natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Angola [according to CCAMLR] (last known flags according to CCAMLR: Curacao, Netherlands Antilles, South Africa, Belize, Morocco)
ORIENTE št. 7
Belize
neznana [glede na CCAMLR, GFCM], (zadnje znane države zastave glede na CCAMLR, GFCM: Mongolija, Togo, Urugvaj)
Unknown (latest known flag: Belize)
SAMUDERA PASIFIK št. 18 (prejšnja imena glede na ICCAT: KAWIL št. 03, LADY VI-T-III)
ORIENTE No. 7
Indonezija
PERLON (previous names according to CCAMLR: CHERNE, BIGARO, HOKING, SARGO, LUGALPESCA; previous names according to GFCM: CHERNE, SARGO, HOKING, BIGARO, UGALPESCA)
SAMUDRA PERKASA 12 [glede na IOTC], SAMUDERA PERKASA 12 [glede na ICCAT]
Unknown [according to CCAMLR, GFCM] (latest known flags according to CCAMLR, GFCM: Mongolia, Togo, Uruguay)
SEA BREEZE [glede na CCAMLR], ANDREY DOLGOV [glede na SEAFO] (prejšnja imena glede na CCAMLR: ANDREY DOLGOV, STD št. 2, SUN TAI št. 2, SHINSEI MARU št. 2)
SAMUDERA PASIFIK No. 18 (previous names according to ICCAT: KAWIL No. 03, LADY VI-T-III)
Togo [glede na CCAMLR], neznana [glede na SEAFO] (zadnje znane države zastave glede na CCAMLR: Kambodža, Južna Koreja, Filipini, Japonska, Namibija)
Indonesia
SHARON 1 (prejšnji imeni glede na GFCM: MANARA I, POSEIDON; prejšnji imeni glede na ICCAT: MANARA 1, POSEIDON)
SAMUDRA PERKASA 12 [according to IOTC], SAMUDERA PERKASA 12 [according to ICCAT]
neznana (zadnja znana država zastave glede na GFCM: Libija; zadnji znani državi zastave glede na ICCAT: Libija, Združeno kraljestvo)
SEA BREEZE [according to CCAMLR], ANDREY DOLGOV [according to SEAFO] (previous names according to CCAMLR: ANDREY DOLGOV, STD No. 2, SUN TAI No. 2, SHINSEI MARU No. 2)
SHUN LAI (prejšnje ime: HSIN JYI WANG št. 6)
Togo [according to CCAMLR], Unknown [according to SEAFO] (lastest known flags according to CCAMLR: Cambodia, South Korea, Philippines, Japan, Namibia)
SOUTHERN STAR 136 (prejšnje ime: HSIANG CHANG)
SHARON 1 (previous names according to GFCM: MANARA I, POSEIDON; previous names according to ICCAT: MANARA 1, POSEIDON)
neznana (zadnja znana država zastave: Saint Vincent in Grenadine)
Unknown (latest known flag according to GFCM: Libya; latest known flags according to ICCAT: Libya, United Kingdom)
TAVRIDA (prejšnji imeni: AURORA, PACIFIC CONQUEROR)
SHUN LAI (previous name: HSIN JYI WANG No. 6)
Rusija (zadnja znana država zastave: Peru)
SOUTHERN STAR 136 (previous name: HSIANG CHANG)
TCHAW (prejšnja imena glede na CCAMLR: REX, CONDOR, INCA, VIKING, CISNE AZUL)
Unknown (latest known flag: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines)
neznana [glede na CCAMLR, GFCM], (zadnje znane države zastave glede na CCAMLR, GFCM: Togo, Belize, Sejšeli)
TAVRIDA (previous names: AURORA, PACIFIC CONQUEROR)
TCHING YE št. 6 (prejšnje ime glede na ICCAT: EL DIRIA I)
Russia (latest known flag: Peru)
neznana (zadnja znana država zastave glede na IATTC, GFCM: Belize; zadnji znani državi zastave glede na ICCAT: Belize, Kostarika)
TCHAW (previous names according to CCAMLR: REX, CONDOR, INCA, VIKING, CISNE AZUL)
TIAN LUNG št. 12
Unknown [according to CCAMLR, GFCM] (latest known flags according to CCAMLR, GFCM: Togo, Belize, Seychelles)
TRINITY (prejšnja imena glede na NAFO, SEAFO: ENXEMBRE, YUCUTAN BASIN, FONTE NOVA, JAWHARA; prejšnja imena glede na NEAFC: ENXEMBRE, YUCUTAN BASIN, FONTENOVA, JAWHARA)
TCHING YE No. 6 (previous name according to ICCAT: EL DIRIA I)
neznana [glede na NAFO, NEAFC, SEAFO], Gana [glede na GFCM] (zadnji znani državi zastave glede na NAFO: Gana, Panama; zadnje znane države zastave glede na NEAFC: Gana, Panama, Maroko)
Unknown (latest known flag according to IATTC, GFCM: Belize; latest known flags according to ICCAT: Belize, Costa Rica)
