natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 606/2010 of 9 July 2010 on the approval of a simplified tool developed by the European organisation for air safety navigation (Eurocontrol) to estimate the fuel consumption of certain small emitting aircraft operators (OJ L 175, 10.7.2010, p. 25).’;
Glede na rok za predajo 30. aprila 2018, kot je določen v Direktivi 2003/87/ES, je bistveno, da se zagotovi pravna varnost za operatorje zrakoplovov in nacionalne organe.
The 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) took place in Paris from 30 November to 12 December 2015.
Ustrezno bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Regulation (EU) 2017/2393 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2017/2393 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), (EU) No 1306/2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy, (EU) No 1307/2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy, (EU) No 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and (EU) No 652/2014 laying down provisions for the management of expenditure relating to the food chain, animal health and animal welfare, and relating to plant health and plant reproductive material
o spremembi uredb (EU) št. 1305/2013 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), (EU) št. 1306/2013 o financiranju, upravljanju in spremljanju skupne kmetijske politike, (EU) št. 1307/2013 o pravilih za neposredna plačila kmetom na podlagi shem podpore v okviru skupne kmetijske politike, (EU) št. 1308/2013 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov kmetijskih proizvodov in (EU) št. 652/2014 o določbah za upravljanje odhodkov v zvezi s prehransko verigo, zdravjem in dobrobitjo živali ter v zvezi z zdravjem rastlin in rastlinskim razmnoževalnim materialom
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 42, Article 43(2) and point (b) of Article 168(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 42, člena 43(2) in točke (b) člena 168(4) Pogodbe,
In order to ensure legal certainty and harmonised and non-discriminatory implementation of support to young farmers, it is necessary to provide that in the context of rural development the ‘date of setting up’, referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] and in other relevant rules, means the date when the applicant performs or completes an action related to the setting up for the first time and that the application for support is to be submitted at the latest 24 months after that date.
Za zagotovitev pravne varnosti ter usklajenega in nediskriminatornega izvajanja podpore mladim kmetom je treba določiti, da v okviru razvoja podeželja „datum vzpostavitve“ iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5] in drugih relevantnih pravil pomeni datum, ko vlagatelj začne ali zaključi dejanje, povezano s prvo vzpostavitvijo, in da je treba vlogo za podporo vložiti najpozneje 24 mesecev po tem datumu.
Moreover, experience from the negotiations of the programmes has shown that the rules for the joint setting up of young farmers and the thresholds for access to support required under Article 19(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 should be clarified, and that the provisions on the duration of the business plan should be streamlined.
Poleg tega se je na podlagi izkušenj iz pogajanj o programih pokazalo, da bi bilo treba pojasniti pravila za skupno vzpostavitev mladih kmetov in pragove za dostop do podpore, ki jih zahteva člen 19(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, ter poenostaviti določbe o trajanju poslovnega načrta.
In order to facilitate implementation of advisory and training services by Member States' Managing Authorities, the status of beneficiary under that measure should be extended to those authorities, while at the same time ensuring that the provider of the service is chosen by a body functionally independent from those authorities and that checks are carried out at the level of the provider of advice or training.
Da bi organi upravljanja držav članic lažje izvajali storitve svetovanja in usposabljanja, bi bilo treba status upravičenca v okviru tega ukrepa razširiti na navedene organe, hkrati pa zagotoviti, da za izbiro subjekta, ki zagotavlja storitve, poskrbi organ, ki je funkcionalno neodvisen od navedenih organov, in da se pregledi izvajajo na ravni subjekta, ki zagotavlja svetovanje ali usposabljanje.
With a view to incentivising participation in quality schemes, farmers or groups of farmers taking part in such schemes in the five years preceding the application for support should be eligible for a maximum duration of five years, while duly taking into account the time of the initial participation in the scheme.
Da bi spodbujali sodelovanje v shemah kakovosti, bi morali biti kmetje ali skupine kmetov, ki v teh shemah sodelujejo v petih letih pred predložitvijo vloge za podporo, upravičeni največ pet let, in sicer ob ustreznem upoštevanju trenutka prve udeležbe v shemi.
