third-country nationals are enforced and measures are taken to prevent behaviour aimed at hampering or preventing return, such as false new medical claims.
Vendar je bistveno zagotoviti, da se odstranijo nezakonito prebivajoči državljani tretjih držav in da se sprejmejo ukrepi za preprečevanje ravnanja, s katerim se ovira ali preprečuje vrnitev, kot so lažne nove navedbe glede zdravstvenega stanja.
Moreover, it is also necessary to put in place measures tackling in an efficient manner asylum applications made merely to delay or frustrate the enforcement of return decisions.
Poleg tega je treba sprejeti ukrepe za učinkovito obravnavanje prošenj za azil, ki so bile vložene samo zaradi odložitve ali onemogočanja izvršitve odločb o vrnitvi.
Directive 2008/115/EC, while obliging the third-country national illegally staying to leave the Union, requires return decisions to be enforced only by the issuing Member States.
Direktiva 2008/115/ES zahteva, da nezakonito prebivajoči državljani tretjih držav zapustijo Unijo, hkrati pa tudi določa, da odločbe o vrnitvi izvršujejo le države članice izdajateljice.
A return process can be launched in every Member State that apprehends the same illegally staying third-country national.
Postopek vračanja se lahko začne v vsaki državi članici, v kateri je prijet isti nezakonito prebivajoči državljan tretje države.
Mutual recognition of return decision, as provided for by Council Directive 2001/40/EC [7] and Council Decision 2004/191/EC [8], would accelerate return process and deter unauthorised secondary movements within the Union.
Medsebojno priznavanje odločb o vrnitvi, kot je določeno v Direktivi Sveta 2001/40/ES [7] in Odločbi Sveta 2004/191/ES [8], bi pospešilo postopek vračanja in odvračalo od nedovoljenega sekundarnega gibanja znotraj Unije.
Detention can be an essential element for enhancing the effectiveness of the Union's return system, which should only be used if no other sufficient but less coercive measures can be applied effectively in accordance with Article 15(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC.
Pridržanje je lahko bistven element za povečanje učinkovitosti sistema Unije za vračanje, pri čemer bi se moralo uporabljati samo, če ni možno učinkovito uporabiti drugih zadostnih, vendar manj prisilnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 15(1) Direktive 2008/115/ES.
In particular, where necessary, to ensure that illegally staying third-country nationals do not abscond, detention can allow for a successful preparation and organisation of return operations.
Poleg tega lahko pridržanje, kadar je potrebno za zagotovitev, da nezakonito prebivajoči državljani tretjih držav ne pobegnejo, omogoči uspešno pripravo in organizacijo operacij vračanja.
The maximum duration period of detention currently used by several Member States is significantly shorter than the one allowed by Directive 2008/115/EC and which is needed to complete the return procedure successfully.
Najdaljše obdobje pridržanja, ki se trenutno uporablja v več državah članicah, je bistveno krajše od obdobja, ki ga določa Direktiva 2008/115/ES in ki je potrebno za uspešno dokončanje postopka vračanja.
These short periods of detention are precluding effective removals.
Ta krajša obdobja pridržanja preprečujejo učinkovite odstranitve.
Deadlines for lodging appeals against decisions related to return diverge significantly among Member States, ranging from few days to one month or more.
Roki za vložitev pritožb zoper odločbe o vrnitvi se med državami članicami zelo razlikujejo, in sicer znašajo od nekaj dni do enega meseca ali več.
In compliance with fundamental rights, the deadline should provide enough time to ensure access to an effective remedy, while taking into account that long deadlines can have a detrimental effect on return procedures.
V skladu s temeljnimi pravicami bi moral rok dopuščati dovolj časa, da se zagotovi dostop do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati dejstvo, da lahko dolgi roki negativno vplivajo na postopke vračanja.
Irregularly staying third-country nationals should be granted the right to be heard by the competent authorities before any individual measure which would affect him or her is taken.
