natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Normal value
Domača prodaja je reprezentativna, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu na proizvajalca izvoznika v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije predstavljal vsaj 5 % njegovega celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
The Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales for each cooperating exporting producer was representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi tega je bilo za vse proizvajalce izvoznike ugotovljeno, da je bil njihov celotni obseg prodaje podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu reprezentativen.
The domestic sales are representative if the total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers on the domestic market per exporting producer represented at least 5 % of its total export sales volume of the product concerned to the Union during the AIP.
Komisija je za proizvajalce izvoznike z reprezentativno domačo prodajo naknadno ugotovila, katere vrste izdelka, prodane na domačem trgu, so bile enake vrstam izdelka, prodanim za izvoz v Unijo, ali primerljive z njimi.
On this basis, the total sales by each exporting producer of the like product on the domestic market were representative.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je domača prodaja posameznih sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov na njihovem domačem trgu reprezentativna za posamezne vrste izdelka, ki so enake vrstam, prodanim za izvoz v Unijo, ali primerljive z njimi.
The Commission subsequently identified the product types sold domestically that were identical or comparable with the product types sold for export to the Union for the exporting producers with representative domestic sales.
Domača prodaja vrste izdelka je reprezentativna, če celotni obseg domače prodaje navedene vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije predstavlja vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza enake ali primerljive vrste izdelka v Unijo.
The Commission then examined whether the domestic sales by each cooperating exporting producer on its domestic market for each product type that is identical or comparable with a product type sold for export to the Union were representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe za vsako vrsto izdelka določila delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije, da bi se odločila, ali bo za izračun normalne vrednosti uporabila dejansko domačo prodajo.
The domestic sales of a product type are representative if the total volume of domestic sales of that product type to independent customers during the AIP represents at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the identical or comparable product type to the Union.
Normalna vrednost je bila izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije ali kot tehtano povprečje samo dobičkonosne prodaje.
The Commission next defined the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market for each product type during the AIP in order to decide whether to use actual domestic sales for the calculation of the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Če je bila potrebna pretvorba valute, so bile vse vrednosti pretvorjene v tajvanski dolar z mesečnimi menjalnimi tečaji, ki jih je Komisija predložila v protidampinškem vprašalniku, ali z uporabo notranjega deviznega tečaja proizvajalcev izvoznikov na podlagi tajvanskih carinskih stopenj.
The normal value was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales during the AIP or as a weighted average of the profitable sales only.
V obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije ni bilo bistvene razlike med tema dvema stopnjama.
All values where currency conversion was needed were converted into Taiwanese dollars using either the monthly rates provided by the Commission in the anti-dumping questionnaire or using the exporting producers internal exchange rates based on the Taiwanese customs rates.
Če ni bilo prodaje ali zadostne prodaje določene vrste podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine, je Komisija konstruirala normalno vrednost v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe
There was no material difference between those two rates in the AIP.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da se je povprečnim proizvodnim stroškom podobnega izdelka sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije dodalo naslednje:
Where there were no or insufficient sales of a product type of the like product in the ordinary course of trade the Commission constructed the normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
tehtano povprečje prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov („PSA-stroški“) sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije nastali pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine, ter
Normal value was constructed by adding the following to the average cost of production of the like product of the cooperating exporting producers during the AIP:
tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki so ga v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije dosegli sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine.
the weighted average selling, general and administrative (‘SG&A’) expenses incurred by the cooperating exporting producers on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the AIP; and
En proizvajalec izvoznik je del zadevnih izdelkov prodajal prek povezanega storitvenega centra, ki je zagotavljal nekaj sprememb, prilagojenih kupcu (rezanje, vrezovanje, loščenje itd.).
the weighted average profit realised by the cooperating exporting producers on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the AIP.
Za izračun konsolidiranega stroška proizvodnje tega proizvajalca izvoznika so bili ti dodatni stroški prišteti stroškom zadevne vrste izdelka z uporabo metode tehtanega povprečja.
One exporting producer was selling part of the product concerned via its related service centre, which was providing some customer-specific modifications (cutting, slitting, polishing, etc.).
Kot v prvotni preiskavi se je podobni izdelek na tajvanskem trgu prodajal distributerjem, ki so ga nato izvozili.
To calculate the consolidated cost of production for this exporting producer, those additional costs were added to the costs of the respective product type using the weighted average method.
Za rešitev tega problema Komisija ni upoštevala vse prodaje največjemu tajvanskemu distributerju/storitvenemu centru, ki je glede na svoj odziv po vzorčenju veliko večino izdelkov nadalje predelal.
As in the original investigation, some sales of the like product on the Taiwanese market were done to distributors that further exported it.
Poleg tega Komisija ni upoštevala domače prodaje, ki je bila dobavljena carinskemu skladišču ali mednarodnemu pristanišču za izvoz.
