natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Crisis prevention and management measures should be extended to cover replenishment of mutual funds which could as new instruments help to combat crises, and to promotion and communication in order to diversify and consolidate the fruit and vegetables markets.
Ukrepe za preprečevanje kriz in njihovo obvladovanje bi bilo treba razširiti, da bi vključevali dopolnitev vzajemnih skladov, ki bi se lahko uporabili kot novi instrumenti za spopadanje s kriznimi razmerami, ter promocijo in obveščanje, da bi povečali raznolikost in utrdili trga sadja in zelenjave.
In order to simplify the current procedure of first authorising Member States to grant additional national financial assistance to producer organisations in regions of the Union where the degree of organisation is particularly low and second reimbursing a part of the national financial assistance if further conditions are complied with, a new system should be established for Member States where the degree of organisation is significantly below the Union average.
Za poenostavitev veljavnega postopka, po katerem se države članice najprej pooblastijo za dodeljevanje dodatne nacionalne finančne pomoči organizacijam proizvajalcev v regijah Unije, v katerih je raven organizacije posebej nizka, in nato povrne del nacionalne finančne pomoči, če so izpolnjeni nadaljnji pogoji, bi bilo treba vzpostaviti nov sistem za države članice, v katerih je raven organizacije znatno pod povprečjem Unije.
In order to ensure a smooth transition from the current procedure to the new system, a transitional period of one year should be provided for.
Za zagotovitev nemotenega prehoda z veljavnega postopka na novi sistem bi bilo treba določiti prehodno obdobje enega leta.
The new system should therefore become applicable from 1 January 2019.
Novi sistem bi se moral zato začeti uporabljati od 1. januarja 2019.
In order to ensure protection for wine spirits with a geographical indication against risks of misappropriation of reputation, Member States should be allowed to apply the rules on authorisations for vine plantings suitable for producing wines with a geographical indication also to wines suitable for producing wine spirits with a geographical indication.
Za zagotovitev zaščite za vinska žganja z geografsko označbo pred tveganjem prilastitve slovesa bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti uporabo pravil o dovoljenjih za zasaditev vinske trte, ki je primerna za pridelavo vin z geografsko označbo, tudi za vina, primerna za proizvodnjo vinskega žganja z geografsko označbo.
The use of contracts in the milk and milk products sector may help to reinforce the responsibility of operators and to increase their awareness of the need to better take into account the signals of the market, to improve price transmission and to adapt supply to demand, as well as to help to avoid certain unfair commercial practices.
Uporaba pogodb v sektorju mleka in mlečnih izdelkov lahko pomaga okrepiti odgovornost izvajalcev in povečati njihovo zavedanje o tem, da je treba bolj upoštevati signale trga, izboljšati prenos cen in ponudbo prilagoditi povpraševanju, prispeva pa lahko tudi k preprečevanju določenih nepoštenih trgovinskih praks.
In order to incentivise the use of such contracts in the milk and milk products sector as well as in other sectors, producers, producer organisations or association of producer organisations should have the right to request a written contract, even if the Member State concerned has not made the use of such contracts compulsory.
Da bi spodbudili uporabo takšnih pogodb v sektorju mleka in mlečnih izdelkov ter v drugih sektorjih, bi morali imeti proizvajalci, organizacije proizvajalcev ali združenja organizacij proizvajalcev pravico zaprositi za pisno pogodbo, tudi če zadevna država članica ni določila obvezne uporabe takšnih pogodb.
While the parties to a contract for the delivery of raw milk are free to negotiate the elements of such contracts, Member States who make the use of contracts compulsory have been granted the opportunity to impose certain contract clauses, in particular their minimum duration.
Stranke pri pogodbi za oddajo surovega mleka se lahko prosto pogajajo o elementih takšnih pogodb, vendar je bila državam članicam, ki predpisujejo uporabo takšnih pogodb, odobrena možnost uvedbe določenih pogodbenih klavzul, zlasti njihovega minimalnega trajanja.
With a view to enabling the parties to achieve contractual clarity on the delivered quantities and prices, Member States should also have the possibility of imposing on the parties the obligation to agree on a relationship between a delivered quantity and the price payable for that delivery.
Da bi strankam omogočili pogodbeno jasnost glede dobavljenih količin in cen, bi morale države članice imeti tudi možnost, da strankam naložijo obveznost, naj se dogovorijo o razmerju med dobavljeno količino in ceno, ki se plača za to dobavo.
