natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The system of verification and accreditation should avoid any unnecessary duplication of procedures and organisations established pursuant to other Union legal instruments as it would result in an increased burden for Member States or economic operators.
V okviru sistema za preverjanje in akreditacijo se je treba izogniti nepotrebnemu podvajanju postopkov in organizacij, vzpostavljenih na podlagi drugih pravnih instrumentov Unije, saj bi to povečalo obremenitev držav članic ali gospodarskih subjektov.
Therefore, it is appropriate to draw on best practices resulting from the application of harmonised standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation on the basis of a remit issued by the Commission in accordance with Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] (such as those concerning requirements for greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies for use in accreditation or other forms of recognition, and concerning general requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union), Document EA-6/03 and other technical documents developed by European cooperation for Accreditation.
Zato je primerno uporabiti najboljše prakse, ki temeljijo na uporabi harmoniziranih standardov, ki jih je sprejel Evropski odbor za standardizacijo na podlagi mandata, ki ga je Komisija podelila v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], (kot sta harmonizirani standard glede zahtev za organe za potrjevanje in preverjanje toplogrednih plinov, ki se uporablja pri akreditaciji ali drugih oblikah priznavanja, in glede splošnih zahtev za akreditacijske organe, ki akreditirajo organe za ocenjevanje skladnosti, pri čemer so sklicevanja nanju objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije) ter dokumenta EA-6/03 in drugih tehničnih dokumentov, ki jih je pripravilo Evropsko združenje za akreditacijo.
Harmonised rules for the assessment of monitoring plans, the verification of emissions reports and the issuance of documents of compliance by verifiers should clearly define the verifiers' responsibilities and activities.
V harmoniziranih pravilih za preveritelje glede ocenjevanja načrtov za spremljanje, preverjanja poročil o emisijah in izdaje listin o skladnosti je treba jasno opredeliti pristojnosti in dejavnosti preveriteljev.
When assessing a monitoring plan, verifiers should perform a number of activities to evaluate the completeness, relevance and conformity of the information submitted by the company in question as regards the ship's monitoring and reporting process in order to be able to conclude whether the plan is in conformity with Regulation (EU) 2015/757.
Pri ocenjevanju načrtov za spremljanje morajo preveritelji izvesti vrsto dejavnosti za oceno popolnosti, relevantnosti in skladnosti informacij, ki jih je zadevna družba predložila v zvezi s postopkom spremljanja in poročanja na ladji, da lahko ugotovijo, ali je načrt skladen z Uredbo (EU) 2015/757.
Pursuant to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1927 [4], when submitting the ship's monitoring plan, companies may refer to information on the ship's existing procedures and controls, as covered by harmonised quality, environmental and energy management standards (such as EN ISO 9001:2015, EN ISO 14001:2015, EN ISO 50001:2011) or under the International Safety Management (ISM) Code [5] or the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) [6].
V skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2016/1927 [4] se lahko družbe pri predložitvi načrta za spremljanje ladje sklicujejo na informacije o obstoječih postopkih in kontrolah ladje, ki jih zajemajo harmonizirani standardi o kakovosti, okolju in upravljanju z energijo (npr. EN ISO 9001:2015, EN ISO 14001:2015, EN ISO 50001:2011) ali ki so v okviru Mednarodnega kodeksa ravnanja za varno upravljanje ladij (Kodeks ISM) [5] ali načrta upravljanja energetske učinkovitosti za ladje (SEEMP) [6].
In order to ensure a streamlined approach, verifiers should be able to consider these to the extent that they are relevant for the monitoring and reporting of data under Regulation (EU) 2015/757 and this Regulation.
Da bi zagotovili usklajen pristop, je treba preveriteljem omogočiti, da jih preučijo, kolikor so relevantni za spremljanje in sporočanje podatkov v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2015/757 in to uredbo.
The provision of documents and the exchange of relevant information between companies and verifiers are essential for all aspects of the verification process, in particular for the assessment of the monitoring plan, the performance of the risk assessment and verification of the emissions report.
Zagotavljanje dokumentov in izmenjava relevantnih informacij med družbami in preveritelji sta bistvena za vse vidike postopka preverjanja, zlasti za oceno načrta za spremljanje, izvedbo ocene tveganja in preverjanje poročila o emisijah.
It is necessary to establish a set of harmonised requirements governing the provision of information and documents to be made available to the verifier before it starts its verification activities and at other points in the course of the verification.