WEN TENG št. 688/MAHKOIA ABADI št. 196
TIAN LUNG No.12
Fidži
TRINITY (previous names according to NAFO, SEAFO: ENXEMBRE, YUCUTAN BASIN, FONTE NOVA, JAWHARA; previous names according to NEAFC: ENXEMBRE, YUCUTAN BASIN, FONTENOVA, JAWHARA)
YELE [glede na CCAMLR], RAY [glede na GFCM, NEAFC, SEAFO] (prejšnja imena glede na CCAMLR: RAY, KILY, CONSTANT, TROPIC, ISLA GRACIOSA; prejšnja imena glede na GFCM: KILLY, TROPIC, CONSTANT, ISLA RACIOSA; prejšnja imena glede na NEAFC: KILLY, CONSTANT, TROPIC, ISLA GRACIOSA; prejšnja imena glede na SEAFO: KILLY, CONSTANT, TROPIC, ISLA GRACIOSA)
Unknown [according to NAFO, NEAFC, SEAFO], Ghana [according to GFCM] (latest known flags according to NAFO: Ghana, Panama; latest known flags according to NEAFC: Ghana, Panama, Morocco)
Sierra Leone [glede na CCAMLR], Belize [glede na NEAFC, SEAFO] (zadnje znane države zastave glede na CCAMLR: Belize, Ekvatorialna Gvineja, Južna Afrika; zadnje znane države zastave glede na NEAFC: Južna Afrika, Ekvatorialna Gvineja, Mongolija)
WEN TENG No. 688/MAHKOIA ABADI No. 196
Kitajski Tajpej
Fiji
neznana (zadnja znana država zastave: Gruzija)
YELE [according to CCAMLR], RAY [according to GFCM, NEAFC, SEAFO] (previous names according to CCAMLR: RAY, KILY, CONSTANT, TROPIC, ISLA GRACIOSA; previous names according to GFCM: KILLY, TROPIC, CONSTANT, ISLA RACIOSA; previous names according to NEAFC: KILLY, CONSTANT, TROPIC, ISLA GRACIOSA; previous names according to SEAFO: KILLY, CONSTANT, TROPICS, ISLA GRACIOSA)
YUTUNA 3 (prejšnje ime: HUNG SHENG št. 166)
Sierra Leone [according to CCAMLR], Belize [according to NEAFC, SEAFO] (latest known flags according to CCAMLR: Belize, Equatorial Guinea, South Africa; latest known flags according to NEAFC: South Africa, Equatorial Guinea, Mongolia)
YUTUNA št. 1
Chinese Taipei
ZEMOUR 1 [glede na CCAMLR, SEAFO], HUIQUAN/WUTAISHAN ANHUI 44 [glede na GFCM], SONGHUA [glede na CCAT, IOTC] (prejšnja imena glede na CCAMLR: KADEI, SONGHUA, YUNNAN, NIHEWAN, HUIQUAN, WUTAISHAN ANHUI 44, YANGZI HUA 44, TROSKY, PALOMA V; prejšnje ime glede na ICCAT, IOTC: YUNNAN; prejšnje ime glede na SEAFO: SONGHUA)
Unknown (latest known flag: Georgia)
Mavretanija [glede na CCAMLR, SEAFO], Tanzanija [glede na GFCM], neznana [glede na ICCAT, IOTC], Ekvatorialna Gvineja [glede na ICCAT] (zadnje znane države zastave glede na CCAMLR: Ekvatorialna Gvineja, Indonezija, Tanzanija, Mongolija, Kambodža, Namibija, Urugvaj; zadnja znana država zastave glede na ICCAT, IOTC: Ekvatorialna Gvineja)
YUTUNA 3 (previous names: HUNG SHENG No. 166)
ZEMOUR 2 [glede na CCAMLR, SEAFO], SHAANXI HENAN 33 [glede na GFCM], YONGDING [glede na ICCAT, IOTC] (prejšnja imena glede na CCAMLR: LUAMPA, YONGDING, CHENGDU, JIANGFENG, SHAANXI HENAN 33, XIONG NU BARU 33, DRACO I, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, SEO YANG št. 88, CARRAN; prejšnja imena glede na GFCM: XIONG NU BARU 33, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, CARRAN, DRACO-1; prejšnje ime glede na ICCAT, IOTC: JIANGFENG; prejšnje ime glede na SEAFO: YONDING)
YUTUNA No. 1
Mavretanija [glede na CCAMLR, SEAFO], Tanzanija [glede na GFCM], neznana [glede na ICCAT], Ekvatorialna Gvineja [glede na ICCAT, IOTC] (zadnje znane države zastave glede na CCAMLR: Ekvatorialna Gvineja, Indonezija, Tanzanija, Panama, Sierra Leone, Severna Koreja (DLRK), Togo, Republika Koreja, Urugvaj)
ZEMOUR 1 [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], HUIQUAN/WUTAISHAN ANHUI 44 [according to GFCM], SONGHUA [according to ICCAT, IOTC] (previous names according to CCAMLR: KADEI, SONGHUA, YUNNAN, NIHEWAN, HUIQUAN, WUTAISHAN ANHUI 44, YANGZI HUA 44, TROSKY, PALOMA V; previous name according to ICCAT, IOTC: YUNNAN; previous name according to SEAFO: SONGHUA)
