natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the agreement referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article is concluded before the court is seised to rule on matters of matrimonial property regimes, the agreement shall comply with Article 7(2).
Če se dogovor iz odstavka 2 tega člena sklene, preden sodišče začne postopek, da bi odločilo o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema, je dogovor skladen s členom 7(2).
Jurisdiction in other cases
Pristojnost v drugih primerih
Where no court of a Member State has jurisdiction pursuant to Article 4 or 5 or in cases other than those provided for in those Articles, jurisdiction to rule on a matter of the spouses' matrimonial property regime shall lie with the courts of the Member State:
Če ni pristojno nobeno sodišče države članice na podlagi člena 4 ali 5, ali v primerih, ki niso zajeti v navedenih členih, so za odločanje o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema pristojna sodišča države članice:
in whose territory the spouses are habitually resident at the time the court is seised; or failing that
na katere ozemlju imata zakonca v času, ko sodišče začne postopek, običajno prebivališče ali, če tega ni,
in whose territory the spouses were last habitually resident, insofar as one of them still resides there at the time the court is seised; or failing that
na katere ozemlju sta imela zakonca zadnje običajno prebivališče, če eden od zakoncev še vedno prebiva tam v času, ko sodišče začne postopek, ali, če tega ni,
in whose territory the respondent is habitually resident at the time the court is seised; or failing that
na katere ozemlju ima tožena stranka običajno prebivališče v času, ko sodišče začne postopek, ali, če tega ni,
of the spouses' common nationality at the time the court is seised.
katere skupno državljanstvo imata zakonca v času, ko sodišče začne postopek.
Choice of court
Izbira sodišča
In cases which are covered by Article 6, the parties may agree that the courts of the Member State whose law is applicable pursuant to Article 22, or point (a) or (b) of Article 26(1), or the courts of the Member State of the conclusion of the marriage shall have exclusive jurisdiction to rule on matters of their matrimonial property regime.
V zadevah, ki jih ureja člen 6, se stranki lahko dogovorita, da so sodišča države članice, katere pravo se uporablja na podlagi člena 22 ali točke (a) ali (b) člena 26(1), ali sodišča države članice, v kateri je bila zakonska zveza sklenjena, izključno pristojna za odločanje o premoženjskih razmerjih med njima.
The agreement referred to in paragraph 1 shall be expressed in writing and dated and signed by the parties.
Dogovor iz odstavka 1 se sestavi v pisni obliki, datira, podpišeta pa ga obe stranki.
Jurisdiction based on the appearance of the defendant
Pristojnost na podlagi spustitve v postopek
Apart from jurisdiction derived from other provisions of this Regulation, a court of a Member State whose law is applicable pursuant to Article 22 or point (a) or (b) of Article 26(1), and before which a defendant enters an appearance, shall have jurisdiction.
Poleg pristojnosti, ki izhaja iz drugih določb te uredbe, je pristojno tudi sodišče v državi članici, katere pravo se uporablja na podlagi člena 22 ali točke (a) ali (b) člena 26(1), in pred katerim se tožena stranka spusti v postopek.
This rule shall not apply where appearance was entered to contest the jurisdiction, or in cases covered by Article 4 or 5(1).
To pravilo pa se ne uporablja, če se je spustila v postopek, da bi ugovarjala pristojnosti, ali v primerih iz člena 4 ali člena 5(1).
Before assuming jurisdiction pursuant to paragraph 1, the court shall ensure that the defendant is informed of his right to contest the jurisdiction and of the consequences of entering or not entering an appearance.
Sodišče pred prevzemom pristojnosti na podlagi odstavka 1 zagotovi, da je bil toženi stranki zagotovljen pravni pouk o njeni pravici, da ugovarja pristojnosti, in o posledicah spustitve ali nespustitve v postopek.
Alternative jurisdiction
Alternativna pristojnost
By way of exception, if a court of the Member State that has jurisdiction pursuant to Article 4, 6, 7 or 8 holds that, under its private international law, the marriage in question is not recognised for the purposes of matrimonial property regime proceedings, it may decline jurisdiction.
Če sodišče države članice, ki je pristojno na podlagi člena 4, 6, 7 ali 8, presodi, da zadevna zakonska zveza v skladu z mednarodnim zasebnim pravom te države ni priznana za namene postopka v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema, lahko izjemoma zavrne pristojnost.
