natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
While in the Melki judgment [5] the Court of Justice recognised that Member States may establish such specific police powers for internal border areas allowing for enhanced identity checks only in those parts of the territory, it ruled that in those situations, Member States must provide specific provisions in relation to the intensity and frequency of such controls.
Čeprav je Sodišče v zadevi Melki [5] priznalo, da države članice za notranja obmejna območja lahko določijo takšna posebna policijska pooblastila, ki omogočajo okrepljeno kontrolo identitete samo na teh delih ozemlja, je odločilo, da morajo države članice v teh primerih določiti posebne določbe glede obsega in pogostosti takšnih kontrol.
In addition, if a check does not depend upon the behaviour of the person checked or on specific circumstances or information giving rise to a risk for public policy or internal security, Member States are to provide for the necessary framework to guide its practical application to avoid that such police measures have an effect equivalent to border controls.
Poleg tega morajo države članice, če kontrola ni odvisna od vedenja preverjane osebe ali posebnih okoliščin ali informacij, ki pomenijo nevarnost kršitve za javni red ali notranjo varnost, zagotoviti potreben okvir za usmerjanje njenega izvajanja, da se prepreči, da imajo takšni policijski ukrepi enakovreden učinek kot ga imajo mejne kontrole.
Over the past three years a number of Member States have intensified police checks in the border areas in the context of the increased threats to public policy or internal security (namely, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Netherlands, France, Italy, Slovenia, and Switzerland).
V zadnjih treh letih so številne države članice okrepile policijske kontrole na obmejnih območjih v okviru povečane grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, in sicer Avstrija, Belgija, Češka, Nemčija, Danska, Nizozemska, Francija, Italija, Slovenija in Švica.
Those checks sometimes focused on specific means of transport, for instance, trains, or specific border areas.
Te kontrole so včasih osredotočene na določene načine prevoza, na primer z vlakom, ali na določena obmejna območja.
The use of technological means is also increasing in this context.
V tem okviru narašča tudi uporaba tehnoloških sredstev.
The Commission has not contested any of those cases.
Komisija ni izpodbijala nobenega od teh ukrepov.
Some of those cases set examples of good practice in addressing persistent, increased threats to public policy or internal security.
Nekateri od teh ukrepov so zgled dobre prakse pri obravnavanju vztrajne in povečane grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti.
Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/399, the temporary reintroduction of border controls may be used only in exceptional circumstances, as a last resort measure.
V skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2016/399 se začasna ponovna uvedba nadzora na mejah lahko uporabi le v izrednih okoliščinah in kot skrajni ukrep.
In this context Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/246 [6] explicitly encouraged the Member States to assess whether police checks would not achieve the same results as temporary internal border controls, before introducing or prolonging such controls.
V tem okviru Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2017/246 [6] izrecno spodbuja države članice, naj pred uvedbo ali podaljšanjem takšnega nadzora ocenijo, ali policijske kontrole ne bi dosegle enakih rezultatov kot začasen nadzor na notranjih mejah.
While in some circumstances it may be clear from the outset that police checks alone are not sufficient to address the identified threats to public policy or internal security (for example, searching for specific suspects following a terrorist attack), in other cases, similar objectives as those of reintroduced border controls may be pursued by means of enhanced police checks in border areas.
Medtem ko je v nekaterih okoliščinah lahko že od začetka jasno, da samo policijske kontrole ne bodo zadoščale za obravnavo ugotovljenih groženj javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti (na primer pri iskanju posameznih osumljencev po terorističnem napadu), pa bodo v drugih primerih cilji, podobni ciljem ponovne uvedbe nadzora na mejah, lahko doseženi z okrepljenimi policijskimi kontrolami na obmejnih območjih.
Therefore, on the one hand, the decision on the temporary reintroduction of border controls at internal borders should be in principle preceded by the assessment of other alternative measures.
Zato bi bilo treba po eni strani pred sprejetjem odločitve o začasni ponovni uvedbi nadzora na notranjih mejah načeloma opraviti presojo drugih alternativnih ukrepov.
In particular in case of decisions on the temporary reintroduction of border controls at internal borders due to foreseeable events Member States should demonstrate that such assessment has been carried out.