Mednarodna pomorska organizacija.
Mauritania [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], Tanzania [according to GFCM], Unknown [according to ICCAT, IOTC], Equatorial Guinea [according to ICCAT] (latest known flags according to CCAMLR: Equatorial Guinea, Indonesia, Tanzania, Mongolia, Cambodia, Namibia, Uruguay; latest known flag according to ICCAT, IOTC: Equatorial Guinea)
Dodatne informacije so na voljo na spletnih straneh regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva.
ZEMOUR 2 [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], SHAANXI HENAN 33 [according to GFCM], YONGDING [according to ICCAT, IOTC] (previous names according to CCAMLR: LUAMPA, YONGDING, CHENGDU, JIANGFENG, SHAANXI HENAN 33, XIONG NU BARU 33, DRACO I, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, SEO YANG No. 88, CARRAN; previous names according to GFCM: XIONG NU BARU 33, LIBERTY, CHILBO SAN 33, HAMMER, CARRAN, DRACO-1; previous name according to ICCAT, IOTC: JIANGFENG; previous name according to SEAFO: YONDING)
Plovilo „Viking“ [10], ki je trenutno vključeno na seznam Unije, je bilo umaknjeno s seznama Komisije za ohranjanje živih morskih virov na Antarktiki (CCAMLR), ker so ga 14. marca 2016 potopile indonezijske oblasti.
Mauritania [according to CCAMLR, SEAFO], Tanzania [according to GFCM], Unknown [according to ICCAT], Equatorial Guinea [according to ICCAT, IOTC] (latest known flags according to CCAMLR: Equatorial Guinea, Indonesia, Tanzania, Panama, Sierra Leone, North Korea (DPRK), Togo, Republic of Korea, Uruguay)
Navedeno plovilo bi bilo zato treba umakniti s seznama Unije, čeprav še ni bilo črtano s seznama Generalne komisije za ribištvo v Sredozemlju (GFCM).
International Maritime Organization.
2015001 [ICCAT]
For any additional information consult the websites of the regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs).
2015002 [ICCAT]
The vessel ‘Viking’ [10], which is currently included in the Union list, has been removed from the list established by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (‘CCAMLR’), since it had been sunk by the Indonesian authorities on 14 March 2016.
M-00545 (WCPFC]/14613 [IATTC]//C-00545, 20110003 [ICCAT]
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2179
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/2179
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz keramičnih ploščic s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1], and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2016 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije [1], in zlasti člena 11(2) Uredbe,
Following an anti-dumping investigation (‘the original investigation’), the Council imposed, by means of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 [2], a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or ‘China’ or ‘country concerned’).
Po protidampinški preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) je Svet z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 917/2011 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz keramičnih ploščic s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „Kitajska“ ali „zadevna država“).
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty and the duty levels imposed ranged from 13,9 % [3] to 36,5 % for cooperating producers.
Ukrepi so bili v obliki dajatve ad valorem, uvedene stopnje dajatve pa so za sodelujoče proizvajalce znašale od 13,9 % [3] do 36,5 %.
Furthermore, a country-wide duty rate of 69,7 % was imposed on Chinese companies which either did not make themselves known or did not cooperate with the investigation.