Their activities, including the contractual negotiations for the supply of agricultural products by such producer organisations and their associations when concentrating supply and placing the products of their members on the market, therefore contribute to the fulfilment of the objectives of the CAP set out in Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), since they strengthen the position of farmers in the food supply chain and can contribute to a better functioning of the food supply chain.
Njihove dejavnosti, vključno s pogodbenimi pogajanji za dobavo kmetijskih proizvodov s strani takšnih organizacij proizvajalcev in njihovih združenj, kadar koncentrirajo ponudbo in dajejo proizvode svojih članov na trg, tako prispevajo k izpolnitvi ciljev SKP iz člena 39 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), saj krepijo položaj kmetov v verigi preskrbe s hrano in lahko prispevajo k boljšemu delovanju te verige.
The reform of the CAP in 2013 reinforced the role of producer organisations.
Reforma SKP leta 2013 je okrepila vlogo organizacij proizvajalcev.
By way of derogation from Article 101 TFEU, the possibility to carry out activities such as production planning, cost optimisation, placing producer members' products on the market and conducting contractual negotiations should therefore be explicitly regulated as a right of recognised producer organisations in all sectors for which Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10] establishes a common organisation of the markets.
Z odstopanjem od člena 101 PDEU bi bilo možnost izvajanja dejavnosti, kot so načrtovanje proizvodnje, optimizacija stroškov, dajanje izdelkov članov proizvajalcev na trg in izvajanje pogodbenih pogajanj, zato treba izrecno urediti kot pravico priznanih organizacij proizvajalcev v vseh sektorjih, za katere Uredba (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10] vzpostavlja skupno ureditev trgov.
That derogation should only cover producer organisations which genuinely exercise an activity aimed at economic integration and which concentrate supply and place products of their members on the market.
To odstopanje bi moralo vključevati samo organizacije proizvajalcev, ki dejansko izvajajo dejavnost, namenjeno gospodarskemu povezovanju, ter koncentrirajo ponudbo in dajejo proizvode svojih članov na trg.
However, in addition to the application of Article 102 TFEU to such producer organisations, safeguards should be put in place in order to ensure that such activities do not exclude competition or jeopardise the objectives set out in Article 39 TFEU.
Čeprav se za takšne organizacije proizvajalcev uporablja člen 102 PDEU, bi bilo treba vzpostaviti tudi zaščitne ukrepe, da se zagotovi, da takšne dejavnosti ne izključujejo konkurence ali ogrožajo doseganja ciljev iz člena 39 PDEU.
Competition authorities should have the right to intervene in such cases and decide that such activities should, for the future, be modified, discontinued or not take place at all.
Organi, pristojni za konkurenco, bi morali imeti pravico, da posredujejo v takih primerih in odločijo, da je treba takšne dejavnosti v bodoče spremeniti, jih prekiniti ali jih sploh ne izvajati.
Until the adoption of the decision of the competition authority, the activities carried out by producer organisations should be considered legal.
Do sprejetja odločitve organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, bi bilo treba dejavnosti, ki jih izvajajo organizacije proizvajalcev, šteti za zakonite.
Associations of producer organisations recognised under Article 156(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 should be able to rely, for the activities that they carry out themselves, on that derogation to the same extent and under the same conditions as producer organisations.
Združenja organizacij proizvajalcev, priznana v skladu s členom 156(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013, bi morala imeti možnost, da se za dejavnosti, ki jih izvajajo sama, sklicujejo na navedeno odstopanje v enakem obsegu in pod enakimi pogoji kot organizacije proizvajalcev.
Producer organisations are recognised in a specific sector referred to in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Organizacije proizvajalcev so priznane v posameznih sektorjih, navedenih v členu 1(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013.
However, as producer organisations may operate in more than one sector and in the interest of avoiding administrative burden by obliging them to create several producer organisations for recognition purposes, it should be possible for a producer organisation to obtain more than one recognition.
Ker pa lahko organizacije proizvajalcev delujejo v več kot enem sektorju in zato da se jih obveže k ustanovitvi več organizacij proizvajalcev za namene priznanja in s tem zmanjša upravno breme, bi moralo biti mogoče, da ena sama organizacija proizvajalcev pridobi več priznanj.
