natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from, inter alia, the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 102/2012 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila razširjena na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih med drugim iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot s poreklom iz Republike Koreje ali ne
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 11(4) and 13(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (osnovna uredba), ter zlasti členov 11(4) in 13(4) Uredbe,
Following two expiry reviews under Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures were maintained by Council Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 [3] and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 [4].
Po dveh pregledih zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe so bili protidampinški ukrepi ohranjeni z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1858/2005 [3] in Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 102/2012 [4].
By Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2010 [5], the Council extended the anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, following an anti-circumvention investigation under Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
Svet je po preiskavi proti izogibanju v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 400/2010 [5] razširil protidampinško dajatev na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz enakih proizvodov, poslanih iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali je njihovo poreklo deklarirano v Republiki Koreji ali ne.
The measures currently in force are an anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China as extended, inter alia, to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from the Republic of Korea whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, as last amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/90 [6] (‘the measures in force’).
Trenutno veljavni ukrepi so protidampinška dajatev, ki je bila z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 102/2012 uvedena na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila med drugim razširjena na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot s poreklom iz Republike Koreje ali ne, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2016/90 [6] („veljavni ukrepi“).
Imports into the Union of the product under review consigned from the Republic of Korea are subject to a duty of 60,4 %, with the exception of the product manufactured by companies which were exempted.
Za uvoz izdelka, ki se pregleduje, poslanega iz Republike Koreje, v Unijo se uporablja dajatev v višini 60,4 %, razen za izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo izvzete družbe.
The European Commission (‘the Commission’) received a request for an exemption from the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, under Articles 11(4) and 13(4) and of the basic Regulation.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je prejela zahtevek za izvzetje iz protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kot so bili razširjeni na uvožene izdelke, poslane iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom iz Republike Koreje ali ne, v skladu s členom 11(4) in členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged on 7 September 2015 by Daechang Steel Co.
Zahtevek je 7. septembra 2015 vložila družba Daechang Steel Co.
Ltd (‘the applicant’), an exporting producer of steel ropes and cables in the Republic of Korea (‘the country concerned’) and it was limited to the applicant.
Ltd. („vložnik“), proizvajalec izvoznik jeklenih vrvi in kablov iz Republike Koreje („zadevna država“); zahtevek je bil omejen na vložnika.
The applicant provided prima facie evidence that it did not export the product under review to the Union during the investigation period used in the investigation that led to the extended measures (1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009), that it is not related to any of the exporting producers of the product under review which are subject to the anti-dumping duties in force, that it has not circumvented the measures applicable to steel ropes and cables of Chinese origin and that it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Union.
Vložnik je predložil dokaze prima facie, da izdelka, ki se pregleduje, v obdobju preiskave (od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009), ki je privedla do razširjenih ukrepov, ni izvažal v Unijo, da ni povezan z nobenim od proizvajalcev izvoznikov izdelka, ki se pregleduje, za katere se uporabljajo veljavne protidampinške dajatve, da se ni izogibal ukrepom, ki se uporabljajo za jeklene vrvi in kable s poreklom iz Kitajske, ter da je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost, da bo izvozil znatno količino zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
Having examined the evidence submitted by the applicant and following consultation of the Member States, and after the Union industry was given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated the investigation on 26 November 2015 by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2179 [7].
Po proučitvi dokazov, ki jih je predložil vložnik, in po posvetovanju z državami članicami ter po tem, ko je imela industrija Unije možnost za pripombe, je Komisija 26. novembra 2015 začela preiskavo z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/2179 [7].
Furthermore, pursuant to Article 3 of that Regulation, the Commission directed customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports of the product under review consigned from the Republic of Korea and produced and sold for export to the Union by the applicant, in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je Komisija v skladu s členom 3 navedene uredbe carinske organe napotila, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza izdelka, ki se pregleduje, poslanega iz Republike Koreje, ki ga vložnik proizvaja in prodaja za izvoz v Unijo, v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe.
The product subject to the review is steel ropes and cables, including locked coil ropes, excluding ropes and cables of stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm, consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not (‘the product under review’), currently falling within CN codes ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 and ex73121098 (TARIC codes 7312108113, 7312108313, 7312108513, 7312108913 and 7312109813).
