natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case of short production-cycle species with a high turnover of animals, the number of animals in respect of which a livestock payment claim under the measure provided for in Article 33 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] is submitted, may change significantly throughout the claim year.
V primeru vrst s kratkim proizvodnim ciklom, tj. s hitrim menjavanjem živali, se število živali, za katere je bil predložen zahtevek za plačilo na žival v okviru ukrepa iz člena 33 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], lahko bistveno spremeni v letu zahtevka.
This may lead to a substantial difference between the number of animals declared in the livestock payment claim and the number of animals that will eventually benefit from increased welfare conditions.
To lahko povzroči precejšnjo razliko med številom prijavljenih živali v zahtevku za plačilo na žival in številom živali, ki bodo morda imele korist od boljših pogojev za njihovo dobrobit.
As a consequence, the number of animals declared in the livestock payment claim turns out to be only indicative.
Posledično se število živali, navedeno v zahtevku za plačilo na žival, izkaže le kot okvirno.
In respect of those short production-cycle species, Member States should therefore be allowed to establish a system which allows a beneficiary to apply for support in respect of all animals which qualify for support at a date or during a period determined by the Member State.
V zvezi z navedenimi vrstami s kratkim proizvodnim ciklom bi bilo zato državam članicam treba omogočiti, da vzpostavijo sistem, ki upravičencu omogoča, da zaprosi za podporo glede vseh živali, ki so upravičene do podpore na datum ali v obdobju, ki ga določi država članica.
In the absence of a computerised database, it should be possible to establish the actual number of animals on the basis of slaughter certificates or other supporting documents submitted to the competent authority after the date of submission of the livestock payment claim.
Če računalniških zbirk podatkov ni, bi moralo biti mogoče določiti dejansko število živali na podlagi potrdil o zakolu ali drugih spremnih dokumentov, predloženih pristojnemu organu po datumu predložitve zahtevka za plačilo na žival.
The application of selection criteria is not obligatory for all measures or types of operations.
Uporaba meril za izbiro ni obvezna za vse ukrepe ali vrste operacij.
Therefore, the administrative checks carried out on the applications for support should only include the verification of that element where necessary.
Zato bi morali upravni pregledi, opravljeni v zvezi z vlogami za podporo, vključevati le preverjanje navedenega elementa, kadar je to potrebno.
The verification of the reasonableness of the costs is made at the stage of the administrative checks relating to the application for support and on the basis of a defined evaluation system.
Preverjanje razumnosti stroškov se izvede v fazi upravnih pregledov v zvezi z vlogo za podporo in na podlagi natančno opredeljenega sistema ocenjevanja.
Specific rules should however apply where the risk of unreasonable costs is low or where the content of the costs may not be defined before the implementation of the operation.
Posebna pravila pa bi se morala uporabiti, kadar je tveganje nerazumnih stroškov nizko ali kadar vsebine stroškov ni mogoče opredeliti pred izvedbo operacije.
In accordance with Article 67(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], the amount of the support may be established on the basis of standard scales of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates.
V skladu s členom 67(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] se lahko znesek podpore določi na podlagi standardnih lestvic stroškov na enoto, pavšalnih zneskov ali pavšalnih stopenj.
In such cases, the administrative checks should not include the verification of the amount of the costs incurred and the payments made by the beneficiary.
V takih primerih upravni pregledi ne bi smeli zajemati preverjanja zneska nastalih stroškov in plačil, ki jih je opravil upravičenec.
The rules on checks which apply to financial instruments should be adapted in order to ensure consistency with the management and control rules laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 and in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 480/2014 [5] and to take into account the specificities of support granted in the form of a financial instrument.
Pravila o pregledih, ki veljajo za finančne instrumente, bi bilo treba prilagoditi, da se zagotovi skladnost s pravili za upravljanje in kontrolo iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 in Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 480/2014 [5] ter upošteva posebnosti podpore, ki se odobri v obliki finančnega instrumenta.
The expenditure subject to on-the-spot checks should not be the expenditure to be paid, but the expenditure claimed to the paying agency.
Pregledi na kraju samem ne bi smeli veljati za izdatke, ki jih je treba plačati, temveč za izdatke, ki se uveljavljajo pri plačilni agenciji.
Since the expenditure to be paid can only be determined after all checks have been completed, taking that expenditure as subject of checks would render the achievement of the control rate unpredictable.
Glede na to, da se izdatki, ki jih je treba plačati, lahko določijo šele po vseh opravljenih pregledih, bi pregled na podlagi navedenih izdatkov povzročil, da je doseganje stopnje kontrole nepredvidljivo.
In addition, the expenditure subject to on-the-spot checks should not include expenditure made by the paying agency only for advance payments, since that expenditure does not correspond to expenditure incurred by the beneficiary.