Treba je določiti sklop harmoniziranih zahtev za zagotavljanje informacij in dokumentov, ki se dajo na voljo preveritelju pred začetkom dejavnosti preverjanja in na drugih točkah v postopku preverjanja.
The verifier should take a risk-based approach in verifying the emissions report, in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2015/757.
Preveritelj mora pri preverjanju poročila o emisijah v skladu z odstavki 1, 2 in 3 člena 15 Uredbe (EU) 2015/757 uporabiti pristop, ki temelji na tveganju.
Analysis of the susceptibility of reported data to potential material misstatement is an essential part of the verification process and determines how the verifier should carry out its activities.
Analiza dovzetnosti sporočenih podatkov za morebiti bistvene napačne navedbe je bistven del postopka preverjanja, na podlagi katerega se določi, kako mora preveritelj opravljati dejavnosti preverjanja.
Every part of the process of verifying emissions reports, including site visits, is closely linked to the outcome of the analysis of the risk of misstatement.
Cel postopek preverjanja poročil o emisijah, vključno z obiski na kraju samem, je tesno povezan z rezultati analize tveganja napačnih navedb.
The verifier should be obliged to adjust one or more verification activities in the light of the findings and information obtained during the verification process, in order to meet the requirements of achieving reasonable assurance.
Preveritelja je treba zavezati k prilagoditvi ene ali več dejavnosti preverjanja glede na ugotovitve in informacije, pridobljene med postopkom preverjanja, da se izpolnijo zahteve doseganja razumnega zagotovila.
In order to ensure consistency and comparability of monitored data over time in accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, the monitoring plan that has been assessed as satisfactory should be the reference point for the verifier when assessing a ship's emissions report.
Da bi v skladu s členom 4(3) Uredbe (EU) 2015/757 zagotovili skladnost in primerljivost spremljanih podatkov, mora biti načrt za spremljanje, ki je bil ocenjen kot zadovoljiv, za preveritelja referenčna točka pri ocenjevanju ladijskega poročila o emisijah.
The verifier should assess whether the plan and the requisite procedures have been implemented correctly.
Preveritelj mora oceniti, ali so bili načrt in potrebni postopki izvedeni pravilno.
It notifies the company of any non-conformities or misstatements that it identifies.
Družbo obvesti o morebitnih neskladnostih ali napačnih navedbah, ki jih ugotovi.
The verifier reports uncorrected misstatements or non-conformities leading to material errors in a verification report stating that the emissions report is not in compliance with Regulation (EU) 2015/757 and this Regulation.
Preveritelj sporoči nepopravljene napačne navedbe ali neodpravljene neskladnosti, ki vodijo do pomembnih napak v poročilu o preverjanju, in navede, da poročilo o emisijah ni v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2015/757 ter to uredbo.
All activities in the emissions report's verification process are interconnected and should culminate in the issuance of a verification report containing a statement of the outcome of the verification.
Vse dejavnosti v okviru postopka preverjanja poročila o emisijah so medsebojno povezane in se morajo končati z izdajo poročila o preverjanju, ki vsebuje izjavo o rezultatih preverjanja.
The level of assurance should relate to the depth and detail of the verification activities and the wording of the verification statement.
Stopnja zagotovila mora biti povezana s tem, kako temeljito in natančno so bile opravljene dejavnosti preverjanja, ter z besedilom izjave o preverjanju.
Harmonised requirements for the performance of verification activities and the verification reports would ensure that all verifiers apply the same standards.
Harmonizirane zahteve za izvajanje dejavnosti preverjanja in poročila o preverjanju bi zagotovile, da bi vsi preveritelji uporabljali iste standarde.
Verification activities, including the assessment of monitoring plans and the verification of emissions reports, should be carried out by competent verifiers and personnel.
Dejavnosti preverjanja, vključno z ocenjevanjem načrtov za spremljanje in preverjanjem poročil o emisijah, morajo opraviti usposobljeni preveritelji in osebje.
In order to ensure that the personnel involved are competent to perform the tasks entrusted to them, verifiers should establish and continuously improve internal processes.
Za zagotovitev usposobljenosti zadevnega osebja za opravljanje nalog, ki so jim zaupane, morajo preveritelji uvesti in stalno izboljševati notranje postopke.
To promote high quality in verification activities, harmonised rules should be laid down to determine whether a verifier is competent, independent and impartial and thus qualified to carry out the requisite activities.
