natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission adopted Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 [3] which established, inter alia, that the local targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency of Malta, Bulgaria and Poland included in the performance plans of BLUEMED FAB, DANUBE FAB and BALTIC FAB, respectively, were consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period (2015-2019).
Komisija je sprejela Izvedbeni sklep (EU) 2015/348 [3], v katerem med drugim ugotavlja, da so lokalni cilji Malte, Bolgarije in Poljske na ključnem področju uspešnosti glede stroškovne učinkovitosti, ki so vključeni v načrte izvedbe funkcionalnih blokov zračnega prostora BLUEMED, DANUBE in BALTIC, skladni z vseevropskimi cilji uspešnosti za drugo referenčno obdobje (2015–2019).
Those Member States explained that they have been affected by changes in traffic flows caused by geopolitical crises which were unforeseeable at the time of adoption of the performance plans that include those targets and which affect the calculation of those targets.
Dokumentacijo, ki so jo predložile navedene tri države članice, je ocenil organ za oceno uspešnosti (PRB), ki je zadolžen za pomoč Komisiji pri izvajanju načrta izvedbe v skladu s členom 3 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 390/2013.
In addition, Bulgaria and Poland also provided evidence, obtained on the basis of the reports on the monitoring of the performance and additional documents, which demonstrates in their view that the initial assumptions and rationales underlying the setting of the initial targets are no longer valid.
Poročila o oceni so bila Komisiji predložena 29. novembra 2016.
The documentation submitted by the three Member States was assessed by the Performance Review Body (‘PRB’), which is charged with assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013.
Na podlagi ocene prejete dokumentacije Komisija meni, da so Malta, Bolgarija in Poljska predložile zadostne dokaze v podporo zahtevi za spremembo lokalnih ciljev glede stroškovne učinkovitosti za leta 2017, 2018 in 2019.
Reports of the assessment were submitted to the Commission on 29 November 2016.
Zaradi zaprtja libijskega letalskega informativnega območja (FIR) je promet v smeri vzhod–zahod, ki je včasih prečkal Libijo, začel prečkati malteško letalsko informativno območje.
With regard to Malta, the alert threshold set for variations between planned and actual traffic, laid down in the performance plan of BLUEMED FAB, was reached and significantly exceeded for the year 2015.
Zato se šteje, da je bila zaradi okoliščin, ki jih ob sprejetju načrta izvedbe ni bilo mogoče predvideti in jih Malta ne more niti premostiti niti ne more nanje vplivati, dosežena mejna vrednost opozarjanja in so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 17(1)(b) in člena 19(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 390/2013.
Actual traffic in 2015 was 35,2 % above planned.
Zaradi nerazpoložljivosti velikih območij vzhodnega dela ukrajinskega zračnega prostora in Črnega morja za načrtovanje letov so se močno spremenili prometni tokovi.
As a result of the closure of the Libyan Flight Information Region (‘FIR’), East-West traffic which used to overfly Libya started to transit across the Malta FIR.
Čeprav se je ta kriza začela leta 2014, je trajala dlje in je imela daljnosežnejše posledice za promet v bolgarskem zračnem prostoru, kot je bilo prvotno predvideno.
It is therefore considered that the alert threshold was reached due to circumstances that were unforeseeable at the time of adoption of the performance plan and are both insurmountable and beyond the control of Malta and that the conditions of point (b) of Article 17(1) and Article 19(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 have been met.
Zato se šteje, da je bila zaradi okoliščin, ki jih ob sprejetju načrta izvedbe ni bilo mogoče predvideti in jih Bolgarija ne more niti premostiti niti ne more nanje vplivati, dosežena mejna vrednost opozarjanja in so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 17(1)(b) in člena 19(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 390/2013.
With regard to Bulgaria, the alert threshold set for variations between planned and actual traffic, laid down in the performance plan of DANUBE FAB, was also reached for the year 2015.
Poleg tega predpostavke o stroških Bolgarije, zlasti kar zadeva osebje, iz načrta izvedbe funkcionalnega bloka zračnega prostora DANUBE niso več veljavne zaradi povečanja prometa in prihodnjega odprtja novega letališča v Turčiji, za kar so potrebne spremembe bolgarskega zračnega prostora.