To address this issue the Commission disregarded all sales to the largest Taiwanese distributor/service centre, who according to its sampling response exported the vast majority of the products further processed.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je deloval tudi kot storitveni center za zadevni izdelek in podobni izdelek, kupljen od drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
In addition, the Commission disregarded domestic sales that were either delivered to a bonded warehouse or to the international port for export.
Komisija je upoštevala le interno hladno valjane izdelke za izračun normalne vrednosti in izvozno ceno za tega proizvajalca izvoznika.
One exporting producer operated also as a service centre for the product concerned and the like product purchased from other exporting producers.
Izvozna cena
The Commission only considered the in-house cold rolled products for calculating the normal value and export price for this exporting producer.
Komisija je določila izvozno ceno za obdobje ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije, kot je razloženo v uvodnih izjavah (22) do (24) zgoraj.
The Commission established the export price for the AIP as explained in recitals (22) to (24) above.
Komisija je normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno proizvajalcev izvoznikov primerjala na podlagi franko tovarna.
Comparison
Kadar je Komisija to lahko upravičila s potrebo po zagotovitvi poštene primerjave, je v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno prilagodila za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price of the exporting producers on an ex-works basis.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za stroške prevoza, zavarovanja, manipulativne stroške, stroške natovarjanja in tozadevne stroške, stroške pakiranja, kreditov, bančne stroške in stroške provizij.
Where justified by the need to ensure a fair comparison, the Commission adjusted the normal value and/or the export price for differences affecting prices and price comparability, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnje dampinga
Adjustments were made for transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packing, credit, bank charges and commissions.
Komisija je za sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika primerjala tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost vsake vrste podobnega izdelka s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe.
Dumping margins
Na podlagi tega so tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
For the cooperating exporting producers, the Commission compared the weighted average normal value of each type of the like product with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Preglednica 2
On this basis, the weighted average dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Stopnje dampinga, Tajvan
Table 2
Stopnja dampinga v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije
Dumping margins, Taiwan
Ni dampinga
Dumping margin in AIP
SKLEP
No dumping
Ponovni izračun stopenj dampinga je pokazal, da se je stopnja dampinga za skupino podjetij, ki so bila preiskana v prvotni preiskavi, zmanjšala.
CONCLUSION
Za drugi dve sodelujoči podjetji, ki nista sodelovali v prvotni preiskavi, je stopnja dampinga nižja od trenutno veljavne stopnje dajatve.
The recalculation of the dumping margins showed that the dumping margin for the group of companies investigated in the original investigation decreased.
Kot sklep, ponovna preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije se zaključi brez spremembe veljavnih ukrepov.
For the other two cooperating companies, which did not cooperate in the original investigation, the dumping margin is lower than the current applicable duty rate.
Ugotovitve ponovne preiskave so bile razkrite zainteresiranim stranem.
As a conclusion the absorption reinvestigation shall be terminated without amending the measures in force.
Pripombe je predložilo samo združenje Eurofer.
The findings of the reinvestigation have been disclosed to interested parties.
Eurofer je tako v svoji pisni izjavi kot na obravnavi izrazil razočaranje nad rezultati ponovne preiskave Komisije.
Only Eurofer submitted comments.
Eurofer je trdil, da Komisija ni ustrezno upoštevala domnevnih izkrivljanj na tajvanskem domačem trgu.
Eurofer in its written submission and at a hearing expressed its disappointment with the results of the Commission's reinvestigation.
Prvo izkrivljanje po trditvah Euroferja je zadevalo izvoz tajvanskih trgovcev/distributerjev ter shemo izvozov in popustov.
Eurofer claimed that the Commission did not take adequate account of the alleged distortions in the Taiwanese domestic market.
Eurofer je v zvezi s tem predložil dodatne dokaze.
The first distortion alleged by Eurofer concerned exports by the Taiwanese traders/distributors and the export-discount scheme.
Drugo domnevno izkrivljanje zadeva odnos med tajvanskimi predelovalnimi stroji in nekaterimi njihovimi trgovci/distributerji.
Eurofer provided additional evidence in this regard.
Eurofer je trdil, da bi Komisija morala ugotoviti obstoj nesodelovanja in se zanašati na razpoložljiva negativna dejstva.
The second alleged distortion concerned the relation between Taiwanese mills and some of their traders/distributors.
Komisija je s prvotno preiskavo in podatki, zbranimi in preverjenimi med ponovno preiskavo, dodobra spoznala tajvanski trg.
Eurofer argued that the Commission should conclude at the existence of non-cooperation and rely on adverse facts available.
Komisija je uporabila vse razpoložljive informacije, da bi pravilno določila normalno vrednost, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah (39) in (40) zgoraj.
The Commission had a solid understanding of the Taiwanese market as a result of the original investigation and on the basis of the data collected and verified during the reinvestigation.
