natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Economic situation of the Union industry
Obseg prodaje in tržni delež industrije Unije sta se v obravnavanem obdobju gibala na naslednji način:
General remarks
Preglednica 6a
In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined all economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry during the period considered.
Moduli – obseg prodaje in tržni delež
For the injury analysis, the Commission distinguished between macroeconomic and microeconomic injury indicators.
Celotni obseg prodaje (zaprti in odprti trg) v Uniji (v MW)
The Commission evaluated the macroeconomic indicators on the basis of data obtained from the applicant, cross-checked with the standing replies sent by a number of Union producers at pre-initiation stage and the verified questionnaire replies of the sampled Union producers.
Preglednica 6b
The Commission evaluated the microeconomic indicators on the basis of data contained in the questionnaire replies from the sampled Union producers.
Celice – obseg prodaje in tržni delež
The macroeconomic indicators are: production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales volume, market share, growth, employment, productivity, magnitude of the dumping margin, and recovery from past dumping.
Obseg prodaje modulov se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 40 %.
The microeconomic indicators are: average unit prices, unit cost, labour costs, inventories, profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investments, and ability to raise capital.
Vendar je to glede na 56-odstotno zmanjšanje potrošnje pomenilo znatno povečanje tržnega deleža v obravnavanem obdobju, in sicer za 40 %, tako da je ta dosegel 35 % v OPP.
Macroeconomic indicators
V zvezi s celicami se je obseg prodaje industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 9 %.
Production, production capacity and capacity utilisation
To je povzročilo povečanje tržnega deleža s 23 % leta 2012 na 33 % v OPP, medtem ko se je potrošnja zmanjšala mnogo manj kot za module, tj. za 26 %.
The total Union production, production capacity and capacity utilisation developed over the period considered as follows:
Industriji Unije je kljub zmanjševanju potrošnje in uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov uspelo povečati svoj tržni delež za module in celice.
Table 5a
Zaposlenost in produktivnost
Modules — production, production capacity and capacity utilisation
Zaposlenost in produktivnost sta se v obravnavanem obdobju gibali na naslednji način:
Source: Europressedienst, standing replies, verified questionnaire replies.
Preglednica 7a
Production volume (MW)
Moduli – zaposlenost in produktivnost
Production capacity (MW)
Število zaposlenih
Capacity utilisation (%)
Produktivnost (kW/zaposlenega)
Table 5b
Preglednica 7b
Cells — production, production capacity and capacity utilisation
Celice – zaposlenost in produktivnost
The overall Union production of modules decreased by 26 % during the period considered, but increased by 4,5 % between 2014 and the RIP.
Zaposlenost se je med letom 2012 in OPP zmanjšala za 64 % za module in za 38 % za celice.
Against the drop in consumption, production capacity responded to the trend of decreasing production and also decreased by 25 % during the period considered.
V zvezi z moduli se je število zaposlenih najbolj zmanjšalo (za 53 %) med letoma 2013 in 2014, kar je mnogo večje zmanjšanje kot upad proizvodnje v enakem obdobju (za 27 %).
Hence, the capacity utilisation rate remained stable between the beginning and the end of the period considered, reaching 53 % during the RIP.
V zvezi s celicami se je število zaposlenih med letoma 2013 in 2014 povečalo za 22 %, kar je bilo mnogo manj od povečanja proizvodnje, ki se je v istem obdobju povečala za 49 %.
However, there was a major increase in capacity utilisation by 9 percentage points between 2014 and the RIP (i.e. an increase by 19 %).
To je povzročilo znatno povečanje produktivnosti za module in celice v obravnavanem obdobju, in sicer za 103 % oziroma 94 %.
It should be noted that the sampled Union module producers had much higher capacity utilisation rate during the period considered, reaching 85 % during the RIP, an increase by 39 % in comparison with 2012 (61 %).
Med letoma 2013 in 2014 se je produktivnost povečala za 57 % za module in za 22 % za celice.
The Union production of cells increased by 19 % during the period considered.
Po razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran izpodbijala ugotovitve Komisije v zvezi s številom zaposlenih v industriji Unije, pri čemer je trdila, da je prišlo do dvojnega štetja zaposlenih v proizvodnji celic in modulov največje družbe, tj. SolarWorld.
While production fell by 31 % between 2012 and 2013, it increased by 49 % between 2013 and 2014 and by further 15 % between 2014 and the RIP.
Podatki o številu zaposlenih družbe SolarWorld in vseh drugih vzorčenih družb so bili ustrezno preverjeni in zagotovljeno je bilo, da v primeru vertikalno integriranih družb noben zaposleni ni bil štet dvakrat.
