natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Seasonal space-heating energy efficiency, ηs, for electric local space heaters
Sezonska energijska učinkovitost pri ogrevanju prostorov (ηs) za lokalne grelnike prostorov z zgorevanjem na površini in lokalne cevne grelnike prostorov
The determined value shall not be lower than the declared value at the nominal heat output of the unit.
Emisije dušikovih oksidov za lokalne gospodinjske grelnike prostorov na tekoče in plinasto gorivo, lokalne grelnike prostorov z zgorevanjem na površini in lokalne cevne grelnike prostorov
Seasonal space-heating energy efficiency, ηs, for liquid fuel and gaseous fuel domestic local space heaters
PRILOGA XXIV
Seasonal space-heating energy efficiency, ηs, for luminous and tube local space heaters
Spremembe Priloge IV k Uredbi (EU) 2015/1189
Emissions of nitrogen oxides for gaseous and liquid fuel domestic local space heaters and luminous and tube local space heaters
so ugotovljene vrednosti (vrednosti ustreznih parametrov, kot se izmerijo pri preskušanju, in vrednosti, izračunane na podlagi teh meritev), ko organi držav članic preskušajo enoto modela, v skladu z zadevnimi dovoljenimi odstopanji pri preverjanjih, kot so opredeljena v preglednici 2.
ANNEX XXIV
Ugotovljena vrednost ni nižja od deklarirane vrednosti za več kot 4 %.
Amendments to Annex IV to Regulation (EU) 2015/1189
Ugotovljena vrednost ne presega deklarirane vrednosti za več kot 9 mg/m3.
when the Member State authorities test the unit of the model, the determined values (the values of the relevant parameters as measured in testing and the values calculated from these measurements) comply with the respective verification tolerances as given in Table 2.
Ugotovljena vrednost ne presega deklarirane vrednosti za več kot 7 mg/m3.
The determined value shall not be lower than the declared value by more than 4 %.
Ugotovljena vrednost ne presega deklarirane vrednosti za več kot 30 mg/m3.
The determined value shall not exceed the declared value by more than 9 mg/m3.
Ugotovljena vrednost ne presega deklarirane vrednosti za več kot 30 mg/m3.“
The determined value shall not exceed the declared value by more than 7 mg/m3.
PRILOGA XXV
The determined value shall not exceed the declared value by more than 30 mg/m3.
Spremembe Priloge IV k Uredbi (EU) 2016/2281
The determined value shall not exceed the declared value by more than 30 mg/m3.’
so ugotovljene vrednosti (vrednosti ustreznih parametrov, kot se izmerijo pri preskušanju, in vrednosti, izračunane na podlagi teh meritev), ko organi držav članic preskušajo enoto modela, v skladu z zadevnimi dovoljenimi odstopanji pri preverjanjih, kot so opredeljena v tabeli 30.
ANNEX XXV
Če rezultati iz točk 2(a) ali (b) niso doseženi, se šteje, da model in drugi modeli, pri katerih so bile informacije, vključene v tehnično dokumentacijo, pridobljene na enaki podlagi, niso skladni s to uredbo.
Amendments to Annex IV to Regulation (EU) 2016/2281
Če rezultati iz točke 2(c) niso doseženi, se za izdelke za toplozračno ogrevanje, izdelke za hlajenje, visokotemperaturne procesne ohlajevalnike ali ventilatorske konvektorje z nazivno zmogljivostjo ogrevanja, hlajenja ali hladilno zmogljivostjo ≥ 70 kW ali izdelke, ki se jih proizvede manj kot pet na leto, šteje, da model in drugi modeli, pri katerih so bile informacije, vključene v tehnično dokumentacijo, pridobljene na enaki podlagi, niso skladni s to uredbo.
when the Member State authorities test the unit of the model, the determined values (the values of the relevant parameters as measured in testing and the values calculated from these measurements) comply with the respective verification tolerances as given in Table 30.
Če rezultati iz točke 2(c) niso doseženi, za izdelke za toplozračno ogrevanje, izdelke za hlajenje, visokotemperaturne procesne ohlajevalnike ali ventilatorske konvektorje z nazivno zmogljivostjo ogrevanja, hlajenja ali hladilno zmogljivostjo < 70 kW ali izdelke, ki se jih proizvede pet ali več na leto, organi držav članic izberejo tri dodatne enote istega modela za preskušanje.
If the results referred to in point 2(a) or (b) are not achieved, the model and any other model where the information included in the technical documentation was obtained on the same basis shall be considered not to comply with this Regulation.