Komisija je uporabila metodologijo iz osnovne uredbe skladno s prvotno preiskavo ter ustrezno upoštevala posebnosti tajvanskega domačega trga.
The Commission used all available information to accurately determine the normal value as described in recitals (39) and (40) above.
Zlasti je sklenila, da je izključitev določenih prodaj nekaterim subjektom iz izračuna normalne vrednosti, kot je opisan v uvodnih izjavah (39) in (40), bolj objektivna kot uporaba negativnih dejstev, ki so na voljo v tem primeru.
The Commission applied the methodology provided in the basic Regulation, consistently with the original investigation and took due account of the specificities of the Taiwanese domestic market.
Ker trditev združenja Eurofer ni prispevala nobene bistveno nove informacije, ki bi spremenila uporabljeno metodologijo, je Komisija potrdila sklep iz uvodne izjave (47) zgoraj.
In particular, it concluded that the exclusion of a number of sales to certain entities from the calculation of the normal value, as described in recitals (39) and (40), is more objective than the application of adverse facts available in the present case.
Ta uredba je v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 –
As the Eurofer's claim did not bring any fundamentally new information to change the methodology used, the Commission confirmed the conclusion set out in recital (47) above.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
This regulation is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Ponovna preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije v zvezi z uvozom hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Tajvana v skladu s členom 12 Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 se zaključi brez spremembe veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
The absorption reinvestigation concerning imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in Taiwan pursuant to Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 is hereby terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
For the Commission
UL L 176, 30.6.2016, str. 21.
The President
UL L 224, 27.8.2015, str.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
10.
OJ L 224, 27.8.2015, p. 10.
UL C 291, 11.8.2016, str. 7.
OJ C 291, 11.8.2016, p. 7.
Obdobje ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije („AIP“) je potekalo od 1. julija 2015 do 30. junija 2016.
The absorption reinvestigation period (‘AIP’) was from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016.
Obdobje prvotne preiskave („OIP“) je potekalo od 1. januarja 2013 do 31. decembra 2013.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/680
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2017/680
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/685
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) 2017/685
implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran
o izvajanju Uredbe (EU) št. 359/2011 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim osebam, subjektom in organom zaradi razmer v Iranu
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 of 12 April 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran [1], and in particular Article 12(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 359/2011 z dne 12. aprila 2011 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim osebam, subjektom in organom zaradi razmer v Iranu [1] ter zlasti člena 12(4) Uredbe,
On 12 April 2011, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.
Svet je 12. aprila 2011 sprejel Uredbo (EU) št. 359/2011.
On the basis of a review of Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP [2], the Council has decided that the restrictive measures therein should be renewed until 13 April 2018.
Svet je na podlagi pregleda Sklepa Sveta 2011/235/SZVP [2] sklenil, da bi bilo treba omejevalne ukrepe iz navedenega sklepa podaljšati do 13. aprila 2018.
The Council has also concluded that the entries concerning certain persons included in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 should be updated.
Svet je tudi sklenil, da bi bilo treba posodobiti vnose, ki zadevajo nekatere osebe iz Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 359/2011.
Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 should be amended accordingly,
Prilogo I k Uredbi (EU) št. 359/2011 bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga I k Uredbi (EU) št. 359/2011 se spremeni, kot je določeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p.
UL L 100, 14.4.2011, str.
Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP of 12 April 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran (OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51).
Sklep Sveta 2011/235/SZVP z dne 12. aprila 2011 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim osebam in subjektom zaradi razmer v Iranu (UL L 100, 14.4.2011, str.
ANNEX
51).
The following entries replace the entries concerning the persons listed below, set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.
PRILOGA
Name
Naslednji vnosi nadomestijo vnose v zvezi z osebami iz seznama spodaj iz Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 359/2011:
MOGHISSEH Mohammad (a.k.a.
Datum uvrstitve na seznam
NASSERIAN)
MOGHISSEH Mohammad (tudi NASSERIAN)
Judge, Head of Tehran Revolutionary Court, branch 28.
Sodnik in vodja podružnice 28 revolucionarnega sodišča v Teheranu.
Also considered responsible for condemnations of members of the Bahai community.
Prav tako velja za odgovornega za obsodbe pripadnikov skupnosti bahajcev.
He has dealt with post-election cases.
Obravnaval je primere, povezane z obdobjem po volitvah.
He issued long prison sentences during unfair trials for social, political activists and journalists and several death sentences for protesters and social and political activists.
Na nepravičnih sojenjih je izrekel dolge zaporne kazni družbenim in političnim aktivistom ter novinarjem, pa tudi več smrtnih kazni protestnikom ter družbenim in političnim aktivistom.
DOB: 1967
Datum rojstva: 1967
Former Prosecutor General of Tehran until August 2009.