Zlasti v primeru odločitve o začasni ponovni uvedbi nadzora na notranjih mejah zaradi predvidljivih dogodkov bi morale države članice dokazati, da je bila taka presoja opravljena.
On the other hand in specific cases of urgent and serious threats to public policy or internal security at the level of the area without internal border control or at national level, the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls may be necessary immediately.
Po drugi strani je v nekaterih primerih nujnih in resnih groženj javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti na ravni območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah ali na nacionalni ravni, morda začasna ponovna uvedba nadzora na notranjih mejah potrebna takoj.
This Recommendation encourages Member States to better use their police powers and to give precedence to police checks before deciding on the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls.
To priporočilo države članice spodbuja, naj bolje uporabijo svoja policijska pooblastila in pred odločitvijo o začasni ponovni uvedbi nadzora na notranjih mejah dajo prednost policijskim kontrolam.
Whichever measures a Member State takes to address a specific threat to its public policy or internal security, it should ensure that the implementation of the measure does not lead to obstacles to the free movement of persons and goods which would not be necessary, justified by and proportionate to those threats to public policy or internal security and that it fully respects fundamental rights and in particular the principle of non-discrimination.
Ne glede na vrsto ukrepa, ki ga država članica sprejme za obravnavanje posebnih groženj njenemu javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, bi morala zagotoviti, da izvajanje ukrepa ne povzroča ovir za prosto gibanje oseb in pretok blaga, ki niso potrebne, utemeljene in sorazmerne s temi grožnjami javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, ter da v celoti spoštuje temeljne pravice in zlasti načelo nediskriminacije.
The area without internal border control also relies on the effective and efficient application by the Member States of accompanying measures in the area of cross-border police cooperation.
Območje brez nadzora na notranjih mejah je odvisno tudi od uspešnega in učinkovitega izvajanja spremljevalnih ukrepov na področju čezmejnega policijskega sodelovanja v državah članicah.
The Schengen evaluations conducted so far in the field of police cooperation have highlighted that even though Member States are generally legally compliant with the Schengen acquis, a number of obstacles hamper the practical use of some of the cross-border police cooperation tools available to Member States.
Dosedanja schengenska ocenjevanja na področju policijskega sodelovanja so izpostavila, da čeprav so države članice na splošno pravno skladne s schengenskim pravnim redom, številne ovire ovirajo praktično uporabo nekaterih instrumentov za čezmejno policijsko sodelovanje, ki so na voljo državam članicam.
Member States should therefore be encouraged to tackle these obstacles to better address cross-border threats.
Države članice bi bilo treba torej spodbujati, naj odpravijo ovire za boljše obravnavanje čezmejnih groženj.
Joint police patrols and other existing tools of operational police cooperation contribute to internal security in the area without internal border controls.
Skupne policijske patrulje in drugi obstoječi instrumenti za operativno policijsko sodelovanje prispevajo k notranji varnosti na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah.
Joint patrols on board of cross-border trains e.g. clearly enhance security, by preventing situations where the lack of symmetry in controls undermines the efforts taken on one side of the border only.
Skupne patrulje na mednarodnih vlakih na primer nedvomno krepijo varnost, in sicer s preprečevanjem situacij, v katerih neravnovesje pri nadzoru oslabi prizadevanja, ki se izvajajo le na eni strani meje.
A number of Member States have established practices which facilitate or allow for joint police operations to take place (for instance, the joint police stations which Germany and Poland have established at their border focussing on joint patrolling and other operations, or the micro-teams established for joint investigations at the Austrian-Czech border, joint train patrols in Austria, Germany, France, Italy, and Hungary, or the recruitment by German police of nationals from other Member States, in particular for patrolling in the border regions).
Številne države članice so vzpostavile prakse, ki spodbujajo ali dovoljujejo izvajanje skupnih policijskih operacij (na primer skupne policijske postaje, ki sta jih Nemčija in Poljska vzpostavili na svoji meji in se osredotočajo na skupno patruljiranje ter druge operacije, male ekipe za skupne preiskave na avstrijsko-češki meji, skupne patrulje na vlakih v Avstriji, Nemčiji, Franciji, Italiji in na Madžarskem ali zaposlovanje državljanov drugih držav članic v nemški policiji, zlasti za patruljiranje v obmejnih regijah).
Other Member States should be encouraged to follow these best practices.