Nezakonito prebivajoči državljani tretjih držav bi morali imeti pravico, da jih pred sprejetjem kakršnega koli posameznega ukrepa, ki na njih vpliva, zaslišijo pristojni organi.
Under Directive 2008/115/EC, an automatic suspensive effect of appeals against return decisions should be granted when there is a risk that the third-country national concerned would be exposed to a real risk of ill-treatment in case of return, in violation of Articles 19(2) and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union [9].
V skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES bi bilo treba zagotoviti samodejni suspenzivni učinek pritožb zoper odločbe o vrnitvi, kadar obstaja nevarnost, da bo zadevni državljan tretje države v primeru vrnitve izpostavljen resničnemu tveganju, da bo obravnavan v nasprotju s členom 19(2) in členom 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, kot ju razlaga Sodišče Evropske unije [9].
A large number of Member States conduct repetitive assessments of the risk of refoulement all along the different phases of the asylum and return procedures, which can cause the unnecessary delays in the return of illegally staying third-country nationals.
Veliko držav članic izvaja ponavljajoče se ocene nevarnosti vračanja v vseh različnih fazah azilnih postopkov in postopkov vračanja, kar lahko povzroči nepotrebne zamude pri vračanju nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav.
Return of an unaccompanied minor to the third country of origin and reunification with the family may be in the best interests of the child.
Vrnitev mladoletnika brez spremstva v tretjo državo izvora in ponovna združitev družine sta lahko v otrokovo korist.
The prohibition to issue return decisions to unaccompanied minors, which exists in the national legislation of several Member States, does not give full effect to the Member States' obligation to take due account of the child's best interests, and to pay attention to the circumstances of each individual case.
Prepoved izdaje odločb o vrnitvi mladoletnikom brez spremstva, ki obstaja v nacionalni zakonodaji več držav članic, ne zagotavlja polnega učinka obveznosti držav članic, da ustrezno upoštevajo otrokovo korist in okoliščine posameznega primera.
Such prohibitions can create unintended consequences for illegal immigration, inciting unaccompanied minors to embark on perilous journeys in order to reach the Union.
Take prepovedi imajo lahko nepredvidene posledice za nezakonito priseljevanje, saj spodbujajo mladoletnike brez spremstva k nevarnim potovanjem v Unijo.
Decisions on the legal status and on the return of unaccompanied minors should always be based on individual, multi-disciplinary and robust assessments of their best interests, including family tracing and home assessment.
Odločitve o pravnem statusu in vračanju mladoletnikov brez spremstva bi morale vedno temeljiti na posameznih, večdisciplinarnih in zanesljivih ocenah otrokove koristi, vključno z iskanjem družine in oceno doma.
Such assessment should be adequately documented.
Tako oceno bi bilo treba ustrezno dokumentirati.
In line with Article 17 of Directive 2008/115/EC which defines the conditions under which Member States can use detention in relation to unaccompanied minors and of families with minors as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time, Member States should ensure the availability of alternatives to detention for children.
V skladu s členom 17 Direktive 2008/115/ES, ki določa pogoje, pod katerimi lahko države članice pridržijo mladoletnike brez spremstva in družine z mladoletniki le, ko so izrabljena vsa druga sredstva in za najkrajše ustrezno obdobje, bi morale države članice zagotoviti razpoložljivost drugih možnosti za pridržanje otrok.
Where however, no such alternatives exist, an absolute prohibition of detention in such cases, may not give full effect to the obligation to take all necessary measures to ensure return, leading to annulment of return operations due to absconding.
Kadar pa ni nobenih takih možnosti, popolna prepoved pridržanja v takih primerih morda ne bi zagotovila polnega učinka obveznosti glede sprejetja vseh potrebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev vrnitve, kar bi lahko privedlo do preklica operacij vračanja zaradi pobega.
Pending the adoption of proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals [10], Member States should make full use of the possibility to enter an alert on entry ban in accordance with Article 24(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11].