If the court decides to decline jurisdiction, it shall do so without undue delay.
Če sodišče sklene zavrniti pristojnost, to stori nemudoma.
Where a court having jurisdiction pursuant to Article 4 or 6 declines jurisdiction and where the parties agree to confer jurisdiction to the courts of any other Member State in accordance with Article 7, jurisdiction to rule on the matrimonial property regime shall lie with the courts of that Member State.
Če sodišče, ki ima pristojnost na podlagi člena 4 ali 6, zavrne pristojnost in se stranki dogovorita, da se pristojnost v skladu s členom 7 podeli sodiščem katere koli druge države članice, so za odločanje o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema pristojna sodišča te države članice.
In other cases, jurisdiction to rule on the matrimonial property regime shall lie with the courts of any other Member State pursuant to Article 6 or 8, or the courts of the Member State of the conclusion of the marriage.
V drugih primerih so za odločanje o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema pristojna sodišča katere koli druge države članice na podlagi člena 6 ali 8 ali sodišča države članice, v kateri je bila zakonska zveza sklenjena.
This Article shall not apply when the parties have obtained a divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment which is capable of being recognised in the Member State of the forum.
Ta člen se ne uporablja, kadar sta stranki pridobili odločbo o razvezi, prenehanju življenjske skupnosti ali razveljavitvi zakonske zveze, ki jo je mogoče priznati v državi članici sodišča, pred katerim teče postopek.
Where no court of a Member State has jurisdiction pursuant to Article 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8, or when all the courts pursuant to Article 9 have declined jurisdiction and no court has jurisdiction pursuant to Article 9(2), the courts of a Member State shall have jurisdiction in so far as immoveable property of one or both spouses are located in the territory of that Member State, but in that event the court seised shall have jurisdiction to rule only in respect of the immoveable property in question.
Če ni pristojno nobeno sodišče države članice na podlagi člena 4, 5, 6, 7 ali 8 ali če so vsa sodišča zavrnila pristojnost na podlagi člena 9 ter ni pristojno nobeno sodišče na podlagi člena 9(2), so pristojna sodišča države članice, če je nepremično premoženje enega ali obeh zakoncev na ozemlju te države članice, vendar je v tem primeru sodišče, ki je začelo postopek, pristojno samo za odločanje o tem nepremičnem premoženju.
Where no court of a Member State has jurisdiction pursuant to Article 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 10, or when all the courts pursuant to Article 9 have declined jurisdiction and no court of a Member State has jurisdiction pursuant to Article 9(2) or Article 10, the courts of a Member State may, on an exceptional basis, rule on a matrimonial property regime case if proceedings cannot reasonably be brought or conducted or would be impossible in a third state with which the case is closely connected.
Če ni pristojno nobeno sodišče države članice na podlagi člena 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ali 10 ali če so vsa sodišča zavrnila pristojnost na podlagi člena 9 ter ni pristojno nobeno sodišče države članice na podlagi člena 9(2) ali člena 10, lahko o zadevi v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema izjemoma odločajo sodišča države članice, če v tretji državi, s katero je zadeva tesno povezana, postopka ni mogoče začeti ali izvesti v razumnih okvirih ali če postopek tam ni mogoč.
Counterclaims
Nasprotne tožbe
The court in which proceedings are pending pursuant to Article 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (2), 10 or 11 shall also have jurisdiction to rule on a counterclaim if it falls within the scope of this Regulation.
Sodišče, pred katerim teče postopek v skladu s členom 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9(2), 10 ali 11, je pristojno tudi za odločanje o nasprotni tožbi, če ta spada na področje uporabe te uredbe.
Where the estate of the deceased whose succession falls under Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 comprises assets located in a third state, the court seised to rule on the matrimonial property regime may, at the request of one of the parties, decide not to rule on one or more of such assets if it may be expected that its decision in respect of those assets will not be recognised and, where applicable, declared enforceable in that third state.
Če zapuščina, katere dedovanje spada na področje uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 650/2012, obsega premoženje, ki je v tretji državi, lahko sodišče, ki je začelo postopek, da bi odločilo o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema, na zahtevo ene od strank odloči, da ne bo odločalo o enem ali več delih tega premoženja, če je mogoče pričakovati, da njegova odločitev o tem premoženju ne bo priznana in, kjer je ustrezno, razglašena za izvršljivo v tej tretji državi.