Actual traffic in 2015 was 22,7 % above planned.
Zato se šteje, da prvotni podatki, predpostavke in utemeljitve glede stroškov, ki so bili osnova za določitev začetnih ciljev na ključnem področju uspešnosti glede stroškovne učinkovitosti, niso več veljavni in da so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 17(1)(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 390/2013.
The unavailability of flight planning of major portions of the Eastern part of the Ukrainian airspace and of the Black Sea created significant shifts in traffic flows.
Čeprav se je ta kriza začela leta 2014, je trajala dlje in je imela daljnosežnejše posledice za promet v poljskem zračnem prostoru, kot je bilo prvotno predvideno.
Although it occurred in 2014, this crisis lasted longer and had further reaching implications for traffic in the Bulgarian airspace than originally foreseen.
Na prometne tokove v poljskem zračnem prostoru je vplivalo splošno zmanjšanje zračnega prometa v Rusijo in iz nje, še posebej pa zmanjšanje povpraševanja po letalskem prevozu med Rusko federacijo in Turčijo ter medsebojna prepoved preletov z zrakoplovi, registriranimi v Ukrajini oziroma Ruski federaciji.
The traffic flows in Bulgarian airspace were also impacted by the reduction of traffic demand between the Russian Federation and Turkey, as well as mutual interdiction of overflights of aircraft registered respectively by Ukraine and the Russian Federation.
Zato se šteje, da je bila zaradi okoliščin, ki jih ob sprejetju načrta izvedbe ni bilo mogoče predvideti in jih Poljska ne more niti premostiti niti ne more nanje vplivati, dosežena mejna vrednost opozarjanja in so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 17(1)(b) in člena 19(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 390/2013.
In addition, the cost assumptions of Bulgaria, in particular in relation to staffing, laid down in the performance plan of DANUBE FAB, are no longer valid in view of the increase in traffic and the upcoming opening of a new airport in Turkey which requires changes in Bulgarian airspace.
Navedene napačne predpostavke o stroških se nanašajo v glavnem na operativne stroške, zlasti stroške za osebje in naložbe, vključno s stroški kapitala in amortizacije, za pomembne projekte v zvezi s prestrukturiranjem in sektorsko razdelitvijo zračnega prostora, ter na potrebo po izboljšanju upravljanja varnosti in zagotovitvi prihodnjega doseganja ciljev uspešnosti glede varnosti.
It is therefore considered that the initial data, assumptions and rationales, as regards costs, underlying the setting of the initial targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency are no longer valid and that conditions of point (a) of Article 17(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 have been met.
Malti, Bolgariji in Poljski bi bilo zato treba dovoliti, da na ključnem področju uspešnosti glede stroškovne učinkovitosti spremenijo svoje lokalne cilje, če je to potrebno glede na okoliščine, zaradi katerih je bila dosežena mejna vrednost opozarjanja, in če dokazi kažejo, da prvotni podatki, predpostavke in utemeljitve, na katerih so temeljili začetni cilji, niso več veljavni.
With regard to Poland, the alert threshold set for variations between planned and actual traffic, laid down in the performance plan of BALTIC FAB, was also reached for the year 2015.
V skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 390/2013 in potem ko jim Komisija dovoli spremembo zadevnih ciljev, lahko zadevne države članice spremenijo navedene cilje in predložijo spremenjene načrte izvedbe, ki temeljijo na spremenjenih ciljih, Komisiji, ki preveri njihovo skladnost z vseevropskimi cilji za drugo referenčno obdobje.
Actual traffic in 2015 was 11,1 % below planned.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za enotno evropsko nebo –
Although it occurred in 2014, this crisis lasted longer and had further reaching implications for traffic in the Polish airspace than originally foreseen.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The traffic flows in the Polish airspace were affected by reduction of traffic to and from Russia in general, and specifically a reduction of traffic demand between the Russian Federation and Turkey as well as mutual interdiction of overflights of aircraft registered respectively by Ukraine and the Russian Federation.
Člen 1
It is therefore considered that the alert threshold was reached due to circumstances that were unforeseeable at the time of adoption of the performance plan and are both insurmountable and beyond the control of Poland and that the conditions of point (b) of Article 17(1) and Article 19(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 have been met.
