natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Albemarle Europe SPRL (BE)
SIGMA-ALDRICH COMPANY LTD.
LABORATORIOS MIRET S.A.
(UK)
(ES)
SPEX CertiPrep LTD.
Ltd.
PRILOGA XI
ANNEX IX
06073 Solomeo - Corciano (PG)
(BE)
INTERGEO LTD.
DIVERCHIM SA (FR)
Avenue de la République
Labmix24 GmbH (DE)
Technologies Ltd.
LGC Standards GmbH (DE)
Butterworth Laboratories Ltd.
Ludwig-Maximilians-University (DE)
Hovione FarmaCiencia S.A.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (UK)
SPEX CertiPrep LTD.
SIGMA ALDRICH CHIMIE sarl (FR)
Sterling S.p.A.
SPEX CertiPrep LTD (UK)
BASF Agri-Production SAS (FR)
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2334
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/2334
of 14 December 2017
z dne 14. decembra 2017
postponing the expiry date of approval of creosote for use in biocidal products of product-type 8
o odlogu datuma izteka odobritve kreozota za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih 8. vrste proizvodov
After consulting the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products,
po posvetovanju s Stalnim odborom za biocidne pripravke,
The active substance creosote was included into Annex I to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] for use in biocidal products for product-type 8, and pursuant to Article 86 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 is therefore considered approved under that Regulation subject to the specifications and conditions set out in Annex I to that Directive.
Aktivna snov kreozot je bila vključena v Prilogo I k Direktivi 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih 8. vrste proizvodov in se zato v skladu s členom 86 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 šteje za odobreno v skladu z navedeno uredbo ob upoštevanju specifikacij in pogojev iz Priloge I k navedeni direktivi.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, an application has been submitted for the renewal of the approval of this active substance on 27 October 2016.
V skladu s členom 14(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 je omogočeno 365-dnevno obdobje za izvedbo popolne ocene.
The United Kingdom, as the evaluating competent authority, has informed the Commission services on 14 July 2017 that a full evaluation will have to be performed.
Med to oceno lahko pristojni ocenjevalni organ v skladu s členom 8(2) navedene uredbe po potrebi od vlagatelja zahteva, da predloži dovolj podatkov za izvedbo ocene.
A 365-day period is allowed to perform a full evaluation pursuant to Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
V takem primeru se 365-dnevno obdobje prekine za obdobje, ki skupno ne presega 180 dni, razen če je to upravičeno zaradi narave zahtevanih podatkov ali izrednih okoliščin.
During this evaluation, the evaluating competent authority may, as appropriate, request the applicant to provide sufficient data to carry out the evaluation, in accordance with Article 8(2) of that Regulation.
Evropska agencija za kemikalije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) v 270 dneh po prejemu priporočil pristojnega ocenjevalnega organa v skladu s členom 14(3) navedene uredbe pripravi in Komisiji predloži mnenje o podaljšanju odobritve aktivne snovi.
In such case, the 365-day period is suspended for a period that may not exceed 180 days in total unless it is justified by the nature of the data requested or by exceptional circumstances.
Poleg tega je kreozot razvrščen kot rakotvorna snov kategorije 1B in izpolnjuje merila za obstojno, bioakumulativno in strupeno snov (snov PBT) ali zelo obstojno in zelo bioakumulativno snov (snov vPvB) (PBT ali vPvB) v skladu s Prilogo XIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] ter izpolnjuje merila za izključitev iz točk (a) in (e) člena 5(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
Within 270 days of receipt of a recommendation from the evaluating competent authority, the European Chemicals Agency (‘the Agency’) is to prepare and submit to the Commission an opinion on renewal of the approval of the active substance in accordance with Article 14(3) of that Regulation.
Zato bo potrebno nadaljnje preverjanje za opredelitev, ali je izpolnjen vsaj eden od pogojev iz prvega pododstavka člena 5(2) navedene uredbe in ali je zato mogoče podaljšati odobritev kreozota.
In addition, as creosote is classified as carcinogen category 1B and meets the criteria for being a persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substance (PBT substance), or a very persistent and very bioaccumulative substance (vPvB substances) (PBT or vPvB) according to Annex XIII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], it meets the exclusion criteria set out in points (a) and (e) of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Zato bo iz razlogov, na katere vlagatelj nima vpliva, odobritev kreozota verjetno potekla pred sprejetjem odločitve o njenem podaljšanju.
Further examination will therefore be necessary to define whether at least one of the conditions of the first subparagraph of Article 5(2) of that Regulation is fulfilled, and whether the approval of creosote may therefore be renewed.