Druge države članice bi bilo treba spodbujati k uporabi teh najboljših praks.
Joint threat analysis and cross-border information exchange between Member States sharing border regions can help in designing efficient police checks to address the identified threats.
Skupna analiza groženj in čezmejna izmenjava informacij med državami članicami, ki si delijo obmejne regije, lahko pomagata pri oblikovanju učinkovitih policijskih kontrol za obravnavanje ugotovljenih groženj.
Such cooperation can cover the risks on specific cross-border traffic routes, as well as specific means of transportation often used in criminal activities, in order to allow for targeted police checks ahead of border areas.
Takšno sodelovanje lahko zajema tveganja glede določenih čezmejnih prometnih poti in tudi glede določenih prevoznih sredstev, ki se pogosto uporabljajo pri kriminalnih dejavnostih, da bi se omogočile usmerjene policijske kontrole pred nadzorom na mejah.
Such police checks can provide a joint tool to address the threats to public policy or internal security faced by the Member States concerned.
Take policijske kontrole lahko zagotovijo skupni instrument za obravnavanje groženj javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, s katerimi se soočajo zadevne države članice.
For this reason it is important to encourage Member States to further develop cross-border cooperation.
Zato je pomembno, da se države članice spodbuja, naj dodatno razvijejo čezmejno sodelovanje.
To reinforce cross-border police cooperation, Member States may request the support from the Commission in the implementation of this Recommendation.
Za krepitev čezmejnega policijskega sodelovanja lahko države članice zaprosijo za podporo Komisije pri izvajanju tega priporočila.
Such support can contribute for instance to facilitate the exchange of best practices among practitioners and decision makers of the Member States and enhance the cooperation between Member States and the relevant agencies (Europol and the European Border and Coast Guard).
Taka podpora lahko prispeva na primer k lažji izmenjavi najboljših praks med izvajalci in nosilci odločanja v državah članicah ter okrepitvi sodelovanja med državami članicami in zadevnimi agencijami (Europol in Evropska agencija za mejno in obalno stražo).
It can contribute also to further enhance cross-border cooperation structures such as the Police Customs Cooperation Centres.
Prispeva lahko tudi k nadaljnji krepitvi struktur čezmejnega sodelovanja, kot so centri za policijsko in carinsko sodelovanje.
In addition, the Commission will support the updating, based on input from Member States, the 2011 ‘Schengen catalogue’ [7], which identifies, among others, best practices in the field of operational cross-border police cooperation, and the National Fact Sheets of the ‘Manual on cross-border operations’ [8].
Poleg tega bo Komisija podpirala posodobitev „schengenskega kataloga“ [7] iz leta 2011, ki med drugim opredeljuje najboljšo prakso na področju operativnega čezmejnega policijskega sodelovanja, in nacionalnih podatkovnih listov „Priročnika o čezmejnih operacijah“ [8], in sicer na podlagi informacij, prejetih od držav članic.
As demonstrated by the recent migratory crisis, uncontrolled secondary movements of irregular migrants may pose a serious threat to public policy or internal security.
Kot je pokazala nedavna migracijska kriza, lahko nenadzorovano sekundarno gibanje migrantov brez urejenega statusa pomeni resno grožnjo javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti.
The proper application of the bilateral readmission agreements in accordance with Article 6(3) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [9], can be instrumental in addressing secondary movements of illegally staying third-country nationals.
Ustrezno izvajanje dvostranskih sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu v skladu s členom 6(3) Direktive 2008/115/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9] je lahko bistvenega pomena pri odpravljanju sekundarnih gibanj nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav.
The bilateral agreements may also help in achieving similar results as targeted border controls at internal borders in terms of addressing the threats to public policy or internal security, while limiting the impact on the movement of bona fide travellers.
Dvostranski sporazumi lahko pri obravnavanju groženj javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti ravno tako pomagajo doseči podobne rezultate kot ciljno usmerjene mejne kontrole na notranjih mejah, obenem pa omejujejo vpliv na gibanje dobronamernih potnikov.
It is therefore important that Member States apply the bilateral readmission agreements efficiently while respecting the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/432 [10].
Zato je pomembno, da države članice učinkovito uporabljajo dvostranske sporazume o ponovnem sprejemu ob upoštevanju Priporočila Komisije (EU) 2017/432 [10].