In order to be sufficiently attractive to the private sector, it is essential that financial instruments are designed and implemented in a flexible and transparent manner.
Da bi bili finančni instrumenti dovolj zanimivi za zasebni sektor, bi jih bilo treba zasnovati in izvrševati prožno in pregledno.
However, experience has shown that certain measure-specific eligibility rules limit the uptake of financial instruments in the rural development programmes, as well as the flexible use of financial instruments by fund managers.
Vendar so izkušnje pokazale, da nekatera pravila glede upravičenosti v zvezi s posameznim ukrepom omejujejo črpanje sredstev iz finančnih instrumentov v okviru programov razvoja podeželja, pa tudi prožnost uporabe finančnih instrumentov s strani upravljavcev skladov.
Therefore, it is appropriate to provide that certain measure-specific eligibility rules do not apply to financial instruments.
Zato je ustrezno določiti, da se nekatera pravila glede upravičenosti v zvezi s posameznim ukrepom ne uporabljajo za finančne instrumente.
For the same reason, it is also appropriate to provide that start-up aid to young farmers under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 may also be provided in the form of financial instruments.
Iz istega razloga je ustrezno tudi določiti, da se pomoč mladim kmetom za zagon v skladu s členom 19 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 lahko dodeli tudi v obliki finančnih instrumentov.
In view of those changes, it should be provided that, where support for investments under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 is granted in the form of financial instruments, the investment must contribute to one or more Union priorities for rural development.
Ob upoštevanju teh sprememb bi bilo treba določiti, da kadar se podpora za naložbe v skladu s členom 17 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 odobri v obliki finančnih instrumentov, mora naložba prispevati k eni ali več prednostnim nalogam Unije za razvoj podeželja.
In order to reduce administrative burden in relation to the implementation of the principle of no double funding in relation to greening, Member States should be given the possibility of applying a fixed, average deduction to all beneficiaries concerned carrying out the type of operation or sub-measure concerned.
Da bi se zmanjšalo upravno breme v zvezi z izvajanjem načela o preprečevanju dvojnega financiranja v zvezi z zeleno komponento, bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da uporabijo fiksni povprečni odbitek za vse zadevne upravičence, ki izvajajo zadevno vrsto operacije ali podukrepa.
Nowadays farmers are exposed to increasing economic risks as a consequence of market developments.
Dandanes so kmetje izpostavljeni vse večjim ekonomskim tveganjem zaradi sprememb na trgu.
However, those economic risks do not affect all agricultural sectors equally.
Vendar ta ekonomska tveganja ne vplivajo enako na vse sektorje kmetijstva.
Consequently, Member States should have the possibility, in duly justified cases, to help farmers by means of a sector-specific income stabilisation tool, in particular for sectors affected by a severe income drop, which would have a significant economic impact for a specific rural area, provided that the drop in income exceeds a threshold of at least 20 %.
Zato bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih kmetom pomagajo s pomočjo instrumenta za stabilizacijo dohodka za posamezni sektor, zlasti za sektorje, za katere so značilna znatna zmanjšanja dohodka, ki bi imela močan ekonomski učinek na posamezno podeželsko območje, pod pogojem, da zmanjšanje dohodka presega prag vsaj 20 %.
In order to ensure that the sector-specific income stabilisation tool is effective and adapted to Member States' specific circumstances, it should be possible for them to define, in their rural development programmes, the income to be taken into account for the activation of the tool, in a flexible manner.
Za zagotovitev, da bo instrument za stabilizacijo dohodka za posamezni sektor učinkovit in prilagojen posebnim okoliščinam držav članic, bi morale te imeti možnost, da v svojih programih za razvoj podeželja določijo dohodek, ki ga je treba upoštevati za prožno uporabo instrumenta.
At the same time, and in order to promote the use of insurance by farmers, the threshold for the drop in production applicable for insurance should be reduced to 20 %.