Zato je primerno datum izteka odobritve kreozota odložiti za obdobje, ki je potrebno, da se omogoči preverjanje vloge.
Consequently, for reasons beyond the control of the applicant, the approval of creosote is likely to expire before a decision has been taken on its renewal.
Glede na obdobja, ki so bila na voljo pristojnemu ocenjevalnemu organu za oceno ter Agenciji za pripravo in predložitev mnenja, ter glede na potrebno obdobje za odločitev, ali je izpolnjen vsaj eden od pogojev iz prvega pododstavka člena 5(2) navedene uredbe in ali je zato mogoče podaljšati odobritev kreozota, je primerno datum izteka odobritve kreozota odložiti do 31. oktobra 2020.
It is therefore appropriate to postpone the expiry date of approval of creosote for a period of time sufficient to enable the examination of the application.
Z izjemo datuma izteka odobritve bi moral kreozot ostati odobren v skladu s specifikacijami in pogoji, navedenimi v Prilogi I k Direktivi 98/8/ES –
Considering the periods of time allowed for the evaluation by the evaluating competent authority and for the preparation and submission of the opinion by the Agency, and the period of time necessary to decide if at least one of the conditions of the first subparagraph of Article 5(2) of that Regulation is fulfilled and whether the approval of creosote may therefore be renewed, it is appropriate to postpone the expiry date of approval of creosote to 31 October 2020.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Except for the expiry date of the approval, creosote should remain approved subject to the specifications and conditions set out in Annex I to Directive 98/8/EC,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Datuma izteka odobritve kreozota za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih 8. vrste proizvodov se odloži do 31. oktobra 2020.
The expiry date of approval of creosote for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 is postponed to 31 October 2020.
Ta sklep začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Article 2
V Bruslju, 14. decembra 2017
Done at Brussels, 14 December 2017.
Predsednik
OJ L 167, 27.6.2012, p. 1.
Uredba (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH), o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije ter spremembi Direktive 1999/45/ES ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1488/94 ter Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS in direktiv Komisije 91/155/EGS, 93/67/EGS, 93/105/ES in 2000/21/ES (UL L 396, 30.12.2006, str. 1).
Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (OJ L 123, 24.4.1998, p. 1).
Odobritev kreozota poteče 30. aprila 2018.
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
V skladu s členom 13(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 je bila 27. oktobra 2016 vložena vloga za podaljšanje odobritve te aktivne snovi.
Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2336
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/2336
SA.21877 (C 24/2007), SA.27585 (2012/C) and SA.31149 (2012/C) — Germany Alleged State aid to Flughafen Lübeck GmbH, Infratil Limited, Ryanair and other airlines using the airport
SA.21877 (C 24/2007), SA.27585 (2012/C) in SA.31149 (2012/C) – Nemčija Domnevna državna pomoč družbam Flughafen Lübeck GmbH, Infratil Limited, Ryanair in drugim letalskim prevoznikom, ki uporabljajo letališče
(notified under document C(2017) 602)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2017) 602)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedeno določbo [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision cited above [2] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedeno določbo [2], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
PROCEDURE SA.21877
POSTOPEK SA.21877
Further information was asked by letter dated 22 March 2006, to which Germany replied on 12 June 2006.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 2. maja 2007 zavrnila prošnjo.
Meetings between the Commission services, Infratil, the majority owner of the company operating the airport, and the Hanseatic City of Lübeck (‘Hansestadt Lübeck’) took place on 14 October and 4 December 2006.
Dne 24. aprila 2007 je Nemčija poslala Komisiji dodatne pripombe.
Subsequent to these meetings, Infratil provided additional information by emails and faxes dated 16 and 31 October 2006, 6 November 2006 and 4, 6 and 21 December 2006.
Nemčija in službe Komisije so se sestale 21. junija 2007.
By letter dated 18 January 2007, Germany asked the Commission to suspend the preliminary investigation of the file.
Komisija je v odgovoru z dne 8. avgusta 2008 potrdila, da je pooblastila družbo Ecorys v tej zadevi.
In a letter of 2 May 2007, the Commission denied the request.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 28. marca 2011 od Nemčije zahtevala dodatne podatke.
(7) The 2007 Opening decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5] on 29 November 2007.
Nemčija je končno poslala pripombe Komisiji 8. septembra 2011.
Germany replied to those comments on 17 April 2008.
POSTOPKA SA.27585 IN SA.31149
The Commission's independent consultant Ecorys requested information from Germany on 24 July 2008 in order to compile a report on the matter.
Dne 28. januarja 2009 je organizacija SGF poslala pritožbo glede zadeve SA.21877.