This coincided with the imposition of the anti-dumping measures in December 2013, while consumption constantly decreased in the period between 2012 and 2014, but increased between 2014 and the RIP.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
At the same time production capacity decreased by 24 % during the period considered, which led to a significant increase of capacity utilisation, from 45 % in 2012 to 70 % in the RIP.
Višina stopnje dampinga in okrevanje po preteklem dampingu
Similarly to module producers, the sampled cells producers had much higher capacity utilisation rate than the overall Union industry (86 %), which remained stable during the period considered.
Kot je pojasnjeno v oddelku 3.2.3 zgoraj, so v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zaveze vplivale na izvozne cene proizvajalcev izvoznikov, zato niso bile dovolj zanesljive za ugotovitev, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping nadaljeval ali ponovno pojavil, če se dovoli iztek veljavnosti protidampinških ukrepov.
In conclusion, the Union industry decreased its capacity in response to a decrease in consumption.
Vendar analiza kazalnikov škode kaže, da so uvedeni ukrepi pozitivno vplivali na industrijo Unije, za katero se je štelo, da okreva od učinkov preteklega dampinga.
At the same time it increased its production during the RIP in comparison with 2014 which further improved the capacity utilisation rate.
Mikroekonomski kazalniki
Sales volume and market share
Vzorčeni so bili samo trije proizvajalci celic, od katerih sta dva člana združenja EU ProSun.
The Union industry's sales volume and market share developed over the period considered as follows:
Sodelovala sta pri vložitvi zahtevka, ki je vseboval podatke obeh proizvajalcev.
Table 6a
Zato so vsi podatki, povezani z mikroekonomskimi kazalniki za celice, ki jim je mogoče slediti neposredno do tretje družbe, ki ni članica EU ProSun, navedeni v razponih, da se zaščiti zaupnost tega proizvajalca Unije, ki je sodeloval v preiskavi.
Modules — sales volume and market share
Cene in dejavniki, ki vplivajo nanje
Total sales volume (captive and open market) in the Union (MW)
Povprečna prodajna cena na enoto vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije pri prodaji nepovezanim strankam v Uniji se je v obravnavanem obdobju gibala na naslednji način:
Table 6b
Preglednica 8a
Cells — sales volume and market share
Moduli – prodajne cene v Uniji
During the period considered the sales volumes of modules decreased by 40 %.
Vir: Preverjeni izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
However, in the context of a decrease in consumption by 56 %, this translated into a significant increase in market share during the period considered by 40 %, reaching 35 % during the RIP.
Povprečne prodajne cene na prostem trgu Unije (EUR/kW)
Regarding cells, the Union industry's sales volumes increased by 9 % during the period considered.
Proizvodni stroški na enoto (v EUR/kW)
This resulted in an increase in market share from 23 % in 2012 to 33 % during the RIP, while consumption decreased much less than for modules, i.e. by 26 %.
Preglednica 8b
In the context of a shrinking consumption and the entry into force of the anti-dumping measures, the Union industry managed to increase its market share for both modules and cells.
Celice – prodajne cene v Uniji
Employment and productivity
378–418
Employment and productivity developed over the period considered as follows:
307–339
Table 7a
239–264
Modules — employment and productivity
258–284
Number of employees
587–648
Productivity (kW/employee)
402–444
Table 7b
V zgornji preglednici je prikazano gibanje prodajne cene na enoto na prostem trgu Unije v primerjavi z ustreznimi stroški proizvodnje.
Cells — employment and productivity
Prodajne cene so se v obravnavanem obdobju znatno znižale, in sicer cene modulov za 25 %, cene celic pa za 32 %.
Employment decreased between 2012 and the RIP for modules and cells by 64 % and 38 % respectively.
Medtem ko so se prodajne cene modulov v obravnavanem obdobju stalno nižale, so se prodajne cene celic med letom 2014 in OPP povišale za 5 odstotnih točk.
The main decrease (by 53 %) in the number of employees for modules took place between 2013 and 2014, a much bigger decrease in comparison with the drop in production during the same period (by 27 %).
Prodaja celic na odprtem trgu je zajemala manj kot 5 % celotne proizvodnje vzorčenih proizvajalcev, poleg tega pa je en proizvajalec prodal velike količine po zelo nizkih cenah v pričakovanju zaprtja podjetja v EU.
For cells, the number of employees increased by 22 % between 2013 and 2014, which was much less than the increase of production — by 49 % during the same period.
Zato na podlagi tega kazalnika ni bilo mogoče sprejeti smiselne ugotovitve.
This resulted in significant productivity increase for both modules and cells, i.e. by 103 % and 94 % respectively during the period considered.