However, in such cases, the producer organisation in question should fulfil the conditions of recognition for each of the sectors concerned.
Vendar bi morala v takšnih primerih zadevna organizacija proizvajalcev izpolnjevati pogoje za priznanje za vsakega od zadevnih sektorjev.
Taking note of the role which interbranch organisations can play for the better functioning of the food supply chain, the list of possible objectives which such interbranch organisations may pursue should be extended to cover also measures to prevent and manage risks related to animal health, plant-protection and the environment.
Ob upoštevanju vloge, ki jo lahko imajo medpanožne organizacije pri boljšem delovanju verige preskrbe s hrano, bi bilo treba seznam morebitnih ciljev, za katere si lahko takšne medpanožne organizacije prizadevajo, razširiti, da bi zajemal tudi ukrepe za preprečevanje in obvladovanje tveganj, povezanih z zdravjem živali, varstvom rastlin in okoljem.
Interbranch organisations are recognised in a specific sector referred to in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Medpanožne organizacije so priznane v posameznih sektorjih, navedenih v členu 1(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013.
However, as interbranch organisations may operate in more than one sector and, in the interest of avoiding administrative burden by obliging them to create several interbranch organisations for recognition purposes, it should be possible for an interbranch organisation to obtain more than one recognition.
Ker pa lahko medpanožne organizacije delujejo v več kot enem sektorju in zato da se jih obveže k ustanovitvi več medpanožnih organizacij za namene priznanja in s tem zmanjša upravno breme, bi moralo biti mogoče, da ena sama medpanožna organizacija pridobi več priznanj.
However, in such cases, the interbranch organisation should fulfil the conditions of recognition for each of the sectors concerned.
Vendar bi morala v takšnih primerih medpanožna organizacija izpolnjevati pogoje za priznanje za vsakega od zadevnih sektorjev.
In order to facilitate better transmission of market signals and strengthen linkages between producer prices and value added throughout the supply chain, farmers, including associations of farmers, should be allowed to agree with their first purchaser on value-sharing clauses, including market bonuses and losses.
Za lažje posredovanje tržnih signalov ter okrepitev povezav med cenami proizvajalcev in dodano vrednostjo v celotni dobavni verigi bi bilo treba kmetom, vključno z združenji kmetov, dovoliti, da se s svojim prvim kupcem dogovorijo o klavzulah o porazdelitvi vrednosti, vključno s tržnimi bonusi in izgubami.
As interbranch organisations can play an important part in allowing dialogue between actors in the supply chain and in promoting best practices and market transparency, they should be allowed to establish standard value-sharing clauses.
Ker imajo lahko medpanožne organizacije pomembno vlogo pri omogočanju dialoga med udeleženci v dobavni verigi ter spodbujanju najboljših praks in preglednosti trga, bi jim bilo treba dovoliti, da določijo standardne klavzule o porazdelitvi vrednosti.
However, the use of value-sharing clauses by farmers, associations of farmers and their first purchaser should remain voluntary.
Vendar bi morala uporaba klavzul o porazdelitvi vrednosti s strani kmetov, združenj kmetov in njihovega prvega kupca ostati prostovoljna.
The experience gained through the application of Article 188 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 has proven that the need to adopt implementing acts for the management of simple, mathematical processes linked to the way quotas are allocated is cumbersome and resource-intensive without any specific advantage linked to such an approach.
Izkušnje z uporabo člena 188 Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 so pokazale, da je potreba po sprejetju izvedbenih aktov za upravljanje preprostih matematičnih procesov, povezanih z načinom dodeljevanja kvot, okorna in zahteva obsežne vire, ne da bi prinesla kakšne posebne prednosti.
The Commission has, in fact, no margin of discretion in this context considering that the related formula is already fixed by Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 [11].
Komisija dejansko nima diskrecijskega manevrskega prostora na tem področju, saj je s tem povezana formula že določena v členu 7(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1301/2006 [11].
In order to reduce the related administrative burden and streamline the process it should be provided that the Commission makes the results of the allocation of the tariff quotas public through an appropriate web-publication.
Za zmanjšanje s tem povezanega upravnega bremena in poenostavitev procesa bi bilo treba določiti, da Komisija objavi rezultate dodelitve tarifnih kvot na ustrezni spletni strani.