Seising a court
Začetek postopka
For the purpose of this Chapter, a court shall be deemed to be seised:
Za namene tega poglavja se šteje, da sodišče začne postopek:
at the time when the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document is lodged with the court, provided that the applicant has not subsequently failed to take the steps he was required to take to have service effected on the defendant;
v trenutku, ko je pisanje o začetku postopka ali enakovredno pisanje vloženo na sodišču, če tožeča stranka po tem ni opustila dejanj, ki bi jih morala opraviti, da bi bilo pisanje vročeno toženi stranki;
if the document has to be served before being lodged with the court, at a time when it is received by the authority responsible for service, provided that the applicant has not subsequently failed to take the steps he was required to take to have the document lodged with the court; or
če je treba pisanje vročiti še pred vložitvijo na sodišče, v trenutku, ko ga prejme organ, ki je odgovoren za vročitev, če tožeča stranka potem ni opustila dejanj, ki bi jih morala opraviti, da bi bilo pisanje vloženo na sodišču, ali
if the proceedings are opened on the court's own motion, at the time when the decision to open the proceedings is taken by the court, or, where such a decision is not required, at the time when the case is registered by the court.
če se postopek začne po uradni dolžnosti, v trenutku, ko sodišče sprejme sklep o začetku postopka, ali – če takšen sklep ni potreben – v trenutku, ko je zadeva vpisana pri sodišču.
Where a court of a Member State is seised of a matter of matrimonial property regime over which it has no jurisdiction under this Regulation, it shall declare of its own motion that it has no jurisdiction.
Če sodišče države članice začne postopek v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema, za katera to sodišče po tej uredbi ni pristojno, se to sodišče po uradni dolžnosti izreče za nepristojno.
Where a defendant habitually resident in a State other than the Member State where the action was brought does not enter an appearance, the court having jurisdiction pursuant to this Regulation shall stay the proceedings so long as it is not shown that the defendant has been able to receive the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document in time to arrange for his defence, or that all necessary steps have been taken to this end.
Če se tožena stranka, ki nima običajnega prebivališča v državi, v kateri proti njej teče postopek, ne spusti v postopek, sodišče, pristojno na podlagi te uredbe, prekine postopek za toliko časa, dokler se ne ugotovi, da je tožena stranka pisanje o začetku postopka ali enakovredno pisanje lahko prejela pravočasno, da bi lahko pripravila svojo obrambo, ali da je bilo za to storjeno vse potrebno.
Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council [12] shall apply instead of paragraph 1 of this Article if the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document had to be transmitted from one Member State to another pursuant to that Regulation.
Namesto odstavka 1 tega člena se uporabi člen 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 1393/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12], kadar je treba v skladu z navedeno uredbo pisanje o začetku postopka ali enakovredno pisanje poslati iz ene države članice v drugo.
Where Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 is not applicable, Article 15 of the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters shall apply if the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document had to be transmitted abroad pursuant to that Convention.
Če se Uredba (ES) št. 1393/2007 ne uporablja, se uporabi člen 15 Haaške konvencije z dne 15. novembra 1965 o vročitvi sodnih in zunajsodnih listin v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v tujini, če je bilo treba v skladu s to konvencijo pisanje o začetku postopka ali enakovredno pisanje poslati v tujino.
Where proceedings involving the same cause of action and between the same parties are brought before courts of different Member States, any court other than the court first seised shall of its own motion stay its proceedings until such time as the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established.
Če pred sodišči različnih držav članic tečejo postopki z istim zahtevkom med istima strankama, vsa sodišča, razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, po uradni dolžnosti prekinejo postopke za toliko časa, dokler se ne ugotovi pristojnost sodišča, ki je prvo začelo postopek.
In the cases referred to in paragraph 1, upon request by a court seised of the dispute, any other court seised shall without delay inform the former court of the date when it was seised.
V zadevah iz odstavka 1 katero koli sodišče, ki je začelo postopek, na zahtevo sodišča, ki je začelo postopek v sporu, nemudoma obvesti slednje o datumu začetka postopka.
Where the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established, any court other than the court first seised shall decline jurisdiction in favour of that court.
Ko se ugotovi pristojnost sodišča, ki je prvo začelo postopek, se vsa sodišča, razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, izrečejo za nepristojna v korist tega sodišča.
Where related actions are pending in the courts of different Member States, any court other than the court first seised may stay its proceedings.