Poleg tega izdatki, ki so predmet pregledov na kraju samem, ne bi smeli vključevati izdatkov, ki jih izvede plačilna agencija le za predplačila, ker navedeni izdatki ne ustrezajo izdatkom, ki jih je imel upravičenec.
Furthermore, expenditure related to financial instruments should be counted towards the achievement of the minimum control rate only to the extent that it is actually checked by the competent authority.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba izdatke v zvezi s finančnimi instrumenti všteti v doseganje najmanjše stopnje kontrole le v obsegu, kakor jih dejansko preveri pristojni organ.
In order to ensure the fulfilment of the minimum control rate each calendar year, the checks should be performed by the date foreseen for the submission of the control data and control statistics laid down in Article 9 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014.
Za zagotovitev izpolnjevanja najmanjše stopnje kontrole za vsako koledarsko leto, bi morali biti pregledi opravljeni do datuma, določenega za predložitev kontrolnih podatkov in kontrolne statistike iz člena 9 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014.
In order not to duplicate checks unnecessarily, on-the-spot checks should only cover elements that have not yet been the subject of administrative checks.
Da ne bi po nepotrebnem podvajali preverjanj, bi morali pregledi na kraju samem zajemati le elemente, ki še niso bili predmet upravnih pregledov.
In accordance with Articles 48 and 51 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014, checks have to verify compliance with, inter alia, eligibility criteria, commitments and other obligations.
V skladu s členoma 48 in 51 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014 morajo pregledi med drugim preveriti skladnosti z merili za upravičenost, zavezami in drugimi obveznostmi.
Furthermore, according to Article 50(4)(a) of that Implementing Regulation, the sample of operations to be checked on-the-spot has to take into account the need to check an appropriate mix of types and sizes of operations.
Poleg tega mora v skladu s členom 50(4)(a) navedene izvedbene uredbe vzorec operacij, ki jih je treba pregledati na kraju samem, upoštevati potrebo po preverjanju ustrezne kombinacije operacij različnih vrst in obsegov.
The measure-specific provisions on the subject matter or the intensity of the checks laid down in Articles 54 to 59 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 are therefore unnecessary.
Določbe, povezane z ukrepom, ki zadevajo predmet ali intenzivnost pregledov iz členov od 54 do 59 Izvedbene Uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014, so zato nepotrebne.
As regards administrative penalties, in order to ensure equal treatment of the operations selected and the operations not selected for on-the-spot checks, the expenditure checked should, in both cases, be the expenditure claimed.
Kar zadeva upravne kazni, da bi zagotovili enako obravnavo izbranih operacij in operacij, ki niso bile izbrane za preglede na kraju samem, morajo biti pregledani izdatki v obeh primerih izdatki, ki se uveljavljajo.
However, taking into account the difficulties encountered in the claim year 2015 by the Member States having to adapt their systems to the deadline of submitting the livestock payment claim laid down in Article 13 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014, as well as to the system on reductions, exclusions and penalties provided for in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 [6], the provision allowing the actual number of animals of short production-cycle species to be established on the basis of slaughter certificates or other supporting documents submitted to the competent authority after the submission of the livestock payment claim should apply to livestock payment claims relating to claim years starting as from 1 January 2016.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Rural Development Committee,
Člen 1
Article 1
v členu 21 se vstavi naslednji odstavek 4a:
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 is amended as follows:
Za vrste s kratkim proizvodnim ciklom, ki prejemajo podporo v skladu s členom 33 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, lahko države članice, če računalniških zbirk podatkov ni, uvedejo postopke, s katerimi je treba uporabiti podatke iz potrdila o zakolu ali drugih spremnih dokumentov za namene zahtevka za plačilo na žival.
In Article 21, the following paragraph 4a is inserted:
Navedeni podatki omogočajo raven zanesljivosti in izvajanja, ki je potrebna za pravilno upravljanje zadevnega podpornega ukrepa na ravni posameznih živali.
For short production-cycle species supported under Article 33 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 Member States may, in the absence of a computerised database, introduce procedures by which data contained in the slaughter certificates or in other supporting documents are to be used for the purposes of the livestock payment claim.
Postopki iz prvega pododstavka lahko vključujejo sistem, po katerem upravičenec zaprosi za podporo za vse živali, ki na datum ali v obdobju, ki ga določi država članica, izpolnjujejo pogoje za podporo na podlagi podatkov, navedenih v potrdilih o zakolu ali drugih spremnih dokumentih.
Those data shall offer the level of assurance and implementation necessary for the proper management of the support measure involved at the level of individual animals.