Celice za lastno uporabo so se med nekaterimi vzorčenimi proizvajalci prenesle ali dobavile za proizvodnjo modulov z uporabo različne metodologije (določanje transfernih cen po navideznih tržnih cenah, prenos na podlagi dejanskih stroškov itd.).
Between 2013 and 2014 the productivity increase was by 57 % for modules and by 22 % for cells.
Zato na podlagi gibanja cen proizvodnje za lastno uporabo ni mogoče sprejeti smiselne ugotovitve.
Following disclosure, one interested party contested the Commission's findings on the number of employees employed in the Union industry, claiming that there had been double counting of employees of the cell and module manufacturing of the biggest company, SolarWorld.
Proizvodni stroški na enoto so se v obravnavanem obdobju močno znižali, in sicer za 46 % za module in za 42 % za celice.
The figures regarding the employees of SolarWorld and all other sampled companies have been duly verified and it has been ensured that no employees have been double counted in the case of vertically integrated companies.
Med letom 2013 in OPP se je torej razlika med prodajno ceno in proizvodnimi stroški močno zmanjšala, in sicer za 14 odstotnih točk.
Therefore, this argument was rejected.
Za celice je prodajna cena leta 2012 znašala 60 do 67 % proizvodnih stroškov na enoto, leta 2013 72 do 80 %, leta 2014 65 do 72 %, v OPP pa 72 do 79 %.
Magnitude of the dumping margin and recovery from past dumping
Vendar, kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, so leta 2014 in v OPP na ta trend močno vplivale izjemno nizke cene proizvajalca v Uniji.
As explained in Section 3.2.3 above, during the review investigation period the export prices of the exporting producers to the Union were influenced by the undertakings and therefore not reliable enough to be used for the determination whether dumping would be likely to continue or recur should the anti-dumping measures be allowed to lapse.
Za drugi dve vzorčeni družbi so deleži znašali 75 do 80 % leta 2014 in 81 do 86 % v OPP, kar je večinoma skladno s trendom, ugotovljenim za module.
However, the analysis of the injury indicators shows that the measures in place had a positive impact on the Union industry which is deemed to be recovering from the effect of past dumping.
Na splošno je industrija začela okrevati od preteklega dampinga in je povečala prizadevanja za ponovno pridobitev konkurenčnosti, zlasti s povečanjem produktivnosti delovne sile industrije Unije, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 141, kar je omogočilo povečanje produktivnosti in boljše izkoriščanje zmogljivosti.
Only three cell producers were sampled and two of them are members of EU ProSun.
Povprečni stroški dela vzorčenih proizvajalcev v Uniji so se v obravnavanem obdobju gibali na naslednji način:
Prices and factors affecting prices
Povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega (v EUR)
The average unit sales prices of the sampled Union producers to unrelated customers in the Union developed as follows over the period considered:
Preglednica 9b
Table 8a
Celice – povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega
Modules — sales prices in the Union
41289–45590
Source: verified questionnaire replies.
45002–49689
Average sales price in the Union on the free market (EUR/kW)
45188–49895
Unit cost of production (EUR/kW)
47825–52807
Table 8b
Med letom 2012 in OPP so se povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega za module in celice povišali za 16 %.
378-418
Zaloge
307-339
Ravni zalog vzorčenih proizvajalcev v Uniji so se v obravnavanem obdobju gibale na naslednji način:
239-264
Preglednica10a
258-284
Moduli – zaloge
587-648
Končne zaloge (v kW)
402-444
Končne zaloge kot delež proizvodnje (%)
347-384
Preglednica 10b
338-373
Celice – zaloge
The table above shows the evolution of the unit sales price on the Union free market as compared to the corresponding cost of production.
Končne zaloge (v MW)
Sales prices fell significantly, i.e. by 25 % for modules, and by 32 % for cells during the period considered.
53029–58553
While for modules sales prices fell continuously throughout the period considered, for cells they increased with 5 percentage points between 2014 and the RIP.
90079–99462
The sales of cells on the open market made up less than 5 % of the overall production of the sampled producers and in addition one producer sold large quantities at very low prices in anticipation of its business closure in the EU.
99999–110415
Therefore, no meaningful conclusion could be drawn from this indicator.
135492–149606
Among some sampled producers cells for captive consumption were transferred or delivered for the production of modules using different methodology (transfer pricing at virtual market price, transfer on the basis of the actual costs, etc.).
V obravnavanem obdobju so se zaloge modulov le nekoliko povečale, in sicer za 3 %, zaloge celic pa so se znatno povečale, in sicer za 156 %.
Therefore, no meaningful conclusion could be drawn from captive use price evolution, either.