Za kitajske družbe, ki se niso javile ali niso sodelovale v preiskavi, je bila uvedena dajatev na ravni države v višini 69,7 %.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [4] of the anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an expiry review of the measures in force pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 (‘the basic Regulation’) (‘the request’).
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [4] veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov je Komisija prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka veljavnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 („osnovna uredba“) („zahtevek“).
The request was lodged by the European Ceramic Tile Manufacturers' Federation (‘the applicant’ or ‘CET’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of ceramic tiles.
Zahtevek je vložila Evropska zveza proizvajalcev keramičnih ploščic („vložnik“ ali „CET“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje keramičnih ploščic Unije.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and continuation or recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi iztek veljavnosti ukrepov verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga in nadaljevanje ali ponovitev škode industriji Unije.
Having determined that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 13 September 2016, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5] (‘Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po ugotovitvi, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov, dne 13. septembra 2016 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2015 do 30. junija 2016 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to the end of the review investigation period (the ‘period considered’).
Preiskava trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2013 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The Commission advised the applicants, other known Union producers, exporting producers in the PRC, known importers, users and traders known to be concerned, associations representing Union producers and users and representatives of the exporting countries of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov obvestila vložnike, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, znane uvoznike, uporabnike in trgovce, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, združenja, ki predstavljajo proizvajalce Unije, ter uporabnike in predstavnike držav izvoznic.
Interested parties were given opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
The Union producers, represented by the applicant, took this opportunity to request that their names are kept confidential for fear that they could face retaliation by customers or competitors implicated by this investigation, in line with Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation.
Proizvajalci Unije, ki jih je zastopal vložnik, so ob tej priložnosti na podlagi člena 19(1) osnovne uredbe zahtevali, da njihova imena ostanejo zaupna, saj so se bali maščevanja strank ali konkurentov, ki jih zadeva ta preiskava.
The Commission individually examined each of these confidentiality requests for merit thereof.
Komisija je proučila vsak zahtevek za zaupnost posebej, da bi ugotovila, ali je upravičen.
It established that there was indeed evidence of a significant possibility of retaliation in each case and accepted that the names of these companies should not be disclosed.
Ugotovila je, da v vseh primerih dejansko obstaja velika verjetnost maščevanja, zato se je strinjala s tem, da imen teh družb ne bi smeli razkriti.
The Chinese Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (the ‘CCCMC’) requested a hearing.
Kitajska gospodarska zbornica uvoznikov in izvoznikov kovin, rudnin in kemikalij („CCCMC“) je zahtevala zaslišanje.
The hearing took place on 6 December 2016.
Zaslišanje je potekalo 6. decembra 2016.
At the hearing and in the subsequent submissions the CCCMC requested full access to the dumping margin, price effects, injury margin and injury indicators calculations, and any other confidential information on which calculations were based.
Na zaslišanju in v kasnejših zahtevkih je CCCMC zahtevala popoln dostop do izračunov stopnje dampinga, cenovnih učinkov, stopnje škode in kazalcev škode ter do vseh ostalih zaupnih informacij, na katerih temeljijo izračuni.
The CCCMC argued that the lawyers that would be granted the access are registered at a European bar association and are subject to strict bar rules and disclosing confidential information to their clients would result in severe disciplinary actions, including disbarment and potential criminal action.
CCCMC je trdila, da so odvetniki, ki bi imeli odobren dostop, registrirani pri Evropski odvetniški zbornici, zaradi česar zanje veljajo stroga pravila zbornice in bi bili ob razkritju zaupnih informacij svojim strankam deležni hudih disciplinskih ukrepov, vključno z odvzemom licence in morebitnim kazenskim pregonom.
Therefore, the CCCMC argued that the access to the confidential file would not breach the Commission's obligation to protect confidential information whilst allowing an effective exercise of the rights of defence.
CCCMC je zato menila, da dostop do zaupnih spisov ne bi bil v nasprotju z obveznostjo Komisije, da varuje zaupne informacije in hkrati omogoča učinkovito uveljavljanje pravice do obrambe.
Article 19 of the basic Regulation stipulates that the Commission must not reveal any information which is by nature confidential without specific permission from the supplier of such information.
Člen 19 osnovne uredbe določa, da Komisija ne sme razkriti nobenih informacij, ki so po svoji naravi zaupne, razen če dobavitelj teh informacij tega izrecno ne dovoli.
It does not envisage that any other party, including lawyers registered at a European bar association, is granted the access.