V takem primeru države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da sta, v skladu z določbami, ki se uporabljajo za zadevni podporni ukrep, datum ali obdobje iz drugega pododstavka jasno opredeljena in znana upravičencu.“;
The procedures referred to in the first subparagraph may consist of a system according to which a beneficiary applies for support in respect of all animals which, at a date or during a period determined by the Member State, qualify for support on the basis of the data contained in the slaughter certificates or in other supporting documents.
člen 48 se spremeni:
In that case, Member States shall take the necessary measures to guarantee that in accordance with the provisions applicable to the support measure in question, the date or the period referred to in the second subparagraph are clearly identified and known to the beneficiary.’
odstavek 2 se spremeni:
Article 48 is amended as follows:
točka (c) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Paragraph 2 is amended as follows:
skladnost z merili za izbor, kadar se navedena merila uporabljajo;“;
point (c) is replaced by the following:
točka (e) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
compliance with the selection criteria, where those criteria apply;’
za stroške iz člena 67(1)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, brez prispevkov v naravi in amortizacije, preverjanje razumnosti predloženih stroškov.
point (e) is replaced by the following:
Stroški se ocenijo s primernim sistemom ocenjevanja, ki lahko vključuje referenčne stroške, primerjavo različnih ponudb ali odbor za ocenjevanje.
for costs referred to in Article 67(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, excluding contributions in kind and depreciation, a verification of the reasonableness of the costs submitted.
Za operacije s stopnjo podpore do 30 % ali operacije, ki prejemajo podporo v skladu s členom 35 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, se preverjanje razumnosti stroškov lahko opravi v fazi upravnih pregledov zahtevkov za plačilo.
The costs shall be evaluated using a suitable evaluation system, such as reference costs, a comparison of different offers or an evaluation committee.
Za operacije z upravičenimi stroški v višini do 5000 EUR se razumnost stroškov lahko določi s predlogom proračuna, ki ga je predhodno odobril organ upravljanja.“;
For operations with a support rate up to 30 % or for operations supported under Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, the verification of the reasonableness of the costs may be carried out at the stage of the administrative checks on payment claims.
v odstavku 3 se točki (a) in (b) nadomestita z naslednjim:
For operations with eligible costs up to EUR 5000, the reasonableness of the costs may be established by a draft budget agreed ex ante by the managing authority.’
zaključene operacije v primerjavi z operacijo, za katero je bila odobrena vloga za podporo;
In paragraph 3, points (a) and (b) are replaced by the following:
nastalih stroškov in izvedenih plačil, razen kadar se uporablja oblika ali metoda iz člena 67(1)(b), (c) ali (d) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.“;
the completed operation compared with the operation for which the application for support was granted;
doda se naslednji odstavek 6:
the costs incurred and the payments made, except where a form or method as referred to in Article 67(1)(b), (c) or (d) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 is applied.’
Kar zadeva finančne instrumente iz člena 38(1)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, se odstavki od 1 do 5 tega člena ne uporabljajo za prispevek k finančnemu instrumentu niti za podporo končnemu prejemniku.
The following paragraph 6 is added:
Vendar se člena 58 in 59 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 in člen 9 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 480/2014 uporabljajo.
As regards the financial instruments referred to in Article 38(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, paragraphs 1 to 5 of this Article shall neither apply to the contribution to the financial instrument nor to the support to the final recipient.
člen 50 se spremeni:
However, Articles 58 and 59 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 and Article 9 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 480/2014 shall apply.
odstavek 1 se spremeni:
Article 50 is amended as follows:
prvi pododstavek se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Paragraph 1 is amended as follows:
„Izdatki, v zvezi s katerimi se opravijo pregledi na kraju samem, predstavljajo vsaj 5 % izdatkov iz člena 46 in ki jih sofinancira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), ki se uveljavljajo vsako koledarsko leto pri plačilni agenciji in ne zadevajo operacij, za katere so bila uveljavljena le predplačila.“;
the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
doda se naslednji tretji pododstavek:
‘The expenditure covered by on-the-spot checks shall represent at least 5 % of the expenditure referred to in Article 46 and co-financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) which is claimed to the paying agency each calendar year and which does not concern operations for which only advance payments have been claimed.’
„Kar zadeva finančne instrumente, se le plačila končnim prejemnikom, ki so predmet pregleda na kraju samem, prištevajo v izdatke, zajete s pregledi na kraju samem, kot je navedeno v prvem pododstavku.“;
the following third subparagraph is added:
v odstavku 2 se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘As regards financial instruments, only the payments to the final recipients subject to on-the-spot checks shall be counted towards the expenditure covered by on-the-spot checks as referred to in the first subparagraph.’