Če pred sodišči različnih držav članic tečejo sorodne pravde, lahko vsa sodišča, razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, prekinejo postopek.
Where the actions referred to in paragraph 1 are pending at first instance, any court other than the court first seised may also, on the application of one of the parties, decline jurisdiction if the court first seised has jurisdiction over the actions in question and its law permits the consolidation thereof.
Če pravde iz odstavka 1 tečejo na prvi stopnji, se lahko vsa sodišča, razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, na zahtevo ene od strank prav tako izrečejo za nepristojna, če je sodišče, ki je prvo začelo postopek, pristojno za odločanje o zadevnih pravdah in če njegovo pravo dovoljuje združitev pravd.
For the purposes of this Article, actions are deemed to be related where they are so closely connected that it is expedient to hear and determine them together to avoid the risk of irreconcilable decisions resulting from separate proceedings.
Za namene tega člena se šteje, da so pravde sorodne, če so tako tesno povezane med seboj, da se zdita njihova skupna obravnava in odločanje o njih smiselna, da bi se s tem izognili nevarnosti nezdružljivih odločb, ki bi izhajale iz ločenih postopkov.
Application may be made to the courts of a Member State for such provisional, including protective, measures as may be available under the law of that State, even if, under this Regulation, the courts of another Member State have jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter.
Pri sodiščih države članice se lahko vloži zahteva za začasne ukrepe, vključno z ukrepi zavarovanja, ki jih predvideva pravo te države, tudi če so po tej uredbi za odločanje o glavni stvari pristojna sodišča druge države članice.
The law designated as applicable by this Regulation shall be applied whether or not it is the law of a Member State.
Pravo, ki se uporablja po tej uredbi, se uporablja ne glede na to, ali je pravo države članice ali ne.
Unity of the applicable law
Enotnost prava, ki se uporablja
The law applicable to a matrimonial property regime pursuant to Article 22 or 26 shall apply to all assets falling under that regime, regardless of where the assets are located.
Pravo, ki se uporablja za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema na podlagi člena 22 ali 26, se uporablja za celotno premoženje, ki je urejeno s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema, ne glede na to, kje se premoženje nahaja.
Choice of the applicable law
Izbira prava, ki se uporablja
The spouses or future spouses may agree to designate, or to change, the law applicable to their matrimonial property regime, provided that that law is one of the following:
Zakonca ali bodoča zakonca lahko z dogovorom določita ali spremenita pravo, ki se uporablja za njuna premoženjska razmerja, če je to pravo:
the law of the State where the spouses or future spouses, or one of them, is habitually resident at the time the agreement is concluded; or
pravo države, v kateri imata zakonca ali bodoča zakonca ali eden od njiju v času sklenitve dogovora običajno prebivališče, ali
the law of a State of nationality of either spouse or future spouse at the time the agreement is concluded.
pravo države, katere državljanstvo ima eden od zakoncev ali bodočih zakoncev v času sklenitve dogovora.
Unless the spouses agree otherwise, a change of the law applicable to the matrimonial property regime made during the marriage shall have prospective effect only.
Če se zakonca ne dogovorita drugače, ima sprememba prava, ki se uporablja za premoženjska razmerja med njima, v času trajanja zakonske zveze učinek samo za naprej.
Any retroactive change of the applicable law under paragraph 2 shall not adversely affect the rights of third parties deriving from that law.
Nobena sprememba prava, ki se uporablja, z učinkom za nazaj na podlagi odstavka 2 ne sme negativno vplivati na pravice tretjih oseb, ki izhajajo iz tega prava.
Formal validity of the agreement on a choice of applicable law
Formalna veljavnost dogovora o izbiri prava, ki se uporablja
The agreement referred to in Article 22 shall be expressed in writing, dated and signed by both spouses.
Dogovor iz člena 22 se sklene v pisni obliki in datira, podpišeta pa ga oba zakonca.
If the law of the Member State in which both spouses have their habitual residence at the time the agreement is concluded lays down additional formal requirements for matrimonial property agreements, those requirements shall apply.
Če pravo države članice, v kateri imata oba zakonca v času sklenitve dogovora običajno prebivališče, za dogovore o ureditvi premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema določa dodatne obličnostne zahteve, se uporabljajo te zahteve.
If the spouses are habitually resident in different Member States at the time the agreement is concluded and the laws of those States provide for different formal requirements for matrimonial property agreements, the agreement shall be formally valid if it satisfies the requirements of either of those laws.