Moreover a specific provision should be included providing that Member States should only issue licences following the publication of the allocation results by the Commission.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba vključiti specifično določbo, po kateri bi morale države članice izdajati dovoljenja le po tem, ko bi Komisija objavila rezultate dodelitve.
In order to ensure the effective use by farmers' or producer organisations or their associations of Article 209 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the possibility to request the opinion of the Commission on the compatibility of agreements, decisions and concerted practices of farmers' or producer organisations or their associations with the objectives set out in Article 39 TFEU should be introduced.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito uporabo člena 209 Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 s strani organizacij kmetov ali proizvajalcev oziroma njihovih združenj, bi bilo treba uvesti možnost, da se pri Komisiji zaprosi za mnenje o združljivosti njihovih sporazumov, odločitev in usklajenih ravnanj s cilji iz člena 39 PDEU.
In order to ensure that the provisions in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 allowing collective agreements and decisions to temporarily stabilise the sectors concerned in times of severe imbalance in markets can be implemented in an effective and timely manner, the possibilities for such collective actions should be extended to farmers and associations of farmers.
Za zagotovitev, da je določbe iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013, ki dovoljujejo kolektivne sporazume in odločitve za začasno stabilizacijo zadevnih sektorjev v obdobjih hudega neravnovesja na trgih, mogoče izvajati učinkovito in pravočasno, bi bilo treba možnosti za takšne skupne ukrepe razširiti na kmete in združenja kmetov.
Furthermore, such temporary measures should no longer be authorised as a means of last resort but could complement Union action in the context of public intervention, private storage and the exceptional measures envisaged by Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Poleg tega taki začasni ukrepi ne bi smeli biti več dovoljeni v skrajnem primeru, temveč bi lahko dopolnjevali ukrepanje Unije v okviru javne intervencije, zasebnega skladiščenja in izrednih ukrepov, predvidenih z Uredbo (EU) št. 1308/2013.
As it is appropriate to continue to help the milk and milk products sector in its transition as a result of the end of the quota system and to encourage it to respond more effectively to market and price fluctuations, the provisions in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 reinforcing the contractual arrangements in the milk and milk products sector should no longer have an end date.
Ker je ustrezno še naprej zagotavljati pomoč sektorju mleka in mlečnih izdelkov pri prehodu po koncu sistema kvot ter spodbujati sektor k učinkovitejšemu odzivu na tržna in cenovna nihanja, določbe iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013, ki krepijo pogodbena razmerja v sektorju mleka in mlečnih izdelkov, ne bi smele več imeti datuma prenehanja veljavnosti.
Agricultural markets should be transparent and information about prices should be accessible and useful to all those involved.
Kmetijski trgi bi morali biti pregledni, informacije o cenah pa dostopne in uporabne za vse udeležene.
The experience gained through the application of Section A of Part II of Annex VIII to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 has proven that the need to adopt implementing acts for the approval of limited increases in wine enrichment limits, which are technical and uncontroversial in nature, is cumbersome and resource-intensive without any specific advantage resulting from such an approach.
Izkušnje z uporabo oddelka A dela II Priloge VIII k Uredbi (EU) št. 1308/2013 so pokazale, da je pristop, v skladu s katerim je treba za odobritev omejenih povečanj mejnih vrednosti obogatitve vina, ki so po svojem značaju tehnična in nesporna, sprejeti izvedbene akte, zapleten in zahteva obsežne vire, ne da bi prinesel kakšne posebne prednosti.
In order to reduce the related administrative burden and streamline the process it should be provided that Member States that decide to make use of that derogation are to notify the Commission of any such decisions.
Za zmanjšanje s tem povezanega upravnega bremena in poenostavitev procesa bi bilo treba določiti, da morajo države članice, ki se odločijo uporabiti to odstopanje, o tem uradno obvestiti Komisijo.
Regulation (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [12] provides for the possibility to divide budgetary commitments into annual instalments only in the case of approval of multiannual programmes for the eradication, control and surveillance of animal diseases and zoonoses, for survey programmes concerning the presence of pests and for programmes concerning the control of pests in outermost regions of the Union.
Uredba (EU) št. 652/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12] določa možnost razdelitve proračunskih obveznosti v letne obroke, vendar le v primeru odobritve večletnih programov za izkoreninjenje, obvladovanje in nadzor bolezni živali in zoonoz, programov preiskav navzočnosti škodljivih organizmov in programov za obvladovanje škodljivih organizmov v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije.