Šteje se, da model izpolnjuje veljavne zahteve, če je za te tri enote aritmetična sredina ugotovljenih vrednosti v skladu z zadevnimi dovoljenimi odstopanji pri preverjanjih, opredeljenimi v tabeli 30.
For air heating product, cooling product, high temperature process chiller or fan coil unit models with a rated heating, cooling or refrigeration capacity ≥ 70 kW or that are produced in lower quantities than 5 per year, if the result referred to in point 2(c) is not achieved, the model and any other model where the information included in the technical documentation was obtained on the same basis shall be considered not to comply with this Regulation.
Če rezultat iz točke 6 ni dosežen, se šteje, da model in drugi modeli, pri katerih so bile informacije, vključene v tehnično dokumentacijo, pridobljene na enaki podlagi, niso skladni s to uredbo.
For air heating product, cooling product, high temperature process chiller or fan coil unit models with a rated heating, cooling or refrigeration capacity < 70 kW or that are produced in quantities of 5 or more per year, if the result referred to in point 2(c) is not achieved, the Member State authorities shall select three additional units of the same model for testing.
Organi držav članic predložijo vse ustrezne informacije organom drugih držav članic in Komisiji nemudoma po sprejetju sklepa o neskladnosti modela v skladu s točkami 3, 4 in 7.
The model shall be considered to comply with the applicable requirements if, for these three units, the arithmetical mean of the determined values complies with the respective verification tolerances given in Table 30.
Organi držav članic uporabljajo samo dovoljena odstopanja pri preverjanjih, opredeljena v tabeli 30, in za zahteve iz te priloge samo postopek, opisan v točkah 1 do 8.
If the result referred to in point 6 is not achieved, the model and any other model where the information included in the technical documentation was obtained on the same basis shall be considered not to comply with this Regulation.
Tabela 30
The Member State authorities shall provide all relevant information to the authorities of the other Member States and to the Commission without delay after a decision being taken on the non-compliance of the model according to points 3, 4 and 7.
Sezonska energijska učinkovitost pri ogrevanju prostorov (ηs,h) za izdelke za toplozračno ogrevanje pri nazivni zmogljivosti ogrevanja enote
The Member State authorities shall only apply the verification tolerances that are set out in Table 30 and shall only use the procedure described in points 1 to 8 for the requirements referred to in this Annex.
Sezonska energijska učinkovitost pri hlajenju prostorov (ηs,c) za izdelke za hlajenje pri nazivni zmogljivosti hlajenja enote
Table 30
Nivo zvokovne moči (LWA) za izdelke za toplozračno ogrevanje in izdelke za hlajenje
Seasonal space heating energy efficiency (ηs,h) for air heating products at the rated heating capacity of the unit
Ugotovljena vrednost ne presega deklarirane vrednosti za več kot 1,5 dB.
Seasonal space cooling energy efficiency (ηs,c) for cooling products at the rated cooling capacity of the unit
Emisije dušikovih oksidov, izražene v dušikovem dioksidu, za izdelke za toplozračno ogrevanje in izdelke za hlajenje na gorivo
Sound power level (LWA) for air heating products and cooling products
Razmerje sezonske energijske učinkovitosti (SEPR) visokotemperaturnih procesnih ohlajevalnikov pri nazivni hladilni zmogljivosti enote
The determined value shall not exceed the declared value by more than 1,5 dB.
Nazivno razmerje energijske učinkovitosti (EERA) visokotemperaturnih procesnih ohlajevalnikov pri nazivni hladilni zmogljivosti
Emissions of nitrogen oxides for fuel fired air heating products and cooling products expressed in nitrogen dioxide
Organi držav članic pri preverjanju skladnosti modela izdelka z zahtevami iz te uredbe v skladu s členom 3(2) Direktive 2009/125/ES za zahteve iz te priloge uporabljajo naslednji postopek: Korake iz točk 2(a), 2(b) in 3 v nadaljevanju uporabljajo tudi med postopkom preverjanja iz dela B te priloge.
correcting the German language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II)
o popravku nemške jezikovne različice Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/35 o dopolnitvi Direktive 2009/138/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II)
Having regard to Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) [1] and in particular Article 31(4), Article 35(9), Article 50(1)(a), Article 50(1)(b), Article 50(2)(a), Article 50(2)(b), Article 56, Article 92(1), Article 92(1a), Article 97(1), Article 109a(5), Article 111(1)(a) to (c), Article 111(1)(f), Article 111(1)(h), Article 111(1)(k), Article 111(1)(l), Article 111(1)(o), Article 211(2), Article 244(4) and Article 244(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/138/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II) [1] ter zlasti člena 31(4), člena 35(9), člena 50(1)(a) in (b), člena 50(2)(a) in (b), člena 56, člena 92(1) in (1a), člena 97(1), člena 109a(5), člena 111(1)(a) do (c), (f), (h), (k), (l) in (o), člena 211(2) ter člena 244(4) in (5) Uredbe,
The German language version of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 [2] contains an error in Article 71(1)(l)(i) and in Article 73(1)(g)(i) concerning the legal or contractual arrangements for the features determining the classification of basic own funds items.
