natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having determined that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 15 December 2015, by notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [9] (‘the Notice of Initiation’) the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.
Komisija je ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, in zato je 15. decembra 2015 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [9] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009.
By a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 15 December 2015 [10], the Commission also announced the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 [11] of the definitive countervailing measures in force with regard to imports into the Union of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India.
Komisija je 15. decembra 2015 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [10], napovedala tudi začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 [11], za dokončne izravnalne ukrepe, veljavne za uvoz nekaterih sistemov grafitnih elektrod s poreklom iz Indije v Unijo.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation the Commission selected the sample on the basis of the largest representative volume of sales which could reasonably be investigated within the time available, considering also the geographical location.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega prodaje, ki ga je mogoče v razpoložljivem času dovolj dobro preiskati, tudi ob upoštevanju geografske lokacije.
The sampled Union producers accounted for above 80 % of the total Union production, based on information received during standing exercise.
Na podlagi informacij, prejetih med ugotavljanjem reprezentativnosti, so vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije obsegali več kot 80 % celotne proizvodnje v Uniji.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all sampled Union producers, two Indian exporting producers and 53 users that came forward after initiation.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, dvema indijskima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma in 53 uporabnikom, ki so izrazili pripravljenost po začetku postopka.
Questionnaire replies were received from the four sampled Union producers, one Indian exporting producer and eight users of the product under review.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je prejela od štirih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, enega indijskega proizvajalca izvoznika in osmih uporabnikov izdelka, ki se pregleduje.
The second exporting producer cooperating in the original investigation, namely Graphite India Limited (‘GIL’), did not submit a questionnaire reply in the present review.
Drugi proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je sodeloval v prvotni preiskavi, tj. Graphite India Limited („GIL“), se je odločil, da v tem pregledu ne bo izpolnil vprašalnika.
Graftech Iberica S.L., Navarra, Spain
SGL Carbon S.A., Wiesbaden, Nemčija;
SGL Carbon S.A., Wiesbaden, Germany
Tokai Erftcarbon GmbH, Grevenbroich, Nemčija;
Tokai Erftcarbon GmbH, Grevenbroich, Germany
proizvajalec izvoznik v Indiji:
Exporting producer in India:
HEG Limited, Bhopal („HEG“).
HEG Limited, Bhopal (‘HEG’).
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom in obravnavano obdobje
Review investigation period and period considered
Preiskava v zvezi z verjetnostjo nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2014 do 30. septembra 2015 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 October 2014 to 30 September 2015 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2012 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2012 to the end of the review investigation period (the ‘period considered’).
B. ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
Product concerned
Zadevni izdelek so grafitne elektrode, ki se uporabljajo za električne peči, nasipne gostote 1,65 g/cm3 ali več in električne upornosti 6,0 μ.Ω.m ali manj, ter šobe, ki se uporabljajo za take elektrode, ne glede na to, ali so uvožene skupaj ali ločeno, s poreklom iz Indije („GES“ ali „izdelek, ki se pregleduje“), in se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex85451100 (oznaka TARIC 8545110010) in ex85459090 (oznaka TARIC 8545909010).
The product concerned is graphite electrodes of a kind used for electric furnaces, with an apparent density of 1,65 g/cm3 or more and an electrical resistance of 6,0 μ.Ω.m or less, and nipples used for such electrodes, whether imported together or separately originating in India (‘GES’ or ‘the product under review’), currently falling within CN codes ex85451100 (TARIC code 8545110010) and ex85459090 (TARIC code 8545909010).
Podobni izdelek
Like product
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo naslednji izdelki enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe:
The investigation showed that the following products have the same basic physical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses:
izdelek, ki se pregleduje;
the product under review;
izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije.
the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry.
Komisija je sklenila, da sta ta izdelka podobna izdelka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Preliminary remarks
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi se zaradi izteka veljavnosti obstoječih ukrepov damping nadaljeval ali ponovil.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 18, je v tej preiskavi sodeloval le en indijski proizvajalec izvoznik.
As mentioned above in recital (18) only one Indian exporting producer cooperated in the current investigation.
Ta družba je v OPP pokrivala več kot 95 % izvoza GES iz Indije v Unijo.
This company covered more than 95 % of the exports of GES from India into the Union during the RIP.
Zato je Komisija menila, da ima dovolj informacij za oceno izvozne cene in stopnje dampinga v OPP.