Za spodbujanje visoke kakovosti dejavnosti preverjanja je treba oblikovati harmonizirana pravila, da se določi, ali je preveritelj usposobljen, neodvisen in nepristranski in lahko torej opravlja potrebne dejavnosti.
An overall framework of rules for the accreditation of legal entities is necessary to ensure that verifiers possess the technical competence to perform the tasks entrusted to them independently, impartially and in conformity with the requirements and principles set out in Regulation (EU) 2015/757, Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 and this Regulation.
Potreben je splošen okvir pravil za akreditacijo pravnih subjektov, da se zagotovi, da so preveritelji tehnično usposobljeni za izvajanje zaupanih nalog neodvisno, nepristransko in v skladu z zahtevami in načeli iz Uredbe (EU) 2015/757, Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008 in te uredbe.
In accordance with Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, Articles 4 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 should apply to general principles and requirements for national accreditation bodies.
V skladu s členom 16(2) Uredbe (EU) 2015/757 se morajo za splošna načela in zahteve za nacionalne akreditacijske organe uporabljati členi 4–12 Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008.
In line with the Commission's usual practice of consulting experts when preparing draft delegated acts, a ‘shipping MRV verification and accreditation subgroup’ gathering experts from Member States, industry and other relevant organisations, including civil society, was set up under the umbrella of the European Sustainable Shipping Forum (ESSF).
V skladu z običajno prakso Komisije, da se pri pripravi osnutkov delegiranih aktov posvetuje s strokovnjaki, je bila pod okriljem Evropskega foruma za trajnostni pomorski promet (ESSF) ustanovljena „podskupina za preverjanje in akreditacijo spremljanja, poročanja in preverjanja pri ladijskem prevozu“, ki združuje strokovnjake iz držav članic, industrije in drugih relevantnih organizacij, vključno s civilno družbo.
The subgroup recommended that a number of elements be covered by this Regulation.
Podskupina je priporočila vrsto elementov, ki naj jih zajema ta uredba.
The ESSF plenary endorsed its draft recommendations on those aspects on 28 June 2016,
Evropski forum za trajnostni pomorski promet je na plenarnem zasedanju 28. junija 2016 potrdil njihove osnutke priporočil o navedenih vidikih –
This Regulation lays down provisions concerning the assessment of monitoring plans and verification of emissions reports.
Ta uredba predpisuje določbe glede ocenjevanja načrtov za spremljanje in preverjanje poročil o emisijah.
It also lays down requirements in terms of competences and procedures.
Določa tudi zahteve glede usposobljenosti in postopkov.
This Regulation lays down rules on accreditation and supervision of verifiers by national accreditation bodies pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.
Ta uredba določa pravila za akreditacijo preveriteljev in nadzor nad njimi s strani nacionalnih akreditacijskih organov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 765/2008.
‘accreditation’ means attestation by a national accreditation body that a verifier meets the requirements of harmonised standards within the meaning of point (9) of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 and the requirements of this Regulation and is thus qualified to carry out the verification activities pursuant to Chapter II;
„akreditacija“ pomeni potrditev s strani nacionalnega akreditacijskega organa, da preveritelj izpolnjuje zahteve harmoniziranih standardov v smislu člena 2(9) Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008 in zahteve iz te uredbe ter je zato usposobljen za opravljanje dejavnosti preverjanja v skladu s poglavjem II;
for the purpose of assessing a monitoring plan, that the plan does not fulfil requirements under Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EU) 2015/757 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1927;
za namene ocenjevanja načrta za spremljanje – da načrt ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz členov 6 in 7 Uredbe (EU) 2015/757 ter Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2016/1927;
for the purpose of verifying an emissions report, that the CO2 emissions and other relevant information are not reported in line with the monitoring methodology described in a monitoring plan that an accredited verifier has assessed as satisfactory;
za namene preverjanja poročil o emisijah – da emisije CO2 in druge relevantne informacije niso sporočene v skladu z metodologijo spremljanja, opisano v načrtu za spremljanje, ki ga je akreditirani preveritelj ocenil kot zadovoljivega;
for the purpose of accreditation, any act or omission by the verifier that is contrary to requirements under Regulation (EU) 2015/757 and this Regulation;