The Commission considers that this Recommendation needs a reasonable time to be implemented; therefore the Commission recommends that it should be implemented as soon as possible and at the latest within 6 months.
Evropska komisija meni, da je to priporočilo treba začeti izvajati v razumnem času, zato priporoča, da se začne uporabljati takoj, ko je mogoče, in najpozneje v 6 mesecih.
This Recommendation should be implemented in full respect of fundamental rights.
To priporočilo bi bilo treba izvajati ob doslednem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic.
This Recommendation should be addressed to all Schengen States bound by Title III of Regulation (EU) 2016/399,
To priporočilo bi bilo treba nasloviti na vse schengenske države, ki jih zavezuje naslov III Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 –
More effective use of police checks
Učinkovitejša uporaba policijskih kontrol
To adequately remedy the threats to public policy or internal security within the Schengen area, Member States should, where needed and justified in accordance with national law:
Da bi ustrezno odpravile grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti na schengenskem območju, bi države članice, če je to potrebno in upravičeno na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje, morale:
intensify police checks across the entire territory, including in border areas;
poostriti policijske kontrole na celotnem ozemlju, tudi na obmejnih območjih;
carry out police checks on main transport routes, including in border areas;
izvajati policijske kontrole na glavnih prometnih poteh, tudi na obmejnih območjih;
adapt the police checks in border areas on the basis of continuous risk assessment, while ensuring that those police checks do not have border control as an objective;
prilagoditi policijske kontrole na obmejnih območjih na podlagi stalne ocene tveganja, hkrati pa zagotoviti, da se navedene policijske kontrole ne izvajajo z namenom nadzorovanja meje;
make use of modern technologies in order to monitor vehicles and traffic flows.
uporabiti sodobne tehnologije za spremljanje vozil in prometnih tokov.
Giving precedence to police checks in case of a serious threat to internal security or public policy
Dajanje prednosti policijskim kontrolam v primeru resne grožnje notranji varnosti ali javnemu redu
Where in a situation of a serious threat to public policy or internal security, Member States consider applying chapter II of Title III of the Regulation (EU) 2016/399, they should first assess whether the situation can be adequately addressed by way of stepping up police checks within the territory, including in border areas.
Kadar imajo v primeru resne grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti države članice namen uporabiti poglavje II naslova III Uredbe (EU) 2016/399, bi morale najprej oceniti, ali bi lahko takšne grožnje ustrezno obravnavale z okrepitvijo policijskih kontrol na ozemlju, vključno z obmejnimi območji.
Strenghtening cross-border police cooperation
Krepitev čezmejnega policijskega sodelovanja
To strengthen cross-border police cooperation in addressing threats to public policy or internal security, Member States should:
Za krepitev čezmejnega policijskega sodelovanja pri obravnavanju groženj javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti bi morale države članice:
re-assess the extent to which they currently use all available cross-border police operational cooperation tools such as joint patrols, joint operations, joint investigation teams, cross-border hot pursuits, or cross-border surveillances, Police and Customs Cooperation centers;
ponovno oceniti, v kakšnem obsegu so trenutno v uporabi vsi razpoložljivi instrumenti čezmejnega operativnega sodelovanja, kot so skupne patrulje, skupne operacije, skupne preiskovalne ekipe, čezmejna zasledovanja, čezmejni nadzor, centri za policijsko in carinsko sodelovanje;
work jointly with their neighbouring Member States to remove legal or operational barriers to the full use of all cross-border operational police cooperation tools;
sodelovati s sosednjimi državami članicami, da bi odpravile pravne ali operativne ovire za polno uporabo vseh čezmejnih operativnih policijskih instrumentov za sodelovanje;
develop and implement, as appropriate, joint threat analysis and cross-border information exchanges with their neighbouring Member States to support joint actions to address threats to public policy or internal security in shared internal border areas, including through coordinated police checks in their internal border areas;
po potrebi oblikovati in izvesti skupno analizo groženj in čezmejno izmenjavo informacij s sosednjimi državami članicami, da bi podprle skupne ukrepe za obravnavanje groženj javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti na skupnih notranjih obmejnih območjih, vključno z usklajenimi policijskimi kontrolami na svojih notranjih obmejnih območjih;
assess the need for technical investments to enhance joint operations, notably for surveillance and detection.
oceniti potrebo po tehničnih naložbah za okrepitev skupnih operacij, zlasti za nadzor in odkrivanje.