Therefore, the Commission considered that it had sufficient information for the assessment of the export price and the dumping margin during the RIP.
Vendar je ta proizvajalec izvoznik obsegal le 50 % celotne proizvodne zmogljivosti in le 40–50 % celotne proizvodnje GES v OPP v Indiji.
However, this exporting producer represented only 50 % of the total production capacity and only between 40 % and 50 % of the total production of GES in India during the RIP.
Poleg tega je njegov izvoz v druge tretje države v OPP obsegal le 43–52 % celotnega izvoza iz Indije v druge tretje države (točne teže edinega sodelujočega indijskega proizvajalca izvoznika v celotni indijski proizvodnji in celotnega izvoza zaradi zaupnosti ni mogoče razkriti).
Moreover, its exports to other third countries ranged only between 43 % and 52 % of total exports from India to other third countries during the RIP (the exact weight of the sole cooperating Indian exporting producer in the total Indian production and total exports cannot be disclosed for confidentiality reasons).
Zaradi navedenega in glede na to, da drugi indijski proizvajalec GES ni sodeloval, je Komisija menila, da nima dovolj informacij za proučitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode, zato je morala razvoj uvoza v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov oceniti na podlagi dostopnih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, and considering that the other Indian producer of GES did not cooperate, the Commission considered that it did not have sufficient information for the examination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury and use had to be made of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation in order to assess the development of imports should measures be repealed.
Indijski organi so bili ustrezno obveščeni, da lahko Komisija zaradi nizke stopnje sodelovanja indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov uporabi člen 18 osnovne uredbe.
The Indian authorities were duly informed that due to the low cooperation of the Indian exporting producers, the Commission may apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi s tem ni bila prejeta nobena pripomba.
No comments were received in this respect.
Ugotovitve iz oddelka 3 zato temeljijo na dostopnih dejstvih.
The findings in Section 3 were thus based on facts available.
Za ta namen so bile uporabljene informacije, ki jih je zagotovil sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa, statistični podatki Eurostata, podatki, ki so jih zbrale države članice v skladu s členom 14(6) osnovne uredbe („zbirka podatkov iz člena 14(6)“), in javno dostopne informacije.
For this purpose, the information provided by the cooperating exporting producer, the request for the expiry review, Eurostat statistics, the data collected by Member States pursuant to Article 14(6) of the basic Regulation (‘14(6) database’) and publicly available information were used.
Damping v Uniji v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
Dumping in the Union during the review investigation period
Normalna vrednost
Normal value
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali je celotni obseg domače prodaje edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika reprezentativen.
The Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales for the sole cooperating exporting producer was representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Domača prodaja je reprezentativna, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu na proizvajalca izvoznika v OPP predstavljal vsaj 5 % njegovega celotnega obsega izvoza izdelka, ki se pregleduje, v Unijo.
The domestic sales are representative if the total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers on the domestic market per exporting producer represented at least 5 % of its total export sales volume of the product under review to the Union during the RIP.
Na podlagi tega je bilo za edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika ugotovljeno, da je bil celotni obseg njegove prodaje podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu reprezentativen.
On this basis, the total sales of the sole cooperating exporting producer of the like product on the domestic market were representative.
Komisija je za proizvajalce izvoznike z reprezentativno domačo prodajo naknadno ugotovila, katere vrste izdelka, prodane na domačem trgu, so bile enake vrstam izdelka, prodanim za izvoz v Unijo, ali primerljive z njimi.
The Commission subsequently identified the product types sold domestically that were identical or comparable with the product types sold for export to the Union for the exporting producer with representative domestic sales.
Pri opredeljevanju vrst GES so bili upoštevani naslednji elementi, in sicer i) ali so bili prodani z elektrodnim nastavkom ali brez, ii) premer in iii) dolžina.
The elements taken into account in defining the product types of GES were (i) whether they were sold with a nipple or not, (ii) their diameter and (iii) their length.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi bilo treba pri opredeljevanju identičnih ali neposredno primerljivih vrst GES upoštevati tudi dejstvo, da se GES proizvajajo iz različno kakovostnega igelnega koksa (osnovna surovina).
The cooperating exporting producer claimed that the fact that GES are produced from different grades of needle coke (basic raw material) should be taken into account when establishing identical or directly comparable types of GES.