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, so jeklene vrvi in kabli, vključno z zaprtimi svitki vrvi, razen vrvi in kablov iz nerjavnega jekla, z največjim prečnim prerezom več kot 3 mm, poslani iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom iz Republike Koreje ali ne („izdelek, ki se pregleduje“), trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 in ex73121098 (oznake TARIC 7312108113, 7312108313, 7312108513, 7312108913 in 7312109813).
The reporting period covered the period from 1 October 2014 to 30 September 2015.
Preiskava
Data was collected from 2008 until the end of the reporting period (‘the investigation period’).
Komisija je vložnika in predstavnike Republike Koreje uradno obvestila o začetku pregleda.
The Commission officially advised the applicant and the representatives of the Republic of Korea of the initiation of the review.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih zahtevkov.
Interested parties were invited to make their views known and were informed of the possibility to request a hearing.
Komisija je vložniku poslala vprašalnik in prejela odgovor v roku, ki je bil določen.
No requests were received.
Komisija je zbrala in na kraju samem preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za pregled.
The Commission sent a questionnaire to the applicant and received a reply within the given deadline.
V prostorih vložnika je bil izveden preveritveni obisk.
The Commission sought and verified on the spot all the information deemed necessary for the purposes of the review.
Komisija je proučila, ali so pogoji za odobritev izvzetja v skladu s členoma 11(4) in 13(4) izpolnjeni, in sicer:
A verification visit was carried out at the premises of the applicant.
da vložnik v obdobju preiskave, ki je privedla do razširjenih ukrepov, to je od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009, ni izvažal izdelka, ki se pregleduje,
The Commission examined whether the conditions for granting an exemption under Article 11(4) and 13(4) were fulfilled, namely whether:
da je začel vložnik izdelek, ki se pregleduje, izvažati po koncu obdobja preiskave proti izogibanju,
The applicant did not export the product under review during the investigation period used in the investigation that led to the extended measures, namely the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009.
da vložnik ni povezan s proizvajalci izvozniki izdelka, ki se pregleduje, za katere se uporabljajo veljavne protidampinške dajatve, in se ni izogibal ukrepom, ki se uporabljajo za jeklene vrvi in kable s poreklom iz Kitajske.
The applicant began exporting the product under review after the end of the investigation period of the anti-circumvention investigation.
C. UGOTOVITVE
The applicant is not related to any of the exporting producers of the product under review which are subject to the anti-dumping duties in force, and that it has not circumvented the measures applicable to steel ropes and cables of Chinese origin.
Preiskava je tudi potrdila, da vložnik v obdobju preiskave proti izogibanju, ki je privedla do razširjenih ukrepov, to je od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009, izdelka, ki se pregleduje, ni izvažal v Unijo.
C. FINDINGS
Vložnik je izdelek, ki se pregleduje, prvič izvozil po razširitvi ukrepov na Republiko Korejo, in sicer v drugi polovici leta 2015.
The investigation confirmed that the applicant had not exported the product under review to the Union during the investigation period of the anti-circumvention investigation that led to the extended measures, that is 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009.
Preiskava je tudi potrdila, da vložnik ni bil povezan z nobenim od kitajskih izvoznikov ali proizvajalcev, za katere se uporabljajo protidampinški ukrepi, ki jih uvaja Izvedbena Uredba (EU) št. 102/2012.
The applicant's first exports of the product under review occurred subsequent to the extension of measures to the Republic of Korea, more precisely in the second half of 2015.
Poleg tega je preiskava potrdila, da je vložnik dejanski proizvajalec izdelka, ki se pregleduje, in ni vpleten v prakse izogibanja.
Next, the investigation confirmed that the applicant was not related to any Chinese exporters or producers subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012.
Vložnik kupuje doma proizvedene jeklene žičnate palice in surovine (na primer cink in svinec), vendar tudi uvaža jeklene žičnate palice iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki so nato lužene, vlečene, pocinkane, drugič vlečene, pritrjene in zaprte v njegovih proizvodnih obratih v Republiki Koreji.
Furthermore, the investigation confirmed that the applicant is a genuine producer of the product under review not engaged in circumvention practices.
Končni izdelek se prodaja na domačem trgu in izvaža v Združene države, Azijo in Unijo.
The applicant purchases domestically produced steel wire rod and sub-materials (such as zinc and lead) but also imports steel wire rod from the People's Republic of China, which is subsequently pickled, drawn, galvanised, drawn a second time, stranded and closed at its manufacturing facilities in the Republic of Korea.