Na podlagi parlamentarne preiskove januarja 2010 je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neposredno odgovoren za pridržanje treh zapornikov, ki so nato v priporu umrli.
As Tehran Prosecutor General, he issued a blanket order used for the detention of hundreds of activists, journalists and students.
Po preiskavi, ki jo je sprožilo iransko sodstvo v zvezi z njegovo vlogo pri smrti treh moških, pridržanih po volitvah na njegov ukaz, je bil avgusta 2010 razrešen s položaja.
In January 2010 a parliamentary investigation held him directly responsible for the detention of three prisoners who subsequently died in custody.
Iranske oblasti so novembra 2014 uradno priznale njegovo vlogo pri smrti pripornikov.
He was suspended from office in August 2010 after an investigation by the Iranian judiciary into his role in the deaths of the three men detained on his orders following the election.
Iransko sodišče ga je 19. avgusta 2015 oprostilo obtožb, povezanih z mučenjem in smrtjo treh mladih moških v centru za pridržanje Kahrizak v letu 2009.
In November 2014, his role in the deaths of detainees was officially recognised by the Iranian authorities.
Sodnik kazenskega senata.
He was acquitted by an Iranian Court on August 19, 2015, on charges connected to the torture and deaths of three young men at the Kahrizak detention center in 2009.
Nekdanji sodnik v podružnici 26 revolucionarnega sodišča v Teheranu.
Magistrate of a Criminal chamber.
Pristojen je bil za primere, povezane z obdobjem po volitvah; na nepravičnih sojenjih je izrekel dolge zaporne kazni aktivistom za človekove pravice, pa tudi več smrtnih kazni protestnikom.
Former Judge, Tehran Revolutionary Court, branch 26.
Sodnik in vodja podružnice 15 revolucionarnega sodišča v Teheranu.
He was in charge of post-election cases, he issued long prison sentences during unfair trials against human rights activists and issued several death sentences for protesters.
Preiskovalni sodnik na sodišču v Teheranu.
Judge, Head of Tehran Revolutionary Court, branch 15.
Pristojen je za primere, povezane z obdobjem po volitvah; kot sodnik je poleti 2009 vodil uprizorjena sojenja in v okviru teh na smrt obsodil dva monarhista.
Committing Judge in the Tehran Tribunal.
Več kot sto političnih zapornikov, aktivistov za človekove pravice in protestnikov je obsodil na dolge zaporne kazni.
In charge of the post-election cases, he was the Judge presiding the “show trials” in summer 2009, he condemned to death two monarchists that appeared in the show trials.
Sekretar Sveta za človekove pravice.
He has sentenced more than a hundred political prisoners, human rights activists and demonstrators to lengthy prison sentences.
Nekdanji guverner province Ilam.
Secretary of the Human Right Council.
Nekdanji politični direktor na Ministrstvu za notranje zadeve.
Former governor of Ilam Province.
Kot vodja Odbora iz člena 10 Zakona o dejavnostih političnih strank in skupin je bil pristojen za izdajo dovoljenj za demonstracije in druge javne prireditve ter za registracijo političnih strank.
Former Interior Ministry's political director.
Leta 2010 je začasno ustavil dejavnosti dveh reformističnih političnih strank, povezanih z Mousavijem – Islamske iranske fronte za sodelovanje in Islamske organizacije revolucionarnih mudžahedinov.
As Head of the Article 10 Committee of the Law on Activities of Political Parties and Groups he was in charge of authorising demonstrations and other public events and registering political parties.
Od leta 2009 dosledno in vztrajno prepoveduje vse nevladne shode in ne priznava ustavne pravice do protestov, kar je vodilo v številne aretacije miroljubnih protestnikov, v nasprotju s pravico do svobode združevanja.
In 2010, he suspended the activities of two reformist political parties linked to Mousavi — the Islamic Iran Participation Front and the Islamic Revolution Mujahedeen Organization.
Leta 2009 poleg tega opoziciji ni dal dovoljenja za organizacijo žalne slovesnosti v spomin žrtvam protestov zaradi predsedniških volitev.
From 2009 onwards he has consistently and continuously prohibited all non-governmental gatherings, therefore denying a constitutional right to protest and leading to many arrests of peaceful demonstrators in contravention of the right to freedom of assembly.
Nekdanji paznik na oddelku 1 zapora Radjaishahr v mestu Karadj.
He also denied in 2009 the opposition a permit for a ceremony to mourn people killed in protests over the Presidential elections.
Več nekdanjih pripornikov ga je obtožilo mučenja in izdajanja povelj, s katerimi je preprečil zdravniško pomoč zapornikom.
Former keeper of Ward 1 of Radjaishahr prison, Karadj.
Nek pripornik iz zapora Radjaishahr v svojih zapisih trdi, da so ga pazniki z Akharianovo vednostjo hudo pretepli.