za namene akreditacije – vsako dejanje ali opustitev s strani preveritelja, ki je v nasprotju z zahtevami iz Uredbe (EU) 2015/757 in te uredbe;
‘reasonable assurance’ means a high but not absolute level of assurance, expressed positively in the verification statement, as to whether the emissions report subject to verification is free of material misstatements;
„razumno zagotovilo“ pomeni visoko, vendar ne absolutno stopnjo zagotovila, pozitivno izraženega v izjavi o preverjanju, da poročilo o emisijah, ki se preverja, ne vsebuje bistvenih napačnih navedb;
‘materiality level’ means the quantitative threshold or cut-off point above which the verifier considers misstatements, individually or taken together, to be material;
„raven pomembnosti“ pomeni količinski prag ali mejno vrednost, nad katero preveritelj napačne navedbe vsako posebej ali skupaj z drugimi šteje za bistvene;
‘inherent risk’ means the susceptibility of a parameter in the emissions report to misstatements that could be material, individually or taken together, before taking into consideration the effect of any related control activities;
„tveganje pri delovanju“ pomeni dovzetnost parametra v poročilu o emisijah za napačne navedbe, ki bi bile lahko vsaka posebej ali skupaj z drugimi bistvene, preden se upošteva učinek vseh povezanih dejavnosti kontroliranja;
‘control risk’ means the susceptibility of a parameter in the emissions report to misstatements that could be material, individually or when taken together with other misstatements, and will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis by the control system;
„tveganje pri kontroliranju“ pomeni dovzetnost parametra v poročilu o emisijah za napačne navedbe, ki bi bile lahko vsaka posebej ali skupaj z drugimi napačnimi navedbami bistvene in jih sistem kontroliranja ne prepreči ali zazna in popravi pravočasno;
‘detection risk’ means the risk of a verifier not detecting a material misstatement;
„tveganje pri odkrivanju“ pomeni tveganje, da preveritelj ne odkrije bistvene napačne navedbe;
‘verification risk’ means the risk (a function of inherent, control and detection risk) of the verifier expressing an inappropriate verification opinion when the emissions report is not free of material misstatements;
„tveganje pri preverjanju“ pomeni tveganje, da bi preveritelj izrazil neprimerno mnenje pri preverjanju, če so v poročilu o emisijah bistvene napačne navedbe, pri čemer je to tveganje lahko tveganje pri delovanju, pri kontroliranju in pri odkrivanju;
‘misstatement’ means an omission, misrepresentation or error in the reported data, apart from the uncertainty permissible pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/757 and taking into consideration the guidelines developed by the Commission on these matters;
„napačna navedba“ pomeni izpustitev, napačno prikazovanje ali napako v sporočenih podatkih, pri čemer se negotovost, dovoljena v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2015/757, ne upošteva, upoštevajo pa se smernice Komisije o teh zadevah;
‘material misstatement’ means a misstatement that, in the opinion of the verifier, individually or when taken together with other misstatements, exceeds the materiality level or could otherwise, have an impact on the total reported emissions or other relevant information;
„bistvena napačna navedba“ pomeni napačno navedbo, ki po mnenju preveritelja posebej ali skupaj z drugimi napačnimi navedbami presega raven pomembnosti ali ki bi lahko vplivala na skupne sporočene emisije ali druge relevantne informacije;
‘site’, for the purposes of assessing the monitoring plan or verifying the emissions report of a ship, means a location where the monitoring process is defined and managed, including locations where relevant data and information are controlled and stored;
„kraj sam“ za namene ocenjevanja načrta za spremljanje ali preverjanja poročila o emisijah ladje pomeni lokacijo, na kateri se opredeli in upravlja postopek spremljanja, vključno z lokacijami, na katerih se kontrolirajo in shranjujejo relevantni podatki in informacije;
‘internal verification documentation’ means all internal documentation that a verifier has compiled to record documentary evidence and justification of activities carried out to assess the monitoring plan or verify an emissions report pursuant to this Regulation;
„notranja dokumentacija o preverjanju“ pomeni vso notranjo dokumentacijo, ki jo zbere preveritelj, da zabeleži dokumentarne dokaze in utemeljitve o dejavnostih, ki se opravljajo pri ocenjevanju načrta za spremljanje ali preverjanju poročila o emisijah v skladu s to uredbo;
‘shipping MRV auditor’ means an individual member of a verification team responsible for assessing a monitoring plan or verifying an emissions report;
„revizor spremljanja, poročanja in preverjanja pri ladijskem prevozu“ pomeni posameznega člana skupine za preverjanje, ki je odgovoren za ocenjevanje načrta za spremljanje ali preverjanje poročila o emisijah;