Nemška jezikovna različica Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/35 [2] vsebuje napako v členu 71(1)(l)(i) in členu 73(1)(g)(i) v zvezi s pravnimi ali pogodbenimi ureditvami lastnosti, ki določajo razvrstitev postavk osnovnih lastnih sredstev.
The German language version of that Regulation contains erroneous cross-references in Article 73(3).
Nemška jezikovna različica navedene uredbe vsebuje napačne navzkrižne sklice v členu 73(3).
Article 73(3) lays down in which points of Article 73(1), references to the Solvency Capital Requirement shall be read as references to the Minimum Capital Requirement where non-compliance with the Minimum Capital Requirement occurs before non-compliance with the Solvency Capital Requirement.
Člen 73(3) določa, pri katerih točkah člena 73(1) sklicevanje na zahtevani solventnostni kapital pomenijo sklicevanje na zahtevani minimalni kapital, kadar do neskladnosti z zahtevanim minimalnim kapitalom pride pred neskladnostjo z zahtevanim solventnostnim kapitalom.
The German language version of that Regulation, more precisely in Article 104(3), erroneously assigns a minimum period to duri. referred to in Article 104(1)(e) instead of assigning a minimum period to duri. referred to in Article 104(2).
V nemški jezikovni različici navedene uredbe, natančneje v členu 104(3), je napačno določeno najkrajše obdobje za duri. iz člena 104(1)(e), namesto da bi bilo določeno najkrajše obdobje za duri. iz člena 104(2).
The German language version of that Regulation, more precisely in the first subparagraph of Article 186(2), erroneously sets out a risk factor gi for market risk concentration to single names exposures to an insurance or reinsurance undertaking for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available, whereas this risk factor should be assigned where no credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available.
V nemški jezikovni različici navedene uredbe, natančneje v prvem pododstavku člena 186(2), se faktor tveganja gi za koncentracijo tržnega tveganja napačno dodeli posameznim izpostavljenostim do zavarovalnice ali pozavarovalnice, za katere je bonitetna ocena imenovane ECAI na voljo, medtem ko bi se ta faktor tveganja moral dodeliti, kadar bonitetna ocena imenovane ECAI ni na voljo.
In the German language version of that Regulation, more precisely in the introductory wording of Article 219(1)(e) the scope of the provision was erroneously restricted since the word ‘including’ was not translated.
V nemški jezikovni različici navedene uredbe, natančneje v uvodnem besedilu člena 219(1)(e), je bilo področje uporabe določbe napačno omejeno, ker beseda „vključno“ ni bila prevedena.
The German language version of that Regulation, more precisely in Article 297(2)(f), omits the word ‘impact’ in the phrase ‘the impact of any undertaking-specific parameters’.
V nemški jezikovni različici navedene uredbe, natančneje v členu 297(2)(f), je bila izpuščena beseda „učinek“ v zvezi „učinek kakršnih koli parametrov, specifičnih za posamezno podjetje“.
In Article 303 of the German language version, the translation of the terms ‘date of application’ are erroneously translated with the German wording corresponding to ‘date of entry into force’.
V členu 303 nemške jezikovne različice je izraz „začetek uporabe“ napačno preveden z nemškim izrazom za „začetek veljavnosti“.
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 should therefore be corrected accordingly.
Delegirano uredbo (EU) 2015/35 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno popraviti.
The need to have a same level playing field for all insurance and reinsurance undertakings, the overriding interests of the integrity of the internal market as well as legal certainty require that this Delegated Regulation be applied with effect from 18 January 2015, the date of entry into force of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35,
Potreba po enakih pogojih za vse zavarovalnice in pozavarovalnice, višji interesi za celovitost notranjega trga ter pravna varnost zahtevajo, da se ta delegirana uredba uporablja z učinkom od 18. januarja 2015, ki je datum začetka veljavnosti Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/35 –
Concerns only the German language version.
Zadeva le nemško jezikovno različico.
It shall apply with effect from 18 January 2015.
Uporablja se z učinkom od 18. januarja 2015.