The Commission replied on 8 August 2008, confirming that the Commission's competences are extended to Ecorys in this matter.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 5. februarja 2009 od Nemčije zahtevala podatke o tiskovnih poročilih o letališču Lübeck.
Consequently, the requested information was obtained on 18 September 2008.
Nemčija je odgovorila z dopisoma z dne 5. marca 2009 in 12. marca 2009.
(10) On 16 April 2009, the Commission requested further information from Germany.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 16. aprila 2009 od Nemčije zahtevala dodatne podatke.
Further information was requested by the Commission on 29 October 2009, which was submitted by Germany on 16 December 2009.
Ta pritožba je bila evidentirana pod številko primera državne pomoči CP 162/2010 (SA.31149).
(11) On 17 October 2010, the Commission received information from Air Berlin.
V dopisu z dne 7. julija 2010 je Komisija to pritožbo poslala Nemčiji in od nje zahtevala podatke.
(13) On 8 April 2011, the Commission sent a questionnaire to Ryanair.
Komisija je poslala nemško različico navedb Nemčiji z dopisom z dne 8. avgusta 2011.
The Commission forwarded these submissions on 18 July 2011 to Germany, inviting for comments until 18 August 2011.
Komisija je 7. februarja 2012 od družbe Ryanair zahtevala dodatne podatke glede študije družbe Oxera.
On 7 February 2012, the Commission requested further information from Ryanair concerning the Oxera study, which was submitted by Ryanair on 4 July 2011.
Komisija je to pojasnilo predložila 17. februarja 2012.
These comments were sent to Germany by the Commission on 27 June 2012.
Dne 10. septembra 2012 je SGF poslala pripombe Komisiji.
Germany commented on Ryanair's submissions in a letter from 10 September 2012.
Družba Ryanair je posredovala svoje pripombe Komisiji 24. septembra 2012, vključno s poročilom družbe Oxera.
(14) The final report by Ecorys from 29 March 2011 was sent to Germany on 29 June 2011, inviting Germany to comment.
Istega dne je družba Ryanair svojim navedbam dodala več poročil, ki jih je pripravila družba Oxera.
A translation of the report was sent to Germany on 24 August 2011, inviting Germany to comment until 26 September 2011.
Komisija je 3. maja 2014 predložila Nemčiji nezaupne različice poročil družbe Oxera in jo pozvala k predložitvi pripomb.
Germany sent its comments on 10 October 2011.
Družba Ryanair je predložila dodatne podatke 15. maja 2013, 17. januarja 2014 in 31. januarja 2014.
On 30 June 2011, Germany sent the second part of the information requested by the Commission.
Z dopisom z dne 11. februarja 2013 je Komisija pozvala Nemčijo, naj predloži vse pogodbe v zvezi s privatizacijo letališča Lübeck v 20 dneh.
Germany replied to the Commission's letter of 15 June 2011 on 29 June 2011.
Takšno razkritje Komisiji je bilo zavrnjeno z dopisom z dne 28. februarja 2014, ker privatizacija letališča Lübeck ni bila del tedanjega postopka.
On 5 July 2011, the Commission asked Germany to send missing information.
Po posvetovanjih med Komisijo in Nemčijo je Nemčija v dopisu z dne 13. marca 2014 poslala podrobnosti o privatizaciji letališča Lübeck.
On 15 July 2011, Germany sent the missing information.
Komisija je 24. februarja 2013 in 17. marca 2014 obvestila Nemčijo o uvedbi smernic za letalski sektor iz leta 2014 in pomenu le-teh za sedanje postopke ter pozvala Nemčijo k predložitvi pripomb.
On 4 July 2011, Ryanair sent comments to the Commission, which were forwarded to Germany on 8 August 2011.
Komisija je leta 2014 združila postopke SA.21877, SA.27585 in SA.31149.
Germany commented on these submissions on 8 October 2011.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 30. septembra 2014 od Nemčije zahtevala dodatne podatke.
The Commission requested further information from Germany on 20 February 2012.
Komisija je prejela navedbe družbe Ryanair po elektronski pošti dne 26. januarja 2015, 9. februarja 2015 in 27. februarja 2015.
An extension of the deadline to submit the information until 17 April 2012 was requested by Germany on 19 March 2012.
Družba Air Berlin je 30. januarja 2015 izrazila zanimanje za sklep Komisije o domnevni državni pomoči družbi Ryanair.
This was granted by the Commission on 21 March 2012.
V dopisu z dne 23. marca 2015 je Komisija predložila nadaljnje pripombe tretjih oseb in pozvala Nemčijo k predložitvi pripomb.