‘independent reviewer’ means a person assigned by the verifier specifically to carry out internal review activities, who belongs to the same entity but has not carried out any of the verification activities subject to review;
„neodvisni pregledovalec“ pomeni osebo, ki jo preveritelj določi posebej za izvedbo dejavnosti notranjega pregleda in ki pripada istemu subjektu, vendar ni opravila nobene dejavnosti preverjanja, ki se pregleduje;
‘technical expert’ means a person who provides detailed knowledge and expertise on a specific matter as required for the performance of verification activities for the purposes of Chapter II and accreditation activities for the purposes of Chapters IV and V;
„tehnični strokovnjak“ pomeni osebo, ki zagotovi podrobno strokovno znanje in izkušnje o posebnih vsebinah, potrebne za opravljanje dejavnosti preverjanja za namene poglavja II in dejavnosti akreditiranja za namene poglavij IV in V;
‘assessor’ means a person assigned by a national accreditation body to assess a verifier pursuant to this Regulation, individually or as part of an assessment team;
„ocenjevalec“ pomeni osebo, ki jo nacionalni akreditacijski organ določi za to, da sam ali kot del ocenjevalne skupine oceni preveritelja v skladu s to uredbo;
‘lead assessor’ means an assessor who is given overall responsibility for the assessment of a verifier pursuant to this Regulation.
„vodilni ocenjevalec“ pomeni ocenjevalca, ki je v celoti odgovoren za ocenjevanje preveritelja v skladu s to uredbo.
A verifier that demonstrates conformity with the criteria laid down in the relevant harmonised standards, within the meaning of Article 2(9) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, or parts thereof, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be presumed to comply with the requirements of Chapters II and III of this Regulation in so far as the applicable harmonised standards cover those requirements.
Če preveritelj dokaže skladnost z merili iz relevantnih harmoniziranih standardov v smislu člena 2(9) Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008 ali deli navedenih standardov, pri čemer so sklicevanja nanje objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, domnevno izpolnjuje zahteve iz poglavij II in III te uredbe, kolikor veljavni harmonizirani standardi zajemajo te zahteve.
VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES
DEJAVNOSTI PREVERJANJA
Assessment of monitoring plans
Ocenjevanje načrtov za spremljanje
Information to be provided by companies
Informacije, ki jih zagotovijo družbe
Companies shall provide the verifier with their ship's monitoring plan using a template corresponding to the model set out in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1927.
Družbe preveritelju za svojo ladjo predložijo načrt za spremljanje z uporabo predloge, ki ustreza vzorcu iz Priloge I k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) 2016/1927.
If the monitoring plan is in a language other than English, they shall provide an English translation.
Če načrt za spremljanje ni v angleščini, poskrbijo za angleški prevod.
Before the start of the assessment of the monitoring plan, the company shall also provide the verifier with at least the following information:
Pred začetkom ocenjevanja načrta za spremljanje družba preveritelju predloži tudi vsaj:
relevant documentation or description of the ship's installations, including emissions sources certificates, flow meters used (if applicable), procedures and processes or flowcharts prepared and maintained outside the plan, where applicable, to which reference is made in the plan;
relevantno dokumentacijo ali opis naprav na ladji, na katere se sklicuje načrt, vključno s potrdili o virih emisij, po potrebi uporabljenimi merilniki pretoka, po potrebi postopki ali diagrami poteka, ki so bili pripravljeni in vzdrževani zunaj načrta;
in the event of those changes to the monitoring and reporting system referred to in points (c) and (d) of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, relevant updated versions or new documents enabling the assessment of the amended plan.
v primeru sprememb sistema spremljanja in poročanja iz točk (c) in (d) člena 7(2) Uredbe (EU) 2015/757 relevantne posodobljene različice ali nove dokumente, ki omogočajo oceno spremenjenega načrta.
The company shall, upon request, provide any other information deemed relevant to carry out its assessment of the plan.
Družba na zahtevo predloži vse druge informacije, ki se štejejo kot relevantne za izvedbo ocene načrta.
When assessing the monitoring plan, the verifier shall address the assertions of completeness, accuracy, relevance and conformity with Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the information provided in the monitoring plan.
Pri ocenjevanju načrtov za spremljanje preveritelj obravnava trditve o popolnosti, točnosti, relevantnosti in skladnosti informacij, predloženih v načrtu za spremljanje, z Uredbo (EU) 2015/757.