In the interest of simplification and in order to reduce the administrative burden, that possibility should be extended to the other actions provided for in that Regulation.
Z namenom poenostavitve in za zmanjšanje upravnega bremena bi morala biti ta možnost razširjena na druge ukrepe, ki jih ureja navedena uredba.
In order to enable the amendments provided for in this Regulation to be applied from 1 January 2018, it should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Da bi se lahko spremembe, določene s to uredbo, uporabljale od 1. januarja 2018, bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013, (EU) No 1306/2013, (EU) No 1307/2013, (EU) No 1308/2013 and (EU) No 652/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, (EU) št. 1306/2013, (EU) št. 1307/2013, (EU) št. 1308/2013 in (EU) št. 652/2014 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013
Spremembe Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013
Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 is amended as follows:
Uredba (EU) št. 1305/2013 se spremeni:
in Article 2(1), the second subparagraph is amended as follows:
v členu 2 se drugi pododstavek spremeni:
point (n) is replaced by the following:
točka (n) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
“young farmer” means a person who is no more than 40 years of age at the moment of submitting the application, possesses adequate occupational skills and competence and is setting up for the first time in an agricultural holding as head of that holding; the setting up may be done solely or jointly with other farmers, irrespective of its legal form;’;
‚mladi kmet‘ pomeni osebo, ki v času predložitve vloge ni stara več kot 40 let, ima ustrezno poklicno znanje in usposobljenost ter prvič vzpostavlja kmetijsko gospodarstvo kot nosilec tega gospodarstva; oseba lahko gospodarstvo vzpostavi sama ali skupaj z drugimi kmeti, ne glede na pravno obliko;“;
“date of setting up” means the date when the applicant performs or completes (an) action(s) related to the setting up referred to in point (n).’;
‚datum vzpostavitve‘ pomeni datum, na katerega vlagatelj začne ali zaključi dejanje(-a), povezano(-a) z vzpostavitvijo iz točke (n).“;
in Article 8(1), point (h)(ii) is replaced by the following:
v členu 8(1) se točka (h)(ii) nadomesti z naslednjim:
a table setting out, for each measure, for each type of operation with a specific EAFRD contribution rate, for the type of operation referred to in Article 37(1) and Article 39a and for technical assistance, the total Union contribution planned and the applicable EAFRD contribution rate.
preglednico, v kateri sta za vsak ukrep, za vsako vrsto operacije, za katero velja posebna stopnja prispevka EKSRP, za vrsto operacije iz člena 37(1) in člena 39a in za tehnično pomoč določena celoten načrtovani prispevek Unije in veljavna stopnja prispevka EKSRP.
Where applicable, this table shall indicate separately the EAFRD contribution rate for less developed regions and for other regions;’;
Če je ustrezno, se v tej preglednici ločeno prikaže stopnja prispevka EKSRP za manj razvite regije in za druge regije;“;
Infrastructure installed as a result of demonstration may be used after the operation is completed.
Infrastruktura, nameščena zaradi demonstracije, se sme uporabljati po zaključku operacije.
All costs identified under this paragraph shall be paid to the beneficiary.’;
Vsi stroški, opredeljeni v tem odstavku, se plačajo upravičencu.“;
The beneficiary of support provided in accordance with points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1 shall be either the provider of advice or training or the Managing Authority.
Do podpore v skladu s točkama (a) in (c) odstavka 1 je upravičen bodisi subjekt, ki zagotavlja svetovanje ali usposabljanje, bodisi organ upravljanja.
Where the Managing Authority is the beneficiary, the provider of advice or training shall be selected by a body that is functionally independent from the Managing Authority.
Kadar je do te podpore upravičen organ upravljanja, je za izbiro subjekta, ki zagotavlja svetovanje ali usposabljanje, zadolžen organ, ki je funkcionalno neodvisen od organa upravljanja.
Support under point (b) of paragraph 1 shall be granted to the authority or body selected to set up the farm management, farm relief, farm advisory or forestry advisory service.’;
Podpora na podlagi točke (b) odstavka 1 se odobri organu ali subjektu, ki je izbran za vzpostavitev službe za pomoč pri upravljanju kmetij, službe za zagotavljanje nadomeščanja na kmetijah ali službe za kmetijsko ali gozdarsko svetovanje.“;