Vendar so se zaloge kot odstotek celotne proizvodnje zmanjšale za 66 % za module in za 20 % za celice.
Unit cost of production fell sharply, i.e. by 46 % for modules and by 42 % for cells during the period considered.
Zalog ni mogoče obravnavati kot pomemben kazalnik škode v tem sektorju, saj proizvodnja in prodaja temeljita predvsem na naročilih, zato proizvajalci običajno vzdržujejo omejene zaloge.
Sales prices for modules have on average been lower than the unit cost of production, but the difference decreased continuously throughout the period considered, and especially after the imposition of the measures in 2013.
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe, donosnost naložb in zmožnost zbiranja kapitala
While the sales price was only 71 % of the unit cost of production for modules in 2012, it was 80 % in 2013, 94 % in 2014 and 94,5 % in the RIP.
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe in donosnost naložb vzorčenih proizvajalcev v Uniji so se v obravnavanem obdobju gibali na naslednji način:
Thus the difference between the sales price and the cost of production decreased steeply, by 14 percentage points, between 2013 and the RIP.
Preglednica 11a
For cells the sales price was 60 %-67 % of the unit cost of production in 2012, 72 %-80 % in 2013, 65 %-72 % in 2014 and 72-79 % in the RIP.
Moduli – dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe in donosnost naložb
However, as explained above for 2014 and the RIP the trend was strongly influenced by the exceptionally low prices of one Union producer.
Dobičkonosnost prodaje v Uniji nepovezanim strankam, vključno z družbo Jabil (v % prihodka od prodaje) [30]
For the other two sampled companies the trend was 75-80 % in 2014 and 81-86 % in the RIP, largely in line with the one observed for modules.
24,4/– 29,5
Overall, the industry started recovering from the past dumping but also made increased efforts to regain its competitiveness, in particular by increasing the productivity of the Union industry's workforce, as set out in recital 141, which resulted in productivity gains and in improved capacity utilisation.
6,8/– 8,2
Labour costs
7,7/– 9,3
The average labour costs of the sampled Union producers developed as follows over the period considered:
Dobičkonosnost prodaje v Uniji nepovezanim strankam, razen družbi Jabil (v % prihodka od prodaje)
Table 9a
Denarni tok (v EUR)
Modules — Average labour costs per employee
Naložbe (v EUR)
Average labour costs per employee (EUR)
Donosnost naložb (%)
Table 9b
Preglednica 11b
Cells — Average labour costs per employee
Celice – dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe in donosnost naložb
41289-45590
Dobičkonosnost prodaje v Uniji nepovezanim strankam (v % prihodka od prodaje)
45002-49689
37,7 – – 41,6
45188-49895
7,2 – – 7,9
47825-52807
26,6 – – 29,3
Between 2012 and the RIP the average labour costs per employee both for modules and cells increased by 16 %.
36,8 – – 40,7
These increases were mainly caused by the severance payments linked to the rationalisation of the number of employees and wage inflation.
41934911 – – 46303131
Inventories
17537454 – – 19364273
Stock levels of the sampled Union producers developed over the period considered as follows:
12414052 – – 13707182
Table 10a
29027946 – – 32051690
Modules — Inventories
29435820–32502051
Closing stocks (kW)
26074619–28790726
Closing stocks as a percentage of production (%)
7001485–7730807
Table 10b
11429509–12620083
Cells — Inventories
6,0 – – 6,7
Closing stocks (MW)
2,5 – – 2,7
53029-58553
24,6 – – 27,2
90079-99462
31,8 – – 35,1
99999-110415
Komisija je dobičkonosnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije določila tako, da je neto dobiček pred obdavčitvijo pri prodaji podobnega izdelka nepovezanim strankam v Uniji izrazila kot odstotek prihodkov od te prodaje.
135492-149606
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 110 zgoraj, ena vzorčena družba, in sicer Jabil, izvaja dejavnosti sestavljanja in ni vključena v dejavnost prodaje modulov.
During the period considered stocks slightly increased for modules by 3 % and increased significantly for cells by 156 %.
Njen trend dobičkonosnosti je bil drugačen.
However, for both modules and cells stocks decreased as a percentage of total production by 66 % and 20 % respectively.
V celotnem obravnavanem obdobju je poslovala z dobičkom in v OPP še povečala svojo dobičkonosnost, ki je dosegla 5–15 %.
Inventories cannot be considered as a relevant injury indicator in this sector, as production and sales are mainly based on orders and, accordingly, producers tend to hold limited stocks.
Vendar je družba Jabil dobiček ustvarila na podlagi plačil, ki jih je prejela od svojih strank za storitev sestavljanja modulov, in ne na podlagi njihove prodaje.