Če imata zakonca v času sklenitve dogovora običajno prebivališče v različnih državah članicah, pravo vsake od njiju pa za dogovore o ureditvi premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema določa drugačne obličnostne zahteve, je dogovor formalno veljaven, če izpolnjuje zahteve prava ene od teh držav.
If only one of the spouses is habitually resident in a Member State at the time the agreement is concluded and that State lays down additional formal requirements for matrimonial property agreements, those requirements shall apply.
Če ima v času sklenitve dogovora običajno prebivališče v državi članici le eden od zakoncev, ta država pa za dogovore o ureditvi premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema določa dodatne obličnostne zahteve, se uporabljajo te zahteve.
The existence and validity of an agreement on choice of law or of any term thereof, shall be determined by the law which would govern it pursuant to Article 22 if the agreement or term were valid.
Sklenitev in veljavnost dogovora o izbiri prava ali veljavnost določb tega dogovora se presoja po pravu, ki bi se uporabljalo na podlagi člena 22, če bi bil dogovor ali njegove določbe veljavne.
Nevertheless, a spouse may, in order to establish that he did not consent, rely upon the law of the country in which he has his habitual residence at the time the court is seised if it appears from the circumstances that it would not be reasonable to determine the effect of his conduct in accordance with the law specified in paragraph 1.
Vseeno se lahko zakonec, kadar zatrjuje, da ni soglašal, sklicuje na pravo države, v kateri ima običajno prebivališče ob začetku postopka pred sodiščem, če je iz okoliščin mogoče sklepati, da učinka njegovega ravnanja ni ustrezno presojati po pravu iz odstavka 1.
Formal validity of a matrimonial property agreement
Formalna veljavnost dogovora o ureditvi premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema
The matrimonial property agreement shall be expressed in writing, dated and signed by both spouses.
Dogovor o ureditvi premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema se sklene v pisni obliki in datira, podpišeta pa ga oba zakonca.
If the law applicable to the matrimonial property regime imposes additional formal requirements, those requirements shall apply.
Če pravo, ki se uporablja za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema, določa dodatne obličnostne zahteve, se uporabljajo te zahteve.
Applicable law in the absence of choice by the parties
Pravo, ki se uporablja, če stranki ne izbereta prava
In the absence of a choice-of-law agreement pursuant to Article 22, the law applicable to the matrimonial property regime shall be the law of the State:
Če ni bil sklenjen dogovor o izbiri prava v skladu s členom 22, je pravo, ki se uporablja za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema, pravo države:
of the spouses' first common habitual residence after the conclusion of the marriage; or, failing that
v kateri imata zakonca prvo običajno skupno prebivališče po sklenitvi zakonske zveze ali, če tega ni,
of the spouses' common nationality at the time of the conclusion of the marriage; or, failing that
katere skupno državljanstvo imata zakonca v času sklenitve zakonske zveze ali, če tega ni,
with which the spouses jointly have the closest connection at the time of the conclusion of the marriage, taking into account all the circumstances.
s katero sta oba zakonca v času sklenitve zakonske zveze ob upoštevanju vseh okoliščin najtesneje povezana.
If the spouses have more than one common nationality at the time of the conclusion of the marriage, only points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1 shall apply.
Če imata zakonca v času sklenitve zakonske zveze več kot eno skupno državljanstvo, se uporabljata samo točki (a) in (c) odstavka 1.
By way of exception and upon application by either spouse, the judicial authority having jurisdiction to rule on matters of the matrimonial property regime may decide that the law of a State other than the State whose law is applicable pursuant to point (a) of paragraph 1 shall govern the matrimonial property regime if the applicant demonstrates that:
Sodni organ, ki je pristojen za odločanje o premoženjskih razmerjih med zakoncema, lahko izjemoma in na zahtevo enega od zakoncev odloči, da se za premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema uporabi pravo države, ki ni država, katere pravo se uporablja na podlagi točke (a) odstavka 1, če vlagatelj dokaže, da:
the spouses had their last common habitual residence in that other State for a significantly longer period of time than in the State designated pursuant to point (a) of paragraph 1; and
sta imela zakonca v tej drugi državi zadnje običajno skupno prebivališče znatno dalj časa kot v državi, določeno na podlagi točke (a) odstavka 1, in