Proizvodne dejavnosti je mogoče šteti za sestavljanje ali končno izdelavo.
The finished product is sold domestically and also exported to the United States, Asia and the Union.
Člen 13(2) osnovne uredbe določa pogoje, pod katerimi se za sestavljanje šteje, da se izogiba ukrepom.
The production activities can be considered as an assembly or completion operation.
Eden od pogojev v skladu s točko (b) navedenega člena je, da vrednost zadevnih delov predstavlja 60 % ali več celotne vrednosti delov sestavljenega izdelka.
Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation lays down the conditions under which an assembly operation will be considered to be circumventing the measures.
Med preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil delež kitajskih surovin, ki jih je uporabil vložnik, znatno pod pragom 60 %, ki ga določa člen 13(2)(b) osnovne uredbe.
Under point (b) of that Article, one condition is that the parts in question constitute more than 60 % of the total value of the parts of the assembled product.
Delež kitajskih delov (tj. surovin) je znašal 38 %.
During the investigation it was established that the proportion of Chinese raw materials used by the applicant was significantly below the threshold of 60 % required under Article 13(2)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Če je ta prag presežen, je treba v skladu s členom 13(2)(b) ugotoviti, ali je bil dosežen prag 25 % dodane vrednosti („preskus dodane vrednosti“).
The percentage of Chinese parts (namely raw materials) used was 38 %.
Prag 60 % skupne vrednosti delov ni bil presežen.
Where that threshold is exceeded, Article 13(2)(b) requires that it is established whether the 25 % threshold of value added was reached (the ‘value-added test’).
Zato na podlagi dejanskih stroškov, ki so nastali v obdobju poročanja, ni bilo treba ugotavljati, ali je bil dosežen prag 25 % dodane vrednosti v smislu člena 13(2)(b) osnovne uredbe.
Hence, on the basis of the actual costs incurred during the reporting period, it was not necessary to establish whether the 25 % threshold of value added was reached within the meaning of Article 13(2)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo treba opraviti preskus dodane vrednosti v skladu s členom 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
The applicant started with the production of the product under review mid-2015.
Ta preskus je pokazal, da je dodana vrednost delov iz Ljudske republike Kitajske znatno presegala prag 25 % proizvodnih stroškov, kot ga določa člen 13(2)(b) osnovne uredbe.
Due to the exceptional manufacturing costs incurred during the start-up production phase, another calculation was performed on the basis of standard costs of manufacturing (excluding start-up costs and anticipating a high production capacity utilisation rate).
Zato se za proizvodne dejavnosti vložnika ne šteje, da vključujejo izogibanje v smislu člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
It was established that the proportion of Chinese-origin raw materials then constituted more than the 60 % of the total value of the parts of the final product (69 %).
Preiskava je potrdila, da vložnik ni kupoval končnega izdelka, ki se pregleduje, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, da bi ga ponovno prodajal ali prevažal v Unijo in da je družba lahko upravičila svoj celotni izvoz v obdobju poročanja.
For that reason the value-added test under Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation was carried out.
Na podlagi ugotovitev iz uvodnih izjav 13 do 18 Komisija ugotavlja, da vložnik izpolnjuje pogoje za izvzetje v skladu s členoma 11(4) in 13(4) osnovne uredbe.
That test demonstrated that the value added to the parts brought in from the People's Republic of China was significantly above the 25 % of the manufacturing costs threshold as stipulated in Article 13(2)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Zgornje ugotovitve so bile razkrite vložniku in industriji Unije, ki sta imela možnost, da predložita pripombe.
Therefore, the applicant's production activities are not considered to constitute circumvention in the sense of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik je potrdil, da se strinja z ugotovitvami Komisije.
Last, the investigation confirmed that the applicant was not purchasing the finished product under review from the People's Republic of China in order to resell or tranship to the Union and that the company could justify all its exports during the reporting period.
Predložena ni bila nobena dodatna pripomba.
In light of the findings described in recitals 13 to 18, the Commission concludes that the applicant fulfils the conditions for an exemption under Articles 11(4) and 13(4) of the basic Regulation.
D. SPREMEMBA SEZNAMA DRUŽB, KI SO UPRAVIČENE DO IZVZETJA VELJAVNIH UKREPOV
The findings above were disclosed to the applicant and the Union industry, which were given the opportunity to provide comments.