Obenem in zato, da bi spodbudili uporabo zavarovanj s strani kmetov, bi bilo treba prag upada proizvodnje, ki se uporablja za ta zavarovanja, zmanjšati za 20 %.
In addition, in order to monitor the expenditure made under the sector-specific income stabilisation tool and insurance, the content of the financial plan of the programme should be adapted.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba zaradi spremljanja izdatkov v okviru instrumenta za stabilizacijo dohodka za posamezni sektor in zavarovanj prilagoditi vsebino finančnega načrta programa.
The specific reporting requirement for the risk management measure in 2018 referred to in Article 36(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 is already covered by the report to the European Parliament and the Council on the monitoring and evaluation of the common agricultural policy (CAP) referred to in Article 110(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6].
Zahteva po posebnem poročanju za ukrep obvladovanja tveganja v letu 2018 iz člena 36(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 je že zajeta v poročilu Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o spremljanju in vrednotenju skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) iz člena 110(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6].
Therefore, the second subparagraph of Article 36(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 should be deleted.
Zato bi bilo treba drugi pododstavek člena 36(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 črtati.
With regard to mutual funds for farmers of all sectors, it appears that the prohibition of any contribution by public funds to initial capital stock laid down in Article 38(3) and Article 39(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 hinders the effective functioning of those funds.
Kar zadeva vzajemne sklade za kmete v vseh sektorjih, se zdi, da prepoved kakršnih koli prispevkov javnih skladov za začetni kapital, kot je določena v členu 38(3) in členu 39(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, ovira uspešno delovanje teh skladov.
That prohibition should therefore be deleted.
To prepoved bi bilo zato treba črtati.
It is also appropriate to expand the areas that can be covered by financial contributions to mutual funds, so that contributions can supplement the annual payments into the funds, as well as relate to their initial capital stock.
Prav tako je ustrezno razširiti področja, ki se lahko krijejo s finančnimi prispevki v vzajemne sklade, tako da prispevki lahko dopolnjujejo letna plačila v sklade ter se nanašajo na začetni kapital teh skladov.
Support for investments for the restoration of production potential after natural disasters and catastrophic events under point (b) of Article 18(1) and point (d) of Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 is usually granted to all eligible applicants.
Podpora naložbam za obnovo potenciala kmetijske proizvodnje po naravnih nesrečah in katastrofičnih dogodkih iz točke (b) člena 18(1) in točke (d) člena 24(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 se običajno dodeljuje vsem upravičenim vložnikom.
Therefore, Member States should not be obliged to define selection criteria for restoration operations.
Zato za države članice ne bi smelo biti obvezno, da določijo merila za izbor operacij obnove.
Moreover, in duly justified cases, where it is not possible to define selection criteria due to the nature of the operations, Member States should be allowed to define alternative selection methods.
Poleg tega bi morale imeti države članice v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih, če ni mogoče določiti meril za izbor zaradi narave operacij, možnost, da določijo alternativne izbirne metode.
Article 59 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 defines the maximum European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) contribution rates.
Člen 59 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 določa najvišje stopnje prispevkov Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP).
In order to ease the pressure on the national budget of some Member States and to accelerate much-needed investments in Cyprus, the maximum contribution rate of 100 % referred to in point (f) of Article 59(4) of that Regulation should be extended until the programme closure.
Da se sprosti pritisk na nacionalne proračune nekaterih držav članic in pospešijo zelo potrebne naložbe na Cipru, bi bilo treba najvišjo stopnjo prispevka v višini 100 % iz točke (f) člena 59(4) navedene uredbe podaljšati do zaključka programa.
In addition, a reference to the specific contribution rate introduced in Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [7] for the new financial instrument referred to in point (c) of Article 38(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 should be mentioned in Article 59(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba v členu 59(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 navesti sklic na posebno stopnjo prispevka, ki jo Uredba (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7] uvaja za novi finančni instrument iz točke (c) člena 38(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.
Pursuant to Article 60(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, in cases of emergency measures due to natural disasters, eligibility of expenditure relating to programme changes may start from the date when the natural disaster occurred.