In a letter dating 7 May 2012, Germany pointed out procedural errors on the Commission's side and refused the submission of further information.
Komisija je 23. junija 2015 zastavila Nemčiji dodatna vprašanja.
In a letter from 10 April 2013, Ryanair sent a report on Oxera's approach to the Market Economy Operator Principle (‘MEO principle’) to the Commission.
Družba Ryanair je Komisiji poslala obrazložitveno sporočilo družbe Oxera 3. julija 2015.
Further submissions by Ryanair were sent to the Commission on 20 December 2013.
Odgovore je prejela 10. septembra 2015.
(19) In a letter from 24 February 2014, the Commission invited Ryanair to comment on the application of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines [11].
Družba Ryanair je Komisiji 30. novembra 2015 predložila še eno sporočilo družbe Oxera, ki obravnava ocene sporazumov med letališčem in letalskim prevoznikom z vidika načela udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu v okviru splošne donosnosti letališča.
On 21 March 2014, the Commission invited Infratil to comment on the 2014 Aviation Guidelines.
Mesto Lübeck je Nemčiji predložilo dodatne informacije 20. januarja 2016 in 19. februarja 2016.
A formal invitation for all interested parties to submit comments on the 2014 Aviation Guidelines was published in the Official Journal on 15 April 2014 [12].
PRITOŽBA NA SKLEP O ZAČETKU POSTOPKA IZ LETA 2012 V ZVEZI S SEZNAMOM LETALIŠKIH PRISTOJBIN
Germany sent its comments on 12 May 2014.
Komisija se je pritožila na to sodbo pri Sodišču, slednje pa je potrdilo sodbo Splošnega sodišča [19].
Additional comments were submitted by Air Berlin, Infratil and the Schutzgemeinschaft gegen Fluglärm Lübeck und Umgebung eV (‘SGF’) [13].
PODROBEN OPIS UKREPOV
PROCEDURES SA.27585 AND SA.31149
OZADJE PREISKAVE IN OKVIR UKREPOV
On 28 January 2009, SGF sent a complaint regarding case SA.21877.
Zaledje letališča, razvoj potniškega prometa in letalski prevozniki, ki uporabljajo letališče
This was registered under the State aid case number CP 31/2009 (SA.27585).
Letališče Lübeck je približno 73 kilometrov oddaljeno od mesta Hamburg v zvezni deželi Schleswig-Holstein v Nemčiji.
By letter dated 16 April 2009, the Commission requested further information from Germany.
letališče Hamburg (približno 78 kilometrov od letališča Lübeck, približno 65 minut vožnje z avtomobilom),
Germany responded on 9 July 2009.
letališče Rostock (približno 134 kilometrov od letališča Lübeck, približno 1 ura in 19 minut vožnje z avtomobilom),
The deadline for the reply was 7 June 2011.
Preglednica 1
Germany replied by letter dated 7 June 2011, rejecting that the letter of 20 May 2011 was a reminder within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, as two of the questions appeared to be reworded and in their opinion one of the questions was new.
Razvoj potniškega prometa na letališču Lübeck v obdobju 1999–2013 [20]Leto
In the event of non-compliance with that reminder, the Commission would consider issuing an information injunction.
Na dan tega sklepa noben letalski prevoznik ne leti iz Lübecka.
Germany replied by letter dated 29 June 2011 to some of the questions and informed the Commission that the replies to the remaining questions would be provided during July 2011.
Na voljo niso ne redni ne čarterski leti.
By letter dated 4 July 2011 the Commission received further information from Ryanair.
Lastništvo letališča
By letter of 5 July 2011, the Commission sent a third reminder according to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 to Germany giving it the possibility to provide information concerning the remaining questions by 15 July 2011.
Letališče Lübeck je prvotno upravljala družba FLG, ki je bila družba z omejeno odgovornostjo.
Germany responded by letter dated 15 July 2011.
Nekatera letališka infrastruktura in zemljišče sta ostala v lasti mesta Lübeck.
By letter dated 18 July 2011 the Commission forwarded Ryanair's submission from 4 July 2011 to Germany, inviting for comments.
Družba FLG je lahko uporabljala letališko infrastrukturo na podlagi zakupne pogodbe.
Germany requested the translation of the Ryanair submission into German.
Lastništvo družbe FLG se je v zadnjih letih večkrat spremenilo.
On 7 February 2012, the Commission requested further information from Ryanair concerning the Oxera study.
Da bi družbi Infratil preprečili, da uveljavi svojo prodajno opcijo, sta mesto Lübeck in družba Infratil leta 2009 podpisala dodaten sporazum (Ergänzungsvereinbarung 2009).