V skladu z navedenimi ugotovitvami je treba vložnika dodati na seznam družb, ki so oproščene protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 102/2012.
The applicant submitted that it agreed to the Commission's findings.
Kot je določeno v členu 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 400/2010, je uporaba izvzetja pogojena s tem, da se carinskim organom držav članic predloži veljaven trgovinski račun, ki je skladen z zahtevami iz Priloge k navedeni uredbi.
No further comments were submitted.
Če tak račun ni predložen, se protidampinška dajatev uporablja še naprej.
D. MODIFICATION OF THE LIST OF COMPANIES BENEFITTING FROM AN EXEMPTION TO THE MEASURES IN FORCE
Poleg tega izvzetje iz razširjenih ukrepov, odobrenih za uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov, ki jih proizvaja vložnik, v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe ostane veljavno pod pogojem, da je upravičeno na podlagi dokončno ugotovljenih dejstev.
In accordance with the above findings, the applicant should be added to the list of companies that are exempted from the anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012.
Če bodo novi dokazi prima facie pokazali drugače, lahko Komisija začne preiskavo za ugotovitev upravičenosti umika izvzetja.
As laid down in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 400/2010, the application of the exemption is to be conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
Izvzetje iz razširjenih ukrepov, odobreno za uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov, ki jih proizvaja vložnik, temelji na podlagi ugotovitev tega pregleda.
If no such an invoice is presented, the anti-dumping duty continues to apply.
To izvzetje se torej uporablja izključno za uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Republike Koreje, ki jih proizvaja zgoraj navedena pravna oseba.
In addition, the exemption from the extended measures granted to imports of steel ropes and cables produced by the applicant, in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation, remains valid on condition that the facts as finally ascertained justify the exemption.
Za uvožene jeklene vrvi in kable, ki jih proizvaja katera koli družba, ki ni izrecno poimensko navedena v členu 1(4) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 102/2012, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, se izvzetje ne uporablja, velja pa stopnja preostale dajatve, uvedena z navedeno uredbo.
Should new prima facie evidence indicate otherwise, an investigation may be initiated by the Commission to establish whether withdrawal of the exemption is warranted.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 102/2012, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Izvedbeno Uredbo (EU) 2016/90, bi bilo treba spremeniti, da se v razpredelnico v členu 1(4) vključi podjetje Daechang Steel Co.
This exemption is thus exclusively applicable to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from the Republic of Korea and produced by the abovementioned specific legal entity.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 –
Imported steel ropes and cables produced by any company not specifically mentioned in Article 1(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 with its name, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, should not benefit from the exemption and should be subject to the residual duty rate as imposed by that Regulation.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012, as last amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/90, should be amended to include Daechang Steel Co.
Člen 1
Ltd in the table set out in its Article 1(4).
Razpredelnica iz člena 1(4) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 102/2012, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2016/90, se nadomesti z naslednjo razpredelnico:
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009,
Država
The table set out in Article 1(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 as last amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/90, is replaced by the following table:
Republika Koreja
TARIC additional code
Carinskim organom se dajo navodila, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza, ki se izvaja v skladu s členom 3 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2179.
Dae Heung Industrial Co., Ltd, 185 Pyunglim — Ri, Daesan-Myun, Haman — Gun, Gyungnam
Člen 3
The customs authorities are directed to cease the registration of imports carried out pursuant to Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2179.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
No anti-dumping duty shall be collected on the imports thus registered.
V Bruslju, 18. julija 2016
Done at Brussels, 18 July 2016.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1796/1999 z dne 12. avgusta 1999 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, o dokončnem pobiranju začasnih dajatev, uvedenih na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov po poreklu iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Madžarske, Indije, Mehike, Poljske, Južne Afrike in Ukrajine, ter o ustavitvi protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom po poreklu iz Republike Koreje (UL L 217, 17.8.1999, str. 1).
For the Commission
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1858/2005 z dne 8. novembra 2005 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Indije, Južne Afrike in Ukrajine po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 (UL L 299, 16.11.2005, str. 1).
The President
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 102/2012 z dne 27. januarja 2012 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Ukrajine, kakor je bila razširjena na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Maroka, Moldavije in Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot s poreklom iz teh držav ali ne, po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 in o zaključku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa glede uvoza jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Južne Afrike v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL L 36, 9.2.2012, str. 1).