Preiskava je dejansko potrdila, da je družba v proizvodnem procesu uporabljala dve različni vrsti igelnega koksa, tj. uvoženi kakovostnejši igelni koks in igelni običajni koks, ki izhaja z indijskega trga.
Indeed, the investigation confirmed that in the production process, the company used two different types of needle coke, that is imported needle coke which is of a superior quality and regular needle coke sourced on the Indian market.
Potrjeno je bilo tudi, da so od vrste uporabljenega koksa odvisni stroški proizvodnje in cena končnega izdelka.
It was also confirmed that the type of coke used determines the cost of production and the price of the end product.
Da bi tako Komisija zagotovila pošteno primerjavo, je za izračun dampinga vsako vrsto izdelka razdelila na nizkokakovostne in visokokakovostne izdelke.
Therefore, in order to ensure a fair comparison, the Commission split each of the product types into low-grade and high-grade products for the purpose of the dumping calculation.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je domača prodaja edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika na njegovem domačem trgu reprezentativna za posamezne vrste izdelka, ki so enake vrstam, prodanim za izvoz v Unijo, ali primerljive z njimi.
The Commission then examined whether the domestic sales by the sole cooperating exporting producer on its domestic market for each product type that is identical or comparable with a product type sold for export to the Union were representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Domača prodaja vrste izdelka je reprezentativna, če skupni obseg domače prodaje te vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam v OPP predstavlja vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza enake ali podobne vrste izdelka v Unijo.
The domestic sales of a product type are representative if the total volume of domestic sales of that product type to independent customers during the RIP represents at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the identical or comparable product type to the Union.
Komisija je ugotovila, da so bile te vrste izdelka reprezentativne.
The Commission established that these product types were representative.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe za vsako vrsto izdelka določila delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v OPP, da bi sprejela odločitev, ali bo za izračun normalne vrednosti uporabila dejansko domačo prodajno ceno.
The Commission next defined the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market for each product type during the RIP in order to decide whether to use actual domestic sales price for the calculation of the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost temelji na dejanski domači ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne:
The normal value is based on the actual domestic price per product type, irrespective of whether those sales are profitable or not, if:
če je obseg domače prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, enaki izračunanim proizvodnim stroškom ali višji od njih, zajemal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka ter
the domestic sales volume of the product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of this product type; and
če je tehtana povprečna prodajna cena te vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od proizvodnih stroškov na enoto.
the weighted average sales price of that product type is equal to or higher than the unit cost of production.
V tem primeru je normalna vrednost tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje navedene vrste izdelka v OPP.
In this case, the normal value is the weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that product type during the RIP.
Normalna vrednost je dejanska domača cena za posamezno vrsto izdelka, in sicer izključno pri dobičkonosni domači prodaji teh vrst izdelka v OPP:
The normal value is the actual domestic price per product type of only the profitable domestic sales of the product types during the RIP, if:
če obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka predstavlja 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka ali
the volume of profitable sales of the product type represents 80 % or less of the total sales volume of this type: or
je tehtana povprečna cena te vrste izdelka nižja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
the weighted average price of this product type is below the unit cost of production.
Če prodaje vrste podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine ni bilo ali ni bila zadostna, je Komisija normalno vrednost konstruirala v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
Where there were no or insufficient sales of a product type of the like product in the ordinary course of trade, the Commission constructed the normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Za take vrste izdelka je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da se je povprečnim proizvodnim stroškom podobnega izdelka edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v OPP prištelo naslednje:
For such product types normal value was constructed by adding to the average cost of production of the like product of the sole cooperating exporting producer during the RIP:
tehtano povprečje prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov („PSA-stroški“) edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki so v OPP nastali pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine, ter
the weighted average selling, general and administrative (‘SG&A’) expenses incurred by the sole cooperating exporting producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the RIP; and
tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki ga je v OPP dosegel edini sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine.
the weighted average profit realised by the sole cooperating exporting producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the RIP.
Za vrste izdelka, ki se na domačem trgu sploh niso prodajale, so bili dodani tehtani povprečni PSA-stroški in dobiček od transakcij, opravljenih na domačem trgu v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine.
For the product types not sold at all on the domestic market, the weighted average SG&A expenses and profit of all transactions made in the ordinary course of trade on the domestic market were added.
Izvozna cena
Export price
Edini sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je izdelke izvažal v Unijo neposredno neodvisnim strankam.