Do sprejetja predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi schengenskega informacijskega sistema za vračanje nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav [10] bi morale države članice v celoti izkoristiti možnost, da vnesejo razpis ukrepa zaradi prepovedi vstopa v skladu s členom 24(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11].
This Recommendation should be addressed to all Member States bound by Directive 2008/115/EC.
To priporočilo bi bilo treba nasloviti na vse države članice, ki jih zavezuje Direktiva 2008/115/ES.
Member States should instruct their national authorities competent for carrying out return-related tasks to apply this Recommendation when performing their duties.
Države članice bi morale svojim nacionalnim organom, pristojnim za opravljanje nalog v zvezi z vračanjem, naročiti, da pri tem uporabljajo to priporočilo.
This Recommendation complies with the fundamental rights and the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
To priporočilo spoštuje temeljne pravice in načela iz Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
In particular, this Recommendation ensures the full respect for human dignity and the application of Articles 1, 4, 14, 18, 19, 24 and 47 of the Charter and has to be implemented accordingly,
Zlasti zagotavlja popolno spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva in uporabo členov 1, 4, 14, 18, 19, 24 in 47 Listine ter ga je treba ustrezno izvajati –
REINFORCED AND BETTER RETURN CAPACITIES
VEČJE IN BOLJŠE ZMOGLJIVOSTI ZA VRAČANJE
To address the procedural, technical, and operational obstacles to more effective returns, Member States should by 1 June 2017 reinforce their capacity to carry out the return of illegally staying third-country nationals by ensuring an integrated and coordinated approach.
Da bi države članice obravnavale postopkovne, tehnične in operativne ovire za učinkovitejše vrnitve, bi morale do 1. junija 2017 povečati zmogljivosti za vračanje nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav z zagotavljanjem celovitega in usklajenega pristopa.
The objectives of such an integrated and coordinated approach in the area of return should be to:
Cilji takega celovitega in usklajenega pristopa na področju vračanja bi morali biti:
ensure swift return procedures and substantially increase the rate of return;
zagotoviti hitre postopke vračanja in znatno povišati stopnjo vračanja;
mobilise, as needed, law enforcement and immigration authorities, and coordinate actions with judicial authorities, detention authorities, guardianship systems, medical and social services, to ensure availability of swift and adequate multi-disciplinary responses from all authorities involved in the return procedures;
po potrebi mobilizirati organe kazenskega pregona in organe za priseljevanje ter usklajevati ukrepe s sodnimi organi, organi za pridržanje, sistemi skrbništva ter zdravstvenimi in socialnimi službami, da se zagotovijo hitri in ustrezni večdisciplinarni odzivi vseh organov, vključenih v postopke vračanja;
ensure that a sufficient number of trained and competent staff, from all authorities with competences in the return procedures, are available to respond swiftly, and if necessary on a 24/7 basis, particularly when facing an increasing burden in implementing the obligation to return illegally staying third-country nationals;
zagotoviti zadostno izobraženo in usposobljeno osebje iz vseh organov, pristojnih za postopke vračanja, ki se lahko hitro in po potrebi vedno odzove, zlasti v primeru vse večjega bremena pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti glede vračanja nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav;
depending on the specific situation of the Member State, deploy additional staff at the external borders of the Union with the mandate and capacity to take immediate measures to determine and verify the identity and the legal status of the third-country nationals and immediately refuse entry or issue return decisions to those who have no right to enter or to stay in the Union.
glede na razmere v posamezni državi članici napotiti dodatno osebje na zunanjih mejah Unije, ki ima pooblastila in zmogljivosti, da sprejme takojšnje ukrepe za ugotavljanje in preverjanje istovetnosti in pravnega statusa državljanov tretjih držav ter takoj zavrne vstop ali izda odločbe o vrnitvi tistim, ki nimajo pravice do vstopa v Unijo ali prebivanja v njej.