On 13 February 2012, Ryanair requested an extension of the deadline to reply.
V skladu z dodatnim sporazumom iz leta 2009 je morala družba Infratil še naprej upravljati letališče do oktobra 2009 in je v zameno prejela nadomestilo za nekatere stroške (glej preglednico 3).
In reply, Germany asked the Commission in a letter dated 14 March 2012 for the blackening of certain information contained in the 2012 opening decision.
Prebivalci mesta Lübeck so na javnem glasovanju dne 25. aprila 2010 odločili, da se zagotovi preživetje letališča Lübeck.
The Commission partially accepted the request in a letter from 20 March 2012, explaining that it was unable to agree to the blackening of certain information.
Po mnenju mesta Lübeck so bile potrebne dodatne naložbe v izboljšanje letališke infrastrukture, da bi letališče lahko privatizirali.
Germany further challenged the Commission's position on confidentiality in a letter from 3 April 2012.
Mesto Lübeck je 16. avgusta 2012 v Dopolnilu k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije [22] objavilo javni razpis za prodajo letališča Lübeck.
The Commission sent a letter to Germany on 25 April 2012 in this matter, submitting another version of the 2012 opening decision and providing further arguments.
Do 24. septembra 2012 je bilo predloženih sedem interesnih pisem.
The Commission replied on 6 March 2012 by pointing out that it is for the Member State to submit such information to Ryanair.
Do 20. novembra 2012 so tri stranke predložile zavezujoče inkončne ponudbe.
After several interchanges between Ryanair, the Commission and Germany, Ryanair submitted a list of requests for removing confidential information and in addition criticised procedural issues on 27 April 2012.
Te tri ponudbe so bile primerjane.
Moreover, Germany submitted further requests by Ryanair for blackening of certain information to the Commission on 30 April 2012.
Primerjava je vključevala sistem za razdelitev točk, pri čemer so se upoštevali finančna ponudba ter ustrezni poslovni in razvojni načrti.
On 29 June 2012, the blackened version of the 2012 opening decision was sent to Ryanair.
Ponudba družbe 3Y Logistic und Projektbetreuung GmbH, Frankfurt (v nadaljnjem besedilu: 3Y), ki je predvidevala odkup sredstev, je bila daleč najugodnejša.
Those comments were forwarded to Germany by the Commission on 27 June 2012.
Bürgerschaft mesta Lübeck je dne 29. novembra 2012 soglašal s pogoji in prodajo.
In a letter dated 24 February 2012, the Commission asked Germany to provide more information on the cases within 20 days.
FLG je prenehala obstajati kot samostojna pravna oseba.
On 19 March 2012, Germany requested an extension of the deadline until 20 April 2012.
Komisija je proučila naslednje ukrepe, ki domnevno predstavljajo državno pomoč v korist družb FLG, Infratil, Ryanair in drugih letalskih prevoznikov, ki uporabljajo letališče.
The Commission agreed to an extension of the deadline until 17 April 2012 in a letter dated 21 March 2012.
MOREBITNA DRŽAVNA POMOČ V KORIST DRUŽBE FLG
Germany submitted the requested information on 17 April 2012.
Komisija je začela uradni postopek preiskave naslednjih ukrepov v korist družbe FLG:
In a letter dated 18 April 2012, the Commission stated that the information submitted by Germany was incomplete and requested the missing information to be submitted by 28 April 2012.
prevzem vseh izgub, nastalih v obdobju 1978–2004,
The Commission added that in case of non-compliance, an information injunction would be initiated in accordance with Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
zakupna pogodba za zemljišče in letališko infrastrukturo (pred 1. januarjem 2006) po ceni, nižji od tržne,
(37) On 14 May 2012, Germany submitted comments to the Commission concerning the 2012 Opening decision.
pomoč za naložbe družbi FLG na podlagi sklepa o regionalnih letališčih iz leta 2005 [23] in domnevna kršitev le-tega,nadomestilo izgub družbe FLG od novembra 2009,
All interested parties were given the possibility to comment on the decision within one month.
podreditev delničarskih posojil mesta Lübeck družbi FLG.
By two letters dated 16 August 2012 and 22 August 2012, Ryanair requested an extension of the deadline until 24 September 2012.
MOREBITNA DRŽAVNA POMOČ V KORIST DRUŽBE INFRATIL
Wizz Air requested an extension until 24 September on 24 August 2012.
Prodaja delnic družbe FLG
On 31 August 2012, Infratil requested an extension until 10 October 2012.
Zaradi stalne izgube iz poslovanja družbe FLG se je mesto Lübeck odločilo prodati svoje delnice v družbi FLG.