Council Regulation (EU) 2016/2285
Uredba Sveta (EU) 2016/2285
fixing for 2017 and 2018 the fishing opportunities for Union fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks and amending Council Regulation (EU) 2016/72
o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti za ribiška plovila Unije za določene staleže globokomorskih rib za leti 2017 in 2018 in o spremembi Uredbe (EU) 2016/72
Fishing opportunities should be distributed among Member States in such a way as to assure each Member State relative stability of fishing activities for each stock or fishery and having due regard to the objectives of the common fisheries policy established by Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Ribolovne možnosti bi bilo treba med države članice razdeliti tako, da se vsaki državi članici zagotovi sorazmerna stabilnost ribolovnih dejavnosti za vsak stalež ali ribolov, in ob upoštevanju ciljev skupne ribiške politike iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013.
The fishing opportunities for deep-sea species as defined in point (a) of Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002 [2] are decided on a biennial basis.
Ribolovne možnosti za globokomorske vrste, kot so opredeljene v točki (a) člena 2 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2347/2002 [2], se določijo vsaki dve leti.
The total allowable catches (‘TACs’) should be established on the basis of available scientific advice, taking into account biological and socioeconomic aspects whilst ensuring fair treatment between fishing sectors, as well as in the light of the opinions expressed during the consultation of stakeholders, and in particular the advisory councils concerned.
Celotne dovoljene ulove (TAC) bi bilo treba določiti na podlagi razpoložljivega znanstvenega mnenja ter ob upoštevanju bioloških in družbenogospodarskih vidikov, pri čemer bi bilo treba zagotoviti pošteno obravnavo med ribiškimi sektorji, ter ob upoštevanju mnenj, izraženih med posvetovanjem z deležniki, zlasti zadevnih svetovalnih svetov.
Fishing opportunities should be in accordance with international agreements and principles, such as the 1995 United Nations agreement concerning the conservation and management of straddling stocks and highly migratory fish stocks [3], and the detailed management principles laid down in the 2008 International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in the High Seas of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, according to which, in particular, a regulator should be more cautious when information is uncertain, unreliable or inadequate.
Ribolovne možnosti bi morale biti skladne z mednarodnimi sporazumi in načeli, kot je Sporazum Združenih narodov glede ohranjanja in upravljanja čezconskih staležev rib in izrazito selivskih staležev rib iz leta 1995 [3], ter s podrobnimi načeli upravljanja iz mednarodnih smernic Organizacije Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo za upravljanje globokomorskega ribolova na odprtih morjih iz leta 2008, v skladu s katerimi mora biti upravni organ zlasti previdnejši, če so informacije negotove, nezanesljive ali neustrezne.
The absence of adequate scientific information should not be used as a reason for postponing or failing to take conservation and management measures.
Pomanjkanje ustreznih znanstvenih informacij ne bi smelo biti razlog za odlaganje ali nesprejetje ukrepov ohranjanja in upravljanja.
The latest scientific advice from the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) and from STECF indicates that most deep-sea stocks are still harvested unsustainably and that fishing opportunities for those stocks, in order to assure their sustainability, should be further reduced until the evolution of the stocks shows a positive trend.
V najnovejša znanstvena mnenja Mednarodnega sveta za raziskovanje morja (ICES) in STECF razkrivajo, da se večina globokomorskih staležev še vedno ne lovi trajnostno, pri čemer bi bilo treba ribolovne možnosti za te staleže zaradi zagotovitve njihove trajnosti dodatno zmanjšati, dokler se ne bi pokazal pozitiven trend razvoja staležev.
In view of the ICES advice, it is appropriate for the TAC for red seabream in the North-Western waters to be made a by-catch-only TAC.
Skladno s priporočilom ICES je primerno, da je TAC za okatega ribona v severozahodnih vodah le prilovni TAC.
Significant catches of red seabream are taken from the relevant Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic (CECAF) and General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) areas, which border on ICES subarea IX.
Pomembni ulovi okatega ribona so določeni za zadevna območja Odbora za ribištvo za vzhodni srednji Atlantik (CECAF) in Generalne komisije za ribištvo v Sredozemlju (GFCM), ki mejijo na podobmočje ICES IX.
Given that ICES data for those adjacent areas are incomplete, the scope of the TAC should remain limited to ICES subarea IX.
Ker so podatki ICES za ta mejna območja nepopolni, bi moral biti obseg TAC še naprej omejen na podobmočje ICES IX.
Nevertheless, with a view to preparing future management decisions, provisions should be made for data reporting for those adjacent areas.
Vendar bi bilo treba zaradi priprave prihodnjih odločitev glede upravljanja določiti sporočanje podatkov za ta mejna območja.