The sole cooperating exporting producer exported to the Union directly to independent customers.
Zato je bila izvozna cena tista, ki se je dejansko plačevala ali se plačuje za zadevni izdelek ob prodaji za izvoz v Unijo, v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, the export price was the price actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Med preverjanjem na kraju samem so bile v izvoznih cenah, ki jih je sporočil sodelujoči izvoznik, ugotovljene številne napake.
During the on-spot verification, a number of mistakes have been found in the export prices reported by the cooperating exporter.
Te napake so bile popravljene in proizvajalec izvoznik je bil ustrezno obveščen.
These mistakes have been corrected and the exporting producer has been duly informed.
Primerjava
Comparison
Komisija je normalno vrednost in zgoraj ugotovljeno izvozno ceno primerjala na podlagi franko tovarna.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price as established above on an ex-works basis.
Kadar je bilo to potrebno zaradi zagotovitve poštene primerjave, je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno prilagodila za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
Where justified by the need to ensure a fair comparison, the Commission adjusted the normal value and/or the export price for differences affecting prices and price comparability, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za stroške prevoza, zavarovanja, manipuliranja, natovarjanja in druge dodatne stroške, kreditne in bančne stroške ter izravnalne dajatve, ki jih je sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik plačal po potrebi in kadar je bilo upravičeno.
Adjustments were made for transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packaging, credit costs, bank charges and countervailing duties paid by the cooperating exporting producer where applicable and justified.
Edini sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval prilagoditev za uvozne dajatve na surovine, plačane v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe, ker naj bi uvozne dajatve bremenile GES, proizvedene za potrošnjo v Indiji, vendar so bile v skladu s shemo povračil dajatev (Duty Drawback Scheme; „shema DDS“) povrnjene, ko je bil izdelek izvožen v Unijo.
The sole cooperating exporting producer claimed an adjustment for import charges on raw materials paid in accordance with Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation, on the grounds that import charges were borne by GES produced for consumption in India but were refunded by means of the duty drawback scheme (‘DDS’) when the product was sold for export to the Union.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da ni bilo neposredne povezave med zneski sheme DDS, prejetimi za izvoz GES, in dajatvami, ki so bile dejansko plačane za vključene uvožene surovine.
The investigation showed however that there was no direct link between DDS amounts received on exports of GES and duties actually paid on incorporated imported raw material.
Zato velja, da proizvajalec izvoznik ni dokazal vključenosti vrnjenega davka na izvoz v domačo ceno.
Therefore it is considered that the exporting producer failed to prove that a tax refunded on export sales was included in the domestic price.
To je bilo potrjeno tudi v uvodnih izjavah 38 do 42 vzporedne protisubvencijske preiskave, v kateri je bilo ugotovljeno, da shema DDS pomeni subvencijo v obliki finančnega prispevka indijske vlade ter da je ni mogoče šteti za dovoljeni sistem povračil dajatev ali sistem nadomestnega povračila.
This was also confirmed in recitals (38) to (42) of the parallel anti-subsidy investigation where it was established that the DDS constitutes a subsidy in the form of a financial contribution by the Government of India and cannot be considered a permissible duty drawback system or substitution drawback system.
Zato prilagoditve ni mogoče odobriti.
Therefore the adjustment cannot be granted.
Poleg tega je sodelujoči indijski proizvajalec izvoznik zahteval prilagoditev na podlagi člena 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe, ker naj bi bile uvozne dajatve domnevno zaračunane za podobni izdelek, namenjen potrošnji v Indiji, a zaradi sheme vnaprejšnjih odobritev (Advanced Authorisation Scheme; „shema AAS“) niso bile pobrane, ko je bil izdelek izvožen v Unijo.
Moreover the cooperating Indian exporting producer claimed an adjustment based on Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation on the grounds that import charges were allegedly borne by the like product when intended for consumption in India but were not collected due to the Advanced Authorisation Scheme (‘AAS’) when the product was sold for export to the Union.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da ni bilo vzpostavljenega nobenega sistema za preverjanje, da so bile surovine, ki so bile brezcarinsko dajatev prosto uvožene v skladu s shemo AAS, izrecno vključene v izvožene GES.
The investigation however showed that there was no system in place to ascertain that raw material imported duty free under AAS was exclusively incorporated in exported GES.
Zato Komisija meni, da proizvajalec izvoznik ni dokazal, da je bil neplačani davek na izvoz vključen v domačo ceno.