V skladu s členom 60(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 se lahko v primerih nujnih ukrepov zaradi naravnih nesreč upravičenost izdatkov v zvezi s spremembami programa začne z datumom pojava naravne nesreče.
That possibility to make eligible expenditure made before the submission of a programme amendment should be extended to other circumstances, such as catastrophic events or a significant and sudden change in the socioeconomic conditions of the Member State or region.
To možnost, tj. da je lahko upravičen tudi izdatek, ki je nastal pred predložitvijo spremembe programa, bi bilo treba razširiti na druge okoliščine, kot so katastrofični dogodki ali znatne in nenadne spremembe glede socialno-ekonomskih okoliščin v državi članici ali regiji.
Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 60(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, in respect of investments in the agricultural sector, only expenditure incurred after the submission of an application is eligible.
Na podlagi drugega pododstavka člena 60(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, kar zadeva naložbe v kmetijstvu, za upravičene štejejo le izdatki, ki so nastali po predložitvi vloge.
In cases, however, where the investment is related to emergency measures due to natural disasters, catastrophic events or adverse climatic events or a significant and sudden change in the socioeconomic conditions of the Member State or region, Member States should be given the possibility to provide in their programmes that expenditure incurred after the occurrence of the event is eligible, in order to ensure their flexible and timely reaction to such events.
Vendar pa bi v primerih, ko se naložbe nanašajo na nujne ukrepe zaradi naravnih nesreč, katastrofičnih dogodkov ali slabih vremenskih razmer ali znatnih in nenadnih sprememb glede socialno-ekonomskih okoliščin v državi članici ali regiji, države članice morale imeti možnost, da v svojem programu določijo, da so izdatki, ki so nastali po dogodku, upravičeni, in sicer zaradi zagotovitve prožnega in pravočasnega odziva na take dogodke.
In order to provide efficient support to emergency operations undertaken by the Member States in response to events which occurred in recent years, that possibility should apply from 1 January 2016.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito podporo nujnim ukrepom, ki so jih države članice opravile v odgovor na dogodke, ki so se zgodili v zadnjih letih, bi se morala ta možnost uporabljati od 1. januarja 2016.
In order to increase the use of the simplified cost options referred to in points (b) to (d) of Article 67(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, it is necessary to limit the EAFRD-specific rules laid down in Article 62(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 to aid granted in accordance with points (a) and (b) of Article 21(1), concerning income foregone and maintenance costs, and with Articles 28 to 31, 33 and 34 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
Da bi se povečala uporaba možnosti poenostavljenega obračunavanja stroškov iz točk (b) do (d) člena 67(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, bi bilo treba omejiti posebna pravila za EKSRP iz člena 62(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 za pomoč, ki se dodeli v skladu s točkama (a) in (b) člena 21(1) v zvezi z izpadom dohodka in stroški vzdrževanja ter v skladu s členi 28 do 31, 33 in 34 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013.
Article 74 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 requires the Member States to consult the Monitoring Committee of the rural development programme on the selection criteria within four months from the approval of the programme.
Člen 74 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 od držav članic zahteva, da se v štirih mesecih po odobritvi programa posvetujejo z odborom za spremljanje programa razvoja podeželja v zvezi z merili za izbor.
This creates an indirect obligation for the Member States to have defined all the selection criteria by that date even for the calls for applications which will be launched subsequently.
To za države članice ustvarja posredno obveznost, da do tega datuma določijo vsa merila za izbor, tudi za povabila k oddaji prijave, ki se bodo šele objavila.
In order to reduce unnecessary administrative burden, whilst ensuring that financial resources are used in the best possible way, Member States should be allowed to define the selection criteria and to ask for the opinion of the Monitoring Committee at any time before the publication of the calls for applications.
Za zmanjšanje nepotrebnega upravnega bremena ob zagotavljanju, da se finančni viri porabljajo na najboljši možni način, bi moralo biti državam članicam dovoljeno, da kadar koli pred objavo povabil k oddaji prijave določijo merila za izbor in odbor za spremljanje zaprosijo za mnenje.