Odobritve dostopa kateri koli drugi osebi, vključno z odvetniki, registriranimi pri Evropski odvetniški zbornici, ne predvideva.
Furthermore, the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice reveals that the protection of rights of the defence must be, where necessary, reconciled with the principle of confidentiality, which is specifically laid down in Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je iz sodne prakse Sodišča razvidno, da mora biti varstvo pravice do obrambe, kjer je to potrebno, usklajeno z načelom zaupnosti, kar je posebej določeno v členu 19 osnovne uredbe [6].
While that reconciliation permits the receipt of non-confidential summaries of such information (carried out, for instance, in the form of ranges and/or indexed elements of information) where that information would not lead to a disclosure of business secrets, it is not absolute.
Ta uskladitev dopušča prejem nezaupnih povzetkov takih informacij (ki so, na primer, v obliki nizov in/ali indeksiranih elementov informacij), kadar te informacije ne bi povzročile razkritja poslovnih skrivnosti, vendar ni brezpogojna.
Accordingly, and while the CCCMC could have been granted access to, for instance, ranges and/or indexed elements of the information requested, full disclosure of that information was not deemed reconcilable with the duty to protect confidential information.
Posledično je Komisija menila, da bi CCCMC lahko odobrili dostop do, na primer, nizov in/ali indeksiranih elementov zahtevanih informacij, medtem ko popolno razkritje teh informacij ni združljivo z dolžnostjo varovanja zaupnih informacij.
In like measure, and because the Union legislator did not foresee this exception in the basic Regulation, the Commission considered that the fact that the lawyers registered at a European bar association are subject to strict bar rules and are potentially subject to sanctions in case of breach of these rules does not allow the Commission services to grant access contrary to the applicable legislation.
Zaradi enakih razlogov in ker zakonodajalec Unije ni predvidel te izjeme v osnovni uredbi, je Komisija menila, da dejstvo, da za odvetnike, ki so registrirani pri Evropski odvetniški zbornici, veljajo stroga pravila zbornice in da so ob kršitvi teh pravil deležni disciplinskih ukrepov, službam Komisije ne omogoča, da bi odobrile dostop v nasprotju z veljavno zakonodajo.
The Commission thus concluded that the access to confidential information by lawyers registered at a European bar association could not be granted.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da odvetnikom, registriranim pri Evropski odvetniški zbornici, ni mogoče odobriti dostopa do zaupnih informacij.
In any case, an additional element for safeguarding, in this respect, the rights of defence of interested parties, is the possibility of having recourse to the Hearing Officer in Trade Proceedings under Article 15 of his terms of reference [7] who did not call into question the Commission's position on confidentiality.
V vsakem primeru je pri tovrstnih zadevah dodatni element za zaščito pravice zainteresiranih strani do obrambe možnost posredovanja pooblaščenca za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih v skladu z njegovimi pooblastili, kot določa člen 15 [7].
Hence, the Commission deemed the information provided in the disclosure documents sufficient to satisfy the former's rights of defence.
Zato je Komisija menila, da informacije iz dokumentov o razkritju zadoščajo za izpolnitev njihove pravice do obrambe.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample interested parties, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo morda izbrala vzorec zainteresiranih strani v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
On the basis of information provided by the applicant, the Commission found that the PRC ceramic industry was largely fragmented with 1452 producers in 2014.
Komisija je na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložil vložnik, ugotovila, da je keramična industrija LRK zelo razdrobljena, saj je leta 2014 vključevala 1452 proizvajalcev.
Therefore, in view of the apparently large number of exporting producers in the PRC, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of Initiation.
Zaradi očitno velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK je v obvestilu o začetku predvidela vzorčenje.
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known exporting producers in the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je Komisija vse znane proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK pozvala, naj predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
In addition, it asked the mission of the PRC to the Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Poleg tega je pozvala predstavništvo LRK v Uniji, naj opredeli morebitne druge proizvajalce izvoznike, ki bi jih zanimalo sodelovanje v preiskavi, ali stopi v stik z njimi.
In total, the information specified in the Notice of Initiation was sent to 119 companies in the PRC.
Informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku, so bile poslane skupno 119 družbam v LRK.
Nineteen producers or group of producers in the PRC provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Devetnajst proizvajalcev ali skupin proizvajalcev iz LRK je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
Given the number of companies which could have come forward, this was considered low cooperation.
Glede na število družb, ki bi se lahko javile, je bila stopnja sodelovanja ocenjena kot nizka.