„Samo pregledi, opravljeni do datuma, določenega za predložitev kontrolnih podatkov in kontrolne statistike v skladu s členom 9, se vštejejo v doseganje najmanjše stopnje iz odstavka 1.“;
In paragraph 2, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
člen 51 se spremeni:
‘Only checks carried out until the date foreseen for submission of the control data and control statistics according to Article 9 shall be counted towards the achievement of the minimum level referred to in paragraph 1.’
odstavek 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 51 is amended as follows:
S pregledi na kraju samem se preverja, ali je bila operacija izvedena v skladu z veljavnimi pravili, pri čemer so zajeta merila za upravičenost, zaveze in druge obveznosti v zvezi s pogoji za odobritev podpore, ki jih je mogoče preveriti ob obisku in še niso bili predmet upravnih pregledov.
Paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
S pregledi se zagotovi, da je operacija upravičena do podpore iz EKSRP.“;
On-the-spot checks shall verify that the operation has been implemented in accordance with the applicable rules and shall cover all the eligibility criteria, commitments and other obligations relating to the conditions for the granting of support, which can be checked at the time of the visit and have not been the subject of administrative checks.
doda se naslednji odstavek 5:
They shall ensure that the operation is eligible for an EAFRD support.’
Kar zadeva finančne instrumente iz člena 38(1)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, se odstavki od 1 do 4 tega člena ne uporabljajo za prispevek k finančnemu instrumentu niti za podporo končnemu prejemniku.
The following paragraph 5 is added:
Vendar se člena 58 in 59 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 in člen 9 Delegirane uredbe (EU) št. 480/2014 uporabljajo.“;
As regards the financial instruments referred to in Article 38(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, paragraphs 1 to 4 of this Article shall neither apply to the contribution to the financial instrument nor to the support to the final recipient.
členi od 54 do 59 se črtajo.
However, Articles 58 and 59 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 and Article 9 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 480/2014 shall apply.’
v členu 60 se doda naslednji odstavek 4:
Articles 54 to 59 are deleted.
Z odstopanjem od člena 48(2)(e) se v zvezi z operacijami, ki jih izvaja lokalna akcijska skupina in zajemajo skupino projektov v okviru skupne teme, preverjanje razumnosti stroškov lahko opravi v fazi upravnih pregledov zahtevkov za plačilo v zvezi z navedeno skupino projektov.“;
In Article 60, the following paragraph 4 is added:
člen 61 se spremeni:
By way of derogation from Article 48(2)(e), in respect of operations implemented by a local action group and covering a group of projects under a common theme, the verification of the reasonableness of costs may be carried out at the stage of the administrative checks on payment claims concerning that group of projects.’
v odstavku 1 se drugi stavek črta;
Article 61 is amended as follows:
odstavek 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
In paragraph 1, the second sentence is deleted;
Pristojni organ na podlagi upravnih pregledov in po potrebi obiskov na kraju samem pri posredniških finančnih institucijah in upravičencu zagotovi, da so plačila za posredniške finančne institucije v skladu z zakonodajo Unije in dogovorom, sklenjenim med pristojnim organom in posredniško finančno institucijo.“;
Paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
v členu 63 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
The competent authority shall ensure, via administrative checks and, if necessary, via in-situ visits to the intermediate financial institutions and to the beneficiary, that the payments to the intermediate financial institutions are in conformity with Union law and with the agreement concluded between the competent authority and the intermediate financial institution.’
Upravna kazen iz odstavka 1 se uporablja smiselno za neupravičene izdatke, ugotovljene med pregledi na kraju samem iz člena 49.“
In Article 63, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
Člen 2
The administrative penalty referred to in paragraph 1 shall be applied mutatis mutandis to non-eligible expenditure identified during on-the-spot checks referred to in Article 49.’
Ta uredba začne veljati sedmi dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Article 2
Uporablja se za vloge za podporo ali zahtevke za plačilo, ki se nanašajo na leta zahtevkov ali premijska obdobja od 1. januarja 2018.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Vendar se točka 1 člena 1 uporablja za zahtevke za plačilo na žival, ki se nanašajo na leta zahtevkov od 1. januarja 2016.
It shall apply to applications for support or payment claims relating to claim years or premium periods starting as from 1 January 2018.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
However, point 1 of Article 1 shall apply to livestock payment claims relating to claim years starting as from 1 January 2016.
V Bruslju, 10. julija 2017
Done at Brussels, 10 July 2017.
Predsednik
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the integrated administration and control system, rural development measures and cross compliance (OJ L 227, 31.7.2014, p. 69).
Uredba (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evropskem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo, o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 320).
Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 487).
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 480/2014 z dne 3. marca 2014 o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evropskem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo ter o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo (UL L 138, 13.5.2014, str. 5).
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 320).
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 640/2014 z dne 11. marca 2014 o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema, pogojev za zavrnitev ali ukinitev plačil in za upravne kazni, ki se uporabljajo za neposredna plačila, podporo za razvoj podeželja in navzkrižno skladnost (UL L 181, 20.6.2014, str. 48).