Effective use of bilateral readmission agreements or arrangements between Member States
Učinkovita uporaba dvostranskih sporazumov ali ureditev o ponovnem sprejemu med državami članicami
To ensure that police checks and police cooperation can lead to the effective countering of unauthorised secondary movements where those movements pose a specific threat to public policy or internal security, Member States should:
Za zagotovitev, da policijske kontrole in policijsko sodelovanje lahko prispevajo k učinkovitemu boju proti nedovoljenim sekundarnim gibanjem, kadar ta gibanja pomenijo posebno grožnjo javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, bi morale države članice:
in accordance with Article 6(3) of Directive 2008/115/EC, take back third-country nationals who transited their territory before being apprehended in another Member State, under the provisions of bilateral agreements or arrangements existing on the date of entry into force of that Directive (13 January 2009), in particular among neighbouring Member States;
v skladu s členom 6(3) Direktive 2008/115/ES ponovno sprejeti državljane tretjih držav, ki so prečkali njihovo ozemlje, preden so bili prijeti v drugi državi članici, na podlagi določb dvostranskih sporazumov ali ureditev, ki veljajo na dan začetka veljavnosti navedene direktive (13. januarja 2009), zlasti med sosednjimi državami;
take all necessary measures, including establishing operational practices between competent authorities and facilitating the exchange of information among them, to ensure that procedures under such bilateral agreements or arrangements are finalised swiftly by the Member States concerned, to ensure that the transfer is carried out as soon as possible;
sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, vključno z vzpostavitvijo operativnih praks med pristojnimi organi in olajšanjem izmenjave informacij med njimi, da se zagotovi, da zadevne države članice čim prej zaključijo postopke iz teh dvostranskih sporazumov ali ureditev, s čimer se zagotovi, da se predaja izvede čim prej;
ensure that, where a Member State decides not to apply the provisions of a bilateral readmission agreement or arrangement or where the third-country nationals concerned are taken back by another Member State, return procedures are launched in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC and in line with Recommendation (EU) 2017/432.
zagotoviti, da kadar se država članica odloči, da ne bo uporabila določb dvostranskega sporazuma ali ureditve o ponovnem sprejemu, ali če zadevne državljane tretje države ponovno sprejme druga država članica, se postopki vračanja začnejo v skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES in v skladu s Priporočilom (EU) 2017/432.
COM(2012)230, Report covering period 1 November 2011 — 30 April 2012.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0230:FIN:EN:PDF
COM(2012) 230, poročilo, ki zajema obdobje od 1. novembra 2011 do 30. aprila 2012.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0230:FIN:sl:PDF
Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p.
Uredba (EU) 2016/399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2016 o Zakoniku Unije o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) (UL L 77, 23.3.2016, str. 1).
1).
Sodba Sodišča z dne 19. julija 2012, Adil, C-278/12 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2012:508.
Judgement of the Court of Justice of 19 July 2012, Adil, ECLI:EU:C:2012:508, C-278/12 PPU.
Sodba Adil, ECLI:EU:C:2012:508, točka 65.
Judgement Adil, ECLI:EU:C:2012:508, point 65.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 22. junija 2010 v združenih zadevah Melki in Abdeli, C-188/10 in C-189/10, ECLI:EU:C:2010:363, točki 73 in 74.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 June 2010, Melki and Abdeli, joined cases C-188/10 and C-189/10, ECLI:EU:C:2010:363, points 73 and 74.
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2017/246 z dne 7. februarja 2017 o priporočilu za podaljšanje začasnega nadzora na notranjih mejah v izrednih okoliščinah, ki ogrožajo splošno delovanje schengenskega območja (UL L 36, 11.2.2017, str.
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/246 of 7 February 2017 setting out a Recommendation for prolonging temporary internal border control in exceptional circumstances putting the overall functioning of the Schengen area at risk (OJ L 36, 11.2.2017, p.
59).
59).
Dokument Sveta 15785/3/10 Rev 3.
Council Document 15785/3/10 Rev 3.
Dokument Sveta 10505/4/09 Rev 4.