The integrated and coordinated approach in the area of return should fulfil, in particular, the following tasks:
V okviru celovitega in usklajenega pristopa na področju vračanja bi bilo treba zlasti:
carry out swift medical examinations to avoid potential abuses in the situations referred to in point 9(b);
izvajati hitre zdravniške preglede, da bi se preprečile morebitne zlorabe v primerih iz točke 9(b);
liaise and exchange relevant operational information with other Member States and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency for the fulfilment of their objectives and tasks;
sodelovati in si izmenjevati ustrezne operativne informacije z drugimi državami članicami ter Evropsko agencijo za mejno in obalno stražo za izpolnitev njihovih ciljev in nalog;
make full use of the relevant IT systems, such as Eurodac, the Schengen Information System (SIS) and the Visa Information System (VIS), to obtain timely information on the identity and legal situation of the third-country nationals concerned.
v celoti izkoristiti ustrezne informacijske sisteme, kot so Eurodac, schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS) in vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS), za pravočasno pridobivanje informacij o istovetnosti in pravnem položaju zadevnih državljanov tretjih držav.
Member States should ensure that units or bodies tasked to ensure the integrated and coordinated approach are allocated all the necessary human, financial and material resources.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da imajo enote ali organi, odgovorni za zagotavljanje celovitega in usklajenega pristopa, vse potrebne človeške, finančne in materialne vire.
SYSTEMATIC ISSUANCE OF RETURN DECISIONS
SISTEMATIČNO IZDAJANJE ODLOČB O VRNITVI
For the purpose of ensuring that return decisions are systematically issued to third-country nationals who either do not have or no longer have a right to stay in the European Union, Member States should:
Za zagotovitev sistematičnega izdajanja odločb o vrnitvi državljanom tretjih držav, ki nimajo ali nimajo več pravice prebivati v Evropski uniji, bi morale države članice:
put in place measures to effectively locate and apprehend third-country nationals staying illegally;
uvesti ukrepe za učinkovito iskanje in prijetje nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav;
issue return decisions regardless of whether the illegally staying third-country national holds an identity or travel document;
izdajati odločbe o vrnitvi ne glede na to, ali imajo nezakonito prebivajoči državljani tretjih držav osebni dokument ali potno listino;
make the best use of the possibility provided for in Article 6(6) of Directive 2008/115/EC to combine in one act or to adopt simultaneously the decision on the ending of a legal stay and the return decision, provided that the relevant safeguards and provisions for each individual decision are respected.
čim bolj izkoristiti možnost iz člena 6(6) Direktive 2008/115/ES, da v enem pravnem aktu združijo ali hkrati sprejmejo odločitev o prenehanju zakonitega prebivanja in odločbo o vrnitvi, pod pogojem, da se za vsako odločitev oziroma odločbo spoštujejo ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi in določbe.
Member States should ensure that return decisions have unlimited duration, so that they can be enforced at any moment without the need to re-launch return procedures after a certain period of time.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da so odločbe o vrnitvi časovno neomejene, tako da jih je mogoče izvršiti kadar koli, ne da bi bilo treba po določenem času ponovno začeti postopke vračanja.
This should be without prejudice to the obligation to take into account any change in the individual situation of the third-country nationals concerned, including the risk of refoulement.
To ne bi smelo posegati v obveznost glede upoštevanja kakršnih koli sprememb položaja zadevnih državljanov tretjih držav, vključno z nevarnostjo vrnitve.
Member States should systematically introduce in return decisions the information that third-country nationals must leave the territory of the Member State to reach a third country, to deter and prevent unauthorised secondary movements.
Države članice bi morale v odločbah o vrnitvi sistematično uvajati informacije, da morajo državljani tretjih držav zapustiti ozemlje države članice in odpotovati v tretjo državo, z namenom odvračanja od nedovoljenega sekundarnega gibanja in njegovega preprečevanja.