Bolgarija, Malta in Poljska lahko spremenijo svoje lokalne cilje na ključnem področju uspešnosti glede stroškovne učinkovitosti za leta 2017, 2018 in 2019, ki so določeni v načrtih izvedbe funkcionalnih blokov zračnega prostora DANUBE, BLUEMED oziroma BALTIC.
In addition, Poland made incorrect assumptions on costs, laid down in the performance plan of BALTIC FAB.
Člen 2
Those incorrect cost assumptions related mainly to operating costs, in particular staff costs, and investments, including cost of capital and depreciation, in view of significant projects related to the restructuring and sectorisation of the airspace and the need to improve safety management and ensure future achievement of safety performance targets.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Bolgarijo, Republiko Malto in Republiko Poljsko.
Malta, Bulgaria and Poland should therefore be allowed to revise their local targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency, in as far as necessary in light of the circumstances causing the alert threshold to be reached and the evidence provided that the initial data, assumptions and rationales underlying the setting of the initial targets are no longer valid.
V Bruslju, 31. oktobra 2017
In accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, after having been allowed by the Commission to revise the relevant targets, the Member States concerned may revise those targets and submit amended performance plans, based on the revised targets, for the Commission to assess their consistency with the Union-wide targets for the second reference period.
Za Komisijo
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Single Sky Committee,
Članica Komisije
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
UL L 128, 9.5.2013, str. 1.
Article 1
Uredba (ES) št. 549/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. marca 2004 o določitvi okvira za oblikovanje enotnega evropskega neba (okvirna uredba) (UL L 96, 31.3.2004, str.
Bulgaria, Malta and Poland may revise their local targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency for the years 2017, 2018 and 2019, laid down in the performance plans of DANUBE, BLUEMED and BALTIC functional airspace blocks, respectively.
1).
Article 2
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/348 z dne 2. marca 2015 o skladnosti določenih ciljev, vključenih v nacionalne načrte ali načrte funkcionalnih blokov zračnega prostora, predložene v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 549/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, z vseevropskimi cilji uspešnosti za drugo referenčno obdobje (UL L 60, 4.3.2015, str. 55).
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Malta, and the Republic of Poland.
Leta 2016 so Malta, Bolgarija in Poljska v skladu s členom 17(1) v povezavi s členom 19(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 390/2013 Komisijo zaprosile za dovoljenje za spremembo lokalnih ciljev glede stroškovne učinkovitosti za leta 2017, 2018 in 2019.
Done at Brussels, 31 October 2017.
Navedene države članice so pojasnile, da občutijo posledice sprememb prometnih tokov, nastalih zaradi geopolitičnih kriz, ki jih ni bilo mogoče predvideti v času sprejetja načrtov izvedbe, ki vključujejo navedene cilje, in vplivajo na izračun navedenih ciljev.
For the Commission
V zvezi z Malto je bila mejna vrednost opozarjanja, določena v načrtu izvedbe funkcionalnega bloka zračnega prostora BLUEMED za razlike med načrtovanim in dejanskim prometom, v letu 2015 dosežena in občutno presežena.
Member of the Commission
V letu 2015 je bil dejanski promet za 35,2 % večji od načrtovanega.
OJ L 128, 9.5.2013, p.
Tudi za Bolgarijo je bila mejna vrednost opozarjanja, določena v načrtu izvedbe funkcionalnega bloka zračnega prostora DANUBE za razlike med načrtovanim in dejanskim prometom, dosežena za leto 2015.
1.
V letu 2015 je bil dejanski promet za 22,7 % večji od načrtovanega.
Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation) (OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p.
Tudi za Poljsko je bila mejna vrednost opozarjanja, določena v načrtu izvedbe funkcionalnega bloka zračnega prostora BALTIC za razlike med načrtovanim in dejanskim prometom, dosežena za leto 2015.
1).
V letu 2015 je bil dejanski promet za 11,1 % manjši od načrtovanega.
Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1995
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2017/1995
of 6 November 2017
z dne 6. novembra 2017
to maintain in the Official Journal of the European Union the reference of harmonised standard EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 on static thermoplastic tanks for above-ground storage of domestic heating oils, kerosene and diesel fuels in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o ohranitvi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije sklica na harmonizirani standard EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 o plastomernih stabilnih posodah za nadzemno skladiščenje kurilnega olja, kerozina in dizelskih pogonskih goriv v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 305/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC [1], and in particular Article 18(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 305/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2011 o določitvi usklajenih pogojev za trženje gradbenih proizvodov in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 89/106/EGS [1] ter zlasti člena 18(2) Uredbe,
Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, harmonised standards provided for in Article 17 are to fulfil the requirements of the harmonised system set out in or by means of this Regulation.
Harmonizirani standardi iz člena 17 naj bi v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 305/2011 izpolnjevali zahteve harmoniziranega sistema, določenega v tej uredbi ali z njo.
In January 2011, the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) adopted the harmonised standard EN 13341:2005 + A1: 2011 ‘Static thermoplastic tanks for above ground storage of domestic heating oils, kerosene and diesel fuels — Blow moulded and rotationally moulded polyethylene tanks and rotationally moulded tanks made of anionically polymerized polyamide 6 — Requirements and test methods’.
Januarja 2011 je Evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN) sprejel harmonizirani standard EN 13341:2005 + A1: 2011 „Plastomerne stabilne posode za nadzemno skladiščenje kurilnega olja, kerozina in dizelskih pogonskih goriv – Posode iz pihanega polietilena, rotacijsko oblikovanega polietilena in iz poliamida 6, proizvedenega z anionsko polimerizacijo – Zahteve in preskusne metode“.
The reference of the standard was republished several times with the latest publication in 2017 [3].
Sklic na standard je bil večkrat ponovno objavljen, zadnjič leta 2017 [3].
On 21 August 2015 Germany launched a formal objection procedure in respect of the harmonised standard EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011.
Nemčija je 21. avgusta 2015 začela postopek uradnega ugovora v zvezi s harmoniziranim standardom EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011.
The formal objection was based on the lack of harmonised methods in that standard for ensuring the mechanical resistance, load-bearing capacity, stability and resistance to fragmentation or crushing of the products in question when installed in earthquake or flood areas.
Utemeljitev uradnega ugovora je bila, da v navedenem standardu ni harmoniziranih metod za zagotavljanje mehanske odpornosti, nosilnosti, stabilnosti in odpornosti proti drobljenju ali porušitvene trdnosti zadevnih proizvodov, ko so ti nameščeni na potresnih ali poplavnih območjih.
Consequently, Germany demanded the restriction of the reference of the standard published in the Official Journal of the European Union by excluding earthquake or flood areas from its scope, or alternatively the withdrawal of that reference of the standard altogether.
Zato je Nemčija zahtevala, da se sklic na standard, objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, omeji tako, da se iz njegovega področja uporabe izvzamejo potresna ali poplavna območja ali pa da se sklic na standard v celoti umakne.
According to Germany, that standard does not contain any stipulations for ascertaining the performance of the construction products in question when they are installed in areas where a risk of earthquakes or flooding exists.
Po mnenju Nemčije navedeni standard ne vsebuje določb o ugotavljanju lastnosti zadevnih gradbenih proizvodov, ko so ti nameščeni na območjih, kjer obstaja nevarnost potresov ali poplav.
The necessary assessment methods for those purposes are completely missing, when it comes to design, support construction or anchoring the tanks.
Kar zadeva zasnovo, podporno strukturo ali pritrditev posod, pa potrebnih metod za ocenjevanje sploh ni.
Moreover, the extent to which impacts resulting from loads from earthquakes or floods can be absorbed by them, cannot be assessed either.
Poleg tega ni mogoče oceniti, v kakšni meri lahko te posode prenesejo obremenitve, ki nastanejo pri potresih ali poplavah.
Germany considered these shortcomings to constitute a violation of Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, as the standard at hand did not entirely satisfy the requirements set out in the relevant mandate as provided in Article 18 of that Regulation.
Nemčija je menila, da te pomanjkljivosti pomenijo kršitev člena 17(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 305/2011, saj zadevni standard ne izpolnjuje v celoti zahtev iz ustreznega mandata, kot je določeno v členu 18 navedene uredbe.
When assessing the admissibility of the claims brought forward, it should be noted that the additional alleged needs brought forward by Germany relate to the installation and the subsequent use of the products in question in areas where a risk of earthquakes or flooding exists.