In the past, TACs have been established for orange roughy (those TACs have been set at zero since 2010).
ICES ugotavlja, da se usmerjeni ribolov Unije na oranžno sluzoglavko ni izvajal v severovzhodnem Atlantiku od leta 2010.
It is appropriate for the fishing, retaining on board, transhipping and landing of that species to be prohibited, as the stock is depleted and is not recovering.
Glede na mnenje ICES so omejena opazovanja na krovu pokazala, da je delež čebulastookega repaka v prijavljenem ulovu okroglonosega repaka manjši od 1 %.
ICES notes that there have been no directed Union fisheries for orange roughy in the North-East Atlantic since 2010.
Na podlagi tega ICES priporoča, da se prepove usmerjeni ribolov čebulastookega repaka, vsi prilovi pa prištejejo k TAC za okroglonosega repaka, da bi se tako čim bolj zmanjšalo morebitno napačno poročanje o vrstah.
According to the advice provided by ICES, limited on-board observations show that the percentage of roughhead grenadier has been less than 1 % of the reported catches of roundnose grenadier.
Kot je navedel ICES, so na območjih, kjer je ribolov čebulastookega repaka dovoljen, razlike med relativnimi deleži okroglonosega in čebulastookega repaka, prijavljenimi v uradnih iztovarjanjih, ter nadzorovanimi ulovi in znanstvenimi raziskavami precejšnje, celo gromozanske (več kot desetkratne).
On the basis of those considerations, ICES advises that there should be no directed fisheries for roughhead grenadier and that by-catches should be counted against the TAC for roundnose grenadier in order to minimise the potential for species misreporting.
Za to vrsto je na voljo zelo malo podatkov in pri nekaterih podatkih iz prijavljenega iztovora gre po mnenju ICES pravzaprav za napačno poročanje o vrstah.
ICES indicates that there are considerable differences, of more than an order of magnitude (more than ten times), between the relative proportions of roundnose and roughhead grenadier reported in the official landings and the observed catches and scientific surveys in the areas where the fishery for roughhead grenadier currently occurs.
Zato ni mogoče sestaviti točne pretekle slike ulova okroglonosega repaka.
There is very limited data available for this species, and some of the reported landing data are considered by ICES to be species misreporting.
V skladu z znanstvenim mnenjem bi bilo zato treba vsak prilov čebulastookega repaka omejiti na 1 % kvote vsake države članice za okroglonosega repaka in ga v to kvoto tudi všteti.
As a consequence, it is not possible to establish an accurate historical record of catches of roughhead grenadier.
ICES priporoča, da se usmerjeni ulov globokomorskih morskih psov določi na nič.
Therefore, any by-catches for roughhead grenadier should be limited to 1 % of each Member State's quota of roundnose grenadier and counted against that quota, in line with the scientific advice.
ICES pa tudi navaja, da so trenutno veljavne restriktivne omejitve ulova povzročile napačno poročanje o neizbežnem prilovu globokomorskega morskega psa.
ICES advises that directed catches of deep-sea sharks should be set at zero.
Zlasti se pri usmerjenem malem globokomorskem ribolovu črnega morskega meča s parangalom neizbežno prilovijo globokomorski morski psi, ki se jih trenutno zavrže mrtve.
However, ICES also indicates that the currently applicable restrictive catch limits lead to misreporting of unavoidable by-catches of deep-sea sharks.
Ob upoštevanju teh dejstev, bi morali, da bi zbrali znanstvene informacije o globokomorskih morskih psih, za leti 2017 in 2018 poskusno uvesti restriktivni dovoljeni prilov, pri tem pa dovoliti omejena iztovarjanja neizogibnega prilova globokomorskih morskih psov pri usmerjenem malem globokomorskem ribolovu črnega morskega meča s parangali.
In particular, directed artisanal deep-sea fisheries for black scabbardfish that use longlines have unavoidable by-catches of deep-sea sharks, which are currently discarded dead.
Parangali veljajo za selektivno ribolovno orodje pri tem ribolovu.
In view of those facts, and in order to collect scientific information on deep-sea sharks, a restrictive by-catch allowance for 2017 and 2018 should be introduced on a trial basis by permitting limited landings of unavoidable by-catches of deep-sea sharks in directed artisanal deep-sea fisheries for black scabbardfish that use longlines.
Zadevne države članice bi morale za ribolov črnega morskega meča oblikovati ukrepe regionalnega upravljanja in vzpostaviti posebne ukrepe za zbiranje podatkov o globokomorskih morskih psih, da bi zagotovili temeljito spremljanje staležev.