With a view to increasing the use of crop, animal and plant insurance, and of mutual funds and the income stabilisation tool, the maximum percentage of initial public support should be increased from 65 % to 70 %.
Da bi povečali uporabo zavarovanja pridelka, živali in rastlin ter vzajemnih skladov in instrumenta za stabilizacijo dohodka, bi bilo treba najvišji odstotek prve javne podpore nekoliko povečati, in sicer s 65 % na 70 %.
Financial discipline is used to ensure that the budget for the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) complies with the respective annual ceilings of the multiannual financial framework and to establish the reserve for crises in the agricultural sector.
Finančna disciplina se uporablja, da se zagotovi skladnost proračuna za Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS) s posameznimi letnimi zgornjimi mejami večletnega finančnega okvirja ter se določi rezerva za krizne razmere v kmetijskem sektorju.
Given the technical character of the determination of the adjustment rate for direct payments and its inherent links with the Commission's estimates of expenditure set out in its annual draft budget, the procedure for setting the adjustment rate should be simplified by authorising the Commission to adopt it in accordance with the advisory procedure.
Ker je določitev prilagoditvene stopnje za neposredna plačila tehnične narave in neločljivo povezana z načrti odhodkov, ki jih Komisija določi v svojem letnem predlogu proračuna, bi bilo treba poenostaviti postopek za določitev te stopnje, in sicer bi bilo treba Komisijo pooblastiti, da jo sprejme v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom.
In order to harmonise the rules on automatic decommitment set out in Article 87 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 and Article 38 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, the date by which Member States have to send to the Commission information on exceptions to the decommitment referred to in Article 38(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 should be adapted.
Da se uskladijo pravila o samodejnem prenehanju prevzetih obveznosti iz člena 87 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 in člena 38 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013, bi bilo treba prilagoditi datum, do katerega morajo države članice Komisiji poslati informacije o izjemah k prenehanju obveznosti iz člena 38(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013.
In order to provide for legal clarity as regards the treatment of the recoveries generated from the temporary reductions under Article 41(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, the latter should be included in the list of sources of the assigned revenue under Article 43 of that Regulation.
Da se zagotovi pravna jasnost v zvezi z obravnavo izterjav, nastalih iz začasnih zmanjšanj v skladu s členom 41(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013, bi morale biti te izterjave vključene na seznam virov namenskih prejemkov v skladu s členom 43 navedene uredbe.
In the interests of administrative simplification, it is appropriate to increase the threshold below which Member States may decide not to pursue recovery of undue payments from EUR 150 to EUR 250 provided that the Member State applies an equal or higher threshold for not pursuing national debts.
Zaradi upravne poenostavitve je ustrezno povečati prag, pod katerim se – če se države članice tako odločijo – postopek izterjave neupravičeno izplačanih zneskov opusti, in sicer s 150 EUR na 250 EUR, pod pogojem, da država članica za opustitev izterjave javnih dolgov uporablja enak ali višji prag.
It is appropriate to ensure that the refusal or recovery of payments as a result of non-compliance with public procurement rules reflects the gravity of such non-compliance and respects the principle of proportionality, as expressed, for example, in the relevant guidelines established by the Commission for financial corrections to be made to expenditure financed by the Union under shared management for non-compliance with such rules.
Ustrezno je zagotoviti, da zavrnitev ali izterjava plačil zaradi neizpolnjevanja pravil o javnem naročanju odraža resnost takšnega neizpolnjevanja in spoštuje načelo sorazmernosti, kot je izraženo na primer v ustreznih smernicah, ki jih je določila Komisija za finančne popravke, ki jih je treba izvesti za odhodke, ki jih financira Unija v okviru deljenega upravljanja zaradi neizpolnjevanja takšnih pravil.
It is further appropriate to clarify that such non-compliance affects the legality and regularity of the transactions only up to the level of the part of the aid not to be paid or to be withdrawn.
Ustrezno je tudi pojasniti, da takšno neizpolnjevanje vpliva na zakonitost in pravilnost transakcij samo do višine dela pomoči, ki se ne izplača ali ki se ukine.