Pri ocenjevanju dopustnosti predloženih zahtevkov je treba opozoriti, da se domnevne dodatne potrebe, ki jih je izrazila Nemčija, nanašajo na namestitev in poznejšo uporabo zadevnih proizvodov na potresnih ali poplavnih območjih.
However, according to Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, harmonised standards are to provide the methods and the criteria for assessing the performance of the products covered by them.
Vendar morajo v skladu s členom 17(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 305/2011 harmonizirani standardi določati metode in merila za ocenjevanje lastnosti proizvodov iz teh standardov.
The purpose of the harmonised system set out in or by means of that Regulation is to lay down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products, not to provide rules for their installation or their use.
Namen harmoniziranega sistema, določenega v navedeni uredbi ali z njo, je opredeliti harmonizirane pogoje za trženje gradbenih proizvodov, ne pa določiti pravila za njihovo namestitev ali uporabo.
The rights to bring forward formal objections in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 cannot, however, be extended to claims focusing on other matters than the content of the standards in question.
Pravic do uradnih ugovorov v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (EU) št. 305/2011 ni mogoče razširiti na zahtevke v zvezi z zadevami, ki se ne nanašajo na vsebino zadevnih standardov.
Such claims are therefore to be considered inadmissible in the context of formal objections.
Taki zahtevki se zato v smislu uradnih ugovorov štejejo za nedopustne.
Therefore, and since the first demand of Germany, to restrict the reference of the standard by excluding earthquake or flood areas from its scope of application, focuses on other matters than the content of the standard in question, it should be considered inadmissible.
Ker se prvi zahtevek Nemčije za omejitev sklica na standard z izvzetjem potresnih ali poplavnih območij iz področja njegove uporabe osredotoča na zadeve, ki se ne nanašajo na vsebino zadevnega standarda, bi ga bilo treba šteti za nedopustnega.
The general alternative demand of Germany, to withdraw the reference of the standard altogether, is mainly based on the inadequacy of the standard as it stands, especially when it comes to the installation and the subsequent use of the products in question in earthquake or flood areas.
Druga splošna zahteva Nemčije, da se sklic na standard v celoti umakne, temelji predvsem na trditvi, da je standard, kakršen je, neprimeren, zlasti ko gre za namestitev in poznejšo uporabo zadevnih proizvodov na potresnih ali poplavnih območjih.
However, Member States remain fully entitled to regulate the specific conditions for the installation or the use of construction products, provided that such specific conditions do not entail requirements for the assessment of the performance of the products in breach of the harmonised system.
Vendar so države članice še naprej v celoti upravičene, da urejajo posebne pogoje za namestitev ali uporabo gradbenih proizvodov, če ti ne vključujejo zahtev za oceno lastnosti proizvodov, ki bi bile v nasprotju s harmoniziranim sistemom.
Member States are thus able to prohibit or limit the installation or use of the products in question in earthquake or flood areas, as currently is the case in Germany.
Države članice tako lahko prepovejo ali omejijo namestitev ali uporabo zadevnih proizvodov na potresnih ali poplavnih območjih, kot se trenutno dogaja v Nemčiji.
On the basis of the contents of EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 as well as the information submitted by Germany, by CEN and by industry, and after consulting the committees established by Article 64 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 and by Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], it is widely agreed that the reference of that standard should be maintained in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Na podlagi vsebine standarda EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 in informacij, ki so jih predložili Nemčija, CEN in industrija, ter po posvetovanju z odboroma, ustanovljenima s členom 64 Uredbe (EU) št. 305/2011 ter členom 22 Uredbe (EU) št. 1025/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4], vlada splošno soglasje, da je treba sklic na navedeni standard v Uradnem listu Evropske unije ohraniti.
The alleged incompleteness of that standard should thus not be considered a sufficient reason for complete withdrawal of the reference of the standard EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 from the Official Journal of the European Union.
Domnevna nepopolnost navedenega standarda se torej ne bi smela šteti za zadosten razlog za popoln umik sklica na standard EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 iz Uradnega lista Evropske unije.
The reference of EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 should therefore be maintained in the Official Journal of the European Union,
Sklic na standard EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije se zato ohrani –